Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAGENDA REPORT 2002 0403 CC REG ITEM 10CITEM 0- • C CI FY 101tr MOORP,1Rk, C.1I,IFOWNIA City C'onned tiiee,ing rf 1 "a OCa AC:TIpN:(19 P IQVv �A !L e)h mo& CITY OF MOORPARK kvnj16j -Q Vg , ;jAkyh mwak I J= replace CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT IT lveli 3 µa }ham?tcmr BY:- TO: The Honorable City Council ! FROM: Mary K. Lindley, Director of Community Services DATE: March 19, 2002 (CC Meeting of April 3, 2002) SUBJECT: Consider the Review of the Moorpark Municipal Code Sections 12.08 and 12.12, Regarding Trees and the Peach Hill HOA Tree Removal Request At the City Council's request, this agenda item is presented to initiate a review of the City's tree polices. It is proposed that the Council establish an Ad Hoc Committee to review appropriate Municipal Code sections and return to the full Council with a recommendation. Additionally, the City is in receipt of a request from the Peach Hill Homeowners Association to remove a significant number of trees over time. Since the two issues are related, it is also proposed that the aforementioned proposed committee review the Association request concurrently with the review of the Municipal Code. BACKGROUND At its March 6, 2002, meeting, the City Council requested that staff agendize a review of the City's Municipal Code in regards to trees. The City addresses trees in two section of the Municipal Code: Section 12.08, Trees, Shrubs and Plants; and Section 12.12, Historic Trees, Native Oak Trees and Mature Trees. The two Code sections are summarized as follows: Municipal Code Section 12.08, Trees, Shrubs and Plants: This section identifies the City's desire to E:\MLindley \Landscp Zones \tree ordinance ccagda.doc C ;; ;; J Tree Removal Report Page 2 preserve all trees in the City, including, but not limited to, trees which are creating damage to surface improvements or underground facilities or which are diseased, or located where construction is considered. The Code Section goes on to identify individuals responsible for trees on public and private property and the process the City shall undertake to gain compliance from private property owners. (see Attachment A) Municipal Code Section 12.12, Historic Trees, Native Oak and Mature Trees: This section identifies the City's desire to protect and preserve mature, native and historic trees where possible, and covers trees on public and private property and within urban developments (development projects). Generally, the Section states that no mature, native, or historic tree may be removed without an approved tree permit (except trees in rear and side yard not abutting a public street) . Tree removals may be granted for the following reasons: a) the condition of the tree poses a danger; b) the removal is necessary to construct improvements which allow economic enjoyment of the property; c) the number of historic, mature, or native trees existing in the neighborhood is sufficient; d) good forestry practices support the removal; e) to facilitate construction of required improvements in the right -of -way; f) suitability of the tree species in a specific area. (see Attachment B) During the 2001 calendar year, the City processed 80 tree removal permits. An additional 14 tree removal requests were denied. A copy of the City's tree removal permit is attached to this report (Attachment C). Occasionally, we receive reports that trees have been removed without City consideration. In these cases, staff attempts to secure the owners cooperation to plant a replacement tree. While the Code states that a violation of Chapter 12.12 is a misdemeanor, the City has not prosecuted violators. Tree Removal Request The City is in receipt of a request from the Peach Hill Homeowners Association (See Attachment D) requesting approval for the removal of 64 Eucalyptus trees. According to the HOA, within the property of the Association there are 131 existing Eucalyptus trees. The trees create an n F1.n, s� ,�r ►-� E:\MLindley \Landscp Zones \tree ordinance ccagda.doc..y ... Tree Removal Report Page 3 abundance of shade and debris, and the maintenance of the trees is expensive. The HOA is proposing to remove the trees in phases over the next three to four years. As background, in 1989 the HOA requested removal of 88 Eucalyptus trees throughout the tract. The City Council approved the request. City staff has inspected the HOA trees in the area between Quail Summit Road and the back of Peach Hill School. Additionally, the City had these trees reviewed by a licensed arborist. The trees proposed for removal by the HOA in the other greenbelt areas within the HOA property have not been reviewed by the City. While most of the trees in the aforementioned area have been heavily pruned and topped, and as a result they have significant sucker growth, they are all healthy and do not appear to pose a concern of failing, nor do they interfere with existing property improvements. However, it is acknowledged that a majority of the trees are close to back property lines of the residences and that in some cases they block the sun and create some maintenance obligations on the part of the HOA and individual homeowners from falling bark and leaves. DISCUSSION Because of the Council's interest in reviewing City tree