Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAGENDA REPORT 2019 0123 CC SPC ITEM 05ACITY OF MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA City Council Meeting of 01.23.2019 ACTION Decided on 4 Districts with at-large elected Mayor. Directed revised maps return on 2.6.19. BY M. Benson A. Public Hearing to Receive Comments on the Transition to District-Based Elections and Drafts of Proposed Council District Maps and Sequencing of Elections. Staff Recommendation: 1) Hold the third public hearing to receive public comments regarding the transition of the City from at-large elections to district-based elections for City Council Members, the content of the draft Council district maps, and the proposed sequencing of elections; and 2) Provide direction to staff concerning a preferred map(s), any changes the Council may wish to incorporate into the preferred map(s), or request additional maps Item: 5.A. MOORPARK CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT TO: Honorable City Council FROM: Kevin G. Ennis, City Attorney DATE: 01/23/2019 Special Meeting SUBJECT: Public Hearing to Receive Comments on the Transition to District-Based Elections and Drafts of Proposed Council District Maps and Sequencing of Elections SUMMARY The City of Moorpark has undertaken a process of considering whether to transition from a system of at-large elections to a system of district elections for electing its Council Members. This is the third of five scheduled public hearings required under the California Voting Rights Act (“CVRA”) for general law cities to convert to district-based elections. As of the date this staff report was published, the City has received nineteen draft maps from the public identifying proposed Council districts. Additionally, five draft maps were prepared by the City’s professional demographer. The public’s maps, along with the maps prepared by the demographer and summary tables are included as Attachment 1. Proposed election sequencing information is shown on each map in Attachment 1. Correspondence received that is in addition to the map submittals is included as Attachment 2. This is the first public hearing where the City Council will receive public comments on the proposed district maps and sequencing schedule. The City Council may express a preference for one or more maps, direct the City’s demographer to change one or more of the maps, or request the preparation of additional maps. BACKGROUND As the Council is aware, the City of Moorpark currently elects its City Council Members through an “at-large” election system in which each Council Member can reside anywhere in the City and is elected by the voters of the entire City to provide citywide representation. This methodology for election of Council members has been in place since City incorporation in 1983. The office of Mayor is a separate, directly elected office with a term of office of two years, as established by voter approval of Measure D at an election on November 8, 1988. Item: 5.A. 12853-0027\2259115v1.doc 1 Honorable City Council 01/23/2019 Special Meeting Page 2 On August 29, 2018, the City received a letter from Kevin Shenkman, an attorney of the law firm of Shenkman & Hughes, challenging the City's current election method and asserting that the City’s at-large election system violates the CVRA. (Elections Code Sections 14025 through 14032) Mr. Shenkman’s letter threatens litigation if the City declines to voluntarily convert to district-based elections for Council Members. The City has entered into a tolling agreement with Mr. Shenkman that precludes him from filing a lawsuit under the CVRA until April 9, 2019. On October 11, 2018, the City Council adopted a Resolution of Intent to transition from at-large to district-based elections for the election of Council Members. Adoption of the Resolution of Intent did not commit the City to any one course of action, but instead set forth a timeline and process by which the City would conduct public hearings on the proposal and prepare and review draft Council district maps. On November 13 and December 12, 2018, the City held the first two public hearings to receive comments regarding the transition of the City from at-large elections to district-based elections for Council Members and the composition of the City Council districts. City staff and the City’s contracted demographer answered questions regarding district-based elections and heard from residents regarding their preferences and concerns about potential district maps. Residents were invited to prepare their own district maps for consideration by the City Council. Minutes from these meetings have been included in Attachment 3. DRAFT MAPS As part of the process of transitioning to district-based elections, the City retained Doug Johnson of National Demographics Corporation (NDC) to analyze the City’s demographic and voting data and to draft proposed district maps for the election of Council Members by district. Applying districting principles under the CVRA, Mr. Johnson prepared five maps, three of which divide the City into four Council districts plus an at-large elected Mayor, and two of which divide the City into five Council districts with a Mayor chosen from among the Council. Mr. Johnson believes that each of these five maps balances the City’s population roughly equally between each of the districts, as required by the CVRA. These five maps that were prepared by the City’s demographer were published on the City’s website on January 16, 2019, consistent with the minimum seven-day publishing requirement in Section 10010(a)(2) of the Elections Code. In addition, the City received nineteen maps from the public: three five-district maps, fifteen four-district maps, and one three-district map. Some of these maps, however, are not population balanced and could be susceptible to 2 Honorable City Council 01/23/2019 Special Meeting Page 3 challenge under the CVRA. The three-district map would not provide a sufficient number of Council Members under California law. All draft maps of the proposed boundaries of the districts received from NDC and the public are currently published on the City’s website and include the population and proposed election sequencing information, and these files and all of the public hearing agenda records are also available in the Office of the City Clerk, and can be emailed or printed upon request. If the City Council revises a draft map (or maps) at or following the public hearing on January 23, 2019, that map (or maps) must be published and made available to the public for at least seven days before being adopted. The next public hearing on District maps and sequencing is scheduled for February 6, 2019, and per the schedule would need to include introduction of an ordinance. The final public hearing required to implement district-based elections is scheduled for March 6, 2019, and that meeting is planned to include ordinance adoption. The seven-day deadline for publishing maps prior to the City Council March 6, 2019 meeting is February 27, 2019. Mr. Johnson will present all of the draft maps included in Attachment 1 to the City Council and explain the strengths and weaknesses of each. Districting Process Effective January 1, 2017, Elections Code Section 10010 established a new process for switching to district-based elections. The process includes a series of public hearings at which the public is invited to provide input regarding the composition of the districts. The purpose of the first two public hearings is to receive comments regarding the transition of the City from at-large elections for Council Members to district-based elections for Council Members, the time frame for this transition, and the criteria and factors that go into the drawing of maps of single-member voting districts. In addition to maps prepared by residents, a professional demographer with extensive experience in CVRA and drafting Council districts has drawn five maps. In creating the draft maps of the proposed boundaries of the districts, the demographer considered the public comments received by the City during its first two public hearings. After the draft maps were drawn, the City made all twenty- four draft maps available to the public. Each draft map identifies the potential sequence of elections for that map, if the City Council Members will be elected at different times to provide for staggered terms of office. Each draft map also identifies whether the position of Mayor will continue to be elected at-large, under the current practice approved by voters over thirty years ago, or will be selected from one of five Council Members elected from each district. 3 Honorable City Council 01/23/2019 Special Meeting Page 4 The proposed schedule for the transition from at-large elections to district-based elections for City Council requires five public hearings between November 13, 2018 and the proposed date of March 6, 2019 for the adoption of the ordinance establishing district-based elections (scheduled items in italics are proposed to be completed at this hearing): • October 11, 2018 Adoption of proposed resolution stating the City’s intent to transition to district-based elections • November 13, 2018 Public Hearing No. 1 • December 12, 2018 Public Hearing No. 2 • January 16, 2019 Draft maps of proposed Council districts and sequencing available • January 23, 2019 Public Hearing No. 3 • February 6, 2019 Public Hearing No. 4 and introduction of ordinance • March 6, 2019 Adoption of proposed ordinance to elect Council Members by districts (ordinance would be effective 30 days after adoption) Public comments on the transition and on the proposed district maps are very important and public participation at the public hearings is encouraged. FISCAL IMPACT The City through its City Attorney retained National Demographics Corporation to analyze the demographic data and voting data of the City and draft proposed district maps for the election of Council Members by district. If a claim for the attorney fees is made by Mr. Shenkman, the maximum potential liability to the City under Elections Code Section 10010 is $30,000 if the City ultimately transitions to district-based elections within the agreed upon timeline. The legal and contract services costs including the anticipated $30,000 payment were budgeted by the City Council at its meeting of November 7, 2018, through the adoption of a budget amendment resolution. Staff costs to administer the process are in addition to the previously approved budget amendment. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the City Council: 1. Hold the third public hearing to receive public comments regarding the transition of the City from at-large elections to district-based elections for City Council Members, the content of the draft Council district maps, and the proposed sequencing of elections; and 4 Honorable City Council 01/23/2019 Special Meeting Page 5 2. Provide direction to staff concerning a preferred map(s), any changes the Council may wish to incorporate into the preferred map(s), or request additional maps. ATTACHMENTS 1. Draft Maps (including Demographic and Voting Information for Draft Maps and Summary Tables) 2. Correspondence received in addition to Draft Maps 3. Minutes of 11/13/2018 and 12/12/2018 Community Meeting Public Hearings 5       Draft District Maps  Submitted to the City      January 16, 2019  6 NDC Moorpark Public Map Submitter Comments 1/16/2019 Map 401 - Jeni Rose-Dullaghan, Robert Jacobs & Patricia Jacobs (each submitted the same map) Jeni Rose-Dullaghan: I think this map makes sense because . . . .it divides the city into a NW [2], a NE [1], a SE [3 ] and a Central [4] district which uses natural dividing lines to accomplish the re-districting and is a relatively simple while still achieving our goals. Robert Jacobs: I think this works fairly for all. Patricia Jacobs: This seems to be a rather simple, straightforward solution to a pressing issue. Map 402 – Stephanie Anderson Districts based on geographical location. In so far as possible, neighborhoods are kept together. Map 403 – Janine Atkins – not population balanced No comment submitted Map 304 – T. Duck – 3-district map, not population balanced No comments submitted Map 405 – Ute Van Dam – not population balanced No comments submitted Map 406 – Mark Van Dam – not population balanced No comments submitted Map 407 – Bruce Hamous No comments submitted Map 508 – David Delgadillo Five district plan with Ctr central SE NE SW and N and W North and West Rural areas. Preserves one dominant Hispanic district and keeps college community intact, while preserving new developed areas together and existing communities in south east and west connected. Map 409 – Stephanie Anderson – not population balanced (after fixing non-contiguous areas) East-West Districts Map 410 – Stephanie Anderson North-South Orientation 7 NDC Moorpark Public Map Submitter Comments 1/16/2019 Map 411 – NDC Map that enables voters to decide which Councilmembers have earned re-election, rather than the lines dictating that one or more will leave the Council at the end of this term Map 412 – NDC Building from map 402, 412 is as compact a map as possible that also follows freeways, railroads and/or the river for almost every border in this quadrant-focused map. Map 413 – NDC Regionally-oriented map with a western, eastern, center-north and center-south districts. Map 514 – NDC Map that, with the exception of District 1, enables voters to decide which Councilmembers have earned re-election, rather than the lines dictating that one or more will leave the Council at the end of this term Map 515 – NDC Highly compact five-district map following major roads, railroads and rivers for most district borders. Map 416 – Kristine Reynolds– not population balanced No comments submitted Map 417 – Jeff Reynolds– not population balanced No comments submitted Map 418 – Mark Van Dam No comments submitted Map 519 – Janet Murphy & Dawn Mortara – “5 districts version 1” I think this map makes sense because: All 5 districts have some LA Ave. connection, some connection to Arroyo Simi, and a connection to some major business center in town, some bigger connection than others (to businesses), but all have SOME business connection. Three of five districts have some connection to Tierra Rejada Rd., which is as many as could be expected given other city geography. Two (maybe three) districts have connection to TR Valley greenbelt. District 2 preserves community of interest (COI) of Campus Park/Varsity Park Estates/Campus Hills and Villa del Arroyo Mobile Home Park while adding contiguous spur to LA Ave. and major business center. Dist. 3 preserves COI of downtown historical Latino neighborhoods, while including Virginia Colony and major central business centers including High St. Dist. 4 largely preserves COI of Peach Hill/Steeple Hill and Serenata (Carlsberg) while having several major business centers. Dist. 5 preserves a large chunk of Mountain Meadows north of TR Rd. plus some to S of TR Rd to make numbers 8 NDC Moorpark Public Map Submitter Comments 1/16/2019 fit, plus some major business areas. Dist 1 preserve the newer gated communities together but also wraps around to include the remainder of Mt. Meadows that could not otherwise fit in another district (mostly S of TR Rd.). It also includes most businesses west of TR/Gabbert Rd. No consideration at all for where existing council members live. Done just for COI and to give broad rep from many districts for multiple primary issues. Map 520 – Janet Murphy & Dawn Mortara – “5 districts version 2” I think this map makes sense because of the same main reasons as our Version 1 five-district map: all five districts connect to LA Ave, Arroyo Simi, and major business centers. Also, communities of interest reflect historical trends in Moorpark since incorporation, as did Version 1 of five-district map. However this version 2 is slightly adjusted from version 1 to reflect a way to include Population ID area 38 with Peach Hill/Steeple Hill area of town since we asked people who live there and they said they consider themselves more part of Peach Hill than Mt. Meadows, where Version 1 map had them. Please read the version 1 explanation for the rest of the info, along with the email that accompanied this submittal. Map 421 – Janet Murphy & Dawn Mortara– “4 districts version 1” – not population balanced I think this map makes sense because the overall goal already mentioned (when discussing 5 districts) of having each district touch LA Ave, the Arroyo, and some part of a main business district is still part of this and is honored by this version, as well. Map 422 – Janet Murphy & Dawn Mortara – “4 districts version 2” I think this map makes sense because the overall goal already mentioned (when discussing 5 districts and above) of having each district touch LA Ave, the Arroyo, and some part of a main business district is still part of this and is honored by this version, as well. Map 423 – Janet Murphy & Dawn Mortara– “4 districts version 3” "I think this map makes sense because the overall goal already mentioned (when discussing 5 districts and above) of having each district touch LA Ave, the Arroyo, and some part of a main business district is still part of this and is honored by this version, as well. Map 424 – Steve Kueny No comments submitted 9 Plan Name Submitter #Districts Pop. Dev. Most-Latino Pairs 401 multiple 4 5.42% 49.7 % 2 in Dl; 2 in D2 402 Stephanie Anderson 4 3 .38% 46 % 2 in D 1; 2 in D 2 403 Janine Atkins 4 19.01 % n/a 2inD3 304 T. Duck 3 106.87% n/a n/a - 405 Ute Van Dam 4 78.16 % n/a 2 in Dl; 2 in D2 406 Mark Van Dam 4 16.93 % n/a 2 in Dl; 2 in D2 407 Bruce Hamous 4 2.42 % 49 .5% 4in Dl 508 David Delgadillo 5 4.94% 49 % 3inD1;2inD2 409 Stephanie Anderson 4 15.77 % n/a 4in Dl 410 Stephanie Anderson 4 8.77 % 33 % 2 in Dl; 2 in D2 411 NDC 4 6.71 % 46 % None 412 NDC 4 6.38 % 47 % 2 in Dl; 2 in D2 413 NDC 4 4.11 % 45 % 2in Dl 514 NDC 5 3.08% 55% 2 in Dl 515 NDC 5 8.51 % 51 % 3 in D 1; 2 in D 2 416 Kristine Reynolds 4 107.73% n/a 2 in Dl; 2 in D2 417 Jeff Reynolds 4 51.19 % n/a 2 in Dl; 2 in D2 418 Mark Van Dam 4 4.69 % 49.6 % 2 in Dl; 2 in D2 519 Janet Murphy & Dawn Mortara 5 3 .72% 57 % 3 in Dl; 2 in D2 520 Janet Murphy & Dawn Mortara 5 8.11 % 51% 3 in Dl; 2 in D2 - 421 Janet Murphy & Dawn Mortara 4 10.51 % n/a 2 in Dl; 2 in D2 422 Janet Murphy & Dawn Mortara 4 4 .61 % 53 % 3 in Dl -- 423 Janet Murphy & Dawn Mortara 4 6.66 % 48 % 2in Dl 424 Steve Kueny 4 3 .21 % 46 % 2 in Dl; 2 in D2 10 11 District 1 2 3 Total Total Pop 11,209 5,475 17,737 34,421 Deviation from ideal -265 -5,999 6,263 12,262 % Deviation -2 31% -52 28% 54 58% 106 87% % Hisp 29% 72% 20% 31% % NH White 57% 22% 68% 57% % NH Black 2% 1% 2% 2% % Asian-American 10% 5% 8% 8% Total 7,701 2,594 13,182 23,476 % Hisp 17% 53% 17% 21% % NH White 68% 40% 74% 68% % NH Black 3% 1% 1% 2% % Asian/Pac Isl 11% 5% 7% 8% Total 7,337 2,186 11,050 20,573 % Latino est 36% 43% 33% 35% % Spanish-Surnamed 4% 5% 4% 4% % Asian-Surnamed 36% 30% 41% 38% % Filipino-Surnamed 22% 23% 21% 22% % NH White est 6% 5% 5% 5% % NH Black 24% 41% 16% 22% Total 6,004 1,703 9,348 17,056 % Latino est 37% 44% 34% 36% % Spanish-Surnamed 4% 5% 4% 4% % Asian-Surnamed 37% 31% 42% 40% % Filipino-Surnamed 21% 21% 19% 20% % NH White est 5% 5% 5% 5% % NH Black 23% 39% 16% 20% Total 2,711 990 5,695 9,397 % Latino est 15% 31% 13% 16% % Spanish-Surnamed 13% 28% 12% 14% % Asian-Surnamed 3% 5% 4% 4% % Filipino-Surnamed 1% 1% 1% 1% % NH White