Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAGENDA REPORT 1999 0203 CC REG ITEM 09BCITY OF MOORPARK AGENDA REPORT CITE' OF''9OOPPkP . c AT,rT -oRNIA of ACTION: E l k d1'5CUS5i o n. __� Lt 14k, hearin Conf'. _4m BY:- -- _ TO: Honorable City Council FROM: Nelson Miller, Director of Community Development Prepared by: Wayne Loftus, Planning Manager John Libiez, Principal Planner DATE: January 21, 1999 (City Council Meeting of 2/3/99) SUBJECT: CONSIDER MOORPARK HIGHLANDS SPECIFIC PLAN PROJECT (SPECIFIC PLAN 95 -2 /SPECIFIC PLAN NO.2, GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 95 -2, AND ZONE CHANGE 95 -4), APPLICANT: MORRI SON- FOUNTAINWOOD -AGOURA. (Continued from January 20, 1999) BACKGROUND: City Council initiated the Public Hearing on the Moorpark Highlands Specific Plan project on January 20, 1999, and continued consideration with the Public Hearing open. The Specific Plan No. 2 project and the certification of the Environmental Impact Report were recommended for adoption to City Council by the Planning Commission, upon completion of public hearings before the Commission, subject to modifications contained with Resolution No. PC -98 -362, which was included with the staff report for January 20, 1999. The applicant has agreed to extend the previously agreed upon date for certification action on the EIR from January 18, 1999, to March 26, 1999. DISCUSSION: Council received testimony from staff, the project applicant and four citizens at the meeting of January 20, 1999. Council identified issues and concerns related to the project to staff, and continued consideration to the February 3, 1999, meeting. Issues identified were: 1) Possibility to relocate "C Street further north in the project; 2) Incorporation of larger more WOR_PRI SERMhomeJ ofdersVLibiezlV &p2stfrpt1399.doc CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT SPECIFIC PLAN NO.2 FEBRUARY 3, 1999 Page 2 transitional lots to the north end of the project; 3) Include equestrian oriented lots within the project, preferably to the north end; 4) Relocate middle school site and park; 5) Provide discussion of regional circulation issues; 6) Lower the density of the project; 7) Connection of nature preserve to Happy Camp Canyon Regional Park; 8) More definition of the product type within the multiple- family planning area; 9) affordable housing; 10) L.A. Avenue improvement project; 11) Circulation connection to Broadway. Responses to the issues identified are contained in the following discussion. Where issues appeared to be related, staff combined the discussion of them. Council may wish to identify any other issues /concerns related to the. Relocate "C" Street further North The proposed alignment of "C" Street connects with the alignment proposed for the connection across Happy Camp Canyon Regional Park from Specific Plan No. 8 property (Hidden Creek Ranch Specific Plan) . Placing the alignment further to the north would create greater impacts related to grading due to creation of severe cut slopes in order to grade in the road to provide access to or through Happy Camp Regional Park. A Broadway connection across Happy Camp Canyon Regional Park was previously considered when the Hidden Creek Ranch project was evaluated as part of the regional circulation pattern and the southerly alternative was preferred by Council and the County due to its impacts upon Happy Camp. Locate larger lots to the north end of the project/include equestrian lots in northern end /lower the density of the Droiect somewhat. The two northern most Planning Areas (Areas 8 & 9) are proposed at a density of 2.5 dwelling units per acre. Lots ranging in size from 10,000 Sq. Ft. to 12,000 Sq. Ft. would be feasible with this density. Lots with a minimum of 10,000 sq. ft. do allow for equestrian uses in a Rural Exclusive (RE) zone). This designation could be applied to these lots to require a minimum of 10,000 square feet and Ii f. CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT SPECIFIC PLAN NO.2 FEBRUARY 3, 1999 Page 3 to allow equestrian uses. Under the RE designation, each lot could have the equivalent of two horses. Planning Areas 8 & 9 could be further expanded by eliminating the portions of the open space lot (Area 13) adjacent to the northern and western property boundaries. General Plan Land Use Element Policy 11.2 requires a minimum 200 foot setback when new residential development is adjacent to agricultural uses. The required 200 foot setback could be incorporated within the rear portion of these lots, rather than in an open space lot, to provide larger lots around the periphery of the project. Relocate middle