policies and the receipt of the Peach Hill HOA's tree removal request, staff recommends that discussion of these two issues be combined. To assist with the Council's efforts, it is proposed that a Council Ad Hoc Committee of two Councilmembers and City staff be formed. The Ad Hoc Committee would present its recommendation to the full Council at a future meeting. With regards to the tree removals in the area adjacent to Peach Hill School, staff recommends allowing the HOA to remove 10 trees, provided the HOA plants '10 new trees of a different species than Eucalyptus (possibly Oak) in the general area of the existing Eucalyptus, but further back from the residential property line. Staff would approve the specific trees to be removed and the species and location of the 10 replacement trees. This is consistent with the City's current Municipal Code. ,r, E:\MLindley \Landscp Zones \tree ordinance ccagda.doc C `., Tree Removal Report Page 4 As an option, the City Council could choose to direct the postponement of any tree removals concerning the Peach Hill Homeowners Association until the Ad Hoc Committee has had an opportunity to review the entire phased request. As stated above, the trees do not pose increased hazard and a delay in the City's decision can be accommodated. RECOMMENDATION Appoint two Councilmembers to serve on an Ad Hoc Committee to review the Moorpark Municipal Code Sections 12.08 and 12.12, and concur with staff's intent to approve the removal of 10 Eucalyptus trees adjacent to the back of Peach Hill School and the Peach Hill Homeowners Association's obligation to plant 10 replacement trees, species and location to be approved by staff. Attachments: A - MMC 12.08 B - MMC 12.12 C - Tree Removal Permit D - Peach Hill HOA Leter ,r*� � E:\MLindley \Landscp Zones \tree ordinance ccagda.doc C— or impairs the sight distance for safe pedestrian or vehicular traffic. (Ord. 6 § 16 (part), 1983) 12.04.930 Maintenance of plantings. The permittee shall maintain hedges, shrubs or other plantings and fences or similar structures in a neat and orderly condition. If the encroachment is not so maintained the commissioner may direct the permittee to remove the encroachment and restore the right -of -way to its former condition at the expense of the permittee. (Ord. 6 § 16 (part), 1983) Article VIII. Appeals and Penalties 12.04.940 Appeals. A. Any person aggrieved by the refusal or revocation of a permit may appeal to the board of supervisors within thirty (30) days after the date of such action. The appeal shall be in the form of a written notice filed with the clerk of the board of supervisors and signed by the applicant. The notice shall have attached a copy of the application as filed with the commissioner, shall recite such other items as have been filed, and shall state clearly and concisely the grounds upon which the applicant relies in his appeal. B. The clerk of the board of supervisors shall set the matter for hearing fifteen (15) days after the notice is filed, and shall notify the applicant and the commissioner of the setting. C. At the hearing, the applicant shall establish to the satisfaction of the board that he is entitled to issuance of a permit under this chapter or to reinstatement of a permit previously revoked. The commissioner may present his grounds for denial or revocation of the permit. The decision of the board is final. (Ord. 6 § 16 (part), 1983) 12.04.950 Violation — Penalty. Every person who performs any work regulated by this chapter, either without first obtaining a permit therefor from the commissioner or having a permit, fails or refuses to comply with any applicable provisions of this chapter with any condition of the permit or performs work contrary to any of the general or special requirements or specifications of the permit, is guilty of a misdemeanor, and is guilty of a separate offense for every day during any part of which such violation occurs. (Ord. 6 § 16 (part), 1983) 227 ATTACHMENT-A 12.04.920 Chapter 12.08 TREES, SHRUBS AND PLANTS Sections: 12.08.010 City policy. 12.08.020 Enforcement and implementation authority. 12.08.030 Trees on public property— Responsibility. 12.08.040 Trees on private property— Responsibility. 12.08.050 Diseased or infested trees — Removal or replacement. 12.08.060 Prohibited acts. 12.08.070 Native plants. 12.08.080 Plantings on public property. 12.08.090 Interference with visibility at intersections prohibited. 12.08.100 Excavations or street work — Protection of trees. 12.08.110 Development landscape fee. 12.08.120 Nonliability of city. 12.08.130 Appeals. 