est 79% 59% 80% 78% % NH Black est 1% 1% 1% 1% ACS Pop Est Total 11,422 5,593 18,015 35,029 age0-19 28% 33% 25% 27% age20-60 56% 54% 59% 58% age60plus 15% 12% 16% 15% immigrants 19% 31% 13% 18% naturalized 53% 30% 54% 47% english 71% 46% 81% 72% spanish 18% 48% 13% 20% asian-lang 5% 2% 3% 3% other lang 7% 4% 4% 5% Language Fluency Speaks Eng "Less than Very Well"12% 27% 6% 12% hs-grad 51% 42% 52% 50% bachelor 25% 16% 28% 25% graduatedegree 10% 8% 14% 12% Child in Household child-under18 37% 47% 37% 38% Pct of Pop Age 16+ employed 65% 61% 66% 65% income 0-25k 8% 10% 6% 7% income 25-50k 12% 20% 12% 13% income 50-75k 16% 16% 13% 15% income 75-200k 53% 34% 53% 51% income 200k-plus 11% 20% 16% 15% single family 92% 83% 83% 86% multi-family 8% 17% 17% 14% rented 24% 40% 25% 27% owned 76% 60% 75% 73% Total population data from the 2010 Decennial Census. Surname-based Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database. Latino voter registration and turnout data are Spanish-surname counts adjusted using Census Population Department undercount estimates. NH White and NH Black registration and turnout counts estimated by NDC. Citizen Voting Age Pop., Age, Immigration, and other demographics from the 2012-2016 American Community Survey and Special Tabulation 5-year data. Housing Stats Household Income Education (among those age 25+) Total Pop City of Moorpark - Map 304 Language spoken at home Immigration Citizen Voting Age Pop Age Voter Registration (Nov 2016) Voter Turnout (Nov 2016) Voter Turnout (Nov 2014) 12 13 District 1 2 3 4 Total Ideal Total Pop 8,649 8,816 8,606 8,350 34,421 Deviation from ideal 44 211 1 -255 466 % Deviation 0 51% 2 45% 0 01% -2 96% 5 42% % Hisp 31% 15% 15% 67% 31% % NH White 57% 71% 73% 27% 57% % NH Black 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% % Asian-American 9% 11% 9% 4% 8% Total 6,108 6,631 6,250 4,487 23,476 % Hisp 19% 12% 13% 50% 21% % NH White 68% 77% 74% 46% 68% % NH Black 3% 0% 2% 1% 2% % Asian/Pac Isl 10% 9% 10% 3% 8% Total 5,757 5,803 5,660 3,352 20,573 % Latino est 35% 32% 31% 50% 35% % Spanish-Surnamed 4% 5% 5% 3% 4% % Asian-Surnamed 37% 42% 44% 22% 38% % Filipino-Surnamed 22% 21% 20% 23% 22% % NH White est 6% 5% 5% 5% 5% % NH Black 22% 12% 12% 53% 22% Total 4,732 4,937 4,880 2,506 17,056 % Latino est 36% 33% 31% 52% 36% % Spanish-Surnamed 4% 4% 4% 3% 4% % Asian-Surnamed 38% 44% 46% 23% 40% % Filipino-Surnamed 21% 19% 19% 21% 20% % NH White est 6% 5% 5% 4% 5% % NH Black 22% 11% 12% 52% 20% Total 2,188 3,078 2,977 1,153 9,397 % Latino est 16% 10% 10% 45% 16% % Spanish-Surnamed 14% 9% 9% 40% 14% % Asian-Surnamed 3% 5% 3% 3% 4% % Filipino-Surnamed 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% % NH White est 78% 81% 85% 48% 78% % NH Black est 1% 1% 1% 0% 1% ACS Pop Est Total 8,838 9,010 8,736 8,444 35,029 age0-19 27% 24% 27% 31% 27% age20-60 57% 59% 57% 57% 58% age60plus 16% 17% 16% 12% 15% immigrants 16% 12% 16% 27% 18% naturalized 60% 58% 60% 26% 47% english 76% 82% 79% 48% 72% spanish 13% 11% 10% 48% 20% asian-lang 5% 4% 3% 2% 3% other lang 6% 4% 8% 2% 5% Language Fluency Speaks Eng "Less than Very Well"10% 6% 8% 23% 12% hs-grad 54% 47% 47% 54% 50% bachelor 26% 31% 30% 12% 25% graduatedegree 9% 16% 17% 5% 12% Child in Household child-under18 35% 37% 38% 42% 38% Pct of Pop Age 16+ employed 65% 65% 67% 63% 65% income 0-25k 6% 4% 6% 13% 7% income 25-50k 11% 10% 7% 24% 13% income 50-75k 16% 9% 14% 21% 15% income 75-200k 55% 54% 54% 39% 51% income 200k-plus 11% 23% 19% 3% 15% single family 95% 92% 97% 57% 86% multi-family 5% 8% 3% 43% 14% rented 20% 16% 15% 61% 27% owned 80% 84% 85% 39% 73% Total population data from the 2010 Decennial Census. Surname-based Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database. Latino voter registration and turnout data are Spanish-surname counts adjusted using Census Population Department undercount estimates. NH White and NH Black registration and turnout counts estimated by NDC. Citizen Voting Age Pop., Age, Immigration, and other demographics from the 2012-2016 American Community Survey and Special Tabulation 5-year data. Housing Stats Household Income Education (among those age 25+) Total Pop City of Moorpark - Map 401 Language spoken at home 8,605 Immigration Citizen Voting Age Pop Age Voter Registration (Nov 2016) Voter Turnout (Nov 2016) Voter Turnout (Nov 2014) 14 15 District 1 2 3 4 Total Ideal Total Pop 8,664 8,664 8,692 8,401 34,421 Deviation from ideal 59 59 87 -204 291 % Deviation 0 69% 0 69% 1 01% -2 37% 3 38% % Hisp 31% 60% 13% 21% 31% % NH White 57% 32% 74% 67% 57% % NH Black 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% % Asian-American 9% 5% 10% 9% 8% Total 6,116 4,920 6,635 5,805 23,476 % Hisp 19% 46% 11% 15% 21% % NH White 68% 49% 79% 72% 68% % NH Black 3% 1% 0% 3% 2% % Asian/Pac Isl 10% 3% 9% 10% 8% Total 5,759 3,405 5,936 5,472 20,573 % Latino est 35% 46% 32% 33% 35% % Spanish-Surnamed 4% 4% 5% 4% 4% % Asian-Surnamed 37% 27% 43% 41% 38% % Filipino-Surnamed 22% 23% 21% 21% 22% % NH White est 6% 5% 5% 5% 5% % NH Black 22% 46% 11% 18% 22% Total 4,732 2,623 5,076 4,624 17,056 % Latino est 36% 47% 33% 33% 36% % Spanish-Surnamed 4% 4% 4% 4% 4% % Asian-Surnamed 38% 28% 44% 43% 40% % Filipino-Surnamed 21% 20% 19% 19% 20% % NH White est 6% 4% 5% 4% 5% % NH Black 22% 44% 10% 17% 20% Total 2,188 1,701 2,936 2,572 9,397 % Latino est 16% 36% 8% 10% 16% % Spanish-Surnamed 14% 33% 7% 9% 14% % Asian-Surnamed 3% 4% 4% 3% 4% % Filipino-Surnamed 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% % NH White est 78% 52% 86% 84% 78% % NH Black est 1% 1% 0% 1% 1% ACS Pop Est Total 8,854 8,827 8,836 8,513 35,029 age0-19 27% 30% 24% 28% 27% age20-60 57% 56% 60% 57% 58% age60plus 16% 14% 17% 15% 15% immigrants 16% 25% 10% 20% 18% naturalized 60% 31% 59% 51% 47% english 76% 54% 85% 72% 72% spanish 13% 42% 8% 18% 20% asian-lang 5% 2% 4% 3% 3% other lang 6% 3% 3% 8% 5% Language Fluency Speaks Eng "Less than Very Well"10% 20% 4% 13% 12% hs-grad 54% 53% 48% 46% 50% bachelor 26% 15% 31% 28% 25% graduatedegree 9% 7% 17% 14% 12% Child in Household child-under18 35% 41% 37% 39% 38% Pct of Pop Age 16+ employed 65% 61% 68% 66% 65% income 0-25k 6% 12% 3% 8% 7% income 25-50k 11% 22% 9% 10% 13% income 50-75k 16% 19% 8% 16% 15% income 75-200k 55% 36% 61% 50% 51% income 200k-plus 11% 11% 19% 17% 15% single family 95% 61% 92% 93% 86% multi-family 5% 39% 8% 7% 14% rented 20% 54% 15% 21% 27% owned 80% 46% 85% 79% 73% Total population data from the 2010 Decennial Census. Surname-based Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database. Latino voter registration and turnout data are Spanish-surname counts adjusted using Census Population Department undercount estimates. NH White and NH Black registration and turnout counts estimated by NDC. Citizen Voting Age Pop., Age, Immigration, and other demographics from the 2012-2016 American Community Survey and Special Tabulation 5-year data. Housing Stats Household Income Education (among those age 25+) Total Pop City of Moorpark - Map 402 Language spoken at home 8,605 Immigration Citizen Voting Age Pop Age Voter Registration (Nov 2016) Voter Turnout (Nov 2016) Voter Turnout (Nov 2014) 16 17 District 1 2 3 4 Total Ideal Total Pop 8,955 8,080 9,511 7,875 34,421 Deviation from ideal 350 -525 906 -730 1,636 % Deviation 4 07% -6 10% 10 53% -8 48% 19 01% % Hisp 29% 58% 26% 13% 31% % NH White 58% 34% 62% 75% 57% % NH Black 2% 1% 2% 2% 2% % Asian-American 10% 6% 9% 8% 8% Total 6,274 4,312 6,945 5,946 23,476 % Hisp 20% 33% 23% 12% 21% % NH White 64% 58% 68% 78% 68% % NH Black 3% 1% 1% 1% 2% % Asian/Pac Isl 11% 7% 7% 7% 8% Total 5,297 4,291 5,794 5,191 20,573 % Latino est 36% 40% 35% 31% 35% % Spanish-Surnamed 4% 4% 4% 4% 4% % Asian-Surnamed 36% 32% 39% 44% 38% % Filipino-Surnamed 22% 23% 21% 20% 22% % NH White est 5% 5% 5% 5% 5% % NH Black 22% 35% 20% 11% 22% Total 4,352 3,395 4,844 4,464 17,056 % Latino est 37% 41% 36% 31% 36% % Spanish-Surnamed 4% 4% 4% 4% 4% % Asian-Surnamed 38% 33% 40% 45% 40% % Filipino-Surnamed 20% 21% 19% 19% 20% % NH White est 5% 5% 5% 5% 5% % NH Black 21% 33% 19% 11% 20% Total 1,986 1,655 2,966 2,790 9,397 % Latino est 13% 28% 16% 9% 16% % Spanish-Surnamed 12% 26% 15% 8% 14% % Asian-Surnamed 4% 4% 4% 3% 4% % Filipino-Surnamed 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% % NH White est 80% 65% 76% 86% 78% % NH Black est 1% 0% 1% 1% 1% ACS Pop Est Total 9,112 8,200 9,714 8,002 35,029 age0-19 29% 30% 26% 25% 27% age20-60 56% 57% 58% 59% 58% age60plus 15% 14% 16% 16% 15% immigrants 20% 24% 15% 12% 18% naturalized 51% 36% 46% 62% 47% english 69% 59% 74% 85% 72% spanish 19% 34% 20% 7% 20% asian-lang 5% 3% 3% 3% 3% other lang 7% 4% 3% 5% 5% Language Fluency Speaks Eng "Less than Very Well"13% 18% 9% 6% 12% hs-grad 50% 52% 52% 47% 50% bachelor 26% 19% 24% 32% 25% graduatedegree 11% 7% 13% 17% 12% Child in Household child-under18 37% 39% 38% 37% 38% Pct of Pop Age 16+ employed 65% 64% 64% 68% 65% income 0-25k 8% 10% 7% 4% 7% income 25-50k 11% 17% 14% 8% 13% income 50-75k 16% 18% 13% 11% 15% income 75-200k 52% 47% 48% 56% 51% income 200k-plus 12% 7% 18% 20% 15% single family 92% 77% 78% 98% 86% multi-family 8% 23% 22% 2% 14% rented 24% 40% 32% 12% 27% owned 76% 60% 68% 88% 73% Total population data from the 2010 Decennial Census. Surname-based Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database. Latino voter registration and turnout data are Spanish-surname counts adjusted using Census Population Department undercount estimates. NH White and NH Black registration and turnout counts estimated by NDC. Citizen Voting Age Pop., Age, Immigration, and other demographics from the 2012-2016 American Community Survey and Special Tabulation 5-year data. Housing Stats Household Income Education (among those age 25+) Total Pop City of Moorpark - Map 403 Language spoken at home 8,605 Immigration Citizen Voting Age Pop Age Voter Registration (Nov 2016) Voter Turnout (Nov 2016) Voter Turnout (Nov 2014) 18 19 District 1 2 3 4 Total Ideal Total Pop 5,475 9,372 7,373 12,201 34,421 Deviation from ideal -3,130 767 -1,232 3,596 6,726 % Deviation -36 37% 8 91% -14 32% 41 79% 78 16% % Hisp 72% 33% 15% 22% 31% % NH White 22% 55% 72% 66% 57% % NH Black 1% 2% 2% 2% 2% % Asian-American 5% 9% 10% 9% 8% Total 2,594 6,479 5,296 9,108 23,476 % Hisp 53% 19% 13% 18% 21% % NH White 40% 67% 73% 73% 68% % NH Black 1% 3% 3% 0% 2% % Asian/Pac Isl 5% 10% 10% 7% 8% Total 2,186 6,238 4,872 7,277 20,573 % Latino est 43% 37% 31% 35% 35% % Spanish-Surnamed 5% 4% 5% 4% 4% % Asian-Surnamed 30% 35% 44% 39% 38% % Filipino-Surnamed 23% 23% 20% 21% 22% % NH White est 5% 6% 5% 5% 5% % NH Black 41% 26% 12% 18% 22% Total 1,703 5,058 4,197 6,097 17,056 % Latino est 44% 38% 31% 36% 36% % Spanish-Surnamed 5% 4% 4% 4% 4% % Asian-Surnamed 31% 36% 46% 40% 40% % Filipino-Surnamed 21% 21% 19% 19% 20% % NH White est 5% 5% 4% 5% 5% % NH Black 39% 25% 12% 17% 20% Total 990 2,147 2,562 3,697 9,397 % Latino est 31% 16% 10% 15% 16% % Spanish-Surnamed 28% 14% 9% 14% 14% % Asian-Surnamed 5% 3% 3% 4% 4% % Filipino-Surnamed 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% % NH White est 59% 78% 84% 78% 78% % NH Black est 1% 1% 1% 0% 1% ACS Pop Est Total 5,593 9,568 7,476 12,393 35,029 age0-19 33% 28% 27% 24% 27% age20-60 54% 57% 57% 59% 58% age60plus 12% 15% 16% 17% 15% immigrants 31% 18% 17% 12% 18% naturalized 30% 51% 60% 51% 47% english 46% 72% 77% 80% 72% spanish 48% 18% 11% 14% 20% asian-lang 2% 4% 3% 3% 3% other lang 4% 6% 8% 2% 5% Language Fluency Speaks Eng "Less than Very Well"27% 12% 9% 6% 12% hs-grad 42% 53% 47% 53% 50% bachelor 16% 24% 31% 27% 25% graduatedegree 8% 8% 16% 14% 12% Child in Household child-under18 47% 36% 37% 37% 38% Pct of Pop Age 16+ employed 61% 65% 66% 66% 65% income 0-25k 10% 7% 7% 6% 7% income 25-50k 20% 13% 7% 13% 13% income 50-75k 16% 16% 15% 12% 15% income 75-200k 34% 53% 51% 54% 51% income 200k-plus 20% 10% 19% 14% 15% single family 83% 92% 96% 76% 86% multi-family 17% 8% 4% 24% 14% rented 40% 25% 15% 30% 27% owned 60% 75% 85% 70% 73% Total population data from the 2010 Decennial Census. Surname-based Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database. Latino voter registration and turnout data are Spanish-surname counts adjusted using Census Population Department undercount estimates. NH White and NH Black registration and turnout counts estimated by NDC. Citizen Voting Age Pop., Age, Immigration, and other demographics from the 2012-2016 American Community Survey and Special Tabulation 5-year data. Housing Stats Household Income Education (among those age 25+) Total Pop City of Moorpark - Map 405 Language spoken at home 8,605 Immigration Citizen Voting Age Pop Age Voter Registration (Nov 2016) Voter Turnout (Nov 2016) Voter Turnout (Nov 2014) 20 21 District 1 2 3 4 Total Ideal Total Pop 9,464 8,329 8,621 8,007 34,421 Deviation from ideal 859 -276 16 -598 1,457 % Deviation 9 98% -3 21% 0 19% -6 95% 16 93% % Hisp 63% 30% 15% 14% 31% % NH White 29% 58% 72% 73% 57% % NH Black 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% % Asian-American 5% 9% 9% 10% 8% Total 5,261 5,962 6,258 5,996 23,476 % Hisp 45% 18% 13% 11% 21% % NH White 49% 68% 74% 78% 68% % NH Black 1% 3% 2% 0% 2% % Asian/Pac Isl 4% 10% 10% 9% 8% Total 3,802 5,633 5,665 5,472 20,573 % Latino est 46% 35% 31% 33% 35% % Spanish-Surnamed 4% 4% 5% 4% 4% % Asian-Surnamed 26% 37% 44% 42% 38% % Filipino-Surnamed 23% 22% 20% 21% 22% % NH White est 5% 6% 5% 5% 5% % NH Black 47% 22% 12% 13% 22% Total 2,896 4,629 4,883 4,647 17,056 % Latino est 48% 36% 31% 34% 36% % Spanish-Surnamed 4% 4% 4% 4% 4% % Asian-Surnamed 27% 38% 46% 43% 40% % Filipino-Surnamed 21% 21% 19% 19% 20% % NH White est 4% 6% 5% 5% 5% % NH Black 45% 22% 12% 12% 20% Total 1,548 2,136 2,979 2,734 9,397 % Latino est 37% 16% 10% 10% 16% % Spanish-Surnamed 33% 14% 9% 9% 14% % Asian-Surnamed 4% 3% 3% 4% 4% % Filipino-Surnamed 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% % NH White est 55% 78% 85% 82% 78% % NH Black est 1% 1% 1% 0% 1% ACS Pop Est Total 9,631 8,515 8,752 8,131 35,029 age0-19 31% 27% 27% 23% 27% age20-60 56% 58% 57% 60% 58% age60plus 13% 16% 16% 17% 15% immigrants 27% 16% 16% 11% 18% naturalized 30% 60% 60% 57% 47% english 51% 77% 79% 83% 72% spanish 44% 12% 10% 10% 20% asian-lang 2% 5% 3% 4% 3% other lang 3% 6% 8% 3% 5% Language Fluency Speaks Eng "Less than Very Well"22% 9% 8% 5% 12% hs-grad 50% 55% 47% 49% 50% bachelor 15% 26% 30% 31% 25% graduatedegree 7% 9% 17% 15% 12% Child in Household child-under18 43% 34% 38% 36% 38% Pct of Pop Age 16+ employed 61% 65% 67% 67% 65% income 0-25k 12% 6% 6% 4% 7% income 25-50k 22% 12% 7% 10% 13% income 50-75k 19% 16% 14% 9% 15% income 75-200k 37% 55% 54% 58% 51% income 200k-plus 10% 11% 19% 18% 15% single family 65% 95% 97% 87% 86% multi-family 35% 5% 3% 13% 14% rented 53% 21% 15% 19% 27% owned 47% 79% 85% 81% 73% Total population data from the 2010 Decennial Census. Surname-based Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database. Latino voter registration and turnout data are Spanish-surname counts adjusted using Census Population Department undercount estimates. NH White and NH Black registration and turnout counts estimated by NDC. Citizen Voting Age Pop., Age, Immigration, and other demographics from the 2012-2016 American Community Survey and Special Tabulation 5-year data. Housing Stats Household Income Education (among those age 25+) Total Pop City of Moorpark - Map 406 Language spoken at home 8,605 Immigration Citizen Voting Age Pop Age Voter Registration (Nov 2016) Voter Turnout (Nov 2016) Voter Turnout (Nov 2014) 22 23 District 1 2 3 4 Total Ideal Total Pop 8,590 8,655 8,484 8,692 34,421 Deviation from ideal -15 50 -121 87 208 % Deviation -0 17% 0 58% -1 41% 1 01% 2 42% % Hisp 28% 67% 18% 13% 31% % NH White 58% 27% 70% 74% 57% % NH Black 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% % Asian-American 11% 4% 9% 10% 8% Total 6,032 4,626 6,183 6,635 23,476 % Hisp 17% 49 5% 16% 11% 21% % NH White 69% 46% 72% 79% 68% % NH Black 3% 1% 2% 0% 2% % Asian/Pac Isl 10% 3% 9% 9% 8% Total 5,703 3,471 5,462 5,936 20,573 % Latino est 35% 49% 31% 32% 35% % Spanish-Surnamed 5% 3% 4% 5% 4% % Asian-Surnamed 37% 23% 43% 43% 38% % Filipino-Surnamed 22% 23% 20% 21% 22% % NH White est 6% 5% 5% 5% 5% % NH Black 23% 52% 13% 11% 22% Total 4,692 2,606 4,681 5,076 17,056 % Latino est 36% 51% 31% 33% 36% % Spanish-Surnamed 4% 3% 4% 4% 4% % Asian-Surnamed 38% 24% 45% 44% 40% % Filipino-Surnamed 21% 21% 19% 19% 20% % NH White est 5% 4% 5% 5% 5% % NH Black 22% 51% 13% 10% 20% Total 2,509 1,204 2,665 3,018 9,397 % Latino est 17% 44% 10% 8% 16% % Spanish-Surnamed 15% 39% 9% 7% 14% % Asian-Surnamed 4% 3% 3% 4% 4% % Filipino-Surnamed 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% % NH White est 77% 49% 84% 84% 78% % NH Black est 1% 0% 1% 0% 1% ACS Pop Est Total 8,827 8,752 8,614 8,836 35,029 age0-19 27% 31% 27% 24% 27% age20-60 57% 57% 57% 60% 58% age60plus 16% 13% 16% 17% 15% immigrants 17% 27% 17% 10% 18% naturalized 58% 27% 60% 59% 47% english 75% 49% 77% 85% 72% spanish 14% 47% 11% 8% 20% asian-lang 4% 2% 3% 4% 3% other lang 7% 2% 8% 3% 5% Language Fluency Speaks Eng "Less than Very Well"10% 23% 9% 4% 12% hs-grad 52% 53% 48% 48% 50% bachelor 26% 13% 30% 31% 25% graduatedegree 11% 5% 15% 17% 12% Child in Household child-under18 36% 42% 37% 37% 38% Pct of Pop Age 16+ employed 63% 63% 66% 68% 65% income 0-25k 6% 13% 7% 3% 7% income 25-50k 12% 23% 8% 9% 13% income 50-75k 15% 21% 15% 8% 15% income 75-200k 50% 39% 52% 61% 51% income 200k-plus 17% 3% 18% 19% 15% single family 95% 58% 96% 92% 86% multi-family 5% 42% 4% 8% 14% rented 20% 59% 16% 15% 27% owned 80% 41% 84% 85% 73% Total population data from the 2010 Decennial Census. Surname-based Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database. Latino voter registration and turnout data are Spanish-surname counts adjusted using Census Population Department undercount estimates. NH White and NH Black registration and turnout counts estimated by NDC. Citizen Voting Age Pop., Age, Immigration, and other demographics from the 2012-2016 American Community Survey and Special Tabulation 5-year data. Housing Stats Household Income Education (among those age 25+) Total Pop City of Moorpark - Map 407 Language spoken at home 8,605 Immigration Citizen Voting Age Pop Age Voter Registration (Nov 2016) Voter Turnout (Nov 2016) Voter Turnout (Nov 2014) 24 25 District 1 2 3 4 Total Ideal Total Pop 8,741 7,723 9,080 8,877 34,421 Deviation from ideal 136 -882 475 272 1,357 % Deviation 1 58% -10 25% 5 52% 3 16% 15 77% % Hisp 29% 69% 19% 14% 31% % NH White 57% 25% 68% 73% 57% % NH Black 2% 1% 2% 1% 2% % Asian-American 11% 3% 9% 9% 8% Total 6,100 4,080 6,529 6,767 23,476 % Hisp 17% 49 8% 17% 11% 21% % NH White 69% 45% 71% 78% 68% % NH Black 3% 1% 2% 0% 2% % Asian/Pac Isl 10% 3% 9% 9% 8% Total 5,769 3,065 5,675 6,063 20,573 % Latino est 35% 47% 34% 31% 35% % Spanish-Surnamed 5% 3% 4% 4% 4% % Asian-Surnamed 37% 24% 40% 43% 38% % Filipino-Surnamed 22% 23% 21% 20% 22% % NH White est 6% 5% 5% 5% 5% % NH Black 23% 47% 17% 11% 22% Total 4,747 2,306 4,824 5,178 17,056 % Latino est 36% 49% 34% 32% 36% % Spanish-Surnamed 4% 3% 4% 4% 4% % Asian-Surnamed 38% 25% 42% 45% 40% % Filipino-Surnamed 21% 21% 19% 19% 20% % NH White est 5% 5% 5% 5% 5% % NH Black 22% 45% 17% 11% 20% Total 2,540 886 2,880 3,090 9,397 % Latino est 17% 43% 13% 9% 16% % Spanish-Surnamed 15% 38% 12% 8% 14% % Asian-Surnamed 4% 4% 3% 4% 4% % Filipino-Surnamed 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% % NH White est 77% 49% 79% 85% 78% % NH Black est 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% ACS Pop Est Total 