HomeMy WebLinkAboutAGENDA REPORT 1998 1216 CC REG ITEM 10ETO:
FROM:
MOORPARK CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA REPORT
Honorable City Council
114'5q
ITEM LQwgo
CITY OF ?'d'IOORPARK, CALIFORNIA
City Council Meeting
of l - ��- S
ACTION': A d o g fie
ke5o1u+Yon No
BY: C41
John E. Nowak, Assistant City Manager
DATE: 04 December 1998 (Council Meeting of 12- 16 -98)
SUBJECT: Consider Resolution No. 98- Approving a
Waiver to Setback Requirements Requested by
Cabrillo Economic Development Corporation for
Tentative Tract Map No. 5161 and RPD No. 98 -07
(Gisler Field).
BACKGROUND: In July 1998 the Moorpark Redevelopment
Agency approved a Disposition and Development Agreement
(DDA) with Cabrillo Economic Development Corporation (CEDC)
for the construction of 59 single family residential units
at the Gisler Field Site. The DDA allowed CEDC to request
certain modifications to the development standards
contained in the Municipal Code for residential projects.
DISCUSSION: The DDA with CEDC was approved by the
Redevelopment Agency on July 8, 1998. Section 04.02 of the
DDA recognized that certain setback modifications would be
required to develop the project as proposed and provide 25%
of the units as affordable housing. The Agency, in the
DDA, indicated that it would support such modifications to
setback requirements.
The Municipal Code grants the Cit
reduce any required setbacks by 20q
If the Council desires it may grant
in the setback requirements.
submitted a letter requesting the
modifications to setbacks. The
Department reviewed the modif ice
y Council authority to
as a matter of course.
an additional reduction
On November 13, CEDC
Council approve certain
Community Development
tion request and has
0002V)
submitted a memorandum indicating which properties would be
within the 20% reduction envelope and which require a
greater reduction in seatbacks. The parcels requiring more
than the 20% reduction are indicated by an asterisk ( *) on
the chart attached to the Community Development Department
memorandum. As indicated almost all of the parcels require
a waiver greater than 20% for interior side yard setbacks
and minimum distance between structures.
There are no objections from the Department for the Council
to grant the side, front and rear yard setbacks as
indicated on the preliminary plans.
Resolution No. 98- would approve the request for
setback reductions as shown on the preliminary plans
presented to the Redevelopment Agency on September 2 and
incorporated in Tentative Tract Map No. 5161. It should be
emphasized that this recommendation applies only to the
Gisler Field project and no other, on the basis of the
unique condition resulting from twenty -five percent (25 %)
of the residential units being sold as affordable housing
units. The City would not be establishing a precedent by
this action.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council adopt
Resolution No. 98- approving waivers to the setback
requirements for Tentative Tract Map. No. 5161 and RPD No.
98 -07.
Attached: Resolution No. 98-
Letter from CEDC
Community Development Staff Memorandum and
attachments thereto
Section 04.02 of the DDA
0002;:()
RESOLUTION NO. 98-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA APPROVING WAIVERS TO SETBACK
STANDARDS REQUIRED BY THE ZONING ORDINANCE FOR
RESIDENTIAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENTS FOR PLANNED RESIDENTIAL
DEVELOPMENT NO. 98 -07 AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 5161,
LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF POINDEXTER AVENUE EAST OF
SIERRA AVENUE ADJACENT TO POINDEXTER PARK (APN 511 -08-
30). APPLICANT: CABRILLO ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
CORPORATION.
WHEREAS, this proposed project will involve the development
of 59 single family residential dwellings, including 15 units to
be designated for very low or lower income households as required
by the Moorpark Redevelopment Agency; and
WHEREAS, Section 17.36.030B3 of the Zoning Ordinance allows
the City Council to modify certain development standards that
apply to Market Rate Single - Family Residential projects not to
exceed 20% for projects that provide rental or ownership units for
very low or lower income households; and
WHEREAS, waivers have been submitted consistent with the
pertaining provisions of the Zoning Ordinance to modify Front
Yard, Side Yard and Rear Yard Setbacks and Setbacks between
buildings by 20% as provided for by the Zoning Ordinance; and
WHEREAS, in addition to the waiver requests consistent with
the 20% criteria, applicant on many lots throughout the project
has requested waivers of the development standards for: interior
side yards and distance between structures for one -story and two -
story units all of which exceed the 20% criteria in the code.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK DOES
HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. That the Zoning Ordinance provides that a waiver of
development standards, up to 20% of those required for Residential
Planned Developments of Market Rate Single Residential projects,
may be granted to developments. Tentative Tract Map No. 5161 and
RPD No. 98 -07 provides ownership units for very low or lower
income households which are incorporated into the project.
