HomeMy WebLinkAboutAGENDA REPORT 2000 0802 CC REG ITEM 09B01. te.
NW fAIkW1!
MOORPARK CITY COUNCIL _ '1'16,'
AGENDA REPORT
To: Honorable City Council
From: Wayne Loftus, Community Development Di.rector/40�
Date: July 27, 2000 (Cc Meeting Of 8/2/2000)
Subject: Consider Industrial Planned Development No. 99 -4 for
Development of an Industrial /Warehouse Building of
Approximately 72,500 Square Feet on Property Located on
the East Side of Condor Drive, Approximately Mid -point
between each Intersection of Condor Drive and Los Angeles
Avenue East, on the Application of F&A Investments,
(Assessors Parcel No. 513 -0- 060 -095). (Continued from July
19, 2000, Meeting with Public Hearing Open.)
Background
This item was originally scheduled for public hearing before the
City Council on July 19, 2000. However, because the revised drawings
showing the architectural enhancement requested by the Planning
Commission and agreed to by the applicant were not available in time
for preparation of an agenda report this item was continued to
August 2, 2000, hearing open.
On June 12, 2000, the Planning Commission by a unanimous vote
recommended to the City Council the approval of IPD 99 -4 subject to
conditions. This request for development of an industrial building
of approximately 72,5000 sq. ft. is located on Condor Drive,
approximately mid -way between each intersection of Condor Drive and
Los Angeles Avenue (east) and backs up to the Arroyo Simi. The
Planning Commission in their review of this proposal recommended the
conditions in their initial resolution together with additional
conditions to further enhance the architectural features of the
structure as viewed from Condor Drive, as well as some landscaping
on one side of the building.
Discussion
The subject property located between Countrywide and Teledyne Laars
backs up to the Arroyo Simi and has a slight slope down and away
IIMOR PRI SERVIC#V SharelCommundv DevelopmentlEi e onelClty Council Agenda Reportslcc000802 IPD 99-4 FelsenthatdocS.Somrrw* n ® �
Revel opmenA€ ver�onel-- y�eur�eil-Age�Re. orislss000802 IR8 994-Felsen .r�ee - Created on 07/2NO 9:59 AM o
Honorable City Council
IPD 99 -4
July 27, 2000
Page 2
from portions of Condor Drive. This site has previously received
fill ranging from 10 to 25 feet in depth and additional imported
fill of approximately 13,000 cubic yards will be added to facilitate
development and construction of the proposed structure. Much of the
fill (imported) material will be used to create dock high loading on
the side of the structure (south) which will face the Arroyo Simi.
No loading doors will be placed on any other building elevations and
no loading zones or large truck parking will be visible from Condor
Drive. The front elevation facing Condor Drive includes a large
covered entry, twelve (12') feet of landscaping against the
building, a parking area for thirty -four (34) vehicles and
landscaped areas including berms to reduce the visibility of the
parking adjacent to the street within a minimum twenty -two (22')
foot deep landscaped area along the entire property frontage. The
overall parking requirement of 113 spaces has been achieved with the
bulk of the parking located along the east property line adjacent to
Teledyne Laars and on the south side of the building adjacent to the
Arroyo Simi. As previously noted this building will be configured
for dock height loading although ramp access into a portion of the
building has also been provided. The parking lot adjacent to the
Arroyo Simi includes an adequate area to allow semi - trucks to turn
around, therefore, insuring that their access to and from the site
will always be through a forward movement. A five and one -half (5-
1/2) foot landscaped buffer together with an eight foot (8') high
chainlink fence will be located adjacent to the Arroyo Simi to
separate it from the proposed parking and loading area. Chainlink
fencing is preferred to wrought iron at this location where
significant natural vegetation and habitat exists to protect it from
encroachment by domestic animals and trash. Although not specified
as a condition by the Planning Commission the proposed chainlink
fencing along the Arroyo Simi and along each side property line
where it defines the parking and loading areas on the south side of
this building should be "powder coated" which is the term for a
factory baked on color finish. The powder coating will insure that
the visibility of the fence is reduced and that it compliments the
proposed structure. The most appropriate colors are either black,
brown or green for the fencing. A condition to require the powder -
coated material has been included in the attached resolution. The
return walls along with the chainlink fence that secure the
southerly parking area should be of tilt -up or pour construction to
insure compatibility with the building. Site drainage will be
UAOR PRI SERV1City SharelCommunity DeveloomentlEvervonelCity Council Agenda Reoortslcc000802 IPD 99A Felsenthal.docgl6ea mPAy
DevelePrnentlEvegrenelGityGaut ' - Created on 07126100 9:59 AM
000094
Honorable City Council
IPD 99 -4
July 27, 2000
Page 3
The design of this structure, which is of tilt -up concrete
construction, is unique because of the finish work, accent
materials, and fenestration, which have been incorporated into the
elevations. The northeasterly corner elevation near Teledyne Laars
is comprised of concrete, glass and a stainless steel curving wall,
which together with the stainless steel clad, extended covered
entrance forms, the focal point when approaching this project from
the north. This unique design also extends to the front elevation
through the incorporation of a 300 foot long curve in the Condor
Drive wall elevation resulting in the increased height of the
parapet wall at the center of the building above the front entrance.
This vertical curve in the wall results in an increase of eight (8)
feet (total height of 44'7 ") in the height of this wall as compared
to the parapet height at the corners of the structure, which are at
36'11" in height. The Zoning Ordinance limits the height of
industrial buildings to thirty feet (30') except that height may be
increased to sixty feet (60') when approved by the Director of
Community Development. This design feature presents some problem for
screening of roof mounted equipment because the side parapet walls
are lower than the roof surface center point of the structure where
roof equipment has been located above the mezzanine offices.
Additionally, because of the size of this structure there is for
drainage purposes some slope in the roof which again can be visible
from some locations on Condor Drive and potentially from off -site at
Collins and Highway 118. The project architect proposes to use
galvanized steel panels with horizontal lines to conceal the roof
mounted equipment, which will be left their natural color to blend
with the stainless steel elements, and the sand blasted concrete
walls. The roof covering will also be grey in color to blend with
the concrete walls and stainless steel.
This "first impression" of the proposed structure has been captured
in the color rendering included in the City Council agenda packet
and as Attachment 2 made part of this report. The stainless steel
cladding which is proposed on a portion of the above noted curve
radius and on all surfaces of the horizontal and vertical support
elements of the covered and extended entry has been incorporated
onto the easterly side of the structure (Teledyne Laars) and the
westerly side of the building (Countrywide) beyond the corner
portions of the building as requested by the Planning Commission due
to the high visibility of these areas from Condor Drive. This
11 MOR_PRI_SEMACity SharelCommunity DevelopmentlEveryonelCity Council Agenda Reports1cc000802 IPD 99A Felsenthal.doc
000095
Honorable City Council
IPD 99 -4
July 27, 2000
Page 4
portions of the building as requested by the Planning Commission due
to the high visibility of these areas from Condor Drive. This
stainless steel cladding together with additional glass inserts and
a stainless steel "eyebrow" over the glass areas provide symmetry to
the building and create a corporate office image.
The extension of these architectural elements to the east and west
(adjacent to Countrywide) elevations was a condition established by
the Planning Commission and agreed to by the applicant. The area of
architectural detail was determined upon a line -of -sight study as
required by the Planning Commission that was submitted to staff
which depicted those portions of the building elevation that were
actually visible from Condor Drive. In addition to these
architectural enhancements, additional landscaping, primarily
consisting of trees at the Countrywide elevation was also required
by the Planning Commission. Those portion's of the structure which
are not treated with stainless steel cladding or where glazing is
not installed will be sandblasted to create an aggregate surface or
painted in an off white with a yellow /green color on the pilasters
to compliment the overall "high tech" design which is proposed by
the applicant. This design which through the proposed building
products and coloration portrays a structure which is intended to be
timeless in its appearance will fit with the existing industrial
buildings and is likely to be the visually dominant structure in
this area because of its unique finish materials and unconventional
lines.
Additional details and a more complete description of this project
may be found in the Planning Commission staff report prepared for
their meeting of June 12, 2000, which is Attachment 3 to this agenda
report. A copy of the Planning Commission minutes and resolution are
also attached to this report (Attachment 4), however, the conditions
of the Planning Commission resolution have not been included. The
changes that occurred to the Planning Commission resolution
initially prepared by staff, involved provisions for architecture
and landscaping which are shown in legislative format on the
attached Council resolution. Also, other recommended conditions are
shown in legislative format that involve "powder coated" chainlink
fencing, provision of a vector control plan and the requirement for
non - evasive landscaping next to the Arroyo Simi.
WOR PRI SERVICity Share\Community DeveloomentlEvervone\City Council Agenda Reaorts1cc000802 IPD 994 Felsenthal.docS GemmupAy
Deveb�rweatl €ve(�onetSity�eunsil Agenda- Re�erts',ec0099 -21. D 99 4 €elsenthal�es - Created on 07126100 9:59 AM
1!1�!-
Honorable City Council
IPD 99 -4
July 27, 2000
Page 5
Traffic generation, which will increase with this proposed
structure, does not present a potential impact to the area beyond
the capability of the existing street system. A Traffic Impact Study
was prepared by Thomas Montgomery, for this project and concluded
that 505 daily vehicle trips would be generated with a maximum a.m.
peak hour directional flow of 60 trips. The level of service of five
intersections which would be affected by this traffic flow were
evaluated and build out projections applied, with the conclusion
that this project would not cause a deterioration in the level of
service below LOS "C" which is the General Plan threshold.
The payment of development fees at the request of the applicant took
place prior to the submission of this application the amount of
$105,356. These "prepaid" development fees were submitted and
accepted at the request of the applicant to facilitate a tax
exchange property transaction and are documented by a signed
agreement from the applicant. These development fee funds have been
retained in a fiduciary account until either project approval or the
passage of a two year period, after which appropriate distribution
would occur to City fund accounts if project approval takes place or
refunded to the applicant if the project is not approved. If the
project is approved by the City Council, the amount of the fees will
change because of the increased square footage proposed and the
balance due will be collected. This balance due for all pertaining
fees has been included in the conditions of approval in the attached
Council resolution.
General Plan Consistency:
This proposed project is consistent with provisions of the General
Plan, and will further Goal No. 10 of the Land Use Element which
encourages new industrial uses to be located adjacent to existing
industrial use. This project qualifies for a Negative Declaration
under the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act
(CEQA) and an Initial Study, prepared by staff has been included in
this agenda report. The Planning Commission has also recommended
approval of the Negative Declaration on June 12, 20000, when action
was taken.
Staff Recommendation:
1. Accept public testimony and close the public hearing.
UAOR PRI SERV\City SharelCommunity Development EvervonelCity Council Agenda Reports\cc000802 IPD 99A Felsenthal.docSAGemmunity
Developments€ very - Created on 07/26/00 9:59 AM
00009
e
AN M
R S •;�'r� ti
y1 ._
V V
r
r .
1 -1 .
-1 FLU
SITE
FLDWY,.
9
GENERAL PLAN MAP
ATTACHMMIT 1 000099
bt.
. '
U MR
pOAbIkV*-
IS
WIN
=°°,
+w,
~
-
*-See
loac ac
jD
6 190
/
.�
'
•
\- TI!'l NzictaY 1
{ � F
gl
ra
.1
I)r al
�ti
f
^G f
•
\- TI!'l NzictaY 1
{ � F
gl
ra
r'
1(
ICI
S c R
52
33i C
LL
NO ROD
1 i ,
5950 Condor Drive, Moorpark, California
A New Industrial Building for
Q
F & A Industrial Investments, L.L.C.
CS -i
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Condor Drive
Gr
e m-
t.
O"Plan
-pa
Plot Pl- Legend
....... . ...... .
E
> OU
Pro je,t Team
-7, 0
r EL
... ......... 0
> 0
0
Z
ob
ILL
Lndox of Drawings
13—
A-0
..................... .............................. ............... ............... .................................... _ .......... .................... ........... . ........ .. ........... . ...._ ._..... -..___.................................. _ .......... _'—
a
yI \ 1 ---------
:I n. •• II -rl i IL L `I I1 `• 1 I L... _ II, I I ... �.r �x1..¢.•e
•• I fill I
North E ""',Su
.....n,...,. �t Jai
I
I
I
I
I
OEast Elevation
l'J Ci � ^� �rwte Legenn Y ��Ip!
• I T _
',.:., _.... _ .............. _ ........r _.:r.ry .........- - - ... Jam_
.a�
-rte
South
Exterior Paint Color Key:
0
w
n West Eleyatlon� °
cx r.s..a...
rlgy
,r cm f•ov+
.... me .ro
....a......n.r_.•.....m
m �O
.„. ur.wM. -. 1.,
C
_r_...
__...
,a
.-. ....• a .....e.... a�. n..,. ..
Ln
T=...
_
-- -�-
LL
Exterior Paint Color Key:
0
w
°"-` "
A -5
0 ....................... .._._._......_........_........
n West Eleyatlon� °
}
tf
Ell 7 J � ......III I ... .... __ _ ------ KeYn eLeaend
w.
of
.I _
KI
,
i I
bE>
---- -j I....I _ > 00
Walf Type" Legend E C
C y �
o - a0i c �
i
..._; 4 ab
a
I
4I
,
a
4 LL
k
a
c
I � i
- " -� - -- - -- -- -- -J �,;
.... .,.>
PD Ground Floor Plan - East
_
[---
�
| -
| ^�^
---- ---
v�y-l.uqe~
~'~------~---~
�
po.o.— '--
k
�
n
�
�
ILA-2
Am LIT�
o
ca
F-1
LL
--_— ------_�
po.o.— '--
k
�
n
�
�
ILA-2
K.Y-I. I..9-d
(D Root Plan -------
C)
C)
C)
I-k
m
ME
-B
ta a', 0>
>
M
LD
c"
a31 C LO
Z <
ca
LL
0
m
A-3
El
0
El
El
�V
0
El
El
El
El
El
El
i� i
El
(D Root Plan -------
C)
C)
C)
I-k
m
ME
-B
ta a', 0>
>
M
LD
c"
a31 C LO
Z <
ca
LL
0
m
A-3
(W..1-E-1 Sectlon
CD
E
Eao
0
cvU
ova
0
10)
r Ln
4
ca
LL
IIFI
_ Condor Drive
, --~-
_
T. ww I �,7
v,
v'�—
Xt
SR. Pl.. Lightfrin Wl-
4 77 71
ri
gom
� ! »
|
(DSite Lighting Plan
'— -- '-- '
�
�
�
s�
Cd
.E ion
o,�*
�� =
� |
� |
U. .
�
�
�
�|
E'D /
... .......
950
t5oA7-i
xraui
JLLA
Hmdl,, sign �A an I,n . ej.0 Conc. Tilt Up Panel
Monument !�Ign p Parapet 0 Metal Clad Wall Foxe (D
.. .. ........ ....
t
A
- - -- - Rolling Oate and Con.. Tilt up well El.Elevation) wE.,> E
... .. ... - ---------- L
. . . .......... ..... .
>
C,
00
Lo
z
U.
0
0
0
n b...
11
ro i1NA�:. --
.... ......... .....
0 Concrete Petlo
'� 1
Ratio Elevation
Trash Enclosure I Elevation
&qqne. Patio Elevation ---
Trash Enclosure 1 Elevation
Trash Enclosure
Trash Enclosure I Plan Trash Enclosure I Elevation sgre 1 Elevation
(Wrostl Enclosure 2 Plan Elevation Trash Enclosure 2 Elevation s
Trash Trash Enclosure 2 ElovL (�hEncl..ur.2 Elevation 8.1rash Enclosure Elevation
M
OIN
M
E
C
m Nom=
O
u
CO
cc
:30, 8
LO
Z-
4
Ca
U.
N,R IZ IN
.... " ""•' M.GRAW EDISON'
..................
MCGRAW-EDISON•
Pambc4C Downlights: Indoor a Ouldoor
low Circuit Avcfloble Option
= H . -HL
==-7--
..... .
Z."
COMM
z
vil
7 .7.
7-
"T
k-4
............
--At
...... ....
I(�.....d D.— Light (F1 8 Ft13)_
t
a it ji:
� .+4 - . ....... ..
Cl)
OPole Mount Fixture and Wall Mount FIxture A (F2. F3. F3B, F3C) Wall Mount Fixture B (F2B)
LL-02 COOPER LIGHTING
.... . ...... . ........
6 Lighting Bollard (FS) - (D Fixture Pole
E
E �
miA�0
> 0
07i 0
=In 0
,C) 0
,
0) c U,
z
ca
LL
OI
E-1
City of Moorpark
Communi ty Development ment De artmentTEM
P
Staff Report
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING DATE: June 12, 2000
AGENDA ITEM NO.:
IPD
994
Industrial Planned Development for one industrial building on a
168,602 square foot parcel
APN
513 -0- 060 -095
CEQA
Negative Declaration
APPLICANT: F &A Investments
REQUEST: Industrial Planned Development Permit for one industrial/warehouse building with
72,460 sq. ft. of floor area on a 168, 602 square foot site. Planning Commission action is a
recommendation to the City Council who will take final action..
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT: A Negative Declaration has been prepared and is subject
to the recommendation of the Planning Commission to the City Council.
LOCATION: 5950 Condor Drive. Located on the easterly side of Condor Drive between its two
intersections with Los Angeles Avenue (Lot 8 of Tract 3492).
rornry "-UJ �f -Mfcl1 OR
' Pan
�� E STANfOk= 5T
1 57
OxfORD �� . . � ,r`� iY �� T � � � v�R5R1' ST
KI = �W,
Z Z !
.. 57 E HARTFORD Si Compus Pan
RECOMMENDATION SUMMARY: Approval with conditions.
ATTACHMENT 3
000114
IPD 99-4
Planning Commission Staff Report
June 12, 2000
Pane 2
BACKGROUND AND PRIOR ACTIONS: No previous Development Permits have been
approved for this site. The subject lot was created by Tract 3492 approved by the County of Ventura
in 1981.
ORDINANCE AND POLICIES:
Section 17.20.060 of the City's Zoning Ordinance requires a Planned Development Permit for an
Industrial Building in the M -1 Zone. A Planned Development Permit requires a discretionary
decision to authorize development and use on a site. Chapter 17.32 of the Zoning Ordinance
establishes standards for parking, loading and landscaping. The parking requirements of the Zoning
Ordinance require a total of 113 parking spaces for this proposed building.
GENERAL PLAN/ ZONING DESIGNATION /LAND USE
Direction
General Plan
Zoning
Land Use
Site:
I -1
M -1
Undeveloped
North:
I -1
M -1
Industrial
South:
FLDWY
OS -20 ac
Flood Control Channel
East:
I -1
M -1
Industrial
West:
I -1
M -1
Industrial
Definitions:
I -1 (Light Industrial), M -1 (Industrial Park District), OS 20 acres (Open Spaces - 20
acres minimum lot size), S (School),
P (Park), FLDWY (Floodway)
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
Industrial Planned Development Permit No. 994
This proposal includes a 72,460 square foot (65,486 sq. ft. ground floor, 6,974 sq. ft. second floor)
tilt -up industrial/warehouse building with associated parking, landscaping, fencing and lighting on
a 168,602 square foot site (Lot 8 of Tract 3492), Assessor's Parcel No. 513-0- 060 -095.
DISCUSSION:
Site Descripti on:
The site of 168,602 square feet is an irregular parallelogram- shaped undeveloped lot which has a
width of approximately 450 feet and a depth of approximately 380 feet with approximately 395 feet
of street frontage along Condor Drive. This lot was rough graded as part of Tract 3492.
Topographically, the property consists of relatively flat ground at an elevation of approximately 590
feet above mean sea level. Existing industrial facilities are present on the adjacent Lot 7 to the east
and Lot 9 to the west. An ascending fill slope approximately 5 to 10 feet in height forms the
westerly boundary of the site with the adjacent developed Lot 9 to the west. The Arroyo Simi
channel is located adjacent and southerly of the site. A descending fill slope, with an approximate
000115
IIMOR PRI SERYWOA(E FOLDERSI PPORTERIWPD99- 460L1NN INGCOMMISSIONSTAFFREPORTNO. LDOC!/08Jun00ll2:ll PM
IPD 99 -4
Planning Commission Staff Report
June 12, 2000
Page 3
gradient of one and one half horizontal to one vertical forms the site boundary with the channel.
Grading for this industrial tract was completed in 1982. The subject site (Lot 8) was graded at that
time and the existing pad was constructed entirely of fill soils placed and compacted on the property.
Based on records reviewed by Earth Systems Consultants (Geotechnical Engineering Report for
development dated August 1, 1999), the depth of fill ranges from approximately ten (10) feet at the
westerly edge of the property at Condor Drive and increases to approximately 25 feet at the easterly
edge of the property near the channel. The fill soils were compacted to at least 90 percent of the
maximum dry density which was the compaction standard applicable to this area at the time of the
grading work.
