Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAGENDA REPORT 1999 0120 CC REG ITEM 09AFROM: DATE: MOORPARK CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT Honorable City Council 332'. 1 1 A*W �.w CITY OF MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA City Council Meeting of 10 I ACTION: _t 0121 11 U eel Lib lt'c hear i n� vleeti BY:. John E. Nowak, Assistant City Manager G 06 January 1999 (Council Meeting of 01- 20 -99) SUBJECT: Consider Action Regarding a Change of Control for the Cable Communications Franchise held by TCI Cablevision of California, Inc. BACKGROUND: In March 1996 the City Council approved transferring a cable television franchise to Telecommunications, Inc. of Ventura County (TCI) which is a part of TCI Cablevisions of California, Inc. The national parent company, Tele- Communications, Inc. is planning to merge with AT &T. The Moorpark Municipal Code requires City approval for the new company to assume the franchise in Moorpark. This matter was continued from the December 16, 1998 meeting at the request of TCI. DISCUSSION: TCI OF Ventura County currently holds a franchise to provide cable television service in the City of Moorpark. In June 1998 the parent company of TCI agreed to a merger with AT &T which would create a new wholly owned subsidiary of AT &T that would operate the cable television franchises. Section 5.06.312(A) of the Moorpark Municipal Code requires the City's consent for any change in control of a franchise prior to the change in control occurring (see attached). Section 5.06.320 of the Municipal Code provides for the City Council to charge a franchise fee upon a change of control that is in addition to any administrative fee. The fee is identified in Section 5.06.200(20) of the Code. TCI /AT &T Merger Meeting of 20 January 1999 Page 02 Staff has identified a franchise fee of $25,000 to be charged for the TCI /AT &T change of control approval. This is similar to the fee requirement in the Entertainment Express Ltd. extension resolution and as obtained from refuse franchise change of control. To date TCI has refused to agree to pay any franchise fee as part of the approval, in violation of the provisions of the Municipal Code. Staff believes this is sufficient grounds to deny the change of control application. Attached for the Council's consideration are two (2) resolutions. The first would approve the change in control with the franchise fee payment requirement. The second would deny the application request on the basis of TCI's refusal to comply with provisions of the Municipal Code. Neither action affects any other condition nor requirement of the current franchise held by TCI, which expires on December 20, 2000. This matter was noticed for a public hearing at the December 16, 1998 Council meeting. The hearing was opened and no one spoke at that time. The public hearing portion of the discussion was left open and the matter was continued to the January 20 meeting at TCI's request. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council determine if it desires to disapprove or approve a change in control of the cable communications franchise held by TCI Cablevision of California, Inc. and adopt the appropriate resolution. Attached: Resolution No. Resolution No. Municipal Code 5.06.320 99- "A "- Approving with fee 99- "B "- Denying Sections 5.06.200(20), 5.06.312(A) and 1 ! 1 ! . RESOLUTION NO. 99- "A" A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE CHANGE OF CONTROL OF THE CABLE COMMUNICATIONS FRANCHISE HELD BY TCI CABLEVISION OF CALIFORNIA, INC. WHEREAS, TCI Cablevision of California, Inc. through TCI of Ventura County(hereinafter "Franchisee ") is duly authorized to operate and maintain a cable communications system in Moorpark, California (hereinafter the "System ") by the City of Moorpark (hereinafter "Franchise Authority ") pursuant to a franchise (hereinafter "Franchise ") granted by the Franchise Authority in March 1996; and WHEREAS, pursuant to the Agreement and Plan of Restructuring and Merger among AT &T Corporation (hereinafter "AT &T "), a newly formed wholly owned subsidiary of AT &T (hereinafter "Merger Sub ") , and Tele- Communications, Inc., the parent of Franchisee (hereinafter "TCI "), dated as of June 23, 1998 (hereinafter "Merger Agreement ") , Merger Sub will merge with and into TCI with TCI as the surviving corporation in the merger, and as a result of the transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement, TCI will become a wholly owned subsidiary of AT &T (hereinafter "Transactions "); and WHEREAS, Franchisee will continue to hold the Franchise after consummation of the Transactions between AT &T and TCI; and WHEREAS, Federal Communication Commission's Form 394 with respect to the Transactions has been filed with the Franchise Authority; and WHEREAS, Section 5.06.312 of the Moorpark Municipal Code requires the City's consent for any change in control of a franchise prior to the change in control occurring; and WHEREAS, TCI has agreed to pay related administrative costs incurred