(3Q ()Zzl
Resolution No. 98-
Page 2
Section 2. That no provisions of the Zoning Ordinance preclude the
Council from determining, based upon the benefit to the community,
that a waiver in excess of 20% of the standards may be granted.
Section 3. That the Council has determined that because of the
benefit to the community relating to the provision of affordable
housing opportunities and consistency with the goals of the
Housing Element of the General Plan, and the requirements of the
Redevelopment Agency to develop affordable housing, that the
granting of waivers to setbacks up to and in excess of 20% of the
standards described in Section 17.36.030.3.B is justified.
Section 4. That this action to grant waivers to setback criteria
shall not be deemed to be a precedent to be applied to other
development projects either with or without the identified benefit
to the community.
Section 5. That this grant of waivers to setbacks shall become
effective only if the project referred to in this Resolution is
ultimately approved by the City Council.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 16th day of December, 1998.
ATTEST:
Patrick Hunter, Mayor
Deborah S. Traffenstedt
City Clerk
\ \MOR_PRI SERV \HOME FOLDERS\ CLafleur \M \Pcresos \98resos \cabrillo waiver.doc
0 C M Cabrillo Economic Development Corporation
11011 Azahar Street, Saticoy, California 93004 (805) 659 -3791 Fax (805) 659 -3195
RECEIVED
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
1) On most lots the minimum front yard
NOV 1 1998
PRESIDENT
November 13, 1998
the porch and
DAVID J. SABEDRA
The
ADVISORY BOARD
Channel National Islands
are 1, 26, 27,
City of Moorpark
and 41, which
RONL.HERTEL
Administrative Services Department
VICE PRESIDENT
to the garage of
18 to 20 feet.
MARLA SAN DALL
Only lot 1
has a setback
Community Representative
Apricot Ranch
John Nowak
BARBARAJOURNET
Community Representative
Simi Valley
Assistant City Manager
TREASURER
City of Moorpark
KENNETH R.
Soar s, SandellERIDETH
799 Moorpark Avenue
BernacchiBPetrovich
Moorpark, CA 93021
SECRETARY
SISTER CARMEN RODRIGUEZ
St. John's
Re: Gisler Field
Comnity
Tentative Tract Map No.5161
RENECORADO
Community Representative Dear Mr. Nowak
Casa Velsquez
Camarillo
RICHARD FRANCIS This is to formally request that the City Council or
Attorney planning Commission make the following modifications in
ERNIE
Community epre the setback requirements for the Gisler Field project.
Community Representative q
Flllmore These were included in the basic concept and schematic
JESSICA MURRAY drawings approved by the Agency and in the application
Community Representative
Montgomery Oaks Community submitted to the City:
Homes, Inc., Ojai
DEAN A.PAUS
People Helping People
1) On most lots the minimum front yard
setback will be
18 feet to
the porch and
20 feet to the garage.
The
ADVISORY BOARD
exceptions
are 1, 26, 27,
28, 29, 38, 39,
and 41, which
RONL.HERTEL
have front
yard setbacks
to the garage of
18 to 20 feet.
Hertel Constructors
Only lot 1
has a setback
to the porch of
less than 18 feet
BARBARAJOURNET
Community Representative
16 feet).
Oxnard
BChanBBR�MntiCRI.ORTIZ 2) On all lots adjacent to a public street, the minimum
Legal Services side yard setback will be eight feet.
Association
RICHARD McNISH
Strathmore Homes 3) On all interior lots, the minimum, side yard setback
ALZAPANTA will be three feet.
Atlantic Richfield
C-orpany
4) On most lots the minimum distance between structures
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR that are separated by a side lot line and do not share a
RODNEY E. FERNANDEZ common wall will be eight feet. Between lots 1 and 2; and
39 and 40, the distance is six feet. The other side yard
setback for lot 1 is ten feet, for lot 2 is five feet, for
lot 39 is five feet, and for lot 40 is ten feet.
5) The minimum rear yard setback will be 16 feet.
The setbacks are shown on the attached chart.
.0s. 0002L,312r
John Nowak
November 13, 1998
Page 2
We also formally request that the streets for this tract
be public and the adoption of the public street standard
that we have proposed for this project.