The site is covered by a moderate to heavy growth of weeds and grasses, and some scattered brush
and trees. There is a riparian growth area located beyond the southerly property line which is
protected by a fifteen (15) foot wide, established dirt roadway which runs along the entire boundary
adjacent to the Arroyo. A Tree Report which evaluated eighteen (18) trees, dated March 2, 2000
was prepared for this project by Tree Life Concern, Inc.. Three (3) trees will be removed as a result
of this development and three (3) trees will be impacted by construction activities within their
driplines. The impacted trees are young California Pepper trees which are hardy, fast growing
species which should sustain the minor encroachments within their driplines.
Access
Access to the property will be provided via two (2), two -way driveways on the eastside of Condor
Drive near the north and south property lines. As proposed, the project will access Condor Drive
via two curb cuts (one 25 'wide and the other 30' wide). The City Engineer has conditioned the
driveways to be constructed in accordance with the latest Ventura County Road Standards and the
plans are required to provide for the removal and replacement of all damaged sections of curb and
gutter which were installed with the initial subdivision improvements for this tract that occurred in
1982.
Application Deemed CompleteJProcessing Expiration Date:
The proposed project was deemed complete on May 29, 2000. The City has 105 days (September
11, 2000) from the date of application completeness to certify the Negative Declaration. From the
date of certification of the Negative Declaration, the City has 60 days to adopt a Resolution to
approve or deny the project.
Parkin g
Pursuant to Section 17.32 of the City's Municipal Code; one parking space is required for each 300
square feet of gross floor area used for office, one parking space for each 500 square feet of gross
floor area used for warehouse (first 10,000 square feet) and one parking space for each 500 square
feet of gross floor area used for manufacturing uses. The proposed project plans show 113 parking
spaces provided on -site which is the minimum required number of spaces consistent with the
Zoning Ordinance provisions.
WOR_PRI_SERVIHOME FOLDE"PPORTERLWPD99 -I PLINNINGCOMMMION STAFF REPORTNO. I.DOCIAWun00 111:11 PM 00 0116
IPD 99-4
Planning Commission Staff Report
June 12,2000
Pace 4
The parking breakdown for each of the three proposed buildings is shown below:
Parking Provided
Standard Spaces
95
spaces
Compact Spaces
14
spaces
Handicapped Spaces
3
spaces ( 1 for every 40)
Motorcycle Spaces
2
spaces (counts as one space)
Total Spaces provided
113
spaces
Parking Required
Office 31 spaces (9,376 divided by 300)
Warehouse 25 spaces (34,384 divided by 500 for first 10,000 sq. ft. then
space for each 5,000 sq. ft.)
Manufacturing 57 spaces (28,700 divided by O�0
Total Spaces Required 113 spaces
Parking spaces for the proposed development will be located in front of the building (adjacent to
Condor Drive), along the easterly properly line (adjacent to Teledyne Laars) and at the rear of the
property (adjacent to the Arroyo Simi). A total of thirty four (34) parking spaces will be located
along the northerly (front of the building adjacent to Condor Drive). The east side of the site
(adjacent to Teledyne Laars) will be the location of the driveway which allows vehicular traffic
access to parking and loading spaces at the rear of the building. There will be single loaded parking
along the east side of the property (thirty eight (38) automobile and two (2) motorcycle) parking
spaces which will be separated from the Teledyne Laars parking spaces by a landscaped buffer.
Compact Parking Spaces
The Zoning Ordinance allows a maximum of ten (10) percent of the total number of parking space
to be compact parking spaces (eleven (11) spaces). As this proposed project proposes a total of
fourteen (14) spaces to be compact (three (3) over the allowed limit), a condition has been included
requiring the number of compact parking spaces be reduced to be consistent with the Ordinance
requirement.
Landscaping:
Section 17.32 of the Municipal Code requires that at least 10% of the area of any planned
development permit shall be devoted to landscaping. This propos -�1 Industrial Planned Development
Permit includes 25,497 sq. ft. (15 %) of the site to be landscaped, which exceeds the minimum
Ordinance requirement. Trees to be provided on -site include California Sycamore and Pepper
Trees. In addition, the landscape palate includes groundcover and shrubs as depicted on the
conceptual landscape plan. Landscaping will also be provided adjacent to the building on all sides
:11 0117
4woR P, sERYINOAE FOLDE)mPPORTERUVPD94 -lPL �NNINGCOMMISSIONAFF TNO P ®
STRF'ORDOG/U1w00 /1
1PD 99-4
Planning Commission Staff Report
June 12, 2000
Page 5
visible from Condor Drive to soften the building mass.
A minimum twenty two ( 22) foot wide landscaped strip will be provided along the property
frontage adjacent to Condor Drive. The landscaping along this street frontage will be bermed and
will have substantial tree planting to provide a canopy to shade the parking area in front of the
building. There will also be approximately a twelve (12) foot wide landscaped area located adjacent
to the building along the Condor Drive between the parking lot and the building. A 5 1/2 foot wide
landscaped area along the entire property line adjacent to the Arroyo Simi is also proposed.. A
combination of 24 and 36 inch box trees are proposed in this landscape strip to provide both shade
coverage for the parking lot and a transition to the vegetation in the flood plain of the Arroyo Simi.
Additional enhanced landscaping is required to be provided within the project to offset the value
of trees removed from the site as specified in the Tree Report prepared by Tree Life Concern.
The east side of the site will have a twelve (12) foot deep area of landscaping in which will be
planted thirty seven (37) trees set among other plant materials. These trees will be of the Tipuana,
California Sycamore, and Lantana varieties. Along the building side of the driveway, another five
foot deep planting bed will support ten trees of the Liquidambar and Ligustrum Japonicum varieties,
among other plant materials. The parking and loading spaces have been located to allow for
transition landscaping adjacent to the riparian drainage area with a 5 1/2 foot planting bed, which
will support thirty six trees of the California pepper and Liquidambar varieties.
One of the goals of on -site landscaping is to provide a sufficiently dense tree- planting plan
emphasizing tall growing trees and/or shrubs so that fifty (50) percent shade coverage of the parking
area can be obtained at the time the on -site vegetation reaches maturity. The applicant has prepared
a Shade Study showing that approximately 43,152 square feet of the site (total of 57,714 sq. ft. in
the parking area) will be provided with shade coverage within five (5) years. This is approximately
8,867b square feet in excess of the fifty (50) percent shade coverage requirement.
The following is a summary of the percentage of landscaping being provided for this proposed
project:
Required by Zoning Ordinance (101/6 of total site area) = 16,860 sq. ft.
Landscaping in parking area 14,394 square feet
Percent of parking area landscaped 21 percent
Total landscaped area 25,497 square feet
Percentage of landscaping on -site 15 percent
Setbacks:
Section 17.24.020B of the Municipal Code requires all buildings in industrial and commercial zones
to be set twenty (20) feet from all existing and planned local connectors and two lane rural
connectors which includes Condor Drive. A minimum of ten (10) feet of landscaping is required
within the property line adjacent to the street and the setbacks are to be landscaped except for
walkways and front -to -back driveways and may not be used for drive aisles or parking. The
000118
1LNOR_PRI_SERVINOME FOLDERSIPPOR7ERLNVPD99- 4IPLINNINGCOMM ISSIONSTAFFREPORTNO. I.DOC1108Jun00 //2:11 PM
1. � ..
Planning Commission Staff Report
June 12, 2000
Paae 6
minimum setback from Condor Drive proposed for this structure is 56 feet. Therefore, it exceeds
the minimum Ordinance requirement.
Building Height:
Section 17.24 of the Municipal Code limits the height of the main structure in the M -1 Zone to 30
feet; however, the height may be increased to 60 feet with approval of the decision - making authority.
The maximum height to the top of the parapet along the street side elevation is approximately 42
feet 6 inches with an overall average to the top of the parapet of approximately 35 feet. This height
is in keeping with the overall scale of the building and of other buildings within the surrounding area
and can be justified by the proposed architectural style.
Architecture and Site Design:
The building will primarily be constructed of tilt -up concrete panels with a three hundred foot long
curving parapet. The concrete panels along the street frontage will be sandblasted, similar to the
Aquaria building located on an adjacent lot. The building entry located at the center of the proposed
structure and the two ends of the street facade will be of steel framed construction clad in brushed
finish stainless steel panels. Thirty percent of the street side elevation will contain glass, which will
be recessed to provide shade and articulation to the building face. The glass will have a green tint
framed with clear anodized aluminum. The entrance area consists of an eighty foot wide by twenty
five foot deep porticol. The building itself will be painted along the east side in a three color scheme
designed to reduce the apparent size of the structure by defining a base, pilasters, and superstructure
through the use of light green, yellow, and white colors in conjunction with panel joints and reveals.
As currently designed this structure conveys a sense of mass and utility. The exterior cosmetic
elements represents a design and aesthetic quality consistent with the community desire for
buildings that enhance visual features incorporate diversity and can be recognized for their quality
of design. Although somewhat unique in its use of some materials, this proposed structure will make
a statement of quality and design uniqueness which will complement the other buildings in the area.
The street elevation of the proposed building has been well done including the stainless steel
cladding and colored glazing, however the remaining elevations have not been consistently treated
and at least two of the three elevations (east facing Teledyne Laars and west facing Countrywide)
require and equal Ievel of fenestration or architectural detail. Incorporating additional glazing by
using spandrel glass and some stainless cladding to cant' the theme to the remaining elevations
should be required. The ends of the building (east - Teledyne Laars and west - Countrywide) are
highly visible from Condor Drive and as currently designed (except for semi- circular features at the
street corners of the structure) as blank walls with only paint as a highlighting feature. The rear
elevation (southerly adjacent to the Arroyo Simi) of this proposed structure, which is approximately
parallel to the Arroyo Simi will not be readily visible from off -site; however, providing some
articulation or textural changes to complement the paint scheme should be incorporated including,
but not limited to the inclusion of sandblasted or exposed aggregate panels to complement the
proposal and paint scheme shall be incorporated subject to review and approval of the Director of
Community Development. Additional building articulation and glazing should be incorporated
along both the easterly (adjacent to Teledyne Laars) and westerly (adjacent to Countywide)
elevations.
000119
1WOR PR!_SERYWOME FOLDERSIPPORTERLNUPD99- ItPLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT NO. I.DOC 1Wun00f/2: I1 PM
IPD 99-4
Planning Commission Staff Report
June 12, 2000
Page 7
As designed, the structure has the potential to be divisible into two (2) lease spaces, but portrays the
image of one (1) building in it's front elevation. The roof of the structure will have forty four large
skylights to provide interior light to the building, none of which can be seen from off -site roadways.
Site Improvements:
The applicant will be providing all necessary on -site and off -site storm drain facilities to
accommodate upstream and on -site flows and will be required to demonstrate that surface drainage
from the site shall not drain over the sidewalk and driveway. Drainage from the site will be collected
in a pipe culvert or curb drain before entering the street and the Arroyo Simi. Both driveways
located along Condor Drive will be designed in accordance with the latest Ventura County Road'
Standards and the plans have been required to provide for the removal and replacement of all
damaged sections of curb and gutter. In addition, all utilities from the property line to the building
will be placed underground.
Loading/Unloading:
Section 17.32 of the Municipal Code requires that each industrial building that exceeds 3,000 square
feet have one loadinglunloading are of at least 12 feet wide by 40 feet long and 14 feet high. As
submitted, this proposed building, which is primarily manufacturing and warehouse, exceeds the
ordinance requirements as there are a total of 13 loading dock areas shown on the site plan, eleven
(11) of which are 12' wide by 40' long and two (2) are 12' wide by 30' long.
Trip Generation:
A Traffic Impact Study dated March 17, 2000, was prepared by Thomas S. Montgomery, PE. The
study concluded that the combination of uses would result in a daily traffic generation of about 505
vehicle trips with maximum directional peak generation of slightly less than 60 vehicle trips per
hour during the typical weekday morning commuter period..
The potential impacts of the additional traffic generated by the mixed -use industrial development
were estimated based on weekday morning and afternoon peak period traffic volume/capacity
relationships calculated at five intersections using "Intersection Capacity utilization" (ICU)
methodology. The five intersections studied as part of the traffic analysis included: High
Street/Spring Road. Los Angeles Avenue/Condor Drive (south), Los Angeles Avenue/Condor Drive
(north), Los Angeles Avenue/the eastbound SR 118 Freeway Ramps and Los Angeles Avenue/the
westbound SR 118 Freeway Ramps for the "existing ", existing plus site ", and total future cumulative
with and without site traffic/ demand/capacity scenarios. The study states that at the present time,
all five intersections are operating at acceptable levels of service (LOS) and would continue to do
so for the hypothetical 'existing plus traffic" scenario. At total cumulative build -out levels in the
year 2010, these intersections would be operating at LOS "A" during both commuter peak periods
with or without site - generated traffic demands pursuant to the Moorpark Area Traffic Model.
However, the proposed arterial by -pass intersecting with Los, Angeles Avenue would eventually
greatly change the traffic volumes throughout the studied intersections. This potential increase has
not yet been determined. The traffic study concluded that the additional traffic generated by the 000120
,WOR_PRI SERYWOME_ FOLDERS IPPORTERLWPD99- IIPLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT NO. I.D0r_(08Jun00l11:11 PM
IPD 99-4
Planning Commission Staff Report
June 12, 2000
Page 8
proposed development would not adversely effect traffic operations on the street system serving the
project site now or in the future.
Air Quali
According to the Air Pollution Control District, the proposed project will not result in a potentially
significant impact on regional air quality. Since the project does contribute air pollutants to the
airshed, a condition has been included in the approving resolution requiring a contribution to the
Moorpark Traffic Systems Management Fund of $.15 per square foot of floor area to fund Traffic
System Management programs.
Other Agency Review:
All conditions of Approval from Agencies and Departments that have reviewed the Industrial
Planned Development Permits have been incorporated into the Conditions of Approval for the
proposed Industrial Planned Development Permits.
Payment of Development Fees:
The City at the request of the applicant has accepted prepaid development fees for this proposed
development in the amount of $105,356. These prepaid development fees have been submitted at
the request of and under the terms of a signed agreement from the applicant and have been retained
in a fiduciary account until either project approval or the passage of a two year period, after which
appropriate distribution will take place including a refund to the applicant if the project is not
approved If the project is approved and conditions established by the City Council., the amount of
fees will be revised as necessary.
GENERAL PLAN CONSISTENCY:
The proposed industrial building is consistent with Goal No. 10 of the Land Use Element of the
General Plan in that the industrial use is located adjacent to existing industrial uses and along a
major transportation corridor. In addition, as conditioned, the proposed structure has design features
that will minimize adverse impacts on the adjacent industrial uses and will serve to enhance the
visual characteristics of the adjoining industrial area.
RECOMMENDATIONS:
1. Open the public hearing, accept public testimony and close the public hearing.
2. Consider the Negative Declaration prepared for the requested entitlements prior to making
a recommendation to the City Council.
3. Adopt Resolution No. _ recommending to the City Council approval of the Industrial
Planned Development Permit No. 99-4.
000121
IIMOR_PR! SERVWOME FOLDERSIPPORTERVdVPD"- 4TLANNING COMMISNONSTAFF REPORT NO. I.DOC 108Jun00 //2:11 PM
IPD 99-4
Planning Commission Staff Report
June 12, 2000
Page 9
ATTACHMENTS:
1. General Plan and Zoning Maps
2. Draft Resolution with conditions
3. Negative Declaration and Initial Study
4. Project Exhibits
000122
11MOR_PR!_SERVI HOME_ FOLDERSI PPORTERLWPD99-1 1PL ANNING COMMISSION SrAFFREPORTNO. 1.DOC1108Jun00 //1:11 PM
RESOLUTION NO. PC- 2000 -31
A RESOLUTION OF THE P77 NNING --OMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF MOO_tPAR'{, CALIFORNIA,
RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNC == APPROVAL OF
INDUSTRIAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT HERMIT NO. 99-
4 ON THE APPLICATION OF F &A INVESTMENTS FOR
ONE INDUSTRIAL /WAREHOUSE BUILDI'.vG LOCATED ON
LOT 8 OF TRACT NO. 3492 ON THE EASTERLY SIDE
OF CONDOR DRIVE BETWEEN ITS TWO INTERSECTIONS
WITH LOS ANGELES AVENUE (ASSESSOR PARCEL NO.
513 -0- 060 -095)
WHEREAS, at a duly noticed public hearing on June 12, 2000,
the Planni_na Commission held a public hearing and conditionally
recommended to the City Council app_ova- of Industrial Planned
Development Permit No. 99 -4 on the applica-:ion of F &A Investments
for a 72,460 square foot (65,486 so. ft. ;round floor, 6,974 sq.
ft. second floor) tilt -up industrial /warehouse building located
on lo"-_ 8 of Tract No. 3492 located on the easterly side of
Condor. Drive between its intersec-.ions ;:ith Los Angeles Avenue
(Assessor Parcel No. 513 -0- 060 -095; and
WHEREAS, at a duly noticed public hear_ng on June 12, 2000,
4he Planning Commission opened the public - earina, took testimony
from all those wishing to testify, and closed the public hearing;
and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission makes the following
findings:
CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA" FINDINGS:
1. `.1'he Negative Declaration /Initial St.:.dy for the project is
complete and has been prepared i.n co-.o -lance with CEQA, and
City policy.
2. '111 e contents in the Negative Declara_ion/Ini--ia- Steady have
been considered in the various dec -sions on the proposed
entitlement request.
INDUS' 'RIAL PLANNED DEVEI.,OPMENT F= ND =NGS:
Based upon the information set fo-'th above, tt is deterri-Lned that
this application with the attached Londit ions meets the
requirements of the C _ty of Moorpark, '_U1711c1pa- Code Section
17.44.030 in hat:
ATTACHMENT 4 000123
Resolution No. PC -2000- 391
IPD 99 -4 (Felsenthal)
June 12, 2000
_'age 2
1. The proposed use is consistent with the intent and
provisions of the City's General Plan and Title 17 of the
Municipal Code.
2. The proposed use is compatible with the character of the
surrounding development.
3. The proposed use will not be obnoxious or harmful or impair
the utility of the neighboring properties or uses.
4. The proposed use will not be detrimental to the public
interest, health, safety, convenience, or welfare.
5. The proposed use is compatible with the scale, visual
character and design of the surrounding properties, designed
so as co enhance the physical and visual quality of the
community, and the structure has design features which
provide visual relief and separation between land uses of
conflicting character.
WHEREAS, the Plannina Commission after review and
consideration of the information contained in the staff report,
the Negative Declaration and public testimony, has reached a
decision on this matter.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY 0
MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA, DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. The Planning Commission does hereby find that
the aforementioned project is consistent with the City's General
Pi-an.
SECTION 2. The Planning Commission has received and
considered the information contained in tine Negative Declaration
prior to aging on the proposed project and :nas found ghat this
document adequately addresses the environmental effects of the
proposed project.
SECTION 3. Pursuant to the provisions of :.he California
I'r:vir.onmen ai Quality Act (Division 13) of the Public Resources
Codo of the Sate o California (beginning at Section 21COOf, the
Planning Cor:-;mission reccmmends to the City Council:
000124
Resolution No. PC -2000- 391_
IPD 99 -4 (Felsenthal)
June 12, 2000
Page 3
1. That the Negative Declaration prepared for this project
has been completed in compliance with CEQA and State Guidelines.
2. That the Necative Declaration be adopted.
SECTION 4. That the Planning Commission recommends to the
City Council approval of Industrial Planned Development Permit
No. 99 -4 subject to the following conditions:
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR INDUSTRIAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMIT
NO. 99 -4
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CONDITIONS - General
Requirements
GENERAL REQUIREMENTS
Permitted Uses
CDD -1. The. permit is granted for the land and project as
identified on the entitlement application form and as
shown on the approved plot plans and elevations. The
location of all site improvements shall be as shown on
the approved plot plans and elevations except or unless
otherwise indicated herein in the following conditions.
All proposed uses of these buildings shall be required
to receive a Zoning Clearance from the Department of
Community Development. The Department may determine
that certain uses will require other types of
entitlements or environmental assessment.
Other Regulations
CDD -2. The develooment is
subject to all applicable
regulations
of the M -1
Zone, and all requirements
and
enactment's
of Federal,
State, Ventura County,
City
authorities,
and any other
governmental entities,
and
all such
requirements
and enactment's shall,
by
reference, become conditions
of t1-:is permit.
Discontinuance cf
CDD -3. The: lncust__i.al Panned Development Perm sha':_l expire
when any of the uses for_ which it is granted is
abandoned for a period of 180 consecutive days.
000125
Resolution No. PC -2000-
IPD 99 -4 (Felsenthal)
June 12, 2000
Page 51
The action of the foregoing direction was approved by the
following roll call vote:
AYES:
NOES:
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED THIS 12TH DAY OF JUNE 2000.
Mark ice co, Chairman
ATTEST:
Celia LaF eur,
Administrative Secretary
000126
Planning Commission, Moorpark, California
Minutes of June 12, 2000
The Regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on June 12,
2000, at 7:00 p.m., located in the Moorpark Civic Center, 799
Moorpark, CA 93021.
1. CALL TO ORDER:
Chairman DiCecco called the meeting to order at 7:18
2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE:
Commissioner Haller led the pledge of allegiance to the
flag.
