HomeMy WebLinkAboutAGENDA REPORT 2019 0206 REG CCSA ITEM 08BCITY OF MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA
City Council Meeting
of 2.6.2019
ACTION Continued open public hearing
to adjourned meeting of 2.21.19.
Selected Maps 401a, 418a, and 422a
and not more submissions of maps from
the public.
BY M. Benson
B. Public Hearing to Receive Comments on the Transition to District -Based
Elections and Drafts of Proposed Council District Maps and Sequencing of
Elections; and if the Council completes its Map Selection Process,
Consider the Schedule for Introduction of the Ordinanc e Providing for
Election of City Council Members by District with a Directly Elected Mayor,
Establishing the Boundaries and Identification Number of Each District,
Establishing the Election Order of Each District, Amending Chapter 2.08
(“Municipal Elections”) of the Moorpark Municipal Code, and Making a
Determination of Exemption Pursuant to the California Environmental
Quality Act. Staff Recommendation: 1) Hold the fourth public hearing to
receive public comments regarding the transition of the City from at-large
elections to district-based elections for City Council Members, the content
of the draft Council district maps, and the proposed sequencing of
elections; 2) If the City Council is not prepared to select a draft map and
sequencing of district elections, then it is recommended that the Council
narrow the remaining pool of maps for future focus down to a pool of
potentially only two or three maps and a lso do the following: a. Provide
direction to staff and the public as to whether additional maps may or may
not be submitted for consideration after the February 6th public hearing; b.
Provide direction to staff concerning a preferred map(s), any changes t he
Council may wish to incorporate into the preferred map(s), or request
additional maps; c. Modify the tentative timeline for considering and
implementing the district-based election system to add a continued public
hearing date of February 21, 2019; d. Continue the public hearing and this
agenda item to an adjourned regular City Council meeting to be held
February 21st at 6:30 PM for further deliberation on district maps and
sequencing and for potential consideration of the Ordinance; and 3) If the
City Council is prepared to select a particular draft map and the
sequencing of district elections based on that map, then consider the
schedule for introduction of the ordinance attached as Attachment 11 and
introduce the ordinance for first reading at a meetin g date consistent with
the Council’s directed schedule.
Item: 8.B.
MOORPARK CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA REPORT
TO: Honorable City Council
FROM: Kevin G. Ennis, City Attorney
Nicholas R. Ghirelli, Assistant City Attorney
Doug Johnson, National Demographic Corporation
DATE: 2/6/2019 Regular Meeting
SUBJECT: Public Hearing to Receive Comments on the Transition to District-
Based Elections and Drafts of Proposed Council District Maps and
Sequencing of Elections; and if the Council completes its Map
Selection Process, Consider the Schedule for Introduction of the
Ordinance Providing for Election of City Council Members by District
with a Directly Elected Mayor, Establishing the Boundaries and
Identification Number of Each District, Establishing the Election
Order of Each District, Amending Chapter 2.08 (“Municipal
Elections”) of the Moorpark Municipal Code, and Making a
Determination of Exemption Pursuant to the California
Environmental Quality Act
SUMMARY
The City of Moorpark has undertaken a process of considering whether to transition
from a system of at-large elections to a system of district elections for electing its
Council Members. This is the fourth of five scheduled public hearings required under
the California Voting Rights Act (“CVRA”) for general law cities to convert to district-
based elections.
To date, the City has received a total of thirty-six (36) draft district maps, including six
maps prepared by the City’s professional demographer. A summary chart of each of
the maps is included herein as Attachment 1. In order to assist the City Council and the
public in reviewing all thirty-six draft maps, Attachment 2 includes maps of the City’s
current Census Blocks and their respective populations.
The City Council previously received and considered nineteen draft maps from the
public and five draft maps from the City’s professional demographer at its January 23,
2019 public hearing. At the January 23, 2019 hearing, the City Council voted to move
forward with draft maps that meet the following criteria: (1) are population balanced; (2)
provide contiguous districts; (3) do not split heavily Latino neighborhoods; (4) divide the
City into four Council districts plus an at-large, directly elected Mayor; and (5) include
boundaries for districts that touch Los Angeles Avenue and/or the Arroyo Simi to the
Item: 8.B.
12853-0027\2261170v11.doc 2
Honorable City Council
02/06/2019 Regular Meeting
Page 2
extent possible. The fourteen maps that staff believes satisfy the Council’s requested
criteria are included herein as Attachment 3.
Since the January 23, 2019 public hearing, the City has received three additional draft
maps from the public identifying proposed Council districts, but do not satisfy the
Council’s criteria because their districts are either unbalanced or non-contiguous. These
three draft maps are included herein as Attachment 4. The remaining draft maps
previously presented to the City Council on January 23rd, but that do not satisfy the
Council’s criteria, are included herein as Attachment 5.
This is the second City Council public hearing where the City Council will receive public
comments on the proposed district maps and sequencing schedule. All maps received
prior to January 30, 2019 were posted for public review at least seven days before this
hearing. As part of the public hearing process, correspondence on this matter received
prior to publication of this staff report is attached hereto as Attachment 6.
If the City Council is not prepared to select a draft map and desires the preparation of a
new map(s) or to make refinements to previously submitted maps, then the City Council
has two options: (1) continue the public hearing and adjourn the February 6th meeting
to February 21, 2019 for further deliberation on the mapping process; or (2) provide
specific direction to staff to prepare a limited number of maps for consideration and
selection of one of the maps for inclusion in a draft ordinance to be considered at the
City Council’s regular meeting of March 6th.
If at the conclusion of this public hearing the City Council is prepared to select and
proceed with a draft map, which has previously been published for at least seven (7)
days, then the Council may establish a schedule for the introduction of the ordinance for
first reading. In order to do so, the City Council must first direct staff to insert the
selected map and sequencing of district elections into the draft ordinance.
This staff report is also intended to address several issues discussed by the City
Council at the January 23, 2019 hearing, including (1) map drawing standards and
considerations, including street splitting; (2) sequencing; and (3) future growth. In
addition, this staff report explains the legal principles underlying “gerrymandering,”
which has not yet been discussed by the Council, but is an important and often
misunderstood concept in the map drawing process.
BACKGROUND
As the Council is aware, the City of Moorpark currently elects its City Council Members
through an “at-large” election system in which each Council Member can reside
anywhere in the City and is elected by the voters of the entire City to provide citywide
representation. This methodology for electing Council Members has been in place
since City incorporation in 1983. The Office of Mayor is a separate, directly elected
office with a term of office of two years, as established by voter approval of Measure D
at an election on November 8, 1988.
12853-0027\2261170v11.doc 3
Honorable City Council
02/06/2019 Regular Meeting
Page 3
On August 29, 2018, the City received a letter from Kevin Shenkman, an attorney of the
law firm of Shenkman & Hughes, challenging the City's current election method and
asserting that the City’s at-large election system violates the CVRA. (Elections Code
Sections 14025 through 14032). Mr. Shenkman’s letter threatens litigation if the City
declines to voluntarily convert to district-based elections for Council Members. The City
has entered into a tolling agreement with Mr. Shenkman that precludes him from filing a
lawsuit under the CVRA until April 9, 2019.
On October 11, 2018, the City Council adopted a Resolution of Intent to transition from
at-large to district-based elections for the election of Council Members. Adoption of the
Resolution of Intent did not commit the City to any one course of action, but instead set
forth a timeline and process by which the City would conduct public hearings on the
proposal and prepare and review draft Council district maps.
On November 13 and December 12, 2018, the City held the first two public hearings to
receive comments regarding the transition of the City from at-large elections to district-
based elections for Council Members and the composition of the City Council districts.
City staff and the City’s contracted demographer answered questions regarding district-
based elections and heard from residents regarding their preferences and concerns
about potential district maps. Residents were invited to prepare their own district maps
for consideration by the City Council.
On January 23, 2019, the City Council held the first public hearing to receive comments
on draft district maps and sequencing. After the public hearing, the City Council voted
to move forward with draft district maps that divide the City into four Council districts
plus an at-large, directly elected Mayor.
Minutes from the first two public hearings are included as Attachment 7. The minutes of
the January 23, 2019 have not been completed at this time.
DRAFT MAPS
As part of the process of transitioning to district-based elections, the City Attorney’s
Office retained National Demographics Corporation (NDC) to analyze the City’s
demographic and voting data and to draft proposed district maps for the election of
Council Members by district.
The City Council previously considered twenty-four (24) maps at its meeting of January
23rd, including five maps prepared by NDC and 19 maps submitted by the public.
Applying districting principles under the CVRA, NDC has determined that some of these
maps do not satisfy the requirements of law. These included: (1) five maps that were
not population balanced (403, 405, 406, 409, and 421); and (2) one map that split a
heavily Latino neighborhood in potential violation of the Federal Voting Rights Act (410).
In addition three maps carried over or received after the January 23rd meeting are not
population balanced (416 and 417) or contain non-contiguous districts (427). for these
12853-0027\2261170v11.doc 4
Honorable City Council
02/06/2019 Regular Meeting
Page 4
reasons, NDC understands that these maps would not likely be carried over for further
consideration by the City Council.
In addition, the City Council’s decision to retain an at-large elected Mayor with four
Council districts meant that the City Council would not further consider five-district maps
(508, 514, 515, 519, 520, 526) or three-district maps (304).
Fourteen maps have been prepared and published for further City Council consideration
at the February 6th public hearing (401a, 402a, 406a, 407a, 411, 412a, 413, 418, 418a,
421a, 422a, 423a, 424, 425). Some of these maps are revised versions of maps
previously presented to the City Council on January 23rd. These include all of the maps
with an “a” in their names. For example, 406a is the population-balanced version of the
map 406. Some of the other “a” maps were altered based on councilmember
comments to move zero population areas into particular districts if such changes would
facilitate having the district touch Los Angeles Avenue or the Arroyo Simi. Maps 421a,
422a and 423a are revised versions submitted by residents Janet Murphy & Dawn
Morata and map 407a is a version of a map provided by resident Bruce Hamous. Maps,
however, were not modified to detach the area on Charles Street from the Moorpark
Highlands area because it would cause a split in a Census Block. As noted above,
these fourteen maps are included as Attachment 3 and staff understands these maps
will be the focus of discussion at the February 6th public hearing.
Each draft map also identifies the potential sequence of elections for that map, if the
City Council Members will be elected at different times to provide for staggered terms of
office. A more detailed discussion of sequencing is included below in this staff report.
All draft maps of the proposed boundaries of the districts received from NDC and the
public are currently published on the City’s website and include the population and
proposed election sequencing information, and these files and all of the public hearing
agenda records are also available in the Office of the City Clerk, and can be emailed or
printed upon request.
If the City Council desires to solicit additional maps from the public for consideration at
an adjourned meeting of February 21st, then those additional draft maps from the public
must be submitted to the City by February 11th. This will provide NDC sufficient time to
prepare the map for publication at least seven days before the February 21st public
hearing.
DISTRICTING PROCESS
Effective January 1, 2017, Elections Code Section 10010 established a new process for
switching to district-based elections. The process includes a series of public hearings at
which the public is invited to provide input regarding the composition of the districts.
The purpose of the first two public hearings is to receive comments regarding the
transition of the City from at-large elections for Council Members to district-based
12853-0027\2261170v11.doc 5
Honorable City Council
02/06/2019 Regular Meeting
Page 5
elections for Council Members, the time frame for this transition, and the criteria and
factors that go into the drawing of maps of single-member voting districts.
The proposed schedule for the transition from at-large elections to district-based
elections for City Council requires five public hearings between November 13, 2018 and
the proposed date of March 6, 2019 for the adoption of the ordinance establishing
district-based elections (scheduled items in italics are proposed to be completed at this
hearing):
• October 11, 2018 Adoption of proposed resolution stating the City’s
intent to transition to district-based elections
• November 13, 2018 Public Hearing No. 1
• December 12, 2018 Public Hearing No. 2
• January 16, 2019 First draft maps of proposed Council districts and
sequencing available
• January 23, 2019 Public Hearing No. 3
• February 6, 2019 Public Hearing No. 4
• February 21, 2019 Continued Public Hearing No. 4 (if necessary) and
potential date to introduce ordinance to elect Council
Members by District
• March 6, 2019 Public Hearing No. 5. If not introduced on February
6th or February 21st, introduce ordinance to elect
Council Members by districts, or second reading and
approval if introduced on February 6 or February 21st
• March 20, 2019 Potential Public Hearing No. 6. Ordinance approval
(ordinance effective 30 days after second reading and
adoption)
DISTRICTING CRITERIA
Robert McEntire and Doug Johnson of NDC have prepared a detailed explanation of the
criteria used to prepare districting maps under federal and state law, which has been
reviewed and revised by our Office and is set forth below:
The CVRA requires district boundaries follow two rules: (1) nearly equal population in
each district; and (2) compliance with the requirements of the Federal Voting Rights Act.
(Elections Code Section 21601).
The Federal Voting Rights Act prohibits the following: (1) the division of any
neighborhood or community that is made up of significant numbers of “protected class”
voters (primarily Latinos in Moorpark) if that division would dilute the voting strength of
those protected class voters; and (2) racial gerrymandering, meaning race cannot be
the “predominate” factor in how the lines are drawn. In achieving these requirements,
the CVRA allows the City to consider the following factors: (1) topography, (2)
12853-0027\2261170v11.doc 6
Honorable City Council
02/06/2019 Regular Meeting
Page 6
geography, (3) cohesiveness, contiguity, integrity, and compactness of territory, and (4)
community of interests of the council districts.
The equal population requirement is based on 2010 Census counts of the total
population in each district. It counts total people—not registered voters, eligible voters,
or any other number. The requirement is to be as close to 0% overall plan deviation as
possible, though up to a 10% plan deviation is considered “presumptively
constitutional.” (McCoy v. Chicago Heights Election Comm’n, 880 F.3d 411, 415 (7th
Cir. 2018) (“Though it does not require exact mathematical precision, the Constitution
does require a government to ‘make an honest and good-faith effort to construct its
districts as nearly of equal population as is practicable.’ [Citation Omitted] A maximum
population deviation between voting districts of less than ten percent is presumptively
constitutional.” [Citation Omitted]).) The plan deviation is calculated by first calculating
the percentage that each district is above or below the target population per district, and
then calculating the difference between the largest and smallest districts. So, if the
largest district by population is 3% over the target, and if the smallest district by
population is 2% under the target, then the plan deviation is 5% (the difference between
+3% and -2%).
In addition to the Federal requirements, there are also “traditional redistricting criteria,”
which are traditional “good government” goals, rather than requirements.
Often-cited “traditional redistricting criteria” include compact, contiguous maps that
follow major roads or other visible geographic features. These criteria all relate to the
idea that a district’s borders should be relatively easy for residents to figure out if they
want to run for office or to knock on doors in support of a candidate. Perhaps the most
commonly cited criteria is “community of interest,” which is not specifically defined but in
general means a geographic grouping of people who have a shared concern or interest
in the jurisdiction’s issues and decisions. One type of community of interest includes a
homeowners association for a particular development. A map identifying the various
homeowners associations in the City is attached as Attachment 10. Note that
respecting communities of interest often means trying to unite a given community in a
certain district, but it could also mean dividing the community to ensure that more than
one Council Member is accountable to that community, provided that other mandatory
districting criteria are met.
Planned future growth is also a “traditional redistricting criteria,” but since the districts
drawn in 2019 will only be used in 2020 (and then will be redrawn in 2021 to take into
consideration the new 2020 Census data), the City Council may decide not to place as
much weight on planned future growth during this redistricting cycle.
The final consideration is sometimes referred to as “continuity in office” and/or
“respecting the will of the voters” in a manner that avoids placing multiple current
Council Members into a single district.
12853-0027\2261170v11.doc 7
Honorable City Council
02/06/2019 Regular Meeting
Page 7
The adopted map is required to comply with the CVRA and the three Federal
requirements, while the goal is to adopt the map that the Council decides best balances
the various “traditional redistricting criteria.”
CENSUS BLOCKS, POPULATION NUMBERS, AND BLOCK SPLITS
Doug Johnson of NDC prepared a detailed explanation regarding the use of Census
Blocks, population numbers, and block splits in the districting process. His explanation
has been reviewed and revised by our Office and is set forth below:
As noted above, 2010 Census data is used to ensure compliance with the Federal
requirement for equal population in the districts. In a small jurisdiction like Moorpark,
the presumptively constitutional difference between the largest and smallest districts
can be no more than 860 people. The data used to calculate the population of each
district comes from the Census Bureau in small geographic units called Census Blocks.
Maps of the City’s current Census Blocks and their respective populations are included
herein as Attachment 2. The third page of that Attachment is a map that generally
shows which Census Block each Councilmember is currently residing within. Although
the use of Census Blocks in drawing district boundaries is not strictly required by the
CVRA or Federal Voting Rights Act, their use is a matter of practical reality because it is
the most reliable manner of calculating each district’s population. Accordingly, it is not
necessarily illegal to split Census Blocks, but there are some limitations to splitting
Census Blocks in the redistricting process that are explained further below.
If a district boundary divides a Census Block in a way that has significant numbers of
residences on either side of the division, the demographer would have to speculate at
the number of occupied residences on either side at the time of the April 1, 2010
Census, and speculate at how many people were in each of those occupied residences.
If the block involves only 5 or 10 people then there is little threat that an estimation error
would impact whether the overall plan is within the 10 percent maximum deviation
allowed. But as the population of the Census Block grows (some Census Blocks have
500, one thousand, or more residents), the risk grows that the estimates are wrong and
that the plan might actually not meet the equal population requirement. If that were the
case, a resident, for whatever reason, could bring a successful lawsuit challenging the
map on the grounds that the districts are not population balanced. The City would not
have the benefit of using Census Blocks to justify the district populations.
Where streets follow a grid pattern, each street border is typically a Census Block
border. But where there are cul-de-sacs and/or hills, the Bureau struggles to find lines
that it can use as Census Block borders, so often two groupings of houses separated by
large hills end up in the same Census Block even though the two groupings of houses
are in distinctly different neighborhoods. This happens frequently in the northern portion
of Moorpark, and in some parts of the southern areas.
12853-0027\2261170v11.doc 8
Honorable City Council
02/06/2019 Regular Meeting
Page 8
FUTURE GROWTH IN THE CITY
As noted above, population balance is based on the most current census data—the
2010 Census in this case. To that end, the draft maps prepared by NDC are based on
the 2010 Census. The 2010 Census does not reflect more recent residential
developments that were built after the 2010 Census was conducted or entitled projects
that have not yet been built. As discussed above, however, “planned future growth” is
one consideration that the City Council may use in the current districting process. Due
to the forthcoming census in 2020, practical reasons may militate against utilizing recent
growth as a consideration in the district process. However, information regarding recent
and projected future growth is provided below in case the City Council desires to
consider these figures in its decision-making process.
Per the City Council’s direction, a chart attached as Attachment 8 explains the location
of units built since 2010, entitled projects since 2010, and projects in the review process
(projects “in the pipeline”) since 2010. Based on this data, the following development
has occurred since the 2010 Census was conducted: (1) 731 dwelling units built (plus
several recent accessory dwelling units); (2) 710 approved and unbuilt units; and (3)
1503 unentitled units in the pipeline. These units range from apartment to single family
residences.
In addition, a planning area map identifying the location of the 731 units built since the
2010 Census is attached hereto as Attachment 9. Should the City Council decide to
incorporate these 731 units into the current districting process, population estimates for
each new housing unity would need to be calculated and used to revise the 2010
Census data. One factor that the City may consider is the type of housing and typical
size of housing approved in certain areas of the City. Once a particular area is
identified, staff could attempt to calculate the size of homes in that area and the
anticipated average population within those homes, realizing that such estimates,
depending on how many homes are involved, may not be sufficiently reliable for this
purpose.
It is possible, but not certain, that the 2020 Census will have more useful Census Blocks
that provide Census Block boundaries that better reflect community borders in the City.
The City Council may consider directing staff to encourage the Census Bureau to adopt
different Census Blocks that better reflect the City’s communities of interest.
ELECTION SEQUENCING
Robert McEntire and Doug Johnson prepared a detailed explanation regarding election
sequencing, which has been reviewed and revised by our Office and is set forth below:
Districting involves two tasks: drawing a map of election districts, and deciding which
districts would hold elections in which years. The latter task is referred to as
“sequencing.”
12853-0027\2261170v11.doc 9
Honorable City Council
02/06/2019 Regular Meeting
Page 9
The CVRA contains the following provision on sequencing:
“In determining the final sequence of the district elections conducted in a
political subdivision in which members of the governing body will be
elected at different times to provide for staggered terms of office, the
governing body shall give special consideration to the purposes of the
California Voting Rights Act of 2001, and it shall take into account the
preferences expressed by members of the districts.” (Elections Code
Section 10010(b)).
The primary purpose of the CVRA is to eliminate racially polarized voting.
There are two absolute requirements for election sequencing:
1. If the City Council intends to maintain sequencing, it has to match the current
seats-to-years counts: since the Council currently has 2 Council Members up in
2020, and currently has two Council Members up in 2022, there must be two
districts up for election in 2020 and two districts up for election in 2022; and
2. It will not impact current Council Members’ remaining terms. This means that all
Councilmembers remain “at-large” Council Members for the duration of their
current terms. No Council Members are “assigned” to any district at the time the
map is adopted – Council Members only represent a given district after they are
elected in a by-district election in that district.
Given these two tasks, the City will need to establish an election sequence schedule to
ensure that the four council seats are filled after the November 2020 election and that
elections continue to be staggered. Staggering council seats is not legally required, but
the vast majority of cities do it in order to preserve institutional knowledge and smooth
governance. Like most California cities, Moorpark’s current practice is to stagger
elections. State law permits the City Council to specify transitional sequencing in order
to implement the new districts. (Government Code Section 34878).
The current terms of office of the four existing Moorpark Council Members are: (1)
Councilmembers Mikos and Simons (terms ends in 2020); and (2) Councilmembers
Enegren and Pollock (terms end 2022).
Once district maps are adopted, the Council must determine which of the newly drawn
districts will be first for district representation. The Council can assign any two districts
to 2020 that the Council wishes to select for that election year (with the remaining
districts then automatically assigned to 2022). Among other options, the public may
wish to discuss and the Council may wish to consider the following hierarchy for district
sequencing:
12853-0027\2261170v11.doc 10
Honorable City Council
02/06/2019 Regular Meeting
Page 10
1. If a single Council Member is in a district, that district is assigned to match the
Council Member’s election term, as this allows the voters in that district to decide
whether their current Council Member, should he or she run for re-election,
deserves re-election;
2. If two Council Members whose terms end in the same year are in a single district,
that district is assigned to match the two Council Members’ terms;
3. If that does not assign all the districts (meaning there is at least one pair of
Council Members with differing election years), then the most-heavily-
Latino/traditionally lowest-turnout district is assigned to 2020, since that is a
higher-turnout Presidential election year and that sequencing choice will
generate more total voters voting in Council elections (this also goes along with
the statutory language about considering “the goals of CVRA” when making
sequencing decisions);
4. Any remaining election sequence slots are randomly assigned to the remaining
open and/or paired-Council-Members-on-different-terms seats.
The most common change to the above hierarchy is if one Council Member already
knows that he or she is not going to run again at the end of his or her term – then the
City can ignore his or her location and term for this analysis.
If a district is up in 2020 and the term of one resident Council Member ends in 2020
while the term of another Council Member resident in that district ends in 2022, then the
2020 Councilmember can run for re-election to that district seat in 2020 at the normal
end of his term. But it may not be that simple, as the 2022 Council Member faces a
dilemma: he/she can run, mid-term, in 2020 against the 2020 Council Member. If the
2022 Council Member wins, he/she resigns the 2022 at-large seat and is sworn into the
2020 by-district seat, leaving a two-year vacancy in the at-large seat. The Council
would then fill that two-year, at-large vacancy by appointment or special election. The
Council could even appoint the 2020 Council Member who just lost the head-to-head
contest to fill the two-year term. If the 2022 Council Member loses, he/she remains on
the Council for the remaining two years of his/her current four-year at-large term, and
then leaves the Council in 2022.
12853-0027\2261170v11.doc 11
Honorable City Council
02/06/2019 Regular Meeting
Page 11
The following table summarizes the impact on Council Members of the sequencing
decisions:
Representative Resides in 2020
District
Representative
Resides in 2022
District
Representative’s
Term Ends in
2020
Representative can run for re-
election in the district at end of
current term.
Representative leaves
office at the end of term.
Representative can run
for the office two years
later, though not as an
incumbent.
Representative’s
Term Ends in
2022
(Option 1) Representative leaves
office at end of term, and could run
again two years later, though not
as an incumbent.
(Option 2) Representative runs for
by-district seat in 2020. If elected,
resigns at-large seat (leaving a 2-
year, at large vacancy) and is
sworn into by-district seat. If
unsuccessful, remains in office
until 2022 end of current at-large
term.
Representative can run
for re-election in the
current district at the end
of current term.
Traditionally under-represented areas generally want to hold the by-district election in
their new district as soon as possible. When the next election is a Presidential election
(as was the case when Elections Code Section 10010(b) was written), this sets up an
easy goal, as the low-turnout area would have an election as soon as possible and an
election in a high-turnout Presidential election year. When the next election is a
Gubernatorial election, holding an election in the lowest-turnout area as soon as
possible conflicts with the goal of enhancing the ability of that historically low-turnout
area to elect their preferred candidate. The “next election” is a one-time event, but
assigning an area to a Gubernatorial or a Presidential election is essentially a
permanent decision: once someone is elected from that area, future post-census
redistrictings generally keep the district on the same election cycle as the local
representative.
While it has been done, staff recommends against a purely random assignment of
election years, because such an approach ignores the potential representation benefits
of an assigned election year for historically under-represented areas and has the
12853-0027\2261170v11.doc 12
Honorable City Council
02/06/2019 Regular Meeting
Page 12
possibility of forcing a representative, who has been chosen by the voters, from office
based on a purely random act. When Modesto, for example, randomly assigned
election years, the random drawing of numbers blocked from re-election two Council
Members whom the map had located alone in different districts.
DEFINITION OF “GERRYMANDERING” AND ITS ROLE IN THE DISTRICTING
PROCESS
Robert McEntire and Doug Johnson of NDC prepared a detailed explanation regarding
gerrymandering. His explanation has been reviewed and revised by our Office and is
set forth below:
“Racial gerrymandering” is a legally defined term. It falls under the Federal Voting
Rights Act and has been extensively litigated. (Gil v. Whitford, 138 S. Ct. 1916 (2018)
(“[R]acial gerrymander—a drawing of district lines on the basis of race….”).)
“Partisan gerrymandering” is currently a hotly debated topic in the courts and in society,
though the term is not yet defined under California or Federal law. It boils down to
legislators intentionally drawing district lines to include voters who support the legislator
and to exclude voters who oppose the legislator, or otherwise drawing the lines to
benefit the legislator’s political party. (Gil v. Whitford, 138 S. Ct. 1916 (2018) (“Partisan
gerrymandering” might include “dividing a party's supporters among multiple districts so
that they fall short of a majority in each one” or “concentrating one party's backers in a
few districts that they win by overwhelming margins.”).)
Neither of those two issues are in question here in Moorpark, as all the maps currently
under consideration avoid racial gerrymandering; the Moorpark City Council is a non-
partisan body so drawing lines to benefit one’s own political party is not an issue; and
none of the maps have been drawn to include or exclude voters based on the perceived
voting history of those voters.
The term “gerrymandering” often comes up in the context of a map that separates some
or all current officeholders into separate districts, but that is an inaccurate use of the
term. Separating current officeholders simply respects the will of the voters and is done
to empower the voters: if current officeholders are in separate districts, then each can
run for re-election and the voters get to decide which officeholders have earned re-
election. If the lines put two (or more) officeholders together in one district, then at least
one of those officeholders cannot be re-elected.
FISCAL IMPACT
The City through its City Attorney retained NDC to analyze the demographic data and
voting data of the City and draft proposed district maps for the election of Council
Members by district. If a claim for the attorney fees is made by Mr. Shenkman, the
maximum potential liability to the City under Elections Code Section 10010 is $30,000 if
the City ultimately transitions to district-based elections within the agreed upon timeline.
12853-0027\2261170v11.doc 13
Honorable City Council
02/06/2019 Regular Meeting
Page 13
The legal and contract services costs including the anticipated $30,000 payment were
budgeted by the City Council at its meeting of November 7, 2018, through the adoption
of a budget amendment resolution. Staff costs to administer the process are in addition
to the previously approved budget amendment.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council:
1. Hold the fourth public hearing to receive public comments regarding the transition
of the City from at-large elections to district-based elections for City Council
Members, the content of the draft Council district maps, and the proposed
sequencing of elections; and
2. If the City Council is not prepared to select a draft map and sequencing of district
elections, then it is recommended that the Council narrow the remaining pool of
maps for future focus down to a pool of potentially only two or three maps and
also do the following:
a. Provide direction to staff and the public as to whether additional maps may
or may not be submitted for consideration after the February 6th public
hearing.
b. Provide direction to staff concerning a preferred map(s), any changes the
Council may wish to incorporate into the preferred map(s), or request
additional maps.
c. Modify the tentative timeline for considering and implementing the district-
based election system to add a continued public hearing date of February
21, 2019.
d. Continue the public hearing and this agenda item to an adjourned regular
City Council meeting to be held February 21st at 6:30 PM for further
deliberation on district maps and sequencing and for potential
consideration of the Ordinance.
3. If the City Council is prepared to select a particular draft map and the sequencing
of district elections based on that map, then consider the schedule for
introduction of the ordinance attached as Attachment 11 and introduce the
ordinance for first reading at a meeting date consistent with the Council’s
directed schedule.
12853-0027\2261170v11.doc 14
Honorable City Council
02/06/2019 Regular Meeting
Page 14
ATTACHMENTS
1. Summary Chart of All Draft Maps
2. Maps showing Census Block Numbers, Population, and Location of
Councilmember Residences
3. Focused Draft Maps (including Demographic and Voting Information for Draft
Maps and Summary Tables) as of January 23, 2019
4. New Draft Maps (including Demographic and Voting Information for Draft Maps
and Summary Tables) Received Since January 23, 2019 But Not Carried Over
for Focused Review
5. Previous Draft Maps (including Demographic and Voting Information for Draft
Maps and Summary Tables) from January 23, 2019 Not Carried Over for
Focused Review
6. Correspondence received in addition to Draft Maps
7. Minutes of 11/13/2018 and 12/12/2018 Public Hearings
8. Chart of Estimated Additional Units since the 2010 Census
9. Planning Map of Units Built Since 2010 Census
10. Map depicting general location of existing HOAs
11. Draft Ordinance to Adopt District-Based Elections
12853-0027\2261170v11.doc 15
Attachment 1
Summary Chart of All Draft Maps
12853-0027\2261170v11.doc 16
Plan Name Submitter # Districts Pop. Dev. Most-Latino PairsAll Touch LA Group401amultiple4 5.59% 49.6% 2 in D1; 2 in D2 YesCentral402a Stephanie Anderson 4 3.38% 46% 2 in D1; 2 in D2 Yes Quadrant406a Mark Van Dam4 7.46% 45% 2 in D1; 2 in D2 Yes Quadrant407a Bruce Hamous4 5.66% 48% 2 in D1YesCentral411NDC4 6.71% 46% NoneNo Vertical412aNDC4 6.38% 47% 2 in D1; 2 in D2 Yes Quadrant413NDC4 4.11% 45% 2 in D1Yes Vertical418 Mark Van Dam4 4.69% 49.6% 2 in D1; 2 in D2 YesCentral418a Mark Van Dam4 4.52% 49.6% 2 in D1; 2 in D2 YesCentral421aJanet Murphy & Dawn Mortara4 9.96% 45% 2 in D1No Vertical422aJanet Murphy & Dawn Mortara4 9.89% 51% 3 in D1YesCentral423aJanet Murphy & Dawn Mortara4 1.38% 47% 2 in D1YesCentral424Steve Kueny4 3.21% 46% 2 in D1; 2 in D2Quadrant425Steve Kueny4 9.73% 40% 3 in D3Yes Quadrant416 Kristine Reynolds 4 107.73% n/a 2 in D1; 2 in D2Not Balanced417 Jeff Reynolds 4 51.19% n/a 2 in D1; 2 in D2 Not Balanced426Alex Yee4 1.34% 23% 2 in D1; 2 in D2Not Contiguous401multiple4 5.42% 49.7% 2 in D1; 2 in D2Central402 Stephanie Anderson 4 3.38% 46% 2 in D1; 2 in D2Quadrant407Bruce Hamous4 2.42% 49.5% 4 in D1Central412NDC4 6.38% 47% 2 in D1; 2 in D2Quadrant422Janet Murphy & Dawn Mortara4 4.61% 53% 3 in D1Central423Janet Murphy & Dawn Mortara4 6.66% 48% 2 in D1Central304T. Duck3 106.87% n/an/aNot Balanced403Janine Atkins4 19.01% n/a 2 in D3Not Balanced405Ute Van Dam4 78.16% n/a 2 in D1; 2 in D2Not Balanced406 Mark Van Dam4 16.93% n/a 2 in D1; 2 in D2Not Balanced409 Stephanie Anderson 4 15.77% n/a 4 in D1Not Balanced410 Stephanie Anderson 4 8.77% 33% 2 in D1; 2 in D2Splits Latinos421Janet Murphy & Dawn Mortara4 10.51% n/a 2 in D1; 2 in D2Not Balanced508 David Delgadillo5 4.94% 49% 3 in D1; 2 in D2Five514NDC5 3.08% 55% 2 in D1Five515NDC5 8.51% 51% 3 in D1; 2 in D2Five519Janet Murphy & Dawn Mortara5 3.72% 57% 3 in D1; 2 in D2Five520Janet Murphy & Dawn Mortara5 8.11% 51% 3 in D1; 2 in D2Five526 *Clint Harper5 8.92% 49% 2 in D1; 2 in D2New* received after Council decision to focus on 4-district maps.ATTACHMENT 117
Attachment 2
Maps showing Census Block Numbers, Population,
and Location of Councilmember Residences
12853-0027\2261170v11.doc 18
434841942311411710393712293613282352244182445472132403345304272317381686461533202526191Oak ParkMoorparkCommunityColgVilla delArroyoMobile Hm PkCollege ViewParkCampus ParkVirginiaColony ParkMoorpark PlzMoorparkVillage CtrPeach HillParkCommunityPlaygroundMoorparkTown CtrChaparral JrHSVlg Retail &Auto ShopsArroyo VistaCommunityParkTerra RejadaParkGlenwoodParkCountryTrail ParkGabbert Canyon ChnnlGabbert Canyon Debris BasinN 2 Canyon Fire RdCampus RdE Los Angeles AveGraduate CirSwift PlUniversity DrBorges DrBraun CtSeitz CtBeragan StDelfen S t
Bittner PlCollins DrPecan AveBenwood DrCampus Park DrReedley StVarsity StLuther CirMarquette CirQueens CtN C r e ig ht o n S t
N Amherst StN A u b u r n Ci r
N W e s tw o o d St
College Heights DrPrinceton AveNew Los Angeles AveH ig h P tRidgecrest DrSperryville LnBlack Rock CirFishers CtSpring RdSarazen DrChampionship DrBreezy Glen DrWaterworks RdValley RdH ed yl a n d C tFitch AveScience DrSouthfork RdFlinn AveWicks RdCharles StE High StBard St
Everett St1st St2nd StEsther AveSherman AveMillard StMoorpark AveTierra Rejada RdC rabapple C tB rennan R dM oorpark RdCoffeetree LnP e rsi m m o n S tStagecoach TrlDak ota Dr
H o pi C t
S p ri n g R d
Grand Isle DrVista Del Valle DrN Cedarpine Ln
Ashbrook LnE Vistapark DrE Annette StTrailcrest DrSunnyslope PlWilliams Ranch RdWestport StZaharias CtLittler Ct
Snead Dr Casey RdPoindexter AveLa Palma CtDarlene LnE nde a v o ur C t
Whitney Ave
Kazuko Ct
Beltramo Ranch Rd
Haynie CtAspen Hills DrGrimes Canyon RdJacobson PlHogan StGabbert Rd
Trevino DrElwin LnN Commerce Ave
Courtney LnHollyglen CtWillowood CtT urfw ay R dHillside DrForestglen CtSilver Creek StWinter AveBeech Grove CtWillow Hill DrAlderbrook StHavencrest StCountrywood DrDaisy Ct
Gentlewood DrN a p o l i P l
R e v e l lo P l
Wi n t er Wo o d C t
Broadview DrHavenridge Ct23118118118Seabiscuit PlCll PimaCity of Moorpark 2018 DistrictingUse this map with theMicrosoft Excel kitsupplement.An online version of this map thatallows you to zoom in and out formore detail is available as a linkfrom the City website.Population Unit ID NumbersNational Demographics Corporation, November 13, 2018Map layersCensus BlockLandmark AreaPipeline/Power LineRailroadRiverStreetsWater AreaPopUnitsATTACHMENT 219
421
436
475
369
510
0
1579
446
503
118
1028
1613
704
0
414
82
1389
550
1201
1656
830
1233
0
1172
1168
0
1174
491
1348
162
477
9
1196
428
1397
320
45
931
732
1535
310
15
946
1761
1357
City of Moorpark 2018 Districting
An online version of this map that allows you to zoom in and out for
more detail is available as a link from the City website.
Public Participation Kit Map
National Demographics Corporation, December 20, 2018
Each number indicates the total population of that "population
unit" area. Each district must have essentially equal population:
for a four-district map close to 8,605, with no more than a 860-
person difference between the largest and smallest; for a
five-district map close to 6,884, with no more than a 688-person
difference.
Name:
____________________________
Email:
____________________________
Phone:
____________________________
Map layers
Census Block
Landmark Area
Pipeline/Power Line
Railroad
River
Streets
Water Area
PopUnits
20
Pollock2022Mikos2020Enegren2022Simons2020Oak ParkVilla delArroyoMobile Hm PkMoorparkCommunityColgCollege ViewParkCampus ParkVirginiaColony ParkMoorpark PlzOld TownBusinessDistrictMoorparkVillage CtrMonte VistaNature ParkPeach HillParkMoorparkTown CtrChaparral JrHSVlg Retail &Auto ShopsArroyo VistaCommunityParkMountainMeadows CityParkGlenwoodParkCountryTrail ParkGabbert Canyon ChnnlN 2 Canyon Fire RdCampus RdGraduate CirSwift PlUniversity DrBorges DrBraun CtSeitz CtMoorpark CollE Los Angeles AveCampus Park DrMahan CtSosna CtC o l l i n s D r
Pecan AveMarquette St
Varsity StLuther CirReedley StMarquette CirStanford StQueens CtN C r e i g h t o n S t
N Amherst StN A u b u r n C i r
N Westwood StClemson StNogales AveWhite Sage DrH ig h P tE lk R un LoopE l k s R u n W a y Elkton CtSpring RdSarazen DrChampionship DrShadow Wood PlValley RdWaterworks RdPrinceton AveCharles StFitch AveScience DrSouthfork RdMiller PkwyFlinn AveWicks RdEverett StFlory Ave2nd StSusan AveRoberts AveEsther AveSherman AveNorfolk CtMillard StMajestic CtTierra Rejada RdC rabapple C tScholartree C tB rennan R dMoorpark RdC o ffeetree L n
P e rs im m o n S tOlive StDak ota Dr
M aya Ci rH o p i C t
Peach Hill RdBear Valley RdVista Del Valle DrMcbeth CtDonnybrook LnAshbrook LnBella Vista Dr
N Millerton RdN Vistapark DrN Ashtree StBlairwood DrSunnyslope PlChristian Barrett DrSleepy Wind StZaharias Ct
L i tt l e r Ct
Snead Dr Casey RdPoindexter AveLa Palma CtVilla Campesina AveDarlene LnE n d e a v o u r C t
Whitney Ave
Kazuko Ct
Maureen LnBeltramo Ranch Rd
Aspen Hills DrGrimes Canyon RdGabbert Rd Elwin LnN Commerce Ave
T ier r a R e ja d a R d
Avedon RdN Buttercreek Rd
T urfw ay R dN Terracemeadow CtN Sunsetmeadow CtCliffrose AveOak Glen
M istygrove StArbor Hill StMountain Trail StAlderbrook StHavencrest StHoneybrook CtTorino StEmilio CtCountrywood DrBrookwood DrQuailcreek CtMeadow St
Heather Glen Ct
Gentlewood DrT im b e r V ie w C tBroadview DrHavenridge Ct23118118118Seabiscuit PlAffirmed PlCity of Moorpark 2018 DistrictingNational Demographics Corporation, February 1, 2019Census Blocks whereCouncilmembers resideMap layersCensus BlockLandmark AreaPipeline/Power LineRailroadRiverStreetsWater AreaCouncil Blocks21
Attachment 3
Focused Draft Maps (including Demographic and Voting Information for Draft
Maps and Summary Tables) as of January 23, 2019
12853-0027\2261170v11.doc 22
4312Oak ParkVilla delArroyoMobile Hm PkMoorparkCommunityColgCollege ViewParkVirginiaColony ParkMoorpark PlzOld TownBusinessDistrictMoorparkVillage CtrMonte VistaNature ParkPeach HillParkChaparral JrHSVlg Retail &Auto ShopsArroyo VistaCommunityParkMountainMeadows CityParkGlenwoodParkCountryTrail ParkGabbert Canyon ChnnlN 2 Canyon Fire RdCampus RdGraduate CirSwift PlBraun CtDoris CtBe ragan S t E Los Angeles AveD e l f en S t
Thionnet PlCollins DrPecan AveBenwood DrCampus Park DrReedley StVarsity StLuther CirMarquette CirN Vassar CirQueens CtCornell CirPrinceton Ave
L afayette St
N A u b u r n C i r
N Westwood StCollege H eights DrNogales AveWhite Sage DrH ig h P tE lk R un LoopE l k s R u n W a y Elkton CtBlack Rock CirShenandoah WayFishers CtSpring RdSarazen DrChampionship DrBreezy Glen DrWaterworks RdValley RdH e d y la nd C tFitch AveScience DrSouthfork RdFlinn AveWicks RdBonnie View RdWalnut St2nd StSusan AveRoberts AveEsther AveSherman AveFlory AveWestcott CtMajestic CtTierra Rejada RdC rabapple C tShawnee StBrennan R dC offeetree L n
P e rs imm o n S tM iller P k wy Dakota Dr
M a y a C irStagecoach TrlPeach Hill RdVista Del Valle DrRolling Knoll Ln
Donnybrook LnAshbrook LnBella Vista Dr
N Millerton RdN Vistapark DrC l a v e l e A v e Blairwood DrSunnyslope PlSleepy Wind StZaharias CtL it tle r Ct
Snead DrCasey RdPoindexter AveGisler RdDarlene LnE n d e a v o u r C t
Whitney Ave
Shasta AveGoldman Ave
Maureen LnHaynie CtAspen Hills DrGrimes Canyon RdJacobson PlHogan StGabbert Rd Elwin LnN Commerce Ave
Courtney LnHarvester StAvedon RdN Buttercreek Rd
Tu rfw ay R dN Terracemeadow CtNw Cloverdale StOak Glen
M istygrove StMountain Trail StAlderbrook StA r b o r h i ll S t
Havencrest StHoneybrook CtTorino StEmilio CtT ierra R ejada R dClearwood RdMeadow StH e a t h e r d a l e Ct
B r o a d v i e w D r
Flowerwood CtBentcreek RdDalaway Dr23118118Seabiscuit PlAffirmed PlMira Sol DrCity of Moorpark 2018 DistrictingNational Demographics Corporation, January 29, 2018Map 401aProposed Election Sequencing:2020: Districts 4 and one of 1, 2 or 32022: two of 1, 2, or 3Map layers401aCensus BlockLandmark AreaPipeline/Power LineRailroadRiverStreetsWater Area23
District 1 2 3 4 Total
Ideal Total Pop 8,664 8,816 8,606 8,335 34,421
Deviation from ideal 59 211 1 -270 481
% Deviation 0.69% 2.45% 0.01% -3.14% 5.59%
% Hisp 31% 15% 15% 67% 31%
% NH White 57% 71% 73% 27% 57%
% NH Black 2% 2% 2% 2% 2%
% Asian-American 9% 11% 9% 4% 8%
Total 6,116 6,631 6,250 4,479 23,476
% Hisp 19% 12% 13% 50% 21%
% NH White 68% 77% 74% 46% 68%
% NH Black 3% 0% 2% 1% 2%
% Asian/Pac.Isl.10% 9% 10% 3% 8%
Total 5,762 5,803 5,660 3,347 20,573
% Latino est.35% 32% 31% 50% 35%
% Spanish-Surnamed 4% 5% 5% 3% 4%
% Asian-Surnamed 37% 42% 44% 22% 38%
% Filipino-Surnamed 22% 21% 20% 23% 22%
% NH White est.6% 5% 5% 5% 5%
% NH Black 22% 12% 12% 53% 22%
Total 4,735 4,937 4,880 2,503 17,056
% Latino est.36% 33% 31% 52% 36%
% Spanish-Surnamed 4% 4% 4% 3% 4%
% Asian-Surnamed 38% 44% 46% 23% 40%
% Filipino-Surnamed 21% 19% 19% 21% 20%
% NH White est.6% 5% 5% 4% 5%
% NH Black 22% 11% 12% 52% 20%
Total 2,190 3,078 2,977 1,152 9,397
% Latino est.16% 10% 10% 45% 16%
% Spanish-Surnamed 14% 9% 9% 40% 14%
% Asian-Surnamed 3% 5% 3% 3% 4%
% Filipino-Surnamed 1% 1% 1% 1% 1%
% NH White est.78% 81% 85% 48% 78%
% NH Black est.1% 1% 1% 0% 1%
ACS Pop. Est.Total 8,854 9,010 8,736 8,429 35,029
age0-19 27% 24% 27% 31% 27%
age20-60 57% 59% 57% 57% 58%
age60plus 16% 17% 16% 12% 15%
immigrants 16% 12% 16% 27% 18%
naturalized 60% 58% 60% 26% 47%
english 76% 82% 79% 48% 72%
spanish 13% 11% 10% 48% 20%
asian-lang 5% 4% 3% 2% 3%
other lang 6% 4% 8% 2% 5%
Language Fluency Speaks Eng. "Less
than Very Well"10% 6% 8% 23% 12%
hs-grad 54% 47% 47% 54% 50%
bachelor 26% 31% 30% 12% 25%
graduatedegree 9% 16% 17% 4% 12%
Child in Household child-under18 35% 37% 38% 42% 38%
Pct of Pop. Age 16+ employed 65% 65% 67% 63% 65%
income 0-25k 6% 4% 6% 13% 7%
income 25-50k 11% 10% 7% 24% 13%
income 50-75k 16% 9% 14% 21% 15%
income 75-200k 55% 54% 54% 39% 51%
income 200k-plus 11% 23% 19% 3% 15%
single family 95% 92% 97% 56% 86%
multi-family 5% 8% 3% 44% 14%
rented 20% 16% 15% 61% 27%
owned 80% 84% 85% 39% 73%
Total population data from the 2010 Decennial Census.
Surname-based Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database.
Latino voter registration and turnout data are Spanish-surname counts adjusted using Census Population Department
undercount estimates. NH White and NH Black registration and turnout counts estimated by NDC. Citizen Voting Age
Pop., Age, Immigration, and other demographics from the 2012-2016 American Community Survey and Special
Tabulation 5-year data.
