Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAGENDA REPORT 2002 0501 CC REG ITEM 09BMOORPARK CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT To: Honorable City Council ITEM - t3 CITY OF AlnnRP�RK. rAT,TrORN'TA (;itv Cmmcil '1l�eti��* ACTION': - �rvY�t' Ste' �-� irry�• 717F__�� From: Deborah S. Traffenstedt, Acting Community Development Director rJ Prepared By: Joyce Parker - Bozylinski, Planning Consultant ny J Date: April 25, 2002 (CC meeting of 5/1/02) Subject: Consider General Plan Amendment No. 2001 -01, Zone Change No. 2001 -01, Tentative Tract Map No. 5307, Residential Planned Development No. 2001 -01 and Variance No. 2002 -01, a request for a Change in Land Use Designation from S (Schools) to VH (Very High Density) Residential, Zone Change from R -2 (Two Family Residential) to RPD 9 Dwelling Units /Acre, a 22 -Lot Single - Family Residential Subdivision, and a Variance to Allow an 11.5 -Foot High Sound Wall on Property Located at the Northeast Corner of Flory Avenue and Los Angeles Avenue, on the Application of Colmer Development Company SUMMARY The Planning Commission on March 25, 2002, held a public hearing and adopted Resolution No. PC- 2002 -422 recommending to the City Council approval of Tentative Tract Map No. 5307 for the subdivision of approximately 2.44 acres into twenty -two lots, Residential Planned Development Permit No. 2001 -01 for construction of 22 single family homes, General Plan Amendment No. 2001 -01 to change the land use designation from S (Schools) to VH (Very High Density) Residential and Zone Change No. 2001 -01 to change the Zoning Designation from R- 2 (Two - Family Residential) to RPD -9U (Residential Planned Development 9 dwelling units per acre) and Variance No. 2002 -01 to allow a sound wall up to 11.5 feet in height on a parcel of land (APN 512 -0- 110 -112) located at the northeast corner of Los Angeles Avenue and Flory Avenue. BACKGROUND The proposed project is the southerly 2.44 -acre portion of the existing Flory School site, located at 30 Flory Avenue. The Flory School site consists of a total of approximately 12.02 acres and includes the Flory Elementary School, Moorpark Unified School cc 020501stl1pt 091mer- 4126102 -9:55 AM Cn Honorable City Council Meeting of May 1, 2002 Page 2 District administrative offices and until recently the school bus vehicle maintenance operations and a school bus parking lot. Prior to submitting an application for the project, the applicant met with an Ad Hoc committee consisting of the City Manager, two City Councilmembers (Mayor Hunter and Councilmember Harper), the applicant and Moorpark Unified School District representatives to discuss the issues related to developing the site. These issues; including Los Angeles Avenue street improvements, interior street design, setbacks and landscape parkways are discussed in detail in the Planning Commission staff report (Attachment 1). nrcrrTacTnN Tentative Tract Map No. 5307 would create twenty -two lots ranging in size from 3,275 square feet to 4,478 square feet. The applicant is proposing a small lot subdivision that maintains an interior "Z" lot line on every other lot. In "Z" lot subdivisions, the front portion of a side property line is offset 5 feet from the back portion of the side property line. Each lot grants a 5' wide easement to the adjacent property either in the front or rear of the property. This allows each home to maintain a minimum side yard setback of 5 feet but allows the adjacent property owner to utilize this 5 feet for driveway and yard purposes. Two separate and distinct house plans known as the "two pac" are utilized in this type of small lot subdivision. The applicant is proposing three building footprints shown on the site plan as Plan 1, Plan 2, and Plan 3. The garage for Plan 1 is located 20 feet from the front property line and the garage for Plan 2 is located approximately 44 feet from the front property line. These two house plans make up the "two pac" that works with the "Z" lot line subdivision. Essentially, the useable outdoor space for Plan 1 is located at the rear of the house where as for Plan 2, which is located further back on the lot, the area in front of the garage is utilized as useable outdoor space. The third house plan, Plan 3, will be located on the end lots (Lots 1, 11 and 22) and will be utilized to provide the three required affordable housing units. All the homes are proposed as two -story structures with Mediterranean style architecture. The applicant is proposing to utilize three different architectural styles including Spanish, French County and Tuscany. Utilizing these three styles on two different building plans (Plan 1 and Plan 2) allows six different building elevations. The elevation of Plan 3 consists of the garage elevation and the second story above the garage since it is narrower than the other two plans. The main pedestrian entrance on the Plan 3 home is located on the side of the house and is not visible from the front. In response to staff comments on the proposed Plan 3 elevations (as noted in the Planning Commission report), the \ \MOR_PRI_SERV \City Share \Community Development \Everyone \City Council Agenda Reports \cc 020501stf rpt Colmer.doc c on �� Honorable City Council Meeting of May 1, 2002 Page 3 applicant added additional architectural features to ensure that the affordable units blended into the project. In addition, the Planning Commission recommended that the footprint for Plan 3 on Lots 1 and 22 be reversed so that the front entry is located on the side of the unit that faces Flory Avenue. The Planning Commission further recommended that the homes on Lots 1 and 22 have access directly from Flory Avenue. Staff's interpretation of this recommendation is that the driveways would remain on "A" Street; however, a gate and pedestrian access walkway would be added along Flory Avenue. Although the revised plot plan submitted by the applicant does address the revised orientation of the Plan 3 units, it does not show the gate and pedestrian access walkway to Flory Avenue. The applicant has indicated that the gate and walkway can be accomplished. Condition No. 17.c. was added to the Planning Commission recommended Residential Planned Development Conditions of Approval to address the gate and pedestrian access requirement. Staff's recommendation to the City Council is that Condition No. 17.c. be deleted and the gates and pedestrian access onto Flory Avenue for Lots 1 and 22 not be required to maintain effective noise attenuation and allow parking to be prohibited between Los Angeles Avenue and "A" Street along the east side of Flory Avenue. The project includes a landscaped area ranging in width from 9 feet to 14 feet along Flory Avenue. This landscaping will be installed by the applicant but will be maintained by a Landscape Maintenance District. In addition to the landscaping, the applicant has agreed to provide a monument sign at the corner of Flory and Los Angeles Avenue that would read "Walnut Acres" to identify the name of the historical subdivision for the area. The applicant will be required to dedicate from 13 to 15 feet along the southern property boundary abutting Los Angeles Avenue. The City is currently finalizing plans to make improvements to Los Angeles Avenue. These plans call for a 118 -foot right -of -way, which would include a half street of 51 feet with an 8 -foot wide sidewalk. The proposed condition of approval for the Los Angeles Avenue right -of- way requires the Developer to irrevocably offer to dedicate for street purposes all the property south of the north property line wall to the satisfaction of City and Caltrans for Los Angeles Avenue street improvements to be constructed as a Los Angeles Avenue Area of Contribution (AOC) fee improvement project. Staff will be investigating further whether a dedicated right -turn lane for Flory Avenue and Moorpark Avenue may be accommodated. Staff is recommending a change to Condition of Approval No. 80 for the Tract Map to require a 50 -foot curve radius for the westbound Los Angeles Avenue right turn onto Flory Avenue northeast corner of Los Angeles and Flory Avenues) as follows: \ \MOR_PRI_SERV \City Share \Community Development \Everyone \City Council Agenda Reports \cc 020501stf rpt Colmer.doc �ti �� -W Honorable City Council Meeting of May 1, 2002 Page 4 80. The Developer shall irrevocably offer to dedicate for street purposes all the property south of the north property line wall to the satisfaction of City and Caltrans for Los Angeles Avenue street improvements to be constructed as a Los Angeles Avenue Area of Contribution (AOC) fee improvement project. The amount of property needed for the right -of -way for Los Angeles Avenue and the location of the sidewalk shall be as determined by the City Engineer and the Community Development Director, and shall include sufficient right -of -way to accommodate a 50 -foot curve radius at the northeast corner of _Los Angeles and Flory Avenues. The Developer shall be required to install landscaping south of the property line wall in the area not required for street improvements and sidewalk. Landscaping along Los Angeles Avenue shall be shown on the landscape plan to be approved by the Community Development Director. If approved by the Community Development Director, City Engineer and Caltrans, the sidewalk width may be reduced to six (6) feet if determined necessary to achieve adequate landscape area adjacent to the southerly property line wall. The applicant will be required to provide a landscape planter with tree well cutouts along the Los Angeles Avenue perimeter wall (currently planned to be 5 to 7 feet wide) . Permanent landscaping along Los Angeles Avenue will be maintained as part of a Landscape Maintenance District Access to this project will be provided via Flory Avenue. A new public street (shown as "A" Street) will be created that will be 36 feet wide curb -to -curb with 4 -foot wide sidewalks on both sides of the street. Although this street width does not conform to the standard public street width of 40 feet, staff and the City Council Ad Hoc Committee (Mayor Hunter and Councilmember Harper) are recommending approval of "A" Street as a public street. "A" Street will dead -end into a hammerhead turn around at the eastern edge of the project. Parking will be permitted only on the south side of "A" Street, with "No Stopping at Any Time" signs to be placed on the north side at each end of "A" Street and at intervals not exceeding 175 feet. State Redevelopment law requires that 15% of new residential units constructed within the Redevelopment Area be affordable to low and moderate - income households, and that 40% of those units be affordable to very low- income households. This would require the applicant to provide three affordable units, and staff's recommendation is that one unit be affordable to a very low- income \ \MOR_PRI_SERV \City Share \Community Development \Everyone \City Council Agenda Reports \cc 020501stf rpt Colmer.doc Honorable City Council Meeting of May 1, 2002 Page 5 household and two units be affordable to a low- income household (as reflected in the conditions of approval). The City is currently negotiating with the applicant to build units on the adjacent City owned property on Millard Street. These units would also be affordable to low- income households. If the applicant is ultimately chosen to build the units, the intent is those units would be constructed concurrently with this project. The Planning Commission recommended that the City have the applicant build the units on the City owned parcel. The Commission's opinion was that having the applicant construct the units would ensure that both projects would be consistent in terms of quality and architecture and would also provide for better coordination and less disruption to adjacent residents during the construction phase. As part of the review of this project a noise study was conducted that analyzed the traffic noise from Los Angeles Avenue. The General Plan establishes an interior energy average community noise equivalent level (CNEL) of 45 dBA, which applies to all interior areas except bathrooms, closets and corridors. The exterior noise standard is an energy average CNEL of 65 dBA and applies to all exterior living spaces, which are defined as a single family private yard, a multi - family private patio served by an interior exit and mobile home parks. The noise study completed for this project determined that in order to meet the exterior City noise standards, a sound wall would need to be constructed along Los Angeles Avenue. This sound wall will need to be 9.5 feet high on Lots 1 and 2, 10.5 feet high on Lots 3 through 9 and 11.5 feet high on Lots 10 and 11. In addition, the sound wall will need to extend at least 20 feet to the north on the west side of Lot 1 and on the east side of Lot 11. These extensions would then transition gradually in height down to a standard 6 -foot high wall height. Since the maximum wall height for solid walls allowed per Code is 6 feet in height (eight feet if abutting an industrial zone) , a variance will be required for the sound wall. In order to approve a Variance, the City Council must make certain findings, which are outlined in the City Council Resolution. The Planning Commission was concerned with the height of the wall and concurred with staff that a 2 -to -3 foot high planter wall should be constructed abutting the sidewalk. This would reduce the visual height of the wall to a maximum of 8 feet. The Commission also recommended that the landscaping along the wall include fast growing vines. Providing tree wells along the perimeter of the wall will also help break up the mass of the wall. The northern boundary walls of the proposed project will be constructed approximately 45 feet from the school building currently used to house the Moorpark Police Department. This will essentially block the existing parking spaces located in front of the building. \ \MOR PRI SERV \City Share \Community Development \Everyone \City Council Agenda Reports \cc 020501stf rpt Colmer . doc d-,W N.0 v v� Honorable City Council Meeting of May 1, 2002 Page 6 In order to provide vehicular access around the building the Planning Commission recommended that staff work with the School District to design a one -way driveway with parallel parking spaces provided at the front entryway. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT A Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) was prepared for the project (Attachment 7) . STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS 1. Open the public hearing, accept public testimony, and close the public hearing. 2. Consider the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration to ensure that it adequately addresses the impacts of the proposed residential project prior to approval. 3. Adopt Resolution No. 2002 approving General Plan Amendment No. 2001 -01. 4. Introduce Ordinance No. for first reading approving Zone Change No. 2001 -01. 5. Adopt Resolution No. 2002- approving Tentative Tract Map No. 5307, Residential Planned Development No. 2001 -01, and Variance No. 2002 -01 subject to conditions of approval, and including modification of TTM Condition No. 80 and deletion of RPD Condition No. 17.c. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Planning Commission Staff Report of March 25, 2002 2. Planning Commission Resolution No. PC- 2002 -422, with Recommended Conditions of Approval 3. Project Exhibits A. Tentative Tract Map B. Plot Plan C. Grading Plan D. Drainage Plan E. Floor Plans F. Elevations G. Typical Front Yard Landscape Plan 4. Draft City Council Resolution Approving General Plan Amendment No. 2001 -01 5. Draft Ordinance approving Zone Change No. 2001 -01 6. Draft Resolution Tentative Tract Map No. 5307, Residential Planned Development No. 2001 -01 and Variance No. 2002 -01 7. Mitigated Negative Declaration 8. Traffic Noise Study \ \MOR_PRI_SERV \City Share \Community Development \Everyone \City Council Agenda Reports \cc 020501stf rpt Colmer.doc t City of Moorpark Community Development Department Staff Report PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING DATE: March 25,2002 AGENDA ITEM NO.: 8. B. AGENDA REPORT PREPARED BY: Joyce Parker- Bozylinski, Planner and Deborah S. Traffenstedt, Acting Community Development Director RPD 2001 -01 Residential Planned Development Permit, TTM 5307 Tentative Tract Map, General Plan Amendment GPA 2001 -01 and Zone Change to allow 22 -lot subdivision; and Variance for an 11.5 -foot high sound wall. I ZC 2001 -01 }VAR 2002 -01 APN 512 -0 -11 -112 ICEQA Mitigated Negative Declaration APPLICANT: Colmer Development Company REQUEST: Tentative Tract Map No. 5307 for subdivision of approximately 2.44 acres into twenty -two lots. Residential Planned Development Permit No. 2001 -01 for construction of a 22 single family homes, General Plan Amendment No. 2001 -01 to change the land use designation from S (School) to VHD (Very High Density) and Zone Change No. 2001 -01 to change the zone from R -2 (Two Family Residential) to RPD (Residential Planned Development) 9 dwelling units /acre and a Variance (VAR) to allow a sound wall up to 11.5 feet in height. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT: A Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) was prepared for the project. LOCATION: Located on the northeast corner of Los Angeles Avenue and Flory Avenue, City of Moorpark. . u ROSER7S AVE PROJECT a NORTH c SITE 7 3 EsTHiR AVL J / f SBERMAN AVE LOS ANGELES AVL RECOMMENDATION SUMMARY: Recommend approval conditions. ATTACHMENT / to City Council with Planning Commission Staff Report RPD 2001 -01, TT5307 March 25, 2002 Applicant: Colmer Development Page No. 2 RECOMMENDATION SUMMARY: Recommend approval to City Council with conditions. BACKGROUND The subject application for the subdivision and development of a portion of the Flory School site to construct 22 single - family dwellings was submitted on March 25, 2001. Since submittal of the application, staff has been working with the applicant to resolve incompleteness issues. The Flory School site, located at 30 Flory Avenue, consists of approximately 12.02 acres and includes the Flory Elementary School, Moorpark Unified School District administrative offices and until recently school bus vehicle maintenance operations and a school bus parking lot. These two latter operations have now been moved to an industrial building purchased by the School District on Maureen Lane and the applicant is in escrow with the School District to purchase the property where these operations used to be located (approximately 2.44 acres of the 12.02 acre site). The offices of the Moorpark Food Pantry and Catholic Charities are housed temporarily in the building commonly referred to as the bus barn. when the applicant approached the City about developing the site for residential uses, an Ad hoc committee consisting of the City Manager, two City Council members (Mayor Hunter and Councilmember Harper), the applicant and school district representatives was formed to discuss the issues related to developing the site. These issues, including Los Angeles Avenue street improvements, interior street design, setbacks and landscape parkways, are discussed in further detail in the staff report. In addition, the City Council exempted this site from the requirements of Resolution No. 99 -1578 regarding General Plan Amendment (GPA) Pre - screening procedures; since the site had been in review for some time and assessment by the Affordable Housing /Community Development Committee during a GPA Pre - screening process would be a duplication of effort. ORDINANCES AND POLICIES A Planned Development Permit requires a discretionary decision to authorize development and use on a site. Chapter 17.36.010 establishes standards for residential planned development zones and Chapter 17.32 of the Municipal Code establishes standards for parking, access and landscaping. The application includes a request for a General Plan Amendment and Zone Change to change the existing land use designation and zone S: \Community Development \Everyone \Planning Commission Agenda Reports \020325 RPD 2001 -01 Colmer Rpt rev].doc Ic r "t'% ^ �° V 4 y V Planning Commission Staff Report RPD 2001 -01, TT5307 March 25, 2002 Applicant: Colmer Development Page No. 3 district for the property. Since the City Council is the final decision making body for legislative requests, it is the City's policy to forward all the related permits to the City Council for final action. Therefore, the Planning Commission action on this item will be a recommendation to the City Council. LAND USE DESIGNATION /ZONING /ADJACENT LAND USE Direction General Plan Zoning Land Use Site: Plan land use designation from S (School) North NA NA Los Angeles Avenue South S -R -2 Flory Elementary School East M R -1 Single Family Dwellings West NA NA Flory Avenue Definitions: R -2 (Two Family Dwelling, M (Medium Density 4 DU /Acre) and S (School). DISCUSSION The proposed residential subdivision will occupy the southern 2.44 acres of the existing Flory School site. The subdivision, which will abut Los Angeles Avenue between Flory Avenue and the Ventura County drainage channel, includes a rectangular piece of property approximately 217.48 feet by 489.95 feet. The northern boundary walls will be constructed approximately 45 feet from the school building currently used as a Sheriff Substation. This will essentially block the existing parking spaces located in front of the building. In order to provide vehicular access around the building, the School District will need to restripe the area to provide a driveway in lieu of the existing parking spaces. Access to the subdivision will be provided from Flory Avenue. The proposal includes the creation of a new east /west street shown as "A" Street on the Tract Map. Eleven residential lots will be located on each side of "A" Street, which dead ends into a hammerhead turn around at the eastern School District property line over the drainage channel. The applicant is currently negotiating with the City regarding the development of the City owned parcels located on the northwest corner of Los Angeles Avenue and Millard Street. General Plan Amendment and Zone Change The application includes a request to change the existing General Plan land use designation from S (School) to VHD (Very High Density). Using a gross acreage of 2.446, the requested density is 'r'. 'fl. n S: \Community Development \Everyone\Planning Commission Agenda Reports \02032$ RPD 2001 -01 Colmer Rpt revl.doc C " Planning Commission Staff Report RPD 2001 -01, TT5307 March 25, 2002 Applicant: Colmer Development Page No. 4 approximately 9 dwelling units an acre and using a net acreage (minus "A" Street and other public right -of -way dedications) the requested density would be 12 dwelling units an acre. In addition to a General Plan Amendment, a Zone Change would be required to change the property from R -2 (Two family Residential) to RPD (Residential Planned Development) 9 dwelling units /acre. Tentative Tract Map The Residential Planned Development (RPD) section of the Zoning Code specifies that the RPD permit shall determine the minimum lot size. Tentative Tract Map No. 5307 subdivides approximately 2.44 acres into twenty -two lots ranging in size from 3,275 square feet to 4,478 square feet as follows: Lot 1 4,112 sq. ft. Lot 2 3,305 sq. ft. Lot 3 3,445 sq. ft. Lot 4 3,442 sq. ft. Lot 5 3,458 sq. ft. Lot 6 3,458 sq. ft. Lot 7 3,458 sq. ft. Lot 8 3,477 sq. ft. Lot 9 3,494 sq. ft. Lot 10 3,414 sq. ft. Lot 11 3,275 sq. ft. Lot 12 4,478 sq. ft. Lot 13 3,582 sq. ft. Lot 14 3,511 sq. ft. Lot 15 3,477 sq. ft. Lot 16 3,485 sq. ft. Lot 17 3,458 sq. ft. Lot 18 3,458 sq. ft. Lot 19 3,442 sq. ft. Lot 20 3,445 sq. ft. Lot 21 3,305 sq. ft. Lot 22 4,195 sq. ft. The applicant is proposing a small lot subdivision that maintains an interior "Z" lot line on every other lot. In "Z" lot subdivisions, the front portion of a side property line is off set five feet (51) from the back portion of the side property line. Each lot grants a five -foot (5') wide easement to the adjacent property either in the front or rear of the property. For instance, Lot 2 would grant a five -foot (5') easement along the front side property line to the adjacent Lot 3 and in turn Lot 3 would grant a five -foot (5') easement along their rear side property line. This allows each home to maintain a minimum side yard setback of five feet (5') but allows the adjacent property owner to utilize this feet (5') for driveway and yard purposes. Two separate and distinct house plans are utilized in this type of small lot subdivision. These are often referred to as a "Two Pac" plan as described below. Residential Planned Development The applicant is proposing three building footprints shown on the site plan as Plan 1, Plan 2, and Plan 3. Plan 1 consists S: \Community Development \Everyone\Planning Commission Agenda Reports \020325 RPD 2001 -01 Colmer Rpt revl.doc Planning Commission Staff Report RPD 2001 -01, TT5307 March 25, 2002 Applicant: Colmer Development Page No. 5 square feet with a 400 square foot garage and Plan 2 consists of 1,456 square feet with a 400 square foot garage. The garage for Plan 1 is located 20 feet from the front property line and the garage for Plan 2 is located approximately 44 feet from the front property line. These two house plans make up the "Two Pac" that works with the "Z" lot line subdivision. Essentially the useable outdoor space for Plan 1 is located at the rear of the house where for Plan 2, which is located further back on the lot, the area in front of the garage is utilized as useable outdoor space. This area is typically gated to provide the privacy and security found in rear yard areas. Gates are shown as optional on the landscape plan; however, a condition has been added that would require the applicant to provide vehicular gates on the Plan 2 lots. The third house plan, Plan 3, consists of 1,138 square feet and has a 450 square foot garage (which includes the laundry area). Plan 3 will be located on the end lots (lots 1, 11 and 22) and will be utilized to provide the three required affordable housing units. The living area for Plan 3 is 1,138 square feet and incorporates a combined living and dining area shown as the "great room" and provides only one bathroom on the second story. Setbacks The RPD zone establishes setbacks for market -rate, single - family residential projects and market -rate multifamily projects, but specifies that the Planning Commission or City Council as part of the RPD permit can modify these setback standards. The applicant is requesting approval of setbacks that would be consistent with a small lot subdivision. The proposed setbacks vary slightly based on the configuration of the lot. The following chart specifies the minimum setbacks: While the project does not include rear yard patios, the individual homeowner typically requests these after they purchase the home. Since setbacks are established as part of the RPD permit, it would be desirable to establish setbacks for patio covers and other accessory structures as part of this permit to prevent future problems for the new homeowners. A condition has been added that requires all patio covers and other accessory structures to maintain a 10 -foot rear yard setback and a 5 -foot side yard .C. *-% r. SXommunity Development\Everyone \Planning Commission Agenda Reports \020325 RPD 2001 -01 Colmer Rpt rev Ldoc C v " Plan 1 Plan.2 Plan 3 Front 16 ft. 16 ft. 20 ft. Garage 20 ft. 48.84 ft. 20 ft. Interior Side 5 ft. 5 ft. 5 ft. Street Side NA NA 51 Rear 10' 20 ft. 12 ft. While the project does not include rear yard patios, the individual homeowner typically requests these after they purchase the home. Since setbacks are established as part of the RPD permit, it would be desirable to establish setbacks for patio covers and other accessory structures as part of this permit to prevent future problems for the new homeowners. A condition has been added that requires all patio covers and other accessory structures to maintain a 10 -foot rear yard setback and a 5 -foot side yard .C. *-% r. SXommunity Development\Everyone \Planning Commission Agenda Reports \020325 RPD 2001 -01 Colmer Rpt rev Ldoc C v " Planning Commission Staff Report RPD 2001 -01, TT5307 March 25, 2002 Applicant: Colmer Development Page No. 6 setback. This requirement will provide sufficient area to allow a covered patio on each of the lots either located in the rear of the building or in the case of Lot 11, on the side of the building. Architectural Style All the homes are proposed as two -story structures with Mediterranean style architecture. The applicant is proposing to utilize three different architectural styles including Spanish, French Country and Tuscany. Utilizing these three styles on two different building plans (Plan 1 and Plan 2) allows a total of six different building elevations. The proposed roofs will be either "S" tile or flat tile. The Tuscany plan incorporates stone around the window or window base, wood shutters, wrought iron balcony and stucco corbels. The French Country plan incorporates wood shutters, wooden potshelf at the bottom of some of the windows, decorative metal vents and a metal roof on a bay window. The Spanish plan incorporates stucco corbels, arched windows, decorative tile and a wrought iron element over one of the windows in Plan 2. The rear and side elevations of each unit are relatively unadorned. A condition has been added that would require the applicant to provide additional window treatment around all second story rear windows as these windows would be visible from either Los Angeles Avenue or the adjacent public school. The condition also includes a requirement to provide the additional window treatment on the second story side windows for the two homes that abut Flory Avenue (Lots 1 and 22) because the second story will be visible from both Los Angeles Avenue and Flory Avenue. Additional window treatment on the second story windows on the east side of the home proposed on Lot 11, which will be visible from Los Angeles Avenue, is also required. The predominant front elevation of Plan 3 consists of the garage elevation and the second story above the garage since it is narrower than the other two building plans. The main pedestrian entrance on the Plan 3 home is located on the side of the house and is not visible from the street. While this configuration presents some design challenges, staff believes that incorporating some of the architectural elements provided in the other two plans could enhance the front elevation significantly. As currently proposed, the Plan 3 units would not blend in with the other homes. Staff believes these units should for the most part appear similar in architectural style to the other homes. A condition has been added that would require the applicant to redesign the Plan 3 homes by �f-.' 