Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAGENDA REPORT 2000 0503 CC REG ITEM 09A ITEM q• 14- . pmww� f ITV Or tiTOORPAPX.CAT,TrnRNTA (-*.^N,rwy"ci; Mrs-ling of CITY OF MOORPARK AGENDA REPORT py TO: The Honorable City Council FROM. Kenneth C. Gilbert, Director of Public Works DATE: April 21 , 2000 (Meeting of 5-3-00) SUBJECT: Consider Resolution No. 2000- Certifying the Tabulation of Mail Ballots Received Pertaining to the Proposed Increase to the Assessments for Zone 12 of Assessment District AD84-2 for Fiscal Year 2000/2001 DISCUSSION A. Background 1 . On January 5 Resolution No. 2000-1688 was adopted initiating the process for the levy of the assessments for Assessment District 84 -2 [AD84-2] for FY 2000/2001 . 2 . On March 1 Resolution No. 2000-1711 was adopted setting May 3 , 2000, as the date of the Public Hearing on the proposed increase to the Zone 12 assessment and the Mail Ballots relating thereto. 3 . On April 5 Resolution No. 2000-1721 was adopted approving the Engineer' s Report for AD84-2 for FY 00/01 and setting June 7 as the date of the public hearing to consider the levy of all of the AD84 -2 assessments for FY 00/01 . B. Public Hearing Notice This pubic hearing has been convened in order to receive input and tabulate mail ballots pertaining to the proposed increase to the amounts of the assessments for Zone 12 of Assessment District 84-2 . Attached as Exhibit 1 is a copy of the Public Hearing Notice mailed to the owner of each affected property, as listed in the last equalized secured property tax assessment roll of the County of Ventura . ad84_01_z12_ballot results 00V' "..- I AD84 -2 : Zone 12 Ballot Results April 21 , 2000 Page 2 C. Engineer' s Report Excerpt Attached to and made a part of each Public Hearing Notice (Exhibit 1) is a copy of the approved Engineer' s Report Excerpt pertaining to Zone 12 . That report excerpt fully explains the improvements to be maintained by the Zone 12 assessment, the amounts of the Zone 12 assessments and the methods used to calculate the assessments . D. Assessment Calculations Attached as Exhibit 2 are charts which show the manner in which the Zone 12 assessments were calculated. The total assessment amount for Zone 12 is $229, 961 .49 . Said assessment amount has been allocated to properties with approved ultimate land uses, based upon the Allocation Formula approved by the City Council on January 5 . Said Allocation Formula is set forth in the Engineer' s Report Excerpt (Exhibit 1) . E. Future Increases to Assessment Amount The total assessment amount may be increased in future years to cover increases to the cost of maintenance . The language in the Engineer' s Report Excerpt (see Exhibit 1) provides that any such increase may not exceed the increase to the Consumer Price Index (CPI) between the Base Year (FY 2000/2001) and the fiscal year of the then proposed assessment . Accordingly, any deferred increases may be applied in a future year should the need arise . F. Affected Properties Attached as Exhibit 3 is a key map and a list of the properties to be assessed. G. Public Property A portion of the costs allocated to residential properties is to be assessed upon public properties within Zone 12 . As set forth in the Engineer' s Report Excerpt (Exhibit 1) , an Equivalent Dwelling Unit [EDU] factor was assigned to each category of public property. The language in Exhibit 1 on this matter is summarized as follows : 1 . In that it has been determined that Water Utility and Flood Control property receive no benefit from the proposed improvements, said properties are to be exempt from the Zone 12 assessment . 000 ad84_01_z12_ballot results I AD84 -2 : Zone 12 Ballot Results April 21, 2000 Page 3 2 . Assessor parcels used for school purposes have been assigned and an EDU factor of one (1 ) EDU per parcel . 3 . Assessor parcels used for parks purposes have been assigned an EDU factor of one (1) EDU per parcel . The amount of the assessments upon public property within Zone 12 is shown on page 2 of Exhibit 4 and is summarized follows : • County Waterworks District No. 1 exempt • Calleguas Municipal Water District exempt • Ventura County Flood Control District exempt • Moorpark Unified School District $ 772 . 48 • City of Moorpark $ 772 .48 $1, 544 . 