The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutAGENDA REPORT 2000 0607 CC REG ITEM 09BCITY OF MOORPARK AGENDA REPORT CITY 0F N10, 0. _RPARN, CALIFORTNTA city Cgin..1n MvIeel .n 3L�i t✓ '% G`1 M TO: The Honorable City Council FROM: Kenneth C. Gilbert, Director of Public Works DATE: May 26, 2000 (Meeting of 6 -7 -00) SUBJECT: Consider Final Review and Changes to the Engineers Report for AD84 -2 and the Adoption of a Resolution Confirming the Assessment Amounts for Fiscal Year 2000/01 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This presents for approval a Resolution making certain changes to Assessment District AD84 -2 and confirming the assessments for Fiscal Year 2000/01. BACKGROUND A. Prior Actions A summary of past actions on this matter is as follows: Date Action Reso. # 01 -05 -00 Adopted Resolution of Intent to levy Assessments. 2000 -1688 01 -05 -00 Selected Assessment Engineer N/A 03 -01 -00 Approved Engineer's Report and set May 3 as the date 2000 -1711 of a Public Hearing regarding the proposed Zone 12 assessment increase 04 -05 -00 Approved Engineers report and set June 7 as the date 2000 -1721 of a public hearing to consider the levy of the FY2000 /2001 assessments 05 -03 -00 Confirmed Zone 12 ballot results 2000 -1734 ad84 - 01 . apry °° 0 -1a AD84 -2: Approval of Assessments May 26, 2000 Page 2 B. General Information C. Assessment District 84 -2 was formed in 1984 pursuant to the provisions of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972." This assessment district was established to allow for the funding of street lighting and parkway /median landscape maintenance and improvement expenses through the levying of assessments as provided for in the act. The City must annually act to levy the lighting and landscape maintenance assessments. Said assessments have been levied each year since the formation of the district. There are two types of assessments generally described as follows: • Citywide Assessments: assessments applied to all of the lots in the City; and • Zone Assessments: assessments applied to properties within certain zones of benefit to fund maintenance and /or improvements which benefit those properties. Citywide Assessments There are two types of expenses funded by two distinct Citywide assessments: street lighting costs and certain parkway and median landscape maintenance costs. 1. Street lighting costs are distributed to all of the properties within the City by means of a formula designed to spread said costs on the basis of benefit. The benefit spread formula identifies a number of factors (including lighting intensity, lighting security, people use, etc.) which are associated with benefits derived, and then weighs those factors by land use as a means to determining benefits derived. 2. Citywide landscape maintenance costs are spread via a People Use formula in which twenty -five percent (25 %) of the total Citywide landscape maintenance costs is allocated to non- residential properties and the remaining seventy -five percent (75 %) is allocated and spread to residential properties. These allocated costs are spread to both non- residential and residential properties by a "people -use" benefit formula based on the land use of each parcel being assessed. ad84- 01.apry AD84 -2: Approval of Assessments May 26, 2000 Page 3 D. Zone Assessments Landscape maintenance costs for each Zone of Benefit are spread, according to certain formulas, to each lot within that Zone. Storm debris basin maintenance cost for certain Zones of Benefit, are spread evenly to selected lots within those Zones, deemed to derive benefit from such maintenance. In addition to these maintenance costs, certain Zones may receive an improvement assessment to fund approved improvements to be funded by the assessment for those zones. Details on the spread formula or methodology for each Zone of Benefit, is set forth in the Engineer's Report. DISCUSSION A. Approved Engineer's Report On April 5 the City Council approved the Engineer's Report for AD84 -2 for FY 2000/01. A copy of that report is attached as Exhibit 1. A summary of some of the information in that report is as follows: 1. Method and Rates of Assessment: Provides a description and explanation of the methods and formulas used to calculate and spread the total assessment amounts to all of the affected lots. 2. Description of Improvements: Provides a description of all of the improvements maintained by the District. 3. Zone 12 Assessment Calculations: Sets forth information describing how the Zone 12 assessments were calculated. 4. Assessment Amounts: Sets forth the assessment amount for various land uses. 5. Boundary Maps: Contains the "Boundary Map, City of Moorpark Lighting and Landscaping Maintenance Assessment District No. AD84 -211, which show the boundaries of the entire Assessment District as well as the boundaries of each Zone of Benefit. These maps, along with the Ventura County Assessor Maps pertaining to properties within the City of Moorpark, constitute the AD84 -2 Assessment District Boundary Maps. 6. Changes to Report: Certain changes to the Engineer's Report are recommended to be approved by the City Council prior to the adoption of the Resolution setting the assessments for FY 1999/00. Those changes have been incorporated into the copy of the Engineer's Report attached as Exhibit 1. A summary of the changes is discussed below. B. Recommended Changes to Engineer's Report As mentioned above, it is recommended that the City Council approve certain changes to the Engineer's Report approved on April 5. Those changes are listed in Exhibit 2. ad84- 01.apry O I AD84 -2: Approval of Assessments May 26, 2000 Page 4 C. Fund Balances Attached as Exhibit 3 are charts which summarize the projected fund balances for the District. As mentioned in the April 5 staff report, each year the final Engineer's Report could be amended to direct that an adjustment be made to the amounts actually levied. Said adjustment to the "levied" amount only, would not reduce the amount of the assessment and said assessment amounts would remain at that "unchanged" level for the next and successive years. Such adjustments could be made to lower the amount of a projected year -end balance for any given Fund, when and if it was determined that said projected year -end balance was excessive. As described in Exhibit 3, certain Funds are projected to have a positive year -end balance in June 2001. However, it is not recommended that any of the amounts levied be adjusted downward and, and that all projected year -end Fund balances be held as a contingency reserve for future unforeseen expenses. D. Summary of Proposed FY 2000/01 Assessments --_-._ .......... _._._.__._ ............. .__ ............. .. -- ............ - ................... ----.- ............ ..--------- .......... _._ ............. _ ... ----- Total ....... .......................... -__ ............... --._ .......... -- .......... -- ......... Without Basin Maint ............ ._._._._.__._......._.......... .......--.........._._ ... ---- .... _ ....... _ .... _ ............. _._._ ....... _._ .... _...._._.: With Basin Maint. Description Assmnt ($) - -._...............--- Number' .......... - ............. Amount: _:........_. Number' Amount ($) ............. -- .............. _- .............. --- .............. --.................... _ ............. -- ... ...._._...................._._. - :_._ ..................._._. (.� ! y........--- Cit wide Street �- 204 757.00 _ ...._.........._.__.........._. - 20.85 - ......... - ._.......... -- ........... - - - - --- - - " "- - - "- Ligh ting .........._._.__. ...... -.........----- ................ ---- ............. _._._.__ Ctywide. -- Landscaping - -._ .........:......._148,.._525... ............................. ... - - -- ._._._ .............. ,... -- ._..... ......... ... ...._._._._._._..........- - ._ _ - --13 ...7..8 _..`.........- --- - - - - -- . - ._......._._._.- _........_Sub.. -...__ Total .. 3.5-3..., 2 82.._ 00.... ..................... ...._._._..._._._._......._._._ .........._.__ ............ . 34.03 - ......... ...... ... ................._............. Zones......... --._ ................._-- ._......... ._................_._._._.._._. ..... _.__..__._..........___._......._.__............_.__.........._.__........._....__.__._..........._._.__._ .- __._.__._.-- .-- ._._._._._...` . ............... _.- ...._....... -- ._._........_... 1: Tract 2852 _ .. - - ._...._ ................ _ .... _._._._._.__._._._............... ......._._9.., 702.75 ............. -- ....... ........... 75 _. 129.37 _......... : _... 2. _._._Tract 2865 ._____.........._ ....____._..........._._....__? 3. ,._8.8.4.._-._16.- ._-- - ._.- ............._.. -...._._. 5 74 --- ............ - ._...._.__..._......._. 116.4 7 -- .........._.__._.......... - ........ _............ - ........... - ........ _._ ...... _ .................. _.................. 4 8 14 5.64 - ._......._.__._ ............... - - -- ._._....... ..._............._............. _3 _- ._._..._Tract __3032 ._0 3 2 -----._..:... ._......._.____._......._...._3 , 0 7 9.3 0 2 6 5 11.62 - -- 4: Tract 3274 ... - ._.........._.__..__......._._.__.-. _.........._.__._...._...._.... - ._............,..... ...-......----__.._._ 6,382.92; _._._... ......................_.----.......-----......._._.__..._..... 129' .._;.............--- 49.48 .........._ -- ---- _............. . -. - ---- --- ---------------- 5: _._......_ Tracts_.... 301.9.(. 302.5 ._...._.__.._._...._2.3..•.840. -- 00 -- ._._.- .........._....... -- ._._...._...._. - - -- -142 _ -- .......... -- .......... ....._. 107, 56 ........... ................. - -- _.._._ . ............ ............ _ 75 114.22 6: Tract 3306 _._._._ . ____924 00 _ 22 42.0.0 .........._ 7: L A @ Gabbert ......... -- .......... -- .......-.----._.......---.--- ._.......----- .- .......... - --- - 11 199.63; _ - ._._._ ............... -- - ._. _. _..............._....------ 90.94 A 123.15 _ .. _8........_._Bu Buffer e r.._._. [ C tYl_....._._._. - -- .- ................_.__7 , 5 7 6._._0.0._._ _.........._.. 4 9 2 -- .......... - ....... 15.4 0 -- .......... ................... ._.. ..---- ._._........... ....... _.. ..._._ ._..Buffer Home Acres..... -- 7, 5 7 6. 0 0_'_ - - -- _. _.......... 1.._....._.___._._. -- ....... 3 7. 6 9 ........... --.......... .... ..-- ---- ._._ ........... .. -._.:. - - - -= _ 9.: Condor Drive -- .__ ................__1,349.83: ,.3 4 9. 8 3....... ... ......................_._.__2_� 49.21 A . ......--- ._.......---- ...._._ 27.43 -- ............ - ............. _ 10: Mt Meadows S - ................__.__20.1, _._........... _..... .................... 918 .._60_.__._._.............._1, 779_...;.._... -._55...._. . 9.__._..... . __. - - ......._.__ Comm.:.__._ PropertY_...._.........._._._.__- ...._ ..................._.... - -- ._ ......._...................._11 _S 1 A ._._.__._.......76.. 615.7 7 ._._......_66- ........................:87.39 11 : Tract 417 4 _ .............. - .- ._......._......._._._ : -- _...._._......_.__ ............. --- ............ -- ._......... .. 3 , 0 4 0.... 0 2 9_.._ ._..........__3 3 7.7.8 ° .......... ........... .__._... - ---- -- ._._._._._... _ 12 : Residential - ._._......... - ._._....... •----._......._._.__._._ .. ..........._.- __............... -- ._ 207 797. l2 ._...................r_... _ -- ........_..... ** 538._.._......- - 3.86..,_24.... - ....... --- ....... - --......_ .................................._......._....-- Comm. / Indust. ___._............_._.__ .............. ___._......_._.-- ...... ......._ .__ .... ........ _..._.___- ._.__. .................... .........__13, 814..... 79......._. -- - ._ ._.........._._...- _-- ._....... --- ......... - ...... . __...........--- 139.84 _.... ......... . - ...... ._.................... _.- ._.__._............ ......... _ ......... -- I ns t i tut,i ona 1. - -. . ............ ._... - -- 8 _, 3 4.6 . ..8.4_...;...._..........._6 _98....79..._A_._ ............._ . 6 3 A ............- 1,258.95 .. _..._.... - .... - ._._.... - - - -- - - -- - - - - - -- _......._.____._.........._.To ta.....Zon..... _12__ _...._2.9.9...,._958_.75....._. -- ._.........,....... _ - _..._._........---._.........-- - - - ----- ........._ --.............. --- ............. ....... ---- ................ -- ._................. _ _.__._....._ Sub -total All Zones _ .......---_-....------._......._----_........._...-.---._._...........-- 580 391.97 .•---- ._.e._ ................- ---._.. ....................----._._..._....----- ........................... ......---- ._...._._.__....... - .......... - .............. - = -- ..._._._... ......._._._......._._.... .................... ._....... -- .- ....... - ............. _._ ..... _.... ... _ ... _ . ............-- .............. - -- - - - -- -- - -- Total_.'........ -- ...................... ..... ---- ................. g............... 933, 673.._.._97 ' -- ...................... -._. ___ ............. -- _._.__......... - ....... -- ........__._...._.... -- ............. __. -- - -- -- - - - - - -- ..... ............. ............ -- ........... - ............. ** Includes Public - .......... -- ............. --............ .................... ..........._......._......._. _ Property EDUs ad84 -01 . apry 000019 AD84 -2: Approval of Assessments May 26, 2000 Page 5 E. Assessments Unchanged Except for the increase to the Zone 12 (see Section G) , the Engineer's Report proposes no new or increased assessments for AD 84 -2 for FY 2000/2001. All other assessment amounts are the same as last year. F. Zones of Benefit 1. General: There are no new Zones of Benefit proposed to be added in FY 2000/2001. A list of all of the Zones of Benefit is as follows: Zone Description 1 Pecan Avenue [T -2851] 2 Steeple Hill Area [T -2865] 3 Butter Creek /Peppermill [T -3032] 4 Williams Ranch Rd [T -3274] 5 Pheasant Run Area [T -3019 & T- 3525] 6 Inglewood St. [T -3306] 7 Moorpark Business Park (L. A. Ave & Gabbert) 8 Home Acres Buffer 9 Moorpark Industrial Park (Condor Drive) 10 Mountain Meadows (PC -3) 11 Alyssas Ct. [T -4174] 12 Carlsberg Specific Plan 2. Zone Landscape Maintenance Assessment: The properties within each of the Zones of Benefit are assessed for the maintenance of certain designated landscaped areas deemed to be of benefit to the properties within that zone. 3. Storm Drain Debris Basin Maintenance: A portion of Zone 2, 5 and 10 are assessed for the maintenance of debris basins along the south boundary of the City. 4. Improvement Assessment: The lots within Zone 2 have in past years been assessed a $10 per lot improvement assessment for a future project to construct parkway landscaping on the north side of Tierra Rejada Road, east and west of Southhampton Road. It is proposed that this improvement assessment be assessed again in FY 2000/2001. With the FY 2000/2001 assessment, the total funds available in FY 2000/2001 for this construction project will be $39,672 [$34,672 + $5,000 appropriated for Project No. 80191. ad84- 01.apry 0 G 10 0 0 AD84 -2: Approval of Assessments May 26, 2000 Page 6 G. Zone 12: Carlsberg Specific Plan M1 1. The City Council has authorized staff to accept and maintain the improvements to be funded by the Zone 12 assessment [as described in the Engineer's Report (Exhibit 1)] upon completion of certain prerequisites as approved by the City Council and provided to the developer. 2. One of the prerequisites was the approval of the Zone 12 assessment via Mail Ballot, as required by Proposition 218. 3. The Resolution of Intent [Resolution No. 2000 - 16881, adopted January 5, 2000, stated the City Council's intent to increase the Zone 12 assessment from zero to an amount sufficient to fund the maintenance of the Zone 12 improvements. 4. On March 1, 2000, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2000 -1711 setting May 3, 2000, as the date of a public hearing to consider the proposed increase to the Zone 12 assessment. 5. On March 1 the City Council also took the following actions: a) approved an "excerpt" from the Engineer's Report describing the Zone 12 improvements and the assessments; b) approved the Public Hearing Notice for the May 3 public hearing, which defined and explained the improvements, the assessment amounts, the duration of the assessment, the reason for the assessment, and the basis upon which the assessment amounts were calculated; c) approved the form of the Mail Ballots sent to the owner of each of the affected properties. 6. The Mail Ballots received were tabulated and the results presented to the City Council at the public hearing on May 3. The ballots were in favor of the assessment. 