4� S: \Community Development\Everyone \Planning Commission Agenda Reports \020325 RPD 2001 -01 Colmer Rpt revl.doc " Planning Commission Staff Report RPD 2001 -01, TT5307 March 25, 2002 Applicant: Colmer Development Page No. 7 incorporating some of the architectural elements found in the other plans. Landscaping, Signage and Walls The applicant will provide landscaping for the front yards of each of the homes as shown on the landscape plan. The submitted landscape plan includes deciduous front yard trees such as Alder, Poplar or Sycamore to be provided for each lot in addition to a turf area with flowering shrubs and perennials. Final plant selection will be reviewed by the City's landscape architect and approved by the Community Development Director. Each individual homeowner will maintain this landscaping, as no Home Owners Association will be formed. Any landscaping or hardscape (patio slab) in the rear yard will be the responsibility of the individual property owner. Although decorative driveway paving is conceptually shown on the floor plans, it is not the applicant's intent to include this type of paving in the construction of the project. The project includes a landscape setback area ranging in width from 9 feet to 14 feet along Flory Avenue. This landscaping will be installed by the applicant but will be maintained by a Landscape Maintenance District. In addition to the landscaping, the applicant has agreed to provide a monument sign at the corner of Flory and Los Angeles Avenue that would read "Walnut Acres," which is the name of the original subdivision and development. There will also be a monument sign for Walnut Acres placed on the northwest corner of Millard Street and Los Angeles Avenue when the City develops those lots. The applicant will also be required to provide a 5 to 7 foot wide landscape planter with tree well cutouts along the Los Angeles Avenue perimeter wall. Permanent landscaping will.be maintained as part of a Landscape Maintenance District. Six -foot high slumpstone masonry walls are proposed for the rear and side property lines with wrought iron gates at the side property line. The rear perimeter wall along Los Angeles Avenue will consist of decorative design with pilasters, and will range in height from 9.5 feet to 11.5 feet as discussed in the Variance section of this staff report. The Community Development Director will approve the final wall design for all project walls. The site currently contains twenty -nine (29) mature trees. The City requires a valuation study be completed on all mature trees located on a development project site. The Tree Valuation Report completed for this project indicates that the site contains 19 mature Pine S:\CommunityDevelopment\Everyone\Planning Commission Agenda Reports \020325 RPD 2001 -01 Colmer Rpt rev Ldoc C. /'I rX v v .. .... Planning Commission Staff Report RPD 2001 -01, TT5307 March 25, 2002 Applicant: Colmer Development Page No. 8 trees and 10 mature Eucalyptus trees. Since these trees have not be properly maintained over the years and appear to have been stunted in growth due to the severe pruning to maintain clearance from the utility line, the report indicates that none of the trees are of significant value and worthy of preservation. The total valuation for all trees on the site is $26,900. The project has been conditioned to provide enhanced landscaping that totals the amount of the estimated tree impact pursuant to Municipal Code requirements. The Ad hoc Committee has recommended this be approved to assist with the affordable units to be constructed. Affordable Housing Requirements State redevelopment law requires that 15% of the proposed units be affordable to low and moderate - income families since this site is within the City's redevelopment project area. This would require the applicant to provide 3 affordable units. The applicant will be required to sell the units to the City who will then sell the homes with resale restrictions to ensure that they remain affordable in perpetuity. Two (2) of the units will be made available at affordable housing costs (30% of 70% of median income) to low income households, and one (1) unit will be made available at affordable housing cost (30% of 50% of median income) for very low income households. City is currently negotiating with the applicant to build units on the City owned property on Millard Street. These units would also be affordable to low and moderate - income families. While no agreement with had been worked out prior to the preparation of this staff report, the goal would be to make a determination on the disposition of the City owned property in the near future. If the applicant is ultimately chosen to build the units, they would be constructed concurrently with this project. Traffic and Circulation Access to this project will be provided via Flory Avenue. A new public street (shown as "A" Street) will be created that will be 36 feet wide curb to curb with 4 foot wide sidewalks (including top of curb) on both sides of the street. While this street width does not conform to the standard public street width of 40 feet, the City has agreed to accept the street as a public street. Staff recommends that the new public street built to serve this project dead -end into a hammerhead turn around at the eastern edge of the project, with no through street or pedestrian access to Millard Street. For traffic traveling on Los Angeles Avenue, taking a through access from Millard Street to Flory Avenue and the school s� ON S: \Community Development\Everyone \Planning Commission Agenda Reports \020325 RPD 2001 -01 Colmer Rpt revl.doc C �, �- -�� Planning Commission Staff Report RPD 2001 -01, TT5307 March 25, 2002 Applicant: Colmer Development Page No. 9 would not be much shorter than staying on Los Angeles Avenue. There is also a concern that through traffic at this location would create traffic and security problems for the development. Additionally, the intersection that would be created at Millard is too close to Los Angeles Avenue. However, there is no choice regarding the location for the intersection of "A" Street at Flory Avenue, since it provides access to the site. The recommended turn around allows the Moorpark Redevelopment Agency to achieve three (3) new affordable units on the adjacent site rather than the two (2) units that could be achieved with a through street configuration. The proposed "cul de sac" condition will work for the ultimate twenty -five (25) units that could be developed with the three (3) Redevelopment Agency units. The Ad hoc Committee reviewed several street alternatives for this site, including various widths for through travel to Millard Street. The Committee however supports staff recommendation for a permanent turn - around at the end of "A ". The applicant will be required to dedicate from 13 to 15 feet along the southern property boundary abutting Los Angeles Avenue. This will allow for an 8 -foot wide sidewalk and 5 to 7 foot wide landscape planter. The City is currently finalizing plans to make improvements to Los Angeles Avenue. These plans call for a 118 - foot right -of -way, which would include a half street of 51 feet with an 8 -foot wide sidewalk. The City will be responsible for the improvements to Los Angeles Avenue to be funded by the Los Angeles Avenue Area of Contribution fund. The applicant will be responsible for the installation of the landscaping in the 5 to 7 foot wide landscape planter. As noted earlier, the landscaping adjacent to the sidewalk would be maintained by a landscape maintenance district. Variance As part of the review of this project, a noise study was conducted that analyzed the traffic noise from Los Angeles Avenue on this project. The City has established interior and exterior noise criteria in order to protect the heath and welfare of the residents of the City. The interior noise limit established is an energy average community noise equivalent level (CNEL) of 45 dBA and applies to all interior areas except bathrooms, closets and corridors. The exterior noise standard is an energy average CNEL of 65 dBA and applies to all exterior living spaces, which are defined as a single family private yard, a multi - family private patio served by an interior exit and mobile home parks. The noise study completed for this project determined that in order to meet S: \Community Development \Everyone \Planning Commission Agenda Reports \020325 RPD 2001 -01 Colmer Rpt revl.doc C v .... _,i Planning Commission Staff Report RPD 2001 -01, TT5307 March 25, 2002 Applicant: Colmer Development Page No. 10 the exterior City noise standards, a sound constructed along Los Angeles Avenue. This be 9.5 feet high on Lots 1 and 2, 10.5 feet 9 and 11.5 feet high on Lots 10 and 11. In will need to extend at least 20 feet to the of Lot 1 and on the east side of Lot 11. then transition gradually in height down to wall height. wall would need to be sound wall will need to high on Lots 3 through addition the sound wall north on the west side These extensions would a standard 6 -foot high In order to visually reduce the height of the perimeter sound wall, staff is recommending that a 2 to 3 foot high retaining wall be installed at the back of the proposed Los Angeles Avenue sidewalk. This would create a raised planter between the sidewalk and the perimeter wall. Adding a planter in front of the perimeter wall will help reduce the visual height of the wall and still allow sufficient room for small trees, shrubs and vines to further screen the wall. Since the City will be responsible for the completion of the Los Angeles Avenue improvements, this planter wall could be installed by the City. Since the maximum wall height allowed per Code for solid walls is 6 feet in height (eight feet if abutting industrial zone), a variance would be required for the sound wall. In order to approve a Variance, the Planning Commission must make certain legal findings. These findings and the project's compliance with these findings are noted below: 1. That there are special circumstances applicable to the subject property, with regard to size, shape, topography, location or surroundings, such that the strict application of the zoning regulations deprives such property of privileges enjoyed by other property in the vicinity and under identical zoning classification. The project is located adjacent to Los Angeles Avenue, which is a six -lane major arterial. The annual average two -way traffic in 2001 was 34,000 vehicles. This number is expected to increase to 38,900 vehicles by 2020. In addition 19.4% of all the vehicles consist of medium to heavy trucks using the route as an alternative to H -101. In order for the project to comply with the City's adopted exterior noise standard of 65 dBA, a sound wall must be constructed along Los Angeles Avenue ranging in height from 9.5 to 11.5 feet above the centerline of Los Angeles Avenue. 2. That the granting of the Variance will not confer a special privilege inconsistent with the limitations upon other properties in the same vicinity and zone. Other existing residential properties located along Los Angeles Avenue SXommunity Development \Everyone\Planning Commission Agenda Reports \020325 RPD 2001 -01 Colmer Rpt revl.doc " � n n Planning Commission Staff Report RPD 2001 -01, TT5307 March 25, 2002 Applicant: Colmer Development Page No. 11 utilize tall sound walls to mitigate the noise from Los Angeles Avenue. In addition since this is an infill project on an existing school site, it was not possible to provide a large setback from the edge of Los Angeles Avenue. 3. That the strict application of the zoning regulations as they apply to the subject property would result in practical difficulties or unnecessary hardships inconsistent with the general purpose of such regulations in that the residents of the proposed homes would not be able to enjoy the use of their back yards due to the traffic noise from Los Angeles Avenue. 4. That the granting of the Variance will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, nor to the use, enjoyment or valuation of neighboring properties as the sound wall will be properly engineered and constructed. The overall visual height of the wall will be reduced by the provision of a 2 to 3 foot high planter located in front of the wall. The landscape planter will be landscaped with small trees, shrubs and vines (as allowed by the footing locations) to further screen the wall. AGENCY REVIEW All requested conditions of approval from Agencies and Departments that have reviewed the Residential Planned Development and Tract Map have been incorporated into the Conditions of Approval for this project. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION Based upon the findings contained in the initial study, it was determined that the project would not have a significant effect upon the environment and in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act, the City provided public notice of the intent to adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration for this project. Mitigation measures were added to the project relative to the noise impacts from the traffic on Los Angeles Avenue. These mitigation measures include requirements for double pane windows, increased window thickness and gasketing of doors and the installation of a sound wall along Los Angeles Avenue. The mitigation measures are outlined in the attached MND and will be made a part of the conditions of approval. A%, ON 4M SXommum ' Develo mentTve r5onePlannin Commission Agenda Re Po its \020325 RPD 2001 -01 Colmer R t reNTdoc C. .. — . —..� Planning Commission Staff Report RPD 2001 -01, TT5307 March 25, 2002 Applicant: Colmer Development Page No. 12 STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS 1. Open the public hearing, accept public testimony, and close the public hearing. 2. Consider the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration to ensure that it adequately addresses the impacts of the proposed residential project prior to making a recommendation. 3. Adopt Resolution No. PC -2002- recommending to the City Council approval of General Plan Amendment No. 2001 -01, Zone Change No. 2001 -01, Residential Planned Development No. 2001- 01, Tentative Tract Map No. 5307, and Variance No. 2002 -01, subject to conditions of approval. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Project Exhibits A. Tentative Tract Map B. Plot Plan C. Grading Plan D. Drainage Plan E. Floor Plans F. Elevations G. Typical Front Yard Landscape Plan 2. Mitigated Negative Declaration 3. Noise Study 4. Draft Resolutions with Conditions of Approval 5. Letter Regarding Environmental Review Process from Department of Transportation dated March 11, 2002 S: \Community Development \Everyone \Planning Commission Agenda Reports \020325 RPD 2001 -01 Colmer Rpt rev doc n ^. n + S C V" V V RESOLUTION NO. PC- 2002 -422 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL OF GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 2001 -01, ZONE CHANGE NO. 2001 -01, TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 5307, RESIDENTIAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 2001 -01 AND VARIANCE NO. 2002 -01 FOR AN APPROXIMATELY 2.44 ACRES SITE LOCATED ON THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF LOS ANGELES AVENUE AND FLORY STREET, ON THE APPLICATION OF COLMER DEVELOPMENT COMPANY ASSESSOR PARCEL NO. 512 -0 -11 -112 WHEREAS, at a duly noticed Public Hearing on March 25, 2002, the Planning Commission considered General Plan Amendment No. 2001 -01, Zone Change No. 2001 -01, Tentative Tract Map No. 5307, Residential Planned Development Permit No. 2001 -01 and Variance No. 2002 -01 on the application of Colmer Development Company for an approximately 2.44 acre site located on the northeast corner of Los Angeles Avenue and Flory Street (Assessor Parcel No. 512 -0 -11 -112); and WHEREAS, the proposed project is more specifically described as follows: General Plan Amendment No. 2001 -01: A request for a change in the Land Use Designation of the Land Use Element of the General Plan from S (School) to VHD (Very High Density); Zone Change No. 2001 -01: A request for a change in the Zoning from R -2 (Two Family Residential) to RPD (Residential Planned Development) 9 dwelling units /acre; Tentative Tract Map No 5307 and Residential Planned Development Permit No. 2001 -01: A request for subdivision of approximately 2.44 acres into twenty -two (22) single family residential lots and the construction of 22 single family units; Variance No. 2002 -01: A request to allow a sound wall up to 11.5 feet in height; and WHEREAS, at its meeting of March 25, 2002, the Planning Commission conducted public hearings and received public S: \Community Development \Everyone \PC FINAL RESO \pc 422 reso gpa zc rpd ttm var colmer.doc Modified: 04/24/02.x; ATTACHMENT 2- RESOLUTION NO. PC- 2002 -422 GPA 2001 -01, ZC 2001 -01, TT 5307, RPD No. 2001 -01, VAR 2002 -01 Page 2 testimony, and after receiving public testimony, the Planning Commission closed the public hearing. NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. The Planning Commission does hereby find that General Plan Amendment No. 2001 -01, Zone Change 2001 -01, Tentative Tract Map No. 5307 and Residential Planned Development Permit No. 2001 -01 are consistent with the City's General Plan, subject to amendment of the land use designation as proposed. SECTION 2. The Planning Commission further finds that General Plan Amendment No. 2001 -01, Zone Change 2001 -01, Tentative Tract 5307 and Residential Planned Development Permit No. 01 -01 are consistent with the Mitigated Negative Declaration prepared for the project. SECTION 3. That the Planning Commission adopts the following additional findings: C.E.Q.A. Findinqs 1. That the Mitigated Negative Declaration prepared for General Plan Amendment No. 2001 -01, Zone Change 2001 -01, Tentative Tract 5307 and Residential Planned Development Permit No. 01 -01 and Variance 2002 -01 serves as the environmental document for the General Plan Amendment, Zone Change, Tentative Tract Map, Residential Planned Development Permit and Variance. 2. In order to reduce the potential adverse impacts of this project, mitigation measures discussed in the Mitigated Negative Declaration have been incorporated and shall apply to General Plan Amendment No. 2001 -01, Zone Change 2001 -01, Tentative Tract Map No. 5307, Residential Planned Development Permit No. 01 -01 and Variance 02 -01. 3. A Mitigation Reporting and Monitoring Program prepared in compliance with Assembly Bill 3180 and considered in the S: \Community Development \Everyone \PC FINAL RESO \pc 422 reso gpa zc rpd ttm var colmer.doc Modified: 04/24/02 RESOLUTION NO. PC- 2002 -422 GPA 2001 -01, ZC 2001 -01, TT 5307, RPD No. 2001 -01, VAR 2002 -01 Page 3 various decisions regarding these projects applies to General Plan Amendment No. 2001 -01, Zone Change 2001 -01, Tentative Tract Map No. 5307, Residential Planned Development Permit No. 01 -01 and Variance No. 02 -01 Subdivision Map Act Findings: Based on the information set forth above, it has been determined that Tentative Tract Map No. 5307, with imposition of the attached conditions, meets the requirements of California Government Code Sections 66473.5, 66474, 66474.6, and 66478.1 et seq., in that: 1. The proposed map is consistent with the City of Moorpark General Plan and Zoning Ordinance. 2. That the design and improvements of the proposed subdivision is consistent with the City of Moorpark General Plan. 3. The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed. 4. The site is physically suitable for the proposed density of development. 5. The design of the subdivision and the proposed improvements are not likely to cause substantial environmental damage. 6. The design of the subdivision and the type of improvements are not likely to cause serious public health problems. 7. The design of the subdivision and the type of improvements will not conflict with easements acquired by the public at large, for access through, or use of the property within the proposed subdivision. 8. There will be no discharge of waste from the proposed subdivision into an existing community sewer system in violation of existing water quality control requirements under Water Code Section 13000 et seq. S: \Community Development \Everyone \PC FINAL RESO \pc 422 reso gpa zc rpd ttm var colmer.doc Modified: 04/24/02 0"' {` ^1 f° V" V V i9 RESOLUTION NO. PC- 2002 -422 GPA 2001 -01, ZC 2001 -01, TT 5307, RPD No. 2001 -01, VAR 2002 -01 Page 4 9. The proposed subdivision does not contain or front upon any public waterway, river, stream, coastline, shoreline, lake, or reservoir. Residential Planned Development Permit Findings: 1. The proposed project is consistent with the intent and provisions of the City's General Plan and Zoning Ordinance. 2. The proposed project is compatible with the character of surrounding development. 3. The proposed project would not be obnoxious or harmful, or impair the utility of neighboring property or uses. 4. The proposed project would not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience, or welfare. 5. The proposed project is compatible with existing and planned land uses in the general area where the development is to be located. 6. The proposed project is compatible with the scale, visual character and design of the surrounding properties, designed so as to enhance the physical and visual quality of the community, and the structure(s) have design features which provide visual relief and separation between land uses of conflicting character. 7. The residential structure setbacks are appropriate for an infill residential project that includes affordable housing. Variance Findings: 1. That there are special circumstances applicable to the subject property, with regard to size, shape, topography, location or surroundings, such that the strict application of the zoning regulations deprives such property of privileges enjoyed by other property in the vicinity and under identical zoning classification. The project is located adjacent to Los Angeles Avenue, which is a four - lane divided major arterial. The annual average two -way traffic in 2001 was 34,000 vehicles. This number is S: \Community Development \Everyone \PC FINAL RESO \pc 422 reso gpa zc rpd ttm var colmer.doc Modified: 04/24/02 RESOLUTION NO. PC- 2002 -422 GPA 2001 -01, ZC 2001 -01, TT 5307, RPD No. 2001 -01, VAR 2002 -01 Page 5 expected to increase to 38,900 vehicles by 2020. In addition 19.4% of all the vehicles consist of medium to heavy trucks using the route as an alternative to H -101. In order for the project to comply with the City's adopted exterior noise standard of 65 dBA, a sound wall must be constructed along Los Angeles Avenue ranging in height from 9.5 to 11.5 feet above the centerline of Los Angeles Avenue. 2. That the granting of the Variance will not confer a special privilege inconsistent with the limitations upon other properties in the same vicinity and zone. Other existing residential properties located along Los Angeles Avenue utilize tall sound walls to mitigate the noise from Los Angeles Avenue. In addition since this is an infill project on an existing school site, it was not possible to provide a large setback from the edge of Los Angeles Avenue. 3. That the strict application of the zoning regulations as they apply to the subject property would result in practical difficulties or unnecessary hardships inconsistent with the general purpose of such regulations in that the residents of the proposed homes would not be able to enjoy the use of their back yards due to the traffic noise from Los Angeles Avenue. 4. That the granting of the Variance will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, nor to the use, enjoyment or valuation of neighboring properties as the sound wall will be properly engineered and constructed. The overall visual height of the wall will be reduced by the provision of a 2 to 3 foot high planter located in front of the wall. The landscape planter will be landscaped with shrubs and vines to further screen the wall. SECTION 4. That the Planning Commission recommends to the City Council approval of General Plan Amendment No. 2001 -01, Zone Change 2001 -01, Tentative Tract Map No. 5307, Residential Planned Development Permit No. 01 -01 and Variance No. 02 -01 subject to the Conditions of Approval (Exhibit A). S: \Community Development \Everyone \PC FINAL RESO \pc 422 reso gpa zc rpd ttm var colmer.doc Modified: 04/24/02 4'0 /'' F'-, • -q C V V L -J, RESOLUTION NO. PC- 2002 -422 GPA 2001 -01, ZC 2001 -01, TT 5307, RPD No. 2001 -01, VAR 2002 -01 Page 6 SECTION 5. That the Planning Commission recommends that the City Council direct staff that the Police Facility adjacent to the subject property be further studied to insure that adequate access, parking and circulation are maintained. The action of the foregoing direction was approved by the following vote: AYES: Commissioner Haller, Vice Chair Landis, Commissioner DiCecco, Commissioner Parvin and Chair Otto NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: PASSED AND ADOPTED THIS 25TH DAY OF MARCH 2002. William F. Otto, Chair ATTEST: Deborah S. Traffenstedt Acting Community Development Director EXHIBITS: A. General Plan Exhibit Map B. Zone Change Exhibit Map C. Conditions of Approval for Tract Map No. 5307, D. Conditions of Approval for Residential Planned Development Permit No. 01 -01 and Variance No. 02 -01. S: \Community Development \Everyone \PC FINAL RESO \pc 422 reso gpa zc rpd ttm var colmer.doc Modified: 04/24/02 GENERAL PLAN EXHIBIT MAP i \` - W CHAP AR:�.1. �_� `► M►G�:'sr � < t ` � l>KEa1 �- Al ANc,ElE'S Cl tT S 'A CIO so � S t -3+m SnA) 310 2—&AAD SXA' FI/b FIt-A9Y C o oc RVYM A 4E. ?tli� 5T- niFU i 1 wumm ( suswa M& ui �---- RO6ERTS I ESTHEP _ <I � , SHEF3�l +.ti A E� HWY. 113: _ AVE. WJ A k' AVE S to VH NAJESs1G j � ,1 A , 1F z L. i� J ' % �' ' E►P. {:SALE 11t <-. aurrERSaD LM- A NORTH EXHIBIT A CC ZONING EXHIBIT MAP 'ER` cT IT N RUN 1►: JE. � f t .. a Mir LL, i FUG (A AVE.) C`� S (HWY. 11 S) S R -2 to RPD 9 du /ac 10-6 A NORTH A VF-. CL i - *E:STC.'TE Pl% _: FP.VCM +ALE llt� � LAN rMl LN • EXHIBIT B c .... APt1tNDE(} FR = 1 -3RD SnA) 3f0 Susya aVE. 1 iT 2 -QAM ST(w3 R(j8gi_TS Y Njo t � ,1 T-Ite FLCRY z L�5 SHERH.� 1 ,�NGELE� (HWY. 11 S) S R -2 to RPD 9 du /ac 10-6 A NORTH A VF-. CL i - *E:STC.'TE Pl% _: FP.VCM +ALE llt� � LAN rMl LN • EXHIBIT B c .... RESOLUTION NO. PC- 2002 -422 GPA 2001 -01, TTM No. 5307, RPD No. 2001 -01, VAR 2002 -01 Page 9 EXHIBIT C CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 5307 A. DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT: 1. Application of City Ordinances /Policies: The conditions of approval of this Tentative Tract Map and all provisions of _ the Subdivision Map Act, City of Moorpark Ordinance and adopted City policies at the time of tentative map approval supersede all conflicting notations, specifications, dimensions, typical sections and the like which may be shown on said map. 2. Acceptance of Conditions: Recordation of this subdivision shall be deemed to be acceptance by the subdivider and his /her heirs, assigns, and successors of the conditions of this Map. A notation which references conditions of approval shall be included on the Final Map in a format acceptable to the Community Development Director. 3. Expiration of Map: This Tentative Tract Map shall expire three (3) years from the date of its approval. The Community Development Director may, at his /her discretion, grant up to two (2) additional one (1) year extensions for map recordation, if there have been no changes in the adjacent areas and if applicant can document that he /she has diligently worked towards map recordation during the initial period of time. The request for extension of this entitlement shall be made in writing, at least 30 -days prior to-the expiration date of the permit. 4. Hold Harmless: The subdivider shall defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City and its agents, officers and employees from any claim, action or proceeding against the City or its agents, officers or employees to attack, set aside, void, or annul any approval by the City or any of its agencies, departments, commissions, agents, officers, or employees concerning the subdivision, which claim, action or proceeding is brought within the time period provided therefore in Government Code Section 66499.37. The City will promptly notify the subdivider of any such claim, action or proceeding, and, if the City should fail to do so or should fail to cooperate fully in the defense, the S: \Community Development \Everyone \Resolutions and Conditions \PC 422 conds gpa zc rpd ttm var Colmer rev2.doc Modified: 04/25/02 RESOLUTION NO. PC- 2002 -422 GPA 2001 -01, TTM No. 5307, RPD No. 2001 -01, VAR 2002 -01 Page 10 subdivider shall not thereafter be responsible to defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City or its agents, officers and employees pursuant to this condition. a. The City may, within its unlimited discretion, participate in the defense of any such claim, action or proceeding if both of the following occur: i. The City bears its own attorney fees and costs; ii. The City defends the claim, action or proceeding in good faith. b. The subdivider shall not be required to pay or perform any settlement of such claim, action or proceeding unless the settlement is approved by the subdivider. The subdivider's obligations under this condition shall apply regardless of whether a Final Map is ultimately recorded with respect to the subdivision. 5. Effect of Conditions: No conditions of this entitlement shall be interpreted as permitting or requiring any violation of law or any unlawful rules or regulations or orders of an authorized governmental agency. The approved Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program is included as an attachment to the approving resolution, and all mitigation measures are requirements of the Vesting Tentative Tract Map and Residential Planned Development Permit, as applicable. 6. Severability: If any of the conditions or limitations of this approval are held to be invalid, that holding shall not invalidate any of the remaining conditions or limitations set forth. 7. Duplication of Conditions: All mitigation measures contained within the approved Mitigation Monitoring Report and Program (MMRP) are hereby adopted as requirements of the Tentative Map, as applicable. Where conflict or duplication between the MMRP and the conditions of approval occurs and applicability for compliance is questioned by the Developer, the Community Development Director will determine the applicable condition compliance requirements for each phase of development. B. Title Report: Prior to Approval of the Final Map, the subdivider shall submit to the Department of Community S: \Community Development \Everyone \Resolutions and Conditions \PC 422 conds gpa zc rpd ttm var Colmer rev2.doc Modified: 04/25/02 " RESOLUTION NO. PC- 2002 -422 GPA 2001 -01, TTM No. 5307, RPD No. 2001 -01, VAR 2002 -01 Page 11 Development and the City Engineer for review a current title report which clearly states all interested parties and lenders included within the limits of the subdivision as well as any easements that affect the subdivision. 