Please contact me if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
Karen Flock
Project Manager
Via fax 529 -8270 (4 pages)
C 0 0Z,
Gisler Field, Tract 5161
List of Proposed Setbacks
Public
Minimum
Front Yard
Front Yard
Interior
Interior
Strecet
Distance
Setback to
Setback to
Side Yard
Side Yard
Side Yard
Between
Rear Yard
Lot #
Porch
Garage
Setback
Setback
Setback
Structures
Setback
Notes
1
16.00
18.00
3.00
10.00
6.00
16.00
2
19.00
21.50
3.00
5.00
6.00
20.00
3
23.00
25.50
3.00
5.00
8.00
16.00
4
19.00
21.50
3.00
5.00
8.00
20.00
5
23.00
25.50
3.00
5.00
8.00
16.00
6
19.00
21.50
3.00
5.00
8.00
20.00
7
23.00
25.50
3.00
10.00
8.00
16.00
8
18.00
20.50
5.00
8.00
8.00
16.00
maximum front yard setback
9
18.00
20.50
3.00
5.00
8.00
16.00
maximum front yard setback
10
18.00
20.50
3.00
5.00
8.00
16.00
11
18.00
20.50
3.00
5.00
8.00
16.00
12
18.00
20.50
3.00
5.00
8.00
16.00
13
18.00
20.50
3.00
9.00
8.00
16.00
maximum front yard setback
14
18.00
20.50
3.00
9.00
8.00
16.00
maximum front yard setback
15
18.00
20.50
3.00
5.00
8.00
16.00
16
18.00
20.50
3.00
5.00
8.00
16.00
17
18.00
20.50
3.00
5.00
8.00
16.00
18
18.00
20.50
3.00
5.00
8.00
16.00
19
18.00
20.50
5.00
8.00
8.00
16.00
maximum front yard setback
20
18.00
20.00
5.00
8.00
8.00
16.00
maximum front yard setback
21
18.00
20.50
3.00
5.00
8.00
16.00
22
21.00
23.00
3.00
5.00
8.00
16.00
23
21.00
23.00
3.00
5.00
8.00
16.00
24
18.50
21.00
3.00
5.00
8.00
16.00
25
19.00
21.50
3.00
5.00
8.00
16.00
26
> 18.00
18.00
3.00
10.00
8.00
16.00
27
> 18.00
18.00
3.00
10.00
8.00
16.00
28
> 18.00
18.00
3.00
5.00
8.00
18.50
could increase setback to garage
29
> 19.50
19.50
3.00
5.00
8.00
17.00
could increase setback to garage
30
18.00
20.50
3.00
5.00
8.00
17.50
31
18.00
20.50
3.00
5.00
8.00
16.00
32
19.00
21.00
3.00
5.00
8.00
16.00
33
18.00
20.50
5.00
8.00
8.00
16.00
maximum front yard setback
34
18.00
20.50
3.00
8.00
8.00
44.50
maximum front yard setback
35
21.50
23.50
3.00
5.00
8.00
24.00
36
18.00
20.00
3.00
5.00
8.00
26.00
37
21.00
23.00
3.00
5.00
8.00
18.00
38
18.00
18.00
3.00
5.00
8.00
18.00
could increase setback to garage
39
> 18.00
18.00
3.00
5.00
6.00
18.50
could increase setback to garage
40
> 20.00
20.00
3.00
10.00
6.00
16.00
41
> 18.00
18.00
12.50
10.00
15.50
18.50
could increase setback to garage
42
19.00
21.50
3.00
10.00
13.00
28.00
43
28.00
30.50
3.00
10.00
13.00
20.00
Page 1 0 0 0 -2j
Gisler Field, Tract 5161
List of Proposed Setbacks
Front Yard Front Yard Interior Interior
Setback to Setback to Side Yard Side Yard
Lot #
Porch
Garaee
Setback
Setback
44
19.00
21.50
3.00
10.00
45
27.00
29.50
3.00
8.00
46
18.00
20.50
3.00
16.00
47
18.00
20.50
5.00
6.50
48
18.00
20.50
3.00
8.50
49
18.00
20.50
3.00
8.00
50
18.00
20.50
3.00
51
18.00
20.50
3.00
9.00
52
18.00
20.50
5.00
7.00
53
18.00
20.50
3.00
54
21.50
23.50
3.00
5.00
55
18.00
20.00
3.00
5.00
56
22.00
24.00
3.00
5.00
57
20.00
22.00
3.00
5.00
58
23.00
25.00
3.00
5.00
59
> 20.00
20.00
3.00
10.00
Public
Streeet
Side Yard
Setback
14.00
17.00
16.00
16.00
17.00
Page 2
Minimum
Distance
Between
Rear Yard
Structures
Setback Notes
13.00
28.00
13.00
20.00
8.00
16.00
8.00
16.00
9.50
16.00
11.50
16.00
12.00
16.00
10.00
16.00
8.00
16.00
8.00
16.00
8.00
16.00
8.00
19.50
8.00
16.00
8.00
18.50
8.00
16.00
8.00 22.00
OOOZ2 D
CITY OF MOORPARK
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
MEMORANDUM
TO: John Nowak, Assistant City Manager
FROM: Wayne Loftus, Planning Manager 1��
DATE: December 3, 1998
SUBJECT: REVIEW OF REQUEST FOR WAIVER OF CERTAIN DEVELOPMENT
STANDARDS FOR RESIDENTIAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT NO. 98-07