96 H. City Payment of MUSD Assessment Unlike the process which led to the approval of the Parks Assessment District , the Moorpark Unified School District (MUSD) has not been involved in the development and application of this assessment . Also, the amount of the assessment upon school property is relatively low. Accordingly, on March 1 the City Council approved the payment of the Zone 12 assessment for FY 2000/2001 to be levied upon MUSD property. Staff advised MUSD of the City' s intent to pay the FY2000/2001 assessment . Even though the FY00/01 assessment is to be paid by the City, consistent with the requirements of the law, the Moorpark Unified School District did receive Mail Ballots for the School property within Zone 12 , and have been given the opportunity to vote on the proposed assessment . I . Ballots As mentioned above, mail ballots pertaining to the proposed increase to the Zone 12 assessment were sent to the owners of all of the affected properties . A "generic" copy of the Ballot is attached as Exhibit 4 . J. Ballot Process As required by law and explained in the Public Hearing Notice, in order to be counted a ballot must be marked, signed and received by the City prior to the end of the public input portion of the May 3 Public Hearing . The owner of each affected property receives one vote for each dollar assessed ad84_01_z12_ballot results ©I,IZoft AD84-2 : Zone 12 Ballot Results April 21 , 2000 Page 4 to that property. Support of the assessment requires a majority vote from the ballots received. Failure to receive that majority vote will require that the City Council abandon the proposed assessment . K. Ballot Tabulation Attached as Exhibit 5 is a chart showing the tabulation of the ballots received as of 5 : 00 p.m. April 26 . If the final tabulation of the ballots at the close of the public input portion of the Public Hearing is different from the tabulation set forth in Exhibit 5 attached, a revised Exhibit 5 will be provided to the City Council at the close of the public hearing. L. Ballot Results The tabulation of the mail ballots set forth in Exhibit 5 indicates that % of the ballots received are in favor of the proposed increase to the Zone 12 assessment . Accordingly, the City Council has acquired jurisdiction to order the levy of the Zone 12 assessments described in the Ballots and related Public Hearing Notice and Engineer' s Report . M. Resolution Attached as Exhibit 6 is a Resolution certifying the results of the tabulation of the mail ballots and directing that the subject Zone 12 assessments appear in the final Engineer' s Report for Assessment District AD84-2 for FY 2000/2001 . The City Council will consider said report and the levy of all of the assessments for AD84-2 , at a public hearing on the matter which has been scheduled for June 7, 2000 . STAFF RECOMMENDATION Adopt Resolution No. 2000- List of Exhibits : Exhibit 1 : Public Hearing Notice / Engineer' s Report Excerpt Exhibit 2 : Zone 12 Assessment Calculations Exhibit 3 : Affected Properties Exhibit 4 : Ballot Exhibit 5 : Ballot Tabulation Exhibit 6 : Resolution ad84_01_z12_ballot results ! 1 0 0 pl ^ E xti,ti►-� 1 Public Hearing Notice CITY OF MOORPARK SPECIAL BENEFIT ASSESSMENT AD84-2, Zone 12 A. Notice of Public Hearing: A Public Hearing has been scheduled for Mai• 3, 2000, at 6:30 p.m. in the City Council Chambers, at City Hall, 799 Moorpark Avenue, Moorpark, CA, to consider approval of' an increase to the amount of the assessment forZ.one 12 of Assessment District 84-2. The purpose of this notice is a) to advise those concerned of the date and time Of the public hearing on the platter; b) to describe the purpose and intent of the proposed assessments; and, c) to explain the ballots which have been provided to the owners of affected properties. B. Background: In 1984, a Landscaping & Lighting Maintenance Assessment District (AD 84-2) was created to fund costs associated with street lighting and the maintenance of various landscaped areas within the City. In 1997 Zone 12 of that Assessment District %k as established, encompassing that area bounded on the east by the Route 2; frec%vav, on the west by Spring Road, on the north by New Los Angeles Avenue and the Arrovo Still) and on the south by Tierra Rejada Road. Since the formation of Zone 12. the amount of the assessment has remained at zero. The construction of landscape improvements kvithin that area has been completed and the City will be considering the possible acceptance and maintenance of certain specific portions of those landscape improvements. C. Reason for Assessment: The purpose for Zone 12 assessment is to fund City costs for the maintenance of certain specified landscaped areas within Zone 12. D. Engineer's Report Excerpt: Information pertaining to the Zone 12 assessment is set forth in an excerpt from the draft Engineer's Report for AD84-2 for FY 2000/2001, attached to this Public I learing Notice as Exhibit W. E. Scope of Improvements to be Maintained: The scope of the landscape improvements to be maintained by the City and tilnded by the Zone 12 assessment, is described in Boundary Maps set forth in the Fngineer's Report Fxcerpt attached as F.xhibit W. I Assessment Amounts: The alllotlllt Of the total annual assessment for Zone 12 of'ADS4-2 for FY 2000/2001, is 5229,961.49. The amount of the assessment for each affected property is shown on the Ballot provided to the owner of that property. In addition, the amount of the per acre or per lot