Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAG RPTS 1986 0806 PR REG al Q O 0 O a 0 PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION AGENDA August 6, 1986 1. CALL TO ORDER 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 3. ROLL CALL 4. APPROVAL OF MINUTES June 18, 1985 and July 16, 1986 5. COMMENTS FROM THE PUBLIC 6. BUSINESS ITEMS A. Continued Use Application - Highway 118 Committee B. Continued Use Application - Moorpark Rotary Club C. Park Requirements for PD 1014 G.H. Palmer Associates Review and consideration of the developer's park proposal per the City's park dedication requirements. D. Park Amenities for North Meadows Park Review of the play equipment and other amenities for North Meadows Park. E. Peach Hill Park Monument Sign Consideration of design of Monument sign for Peach Hill Park F. Community Center Monument Sign Consideration of Monument Sign for the Community Center G. Community Center Tot Lot Reconsideration of Community Center Tot Lot location Agenda Page 2 H. Additional Trees for City Parks Consideration of additional trees to be selected for various City Parks I. Fall 86 Recreation Service Guide Review of bids for production of Fall Recreation Service Guide J. Parks Work Program Review and consideration of contract proposals for construction projects of the 1986/87 Parks Work Program. 7. STAFF UPDATE & COMMENTS. A. Dance Report B. Moorpark College Application C. Quimby Fee D. NRPA Conference & Commission Program 8. COMMISSION COMMENTS 9. CONSENT CALENDAR Minutes of June 4, 1986 10. ADJOURNMENT I/ /• MOOKYAKK. { JAMES D. WEAK STEVEN KUENY Mayor .� City Manager THOMAS C. FERGUSON ��/`�' CHERYL J. KANE Mayor Pro Tern City Attorney ALBERT PRIETO wet>� RICHARD MORTON CouncilmemberDirector of DANNY A.WOOLARD % Community Councilmember Development LETA YANCY-SUTTON R. DENNIS DELZEIT Councilmember City Engineer DORIS D. BANKUS JOHN V. GILLESPIE City Clerk MEMORANDUM Chief of Police THOMAS P. GENOVESE City Treasurer MC) : Parks and Recreation Commission F R O M : Thomas P. Genovese, Administrative Assistant, qdrIV DAT E : August 1, 1986 U B J E C T : PD 1014 (Palmer) BACKGROUND: As proposed PD 1014 consists of 260 apartments, 26 duplexes, and one single family dwelling for a total of 287 dwelling units. The developer is requesting a density bonus of 25 percent in excess of the density allowed on the site under the city's land use designation and zoning. The site plan for project also shows a dedicated public park site of approximately .5 acre adjacent and to the west of the Chaparral Middle School playfield (Attachment "A") . No improvements to the park site have been proposed to date by the developer. PARK DEDICATION AND IMPROVEMENT REQUIREMENTS Under the city's Parkland Dedication Ordinance, the population generated by the proposed project would result in a need for 2.88 acres of public parkland, or the equivalent in—lieu fees (Under the city's Parkland Dedication Ordinance, the duplex units would be treated as multiple—family units for calculating the parkland dedication requirement; however, the number of persons residing in the proposed duplexes would be comparable to that of a single family detached unit. As a result, it is likely the project would generate more residents, and therefore a greater demand for public parkland than provided under the ordinanace) . The applicant is proposing to dedicate only .5 acre of parkland and must therefore reserve a larger portion of his property for parkland or contribute the difference in in—lieu fees. The Moorpark Parks and Recreation Master Plan (pp 8,9) notes that no park facilities are presently available in the downtown area south of High Street, and that the city should