12.08.010 City policy. Consistent with Chapter 12.12 of this title regulating the preservation, cutting and removal of historic trees, native oak trees and mature trees and with Resolution 88 -520 setting forth Guidelines for a Master Tree Plan, it shall be the city's policy to utilize whatever techniques, methods and procedures are required to preserve, whenever feasible, all trees in the city including, but not limited to, trees which are creating damage to surface improvements or under- ground facilities or which are diseased, or located where construction is being considered or will occur. (Ord. 102 § 1 (part), 1988) 12.08.020 Enforcement and implementation authority. The director of community services ( "director") shall enforce, implement and carry out the policy, provisions and regulations of this chapter in a manner which is consis- tent with other established policies of the city. (Ord. 102 § 1 (part), 1988) 12.08.030 Trees on public property— Responsibility. The director of community services shall be responsible for the preservation of, and when required, the removal of all trees on public property. (Ord. 102 § 1 (part), 1988) -a 12.08.040 12.08.040 Trees on private property— Responsibility. A. It shall be the responsibility of the property owner or the occupant to prevent any tree, shrub or plant on his private property from overhanging or projecting into public property. The director shall have the authority to require the property owner or the occupant to prune, trim, cut down or remove any such tree, shrub or plant, or parts thereof, if it appears to the director to be dead, liable to fall, danger- ous, an obstruction to public travel, or is not pruned or trimmed to a height of fourteen (14) feet, six (6) inches above the paved portion of the street to accommodate such vehicles as garbage trucks, buses, moving vans and street maintenance trucks. Except in a case of manifest public danger and immediate necessity, no such tree, shrub or plant shall be pruned, trimmed, cut down or removed by the director unless the director has given the property owner and the occupant ten (10) days' written notice to take corrective action. If the necessary corrective action is not taken by the property owner or his occupant within (10) days, the director shall perform the services and the cost thereof shall be assessed to the property owner, including the cost of labor (including overhead), equipment and materials. B. It shall be the responsibility of the property owner or his occupant to treat or remove any tree, shrub, plant, grass or other vegetation on his private property, if it is so diseased or insect- infected as to constitute a hazard to other trees, shrubs or plants. The director shall have the authority to require the property owner or the occupant to take such action as is necessary to control insects, scales, parasites, fungi and other injurious pests or diseases. The director shall notify the property owner and the occupant in writing, describing the conditions, stating the control necessary for correction, and provide thirty (30) days within which the required steps must be taken. If the property owner or the occupant questions the necessity for such action, the director shall refer the matter to a plant patholo- gist whose decision shall be final. If necessary corrective action is not taken within the time specified, the director is authorized in the public interest, to enter on the property in question and to spray, trim, prune or treat or remove all or any part of the tree, shrub, plant, grass or other vegetation determined to be infested or diseased. The charge assessed to the property owner shall be equal to the cost of labor (including overhead), equipment and materials. Nothing in this section prevents the director from taking immediate action for removal if he determines that such action is necessary for the public health, safety or welfare. (Ord. 102 § I (part), 1988) 12.08.050 Diseased or infested trees — Removal or replacement. A. If any tree on public property is infected or infested with insects, pests or disease, the director shall cause such condition to be treated or, if any such tree is infected or infested to such a degree that the condition cannot be eradicated by treatment, the director may order the removal and/or replacement of the tree. B. The director, after unsuccessfully utilizing all techniques, methods and procedures which he deems reason- able to save trees planted on public property which are dead, dying, in a dangerous condition, unsafe or likely to cause damage, shall remove and/or replace such trees. (Ord. 102 § 1 (part), 1988) 12.08.060 Prohibited acts. No person, except authorized city personnel, shall remove, destroy, deface or injure any tree on public property by any means including, but not limited to, the following: A. By pouring any material on any tree or on the ground which would be harmful to the tree; B. By attaching any sign or notice or other object on any tree or fastening any guy wire, cable, rope, nails or screws or any other device to any tree, except that agencies may, under the supervision of the director, temporarily affix no- parking signs to trees when necessary in con- junction with activities in the public interest, such as street improvement work, tree maintenance work or parades; C. By causing or encouraging any unnecessary fire or burning near or around any tree; D. By constructing a concrete, asphalt, brick or gravel surface, or otherwise covering the ground within a one (1) foot radius of any tree so as to shut off air or water from the roots, except under written authority from the director. (Ord. 102 § 1 (part), 1988) 228 12.08.070 Native plants. It is unlawful for any person to dig up, pick, break off, cut or destroy any native tree, plant, berry- bearing shrub, fern or any wild flower, or to pick, break off or cut any bud, bloom or blossom from any of said plants, trees or shrubs within three hundred (300) feet of the middle of any leveled road or highway within