AND TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 5161— GISLER FIELD; LOCATED ON THE
SOUTH SIDE OF POINDEXTER AVENUE EAST OF SIERRA AVENUE
ADJACENT TO POINDEXTER PARK — CABRILLO ECONOMIC
DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION - APPLICANT
Summary:
On November 13, 1998, Cabrillo Economic Development Corporation submitted a request to the
City Council for waiver of certain setback standards required by the Zoning Ordinance for the
development of Residential Planned Developments. The proposed project comprises 59 single -
family dwellings on 6.6 acres. The criteria outlined below is applicable to this type of development
and the request for waiver of the standards is consistent, except as noted with code provisions that
allow City Council to approve modifications up to 20% of the standards. The proposed project of
59 dwelling units includes 41 two story and 18 one story homes.
Discussion:
Section 17.36.030.B.3 of the Zoning Ordinance allows the City Council to modify certain
development standards by an amount not to exceed 20% for projects that provide rental or ownership
units for very low or lower income households. The standards that are outlined below are found in
Section 17.36.030.B.3.b of the Zoning Ordinance, titled Setbacks for Market -Rate, Single - Family
Residential Projects. The applicant's request presented in comparison to the development criteria
below are within the 20% waiver threshold except as noted. The chart below is a summary analysis;
the applicant has submitted a lot by lot listing of setbacks requested to be waived, which is attached
to the Council Agenda Report for this item.
Front Yard Setback:
Development Standard
Applicant's Request
Within 20% Standard
Minimum 20'
16 ft. to porch; 18 ft. to garage
16 ft. = 20% waiver
Average 20'
19.5 ft. to porch; 20.7 ft. to garage
16 ft. = 20% waiver
(R)OZ27
John Nowak, Assistance City Manager
Review of request for waiver of certain development standards — Cabrillo Economic Development Corporation
Page 2 of 3
December 3, 1998
Vary Setbacks No waiver requested see Note No. 1
Rear Yard Setback:
Development Standard
Applicant's Request
Within 20% Standard
20' — House
16 ft. minimum; average is 17.9
ft.
16 ft. = 20% waiver
10' — Patio/Balcony
None
4 ft. = 20% waiver
Side Yard Setbacks:
Development Standard
Applicant's Request
Within 20% Standard
10 ft. from street
8 ft. on 5 lots; 9 ft. on 2 lots
8 ft. = 20% waiver
* 5 ft. interior
3 ft. on 52 lots
4 ft. = 20% waiver
10 ft. sum of side yards
8 ft. on 33 lots
8 ft. = 20 % waiver
Distance between Structures:
Development Standard
Applicant's Request
Within 20% Standard
* 12' total side yards between
6 ft. on 3 lots; 8 ft. on 19 lots
9 ft. 9 in. = 20% waiver
one story homes
* 15' total side yards between
8 ft. on 32 lots; other lots vary
12 ft. = 20% waiver
two story homes
between 9 ft. and 11.5 ft; 6 lots
are at 12 ft. or more (See note
2)
10 ft. for second story if
8 ft. on 36 lots
8 ft. = 20% waiver
windows face side yard
U () 0Z�S
John Nowak, Assistance City Manager
Review of request for waiver of certain development standards — Cabrillo Economic Development Corporation
Page 3 of 3
December 3, 1998
20 ft. for second story if
16 ft. on 28 lots; 5 lots vary
16 ft. = 20% waiver
windows face rear yards
from 17 ft. to 18 ft. 6 in.; 8 lots
are 20 ft. or more
Note 1: Front setbacks vary from unit to unit in many cases, however several streets repeat
the same setback from structure to adjoining structure therefore the appearance seems
regimented.