3. ROLL CALL:
Commissioners Otto, Haller, Parvin and DiCecco were present
at the meeting, and Commissioner Landis was absent.
Staff attending the meeting included John Libiez, Planning
Manager, Paul Porter, Principal Planner, Walter Brown, City
Engineer, Dirk Lovett, Assistant City Engineer, and Celia
LaFleur, Administrative Secretary.
4. PROCLAMATIONS, COMMENDATIONS AND SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS:
John Libiez, Planning Manager introduced the City's new
City Engineer, Walter Brown.
5. REORDERING OF, AND ADDITIONS TO THE AGENDA:
None
6. CONSENT CALENDAR:
A. May 8, 2000 Planning Commission Minutes
MOTION: Commissioner Parvin moved and Commissioner Haller
seconded a motion to approve the minutes of May 8, 2000.
A unanimous voice vote (4:0) approved the motion.
7.. PUBLIC COMMENTS:
None
8. PUBLIC HEARINGS:
A. Consider Industrial Planned Development Permit No. 99
4 on the application of F &A Investments /Jerold
Felsenthal to construct one industrial /warehouse
building on one lot, proposing a total of 72,460 sq.
ft. of floor area. The protect site is located on the
2000 -06-12 pcm 7126100 1:21 PM
OPacket to CM OPacket to CC
000127
Planning Commission, Moorpark, California
Minutes of June 12, 2000
Pages
easterly side of Condor Drive at 5950 Condor Drive
approximately halfway between the two intersections of
Los Angeles Avenue and Condor Drive. Staff
Recommendations: 1) Open the Public Hearina; 2)
Consider the Negative Declaration prepared for the
requested entitlement prior to making a recommendation
to the City Council; 3) Adopt Planning Commission
Resolution No. PC- 2000 -391 recommending to the City
Council approval of Industrial Planned Development
Permit No. IPD 99 -4.
Presented by Paul Porter, Principal Planner. Reference:
Staff Report dated June 12, 2000.
Testimony received from the following:
John Staff, Staff Architect, 2148 -C, Federal Avenue, Los
Angeles, CA 90025. Mr. Staff the project architect spoke in
support of the development and described the architectural
features.
Jerold S. Felsenthal, the applicant, 9201 Wiltshire Blvd,
#301, Beverly Hills, CA 90210. Mr. Felsenthal also spoke in
support of the project. Mr. Felsenthal spoke about
important it was to have approved plans to determine the
cost of construction.
Mr. Felsenthal requested clarification of the following
conditions of approval.
Page 15, CDD -37. c.
"Additional building articulation and glazing (spandrel
glass) shall be incorporated along the easterly and
westerly elevations to the satisfaction of the Director of
Community Development."
Page 34, CED -45.
"Additional surety shall be provided for resurfacing and /or
repair of the full width portion of Condor Drive located
adjacent to the project. The surety shall be used to secure
the curb replacement and overlay or slurry of the street,
as a result of damage from construction work or utility
trenching. The City may require restoration of the streets
before occupancy of the building. Surety will be returned
2000 -06 -12 pcm
000128
Planning Commission, Moorpark, California
Minutes of June 12, 2000
upon the City Engineer accepting the condition of the
street."
Page 37, CED -65.
"Prior to issuance of a Building Permit, the Applicant
shall pay to the City the Los Angeles Avenue Area of
Contribution (AOC) Fee, which shall be the dollar amount in
effect at the time the fee is paid.
If previous payment of this contribution can be
demonstrated, to the City's satisfaction upon concurrence
of the City Manager, the Applicant would not have to pay
the AOC fee."
Page 38, CED -68.
"If directed by the City, the Applicant shall have
repaired, overlayed or slurried that portion of Condor
Drive adjacent the development. The repairs, curb
replacement, parkways, sidewalks, and overlay or slurry of
the streets, as a result of damage from construction work
or utility trenching shall be along the entire length of
the project including transitions unless otherwise approved
and shall be completed to the satisfaction of the City
Engineer."
Mr. Felsenthal received from staff clarification concerning
the conditions of approval questioned.
Steve Sill, Chairman, Moorpark Chamber of Commerce, 12329
Arbor Hill, Moorpark, CA 93021. SUPPORT
The Commission's discussions included the following:
✓ The large amount of soil (cubic yards) imported to the
site and it's distribution and pad height in relation to
the existing surrounding buildings;
✓ Design and aesthetics of the proposed industrial
building;
✓ Lighting;
✓ Parapet wall height and exposed roof- mounted equipment;
✓ Landscaping, questioned how -he shade study was proposed
and the lack of trees planted at the westerly end of the
building;
✓ Proposed three compact parking converted to the size of a
regular parking stall;
✓ Pre -paid development fee agreement;
2000 -06 -12 pcm
000129
Planning Commission, Moorpark, California
Minutes of June 12, 2000
Paae 4
✓ Maintenance and durability of a chain -link, wrought iron,
or a block wall at the rear of the development site;
MOTION: Commissioner Haller moved and Commissioner Parvin
seconded a motion to approve Resolution No. PC- 2000 -391,
recommending City Council approve IPD -99 -4 with
modification to the landscape plan to include tress at the
westerly portion of the proposed site; and modification to
Condition CDD -37. C. and d. to require placement of
enhanced articulation on the east and west elevations
subject to a line -of -sight study along Condor Drive.
Motion: Motion passed with unanimous 4:0 voice vote.
Commissioner Landis absent.
9. DISCUSSION ITEMS:
A. Scheduling for Summer Recess
Commission concurred not to meet in August 2000 unless
critical.
10. ANNOUNCEMENTS OF FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS:
A. Tentative Tract Map No. 5045 for Specific Plan No. 2
John Libiez, Planning Manager provided information
concerning the upcoming public hearing schedule for June
26, 2000.
11. ADJOURNMENT:
The meeting adjourned at 9:08 p.m.
Mark DiCecco, Chairman
ATTEST:
Celia LaFleur, Secretary to
the Planning Commission
2000 -06 -12 61.101 ,30
NEGATIVE DECLARATION
INDUSTRIAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT
IPD 99 -04
LEAD AGENCY:
CITY OF MOORPARK
799 MOORPARK AVENUE
MOORPARK, CA. 93021
APPLICANT:
F &A INVESTMENTS
9201 WILSHIRE BLVD., SUITE NO. 901
BEVERLY HILLS, CA. 90210
PREPARED: APRIL 27, 2000
ATTACHMENT 5 000131
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
Industrial Planned Development Permit No. 99-4 is a request to construct a 72,460
square foot (65,486 sq. ft. ground floor, 6,974 sq. ft. second floor) tilt -up
industrial/warehouse building with associated parking, landscaping, fencing and fighting.
One lot will be used for the development of the building.
The Industrial Planned Development application, IPD 99-04, will establish the design
and control of the industrial building. Access to the property will be via two driveways
from Condor Drive.
PROJECT LOCATION:
The project is located on an irregularly shaped parcel approximately 3.9 acres in size
located on the easterly side of Condor Drive between its two intersections with Los
Angeles Avenue(Lot No. 8 of Tract 3492, Assessor's Parcel No. 513 -0 -060 -095). (See
Figure 1 for location)
PROJECT PROPONENT:
The project is being proposed by:
F&A Investments
9201 Wilshire Blvd., Suite No. 901
Beverly Hills, California 90210
(310)273 -9201
PURPOSE:
The purpose of this Negative Declaration (ND) is to focus upon environmental impacts
of the project identified by the Initial Study. Standard conditions of approval are
required to ensure that any impacts to the community or the project area are reduced to
a level of insignificance. Some impacts when individually considered may not create
significant adverse impacts, but when taken cumulatively may be significant enough to
warrant changes in the project design or implementation of standard conditions to
reduce impacts to a level below significant.
The City of Moorpark has the principal authority to approve the project as the lead
agency for preparing and adopting this ND. The information contained in this document
is intended to assist decision makers in reaching conclusions concerning the
environmental impacts of this project.
F&A Investments
NEGATIVE DECLARATION
April 27, 2000
000132
ENVIRONMENTAL PROCEDURES:
This ND is consistent with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) 1970 as
amended (Public Resources Code 21000 et.seq.), the State Guidelines for
Implementation of CEQA (California Administrative Code 15000 et. seq.), and the City
of Moorpark Rules to Implement CEQA (Resolution 92 -872).
TECHNICAL STUDIES.
The following technical studies were prepared for the project.
1. Traffic Impact Study, Thomas S. Montgomery, March 17, 2000.
2. Geotechnical Engineering Report Proposed Industrial Planned Development,
Earth Systems Consultants, August 5, 1999.
3. Tree Report, Tree Life Concern, March 2, 2000.
EFFECTS FOUND NOT TO BE SIGNIFICANT: NO IMPACT
Aesthetics: The project site does not involve scenic resources of the
community.
Agricultural Resources:
Cultural Resources:
Hazardous Materials:
The project occurs as an in -fill project in the urban core with
no adjacent or abutting agricultural uses, and there are no
agricultural uses on the site.
No archeological or cultural resources are known to exist or
are likely to exist on the site, and no further work is required.
No hazardous materials have been identified on site and no
hazardous sites are identified as affecting the site.
Mineral Resources: No SMARA resources have been identified in association
with the project site. Impacts to regional resources will not
create an impact to the capacity of existing providers.
Population and Housing: The project is consistent with General Plan build out and
land use development for the project area.
Recreation: This proposal is an industrial project and does not require
parks and recreational facilities. However, the project will
contribute to the current and future parks program..
EFFECTS FOUND TO HAVE LESS THAN SIGNIFICANT IMPACT:
The following was found to have some impact, but the level of impact is less than
significant due to requirements to meet mitigation criteria within an existing ordinance or
adopted code.
F&A Investments
NEGATIVE DECLARATION
April 27, 2000
000133
Biological resources: No suitable wildlife habitat was identified within the project
boundary. No sensitive, threatened or endangered species
were expected due to the previous disturbances to the site
and the surrounding industrial developments in the area..
The only resource of concern is the existence of mature
native and decorative, non - native species of trees currently
within the site. The City tree ordinance requires additional
on site landscaping be provided for loss of trees based upon
classification and maturity by replacement through a master
landscape plan.
EFFECTS FOUND TO BE LESS THAN SIGNIFICANT WITH STANDARD
CONDITIONS INCORPORATED INTO THE PROJECT:
The following areas have been found to have impacts upon the project area or
community and are considered insignificant effects with implementation of standard
conditions of approval o:
Air Quality: The project will contribute incrementally to the reduction in air quality
within the region and the community. While the direct impacts of an industrial building
may be less than significant on its own, the cumulative effect of this project with other
projects known to be in development or pending development create significant impacts
for which mitigation is necessary. The applicant will pay a Transportation Management
Fee as an in -lieu fee for air quality impacts generated by the project prior to the
issuance of a building permit for construction. The applicant will also submit a dust
control plan for the site acceptable to the City concurrent with any preliminary (rough)
grading plan. The dust control plan shall address the method and frequency for the
reduction of dust nuisances to adjoining property and shall include the periodic
sweeping of public streets affected by the earth movement and construction phases of
the project.
Geology and Soils: Recommendations are contained in the Geotechnical Engineering
Report prepared by Earth Systems dated August 5, 1999. As a condition of issuance of
a building permit, the applicant will be required to adhere to the recommendations
contained within this report. Drainage, grading, compaction, foundation and footing
specifications and improvements shall be verified and approved by the City Engineer
prior to issuance of any building permits for the project to address required mitigation of
geotechnical issues identified for the site. All water wells, cisterns or cesspools
encountered during grading operations shall be terminated, capped, and or abandoned
consistent with best management practices for these uses. The applicants soils
engineer shall be responsible to ensure that appropriate actions subject to direction of
the local agency having jurisdiction over such use is completed and documentation
provided to the Community Development Department.
F&A Investments
NEGATIVE DECLARATION
April 27, 2000
000134
Hydrology and Water Quality: The project will induce areas of impervious materials
and will require re- routing of on -site water to approved drainage facilities. During and
after construction, a significant increase in -pollution discharge is expected. Best
management practices will be needed to ensure that the level of pollutant discharge is
within the acceptable limits under the regional water quality control plan. Prior to
issuance of a building permit for construction, the applicant shall design and receive
approval by the City Engineer and the Ventura County Flood Control District, for a
Stormwater Quality Management Plan for the project site. The Stormwater
Management Plan shall incorporate the following mitigation measures as a minimum to
control runoff quality into the Arroyo Simi:
Public Services and Utilities: Construction of the industrial building will place
increased incremental demand upon police and fire services above the level currently
required for the site. This increase is within the capability of the servicing agencies. As
a condition of issuance of a building permit, the developer shall be responsible for the
construction of all on -site and off -site improvements necessary to provide utility services
to the site consistent with the rules and regulations of the servicing utility and subject to
any required encroachments permits. Improvements shall include but not be limited to,
water and sewer, natural gas, telephone, and electrical. In addition, prior to issuance of
any building permits the applicant shall pay any applicable police facility fees and other
appropriate public services and utility fees.
Transportation and Traffic: A Traffic Impact Study was completed on March 17,
2000 by Thomas S. Montgomery, P.E. Transportation and Traffic Engineering
Consultant. The study concluded that the street system in the vicinity of the study site is
now operating at acceptable levels of service and would continue to do so for the
"existing plus site" and "total future cumulative with or without site" traffic condition
scenarios. Therefore, it was concluded that the additional traffic generated by the
project would not adversely effect traffic operations on the street system serving the
study site now or in the future.
CONCLUSIONS:
Development of this infill industrial project by F&A Industrial Investments within the City
of Moorpark can be accommodated. Expected impacts can be reduced to a level less
than significant subject to the standard development conditions of approval cited by this
document and contained in the Conditions of Approval for the project. In addition to the
specific standard requirements referenced, the City development review process
evaluates physical and aesthetic qualities of proposed developments . Conditions of
approval for the project will insure compatibility of the proposed project with other
expected developments and existing developments and City development guidelines.
F&A Investments
NEGATIVE DECLARATION
April 27, 2000
000135
CITY OF MOORPARK
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM
INITIAL STUDY
1. Project title: Industrial Planned Development Permit No. 99-4
2. Lead agency name and address:
City of Moorpark
799 Moorpark Avenue
Moorpark, Ca. 93021
3. Contact person and phone number. Paul Porter, Principal Planner (805)529 -6864
Ext. 243
4. Project location: 5950 Condor Drive which is on the easterly side of Condor Drive
between its two intersections with Los Angeles Avenue (Lot 8 of Tract 3492,
Assessor's Parcel No. 513- 0 -060 -095
5. Project sponsors name, address, telephone:
FBA Investments
9201 Wilshire Blvd., Suite No. 901
Beverly Hills, California 90210
(310)273 -9201
6. General Plan designation: 1 -1 (Light Industrial)
7. Zoning: M -1 (Industrial Park District)
8. Description of project:
Construction of a 72,460 square foot (65,486 sq. ft ground floor, 6,974 sq. ft.
second floor) tilt -up industrial/warehouse building with associated parking,
landscaping, fencing and lighting located at 5950 Condor Drive. Provide
necessary public utilities, including undergrounding of utilities as appropriate.
9. Surrounding land uses and setting: Briefly describe the project's surroundings:
North: Industrial Building
South: Arroyo Simi Flood Control Channel
East: Industrial Building
West: Industrial Building.
10. Other public agencies whose approval is required (e.g., permits, financing
approval, or participation agreement.)
\ \MOR PRZ SERV \home folders \PPorter \M \iPD99 -4 \Environmental Checklist Form.doc
00013E
CEQA Determination
I PD99 -4
Page 2
Ventura County Flood Control District
Air Quality Management District
Moorpark Unified School District
Ventura County Sanitation District
Ventura County Fire Department
State of California Transportation Department (Caltrans)
County of Ventura Water Works District 1
ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED:
The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project,
involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact" as indicated by the
checklist on the following pages.
❑ Aesthetics
a Mineral Resources
❑ Agriculture Resources
❑ Noise
X Air Quality
❑ Population/Housing
❑ Biological Resources
o Public Services
❑ Cultural Resources
❑ Recreation
X Geology /Soils
X Transportation/Traffic
❑ Hazards/Hazardous Materials
❑ Utilities I Service Systems
X Hydrology/Water Quality
❑ Mandatory Findings of Significance
❑ Land Use /Planning
. DETERMINATION: On the basis of this initial evaluation:
X I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the
environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
❑ 1 find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the
environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the
project have been made and mitigation measures identified that will reduce impacts to
below the level of significance. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be
prepared.
00013'7
CEQA Determination
IPD99-4
Page 3
❑ 1 find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment,
and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required.
❑ 1 find that the proposed project MAY have a potentially significant impact" or
potentially significant unless mitigated" impact on the environment, but at least one
effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable
legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the
earlier analysis as described on attached sheets. An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT
REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects
that remain to be addressed.
❑ 1 find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the
environment, all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an'
earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards, and (b)
have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR or NEGATIVE
DECLARATION, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the
proposed project, nothing further is required.
Signature(�22 Date: April 27, 2000
Printed name: Paul Porter For City of Moorpark
Principal Planner
000138
CEQA Determination
IPD99 -4
Page 4
AESTHETICS: The project is an in -fill industrial development surrounded by
industrial and flood relief facilities. The lPD plan indicates the use of landscape and
architectural features to reduce view impacts related to the project. Since the project is
located on the valley floor no impacts will be created to visual resources identified by
the General Plan. No mitigation is required.
AGRICULTURAL RESOURCES: The project location and surrounding properties are
totally within the urban core of the City. No agricultural use exists on the vacant site nor
will be affected by its development. No mitigation is required.
AIR QUALITY., The project will contribute incrementally to degradation of regional
air quality. While the direct impacts of the industrial project is not significant in and of
itself, the impacts of the project cumulative with known projects in the area under
development or pending development warrant requirement for fees consistent with
adopted Air Quality Management District practices and City policy. Standard TSM fees
have been incorporated into the standard conditions of approval for the project.
BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES: The site was sufficiently disturbed by prior grading of
the existing pad and weed abatement activities such that its value as habitat for any
species of interest was marginal or non - existent. On site vegetation consists of mostly
of ornamental trees, non - native grasses, and weeds. No bird, mammal or plant species
listed under Federal or State Endangered Species Acts are expected on the site. A
total of eighteen (18) trees were evaluated in the area of the site with a value of
$81,600. Tree removals require replaced of additional trees in addition to the normal
amount of required landscaping under the City's tree ordinance. The conditions of
approval for this project requires that additional landscaping be provided on -site to
compensate for the value of trees any trees being removed.
CULTURAL RESOURCES: As the site has been previously disturbed and graded,
no archeological or cultural resources were found upon the site. Further
archeological/cultural work was not recommended. No mitigation is required.
GEOLOGY AND SOILS: Earth Systems Consultants on August 5, 1999, evaluated
the site for the construction of the proposed industrial building.. Conclusions reached
by Earth Systems were that with the recommendations as described in the report,
indicted that the soils are suitable for construction of the industrial building with
incorporation of the recommendations as outlined in the report. .
HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS: No hazardous materials sites or issues
have been identified on or near the site. No mitigation is required.
000139
CEQA Determination
IPD99 -4
Page 5
HYDROLOGYAND WATER QUALITY: The project will require construction of storm
drainage facilities and curb and gutter to direct flows to collection and disbursement
facilities. An increase in the amount and velocity of runoff is expected due to the
development of structures and hardscape areas. Increase in potential pollution flow can
be expected from streets and roads. NPDES requirements will need to be provided to
minimize pollutant entry to the Arroyo Simi. The project site is within a portion of the
flood hazard area associated with the Arroyo Simi. Measures are provided within the
ND document.
MINERAL RESOURCES: No identified mineral resources exist within the project site.
NOISE: The proposed industrial manufacturing/warehouse building is not expected
to expose people to conditionally acceptable or unacceptable noise levels. Therefore,
this is not considered a significant impact.
POPULATION AND HOUSING: The proposed project is an industrial project which is
proposed to be constructed in an area planned for industrial uses. Therefore, the
project will not alter the location, distribution, density of growth rate of human population
in the City of Moorpark.
PUBLIC SERVICES: Construction of the industrial building will place increased
incremental demand upon police and fire services above the level currently required for
the site. This increase is within the capability of the servicing agencies. It is anticipated
that County Fire resources will be upgraded in the 1999 -2000 budget period to
potentially include a new station within the downtown core area and inclusion of
different fire apparatus. As a condition of issuance of a building permit for construction,
the applicant will be required to pay public service fees in accordance with the current
applicable rate for each service.
RECREATION: As a standard requirement, the applicant will be required to pay a
contribution to the City's future and current parts system.
TRANSPORTATION AND TRAFFIC. The traffic impacts of the project were studied
and reported by Thomas S. Montgomery on March 17, 2000. The report contained
findings and conclusions with all supportive data. In general, it was concluded that the
additional traffic generated by this mixed use project would not cause and significantly
adverse effect on the operation of the street system in the vicinity of the Study Site.
UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS: Development of the site will require not require
the extension of public utility and communication services to the site. Storm drain and
NPDES basin improvements will be required to protect the site and to minimize pollution
out -fall from the site.
000140
INITIAL STUDY CHECK LIST
ENVIRONMENTAL FACTOR ; ,rmwf
AESTHETICS
a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista?
b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including,
but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic
buildings within a state scenic highway?
c)Substantially degrade the existing visual character or 1:1 quality of the site and its surroundings?
d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare
which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in
the area?
AGRICULTURAL RESOURCES:
In determining whether impacts to agricultural
resources are significant environmental effects, lead
agencies may refer to the Califomia Agricultural
Land Evaluation and Site Assessment Model (1997)
prepared by the Califomia Dept. of Conservation as
an optional model to use in assessing impacts on
agriculture and farmland. Would the project:
a)Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or
Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as
shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the
Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the
Califomia Resources Agency, to non - agricultural
use?
b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or 11 a Williamson Act contract?
c)lnvoive other changes in the existing environment
which, due to their location or nature, could result in
conversion of Farmland, to non - agricultural use?
AIR QUALITY - Where available, the significance
criteria established by the applicable air quality
management or air pollution control district may be
relied upon to make the following determinations.
EN
Un wry Lem ew NO,
Spowt SID M,
%'M
wa.o�
�J
X
X
X
X
X
❑ ❑ x
❑ ❑ x
000141
Would the project?
a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the
applicable air quality plan?
b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute
substantially to an existing or projected air quality
violation?
D ❑ o x
c)Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase El
any criteria pollutant for which the project region is
non - attainment under an applicable federal or state
ambient air quality standard (including releasing
emissions which exceed quantitative thresholds for
ozone precursors)?
d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant ❑
concentrations?
e) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial ❑
number of people?
BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES — Would the project:
a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly E] or through habitat modifications, on any species
identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status
species in local or regional plans, policies, or
regulations, or by the California Department of Fish
and Game or U.S. Fish and wildlife Service?
El El
❑ x
q 0
MPM_
LMIMUMI
x
01
X
X
X
b) Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian ❑ �/
habitat or other sensitive natural community El X
identified in local or regional plans, policies,
regulations or by the California Department of Fish
and Game or US Fish and Wildlife Service?
c) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally ❑ ❑ �/
protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the
Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh,
vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal,
filling, hydrological interruption, or other means?
d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any a ❑ �/
native migratory fish or wildlife species or with
established native resident or migratory wildlife
corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery
000142
sites?
e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances ❑ ❑ v El
biological resources, such as a tree /�
preservation policy or ordinance?
f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat ❑ 1:1 El v
X
Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation
Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state
habitat conservation plan?
CULTURAL RESOURCES - Would the project::
a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the ❑
significance of a historical resource as defined in
§ 15064.5?
b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the ❑
significance of an archaeological resource pursuant
to §15064.5?
c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique ❑
paleontological resource or site or unique geologic
feature?
d) Disturb any human remains, including those El
outside of formal cemeteries?
GEOLOGY AND SOILS - Would the project::
a) Expose people or structures to potential El
adverse effects, including the risk of
loss, injury, or death involving:
i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated ❑
on the most recent Aiquist -Priolo Earthquake Fault
Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area
or based on other substantial evidence of a known
fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special
Publication 42.
ii) Strong seismic ground shaking?
iii) Seismic - related ground failure, including
liquefaction?
❑ ❑xI
❑ ❑ x
❑ ❑ x
❑ ❑ X
❑ ❑ x
❑ ❑ X
❑
o
x
❑
❑
❑
x
❑
000143
iv) Landslides?
❑ ❑ ❑ x
b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of a ❑ ❑ v
topsoil? X
c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is ❑ v
unstable, or that would become unstable as a result [I El X
of the project, and potentially result in on- or off -site
landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction
or collapse?
d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table v
18- 1 -B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), ❑ X
creating substantial risks to life or property?
e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting ❑ v
the use of septic tanks or alternative waste water a El X
disposal systems where sewers are not available for
the disposal of waste water?
HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS —
Would the project:
a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the v
environment through the routine transport, use, or El ❑ X
disposal of hazardous materials?
b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the ❑ v
environment through reasonably foreseeable upset 1:1 X
and accident conditions involving the release of
hazardous materials into the environment?
c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or v
acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste 1:1 El X
within one - quarter mile of an existing or proposed
school?
d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of a ❑ v
hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to
Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result,
would it create a significant hazard to the public or
the environment?
e) For a project located within an airport land use a ❑ v
X
plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted,
within two miles of a public airport or public use
000144
airport, would the project result in a safety hazard for
people residing or working in the project area?
f) For a project within the vicinity of a private a 11 El v
X
airstrip, would the project result in a safety hazard for
people residing or working in the project area?
g) Impair implementation of or physically interfere v
with an adopted emergency response plan or ❑ X
evacuation plan?
h) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of v
loss, injury or death involving wildland fires, including a El X
where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or
where residences are intermixed with wildlands?
HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY
Would the project:
a) Violate any water quality standards or waste 11 ❑ v
X
discharge requirements?
b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or ❑ ❑ v
interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such J�
that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a
lowering of the local ground water table levels (e.g. the
production rate of preexisting nearby wells would drop
to a level which would not support existing land uses or
planned uses for which permits have been granted)?
c) Substantially after the existing drainage pattern of the v
site or area, including through the alteration of the 11 El X
course of a stream or river, in a manner which would
result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off -site?
d) Substantially after the existing drainage pattern of the ❑ v
site or area, including through the alteration of the 1:1 X El
course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the
rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which
would result in flooding on- or off -site?
e) Create or contribute runoff water which would ❑ v ❑
exceed the capacity of existing or planned storm /�
drainage systems or provide substantial additional
sources of polluted runoff?
000145
f) Otherwise substantially degrade water quality?
g) Place housing within a 100 -year flood hazard area
as mapped on a Federal Hazard Boundary or Flood
Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation
map?
❑
❑
❑
x
❑
❑
x
o
h) Place within a 100 -year flood hazard area structures 11 El V
X
which would impede or redirect flood flows?
i) Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow? 11 El 0 v
j) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of ❑ ❑ v
loss, injury or death involving flooding, including X
flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam?
LAND USE AND PLANNING
Would the project:
a) Physically divide an established community?
b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or
regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project
(including, but not limited to the general plan, specific
plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance)
adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an
environmental effect?
❑
❑
❑
x
o
❑
❑
x
c) Conflict with any Habitat Conservation Plan [HCP] or v
Natural Community Conservation Plan [NCCP]? a a X
MINERAL RESOURCES — Would the project:
a) Result in the loss of availability of a known ❑ v
mineral resource that would be of value to the region
and the residents of the state?
b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally- ❑
important mineral resource recovery site delineated
on a local general plan, specific plan or other land
use plan?
000146
NOISE —
Would the project result in:
a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise 13 13 ❑ v
X
levels in excess of standards established in the local
general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable
standards of other agencies?
b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive a ❑ ❑ /�
v
groundbome vibration or groundbome noise levels?
c) A substantial permanent increase in ambient a El X ❑
noise levels in the project vicinity above levels
existing without the project?
d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ❑ ❑ �/
ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above
levels existing without the project?
e) For a project located within an airport land use ❑ ❑ v
plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted,
within two miles of a public airport or public use
airport, would the project expose people residing or
working in the project area to excessive noise
levels?
f) For a project within the vicinity of a private ❑ ❑ v
airstrip, would the project expose people residing or
working in the project area to excessive noise
levels?
POPULATION AND HOUSING — Would the project:
a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, y
either directly (for example, by proposing new homes X
and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through
extension of roads or other infrastructure)?
b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, v
necessitating the construction of replacement El El X
housing elsewhere?
c) Displace substantial numbers of people, 13 r-1 El �/
X
necessitating the construction of replacement
housing elsewhere?
000147
PUBLIC SERVICES
a) Would the project result in substantial adverse ❑
physical impacts associated with the provision of
new or physically altered governmental facilities,
need for new or physically altered governmental
facilities, the construction of which could cause
significant environmental impacts, in order to
maintain acceptable service ratios, response times
or other performance objectives for any of the public
services:
Fire protection?
Police protection?
Schools?
Parks?
Other public facilities?
RECREATION -
❑ X ❑
❑
❑
x
❑
❑
o
x
❑
❑
❑
x
❑
❑
❑
x
❑
❑
❑
x
❑
a) Would the project increase the use of existing v
neighborhood and regional parks or other El E] El X
recreational facilities such that substantial physical
deterioration of the facility would occur or be
accelerated?
b) Does the project include recreational facilities or ❑ ❑ ❑ v
require the construction or expansion of recreational
facilities which might have an adverse physical effect
on the environment?
TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC — Would the project:
a) Cause an increase in traffic which is substantial in ❑ ❑ v ❑
relation to the existing traffic load and capacity of the
street system (i.e., result in a substantial increase in
either the number of vehicle trips, the volume to
capacity ratio on roads, or congestion at
intersections)?
000148
b) Exceed, either individually or cumulatively, a level of ❑ El El v
X
service standard established by the county congestion
management agency for designated roads or
highways? �/
c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including ❑ E] El X
either an increase in traffic levels or a change in
location that results in substantial safety risks?
d) Substantially increase hazards due to a design ❑ v
feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous El X
intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm
equipment)?
e) Result in inadequate emergency access? ❑ ❑ ❑ v
f)Result in adequate parking capacity? ❑ ❑ ❑ v
g) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs 13 E3 ❑ v
X
supporting altemative transportation (e.g., bus
turnouts, bicycle racks)?
UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS
Would me project
a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the ❑ v
applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board? 1:1 El X
b) Require or result in the construction of new water 11 E] 1:1 v
X
or wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of
existing facilities, the construction of which could
cause significant environmental effects?
c) Require or result in the construction of new storm ❑ v ❑
water drainage facilities or expansion of existing 1:1 X
facilities, the construction of which could cause
significant environmental effects?
d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve ❑ ❑ ❑ v
the project from existing entitlements and resources, X
or are new or expanded entitlements needed?
e) Result in a determination by the wastewater ❑ El
X
treatment provider which serves or may serve the
project that it has adequate capacity to serve the
project's projected demand in addition to the
000149
provider's existing commitments?
f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted El D v
X
capacity to accommodate the project's solid waste
disposal needs?
MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE , ago,x
VM
WON-
a) Does the project have the potential to degrade El 1:1 11 X the quality of the environment, substantially reduce
the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish
or wildlife population to drop below self - sustaining
levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal
community, reduce the number or restrict the range
of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate
important examples of the major periods of California
history or prehistory?
b) Does the project have impacts that are individually ❑ ❑ V ❑
limited, but cumulatively considerable?
( "Cumulatively considerable" means that the
incremental effects of a project are considerable
when viewed in connection with the effects of past
projects, the effects of other current projects, and the
effects of probable future projects)?
c) Does the project have environmental effects ❑ ❑ ❑ v
which will cause substantial adverse effects on
human beings, either directly or indirectly?
000150
RESOLUTION NO. 2000-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING INDUSTRIAL
PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 99 -4 FOR
CONSTRUCTION OF ONE INDUSTRIAL /WAREHOUSE
BUILDING LOCATED ON LOT 8 OF TRACT NO. 3494
ON THE EASTERLY SIDE OF CONDOR DRIVE BETWEEN
ITS TWO INTERSECTIONS WITH LOS ANGELES AVENUE
ON THE APPLICATION OF F &A INVESTMENTS
(ASSESSOR PARCEL NO. 513 -0- 060 -095)
WHEREAS, at a duly noticed public hearing on July 19 and
August 2, 2000, the City Council considered the application filed
by F &A Investments for approval of Industrial Planned Development
Permit No. 99 -4 for construction of a 72,460 square foot (65,486
sq. ft. ground floor, 6,974 sq. ft. second floor) tilt -up
industrial /warehouse building located on lot 8 of Tract No. 3492
located on the easterly side of Condor Drive between its
intersections with Los Angeles Avenue (Assessor Parcel No. 513 -0-
060 -095; and
WHEREAS, at its meeting of July 19, 2000, the City Council
opened the public hearing and invited public testimony from all
those wishing to testify, however, no one testified and this item
was continued to August 2, 2000, when testimony from all those
wishing to testify was taken and the City Council closed the
public hearing; and
WHEREAS, the City Council after review and consideration of
the information contained in the City Council staff report, the
Negative Declaration and testimony, has found the impacts
resulting from this proposed project would not have a significant
effect on the environment; and
WHEREAS, the City Council, after review and consideration of
the information contained in the staff report for the City
Council meeting, the Negative Declaration and testimony has made
a decision in the matter.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK,
CALIFORNIA, DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
ATTACHMENT 6
000151
Resolution No. 2000 -
Page 2
SECTION 1. The City Council hereby adopts the following
findings:
CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) FINDINGS:
1. The Negative Declaration/ Initial Study for. the project is
complete and has been prepared in compliance with CEQA, and
City policy.
2. The contents in the Negative Declaration/ Initial Study have
been considered in the various decisions on the proposed
entitlement request.
INDUSTRIAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT FINDINGS:
Baped upon the information set forth above, it is determined that
this application with the attached conditions meets the
requirements of the City of Moorpark, Municipal Code Section
17.44.030 in that:
1. The proposed use is consistent with the intent and
provisions of the City's General Plan and Title 17 of the
Municipal Code.
2. The proposed use is compatible with the character of the
surrounding development.
3. The proposed use will not be obnoxious or harmful or impair
the utility of the neighboring properties or uses.
4. The proposed use will not be detrimental to the public
interest, health, safety, convenience, or welfare.
5. The proposed use is compatible with the scale, visual
character and design of the surrounding properties, designed
so as to enhance the physical and visual quality of the
community, and the structure has design features which
provide visual relief and separation between land uses of
conflicting character.
SECTION 2. The City Council has received and considered
the information contained in the Negative Declaration prior to
acting on the proposed project and has found that this document
adequately addresses the environmental effects of the proposed
project.
\ \MOR_PRI_SERV \City Share \Community Developnent \Everyone \Resolutions and Conditions \City Council
Resolution IPD 99 -4.doc
000152
Resolution No. 2000 -
Page 3
SECTION 3. The City Council adopts the Negative
Declaration.
SECTION 4. The City Council approves Industrial Planned
Development Permit No. 99 -4 subject to compliance with the
Conditions of approval.
SECTION 5. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption
of this resolution and shall cause a certified resolution to be
filed in the book of original Resolutions.
PASSED AND ADOPTED THIS DAY OF ,2000.
Patrick Hunter, Mayor
ATTEST:
Deborah S. Traffenstedt, City Clerk
Administrative Secretary
EXHIBIT A - Conditions of Approval
\ \MOR_PRI_SERV \City Share \Community Development \Everyone \Resolutions and Conditions \City Council
Resolution IPD 99 -4.doc
000153
CED -1. City Council Conditions
CED -2. IPD 99 -4
CED -3. Page No. 1
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR INDUSTRIAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMIT
NO. 99 -4
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CONDITIONS - General
Requirements
GENERAL REQUIREMENTS
Permitted Uses
CDD -l. The permit is granted for the land and project as
identified on the entitlement application form and as
shown on the approved plot plans and elevations
(Attchment No. 2 of City Council agenda report dated
7/2_6/2000)_ The location of all site improvements
shall be as shown on the approved plot plans and
elevations except or unless otherwise indicated herein
in the following conditions. All proposed uses of
these buildings shall be required to receive a Zoning
Clearance from the Department of Community
Development. The Department may determine that certain
uses will require other types of entitlements or
environmental assessment.
Other Regulations
CDD -2. The development is subject to all applicable
regulations of the M -1 Zone, and all requirements and
enactment's of Federal, State, Ventura County, City
authorities, and any other governmental entities, and
all such requirements and enactment's shall, by
reference, become conditions of this permit.
Discontinuance of Use
CDD -3.. The Industrial Planned Development Permit shall expire
when any of the uses for which it is granted is
abandoned for a period of 180 consecutive days.
Submittal of Plans to Department of Community Development
CDD -4. All final construction working drawings, grading and
drainage plans, plot plans, sign programs, and
landscaping and irrigation plans (three full sets)
shall be submitted to the Director of Community
Development for review and approval.
EXHIBIT A
\ \MOR PRI SERV \City Share \Community Developme nt \Everxone \Resolurions-and Conditions \cc - 000802 IPD
------ 4 condit_ons.doc Created on 06 /21/00 10.59 AM
- 000154
CED -l. City Council Conditions
CED -2. IPD 99 -4
CED -3. Page No. 2
Use Inauguration
CDD -5. Unless the project is inaugurated (building foundation
slab in place and substantial work in progress) not
later than two (2) years after this permit is granted
this permit shall automatically expire on that date.
The Director of Community Development may, at his or
her discretion, grant up to one (1) additional one (1)
year extension for project inauguration if there have
been no changes in the adjacent areas, and if
Applicant can document that he has diligently worked
towards inauguration of the project during the initial
two year period. The request for extension of this
entitlement must be made in writing, at least thirty
(30) -days prior to the expiration date of the permit.
Abandonment of Use
CDD -6. Upon expiration of this permit, or failure to
inaugurate the use, the premises shall be restored by
the permittee to the conditions existing prior to the
issuance of the permit, as nearly as practicable.
Other Regulations
CDD -7. No conditions of this entitlement shall be interpreted
as permitting or requiring any violation of law or any
unlawful rules or regulations or orders of an
authorized governmental agency. In instances where
more than one set of rules apply, the stricter ones
shall take precedence.
Severability
CDD -8. If any of the conditions or limitations of this permit
are held to be invalid, that holding shall not
invalidate the remaining conditions or limitations set
forth.
Permittee Defense Costs
CDD -9. The permittee agrees as a condition of issuance and
use of this permit to defend, at his or her sole
expense, any action brought against the City because
of issuance (or renewal) of this permit. Permittee
will reimburse the City for any court costs and /or
attorney's fees which the City may be required by the
\ \MOR— PRI —SRRV \City -Share \Community Deve_92ment \Everyone \Resolutions and Conditions \cc - 000802 IPD
- -- - - - -- - -- -- - - -- . ----- -- - --- --
99-9 condi ions.doc Created on 00 /21/00 10:59 AM 0 00
CED -1. City Council Conditions
CED -2. IPD 99 -4
CED -3. Page No. 3
court to pay as a result of any such action or in the
alternative to relinquish this permit. The City may,
at its sole discretion, participate in the defense of
any such action, but such participation shall not
relieve permittee of his or her obligation under this
condition.
Zonina Clearance Prior to Buildinq Permit
CDD -10. Prior to approval of construction plans for plan check
or initiation of any construction activity, a Zoning
Clearance shall be obtained from the Department of
Community Development. If an Applicant desires,
construction plans may be submitted to the Building
and Safety Department prior to approval of this
development permit with a City approved Hold Harmless
Agreement.
Zoning Clearance Required for Occupancy
CDD -11. Prior to initial occupancy or any subsequent change of
tenant occupancy, the owner of the subject building,
or the owners representative shall apply for a Zoning
Clearance from the Community Development Department.
The purpose of the Zoning Clearance shall be to
determine if the proposed use(s) are compatible with
the zoning and terms and conditions of the permit.
Certificate of Occupancy Requirement
CDD -12. No use for which this permit is granted shall be
commenced until a Certificate of Occupancy has been
issued by the Building and Safety Department. In
addition, no Certificate of Occupancy may be issued
until all on -site improvements specified in this
permit have been completed or the Applicant has
provided a faithful performance bond. At the
discretion of the Director of Community Development,
said on -site improvements shall be completed within
120 days of issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy.
In case of failure to comply with any term or
provision of this agreement, the City Council may by
resolution declare the surety forfeited. Upon
completion of the required improvements to the
satisfaction of the Director of Community Development,
the surety may be exonerated by action of the City
Council.
\ \NOR PRI SERV\ City Share \Corr- nunity Development \Everyone \Resolutions and - Conditions \cc_000802 IPD
9 ° -4 cond bons doc Created or 06/21/00 10:59 AN. 000156
CED -1. City Council Conditions
CED -2. IPD 99 -4
CED -3. Page No. 4
Tenant Occupancy
CDD -13. Prior to the occupancy, applicable proposed uses shall
be reviewed and approved by the Ventura County
Environmental Health Division to ensure that the
proposal will comply with all applicable State and
local regulations related to storage, handling, and
disposal of potentially hazardous materials, and that
any required permits have been obtained. If required
by the County Environmental Health Division, the
Applicant shall prepare a hazardous waste minimization
plan.
Change of Ownership Notice
CDD -14. No later than ten (10) days after any change of
property ownership or change of lessee(s) or
operator(s) of the subject building, there shall be
filed with the Director of Community Development the
name (s) and address (es) of the new owner(s), lessees)
or operator(s) together with a letter from any such
person(s) acknowledging and agreeing with all
conditions of this permit.