7. On May 3, 2000, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2000 -1734 certifying the results of the Mail Ballots and directing that the final Engineer's Report for AD84 -2 for FY2000 /2001 include the Zone 12 assessments. Public Hearing The "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972" (Streets and Highways Code) requires a public hearing to be held prior to the annual levy of assessments for�the purpose of receiving input and to hear any protests to the proposed assessments. ad84- 01.apry 0 G 0 0 2 AD84 -2: Approval of Assessments May 26, 2000 Page 7 Consistent with past City practice public hearing notices were not mailed to the owner of each affected property. Two years ago it was determined that, since the amounts of the assessments were not being changed, the cost of mailed public hearing notices was not justified. Attached as Exhibit 4 is a copy of the Public Hearing Notice for AD84 -2. Said Notice was published and posted as required by law. Said Notice sets the date of the public hearing as June 7, 2000, which is the first City Council meeting in June, as required by law. The Public Hearing Notice cites the assessment amounts set forth in the Engineer's Report. The City Council may revise the final assessment amounts any time prior to the adoption of the Resolution in June setting the amount of the assessments, provided the assessments do not exceed the amounts cited in the Public Hearing Notice. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the City Council take the following actions: 1. Open the public hearing, receive testimony and close the public hearing. 2. Approve the changes to the Engineer's Report listed in Exhibit 2 of this report. 3. Adopt the attached Resolution No. 2000- (Exhibit 5) making certain changes to AD84 -2 and confirming the assessments for Fiscal Year 2000/01. List of Exhibits: Exhibit 1: Engineer's Report Exhibit 2: Summary of the recommended changes to the May 5, 1999, version of the Engineer's Report Exhibit 3: Fund Balance Summary Exhibit 4: Public Hearing Notice Exhibit 5: Resolution: Setting Assessment Amounts for FY 2000/01 ad84- 01.apry 0000:22 PRELIMINARY ENGINEER'S REPORT CITY OF MOORPARK LIGHTING MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. AD -84 -2 LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972 AND PROPOSITION 218 PREPARED BY: CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES, INC. 371 Van Ness Way, Suite 200 Torrance, CA 90501 March 2000 TABLE OF CONTENTS Section 1 Authority for Report Section 2 Definition of Terms Section 3 Method and Rates of Assessment Section 4 Description of Improvements to be Maintained Section 5 Assessment Roll Section 6 Estimate of Cost Appendix "A" Appendix "B" Appendix "C" Appendix "D" Appendix "E" Appendix "F" Appendix "G" Appendix "H" Street Lighting Formula - Table 1 Erosion and Flood Control Related Landscape Formula - Table 2 Assessment Summary - Table 3 Budget Estimate Boundary Map Assessment Roll Resolutions Zone 12 Assessment Calculations Page 1 1 1 06090 CITY OF MOORPARK Engineer's Report Lighting Maintenance Assessment District No. AD -84 -2 Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972 and Proposition 218 For Fiscal Year 2000 -2001 SECTION 1 AUTHORITY FOR REPORT This report is prepared pursuant to City Council Resolution No. 2000 -1688, adopted January 5, 2000, to extend this District for the fiscal year commencing July 1, 2000 and ending June 30, 2001 in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, "Landscaping Act of 1972 ", being Part 2 of Division 15 of the California Streets and Highways Code and Proposition 218 which allows existing assessment districts to continue as long as rates and methodology remain the same. The District will provide electrical energy for public lighting facilities and for operation and maintenance of public lighting within the city. In addition, the District will provide for installation and/or maintenance of erosion and flood control related public landscaping within the public right - of -way. . SECTION 2 DEFINITION OF TERMS Assessment Rate - The assessment rate is the number assigned to each land use category. The assessment rate for a Level 1 Single Family Residential lot (land use code 1) is 1 for lighting assessment and 4 for erosion and flood control related landscape assessment. Assessment rates for other parcels in other land use categories, including publicly owned parcels, a re proportioned to these basic rates. These assessment rates remain unchanged. Methodology - The methodology is the formula used to derive the assessment rates of each land use category. The methodology has not been changed in several years. EDU [Equivalent Dwelling Unit] - For the purpose of determining the amount of the Zone 12 assessment to be levied upon public properties within Zone 12, each category of public property has been assigned an Equivalent Dwelling Unit [EDU] factor. 3 000025 SECTION 3 METHOD AND RATES OF ASSESSMENT Except for the changes to the Zone 12 assessment described below, the methodology and assessment rates used for Assessment District No. AD -84 -2 have not changed for the past several years, and are based on how the facilities being maintained provide benefits as part of the system of streets which serve the City of Moorpark. Lighting The benefits of street lighting are for the convenience, safety and protection of people and the security or protection of property, property improvements and goods. The intensity or degree of illumination provided can have a bearing on both. The single family home - Level 1 has been selected as the base unit for the spread of assessments. By definition, the single family home - Level 1 is a single family home located on a street that has existing streetlights. An assessment rate of 1.00 has been assigned to the base unit, which is composed of benefit factors, which correspond to the following types of benefit. People Use - People related benefits 0.50 Security Benefit - Property protection 0.25 Intensity - Degree of illumination 0.25 Assessment Rate: 1.00 Parcels in other land use categories, including publicly owned parcels, were then rated by comparison with the basic unit. (See the following table.) People Use - People related benefits 1. Reduction in night accidents and attendant human misery. 2. Reduced vulnerability to criminal assault during hours of darkness. 3. Promotion of business operations during evening hours. 4. Increased safety on roads and highways. Security Benefit Property Protection 1. Reduction in vandalism and other criminal acts, and damage to improvements. 2. Reduction in burglaries. Intensity: Intensity or degree of illumination provided on streets varies with type of street, date of installation and the use of the property adjacent thereto. 4 0 G 0 0 1117- 6 Landscaping The landscaping element of the spread formula recognizes that all properties within the City benefit from the maintenance of the landscaping within public rights -of -way and easements. These benefits include improved safety resulting from a regular tree trimming program and improved street sweeping capabilities resulting from trimming trees which may otherwise interface with street sweeping operations. The method of spreading maintenance costs is based upon the assessment rates, and the assessment rates are determined by the "people use" attributed to each land use within the City. This method was chosen because the benefit received is directly proportionate to the number of people generated by each land use. Recognizing that residential land uses within the City derive a higher degree of benefit than non - residential land uses, the formula was subdivided into two main groups, with residential land uses contributing in 75% of the assessment and non - residential uses being assessed for the remaining 25 % of the maintenance costs. The single family home has been selected as the base unit for the spread of assessment. An assessment rate of 4 has been assigned by the base unit. Parcels in other land use categories, including publicly owned parcels, were rated by comparison with the basic unit. (See the following table.) The "people use" factors utilized in determining assessment rates and in the assessment district spread formula are shown in Appendix `B ". Zone 12: Carlsberg Specific Plan a. Assessment Allocation: The maintenance costs for Zone 12 are allocated to the approved ultimate land uses within Zone 12 as follows: b. Exempt Properties: It has been determined that Water Utility and Flood Control properties receive no benefit from the proposed improvements. Accordingly, all such properties shall be exempt from the Zone 12 assessment. In addition, in that the portion of the total assessment allocated to the Institutional Properties is spread to only lots 3 and 4 of Tract 4974, the slope adjacent to Spring Road [AP #512 -0- 270 -065 is exempt. 5 0 G 0 0 7 c. Equivalent Dwelling Units [EDIT]: A portion of the assessment allocated to Residential properties has been allocated to each public property within Zone 12, based upon the applicable number of EDUs for that public property. The EDUs assigned to various categories of public properties within Zone 12 are as follows: Category No. EDUs per Parcel • Schools: 1 • Parks: 1 • Water Utility Exempt • Flood Control Facility Exempt d. Annual Increase to Total Assessment Amount: 1. Base Year: The Base Year Total Assessment Amount for Zone 12 is the amount stated in the Engineer's Report for FY 2000/2001, said amount being $229,961.49. 2. Annual Increase: In years subsequent to FY 2000/2001, the Total Assessment amount for Zone 12 may be increased to cover maintenance cost increases. 3. Basis of Increase: The amount of any increase to the Total Assessment for Zone 12 shall be based upon the increase to the Consumer Price Index (CPI) for all Urban Consumers for the Los Angeles Metropolitan Area, for the calendar year ending the December prior to the Fiscal Year of the proposed assessment. 4. Deferred Action: Each year when the amount of the Total Assessment for Zone 12 is determined, said amount may or may not be increased, as provided above, at the sole discretion of the City. 5. Assessment of Deferred Increase in Subsequent Years: Any increase to the Total Assessment for Zone 12 may include any increase deferred in any and all prior years. In such event, the approved Total Assessment may not exceed the Base Year Total Assessment Amount, adjusted to reflect the change in the CPI between the Base Year and the effective year of the proposed assessment. [Example: If the CPI increases 5% Year 3, but the assessment for Year 3 is increased by only 3 %, the remaining 2% increase may be added to the assessment in any subsequent year.] 6. Increase Determined Invalidity: In the event any increase to the Total Assessment amount is held to be invalid or unconstitutional by any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the Base Year Total Assessment for Zone 12. SECTION 4 DESCRIPTION OF IMPROVEMENTS TO BE MAINTAINED This report covers the period of July 1, 2000 through June 30, 2001. An updated report is prepared each year to reflect updated annual costs and changes in parcelization. The improvements to be maintained in this District include all City -owned and Southern California Edison (S.C.E.) -owned streetlights as well as all medians and street trees within public rights -of -way within the boundaries of the city. 6 000 Lighting maintenance shall include, but is not limited to, energy costs, removal, repair, replacement or relocation of light standards, poles, bulbs, fixtures and all appurtenances. Servicing of S.C.E. owned lights as defined in Section 22538 of the Streets and Highways Code shall be furnished by the Southern California Edison Company or its successors, or this servicing shall be as authorized by the Public Utilities Commission, State of California. Maintenance of City -owned lighting improvements shall be furnished by the City. Landscape maintenance for erosion and flood control shall include, but is not limited to, watering, fertilizing, mowing, weed control, shrubbery, tree removal and pruning, removal and replacement of dead growth, maintenance of irrigation facilities and other necessary work. In addition, the cost to maintain improved areas within certain Zones of Benefit will be borne by owners of property within said zone. Those Zones of Benefit are generally described as follows: 1. Tract No. 2851: Maintenance costs associated with landscaping in the Ventura County Flood Control Easement and portions of the interior tract entry areas. The obligation upon these 75 lots is pursuant to a condition of development. 2. Tract No. 2865: Cost for maintenance of specific landscape areas and debris basins within the tract, including landscaping at Christian Barrett & Spring Roads; Tierra Rejada landscaping, and Peach Hill Road landscaping on east side between Christian Barrett and Tierra Rejada Roads, and the entry monument sign at Christian Barrett and Spring Road. Also, an additional assessment for the improvement of parkway landscaping on the north side of Tierra Rejada Road east and west of Southhampton Road. The obligation upon the lots within this tract is pursuant to a condition of development. 3. Tract No. 3032: Maintenance costs associated with landscaping an entry monument at Buttercreek Road and Los Angeles Avenue. This cost to be spread to the 265 lots within the tract. 4. Tract No. 3274: Maintenance costs associated with landscape areas along Williams Ranch Road parkway adjacent to Peach Hill drain channel and Edison entries within PC -3. This cost will be borne by the 129 lots within the tract. 5. Tract Nos. 3019 & 3525: Maintenance costs associated with debris basins and landscaping the Tierra Rejada Road slope and parkway areas and parkway on the west side of Peach Hill Road between Williams Ranch and Tierra Rejada Roads within Tract Nos. 3019 and 3525. The cost is to be spread to the 217 lots within the tracts. 6. Tract 3306: Cost for maintenance of landscape areas within Tract 3306 at the westerly terminus of Inglewood Street. The cost is to be spread to the 22 lots within the tract. 7 0 (1) ' 7. Los Angeles Avenue Parkway: Maintenance costs associated with landscaping the parkway on the north side of Los Angeles Avenue between Gabbert Road and Shasta Avenue will be borne by all industrial lots northerly of Los Angeles Avenue, southerly of Poindexter Avenue, easterly of Gabbert Road, and westerly of Shasta Avenue. 8. Home Acres Buffer Area: Maintenance costs associated with the buffer area at the west end of the West Ranch area, is to be split 50 -50 between the residential properties within the West ranch area and the area outside the City known as Home Acres. That portion of this Zone of Benefit with the City consists of the residential areas within Tract 4340, 4341, 4792 and a portion of tract 4342. This area is bounded on the north by the Arroyo Simi, on the east by Tierra Rejada Road and the Commercial property at the corner of Tierra Rejada Road and Mountain Trail Street, on the south by Tracts 4637, 4342 -5 and the City boundary and on the west by the City Boundary. 9. Condor Drive Industrial Park: Maintenance costs associated with the parkway located at the northwest corner of Los Angeles Avenue and Virginia Colony Place will be borne by the developed parcels within the Industrial park on Condor Drive (Tract 3492). 10. PC -3: Maintenance costs associated with landscaping and debris basins within this area will be borne by all properties within the Mountain Meadows Planned Community (PC -3). The landscaping to be maintained consists of the Peach Hill Wash Linear Park, the slope along the north side of the Peach Hill Wash and the downstream flood control facility located just east of Mountain Trail Street and certain parkways on Tierra Rejada Road. 11. Tract 4174: Maintenance costs associated with landscaping within this area will be borne by all properties within the tract. 12. Carlsberg Specific Plan: Maintenance costs associated with certain landscape improvements as described in the Boundary Map for Zone 12 included in Appendix "E ". The cost for the maintenance of these improvements will be borne by all of the properties within Zone 12 as defined in said Boundary Maps and generally described as that area bounded by the Route 23 freeway, Tierra Rejada Road, Spring Road, the Arroyo Simi and New Los Angeles Avenue. Due to the manner in which water and electrical meters were constructed, the utilities (water and electrical) for certain improvements maintained by the Zone 12 assessment are provided by the Property Owners Association / Homeowners Association (POA/HOA) for the adjacent property. Also, the utilities for certain other improvements maintained by one or more POA/HOA are provided by the Zone 12 assessment. A diagram illustrating this reciprocal arrangement is set forth in Appendix E (Boundary Maps) on Page 7.1. 