9. Image Conversion of Plans: Prior to approval of the Final Map, the builder shall pay to the City a fee for the image conversion of the final map and improvement plans, as determined by the Community Development Director, into an electronic imaging format acceptable to the City Clerk. - 10. Consistent with the City's General Plan Housing Element, State law and Moorpark redevelopment Agency Implementation Plan, the Tentative Tract Map is subject to execution of an Affordable Housing Agreement between the City of Moorpark and the Applicant or Developer. The Affordable Housing Agreement shall set forth the procedure for meeting an affordable housing requirement of fifteen percent (15 %) of the total number of approved dwelling units. The Agreement may be part of a Development Agreement. Execution of the Affordable Housing Agreement is required prior to first final map approval. 11. Outstanding Case Processing Costs: The Applicant shall pay all outstanding case processing (Planning and Engineering), and all applicable City legal service fees within sixty (60) days of approval of this Vesting Tentative Tract Map. The Applicant, permittee, or successors in interest shall also submit to the Department of Community Development a fee to cover costs incurred by the City for Condition Compliance review of the Tentative Map. 12. Submittal of Landscape Plans: Prior to issuance of a Zoning Clearance for grading, Applicant shall submit a complete Landscape Plan, together with specifications and a separate Maintenance Plan. The Landscape Plan shall encompass all areas required to be planted consistent with these conditions of approval. The Landscape Plan shall be reviewed by the City's Landscape Architect Consultant and approved by the Community Development Director prior to Zoning Clearance for grading permit, or first Final Map approval, whichever occurs first. All of the following Landscape Plan and inspection requirements shall be complied with: S: \Community Development \Everyone \Resolutions and Conditions \PC 422 conds gpa zc rpd ttm var Colmer rev2.doc Modified: 04/25/02 C RESOLUTION NO. PC- 2002 -422 GPA 2001 -01, TTM No. 5307, RPD No. 2001 -01, VAR 2002 -01 Page 12 a. Prior to initial review of the landscape plans, the Applicant shall deposit funds for plan review in an amount specified by the Community Development Director. The Applicant shall deposit additional funds upon request as needed to cover all landscape plan check and inspection fees. Any deposit balance remaining following final approval of the installation shall be refunded to the Applicant. b. All plant material shall conform to the current issue of the American Standard for Nursery Stock published by the American Association of Nurserymen. C. Prior to final inspection by the City of Moorpark, the Applicant's landscape architect shall provide written certification to the City, stating that the installation is in substantial conformance with the approved landscape plans. d. Prior to final inspection by the City of Moorpark, the Applicant shall provide a written certification for the operation of the backflow device. e. All backflow preventers, transformers, and other above -grade utilities shall be appropriately screened with walls and /or plantings. f. The planting and irrigation design shall comply with the State of California Model Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance. g. Prior to occupancy, the landscape installation shall be approved by the Community Development Director. This approval shall be based upon written certification of the landscape installation by the City Landscape Consultant. h. The landscape plan shall include planting and irrigation specifications for front yard landscaping for all residences. Front yard landscaping shall be installed as determined by the Residential Planned Development Permit for all lots in this project as reviewed and approved by the Community Development Director prior to final inspection and release of utilities. S: \Community Development \Everyone \Resolutions and Conditions \PC 422 conds gpa zc rpd ttm var Colmer rev2.doc Modified: 04/25/02 RESOLUTION NO. PC- 2002 -422 GPA 2001 -01, TTM No. 5307, RPD No. 2001 -01, VAR 2002 -01 Page 13 i. The landscape plans shall be revised to eliminate poplar trees as a front yard tree. j. The developer shall utilize a fast growing vine species along the outside of the perimeter wall along Los Angeles Avenue. 13. Ultra -low water consumption plumbing fixtures shall be installed consistent with City Ordinance No. 132. The project shall also include a requirement for the following _ energy saving devices or construction features: a. Stoves, ovens, and ranges, when gas fueled shall not have continuous burning pilot lights. b. All thermostats connected to the main space- heating source shall have night setback features. C. Kitchen ventilation system shall have automatic dampers to ensure closure when not in use. 14. Fence /Wall Plan: A fencing, perimeter, gate, and privacy barrier wall plan, complete with related landscaping details, identifying the materials to be used and proposed wall heights and locations shall be submitted to and approved by the Community Development Director prior to the issuance of a Zoning Clearance for grading. All fences /walls along lot boundaries shall be in place prior to occupancy of each lot, unless timing for installation is otherwise stated in these conditions. Where applicable prior to approval of the final fence /wall plan, the Community Development Director shall approve the connection of property line wall with existing fences and or walls on adjacent residential properties. The Developer is required at his /her sole expense to connect or reconstruct adjacent residential walls and or fences to the project perimeter wall utilizing the same type of material that comprises existing walls and or fences that are to be connected to the project perimeter wall. 15. Sight Distance on Fence /Wall and Landscaping Plans: The Developer shall submit fence /wall and landscaping plans showing that provisions have been taken to provide for and maintain proper sight distances. All fences, walls and other structures shall be submitted to and approved by the Community Development Director. S: \Community Development \Everyone \Resolutions and Conditions \PC 422 conds gpa zc rpd ttm var Colmer rev2.doc Modified: 04/25/02 t� ii RESOLUTION NO. PC- 2002 -422 GPA 2001 -01, TTM No. 5307, RPD No. 2001 -01, VAR 2002 -01 Page 14 16. Final Design: The final design and location of all walls and fences, streetscape elements, urban landscaping are subject to the approval of the Community Development Director. 17. Prior to Final Map approval, the Applicant shall provide an irrevocable offer to dedicate to the City any easements required for the City to access and maintain any landscaped areas or drainage improvements outside of the public right - of -way, which have been designated -to be maintained by the City. In addition, prior to Final Map approval for any phase, the Applicant shall also provide to the City a signed Petition /Waiver a) requesting formation of an Assessment District to fund future costs for the maintenance of any landscaping and /or drainage facilities designated to be maintained by the City, and b) waiving all rights conferred by Proposition 218 with regard to the right to protest any such assessments. Said Petition and Waiver shall include, as an Exhibit, an Engineer's Report fully setting forth a description of the assessment district and the assessments, consistent with the requirements of the California Streets and Highways Code. Said report shall be prepared by a consultant to be retained by the City. The Applicant shall pay to the City a $5,000 advance to fund the cost of the Engineer's Report. In the event it is determined that there will be no landscaping or extraordinary drainage improvements to be maintained by the City, the Community Development Director may waive this condition with the concurrence of the City Manager. 18. Prior to Final Map approval, the City Council shall determine which areas shall be maintained by a maintenance assessment district. 19. Fish and Game Fee Requirement: Within two (2) days after the City Council adoption of a resolution approving this project, the Applicant shall submit to the City of Moorpark a check for a single fee of $1,250.00 plus a $25.00 filing fee payable to the County of Ventura, to comply with Assembly Bill 3158, for the management and protection of Statewide Fish and Wildlife Trust Resources. Pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21089, and Fish and Game Code S: \Community Development \Everyone \Resolutions and Conditions \PC 422 conds gpa zc rpd ttm var Colmer rev2.doc Modified: 04/25/02 ! ^•r),4 -,, a �` RESOLUTION NO. PC- 2002 -422 GPA 2001 -01, TTM No. 5307, RPD No. 2001 -01, VAR 2002 -01 Page 15 Section 711.4, the project is not operative, vested or final until the filing fees are paid. 20. Miscellaneous Fees: Applicant shall pay to the City capital improvement, development, and processing fees at the rate and amount in effect at the time the fee is required to be paid. Said fees shall include but not be limited to Library Facilities Fees, Police Facilities Fees, Fire Facilities Fees, entitlement processing fees, and plan check and permit fees for buildings and public improvements. Further, unless specifically exempted by City Council, Applicant is subject to all fees imposed by City as of the issuance of the first permit for construction and such future fees imposed as determined by City in its sole discretion so long as said fee is imposed on similarly situated properties. 21. Cable Television: During construction, Developer shall allow all persons holding a valid cable television franchise issued by the City of Moorpark ( "Cable Franchisees ") to install any equipment or infrastructure (including conduit, power supplies, and switching equipment) necessary to provide Franchisee's services to all parcels and lots in the Project. Developer shall provide notice of its construction schedule to all Cable Franchisees sufficiently in advance of construction to allow the Cable Franchisees to coordinate installation of their equipment and infrastructure with that schedule. City shall provide Developer a list of Cable Franchisees upon Developer's request. 22. In the event the cable television services or their equivalent are provided to the Project or individual lots under collective arrangement or any collective means other than a Cable Franchisee (including, but not limited to, programming provided over a wireless or satellite system contained within the Project), the HOA shall pay monthly to City an access fee of five percent (5%) of gross revenue generated by the provision of those services, or the highest franchise fee required from any City Cable Franchisee, whichever is greater. "Gross revenue" is as defined in Chapter 5.06 of the Moorpark Municipal Code and any successor amendment or supplementary provision thereto. S: \Community Development \Everyone \Resolutions and Conditions \PC 422 conds gpa zc rpd ttm var Colmer rev2.doc Modified: 04/25/02 RESOLUTION NO. PC- 2002 -422 GPA 2001 -01, TTM No. 5307, RPD No. 2001 -01, VAR 2002 -01 Page 16 23. Disclosure Statement: Developer is required to record a Notice to Purchaser as notification and disclaimer to all buyers of lots in Tract 5307 of the future widening of Los Angeles Avenue adjacent to. the Tract and that homes adjacent to Los Angeles Avenue are subject to potential intrusive noise from traffic. Prior to recordation, the Notice to Purchaser shall be reviewed and approved by the City Attorney. The Notice to Purchaser will be signed by all future buyers to document acknowledgment of disclosure. 24. Redevelopment Area Affordable Housing Requirements: To meet the requirements of California Health and Safety Code 33410 et seq., as a condition of Tentative Tract Map No. 5307, Developer shall agree as follows: a. Low Income Units: i. Provide two (2) three (3) bedroom units of not less than 1,138 square feet in size, to be sold to buyers who meet the criteria for low income households established by the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development for the County of Ventura (80% of Median income). The first low income unit shall be constructed and a certificate of occupancy shall be issued no later than the construction and issuance of a certificate of occupancy for the seventh (7th) market rate unit of the project; and ii. The second low income unit shall be constructed and a certificate of occupancy shall be issued no later than the construction and issuance of a certificate of occupancy for the eighteenth (18th) market rate unit of the project. b. Very Low Income Unit: Provide one (1) three (3) bedroom unit of not less than 1,138 square feet in size, to be sold to buyers who meet the criteria for very low income households established by the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development for the County of Ventura (50% of Median income). The very low income unit shall be constructed and a certificate of occupancy shall be issued no later than the construction and issuance of S: \Community Development \Everyone \Resolutions and Conditions \PC 422 conds gpa zc rpd ttm var Colmer rev2.doc Modified: 04/25/02'^ RESOLUTION NO. PC- 2002 -422 GPA 2001 -01, TTM No. 5307, RPD No. 2001 -01, VAR 2002 -01 Page 17 a certificate of occupancy for the fifteenth (15th) market rate unit of the project. 25. Affordable Housing Implementation and Resale Restriction Plan and Affordable Housing Agreement: The initial sales price, location of the affordable units, buyer eligibility, resale restrictions, respective role of the City and the Developer, and any other item determined necessary by the City shall be set forth in an Affordable Housing Implementation and Resale Restriction Plan, which shall be approved by the City Council prior to recordation of the first final Tract Map for this project. The Developer and City shall, prior to the occupancy of the first residential unit for the Project, execute an Affordable Housing Agreement that incorporates the Plan in total and is consistent with Tract 5307 conditions of approval. 26. Affordable Housing Agreement Preparation Fee: Developer shall pay to City the amount of Seven Thousand Five Hundred Dollars ($7,500.00) for the City's cost to prepare the required affordable housing plan and agreement. B. COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT CONDITION: 27. Park and Recreational Facilities (Quimby) Fee: Prior to approval of Zoning Clearance for residential unit building permit, the subdivider shall pay fees in accordance with Section 8297 -4 of the City's Subdivision Ordinance (Parks and Recreation Facilities). The fee for the three affordable units shall be $4,000 per dwelling unit. The fee for the market rate units shall be determined based on Subdivision Ordinance requirements. C. CITY ENGINEER CONDITIONS: General Conditions: 28. The Developer shall post sufficient surety guaranteeing completion of all site improvements within the development and offsite improvements required by the conditions as described herein (i.e., grading, street improvements, storm drain improvements, landscaping, fencing, bridges, etc.) or which require removal (i.e., access ways, temporary debris basins, etc.) in a form acceptable to the City. S: \Community Development \Everyone \Resolutions and Conditions \PC 422 conds gpa zc rpd ttm var Colmer rev2.doc Modified: 04/25/02 �„y x,'23 RESOLUTION NO. PC- 2002 -422 GPA 2001 -01, TTM No. 5307, RPD No. 2001 -01, VAR 2002 -01 Page 18 29. The Developer shall indicate in writing to the City the disposition of any wells that may exist within the project. If any wells are proposed to be abandoned, or if they are abandoned and have not been properly sealed, they must be destroyed or abandoned per Ventura County Ordinance No. 2372 or Ordinance No. 3991 and per Division of Oil and Gas requirements. Permits for any well reuse (if applicable) shall conform to Reuse Permit procedures administered by the County Water Resources Development Department. 30. If hazardous materials are found on the site, the Developer shall stop all work and notify the City immediately. The Developer shall develop a plan that meets City, State and Federal requirements for its disposal. 31. The applicant shall comply with all pertinent County of Ventura Public Works Department water and sewer connection regulations implemented by the County of Ventura Public Works Department Waterworks District No. 1. 32. All existing and proposed utilities shall be under grounded as approved by the City Engineer. This also includes all existing above ground power lines adjacent to the project site along Flory Avenue (not Los Angeles Avenue) that are less than 67Kv. 33. Prior to improvement plan approval, the applicant shall submit plans to the Ventura County Fire Prevention Division and obtain the approval of the location of fire hydrants. 34. This project shall not create any non - conforming lots in violation of the Map Act or local ordinances. The Developer shall provide all easements and rights -of -way granted to the City free and clear of all liens and encumbrances. 35. Prior to any work being conducted within any State, County, or City right of way, the Developer shall obtain all necessary encroachment permits from the appropriate Agencies. Copies of these approved permits shall be provided to the City Engineer. Prior to Final Map Approval Conditions: 36. The Developer shall submit to the Department of Community Development and the City Engineer for review a current title report, which clearly states all interested parties S: \Community Development \Everyone \Resolutions and Conditions \PC 422 conds gpa zc rpd ttm var Colmer rev2.doc Modified: 04/25/02 eN op" RESOLUTION NO. PC- 2002 -422 GPA 2001 -01, TTM No. 5307, RPD No. 2001 -01, VAR 2002 -01 Page 19 and lenders included within the limits of the subdivision as well as any easements that affect the subdivision. 37. Any mapping that requires review and approval by the County of Ventura shall be concurrently submitted to the City Engineer for review and approval. Developer shall be responsible for all associated fees and review costs. 38. A final tract map prepared by a California Registered Engineer meeting all of the provisions of the Subdivision Map Act shall be submitted for review by the City Engineer. 39. Any lot -to -lot drainage easements and secondary drainage easement shall be delineated on the final map. Assurance in the form of an agreement shall be provided to the City that these easements shall be adequately maintained by property owners to safely convey storm water flows. Said agreement shall be submitted to the City Engineer for review and approval and shall include provisions for the owners association to maintain any private storm drain or National Pollution Discharge Elimination System, hereinafter NPDES system not maintained by a City Assessment District and shall be a durable agreement that is binding upon each future property owner of each lot. 40. On the Final Map, the Developer shall offer to dedicate to the City of Moorpark all right -of -way for public streets. 41. Prior to submittal of the Final Map to the City for review and prior to approval, the Developer shall transmit by certified mail a copy of the conditionally approved Tentative Map together with a copy of Section 66436 of the State Subdivision Map Act to each public entity or public utility that is an easement holder of record. Written evidence of compliance shall be submitted to the City Engineer. Grading Conditions: 42. All development areas and lots shall be designed and graded so that surface drainage is directed to acceptable locations or natural or improved drainage courses as approved by the City Engineer. Altered drainage methods and patterns onto adjacent properties shall not be allowed without mitigation. S: \Community Development \Everyone \Resolutions and Conditions \PC 422 conds gpa zc rpd ttm var Colmer rev2.doc Modified: 04/25/02 C.'^ RESOLUTION NO. PC- 2002 -422 GPA 2001 -01, TTM No. 5307, RPD No. 2001 -01, VAR 2002 -01 Page 20 43. ROC, NOx and dust during construction grading will be suppressed by the following activities: a. The fuel injection of all diesel engines used in construction equipment should be retarded two degrees from the manufacturer's recommendation. b. All diesel engines used in construction equipment should use high - pressure injectors. C. All diesel engines used in construction equipment should use reformulated diesel fuel. d. Construction grading shall be discontinued on days forecasted for first stage ozone alerts (concentration of 0.20 ppm) as indicated at the Ventura County Air Pollution Control District air quality monitoring station closest to the City of Moorpark. Grading and excavation operations shall not resume until the first stage smog alert expires. e. All clearing and grading activities shall cease during periods of high winds (i.e., greater than 15 miles per hour averaged over one hour) to prevent excessive amounts of fugitive dust. f. All material transported off -site shall be either sufficiently watered or securely covered to prevent excessive amounts of dust. g. All active portions of the site shall be either periodically watered or treated with environmentally safe dust suppressants to prevent excessive amounts of dust. h. Facilities shall be constructed and operated in accordance with the Rules and Regulations of the Ventura County Air Pollution Control District. i. Large -scale construction vehicles and trucks exiting the project site during the mass grading period shall be required to have tire wash -downs to minimize the dispersion of dust onto local streets. 44. Prior to issuance of the initial grading permit, the developer shall prepare an Erosion and Sediment Control Plan to address construction impacts and long -term operational effects on downstream environments and S: \Community Development \Everyone \Resolutions and Conditions \PC 422 conds gpa zc rpd ttm var Colmer rev2.doc Modified: 04/25/02 F* C ti ✓ . r RESOLUTION NO. PC- 2002 -422 GPA 2001 -01, TTM No. 5307, RPD No. 2001 -01, VAR 2002 -01 Page 21 watersheds. Certified Erosion and Sediment Control Professional or a qualified Civil Engineer shall prepare this plan. The use of jute or other artificial cover approved by the City Engineer will be required for all graded slopes during the period of October 1 through and inclusive of April 15. Proposed management efforts shall include (but not limited to) provisions for the use of vegetative filtering enhanced by creek bed reconstruction, preparation of detailed erosion control plans, appropriate use of temporary debris basins, silt fences, sediment traps and other erosion control practices. The proposed plan shall also address all relevant NPDES requirements and recommendations for the use of best available technology. The erosion control plan shall be reviewed and approved by the Community Development Director and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits for mass grading. Sediment yields in the watersheds within the project boundary shall be computed for pre - development and post- development conditions in accord with methods outlined in Erosion and Sediment Yields in the Transverse Ranges, Southern California (United States Geological Survey, 1978). These estimates of sediment yield shall be completed prior to initiating final design of the debris /detention basin facilities situated in the downstream portion of the project. 45. Temporary erosion control measures shall be used during the construction process to minimize water quality effects. Specific measures to be applied shall be identified in the project Erosion and Sediment Control Plan. The following water quality assurance techniques shall be included, but not limited to the following, as deemed necessary: a. Minimize removal of existing vegetation. b. Provide temporary soil cover, such as hydroseeding, jute blankets, mulch /binder and erosion control blankets, to protect exposed soil from wind and rain. C. Incorporate silt fencing, berms, and dikes to protect storm drain inlets and drainage courses. d. Rough grade contours to reduce flow concentrations and velocities. S: \Community Development \Everyone \Resolutions and Conditions \PC 422 conds gpa zc rpd ttm var Colmer rev2.doc Modified: 04/25/02 C,n n n .+e- RESOLUTION NO. PC- 2002 -422 GPA 2001 -01, TTM No. 5307, RPD No. 2001 -01, VAR 2002 -01 Page 22 e. Divert runoff from graded areas, using straw bale, earth, and sandbag dikes. f. Phase the grading to minimize soil exposure during the October through April rainy season. g. Install sediment traps or basins. h. Maintain and monitor erosion /sediment controls. 46. To minimize the water quality effects of permanent erosion sources, the following design features shall be incorporated into the project - grading plan to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. The City Engineer shall review and approve the grading plan to verify compliance with Best Management Practices features including, but not limited to the following: a. Drainage swales, subsurface drains, slope drains, storm drain inlet /outlet protection, and sediment traps. b. Check dams to reduce flow velocities. C. Permanent desilting basins. d. Permanent vegetation, including grass -lined swales. e. Design of drainage courses and storm drain outlets to reduce scour. 47. The following mitigation measures shall be implemented during all construction activities throughout build out of the project to minimize the impacts of project- related noise in the vicinity of the proposed project site: a. Construction activities shall be limited to between the following hours: a) 7:00 a.m. to 6 p.m. Monday through Friday, and b) 9:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. Saturday. Construction work on Saturdays will require payment of a premium for City inspection services and may be further restricted or prohibited should be City receive complaints from adjacent property owners. No construction work is to be done on Sundays and City observed holidays pursuant to Section 15.26.010 of the Municipal Code. b. Truck noise from hauling operations shall be minimized through establishing hauling routes that avoid S: \Community Development \Everyone \Resolutions and Conditions \PC 422 conds gpa zc rpd ttm var Colmer rev2.doc Modified: 04/25/02,C`'b 111" �* ^tl� vo. b v5 RESOLUTION NO. PC- 2002 -422 GPA 2001 -01, TTM No. 5307, RPD No. 2001 -01, VAR 2002 -01 Page 23 residential areas and requiring that "Jake Brakes" not be used along the haul route within the City. The hauling plan must be identified as part of the grading plan and shall be approved by the City Engineer. C. The Developer shall ensure that construction equipment is fitted with modern sound - reduction equipment. d. Stationary noise sources that exceed 70 dBA of continuous noise generation (at 50 feet) shall be shielded with temporary barriers if existing residences are within 350 feet of the noise source. e. Designated parking areas for construction worker vehicles and for materials storage and assembly shall be provided. These areas shall be set back as far as possible from or otherwise shielded from existing surrounding rural residential neighborhoods. f. Property owners and residents located within 600 feet of the project site, shall be notified in writing on a monthly basis of construction schedules involving major grading, including when clearing and grading is to begin. The project developer shall notify adjacent residents and property owners by Certified Mail - Return Receipt Requested of the starting date for removal of vegetation and commencement of site grading. The content of this required communication shall be approved by the City Engineer in advance of its mailing and the return receipts, evidencing United States mail delivery, shall be provided to the Engineering Department. g. A construction effects mitigation program shall be prepared and submitted to the City after completion and occupancy of the first phase of project build out. This program shall protect, to the degree feasible, new residents from the impacts of sustained construction. 48. The project shall be subdivided by a single final map. Grading and improvements shall be designed, bonded and constructed as a single project. 49. The Developer shall submit to the City of Moorpark for review and approval, a rough grading plan, consistent with S: \Community Development \Everyone \Resolutions and Conditions \PC 422 conds gpa zc rpd ttm var Colmer rev2.doc Modified: 04/25/02 A-,. ^ ^ wr �, .t RESOLUTION NO. PC- 2002 -422 GPA 2001 -01, TTM No. 5307, RPD No. 2001 -01, VAR 2002 -01 Page 24 the approved Tentative Map, prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer, shall enter into an agreement with the City of Moorpark to complete public improvements and shall post sufficient surety guaranteeing the construction of all improvements. 50. The final grading plan shall meet all UBC and City of Moorpark standards including slope setback requirements at lot lines, streets and adjacent to offsite lots. 51. Concurrent with submittal of the rough grading plan a sediment and erosion control plan shall be submitted to the City for review and approval by the City Engineer. The design shall include measures for irrigation and hydroseeding on all graded areas within 30 days of completion of grading unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer. Reclaimed water shall be used for dust control during grading, if available from Ventura County Waterworks District No. 1. 