assessments is set forth in the Engineer's Report i-,xcernt attached as Exhibit W. Public Hearing Notice Assessment District 84-2 - Zone 12 March 1, 2000 Page 2 C. flow the Assessment Was Calculated: To determine the amount of fllc assessments fur each property within Zone 12, the maintenance cost of specified elcrnlcnts of the improvements has been allocated to the various ultimate land uses within Zone 12. The costs allocated to each land use was then spread to cacti property, yielding a per lot assessment for residential property and a per acre assessment for other properties. More specific information pertaining to the Method of Assessment for Zone 12 is to be found in the Engineer's report Excerpt attached as Exhibit W. 11. Public Property: A portion of the costs allocated to residential properties will be assessed upon public properties. Fach category of public property has been assigned an Equivalent Dwelling Unit [L;DU] factor. The amount of the assessment for any given pubflcly-owned parcel is determine by multiplying the residential per lot asses<nlent h� the number of EDUs assigned to that parcel. Additional information on L:DI;s and assessments upoll public properties can be found in the Engineer's report Excerpt attached as L.x111b11 'A'. 1. Exempt Properties: It has been determined that Watel- Utility and Flood (control properties receive no benefit from the proposed improvements and are, therefore. except from the Zone 12 assessment. 11. Duration of the Assessment: The proposed assessment is for the period ho <gmning July t. 2000, and ending June 30, 2001. K. Method of Collection: The proposed assessment, if appro\cd, \',•ill appear on your property tax bill for FY 2000/2001. L. Future Increases: The total assessment amount may be increased in future years to cover increases to the cost of maintenance. In no instance may any increase exceed the increase to the Consumer Price Index (CPI) between the Base Year (FY 2000/2001) and the tiscal year of the assessment. Additional information pertaining to possible future increases to the amount of the Zone 12 assessment is set forth in the V.ngineer's Report Excerpt attached as Exhibit 'A'. M. Purpose of Ballot: Pursuant to the requirements of Proposition 218, the o\N ncrs of the properties affected must approve, by mailed ballot, any proposed increase to and assessment. Accordingly, the proposed increase of the 'Zone 12 assessment from zero to an amount necessary to fund the required maintenance, must be approved in this manner. N. Balloting Procedures: Rallots have been mailed to the owner of' each property to he assessed. Said Ballots were mailed to the owner of record 161- each affected property. as shown oil tile latest Assessor Roll for the County of Ventura. To express support for or objection to the proposed assessment, an owner of any affected property should mail or I,,,ice_ut Q ou 0000""',, Public I fearing !Notice Assessment District 84-2 - Zone 12 March I. 2000 1'agc 3 deliver the Ballet to the City. In order to count, Ballots must be marked, signed and received by the City prior to the end of the public input portion of' the Public I-Icaring idcnti led in Section A of this Notice. O. Ballot Results: The results of the tabulation of the Ballots received will be announced subsequent to the close of the Public Ifearing idcntiFied in Section A of this Notice. The owner of each affected property receives one vote fbr each dollar assessed to that property. Support of the assessment requires a majority vote from the ballots received. If that majority vote is received, the City Council will be asked to approve fhe Zone 12 assessment for FY 200012001. I f that majority is not received, the proposed assessment must be abandoned. Attest: Approved: _L J Deborah S. 1 raffenste'at. City Clerk Sic,-cn Kueny. City Manage- THIS lIS NOTICE IS GIVEN pursuant to the provisions of the landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, Section 22500 et. seq. of the Streets and 1-lighways Code of the State of* California, and Article XIIID of the California Constitution (Proposition 21 8). Date: mr�Yc h 1 Zoc� Deborah S. Traffcnstedt, Cit Jerk ( rhhn notxc 03-01.00 0 V V 0 Exhibit 'A' Engineer's Report for AD84-2 for FY 2000/2001 Excerpt Pertaining to Zone 12 Section 2 Definition of Tenns EDU I Equivalent Dwelling Unit]: For the purpose of determining the amount of the Zone 12 assessment to be levied upon public properties within Zone 12, each category of public property has been assigned an Equivalent Dwelling Unit [FDU] factor. Section 3 Method of Assessment Zone 12: Carlsberg SpeeiSic Plan: a. Assessinent Allocation: The maintenance costs for Zone 12 arc allocated to the approved ultimate land uses within Zone 12 as follo��s: Im► ro�emet t Comm./Ind. Institutional Residential Science Drive Parkways & Medians 25% 75 Science Drive Slope Easements 