Housing Stats
Household Income
Education (among those
age 25+)
Total Pop
City of Moorpark - Map 401a
Language spoken at home
8,605
Immigration
Citizen Voting Age Pop
Age
Voter Registration (Nov
2016)
Voter Turnout (Nov
2016)
Voter Turnout (Nov
2014)
24
3421Oak ParkVilla delArroyoMobile Hm PkMoorparkCommunityColgCollege ViewParkVirginiaColony ParkMoorpark PlzOld TownBusinessDistrictMoorparkVillage CtrMonte VistaNature ParkPeach HillParkMoorparkTown CtrChaparral JrHSVlg Retail &Auto ShopsArroyo VistaCommunityParkMountainMeadows CityParkGlenwoodParkCountryTrail ParkGabbert Canyon ChnnlN 2 Canyon Fire RdCampus RdGraduate CirSwift PlUniversity DrBorges DrBraun CtSeitz CtBeragan St E Los Angeles AveD e l f e n S tMahan CtSosna CtC o l l i n s D r
Pecan AveMarquette St
Varsity StLuther CirReedley StMarquette CirCampus Park DrQueens CtHartford StLa fayett e St
N A u b u r n C i r
N Westwood StE Oxford CirCondor DrNogales AveWhite Sage DrH ig h P tE lk R un LoopE l k s R u n W a y Elkton CtSimmons Way
Bear Fence CtShenandoah WayFishers CtSpring RdSarazen DrChampionship DrBreezy Glen DrWaterworks RdValley RdPrinceton AveCharles StFitch AveScience DrSouthfork RdMiller PkwyFlinn AveWicks RdEverett StFlory Ave2nd StSusan AveRoberts AveEsther AveSherman AveNorfolk CtMillard StMajestic CtTierra Rejada RdC rabapple C tShawnee StB rennan R dC offeetree L n
P e rs im m o n S tOlive StDakota Dr
M aya C irPeach Hill RdVista Del Valle DrMcbeth CtN Cedarpine LnAshbrook LnBella Vista Dr
N Millerton RdN Vistapark DrC l a v e l e A v e Trailcrest DrSunnyslope PlSleepy Wind StView Mesa StWestport StZaharias CtL i ttle r C t
Snead DrCasey RdPoindexter AveLa Palma CtVilla Campesina AveDarlene LnE n d e a v o u r C t
Whitney Ave
Kazuko Ct
Maureen LnHaynie CtAspen Hills DrGrimes Canyon RdJacobson PlHogan StG abbert Rd Elwin LnN Commerce Ave
Courtney LnHarvester StAvedon RdN Buttercreek Rd
T urfw ay R dN Terracemeadow CtNw Cloverdale StWestmont DrCoral Crest CtMountain Trail StAlderbrook StAr b o r h i ll S t
Havencrest StTorino StCountrywood DrBrookwood DrMeadow St
Heather Glen Ct
Gentlewood DrT im b e r V ie w C tBroadview DrHavenridge Ct23118118118Seabiscuit PlAffirmed PlCity of Moorpark 2018 DistrictingNational Demographics Corporation, January 29, 2019Map 402aProposed Election Sequencing:2020: Districts 2 and one of 1, 3 or 42022: two of 1, 3, or 4Map layers402aCensus BlockLandmark AreaPipeline/Power LineRailroadRiverStreetsWater Area25
District 1 2 3 4 Total
Ideal Total Pop 8,664 8,664 8,692 8,401 34,421
Deviation from ideal 59 59 87 -204 291
% Deviation 0.69% 0.69% 1.01% -2.37% 3.38%
% Hisp 31% 60% 13% 21% 31%
% NH White 57% 32% 74% 67% 57%
% NH Black 2% 2% 2% 2% 2%
% Asian-American 9% 5% 10% 9% 8%
Total 6,116 4,920 6,635 5,805 23,476
% Hisp 19% 46% 11% 15% 21%
% NH White 68% 49% 79% 72% 68%
% NH Black 3% 1% 0% 3% 2%
% Asian/Pac.Isl.10% 3% 9% 10% 8%
Total 5,759 3,405 5,936 5,472 20,573
% Latino est.35% 46% 32% 33% 35%
% Spanish-Surnamed 4% 4% 5% 4% 4%
% Asian-Surnamed 37% 27% 43% 41% 38%
% Filipino-Surnamed 22% 23% 21% 21% 22%
% NH White est.6% 5% 5% 5% 5%
% NH Black 22% 46% 11% 18% 22%
Total 4,732 2,623 5,076 4,624 17,056
% Latino est.36% 47% 33% 33% 36%
% Spanish-Surnamed 4% 4% 4% 4% 4%
% Asian-Surnamed 38% 28% 44% 43% 40%
% Filipino-Surnamed 21% 20% 19% 19% 20%
% NH White est.6% 4% 5% 4% 5%
% NH Black 22% 44% 10% 17% 20%
Total 2,188 1,701 2,936 2,572 9,397
% Latino est.16% 36% 8% 10% 16%
% Spanish-Surnamed 14% 33% 7% 9% 14%
% Asian-Surnamed 3% 4% 4% 3% 4%
% Filipino-Surnamed 1% 1% 1% 1% 1%
% NH White est.78% 52% 86% 84% 78%
% NH Black est.1% 1% 0% 1% 1%
ACS Pop. Est.Total 8,854 8,827 8,836 8,513 35,029
age0-19 27% 30% 24% 28% 27%
age20-60 57% 56% 60% 57% 58%
age60plus 16% 14% 17% 15% 15%
immigrants 16% 25% 10% 20% 18%
naturalized 60% 31% 59% 51% 47%
english 76% 54% 85% 72% 72%
spanish 13% 42% 8% 18% 20%
asian-lang 5% 2% 4% 3% 3%
other lang 6% 3% 3% 8% 5%
Language Fluency Speaks Eng. "Less
than Very Well"10% 20% 4% 13% 12%
hs-grad 54% 53% 48% 46% 50%
bachelor 26% 15% 31% 28% 25%
graduatedegree 9% 7% 17% 14% 12%
Child in Household child-under18 35% 41% 37% 39% 38%
Pct of Pop. Age 16+ employed 65% 61% 68% 66% 65%
income 0-25k 6% 12% 3% 8% 7%
income 25-50k 11% 22% 9% 10% 13%
income 50-75k 16% 19% 8% 16% 15%
income 75-200k 55% 36% 61% 50% 51%
income 200k-plus 11% 11% 19% 17% 15%
single family 95% 61% 92% 93% 86%
multi-family 5% 39% 8% 7% 14%
rented 20% 54% 15% 21% 27%
owned 80% 46% 85% 79% 73%
Total population data from the 2010 Decennial Census.
Surname-based Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database.
Latino voter registration and turnout data are Spanish-surname counts adjusted using Census Population Department
undercount estimates. NH White and NH Black registration and turnout counts estimated by NDC. Citizen Voting Age
Pop., Age, Immigration, and other demographics from the 2012-2016 American Community Survey and Special
Tabulation 5-year data.
Housing Stats
Household Income
Education (among those
age 25+)
Total Pop
City of Moorpark - Map 402a
Language spoken at home
8,605
Immigration
Citizen Voting Age Pop
Age
Voter Registration (Nov
2016)
Voter Turnout (Nov
2016)
Voter Turnout (Nov
2014)
26
4321Oak ParkVilla delArroyoMobile Hm PkMoorparkCommunityColgCollege ViewParkVirginiaColony ParkMoorpark PlzOld TownBusinessDistrictMoorparkVillage CtrMonte VistaNature ParkPeach HillParkMoorparkTown CtrChaparral JrHSVlg Retail &Auto ShopsArroyo VistaCommunityParkMountainMeadows CityParkGlenwoodParkCountryTrail ParkGabbert Canyon ChnnlN 2 Canyon Fire RdCampus RdGraduate CirSwift PlUniversity DrBorges DrBraun CtSeitz CtMoorpark CollE Los Angeles AveCampus Park DrMahan CtSosna CtC o l l i n s D r
Pecan AveMarquette St
Varsity StLuther CirReedley StMarquette CirStanford StHartford StQueens CtN Amherst StL af a y e t te S t
N A u b u r n C i r
N Westwood StCollege Heights DrCondor DrNogales AveWhite Sage DrH ig h P tE lk R un LoopE l k s R u n W a y Elkton CtBlack Rock CirShenandoah WayFishers CtSpring RdSarazen DrChampionship DrBreezy Glen DrWaterworks RdValley RdPrinceton AveCharles StFitch AveScience DrSouthfork RdMiller PkwyFlinn AveWicks RdEverett StFlory Ave2nd StSusan AveRoberts AveEsther AveSherman AveNorfolk CtMillard StMajestic CtTierra Rejada RdC rabapple C tScholartree C tB rennan R dMoorpark RdC o ffeetree L n
P e rs im m o n S tOlive StDak ota Dr
M aya Ci rH o p i C t
Peach Hill RdVista Del Valle DrMcbeth CtN Cedarpine LnAshbrook LnBella Vista Dr
N Millerton RdN Vistapark DrN Ashtree StTrailcrest DrSunnyslope PlWilliams Ranch RdSleepy Wind StView Mesa StWestport StZaharias Ct
L i tt l e r Ct
Snead Dr Casey RdPoindexter AveLa Palma CtVilla Campesina AveE n d e a v o u r C t
Whitney Ave
Kazuko Ct
Maureen LnBeltramo Ranch Rd
Haynie CtAspen Hills DrGrimes Canyon RdJacobson PlHogan StGabbert Rd
Trevino DrDarlene LnN Commerce Ave
T ier r a R e ja d a R d
Avedon RdN Buttercreek Rd
T urfw ay R dN Terracemeadow CtN Sunsetmeadow CtSilver Creek StMistygrove StArbor Hill StMountain Trail StRivergrove StBubbling Brook StAlderbrook StHavencrest StAscoli CtCountrywood DrBrookwood DrMeadow St
Heather Glen Ct
Gentlewood DrT im b e r V ie w C tBroadview DrHavenridge Ct23118118Seabiscuit PlCity of Moorpark 2018 DistrictingNational Demographics Corporation, January 29, 2019Proposed Election Sequencing:2020: Districts 1 and one of 2, 3 or 42022: two of 2, 3 or 4Map 406aMap layers406aCensus BlockLandmark AreaPipeline/Power LineRailroadRiverStreetsWater Area27
District 1 2 3 4 Total
Ideal Total Pop 8,399 8,344 8,986 8,692 34,421
Deviation from ideal -206 -261 381 87 642
% Deviation -2.39% -3.03% 4.43% 1.01% 7.46%
% Hisp 63% 30% 21% 13% 31%
% NH White 29% 58% 66% 74% 57%
% NH Black 2% 2% 2% 2% 2%
% Asian-American 5% 9% 9% 10% 8%
Total 4,469 5,969 6,403 6,635 23,476
% Hisp 45% 18% 18% 11% 21%
% NH White 49% 68% 70% 79% 68%
% NH Black 1% 3% 2% 0% 2%
% Asian/Pac.Isl.4% 10% 8% 9% 8%
Total 3,716 5,638 5,282 5,936 20,573
% Latino est.46% 35% 32% 32% 35%
% Spanish-Surnamed 4% 4% 4% 5% 4%
% Asian-Surnamed 27% 37% 42% 43% 38%
% Filipino-Surnamed 23% 22% 21% 21% 22%
% NH White est.5% 6% 5% 5% 5%
% NH Black 46% 22% 16% 11% 22%
Total 2,859 4,632 4,489 5,076 17,056
% Latino est.47% 36% 33% 33% 36%
% Spanish-Surnamed 4% 4% 4% 4% 4%
% Asian-Surnamed 28% 38% 44% 44% 40%
% Filipino-Surnamed 20% 21% 19% 19% 20%
% NH White est.4% 6% 4% 5% 5%
% NH Black 44% 22% 16% 10% 20%
Total 1,390 2,137 2,851 3,018 9,397
% Latino est.34% 16% 15% 8% 16%
% Spanish-Surnamed 31% 14% 13% 7% 14%
% Asian-Surnamed 4% 3% 4% 4% 4%
% Filipino-Surnamed 1% 1% 1% 1% 1%
% NH White est.58% 78% 80% 84% 78%
% NH Black est.1% 1% 1% 0% 1%
ACS Pop. Est.Total 8,552 8,531 9,111 8,836 35,029
age0-19 32% 27% 27% 24% 27%
age20-60 56% 58% 57% 60% 58%
age60plus 13% 16% 16% 17% 15%
immigrants 28% 16% 17% 10% 18%
naturalized 29% 60% 56% 59% 47%
english 49% 77% 75% 85% 72%
spanish 46% 12% 15% 8% 20%
asian-lang 2% 5% 3% 4% 3%
other lang 3% 6% 7% 3% 5%
Language Fluency Speaks Eng. "Less
than Very Well"24% 9% 9% 4% 12%
hs-grad 48% 55% 50% 48% 50%
bachelor 15% 26% 28% 31% 25%
graduatedegree 7% 9% 14% 17% 12%
Child in Household child-under18 44% 34% 37% 37% 38%
Pct of Pop. Age 16+ employed 61% 65% 65% 68% 65%
income 0-25k 12% 6% 8% 3% 7%
income 25-50k 22% 12% 10% 9% 13%
income 50-75k 19% 16% 16% 8% 15%
income 75-200k 36% 55% 49% 61% 51%
income 200k-plus 11% 11% 16% 19% 15%
single family 68% 95% 87% 92% 86%
multi-family 32% 5% 13% 8% 14%
rented 51% 21% 24% 15% 27%
owned 49% 79% 76% 85% 73%
Total population data from the 2010 Decennial Census.
Surname-based Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database.
Latino voter registration and turnout data are Spanish-surname counts adjusted using Census Population Department
undercount estimates. NH White and NH Black registration and turnout counts estimated by NDC. Citizen Voting Age
Pop., Age, Immigration, and other demographics from the 2012-2016 American Community Survey and Special
Tabulation 5-year data.
Housing Stats
Household Income
Education (among those
age 25+)
Total Pop
City of Moorpark - Map 406a
Language spoken at home
8,605
Immigration
Citizen Voting Age Pop
Age
Voter Registration (Nov
2016)
Voter Turnout (Nov
2016)
Voter Turnout (Nov
2014)
28
2341Oak ParkVilla delArroyoMobile Hm PkMoorparkCommunityColgCollege ViewParkCampusCanyon ParkCampus ParkVirginiaColony ParkMoorpark PlzOld TownBusinessDistrictMoorparkVillage CtrMonte VistaNature ParkPeach HillParkCommunityPlaygroundMoorparkTown CtrVlg Retail &Auto ShopsArroyo VistaCommunityParkMountainMeadows CityParkGlenwoodParkCountryTrail ParkGabbert Canyon ChnnlN 2 Canyon Fire RdCampus RdGraduate CirSwift PlAlumni WayBraun CtSeitz CtDoris CtMoorpark CollE Los Angeles AveCampus Park DrP e c a n A v e
Reedley StVarsity StLuther CirMarquette CirQueens CtN C r e i g h t o n S t
N Amherst StLa fayette S t
N A u b u r n C i r
N Westwood StN Fordham StNogales AveWhite Sage DrH ig h P tE lk R un LoopE l k s R u n W a y Elkton CtSimmons Way
Black Rock CirShenandoah WayFishers CtSpring RdSarazen DrChampionship DrBreezy Glen DrWaterworks RdValley RdPrinceton AveCharles StFitch AveScience DrSouthfork RdMiller PkwyFlinn AveWicks RdEverett StFlory Ave2nd StSusan AveRoberts AveEsther AveSherman AveWestcott CtTorridon CtMoorpark Ave Tierra Rejada RdC rabapple C tScholartree C tBrennan RdM oorpark RdC offeetree L nP e rs im m o n S tOlive StDakota Dr
M a ya C irH o p i C t
Stagecoach TrlPeach Hill RdBear Valley RdMcbeth CtRobinwood LnHatfield CtDonnybrook LnBella Vista DrBodega PlFireside Ln
N Vistapark DrHoneybee StCandlewood CtBlairwood DrSunnyslope PlWilliams Ranch RdSleepy Wind StZ a h a r i a s C t
L i t t le r C t
Snead Dr Casey RdPoindexter AveReyes StPark LnFuji StLassen AveTech Cir
Darlene LnE n d e a v o u r C t Sierra AveEverest AveMaureen LnBeltramo Ranch Rd
Haynie CtAspen Hills DrGrimes Canyon RdJacobson PlRawls RdVare CtGabbert Rd
Trevino DrElwin LnN Commerce Ave
T ie rra R e ja d a R d
Avedon RdN Buttercreek Rd
T urfw ay R dDeermeadow StSilver Creek StWalnut Creek RdWestport StWi llow springsLondon Grove CtAlderbrook StA r b o r h ill St
Havencrest StC ed ar Sprin g s StNorthdale DrPinedale RdMeadow St
Heather Glen Ct
Sagewood DrMilano PlSarno CtQuailwood StBroadview DrHavenridge CtD a l a w a y D r2311811823
Seabiscuit PlVia Rey LunaCity of Moorpark 2018 DistrictingNational Demographics Corporation, January 29, 2019Proposed Election Sequencing:2020: Districts 2 and 42022: Districts 1 and 3Map 407aMap layers407aCensus BlockLandmark AreaPipeline/Power LineRailroadRiverStreetsWater Area29
District 1 2 3 4 Total
Ideal Total Pop 8,425 8,598 8,912 8,486 34,421
Deviation from ideal -180 -7 307 -119 487
% Deviation -2.09% -0.08% 3.57% -1.38% 5.66%
% Hisp 16% 66% 16% 28% 31%
% NH White 70% 27% 73% 59% 57%
% NH Black 2% 2% 2% 2% 2%
% Asian-American 11% 4% 8% 10% 8%
Total 6,344 4,637 6,470 6,025 23,476
% Hisp 12% 48% 14% 18% 21%
% NH White 77% 46% 74% 68% 68%
% NH Black 0% 1% 2% 3% 2%
% Asian/Pac.Isl.10% 4% 9% 10% 8%
Total 5,405 3,439 6,055 5,673 20,573
% Latino est.33% 48% 31% 35% 35%
% Spanish-Surnamed 5% 3% 5% 4% 4%
% Asian-Surnamed 42% 24% 44% 37% 38%
% Filipino-Surnamed 21% 23% 20% 22% 22%
% NH White est.5% 5% 5% 6% 5%
% NH Black 14% 50% 12% 21% 22%
Total 4,564 2,594 5,212 4,685 17,056
% Latino est.34% 50% 31% 36% 36%
% Spanish-Surnamed 4% 4% 4% 4% 4%
% Asian-Surnamed 43% 25% 45% 38% 40%
% Filipino-Surnamed 19% 21% 19% 21% 20%
% NH White est.5% 4% 5% 5% 5%
% NH Black 14% 48% 12% 20% 20%
Total 2,856 1,203 3,119 2,219 9,397
% Latino est.12% 42% 10% 14% 16%
% Spanish-Surnamed 11% 38% 9% 12% 14%
% Asian-Surnamed 5% 4% 3% 3% 4%
% Filipino-Surnamed 1% 1% 1% 1% 1%
% NH White est.82% 51% 82% 80% 78%
% NH Black est.1% 0% 1% 1% 1%
ACS Pop. Est.Total 8,602 8,692 9,061 8,674 35,029
age0-19 24% 31% 27% 27% 27%
age20-60 59% 56% 57% 58% 58%
age60plus 17% 13% 16% 16% 15%
immigrants 13% 28% 14% 16% 18%
naturalized 57% 28% 59% 60% 47%
english 80% 48% 81% 76% 72%
spanish 13% 46% 9% 13% 20%
asian-lang 3% 3% 3% 5% 3%
other lang 4% 3% 7% 6% 5%
Language Fluency Speaks Eng. "Less
than Very Well"7% 23% 7% 10% 12%
hs-grad 48% 51% 47% 55% 50%
bachelor 31% 14% 29% 26% 25%
graduatedegree 14% 6% 18% 9% 12%
Child in Household child-under18 36% 42% 39% 34% 38%
Pct of Pop. Age 16+ employed 64% 63% 67% 65% 65%
income 0-25k 5% 13% 6% 6% 7%
income 25-50k 12% 22% 7% 12% 13%
income 50-75k 10% 21% 13% 16% 15%
income 75-200k 52% 40% 55% 55% 51%
income 200k-plus 22% 4% 20% 11% 15%
single family 87% 61% 98% 95% 86%
multi-family 13% 39% 2% 5% 14%
rented 20% 56% 14% 21% 27%
owned 80% 44% 86% 79% 73%
Total population data from the 2010 Decennial Census.
Surname-based Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database.
Latino voter registration and turnout data are Spanish-surname counts adjusted using Census Population Department
undercount estimates. NH White and NH Black registration and turnout counts estimated by NDC. Citizen Voting Age
Pop., Age, Immigration, and other demographics from the 2012-2016 American Community Survey and Special
Tabulation 5-year data.
Housing Stats
Household Income
Education (among those
age 25+)
Total Pop
City of Moorpark - Map 407a
Language spoken at home
8,605
Immigration
Citizen Voting Age Pop
Age
Voter Registration (Nov
2016)
Voter Turnout (Nov
2016)
Voter Turnout (Nov
2014)
30
31
District 1 2 3 4 Total
Ideal Total Pop 8,270 8,847 8,823 8,481 34,421
Deviation from ideal -335 242 218 -124 577
% Deviation -3 89% 2 81% 2 53% -1 44% 6 71%
% Hisp 17% 64% 16% 28% 31%
% NH White 70% 28% 73% 59% 57%
% NH Black 2% 2% 2% 2% 2%
% Asian-American 10% 5% 9% 10% 8%
Total 6,242 4,805 6,411 6,019 23,476
% Hisp 13% 46% 14% 18% 21%
% NH White 77% 48% 74% 68% 68%
% NH Black 0% 1% 2% 3% 2%
% Asian/Pac Isl 9% 4% 9% 10% 8%
Total 5,336 3,574 6,024 5,638 20,573
% Latino est 33% 47% 31% 35% 35%
% Spanish-Surnamed 5% 4% 5% 4% 4%
% Asian-Surnamed 41% 25% 44% 37% 38%
% Filipino-Surnamed 21% 23% 20% 22% 22%
% NH White est 5% 5% 5% 6% 5%
% NH Black 14% 49% 12% 21% 22%
Total 4,506 2,707 5,186 4,656 17,056
% Latino est 34% 49% 31% 36% 36%
% Spanish-Surnamed 4% 4% 4% 4% 4%
% Asian-Surnamed 43% 26% 45% 38% 40%
% Filipino-Surnamed 19% 21% 19% 21% 20%
% NH White est 5% 4% 5% 5% 5%
% NH Black 14% 47% 12% 20% 20%
Total 2,654 1,434 3,104 2,205 9,397
% Latino est 11% 38% 10% 14% 16%
% Spanish-Surnamed 10% 34% 9% 12% 14%
% Asian-Surnamed 4% 4% 3% 3% 4%
% Filipino-Surnamed 1% 1% 1% 1% 1%
% NH White est 83% 54% 82% 80% 78%
% NH Black est 1% 1% 1% 1% 1%
ACS Pop Est Total 8,436 8,953 8,971 8,669 35,029
age0-19 23% 31% 27% 27% 27%
age20-60 59% 56% 57% 58% 58%
age60plus 17% 13% 16% 16% 15%
immigrants 13% 28% 14% 16% 18%
naturalized 57% 29% 59% 60% 47%
english 81% 49% 81% 76% 72%
spanish 13% 46% 9% 13% 20%
asian-lang 3% 3% 3% 5% 3%
other lang 4% 3% 7% 6% 5%
Language Fluency Speaks Eng "Less
than Very Well"6% 23% 7% 10% 12%
hs-grad 48% 51% 47% 55% 50%
bachelor 31% 14% 29% 26% 25%
graduatedegree 14% 6% 18% 9% 12%
Child in Household child-under18 36% 42% 39% 34% 38%
Pct of Pop Age 16+ employed 65% 63% 67% 65% 65%
income 0-25k 5% 13% 6% 6% 7%
income 25-50k 12% 21% 7% 12% 13%
income 50-75k 10% 20% 13% 16% 15%
income 75-200k 52% 40% 55% 55% 51%
income 200k-plus 21% 6% 20% 11% 15%
single family 87% 63% 98% 95% 86%
multi-family 13% 37% 2% 5% 14%
rented 20% 55% 14% 21% 27%
owned 80% 45% 86% 79% 73%
Total population data from the 2010 Decennial Census.
Surname-based Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database.
Latino voter registration and turnout data are Spanish-surname counts adjusted using Census Population Department
undercount estimates. NH White and NH Black registration and turnout counts estimated by NDC. Citizen Voting Age
Pop., Age, Immigration, and other demographics from the 2012-2016 American Community Survey and Special
Tabulation 5-year data.
Housing Stats
Household Income
Education (among those
age 25+)
Total Pop
City of Moorpark - Map 411
Language spoken at home
8,605
Immigration
Citizen Voting Age Pop
Age
Voter Registration (Nov
2016)
Voter Turnout (Nov
2016)
Voter Turnout (Nov
2014)
32
3412Oak ParkVilla delArroyoMobile Hm PkMoorparkCommunityColgCollege ViewParkCampusCanyon ParkVirginiaColony ParkMoorpark PlzOld TownBusinessDistrictMoorparkVillage CtrMonte VistaNature ParkPeach HillParkCommunityPlaygroundMoorparkTown CtrChaparral JrHSVlg Retail &Auto ShopsArroyo VistaCommunityParkMountainMeadows CityParkGlenwoodParkCountryTrail ParkGabbert Canyon ChnnlN 2 Canyon Fire RdCampus RdGraduate CirSwift PlAlumni WayBraun CtSeitz CtDoris CtMoorpark CollE Los Angeles AveCampus Park DrP e c a n A v e
Alyssas CtBambi CtVarsity StLuther CirP e n n S t
Marquette CirReedley StN Rand St
Queens CtE Stanford StHartford StL af ay e t te St
N A u b u r n C i r
N Westwood StE Oxford CirCondor DrNogales AveWhite Sage DrH ig h P tE lk R un LoopE l ks R u n W a y Elkton CtSimmons Way
Black Rock CirShenandoah WayFishers CtSpring RdSarazen DrChampionship DrBreezy Glen DrWaterworks RdValley RdPrinceton AveCharles StFitch AveScience DrSouthfork RdMiller PkwyFlinn AveWicks RdEverett StFlory Ave2nd StSusan AveRoberts AveEsther AveSherman AveWestcott CtTorridon CtMoorpark Ave Tierra Rejada RdCra bapple C tScholartree C tBrennan RdM oorpark RdC offeetree L n
P e rs im m o n S tOlive StD akota Dr
M aya C irH o p i C t
Stagecoach TrlPeach Hill RdMcbeth CtN Cedarpine LnRobinwood LnHatfield CtBella Vista DrBodega PlFireside Ln
N Vistapark DrHoneybee StTrailcrest DrHidden Pine CtWilliams Ranch RdSleepy Wind StView Mesa StCamden CtZaharias Ct
Lit tler C t
Snead Dr Casey RdPoindexter AveShasta AvePark LnGisler RdDarlene LnE n d e a v o u r C t
Whitney Ave
Kazuko Ct
Maureen LnBeltramo Ranch Rd
Haynie CtAspen Hills DrGrimes Canyon RdJacobson PlRawls RdVare CtGabbert Rd
Trevino DrElwin LnN Commerce Ave
T ie rra R e ja d a R d
Avedon RdN Buttercreek Rd
T urfw ay R dN Terracemeadow CtN Sunsetmeadow CtSilver Creek StWestport StM istygrove StArbor Hill StMountain Trail StW illow springsBubbling Brook StAlderbrook StHavencrest StAscoli CtNorthdale DrPinedale RdSagewood DrMeadow St
Heather Glen Ct
T im b e r V ie w C tM a n o r v i e w C t
Broadview DrHavenridge Ct2311811811823Alysheba DrVia Rey LunaCity of Moorpark 2018 DistrictingNational Demographics Corporation, January 29, 2019Proposed Election Sequencing:2020: Districts 1 and one of 2, 3 or 42022: two of 2, 3 or 4Map 412aMap layers412aCensus BlockLandmark AreaPipeline/Power LineRailroadRiverStreetsWater Area33
District 1 2 3 4 Total
Ideal Total Pop 8,362 8,664 8,911 8,484 34,421
Deviation from ideal -243 59 306 -121 549
% Deviation -2.82% 0.69% 3.56% -1.41% 6.38%
% Hisp 64% 31% 14% 18% 31%
% NH White 28% 57% 73% 69% 57%
% NH Black 2% 2% 2% 2% 2%
% Asian-American 5% 9% 9% 9% 8%
Total 4,566 6,116 6,664 6,130 23,476
% Hisp 47% 19% 11% 15% 21%
% NH White 47% 68% 78% 72% 68%
% NH Black 1% 3% 0% 2% 2%
% Asian/Pac.Isl.4% 10% 9% 9% 8%
Total 3,386 5,754 6,033 5,399 20,573
% Latino est.46% 35% 33% 32% 35%
% Spanish-Surnamed 4% 4% 4% 4% 4%
% Asian-Surnamed 26% 37% 42% 43% 38%
% Filipino-Surnamed 23% 22% 21% 21% 22%
% NH White est.5% 6% 5% 5% 5%
% NH Black 47% 22% 13% 15% 22%
Total 2,587 4,728 5,135 4,606 17,056
% Latino est.48% 36% 33% 32% 36%
% Spanish-Surnamed 4% 4% 4% 4% 4%
% Asian-Surnamed 27% 38% 43% 44% 40%
% Filipino-Surnamed 21% 21% 19% 19% 20%
% NH White est.4% 6% 5% 4% 5%
% NH Black 45% 22% 12% 15% 20%
Total 1,238 2,187 3,029 2,943 9,397
% Latino est.34% 16% 10% 14% 16%
% Spanish-Surnamed 31% 14% 9% 12% 14%
% Asian-Surnamed 4% 3% 4% 4% 4%
% Filipino-Surnamed 1% 1% 1% 1% 1%
% NH White est.58% 78% 83% 81% 78%
% NH Black est.1% 1% 0% 1% 1%
ACS Pop. Est.Total 8,516 8,854 9,056 8,604 35,029
age0-19 31% 27% 24% 27% 27%
age20-60 56% 57% 60% 57% 58%
age60plus 13% 16% 17% 16% 15%
immigrants 28% 16% 11% 17% 18%
naturalized 28% 60% 57% 58% 47%
english 49% 76% 84% 77% 72%
spanish 47% 13% 10% 13% 20%
asian-lang 2% 5% 4% 3% 3%
other lang 3% 6% 3% 8% 5%
Language Fluency Speaks Eng. "Less
than Very Well"24% 10% 5% 9% 12%
hs-grad 49% 54% 49% 49% 50%
bachelor 14% 26% 30% 29% 25%
graduatedegree 7% 9% 16% 15% 12%
Child in Household child-under18 44% 35% 37% 37% 38%
Pct of Pop. Age 16+ employed 61% 65% 68% 66% 65%
income 0-25k 12% 6% 4% 8% 7%
income 25-50k 22% 11% 10% 9% 13%
income 50-75k 19% 16% 9% 15% 15%
income 75-200k 36% 55% 59% 51% 51%
income 200k-plus 11% 11% 18% 18% 15%
single family 66% 95% 88% 91% 86%
multi-family 34% 5% 12% 9% 14%
rented 53% 20% 19% 20% 27%
owned 47% 80% 81% 80% 73%
Total population data from the 2010 Decennial Census.
Surname-based Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database.
Latino voter registration and turnout data are Spanish-surname counts adjusted using Census Population Department
undercount estimates. NH White and NH Black registration and turnout counts estimated by NDC. Citizen Voting Age
Pop., Age, Immigration, and other demographics from the 2012-2016 American Community Survey and Special
Tabulation 5-year data.
Housing Stats
Household Income
Education (among those
age 25+)
Total Pop
City of Moorpark - Map 412a
Language spoken at home
8,605
Immigration
Citizen Voting Age Pop
Age
Voter Registration (Nov
2016)
Voter Turnout (Nov
2016)
Voter Turnout (Nov
2014)
34
35
District 1 2 3 4 Total
Ideal Total Pop 8,596 8,461 8,815 8,549 34,421
Deviation from ideal -9 -144 210 -56 354
% Deviation -0 10% -1 67% 2 44% -0 65% 4 11%
% Hisp 16% 64% 18% 28% 31%
% NH White 70% 28% 71% 59% 57%
% NH Black 2% 2% 1% 2% 2%
% Asian-American 10% 5% 8% 10% 8%
Total 6,381 4,530 6,465 6,101 23,476
% Hisp 13% 45% 16% 17% 21%
% NH White 76% 48% 74% 68% 68%
% NH Black 1% 1% 2% 3% 2%
% Asian/Pac Isl 10% 6% 7% 10% 8%
Total 5,487 3,547 5,750 5,788 20,573
% Latino est 33% 45% 32% 35% 35%
% Spanish-Surnamed 5% 4% 4% 4% 4%
% Asian-Surnamed 41% 27% 43% 37% 38%
% Filipino-Surnamed 21% 23% 20% 22% 22%
% NH White est 5% 5% 5% 6% 5%
% NH Black 14% 46% 14% 21% 22%
Total 4,636 2,719 4,916 4,784 17,056
% Latino est 34% 47% 32% 36% 36%
% Spanish-Surnamed 4% 4% 4% 4% 4%
% Asian-Surnamed 43% 28% 44% 38% 40%
% Filipino-Surnamed 19% 21% 19% 20% 20%
% NH White est 5% 4% 5% 5% 5%
% NH Black 14% 44% 14% 20% 20%
Total 2,887 1,194 3,049 2,267 9,397
% Latino est 12% 34% 13% 14% 16%
% Spanish-Surnamed 11% 31% 12% 12% 14%
% Asian-Surnamed 5% 4% 3% 3% 4%
% Filipino-Surnamed 1% 1% 1% 1% 1%
% NH White est 82% 52% 82% 80% 78%
% NH Black est 1% 0% 1% 1% 1%
ACS Pop Est Total 8,784 8,546 8,961 8,738 35,029
age0-19 24% 32% 26% 27% 27%
age20-60 59% 56% 58% 58% 58%
age60plus 17% 13% 16% 16% 15%
immigrants 13% 29% 14% 16% 18%
naturalized 56% 30% 58% 60% 47%
english 80% 48% 81% 76% 72%
spanish 13% 46% 10% 13% 20%
asian-lang 3% 3% 3% 5% 3%
other lang 4% 3% 6% 6% 5%
Language Fluency Speaks Eng "Less
than Very Well"6% 24% 7% 10% 12%
hs-grad 48% 49% 49% 54% 50%
bachelor 30% 15% 29% 26% 25%
graduatedegree 15% 6% 17% 9% 12%
Child in Household child-under18 36% 43% 38% 34% 38%
Pct of Pop Age 16+ employed 64% 64% 67% 65% 65%
income 0-25k 5% 13% 6% 6% 7%
income 25-50k 12% 19% 9% 12% 13%
income 50-75k 10% 20% 14% 16% 15%
income 75-200k 52% 42% 53% 55% 51%
income 200k-plus 22% 6% 18% 11% 15%
single family 88% 67% 93% 95% 86%
multi-family 12% 33% 7% 5% 14%
rented 20% 52% 18% 21% 27%
owned 80% 48% 82% 79% 73%
Total population data from the 2010 Decennial Census.
Surname-based Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database.
Latino voter registration and turnout data are Spanish-surname counts adjusted using Census Population Department
undercount estimates. NH White and NH Black registration and turnout counts estimated by NDC. Citizen Voting Age
Pop., Age, Immigration, and other demographics from the 2012-2016 American Community Survey and Special
Tabulation 5-year data.
Housing Stats
Household Income
Education (among those
age 25+)
Total Pop
City of Moorpark - Map 413
Language spoken at home
8,605
Immigration
Citizen Voting Age Pop
Age
Voter Registration (Nov
2016)
Voter Turnout (Nov
2016)
Voter Turnout (Nov
2014)
36
4321Oak ParkVilla delArroyoMobile Hm PkMoorparkCommunityColgCollege ViewParkCampus ParkVirginiaColony ParkMoorpark PlzOld TownBusinessDistrictMoorparkVillage CtrPeach HillParkChaparral JrHSVlg Retail &Auto ShopsArroyo VistaCommunityParkMountainMeadows CityParkGlenwoodParkCountryTrail ParkGabbert Canyon ChnnlN 2 Canyon Fire RdCampus RdGraduate CirSwift PlBraun CtDoris CtBe ragan S t E Los Angeles AveD e l f en S t
Thionnet PlCollins DrPecan AveBenwood DrCampus Park DrVarsity StLuther CirMarquette StLoyola StQueens CtCornell CirPrinceton Ave
L afayette St
N A u b u r n C i r
N Westwood StCollege H eights DrCondor DrNogales AveWhite Sage DrH ig h P tE lk R un LoopE l k s R u n W a y Elkton CtBlack Rock CirShenandoah WayFishers CtSpring RdSarazen DrChampionship DrBreezy Glen DrWaterworks RdValley RdH e d y la nd C tFitch AveScience DrSouthfork RdFlinn AveWicks RdBonnie View RdWalnut St2nd StSusan AveRoberts AveEsther AveSherman AveFlory AveWestcott CtMajestic CtTierra Rejada RdC rabapple C tShawnee StBrennan R dC offeetree L n
P e rs imm o n S tM iller P k wy Dakota Dr
M a y a C irStagecoach TrlPeach Hill RdBear Valley RdVista Del Valle DrDonnybrook LnAshbrook LnBella Vista Dr
N Millerton RdN Vistapark DrC l a v e l e A v e Blairwood DrSunnyslope PlSleepy Wind StZaharias CtL it tle r Ct
Snead DrCasey RdPoindexter AveGisler RdDarlene LnE n d e a v o u r C t
Whitney Ave
Shasta AveGoldman Ave
Maureen LnHaynie CtAspen Hills DrGrimes Canyon RdJacobson PlHogan StGabbert Rd Elwin LnN Commerce Ave
Courtney LnHarvester StAvedon RdN Buttercreek Rd
Tu rfw ay R dN Terracemeadow CtNw Cloverdale StOak Glen
M istygrove StMountain Trail StAlderbrook StA r b o r h i ll S t
Havencrest StHoneybrook CtTorino StEmilio CtT ierra R ejada R dClearwood RdMeadow StH e a t h e r d a l e Ct
B r o a d v i e w D r
Flowerwood CtBentcreek RdDalaway Dr23118118Seabiscuit PlAffirmed PlMira Sol DrCity of Moorpark 2018 DistrictingNational Demographics Corporation, January 16, 2019Proposed Election Sequencing:2020: District 4 and one of 1, 2, or 32022: two of 1, 2, or 3Map 418Map layers418Census BlockLandmark AreaPipeline/Power LineRailroadRiverStreetsWater Area37
District 1 2 3 4 Total
Ideal Total Pop 8,698 8,649 8,739 8,335 34,421
Deviation from ideal 93 44 134 -270 404
% Deviation 1.08% 0.51% 1.56% -3.14% 4.69%
% Hisp 15% 31% 15% 67% 31%
% NH White 71% 57% 72% 27% 57%
% NH Black 2% 2% 2% 2% 2%
% Asian-American 11% 9% 10% 4% 8%
Total 6,520 6,108 6,369 4,479 23,476
% Hisp 12% 19% 13% 50% 21%
% NH White 77% 68% 74% 46% 68%
% NH Black 0% 3% 2% 1% 2%
% Asian/Pac.Isl.9% 10% 10% 3% 8%
Total 5,717 5,757 5,751 3,347 20,573
% Latino est.32% 35% 31% 50% 35%
% Spanish-Surnamed 5% 4% 5% 3% 4%
% Asian-Surnamed 42% 37% 44% 22% 38%
% Filipino-Surnamed 21% 22% 20% 23% 22%
% NH White est.5% 6% 5% 5% 5%
% NH Black 12% 22% 12% 53% 22%
Total 4,864 4,732 4,957 2,503 17,056
% Latino est.33% 36% 31% 52% 36%
% Spanish-Surnamed 4% 4% 4% 3% 4%
% Asian-Surnamed 44% 38% 46% 23% 40%
% Filipino-Surnamed 19% 21% 19% 21% 20%
% NH White est.5% 6% 5% 4% 5%
% NH Black 12% 22% 12% 52% 20%
Total 3,032 2,188 3,025 1,152 9,397
% Latino est.10% 16% 10% 45% 16%
% Spanish-Surnamed 9% 14% 9% 40% 14%
% Asian-Surnamed 5% 3% 3% 3% 4%
% Filipino-Surnamed 1% 1% 1% 1% 1%
% NH White est.81% 78% 85% 48% 78%
% NH Black est.1% 1% 1% 0% 1%
ACS Pop. Est.Total 8,890 8,838 8,871 8,429 35,029
age0-19 24% 27% 27% 31% 27%
age20-60 59% 57% 57% 57% 58%
age60plus 17% 16% 16% 12% 15%
immigrants 12% 16% 16% 27% 18%
naturalized 58% 60% 60% 26% 47%
english 82% 76% 79% 48% 72%
spanish 11% 13% 10% 48% 20%
asian-lang 3% 5% 3% 2% 3%
other lang 4% 6% 7% 2% 5%
Language Fluency Speaks Eng. "Less
than Very Well"6% 10% 8% 23% 12%
hs-grad 47% 54% 47% 54% 50%
bachelor 31% 26% 30% 12% 25%
graduatedegree 16% 9% 17% 4% 12%
Child in Household child-under18 37% 35% 38% 42% 38%
Pct of Pop. Age 16+ employed 65% 65% 67% 63% 65%
income 0-25k 4% 6% 6% 13% 7%
income 25-50k 10% 11% 7% 24% 13%
income 50-75k 9% 16% 14% 21% 15%
income 75-200k 54% 55% 54% 39% 51%
income 200k-plus 23% 11% 19% 3% 15%
single family 92% 95% 97% 56% 86%
multi-family 8% 5% 3% 44% 14%
rented 16% 20% 15% 61% 27%
owned 84% 80% 85% 39% 73%
Total population data from the 2010 Decennial Census.
Surname-based Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database.
Latino voter registration and turnout data are Spanish-surname counts adjusted using Census Population Department
undercount estimates. NH White and NH Black registration and turnout counts estimated by NDC. Citizen Voting Age
Pop., Age, Immigration, and other demographics from the 2012-2016 American Community Survey and Special Tabulation
5-year data.
Housing Stats
Household Income
Education (among those
age 25+)
Total Pop
City of Moorpark - Map 418
Language spoken at home
8,605
Immigration
Citizen Voting Age Pop
Age
Voter Registration (Nov
2016)
Voter Turnout (Nov
2016)
Voter Turnout (Nov
2014)
38
4321Oak ParkVilla delArroyoMobile Hm PkMoorparkCommunityColgCollege ViewParkCampusCanyon ParkVirginiaColony ParkMoorpark PlzOld TownBusinessDistrictMoorparkVillage CtrMonte VistaNature ParkPeach HillParkCommunityPlaygroundChaparral JrHSVlg Retail &Auto ShopsArroyo VistaCommunityParkMountainMeadows CityParkGlenwoodParkCountryTrail ParkGabbert Canyon ChnnlN 2 Canyon Fire RdCampus RdGraduate CirSwift PlAlumni WayBraun CtSeitz CtDoris CtMoorpark CollE Los Angeles AveCampus Park DrP e c a n A v e
Alyssas CtBambi CtVarsity StLuther CirP en n S t
Marquette CirReedley StQueens CtHartford StE Stanford StLafa ye tte S t
N A u b u r n C i r
N Westwood StE Oxford CirCondor DrNogales AveWhite Sage DrH ig h P tE lk R un LoopE l k s R u n W a y Elkton CtSimmons Way
Black Rock CirBlue Ridge WayFishers CtSpring RdSarazen DrChampionship DrBreezy Glen DrWaterworks RdValley RdPrinceton AveCharles StFitch AveScience DrSouthfork RdMiller PkwyFlinn AveWicks RdEverett StFlory Ave2nd StSusan AveRoberts AveEsther AveSherman AveWestcott CtTorridon CtMoorpark Ave Tierra Rejada RdC rabapple C tScholartree C tBrennan RdMoorpark RdC o ffeetree L n
P e rs im m o n S tOlive StDak ota Dr
M a ya C irH o p i C t
Stagecoach TrlPeach Hill RdMcbeth CtN Cedarpine LnRobinwood LnHatfield CtAshbrook LnAdonis Pl
Bella Vista Dr
Fireside Ln
N Millerton RdN Vistapark DrN Ashtree StTrailcrest DrH idden Pine CtN Colibri Ct
Pheasant Run StZ a h a r ia s Ct
L it t le r C t
Snead DrCasey RdPoindexter AveShasta AvePark LnGisler RdDarlene LnE n d e a v o u r Ct
Whitney Ave
Kazuko Ct
Maureen LnBeltramo Ranch Rd
Haynie CtAspen Hills DrGrimes Canyon RdJacobson PlRawls RdVare CtGabbert R d
Trevino DrElwin LnN Commerce Ave
T ie rra R e ja d a R d
Avedon RdN Buttercreek Rd
T urfw ay R dN Terracemeadow CtNw Cloverdale St
Brookhurst CtCliffrose AveHillshire CtM istygrove StArbor Hill StMountain Trail StW illow springsBubbling Brook StAlderbrook StHavencrest StAscoli CtC learw ood R d
P inedale R dMeadow St
Heather Glen Ct
T im b e rd a le R d
W e s td a le R d T im b e r V ie w C tLaurelview D rM a n o r v i e w C t
Broadview DrHavenridge Ct2311811811823Alysheba DrVia Rey LunaCity of Moorpark 2018 DistrictingNational Demographics Corporation, January 16, 2019Proposed Election Sequencing:2020: District 4 and one of 1, 2, or 32022: two of 1, 2, or 3Map 418aMap layers418aCensus BlockLandmark AreaPipeline/Power LineRailroadRiverStreetsWater Area39
District 1 2 3 4 Total
Ideal Total Pop 8,698 8,664 8,724 8,335 34,421
Deviation from ideal 93 59 119 -270 389
% Deviation 1.08% 0.69% 1.38% -3.14% 4.52%
% Hisp 15% 31% 15% 67% 31%
% NH White 71% 57% 73% 27% 57%
% NH Black 2% 2% 2% 2% 2%
% Asian-American 11% 9% 10% 4% 8%
Total 6,520 6,116 6,361 4,479 23,476
% Hisp 12% 19% 13% 50% 21%
% NH White 77% 68% 74% 46% 68%
% NH Black 0% 3% 2% 1% 2%
% Asian/Pac.Isl.9% 10% 10% 3% 8%
Total 5,717 5,762 5,746 3,347 20,573
% Latino est.32% 35% 31% 50% 35%
% Spanish-Surnamed 5% 4% 5% 3% 4%
% Asian-Surnamed 42% 37% 44% 22% 38%
% Filipino-Surnamed 21% 22% 20% 23% 22%
% NH White est.5% 6% 5% 5% 5%
% NH Black 12% 22% 12% 53% 22%
Total 4,864 4,735 4,954 2,503 17,056
% Latino est.33% 36% 31% 52% 36%
% Spanish-Surnamed 4% 4% 4% 3% 4%
% Asian-Surnamed 44% 38% 46% 23% 40%
% Filipino-Surnamed 19% 21% 19% 21% 20%
% NH White est.5% 6% 5% 4% 5%
% NH Black 12% 22% 12% 52% 20%
Total 3,032 2,190 3,023 1,152 9,397
% Latino est.10% 16% 10% 45% 16%
% Spanish-Surnamed 9% 14% 9% 40% 14%
% Asian-Surnamed 5% 3% 3% 3% 4%
% Filipino-Surnamed 1% 1% 1% 1% 1%
% NH White est.81% 78% 85% 48% 78%
% NH Black est.1% 1% 1% 0% 1%
ACS Pop. Est.Total 8,890 8,854 8,856 8,429 35,029
age0-19 24% 27% 27% 31% 27%
age20-60 59% 57% 57% 57% 58%
age60plus 17% 16% 16% 12% 15%
immigrants 12% 16% 16% 27% 18%
naturalized 58% 60% 60% 26% 47%
english 82% 76% 79% 48% 72%
spanish 11% 13% 10% 48% 20%
asian-lang 3% 5% 3% 2% 3%
other lang 4% 6% 7% 2% 5%
Language Fluency Speaks Eng. "Less
than Very Well"6% 10% 8% 23% 12%
hs-grad 47% 54% 47% 54% 50%
bachelor 31% 26% 30% 12% 25%
graduatedegree 16% 9% 17% 4% 12%
Child in Household child-under18 37% 35% 38% 42% 38%
Pct of Pop. Age 16+ employed 65% 65% 67% 63% 65%
income 0-25k 4% 6% 6% 13% 7%
income 25-50k 10% 11% 7% 24% 13%
income 50-75k 9% 16% 14% 21% 15%
income 75-200k 54% 55% 54% 39% 51%
income 200k-plus 23% 11% 20% 3% 15%
single family 92% 95% 97% 56% 86%
multi-family 8% 5% 3% 44% 14%
rented 16% 20% 15% 61% 27%
owned 84% 80% 85% 39% 73%
Total population data from the 2010 Decennial Census.
