HomeMy WebLinkAboutAGENDA REPORT 2000 0105 CC REG ITEM 10GTO:
FROM:
DATE:
CITY OF MOORPARK
AGENDA REPORT
The Honorable City Council
s�fl =3
rMM �•
C EY �!F 710 0RPNRX, CALIVORNU
C'j,,y Councai N ee eFeg
of LlI111
BY:
Kenneth C. Gilbert, Director of Public Works
December 15, 1999 (Council Meeting 1 -5 -2000)
/7 L�-
SUBJECT: Consider Authorization to Prepare and Distribute Mail
Ballots Related to the Levy of Landscape Maintenance
Assessments Upon the Properties Within Zone 12 of
Assessment District 84 -2 - Carlsberg Specific Plan
DISCUSSION
A. Background
Three years ago Zone 12 was established in Assessment District
84 -2, encompassing all of the properties within the Carlsberg
Specific Plan. Since its establishment, the assessment amount
for Zone 12 has remained at zero.
B. Request
The parkway and median landscaping within the Carlsberg
Specific Plan has been installed. The maintenance of those
improvements has been provided by the developers. The
developers have requested that the City activate the Zone 12
assessment and assume the maintenance of certain designated
portions of those improvements.
C. Mail Ballot Required
In order to increase the Zone 12 assessment from zero to any
amount, the City must first receive approval of a Mail Ballot
sent to all affected property owners. Approval of the Ballot
requires an affirmative vote from a majority of the Ballots
received, based upon assessment amount.
Crlsbrg ba11ot5 0 0 0® 5 G
Ballot for Zone 12 Assessment [Carlsberg]
December 15, 1999
Page 2
D. Scope of Improvements to be Maintained by Zone 12 Assessment
The scope of the landscaping to be accepted and maintained by
the City, and funded by the Zone 12 Assessment, is generally
described on the map attached as Exhibit 1. A summary list of
those improvements is as follows:
• the medians on Science Drive;
• certain parkways within the R -O -W described as follows:
- on Science Drive south of the Commercial/ Industrial
frontage;
- on north side of Tierra Rejada Road;
- on the east side of Spring Road south of the
Presbyterian Church;
• certain slopes beyond the R -O -W described as follows:
- on Science Drive south of the Commercial / Industrial
frontage;
- on the north side of Tierra Rejada Road; and
- on the east side of Spring Road south of the
Institutional lots.
E. Landscape Improvements NOT Maintained by the City
Areas not included in the landscaping to be maintained by the
Zone 12 assessment include the following:
Description To Be Maintained By:
1 all parkway and slope landscaping Property owner
along the Science Drive and New Los
Angeles Avenue frontage of the
commercial / industrial properties
2 the Entry Statement landscaping at
all of the streets intersecting
Science Drive, including the entry
statements at Science Drive and
Tierra Rejada Road
3 the Spring Road Median
4 the future Tierra Rejada Road
Median
Carlbrg ballot5
• Commercial /
Industrial Property:
the Property Owner
• Residential: the
Appropriate HOA
City
City
Ballot for Zone 12 Assessment [Carlsberg]
December 15, 1999
Page 3
F. Estimated Annual Maintenance Costs
Attached as Exhibit 2 is a chart summarizing the estimated
annual maintenance costs for the landscape improvements
described above. These estimated costs were developed with
input from the developers and their landscape architect and
the City's Landscape Maintenance Contractor.
G. Benefit Spread Formula
The recommended Benefit Spread Formula merely allocates a
percentage of the cost for various areas to the three land use
categories: Residential, Commercial and Institutional. A
number of Alternative Spread Formulas have been developed
which are discussed below.
H. Prior Year Protest
Approximately one year ago, Mail Ballots for the subject
assessment were distributed to the affected property owners.
The benefit spread formula used to allocate the assessments
identified in those Ballots allocated costs as follows:
Total Assmnt. Per lot [Acre]
• Residential 69% $158,447 $296.72
• Commercial 28% $ 65,623 $890.16
• Institutional 3% $ 5,692 $890.16
$229,962
The owners of the commercial properties objected to the amount
allocated to that land use. The matter was deferred to FY
2000/2001 assessment year.
I. Developers' Input
The developers of all of the properties within Zone 12 have
discussed and agreed to a spread allocation generally as
depicted by Alternate M below and summarized as follows::
Total Assmnt. Per lot [Acre]
• Residential 90.4% $207,800 $389.14
• Commercial 6.0% $ 13,815 $187.39
• Institutional 3.60 $ 8,347 $1,260.85
$229,961
Carlbrg balloO 000058
Ballot for Zone 12 Assessment [Carlsberg]
December 15, 1999
Page 4
J. Alternative Spread Formulas
Attached as Exhibit 3 are a number of charts describing a
number
of Alternative
Cost Allocation
Formulas.