Note 2: Two lots with two story structures (Lots 2 & 39) are within 6 ft. of adjacent single
story units.
Note 3: Single story units are 18 ft. 6 in. high. Two story units are 23 ft. 6 in., which is within
the 25 ft. height limit for two story residences in an RPD Zone. No waivers are
required.
Note 4: All units next to the west property line (Moorpark Estates) of the subject property are
single story in height.
Note 5: * notes request for waiver, which exceeds 20%
Note 6: * on the attached chart of setback waivers supplied by the applicant identifies a
waiver request that exceeds 20%
C: Nelson Miller, Director of Community Development
File Copy
Chroni
Attachments:
Attachment 1 - Site Plan
Attachment 2 - Elevations pages 1 -4
Attachment 3 — Applicant Lot by Lot Waiver Request
006z"
ICI ; e --
�
POINDEXTER
PARK
Z'i
- - -- -- -- -- -�- - l__._
}M 4T(1Q7 A M q AN \
_ PIEIJG..._.__
- -- I
57R♦gT
M�
\
FLrMIe lMIID ' "M_'` .'� 1'LN1A IWr -i DI ftAxe R RNIe �) I� __,__
r, HAMA
��ii� I .w I .•.I � � r Q, I.n �I� r
r- —
y. a � � } .M.. o_ r. I ,-„�, RMI A r• ; n _ RNI A y r IY .._��
_— — b s
Me A* A f i it I -.Y_
AN,D W ' MMD MYD , 0.AlIA ;G • MDe Mre
nAMe r �I I. ItADe >fl MHe � i g� n.wD a . PLN/D a i � \ aARe �g� Mlle .v 81
h l m _ N h MMA
I
^.t W8F ^ ��
g F r
a
j�
w •, Irk, A y _....... �, � qµ A PLM! A fllN A 9 w_ ..p'.
r.
4
- ; -- - - 51E DATA LEOEINID
r- — -
i RESIDENTAL r_ < I i ._
I
HiTORr. aev sp.
51TE PLAN 40- 7- STOR7, 8775 ST,
MlMKH
FFzw SETBACK 7 S
•' MAINSTREET�w. DFm
REAR 7 F
. w -T Ai� k Fm SIDE TAW, 8 MET
Y�wwo ARCHImm.PIANNERS, INC. LMT COU T
MM.t.FrN..S —.S—A CABRILLO ECONOMIC DE\/ELOFMENT CORPORATION
,".°. 11011 AZAHAR STREET 2-STOW, «
✓_
roru WT SATICOY, CALIFORNIA T Mw. w
�yy
�I�
PROW ELEVATION
i r1l
RLAK ELEVATION
/ 1 SECTION A
MAINSTREET
ARCHITECTS •PIANNEM. INC.
vsnw amo... wei
Iw1 w.air • rWwlr -�r
N
INS
SIDE ELEVATION
SIDE ELEVATION
SECTION B
CABRILLO ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
11011 AZAHAR STREET
SATICOY. CALIFORNIA
-w
FIRST 11008
PLAN A
ONE STORY
DETALHED 5INOLE FAHLY RESIDENCE
3 DEDROOW2 BATH
1265 5F.
„1_
's
SIDE ELEVATION
SIDE ELEVATION
SECTION B
CABRILLO ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
11011 AZAHAR STREET
SATICOY. CALIFORNIA
-w
FIRST 11008
PLAN A
ONE STORY
DETALHED 5INOLE FAHLY RESIDENCE
3 DEDROOW2 BATH
1265 5F.
„1_
FRONT ELEVATION
REAR ELEVATION
t
G
SIDE ELEVATION
SIDE ELEVATION
SEOTION A SEOTION B
CABRILLO ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
11011 AZAHAR STREET
5ATICOY, CALIFORNIA
-, I FjLl� ,..I � T
I
FIRST FLOCK
PLAN A - ALTERNATE
ONE STORY
DETAG£D SINGLE FAMILY RMDBX,E
9 BEDROiOK'2 BATH
1265 5F.
�h'•CX
1 1.