Surname-based Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database.
Latino voter registration and turnout data are Spanish-surname counts adjusted using Census Population Department
undercount estimates. NH White and NH Black registration and turnout counts estimated by NDC. Citizen Voting Age
Pop., Age, Immigration, and other demographics from the 2012-2016 American Community Survey and Special
Tabulation 5-year data.
Housing Stats
Household Income
Education (among those
age 25+)
Total Pop
City of Moorpark - Map 418a
Language spoken at home
8,605
Immigration
Citizen Voting Age Pop
Age
Voter Registration (Nov
2016)
Voter Turnout (Nov
2016)
Voter Turnout (Nov
2014)
40
4321Oak ParkVilla delArroyoMobile Hm PkMoorparkCommunityColgCollege ViewParkCampus ParkVirginiaColony ParkMoorpark PlzOld TownBusinessDistrictMoorparkVillage CtrMonte VistaNature ParkPeach HillParkMoorparkTown CtrChaparral JrHSVlg Retail &Auto ShopsArroyo VistaCommunityParkMountainMeadows CityParkGlenwoodParkCountryTrail ParkGabbert Canyon ChnnlN 2 Canyon Fire RdCampus RdGraduate CirSwift PlAlumni WayBraun CtSeitz CtCollins DrMoorpark CollE Los Angeles AveCampus Park DrBittner PlSosna CtMonroe AveReedley StVarsity StLuther CirMarquette CirQueens CtN C r e ig h t o n S t
N Amherst StL a faye t t e St
N A u b u r n C i r
N Westwood StN Fordham StNogales AveWhite Sage DrH ig h P tE lk R un LoopE l k s R u n W a y Elkton CtSimmons Way
Bear Fence CtShenandoah WayFishers CtSpring RdSarazen DrChampionship DrBreezy Glen DrWaterworks RdValley RdPrinceton AveCharles StFitch AveScience DrSouthfork RdMiller PkwyFlinn AveWicks RdEverett St2nd StSusan AveRoberts AveEsther AveSherman AveNorfolk CtMillard StMajestic CtTierra Rejada RdC rabapple C tScholartree C tBrennan RdM oorpark RdC offeetree L n
P e rs im m o n S tOlive StDak ota Dr
M a ya C irH o p i Ct
Peach Hill RdBear Valley RdVista Del Valle DrMcbeth CtDonnybrook LnAshbrook LnBella Vista Dr
N Millerton RdN Vistapark DrN Ashtree StBlairwood DrSunnyslope PlChristian Barrett DrSleepy Wind StZaharias Ct
L i tt le r C t
Snead Dr Casey RdPoindexter AvePark LnLa Palma CtE n d e a v o u r C t
Whitney Ave
Kazuko Ct
Maureen LnB e l t r a m o R a nc h R d
Haynie CtAspen Hills DrGrimes Canyon RdJacobson PlHogan StGabbert Rd
Trevino DrDarlene LnN Commerce Ave
T ie rra R e ja d a R d
Avedon RdN Buttercreek Rd
T urfw ay R dN Sunsetmeadow Ct Brookhurst CtCliffrose AveM istygrove StArbor Hill StMountain Trail StW illow springsAlderbrook StHavencrest StHoneybrook CtTorino StEmilio CtQuailcreek CtNorthdale DrPinedale RdSagewood DrMeadow St
Heather Glen Ct
T im b er V ie w C tM a n o r v i e w C t
Broadview DrHavenridge CtD a l a w a y D r23118118118
Seabiscuit PlCity of Moorpark 2018 DistrictingNational Demographics Corporation, January 29, 2019Proposed Election Sequencing:2020: District 2 and one of 1 or 42022: District 3 and one of 1 or 4Map 421aMap layers421aCensus BlockLandmark AreaPipeline/Power LineRailroadRiverStreetsWater Area41
District 1 2 3 4 Total
Ideal Total Pop 8,561 8,731 8,993 8,136 34,421
Deviation from ideal -44 126 388 -469 857
% Deviation -0.51% 1.46% 4.51% -5.45% 9.96%
% Hisp 20% 26% 63% 15% 31%
% NH White 67% 61% 29% 74% 57%
% NH Black 2% 2% 2% 2% 2%
% Asian-American 10% 10% 5% 8% 8%
Total 6,269 6,204 4,990 6,013 23,476
% Hisp 14% 15% 45% 15% 21%
% NH White 75% 70% 49% 75% 68%
% NH Black 0% 3% 1% 2% 2%
% Asian/Pac.Isl.9% 11% 5% 7% 8%
Total 5,340 5,947 3,724 5,561 20,573
% Latino est.33% 35% 46% 31% 35%
% Spanish-Surnamed 5% 4% 4% 4% 4%
% Asian-Surnamed 41% 37% 26% 44% 38%
% Filipino-Surnamed 21% 22% 23% 20% 22%
% NH White est.5% 6% 5% 5% 5%
% NH Black 15% 20% 48% 12% 22%
Total 4,498 4,923 2,833 4,801 17,056
% Latino est.34% 36% 48% 31% 36%
% Spanish-Surnamed 5% 4% 4% 4% 4%
% Asian-Surnamed 42% 38% 27% 45% 40%
% Filipino-Surnamed 19% 20% 21% 19% 20%
% NH White est.5% 5% 4% 5% 5%
% NH Black 14% 20% 46% 12% 20%
Total 2,797 2,359 1,320 2,921 9,397
% Latino est.13% 14% 40% 10% 16%
% Spanish-Surnamed 11% 12% 36% 9% 14%
% Asian-Surnamed 5% 3% 4% 3% 4%
% Filipino-Surnamed 1% 1% 1% 1% 1%
% NH White est.81% 81% 53% 83% 78%
% NH Black est.1% 1% 0% 1% 1%
ACS Pop. Est.Total 8,741 8,918 9,090 8,280 35,029
age0-19 24% 27% 31% 26% 27%
age20-60 59% 57% 56% 58% 58%
age60plus 17% 16% 13% 16% 15%
immigrants 14% 17% 27% 12% 18%
naturalized 55% 60% 30% 60% 47%
english 78% 76% 50% 84% 72%
spanish 14% 13% 44% 8% 20%
asian-lang 3% 5% 3% 3% 3%
other lang 4% 7% 3% 6% 5%
Language Fluency Speaks Eng. "Less
than Very Well"7% 10% 22% 6% 12%
hs-grad 48% 54% 51% 48% 50%
bachelor 30% 26% 15% 30% 25%
graduatedegree 14% 10% 6% 18% 12%
Child in Household child-under18 36% 35% 42% 39% 38%
Pct of Pop. Age 16+ employed 64% 65% 64% 68% 65%
income 0-25k 5% 6% 13% 5% 7%
income 25-50k 12% 11% 20% 8% 13%
income 50-75k 10% 16% 20% 12% 15%
income 75-200k 51% 55% 42% 56% 51%
income 200k-plus 22% 12% 5% 20% 15%
single family 87% 95% 64% 98% 86%
multi-family 13% 5% 36% 2% 14%
rented 21% 20% 53% 13% 27%
owned 79% 80% 47% 87% 73%
Total population data from the 2010 Decennial Census.
Surname-based Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database.
Latino voter registration and turnout data are Spanish-surname counts adjusted using Census Population Department
undercount estimates. NH White and NH Black registration and turnout counts estimated by NDC. Citizen Voting Age
Pop., Age, Immigration, and other demographics from the 2012-2016 American Community Survey and Special
Tabulation 5-year data.
Housing Stats
Household Income
Education (among those
age 25+)
Total Pop
City of Moorpark - Map 421a
Language spoken at home
8,605
Immigration
Citizen Voting Age Pop
Age
Voter Registration (Nov
2016)
Voter Turnout (Nov
2016)
Voter Turnout (Nov
2014)
42
3421Oak ParkVilla delArroyoMobile Hm PkMoorparkCommunityColgCollege ViewParkCampusCanyon ParkCampus ParkVirginiaColony ParkMoorpark PlzOld TownBusinessDistrictMoorparkVillage CtrMonte VistaNature ParkPeach HillParkCommunityPlaygroundMoorparkTown CtrVlg Retail &Auto ShopsArroyo VistaCommunityParkMountainMeadows CityParkGlenwoodParkCountryTrail ParkGabbert Canyon ChnnlN 2 Canyon Fire RdCampus RdGraduate CirSwift PlAlumni WayBraun CtSeitz CtDoris CtMoorpark CollE Los Angeles AveCampus Park DrP e c a n A v e
Reedley StVarsity StLuther CirMarquette CirQueens CtN C r e i g h t o n S t
N Amherst StLaf aye tte St
N A u b u r n C i r
N Westwood StN Fordham StNogales AveWhite Sage DrH ig h P tE lk R un L oopE l k s R u n W a y Elkton CtSimmons Way
Bear Fence CtBlue Ridge WayFishers CtSpring RdSarazen DrChampionship DrBreezy Glen DrWaterworks RdValley RdPrinceton AveCharles StFitch AveScience DrSouthfork RdMiller PkwyFlinn AveWicks RdEverett StFlory Ave2nd StSusan AveRoberts AveEsther AveSherman AveWestcott CtTorridon CtMoorpark Ave Tierra Rejada RdC rabapple C tShawnee StB rennan R dC offeetree L n
P e rs im m o n S tOlive StDakota Dr
M a ya C irStagecoach TrlPeach Hill RdBear Valley RdMcbeth CtRobinwood LnHatfield CtDonnybrook LnBella Vista DrBodega PlFireside Ln
N Vistapark DrHoneybee StE Cedarpine LnCanyonwood CtSleepy Wind StView Mesa StCamden CtZaharias CtLi t t l e r Ct
Snead Dr Casey RdPoindexter AveReyes StPark LnFuji StTech Cir
Darlene LnE n d e a v o u r C t
Shasta Ave
Kazuko Ct
Maureen LnB e lt r a m o R a n c h R d
Haynie CtAspen Hills DrGrimes Canyon RdJacobson PlHogan StGabbert Rd Elwin LnN Commerce Ave
T ie rra R e ja d a R d
Avedon RdN Buttercreek Rd
T urfw ay Rd N Terracemeadow CtWilliams Ranch RdWestport StM istygrove StArbor Hill StMountain Trail StWi llow springsBubbling Brook StAlderbrook StHavencrest StAscoli CtCl earw oo d R d
P in edale R dMeadow St
Heather Glen Ct
Tim be rda le R d
W e s td al e R d T im b er V ie w C tLaurelview D rM a n o r v i e w C t
Broadview DrHavenridge CtD a l a w a y D r2311811811823
Seabiscuit PlAffirmed PlCity of Moorpark 2018 DistrictingNational Demographics Corporation, January 29, 2019Proposed Election Sequencing:2020: Districts 2 and 32022: Districts 1 and 4Map 422aMap layers422aCensus BlockLandmark AreaPipeline/Power LineRailroadRiverStreetsWater Area43
District 1 2 3 4 Total
Ideal Total Pop 8,672 8,958 8,107 8,684 34,421
Deviation from ideal 67 353 -498 79 851
% Deviation 0.78% 4.10% -5.79% 0.92% 9.89%
% Hisp 15% 27% 70% 16% 31%
% NH White 69% 60% 24% 73% 57%
% NH Black 2% 2% 2% 2% 2%
% Asian-American 12% 10% 4% 8% 8%
Total 6,474 6,364 4,311 6,328 23,476
% Hisp 11% 17% 51% 15% 21%
% NH White 77% 68% 45% 75% 68%
% NH Black 0% 3% 1% 2% 2%
% Asian/Pac.Isl.11% 10% 2% 7% 8%
Total 5,578 5,962 3,147 5,885 20,573
% Latino est.32% 35% 49% 32% 35%
% Spanish-Surnamed 5% 4% 3% 4% 4%
% Asian-Surnamed 42% 37% 23% 43% 38%
% Filipino-Surnamed 21% 22% 23% 20% 22%
% NH White est.5% 6% 5% 5% 5%
% NH Black 13% 20% 53% 14% 22%
Total 4,713 4,935 2,352 5,055 17,056
% Latino est.33% 36% 51% 32% 36%
% Spanish-Surnamed 5% 4% 3% 4% 4%
% Asian-Surnamed 43% 38% 23% 45% 40%
% Filipino-Surnamed 19% 20% 21% 19% 20%
% NH White est.5% 5% 4% 5% 5%
% NH Black 13% 20% 51% 14% 20%
Total 2,904 2,367 1,073 3,052 9,397
% Latino est.12% 14% 44% 11% 16%
% Spanish-Surnamed 11% 12% 40% 10% 14%
% Asian-Surnamed 5% 3% 4% 3% 4%
% Filipino-Surnamed 1% 1% 1% 1% 1%
% NH White est.81% 81% 48% 82% 78%
% NH Black est.1% 1% 0% 1% 1%
ACS Pop. Est.Total 8,847 9,150 8,196 8,836 35,029
age0-19 25% 27% 31% 26% 27%
age20-60 58% 57% 57% 58% 58%
age60plus 17% 16% 12% 16% 15%
immigrants 15% 17% 28% 13% 18%
naturalized 59% 60% 27% 58% 47%
english 78% 76% 47% 83% 72%
spanish 13% 13% 48% 9% 20%
asian-lang 4% 5% 2% 3% 3%
other lang 5% 7% 2% 6% 5%
Language Fluency Speaks Eng. "Less
than Very Well"7% 10% 24% 6% 12%
hs-grad 46% 54% 52% 49% 50%
bachelor 32% 26% 13% 29% 25%
graduatedegree 15% 10% 5% 17% 12%
Child in Household child-under18 36% 35% 43% 38% 38%
Pct of Pop. Age 16+ employed 65% 65% 63% 67% 65%
income 0-25k 5% 6% 13% 5% 7%
income 25-50k 10% 11% 23% 9% 13%
income 50-75k 10% 16% 21% 13% 15%
income 75-200k 52% 55% 39% 54% 51%
income 200k-plus 23% 12% 3% 19% 15%
single family 91% 95% 59% 95% 86%
multi-family 9% 5% 41% 5% 14%
rented 17% 20% 59% 17% 27%
owned 83% 80% 41% 83% 73%
Total population data from the 2010 Decennial Census.
Surname-based Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database.
Latino voter registration and turnout data are Spanish-surname counts adjusted using Census Population Department
undercount estimates. NH White and NH Black registration and turnout counts estimated by NDC. Citizen Voting Age
Pop., Age, Immigration, and other demographics from the 2012-2016 American Community Survey and Special
Tabulation 5-year data.
Housing Stats
Household Income
Education (among those
age 25+)
Total Pop
City of Moorpark - Map 422a
Language spoken at home
8,605
Immigration
Citizen Voting Age Pop
Age
Voter Registration (Nov
2016)
Voter Turnout (Nov
2016)
Voter Turnout (Nov
2014)
44
3421Oak ParkVilla delArroyoMobile Hm PkMoorparkCommunityColgCollege ViewParkCampus ParkVirginiaColony ParkMoorpark PlzMoorparkVillage CtrMonte VistaNature ParkPeach HillParkCommunityPlaygroundMoorparkTown CtrChaparral JrHSVlg Retail &Auto ShopsArroyo VistaCommunityParkMountainMeadows CityParkGlenwoodParkCountryTrail ParkGabbert Canyon ChnnlN 2 Canyon Fire RdCampus RdGraduate CirSwift PlAlumni WayBraun CtSeitz CtCollins DrMoorpark CollE Los Angeles AveCampus Park DrBittner PlSosna CtMonroe AveReedley StMarquette StVarsity StLuther CirMarquette CirQueens CtN Pepperdine CirN Amherst StLa fa y e t te S t
N A u b u r n C i r
N Westwood StN Fordham StNogales AveWhite Sage DrH ig h P tE lk R un LoopE l ks R u n W a y Elkton CtSimmons Way
Black Rock CirShenandoah WayFishers CtSpring RdSarazen DrChampionship DrBreezy Glen DrWaterworks RdValley RdPrinceton AveCharles StFitch AveScience DrSouthfork RdMiller PkwyFlinn AveWicks RdE High StBard St
Everett StFlory Ave2nd StRoberts AveEsther AveSherman AveWestcott CtTorridon CtMoorpark AveTierra Rejada RdCr abapple C tScholartree C tBrennan RdM oorpark RdC offeetree L n
P e rs im m o n S tOlive StDak o ta Dr
M a ya C irH o p i C t
Stagecoach TrlPeach Hill RdBear Valley RdMcbeth CtRobinwood LnHatfield CtDonnybrook LnChristian Barrett DrBella Vista DrKnotty Pine StE Annette StBlairwood DrWintergreen LnWilliams Ranch RdThomasville CtZaharias Ct
Lit tle r Ct
Snead Dr Casey RdPoindexter AvePark LnLa Palma CtDarlene LnE n d e a v o u r C t
Whitney Ave
Shasta AveGoldman Ave
Maureen LnBeltramo Ranch Rd
Haynie CtAspen Hills DrGrimes Canyon RdJacobson PlRawls RdVare CtGabbert Rd
Trevino DrElwin LnN Commerce Ave
T ie rra R e ja d a R d
Avedon RdN Buttercreek Rd
T urfw ay R dInglewood AveWalnut Creek RdSilver Creek StCliffrose AveM istygrove StArbor Hill StW illow sprin gsBubbling Brook StAlderbrook StHavencrest StAscoli CtC learw ood R d
Pi n edale R dMeadow St
Heather Glen Ct
T im b e rd a le R d
W e std a le R d T im be r V ie w C tLaurelview D rM a n o r v i e w C t
Broadview DrHavenridge Ct2311811811823Seabiscuit PlVia Rey LunaCity of Moorpark 2018 DistrictingNational Demographics Corporation, January 29, 2019Proposed Election Sequencing:2020: District 2 and either 1 or 42022: District 3 and either 1 or 4Map 423aMap layers423Census BlockLandmark AreaPipeline/Power LineRailroadRiverStreetsWater Area45
District 1 2 3 4 Total
Ideal Total Pop 8,595 8,558 8,677 8,591 34,421
Deviation from ideal -10 -47 72 -14 119
% Deviation -0.12% -0.55% 0.84% -0.16% 1.38%
% Hisp 17% 28% 66% 15% 31%
% NH White 69% 59% 27% 73% 57%
% NH Black 2% 2% 2% 2% 2%
% Asian-American 10% 10% 4% 9% 8%
Total 6,384 6,076 4,706 6,310 23,476
% Hisp 13% 18% 47% 14% 21%
% NH White 76% 68% 48% 75% 68%
% NH Black 0% 3% 1% 2% 2%
% Asian/Pac.Isl.9% 10% 4% 9% 8%
Total 5,592 5,721 3,573 5,686 20,573
% Latino est.33% 35% 47% 31% 35%
% Spanish-Surnamed 5% 4% 4% 4% 4%
% Asian-Surnamed 41% 37% 25% 44% 38%
% Filipino-Surnamed 21% 22% 23% 20% 22%
% NH White est.5% 6% 5% 5% 5%
% NH Black 14% 21% 49% 12% 22%
Total 4,723 4,719 2,708 4,906 17,056
% Latino est.34% 36% 49% 31% 36%
% Spanish-Surnamed 4% 4% 4% 4% 4%
% Asian-Surnamed 42% 38% 26% 45% 40%
% Filipino-Surnamed 19% 21% 21% 19% 20%
% NH White est.5% 5% 4% 5% 5%
% NH Black 14% 21% 47% 12% 20%
Total 2,860 2,221 1,252 3,064 9,397
% Latino est.12% 15% 41% 10% 16%
% Spanish-Surnamed 11% 13% 37% 9% 14%
% Asian-Surnamed 5% 3% 4% 3% 4%
% Filipino-Surnamed 1% 1% 1% 1% 1%
% NH White est.82% 80% 52% 83% 78%
% NH Black est.1% 1% 0% 1% 1%
ACS Pop. Est.Total 8,777 8,747 8,772 8,734 35,029
age0-19 24% 27% 31% 27% 27%
age20-60 59% 58% 56% 58% 58%
age60plus 17% 16% 13% 16% 15%
immigrants 14% 16% 28% 14% 18%
naturalized 55% 60% 29% 60% 47%
english 80% 76% 49% 82% 72%
spanish 14% 13% 45% 9% 20%
asian-lang 3% 5% 3% 3% 3%
other lang 4% 6% 3% 7% 5%
Language Fluency Speaks Eng. "Less
than Very Well"7% 10% 23% 7% 12%
hs-grad 48% 54% 51% 47% 50%
bachelor 30% 26% 15% 30% 25%
graduatedegree 14% 9% 6% 18% 12%
Child in Household child-under18 36% 34% 42% 38% 38%
Pct of Pop. Age 16+ employed 65% 65% 63% 67% 65%
income 0-25k 5% 6% 13% 5% 7%
income 25-50k 12% 12% 21% 7% 13%
income 50-75k 10% 16% 20% 13% 15%
income 75-200k 52% 55% 41% 55% 51%
income 200k-plus 22% 11% 5% 20% 15%
single family 87% 95% 63% 98% 86%
multi-family 13% 5% 37% 2% 14%
rented 20% 21% 54% 14% 27%
owned 80% 79% 46% 86% 73%
Total population data from the 2010 Decennial Census.
Surname-based Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database.
Latino voter registration and turnout data are Spanish-surname counts adjusted using Census Population Department
undercount estimates. NH White and NH Black registration and turnout counts estimated by NDC. Citizen Voting Age
Pop., Age, Immigration, and other demographics from the 2012-2016 American Community Survey and Special
Tabulation 5-year data.
Housing Stats
Household Income
Education (among those
age 25+)
Total Pop
City of Moorpark - Map 423a
Language spoken at home
8,605
Immigration
Citizen Voting Age Pop
Age
Voter Registration (Nov
2016)
Voter Turnout (Nov
2016)
Voter Turnout (Nov
2014)
46
1243Oak ParkVilla delArroyoMobile Hm PkMoorparkCommunityColgCollege ViewParkCampusCanyon ParkCampus ParkVirginiaColony ParkMoorpark PlzOld TownBusinessDistrictMoorparkVillage CtrPeach HillParkCommunityPlaygroundMoorparkTown CtrChaparral JrHSVlg Retail &Auto ShopsArroyo VistaCommunityParkMountainMeadows CityParkGlenwoodParkCountryTrail ParkGabbert Canyon ChnnlN 2 Canyon Fire RdCampus RdGraduate CirSwift PlAlumni WayBraun CtSeitz CtDoris CtMoorpark CollE Los Angeles AveCampus Park DrP e c a n A v e
Alyssas CtBambi CtVarsity StLuther CirMarquette CirReedley StQueens CtN C r e i g h t o n S t
N Amherst StLaf aye tte St
N A u b u r n C i r
N Westwood StN Fordham StNogales AveWhite Sage DrH ig h P tE lk R un L oopE l k s R u n W a y Elkton CtSimmons Way
Bear Fence CtBlue Ridge WayFishers CtSpring RdSarazen DrChampionship DrBreezy Glen DrWaterworks RdValley RdPrinceton AveCharles StFitch AveScience DrSouthfork RdMiller PkwyFlinn AveWicks RdEverett StFlory Ave2nd StSusan AveRoberts AveEsther AveSherman AveWestcott CtTorridon CtMoorpark Ave Tierra Rejada RdC rabapple C tShawnee StB rennan R dC offeetree L n
P e rs im m o n S tOlive StDakota Dr
M a ya C irStagecoach TrlPeach Hill RdMcbeth CtHilburn CtChristian Barrett DrShady Knoll CtAdonis PlVista Del Valle Dr
Bella Vista Dr
Fireside Ln
N Millerton RdN Vistapark DrC l a v e l e A v e Greenbush LnBlairwood DrSunnyslope PlSleepy Wind StCamden CtZaharias CtLi t t l e r Ct
Snead Dr Casey RdPoindexter AvePark LnLa Palma CtDarlene LnE n d e a v o u r C t
Whitney Ave
Kazuko Ct
Maureen LnB e lt r a m o R a n c h R d
Haynie CtAspen Hills DrGrimes Canyon RdJacobson PlHogan StGabbert Rd Elwin LnN Commerce Ave
T ie rra R e ja d a R d
Avedon RdN Buttercreek Rd
T urfw ay Rd N Terracemeadow CtNw Cloverdale StMisty Grove StWestmont DrSpring Creek CtArbor Hill StMountain Trail StWi llow springsAldergrove StArborhill StAlderbrook St
M i r a b e l l o S t
Northdale DrPinedale RdSagewood DrMeadow St
Heather Glen Ct
R evel lo S t
T im b er V ie w C tM a n o r v i e w C t
Broadview DrHavenridge CtD a l a w a y D r2311811811823
Seabiscuit PlAffirmed PlCity of Moorpark 2018 DistrictingNational Demographics Corporation, January 16, 2019Proposed Election Sequencing:2020: District 3 and one of 1, 2 or 42022: two of 1, 2 or 4Map 424Map layers424Census BlockLandmark AreaPipeline/Power LineRailroadRiverStreetsWater Area47
District 1 2 3 4 Total
Ideal Total Pop 8,692 8,416 8,664 8,649 34,421
Deviation from ideal 87 -189 59 44 276
% Deviation 1.01% -2.20% 0.69% 0.51% 3.21%
% Hisp 13% 21% 60% 31% 31%
% NH White 74% 66% 32% 57% 57%
% NH Black 2% 2% 2% 2% 2%
% Asian-American 10% 9% 5% 9% 8%
Total 6,635 5,813 4,920 6,108 23,476
% Hisp 11% 15% 46% 19% 21%
% NH White 79% 72% 49% 68% 68%
% NH Black 0% 3% 1% 3% 2%
% Asian/Pac.Isl.9% 10% 3% 10% 8%
Total 5,936 5,477 3,402 5,757 20,573
% Latino est.32% 33% 46% 35% 35%
% Spanish-Surnamed 5% 4% 4% 4% 4%
% Asian-Surnamed 43% 41% 27% 37% 38%
% Filipino-Surnamed 21% 21% 23% 22% 22%
% NH White est.5% 5% 5% 6% 5%
% NH Black 11% 18% 46% 22% 22%
Total 5,076 4,627 2,621 4,732 17,056
% Latino est.33% 33% 47% 36% 36%
% Spanish-Surnamed 4% 4% 4% 4% 4%
% Asian-Surnamed 44% 43% 28% 38% 40%
% Filipino-Surnamed 19% 19% 20% 21% 20%
% NH White est.5% 4% 4% 6% 5%
% NH Black 10% 17% 44% 22% 20%
Total 3,018 2,574 1,616 2,188 9,397
% Latino est.8% 10% 38% 16% 16%
% Spanish-Surnamed 7% 9% 34% 14% 14%
% Asian-Surnamed 4% 3% 4% 3% 4%
% Filipino-Surnamed 1% 1% 1% 1% 1%
% NH White est.84% 84% 55% 78% 78%
% NH Black est.0% 1% 1% 1% 1%
ACS Pop. Est.Total 8,836 8,528 8,827 8,838 35,029
age0-19 24% 28% 30% 27% 27%
age20-60 60% 57% 56% 57% 58%
age60plus 17% 15% 14% 16% 15%
immigrants 10% 20% 25% 16% 18%
naturalized 59% 51% 31% 60% 47%
english 85% 72% 54% 76% 72%
spanish 8% 18% 42% 13% 20%
asian-lang 4% 3% 2% 5% 3%
other lang 3% 8% 3% 6% 5%
Language Fluency Speaks Eng. "Less
than Very Well"4% 13% 20% 10% 12%
hs-grad 48% 46% 53% 54% 50%
bachelor 31% 28% 15% 26% 25%
graduatedegree 17% 14% 7% 9% 12%
Child in Household child-under18 37% 39% 41% 35% 38%
Pct of Pop. Age 16+ employed 68% 66% 61% 65% 65%
income 0-25k 3% 8% 12% 6% 7%
income 25-50k 9% 10% 22% 11% 13%
income 50-75k 8% 16% 19% 16% 15%
income 75-200k 61% 50% 36% 55% 51%
income 200k-plus 19% 17% 11% 11% 15%
single family 92% 94% 61% 95% 86%
multi-family 8% 6% 39% 5% 14%
rented 15% 21% 54% 20% 27%
owned 85% 79% 46% 80% 73%
Total population data from the 2010 Decennial Census.
Surname-based Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database.
Latino voter registration and turnout data are Spanish-surname counts adjusted using Census Population Department
undercount estimates. NH White and NH Black registration and turnout counts estimated by NDC. Citizen Voting Age
Pop., Age, Immigration, and other demographics from the 2012-2016 American Community Survey and Special Tabulation
5-year data.
Housing Stats
Household Income
Education (among those
age 25+)
Total Pop
City of Moorpark - Map 424
Language spoken at home
8,605
Immigration
Citizen Voting Age Pop
Age
Voter Registration (Nov
2016)
Voter Turnout (Nov
2016)
Voter Turnout (Nov
2014)
48
1243Oak ParkVilla delArroyoMobile Hm PkMoorparkCommunityColgCollege ViewParkCampusCanyon ParkCampus ParkVirginiaColony ParkMoorpark PlzOld TownBusinessDistrictMoorparkVillage CtrMonte VistaNature ParkPeach HillParkCommunityPlaygroundMoorparkTown CtrChaparral JrHSVlg Retail &Auto ShopsArroyo VistaCommunityParkMountainMeadows CityParkGlenwoodParkCountryTrail ParkGabbert Canyon ChnnlN 2 Canyon Fire RdCampus RdGraduate CirSwift PlAlumni WayBraun CtSeitz CtDoris CtMoorpark CollE Los Angeles AveCampus Park DrP e c a n A v e
Reedley StVarsity StLuther CirMarquette CirQueens CtN C r e i g h t o n S t
N Amherst StLaf aye tte St
N A u b u r n C i r
N Westwood StN Fordham StNogales AveWhite Sage DrH ig h P tE lk R un L oopE l k s R u n W a y Elkton CtSimmons Way
Bear Fence CtBlue Ridge WayFishers CtSpring RdSarazen DrChampionship DrBreezy Glen DrWaterworks RdValley RdPrinceton AveCharles StFitch AveScience DrSouthfork RdMiller PkwyFlinn AveWicks RdEverett StFlory Ave2nd StSusan AveRoberts AveEsther AveSherman AveWestcott CtTorridon CtMoorpark Ave Tierra Rejada RdC rabapple C tShawnee StB rennan R dC offeetree L n
P e rs im m o n S tOlive StDakota Dr
M a ya C irStagecoach TrlPeach Hill RdMcbeth CtN Cedarpine LnRobinwood LnHatfield CtBella Vista DrBodega PlFireside Ln
N Vistapark DrHoneybee StTrailcrest DrHidden Pine CtWilliams Ranch RdSleepy Wind StView Mesa StCamden CtZaharias CtLi t t l e r Ct
Snead Dr Casey RdPoindexter AvePark LnLa Palma CtDarlene LnE n d e a v o u r C t
Whitney Ave
Kazuko Ct
Maureen LnB e lt r a m o R a n c h R d
Haynie CtAspen Hills DrGrimes Canyon RdJacobson PlHogan StGabbert Rd Elwin LnN Commerce Ave
T ie rra R e ja d a R d
Avedon RdN Buttercreek Rd
T urfw ay Rd N Terracemeadow CtSilver Creek StWestport StM istygrove StArbor Hill StMountain Trail StWi llow springsBubbling Brook StAlderbrook StHavencrest StAscoli CtNorthdale DrPinedale RdSagewood DrMeadow St
Heather Glen Ct
T im b er V ie w C tM a n o r v i e w C t
Broadview DrHavenridge CtD a l a w a y D r2311811811823
Seabiscuit PlAffirmed PlCity of Moorpark 2018 DistrictingNational Demographics Corporation, January 27, 2019Proposed Election Sequencing:2020: District 4 and one of 1, 2 or 32022: two of 1, 2 or 3Map 425Map layers425Census BlockLandmark AreaPipeline/Power LineRailroadRiverStreetsWater Area49
District 1 2 3 4 Total
Ideal Total Pop 8,692 8,986 8,594 8,149 34,421
Deviation from ideal 87 381 -11 -456 837
% Deviation 1.01% 4.43% -0.13% -5.30% 9.73%
% Hisp 13% 21% 57% 35% 31%
% NH White 74% 66% 34% 53% 57%
% NH Black 2% 2% 1% 2% 2%
% Asian-American 10% 9% 6% 8% 8%
Total 6,635 6,403 4,788 5,650 23,476
% Hisp 11% 18% 40% 21% 21%
% NH White 79% 70% 51% 67% 68%
% NH Black 0% 2% 1% 3% 2%
% Asian/Pac.Isl.9% 8% 7% 8% 8%
Total 5,936 5,282 3,891 5,463 20,573
% Latino est.32% 32% 42% 38% 35%
% Spanish-Surnamed 5% 4% 4% 4% 4%
% Asian-Surnamed 43% 42% 31% 34% 38%
% Filipino-Surnamed 21% 21% 22% 23% 22%
% NH White est.5% 5% 5% 6% 5%
% NH Black 11% 16% 38% 27% 22%
Total 5,076 4,489 3,075 4,415 17,056
% Latino est.33% 33% 43% 39% 36%
% Spanish-Surnamed 4% 4% 4% 3% 4%
% Asian-Surnamed 44% 44% 33% 35% 40%
% Filipino-Surnamed 19% 19% 20% 21% 20%
% NH White est.5% 4% 5% 6% 5%
% NH Black 10% 16% 37% 26% 20%
Total 3,018 2,851 1,714 1,813 9,397
% Latino est.8% 15% 31% 15% 16%
% Spanish-Surnamed 7% 13% 28% 14% 14%
% Asian-Surnamed 4% 4% 4% 3% 4%
% Filipino-Surnamed 1% 1% 1% 1% 1%
% NH White est.84% 80% 61% 79% 78%
% NH Black est.0% 1% 1% 1% 1%
ACS Pop. Est.Total 8,836 9,111 8,749 8,333 35,029
age0-19 24% 27% 31% 27% 27%
age20-60 60% 57% 55% 58% 58%
age60plus 17% 16% 14% 14% 15%
immigrants 10% 17% 27% 17% 18%
naturalized 59% 56% 35% 49% 47%
english 85% 75% 53% 73% 72%
spanish 8% 15% 40% 18% 20%
asian-lang 4% 3% 3% 4% 3%
other lang 3% 7% 5% 5% 5%
Language Fluency Speaks Eng. "Less
than Very Well"4% 9% 21% 12% 12%
hs-grad 48% 50% 48% 55% 50%
bachelor 31% 28% 18% 23% 25%
graduatedegree 17% 14% 9% 7% 12%
Child in Household child-under18 37% 37% 42% 36% 38%
Pct of Pop. Age 16+ employed 68% 65% 62% 65% 65%
income 0-25k 3% 8% 11% 6% 7%
income 25-50k 9% 10% 17% 15% 13%
income 50-75k 8% 16% 18% 17% 15%
income 75-200k 61% 49% 40% 53% 51%
income 200k-plus 19% 16% 14% 9% 15%
single family 92% 87% 72% 92% 86%
multi-family 8% 13% 28% 8% 14%
rented 15% 24% 44% 26% 27%
owned 85% 76% 56% 74% 73%
Total population data from the 2010 Decennial Census.
Surname-based Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database.
Latino voter registration and turnout data are Spanish-surname counts adjusted using Census Population Department
undercount estimates. NH White and NH Black registration and turnout counts estimated by NDC. Citizen Voting Age
Pop., Age, Immigration, and other demographics from the 2012-2016 American Community Survey and Special
Tabulation 5-year data.
Housing Stats
Household Income
Education (among those
age 25+)
Total Pop
City of Moorpark - Map 425
Language spoken at home
8,605
Immigration
Citizen Voting Age Pop
Age
Voter Registration (Nov
2016)
Voter Turnout (Nov
2016)
Voter Turnout (Nov
2014)
50
Attachment 4
New Draft Maps (including Demographic and Voting Information for Draft Maps
and Summary Tables) Received Since January 23, 2019 But Not Specifically
Carried Over for Focused Review
12853-0027\2261170v11.doc 51
4321Oak ParkVilla delArroyoMobile Hm PkMoorparkCommunityColgCollege ViewParkVirginiaColony ParkMoorpark PlzOld TownBusinessDistrictMoorparkVillage CtrPeach HillParkMoorparkTown CtrChaparral JrHSVlg Retail &Auto ShopsArroyo VistaCommunityParkMountainMeadows CityParkGlenwoodParkCountryTrail ParkGabbert Canyon ChnnlN 2 Canyon Fire RdCampus RdGraduate CirSwift PlBraun CtDoris CtBe ragan S t E Los Angeles AveD e l f en S t
Thionnet PlCollins DrPecan AveBenwood DrCampus Park DrReedley StLuther CirMarquette CirPenn StN Harvard StQueens CtN C r e i g h t o n S t
Cornell CirPrinceton Ave
L afayette St
N A u b u r n C i r
N Westwood StCollege H eights DrNogales AveWhite Sage DrH ig h P tE lk R un LoopE l k s R u n W a y Elkton CtBlack Rock CirShenandoah WayFishers CtSpring RdSarazen DrChampionship DrBreezy Glen DrWaterworks RdValley RdH e d y la nd C tFitch AveScience DrSouthfork RdFlinn AveWicks RdBonnie View RdWalnut St2nd StSusan AveRoberts AveEsther AveSherman Ave3rd StMillard StTorridon CtMoorpark AveTierra Rejada RdC rabapple C tShawnee StBrennan R dC offeetree L n
P e rs imm o n S tM iller P k wy Dakota Dr
M a y a C irStagecoach TrlPeach Hill RdBear Valley RdVista Del Valle DrDonnybrook LnAshbrook LnBella Vista Dr
N Millerton RdN Ashtree StBlairwood DrSunnyslope PlChristian Barrett DrSleepy Wind StZaharias CtL it tle r Ct
Snead DrCasey RdPoindexter AveGisler RdVilla Campesina AveDarlene LnE n d e a v o u r C t
Whitney Ave
Kazuko Ct
Maureen LnHaynie CtAspen Hills DrGrimes Canyon RdJacobson PlHogan StGabbert Rd Elwin LnN Commerce Ave
Courtney LnHarvester StAvedon RdN Buttercreek Rd
Tu rfw ay R dCe darmeadow CtCliffrose Ave
Walnut Creek RdMountain Trail StLondon Grove CtAlderbrook StA r b o r h i ll S t
Havencrest StTorino StEmilio CtCountrywood DrBrookwood DrMeadow St
Heather Glen Ct
Gentlewood DrT im b e r V ie w C tBroadview DrHavenridge Ct23118118Seabiscuit PlAffirmed PlCity of Moorpark 2018 DistrictingNational Demographics Corporation, January 16, 2019Proposed Election Sequencing:2020: District 2 and one of 1, 3 or 42022: two of 1, 3 or 4Map 416Not population balancedMap layers416Census BlockLandmark AreaPipeline/Power LineRailroadRiverStreetsWater Area52
District 1 2 3 4 Total
Ideal Total Pop 2,781 12,051 9,001 10,588 34,421
Deviation from ideal -5,824 3,446 396 1,983 9,270
% Deviation -67.68% 40.05% 4.60% 23.04% 107.73%
% Hisp 51% 46% 21% 18% 31%
% NH White 37% 44% 66% 70% 57%
% NH Black 1% 2% 2% 2% 2%
% Asian-American 9% 7% 9% 9% 8%
Total 1,763 7,302 6,410 8,002 23,476
% Hisp 42% 25% 18% 15% 21%
% NH White 49% 62% 70% 76% 68%
% NH Black 1% 2% 2% 0% 2%
% Asian/Pac.Isl.6% 9% 8% 8% 8%
Total 1,275 7,144 5,287 6,866 20,573
% Latino est.36% 39% 32% 34% 35%
% Spanish-Surnamed 6% 4% 4% 4% 4%
% Asian-Surnamed 38% 33% 42% 40% 38%
% Filipino-Surnamed 22% 23% 21% 21% 22%
% NH White est.5% 6% 5% 5% 5%
% NH Black 28% 30% 16% 15% 22%
Total 1,043 5,715 4,492 5,805 17,056
% Latino est.36% 40% 33% 35% 36%
% Spanish-Surnamed 5% 4% 4% 4% 4%
% Asian-Surnamed 39% 34% 44% 42% 40%
% Filipino-Surnamed 20% 21% 19% 19% 20%
% NH White est.5% 5% 4% 5% 5%
% NH Black 27% 29% 16% 15% 20%
Total 756 2,380 2,853 3,408 9,397
% Latino est.25% 20% 15% 12% 16%
% Spanish-Surnamed 22% 18% 13% 11% 14%
% Asian-Surnamed 5% 3% 4% 4% 4%
% Filipino-Surnamed 1% 1% 1% 1% 1%
% NH White est.67% 74% 80% 81% 78%
% NH Black est.2% 1% 1% 0% 1%
ACS Pop. Est.Total 2,875 12,270 9,126 10,758 35,029
age0-19 31% 29% 27% 24% 27%
age20-60 53% 57% 57% 59% 58%
age60plus 16% 13% 16% 17% 15%
immigrants 25% 22% 17% 11% 18%
naturalized 44% 40% 56% 53% 47%
english 59% 63% 75% 82% 72%
spanish 31% 28% 15% 12% 20%
asian-lang 3% 4% 3% 4% 3%
other lang 7% 5% 7% 2% 5%
Language Fluency Speaks Eng. "Less
than Very Well"18% 18% 9% 5% 12%
hs-grad 41% 51% 50% 51% 50%
bachelor 23% 21% 28% 28% 25%
graduatedegree 14% 7% 14% 15% 12%
Child in Household child-under18 44% 38% 37% 37% 38%
Pct of Pop. Age 16+ employed 57% 65% 65% 67% 65%
income 0-25k 8% 8% 8% 5% 7%
income 25-50k 14% 15% 10% 12% 13%
income 50-75k 13% 17% 16% 11% 15%
income 75-200k 33% 51% 49% 56% 51%
income 200k-plus 33% 9% 16% 16% 15%
single family 91% 89% 87% 81% 86%
multi-family 9% 11% 13% 19% 14%
rented 26% 30% 24% 26% 27%
owned 74% 70% 76% 74% 73%
Total population data from the 2010 Decennial Census.
Surname-based Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database.
Latino voter registration and turnout data are Spanish-surname counts adjusted using Census Population Department
undercount estimates. NH White and NH Black registration and turnout counts estimated by NDC. Citizen Voting Age
Pop., Age, Immigration, and other demographics from the 2012-2016 American Community Survey and Special Tabulation
5-year data.