explore all possibilities of acquiring parkland in the area. The Plan states that based on the existing population of Zone 2 (the neighborhood in which the project site is located, generally bounded by High Street to the north, Los Angeles Avenue to the south, Shasta Avenue 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark,California 93021 (805)529-6864 to the west and the Arroyo Simi to the east) , a current need exists for 14.4 acres of parkland, with an anticipated future need of 19.4 acres at full buildout. Towards meeting this need, the City Council directed that an investigation be made of potential locations for a downtown park site, including the project site. This area was selected as the number one priority over a downtown area park. The proposed .5 acre park site is too small to meet the city's needs for a neighborhood park in the downtown area, and also does not meet the project's dedication requirements under the city's parkland ordinance. The park site is not of sufficient size to permit the development of public recreational facilities typical of a neighborhood park on the property (such as a soccer or softball field, basketball court and tot lot) . Further, public access to the site would be provided only from either the school property or through the proposed apartment complex. This access is not acceptable. A larger public park site should be dedicated within the project to meet the city's parkland dedication requirements and the identified need for a park site within the downtown area. While provision of in-lieu fees by the developer would satisfy the parkland ordinance, a needed park site would not be provided, as identified by the City Parks and Recreation Master Plan. As mentioned previously, the proposed project is a residential planned develop- ment. Under city standards, the proposal is required to provide public or private recreational facilities in addition to meeting the public parkland dedication or in-lieu fee requirements. The purpose of the requirement is to compensate for the higher density and minimal private yard space provided for the proposed units. The city could require the applicant to construct recreational facilities, such as a basketball half-court, tot lot, tennis court, playground equipment, and picnic tables, in addition to landscaping, on the park site to satisfy the recreational standards for residential planned developments. PRIVATE RECREATIONAL FACILITIES As show on Attachment "A", the applicant proposes to provide private recreational facilities consisting of two pools, two barbeque areas, three tot lots, and an active play area for the use of the apartment residents. No private recreational facilities are provided within the portion of the project designated for duplex units. PD1010 with 370 units provided four (4) tot lots, two (2) BBQ picnic areas, one (1) relatively large open area for active play with approximately 1200 sq.ft. , four (4) 20' x 40" pools with spas, one (1) lighted tennis court and one (1) lighted multi-use court. Dedication and improvement of a public park site adjacent to the project might allow the developer to eliminate the active play area within the apartment complex. In turn, a larger and more active play area could be provided on the public park site. The public park site, with appropriate improvements, would also serve the duplex units. RECOMMENDATION 1. Recommend to the Planning Commission and the City Council that the developer be required to dedicate an approximate 2.5 acre public park site, (actual size is dependent on the number of units ultimately included in an approved project) located in the northerly portion of the property east of Gisler Avenue (in an L-shape as