the county, unless, in the case of private lands, the owner thereof gives his written consent thereto. (Ord. 6 § 14 (part), 1983) 12.08.080 Plantings on public property. A. No person shall plant any tree or any shrub or plant with a mature height in excess of thirty -six inches on any public property of the city without written permission from the director. B. Any tree, shrub or plant planted in violation of subsection A of this section may be removed by the direc- tor. The director shall notify the abutting property owner in writing, listing the unlawfully planted trees, shrubs or plants, ordering their removal, and provide thirty (30) days within which removal shall be accomplished. In the event removal is not accomplished within the specified time, the director is authorized to remove the trees, shrubs or plants and the cost thereof shall be assessed to the property owner. The charge assessed the property owner shall be equal to the cost of labor (including overhead), equipment and materials. (Ord. 102 § 1 (part), 1988) 12.08.090 Interference with visibility at intersections prohibited. No trees shall be planted within twenty (20) feet of the intersection of one county highway right -of -way line with another county highway right -of -way line. (Ord. 6 § 14 (part), 1983). 12.08.100 Excavations or street work — Protection of trees. A. Any tree growing upon public property near any excavation, construction or street work shall be sufficiently guarded and protected by those responsible for such work so as to prevent any injury to the tree. B. No person shall excavate any ditches, tunnels or trenches, or install pavement within a radius of four (4) feet from any tree on public property without the written permission of the director. (Ord. 102 § 1 (part), 1988) 12.08.110 Development landscape fee. A. The development of projects of residential, commer- cial and industrial nature removes land from its natural state and replaces the natural state and natural landscape with manmade structures. B. In order to ensure that there is a certain amount of landscape remaining in the city in the way of trees, plants and shrubs, the city shall impose a landscape fee on each new project in an amount to be determined by resolution of the city council. The fee shall be used for the installation, maintenance and replacement of trees, plants and shrubs on public property. C. Landscape work in the city will provide a benefit to those living and/or working in the new developments by preserving the visual environment and the air quality, both of which are impacted by new development. This fee is separate and distinct from any other fee imposed. (Ord. 102 § 1 (part), 1988) 229 12.08.080 12.08.120 Nonliability of city. Nothing in this chapter shall be deemed to impose any liability upon the city or upon any of its officers or employ- ees nor to relieve the owner and occupant of any private property from the duty to keep trees and shrubs upon private property or under his control or upon sidewalks and park- ways in front of such private property in a safe condition. (Ord. 102 § 1 (part), 1988) 12.08.130 Appeals. A. Any decision by the director shall be appealable by any aggrieved person to the city manager. B. An appeal of the city manager shall be appealable to the parks and recreation commission. Appeals of the commission shall be heard by the city council. C. All appeals shall be in writing, stating the decision appealed from and reasons for the appeal, and filed within ten (10) days of the decision being appealed. (Ord. 102 § 1 (part), 1988) V V V'�•J �1/ 12.12.010 Chapter 12.12 HISTORIC TREES, NATIVE OAK TREES AND MATURE TREES Sections: 12.12.010 Purpose of provisions. 12.12.020 Applicability of provisions. 12.12.030 Definitions. 12.12.040 Removal— Prohibitions. 12.12.050 Urban development proposals— Report guidelines. 12.12.060 Urban development proposals — Tree preservation guidelines. 12.12.070 Tree removal permits — Requirements. 12.12.080 Tree removal permits — Standards for grant or denial. 12.12.090 Exemptions. 12.12.100 Damaging of trees prohibited. 12.12.110 Liability. 12.12.120 Appeals. 12.12.130 Violation— Penalty. 12.12.010 Purpose of provisions. It is the determination of the council that proper and necessary steps should be taken in order to protect and preserve, to the greatest extent possible, mature trees, native oak trees and historic trees, especially where such trees are associated with proposals for urban development, as such trees are a significant, historical, aesthetic and valuable ecological resource. It is the intent of this chapter to main- tain and enhance the general health, safety and welfare of the citizens of the city by assisting in counteracting air pollution, by minimizing soil erosion and other related en- vironmental damage and by enhancing the aesthetic environ- ment of the city. (Ord. 101 § 1 (part), 1988) . 