Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
AGENDA REPORT 2000 0405 CC REG ITEM 10B
ITEM /0 • 36=� CnT OF MOOR.PARK, CALWORMA, city co-and] Nleeti ACTION: CITY OF MOORPARK �ory — i l AGENDA REPORT TO: The Honorable City Council FROM: Kenneth C. Gilbert, Director of Public Works 7jj---- DATE: March 24, 2000 (Meeting of 4 -5 -00) SUBJECT: Consider Resolution No. 2000- Approving the Engineer's Report for Assessment District AD84 -2 for FY 2000/2001, Declaring Intention to Make Certain Changes to and Ordering the Annual Assessments for Said Assessment District, and Scheduling a Public Hearing to Consider Said Assessments EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This presents for approval a Resolution approving the Engineer's Report for Assessment District AD84 -2 and setting the date for a Public Hearing to consider the levy of assessments for AD 84 -2 for FY 2000 /2001. BACKGROUND A. General Information Assessment District 84 -2 was formed in 1984 pursuant to the provisions of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972." This assessment district was established to allow for the funding of street lighting and parkway /median landscape maintenance and improvement expenses through the levying of assessments as provided for in the act. The City must annually act to levy the lighting and landscape maintenance assessments. Said assessments have been levied each year since the formation of the district. As set forth in the Engineer's Report, there are two types of assessments, generally described as follows: • Citywide Assessments: assessments applied to all of the' lots in the City; and • Zone Assessments: assessments applied to properties within certain zones of benefit to fund maintenance and /or improvements which benefit those properties. 00003 ad84- 01.rpt AD84 -2 Engineer's Report March 24, 2000 Page 2 B. Citvwide Assessments There are two types of expenses funded by two distinct Citywide assessments: street lighting costs and certain parkway and median landscape maintenance costs. 1. Street lighting costs are distributed to all of the properties within the City by means of a formula designed to spread said costs on the basis of benefit. The benefit spread formula identifies a number of factors (including lighting intensity, lighting security, people use, etc.) which are associated with benefits derived, and then weighs those factors by land use as a means to determining benefits derived. 2. Citywide landscape maintenance costs are spread via a People Use formula in which twenty -five percent (25 %) of the total Citywide landscape maintenance costs is allocated to non - residential properties and the remaining seventy -five percent (75 %) is allocated and spread to residential properties. These allocated costs are spread to both non - residential and residential properties by a "people -use" benefit formula based on the land use of each parcel being assessed. C. Zone Assessments Landscape maintenance costs for each Zone of Benefit are spread to each lot within that Zone. Storm debris basin maintenance cost for certain Zones of Benefit, are spread evenly to selected lots within those Zones, deemed to derive benefit from such maintenance. In addition to these maintenance costs, certain Zones may receive an improvement assessment to fund approved improvements to be funded by the assessment for those zones. Except for Zones 7 and 9, the total assessment for each zone is distributed equally between the non - exempt parcels within each zone. The total assessment for the industrial areas covered by Zones 7 and 9, is spread to each non - exempt parcel via a per acre assessment. DISCUSSION A. Resolution of Intent On January 5, 2000, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2000 -1688 initiating the proceedings required to consider the levy of assessments for AD 84 -2 for FY 2000/2001. On that date the City Council also selected Charles Abbott & Associates to prepare the Engineer's Report for the district. ad84- 01.rpt 000004 AD84 -2 Engineer's Report March 24, 2000 Page 3 B. Engineer's Report The draft Engineer's Report is attached as Exhibit 1. This report sets forth the proposed assessment amounts for FY 2000/2001. The report also provides a description and explanation of the Benefit Assessment Formula used to spread the total assessment amounts to all of the lots in the City. C. Boundary Maps The Engineer's Report also includes the "Boundary Map, City of Moorpark Lighting and Landscaping Maintenance Assessment District No. AD84 -2." These boundary maps show the boundaries of Assessment District AD84 -2, and also the boundaries of each Zone of Benefit. These boundary maps, along with the Ventura County Assessor Maps pertaining to properties within the City of Moorpark, constitute the AD84 -2 Assessment District Boundary Maps. Said maps are on file with the City Clerk as required by Sections 22508, 22570 and 22574 of the Streets and Highways Code (Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972). D. Zone 12: Carlsberg Specific Plan The City Council has approved in concept the City's acceptance and future maintenance of certain landscaping within the Carlsberg Specific Plan (Zone 12). That future action is contingent upon the approval of an increase in the Zone 12 assessment from the current amount of zero, to an amount deemed sufficient to fund City costs for the future maintenance of those improvements. Pursuant to Proposition 218, the proposed increase to the Zone 12 assessment may only be approved if the City receives a majority affirmative vote from the mail ballots received from the owners of the properties to be assessed. , On March 1, 2000, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2000 -1711 setting May 3, 2000, as the date of a public hearing to consider the proposed increase to the Zone 12 assessment. On May 3 all of the mail ballots received will be tabulated and the results provided to the City Council. Each property owner receives one vote, for each dollar assessed upon his /her property. If the majority vote from the ballots received is in favor of the proposed increase, the City Council will be asked to confirm the Zone 12 assessments set forth in the attached Engineer's Report (Exhibit 1) . If the majority vote from the ballots received is opposed, the proposed assessment increase to the Zone 12 assessment will have to be abandoned and the Engineer's Report revised to reflect that action. In such case, the maintenance of the landscaping in question will have to be assumed by the Homeowners' Association in the area. 000005 ad84- 01.rpt AD84 -2 Engineer's Report March 24, 2000 Page 4 E. All Other Assessments Unchanged Except for the proposed increase to the Zone 12 assessment, the Engineer's Report proposes no new or increased assessments for AD 84 -2 for FY 2000/2001. Any such new or increased assessment would require approval, via mail ballot, similar to the process being followed with regard to the Zone 12 assessment. F. Zone 13: Campesina Park Last year, with the approval of the Parks Assessment District, the Zone 13 assessment was abandoned. There was no Zone 13 assessment in FY 1999/2000 and there is no Zone 13 assessment proposed for FY 2000/2001 or any future year. G. Summary of Proposed Assessments The following is a summary of the proposed assessments for FY 2000/2001: ad84 -01 . rpt 000006 Total ;Without Basin Maint With Basin Maint. ;Description ___._._._...._ Assmnt ($) ......................_._._..._..:_............:---...... Number: ....--- .............__........- Amount; Number; Amount ($) Citywide Street 204,757.00; 20.85; Lighting....---._ .......... _._-- ..............._._ ... _. ....... ......._ - - -- - Citywide Landscaping _.___...._.........._ 148, 525_..._ 0. 0_ ...... ..............._. ..................._._...................._.............__............._.._.............._..._................_._.__._..................... 13.18 ............_.........._._....- - - - -- ._ . ................ ..._- ................. ._.................. _Sub_ - ...._..Total _'......._ 3. 53.,._ 2.8 2._;_ 0. 0... _ ........................_._._. ............ ..._._... _._.........._. 3. 4...:_ 0. 3...._. ............. _ ...................... - ...................................... ...... - .- - - - - -= Zones -_ .......................-_............._._.__....._.......__._.... .............--- ............... ................. _._........ - -. - -- ._ .... _._ ....... ;...................... ._.... .......... _._._.__......... ....__..........._..........___ ... ...... . . ...... - ._....... -- ... - --- 1_ Tract 2852 -- ._._......._....... ._._._._ ..................._9..x....7.0 __.. ?. 5........... ..........._...._......._._.__7 5 ................__._............. 129.37 _...............--- ...........- i ---------- . - ........... ........... .._73..,__8.84__._1.6......:... ................._...._._.__574 .................---.............---.............---.........._.__...._.. 116.47 48 145.64 ..--- .................._. - -. -;- ._........ ...................._.......... - - - -- ._._..._ 3. .......__._._Tract.......3�.3.2 ___ ._......._ .................. . 079 .:._3.0................._.... - -- ._2.6.5...._:- .__...._.........._._11..:_62._ ........... - ._ ................ _._..... 4: Tract 3274 6,382.92: 129 49.48: _.......... _.......... -_. M_............................ - ............. - ._.......... - ....... ........._.__.................. ---......_.............._................_._._....__...._._..................................... 5: Tracts 3019 3 025 23,.840.,0,0: ............................_._..._._............._.......__._..............._.__.............---....... ....... ...._.....................:-._..._.........._._.__._......._.__.........._...._._......._.__._................_._.__. .142 107.56 ......- _............___........ ........................_._.... 75 114.22 : - ...._ ..................... ..,............._................................. __......_6._..._.__._._ Tract..... 33. 0. 6_.__...._ ................_.--_........ ........................_._.__. _.924...:._0.0..._.._._.... - - -- --._....._ 22._.___............._._.__._ 4. 2_:. 0....__........-----............-_--._................._...._._...._.......... Gabbe rt_._._.__..._ 90...... 0. 4..... 5_.._........---...............---..........._........_......._._-._..._._... ..........................._... ._......_7_..- --- ._L.__?1__@ ................. ._._.__ll..__1.9.9...- 8: Buffer [. CitY ............._..---._........................_._._ ._6.3..._ ._._.__ ?_ r_ 5__ 6. _A_._................__1.23_._1 492: ..... 15.40 ...._...._..................... .Buffer Home Acres ............. ...... _. ........._._..._............._.__._............_._.__._........... ........_.._._................ ..:._0.0......._._._._._._.___. _?_ 5. 76...:._0.0..._......_.______.. _.__; ............. ._._.._2.0.1..._ - ._....... __...,.....----......_....----............:.._._._...._............ 3.7:.69 _._- ._._._._................... r Drive.................._._ . 34.9.8.3_._._._._._49__2.1 ............._. --- A_ ...... ... _..... 27.43 ....... ............ ._. - -- - - -- .............. 10.: Mt Meadows -._ 5.....- P.--- ._._._...._ ............._2.0 Z_,_ 91.8...:._ 6. 0..._........_.__._ __1_,...7_?_9-- ....._.......... - _ _._.._..... _._.......... -5 69 ......_.._............. _._._._._._.__8.?...._3.9...... !._............ ._......_Comm.........__ Property------ ... ............. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . ...._. 11 .._8.1....._A_._._....... _._ .... ... .7....6.55 615_._7? _ll._:... -- - Tract 4174-- ......._.... - -- ............ 3, 040.02 ...... _. _._. ... _ 9 _._._ ._._._ ................... ............._._.__.......... _ .. _ ..... __..- 337.78 ........ -- ................ -......... ....... _.......... _....-...._ .... _ .... _ ...................... 12: Residential 207, 79.7.12: - ** 538 - ....... -- 386.24 - . ......... .-- ........... . - ........ .................. _ .... _._ ............. _ - _._._.......... - Comm ..:.......... %_._._ Indust._..._. ___........................_13, ......... 814...:..7.9......;. -_ ......................_._._...............--_......._...__..........----.............._-.............-----..._................._..................... 98.79 A 139.84 ........................_...._: __ . ...................__Instituti .oval................ -- ._.......................... 8.,_ 3. 