Other Uses
CDD -15. If in the future, any use or uses are contemplated on
the site differing from that specified in the Zoning
Clearance approved for the occupancy, either the
permittee, owner, or each prospective tenant shall
file a project description prior to the initiation of
the use. A review by the Director of Community
Development will be conducted to determine if the
proposed use is compatible with the M -1 Zone and the
terms and conditions of this permit, and if a Minor or
Major Modification to the Planned Development Permit
is required. All applicable fees and procedures shall
apply for said review.
Business Registration
CDD -16. Prior to the issuance of a Zoning Clearance for tenant
occupancy, the prospective tenant shall obtain a
Business Registration Permit from the City of
Moorpark.
\ \MOR PRI_SERV \City Share \Corr_nunity Development \Everyone \Re- s- o-- l u—tion- s - - an- - d - -C- o--nd- i— ti-o-n- s —\cc - - - 0 00-802 - IPD
-
99-4
conditions.doc created on 06121/00 10 59 AM
000157
CED -1. City Council Conditions
CED -2. IPD 99 -4
CED -3. Page No. 5
Acceptance of Conditions
CDD -17. The permittee's acceptance
commencement of construction
this permit shall be deemed
conditions of this permit.
Fish and Game Rectuirement
of this permit and /or
and/ or operations under
to be acceptance of all
CDD -18. Within two days after the City Council adoption of a
resolution approving this Industrial Planned
Development Permit, the Applicant shall submit to the
City of Moorpark a check for a single fee of $1,250
plus a $ 25.00 filing fee payable to the County of
Ventura, to comply with Assembly Bill 3158, for the
management and protection of Statewide Fish and
Wildlife Trust Resources. Pursuant to Public Resources
Code Section 21089; and (b)Fish and Game Code Section
711.4; (c) the project is not operative, vested or
final until the filing fees are paid.
On -site Improvements .
CDD -19. No Zoning Clearance may be issued for building
occupancy until all on -site improvements specified in
this permit have been provided or the Director of
Community Development approves the acceptance of a
Performance Bond to guarantee the construction and
maintenance of exterior improvements not related to
grading, etc. Said on -site improvements shall be
completed within 120 days of issuance of a Certificate
of Occupancy. In case of failure to comply with any
term or provision of this condition, the City Council
may by resolution declare the surety forfeited. Upon
completion of the required improvements to the
satisfaction of the City, the City Council may reduce
the amount of the bond; however, the bond must be kept
in full force and effect for one year after occupancy
to guarantee that improvements not related to grading
are maintained.
APCD Review of Uses
CDD -20. Prior to occupancy, Ventura County, Air Pollution
Control District (APCD) shall review all applicable
uses to ensure compliance with the California Health
\ \MOR PRI SERV \City Share \Co?nmunity_ - Development \Everyone \Resolutions and Condit-
ons \cc - 000802 IPD
- -- -- - - ------ - - - --- - - - - - -- ---- - - - - - -- -
99_4 cond tions.doc Created on 06 /21/00 10:59 AM 00 5s
CED -1.
City Council
Conditions
CED -2.
IPD 99 -4
CED -3.
Page No. 6
and Safety
Code (Section 65850.5 et seq.) regarding
the use,
storage and disposition of hazardous
materials.
Final Certificate of Occupancy shall be
withheld until compliance with these provisions from
the Ventura
County, Air Pollution Control District is
provided.
Utilities
Assessment District
CDD -21. The Applicant agrees not to protest the formation of
an underground Utility Assessment District.
Continued Maintenance
CDD -22. The continued maintenance of the permit area and
facilities shall be subject to periodic inspection by
the City. The permittee shall be required to remedy
any defects in ground or building maintenance, as
indicated by the City within five (5) days after
notification.
a) The exterior brushed stainless steel shall be
maintained so as to retain it's original luster
throughout the life of this Industrial Planned
Development Permit.
Repair or Maintenance of Trucks
CDD -23. No repair or maintenance of trucks or any other
vehicle shall occur on site, except completely within
a wholly enclosed building.
Noxious Odors
CDD -24. No noxious odors shall be generated from any use on
the subject site.
Uses and Activities to be Conducted Inside
CDD -25. All uses and activities shall be conducted inside the
building(s) unless otherwise authorized by the
Director of Community Development and consistent with
applicable Zoning Code provisions.
Graffiti Removal
CDD -26. The Applicant and his successors, heirs, and assigns
shall remove any graffiti within five (5) days from
written notification by the City of Moorpark. All such
\ \MOR PRI SERV \Cit Share \Community Develo�eit \Everyone \Resolutions and Conditions \cc - 000802 IPD
- -- --- -- --- — .. - -- -- -- -- -- --- - - -- - - - - - --
99-4 onditions.doc Created on 06 /21/00 10:59 AM 00 59
CED -l. City Council Conditions
CED -2. IPD 99 -4
CED -3. Page No. 7
graffiti removal shall be accomplished to the
satisfaction of the Director of Community Development.
Prior to the Issuance of Zoning Clearance for Construction
Landscaping
Submittal of Landscape Plans
CDD -27. Prior to issuance of a Grading Permit, a complete
landscape plan (3 sets), together with specifications
and a maintenance program shall be prepared by a State
Licensed Landscape Architect in accordance with the
Ventura County Guide to Landscape Plans, and shall be
submitted to the Director of Community Development for
review and approval prior to Grading Permit approval.
The landscape plan shall include planting and
irrigation specifications for manufactured slopes over
three (3) feet in height. The purpose of the
landscaping shall be to control erosion, prevent
aesthetic impacts to adjacent property owners,
mitigate the visual impacts of all manufactured slopes
three (3) feet or more in height, and to replace
mature trees lost as a result of construction. The
final landscape plans shall also be in substantial
conformance with the conceptual landscape plan
submitted with the application. The Applicant shall
bear the cost of the landscape plan review,
installation of the landscaping and irrigation system,
and of final landscape inspection. The landscaping and
planting plan submitted for review and approval shall
be accompanied by a deposit as specified by the City
of Moorpark. Additional funds may subsequently need to
be deposited to cover all landscape plan check and
inspection fees. The landscaping shall be approved by
the Director of Community Development and in place and
receive final inspection prior to recordation of the
map or occupancy as determined by the Director of
Community Development. All landscaped areas shall have
an irrigation system. The City's landscape architect
shall certify in writing that the landscape and
irrigation system was installed in accordance with the
approved Landscape and Irrigation Plans. The final
landscape plans shall include landscaping
specifications, planting details, and design
\ \MOR_PRI SERV \Cites Share \Community+ Developme:zt \Everyone \Resolutions and Conditions \cc = 000802 IPD
99 -4 conditions doc Created on 06/21/00 10:59 AM ®1 GO
CED -1. City
Council Conditions
CED -2. IPD
99 -4
CED -3. Page
No. 8
specifications
consistent with the following
requirements:
a)
The permittee shall provide for additional
enhanced landscaping equal to or greater than the
cost of any trees to be removed as determined by
the Director of Community Development. Additional
trees, which form a canopy, shall be provided to
shade parking, driveway areas and other areas as
determined by the Director of Community
Development to offset the value of the trees
removed from the site as specified in the Tree
Report prepared by Tree Life Concern dated March
2, 2000. The landscape plan shall also
incorporate extensive tree landscaping including
specimen size trees as approved by the Director
of Community Development along Condor Drive, and
as otherwise determined by the Director of
Community Development.
b)
The landscaping along Condor Drive shall be
bermed as approved by the Director of Community
Development.
C)
Trees shall be added along the western property
line adjacent to Countrywide. The size, type and
number of trees to be planted shall be subject to
the review and approval of the Director of
Community Development.
d)
The landscape plan shall include the final design
of all sidewalks, barrier walls, streetscape
elements, urban landscaping and pedestrian paths
within the project limits.
e)
All plant species utilized shall be drought
tolerant, low water using variety, and non -
evasive in--proximity to the Arroyo Simi as
determined by the City's Landscape Consultant. .
f)
Landscaping at site entrances and exits and any
intersection within the parking lot shall not
block or screen the view of a seated driver from
another moving vehicle or pedestrian.
g)
Plantings in and adjacent to parking areas shall
be contained within raised planters surrounded by
six -inch high concrete curbs.
\ \MOR PRI SERV \City Share \Commur._ity Development \Everyone \Resolutions and Conditions \cc - 000802 IPD
99 -4 conditions.doc Created on 06%21/00_10:59 AM 000161
CED -1. City
Council Conditions
CED -2. IPD
99 -4
CED -3. Page
No. 9
h)
Landscaping shall be designed to not obstruct the
view of any exterior door or window from the
street.
i)
Landscaping (trees) shall not be placed directly
under any overhead lighting, which could cause a
loss of light at ground level.
j)
Earthen berms, hedges and /or low walls shall be
provided to screen views of parked vehicles from
adjacent streets.
k)
Backflow preventers, transformers, or other
exposed above ground utilities shall be shown on
the landscape plan(s) and shall be screened with
landscaping and /or a wall.
1) A sufficiently dense tree - planting plan
emphasizing tall growing trees and /or shrubs
shall be designed. Fifty (50) percent (or as
otherwise determined by the Director of Community
Development) of all trees shall be a minimum of
24 inch box size in order to provide screening in
a three (3) to five (5) year time period. All
other trees shall be a minimum 15- gallon in size.
Recommendations regarding planting incorporated
in the environmental document shall be
incorporated to the degree feasible into the
screening plan.
M) Irrigation shall be provided for all permanent
landscaping, as identified in the approved
landscape plan. The Applicant shall be
responsible for maintaining the irrigation system
and all landscaping. The Applicant shall replace
any dead plants and make any necessary repairs to
the irrigation system consistent with the
landscape plan approved for the development.
n) The transformer and cross connection water
control devices shall be shown on the plot plan
and landscaping and irrigation plan and screened
from street view with masonry wall or landscaping
as approved by the Director of Community
Development.
o) All perimeter and /or garden walls shall be
constructed prior to installation of any
sidewalks or concrete slabs.
\ \MOR PR= _SERV \Ciry Share \Commun_ty Development \Everyone \Resolutions and Conditions \cc - 000802 IPD
99 -4 cor- ditions.doc Created on 06/21/00 10 59 PM
- - 0001t2
CED -1. City Council Conditions
CED -2. IPD 99 -4
CED -3. Page No. 10
P) Elevations of proposed hardscape treatment (such
as the building entrance, window and door
treatment) shall be submitted with the final
construction plans.
q) Prior to Final Inspection, the areas to be
landscaped, as shown on the irrigation plan,
shall be landscaped and irrigation system
installed. The City's landscape architect shall
certify in writing that the landscape and
irrigation system was installed in accordance
with the approved Landscape and Irrigation Plans.
r) Riparian vegetation appears to exist at the rear
of the property adjacent to the Arroyo Simi. An
exhibit shall be provided with the landscape plan
to show the relationship of the site to the
adjacent riparian drainage to insure the drainage
will be protected.
s) Any conflicts between light standard locations
and tree locations in the parking lot shall be
resolved.
Offer of Dedication
CDD -28. Prior to issuance of a Zoning Clearance for
construction, the Applicant shall provide an
irrevocable offer of an easement to the City for
maintaining all landscaping of the site adjacent to
Condor Drive. The area referred to shall be all
landscaped portions of the required setback area
adjacent to the public right -of -way along the street
frontages. The Applicant shall be responsible for
maintenance of the aforementioned area as well as the
landscaping within the public right -of -way adjacent to
the project. If the City at it's sole discretion
determines the landscape maintenance is determined to
be unsatisfactory in any of the aforementioned areas,
the City may invoke the offer of dedication and assume
responsibility at the owner's expense for any or all of
the aforementioned areas. The total cost of maintenance
for the areas noted above shall be borne by the
Applicant. The City may at its sole discretion place
the aforementioned areas in a Landscape Maintenance
Assessment District. The Applicant shall record a
covenant to this effect. The Applicant shall maintain
the right to protest the amount and spread of any
proposed assessment, but not the formation of, or
annexation to a maintenance Assessment District.
\ \MGR PR: SERV \City Share \Cc*nmsnity Developner- t\Ev_e_ry_one \-Resolutions and Conditions \c_c- 000802_IPD
99 -4 conditions doc
_ _ Created on 06/2- --- -- 59 AM 000163
CED -1. City Council Conditions
CED -2. IPD 99 -4
CED -3. Page No. 11
FEES
Case Processing Costs
CDD -29. The Applicant shall pay all outstanding case
processing (Planning and Engineering), and all City
legal service fees prior to issuance of a Zoning
Clearance for construction. In addition, the Applicant
shall be required to pay a Condition Compliance
deposit pursuant to the requirements of the most
recently adopted Resolution Establishing Schedule of
Land Development Preliminary Processing Fee Deposits.
Current and Future Park System Contribution
CDD -30. Prior to issuance of Zoning Clearance for
construction, the Applicant shall contribute to the
City of Moorpark, Current and Future Park System
Contribution fund of an amount of $.25 per square foot
for 680 square feet not previously paid to support the
City's current and future park system. The total
required fee is $170.00.
Art and Public Places Contribution
CDD -31. The Applicant shall contribute to the City of Moorpark
Art in Public Places Fund, an amount of $.10 per
square foot for 680 square feet not previously paid of
building area prior to the issuance of a Zoning
Clearance for construction. The Applicant may create a
public art project on or off -site in lieu of paying
the Art in Public Places fee. The artwork must have a
value corresponding to the fee and must receive
approval from the City Council. The total required
fee is $68.00.
Traffic System Management Contribution
CDD -32. Prior to issuance of the first Zoning Clearance for
construction, the permittee shall make a contribution
to the Moorpark Traffic Systems Management Fund of
$.15 per square foot of floor area for 680 square feet
not previously paid to fund Traffic System Management
programs for the total square footage approved for the
project. The total required fee is $102.00.
Citywide Traffic Mitigation Fee
CDD -33. The Applicant shall pay a traffic mitigation fee of
$.50 per gross square foot of building area for 680
\ \MGR PRI
SE-- R V - \-C- ity — Sh- a re - \C- -o- rnmu- n- i-t- y Develoment \Everone \Res olutions and Cond- itions \cc_000802 -- - I-P-
D
- py -
4
conditions.doc Created on 06/21/00 10.59 AM 0 qq G q
CED -1. City Council
CED -2. IPD 99 -4
CED -3. Page No. 12
square feet
and traffic
affected by
is $340.00.
Conditions
not previously paid to fund public street
improvements directly or indirectly
the development. The total required fee
Calleguas Municipal Water District Release
CDD -34. Prior
to issuance of
a Building
Permit, the Applicant
shall
demonstrate by
possession
of a District Release
from
the Calleguas
Municipal
Water District that
arrangements for payment of the construction charge
applicable to the proposed project have been made.
Applicant shall be required to comply with Ventura
County Waterworks Rules and Regulations, including
payment of all applicable fees.
School Assessment Fees
CDD -35. If applicable, prior to the issuance of a Building
Permit, the Applicant shall pay all school assessment
fees levied by the Moorpark Unified School District.
Code Enforcement Costs
CDD -36. The Director of Community Development may declare a
development project that is not in compliance with the
Conditions of Approval or for some other just cause, a
"public nuisance ". The Applicant shall be liable to
the City for any and all costs and expenses to the
City involved in thereafter abating the nuisance and
in obtaining compliance with the Conditions of
Approval or applicable codes. If the Applicant fails
to pay all City costs related to this action, the City
may enact special assessment proceedings against the
parcel of land upon which the nuisance existed
(Municipal Code Section 1.12.080).
Revisions to Plot Plan and Requirement for Lot Line Adjustment
CDD -37. The plot plan shall be revised to reflect the
following:
a), any additional r�Lirements for right -of -way
dedications, if additional right -of -way is
required by the City Council.
-a+b_) Galvanized sheet metal as shown on the material
and colors board which is to be utilized for
\ \MOR PR! SERV\ i�_Share \Coauiun_ty Development \Everyone \Resolutions and Conditions \cc - 000802 IPD
_ - - -- - -- - - -- -- -- - - -- - - -- --- - - - - --
99-4 conditions doc Created on 06/21/00 10:59 AM OO q C:Ps
CED -1. City Council Conditions
CED -2. IPD 99 -4
CED -3. Page No. 13
doors, gates or other purposes shall be painted
to match the building. The colors are subject to
the review and approval of the Director of
Community Development.
b+c) The parking lot shall have no more than ten
(10) percent of the total number of parking
spaces as "compact parking spaces ".
e+d)_ _Additional building articulation and glazing
(spandrel glass) shall be incorporated g—to
the portions of the building fig— comprising the
easterly and westerly elevations that can be seen
from Condor Drive to the satisfaction of the
Director of Community Development. The location
of these additional design elements
shall be based
on a line of site study to determine what
portions 'of the building can be seen from Condor
Drive.
Utilitv Room
CDD -38. A utility room with common access to house all meters
shall be provided within the building.
Skylights
CDD -39. If skylights are to be utilized, the material utilized
shall be designed so as to minimize the light from the
inside of the building to the exterior. Skylights are
subject to the review and approval of the Director of
Community Development
Use of Asbestos
CDD -40. No asbestos pipe or construction materials shall be
used.
Exterior Access
CDD -41. Exterior access ladders are not permitted. There shall
not be any easy exterior access to the roof area, i.e.
ladders, trees, high walls, etc.
Plot Plan Requirements
CDD -42. The following shall be depicted on the plot plans and
shall be subject to approval by the Director of
Community Development:
\ \MOR PRI SERV \City_Share \Community Development \Everyone \Resolutions and Conditions \cc_000802 1
--- - ___ - -- - - -- ---
99 -9 conditions doc Created on 06/21/00 10:59 AM
066166
CED -1. City Council Conditions
CED -2. IPD 99 -4
CED -3. Page No. 14
CDD -43.
a) The transformer and cross connection water
control devices shall be shown on the plot plan
and landscaping and irrigation plan and screened
from street view with masonry wall or
landscaping.
b) All fences and walls shall be shown on the plot
plan and landscaping and irrigation plan.
C) Prior to the issuance of any permits for
development of the site a Fence and Wall plan
depicting the location, type and height of all
proposed fencing shall be submitted for approval
by the Director of Community Development-. The
chainlink fencing proposed at various locations
around the project site shall be "powder coated"
utilizing__ a factory applied finish with a
guarantee of a minimum of twenty (20) years and
shall be black, brown, or green in color as
determined by the Director of Community
Development. The solid wall proposed at various
locations as part of the fencing plan shall be
constructed as _a concrete pour or as a tilt-up to
insure compatibility with the tilt -up
construction of the proposed concrete building.
Bicycle racks or storage facilities shall be provided
on -site.
a) All required loading areas and turning radius
shall be depicted on the plot plan. A 45 -foot
turning radius shall be provided for loading
zones consistent with the AASHO WB -50 design
vehicle.
b) Elevations of proposed hardscape treatment (such
as the building entrance, window and door
treatment) shall be submitted with the final
construction plans.
Parapet Wall Requirement
CDD -44. Roof design and construction shall include a minimum
18 -inch extension of the parapet wall above the
highest point of the flat roof area.
Lighting Plan
CDD -45. For all exterior lighting, a lighting plan consistent
with_ Chapter 17.30 of the Zoning Ordinance shall be
\ \NOR PRI_SERV \City Share \Community Developmen_ \Everyone \Resolutions and Conditions \cc - 000802 I
- --- - ._� _ . -- ---------
- -- — --- --- - - -- - -�_. _.
99-9 cond tior.s doc Created or. 06/21/00 ' =0.59 AM
CED -1. City Council Conditions
CED -2. IPD 99 -4
CED -3. Page No. 15
prepared by an electrical engineer registered in the
State of California and submitted to the Department of
Community Development with the required deposit for
review and approval. The lighting plan shall achieve
the following objectives: avoid interference's with
reasonable use of adjoining properties; minimize on-
site and off -site glare; provide adequate on -site
lighting; limit electroliers height; provide
structures which are compatible with the total design
of the proposed facility and minimize energy
consumption. Ornamental lighting fixtures to
complement the architectural style of the building are
required to the satisfaction of the Director of
Community Development.
The lighting plan shall include the following:
a) A photometric plan showing a point -by -point foot
candle layout to extend a minimum of twenty (20)
feet outside the property lines. Layout plan to
be based on a ten (10) foot grid center. Down
lighting and accent, landscape and building
lighting shall be employed throughout the
project.
b) Maximum overall height of fixtures shall be
twenty -five (25) feet, unless otherwise approved
by the Director of Community Development.
C) Fixtures must possess sharp cut -off qualities
with a maximum of one -foot candle illumination at
or beyond property lines.
d) Energy efficient lighting devices shall be
provided.
e) A minimum of one and a maximum of two -foot candle
illumination with a 1.5 -foot candle average or as
otherwise approved by the Director of Community
Development.
f) No light shall be emitted above the 90 degree or
horizontal plane. No direct light source shall be
visible from the street.
g) Lighting devices in the parking lot shall be
shielded and directed downward to avoid light and
glare on neighboring properties.