12.12.020 Applicability of provisions. The provisions of this chapter shall apply to all living historic trees, native oak trees and mature trees, including but not limited to, where those trees are associated with proposals for urban development, on all public or private property within the limits of the city, except as specified in Section 12.12.090 of this chapter. (Ord. 101 § 1 (part), 1988) 12.12.030 Definitions. For the purpose of this chapter, certain words and phrases used in this chapter shall be defined as follows: "Associated with a proposal for urban development" means any land area for which an application for an entitle- 230 ATTACHMENT ment, other than for a zone clearance, has been filed with and is pending consideration by the city. If such entitlement has been approved but the related project or applicable phase thereof has not been completed, the city shall attempt to work with the applicant to save as many trees which are protected by this chapter as possible. "Dripline" means the outermost edge of the tree's canopy. When depicted on a map, the dripline will appear as an irregular shaped circle that follows the contour of the tree's branches as seen from overhead. "Historic tree" means a living tree designated by reso- lution of the city council as an historic tree because of an association with some event or person of historical signifi- cance to the community or because of special recognition due to size, condition or aesthetic qualities. "Lot" means an area of land created or established for purposes of sale, lease, finance, division of interest or separate use, separated from other lands by description on a final map or parcel map. "Mature tree" means a living tree with a cross- sectional area of all major stems, as measured four and one -half (41/2) feet above the root crown, of seventy-two (72) or more square inches. "Native oak tree" means a living tree of the genus Quercus and species lobata, agrifolia, dumosa or hybrids thereof. (Ord. 101 § 1 (part), 1988) 12.12.040 Removal — Prohibitions. No native oak tree, historic tree or mature tree shall be removed, cut down, or otherwise destroyed, except as provided for in Sections 12.12.070 through 12.12.090. (Ord. 101 § 1 (part), 1988) 12.12.050 Urban development proposals — Report guidelines. A. Where one or more native oak trees, historic trees or mature trees are associated with any proposal for urban development, the director of community development or his or her designated representative, shall cause a report to be prepared on those trees, otherwise, tree removals (public and private) shall be processed through the commu- nity services department. B. An applicant for a proposal for urban development shall provide to the city the precise vertical and horizontal location within plus or minus one (1) foot of each mature tree on the subject parcel and the generalized locations of all mature trees within twenty (20) feet of the project boundary. C. Tree reports shall be prepared by an arborist, horti- culturist or registered landscape architect who are on a list approved by resolution of the city council. Tree reports shall include the following information: i, C If,# AF -\ #-% v� ti x043 1. Tree type by common name and genus and species; 2. The diameter of trunks or main stems as measured four and one -half (4' /x) feet above the root crown; 3. The average spread of each tree; 4. A letter grade for the health of each tree. Grades employed shall be "A" for outstanding, `B" for good, "C" for average, "D" for below average; 5. A letter grade for the aesthetic quality of each tree employing those grades defined in subsection (C)(4) of this section; 6. Disclosure of any significant disease or insect infestations, heart rot, fire, mechanical or wind damage; 7. Recommended tree surgery, chemical treatment or other remedial measures intended to improve the health, safety or life expectancy of the tree; 8. Appraisal value of each tree which shall be es- tablished and provided to the city using the most recent edition of the Guide for Establishing Values of Trees and Other Plants, prepared by the Council of Tree Landscape Appraisers. D. The director of community development, or his or her designated representative, may waive the requirement for a tree report or may waive the requirement for survey of one (1) or more trees based upon the director's judgment that the tree(s) would have little or no value in that location. (Ord. 101 § 1 (part), 1988) 12.12.060 Urban development proposals — Tree preservation guidelines. A. Initial project layout, design and grading shall recognize the desirability of preserving native oak trees, historic trees or mature trees with appropriate modifications and adjustments to accommodate preservation and mainte- nance by locating the best candidates in areas where preser- vation is feasible. Design of the grading and other improve- ments shall reflect consideration of the following safeguards: 1. Location in minimum growing areas as required by individual species; 2. No disruption or removal of structural feeder roots; 3. Fencing of trees at or beyond their driplines during grading and construction activities; 4. No filling, cutting, development or compaction of soils within the dripline; 5. Such other measures required by the species of tree to be preserved as recommended by the consulting arborist, horticulturist or landscape architect. B. It is recognized that the complete preservation of healthy trees may sometimes conflict with normal land developmental considerations such as proper drainage, grad- ing, circulation, safety and provision of utilities. Within a given development, it may not be practical to preserve all healthy trees, and