46...:._ 84......................._ --._.........._.__ ............._.__._......._.__,...... 6 .._6.3......A....:_..._.__1_,._ 5.8._ 95__.........._.__............. ........ _...................--- ..... -................... _.................. ..................._...._...._; - ...... _................................................................. Total Zone 12 '...... .2.99.,.._9.5$..:..7.5......`........ _ ................... ._._._ .... .................................. --- _._... ........_Sub.- _total_.Al.l -.. Zones_......_.._ ------ _............ ........ ................... 58. 0..,._ 3. 9?_.._ 9. 7 ..... ....................._._... _._ ..... . - -- .................. .............. -_ -. .. - ._................ . ........ .__.- ... _ .............__._ ................ _.__............ .... -- ..... ............._.__._._...................___....................................... _Total _ .... _..._._......... ............................._._.__..... 933, 673.,97 ................._............. _ ....... ......_.__.................. _ .... .............................. ............... ....... . ** Includes Public Property EDUs As stated above, the assessment amounts noted above are the same as the amounts levied in FY 1999/2000, except for the proposed increase to the Zone 12 assessment. ad84 -01 . rpt 000006 AD84 -2 Engineer's Report March 24, 2000 Page 5 H. Zones of Benefit 1. General: There are no new Zones of Benefit proposed to be added in FY 2000/2001. 2. Zone Landscape Maintenance Assessment: The properties within each of the Zones of Benefit are assessed for the maintenance of certain designated landscaped areas deemed to be of benefit to the properties within that zone. 3. Storm Drain Debris Basin Maintenance: A portion of Zone 2, 5 and 10 are assessed for the maintenance of debris basins along the south boundary of the City. 4. Improvements: The lots within Zone 2 have in past years been assessed a $10 per lot improvement assessment for a future project to construct parkway landscaping on the north side of Tierra Rejada Road, east and west of Southhampton Road. It is proposed that this improvement assessment be assessed again in FY 2000/2001. With the FY 2000/2001 assessment, the total funds available in FY 2000/2001 for this construction project will be $39,672. I. Fiscal Analysis This report contains no information regarding projected Fund balances for the categories of assessments and expenditures noted above. Those figures will be developed as a part of the upcoming budget process for FY 2000/2001. The staff report to be presented to the City Council at the June 7 Public Hearing will include a Fiscal Analysis of the status of the Funds for Assessment District 84 -2. J. Deficits As you know, with the passage of Proposition 218, the assessment amounts may not be increased without prior approval of all affected property owners via Mail Ballot. Accordingly, in the event the fiscal analysis in the June report indicates that there will be a projected FY 2000/2001 (next year) year- end deficit in one or more of the Funds for the assessment categories noted in Section G above, staff may recommend that that a portion of the expenses which were to be charged to those Funds, be moved to another funding source. Such an action would, in effect, represent a subsidy from other sources to the programs traditionally funded by the AD84 -2 Assessment District. A second alternate would be to carry any deficit into the next year, noting that the deficit may be reduced or eliminated as the result of reduced costs in future years. A third option would be to pursue a future assessment increase via Mail Ballot approval. ad84- 01,rpt AD84 -2 Engineer's Report March 24, 2000 Page 6 K. Surpluses The fiscal analysis to be included in the June report may indicate that there will be a projected FY 1999/2000 (this year) year -end surplus in one or more of the Funds for the assessment categories noted in Section G above. Staff would recommend that such surpluses be carried over to the FY2000 /2001 and future fiscal years to accommodate fluctuations which occur in maintenance costs from year to year. However, if it is determined that the amount of the surplus for any given Fund is excessive, the final Engineer's Report can be amended to direct that an adjustment be made to the amount actually levied. In this way all of the amounts of the assessment for FY 2000/2001 and all future years remains unchanged - while the actual amount levied for certain categories is an amount less than the actual assessment. In this way the Fund balances for each of the assessments can be managed without having to reduce the actual assessment amounts and thereby impair the ability of the City to fund future program cost increases. L. Public Hearing The "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972" (Streets and Highways Code) requires a public hearing to be held prior to the annual levy of assessments for the purpose of receiving input and to hear any protests to the proposed assessments. Attached as Exhibit 2 is a copy of the Public Hearing Notice for AD84 -2. Said Notice will be published and posted as required by law. Said Notice sets the date of the public hearing as June 7, 2000, which is the first City Council meeting in June, as required by law. The Public Hearing Notice cites the assessment amounts set forth in the Engineer's Report. The City Council may revise the final assessment amounts any time prior to the adoption of the Resolution in June setting the amount of the assessments. Notices of the May 5 Public Hearing, pertaining to the increase to the Zone 12 assessment, were mailed to the owners of all properties affected by that proposed assessment increase. The assessments to all other properties will not increase. In order to contain costs, and to be consistent with City Council action two years ago, the Public Hearing Notice for the June 7 public hearing will not be mailed. ad84- 01.rpt 0000081 AD84 -2 Engineer's Report March 24, 2000 Page 7 RECOMMENDATION Adopt Resolution No. 2000 List of Exhibits: Exhibit 1: Engineer's Report Exhibit 2: Public Hearing Notice Exhibit 3: Resolution ad84- 01.rpt 000009 PRELIMINARY ENGINEER'S REPORT CITY OF MOORPARK LIGHTING MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. AD-84-2 LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972 AND PROPOSITION 218 PREPARED BY: CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES, INC. 371 Van Ness Way, Suite 200 Torrance, CA 90501 March 2000 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Section I Authority for Report 1 Section 2 Definition of Terms I Section 3 Method and Rates of Assessment I Section 4 Description of Improvements to be Maintained 6 Section 5 Assessment Roll 9 Section 6 Estimate of Cost 9 Appendix "A" Appendix "B" Appendix "C" Appendix "D" Appendix "E" Appendix "F" Appendix "G" Appendix "H" Street Lighting Formula - Table I Erosion and Flood Control Related Landscape Formula - Table 2 Assessment. Summary - Table 3 Budget Estimate Boundary Map Assessment Roll Resolutions Zone 12 Assessment Calculations CITY OF MOORPARK Engineer's Report Lighting Maintenance Assessment District No. AD -84 -2 Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972 and Proposition 218 For Fiscal Year 2000 -2001 SECTION 1 AUTHORITY FOR REPORT This report is prepared pursuant to City Council Resolution No. 2000 -1688, adopted January 5, 2000, to extend this District for the fiscal year commencing July 1, 2000 and ending June 30, 2001 in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, "Landscaping Act of 1972 ", being Part 2 of Division 15 of the California Streets and Highways Code and Proposition 218 which allows existing assessment districts to continue as long as rates and methodology remain the same. The District will provide electrical energy for public lighting facilities and for operation and maintenance of public lighting within the city. In addition, the District will provide for installation and/or maintenance of erosion and flood control related public landscaping within the public right -, of -way. SECTION 2 DEFINITION OF TERMS Assessment Rate - The assessment rate is the number assigned to each land use category. The assessment rate for a Level 1 Single Family Residential lot (land use code 1) is 1 for lighting assessment and 4 for erosion and flood control related landscape assessment. Assessment rates for other parcels in other land use categories, including publicly owned parcels, a re proportioned to these basic rates. These assessment rates remain unchanged. Methodology - The methodology is the formula used to derive the assessment rates of each land use category. The methodology has not been changed in several years. EDU [Equivalent Dwelling Unit] - For the purpose of determining the amount of the Zone 12 assessment to be levied upon public properties within Zone 12, each category of public property has been assigned an Equivalent Dwelling Unit [EDU] factor. 3 000012 SECTION 3 METHOD AND RATES OF ASSESSMENT Except for the changes to the Zone 12 assessment described below, the methodology and assessment rates used for Assessment District No. AD -84 -2 have not changed for the past several years, and are based on how the facilities being maintained provide benefits as part of the system of streets which serve the City of Moorpark. Lighting The benefits of street lighting are for the convenience, safety and protection of people and the security or protection of property, property improvements and goods. The intensity or degree of illumination provided can have a bearing on both. The single family home - Level 1 has been selected as the base unit for the spread of assessments. By definition, the single family home - Level 1 is a single family home located on a street that has existing streetlights. An assessment rate of 1.00 has been assigned to the base unit, which is composed of benefit factors, which correspond to the following types of benefit. People Use - People related benefits 0.50 Security Benefit - Property protection 0.25 Intensity - Degree of illumination 0.25 Assessment Rate: 1.00 Parcels in other land use categories, including publicly owned parcels, were then rated by comparison with the basic unit. (See the following table.) People Use - People related benefits 1. Reduction in night accidents and attendant human misery. 2. Reduced vulnerability to criminal assault during hours of darkness. 3. Promotion of business operations during evening hours. 4. Increased safety on roads and highways. Security Benefit - Property Protection I. Reduction in vandalism and other criminal acts, and damage to improvements. 2. Reduction in burglaries. Intensity: Intensity or degree of illumination provided on streets varies with type of street, date of installation and the use of the property adjacent thereto. 4 000013 Landscaping The landscaping element of the spread formula recognizes that all properties within the City benefit from the maintenance of the landscaping within public rights -of -way and easements. These benefits include improved safety resulting from a regular tree trimming program and improved street sweeping capabilities resulting from trimming trees which may otherwise interface with street sweeping operations. The method of spreading maintenance costs is based upon the assessment rates, and the assessment rates are determined by the "people use" attributed to each land use within the City. This method was chosen because the benefit received is directly proportionate to the number of people generated by each land use. Recognizing that residential land uses within the City derive a higher degree of benefit than non - residential land uses, the formula was subdivided into two main groups, with residential land uses contributing in 75% of the assessment and non - residential uses being assessed for the remaining 25% of the maintenance costs. The single family home has been selected as the base unit for the spread of assessment. An assessment rate of 4 has been assigned by the base unit. Parcels in other land use categories, including publicly owned parcels, were rated by comparison with the basic unit. (See the following table.) The "people use" factors utilized in determining assessment rates and in the assessment district spread formula are shown in Appendix "B ". Zone 12: Carlsberg Specific Plan a. Assessment Allocation: The maintenance costs for Zone 12 are allocated to the approved ultimate land uses within Zone 12 as .follows: ScienceDrive Parkways .................... - - __ .............