52. This project is projected to import soils onsite. Import /export operations requiring an excess of 100 total truckloads or 1,000 cubic yards of material shall require City Council approval prior to the commencement of hauling or staged grading operations. A haul route is to be submitted for review and approval by the City Engineer and Community Development Director. Additional surety for the cleaning and /or repair of the streets shall be required as directed by the City Engineer. Approval of the Haul Route Permit shall require the following: a. The haul route permit application shall be completed in its entirety including information indicating maximum quantity of dirt to be hauled. The haul shall be conducted only as permitted and no soil shall be transported to or from any site, via any route, during any time, or by any means except as specified in the permit. b. If import is coming from the east, the haul trucks shall enter the City from State Route 23 freeway and New Los Angeles Avenue interchange and proceed westerly to Flory Avenue, thence northerly along Flory Avenue to "A" Street, thence into the site. Empty haul trucks shall proceed northerly on Flory Avenue to S: \Community Development \Everyone \Resolutions and Conditions \PC 422 conds gpa zc rpd ttm var Colmer rev2.doc Modified: 04/25/02 n n n►- v .. ,, RESOLUTION NO. PC- 2002 -422 GPA 2001 -01, TTM No. 5307, RPD No. 2001 -01, VAR 2002 -01 Page 25 Third Street, thence westerly to Moorpark Avenue (State Route 23) and southerly to Los Angeles Avenue. If the haul is from the west, the haul trucks shall enter the City from Los Angeles Avenue and proceed easterly to Moorpark Avenue, thence northerly on Moorpark Avenue to Third Street, thence easterly on Third Street to Flory Avenue, thence southerly along Flory Avenue to "A" Street, thence into the site. Empty haul trucks shall proceed southerly on Flory Avenue to Los Angeles Avenue. At the time of the haul route permit, the City Engineer and Community Development Director may approve a revised route plan, including but not limited to a Millard Street access through the property directly east of Tract 5307, if construction on both sites is concurrent. C. The haul route permit application shall indicate the name of the dirt hauling company; the contractor's state license number; the contractor's City license number; proof of insurance per the City's requirements; the supervisor in charge, including work address, daytime work telephone numbers, a 24 -hour availability number and the number of days to complete the haul. d. The haul route permit application shall specify the starting and completion dates. No changes to the approved haul route, times and dates of operation, dust control, signage or traffic control shall be made without approval of the City Engineer and Community Development Director. e. The Developer shall procure a City Encroachment permit and post a cash bond in the amount of $500 per day for each day of operations approved by the City Engineer. The deposit shall be for payment of any costs incurred by the City related to the haul including but not necessarily limited to damage remediation, street cleaning, administration, inspection and monitoring of the permit. Upon certification by the City Engineer that the haul operation is completed and that, all damages to the City facilities and all costs to the City and its agents and contractors have been paid; the unused portion of the deposit shall be refunded. S: \Community Development \Everyone \Resolutions and Conditions \PC 422 conds gpa zc rpd ttm var Colmer rev2.doc Modified: 04/25/02 v , .� RESOLUTION NO. PC- 2002 -422 GPA 2001 -01, TTM No. 5307, RPD No. 2001 -01, VAR 2002 -01 Page 26 Should the costs to the City exceed the deposit amount, the Developer hauling the soil shall cease all work operations and deposit additional funds with the City, in an amount determined by the City Engineer, within 10 days of written demand by the City. f. The haul permit shall be subject to revocation or revisions by the City Council or the City Engineer. A copy of the permit shall be available for review on the site at all times. The truck trip counts and yardage hauled shall be tallied as the trucks enter the import site. A true copy of the tally sheets shall be delivered to the City Engineer, or his /her designee, at the end of each working day that the hauling occurs. g. The haul operation shall provide traffic control to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. h. Hauling operations shall be conducted only on weekdays (Monday through Friday) and during daylight hours and only between the hours of 9:00 AM and 4:00 PM on school days and between the hours of 8:00 AM and 5:00 PM on non - school days (school holidays). i. Appropriate traffic warning signs and devices and a flagger shall be provided at the entrances to the public way. The flagging operation shall be directed to controlling the entrance of the trucks used to haul the soil on and off the public street. Disruption of traffic on public streets due to the haul operation shall be reduced to the maximum extent practical. j. All portions of the haul route and intersecting streets within 500 feet of the haul route shall be swept continuously during haul operations. No less than two street sweepers shall be in operation over the portions of the haul route within City jurisdiction during haul operations and for 30 minutes after the haul operation hours. k. Haul operations shall be suspended on rain days. The suspension shall continue until soils on the import site have dried sufficiently that the haul truck tires do not pick up the soils. S: \Community Development \Everyone \Resolutions and Conditions \PC 422 conds gpa zc rpd ttm var n A"..,- „► -y,r) Calmer rev2.doc Modified: 04/25/02 C %-” � ti,• �.o RESOLUTION NO. PC- 2002 -422 GPA 2001 -01, TTM No. 5307, RPD No. 2001 -01, VAR 2002 -01 Page 27 1. The soil shall be wetted to optimum moisture (ASTM D- 1557) before loading. Each haul truck shall have all soil cleared from surfaces outside the bed before traveling on a public street. The tires of the haul trucks shall be cleaned of adhering soil before traveling on any public street. The soil may be covered by tarps during the haul as an alternative to wetting the soil to optimum moisture. M. Onsite haul routes and soil moisture conditioning measures shall be such to eliminate tracking or blowing soil onto City streets or adjoining property from the loading, hauling, dumping or distributing portions of the operation. Onsite operations shall be coordinated to avoid passage of haul trucks over wet soils that might adhere to the tires of the haul units. n. The haul permit shall be signed by both the hauling company and the Developer and shall bind both to the conditions of the permit. 53. The entire subdivision shall be graded in a single operation. 54. Temporary irrigation, hydroseeding and erosion control measures shall be implemented on all temporary grading. Temporary grading is defined to be any grading partially completed and any disturbance of existing natural conditions due to construction activity. These measures will apply to a temporary or permanent grading activity that remains or is anticipated to remain unfinished or undisturbed in its altered condition for a period of time greater than thirty (30) days except that during the rainy season these measures will be implemented immediately. 55. The maximum gradient for any slope shall not exceed a 2:1 slope inclination except where special circumstances exist. In the case of special circumstances where steeper slopes are warranted a certified soil engineer will review plans and their recommendations will be subject to the review and approval of the City Engineer and the Community Development Director. 56. All graded slopes shall be planted in a timely manner with groundcover, trees and shrubs that will stabilize slopes S: \Community Development \Everyone \Resolutions and Conditions \PC 422 conds gpa zc rpd ttm var Colmer rev2.doc Modified: 04/25/02 v ti. RESOLUTION NO. PC- 2002 -422 GPA 2001 -01, TTM No. 5307, RPD No. 2001 -01, VAR 2002 -01 Page 28 and minimize erosion. The planting will be to the satisfaction of the Community Development Director and the City Engineer. 57. So as to reduce debris from entering sidewalk and streets, the approved grading plan shall show a slough wall, approximately 18 inches high, with curb outlet drainage to be constructed behind the back of the sidewalk where slopes exceeding 4 feet in height are adjacent to sidewalk. The Developer shall use the City's standard slough wall detail during the design and construction. The City Engineer and Community Development Director shall approve all material for the construction of the wall. 58. Grading may occur during the rainy season from October 1st to April 15th subject to approval by the City Engineer and timely installation of erosion control facilities. Erosion control measures shall be in place and functional between October 1st and April 15th. In order to comply with the October 1st date, revised erosion control plans shall be submitted to the City Engineer no later than September 1st of each year from the start of grading or clearing operations to the time of grading bond release. 59. Prior to any work being conducted within any State, County, or City right of way, the Developer shall obtain all necessary encroachment permits from the appropriate Agencies. Copies of these approved permits will be provided to the City Engineer. 60. During site preparation and construction, the contractor shall minimize disturbance of natural groundcover on the .project site until such activity is required for grading and construction purposes. 61. During clearing, grading, earth moving or excavation operations regular watering shall control dust. In addition the following measures shall apply: a. Water all site access roads and material excavated or graded on or off -site to prevent excessive amounts of dust. Watering shall occur a minimum of at least two times daily, preferably in the late morning and after the completion of work for the day. Additional watering for dust control shall occur as directed by the City. The grading plan shall indicate the number S: \Community Development \Everyone \Resolutions and Conditions \PC 422 conds gpa zc rpd ttm var Colmer rev2.doc Modified: 04/25/02 e" 'r C •✓ . .� RESOLUTION NO. PC- 2002 -422 GPA 2001 -01, TTM No. 5307, RPD No. 2001 -01, VAR 2002 -01 Page 29 of water trucks that will be available for dust control at each phase of grading. b. Cease all clearing, grading, earth moving, or excavation operations during periods of high winds (greater than 15 mph averaged over one hour). The contractor shall maintain contact with the Air Pollution Control District (APCD) meteorologist for current information about average wind speeds. C. Water or securely cover all material transported off - site and on -site to prevent excessive amounts of dust. d. Keep all grading and construction equipment on or near the site, until these activities are completed. e. The area disturbed by clearing, grading, earth moving, or excavation operations shall be minimized to prevent excessive dust generation. f. Wash off heavy -duty construction vehicles before they leave the site. 62. After clearing, grading, earth moving, or excavation operations, and during construction activities, fugitive dust emissions should be controlled using the following procedures: a. Apply non - hazardous chemical stabilizers to all inactive portions of the construction site. When appropriate, seed exposed surfaces with a fast growing, soil binding plant to reduce wind erosion and its contribution to local particulate levels. b. Periodically, or as directed by the City Engineer, sweep public streets in the vicinity of the site to remove silt (i.e., fine earth material transported from the site by wind, vehicular activities, water runoff, etc.), which may have accumulated from construction activities. 63. During smog season (May - October) the City shall order that construction cease during Stage III alerts to minimize the number of vehicles and equipment operating, lower ozone levels and protect equipment operators from excessive smog levels. The City, at its discretion, may also limit construction during Stage II alerts. S: \Community Development \Everyone \Resolutions and Conditions \PC 422 conds gpa zc rpd ttm var Colmer rev2.doc Modified: 04/25/02 RESOLUTION NO. PC- 2002 -422 GPA 2001 -01, TTM No. 5307, RPD No. 2001 -01, VAR 2002 -01 Page 30 64. If any hazardous waste is encountered during the construction of this project, all work shall be immediately stopped and the Ventura County Environmental Health Department, the Fire Department, the Sheriff's Department, and the City Engineer shall be notified immediately. Work shall not proceed until clearance has been issued by all of these agencies. 65. The Developer shall utilize all prudent and reasonable measures (including- installation of a 6 -foot high chain link fence around the construction sites or provision of a full time licensed security guard) to prevent unauthorized persons from entering the work site at any time and to protect the public from accidents and injury. 66. Backfill of any pipe or conduit shall be in 4 -inch fully compacted layers unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer. 67. Soil testing for trench compaction shall be performed on all trenching and shall be done not less than once every 2 feet of lift and 100 lineal feet of trench excavated. Test locations shall be noted using street stationing with offsets from street centerlines. 68. Observe a 15 -mile per hour speed limit for the construction area. 69. During site preparation and construction, construct temporary storm water diversion structures per City of Moorpark standards. 70. The entire site shall be graded at the same time. Pads shall be graded, planted and landscaped to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Geotechnical /Geological Conditions: 71. Prior to submittal of grading plans the Developer shall have a geotechnical report prepared to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and at the minimum the geotechnical report shall address the following: a. All grading, foundations and structures shall be designed and constructed to comply with Chapter 70 of the Uniform Building Code (UBC) and applicable City and /or Country Grading Ordinances. Modifications to S: \Community Development \Everyone \Resolutions and Conditions \PC 422 conds gpa zc rpd ttm var Colmer rev2.doc Modified: 04/25/02 P, r,, ►q�- RESOLUTION NO. PC- 2002 -422 GPA 2001 -01, TTM No. 5307, RPD No. 2001 -01, VAR 2002 -01 Page 31 these standards shall be permitted only with the written concurrence of the City Engineer and the City's consulting geologist. b. An engineering geologist shall define the final grading requirements for residential facilities. All geological recommendations shall be reviewed and approved by the City Engineer and the City's consulting geologist. Foundation designs in areas where fault traces may be identified that are deemed inactive should address enhancing the stability of homes in the event minor movement occurs as a secondary effect of ground shaking. C. The developer shall cause an engineering geologist to study all unanticipated faults exposed during grading to detect any evidence of possible recent activity. All active fault lines will be clearly shown on the grading plan and final map. No structure shall be placed within 50 feet of any fault trace. d. All habitable structures shall be designed to accommodate structural impacts from 0.12g- ground acceleration or other standard factor of safety deemed applicable to this project. The standards shall be prepared to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. e. The developer shall contract with an engineering geologist to conduct geotechnical investigations and to prepare grading recommendations, foundation design criteria, and other recommendations regarding detailed project design. The soils engineer shall evaluate the condition of alluvium, liquefaction, expansive soils, seismic safety and unconsolidated soils. The soils report shall discuss the contents of the soils as to the presence or absence of any hazardous waste or other contaminants in the soils. Should the need for additional geotechnical studies be generated or required as a result of the geotechnical investigation, additional plan check fees will be required. Relatively loose soils or alluvium shall be densified or removed and recompacted prior to placement of structures upon such soils. Other mitigation measures shall be incorporated into the S: \Community Development \Everyone \Resolutions and Conditions \PC 422 conds gpa zc rpd ttm var Colmer rev2.doc Modified: 04/25/02 pf� ra r� n ►�y�n C. . �i RESOLUTION NO. PC- 2002 -422 GPA 2001 -01, TTM No. 5307, RPD No. 2001 -01, VAR 2002 -01 Page 32 final project design as required by the geological assessment. All geological recommendations shall be to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. f. Grading permits shall not be issued until 40 scale grading plans have been approved. The project shall be constructed in accord with the approved grading plans. g. Review of the Geotechnical Engineering Report, by the City's Geotechnical Engineer, is required. The Developer shall reimburse the City for all cost including the City's administrative fee for this review. h. All recommendations included in the approved Geotechnical Engineering Report shall be implemented during project design, grading, and construction in accordance with the approved project. The City's geotechnical consultant shall review all plans for conformance with the soil engineer's recommendations. Prior to the commencement of grading plan check, the Developer's geotechnical engineer shall sign the plans confirming that the grading plans incorporate the recommendations of the approved soil report(s). 72. Prior to issuance of a building permit, all habitable structures shall be designed to current UBC requirements or the City approved geotechnical report requirements for the project, whichever standard is most restrictive. 73. Prior to issuance of a building permit,. an as- graded geotechnical report and rough grading certification shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer and Geotechnical Engineer. Street Conditions: 74. In accordance with Business and Professions Code 8771 the street improvement plans shall provide for a surveyor's statement on the plans, certifying that all recorded monuments in the construction area have been located and tied out or will be protected in place during construction. S: \Community Development \Everyone \Resolutions and Conditions \PC 422 conds gpa zc rpd ttm var Colmer rev2.doc Modified: 04/25/02 „n r, IN 0-1 vvv r RESOLUTION NO. PC- 2002 -422 GPA 2001 -01, TTM No. 5307, RPD No. 2001 -01, VAR 2002 -01 Page 33 75. Monuments shall meet the City of Moorpark, County of Ventura Standards and shall be to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Mitigation of Traffic Impacts: 76. Traffic System Management Plan: Prior to the issuance of a Zoning Clearance for construction for each residential _unit, the permittee shall make a contribution to the Moorpark Traffic Systems Management (TSM) Fund of $1,444.00 per residential unit to fund TSM programs or clean -fuel vehicles programs as determined by the City. Commencing on January 1, 2005, and annually thereafter the Air Quality Fee shall be adjusted by any increase in the Consumer Price Index (CPI) until all fees have been paid. The CPI increase shall be determined by using the information provided by the U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, for all urban consumers within the Los Angeles /Anaheim /Riverside metropolitan area during the prior year. The calculation shall be made using the month of December over the prior month of December. In the event there is a decrease in the CPI for any annual indexing, the fee shall remain at its then current amount until such time as the next subsequent annual indexing which results in an increase. 77. Prior to the first Zoning Clearance for residential unit building permit, Developer shall pay a fair -share contribution for intersection improvements for Poindexter Road /Moorpark Avenue, Los Angeles Avenue /Moorpark Avenue, Los Angeles Avenue /Spring Road and Spring Road /High Street. The level of fair -share participation will be to the satisfaction of the City Engineer based on the traffic report prepared for the project and the extent of the impact to these intersections. 78. As a condition of the issuance of a building permit for each residential unit, Developer shall pay City a traffic mitigation fee as described herein ( "Citywide Traffic Fee "). The Citywide Traffic Fee may be expended by the City in its sole and unfettered discretion. On the effective date of approval of the tentative subdivision map, the amount of the Citywide Traffic Fee shall be $4,240 per S: \Community Development \Everyone \Resolutions and Conditions \PC 422 conds gpa zc rpd ttm var Colmer rev2.doc Modified: 04/25/02' -�''�yy Cv v. RESOLUTION NO. PC- 2002 -422 GPA 2001 -01, TTM No. 5307, RPD No. 2001 -01, VAR 2002 -01 Page 34 dwelling unit. Commencing January 1, 2003, and annually thereafter, the Citywide Traffic Fee shall be increased to reflect the change in the State Highway Bid Price Index for the twelve (12) month period that is reported in the latest issue of the Engineering News Record that is available on December 31 of the preceding year ( "annual indexing "). In the event there is a decrease in the referenced Index for any annual indexing, the Citywide Traffic Fee shall remain at its then current amount until such time as the next subsequent annual indexing which results in an increase. 79. The applicant shall contribute to the Los Angeles Avenue Area of Contribution (AOC) Fee Program. The Los Angeles Avenue AOC Fee shall be paid in accordance with City Council adopted AOC fee requirements in effect at the time of building permit application. The AOC Fee shall be paid prior to the issuance of Zoning Clearance for each building permit. Street Requirements: Los Angeles Avenue 80. The Developer shall irrevocably offer to dedicate for street purposes all the property south of the north property line wall to the satisfaction of City and Caltrans for Los Angeles Avenue street improvements to be constructed as a Los Angeles Avenue Area of Contribution (AOC) fee improvement project. The amount of property needed for the right -of -way for Los Angeles Avenue and the location of the sidewalk shall be as determined by the City Engineer and the Community Development Director. The Developer shall be required to install landscaping south of the property line wall in the area not required for street improvements and sidewalk. Landscaping along Los Angeles Avenue shall be shown on the landscape plan to be approved by the Community Development Director. If approved by the Community Development Director, City Engineer and Caltrans, the sidewalk width may be reduced to six (6) feet if determined necessary to achieve adequate landscape area adjacent to the southerly property line wall. S: \Community Development \Everyone \Resolutions and Conditions \PC 422 conds gpa zc rpd ttm var Colmer rev2.doc Modified: 04/25/02 v r. v 9 RESOLUTION NO. PC- 2002 -422 GPA 2001 -01, TTM No. 5307, RPD No. 2001 -01, VAR 2002 -01 Page 35 81. Pedestrian facilities shall meet all City and ADA requirements and shall be safe and visible from vehicle and pedestrian traffic along Los Angeles Avenue. 82. The Developer shall dedicate vehicular access rights to the City of Moorpark along Los Angeles Avenue on the final map. 83. An encroachment permit shall be obtained from Caltrans prior to construction of any proposed roadway or other improvements within their right -of -way. Any additional right -of -way required to implement the approved design for this work in their right -of -way, including slope easements for future grading, shall be acquired by the applicant and dedicated to the State in a manner acceptable to Caltrans and the City Engineer. All required dedications shall be illustrated on the Final Map. Proof of encroachment or other non -City permits and bonds shall be provided to the City Engineer prior to the start of any grading or construction activities. Citv Streets: 84. The Developer shall submit to the City of Moorpark for review and approval, street improvement plans prepared by a California Registered Civil Engineer; shall enter into an agreement with the City of Moorpark to complete public improvements; and shall post sufficient surety guaranteeing the construction of all improvements. Public streets shall conform to City of Moorpark requirements including all applicable ADA requirements. Street improvements shall be acceptable to the City Engineer and Community Development Director. 85. All streets shall conform to the design requirements of the Ventura County Road Standards (most recent revision), unless noted otherwise in the Conditions. 86. Pedestrian facilities shall meet all City and ADA requirements, shall be safe from vehicular traffic along "A" Street, Flory Avenue, and Los Angeles Avenue. Prior to approval of the improvement plans, Developer shall submit an ADA access exhibit to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. The exhibit shall denote how ADA access throughout the public right -of -way shall be accomplished. S: \Community Development \Everyone \Resolutions and Conditions \PC 422 conds gpa zc rpd ttm var Colmer rev2.doc Modified: 04/25/02"`�"'r, v L' v RESOLUTION NO. PC- 2002 -422 GPA 2001 -01, TTM No. 5307, RPD No. 2001 -01, VAR 2002 -01 Page 36 87. The street improvements shall include concrete curb and gutter, street lights, and signing, striping, interim striping and traffic control, paving, and any necessary transitions, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. The City Engineer and the Community Development Director shall approve all driveway locations. The Developer shall dedicate any additional right -of -way necessary to make all of the required improvements. 88. Entry monumentation that does not- interfere with sight - distance or turning movements shall be incorporated into the project entrance planning at Los Angeles Avenue and Flory Avenue. Landscaping shall be provided appropriate to the entry that will not interfere with sight- distance or turning movement operations. The final design for the project entrance shall be reviewed and approved by the Community Development Director and the City Engineer prior to the issuance of the building permits. 89. "A" Street shall be constructed per modified Ventura County Standard Plate B -6 -B, 44 foot right -of -way; containing two 12 -foot wide travel lanes, one 4 -foot wide bike lane, one 8 -foot wide parking lane, and two 3.5 foot wide sidewalks, not including top of curb. "A" Street shall have parking omitted from the north side. "No Stopping" signs shall be placed at each end of "A" Street and at intervals not exceeding 175 feet. A 5 feet wide Public Utility Easement (P.U.E.) shall be provided adjacent to the street right -of- way. The maximum grade within the P.U.E. shall be 2 %. Developer shall demonstrate conformance to ADA access requirements at all locations including driveway locations. An ADA plan shall be reviewed and approved by the City Engineer and help on file to show conformance to those requirements. Improvement plans will detail all locations where utilities or other improvements conflict with normal walk locations. The Final Tract Map and Improvement Plans will reflect all such locations that affect lot lines and right -of -way lines. 90. At the easterly end of "A" Street the Developer shall construct a "hammerhead" turnaround to meet the minimum requirements of the fire department. Improvements shall provide access to the property that bounds the easterly boundary along the turnaround. If necessary, the Developer S: \Community Development \Everyone \Resolutions and Conditions \PC 422 conds gpa zc rpd ttm var Colmer rev2.doc Modified: 04/25/02 RESOLUTION NO. PC- 2002 -422 GPA 2001 -01, TTM No. 5307, RPD No. 2001 -01, VAR 2002 -01 Page 37 shall procure any additional right of way. The final map and improvement plans shall make provisions for this. Improvements and mapping shall be to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 91. Driveways shall be designed in accordance with the latest APWA Standards. 92. Above ground obstructions (utility cabinets, mailboxes, etc.) are to be placed within the right -of -way landscaping areas. When above ground obstructions are to be placed within the sidewalk, a minimum 3.5 feet clear sidewalk width must be provided around the obstruction. 93. The Developer shall submit wall and landscaping plans showing that provisions have been taken to provide for and maintain proper sight distances. All fences, walls and other structures over six (6) feet high are to be submitted to and approved by the Community Development Director and the City Engineer. 94. The Developer shall dedicate vehicular access rights to the City of Moorpark along Flory Avenue. 95. Prior to recordation of final maps, the proposed street name shall be submitted to the Fire District's Communications Center for review and approval. Approved street names shall be shown on the final map. Street name signs shall be installed in conjunction with the road improvements. The type of sign shall be in accordance with Plate F -4 of the Ventura County Road Standards. 96. Prior to approval of the final Tentative Map, the proposed infrastructure plan for the project shall be designed to place all required water, sewer and storm drains in "A" Street from the tract to Millard Street. The applicant shall obtain all necessary right -of -way and easements to install the required infrastructure in this alignment. The City may assist with the acquisition of such easements. 97. Any right -of -way acquisition necessary to complete the required improvements shall be acquired by the Developer at its expense. S: \Community Development \Everyone \Resolutions and Conditions \PC 422 conds gpa zc rpd ttm var Colmer rev2.doc Modified: 04/25/02 RESOLUTION NO. PC- 2002 -422 GPA 2001 -01, TTM No. 5307, RPD No. 2001 -01, VAR 2002 -01 Page 38 Street Lighting Conditions: 98. Streetlights shall be provided on the improvement plans per Ventura County Standards and as approved by the City Engineer. Prior to final map recordation, the Developer shall pay all energy costs associated with public street lighting for a period of one year from the acceptance of the street improvements. Drainage Requirements: 99. The applicant shall make a pro -rata contribution to the mitigation of cumulative regional drainage deficiencies, should the City adopt such a program prior to issuance of the first building permit. 100. The Developer shall submit to the City of Moorpark for review and approval, drainage plans; hydrologic and hydraulic calculations prepared by a California Registered Civil Engineer; shall enter into an agreement with the City of Moorpark to complete improvements and shall post sufficient surety guaranteeing the construction of all improvements. 101. The plans shall depict all on -site and off -site drainage structures required by the City. 102. The drainage plans and calculations shall relate to conditions before and after development. Quantities of water, water flow rates, major watercourses, drainage areas and patterns, diversions, collection systems, flood hazard areas, sumps, sump locations, detention and NPDES facilities and drainage courses will be addressed. 103. Hydrology shall be per the current Ventura County Flood Control Standards except as follows: a. All storm drains shall carry a 10 -year frequency storm. b. All catch basins shall carry a 10 -year storm. c. All catch basins in a sump condition shall be sized such that depth of water at intake shall equal the depth of the approach flows. d. All culverts shall carry a 100 -year frequency storm. S: \Community Development \Everyone \Resolutions and Conditions \PC 422 conds gpa zc rpd ttm va Colmer rev2.doc Modified: 04/25/02 RESOLUTION NO. PC- 2002 -422 GPA 2001 -01, TTM No. 5307, RPD No. 2001 -01, VAR 2002 -01 Page 39 104. Surface flows shall be intercepted, detained and given sufficient time to provide storm water clarification by "passive" BMP systems prior to entering collector or storm drain systems. 