Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAGENDA REPORT 2002 0710 CC SPC ITEM 04AITEM yA• }.tit r+fC_ -l0. ( �IPC��rir►c► % —!z AC b ... - �.���? �'nEX rf E . 2oe7- ►�+ MOORPARR CITY COUNCIL � -� lar� Per ..5... _ .._.__._ AGENDA REPORT TO: Honorable City Council FROM: Barry K. Hogan, Community Development Director Prepared By: Joyce Parker - Bozylinski, Planner DATE: July 2, 2002 (CC Meeting of 7/10/02) SUBJECT: Consider General Plan Amendment No. 2002 -01 for a Change in General Plan Designation from General Commercial (C -2) to Very High Density (VH) , Zone Change No. 2002 -01; a Change of Zone Designation from Commercial Planned Development (CPD) to Residential Planned Development 20 du /acre (RPD 20 DU /AC); and a Request for a Residential Planned Development (RPD) permit to Allow the Construction of 190 Senior Citizen Apartment Units on the Application of USA Properties Fund, (Assessor's Parcel No. 512 -0- 050 -185 and a Portion of 506 -0- 050 -475) SUMMARY The Planning Commission on June 24, 2002 held a public hearing and adopted Resolution No. PC- 2002 -426 recommending to the City Council approval of General Plan Amendment No. 2002 -01 to change the land use designation from General Commercial (C -2) to Very High Density (VH), a change of Zone designation from Commercial Planned Development (CPD) to Residential Planned Development 20 dwelling units acre (RPD 20 du /ac) and a request for Residential Planned Development Permit No. 2002 -02 to allow the construction of 190 senior citizen apartment units on a 9.48 acre site located on Park Crest Lane at Park Lane. BACKGROUND In October 2001, the City Council Affordable Housing /Community Development Committee (Mayor Hunter and Councilmember Harper) held a special meeting to consider a General Plan land use designation from Commercial (C -2) to Residential (VH) on the subject property. The Committee considered the application and recommended that the City Council authorize concurrent processing for the application. ,,cT e-�, 4 Honorable City Council Meeting of July 10, 2002 Page No. 2 Concurrent processing allows the applicant to process the legislative changes (General Plan and Zone Map amendments) together with the entitlement permits (RPD permit). On December 12, 2001, the City Council held a public hearing to consider a pre- screen application for the General Plan amendment and authorized the applicant, USA Properties Fund, to submit a General Plan Amendment application. The Council further authorized concurrent processing of all the necessary applications to develop the proposed senior housing project. This project also involves a development agreement (DA), but as of this date, the DA has not been finalized. It is anticipated that the City Council Ad Hoc Committee (Councilmembers Mikos and Harper) will have completed its review of the DA by the scheduled City Council meeting on July 17, 2002. The DA would formalize the requirements for affordability for the project and a reduction in fees of approximately $3,000 per dwelling unit. DISCUSSION The 190 unit senior citizen apartment complex is proposed on a 9.48 site on Park Crest Lane at Park Lane. The eastern half of the site is currently vacant and the western half of the site contains a commercial greenhouse that his been in use for approximately 20 years. All of the proposed units will be affordable senior units. Seniors include any person 55 years of age or older and the current proposal is for 200 of the units to be very low income and 800 of the units to be low income. As a part of the Development Agreement there is tentative approval for 250 of the units to be very low income. For purposes of the project, very low is defined as persons making 500 of the median income and low is defined as persons making 600 of the median income. The units will be deed restricted as affordable for the life of the project. The application includes a request to change the existing General Plan land use designation from C -2 (General Commercial) to VH (Very High) Density Residential. Using a gross acreage of 9.48, the requested density is approximately 20 dwelling units (DU) an acre. The General Plan Land Use Element caps the Very High Residential category at 15 du /acre unless a density bonus is granted. The General Plan also limits density to 20 du /acre when a density bonus is approved pursuant to the State Density Bonus law and Municipal Code provisions. Both of these sources allow for a maximum bonus of twenty -five (250) percent for projects meeting defined criteria. This project, which will be 100% affordable, meets this criteria. S: \Community Development \R P D \2002 -02 \Staff Rpt \cc RPD 2002 -02 USA Roperties Rptl.doc Honorable City Council Meeting of July 10, 2002 Page No. 3 In addition, Municipal Code Section 17.64.030 requires that if a density bonus is granted, at least one incentive shall also be provided, which may include reduction in RPD site development standards. A reduction in the required number of parking stalls has been included in the recommended project and is discussed in more detail later in this report. In addition to a General Plan Amendment, a Zone Change would be required to change the property from CPD (Commercial Planned Development) to RPD -20 du /ac (Residential Planned Development 20 dwelling units per acre). The proposed project site plan depicts 190 units within