8. Plans and specifications for the irrigation, landscaping and lighting of streets, parks and easements, and other authorized improvements within the City are on file in the Department of Public Works. The lighting locations and specifications for Edison -owned lights are on file with the Southern California Edison Company. Reference is hereby made to said plans and specifications for the exact location and nature of the landscape and lighting improvements. Said plans and specifications by reference are hereby made a part of this report. SECTION 5 ASSESSMENT ROLL All parcels of real property affected are listed on the "Assessment Roll ", Exhibit "A," which will be on file in City Hall with the City Clerk, and is made a part hereof by reference. These parcels are more particularly described in maps prepared in accordance with Section 327 of the Revenue and Taxation Code which are on file in the office of the Ventura County Assessor in the County Government Center Administration Building, 800 S. Victoria Avenue, Ventura, California and which are also made a part hereof by reference. SECTION 6 COST ESTIMATE The City staff recommendation for the District budget is shown in Appendix 'D" of this report. The costs attributed to landscaping and the costs attributed to lighting will be separately appointed, according to the formula, and added together to constitute the total assessment for each parcel. CONCLUSION In conclusion, it is our opinion that the assessments within Lighting Maintenance Assessment District No. AD -84 -2 are apportioned by a formula that fairly distributes the net cost in accordance with the benefits that are received. The assessment rates and methodology remain the same for the past several years. 9 0 01 () 0 Z1,211 ` CITY OF MOORP Lighting Maintenance Assessme t District No. AD -84 -2 Assessment Rates 10 () 6() 01 LIGHTING LANDSCAPE USE ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT CODE DESCRIPTION RATE RATE 0 RESIDENTIAL VACANT 0.25 0 1 SINGLE FAMILY, LEVEL 1 1 4 2 MOBILE HOME 0 0 3 CONDO 1 3 4 RESIDENTIAL INCOME, 2- 4 UNITS 1 3 5 APARTMENTS (5+ UNITS) 0.75 3 6 SINGLE FAMILY, LEVEL 2 0.75 4 9 MOBILE HOME & TRAILER PARKS 0.75 3 10 COMMERCIAL VACANT 0.25 0 11 RETAIL STORES, SINGLE STORY 4 3 12 STORE & OFFICE (COMBINATION) 4 3 15 SHOPPING CENTERS (NEIGHBORHOOD) 6.5 10 16 SHOPPING CENTERS (REGIONAL) 6.5 30 17 OFFICE BUILDING (I STORY) 3 3 18 OFFICE STORES (MULTI- STORY) 4 6 19 RETAIL STORES (MULTI- STORY) 4 6 21 RESTAURANTS & COCKTAIL LOUNGE 5 3 24 BANKS, SAVINGS & LOANS 3 3 25 SERVICE STATIONS 4 3 26 AUTO SALES, REPAIR 4 1 30 INDUSTRIAL VACANT LAND 0.25 0 31 LIGHT MANUFACTURING 5 12 32 WAREHOUSING 4 4 33 INDUSTRIAL CONDOS, CO- OPS,PUD'S 5 3 38 MINERAL PROCESSING 3 3 44 TRUCK CORPS 1 2 46 PASTURE (PERMANENT) 1 2 48 POULTRY 1 2 49 FLOWERS, SEED PRODUCTION 1 2 10 () 6() 01 11 00001 LIGHTING LANDSCAPE USE ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT CODE DESCRIPTION RATE RATE 51 ORCHARDS 1 2 53 FIELD CROPS, DRY 1 2 54 PASTURE OF GRAZE, DRY 1 2 55 FEED LOTS 1 2 57 TREE FARMS 1 2 61 THEATER 5 2 69 PARKS 0 0 70 INSTITUTIONAL VACANT LAND 0.25 0 71 CHURCHES, CONVENT, RECTORY 0.25 0 72 SCHOOLS 0 0 73 COLLEGES 0 0 78 PUBLIC BLDGS., FIREHOUSES, MUSEUMS, ETC. 0 0 79 FLOOD CONTROL 0 0 80 MISCELLANEOUS VACANT LAND 0.25 0 81 UTILITY WATER COMPANY 0 0 83 PETROLEUM & GAS 2 1 86 WATER RIGHTS, PUMPS 0 0 88 HIGHWAYS & STREETS 0 0 91 UTILITY EDISON 0 0 92 TELEPHONE 0 0 93 S.P.R.R. 0 0 94 UNDEDICATED COMMUNITY CONDO DEV. 0 0 95 STATE PROPERTY 0 0 96 COUNTY PROPERTY 0 0 97 CITY PROPERTY 0 0 99 EXEMPT 0 0 11 00001 APPENDICES 10G,0 APPENDIX A STREET LIGHTING FORMULA () G01 APPENDIX A CITY OF MOORPARK Lighting Maintenance Assessment District No. AD -84 -2 Table 1 Street Lighting Formula A -1 G () 03 ANNUAL USE ASSESSMENT LIGHTING CODE DESCRIPTION RATE ASSESSMENT 0 RESIDENTIAL VACANT _ 0.25 5.21 1 SINGLE FAMILY, LEVEL 1 1 20.85 2 MOBILE HOME 0 0.00 3 CONDO 1 20.85 4 RESIDENTIAL INCOME, 2 - 4 UNITS 1 20.85 5 APARTMENTS (5+ UNITS) 0.75 15.64 6 SINGLE FAMILY, LEVEL 2 0.75 15.64 9 MOBILE HOME & TRAILER PARKS 0.75 15.64 10 COMMERCIAL VACANT 0.25 5.21 11 RETAIL STORES, SINGLE STORY 4 83.41 12 STORE & OFFICE (COMBINATION) 4 83.41 15 SHOPPING CENTERS (NEIGHBORHOOD) 6.5 135.54 16 SHOPPING CENTERS (REGIONAL) 6.5 135.54 17 OFFICE BUILDING (1 STORY) 3 62.56 18 OFFICE STORES (MULTI- STORY) 4 83.41 19 RETAIL STORES (MULTI- STORY) 4 83.41 21 RESTAURANTS & COCKTAIL LOUNGE 5 104.26 24 BANKS, SAVINGS & LOANS 3 62.56 25 SERVICE STATIONS 4 83.41 26 AUTO SALES, REPAIR 4 83.41 30 INDUSTRIAL VACANT LAND 0.25 5.21 31 LIGHT MANUFACTURING 5 104.26 32 WAREHOUSING 4 83.41 33 INDUSTRIAL CONDOS, CO -OPS, PUD'S 5 104.26 38 MINERAL PROCESSING 3 62.56 A -1 G () 03 A-2 0 () 0 0- 3, 7 ANN-UAL USE ASSESSMENT LIGHTING CODE DESCRIPTION RATE ASSESSMENT 44 TRUCK CORPS 1 20.85 46 PASTURE (PERMANENT) 1 20.85 48 POULTRY 1 20.85 49 FLOWERS, SEED PRODUCTION 1 20.85 51 ORCHARDS 1 20.85 53 FIELD CROPS, DRY 1 20.85 54 PASTURE OF GRAZE, DRY 1 20.85 55 FEED LOTS 1 20.85 57 TREE FARMS 1 20.85 61 THEATER 5 104.26 69 PARKS 0 0.00 70 INSTITUTIONAL VACANT LAND 0.25 5.21 71 CHURCHES, CONVENT, RECTORY 0.25 5.21 72 SCHOOLS 0 0.00 73 COLLEGES 0 0.00 78 PUBLIC BLDGS., FIREHOUSES, MUSEUMS, ETC. 0 0.00 79 FLOOD CONTROL 0 0.00 80 MISCELLANEOUS VACANT LAND 0.25 5.21 81 UTILITY WATER COMPANY 0 0.00 83 PETROLEUM & GAS 2 41.71 86 WATER RIGHTS, PUMPS 0 0-,00 88 HIGHWAYS & STREETS 0 000 91 UTILITY EDISON 0 0.00 92 TELEPHONE 0 0.00 93 S.P.R.R. 0 0.00 94 UNDEDICATED COMMUNITY CONDO DEV. 0 0.00 95 STATE PROPERTY 0 0.00 96 COUNTY PROPERTY 0 0.00 97 CITY PROPERTY 0 0.00 99 EXEMPT 0 0.00 A-2 0 () 0 0- 3, 7 APPENDIX B LANDSCAPE FORMULA USE CODE APPENDIX B CITY OF MOORPARK Lighting Maintenance Assessment District No. AD -84 -2 Table 2 Landscape Maintenance Formula DESCRIPTION ASSESSMENT RATE ANNUAL LANDSCAPE ASSESSMENT 0 RESIDENTIAL VACANT 0 0.00 1 SINGLE FAMILY, LEVEL 1 4 13.18 2 MOBILE HOME 0 0.00 3 CONDO 3 9.89 4 RESIDENTIAL INCOME, 2 - 4 UNITS 3 9.89 5 APARTMENTS (5+ UNITS) 3 9.88 6 SINGLE FAMILY, LEVEL 2 4 13.18 9 MOBILE HOME & TRAILER PARKS 3 9.88 10 COMMERCIAL VACANT 0 0.00 11 RETAIL STORES, SINGLE STORY 3 51.71 12 STORE & OFFICE (COMBINATION) 3 51.71 15 SHOPPING CENTERS (NEIGHBORHOOD) 10 172.38 16 SHOPPING CENTERS (REGIONAL) 30 517.15 17 OFFICE BUILDING (l STORY) 3 51.71 18 OFFICE STORES (MULTI- STORY) 6 103.43 19 RETAIL STORES (MULTI - STORY) 6 103.43 21 RESTAURANTS & COCKTAIL LOUNGE 3 51.71 24 BANKS, SAVINGS & LOANS 3 51.71 25 SERVICE STATIONS 3 51.71 26 AUTO SALES, REPAIR 1 17.24 30 INDUSTRIAL VACANT LAND 0 0.00 31 LIGHT MANUFACTURING 12 206.86 32 WAREHOUSING 4 68.95 33 INDUSTRIAL CONDOS, CO -OPS, PUD'S 3 51.71 38 MINERAL PROCESSING 3 51.71 B -1 0G0 USE CODE 44 46 48 49 51 53 54 55 57 61 69 70 71 72 73 78 79 80 81 83 86 88 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 99 DESCRIPTION ASSESSMENT RATE ANNUAL LANDSCAPE ASSESSMENT TRUCK CORPS 2 34.48 PASTURE (PERMANENT) 2 34.48 POULTRY 2 34.48 FLOWERS, SEED PRODUCTION 2 34.48 ORCHARDS 2 34.48 FIELD CROPS, DRY 2 34.48 PASTURE OF GRAZE, DRY 2 34.48 FEED LOTS 2 34.48 TREE FARMS 2 34.48 THEATER 2 34.48 PARKS 0 0.00 INSTITUTIONAL VACANT LAND 0 0.00 CHURCHES, CONVENT, RECTORY 0 0.00 SCHOOLS 0 0.00 COLLEGES 0 0.00 PUBLIC BLDGS., FIREHOUSES, MUSEUMS, ETC. 0 0.00 FLOOD CONTROL 0 0.00 MISCELLANEOUS VACANT LAND 0 0.00 UTILITY WATER COMPANY 0 0.00 PETROLEUM & GAS 1 17.24 WATER RIGHTS, PUMPS 0 0.00 HIGHWAYS & STREETS 0 0.00 UTILITY EDISON 0 0.00 TELEPHONE 0 0.00 S.P.R.R. 0 0.00 UNDEDICATED COMMUNITY CONDO DEV. 0 0.00 STATE PROPERTY 0 0.00 COUNTY PROPERTY 0 0.00 CITY PROPERTY 0 0.00 EXEMPT 0 0.00 Im 0 co 0 0�� 0 Appendix "B" (Cont.) Notes: 1. In addition to the landscape charge on the previous table, 75 lots within Tract No. 2851 are assessed an additional landscape maintenance assessment for a portion of the Ventura County Flood Control Easement immediately north of Campus Park Dive, as well as portions of the parkway landscaping at the entrance to and within the interior of Tract 2851. The additional per lot assessment is $129.37. The obligation upon these lots is pursuant to a condition of development. 2. In addition to the landscape charge on the previous table, 622 lots within Tract 2865 are assessed an additional landscape maintenance assessment for the maintenance of specific landscape areas and debris basins within the tract. The landscaped areas include certain parkways, the Tierra Rejada Road slope and streetscape areas, and the monument sign within the tract. Also, an additional $10 assessment will be levied upon each lot to fund the future construction of parkway landscape improvements on the north side of Tierra Rejada Road east and west of Southhampton Road. The additional per lot assessment is $116.47. Forty- eight (48) lots are assessed an additional $29.17 per lot for the maintenance of the debris basins. The obligation upon these lots is pursuant to a condition of development. 3. In addition to the landscape charge on the previous table, 265 lots within Tract No. 3032 are assessed an additional landscape maintenance assessment for the maintenance of an entry monument at Butter Creek Road and Los Angeles Avenue and landscaping on the south side of Pepper Mill Street. The additional per lot assessment is $11.62. 4. In addition to the landscape charge on the previous table, 129 lots within Tract No. 3274 are assessed an additional landscape maintenance assessment for the maintenance of the landscaped barrier in Williams Ranch Road at the Edison power lines, and the parkway landscaping on both sides of Williams Ranch Road east and west of the Edison Easement. The additional per lot assessment is $49.48. The obligation upon these lots is pursuant to a condition of development. 5. In addition to the landscape charge on the previous table, 217 lots within Tract Nos. 3019 and 3525 are assessed an additional landscape maintenance assessment for the maintenance of the Tierra Rejada Road slope and parkways, including the entry statements at Pheasant Run Street, and the parkway on the west side of Peach Hill Road between Williams Ranch and Tierra Rejada Roads. The additional per lot assessment is $107.56. Seventy -five (75) lots are assessed fef an additional $6.67 per lot for the maintenance of debris basins. The obligation upon these lots is pursuant to a condition of development. 6. In addition to the landscape charge on the previous table, 22 lots within Tract No. 3306 are assessed an additional landscape maintenance assessment for the maintenance of landscape area at the westerly terminus of Inglewood Street. The additional per lot assessment is $42.00. The obligation upon these lots is pursuant to a condition of development. - B -3 0 () 1. 7. In addition to the landscape charge on the previous table, 90+ AC northerly of Los Angeles Avenue, southerly of Poindexter Avenue, and between Gabbert and Shasta Avenues are assessed an additional landscape maintenance assessment for the maintenance of the parkway on the north side of Los Angeles Avenue Parkway. The additional assessment amount is $123.15 per acre. 8. In addition to the landscape charge on the previous table, 492 residential units within Tracts 4340, 4341, 4792 and a portion of Tract 4342 are assessed an additional $15.40 for fifty percent (50 %) of the maintenance costs for the Home Acres Buffer area. The remaining fifty percent (50 %) of such costs are recovered via an assessment upon 201 lots in the Home Acres area, in the amount of $37.69 per lot. This is the total amount of the assessment on the lots within Home Acres. Said lots are not assessed for Citywide lighting or landscaping. 9. In addition to the landscape charge on the previous table, 49± AC within the Industrial Park on Condor Drive are assessed an additional landscape maintenance assessment for the maintenance of the parkway located at the southwest corner of Los Angeles Avenue and Virginia Colony Place. The additional assessment amount is $27.43 per acre. 10. In addition to the landscape charge on the previous table, 2448 residential lots and one commercial property within the Mountain Meadows Planned Community (PC -3) are assessed an additional landscape maintenance assessment for the maintenance of the landscaping within the Peach Hill Wash Linear Park, the slope along the north side of the Peach Hill Wash and the downstream flood control facility located just east of Mountain Trail Street and within certain parkways along Tierra Rejada Road. The additional per lot assessment for residential properties is $76.55, and the assessment upon the commercial property at the southwest corner of Mountain Trail Street and Tierra Rejada Road is $615.71 per acre [118.81 ac x 8EDU /ac. = 95 EDU >> x $76.55/EDU = $7,272.25 / 11.81 ac = $615.71]. Six hundred and sixty -nine (669) lots are assessed an additional $10.84 per lot for the maintenance of debris basins. The obligation upon these lots is pursuant to a condition of development. 11. In addition to the landscape charge on the previous table, 9 lots within Tract No. 4174 are assessed an additional landscape maintenance assessment for the maintenance of parkway landscaping within the tract. The additional per lot assessment is $337.78. 12. In addition to the above landscape charges, all of the properties within the Carlsberg Specific Plan are assessed an additional amount for the maintenance of certain parkways, medians and slope areas, as described in the Boundary Maps set forth in Appendix "E ". The total assessment amount is allocated to ultimate land use categories in accordance with the chart set forth in Section 4 of this report. Based upon that allocation chart, the total assessment amount cited in Appendix 'D' of this report is spread to all of the properties within Zone 12. The amount of the assessment for each land use category is as follows: Commercial / Industrial: 98.79 AC $ 139.84 /Acre • Institutional 6.63 AC $1,258.95 / Acre Residential 538 EDUs $ 386.24 / Lot or EDU B -4 O W01a 7. In addition to the landscape charge on the previous table, 90+ AC northerly of Los Angeles Avenue, southerly of Poindexter Avenue, and between Gabbert and Shasta Avenues are assessed an additional landscape maintenance assessment for the maintenance of the parkway on the north side of Los Angeles Avenue Parkway. The additional assessment amount is $123.15 per acre. 8. In addition to the landscape charge on the previous table, 492 residential units within Tracts 4340, 4341, 4792 and a portion of Tract 4342 are assessed an additional $15.40 for fifty percent (50 %) of the maintenance costs for the Home Acres Buffer area. The remaining fifty percent (50 %) of such costs are recovered via an assessment upon 201 lots in the Home Acres area, in the amount of $37.69 per lot. This is the total amount of the assessment on the lots within Home Acres. Said lots are not assessed for Citywide lighting or landscaping. 9. In addition to the landscape charge on the previous table, 49± AC within the Industrial Park on Condor Drive are assessed an additional landscape maintenance assessment for the maintenance of the parkway located at the southwest corner of Los Angeles Avenue and Virginia Colony Place. The additional assessment amount is $27.43 per acre. 10. In addition to the landscape charge on the previous table, 2448 residential lots and one commercial property within the Mountain Meadows Planned Community (PC -3) are assessed an additional landscape maintenance assessment for the maintenance of the landscaping within the Peach Hill Wash Linear Park, the slope along the north side of the Peach Hill Wash and the downstream flood control facility located just east of Mountain Trail Street and within certain parkways along Tierra Rejada Road. The additional per lot assessment for residential properties is $76.55, and the assessment upon the commercial property at the southwest corner of Mountain Trail Street and Tierra Rejada Road is $615.71 per acre [118.81 ac x 8EDU /ac. = 95 EDU >> x $76.55/EDU = $7,272.25 / 11.81 ac = $615.71]. Six hundred and sixty -nine (669) lots are assessed an additional $10.84 per lot for the maintenance of debris basins. The obligation upon these lots is pursuant to a condition of development. 11. In addition to the landscape charge on the previous table, 9 lots within Tract No. 4174 are assessed an additional landscape maintenance assessment for the maintenance of parkway landscaping within the tract. The additional per lot assessment is $337.78. 