8,979 7,820 9,223 9,007 35,029 age0-19 27% 32% 27% 23% 27% age20-60 57% 57% 57% 60% 58% age60plus 16% 12% 16% 17% 15% immigrants 17% 28% 15% 12% 18% naturalized 59% 28% 54% 61% 47% english 75% 48% 77% 83% 72% spanish 14% 46% 14% 9% 20% asian-lang 4% 3% 3% 3% 3% other lang 7% 3% 6% 4% 5% Language Fluency Speaks Eng "Less than Very Well"10% 25% 8% 6% 12% hs-grad 52% 50% 51% 48% 50% bachelor 26% 14% 26% 32% 25% graduatedegree 11% 5% 16% 15% 12% Child in Household child-under18 36% 43% 39% 35% 38% Pct of Pop Age 16+ employed 63% 64% 66% 67% 65% income 0-25k 6% 12% 8% 5% 7% income 25-50k 12% 22% 10% 10% 13% income 50-75k 15% 20% 14% 11% 15% income 75-200k 50% 42% 52% 56% 51% income 200k-plus 17% 5% 16% 18% 15% single family 95% 70% 84% 91% 86% multi-family 5% 30% 16% 9% 14% rented 20% 51% 27% 16% 27% owned 80% 49% 73% 84% 73% Total population data from the 2010 Decennial Census. Surname-based Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database. Latino voter registration and turnout data are Spanish-surname counts adjusted using Census Population Department undercount estimates. NH White and NH Black registration and turnout counts estimated by NDC. Citizen Voting Age Pop., Age, Immigration, and other demographics from the 2012-2016 American Community Survey and Special Tabulation 5-year data. Housing Stats Household Income Education (among those age 25+) Total Pop City of Moorpark - Map 409 Language spoken at home 8,605 Immigration Citizen Voting Age Pop Age Voter Registration (Nov 2016) Voter Turnout (Nov 2016) Voter Turnout (Nov 2014) 26 27 District 1 2 3 4 Total Ideal Total Pop 8,208 8,935 8,963 8,315 34,421 Deviation from ideal -397 330 358 -290 755 % Deviation -4 61% 3 84% 4 16% -3 37% 8 77% % Hisp 17% 44% 27% 37% 31% % NH White 69% 47% 60% 53% 57% % NH Black 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% % Asian-American 10% 7% 10% 6% 8% Total 6,101 5,842 6,370 5,164 23,476 % Hisp 13% 32 5% 17% 24% 21% % NH White 76% 60% 68% 67% 68% % NH Black 0% 1% 3% 2% 2% % Asian/Pac Isl 10% 6% 10% 7% 8% Total 5,204 4,407 5,997 4,964 20,573 % Latino est 33% 38% 35% 36% 35% % Spanish-Surnamed 5% 4% 4% 4% 4% % Asian-Surnamed 41% 36% 37% 38% 38% % Filipino-Surnamed 21% 22% 22% 21% 22% % NH White est 5% 5% 6% 5% 5% % NH Black 15% 28% 20% 24% 22% Total 4,385 3,609 4,964 4,098 17,056 % Latino est 34% 39% 36% 36% 36% % Spanish-Surnamed 4% 4% 4% 4% 4% % Asian-Surnamed 42% 37% 38% 40% 40% % Filipino-Surnamed 19% 20% 20% 19% 20% % NH White est 5% 5% 5% 4% 5% % NH Black 14% 27% 20% 22% 20% Total 2,736 2,111 2,381 2,169 9,397 % Latino est 12% 24% 14% 14% 16% % Spanish-Surnamed 11% 22% 12% 13% 14% % Asian-Surnamed 5% 4% 3% 3% 4% % Filipino-Surnamed 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% % NH White est 81% 67% 81% 80% 78% % NH Black est 1% 0% 1% 1% 1% ACS Pop Est Total 8,381 9,067 9,155 8,426 35,029 age0-19 24% 29% 27% 29% 27% age20-60 59% 56% 57% 58% 58% age60plus 17% 15% 16% 14% 15% immigrants 14% 19% 17% 22% 18% naturalized 55% 40% 60% 39% 47% english 79% 66% 76% 66% 72% spanish 14% 26% 13% 27% 20% asian-lang 3% 4% 5% 2% 3% other lang 4% 4% 7% 5% 5% Language Fluency Speaks Eng "Less than Very Well"7% 13% 10% 17% 12% hs-grad 48% 51% 54% 47% 50% bachelor 30% 21% 26% 24% 25% graduatedegree 14% 13% 10% 12% 12% Child in Household child-under18 36% 41% 35% 40% 38% Pct of Pop Age 16+ employed 64% 65% 65% 66% 65% income 0-25k 5% 9% 6% 8% 7% income 25-50k 12% 14% 11% 13% 13% income 50-75k 10% 15% 16% 17% 15% income 75-200k 51% 50% 55% 47% 51% income 200k-plus 21% 12% 12% 14% 15% single family 86% 74% 95% 90% 86% multi-family 14% 26% 5% 10% 14% rented 21% 38% 20% 26% 27% owned 79% 62% 80% 74% 73% Total population data from the 2010 Decennial Census. Surname-based Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database. Latino voter registration and turnout data are Spanish-surname counts adjusted using Census Population Department undercount estimates. NH White and NH Black registration and turnout counts estimated by NDC. Citizen Voting Age Pop., Age, Immigration, and other demographics from the 2012-2016 American Community Survey and Special Tabulation 5-year data. Housing Stats Household Income Education (among those age 25+) Total Pop City of Moorpark - Map 410 Language spoken at home 8,605 Immigration Citizen Voting Age Pop Age Voter Registration (Nov 2016) Voter Turnout (Nov 2016) Voter Turnout (Nov 2014) 28 29 District 1 2 3 4 Total Ideal Total Pop 8,270 8,847 8,823 8,481 34,421 Deviation from ideal -335 242 218 -124 577 % Deviation -3 89% 2 81% 2 53% -1 44% 6 71% % Hisp 17% 64% 16% 28% 31% % NH White 70% 28% 73% 59% 57% % NH Black 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% % Asian-American 10% 5% 9% 10% 8% Total 6,242 4,805 6,411 6,019 23,476 % Hisp 13% 46% 14% 18% 21% % NH White 77% 48% 74% 68% 68% % NH Black 0% 1% 2% 3% 2% % Asian/Pac Isl 9% 4% 9% 10% 8% Total 5,336 3,574 6,024 5,638 20,573 % Latino est 33% 47% 31% 35% 35% % Spanish-Surnamed 5% 4% 5% 4% 4% % Asian-Surnamed 41% 25% 44% 37% 38% % Filipino-Surnamed 21% 23% 20% 22% 22% % NH White est 5% 5% 5% 6% 5% % NH Black 14% 49% 12% 21% 22% Total 4,506 2,707 5,186 4,656 17,056 % Latino est 34% 49% 31% 36% 36% % Spanish-Surnamed 4% 4% 4% 4% 4% % Asian-Surnamed 43% 26% 45% 38% 40% % Filipino-Surnamed 19% 21% 19% 21% 20% % NH White est 5% 4% 5% 5% 5% % NH Black 14% 47% 12% 20% 20% Total 2,654 1,434 3,104 2,205 9,397 % Latino est 11% 38% 10% 14% 16% % Spanish-Surnamed 10% 34% 9% 12% 14% % Asian-Surnamed 4% 4% 3% 3% 4% % Filipino-Surnamed 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% % NH White est 83% 54% 82% 80% 78% % NH Black est 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% ACS Pop Est Total 8,436 8,953 8,971 8,669 35,029 age0-19 23% 31% 27% 27% 27% age20-60 59% 56% 57% 58% 58% age60plus 17% 13% 16% 16% 15% immigrants 13% 28% 14% 16% 18% naturalized 57% 29% 59% 60% 47% english 81% 49% 81% 76% 72% spanish 13% 46% 9% 13% 20% asian-lang 3% 3% 3% 5% 3% other lang 4% 3% 7% 6% 5% Language Fluency Speaks Eng "Less than Very Well"6% 23% 7% 10% 12% hs-grad 48% 51% 47% 55% 50% bachelor 31% 14% 29% 26% 25% graduatedegree 14% 6% 18% 9% 12% Child in Household child-under18 36% 42% 39% 34% 38% Pct of Pop Age 16+ employed 65% 63% 67% 65% 65% income 0-25k 5% 13% 6% 6% 7% income 25-50k 12% 21% 7% 12% 13% income 50-75k 10% 20% 13% 16% 15% income 75-200k 52% 40% 55% 55% 51% income 200k-plus 21% 6% 20% 11% 15% single family 87% 63% 98% 95% 86% multi-family 13% 37% 2% 5% 14% rented 20% 55% 14% 21% 27% owned 80% 45% 86% 79% 73% Total population data from the 2010 Decennial Census. Surname-based Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database. Latino voter registration and turnout data are Spanish-surname counts adjusted using Census Population Department undercount estimates. NH White and NH Black registration and turnout counts estimated by NDC. Citizen Voting Age Pop., Age, Immigration, and other demographics from the 2012-2016 American Community Survey and Special Tabulation 5-year data. Housing Stats Household Income Education (among those age 25+) Total Pop City of Moorpark - Map 411 Language spoken at home 8,605 Immigration Citizen Voting Age Pop Age Voter Registration (Nov 2016) Voter Turnout (Nov 2016) Voter Turnout (Nov 2014) 30 31 District 1 2 3 4 Total Ideal Total Pop 8,362 8,649 8,911 8,499 34,421 Deviation from ideal -243 44 306 -106 549 % Deviation -2 82% 0 51% 3 56% -1 23% 6 38% % Hisp 64% 31% 14% 18% 31% % NH White 28% 57% 73% 69% 57% % NH Black 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% % Asian-American 5% 9% 9% 9% 8% Total 4,566 6,108 6,664 6,138 23,476 % Hisp 47% 19% 11% 15% 21% % NH White 47% 68% 78% 72% 68% % NH Black 1% 3% 0% 2% 2% % Asian/Pac Isl 4% 10% 9% 9% 8% Total 3,386 5,749 6,033 5,404 20,573 % Latino est 46% 35% 33% 32% 35% % Spanish-Surnamed 4% 4% 4% 4% 4% % Asian-Surnamed 26% 37% 42% 43% 38% % Filipino-Surnamed 23% 22% 21% 21% 22% % NH White est 5% 6% 5% 5% 5% % NH Black 47% 22% 13% 15% 22% Total 2,587 4,725 5,135 4,609 17,056 % Latino est 48% 36% 33% 32% 36% % Spanish-Surnamed 4% 4% 4% 4% 4% % Asian-Surnamed 27% 38% 43% 44% 40% % Filipino-Surnamed 21% 21% 19% 19% 20% % NH White est 4% 6% 5% 4% 5% % NH Black 45% 22% 12% 15% 20% Total 1,238 2,185 3,029 2,945 9,397 % Latino est 34% 16% 10% 14% 16% % Spanish-Surnamed 31% 14% 9% 12% 14% % Asian-Surnamed 4% 3% 4% 4% 4% % Filipino-Surnamed 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% % NH White est 58% 78% 83% 80% 78% % NH Black est 1% 1% 0% 1% 1% ACS Pop Est Total 8,516 8,838 9,056 8,619 35,029 age0-19 31% 27% 24% 27% 27% age20-60 56% 57% 60% 57% 58% age60plus 13% 16% 17% 16% 15% immigrants 28% 16% 11% 17% 18% naturalized 28% 60% 57% 58% 47% english 49% 76% 84% 77% 72% spanish 47% 13% 10% 13% 20% asian-lang 2% 5% 4% 3% 3% other lang 3% 6% 3% 8% 5% Language Fluency Speaks Eng "Less than Very Well"24% 10% 5% 9% 12% hs-grad 49% 54% 49% 49% 50% bachelor 14% 26% 30% 29% 25% graduatedegree 7% 9% 16% 15% 12% Child in Household child-under18 44% 35% 37% 37% 38% Pct of Pop Age 16+ employed 61% 65% 68% 66% 65% income 0-25k 12% 6% 4% 8% 7% income 25-50k 22% 11% 10% 9% 13% income 50-75k 19% 16% 9% 15% 15% income 75-200k 36% 55% 59% 51% 51% income 200k-plus 11% 11% 18% 18% 15% single family 66% 95% 88% 91% 86% multi-family 34% 5% 12% 9% 14% rented 53% 20% 19% 20% 27% owned 47% 80% 81% 80% 73% Total population data from the 2010 Decennial Census. Surname-based Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database. Latino voter registration and turnout data are Spanish-surname counts adjusted using Census Population Department undercount estimates. NH White and NH Black registration and turnout counts estimated by NDC. Citizen Voting Age Pop., Age, Immigration, and other demographics from the 2012-2016 American Community Survey and Special Tabulation 5-year data. Housing Stats Household Income Education (among those age 25+) Total Pop City of Moorpark - Map 412 Language spoken at home 8,605 Immigration Citizen Voting Age Pop Age Voter Registration (Nov 2016) Voter Turnout (Nov 2016) Voter Turnout (Nov 2014) 32 33 District 1 2 3 4 Total Ideal Total Pop 8,596 8,461 8,815 8,549 34,421 Deviation from ideal -9 -144 210 -56 354 % Deviation -0 10% -1 67% 2 44% -0 65% 4 11% % Hisp 16% 64% 18% 28% 31% % NH White 70% 28% 71% 59% 57% % NH Black 2% 2% 1% 2% 2% % Asian-American 10% 5% 8% 10% 8% Total 6,381 4,530 6,465 6,101 23,476 % Hisp 13% 45% 16% 17% 21% % NH White 76% 48% 74% 68% 68% % NH Black 1% 1% 2% 3% 2% % Asian/Pac Isl 10% 6% 7% 10% 8% Total 5,487 3,547 5,750 5,788 20,573 % Latino est 33% 45% 32% 35% 35% % Spanish-Surnamed 5% 4% 4% 4% 4% % Asian-Surnamed 41% 27% 43% 37% 38% % Filipino-Surnamed 21% 23% 20% 22% 22% % NH White est 5% 5% 5% 6% 5% % NH Black 14% 46% 14% 21% 22% Total 4,636 2,719 4,916 4,784 17,056 % Latino est 34% 47% 32% 36% 36% % Spanish-Surnamed 4% 4% 4% 4% 4% % Asian-Surnamed 43% 28% 44% 38% 40% % Filipino-Surnamed 19% 21% 19% 20% 20% % NH White est 5% 4% 5% 5% 5% % NH Black 14% 44% 14% 20% 20% Total 2,887 1,194 3,049 2,267 9,397 % Latino est 12% 34% 13% 14% 16% % Spanish-Surnamed 11% 31% 12% 12% 14% % Asian-Surnamed 5% 4% 3% 3% 4% % Filipino-Surnamed 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% % NH White est 82% 52% 82% 80% 78% % NH Black est 1% 0% 1% 1% 1% ACS Pop Est Total 8,784 8,546 8,961 8,738 35,029 age0-19 24% 32% 26% 27% 27% age20-60 59% 56% 58% 58% 58% age60plus 17% 13% 16% 16% 15% immigrants 13% 29% 14% 16% 18% naturalized 56% 30% 58% 60% 47% english 80% 48% 81% 76% 72% spanish 13% 46% 10% 13% 20% asian-lang 3% 3% 3% 5% 3% other lang 4% 3% 6% 6% 5% Language Fluency Speaks Eng "Less than Very Well"6% 24% 7% 10% 12% hs-grad 48% 49% 49% 54% 50% bachelor 30% 15% 29% 26% 25% graduatedegree 15% 6% 17% 9% 12% Child in Household child-under18 36% 43% 38% 34% 38% Pct of Pop Age 16+ employed 64% 64% 67% 65% 65% income 0-25k 5% 13% 6% 6% 7% income 25-50k 12% 19% 9% 12% 13% income 50-75k 10% 20% 14% 16% 15% income 75-200k 52% 42% 53% 55% 51% income 200k-plus 22% 6% 18% 11% 15% single family 88% 67% 93% 95% 86% multi-family 12% 33% 7% 5% 14% rented 20% 52% 18% 21% 27% owned 80% 48% 82% 79% 73% Total population data from the 2010 Decennial Census. Surname-based Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database. Latino voter registration and turnout data are Spanish-surname counts adjusted using Census Population Department undercount estimates. NH White and NH Black registration and turnout counts estimated by NDC. Citizen Voting Age Pop., Age, Immigration, and other demographics from the 2012-2016 American Community Survey and Special Tabulation 5-year data. Housing Stats Household Income Education (among those age 25+) Total Pop City of Moorpark - Map 413 Language spoken at home 8,605 Immigration Citizen Voting Age Pop Age Voter Registration (Nov 2016) Voter Turnout (Nov 2016) Voter Turnout (Nov 2014) 34 4321Oak ParkVilla delArroyoMobile Hm PkMoorparkCommunityColgCollege ViewParkVirginiaColony ParkMoorpark PlzOld TownBusinessDistrictMoorparkVillage CtrPeach HillParkMoorparkTown CtrChaparral JrHSVlg Retail &Auto ShopsArroyo VistaCommunityParkMountainMeadows CityParkGlenwoodParkCountryTrail ParkGabbert Canyon ChnnlN 2 Canyon Fire RdCampus RdGraduate CirSwift PlBraun CtDoris CtBe ragan S t E Los Angeles AveD e l f en S t Thionnet PlCollins DrPecan AveBenwood DrCampus Park DrReedley StLuther CirMarquette CirPenn StN Harvard StQueens CtN C r e i g h t o n S t Cornell CirPrinceton Ave L afayette St N A u b u r n C i r N Westwood StCollege H eights DrNogales AveWhite Sage DrH ig h P tE lk R un LoopE l k s R u n W a y Elkton CtBlack Rock CirShenandoah WayFishers CtSpring RdSarazen DrChampionship DrBreezy Glen DrWaterworks RdValley RdH e d y la nd C tFitch AveScience DrSouthfork RdFlinn AveWicks RdBonnie View RdWalnut St2nd StSusan AveRoberts AveEsther AveSherman Ave3rd StMillard StTorridon CtMoorpark AveTierra Rejada RdC rabapple C tShawnee StBrennan R dC offeetree L n P e rs imm o n S tM iller P k wy Dakota Dr M a y a C irStagecoach TrlPeach Hill RdBear Valley RdVista Del Valle DrDonnybrook LnAshbrook LnBella Vista Dr N Millerton RdN Ashtree StBlairwood DrSunnyslope PlChristian Barrett DrSleepy Wind StZaharias CtL it tle r Ct Snead DrCasey RdPoindexter AveGisler RdVilla Campesina AveDarlene LnE n d e a v o u r C t Whitney Ave Kazuko Ct Maureen LnHaynie CtAspen Hills DrGrimes Canyon RdJacobson PlHogan StGabbert Rd Elwin LnN Commerce Ave Courtney LnHarvester StAvedon RdN Buttercreek Rd Tu rfw ay R dCe darmeadow CtCliffrose Ave Walnut Creek RdMountain Trail StLondon Grove CtAlderbrook StA r b o r h i ll S t Havencrest StTorino StEmilio CtCountrywood DrBrookwood DrMeadow St Heather Glen Ct Gentlewood DrT im b e r V ie w C tBroadview DrHavenridge Ct23118118Seabiscuit PlAffirmed PlCity of Moorpark 2018 DistrictingNational Demographics Corporation, January 16, 2019Proposed Election Sequencing:2020: District 2 and one of 1, 3 or 42022: two of 1, 3 or 4Map 416Not population balancedMap layers416Census BlockLandmark AreaPipeline/Power LineRailroadRiverStreetsWater Area35 District 1 2 3 4 Total Ideal Total Pop 2,781 12,051 9,001 10,588 34,421 Deviation from ideal -5,824 3,446 396 1,983 9,270 % Deviation -67.68% 40.05% 4.60% 23.04% 107.73% % Hisp 51% 46% 21% 18% 31% % NH White 37% 44% 66% 70% 57% % NH Black 1% 2% 2% 2% 2% % Asian-American 9% 7% 9% 9% 8% Total 1,763 7,302 6,410 8,002 23,476 % Hisp 42% 25% 18% 15% 21% % NH White 49% 62% 70% 76% 68% % NH Black 1% 2% 2% 0% 2% % Asian/Pac.Isl.6% 9% 8% 8% 8% Total 1,275 7,144 5,287 6,866 20,573 % Latino est.36% 39% 32% 34% 35% % Spanish-Surnamed 6% 4% 4% 4% 4% % Asian-Surnamed 38% 33% 42% 40% 38% % Filipino-Surnamed 22% 23% 21% 21% 22% % NH White est.5% 6% 5% 5% 5% % NH Black 28% 30% 16% 15% 22% Total 1,043 5,715 4,492 5,805 17,056 % Latino est.36% 40% 33% 35% 36% % Spanish-Surnamed 5% 4% 4% 4% 4% % Asian-Surnamed 39% 34% 44% 42% 40% % Filipino-Surnamed 20% 21% 19% 19% 20% % NH White est.5% 5% 4% 5% 5% % NH Black 27% 29% 16% 15% 20% Total 756 2,380 2,853 3,408 9,397 % Latino est.25% 20% 15% 12% 16% % Spanish-Surnamed 22% 18% 13% 11% 14% % Asian-Surnamed 5% 3% 4% 4% 4% % Filipino-Surnamed 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% % NH White est.67% 74% 80% 81% 78% % NH Black est.2% 1% 1% 0% 1% ACS Pop. Est.Total 2,875 12,270 9,126 10,758 35,029 age0-19 31% 29% 27% 24% 27% age20-60 53% 57% 57% 59% 58% age60plus 16% 13% 16% 17% 15% immigrants 25% 22% 17% 11% 18% naturalized 44% 40% 56% 53% 47% english 59% 63% 75% 82% 72% spanish 31% 28% 15% 12% 20% asian-lang 3% 4% 3% 4% 3% other lang 7% 5% 7% 2% 5% Language Fluency Speaks Eng. "Less than Very Well"18% 18% 9% 5% 12% hs-grad 41% 51% 50% 51% 50% bachelor 23% 21% 28% 28% 25% graduatedegree 14% 7% 14% 15% 12% Child in Household child-under18 44% 38% 37% 37% 38% Pct of Pop. Age 16+ employed 57% 65% 65% 67% 65% income 0-25k 8% 8% 8% 5% 7% income 25-50k 14% 15% 10% 12% 13% income 50-75k 13% 17% 16% 11% 15% income 75-200k 33% 51% 49% 56% 51% income 200k-plus 33% 9% 16% 16% 15% single family 91% 89% 87% 81% 86% multi-family 9% 11% 13% 19% 14% rented 26% 30% 24% 26% 27% owned 74% 70% 76% 74% 73% Total population data from the 2010 Decennial Census. Surname-based Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database. Latino voter registration and turnout data are Spanish-surname counts adjusted using Census Population Department undercount estimates. NH White and NH Black registration and turnout counts estimated by NDC. Citizen Voting Age Pop., Age, Immigration, and other demographics from the 2012-2016 American Community Survey and Special Tabulation 5-year data. Housing Stats Household Income Education (among those age 25+) Total Pop City of Moorpark - Map 416 Language spoken at home 8,605 Immigration Citizen Voting Age Pop Age Voter Registration (Nov 2016) Voter Turnout (Nov 2016) Voter Turnout (Nov 2014) 36 3412Oak ParkVilla delArroyoMobile Hm PkMoorparkCommunityColgCollege ViewParkVirginiaColony ParkMoorpark PlzOld TownBusinessDistrictMoorparkVillage CtrMonte VistaNature ParkPeach HillParkMoorparkTown CtrChaparral JrHSVlg Retail &Auto ShopsArroyo VistaCommunityParkMountainMeadows CityParkGlenwoodParkCountryTrail ParkGabbert Canyon ChnnlN 2 Canyon Fire RdCampus RdGraduate CirSwift PlBraun CtDoris CtBe ragan S t E Los Angeles AveD e l f en S t Thionnet PlCollins DrPecan AveBenwood DrCampus Park DrReedley StVarsity StLuther CirMarquette CirN Vassar CirQueens CtCornell CirPrinceton Ave L afayette St N A u b u r n C i r N Westwood StCollege H eights DrNogales AveWhite Sage DrH ig h P tE lk R un LoopE l k s R u n W a y Elkton CtBlack Rock CirShenandoah WayFishers CtSpring RdSarazen DrChampionship DrBreezy Glen DrWaterworks RdValley RdH e d y la nd C tFitch AveScience DrSouthfork RdFlinn AveWicks RdBonnie View RdWalnut St2nd StSusan AveRoberts AveEsther AveSherman Ave3rd StMillard StTorridon CtMoorpark AveTierra Rejada RdC rabapple C tShawnee StBrennan R dC offeetree L n P e rs imm o n S tM iller P k wy Dakota Dr M a y a C irStagecoach TrlPeach Hill RdVista Del Valle DrRolling Knoll Ln Donnybrook LnAshbrook LnBella Vista Dr N Millerton RdN Ashtree StBlairwood DrSunnyslope PlChristian Barrett DrSleepy Wind StZaharias CtL it tle r Ct Snead DrCasey RdPoindexter AveGisler RdVilla Campesina AveDarlene LnE n d e a v o u r C t Whitney Ave Kazuko Ct Maureen LnHaynie CtAspen Hills DrGrimes Canyon RdJacobson PlHogan StGabbert Rd Elwin LnN Commerce Ave Courtney LnHarvester StAvedon RdN Buttercreek Rd Tu rfw ay R dCe darmeadow CtCliffrose Ave Walnut Creek RdMountain Trail StLondon Grove CtAlderbrook StA r b o r h i ll S t Havencrest StTorino StEmilio CtCountrywood