105. Under a 10 -year frequency storm, local, residential and private streets shall have one dry travel lane available on interior residential streets. Collector streets shall have a minimum of one dry travel lane in each direction. 106. "After- development" drainage to adjacent parcels shall not be increased above "Pre- development" drainage quantities nor will surface runoff be concentrated by this development. All drainage measures necessary to mitigate storm water flows shall be provided to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 107. Drainage grates shall not be used at any location accessible by pedestrian, bicycle or equestrian traffic. 108. The grading plan shall also show contours indicating the 50- and 100 -year flood levels. 109. All flows that have gone through flow attenuation and clarification by use of acceptable BMP systems and are flowing within brow ditches, ribbon gutters, storm drain channels, area drains and similar devices shall be deposited directly into the storm drain system and shall be restricted from entering streets. If necessary, the storm drain system shall be extended to accept these flows. Both storm drains and easements outside the public right -of -way are to be privately maintained unless otherwise approved by the City Council. 110. Concrete surface drainage structures exposed to the public view, shall be tan colored concrete, as approved by the Community Development Director, and to the extent possible shall incorporate natural structure and landscape to reduce their visibility. 111. In order to comply with California Regional Water Quality Control Board requirements no curb outlets will be allowed for pad drainage onto the street. The Developer shall inform all new and future homeowners that future improvements such as pool construction or other private improvements require observance of the same requirements. S: \Community Development \Everyone \Resolutions and Conditions \PC 422 conds gpa zc rpd ttm var Colmer rev2.doc Modified: 04/25/02 C RESOLUTION NO. PC- 2002 -422 GPA 2001 -01, TTM No. 5307, RPD No. 2001 -01, VAR 2002 -01 Page 40 This notification agreement shall be acknowledged by each homeowner and recorded with each property and enforced by any proposed Homeowners Association. 112. Drainage devices for the development shall be designed and installed with all necessary appurtenances to safely contain and convey storm flows to their final point of discharge to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 113. A hydraulic /hydrologic study shall be prepared which analyzes the hydraulic capacity of the drainage system, with and without the storm drain system for the proposed development. The Developer shall make any downstream improvements, required by the City, to support the proposed development. 114. Improvements shall be constructed to detain drainage on- site when the drainage amount is between the ten -year and fifty -year storm event. A rainfall intensity Zone K shall be utilized in the design unless alternate design intensity is approved by the City Engineer. 115. Developer shall improve the storm drain facility immediately adjacent to and east of the site (Fremont Drain) and extend these facilities upstream to Millard Street. In addition, Developer shall provide a hydrology study to determine the Developer's pro -rata share of the cost to construct Fremont Drain (total cost estimated $428,000) based on City of Moorpark Master Plan of Drainage (April 1995). The cost estimate shall be adjusted based on latest Quarterly State Highway Bid Price Index Chart from Engineering News Record, The Construction Weekly magazine. 116. The Developer shall demonstrate, for each building pad within the development area, that the following restrictions and protections can be put in place to the satisfaction of the City Engineer: a. Adequate protection from a 100 -year frequency storm; b. Feasible access during a 50 -year frequency storm. C. Hydrology calculations shall be per current Ventura County Flood Control Standards. S: \Community Development \Everyone \Resolutions and Conditions \PC 422 conds gpa zc rpd ttm var Colmer rev2.doc Modified: 04/25/02 RESOLUTION NO. PC- 2002 -422 GPA 2001 -01, TTM No. 5307, RPD No. 2001 -01, VAR 2002 -01 Page 41 d. All structures proposed within the 100 -year flood zone shall be elevated at least one foot above the 100 -year flood level. 117. The Developer shall provide for all necessary on -site and off -site storm drain facilities to the satisfaction of the City Engineer to accommodate upstream and on -site flows. Facilities, as shown on existing drainage studies and approved by the City Engineer, shall be delineated on the final drainage plans. Either on -site detention basins or storm water acceptance deeds from off -site property owners must be specified. 118. The design of the storm drain system shall provide for adequate width easements for future maintenance and reconstruction of facilities particularly those facilities that are deeper than 8 feet. In addition all facilities shall have all- weather vehicular access. This design shall be to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 119. Engineering and geotechnical reports shall be provided to prove, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer, that all "passive" NPDES facilities meet their intended use and design. These facilities shall meet the minimum requirements relating to water retention and clarification. 120. The Developer shall demonstrate and certify to the satisfaction of the City Engineer that all existing storm drain culverts within the site shall perform in an acceptable manner based on their intended design and the proposed increase /decrease of loading conditions, introduction of surface water within subsurface areas that may affect the culvert and proposed construction. This especially includes cast -in -place concrete pipe (CIPP). National Pollutant Discharqe Elimination System ( NPDES) Requirements: 121. Prior to the issuance of any construction /grading permit and /or the commencement of any clearing, grading or excavation, the Developer shall submit a Storm Water Pollution Control Plan (SWPCP) to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. S: \Community Development \Everyone \Resolutions and Conditions \PC 422 conds gpa zc rpd ttm var Colmer rev2.doc Modified: 04/25/02 C.,r •,.. �.. RESOLUTION NO. PC- 2002 -422 GPA 2001 -01, TTM No. 5307, RPD No. 2001 -01, VAR 2002 -01 Page 42 122. The SWPCP shall be developed and implemented in accordance with requirements of the Ventura Countywide Storm Water Quality Management Program, NPDES Permit No. CAS004002. 123. The SWPCP shall identify potential pollutant sources that may affect the quality of discharges to storm water and shall include the design and placement of recommended Best Management Practices (BMPs) to effectively prohibit the entry of pollutants from the construction site into the storm drain system. 124. Improvement plans shall note that the contractor shall comply to the "California Storm Water Best Management Practice Handbooks." 125. Prior to the issuance of any construction /grading permit and /or the commencement of any clearing, grading or excavation, the Developer shall also submit a Notice of Intent (NOI) to the California State Water Resources Control Board, Storm Water Permit Unit in accordance with the NPDES Construction General Permit (No. CASQ00002): Waste Discharge Requirements for Discharges of Storm Water Runoff Associated with Construction Activities). The Developer shall comply with all requirements of this General Permit including preparation of a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan ( SWPPP). 126. The Developer shall obtain a permit from the State Water Resources Control Board for "All storm water discharges associated with a construction activity where clearing, grading, and excavation results in land disturbances of five or more acres." The Developer shall submit a copy of the Notice of Intent (NOI ) to the City Engineers office as proof of permit application. 127. The Developer shall also comply with NPDES objectives as outlined in the "Storm Water Pollution Control Guidelines for Construction Sites." 128. Prior to Final Map approval, Developer will provide facilities to comply with NPDES requirements. Runoff from developed areas shall be diverted to detention basins, "passive- devices" or other passive Best Management Practices (BMP's) to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. A California registered civil engineer shall propose and design these devices as part of the drainage improvement S: \Community Development \Everyone \Resolutions and Conditions \PC 422 conds gpa zc rpd ttm var Colmer rev2.doc Modified: 04/25/02 RESOLUTION NO. PC- 2002 -422 GPA 2001 -01, TTM No. 5307, RPD No. 2001 -01, VAR 2002 -01 Page 43 plans for the project. Provisions shall be made by the Developer to provide for maintenance in perpetuity. 129. Prior to City issuance of the initial grading permit, the applicant shall obtain all necessary NPDES related permits. The grading permits issued for the development shall require applicant to provide schedules and procedures for onsite maintenance of earthmoving and other heavy equipment and documentation of proper disposal of used oil and other lubricants. The onsite maintenance of all equipment that can be performed offsite will not be allowed. 130. The project construction plans shall state that the contractor shall comply with the "California Storm Water Best Management Practice Handbooks" - Best Management Practices (BMPs) applicable to the development and to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Said requirements shall include the following: a. All onsite storm drain inlets shall be labeled "Don't Dump Drains to Arroyo." b. No outdoor vehicle maintenance shall be allowed. C. All common area property locations shall be maintenance free of litter and debris. d. All onsite storm drains shall be cleaned, using approved methods, at least twice a year, once immediately prior to October 1, the rainy season, and once in January. e. All common sidewalks, walkways, and parking areas shall be swept regularly to prevent the accumulation of litter and debris from entering the storm drain. f. No cleaning agent must be discharged into a storm drain system. If any cleaning agent or degreaser is used, wash water shall not be discharged to the storm drain but shall be discharged to the sanitary sewer. Discharges to the sanitary sewer are subject to the review and approval of the County Waterworks District No. 1. g. The City will require that "passive" devices and BMP's be used to comply with NPDES water quality requirements. The Developer shall provide the City S: \Community Development \Everyone \Resolutions and Conditions \PC 422 conds gpa zc rpd ttm var Colmer rev2.doc Modified: 04/25/02 RESOLUTION NO. PC- 2002 -422 GPA 2001 -01, TTM No. 5307, RPD No. 2001 -01, VAR 2002 -01 Page 44 with a Maintenance Program for such devices. The CC &R's shall include a requirement that the Developer /HOA shall maintain, in perpetuity, such devices in a manner consistent with specific requirements to be detailed within the Maintenance Program. Alternatively the developer shall provide BMP's conforming to Ventura County Municipal Storm Water NPDES Permit No. CAS004002 to the satisfaction of the - City Engineer. This alternative may require dedicating one lot to satisfy the NPDES provisions. 131. Prior to the starting of grading or any ground disturbance the Developer shall employ a full -time superintendent for NPDES compliance. The NPDES superintendent shall have no other duties than NPDES compliance, shall be present, on the project site Monday through Friday and on all other days when the probability of rain is 40% or higher and prior to the start of and during all grading or clearing operations until the release of grading bonds. The NPDES superintendent shall have full authority to hire personnel, bind the developer in contracts, rent equipment and purchase materials to the extent needed to effectuate Best Management Practices. The NPDES superintendent shall provide proof to the City Engineer of attendance and satisfactory completion of courses satisfactory to the City Engineer totaling no less than 8 hours directed specifically to NPDES compliance and effective use of Best Management Practices. Proof of such attendance and completion shall be provided to the City Engineer prior to employment to the NPDES superintendent. In addition, an NPDES superintendent shall be employed to assume NPDES compliance during the construction of streets, storm drainage systems, all utilities, buildings and final landscaping of the site. Acquisition of Easements and Right of Way: 132. If any of the improvements which the applicant is required to construct or install is to be constructed or installed upon land in which the applicant does not have title or interest sufficient for such purposes, the applicant shall do all of the following at least 60 days prior to the S: \Community Development \Everyone \Resolutions and Conditions \PC 422 conds gpa zc rpd ttm var Colmer rev2.doc Modified: 04/25/02•s� RESOLUTION NO. PC- 2002 -422 GPA 2001 -01, TTM No. 5307, RPD No. 2001 -01, VAR 2002 -01 Page 45 filling of the final or parcel map for approval pursuant to Governmental Code Section 66457: a. Notify the City of Moorpark (hereinafter City) in writing that the applicant wishes the City to acquire an interest in the land, which is sufficient for the purposes as provided in Governmental Code Section 66462.5. b. Supply the City with: (i)_ a legal description of the interest to be acquired, (ii) a map or diagram of the interest to be acquired sufficient to satisfy the requirements of subdivision (e) of Section 1250.310 of the Code of Civil procedure, (iii) a current appraisal report prepared by an appraiser approved by the City which expresses an opinion as to the fair market value of the interest to be acquired, and (iv) a current Litigation Guarantee Report. C. Enter into an agreement with the City, guaranteed by such cash deposits or other security as the City may require, pursuant to which the applicant will pay all of the City's cost (including, without limitation, attorney's fees and overhead expenses) of acquiring such an interest in the land. Prior to Issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the Following Conditions shall be Satisfied: 133. If directed by the City, the Developer shall have repaired, overlayed or slurried that portion of Flory Avenue and /or Los Angeles Avenue adjacent to the development damaged as a result of project related construction work or utility trenching. The repairs, curb replacement, parkways, sidewalks, and overlay or slurry of the street, as a result of damage from construction work or utility trenching shall be along the entire length of the project including transitions unless otherwise approved and shall be completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 134. A copy of the recorded Map(s) shall be forwarded to the City Engineer for filing. 135. A final grading certification shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer. S: \Community Development \Everyone \Resolutions and Conditions \PC 422 conds gpa zc rpd ttm var Colmer rev2.doc Modified: 04/25/02 C v' v RESOLUTION NO. PC- 2002 -422 GPA 2001 -01, TTM No. 5307, RPD No. 2001 -01, VAR 2002 -01 Page 46 Prior to Acceptance of Public Improvements and Bond Exonerations, the Following Conditions shall be Satisfied: 136. Reproducible centerline tie sheets shall be submitted to the City Engineer's office. 137. Sufficient surety in a form and in an amount acceptable to the City guaranpteeing the public improvements shall be provided, and shall remain in place for one year following acceptance by the City. 138. Original "as built" plans shall be certified by the Developer's Registered Civil Engineer and submitted with two sets of blue prints to the City Engineer's office. These "as built" plans shall incorporate all plan revisions. Although grading plans may have been submitted for checking and construction on sheets larger than 22" X 36 ", they shall be resubmitted as "record drawings" in a series of 22" X 36" mylars (made with proper overlaps) with a title block on each sheet. Submission of "as built" plans is required before a final inspection is scheduled. Electronic files shall be submitted for all improvement plans in a format to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. In addition, Developer shall provide an electronic file update on the City's Master Base Map electronic file, incorporating all storm drainage, water and sewer mains, lines and appurtenances and any other utility facility available for this project. D. FIRE DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS: 139. Prior to combustible construction, an all weather access road /driveway suitable for use by a 20 ton Ventura County Fire Protection District (Fire District) vehicle shall be installed. 140. All access roads /driveways shall have a minimum vertical clearance of 13 feet 6 inches (13'6 "). 141. Approved turnaround areas for fire apparatus shall be provided when dead -end Fire District access roads /driveways exceed 150 feet. Turnaround areas shall not exceed a 2.5% cross slope in any direction and shall be located within 150 feet of the end of the access road /driveway. S: \Community Development \Everyone \Resolutions and Conditions \PC 422 conds gpa zc rpd ttm var Colmer rev2.doc Modified: 04/25/02 RESOLUTION NO. PC- 2002 -422 GPA 2001 -01, TTM No. 5307, RPD No..2001 -01, VAR 2002 -01 Page 47 142. Public and private roads shall be named if serving more than four (4) parcels. 143. Prior to recordation of street names, proposed names shall be submitted to the Fire District's Communications Center for review. 144. Street name signs shall be installed in conjunction with the road improvements. The type of sign shall be in accordance with City of Moorpark Road Standards. 145. Address numbers, a minimum of 4 inches high, shall be installed prior to occupancy, shall be of contrasting color to the background, and shall be readily visible at night. Where structures are set back more than 150 feet from the street, larger numbers will be required so that they are distinguishable from the street. In the event, the structure(s) is not visible from the street, the address number(s) shall be posed adjacent to the driveway entrance. 146. A plan shall be submitted to the Fire District for review indicating the method in which buildings are to be identified by address numbers. 147. Prior to construction, the applicant shall submit plans to the Fire District for placement of fire hydrants. On plans, show existing hydrants within 500 feet of the development. Indicate the type of hydrant, number and size of outlets. 148. Fire hydrants shall be installed and in service prior to combustible construction and shall conform to the minimum standards of the City of Moorpark Water Works Manual. a. Each hydrant shall be a 6 -inch wet barrel design and shall have one (1) 4 inch and one (1) 2 1/2 -inch outlet. b. The required fire flow shall be achieved at no less than 20psi residual pressure. C. Fire hydrants shall be spaced 500 feet on center, and so located that no structure will be farther than 250 feet from any one hydrants. d. Fire hydrants shall be set back from the curb face 24 inches on center. S: \Community Development \Everyone \Resolutions and Conditions \PC 422 conds gpa zc rpd ttm var Colmer rev2.doc Modified: 04/25/02 RESOLUTION NO. PC- 2002 -422 GPA 2001 -01, TTM No. 5307, RPD No. 2001 -01, VAR 2002 -01 Page 48 e. No obstructions, including walls, trees, light and sign posts, meter, and shall be placed within three (3) feet of any hydrant. f. A contract pad shall be installed extending 18 inches out from the fire hydrant. g. Ground clearance to the lowest operating nut shall be between 18 to 24 inches. 149. Prior to - occupancy of any structure, blue reflective hydrant location marketers shall be placed on the access roads in accordance with Fire District standards. If the final asphalt cap is not in place at time of occupancy, hydrant location markers shall still be installed and shall be replaced when the final asphalt cap is completed. 150. Prior to map recordation, the applicant shall provide to the Fire District, verification from the water purveyor that the purveyor can provide the required fire flow of 1,000 gallons per minute at 20 psi. 151. Any structure greater than 5,000 square feet in area and /or 5 miles from a fire station shall be provided with an automatic fire sprinkler system in accordance with current Fire District Ordinance. 152. Plans for all fire sprinkler systems shall be submitted, with payment for plan check, to the Fire District for review and approval prior to installation. 153. Applicant shall submit a phasing plan to the Fire Department for review and approval prior to construction. 154. A copy of all recorded maps shall be provided to the Fire District within seven (7) days of recordation of said map. E. VENTURA COUNTY WATERWORKS DISTRICT NO. 1 CONDITIONS: 155. Prior to issuance of a building permit, provide Ventura County Waterworks District the following: a. Water and sewer improvement plans in the format required. b. Hydraulic analysis by a registered Civil Engineer to determine the adequacy of the proposed and existing water and sewer lines. S: \Community Development \Everyone \Resolutions and Conditions \PC 422 conds gpa zc rpd ttm var Colmer rev2.doc Modified: 04/25/02 RESOLUTION NO. PC- 2002 -422 GPA 2001 -01, TTM No. 5307, RPD.No. 2001 -01, VAR 2002 -01 Page 49 c. Copy of approval of fire hydrant locations by County of Ventura Fire Protection District. d. Copy of Release from Calleguas Municipal Water District. e. Cost estimates for water and sewer improvements. f. Fees: Plan check, construction inspection, capital improvement charge, sewer connection fee and water meter charge. g. Signed Contract to install all improvements and a Surety Bond. E. VENTURA COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT CONDITIONS: 156. No direct storm drain connections to Ventura County Flood Control District facilities will be allowed without appropriate Best Management Practices (BMP's) for compliance with Ventura Countywide Stormwater Program. 157. Cross Connection Control Devices: At the time water service connection is made, cross connection control devices shall be installed on the water system in a manner approved by the County Waterworks District No. 1. S: \Community Development \Everyone \Resolutions and Conditions \PC 422 conds gpa zc rpd ttm var Colmer rev2.doc Modified: 04/25/02 e-"d'a RESOLUTION NO. PC- 2002 -422 GPA 2001 -01, TTM No. 5307, RPD No. 2001 -01, VAR 2002 -01 Page 50 EXHIBIT D CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR RESIDENTIAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 2001 -01 AND VARIANCE 2002 -01 A. DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CONDITIONS: 1. The Residential Planned Development permit is granted for the land and project as identified on the entitlement application form and as shown on the plot plans and elevations incorporated herein by reference as Exhibit "A ". The location and design of all site improvements shall be as shown on the approved plot plans and elevations except or unless indicated otherwise herein in the following conditions. 2. Use Inauguration: Unless the Residential Development Permit is inaugurated (building foundation slab in place and substantial work in progress) not later than three (3) years after this permit is granted, this permit shall automatically expire on that date. The Community Development Director may, at his /her discretion, grant up to two (2) one (1) year extensions for project inauguration if there have been no changes in the adjacent areas and if Applicant can document that he /she has diligently worked towards inauguration of the project during the initial three -year period and the Applicant has concurrently requested a time extension to the tentative tract map. The request for extension of this entitlement shall be made at least 30 -days prior to the expiration date of the permit. 3. Other Regulations: The design, maintenance, and operation of the permit area and facilities thereon shall comply with all applicable regulations of the applicable zone and all requirements and enactment's of Federal, State, County, and City authorities, and all such requirements and enactment's shall, by reference, become conditions of this permit. 4. Duplication of Conditions: All mitigation measures contained within the approved Mitigation Monitoring Report and Program (MMRP) are hereby adopted as requirements of the Residential Planned Development Permit, as applicable. Where conflict or duplication between the MMRP and the conditions of approval occur and applicability for compliance is questioned by the Developer, the Community S: \Community Development \Everyone \Resolutions and Conditions \PC 422 conds gpa zc rpd ttm var Colmer rev2.doc Modified: 04/25/02 In w?,- .�+,r' C v a_ w� RESOLUTION NO. PC- 2002 -422 GPA 2001 -01, TTM No. 5307, RPD No. 2001 -01, VAR 2002 -01 Page 51 Development Director will determine the applicable condition compliance requirements for each phase of development. 5. Image Conversion of Plans: Prior to issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy, the builder shall pay to the City a fee for the image conversion of building permit plans as determined by the Community Development Director into an electronic imaging format acceptable to the City Clerk. 6. Public Nuisance: The Community Development Director may declare a development project that is not in compliance with the Conditions of Approval or for some other just cause, a "public nuisance." The Applicant shall be liable to the City for any and all costs and expenses to the City involved in thereafter abating the nuisance and in obtaining compliance with the conditions of approval or applicable codes. If the Applicant fails to pay all City costs related to this action, the City may enact special assessment proceedings against the parcel of land upon which the nuisance existed (Municipal Code Section 1.12.080). 7. Redevelopment Area Affordable Housing Requirements: To meet the requirements of California Health and Safety Code 33410 et seq., as a condition of Tentative Tract Map No. 5307, Developer shall agree as follows: a. Low Income Units: i. Provide two (2) three (3) bedroom units of not less than 1,138 square feet in size, to be sold to buyers who meet the criteria for low income households established by the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development for the County of Ventura (80% of Median income). The first low income unit shall be constructed and a certificate of occupancy shall be issued no later than the construction and issuance of a certificate of occupancy for the seventh (7th) market rate unit of the project; and ii. The second low income unit shall be constructed and a certificate of occupancy shall be issued no later than the construction and issuance of a S: \Community Development \Everyone \Resolutions and Conditions \PC 422 conds gpa zc rpd ttm var Colmer rev2.doc Modified: 04/25/02 RESOLUTION NO. PC- 2002 -422 GPA 2001 -01, TTM No. 5307, RPD No. 2001 -01, VAR 2002 -01 Page 52 certificate of occupancy for the eighteenth (18th) market rate unit of the project. b. Very Low Income Unit: Provide one (1) three (3) bedroom unit of not less than 1,138 square feet in size, to be sold to buyers who meet the criteria for very low income households established by the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development for the County of Ventura (50% of Median income). The very low income unit shall be constructed and a certificate of occupancy shall be issued no later than the construction and issuance of a certificate of occupancy for the fifteenth (15th) market rate unit of the project. 8. Affordable Housing Implementation and Resale Restriction Plan and Affordable Housing Agreement: The initial sales price, location of the affordable units, buyer eligibility, resale restrictions, respective role of the City and the Developer, and any other item determined necessary by the City shall be set forth in an Affordable Housing Implementation and Resale Restriction Plan, which shall be approved by the City Council prior to recordation of the first final Tract Map for this project. The Developer and City shall, prior to the occupancy of the first residential unit for the Project, execute an Affordable Housing Agreement that incorporates the Plan in total and is consistent with Tract 5307 conditions of approval. 9. Affordable Housing Agreement Preparation Fee: Developer shall pay to City the amount of Seven Thousand Five Hundred Dollars ($7,500.00) for the City's cost to prepare the required affordable housing plan and agreement. 10. Outstanding Case Processing Costs: The Applicant shall pay all outstanding case processing (Planning and Engineering), and all applicable City legal service fees within sixty (60) days of approval of this RPD Permit. The applicant, permittee, or successors in interest shall also submit to the Department of Community Development a fee to cover costs incurred by the City for Condition Compliance review of the RPD Permit. S: \Community Development \Everyone \Resolutions and Conditions \PC 422 conds gpa zc rpd ttm var Colmer rev2.doc Modified: 04/25/02 C .r RESOLUTION NO. PC- 2002 -422 GPA 2001 -01, TTM No. 5307, RPD No. 2001 -01, VAR 2002 -01 Page 53 11. Design /Development Standards: Prior to issuance of a Zoning Clearance, the building elevations shall be revised to be consistent with the conditions of approval for this Residential Planned Development Permit and Tentative Tract Map No. 5307, subject to Community Development Director approval. 12. All garage doors shall be rollup. A minimum of 20 feet shall be provided in front of each door. 13. Each residence shall maintain the established setbacks for the project as shown on the approved plot plan, except that the minimum setbacks for the main structure are as follows: front yard, 16 feet to the house and 20 feet to the garage; side yard, 5 feet; street side yard, 19 feet; and rear yard, 10 feet. 14. Accessory structures minimum five (5) foot rear yard setback. 15. The Developer shall approved on the land: shall be completed approval. and patio covers shall maintain a side yard setback and ten (10) foot install front yard landscaping as *cape plans. Front yard landscaping for each lot prior to occupancy 16. The Developer shall provide a neighborhood identification monument sign at the northeast corner of Los Angeles Avenue and Flory Avenue that reads "Walnut Acres." The final design and location of the sign shall be approved by the Community Development Director. The sign shall be installed concurrent with perimeter wall installation. 