by the City in preparation and review of this change in control request; and �r to Resolution No. 99- Page 2 WHEREAS, TCI has agreed to pay a "Franchise Transfer Fee" in the amount of $25,000 as part of the request for change of control; and WHEREAS, TCI and AT &T have requested consent by the Franchise Authority to the Transactions; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. The Franchise Authority hereby consents to and approves a change in control of the Franchise as a result of the Transactions to the extent such consent is required by the terms of the Franchise and the Moorpark Municipal Code. SECTION 2. That a Franchise Transfer Fee of $25,000 shall be due and payable upon the adoption of this resolution. SECTION 3. This Resolution shall become effective upon its adoption and compliance with Section 2 above. SECTION 4. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this resolution and shall cause a certified resolution to be filed in the book of original Resolutions. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 20th day of January 1999. ATTEST: Deborah S. Traffenstedt, City Clerk Patrick Hunter, Mayor RESOLUTION NO. 99- "B" A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA, DENYING THE CHANGE OF CONTROL OF THE CABLE COMMUNICATIONS FRANCHISE HELD BY TCI CABLEVISION OF CALIFORNIA, INC. WHEREAS, TCI Cablevision of California, Inc. through TCI of Ventura County (hereinafter "Franchisee ") is duly authorized to operate and maintain a cable communications system in Moorpark, California (hereinafter the "System ") by the City of Moorpark (hereinafter "Franchise Authority ") pursuant to a franchise (hereinafter "Franchise ") granted by the Franchise Authority in March 1996; and WHEREAS, pursuant to the Agreement and Plan of Restructuring and Merger among AT &T Corporation (hereinafter "AT &T "), a newly formed wholly owned subsidiary of AT &T (hereinafter "Merger Sub ") , and Tele- communications, Inc., the parent of Franchisee (hereinafter "TCI "), dated as of June 23, 1998 (hereinafter "Merger Agreement ") , Merger Sub will merge with and into TCI with TCI as the surviving corporation in the merger, and as a result of the transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement, TCI will become a wholly owned subsidiary of AT &T (hereinafter "Transactions "); and WHEREAS, Federal Communication Commission's Form 394 with respect to the Transactions has been filed with the Franchise Authority; and WHEREAS, Section 5.06.312 of the Moorpark Municipal Code requires the City's consent for any change in control of a franchise prior to the change in control occurring; and WHEREAS, Sections 5.06.200 and 5.06.320 allow the City to charge a franchise fee for any change of control; and WHEREAS, TCI has agreed to pay related administrative costs incurred by the City in preparation and review of this change in control request but have refused to pay and franchise fee as permitted by the Moorpark Municipal Code; and 00GO05 Resolution No. 99- Page 2 WHEREAS, TCI and AT &T recognize consent by the Franchise Authority to the Transactions is required; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. The Franchise Authority hereby denies approval of a change in control of the Franchise as a result of the Transactions on the basis of TCI's refusal to pay the franchise fee provided for by the Moorpark Municipal Code. SECTION 2. This Resolution shall become effective upon its adoption. SECTION 3. A copy of this Resolution shall be submitted to the Federal Communications Commission. SECTION 4. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this resolution and shall cause a certified resolution to be filed in the book of original Resolutions. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 20thth day of January 1999. Patrick Hunter, Mayor ATTEST: Denorah S. Trattenstedt, City Clerk i! 5.06.200 sion channel as defined by the Federal Communications Commission. 9. "City" means the city of Moorpark, a municipal corporation of the State of California, in its present incor- porated form or in any later reorganized, consolidated, enlarged or reincorporated form. 10. "Commence construction" means the point in time when the first connection is physically made to a utility pole, or undergrounding of cables is initiated, after pre- liminary engineering (strand mapping) and after all neces- sary permits and authorizations have been obtained. 11. "Commence operation" means the point in time when sufficient distribution facilities have been installed so as to permit the offering of cable service to a dwelling unit located within the franchise area and such services are actually subscribed to by a resident of the franchise area. 12. "Commercial use channel" means the channel capac- ity, if any, designated for commercial use as defined and required by federal law. 13. "Completion of construction" means the point in time when all distribution facilities have been installed by the grantee so as to permit the offering of cable service to all of the potential subscribers in the franchise area subject to the limitations of Section 5.06.804. 