school and park. This has been referred to the applicant for analysis of potential revisions to land use and circulation plans. He is scheduling a meeting with the School District to discuss issues relating to school site relocation. In the Land Use Plan that the City Council had reviewed in June, 1996, the proposed school site was located at the southeast corner of Spring Road and "C" Street, with a proposed park site at the northeast corner of Spring Road and "C" Street. When the Gnatcatcher was discovered on the property, the school and park site were shifted to the north side of "C" Street. This also addressed concerns regarding the location of the school on a major arterial (Spring Road) and along a four lane arterial ( "C" Street) . The park was also relocated to reduce the grading which otherwise would be necessary to grade the large hill at that location. The previous park area is now proposed for open space. Regional Circulation /connection to Broadway. A regional circulation concept has been adopted within the City's General Plan Circulation Element. Key ingredients to the circulation system within the City's Planning Area (Incorporated area, Sphere and Area of Interest) are shown on Figure 2, Highway Network, of the Circulation Element (Attachment A). Pages 18 & 20 (Attachment B) of the Element define the improvements necessary to provide that 6 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT SPECIFIC PLAN NO.2 FEBRUARY 3, 1999 Page 4 regional network. These include the provision of the east - west SR118 arterial bypass from the SR118 /SR23 connector to LA Avenue west of Butter Creek Road; provision of a north - south SR23 arterial bypass from the SR118 /SR23 connector to Broadway Road; extension of Spring Road north to the SR 23 arterial bypass. The provision of a 118 bypass has been viewed as a critical element in relieving traffic congestion and maintaining levels of service on Los Angeles Avenue, especially in consideration of increased regional traffic, as well as build out of the City. Specific Plan No. 2 provides opportunities to acquire the reservation for the SR 23 and SR 118 arterial bypass routes through the project. This would satisfy part of the regional circulation needs. Broadway Road lies approximately 3300 feet north of Specific Plan No. 2. Attachment C displays the relationship between SP -2 and the potential extension of the SR23 bypass to Broadway Road. The projected SR23 alignment would require the bypass to transect locally unique agricultural lands (lands of lesser soils quality than prime farm lands, but used for the production of the State's leading agricultural crops) currently under citrus production within the jurisdiction of the County of Ventura in order to connect to Broadway Road. Broadway Road, east of Walnut Canyon Road, would also likely need to be substantially graded and reconstructed. The extension of Spring Road and proposed "C" Street through the project site could fulfill the General Plan requirement for Spring Road connection to the future SR23 bypass, and gets trucks off of Walnut Canyon Road consistent with prior City Council direction. Until such time as the full bypass is developed, an alternate connection to SR23 is needed. The applicant's design allows connection via a "T" intersection at Walnut Canyon Road. Attachment D shows an alignment for Spring Road merging to Walnut Canyon Road through a sweeping curve. This alignment was part of a Walnut Canyon Road study performed by Potter & Flowers in 1980 for the County of Ventura and is similar to the alternate alignment staff had furnished the applicant prior to Planning Commission considerations. Connection could also be achieved in the 000010 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT SPECIFIC PLAN NO.2 FEBRUARY 3, 1999 Page 5 future by creating an interchange or intersection at "C" Street and SR23. This would require a change in the project street design such that Spring Road would make a gentle radius transition to become the "C" Street alignment. A connector street could then be constructed from Walnut Canyon Road to Spring Road within the project. Another alternative which was analyzed would be to extend Spring Road along the easterly side of the hill area in Planning Area 13 to the north property line. A street would be developed from that point to connect to Walnut Canyon Road to the west. Due to topography this roadway would require considerable grading and drainage improvements to be functional. Such a roadway may also induce impacts to the adjacent agricultural properties. There are concerns relating to the extension of Spring Road to