12. In addition to the above landscape charges, all of the properties within the Carlsberg Specific Plan are assessed an additional amount for the maintenance of certain parkways, medians and slope areas, as described in the Boundary Maps set forth in Appendix "E ". The total assessment amount is allocated to ultimate land use categories in accordance with the chart set forth in Section 4 of this report. Based upon that allocation chart, the total assessment amount cited in Appendix 'D' of this report is spread to all of the properties within Zone 12. Derivation of the assessment amounts for Zone 12 are shown in Appendix 'H' and summarized as follows: Commercial / Industrial: 98.79 AC $ 139.84 /Acre Institutional 6.63 AC $1,258.95 / Acre : Residential 538 EDUs $ 386.24 / Lot or EDU B -4 ()04.3 APPENDIX C ASSESSMENT SUMMARY 000 APPENDIX C I CITY OF MOORPARK Lighting Maintenance Assessment District No. AD -84 -2 Table 3 Assessment Summary C -1 4. ANNUAL ANNUAL TOTAL USE LANDSCAPE LIGHTING ANNUAL CODE DESCRIPTION ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT 0 RESIDENTIAL VACANT 0.00 5.21 5.21 1 SINGLE FAMILY, LEVEL 1 13.18 20.85 34.03 2 MOBILE HOME 0.00 0.00 0.00 3 CONDO 9.89 20.85 30.74 4 RESIDENTIAL INCOME, 2 - 4 UNITS 9.89 20.85 30.74 5 APARTMENTS (5+ UNITS) 9.88 15.64 25.52 6 SINGLE FAMILY, LEVEL 2 13.18 15.64 28.82 9 MOBILE HOME & TRAILER PARKS 9.88 15.64 25.52 10 COMMERCIAL VACANT 0.00 5.21 5.21 11 RETAIL STORES, SINGLE STORY 51.71 83.41 135.12 12 STORE & OFFICE (COMBINATION) 51.71 83.41 135.12 15 SHOPPING CENTERS (NEIGHBORHOOD) 172.38 135.54 307.92 16 SHOPPING CENTERS (REGIONAL) 517.15 135.54 652.69 17 OFFICE BUILDING (I STORY) 51.71 62.56 114.27 18 OFFICE STORES (MULTI- STORY) 103.43 83.41 186.84 19 RETAIL STORES (MULTI- STORY) 103.43 83.41 186.84 21 RESTAURANTS & COCKTAIL LOUNGE 51.71 104.26 155.97 24 BANKS, SAVINGS & LOANS 51.71 62.56 114.27 25 SERVICE STATIONS 51.71 83.41 135.12 26 AUTO SALES, REPAIR 17.24 83.41 100.65 30 INDUSTRIAL VACANT LAND 0.00 5.21 5.21 31 LIGHT MANUFACTURING 206.86 104.26 311.12 32 WAREHOUSING 68.95 83.41 152.36 33 INDUSTRIAL CONDOS, CO -OPS, PUD'S 51.71 104.26 155.97 38 MINERAL PROCESSING 51.71 62.56 114.27 C -1 4. C -2 �� 0 ANNUAL ANNUAL TOTAL USE LANDSCAPE LIGHTING ANNUAL CODE DESCRIPTION ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT 44 TRUCK CORPS 34.48 20.85 55.33 46 PASTURE (PERMANENT) 34.48 20.85 55.33 48 POULTRY 34.48 20.85 55.33 49 FLOWERS, SEED PRODUCTION 34.48 20.85 55.33 51 ORCHARDS 34.48 20.85 55.33 53 FIELD CROPS, DRY 34.48 20.85 55.33 54 PASTURE OF GRAZE, DRY 34.48 20.85 55.33 55 FEED LOTS 34.48 20.85 55.33 57 TREE FARMS 34.48 20.85 55.33 61 THEATER 34.48 104.26 138.74 69 PARKS 0.00 0.00 0.00 70 INSTITUTIONAL VACANT LAND 0.00 5.21 5.21 71 CHURCHES, CONVENT, RECTORY 0.00 5.21 5.21 72 SCHOOLS 0.00 0.00 0.00 73 COLLEGES 0.00 0.00 0.00 78 PUBLIC BUILDINGS, FIREHOUSES, 0.00 0.00 0.00 MUSEUMS, ETC. 79 FLOOD CONTROL 0.00 0.00 0.00 80 MISCELLANEOUS VACANT LAND 0.00 5.21 5.21 81 UTILITY WATER COMPANY 0.00 0.00 0.00 83 PETROLEUM & GAS 17.24 41.71 58.95 86 WATER RIGHTS, PUMPS 0.00 0.00 0.00 88 HIGHWAYS & STREETS 0.00 0.00 0.00 91 UTILITY EDISON 0.00 0.00 0.00 92 TELEPHONE 0.00 0.00 0.00 93 S.P.R.R. 0.00 0.00 0.00 94 UNDEDICATED COMMUN. CONDO DEV. 0.00 0.00 0.00 95 STATE PROPERTY 0.00 0.00 0.00 96 COUNTY PROPERTY 0.00 0.00 0.00 97 CITY PROPERTY 0.00 0.00 0.00 99 EXEMPT 0.00 0.00 0.00 C -2 �� 0 APPENDIX D BUDGET ESTIMATE 000,047 APPENDIX D CITY OF MOORPARK Lighting Maintenance Assessment District No. AD -84 -2 Budget Estimate FY 2000 -2001 ZONES OF BENEFIT 1. Tract No. 2851 Interior Parkway & Flood Control Channel 2. Tract No. 2865 Pacifica & Pardee: Landscape Debris Basins Improvements 3. Tract No. 3032 Buttercreek & Peppermill 4. Tract No. 3274 Williams Ranch Road 5. Tract no. 3019, 3025 Warmington: 6. Tract No. 3306 Glenhaven (Inglewood) 7. Los Angeles Avenue North Side Parkway 8. West Villaize Buffer Area 9. Condor Parkway 10. Peach Hill Wash: Landscape Debris Basins Landscape: Residential Landscape: Commercial Debris Basins 11. Tract No. 4174 Colmer 12. Carlsberg Specific Plan: Residential Commercial/Industrial Institutional SUBTOTAL: D -1 $9,702.75 $66,224.00 $1,400.16 $6,220.00 $3,079.30 $6,382.92 $23,400.00 $500.00 $924.00 $11.199.63 $15,152.00 $1,349.83 $187,394.40 $7,272.24 $7,251.96 $3.040.00 $207,797.12 $13,814.79 $8,346.84 $580,391.97 a BUDGET ESTIMATE FY 2000 -2001 Citywide Street Lighting Assessment Citywide Landscaping Assessment Sub -total Citywide Assessments Sub -total Zone Assessments Total Assessments $204,757.00 $148,525.00 $353,282.00 $580,391.97 $933,673.97 D -2 00004 APPENDIX E BOUNDARY MAP o �,� m 3 a] 1q] Gj lio E i L �O ❑(C7L; ❑L 7 •• -. 34 JS 36 37 43 Q 44 0 46 0® 4F 48 Q JA ,a 6 I f� ZOtIE 3 T 3032 ' ® ® ®� Parkway Maintained. by Zone Assessment r ., �; .;, wr Zone 5 Debris Basin Maintenance Detail 33 "RCP 27 wESTPO 1 a + 45' 2 CP 24 "RCP c° D. C 24 "RCP�ysvILLE cr. a Rsw 27 "RCP 12 "RCP Zoe L (o = T 330 fo - -- tJ') i U J K`N 0 Parkway Maintained by Zone Assessment- V f n� �W c r- J Z � w � J o i o � Z 0 GOA roll CP in L-L-L Cl MAUR N c-> LN. ,,�E�E [Aig V -RCE AVE. m -Al • 9?AVE. SWASTA L "itAOZ QC .J r Z W r)000 I cl NO 1 y` to It • • . VI o� O .� ;' orte'1 Io njti• .' �'4, DI •9Y6t4 �. ; �♦ • �O� ty r .n.r TI T Q /7 af8U91 ®• j1 ♦ 1, dO� 4J to >1 Q) mot r �r.� 1 MEMO OFi Amm"m a !" /i �o MEADOW CITY OF MOORPARK VENTURA COUNTY . (MAY GO EAST) —� i i �M 500f u N (D 0 �i (D N- O W En• w (D w N z O rt M (D � w N d (D rt w N 48 "RCP 39� "RCP \1 I .. 10 1" 500' l J 36 "RCP O 02 "RCF �C7 ^N wcDroo �• tr a � :1nkQ m rt H- m !D N N :j W O W tz :jw0 p N M N N� �W dv rt N CFTY OF MOORPARK VENTURA COUNTY Zotit . tt : -t R« 4474 Legend 1@199999 Parkway Maintained by Zone Assessment 117111111 +111111111 Possible Future Maintenance f4 14 L• 21 s.31' 13 /3 TRACT 12 12 12 3070 -1 I t x.•oz's"'x f0 13 SEE DETAIL A O d � / M2.2,�ff'M '• ' O 2f IOI!' 1 .a O a � O =o O �o DETAIL A' O NO SCALE M. "00'If•M O 135.13 °e CAMPUS BAMBi TRACT Vii% .3583-2 PARK TRACT f6 3583 -1 Q Z76AC 76 7 a 1 COURT 46 47 r7 i a WK 17. to W f 4.51Ac. 512-26 LOS Bk. 11 0 1 ."I'a � UO6 29. oa4� 9 �5 524C --16 -@ f 1. 6a4c. C) k d", Lof 4 16 J.684C. C') W 4 31-06A, P=d os-I Q Q 25.07 82.0oAc. & P.—W 7 Bk. BZ59Ac. P—d (D 11-2 72a4c. 507 IP 9 � V je7 -@ 512-27 5.59Ac, Trad 4973, M.R. Bk. lin 75.0.9A, uu U35 78A, 80.04& 4 P—d $ zo V = V W 2 57.J2Ac. -t1 fcl5 M664c. 507 5( Tract 4974, M.R. Bk. li Pa, 77ERRA pe NOTES: AP NO. ACRES 500-0-350-505 14.73 500-0-350-525 4.•26 T8—.99 0 G 0 0 (C 5 r--.M-z C-k 0 ri wafto MMAPARK FREEWAY f OPLN.SP.ACE RESIDENTIAL j. COMMERCIAL SITE COMMERCIAi. SITE CO LOT4 S -2 SITE OpcN SP, E -MMUNITY RESIDENTIAL 1. O RESIDENTIAL COMMUNIT Y COMMERCIAL SITE OPEN .S @ LOT 2. M ARK MIDDLE SCHOOL NOTE: ALL CORNER ENTRY STATEMENTS ARE EXCLUDED RESIDENTIAL COMMl-)Nir! SPAI PARKWAYS I INSIDE R.0 Q SCIENCE DRIVE MEDIAN LANDSCAPE EASEMEN (OUTSIDE R.O.W.) ti OPEN SPAC-- IAOORPARK, FkEEwAv v PARK SHE .. .. y J -U iPAgK MI DC +P M. LOT 3 L 4'' PARKWAYS/ INSIDE R.O.1 OSS I �' MEDIANS FRI LANDSCAPE EASEMENT` (OUTSIDE R.O.W.) CIO tA ` a- ti OPEN SPAC-- IAOORPARK, FkEEwAv v PARK SHE .. .. y J -U iPAgK MI DC +P M. LOT 3 L 4'' PARKWAYS/ INSIDE R.O.1 OSS I �' MEDIANS FRI LANDSCAPE EASEMENT` (OUTSIDE R.O.W.) tA OPEN S°.1i:E •� CO'+:IMERCIAL SITE i COMMERCIAL SITE V: � `t- / QQ� j'/ J ,J LOT LOT p`OS -J� '2 1 OS -2 V' / ? SIDEfTFG _ C NIMLINII'y SITE .i . 1 nT 9 ti OPEN SPAC-- IAOORPARK, FkEEwAv v PARK SHE .. .. y J -U iPAgK MI DC +P M. LOT 3 L 4'' PARKWAYS/ INSIDE R.O.1 OSS I �' MEDIANS FRI LANDSCAPE EASEMENT` (OUTSIDE R.O.W.) PLANT LEGEND IHEFS o (D. e CD o _T All EW 'A 1. 353 u > li mom DU of 3z MOM Ka 353 u > li mom DU of 3z (IS"' 0 , I t � uv m Cl) m " w t t III ZE N aaa a t.F31 z un> I Mll ME . . ....... SET LP -3 LV 4 VA-\ - ------------------------------ i F-I C�l III - os =10 /7 OA /HOLandscaping Maintained by City Utilities Paid by P I IA Landscaping Maintained by POI HOA Utilities Paid by City of Moolparik Tb lk I T ERRA REJAD,-, RCIAC S-j Z U) < C) << ao SHEEP 0 YD a c b � �r SCIENCE DRIVE 1 I PLAN III gG PLAN (TfERRA REJADA ROAD) CARLSBERG RANCH TENTATIVE TRACTS 4979 8 4974 • MOORPARK• CA. C. T. FINANCIAL, A GENERAL PARTNERSRIP CIIECM F.D___ Q__ 0__ 3800 ReN SVeeI•Su4e3II• Sena MonNa, C0. 9WO5 P� q - - - --o i 1 I l _� D R 0000"-,,J4 (:i!P I In p if EL if IC-92 L LOTS t 4 I z LL, cn mogu eIEET of 32 APPENDIX F ASSESSMENT ROLL Appendix "F ", the Assessment Roll, shows the assessment upon each lot or parcel (approximately 8,819 parcels) within this District and is on file in the Office of the City Clerk and County Assessor. The Ventura County Assessor's office no longer lists public utility easements on the Assessor's Roll. 0000 7' APPENDIX G RESOLUTIONS List of Resolutions A. Resolution No. 2000 -1688 [01105100]: Resolution of Intent B. Resolution No. 2000 -1711 [03/01/00]: Set Hearing for Zone 12 Ballots C. Resolution No. 2000 -1721 [04/05/00]: Approve Engineer's Report / Set Hearing [June 7] D. Resolution No. 2000 -1734 [05/03/00]: Confirm Zone 12 Ballots E. Resolution No. 2000- [06/`07/00]: Resolution Levying Assessments RESOLUTION NO. 2000 -1688 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA, INITIATING PROCEEDINGS FOR THE LEVYING OF ANNUAL ASSESSMENTS FOR "MOORPARK LIGHTING MAINTENANCE• ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. AD -84 -2" FOR THE FISCAL YEAR COMMENCING JULY 1, 2000, AND ENDING JUNE 30, 2001, AND ORDERING THE PREPARATION AND FILING OF A REPORT RELATING THERETO. WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of the "Landscaping an Lighting Act of 1972" being Division 15, Part 2 of the p Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, the City Council of the City of Moorpark, by its Resolution No. 84 -88, adopted May 16, 1984, ordered the formation of the "Moorpark Lighting Maintenance Assessment District No. AD -84 -2 assessments a ; confirmed and levied the Jul 1 pproved thereunder for the fiscal year commencing y , 1984, and ending June 30, 1985; and has confirmed and levied assessments approved thereunder for each subsequent fiscal year; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Moorpark proposes to extend the improvements specified in said district for the fiscal July 1, 2000, toathe commencing Landscap in and Lighting Act June 30, 2001, pursuant gys 1Code, 1rit1V l Part 2 of the Streets and 'Highways of California; and, of he State WHEREAS, the City Council proposes to assume the maintenance Of improvements recently installed within Zone 12, said Zone having been created in 1997 and encompassing the properties withi the Carlsberg Specific Plan. n WHEREAS, the City Council also proposes to increase the assessment amounts for the parcels within Zone 12 to fund the cost of said maintenance. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: Pursuant to Section 22585 Streets and Highways Code et seq., of the 1972 "), it is hereby the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of levied under y Proposed to extend the annual assessments Moorpark Lighting and Landscaping Maintenance Assessment District No. AD-84-21f continue for the fiscal year ar commencing the 1withfJuly 1, so as to ending June 30, 2001, to install construct y 2000, and authorized improvements under the Act, or maintain any to one or more of street lights, including but not limited public lighting facilities, 0"000,9 Resolution No. 2000 -1688 Page 2 landscaping, statuary, fountains, and other ornamental structures and facilities, and any facilities which are appurtenant to any of the aforementioned or which are necessary or convenient for the maintenance or servicing thereof, including irrigation, electric current and energy; and to provide incidental expenses in connection therewith. SECTION 2: The assessments proposed to be levied and collected shall be used for furnishing electric current or energy, or other illuminating agent for street lights, for the usual maintenance and operation of said street lights, for the maintenance of parkway and median landscaping and for other improvements as specified in Section 1 hereinabove. SECTION 3: To ensure that the costs and expenses of maintaining, operating and servicing the street and traffic safety lighting, and the improvements as specified hereinabove, are borne by the owners of the property to be benefited thereby, this Council resolves that the proposed landscape maintenance assessment district consist of all property within the City. SECTION 4: The distinctive designation for the assessment district to be continued pursuant to this resolution shall be "Moorpark Lighting and Landscaping Maintenance Assessment District No. AD- 84 -2." SECTION 5: The City Manager is directed to cause to be prepared an Engineer's Report, in accordance with Article 4, Chapter 1, Part 2, Division 15 "of said Streets and Highways Code; and that upon completion, the report shall be filed with the City Clerk, who shall then submit the same to the City Council for its consideration, pursuant to Section 22586 of said Streets and Highways Code. SECTION 6: The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this resolution and shall cause a certified resolution to be filed in the book of original resolutions. APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 5th day of January, 2000. ATTEST: �n L Resolution No. 2000-1688 Page 3 STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF VENTURA ss. CITY OF MOORPARK I, Deborah S. Traffenstedt, City Clerk of the 'City of Moorpark, California, do hereby certify under penalty of perjury that the foregoing Resolution No. 2000-168.8 was adopted by the City Council of the City of Moorpark at a meeting held on the 51h day of January, 2000, and that the same was adopted by the following vote: AYES: Councilmembers Harper, Rodgers, Wozniak and Mayor Hunter NOES: None ABSENT: Councilmember Evans ABSTAIN: None WITNESS my hand and the official seal of said City this 19th day of January, 2000. ,Deborah S. Traffenste'df, City Clerk (seal) 000O&J. RESOLUTION NO. 2000 -1711 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO MAKE CERTAIN CHANGES TO, AND TO ORDER THE LEVY OF ASSESSMENTS UPON THE PROPERTIES WITHIN, ZONE 12 OF THE "MOORPARK LIGHTING AND LANDSCAPING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 84 -2" FOR THE YEAR 2000 -2001, PRELIMINARILY APPROVING THE ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR ZONE 12 AND PROVIDING FOR NOTICE OF A PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER SAID REPORT AND PROPOSED ASSESSMENTS WHEREAS, by Resolution No. 2000 -1688, the City Council ordered the preparation of an Engineer's Report for "Moorpark Lighting and Landscaping Assessment District 84 -2" for Fiscal Year 2000 -2001, in accordance with Section 22500 et. seq. of the Streets and Highways Code; and WHEREAS, said Resolution stated the intent of the City Council to make certain changes to the amount of the assessment for Zone 12 of said District, said increases to be made in accordance with the requirements of Article XIII -D of the California Constitution (Proposition 218); and WHEREAS, an .excerpt from the Engineer's Report pertaining to Zone 12, was filed with the City Clerk on the 25 h day of February, 2000; and WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed said Engineer's Report excerpt and wishes to take certain actions relative to said report and to the levy of the assessments for Zone 12 recommend therein. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. The Engineer'\s Report excerpt pertaining to Zone 12 of the "MOORPARK LIGHTING AND LANDSCAPING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 84 -2" for Fiscal Year 2000 -2001, on file with the City Clerk, is hereby approved. SECTION 2. Said Engineer's Report excerpt shall be incorporated into the Engineer's Report for the entire District, which is to be considered by the City Council at a later date. SECTION 3. Said Engineer's Report excerpt may be furt,her modified or changed, pursuant to the provisions of Section 22630 of the Streets and Highways Code, provided, however, that the amounts of the assessments provided for therein may not be increased. Resolution No. 2000 -1711 Page 2 SECTION 4. It is the intent of the City Council to make certain changes to the amount of the assessment for Zone 12 of "MOORPARK LIGHTING AND LANDSCAPING MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. A.D -84 -2" for the fiscal year commencing July 1, 2000, and ending June 30, 2001, and to levy and collect said assessments within Zone 12 to install, construct or maintain any authorized improvements under the Act, including but not limited to one or more of street lights, public lighting facilities, landscaping, statuary, fountains, and other ornamental structures and` facilities, and any facilities which are appurtenant to any of the aforementioned or which are necessary or convenient for the maintenance or servicing thereof, including irrigation, electric current and energy; and to provide incidental expenses in connection therewith. SECTION 5. Zone 12 consists of the lots and parcels shown in the Boundary Maps included in the aforesaid Engineer's Report excerpt. SECTION 6. Reference is hereby made to the Engineer's Report excerpt for a full and detailed description of the improvements within Zone 12, the boundaries of Zone 12 and the proposed assessments upon the lots or parcels within Zone 12. SECTION 7. A public hearing shall be held before the City Council in the Council Chambers, located at 799 Moorpark Avenue, Moorpark, California 93021 on Wednesday, May 3, 2000, at 6:30 p.m. for the purpose of the City Council's determination whether the public interest, convenience and necessity require the improvements and the Zone 12 assessments required to fund the maintenance of said improvements. SECTION 8. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to cause Notice of the 'hearing ordered under Section 7 hereof to be given in accordance with law by mailing, postage prepaid, in the United States mail, and such Notice shall be deemed to have been given when so deposited in the mail. The mailed Notice shall be given to all property owners within the Zone 12 of the District by such mailing by name to those persons whose names and addresses appear on the last equalized secured property tax assessment roll of the County of Ventura. The Notice shall include, but not be limited to, the total amount of the Zone 12 assessment proposed to be levied for fiscal year 2000 -2001, the assessment proposed for the owner's particular parcel(s) and the duration thereof, the reason for the assessment and the basis upon which the amount of the assessment was calculated. Each Notice shall also contain an assessment ballot, a summary of the procedures applicable to the completion, return and tabulation of assessment ballots, and a statement that the existence of a majority protest will result in�the assessment not being imposed. Resolution No. 2000 -1711 Page 3 The Notice herein provided shall be mailed not less than forty - five (45) days before the date of the public hearing. SECTION 9. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this resolution and shall cause a certified resolution to be filed in the book of original resolutions. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 1St day of March 2000. ATTEST: Resolution No. 2000-1711 Page 4 STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF VENTURA ss. CITY OF MOORPARK I, Deborah S. Traffenstedt, City Clerk of the City of Moorpark, California, do hereby certify under penalty of perjury that the Resolution No. 2000-1711 was adopted by the City Council of the City of Moorpark at a meeting held on the 1st day of March 2000, and that the same was adopted by the following vote: AYES: Councilmembers Evans, Harper, Rodgers, Wozniak and Mayor Hunter NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None WITNESS my hand and the official seal of said City this 18th day of May 2000. Deborah S. Traffenstecft—, City ClerR (seal) 0 G 0 RESOLUTION NO. 2000 -1721 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR, AND DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO MAKE CERTAIN CHANGES AND TO ORDER THE ANNUAL ASSESSMENTS FOR THE MOORPARK LIGHTING AND LANDSCAPING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. AD -84 -2" FOR THE FISCAL YEAR COMMENCING JULY 1, 2000, AND ENDING JUNE 30, 2001, PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972, AND FIXING THE TIME AND PLACE FOR- A PUBLIC HEARING TO RECEIVE OBJECTIONS THERETO WHEREAS, by Resolution No. 2000 -1688, the City Council ordered the City Manager to cause to be prepared an Engineer's Report for Assessment District 84 -2 for FY 2000/2001, in accordance with Article 4, Chapter 1, Part 2, Division 15 of the California Streets and Highways Code; and WHEREAS, by Resolution No. 2000 -1711, the City Council approved an Excerpt from said Engineer's Report pertaining to Zone 12; and set May 3, 2000, as the date of a public hearing to consider an increase to the Zone 12 assessment; and WHEREAS, pursuant to the requirements of Resolution No. 2000 -1688, the completed draft Engineer's Report; including the above mentioned Excerpt for Zone 12, was filed with the City Clerk on 'the 24th day of March, 2000; and WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed said Engineer's Report and wishes to take certain actions relative to said report and to the levy of the assessments recommended therein. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. The Engineer's Report for "MOORPARK LIGHTING AND LANDSCAPING MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. AD -84 -2" for the fiscal year commencing July 1, 2000, and ending June 30, 2001, filed with the City Clerk on the 24th day of March 2000, is hereby approved. SECTION 2. That said Engineer's Report includes certain information pertaining to a proposed increase to the amount of the assessments for Zone 12, said assessment increase being contingent upon approval via mail ballots to be received by the City on May 3, 2000. 0000EIG Resolution No. 2000 -1721 Page 2 SECTION 3. That the aforementioned further modified or changed, pursuant to 22630 of the Streets and Highways Code. Engineer's Report may be the provisions of Section SECTION 4. That, except as noted in Sections 2 of this Resolution, the assessment amounts proposed for FY 2000 /2001 have not changed from the assessments levied in FY 1999/2000. SECTION 5. That the public interest and convenience require and it is the intention of the City Council of the City of Moorpark to make certain changes, to the "MOORPARK LIGHTING AND LANDSCAPING MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. AD -84 -2" and to order the extension of the annual assessments for said district for the fiscal year commencing July 1, 2000, and ending June 30, 2001, pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, and to levy and collect assessments for certain improvements as described herein, in accordance with said Act. Said "MOORPARK LIGHTING AND LANDSCAPING MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. AD -84 -2" consists of a single city -wide zone to provide electric current or energy for public lighting within the City, to install, construct or maintain any authorized improvements under the Act, including but not limited to'-one or more of street lights, public lighting facilities, landscaping, statuary, fountains, and other ornamental structures and facilities, and any facilities which are appurtenant to any of the aforementioned or which are necessary or convenient for the maintenance or servicing thereof, including irrigation, electric current and energy; and to provide incidental expenses in connection therewith. Said district also includes assessments for the improvement and maintenance of the above described landscaping and related improvements in a number of zones of benefit. SECTION 6. That said lighting and landscape maintenance assessment district shall specifically include the lighting and landscape sites with all improvements located therein, described by and heretofore included within "MOORPARK LIGHTING AND LANDSCAPING MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. AD- 84 -2." SECTION 7. That "the foregoing described work is to be located within said Assessment District, the boundaries of which are more particularly described on maps included in the aforesaid Engineer's Report and entitled "Boundary Map, City of Moorpark Lighting and Landscaping Maintenance Assessment District No. AD- 84 -211, said report and maps being on file in the office of the City Clerk as of the 24th of March 2000. Resolution No. Page 3 2000 -1721 SECTION 8. That the proposed maintenance and improvement, in the opinion of the City Council, is of benefit to, and the City Council hereby makes the expense of said maintenance and improvements chargeable upon the district. SECTION 9. That a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the Assessment District and any zones, therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within said District, is set forth in a copy of the aforementioned Engineer's Report, a copy of which is on file with the City Clerk and open to inspection. SECTION 10. That the proposed assessment amounts are set forth in Exhibit 'A' attached hereto and made apart hereof. SECTION 11. That a public hearing of the Moorpark City Council shall be convened on the 7th day of June 2000, at the hour of 6:30 p.m., in the Council Chambers of the City Hall of said City, located at 799 Moorpark Avenue, Moorpark, for the purpose of receiving oral and written testimony regarding the proposed assessments for FY 2000/2001. SECTION 12. That Notice of said pubic hearing is hereby given. All-persons having any objections to the work or extent of the assessment district may appear and show cause why said work should not be done or carried out or why said district should not be extended for the fiscal year commencing July 1, 2000, and ending June 30, 2001. . Protests must be in writing, filed by the property owner with the City Clerk prior to must conclusion, of the public hearing and such protest shall state all grounds of the objection and shall contain a description sufficient to identify the property. A majority protest will cause the assessment increase to be abandoned. SECTION 13. All the work herein proposed shall be done in accordance with the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, being Part 2 of Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California. SECTION 14. The City Clerk shall cause a Notice of Public Hearing to be given by causing a summary of this Resolution to be published in the manner required by Part 2 of Division,15 of the Streets and Highways Code and Section 54954.6 of the Government Code of the State of California. ® 0,591 ; Resolution No. 2000 -1721 Page 4 SECTION 15. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this resolution and shall cause a certified resolution to be filed in the book of original resolutions. PASSED AND ADOPTED THIS 5th day of April 2000. ATTEST: Deborah S. �1��fe��te�,Cit�y4er k Attachments: Exhibit 1: Assessment Amounts "Resolution No. 2000 -1721 . ?age 5 Exhibit 'A' (Page 1 of 2) AD 84 -2 Summary of Assessments A. City Wide Assessment Use Code Description 0 Residential Vacant 1 Single Family - Level 1 2 Mobil Home 3 Condo (per unit) 4 Residential Income 2-4 units (per unit) 5 Apartments (5 +) (per unit) 6 Single Family - Level 2 9 Mobil Home & Trailer Park (per space) 10 Commercial Vacant Land 11 Retail Store, single story 12 Store & Office Combination (per parcel) 15 Shopping Centers (Neighborhood) 16 Shopping Centers (Regional) 17 Office Building (one story) 18 Office Building (multi -story) (per parcel) 19 Retail Stores (multi -story) (per parcel) 21 Restaurants & cocktail lounges Z4 Banks, Savings & Loans 25 Service Stations 26 Auto sales, repair, storage & rental 30 Industrial Land Vacant 31 Light Manufacturing 32 Warehousing 33 Industrial Condos, Coops, PUD's 38 Mineral Processing 44 Truck Crops 46 Pasture (permanent) 48 Poultry 49 flowers, seed production 51 Orchards 53 Field crops, dry 54 Pastures of graze, dry 55 Feed lots 57 Tree farms 61 Theater 70 Institutional vacant land 71 Churches, convent & rectory 78 Public Bldgs., Fire Houses, Museums 80 Misc, Vacant land 81 Utility, Water Company 83 Petroleum & gas 91 Utility Edison 92 Telephone 93 Railroad Property 94 Undedicated Community Condo Development 99 Exempt Landscaping Lighting Total Assessment Assessment Assessment ($) 0.00 5.21 5.21 13.18 20.85 34.03 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.89 20.85 30.74 9.89 20.85 30.74 9.88 15.64 25.52 13.18 15.64 28.82 9.88 15.64 25.52 0.00 5.21 5.21 51.71 83.41 135.12 51.71 83.41 135.12 172.38 135.54 307.92 517.15 135.54 652.69 51.71 62.56 114.27 103.43 83.41 186.84 103.43 83.41 186.84 51.71 104.26 155.97 51.71 62.56 114.27 51.71 83.41 135.12 17.24 83.41 100.65 0.00 5.21 5.21 206.86 104.26 311.12 68.95 83.41 152.36 51.71 104.26 155.97 51.71 62.56 114.27 34.48 20.85 55.33 34.48 20.85 55.33 34.48 20.85 55.33 34.48 20.85 55.33 34.48 20.85 55.33 34.48 20.85 55.33 34.48 20.85 55.33 34.48 20.85 55.33 34.48 20.85 55.33 34.48 104.26 138.74 0.00 5.21 5.21 0.00 5.21 5.21 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.21 5.21 0.00 0.00 0.00 17.24 41.71 58.95 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Resolution No. 2000 -1721 Page 6 Exhibit 'A,' (2 of 2) AD 84-2 Summary of Assessments B. Zones of Benefit In addition to the Citywide assessments ` listed above by land use, the properties within each of the Zones listed below will be assessed a per lot Zone assessment for the maintenance of certain improvements determined to be of benefit to the properties within those zones. 207,799.92 C 538 Annual Assessment Amount Without Added Amount per Year for 13,814.73 A Debris Basin Cleaning ($) Debris Basin Cleaning (s) Zone Description Total # Lots Per Lot f$) Total. # Lots Per Lot 1 Tract 2851: 9,703 75 129.37 __ 2 Tract 2865: 72,484 622 116.47 1,400 48 29.17 3 Tract 3032: 3,079 265 11.62 -- -- 4 Tract 3274: 6,383 129 49.48 -- __ 5 Tracts 3019 & 3525: 23,340 217 107.56 500 75 6.67 6 Tract 3306 (Glenhaven): 924 22 42.00 7 Industrial Park 11,200 A 90.94 A 123.15 (Gabbert P. L A A -- -- -- . ve) 8 Home Acres Buffer: • City Area: • Home Acres 9 Condor Dr. Industrial Park 10 Mt. Meadows PC -3: Residential Commercial 7,576 492 15.40 7,576 201 37.69 1,350 A 49.21 A a 27.43 187,394 2,448 7,272 A 11.81 B 194,666 11 Tract 4174: 3,040 g 12 Carlsberg Specific Plan Residential 207,799.92 C 538 Commercial /Industrial 13,814.73 A 98,79 A Institutional 8,346.83 A 6.63 A 29,961.48 76.55 7,252 669 615.71 n/a n/a 337.78 386.24 _ 139.84 1,258.95 dotes A: Acres - or per acre assessment B: 11.81 ac. x 8 EDU /ac. = 95 EDU... x $76.55 / EDU = $7,272.25... / 11.81 ac. = $615.71 / ac. C: Includes EDUs for Public Properties 10.84 n/a 0000.9:.1 V 'Resolution No. 2000 -1721 rage 7 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF VENTURA CITY OF MOORPARK ss. I, Deborah S. Traffenstedt, City Clerk of the City of Moorpark, California, do hereby certify under penalty of perjury that the foregoing Resolution No, 2000 -1721 was adopted by the City Council of the City of Moorpark at a meeting held on the 5th day of April 2000, and that the same was adopted by the following vote: AYES: Councilmembers Evans, Harper, Rodgers, Wozniak and Mayor Hunter NOES None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None WITNESS my hand and the official seal of said City this 18th day of May 2000. Deborah S. Traffenstedt, City Clerk (seal) 0 0 E 6 E t RESOLUTION NO. 2000 -1734 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK/ CALIFORNIA, CERTIFYING THE TABULATION OF MAIL BALLOTS RECEIVED PERTAINING TO THE PROPOSED INCREASE TO THE ASSESSMENTS FOR ZONE 12 OF ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 84 -2 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2000 -2001 WHEREAS, by Resolution No'. 