\ \MOR PRI SERV \Cit-y Share \Community Develontrent \Everyone \Resolutions and Conditions \cc - 000802 !PD
- -- _ -- --- - -- - - -- - -- -- — --- - -- -- ..._
99 -� conditions.doc Created oa 06/21/OG 10 �9 ��I
0 ()O
CED -1. City Council Conditions
CED -2. IPD 99 -4
CED -3. Page No. 16
h) Lighting devices shall be high enough as to
prohibit anyone on the ground from tampering with
them unless tamper proof fixtures are approved by
the Director of Community Development. All
exterior lighting devices shall be protected by
weather and breakage resistant covers.
i) Lighting at all exterior doors shall be
illuminated with a minimum maintained two foot
candles at ground level.
CDD -46. Prior to the issuance of a Building Permit, a copy of
the lighting plans shall be submitted to the Police
Department for review.
Location of Property Line Walls
CDD -47. All property line walls shall be no further than one
inch from the property line.
Downspouts
CDD -48. No downspouts shall be permitted on the exterior of
the building.
Roof Mounted Equipment
CDD -49. Roof mounted equipment is prohibited, except for
equipment that cannot be mounted on the ground and
approved to be roof mounted by the Director of
Community Development. No roof mounted equipment
(vents, stacks, blowers, air conditioning equipment,
etc.) may extend above any parapet wall, unless
screened on all four sides by view obscuring material
that is an intregal design element of the building.
Prior to the issuance of a Zoning Clearance for
construction, the final design and materials for the
reefroof, screen and location of any roof- mounted
equipment must be approved by the Director of
Community Development. All screening shall be tall
enough to block all ground level views as well as
those from the street and shall be maintained during
the life of the permit. Construction material shall
match the color and material used in the construction
of the buildings. Colors, materials and building
appendages (such as mechanical equipment on the roof,
etc.) of the proposed building shall be compatible
with the existing building and adjacent development
and non - reflective in nature.
\ \MOR ?RI SERV \City Share \Community Develooment \Everyone \Resolutions and Conditions \cc - 000802 IPD
99 -4 conditions doc Created on 06121!00 10. 5 9 AM
CED -l. City Council Conditions
CED -2. IPD 99 -4
CED -3. Page No. 17
Exterior Ground Level Equipment
CDD -50. Any outdoor ground level equipment and storage (such
as loading docks, shelter docks, cooling towers,
generators, etc.) shall be screened from view by a
masonry wall, the design of which shall be approved by
the Director of Community Development or his designee.
The wall shall be constructed of materials and colors
consistent with the main building.
Building Materials and Colors
CDD -51. All exterior building materials and paint colors shall
be as submitted.
Noise Generation Sources
CDD -52. All roof mounted equipment and other noise generation
sources on -site shall be attenuated to 45 decibels
(dBA) at the property line, or to the ambient noise
level at the property line measured at the time of the
occupant request. Prior to the issuance of a Zoning
Clearance for initial occupancy or any subsequent
occupancy, the Director of Community Development may
request that a noise study be submitted for review and
approval which demonstrates that all on -site noise
generation sources will be mitigated to the required
level. The noise study must be prepared by a licensed
acoustical Engineer in accordance with accepted
engineering standards.
Parking
Striping of Spaces
CDD -53. The striping for parking spaces and loading bays shall
be maintained so that it remains clearly visible.
Parking Lot Surface
CDD -54. All parking areas shall be surfaced with asphalt or
concrete and shall include adequate provisions for
drainage, striping and appropriate wheel blocks,
curbs, or posts in parking areas adjacent to
landscaped areas. All parking and loading areas shall
be maintained at all times to insure safe access and
\ \MOR PRI SERV \Cit _Share \Commur.it� Development \Everyone \Reso_utions and Conditions \cc - 000802 1PD
99-9 conditions.doc Created on 06/21/00 10:59—AM
- - - - -- - -- -- - - -- - - --
---- - - - - - -
- -- 0001.70
CED -1.
City
Council Conditions
CED -2.
IPD
99 -4
CED -3.
Page
No. 18
use by employees, public agencies and service
vehicles.
Disposal Areas on Plot Plan
CDD -55. All trash disposal and recycling areas shall be
provided in a location which will not interfere with
circulation, parking or access to the building, and
shall be totally covered and screened with a six foot
high solid wall enclosure with metal gates. The final
design and location of the trash enclosures shall be
subject to review of the Director of Community
Development prior to the issuance of a Zoning
Clearance for construction. Trash areas and recycling
bins shall be depicted on the final construction
plans, the size of which shall be approved by the
Director of Community Development and the City
employee responsible for recycling /solid waste
management programs.
a) Rubbish disposal areas shall include adequate,
accessible and convenient areas for collecting
and loading recyclable materials. The dimensions
of the recycling area shall accommodate
containers consistent with current methods of
collection in the area in which the project is
located.
b) Adequate number of bins or containers shall be
provided to allow for the collection and loading
of recyclable materials generated by the
development. For commercial (general, office, or
retail), developments, space allotment for 2
three cubic yard bins (107" x 84 or 168" x
53.5 "), or a space allotment for one 40 cubic
yard bin (288" x 120 ") and one 3 cubic yard bin
(84" x 53.5) . The intended use for this space is
to hold two side -by -side 3 cubic yard containers
(one for refuse, one for recyclables) , or one 40
cubic yard bin for refuse and one 3 cubic yard
for recyclables.
c) The design of the refuse disposal areas shall be
compatible with the development and the
surrounding area.
d) Disposal areas shall be protected from weather
conditions, which might render collected
recyclable materials unmarketable.
\ \MOR PRI SERV \City Share \Community Develop -rent \Everyone \Resolutions and Conditions \cc - 000802 IPD
-- -- - - -- - - --- - - - - - -- - - -- -- - - --
- 9 condi-ions.doc Created on 0'0 /21/00 10 59 AM
- - - -- ®O 17JL
CED -1. City Council Conditions
CED -2. IPD 99 -4
CED -3. Page No. 19
e) Driveways or travel aisles shall provide
unobstructed access for collection vehicles and
personnel, and provide the minimum vertical
clearance of 30 feet, or other specified
clearance required by the collection methods and
vehicles utilized by the hauler..
f) A sign, approved by the Director of Community
Development, clearly identifying all recycling
and solid waste collection and loading areas, and
the materials accepted therein shall be posted
adjacent to all points of access to the recycling
areas.
g) Refuse disposal areas shall not be located in any
area required by the Municipal Code to be
constructed or maintained as unencumbered,
according to fire and other applicable building
and /or public safety.laws.
h) Recycling area(s) shall be located so they are
convenient and adjacent to regular refuse
collection areas.
i) The design of the refuse and recycling enclosures
shall be subject to the approval of the Director
of Community Development, prior to the issuance
of a Zoning Clearance for construction. All
rubbish disposal areas and recycling areas shall
be screened with a six -foot high, solid wall
enclosure with metal gates.
i) In cases where space for
bins is required (107"
53.5 "), the opening of
must be at least 84 inc
three cubic yard bin).
applies to the amount of
the gate is fully opened.
2 three cubic yard
x 84 or 168" x
any bin enclosure
-ies (the size of a
This requirement
space exposed when
ii) Each refuse \recycling enclosure shall have
gates and should be designed with cane bolts
to secure the gates when in the open
position.
iii) Space allocation for rubbish and recycling
enclosures shall be designed in a manner
that complies with the equal access
requirements of Title 24 and the American
Disabilities Act.
\ \NOR PRI —SERV \City Sha e \Communi_y Development \Everyone \Resolutions and Conditions \cc - 000802 IPD
99 -9 �onditior_s_doc Created or 06 /21/00 10 _59 AM
_ _ OOOJ 2
CED -1.
City Council Conditions
CED -2.
IPD 99 -4
CED -3.
Page No.
20
iv)
The enclosure
shall have a
separate indirect
pedestrian access way,
which does not
require doors
or gates.
Franchise
Hauler
CDD -56.
The franchised hauler
designated
to service this
location
will be determined prior to
construction.
Recycling Plan
CDD -57. Prior to issuance of an Occupancy Permit, a Waste
Reduction and Recycling Plan shall be submitted to the
Community Development Department prior to occupancy of
the building. The plan shall include a designated
building manager, who is responsible for initiating
on -site waste materials recycling programs. This shall
include the acquiring of storage bins for the
separation of recyclable materials and coordination
and maintenance of a curbside pickup schedule.
Waste Management Education Program
CDD -58. The on -site building manager or designee will conduct
a routine waste management education program on -site
to alert employees to any new developments or
requirements for solid waste management. This measure
shall be coordinated through the City's Solid Waste
Management Department.
Enforcement of Vehicle Codes
CDD -59. Prior to Occupancy, the Applicant shall request the
City to enforce appropriate vehicle codes on subject
property as permitted by Vehicle Code Section 21107.7.
Unconditional Will -Serve Letter
CDD -60. Prior to the issuance of a Building Permit, an
"Unconditional Will Serve Letter" for water and sewer
service will be obtained from the Ventura County
Waterworks District No. 1.
Water Service Connection
CD_D -61. At the time water service connection is made for each
project, cross connection control devices shall be
installed for the water system in accordance with the
requirements of the Ventura County Environmental
Health Department.
\ \MOR PRZ SDRV \City Sh re \Comrnunity Developme :it \Everyone\Reso_1_utio_n_s__ and C_onditi_on_s_ \c_c__- _0_00802 I_P_D__
--- -- -
99 -4 Condit ons doc C -e-a- ted on 06/21/00 10 59 AM
- -- - - - -- - - - - - - -- -- - -- - -- 00J173
CED -l. City Council Conditions
CED -2. IPD 99 -4
CED -3. Page No. 21
CDD -62. Prior to the issuance of a building permit the
applicant shall obtain approval of a Vector Control
Plan from the City.
CDD -63. Condition Compliance Cost: Prior to the issuance of a
Zoning Clearance for construction, the applicant,
permittee,___ or successors in interest, shall also
submit to the Department of Community Development a
fee to cover _costs incurred by the City for Condition
Com liance review of this project.
CITY ENGINEER CONDITIONS
PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF A GRADING PERMIT, THE FOLLOWING
CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED:
General:
+ -TThe Applicant shall demonstrate legal access to the parcel
to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
Grading:
�'�2.The Applicant shall submit to the City of Moorpark for
review and approval, a rough grading plan, consistent with the
approved preliminary grading plan, prepared by a Registered
Civil Engineer, shall enter into an agreement with the City of
Moorpark to complete public improvements and shall post
sufficient surety guaranteeing the construction of all
improvements.
GED= TConcurrent with submittal of the rough grading plan an
erosion control plan shall be submitted to the City for review
and approval by the City Engineer. The design shall include
measures for hydroseeding on all graded areas within 30 days of
completion of grading unless otherwise approved by the City
Engineer. Reclaimed water shall be used for dust control during
grading, if available from Waterworks District No. 1 at the time
of grading permit approval.
GED = rProject proposes 100 cu. yds. of cut and 11,500 cu. yds.
of fill. On all required rough grading plans where the total on-
site borrow and fill yardages differ by one thousand cubic yards
(1000 cu yd) or more, plans for handling the import /export shall
be part of the rough grading plan.
a) The import /export plan shall show the quantity of
import /export, location of borrow /stockpile
sites, temporary and final grading of the site,
height of fill /depth of cut, visibility of the
\ \N.OR PRI S RV \Cit Sra e \Community Developmen_ \Everyone \Resolutions and Conditions \cc - 000802 IPD
- - -- ------------------ - - -- --------- - - ------- - - - - --- - - - - - -- -- - - -- _ ..- - --
99_9 cond tions.doc Created or. 05/21/00 =0 59 AM
-- — -- - - - -- - - - -- -
CED -1. City Council Conditions
CED -2. !PD 99 -4
CED -3. Page No. 22
site from public roads and lands, vegetation and
screening for sites located within the City of
Moorpark.
b) Approximately 13,000 cubic yards of soil is
anticipated to be imported. Unanticipated off -
site import /export operations requiring an excess
of one hundred (100) total truck loads or one
thousand cubic yards, whichever is less, shall
require Council approval prior to the
commencement of hauling or staged grading
operations. A haul route is to be submitted to
the City Engineer for review and approval.
c) If the borrow /fill site(s) are within the City
limits, a grading plan for such sites, showing
the before and after condition, shall also be
shown. Borrow /fill sites outside, but within 2
miles of the City limits, shall be approved by
the Director of Community Development.
GED -T On the required rough grading plans that require
import /export of more than 100 truckloads or one thousand cubic
yards, whichever is less, the following information shall be
made a part of the rough grading plan: haul routes, hours of
hauling, numbers and frequency of trucks and other information
necessary to define hauling impacts. It is anticipated that the
majority, if not all of the import, will come from outside the
City limits. The approved haul route shall be from the 118
Freeway Princeton Avenue/ Los Angeles Avenue off -ramp to Condor
Drive. Soil imported along other haul routes, exceeding 1,000
cubic yards or 100 truckloads, shall be approved in advance by
the City Manager. Additional surety for the cleaning and /or
repair of the streets may be required as directed by the City
Engineer.
GE9 6.All requests for staged grading must be submitted in
writing to the City Engineer for review and approval by the City
Council.
CED 7.Temporary stockpiling of soil in excess of one thousand
(1000) cubic yards shall require approval of the City Council.
Lesser amounts may be administratively approved by the Director
of Community Development and City Engineer subject to the
following:
a) The height of the stockpile may not exceed five
(5) feet.
b) Side slopes shall not exceed 3:1.
\ \MOR PRI SERV \Cit x —� Em Share \Communit Develo eat \Ever - one \Reolutions and Conditions \cc - 000802 IPD
- -- - -- - —
---------- - ----- -- - - -- -- - - - - -- - -- — -- -------- - - - -
-- ._ s. - - - - - - -- - - - -- - - -- - -- - -- -- — - --
99-4 cond- ions.doc Created on 06/21/00 10:55 AM ��
CED -l. City Council Conditions
CED -2. IPD 99 -4
CED -3. Page No. 23
c) Duration of the temporary stockpile shall not
exceed six (6) months.
d) Applicant shall submit a surety equal to the cost
of export and disposal plus ten (10) percent.
GE D -8. Temporary irrigation, hydroseeding and erosion control
measures shall be implemented on all temporary grading.
Temporary grading is defined to be any grading partially
completed and any disturbance of existing natural conditions due
to construction activity. These measures will apply to temporary
grading activity that remains or is anticipated to remain
unfinished or undisturbed in its altered condition for a period
of time greater than thirty (30) days or the beginning of the
rainy season whichever comes first.
GLAD =9 . The maximum gradient for any slope shall not exceed a 2:1
slope inclination except where special circumstances exist. In
the case of special circumstances where steeper slopes are
warranted, plans will be reviewed by a certified soil engineer
and their recommendations will be subject to the review and
approval of the City Engineer and the Director of Community
Development.
r-- 19.A11 graded slopes shall be planted in a timely manner
meeting the approval of the Director of Community Development
with groundcover, trees and shrubs that will stabilize slopes
and minimize erosion.
GE D!! -All development areas and lots shall be designed so that
surface drainage is collected by the on -site storm drain system
prior to connecting to the existing 30" CMP storm drain at the
southeast corner of the property.
ED 12—.So as to reduce debris from entering sidewalk and
streets, the approved grading plan shall show a slough wall,
approximately 18 inches high, with curb outlet drainage to be
constructed behind the back of the sidewalk where slopes
exceeding 4 feet in height are adjacent to sidewalk. The
applicant shall use the City's standard slough wall detail
during the design and construction. All material for the
construction of the wall shall be approved by the City Engineer
and Director of Community Development.
CE^nTThe final grading plan shall be in substantial compliance
with the approved rough grading plan. The City Engineer and
Director of Community Development shall make the determination
as to substantial compliance with the approved rough grading
plan. The City Engineer may administratively approve minor
\ \N_OR PRI SERV \City Share \Cormnuni y Developmen_ \Everyone \Resolutions and Conditions \cc - 000802 IPD
--- - - --- --- - — - - -- - - -- — - -- -
99-4 conditions doc Created or 06/21/00 10:59 AM
0001'76
CED -1. City Council Conditions
CED -2. IPD 99 -4
CED -3. Page No. 24
changes from the rough grading plan. Minor changes are defined
as:
a}e) changes in elevation of three (3) feet or less
from the rough grading plan;
b_}f)------ changes in total borrow /fill quantities which
do not exceed one thousand cubic yards (1000
yd3);
- e+g)_ additional import /export quantities not
exceeding one thousand cubic yards (1000 yd3);
d-}h) changes which cause no adverse impacts to slope
stability, drainage, and erosion control; and,
e+i) changes which, in the view of the Director of
Community Development, do not result in any
adverse impact on aesthetics or viewshed.
Geotechnical /Geology Review
GED TrThe applicant shall submit to the City of Moorpark for
review and approval, detailed Geotechnical Engineering Report
certified by a California Registered Civil Engineer. The
geotechnical engineering report shall include an investigation
with regard to liquefaction, expansive soils, and seismic
safety. In addition, the report shall discuss the contents of
the soils as to the presence or absence of any hazardous waste
or other contaminants in the soils.
Note: Review of the geotechnical engineering report,
by the City's Geotechnical Engineer, is required. The
applicant shall reimburse the City for all costs
including the City's administrative fee for this
review.
GED 15-;-All recommendations included in the approved geotechnical
engineering report shall be implemented during project design,
grading, and construction in accordance with the approved
project. The City's geotechnical consultant shall review all
plans for conformance with the soils engineer's recommendations.
Prior to the commencement of grading plan check, the applicant's
geotechnical engineer shall sign the plans confirming that the
grading plans incorporate the recommendations of the approved
soils report(s).
Storm Water Runoff and Flood Control Planning:
GED 167 The applicant shall submit to the City for review and
approval, drainage plans, hydrologic and hydraulic calculations
\ \MOR_PRI SERV \City S_nare \Community Develo2ment\Everyone \Resolutions and Conditions \cc- 000802_IPD
99 -� condit_ons.aoc Created on 06/21/OC 10:59 A-M
0®01'7'7
CED -1. City Council Conditions
CED -2. IPD 99 -4
CED -3. Page No. 25
prepared by a California Registered Civil Engineer; shall enter
into an agreement with the City to complete public improvements
and shall post sufficient surety guaranteeing the construction
of all improvements.
The plans shall depict all on -site and off -site
drainage structures required by the City.
The drainage plans and calculations shall indicate the
following conditions before and after development:
Quantities of water, water flow rates, major water
courses, drainage areas and patterns, diversions,
collection systems, flood hazard areas, sumps, sump
locations, detention facilities, and drainage courses.
Hydrology shall be per the current Ventura County
Standards except as follows:
-All storm drains shall carry a 10 -year
frequency storm;
b+k) _ All catch basins shall carry a 10 -year storm;
c}-1) All catch basins in a sump condition shall be
sized such that depth of water at intake shall
equal the depth of the approach flows;
d}m) All culverts shall carry a 100 -year frequency
storm;
e-*n) - -- _Drainage facilities shall be provided such that
surface flows are intercepted and contained in a
storm drain system prior to entering collector or
secondary roadways;
}o) Under a 10 -year frequency storm, local,
residential and private streets shall have one
dry travel lane available on interior residential
streets. Collector streets shall have a minimum
of one dry travel lane in each direction;
q+p) Drainage to adjacent parcels shall not be
increased or concentrated by this development.
All drainage measures necessary to mitigate storm
water flows shall be provided by the Applicant;
4}q) _All drainage grates shall be designed and
constructed with provisions to provide adequate
bicycle safety to the satisfaction of the City
Engineer;
\ \MCR PRI SERV \Citx
°9 -- 9 Share \Community Develop en\Evryone \Resolutions and Conditions \cc - 000802 —IPD - - - m - - - -- — -------- --
conditions.doc Created on 06/21/00 0_ AM
- 1 59 0 00 78
CED -1. City Council Conditions
CED -2. IPD 99 -4
CED -3. Page No. 26
I+ r) If the land to be occupied is in an area of
special flood hazard, the Applicant shall notify
all potential buyers in writing of this hazard
condition. The grading plan shall also show
contours indicating the 50- and 100 -year flood
levels.
--}s) All flows from brow ditches, ribbon gutters and
similar devices shall be deposited into the storm
drain system prior to entering streets or other
approved locations. If necessary, the storm drain
system shall be extended beyond the public right -
of -way through easements to eliminate surface
flow between parcels. Both storm drain and
easements outside the right -of -way are to be
maintained by the owners unless otherwise
approved by the City Council.
-k}t) Concrete drainage structures shall be tan
colored concrete, as approved by the Director of
Community Development, and to the extent possible
shall incorporate natural structure and landscape
to reduce their visibility.
I}u) Drainage for the development shall be designed
and installed with all necessary appurtenances to
safely contain and convey storm flows to their
final point of discharge, subject to review and
approval of the City Engineer.
m}v)__ _A hydraulic /hydrology study shall be prepared
which analyzes the hydraulic capacity of the
drainage system, with and without the storm drain
system for the proposed development. The
Applicant shall make any downstream improvements,
required by Ventura County Flood Control and the
City of Moorpark, to support the proposed
development.
'=�}w)______Improvements shall be constructed to detain
drainage on -site when the drainage amount is
between the ten -year and fifty -year storm event.
A rainfall intensity Zone K shall be utilized in
the design unless an alternate design intensity
is approved by the City Engineer.