14. "Community access channel or access channel" means any channel or portion of a channel utilized for programming on a non -profit basis. 15. "Consent," "approval" or "agree." Such words or derivations of said words or words of similar import mean, unless otherwise expressly provided in this chapter or grantee's franchise ordinance, the prior approval, consent or agreement of the person holding the right to approve, consent or agree with respect to the matter in question, and "require" or "judgment" or "satisfy" or derivations of said words or words of similar import mean the require- ment, judgment or satisfaction of the person who may make a requirement or exercise judgment or who must be satis- fied, which approval, consent, agreement, requirement, judgment or satisfaction, unless otherwise expressly provid- ed in this chapter or the grantee's franchise ordinance, is not to be unreasonably withheld or delayed by the person holding the right to approve, consent or agree or make a requirement or judgment or who must be satisfied. 16. "Council" means the present governing body of the city or any future board constituting the legislative body of the city. 17. "Federal Communications Commission or FCC" means the present federal agency of that name as constituted by the Communications Act of 1934, or any successor agency created by the United States Congress. 68 18. "Franchise" means the right to construct, operate and maintain a cable television system using the city streets pursuant to the terms and condition of this chapter, the franchise ordinance and the acceptance of the franchise ordinance. Any reference to the "franchise" incorporates by reference this chapter, the franchise ordinance and the acceptance of the franchise ordinance. 19. "Franchise area" means the geographic area within the city designated in a franchise where the grantee may operate a cable television system. 20. "Franchise fee" means the tax, fee or assessment of any kind imposed by the city on a grantee or cable sub- scriber, or both, solely because of its status as such. The term "franchise fee" does not include: a. Any tax, fee or assessment of general applicability (including any such tax, fee, or assessment imposed on both utilities and grantee(s) or their services but not includ- ing a tax, fee, or assessment which is unduly discriminatory against grantee or cable subscribers); b. Capital costs which are required by the franchise to be incurred by grantee for PEG access facilities; c. Requirements or charges incidental to the awarding, enforcing, transfer or renewal of the franchise, including payments of bonds, consultants, administrative expenses, security funds, letters of credit, insurance, indemnification, penalties, or liquidated damages; or d. Any fee imposed under Title 17, United States Code. 21. "Franchise ordinance" means the ordinance granting a franchise to a person to operate a cable television system pursuant to the terms of this chapter. Any conflict between the terms of this chapter and the franchise ordinance shall be resolved in favor of the franchise ordinance. 22. "Grantee" means any person granted a franchise. 23. "Gross revenues" means any and all revenue or compensation in any form derived directly or indirectly by the grantee, its affiliates, subsidiaries, parents and any person in which the grantee has a financial interest, from the operation of the cable television system utilizing the public streets and rights -of -way in the city for which a franchise is required under this chapter, including, but not limited to, monthly subscriber fees for basic cable service, pay - television fees, pay - per -view fees and related per -event revenues, installation and reconnection fees, leased channel fees, fees paid for data transmission, converter rentals, advertising revenues, copyright fees, franchise fees or any other costs of doing business which are separately assessed to subscribers as a separate line item appearing on periodic statements for services rendered (except as provided below), provided, however, that the amount of gross revenues may be reduced by the amount of any bad debts written off by the grantee or refunds returned to persons, provided that the revenue with respect thereto had been included 0OW07 5.06.310 5.06310 Franchise nontransferrable. A. Except as otherwise provided in the franchise ordinance, the franchise shall not be transferred, sold, hypothecated, sublet or assigned, nor shall any of the rights or privileges therein be hypothecated, leased, assigned, sold or transferred, either in whole or in part, nor title there- to, either legal or equitable, or any right, interest or property therein, pass to or vest in any person, except the grantee, either by act of the grantee or by operation of law, without the prior consent of the city expressed by resolution. Nothing set forth in this chapter prevents the grantee from leasing or otherwise allocating use of any channel or pro- gramming time to any