Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAGENDA REPORT 2002 0515 CC REG ITEM 11IL j j' ____ r _r.:19ZOf�:RS1t'�"�TS�!s ^r.�'✓, 77 L- MOORPARK CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT TO: The Honorable City Council FROM: Steven Kueny, City Manager DATE: May 9, 2002 (CC Meeting of May 15, 2002) SUBJECT: Consider Upgrade of Secretary I Position in Assistant City Manager's Office and Modification to Salary Plan DISCUSSION: For several years, the Administrative Services Department had a Secretary I position that supported the clerical and secretarial functions for the Department. The Administrative Services Department also had an Administrative Secretary that provided primary secretarial and administrative support to the Assistant City Manager, who headed the Department. With the appointment of a Director of Administrative Services, the modification of the Administrative Secretary position to Administrative Services Technician and the split of the Department with the separation of the Assistant City Managers Office from the Administrative Services Department, the Secretary I position has taken on a higher level of secretarial support to the Assistant City Manager, especially relative to emergency services, redevelopment, economic development and public information activities. This position has also assumed primary responsibility for administration of the Business Registration Program. An upgrade of the position from Secretary I to Secretary II and a promotion of the incumbent employee is warranted. It's recommended that the City Council approve this upgrade effective May 17, 2002, Costs for this change can be absorbed by other savings in the department and on an annual basis for salary and benefits would result in an approximate cost of $4,500. 4 V V wwi�.r. a City Council Agenda Report May 9, 2002 (CC Meeting of May 15, 2002) Page 2 In September 2001, the City Council modified the salary plan for division heads from Range 71 to a combined range of 71 -74 and for department heads from Range 79 to a combined range of 79 -81. This was to allow flexibility for hiring. This was also in response to difficulty in successfully recruiting to fill these positions and an independent salary survey (prepared by a contract consultant for another jurisdiction that included Moorpark's salary ranges). That survey showed Moorpark's management positions 10 -20 percent below comparable positions. Even with the implementation of the September 2001 changes, it has been difficult to obtain a large candidate pool. For those hired (and offered and declined), it has been at or above the 7th step of the City's 11 step salary plan. It has also resulted in new hires receiving a starting salary at or above comparable or higher level positions (salary compaction). The issue of salary compaction and related separation between mid - management, division heads and department heads, needs to be addressed to ensure both internal equity but also to enhance recruitment and retention. I'm recommending an additional 21,� percent in the salary ranges between division heads and mid - management and between department heads and division heads. The percent of range difference between the other management positions would remain the same. It's recommended that the specific percent salary range difference between the different management levels be as follows: Management Current % Salary Proposed % Salary Level Range Difference Range Difference Mid- 67 N/A 67 NA Management Division 71 -74 171-1% 75 20% Head Department 79 -81 171x% 83 20% Head Deputy City 83 5% 85 5% Manager Assistant 85 10% 87 10% City Manager City Manager 93 20% 95 20% \,,, .✓ v .Le..r �� City Council Agenda Report May 9, 2002 (CC Meeting of May 15, 2002) Page 3 While the ranges are proposed to be changed, the new ranges do not result in an increase in salary at this time. Incumbents would be moved to a step on the higher range with the same salary. For example, 74F goes to 75E and 79G goes to 83C. The proposed changes would go into effect in July 2002. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: 1. Approve upgrade of Secretary I to Secretary II position in Assistant City Manager's Office effective May 17, 2002. 2. Direct staff to return with Salary Plan Resolution changes for the June 5 meeting.