Those
Alternate Formulas are
generally summarized
as follows:
Cost Allocation
Alt.
Commercial Lots
Institutional
Lots.
Residential Lots
M
Science Drive
Science Drive
Median:
25%
Median:
75%
Parkways:
25%
Parkways:
75%
Slopes:
0%
Slopes:
100%
Tierra Rejada
Parkways:
100%
Slopes:
100%
Spring Road
Spring Road
Parkways:
34%
Parkways:
66%
Slopes:
0%
Slopes:
100%
N
Science Drive
Science Drive
Median:
50%
Median:
50%
Parkways:
50%
Parkways:
50%
Slopes:
0%
Slopes:
100%
Tierra Rejada
Parkways:
100%
Slopes:
100%
Spring Road
Spring Road
Parkways:
34%
Parkways:
66%
Slopes:
0%
Slopes:
100%
P
Science Drive
Science Drive
Median:
50%
Median:
50%
Parkways:
50%
Parkways:
50%
Slopes:
50%
Slopes:
50%
Tierra Rejada
Road
Parkways:
100%
Slopes:
100%
Spring Road
Spring Road
Parkways:
34%
Parkways:
66%
Slopes:
0%
Slopes:
100%
Q
Science Drive
Science Drive
Median:
50%
Median:
50%
Parkways:
50%
Parkways:
50%
Slopes:
50%
Slopes:
50%
Tierra Rejada
Road
Tierra Rejada
Parkways:
50%
Parkways:
50%
Slopes:
50%
Slopes:
50%
Spring Road
Spring Road
Spring Road
Parkways:
0%
Parkways:
34%
Parkways:
66%
Slopes:
50%
Slopes:
0%
Slopes:
50%
Carlbrg ballots
Ballot for Zone 12 Assessment [Carlsberg]
December 15, 1999
Page 5
K. Cost Allocation Alternatives
A summary of the total assessments based upon the above
allocation chart is as follows:
$229,961
N Residential 84.4% $ 363.27 $193,985
Commercial 12.0% $ 374.79 $ 27,629
Institutional 3.6% $1,260.85 $ 8,347
$229,961
P Residential 73.5% $ 316.45 $168,984
Commercial 22.9% $ 716.93 $ 52,631
Institutional 3.6% $1,260.85 $ 8,347
$229,961
Q Residential 51.7% $ 222.68 $118,909
Commercial 44.7% $1,393.19 $102,706
Institutional 3.6% $1,260.85 $ 8,347
$229,961
L. Future Adiustment of Assessment Amount
Each ballot will indicate that the City reserves the right to
increase the assessment for subsequent years in an amount not
to exceed the increase in the Consumer Price Index (CPI).
M. Votes
The owner of each affected property receives one vote for each
dollar assessed to that property. Support of the assessment
requires a majority vote from the ballots received.
N. Ballot Results
The ballots will be prepared and distributed within the next
few weeks. It is anticipated that the results will be
presented to the City Council in approximately eight weeks.
Carlbrg ballots 0 0 0 0 tILP,0
Percent
Per Lot
Total
Alt. Land Use
Of Total
or Acre
Assmnt
M Residential
90.4%
$ 389.14
$207,800
Commercial
6.0%
$ 187.39
$ 13,815
Institutional
3.6%
$1,260.85
$ 8,347
$229,961
N Residential 84.4% $ 363.27 $193,985
Commercial 12.0% $ 374.79 $ 27,629
Institutional 3.6% $1,260.85 $ 8,347
$229,961
P Residential 73.5% $ 316.45 $168,984
Commercial 22.9% $ 716.93 $ 52,631
Institutional 3.6% $1,260.85 $ 8,347
$229,961
Q Residential 51.7% $ 222.68 $118,909
Commercial 44.7% $1,393.19 $102,706
Institutional 3.6% $1,260.85 $ 8,347
$229,961
L. Future Adiustment of Assessment Amount
Each ballot will indicate that the City reserves the right to
increase the assessment for subsequent years in an amount not
to exceed the increase in the Consumer Price Index (CPI).
M. Votes
The owner of each affected property receives one vote for each
dollar assessed to that property. Support of the assessment
requires a majority vote from the ballots received.