N
MAINSTREET
ARCHrIBM PIANNEM INC.
rORWa Rise. UM
.ryr
T- Ci ra
Ir) r+eu � ngr)d -�r
FRONT ELEVATION
REAR ELEVATION
t
G
SIDE ELEVATION
SIDE ELEVATION
SEOTION A SEOTION B
CABRILLO ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
11011 AZAHAR STREET
5ATICOY, CALIFORNIA
-, I FjLl� ,..I � T
I
FIRST FLOCK
PLAN A - ALTERNATE
ONE STORY
DETAG£D SINGLE FAMILY RMDBX,E
9 BEDROiOK'2 BATH
1265 5F.
�h'•CX
1 1.
N
MONT ELEVATION
REAR ELEVATION
SECTION A
1
SIDE ELEVATION
SIDE ELEVATION
"ImI�
� gill
iO •I I_I
SECTION 8
GABRILLO ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
11011 AZAHAR STREET
5ATICOY, CALIFORNIA
ANN
V
SEGOIm BOOR rL.�N
- -- ----- - - - - --
- . -----------
FIRST /LOOK RAN
PLAN B
THIO STORY
DETACHED SIN6LE FAMILY RESIDENCE
4 BEDROOKQ BATH
WOD S.F.
W
MAINSTREET
AxcerreM-PIu+MM, urc.
�f `,
���4Y
y.
w�LfIIY191i�.84fi�
vcm.w a�oaoa..s.�
(wl w- au•uywlw -ua
a
1
SIDE ELEVATION
SIDE ELEVATION
"ImI�
� gill
iO •I I_I
SECTION 8
GABRILLO ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
11011 AZAHAR STREET
5ATICOY, CALIFORNIA
ANN
V
SEGOIm BOOR rL.�N
- -- ----- - - - - --
- . -----------
FIRST /LOOK RAN
PLAN B
THIO STORY
DETACHED SIN6LE FAMILY RESIDENCE
4 BEDROOKQ BATH
WOD S.F.
W
rRONT ELEVATION
REAR ELEVATION
SECTION A
LEFT SIDE E LZVATION
R16HT SIDE ELEVATION
SCGTION 6
CABRILLO ECONOMIC, DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
11011 AZAHAR. STREET
SATICOY. CALIFORNIA
I •,
- Mg-
I
53. . W-- ON.
PLAN B - alternate
TWO STORY
DETACHED SIN6LE FAMILY RESIDENCE
4 BEDR001412 BATH
1600 5F.
.I
V�
MAINSTREET
MMUOS-PLOMM, INC.
srtWw amr, Bum♦
A �
vciew. ousauiu wee
(wl w-un • rulwye• -gym
LEFT SIDE E LZVATION
R16HT SIDE ELEVATION
SCGTION 6
CABRILLO ECONOMIC, DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
11011 AZAHAR. STREET
SATICOY. CALIFORNIA
I •,
- Mg-
I
53. . W-- ON.
PLAN B - alternate
TWO STORY
DETACHED SIN6LE FAMILY RESIDENCE
4 BEDR001412 BATH
1600 5F.
.I
V�
Gisler Field, Tract 5161
List of Proposed Setbacks
Page 1 ATTACHMENT 3
Public
Minimum
Front Yard Front Yard
Interior
Interior
Streeet
Distance
Setback to Setback to
Side Yard
Side Yard
Side Yard
Between Rear Yard
Lot #
Porch
Gaaee
Setback
Setback
Setback
Structures Setback Notes
1
16.00
18.00
*
3.00
10.00
*
6.00 (1)16.00
2
19.00
21.50
*
3.00
5.00
*
6.00 (2) 20.00
3
23.00
25.50
*
3.00
5.00
*
8.00 (2) 16.00
4
19.00
21.50
*
3.00
5.00
*
8.00 (2) 20.00
5
23.00
25.50
*
3.00
5.00
*
8.00 (2) 16.00
6
19.00
21.50
*
3.00
5.00
*
8.00 (2) 20.00
7
23.00
25.50
*
3.00
10.00
*
8.00 (1) 16.00
8
18.00
20.50
5.00
8.00
*
8.00 (2) 16.00
maximum front yard setback
9
18.00
20.50
*
3.00
5.00
*
8.00 (2) 16.00
maximum front yard setback
10
18.00
20.50
*
3.00
5.00
*
8.00 (2) 16.00
11
18.00
20.50
*
3.00
5.00
*
8.00 (2) 16.00
12
18.00
20.50
*
3.00
5.00
*
8.00 (2) 16.00
13
18.00
20.50
*
3.00
9.00
*
8.00 (2) 16.00
maximum front yard setback
14
18.00
20.50
*
3.00-
9.00
*
8.00 (2) 16.00
maximum front yard setback
15
18.00
20.50
*
3.00
5.00
*
8.00 (2) 16.00
16
18.00
20.50
*
3.00
5.00
*
8.00 (2) 16.00
17
18.00
20.50
*
3.00
5.00
*
8.00 (2) 16.00
18
18.00
20.50
*
3.00
5.00
*
8.00 (2) 16.00
19
18.00
20.50
5.00
8.00
*
8.00 (2) 16.00
maximum front yard setback
20
18.00
20.00
5.00
8.00
*
8.00 (1) 16.00
maximum front yard setback
21
18.00
20.50
3.00
5.00
*
8.00 (2) 16.00
*
22
21.00
23.00
*
3.00
5.00
*
8.00 (2) 16.00
23
21.00
23.00
*
3.00
5.00
*
8.00 (1) 16.00
24
18.50
21.00
*
3.00
5.00
*
8.00 (2) 16.00
25
19.00
21.50
*
3.00
5.00
*
8.00 (1) 16.00
26
> 18.00
18.00
*
3.00
10.00
*
8.00 (1) 16.00
27
> 18.00
18.00.