___... . ._..............._...._...._._- _ Science Drive Slope Easements 1 ................. - __........._...._._.. ..........__.......- ..._._:.._. - -- ............._ Tierra Relada Rd Parkways & Slopes 1 - - - -- ........ .._ ..................__._o_... Tierra Ruda Median _....----------------- ._....___ __._ 0 .:............ - .._._.. ----....................__._.. . .....--- ..._...._..._......_... - -- .......... ........................... b. Exempt Properties: It has been determined that Water Utility and Flood Control properties receive no benefit from the proposed improvements. Accordingly, all such properties shall be exempt from the Zone 12 assessment. In addition, in that the portion of the total assessment allocated to the Institutional Properties is spread to only lots 3 and 4 of Tract 4974, the slope adjacent to Spring Road [AP #512 -0 -270 -065 is exempt. 5 00001 c. Equivalent Dwelling Units [EDO: A portion of the assessment allocated to Residential properties has been allocated to each public property within Zone 12, based upon the applicable number of EDUs for that public property. The EDUs assigned to various categories of public properties within Zone 12 are as follows: Category No. EDUs per Parcel • Schools: 1 • Parks: 1 • Water Utility Exempt • Flood Control Facility Exempt d. Annual Increase to Total Assessment Amount: 1. Base Year: The Base Year Total Assessment Amount for Zone 12 is the amount stated in the Engineer's Report for FY 2000/2001, said amount being $229,961.49. 2. Annual Increase: In years subsequent to FY 2000/2001, the Total Assessment amount for Zone 12 maybe increased to cover maintenance cost increases. 3. Basis of Increase: The amount of any increase to the Total Assessment for Zone 12 shall be based upon the increase to the Consumer Price Index (CPI) for all Urban Consumers for the Los Angeles Metropolitan Area, for the calendar year ending the December prior to the Fiscal Year of the proposed assessment. 4. Deferred Action: Each year when the amount of the Total Assessment for Zone 12 is determined, said amount may or may not be increased, as provided above, at the sole discretion of the City. 5. Assessment of Deferred Increase in Subsequent Years: Any increase to the Total Assessment for Zone 12 may include any increase deferred in any and all prior years. In such event, the approved Total Assessment may not exceed the Base Year Total Assessment Amount, adjusted to reflect the change in the CPI between the Base Year and the effective year of the proposed assessment. [Example: If the CPI increases 5% Year 3, but the assessment for Year 3 is increased by only 3 %, the remaining 2 % increase may be added to the assessment in any subsequent year.] 6. Increase Determined Invalidity: In the event any increase to the Total Assessment amount is held to be invalid or unconstitutional by any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the Base Year Total Assessment for Zone 12. SECTION 4 DESCRIPTION OF IMPROVEMENTS TO BE MAINTAINED This report covers the period of July 1, 2000 through June 30, 2001. An updated report is prepared each year to reflect updated annual costs and changes in parcelization. The improvements to be maintained in this District include all City -owned and Southern California Edison (S.C.E.) -owned streetlights as well as all medians and street trees within public rights -of -way within the boundaries of the city. 6 000015 Lighting maintenance shall include, but is not limited to, energy costs, removal, repair, replacement or relocation of light standards, poles, bulbs, fixtures and all appurtenances. Servicing of S.C.E. owned lights as defined in Section 22538 of the Streets and Highways Code shall be furnished by the Southern California Edison Company or its successors, or this servicing shall be as authorized by the Public Utilities Commission, State of California. Maintenance of City -owned lighting improvements shall be furnished by the City. Landscape maintenance for erosion and flood control shall include, but is not limited to watering, fertilizing, mowing, weed control, shrubbery, tree removal and pruning, removal and replacement of dead growth, maintenance of irrigation facilities and other necessary work. In addition, the cost to maintain improved areas within certain Zones of Benefit will be borne by owners of property within said zone. Those Zones of Benefit are generally described as follows: 1. Tract No. 2851: Maintenance costs associated with landscaping in the Ventura County Flood Control Easement and portions of the interior tract entry areas. The obligation upon these 75 lots is pursuant to a condition of development. 2. Tract No. 2865: Cost for maintenance of specific landscape areas and debris basins within the tract, including landscaping at Christian Barrett & Spring Roads; Tierra Rejada landscaping, and Peach Hill Road landscaping on east side between Christian Barrett and Tierra Rejada Roads, and the entry monument sign at Christian Barrett and Spring Road. Also, an additional assessment for the improvement of parkway landscaping on the north side of Tierra Rejada Road east and west of Southhampton Road. The obligation upon the lots within this tract is pursuant to a condition of development. 3. Tract No. 3032: Maintenance costs associated with landscaping an entry monument at Buttercreek Road and Los Angeles Avenue. This cost to be spread to the 265 lots within the tract. 4. Tract No. 3274: Maintenance costs associated with landscape areas along Williams Ranch Road parkway adjacent to Peach Hill drain channel and Edison entries within PC -3. This cost will be borne by the 129 lots within the tract. 5. Tract Nos. 3019 & 3525: Maintenance costs associated with debris basins and landscaping the Tierra Rejada Road slope and parkway areas and parkway on the west side of Peach Hill Road between Williams Ranch and Tierra Rejada Roads within Tract Nos. 3019 and 3525. The cost is to be spread to the 217 lots within the tracts. 6. Tract 3306: Cost for maintenance of landscape areas within Tract 3306 at the westerly terminus of Inglewood Street. The cost is to be spread to the 22 lots within the tract. 7 000016 7. Los Angeles Avenue Parkway: Maintenance costs associated with landscaping the parkway on the north side of Los Angeles Avenue between Gabbert Road and Shasta Avenue will be borne by all industrial lots northerly of Los Angeles Avenue, southerly of Poindexter Avenue, easterly of Gabbert Road, and westerly of Shasta Avenue. 8. Home Acres Buffer Area: Maintenance costs associated with the buffer area at the west end of the West Ranch area, is to be split 50 -50 between the residential properties within the West ranch area and the area outside the City known as Home Acres. That portion of this Zone of Benefit with the City consists of the residential areas within Tract 4340, 4341, 4792 and a portion of tract 4342. This area is bounded on the north by the Arroyo Simi, on the east by Tierra Rejada Road and the Commercial property at the corner of Tierra Rejada Road and Mountain Trail Street, . on the south by Tracts 4637, 4342 -5 and the City boundary and on the west by the City Boundary. 9. Condor Drive Industrial Park: Maintenance costs associated with the parkway located at the northwest corner of Los Angeles Avenue and Virginia Colony Place will be borne by the developed parcels within the Industrial park on Condor Drive (Tract 3492). 10. PC -3: Maintenance costs associated with landscaping and debris basins within this area will be borne by all properties within the Mountain Meadows Planned Community (PC -3). The landscaping to be maintained consists of the Peach Hill Wash Linear Park, the slope along the north side of the Peach Hill Wash and the downstream flood control facility located just east of Mountain Trail Street and certain parkways on Tierra Rejada Road. 11. Tract 4174: Maintenance costs associated with landscaping within this area will be borne by all properties within the tract. 12. Carlsberg Specific Plan: Maintenance costs associated with certain landscape improvements as described in the Boundary Map for Zone 12 included in Appendix "E ". The cost for the maintenance of these improvements will be borne by all of the properties. within Zone 12 as defined in said Boundary Maps and generally described as that area bounded by the Route 23 freeway, Tierra Rejada Road, Spring Road, the Arroyo Simi and New Los Angeles Avenue. Plans and specifications for the irrigation, landscaping and lighting of streets, parks and easements, and other authorized improvements within the City are on file in the Department of Public Works. The lighting locations and specifications for Edison- owned lights are on file with the Southern California Edison Company. Reference is hereby made to said plans and specifications for the exact location and nature of the landscape and lighting improvements. Said plans and specifications by reference are hereby made apart of this report. SECTION 5 ASSESSMENT ROLL All parcels of real property affected are listed on the "Assessment Roll ", Exhibit "A," which will be on file in City Hall with the City Clerk, and is made a part hereof by reference. These parcels are more particularly described in maps prepared in accordance with Section 327 of the Revenue and Taxation Code which are on file in the office of the Ventura County Assessor in the County Government Center Administration Building, 800 S. Victoria Avenue, Ventura, California and which are also made a part hereof by reference. SECTION 6 COST ESTIMATE . The City staff recommendation for the District budget is shown in Appendix "D" of this report. The costs attributed to landscaping and the costs attributed to lighting will be separately appointed, according to the formula, and added together to constitute the total assessment for each parcel. CONCLUSION In conclusion, it is our opinion that the assessments within Lighting Maintenance Assessment District No. AD -84 -2 are apportioned by a formula that fairly distributes the net cost in accordance with the ,benefits that are received.. The assessment rates and methodology remain the same for the past several years. 9 USE CODE 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 9 10 11 12 15 16 17 18 19 21 24 25 26 30 31 32 33 38 CITY OF MOORPARK Lighting Maintenance Assessment District No. AD -84 -2 Assessment Rates LIGHTING ASSESSMENT DESCRIPTION RATE RESIDENTIAL VACANT SINGLE FAMILY, LEVEL 1 MOBILE HOME CONDO RESIDENTIAL INCOME, 2 - 4 UNITS APARTMENTS (5+ UNITS) SINGLE FAMILY, LEVEL 2 MOBILE HOME & TRAILER PARKS COMMERCIAL VACANT RETAIL STORES, SINGLE STORY STORE & OFFICE (COMBINATION) SHOPPING CENTERS (NEIGHBORHOOD) SHOPPING CENTERS (REGIONAL) OFFICE BUILDING (1 STORY) OFFICE STORES (MULTI- STORY) RETAIL STORES (MULTI - STORY) RESTAURANTS & COCKTAIL LOUNGE BANKS, SAVINGS & LOANS SERVICE STATIONS AUTO SALES, REPAIR INDUSTRIAL VACANT LAND LIGHT MANUFACTURING WAREHOUSING INDUSTRIAL CONDOS, CO -OPS, PUD'S MINERAL PROCESSING LANDSCAPE ASSESSMENT RATE 0.25 0 1 4 0 0 1 3 1 3 0.75 3 0.75 4 0.75 3 0.25 0 4 3 4 3 6.5 10 6.5 30 3 3 4 6 4 6 5 3 3 3 4 3 4 1 0.25 0 5 12 4 4 5 3 3 3 44 TRUCK CORPS 1 2 46 PASTURE (PERMANENT) l 2 48 POULTRY 1 2 49 FLOWERS, SEED PRODUCTION 1 2 10 00009 USE CODE 51 53 54 55 57 61 69 70 71 72 73 78 79 80 81 83 88 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 99 DESCRIPTION LIGHTING ASSESSMENT RATE LANDSCAPE ASSESSMENT RATE ORCHARDS 1 2 FIELD CROPS, DRY 1 2 PASTURE OF GRAZE, DRY 1 2 FEED LOTS 1 2 TREE FARMS 1 2 THEATER 5 2 PARKS 0 0 INSTITUTIONAL VACANT LAND 0.25 0 CHURCHES, CONVENT, RECTORY 0.25 0 SCHOOLS 0 0 COLLEGES 0 0 PUBLIC BLDGS., FIREHOUSES, MUSEUMS, ETC. 0 0 FLOOD CONTROL 0 0 MISCELLANEOUS VACANT LAND 0.25 0 UTILITY WATER COMPANY 0 0 PETROLEUM && GAS 2 1 WATER RIGHTS, PUMPS 0 0 HIGHWAYS & STREETS 0 0 UTILITY EDISON 0 0 TELEPHONE 0 0 S.P.R.R. 0 0 UNDEDICATED COMMUNITY CONDO DEV. 0 0 STATE PROPERTY 0 0 COUNTY PROPERTY 0 0 CITY PROPERTY 0 0 EXEMPT 0 0 11 000020 APPENDICES APPENDIX A STREET LIGHTING FORMULA USE 12 15 16 17 18 19 21 24 25 26 30 31 32' 33 38 APPENDIX A CITY OF MOORPARK Lighting Maintenance Assessment District No. AD -84 -2 Table 1 Street Lighting Formula DESCRIPTION RESIDENTIAL VACANT SINGLE FAMILY, LEVEL 1 MOBILE HOME CONDO RESIDENTIAL INCOME, 2 - 4 UNITS APARTMENTS (5+ UNITS) SINGLE FAMILY, LEVEL 2 MOBILE HOME & TRAILER PARKS COMMERCIAL