N. Ballot Results
The ballots will be prepared and distributed within the next
few weeks. It is anticipated that the results will be
presented to the City Council in approximately eight weeks.
Carlbrg ballots 0 0 0 0 tILP,0
Ballot for Zone 12 Assessment [Carlsberg]
December 15, 1999
Page 6
O. Acceptance and Maintenance of Improvements
It is the intent of staff to work with the developers of the
landscape improvements over the next few months on the various
tasks required to be completed prior to the City accepting and
maintaining the subject landscape improvements identified in
Section C above. The prerequisites for such action include,
but may not be limited to, the following:
1. Preparation, approval, acceptance and recordation of
easements for all slope areas to be maintained by the City.
2. Inspection and acceptance of the irrigation and landscape
improvements as being complete and in conformance with the
landscape architectural design plans and specifications and
City's specifications for landscape improvements maintained
by the City;
3. Identification of all water and electrical services for
said improvements, including meter numbers, service
numbers, locations and areas served;
4. Compilation and presentation, in a form acceptable to the
City, all required irrigation controller staging charts and
diagrams;
5. Except as noted in Number 6, completion of all irrigation
systems modifications necessary to separate water and
electrical services supplying City maintained landscaping
from landscaping to be maintained by others;
6. Compilation and processing of all applications and related
paperwork required for the transfer of necessary water and
electrical services to the City;
7. Identification of which, if any, water and electrical
services supplying City maintained landscaping will not be
transferred to the City because separation of City
maintained facilities and non -city maintained facilities is
impractical; and
8. In the event, utilities for certain of the City maintained
landscaping is to be provided by others, determine what, if
any, of the costs for those services will be refunded to
said utility customer by the City's Zone 12 assessment.
It will be the intent of staff to defer acceptance of the
landscape improvements identified in Section D above until all
of the above prerequisites are completed.
Carlbrg ballots 000061
Ballot for Zone 12 Assessment [Carlsberg]
December 15, 1999
Page 7
P. Summary
There are four Alternative Allocation Formulas described in
Section K above. As mentioned in Section I above, the
developers have requested that the Allocation Formula M be
approved.
STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS
Staff recommends that the City Council approve Alternate
Allocation Formula M as described in this report and direct
staff to proceed with the preparation and distribution of Mail
Ballots for the Zone 12 assessment for FY 2000/2001.
Attachments:
Exhibit 1: Maps of Areas to be Maintained
Exhibit 2: Estimated Costs
Exhibit 3: Alternative Cost Allocation Formulas
Carlbrg ballot5 O ®O O G 2
_I
C'x -A-
Z o1�lE �Z
Ok 11
000063
,I I MOORPARK FREEWAY
if
OPEN.SRACE
RESIDENTIAL
COMMERCIAL SITE COMMERCIAL SITE QP ti - - COMMUNITY
LOT LOT
os -1
SITE \ \
) /e„ /� \ .PEN. SP E
RESIDENTIAL \ \/
� l � L r.0!AMUFIITV
IV
� : %,y.q�3n• �'�.c..�/ 1 s_ ''J ,�� '9, �� -' RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITY
J� l 7 EN Sr
•/ COMMERCIAL SITE
LOT 2. - - — -�
O \'
0
N
Z
0
OPEN SPACE'/
MIDDLE SCHOOL
RESIDENTIAL COAIMUNi 'Y
l !
LOT 4
1'
�.,. SPACE ,��•
NOTE: ALL CORNER ENTRY STATEMENTS ARE EXCLUDED
6�
C)
PARKWAYS / INSIDE R.O V
SCIENCE DRIVE MEDIAN
LANDSCAPE EASEMEN
(OUTSIDE R.O.W.)
moonPAINK 'WAV
%A
OPEN
4'". r:lJNIkIrIl(:IA- y;rF. COMPAHiCIAL Sill
LOT I LOT 4 O Os I Qp OS-2
PARK SITE
RFS;DENTIAI.
LOT 2
'.:'0-11'A4K 0,00,E S(;HrOL
A,
y
LOT 3 L
f
{ O
mlPARKWAYS i INSIDE R.O.1
mMEDIANS
LANDSCAPE EASEMENTS
(OUTSIDE R.O.W.)
0
PLANT LEGEND
0
I wwo,*W-
T.
;70
r
BE
I
ME
Ig a.
Ifi
44-
M--
I wwo,*W-
T.
;70
r
BE
I
ME
Ig a.