*
3.00
10.00
8.00 (2) 16.00
28
> 18.00
18.00
*
3.00
5.00
*
8.00 (2) 18.50
could increase setback to garage
29
> 19.50
19.50
*
3.00
5.00
*
8.00 (2) 17.00
could increase setback to garage
30
18.00
20.50 •
*
3.00
5.00
*
8.00 (2) 17.50
31
18.00
20.50
*
3.00
5.00
*
8.00 (21) 16.00
32
19.00
21.00
*
3.00
5.00
*
8.00 (1) 16.00
33
18.00
20.50
5.00
_ 8.00
*
8.00(2) 16.00
maximum front yard setback
34
18.00
20.50
*
3.00
8.00
*
8.00(2) 44.50
maximum front yard setback
35
21.50
23.50
*
3.00
5.00
*
8.00(l) 24.00
36
18.00
20.00
*
3.00
5.00
*
8.00(l) 26.00
37
21.00
23.00
*
3.00
5.00
*
8.00(j) 18.00
38
18.00
18.00
*
3.00
5.00
*
8.00(2) 18.00
could increase setback to garage
39
>.18.00
18.00
*
3.00
5.00
*
6.00(j) 18.50
could increase setback to garage
40
> 20.00
20.00
*
3.00
10.00
*
6.00(l) 16.00
41
> 18.00
18.00
12.50
10.00
15.50(l) 18.50
could increase setback to garage
42
19.00
21.50
*
3.00
10.00
13.00(2) 28.00
43
28.00--
30.50
*
3.00
10.00
13.00(2) 20.00
Page 1 ATTACHMENT 3
Gisler Field, Tract 5161
List of Proposed'Setbacks
NOTE 2: * Notes request for waiver that exceeds 20%
NOTE 2: (1) Notes single story units
(2) Notes two story units
Page 2
000 :;at,
Public
Minimum
Front Yard
Front Yard
Interior
Interior
Streeet
Distance
Setback to
Setback to
Side Yard
Side Yard
Side Yard
Between Rear Yard
Lot #
Porch
Garage
Setback
Setback
Setback
Structures Setback Notes
44
19.00
21.50
* 3.00
10.00
13.00 (?) 28.00
45
27.00
29.50
* 3.00
14.00
13.00 (2) 20.00
46
18.00
20.50
* 3.00
17.00
* 8.00 (2) 16.00
47
18.00
20.50
5.00
6.50
* 8.00 (2) 16.00
48
18.00
20.50
* 3.00
8.50
* 9.50 (2) 16.00
49
18.00
20.50
* 3.00
16.00
* 11.50 (2) 16.00
50
18.00
20.50
* 3.00
16.00
12.00 (2) 16.00
51
18.00
20.50
* 3.00
9.00
* 10.00 (2) 16.00
52
18.00
20.50
5.00
7.00
* 8.00 (2) 16.00
53
18.00
20.50
* 3.00
17.00
* 8.00 (2) 16.00
54
21.50
23.50
* 3.00
5.00
* 8.00 (1) 16.00
55
18.00
20.00
* 3.00
5.00
* 8.00 (1) 19.50
56
22.00
24.00
* 3.00
5.00
* 8.00 (1) 16.00
57
20.00
22.00
* 3.00
5.00
* 8.00 (1) 18.50
58
23.00
25.00
* 3.00
5.00
* 8.00 (1) 16.00
59
> 20.00
20.00
* 3.00
10.00
* 8.00 (1) 22.00
NOTE 2: * Notes request for waiver that exceeds 20%
NOTE 2: (1) Notes single story units
(2) Notes two story units
Page 2
000 :;at,
With specific reference to the development of the affordable housing units, Developer shall
be required to adhere to the following schedule:
(1) In Phase 1, consisting or no more than twenty (20) units, four (4) units for
sale to low income households and one (1) unit for sale to very low income
households shall be constructed.