100% Ticrra Rcjada Rd Parkways & Slopcs 1001% Tierra Rejada Median 0% 0% 0% Spring Road Parkway 34% 66% Spring Road Slope Easements 100% Spring Road Median 0`:'0 0%, 0% b. Exempt Properties: It has been determined that 14'ater Utility and Plood Control properties receive no benefit from the proposed improvements. Accordingly, all such properties shall be exempt from the Zone 12 assessment. In addition, in that the portion of the total assessment allocated to the Institutional Properties is spread to only lots 3 and 4 of Tract 4974, the slope adjacent to Spring Road [AP#512-0-270-065 is exempt. c. Equivalent Dwelling Units IEDUI: A portion of the assessment allocated to Residential properties has been allocated to each public property within Zone 12, based upon the applicable number of EDUs for that public property. The FDUs assigned to various categories of public properties within Zone 12 are as 6rllrnvs: C;atep,or No. EDUs per Parcel • Schools: 1 • Parks: 1 • Water Utility Exempt • Flood Control Facility Exempt Edna ui ., 12 t, 10000" ; Exhibit 'A' (Page 2) Engineer's Report for AD84-2 - FY 2000/2001 Excerpt Pertaining to Zone 12 d. Annual Increase to Total Assessment Amount: I. Base Year: The Base Year Total Assessment Amount for Zone 12 is the amount stated in the Lngincer's Report For FY 2000.12001, said amount being $229,961.49. 2. Annual Increase: In years subsequent to FY 2000/2001, the Total Assessment amount for Zone 12 may be increased to cover maintenance cost increases. 3. Basis of Increase: The amount of any increase to the Total Assessment for Zone 12 shall be based upon the increase to the Consumer Price Index (CPI) for all Urban Consumers for the Los Angeles Metropolitan Area, for the calendar year ending the December prior to the Fiscal Year of the proposed assessment. 4. Deferred Action: Each year when the amount of the 'Total Assessment I'm- Zone 12 is determined, said amount may or may not be increased, a,� provided above, at the sole discretion of the Otv. 5. Assessment of Deferred Increase in Subsequent Years: Any increase to the Total Assessment for Zone 12 may include any increase deferred in any and all prior years. In such event, the appro\ed Total Assessment may nut exceed the Base Year Total Assessment Amount, adjusted to reflect the change in the CPI between the Base Year and the effective year of the proposed assessment. [Example: If the CPI increases 51/, Year 3, but the assessment fur Year 3 is increased by olfly 3%, the remaining 2% increase may be added to the assessment in any subsequent year.] 6. Increase Determined Invalidity: In the event any increase to the Total Assessment amount is held to be invalid or unconstitutional by any coup of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the Base Year Total Assessment for Zone 12. Section 4 Description of the Improvements to be Maintained 12. Zone 12: Carlsberg Specific Plan Maintenance costs associated with certain landscape improvements as described in the Boundary Map for Zone 12 included in Appendix "E". The cost for the maintenance of these improvements will be borne by all of the properties within Zone 12 as defined in said Boundary Maps and generally described as that area bounded by the Route 23 freeway, Tierra Rejada Read, Spring Road, the An-o%,o Simi and New Los Angeles avenue. 0U00fl—, Exhibit 'A' (Page 3) Engineer's Report for AD84-2 — FY 2000/2001 Excerpt Pertaining to 'Zone 12 Appendix "B" Landscape Formula Notes: 12. Zone 12: In addition to the above landscape charges, all of the properties within the Carlsberg Specific Plan are assessed an additional amount for the maintenance of certain parkways, medians and slope areas, as described in the Boundary Maps set forth in Appendix "E". The total assessment amount is allocated to ultimate land use categories in accordance with the chart set forth in Section 4 of this report. Based upon that allocation chart, the total assessment amount cited in Appendix 'D' of this report is spread to all of the properties within Zone 12. The amount of the assessment for each land use category is as follows: • Commercial / Industrial: S 139.84 - Acre • Institutional 51,258.95 Acre • Residential S 386.24 Lot or FDt; Appendix "D" Budget Estimate Zones of Benefit 12. Carlsbergo Specific Plan $229,961.49 Appendix "E" Boundary Maps Map of Zone 12 0000_, t. 08 66- Ilk if? go '0S F, u 0 0- gc " ,�0 .01 9c, 00�, ooS Sc I It. + el i 0.- t A -IN LIC re ct: u "CO a Lj tz !t L 4-10 O b 4-100 all 3nN3AY MONY so 0 0 N 0. X N '1 X v W r - — --.\ W 0. C 7 ��r __ _ �T�� /l ��..