person, whether over a commercial use channel, local origination channel or otherwise. B. If the grantee transfers the franchise prior to obtain- ing city consent, twenty-five percent (25 %) of the gross revenues of the cable television system from the date of franchise transfer until the date of city consent shall be returned to the system's subscribers, on a per- capita basis. C. The city may not unreasonably withhold its consent to a franchise transfer. For the purpose of determining whether it consents to such change, transfer, or change in control, city may inquire into the qualifications of the prospective transferee or controlling party, and grantee shall assist city in any such inquiry. In seeking city's consent to any change of ownership or control, grantee shall have the responsibility of insuring that transferee completes an application in form and substance reasonably satisfactory to city, which application shall be submitted pursuant to Section 5.06.320 of this chapter. An application shall be submitted to city not less than ninety (90) days prior to the date of transfer. The grantee shall be required to estab- lish that it is in material compliance with its franchise. The transferee shall be required to establish that it possesses the qualifications and financial and technical capability to operate and maintain the system and comply with all franchise requirements for the remainder of the term of the franchise. If the city finds that the legal, financial, character, technical and other public interest qualities of the applicant are satisfactory, and that the proposed transferee has the capability to operate and maintain the system and comply with all franchise requirements for the then remaining term thereof, the city shall transfer and assign the rights and obligations of such franchise. The city may condition the transfer to insure the transferee is in material compliance, and remains in material compliance with, the franchise. (Ord. 133 § 1 (part), 1990) 5.06.312 Change in control. A. City consent is further required for any change in control of grantee, pursuant to subsection 5.06.3 10 above. "Change of control" means any sale, transfer or acquisition 70 of grantee, grantee's parent, the parent of grantee's parent, etc. If grantee or its parent(s) is a corporation, any acquisi- tion of more than 10% of grantee's voting stock by a person or group of persons acting in concert, whom already own less than 50% of the voting stock, is deemed a change in control. B. Any change of control of the grantee occurring without prior city approval shall constitute a material breach of the franchise. (Ord. 133 § 1 (part), 1990) 5.06.314 Franchise area — Annexations. A. The franchise ordinance shall establish the franchise area. B. Territory annexed to the city which is not within the franchise area of an existing franchise may be added to an existing franchise pursuant to council resolution adopt- ed after conducting a noticed public hearing, provided that such new territory shall be deemed a part of the franchise area of any grantee authorized to serve the entire geographic area of the city without action by the council. (Ord. 133 § 1 (part), 1990) C. Territory annexed to the city that is already covered by an existing franchise or license granted by another public entity but where the grantee of such franchise or license has not commenced installation of a cable television system in the area of such annexed territory shall be deemed not to be served by a franchise or license, and all rights ac- quired under said franchise or license in the area of such annexed territory shall terminate by operation of law as of the effective date of the annexation. D. Territory annexed to the city that is already served by a franchise or license issued by another public entity, may continue to be served by the grantee under said fran- chise or license for the balance of the term of said franchise or license, subject to the provisions of said franchise or license and the provisions of this chapter, and provided the franchise fees, which the city may establish by resolu- tion up to the maximum permitted by law, are paid. (Ord. 133 § 1 (part), 1990) 5.06.316 Franchise applications. A. Any person may apply for the grant of a new franchise. B. The city may, by advertisement or any other means, solicit applications for new franchises pursuant to a request for proposals. C. Upon receipt of an application, the city manager shall cause to be prepared a report, including his recom- mendations respecting such application, which shall be filed with the council and each applicant. Upon receipt of said report, a public hearing shall be noticed to consider the approval of the application. tl D. The city may, at any time prior to the close of the public hearing, require the applicant to provide supple- mentary information reasonably necessary to determine whether the application should be approved. E. Following the public hearing, the council, at its discretion, shall determine whether to approve the applica- tion. In making its determination, the council shall give due consideration to the quality of the service proposed, income to the city, experience, character, technical and financial responsibility of the applicant, and any other considerations deemed pertinent by the council for safe- guarding the interests of the city and public. (Ord. 133 § 1 (part), 1990) 5.06317 Multiple franchises. A. City may grant any number of franchises, either on a city-wide basis or for a limited service area. City may limit the number of franchises granted, based upon, but not necessarily limited to, the following considerations: 1. The capacity of the public rights -of -way to accom- modate the facilities of two or more cable systems. 