(2) In Phase 2, consisting or no more than twenty (20) units, four (4) units for
sale to low income households and one (1) unit for sale to very low income
households shall be constructed.
(3) In Phase 3, consisting or no more than twenty (20) units, three (3) units for
sale to low income households and two (2) units for sale to very low income
households shall be constructed.
elk, M:1;A 1011:1
The Developer shall prepare and submit Basic Concept and Schematic Drawings and
related documents for the development of the Site to the Agency for review and written
approval within the time established in the Schedule of Performance. Basic Concept and
Schematic Drawings shall include schematic plans, elevations and sections of the
improvements as they are to be developed and constructed on the Site, and shall be in
substantial conformance with the Developer's proposal submitted to Agency on June 17,
1997. The Site shall be developed as established in the Basic Concept and Schematic
Drawings and related documents except as changes may be mutually agreed upon between
the Developer and Agency. Any such changes shall be within the limitations of the Scope
of Development.
Specifically, the Developer shall be responsible for the construction of necessary storm
drainage improvements as identified by the City Engineer, and a forty foot (40') public street
within a fifty -three foot (53') right of way extending from Poindexter Avenue to approximately
the southerly entrance to Poindexter Park in accordance with City street standards and
requirements, and as stated in the Request of Proposal dated April 1997, and which shall
be recorded as a condition on the Final Tract Map. Agency or City shall reimburse the
Developer one -half of the cost of construction only of said improvements, except as
provided for in Section 03.05(3) herein. Developer shall be solely responsible for all costs
associated with the acquisition, surveying, map preparation, recordation and all other costs
associated with the need to acquire any property in addition to that transferred by Agency
pursuant to this Agreement, in order for the full construction of the improvements stated
herein, and in accordance with the Schedule of Performance (Attachment No.4) and Scope
of Development (Attachment No. 7).
Gisler Field DDA
Page 14 of 3 7
Further the Agency recognizes that the setback requirements of the units proposed by
Developer are not in compliance with the City's development standards and that
modifications are required from City to permit its construction. Agency further recognizes
that the furtherance of affordable housing may necessitate such modifications to setback
requirements and would support Developer's application to City for such modifications.
04.03 LANDSCAPING AND GRADING PLANS
The Developer shall prepare and submit to the Agency for its approval preliminary and final
landscaping and preliminary and finish grading plans for the Site. Those plans shall be
prepared and submitted within the times established in the Schedule for Performance. The
landscaping plans shall include a lighting program.
The landscaping plans shall be prepared by a professional landscape architect and the
grading plans shall be prepared by a licensed civil engineer. Such landscape architect
and/or civil engineer may be the same firm as the Developer's architect. Within the times
established in the Schedule of Performance (Attachment No. 4), the Developer shall submit
to the Agency for approval the name and qualifications of its architect, landscape architect
and civil engineer.
04.04 CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS AND RELATED DOCUMENTS FOR THE
SITE
The Developer shall prepare and submit construction drawings and related documents
(collectively called the "Drawings ") for the development pertaining to the Site to the Agency
for review (including but not limited to architectural review), and written approval in the
times established in the Schedule of Performance (Attachment No.4). Such construction
drawings related documents shall be submitted in two stages: Design Development
Drawings and Final Construction Drawings. Final Construction Drawings are hereby
defined as those in sufficient detail to obtain a building permit.
Progressively more detailed drawings and specifications will be promptly reviewed by the
Agency if developed as a logical evolution of drawings or specifications theretofore
approved. Any items so submitted and approved by the Agency shall not be subject to
subsequent disapproval by the Agency.
During the preparation of all drawings and plans the Agency and the Developer shall hold
regular progress meetings to coordinate the preparation of, submission to, and review of
construction plans and related documents by the Agency. The Agency and the Developer
shall communicate and consult informally as frequently as is necessary to insure that the
Gisler Field DDA
Page 15 of 37
OOOZ38