VACANT RETAIL STORES, SINGLE STORY STORE & OFFICE (COMBINATION) SHOPPING CENTERS (NEIGHBORHOOD) SHOPPING CENTERS (REGIONAL) OFFICE BUILDING (1 STORY) OFFICE STORES (MULTI- STORY) RETAIL STORES (MULTI- STORY) RESTAURANTS & COCKTAIL LOUNGE BANKS, SAVINGS & LOANS' SERVICE STATIONS' AUTO SALES, REPAIR INDUSTRIAL VACANT LAND LIGHT MANUFACTURING WAREHOUSING INDUSTRIAL CONDOS, CO -OPS, PUD'S MINERAL PROCESSING 01w ASSESSMENT RATE 0.25 1 0 1 1 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.25 4 4 6.5 6.5 3 4 0.25 5 4 5 3 ANNUAL LIGHTING ASSESSMENT 5.21 20.85 0.00 20.85 20.85 15.64 15.64 15.64 5.21 83.41 83.41 135.54 135.54 62.56 83.41 83.41 104.26 62.56 83.41 83.41 5.21 104.26 83.41 104.26 62.56 USE CODE 44 46 48 49 51 53 54 55 57 61 69 70 71 72 73 78 79 80 81 83 86 88 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 99 DESCRIPTION TRUCK CORPS PASTURE (PERMANENT) POULTRY FLOWERS, SEED PRODUCTION ORCHARDS FIELD CROPS, DRY PASTURE OF GRAZE, DRY FEED LOTS TREE FARMS THEATER PARKS INSTITUTIONAL VACANT LAND CHURCHES, CONVENT, RECTORY SCHOOLS COLLEGES PUBLIC BLDGS., FIREHOUSES, MUSEUMS, ETC. FLOOD CONTROL MISCELLANEOUS VACANT LAND UTILITY WATER COMPANY PETROLEUM & GAS WATER RIGHTS, PUMPS HIGHWAYS & STREETS UTILITY EDISON TELEPHONE S.P.R.R. UNDEDICATED COMMUNITY CONDO DEV. STATE PROPERTY COUNTY PROPERTY CITY PROPERTY EXEMPT A -2 ASSESSMENT RATE 1 1 1 1 1 l 1 1 1 5 0 0.25 0.25 0 0 0 0 0.25 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ANNUAL LIGHTING ASSESSMENT 20.85 20.85 20.85 20.85 20.85 20.85 20.85 20.85 20.85 104.26 0.00 5.21 5.21 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.21 0.00 41.71 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Mr, JI APPENDIX B LANDSCAPE FORMULA APPENDIX B CITY OF MOORPARK Lighting Maintenance Assessment District No. AD -84 -2 Table 2 Landscape Maintenance Formula USE ASSESSMENT CODE DESCRIPTION RATE ANNUAL LANDSCAPE ASSESSMENT 0 RESIDENTIAL VACANT 0 0.00 1 SINGLE FAMILY, LEVEL 1 4 13.18 2 MOBILE HOME 0 0.00 3 CONDO 3 9.89 4 RESIDENTIAL INCOME, 2 - 4 UNITS 3 9.89 5 APARTMENTS (5+ UNITS) 3 9.88 6 SINGLE FAMILY, LEVEL 2 4 13.18 9 MOBILE HOME & TRAILER PARKS 3 9.88 10 COMMERCIAL VACANT 0 11 RETAIL STORES, SINGLE STORY 3 0.00 51.71 12 STORE & OFFICE (COMBINATION) 3 15 SHOPPING CENTERS (NEIGHBORHOOD) 10 51.71 16 SHOPPING CENTERS (REGIONAL) 30 172.38 17 OFFICE BUILDING (1 STORY) 3 517.15 18 OFFICE STORES (MULTI- STORY) 6 51.71 103.43 19 RETAIL STORES (MULTI - STORY) 6 21 RESTAURANTS & COCKTAIL LOUNGE 3 103.43 24 BANKS, SAVINGS & LOANS 3 51.71 25 SERVICE STATIONS 3 51.71 26 AUTO SALES, REPAIR 1 51.71 17.24 30 INDUSTRIAL VACANT LAND 0 31 LIGHT MANUFACTURING 12 0.00 32 WAREHOUSING 4 206.86 33 INDUSTRIAL CONDOS, CO -OPS, PUD'S 3 68.95 51.71 38 MINERAL PROCESSING 3 51.71 USE CODE DESCRIPTION 44 TRUCK CORPS 46 PASTURE (PERMANENT) 48 POULTRY 49 FLOWERS, SEED PRODUCTION 51 ORCHARDS 53 FIELD CROPS, DRY 54 PASTURE OF GRAZE, DRY 55 FEED LOTS 57 TREE FARMS 61 THEATER 69 PARKS 70 INSTITUTIONAL VACANT LAND 71 CHURCHES, CONVENT, RECTORY 72 SCHOOLS 73 COLLEGES 78 PUBLIC BLDGS., FIREHOUSES, MUSEUMS, ETC. 79 FLOOD CONTROL 80 MISCELLANEOUS VACANT LAND 81 UTILITY WATER COMPANY 83 PETROLEUM & GAS 86 WATER RIGHTS, PUMPS 88 HIGHWAYS & STREETS 91 UTILITY EDISON 92 TELEPHONE 93 S.P.R.R. 94 UNDEDICATED COMMUNITY CONDO DEV. 95 STATE PROPERTY 96 COUNTY PROPERTY 97 CITY PROPERTY 99 EXEMPT ASSESSMENT RATE 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ANNUAL LANDSCAPE ASSESSMENT 34.48 34.48 34.48 34.48 34.48 34.48 34.48 34.48 34.48 34.48 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 17.24 all 1 11 1 i1 1 11 ,1 11 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 000027 B -2 Appendix "B" (Cont.) Notes: 1. In addition to the landscape charge on the previous table, 75 lots within Tract No. 2851 are assessed an additional landscape maintenance assessment for a portion of the Ventura County Flood Control Easement immediately north of Campus Park Dive, as well as portions of the parkway landscaping at the entrance to and within the interior of Tract 2851. The additional per lot assessment is $129.37. The obligation upon these lots is pursuant to a condition of development. 2. In addition to the landscape charge on the previous table, 622 lots within Tract 2865 are assessed an additional landscape maintenance assessment for the maintenance of specific landscape areas and debris basins within the tract. The landscaped areas include certain parkways, the Tierra Rejada Road slope and streetscape areas, and the monument sign within the tract. Also, an additional $10 assessment will be levied upon each lot to fund the future construction of parkway landscape improvements on the north side of Tierra Rejada Road east and west of Southhampton Road. The additional per lot assessment is $116.47. Forty - eight (48) lots are assessed an additional $29.17 per lot for the maintenance of the debris basins. The obligation upon these lots is pursuant to a condition of development. 3. In addition to the landscape charge on the previous table, 265 lots within Tract No. 3032 are assessed an additional landscape maintenance assessment for the maintenance of an entry monument at Butter Creek Road and Los Angeles Avenue and landscaping on the south side of Pepper Mill Street. The additional per lot assessment is $11.62. 4. In addition to the landscape charge on the previous table, 129 lots within Tract No. 3274 are assessed an additional landscape maintenance assessment for the maintenance of the landscaped barrier in Williams Ranch Road at the Edison power lines, and the parkway landscaping on both sides of Williams Ranch Road east and west of the Edison Easement. The additional per lot assessment is $49.48. The obligation upon these lots is pursuant to a condition of development. 5. In addition to the landscape charge on the previous table, 217 lots within Tract Nos. 3019 and 3525 are assessed an additional landscape maintenance assessment for the maintenance of the Tierra Rejada Road slope and parkways, including the entry statements at Pheasant Run Street, and the parkway on the west side of Peach Hill Road between Williams Ranch and Tierra Rejada Roads. The additional per lot assessment is $107.56. Seventy -five (75) lots are assessed fef an additional $6.67 per lot for the maintenance of debris basins. The obligation upon these lots is pursuant to a condition of development. 6. In addition to the landscape charge on the previous table, 22 lots within Tract No. 3306 are assessed an additional landscape maintenance assessment for the maintenance of landscape area at the westerly terminus of Inglewood Street. The additional per lot assessment is $42.00. The obligation upon these lots is pursuant to a condition of development. 00th B -3 7. In addition to the landscape charge on the previous table, 90+ AC northerly of Los Angeles Avenue, southerly of Poindexter Avenue, and between Gabbert and Shasta Avenues are assessed an additional landscape maintenance assessment for the maintenance of the parkway on the north side of Los Angeles Avenue Parkway. The additional assessment amount is $123.15 per acre. 8. In addition to the landscape charge on the previous table, 492 residential units within Tracts 4340, 4341, 4792 and a portion of Tract 4342 are assessed an additional $15.40 for fifty percent (50 %) of the maintenance costs for the Home Acres Buffer area. The remaining fifty percent (50 %) of such costs are recovered via an assessment upon 201 lots in the Home Acres area, in the amount of $37.69 per lot. This is the total amount of the assessment on the lots within Home Acres. Said lots are not assessed for Citywide lighting or landscaping. 9. In addition to the landscape charge on the previous table, 49± AC within the Industrial Park on Condor Drive are assessed an additional landscape maintenance assessment for the maintenance of the parkway located at the southwest corner of Los Angeles Avenue and Virginia Colony Place. The additional assessment amount is $27.43 per acre. 10. In addition to the landscape charge on the previous table, 2448 residential lots and one commercial property within the Mountain Meadows Planned Community (PC -3) are assessed an additional landscape maintenance assessment for the maintenance of the landscaping within the Peach Hill Wash Linear Park, the slope along the north side of the Peach Hill Wash and the downstream flood control facility located just east of Mountain Trail Street and within certain parkways along Tierra Rejada Road. The additional per lot assessment for residential properties is $76.55, and the assessment upon the commercial property at the southwest corner of Mountain Trail Street and Tierra Rejada Road is $615.71 per acre [118.81 ac x 8EDU /ac. = 95 EDU >> x $76.55/EDU = $7,272.25 / 11.81 ac = $615.71]. Six hundred and sixty -nine (669) lots are assessed an additional $10.84 per lot for the maintenance of debris basins. The obligation upon these lots is pursuant to a condition of development. 11. In addition to the landscape charge on the previous table, 9 lots within Tract No. 4174 are assessed an additional landscape maintenance assessment for the maintenance of parkway landscaping within the tract. The additional per lot assessment is $337.78. 12. In addition to the above landscape charges, all of the properties within the Carlsberg Specific Plan are assessed an additional amount for the maintenance of certain parkways, medians and slope areas, as described in the Boundary Maps set forth in Appendix "E ". The total assessment amount is allocated to ultimate land use categories in accordance with the chart set forth in Section 4 of this report. Based upon that allocation chart, the total assessment amount cited in Appendix 'D` of this report is spread to all of the properties within Zone 12. The amount of the assessment for each land use category is as follows: Commercial / Industrial: 98.79 AC $ 139.84 /Acre Institutional 6.63 AC $1,258.95 / Acre Residential 538 EDUs $ 386.24 / Lot or EDU B -4 000029 7. In addition to the landscape charge on the previous table, 90+ AC northerly of Los Angeles Avenue, southerly of Poindexter Avenue, and between Gabbert and ,Shasta Avenues are assessed an additional landscape maintenance assessment for the maintenance of the parkway on the north side of Los Angeles Avenue Parkway. The additional assessment amount is $123.15 per acre. 8. In addition to the landscape charge on the previous table, 492 residential units within Tracts 4340, 4341, 4792 and a portion of Tract 4342 are assessed an additional $15.40 for fifty percent (50 %) of the maintenance costs for the Home Acres Buffer area. The remaining fifty percent (50 %) of such costs are recovered via an assessment upon 201 lots in the Home Acres area, in the amount of $37.69 per lot. This is the total amount of the assessment on the lots within Home Acres. Said lots are not assessed for Citywide lighting or landscaping. 9. In addition to the landscape charge on the previous table, 49± AC within the Industrial Park on Condor Drive are assessed an additional landscape maintenance assessment for the maintenance of the parkway located at the southwest corner of Los Angeles Avenue and Virginia Colony Place. The additional assessment amount is $27.43 per acre. 10. In addition to the landscape charge on the previous table, 2448 residential lots and one commercial property within the Mountain Meadows Planned Community (PC -3) are assessed an additional landscape maintenance assessment for the maintenance of the landscaping within the Peach Hill Wash Linear Park, the slope along the north side of the Peach Hill Wash and the downstream flood control facility located just east of Mountain Trail Street and within certain parkways along Tierra Rejada Road. The additional per lot assessment for residential properties is $76.55, and the assessment upon the commercial property at the southwest corner of Mountain Trail Street and Tierra Rejada Road is $615.71 per acre [118.81 ac x 8EDU /ac. = 95 EDU >> x $76.55/EDU = $7,272.25 / 11.81 ac = $615.71]. Six hundred and sixty -nine (669) lots are assessed an additional $10.84 per lot for the maintenance of debris basins. The obligation upon these lots is pursuant to a condition of development. 11. In addition to the landscape charge on the previous table, 9 lots within Tract No. 4174 are assessed an additional landscape maintenance assessment for the maintenance of parkway landscaping within the tract. The additional per lot assessment is $337.78. 