fourteen (14) two -story buildings arranged around a circular driveway. The project includes 96 one (1) bedroom units and 94 two (2) bedroom units. The proposed units are comprised of flats on each floor, with unit sizes ranging from 579 to 846 square feet. The project consists of four (4) 8 -plex buildings, one (1) 14 -plex building and nine (9) 16 -plex buildings. The buildings are clustered around a central recreation facility containing a pool and spa, recreation building and patio area. The 4,053 square foot recreation building includes a community room, library, laundry room, mail room, and management office. All of the proposed residential buildings are two stories ranging in height from 25 to 27 feet. The recreational building is one - story and 25 ft. 6 inches in height. The proposed architectural style is a California Ranch style consisting of charcoal gray concrete the roofing with brown hardboard or wood siding for all the buildings. The fascia or trim, stairs and hand rails are all wood with a wooden trim band around the building between the first and second floor. Two color schemes are proposed for the project. Scheme A consists of brown wood siding with white trim and green accents. Scheme B consists of a darker brown wood siding and darker white trim with rust accents. Decorative louver shutters are proposed around the primary windows. Colored elevations and a color material board will be available at the City Council hearing. Access to the project is provided via Park Crest Lane and Park Lane. The project will be conditioned to improve Park Lane from Park Crest Lane to Los Angeles Avenue. Any acquisition of right - of -way that cannot be accomplished by the applicant would be acquired by the City with the applicant covering all costs of acquisition. When the City Council first viewed the proposal as part of the pre- screen permit, it requested the applicant to study the possibility S: \Community Development \R P D \2002 -02 \Staff Rpt \cc RPD 2002 -02 USA Roperties Rptl.doc Honorable City Council Meeting of July 10, 2002 Page No. 4 of purchasing the single- family home located directly northwest of the site to provide for an extension of Park Crest Lane to Unidos Avenue. The parcel on which the single- family dwelling is located is commercially zoned. The existence of the single family home and location of the Faith Lutheran Church reduces the potential for a street connection, however two (2) travel lanes could be achieved through a reduced roadway section to avoid the church, but would require removal of the existing single family dwelling. Staff has spoken to the property owner who confirms that he was approached but could not come to agreement upon price. If warranted in the future by traffic studies, this street connection could be required as a condition of development of the commercially zoned site. The applicant is proposing 190 parking spaces (a ratio of 1 space for each unit) which includes 132 carports and 58 uncovered spaces including six (6) handicapped spaces. Parking for the project is proposed at less than zoning ordinance requirements. The parking standards require two (2) covered spaces for each one (1) or more bedroom units in multiple family developments, one (1) of which must be in a garage. RPD standards require an additional .5 spaces per unit for guest parking. The parking standards also allow some reduction in parking for bachelor or studio apartments when an RPD is reviewed (Section 17.32.010.M.1 and Section 17.36.030.B.3) . There are no standards for senior citizen units. Section 17.32.010 allows the community development director to determine the parking requirements for any use not specifically listed, and as noted earlier in the report Section 17.64.030 requires that incentives be provided for qualifying projects. A reduction in parking standards qualifies as an incentive under that section. To assist in that determination a parking study that was submitted by the applicant analyzed five (5) other properties owned by USA Properties Fund. That study found that the maximum parking demand rate (based on the average of the highest day observed at each community) was .68 occupied spaces per occupied dwelling unit with a average parking demand rate of .55 to .77 occupied spaces per dwelling unit. USA Properties Fund has numerous senior projects throughout California. Some of the complexes have a minimum age for seniors of 55 years of age and others have a minimum age for seniors of 62 years of age. Of the five complexes studied, three (3) maintained a minimum age of 62 years and two (2) had a minimum age of 55 years. In addition, staff contacted several California cities including the surrounding cities of Thousand Oaks, Simi Valley and Camarillo to determine their parking standard for senior units. The City of Thousand Oaks makes a determination on a case - by -case basis requiring the applicant to submit a study. Simi Valley and Camarillo require 1 space for every unit. Based on the S: \Community Development \R P D \2002 -02 \Staff Rpt \cc RPD 2002 -02 USA Roperties Rptl.doc 0'1°?. v � v v' Honorable City Council Meeting of July 10, 2002 Page No. 5 study submitted by the applicant and the survey completed by staff, the community development director has determined that one (1) parking space per unit is sufficient for the project, so long as it remains a senior low