DrBrookwood DrMeadow St Heather Glen Ct Gentlewood DrT im b e r V ie w C tBroadview DrHavenridge Ct23118118Seabiscuit PlAffirmed PlCity of Moorpark 2018 DistrictingNational Demographics Corporation, January 16, 2019Proposed Election Sequencing:2020: District 1 and one of 2, 3 or 42022: two of 2, 3 or 4Map 417Not population balancedMap layers417Census BlockLandmark AreaPipeline/Power LineRailroadRiverStreetsWater Area37 District 1 2 3 4 Total Ideal Total Pop 6,183 8,664 8,986 10,588 34,421 Deviation from ideal -2,422 59 381 1,983 4,405 % Deviation -28.15% 0.69% 4.43% 23.04% 51.19% % Hisp 70% 31% 21% 18% 31% % NH White 23% 57% 66% 70% 57% % NH Black 1% 2% 2% 2% 2% % Asian-American 5% 9% 9% 9% 8% Total 2,956 6,116 6,403 8,002 23,476 % Hisp 49% 19% 18% 15% 21% % NH White 43% 68% 70% 76% 68% % NH Black 1% 3% 2% 0% 2% % Asian/Pac.Isl.5% 10% 8% 8% 8% Total 2,662 5,762 5,282 6,866 20,573 % Latino est.46% 35% 32% 34% 35% % Spanish-Surnamed 4% 4% 4% 4% 4% % Asian-Surnamed 27% 37% 42% 40% 38% % Filipino-Surnamed 23% 22% 21% 21% 22% % NH White est.5% 6% 5% 5% 5% % NH Black 46% 22% 16% 15% 22% Total 2,027 4,735 4,489 5,805 17,056 % Latino est.47% 36% 33% 35% 36% % Spanish-Surnamed 4% 4% 4% 4% 4% % Asian-Surnamed 28% 38% 44% 42% 40% % Filipino-Surnamed 21% 21% 19% 19% 20% % NH White est.4% 6% 4% 5% 5% % NH Black 44% 22% 16% 15% 20% Total 948 2,190 2,851 3,408 9,397 % Latino est.32% 16% 15% 12% 16% % Spanish-Surnamed 29% 14% 13% 11% 14% % Asian-Surnamed 5% 3% 4% 4% 4% % Filipino-Surnamed 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% % NH White est.58% 78% 80% 81% 78% % NH Black est.1% 1% 1% 0% 1% ACS Pop. Est.Total 6,307 8,854 9,111 10,758 35,029 age0-19 34% 27% 27% 24% 27% age20-60 55% 57% 57% 59% 58% age60plus 12% 16% 16% 17% 15% immigrants 32% 16% 17% 11% 18% naturalized 27% 60% 56% 53% 47% english 42% 76% 75% 82% 72% spanish 52% 13% 15% 12% 20% asian-lang 2% 5% 3% 4% 3% other lang 3% 6% 7% 2% 5% Language Fluency Speaks Eng. "Less than Very Well"29% 10% 9% 5% 12% hs-grad 42% 54% 50% 51% 50% bachelor 14% 26% 28% 28% 25% graduatedegree 7% 9% 14% 15% 12% Child in Household child-under18 48% 35% 37% 37% 38% Pct of Pop. Age 16+ employed 61% 65% 65% 67% 65% income 0-25k 11% 6% 8% 5% 7% income 25-50k 22% 11% 10% 12% 13% income 50-75k 17% 16% 16% 11% 15% income 75-200k 34% 55% 49% 56% 51% income 200k-plus 16% 11% 16% 16% 15% single family 80% 95% 87% 81% 86% multi-family 20% 5% 13% 19% 14% rented 47% 20% 24% 26% 27% owned 53% 80% 76% 74% 73% Total population data from the 2010 Decennial Census. Surname-based Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database. Latino voter registration and turnout data are Spanish-surname counts adjusted using Census Population Department undercount estimates. NH White and NH Black registration and turnout counts estimated by NDC. Citizen Voting Age Pop., Age, Immigration, and other demographics from the 2012-2016 American Community Survey and Special Tabulation 5-year data. Housing Stats Household Income Education (among those age 25+) Total Pop City of Moorpark - Map 417 Language spoken at home 8,605 Immigration Citizen Voting Age Pop Age Voter Registration (Nov 2016) Voter Turnout (Nov 2016) Voter Turnout (Nov 2014) 38 4321Oak ParkVilla delArroyoMobile Hm PkMoorparkCommunityColgCollege ViewParkCampus ParkVirginiaColony ParkMoorpark PlzOld TownBusinessDistrictMoorparkVillage CtrPeach HillParkChaparral JrHSVlg Retail &Auto ShopsArroyo VistaCommunityParkMountainMeadows CityParkGlenwoodParkCountryTrail ParkGabbert Canyon ChnnlN 2 Canyon Fire RdCampus RdGraduate CirSwift PlBraun CtDoris CtBe ragan S t E Los Angeles AveD e l f en S t Thionnet PlCollins DrPecan AveBenwood DrCampus Park DrVarsity StLuther CirMarquette StLoyola StQueens CtCornell CirPrinceton Ave L afayette St N A u b u r n C i r N Westwood StCollege H eights DrCondor DrNogales AveWhite Sage DrH ig h P tE lk R un LoopE l k s R u n W a y Elkton CtBlack Rock CirShenandoah WayFishers CtSpring RdSarazen DrChampionship DrBreezy Glen DrWaterworks RdValley RdH e d y la nd C tFitch AveScience DrSouthfork RdFlinn AveWicks RdBonnie View RdWalnut St2nd StSusan AveRoberts AveEsther AveSherman AveFlory AveWestcott CtMajestic CtTierra Rejada RdC rabapple C tShawnee StBrennan R dC offeetree L n P e rs imm o n S tM iller P k wy Dakota Dr M a y a C irStagecoach TrlPeach Hill RdBear Valley RdVista Del Valle DrDonnybrook LnAshbrook LnBella Vista Dr N Millerton RdN Vistapark DrC l a v e l e A v e Blairwood DrSunnyslope PlSleepy Wind StZaharias CtL it tle r Ct Snead DrCasey RdPoindexter AveGisler RdDarlene LnE n d e a v o u r C t Whitney Ave Shasta AveGoldman Ave Maureen LnHaynie CtAspen Hills DrGrimes Canyon RdJacobson PlHogan StGabbert Rd Elwin LnN Commerce Ave Courtney LnHarvester StAvedon RdN Buttercreek Rd Tu rfw ay R dN Terracemeadow CtNw Cloverdale StOak Glen M istygrove StMountain Trail StAlderbrook StA r b o r h i ll S t Havencrest StHoneybrook CtTorino StEmilio CtT ierra R ejada R dClearwood RdMeadow StH e a t h e r d a l e Ct B r o a d v i e w D r Flowerwood CtBentcreek RdDalaway Dr23118118Seabiscuit PlAffirmed PlMira Sol DrCity of Moorpark 2018 DistrictingNational Demographics Corporation, January 16, 2019Proposed Election Sequencing:2020: District 4 and one of 1, 2, or 32022: two of 1, 2, or 3Map 418Map layers418Census BlockLandmark AreaPipeline/Power LineRailroadRiverStreetsWater Area39 District 1 2 3 4 Total Ideal Total Pop 8,698 8,649 8,739 8,335 34,421 Deviation from ideal 93 44 134 -270 404 % Deviation 1.08% 0.51% 1.56% -3.14% 4.69% % Hisp 15% 31% 15% 67% 31% % NH White 71% 57% 72% 27% 57% % NH Black 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% % Asian-American 11% 9% 10% 4% 8% Total 6,520 6,108 6,369 4,479 23,476 % Hisp 12% 19% 13% 50% 21% % NH White 77% 68% 74% 46% 68% % NH Black 0% 3% 2% 1% 2% % Asian/Pac.Isl.9% 10% 10% 3% 8% Total 5,717 5,757 5,751 3,347 20,573 % Latino est.32% 35% 31% 50% 35% % Spanish-Surnamed 5% 4% 5% 3% 4% % Asian-Surnamed 42% 37% 44% 22% 38% % Filipino-Surnamed 21% 22% 20% 23% 22% % NH White est.5% 6% 5% 5% 5% % NH Black 12% 22% 12% 53% 22% Total 4,864 4,732 4,957 2,503 17,056 % Latino est.33% 36% 31% 52% 36% % Spanish-Surnamed 4% 4% 4% 3% 4% % Asian-Surnamed 44% 38% 46% 23% 40% % Filipino-Surnamed 19% 21% 19% 21% 20% % NH White est.5% 6% 5% 4% 5% % NH Black 12% 22% 12% 52% 20% Total 3,032 2,188 3,025 1,152 9,397 % Latino est.10% 16% 10% 45% 16% % Spanish-Surnamed 9% 14% 9% 40% 14% % Asian-Surnamed 5% 3% 3% 3% 4% % Filipino-Surnamed 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% % NH White est.81% 78% 85% 48% 78% % NH Black est.1% 1% 1% 0% 1% ACS Pop. Est.Total 8,890 8,838 8,871 8,429 35,029 age0-19 24% 27% 27% 31% 27% age20-60 59% 57% 57% 57% 58% age60plus 17% 16% 16% 12% 15% immigrants 12% 16% 16% 27% 18% naturalized 58% 60% 60% 26% 47% english 82% 76% 79% 48% 72% spanish 11% 13% 10% 48% 20% asian-lang 3% 5% 3% 2% 3% other lang 4% 6% 7% 2% 5% Language Fluency Speaks Eng. "Less than Very Well"6% 10% 8% 23% 12% hs-grad 47% 54% 47% 54% 50% bachelor 31% 26% 30% 12% 25% graduatedegree 16% 9% 17% 4% 12% Child in Household child-under18 37% 35% 38% 42% 38% Pct of Pop. Age 16+ employed 65% 65% 67% 63% 65% income 0-25k 4% 6% 6% 13% 7% income 25-50k 10% 11% 7% 24% 13% income 50-75k 9% 16% 14% 21% 15% income 75-200k 54% 55% 54% 39% 51% income 200k-plus 23% 11% 19% 3% 15% single family 92% 95% 97% 56% 86% multi-family 8% 5% 3% 44% 14% rented 16% 20% 15% 61% 27% owned 84% 80% 85% 39% 73% Total population data from the 2010 Decennial Census. Surname-based Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database. Latino voter registration and turnout data are Spanish-surname counts adjusted using Census Population Department undercount estimates. NH White and NH Black registration and turnout counts estimated by NDC. Citizen Voting Age Pop., Age, Immigration, and other demographics from the 2012-2016 American Community Survey and Special Tabulation 5-year data. Housing Stats Household Income Education (among those age 25+) Total Pop City of Moorpark - Map 418 Language spoken at home 8,605 Immigration Citizen Voting Age Pop Age Voter Registration (Nov 2016) Voter Turnout (Nov 2016) Voter Turnout (Nov 2014) 40 41 District 1 2 3 4 Total Ideal Total Pop 8,159 9,063 8,172 9,027 34,421 Deviation from ideal -446 458 -433 422 904 % Deviation -5 18% 5 32% -5 03% 4 90% 10 51% % Hisp 17% 26% 70% 15% 31% % NH White 69% 60% 24% 73% 57% % NH Black 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% % Asian-American 10% 10% 4% 9% 8% Total 6,068 6,419 4,363 6,627 23,476 % Hisp 13% 15% 52% 14% 21% % NH White 76% 70% 44% 75% 68% % NH Black 0% 3% 1% 2% 2% % Asian/Pac Isl 10% 11% 2% 8% 8% Total 5,184 6,189 3,105 6,094 20,573 % Latino est 33% 35% 49% 31% 35% % Spanish-Surnamed 5% 4% 3% 4% 4% % Asian-Surnamed 41% 37% 23% 44% 38% % Filipino-Surnamed 21% 22% 23% 20% 22% % NH White est 5% 6% 5% 5% 5% % NH Black 15% 21% 53% 12% 22% Total 4,369 5,107 2,320 5,260 17,056 % Latino est 34% 36% 51% 31% 36% % Spanish-Surnamed 4% 4% 3% 4% 4% % Asian-Surnamed 42% 38% 23% 45% 40% % Filipino-Surnamed 19% 21% 21% 19% 20% % NH White est 5% 5% 4% 5% 5% % NH Black 14% 21% 51% 12% 20% Total 2,726 2,416 1,057 3,198 9,397 % Latino est 12% 15% 44% 10% 16% % Spanish-Surnamed 11% 14% 40% 9% 14% % Asian-Surnamed 5% 3% 4% 3% 4% % Filipino-Surnamed 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% % NH White est 81% 79% 48% 83% 78% % NH Black est 1% 1% 0% 1% 1% ACS Pop Est Total 8,331 9,253 8,266 9,179 35,029 age0-19 24% 27% 31% 27% 27% age20-60 59% 57% 57% 58% 58% age60plus 17% 16% 12% 16% 15% immigrants 14% 17% 27% 14% 18% naturalized 55% 60% 27% 60% 47% english 79% 75% 49% 82% 72% spanish 14% 13% 47% 9% 20% asian-lang 3% 5% 2% 3% 3% other lang 4% 7% 2% 6% 5% Language Fluency Speaks Eng "Less than Very Well"7% 10% 23% 7% 12% hs-grad 48% 53% 52% 47% 50% bachelor 30% 26% 13% 30% 25% graduatedegree 14% 10% 5% 18% 12% Child in Household child-under18 36% 35% 42% 39% 38% Pct of Pop Age 16+ employed 64% 65% 63% 67% 65% income 0-25k 5% 7% 13% 5% 7% income 25-50k 12% 11% 23% 7% 13% income 50-75k 10% 16% 21% 12% 15% income 75-200k 51% 55% 40% 55% 51% income 200k-plus 22% 12% 4% 20% 15% single family 87% 94% 60% 98% 86% multi-family 13% 6% 40% 2% 14% rented 21% 20% 58% 14% 27% owned 79% 80% 42% 86% 73% Total population data from the 2010 Decennial Census. Surname-based Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database. Latino voter registration and turnout data are Spanish-surname counts adjusted using Census Population Department undercount estimates. NH White and NH Black registration and turnout counts estimated by NDC. Citizen Voting Age Pop., Age, Immigration, and other demographics from the 2012-2016 American Community Survey and Special Tabulation 5-year data. Housing Stats Household Income Education (among those age 25+) Total Pop City of Moorpark - Map 421 Language spoken at home 8,605 Immigration Citizen Voting Age Pop Age Voter Registration (Nov 2016) Voter Turnout (Nov 2016) Voter Turnout (Nov 2014) 42 43 District 1 2 3 4 Total Ideal Total Pop 8,672 8,731 8,334 8,684 34,421 Deviation from ideal 67 126 -271 79 397 % Deviation 0 78% 1 46% -3 15% 0 92% 4 61% % Hisp 15% 26% 70% 16% 31% % NH White 69% 61% 24% 73% 57% % NH Black 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% % Asian-American 12% 10% 3% 8% 8% Total 6,474 6,204 4,470 6,328 23,476 % Hisp 11% 15% 53% 15% 21% % NH White 77% 70% 43% 75% 68% % NH Black 0% 3% 1% 2% 2% % Asian/Pac Isl 11% 11% 2% 7% 8% Total 5,578 5,947 3,162 5,885 20,573 % Latino est 32% 35% 49% 32% 35% % Spanish-Surnamed 5% 4% 3% 4% 4% % Asian-Surnamed 42% 37% 23% 43% 38% % Filipino-Surnamed 21% 22% 23% 20% 22% % NH White est 5% 6% 5% 5% 5% % NH Black 13% 20% 53% 14% 22% Total 4,713 4,923 2,364 5,055 17,056 % Latino est 33% 36% 51% 32% 36% % Spanish-Surnamed 5% 4% 3% 4% 4% % Asian-Surnamed 43% 38% 23% 45% 40% % Filipino-Surnamed 19% 20% 21% 19% 20% % NH White est 5% 5% 4% 5% 5% % NH Black 13% 20% 51% 14% 20% Total 2,904 2,359 1,082 3,052 9,397 % Latino est 12% 14% 44% 11% 16% % Spanish-Surnamed 11% 12% 40% 10% 14% % Asian-Surnamed 5% 3% 4% 3% 4% % Filipino-Surnamed 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% % NH White est 81% 81% 48% 82% 78% % NH Black est 1% 1% 0% 1% 1% ACS Pop Est Total 8,847 8,918 8,429 8,836 35,029 age0-19 25% 27% 31% 26% 27% age20-60 58% 57% 57% 58% 58% age60plus 17% 16% 12% 16% 15% immigrants 15% 17% 28% 13% 18% naturalized 59% 60% 27% 58% 47% english 78% 76% 48% 83% 72% spanish 13% 13% 47% 9% 20% asian-lang 4% 5% 2% 3% 3% other lang 5% 7% 2% 6% 5% Language Fluency Speaks Eng "Less than Very Well"7% 10% 24% 6% 12% hs-grad 46% 54% 52% 49% 50% bachelor 32% 26% 13% 29% 25% graduatedegree 15% 10% 5% 17% 12% Child in Household child-under18 36% 35% 42% 38% 38% Pct of Pop Age 16+ employed 65% 65% 63% 67% 65% income 0-25k 5% 6% 13% 5% 7% income 25-50k 10% 11% 23% 9% 13% income 50-75k 10% 16% 21% 13% 15% income 75-200k 52% 55% 40% 54% 51% income 200k-plus 23% 12% 3% 19% 15% single family 91% 95% 60% 95% 86% multi-family 9% 5% 40% 5% 14% rented 17% 20% 58% 17% 27% owned 83% 80% 42% 83% 73% Total population data from the 2010 Decennial Census. Surname-based Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database. Latino voter registration and turnout data are Spanish-surname counts adjusted using Census Population Department undercount estimates. NH White and NH Black registration and turnout counts estimated by NDC. Citizen Voting Age Pop., Age, Immigration, and other demographics from the 2012-2016 American Community Survey and Special Tabulation 5-year data. Housing Stats Household Income Education (among those age 25+) Total Pop City of Moorpark - Map 422 Language spoken at home 8,605 Immigration Citizen Voting Age Pop Age Voter Registration (Nov 2016) Voter Turnout (Nov 2016) Voter Turnout (Nov 2014) 44 45 District 1 2 3 4 Total Ideal Total Pop 8,595 8,331 8,904 8,591 34,421 Deviation from ideal -10 -274 299 -14 573 % Deviation -0 12% -3 18% 3 47% -0 16% 6 66% % Hisp 17% 26% 66% 15% 31% % NH White 69% 60% 27% 73% 57% % NH Black 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% % Asian-American 10% 10% 4% 9% 8% Total 6,384 5,917 4,865 6,310 23,476 % Hisp 13% 16% 48% 14% 21% % NH White 76% 69% 47% 75% 68% % NH Black 0% 3% 1% 2% 2% % Asian/Pac Isl 9% 10% 4% 9% 8% Total 5,592 5,706 3,588 5,686 20,573 % Latino est 33% 35% 47% 31% 35% % Spanish-Surnamed 5% 4% 4% 4% 4% % Asian-Surnamed 41% 37% 25% 44% 38% % Filipino-Surnamed 21% 22% 23% 20% 22% % NH White est 5% 6% 5% 5% 5% % NH Black 14% 21% 48% 12% 22% Total 4,723 4,706 2,721 4,906 17,056 % Latino est 34% 36% 48% 31% 36% % Spanish-Surnamed 4% 4% 4% 4% 4% % Asian-Surnamed 42% 38% 26% 45% 40% % Filipino-Surnamed 19% 21% 21% 19% 20% % NH White est 5% 5% 4% 5% 5% % NH Black 14% 21% 47% 12% 20% Total 2,860 2,212 1,260 3,064 9,397 % Latino est 12% 14% 41% 10% 16% % Spanish-Surnamed 11% 13% 36% 9% 14% % Asian-Surnamed 5% 3% 4% 3% 4% % Filipino-Surnamed 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% % NH White est 82% 80% 52% 83% 78% % NH Black est 1% 1% 0% 1% 1% ACS Pop Est Total 8,777 8,514 9,004 8,734 35,029 age0-19 24% 27% 31% 27% 27% age20-60 59% 57% 56% 58% 58% age60plus 17% 16% 13% 16% 15% immigrants 14% 16% 27% 14% 18% naturalized 55% 60% 30% 60% 47% english 80% 76% 50% 82% 72% spanish 14% 13% 44% 9% 20% asian-lang 3% 5% 3% 3% 3% other lang 4% 6% 3% 7% 5% Language Fluency Speaks Eng "Less than Very Well"7% 10% 22% 7% 12% hs-grad 48% 54% 51% 47% 50% bachelor 30% 26% 15% 30% 25% graduatedegree 14% 9% 6% 18% 12% Child in Household child-under18 36% 35% 42% 38% 38% Pct of Pop Age 16+ employed 65% 65% 63% 67% 65% income 0-25k 5% 6% 13% 5% 7% income 25-50k 12% 12% 20% 7% 13% income 50-75k 10% 16% 20% 13% 15% income 75-200k 52% 55% 42% 55% 51% income 200k-plus 22% 11% 5% 20% 15% single family 87% 95% 64% 98% 86% multi-family 13% 5% 36% 2% 14% rented 20% 21% 54% 14% 27% owned 80% 79% 46% 86% 73% Total population data from the 2010 Decennial Census. Surname-based Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database. Latino voter registration and turnout data are Spanish-surname counts adjusted using Census Population Department undercount estimates. NH White and NH Black registration and turnout counts estimated by NDC. Citizen Voting Age Pop., Age, Immigration, and other demographics from the 2012-2016 American Community Survey and Special Tabulation 5-year data. Housing Stats Household Income Education (among those age 25+) Total Pop City of Moorpark - Map 423 Language spoken at home 8,605 Immigration Citizen Voting Age Pop Age Voter Registration (Nov 2016) Voter Turnout (Nov 2016) Voter Turnout (Nov 2014) 46 1243Oak ParkVilla delArroyoMobile Hm PkMoorparkCommunityColgCollege ViewParkCampusCanyon ParkCampus ParkVirginiaColony ParkMoorpark PlzOld TownBusinessDistrictMoorparkVillage CtrPeach HillParkCommunityPlaygroundMoorparkTown CtrChaparral JrHSVlg Retail &Auto ShopsArroyo VistaCommunityParkMountainMeadows CityParkGlenwoodParkCountryTrail ParkGabbert Canyon ChnnlN 2 Canyon Fire RdCampus RdGraduate CirSwift PlAlumni WayBraun CtSeitz CtDoris CtMoorpark CollE Los Angeles AveCampus Park DrP e c a n A v e Alyssas CtBambi CtVarsity StLuther CirMarquette CirReedley StQueens CtN C r e i g h t o n S t N Amherst StLaf aye tte St N A u b u r n C i r N Westwood StN Fordham StNogales AveWhite Sage DrH ig h P tE lk R un L oopE l k s R u n W a y Elkton CtSimmons Way Bear Fence CtBlue Ridge WayFishers CtSpring RdSarazen DrChampionship DrBreezy Glen DrWaterworks RdValley RdPrinceton AveCharles StFitch AveScience DrSouthfork RdMiller PkwyFlinn AveWicks RdEverett StFlory Ave2nd StSusan AveRoberts AveEsther AveSherman AveWestcott CtTorridon CtMoorpark Ave Tierra Rejada RdC rabapple C tShawnee StB rennan R dC offeetree L n P e rs im m o n S tOlive StDakota Dr M a ya C irStagecoach TrlPeach Hill RdMcbeth CtHilburn CtChristian Barrett DrShady Knoll CtAdonis PlVista Del Valle Dr Bella Vista Dr Fireside Ln N Millerton RdN Vistapark DrC l a v e l e A v e Greenbush LnBlairwood DrSunnyslope PlSleepy Wind StCamden CtZaharias CtLi t t l e r Ct Snead Dr Casey RdPoindexter AvePark LnLa Palma CtDarlene LnE n d e a v o u r C t Whitney Ave Kazuko Ct Maureen LnB e lt r a m o R a n c h R d Haynie CtAspen Hills DrGrimes Canyon RdJacobson PlHogan StGabbert Rd Elwin LnN Commerce Ave T ie rra R e ja d a R d Avedon RdN Buttercreek Rd T urfw ay Rd N Terracemeadow CtNw Cloverdale StMisty Grove StWestmont DrSpring Creek CtArbor Hill StMountain Trail StWi llow springsAldergrove StArborhill StAlderbrook St M i r a b e l l o S t Northdale DrPinedale RdSagewood DrMeadow St Heather Glen Ct R evel lo S t T im b er V ie w C tM a n o r v i e w C t Broadview DrHavenridge CtD a l a w a y D r2311811811823 Seabiscuit PlAffirmed PlCity of Moorpark 2018 DistrictingNational Demographics Corporation, January 16, 2019Proposed Election Sequencing:2020: District 3 and one of 1, 2 or 42022: two of 1, 2 or 4Map 424Map layers424Census BlockLandmark AreaPipeline/Power LineRailroadRiverStreetsWater Area47 District 1 2 3 4 Total Ideal Total Pop 8,692 8,416 8,664 8,649 34,421 Deviation from ideal 87 -189 59 44 276 % Deviation 1.01% -2.20% 0.69% 0.51% 3.21% % Hisp 13% 21% 60% 31% 31% % NH White 74% 66% 32% 57% 57% % NH Black 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% % Asian-American 10% 9% 5% 9% 8% Total 6,635 5,813 4,920 6,108 23,476 % Hisp 11% 15% 46% 19% 21% % NH White 79% 72% 49% 68% 68% % NH Black 0% 3% 1% 3% 2% % Asian/Pac.Isl.9% 10% 3% 10% 8% Total 5,936 5,477 3,402 5,757 20,573 % Latino est.32% 33% 46% 35% 35% % Spanish-Surnamed 5% 4% 4% 4% 4% % Asian-Surnamed 43% 41% 27% 37% 