Housing Stats
Household Income
Education (among those
age 25+)
Total Pop
City of Moorpark - Map 416
Language spoken at home
8,605
Immigration
Citizen Voting Age Pop
Age
Voter Registration (Nov
2016)
Voter Turnout (Nov
2016)
Voter Turnout (Nov
2014)
53
3412Oak ParkVilla delArroyoMobile Hm PkMoorparkCommunityColgCollege ViewParkVirginiaColony ParkMoorpark PlzOld TownBusinessDistrictMoorparkVillage CtrMonte VistaNature ParkPeach HillParkMoorparkTown CtrChaparral JrHSVlg Retail &Auto ShopsArroyo VistaCommunityParkMountainMeadows CityParkGlenwoodParkCountryTrail ParkGabbert Canyon ChnnlN 2 Canyon Fire RdCampus RdGraduate CirSwift PlBraun CtDoris CtBe ragan S t E Los Angeles AveD e l f en S t
Thionnet PlCollins DrPecan AveBenwood DrCampus Park DrReedley StVarsity StLuther CirMarquette CirN Vassar CirQueens CtCornell CirPrinceton Ave
L afayette St
N A u b u r n C i r
N Westwood StCollege H eights DrNogales AveWhite Sage DrH ig h P tE lk R un LoopE l k s R u n W a y Elkton CtBlack Rock CirShenandoah WayFishers CtSpring RdSarazen DrChampionship DrBreezy Glen DrWaterworks RdValley RdH e d y la nd C tFitch AveScience DrSouthfork RdFlinn AveWicks RdBonnie View RdWalnut St2nd StSusan AveRoberts AveEsther AveSherman Ave3rd StMillard StTorridon CtMoorpark AveTierra Rejada RdC rabapple C tShawnee StBrennan R dC offeetree L n
P e rs imm o n S tM iller P k wy Dakota Dr
M a y a C irStagecoach TrlPeach Hill RdVista Del Valle DrRolling Knoll Ln
Donnybrook LnAshbrook LnBella Vista Dr
N Millerton RdN Ashtree StBlairwood DrSunnyslope PlChristian Barrett DrSleepy Wind StZaharias CtL it tle r Ct
Snead DrCasey RdPoindexter AveGisler RdVilla Campesina AveDarlene LnE n d e a v o u r C t
Whitney Ave
Kazuko Ct
Maureen LnHaynie CtAspen Hills DrGrimes Canyon RdJacobson PlHogan StGabbert Rd Elwin LnN Commerce Ave
Courtney LnHarvester StAvedon RdN Buttercreek Rd
Tu rfw ay R dCe darmeadow CtCliffrose Ave
Walnut Creek RdMountain Trail StLondon Grove CtAlderbrook StA r b o r h i ll S t
Havencrest StTorino StEmilio CtCountrywood DrBrookwood DrMeadow St
Heather Glen Ct
Gentlewood DrT im b e r V ie w C tBroadview DrHavenridge Ct23118118Seabiscuit PlAffirmed PlCity of Moorpark 2018 DistrictingNational Demographics Corporation, January 16, 2019Proposed Election Sequencing:2020: District 1 and one of 2, 3 or 42022: two of 2, 3 or 4Map 417Not population balancedMap layers417Census BlockLandmark AreaPipeline/Power LineRailroadRiverStreetsWater Area54
District 1 2 3 4 Total
Ideal Total Pop 6,183 8,664 8,986 10,588 34,421
Deviation from ideal -2,422 59 381 1,983 4,405
% Deviation -28.15% 0.69% 4.43% 23.04% 51.19%
% Hisp 70% 31% 21% 18% 31%
% NH White 23% 57% 66% 70% 57%
% NH Black 1% 2% 2% 2% 2%
% Asian-American 5% 9% 9% 9% 8%
Total 2,956 6,116 6,403 8,002 23,476
% Hisp 49% 19% 18% 15% 21%
% NH White 43% 68% 70% 76% 68%
% NH Black 1% 3% 2% 0% 2%
% Asian/Pac.Isl.5% 10% 8% 8% 8%
Total 2,662 5,762 5,282 6,866 20,573
% Latino est.46% 35% 32% 34% 35%
% Spanish-Surnamed 4% 4% 4% 4% 4%
% Asian-Surnamed 27% 37% 42% 40% 38%
% Filipino-Surnamed 23% 22% 21% 21% 22%
% NH White est.5% 6% 5% 5% 5%
% NH Black 46% 22% 16% 15% 22%
Total 2,027 4,735 4,489 5,805 17,056
% Latino est.47% 36% 33% 35% 36%
% Spanish-Surnamed 4% 4% 4% 4% 4%
% Asian-Surnamed 28% 38% 44% 42% 40%
% Filipino-Surnamed 21% 21% 19% 19% 20%
% NH White est.4% 6% 4% 5% 5%
% NH Black 44% 22% 16% 15% 20%
Total 948 2,190 2,851 3,408 9,397
% Latino est.32% 16% 15% 12% 16%
% Spanish-Surnamed 29% 14% 13% 11% 14%
% Asian-Surnamed 5% 3% 4% 4% 4%
% Filipino-Surnamed 1% 1% 1% 1% 1%
% NH White est.58% 78% 80% 81% 78%
% NH Black est.1% 1% 1% 0% 1%
ACS Pop. Est.Total 6,307 8,854 9,111 10,758 35,029
age0-19 34% 27% 27% 24% 27%
age20-60 55% 57% 57% 59% 58%
age60plus 12% 16% 16% 17% 15%
immigrants 32% 16% 17% 11% 18%
naturalized 27% 60% 56% 53% 47%
english 42% 76% 75% 82% 72%
spanish 52% 13% 15% 12% 20%
asian-lang 2% 5% 3% 4% 3%
other lang 3% 6% 7% 2% 5%
Language Fluency Speaks Eng. "Less
than Very Well"29% 10% 9% 5% 12%
hs-grad 42% 54% 50% 51% 50%
bachelor 14% 26% 28% 28% 25%
graduatedegree 7% 9% 14% 15% 12%
Child in Household child-under18 48% 35% 37% 37% 38%
Pct of Pop. Age 16+ employed 61% 65% 65% 67% 65%
income 0-25k 11% 6% 8% 5% 7%
income 25-50k 22% 11% 10% 12% 13%
income 50-75k 17% 16% 16% 11% 15%
income 75-200k 34% 55% 49% 56% 51%
income 200k-plus 16% 11% 16% 16% 15%
single family 80% 95% 87% 81% 86%
multi-family 20% 5% 13% 19% 14%
rented 47% 20% 24% 26% 27%
owned 53% 80% 76% 74% 73%
Total population data from the 2010 Decennial Census.
Surname-based Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database.
Latino voter registration and turnout data are Spanish-surname counts adjusted using Census Population Department
undercount estimates. NH White and NH Black registration and turnout counts estimated by NDC. Citizen Voting Age
Pop., Age, Immigration, and other demographics from the 2012-2016 American Community Survey and Special Tabulation
5-year data.
Housing Stats
Household Income
Education (among those
age 25+)
Total Pop
City of Moorpark - Map 417
Language spoken at home
8,605
Immigration
Citizen Voting Age Pop
Age
Voter Registration (Nov
2016)
Voter Turnout (Nov
2016)
Voter Turnout (Nov
2014)
55
2341119262520331546681638172327430534340322147452418442235228133629123739107111431429414843Oak ParkMoorparkCommunityColgVilla delArroyoMobile Hm PkCollege ViewParkVirginiaColony ParkMoorpark PlzMoorparkVillage CtrPeach HillParkCommunityPlaygroundMoorparkTown CtrChaparral JrHSVlg Retail &Auto ShopsArroyo VistaCommunityParkTerra RejadaParkGlenwoodParkCountryTrail ParkGabbert Canyon ChnnlN 2 Canyon Fire RdCampus RdE Los Angeles AveGraduate CirSwift PlAlumni WayBraun CtSeitz CtDoris CtMoorpark CollCampus Park DrCollins DrCampus Canyon DrPecan AveBambi CtReedley StMarquette StLuther CirMarquette CirPenn StN Vassar CirQueens CtN Amherst StN A u b u r n C i r
N W e s tw o o d S tN Fordham StCollege Heights DrPrinceton AveNew Los Angeles AveH ig h P tE lk R un LoopElkton CtSwift Run CtSpring RdSarazen DrChampionship DrBreezy Glen DrWaterworks RdValley RdH e d y la n d C tFitch AveScience DrSouthfork RdMiller PkwyFlinn AveWicks RdCharles StBonnie View RdBard St
1st St2nd StEsther AveSherman AveMillard StMajestic CtMoorpark AveTierra Rejada RdC rabapple C tScholartree C tB rennan R dM oorpark RdC o ffeetree L n
P e rs im m o n S tOlive StDakota Dr
H o p i C t
S p r i n g R d
Mill Valley RdVista Del Valle DrGunsmoke RdWillow Creek LnW e e p i n g W i l l o w D r
N Millerton RdTrailcrest DrSunnyslope PlWilliams Ranch RdWestport StZaharias CtLi t t l e r Ct
Snead Dr Casey RdPoindexter AveLa Palma CtDarlene LnE n d e a v o u r C t
Whitney Ave
Kazuko Ct
Maureen LnBeltramo Ranch Rd
Haynie CtAspen Hills DrGrimes Canyon RdJacobson PlHogan StGabbert Rd
Trevino DrElwin LnN Commerce Ave
Talmadge RdHollyglen CtWildflower CtWillowood CtT urfw ay R dN Terracemeadow CtW alnut Creek RdStoneyglen CtCrystal Ranch RdMistygrove StArbor Hill StAlderbrook StHavencrest StEmilio CtCountrywood DrBrookwood DrMeadow StGentlewood DrTorino StFlowerwood CtM a n o r v i e w C t
Broadview DrHavenridge CtD a l a w a y D r2311811811823
Seabiscuit PlCity of Moorpark 2018 DistrictingNational Demographics Corporation, January 29, 2019Proposed Election Sequencing:2020: any two districts2022: any two districtsMap 426Not contiguousMap layers426Landmark AreaPipeline/Power LineRailroadRiverStreetsWater AreaPopUnits56
District 1 2 3 4 Total
Ideal Total Pop 8,651 8,557 8,549 8,664 34,421
Deviation from ideal 46 -48 -56 59 115
% Deviation 0.53% -0.56% -0.65% 0.69% 1.34%
% Hisp 32% 33% 30% 31% 31%
% NH White 57% 57% 57% 57% 57%
% NH Black 1% 2% 2% 2% 2%
% Asian-American 8% 7% 9% 9% 8%
Total 5,706 5,986 5,669 6,116 23,476
% Hisp 23% 21% 22% 19% 21%
% NH White 68% 70% 66% 68% 68%
% NH Black 1% 1% 3% 3% 2%
% Asian/Pac.Isl.8% 7% 8% 10% 8%
Total 5,146 4,924 4,740 5,762 20,573
% Latino est.35% 35% 36% 35% 35%
% Spanish-Surnamed 5% 4% 4% 4% 4%
% Asian-Surnamed 39% 38% 38% 37% 38%
% Filipino-Surnamed 21% 21% 21% 22% 22%
% NH White est.5% 5% 5% 6% 5%
% NH Black 21% 20% 23% 22% 22%
Total 4,288 4,106 3,927 4,735 17,056
% Latino est.36% 36% 36% 36% 36%
% Spanish-Surnamed 4% 4% 4% 4% 4%
% Asian-Surnamed 40% 40% 40% 38% 40%
% Filipino-Surnamed 19% 19% 20% 21% 20%
% NH White est.5% 5% 4% 6% 5%
% NH Black 19% 19% 21% 22% 20%
Total 2,577 2,357 2,273 2,190 9,397
% Latino est.16% 15% 16% 16% 16%
% Spanish-Surnamed 14% 13% 14% 14% 14%
% Asian-Surnamed 4% 4% 4% 3% 4%
% Filipino-Surnamed 1% 1% 1% 1% 1%
% NH White est.75% 80% 77% 78% 78%
% NH Black est.0% 0% 2% 1% 1%
ACS Pop. Est.Total 8,836 8,681 8,658 8,854 35,029
age0-19 27% 26% 28% 27% 27%
age20-60 58% 59% 56% 57% 58%
age60plus 15% 15% 15% 16% 15%
immigrants 18% 17% 21% 16% 18%
naturalized 39% 42% 48% 60% 47%
english 69% 73% 68% 76% 72%
spanish 25% 20% 22% 13% 20%
asian-lang 3% 3% 3% 5% 3%
other lang 3% 3% 7% 6% 5%
Language Fluency Speaks Eng. "Less
than Very Well"13% 11% 13% 10% 12%
hs-grad 48% 49% 50% 54% 50%
bachelor 24% 26% 25% 26% 25%
graduatedegree 13% 13% 13% 9% 12%
Child in Household child-under18 40% 38% 39% 35% 38%
Pct of Pop. Age 16+ employed 64% 67% 65% 65% 65%
income 0-25k 6% 6% 10% 6% 7%
income 25-50k 15% 13% 12% 11% 13%
income 50-75k 12% 13% 17% 16% 15%
income 75-200k 48% 53% 47% 55% 51%
income 200k-plus 19% 15% 14% 11% 15%
single family 82% 84% 83% 95% 86%
multi-family 18% 16% 17% 5% 14%
rented 30% 26% 30% 20% 27%
owned 70% 74% 70% 80% 73%
Total population data from the 2010 Decennial Census.
Surname-based Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database.
Latino voter registration and turnout data are Spanish-surname counts adjusted using Census Population Department
undercount estimates. NH White and NH Black registration and turnout counts estimated by NDC. Citizen Voting Age
Pop., Age, Immigration, and other demographics from the 2012-2016 American Community Survey and Special
Tabulation 5-year data.
Housing Stats
Household Income
Education (among those
age 25+)
Total Pop
City of Moorpark - Map 426
Language spoken at home
8,605
Immigration
Citizen Voting Age Pop
Age
Voter Registration (Nov
2016)
Voter Turnout (Nov
2016)
Voter Turnout (Nov
2014)
57
Attachment 5
Previous Draft Maps (including Demographic and Voting Information for Draft
Maps and Summary Tables) from January 23, 2019 Not Carried Over for Focused
Review
12853-0027\2261170v11.doc 58
59
District 1 2 3 4 Total
Ideal Total Pop 8,649 8,816 8,606 8,350 34,421
Deviation from ideal 44 211 1 -255 466
% Deviation 0 51% 2 45% 0 01% -2 96% 5 42%
% Hisp 31% 15% 15% 67% 31%
% NH White 57% 71% 73% 27% 57%
% NH Black 2% 2% 2% 2% 2%
% Asian-American 9% 11% 9% 4% 8%
Total 6,108 6,631 6,250 4,487 23,476
% Hisp 19% 12% 13% 50% 21%
% NH White 68% 77% 74% 46% 68%
% NH Black 3% 0% 2% 1% 2%
% Asian/Pac Isl 10% 9% 10% 3% 8%
Total 5,757 5,803 5,660 3,352 20,573
% Latino est 35% 32% 31% 50% 35%
% Spanish-Surnamed 4% 5% 5% 3% 4%
% Asian-Surnamed 37% 42% 44% 22% 38%
% Filipino-Surnamed 22% 21% 20% 23% 22%
% NH White est 6% 5% 5% 5% 5%
% NH Black 22% 12% 12% 53% 22%
Total 4,732 4,937 4,880 2,506 17,056
% Latino est 36% 33% 31% 52% 36%
% Spanish-Surnamed 4% 4% 4% 3% 4%
% Asian-Surnamed 38% 44% 46% 23% 40%
% Filipino-Surnamed 21% 19% 19% 21% 20%
% NH White est 6% 5% 5% 4% 5%
% NH Black 22% 11% 12% 52% 20%
Total 2,188 3,078 2,977 1,153 9,397
% Latino est 16% 10% 10% 45% 16%
% Spanish-Surnamed 14% 9% 9% 40% 14%
% Asian-Surnamed 3% 5% 3% 3% 4%
% Filipino-Surnamed 1% 1% 1% 1% 1%
% NH White est 78% 81% 85% 48% 78%
% NH Black est 1% 1% 1% 0% 1%
ACS Pop Est Total 8,838 9,010 8,736 8,444 35,029
age0-19 27% 24% 27% 31% 27%
age20-60 57% 59% 57% 57% 58%
age60plus 16% 17% 16% 12% 15%
immigrants 16% 12% 16% 27% 18%
naturalized 60% 58% 60% 26% 47%
english 76% 82% 79% 48% 72%
spanish 13% 11% 10% 48% 20%
asian-lang 5% 4% 3% 2% 3%
other lang 6% 4% 8% 2% 5%
Language Fluency Speaks Eng "Less
than Very Well"10% 6% 8% 23% 12%
hs-grad 54% 47% 47% 54% 50%
bachelor 26% 31% 30% 12% 25%
graduatedegree 9% 16% 17% 5% 12%
Child in Household child-under18 35% 37% 38% 42% 38%
Pct of Pop Age 16+ employed 65% 65% 67% 63% 65%
income 0-25k 6% 4% 6% 13% 7%
income 25-50k 11% 10% 7% 24% 13%
income 50-75k 16% 9% 14% 21% 15%
income 75-200k 55% 54% 54% 39% 51%
income 200k-plus 11% 23% 19% 3% 15%
single family 95% 92% 97% 57% 86%
multi-family 5% 8% 3% 43% 14%
rented 20% 16% 15% 61% 27%
owned 80% 84% 85% 39% 73%
Total population data from the 2010 Decennial Census.
Surname-based Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database.
Latino voter registration and turnout data are Spanish-surname counts adjusted using Census Population Department
undercount estimates. NH White and NH Black registration and turnout counts estimated by NDC. Citizen Voting Age
Pop., Age, Immigration, and other demographics from the 2012-2016 American Community Survey and Special
Tabulation 5-year data.
Housing Stats
Household Income
Education (among those
age 25+)
Total Pop
City of Moorpark - Map 401
Language spoken at home
8,605
Immigration
Citizen Voting Age Pop
Age
Voter Registration (Nov
2016)
Voter Turnout (Nov
2016)
Voter Turnout (Nov
2014)
60
61
District 1 2 3 4 Total
Ideal Total Pop 8,664 8,664 8,692 8,401 34,421
Deviation from ideal 59 59 87 -204 291
% Deviation 0 69% 0 69% 1 01% -2 37% 3 38%
% Hisp 31% 60% 13% 21% 31%
% NH White 57% 32% 74% 67% 57%
% NH Black 2% 2% 2% 2% 2%
% Asian-American 9% 5% 10% 9% 8%
Total 6,116 4,920 6,635 5,805 23,476
% Hisp 19% 46% 11% 15% 21%
% NH White 68% 49% 79% 72% 68%
% NH Black 3% 1% 0% 3% 2%
% Asian/Pac Isl 10% 3% 9% 10% 8%
Total 5,759 3,405 5,936 5,472 20,573
% Latino est 35% 46% 32% 33% 35%
% Spanish-Surnamed 4% 4% 5% 4% 4%
% Asian-Surnamed 37% 27% 43% 41% 38%
% Filipino-Surnamed 22% 23% 21% 21% 22%
% NH White est 6% 5% 5% 5% 5%
% NH Black 22% 46% 11% 18% 22%
Total 4,732 2,623 5,076 4,624 17,056
% Latino est 36% 47% 33% 33% 36%
% Spanish-Surnamed 4% 4% 4% 4% 4%
% Asian-Surnamed 38% 28% 44% 43% 40%
% Filipino-Surnamed 21% 20% 19% 19% 20%
% NH White est 6% 4% 5% 4% 5%
% NH Black 22% 44% 10% 17% 20%
Total 2,188 1,701 2,936 2,572 9,397
% Latino est 16% 36% 8% 10% 16%
% Spanish-Surnamed 14% 33% 7% 9% 14%
% Asian-Surnamed 3% 4% 4% 3% 4%
% Filipino-Surnamed 1% 1% 1% 1% 1%
% NH White est 78% 52% 86% 84% 78%
% NH Black est 1% 1% 0% 1% 1%
ACS Pop Est Total 8,854 8,827 8,836 8,513 35,029
age0-19 27% 30% 24% 28% 27%
age20-60 57% 56% 60% 57% 58%
age60plus 16% 14% 17% 15% 15%
immigrants 16% 25% 10% 20% 18%
naturalized 60% 31% 59% 51% 47%
english 76% 54% 85% 72% 72%
spanish 13% 42% 8% 18% 20%
asian-lang 5% 2% 4% 3% 3%
other lang 6% 3% 3% 8% 5%
Language Fluency Speaks Eng "Less
than Very Well"10% 20% 4% 13% 12%
hs-grad 54% 53% 48% 46% 50%
bachelor 26% 15% 31% 28% 25%
graduatedegree 9% 7% 17% 14% 12%
Child in Household child-under18 35% 41% 37% 39% 38%
Pct of Pop Age 16+ employed 65% 61% 68% 66% 65%
income 0-25k 6% 12% 3% 8% 7%
income 25-50k 11% 22% 9% 10% 13%
income 50-75k 16% 19% 8% 16% 15%
income 75-200k 55% 36% 61% 50% 51%
income 200k-plus 11% 11% 19% 17% 15%
single family 95% 61% 92% 93% 86%
multi-family 5% 39% 8% 7% 14%
rented 20% 54% 15% 21% 27%
owned 80% 46% 85% 79% 73%
Total population data from the 2010 Decennial Census.
Surname-based Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database.
Latino voter registration and turnout data are Spanish-surname counts adjusted using Census Population Department
undercount estimates. NH White and NH Black registration and turnout counts estimated by NDC. Citizen Voting Age
Pop., Age, Immigration, and other demographics from the 2012-2016 American Community Survey and Special
Tabulation 5-year data.
Housing Stats
Household Income
Education (among those
age 25+)
Total Pop
City of Moorpark - Map 402
Language spoken at home
8,605
Immigration
Citizen Voting Age Pop
Age
Voter Registration (Nov
2016)
Voter Turnout (Nov
2016)
Voter Turnout (Nov
2014)
62
63
District 1 2 3 4 Total
Ideal Total Pop 8,590 8,655 8,484 8,692 34,421
Deviation from ideal -15 50 -121 87 208
% Deviation -0 17% 0 58% -1 41% 1 01% 2 42%
% Hisp 28% 67% 18% 13% 31%
% NH White 58% 27% 70% 74% 57%
% NH Black 2% 2% 2% 2% 2%
% Asian-American 11% 4% 9% 10% 8%
Total 6,032 4,626 6,183 6,635 23,476
% Hisp 17% 49 5% 16% 11% 21%
% NH White 69% 46% 72% 79% 68%
% NH Black 3% 1% 2% 0% 2%
% Asian/Pac Isl 10% 3% 9% 9% 8%
Total 5,703 3,471 5,462 5,936 20,573
% Latino est 35% 49% 31% 32% 35%
% Spanish-Surnamed 5% 3% 4% 5% 4%
% Asian-Surnamed 37% 23% 43% 43% 38%
% Filipino-Surnamed 22% 23% 20% 21% 22%
% NH White est 6% 5% 5% 5% 5%
% NH Black 23% 52% 13% 11% 22%
Total 4,692 2,606 4,681 5,076 17,056
% Latino est 36% 51% 31% 33% 36%
% Spanish-Surnamed 4% 3% 4% 4% 4%
% Asian-Surnamed 38% 24% 45% 44% 40%
% Filipino-Surnamed 21% 21% 19% 19% 20%
% NH White est 5% 4% 5% 5% 5%
% NH Black 22% 51% 13% 10% 20%
Total 2,509 1,204 2,665 3,018 9,397
% Latino est 17% 44% 10% 8% 16%
% Spanish-Surnamed 15% 39% 9% 7% 14%
% Asian-Surnamed 4% 3% 3% 4% 4%
% Filipino-Surnamed 1% 1% 1% 1% 1%
% NH White est 77% 49% 84% 84% 78%
% NH Black est 1% 0% 1% 0% 1%
ACS Pop Est Total 8,827 8,752 8,614 8,836 35,029
age0-19 27% 31% 27% 24% 27%
age20-60 57% 57% 57% 60% 58%
age60plus 16% 13% 16% 17% 15%
immigrants 17% 27% 17% 10% 18%
naturalized 58% 27% 60% 59% 47%
english 75% 49% 77% 85% 72%
spanish 14% 47% 11% 8% 20%
asian-lang 4% 2% 3% 4% 3%
other lang 7% 2% 8% 3% 5%
Language Fluency Speaks Eng "Less
than Very Well"10% 23% 9% 4% 12%
hs-grad 52% 53% 48% 48% 50%
bachelor 26% 13% 30% 31% 25%
graduatedegree 11% 5% 15% 17% 12%
Child in Household child-under18 36% 42% 37% 37% 38%
Pct of Pop Age 16+ employed 63% 63% 66% 68% 65%
income 0-25k 6% 13% 7% 3% 7%
income 25-50k 12% 23% 8% 9% 13%
income 50-75k 15% 21% 15% 8% 15%
income 75-200k 50% 39% 52% 61% 51%
income 200k-plus 17% 3% 18% 19% 15%
single family 95% 58% 96% 92% 86%
multi-family 5% 42% 4% 8% 14%
rented 20% 59% 16% 15% 27%
owned 80% 41% 84% 85% 73%
Total population data from the 2010 Decennial Census.
Surname-based Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database.
Latino voter registration and turnout data are Spanish-surname counts adjusted using Census Population Department
undercount estimates. NH White and NH Black registration and turnout counts estimated by NDC. Citizen Voting Age
Pop., Age, Immigration, and other demographics from the 2012-2016 American Community Survey and Special
Tabulation 5-year data.
Housing Stats
Household Income
Education (among those
age 25+)
Total Pop
City of Moorpark - Map 407
Language spoken at home
8,605
Immigration
Citizen Voting Age Pop
Age
Voter Registration (Nov
2016)
Voter Turnout (Nov
2016)
Voter Turnout (Nov
2014)
64
65
District 1 2 3 4 Total
Ideal Total Pop 8,362 8,649 8,911 8,499 34,421
Deviation from ideal -243 44 306 -106 549
% Deviation -2 82% 0 51% 3 56% -1 23% 6 38%
% Hisp 64% 31% 14% 18% 31%
% NH White 28% 57% 73% 69% 57%
% NH Black 2% 2% 2% 2% 2%
% Asian-American 5% 9% 9% 9% 8%
Total 4,566 6,108 6,664 6,138 23,476
% Hisp 47% 19% 11% 15% 21%
% NH White 47% 68% 78% 72% 68%
% NH Black 1% 3% 0% 2% 2%
% Asian/Pac Isl 4% 10% 9% 9% 8%
Total 3,386 5,749 6,033 5,404 20,573
% Latino est 46% 35% 33% 32% 35%
% Spanish-Surnamed 4% 4% 4% 4% 4%
% Asian-Surnamed 26% 37% 42% 43% 38%
% Filipino-Surnamed 23% 22% 21% 21% 22%
% NH White est 5% 6% 5% 5% 5%
% NH Black 47% 22% 13% 15% 22%
Total 2,587 4,725 5,135 4,609 17,056
% Latino est 48% 36% 33% 32% 36%
% Spanish-Surnamed 4% 4% 4% 4% 4%
% Asian-Surnamed 27% 38% 43% 44% 40%
% Filipino-Surnamed 21% 21% 19% 19% 20%
% NH White est 4% 6% 5% 4% 5%
% NH Black 45% 22% 12% 15% 20%
Total 1,238 2,185 3,029 2,945 9,397
% Latino est 34% 16% 10% 14% 16%
% Spanish-Surnamed 31% 14% 9% 12% 14%
% Asian-Surnamed 4% 3% 4% 4% 4%
% Filipino-Surnamed 1% 1% 1% 1% 1%
% NH White est 58% 78% 83% 80% 78%
% NH Black est 1% 1% 0% 1% 1%
ACS Pop Est Total 8,516 8,838 9,056 8,619 35,029
age0-19 31% 27% 24% 27% 27%
age20-60 56% 57% 60% 57% 58%
age60plus 13% 16% 17% 16% 15%
immigrants 28% 16% 11% 17% 18%
naturalized 28% 60% 57% 58% 47%
english 49% 76% 84% 77% 72%
spanish 47% 13% 10% 13% 20%
asian-lang 2% 5% 4% 3% 3%
other lang 3% 6% 3% 8% 5%
Language Fluency Speaks Eng "Less
than Very Well"24% 10% 5% 9% 12%
hs-grad 49% 54% 49% 49% 50%
bachelor 14% 26% 30% 29% 25%
graduatedegree 7% 9% 16% 15% 12%
Child in Household child-under18 44% 35% 37% 37% 38%
Pct of Pop Age 16+ employed 61% 65% 68% 66% 65%
income 0-25k 12% 6% 4% 8% 7%
income 25-50k 22% 11% 10% 9% 13%
income 50-75k 19% 16% 9% 15% 15%
income 75-200k 36% 55% 59% 51% 51%
income 200k-plus 11% 11% 18% 18% 15%
single family 66% 95% 88% 91% 86%
multi-family 34% 5% 12% 9% 14%
rented 53% 20% 19% 20% 27%
owned 47% 80% 81% 80% 73%
Total population data from the 2010 Decennial Census.
Surname-based Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database.
Latino voter registration and turnout data are Spanish-surname counts adjusted using Census Population Department
undercount estimates. NH White and NH Black registration and turnout counts estimated by NDC. Citizen Voting Age
Pop., Age, Immigration, and other demographics from the 2012-2016 American Community Survey and Special
Tabulation 5-year data.
Housing Stats
Household Income
Education (among those
age 25+)
Total Pop
City of Moorpark - Map 412
Language spoken at home
8,605
Immigration
Citizen Voting Age Pop
Age
Voter Registration (Nov
2016)
Voter Turnout (Nov
2016)
Voter Turnout (Nov
2014)
66
67
District 1 2 3 4 Total
Ideal Total Pop 8,672 8,731 8,334 8,684 34,421
Deviation from ideal 67 126 -271 79 397
% Deviation 0 78% 1 46% -3 15% 0 92% 4 61%
% Hisp 15% 26% 70% 16% 31%
% NH White 69% 61% 24% 73% 57%
% NH Black 2% 2% 2% 2% 2%
% Asian-American 12% 10% 3% 8% 8%
Total 6,474 6,204 4,470 6,328 23,476
% Hisp 11% 15% 53% 15% 21%
% NH White 77% 70% 43% 75% 68%
% NH Black 0% 3% 1% 2% 2%
% Asian/Pac Isl 11% 11% 2% 7% 8%
Total 5,578 5,947 3,162 5,885 20,573
% Latino est 32% 35% 49% 32% 35%
% Spanish-Surnamed 5% 4% 3% 4% 4%
% Asian-Surnamed 42% 37% 23% 43% 38%
% Filipino-Surnamed 21% 22% 23% 20% 22%
% NH White est 5% 6% 5% 5% 5%
% NH Black 13% 20% 53% 14% 22%
Total 4,713 4,923 2,364 5,055 17,056
% Latino est 33% 36% 51% 32% 36%
% Spanish-Surnamed 5% 4% 3% 4% 4%
% Asian-Surnamed 43% 38% 23% 45% 40%
% Filipino-Surnamed 19% 20% 21% 19% 20%
% NH White est 5% 5% 4% 5% 5%
% NH Black 13% 20% 51% 14% 20%
Total 2,904 2,359 1,082 3,052 9,397
% Latino est 12% 14% 44% 11% 16%
% Spanish-Surnamed 11% 12% 40% 10% 14%
% Asian-Surnamed 5% 3% 4% 3% 4%
% Filipino-Surnamed 1% 1% 1% 1% 1%
% NH White est 81% 81% 48% 82% 78%
% NH Black est 1% 1% 0% 1% 1%
ACS Pop Est Total 8,847 8,918 8,429 8,836 35,029
age0-19 25% 27% 31% 26% 27%
age20-60 58% 57% 57% 58% 58%
age60plus 17% 16% 12% 16% 15%
immigrants 15% 17% 28% 13% 18%
naturalized 59% 60% 27% 58% 47%
english 78% 76% 48% 83% 72%
spanish 13% 13% 47% 9% 20%
asian-lang 4% 5% 2% 3% 3%
other lang 5% 7% 2% 6% 5%
Language Fluency Speaks Eng "Less
than Very Well"7% 10% 24% 6% 12%
hs-grad 46% 54% 52% 49% 50%
bachelor 32% 26% 13% 29% 25%
graduatedegree 15% 10% 5% 17% 12%
Child in Household child-under18 36% 35% 42% 38% 38%
Pct of Pop Age 16+ employed 65% 65% 63% 67% 65%
income 0-25k 5% 6% 13% 5% 7%
income 25-50k 10% 11% 23% 9% 13%
income 50-75k 10% 16% 21% 13% 15%
income 75-200k 52% 55% 40% 54% 51%
income 200k-plus 23% 12% 3% 19% 15%
single family 91% 95% 60% 95% 86%
multi-family 9% 5% 40% 5% 14%
rented 17% 20% 58% 17% 27%
owned 83% 80% 42% 83% 73%
Total population data from the 2010 Decennial Census.
Surname-based Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database.
Latino voter registration and turnout data are Spanish-surname counts adjusted using Census Population Department
undercount estimates. NH White and NH Black registration and turnout counts estimated by NDC. Citizen Voting Age
Pop., Age, Immigration, and other demographics from the 2012-2016 American Community Survey and Special Tabulation
5-year data.
Housing Stats
Household Income
Education (among those
age 25+)
Total Pop
City of Moorpark - Map 422
Language spoken at home
8,605
Immigration
Citizen Voting Age Pop
Age
Voter Registration (Nov
2016)
Voter Turnout (Nov
2016)
Voter Turnout (Nov
2014)
68
69
District 1 2 3 4 Total
Ideal Total Pop 8,595 8,331 8,904 8,591 34,421
Deviation from ideal -10 -274 299 -14 573
% Deviation -0 12% -3 18% 3 47% -0 16% 6 66%
% Hisp 17% 26% 66% 15% 31%
% NH White 69% 60% 27% 73% 57%
% NH Black 2% 2% 2% 2% 2%
% Asian-American 10% 10% 4% 9% 8%
Total 6,384 5,917 4,865 6,310 23,476
% Hisp 13% 16% 48% 14% 21%
% NH White 76% 69% 47% 75% 68%
% NH Black 0% 3% 1% 2% 2%
% Asian/Pac Isl 9% 10% 4% 9% 8%
Total 5,592 5,706 3,588 5,686 20,573
% Latino est 33% 35% 47% 31% 35%
% Spanish-Surnamed 5% 4% 4% 4% 4%
% Asian-Surnamed 41% 37% 25% 44% 38%
% Filipino-Surnamed 21% 22% 23% 20% 22%
% NH White est 5% 6% 5% 5% 5%
% NH Black 14% 21% 48% 12% 22%
Total 4,723 4,706 2,721 4,906 17,056
% Latino est 34% 36% 48% 31% 36%
% Spanish-Surnamed 4% 4% 4% 4% 4%
% Asian-Surnamed 42% 38% 26% 45% 40%
% Filipino-Surnamed 19% 21% 21% 19% 20%
% NH White est 5% 5% 4% 5% 5%
% NH Black 14% 21% 47% 12% 20%
Total 2,860 2,212 1,260 3,064 9,397
% Latino est 12% 14% 41% 10% 16%
% Spanish-Surnamed 11% 13% 36% 9% 14%
% Asian-Surnamed 5% 3% 4% 3% 4%
% Filipino-Surnamed 1% 1% 1% 1% 1%
% NH White est 82% 80% 52% 83% 78%
% NH Black est 1% 1% 0% 1% 1%
ACS Pop Est Total 8,777 8,514 9,004 8,734 35,029
age0-19 24% 27% 31% 27% 27%
age20-60 59% 57% 56% 58% 58%
age60plus 17% 16% 13% 16% 15%
immigrants 14% 16% 27% 14% 18%
naturalized 55% 60% 30% 60% 47%
english 80% 76% 50% 82% 72%
spanish 14% 13% 44% 9% 20%
asian-lang 3% 5% 3% 3% 3%
other lang 4% 6% 3% 7% 5%
Language Fluency Speaks Eng "Less
than Very Well"7% 10% 22% 7% 12%
hs-grad 48% 54% 51% 47% 50%
bachelor 30% 26% 15% 30% 25%
graduatedegree 14% 9% 6% 18% 12%
Child in Household child-under18 36% 35% 42% 38% 38%
Pct of Pop Age 16+ employed 65% 65% 63% 67% 65%
income 0-25k 5% 6% 13% 5% 7%
income 25-50k 12% 12% 20% 7% 13%
income 50-75k 10% 16% 20% 13% 15%
income 75-200k 52% 55% 42% 55% 51%
income 200k-plus 22% 11% 5% 20% 15%
single family 87% 95% 64% 98% 86%
multi-family 13% 5% 36% 2% 14%
rented 20% 21% 54% 14% 27%
owned 80% 79% 46% 86% 73%
Total population data from the 2010 Decennial Census.
Surname-based Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database.
Latino voter registration and turnout data are Spanish-surname counts adjusted using Census Population Department
undercount estimates. NH White and NH Black registration and turnout counts estimated by NDC. Citizen Voting Age
Pop., Age, Immigration, and other demographics from the 2012-2016 American Community Survey and Special Tabulation
5-year data.
Housing Stats
Household Income
Education (among those
age 25+)
Total Pop
City of Moorpark - Map 423
Language spoken at home
8,605
Immigration
Citizen Voting Age Pop
Age
Voter Registration (Nov
2016)
Voter Turnout (Nov
2016)
Voter Turnout (Nov
2014)
70
71
District 1 2 3 Total
Total Pop 11,209 5,475 17,737 34,421
Deviation from ideal -265 -5,999 6,263 12,262
% Deviation -2 31% -52 28% 54 58% 106 87%
% Hisp 29% 72% 20% 31%
% NH White 57% 22% 68% 57%
% NH Black 2% 1% 2% 2%
% Asian-American 10% 5% 8% 8%
Total 7,701 2,594 13,182 23,476
% Hisp 17% 53% 17% 21%
% NH White 68% 40% 74% 68%
% NH Black 3% 1% 1% 2%
% Asian/Pac Isl 11% 5% 7% 8%
Total 7,337 2,186 11,050 20,573
% Latino est 36% 43% 33% 35%
% Spanish-Surnamed 4% 5% 4% 4%
% Asian-Surnamed 36% 30% 41% 38%
% Filipino-Surnamed 22% 23% 21% 22%
% NH White est 6% 5% 5% 5%
% NH Black 24% 41% 16% 22%
Total 6,004 1,703 9,348 17,056
% Latino est 37% 44% 34% 36%
% Spanish-Surnamed 4% 5% 4% 4%
% Asian-Surnamed 37% 31% 42% 40%
% Filipino-Surnamed 21% 21% 19% 20%
% NH White est 5% 5% 5% 5%
% NH Black 23% 39% 16% 20%
Total 2,711 990 5,695 9,397
% Latino est 15% 31% 13% 16%
% Spanish-Surnamed 13% 28% 12% 14%
% Asian-Surnamed 3% 5% 4% 4%
% Filipino-Surnamed 1% 1% 1% 1%
% NH White est 79% 59% 80% 78%
% NH Black est 1% 1% 1% 1%
ACS Pop Est Total 11,422 5,593 18,015 35,029
age0-19 28% 33% 25% 27%
age20-60 56% 54% 59% 58%
age60plus 15% 12% 16% 15%
immigrants 19% 31% 13% 18%
naturalized 53% 30% 54% 47%
english 71% 46% 81% 72%
spanish 18% 48% 13% 20%
asian-lang 5% 2% 3% 3%
other lang 7% 4% 4% 5%
Language Fluency Speaks Eng "Less
than Very Well"12% 27% 6% 12%
hs-grad 51% 42% 52% 50%
bachelor 25% 16% 28% 25%
graduatedegree 10% 8% 14% 12%
Child in Household child-under18 37% 47% 37% 38%
Pct of Pop Age 16+ employed 65% 61% 66% 65%
income 0-25k 8% 10% 6% 7%
income 25-50k 12% 20% 12% 13%
income 50-75k 16% 16% 13% 15%
income 75-200k 53% 34% 53% 51%
income 200k-plus 11% 20% 16% 15%
single family 92% 83% 83% 86%
multi-family 8% 17% 17% 14%
rented 24% 40% 25% 27%
owned 76% 60% 75% 73%
Total population data from the 2010 Decennial Census.
Surname-based Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database.
Latino voter registration and turnout data are Spanish-surname counts adjusted using Census Population
Department undercount estimates. NH White and NH Black registration and turnout counts estimated by NDC.
Citizen Voting Age Pop., Age, Immigration, and other demographics from the 2012-2016 American Community
Survey and Special Tabulation 5-year data.
Housing Stats
Household Income
Education (among those
age 25+)
Total Pop
City of Moorpark - Map 304
Language spoken at home
Immigration
Citizen Voting Age Pop
Age
Voter Registration (Nov
2016)
Voter Turnout (Nov
2016)
Voter Turnout (Nov
2014)
72
73
District 1 2 3 4 Total
Ideal Total Pop 8,955 8,080 9,511 7,875 34,421
Deviation from ideal 350 -525 906 -730 1,636
% Deviation 4 07% -6 10% 10 53% -8 48% 19 01%
% Hisp 29% 58% 26% 13% 31%
% NH White 58% 34% 62% 75% 57%
% NH Black 2% 1% 2% 2% 2%
% Asian-American 10% 6% 9% 8% 8%
Total 6,274 4,312 6,945 5,946 23,476
% Hisp 20% 33% 23% 12% 21%
% NH White 64% 58% 68% 78% 68%
% NH Black 3% 1% 1% 1% 2%
% Asian/Pac Isl 11% 7% 7% 7% 8%
Total 5,297 4,291 5,794 5,191 20,573
% Latino est 36% 40% 35% 31% 35%
% Spanish-Surnamed 4% 4% 4% 4% 4%
% Asian-Surnamed 36% 32% 39% 44% 38%
% Filipino-Surnamed 22% 23% 21% 20% 22%
% NH White est 5% 5% 5% 5% 5%
% NH Black 22% 35% 20% 11% 22%
Total 4,352 3,395 4,844 4,464 17,056
% Latino est 37% 41% 36% 31% 36%
% Spanish-Surnamed 4% 4% 4% 4% 4%
% Asian-Surnamed 38% 33% 40% 45% 40%
% Filipino-Surnamed 20% 21% 19% 19% 20%
% NH White est 5% 5% 5% 5% 5%
% NH Black 21% 33% 19% 11% 20%
Total 1,986 1,655 2,966 2,790 9,397
% Latino est 13% 28% 16% 9% 16%
% Spanish-Surnamed 12% 26% 15% 8% 14%
% Asian-Surnamed 4% 4% 4% 3% 4%
% Filipino-Surnamed 1% 1% 1% 1% 1%
% NH White est 80% 65% 76% 86% 78%
% NH Black est 1% 0% 1% 1% 1%
ACS Pop Est Total 9,112 8,200 9,714 8,002 35,029
age0-19 29% 30% 26% 25% 27%
age20-60 56% 57% 58% 59% 58%
age60plus 15% 14% 16% 16% 15%
immigrants 20% 24% 15% 12% 18%
naturalized 51% 36% 46% 62% 47%
english 69% 59% 74% 85% 72%
spanish 19% 34% 20% 7% 20%
asian-lang 5% 3% 3% 3% 3%
other lang 7% 4% 3% 5% 5%
Language Fluency Speaks Eng "Less
than Very Well"13% 18% 9% 6% 12%
hs-grad 50% 52% 52% 47% 50%
bachelor 26% 19% 24% 32% 25%
graduatedegree 11% 7% 13% 17% 12%
Child in Household child-under18 37% 39% 38% 37% 38%
Pct of Pop Age 16+ employed 65% 64% 64% 68% 65%
income 0-25k 8% 10% 7% 4% 7%
income 25-50k 11% 17% 14% 8% 13%
income 50-75k 16% 18% 13% 11% 15%
income 75-200k 52% 47% 48% 56% 51%
income 200k-plus 12% 7% 18% 20% 15%
single family 92% 77% 78% 98% 86%
multi-family 8% 23% 22% 2% 14%
rented 24% 40% 32% 12% 27%
owned 76% 60% 68% 88% 73%
Total population data from the 2010 Decennial Census.
Surname-based Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database.
Latino voter registration and turnout data are Spanish-surname counts adjusted using Census Population Department
undercount estimates. NH White and NH Black registration and turnout counts estimated by NDC. Citizen Voting Age
Pop., Age, Immigration, and other demographics from the 2012-2016 American Community Survey and Special
Tabulation 5-year data.
Housing Stats
Household Income
Education (among those
age 25+)
Total Pop
City of Moorpark - Map 403
Language spoken at home
8,605
Immigration
Citizen Voting Age Pop
Age
Voter Registration (Nov
2016)
Voter Turnout (Nov
2016)
Voter Turnout (Nov
2014)
74
75
District 1 2 3 4 Total
Ideal Total Pop 5,475 9,372 7,373 12,201 34,421
Deviation from ideal -3,130 767 -1,232 3,596 6,726
% Deviation -36 37% 8 91% -14 32% 41 79% 78 16%
% Hisp 72% 33% 15% 22% 31%
% NH White 22% 55% 72% 66% 57%
% NH Black 1% 2% 2% 2% 2%
% Asian-American 5% 9% 10% 9% 8%
Total 2,594 6,479 5,296 9,108 23,476
% Hisp 53% 19% 13% 18% 21%
% NH White 40% 67% 73% 73% 68%
% NH Black 1% 3% 3% 0% 2%
% Asian/Pac Isl 5% 10% 10% 7% 8%
Total 2,186 6,238 4,872 7,277 20,573
% Latino est 43% 37% 31% 35% 35%
% Spanish-Surnamed 5% 4% 5% 4% 4%
% Asian-Surnamed 30% 35% 44% 39% 38%
% Filipino-Surnamed 23% 23% 20% 21% 22%
% NH White est 5% 6% 5% 5% 5%
% NH Black 41% 26% 12% 18% 22%
Total 1,703 5,058 4,197 6,097 17,056
% Latino est 44% 38% 31% 36% 36%
% Spanish-Surnamed 5% 4% 4% 4% 4%
% Asian-Surnamed 31% 36% 46% 40% 40%
% Filipino-Surnamed 21% 21% 19% 19% 20%
% NH White est 5% 5% 4% 5% 5%
% NH Black 39% 25% 12% 17% 20%
Total 990 2,147 2,562 3,697 9,397
% Latino est 31% 16% 10% 15% 16%
% Spanish-Surnamed 28% 14% 9% 14% 14%
% Asian-Surnamed 5% 3% 3% 4% 4%
% Filipino-Surnamed 1% 1% 1% 1% 1%
% NH White est 59% 78% 84% 78% 78%
% NH Black est 1% 1% 1% 0% 1%
ACS Pop Est Total 5,593 9,568 7,476 12,393 35,029
age0-19 33% 28% 27% 24% 27%
age20-60 54% 57% 57% 59% 58%
age60plus 12% 15% 16% 17% 15%
immigrants 31% 18% 17% 12% 18%
naturalized 30% 51% 60% 51% 47%
english 46% 72% 77% 80% 72%
spanish 48% 18% 11% 14% 20%
asian-lang 2% 4% 3% 3% 3%
other lang 4% 6% 8% 2% 5%
Language Fluency Speaks Eng "Less
than Very Well"27% 12% 9% 6% 12%
hs-grad 42% 53% 47% 53% 50%
bachelor 16% 24% 31% 27% 25%
graduatedegree 8% 8% 16% 14% 12%
Child in Household child-under18 47% 36% 37% 37% 38%
Pct of Pop Age 16+ employed 61% 65% 66% 66% 65%
income 0-25k 10% 7% 7% 6% 7%
income 25-50k 20% 13% 7% 13% 13%
income 50-75k 16% 16% 15% 12% 15%
income 75-200k 34% 53% 51% 54% 51%
income 200k-plus 20% 10% 19% 14% 15%
single family 83% 92% 96% 76% 86%
multi-family 17% 8% 4% 24% 14%
rented 40% 25% 15% 30% 27%
owned 60% 75% 85% 70% 73%
Total population data from the 2010 Decennial Census.
Surname-based Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database.
Latino voter registration and turnout data are Spanish-surname counts adjusted using Census Population Department
undercount estimates. NH White and NH Black registration and turnout counts estimated by NDC. Citizen Voting Age
Pop., Age, Immigration, and other demographics from the 2012-2016 American Community Survey and Special
Tabulation 5-year data.