2000 -1688, adopted on January S, 2000, the City Council ordered the preparation of an Engineer's Report for "Moorpark Lighting and Landscaping Assessment District 84 -2" [herein DISTRICT] for Fiscal Year 2000 -2001, in accordance with Section 22500 et. seq. of the Streets and Highways Code; and WHEREAS, said Resolution stated the intent of the City Council to make certain changes to the amount of the assessment for Zone 12 of the DISTRICT, said increases to be made in accordance with the requirements of Article XIII -D of the California Constitution (Proposition 218); and WHEREAS, by Resolution No. 2000- 1711, adopted on March 1, 2000, the City Council approved an excerpt from the Engineer's Report for the DISTRICT for FY 2000/2001, identifying certain improvements to be added to Zone -12 of the DISTRICT and determining the amount of the increase to the Zone 12 assessments required to maintain those improvements; and WHEREAS, by Resolution No. 2000 -1721, adopted on April 5, 2000, the City Council approved the entire Engineer's Report for the DISTRICT for Fiscal Year 2000/2001, which included the aforementioned excerpt for Zone 12, said report being on file with the City Clerk; and WHEREAS, the aforesaid Resolution No. 2000 -1711 (adopted March 1, 2000) set May 3, 2000, at 6:30 p.m. as the date and time of a public hearing to consider the proposed added improvements and increased assessments for Zone 12; and WHEREAS, said Resolution No. 2000 -1711 further directed that a Public Hearing Notice, giving notice of said hearing, be mailed to the owner of each property affected by the proposed assessment increase, as listed in the last equalized secured property tax assessment roll of the County of Ventura; and, WHEREAS, said Resolution further directed that said Public Hearing Notice define and describe the improvements proposed to be added to Zone 12, the total assessment proposed for Zone 12, the amount of the assessment for the parcel owned by the addressee of the Hearing Notice, the duration of the assessment, the reason for the assessment, and the basis upon which the amount of the assessment was calculated; and, 0 -' Resolution No. 2000 -1734 Page 2 WHEREAS, said Resolution further directed that an assessment ballot be provided with the Public Hearing Notice to be mailed to the owner of each affected property, along with a summary of the procedures for marking and returning the ballot to the City to indicate support or opposition to the proposed assessment increase; and; WHEREAS, said summary of the balloting procedures also described the minimum requirements for the approval of the assessment increase and advised that a majority protest would result in the assessment not being imposed; and WHEREAS, said Public Hearing Notices, assessment information and ballots were mailed to the owners of all of the affected . properties at least forty -five (45) days prior to the date of the' hearing; and WHEREAS, said Notice and mail ballots were provided to the owners of the affected properties in accordance with the requirements of Article XIII -D of the California Constitution; and WHEREAS, on May 3, 2000, at the hour of 6:30 p.m. at the City of Moorpark, City Council Chambers, 799 Moorpark Avenue, Moorpark, California, 93021, the public hearing was duly and regularly held as noticed, and all persons interested and desiring to be heard were given an opportunity to speak and be heard, and all matters and things pertaining to the levy were fully heard and considered by this City Council, and all oral statements and all written protests or communications were duly considered; and WHEREAS, at the public hearing the Council tabulated the mail ballots and found that a majority protest as defined by Article XIII -D of the California Constitution did not exist, and this Council thereby acquired jurisdiction to order the levy and the confirmation of the diagram and assessment for Zone 12 of the DISTRICT, prepared by and made a part of the Engineers Report, to pay costs and expenses thereof. NOW, THEREFORE,_THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. A majority protest does not exist. The assessment ballots submitted, and not withdrawn, in opposition to the proposed assessment do not exceed the assessment ballots submitted, and not withdrawn, in favor, weighting those assessment ballots by the amount of the proposed assessment to be imposed upon the identified parcels for which each assessment ballot was submitted. i s Resolution No. 2000 -1734 Page 3 SECTION 2. The Engineer's Report describing the assessments for the DISTRICT for FY 2000/2001, which is scheduled to be considered at a public hearing before the City Council on June 7, 2000, shall provide for the aforementioned assessments upon the properties within Zone 12 of the DISTRICT. SECTION 3. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this resolution and shall cause a certified resolution to be filed in the book of original resolutions. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 3rd day of May, 2000. ATTEST: C I�- J. I Deborah S. Traffenste City Clerk 005 a Resolution No. 2000 -1734 Page 4 STATE OF CALIFORNIA } COUNTY OF VENTURA ) CITY OF MOORPARK ) ss. I, Deborah S. Traffenstedt, City Clerk of the City of Moorpark, California, do hereby certify under penalty of perjury that the foregoing Resolution No. 2000 -1734 was adopted by the` City Council of the City of Moorpark at a meeting held on the 3rd day of May, 2000, and that the same was adopted by the following vote: AYES: Councilmembers Evans, Harper, Rodgers, Wozniak and Mayor Hunter NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None WITNESS my hand and the official seal of said City this 18th day of May 2000. Deborah S. Traffenste City Clerk (seal) 000cl, INSERT JUNE 7 RESOLUTION HERE APPENDIX H ZONE 12 ASSESSMENT CALCULATIONS 00005'' Appendix'H' Carlsberg Specific Plan 23- Mar -00 Landscape Assessment District Zone 12: Parkways & Medians Annual Assessment Calculation Cost Distribution To To To Commercial Lots Institutional Lots Residential Lots Total Area % of Tot. Cost /Yr. $ % of Tot. Cost /Yr. $ % of Totdal Cost lYr. $ % of Tot. Cost /Yr. $ Science Drive Medians 25% 3121.88 0% 0.00 75% 9365.63 100% 12487.50 Parkways 25% 8890.93 0% 0.00 75% 26672.79 100% 35563.73 Easements 0% 0.00 0% 0.00 100% 43480.80 100% 43480.80 Tierra Rejada Road Medians n/a 0.00 n/a 0.00 n/a 0.00 n/a 0.00 Parkways 0% 0.00 0% 0.00 100% 5479.26 100% 5479.26 Easements 0% 0.00 0% 0.00 100% 45573.84 100% 45573.84 Spring Raod Medians n/a 0.00 n/a 0.00 n/a 0.00 n/a 0.00 Parkways 0% 0.00 34% 7258.12 66% 14089.28 0% 21347.40 Easements 0% 0.00 0% 0.00 100% 36033.98 0% 36033.98 Sub -Total 12012.81 7258.12 180695.59 199966.51 Plus Admin (15 %) 1801.92 1088.72 27104.34 29994.98 Total 6.0% 13814.73 3.6% 8346.83 90.4% 207799.92 229961:49 Assessment Calcualation Commercial Lots Institutional Lots Residential Lots Total Res. Property 534.00 lots Public Property 4.00 EDU No. of Lots & EDUs 538.00 total No. of Acres 98.79 6.63 Total Assessment 13814.79 8346.84 207797.12 229958.75 Assmnt per Lot or EDU 386.24 C Assessment per Acre 139.84 A 1,258.95 B Notes: A: $139.83933 rounded up to nearest $0.01. B: $1,258.94923 rounded up to nearest $0.01. C: $386.2452133 rounded down to nearest $0.01 in order to avoid exceeding $229,961.49 limit. 0 Exhibit 2 Changes to Engineer's Report Page 1 of 1 The following is a list of the recommended changes to be made to the Engineer's Report approved by City Council Resolution No. 2000- 1721, adopted on April 5, 2000. 1. Page 8:A second paragraph is hereby added to #12. Carlsberg Specific Plan, describing the manner in which utility costs will be funded for certain of the improvements with Zone 12, to read as follows: Due to the manner in which water and electrical meters were constructed, the utilities (water and electrical) for certain improvements maintained by the Zone 12 assessment are provided by the Property Owners Association / Homeowners Association (POA/HOA) for the adjacent property. Also, the utilities for certain other improvements maintained by one or more POA/HOA are provided by the Zone 12 assessment. A diagram illustrating this reciprocal arrangement is set forth in Appendix E (Boundary Maps) on Page 7.1." 2. Appendix 'E' - Boundary Map [Zone 12 maps] : All of the maps describing the Zone 12 improvements are hereby deleted and replaced with new maps more accurately depicting the improvements to be maintained. The net area of the improvements to be maintained described in the new maps is equal to or less than the area of the improvements as described in the deleted maps. 3. Appendix 'E' - Boundary Maps [Zone 12, Page 7 1]: The maps for Zone 12 are hereby amended by adding Page 7.1 showing the reciprocal arrangement for the utility costs for certain improvements maintained by Zone 12 and by adjacent property owners. Exibit 3 (1 of 6) 9,515 2301.7900.7901 5,897 2,035 05/15/00 Assessment District 84 -2 2302.7900.7901 45,725 23,466 2302.3103 Fiscal Activity 2302.8900.8902 212 1,514 2302. ? ? ?? 6,220 FY 1998/99 - 22,232 75,904 45,937 47,212 Beginning Revenue Expenses Ending Description Balance ($) Account No. Amount ($) Account No. Amount ($) Balance ($) Citywide Street Lighting 18,845 2300.3100 + 204,133 2300.8900.8901 211,449 11,529 Landscaping 1/2 consultant 2300.7900.7901 3,500 All other 2300.8900.7901 127,410 Total 68,947 2300.3102 + 162,413 130,910 100,450 Improvements 0 0 0 0 Sub -Total 87,792 366,546 342,359 111,979 Zones of Benefit 1 Landscaping 2 Landscaping Debris Basins Improvements Sub -Total 3 Landscaping 4 Landscaping 5 Landscaping Debris Basins Sub -Total 6 Landscaping 7 Landscaping 8 Landscaping 9 Landscaping 10 Landscaping Debris Basins Sub -Total 11 Landscaping 12 Landscaping 13 Landscaping Sub -total Zones Total (1,583) 693 540 16,012 A 17,245 (239) (5,418) 1,637 516 2,153 983 1,767 (2,037) 1,231 83,856 594 84,450 (159) 0 3,699 102,092 189,884 2301.3102 + 9,515 2301.7900.7901 5,897 2,035 2302.3102 + 68,498 2302.7900.7901 45,725 23,466 2302.3103 1,186 2302.8900.8902 212 1,514 2302. ? ? ?? 6,220 2302.8310.8019 - 22,232 75,904 45,937 47,212 2303.3102 + 2304.3102 + 2305.3102 + 2305.3103 2306.3102 + 2307.3102 + 2308.3102 + 2309.3102 + 2310.3102 + 2310.3103 3,107 6,398 23,620 677 10,440 15,261 1,203 173,266 7,825 181,091 2311.3102 + 1,069 2312.3102 + 0 2313.3102 + 3,980 332,594 699,140 2303.7900.7901 2,220 2304.7900.7901 4,563 2305.7900.7901 20,327 2305.8900.8902 198 2306.7900.7901 775 2307.7900.7901 11,275 2308.7900.7901 11,452 2309.7900.7901 800 2310.7900.7901 153,507 2310.8900.8902 1,500 155,007 2311.7900.7901 360 2312.7900.7901 0 2313.7900.7901 1,350 260,161 602,520 Notes: General : FY 1999/2000 account numbers shown here for reference only. Actual FY 98/99 Account numbers are different A: Plus $5,000 encumbered to Fund Project 2300.8310.8019 - Tierra Rejada Parkway Design 648 (3,583) 4,930 647 5,577 885 932 1,772 1,634 103,615 6,919 110,534 550 0 174,525 286,504 00010" Exibit 3 (2 of 6) 05/15/00 Assessment District 84 -2 Fiscal Activity FY 1999/00 Less Projected Year -End Beginning Plus Revenue Total Expenditures Ending Description Balance ($) Balance ($) Account No. Amount ($) Account No. Amount ($) Citywide Street Lighting 11,529 2300.3100 + 209,394 2300.8900.8901 209,000 11,923 Landscaping 112 consultant 2300.8900.7901 5,000 All Other 2300.7900.7901 136,109 Total 100,450 2300.3102 + 151,888 141,109 111,229 Improvements 0 0 0 0 Sub -Total 111,979 361,282 350,109 123,152 Zones of Benefit 1 Landscaping 2,035 2301.3102 + 9,803 2301.7900.7901 6,200 5,638 2 Landscaping 23,466 2302.3102 + 67,424 2302.7900.7901 45,871 45,019 Debris Basins 1,514 2302.3103 1,400 2302.8900.8902 160 2,754 Improvements 22,232 A 2302.3101 6,220 2302.8310.8019 - 28,452 76,225 Sub -Total 47,212 75,044 46,031 3 Landscaping 648 2303.3102 + 3,129 2303.7900.7901 2,460 1,317 4 Landscaping (3,583) 2304.3102 + 6,383 2304.7900.7901 4,610 (1,810) 5 Landscaping 4,930 2305.3102 + 24,040 2305.7900.7901 23,978 4,992 Debris Basins 647 2305.3103 500 2305.8900.8902 160 987 Sub -Total 5,577 24,540 24,138 5,979 6 Landscaping 885 2306.3102 + 974 2306.7900.7901 853 1,006 7 Landscaping 932 2307.3102 + 11,200 2307.7900.7901 12,150 (18) 8 Landscaping 1,772 2308.3102 + 15,152 2308.7900.7901 11,085 5,839 9 Landscaping 1,634 2309.3102 + 1,450 2309.7900.7901 1,860 1,224 10 Landscaping 103,615 2310.3102 + 198,167 2310.7900.7901 181,687 120,095 Debris Basins 6,919 2310.3103 7,252 2310.8900.8902 2,500 11,671 131,766 Sub -Total 110,534 205,419 184,187 11 Landscaping 550 2311.3102 + 3,090 2311.7900.7901 1,060 2,580 12 Landscaping 0 2312.3102 + 0 2312.7900.7901 0 0 13 Landscaping 6,329 2313.3102 + - 2313.7900.7901 6,329 - Sub -Ttl Zones 174,525 356,183 300963 229,745 Total 286,504 717,465 651072 352,897 Notes A: Plus $5,000 encumbered to Fund Project 2300.8310.8019 -- Tierra Rejada Parkway Design Exibit 3 (3 of 6) Assessment District 84 -2 Revenue Detail FY 1999/00 Description Citywide Street Lighting Landscaping 1/2 consultant All Other Total Improvements Sub -Total Zones of Benefit 1 Landscaping 2 Landscaping Debris Basins Improvements Sub -Total 3 Landscaping 4 Landscaping 5 Landscaping Debris Basins Sub -Total 6 Landscaping 7 Landscaping 8 Landscaping 9 Landscaping 10 Landscaping Debris Basins Sub -Total 11 Landscaping 12 Landscaping 13 Landscaping Sub -Total Zones Total Assessments Account No. Amount ($) 2300.3100 204,757 2300.3102 148,525 353,282 2301.3102 9,703 2302.3102 66,224 2302.3103 1,400 2302. ? ? ?? 6,220 2309.3102 73,844 2303.3102 3,079 2304.3102 6,383 2305.3102 23,340 2305.3103 500 2306.3102 924 2307.3102 11,200 2308.3102 15,152 2309.3102 1,350 2310.3102 194,667 2310.3103 7,252 201,919 2311.3102 3,040 2312.3102 0 2313.3102 0 350,433 703,715 Other Account No. Amount ($) 2300.xxxx 4,637 A 2300.xxxx 3,363 B 8,000 C 2301.3400 100 2302.3400 1,200 2303.3400 50 2304.3400 - 2305.3400 700 2306.3400 50 2307.3400 - 2308.3400 - 2309.3400 100 2310.3400 3,500 2311.3400 50 2312.3400 0 2313.3400 100 5850 13850 05/15/00 Total ($) 209,394 151,888 361,282 9,803 67,424 1,400 6,220 75,044 3,129 6,383 24,040 974 11,200 15,152 1,450 198,167 7,252 205,419 3,090 0 0 356,183 717,465 Notes: A Split based on Share of Revenue » »> 57.96% 4,637 B Split based on Share of Revenue » »> 42.04% ;;3,363 C #2300.2320» 1,000 + #2300.3400» 7,000 = 8,000 . Exibit 3 (4 of 6) 05/15/00 Assessment District 84 -2 Fiscal Activity FY 2000/2001 Less Projected Year -End Beginning Plus Revenue Total Expenditures Ending Account No. Amount($) Description Balance ($) Account No. Amount ($) Balance ($) Citywide Street Lighting 11,923 2300.3100 + 209,973 2300.8900.8901 213,000 8,896 Landscaping 112 Consultant 2300.8900.7901 5,000 All Other 2300.7900.7901 171,459 Total 111,229 2300.3102 + 152,309 176,459 87,079 Improvements 0 0 0 0 95,975 Sub -Total 123,152 362,282 389,459 Zones of Benefit 1 Landscaping 5,638 2301.3102 + 9,803 2301.7900.7901 8,282 7,159 2 Landscaping 45,019 2302.3102 + 67,424 2302.7900.7901 61,265 51,178 Debris Basins 2,754 2302.3103 1,400 2302.8900.8902 200 3,954 Improvements 28,452 A 2302. ? ? ?? 6,220 2302.8310.8019 34,672 89,804 Sub -Total 76,225 75,044 61,465 3 Landscaping 1,317 2303.3102 + 3,129 2303.7900.7901 3,534 913 4 Landscaping (1,810) 2304.3102 + 6,383 2304.7900.7901 6,280 (1,707) 5 Landscaping 4,992 2305.3102 + 24,040 2305.7900.7901 40,883 (11,851) Debris Basins 987 2305.3103 500 2305.8900.8902 200 1,287 (10,564) Sub -Total 5,979 24,540 41,083 6 Landscaping 1,006 2306.3102 + 974 2306.7900.7901 1,121 859 7 Landscaping (18) 2307.3102 + 11,200 2307.7900.7901 14,541 (3,360) 8 Landscaping 5,839 2308.3102 + 15,152 2308.7900.7901 14,948 6,043 9 Landscaping 1,224 2309.3102 + 1,450 2309.7900.7901 2,035 639 10 Landscaping 120,095 2310.3102 + 198,167 2310.7900.7901 264,618 53,643 Debris Basins 11,671 2310.3103 7,252 2310.8900.8902 3,000 15,923 69,566 Sub -Total 131,766 205,419 267,618 11 Landscaping 2,580 2311.3102 + 3,090 2311.7900.7901 1,545 4,125 12 Landscaping - 2312.3102 + 229,959 2312.7900.7901 229,959 (0) Sub -Total Zones 229,745 586,242 652411 163,476 Total 352,897 948,524 1041870 259,451 Notes A: Plus $5,000 encumbered to Fund Project 2300.8310.8019 -- Tierra Rejada Parkway Design Exibit 3 (5 of 6) Assessment District 84 -2 Revenue Detail FY 2000/2001 Description Citywide Street Lighting Landscaping Improvements Sub -Total Zones of Benefit 1 Landscaping 2 Landscaping Debris Basins Improvements Sub -Total 3 Landscaping 4 Landscaping 5 Landscaping Debris Basins Sub -Total 6 Landscaping 7 Landscaping 8 Landscaping 9 Landscaping 10 Landscaping Debris Basins Sub - Total 11 Landscaping 12 Landscaping Sub -Total Zones Total Assessment Revenues Account No. Amount ($) 2300.3100 204,757 2300.3102 148,525 2302.3400 353,282 2301.3102 9,703 2302.3102 66,224 2302.3103 1,400 2302. ? ? ?? 6,220 73,844 2303.3102 3,079 2304.3102 6,383 2305.3102 23,340 2305.3103 500 2310.3400 23,840 2306.3102 924 2307.3102 11,200 2308.3102 15,152 2309.3102 1,350 2310.3102 194,667 2310.3103 7,252 201,919 2311.3102 3,040 2312.3102 229,959 580,392 933,674 Other Revenues Account No. Amount ($) 2300.xxxx. 5,216 A 2300.xxxx 3,784 B 9,000 C 2301.3400 100 2302.3400 1,200 1,200 2303.3400 50 2304.3400 - 2305.3400 700 700 2306.3400 50 2307.3400 - 2308.3400 - 2309.3400 100 2310.3400 3,500 3,500 2311.3400 50. 