38% % Filipino-Surnamed 21% 21% 23% 22% 22% % NH White est.5% 5% 5% 6% 5% % NH Black 11% 18% 46% 22% 22% Total 5,076 4,627 2,621 4,732 17,056 % Latino est.33% 33% 47% 36% 36% % Spanish-Surnamed 4% 4% 4% 4% 4% % Asian-Surnamed 44% 43% 28% 38% 40% % Filipino-Surnamed 19% 19% 20% 21% 20% % NH White est.5% 4% 4% 6% 5% % NH Black 10% 17% 44% 22% 20% Total 3,018 2,574 1,616 2,188 9,397 % Latino est.8% 10% 38% 16% 16% % Spanish-Surnamed 7% 9% 34% 14% 14% % Asian-Surnamed 4% 3% 4% 3% 4% % Filipino-Surnamed 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% % NH White est.84% 84% 55% 78% 78% % NH Black est.0% 1% 1% 1% 1% ACS Pop. Est.Total 8,836 8,528 8,827 8,838 35,029 age0-19 24% 28% 30% 27% 27% age20-60 60% 57% 56% 57% 58% age60plus 17% 15% 14% 16% 15% immigrants 10% 20% 25% 16% 18% naturalized 59% 51% 31% 60% 47% english 85% 72% 54% 76% 72% spanish 8% 18% 42% 13% 20% asian-lang 4% 3% 2% 5% 3% other lang 3% 8% 3% 6% 5% Language Fluency Speaks Eng. "Less than Very Well"4% 13% 20% 10% 12% hs-grad 48% 46% 53% 54% 50% bachelor 31% 28% 15% 26% 25% graduatedegree 17% 14% 7% 9% 12% Child in Household child-under18 37% 39% 41% 35% 38% Pct of Pop. Age 16+ employed 68% 66% 61% 65% 65% income 0-25k 3% 8% 12% 6% 7% income 25-50k 9% 10% 22% 11% 13% income 50-75k 8% 16% 19% 16% 15% income 75-200k 61% 50% 36% 55% 51% income 200k-plus 19% 17% 11% 11% 15% single family 92% 94% 61% 95% 86% multi-family 8% 6% 39% 5% 14% rented 15% 21% 54% 20% 27% owned 85% 79% 46% 80% 73% Total population data from the 2010 Decennial Census. Surname-based Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database. Latino voter registration and turnout data are Spanish-surname counts adjusted using Census Population Department undercount estimates. NH White and NH Black registration and turnout counts estimated by NDC. Citizen Voting Age Pop., Age, Immigration, and other demographics from the 2012-2016 American Community Survey and Special Tabulation 5-year data. Housing Stats Household Income Education (among those age 25+) Total Pop City of Moorpark - Map 424 Language spoken at home 8,605 Immigration Citizen Voting Age Pop Age Voter Registration (Nov 2016) Voter Turnout (Nov 2016) Voter Turnout (Nov 2014) 48 49 District 1 2345Total Ideal Total Pop 6,920 6,879 6,876 6,703 7,043 34,421 Deviation from ideal 36 -5 -8 -181 159 340 % Deviation 0 52% -0 07% -0 12% -2 63% 2 31% 4 94% % Hisp 31% 30% 69% 15% 13% 31% % NH White 55% 59% 25% 72% 75% 57% % NH Black 2% 2% 2% 2% 1% 2% % Asian-American 9% 8% 4% 10% 10% 8% Total 4,495 4,974 3,632 4,796 5,579 23,476 % Hisp 23% 17% 49% 13% 11% 21% % NH White 64% 70% 47% 74% 78% 68% % NH Black 1% 3% 1% 3% 1% 2% % Asian/Pac Isl 10% 8% 2% 10% 9% 8% Total 3,986 4,843 2,522 4,349 4,873 20,573 % Latino est 35% 36% 52% 31% 31% 35% % Spanish-Surnamed 5% 4% 3% 5% 4% 4% % Asian-Surnamed 39% 36% 20% 44% 43% 38% % Filipino-Surnamed 21% 22% 24% 20% 21% 22% % NH White est 5% 6% 5% 5% 5% 5% % NH Black 23% 22% 57% 12% 10% 22% Total 3,302 3,973 1,850 3,745 4,186 17,056 % Latino est 35% 37% 54% 31% 32% 36% % Spanish-Surnamed 5% 3% 3% 4% 4% 4% % Asian-Surnamed 41% 37% 20% 46% 44% 40% % Filipino-Surnamed 19% 21% 21% 19% 19% 20% % NH White est 5% 6% 4% 4% 5% 5% % NH Black 22% 22% 56% 12% 10% 20% Total 2,007 1,793 791 2,359 2,446 9,397 % Latino est 19% 15% 49% 10% 8% 16% % Spanish-Surnamed 17% 13% 44% 9% 7% 14% % Asian-Surnamed 5% 3% 4% 3% 4% 4% % Filipino-Surnamed 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% % NH White est 74% 80% 44% 84% 84% 78% % NH Black est 1% 1% 0% 1% 0% 1% ACS Pop Est Total 7,066 7,048 6,954 6,795 7,165 35,029 age0-19 28% 26% 31% 27% 24% 27% age20-60 56% 59% 57% 57% 59% 58% age60plus 17% 15% 12% 16% 16% 15% immigrants 21% 14% 27% 18% 10% 18% naturalized 48% 60% 25% 60% 63% 47% english 67% 79% 48% 77% 87% 72% spanish 24% 11% 49% 11% 5% 20% asian-lang 4% 4% 2% 3% 4% 3% other lang 6% 5% 1% 8% 3% 5% Language Fluency Speaks Eng "Less than Very Well"13% 9% 24% 9% 4% 12% hs-grad 48% 57% 54% 47% 45% 50% bachelor 25% 25% 12% 31% 33% 25% graduatedegree 13% 8% 4% 16% 18% 12% Child in Household child-under18 39% 34% 42% 37% 37% 38% Pct of Pop Age 16+ employed 62% 65% 63% 66% 69% 65% income 0-25k 9% 5% 13% 7% 2% 7% income 25-50k 13% 14% 24% 7% 7% 13% income 50-75k 14% 16% 22% 15% 7% 15% income 75-200k 44% 55% 39% 51% 63% 51% income 200k-plus 20% 10% 2% 19% 21% 15% single family 80% 95% 56% 96% 99% 86% multi-family 20% 5% 44% 4% 1% 14% rented 31% 21% 62% 15% 10% 27% owned 69% 79% 38% 85% 90% 73% Total population data from the 2010 Decennial Census. Surname-based Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database. Latino voter registration and turnout data are Spanish-surname counts adjusted using Census Population Department undercount estimates. NH White and NH Black registration and turnout counts estimated by NDC. Citizen Voting Age Pop., Age, Immigration, and other demographics from the 2012-2016 American Community Survey and Special Tabulation 5-year data. Housing Stats Household Income Education (among those age 25+) Total Pop City of Moorpark - Map 508 Language spoken at home 6,884 Immigration Citizen Voting Age Pop Age Voter Registration (Nov 2016) Voter Turnout (Nov 2016) Voter Turnout (Nov 2014) 50 51 District 1 2345Total Ideal Total Pop 6,974 6,786 6,785 6,997 6,879 34,421 Deviation from ideal 90 -98 -99 113 -5 212 % Deviation 1 31% -1 42% -1 44% 1 64% -0 07% 3 08% % Hisp 17% 72% 23% 20% 26% 31% % NH White 68% 23% 64% 69% 61% 57% % NH Black 2% 1% 2% 2% 2% 2% % Asian-American 11% 3% 9% 9% 10% 8% Total 5,016 3,622 4,746 5,174 4,918 23,476 % Hisp 13% 55% 16% 14% 17% 21% % NH White 75% 42% 71% 76% 68% 68% % NH Black 0% 1% 1% 2% 3% 2% % Asian/Pac Isl 10% 2% 11% 7% 10% 8% Total 4,384 2,417 4,569 5,197 4,005 20,573 % Latino est 33% 48% 35% 32% 35% 35% % Spanish-Surnamed 5% 3% 5% 5% 3% 4% % Asian-Surnamed 41% 24% 39% 42% 37% 38% % Filipino-Surnamed 21% 23% 21% 21% 22% 22% % NH White est 5% 5% 5% 5% 6% 5% % NH Black 16% 51% 20% 16% 19% 22% Total 3,688 1,828 3,817 4,419 3,304 17,056 % Latino est 34% 50% 35% 32% 36% 36% % Spanish-Surnamed 5% 3% 4% 4% 3% 4% % Asian-Surnamed 42% 25% 41% 44% 38% 40% % Filipino-Surnamed 19% 21% 20% 19% 20% 20% % NH White est 5% 4% 5% 5% 6% 5% % NH Black 15% 49% 19% 16% 19% 20% Total 2,297 1,095 1,854 2,278 1,872 9,397 % Latino est 13% 42% 11% 11% 13% 16% % Spanish-Surnamed 12% 38% 10% 10% 12% 14% % Asian-Surnamed 5% 3% 4% 3% 3% 4% % Filipino-Surnamed 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% % NH White est 80% 45% 84% 83% 81% 78% % NH Black est 1% 0% 0% 1% 1% 1% ACS Pop Est Total 7,134 6,859 6,893 7,109 7,034 35,029 age0-19 24% 31% 29% 26% 27% 27% age20-60 59% 57% 56% 58% 58% 58% age60plus 17% 13% 15% 16% 16% 15% immigrants 14% 27% 17% 15% 16% 18% naturalized 55% 28% 46% 61% 60% 47% english 78% 49% 74% 80% 77% 72% spanish 15% 46% 18% 10% 12% 20% asian-lang 3% 2% 4% 3% 5% 3% other lang 4% 2% 5% 7% 6% 5% Language Fluency Speaks Eng "Less than Very Well"7% 23% 11% 8% 9% 12% hs-grad 49% 53% 46% 48% 55% 50% bachelor 29% 13% 26% 31% 26% 25% graduatedegree 14% 5% 16% 15% 9% 12% Child in Household child-under18 36% 41% 41% 36% 34% 38% Pct of Pop Age 16+ employed 63% 63% 67% 66% 65% 65% income 0-25k 5% 13% 6% 6% 6% 7% income 25-50k 13% 22% 9% 9% 12% 13% income 50-75k 11% 21% 12% 14% 16% 15% income 75-200k 49% 40% 56% 53% 55% 51% income 200k-plus 22% 3% 17% 18% 11% 15% single family 85% 57% 92% 97% 95% 86% multi-family 15% 43% 8% 3% 5% 14% rented 23% 59% 22% 15% 21% 27% owned 77% 41% 78% 85% 79% 73% Total population data from the 2010 Decennial Census. Surname-based Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database. Latino voter registration and turnout data are Spanish-surname counts adjusted using Census Population Department undercount estimates. NH White and NH Black registration and turnout counts estimated by NDC. Citizen Voting Age Pop., Age, Immigration, and other demographics from the 2012-2016 American Community Survey and Special Tabulation 5-year data. Housing Stats Household Income Education (among those age 25+) Total Pop City of Moorpark - Map 514 Language spoken at home 6,884 Immigration Citizen Voting Age Pop Age Voter Registration (Nov 2016) Voter Turnout (Nov 2016) Voter Turnout (Nov 2014) 52 53 District 1 2345Total Ideal Total Pop 7,061 7,106 6,856 6,520 6,878 34,421 Deviation from ideal 177 222 -28 -364 -6 586 % Deviation 2 57% 3 22% -0 41% -5 29% -0 09% 8 51% % Hisp 31% 31% 66% 13% 15% 31% % NH White 54% 57% 28% 73% 74% 57% % NH Black 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% % Asian-American 12% 8% 3% 10% 8% 8% Total 4,520 5,133 3,764 5,080 4,979 23,476 % Hisp 18% 20% 51% 10% 15% 21% % NH White 64% 68% 46% 79% 76% 68% % NH Black 2% 3% 1% 0% 2% 2% % Asian/Pac Isl 14% 8% 1% 10% 7% 8% Total 4,095 4,858 2,583 4,426 4,611 20,573 % Latino est 35% 36% 50% 32% 31% 35% % Spanish-Surnamed 6% 4% 3% 5% 4% 4% % Asian-Surnamed 39% 36% 22% 43% 44% 38% % Filipino-Surnamed 22% 22% 23% 21% 20% 22% % NH White est 5% 6% 5% 5% 5% 5% % NH Black 23% 22% 53% 11% 12% 22% Total 3,381 3,986 1,940 3,766 3,983 17,056 % Latino est 35% 37% 52% 33% 31% 36% % Spanish-Surnamed 5% 3% 3% 4% 4% 4% % Asian-Surnamed 41% 37% 23% 44% 45% 40% % Filipino-Surnamed 20% 21% 20% 19% 19% 20% % NH White est 5% 6% 4% 5% 5% 5% % NH Black 22% 22% 52% 11% 12% 20% Total 1,809 1,802 1,144 2,250 2,392 9,397 % Latino est 15% 15% 44% 9% 10% 16% % Spanish-Surnamed 14% 13% 39% 8% 9% 14% % Asian-Surnamed 5% 3% 3% 4% 3% 4% % Filipino-Surnamed 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% % NH White est 76% 80% 44% 85% 86% 78% % NH Black est 2% 1% 0% 0% 1% 1% ACS Pop Est Total 7,200 7,281 6,933 6,612 7,003 35,029 age0-19 31% 26% 30% 22% 26% 27% age20-60 53% 59% 57% 60% 58% 58% age60plus 16% 15% 12% 17% 16% 15% immigrants 25% 14% 26% 12% 12% 18% naturalized 50% 60% 25% 61% 59% 47% english 62% 79% 50% 84% 84% 72% spanish 25% 11% 48% 9% 8% 20% asian-lang 5% 4% 2% 4% 3% 3% other lang 9% 5% 1% 3% 6% 5% Language Fluency Speaks Eng "Less than Very Well"16% 9% 22% 5% 6% 12% hs-grad 42% 57% 56% 48% 48% 50% bachelor 27% 25% 12% 33% 29% 25% graduatedegree 15% 8% 4% 14% 18% 12% Child in Household child-under18 41% 34% 41% 34% 39% 38% Pct of Pop Age 16+ employed 62% 65% 63% 67% 68% 65% income 0-25k 9% 5% 13% 4% 4% 7% income 25-50k 9% 14% 24% 10% 8% 13% income 50-75k 14% 16% 22% 9% 12% 15% income 75-200k 45% 55% 39% 58% 56% 51% income 200k-plus 22% 10% 2% 18% 20% 15% single family 91% 95% 52% 89% 98% 86% multi-family 9% 5% 48% 11% 2% 14% rented 24% 21% 63% 16% 14% 27% owned 76% 79% 37% 84% 86% 73% Total population data from the 2010 Decennial Census. Surname-based Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database. Latino voter registration and turnout data are Spanish-surname counts adjusted using Census Population Department undercount estimates. NH White and NH Black registration and turnout counts estimated by NDC. Citizen Voting Age Pop., Age, Immigration, and other demographics from the 2012-2016 American Community Survey and Special Tabulation 5-year data. Housing Stats Household Income Education (among those age 25+) Total Pop City of Moorpark - Map 515 Language spoken at home 6,884 Immigration Citizen Voting Age Pop Age Voter Registration (Nov 2016) Voter Turnout (Nov 2016) Voter Turnout (Nov 2014) 54 55 District 1 2345Total Ideal Total Pop 7,007 6,894 6,824 6,945 6,751 34,421 Deviation from ideal 123 10 -60 61 -133 256 % Deviation 1 79% 0 15% -0 87% 0 89% -1 93% 3 72% % Hisp 17% 30% 75% 15% 21% 31% % NH White 68% 59% 19% 72% 67% 57% % NH Black 2% 2% 1% 2% 2% 2% % Asian-American 11% 8% 3% 10% 9% 8% Total 5,042 4,982 3,312 4,912 5,229 23,476 % Hisp 11% 18% 57% 13% 19% 21% % NH White 75% 70% 39% 73% 73% 68% % NH Black 0% 3% 1% 3% 1% 2% % Asian/Pac Isl 12% 8% 3% 10% 6% 8% Total 4,456 4,848 2,499 4,594 4,175 20,573 % Latino est 32% 36% 50% 31% 35% 35% % Spanish-Surnamed 5% 4% 3% 5% 4% 4% % Asian-Surnamed 42% 36% 22% 44% 39% 38% % Filipino-Surnamed 21% 23% 24% 20% 21% 22% % NH White est 5% 6% 5% 5% 5% 5% % NH Black 15% 22% 54% 12% 18% 22% Total 3,759 3,976 1,845 3,958 3,518 17,056 % Latino est 32% 37% 52% 31% 36% 36% % Spanish-Surnamed 5% 3% 4% 4% 3% 4% % Asian-Surnamed 44% 37% 22% 46% 40% 40% % Filipino-Surnamed 19% 21% 21% 19% 19% 20% % NH White est 5% 6% 4% 4% 5% 5% % NH Black 14% 22% 52% 12% 18% 20% Total 2,329 1,795 798 2,408 2,067 9,397 % Latino est 13% 15% 46% 10% 14% 16% % Spanish-Surnamed 12% 13% 41% 9% 13% 14% % Asian-Surnamed 5% 3% 4% 3% 3% 4% % Filipino-Surnamed 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% % NH White est 80% 80% 45% 84% 78% 78% % NH Black est 1% 1% 0% 1% 0% 1% ACS Pop Est Total 7,158 7,064 6,899 7,042 6,866 35,029 age0-19 25% 26% 32% 27% 25% 27% age20-60 57% 59% 56% 57% 59% 58% age60plus 18% 15% 12% 16% 16% 15% immigrants 16% 14% 30% 18% 12% 18% naturalized 57% 60% 26% 60% 49% 47% english 76% 79% 45% 76% 81% 72% spanish 15% 11% 50% 12% 13% 20% asian-lang 4% 4% 3% 3% 3% 3% other lang 5% 5% 2% 9% 2% 5% Language Fluency Speaks Eng "Less than Very Well"8% 9% 26% 10% 6% 12% hs-grad 47% 57% 49% 47% 52% 50% bachelor 30% 25% 13% 30% 26% 25% graduatedegree 15% 8% 5% 16% 15% 12% Child in Household child-under18 37% 34% 44% 37% 38% 38% Pct of Pop Age 16+ employed 64% 65% 64% 66% 67% 65% income 0-25k 6% 5% 13% 8% 6% 7% income 25-50k 10% 14% 23% 7% 12% 13% income 50-75k 11% 16% 21% 16% 11% 15% income 75-200k 50% 55% 40% 51% 56% 51% income 200k-plus 23% 10% 4% 19% 15% 15% single family 89% 95% 65% 96% 80% 86% multi-family 11% 5% 35% 4% 20% 14% rented 20% 21% 56% 16% 28% 27% owned 80% 79% 44% 84% 72% 73% Total population data from the 2010 Decennial Census. Surname-based Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database. Latino voter registration and turnout data are Spanish-surname counts adjusted using Census Population Department undercount estimates. NH White and NH Black registration and turnout counts estimated by NDC. Citizen Voting Age Pop., Age, Immigration, and other demographics from the 2012-2016 American Community Survey and Special Tabulation 5-year data. Housing Stats Household Income Education (among those age 25+) Total Pop City of Moorpark - Map 519 Language spoken at home 6,884 Immigration Citizen Voting Age Pop Age Voter Registration (Nov 2016) Voter Turnout (Nov 2016) Voter Turnout (Nov 2014) 56 57 District 1 2345Total Ideal Total Pop 6,661 6,894 7,219 6,896 6,751 34,421 Deviation from ideal -223 10 335 12 -133 558 % Deviation -3 24% 0 15% 4 87% 0 17% -1 93% 8 11% % Hisp 18% 30% 71% 16% 21% 31% % NH White 67% 59% 23% 72% 67% 57% % NH Black 2% 2% 1% 2% 2% 2% % Asian-American 11% 8% 4% 9% 9% 8% Total 4,713 4,982 3,601 4,951 5,229 23,476 % Hisp 12% 18% 51% 14% 19% 21% % NH White 74% 70% 42% 74% 73% 68% % NH Black 1% 3% 1% 2% 1% 2% % Asian/Pac Isl 12% 8% 5% 9% 6% 8% Total 4,210 4,848 2,791 4,548 4,175 20,573 % Latino est 32% 36% 48% 31% 35% 35% % Spanish-Surnamed 6% 4% 4% 5% 4% 4% % Asian-Surnamed 42% 36% 24% 44% 39% 38% % Filipino-Surnamed 21% 23% 23% 20% 21% 22% % NH White est 5% 6% 5% 5% 5% 5% % NH Black 15% 22% 50% 12% 18% 22% Total 3,546 3,976 2,097 3,918 3,518 17,056 % Latino est 33% 37% 49% 31% 36% 36% % Spanish-Surnamed 5% 3% 4% 4% 3% 4% % Asian-Surnamed 43% 37% 25% 46% 40% 40% % Filipino-Surnamed 19% 21% 21% 19% 19% 20% % NH White est 5% 6% 4% 4% 5% 5% % NH Black 14% 22% 47% 12% 18% 20% Total 2,193 1,795 942 2,400 2,067 9,397 % Latino est 13% 15% 40% 10% 14% 16% % Spanish-Surnamed 12% 13% 36% 9% 13% 14% % Asian-Surnamed 5% 3% 4% 3% 3% 4% % Filipino-Surnamed 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% % NH White est 80% 80% 51% 84% 78% 78% % NH Black est 1% 1% 1% 1% 0% 1% ACS Pop Est Total 6,811 7,064 7,294 6,994 6,866 35,029 age0-19 25% 26% 32% 27% 25% 27% age20-60 57% 59% 56% 57% 59% 58% age60plus 18% 15% 12% 16% 16% 15% immigrants 16% 14% 30% 17% 12% 18% naturalized 56% 60% 28% 60% 49% 47% english 75% 79% 46% 78% 81% 72% spanish 15% 11% 48% 11% 13% 20% asian-lang 4% 4% 3% 3% 3% 3% other lang 5% 5% 3% 8% 2% 5% Language Fluency Speaks Eng "Less than Very Well"8% 9% 26% 9% 6% 12% hs-grad 47% 57% 48% 47% 52% 50% bachelor 30% 25% 14% 31% 26% 25% graduatedegree 15% 8% 5% 16% 15% 12% Child in Household child-under18 37% 34% 44% 37% 38% 38% Pct of Pop Age 16+ employed 63% 65% 64% 66% 67% 65% income 0-25k 6% 5% 13% 7% 6% 7% income 25-50k 10% 14% 21% 8% 12% 13% income 50-75k 11% 16% 20% 15% 11% 15% income 75-200k 49% 55% 41% 51% 56% 51% income 200k-plus 23% 10% 4% 19% 15% 15% single family 88% 95% 67% 97% 80% 86% multi-family 12% 5% 33% 3% 20% 14% rented 20% 21% 54% 15% 28% 27% owned 80% 79% 46% 85% 72% 73% Total population data from the 2010 Decennial Census. Surname-based Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database. Latino voter registration and turnout data are Spanish-surname counts adjusted using Census Population Department undercount estimates. NH White and NH Black registration and turnout counts estimated by NDC. Citizen Voting Age Pop., Age, Immigration, and other demographics from the 2012-2016 American Community Survey and Special Tabulation 5-year data. Housing Stats Household Income Education (among those age 25+) Total Pop City of Moorpark - Map 520 Language spoken at home 6,884 Immigration Citizen Voting Age Pop Age Voter Registration (Nov 2016) Voter Turnout (Nov 2016) Voter Turnout (Nov 2014) 58 ATTACHMENT 2 CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN ADDITION TO DRAFT MAPS 59 1 Deborah Traffenstedt From:ykueny@roadrunner.com Sent:Friday, January 18, 2019 5:07 PM To:Deborah Traffenstedt Debbie, I'm submitting a second 4 District proposal.Please forward to consultant. District #1‐ Areas  32,33,34,35,36,37,46,47 and 48 with population of 8,692. District #2 ‐ Areas 25,26,27,28,29,,38,39,40,41,42,43,44 and  45 with population of 8995. District # 3 ‐ Areas 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,15 ( except the area on Charles Street  and  adjoining cul de sac streets east of Spring Road; I estimate the population of Area 15 remaining in this proposed District  # 3 to be 374 ),30 and 31 with population of 8236. District # 4 ‐ Areas 12,13,14,15 ( that portion of Area 15 on Charles  Street and adjoining cul de sac streets east of Spring Road; I estimate the population in this area to be 358 ) ,  16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23 and 24 with population of 8492.  Please add the following to the  COMMENT section   to be  shown  on web site : Of the two proposals I've submitted I prefer this one because  1) the Districts are compact and  recognize the historic geographic areas of the city; and 2) the number and location of residential units completed after  2010 Census date of April1,2010 and projected to be completed by 2020 Census date of April 1,2020 would allow this  4  district map to be easily adjusted to recognize the added population by adding Area 31  which had no added residential  units with  current  estimated population of 548 to District #1  ( removed from District # 3 ) for estimated total 2020  population of 9240. District # 2  add estimated 576 people to Area # 29 for total  estimated 2020  population  of 9571.  District # 3 add estimated population of 790 to Area #1, add estimated population of 1504 to Areas 6,7 and 15; remove  Area 31 and place it in District # 1 ,and remove Areas 8 and 9 and place them in District # 4 for estimated   2020        population of 9293. District # 4 add Areas 8 and 9 plus  combined estimated population increase of 170 for estimated  2020 population of 9293.                    Thanks, Steve Kueny.  