Ifi
44-
I
Co
ys
i
"7
a
u wi. v.iOR3vOY0`•9
.o, yr nwrC1MMO.ouue
on°O.ui rc.,
I
III I!
I
Si
e
4 j.
U
i
1--.
444
�jj
Mar
�oF 72
19
do ,
v/ �� ^ter ; � :.�� A��►•i, °
+ar.. .�.��/� .�-� vim•:+
+►' �� /4 � �% YAK/ AA'.lA�il / /I /�,I /O / /�.••4' //5r/ • ° +•
NIC
�� •e a: ;; �� p p � a�� � iii/ /iii - ,
ob �a� flit` ....Y: • .� y
i
� t
Q
i�q p /'' Sege �� �: °v • pp�
AW
1►
��, ,`gin �' - � ®' - "° •:�:'e� ..; >�,- �� ��
a as
'+► p �• ••,��
:rapt
v
�a6 �
;i
�q
U � �
Q �
w a
m to
,c F
U.
w
r
Q(
g�I
.M.
LP-3
oc.3b
.a•
WW LOS APIM.ES AVM*
poi 7
n
m
owvE�
rcwa�r
{ T�
�r
��gg v
F N
e
t,.
BERG RANCH V 0 V ®6, 1
1973 a 4974 • Maagvaax, u.
1
' • 's
�� '7a:GUf4,MT�"( "D09fD� vY) !!r.f lM9G
1 ^ —\ -R'! VhIVY�T� A�LI•i :T`J�f, WhW
_ J
OWL
1
,1
b'
31 1 TTAR4 REVIDA ROR(`
A., X-S
I
I J�
-' TiE RRA RFJADA ROAD _ tA-
m
U
F� U
ZW
F
a I<
6 �]
i1fET
LP -5,
]F 82
1-
1'
1,
1` 1,
i1
F �E
eC„ �
s S
i cl
i
4�e
14W
b o
SCIENCE DRIVE Xm
7
//.
m
;e
9
E
000071
PIANiIN� PUN (i IERRA REJADA ROAD) CARLSBERG RANCH (
Q r � �'•>e AEVI90115 TENTATNE TRACTS �9)]619I�•MDORPAFtl(. CA.
N oSfiNE A gyp_ C T FMANCIAL A GFWRE PARTWMW ws Pr9i��
O'E"E �_ p
CREdtEO C� ��- ]1001M $Iw1.9�r$�SM�YMRU bbS
�� QQ
...........
D �
II
•� I
�I
v
- -- erg
i
'� 116 `1
1
�I
SIIa
�lig 3
0000721
wwe�ron
PUNTING PUN )SPRING
ROAD)
CARLSBERG RANCH
r
@CAA[ �•s
11EylypM9
TENTATNE TRACTS 4973 6 4974 • MOORPARK, CA.
4 V
DA �
--
1;!!14_ C
CT.".,CIA4AQV*RALPMRNERSW
CRECK[D_
CMa
A__ 6__
Moo]ln Sivw•Sa. Z13 •Sw " " -taG pqf
1
�I
SIIa
�lig 3
0000721
wwe�ron
R -dl
a�
' s
>DD n
I�
II �s
>DD 4 U
i4
I
F n
o
x y
j m
3 �
i
,l
VIN
I-SQ
C/
O
i
I '
sao
ue+
ON
�S1C�7 l�t(V �y�1� SNI� 9 c
"0iwn o.a no�,un io..0
,rrwv w�i aowwr��arn��wv� � o
C�
��0
Chart'A' (1 of 4)
Carlsberg Specific Plan
Landscape Assessment District
Zone 12 A: Parkways and Medians
Estimated Annual Assessment Calculation
I. Maintenance Cost Calculation
Alternate P
Tierra
Rejada
Road
nla
n/a
n/a
n/a
n1a
n/a
0
0.0250
$0
$0
50
1
1
0
11
19,430
0.0235
$456.61
$5,479.26
$5,479.26
40
1
0
1
20
140,660
0.0270
$3,797.82
$45,573.84
$45,573.84
160,090
$51,053.10
lam: -%A 2
C 4Z)
16- Dec -99
Spring Total
Road II Item Cost
0 l l 100
0'
0'
$0.00
$0.00
160
0
0
0
22
75,700
0.0235
$1,778.95
$21,347.40
$21,347.40
$83.00
1
1
0
26
185,360
0.0270
$5,004.72
$60,056.64
40%
($24,022.66)
$36,033.98
261,060
$57,381.38
I
0
0
2
36
41,625
540
3
3
1
2
103
267,930
334
6
1
5
2
103
506,000
$12,487.50
$62,390.39
$125,088.62
816,658
$199,966.51
+ 15% > $29,994.98
$229,961.49
0000x•4
Science Drive
Description
4973
4974
Total
Median
No. of trees
50
50
100
No. of Elec. Meters
1
1
2
No. of Water Meters
2"
0
0 '
0
1 -1/2"
0
' 0 '
0
No. of Controllers
2
2
No. of Valves
14
22
36
Sq Ft
20,195
21,430
41,625
Unit Cost / Mo. ($)
0.0250
0.0250
Amt. / Mo.