depicted on Attachment B) . Dedication of a park site of this size will be more consistent than a .5 acre site with the city's park dedication requirements, and identified need for a park in the downtown area. A neighborhood park of this size is substantially smaller than the 6 acres usually required by your Commission. However, this size complies with the minimum size requirement for a neighborhood park, as provided in the Master Plan and would 1) permit potential future acquisition of the adjacent area to enlarge the park; and 2) provide access from both Poindexter and Gisler Avenue as well as being contiguous with Chaparral School. This 2.5 acres will still permit the construction of certain recreational facilities such as a basketball or tennis court. It should be noted that dedication of a park site of this acreage will result in a reduction of the number of units that can be provided on the remaining portion of the property. 2. Consideration of developer's obligation for private recreational facilities. Due to the separation of the project by Gisler Avenue and the use of duplex style on the west side of the street we are really looking at two potential applications of this requirement. A. The apartment project with the typical amenities required in similar projects. A variation of this requirement would be to place some of the otherwise required amenities in the adjacent public park rather than on the project site. This could serve to enhance the open space area on the project site without loss of the normal private recreation facilities to the project residents. B. The duplex project which in many ways is more similar to a single family project because of the yard areas, though relatively small, provided in each dwelling unit. For the provision of private recreation facilities the Commission could consider the payment of a fee as was done in Tracts 4037, 3525 and 4019. In those projects,Carlsberg (now Cal Prop) and Warmington paid $700.00 per dwelling unit plus the provision of the land and minimal passive recreation amenities. The land and improvement costs plus the fee made the contribution for private recreation facilities on those projects worth in excess of $1200.00 per dwelling unit. The funds could then be used to construct recreation facilities in the public park. 3. If the Commission recommends dedication of an approximate 2.5 acre park site, it will also be necessary for the Commission to review a revised site plan to consider open space areas, placement of desired private recreation facilities and related concerns. .. 1U 11.1 4 - _ — „1.1 � T .� • F. i, 1 . Ili �r .. /'1 /�) .N N / ,/\ -. � 14 11 11 I It ' 1. 111 ; to t1 • /t 1/j 14 Si I N I AT ,I III J -_ _` -L_ • .--:--, _ -- �-- O JP 1(11I 1 0.1-•- o-: * : -- -•__--��-�,• _ ~- -. ,1 „__ -r— ,„&- 7.r> -ter 4J_[:1 t ::• /...ti-i II UV' • • .---..\=,,,,i•-•„.s..... Igo .\11,i ,.. .j oo.r_t_11"6 --'r.7..... it ai > * .ifi, V .1 0 .IIII IP _14. . Z h O t1 1,11T/Tt 0.1111 W I w i . c Ti -TT �(��7•; .1111 IN 2 la' , . , . ..... 1•11.40 m y I •ra m Ir :Al O 1 -�1 --� ca m > IN a1 i in. ii '• •-n� cs\c-,,-T-_,‹-,r_-,,_ A l S ori H '0 tom = �a.aoot _. i Tot for f� ' o' • 1Tc • .[fnt rur } ,�- �. t '. �� ` J: � I s -k �r wr j MI _ 1�!';y.t, •• ', •� //�' .OT.r1tT Z H J ® ) :, '�...1. G Or T1114 onitto• O _ al' �.* •,_ `� TOT LOT \ 3:, \ 7'6- fr-J, ,...., . ....., 1. R1TAT1 011111 - :: '-, ` ::...:1-tl;Ri;::=Li —I 'i ,_,\Er.„. ...ec.... .....t, il INCONSVA.NotiNit• 1:i Ji - : I 0 v.-, . (N. 1.. • . .-..•.. t . -� Ni 4' L PAR k_ 51TE_ MOORPARK MEADOWS SITE PLAN BUILDING SUMMARY PROJECT SUMMARY MAP '- = 40 Buildings 768 Parking Stalls •. _ ► .. .1.7.71.77:77-1----- �... i 1.•r1u Aurr/ST l_ •. 