17. Changes to Design: The following changes to the building elevations shall be incorporated by the Applicant and new copies of the building elevations submitted to the Community Development Director for approval prior to issuance of a building permit for any homes: a. Additional window treatment shall be provided on all rear second story windows and on the side second story windows on Lots 1, 11 and 22 subject to the approval of the Community Development Director prior to issuance of a building permit. b. The Plan 3 elevations shall be revised to incorporate design elements and materials similar to Plan 1 and S: \Community Development \Everyone \Resolutions and Conditions \PC 422 conds gpa zc rpd ttm var Colmer rev2.doc Modified: 04/25/02 C. IrNle% .spa ,i .- J RESOLUTION NO. PC- 2002 -422 GPA 2001 -01, TTM No. 5307, RPD No. 2001 -01, VAR 2002 -01 Page 54 Plan 2 elevations. These revised elevations shall be approved by the Community Development Director prior to issuance of a building permit. C. The footprint for Plan 3 on Lots 1 and 22 shall be reversed so that the front entry is located on the side of the unit that faces Flory Avenue. The driveways for Lots 1 and 22 shall remain on "A" Street; however, a gate and pedestrian access walkway shall be added along Flory Avenue. 18. Adjoining residential units may not have the same floor plan or elevation. 19. Compatibility of Changes to Plans: No expansion, alteration or change in architectural elements that are visible from any abutting street shall be allowed, unless in the judgment of the Community Development Director such change is compatible with all dwellings having frontage on the same street and located within 200 feet (or as otherwise determined by the Community Development Director) of the side property line of the structure proposed for expansion or alteration, subject to the review and approval of the Community Development Director consistent with the approved Design Guidelines and Zoning Code requirements. 20. All air conditioning or air exchange equipment shall be placed at ground level, may not be placed in a sideyard setback area within 15 feet of an opening window at ground floor level of any residential structure, and shall not reduce the required sideyards to less than 5 feet of level ground. All air conditioning or air exchange equipment shall be placed in the sideyard setback area where compliance with these standards can be achieved. 21. Modifications to Permit: All facilities and uses other than those specifically requested in the application are prohibited unless an application for a modification is submitted to the Department of Community Development consistent with the requirements of the Zoning Code. 22. Garages shall maintain a clear unobstructed dimension of 20 feet in length and 10 feet in width for each parking stall provided with a minimum of two garage - parking stalls required for each dwelling unit. S: \Community Development \Everyone \Resolutions and Conditions \PC 422 conds gpa zc rpd ttm var A�)N ^ JF1S4_h5 Colmer rev2.doc Modified: 04/25/02 /l%. RESOLUTION NO. PC- 2002 -422 GPA 2001 -01, TTM No. 5307, RPD No. 2001 -01, VAR 2002 -01 Page 55 23. Rain gutters and downspout shall be provided on all sides of the structure for all structures where there is a directional roof flow. Water shall be conveyed to the street or drives in non - corrosive devices as determined by the City Engineer. a. All residential units shall be constructed employing energy saving devices. These devices are to include, but are not limited to the following: Ultra low flush toilets (to not exceed 1.6 gallons); b. Low water use shower controllers as required by Title 24 of the Uniform Building Code shall be placed on all shower facilities; C. Natural gas fueled stoves; ovens and ranges shall not have continuous burning pilot lights; d. All thermostats connected to the main space- heating source shall have night set back features; e. To ensure closure when not in use kitchen ventilation systems shall have automatic dampers; and 24. Hot water solar panel stub -outs shall be provided. 25. Maintenance of Permit Area: The continued maintenance of the permit area and facilities shall be subject to periodic inspection by the City. The permittee or owner shall be required to remedy any defects in ground maintenance, as indicated by the Code Enforcement Officer within five (5) days after notification. 26. Phasing: Construction phasing shall be approved by the Community Development Director. The Director shall avoid to the extent possible any impacts to existing residential areas from construction traffic. 27. Submittal of Construction Drawings: Prior to the issuance of a Zoning Clearance for construction, working drawings, grading and drainage plans, plot plans, final map (if requested by the Community Development Director), sign programs, and landscaping and irrigation plans (three full sets) shall be submitted to the Community Development Director for review and approval. S: \Community Development \Everyone \Resolutions and Conditions \PC 422 conds gpa zc rpd ttm var Colmer rev2.doc Modified: 04/25/02 C RESOLUTION NO. PC- 2002 -422 GPA 2001 -01, TTM No. 5307, RPD No. 2001 -01, VAR 2002 -01 Page 56 28. Citywide Traffic Mitigation Fee: As a condition of the issuance of a building permit for each residential unit within the boundaries of the Tract Map, Developer shall pay City at the time of issuance of a Zoning Clearance for construction, a traffic mitigation fee as described herein ( "Citywide Traffic Fee "). The Citywide Traffic Fee may be expended by City in its sole and unfettered discretion. The amount of the Citywide Traffic Fee shall be $4,240.00 per residential unit. Commencing January 1, 2003, and annually thereafter, the Citywide Traffic Fee shall be increased to reflect the change in the State Highway Bid Price Index for the twelve (12) month period that is reported in the latest issue of the Engineering News Record that is available on December 31 of the preceding year ( "annual indexing "). In the event there is a decrease in the referenced Index for any annual indexing, the Citywide Traffic Fee shall remain at its then current amount until such time as the next subsequent annual indexing which results in an increase. 29. Fish and Game Fee Requirement: Within two (2) days after the City Council adoption of a resolution approving this project, the Applicant shall submit to the City of Moorpark a check for a single fee of $1,250.00 plus a $25.00 filing fee payable to the County of Ventura, to comply with Assembly Bill 3158, for the management and protection of Statewide Fish and Wildlife Trust Resources. Pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21089; and Fish and Game Code Section 711.4; the project is not operative, vested or final until the filing fees are paid. 30. Miscellaneous Fees: Applicant shall pay to the City capital improvement, development, and processing fees at the rate and amount in effect at the time the fee is required to be paid. Said fees shall include but not be limited to Library Facilities Fees, Police Facilities Fees, Fire Facilities Fees, entitlement processing fees, and plan check and permit fees for buildings and public improvements. Further, unless specifically exempted by City Council, Applicant is subject to all fees imposed by City as of the issuance of the first permit for construction and such future fees imposed as determined by City in its sole discretion so long as said fee is imposed on similarly situated properties. 5: \Community Development \Everyone \Resolutions and Conditions \PC 422 conds gpa zc rpd ttm var Colmer rev2.doc Modified: 04/25/02 „� n,_ RESOLUTION NO. PC- 2002 -422 GPA 2001 -01, TTM No. 5307, RPD No. 2001 -01, VAR 2002 -01 Page 57 31. Traffic System Management Plan: Prior to the issuance of a Zoning Clearance for construction for each residential unit, the permittee shall make a contribution to the Moorpark Traffic Systems Management (TSM) Fund of $1,444.00 per residential unit to fund TSM programs or clean -fuel vehicles programs as determined by the City. Commencing on January 1, 2005, and annually thereafter the Air Quality Fee shall be adjusted by any increase in the Consumer Price Index (CPI) until all fees have been paid. The CPI increase shall be determined by using the information provided by the U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, for all urban consumers within the Los Angeles /Anaheim /Riverside metropolitan area during the prior year. The calculation shall be made using the month of December over the prior month of December. In the event there is a decrease in the CPI for any annual indexing, the fee shall remain at its then current amount until such time as the next subsequent annual indexing which results in an increase. 32. Los Angeles Avenue Area of Contribution (AOC) Fee: The applicant shall contribute to the Los Angeles Avenue Area of Contribution (AOC) Fee Program. The Los Angeles Avenue AOC Fee shall be paid in accordance with City Council adopted AOC fee requirements in effect at the time of building permit application. The AOC Fee shall be paid prior to the issuance of Zoning Clearance for each building permit. 33. Park and Recreational Facilities (Quimby) Fee: Prior to approval of Zoning Clearance for residential unit building permit, the subdivider shall pay fees in accordance with Section 8297 -4 of the City's Subdivision Ordinance (Parks and Recreation Facilities). The fee for the three affordable units shall be $4,000 per dwelling unit. The fee for the market rate units shall be determined based on Subdivision Ordinance requirements. 34. Cable Television: During construction, Developer shall allow all persons holding a valid cable television franchise issued by the City of Moorpark ( "Cable Franchisees ") to install any equipment or infrastructure (including conduit, power supplies, and switching equipment) necessary to provide Franchisee's services to S: \Community Development \Everyone \Resolutions and Conditions \PC 422 conds gpa zc rpd ttm var Colmer rev2.doc Modified: 04/25/02 -N 0-�) RESOLUTION NO. PC- 2002 -422 GPA 2001 -01, TTM No. 5307, RPD No. 2001 -01, VAR 2002 -01 Page 58 all parcels and lots in the Project. Developer shall provide notice of its construction schedule to all Cable Franchisees sufficiently in advance of construction to allow the Cable Franchisees to coordinate installation of their equipment and infrastructure with that schedule. City shall provide Developer a list of Cable Franchisees upon Developer's request. 35. In the event the cable television services or their equivalent are provided to the Project or individual lots under collective arrangement or any collective means other than a Cable Franchisee (including, but not limited to, programming provided over a wireless or satellite system contained within the Project), the HOA shall pay monthly to City an access fee of five percent (5%) of gross revenue generated by the provision of those services, or the highest franchise fee required from any City Cable Franchisee, whichever is greater. "Gross revenue" is as defined in Chapter 5.06 of the Moorpark Municipal Code and any successor amendment or supplementary provision thereto. B. CITY ENGINEER CONDITIONS: 36. The City Engineering conditions of approval for Tentative Tract Map No. 5307 apply to Residential Planned Development Permit No. 2001 -01. C. VENTURA COUNTY FIRE DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS: 37. Prior to combustible construction, an all weather access road /driveway suitable for use by a 20 -ton Ventura County Fire Protection District (Fire District) vehicle shall be installed. 38. All access roads /driveways shall have a minimum vertical clearance of 13 feet 6 inches (13'6 "). 39. Approved turnaround areas for fire apparatus shall be provided when dead -end Fire Department access roads /driveways exceed 150 feet. Turnaround areas shall not exceed a 2.5% cross slope in any direction and shall be located within 150 feet of the end of the access road /driveway. 40. Public and private roads shall be named if serving more than four (4) parcels. S: \Community Development \Everyone \Resolutions and Conditions \PC 422 conds gpa zc rpd ttm var Colmer rev2.doc Modified: 04/25/02 RESOLUTION NO. PC- 2002 -422 GPA 2001 -01, TTM No. 5307, RPD No. 2001 -01, VAR 2002 -01 Page 59 41. Prior to recordation of street names, proposed names shall be submitted to the Fire District's Communications Center for review. 42. Street name signs shall be installed in conjunction with the road improvements. The type of sign shall be in accordance with City of Moorpark Road Standards. 43. Address numbers, a minimum of 4 inches high, shall be installed prior to occupancy, shall be of contrasting color to the background, and shall be readily visible at night. Where structures are set back more than 150 feet from the street, larger numbers will be required so that they are distinguishable from the street. In the event, the structure(s) is not visible from the street, the address number(s) shall be posed adjacent to the driveway entrance. 44. A plan shall be submitted to the Fire District for review indicating the method in which buildings are to be identified by address numbers. 45. Prior to construction, the applicant shall submit plans to the Fire District for placement of fire hydrants. On plans, show existing hydrants within 500 feet of the development. Indicate the type of hydrant, number and size of outlets. 46. Fire hydrants shall be installed and in service prior to combustible construction and shall conform to the minimum standards of the City of Moorpark Water Works Manual. 47. Each hydrant shall be a 6 -inch wet barrel design and shall have one (1) 4 inch and one (1) 2 1/2 -inch outlet. 48. The required fire flow shall be achieved at no less than 20psi residual pressure. 49. Fire hydrants shall be spaced 500 feet on center, and so located that no structure will be farther than 250 feet from any one hydrant. 50. Fire hydrants shall be set back from the curb face 24 inches on center. 51. No obstructions, including walls, trees, light and sign posts, meter, and shall be placed within three ( 3 ) feet of any hydrant. S: \Community Development\ Everyone \Resolutions and Conditions \PC 422 conds gpa zc rpd ttm var Colmer rev2.doc Modified: 04/25/02 RESOLUTION NO. PC- 2002 -422 GPA 2001 -01, TTM No. 5307, RPD No. 2001 -01, VAR 2002 -01 Page 60 52. A contract pad shall be installed extending 18 inches out from the fire hydrant. 53. Ground clearance to the lowest operating nut shall be between 18 to 24 inches. 54. Prior to occupancy of any structure, blue reflective hydrant location marketers shall be placed on the access roads in accordance with Fire District standards. If the final asphalt cap is not in place at time of occupancy, hydrant location markers shall still be installed and shall be replaced when the final asphalt cap is completed. 55. Prior to map recordation, the applicant shall provide to the Fire District, verification from the water purveyor that the purveyor can provide the required fire flow of 1,000 gallons per minute at 20 psi. 56. Any structure greater than 5,000 square feet in area and /or 5 miles from a fire station shall be provided with an automatic fire sprinkler system in accordance with current Fire District Ordinance. 57. Plans for all fire sprinkler systems shall be submitted, with payment for plan check, to the Fire District for review and approval prior to installation. 58. Applicant shall submit a phasing plan to the Fire District for review and approval prior to construction. 59. A copy of all recorded maps shall be provided to the Fire Prevention Division within seven (7) days of recordation of said map. D. VENTURA COUNTY WATERWORKS DISTRICT NO. 1 CONDITIONS: 60. Prior to issuance of a building permit, Applicant shall provide Ventura County Waterworks District the following: a. Water and sewer improvement plans in the format required. b. Hydraulic analysis by a registered Civil Engineer to determine the adequacy of the proposed and existing water and sewer lines. C. Copy of approval of fire hydrant locations by County of Ventura Fire Protection District. S: \Community Development \Everyone \Resolutions and Conditions \PC 422 conds gpa zc rpd ttm var Colmer rev2.doc Modified: 04/25/02 RESOLUTION NO. PC- 2002 -422 GPA 2001 -01, TTM No. 5307, RPD No. 2001 -01, VAR 2002 -01 Page 61 d. Copy of Release from Calleguas Municipal Water District. e. Cost estimates for water and sewer improvements. f. Fees: Plan check, construction inspection, capital improvement charge, sewer connection fee and water meter charge. g. Signed Contract to install all improvements and a Surety Bond. E. VENTURA COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT CONDITIONS: 61. No direct storm drain connections to Ventura County Flood Control District facilities will be allowed without appropriate Best Management Practices (BMP's) for compliance with Ventura Countywide Stormwater Program. 62. Cross Connection Control Devices: At the time water service connection is made, cross connection control devices shall be installed on the water system in a manner approved by the County Waterworks District No. 1. F. POLICE DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS: 63. Prior to issuance of building permits for either the residential or recreational components of the project, the Police Department shall review development plans for the incorporation of defensible space concepts to reduce demands on police services. To the degree feasible, public safety planning recommendations shall be incorporated into the project plans. The Applicant shall prepare of list of project features and design components that demonstrate responsiveness to defensible space design concepts. Review and approval by the Police Department of all defensible space design features incorporated into the project shall occur prior to initiation of the building plan check process. G. MOORPARK UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT CONDITION: 64. Prior to issuance of building permits for the residential units, all legally mandated school impact fees applicable at the time of issuance of a building permit shall be paid to the Moorpark Unified School District. S: \Community Development \Everyone \Resolutions and Conditions \PC 422 conds gpa zc rpd ttm var Colmer rev2.doc Modified: 04/25/02 /^ , , A — z RESOLUTION NO. PC- 2002 -422 GPA 2001 -01, TTM No. 5307, RPD No. 2001 -01, VAR 2002 -01 Page 62 H. BUILDING DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS: 65. The final grading plan shall meet all standards of the Uniform Building Code (UBC). 66. Spark Arrestor: An approved spark arrestor shall be installed on the chimney of any structure(s). I. MITIGATION MEASURE CONDITIONS: 67. Prior to submittal of building plans, Applicant shall provide an acoustical study report to the City of Moorpark that outlines a program for implementation of the Noise Element Standard of 65 CNEL (Community Noise Equivalent Level) to be attained at all locations within the development. The City also requires that interior noise levels attributable to exterior noise sources not exceed 45 CNEL. The intent of the interior noise level criterion is to provide an acceptable noise level for communication and sleep. 68. A sound wall shall be constructed along the southern property line of Lots 1 through 11, along Los Angeles Avenue. The top of the sound wall must be 9.5 feet above the centerline surface of Los Angeles Avenue for Lots 1 and 2, 10.5 feet above the centerline for Lots 3 to 9 and 11.5 feet above the centerline for Lots 10 and 11. 69. The sound wall shall extend at least 20 feet to the north on the west side of Lot 1 and at least 20 feet on the east side of Lot 11. These extensions would then transition gradually in height down to a standard 6 -foot high wall height. 70. To reduce the interior noise levels, a minimum window glass thickness of 3/16 -inch and a standard exterior wall of 5/8- inch gypsum board, 3.5 -inch fiberglass filled cavity, 7/8- inch latch and stucco, typical for single family residential developments shall be installed. 71. All second story windows along Los Angeles Avenue shall be Milgard type 5120 double glazed window assemblies or an equivalent with a minimum STC 33 rating. S: \Community Development \Everyone \Resolutions and Conditions \PC 422 conds gpa zc rpd ttm var Colmer rev2.doc Modified: 04/25/02 �"'' A nr`j RESOLUTION NO. PC- 2002 -422 GPA 2001 -01, TTM No. 5307, RPD No. 2001 -01, VAR 2002 -01 Page 63 72. All rear and side entry doors of the homes on Lots 1 through 11 shall be gasketed (jamb, head, sill) with interlocking or tube -type compression weather - stripping, or an effective equivalent. MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM MONITORING AND REPORTING REQUIREMENT FOR NOISE MITIGATION MEASURES: Prior to issuance of a building permit, the Building and Safety Office will provide a memorandum to the Community Development Director verifying that the building permit plans comply with all noise mitigation measures imposed as conditions of approval. S: \Community Development \Everyone \Resolutions and Conditions \PC 422 conds gpa zc rpd ttm var Colmer rev2.doc Modified: 04/25/02 �*� z __z iFLORYAVENUE '4 `MILLARDSTREET TYpCAL STREET SECTIONS TYPICAL STREET SECTION. � .M20[v[t.iMn•r•Ti•trAtPtI F[nPOOM U . Sill Y•.T CJYNN MT [. l UTO— � 1 11' RPI2TD M[M•M �O[Ut N O2W 1t n, ?L ioT AREA TAtuunon LOX NO MLA 15Q.FT.1 j gut Hn 1 Hit 1 ) 11 1 Jm HN Hi. 11 TC5 ' 2t J O 1 Jn 11 )ut )ae 1, Hl[ HE Ni HN Hee SECTION A•A LOS ANGELES AVENUE TYPICAL STREET SECTION I- raaECTsrrw, I ' �r'. M. AYL "l.JtAlnetMr RTft[tTtr TTtO110ML. OTaV a'OOTIIA ��1 �(jtHS. wA, — r7FItR1�AP0.MtTtR�.V 510— �� M Il_. —JIO.. -tar Allat++:,vt.: A,L .'STIREET � � .� Miliurvr• SCALE I l0 A;OCATOf1:'+1AP FIORIi 1 V[nT CAL nTa; TYPICALSTRZx 49ST10[!: SECTION Q'B t[ rXLt«�cp r tR E MtottPi �l/10l�EDSf�pAP R5CHOOL a 4RNY alr i'otoi uo I. 6 , L,':pR'�at",RbC1�. ".' t - .. 5 r .� • I y , b uN1TJl.,'sic�.opglnt�fa°O x I y prhit:♦atPY � � :.� h � _ _ _ ='3 — _ _ _ _ ♦ I 'w ',S � � • 56 f�.• I 14 '•Rt•. s5 ca c :., rl 1 asse� i r LZ'r�� lI I I , S` ;a5, = 19< •�, �2 � � I t LI 1 1 Q. .1 _ - 1_NlwOitFRM►MtM— �. �"- —_- Ss "1 .._. .*_ �`'!- fi�i�i'' _- .�'Lt.'r'PaL[c�r'str,.ac:T"♦' Y.: T �--- •,:2.2>����r �,r� ; t1f� 1 I J i . Lkc Ir •," r o- .tc I� )•! .i b q F ( �f _. LB ,! 'g �` ',.t .. i i I v.lf.. tGEi+BpALNOTEi': •.. I � T�TL� *-< �� '_ � / tll';; 'i - •�: I I:aOSR ARIA IN:[H 5V•r2. . 2.1.1 'Afl:.'.. 7i%'M�42YLI1.± ..�y AAFA OF LOT! NS.YSf'iMLN.{WtCR.I .. I -1_ a, ... L.A. ,W. WOPJONO 3,750 4/': rf.. r . n .. ,,:.: _. .-•" - _ _ _ _ V � r}- XT.r,f1.:' f Aks:ro.';,,> 'r. R�., wry•, °3� 'Ri.- � ..�.. LIB t':1�1 1�1_wwN l 1- i tri YCb 011, J r r ? ^r r r fy11W0� '�° C ,7. r #.,,1 ,.eT•i:�9 s w �1:� i, J � � �'!�T, F �. Tx?! �, £ ys a ���� 11. AfTRLLT '—.TO IbmFoR GCt'IDT. , .. 01. s i T + )//at6T f Y yJ Ct J�yNMIiU�'�T ', LATtA. 0 TAtp MITII t1fACYLOGAT1oN T0 tt OtTRfl+IprD , � -. .. ... .... PA 'K" ' ."�'�Ml� •.... .. "Ey+fi, t ,n.A ».,,.e ,.. r....o ............. n.,,,....'A ,,,.» � ��. $ a' {,♦'7an... :. :. r � tNi , tT tt ..; - . _ -X. _ _ __ '— ___— r .�, y LJ a M �'3,a°i'e+l •s, ' -iLJ �K ��m ?.i 3� } 7 • tr rt c :: > � s,a, �y y ' t:�; . � +k . `� y -_.. _- ___ —__... _ —_.. —. 5 E.:�7Fr t �htlft5?Ffy�' $'�J' .MJ. ,♦� Y Lx v r..a' -:. ,kyJC 1'' �.''�� J -;�.. frt+�): r � :. ii'r r;�. , ATTACHMENT3A. A n: IL .36 c _C, Cnom 4 mcnori 13-B Li- ------ r J stcn&4 D� L > -0 < CC FLAN, 4 it, PLAN 1A A. PA. u,.c PLA,?! 4 -4- :A a .PLAN PA. 111, FAI FAj A. 14 % -A .14 \J 71 U L STRUT -7 f I;x 101/ .451 A A L Is PLA �rL" 2A 0 IA. -.1 r f1 P Ir A PLAN le), 4_0-. -A 7 3� LA OSCAft L A�Pi A 1H AVk., LO M NGEIES - .. .. .. - ---- e ------- ------- -- ----------- ----------------- 7 N(_ -ILO -4, LEG -A" STREE 0 r� fpm 3 4 LOCA"on ALAI 11 Rlft 1r, C11A11m'Aiiwm t 1LA141 I ..ftur,­ 1_ 4 ,I[W"w tV - ..ms~ - axm_� w mhwx..- .bo Muruww b,YMOt,NUwORAwMOw, Aare, H� :AA 3 r� fpm 3 4 LOCA"on ALAI 1LA141 I ILA" I -A-! wWor SECTION. AA, _dA PLOT Pf AN L` COWIR ftnLOYMun Co� "VARXWAYCALAWAS..� INC. v CAIA.AAAS CA. 9CM. r� fpm 5-4 p - PROJECT SITE x —� fID[W4k g 9 y1• L �+ � -- � It I em[wAU R�,1 IS I I ]t� SIO— _c.orA s c �—'___ -_ y..r' g � . �_�-- __ -•cumR '� safwASN R[uwlNG wiu / y eI¢.MAx A_r. AStMrvr rD•LUCTaIC T[u.RNN "[ c •L[n.u.umrt rn[n IAGIIR G.A[ SCAR 1'x•10 PLORY AVENUE. - MILLARU STREET SECTION F'F _ _,__,_ [ Wr. NDaNUrAwwAtD[M[na SECTION Q -B -�y .NCava.ra TYPICAL STREET SECTION, TYPICAL STREET SECTION "A5f STREET W y ..S LOCATION MAP TYPICAL STREET SECTION n r : uii NTS -- • G — �� ' �_- I' 3• wOMl�r gmmw W '•'I 1 >' I Jij •a - / x0101 wALLd A•NP1110N ... - 1 "I F2r . i_ 1 n nM-IY— O MIDI +n I ir�_awiir'r " _� . e" °Y la F wN e .D,,. n IDO w J � aqPT ILAIN O YM. • IOr '.. I � I / I 'III,'., '. I E �1c., ° �° i ,. T ® I:, ir6"zi Sy gg S 8 : i _ Z �I FR p LDT4 gf tXt.. Ii I I � 'I l im K ii Dour •NTro [ Cg 8 . - 1 _ �; 3r I p I Mill I MOQ RPARk LEMN tlkli FARM SCHOOL SECTON A-A RY SCHOOL L LOS ANGELES AVENUE u Y , l 1 _ It k. IYPICALJ'TREETSECTION I r o[ as sNr : A E �_ yI( k w LOT Ii � sd ' w _ - 1IT. -T R s'''�"f Tc° I 10 [ se VND :tn,:MFL j nan,ln sni 1 r. .1:.1 1 ,r• 1 5�1 °� �Iw �I ... T T „6 Ma .. `, 1 I� •; I ''�� 1[..[ �� k �. O'1r 22 20 14 for 12 ri �`r. a r 21+" r , 19 1185 i 13 y 111 G'. II`1 17 16 1 a r.r w�.'. r V' I ;, � .;: � 1 't-nl s �rt -t(rM111i Ttitiyri • y c -... a -atrn_ 1 a .+ r s x I, N it N'.uttT„ N ' I ggg n _ 1•wtNY YtrAwnp WAW1 S961014 S961014 C-C'. i V `r�l - IOrr _ '� ' ey0Rr 0I w•WYARP•1.0r 1 N.il.' } � S/ TD AD AIaM [rARfRDP[Rn Lr'• I! YN.a° la I — "- Wj'`{ '- r}{i ��; I t [CT. noT.naM ?. � y- [r-- ^-eA -• a- r-- �inrT6 -TTF�A+TP 1'R —� �� - Sg LION &Ec 'N s 1901 I 0. ,; 1 a 1 1....f Ie [191.5 FL JIL• .,p f1 [l N! 1 / y� j I• i0 AMP• [ � It .r • i' n wr4+� g xr. IRA C a a 1J- � I• I uqq;l - I r CI t. :. y SDI b f C1 F. L. �. DrcA i J 3 6 7 8 Ir.•'SECTION D-D I _ I n l� y [ 4 r e5 A } ;n e F d �:t L'1 i +r y 1Ln.r i.a 4i%! P SJain.a YYY 1 r CENERALNOTES: N.TS... I l : 1 ! ,. ) aaf '• IN .. - ` + aD 1 I ._...._WAP_T °_�rrtvcr- i �- _ - -- I. GROSS AREA - IN,19550.7. .1..•I ACS. _ _ ___ __ -� 'q.a A _: -: t �i 1L9RTIRAI'•GATDATT - _. •[n'lDODNa4M AN9AUF LOTS - 19,nT �- "A•STXEET AREA - 22.1.1 ! i ,30 y..D / MMN IrkAr tOrwx nT.. •�11 I i� 1� I.. A. AVE. WFDENMO- 1.116 NOTI, ALLIT•ADIAC[Ni [TR[tl DtDICATION - - —' _ 1G rnLAAEA Iw "' A "A -AMa II. ADDTUNAL 50a 1.T '.. ,.`_ 5�- " �ED71XCTTy _ w.�„�� s o•�— 3�f"- _ _ _ _ 1. LOTAIII..S SECIATARCATAIULATIORMCON - - -"-- '- -- - _ _ ANGELES AVE. J. L=TING ZONING: R4, PROroSLD ZONING; RPp \. yVP - - .I c6RLYAL N07ES: 'GRAdNG ORDER NO. lM11fa DARpJnNIL. LAtiVW6 {IL .e ,•AY Wh - -r �fN .. ALL PNOFO•LD DPILN /IONS AM [MOWN HEREON. 506 5. PR /.LMINARY TRLEIILPORt PRVARLp rY LAWYERS TfTLI CO. L ALL FROPDYp RpIOVF•mRiRAgWxRDCMRALL - rrpPSwaYA1Pw [an to oANDt/r lawlocla ...:. 1 TENTATiVET AICYJ�— -`rte —_ SOUTR[RN CALIIORMM RDIIOX W[M[Nffi u•xr•,vxv, ru[,.fa n r.Ma•b. 1roc.r. -- '" NO.SUJ SINGLE UTILITY COMPANIES FNfiffir SR d' AND e'X 15'EAe[MINT[PIA ORm 16055, e•[AIMENT LOCATED r4M0rle••NMfAw CYM 1405..• _ _ --- FAMILY DETACHED •' W'LY DFIn.Y,DRY. FIX OR —it.,. rrrL•AYaO[rRRWa � } ay_ ' -- TRACTN0.3537 -3 FAMILY DETAC rillL[TV NI[,OI DE /lLpMCM WN51tT.wTa,WG. tWTW.c[ �IDa��r�({• ,: .. r "' MMR 107 V[NoRi at .�AEE Ep.p nafEf A TOPOGMPBIC rVIIVLY PRCFARCD BY DIGITAL MAPPING. INC Mp1�'101101'a .,,_^" .. _. +.. .... ....__...- .... .. TELLP n0A0W nm vA .G -[Mar SDru[.roat ILIn.' I MAN AriN: JWEFNto1y1 FROM AEMAL IMOTOGR "DATID Till• - + -.... _MULTI - FAMILY UNITS L. .:•car•ruWUrl•s ANr.tD Ern ,_.. ._ ....- XaD •ao-Ma. 1. AINUFORI PARCXL NO., PORTION OF 511.116 l' PWIPa1pN TOGRADi AIOIIG N'LYrWY.A QORAW[0. ) I {[GIRT, g CALIFORNIA CD: OW G I. ALL PROPO I/D WPROVCMCH'M& VNFRATTRUCNRE ARI x1010P .RA1oCe0IYCYFLLFARmn"MGRLL•WPPLK l.i T�'*M���./J�(�r������� �_..u:.un.. ._.. 140R MA•Ta[[.[M+SN °j- SEanC DEM[NTrn INION FULwD1ARY Arm SUIULCT TO CHANGE IN DEIGN. •�•LL FpTtIp1A/lY OAT/p •R40L : ' t I A,•../i�L.i iv�ia .' � ' OAR: yRCp XaADIVI` L t a. ..9 GRADING •URAINAO / CO."MAL PLANS row GRADING, c A ai@'°'° ^'°"°R°'' ""°'r•r't°''I5c1°° I li. [ Nn EARTRWOM OVANrfrp• AND DRAINAGE DCVICLa •LM0• ®' - I - 1[DN ywjM G 'aaMO �r'h'V eni•fra t. IR.ORAIaAOC CON[PIIIAL FLLIr roaFrwAarriMlcu - 1 eEweS. v �Nw.counY TsNwDAa ooT I 11. ALL 1 06TIN0 STRUCNRtI ,PAVING, /ACDSTIa, ETC. TO rL 1 t �1� `al'r� 15MWNftI :VON POAD RCMOV[D. NOTE. �•rrNUfarN R[ronvrl AW.1[v. fINfA11r[ �WAt[R A wNArr[AV ArN aarou 1'217 IfC.AL D_ Sr'n� IPnO::: - MooRFARrL CA non OWNER AIFROIDU16Yfl1 A. Ww0. I[,LL Mrrlov[MrXT . ! •• • ^•' ^n r,r , OFMOit OIr..CGM1ANDrAKMRA.LTrVAO CAL,INTIR CITY 1•ep AAwM. MOORIM In[DK000LOmfM[T 11. ASTR/.ET iREL TO $I. PNOVNEO FOR EACH LOT. LOCATION WII.1. - FIANI WpL ILryMARANF DPOCIAM.ItA OF MOORPARF:,COVNTY OF VANTVRA STATC OI C.U.DORNW, ORPAAn.. . TMEPNOME: PACrt rnL MDO•IA•rLCA.nNI "E IN FRONT YARD WITH EXACT LOCATION TO BE U[TCRMIMFD - - - - MAPNWO'Of iAOpVARR rURDNTEION ,RAN[RO SPIT. Erb WARp."I 1x> IMD+•.1r `A'E CONCEPTUAL GRADING PLAN! M.R U. 1, PG. IA O /flCbLRLC011M. .ep aA LEV,GnoM I[D17 40YIMa 1ne1x .ha •Ornsp 555...5 rwr . w..1r.+ SN[[T TITLE CITY OF MOORPARK - SHEET. NO •r.W wvn40 .. an.., nri -• +5r, i+ ibr Lr COLMER DLVELOPMENT CO. & D V ILL ENCTi'IEER1i'iC/ Ff!'l A "WpA.RMWAYCALASASAS &DEVELOPHIENT ,M,TE „5 TENTATIVE TRACT NO 5307 COr1svLTANrs,nac, CALADASASCA.91392 FOR SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL PURPOSE PLANr^NO • ENGINraRINO • D /YILOFMENT . / rua MDRna[ar.roDLMRtuswlr .ram f>r•w lop 3 WEETr ATTACHMENT 3 C.' ' Sr..M«w '. DI >I✓ >l1w AbA fYGPIrF J N — ! I i�'�i•cr -r. -'t P. _n.# r iLLQl 'A:�10.1i i BROJECT9R4 t§L- TYA'AT PLAN ) . •, �.,A,,, SECT.A•A IYP11 A PMN Mr. • . tnRM • ,•M.1. nxcn2 72,10- • SECT uP�e,� ld7 l�R.����{��' 9. —ta ANCr1Ae•n • •• SECT ION Q'B "oRrz.Lva rcAa. .0 nuvr�ron.srn p. T D Ab .. \ rr r. se K c r "A" STREET M1.F • [• 1 I I L_ A.. 7N T.M N. r,R RMR L• _ _ _ _• J . ) c bIME >In. !. D. Anon Ma TYPICAL SIRE SECTION UC C $ B Ma • - P :F? ,T•L1 •yam /C cr _!L NeP A TPnn PB '1 rrP.i1LT.1070)tA /NA A..., t Mpnfm.DeX. �s� Ndr 7v sc*Lr rrMrranw✓1 :n `T n�:: f ` I r I; 1 ! ' I I - � 5 .. I I. r•.v °'�- _ s -may for 4 A- I I I'' I II i i _.. .. y) •'. J :'.,/ .•n W n r .. PSeP. YA A'CP I - .I •1 1 �/ v } i1 . .. ,gill �. a�rfrLJf... SP.HN S'•0.11 g yy rE c ■ n ® I I MOQRPARK UNION EI.Fh{ENO'AA SCROOL I _7 "_15_ I.lr 1IWWWW . a � ` • ' 9„ --a Lot > � %t _ _. D •II $ E C. �T.jAl -. - M I ? 5I 1 yy ' a � � __E� O - � Ph \ P • I f � 1 f . l C � J O �I e7 t iI I l o iF I I 1 k dro 11 �(1 ,w n/ R ,•/Lh, , I► ' G t J RRIUI B LM - D'� c, 1r. tT� '. e j V [ Ii 1 .' E �i Y.. 7 h $ p { . a+v l 11`4I �0 �ARY)) SEC y I , t OOf M I L LOS ANGELES A VENUE TYPICAL STREET SECTION J I 1 I~ C \ 1 1 AI I �}I tt��� lr< 5z a; T N.=. n.MRrt MIA ire gpE 22 1 7 16 IS 1 I 11 13 1 1 �- ... a '.fa Y � gig E :.. rypDel oAI 1yQi n.NUO est•aMC "ul� 81�na »X — 1 -- YII(:.Tp1.•4'I•rM100N N•• n >)1 r Lc)', r I j O r � Jl aIr' f +r.A.o•1.Y,eu•.nD..mLM{ A. e>t rr •A(/'-^^ t . A En naT n•✓ Peen. I i 1•r f �a _1+ Y '•�S - s G A>a TAlL wI •�A ��r. 1 T �'• ! 