60 Deborah Traffenstedt From: Sent: To: Subject: City council folks, John Allred <johnnythea2012 @yahoo.com> Wednesday, January 16, 2019 10:29 PM City Council & City Manager Mayoral election process Please consider my opposition to changing our mayoral election process. First, I am dismayed at our having to transition to council districts. There is a very real risk of developing an "us versus them" attitude in our city where none, to my knowledge at least, exists now. In addition this change makes it easier for outside, potentially partisan, groups to impact our election process because each district instantly requires one fourth the cost for paid "canvassers", ad campaigns, or political groups to impact. Having said that I understand your decision to accept the change to districting council member seats. Our city just didn't have the resources to fight a losing legal battle. With that in mind it becomes even more important that the mayoral seat remain a directly elected position. It isn't hard to imagine a scenario where one part of the city feels disenfranchised with the council's mayoral selection (or other decisions) because council members from "other'' council districts voted a certain way. We could see perceived negative divisions of our populace based on race or wealth. These divisions do not exist NOW in Moorpark but there are groups of agitators outside our city that profit (politically) by dividing people into groups. I believe these "agitators" are the ones who imposed the districting of our council seats in the first place. A directly elected mayor will be able to serve as an arbiter between any possible perception of sectarian (us versus them) feelings because he/she will be elected by and represent the entire city rather than the council districts that voted for he/she. Things are pretty harmonious now in Moorpark but future councils may have to make very tough decisions. The perception of "cabal" making decisions in a smoke-filled room could materialize. We NEED a mayor that represents the entire city to maintain faith in our city government. For the above reasons please do not vote to change our mayoral election process. Thank you John Allred 11833 Harvester Street 1 61 Deborah Traffenstedt From: Sent: To: Subject: mauriellol@juno.com Wednesday, January 16, 2019 2:46 PM City Council & City Manager City-wide Mayor To whom it may concern re: districting the city for elections. I understand that there is a movement afoot to change the Mayor's election procedure from city-wide voting to election of the Mayor by City Council members. I AM OPPOSED TO THAT! I want the ability to elect the person who is going to represent me and Moorpark in County-wide decisions that will affect Moorpark. When I'm unhappy with the mayor I want the ability to vote him/her out and not depend on City council members who may have "an axe to grind" I want the Mayor's office to be elected on a city-wide basis, not by City council members. Ralph Mauriello 4241 Peersimmon St. Moorpark, CA93021 805 5289-5258 mauriello l@juno.com 1 62 Deborah Traffenstedt From: Sent: To: Subject: Elizabeth Groden < ejgroden@yahoo.com > Monday, January 14, 2019 8:15 PM Deborah Traffenstedt Re: Moorpark Needs to Have a Mayor My name is Elizabeth Groden. I have been a Moorpark resident since 2002. I believe it is important for Moorpark to continue to have a Mayor. A Mayor provides City-wide leadership, addresses City-wide infrastructure and other City needs (present and future), and is there to spearhead and effect City government. A Mayor provides important leadership-not only within the City, but in representing the City to the outside world. A mayor can network with and reach out to other Mayors/Cities in identifying common goals, problems, and solutions going forward. Moorpark should definitely continue to have a Mayor-for all of the above reasons, and more. It is essential. Elizabeth Groden 14164 Huron Court Moorpark, CA 1 63 Deborah Traffenstedt From: Sent: To: Subject: Dieter Wolf <4dwolf@gmail.com > Monday, December 24, 2018 11:48 AM Deborah Traffenstedt One Mayor Please A rotating mayor position does not have the same weight as a directly elected mayor. Not all councilmembers want to be mayor or have time. One Moorpark with one Mayor. Regards Dieter Wolf 1 64 Deborah Traffenstedt From: Sent: To: Subject: Hello, Joan Johnson <joanjohnson1022 @gmail.com > Saturday, December 29, 2018 4:19 PM Deborah Traffenstedt District-based elections As I have heard of the 4 districts vs. 5 districts issue, I wanted to share that I believe the 4 districts retaining the at-large mayor is the better choice. A rotating mayor position would not be as effective as an elected mayor. I urge those involved to choose the 4 districts with at-large mayor option. Best wishes, Joan Joan Johnson 3834 Hidden Pine Court Moorpark, CA 93021 Joanjohnson1022@gmail.com Cell: 805-390-4832 1 65 Deborah Traffenstedt From: Sent: To: Subject: Ms. Traffenstedt, Wendy <wendelyn64@gmail.com> Sunday, December 16, 2018 4:41 PM Deborah Traffenstedt City of Moorpark I understand that you are involved in the process to create districts for the City Council. I wanted to voice my opinion about the process and the fact that I want the Mayoral position to remain a separate, all district, elected position. I want to elect my Mayor. I do not want the Council of 5 to have to "share" the position based on their decision. When I choose a City Council member to elect from those running, I choose that person based on their knowledge of the community, dedication to the position, efforts and volunteerism in our community and other factors. I know the Mayoral position takes a unique dedication of time, effort, leadership and skills. I do not think that all of our Council members would make a quality mayor and when we vote by district, the potential candidate pool may even render more individuals who aren't deeply qualified to be Mayor. Furthermore, I do not want to create the potential for a combative relationship among the council members as evidenced back in Moorpark's history where infighting caused us to have 3 Mayors in one night. I think there is no possible positive that pits the 5 members against each other for a coveted position. I encourage each of them to risk their 4 year seat to run for a 2 year position if it really means that much to them. And, in the past few elections, no council member has chosen to risk their 4 year seat for the 2 year Mayoral position. As a resident of Moorpark, I have watched how our elected leaders have worked together and effectively been inclusive of all parts of our city. As a resident of a variety of different neighborhoods around the city, I have never felt my region was neglected or singled out in favor of another. That is due to the power of our voice at City Hall and the fact that every voice matters. Please hear this voice who looks at this matter as a concerned citizen and not someone with an agenda of any type. I love our city and support the independence of our uniquely citizen voted Mayor and individually elected city council members. Please retain that separation and distinction. Thank you, Wendy Rokos, M.Ed. Sent from my iPhone 1 66 Deborah Traffenstedt From: Sent: To: Subject: Lise Houston < lisehouston@roadrunner.com > Sunday, December 16, 2018 12:06 PM Deborah Traffenstedt opinions We have lived in Moorpark since 1994. We prefer one district and one mayor, but since we have no choice in this re- districting scenario, we would like to say that 4 districts and 1 at large mayor is preferred over 5 districts and a rotating mayor which is simply a stupid idea. Thanks, Richard and Lise Houston 1 67 Deborah Traffenstedt From: Sent: To: Subject: Scott & Caron <campnow@gmail.com > Sunday, December 16, 2018 11:19 AM Deborah Traffenstedt Mayor Position As we transition to Districts voting for our city council with the intention of improving diversity I understand there is a movement to eliminate the City Mayor position and have it be a rotating position. I would strongly oppose a change of the directly elected Mayor position by the whole community of Moorpark. Please maintain the directly elected Mayor position. Thank you, Scott Campbell 1 68 Deborah Traffenstedt From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: To whom it may concern, William Munsch <william.munsch@att.net> Saturday, December 15, 2018 7:25 AM Deborah Traffenstedt Van Dam Mark Elected Mayor and District based Council Members As a resident of Moorpark for over 17 years I have seen many elections. I believe that the prior system of generally elected Council Members was effective and served all of Moorpark well. However, I completely understand the move toward districts to represent the potentially underrepresented equally. I also recognize the legal issue that drove us to that position. That comes with a But. Gerrymandering becomes a risk that can entrench misrepresentation. Independent protection needs to be in place to help prevent that. Regardless, the district approach narrows the populace within a particular district that a Council Member can be chosen from, especially in a small city like Moorpark. So, the variability in experience and time availability increases. The Mayor position is different. It should be a position that represents all of Moorpark and not just a honorary handoff between Council Members. I would expect the Mayor to be much more visible and to dedicate more time to the position than the average Council Member. The Mayor is the face of the city, both in side and outside the city limits. Handing it around the Council Members dilutes that image. The time commitment needs to be something that a candidate wants to accept. If the average Council Member is not able to commit that time and/or does not have the experience and personality for the job, then the position looses effectiveness. My recommendation is to leave the Mayor as a generally elected position. Thank you for your time, Bill Munsch Sent from my iPhone 1 69 Deborah Traffenstedt From: Sent: To: Subject: pamela recupito <danceten@sbcglobal.net> Friday, December 14, 2018 6:20 PM City Council & City Manager Hi There I personally like electing a mayor for Moorpark during elections. I don't like the idea of rotation. A mayor' s position in my opinion is different from a council member and very select few could do the job properly. Thank goodness for Mayor Janice Parvin who has been gracious to stay on as Mayor and continue to have class and dignity representing our community. Mayor is very challenging difficult job and very very time consuming. Thank you, Pam Rossi Owner and Director for 2 7 years Pam Rossi's Dance Ten 1 70 Deborah Traffen·stedt From: Sent: To: Subject: Debbie, mauriellol@juno.com Friday, December 14, 2018 5:41 PM Deborah Traffenstedt Districting for City Council We believe we should have 4 districts for 4 city council members and elect the mayor at large. The mayor's job is much more significant than a council member. The mayor not only is at all council meetings, but also represents us at regional and county meetings. Ralph and June Mauriello 1 71 Deborah Traffenstedt From: Sent: To: Subject: Ms. Traffenstedt, Mark Van Dam <vandamage@roadrunner.com> Friday, December 14, 2018 3:39 PM Deborah Traffenstedt supports elected mayor Please accept this email in support of keeping an elected mayor. The mayor must represent the entire city and not just a specific district. The reasons for doing so are many. I will share my thoughts at an appropriate council meeting. Sincerely, Mark Van Dam 1 72 Deborah Traffenstedt From: Sent: To: Subject: Hi Debra, Bruce A Hamous < bhamous@naicapital.com > Friday, December 14, 2018 12:28 PM Deborah Traffenstedt 5 districts proposal I would be opposed to getting 5 districts instead of just 4. I believe an elected Mayor every 2 years serves not just one district but the entire city and everyone in all districts have the opportunity to vote for that person. Please show my vote to keep the Mayor as an open elected position. Thanks Bruce A Hamous, CCIM I Vice President 2555 Townsgate Rd. #320. Westlake Village, CA 91361 bhamous@naicapital com I CalBRE Lie# 01073432 Direct 805-277-4023 I Office 805-446-2400 x 4023 Mobile 818-636-8600 I Fax 805-446-2401 Bio I vCard I My Listings I Research I naicapital.com I NAI Global I 7,000+ Professionals I 400+ Offices I 425M+ SF Property Managed HAI capital If this email 1s with regards to a transaction, 1nformat1on and/or opinions expressed herein have been provided by a principal or principals 1n the transaction, their representative or representatives or other third party sources No warranty as to the accuracy or completeness of the information and/or opinions or capability of the 1nd1v1dual prov1d1ng such information and/or opinions 1s intended Such information and/or opinions should be independently 1nvest1gated and evaluated and may not be a basis for llab1l1ty of NAI Capital, Inc or its agents CalBRE Lie No 01990696 1 73 Deborah Traffenstedt From: Sent: To: Subject: To Whom It May Concern: Debbie Lee <debbielee4reverse@gmail.com > Friday, December 14, 2018 10:44 AM Deborah Traffenstedt voting districts I am voicing my opinion as a Moorpark resident, thank you for allowing me to do so. While I am not happy about the "district" voting issue, I believe the 4 separate districts and a mayor at large is best for our community. I do NOT like a 5 district possibility with a "rotating" mayor. The position of Mayor needs to be one who is specifically interested in that position, has the skillset required to be Mayor and the scheduling availability. Most Council members have full time positions to earn an income for their families, and being an ad hoc Mayor on a rotating basis is a HUGE fail for our community. Thank you Debbie Lee 805.402.0176 1 74 Deborah Traffenstedt From: Sent: To: Subject: Ms. Traffenstedt, Bruce Rokos < brokos@voguesigns.com > Friday, December 14, 2018 10:30 AM Deborah Traffenstedt Redistricting and the Mayoral position I understand that you are involved in the process to create districts for the City Council. I wanted to voice my opinion about the process and the fact that I want the Mayoral position to remain a separate, all district, elected position. I want to elect my Mayor. I do not want the Council of 5 to have to "share" the position based on their decision. When I choose a City Council member to elect from those running, I choose that person based on their knowledge of the community, dedication to the position, efforts and volunteerism in our community and other factors. I know the Mayoral position takes a unique dedication of time, effort, leadership and skills. I do not think that all of our Council members would make a quality mayor and when we vote by district, the potential candidate pool may even render more individuals who aren't deeply qualified to be Mayor. Furthermore, I do not want to create the potential for a combative relationship among the council members as evidenced back in Moorpark's history where infighting caused us to have 3 Mayors in one night. I think there is no possible positive that pits the 5 members against each other for a coveted position. I encourage each of them to risk their 4 year seat to run for a 2 year position if it really means that much to them. And, in the past few elections, no council member has chosen to risk their 4 year seat for the 2 year Mayoral position. As a 33 year resident of Moorpark, I have watched how our elected leaders have worked together and effectively been inclusive of all parts of our city. As a resident of a variety of different neighborhoods around the city, I have never felt my region was neglected or singled out in favor of another. That is due to the power of our voice at City Hall and the fact that every voice matters. Please hear this voice who looks at this matter as a concerned citizen and not someone with an agenda of any type. I love our city and support the independence of our uniquely citizen voted Mayor and individually elected city council members. Please retain that separation and distinction. Thank you, Bruce Rokos Moorpark, CA 805-320-2094 [3j. Virus-free. www.avast.com 1 75 Deborah Traffenstedt From: Sent: To: Subject: Sergott, Tania (US -Stamford) <tsergott@deloitte.com > Friday, December 14, 2018 10:.01 AM Deborah Traffenstedt District-based elections & elected mayor I wanted to send an email to comment on the proposal to not have an elected mayor who represents the entire city of Moorpark. While I understand the rationale behind moving to a district-based election system (as Moorpark is quite geographically differentiated related to socio-economic representation), I do not understand why we would not continue to elect a mayor, and why we wouldn't have one central person to put the needs of our entire community first -to consider our community as a whole. Please send me any information you may have contrary to my opinions on the future of the position of mayor in our small town -I am always open to learn about others' views, because you may have more information that would educate me towards a different view! Kind regards, Tania Tania DeSilva Sergott Audit Managing Director I National Office, Audit & Assurance Services Deloitte & Touche LLP Tel/Direct: +1 805 532 0043 I Mobile: -l .'03 329 3040 tsergott@delo1tte.com I \NWW..Q~Q1tt~.c::om Deloitte This message (including any attachments) contains confidential information intended for a specific individual and purpose, and is protected by law. If you are not the intended recipient, you should delete this message and any disclosure, copying, or distribution of this message, or the taking of any action based on it, by you is strictly prohibited. v.E.l 1 76 Deborah Traffenstedt From: Sent: To: Subject: To the City of Moorpark, I am in favor of having one'elected :Mayor. Sue FitzGerald <sue_53@hotmail.com> Friday, December 14, 2018 8:56 AM Deborah Traffenstedt Elected Mayor position We need one person to represent ALL of Moorpark, not just a small segment. One person consistently in the position of Mayor is more effective overall. It only stands to reason that if a person is in a position for a length of time, they have more working knowledge of the whole. Not all council members want to be Mayor or hold that position and may be out of their comfort zone doing so. Mayor Parvin has always put in the time and effort to make Moorpark the best city it can be. Keeping the elected mayor is very important to me and our city. Thank you, Sue FitzGerald 1 77 Deborah Traffenstedt From: Sent: To: Subject: Dear Ms. Traffenstedt Cosenza, Michael < mcosenza@callutheran.edu > Sunday, December 09, 2018 8:35 PM Deborah Traffenstedt Dec. 12 Public Hearing I am unable to attend the public hearing on 12/12/18 regarding the District Composition Plan but would like to express my views to the City Council through this email. The current plan will create 4 districts for city council members and one "at large" position for City Mayor. Instead I recommend the creation of 5 districts. In my view, the diverse populations of the city will be better represented through the creation of 5 districts and eliminating the "at large" position of Mayor. For the position of Mayor, I support the model where the 5 council members select the mayor which was the procedure when the city was first incorporated. Thank you for considering my request. Michael Cosenza, EdD 6936 Shadow Wood Drive Moorpark, CA 93021 Dr. Michael N. Cosenza I Associate Professor and Director of Professional Development Schools IDept. of Leaming and Teaching I Graduate School of Education 60 West Olsen Road #4100 I Thousand Oaks, CA 91360 p 805.493.3595 I r 805.493.3924 President-elect, NAPDS Past President, SCPDS 1 78 Deborah Traffenstedt From: Sent: To: Subject: Attachments: Diane, Deborah Traffenstedt Tuesday, November 20, 2018 3:12 PM 'Diane Walters' RE: HOA Map 2018-11-20 Moorpark HOA Boundary Map.pdf Attached is a map showing the HOA areas in Moorpark. We can't guarantee that this 100% accurate, because we do not have all of the documents that are filed with the State Department of Real Estate for the various HOA's, but the attached map shows our general understanding of the HOA boundaries. As an example, there may be variations for the open space areas included in the HOA boundaries. Also, we showed only the master HOA for Moorpark Highlands. There are also multiple neighborhood HOA's in addition to the master HOA for that planned community. Let me know if I can help you with anything else. Deborah Traffenstedt Assistant City Manager City of l\loorpark I 799 Moorpark Aw. I ~loorpark, CA 9:3021 (805) 517-6213 I fax: (805) 532-2525 I dtraffenstedt@moorparkca.gov www .moorparkca.gov -----Original Message----- From: Diane Walters [mailto:iskidewl@yahoo.com] Sent: Monday, November 19, 2018 8:30 AM To: Deborah Traffenstedt Subject: HOA map 1. Precincts will likely be redrawn, so not a factor. Thanks for that info. 2. I can go to Moorpark Unified to get school map. This was a major factor in the map that will likely be adopted in Simi Valley. Maybe this area of interest does not apply in our community. 