HomeMy WebLinkAboutAGENDA REPORT 1998 1021 CC REG ITEM 09ATO:
FROM:
DATE:
CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA REPORT
The Honorable City Council
7/x,3(4)
ITEMM a . he
CITY OF MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA
City Council Meeting
of (o'aI -L9IK
ACTION• "64 - 12 'I'll "13 ifuld'
hcar:n� o�Gr�;dev.lo�Omen
' ov- eern�rr� S'Lhcalule¢�or !t I$'ej
t1ja I r�qf + be Pr0CG,S7gM
Nelson Miller, Director of Community Development !*��
October 9, 1998 (City Council Meeting of October 21,
1998)
SUBJECT: CONSIDER REQUEST BY A -B PROPERTIES AND SOUTHERN
CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY FOR APPROVAL OF GENERAL PLAN
AMENDMENT NO. 97 -2 TO AMEND THE LAND USE ELEMENT OF THE
GENERAL PLAN ON 43.32 ACRES OF UNDEVELOPED LAND
APPROXIMATELY 1,300 FEET WEST OF GABBERT ROAD AND NORTH
OF THE RAILROAD TRACKS (APN. 500 -34 -22 AND -23) FROM
"AG -I" (AGRICULTURAL 1 DWELLING UNIT /10 -40 ACRES) TO
11I -2" (MEDIUM INDUSTRIAL) AND ZONE CHANGE NO. 97 -7 TO
CHANGE THE ZONING ON THE PROPERTY FROM AE (AGRICULTURAL
EXCLUSIVE) TO M -2 (LIMITED INDUSTRIAL). CONTINUED FROM
SEPTEMBER 16, 1998.
Background
At the City Council meeting of September 16, 1998, City Council
continued consideration of General Plan Amendment 97 -2 and Zone
Change 97 -6 (A -B Properties and Southern California Edison) to
October 21, 1998. It was requested by the applicant, that staff
attempt to prepare a draft Development Agreement for consideration
by the Planning Commission on October 12, 1998, so that the
Planning Commission could make a recommendation to City Council on
October 21, 1998, and that a public hearing on a draft Development
Agreement also be pre- advertised for the City Council meeting of
October 21, 1998.
Discussion
In order to hold a public hearing before Planning Commission on a
draft Development Agreement, a notice needed to be sent to the
newspaper on September 25, which gave notice of public hearing and
availability of the proposed documents for review. Staff and the
Ad Hoc Committee (Councilmembers Evans and Perez) were not able to
complete preparation and City Attorney review prior to this date.
Therefore, a public hearing was not advertised for consideration
of a draft Development Agreement for the Planning Commission
meeting of October 12, or the City Council meeting of October 21,
1998.
006-001r
GPA 97 -2 and ZC 97 -7
October 21, 1998
Page 2
Attached is a letter from John Newton, representing A -B
Properties, which requests approval of the General Plan Amendment
and Zone Change based upon execution of a "Waiver of Right to
Judicial Review ". Such an agreement was used with Bollinger, but
that involved a much different situation where the developer had
already executed a Development Agreement, but the Agreement would
not become effective until he gained ownership of the land.
Additionally, Southern California Edison who is also a property
owner involved in the proposed General Plan Amendment and zone
change was not included in this waiver.
Concerns have previously been identified with respect to the
proposed change in designation, including the effects of
dedication and construction of the 118 Bypass and its connection
to Los Angeles Avenue; adequate, dedicated public access to the
properties and related circulation impacts; addressing the
Gabbert /Walnut Canyon Flood Control Deficiency Study; and relation
to surrounding land use. A Development Agreement has been
proposed as a means to address these issues to mitigate potential
impacts of a change in designation of the properties. Without a
Development Agreement, Specific Plan, or other alternative
mechanism, these issues may not be adequately addressed to warrant
a change in designation.
The Planning Commission is now slated to consider the proposed
Development Agreement at their meeting on November 9, 1998. It is
therefore suggested that these applications be continued to the
City Council meeting of November 18, 1998 to allow for Planning
Commission review and recommendation.
Recommendation
It is recommended that this item be continued to November 18,
1998, with the public hearing remaining open and to schedule the
Development Agreement pubic hearing for the same date.
Attachments
1. Zoning Map
2. General Plan Circulation Element Map
3. Letter dated October 5, 1998
(jo( (j'(j2
, BE-
43 w ve as n
1,0S A &I
Sac
u oft 37
OS-314.4ac
31, " "
" P" In
:72
, \re, Do
k: it
*CIO-
31
om I
min
I= IE
WAR,
WINE
AE.
ATTACHMENT 1
om-003
'()TT
IF VD
FREEWAY
Of ERCKANGE •.
NNNNQ�
SUC -UWE ARTERIAL -�
FOUR-LANE ARTERIAL
'-- R --
RURAL COLLECTOR
��-
LOCAL COLUCTOR
3
SIGNALIZED INTVRSCCTION
AT -GRADE RR CROSSING
GRADE SEPARATED RR CROSSING
- "'-'-• -•
CRY LINTT ROUNUARY
•rm.mmu■
SR -118 FREEWAY CORRIDOR
� mry '"'� �P^nrr� npsu< Wp�n <nu frr Iwwt
C.n W wnwt..r< ►.nom
xW u (k p.nnx nr <nJ laamutin Oe�<nwe<,.. 0<wnm<n.