- -- - -- ovyw Sri.t t CO+...E❑-+: S I[ (( CCV4Cr+0uL snE 61 J-� LOT t LOT 4 LOT w / � 1, o 0 u N \ —`'f f / LOTS \ L - r f� ' per ' PARKWAYS I INS:DE R 6 V C �! I SCIENCE DRIVE MEDIAN LANDSCAPE EASEMEN �— -— - — -^—•J "-^`i'+� (OUTSIDE R.0.W.1 NOTE: ALL CORNER EN1 RY STATEMENTS ARE EXCLUDED Exhibit 2 (1 of 4) Alternate M Carlsberg Specific Plan 23-Feb-00 Landscape Assessment District Zone 12: Parkways and Medians Estimated Annual Assessment Calculation I.Maintenance Cost Calculation Tierra Science Drive Rejada Spring Total Description 4973 4974 Total Road Road Item Cost Median No. of trees 50 50 100 n/a 0 100 No.of Elec. Meters 1 1 2 n/a 2 No. of Water Meters 2' 0 0 0 n/a 0 0 1-1/2" 0 0 0 n/a 0 ' 0 No.of Controllers 2 2 n/a 2 No. of Valves 14 22 36 n/a 36 Sq Ft 20.195 21,430 41,625 0 41,625 Unit Cost/Mo. ($) 0.0250 0.0250 0.0250 Amt./Mo. $504.88 $535.75 $0 $0.00 Amt /Yr $6,058.50 $6,429.00 $12.487.50 $0 $0.00 $12,487.50 Parkway(R-O-W) No. of trees 110 220 330 50 160 540 No.of Elec. Meters 1 1 2 1 0 3 No.of Water Meters 2" 1 1 2 1 0 3 1-112" 1 0 1 0 0 1 No.of Controllers 2 2 2 No. of Valves 32 38 70 11 22 103 Sq Ft 62,250 110,550 172.800 19,430 75,700 267,930 Unit Cost/Mo. ($) 0.0235 0.0235 0.0235 0.0235 Amt /Mo $1,46288 S2,597.93 $456.61 $1,778.95 Amt /Yr. $17,554.50 S31,175.10 $48,729.60 $5,479.26 $21,347.40 Less Commercial(%) 75% Less Commercial($) ($13,165.88) ($13.165.88) Net Total $4,388.63 $31,175.10 $35.56373 $5,479.26 $21,347.40 $62,390.39 Parkway(Future Esmnt) No.of trees 50 161 211 40 $83.00 334 No.of Elec. Meters 2 2 4 1 1 6 No.of Water Meters 2" 0 0 0 0 1 1 1-1/2" 2 2 4 1 0 5 No.of Controllers 2 2 2 No. of Valves 38 19 57 20 26 103 Sq Ft 76,300 103,680 179.980 140.660 185.360 506.000 Unit Cost/Mo. ($) 0.0270 0.0270 0.0270 0.0270 Amt./Mo. $2.060.10 $2,799.36 $3.797.82 $5,004.72 Amt./Yr. $24,721.20 $33,592.32 $50,897.16 $45,573.84 $60,056.64 Less Institutional(%) 40% Less Institutional($) ($24,022.66) Less Commercial(%) 30% Less Commercial($) ($7,416.36) ($7,416.36) Net Total $17,304.64 $33,592.32 $43,480.80 $45.573.84 $36,033.98 $125,088.62 Total SF 394,405 160,090 261,060 816,658 Total Annual Maint.Cost Estimate $104,69790 $51,053.10 $57,381.38 $199,966.51 + 15% > $29,994.98 $229,961.49 file:carisberg LS_m - 00061,,; Exhibit 2 (2 of 4) Alternate M Carlsberg Specific Plan 23-Feb-00 Landscape Assessment District Zone 12: Parkways and Medians Estimated Annual Assessment Calculation II. Criteria &Assumptions Used to Develop per Square Foot Cost Estimate: Unit Cost Per Square Foot Per Month ($) Easement Parkways Outside Cost Category Medians w/R-O-W R-O-W Electrical: 0.000417 0.000167 0.000167 Water: 0.003333 0.003333 0.004167 General Maintenance: 0.016667 0.015833 0.018333 Special Maintenance: 0.000750 0.000667 0.000250 Sub-Total 0.0212 0.0200 0.0229 Plus 15% contingency (x1.15) 0.0243 0.0230 0.0264 Per Month Cost. . Say: 0.0250 0.0235 0.0270 Annual Cost Estimate (per s.f.) $0.30 $0.28 $0.32 OnvO-q Exibit 2 (3 of 4) Alternate M Carlsberg Specific Plan 24-Feb-00 Landscape Assessment District Zone 12: Parkways& Medians Estimated Annual Assessment Calculation Ill. Cost Distribution To To To Commercial Lots Institutional Lots Residential Lots Total Area %of Tot. Cost/Yr.5 %of Tot Cost Nr.$ %of Totciai Cost/Yr. $ %of Tot Cost/Yr.$ Science Drive Medians 25% 3121.88 0% 0.00 75% 9365.63 100% 12487.50 Parkways 25% 8890.93 0% 0.00 75% 26672.79 100% 35563.73 Easements 0% 0.00 0% 0.00 100% 43480.80 100% 43480.80 Tierra Rejada Road Medians n/a 0.00 n/a 0.00 n/a 0.00 n/a 0.00 Parkways 0% 0.00 0% 0.00 100% 5479.26 100% 5479.26 Easements 0% 0.00 0% 0.00 100% 45573.84 100% 45573.84 Spring Raod Medians n/a 0.00 n/a 0.00 n/a 0.00 n/a 0.00 Parkways 0% 0.00 34% 7258.12 66% 14089.28 0% 21347.40 Easements 0% 0.00 0% 0.00 100% 36033.98 0% 36033.98 Sub-Total 12012.81 7258.12 180695.59 199966.51 Plus Admin (15%) 1801.92 1088.72 27104.34 29994.98 Total 6.0% 13814.73 3.6% 8346.83 90.4% 207799.92 229961.49 IV. Assessment Calcualation Commercial Lots Institutional Lots Residential Lots Total Res. Property 534.00 lots Public Property 4.00 EDU No. of Lots & EDUs 538.00 total No. of Acres 98.79 6.63 Total Assessment 13814.73 8346.83 207799.92 229961.49 Assmnt per Lot or EDU 386.24 Assessment per Aacre 139.84 1,258.95 0000:1; Exhibit 2 (4 of 4) Alternate M 2/24/00 Zone 12 Assessment Summary Rate ($) Number of per lot ID Tract Lot Acres Lots EDU AP# owner Amt ($) or ac Commercial/ Industrial Property A 4973 1 17.83 512-0-260-015 Simi-Moorpark Freeway Prop. 2,493.34 139.84 B 4973 1 6.66 512-0-260-085 Simi-Moorpark Freeway Prop. 931.33 139.84 C 4973 1 4.51 512-0-260-105 Simi-Moorpark Freeway Prop. 630.68 139.84 D 4973 4 0.46 512-0-260-095 Cypress Land Company 64.33 139.84 E 4973 4 31.06 512-0-260-045 Cypress Land Company 4,343.41 139.84 F 4973 4 25.07 512-0-260-055 Simi-Moorpark Freeway Prop. 3,505.77 139.84 G 4973 4 1.52 512-0-260-125 Cypress Land Company 212.56 139.84 H 4973 2 11.68 512-0-260-025 Simi-Moorpark Freeway Prop. 1,633.32 139.84 Total Commercial/ Industrial 13,814.73 Institutional Property exempt 512-0-270-065 Conejo Freewy Properties 1 4974 3 2.79 512-0-270-035 ALS-Clare Bridge, Inc. 3,512.47 1258.95 J 4974 4 3.84 512-0-270-045 