income project. The project proposes to utilize a six (6) foot high wrought iron (tubular steel) fence along the front and back property lines. Staff has included a condition that requires that block pilasters be added to the wrought iron fence, to the satisfaction of the Community Development Director. Existing block walls and the back of carports for Archstone Apartments will be utilized on the east property line and a new 6 -foot high block wall will be constructed behind the single family homes to the west. Prior to approval of the final wall and fence plan, the Community Development Director shall approve the connection of the west property line wall with existing fences and or walls on the adjacent residential lots. The applicant has indicated that they will approach each of the owners of the single family homes to work with them to determine whether one wall or two walls would be required given the fact that most of the homes have existing rear yard walls. Pedestrian circulation is provided throughout the site and from the parking areas. Staff has added a condition that would require the applicant to submit a more refined pedestrian walking plan with shaded seating areas for review and approval of the Community Development Director. This plan would include the provision of benches and sitting areas for residents to sit and visit or just enjoy the outdoor areas of the project including the adjacent Arroyo Simi. The Planning Commission felt that creating a pleasant outdoor space for the seniors was important. The applicant is proposing community garden areas for use by residents of the project. The community gardens are shown on the Landscape Master Plan between the Arroyo Simi and proposed carports in the southwest corner of the site. The site currently consists of two separate parcels, which will need to be merged with a lot line adjustment or lot merger. The existing greenhouse is on a separate parcel from the adjacent vacant lot. A condition of approval has been added that will require the applicant to merge the two lots or utilize the lot line adjustment process prior to issuance of a Zoning Clearance for a building permit. The project is adjacent to the Ventura County Flood Control District (VCFCD) Arroyo Simi, which is an improved trapezoidal channel with a dirt bottom and rip -rap side slopes. The channel also has concrete drop structures at various locations to stabilize S: \Community Development \R P D \2002 -02 \Staff Rpt \cc RPD 2002 -02 USA Roperties Rptl.doc C V0.�(� y v v Honorable City Council Meeting of July 10, 2002 Page No. 6 the bottom of the channel from erosion. The VCFCD has published an approved hydrologic study report, which reports a peak flow in the Arroyo Simi for the 100 -year event of 26,600 cfs (cubic feet per second). A recent more detailed analysis indicates the peak 100 year event flow is 22,300 cfs. Since this new hydrologic report has not been approved, a study was performed for both cfs flows. As currently designed, the project can meet both cfs flows and the project has been conditioned to be at or above the 100 -year event based upon a 26,600 cfs or to an elevation satisfactory to the City Engineer. In addition, the project will include an approximately 130 -foot wide easement for flood control purposes. A portion of this easement exists, but additional dedication will be required to meet the full width required by Ventura County Flood Control. The developer is coordinating with Flood Control to use this area as a "borrow" site for grading, and will be responsible for providing interim erosion control measures. A future Ventura County Flood Control project (projected for 2005 -2006) will widen and deepen the channel and provide wetland vegetation adjacent to the channel. Overall the Planning Commission felt the project would provide much needed affordable housing for seniors and they felt the project was well designed and would be compatible with the surrounding neighborhood. Planning Commission recommendations for changes to Condition 36, to eliminate a requirement for undergrounding exiting above ground utilities adjacent to the project, and Condition 78 (now Condition 91) to clarify required improvements to Park Lane, were included in the Conditions of Approval. Staffs recommended revisions to conditions, subsequent to the Planning Commission recommendation, are indicated in legislative format. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION A Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) was prepared for the project (Attachment 7). STAFF RECOMMENDATION 1. Open the public hearing, accept public testimony, and close the public hearing. 2. Adopt the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration. 3. Adopt Resolution No. 2002- approving General Plan Amendment No. 2002 -01. S: \Community Development \R P D \2002 -02 \Staff Rpt \cc RPD 2002 -02 USA Roperties Rptl.doc Honorable City Council Meeting of July 10, 2002 Page No. 7 4. Introduce Ordinance No. for first reading approving Zone Change No. 2002 -01. Schedule second reading and adoption for September 4, 2002. 5. Adopt Resolution No. 2002- approving Residential Planned Development No. 2002 -02, subject to conditions of approval. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Planning Commission Staff Report of June 24, 2002 2. Planning Commission Resolution No. PC- 2002 -426. With Recommended Conditions of Approval 3. Project Exhibits A. Site Plan & Illustrative Site Plan B. Grading /Drainage Plan C. Landscape Plan D. Floor Plans & Elevations 4. Draft City Council Resolution Approving General Plan Amendment No. 2002 -01. 5. Draft Ordinance approving Zone Change No. 2002 -01. 6. Draft City Council Resolution Approving Residential Planned Development No. 2002 -02. 7. Mitigated Negative Declaration LARGE SCALE DRAWINGS UNDER SEPARATE COVER S: \Community Development \R P D \2002 -02 \Staff Rpt \cc RPD 2002 -02 USA Roperties Rptl.doc ,Y ,r. e", r") City of Moorpark meeting Community Development Department �j a� � n Staff Report PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING DATE: June 24,2002 D� ?oo�' AGENDA ITEM NO. : 8 B AGENDA REPORT PREPARED BY: Joyce Parker- Bozylinski Planner and Barry R. Hogan, Director of Community Developme ~` ^- Residential Planned Development Permit, IRPD 2002 -02 General Plan Amendment and Zone _Change to (GPA 2002 -01 allow 190 unit senior citizen apartment IZC 2002 -01 complex on a 9.48 acre site. lAPN 506 -0- 050 -185 and a portion of 506 -0- 050 -475 ICEQA Mitigated Negative Declaration I- 1 - !APPLICANT: USA Properties Fund Proposal: A request for change in General Plan designation from General Commercial (C -2) to Very High Density (VH), a change of Zone designation from Commercial Planned Development (CPD) to Residential Planned Development (RPD) and a request for a RPD permit to allow the construction of 190 senior citizen apartment units on a 9.48 acre site. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT: A Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) was prepared for the project. LOCATION: Located on Park Crest Lane at Park Lane, City of Moorparx. —^ i SITE MAP � � tg V 4.1. IlAIL0.0P0 H16M ST. LOS 1 > fo AVE. v L05 NJGSL64 AVE 1 SITE 'ro4o RECOMMENDATION SUMMARY: Recommend to the uizy Council apprvvui -- the General Plan Amendment and Zone Change and approval of the RPD with conditions. CC ATTACHMENT Planning Commission Staff Report RPD 2002 -02 June 24, 2002 Applicant: USA Properties Fund Page No. 2 BACKGROUND In October 2001, the City Council Affordable Housing /Community Development Committee (Mayor Hunter and Councilmember Harper) held a special meeting to consider a General Plan land use designation from Commercial (C -2) to Residential (VH) on the subject property. The Committee considered the application and recommended that the City Council authorize concurrent processing for the application. Concurrent processing allows the applicant to process the legislative changes (General Plan and Zone Map amendments) together with the entitlement permits (RPD permit). On December 12, 2001, the City Council held a pubic hearing to consider a pre- screen application for the General Plan amendment and authorized the applicant, USA Properties Fund, to submit a General Plan Amendment application. The Council further authorized concurrent processing of all the necessary applications to develop the proposed senior housing project. At the pre- screen application hearing, the City Council directed the applicant to study the possibility of providing a connection between Park Crest Lane and Unidos Avenue to create a through street from Moorpark to Leta Yancy Road. This item is discussed further in the staff report. A Planned Development Permit requires a discretionary decision to authorize development and use on a site. Chapter 17.36.010 establishes standards for residential planned develop zones and Chapter 17.32 of the Municipal Code establishes standards for parking, access and landscaping. The application includes a request for a General Plan Amendment and Zone Change to change the existing land use designation and zoning on the property. The Planning Commission is an advisory body with respect to general plan amendments and zone changes. Planning Commission action on these applications will be in the form of a recommendation to the City Council. This project will also involve a development agreement (DA), but as of this date, the DA has not been finalized. It is anticipated that the City Council Ad Hoc Committee (Councilmembers Mikos and Harper) will have completed its review of the DA by the scheduled City Council meeting on July 17, 2002. The DA would formalize the requirements for affordability for the project and a reduction in fees of approximately $3,000 per dwelling unit. S: \Community Development \R P D \2002 -02 \Staff Rpt \pc 020624 RPD 2002 -02 USA Roperties Rpt.doc C v sje Planning Commission Staff Report RPD 2002 -02 June 24, 2002 Applicant: USA Properties Fund Page No. 3 LAND USE DESIGNATION /ZONING /ADJACENT LAND USE Direction General Plan Zoninq Land Use Site: North C -2 CPD Single Family Dwelling & Undeveloped Land South NA NA Arroyo Simi East VH RPD Archstone Apartments West H RPD 7u Single Family Dwellings Definitions: C -2 (General Commercial), CPD (Commercial Planned Development), H (High Density) , VH (Very High Density)and RPD(Residential Planned Development). DISCUSSION The 190 unit senior citizen apartment complex is proposed on a 9.48 site on Park Crest Lane at Park Lane. The eastern half of the site is currently vacant and the western half of the site contains a commercial greenhouse that his been in use for approximately 20 years. All of the proposed units will be affordable senior units. Seniors