2. The benefits that may accrue to cable subscribers as a result of cable system competition, such as lower rates and improved service. 3. The disadvantages that may result from cable system competition, such as the requirement for multiple pedestals on residents' property, and the disruption arising from numerous excavations of the rights -of -way. B. City may require that any new grantee be responsible for its own underground trenching and the costs associated therewith, if, in city's opinion, the rights -of -way in any particular area cannot feasibly and reasonably accommodate additional cables. C. In the event that, subsequent to the effective date of this chapter, city grants an additional franchise for a cable communications system on terms that, on a whole, are more favorable or less burdensome than those contained in an existing grantee's franchise granted pursuant to this chapter, such more favorable or less burdensome terms shall be automatically extended to such existing grantee to the effect that any provision in such grantee's franchise which is inconsistent with such more favorable or less burdensome terms shall be superseded by such more favorable or less burdensome terms. Such more favorable or less burdensome terms shall be effective with respect to the grantee's franchise as of the effective date of the franchise granted to such other person. In order to invoke the benefit of this clause such existing grantee shall notify city in writing of the specific terms in the proposed fran- chise that are more favorable or less burdensome than the terms of the existing franchise prior to the public hearing described at Section 5.06.316, provided that city has given 71 5.06.316 such existing grantee at least thirty (30) days prior written notice of such public hearing, together with a copy of the proposed franchise. (Ord. 133 § 1 (part), 1990) 5.06.318 Franchise renewal. The city may establish franchise renewal procedures by resolution subject to applicable federal law. (Ord. 133 § 1 (part), 1990) 5.06.320 Franchise processing costs. Any application for either a new franchise grant, a franchise renewal or a franchise transfer, shall be made in a manner prescribed by the city manager, and shall include an application fee, in an amount to be set by city resolution, to cover the cost of all direct and indirect administrative expenses, including consultants and attorneys, necessary to adequately analyze the application. In addition, the grantee shall reimburse the city for all out -of- pocket processing costs, which shall include, but not be limited to, costs of publications of notices, development and publication of relevant franchise ordinances and agreements, and any other out -of- pocket not covered by the application fees, incurred by the city in its study and evaluation of applications. The city may periodically bill the applicant for such additional amounts to reimburse the city for ad- ministrative expenses incurred in addition to the application fee. The bills shall be supported with evidence of the expense or cost incurred. The applicant shall pay such bills within thirty (30) days of receipt. These franchise processing costs are over and above any construction inspection and permit fees and the fran- chise fees specified in this chapter or the franchise ordi- nance. (Ord. 133 § 1 (part), 1990) 5.06322 Franchise fee. A. Every grantee shall pay a franchise fee to the city in the amount designated in the franchise ordinance. The city, upon request, shall be furnished a statement, either audited and certified by an independent certified public accountant or certified by a financial officer of the grantee, reflecting the total amounts of gross revenues and all computations for the period covered by the payment. City shall have the right to conduct an independent audit of those records of grantee reasonably necessary to determine gross revenues, and if such audit indicates a franchise fee under- payment of three percent (3 %) or more, the grantee shall assume all costs of such an audit. B. Acceptance of a franchise fee payment for more than four (4) years after its receipt shall amount to a release and accord and satisfaction as to any claim the city may have for additional sums payable. The grantee shall maintain gross revenue records for a minimum of four (4) years. (JOGW9