12. In addition to the above landscape charges, all of the properties within the Carlsberg Specific Plan are assessed an additional amount for the maintenance of certain parkways, medians and slope areas, as described in the Boundary Maps set forth in Appendix "E ". The total assessment amount is allocated to ultimate land use categories in accordance with the chart set forth in Section 4 of this report. Based upon that allocation chart, the total assessment amount cited in Appendix 'D' of this report is spread to all of the properties within Zone 12. Derivation of the assessment amounts for Zone 12 are shown in Appendix 'H' and summarized as follows: Commercial /Industrial: 98.79 AC $ 139.84 /Acre Institutional 6.63 AC $1,258.95 /Acre Residential 538 EDUs $ 386.24 / Lot or EDU B -4 000030 APPENDIX C ASSESSMENT SUMMARY APPENDIX C CITY OF MOORPARK Lighting Maintenance Assessment District No. AD -84 -2 Table 3 TOTAL ANNUAL ASSESSMENT 5.21 34.03 0.00 30.74 30.74 5 APARTMENTS (5+ UNITS) Assessment Summary 15.64 25.52 6 ANNUAL ANNUAL USE 28.82 LANDSCAPE LIGHTING CODE DESCRIPTION ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT 0 RESIDENTIAL VACANT 0.00 5.21 1 SINGLE FAMILY, LEVEL 1 13.18 20.85 2 MOBILE HOME 0.00 0.00 3 CONDO 9.89 20.85 4 RESIDENTIAL INCOME, 2 - 4 UNITS 9.89 20.85 TOTAL ANNUAL ASSESSMENT 5.21 34.03 0.00 30.74 30.74 5 APARTMENTS (5+ UNITS) 9.88 15.64 25.52 6 SINGLE FAMILY, LEVEL 2 13.18 15.64 28.82 9 MOBILE HOME & TRAILER PARKS 9.88 15.64 25.52 10 COMMERCIAL VACANT 0.00 5.21 5.21 11 RETAIL STORES, SINGLE STORY 51.71 83.41 135.12 12 STORE & OFFICE (COMBINATION) 51.71 83.41 135.12 15 SHOPPING CENTERS (NEIGHBORHOOD) 172.38 135.54 307.92 16 SHOPPING CENTERS (REGIONAL) 517.15 135.54 652.69 17 OFFICE BUILDING (1 STORY) 51.71 62.56 114.27 18 OFFICE STORES (MULTI- STORY) 103.43 83.41 186.84 19 RETAIL STORES (MULTI- STORY) 103.43 83.41 186.84 21 RESTAURANTS & COCKTAIL LOUNGE 51.71 104.26 155.97 24 BANKS, SAVINGS & LOANS 51.71 62.56 114.27 25 SERVICE STATIONS 51.71 83.41 135.12 26 AUTO SALES, REPAIR 17.24 83.41 100.65 30 INDUSTRIAL VACANT LAND 0.00 5.21 5.21 31 LIGHT MANUFACTURING 206.86 104.26 311.12 32 WAREHOUSING 68.95 83.41 152.36 33 INDUSTRIAL CONDOS, CO -OPS, PUD'S 51.71 104.26 155.97 38 MINERAL PROCESSING 51.71 62.56 114.27 C -1 ANNUAL ANNUAL TOTAL USE LANDSCAPE LIGHTING ANNUAL CODE DESCRIPTION ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT 44 TRUCK CORPS 34.48 20.85 55.33 46 PASTURE (PERMANENT) 34.48 20.85 55.33 48 POULTRY 34.48 20.85 55.33 49 FLOWERS, SEED PRODUCTION 34.48 , 20.85 55.33 51 ORCHARDS 34.48 20.85 55.33 53 FIELD CROPS, DRY 34.48 20.85 55.33 54 PASTURE OF GRAZE, DRY 34.48 20.85 55.33 55 FEED LOTS 34.48 20.85 55.33 57 TREE FARMS 34.48 20.85 55.33 61 THEATER 34.48 104.26 138.74 69 PARKS 0.00 0.00 0.00 70 INSTITUTIONAL VACANT LAND 0.00 5.21 5.21 71 CHURCHES, CONVENT, RECTORY 0.00 5.21 5.21 72 SCHOOLS 0.00 0.00 0.00 73 COLLEGES 0.00 0.00 0.00 78 PUBLIC BUILDINGS, FIREHOUSES, 0.00 0.00 0.00 MUSEUMS, ETC. 79 FLOOD CONTROL 0.00 0.00 0.00 80 MISCELLANEOUS VACANT LAND 0.00 5.21 5.21 81 UTILITY WATER COMPANY 0.00 0.00 0.00 83 PETROLEUM & GAS 17.24 41.71 58.95 86 WATER RIGHTS, PUMPS 0.00 0.00 0.00 88 HIGHWAYS & STREETS 0.00 0.00 0,00 91 UTILITY EDISON 0.00 0.00 0.00 92 TELEPHONE 0.00 0.00 0.00 93 S.P.R.R. 0.00 0.00 0.00 94 UNDEDICATED COMMUN. CONDO DEV. 0.00 0.00 0.00 95 STATE PROPERTY 0.00 0.00 0.00 96 COUNTY PROPERTY 0.00 0.00 0.00 97 CITY PROPERTY 0.00 0.00 0.00 99 EXEMPT 0.00 0.00 0.00 000033 G2 APPENDIX D BUDGET ESTIMATE APPENDIX D CITY OF MOORPARK Lighting Maintenance Assessment District No. AD -84 -2 Budget Estimate FY 2000 -2001 ZONES OF BENEFIT 1. Tract No. 2851 Interior Parkway & Flood Control Channel 2. Tract No. 2865 Pacifica & Pardee: Landscape Debris Basins Improvements 3. Tract No. 3032 11. Tract No. 4174 Colmer 12. Carlsberg Specific Plan: Residential Commercial /Industrial Institutional $9,702.75 $66,224.00 $1,400.16 $6,220.00 $3,079.30 $6,382.92 $23,400.00 $500.00 $924.00 $11.199.63 $15,152.00 $1,349.83. $187,394.40 $7,272.24 $7,251.96 $3.040.00 $207,797.12 $13,814.79 $8,346.84 SUBTOTAL: $580,391.97 D -1 000035 Buttercreek & Peppermill 4. Tract No. 3274 Williams Ranch Road 5. Tract no. 3019.3025 Warmington: Landscape Debris Basins 6. Tract No. 3306 Glenhaven (Inglewood) 7. Los Angeles Avenue North Side Parkway 8. West Village Buffer Area 9. Condor Parkway 10. Peach Hill Wash: Landscape: Residential Landscape: Commercial Debris Basins 11. Tract No. 4174 Colmer 12. Carlsberg Specific Plan: Residential Commercial /Industrial Institutional $9,702.75 $66,224.00 $1,400.16 $6,220.00 $3,079.30 $6,382.92 $23,400.00 $500.00 $924.00 $11.199.63 $15,152.00 $1,349.83. $187,394.40 $7,272.24 $7,251.96 $3.040.00 $207,797.12 $13,814.79 $8,346.84 SUBTOTAL: $580,391.97 D -1 000035 BUDGET ESTIMATE FY 2000 -2001 Citywide Street Lighting Assessment $204,757.00 Citywide Landscaping Assessment $148,525.00 Sub - total Citywide Assessments $353,282.00 Sub -total Zone Assessments $580,391.97 Total Assessments $933,673.97 D -2 00003G APPENDIX E BOUNDARY MAP .0 0 Boundary Map, City of Moorpark Lighting. and Landscaping Maintenance Assessment District No. AD -84 -2 District Boundary Zone of Benifit t: © LLF s A 5 � A ri 4 � f 4 xv 4 oL 33'y i3`�ei�`.a -..h ,' i^'�+'- S -J,` .K +. at ✓ "- f v: • D L k' • 1` Z N -V 2XLfl5 42 "RCP 'RC 36 "RCP 5 24 "RCP a SLOPE ti D RF�goq SUN 24 "RCPT PL oy CITY OF MOORPF D.B. VENTURA COUK Debris Basin Maintenance Detail Legend 11910199 Parkway Maintained by Zone Assessment Lots Assessed for Debris Basin Cleaninc WMM Zp?%�E 3 = -T 3032 ' - ® ®® Parkway Maintained by Zone Assessment i Zd- • - 3274- Now i ®® Parkway Maintained by Zone Assessment E Zone 5 Debris Basin Maintenance Detail 7'P%CP -24"RCP 02 r L-Lt) I L�::Z V 'I _n Parkway Maintained by Zone Assessment- ICI L� e*`rr ...sue.,, rABBERT 'oo ' Mil�• Irn Z • rTT� t N ICI L� A Mil�• j';': N m1 MAl1i-- Rr EN = LW RD. GABBER at CE A DSO N �S' 0 c z w > s` C U2 (t iA ¢1 Z it S2+ t I J r� Z .J 001 o �@ r,+UDOw "RCr DR'v AR&() RHu 42 RCP O �W 36 'RCP "� O CITY OF MOORPARK - VENTURA COUNTY: (MAY GO EAST) D.B. t7 N (D 0 �i (D N. V1 N O 500' z Q (D Sv N 0 (t M Li CD v (D rt a ?7 "F 1 h 500' l 36 "RCP 02 "RCF a m ro0 �ntocD rt H- rD (D In H : W O a w ta0 0 m M (D N o�W a N CfTY OF MOORPARK VENTURA COUNTY- zorAL ! ` Legend Parkway Maintained by Zone Assessment t1111ufthi�fuyr� Possible Future' Maintenance 89RM RIB 3 74 .,� 2 rh \•6 ss' I _�`- > o .. 3 .�'• L:.o. 28 _ 14 �29J 3 " L•23.16' 276A- L•2 ta.l l' Z ^ .7' 22.9 e' N.6 4 31 1 <9.]4' R• <7T.3 o' L • Z6.l7• ^ COURT R•L lZ� N19°l506.E ��. �.J< Wo 75. > = 1 "!° ALYSSAS L.222.39' 13 Is Q NII•.'31•f 1<0.31 R.321 76 TRACT .e _ t!< 7 - 12 '� 9. Z. 8 < 3Q 130AIR IB Sz 3070 -1 30• 31 32 N.•oz'vx 10 b -29 131 5 28 SEE DETAIL A O 9 17 O 444 ":J 4 j 13 O 27 i4 5 52 = 51 50 49 48 47 46 i a 8 � 4. 45 7 Nz•te'ic". zs o]' 7 16 19 O IZ 26 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 a. 6O 6 r 20 6O II 25 C) O 0 9� 5O 5 s , 2r 7O !0 24 Z O 28 27 26 O O O 2f a s 2 16 a. i O 4 !3' 22 O O 2J w m 61 60 59 56 57 56. ..fi. .�q. 53 f z O 3 BAMB1. ^_° IA COURT DETAIL O 2 Z NO SCALE ^oo'u•x Q U' 33 34 35. 36 37 38' 39 40 41 Na O 2W O O O 0 O O O 42 43 !4 45 46 47 ro rr z r3 wO rs N�.• t,•x • °p CAMPUS TRACT 17 3583-2 PARK i TRACT f (j 3583 -1 ZbKK 1 ` 24 P•���E r 6N E ,° 0 10052 to 3 512 -26 LOS 17.8,V . i AIa,sVss°f w y r2 B * y Ia[ 2 29.0OAc. 1.52k n .6 Q 2 � y p 6.66Ac. Z� 1•. ,�. �Cf G� p4P �R 11.68Ac: 1 'F 7K i6. y� ,�(IPpTpT .yy.� K U 16 y.µssaM` acs] u..ln:� Y'b. m v p J3.04Ac.. -�L J.684c. '`z e+!iv 31.06Ac. F 9� tj ��,sfc p is x rw .. � ✓ I.T wJC V b. °Z hnTSx6E aaTObl 'E avv nee• g'2 ��.t xcs°�K xst.ar mw °bt wn. „s Sys 13 X60' xxy�"se'ss'E resod os -1� - LDf pal 8' _ :sr S e �. wRab} p1,Vb2 82.OQ4c, 1 F �h ��j�• �•� 9.01Ac.vrroy 7.5 .7 9Y. r .bb ,Stt az "4y's+ B9Ac P— 4 OS -Z 5D7 F 4p46 « `g ess.rr n v. •''14, .ga s Q 6 loi ¢ rkt.64Ac.=A g � yo,l.ar i5 �� 512 -27 ,.vnxe e n 'L6f r it 5.59Ac. Tract 4973, M.R. 8k b= Ao. . 13n �, - 75.09 t Bk. 50D $ �' W J a �- ,�.. , xj 80.04Ac R T �p 1i !o( 2 e. 4 �.. 57.J2Aa Bk. 507 0' yQ . b P$: +A 6 4 2. afSCtlpg7 Tract 4974, M.R. Bk.130. Pa. NOTES: AP NO. ACRES 500 -0- 350 -505 14.73 500 -0- 350 -525 4,26 18.99 ID 1.954c. fa! 5 Q ,09.66Ac. s'o< MOORPARK -7: COMMERCIAL SITE COMMERCIAL SITE L LOT I OT 4 S-2 RESIDENTIAL COMMUN11Y 'COMMERCIAL SITE L6i2. FREEWAY NOTE: ALL CORNER ENTRY STATEMENTS ARE EXCLUDED RESIDENTIAL PARKWAYS / INSIDE R.0 0 SCIENCE DRIVE MEDIAN LANDSCAPE EASEMEN (OUTSIDE R.O.W.) Q j I,I PJ06r1PAR!( FM VA "! �. LA 1' OPEN SFACE %. QQQ CO UERCIAL SITE COMMERCIAL SITE V'l - - /. /.. Y I i J I LOT 1 LOT 4 os- =Pv PARl< IS Ssj � CMAMERCIAL SITE � I . • - . � � / . -, ...., -. �. LOT 2 ��� ..J. L, t)Tv AR:i VIIL•r .;11`01 - spa =• w LOT ILL -914 ,1._ �IS. PARKWAYS I INSIDE R.O. MEDIANS LANDSCAPE EASEMENTf (OUTSIDE R.O.W.) y5 t I M PLANT LEGEND uueurs ED 0 e- 11-,,Mog�le,769F.2 M-;K- EA. CD E=J - — — ------ Em :m RUNE 1 . ...... V el < 1 " Q IUD1 - ols ,Q � JII 0 1 Q ',w 4� M " Fz N� m` I U �� "• _ e ": aa►�t•'�' �iP'•°.$•., SBU'.' �w< mmr.nrw..�.±mm'.ur,��+'.y^.�,1� p ��„A"�.e `• U �? C 2 - b - U W z LP 3 of 32 .rose,.,....,. NEW LOS ANGELES AVENUE DRIVE) REN6 3 P 7 b 0., 6a � S 4 rRFFr �y f � ao L im o� N:o 1 � \ ��� ®:BERG RANCH 1� c� brn � SE ` N A ALAN ING f'lAN(TIERRh RLJADA CARLSBERG RANCH K E v �D)� e rTENTATNE TRACTS a9i9 8 E914 • M00r?AR.K. CA C.T.F1�•1. ^.0 �,.AC.FNCMI �.ART*�rn:;in RIM z C/ �Asz T z / YR R, o -•i J T1 0000GO 74r —:o.s...e,,, ;11i .a J i 1 SC'TNCE. DRIVE i _ SSS G, o PLANTING PLAN(nERRA REJADA ROAD) CARLSBERG RANCH r E ca .SC CE EV S S TENTATIVE TRACTS 1973 & 4974 MOORPARK. CA. C N. 11"111A iti nSnIV P q 000 D r�2 N 1 — - SPRING ROAD 1 ' s� El l I gl U Q C$ z < Cc w m J _ � U U � z I! o I�� m acc 0 7 ill � w 1 -! 1 ,I S a I 0 x^451. 1 F IIiFFO, S U I g Us it xEr uar EP7 JOB �x =.w C' / G or SPAING ROAD .._... I m t i) S1-bPF �VJS I I ifs Neil STS I I { �l I L NA j Via« s i elEET LP -8 a2 APPENDIX F ASSESSMENT ROLL Appendix "17", the Assessment Roll, shows the assessment upon each lot or parcel (approximately 8,819 parcels) within this District and is on file in the Office of the City Clerk and County Assessor. The Ventura County Assessor's office no longer lists public utility easements on the Assessor's Roll. APPENDIX G RESOLUTIONS List of Resolutions A. Resolution No. 2000 -1688 [01105100]: Resolution of Intent B. Resolution No. 2000 -1711 [03/01/00]: Set Hearing for Zone 12 Ballots C Resolution No. 2000- [04/05/00] Approve Report / set 7/7 Hearing D Resolution No. 2000- : [05/03/00] Confirm Ballots for Zone 12 E Resolution No. 2000- : [06/07/00] Resolution Levying Assessments RESOLUTION NO. 2000 -1688 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA, INITIATING PROCEEDINGS FOR THE LEVYING OF ANNUAL, ASSESSMENTS FOR "MOORPARK LIGHTING MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. AD -84 -2" FOR THE FISCAL YEAR COMMENCING JULY 1, 2000, AND ENDING JUNE 30, 2001, AND ORDERING THE PREPARATION AND FILING OF A REPORT RELATING THERETO WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 ", being Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, the City Council of the City of Moorpark, by its Resolution No. 84 -88, adopted May 16, 1984, ordered the formation of the "Moorpark Lighting Maintenance Assessment District No. AD -84 -2" assessments a ; confirmed and 'levied the pproved thereunder for the fiscal year commencing July 1, 1984, and ending June 30, 1985; and has confirmed and levied assessments approved thereunder for each subsequent fiscal year; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Moorpark proposes to extend the improvements specified in said district for the fiscal yeatheommencinaping a d 2 0, and ending June 3.0, 2001, pursuant 1 Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code, being ofthelvState 1of California; and, WHEREAS, the City Council proposes to assume the maintenance Of improvements recently installed within Zone 12, said Zone having been created in 1997 and encompassing the properties within the Carlsberg Specific Plan. WHEREAS, the City Council also proposes to increase the assessment amounts for the-parcels within Zone 12 to fund the cost of said maintenance. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: Pursuant to Section 22585, et se Streets and Highways Code q•, of the 1972„ (the. "Landscaping and Lighting Act of ), it is hereby proposed to extend the annual assessments levied under "Moorpark Lighting and Landscaping Maintenance Assessment District No. AD -84 -2" of the City of Moorpark so as to. continue for the fiscal year commencing with July 1, 2000, and ending June 30,, 2001, to install, construct or maintain any authorized improvements under the Act, including but not limited to one or more of street lights, public lighting facilities, f � Resolution No. 2000 -1688 Page 2 landscaping, statuary, fountains, and other ornamental structures and facilities, and any facilities which are appurtenant to any of the aforementioned or which are necessary or convenient for the maintenance or servicing thereof, including irrigation, electric current and energy; and to provide incidental expenses in connection therewith. SECTION 2: The assessments proposed to be levied and collected shall be used for furnishing electric current or energy, or other illuminating agent for street lights, for the usual maintenance and operation of said street lights, for the maintenance of parkway and median landscaping and for other improvements as specified in Section 1 hereinabove. SECTION 3: To ensure that the costs and expenses of maintaining, operating and servicing the street and traffic safety lighting, and the improvements as specified hereinabove, are borne by the owners of the property to be benefited thereby, this Council resolves that the proposed landscape maintenance assessment district consist of all property within the City. SECTION 4: The distinctive designation for the assessment district to be continued pursuant to this resolution shall be "Moorpark Lighting and Landscaping Maintenance Assessment District No. AD- 84 -2." SECTION 5: The City Manager is directed to cause to be prepared an EngineerIs Report, in accordance with Article 4, Chapter 1, Part 2, Division 15, of said Streets and Highways Code; and that upon completion, the report shall be filed with the City Clerk, who shall then submit the same to the City Council for its consideration, pursuant to Section 22586 of said Streets and Highways Code. SECTION 6: The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this resolution and shall cause a certified resolution to be filed in the book of original resolutions. APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 5th day of January, 2000. atrick Hun r, Mayor ATTEST: &� b X00 - V"IIi APPENDIX H ZONE 12 ASSESSMENT CALCULATIONS Appendix 'H' Carlsberg Specific Plan 23- Mar -00 Landscape Assessment District Zone 12: Parkways & Medians Annual Assessment Calculation Cost Distribution Assessment Calcualation Commercial Lots institutional Lots Residential Lots Total Res. Property 534.00 lots Public Property 4.00 EDU No. of Lots & EDUs 538.00 total No. of Acres 98.79 6.63 Total Assessment 13814.79 8346.84 207797.12 229958.75 Assmnt per Lot or EDU 386.24 C Assessment per Acre 139.84 A 1,258.95 B Notes: A: $139.83933 rounded up to nearest $0.01.. B: $1,258.94923 rounded up to nearest $0.01. C: $386.2452133 rounded down to nearest $0.01 in order to avoid exceeding $229,961.49 limit. To To To Commercial Lots Institutional Lots Residential Lots Total Area % of Tot. Cost /Yr. $ % of Tot. Cost /Yr. $ % of Totdal Cost Nr. $ % of Tot. Cost Nr. $ Science Drive Medians 25 % 3121`.88 0% 0.00 75 % 9365.63 100 % 12487.50 Parkways 25% 8890.93 0 % 0.00 75 % 26672.79 100% 35563.73 Easements 0 % 0.00 0% 0.00 100 %, 43480.80 100% 43480.80 Tierra Rejada Road Medians n/a 0.00 n/a 0.00 n/a 0.00 n/a 0.00 Parkways 0% 0.00 0% 0.00 100% 5479.26 100% 5479.26 Easements 0 % 0.00 0% 0.00 100 %, 45573.84 100% 45573.84 Spring Raod Medians n/a 0.00 n/a 0.00 n/a 0.00 n/a 0.00 Parkways 0 %b 0.00 34 %e 7258.12 66% 14089.28 0% 21347.40 Easements 0 %« 0.00 0 % 0.00 100% 36033.98 0 %o 36033.98 Sub -Total 12012.81 7258.12 180695.59 199966.51 Plus Admin (15 %) 1801.92 1088.72 27104.34 29994.98 Total 6.0 % 13814.73 3.6% 8346.83' 90.4% 207799.92 229961.49 Assessment Calcualation Commercial Lots institutional Lots Residential Lots Total Res. Property 534.00 lots Public Property 4.00 EDU No. of Lots & EDUs 538.00 total No. of Acres 98.79 6.63 Total Assessment 13814.79 8346.84 207797.12 229958.75 Assmnt per Lot or EDU 386.24 C Assessment per Acre 139.84 A 1,258.95 B Notes: A: $139.83933 rounded up to nearest $0.01.. B: $1,258.94923 rounded up to nearest $0.01. C: $386.2452133 rounded down to nearest $0.01 in order to avoid exceeding $229,961.49 limit. EA, �4 NOTICE OF A PUBLIC HEARING PUBLIC NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Moorpark, California, on April 5, 2000, adopted Resolution No. 2000- fixing the date and time of a public hearing of the Moorpark City Council to be held on the 7th day of June, 2000, at the hour of 6:30 p.m. in the Council Chambers of the Moorpark City Hall, located at 799 Moorpark Avenue, Moorpark. The purpose of said public hearing is to consider making certain changes to, and to order the annual assessments for the "MOORPARK LIGHTING AND LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO.* AD -84 -2" for the fiscal year commencing on July 1, 2000, and ending on June 30, 2001, which would provide for the furnishing of power for and the usual maintenance and servicing of street fights and the landscape maintenance of public rights -of- w'ay within the said City. A' copy of Resolution No. 2000- , which is captioned as follows: "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR, AND DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO MAKE CERTAIN CHANGES AND TO ORDER THE ANNUAL ASSESSMENTS FOR THE "MOORPARK LIGHTING AND LANDSCAPING MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. AD -84 -2" FOR THE FISCAL -YEAR COMMENCING JULY 1, 2000, AND ENDING JUNE 30, 2001, PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972, AND FIXING THE TIME AND PLACE FOR A PUBLIC HEARING TO 'RECEIVE OBJECTIONS THERETO," is on file with the City Cierk and open to inspection. A summary of said Resolution is summarized as follows: 1. That the Engineer's Report prepared for Assessment District No. AD84 -2 for FY 2000/2001 is approved. 21. That said Engineer's Report includes information pertaining to a proposed increase to the assessment amounts for Zone 12, which is the area generally bounded by New Los Angeles Avenue, the Route 23 freeway, Tierra Rejada Road and Spring Road. 3 That said Engineer's Report may be further modified or changed, pursuant to applicable State law. 000®7:.x. A484- 01_notice Public Hearing Notice AD 84 -2 FY 2000/2001 Page 2 4. That except as noted in Section 3, the assessment amounts for FY 2000/2001 have not changed from the assessments levied in FY 1999/2000. 5. That it is the intention of the City Council a) to make certain changes to Assessment District No. AD 84- 2; b) to order the extension of the annual assessment for said district for FY 2000/2001; and, c) to levy and collect assessments for certain improvements described herein. Said district consists of a single city -wide zone to provide electric current or energy for public lighting within the City, to install, construct or maintain any authorized improvements under the Act, including but not limited to one or more of street lights, public lighting facilities, landscaping, statuary, fountains, and other ornamental structures and facilities, and any facilities which are appurtenant to any of the aforementioned or which are necessary or convenient for the maintenance or servicing thereof, including irrigation, electric current and energy; and to provide incidental expenses in connection therewith. Said district also includes assessments for the improvement and maintenance of the above described landscaping and related improvements in a number of zones of benefit. 6. That said lighting and landscaping maintenance assessment district includes the lighting and landscaping sites with all improvements located therein, described by and included within Assessment District No. AD 84 -2. 7. That the foregoing described work is to be located within Assessment District No. AD 84 -2, the boundary of which is described on a map on file in the City Clerk's office. 8. That said proposed maintenance and improvement is of benefit to, and, expense for which are chargeable upon, the district. 9. That a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the District and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable parcels within said District, is set forth 000 Public Hearing Notice AD 84 -2 FY 2000/2001 Page 3 in a copy of the aforementioned Engineer's Report on file with the City Clerk and open to inspection. 10. That the existing assessments, the proposed assessments and the proposed increases to the assessment amounts are set forth in Exhibit 'A' attached hereto and made a part hereof. 11. That a public hearing shall be held on June Council Chambers at the making certain changes assessments for Assessm 2000/2001. of the Moorpark -City Council 7, 2000, at 6:30 p.m. in the Moorpark City Hall to consider in, and to order the annual ent District No. AD84 -2 for FY 12. That this Notice of Public Hearing is given, in order that any persons having any objections to the work or extent of the assessment district may appear and show cause why said work should not be done or carried out or why said district should not be extended for the fiscal year commencing July 1, 2000, and ending June 30, 2001. Protests must be in writing and must be filed by the property owner with the City Clerk prior to the conclusion of the hearing. Protests may be mailed to the City Clerk, City of Moorpark, 799 Moorpark Avenue, Moorpark, CA 93021. Protest shall state all grounds for the objection and shall contain a description sufficient to identify the property being assessed. A majority protest will cause the assessment increase to be abandoned. For additional information about these proceedings or assessments contact Ken Gilbert at (805) 529 -6864, Ext. 255. 13. That all the work proposed shall be done in accordance with the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, being Part 2 of Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California. 14. That the City Clerk shall cause notice of said public hearing to be given by causing this summary of the Resolution of Intention to be published in the manner required by Part 2 of Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code and Section 54954.6 of the Government Code of the State of California. Public Hearing Notice AD 84 -2 FY 2000/2001 Page 4 15. That the City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this resolution. ATTEST: Deborah S Traffenstedt Patrick Hunter, Mayor THIS NOTICE IS GIVEN pursuant to the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, Section 22500 et. sec. of the Streets and Highway Code of the State of California, and is dated this 5th day of April, 2000. Deborah S. Traffenstedt City Clerk Public Hearing Notice Exhibit 'A' (Page 1 of 3) AD84-2 Summary of Assessments A. City Wide Assessments ($) -- ------- - - - -- -.1 ............... .......... . .... . . . ------- ............... ---. . .. . .......... .... . . .............. . ........... ............. . .......... . . . .......... . . Proposed . . .......... . ....... . ...................... -------- - - Use Existing FY 2000/01 Proposed Code Description . . ........ ............. . Assmnt Assmnt Increase ($) . 0 .. . . . . . . .......... . . . . . .... Residential Vacant ----- --- I - - -------------- - - - - ----------------- - - - - - - - - ----------------------- 5. 21 5.21 0.00 - Single Family Level 1 . . ............. ....... . . ....... 34.03 . . ....... . . . . . ....... . . 34.03 - - -000 2 ....................... Mobil Home .... . . . . .............. . . . . . .. ----------- . - -- ... ................... 0.00 . .............. . ........... . . .. . 0.00 . . . . . ................... .... . . ....................... I ....... . ..... 0.00; 3 . .. . . .................. Condo .... . . . . ............. . . . ............ ... . . . . . ............................ ........ . . . . ...................... ___.......--- 30.74 . ........... . ............ . . ...... 30.74 .... . .......... . ..................................... . .... . . 0.00 4 . . . . . . ..... . ....... . . . . . . . ...... Residential Inc. 2-4 units . . .... . . .......... .......... - . . .............. . . . ............... . . . . . ......................... . . 30.74 . ........ . ........ . . ........... 30.74 -------- 0.00 5 ---------------- - - 1 Apartments (5+) .......... . . ..... ................ ...... .. . . . .......... ----- - ---- ..... 