2312.3400 - 100 5850 14850 05/15/00 Total ($) 209,973 152,309 362,282 9,803 67,424 1,400 6,220 75,044 3,129 6,383 24,040 500 24,540 974 11,200 15,152 1,450 198,167 7,252 205,419 3,090 229,959 100 586,242 948,524 Notes: A Split based on Share of Revenue » »> 57.96% 5,216 B Split based on Share of Revenue » »> 42.04% 3,784 C #2300.2320» 1,000 + #2300.3400» 8,000 = 9,000 000:105 Exibit 3 (6 of 6) 9,703 - 9,703 05/15/00 Assessment District 84 -2 - 66,224 2302.3103 1,400 Assessment Amouunt vs Amount Levied 2302.3101 6,220 6,220 FY 2000/2001 73,844 - 73,844 2303.3102 3,079 A B [A - B] 6,383 Approved Approved Total 2305.3103 Assessment Adjustment Amount Description Account No. Amount ($) Amount ($) Levied ($) Citywide 2307.3102 11,200 11,200 Street Lighting 2300.3100 204,757 15,152 204,757 Landscaping Improvements Sub -Total Zones of Benefit 1 Landscaping 2 Landscaping Debris Basins Improvements Sub -Total 3 Landscaping 4 Landscaping 5 Landscaping Debris Basins Sub -Total 6 Landscaping 7 Landscaping 8 Landscaping 9 Landscaping 10 Landscaping Debris Basins Sub -Total 11 Landscaping 12 Landscaping Sub -Total Zones Total 2300.3102 148,525 353,282 148,525 353,282 2301.3102 9,703 - 9,703 2302.3102 66,224 - 66,224 2302.3103 1,400 - 1,400 2302.3101 6,220 6,220 73,844 - 73,844 2303.3102 3,079 3,079 2304.3102 6,383 6,383 2305.3102 23,340 23,340 2305.3103 500 - 500 23,840 - 23,840 2306.3102 924 924 2307.3102 11,200 11,200 2308.3102 15,152 15,152 2309.3102 1,350 1,350 2310.3102 194,667 194,667 2310.3103 7,252 - 7,252 201,919 - 201,919 2311.3102 3,040 3,040 2312.3102 229,959 229,959 0 580,392 580,392 0 933,674 933,674 00s 1 c "s NOTICE OF A PUBLIC HEARING PUBLIC NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Moorpark, California, on April 5, 2000, adopted Resolution No. 2000 -1721 fixing the date and time of a public hearing of the Moorpark City Council to be held on the 7th day of June, 2000, at the hour of 6:30 p.m. in the Council Chambers of the Moorpark City Hall, located at 799 Moorpark Avenue, Moorpark. The purpose of said public hearing is to consider making certain changes to, and to order the annual assessments for the "MOORPARK LIGHTING AND LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. AD -84 -2" for the fiscal year commencing on July 1, 2000, and ending on June 30, 2001, which would provide for the furnishing of power for and the usual maintenance and servicing of street lights and the landscape maintenance of public rights -of- way within the said City. A copy of Resolution No. 2000 -1721, which is captioned as follows: "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR, AND DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO MAKE CERTAIN CHANGES AND TO ORDER THE ANNUAL ASSESSMENTS FOR THE "MOORPARK LIGHTING AND LANDSCAPING MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. AD -84 -2" FOR THE FISCAL YEAR COMMENCING JULY 1, 2000, AND ENDING JUNE 30, 2001, PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972, AND FIXING THE TIME AND PLACE FOR A PUBLIC HEARING TO RECEIVE OBJECTIONS THERETO," is on file with the City Clerk and open to inspection. A summary of said Resolution is summarized as follows: 1. That the Engineer's Report prepared for Assessment District No. AD84 -2 for FY 2000/2001 is approved. 2. That said Engineer's Report includes information pertaining to a proposed increase to the assessment amounts for Zone 12, which is the area generally bounded by New Los Angeles Avenue, the Route 23 freeway, Tierra Rejada Road and Spring Road. 3. That said Engineer's Report may be further modified or changed, pursuant to applicable State law. Ad84 -01 notice 0 0 0 1 7 Public Hearing Notice AD 84 -2 FY 2000/2001 Page 2 4. That except as noted in Section 3, the assessment amounts for FY 2000/2001 have not changed from the assessments levied in FY 1999/2000. 5. That it is the intention of the City Council a) to make certain changes to Assessment District No. AD 84- 2; b) to order the extension of the annual assessment for said district for FY 2000/2001; and, c) to levy and collect assessments for certain improvements described herein. Said district consists of a single city -wide zone to provide electric current or energy for public lighting within the City, to install, construct or maintain any authorized improvements under the Act, including but not limited to one or more of street lights, public lighting facilities, landscaping, statuary, fountains, and other ornamental structures and facilities, and any facilities which are appurtenant to any of the aforementioned or which are necessary or convenient for the maintenance or servicing thereof, including irrigation, electric current and energy; and to provide incidental expenses in connection therewith. Said district also includes assessments for the improvement and maintenance of the above described landscaping and related improvements in a number of zones of benefit. 6. That said lighting and landscaping maintenance assessment district includes the lighting and landscaping sites with all improvements located therein, described by and included within Assessment District No. AD 84 -2. 7. That the foregoing described work is to be located within Assessment District No. AD 84 -2, the boundary of which is described on a map on file in the City Clerk's office. 8. That said proposed maintenance and improvement is of benefit to, and expense for which are chargeable upon, the district. 9. That a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the District and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable parcels within said District, is set forth Public Hearing Notice AD 84 -2 FY 2000/2001 Page 3 in a copy of the aforementioned Engineer's Report on file with the City Clerk and open to inspection. 10. That the existing assessments, the proposed assessments and the proposed increases to the assessment amounts are set forth in Exhibit 'A' attached hereto and made a part hereof. 11. That a public hearing shall be held on June Council Chambers at the making certain changes assessments for Assessm 2000/2001. of the Moorpark City Council 7, 2000, at 6:30 p.m. in the Moorpark City Hall to consider in, and to order the annual ent District No. AD84 -2 for FY 12. That this Notice of Public Hearing is given, in order that any persons having any objections to the work or extent of the assessment district may appear and show cause why said work should not be done or carried out or why said district should not be extended for the fiscal year commencing July 1, 2000, and ending June 30, 2001. Protests must be in writing and must be filed by the property owner with the City Clerk prior to the conclusion of the hearing. Protests may be mailed to the City Clerk, City of Moorpark, 799 Moorpark Avenue, Moorpark, CA 93021. Protest shall state all grounds for the objection and shall contain a description sufficient to identify the property being assessed. A majority protest will cause the assessment increase to be abandoned. For additional information about these proceedings or assessments contact Ken Gilbert at (805) 529 -6864, Ext. 255. 13. That all the work proposed shall be done in accordance with the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, being Part 2 of Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California. 14. That the City Clerk shall cause notice of said public hearing to be given by causing this summary of the Resolution of Intention to be published in the manner required by Part 2 of Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code and Section 54954.6 of the Government Code of the State of California. 000:;x._19 Public Hearing Notice AD 84 -2 FY 2000/2001 Page 4 15. That the City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this resolution. ATTEST: Deborah S Traffenstedt Patrick Hunter, Mayor THIS NOTICE IS GIVEN pursuant to the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, Section 22500 et. sec. of the Streets and Highway Code of the State of California, and is dated this 5th day of April, 2000. Deborah S. Traffenstedt City Clerk 0 00. ,E_ X_ 4 Public Hearing Notice Exhibit 'A' (Page 1 of 3) AD84 -2 Summary of Assessments A. City Wide Assessments ($) .._._ ................------._.............---._._.............---._._.........._---................_----...._............._-------._._._.........._............._----------........_............._------... ............._--- ._.......,. - -- _ ....................... Proposed: -------- ... ... -..................... Use Existing FY 2000/01: Proposed; Code ;Description Assmnt ($) Assmnt ($) Increase($) 0 Residential Vacant 1 Single Family Level 1 . -- _..... --- 34.03 ........._--- ...... --- ........... -- 34.03: ..._....---------- -- 0.00: - - 2 ...e._.......... ............. --._._._..... ...................._._._._.... Mobil Home .......................... -- ................. ---- ....... _..;.-- 0.00 ............ -- ............................... .... .. 0.00 - - - -- -- --- --- - ._..... _; 0.00 ............... 3 .......... -.... .........__.__...._............ .... _.__ ............................................ ------ .................................... Condo -- .............................. ....... ... ._ 30.74: ............ .-- _ .......... - -_._. ........... 30.74: s.....- --------------- ._._.... 0.00: - ._._._.._.... 4 -- ._.......... - ..................... . - - ...._. ........................_._.... -------- . ..._........................ :Residential Inc. 2 -4 units 4.......... - -- .... _............._._.__._._....... __._.........._.__.........._._ 30.74: _ ............. - .......... 30.74: 0.00: .............. -.-- ........ 5 - .................. -- .............. -- ............... -- ...................... --- ............................. .........._......---___._...._._.................--------._................---- Apartments (5 +) .........._..__.............__ 25.52: ........ _ ............... - -_ ......... 25.52: -- - - - - -- - - -- -- 0.00; ......... -- ..._. _....;...._._.__._ 6 ............. - ............. - ._.......... -- ._.... _._................_.......... . ... _............ Single Family - Level 2 -- ._ ............. - .......... - ._._.......... --- .....:............. -._._.... ......_..................._.... ..........._._..._._._ ......... ..._ ..---- ._....... _ 28.82: ._......._.__......... -- -..... -- ............. ----- 28.82° - ---- --------- - - -- 0.00 9 ................ --- ...... _ .................... :Mobil Home & Trailer Park e.......... . ... _ ................. ._._................. - ................... .-- .................... ..... ... ._...._ ..................... - - -- ...........__- ._..... __ ;..................... 25.52: ;.- ............. .............................. - .................. 25.52: . -- - - - - -- - 0.00: 10 ........._....------._.; ..................................... _..-- ---------------- :Commercial Vacant .........._._.__._ ............. --_-....... ..._....---- ................... .---- ...................... - ............... 5.21: _............ - ._....... - ........ -- ._ 5.21: - - - - -- 0.00: 11 --__- --- .............................. --------- ...._.. single :Retail Store, stor .............._. -- ..... - 135.12; - 135.12 ---- - - - - -- -- - 0.00: 12 :Store & Office Combination 135.12: 135.12: 0.00: . -- 15 ............. -- ....... - - ... ..................... --- .................... ---. g- ..... ................._............. - - ._....;._................ !Shopping Centers (Neighborhood) .:.......... -- ._....... -- .......... -- ._............. - - - -- .._ ............. ----.......:_. 307.92; ............--- .....--- ........ - 307.92 -- _ 0.00: 16 - -- ._._......._ .............................. Shopping Cent. ers........_.._Regional)........ _ -- .............. . 65. 2..__ 69......_._ 52.._..... -- - - - - -- �._:- �.�...... -- 17 - ....._ - - -- - .......................... Office Building (one story) 114.27: _._......._.__._.._6- ............... 114.27; .------------- 0.00: _ ................ -- _...._.._1-8.- ._.;..._Office ._.......... - ._._._.... - ._.......... --- ............ -- ._.................. -----._._ ._......................._....- Building (multi-story) -- ....._ .. -- ._..... _ _84......._..._.........._.__. ............. _...... ---.........---- 186.84 0.00 19 --.---- ...................._.... :Retail Store (multi- story) ... .............. ... ............. -._ ................ --_...._.......---_-...-.........._...._------._..._...._.... - -186 186.84 _.........--- ._..........--- ._._......... 186.84 ...... - - - - - -- _.__._._...._._.........; 0.00: ................. s 21 _ ........._............- .- . - - -__ .-................... Restaurants & Cocktail lounges ........... -_ ................ -- ................ -..................... --- ._...._.......... -._ ......_._...._--- ..._........._ 155.97' _....._.. -- .... - -- 155.971 ........._.-_ ... ----- - - -... _.... 0.00: 24 - -...... . :Banks, - Saving - &- - ._......._....... -- 114.27 , _...... - ._...:..... 114.27 _......._ ............. - 0.00 25 ..................... --- ^Loans . ......................_.... - - -- - - -- ........................ :Service Stations s.............. -----............ ....---- ._ ................ - - -- - ._.............. .__._...........__............. 135.12: .......- ...--- .............---- ._.................... 135.12 _ 0.00: , 2._6....- _.... ............................... _....--------- .._._. ...._Auto....._sales� repair, storage ......_ etc:.__._.._ ....................... . - .......... ........._._._.__1_....._65..._ .......... __. .......... _ - .......- 100.65 - ------- ..._._......... 0.00 30 _._._.. _ . _ :Industrial Land Vacant ... 5.21 -- ._......... - -- ............... --- ...:...... 5.21; ......... - - -- ............... 0.00: ........._3..1....- - -.... Light....__ Manufacturing..------ -- 311 . 12 l -_.. . 311.12 0.00 32 _._......... .............. .... --._ ............................... _ :Warehousing ._ ._._._....... -- ._....... -- ...._...........__ ................__--._._._.........----------._._.. ............................---._..... ............._-- ...........;.__ 152.36: _................__ .........._---........... ._._ .... 152.36' - - -- -..... - ._..................... 0.00: 33 . -- .._._._ ...............,.---._..... ............................_.. -- ..__................_....... Industrial Condos, PUD's .....-- --- ._......._---- ._....- - ._.......... -- ._._................ - ._._._............. - ........:. 155.97; - .........._._ ............ --- .............. ...;............... 155.97; _.. ... - - - -- ----- ........................... ; 0.00: ._._._38 ............._Mineral - - - - - -- ............................... _._._._._._:__ Processing ..... ..................... _ ............................. ._ ............. .... - ...... ,..............._._._ 44 ;Truck Crops . _ ........._ .............. . - .............. ......... 55.33 - -- ... . ._..........- -_- 55.33 .............. 0.00 : _46._._.........__ -- ------._... ......................_........ Pasture... - .(Permanent) ._._ ................... - - ................................... - -- ...................._. ---..........__.__.:........._.__._...._.---- ..... _33 ......._.--- _.........._.__ __._._ 55.33 ' .................................. .........................._.__K 0.00 ...._.__4 8 Poultry .. -- ..................... _ --_._...._ ..................._._.-------._._..._...._...................._...._------......................_.__. -- ._._.............._55 ........... 55.33 _.......... ._ .............. _.. _.__._.........._._... - 55.33 = - ._ .............. - - -- 0.00 .......__49_._._......._ Flowers, _ seed - production .... .................- -- .._. .........-- _._...._.......;._._ - .........._ . 55.33 -- .......... ...._...._._._._.____ 0.00 51 - -- ._....;....._.... Orchards -- ..._......._._.___._._.... --- ..._.......... - - -- ._.........._.... - ._._._........_5.5_:.33 _;._......_....__.........._._ ............ 55.33; -- ._......._.__._._...._._..r_._ 55.33 ..__._.______. -._ 0.00: 53 --- ._._..... ........................._....----- ........................... ..v..._F i e 1 d crops. �......__ary ............. _-_ _- ._._..................._..... - -- _............... ,................ ---- ..._........--- ......._. _ _ F. ................. ... _3._3...- _ ....._._.__._....... -. ............ .__._...... .....,...._ 5.5._.._3 3........... . -- ._._.... - -- - 0.00 _......._5 4 Pastures o....._ f graze, dry . -------- .... ._....... ........... ._- _ ........................ �_ 3._3...... ............ _ ............... 55.33 0.00 55 _.._._._.......... .... Feed lots >._._....... - ._._....... ..... -- ................... ---...._............._._.--_---.-................................. -- -- _._._5.5. 55.33 ............ _._...... ---- .......-- •-- -_....s... 55.33: - - - - - -- - - -- --- -- - 0.00 57 - -- ._ ................ -- - -- --- :Tree farms - ._....... --- ._.......... ......... -- ................. ---._................----- .... ---.. ....._......................_._ ............... _ .... _...._._.__._ ................ _.__._._ ....... . _............................. 55.33: - - .......... _..._.... --- ..;._................_. 55.33: - - - -- - --- ._._._._...........; 0.00: 61 Theater --- ._._....... - - ......................... - -._._. -- ........................_.... _-._ ................ ---- ........_.__._._....... 138.74: ......... ..._............................. ................._._...._._._.__._._._. 138.74 _._........._.........._..... 0.00 70 >. -- ._ ..............^ ..----- Institutional vacant land - . _._......._._._.