HomeMy WebLinkAboutAGENDA REPORT 1999 1006 CC REG ITEM 10GTO:
FROM:
DATE:
-12 . 22-. (C.)
ITEM /p.
CITY OF MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA
City Council Meeting
ACTION•��! i (_, ^.`� (il i P(.'tPL� //,' t't °l in
MOORPARK CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA REPORT
Honorable City Council
Deborah S. Traffenstedt, City Clerk I-DeFF
September 30, 1999 (CC Meeting of 10/6/99)
SUBJECT: Consider Response from California Transportation
Commission Concerning Prohibiting Trucks on State Route
118 from State Route 23 West to State Route 126
BACKGROUND
At the City Council's May 5, 1999 meeting, Resolution No. 99 -1604
was adopted requesting that the California Transportation
Commission (CTC) direct the California Department of Transportation
(Caltrans) to proceed with efforts necessary to prohibit trucks on
State Route (SR) 118 from SR -23 west to SR -126.
A response letter was received dated June 2, 1999 and is attached.
The attached letter provides an overview of the local agency truck
restriction process, which requires a public review period and
preparation of a Truck Restriction Report. The proposed truck
restriction is subject to California Environmental Quality Act
review.
The first step in the process would be to adopt a resolution
informing the appropriate Caltrans district office of the proposed
restriction and including in the resolution the California Vehicle
Code Section providing the authority for the truck restriction.
STAFF RECOMNJENDATION
Direct staff as deemed appropriate.
Attachment: Letter from CTC dated 6/2/99
0004GS
EDWAIE. SYLVESTER, Chakni n
JERFAAAN F. NALUSEY
JAMES W ;KELLOGG
ROGER & KOZBERG
DANA W, REED
ESTEBASk F- TORRES
ROBERT Al WOLF
SENATOR BETTY KARNETTE. Ex Offido
ASSEMBLYMAN TOM TORLAK,SON. Ex Ortido
ROBERT I. REMEN, Executive Director
June 2, 1999
STATE OF CAUFOFM
CALIFORNIA TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
1120 N STREET, MS-62
P.O. BOX 942873
SACRAMENTO 942734=1
FAX (916) 8532134
FAX(916)654-4364
(916) 6541245
Mayor Patrick Hunter
City of Moorpark
799 Moorpark Avenue
Moorpark, CA 93021
Dear Mayor Hunter:
GRAY DA1114
GOVERNOR
We have received your transmittal of Council Resolution No.. 99-1604 requesting that the
California Transportation Commission direct the California Department of Transportation
( Caltrans) to proceed with efforts necessary to prohibit trucks on State Route 118, between State
Routes 23 and 126.
In accordance with California Vehicle Code Sections 21101, 35701, 35702, and related sections,
Caltrans has prepared an overview of the local agency truck restriction process (see enclosure).
This process requires a public review period and preparation of a Truck Restriction Report (see
Truck Restriction Report Checklist, enclosed). We recommend that you coordinate your
proposal with:
Mr. Frank Quon, Caltrans District 7 Traffic Operations Division Chief, (213) 897 -0362
Ventura County
the City of Somis
any other local agencies that may be affected by a truck restriction
For assistance in satisfying the requirements of the truck restriction process, please contact Mr.
Asif Haq, Chief, Office of Commercial Vehicle Operations and Permits at (916)654 -6099.
Sincerely,
EDWARD B. SYLVESTER
Chairman
cc: Asif Haq, Caltrans
Harried Benouar, Caltrans
L_,8fephen Maller, Caltrans
Enclosures (2)
00046G
OVERVIEW OF THE LOCAL AGENCY TRUCK RESTRICTION PROCESS
For State Highways in accordance with CVC Sections 21101, 35701, 35702, and their related sections
1. Local Agency Prepares a Draft Truck Restriction Ordinance Or Resolution.
The local agency initiates the review process for restricting trucks on a state highway by
preparing a draft ordinance or resolution and informing the appropriate Caltrans district
office of the proposed restriction. The ordinance or resolution must cite the CVC
Section providing the authority for the truck restriction. Caltrans districts should notify
the Office of Commercial Vehicle Operations and Permits in writing as soon as possible
after learning of a truck restriction proposal. Districts should request and forward copies
of draft ordinances or resolutions from the local agencies to the Office of Commercial
Vehicle Operations and Permits. These will also be forwarded to Headquarters Legal
and Environmental Programs for review.