$504.88
$535.75
Amt. / Yr.
$6,058.50
$6,429.00
$12,487.50
Parkway (R -O -W)
No. of trees
110
220
330
No. of Elec. Meters
1
1
2
No. of Water Meters
2"
1
1
2
1 -1/2"
1
0
1
No. of Controllers
2
2
No. of Valves
32
38
70
Sq Ft
62,250
110,550
172,800
Unit Cost / Mo. ($)
0.0235
0.0235
Amt. / Mo.
$1,462.88
$2,597.93
Amt. / Yr.
$17,554.50
$31,175.10
$48,729.60
Less Commercial ( %)
75%
Less Commercial ($)
($13,165.88)
($13,165.88)
Net Total
$4,388.63
$31,175.10
$35,563.73
Parkway (Future Esmnt)
No. of trees
50
161
211
No. of Elec. Meters
2
2
4
No. of Water Meters
2"
0
0
0
1 -1/2"
2
2
4
No. of Controllers
2
2
No. of Valves
38
19
57
Sq Ft
76,300
103,680
179,980
Unit Cost / Mo. ($)
0.0270
0.0270
Amt. / Mo.
$2,060.10
$2,799.36
Amt. / Yr.
$24,721.20
$33,592.32
$50,89716
Less Institutional ( %)
Less Institutional ($)
Less Commercial ( °I °)
30%
Less Commercial ($)
($7,416.36)
($7,416.36)
Net Total
$17,304.84
$33,592.32
$43,480.80
Total SF
394,405
Total Annual Maint.
Cost Estimate
$104,697.90
Alternate P
Tierra
Rejada
Road
nla
n/a
n/a
n/a
n1a
n/a
0
0.0250
$0
$0
50
1
1
0
11
19,430
0.0235
$456.61
$5,479.26
$5,479.26
40
1
0
1
20
140,660
0.0270
$3,797.82
$45,573.84
$45,573.84
160,090
$51,053.10
lam: -%A 2
C 4Z)
16- Dec -99
Spring Total
Road II Item Cost
0 l l 100
0'
0'
$0.00
$0.00
160
0
0
0
22
75,700
0.0235
$1,778.95
$21,347.40
$21,347.40
$83.00
1
1
0
26
185,360
0.0270
$5,004.72
$60,056.64
40%
($24,022.66)
$36,033.98
261,060
$57,381.38
I
0
0
2
36
41,625
540
3
3
1
2
103
267,930
334
6
1
5
2
103
506,000
$12,487.50
$62,390.39
$125,088.62
816,658
$199,966.51
+ 15% > $29,994.98
$229,961.49
0000x•4
%, 2
Chart 'A' (2 of 4) Alternate P
Carlsberg Specific Plan 16- Dec -99
Landscape Assessment District
Zone 12 A: Parkways and Medians
Estimated Annual Assessment Calculation
Il. Criteria & Assumptions Used to Develop per Square Foot Cost Estimate:
00007
Unit Cost Per Square Foot
Per Month ($)
Easement
Parkways
Outside
Cost Category
Medians
w/ R -O -W
R -O -W
Electrical:
0.000417
0.000167
0.000167
Water:
0.003333
0.003333
0.004167
General Maintenance:
0.016667
0.015833
0.018333
Special Maintenance:
0.000750
0.000667
0.000250
Sub -Total
0.0212
0.0200
0.0229
Plus 15% contingency (x1.15)
0.0243
0.0230
0.0264
Per Month Cost. . Say:
0.0250
0.0235
0.0270
Annual Cost Estimate (per s.f.)
$0.30
$0.28
$0.32
00007
Chart A (3 of 4)
Alternate M
Carlsberg Specific Plan
16- Dec -99
Landscape Assessment District
Zone 12A: Parkways & Medians
Estimated Annual Assessment Calculation
III. Cost Distribution
To
To
To
Commercial Lots
Institutional Lots
Residential Lots
Total
Area % of Tot. Cost Nr. $
% of Tot.