Three"D" Enterprises 4,834.37 1258.95 Total Institutional 8,346.83 Public Property K 1 500-0-350-505 MUSD 386.24 386.24 L 1 500-0-350-525 MUSD 386.24 386.24 M 4974 n/a 0 512-0-270-075 Ven. Co. Waterworks#1 - 386.24 N 4973 n/a 1 512-0-260-065 City of Moorprk 386.24 386.2, O 4973 n/a 1 512-0-260-075 City of Moorprk 386.24 386.24 P 4973 n/a 0 512-0-260-135 Calleguas Muni Water Dist - 386.24 Q 4973 n/a 0 512-0-260-165 VCFCD - 386.24 Sub-Total Public Property 1,544.96 Residential Lots R 4973 3 129 512-0-260-035 Western Pacific 49,824.96 386.24 S 4973 3 9 512-0-260-115 Western Pacific 3,476.16 386.24 T 4974 1 150 512-0-270-015 Lennar Moorpark, LLC 57,936.00 386.24 U 4974 1 10 512-0-270-085 Lennar Moorpark, LLC 3,862.40 386.24 V 4974 2 109 512-0-270-025 Richmond America 42,100.16 386.24 W 4974 5 127 512-0-270-055 Lennar Moorpark, LLC 49,052.48 386.24 534 4 Sub-Total Res. Lots 206,252.16 Total Lots + EDU: 538 Total Residential Assessment 207,797.12 Total 229,958.68 Maximum Assessment 229,961.49 00001 ti i t .DJ �ti AIOORPARK (CONEJO CREEK FREEWAY) FRf EWA � rr N.'CNWAY 23 ` Qj ` ♦ l r 'T lit- 4 4.4 �� �.. ^^ `Z'�Q•A� m , s04NCE° • O M ORnE Or IV 1 rr Mil + • • , ' .w�Wit• .s t .R p .;{� - �;� lit .s s R/NC «1 s�, � �~O1 � •,C h m h° ` �• J b� le O v �bq C` ti v Cb. ti� O. ' �O O� h O 3 (- 2aZ) A--512-0-260-015 B--512-0-260-085 C--512-0-260-105 S1M1-MOORPARK FREEWAY PROP. SIMI-MOORPARK FREEWAY PROP. SIMI-MOORPARK FREEWAY PROI Att: C.T. Development Att: C.T. Development Att: C. T. Development 2 N. Lake Avenue,#800 2 N. Lake Avenue,#800 2 N. Lake Avenue,#800 Pasadena,CA 9 1 1 0 1 Pasadena,CA 9 1 1 0 1 Pasadena,CA 91 101 D--512-0-260-095 E-512-0-260-045 F-512-0-260-055 CYPRESS LAND CO. CYPRESS LAND CO. SIMI-MOORPARK FREEWAY PROP 2203 E. Carson Street,#A-1 2203 L•.Carson Street. #A-I Att: Madge Patterson Long Beach,CA 90810 Long Beach, CA 90810 2 N. Lake Avenue, x800 Pasadena,CA 91101 G-512-0-260-125 H-512-0-260-025 1--512-0-270-035 CYPRESS LAND CO. SIMI-MOORPARK FREEWAY PROP. ALS-CLARE BRIDGE, INC. 2203 E. Carson Street,#A-1 Att: Madge Patterson Att: Sue Radcliffe Long Beach,CA 90810 2 N. Lake Avenue,#800 229 Peachtree Street Pasadena,CA 91 101 N.E. Atlanta,GA 30303 J--512-0-270-045 K--500-0-350-505 L--500-0-350-525 3-D ENTERPRISES MOORPARK UNIFIED SCHOOL DIST. MOORPARK UNIFIED SCHOOL DISI 15244 Magnolia Boulevard 30 Flory Avenue 30 Flory Avenue Sherman Oaks,CA 91403 Moorpark.CA 93021 Moorpark,CA 93021 M--512-0-270-075 N-5 12-0-260-065 0--512-0-260-075 Ventura County Waterworks District""I CITY O1- MOORPARK CITY OF MOORPARK 800 S. Victoria Avenue P.O. Box 701 P.O. Box 701 Ventura, CA 93009 Moorpark,CA 93021 Moorpark, CA 93021 P--512-0-260-135 Q-512-0-260-165 R--512-0-260-035 Calleguas Municipal Water District VCFCD WESTERN PACIFIC HOUSING P.O. Box E Att: Right-of-Way Agent Att: Tom Connelly Somis,CA 93066 800 S. Victoria Avenue 300 Continental Blvd., #390 Ventura,CA 93009 El Segundo,CA 90245 S--512-0-260-115 T--512-0-270-015 U-512-0-270-085 WESTERN PACIFIC HOUSING LENNAIZ MOORPARK, LLC LENNAR MOORPARK, LLC Att:Tom Connelly Att: Lcnnar}tomes of Califomia Att: Lennar Homes of California 300 Continental Blvd.,#390 24800 Chisanta Drive 24800 Chrisanta Drive El Segundo,CA 90245 Mission Viejo,CA 92691 Mission Viejo CA 92691 V--512-0-270-025 W--512-0-270-055[,EN2�AR h1OOltPARK, LLC RICHMOND AMERICAN HOMES 16845 Von Kalman,#100 Att: Lcnnar Homes of California Irvine,CA 92606 24800 Chrisanta Drive Mission Viejo CA 92691 Vtl`t�0 .�- CITY OF MOORPARK OFFICIAL BALLOT SPECIAL BENEFIT ASSESSMENT AD84-2, Zone 12 This is your official ballot to cast your vote on a proposed Special Benefit Assessment to be levied upon your property. Please mark the ballot with your vote and sign it before mailing or delivering. To count, this ballot must be received by the City before the end of the public input portion of the Public Hearing on the matter, scheduled for May 3, 2000, at 6:30 p.m., and to be held in the City of Moorpark City Council Chambers, 799 Moorpark Avenue. The ballot should be mailed or delivered to the City Clerk at the Moorpark City Hall, 799 Moorpark Avenue, Moorpark, California, 93021. For information pertaining to this assessment, please refer to the attached Public Hearing Notice dated March 1,2000. I :J Yes, I approve the proposed assessment for the maintenance of the landscape improvements within Zone 12 of Assessment District 84-2, as described in the Public Hearing Notice which accompanied this Ballot. No, I do not approve the proposed assessment. I hereby declare that I am the record owner, or authorized representative for the record owner, of the parcel(s) identified on this ballot. I further declare that I have received the Public Hearing Notice dated March 1, 2000, which explains the purpose of the proposed assessment, as well as other background information. Property Owner: Signature of Record Owner or Authorized Representative