2. Local Agency Prepares An Initial Study.
The local agency prepares an initial study. The initial study provides the information
necessary to justify the proposed restriction and may also indicate if the proposed
restriction is subject to CEQA review. The initial study allows the preliminary submittal
of information by Caltrans, local agencies, California Highway Patrol staff, as well as
initial comments from the trucking industry, affected industries and citizen groups. It
should include the proposed restriction type, location, existing conditions, alternatives,
maintenance and safety considerations on the alternative route(s), any initial public
comment, and conditions that may involve further CEQA compliance.
3. Public Review And Comment Period.
During the public review period the local agency gives public notice of the proposed
truck restriction and public hearings may be advertised and held. All documentation
acquired to date, regarding the proposed truck restriction, should be available for public
review prior to and at the public hearing.
4. Local Agency Receives Comments And Prepares A Final Truck Restriction Report.
The local agency considers all comments received. If the local agency still wants to
proceed with the proposed restriction, a final truck restriction report, including any
comment revisions and the draft restriction ordinance or resolution, is prepared and
forwarded to the Caltrans district office. The District Director forwards the report with
the District's recommendations to the Chief, Traffic Operations Program, at Caltrans
Headquarters.
5. The Traffic Operations Program Submits A Recommendation To The Director's
Office.
The Office of Commercial Vehicle Operations and Permits, Traffic Operations Program,
in cooperation with Caltrans Headquarters Environmental and Legal Programs, will
prepare a recommendation regarding the truck restriction and submit it to the Director's
Office.
6. The Director issues a written approval of the draft truck restriction.
7. The local agency passes the final truck restriction ordinance or resolution.
S. Restriction sio-ns are erected and the restriction is enforced.
0004G'iy
TRUCK RESTRICTION REPORT CHECKLIST
Approval of requests for restrictions will be contingent upon the identification and documentation of any
impacts on highway safety and structural integrity, the environment and operational efficiency. This
checklist is presented as a guideline only. All of the items on this checklist may not be applicable to a
specific proposal.
I. COVER
The cover of the document clearly states the Caltrans District, County, Route and
postmile limits of the proposal. Any proposed local ordinance or resolution number
should also be placed on the cover.
II. PROPOSAL STATEMENT
The proposed restriction and references to specific codes, regulations and any local
ordinances or resolutions are clearly presented in the proposal statement. If exemptions to
general rules apply, cite appropriate statutory law or regulations.
III. JUSTIFICATION FOR THE PROPOSAL
Depends on rationale: safety, noise, hazardous materials, air quality, bridge weight limit,
construction zones, seasonal operation, etc.
Analyses of present and future safety, operational (capacity, geometrics) and/or structural
adequacy supporting the restriction. A description of existing versus proposed conditions.
Supporting data tables, maps and/or photographs.
Analysis of environmental considerations for the restriction proposal with an explanation
of impacts and mitigation measures.
Existing and future planned land uses.
Analysis of the impact on interstate and intrastate commerce. Analysis of the economic
impact on communities, shippers and trucking companies due to increased travel
distances.
Analysis and recommendations of any alternative routes that can safely accommodate any
California legal commercial motor vehicles and serve the area in which such segment is
located.
Evidence of consultation with the local governments in which the segment is located as
well as the Governor or Governor's representatives of any adjacent State that might be
directly affected by such a restriction.
Results of any public hearings.
IV. APPENDICES
Copies of any draft local restriction ordinances or resolutions.
Copies of any supportive correspondence or documents for the restriction.
Minutes of public hearings. (This can be a cassette tape.) t
DU®46t3