11 •!:" f510h w L �Ij. _ SECTION EE {1J -= ,N.TS ' I I 1 A.r,. 1 a rr[.t {I. Er[f [• )N+ t•TE r1 .aB kS S 3N 1. fps TCAIir I• In 1 Oel I C HY�R0006 /C GUTA a '.- n ail rcm A 11.��, D r d ep SwFA.A t y MS.R1 /A A'Ai Lwe. , XPDES 610 %Mr[A _ •'. A 3A " `CN of I'.Ii R a.r +r.✓ A.rw L., T1 AN. I Et} �r :�. L�, RAF✓ to ZewV -K I i '/ •. 3' 9 )) 1 er! S.va NVna.R • 7 AA Ar CY Lr+ .� S S ' 10 ' 2 3 S 6 7 n If. A[sa uedc so Y <. (rYnr) ,1 B yt A s r PfE A'RE a'e EAGY' 'k RSh t 1 f L t f f t o 1. !n! t ' F f s E.. aF r S-tA•or Qf. Na. .). i. t. n{ 'I AT w9S r. r. 4RA B J .)... .r I r �. QEN fat ). s6uf Dtr•n PBFYf t A f 5 5 a ) rn n A[' { TISCI}StET I/ - �' s (nR r1v BB1 -or GLNERAL NOTES: F1NM 2.✓.. -C :: 1_ i• J . f I• • .. .. .nr _ r+.. - r -. �'•saa'rr.� T -ol -e4 1. GRON ARIA + IM,TN EO.». • l.Nl ACE. --- a• If _.. ♦ .. r1[NCiRt„"IL ,- T_ ARFA OF LOTS - Mop, i . VIDDIDNI ) - •A•R1L 1115 LA - . — — AE >E MOTE. AL.tMNTnE _N,ANM TOTAR- S,5 .. AILL•.1Mlar. ADOQIORAL 1oe.Jr .. 9• ✓.. '- L�- T[*AOr� leo.__._ -ti..° _. .,,-- .�-, -• -- 1. LOT Aftw $at LOT AREA I;A TION RERLOn AM axa_ -s r_ A E1Oa1MO l[Mp{Gr R -11 PROPOSED 7DNOIGI RFD .. ANGEL>SS GENLRALNOTES: GRADING - —r- 1 ALL PROPOSED DM{NLIONE ARE 8110" 011LON. .16 10t A FII[IAIMARYTRIl REPORT FE[FAALO AT I:AtrY11311ruco. 1 MlraOFMIm O[rROrrlVMa•DpaAT[ROLTVY •M �..: •> ..__ •.� �`�� ,._ DAD[R XO. ]aa1NA DA7[D }Va.l LAA[MlMI E, II'xa ", t 'xll', f"aut D"rt�1.u�.D. Ur A.MoO . oaNM1 Yn•D[aYR..4.>1.° a1 Tf.MRA.NNO.x . E.1 a tM{ AL paE1CR afM).Oi .t 1 ' - .. .. #-• .. . -- I I . ___ - - 1r,1 TOE ON . D SO)AMJTR] I1VYEM�mL ► c TLil �rCA14I.TJ+Y T� Y , -_ CVMOIAAUPtA�NN I"y E LB L tAR i9WOR �01•NfTLT WtTR[RN CALIFORNIA EDWIN M11NMr Y [AfMaNT LOCATEn AFm x 1] LAaW [Mn KA Oa 1• M•LY OF MY Day. RR OR eaMl)M. TRACTNO.3537 -3 TACKS li LarMr O" ��1Ct OU_ f pIyP. IN NYFEXFS R! /cs xtYa. WO. Ort nex I.•Neet'iM•1rrx. L L.' , FIMR1EM Elm xOADJ [rpOlj%OFMf.G ANf I, FROM AIAFAL aUAVEYFRAFARAT90 DVLMI. AVFMC .plc ,mu a.wf urn - MULTI - FAMILY UNITS .•.. -.— NawAUI`NEI11M.a1eOm TTIF JCaFrlrfp)fl FROM AAAW.nmocAAFtY pwnD NLEI. 5 Au nn•mLEIOnA p•Xr.TOn leEEl fV>I NOR anwl t. AESfYOAf FAACAL MD.1 roRTON OFIII -11a - atOMr /1oR TDfYAe •Ii1IW N'LY FaRr.mnOrtA01aD. �. !1 11 1111 10 INO• '.q0' �F ONNE gtIBDIVIDER w /SEE. L ALL FROMSED DMOVEMEMTA A MIRARTRUCTIM AA[ STOMGRA)RIC tIRV[Y IR[tARIDt1 DIGfl•I. MAnPO, L.C. :i _ - (aeq fM W H1 rntM RMYIIA1MeNr co. FLIELDAM•AY AND MRCr TO CRANOL M FMAL DaSI01r. TROM AMrYLmoltlERA1aY D•nDlwNt. \J 1 I(' �. 1^ _ pW G sM rAU.r.at tAUa•fu /. B[L GRADMO A DRADrAG[ COMCFJ7UAL FLANS FOR GRADING. 1•u aanmrc R>RfrcTnM lAVpc. I.•[Wirr), FTC. TeK u . I II(�III (.I .I:. rI. RO.ROR aL Galliaa �a�tRf cotraa Nflml.fM1 - L ART.I. °RKgUANTrrL%A"MIAMAGEDKVKI . �_ :I Y �PRMNAGE',. CO NCEPT MUCTURAX, PAVING, FACRlfaA, [TC TOR f W04FRO CONCaIR IMAE FOR RRfa•Oa D[YMrt rt � _ NYwR.. tf"wAWRCAMION IINO NE gR.rol RWOVfO. NOTLI .•En[Ra1r,EAYR[.w•Y•OR. nMt•TM �. �rMTNF. ra MD.n.rraut>.•>a "[v.D• LEGAL nt•A E��v[znr.::: uooRrwcG.r: OWNER AIrf0.D1ATRY LD rt.1D.'> +INtRAMrOVtM>X> ,, +r r , HIRTIONS OF BLOCK U M•Wa AND RARE, WTWCM RAN a.. .-a— •vMODS —1 OfRLRICt IL AMEET SABA TO AL PROVIDED FOR EACX LOT• LOCATION WILL MYRMLMD[IUn ANrMOT1•Mt Ra OF MOORPARK. CDVMTY OF YAMI STATA 0I CALDOwIh taLahl0lll °.yq01Ll NOp•>•ex -CA p1[I IE IM FRONT YARD NITR IOACTLOCATION TO A[ DETERMINED M.Vmo•'O' OEIAOORFARR IVAMYAIIOMiRANC710 BDrp•- Mf WANDAV/- lal.1E/ law"' a, `"TER CONCEPTUAL (TRADING PLAN """"" " °"'°"'"�'°� E.R`N,A>•G.MM INR w«M.1EI.EM. FIAT yr ✓u I✓ r "• Irvr•un I......A I . "tiro •• IT L"u� - EMEET TITLE CITY OF MOORPARK SKYVIEW ENG:TFJ U+G S R M"142 SHEET •Y, rrrxrr .. I..11ct 1a.x Let r✓ rlr.r 5 COLMLI DEYELOFM[Kr CO. , N /IHa Ara RTnfrn SIN PARKWAY CALB"AS �DEVELOPM6Ni IDa1 SUITEIIE 'TENTATIVE TRACT NOS. 5307. CONSUMNI'S,U +a .L, AA CALAWA6CAflfl7 FOR SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL PURPOSE rLAMMMO enclMAeama REVALOFM[Mr �I T. .Da MDM enarwMrAaeuDMl IMn m..or a s wean ATTACHMENT3•1). PLAN 2 rL.r+iv 11 1856 SQ.FT. 1659 SQ.FT. SCALE 1/4 " =1' -0" F L O R Y A V E N U E Lu m z w COLMER DEVELOPMENT BASSENIAN LAGONI ARCHITECTS 01 -28-02 l 4' ,l pa i# i i i ROOF NEW. L---- --------------- - - - - -- 667 SO. FT. SECOND FLOOR PLAN SCALE 1/4' = V-O" FIRST FLOOR PLAN SCALE 1/4' - 1' -0" PLAN 3 SOVAREFOOTAGE FIRST FLOOR 485 SO. FT. SECOND FLOOR 657 SO. FT. TOTAL 1150 S0. FT. GARAGE 450 SO. FT. I N LIJ Z m O Q W Im 1 W. Q O u W Q pYC W O O u 2 Arr All rs�nrr.lnt Itll(p 4RynAw Y }jl 3w Ann G R]Kl FAXf1111 M1.p11 N. 03 -3oa3 I Of 33'A" Ir - F - - - - - - -- FIRST FLOOR PLAN SCALE 1/4' - 1' -0" PLAN 3 SOVAREFOOTAGE FIRST FLOOR 485 SO. FT. SECOND FLOOR 657 SO. FT. TOTAL 1150 S0. FT. GARAGE 450 SO. FT. I N LIJ Z m O Q W Im 1 W. Q O u W Q pYC W O O u 2 Arr All rs�nrr.lnt Itll(p 4RynAw Y }jl 3w Ann G R]Kl FAXf1111 M1.p11 N. 03 -3oa3 I Of E L E V A T I O N S SCALE 1/4 " =1' -O" F L O R Y A V E N U E COLMER DEVELOPMENT BASSENIAN LAGONI ARCHITECTS of -ae-0z LFGEND I.'S' III .E B FLAA III .E C'. STUCCO cDR IICI. D. DECOPAn%F X E`:I E S1lK'CD F. STONE G SE0o,,L G -il, wr UIk�R H. COPPER ROOD I. N'DOD SNU. l R 1. WOOD POr%HFLF K. DECOR. {TIFF TILF L WROLf NTIRO1 !.i. 1-INYL 11111) N. N, ET,NL %EN'T L� Z LU F i UP PI-AN I SPANISH ------------- PLAN 2 SPANISH SCALE 1/8--l'-O- E L E V A T 1 0 N S F L 0 R Y A V E N U E COLMER DEVELOPMENT BASSENIAN LAGONT ARCHITECTS -21zm- 7112, b- 8 ArrAllASIw.A, l.< IY, LA II �1. ■MI��II �1 ^Fli�i■. 1�1 ■w���� ■�wt� - - -. .Iwn..1■I ■n t �. � `� x,111�1 .1� �1��.�111� ■I�.���t����w�� ._r_ wlt�n■�weu. -sue �Irr�l� �l��rl��_� \I�r�l����_���In�.1 � � �, � wr �mon��n.•� ��j�� -��.� �_ p■�■�wl■■n�� �ni..u�awww.. - ��� E. LEGEND LEF-T-SIDF— ELEVATION A. S. . • ...- C. STUCCO D. E. ... F. ... POTSHELF DECORATIVE G. H. WROUGHT IRON J. METAL VENT K. STUCCO TRIM RIGHT 2101 ELEVATION REARIH."ATION EXISTING RESIDENTIAL FRONT YARD PRIVATE MAINTENANCE AREAS A, y A Q 0: 0 h/ LIMITS OF MAINTENANCE - ASSESSMENT DISTRICT EVERGREEN ACCENT TREES, E.G. STRAWBERRY TREE, RHAPHIOLEPIS 'MAJESTIC BEAUTY', SWEETSHADE, ETC. 0 m 5aler bogus daalgm jn1#capa architecture 6 planning ee N�wMrlk�u,y,,,M 71 /a eN A+er,w.�WN� M, C�alerMr r]eH :.. "A "STREET LOS ANGELES AVENUE DECIDUOUS FRONT YARD LANDSCAPE TREE, E.G. ALDER, POPLAR, SYCAMORE FLOWERING EVERGREEN FOUNDATION SHRUBS AND PERENNIALS, E.G. INDIA HAWTHORN, ROCKROSE, PITTOSPORUM, LILY-OF-THE-MILE, DAY LILIES, NEW ZEALAND FLAX, KANGAROO PAW / TURF AREAS PROVIDE NPDES DETENTION IN FRONT YARDS PER CIVIL ENGINEER 9.J-a.5' HEIGHT LOS ANGELES AVENUE,- - V HEIGHT FLORY AVENUE SPLIT-FACE MASONRY BLOCK WALL, COLOR TO BE BEIGE WITH A DARK BROWN TOP COURSE AND PERIODIC ACCENT BLOCKS S'-S" TO S' HEIGHT SIDE YARD TO BE SOLID BEIGE COLOR REAR YARDS NOT A PART LOS ANGELES AVENUEIFLORY AVENUE TYPICAL WALL ELEVATION aacr: r•rr • VINYL GATE. POSTS AND HARDWARE PER MANUFACTURER j L i 1--------- -- = - -- -- -- 1 OPTIONAL VINYL GATE ELEVATION TRACT 5307 © MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA COLMER DEVELOPMENT COMPAAY T. 5000 Parkway Calabasas, Suite 1 10 eu e: W TYPICAL FRONT YARD LANDSCAPING Calabasas, Califomia 91302 RESOLUTION NO. 2002- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT (GPA) NO. 2001 -01 TO CHANGE THE LAND USE DESIGNATION FROM S (SCHOOLS) TO VH (VERY HIGH DENSITY) ON ONE PARCEL (APN 512 -0- 110 -112) TOTALING APPROXIMATELY 2.44 GROSS ACRES OF LAND LOCATED ON THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF LOS ANGELES AVENUE AND FLORY STREET, ON THE APPLICATION OF COLMER DEVELOPMENT COMPANY WHEREAS, at a duly noticed public hearing on May 1, 2002, the City Council considered General Plan Amendment No. 2001 -01 filed by Colmer Development Company, for a change in the Land Use Designation of the Land Use Element of the General Plan from S (Schools) to VH (Very High Density) on approximately 2.44 gross acres of land located on the northeast corner of Los Angeles Avenue and Flory Street; and WHEREAS, at its meeting of May 1, 2002, the City Council opened the public hearing and took public testimony and closed the public hearing; and WHEREAS, the City Council, after review and consideration of the information contained in the City Council staff report, and testimony received, reached a decision on this matter on May 1, 2002. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. The City Council does hereby find that General Plan Amendment No. 2001 -01 is consistent with the goals and policies of the City of Moorpark General Plan. SECTION 2. That the City Council adopts the following California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) findings: 1. That the Mitigated Negative Declaration prepared for the Colmer Development Company project serves as the environmental document for the General Plan Amendment No. 2001 -01. ATTACHMENT 4 S: \Community Development \Everyone \Resolutions and Conditions \cc 020501 reso gpa colmerl.doc Resolution No. 2002 - Colmer GPA 2001 -01 Page 2 2. In order to reduce the potential adverse impacts of this project, mitigation measures discussed in the Mitigated Negative Declaration have been incorporated and shall apply to General Plan Amendment No. 2001 -01. 3. A Mitigation Reporting and Monitoring Program prepared in compliance with Assembly Bill 3180 and considered in the various decisions regarding these projects applies to General Plan Amendment 2001 -01. SECTION 3. That the City Council hereby approves General Plan Amendment No. 2001 -01 for a change in Land Use Designation from S (Schools) to VH (Very High Density Residential) as further described in Exhibit A. SECTION 4. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this resolution and shall cause a certified resolution to be filed in the book of original resolutions. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 1St day of May, 2002. Patrick Hunter, Mayor ATTEST: Deborah S. Traffenstedt, City Clerk Exhibit A: General Plan Exhibit Map GENERAL PLAN EXHIBIT MAP I AVE � u � M u►SSFH AV �Jk) ANc,ElES) Cp itT ST 'A elf sa c 1 S t -3RD StiA) si o at —QAW S1;A. N%p < MCA'( } _CLDl. 0 DCPCJTHY A oc , (RUTH 2ND ST. I r AH n I FU f ( SUSM Al& I ' tWAERT!5� 7i ESTHEP SNE1J4!N A r� HWY. ItVE. 1 w, i k 25 AVE t0 VH W 7s , �— MA JESM. �A '— cl Y NORTH EXHIBIT A I z c.. i ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING ZONE CHANGE (ZC) NO. 2001 -01 TO CHANGE THE ZONING DESIGNATION FROM R -2 (TWO FAMILY RESIDENTIAL) TO RPD (RESIDENTIAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT) 9 DWELLING UNITS/ACRE ON ONE PARCEL (APN 512 -0- 110 -112) TOTALING APPROXIMATELY 2.44 GROSS ACRES OF LAND LOCATED ON THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF LOS ANGELES AVENUE AND FLORY STREET, ON THE APPLICATION OF COLMER DEVELOPMENT COMPANY WHEREAS, at a duly noticed public hearing on May 1, 2002, the City Council considered the application filed by Colmer Development Company for approval of Zone Change No. 2001 -01 for a change in the - Zoning Designation from R -2 (Two Family Residential) to RPD 9 (Residential Planned Development, 9 dwelling units per acre) on one (1) parcel (APN 512 -0- 110 -112) totaling approximately 2.44 gross acres of land located on the northeast corner of Los Angeles Avenue and Flory Avenue; and WHEREAS, at its meeting of May 1 2002, the City Council opened the public hearing and took public testimony and closed the public hearing; and WHEREAS, the City Council, after review and consideration of the information contained in the City Council staff reports and testimony, has made a decision on this matter. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. That the City Council adopts the following additional findings: California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Findings 1. That the Mitigated Negative Declaration prepared for the Colmer Development Company project serves as the environmental document for the Zone Change No. 2001 -01. 2. In order to reduce the potential adverse impacts of this project, mitigation measures discussed in the Mitigated Negative Declaration have been incorporated and shall apply to Zone Change No. 2001 -01. 3. A Mitigation Reporting and Monitoring Program prepared in compliance with Assembly Bill 3180 and considered in the various decisions regarding these projects applies to Zone Change 2001 -01. oc S: \Community Development\ Everyone \Ord � lmd iA \AC� Ordinance No. Zone Change No. 2001 -01 Page 2 SECTION 2. The City Council hereby finds that the proposed Zone Change will be in conformance with the City's General Plan, subject to adoption of a Resolution approving General Plan Amendment 2001 -01, and is in conformance with the City Municipal Code, including Title 17, Zoning. SECTION 3. The City Council hereby finds that approval of this Zone Change request is in accord with public necessity, convenience, general welfare, and good zoning practice and that for those reasons it is appropriate to reclassify the property to RPD 9 dwelling units per acre, as the RPD designation would provide a suitable location for residential land uses that are compatible with property located in the vicinity of the property. SECTION 4. The City Council hereby approves Zone Change No. 2001 -01 changing the zoning designation on the property from R -2 (Two Family Residential) to RPD 9 (Residential Planned Development 9 units per acre maximum), as further described in Exhibit A. SECTION 5. The City Council hereby directs staff to amend the City Zoning Map to reflect the approved zone change. SECTION 6. That if any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, part or portion of this Ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance. The City Council declares that it would have adopted this Ordinance and each section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, part or portion thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, sentences, clauses, phrases, parts or portions be declared invalid or unconstitutional. SECTION 7. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Ordinance; shall enter the same in the book of original ordinances of said city; shall make a minute order of the passage and adoption thereof in the records of the proceedings of the City Council at which the same is passed and adopted; and shall, within fifteen (15) days after the passage and adoption thereof, cause the same to be published once in the Moorpark Star, a newspaper of general circulation, as defined in Section 6008 of Ordinance No. Zone Change No. 2001 -01 Page 3 the Government Code, for the City of Moorpark, and which is hereby designated for that purpose. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 1st day of May, 2002. _Patrick Hunter, Mayor ATTEST: Deborah S. Traffenstedt, City Clerk EXHIBIT A: Zoning Exhibit Map ZONING EXHIBIT MAP Al LOS ANGELES) HR cT n WcT �T �A S O c s t -3RD SITS) s% 0 2 -SAW ST(A m/0 < Fi-Atr < r _ 1- alf�UiM7 A� !I ' FM TM , -s 4 2 2?m 1 FSA;R I k M A �VE '? -- % --'- SUSAN A R08ERTS AW-] esTHF—P, AVEJ � S S�IEFK.! M A (HWY.1 11 8) le AVE. < <. R -2 to RPD 9 du /ac. Ll-A t � I NAJE5T1G� PE � -W Cl. / - ;' Fula If; i ► `• S lot —i CL ' % ; / i : _ _ / 1 *E'•STr.,% 7E P.L`. pi ' � //• r-- _ _ _ _ _ _ _3 Bu1TE;4fiF1L1 lN. LMM"j Lm. A NORTH EXHIBIT A 1 CHAP ^R"RAL M►GV s ►- Al LOS ANGELES) HR cT n WcT �T �A S O c s t -3RD SITS) s% 0 2 -SAW ST(A m/0 < Fi-Atr < r _ 1- alf�UiM7 A� !I ' FM TM , -s 4 2 2?m 1 FSA;R I k M A �VE '? -- % --'- SUSAN A R08ERTS AW-] esTHF—P, AVEJ � S S�IEFK.! M A (HWY.1 11 8) le AVE. < <. R -2 to RPD 9 du /ac. Ll-A t � I NAJE5T1G� PE � -W Cl. / - ;' Fula If; i ► `• S lot —i CL ' % ; / i : _ _ / 1 *E'•STr.,% 7E P.L`. pi ' � //• r-- _ _ _ _ _ _ _3 Bu1TE;4fiF1L1 lN. LMM"j Lm. A NORTH EXHIBIT A RESOLUTION NO. 2002- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 5307, RESIDENTIAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 2001 -01 and VARIANCE NO. 2002 -01 FOR THE SUBDIVISION OF APPROXIMATELY 2.44 ACRES OF LAND ON ASSESSOR PARCEL NO. 512 -0 -11 -112 INTO TWENTY -TWO SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL LOTS LOCATED ON THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF LOS ANGELES AVENUE AND FLORY STREET ON THE APPLICATION OF COLMER DEVELOPMENT COMPANY WHEREAS, at a duly - noticed Public Hearing on May 1, 2002, the City Council considered Tentative Tract Map (TTM) No. 5307, Residential Planned Development (RPD) Permit No. 2001 -01 and Variance (VAR) No. 2002 -01 on the application of Colmer Development Company for the subdivision of approximately 2.44 acres into twenty -two (22) single family residential lots and the construction of 22 single family units located on the northeast corner of Los Angeles Avenue and Flory Street (Assessor Parcel No. 512 -0 -11 -112); and WHEREAS, at its meeting of May 1, 2002, the City Council conducted a public hearing and received public testimony, and after receiving public testimony, the City Council closed the public hearing. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. The City Council does Tentative Permit No. the City's Tract Map No. 5307, Residential 2001 -01 and Variance No. 2002 -01 General Plan. hereby find that Planned Development are consistent with SECTION 2. The City Council further finds that Tentative Tract 5307 and Residential Planned Development Permit No. 2001- 01 and Variance No. 2002 -01 are consistent with Mitigated Negative Declaration prepared for the projects. SECTION 3. That the City Council adopts the following additional findings: S: \Community Development \Everyone \Resolutions and Conditions \cc 020501 reso rpd ttm var colmerl.doc / _ Modified: 04/24/02 ATT j� CH ■ ENT /��/ RESOLUTION NO. 2002 - TTM No. 5307, RPD No. Page 2 2001 -01, VAR 2002 -01 California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Findings 1. That the Mitigated Negative Declaration prepared for GPA 2001 -01, ZC 2001 -01, RPD 2001 -01, TTM 5307 and VAR 2002 -01 serves as the environmental document for the Tentative Tract Map, Residential Planned Development Permit and Variance. _ 2. In order to reduce the potential adverse impacts of this project, mitigation measures discussed in the Mitigated Negative Declaration have been incorporated and shall apply to Tentative Tract Map No. 5307, Residential Planned Development Permit No. 2001 -01 and Variance 2002 -01. 3. A Mitigation Reporting and Monitoring Program prepared in compliance with Assembly Bill 3180 and considered in the various decisions regarding these projects applies to Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 5307, Residential Planned Development Permit No. 2001 -01 and Variance No. 2002 -01. Subdivision Map Act Findings: Based on the information set forth above, it has been determined that Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 5307, with imposition of the attached conditions, meets the requirements of California Government Code Sections 66473.5, 66474, 66474.6, and 66478.1 et seq., in that: 1. The proposed map is consistent with the City of Moorpark General Plan and Zoning Ordinance. 2. That the design and improvements of the proposed subdivision is consistent with the City of Moorpark General Plan. 3. The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed. 4. The site is physically suitable for the proposed density of development. S: \Community Development \Everyone \Resolutions and Conditions \cc 020501 reso rpd ttm var colmerl.doc Modified: 04/24/02 RESOLUTION NO. 2002 - TTM No. 5307, RPD No. 2001 -01, VAR 2002 -01 Page 3 5. The design of the subdivision and the proposed improvements are not likely to cause substantial environmental damage. 6. The design of the subdivision and the type of improvements are not likely to cause serious public health problems. 7. The design of the subdivision and the type of improvements will not conflict with easements acquired by the public at large, for access through, or use of the property within the proposed subdivision. 8. There will be no discharge of waste from the proposed subdivision into an existing community sewer system in violation of existing water quality control requirements under Water Code Section 13000 et seq. 9. The proposed subdivision does not contain or front upon any public waterway, river, stream, coastline, shoreline, lake, or reservoir. Residential Planned Development Permit Findings: 1. The proposed project is consistent with the intent and provisions of the City's General Plan and Zoning Ordinance. 2. The proposed project is compatible with the character of surrounding development. 3. The proposed project would not be obnoxious or harmful, or impair the utility of neighboring property or uses. 4. The proposed project would not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience, or welfare. 5. The proposed project is compatible with existing and planned land uses in the general area where the development is to be located. 6. The proposed project is compatible with the scale, visual character and design of the surrounding properties, designed so as to enhance the physical and visual quality of the community, and the structure(s) have design features which provide visual relief and separation between land uses of conflicting character. S: \Community Development \Everyone \Resolutions and Conditions \cc 020501 reso rpd ttm var colmerl.doc Modified: 04/24/02 RESOLUTION NO. 2002 - TTM No. 5307, RPD No. 2001 -01, VAR 2002 -01 Page 4 Variance Findings 1. That there are special circumstances applicable to the subject property, with regard to size, shape, topography, location or surroundings, such that the strict application of the zoning regulations deprives such property of privileges enjoyed by other property in the vicinity and under identical zoning classification. The project is _located adjacent to Los Angeles Avenue, which is a four - lane divided major arterial. The annual average two -way traffic in 2001 was 34,000 vehicles. This number is expected to increase to 38,900 vehicles by 2020. In addition 19.4% of all the vehicles consist of medium to heavy trucks using the route as an alternative to H -101. In order for the project to comply with the City's adopted exterior noise standard of 65 dBA, a sound wall must be constructed along Los Angeles Avenue ranging in height from 9.5 to 11.5 feet above the centerline of Los Angeles Avenue. 2. That the granting of the Variance will not confer a special privilege inconsistent with the limitations upon other properties in the same vicinity and zone. Other existing residential properties located along Los Angeles Avenue utilize tall sound walls to mitigate the noise from Los Angeles Avenue. In addition since this is an infill project on an existing school site, it was not possible to provide a large setback from the edge of Los Angeles Avenue. 3. That the strict application of the zoning regulations as they apply to the subject property would result in practical difficulties or unnecessary hardships inconsistent with the general purpose of such regulations in that the residents of the proposed homes would not be able to enjoy the use of their back yards due to the traffic noise from Los Angeles Avenue. 4. That the granting of the Variance will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, nor to the use, enjoyment or valuation of neighboring properties as the sound wall will be properly engineered and constructed. S: \Community Development \Everyone \Resolutions and Conditions \cc 020501 reso rpd ttm var colmerl.doc Modified: 04/24/02 RESOLUTION NO. 2002 - TTM No. 5307, RPD No. Page 5 2001 -01, VAR 2002 -01 The overall visual height of the wall will be reduced by the provision of a 2 to 3 foot high planter located in front of the wall. The landscape planer will be landscaped with shrubs and vines to further screen the wall. SECTION Map No. 5307, and Variance Approval. 4. That the Residential No. 2002 -01 City Council approves Tentative Tract Planned Development Permit No. 2001 -01 subject to the attached Conditions of SECTION 5. The approval of Tentative Tract Map No. 5307, Residential Planned Development Permit No. 2001 -01 and Variance No. 2002 -01 is contingent upon final approval by the City Council of General Plan Amendment No. 2001 -01 and Zone Change No. 2001 -01 and shall not become effective until the effective date of the zone change ordinance. SECTION 6. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this resolution and shall cause a certified resolution to be filed in the book of original resolutions. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 1st day of May 2002. Patrick Hunter, Mayor ATTEST: Deborah S. Traffenstedt, City Clerk Exhibit A: Conditions of Approval for Tract Map No. 5307, Residential Planned Development Permit No. 2001 -01 and Variance No. 2002 -01. S: \Community Development \Everyone \Resolutions and Conditions \cc 020501 reso rpd ttm var colmerl.doc Modified: 04/24/02 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL PER PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION PC- 2002 -422 (See Attachment 2) EXHIBIT A CITY OF MOORPARK COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 799 MOORPARK AVENUE MOORPARK, CA 93021 MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION I. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: 1. Entitlements: Residential Planned Development (RPD 2001 -01) Tract Map 5307 General Plan Amendment (GPA 2001 -01) Zone Change (ZC 2001 -01) Variance (VAR 2002 -01) 2. Applicant: Mr. Wayne Colmer Colmer Development 5000 Parkway Calabasas, Ste. 110 Calabasas, CA 91302 3. Proposal: A Tentative Tract Map to subdivide a portion (2.40 acres) of the Flory School site to create a small lot subdivision consisting of 22 lots. A Residential Planned Development permit to construct 22 single family dwellings and a Variance to allow an 11.5 foot high wall along portions of Los Angeles Avenue for purposes of sound attenuation. The application includes a request for a General Plan Amendment from S (School) to VH (Very High Density) and Zone Change from R -2 (Two Family Residential) to RPD (Residential Planned Development -9 Dwelling Units /Acre). 4. Location: Northeast comer of Los Angeles Avenue and Flory Avenue APN #512 -0 -11 -112 5. Responsible Agencies: None II. STATEMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL FINDINGS: An initial study was conducted by the Community Development Department to evaluate the potential effects of this project upon the environment. Based upon the findings contained in the attached initial study, it has been determined that this project would not have a significant effect upon the environment. Mitigation measures described and attached have been added to the project and a Mitigated Negative Declaration will be prepared. ��� A TTACHMENT? C� - III. PUBLIC REVIEW: 1. Public Notice: Publication of a notice in a newspaper of general circulation the area. 2. Document Posting Period 3/5/02 to 4/2/02. IV. ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED: The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages: [X] Land Use and Planning [] Transportation/Circulation [ J Public Services [ ] Population and Housing [ ] Biological Resources [ ] Utilities & Service Systems [ ] Geological Problems [ ] Energy and Mineral Resources [X] Aesthetics [ ] Water [X] Hazards [ ] Cultural Resources [ ] Air Quality [X] Noise [ ] Recreation V. MITIGATION MEASURES 1) A sound wall shall be constructed along the southern property line of Lots 1 through 11, along Los Angeles Avenue. The top of the sound wall must be 9.5 feet above the centerline surface of Los Angeles Avenue for Lots 1 and 2, 10.5 feet above the centerline for Lots 3 to 9 and 11.5 feet above the centerline for Lots 10 and 11. 2) The sound wall shall extend at least 20 feet to the north on the west side of Lot 1 and at least 20 feet on the east side of Lot 11. These extensions would then transition gradually in height down to a standard 6 -foot high wall height. 3) To reduce the interior noise levels, a minimum window glass thickness of 3/16 -inch and a standard exterior wall of 5/8 -inch gypsum board, 3.5 -inch fiberglass filled cavity, 7/8 -inch latch and stucco, typical for single family residential developments shall be installed. 4) All second story windows along Los Angeles Avenue shall be Milgard type 5120 double glazed window assemblies or an equivalent with a minimum STC 33 rating. 5) All rear and side entry doors of the homes on Lots 1 through 11 shall be gasketed (jamb, head, sill) with interlocking or tube -type compression weather - stripping, or an effective equivalent. 2 VI. REFERENCE LIST The references used in preparing this questionnaire include the following: Standard References: 1. EIR for Moorpark Land Use and Circulation Element Update and Sphere of Influence Expansion Study (1992). 2. Federal Emergency Management Agency, Flood Insurance Rate Map, Community Panel Number 060712 005 A, September 29, 1986 and revision dated August 24, 1990. 3. General Plan of the City of Moorpark, as amended through 2002. 4. Institute of Transportation Engineers, Trip Generation, 1987. 5. Moorpark Municipal Code, including Title 17, Zoning.. 6. Moorpark Traffic Analysis Model Model Description and Validation, June 1994. 7. Technical Appendices for the General Plan Noise Element, November 1994. 8. U.S.G.S. Topographic Quadrangle Maps for Moorpark. 9. Ventura County Air Pollution Control District, Guidelines for the Preparation of Air Quality Impact Analyses, 1989. 10. Ventura County Air Pollution Control District, Ventura County Air Quality Management Plan, 1991. Project References: 1. Traffic Noise Study Report, Advanced Engineering Acoustics, March 14, 2001 and June 8, 2001 Addendum. 2. Phase I Environmental Assessment Report, Chaparral Associates, September 24, 1986. 3. Tree Valuation Report, Kevin J. Small Associates, March 15, 2001. 4. Geotechnical Investigation Report, Geolabs, February 22, 2001. I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for this Initial Environmental Study to the best of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. Prepared By Joyce Parker - Bozylinski Date: March 4, 2002 Case Planner Approved By: Deborah S. Traffenstedt Date Acting Director of Community Development 3 INITIAL STUDY CHECKLIST Environmental Factor Potentially Significant Less Than Significant Less Than signiricant No Impact b) Conflict with an applicable land use plan, policy or regulation of an Impact with X agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited Miti ation X LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the project: a Physically divide an established community? X b) Conflict with an applicable land use plan, policy or regulation of an X agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited X to the general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? c) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or natural X communities conservation plan? X d) Result in direct or indirect population related growth inducement impacts (significantly expand employment opportunities, remove policy impediments to growth, or contribute to potential extensions X of growth inducing infrastructure)? 2. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or X special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service? b) Have a substantially adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, X policies, and regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U. S. Wildlife Service? c) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not X limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interru tion, or other means? d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident X migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? X f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Conservation Community Plan, and other approved X local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan? g) Result in damage to, loss of, or removal of native oak trees or other locally identified specimen trees of significance? X %-e v .:.....el Environmental Factor Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant Significant Impact Impact I with ';_ AIR nUALITY: Would the project: 4. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the project: a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource as defined in Section 15064.5 X b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resources pursuant to Section 15064.5 X c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature? X d) Disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of formal cemeteries? X e) Result in physical disruption of an identified sacred place or other ethnographically documented location of significance to native X ("alifnrnianc7 X GEOLOGY AND SOILS. Would the project: a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury or death involving: (i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist -Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map X issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of X Mines and Geology Special Publication 42. (ii) Strong seismic ground shaking? X X (iii) Seismic - related ground failure, including liquefaction? (iv) Landslides? b Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? X c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature? X d) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in X on- or off -site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? 5 Environmental Factor Potentially i Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant Significant Impact Impact With e) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18 -a -B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial risks to life or X X property? f) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic X tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems where sewers are X not available for the disposal of wastewater? g) Result in remediation scars (benched slopes, etc.) whose X dimensions cannot be predicted with reasonable accuracy based on a preliminary geotechnical report? 6. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS. Would the project? a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use or disposal of hazardous materials? X b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the X likely release of hazardous materials into the environment? c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one - quarter mile of an X exiting or proposed school? d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section X 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or X public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in X the project area? g) Impair implementation of, or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? X h) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are X adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands? Environmental Factor Potentially Less Than Less Than No requirements? Significant Significant Significant Impact b) Substantially degrade groundwater supplies or interfere Impact With substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a Mitigation 7. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY. Would the project: a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements? X b) Substantially degrade groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater X table level (e.g., the production rate of pre - existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted)? X c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, X or substantially increase the rate or surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on- or off site? d) Create or contribute runoff which would exceed the capacity of X existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide X substantial additional sources of polluted runoff? X e Otherwise substantially degrade water quality? X fl Place housing within a 100 -year floodplain, as mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other X flood hazard delineation map? g) Place within a 100 -year flood hazard area structures which would impede or redirect flood flows? X h) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the X failure of a levee or dam? i) Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow? X 8. AESTHETICS. Would the project: a) Obstruct any scenic vista or view open to the public or will the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive X development open to public view? b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state scenic X highway? c) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of the project site and its surroundings? X d) Create sources of incompatibility with the existing scenic and aesthetic environment of the community or quality of life impacts X on residents? e) Create a new source of substantial light or glare which would adversely affect day views in the area? X f) Significantly impact any existing streetscape or public space which has been designed to provide areas of public assembly and X congregation? g) Conflict with adopted design guidelines or development standards which have been implemented to improve the quality of X architecture in the community? „t",,,, 11% 1. �- Environmental Factor Potentially Significant Less Than Significant Less Than significant No Impact would be of value to the region and the residents of the state? Impact With X b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally important mineral Mitigation X 9. MINERAL AND NATURAL RESOURCES. Would the project: a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that X would be of value to the region and the residents of the state? X X b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally important mineral X resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific X plan or other land use plan? X X 10 NOISE. Would the project result in: a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in excess of X standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, X or applicable standards of other agencies? X b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive groundbome X vibration or groundbome noise levels? X X c) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the X project vicinity above levels existing without the project or in rural X areas, increase measurably the ambient noise levels more than 5 X dbs? d) For a project located within an airport land use plan, or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or X public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? e) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to X excessive noise levels? 11. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the project: a) Result in impacts to an established ethnic community? X b) Create substantial demands for affordable low income housing in a jurisdiction which does not have an adequate stock of such X housing? X c) Result in substantial conflicts between type, size, and quality of X proposed and existing housing in the project vicinity? X d) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? X 12. PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered government facilities, need for new or physically altered government facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance uu c�uvca lul all vi &'IV MVa,v v X a) Fire protection? b Police protection? X c Schools? X d Parks? X e) Other public facilities? X M Environmental Factor Potentially Significant Less Than Significant Less Than Significant No Impact recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of Impact with X the facility would occur or be accelerated? Miti ation 13. RECREATION. Would the project: a) Increase the use of existing neighborhood or regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of X the facility would occur or be accelerated? b) Does the project include recreational facilities or require the X construction or expansion of recreational facilities which might X have an adverse physical effect on the environment? X 14. TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC. Would the nroiect: a) Cause an increase in the traffic which is substantial in relation to the existing traffic load and capacity of the street system (i.e., result X in a substantial increase in either the number of vehicle trips, the volume to capacity ratio on roads, or congestion at intersections)? X b) Exceed, either individually or cumulatively, a level of service standard established by the county congestion management agency X or City General Plan Circulation Element threshold? c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either an X increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in X substantial safety risks? d) Substantially increase hazards related to existing intersections or X roadway design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous X intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g. residential traffic conflicts with farm equipment)? X e) Result in inadequate secondary or emergency access? X f) Result in inadequate parking capacity? X g) Conflict with adopted policies or programs supporting alternative transportation (e.g., bus turnouts, bicycle racks)? X 15. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the project: a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board? X b) Require or result in construction of new water or wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the X construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? c) Require or result in the construction of new storm water drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of X which could cause significant environmental effects? d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded X entitlements needed? e) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider which services or may serve the project determined that it has X adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments? Environmental Factor f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to accommodate the project's solid waste disposal needs for a minimum ten -year period? g) Comply with federal, state, and local statues and regulations related to solid waste? h) Provide for on -site source separation and recycling facilities which are adequately sized for the proposed use? 16. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE. Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant Significant Impact Impact with X ►0 i) Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife X species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self - sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal, or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? j) Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ( "Cumulatively considerable" means X that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of the past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects)? k) Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or X indirectly? Land Use - The proposed project would be inconsistent with the current General Plan and Zoning designation on the property. However, the application includes a request for a General Plan Amendment to change the land use designation from S (School) to VH (Very High Residential) and a Zone Change to change the land use designation from R -2 (Two Family Residential to RPD (Residential Planned Development). Hazards - A portion of the site is currently being used for school bus storage and vehicle maintenance activities. Two underground fuel tanks are located on the site and hazardous wastes (oil, solvents, cleaners, engine coolants, etc.) are generated and temporarily stored at the site. A Phase I Environmental Assessment Report was completed for the project and found that while the vehicle maintenance activities at the property involve the use of hazardous materials and hazardous wastes are generated on site, the subject property appears to be free of any contamination. Aesthetics - The project proposes to construct a sound wall along Los Angeles Avenue ranging in height from 9.5 feet to 11.5 feet. In order to screen the wall, the project will provide a 5 to 6.foot wide landscape planter in front of the wall adjacent to Los Angeles Avenue. This planter will be planted with shrubs and vines to screen the wall and tree wells are provided at the corner of each lot. 10 Noise - A noise study prepared for the project analyzed the noise from traffic on Los Angeles Avenue. The results of the study indicate that the outdoor living areas (side and rear yards) of the lots adjacent to Los Angeles Avenue (Lots 1 though 11) would comply with the City's 65 dBA CNEL traffic noise limit with the installation of a sound wall along Los Angeles Avenue. The sound wall would range from 9.5 to 11.5 feet above the centerline of Los Angeles Avenue. The study also recommended mitigation measures such as increased window thickness, double - glazing of windows and gasketing of doors) to reduce the interior noise levels to 45 CNEL as required by the City. CEQA MITIGATION MEASURES Noise 6) A sound wall shall be constructed along the southern property line of Lots 1 through 11, along Los Angeles Avenue. The top of the sound wall must be 9.5 feet above the centerline surface of Los Angeles Avenue for Lots 1 and 2, 10.5 feet above the centerline for Lots 3 to 9 and 11.5 feet above the centerline for Lots 10 and 11. 7) The sound wall shall extend at least 20 feet to the north on the west side of Lot 1 and at least 20 feet on the east side of Lot 11. These extensions would then transition gradually in height down to a standard 6 -foot high wall height. 8) To reduce the interior noise levels, a minimum window glass thickness of 3/16 -inch and a standard exterior wall of 5/8 -inch gypsum board, 3.5 -inch fiberglass filled cavity, 7/8 -inch latch and stucco, typical for single family residential developments shall be installed. 9) All second story windows along Los Angeles Avenue shall be Milgard type 5120 double glazed window assemblies or an equivalent with a minimum STC 33 rating. 10) All rear and side entry doors of the homes on Lots 1 through 11 shall be gasketed (jamb, head, sill) with interlocking or tube -type compression weather - stripping, or an effective equivalent. 11 Advanced Engineering Acoustics 663 Bristol Avenue Simi Valley, California 93065 -5402 (805) 583 -8207 - Voice (805) 522 -6636 - Fax (805) 231 -1242 - Cell June 8, 2001 Mr. Wayne Colmer Colmer Development 5000 Parkway Calabasas Calabasas, CA 91302 Subject: 22 -Lot Residential Development at East L.A. Ave & Flory Street in Moorpark Reference: AEA's Traffic Noise Study Report for the Colmer Development, dated March 2001 _ Dear Mr. Colmer: Advanced Engineering Acoustics (AEA) has reviewed and analyzed the raising of the subject residence pads by 2 feet and the affect on the heights of the sound wall along East Los Angeles Ave. This letter report presents the results of the analysis. This document may be submitted by Colmer Development to the City of Moorpark. The results of the referenced AEA report indicated that the outdoor living areas (side and rear yards) of Lots 1 through 11 would comply with the 65 dBA CNEL traffic noise limit of the City, with a proper sound wall along Los Angeles Ave. The raising of the residence pads of these Lots has required another look at the performance of the recommended sound walls. At your request, we have analyzed Lots 1 through 11 with the higher pad elevations. The following table gives the new recommended sound wall heights. Lot Number Minimum Sound Wall Height above Los Angeles Ave. Center Line Pavement Surface Approximate Sound Wall Distance from Los Angeles Ave. Center Line 1 and 2 9.5 feet 65 feet 3 through 9 10.5 feet 65 feet Ed 10 and 11 11.5 feet 65 feet If you have any questions regarding this noise report supplement, please contact me at (805) 583- 8207, or on my cell phone at (805) 231 -1242. I am available to work with you, as needed, as you complete this project. Sincerely, Marlund E. Hale, Ph.D.. P.E. Technical Director R1 E . "F;I V ED GL ATTACHMENT o ,ra 10-. "T A A TRAFFIC NOISE STUDY REPORT FOR THE COLMER RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT IN THE CITY OF MOORPARK COUNTY OF VENTURA MARCH 14, 2001 Submitted to COWER DEVELOPMENT 5000 Parkway Calabasas, Suite 110 Calabasas, CA 91302 Submitted by ADVANCED ENGINEERING ACOUSTICS 663 Bristol Avenue Simi Valley, CA 93065 -5402 IMED MAR 2 0 2001 , ���rt��k�RNPIt TRAFFIC NOISE STUDY FOR THE COLMER RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT ON LOS ANGELES AVENUE BETWEEN FLORY AVENUE AND MILLARD AVENUE 1.0 INTRODUCTION The site layout plan and project floor plan drawings (Colmer, 2001) for the proposed 22- unit single family housing development in Moorpark, California have been reviewed to determine compliance with the City of Moorpark (City) noise control requirements. The following assessment and recommendations are provided as a result of the review and analysis of noise impacts due to traffic on East Los Angeles Avenue, between Flory Avenue and just west of Millard Avenue. The proposed project site is located on a partially developed lot on the north side of Los Angeles Avenue. Figure 1 shows the project vicinity. The site is bordered to the west by Flory Avenue and on the east by single - family residential properties on Millard Avenue. Flory Avenue Elementary School property and other public buildings border the north side of the site. There will be one traffic entrance to the site from Flory Avenue. Figure 2 shows the proposed layout of the project and the nearby roadways. Lots 1 -11 (numbered west to east) are closest to Los Angeles Avenue traffic. Lots 12 -22 (numbered east to west) are further north and across a new street from Lots 1 -11. 2.0 NOISE CONTROL STANDARDS The City of Moorpark has established interior and exterior noise criteria for the development of any new residential dwellings in order to protect the health and welfare of the residents (Moorpark, 2001a). These are specified in the Noise Element of the General Plan and the Technical Appendix to the Noise Element (Moorpark, 1998). The interior noise limit is an energy average community noise equivalent level (CNEL) of 45 dBA and applies to all interior areas except bathrooms, closets and corridors. The exterior noise level is to be mitigated so that the interior noise limit is not exceeded while the windows are closed. The exterior noise standard is an energy average CNEL of 65 dBA and applies to all exterior living spaces, which are defined as a single family private yard, a multi - family private patio served by an interior exit, and mobile home parks. The CNEL noise descriptor is a 24 -hour, time - weighted average noise level. It is a single number composed of the logarithmic sum of the hourly equivalent energy average noise levels (LeQ) with an additional 5 dB added to the hourly levels between 7 pm and 10 pm and 10 dB added to those hourly levels between 10 pm and 7 am. Colmer Resi, .,Ial Development March 2001 iE W • 4 1 - 1111,11t, r 20 I r 18 'spli 05 TR 13 4 -------- - - - .... ....... 8 1. UuL—L- 10 I . . .......... Fio� Ri 7 THE- . . ....... :M-2 ...;hHhbb. 5�.T 54 ASPH LOS ANGELES :—C 9 e_: VF FIGURE 2. PROJECT LAYOUT MAP AND SOUND METER LOCATIONS t: 3 Colmer Residential Development March 2001 3.0 CURRENT AND FUTURE TRAFFIC NOISE The main contributor of noise from the south of this site is traffic on East Los Angeles Avenue, between Flory Avenue and Millard Avenue. Los Angeles Avenue is a four -lane divided major arterial, which runs east and west, south of the proposed development. 3.1 Roadway Traffic Volumes Los Angeles Avenue Average Daily Traffic (ADT) and peak hour volumes for most recent years (1998 and 1999) were obtained from the Caltrans website (Caltrans, 2001). The 20 -year build -out (2020) traffic volumes were estimated at 3/4% growth rate per year, based on the 1997 to 1999 ADT data from Caltrans (Caltrans, 2001). The truck traffic mix was also obtained from the Caltrans website. These data are presented on Table 1. TABLE 1 - LOS ANGELES AVENUE TRAFFIC DATA Annual Ave rage Two ay Daily Traffic (ADT Los An eles Avenue Traffic ADT 337000 33,500 33,500 34,000 38,900 Peak Hour % 9.5 9.6 9.6 9.6 9.6 % Medium Trucks 8.0 8.0 n/a 8.0 8.0 % Heavy Trucks 11.4 11.4 n/a 11.4 11.4 Speed Limit (mph) 35/ 35/ 35/ 35/ 35/ 25 ** 25 ** 25 ** 25 ** 25 ** n/a = not available from Caltrans * Projections based on available data and growth rate assumption. * * Speed Limit when children are present. 3.2 Noise Measurement and Analysis Morning peak hour noise measurements were conducted at the proposed project site along Los Angeles Avenue on Wednesday, January 31, 2001. The two project site traffic noise monitoring locations are shown on Figure 2. The noise monitoring equipment were ANSI Type 2 sound level meters and were calibrated before and after the noise monitoring sessions, according to the manufacturer's instructions. CNEL values were calculated using a computer program based on the Federal Highway Traffic Noise Prediction Model (FHWA, 1978) which uses Average Daily Traffic (ADT) volumes. The program takes into account the locations of receptors, roadway noise sources using the CALVENO emissions, and noise barriers, and determines CNEL both with and without sound walls. The unshielded and unmitigated Year 2020 65 CNEL contour distance from the centerline of Los Angeles Avenue would be about 46 meters (150 feet). The noise levels for existing and projected traffic volumes on Los Angeles Avenue are summarized on Table 2. 4 Colmer Residential Development March 2001 4.0 NOISE CONTROL RECOMMENDATIONS 4.1 Los Angeles Avenue Environs As shown on Table 2, the existing and future exterior CNEL traffic noise levels along the southern area of the project toward Los Angeles Avenue are greater than the 65 CNEL noise limits. The predicted CNEL sound levels at the residential locations, for barrier heights which achieve the CNEL criterion, are given on Table 3. Figure 3 shows the sound wall locations and the Year 2020 unmitigated and mitigated 65 CNEL contour. During peak traffic noise hours, noise levels at the outdoor living areas of the project residences, with properly implemented sound walls, would be at or below the City's exterior criteria of 65 CNEL. TABLE 2 - MEASURED AND UNMITIGATED NOISE MODEL RESULTS PH = Peak Noise Hour. Note 1: Calibration K factor of —3.2 dB to match predicted with measured Leq. Note 2: Interior peak noise hour estimates based on 15 dB noise reduction with closed windows. TABLE 3 - MITIGATED TRAFFIC NOISE MODEL RESULTS (with sound wall noise barrier mitigation) 2020 1 South Rear Exterior 72 68 65 64 63 4 South Rear Exterior 72 68 66 65 63 8 South Rear Exteriorl 73 69 66 65 64 11 1 South Rear Exteriorl 73 69 67 66 64 Note l: Interior noise is estimated to be 15 dB lower than the exterior CNEL. 4.2 Southern Property Line Mitigation It is recommended that a sound wall be constructed along the southern property line of Lots 1 through 11, along Los Angeles Avenue. The top of the sound wall must be 2.4 meters i.at iVleasurect PH Pxdieted I'S Pred►eted Year >`Iumbcr current Site 1TL (dH r 2001 15 ft to South PL, 71.5 72.0 71.5 20 ft to West PL 8 15 ft to So.PL fence 72.5 72.5 72.0 fear t Future Site LoCatiort P�red�etcd P.R i Pclictett Chi Ei�dBA i ::Number Le` tdBA) Exterior 72 72 2020 1 South Side of House Interiorl 57 57 Exterior 73 73 FJ 8 Sout L Side of House Interiorl 5 g 5 8 PH = Peak Noise Hour. Note 1: Calibration K factor of —3.2 dB to match predicted with measured Leq. Note 2: Interior peak noise hour estimates based on 15 dB noise reduction with closed windows. TABLE 3 - MITIGATED TRAFFIC NOISE MODEL RESULTS (with sound wall noise barrier mitigation) 2020 1 South Rear Exterior 72 68 65 64 63 4 South Rear Exterior 72 68 66 65 63 8 South Rear Exteriorl 73 69 66 65 64 11 1 South Rear Exteriorl 73 69 67 66 64 Note l: Interior noise is estimated to be 15 dB lower than the exterior CNEL. 4.2 Southern Property Line Mitigation It is recommended that a sound wall be constructed along the southern property line of Lots 1 through 11, along Los Angeles Avenue. The top of the sound wall must be 2.4 meters Colmer Residential Development March 2001 (8 feet) above the center line surface of Los Angeles Avenue for Lots 1 and 2, 2.7 meters (9 feet) above the Los Angeles Avenue center line surface for Lots 3 to 9, and 3.0 meters (10 feet) above the center line surface of Los Angeles Avenue for Lots 10 and 11. The sound wall would need to extend at least 20 feet to the north on the west side of Lot 1 and at least 20 feet on the east side of Lot 11. These extensions would then transition gradually in height down to a standard 1.8 meters (6 feet) yard wall height. The sound wall would need to extend as shown on the project layout plan (Figure 3). Once properly installed, the recommended sound wall would provide the required noise attenuation from Los Angeles Avenue traffic for all backyards and side yards of the project. 4.3 Interior Noise Level Reduction To calculate the noise reduction of the planned residences, noise sensitive rooms for each floor level were evaluated using a method developed for the FHWA (FHWA, 1977). Since it would be impossible to obtain an interior noise of 45 CNEL or below with the "windows open ", the method used was a "windows closed" analysis. This method is acceptable since central air and heating, featured in all the designed structures, fulfills the requirement for mechanical ventilation for a "windows closed" analysis to be considered. A minimum window glass thickness of 3/16 -inch and a standard exterior wall of 5/8 -inch gypsum board, 3.5 -inch fiberglass filled cavity, 7/8 -inch lath and stucco, typical for single family residential developments, will provide approximately 15 -20 dBA noise reduction for traffic -type noise. Double glazing the windows and gasketing the doors will increase the noise reduction to about 20 -25 dBA. Since sound walls typically provide no mitigation for second stories, double glazing of all residential second story windows of Lots 1 to 11, with a view (even though blocked by trees) of Los Angeles Avenue, is recommended. NElgard type 5120 double glazed window assemblies, or an equivalent with a minimum STC 33 rating, is recommended, for all double glazing applications. It is further recommended that rear and side entry doors of the above specified eleven houses be gasketed (jamb, head, sill) with interlocking or tube -type compression weather- stripping, or an effective equivalent. 5.0 CONCLUSIONS An analysis has been performed to determine compliance of the proposed single - family residential development north of Los Angeles Avenue, between Flory Avenue and Millard Avenue, with City of Moorpark noise standards. The analysis shows that impacts on the project would not exceed the 65 CNEL outdoor living area noise standards, once the recommended exterior noise control measures are properly implemented. It also has been determined that a well constructed, standard exterior building shell, along with the proper implementation of the recommended architectural noise mitigation measures, for the eleven specified structures, would reduce the traffic noise within the residential interiors of Lots 1 through 11 to less than 45 CNEL, as required by the City of Moorpark. No traffic noise mitigation measures are required for Lots 12 -22. T Colmer Resia—vial Development March 2001 .50 • 4 .509.53 so ry A189 *SS'00 em KC7. ASN 14 V4 20 o x5=0.36 4 12 - , is: 13, L._ L --- A7 c EL 65 CN son 41L$a 7 L i 4r�4' % 01-1 U 7 3 ASNI Kul' 54 ASPH LOS ANGELES- FIGURE 3. UNMITIGATED 65 CNEL CONTOUR AND RECOMMENDED SOUND WALL LOCATION 7 Colmer Residential Development March 2001 6.0 REFERENCES 4 Caltrans, 2001. Traffic and Vehicle Data Systems Unit, Caltrans Traffic Operations, January. Colmer, 2001. Lot Plans for a Residential Development on Los Angeles Avenue in Moorpark, CA. Colmer Development Company, Calabasas, CA. January. FHWA, 1977. Federal Highway Administration Highway Traffic Noise Prediction Model, FHWA -TS -77 -202. Prepared by T.M. Barry and J.A. Reagan. December. FHWA, 1978. Insulation of Buildings Against Highway Noise Manual, FHWA -RD -77 -108. Prepared by B. Davy and S. Skale. August. Moorpark, 1998. City of Moorpark, Noise Element of the General Plan. Match. Moorpark, 2001a. City of Moorpark, Planning Department, conversations with M. Hale. January & February. Moorpark, 2001b. City of Moorpark, Traffic Engineer, conversations with M. Hale and response for requested traffic data. January & February. A-' ,-,k �.�' , To: From 4P CITY OF MOORPARK COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM Honorable City Council Deborah S. Traffenstedt, Acting Community Development Director ) Prepared By: Laura Stringer, Senior Management Analyst Date: May 1, 2002 (CC meeting of 5/1/02) ln�5 Subject: Item 9. B., Additional Exhibits for General Plan Amendment No. 2001 -01, Zone Change No. 2001 -01, Tentative Tract Map No. 5307, Residential Planned Development No. 2001 -01 and Variance No. 2002 -01on the Application of Colmer Development Company The applicant has provided the City Council with these reduced copies of the colored renderings of the front elevations of each unit. Unfortunately, the copying process does not reflect the actual colors as proposed by the applicant. Please refer to the color board and full scale color drawings, which will be available at the meeting, for a more accurate depiction of architectural colors. Also included, is a copy of the sketch showing the impact of recommended revisions to Condition No. 80 to provide for a fifty foot (501) curb radius at the north east corner of Los Angeles Avenue and Flory Avenue. S: \Community Development \Everyone \City Council Agenda Reports \cc 020501 memo exhibits Colmer.doc f w � r - � r ,/.�ff'�'•y.'s� ec `,'h, '' -.t '. eta d +'.r. Si v V .Il�w 6 ftng Noma t o ! • t war .r.iI r.> _ �® 4. r w ' s p 7,j ' �C a: r Iva+1;rte 1;, f 9PANI SH I -C Y- G ill �Il E L E V A T I O N S SCALE 1/4 V -0" F L O R Y A V E N U E COLMER DEVELOPMENT BASSENIAN LAGONI ARCHITECTS 01:18 -02 LEGEND A. 'S' TtLE B. FLAT TILE C. STUCCO CORBEL D. DECORATIVE VENT E. STUCCO F. STONE G. SECTIONAL GARAGE DOOR H. COPPER ROOF I. WOOD SHUTTER I. WOOD POTSHELF K. DECORATIVE TILE L. WROUGHT IRON M. VINYL WINDOW N. METAL VENT