Housing Stats
Household Income
Education (among those
age 25+)
Total Pop
City of Moorpark - Map 405
Language spoken at home
8,605
Immigration
Citizen Voting Age Pop
Age
Voter Registration (Nov
2016)
Voter Turnout (Nov
2016)
Voter Turnout (Nov
2014)
76
77
District 1 2 3 4 Total
Ideal Total Pop 9,464 8,329 8,621 8,007 34,421
Deviation from ideal 859 -276 16 -598 1,457
% Deviation 9 98% -3 21% 0 19% -6 95% 16 93%
% Hisp 63% 30% 15% 14% 31%
% NH White 29% 58% 72% 73% 57%
% NH Black 2% 2% 2% 2% 2%
% Asian-American 5% 9% 9% 10% 8%
Total 5,261 5,962 6,258 5,996 23,476
% Hisp 45% 18% 13% 11% 21%
% NH White 49% 68% 74% 78% 68%
% NH Black 1% 3% 2% 0% 2%
% Asian/Pac Isl 4% 10% 10% 9% 8%
Total 3,802 5,633 5,665 5,472 20,573
% Latino est 46% 35% 31% 33% 35%
% Spanish-Surnamed 4% 4% 5% 4% 4%
% Asian-Surnamed 26% 37% 44% 42% 38%
% Filipino-Surnamed 23% 22% 20% 21% 22%
% NH White est 5% 6% 5% 5% 5%
% NH Black 47% 22% 12% 13% 22%
Total 2,896 4,629 4,883 4,647 17,056
% Latino est 48% 36% 31% 34% 36%
% Spanish-Surnamed 4% 4% 4% 4% 4%
% Asian-Surnamed 27% 38% 46% 43% 40%
% Filipino-Surnamed 21% 21% 19% 19% 20%
% NH White est 4% 6% 5% 5% 5%
% NH Black 45% 22% 12% 12% 20%
Total 1,548 2,136 2,979 2,734 9,397
% Latino est 37% 16% 10% 10% 16%
% Spanish-Surnamed 33% 14% 9% 9% 14%
% Asian-Surnamed 4% 3% 3% 4% 4%
% Filipino-Surnamed 1% 1% 1% 1% 1%
% NH White est 55% 78% 85% 82% 78%
% NH Black est 1% 1% 1% 0% 1%
ACS Pop Est Total 9,631 8,515 8,752 8,131 35,029
age0-19 31% 27% 27% 23% 27%
age20-60 56% 58% 57% 60% 58%
age60plus 13% 16% 16% 17% 15%
immigrants 27% 16% 16% 11% 18%
naturalized 30% 60% 60% 57% 47%
english 51% 77% 79% 83% 72%
spanish 44% 12% 10% 10% 20%
asian-lang 2% 5% 3% 4% 3%
other lang 3% 6% 8% 3% 5%
Language Fluency Speaks Eng "Less
than Very Well"22% 9% 8% 5% 12%
hs-grad 50% 55% 47% 49% 50%
bachelor 15% 26% 30% 31% 25%
graduatedegree 7% 9% 17% 15% 12%
Child in Household child-under18 43% 34% 38% 36% 38%
Pct of Pop Age 16+ employed 61% 65% 67% 67% 65%
income 0-25k 12% 6% 6% 4% 7%
income 25-50k 22% 12% 7% 10% 13%
income 50-75k 19% 16% 14% 9% 15%
income 75-200k 37% 55% 54% 58% 51%
income 200k-plus 10% 11% 19% 18% 15%
single family 65% 95% 97% 87% 86%
multi-family 35% 5% 3% 13% 14%
rented 53% 21% 15% 19% 27%
owned 47% 79% 85% 81% 73%
Total population data from the 2010 Decennial Census.
Surname-based Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database.
Latino voter registration and turnout data are Spanish-surname counts adjusted using Census Population Department
undercount estimates. NH White and NH Black registration and turnout counts estimated by NDC. Citizen Voting Age
Pop., Age, Immigration, and other demographics from the 2012-2016 American Community Survey and Special
Tabulation 5-year data.
Housing Stats
Household Income
Education (among those
age 25+)
Total Pop
City of Moorpark - Map 406
Language spoken at home
8,605
Immigration
Citizen Voting Age Pop
Age
Voter Registration (Nov
2016)
Voter Turnout (Nov
2016)
Voter Turnout (Nov
2014)
78
79
District 1 2 3 4 Total
Ideal Total Pop 8,741 7,723 9,080 8,877 34,421
Deviation from ideal 136 -882 475 272 1,357
% Deviation 1 58% -10 25% 5 52% 3 16% 15 77%
% Hisp 29% 69% 19% 14% 31%
% NH White 57% 25% 68% 73% 57%
% NH Black 2% 1% 2% 1% 2%
% Asian-American 11% 3% 9% 9% 8%
Total 6,100 4,080 6,529 6,767 23,476
% Hisp 17% 49 8% 17% 11% 21%
% NH White 69% 45% 71% 78% 68%
% NH Black 3% 1% 2% 0% 2%
% Asian/Pac Isl 10% 3% 9% 9% 8%
Total 5,769 3,065 5,675 6,063 20,573
% Latino est 35% 47% 34% 31% 35%
% Spanish-Surnamed 5% 3% 4% 4% 4%
% Asian-Surnamed 37% 24% 40% 43% 38%
% Filipino-Surnamed 22% 23% 21% 20% 22%
% NH White est 6% 5% 5% 5% 5%
% NH Black 23% 47% 17% 11% 22%
Total 4,747 2,306 4,824 5,178 17,056
% Latino est 36% 49% 34% 32% 36%
% Spanish-Surnamed 4% 3% 4% 4% 4%
% Asian-Surnamed 38% 25% 42% 45% 40%
% Filipino-Surnamed 21% 21% 19% 19% 20%
% NH White est 5% 5% 5% 5% 5%
% NH Black 22% 45% 17% 11% 20%
Total 2,540 886 2,880 3,090 9,397
% Latino est 17% 43% 13% 9% 16%
% Spanish-Surnamed 15% 38% 12% 8% 14%
% Asian-Surnamed 4% 4% 3% 4% 4%
% Filipino-Surnamed 1% 1% 1% 1% 1%
% NH White est 77% 49% 79% 85% 78%
% NH Black est 1% 1% 1% 1% 1%
ACS Pop Est Total 8,979 7,820 9,223 9,007 35,029
age0-19 27% 32% 27% 23% 27%
age20-60 57% 57% 57% 60% 58%
age60plus 16% 12% 16% 17% 15%
immigrants 17% 28% 15% 12% 18%
naturalized 59% 28% 54% 61% 47%
english 75% 48% 77% 83% 72%
spanish 14% 46% 14% 9% 20%
asian-lang 4% 3% 3% 3% 3%
other lang 7% 3% 6% 4% 5%
Language Fluency Speaks Eng "Less
than Very Well"10% 25% 8% 6% 12%
hs-grad 52% 50% 51% 48% 50%
bachelor 26% 14% 26% 32% 25%
graduatedegree 11% 5% 16% 15% 12%
Child in Household child-under18 36% 43% 39% 35% 38%
Pct of Pop Age 16+ employed 63% 64% 66% 67% 65%
income 0-25k 6% 12% 8% 5% 7%
income 25-50k 12% 22% 10% 10% 13%
income 50-75k 15% 20% 14% 11% 15%
income 75-200k 50% 42% 52% 56% 51%
income 200k-plus 17% 5% 16% 18% 15%
single family 95% 70% 84% 91% 86%
multi-family 5% 30% 16% 9% 14%
rented 20% 51% 27% 16% 27%
owned 80% 49% 73% 84% 73%
Total population data from the 2010 Decennial Census.
Surname-based Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database.
Latino voter registration and turnout data are Spanish-surname counts adjusted using Census Population Department
undercount estimates. NH White and NH Black registration and turnout counts estimated by NDC. Citizen Voting Age
Pop., Age, Immigration, and other demographics from the 2012-2016 American Community Survey and Special
Tabulation 5-year data.
Housing Stats
Household Income
Education (among those
age 25+)
Total Pop
City of Moorpark - Map 409
Language spoken at home
8,605
Immigration
Citizen Voting Age Pop
Age
Voter Registration (Nov
2016)
Voter Turnout (Nov
2016)
Voter Turnout (Nov
2014)
80
81
District 1 2 3 4 Total
Ideal Total Pop 8,208 8,935 8,963 8,315 34,421
Deviation from ideal -397 330 358 -290 755
% Deviation -4 61% 3 84% 4 16% -3 37% 8 77%
% Hisp 17% 44% 27% 37% 31%
% NH White 69% 47% 60% 53% 57%
% NH Black 2% 2% 2% 2% 2%
% Asian-American 10% 7% 10% 6% 8%
Total 6,101 5,842 6,370 5,164 23,476
% Hisp 13% 32 5% 17% 24% 21%
% NH White 76% 60% 68% 67% 68%
% NH Black 0% 1% 3% 2% 2%
% Asian/Pac Isl 10% 6% 10% 7% 8%
Total 5,204 4,407 5,997 4,964 20,573
% Latino est 33% 38% 35% 36% 35%
% Spanish-Surnamed 5% 4% 4% 4% 4%
% Asian-Surnamed 41% 36% 37% 38% 38%
% Filipino-Surnamed 21% 22% 22% 21% 22%
% NH White est 5% 5% 6% 5% 5%
% NH Black 15% 28% 20% 24% 22%
Total 4,385 3,609 4,964 4,098 17,056
% Latino est 34% 39% 36% 36% 36%
% Spanish-Surnamed 4% 4% 4% 4% 4%
% Asian-Surnamed 42% 37% 38% 40% 40%
% Filipino-Surnamed 19% 20% 20% 19% 20%
% NH White est 5% 5% 5% 4% 5%
% NH Black 14% 27% 20% 22% 20%
Total 2,736 2,111 2,381 2,169 9,397
% Latino est 12% 24% 14% 14% 16%
% Spanish-Surnamed 11% 22% 12% 13% 14%
% Asian-Surnamed 5% 4% 3% 3% 4%
% Filipino-Surnamed 1% 1% 1% 1% 1%
% NH White est 81% 67% 81% 80% 78%
% NH Black est 1% 0% 1% 1% 1%
ACS Pop Est Total 8,381 9,067 9,155 8,426 35,029
age0-19 24% 29% 27% 29% 27%
age20-60 59% 56% 57% 58% 58%
age60plus 17% 15% 16% 14% 15%
immigrants 14% 19% 17% 22% 18%
naturalized 55% 40% 60% 39% 47%
english 79% 66% 76% 66% 72%
spanish 14% 26% 13% 27% 20%
asian-lang 3% 4% 5% 2% 3%
other lang 4% 4% 7% 5% 5%
Language Fluency Speaks Eng "Less
than Very Well"7% 13% 10% 17% 12%
hs-grad 48% 51% 54% 47% 50%
bachelor 30% 21% 26% 24% 25%
graduatedegree 14% 13% 10% 12% 12%
Child in Household child-under18 36% 41% 35% 40% 38%
Pct of Pop Age 16+ employed 64% 65% 65% 66% 65%
income 0-25k 5% 9% 6% 8% 7%
income 25-50k 12% 14% 11% 13% 13%
income 50-75k 10% 15% 16% 17% 15%
income 75-200k 51% 50% 55% 47% 51%
income 200k-plus 21% 12% 12% 14% 15%
single family 86% 74% 95% 90% 86%
multi-family 14% 26% 5% 10% 14%
rented 21% 38% 20% 26% 27%
owned 79% 62% 80% 74% 73%
Total population data from the 2010 Decennial Census.
Surname-based Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database.
Latino voter registration and turnout data are Spanish-surname counts adjusted using Census Population Department
undercount estimates. NH White and NH Black registration and turnout counts estimated by NDC. Citizen Voting Age
Pop., Age, Immigration, and other demographics from the 2012-2016 American Community Survey and Special
Tabulation 5-year data.
Housing Stats
Household Income
Education (among those
age 25+)
Total Pop
City of Moorpark - Map 410
Language spoken at home
8,605
Immigration
Citizen Voting Age Pop
Age
Voter Registration (Nov
2016)
Voter Turnout (Nov
2016)
Voter Turnout (Nov
2014)
82
83
District 1 2 3 4 Total
Ideal Total Pop 8,159 9,063 8,172 9,027 34,421
Deviation from ideal -446 458 -433 422 904
% Deviation -5 18% 5 32% -5 03% 4 90% 10 51%
% Hisp 17% 26% 70% 15% 31%
% NH White 69% 60% 24% 73% 57%
% NH Black 2% 2% 2% 2% 2%
% Asian-American 10% 10% 4% 9% 8%
Total 6,068 6,419 4,363 6,627 23,476
% Hisp 13% 15% 52% 14% 21%
% NH White 76% 70% 44% 75% 68%
% NH Black 0% 3% 1% 2% 2%
% Asian/Pac Isl 10% 11% 2% 8% 8%
Total 5,184 6,189 3,105 6,094 20,573
% Latino est 33% 35% 49% 31% 35%
% Spanish-Surnamed 5% 4% 3% 4% 4%
% Asian-Surnamed 41% 37% 23% 44% 38%
% Filipino-Surnamed 21% 22% 23% 20% 22%
% NH White est 5% 6% 5% 5% 5%
% NH Black 15% 21% 53% 12% 22%
Total 4,369 5,107 2,320 5,260 17,056
% Latino est 34% 36% 51% 31% 36%
% Spanish-Surnamed 4% 4% 3% 4% 4%
% Asian-Surnamed 42% 38% 23% 45% 40%
% Filipino-Surnamed 19% 21% 21% 19% 20%
% NH White est 5% 5% 4% 5% 5%
% NH Black 14% 21% 51% 12% 20%
Total 2,726 2,416 1,057 3,198 9,397
% Latino est 12% 15% 44% 10% 16%
% Spanish-Surnamed 11% 14% 40% 9% 14%
% Asian-Surnamed 5% 3% 4% 3% 4%
% Filipino-Surnamed 1% 1% 1% 1% 1%
% NH White est 81% 79% 48% 83% 78%
% NH Black est 1% 1% 0% 1% 1%
ACS Pop Est Total 8,331 9,253 8,266 9,179 35,029
age0-19 24% 27% 31% 27% 27%
age20-60 59% 57% 57% 58% 58%
age60plus 17% 16% 12% 16% 15%
immigrants 14% 17% 27% 14% 18%
naturalized 55% 60% 27% 60% 47%
english 79% 75% 49% 82% 72%
spanish 14% 13% 47% 9% 20%
asian-lang 3% 5% 2% 3% 3%
other lang 4% 7% 2% 6% 5%
Language Fluency Speaks Eng "Less
than Very Well"7% 10% 23% 7% 12%
hs-grad 48% 53% 52% 47% 50%
bachelor 30% 26% 13% 30% 25%
graduatedegree 14% 10% 5% 18% 12%
Child in Household child-under18 36% 35% 42% 39% 38%
Pct of Pop Age 16+ employed 64% 65% 63% 67% 65%
income 0-25k 5% 7% 13% 5% 7%
income 25-50k 12% 11% 23% 7% 13%
income 50-75k 10% 16% 21% 12% 15%
income 75-200k 51% 55% 40% 55% 51%
income 200k-plus 22% 12% 4% 20% 15%
single family 87% 94% 60% 98% 86%
multi-family 13% 6% 40% 2% 14%
rented 21% 20% 58% 14% 27%
owned 79% 80% 42% 86% 73%
Total population data from the 2010 Decennial Census.
Surname-based Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database.
Latino voter registration and turnout data are Spanish-surname counts adjusted using Census Population Department
undercount estimates. NH White and NH Black registration and turnout counts estimated by NDC. Citizen Voting Age
Pop., Age, Immigration, and other demographics from the 2012-2016 American Community Survey and Special Tabulation
5-year data.
Housing Stats
Household Income
Education (among those
age 25+)
Total Pop
City of Moorpark - Map 421
Language spoken at home
8,605
Immigration
Citizen Voting Age Pop
Age
Voter Registration (Nov
2016)
Voter Turnout (Nov
2016)
Voter Turnout (Nov
2014)
84
85
District 1 2345Total
Ideal Total Pop 6,920 6,879 6,876 6,703 7,043 34,421
Deviation from ideal 36 -5 -8 -181 159 340
% Deviation 0 52% -0 07% -0 12% -2 63% 2 31% 4 94%
% Hisp 31% 30% 69% 15% 13% 31%
% NH White 55% 59% 25% 72% 75% 57%
% NH Black 2% 2% 2% 2% 1% 2%
% Asian-American 9% 8% 4% 10% 10% 8%
Total 4,495 4,974 3,632 4,796 5,579 23,476
% Hisp 23% 17% 49% 13% 11% 21%
% NH White 64% 70% 47% 74% 78% 68%
% NH Black 1% 3% 1% 3% 1% 2%
% Asian/Pac Isl 10% 8% 2% 10% 9% 8%
Total 3,986 4,843 2,522 4,349 4,873 20,573
% Latino est 35% 36% 52% 31% 31% 35%
% Spanish-Surnamed 5% 4% 3% 5% 4% 4%
% Asian-Surnamed 39% 36% 20% 44% 43% 38%
% Filipino-Surnamed 21% 22% 24% 20% 21% 22%
% NH White est 5% 6% 5% 5% 5% 5%
% NH Black 23% 22% 57% 12% 10% 22%
Total 3,302 3,973 1,850 3,745 4,186 17,056
% Latino est 35% 37% 54% 31% 32% 36%
% Spanish-Surnamed 5% 3% 3% 4% 4% 4%
% Asian-Surnamed 41% 37% 20% 46% 44% 40%
% Filipino-Surnamed 19% 21% 21% 19% 19% 20%
% NH White est 5% 6% 4% 4% 5% 5%
% NH Black 22% 22% 56% 12% 10% 20%
Total 2,007 1,793 791 2,359 2,446 9,397
% Latino est 19% 15% 49% 10% 8% 16%
% Spanish-Surnamed 17% 13% 44% 9% 7% 14%
% Asian-Surnamed 5% 3% 4% 3% 4% 4%
% Filipino-Surnamed 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1%
% NH White est 74% 80% 44% 84% 84% 78%
% NH Black est 1% 1% 0% 1% 0% 1%
ACS Pop Est Total 7,066 7,048 6,954 6,795 7,165 35,029
age0-19 28% 26% 31% 27% 24% 27%
age20-60 56% 59% 57% 57% 59% 58%
age60plus 17% 15% 12% 16% 16% 15%
immigrants 21% 14% 27% 18% 10% 18%
naturalized 48% 60% 25% 60% 63% 47%
english 67% 79% 48% 77% 87% 72%
spanish 24% 11% 49% 11% 5% 20%
asian-lang 4% 4% 2% 3% 4% 3%
other lang 6% 5% 1% 8% 3% 5%
Language Fluency Speaks Eng "Less
than Very Well"13% 9% 24% 9% 4% 12%
hs-grad 48% 57% 54% 47% 45% 50%
bachelor 25% 25% 12% 31% 33% 25%
graduatedegree 13% 8% 4% 16% 18% 12%
Child in Household child-under18 39% 34% 42% 37% 37% 38%
Pct of Pop Age 16+ employed 62% 65% 63% 66% 69% 65%
income 0-25k 9% 5% 13% 7% 2% 7%
income 25-50k 13% 14% 24% 7% 7% 13%
income 50-75k 14% 16% 22% 15% 7% 15%
income 75-200k 44% 55% 39% 51% 63% 51%
income 200k-plus 20% 10% 2% 19% 21% 15%
single family 80% 95% 56% 96% 99% 86%
multi-family 20% 5% 44% 4% 1% 14%
rented 31% 21% 62% 15% 10% 27%
owned 69% 79% 38% 85% 90% 73%
Total population data from the 2010 Decennial Census.
Surname-based Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database.
Latino voter registration and turnout data are Spanish-surname counts adjusted using Census Population Department
undercount estimates. NH White and NH Black registration and turnout counts estimated by NDC. Citizen Voting Age Pop.,
Age, Immigration, and other demographics from the 2012-2016 American Community Survey and Special Tabulation 5-year
data.
Housing Stats
Household Income
Education (among those
age 25+)
Total Pop
City of Moorpark - Map 508
Language spoken at home
6,884
Immigration
Citizen Voting Age Pop
Age
Voter Registration (Nov
2016)
Voter Turnout (Nov
2016)
Voter Turnout (Nov
2014)
86
87
District 1 2345Total
Ideal Total Pop 6,974 6,786 6,785 6,997 6,879 34,421
Deviation from ideal 90 -98 -99 113 -5 212
% Deviation 1 31% -1 42% -1 44% 1 64% -0 07% 3 08%
% Hisp 17% 72% 23% 20% 26% 31%
% NH White 68% 23% 64% 69% 61% 57%
% NH Black 2% 1% 2% 2% 2% 2%
% Asian-American 11% 3% 9% 9% 10% 8%
Total 5,016 3,622 4,746 5,174 4,918 23,476
% Hisp 13% 55% 16% 14% 17% 21%
% NH White 75% 42% 71% 76% 68% 68%
% NH Black 0% 1% 1% 2% 3% 2%
% Asian/Pac Isl 10% 2% 11% 7% 10% 8%
Total 4,384 2,417 4,569 5,197 4,005 20,573
% Latino est 33% 48% 35% 32% 35% 35%
% Spanish-Surnamed 5% 3% 5% 5% 3% 4%
% Asian-Surnamed 41% 24% 39% 42% 37% 38%
% Filipino-Surnamed 21% 23% 21% 21% 22% 22%
% NH White est 5% 5% 5% 5% 6% 5%
% NH Black 16% 51% 20% 16% 19% 22%
Total 3,688 1,828 3,817 4,419 3,304 17,056
% Latino est 34% 50% 35% 32% 36% 36%
% Spanish-Surnamed 5% 3% 4% 4% 3% 4%
% Asian-Surnamed 42% 25% 41% 44% 38% 40%
% Filipino-Surnamed 19% 21% 20% 19% 20% 20%
% NH White est 5% 4% 5% 5% 6% 5%
% NH Black 15% 49% 19% 16% 19% 20%
Total 2,297 1,095 1,854 2,278 1,872 9,397
% Latino est 13% 42% 11% 11% 13% 16%
% Spanish-Surnamed 12% 38% 10% 10% 12% 14%
% Asian-Surnamed 5% 3% 4% 3% 3% 4%
% Filipino-Surnamed 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1%
% NH White est 80% 45% 84% 83% 81% 78%
% NH Black est 1% 0% 0% 1% 1% 1%
ACS Pop Est Total 7,134 6,859 6,893 7,109 7,034 35,029
age0-19 24% 31% 29% 26% 27% 27%
age20-60 59% 57% 56% 58% 58% 58%
age60plus 17% 13% 15% 16% 16% 15%
immigrants 14% 27% 17% 15% 16% 18%
naturalized 55% 28% 46% 61% 60% 47%
english 78% 49% 74% 80% 77% 72%
spanish 15% 46% 18% 10% 12% 20%
asian-lang 3% 2% 4% 3% 5% 3%
other lang 4% 2% 5% 7% 6% 5%
Language Fluency Speaks Eng "Less
than Very Well"7% 23% 11% 8% 9% 12%
hs-grad 49% 53% 46% 48% 55% 50%
bachelor 29% 13% 26% 31% 26% 25%
graduatedegree 14% 5% 16% 15% 9% 12%
Child in Household child-under18 36% 41% 41% 36% 34% 38%
Pct of Pop Age 16+ employed 63% 63% 67% 66% 65% 65%
income 0-25k 5% 13% 6% 6% 6% 7%
income 25-50k 13% 22% 9% 9% 12% 13%
income 50-75k 11% 21% 12% 14% 16% 15%
income 75-200k 49% 40% 56% 53% 55% 51%
income 200k-plus 22% 3% 17% 18% 11% 15%
single family 85% 57% 92% 97% 95% 86%
multi-family 15% 43% 8% 3% 5% 14%
rented 23% 59% 22% 15% 21% 27%
owned 77% 41% 78% 85% 79% 73%
Total population data from the 2010 Decennial Census.
Surname-based Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database.
Latino voter registration and turnout data are Spanish-surname counts adjusted using Census Population Department
undercount estimates. NH White and NH Black registration and turnout counts estimated by NDC. Citizen Voting Age Pop.,
Age, Immigration, and other demographics from the 2012-2016 American Community Survey and Special Tabulation 5-year
data.
Housing Stats
Household Income
Education (among those
age 25+)
Total Pop
City of Moorpark - Map 514
Language spoken at home
6,884
Immigration
Citizen Voting Age Pop
Age
Voter Registration (Nov
2016)
Voter Turnout (Nov
2016)
Voter Turnout (Nov
2014)
88
89
District 1 2345Total
Ideal Total Pop 7,061 7,106 6,856 6,520 6,878 34,421
Deviation from ideal 177 222 -28 -364 -6 586
% Deviation 2 57% 3 22% -0 41% -5 29% -0 09% 8 51%
% Hisp 31% 31% 66% 13% 15% 31%
% NH White 54% 57% 28% 73% 74% 57%
% NH Black 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2%
% Asian-American 12% 8% 3% 10% 8% 8%
Total 4,520 5,133 3,764 5,080 4,979 23,476
% Hisp 18% 20% 51% 10% 15% 21%
% NH White 64% 68% 46% 79% 76% 68%
% NH Black 2% 3% 1% 0% 2% 2%
% Asian/Pac Isl 14% 8% 1% 10% 7% 8%
Total 4,095 4,858 2,583 4,426 4,611 20,573
% Latino est 35% 36% 50% 32% 31% 35%
% Spanish-Surnamed 6% 4% 3% 5% 4% 4%
% Asian-Surnamed 39% 36% 22% 43% 44% 38%
% Filipino-Surnamed 22% 22% 23% 21% 20% 22%
% NH White est 5% 6% 5% 5% 5% 5%
% NH Black 23% 22% 53% 11% 12% 22%
Total 3,381 3,986 1,940 3,766 3,983 17,056
% Latino est 35% 37% 52% 33% 31% 36%
% Spanish-Surnamed 5% 3% 3% 4% 4% 4%
% Asian-Surnamed 41% 37% 23% 44% 45% 40%
% Filipino-Surnamed 20% 21% 20% 19% 19% 20%
% NH White est 5% 6% 4% 5% 5% 5%
% NH Black 22% 22% 52% 11% 12% 20%
Total 1,809 1,802 1,144 2,250 2,392 9,397
% Latino est 15% 15% 44% 9% 10% 16%
% Spanish-Surnamed 14% 13% 39% 8% 9% 14%
% Asian-Surnamed 5% 3% 3% 4% 3% 4%
% Filipino-Surnamed 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1%
% NH White est 76% 80% 44% 85% 86% 78%
% NH Black est 2% 1% 0% 0% 1% 1%
ACS Pop Est Total 7,200 7,281 6,933 6,612 7,003 35,029
age0-19 31% 26% 30% 22% 26% 27%
age20-60 53% 59% 57% 60% 58% 58%
age60plus 16% 15% 12% 17% 16% 15%
immigrants 25% 14% 26% 12% 12% 18%
naturalized 50% 60% 25% 61% 59% 47%
english 62% 79% 50% 84% 84% 72%
spanish 25% 11% 48% 9% 8% 20%
asian-lang 5% 4% 2% 4% 3% 3%
other lang 9% 5% 1% 3% 6% 5%
Language Fluency Speaks Eng "Less
than Very Well"16% 9% 22% 5% 6% 12%
hs-grad 42% 57% 56% 48% 48% 50%
bachelor 27% 25% 12% 33% 29% 25%
graduatedegree 15% 8% 4% 14% 18% 12%
Child in Household child-under18 41% 34% 41% 34% 39% 38%
Pct of Pop Age 16+ employed 62% 65% 63% 67% 68% 65%
income 0-25k 9% 5% 13% 4% 4% 7%
income 25-50k 9% 14% 24% 10% 8% 13%
income 50-75k 14% 16% 22% 9% 12% 15%
income 75-200k 45% 55% 39% 58% 56% 51%
income 200k-plus 22% 10% 2% 18% 20% 15%
single family 91% 95% 52% 89% 98% 86%
multi-family 9% 5% 48% 11% 2% 14%
rented 24% 21% 63% 16% 14% 27%
owned 76% 79% 37% 84% 86% 73%
Total population data from the 2010 Decennial Census.
Surname-based Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database.
Latino voter registration and turnout data are Spanish-surname counts adjusted using Census Population Department
undercount estimates. NH White and NH Black registration and turnout counts estimated by NDC. Citizen Voting Age Pop.,
Age, Immigration, and other demographics from the 2012-2016 American Community Survey and Special Tabulation 5-year
data.
Housing Stats
Household Income
Education (among those
age 25+)
Total Pop
City of Moorpark - Map 515
Language spoken at home
6,884
Immigration
Citizen Voting Age Pop
Age
Voter Registration (Nov
2016)
Voter Turnout (Nov
2016)
Voter Turnout (Nov
2014)
90
91
District 1 2345Total
Ideal Total Pop 7,007 6,894 6,824 6,945 6,751 34,421
Deviation from ideal 123 10 -60 61 -133 256
% Deviation 1 79% 0 15% -0 87% 0 89% -1 93% 3 72%
% Hisp 17% 30% 75% 15% 21% 31%
% NH White 68% 59% 19% 72% 67% 57%
% NH Black 2% 2% 1% 2% 2% 2%
% Asian-American 11% 8% 3% 10% 9% 8%
Total 5,042 4,982 3,312 4,912 5,229 23,476
% Hisp 11% 18% 57% 13% 19% 21%
% NH White 75% 70% 39% 73% 73% 68%
% NH Black 0% 3% 1% 3% 1% 2%
% Asian/Pac Isl 12% 8% 3% 10% 6% 8%
Total 4,456 4,848 2,499 4,594 4,175 20,573
% Latino est 32% 36% 50% 31% 35% 35%
% Spanish-Surnamed 5% 4% 3% 5% 4% 4%
% Asian-Surnamed 42% 36% 22% 44% 39% 38%
% Filipino-Surnamed 21% 23% 24% 20% 21% 22%
% NH White est 5% 6% 5% 5% 5% 5%
% NH Black 15% 22% 54% 12% 18% 22%
Total 3,759 3,976 1,845 3,958 3,518 17,056
% Latino est 32% 37% 52% 31% 36% 36%
% Spanish-Surnamed 5% 3% 4% 4% 3% 4%
% Asian-Surnamed 44% 37% 22% 46% 40% 40%
% Filipino-Surnamed 19% 21% 21% 19% 19% 20%
% NH White est 5% 6% 4% 4% 5% 5%
% NH Black 14% 22% 52% 12% 18% 20%
Total 2,329 1,795 798 2,408 2,067 9,397
% Latino est 13% 15% 46% 10% 14% 16%
% Spanish-Surnamed 12% 13% 41% 9% 13% 14%
% Asian-Surnamed 5% 3% 4% 3% 3% 4%
% Filipino-Surnamed 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1%
% NH White est 80% 80% 45% 84% 78% 78%
% NH Black est 1% 1% 0% 1% 0% 1%
ACS Pop Est Total 7,158 7,064 6,899 7,042 6,866 35,029
age0-19 25% 26% 32% 27% 25% 27%
age20-60 57% 59% 56% 57% 59% 58%
age60plus 18% 15% 12% 16% 16% 15%
immigrants 16% 14% 30% 18% 12% 18%
naturalized 57% 60% 26% 60% 49% 47%
english 76% 79% 45% 76% 81% 72%
spanish 15% 11% 50% 12% 13% 20%
asian-lang 4% 4% 3% 3% 3% 3%
other lang 5% 5% 2% 9% 2% 5%
Language Fluency Speaks Eng "Less
than Very Well"8% 9% 26% 10% 6% 12%
hs-grad 47% 57% 49% 47% 52% 50%
bachelor 30% 25% 13% 30% 26% 25%
graduatedegree 15% 8% 5% 16% 15% 12%
Child in Household child-under18 37% 34% 44% 37% 38% 38%
Pct of Pop Age 16+ employed 64% 65% 64% 66% 67% 65%
income 0-25k 6% 5% 13% 8% 6% 7%
income 25-50k 10% 14% 23% 7% 12% 13%
income 50-75k 11% 16% 21% 16% 11% 15%
income 75-200k 50% 55% 40% 51% 56% 51%
income 200k-plus 23% 10% 4% 19% 15% 15%
single family 89% 95% 65% 96% 80% 86%
multi-family 11% 5% 35% 4% 20% 14%
rented 20% 21% 56% 16% 28% 27%
owned 80% 79% 44% 84% 72% 73%
Total population data from the 2010 Decennial Census.
Surname-based Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database.
Latino voter registration and turnout data are Spanish-surname counts adjusted using Census Population Department
undercount estimates. NH White and NH Black registration and turnout counts estimated by NDC. Citizen Voting Age Pop.,
Age, Immigration, and other demographics from the 2012-2016 American Community Survey and Special Tabulation 5-year
data.
Housing Stats
Household Income
Education (among those
age 25+)
Total Pop
City of Moorpark - Map 519
Language spoken at home
6,884
Immigration
Citizen Voting Age Pop
Age
Voter Registration (Nov
2016)
Voter Turnout (Nov
2016)
Voter Turnout (Nov
2014)
92
93
District 1 2345Total
Ideal Total Pop 6,661 6,894 7,219 6,896 6,751 34,421
Deviation from ideal -223 10 335 12 -133 558
% Deviation -3 24% 0 15% 4 87% 0 17% -1 93% 8 11%
% Hisp 18% 30% 71% 16% 21% 31%
% NH White 67% 59% 23% 72% 67% 57%
% NH Black 2% 2% 1% 2% 2% 2%
% Asian-American 11% 8% 4% 9% 9% 8%
Total 4,713 4,982 3,601 4,951 5,229 23,476
% Hisp 12% 18% 51% 14% 19% 21%
% NH White 74% 70% 42% 74% 73% 68%
% NH Black 1% 3% 1% 2% 1% 2%
% Asian/Pac Isl 12% 8% 5% 9% 6% 8%
Total 4,210 4,848 2,791 4,548 4,175 20,573
% Latino est 32% 36% 48% 31% 35% 35%
% Spanish-Surnamed 6% 4% 4% 5% 4% 4%
% Asian-Surnamed 42% 36% 24% 44% 39% 38%
% Filipino-Surnamed 21% 23% 23% 20% 21% 22%
% NH White est 5% 6% 5% 5% 5% 5%
% NH Black 15% 22% 50% 12% 18% 22%
Total 3,546 3,976 2,097 3,918 3,518 17,056
% Latino est 33% 37% 49% 31% 36% 36%
% Spanish-Surnamed 5% 3% 4% 4% 3% 4%
% Asian-Surnamed 43% 37% 25% 46% 40% 40%
% Filipino-Surnamed 19% 21% 21% 19% 19% 20%
% NH White est 5% 6% 4% 4% 5% 5%
% NH Black 14% 22% 47% 12% 18% 20%
Total 2,193 1,795 942 2,400 2,067 9,397
% Latino est 13% 15% 40% 10% 14% 16%
% Spanish-Surnamed 12% 13% 36% 9% 13% 14%
% Asian-Surnamed 5% 3% 4% 3% 3% 4%
% Filipino-Surnamed 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1%
% NH White est 80% 80% 51% 84% 78% 78%
% NH Black est 1% 1% 1% 1% 0% 1%
ACS Pop Est Total 6,811 7,064 7,294 6,994 6,866 35,029
age0-19 25% 26% 32% 27% 25% 27%
age20-60 57% 59% 56% 57% 59% 58%
age60plus 18% 15% 12% 16% 16% 15%
immigrants 16% 14% 30% 17% 12% 18%
naturalized 56% 60% 28% 60% 49% 47%
english 75% 79% 46% 78% 81% 72%
spanish 15% 11% 48% 11% 13% 20%
asian-lang 4% 4% 3% 3% 3% 3%
other lang 5% 5% 3% 8% 2% 5%
Language Fluency Speaks Eng "Less
than Very Well"8% 9% 26% 9% 6% 12%
hs-grad 47% 57% 48% 47% 52% 50%
bachelor 30% 25% 14% 31% 26% 25%
graduatedegree 15% 8% 5% 16% 15% 12%
Child in Household child-under18 37% 34% 44% 37% 38% 38%
Pct of Pop Age 16+ employed 63% 65% 64% 66% 67% 65%
income 0-25k 6% 5% 13% 7% 6% 7%
income 25-50k 10% 14% 21% 8% 12% 13%
income 50-75k 11% 16% 20% 15% 11% 15%
income 75-200k 49% 55% 41% 51% 56% 51%
income 200k-plus 23% 10% 4% 19% 15% 15%
single family 88% 95% 67% 97% 80% 86%
multi-family 12% 5% 33% 3% 20% 14%
rented 20% 21% 54% 15% 28% 27%
owned 80% 79% 46% 85% 72% 73%
Total population data from the 2010 Decennial Census.
Surname-based Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database.
Latino voter registration and turnout data are Spanish-surname counts adjusted using Census Population Department
undercount estimates. NH White and NH Black registration and turnout counts estimated by NDC. Citizen Voting Age Pop.,
Age, Immigration, and other demographics from the 2012-2016 American Community Survey and Special Tabulation 5-year
data.
Housing Stats
Household Income
Education (among those
age 25+)
Total Pop
City of Moorpark - Map 520
Language spoken at home
6,884
Immigration
Citizen Voting Age Pop
Age
Voter Registration (Nov
2016)
Voter Turnout (Nov
2016)
Voter Turnout (Nov
2014)
94
Attachment 6
Correspondence received in addition to Draft Maps
12853-0027\2261170v11.doc 95
Deborah Traffenstedt
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
john w gay <outlook_C765574577F58CC8
@outlook.com>
Friday, February 01, 2019 3:19 PM
District Elections
Recommendation
I strongly support five districts for Moorpark to increase the likelihood of greater ethnic and economic diversity in City
government.
I also strongly support term limits of two, two year terms, for elected officials.
JWGay, 7328 Augusta Drive.
Sent from Mail for Windows 10
1
ATTACHMENT 6
96
Deborah Traffenstedt
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Ms. Dimberg:
Deborah Traffenstedt
Friday, February 01, 2019 2:31 PM
'Erin Dimberg'
RE: voting for maps
We are working on the staff report for the next public hearing for the District-Based Election implementation, and there
will be a map included that will show the census block location for each of the Councilmember residences on one
map . For your information, I never refused to provide a map to the person you reference in your email. I only
explained the restrictions on what type of map I coul.d provide, and that it would be provided with the staff report. The
staff report for the 2/6/19 Council meeting will be posted this evening. I'm aware that you also sent another email
today that included a few additional questions. When I have that information, I will get back to you .
Deborah Traffenstedt
Assistant City Manager
City of Moorpark I 799 Moorpark Ave. I Moorpark, CA 93021
(805) 517-6213 I fax: (805) 532-2525 I dtraffenstedt@moorparkca .gov
www.m oorparkca.gov
From: Erin Dimberg [mailt o :aqqie99cates@yahoo .com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2019 11:25 AM
To: Deborah Traffenstedt
Subject: Re: voting for maps
Hi Deborah,
I have asked online about the location of council members in proposed districts. When
the MUSD maps were release, they contained the locations of current board members. I
wondered why the City didn't provide that information for current council members?
A woman online said she reached out to you and that you are refusing to provide this
information. I am confused as to why the City would fight to keep this from the
1 97
community? You don't have to provide the address, just the general location (as MUSD
did) so that when considering maps voters can gain more insight as to why certain maps
are being supported. It would also be important on the maps in consideration to
indicate who is up for reelection in each year. That combined information could have
great impact on which maps are supported by council members and by voters.
I request the City release this information prior to the February 6th meeting.
Thanks,
Erin Dimberg
On Thursday, January 24, 2019, 7:20:01 AM PST, Erin Dimberg <aggie99cates@yahoo.com> wrote:
Good morning,
I was unable to attend the meeting last night as I had a prior commitment to attend the family fun night meeting for our school's pta.
wanted to share my thoughts though and based on posts online, this was the email we were directed to send our comments.
As the system is set up, I do not believe it is a realistic responsibility for most to take on being Mayor. The mayoral position should
be at minimum a part-time job and being compensated $7200 for that work doesn't make that a viable option for most people and is
not commensurate with the experience and knowledge we expect a Mayor to possess. Therefore, and as I have seen since I moved
here, our current mayor runs unopposed every time. We need to do something to encourage civic involvement and spur more people
to run for elected positions. If we remain with a a 4 district map and an elected Mayor, we MUST raise the Mayoral compensation to
lure in others to run.
My preferred option is the 5 district map where a Mayor is voted on between the council members. I believe that person is really a city
council member and then asked to take be the face at public events. I also like the idea that the Mayoral role would be rotated and
represent all areas of Moorpark, whereas now we have the same person year after year. I have attended multiple city events and I have
NEVER seen her. Perhaps changing to a 5 district map where someone is more likely to run opposed will encourage council members
to be more involved in the city.
In looking over the maps below are my preferences:
4 districts: 402, 407, 410 and 424
5 districts: 514
I was disappointed in the disproportionate options in maps between district numbers.
I have a question, I noticed on all maps that certain districts were never the option to vote in 2020, but were always relegated to
2022. Is there a reason for this? Do the current council members who reside in that district not come up for reelection until 2022?
Thanks so much,
Erin Dimberg
2
98
Deborah Traffenstedt
From: alex ye <alexyye@hotmail.com>
Thursday, January 31, 2019 10:50 AM
Deborah Traffenstedt
Sent:
To:
Subject: Re: Map Submittal for District Elections
Got it, thank you very much for explaining it in detail for me.
iAlYEx
On Jan 31, 2019, at 10:32 AM, Deborah Traffenstedt <DTraffenstedt@moorparkca.gov> wrote:
Mr. Ye:
You can submit a new map, but if you submit a new map now, it could not be considered at the 2/6/19
meeting, because we need to publish a new or revised map at least 7 days before the public
hearing. We will have another public hearing on 3/6/19 (with a new 7-day prior posting period);
however, per the current schedule for this District-Based Election process, the City Council
could narrow down their options to a preferred map at the 2/6/19 hearing and introduce an ordinance
for first reading with ordinance adoption to occur on 3/6/19. If they are not ready to introduce an
ordinance at the 2/6/19 meeting, that action could be postponed to an adjourned meeting or to the
regular 3/6/19 meeting, and ordinance adoption could occur at the 3/20/19 meeting. To avoid a
lawsuit, we need ordinance adoption to occur at a regular City Council meeting prior to 4/9/19.
Since I can't confirm whether any new map you submit will be considered (depending upon the City
Council's decision on 2/6/19), I suggest you might want to look at all of the other 4 District maps posted
on our website for the 3 posting dates-1/16/19, 1/18/19, and 1/30/19 and see if you want to email
comments to the City Council in support of any of those 4 District maps (that are identified as
population balanced and do not have an identified error). You could also show up at the 2/6/19 public
hearing and give your comments verbally in support of any of the 4 District maps or a preferred
variation during the public hearing.
If you have any questions, please feel free to call me, since it is difficult to explain all of the options in
writing!
Deborah Traffenstedt
Assistant City Manager
City of Moorpark I 799 Moorpark Ave. I Moorpark, CA 9:3021
(805) 517-621:3 I fax: (805) 5:32-2525 I dtraffenstedt@moorparkca.gov
www.moorparkca.gov
<imageOOl.png>
1
99
From: alex ye [mailto:alexyye@hotmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2019 9:18 AM
To: Deborah Traffenstedt
Subject: Re: Map Submittal for District Elections
You are correct! It is not contiguous. I wasn't aware that rule for such small city. I will try to
make adjustment to it if I can find time. What is the last day I can submit a new map?
Thanks
iAlYEx
On Jan 31, 2019, at 9:01 AM, Deborah Traffenstedt <DTraffenstedt@moorparkca.gov> wrote:
Mr. Ye:
I apologize for the delay in responding to your email. I did follow-up and found that
even though you submitted your original email correctly, it was accidently overlooked
by the demographer. We made a new posting of maps yesterday (see the January 30,
2019 Supplement on our City website) that includes your submittal as Map No.
426. Your draft map was found by the demographer to be not entirely contiguous,
which means it cannot be adopted. We will be posting the agenda report on Friday,
2/1/19, for the next District-Based Elections public hearing scheduled for the City
Council regular meeting on 2/6/19. You will be able to view all of the map submittals in
the 2/6/19 meeting staff report, and all of the maps are also currently posted in the
District-Based Elections section of our City
website. https://www.moorparkca.gov/799/District-Based-Elections
Thank you for your map submittal, and I again apologize for our error and hope to see
you at the next scheduled public hearing on 2/6/19, or you can watch the broadcast of
the meeting live or as recorded via our website.
Deborah Traffenstedt
Assistant City Manager
City of Moorpark I 799 Moorpark Ave. I Moorpark, CA 9:3021
(805) 517-621:3 I fax: (805) 582-2525 I dtraffenstedt@moorparkca.gov
www.moorparkca.gov
<imageOOl.png>
From: alex ye [mailto:alexyye@hotmail.com]
Sent: Friday, January 25, 2019 10:23 AM
To: Deborah Traffenstedt
Subject: Re: Map for District Elections
Hi,
I just checked Moorpark Districts website, under Draft Maps and Sequencing
Released to Public, I didn't find the district map I submitted. Also it is not in the
2
100
Powerpoint Hearing on Proposed Maps, Why? Is someone made selection before
present to public? From the math, it looks like I had the most balanced map.
iAlYEx
On Jan 7, 2019, at 9:50 AM, Deborah Traffenstedt
<DTraffenstedt@moorparkca.gov> wrote:
Mr. Ye:
Thank you for your submittal, which will be included in the public record
to be considered by the City Council as part of the District-Based
Elections process. Thanks also for pointing out the difference in the
email address. We have now made the excel file correction to
DistrictElections@moorparkca.gov,which includes NDC and City staff as
part of the group members receiving these emails.
Deborah Traffenstedt
Assistant City Manager
City of Moorpark I 799 Moorpark Ave. I Moorpark, CA 93021
(805) 517-6213 I fax: (805) 532-2525 I
dtraffenstedt@moorparkca.gov
www .moorparkca.gov
<imageOO 1. png>
From: alex ye [mailto:alexyye@hotmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, January 05, 2019 9:41 AM
To: District Elections; Moorpark@NDCresearch.com
Subject: Map for District Elections
To the City of Moorpark, District Elections,
Very interesting to do the mapping thing, never know it would be
so hard just for our small city. Excel file is attached. I also
submitted via online redistricting but don't know if it worked or
not, didn't receive confirmation.
Hope my map helps.
On Moorpark city website, it said to email map
to DistrictElections@moorparkca.gov, but in excel file it said to
email to Moorpark@NDCresearch.com ... so I email to both.
Have fun.
3
101
Deborah Traffenstedt
From: Diane Walters < iskidewl@yahoo.com >
Monday, January 28, 2019 11:26 AM
Brian Chong; Deborah Traffenstedt
Fwd: 2-1-2019 Acorn
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Oops, I mean 2-1-2019 Acom
Sent from my iPhone
Begin forwarded message:
From: Diane Walters <iskidewl@yahoo.com>
Date: January 28, 2019 at 10:52:10 AM PST
To: BChong@MoorparkCA.gov
Cc: DTraffenstedt@MoorparkCA.gov
Subject: 1-25-2019 Acorn
Would you PLEASE publish in 1-25-2019 Acom the announcement of upcoming Hearing #4.
Please include a map with stars in the general areas where Parvin, Mikos, Pollock, Simons,
Enegren live.
We saw this in the last Acom. They published MUSD selected maps with stars in the general
areas where School Board Members live.
Also include how to judge Legal maps:
Population Balanced based on 2010 Census of 34,421 residents.
Majority Minority District/s
Compact
Cohesive
Contiguous
Natural & Major Divides
Keeps Communities of Interest together
Thanks
1
102
Deborah Traffenstedt
From: Diane Walters <iskidewl@yahoo.com>
Friday, January 25, 2019 7:22 PM
Deborah Traffenstedt
Sent:
To:
Subject: Re: Map Meeting Debacle
1. Thanks, for clarifying Extension Agreement, not Settlement Agreement.
2. Lack of Communication:
I was surprised by Mikos comment that many people are emailing & calling her, that they just found out about
District Based Elections. As a result, Mikos wants to hold an extra meeting for them & Steven Kueny so more
maps can be submitted???
Really? 24 maps isn't enough to choose from???
It appears the communication is inadequate and must be improved since this ridiculous.
Therefore, I am requesting all 4 district maps being considered be published in the 2-1-19 Acom, along with
announcement of 4th meeting and the PURPOSE of that meeting.
Thanks Again!
Sent from my iPhone
On Jan 25, 2019, at 4:53 PM, Deborah Traffenstedt <DTraffenstedt@MoorparkCA.gov> wrote:
Diane,
I'm glad that you were able to attend the City Council's meeting on January 23, 2019, and I appreciated
your organized and thoughtful presentation of your map drawing suggestions. Our next public hearing
for the District-Based Election process is at the regular City Council meeting on 2/6/19, and I expect
there will be more of the specific district map drawing discussion at that next public hearing.