Broadway Road in that any routing between the applicant's property and Broadway Road would create conflicts with the future SR23 alignment and lands under citrus and agricultural production. The County has requested a fee agreement similar to what was executed for the Hidden Creek Ranch Specific Plan to mitigate impacts to County roads. Connection of Nature preserve to Happy Camp The Habitat Conservation Area to be established under a Habitat Conservation Plan (HCP) for the California Gnatcatcher population on the specific plan site covers the lower one third of the project and includes the primary areas of coastal sage scrub within the project. The gnatcatcher has not been found within other areas of the project or within Happy Camp Canyon Regional Park. This is probably related to lower habitat values in these areas. The SR23 and SR 118 alignments would isolate the HCP from the developed portion of the project. These alignments would also preclude direct access to Happy Camp Canyon Park. The HCP will require fencing and access limitations for the 94 acres in order to prevent impacts to the species. The HCP purpose is not to create a public access nature study area, but rather to create a restricted, limited, ecosystem in which the nesting /resident bird 00001,1 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT SPECIFIC PLAN NO.2 FEBRUARY 3, 1999 Page 6 population may be sustained. Federal law prohibits any taking of the species. The definition of taking includes potential loss or damage to habitat which might cause the species extinction or loss. Therefore, intrusion by humans or other species, particularly domestic animal varieties, must be discouraged in order to satisfy Endangered Species Act provisions. More definition of the product type within the affordable and higher density housing areas. Area 7 of the Specific Plan has been proposed for a density of fifteen dwelling units per acre to provide for a potential multi- family housing project for rental units meet affordable housing requirements. This would be similar to other apartments projects within the City. Options for creating affordable housing. Concerns were expressed regarding provision of affordable housing within the project area. These included potential to provide for -sale products as well as providing affordable housing outside the project area. Discussions on other projects have indicted a subsidy in the range of $5,000 to $10,000 per unit, or more, on the non - affordable units would be needed to provide affordable housing. Considering the infrastructure requirements and type of community proposed, an even higher subsidy may be required to provide for -sale products within the project area. Some of the options to provide for affordable housing off -site are identified below. ■ Acquire underutilized residentially designated property within the Downtown Specific Plan area; develop upgrades to infrastructure to serve the property; develop affordable rental or senior housing upon the acquired property. ■ Require the developer to provide a set -aside account to be used for the write down of costs to first time buyers or move up buyers within the project to make market rate units within the 000OU CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT SPECIFIC PLAN NO.2 FEBRUARY 3, 1999 Page 7 project affordable to middle and upper middle income families. ■ Require developer to enter into limited partnership arrangement with the Redevelopment Agency to effect production of affordable housing projects on agency property designated for such use. (Fixed term /fixed amount.) ■ Pay City of Moorpark an in lieu fee in an amount agreed upon within the project development agreement to benefit the City's affordable housing program. Los Angeles Avenue Improvement Project. The Public Works Director has provided a memo to clarify the status of the Los Angeles Avenue Improvement Project.(Attachment E) Staff Recommendation: Accept additional testimony, discuss the project, and continue to date certain. Attachments: A. General Plan Circulation Element, Figure 2, Highway Network B. General Plan Circulation Element Extract, Pages 18 & 20 C. Regional Circulation Exhibit D. Walnut Canyon Road Alignment Study, 1980 diagram E. January 20, 1999, Public Works Director Memo: L.A. Avenue East Improvement Project OW013 1 sv w m `1 RYA n v ' OUN ; 77pR P 1 ; DO L_._._._._._._._ ._._._._._._._...._._._._._._._ 0 2000 1000 6000 vOh LF-iiyND FREEWAY INTUCRANGE sDC -LArrE ARTERIAL FOUR4ANE ARTERIAL Rte— RURAL COLLECTOR_ LOCAL COLLECTOR ` SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION RR CROSSING aAT-GRADE GRADE SEPARATED RR CROSSING .......... CITY LUAIT BOUNDARY ■tttttt■ SR-113 FREEWAY CORRIDOR m—p bee ea pueq prm.c .lipmena f« fw«e p.n1a Pleue .Z Y L W Oq d Mmry.rt p.Wi� wain Depum.w .d G�mmu.fy Dc.