Listed Owner: Parcel Assessment Summary: Total Units : Per Unit Total Annual Acres/Lots Assessment Assessment Assessor's Parcel No_ or EDUsi Rate Amount [M: _) _ 0010011 Crlsbrg_ballot M `J Exhibit 5 04/14/00 AD84-2 Zone 12 Ballot Tabulation Ballot Tabulation Results Assessment [One vote per dollar of assessmentl ID AP# Owner Amt ($) In Favor Opposed Not Returned Commercial/Industrial Property A 512-0-260-015 Simi-Moorpark Freeway Prop. 2,493.35 2,493.35 B 512-0-260-085 Simi-Moorpark Freeway Prop. 931.33 931.33 C 512-0-260-105 Simi-Moorpark Freeway Prop. 630.68 630.68 D 512-0-260-095 Cypress Land Company 64.33 64.33 E 512-0-260-045 Cypress Land Company 4,343.43 4,343.43 F 512-0-260-055 Simi-Moorpark Freeway Prop. 3,505.79 3,505.79 G 512-0-260-125 Cypress Land Company 212.56 212.56 H 512-0-260-025 Simi-Moorpark Freeway Prop. 1,633.33 1,633.33 Total Commercial / Industrial 13,814.79 9,194.48 0.00 4,620.31 Institutional Property 66.6% 0.0% 33.4% 512-0-270-065 Conejo Freewy Properties 1 512-0-270-035 ALS-Clare Bridge, Inc. 3,512.47 3,512.47 J 512-0-270-045 Three "D" Enterprises 4,834.37 4,834.37 Total Institutional 8,346.84 0.00 0.00 8,346.84 Public Property 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% K 500-0-350-505 MUSD 386.24 386.24 L 500-0-350-525 MUSD 386.24 386.24 M 512-0-270-075 Ven. Co.Waterworks#1 0.00 N 512-0-260-065 City of Moorprk 386.24 386.24 O 512-0-260-075 City of Moorprk 386.24 386.24 P 512-0-260-135 Calleguas Muni Water Dist 0.00 Q 512-0-260-165 VCFCD - Sub-Total Public Property 1,544.96 772.48 0.00 772.48 Residential Lots 50.0% 0.0% 50.0% R 512-0-260-035 Western Pacific 49,824.96 49,824.96 S 512-0-260-115 Western Pacific 3,476.16 3,476.16 T 512-0-270-015 Lennar Moorpark, LLC 57,936.00 57,936.00 U 512-0-270-085 Lennar Moorpark, LLC 3,862.40 3,862.40 V 512-0-270-025 Richmond America 42,100.16 42,100.16 W 512-0-270-055 Lennar Moorpark, LLC 49,052.48 49,052.48 Sub-Total Res. Lots 206,252.16 110,850.88 0.00 95,401.28 Total Residential Assessment 207,797.12 111,623.36 0.00 96,173.76 53.7% 0.0% 46.3% Total 229,958.75 120,817.84 0.00 109,140.91 Maximum Assmnt. 229,961.49 Percent of Total Votes 52.5% 0.0% 47.5% Total Votes from Ballots Received 120,817.84 Percent of Votes from Ballots Received 100.0% 100.0% 0.0% XXXXXXXXX Exhibit 5 05/02/00 AD84-2 Zone 12 Ballot Tabulation Ballot Tabulation Results Assessment [One vote per dollar of assessment) ID AP# Owner Amt ($) In Favor Opposed Not Returned Commercial/ Industrial Property A 512-0-260-015 Simi-Moorpark Freeway 2,493.35 2,493.35 B 512-0-260-085 Simi-Moorpark Freeway 931.33 931.33 C 512-0-260-105 Simi-Moorpark Freeway 630.68 630.68 D 512-0-260-095 Cypress Land Company 64.33 64.33 E 512-0-260-045 Cypress Land Company 4,344.43 4,344.43 F 512-0-260-055 Simi-Moorpark Freeway 3,505.79 3,505.79 G 512-0-260-125 Cypress Land Company 212.56 212.56 H 512-0-260-025 Simi-Moorpark Freeway 1,633.33 1,633.33 Total Commercial/ Industrial 13,815.80 13,815.80 0.00 0.00 Institutional Property 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 512-0-270-065 Conejo Freewy Properties 1 512-0-270-035 ALS-Clare Bridge, Inc. 3,512.47 3,512.47 J 512-0-270-045 Three "D" Enterprises 4,834.37 4,834.37 Total Institutional 8,346.84 4,834.37 0.00 3,512.47 Public Property 57.9% 0.0% 42.1% K 500-0-350-505 MUSD 386.24 386.24 L 500-0-350-525 MUSD 386.24 386.24 M 512-0-270-075 Ven. Co. Waterworks#1 0.00 N 512-0-260-065 City of Moorprk 386.24 386.24 O 512-0-260-075 City of Moorprk 386.24 386.24 P 512-0-260-135 Calleguas Muni Water D) D.DD Q 512-0-260-165 VCFCD 0.00 Sub-Total Public Property 1,544.96 772.48 0.00 772.48 Residential Lots 50.0% 0.0% 500% R 512-0-260-035 Western Pacific 49,824.96 49,824.96 S 512-0-260-115 Western Pacific 3,476.16 3,476.16 T 512-0-270-015 Lennar Moorpark, LLC 57,936.00 57,936.00 U 512-0-270-085 Lennar Moorpark, LLC 3,862.40 3,862.40 V 512-0-270-025 Richmond America 42,100.16 42,100.16 W 512-0-270-055 Lennar Moorpark, LLC 49,052.48 49,052.48 Sub-Total Res. Lots 206,252.16 206,252.16 0.00 0.00 Total Residential Assessment 207,797.12 207,024.64 0.00 772.48 99.6% 0.0% 0.4% Total 229,959.76 225,674.81 0.00 4,284.95 Maximum Assmnt. 