therefore, the city and the developer 12.12.050 must be willing to compromise the goal of complete tree preservation in order to address other public safety and design concerns. In such instances, the design of the de- velopment must address preservation of the most desirable and significant of the healthy trees and the developer is encouraged to utilize creative land planning techniques to achieve this end. C. The planning commission of the city, when review- ing development plans, shall determine the adequacy and appropriateness of the proposed preservation plan. D. Following approval of such a development, the de- veloper shall submit grading, improvement and precise landscaping plans detailing the approved preservation plan. Such plans shall be approved by the city engineer and/or the director of community development, as appropriate. Prior to use inauguration, the preserved trees shall be trimmed for balance, structural integrity, ornamental ap- pearance and treated for any diseases. E. The precise vertical and horizontal locations plus or minus one (1) foot of all mature trees shall be shown on an exhibit as part of the initial application for any project unless that project would involve no exterior construction activities. (Ord. 101 § 1 (part), 1988) 231 12.12.070 Tree removal permits — Requirements. The appropriate department shall give priority to inspec- tion of those requests based upon hazardous conditions, and may refer any request to the appropriate commission for determination. A. Permit Required. No native oak tree, historic tree or other mature tree, where that tree is on public or private property, except as provided for in subsection B of this section, or is associated with a proposal for urban develop- ment, shall be removed, cut down, or otherwise destroyed, unless a tree removal permit has been issued by the city. The director of community services shall establish the format and information required for a tree removal permit consistent with this chapter. In no event shall a permit be denied if to do so would cause interference with the eco- nomic use and enjoyment of the property. B. Single Parcel Review Requirement. Permits for re- moval of trees on any single parcel shall be required from the appropriate commission or director or his designee as follows: 1. For any historic tree on the parcel; 2. For removal of one or more historic trees, mature trees or native oak trees when such trees are in the front yard, side yard or rear yard which abuts a public street. For purposes of this section only, "front yard" means that portion of the property extending from the front of a structure, forward to the front property line; the "side yard" A 12.12.070 means that portion of the property extending from the side of a structure in front to the rear property line; "rear yard" means that portion of the property extending from the rear of a structure backward to the rear property line, as shown in the following diagram: BACK YARD SIDE YARD SIDE YARD STRUCTURE FRONT YARD C. Site Inspection. Prior to the issuance of such permit, the appropriate director, or his or her designee, shall inspect the premises involved and shall designate the tree(s) to be removed or moved. Failure to provide access to the premises shall be grounds for denial of the permit. D. Project Approval Required. No tree removal permit shall be issued for the removal of any tree on any lot asso- ciated with a proposal for urban development unless the project has been approved by the city or unless the director of community development, or his or her designee, de- termines that the immediate removal of the tree is required because of the condition of the tree with respect to disease, danger of collapse of all or any portion of the tree, proximi- ty to an existing structure, or interference with utility ser- vices. E. Removal Not Associated with a Proposal for Urban Development. Where tree(s) are proposed for removal that are not associated with a proposal for urban development, the director of community services, or his or her designee, may condition a tree removal permit upon the replacement of the certain tree(s). Any applicant for a tree removal permit shall not be required to expend more on the replace- ment tree(s) than the appraised value of the tree(s) for which a permit is required. An appraisal shall be done in accor- dance with Section 12.12.050C. F. Removal Associated with a Proposal for Urban De- velopment. Where tree(s) are proposed for removal that are associated with a proposal for urban development, the director of community development, or his or her designee, shall cause an appraisal of the value of said tree(s) to be prepared in accordance with Section 12.12.050C. The resulting value shall be applied to upgrading the size of tree plantings associated with the project. Trees 232 for which no tree report has been required pursuant to Section 12.12.050D shall not be subject to appraisal or replacement by value. G. Tree Replacement Waiver. In no case shall an ap- plicant for a tree removal permit be required to replace or otherwise pay for the value of any tree which: 1. The city has directed the applicant to remove so that a public street may be constructed along an alignment determined or approved by the city engineer or adequate line -of -sight distance may be achieved in order to assure public safety; or 2. Removal was necessitated due to the health of the tree. (Ord. 107 § 1, 1989; Ord. 101 § I (part), 1988) 12.12.080 Tree removal permits — Standards for grant or denial. Determination by the city to issue a tree removal permit, shall be based upon the following criteria: A. The condition of the tree with respect to disease, danger of collapse of all or any portion of the tree, prox- imity to an existing structure, or interference with utility services or, in the case of a native oak tree, interference with an addition to an existing single - family detached home; B. The necessity to remove a historic tree, native oak tree or mature tree in order to construct improvements which allow economic enjoyment of the property; C. The number of historic trees, native oak trees and mature trees existing in the neighborhood; D. Good forestry practices, i.e., the number of healthy mature trees that a given parcel of land will support; E. Whether or not removal of the tree is necessary to construct required improvement within the public street right -of -way or within a flood control or utility right -of- way; and F. The suitability of the tree species for use in that location. (Ord. 101 § 1 (part), 1988) 12.12.090 Exemptions. The following are exempt from the provisions of this chapter: A. Emergency Situation. Cases of emergency where the director of community services or his or her designee, or any member of a law enforcement agency or the Ventura County Fire Protection District, in the performance of his or her duties, determines that a tree poses an imminent threat to the public safety, or general welfare. If conditions and circumstances permit, the public official shall consult with the director of community development, or his or her designee, prior to ordering the removal of any mature tree; B. Traffic Engineer. Removal or relocation of trees necessary to obtain adequate line -of -sight distances as required by the city traffic engineer; v v v.•aJ C. Public Improvement Damage. Removal of trees from within public right -of -way, which in the opinion of the director of public works, or his or her designee, will cause damage to existing public improvements; D. Public Utility Damage. Actions taken for the pro- tection of existing electrical power or communication lines or other property of a public utility; E. Trees for Sale. Trees planted, grown or held for sale by a private individual or nursery; F. Pruning and Trimming. Pruning or trimming which does not endanger the life of the tree. (Ord. 101 § 1 (part), 1988) 12.12.100 Damaging of trees prohibited. No person shall injure, deface or scar any historic tree, native oak tree or mature tree. (Ord. 101 § 1 (part), 1988) 12.12.110 Liability. Nothing in this chapter shall be deemed to impose any liability or duty upon the city or upon any of its officers, employees or agents, nor to relieve the owner and occupant of any private property from the duty to keep historic trees, mature trees or native oak trees upon such property or under his control, in a safe condition. (Ord. 101 § i (part), 1988) 12.12.120 Appeals. A. Decisions relating to proposals for urban develop- ment which are made by the director of community develop- ment may be appealed to the planning commission. Such appeal procedures shall be those specified in Article 11 of the zoning ordinance of the city. B. Decisions relating to single parcels which are made by the director of community services may be appealed to the parks and recreation commission under its normal procedures of appeal; however, in no event shall the fee for appeal exceed fifty dollars ($50.00). (Ord. 101 § i (part), 1988) 12.12.130 Violation — Penalty. Violation of this chapter is a misdemeanor. (Ord. 101 § 1 (part), 1988) Chapter 12.16 PARKS Sections: ehicles d horses, riding 12.16.010 Hours of operatio . 12.16.020 Animal control. 12.16.030 Littering prohib' ed. 12.16.040 Alcoholic bever ges prohibited. 12.16.050 Excessive noise rohibited. 12.16.060 Public conduc 12.16.070 Duplicating k s prohibited. 12.16.080 Camping and lodging prohibited. 12.16.090 Vending pro ibited. 12.16.100 Fire control. 12.16.110 Damaging property 12.16.120 Fireworks Ond weapons 12.16.130 ehicles d horses, riding a imals nd other conveyances. 12.16.140 R uire ent and enforcement of pa re tai permits. 12.16.150 Re it ment and enforcement of att on permits. 12.16.160 Othe prohibited activities. 12.16.010 Hours peration. No person shall ente o remain in any public park, public open space or pu is r reation grounds during the hours of ten (10:00) p. . to ix (6:00) a.m. without the authorization of the cit manag r or his/her designee. (Ord. 248 § 1 (part), 1998: rd. 81 1 (part), 1986) 12.16.020 An mal contr 1. No person owni g or having harge, care, custody or control of any dog livestock or o er animal shall cause, permit or allow th same to be loo a or run at large upon any public park, ublic open spac or public recreation grounds unless ch animal is restr 'ned by a substantial chain or leash t exceeding six (6) eet in length and is in the charge, are, custody or cont 1 of a competent person. Additi nally, any person ownin or having charge, care, custody or control of any dog, li estock or other animal shall responsible