Cost Nr. $
% of Totdal Cost Nr. $
% of Tot.
Cost Nr. $
Science Drive
Medians 25%
3,122
0%
-
75%
9,366
100%
12,488
Parkways 25%
8,891
0%
-
75%
26,673
100%
35,564
Easements 0%
-
0%
-
100%
43,481
100%
43,481
Tierra Rejada Road
Medians n/a
-
n/a
-
n/a
-
n/a
-
Parkways 0%
-
0%
-
100%
5,479
100%
5,479
Easements 0%
-
0%
-
100%
45,574
100%
45,574
Spring Raod
Medians n/a
-
n/a
-
n/a
-
n/a
-
Parkways 0%
-
34%
7,258
66%
14,089
0%
21,347
Easements 0%
-
0%
-
100%
36,034
0%
36,034
Sub -Total
12,013
7,258
180,696
199,967
Plus Admin (15 %)
1,802
1,089
27,104
29,995
Total 6.0%
13,815
3.6%
8,347
90.4%
207,800
229,961
IV. Assessment Calcualation
Commercial
Lots
Institutional Lots
Residential Lots
Total
No. of Lots
534
No. of Acres
73.72
6.62
Total Assessment
13,815
8,347
207,800
229,961
Assessment per Lot
389.14
Assessment per Aacre
187.39
1,260.85
0000,743
Chart'A' (4 of 4)
Carlsberg Specific Plan
Landscape Assessment District
Zone 12: Parkway and Medians
Estimated Annual Assessment Calculation
V. Assessment Amount to Each Lot
A. All Residential Propeties per Lot Assessment
X -3 1 z)
Alternate M
Annual
Assmnt Assmnt Percent
Ac. Rate ($) Amt. ($) of Total
B. Commercial Lots
AP Number
Owner
1 512 -0- 260 -095
C T Investors
0.46
1 512 -0- 260 -105
C T Investors
4.51
512 -0- 270 -065
Sub -total
4.97
2 512 -0- 260 -015
Simi - Moorpark
17.83
2 512 -0- 260 -085
Simi - Moorpark
6.66
Sub -total
24.49
3 512 -0- 260 -045
Cypress Land Co.
31.06
3 512 -0- 260 -055
Cypress Land Co.
n/a
3 512 -0- 260 -125
Cypress Land Co.
1.52
Sub -total
32.58
4 512 -0- 260 -025 Simi - Moorpark 11.68
Total Commercial 73.72
C. Institutioanl Lots
AP Number
Owner
9 512 -0- 270 -035
Conejo Freeway Prop
2.78
10 512 -0- 270 -045
Three D
3.84
512 -0- 270 -065
Conejo Freeway Prop
n/a
Total
6.62
Total
389.14 207,799.92 90.4%
187.39 931.35
187.39 4,589.29
187.39
187.39
1,260.85
1,260.85
6,105.31
2,188.77
13,814.73
3,505.17
4,841.67
8,346.83
229,961.49
6.0%
3.6%
00007?
m (3)
Chart A (3 of 4) Alternate N
Carlsberg Specific Plan 16- Dec -99
Landscape Assessment District
Zone 12A. Parkways & Medians
Estimated Annual Assessment Calculation
III. Cost Distribution
IV. Assessment Calcualation
Commercial Lots
No. of Lots
No. of Acres 73.72
Total Assessment 27,629
Assessment per Lot
Assessment per Aacre 374.79
Institutional Lots Residential Lots
534
6.62
8,347 193,985
363.27
1,260.85
Total
229,961
000078
To
To
To
Commercial Lots
Institutional Lots
Residential
Lots
Total
Area
% of Tot.
Cost Nr. $
% of Tot.
Cost Nr. $
% of Totdal Cost Nr. $
% of Tot.