-bpm i Dcp+nmea /« .00ioasal in(o�dYO� r W< ff i .• r _._._._. `.% n SR-118 1 1 1 FIGURE 2 CITY OF MOORPARK GENERAL PLAN CIRCULATION ELEMENT HIGHWAY NETWORK May 13.1992 (MO14 ATTACHMENT A One of the policies included will attempt to achieve and system performance standard system and as a basic design CIRCULATION SYSTEM { in this Element states that the City maintain level of service "C" as a for traffic volumes on the roadway guideline for roadways in the City. The goals and policies included in the Circulation Element emphasize the need for a circulation system that is capable of serving both existing and future residents while preserving cormunity values and character. The location, design, and constituent modes of the circulation system have major impacts on air quality, noise, community appearance, and other elements of the environment. The highway network designated in the Circulation Element is illustrated in Figure 2, and indicates all of the designated freeways, six -lane arterials, four -lane arterials, and rural collectors. In addition, a selected number of designated local collectors, which carry through traffic, are indicated on the map. Any permanent closure to through traffic or relocation of the designated arterials and collectors will require —� Amendment. Hiahway facilities are shown witn the current Ciao limits as well as for the surrounding lannin area that has bee defined for the General Plan rinria *e Existing and potential future traffic signal locations within the City limits are also indicated on the highway network map, as are existing and potential at -grade and grade separated railroad crossing locations. Traffic signal warrants are satisfied for the locations shown here based on current traffic projections. Traffic signalization may be required at minor street and driveway locations not shown on the Circulation Element highway network map. A grade separated railroad crossing is shown only for the future SR -118 bypass arterial crossing. Grade separation is not considered feasible at the four existing railroad crossings (Gabbert Road, Moorpark Avenue, Spring Road, and Los Angeles Avenue). The roadway network in the Circulation Element indicates a number Of improvements with regard to the existing roadway system in the Moorpark planning area. The following are the more important improvements that will need to be implemented: • Connection of the SR -118 and SR -23 freeways with new interchanges at Collins Drive and `Princeton Avenue. 18 00001.5 ATTACHMENT B :<w'w\wwy -Wf w�w :w'rdWi.'+"r'iWr:witviW J1. r:: wwwWwA ::ww:wv..rfrY..y�y v.Lw.li+f. Kerr.. r. ww++ w+ wwwwvwwv .4.rwwx.wv.(a'LxwWv.HwI • Provision of an east /west SR -118 arterial bypass from the SR -23 /SR -118 connector to Los Angeles Avenue west of Butter Creek Road, without a connection to Walnut Canyon Road, and recognition of a potential future SR -118 freeway extension west of the City limits. • Provision of a north /south SR -23 arterial bypass from the SR -23 /SR -118 connector to Broadway Road. • Extension of Spring Road north to the SR -23 arterial bypass. • Provision of a local collector system to serve circulation needs in the northwest portion of the City. Local collectors added to the existing circulation system include an extension of Casey Road to Gabbert Road, "C" Street between Grimes Canyon Road and the SR- 23 arterial bypass, and "D" Street between Princeton Avenue and the SR -23 arterial bypass. • Provision of a roadway system to serve circulation needs in the Carlsberg Specific Plan (Moorpark Highlands) area in the southeast portion of the City. Roadways added to the existing circulation system include an extension of Science Drive from New Los Angeles Avenue to Tierra Rejada Road, and an extension of Peach Hill Road to Science Drive. • Provision of an eastern extension of Broadway Road potentially connecting with Alamos Canyon Road and the SR -118 freeway to serve circulation needs of potential future development in the portion of the planning area northeast of the City limits. 20 000016 RO AUWA-Y ROAD 59a. Oil Tanks - MOORPARK SPECIFIC PLAN NO.2 City of Moorpark, California Unique Agricultural Lands � 10 {, \1 61(i I r / 0 IN Vo AN JI TA 76 ';! -- _ � �� � DIY!' � \ •� � li , � ���� -' -� - '• l �\ `V �• � •��� iFy .1 V � —. \ , �1I � i f���� ` mil, �il 'PARK DRiVE 111 r, -• - � r j \`�.,�� , i �j ^� �_��1`�"�:/ l •i ' SR 1 L�` SEY ROAD _ u ;, I•. 