for debris, litte or contaminants caused by su h animal and any neglect of s ch responsibili- ty shall be onstrued as littering, as defi ed in Section 12.16.030 f this chapter. (Ord. 248 § 1 (p t), 1998: Ord. 81 § 1 (p t), 1986) 12.16.0301 Littering prohibited. No person shall drop or deposit refuse, trash, hazardous 233 (Moorpark 12 -95) V V y . -0 G ATTACHMENT C CITY OF MOO"ARK (805) 529 -6864 FAX: 529 -8270 TREE REMOVAL PERMIT City Ordinance: 12.12.070. M.M.C. Date: Time: a.m. p.m. Permit #2 0 6 Name: Address of Tree: Tree Location: O -Front O-Back O -Side Number of Trees for Removal: Property:O- Private O -HOA O- Commercial 0-other Reason for Removal: Section: 12.12.080. A - B Inspected By: Section 12.12.080 Removal Granted: l.A. Tree condition: Diseased or in danger of collapsing in the proximity to an existing Structure. 2.A. Tree interference: with utility service above or under- ground. _3.A. Tree interference: with an addition to a Existing single family detached home NATIVE OAK TREE ONLY _4.B Required removal to construct improvement which allow economic enjoyment of the property Section 12.12.080. Removal Denied: _ i . C. Number of Historic trees, Native Oak and mature trees existing in the neighborhood Below Minimum. 2.1). Number of health mature trees that a given parcel of land will support is Below Minimum. 3. No Condition Exist to Warrant Removal. Tree Replacement Required O -Yes O -No Number of Replacement trees : Permit Expires On: /_ /, Teach HOMEOWNER'S ASSOCIATION, INC. fliIn llallp ATTACHMENT ._ November 21, 2001 Mayor Patrick Hunter City of Moorpark 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark, CA 93021 FROM: Errol Hale, Board President RE: Eucalyptus tree thinning Dear Sirs, Thank you both very much for meeting with Greg Moses, from GM Management, and me on October 19, 2001 to discuss reducing the number of eucalyptus trees in our HOA common area. As we explained at that meeting, our development has an over abundance (131) of these trees. While we do not want to diminish the beauty of our neighborhood by removing all, or too many of these mature trees, we earnestly need to remove some of them. There are forty -nine other trees in our common area, nearly all of which are large, mature trees. These trees that predate our neighborhood and served as windbreaks for the groves that once stood where our homes are now, were left by the developer. There are four reasons we feel it prudent to remove some of these trees. 1) Many are planted dangerously close to homes, posing a safety and property damage issue from falling branches and debris, especially in windy weather. 2) Many are planted too close to each other. 3) As you know, eucalyptus trees are extremely messy, especially in windy weather, unnecessarily raising maintenance costs. 4) They disallow adjacent homeowners to plant in their own yards because the trees block sunlight and constantly drop leaves, pods and bark. Enclosed is a map of our project with all the trees marked. The trees marked in yellow are not a problem. Most of these are not Eucalyptus trees. The trees marked in pink are the trees in question. I have designated different areas in which these trees stand for the sake of explanation. Please see Tree Table. Page 2 of 2 We are not desiring or able to remove these trees all at once. We do tree trimming on about one -third to one — fourth of the trees in the development each year. We desire permission to remove the trees in question as we come to those sections in the next three to four years. As for replacing the downed trees, it would be impractical to replace these trees on a one to one basis. There is simply not enough area in our development to plant this many trees. As we discussed landscaping the parkway along Peach Hill Road, we discussed allowing this landscape improvement including trees, to serve as replacements for the trees we wish to remove. In addition to permission to remove some of our eucalyptus trees, we request that the landscaping along Peach Hill Road be allowed to serve as the replacement for the eucalyptus trees that must be removed. All work will be contracted with licensed contractors who will need to be shown the city's letter of approval of this request. Thank you for your attention to this pressing issue. If you have any questions, I can be reached at (805) 529 -5577 (work) or (805) 523 -7692 (home). Sincerely yours, Errol Hale Board President �� Tree Table Section Description # existing - # to be removed = # to remain A Planted extremely close together, very close to homes and homeowners' fences. 23 -14 =9 Planted close together, very close to homes and homeowners' fences. 12 -6 =6 B C Planted close to homes and homeowner's fences. 4-2 =2 D Most of these are planted very close together, and to homeowners' fences. Homeowners along Quail Summit cannot plant anything in their back yards because they never get sun. 37 -19 =18 E Close together and to homeowners' fences. 12 -6 =6 F Close together and to homeowners' fences. 8 -4 =4 G Close together and to a home and homeowner's fence. 17 -7 =10 H Close together. 18 -6 =12 Total number of existing Eucalyptus trees — the number we wish 131 -64 =67 to remove = the number that will remain. We are requesting permission to remove less than half of these trees. v ♦.o v' v