79 3. Will wait to receive HOA map from you. HOAs appear to be major area of interest since there are so many in our community. Thanks Deborah! Sent from my iPhone 2 80 / \ -I i I I \ f ,,,, . ..... \ .-' I ) ~-. _; / / '· r t. I t I " -· .. ! ,. ; I City ot Moorparll: HOA Bounoanes I I " .. \ J .. / / .... / -., <::.Jfl -. r-:iJ /; --· ...-· 11 . l I --- 11120/2011 ... 81 Deborah Traffen stedt From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Attachments : Diane , Deborah Traffenstedt Friday, November 16, 2018 5:49 PM 'Diane Walters' Troy Brown RE: 11/15/18 Emails regarding District- Based Elections 2018-1113 Public Hearing Moorpark Intro to Districting.pptx; Moorpark Unified School District Boundary .pdf Just wanted to let you know that I'm working on getting you a up-to-date map with the HOA boundaries and will send it via a separate email when complete d . I have attached an MUSD boundary map (see the MUSD website for an interactive map : https://betalocator.decisioninsite.com/?StudylD=85026 ). The MUSD boundary map is not really applicable to the City Council member districts, because that boundary extends outside the City limits. We do not currently have a map showing the attendance boundary for each of the MUSD elementary and middle schools, although the MUSD interactive online map shows the distance to the closest school when an address is entered. MUSD does allow and encourage a school of choice selection, so the attendance boundaries are not necessarily significant. For example, I live in Mountain Meadows, but my children attended Walnut Canyon School. If you want me to see if I can obtain a map from MUSD showi ng individual school attendance boundaries, let me know . In regard to your question about viewing current election precinct maps, we would need to purchase those from the County of Ventura , but I do not believe the current election precincts are applicable to the formation of new City Councilmember election districts. After the new City of Moorpark Councilmember district map is approved by ordinance by the City, the County of Ventura election precinct maps will be revised accordingly. For example , Section 12222 of the State Elections Code includes the following requirement : 12222. (a) No (2recinct shall be established so that its boundar crosses the boundaey of any supervisorial district, congressional district, senatorial district Assembly district, board of equalization district, judicial district, i ncorporated city , ward, or it):'. council district . I have attached a copy of the PowerPoint from the November 13 public hearing. Suggested slides to review in the attached file include : Slide 5, which shows traditional redistricting principles that may be considered; Slide 7, which sh ows the areas in the City with a high Latino population concentration; and Slide 8, which further defines a community of interest. 1 82 Regarding your question about the deadline to submit a map , our demographer has to release to the public draft maps no later than January 16, 2019 , wh ich is one week prior to the first public hearing on District Map(s) and Sequencing on January 23 , 2019 . Th is means that you should consider i n it ially subm itting any map suggest ions before the demographer produces the maps to be released on January 16. Comments on draft map(s) will then continue to be received through the public hearing process for District Maps and Sequencing (January 23 and February 6). I will be sending you an HOA map when it is completed . District map suggestions should be submitted to : districtelections@moorparkca.gov or mailed to the City of Moorpark, Attention District Elect ions , 799 Moorpark Avenue , Moorpark, CA 93021. Deborah Traffenstedt Assistant City Manager City of Moorpark I 799 Moorpark Ave. I Moorpark, CA 93021 (805) 517-6213 I fax: (805) 532-2525 I dtraffenstedt@ moorparkca.gov www.moorparkca.gov -----Origi na I Message ----- From : Diane Walters [mailto :i skidewl@yahoo.com ] Sent: Thursday, November 15 , 2018 9 :09 AM To : Deborah Traffenstedt Subject : School District Maps Do you have school district maps that can be posted as well? Sent from my iPhone >On Nov 15, 2018, at 7 :47 AM , Diane Walters <iskidewl@yahoo.com> wrote : > > Dear Deborah, >Three quest ions : > > l.Does city have precinct maps that can be posted on city website? > > 2. Does city have HOA map s that can be posted on city website? > > 3. What date is the deadline for public to submit maps? > > I believe where HOAs & precincts are located should also be considered for determining sensible district maps . > >Thanks > >Sent from my i Phone 2 83 NDC National Demographics Corporation • I November 13, 2018 City of Moorpark Introduction to Districting ~4"". ?!":: " ('T -~--c--.--~• -,.-,-,---~ • --~--~ -O • ...,,,, " --· ----,-~ ?___,... ~~ -~ 1 ,, • j ~ ~ "<c.;, --J -. I ~ • • • I ~-; • -i ~;;~·:,'.,,~.~.: .• ·~---. • ,; ·-·-. -. -' -_j 84 NOC California Voting Rights Act (CVRA) Na ti onal Dem ogra phics Corporation -o Under the Federal Voting Rights Act (passed in 1965), a jurisdiction must fail 4 factual tests before it is in violation of the law. o The California VRA makes it significantly easier for plaintiffs to force jurisdictions into "by-district" election systems by eliminating two of the US Supreme Court Gingles tests: Can the protected class constitute the majority of a district? Does the protected class vote as a bloc? Do the voters who are not in the protected class vote in a bloc to defeat the preferred candidates of the protected class? Do the "totality of circumstances" indicate race is a factor in elections? o Liability is now determined only by the presence of racially polarized . voting 0vembe1 13, 2018 85 NOC CVRA Impact National Demographics Corporation -o Switched (or in the process of switching) as a result of CVRA: At least 17 5 school districts 28 Community College Districts 100+ cities 1 County Board of Supervisors 10 water and other special districts. ovember 13 , 2018 o I<.e y settlements: a Palmdale: $4. 7 million Modesto: $3 million Highland: $1. 3 million Anaheim: $1.1 million Whittier: $1 million Santa Barbara: $600,000 Tulare Hospital: $500,000 Madera Unified: about $170,000 Hanford Joint Union Schools: $118,000 Merced City: $42,000 86 NOC Districting Process National De mographics Corporation Step Two Initial Hearings Nov. 13 & Dec. 12 Release draft maps Two hearings on draft maps Jan. 9or16 & Feb. 6or13 Map adoption Feb. 6or13 & Feb. 13 or 20 ovember 13 , 2018 Description Held prior to release of draft maps. Education and to solicit input on the communities in the District. Maps must be posted at least 7 days prior to 3rd hearing. Two meetings to discuss and revise the draft maps and to discuss the election sequence. Map adopted via ordinance. Final map must be posted at least 7 days prior to adoption. 87 NDC Districting Rules National Demographics Corporation overnber 13, 2018 88 ND c National D em ographics Corporation I -De lllographic Sullllllary of the four districts must Each cont ain about 8,605 residents. Novembe r 13 , 2018 R ace/Ethnic Profil e Total Population Latino NH White NH Black / African-American NH Native American NH Asian -American NH Pacific Islander NH Other NH Multi-Race Citizen VAP total CVAP Latino CVAP NH White CV AP NH African-American CV AP NH Asian & Pacific Islander CVAP Other Voter Registration (Nov. 2016) Latino Reg Asian-Surnamed Reg . Filipino-Surnamed Reg. Est. NH White Reg. Est. African-Amer. Reg Democratic Reg. Republican Reg. Other/No Party Reg . Voters Casting Ballots (Nov. 2016) Latino voters A sian -Surnamed voters Filipino-Surnamed voters Est. NH White voters Est. African -Amer. Reg Democratic voters Republican voters Other/No Party voters Count Percent 34,421 10,813 31 % 19,654 57 % 600 2% 213 1% 2,840 8% 74 0% 89 0% 138 0% 23,476 4,970 21 % 15,951 68 % 373 2% 1,944 8% 239 1% 20,573 4,427 22 % 883 4% 209 1% 14,501 70 % 297 1% 7,268 35 % 7,823 38 % 5,482 27 % 17,056 3,485 20 % 693 4% 165 1% 12,256 72 % 252 1% 6,128 36 % 6,741 40 % 4,187 25 % ACS Profil e Count Percent ACS Total Population 35,029 2% Immigrant 6,257 18 % Naturalized (pct of total immigrants) 2,940 47 % Age 5+ 32,993 Speak English at home 23,694 72 % Speak Spanish at home 6,564 20 % Speak an A sian language at home 1,139 3% Speak other language at h o me 1,595 5% Speak English only "well" or less 3,810 12 % Age 25+ 22,855 Age 25+, no HS degree 2,884 13 % Age 25+, HS degree (only) 11,469 50 % Age 25+, bachelor degree (only) 5,776 25 % Age 25+, graduate degree (only) 2,727 12 % Households 10,584 Chi ld under 18 in Household 3,993 38 % Income $0-25k 759 7% Income $25 -50k 1,336 13 % Income $50-75k 1,541 15 % Income $75-200k 5,389 51 % Income $200k+ 1,558 15 % Housing units 10,981 Single-Family 9,455 86 % Multi -Fami ly 1,526 14% Rented 2,811 27 % Owned 7,772 73 % Voters Casting Ballots (Nov. 2014) 9,397 46 % Latino voters 1,475 16 % Asian-S urnamed voters 35 1 4% Fi lipin o-Surnamed voters 83 1% Est. NH White voters 7,297 78 % E s t. African-Amer. Reg 68 1% Democratic voters 3,180 34 % Republican voters 4,383 47 % Other/No Party voters 1,834 20 % 89 NOC Latino Population N ationa l Dem ographics Corporati o n I ---G8bbelf Canyon Chnnl ovembe1 13, 2018 Latinos are particularly concentrated around the center of the city and along Hwy 118. • LatinoCVAP 0% to 25 % 25 % to35% 35% to 50% 50% to 65 % 65 % to 75 % 75 % to 100% Other Asian-Americans and African- Americans are not concentrated anywhere in the city. 90 NOC Defining Communities of Interest National Demographics Corporation tst Question: what is your neighborhood or community of interest? A Community of Interest is generally defined as a neighborhood or community of shared interests, views, problems, or characteristics. Possible community feature/boundary definitions include: o School attendance areas o Natural neighborhood dividing lines, such as highway or major roads, rivers, canals, and/ or hills o Areas around parks and other neighborhood landmarks o Common issues, neighborhood activities, or legislative/ election concerns o Shared demographic characteristics Such as similar levels of income, education, or linguistic isolation zn<l Question: Does a Community of Interest want to be united in one district, or to be divided to have a voice in multiple elections? ovembe1 13, 2018 91 NOC Sample Compact Maps Nationa l Demograph ics Corpora tion City of Compton 20 12 R e districti ng P t.m Ado ted O ct. 23, Compton Ma p Jay n • c::::J lu~JJ)(.ie•I 0 ("1 2J I Limd n uuk Ana ....:,..._ Plpdiuc /P owcr LU 1c b jn r Su ec11 Glendale Unified Examples of highly compact maps, with nooks and jogs driven only by equal population requirements. Novembe1 13, 2018 Areas GUS D F acil iti es Contin untion I l nd ep . (2) .o E lem<ntruy (21) H igh (4) • ~lidd le (4) Oth<r (l 2) 92 NOC Sample Multiple-Representative Maps N ational Dem ographics Corpora tion Examples of maps where a desire to have all members touch downtown (Pasadena) or rural areas (Central), or as many neighborhoods as possible (South Pas), led to policy-driven but non-compact maps. November 13, 2018 ' -· { • if• 93 NDC Map-Drawing Tools National D emographics Corporation o This is your chance to actually draw the map, rather than only commenting on maps drawn by others. o Draw your neighborhood; draw the district you want for your area; or draw an entire citywide map. o You can use the paper map, the Microsoft Excel tool, the online tool, or any other map. ovember 1 3, 2018 94 NOC National Demographics Corporation Ell ovember 1), 2018 Interactive Map Using the One-Page Paper Map City of Moorpark 2018 Districting Public Participation Kit Map An online version of this map that allows you to zoom in and out for more detail is available as a link from the City website. Each number indicates the total population of that "population unit" area. Each district must have essentially equal population. The population of each of the four districts you draw must be close to 8,605, with no more than a 860-person difference between the fargest and smallest. . -.. ... -, I Name: 15 I I Email: P h one: • I • ' l # # # ' ' ' -.0 -8 -J O.kP.,~# ' ''c.• Ma p layers J Ccn1u• Dlocl.: l a ndnnuk Arcu. Pipeline / t'owcr I.i n c -Rllilroad M.i\•cr Stre ett Wattt Arca Pupl"ni t.a 95 NDC Using the Excel tool Enter the district assignment in the highlighted column, and Excel will cal culate the resulting demographic change s. National D emographics Corporati on File Home Insert Draw Paste .X, Cut Ui\Copy <:1 Fo nnat Painter Cl ipboa rd A6 _A_ B 1 2 Oh 3 c Garamond B I D E Page layout -9 . A Font F G Formu las Data Review View Help A t~Wrap Text -~ ~ erg~ &. Cente Alignment H J K L M N 8,605 4 Po p 1-----'T:.::o.::•'1:_1:.:'===-----+---=G:.:nz:=;<>:::>c..\..:' =====""°=--~--'1'"'.o'-''.c..· 20=16=..;I Dts1nct l!tul Tot. ~J-1 N H NH N H NH p ). 1,357 82 IG2 491 15 44G l lis > 305 77 0 11 4 J •)l 12 49 ovember u, L UI~ 48 86 3 1 280 Hl k N I I Asu 29 2 11 0 0 0 17 93 IOI 950 55 107 35J 33 294 I-l as 74 281 I 14 71 26 197 Blk 25 0 Lo.c mio-it•'idlm )it~,..~l'«l lil ·- Asu 82 0 78 A.o .-....""'"""'"''""' ...... 1'-' ..... ,,) ...................... . -hlaJI .. ,. .... ,.w. .... ..... ,,,,..a., ...... . .;; 2i4 29 2GJ -~r... .... 1i... bhno 138 27 127 57 27 2') 2 13 323 370 0 105 .. 53 128 210 1'2 83 4 68 Interactive Map AC ROBAT P Tell me w ha t yo u want to L nd1t1onar Fo . . . . (gj ~ · Moot park k1l Enql1<>h xlsx Excel File Pa ste A3 Home Insert Draw A Cut Ui\copy Garamo nd -<$ Fo rmat Pa int er Cli pboa rd B I ./ fx Page Layou t Formulas · 11 · A. A Font enter you r name h ere _A, __ ~A ____ ~B~---C~-~D~-=E-~F~ Sums by D is trict Assign ed Ide al population : 2 Ci a rk 20 18 Public P artici ation Kit 3 4 enter your 1mn1c here Data Review -~/ G MOS Al ignment H View Hel p ~~ Wnti Text AC RO BAT P Tell me what you want to $ -% ' Number K L 00 •• M Format N 5 ~-------------------~ ~------------------.------------------------~ 6 7 6 9 10 11 12 Group Popuboou Coi mrs Cat('.gory I Unaufoncd Tora! 3 Unassiencd 'J'o 1aJ _ Tu LJ'~c -.Jl.P6_l_s.~-~7l9._~58 ~---_()___ __ 34 .42 ~~ ------~---~------_ u m~ui.o n fr om 1 3-.9 I 197 174 35 3 682 4% lU/o 2% 4o/o 7.93~"• Tt l~J l -i' !Li sp 4,894 . 2,325 2,.25 1 1,34 3 0 10,8 13 59"u 2S°'• 26~... 15°/e ~ N H \'!llt 2,66i ! 4,9-Kl 5.4 17 6,630 O 19,654 J~~., 590;, 62% 74o/o 5i% ___ ,_lJ Blk ·-102 I 169 202 127 0 600 ,__1_•1_._~_2'_/_. ___ 2'_'_·_~_1_o/_.---i ~ 13 ______ __oNco'~~l~A="='--+--=52..=''-11--'8~7l-'-i --'-750'""--~6~9-'-8 -+---'0--t-~4~84~0+--~6-"o~--~l(l'l~V.~·--~9-'<~---'8~%~+------+--8'i-'-V.~o--l 14 Tu1 a!CV ~P -~· 5873 6,421 6,760 0 23.4 76 15 C1nzcn Voong -~-=--1:6;; ! !:COO 1,321 977 0 4,97 0 t--38'i-Y-,-~-1 7-0A-,-~-2 -l '-lo-~-14-. ,-V,-1 16 1\b't: K IT \Vl1l 2,;o 1 I! 3,9.=>9 4,540 5,15 1 0 15,95 1 520 111 17 Po pubtio n >JH Blk 54 194 ___ 2<!__~ 10~ 0 373 l "I• 16 NH As n 340 r 6l I 475 478 0 1,91H 7 1% 76% 3o/11 8% 10"/o 7% 19 ,______ 2 1% 68% 101. 8% Total Reg. 3,56 1 I 5,962 4,922 6,128 20,573 J ~1ino 1 ,~3 1 ~ !.z2 1.5 1,Q_80 702 4,427 40% 200/. 22 % I 11 % 220/o 2 1 Rt•gis lcllio u A s.iJ1 11-Am c..•ri c1ut 172 I 24-0 202 269 U 883 5'% _..o/u 4% I _.,u/u '--__jo/o _ 20 >J°ov. 20 16 22c..... ______ --'-r w=;L,,u~1~0--+--'3~1-~I _1,~·----'5~3~----_-~49~+---o~--+----'2~09-+------'l~'A~·--_.-,.-_l_'A_•___,-,----~1~~~·--t-,.....-l~'A~·-1------+-~1·~~~~ Total Voters 2,773 ! 4,935 4,063 5,285 0 17,056 23 L:u m o 1,052 I 983 8.'18 612 0 3,485 21% 12% 20% 25 Vo h:·cs :\s.ia u-A.J ul.'t:ic1tu 137 j 180 160 2 16 6931---'5~'-'c..• ___ 4~'/oc..• ____ 4~"!.c..• ___ 4~'".o.'-I ~ 24 ~ov. 20 16 38% 2001. 26 _______ ~1~1ili~j p~,u~10_---'~-22_~1 _5_8 ___ 44 ___ 4_1_~---~--16_5~--1 '_~ ____ 1 '_~ ___ 1 '_~_~_1°_~-~-----~-1_"_•~ 27 26 Su b m itter'• Commen ts abou t t h e pla n : 2 9 I ilunk this m:1p m:ikc-s sc-nM" hl"'r-.ms c-. 96 NDC Using the online tool National Demographics Corporation Access Your Online Redistricting Plans -------' and password Login w ith your user n a me Tutorials and help resources are available from the login page. Circled items: 1: controls to move around the map; 2: choose into which district selected territory will be placed; 3: options for how to select territory; 4: demographic summary of districts; 5: demographic change of currently selected area; 6: review map when finished; 7: submit map. November 13, 2018 New user I Forgo t passwo rd I Co ntact Us 174 ?'.H !=!~ 17P. Moorpark version should be ready by Monday, 11/19. _J Population : Change . PopulatlC o -::> r.I Ideal Value --"9"'!,011199'5___ ~ Deviation -3 1,059 % Deviation -100.0% [Hispanic Or igin) Change· [Hispanic Origin) I'. [Hispanic Origin) NH_Wht Chang e • NH_Wht RodrawMap I 97 NDC Public Hearing & Discussion National Demographics Corporation 1. What is your neighborhood or "community of interest"? 2. Do you prefer your neighborhood be kept together in one district or have multiple representatives? 3. What are other communities of interest in the City that should be considered when drafting maps? • o~'embe1 13, 2018 98 1111 Moorpark Unified School District Select Language 'Y To Get Started : Enter your address above. Or Use the button Q to click on the map to tel us where you are Or click 0 on the map to use your current locabon. 