25.52 . . ........... . ............. . . ........... . ..... 25.52 *"""""'-'--'-------------'-"* . . .......... . . 0.00 6 Single Family - Level 2 ............._._.__._.-------__ 28.82 ............ . . .......... . . .. ..... ..... . . 28.82 ..................... ... .. ....... ......... .. ................. .. .. 0.00 9 ... . ............. . _._._.....- Mobil Home & Trailer Park ......... --- ............. ...._._...._.- ___ --• . .................. .... 25.52 ...... . 25.52 0.00 10 ...... - - - -- ...... 'Commercial Vacant ................. . . . . .... . ....... . . . . . ....................... -------- . . . . .............. . 5.21 ....... . . ............ . .............. . . ...... 5.21 0.00 . . Retail Store, single . story---- _._._._.........._.. __._._______._._._._135:12__;. ......................... -- ............. . .......... ... . . . . .... . ..... ......... ...... . . . ...... -- - - ---------- 135.12 . . . . ............... 0.00 12 . . . ........... .... 1 Store Office Combination ........ . . ..... ...... 135.12 . . . . . . ....... . . . ......... . . ............. . . . 135.12 .... . ............. . ................ --- . ....... . ............ 0.00 15 !Shopping Centers (Neighborhood) ................... ........... ...... . . .................. . . . ............. . . 307.92 .......... - ......... . . .......... ................. 307.92 ....... . ............. . .... . ............. . ............. . .... 0.00 16 . ................. . . . ................... . .. 1Sho ping Centers (Regional) . P ................... . . . ................ ............. .. 652.69 . ............ . . .... ............ . ........... ....... 652.69 . - -------------------------- ---- - - - - ---- 0.00 17 . . . ....... .... . Office Building (one story) ..... ........ ..... .27 --••--.-__...._....____. .;...._...._._._.__._.- 114.27 _.______ 0.00 18 .. .. . ............ . Office Building (multi-story) .............. --- --_1.14 . -- ........... ... . 186.84 .......... . . . ........ ........... 186.84 .... . .............................. I . ........... . 0.00 19 .............. . . . ------ Retail Store (multi-story) .......... . ............ . . . .. . . . ....... . .. . ........ .. 186.84 . . .......... ............ . ........ .. ....... --- 186.84 - - - - --- ------- 0.001 21 _. . . ........................ Restaurants Cocktail lounges ----- - - - --------------- - - - - - - -------------------------- .......... .. .. ......... . . 155.97 ..... . ........... .......... I . . . ....... . ...... . 155.97 1 .................. .. - - - --------------- - --- 0.00 24 ..... . . ..... I ............. .. . Banks, Saving & Loans .......... . . . . . . . . . . . . . ................ . . . ........... . 114.27 . ......... - - -- -------- . . .......... . . . . . .......... . 114.27 . . . . . . . ......................... . ...................... . ............. . . 0.00 25 25 ............. . . . ....... . . . Service Stations ........... ------ . . .... .......... . . . ............................ -------- ......................... 135.12 ..... . ......... .........F.. 135.12 - - - -- - - - - ------- ---------- 0.00 26 Auto sales, repair, storage etc. . . . .......... 100.65 100.65 --------------- --- -------- 0 0 30 Industrial Land Vacant ....... . . ............. . . . . .................. --------- ........................... .......... . . . . - . . . . ............... . .. ............. . . 5.21 . .......... . ....... . . . . ..... . 5.21 . . . . . . .......... . ................ . ............. . . . .... 0.00 31 ............... . . . ... . . . . . 1 Light - Manufacturing ........ . . . .... . ....... ................ . 311.12 . . . .... 3 - 11 1 - 2 ..... .. .. ........ 0.00 32 - - ------------ . Warehousing ------ .._._._..........-•----- ._...... ...... 152.36 . . . .......... . .... - . . . . ....................... . 152.36 1 ................ . .... ......... ............................_. . 0.00 33 Industrial Condos, PUD's - .------- ._._...._.a.- . ............... . .. . . . ................. . . .. 155.97 ......... . ........... . . ......... . . .............. .. 155.97 . . . .. . ..................................................... 0.00 38 Mineral Processing . . ................... .......... . . . . . . ................ . . ............. . .... - .. .. . ................. . . .... .......... 114.27 . . ..... 114.27 0.00 - -4 4 Truck Crops . .......... . . . ---- . . . . . .................. . . .............. . ...... .... 5.5._:3 3 ..... . .......... . ......... . . . .... .......... = -- 55.33 ...... ................. . . ............................. 0.00 46 ............ . .. ...... . �Pasture (permanent) ................. ............. . ....... . . . . . . . . . . . - . . ....... . . . . . . . ....... . . . . ................. 55.33 - - - - - ------------ --------------- ------ -- - - 48 1 Poultry ..... ..... ........... - - - - ------ ............. . ................... _._:..._....... _._55._._33..._;.......- --- . 55.33 . .......0.00 .... . ......... . . ........ .... ......... 55.33 ............ ... . . ....... . ... 0.00 49 lFlowers, seed production ---------- . . . . . . ................. . ......... . . ....................... 55.33 . . ......... . ............ . ...... 55.33 . .... . .... . ..................................................... 0.00 51 ........ . .. ... . ...... Orchards ....... .. - -- ............. . . . . ....................... . . ................ . . . . .............. . 3_....;. 55.3 - .._...._.--- ._._...._.s .......... . .. 5.33 0.00 53 .................. . . . Field crops, dry .................. . . - ----- . . ............. .... . ... ....... 55.33 .... . .............. ........ .................... 55.33 1 0.00 54 of graze, dry . . . . . . .... ..... ....... . . . ......... .. . . .......... .................... 55.33 . . . .......... .... - .... . . .......... . 55.33 . . . . . . ....... . ................ . ........ 0.00 55 Feed lots ...... . . . . .. .......... ........... . ....... . . . . . . . . ... ........... . . . . ....... . 55.33 ............. . . ....... . . .......... . .. . ....... 55.33 ......... . ........... 0.00 57 Tree farms - - - - - ------------ - - - - ------------- - - - - - - -------------------------- ................... . . . I ............ ........ 55.33 . ......... . . ........... . . ......... ............. 55.33 0.00 61 - - - - - - - ------------- Theater .. . . . ............ - -- ... ................ ....... . ------------------------- - - - --------------- - - - --- --------------- ----- 138.74 ..... . ............ 138.74 ..................... .... . .... . ............................ 0.00 70 ....................... ....... - Institutional vacant land ...... . . ...... - - ..... . .......... . .... . 5.21 5.21 0.00 71 Churches, convent & rectory ............... . . . - - - -------- - ............. . . . . . . ............. . . . . . 5.21 ... . ......... . . ............. . I .......... . .... 5.2 1 . . . . . ................_... ._.........._..._0_.._.0.0..._, 78 ;Public Buildings ......... . . . ......... --------------------- - - - - - - ------- *'** ........ . ....... ................ . . .... . . . . ............... . . ............... .. 0.00 . ........ .. . ........ . ............. . .............. . . 0.00 . . .. . ............................................................ ... 0.00 80 Miscellaneous Vacant Land ... . . . ............... . . . .... ............... . . . . . .............................. . . - -- ......................... . . . ................ . 5.21 ............. .............. .. . ........... . . ............ 5.21 0.00 1 81 . ...... .... Utility Water Company ............ . .. . ................ .. . . .. . .............. . . .............. .._F_._......._.__.........._._ 0.00 -........_._.__.........._....>.--• 0.00 . . . . . . ............................... . .... . .... . .......... . .... . .. 0.00 .. ....... s.3._.___ . Petroleum & Gas . ....... . . . . . . ............ . . ....... - .... . . ............ . . .. ................. .. . . .... ...................... . . .. - - - -- ....................... . .............. .............. . . - .. . 58.95 . . ........ 58.95 --------------- 0.00 91 ... . . . . . . . . . . ............... Utility Edison ....... . . . ........................ ............. . . . 0.00 0.00 . . .......... . ............. . .... . . . . ............. . .......... . . . . 0.00 92 . ................ ...... Telephone ................. . . ............... ............. . . . .... 0.00 ....... . . .......... . . . ......... . .......... 0.00 0.00 93 ........... . . . . . ... SPRR ...... . . . ......... - - - - ------- - .............. . . . ............. ...... . . . . . . ......................... . . . . . . . . . ................... . ...................... ......... 0.00 . .......... . ......... -- ..... ..... ........................... 0.00 .......... .... . ........................ 0.00 1 - - -9 4 . :Community Condo Development . . ............ . . . ...... -- --- .... .. . .......... - .... ---- ............... ...... . = -- 0.00 . .... . . .......... . ............... . .. 0.00 ............................. 0.00 99 . ....... . . Exempt .. . . . .............. . . ................. . . . . -------------- - - - - --- ................... ......... . . ............. . .... ...... 0 . 00 . ........... . ............ . .. ....................... 0.00 - - - - ------- - - - - ---- . .. . .............. ................... 0.00 Public Hearing Notice Exhibit 'A' (Page 2 of 3) AD84-2 Summary of Assessments B. Zone of Benefit: In addition to the Citywide Assessments listed above by land use categories, the properties within each of the Zones listed below will be assessed a per lot Zone assessment for the improvement and maintenance of certain improvements determined to be of benefit to the properties within those Zones. - - --------------- . ............... . . . ........ ................ . . . ............ . . . . . ........................ ... . . . ................... . .... . . ....... . . . . ....... ........... . . ............. Proposedl ............ Existing FY 2000/01 Proposed Zone Description .. . . . .......... Assmnt Assmnt Increase ($) Tract 2851: Parkways @ Bambi, 129.37 129.37 0.00 Pecan and VCFCD Channel ............. . . . . . . . . . . ............................. . ... .. . . . . ............. . . . . ............ . . ... . . . . . ....... . . . . . . ....... . . . . ....... ............................. ....... . . . 2 :Tract 2865: Parkways east side �Peach Hill, north side Tierra south slopes & Christian & Spring. • Without Debris Basin Assessment 116.47 116.47 0.00 -------- - - - - - • With Debris Basin Assessment . ................ . . .. - ............. .......... . .... . . . ------------- .......... 145.64 .. . . .. . .. . ................... . . . . 145.64 ....... . . ......... . ................. ....... -------------------------------- 0.00 3 ;Tract 3032: Butter Creek entry & 11.62 11.62 0.00 . . .......... !Pepper mill -parkway .......... ............ . . . ........... . . .. . ............. . .... . . . . ....................... . . . . ........... . . .. .......... . . ................................... 4 Tract 3274: Parkways: north and 49.48 49.48 0.00 -- - - - - - -------- !south side of Williams Ranch Rd. ................... . . . ...... . . ........... . . ........ . ........... . .. ....... . . . . . ...... ----------- 5 !Tracts 3019 & 3525: Parkways: side of Tierra Rejada Road, west side of Peach Hill south side parkway & slupt! • Without Debris Basin Assessment 107.56 107.56 0.00 . ....... . ....... . . With Debris Basin Assessment 114.23 . . . . . . . ....... . . . . . . . . . . . ............................ .... 114.23 . . ........................... 0.00 ............. . . . ....... . ... 6 'Tract 3306: Parkway; west end 42.00 42.00 0.00 ...... . . . . . ........ 1 of Inglewood Avenue. .... . . ... ......... . . . . ........... . . .......... ----------------------- 7 Industrial Park NE of Gabbert Rd A 123.15 A 123.15 0.00 :and Los Angeles Avenue: Parkway sideAve. of L A .......... . . . . ...... . . . . . . . . .... . . . .......... ............. . .... .... . . ............ . .. . ............ . . ....... . . . . . . .......... - --------------- 8 West Village Buffer • City Area 15.40 15.40 0.00 • Home Acres Area .... . . . ........... . . .............. . . . . .............. . . . . . . . ....... . .... ....................... 