__._........... .........._.- ... ---._.............----_ .... ................_....-------- ..... .......... ._._...._............._. ___._ ................... ....... ;.... 5.211 ._.............. ......... _ .............. ............. 5.21: _ ....... _._._ ............................ ......_...._.. 0.00: €.....__7?.......... ................ _ .... _.< _._Churche -s-, .convent_ &......_ rectory ..... ......................... ..... - .... _._.... _.........._.----- ............---- . ....... 5.21 _.__ 5.21 O_._.00 -. ` _78._...._.__._Public _._._. Buildings .... .................._._...._._.__ -----... .........................._... :------ ._._ ................. -- -._._.._._.__._.:........ 0.00: .. ...... ...... ...__.......----- ._ .... _...._._ __._._._.............. 0.00: .................- ............. - -- 0.00 . 80 ........ .._---- .....e...----- _ Miscellaneous Vacant Land ._._._.... ............. - ................ --- .................. .---- ............................... -------.-._._._........................------.-... ........................ - -- - ._............. - ._..........__ 5.21; . ...---- .......----- ._.......... 5.21; ._..._._.............. - 0.00 s ........__81 ._._..`....Utility Water Company ......................... ............_.---- ......._._.__ ..._.......-_ 0.00 . 0 . 0 0 0.00 83 ----._ - - -- ._._._._... ._...........e............ Petroleum & Gas .......... -._i_..--t -- -......_._....-d--i-........._--n -- --._......._------._.. .._....................... _._.. ._._............ .__ _ 58.95: ......... _. ........._- ._. .............._.. - ----- -._._. .............. ........... Uliy Eso - - -- ._...._._..................... ..........._.__-___._. _._._......._---- ._......... 0.00 091 0.0 0.0,0 -................. 9 2.._._._. - ._._._._ ._..........................._ _Telephone ..._.... - ..__.......... - -- - .......... ... - - -- ........... ......._.... - - -- -- .......... ..F.-- _......................_.__ 0... 0 0.... _...._._.__............._ ........ - - - -. ; 0 . 0 0 , .... .._._._._.. - - -- - ...._...._ 0 . 0 0 ......... 93 SPRR ..... ............... - -__. _.. _._.___._....__.........____._...._._-__._.... 0.00: _.- _- _._.._,...._.- .- .-- .____ -- - .-- ._._._._._......._. ...........94. - - -- .;._._Community -- Condo....._ Development ._......_._ ................ . ..... - - - -- ..................................... ._.__.... _ .... - - -- 0 _00 _._._.._9.9._._._._. Exempt - ._.......... --- ............. ..-__. ............._....------._._......._................-_.------ ................. _ .... - -- ._._............._._._�_.:.._ .� _.....- .......... - - ._._._...._.__�_;... �- ...._.... -- ....0.00: .._._._...........--.-->-- - 0 . 0 0 ................................ ............................ _. --- + 0.00 01- Public Hearing Notice Exhibit W (Page 2 of 3) AD84-2 Summary of Assessments B. Zone of Benefit: In addition to the Citywide Assessments listed above by land use categories, the properties within each of the Zones listed below will be assessed a per lot Zone assessment for the improvement and maintenance of certain improvements determined to be of benefit to the properties within those Zones. ........ .. .. . . ........... ...... . . ............. . . ................. ................ . ......................... . ......................... ....... . .... . . . .. . . . ..... . ................. ....... . ...... . .... . . ...................... . .............. Proposed Existing FY 2000/01 Proposed Zone Description Assmnt Assmnt Increase($) . . . . ............................ . ....... . .. .. .. .. . . . . ....... .......... 1 Tract 2851: Parkways @ Bambi, 129.37 129.37 0.00 ......... . ....... . . . . . .... Benwood, Pecan and VCFCD Channel ... . . . . ........................................ .. .. ..... ............ ..... ...................... - . . . . . .... . ............ . . . . . ........ .......... . .. ......... .. . ............ . . ........................... . . .. . ........ . .............................. 2 Tract 2865: Parkways east side :Peach Hill, north side Tierra south slopes & Christian Barrett & Spring. • Without Debris Basin Assessment 116.47 116.47 0.00 . .. . . .................. • With Debris Basin Assessment . . ................... . .. . ........................... .... . ............................... . . . . . .. 145.64 . .. . ......................... . .. .. .............................. . ........... 145.64 . ......... . . . . ........... . . ........... ........... . . 0.00 ... . ............................ . . . ............. . . . . . . . . . .. 3 Tract 3032: Butter Creek entry 11.62 11.62 0.00 . .. ........................ IPepper Mill parkway . . .......... . . . - ........................ . . .. . ..................... ............. . . . .... ........ .. . ............ . ............ . . . ............. . . . . ._...._._....................................._......._.....-- 4 Tract 3274: Parkways: north and 49.48 49.48 0.00 .... . . . .................. south side of Williams Ranch Rd. ............ . . .. . . . .......... . . . . . .. . . . . ......................... . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . ......................... ...... . .. .. . ...................... .. . . . . ............ ...................................................... ...................................................... 5 Tracts 3019 & 3525: Parkways: ;north side of Tierra Rejada west side of Peach Hill south side parkway & slope • Without Debris Basin Assessment 107.56 107.56 0.00 .......... .......... • With Debris Basin Assessment ........ . . . ............... . . ...................... . . .. . ..................................... . . 114.23 . ............................... . .. ... ...... ...... .. . ........ 114.23 0.00 ............. 6 Tract 3306: Parkway; west end 42.00 42.00 0.00 . . . . .. . . .................... of Inglewood Avenue. . . . ............. . . . .. . . .................................... ... .. . . ........................... - ................ .............. .. ............. ..................... . . . . . . . ............. ................ . ....... . .... . . . . 7 Industrial Park NE of Gabbert Rd A 123.15 A 123.15 0.00 :and Los Angeles Avenue: Parkway ...................... .. . :north side of L A Ave. . .............. . . ................ .. . ............ .. . . ................... . . ....................... . . . . ................ ...................... . . . .. ....... ..................... . ..... . .. . .............. ... . . ......... .. ............. . . .......... . . . . .......... . .. . . ....... ............... . ...... . . . ... ..... . . ................... 8 'West Village Buffer • City Area 15.40 15.40 0.00 .. ... ... . ............... • Home Acres Area ............. .. . ............... . ............... .. . . . .............. . . . . . . ................... . . . .... . . ... . . . .. . ................................. 37.69 .. .. .. ....................... ... . ........... ....... 37.69 . ........... ............... . .............. ...................... 0.00 . . .... . ....... . ................... . . . . 9 ........ . . . . . . . ....... Condor Drive ........ .. . ................ . . . . ................. .. . . .......... . . . . . . . ................ . . . . . . . . . . . ................... . .... .... . ..... .. . . . . .... . . . ...................... A 27.43 - - --------- ............. . ..... . ................ . .......... A 27.43 . . . ......... . . ............. . . ..... 0.00 10 :Mountain Meadows (PC-3) Residential • Without Debris Basin Assessment 76.55 76.55 • With Debris Basin Assessment 87.39 87.39 . . ................ Commercial . . . ............. . . ........... .............. .. .. . ........... . . ........................ . . . . . ..................................... . . . ........ A 615.71 .................... . . . . . . . . . .......... . . . . . . . . ............. . A 615.71 ........... . ............ . . ........... . . .......... 0.00 ........... 00011-2 Notes: A) per acre assessment 0001- 13 Public Hearing Notice Exhibit 'A' (Page 3 of 3) AD84-2 Summary of Assessments ..................... . . . ................ . ................. . .............. .. . . . ................ . . . . . ............ . ........... . . . . . . . . . . ................... ................ . . . . . . . ................ . . . ............. . ........... . ............ . ............. . . ............ . Proposed .. . . .. . ........................... Existing FY 2000/011 Proposed Zone Description ............ . . . . ................... . . . . . ................................. . . . . . . Assmnt Assmnt Increase($) . . ............... 11 Tract 4174 .................. . ........... .. ................... . ................. . . .................. .. ........................ ... . . . ....... . ...................... . .... . .. . . . . . . . . . .... 337.78 . ................ . .. .. . . .. ..................................................... 337.78 ........... .......... . . ............ .. . .. .......... . . . 0.00 .. . . ...... .................................. . ....... . . . . 12 Carlsberg SP Residential 0.00 386.24 386.24 Commercial 0.00 A 139.84 A 139.84 Institutional . . . .... . .............. . . .. . ....... ...... .. . ............. . . .............. .................. . . . . . . . ...................... . .. . . . . . . . . . .... . . . ................... . 0.00 ....... . .... . . . . .... . ............................. . . ............ . .. . .............. A.1,258.95 . . .......... . . ........... .. . ............... . . ....................................................................... A 1,258.95 Notes: A) per acre assessment 0001- 13 tv,,V A 5 RESOLUTION NO. 2000- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA, MAKING CERTAIN CHANGES TO THE "MOORPARK LIGHTING AND LANDSCAPING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. AD -84 -2" AND CONFIRMING THE ASSESSMENT FOR SAID DISTRICT THE FISCAL YEAR COMMENCING JULY 1, 2000 AND ENDING JUNE 30, 2001. WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Moorpark, by Resolution No. 2000 -1688, adopted January 5, 2000, declared its intention to make certain changes to the "MOORPARK LIGHTING AND LANDSCAPING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. AD- 84 -211, and to order the extension of the annual assessments for said district for the fiscal year commencing July 1, 2000 and ending June 30, 2001; and WHEREAS, said Resolution No. 2000 -1688 ordered the City Manager to cause to be prepared an Engineer's Report for Assessment District 84 -2 for FY 2000/01 in accordance with Article 4, Chapter 1, Part 2, Division 15 of the California Streets and Highways Code; and WHEREAS, said "MOORPARK LIGHTING AND LANDSCAPING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. AD -84 -2" consists of a single city -wide zone to provide electric current or energy for public lighting within the City, to install, construct or maintain any authorized improvements under the Act, including but not limited to one or more of street lights, public lighting facilities, landscaping, statuary, fountains, and other ornamental structures and facilities, and any facilities which are appurtenant to any of the aforementioned or which are necessary or convenient for the maintenance or servicing thereof, including irrigation, electric current and energy; and to provide incidental expenses in connection therewith; and WHEREAS, said "MOORPARK LIGHTING AND LANDSCAPING MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. AD -84 -2" also consists of a number of specific zones in order to provide for the assessment of the properties within said zones for the cost of maintaining certain specified improvements which benefit said properties; and WHEREAS, pursuant to the terms of a Joint Powers Agreement (JPA) between the City of Moorpark and the County of Ventura, the City Council of the City of Moorpark, by Resolution No. 92 - 860 adopted on June 29, 1992, annexed certain unincorporated area just west of the City known as Home Acres, to the "MOORPARK LIGHTING AND LANDSCAPING MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. AD -84 -2" in order to implement those provisions of the JPA pertaining to the construction and maintenance of a buffer area between said unincorporated area and the West Ranch area of PC -3 (Tracts 4340, 4341 and 4342); and 0002.1' SX, RESOLUTION NO. 2000 Page 2 WHEREAS, in accordance with the provisions of the aforesaid JPA, it has been determined that said buffer area provides benefit to both the aforesaid Home Acres area and the West Ranch area of PC -3, and a Zone of Benefit encompassing said areas was established to allow for the levy of assessments on the properties within said Zone of Benefit for the purpose of developing and maintaining said buffer area; and WHEREAS, the aforesaid Resolution No. 2000 -1688 [1/5/00] also stated the intent of the City Council to make certain changes to the amount of the assessment for Zone 12 of the District, said increases to be made in accordance with the requirements of Article XIII -D of the California Constitution (Proposition 218); and WHEREAS, by Resolution No. 2000 -1711, adopted on March 1, 2000, the City Council set May 3, 2000, at 6:30 p.m. as the date and time of a public hearing to consider the proposed added improvements and increased assessments for Zone 12 and directed that Mail Ballots and Public Notices on the matter be mailed to the owners of all properties affected by said assessment increase; and WHEREAS, said May 3rd public hearing was convened and the results of the Zone 12 Mail Ballots were tabulated; and WHEREAS, finding that a majority protest did not exist, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2000 - 1734, on May 3, 2000, confirming the results of the Mail Ballots supporting the proposed increase to the Zone 12 assessments and directing that said assessment amounts be included in the final Engineer's Report for Assessment District 84 -2 for FY 2000/2001; and WHEREAS, the City Council, by Resolution No. 2000 -1721, adopted April 5, 2000, approved the Engineer's Report for the District and set 6:30 p.m., June 7, 2000, as the time and date of a public hearing to consider the levy of all of the assessments for AD84 -2 for FY 2000/2001 ; and WHEREAS, except for the above described increase to the Zone 12 assessments, the assessment amounts proposed for FY 2000/2001 have not changed from the assessments levied in FY 1999/00; and WHEREAS, subsequent to the adoption of Resolution 2000 -1721 [4/5/00] approving the Engineer's Report, the City Council has approved a number of changes to the Engineer's Report as deemed necessary and appropriate; and RESOLUTION NO. 2000 - Page 3 WHEREAS, on June 7, 2000, the City Council held a public hearing to determine whether said changes to said district should be made, and whether the annual assessments should be ordered and confirmed for the fiscal year commencing July 1, 2000, and ending June 30, 2001; and WHEREAS, the City Council finds that written protests against the proposed work or assessment have not been made by owners representing more than one -half of the area of land to be assessed; and WHEREAS, the City Council, having duly received, considered evidence, oral and documentary, concerning the jurisdictional facts in this proceeding and concerning the necessity for the contemplated work and benefits to be derived therefrom, and the City Council having now acquired jurisdiction to order the proposed assessments for the fiscal year commencing July 1, 2000, and ending June 30, 2001. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. The Engineer's Report for "MOORPARK LIGHTING AND LANDSCAPING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. AD- 84 -211, filed with the City Clerk on March 24, 2000, as amended or revised by action of the City Council, is hereby approved and adopted, and the improvements, changes to, and extension of the annual assessments in the Assessment District, in accordance with said report, as revised, and in accordance with Resolution No. 2000 -1721 approving said Engineer's Report, is hereby levied for the Fiscal Year 2000/01. SECTION 2. The City Clerk shall cause the diagram and assessment, or a certified copy thereof, to be filed with the County Auditor. SECTION 3. The City .Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this resolution and shall cause a certified resolution to be filed in the book of original resolutions. PASSED AND ADOPTED THIS day of , 2000. Patrick Hunter, Mayor ATTEST: Deborah S. Traffenstedt, City Clerk 0001J,L6