C -:The Applicant shall demonstrate that surface drainage
from the site shall not drain over the sidewalk or driveways.
\ \NOR PRI_SZRV \City Share\ Con- nunityDevelopmen_ \Everyone \Resolutions and Conditions \cc - 000802 IPD
- -- -- _
99-4 condit.ions__doc Created_ or.__06 /21/00_ =0 59 P.N. 000179
CED -l. City Council
CED -2. IPD 99 -4
CED -3. Page No. 27
GF9 18
�� ��The Applicant
within the development
protections can be put
Engineer:
Conditions
shall demonstrate for each building pad
area that the following restrictions and
in place to the satisfaction of the City
a+x) Adequate protection from a 100 -year frequency
storm.
b+y) Feasible access during a 50 -year frequency
storm.
e*z) _Hydrology calculations shall be per current
Ventura County Standards.
b}aa) _All structures proposed within the 100 -year f
flood zone shall be elevated at least one foot
above the 100 -year flood level.
GED 19—The Applicant shall provide for all necessary on -site and
off -site storm drain facilities required by the City to
accommodate upstream and on -site flows. Facilities, as shown on
existing drainage studies and approved by the City, shall be
delineated on the final drainage plans. Either on -site retention
basins or storm water acceptance deeds from off -site property
owners must be specified. These facilities (if applicable) must
also be acceptable to the Ventura County Flood Control District.
National Pollutant Discharqe Elimination System ( NPDES
GDS .Prior to the issuance of any construction /grading permit
and /or the commencement of any clearing, grading or excavation,
the Applicant /owner shall submit a Stormwater Pollution Control
Plan (SWPCP) , on the form provided by the City for the review
and approval of the City Engineer.
rED 2-1—.The SWPCP shall be
accordance with requirements
Stormwater Quality Management
CAS063339.
developed and implemented in
of the Ventura Countywide
Program, NPDES Permit No.
CAB -z.The SWPCP shall identify potential pollutant sources that
may affect the quality of discharges to stormwater and shall
include the design and placement of recommended. Best Management
Practices (BMPs) to effectively prohibit the entry of pollutants
from the construction site into the storm drain system during
construction.
CEB-23-.The Applicant shall obtain a permit from the State Water
Resources Control Board for "All storm water discharges
associated with a construction activity where clearing, grading,
and excavation results in land disturbances of five or more
\ \MOR PRI SERV \City _Share \Community Development \Everyone\ Resolutions - and Conditions \cc - 000802 -IPD
99 -9 conditions.doc Created on 06/21/0010:59 A-M
CED -1.
City
Council Conditions
CED -2.
IPD
99 -4
CED -3.
Page
No. 28
acres." The Applicant /owner shall submit a Notice of Intent
(NOI) to the California State Water Resources Control Board,
Storm Water Permit Unit in accordance with the NPDES
Construction General Permit (No. CASQ00002): Waste Discharge
Requirements for Discharges of Storm Water Runoff Associated
with Construction Activities. The Applicant /owner shall comply
with all additional requirements of this General Permit
including preparation of a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan
(SWPPP). The Applicant shall submit a Notice of Intent (NOI) to
the City Engineers office as proof of permit application.
+GS9 —The Applicant shall also comply with NPDES objectives as
outlined in the "Stormwater Pollution Control Guidelines for
Construction Sites." This handout is available at the City
Engineers office and a copy will be attached to the approved
grading permit.
GED - TDevelopment shall be undertaken in accordance with
conditions and requirements of the Ventura Countywide Stormwater
Quality Management Program, NPDES Permit No. CAS063339.
�� -2 The project construction plans shall note and incorporate
that the contractor shall comply to the "California Storm Water
Best Management Practice Handbooks" - Best Management Practices
(BMPs) applicable to the development for the review and approval
of the City Engineer. Said requirements shall include the
following:
a) All on -site storm drain inlets shall be labeled
"Don't Dump - Drains to Arroyo ".
b) No outdoor vehicle maintenance shall be allowed.
C) All common area property shall be maintenance
free of litter and debris.
d) All on -site storm drains shall be cleaned, using
approved methods, at least twice a year, once
immediately prior to October 1, the rainy season,
and once in January.
e) All common sidewalks, walkways, and parking areas
shall be swept regularly to prevent the
accumulation of litter and debris from entering
the storm drain. No cleaning agent must be
discharged into a storm drain system. If any
cleaning agent or degreaser is used, washwater
shall not be discharged to the storm drain but
shall be discharged to the sanitary sewer.
Discharges to the sanitary sewer are subject to
\ \MOR PRI SERV\C_t-y S:Sare \CommunitV Develoorrent \Everyone \Resolutions and Conditions \cc - 000802 IPD
_ - - -- - - --- -- - --- --
99-5 conditions.doc Created on 06/21/00 10 59 AM
000181
CED -1. City Council Conditions
CED -2. IPD 99 -4
CED -3. Page No. 29
the review and approval of the County Waterworks
District No. 1.
f) If required by the BMP's, grease interceptors
shall be installed in all on -site and off -site
storm drain inlets. In the event, such grease
traps are required to be installed in any on -site
inlet; the Applicant shall provide the City with
a maintenance program for such devices. The
owner /manager of the development shall maintain
such grease interceptors in a manner consistent
with requirements of the Maintenance Program.
Street Improvement Requirements:
GED - 277-The Applicant shall submit to the City for review and
approval, street improvement plans prepared by a Registered
Civil Engineer; and shall post sufficient surety guaranteeing
the construction of the improvements.
GED Z8 7"Publicly dedicated streets shall conform to the design
requirements of the Ventura County Road Standards (most recent
revision) .
GED 27"The street improvements shall include concrete curb and
gutter, parkways, street lights, and signing, striping, interim
striping and traffic control, paving, and any necessary
transitions, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. All
driveway locations shall be approved by the City Engineer and
the Director of Community Development. The Applicant shall
dedicate any additional right -of -way necessary to make all of
the required improvements.
Condor Drive
a) Driveways shall be designed in accordance with
the latest Ventura County Road Standards.
b) The plans shall provide for removal and
replacement of all damaged sections of curb and
gutter.
GE9-3 The Applicant shall provide slope easements for road
maintenance purposes only along all roads where the top of cut
plus 5 feet or the toe of fill plus 5 feet is beyond the
dedicated right -of -way. Said slope easements shall include the
area covered by the cut slope plus 5 feet and fill slope plus 5
feet.
\ \MOR PRI SERV \City Share \Comm unity Development \Everyone \Resolutions and Conditions \cc - 000802 IPD
- - - -- — _ - -- - _ -- - --- - - --
99-4 condit ons doc Created on 06/21/00 10:59 AM
000182
CED -1. City Council Conditions
CED -2. IPD 99 -4
CED -3. Page No. 30
rGED -34:;--Streetlights shall be provided on the improvement plans
per Ventura County Standards and as approved by the City
Engineer.
C- ED -32;-The Applicant shall pay all energy costs associated with
public street lighting for a period of one year from the
acceptance of the street improvements.
rF-33;--Above ground obstructions (utility cabinets, mailboxes,
etc.) are to be placed within the right -of -way landscaping areas
whenever possible. When above ground obstructions are to be
placed within the sidewalk, a minimum five (5) foot clear
sidewalk width must be provided around the obstruction.
Cabinets with screen planting to approved by Public Works,
Community Development and City Engineering Departments.
G 34-;--Additional surety shall be provided for resurfacing
and /or repair of the full width portion of Condor Drive located
adjacent to the project. The surety shall be used to secure the
curb replacement and overlay or slurry of the street, as a
result of damage from construction work or utility trenching.
The City may require restoration of the streets before occupancy
of the building. Surety will be returned upon the City Engineer
accepting the condition of the street.
x"-35 -The Applicant shall indicate in writing to the City the
disposition of any wells that may exist within the project. If
any wells are proposed to be abandoned, or if they are abandoned
and have not been properly sealed, they must be destroyed or
abandoned per Ventura County Ordinance No. 2372 or Ordinance No.
3991 and per Division of Oil and Gas requirements. Permits for
any well reuse (if applicable) shall conform with Reuse Permit
procedures administered by the County Water Resources
Development Department.
GF;9-3 The Applicant shall comply with all pertinent County of
Ventura Public Works Department water and sewer connection
regulations. These measures shall be implemented by the County
of Ventura Public Works Department (Waterworks District No. 1).
GED -3:7-Ail proposed utility lines within and immediately
adjacent to the project site (as determined by the Director of
Community Development and the City Engineer) shall be placed
underground to the nearest off -site utility pole. All existing
utilities shall also be underground to the nearest off -site
utility pole with the exception of 66 KVA or larger power lines.
This requirement for undergrounding includes all aboveground
power poles on the project site as well as those along the
frontage of the site. The Applicant shall indicate in writing
\ \MOR PRI SERV \City Share \Community 00 10 59 Ai Developn_ent \Everyone \Resolutions and Conditions \cc - 000802 IPD
99 -� conditions aoc Crea_ed on 06/21/�1
- - - - - - - -- ®® 183
CED -l. City Council Conditions
CED -2. IPD 99 -4
CED -3. Page No. 31
how this condition will be satisfied. Any above grade utility
fixtures shall be placed adjacent to landscaped areas and
screened on three sides.
GED final design and location of all walls and fences,
streetscape elements, urban landscaping are subject to the
approval of the Director of Community Development.
D 39:In accordance with Business and Professions Code 8771 the
street improvement plans shall, provide for a surveyors
statement on the plans, certifying that all recorded monuments
in the construction area have been located and tied out or will
be protected in place during construction.
GED- 40-Any right -of -way acquisition necessary to complete the
required improvements will be acquired by the Applicant at his
expense.
GED -41-.-The Applicant shall submit wall and landscaping plans
showing that provisions have been taken to provide for and
maintain proper sight distances. All fences, walls and other
structures over six (6) feet high are to be submitted to and
approved by the Director of Community Development.
GE9 427"The Applicant shall offer to dedicate access easements to
the City over all private streets to provide access for all
governmental agencies providing public safety, health and
welfare.
GED- =,-The Applicant shall offer to dedicate to the City public
use, and all right -of -way easements for public streets.
GE,9 44-The Applicant shall post sufficient surety guaranteeing
completion of all site improvements within the development and
other off -site improvements required by the conditions as
described herein (i.e., grading, street improvements, storm
drain improvements, landscaping, fencing, bridges, etc.) or
which require removal (i.e., access -ways, temporary debris
basins, etc.) in a form acceptable to the City.
GF;9 -4z5The Applicant shall make a special contribution to the
City representing the Applicants pro -rata share of the cost of
improvements at the following intersection:
Los Angeles Ave. /Spring Road (estimated cost of
improvement $150,000)
The actual contribution (pro -rata share) shall be
based upon the additional traffic added to the
intersection. The Applicants Traffic Engineer shall
\ \MOR PRI SERV \City Share\C Tj�nity- Development \Eve one \Resolutions and Conditions \cc - 000802 IPD
99-4 conditions do Created on 06/21/0010 59 -AM
CED -1. City Council Conditions
CED -2. IPD 99 -4
CED -3. Page No. 32
provide the City Engineer an estimate of the projected
traffic numbers for calculation of the pro -rata share.
DURING GRADING, THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL APPLY:
CED -47. Grading may occur during the rainy season from October
15th to April 15th subject to installation of erosion
control facilities. Erosion control measures shall be in
place and functional between October 15th and April 15th.
CED -48. Prior to any work being conducted within the State,
County, or City right -of -way, the Applicant shall obtain
all necessary encroachment permits from the appropriate
Agencies.
CED -49. During site preparation and construction, the contractor
shall minimize disturbance of natural groundcover on the
project site until such activity is required for grading
and construction purposes.
CED -50. During clearing, grading, earth moving or excavation
operations, dust shall be controlled by regular watering.
In addition the following measures shall apply:
a) Water all site access roads and material
excavated or graded on -site or off -site to
prevent excessive amounts of dust. Watering shall
occur a minimum of at least two times daily,
preferably in the late morning and after the
completion of work for the day. Additional
watering for dust control shall occur as directed
by the City. The grading plan shall indicate the
number of water trucks that will be available for
dust control at each phase of grading.
b) Cease all clearing, grading,
excavation operations during
winds (greater than 15 mph
hour). The contractor shall ma
the Air Pollution Control
meteorologist for current
average wind speeds.
earth moving, or
periods of high
averaged over one
intain contact with
District (APCD)
information about
c) Water or securely cover all material transported
off -site and on -site to prevent excessive amounts
of dust.
d) Keep all grading and construction equipment on or
near the site, until these activities are
completed.
\ \MOR_PRI SERV \City Share \Community Development \Everyone \Resolutions and Conditions \cc - 000802 IPD
99_9 conditions.doc Created on 06/21/00 10:59 AM
CED -1. City Council Conditions
CED -2. IPD 99 -4
CED -3. Page No. 33
e) Facemasks shall be used by all employees involved
in grading or excavation operations during dry
periods to reduce inhalation of dust, which may
contain the fungus, which causes San Joaquin
Valley Fever.
f) The area disturbed by clearing, grading, earth
moving, or excavation operations shall be
minimized to prevent excessive dust generation.
g) Wash off heavy -duty construction vehicles before
they leave the site.
h) All trucks that will haul excavated or graded
material off site shall comply with the State
Vehicle Code Section 23114, with special
attention to Sections 23114 (b) (2) (F) , (e) (2) and
(e) (4) as amended, regarding the prevention of
such material spilling onto public streets and
roads.
CED -51. After clearing, grading, earth moving, or excavation
operations, and during construction activities, fugitive
dust emissions should be controlled using the following
procedures:
a) Apply non - hazardous chemical stabilizers to all
inactive portions of the construction site. When
appropriate, seed exposed surfaces with a fast -
growing, soil - binding plant to reduce wind
erosion and its contribution to local particulate
levels.
b) Periodically, or as
Engineer, sweep public
the site to remove
material transported
vehicular activities,
may have accumul�
activities.
directed by the City
streets in the vicinity of
silt (i.e., fine earth
from the site by wind,
water runoff, etc.) which
ated from construction
CED -52. All diesel engines used in construction equipment shall
use reformulated diesel fuel.
CED -53. During smog season (May- October) the City shall order
that construction cease during Stage III alerts to
minimize the number of vehicles and equipment operating,
lower ozone levels and protect equipment operators from
excessive smog levels. The City, at its discretion, may
also limit construction during Stage II alerts.
\ \MOR PRI SERV \City Share \Comer. unity_ Development \Everyone \Resolutions and Conditions \cc - 000802 IPD
o
99 -4 conditins doc Created on 06/21/00 10:59 T.M
CED -1. City Council Conditions
CED -2. IPD 99 -4
CED -3. Page No. 34
CED -54. Construction activities shall be limited to between the
following hours: a) 7:00 a.m. and 7:00 p.m. Monday
through Friday, and b) 9:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. Saturday.
Construction work on Saturdays will require payment of a
premium for City inspection services, and may be further
restricted or prohibited should the City receive
complaints from adjacent property owners. No construction
work is to be done on Sundays, pursuant to Section
15.26.010 of the Municipal Code.
CED -55. Truck noise from hauling operations shall be minimized
through establishing hauling routes that avoid
residential areas and requiring that "Engine Exhaust
Brakes" not be used along the haul route within the City.
The hauling plan must be identified as part of the
grading plan and shall be approved by the City Engineer.
CED -56. The Applicant shall ensure that construction equipment is
fitted with modern sound - reduction equipment.
CED -57. Equipment not in use for more than ten minutes shall be
turned off.
CED -58. If any hazardous waste is encountered during the
construction of this project, all work shall be
immediately stopped and the Ventura County Environmental
Health Department, the Fire Department, the Sheriff's
Department, and the City Construction Observer shall be
notified immediately. Work shall not proceed until
clearance has been issued by all of these agencies.
CED -59. The Applicant shall utilize all prudent and reasonable
measures (including installation of a 6 -foot high chain
link fence around the construction sites or provision of
a full time licensed security guard) to prevent
unauthorized persons from entering the work site at any
time and to protect the public from accidents and injury.
CED -60. Equipment engines shall be maintained in good condition
and in proper tune as set forth in manufacturers
specifications.
CED -61. Backfill of any pipe or conduit shall be in 4" fully
compacted layers unless otherwise specified by the City
Engineer.
CED -62. Soil testing for trench compaction is to be performed on
all trenches for pipe or conduit placement. The interval
of testing shall be less than once every 4 feet of lift
and 100 lineal feet of trench excavated.
\\MOR PR._SERV \Ci y Share \Co- nmunit Development \Every ne \Resolutions and Conditions \cc - 000802 IPD
------------ eL1 - -.._. ------- -- - - - -- ------ - - - - -- ------- -- - - -- —
99-9 conditions.doc Created on 06/21/00 10:59 AM
000187
CED -1. City Council Conditions
CED -2. IPD 99 -4
CED -3. Page No. 35
CED -63. Observe a 15 -mile per hour speed limit for the
construction area.
CED -64. During site preparation and construction, construct
temporary storm water diversion structures per City of
Moorpark standards.
PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A ZONING CLEARANCE FOR A BUILDING PERMIT
THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED:
CED -65. Prior to issuance of a Building Permit, the Applicant
shall pay to the City the Los Angeles Avenue Area of
Contribution (AOC) Fee, which shall be the dollar amount
in effect at the time the fee is paid.
If previous payment of this contribution can be
demonstrated, to the City's satisfaction upon
concurrence of the City Manager, the Applicant would
not have to pay the AOC fee.
CED -66. Prior to issuance of a Building Permit, all habitable
structures shall be designed to current UBC requirements
or the City approved geotechnical report requirements for
the project, whichever standard is most restrictive.
PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY THE FOLLOWING
CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED:
CED -67. Construction of Condor Drive improvements and /or repairs
shall be completed to the satisfaction of the City.
CED -68. If directed by the City, the Applicant shall have
repaired, overlayed or slurried that portion of Condor
Drive adjacent the development. The repairs, curb
replacement, parkways, sidewalks, and overlay or slurry
of the streets, as a result of damage from construction
work or utility trenching shall be along the entire
length of the project including transitions unless
otherwise approved and shall be completed to the
satisfaction of the City Engineer.
PRIOR TO ACCEPTANCE OF PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS AND BOND REDUCTION
AND /OR EXONERATION, THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED:
CED -69. Reproducible centerline tie sheets shall be submitted to
the City Engineer's office. (Not applicable)
CED -70. Sufficient surety in a form and amount acceptable to the
City guaranteeing the public improvements shall be
provided, and shall remain in place for one year
following acceptance by the City.
\ \110R PRI SERV\ City_ Share \Commuritx Development \Everyone \Resolutions and Conditions \cc - 000802 IPD
99 -9 conditions.doc Created on 06/21/00 10:59 AM 000 Q
CED -1. City Council Conditions
CED -2. IPD 99 -4
CED -3. Page No. 36
CED -71. If necessary, the Applicant shall file for a time
extension with the City Engineer's office at least six
weeks in advance of expiration of the agreement to
construct subdivision improvements. The fees required
will be in conformance with the applicable ordinance
section.
CED -72. Original "as built" plans will be certified by the
Applicant's registered Civil Engineer and submitted with
two sets of blue prints to the City Engineer's office.
Although grading plans may have been submitted for
checking and construction on sheets larger than 22" x
36 ", they must be resubmitted as "record drawings" in a
series of 22" x 36" mylars (made with proper overlaps)
with a title block on each sheet. Submission of "as
built" plans is required before a final inspection will
be scheduled.
FIRE DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS
VFD -1. Where two -way traffic and off - street parking on both
sides occur, a 25 -foot street width shall be provided.
VFD -2. Access roads shall not exceed 15% grade.
VFD -3. All driveways shall have a minimum vertical clearance
of 13 feet 6 inches (13'6 ").
VFD -4. Gates used to control vehicular access shall be
designed as required by the Fire Department Gate
Guidelines. Design criteria includes, stacking method
of gate control, clear widths, and knox box systems
for secured gates. Gate plan details shall be
submitted to the Fire Prevention Division for review
and approval.
VFD -5. Prior to construction, the Applicant shall submit two
(2) site plans to the Fire District for the review and
approval of the location of fire lanes. The fire lanes
shall be posted in accordance with California Vehicle
Code, Section 22500.1 and Article 10 of the Uniform
Fire Code prior to occupancy.
VFD -6. Prior to combustible construction, all weather access
road /driveway suitable for use by a 20 ton Fire
District vehicle shall be installed.
VFD -7. Approved turnaround areas or easements for fire
apparatus shall be provided where access road is 150
feet or farther from the main thoroughfare.
\ \MOR PRI SERV \City Share \Community Development \-Everyone \Resolutions and Conditions \cc - 000802 IPD
-- — - ---- -- -- -- - --- ..- - - ---- - - - - --
99 =9 conditicns.doc Created on 06 /21/00 10 59 AM 000169
CED -1. City Council Conditions
CED -2. IPD 99 -4
CED -3. Page No. 37
VFD -8. Building Plans for all A,E,H and I occupancies shall
be submitted to the Fire District for plan check.