37.69 . . . . . ........... ........ ... . .. 37.69 0.00 ------------- ------- 9 Condor Drive ......... . . . .......... . . . . .......... . . . . ...... - .. . . . . . ............. ............... . . . . . A 27.43] ...... A 27.43 . . ......... . ......... . . . ............. . . 0.00 . ................ ....... . ............. . . . ...... 10 'Mountain Meadows (PC-3) Residential • Without Debris Basin Assessment 76.55 76.55 • With Debris Basin Assessment 87.39 87.39 - - - --------------- Commercial - : .... . ....... A 615.71 ......................... .. A 615.71 . . .......... . .. .................... 0.00 - ...................... Public Hearing Notice Exhibit 'A' (Page 3 of 3) AD84-2 Summary of Assessments ............. ------ - - - - - - -------------------- --------- ....... . .... . ------ ....... . . ....... ................... Proposed' . . . . . . . ........... .............. Existing FY 2000/01 Proposed Zone !Description ........ . . . . . .......... ................ . . ' Assmnt Assmnt Increase($) . . . 11 Tract 4174 ............ ....... . . . ----- ..................... 337.78 .... . ...... . . ...................... .... ........... 337.78 . . .... . .... . . . . ....... . . . . . . .......... 0.00 .. . ............................... 12 Carlsberg SP Residential 0.00 386.24 386.24 Commercial 0.00 A 139.84 A 139.84 ........... Institutional .... . ------ - - - - ---- --------- 0.00 ------------- I . ...................... ... A.1,258.95 . . ........ . ........... . . ............. . . .................... A 1,258.95 . .. . . ............................ Notes: A) per acre assessment RESOLUTION NO. 2000- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR, AND DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO MAKE CERTAIN CHANGES AND TO ORDER THE ANNUAL ASSESSMENTS FOR THE " MOORPARK LIGHTING AND LANDSCAPING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. AD -84 -2" FOR THE FISCAL YEAR COMMENCING JULY 1, 2000, AND ENDING JUNE 30„ 2001, PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972, AND FIXING THE TIME AND PLACE FOR A PUBLIC HEARING TO RECEIVE OBJECTIONS THERETO. WHEREAS, by Resolution No. 2000 -1688, the City Council ordered the City Manager to cause to be prepared an Engineer's Report for Assessment District 84 -2 for FY 2000/2001, in accordance with Article 4, Chapter 1, Part 2, Division 15 of the California Streets and Highways Code; and WHEREAS, by Resolution No. 2000 -1711, the City Council approved an Excerpt from said Engineer's Report pertaining to Zone 12, and set May 3, 2000, as the date of a public hearing to consider an increase to the Zone 12 assessment; and WHEREAS, pursuant to the requirements of Resolution No. 2000 -1688, the completed draft Engineer's Report, including the above mentioned Excerpt for Zone 12, was filed with the City Clerk on the 24th day of March, 2000; and WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed said Engineer's Report and wishes to take certain actions relative to said report and to the levy of the assessments recommended therein. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. The Engineer's Report for " MOORPARK LIGHTING AND LANDSCAPING MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. AD -84 -2" for the fiscal year commencing July 1, 2000, and ending June 30, 2001, filed with the City Clerk on the 24th day of March 2000, is hereby approved. SECTION 2. That said Engineer's Report includes certain information pertaining to a proposed increase to the amount of the assessments for Zone 12, said assessment increase being contingent upon approval via mail ballots to be received by the City on May 3, 2000. Resolution No. 2000 - Page 2 SECTION 3. That the aforementioned Engineer's Report may be further modified or changed, pursuant to the provisions of Section 22630 of the Streets and Highways Code. SECTION 4. That, except as noted in Sections 2 of this Resolution, the assessment amounts proposed for FY 2000/2001 have not changed from the assessments levied in FY 1999/2000. SECTION 5. That the public interest and convenience require and it is the intention of the City Council of the City of Moorpark to make certain changes, to the "MOORPARK LIGHTING AND LANDSCAPING MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. AD -84 -2" and to order the extension of the annual assessments for said district for the fiscal year commencing July 1, 2000, and ending June 30, 2001, pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, and to levy and collect assessments for certain improvements as described herein, in accordance with said Act. Said "MOORPARK LIGHTING AND LANDSCAPING MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. AD -84 -2" consists of a single city -wide zone to provide electric current or energy for public lighting within the City, to install, construct or maintain any authorized improvements under the Act, including but not limited to one or more of street lights, public lighting facilities, landscaping, statuary, fountains, and other ornamental structures and facilities, and any facilities which are appurtenant to any of the aforementioned or which are necessary or convenient for the maintenance or servicing thereof, including irrigation, electric current and energy; and to provide incidental expenses in connection therewith. Said district also includes assessments for the improvement and maintenance of the above described landscaping and related improvements in a number of zones of benefit. SECTION 6. That said lighting and landscape maintenance assessment district shall specifically include the lighting and landscape sites with all improvements located therein, described by and heretofore included within "MOORPARK LIGHTING AND LANDSCAPING MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. AD- 84 -2." SECTION 7. That the foregoing described work is to be located within said Assessment District, the boundaries of which are more particularly described on maps included in the aforesaid Engineer's Report and entitled "Boundary Map, City of Moorpark Lighting and Landscaping Maintenance Assessment District No. AD- 84 -211, said report and maps being on file in the office of the City Clerk as of the 24th of March 2000. Resolution No. 2000 - Page 3 SECTION 8. That the proposed maintenance and improvement, in the opinion of the City Council, is of benefit to, and the City Council hereby makes the expense of said maintenance and improvements chargeable upon the district. SECTION 9. That a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the Assessment District and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within said District,. is set forth in a copy of the aforementioned Engineer's Report, a copy of which is on file with the City Clerk and open to inspection. SECTION 10. That the proposed assessment amounts are set forth in Exhibit 'A' attached hereto and made a part hereof. SECTION 11. That a public hearing of the Moorpark City Council shall be convened on the 7th day of June 2000, at the hour of 6:30 p. m., in the Council Chambers of the City Hall of said City, located at 799 Moorpark Avenue, Moorpark, for the purpose of receiving oral and written testimony regarding the proposed assessments for FY 2000 /2001. SECTION 12. That Notice of said pubic hearing is hereby given. All persons having any objections to the work or extent of the assessment district may appear and show cause why said work should not be done or carried out or why said district should not be extended for the fiscal year commencing July 1, 2000, and ending June 30, 2001. Protests must be in writing, and must be filed by the property owner with the City Clerk prior to the conclusion of the public hearing and such protest shall state all grounds of the objection and shall contain a, description sufficient to identify the property. A majority protest will cause the assessment increase to be abandoned. SECTION 13. All the work herein proposed shall be done in accordance with the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, being Part 2 of Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California. SECTION 14. The City Clerk shall cause a Notice of Public Hearing to be given by causing a summary of this Resolution to be published in the manner required by Part 2 of Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code and Section 54954.6 of the Government Code of the State of California. Resolution No. 2000 - Page 4 SECTION 15. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this resolution and shall cause a certified resolution to be filed in the book of original resolutions. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS ATTEST: day of , 2000. Patrick Hunter, Mayor Deborah S. Traffenstedt, City Clerk Attachments: Exhibit 1: Assessment Amounts `W Resolution No. 2000 - Exhibit 'A' (Page 1 of 2) AD 84 -2 Summary of Assessments A. City Wide Assessment Use Landscaping Lighting Total Code Description Assessment Assessment Assessment ($) 0 Residential Vacant 0.00 5.21 5.21 1 Single Family - Level 1 13.18 20.85 34.03 2 Mobil Home 0.00 0.00 0.00 3 Condo (per unit) 9.89 20.85 30.74 4 Residential Income 2-4 units (per unit) 9.89 20.85 30.74 5 Apartments (5 +) (per unit) 9.88 15.64 25.52 6 Single Family - Level 2 13.18 15.64 28.82 9 Mobil Home & Trailer Park (per space) 9.88 15.64 25.52 10 Commercial Vacant Land 0.00 5.21 5.21 11 Retail Store, single story 51.71 83.41 135.12 12 Store & Office Combination (per parcel) 51.71 83.41 135.12 15 Shopping Centers (Neighborhood) 172.38 135.54 307.92 16 Shopping Centers (Regional) 517.15 135.54 652.69 17 Office Building (one story) 51.71 62.56 114.27 18 Office Building (multi -story) (per parcel) 103.43 83.41 186.84 19 Retail Stores (multi -story) (per parcel) 103.43 83.41 186.84 21 Restaurants & cocktail lounges 51.71 104.26 155.97 24 Banks, Savings & Loans 51.71 62.56 114.27 25 Service Stations 51.71 83.41 135.12 26 Auto sales, repair, storage & rental 17.24 83.41 100.65 30 Industrial Land Vacant 0.00 5.21 5.21 31 Light Manufacturing 206.86 104.26 311.12 32 Warehousing 68.95 83.41 152.36 33 Industrial Condos, Coops, PUD's 51.71 104.26 155.97 38 Mineral Processing 51.71 62.56 114.27 44 Truck Crops 34.48 20.85 55.33 46 Pasture (permanent) 34.48 20.85 55.33 48 Poultry 34.48 20.85 55.33 49 Flowers, seed production 34.48 20.85 55.33 51 Orchards 34.48 20.85 55.33 53 Field crops, dry 34.48 20.85 55.33 54 Pastures of graze, dry 34.48 20.85 55.33 55 Feed lots 34.48 20.85 55.33 57 Tree farms 34.48 20.85 55.33 61 Theater 34.48 104.26 138.74 70 Institutional vacant land 0.00 5.21 5.21 71 Churches, convent & rectory 0.00 5.21 5.21 78 Public Bldgs., Fire Houses, Museums 0.00 0.00 0.00 80 Misc, Vacant land 0.00 5.21 5.21 81 Utility, Water Company 0.00 0.00 0.00 83 Petroleum & gas 17.24 41.71 58.95 91 Utility Edison 0.00 0.00 0.00 92 Telephone 0.00 0.00 0.00 93 Railroad Property 0.00 0.00 0.00 94 Undedicated Community Condo Development 0.00 0.00 0.00 99 Exempt 0.00 0.00 0.00 Resolution No. 2000 - Exhibit 'A' (2 of 2) AD 84 -2 Summary of Assessments B. Zones of Benerit. In addition to the Citywide assessments listed above by land use, the properties within each of the Zones listed below will be assessed a per lot Zone assessment for the maintenance of certain improvements determined to be of benefit to the properties within those zones. Annual Assessment Amount Without Added Amount per Year for Debris Basin Cleaning ($) Debris Basin Cleaning ($) Zone Description Total # Lots Per Lot ($) Total # Lots Per Lot 1 Tract 2851: 9,703 75 129.37 -- -- -- 2 Tract 2865: 72,484 622 116.47 1,400 48 29.17 3 Tract 3032: 3,079 265 11.62 -- -- -- 4 Tract 3274: 6,383 129 49.48 -- -- -- 5 Tracts 3019 & 3525: 23,340 217 107.56 500 75 6.67 6 Tract 3306 (Glenhaven): 924 22 42.00 -- -- 7 Industrial Park 11,200 A 90.94 A 123.15 -- -- -- (Gabbert & L. A. Ave) 8 Home Acres Buffer: • City Area: • Home Acres 9 Condor Dr. Industrial Park 10 Mt. Meadows PC-3: Residential Commercial 7,576 492 15.40 -- 7,576 201 37.69 -- 1,350 A 49.21 A a 27.43 -- 187,394 2,448 7,272 A 11.81 B 194,666 76.55 615.71 11 Tract 4174: 3,040 9 337.78 12 Carlsberg Specific Plan Residential 207,799.92 C 538 386.24 Commercial / Industrial 13,814.73 A 98.79 A 139.84 Institutional 8,346.83 A 6.63 A 1,258.95 29,961.48 7,252 669 10.84 n/a n/a n/a Notes: a: Acres — or per acre assessment b. 11.81 ac. x 8 EDU /ac. = 95 EDU... x $76.55 / EDU = $7,272.25... / 11.81 ac. = $615.71 / ac. c: Includes EDUs for Public Properties