Iw rW.�.W� w.rn <rwyl
FIGURE 2
CITY OF MOOR-PARK
GENERAL PLAN CIRCULATION ELEMENT
HIGHWAY NETWORK
May n. 1992
ATTACHMENT 2 Lf/
V
(ICto004
John W. Newton & Associates, Inc.
(0-4F sionu[ �orziulEanEs
165 High St., Suite 103
Post Office Box 471
Moorpark, California 93021
Telephone (805) 378 -0073
Fax No. (805) 378 -0080
October 5, 1998
Steven Kueny
City Manager
799 Moorpark Avenue
Moorpark, California 93021
Re: GPA 97 -2, ZC 97 -6
Development Agreement 98 -4
A -B Properties
CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING
OCTOBER 21, 1998
Dear Steve:
Per our discussion last Thursday, I obtained a copy of the Moorpark
Country Club Estates "Waiver of Right to Judicial Review" document and
prepared a similar document applicable to A -B Properties.
The owners of the subject property have executed same as further
evidence of their positive intent and commitment. With this added incentive
and security to the City, please recommend to the City Council that:
I. the GPA and Zone Change be approved on October 21, 1998
2. the Industrial Tentative Tract Map be deemed complete for
processing
3. the draft development agreement be scheduled for public hearing
at the October 26, 1998 Planning Commission meeting
4. the Planning rcmmissicn Oction and recormendation be returned
to the City Council for final approval, along with the second
reading of the zoning ordinance on November 4, 1998, and
5. these actions are not precedent setting but are unique to the
A -B Properties project in recognition of the Planning Commission's
OCT 0 1998
ATTACHMENT 3
REAL ESTATE BROKERAGE MINERAL
Commercial • Industrial • Land REAL ESTATE DEVELOPMENT
RESOURCE
Residential Relocation DEVELOPMENT Engineering • Land Division • Permits
Planning • Zoning
Steve Kueny
October 5, 1998
Page 2
approval of GPA 97 -2, ZC 97 -6; the Applicants' follow -
through and agreement with the key elements of a development
agreement; and, the execution of the Waiver of Right to
Judicial Review.
Thanks Steve.
Enclosure
cc: A -B Properties
Nelson Miller
Community Development Committee
incere1y
John W. Newton
WAIVER OF RIGHT TO JUDICIAL REVIEW
This Waiver of right to Judicial Review ( "Waiver ") is made
this day of October, 1998, by and between the CITY OF MOORPARK,
a municipal corporation, ( "City "), on the one hand and A -B PROPERTIES,
a California General Partnership, on the other hand, with respect to
the following facts:
A. City and A -B are contemplating entering into a Development
Agreement dated October , 1998 ( "Agreement "). The defined terms in
this Waiver shall have the same meanings as in the Agreement.
B. City will not approve the development of the Property on the
terms set forth in the Agreement without assuring itself that it will
obtain the benefits contained in the Agreement.
C. The Agreement will not become effective until the owners of
the Property have agreed to be bound by the terms of the Agreement.
D. City's approval of the Project will occur after the Agreement
becomes effective.
E. Terms of the Agreement have been generally accepted by the
City and A -B. City will not unreasonably withhold approval of the
Agreement, nor expand the scope of the Agreement beyond the existing
general terms and conditions negotiated by and between A -B and the
City's Community Development Committee.
F. City desires to retain the right to replan or rezone the
Property to return the Property to its current planning and zoning
designations if the Agreement does not become effective within a
reasonable time without having to litigate its right to do so with
A -B.
Based on the foregoing, it is hereby agreed:
1. City will not commence the process required for replanning
the Property to the current Ag -1 designation or rezoning the Property
to the current A -E ( "redesignation of the Property ") zone for 30
days after the date upon which the Enabling Ordinance becomes
effective pursuant to Government Code Section 39637 in order to allow
a reasonable amount of time for the Agreement to become effective.
Thereafter, City may, if it determines in its sole discretion that
it is in its interest to do so, commence the redesignation of the
Property.
2. If City commences the redesignation of the Property, A -B shall
have the right to appear at any hearing held in connection with the
redesignation of the Property and to make their opposition to the
1
resesignation of the Property known.
3. City will abandon the redesignation of the Property if the
Agreement becomes effective before the redesignation of the Property
has become final.
4. A -B hereby waives any rights they might otherwise have to
seek judicial review of City's actions in connection with the redesigna-
tion of the Property, including, but not limited to, any claim of inverse
condemnation, if the Agreement has not become effective before the
redesignation of the Property has become final.
5. This Waiver may be executed in one or more counterparts,
each of which shall be deemed an original.
Dated: October , 1998 CITY OF MOORPARK
By.
Patrick J. Hunter
Mayor
ATTEST
Deborah Traffenstadt
City Clerk
Dated: October 1998 A -B PROPERTIES
By:
Z �/
Stephen R. n
General Partner
By.
Paul D. Burns
General Partner
2
C +z^�.
,u