You requested a copy of the settlement agreement. We do not have a settlement agreement, but I
believe you are looking for an Extension Agreement (copy attached) that was approved on the City
Council's 10/11/2018 special meeting agenda, so it was made available to the public prior to execution
and is part of the agenda packet for that meeting:
https://moorpa rk.gra nicus.com/MetaViewer.php ?view id=102&clip id=2017 &meta id=l 71290.
Regarding your HOA email comment, we did email the HOA's with the District-Based Election meeting
schedule and requested distribution to their members. This isn't currently an effective way to get
information distributed, because not all HOA's have an effective email communication system. The best
1
103
way for persons to receive notice of the City's various meeting agendas is to sign up for "Notify Me" on
our City website.
Feel free to call me if I can answer any questions. Hope to see you on 2/6/19.
Deborah Traffenstedt
Assistant City Manager
City of Moorpark I 799 Moorpark Ave. I Moorpark, CA 93021
(805) 517-6213 I fax: (805) 532-2525 I dtraffenstedt@moorparkca.gov
www.moorparkca.gov
<imageOOl.png>
From: Diane Walters [mailto:iskidewl@yahoo.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2019 10:49 AM
To: Deborah Traffenstedt
Subject: Map Meeting Debacle
Dear Deborah,
RE: Settlement Agreement
Based on last's night's meeting going off the rails, I am therefore requesting you email me an actual copy of the
Settlement Agreement between City and the Plaitiffs attorney by tomorrow. And or post a copy of this
document under "Archive" on the District Map website by tomorrow. I am very concerned about Council
considering not following the Settlement Agreement timeline.
Plus Council wants to defy the law and not use the 2010 Census. This is not a guideline, it is the law. Plus the
minority majority District election must be held next year during the November 2020 Presidential Election.
The one and only Councilmember who did his job, came prepared, did his due diligence was, COUNCIL
MEMBER ENEGREN, who identified 3 District Maps he supported. He identified Map 402,412, 424.
Last night our City Council's job was to identify 3 or 4 maps each Councilmember favored, have open discussion
about these maps, then vote on 3 or 4 that would be considered at the last meeting on February 6, 2016. To his
credit, City Manager, Troy, attempted to bring the Councilmembers back to reality of the law as to how district
maps are suppose to be drawn.
The other Council members, Simons, Mikos, Pollock, and Mayor Parvin failed to do their job last night. Now,
Mikos wants another meeting as she stated many residents just found out about this. Unbelievable! City want to
make accomadation for ignorant residents who apparently are not paying attention to what's happening in the city.
That brings up another subject... the communication from city to residents. Brian Chong refuses to use Nextdoor, but
it was used indirectly yesterday through Rebecca Purcell on the Ventura County Nextdoor account. This proves the
point that the current communication can be improved.
Therefore, I am requesting city to have ALL HOA emails in Moorpark. Moorpark can send out regular emails to the
HOA Presidents and send out regular announcements of meetings, etc, HO A's can then transmit this information to
it's residents.
I can only hope at the February 6, 2019 meeting, the Council votes on one map to be our new District Map.
Thanks,
Diane
2
104
Deborah Traffenstedt
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
1/24/19
Dear Mayor & Council members,
Janet Murphy
<jmurphy3gs@yahoo.com >
Thursday, January 24, 2019 12:38 PM
Janice Parvin; David Pollock; Roseann
Mikos; Ken Simons; Chris Enegren
Valorie Flores; Deborah Traffenstedt
The Genuine Outreach Challenge
At last night's City Council -special meeting for District-Based elections, I was disappointed
in the overall public hearing process. Specifically how the meeting was framed by the one
question of deciding on a 4-district map or a 5-district map.
As I stated at the meeting, I wasn't prepared to make a choice because I came to the meeting
anticipating more discussions from the council, city staff, and the community on these two
choices; weighing the pros and cons before the decision was made. It was clear that most
speakers were well prepared to make their choice. (I was not prepared make a choice and I
do take that responsibility for that) The council's vote did reflect the majority of sp·eakers
that favored a 4-district map, but this should not be viewed as the majority voice for all of
Moorpark.
With that in mind, I feel the 4-district map with an at-Large mayor should work well for a city
of our size. And I do like the idea of getting 2 votes, as Mayor Parvin stated, one for the district
and one for the mayor. And down the line, if our city of voters doesn't like this system we can
develop a ballot initiative that would allow the voters to decide the structure.
As for choosing the final district map, I do realize that the council has to make a decision in a
timely matter to avoid paying high penalties, but still there needs to be mindful discussions
and genuine outreach.
What is genuine outreach?
1
105
When each councilperson and Mayor goes directly to the people ... yes, face-to-face, possibly
out of your comfort zones, maybe knocking on doors, but to get out there and listen to
people's opinions and suggestions. Maybe you have done this, I don't know. Do you have
other ideas of genuine outreach?
If district based elections was develop for the greater good or required by law, really doesn't
matter. The intention is to help marginalized communities within cities that have been
under-represented. If certain demographics in our area of the city feel marginalized, then it
should be your duty to reach out to individuals and/ or neighborhoods that are actually
under-represented.
We already know which areas to focus on, because of the information presented by
demographer and the tools provided on the city's website. Ifwe examine the diversity on our
current council this demographic is NOT being represented.
I challenge each of you to reach out to these communities before the next public hearing.
know Councilwoman Mikos has done this already. Last night at least two long time residents
from the Virginia Colony came because Mikos called them. They are seniors, don't have
computers, don't get the newspapers, but they vote and are a valuable part of our city. I also
talked to these ladies and I was grateful to hear their opinions and what district that they
identified with too. I was a bit surprised by their answers, and you may be too.
I know this challenge will take some time, but please give more thought on the spirit of the
law and reach out to those that may be disenfranchised and may need to be encouraged to be
part to this monumental process of essential change.
Thank you all for your efforts thus far,
Janet Murphy
15308 Seitz Court
Moorpark, CA 93021
2
106
Deborah Traffenstedt
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Dear Deborah,
RE: Settlement Agreement
Diane Walters <iskidewl@yahoo.com>
Thursday, January 24, 2019 10:49 AM
Deborah Traffenstedt
Map Meeting Debacle
Based on last's night's meeting going off the rails, I am therefore requesting you email me an actual copy of the Settlement
Agreement between City and the Plaitifrs attorney by tomorrow. And or post a copy of this document under "Archive" on the
District Map website by tomorrow. I am very concerned about Council considering not following the Settlement Agreement timeline.
Plus Council wants to defy the law and not use the 2010 Census. This is not a guideline, it is the law. Plus the minority majority
District election must be held next year during the November 2020 Presidential Election.
The one and only Councilmember who did his job, came prepared, did his due diligence was, COUNCIL MEMBER ENEGREN,
who identified 3 District Maps he supported. He identified Map 402,412, 424.
Last night our City Council's job was to identify 3 or 4 maps each Councilmember favored, have open discussion about these maps,
then vote on 3 or 4 that would be considered at the last meeting on February 6, 2016. To his credit, City Manager, Troy, attempted to
bring the Councilmembers back to reality of the law as to how district maps are suppose to be drawn.
The other Council members, Simons, Mikos, Pollock, and Mayor Parvin failed to do their job last night. Now, Mikos wants another
meeting as she stated many residents just found out about this. Unbelievable! City want to make accomadation for ignorant residents
who apparently are not paying attention to what's happening in the city.
That brings up another subject... the communication from city to residents. Brian Chong refuses to use Nextdoor, but it was used
indirectly yesterday through Rebecca Purcell on the Ventura County Nextdoor account. This proves the point that the current
communication can be improved.
Therefore, I am requesting city to have ALL HOA emails in Moorpark. Moorpark can send out regular emails to the HOA Presidents
and send out regular announcements of meetings, etc, HO A's can then transmit this information to it's residents.
I can only hope at the February 6, 2019 meeting, the Council votes on one map to be our new District Map.
Thanks,
Diane
1
107
Maureen Benson
From: Deborah Traffenstedt
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Thursday, January 24, 2019 9:06 AM
City Council & City Manager
DistrictElections@moorparkca.gov
FW: voting for maps
From: Erin Dimberg [mailto:aqqie99cates@yahoo.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2019 7:20 AM
To: Deborah Traffenstedt
Subject: voting for maps
Good morning,
I was unable to attend the meeting last night as I had a prior commitment to attend the family fun night meeting
for our school's pta. I wanted to share my thoughts though and based on posts online, this was the email we
were directed to send our comments.
As the system is set up, I do not believe it is a realistic responsibility for most to take on being Mayor. The
mayoral position should be at minimum a part-time job and being compensated $7200 for that work doesn't
make that a viable option for most people and is not commensurate with the experience and knowledge we
expect a Mayor to possess. Therefore, and as I have seen since I moved here, our current mayor runs
unopposed every time. We need to do something to encourage civic involvement and spur more people to run
for elected positions. Ifwe remain with a a 4 district map and an elected Mayor, we MUST raise the Mayoral
compensation to lure in others to run.
My preferred option is the 5 district map where a Mayor is voted on between the council members. I believe
that person is really a city council member and then asked to take be the face at public events. I also like the
idea that the Mayoral role would be rotated and represent all areas of Moorpark, whereas now we have the same
person year after year. I have attended multiple city events and I have NEVER seen her. Perhaps changing to a
5 district map where someone is more likely to run opposed will encourage council members to be more
involved in the city.
In looking over the maps below are my preferences:
4 districts: 402, 407, 410 and 424
5 districts: 514
I was disappointed in the disproportionate options in maps between district numbers.
I have a question, I noticed on all maps that certain districts were never the option to vote in 2020, but were
always relegated to 2022. Is there a reason for this? Do the current council members who reside in that district
not come up for reelection until 2022?
Thanks so much,
1
108
Erin Dimberg
2
109
Deborah Traffenstedt
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Good morning,
Erin Dimberg
< agg ie99cates@yahoo.com >
Thursday, January 24, 2019 7:20 AM
Deborah Traffenstedt
voting for maps
I was unable to attend the meeting last night as I had a prior commitment to attend the family fun night meeting
for our school's pta. I wanted to share my thoughts though and based on posts online, this was the email we
were directed to send our comments.
As the system is set up, I do not believe it is a realistic responsibility for most to take on being Mayor. The
mayoral position should be at minimum a part-time job and being compensated $7200 for that work doesn't
make that a viable option for most people and is not commensurate with the experience and knowledge we
expect a Mayor to possess. Therefore, and as I have seen since I moved here, our current mayor runs
unopposed every time. We need to do something to encourage civic involvement and spur more people to run
for elected positions. Ifwe remain with a a 4 district map and an elected Mayor, we MUST raise the Mayoral
compensation to lure in others to run.
My preferred option is the 5 district map where a Mayor is voted on between the council members. I believe
that person is really a city council member and then asked to take be the face at public events. I also like the
idea that the Mayoral role would be rotated and represent all areas of Moorpark, whereas now we have the same
person year after year. I have attended multiple city events and I have NEVER seen her. Perhaps changing to a
5 district map where someone is more likely to run opposed will encourage council members to be more
involved in the city.
In looking over the maps below are my preferences:
4 districts: 402, 407, 410 and 424
5 districts: 514
I was disappointed in the disproportionate options in maps between district numbers.
I have a question, I noticed on all maps that certain districts were never the option to vote in 2020, but were
always relegated to 2022. Is there a reason for this? Do the current council members who reside in that district
not come up for reelection until 2022?
Thanks so much,
Erin Dimberg
1
110
Maureen Benson
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
-----Original Message-----
Deborah Traffenstedt
Wednesday, January 23, 2019 4:56 PM
City Council & City Manager
DistrictElections@moorparkca.gov
FW: District Maps & Term Limits
From: Tina Graham [mailto:tnagraham@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2019 4:10 PM
To: Deborah Traffenstedt
Subject: District Maps & Term Limits
For tonight's meeting:
I support Maps 407 and 402 in that order.
I highly recommend Term Limits and district representatives living in district they represent.
Am disabled and unable to attend this evening's important meeting.
Please include my Map votes as 407 first choice and 402 second choice.
Also please address Term Limits.
We must have fresh representation in Moorpark with new Mayor and City Council Members every few
years.
City Council Members must definitely reside in the district they represent.
Yours truly,
Christina Graham
11521 Poopyglen Ct
Moorpark, CA 93021
1
111
' f
Maureen Benson
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Deborah Traffenstedt
Wednesday, January 23, 2019 2:14 PM
City Council & City Manager
DistrictElections@moorparkca.gov
FW: Public Comment for CC Public Hearing on Districting
From: Clint Harper [mailto:docharper@qmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2019 2:08 PM
To: Deborah Traffenstedt
Cc: Clint Harper; Bernardo Perez
Subject: Public Comment for CC Public Hearing on Districting
Honorable Members of the City Council,
As you are undoubtedly now aware, the subject of councilmanic districts in Moorpark is not a
new one. At least as early as January of 2006, while I was still serving on the City Council, I
was contacted and interviewed by Christopher Coates, Principle Deputy Chief, Voting Section in
the DOJ's Civil Rights Division. The Federal government's interest was simple: Moorpark
system of electing the mayor and members of the City Council resulted in "voter dilution" which
de facto deprived minority members of our community of an effective voice in city
government. The DOJ expressed a similar concern with the election of MUSD school board
members.
Although no legal action was brought by the DOJ against the City, undoubtedly due in large part
to changing priorities and politics in Washington D.C., private advocacy groups have take up the
cause of minority voter rights and won a series of legal victories which brings us to the decision
that you as counci I members now face.
I've used the online mapping tool that your consultant has provided and I've tried numerous
iterations to arrive at a councilmanic district configuration that meets a few basic
goals: 1) Minimizes gerrymandering, 2) keeps recognizable neighborhoods of the City in single
contiguous districts, 3) produces at least one councilmanic district with majority-minority
representation.
Item #3 above, undoubtedly the most important to potential litigants, turns out to be
difficult. Using a 5 district map model I was able to produce a minimally gerrymandered map
with a "downtown" district that included a 69.7°/o 11 hispanic origin" demographic, but it required
significant "voter dilution11 by including much of the new housing north of City Hall. Another
group of citizens have devised a different 5 district map with a 68.9°/o 11 hispanic origin" central
Moorpark district, but with considerable gerrymandering of the Mountain Meadows area of the
1
112
/
I community. Going to a 4 district configuration would further complicate the matter and result
in additional "voter dilution" of our minority population.
My recommendation is to use a 5 district model, rather than 4, there by returning to an
appointed mayoral position. Although not perfect, this would give the City a better chance of
prevailing in any legal challenge that focuses on dilution o~ minority voting rights. This model
would also afford the best overall local representation as nominations for appointments to City
commissions and committees would now be done by the five council members and not solely by
the mayor.
Sincerely,
Clint D. Harper, Ph.D.
former Moorpark mayor and city council member
2
113
Maureen Benson
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Deborah Traffenstedt
Wednesday, January 23, 2019 2:15 PM
City Council & City Manager
DistrictElections@moorparkca.gov
FW: 5-District map
From: DEMYAN, BOB [mailto:rd1872@att.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2019 2:06 PM
To: Deborah Traffenstedt
Subject: FW: 5-District map
I am a 35year resident of Moorpark and am requesting that my input be included in the data collected for discussion @
tonite's Special City Council meeting: I am IN FAVOR of and support the principle of a "5-District" map with NO
DIRECTLY ELECTED mayoral position.
Thank you,
Robert A. Demyan
13303 Sunnyslope Pl
Moorpark
(805) 529-5554
badlsd@pacbell.net
1
114
Maureen Benson
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Deborah Traffenstedt
Wednesday, January 23, 2019 2:15 PM
City Council & City Manager
DistrictElections@moorparkca.gov
FW: District elections
From: Bob & Linda Demyan [mailto:badlsd@pacbell.net]
Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2019 1:59 PM
To: Deborah Traffenstedt
Subject: District elections
I am a resident of Moorpark since 1982 residing at: 13303 Sunnyslope Place. I would like to voice my support
IN FAVOR of a "5-District" map with NO DIRECTLY ELECTED mayoral position.
Thank you,
Linda Demyan
1
115
Maureen Benson
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
-----Original Message-----
Deborah Traffenstedt
Wednesday, January 23, 2019 9:22 AM
City Council & City Manager
DistrictElections@moorparkca.gov
FW: 5 Districts for Moorpark
From: Ingalls Lisa [mailto:laingalls@yahoo.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2019 9:14 AM
To: Deborah Traffenstedt
Subject: 5 Districts for Moorpark
Dear Ms. Traffenstedt:
I am a current resident of Moorpark and have lived in the community for almost 15 years. I think the
move to districts for city council is a very positive change for our community.
I support a 5 district map for Moorpark without a generally elected Mayor position. Keeping a
generally elected position dilutes the purpose of a representative government for the city.
Thank you,
Lisa Ingalls
Country Club Estates
1
116
Maureen Benson
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
-----Original Message-----
Deborah Traffenstedt
Wednesday, January 23, 2019 8:38 AM
City Council & City Manager
DistrictElections@moorparkca.gov
FW: District Based Elections
From: Satyanarayan karra [mailto:satyakarra@icloud.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2019 9:22 PM
To: Deborah Traffenstedt
Subject: District Based Elections
Dear Ms Traffenstedt:
Moorpark has been my home for over 33 years and I have seen it grow I strongly feel the time has
come for a five District Map and the Mayor would rotate between the five Districts
Respectfully Submitted
Satya Karra
Sent from my iPhone
1
117
Maureen Benson
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
-----Original Message-----
Deborah Traffenstedt
Wednesday, January 23, 2019 8:37 AM
City Council & City Manager
DistrictElections@moorparkca.gov
FW: District map selection
From: Brooke Luke [mailto:ekulekoorb@yahoo.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2019 6:02 PM
To: Deborah Traffenstedt
Subject: District map selection
Please add our vote in favor of Map 422.Thank You!
Brooke and Gary Luke
1
118
Maureen Benson
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Dear City Council,
Kristine Reynolds <stampwithkristine@att.net>
Wednesday, January 23, 2019 8:26 AM
City Council & City Manager
Elected Mayor
As long time residents of Moorpark, having an elected mayor is important. The mayor needs to represent our city as a whole and not
just focused on a specific district. No one but the voters should be deciding this for us, just as we voted many years ago.
We need to retain our elected mayor as we move to having 4 voting districts.
Sincerely,
Jeff and Kristine Reynolds
12210 Willow Hill Drive
Moorpark, CA 93021
1
119
Maureen Benson
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Dear City of Moorpark:
Caleb Donner <caleb@legalwarriors.com>
Tuesday, January 22, 2019 4:55 PM
Deborah Traffenstedt
District Elections
Moorpark District Elections
I have lived in the City of Moorpark for more than 25 years.
I would like you to know that I support the 5-District Map with NO directly-elected Mayor.
I think this will give greater representation to all parts of the City and better equality throughout the City.
I hope you will give this matter the attention it deserves.
Sincerely,
J. Caleb Donner
Timberridge Road
Moorpark, CA 93021
Tel: 805-300-3220
1
120
Maureen Benson
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Marilyn Ucok <MLUcok@hotmail.com>
Tuesday, January 22, 2019 4:30 PM
DistrictElections@moorpark.gov
Map
We are writing in support of the 5 District Map with no elected mayor.
Thanks,
H.E. & Marilyn Ucok
1
121
Maureen Benson
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Deborah Traffenstedt
Tuesday, January 22, 2019 4:17 PM
City Council & City Manager
DistrictElections@moorparkca.gov
FW: Transition to District Based Elections
From: elizabeth soto [mailto:lizsoto6@qmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2019 4:13 PM
To: Deborah Traffenstedt
Subject: Transition to District Based Elections
Dear Ms. Deborah Traffenstedt -Moorpark Assistant City Manager,
My name is Elizabeth Soto, and I have been a resident of Moorpark since 1986. I support a 5-District
Map with no directly elected Mayor. I am voicing my opinion in support of this position, because I
believe it to be the most equitable representation for all the residents of Moorpark. Thank you.
Sincerely,
Elizabeth Soto
12500 Willow Hill Dr.
1
122
Maureen Benson
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Deborah Traffenstedt
Tuesday, January 22, 2019 3:45 PM
City Council & City Manager
DistrictElections@moorparkca.gov
FW: FIVE DISTRICTS
From: julie martinez [mailto:casaartearch@att.net]
Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2019 2:53 PM
To: Deborah Traffenstedt
Subject: AVE DISTRICTS
To: City Council,
I am in support of a FIVE district map with NO direct vote for a Mayor, instead a rotating Mayor.
Julie Diaz Martinez
15475 braun court
moorpark, CA
1
123
Maureen Benson
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Deborah Traffenstedt
Tuesday, January 22, 2019 3:44 PM
City Council & City Manager
DistrictElections@moorparkca.gov
FW: District-Based Elections
From: Brian Corralejo [mailto:bcorralejo@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2019 1:44 PM
To: Deborah Traffenstedt
Subject: District-Based Elections
I would like to see the existing system remain in place!
Thank you.
1
124
Deborah Traffenstedt
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Bernardo Perez
< bernardo.m.perez@gmail.com >
Monday, January 21, 2019 10:06 PM
Deborah Traffenstedt
Support for 5 Council Districts and No
Elected Mayor
I plan to attend the Public
Hearing/Special City Council
meeting on January 23 regarding
District Maps.
I am in support of transitioning to 5
city council districts and eliminating
the elected mayor. In the unlikely
event I cannot attend the meeting, I
will provide written comments in
support of my position.
Bernardo M Perez
1
125
Deborah Traffenstedt
From:
Sent:
To:
ykueny@roadrunner.com
Friday, January 18, 2019 5:07 PM
Deborah Traffenstedt
Debbie, I'm submitting a second 4 District proposal.Please forward to consultant. District #1-Areas
32,33,34,35,36,37,46,47 and 48 with population of 8,692. District #2 -Areas 25,26,27,28,29,,38,39,40,41,42,43,44 and
45 with population of 8995. District# 3 -Areas 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,15 (except the area on Charles Street and
adjoining cul de sac streets east of Spring Road; I estimate the population of Area 15 remaining in this proposed District
# 3 to be 374 ),30 and 31 with population of 8236. District# 4 -Areas 12,13,14,15 (that portion of Area 15 on Charles
Street and adjoining cul de sac streets east of Spring Road; I estimate the population in this area to be 358 ) ,
16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23 and 24 with population of 8492. Please add the following to the COMMENT section to be
shown on web site : Of the two proposals I've submitted I prefer this one because 1) the Districts are compact and
recognize the historic geographic areas of the city; and 2) the number and location of residential units completed after
2010 Census date of Aprill,2010 and projected to be completed by 2020 Census date of April 1,2020 would allow this 4
district map to be easily adjusted to recognize the added population by adding Area 31 which had no added residential
units with current estimated population of 548 to District #1 ( removed from District# 3 ) for estimated total 2020
population of 9240. District# 2 add estimated 576 people to Area # 29 for total estimated 2020 population of 9571.
District# 3 add estimated population of 790 to Area #1, add estimated population of 1504 to Areas 6,7 and 15; remove
Area 31 and place it in District# l ,and remove Areas 8 and 9 and place them in District# 4 for estimated 2020
population of 9293. District# 4 add Areas 8 and 9 plus combined estimated population increase of 170 for estimated
2020 population of 9293. Thanks, Steve Kueny.
1
126
Deborah Traffenstedt
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
City council folks,
John Allred <johnnythea2012
@yahoo.com>
Wednesday, January 16, 2019 10:29 PM
City Council & City Manager
Mayoral election process
Please consider my opposition to changing our mayoral election process.
First, I am dismayed at our having to transition to council districts. There is a very real risk of developing an "us versus
them" attitude in our city where none, to my knowledge at least, exists now. In addition this change makes it easier for
outside, potentially partisan, groups to impact our election process because each district instantly requires one fourth
the cost for paid "canvassers", ad campaigns, or political groups to impact. Having said that I understand your decision
to accept the change to districting council member seats.
Our city just didn't have the resources to fight a losing legal battle.
With that in mind it becomes even more important that the mayoral seat remain a directly elected position. It isn't hard
to imagine a scenario where one part of the city feels disenfranchised with the council's mayoral selection (or other
decisions) because council members from "other" council districts voted a certain way. We could see perceived
negative divisions of our populace based on race or wealth. These divisions do not exist NOW in Moorpark but there are
groups of agitators outside our city that profit (politically) by dividing people into groups. I believe these "agitators" are
the ones who imposed the districting of our council seats in the first place. A directly elected mayor will be able to serve
as an arbiter between any possible perception of sectarian (us versus them) feelings because he/she will be elected by
and represent the entire city rather than the council districts that voted for he/she. Things are pretty harmonious now
in Moorpark but future councils may have to make very tough decisions. The perception of "cabal" making decisions in
a smoke-filled room could materialize. We NEED a mayor that represents the entire city to maintain faith in our city
government.
For the above reasons please do not vote to change our mayoral election process.
Thank you
John Allred
11833 Harvester Street
1
127
Deborah Traffenstedt
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
mauriellol@juno.com
Wednesday, January 16, 2019 2:46 PM
City Council & City Manager
City-wide Mayor
To whom it may concern re: districting the city for elections.
I understand that there is a movement afoot to change the Mayor's election procedure from city-wide voting to
election of the Mayor by City Council members.
I AM OPPOSED TO THAT!
I want the ability to elect the person who is going to represent me and Moorpark in County-wide decisions that
will affect Moorpark.
When I'm unhappy with the mayor I want the ability to vote him/her out and not depend on City council
members who may have "an axe to grind"
I want the Mayor's office to be elected on a city-wide basis, not by City council members.
Ralph Mauriello
4241 Peersimmon St.
Moorpark, CA9302 l
805 5289-5258
mauriello l@juno.com
128
Deborah Traffenstedt
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Attachments:
To Who it May Concern:
jmurphy3gs@yahoo.com
Monday, January 14, 2019 11:20 PM
District Elections
Dawn Mortara
Four -District Map-Ver3
4 districts-V3-JMDM.xlsx; FOUR DIST MAP
VER 3-JMDM.pdf
This is email 5 of 5 emailsto show the FIFTH of five maps we have created to provide a number of viable
options for Moorpark Districts for consideration and the THIRD (and last) of those for four districts.
Attached is the excel spreadsheet with the figures along with a visual hand drawn map.
This is a map for FOUR district IS balanced, at 6.66% according to the map tool in the excel spreadsheet.
This was accomplished (compared to version 2) primarily by adding all of ID area 15 to district 3 (from
district 1, and splitting up Serenta so that part of it is in District 2 and part in District 4 instead of all in
District 2, and moving ID area 48 from District 4 to District 1. All of this can certainly be debated, as we
have said before, but at least this gives different options.
If you have any questions please contact Janet at 805-587-1414 or jmurphy3gs@yahoo.com
Thank you for your efforts!
Janet Murphy
Dawn Mortara
1
129
City of Moorpark 2018 D istricti ng
P opulation U nit ID Numbers
.r •
, , ,
-... -
,
¥ ,
I .
... -
..
---.... --.. .
3
.,,, -
ti
"' ..
"" .... +
32
.. ..
-...
34
...
I '* "
......... ..
\
.... .. ..
4
"
35
" ...
. -s
ll 36 ,.I • ... .,,, ,
Four -d istrict map, version 3-JMDM
17
....
18 --
23
,. ,
..., -,,,;
.. ... .. ,_ .... -.. ,_ 1:. ..... •It It .. ,,.,,.,,,.... ... ...
--~I; ... ' 1 22 ..
~ ,_
Use thi s m:ip with the
Microsoft Excel kit
supplement.
, , ,
..
,., ~ --..
J
Au 011liuc v e r sion of this m<tp that
allows HJLI to zoom i11 and o ut for
more detail i s antilabk as •I liuk
from th e CitY \vc h s itc .
Map lay ers
.,,, ,
"
Ccn ·us Block
l.a 11dmark Arca
l'ipdim·/ l'o\\"cr Linc
lbiJr.,;o<l
Hi\ er
\\';itl·r ,\ l'\."ot
... ,. •, l'o pl 11i1,
I
I
' ' ,
""
130
Sums b y Dis trict Assigned Ideal population: 8,605
City of Moorpark 2018 Public Participatio n Kit
Janet Murphy and Dawn Mortacr;i
Counts Percentages
Group Category 1 2 I 3 I 4 Unassigned Total 1 2 3 I 4 Unassigned Total
~~~or_. ____ 8,477 8,331 -~'.~~~j 8,591 118 34,421 ~---+ ----------------·--
De,·iation from
ld ~al -128 -274 299 I -14 573 -1 O·o -3° 0 3010 0° o 6.66°0
Total 1-li ~p 1,413 2,204 5,892 1,294 17° 0 ~00
Population 10 10,813 26°'0 15°'0 8° o 31°'0
~ ----
NI-IWht 5,877 5,011 2,400 6,277 89 19,654 60°0 27°·0 73° 0 75°'o 57°'0
NII Blk 149 175 140 ! 136 0 600 2° 0
I
20 '0 I 2°10 ?0 '
I
-0
NI-1 1r\sn 872 831 376 742 19 2,840 10°0 4° 0 9010 16° 0 go 'o
Total CVA P 6,273 5,917 4,865 ~ 111 23,476
----Itlsp ----'--------
810 929 2,327 894 10 4,970 13° 0 16°'o 48°'0 14°'0 3010 21°'o
Citizen \I oting 2,213 I
~
NI-I Win 4,773 4,110 4,704 91 15,951 76°0 69°0 47°0 75° 0 77°'o 68° 0
r\ge Population ---------------~r ~:---~ ----
N il Blk 28 186 35
I
124 0 373 0010 ?0 ' -0
---f -I ------+-------
NI-I t\sn 593 578 185 537 10 1,904 9° 0 10°0 4°0 9°'o 9•·0 3•·0 I
f Total Reg. 5,506 ~5,706 H ·~~ I 5,686 86 20,573 -h-1------~10 -= 1-------- -------
Nov. 2016 794 1,212 ,740 674 8 4,427 14°·0 -2 1° 0 -48° 0 12° 0 -6°'o 22°'0
~1n--m p s4 ----->-------
Regi stration As ian -t\1nerican 259 4 883 5° 0 4°'o 4°·o 4° 0 30 '0 4°'o
l 'T r.-----------
11 .1111110 53 71 35 so 1 209 1°to 1° 0 1 o,o 1 Oto 1010 1°'o
Total Voters 4,649 4,706 2,721 ! 4,906 73 17,056 I - - -----------
1,211 I s87 Nov. 2016 La~no 645 976 7 3,485 14°'0 21°10 47° 0 12° 0 6° 0 20°·0
--------·
Voters r\sian-r\lmerican 205 174 1 06 ~ 3 693 40 10 4° 0 4° 0 ~ 400 2° 0 4°'o -
Fili pino
-----------
45 54 25 41 1 165 1° o 1°10 1°10 1° 0 1°'o 1°10
Submitter's Comments about the plan:
I dunk du:-. nrnp m ake!'i ~c n ~t· bt ca ust· ... Tht.: ln crJ ll go .ti ~iln .. -,,J~ mc.·nuoncJ (''hen J1:-.cu:-.~111g 5 <lblrtCi:-> anJ ,tbo\ e) o f ha \ mg L'ach Jbtr1ct touch J .. \ , \\ L', t he.: , \rro) o , anJ ~UlllL' p.Lrl of ~t rn a.111 bu~mc s~ J1 ~1nc1 i:. ~u ll p a rt of du s anJ
b honon:J b) 1h1 ~ \enaon , a:; \\d i.
1"111 ,: 1> ,, rn ,1p for H JU R J1 $1nc1> ,1mJ IS ba~-inccJ , a l 6 .66° o ,1ccorJ111 g w ilw map 1001111 1hc c~cd >prcaJ,hccl.
131
Deborah Traffenstedt
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Attachments:
To whom it may concern:
j mu rphy3gs@yahoo.com
Monday, January 14, 2019 11:14 PM
District Elections
Dawn Mortara
Four-District Map-Ver2
FOUR DIST MAP VER 2-JMDM.pdf; 4
districts-V2-JM DM.xlsx
This is email 4 of 5 emails to show the FOUR TH of five maps we have created to provide a number of viable options for Moorpark
Districts for consideration and the SECOND of those for four districts.
Attached is the excel spreadsheet with the figures along with a visual hand drawn map.
This is a map for FOUR districts and IS balanced, at 4.61 % according to the map tool in the excel spreadsheet.
This was accomplished (compared to version 1) primarily by taking OUT all of Moorpark Highlands (ID areas 6-8) and instead
putting those there areas in District 1,splitting up Serenta so that part of it is in District 2 and part in District 4 instead of all in District
2, and adding area 31 to District 4 instead of in District I. All of this can certainly be debated, as we have said before, but at least this
gives different options.
If you have any questions please contact Janet at 805-587-1414
Thank you again,
Janet Murphy
Dawn Mortara
1 132
City of Moorpark 201 8 Districting
P opulation Unit ID N urnbers
" " #
.. -.. ,,. -
....
..
• r..a -'--
1
! i\"l ~J I h,r ill
32
,. -\ .. -... .. ..
45
L • • "'r
I 43
1 r. ,.. I
b ~ ..II ~ 42 i-, 34 + "'""~ .. .. "' .
"' ..
f .. ---.. -.. ........... -
7
NI r·
f
'
•
I-....... - -
..,,, .. " ...
' ' '
...
Fou r -district map, version 2-JMDM
18
..
'
"
19
....
_ .. ,_ ...... -..
I.... ~ ..... IC ''· ~... .. ..
... ...
2 2 .... .. ...
UsL' thi s map w ith the
M icro so ft Excel I.it
s uppkme111 .
A ll o nline ve rsion oft hi s map that
a l.l o w s ~ ou to zoom in a nd out for
m u rc d e tail i s a va ila bic :is :1 link
rr()]n the City we b s it e
•.1 I .. '1 •!1".
M:1 p lay ers
C1:11 >'11 : Bloek
La 11 d111:1 rl. Area
P i1w li n ,·/l'mH·r Li 11 e
fl .ti I road
~l t't:1.:I '->
\\ :11 l r Ar,·a
,-.,. -, l'o p l n il:-.
"
133
Sums b y D is trict A ss igne d Ideal p o pulatio n : 8,605
City o f Moorpark 2018 Public Participatio n Kit
Jane t Murphy and D awn Morrara
Co unts Percentages
Gro up C a tegory 1 I 2 3 ! 4 Unassigned Total 1 2 I 3 I 4 Unassigned Total
~~?e:___ ~6 7 2 8,731 8,334 8,684 0 34,42 1
----·-L.-__ __ -----
l___ ---
Deviation fro m 67 126 -27 1 79 Ideal 397 1 0 10 JO"o -3° 0 JO'o 4.61 °0
T o tal 1,3 19 2,235 5,843 Po pulaci o n I-li sp 1,4 16 0
__!:!I-I Wht 6,013 5,331 1,989 6,321 0
N H Blk 156 173 130 14 1 0 ---
NH As n 1,007 884 29 1 658 0
10,813 15010 26 ° 0 10°·. 16°10
~--
19,654 69° 6 6 1°'0 24010 73 °10
I
~ 2•'.'._
-
600 2° 0 2° o
2,840 12°0 10" 0 3° 0 8° 0
31 °10
3 0 10
I Total C VAP 6,474 6,204 4,470 6,328 0
I-li sp 696 942 2,354 977 0
Citi zen Vo cing -~~ +.t ~~ 1,943 4,737 0 Age Po pulatio n ------
Ni l Blk 208 35 105 0 -
N I I Asn 623 102 455 0
23,476 ----· ----+--·-'----
4 970 I I 0 o 15° o 53% 15° o , -------!-----+-----·
15,951 -~ -10°·. 43°0 75°'o _
373 0°·o 3° 0 1° 0 2° 0
2°0 7° 0
2 1°0
68°·0 ----
2 0'0
8° 0 10° 0 1,904 11 ° 0
Total Rel(. 5,578 5,9 ~ 3,162 5,885 0
I Lattnu
----
No l'. 20 16 752 1,2 12 1,6 61 802 0 I Asta~-Ame n ~an ---·-----
Registratio n 291 239 IOI 252 u ------
Filipino 53 75 32 49 ()
22°'0
4°u
20,573 ----t~ 4,42 7 _ ~0 o ___ 2Uuo 53~-
883 5° 0 4° IJ 3°10
'-· ----1-------
209 l0 o J0 u J0 o
4° 0
1° o
l T o tal Vo ters 4,7 13 4,923 2,364 5,055 0
1---1--·-----
NO\·. 2016 ~,a ti n o 6 10 98 1 1,208 687 0 ·----
Voters :=_~merican 230 179 80 203 0 -----
"ilipino 45 58 23 39 0
20°10
4° 0
Submitter's Comments abou t th e p lan:
I 1h1nk th1:-m .1p nukes se ns..: lx:c;.H1 sc:
hu n Dn·d b\ this ' Lf"Stun, as \\ell.
'llll' o\ cr,111gl1.il .ilrL<1J\' rl1L'lllh.mt.·d (\\ h1.::11 d1 scus:img 5 d1 s tncb .111d a bun.·) llf h,n 111g c..ic h d1 s 1nc1 luuch J •• \ ,\\ c, 1h1.· . \rru~u , .t nJ :so me p .11'1 u f a m a111 bu:-;111css d1 s tnc t is !\1111 p;_irt of 1h1 s ,111d 1s
Jl11 s 1s a m .tp for H )LJlt dtstnu ~ and IS b.tl.111ct,.;J, .11 4 (i I''., .u.:corJ111g tu th t 1n.1p t uol 111 1he ..::'I.Cd :-;prt .td!oiht·1..•t.
134
Deborah Traffenstedt
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Attachments:
To Whom this may concern:
jmurphy3gs@yahoo.com
Monday, January 14, 2019 11:07 PM
District Elections
Dawn Mortara
Four-District Map-Verl
4 districts-Vl-JMDM.xlsx; FOUR DIST MAP
VER 1-JMDM.pdf
This is email 3 of 5 emails to show the THIRD of five maps we have created to provide a number of viable options for Moorpark
Districts for consideration and the first of those for four districts.
Attached is the excel spreadsheet with the figures along with a visual hand drawn map.
This is a map for FOUR districts, and was our first FOUR-district attempt. It is NOT balanced, but is almostbalanced with 10.56%
according to the map tool in the excel spreadsheet.
A couple of suggestions on how we might balance this map are as follows:
• Maybe put PART of ID area 15 (only the southern part of that) into District 3 instead of District 2 since includes historically
more of a downtown area than does Moorpark Highlands itself, which (Mpk Highlands) is the lion's share of ID area 15. Can explain
more later if necessary. This lower, southern portion of 15, includes older neighborhoods than does Moorpark Highlands and also
includes some rural areas off of Princeton Ave. that have long time residents or at least the homes there are from longer ago, by far,
than are the Highlands homes.
• Move area ID 48 in Mt. Meadows (the Willows area streets) to District 1 instead of District 4, to try to balance it out.]
Have no idea yet of that would work but it is a suggestion worth considering. Given the tools provided, it is impossible to know.
If you have any questions, please contact Janet Murphy at 805-587-1414 or jmurphy3gs@yahoo.com
Thank you for your time,
Janet Murphy
Dawn Mortara
1
135
City of Moorp ·uk 2018 Dis tricting
Population Unit ID Numbers
f
.; ,. ,.
f ..
,
32
I .; .. _,,. ---.. -
3.) .. . ,. .. -
•'tA -..... ___ _
L • -"'r
• 43
I n ..... I
t i .J ~ 42 l-4
, 4 .J..
Ii
35
I!
.I
... -""" i.a. -..
45
-!4
.f
'
..
..
' ...,.,
# '\
\
~
..
\
Fou r-district map, version 2-JMDM
.,. .. • • M '" .,. ,,.. ..., •r •
,.
9
0 18 ,
23
,. ,.
.... ..
-
...... #_ ............ ""
I ...... 'It.: 'I· ... .. ,. .. .. ... -22
' ....
U se thi s map with the
J\licro s nft Excel ki 1
:rn ppkmcnt.
A n onJine version of thi s m ap that
a lJows \·o u t0 zoom in and out for
more d e t ail i s available as a link
frqm the Ci t y websi te .
.Map layers
Ce n s u s Block
Landn1ark Ari:a
Pi pdine/l'mwr Line
l{ailroad
fti,«·r
\\ :11n A rca
136
Group
Total
Popula ti o n
C iti ze n Voting
,\ge P o pul ation
N o v. 2 lJl 6
Regis tration
ov. 20 16
Vo re r s
Ide al popula t io n :
. ublic P arti ci p a ti o n Kit
Murphy and Dawn Mortara
Counts
Category 1 I 2 I 3 4
Tot. Po p . 8,6 72 8,7 31 8,334 8,684 --
D ev i a rio n fro m 67 126 -2 7 1 79 Id ea l
---------t-------
--! Li.:T__ l ,3 19 2,235 5,843 1,4 16
------f---~-
8,605
Unassigned
()
-----
0 --
N J! W hr 6,0 13 5,33 1 l ,982.__ -6 ,32 1 -()
------· ----N !fl3lk 156 173 l 30 14 1 0 ---------N J I t\sn l ,00 7 884 29 1 658 0
Tora! CV 1\P 6,474 6,20 4 4,470 6,328 0
-·----· -·---
I !i s_E__ _ 696 942 2,354 977 () -------·-----
N ll W hr 4,954 4,3 17 1,943 4,73 7 lJ
----~ ---------
1-1 Blk 25 208 35 I 05 lJ
----------,____ ---------
N !!r\sn 724 623 102 455 0
·1 ~ira l Reg. 5,57 8 5,'J4 7 3,162 5,885 () ---·---· -
J ,a tin o 752 1,212 l ,661 80 2 ()
-------·--------
r\ sia n -r\ m e ri ca n 29 1 239 lUl 252 lJ -------·--------~-----
l ,.ilipin o 53 75 32 4 9 u
T o tal Vo ters -4 ,7 13_ ~4,923 2,36'!-_ ~,055 0 ------
La tin o 6 10 98 1 1,208 687 0 -··-----------------
1\sia n -Am e ri ca n 230 17 9 80 203 ()
Percentages
Total 1 I 2 I 3 I 4 Unassigned Total
34,42 1 -;-
39 7 l 'Yu 1% -3°111 l 0/u 4.61°0
-·----------. ___ ---
10 ,8 13 15% 26°10 70 % 16 % 3 1% --------------
19,6 54 69 % 6 1% 24% 73 % 57 °/i , ---------·-------
600 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% ---------- -
2 ,840 12% 10% 3% 8% 8%
23 ,4 76 -----------
4 ,9 70 11 "1 11 15°111 53 % 15% 2 1 u u
----r---f--------
15,95 1 77 ° u 70 % 4 .)% 7 5% (18° u -----~---~ --. --
3 73 U" u 3°111 I "1 u 2°1u 2°1u ---------f-----t---------
l ,904 11 "1 u lU % 2% 7% 8°/u
2 0,5 73 --4--- --
4 ,4 27 13°/u 20 % 53 % 14 % 22°u -->------·· ·--... -
883 5°10 4°/u 3°u 4% 4% ---------------
209 1% 1% 1% 1% I 0 u .
17 ,05 6 -------· ---
3,4 85 13 " u 20% 51% 14 % 20% ---------·-------
693 5% 4 % 3% 4% 4°/11 . -------t------
hlipino 45 58 23 39 0 165 1% 1% I 0 u 1%
Submitte r's Comme nts abo ut the pla n:
I th ink thi s m a p m a kes se n se b eca u se .... The overaU goa l alrea d y m e nti o ne d (wh e n disc u ss ing 5 di stri c ts and a b ove) of h avin g eac h dis tri ct ro uch L\ Ave, th e ;\rro yo,
and som e p art o f a m ain busin ess di stri ct is stiU p art of this a n d is h o no re d b y thi s ve r sio n , as w ell
T hi s is a m ap for FOU R dis tri cts and I S ba la n ced , at 4 .6 1% acco rdin g to the m ap too l in th e excel sprea d sh eet.
1%
137
Deborah Traffenstedt
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Attachments:
To whom to may concern:
jmurphy3gs@yahoo.com
Monday, January 14, 2019 10:42 PM
District Elections
Dawn Mortara
District 5 MAP VER 2 -JmDm
FIVE DIST MAP VER 2-JMDM.pdf; 5
districts-V2-J M DM.xlsx
This is email 2 of 5 emails to show the second of five maps we have created to provide a number of viable options for Moorpark
Districts for consideration.
Attached is the excel spreadsheet with the figures along with a visual hand drawn map.
This is a map for five districts, and was edited from our first five-district attempt. It is balanced with 8 .11 % according to the map tool
in the excel spreadsheet. In prior version 1, since we did NOT like that ID area 38 could not be included with district 4 on this map,
we attempted to do something to correct this, given the fixed nature of the ID groups that are currently available to us. We included
ID area 38 in District 4 on this map but took out Area 27 from District4 and instead put ID area 27 into District 3. In order to balance
the numbers, we need to take something out of District 3 (from version 1), so we changed ID area 2 from the prior District 3 to be part
of District 1 on this map. This makes sense because of the proximity to more rural areas of Moorpark for ID area 2 off Casey Rd. and
in the foothills with little population next to Walnut Canyon School and the Civic Center Complex.]
If you have any questions please contact Janet at 805-587-1414 or jmurohy3gs@yahoo.com
Thank you again,
Janet Murphy
Dawn Mortara
1 138
City of Moorpark 20 18 Districting
P opulation Unit ID Numbers
- - - - - --- -.. - -Y.11 -
..
f
I
#
~
#
#·
I
I
,
'·
/.
./ /
,.·
'l
. -.------~~ ' I ,..,;'*.
I 1 ,il'i ~i . .'f1 l "lf1 .l ll l I Jlt/Jlr r. • ~-1 : Ii!
...... ,,,.. ...
" I
r
I
,,;; ..
G ~if ~a 1~DrJ. ~~rt 'l!.
'
3
' l
-.. ,,
[o
.. ... ...
.... ...
....
32
34
.. ..
f
l
.....
I
I
..
..,.. "I
3
I '
#
• .. "' .. ..
4
' ' .. • I ,
' ,., ,,
\
42
11.
4
,L
--. --.. -
6
44
.. f"' , 39 .. \
40 .. .• .., ...
38
•I ...... ...
'
Five-district map, version 2-JMDM
... _. __ -..... ---;1-
17
6
18
23 .. ..
...
' " ,\a
_ .......... ,.. ... -"'."' -
-..
20
, , , ,
• .. .... "' 't .,,,,.;-... -... ... ...... -" .. .... Q .. .,. ... ,.. -21 ~
' 22
Use t his m a p \\'ith th e
l\'licroso ft E:-.n·I ki t
s upple m e n t .
An o nlin c vcrsi u 11 o f thi s m ~tp th a 1
a llo ws v ou w z o om in a nd o u t for
m o re ckta il is a Ya ilab lc as a link
from the City \Yc h s itc.