1 SR 118 Of w GH STREE •. � i ..' i ( ,^ \ Vim- � � � �, �� ..all \ —,a .L:�• _ OA]tPSl'l{ 1 1 0 (6M 5:j1UCL. • is I.. 1 1 qj ,S i m is V 1 ely LOS "A � •- : r it , ��� GEL • � � °o ,Res . L 'ea' � .. I .� ' • � /,. � �. _.... , . , . C III;\ �..�t , 7� nTrPAr -MMENT c •t• •I '1 � lr`l. fir `t,1u�'' `,' 'it /... ' ,: � I 1 I •,.• ,y I 1' J� ` 'c;ti � r I` I'j 1� /, pw �til• ._tit DM _ O-Wt),40 • \ ` } J . ;' 'r� •�Q'9od�. i�Tc _ -. - 2�j BM 8bG 9Q6 (•a s a r r\ , S ,) I \` d 1, I �r� ' I r� `; l -_,l ' -� \ • � �� `! ,'�' `� ���,' � N I I•. i 'rJ 1 ``�\ •N'• g'`� • ,�r.. .. � S .�_. � , :`Il'•.: �J�T /l (1� -v� '' J�r'y •, )Ql ��.�� '. �i. ..74 t l • l � �.' .�. ,, `•' `1 u'.- ; rai, c V .. T w `fir` ll 11 . 1_ / 969 � ( r�� I 1 , I ,•; x„ � c:. � ` t' .,) /tl it - I i ^-. ,, !r 't x •`a• w w �. 1 \/ , - I � l\ l/' �� -;:. .� )I /( �• y •i r II � .IMF n •• .. � �: 1' J ` —,• 'r 'r r ,.' l • . 1\ H y• , �. ,I� 1 yy 11 . f / t - ell. • ; 1 .9 .. i.. Lo., .r w ^1 . i `. ". : • sus es It iinuingrG "' -1�;» •J. !'' Ytrg1n18'�7. ' '/� High Sch..��� r• 4.: -� '�a. '1 �:�c % I �:•Colonyl •i:- '1 •�1'$.'i �Zi:y Y:l _•. .a��uiN� � r I ... -..ly • PAG,pIC''� z• ••eM;oy s'_ �!••_ �•- 1- Y�.J:�I9 \ Tpl N .� jtl�.r•- ..;..��� .... Moorpark ., SOS 1Imil i-k ' :I•• ::: :i. Little i m i Valley •• , :i • �.� . «�t.� �/�• p 1' � . 1 t —tiy\� 1 ��^'��: •'�' »�E '� r,� �1 j • 1 ... fIY1��I�YO��Y / 1 ' �r�; ,r �'�..II�IrI'..� • "'� •gip Res A. �`• ^^� / • 1 �' J} �(�.�/• i •'� • ' ,1 V f"• �' �. r Vii. /'• -, \ � •V� S�� ' ``•,•� ms's•• ■ ■ ■s'a -• i�� /.'.�('` 000018 M E M O R A N D U M TO: The Honorable City Council FROM: Kenneth C. Gilbert, Director of Public Works �(C& ` DATE: January 20, 1999 SUBJECT: Los Angeles Avenue East Improvement Project Per the City Council's request at the January 20'h meeting, the following is a brief summary of the status of the subject project. 1. Scope of Project: Reconstruction of Los Angeles Avenue west of Condor Drive to provide for two travel lanes, a center paved median and eight feet of paved surface beyond the side lines, within an eighty -eight foot wide right -of -way. 2. Right -of -Way Width: The eighty -eight feet (88') of right -of- way will accommodate, should the future need arise, the widening of the street to four lanes. 3. Design: The preliminary design has been completed. The engineer is finalizing construction and easement requirements for the retaining walls. 4. Environmental Clearance: It is anticipated that the City Council will consider the Negative Declaration for this project on March 3, 1999. 5. Record of Survey: The City Engineer has retained the services of a surveyor to prepare a Record of Survey to identify the design center line of the proposed street improvements, as well as existing lot lines. This document will make it easier to prepare the legal descriptions for the street right -of -way parcels to be acquired. It is anticipated that this Record of Survey will be recorded by May 1999. 6. Legal Descriptions for Right -of -Way Deeds: As soon as enough information is known from the preliminary (unrecorded) Record of Survey, the Engineer will prepare legal descriptions for the street rights- of- way..This task will very likely start in April 1999. 7. Right -of -Way Agent: It is the intent of staff to recommend retaining the services of a right -of -way Agent to assist the City in property acquisition efforts. It is anticipated that this selection will occur prior to June 1999. 000015 a TTa nLTA,rL amm " Los Angeles Avenue - East January 20, 1999 Page 2 8. Acquisition Efforts: With approximately thirty parcels to acquire, it is not known how long the right -of -way acquisition efforts will take. 9. Appraisal Sezvices: It is very likely that the City will also have to retain the services of a property appraiser. 9. Final Design: Work on the final design will be deferred until the right -of -way acquisition efforts are near completion. 10.Retaining Walls: At the appropriate time, the City Council will be asked to approve the type of retaining walls (crib wall, concrete wall, etc.) to be used. 11- Schedule: In the opinion of staff, this project has proceeded, and is proceeding, on a schedule typical of this type of a project. No extraordinary measures have been taken, or are planned to be taken, to expedite or "fast track" any portion of the project development. City resources devoted to the development of all of the City's planned capital improvements are limited. Accordingly, work continues on several projects simultaneously. It is the view of staff that the subject project has received its fair share of attention. cc: Steven Kueny, City Manager rpt \caey plan.ntc 0 UUV2U