VFD -9.
Address numbers, a minimum of 6 inches (6 ") high,
shall be installed prior to occupancy, shall be of
contrasting color to the background, and shall be
readily visible at night. Where structures are set
back more than 250 feet (250') from the street, larger
numbers will be required so that they are
distinguishable from the street. In the event, the
structure(s) is not visible from the street; the
address number(s) shall be posted adjacent to the
driveway entrance.
VFD -10.
Prior to construction, the Applicant shall submit
plans to the Fire District for approval of the
location of hydrants, and show existing hydrants
within 300 feet of the development.
VFD -11.
Fire hydrants shall be installed and in service prior
to combustible construction and shall conform to the
minimum standard of the Moorpark Water Works Manual.
VFD -12.
Each hydrant shall be a 6 -inch wet barrel design and
shall have (2) 4 inch and (1) 2 1/2 inch outlet(s).
VFD -13.
The required fire flow shall be achieved at no less
than 20 -psi residual pressure.
VFD -14.
Fire hydrants shall be spaced 300 feet on center and
so located that no structure will be farther than 150
feet from any one hydrant.
VFD -15.
Fire hydrants shall be set back in from the curb face
24 inches on center.
a) The minimum fire flow required shall be
determined by the type of building construction,
proximity to other structures, fire walls, and
fire protection devices provided, as specified by
the 1994 Uniform Fire Code Appendix III -A and
adopted Amendments. Given the present plans and
information, the required fire flow is
approximately 3000 gallons per minute at 20 psi.
The Applicant shall verify that the water
purveyor can provide the required volume at the
project.
b) This building is to be protected by an automatic
sprinkler system; plans shall be submitted, with
\ \MOR PR I SIRV \City Share \Community Development \Everyone \Resolutions and Conditions \cc - 000802 IPD
- - - - - - -- -- - - - - - - -- ----- -- - - -- - -- —
99 -4 conditions doc Created on 06/21/00 _0_59 AN ^ ®O 9 O
CED -1. City Council Conditions
CED -2. IPD 99 -4
CED -3. Page No. 38
fees for plan review and approval, to the Fire
District for review.
c) Plans for any fire alarm system shall be
submitted with fees for plan review and approval
to the Fire District for plan check.
d) Fire extinguishers shall be installed in
accordance with National Fire Protection
Association Pamphlet #10. The placement of
extinguishers shall be subject to review and
approval by the Fire District.
e) All grass or brush exposing any structures) to
fire hazards shall be cleared for a distance of
100 feet prior to framing, according to the
Ventura County Fire Protection Ordinance.
f) Industrial trash dumpsters and containers with an
individual capacity of 1.5 cubic yards or greater
shall not be stored or placed within 5 feet of
openings, combustible walls, or combustible roof
eave lines unless protected by approved automatic
fire sprinklers. (Uniform Fire Code, Article 11.)
g) The Applicant shall obtain and comply with the
provisions of VCFD Form #126 Requirements For
Construction prior to obtaining a Building Permit
for any new structures or additions to existing
structures.
POLICE DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Construction Site Security Provisions. All new construction,
shall comply with the following security measures until the
utilities have been released by the City:
MPD -1. Perimeter lighting shall be installed at a minimum of
150 -foot intervals and at a height not less than 15
feet from the ground. The light source used shall have
• minimum light output of 2000 lumens, be protected by
• vandalism resistant cover, and be lighted during the
hours of darkness. Additional lighting shall be
required if the construction site exceeds four acres
in area. Lighting shall be installed at locations
designated by the Chief of Police.
MPD -2. In addition to perimeter lighting previously
described, one of the following shall be used:
\ \90R ?RI SERV \City Snare - Community- Development \Ever ne \Resolutions and Conditions \cc - 000802 IPD
99 -4 conditi.ons.doc Crea ed on 06/21/00 10.55 Ati1
- -- - - - -- -- - - - - -- 0 ® J 1
CED -1. City Council Conditions
CED -2. IPD 99 -4
CED -3. Page No. 39
a) Fencing, not less than six feet in height, which is
designed to preclude human intrusion, shall be
installed along the perimeter boundaries of the
construction site.
b) A uniformed security guard, licensed according to
Business and Professions Code, Chapter 11, shall be
utilized to continually patrol the construction site
during the hours when construction work has ceased.
c) Construction equipment, tools and materials will be
properly secured to prevent theft during non - working
hours.
d) All computers and appliances (microwave ovens,
dishwashers, trash compactors, etc.) Will be properly
secured to prevent theft prior to installation during
non - working hours. All serial numbers will be recorded
for identification purposes.
e) If an alarm system is used, it should be wired to all
exterior doors, windows, roof vents or other roof
openings where access may be made.
MPD -16. Security Guard. After occupancy, the Applicant shall
provide a security guard on -site, if required by the
Police Department.
MPD -17. Exterior Access. There shall not be any easy exterior
access to the roof area, i.e. ladders, trees, high
walls, etc.
MPD -18. Windows and Sliding Glass Doors.
The following requirements must be met for windows and
sliding glass doors:
a) Except as otherwise provided by this chapter, all
operable exterior windows and sliding glass doors
shall comply with the tests set forth in these
conditions.
b) Louvered windows shall not be used, when a portion of
the window is less than 12 feet vertically or 6 feet
horizontally from an accessible surface or any
adjoining roof, balcony, landing, stair tread,
platform, or similar structure.
MPD -19. Garage -type Doors. All garage doors shall conform to
the following standards:
\ \MCR PR- SERV \City Share \Community Development \Everyone \Resolutions and Conditions \cc - 000802 - -Z PD
- -- --- -- - --
99-9 conditions doc Created on 06/21/00 10:59 AM
-- -- - -- - - - -- - - - -- - -- - -- - - - - --
OOOJL92
CED -1. City Council Conditions
CED -2. IPD 99 -4
CED -3. Page No. 40
a) Wood doors shall have panels a minimum of 5/16 inch in
thickness with the locking hardware being attached to
the support framing.
b) Aluminum doors shall be a minimum thickness of .0215
inches and riveted together a minimum of eighteen (18)
inches on center along the outside seams. There shall
be a full width horizontal beam attached to the main
door structure which shall meet the pilot, or
pedestrian access, door framing within three (3)
inches of the strike area of the pilot or pedestrian
access door.
c) Fiberglass doors shall have panels a minimum density
of six ounces per square foot from the bottom of the
door to a height of seven (7) feet. Panels above seven
(7) feet and panels shall have a density not less that
five- (5) ounce per square foot.
d) Doors utilizing a cylinder lock shall have a minimum
five -pin tumbler operation with the locking bar or
bolt extending into the receiving guide a minimum of
one (1) inch.
e) Doors that exceed 16 feet in width, but do not exceed
19 feet in width, shall have the following options as
to locking devices:
1. Two lock - receiving points, or one garage -door-
type lide bolt may be used if mounted no higher
that 26 inches from the bottom of the door;
2. A single bolt may be used if placed in the
center of the door with the locking point
located either at the floor or door frame
header;
3. Torsion spring counter balance type hardware
may be used if such hardware substantially
complies with the requirements of this chapter.
4. Doors secured by electrical operation shall
have a keyed switch to open the door when in a
closed position, or shall have a signal locking
device to open the door.
5. Doors with slide bolt assemblies shall have
frames of a minimum of .120 inches in
thickness, with a minimum bolt diameter of one -
half inch and protrude at least 1 '_l inches into
the receiving guide. A bolt diameter of 3/8
\ \MOR PR=
- SERV\ Ci tShare \Comrnuni_Develop, \Everyone \Resolutions and Conditions \cc - 000802 D
_ - - -- - - - - - -_ _ y _ - - -- — -- - - - --- -IP-
99-9 conditions doc Created on 06/21/00 10:59 AM 0 " . JL ^ 3
CED -1. City Council Conditions
CED -2. IPD 99 -4
CED -3. Page No. 41
inch may be used in a residential building. The
slide bolt shall be attached to the door with
non - removable bolts from the outside. Rivets
shall not be used to attach slide bolt
assemblies.
6. Padlock (s) used with exterior mounted slide
bolts) shall have a hardened steel shackle
locking both at heel and toe and a minimum five
pin tumbler operation with non - removable key
when in an unlocked position. Padlock(s) used
with interior mounted slide bolts(s) shall have
a hardened steel shackle with a minimum four -
pin tumbler operation.
Landscaping
MPD -20. Landscaping shall not cover any exterior door or
window. Landscaping shall not reduce the visibility
of passing motorists view of activities in the parking
area.
MPD -21. Landscaping at entrances /exits or at any intersection
will not block or screen the view of a seated driver
from another moving vehicle or pedestrian.
MPD -22. Landscaping (trees) will not be placed directly under
any overhead lighting, which could cause a loss of
light at ground level.
Special Building Provisions - Commercial.
MPD -23. Swinging exterior glass doors, wood or metal doors
with glass panels, solid wood or metal doors shall be
constructed or protected as follows:
a) Wood doors shall be of solid core construction with a
minimum thickness of 1 3/4 inches. Wood panel doors
with panels less than one inch thick shall be covered
on the inside with a minimum sixteen U.S. gauge sheet
steel, or its equivalent, which is to be attached with
screws on minimum six -inch centers. Hollow steel doors
shall be of a minimum sixteen U.S. gauge and have
sufficient reinforcement to maintain the designed
thickness of the door when any locking device is
installed; such reinforcement being able to restrict
collapsing of the door around any locking device.
b) Except when double cylinder dead bolts are utilized,
any glazing in exterior doors or within 48 inches of
\ \MOR FRI SERV\ City Share \Community Developmer - -:�\ Everyone \Resolutions _and Conditions \cc _000802 IPD
99-9 conditions doc Created on 06 /21/00 10:59 AM
000194
CED -1. City Council Conditions
CED -2. IPD 99 -4
CED -3. Page No. 42
any door - locking mechanism shall be constructed or
protected as follows:
1. Fully tempered glass or rated burglary
resistant glazing; or
2. Iron or steel grills of at least 1/8 inch
material with a minimum two -inch mesh secured
on the inside of the glazing may be utilized;
or
3. The glazing shall be covered with iron bars of
a least one -half inch round or one inch by 1/4
inch flat steel material, spaced not more than
five inches apart, secured on the inside of the
glazing;
C) All swinging exterior wood and steel doors shall be
equipped as follows:
d) A single or double door shall be equipped with a
double cylinder dead bolt. The bolt shall have a
minimum projection of one inch and be constructed so
as to repel cutting tool attack. The dead bolt shall
have an embedment of at least 3/4 inch into the strike
receiving the projected bolt. The cylinder shall have
a cylinder guard, a minimum of five pin tumblers, and
shall be connected to the inner portion of the lock by
connecting screws of at least 1/4 inch in diameter.
The provisions of the preceding paragraph do not apply
where:
1. Panic hardware is required; or
2. An equivalent device is approved by the
enforcing authority.
e) Double doors shall be equipped as follows:
1. The inactive leaf of double door(s) shall be
equipped with metal flush bolts having a
minimum embedment of 5/8 inch into the head and
threshold of the doorframe.
2. Double doors shall have an astragal constructed
of steel a minimum of .125 thick, which will
cover the opening between the doors. The
astragal shall be a minimum of two inches wide,
and extend a minimum of one inch beyond the
edge of the door to which it is attached. The
astragal shall be attached to the outside of
\ \MOR PRI
-- -- — S ER-- V - \-- Citx -- - nt Develom yone \Resolutions and Conditions \cc - 00082 —IPD u— p
dit
99 '_ons doc Created o C
00 10:59 -- - II
_4 conn 6/21/ AEI
-- - - - -- - - - - - -- -- - - - - - - -- - -- 00019
CED -1. City Council Conditions
CED -2. IPD 99 -4
CED -3. Page No. 43
the active door by means of welding or with
non - removable bolts spaced apart on not more
that ten -inch centers. The door to which such
an astragal is attached must be determined by
the fire safety codes adopted by the enforcing
authority.
3. Every single or double exterior door equipped
with lever - handled locking mechanism hardware
shall have an approved handicapped- accessible
threshold complying with provisions of Title 24
of the Uniform Building Code (as amended from
time to time) beneath the door. The opening
between the threshold and the door shall be
secured in a manner approved by the Crime
Prevention Bureau of the Moorpark Police
Department designed to prevent the passing of
rigid materials or mechanical devices between
the door and the threshold for the purposes of
unlocking the door from the interior side.
4. Aluminum frame swinging doors shall be equipped
as follows:
a. The jamb on all aluminum frame swinging
doors shall be so constructed or protected
to prevent pealing of the door frame around
the strike and withstand 1600 pounds of
pressure in both a vertical distance of
three inches and a horizontal distance of
one inch each side of the strike, so as to
prevent violation of the strike.
b. A single or double door shall be equipped
with a double cylinder dead bolt with a bolt
projection exceeding one inch, or a hook
shaped or expanding dog bolt that engages
the strike sufficiently to prevent
spreading. The dead bolt lock shall have a
minimum of five pin tumblers and a cylinder
guard.
c. Panic hardware, whenever required by the
Uniform Building Code or Title 19,
California Administrative Code, shall be
installed as follows:
i. Panic hardware shall contain a minimum of
two locking points on each door; or
\ \MOR_PRI SERV \City Saare \Corununit Development\ Everyone\ Resolutions and Conditions \cc_000802 IPD
conditions.doc Created on C6 /21/00 10:59 AM
-- - -- -- - - - -- - - - -- - -- - -- -- - - -- —
000196
CED -l. City Council Conditions
CED -2. IPD 99 -4
CED -3. Page No. 44
ii. On single doors, panic hardware may
have one locking point, which is not to be
located at either the top or bottom rails
of the doorframe. The door shall have an
astragal constructed of steel .125 inch
thick, which shall be attached with non -
removable bolts to the outside of the
door. The astragal shall extend a minimum
of six inches vertically above and below
the latch of the panic hardware. The
astragal shall be a minimum of two inches
wide and extend a minimum of one inch
beyond the edge of the door to which it is
attached.
iii. Double doors
shall have an
doors at their
close the open
interfere with
door.
containing panic hardware
astragal attached to the
meeting point, which will
ing between them, but not
the operation of either
f) Horizontal sliding doors shall be equipped with a
metal guide track at top and bottom and a cylinder
lock and /or padlock with a hardened steel shackle
which locks at both heel and toe, and a minimum five
pin tumbler operation with non - removable key when in
an unlocked position. The bottom track shall be so
designed that the door cannot be lifted from the track
when the door is in a locked position.
g) In office buildings (multiple occupancy), all entrance
doors to individual office suites shall meet the
construction and locking requirements for exterior
doors.
h) Windows shall be deemed accessible if less than twelve
feet above ground. Accessible windows and all exterior
transoms having a pane exceeding 96 square inches in
an area with the smallest dimension exceeding six
inches and not visible from a public or private
vehicular access way shall be protected in the
following manner:
i) Fully tempered glass or burglary resistant
glazing; or
ii) The following window barriers may be used but
shall be secured with non - removable bolts:
\ \MOR PRI SERV \City Share \Com.unity Development \Everyone \Resolutions and Conditions \cc - 000802 IPD
- - ---- - -- -- -- -_ - -- .. — - -- --- - - -- -- -- -- - --- ._... —
99-9 condi� ions doc Created on 0-6-/ _2_1__/__0_0_ 10.59_AM 000197
CED -1. City Council Conditions
CED -2. IPD 99 -4
CED -3. Page No. 45
iii) Inside or outside iron bars of at least ❑ inch
round or one inch by 1/4 inch flat steel
material, spaced not more than five inches apart
and securely fastened; or
iv) Inside or outside iron or steel grills of at least
1/8 inch material with not more than a two -inch
mesh and securely fastened.
i) If a side or rear window is of the type that can be
opened, it shall, where applicable, be secured on the
inside with either a slide bar, bolt, crossbar,
auxiliary locking device, and /or padlock with hardened
steel shackle, a minimum four pin tumbler operation.
j) The protective bars or grills shall not interfere with
the operation of opening windows if such windows are
required to be openable by the Uniform Building Code.
MPD -24. Roof openings shall be equipped as follows:
a) All skylights on the roof of any building or premises
used for business purposes shall be provided with:
1. Rated burglary resistant glazing; or
2. Iron bars of at least ❑ inch round or one inch
by 1/4 inch flat steel material under the
skylight and securely fastened; or
3. A steel grill of at least 1/8 inch material
with a maximum two -inch mesh under the skylight
and securely fastened.
4. All hatchway openings on the roof of any
building or premises used for business purposes
shall be secured as follows:
a. If the hatchway is of wooden material, it
shall be covered on the inside with at least
sixteen U.S. gauge sheet metal, or its
equivalent, attached with screws.
b. The hatchway shall be secured from the
inside with slide bar or slide bolts.
c. Outside hinges on all hatchway openings
shall be provided with non - removable pins
when using pin -type hinges.
b) All air duct or air vent openings exceeding 96 square
inches on the roof or exterior walls of any building
or premises used for business purposes shall be
\ \MCR PRI_SERV\ City _Share \Connunitx Development \Everyone \Resolutions and Conditions \cc - 000802 IPD
'9--_
9-4 conditions doc Created on_06 /21/00 10:59 P.M 0001
CED -1. City Council Conditions
CED -2. IPD 99 -4
CED -3. Page No. 46
secured by Covering the same with either of the
following:
i) Iron bars of at least ❑ inch round or one inch by
1/4 inch flat steel material spaced no more than
five inches apart and securely fastened; or
ii) Iron or steel grills of at least 1/8 inch
material with a maximum two -inch mesh and
securely fastened.
iii) If the barrier is on the outside, it shall be
secured with bolts, which are non - removable from
the exterior.
iv) The above (i and ii) must not interfere with
venting requirements creating a potentially
hazardous condition to health and safety or
conflict with the provisions of the Uniform
Building Code or Title 19, California
Administrative Code.
MPD -25. Permanently affixed ladders leading to roofs shall be
fully enclosed with sheet metal to a height of ten
feet. This covering shall be locked against the ladder
with a casehardened hasp, secured with non - removable
screws or bolts. Hinges on the cover will be provided
with non - removable pins when using pin -type hinges. If
a padlock is used, it shall have a hardened steel
shackle, locking at both heel and toe, and a minimum
five -pin tumbler operation with non - removable key when
in an unlocked position.
The following standards shall apply to lighting,
address identification and parking areas:
a) The address number of every commercial building shall
be illuminated during the hours of darkness so that it
shall be easily visible from the street. The numerals
in these numbers shall be no less than six inches in
height and be of a color contrasting to the
background. In addition, any business, which affords
vehicular access to the rear through any driveway,
alleyway or parking lot, shall also display the same
numbers on the rear of the building.
b) All exterior commercial doors, during the hours of
darkness, shall be illuminated with a minimum of two -
foot candles of light. All exterior bulbs shall be
protected by weather and vandalism resistant covers.
\ \'4OR PRI SERV \City Share \Community— Development \Everyone \Resolutions and Conditions \cc - 000802 !PD
99-9 conditions doc Created on 06/21/00 10:59 AM
000199
CED -1. City Council Conditions
CED -2. IPD 99 -4
CED -3. Page No. 47
c) Open parking lots, and access thereto, providing more
than ten parking spaces and for use by the general
public, shall be provided with a maintained minimum of
one foot candle of light on the parking surface from
dusk until the termination of business every operating
day.
MPD -26. Mechanical Parking Gates - Emergency Override Control
Devices Required:
a) Except as otherwise provided in this section, owners
or operators of controlled vehicle parking areas and
private streets which use mechanical parking gates to
control motor vehicle ingress or egress shall install
and maintain an emergency override control device on
each gate. Said device shall be a master key- operated
type switch, which shall comply with City Police
Department standards. Provisions of this Section shall
not apply to a vehicle parking area or private street
when emergency or other public service vehicles have
immediate access to said parking area or private
street without delay. Except as otherwise provided in
this section, emergency override control devices shall
be required for all said mechanical parking gates.
Additional Security Requirements.
MPD -27. Exterior Trash Enclosures:
The Exterior Trash Enclosures shall include locking
hardware which allows for the locking of the
enclosures during both business and non - business
hours. Unlocked trash enclosures provide an attractive
hiding place for the storage of merchandise during
employee theft, particularly those enclosures near
employee parking stalls. Unlocked trash enclosures
provide attractive targets for unwelcome individuals
who search through trash dumpsters for salvage items.
Additionally, any key or combination to a lock should
be given to the company providing trash service.
Waterworks District No. 1
WWD -l. The applicant shall comply with the Waterworks District
No. 1 Rules and Regulations and subsequent additions or
revisions, thereto, and pay applicable fees and construct
needed improvements prior to receiving sewer service.
\ \MOR PRI SERV \Cit _Share \Comm uni� Develop -nent \Everyone \Res- o l—uti o- ns -- - a—nd --C- o n- d - i— ti- o-n- s \- c-c - - - - 00- 0-- 8 - 0-- 2 -- I- P-D
'99-4 c- - o--n- d-ii- tion _s - -d- ox cCreated on 06/21/00 -
10:59 _AM