Cost [Yr. $
Science Drive
Medians
50%
6,244
0%
-
50%
6,244
100%
12,488
Parkways
50%
17,782
0%
-
50%
17,782
100%
35,564
Easements
0%
-
0%
-
100%
43,481
100%
43,481
Tierra Rejada Road
Medians
n/a
-
n/a
-
n/a
-
n/a
-
Parkways
0%
-
0%
-
100%
5,479
100%
5,479
Easements
0%
-
0%
-
100%
45,574
100%
45,574
Spring Raod
Medians
n/a
-
n/a
-
n/a
-
n/a
-
Parkways
0%
-
34%
7,258
66%
14,089
0%
21,347
Easements
0%
-
0%
-
100%
36,034
0%
36,034
Sub -Total
24,026
7,258
168,683
199,967
Plus Admin (15 %)
3,604
1,089
25,302
29,995
Total
12.0%
27,629
3.6%
8,347
84.4%
193,985
229,961
IV. Assessment Calcualation
Commercial Lots
No. of Lots
No. of Acres 73.72
Total Assessment 27,629
Assessment per Lot
Assessment per Aacre 374.79
Institutional Lots Residential Lots
534
6.62
8,347 193,985
363.27
1,260.85
Total
229,961
000078
Chart 'A' (4 of 4)
Carlsberg Specific Plan
Landscape Assessment District
Zone 12: Parkway and Medians
Estimated Annual Assessment Calculation
)(_3 4)
Alternate N
Annual
Assmnt Assmnt Percent
Ac. Rate ($) Amt. ($) of Total
V. Assessment Amount to Each Lot
A. All Residential Propeties per Lot Assessment 363.27 193,985.20
B. Commercial Lots
AP Number
Owner
1 512 -0- 260 -095
C T Investors
0.46
1 512 -0- 260 -105
C T Investors
4.51
Sub -total
4.97
374.79
1,862.70
2 512 -0- 260 -015
Simi- Moorpark
17.83
2 512 -0- 260 -085
Simi - Moorpark
6.66
Sub -total
24.49
374.79
9,178.59
3 512 -0- 260 -045
Cypress Land Co.
31.06
3 512 -0- 260 -055
Cypress Land Co.
n/a
3 512 -0- 260 -125
Cypress Land Co.
1.52
Sub -total
32.58
374.79
12,210.63
4 512 -0- 260 -025
Simi - Moorpark
11.68
374.79
4,377.54
Total Commercial
73.72
27,629.45
C. Institutioanl Lots
AP Number
Owner
9 512 -0- 270 -035
Conejo Freeway Prop
2.78
1,260.85
3,505.17
10 512 -0- 270 -045
Three D
3.84
1,260.85
4,841.67
512 -0- 270 -065
Conejo Freeway Prop
n/a
Total
6.62
8,346.83
Total
229,961.49
84.4%
12.0%
3.6%
000079
X- 3 (s)
Chart A (3 of 4)
Alternate P
Carlsberg Specific Plan
16- Dec -99
Landscape Assessment District
Zone 12A: Parkways & Medians
Estimated Annual Assessment Calculation
III. Cost Distribution
To
To
To
Commercial
Lots
Institutional Lots
Residential
Lots
Total
Area % of Tot. Cost Nr. $
% of Tot.
Cost /Yr. $
% of Totbal Cost /Yr. $
% of Tot.
Cost /Yr. $
Science Drive
Medians 50%
6,244
0%
-
50%
6,244
100%
12,488
Parkways 50%
17,782
0%
-
50%
17,782
100%
35,564
Easements 50%
21,740
0%
-
50%
21,740
100%
43,481
Tierra Rejada Road
Medians n/a
-
n/a
-
n/a
-
n/a
-
Parkways 0%
-
0%
-
100%
5,479
100%
5,479
Easements 0%
-
0%
-
100%
45,574
100%
45,574
Spring Raod
Medians n/a
-
n/a
-
n/a
-
n/a
-
Parkways 0%
-
34%
7,258
66%
14,089
0%
21,347
Easements 0%
-
0%
-
100%
36,034
0%
36,034
Sub -Total
45,766
7,258
146,942
199,967
Plus Admin (15 %)
6,865
1,089
22,041
29,995
Total 22.9%
52,631
3.6%
8,347
73.5%
168,984
229,961
IV. Assessment Calcualation
Commercial Lots
No. of Lots
No. of Acres 73.72
Total Assessment 52,631
Assessment per Lot
Assessment per Aacre 713.93
Institutional Lots Residential Lots
534
6.62
8,347 168,984
316.45
1,260.85
Total
229,961
000080
Chart'A' (4 of 4)
Carlsberg Specific Plan
Landscape Assessment District
Zone 12: Parkway and Medians
Estimated Annual Assessment Calculation
V. Assessment Amount to Each Lot
A. All Residential Propeties per Lot Assessment
Y— 3 ( c, )
Alternate P
Annual
Assmnt Assmnt Percent
Ac. Rate ($) Amt. ($) of Total
B. Commercial Lots
AP Number
Owner
1 512 -0- 260 -095
C T Investors
0.46
1 512 -0- 260 -105
C T Investors
4.51
512 -0- 270 -065
Sub -total
4.97
2 512 -0- 260 -015
Simi - Moorpark
17.83
2 512 -0- 260 -085
Simi - Moorpark
6.66
Sub -total
24.49
3 512 -0- 260 -045
Cypress Land Co.