0 Explore the map: Chck and drag to pan around. Double Click to zoom 1n . Click on a school view phone number. webpage , and directions. O To p Len side Controls: Change background using Map menu (SateM1 te , terrain , street, etc.). Zoom controls 1n (•)and out (-). (Alternattvety use scroll wheel) Use 0 to Use Your Cum1nt Location Measure dtstance Se lect a language preference 0 To p Right side Contro ls: Open the Map 1n Full Screen • Select a Layer legend: 4 Elementary .C Middle f5 High Map = omis (https:/lwww.mapbox.com() Enter Yo ur A ddress Here Bardldolo Fairview l.agol ' _..,._ ~L --- Happy Coimp Canyon Regional Park O Mapbox (https:/lwww.mapbox.comlabout/maps/) O 0 nStreetMap {http:/lwww.openstreetmap.org/aboutl) -.... •v )) "i; ~) 8~~1 ':J~., , -CJJUD 99 Deborah Traffenstedt From: Sent: To: Subject: Attachments: Diane, Deborah Traffenstedt Friday, November 09, 2018 2:49 PM 'Diane Walters' FW: New District-Based Election Community Meeting Agenda for November 13, 2018, at 6:30 p.m. Moorpark District-Based Elections Fact Sheet & Timeline.pdf See the New Agenda link in the following email for the agenda for the meeting on Tuesday, November 13. The map for drawing will be available at Tuesday's meeting and next week we should then also have the Public Participation Kit map and on line drawing tool available on our website (we are closed on Monday for the holiday). You indicated in your prior email that you didn't find the meet in g schedule on our website, so I have attached that schedule for your convenience. Deborah Traffenstedt Assistant City Manager City of Moorpark I 799 Moorpark Ave . I Moorpark, CA 93021 (805) 517-6213 I fax: (805) 532-2525 I dtraffenstedt@moorparkca.gov www .moorparkca.gov From: District-Based Election Community Meeting [mailto :listserv @civi cplus.com] Sent: Friday, November 09, 2018 11:57 AM To: Deborah Traffenstedt Subject: New District-Based Election Community Meeting Agenda for November 13, 2018, at 6:30 p.m. View this in your browser 1 100 Greetings , This E-mail is sent to notify you that a new item has been posted to a list that you subscribe to . You can access the new item in City Council Agenda through the following link : New Agenda You can find more City Council Agendas , Annotated Agendas , and Videos at the following link : City Council Agendas . Annotated Agendas. and Video Archives The act ions taken by the City Council are available in video format and on the Annotated Agenda within 24 hours following a meeting . You are rec eiving thi s message because yo u are s ubscribed to City Council Agenda on moorparkca.gov. To unsubscribe , click the following link: Unsubscribe 2 101 On October 11 , 2018 , following receipt of a threat of costly litigation , the City Council voted 5-0 to transition the City 's at-large election system to a district-based election system. In a district-based election system , the City is carved into geographic districts . Voters in each district then choose their City Council representative , who must also live in that district. The Mayor would continue to be elected through an at-large election system . November 13. 2018 6:30 PM First Public Hearing on District Composition (Pre-Map Drawing) (Not a City Council meeting) December 12. 2018 6:30 PM Second Public Hearing on District Composition (Pre-Map Drawing) (Not a City Council meeting) Draft Map(s) and Sequencing Released to the Public no later than January 16, 2019. January 23. 2019 6:30 PM First Public Hearing on District Maps and Sequencing (Special City Council meeting) Revised Map(s) and New Draft Maps and Sequencing Released to Public no later than January 30, 2019 February 6. 2019 6:30 PM The City wants your ideas and feedback about how the districts should be drawn. Please attend the events listed to the right and bookmark www.moorparkca .gov/Districts for up-to-date information about the districting process . Second Public Hearing on District Maps and Sequencing , -------------------Introduction of Ordinance (Regular City Council meeting) ------------------- For more information , please contact : Deborah Traffenstedt , Assistant City Manager (805) 517-6213 dtraffenstedt@moorparkca .gov March 6 2019 6:30 PM Fin a I Public Hearing and Adoption of Ordinance (Regular City Council meeting) All meetings at Moorpark City Hall , Apricot Room , 799 Moorpark Ave . Spanish interpreters will be present at all meetings . 102 Deborah Traffenstedt From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Diane, Deborah Traffenstedt Wednesday, November 07, 2018 11:27 AM 'Diane Walters' Brian Chong City of Moorpark District-Based Election Map Drawing I'm really happy to hear that you are interested in participating in the map drawing process. Our contractor, National Demographics Corporation (NOC), is currently working on the map that they are creating for the public participation kit, which map will include population numbers in a grid format for the entire City of Moorpark. I know that a one page paper map file will be available by the day of the 1st public hearing meeting on Tuesday, November 13, but due to the Monday holiday, I don't think it will be available earlier. Also, we are paying for an online mapping tool for which NOC is in the process of acquiring the license for Moorpark. That online mapping tool for the Moorpark map should also be available by next week and a link will then be made available on our City website. The 4 districts for Council member elections will have to contain essentially equal population numbers (which is the purpose of creating all of the population grids to facilitate the district map drawing). Small population deviations are permitted for the districts if they are necessary to achieve traditional redistricting principles which include: maintaining communities of interest, creating compact, contiguous districts; or using visible natural or manmade boundaries. The public's input is needed to identify "communities of interest" and also to understand how a community wants to be represented: Such as, do the residents of a particular community want that area to be kept together (to be a larger part of a single Council member's district); or do the residents want to be divided (in order to have the interest of more than one City Councilmember)? NDC has extensive experience with the district-based election process, and they will explain the map drawing process at our public hearing on Tuesday of next week. Following the presentation and opportunity for public comment at the public hearing on November 13, the NOC representative will be available to provide some one-on-one instruction to persons attending who have questions on how to draw a paper map as well as how to use the online mapping tool. So we will definitely have paper maps available for you to pick up at that meeting or you will be able to print the paper map template from our website or use the on line mapping tool. Hopefully, you are available to attend next Tuesday's meeting at 6:30 p.m. at the Moorpark Community Center (Apricot Room), otherwise, the 2nd public hearing on December 12 at 6:30 p.m. (same meeting location) will provide the same information and opportunity for assistance with map drawing. Deborah Traffenstedt Assistant City Manager City of Moorpark I 799 Moorpark Ave. I Moorpark, CA 93021 (805) 517-6213 I fax: (805) 532-2525 I dtraffenstedt@moorparkca.govwww.moorparkca.gov 1 103 -----Original Message----- From: Diane Walters [mailto:iskidewl@yahoo.com] Sent: Monday, November 05, 2018 4:51 PM To: Deborah Traffenstedt Subject: Maps of Moorpark Do you have maps that I can pick up this week before new districts boundary meeting? Sent from my iPhone 2 104 ATTACHMENT 3 MINUTES OF 11/13/2018 AND 12/12/2018 COMMUNITY MEETING PUBLIC HEARINGS 105 MINUTES OF THE DISTRICT-BASED ELECTION COMMUNITY MEETING Moorpark, California November 13, 2018 A District-Based Election Community Meeting of the City of Moorpark was held on November 13, 2018, in the Community Center of said City located at 799 Moorpark Avenue, Moorpark, California. 1. CALL TO ORDER: City Clerk Maureen Benson called the meeting to order at 6:37 p.m. 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Former City Manager Steven Kueny led the Pledge of Allegiance. 3. PUBLIC HEARING: A. First Public Hearing for District-Based Election Process to Invite and Receive Public Input Regarding the Composition of the Districts for the Election of City Councilmembers Prior to Drawing a Draft Map or Maps of the Proposed Boundaries of the Districts. Staff Recommendation: The City Manager will open the public hearing and direct National Demographic Corporation to provide a presentation and explanation of the districting process, public input will be encouraged and received regarding the composition of the districts, and the public hearing will be closed. (The second public hearing on the Composition of the Districts is scheduled for December 12, 2018, at 6:30 p.m.) City Manager Troy Brown opened the public hearing and introduced demographer Douglas Johnson of National Demographics. Mr. Johnson provided a PowerPoint presentation which included discussion of why the City has initiated the process to move to district-based elections, the required time frame for accomplishing this, the requirements of state and federal law, and the tools the City of Moorpark has available on its website for residents to draw their own district maps to present to the City for consideration. Four members of the community spoke during the public hearing and Mr. Johnson responded by providing additional clarification on the process for drawing districts. He also provided additional explanation regarding how increasing the number of districts in a City the size of Moorpark is an option, but not common, because this would result in a lower number of voters in each district, and that this could result in a Councilmember being elected by a small number of voters. 106 Minutes of the District-Based Election Community Meeting Moorpark, California Page 2 November 13, 2018 In response to a question about whether more than four (4) districts could be mapped, Assistant City Attorney Nicholas Ghirelli, explained that to change the number of districts requires a vote of the people, and there is not time for an election prior to the deadline for the safe harbor ordinance adoption. In response to a question regarding how often the districts would be redrawn and how incumbents would serve out their current term of office following establishment of the districts, Mr. Johnson explained the districts must be redrawn every 10 years after the census is completed. He also discussed scenarios for Councilmembers serving out their term of office and sequencing for district implementation in the 2020 and 2022 elections. Mr. Johnson also responded to questions about the priority for election year 2020 or 2022 sequencing for a new district with a high Latino voter population. In response to a question whether a population area could be divided to create two districts representing Moorpark College, Mr. Johnson confirmed that a street could be used as a boundary to divide Moorpark College into two districts; however, he also stated that it was important to remember that college students lived throughout the whole City. Mr. Brown provided a street boundary example for the Moorpark College area that wouldn't actually split the College property. Mr. Johnson discussed mapping tools that would be available on the City's website, and Mr. Chong shared information that the City's website at www.moorparkca.gov/districts contains the tools for mapping and all communications regarding the district-based election process. Mr. Brown closed the public hearing and reminded the public the next community meeting for the district-based election process will be on December 12, 2018. 4. ADJOURNMENT: The meeting adjourned at 7:34 p.m. Troy Brown, City Manager ATTEST: ~!!.~~ Maureen Benson, City Clerk 107 MINUTES OF THE DISTRICT-BASED ELECTION COMMUNITY MEETING Moorpark, California December 12, 2018 A District-Based Election Community Meeting of the City of Moorpark was held on December 12, 2018, in the Community Center of said City located at 799 Moorpark Avenue, Moorpark, California. 1 . CALL TO ORDER: City Clerk Maureen Benson called the meeting to order at 6:49 p.m. 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: City Manager Troy Brown led the Pledge of Allegiance. 3. PUBLIC HEARING: A. Second Public Hearing for District-Based Election Process to Invite and Receive Public Input Regarding the Composition of the Districts for the Election of City Councilmembers Prior to Drawing a Draft Map or Maps of the Proposed Boundaries of the Districts. Staff Recommendation: The City Manager will open the public hearing and direct National Demographic Corporation to provide a presentation and explanation of the districting process, public input will be encouraged and received regarding the composition of the districts, and the public hearing will be closed. (The first City Council public hearing on the District Maps and Sequencing is scheduled for a special meeting on January 23, 2019, at 6:30 p.m.) City Manager Troy Brown opened the public hearing. Ms. Benson introduced demographer Robert Mcintyre of National Demographics. Mr. Mcintyre stated he will be discussing communities of interest; how maps are drawn; the legal qualifications for drawing the maps; and will introduce three tools for drawing the maps. He provided a PowerPoint presentation on the California Voting Rights Act and explained why the City has initiated this process to move to district-based elections; the required time frame for accomplishing this; the requirements of state and federal law; and the tools the City of Moorpark has available on its website for residents to draw their own district maps to present to the City for consideration. 108 Minutes of the District-Based Election Community Meeting Moorpark, California Page 2 December 12, 2018 Mr. Mcintyre explained that draft maps need to be submitted before or by January 16, 2019. These maps will be reviewed at the special City Council meeting on January 23, 2019. Mr. Mcintyre demonstrated how to draw maps using the tools on the City's website and emphasized the goal of drawing maps based on communities of interest and essential population numbers for each district based on the 2010 Census. Six members of the community spoke during the public hearing, and included comments on the creation of more than four districts; having an elected Mayor versus an appointed Mayor; and avoiding gerrymandering districts to accommodate existing Councilmembers who live close to each other. Mr. Mcintyre responded by providing additional clarification on the process for drawing districts and referred to the City Attorney for response to comments on creating more than four districts. City Attorney Kevin Ennis stated that maps of five districts or more may be submitted, as no decision on the number of districts has been made. He clarified that the City Council did initiate a process to convert from the at- large Council election system to a district-based system with four districts and an elected Mayor. Mr. Mcintyre stated that the percentage of cities in Ventura County that have adopted five districts with an appointed Mayor as opposed to four districts with an elected Mayor is about 50/50. Mr. Ennis explained that Measure D adopted by the Moorpark voters in 1988 required a directly elected Mayor, which is still currently in force. He went on to state the City Council can overturn this Measure due to a California State statute enacted in 2016 and effective in January 2017 that allows the Council in the context of trying to bring their electoral process into compliance with the California Voting Rights Act to approve, without going to the voters, to have five, seven, or nine districts; or four, six or eight districts with a directly elected Mayor. Mr. Mcintyre further demonstrated the mapping tools on the City's website at www.moorparkca.gov/districts and stated tools for creating five districts will be added to the website. In response to one speaker's concerns that the community of Moorpark Highlands has been divided on the website map, Mr. Mcintyre assured that if they do not receive a map showing that area as a community of interest, they will create a map that does; and in response to another request he said they would add data online to indicate how many units have been occupied since the last census date. 109 Minutes of the District-Based Election Community Meeting Moorpark, California Page 3 December 12, 2018 Mr. Brown closed the public hearing and reminded the public of the special City Council meeting on January 23, 2019. 4. ADJOURNMENT: The meeting adjourned at 8:18 p.m. Troy Brown, City Manager ATTEST: Maureen Benson, City Clerk 110 City of Moorpark Hearing on Proposed Maps January 23, 2019 Districting Rules Equal Population Federal Voting Rights Act No Racial Gerrymandering Communities of interest Compact Contiguous Visible (Natural & man-made) boundaries Respect voters’ choices / continuity in office Planned future growth Federal Laws Traditional Redistricting Principles 2 January 23, 2019 January 23, 2019 3 Latino Population Latinos are particularly concentrated around the center of the city and along Hwy 118. Asian-Americans and African- Americans are not concentrated anywhere in the city. Election Sequencing I January 23, 2019 4 Difficult to analyze in detail with so many maps Easier once down to 2/3 maps State law requires that each draft map include a “proposed” election sequence when posted, but final sequence is up for discussion. Requirements: Match current cycle: two seats in 2020 (or three for a 5- district map) and two seats in 2022 Districting cannot impact Councilmembers’ current terms Election Sequencing II January 23, 2019 5 Standard Approach: If only one Councilmember is in one district, that district is matched to that Councilmember’s election year Same with if two Councilmembers are paired but up in the same year Next the most-heavily-Latino/traditionally lowest-turnout district is assigned to 2020, since that is a higher-turnout Presidential election year Any remaining election sequence slots are randomly assigned Proposed Maps January 23, 2019 6 20 maps received from the public: 19 before the posting deadline and 1 after the deadline One 3-district map – not population balanced Three 5-district maps Sixteen 4-district maps One received after posting deadline and not yet processed Seven not population balanced Eight population balanced 5 maps added to the mix by NDC NDC’s goal is to ensure a full range of options are available Three 4-district maps Two 5-district maps Initial Discussion January 23, 2019 7 Decide on 4 vs 5 districts Following that discussion and direction, we will move into a detailed look at the maps with the preferred number of districts Public Hearing & Discussion January 23, 2019 8 1.Which map do you think is best? 2.Which other maps are OK? Which are unacceptable? 3.What do you like or dislike about each map? 4.What changes might make your preferred map(s) even better? 5.We can use the interactive review map to examine map details Goals: 1.Narrow choices to 2 or 3 maps 2.Give direction regarding any tests or changes you wish to see made to those 2 or 3 maps Five-District Maps January 23, 2019 9 508 514 515 519 520 4-District: Not Population Balanced January 23, 2019 10 403 421 409 406 405 4-district: splits protected class neighborhood January 23, 2019 11 410 4-District: Carry Forward Maps January 23, 2019 12 418 424 416 Not population balanced 417 Not population balanced Also for next meeting: 425 (not yet processed) 4-District: Vertical Maps January 23, 2019 13 413 411 4-District: Quadrant Maps January 23, 2019 14 402 412 4-District: Central-District Maps January 23, 2019 15 401 407 422 423 422 Suggestion (if 4 districts are preferred): Consider keeping one from each group? January 23, 2019 16 Interactive review map 411 412 (Vertical) (Quadrants) (Central District) Conclusion January 23, 2019 17 Happy to look in detail at any maps Select map(s) to carry forward Next meeting will consider maps selected tonight, any map changes/tests requested by Council, and any “carry-forward” maps Interactive review map