1 1 L It 1/TO1r DV►ltt 161 0 pll/1u 1=- •. - •-- =' 0 1 1/f OAT 11NOLt fft 0.1116 1.11/1.1 r•1` 11 e_ y �;L --. ... - 11"'7 1ST e•u1.c...n1 U...I I IOeSyaIT�IJ• 1 UNIT w FT. OAS 287 Units ... TOT..a..11.111 Partners: t 011 1 U II Donut, �POA I amosNommukoonoworm o.•.1.: - I 110 1 61 01.OLt •1 O...n.r.11 n ,❑ "i - 0 066 1 u 100 TOTAL L,0.111 Nur.r�w�. .6 i.. III S• C F-1 . \ l 1 ..,.. :_._t oil- ,'. . BIS" -Th 0.4 I. — - = ' c.-- `�' " �� � � , •_ — �F./� \ /r r . te 1".••C.. ' ''-•ry' • L•.-.., \._,....- . /--' _- ) , .... .. .•._‘( . , c--, • ; •Ir 0"Aarr ArirViid D I • S 11 i OP rfr PORI:1H' ,1.1! Z \. ` 0 \ Y= 1 �/- �.. .. ��,iL Yom► •� '� n 111,•1•111111,2 ilk,", -44r \ I 'Ai ii-waV- t ...-e ir A -3,-.1;-. rrdilrOlArt-',..d.ar.4111111°- n 11101. �� / *girl . Tr �� H p �E. ,_ 1iiUt \ , y `, `j5: H m > ' © i t�1 r {_ "` Q m .1r e.....uf z H �7 Toi Lot t. •y V . L.;t_ f ..•sou. ' /1. ( 0• �n� 6 - POOL •,nvf ruT r IV.7 . �I 1 ( S .}^1, yt • I f-• l� 7 • rn i �'4 .. '..��, Pilo, �> r-1 1 V. .. (-` _ Z , JJ.. . 41; / •OT•r.•T Z 1 L4,,. riol © s, m • ® l; ill � -y --q�j • ',�'��; a. OF Tall DITISIO• TT CD la ' t /..v .. : ._ .. . ,(71: . . c.....,)., , ,,,,,,,,,.....t., �) ^1 S Tel LM ` ,y L t 4000, A 1 - ,41r : _ ,kiN n •u .1,euv. � . • � J l 1� V ; _:• a ::.is•i:i::a::r.....�14FR....;;... Ir . � -•t:: i::• :111iENiKiiK R .1'' L PA.Rk.. SITE. MOORPARK MEADOWS SITE PLAN BUILDING SUMMARY PROJECT SUMMARY MAP • =..tit _ --- --- —- t ::� I i c1• .rc I 40 Buildings 1'R Parking Stella =J t---. * _ � n •flora a-rtn i• 'LIZ wrrul L—. •rJ�•+ ■ 1—..—L P ,. ,511111!ourLn ••• n......nu u.. Seta�� w • _ _ r 11 a I e , ,.Te.•.1.111.1 1•• e....IU:..•. •-1l .iti• ny •, 11.,,i.,......:•.•., :r :Mame;- unT •s rT u. 287 Unita ••• •M•1.:.vo.nl ,� : I .... p,, � r • .11 -. , u ••. j 1.... :�Partners-r • rfGf s' — p01.5151 10 •` 7:o, NIUUKYAKK Jteri,r, 7- 6 JAMES D. WEAK STEVEN KUENY Mayor2. City Manager THOMAS C. FERGUSON /`� CHERYL J. KANE Mayor Pro Tern f� City Attorney ALBERT PRIETO �40% AS- RICHARD MORTON Councilmember IfaVIOWDirector of DANNY A. WOOLARD % Community Councilmember .1 Development LETA YANCY-SUTTON R. DENNIS DELZEIT Councilmember City Engineer DORIS D. BANKUS JOHN V. GILLESPIE City Clerk MEMORANDUM Chief of Police THOMAS P. GENOVESE City Treasurer T O Parks & Recreation Commission F R OM Thomas P. Genovese, Administrative Assistant ,0L/ DATE : August 1, 1986 /�� S U E J E C T : Facilities Request At the last regularly scheduled Parks and Recreation Commission meeting City staff was requested to provide a written report regarding an inquiry from Moorpark College for use of the facilities on a continued basis. Summarized below is the request of the college. Staff was contacted by a Moorpark Community College representative, Dolores McLaughlin, in regards to rental for a class they were wishing to conduct. The request was for a Yogi class to be conducted from 6 p.m. to 8 p.m. on a week night undetermined at this time. The class was to take place on a weekly basis for the semester term. The response of the Facilities Coordinator was that if the facilities were desired on a continue basis (weekly meetings) that a letter specifing dates, and times of requested use of facilities should be sent to the Commission. At this time the Facilities Coordinator did request a letter specifing the information needed above. Also the Facilities Coordinator stated that if the College wished to utilize the multi- purpose room on a Monday, Tuesday, Wednesday or Thursday single use basis, and desired reservations more than two months in advance, that review by the Administrative Assistant would be required. 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark,California 93021 (805)529-6864