M a p lay e rs
Ci:n sus Bl ock
La ndnwrk Arc:t
l'ipc lin c/ P mn:r L im·
IL1 ilrn a d
Hin·r
Stn..'.C l S
\\'a t l'•· t\rl'a
I .. 1 l'n pl n its
139
Sums by District Assigned Ideal population: 6,884
City of Moorpark 2018 Public Participation Kit
Jant:t A/urphy and Dawn Afortara
Counts Percentages
Group Category 3 4 5 Unassigned Total 2 3 4 Unassigned Total t Toi Po p. 6,661 6,894 7,219 6,8~ ~5~ __ 6 ,7~-34,421 -~--f----Dcv1a11on fro m
Ideal -22'.' HJ 335 12 -133 558 -3°u tJ"'" 5u., (~"u -2°'u R.11°1;1
T o tal --~----~--~-
Po pulatJo n Hisp 1,170 2,046 5,t1)7 1,069 1,431 1,431 10,813 18°'u 30°11 71"1u 16uu 21 °0 21 °11 31°10 -------·-
NHWh1 4,465 4,035 1,663 4,964 4,527 4,527 19,654 __ 67°10 l 59u u 23°u 7'2:''u 67 °'u 670/u 57% ·----
NH Blk 132 139 99 106 124 124 600 ?''u I 2°0 '"" 2°u 2"'u 2"" 2%
NH Asn 758 582 289 634 577 577 2,8.io ll0 'o s•. 4°0 9•. 9•. 9°0 8°10
Total CVAP 4,713 4,982 3,601 4,~ ~.229 -5,229 23,476 ------------
I-lisp 555 875 1,842 697 1,000 1,000 4 ,970 12°u 18°0 Sl"'u l-4 °'u 19% 15°u 21°10
Citizen Voting
NHWh1 3,499 3,466 1,521 3,642 3,823 3,823 15,951 7-1-0 0 71f u -42% 7-l-0 u 73u., 57°0 68°1u Age Populatio n ---------
NH B\k 25 155 42 115 36 36 373 l 0 'u 3"" 1°'o 2"'u l "o 1°u 2°'0
I------
NH Asn 574 381 163 462 323 323 1,904 12°'u 8"" 51110 9°10 6°'u 5 010 8°'o
~talReJ<. 4,21U 4,848 2,791 4,5~ _4,175 4,175 20,573 --------------
Nuv. 2016 Latino 635 1,08 1 1,384 563 765 765 4 ,427 !5°u 22°n Stl"~. l2''U 18"" II " .. 22°'i.
Regisrratto n --------------I------
As1an -Amencan 233 184 IUU 207 160 1611 883 6°10 4"" 4"" 5"" -JUu 2"" 4"" -----,___ ------------
l;1lip1no 39 61 25 51 33 33 2U9 I"" I" .. I"" !0 'u !" .. ll"o l"o
T o tal Voters 3,546 3,976 2,lm 3,918 3,518 3 ,518 17,056 ~,. --,,. t '"'---r----------
Nu\'. 2016 La lin o 5ll'J 866 995 486 629 629 3,485 )-JUu --u u -u l8°'u 9°'u 2tJ'>'u
Voters
1--------------r--· -
As1an -Amencan 186 135 80 17 1 122 122 693 5°u 3°0 _,JU U -J0 10 3"" zu1u _,JUIU --~---------
Filipino 33 4 7 19 42 25 25 1(>5 I"" 1 0 10 i 1 00 1uu I I"" lJ'>'o )Ulu
Submitter's Comments about the plan:
I dunk 1h1 ... mar ma kc., 'UhL lx:cau~· u f th e. 'o<lnll: m.un fl:d ,llll !'> .t., llUI \'c(')Ulll I fl\c J1 ... 1nC1 mar .. 11 fl\i.: J1 3lf1 Ch CoOlll 'C I It • I .r\ ,.h t', ,\rn au ~11111 , .t nJ nu1o r bu!'>lll Clt:!I (UllLr., 1\b.o, commun1l1i.:~ o l 1111 cn:~I n :tko l11 ... 1oru.:a l trcnJ ... Ill f\ltJt)'l),lrk ~111(,;c,.
1n co1r'l11ra11on, ,b J1J \'c r ~11111 I 11 1 fi\ c J1 :-.m c 1 nup 1 lm \l.\ ~·r 1111'~ \er 10 11 11:. ~l1 g hil) ad 1u ~1ul fn 11n \ cr-.11>ll I to rdlL·c 1 .t \H) 10 1nclmh.• PupuLHHHl 11 ) an.:a 'lH \\1th Pt.:ac h I Jdl /~tcc pl c If 111 arc..-a uf w wn !'>lllCl.' \\C a!:>kc.:J people \\ho Inc 1h i.:rc anJ th1.:\ 3a 1J
1h L~ c~J113 1Jcr 1ht.:m ,chc !'> n1 ort.: part 11 1l>c.tch 11111 th an f\11 f\lc.1Jt1\\!'I, \\l1 1.:n.: Vcr.,1011 I map h aJ th c m Plca.,c.. rt.-.1 J tht.: \c r"l Hl I t.:\pl.uia 11o n f\>f thi.: IL°'I o i 1h1.: 111fl 1, ale mg \\It h 1hc 1.:m.i 1l 1ha1 accompan 1L·J 1h1 ~ ~ubm 111a l
140
Deborah Traffenstedt
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Attachments:
To whom to may concern:
jmurphy3gs@yahoo.com
Monday, January 14, 2019 10:29 PM
District Elections
Dawn Mortara
Five-District Map-Verl
FIVE-DIST MAP VER 1-JMDM.pdf;
Sdistricts-Vl-JMDM.xlsx
This is email l of 5 emails to show the first of five maps we have created to provide a number of viable options for Moorpark Districts
for consideration. Attached is the excel spreadsheet with the figures along with a visual hand drawn map. We ultimately show two
five-district maps and three four-district maps. We have not chosen any one map yet that would be our preferred alternative. Rather,
we have tried to be true to historical Moorpark, since incorporation, in thinking of communities of interest and in adjusting
accordingly to try to make the numbers work and to include the newer neighborhoods that have come to Moorpark in recent
years. We hope these options will stimulate debate of these and all other options presented by others who have undertaken this task.
This is a map for five districts, and was our first five-district attempt. It is balanced with 2.66% according to the map tool in the excel
spreadsheet. We do not like that ID area 38 could not be included with district 4 on this map. Perhaps if ID area 26 was broken into its
two natural areas (one south to include ONLY the homes near Tierra Rejada and the vernal pool) and the other to include the other
housing east of Miller Parkway but north of the water tank, all the way to LA ave., then we could adjust to allow 38 to be with District
4 and 26 north to be with District 2 while 26 south could stay in district 4.]
If you have any questions about our suggestions please call Janet at 805-587-1414 or email
jmurphy3 gs@yahoo.com
Thank you for your efforts,
Janet Murphy
Dawn Mortara
1 141
City of Moorpark 201 8 Districting
Population Unit ID N uni.hers , ---.. -~....._~---__....,,
I
I
I , , ,
!
I
' (
I
.f
~ ., ) ,
UY
"
,,
....... ..... .... ... ... ... 4
3
._,1.n 1• ..,. ""' I M
• t -.-.... ( 31 r ..... ·@'" I 32 "' • r
I ·I ' ~ 46 • I ,
·ii\ ""' 1t# .... ..., .; -• .. ... .. ,, , -.; ' " 48 I 47 --.. "f -, , ... .. ... .. c-1 1.,. --,, 34 "'
, , ..
~ , '"'-I ' .. ... 35 ' ' -; ..
ll ' 36 ... ... • ,I ..
I .. ...
33 '"' ,
l 37 ----... -. --,.
I
!
' ,,
' 6
44
•r'·'~
• 39 ~.
I 3,·•
I .........
• • ... .,,
Five-district map, version 1-JMDM
... .. ..
23
8
..
, ....
.. • I •
l
' , .. .. .~ .. ... .... ..
' 20
, , ,
~
' __ .. , ............... ....,
.... ~~ft( '•.r" ......... --8 -) 21 , .. .,; ~. ... -' • 22 ,_ ,,, ,...
--.._';!# '
Use thi s map with t hl'
f\licrosoft Excel kir
s upplem e nt.
An o nliue version of this map that
,dJow s \·ou to zoom in an<l out for
more derail is m ·ailable as a link
from th e C it\· website .
Ma p layers
Census Hl•><.:k
Landmark Arl'a
l'ipdi11.:/ l'o\\·c-r Lin<·
Hailrnacl
l{in·r
~lfl"l'IS
\\ .lll'f ,\rl",I
I•••, l'npl 11i is
142
Sums by D istri ct Ass igned Ide al po pula ti o n : 6,884
Ci ty o f Moorpark 20 18 P u blic Partic ipation Kit
Jane t Murph) and Dawn Murrara
Counts Percentages
Gro up Cat egory 3 Unassigned Tot a l 2 3 4 U n assign ed Tot a l
To t. Poe. 7,IM17 6,894 6,824 6,945 6 ,315 6,75 1 34,421 I I
Denanon from 123 lU -60 61 -569 183 2"" :·~ ,::j ~ ,~.:. : _go r0 2.6611 0 Ideal
T o tal 1,159 2,046 5,130 1,047 1.n2 1,431 17°0 2?-l 'o Po pulatio n I-lisp 10,813 2 1°0 31 °0
NH\Vht 4,767 4 ,035 1,324 5,001 4,193 4,527 19,654 68°0 59 °u l9°u 7'1:1o 66°10 67°0 57u'u -
NH Blk 132 139 88 117 121 124 600 __!_u __ ~-~-!0 u 2°u 2"" 2"" 2°u
1---·-----------Ju:I .;p;-NH Asn 795 582 213 673 541 577 2,8-IO 11 °0 8°u 9010 9010 8""
TotalCVJ\P 5,042j_ 4,982 3,312 4,912 ~?12 _ 5,229 23,476 ----------
I-lisp 556 875 1,877 661 958 1,000 4,970 )J O'u l8°u 57°u 13°0 19°0 15°0 21 °0
Ctt1zcn Votmg
Nl-IWht 3,802 3,466 1,289 3,571 3,579 3,823 15,95 1 75°0 7lf' 0 39°0 73°0 730 10 57°0 68°'u Age Populatio n ----------
NH Blk 25 155 24 133 33 36 373 !l"o 3°0 }\'iu 3°0 l 0 'o J U10 2°'u
NII J\s n 600 381 93 506 299 323 1,904 12°u 8"" 3"o l lf'o 6"" 5°10 g o 10
~ Total Reg. 4 ,456 4 ,848 2,499 4,594 3,767 4,175 20,573 ------~-
N o ,·. 2016 ~M O 664 l,U81 1,353_ 565 723 765 4,427 15010 22°u 54°'u
12"" I 19°u II "" 22°'u ---------Registration Amcnc~ 242 184 85 2 12 142 160 883 511 0 4"" 301J 5"" 4"" 2"" ..j.U IU ____ ..___ ---
1pino 4 1 61 21 53 32 33 209 I"" 1°0 I"" I"" I"'" lt-'o I"'"
Total Voters 3,?~ ~~ -·~s___ 3,958 1-~·164 __ 3,5 18 17,056 ---1 N o v. 2tl l 6 l .a tino 535 866 967 489 591 629 3,485 14% 22°0 52°'u 12°0 19°u 9u., 2l1°1u -----17Sllu8 -
~
V o ters Asian-Amcncan 19 3 135 68 122 693 5°u -~:;-i-~:: --4"" 3°0 2"o -Jltlu ---------f----~ -f----
Filip mo 35 47 16 43 25 25 165 l "u 1°0 I o~J ti"" I o~,
Su bmitter's Commen ts about the p lan:
I rh111J.. il11, rn.t p make~ "4.:n ~c l:x :ca u '4.:. '\II ; d 1 ,tn c 1 ~ h.nc !1011\c I \ \n .. conncc 11u n , ~om t.: cun1h.:c.11o n 1t1 A rron> '\um, a nJ a cun n1..·c t1or1 to 'om 1..· rna 1ur bu.!l lfll'"' c uHu m to\\ n , :>O ml· bigger crn11lc U1 o n 1h:Ln 01 h1..•r, (10 bu:>m e"M:'), b u1 a ll ha\C S ( )~ti
bu!111U.:~s Crn llll;C IJOll 1 li rcc u l rn c d1 !1lnCb ha\ c MHlll: Cu1lflCC t1 u n tu I 11 •. rr.t llq.uLt Rd '\\ h1 c lt I~ ..... ma n ~ .1 ~ cou lJ lx l:'Jl CCh.!d W' e n tithe r c 1n ~u,~raph ) I \\0 (m a} Ix lilfce) J 1~1nCh li a\c COllllCC l ll Ul to I It Vall e} 1-,.-rcc nbd t D1!-.l nc1 2 prc,cn cs Cu lnfll Ullll )
o f 1ntL·rc..,1 (< ( }J) u t ( a mpu ~ P.trk/Va r!l 1l\ Pa rk I .!1 l il l 1..~/( a mpll'; 111!1 , a nJ V tl l.1. Jcl t\rro)u f\lo bdc I l o m e Pa rk'' hilc ..1.Jd111g con11g uu u' !l pur tu I .t\ ,\n; a nd m a 1o r bu,1 nc:-.' cente r D 1 ~1 1 p rc:-.c rH~ L t )J o f d m \nlown h 1s1t.1n cal La 11 n u nug hbo rh1.)(1d \,
\\ h1k 1nclm..l ing V 1rgm1a l .o ll11 l \ .u1d nu1o r cl.'nt ra l bu.:.1111..ss ct.nlt.r.:. 111 cl ud1ng I l1~h ~t D 1 ~1 -11,l rHd ) prcscn t.'"" ( {>I o l P~ac h 11111 1 ~l l.'l.ph: I I.J I a nd S1..:r1..•1ia111 (( :a rl sbcrg) \\ h1k h anng '>C\ cral 1m 11 'r busmcss et.'1 11 cr~ l )1s1 ; p n.;scrve, a b.rgc c hunk o f f\l 1)u n ta lll
f\l 1...1d <1\\ s n o nh ()f I R Rd p lu ., ~o m c It ) S of I R ll d to m ah: n u m ber., f11 , p\u, !lom c m a 1<1 r bus 1n c:-.' an:a ~ Dist I pn.:sl'f"\l th l· Ill \\ er g.u 1..:J commun111cs IOHc lhcr b ut .t is<>\\ ra p ., arounJ 10 mcludc 1h 1.: rc ma mdc r of f\lt f\l caJ 1,\\ ~ 1ha t could 111)1 ut hcrn l '>t.' f11
111 a1hH l1l'r d i..1r1 ct (m ost I\ S of I ll ltd ) 11 a lM> 1ncludl.'s m o!l l bus 111 cs"c' \\l'.!1 1 o f Ill /( ;a b bcr t llJ No con ..,.d cra uo n a l a ll fo r \\ h L·rc c~1 s 1 111 g c'mnc il m c mhe ~ li\c l )un c 1us 1 f1 1r (.{>I <Hld 10 h'I \ c b road re p fro m m a n ~ d1!1 t nc 1 ~ fo r mu lt ipl e p n m arJ issue ..
143
Deborah Traffenstedt
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Elizabeth Groden
< ejgroden@yahoo.com >
Monday, January 14, 2019 8:15 PM
Deborah Traffenstedt
Re: Moorpark Needs to Have a Mayor
My name is Elizabeth Groden. I have been a Moorpark resident since 2002.
I believe it is important for Moorpark to continue to have a Mayor. A Mayor provides City-wide leadership,
addresses City-wide infrastructure and other City needs (present and future), and is there to spearhead and effect
City government. A Mayor provides important leadership-not only within the City, but in representing the City
to the outside world. A mayor can network with and reach out to other Mayors/Cities in identifying common
goals, problems, and solutions going forward.
Moorpark should definitely continue to have a Mayor-for all of the above reasons, and more. It is essential.
Elizabeth Groden
14164 Huron Court
Yfoorpark, CA
1
144
Deborah Traffenstedt
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Hello,
Joan Johnson <joanjohnson1022
@gmail.com >
Saturday, December 29, 2018 4:19 PM
Deborah Traffenstedt
District-based elections
As l have heard of the 4 districts vs. 5 districts issue, l wanted to share that l believe the 4 districts retaining the at-large
mayor is the better choice. A rotating mayor position would not be as effective as an elected mayor.
l urge those involved to choose the 4 districts with at-large mayor option.
Best wishes,
Joan
Joan Johnson
3834 Hidden Pine Court
Moorpark, CA 93021
Joanjohnson1022@gmail.com
Cell: 805-390-4832
1
145
Deborah Traffenstedt
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Dieter Wolf <4dwolf@gmail.com>
Monday, December 24, 2018 11:48 AM
Deborah Traffenstedt
One Mayor Please
A rotating mayor position does not have the same weight as a directly elected mayor. Not all councilmembers
want to be mayor or have time.
One Moorpark with one Mayor.
Regards
Dieter Wolf
1
146
Deborah Traffenstedt
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Ms. Traffenstedt,
Wendy <wendelyn64@gmail.com>
Sunday, December 16, 2018 4:41 PM
Deborah Traffenstedt
City of Moorpark
I understand that you are involved in the process to create districts for the City Council. I wanted to voice my opinion
about the process and the fact that I want the Mayoral position to remain a separate, all district, elected position.
I want to elect my Mayor. I do not want the Council of 5 to have to "share" the position based on their decision. When I
choose a City Council member to elect from those running, I choose that person based on their knowledge of the
community, dedication to the position, efforts and volunteerism in our community and other factors. I know the
Mayoral position takes a unique dedication of time, effort, leadership and skills. I do not think that all of our Council
members would make a quality mayor and when we vote by district, the potential candidate pool may even render
more individuals who aren't deeply qualified to be Mayor.
Furthermore, I do not want to create the potential for a combative relationship among the council members as
evidenced back in Moorpark's history where infighting caused us to have 3 Mayors in one night. I think there is no
possible positive that pits the 5 members against each other for a coveted position. I encourage each of them to risk
their 4 year seat to run for a 2 year position if it really means that much to them. And, in the past few elections, no
council member has chosen to risk their 4 year seat for the 2 year Mayoral position.
As a resident of Moorpark, I have watched how our elected leaders have worked together and effectively been inclusive
of all parts of our city. As a resident of a variety of different neighborhoods around the city, I have never felt my region
was neglected or singled out in favor of another. That is due to the power of our voice at City Hall and the fact that
every voice matters. Please hear this voice who looks at this matter as a concerned citizen and not someone with an
agenda of any type. I love our city and support the independence of our uniquely citizen voted Mayor and individually
elected city council members. Please retain that separation and distinction.
Thank you,
Wendy Rokos, M.Ed.
Sent from my iPhone
1
147
Deborah Traffenstedt
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Lise Houston
< lisehouston@roadrunner.com >
Sunday, December 16, 2018 12:06 PM
Deborah Traffenstedt
opinions
We have lived in Moorpark since 1994. We prefer one district and one mayor, but since we have no choice in this re-
districting scenario, we would like to say that 4 districts and 1 at large mayor is preferred over 5 districts and a rotating
mayor which is simply a stupid idea.
Thanks,
Richard and Lise Houston
148
Deborah Traffenstedt
From:
Sent
To:
Subject:
Scott & Caron <campnow@gmail.com >
Sunday, December 16, 2018 11:19 AM
Deborah Traffenstedt
Mayor Position
As we transition to Districts voting for our city council with the intention of improving diversity I understand
there is a movement to eliminate the City Mayor position and have it be a rotating position.
I would strongly oppose a change of the directly elected Mayor position by the whole community of
Moorpark. Please maintain the directly elected Mayor position.
Thank you,
Scott Campbell
1
149
Deborah Traffenstedt
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
To whom it may concern,
William Munsch
<william.munsch@att.net>
Saturday, December 15, 2018 7:25 AM
Deborah Traffenstedt
Van Dam Mark
Elected Mayor and District based Council
Members
As a resident of Moorpark for over 17 years I have seen many elections. I believe that the prior system of generally
elected Council Members was effective and served all of Moorpark well. However, I completely understand the move
toward districts to represent the potentially underrepresented equally. I also recognize the legal issue that drove us to
that position. That comes with a But. Gerrymandering becomes a risk that can entrench misrepresentation. Independent
protection needs to be in place to help prevent that. Regardless, the district approach narrows the populace within a
particular district that a Council Member can be chosen from, especially in a small city like Moorpark. So, the variability
in experience and time availability increases.
The Mayor position is different. It should be a position that represents all of Moorpark and not just a honorary
handoff between Council Members. I would expect the Mayor to be much more visible and to dedicate more time to the
position than the average Council Member. The Mayor is the face of the city, both in side and outside the city limits.
Handing it around the Council Members dilutes that image. The time commitment needs to be something that a
candidate wants to accept. If the average Council Member is not able to commit that time and/or does not have the
experience and personality for the job, then the position looses effectiveness.
My recommendation is to leave the Mayor as a generally elected position.
Thank you for your time,
Bill Munsch
Sent from my iPhone
1
150
Deborah Traffenstedt
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
pamela recupito
<danceten@sbcglobal.net>
Friday, December 14, 2018 6:20 PM
City Council & City Manager
Hi There
I personally like electing a mayor for Moorpark during elections. I don't like the idea of rotation. A mayor' s
position in my opinion is different from a council member and very select few could do the job properly. Thank
goodness for Mayor Janice Parvin who has been gracious to stay on as Mayor and continue to have class and
dignity representing our community. Mayor is very challenging difficult job and very very time consuming.
Thank you,
Pam Rossi
Owner and Director for 27 years
Pam Rossi's Dance Ten
151
Deborah Traffen·stedt
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Debbie,
mauriellol@juno.com
Friday, December 14, 2018 5:41 PM
Deborah Traffenstedt
Districting for City Council
We believe we should have 4 districts for 4 city council members and elect the mayor at large.
The mayor's job is much more significant than a council member.
The mayor not only is at all council meetings, but also represents us at regional and county meetings.
Ralph and June Mauriello
1
152
Deborah Traffenstedt
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Ms. Traffenstedt,
Mark Van Dam
<vandamage@roadrunner.com >
Friday, December 14, 2018 3:39 PM
Deborah Traffenstedt
supports elected mayor
Please accept this email in support of keeping an elected mayor. The mayor must represent the entire city and not just a
specific district. The reasons for doing so are many. I will share my thoughts at an appropriate council meeting.
Sincerely,
Mark Van Dam
1
153
Deborah Traffenstedt
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Hi Debra,
Bruce A Hamous
< bhamous@naicapital.com >
Friday, December 14, 2018 12:28 PM
Deborah Traffenstedt
5 districts proposal
I would be opposed to getting 5 districts instead of just 4. I believe an elected Mayor every 2 years serves not
just one district but the entire city and everyone in all districts have the opportunity to vote for that
person. Please show my vote to keep the Mayor as an open elected position.
Thanks
Bruce A Hamous, CCIM I Vice President
2555 Townsgate Rd, #320. Westlake Village, CA 91361
bhamous@naicapital com I CalBRE Lie# 01073432
Direct 805-277-4023 I Office 805-446-2400 x 4023
Mobile 818-636-8600 I Fax 805-446-2401
Bio I vCard I My Listings I Research I
naicapital.com I NAI Global I 7.000+ Professionals I 400+ Offices I 425M+ SF Property Managed
N'Alcapital
If this ema1l 1s with regards to a transaction. information and/or opinions expressed herein have been provided by a principal or principals 1n the transaction. their
representative or representatives or other third party sources No warranty as to the accuracy or completeness of the information and/or opinions or capability of
the 1nd1v1dual providing such 1nformat1on and/or opinions 1s intended Such 1nformat1on and/or opinions should be independently 1nvest1gated and evaluated and
may not be a basis for hab1l1ty of NAI Capital. Inc or its agents CalBRE Lie No 01990696
1
154
Deborah Traffenstedt
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
To Whom It May Concern:
Debbie Lee
<debbielee4reverse@gmail.com>
Friday, December 14, 2018 10:44 AM
Deborah Traffenstedt
voting districts
I am voicing my opinion as a Moorpark resident, thank you for allowing me to do so.
While I am not happy about the "district" voting issue, I believe the 4 separate districts and a mayor at large is
best for our community. I do NOT like a 5 district possibility with a "rotating" mayor. The position of Mayor
needs to be one who is specifically interested in that position, has the skillset required to be Mayor and the
scheduling availability. Most Council members have full time positions to earn an income for their families, and
being an ad hoc Mayor on a rotating basis is a HUGE fail for our community.
Thank you
Debbie Lee
805.402.0176
155
Deborah Traffenstedt
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Ms. Traffenstedt,
Bruce Rokos < brokos@voguesigns.com >
Friday, December 14, 2018 10:30 AM
Deborah Traffenstedt
Redistricting and the Mayoral position
I understand that you are involved in the process to create districts for the City Council. I wanted to voice my opinion
about the process and the fact that I want the Mayoral position to remain a separate, all district, elected position.
I want to elect my Mayor. I do not want the Council of 5 to have to "share" the position based on their decision. When I
choose a City Council member to elect from those running, I choose that person based on their knowledge of the
community, dedication to the position, efforts and volunteerism in our community and other factors. I know the
Mayoral position takes a unique dedication of time, effort, leadership and skills. I do not think that all of our Council
members would make a quality mayor and when we vote by district, the potential candidate pool may even render
more individuals who aren't deeply qualified to be Mayor.
Furthermore, I do not want to create the potential for a combative relationship among the council members as
evidenced back in Moorpark's history where infighting caused us to have 3 Mayors in one night. 1 think there is no
possible positive that pits the 5 members against each other for a coveted position. I encourage each of them to risk
their 4 year seat to run for a 2 year position if it really means that much to them. And, in the past few elections, no
council member has chosen to risk their 4 year seat for the 2 year Mayoral position.
As a 33 year resident of Moorpark, I have watched how our elected leaders have worked together and effectively been
inclusive of all parts of our city. As a resident of a variety of different neighborhoods around the city, I have never felt
my region was neglected or singled out in favor of another. That is due to the power of our voice at City Hall and the
fact that every voice matters. Please hear this voice who looks at this matter as a concerned citizen and not someone
with an agenda of any type. I love our city and support the independence of our uniquely citizen voted Mayor and
individually elected city council members. Please retain that separation and distinction.
Thank you,
Bruce Rokos
Moorpark, CA
805-320-2094
I a i Virus-free. WWW.avast.com
156
Deborah Traffenstedt
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Sergott, Tania (US -Stamford)
<tsergott@deloitte.com >
Friday, December 14, 2018 10:.01 AM
Deborah Traffenstedt
District-based elections & elected mayor
I wanted to send an email to comment on the proposal to not have an elected mayor who represents the entire city of
Moorpark. While I understand the rationale behind moving to a district-based election system (as Moorpark is quite
geographically differentiated related to socio-economic representation), I do not understand why we would not
continue to elect a mayor, and why we wouldn't have one central person to put the needs of our entire community first
-to consider our community as a whole.
Please send me any information you may have contrary to my opinions on the future of the position of mayor in our
small town -I am always open to learn about others' views, because you may have more information that would
educate me towards a different view!
Kind regards,
Tania
Tania DeSilva Sergott
Audit Managing Director I National Office, Audit & Assurance Services
Deloitte & Touche LLP
Tel/Direct: +1805 532 0043 I Mobile:-: .)03 329 3040
tseraott@delo1tte.cgrn I yvyyw.ijejg1tti;.com
Deloitte
This message (including any attachments) contains confidential information intended for a specific individual
and purpose, and is protected by law. If you are not the intended recipient, you should delete this message and
any disclosure, copying, or distribution of this message, or the taking of any action based on it, by you is strictly
prohibited.
v.E.l
1
157
Deborah Traffenstedt
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
To the City of Moorpark,
I am in favor of having one'elected Mayor.
Sue FitzGerald <sue_53@hotmail.com>
Friday, December 14, 2018 8:56 AM
Deborah Traffenstedt
Elected Mayor position
We need one person to represent ALL of Moorpark, not just a small segment. One person consistently
in the position of Mayor is more effective overall. It only stands to reason that if a person is in a
position for a length of time, they have more working knowledge of the whole.
Not all council members want to be Mayor or hold that position and may be out of their comfort
zone doing so.
Mayor Parvin has always put in the time and effort to make Moorpark the best city it can be. Keeping
the elected mayor is very important to me and our city.
Thank you,
Sue FitzGerald
1
158
Deborah Traffenstedt
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Marcus Cannon < mwcannonl
@gmail.com >
Thursday, December 13, 2018 8:06 PM
Deborah Traffenstedt
Rotating Mayoral Position
I believe the mayor should be an elected and not a rotating position. I believe a strong city is a direct reflection
of its chief executive, the mayor.
We elect them on the basis of what their vision of the city is or can be. Most times that vision is unique to the
individual. I vote no for having a rotating mayoral position.
1
159
Deborah Traffenstedt
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Donald Bing <donald_bing@yahoo.com>
Thursday, December 13, 2018 11:46 AM
Deborah Traffenstedt
Councilmember election districts
I support instituting five districts for councilmemmbers and phasing out
the two-year directly elected mayor. councilmembers would serve four-year
terms, staggered every two years to coincide with the presidential and
congressional mid-term elections. The position of mayor should be rotated
among the five councilmembers. It is my view that this would make for a
more democratic and more representative city council. I DO NOT SUPPORT
HAVING FOUR DISTRICTS!
This may require changing the city charter with respect to the current
process for electing the mayor. so it may take several years to phase in a
district-elected five member council with the position of mayor appointed
on a rotating basis.
Donald Bing
6677 Westwood Street
Moorpark, CA 93021
(805) 217-3641
[@j Virus-free. www.avast.com
1
160
Deborah Traffenstedt
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Dear Ms. Traffenstedt
Cosenza, Michael
< mcosenza@callutheran.edu >
Sunday, December 09, 2018 8:35 PM
Deborah Traffenstedt
Dec. 12 Public Hearing
I am unable to attend the public hearing on 12/12/18 regarding the District Composition Plan but would like
to express my views to the City Council through this email.
The current plan will create 4 districts for city council members and one "at large" position for City
Mayor. Instead I recommend the creation of 5 districts. In my view, the diverse populations of the city will be
better represented through the creation of 5 districts and eliminating the "at large" position of Mayor. For
the position of Mayor, I support the model where the 5 council members select the mayor which was the
procedure when the city was first incorporated.
Thank you for considering my request.
Michael Cosenza, EdD
6936 Shadow Wood Drive
Moorpark, CA 93021
Dr. Michael N. Cosenza I Associate Professor and Director of Professional Development Schools IDept. of
Learning and Teaching 1 Graduate School of Education
60 West Olsen Road #4100 I Thousand Oaks, CA 91360
p 805.493.3595 I r 805.493.3924
President-elect, NAPDS
Past President, SCPDS
1
161
Deborah Traffenstedt
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Attachments:
Diane ,
Deborah Traffenstedt
Tuesday, November 20, 2018 3:12 PM
'Diane Walters'
RE: HOA Map
2018-11-20 Moorpark HOA Boundary
Map.pdf
Attached is a map showing the HOA areas i n Moorpark. We can't guarantee that this 100% accurate, because we do not
have all of the docume·nts that are filed with the State Department of Real Estate for the various HOA 's, but the attached
map shows our general understanding of the HOA boundaries . As an example, there may be variations for the open
space areas included in the HOA boundaries. Also , we showed only the master HOA for Moorpark Highlands . There are
also multiple neighborhood HOA 's in addition to the master HOA for that planned community. Let me know if I can help
you with anything else.
Deborah Traffenstedt
Assistant City Manager
City of '.\loorpark I 799 Moorpark .:hC'. I ~l oor p a rk , C_-\. 9 :w21
(80 5) 517-6213 I fax: (805) 532-2525 I dtraffenstedt@ moorparkca.gov
www.moorp arkca.gov
---Original Message -----
From: Diane Walters [mailto :i skidewl@yahoo .com]
Sent: Monday, November 19, 2018 8 :30 AM
To : Deborah Traffenstedt
Subject : HOA map
1. Precincts w i ll likely be redrawn, so not a factor. Thanks for that info.
2. I can go to Moorpark Unified to get school map.
This was a major factor in the map that will l i ke ly be adopted in Sim i Valley. Maybe this area of i nterest does not apply in
our community.
I
I
162
3. Will wait to receive HOA map from you. HOAs appear to be major area of interest since there are so many in our
community.
Thanks Deborah!
Sent from my iPhone
2
163
=
\ --...
I
\ .
-~
~
~
I
./ .. -
\
~
o!
I
~--
I •
'[]
~~
~ -
...._........,.. _,...,
I
( I }
\ [8 }
I I .
;...,-ti) ......
• I
'I r s
\ I
I
/
164
De bora h Traffenstedt
From:
Sent
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Attachments:
Diane,
Deborah Traffenstedt
Friday, November 16, 2018 5:49 PM
'Diane Walters '
Troy Brown
RE: 11/15/18 Emails regarding District-
Based Elections
2018-1113 Public Hearing Moorpark I.ntro
to Districting.pptx; Moorpark Unified
School District Boundary.pdf
Just wanted to le t you know that I'm working on getting you a up-to-date map with the HOA boundaries and will send it
via a separate email when completed.
I have attached an MUSD boundary map (see the MUSD website for an interactive map :
https://betalocator.decisioninsite.com/?Studyl0=85026 ). The MUSD boundary map is not really applicable to the City
Councitmember district s, because that boundary extends outside the City limits . We do not currently have a map
showing the attendance boundary for each of the MUSD elementary and middle schools, although the MUSD interactive
online map shows the distance to the closest school when an address is entered. MUSD does allow and encourage a
school of choice selection, so the attendance boundaries are not necessari ly significant. For example, I live in Mountain
Meadows, but my children attended Walnut Canyon School. If you want me to see if I can obtain a map from MUSD
showing individual school attendance boundaries, let me know .
In regard to your question about viewing current election precinct maps, we would need t-o purchase those from the
County of Ventura , but I do not believe the current election precincts are applicable to the formation of new City
Councilmember election districts. After the new City of Moorpark Councilmember district map is approved by ordinance
by the City, the County of Ventura election precinct maps will be revised accordingly. For example, Section 12222 of the
State Elections Code i ncludes the following requirement:
12222.
(a) No precinct shall be establish ed so that its boundary cros ses the boundary of any supervisorial district,
con gress ional district, senatorial district, Assembly district, board of equ al1 zat 1on distri ct, judicial district,
incorporated city , ward, or city council district .
I have attached a copy of the PowerPoint from the November 13 public hearing. Suggested slides to review i n the
attached file include : Sli de 5, which shows traditional redistricting principles that may be considered; Slide 7, which
shows the areas i n the Cit y with a high Latino population concentration; and Slide 8, which further defines a community
of interest.
1
165
Regarding your question about the deadline to submit a map, our demographer has to release to the public draft maps
no later than January 16, 2019, which is one week prior to the first public hearing on District Map(s) and Sequencing on
January 23, 2019. This means that you should consider initially submitting any map suggestions before the
demographer produces the maps to be released on January 16. Comments on draft map(s) will then continue to be
received through the public hearing process for District Maps and Sequencing (January 23 and February 6).
I will be sending you an HOA map when it is completed. District map suggestions should be submitted to:
districtelections@moorparkca .gov or mailed to the City of Moorpark, Attention District Elections, 799 Moorpark Avenue,
Moorpark, CA 93021.
Deborah Traffenstedt
Assistant City Manager
City n f i\loorpark /!-)!1 ;\l oorp a rk .\ve. i\lon rpark , C .-\ !1 >Hl'.2 I
( 05 ) 5 17·0:21 :3 fax . l, 05 ) 5 3 2 ·2525 I dtraffenstedt@ moorparkca.gov
www .moorparkca .gov
-Original Message----
From: Diane Walters [mailto :i sk idewl@yahoo.com ]
Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2018 9:09 AM
To: Deborah Traffenstedt
Subject: School District Maps
Do you have school district maps that can be posted as well?
Sent from my iPhone
>On Nov 15, 2018, at 7 :47 AM , Diane Walters <iskidewl@yahoo.com> wrote :
>
> Dear Deborah,
>Three questions:
>
> 1.Does city have precinct maps that can be posted on city website?.
>
> 2 . Does city have HOA maps that can be posted on city website?
>
> 3. What date is the deadline for public to submit maps?
>
> I believe where HOAs & precincts are located should also be considered for determining sensible district maps.
>
>Thanks
>
> Sent from my iPhone
2
166
NDC
National Demographics Corporation
•
November 13,
2018
City of Moorpark
Introduction to Districting
167
NDC California Voting Rights Act (CVRA)
Narional Dern ogrdphics Corµoranon _..._____
o Under the Federal Voting Rights Act (passed in 1965), a jurisdiction must
fail 4 factual tests before it is in violation of the law. ·
o The California VRA makes it significantly easier for plaintiffs to force ·
jurisdictions into "by-district" election systems by eliminating two of the
US Supreme Court Gingles tests:
Can the pfotected class constitute the majority of a district?
Does the protected class vote as a bloc?
Do the voters who are not in the protected class vote in a bloc to defeat the
preferred candidates of the protected class?
Do the "totality of circumstances" indicate face is a factof in elections?
o Liability is now determined only by the ·presence of racially polarized
young
". ' 111 I H I I ) '111 ~
168
NDC CVRA I mpact
Ndrional Demographics Corporation -o Switched (or in the process of
switching) as a result of CVRA:
At least 17 5 school districts
28 Community College Districts
100+ cities
1 County Board of Supervisors
10 water and other special districts.
o Key settlements:
Palmdale: $4. 7 million
Modesto: $3 million
Highland: $1.3 million
Anaheim: $1.1 million
Whittier: $1 million
Santa Barbara: $600,000
Tulare Hospital: $500,000
Madera Unified: about $170,000
Hanford Joint Union Schools:
$118,000
Merced City: $42,000
169
NDC D is tri cting Process
National Demographics Corporation -Step
Two Initial Hearings
Nov. 13 & Dec. 12
Release draft maps
Two hearings on
draft maps
Jan.9or16&
Feb. 6or13
Map adoption
Feb. 6 or13 &
Feb. 13 or 20
November 13, 2018
Description
Held prior to release of draft maps.
Education and to solicit input on the communities in the District.
Maps must be posted at least 7 days prior to 3rd hearing.
Two meetings to discuss and revise the draft maps and to discuss
the election sequence.
Map adopted via ordinance.
Final map must be posted at least 7 days prior to adoption.
170
NOC Districting R ules
National Demographics Corporation
Federal Laws
o Equal Population o Communities of interest
o Federal Voting Rights Act o Compact
o No Racial Gerrymandering o Contiguous
November 13, 2018
o Visible (Natural & man-made)
boundaries
o Respect voters' choices /
continuity in office
o Planned future growth
171
NDC
Nanonal Demographics Corpora tio n _.____ ___ _
Demographic
Summary
Each of the four districts must
contain about 8,605 residents.
Rac e /E thni c Profile
·fatal Population
Latino
NH White
NH Black/ African-American
N H Native American
N H Asi an-American
N H Pacific Islander
N H Other
N H Multi-Race
Citizen VAP total
CVAP Latino
CV AP NH White
CVAP NH African-American
CV AP NH Asian & Pacific Islander
CVAP Other
Voter Registration (Nov. 2016)
Latino Reg
Asian-Surnamed Reg.
Filipino-Surnamed Reg.
Est. NH White Reg.
Est. African-Amer. Reg
Democratic Reg .
Republican Reg.
Other/No Party Reg .
Voters Casting Ballot s (Nov. 2016)
Latino voters
Asian-Surnamed voters
Filipino-Surnamed voters
Est. NH White voters
Est. African-Amer. Reg
Democratic voters
Republican voters
Other/No Party voters
Count Percent
34,421
10,813 31 %
19,654 57%
600 2%
213 1%
2,840 8%
74 0%
89 0%
138 0%
23,476
4,970 21 %
15,951 68 %
373 2%
1,944 8%
239 1%
20,573
4,427 22%
883 4%
209 1%
14,501 70 %
297 1%
7,268 35 %
7,823 38%
5,482 27%
17 ,056
3,485 20%
693 4%
165 1%
12,256 72%
252 1%
6,128 36%
6,741 40%
4,187 25 %
ACS Profile Count Percen t
ACS Total Pooulation 35,029 2%
Immigrant 6,257 18%
Naturalized (pct of total immigrants) 2,940 47%
Age 5+ 32,993
Speak English at home 23,694 72%
Speak Spanish at home 6,564 20%
Speak an Asian language at home 1,139 3%
Speak other language at h ome 1,595 5%
Speak English o nly "well" or le ss 3,810 12%
Age 25+ 22,855
Age 25+, no HS degree 2,884 13%
Age 25+, HS degree (only) 11,469 50 %
Age 25+, bachelor degree (only) 5,776 25%
Age 25+, graduate degree (o nly) 2,727 12%
Households 10,584
Child under 18 in Household 3,993 38 %
Income $0-25k 759 7%
Income $25-50k 1,336 13 %
In come $50-75k 1,54 1 15%
I n come $75 -200k 5,389 51 %
Income $200k+ 1,558 15%
Housing uni ts 10,981
Single-F amily 9,455 86%
Multi-Familv 1,526 14%
Rented 2,811 27%
Owned 7,772 73%
Voters Casting Ball ots (Nov . 2014) 9,397 46 %
Latino voters 1,475 16%
Asian -Surnamed voters 35 1 4%
Filipi n o-Surnamed voters 83 1%
Est. N H White voters 7,297 78 %
Est. African -Amer. Reg 68 1%
Democratic voters 3,180 34 %
Repu b lican voters 4,383 47%
Other/No Party voters 1,834 20%
172
NDC Latino Population
National De mographi cs Corporation
November 13, 2018
Latinos are particularly
concentrated around
the center of the city
and along Hwy 118.
V~o)'o */Q~'.'" Hm Pk Oak Par}t
·-----I
LatinoCVAP
0% to 25%
25 % to35%
35% to50%
50"/o to 65 %
65 "/o to 750/e
75 "/o to 100%
Other
Asian-Americans and African-
? Amen·cans are not concentrated
anywhere in the city.
173
NDC Defining Communities of Interest
National Demographics Corporation
ts t Question:·what is your neighborhood or community of interest?
A Community of Interest is generally defined as a neighborhood or
community of shared interests, views, problems, or characteristics.
Possible community feature/boundary definitions include:
o School attendance areas
o Natural neighborhood dividing lines, such as highway or major roads, rivers, canals,
and/ or hills
o Areas around parks and other neighborhood landmarks
o Common issues, neighborhood activities, or legislative/ election concerns
o Shared demographic characteristics
Such as similar le vels of income, education, or linguistic isolation
2nd Question: Does a Community of Interest want to be united in one
district, or to be divided to have a voice in multiple elections?
November 13, 2018
174
NDC Sarµple Compact Maps
National Demographics Corporation
Clty of Compton
2012 Redlaulctlng
Pfan Adopted Oct. ~ --+-r--.
·~'\,..~""'
___,_,__,_._,lJ
...., \Fl-I
Compton
a
MopJ.y~'"
q ~~
~ Ptpclil"1/l"-cr Uaa.
••11.rMid ·-.........
.._Jw .... .._
M.jot."'91'1
Glendale
Unified
Examples of highly compact maps, with nooks and jogs
. driven only by equal population requirements.
November 13, 2018
Areas
GUSO Faciliti ..
ColKinuadoa f l.ud•p. (Z)
-Elnuruouy (21)
-HJab(~)
Middk(•l
Oihrt (12)
175
NDC Sample Multiple -Representative Maps
National Demographics Corporation
'' ' J
Pasadena
176
NDC Map -Drawing Tools
National Demogrdphics Corporation
o This is your chance to actually draw the map, rather than only
commenting on maps drawn by others.
o Draw your neighborhood; draw the district you want for your area; or
draw an entire citywide map.
o You can use the paper map, the Microsoft Excel tool, the online tool,
or any other map.
11!\'t 11!1 ll'I I) '1118
177
NDC
National Demographics Corporation -._______,
November 13, 2018
l
U sing the One-Page Paper Map
City of Moorpark 2018 Districting
Public Participation Kit Map
An online v.:reioa of this map that allows you to zoom in aod out for
more detail is available as a link from the City website.
Each number indicates the total population of that "population
unit" area. Each district must have essentially equal population.
The population of each of the four districts you draw must be
close to 8,605, with no mo.re than a 860-pcreon difference
between the laqe&t and smaDeet.
Name:
Email:
Phone:
M"playen-
j C.....olllod<
t.a.-..IU'kAra.
178
NDC Using the Excel tool
Enter the district assignment in
the highlighted column, and
Excel will calculate the resulting
demographic changes.
National Demographics Corporation
Fite Insert Page Layout Formulas Data Home
A Cut G.vamond • 9 • A. A" ---~
Paste ll:!copy
<I Fonnat Painter
Oipboanl
A6 .,. fx
14-A-. _e ~!, .2...., T;,.~ P -!.L •0o.v~. &um 1!..i --;L..; K
2 Oh i,605 Ill: 0 8,605 Ol1 0 8,605 D4t
Review View Help
~WrapText
N
~·-----+-------------~-----------------4 Pop l-,~--~Tout,,,,,,~r.::i::,,,,,,"=°"!.,.,,,-----+--~u""".W..""-~v=="'°'~""'"""""='-'-o-c-:-r---~K~·"'"~·~20~1~•~1
Dntna. Unit Tu1. NH '.'llH ~Ii NH
5
.6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17 18-
19
20 ~
21
22 23--
2r
2S
28
27
28
29 30-
31
·-~ 1.l57
82
H 1~·-\'Vh_, Hlk NI I i\s.t
30S 781
n s
114
)91
u
0
-18
86
31
17
.'.!II
0
93
November u, LU l ~
'"' 9;o
S5
Ill?
ID
J3
:m
1 1~ ..
1"'4 ...,
0 7•
:nu
• I~
l4
71
26
197
tilk •hll IUI -------~ 82 G55
0
0
0
0
0
78
ll
0
S7
27'4
29
26l
b1mu
ll8
1
0
II
m
6
S7
II
l!9
213
m
370
0
0
105
4S,}
1211
2-Ml
171
83
0
0
u
4
oa
Interactive Map
ACROBAT p Tell me whlll you want to
File Home Insert Draw Page layout Formulas Data Review View Help ACROBAT P Tell me what you want to
A Cut
~Copy
Garamond ·111 • A. A --_117
Paste
A3
<I Form•t Painter
Oipboard
A B
B I ll 83 -~ Ji
Font
.,. Jx enter your name here
c D E F
Suma by Di11ric1 Assigned Ideal population:
2 City nf MooTark 2018 l'ublic Participation Kit
Coun"
Grouo Cate .... ..., I ! l
_ TuLPop. __ g'6 j~-_.8,_Tf!I ~~
u.ri&W>O £rocn 3.'.!'J i 197 lH 353
9 Tn,.I -!·~~. -· -i·-·--.,_
10-Populotioo _ !:!ioP _4,_894 I 2,325 _..,._QS...!__ i ,J-13
G
8,605
H
UaaHi.......d 'l'o<al
.Q... . -~42 !_ -
1182
141)113
~~WrapText
$. %
K L
4% 4'1•
I .11!!• +-~-.