31.06
3 512 -0- 260 -055
Cypress Land Co.
n/a
3 512 -0- 260 -125
Cypress Land Co.
1.52
Sub -total
32.58
4 512 -0- 260 -025 Simi - Moorpark 11.68
Total Commercial 73.72
C. Institutioanl Lots
AP Number
Owner
9 512 -0- 270 -035
Conejo Freeway Prop
2.78
10 512 -0- 270 -045
Three D
3.84
512 -0- 270 -065
Conejo Freeway Prop
n/a
Total
6.62
Total
316.45 168,983.74 73.5%
713.93 3,548.23
713.93 17,484.14
713.93 23,259.84
713.93 8,338.70
52,630.91
1,260.85 3,505.17
1,260.85 4,841.67
8,346.83
229,961.49
22.9%
3.6%
00004s:i
X-3 C->>
Chart A (3 of 4)
Alternate Q
Carlsberg Specific Plan
16- Dec -99
Landscape Assessment District
Zone 12A: Parkways & Medians
Estimated Annual Assessment Calculation
III. Cost Distribution
To
To
To
Commercial
Lots
Institutional Lots
Residential
Lots
Total
Area % of Tot. Cost Nr. $
% of Tot.
Cost Nr. $
% of Totdal Cost Nr. $
% of Tot.
Cost [Yr. S
Science Drive
Medians 50%
6,244
0%
-
50%
6,244
100%
12,488
Parkways 50%
17,782
0%
-
50%
17,782
100%
35,564
Easements 50%
21,740
0%
-
50%
21,740
100%
43,481
Tierra Rejada Road
Medians n/a
-
n/a
-
n/a
-
n/a
-
Parkways 50%
2,740
0%
-
50%
2,740
100%
5,479
Easements 50%
22,787
0%
-
50%
22,787
100%
45,574
Spring Raod
Medians n/a
-
n/a
-
n/a
-
n/a
-
Parkways 0%
-
34%
7,258
66%
14,089
0%
21,347
Easements 50%
18,017
0%
-
50%
18,017
0%
36,034
Sub -Total
89,310
7,258
103,399
199,967
Plus Admin (15 %)
13,396
1,089
15,510
29,995
Total 44.7%
102,706
3.6%
8,347
51.7%
118,909
229,961
IV. Assessment Calcualation
Commercial
Lots
Institutional Lots
Residential
Lots
Total
No. of Lots
534
No. of Acres
73.72
6.62
Total Assessment
102,706
8,347
118,909
229,961
Assessment per Lot
222.68
Assessment per Aacre
1,393.19
1,260.85
00008-x,
Chart'A' (4 of 4)
Carlsberg Specific Plan
Landscape Assessment District
Zone 12: Parkway and Medians
Estimated Annual Assessment Calculation
V. Assessment Amount to Each Lot
A. All Residential Propeties per Lot Assessment
X_ D N
Alternate Q
Annual
Assmnt Assmnt Percent
Ac. Rate ($) Amt. ($) of Total
222.68 118,908.66 51.7%
B. Commercial Lots
AP Number
Owner
1 512 -0- 260 -095
C T Investors
0.46
1 512 -0- 260 -105
C T Investors
4.51
Sub -total
4.97
1,393.19
6,924.16
2 512 -0- 260 -015
Simi- Moorpark
17.83
2 512 -0- 260 -085
Simi - Moorpark
6.66
Sub -total
24.49
1,393.19
34,119.23
3 512 -0- 260 -045
Cypress Land Co.
31.06
3 512 -0- 260 -055
Cypress Land Co.
n/a
3 512 -0- 260 -125
Cypress Land Co.
1.52
Sub -total
32.58
1,393.19
45,390.14
4 512 -0- 260 -025
Simi - Moorpark
11.68
1,393.19
16,272.46
Total Commercial
73.72
102,705.99
C. Institutioanl Lots
AP Number
Owner
9 512 -0- 270 -035
Conejo Freeway Prop
2.78
1,260.85
3,505.17
10 512 -0- 270 -045
Three D
3.84
1,260.85
4,841.67
512 -0- 270 -065
Conejo Freeway Prop
n/a
Total
6.62
8,346.83
Total 229,961.49
44.7%
3.6%
0000