229,961.49 Percent of Total Votes 98.1% 0.0% 1.9% Total Votes from Ballots Received 225,674.81 Percent of Votes from Ballots Received 100.0% 100.0% 0.0% XXXXXXXXX RESOLUTION NO. 2000 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA, CERTIFYING THE TABULATION OF MAIL BALLOTS RECEIVED PERTAINING TO THE PROPOSED INCREASE TO THE ASSESSMENTS FOR ZONE 12 OF ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 84-2 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2000-2001 WHEREAS, by Resolution No. 2000-1688, adopted on January 5, 2000, the City Council ordered the preparation of an Engineer' s Report for "Moorpark Lighting and Landscaping Assessment District 84 -2" [herein DISTRICT] for Fiscal Year 2000-2001, in accordance with Section 22500 et . seq. of the Streets and Highways Code; and WHEREAS, said Resolution stated the intent of the City Council to make certain changes to the amount of the assessment for Zone 12 of the DISTRICT, said increases to be made in accordance with the requirements of Article XIII-D of the California Constitution (Proposition 218) ; and WHEREAS, by Resolution No. 2000-1711, adopted on March 1, 2000, the City Council approved an excerpt from the Engineer' s Report for the DISTRICT for FY 2000/2001, identifying certain improvements to be added to Zone 12 of the DISTRICT and determining the amount of the increase to the Zone 12 assessments required to maintain those improvements; and WHEREAS, by Resolution No. 2000-1721, adopted on April 5, 2000, the City Council approved the entire Engineer' s Report for the DISTRICT for Fiscal Year 2000/2001, which included the aforementioned excerpt for Zone 12 , said report being on file with the City Clerk; and WHEREAS, the aforesaid Resolution No. 2000-1711 (adopted March 1, 2000) set May 3 , 2000, at 6 :30 p.m. as the date and time of a public hearing to consider the proposed added improvements and increased assessments for Zone 12 ; and WHEREAS, said Resolution No. 2000-1711 further directed that a Public Hearing Notice, giving notice of said hearing, be mailed to the owner of each property affected by the proposed assessment increase, as listed in the last equalized secured property tax assessment roll of the County of Ventura; and, WHEREAS, said Resolution further directed that said Public Hearing Notice define and describe the improvements proposed to be added to Zone 12 , the total assessment proposed for Zone 12 , the amount of the assessment for the parcel owned by the addressee of the Hearing Notice, the duration of the assessment, the reason for the assessment, and the basis upon which the amount of the assessment was calculated; and, 0tt�;�".�': RESOLUTION NO. 2000 - Page 2 WHEREAS, said Resolution further directed that an assessment ballot be provided with the Public Hearing Notice to be mailed to the owner of each affected property, along with a summary of the procedures for marking and returning the ballot to the City to indicate support or opposition to the proposed assessment increase; and, WHEREAS, said summary of the balloting procedures also described the minimum requirements for the approval of the assessment increase and advised that a majority protest would result in the assessment not being imposed; and WHEREAS, said Public Hearing Notices, assessment information and ballots were mailed to the owners of all of the affected properties at least forty-five (45) days prior to the date of the public hearing; and WHEREAS, said Notice and mail ballots were provided to the owners of the affected properties in accordance with the requirements of Article XIII-D of the California Constitution; and WHEREAS, on May 3 , 2000, at the hour of 6 : 30 p.m. at the City of Moorpark, City Council Chambers, 799 Moorpark Avenue, Moorpark, California, 93021, the public hearing was duly and regularly held as noticed, and all persons interested and desiring to be heard were given an opportunity to speak and be heard, and all matters and things pertaining to the levy were fully heard and considered by this City Council, and all oral statements and all written protests or communications were duly considered; and WHEREAS, at the public hearing the Council tabulated the mail ballots and found that a majority protest as defined by Article XIII-D of the California Constitution did not exist , and this Council thereby acquired jurisdiction to order the levy and the confirmation of the diagram and assessment for Zone 12 of the DISTRICT, prepared by and made a part of the Engineer' s Report, to pay costs and expenses thereof . NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1 : A majority protest does not exist . The assessment ballots submitted, and not withdrawn, in opposition to the proposed assessment do not exceed the assessment ballots submitted, and not withdrawn, in favor, weighting those assessment ballots by the amount of the proposed assessment to be imposed upon the identified parcels for which each assessment ballot was submitted. 0()G6 ;.� RESOLUTION NO. 2000 - Page 3 SECTION 2 : The Engineer' s Report describing the assessments for the DISTRICT for FY 2000/2001, which is scheduled to be considered at a public hearing before the City Council on June 7, 2000, shall provide for the aforementioned assessments upon the properties within Zone 12 of the DISTRICT. SECTION 3 : The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this resolution and shall cause a certified resolution to be filed in the book of original resolutions . APPROVED AND ADOPTED this day of 2000 . ATTEST: Patrick Hunter, Mayor Deborah S . Traffenstedt , City Clerk +0(t0Or