5YoA 6~4
' .-,(I .oo Conditional Fo
00 1:G Fonnaning
M N
~
7.9"11 -31%
57'>\ 11 NH Wh1 2.661 j 4,940 s.•17 6.630 19,654
12 N I-I Blk J02 1 169 202 127 600 I ~'• ~-l'!'o , JO,g ,__. ~-
1:f _______ N_H~A~'"~-+-~52..~'--;f~8_70~-7~50 ___ 69_8_1 __ 0 __ t-,~~~ll-IO,,-t--·_·-:::.-:::.~-:::.~-=----·-~_i(i!_v,_,-__ -_~-~----;·;-_=W=~~-+-----+-~~~~--t
14 _ Tob>I CV~!'_--~2El_~~ -· 6,7~. ___ !!._ ___ . 230476 ----·---·---.,.-·----.1__ __
15 Citizcu Voting Hisp 1,672 f 1,000 1,321 977 0 4,970 38'\', 17'1, 21'Yo 14'/o
ta "ll" 1''lt~" 2,:101
1
1 ,!,9_59_._•,>40_ s,151 o 1s,9s 1 ~.2'~. l .-~fa -l-7.~ 1(f;,
17 Populiooo NU Blk. ~ 194 20 105 0 373 l"le )l!r, 0-rV zu1.
1a - . ~ii-,i~... .W1 r -;,11 --;1s -4is--o 1."'" Bo/• ' -lii<i• 1'!!. 1o;,
19 Tob>I Rtg. 3,561 ! 5,962 4.922 6,128 U 20,573
':'!'~"' -1.L.f!l i l_.215 1,C!8'J 702 0 ii-1Wgi1ldti<M1 ~~;::cau _JH·-~ ~~i--~ __ 20 No.. 2016 4,427
883
209
21•1o
68%
-_!l!_ -
ao,o
23 To~_Vo.!"'!. 2;113 I !93~-4,()63. _ 5,285 . 0 17.056 _
24-Nov. 2016 l..arino lcll52 , 983 838 612 0 3,485 38'1• ~· 21'/o 12"1~ 20'/! ~ \'Okn .\'i.W1 -.~riL·IW t37 '1 180 ' 160 -~2 "16-i--~--t 693 "-__ s_•,,, ___ + ___ 4"_Y. _____ 4_'A~•-.___4c'l1,~· -f--~~
~'--------~Jl=ili~·ru=m~o _ _,_--'22=-~-511~-'---~+1-'--~4~1__, __ o~ _ _,__~1-65~-~1·_~--~1~~~·-~~l~'lo'--~-'-1'~~'--.._-----'--~1'~•__,
27
28 Submirter's Comment• 11bou1 the pl1U11
29 ( thi nk tlll3 map maka sense bcaul!c •..•
179
NDC
National D emogra phics Corporati on
Tutorials and help
resources are available
from the login page.
Circled items:
1: controls to move
around the map;
2: choose into which
district selected territory
will be placed;
3: options for how to
select territory;
4: demographic summary
of districts;
5: demographic change
of currently selected area;
6: review map when
finished;
7: submit map.
November 13 , 2018
Using the online tool
fl.cf P!i~ You r Onl1111• RP1ll s l 11 1 t i ng Pla11s
Login with your .... , n•m• •nd pHaword
New UHr I Forgot pauwor d I Contact U•
Moorpark version should be
ready by Monday, 11/19.
Log In I
Chango-Popula< : : ~ ~
--'·"' Ill DllvlaUOll -31 ,11!!9
%Drtlotlon -100.0%
(lllsPllftlc OtlglnJ
Chango • [lllsponlc Or1gln) O
% (Hlsponlc Origin)
------------------------
180
NDC Public Hearing & Discussion
National Demographics Corporation
i. What is your neighborhood or "community of interest"?
2. Do you prefer your neighborhood be kept together in one
district or have multiple representatives?
3 . What are other communities of interest in the City that should
be considered when drafting maps?
November 13 , 2018
181
• Moorpark Unified School District
SNct Language •
To Get 'mrted:
• Ent•r your HdreH •bove.
• OrUH ttl•buttonOtoctict.onll'I•
map ta tel us 'Nher!I you ar..
Or dick e c nthem&ptoUH)"lUr
cumifTI ~c.bOl'I .
• Clicir. and drag to pen around.
• Ooub .. CHc:k to zoom in.
Click on a •chool view phone numbtr.
webpage, 11nd directton1.
0 Top L-" •kl• Contrula :
• Change blldtgmund l.lS1ng Mao menu
(Sll'l .. ite, ttltrliln. tttut, etc.}.
• Zoom control• in(•) •nd out H
(Ahrnetiv.t;· uu 1crol wti.el)
• Use $ to UH Your Cutn1nt l.OC9bc>n
• M"sure di9tlnce
• 5.i.ct a llnguage prer.rence
O Top Rtght ekie Contrals:
• O~n th. Map in FWI Screen
• Sfled a l.lyer
L99encl:
ti Ele..,..nto.y ti M~dle ti High
Enter Your AddreSI H9fe
®
@)
-.tl... ...... --
•
......
s
OMopbox (-:/-·-·'°""""......_,,OOQim-l""P_ope_.<><vl_
-.. "2)[3Cq&1(o)XJ ~k~, ' ='DJIID
182
Deborah Traffenstedt
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Attachments:
Diane ,
Deborah Traffenstedt
Friday, November 09, 2018 2:49 PM
'Diane Walters'
FW: New District-Based Election-
Community Meeting Agenda for
November 13, 2018, at 6:30 p.m.
Moorpark District-Based Elections Fact
Sheet & Timeline.pdf
See the New Agenda l in k in t he foll owing email fo r the agenda for the meeting on Tuesday, November 13 . The map for
drawing will be ava i lable at Tuesda y's m eet ing and next week we should then also have the Public Participat ion Kit map
and on line drawing too l available on our website (we are closed on Monday for the holiday). You indicated in your prior
email that you didn't fi nd the m ee t ing schedule on our website, so I have attached that schedule fo r your convenience.
Deborah Traffenstedt
Assistant City Manager
City of Moorpark I 799 Moorpark Ave. I Moorpar k, CA 9 30 21
(8 0 5) 51 7-6213 I fax: (805) 532-252 5 I dtraffenstedt@moorparkca.gov
www .moorparkca.gov
From: District-Based Election Community Meeting [mailto:listserv@civicplus.com]
Sent: Friday, November 09, 2018 11:57 AM
To: Deborah Traffenstedt
SUbject: New District-Based Election Community Meeting Agenda for November 13, 2018, at 6:30 p.m.
View this in your browser
1
183
Greetings,
This E-mail is sent to notify you that a new item has been posted to a list that you subscribe to .
You can access the new item in City Council Agenda through the following link :
New Agenda
You can find more City Council Agendas , Annotated Agendas , and Videos at the following link:
City Council Agendas. Annotated Agendas, and Video Archives
The actions taken by the City Council are available in video format and on the Annotated Agenda within 24 hours
following a meeting.
You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to City Council Agenda on rnoorparkca.gov. To
unsubscribe, click the following link:
Unsubscribe
2
184
On October 11 , 2018 , following receipt of
a threat of costly litigation , the City Council
voted 5-0 to transition the City 's at-large
election system to a district-based election
system . In a district-based election system ,
the City is carved into geographic districts .
Voters in each district then choose their City
Council representative, who must also live in
that district. The Mayor would continue to be
elected through an at-large election system .
TIMl;LINE OF EVENTS
-~ --------------------..... ~ ~~-------~ ----
November 13. 2018 6:30 PM
First Public Hearing on District Composition (Pre-Map Drawing)
(Not a City Council meeting)
December 12. 2018 6:30 PM
Second Public Hearing on District Composition (Pre-Map
Drawing) (Not a _City Council meet in g)
Draft Map(s) and Sequencing Released to the Public no later
than January 16, 2019.
January 23. 2019 6:30 PM
First Public Hearing on District Maps and Sequencing
------------------(Special City Council meeting) The City wants your ideas and feedback
about how the districts should be drawn .
Please attend the events listed to the right
and bookmark www.moorparkca.gov/Districts
for up-to-date information about the districting
process . -------------------
11-------------------
For more information , please contact :
Deborah Traffenstedt , Assistant City Manager
(805) 517-6213
dtraffenstedt@moorparkca .gov
Revised Map(s) and New Draft Maps and Sequencing Released
to Public no later than January 30, 2019
February 6. 2019 6:30 PM
Second Public Hearing on District Maps and Sequencing ,
1 n trod u ct ion of Ordinance (Regular City Council meeting)
March 6. 2019 6:30 PM
F in a I Public Hearing and Adoption of Ordinance
(Regular City Council meeting)
All meetings at Moorpark City Hall, Apricot Room , 799 Moorpark
Ave . Spanish interpreters will be present at all meetings .
185
Deborah Traffenstedt
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Diane,
Deborah Traffenstedt
Wednesday, November 07, 2018 11:27
AM
'Diane Walters'
Brian Chong
City of Moorpark District-Based Election
Map Drawing
I'm really happy to hear that you are interested in participating in the map drawing process. Our contractor, National
Demographics Corporation (NDC), is currently working on the map that they are creating for the public participation kit,
which map will include population numbers in a grid format for the entire City of Moorpark. I know that a one page
paper map file will be available by the day of the 1st public hearing meeting on Tuesday, November 13, but due to the
Monday holiday, I don't think it will be available earlier. Also, we are paying for an on line mapping tool for which NDC is
in the process of acquiring the license for Moorpark. That online mapping tool for the Moorpark map should also be
available by next week and a link will then be made available on our City website.
The 4 districts for Council member elections will have to contain essentially equal population numbers (which is the
purpose of creating all ofthe population grids to facilitate the district map drawing). Small population deviations are
permitted for the districts if they are necessary to achieve traditional redistricting principles which include: maintaining
communities of interest, creating compact, contiguous districts; or using visible natural or manmade boundaries. The
public's input is needed to identify "communities of interest" and also to understand how a community wants to be
represented: Such as, do the residents of a particular community want that area to be kept together (to be a larger part
of a single Councilmember's district); or do the residents want to be divided (in order to have the interest of more than
one City Councilmember)? NDC has extensive experience with the district-based election process, and they will explain
the map drawing process at our public hearing on Tuesday of next week.
Following the presentation and opportunity for public comment at the public hearing on November 13, the NOC
representative will be available to provide some one-on-one instruction to persons attending who have questions on
how to draw a paper map as well as how to use the online mapping tool. So we will definitely have paper maps
available for you to pick up at that meeting or you will be able to print the paper map template from our website or use
the on line mapping tool. Hopefully, you are available to attend next Tuesday's meeting at 6:30 p.m. at the Moorpark
Community Center (Apricot Room), otherwise, the 2nd public hearing on December 12 at 6:30 p.m. (same meeting
location) will provide the same information and opportunity for assistance with map drawing.
Deborah Traffenstedt
Assistant City Manager
City of Moorpark I 799 Moorpark Ave. I Moorpark, CA 93021
(805) 517-6213 I fax: (805) 532-2525 I dtraffenstedt@moorparkca.govwww.moorparkca.gov
1
186
-----Original Message-----
From: Diane Walters [mailto:iskidewl@yahoo.com]
Sent: Monday, November 05, 2018 4:51 PM
To: Deborah Traffenstedt
Subject: Maps of Moorpark
Do you have maps that I can pick up this week before new districts boundary meeting?
Sent from my iPhone
2
187
Attachment 7
Minutes of 11/13/2018 and 12/12/2018 Public Hearings
12853-0027\2261170v11.doc 188
MINUTES OF THE DISTRICT-BASED ELECTION
COMMUNITY MEETING
Moorpark, California November 13, 2018
A District-Based Election Community Meeting of the City of Moorpark was held on
November 13, 2018, in the Community Center of said City located at 799 Moorpark
Avenue, Moorpark, California.
1. CALL TO ORDER:
City Clerk Maureen Benson called the meeting to order at 6:37 p.m.
2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE:
Former City Manager Steven Kueny led the Pledge of Allegiance.
3. PUBLIC HEARING:
A. First Public Hearing for District-Based Election Process to Invite and
Receive Public Input Regarding the Composition of the Districts for the
Election of City Councilmembers Prior to Drawing a Draft Map or Maps of
the Proposed Boundaries of the Districts. Staff Recommendation: The
City Manager will open the public hearing and direct National
Demographic Corporation to provide a presentation and explanation of the
districting process, public input will be encouraged and received regarding
the composition of the districts, and the public hearing will be closed. (The
second public hearing on the Composition of the Districts is scheduled for
December 12, 2018, at 6:30 p.m.)
City Manager Troy Brown opened the public hearing and introduced
demographer Douglas Johnson of National Demographics. Mr. Johnson
provided a PowerPoint presentation which included discussion of why the
City has initiated the process to move to district-based elections, the
required time frame for accomplishing this, the requirements of state and
federal law, and the tools the City of Moorpark has available on its website
for residents to draw their own district maps to present to the City for
consideration.
Four members of the community spoke during the public hearing and Mr.
Johnson responded by providing additional clarification on the process for
drawing districts. He also provided additional explanation regarding how
increasing the number of districts in a City the size of Moorpark is an
option, but not common, because this would result in a lower number of
voters in each district, and that this could result in a Councilmember being
elected by a small number of voters.
ATTACHMENT 7
189
Minutes of the District-Based Election
Community Meeting
Moorpark, California Page 2 November 13, 2018
In response to a question about whether more than four (4) districts could
be mapped, Assistant City Attorney Nicholas Ghirelli, explained that to
change the number of districts requires a vote of the people, and there is
not time for an election prior to the deadline for the safe harbor ordinance
adoption.
In response to a question regarding how often the districts would be
redrawn and how incumbents would serve out their current term of office
following establishment of the districts, Mr. Johnson explained the districts
must be redrawn every 10 years after the census is completed. He also
discussed scenarios for Councilmembers serving out their term of office
and sequencing for district implementation in the 2020 and 2022 elections.
Mr. Johnson also responded to questions about the priority for election
year 2020 or 2022 sequencing for a new district with a high Latino voter
population.
In response to a question whether a population area could be divided to
create two districts representing Moorpark College, Mr. Johnson
confirmed that a street could be used as a boundary to divide Moorpark
College into two districts; however, he also stated that it was important to
remember that college students lived throughout the whole City. Mr.
Brown provided a street boundary example for the Moorpark College area
that wouldn't actually split the College property.
Mr. Johnson discussed mapping tools that would be available on the City's
website, and Mr. Chong shared information that the City's website at
www.moorparkca.gov/districts contains the tools for mapping and all
communications regarding the district-based election process.
Mr. Brown closed the public hearing and reminded the public the next
community meeting for the district-based election process will be on
December 12, 2018.
4. ADJOURNMENT:
The meeting adjourned at 7:34 p.m.
Troy Brown, City Manager
ATTEST:
~!!.~~
Maureen Benson, City Clerk
190
MINUTES OF THE DISTRICT-BASED ELECTION
COMMUNITY MEETING
Moorpark, California December 12, 2018
A District-Based Election Community Meeting of the City of Moorpark was held on
December 12, 2018, in the Community Center of said City located at 799 Moorpark
Avenue, Moorpark, California.
1 . CALL TO ORDER:
City Clerk Maureen Benson called the meeting to order at 6:49 p.m.
2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE:
City Manager Troy Brown led the Pledge of Allegiance.
3. PUBLIC HEARING:
A. Second Public Hearing for District-Based Election Process to Invite and
Receive Public Input Regarding the Composition of the Districts for the
Election of City Councilmembers Prior to Drawing a Draft Map or Maps of
the Proposed Boundaries of the Districts. Staff Recommendation: The
City Manager will open the public hearing and direct National
Demographic Corporation to provide a presentation and explanation of the
districting process, public input will be encouraged and received regarding
the composition of the districts, and the public hearing will be closed. (The
first City Council public hearing on the District Maps and Sequencing is
scheduled for a special meeting on January 23, 2019, at 6:30 p.m.)
City Manager Troy Brown opened the public hearing.
Ms. Benson introduced demographer Robert Mcintyre of National
Demographics.
Mr. Mcintyre stated he will be discussing communities of interest; how
maps are drawn; the legal qualifications for drawing the maps; and will
introduce three tools for drawing the maps. He provided a PowerPoint
presentation on the California Voting Rights Act and explained why the
City has initiated this process to move to district-based elections; the
required time frame for accomplishing this; the requirements of state and
federal law; and the tools the City of Moorpark has available on its website
for residents to draw their own district maps to present to the City for
consideration.
191
Minutes of the District-Based Election
Community Meeting
Moorpark, California Page 2 December 12, 2018
Mr. Mcintyre explained that draft maps need to be submitted before or by
January 16, 2019. These maps will be reviewed at the special City
Council meeting on January 23, 2019.
Mr. Mcintyre demonstrated how to draw maps using the tools on the City's
website and emphasized the goal of drawing maps based on communities
of interest and essential population numbers for each district based on the
2010 Census.
Six members of the community spoke during the public hearing, and
included comments on the creation of more than four districts; having an
elected Mayor versus an appointed Mayor; and avoiding gerrymandering
districts to accommodate existing Councilmembers who live close to each
other. Mr. Mcintyre responded by providing additional clarification on the
process for drawing districts and referred to the City Attorney for response
to comments on creating more than four districts.
City Attorney Kevin Ennis stated that maps of five districts or more may be
submitted, as no decision on the number of districts has been made. He
clarified that the City Council did initiate a process to convert from the at-
large Council election system to a district-based system with four districts
and an elected Mayor. Mr. Mcintyre stated that the percentage of cities in
Ventura County that have adopted five districts with an appointed Mayor
as opposed to four districts with an elected Mayor is about 50/50.
Mr. Ennis explained that Measure D adopted by the Moorpark voters in
1988 required a directly elected Mayor, which is still currently in force. He
went on to state the City Council can overturn this Measure due to a
California State statute enacted in 2016 and effective in January 2017 that
allows the Council in the context of trying to bring their electoral process
into compliance with the California Voting Rights Act to approve, without
going to the voters, to have five, seven, or nine districts; or four, six or
eight districts with a directly elected Mayor.
Mr. Mcintyre further demonstrated the mapping tools on the City's website
at www.moorparkca.gov/districts and stated tools for creating five districts
will be added to the website.
In response to one speaker's concerns that the community of Moorpark
Highlands has been divided on the website map, Mr. Mcintyre assured
that if they do not receive a map showing that area as a community of
interest, they will create a map that does; and in response to another
request he said they would add data online to indicate how many units
have been occupied since the last census date.
192
Minutes of the District-Based Election
Community Meeting
Moorpark, California Page 3 December 12, 2018
Mr. Brown closed the public hearing and reminded the public of the
special City Council meeting on January 23, 2019.
4. ADJOURNMENT:
The meeting adjourned at 8:18 p.m.
Troy Brown, City Manager
ATTEST:
Maureen Benson, City Clerk
193
Attachment 8
Chart of Estimated Additional Units since the 2010 Census
12853-0027\2261170v11.doc 194
ATTACHMENT 8
APPLICANT / DEVELOPER COMMON PROJECT NAME LOCATION STATUS PROJECT DESCRIPTION ACRES (APPX.)
Built from April 2010 to Present
SHEA HOMES IVY LANE/CANTERBURY
LANE
SOUTH SIDE OF LOS
ANGELES AVENUE,
EAST OF FREMONT
AVE
BUILT 116 DUPLEX AND
SINGLE FAMILY
UNITS
PARDEE HOMES/TOLL
BROTHERS/RICHMOND
AMERICAN
MOORPARK HIGHLANDS EAST SIDE OF
SPRING ROAD,
NORTH OF BETWEEN
CHARLES AVENUE
AND WALNUT
CANYON
BUILT 315 SINGLE FAMILY
RESIDENCES
AREA HOUSING AUTHORITY CHARLES STREET
APARTMENTS
396 CHARLES
STREET
BUILT 20 APARTMENT
UNITS
JOE GARCIA 311 CHARLES
STREET
BUILT 1 SINGLE FAMILY
RESIDENCE
TUCKER 12464 PALMER BUILT 1 SINGLE FAMILY
RESIDENCE (2ND
DWELLING, PRIOR
TO ADU RULES)
MARY ROMO 14490 AVENIDA
COLONIA
BUILT 1 SINGLE FAMILY
RESIDENCE
JESS CASTANEDA 14343 AVENIDA
COLONIA
BUILT 1 SINGLE FAMILY
RESIDENCE
FRANKLIN RICCI 11815 DARLENE LANE BUILT 1 SINGLE FAMILY
RESIDENCE (2ND
DWELLING, PRIOR
TO ADU RULES)
VIKTOR KREIDER 6150 DARLENE LANE BUILT 1 SINGLE FAMILY
RESIDENCE
TOLL BROTHERS MASTERS AT MOORPARK
COUNTRY CLUB ESTATES
NORTH SIDE OF
CHAMPIONSHIP
DRIVE, EAST OF
GRIMES CANYON
ROAD
BUILT 50 SINGLE FAMILY
RESIDENCES
K. HOVNANIAN MERIDIAN HILLS MERIDIAN HILLS
DRIVE, WEST OF
WALNUT CANYON
ROAD
BUILT 183 SINGLE FAMILY
RESIDENCES
K. HOVNANIAN K HOV AFFORDABLES WALNUT CANYON
ROAD, SOUTH OF
MERIDIAN HILLS
BUILT 17 SINGLE FAMILY
RESIDENCES
AREA HOUSING AUTHORITY EVERETT STREET
APARTMENTS
20 AND 80 EVERETT
STREET
BUILT 24 APARTMENT
UNITS
BUILT FROM
APRIL 2010 TO
PRESENT 731
195
APPLICANT / DEVELOPER COMMON PROJECT NAME LOCATION STATUS PROJECT DESCRIPTION ACRES (APPX.)
APPROVED, NOT YET UNDER CONSTRUCTION
PACIFIC COMMUNITIES
NELSON CHUNG
1000 DOVE STREET #100
NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92660
949-660-8988
nelson@pcbinc.com
PACIFIC ARROYO
• VERBENA
(Detached Townhouses)
• FUCHSIA
(Single-Family Detached)
SOUTH OF LOS
ANGELES AVENUE
AND EAST OF
MAUREEN LANE
APPROVED, NOT
YET UNDER
CONSTRUCTION
284 SINGLE FAMILY
RESIDENCES
37.09
CITY VENTURES
MICHELLE THRAKULCHAVEE
3121 MICHELSON DRIVE #150
IRVINE, CA 92612
949-258-7536
michellet@cityventures.com
VISTAS AT MOORPARK EAST OF WALNUT
CANYON ROAD,
NORTH OF WICKS
ROAD
APPROVED, NOT
YET UNDER
CONSTRUCTION
110 SINGLE FAMILY
RESIDENCES
72
SPRING ROAD, LLC
MIKE ASHLEY/DON DUNCAN
5300 WHITMAN ROAD,
HIDDEN HILLS, CA 91302
818-888-6469
mike@aci5300.com
4875 SPRING ROAD
AND 384 LOS
ANGELES AVENUE
APPROVED, NOT
YET UNDER
CONSTRUCTION
95 UNIT
TOWNHOUSE
CONDOMINIUM
8
ESSEX MOORPARK, L.P.
BOB LINDER
17461 DERIAN AVE #110
IRVINE, CA, 92614
949-929-8407
blinder@essex.com
ESSEX MOORPARK
APARTMENTS
SOUTH OF CASEY
ROAD AND WEST OF
WALNUT CANYON
ROAD
APPROVED, NOT
YET UNDER
CONSTRUCTION
200 APARTMENT
RESIDENCES
11
BIRDSALL GROUP, LLC
SCOTT BIRDSALL
2300 ALESSANDRO DRIVE
VENTURA, CA 93001
805-643-3200
scott@birdsall.io
CANYON CREST MARINE VIEW DRIVE,
EAST OF WALNUT
CANYON ROAD AT
CHAMPIONSHIP
DRIVE
APPROVED, NOT
YET UNDER
CONSTRUCTION
21 SINGLE FAMILY
RESIDENCES
42
APPROVED, NOT
YET UNDER CONSTRUCTION 710
2
196
APPLICANT / DEVELOPER COMMON PROJECT NAME LOCATION STATUS PROJECT DESCRIPTION ACRES (APPX.)
Not approved, but in review pipeline
ALDERSGATE INVESTMENT,
LLC
ERNEST MANSI / MATT MANSI
300 ESPLANADE DRIVE #430
OXNARD, CA 93036
805-988-4114
ernie@aldersgatehome.com
CASEY ROAD SENIOR
COMMUNITY
NORTH OF CASEY
ROAD AND WEST OF
WALNUT CANYON
ROAD
IN REVIEW
PROCESS
(Scheduled for
March 6 CC
consideration)
390-UNIT SENIOR
RETIREMENT
COMMUNITY
50
SUMMERLAND PARTNERS,
INC
MANNY KOZAR
12725 VENTURA BLVD. SUITE
D
STUDIO CITY, CA 91604
818-927-4130
manny@summerlandpartners.co
m
GREEN ISLAND VILLA 635 LOS ANGELES
AVENUE
IN REVIEW
PROCESS
69 TOWNHOUSE
CONDOMINIUMS
4
HITCH RANCH PARTNERS C/O DPS: DENNIS HARDGRAVE
651 VIA ALONDRA #714 CAMARILLO, CA 93012 805-484-8303 dennis@devplan.net
COMSTOCK HOMES HARRIET RAPISTA 2301 ROSECRANS AVE #1150 EL SEGUNDO, CA 90245 310-546-5781 X235 Hrapista@Comstock-
homes.com
HITCH RANCH SPECIFIC
PLAN
SPECIFIC PLAN AREA 1
NORTH OF UNION
PACIFIC RAILROAD
TRACKS AND WEST
OF TERMINUS OF
CASEY ROAD
IN REVIEW
PROCESS
755 SINGLE AND
MULTI-FAMILY
RESIDENCES
281
WEST POINTE HOMES
MOORPARK 67, LLC
JAMES RASMUSSEN
26500 WEST AGOURA ROAD
#652
CALABASAS, CA 91302
805-370-0165
james@rasmussendevelopment.
com
NORTH RANCH 5979 GABBERT ROAD IN REVIEW
PROCESS
133 SINGLE FAMILY
HOMES AND 5
ESTATE LOTS
68.26
JOHN C. CHIU, FLP-N
C/O JOHN NEWTON
159 MOONSONG COURT
MOORPARK, CA 93021
805-529-3494
newtoncnslt@msn.com
EVERETT STREET
TERRACES
NORTHEAST
CORNER OF
EVERETT STREET
AND WALNUT
CANYON ROAD
IN REVIEW
PROCESS
60 CONDOMINIUM
RESIDENCES
2
THE DALY GROUP
VINCE DALY
31255 CEDAR VALLEY DRIVE
#323
WESTLAKE VILLAGE, CA 91361
805-309-6100
vincedaly@icloud.com
HIGH STREET DEPOT 226 HIGH STREET IN REVIEW
PROCESS 91 APARTMENTS
AND 13,656
SQUARE FEET
COMMERCIAL
MIXED USE
2.15
Not approved, but in review pipeline 1503
3
197
Attachment 9
Planning Map of Units Built Since 2010 Census
12853-0027\2261170v11.doc 198
Planning Map of Units Built Since 2010 Census ATTACHMENT 9
199
Attachment 10
HOA Map
12853-0027\2261170v11.doc 200
ATTACHMENT 10 Moorpark Homeowners Associations 201
Attachment 11
Draft Ordinance
12853-0027\2261170v11.doc 202
ATTACHMENT 11
ORDINANCE NO. _____
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK,
CALIFORNIA, PROVIDING FOR THE ELECTION OF CITY
COUNCIL MEMBERS BY DISTRICTS WITH AN AT-LARGE
ELECTED MAYOR, ESTABLISHING THE BOUNDARIES
AND IDENTIFICATION NUMBER OF EACH DISTRICT,
ESTABLISHING THE ELECTION ORDER OF EACH
DISTRICT, AMENDING CHAPTER 2.08 (“MUNICIPAL
ELECTIONS”) OF THE MOORPARK MUNICIPAL CODE,
AND MAKING A DETERMINATION OF EXEMPTION
PURSUANT TO THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL
QUALITY ACT
WHEREAS, the City of Moorpark currently elects its four (4) City Council
Members and Mayor using an at-large election system, where candidates may reside in
any part of the City and each City Council Member and the Mayor are elected by the
voters of the entire City; and,
WHEREAS, pursuant to Elections Code Section 10010, a city that changes from
an at-large method of electing City Council Members to a district-based method of
electing City Council Members requires a total of five public hearings, which include: (1)
at least two public hearings regarding the composition of the districts before any draft
maps are drawn; (2) at least two public hearings following the release of draft district
maps; and (3) a final public hearing before an ordinance establishing the district-based
method of electing City Council Members is adopted; and,
WHEREAS, at a regular meeting of the Moorpark City Council held on October
11, 2018, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2018-3755, declaring the City
Council’s intent to transition from at-large to district-based City Council Member
elections, with a separately elected at-large Mayor; and,
WHEREAS, pursuant to Elections Code Section 10010(e)(3)(B), a prospective
plaintiff could not commence an action against the City to enforce the requirements of
the California Voting Rights Act of 2001 within ninety (90) days of the City Council’s
adoption of Resolution No. 2018-3755. In addition, pursuant to Elections Code Section
10010(e)(3)(C), on October 11, 2018, the City Council entered into a tolling agreement
with the law firm of Shenkman & Hughes to extend by an additional ninety (90) days the
period of time by which the City could conduct public outreach, encourage public
participation, and receive public input in connection with district-based elections.
WHEREAS, pursuant to Elections Code Section 10010(a)(1), on November 13,
2018 and December 12, 2018, the City held public hearings where the public was
invited to provide input regarding the composition of the districts before any draft maps
were drawn; and,
203
WHEREAS, on January 16, 2019, January 18, 2019, and January 30, 2019, the
City published and made available for release approximately twenty-four (24), three (3),
and thirty-six (36) draft maps, respectively, and the potential sequencing of the district
elections for such maps, which were prepared by the public and the City’s professional
demographer. Pursuant to Elections Code Section 10010(a)(2), these maps were
published at least seven (7) days before consideration at a public hearing; and,
WHEREAS, at a special meeting of the Moorpark City Council held on January
23, 2019, and a regular meeting of the Moorpark City Council held on February 6, 2019,
pursuant to Elections Code Section 10010(a)(2), the City Council held public hearings
where the public was invited to provide input regarding the content of the draft maps
that had been released at least seven (7) days before each meeting, and the proposed
sequence of elections, and the City Council considered and discussed the same; and,
WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the public hearing held on February 6, 2019, the
City Council considered this Ordinance adopting the district map known as Map ____
with Districts __ and ___ holding elections in 2020 and every four years thereafter, and
Districts ___ and ___ holding elections in 2022 and every four years thereafter.
Thereafter, the City Council introduced this Ordinance for first reading; and,
WHEREAS, at a regular meeting of the Moorpark City Council held on March 6,
2019, pursuant to Elections Code Section 10010(a), the City Council held a final public
hearing on the proposal to establish the district boundaries and sequencing for the
election of City Council Members, read this Ordinance for the second time, and
approved this Ordinance adopting Map ___, with Districts __ and ___ holding elections
in 2020 and every four years thereafter, and Districts ___ and ___ holding elections in
2022 and every four years thereafter, and retaining the directly elected at-large office of
Mayor; and,
WHEREAS, throughout the foregoing process, the City engaged a significant
amount of public outreach and engagement above and beyond the minimum
requirements of the California Voting Rights Act of 2001, including substantial
participation by the public in drafting proposed district maps.
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK DOES ORDAIN AS
FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. This Ordinance is adopted with respect to the following purposes
and findings:
(a) Pursuant to California Government Code Sections 34871, 34886
and Elections Code Section 10010, the City Council votes to approve the change to a
district-based election system for the four City Council Members whereby all four of
those City Council Members shall be elected by the voters of four City Council districts
-2-
204
rather than at-large. The office of Mayor shall remain a separately elected at-large
office.
(b) Pursuant to California Government Code Section 34886, it is
declared the change in the method of electing members of the City Council of the City of
Moorpark made by this Ordinance is in furtherance of the purposes of the California
Voting Rights Act of 2001.
(c) Providing for the election of City Council Members by districts and
establishing the district boundaries is exempt from review under the California
Environmental Quality Act pursuant to Section 15061(B)(3) of the State CEQA
Guidelines, because it can be seen with certainty that the change will not have any
potentially significant adverse impact on the environment.
SECTION 2. Chapter 2.08 (“Municipal Elections”) of Title 2 (“Administration and
Personnel”) of the Moorpark Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows:
“Chapter 2.08
MUNICIPAL ELECTIONS
Sections:
2.08.010 Procedure for Holding Elections.
2.08.020 At-Large Election of Mayor.
2.08.030 City Council Districts Established.
2.08.040 Election of City Council Members by District.
2.08.050 Election Sequence.
2.08.060 Adjustment of City Council District Boundaries.
2.08.010 Procedure for Holding Elections.
All city municipal elections shall be held in accordance with the election laws of
the state of California, as the same now exists or hereafter may be amended, for the
holding of municipal elections.
2.08.020 At-Large Election of Mayor.
The Mayor shall be a separately elected at-large office, as required by Measure
D, approved by the voters of Moorpark on November 8, 1988.
2.08.030 City Council Districts Established.
Four City Council districts are hereby established in the City of Moorpark. The
boundaries and identifying number of each district shall be as described on the official
“Council District Map” on file in the Office of the City Clerk.
2.08.040 Election of City Council Members by District.
-3-
205
A. Commencing with the November 2020 general municipal election, City
Council Members shall be elected “by districts” as defined in California Government
Code Section 34871. Except for the Mayor, a person shall not be eligible to be elected
as a City Council Member unless he or she is otherwise qualified as required by law,
resides in the geographical area making up the district from which he or she is
nominated to be elected and is a registered voter of the City of Moorpark at the time
nomination papers are issued to the candidate as provided in California Elections Code
Section 10227. No term of any City Council Member that commenced on or prior to the
effective date of this Chapter, as amended, shall be affected by the requirements of this
Section prior to the expiration date of the City Council Member’s current term.
B. Registered voters signing nomination papers or voting for a City Council
Member shall be residents of the geographical area making up the district from which
the Member is to be elected.
C. The terms of the office of the Mayor and each City Council Member are
set forth in Section 2.04.045.
2.08.050 Election Sequence.
Commencing with the General Municipal Election in November of 2020 and
thereafter, the voters in Council Districts __ and __ shall elect City Council Members by
district for full four (4) year terms and the Mayor shall be elected at large for a two (2)
year term. At the general municipal election in 2022 and thereafter, the voters in
Council Districts __ and __ shall elect City Council Members by district for full four (4)
year terms and the Mayor shall be elected at large for a two (2) year term.
2.08.060 Adjustment of City Council District Boundaries.
A. Pursuant to Elections Code Section 21601, following each decennial
federal census, and using that census as a basis, the City Council shall adjust the
boundaries of any or all of the council districts of the City so that the council districts
shall be nearly equal in population and shall comply with all applicable provisions of law.
Any adjustment of district boundaries shall be made by ordinance adopted by the City
Council before the first day of November of the year following the year in which each
decennial federal census is taken commencing with the 2020 federal census. The City
Council shall hold a public hearing on the proposed district boundaries as required by
Elections Code Section 21607 prior to the introduction of an ordinance adjusting the
district boundaries.
B. At the time of any annexation of territory to the City, the City Council shall
designate, by resolution adopted by a vote of at least a majority of the City Council, the
contiguous district to which the annexed territory shall be a part and shall amend the
district boundaries if necessary in accordance with Elections Code Section 21603.
C. Pursuant to Elections Code Section 21606 the term of office of any City
Council Member who has been elected and whose term of office has not expired shall
-4-
206
not be affected by any change in the boundaries of the district from which he or she was
elected.
D. At the first election for City Council following adjustment of the boundaries
of the districts, a person meeting the requirements of Government Code Section 34882
shall be elected to the City Council for each district under the readjusted district plan
that has the same district number as a district whose incumbent’s term on the City
Council is due to expire.”
SECTION 3. The official “Council District Map” referenced in Section 2.08.030 of
the Moorpark Municipal Code is hereby approved and is attached hereto as Exhibit “A”
to this Ordinance and incorporated herein by this reference. The official “Council
District Map” shall be kept on file in the Office of the City Clerk.
SECTION 4. If necessary to facilitate the implementation of this Ordinance, the
City Clerk is authorized to make technical adjustments to the district boundaries that do
not substantively affect the populations of the districts, the eligibility of candidates, or
the residence of elected City Council Members within any district. The City Clerk shall
consult with the City Manager and City Attorney concerning any technical adjustments
deemed necessary and shall advise the City Council of any such adjustments required
in the implementation of the districts.
SECTION 5. To the extent the terms and provisions of this Ordinance may be
inconsistent or conflict with the terms of conditions of any prior City ordinance, motion,
resolution, rule, or regulation government the same subject, the terms of this Ordinance
shall prevail with respect to the subject matter thereof.
SECTION 6. This Ordinance shall become effective thirty (30) days after its
passage and adoption.
SECTION 7. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, part or portion
of this Ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by any court of
competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining
portions of this Ordinance. The City Council declares that it would have adopted this
Ordinance and each section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, part or portion
thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more section, subsections, sentences,
clauses, phrases, parts or portions be declared invalid or unconstitutional.
SECTION 8. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this
ordinance; shall enter the same in the book of original ordinances of said City; shall
make a written record of the passage and adoption thereof in the minutes of the
proceedings of the City Council at which the same is passed and adopted; and shall
publish notice of adoption in the manner required by law.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this ____ day of __________, 2019.
-5-
207
Janice S. Parvin, Mayor
ATTEST:
Maureen Benson, City Clerk
-6-
208
EXHIBIT “A”
Official Council District Map
[TO BE INSERTED AFTER CITY COUNCIL SELECTION OF DISTRICT MAP]
-7-
209
Presented by Kevin G. Ennis, City Attorney
City of Moorpark’s 4th Public
Hearing on the Transition from an
“At-large” to a “District-based”
Election System
2.6.19
1
Purposes and goals of this meeting
Background on the steps and actions taken by City prior to
tonight’s hearing
Review next steps and upcoming schedule
Overview of
•Agenda packet materials – including maps and charts
•Districting principles and criteria
•Use of Census Blocks and population numbers
•Growth of the City since 2010 Census
•Election sequencing principles
•Gerrymandering definition
Staff Recommendations
Overview of Presentation
2
Review what has been accomplished
Review what still needs to be done to complete the
districting process
Learn more about districting principles and criteria
Take additional public comments on preferred district
maps and sequencing of district elections
Meeting Purposes and Goals
3
Council discussion, consideration and direction on
which maps best meet districting principles and City
Council’s preferred criteria
Narrow pool of maps for further consideration
Provide staff direction on the upcoming schedule for
hearings and actions
Meeting Purposes and Goals
4
Since the City’s incorporation in 1983, Councilmembers
have been elected through an "at-large" election
system
Council candidates can reside anywhere in the City and
are elected by the registered voters of the entire City
Office of Mayor is a separate, directly elected office
rather than a “rotating” mayor
Office of Mayor became a directly elected office in
1988 upon passage of a voter approved ballot measure
Current Moorpark “At-Large” Election System
5
August 2018, City received a letter from Kevin Shenkman, an
attorney representing the “Southwest Voter Registration Project”
Letter claims the City's “at-large” elections violate the CVRA
Letter alleges that voting within Moorpark is racially polarized,
resulting in minority vote dilution
Letter highlights the electoral losses of City Council candidates
Ernesto Acosta in 1998, Bernardo Perez in 2002, and Jose Magdalano
in 2008 as evidence of the inability of Latino voters to elect their
chosen candidates
Letter threatens a lawsuit if the City does not change from an “at-
large” election system to a “district-based” election system
Assertions Against Current System
6
On October 3, 2018 and October 11, 2018, the City
Council heard detailed presentations into the law and
procedures required under the CVRA
On October 11, 2018, the City Council adopted a
Resolution of Intention to consider the transition to a
district based election system while retaining the Office
of Mayor as a separately elected at large office
The Council also approved an Agreement with Mr.
Shenkman that extended the timelines from 90 days to
180 days for the Council to consider and potentially
complete the process (until April 9, 2019)
Resolution of Intention
7
So far, the City has:
•Held two “public hearings” (community meetings) with
−the 1st public hearing on November 13, 2018 and
−the 2nd public hearing on December, 12, 2018
•At these public hearings, the public was invited to provide input
regarding district composition and preferred maps
•These were organized and run as community meetings
•As a result, the City’s demographer drew an initial set of 5 maps
and the community submitted an initial set of 19 maps
Steps Accomplished Since October 11, 2018
8
The City Council held its first public hearing (3rd public
hearing overall) on the proposed district maps and
sequencing
Heard public testimony on the retention of the position of a
directly elected mayor, the number of proposed council
districts and preferred maps
Council voted to retain the current election system of a
directly-elected Mayor and four councilmembers rather than
five councilmembers and a “rotating” mayor
Provided input into districting principles and preferred maps
City Council’s January 23, 2019 Public Hearing
9
Tonight is the City Council’s 2nd public hearing (and 4th public
hearing overall)
Hear from your demographer regarding an overview of districting
principles, the process, and the maps that Councilmembers directed
to be the focus of today’s hearing as well as additional maps
submitted
Hear public testimony on preferred maps and sequencing
Discuss and consider maps and provide additional direction on
which maps should be considered further
Goal: narrow pool of maps for consideration at an upcoming and 5th
public hearing so that a map can potentially be selected and
Ordinance introduced at the conclusion of that hearing
Tonight’s Public Hearing
10
Agree on schedule for next steps (upcoming public hearing
dates)
Direction on whether to accept additional proposed maps
after tonight’s hearing
At the conclusion of one of those upcoming public hearings,
introduce (give first reading to) an Ordinance adopting a
district map with how those district elections will be
sequenced
Before April 9, 2019, hold a final public hearing and adopt
(give second reading to) the Ordinance at a Regular Meeting
(March 6th or March 20th) or at and adjourned Regular
Meeting
Next Steps
11
Staff Report provides detailed information about the
process and various districting principles
Summarizes and categorizes maps into
•maps previously directed for further council focused review
•maps that are new and revised
•maps that no longer meet Council direction
Provides maps and charts on Census Blocks,
populations in each area, where new homes have been
built, the location of HOAs
Information about the schedule and
a draft ordinance
Agenda Materials
12
Nearly equal population in each district (total
population and not registered voters) and to be as close
to 0% deviation as possible
•Up to 10% is considered “presumptively constitutional”
Not dividing any neighborhood made up of a significant
number of “protected class” voters (Latinos)
Not using race as the predominant factor in how lines
are drawn
Consideration of topography, geography, cohesiveness,
contiguity, compactness and
communities of interests
Districting Criteria and Principles
13
2010 Census data is used to ensure compliance with the
equal population of districts criteria
Data comes in geographical units called Census Blocks
Attachment 2 has maps showing the location and
populations of the City’s Population Units which are
made up of smaller Census Blocks
If City deviates from Census Block use, risk increases as
to the reliability of data to demonstrate compliance with
the equal population requirement
City may have an ability to have input into Census
Blocks used for 2020 Census
Census Blocks, Population Numbers and Block Splits
14
Based on community and councilmember comments, staff
has quantified how many housing units have been
constructed since the 2010 Census and where those units are
generally located
Attachments 8 and 9 (to Staff Report) provide that data
Projections could be made based on occupancy
assumptions of those units
•risk that such assumptions will be inaccurate and not yield sufficiently
reliable data to meet the equal population requirement
Post 2010 Growth and Future Growth of the City
15
Deciding which districts would hold elections in which years is
referred to as “sequencing”
All Councilmembers elected to a four-year term prior to the
adoption of the district map and sequencing plan will still
serve their original four-year term
None of the incumbents are automatically assigned as the
representative of the district in which they live
•they remain “at large” incumbents for the rest of their terms
If an incumbent wants to run for reelection, they would then
have to run in their district for the district seat when that seat is
sequenced for an election
Sequencing District Elections
16
Since the Council currently has two Council seats up for
election in 2020 and two seats up in 2022, there must be
two seats up for election in 2020 and two seats up for
election in 2022 under sequencing plan
The CVRA provides that when deciding which districts
should have an election first (in 2020), the City Council
shall give special consideration to the purpose of the
CVRA – empowering protected class voters
Sequencing District Elections
17
Racial gerrymandering: drawing district lines on the
basis of race
Partisan gerrymandering: not legally defined but is
generally considered to be when district lines are drawn
to include, exclude or dilute voters of particular political
parties and done for partisan purposes
Separating current officeholders into separate districts is
not regarded as “gerrymandering” because it allows
voters to decide which officeholders they want to
reelect rather than precluding one or more of them from
the potential for re-election
“Gerrymandering” Definition
18
Hear a presentation from NDC regarding these
principles and review of the maps
Take public testimony
Discuss and deliberate on preferred maps and
sequencing options
Narrow the remaining pool of maps for future focus at
the next public hearing
Provide direction on whether additional maps may or
may not be submitted for future consideration
Staff Recommendations and Next Steps
19
Consider modification of timeline to add a continued public
hearing date of February 21, 2019
At the conclusion of tonight’s hearing, continue the hearing
and this item to an adjourned regular meeting to be held on
February 21, 2019 at 6:30 p.m.
At the conclusion of hearing on February 21 or March 6, 2019
introduce (give first reading to) an Ordinance adopting a
district map with how those district elections will be
sequenced
Before April 9, 2019, adopt (give second reading to) the
Ordinance.
Staff Recommendation (cont.)
20
21
2.6.19 Moorpark City Council Meeting
City of Moorpark
Hearing on Proposed Maps
February 6, 2019
Districting Rules
Equal Population
Federal Voting Rights Act
No Racial Gerrymandering
Communities of interest
Compact
Contiguous
Visible (Natural & man-made)
boundaries
Respect voters’ choices /
continuity in office
Planned future growth
Federal Laws Traditional Redistricting Principles
2
February 6, 2019
Quick Clarification on Geography
3
February 6, 2019
Population Units: groupings of Census Blocks
drawn to provide flexibility to residents drawing
maps without overwhelming the map-drawer with
numbers they have to add up. On our computers,
we can split Population Units as long as the split
follows Census Block lines.
Census Blocks: the smallest unit of geography that has official
Census population data. In densely populated areas, each city
block is a Census Block. But where there are hills and cul de
sac’s, the Bureau tends to draw big, odd Census Blocks. If we
divide a heavily populated Census Block, the population balance
of the entire map can be legally questionable.
Proposed Maps
February 6, 2019
4
27 maps received from the public
5 maps added to the mix by NDC
9 maps revised per Council instruction (the “a” maps)
Population-balanced map 406
Adjusted maps to have all districts touch Los Angeles Ave
(and the Arroyo, if possible)
Result: 14 current “focus” maps
Plus four non-compliant maps that have not been addressed
by Council yet
Goal tonight: narrow down to between one to three
“Live” but not population balanced
or otherwise non-compliant
416 (not population balanced)
417 (not population balanced)
426 (not contiguous)
526 (five districts)
February 6, 2019
5
Maps with a ‘Central’ district I of II
February 6, 2019
6
Maps with a ‘Central’ district II of II
February 6, 2019
7
“Quadrant” Maps I of II
February 6, 2019
8
“Quadrant” Maps II of II
February 6, 2019
9
*
“Vertical” Maps
February 6, 2019
10
Steps for Tonight
February 6, 2019
11
1.Public comment
2.Council discussion
Can use the interactive review map to look in detail
3.Select map(s) to carry forward
4.Give any direction on edits/changes to those carry-
forward maps
Interactive review map