include any person 55 years of age or older and the current proposal is for 20% of the units to be very low income and 80% of the units to be low income. As a part of the Development Agreement there is tentative approval for 25% of the units to be very low income. For purposes of the project, very low is defined as persons making 50% of the median income and low is defined as persons making 60% of the median income. The units will be deed restricted as affordable for 30 years. General Plan Amendment and Zone Change The application includes a request to change the existing General Plan land use designation from C -2 (General Commercial) to VH (Very High) Density Residential. Using a gross acreage of 9.48, the requested density is approximately 20 dwelling units (DU) an acre. The General Plan Land Use Element caps the Very High Residential category at 15 du /acre unless a density bonus is granted. The General Plan also limits density to 20 du /acre when a density bonus is approved pursuant to the State Density Bonus law and Municipal Code provisions. Both of these sources allow for a maximum bonus of twenty -five (25 %) percent for projects meeting defined criteria. This project, which will be 100% affordable, meets this criteria. S: \Community Development \R P D \2002 -02 \Staff Rpt \pc 020624 RPD 2002 -02 USA Roperties Rpt.doc ��'�� Planning Commission Staff Report RPD 2002 -02 June 24, 2002 Applicant: USA Properties Fund Page No. 4 In addition to a General Plan Amendment, a Zone Change would be required to change the property from CPD(Commercial Planned Development) to RPD -20 (Residential Planned Development 20 dwelling units per acre). Residential Planned Development Site Plan The proposed project site plan depicts 190 units within fourteen (14) two -story buildings arranged around a circular driveway. The project includes 96 one (1) bedroom units and 94 two (2) bedroom units. The proposed units are comprised of flats on each floor, with unit sizes ranging from 579 to 846 square feet. The project consists of four (4) 8 -plex buildings, one (1) 14 -plex building and nine (9) 16 -plex buildings. The buildings are clustered around a central recreation facility containing a pool and spa, recreation building and patio area. The 4,053 square foot recreation building includes a community room, library, laundry room, mail room, and management office. Setbacks The RPD zone establishes setbacks for market -rate, single family residential projects and market -rate multifamily projects but specifies that these setback standards can be modified by the Planning Commission or City Council as part of the RPD permit. The following chart specifies the minimum setbacks for market rate multifamily: Required Proposed Front 20 ft. minimum 20 ft. minimum Interior Side 10 ft. minimum 10 ft. minimum Street Side 20 ft. for non arterial street 20 ft. minimum Rear As determined by RPD Permit 9.84 minimum The distance between the proposed buildings range from 15 feet to 20 feet. Architectural Style All of the proposed residential buildings are two stories ranging in height from 25 to 27 feet. The recreational building is one - story and 25 ft. 6 inches in height. The proposed architectural style is a modified Cape Cod style consisting of charcoal gray concrete tile roofing with brown hardboard or wood siding for all the buildings. The fascia or trim, stairs and hand rails are all wood with a wooden trim band around the building between the first S: \Community Development \R P D \2002 -02 \Staff Rpt \pc 020624 RPD 2002 -02 USA Roperties Rpt.doc Planning Commission Staff Report RPD 2002 -02 June 24, 2002 Applicant: USA Properties Fund Page No. 5 and second floor. Two color schemes are proposed for the project. Scheme A consists of brown wood siding with white trim and green accents. Scheme B consists of a darker brown wood siding and darker white trim with rust accents. Decorative louver shutters are proposed around the primary windows. Colored elevations and a color material board will be available at the Commission hearing. There are four building types proposed for the project. Building Type 1 (7 buildings) are 16 -plex buildings which currently include unit entrances on both sides of the building in addition to unit entrances located at each end of the building. Building Type 1 shall be redesigned to provide consistent with the entry landings of the other building types. Building Type 2 (2 buildings) are 16- plex buildings and include the unit entrances on both sides of the building but do not incorporate unit entries on the ends of the buildings. Building Type 3 (4 buildings) are the smaller 8 -plex buildings which include all two (2) bedroom units that are accessed from the center of the building on both sides. The last building type, Building Type 4, is utilized for one 14 -plex building on the site. This building has unit entrances on both sides of the building and on one end of the building. Building Type 4 also incorporates a one story element at the end of the building. In addition to the differences relative to unit entry, each of the four building types is different architecturally in terms of roof elements and building projections. Circulation and - Parking Access to the project is provided via Park Crest Lane and Park Lane. The project will be conditioned to improve Park Lane from Park Crest Lane to Los Angeles Avenue. Any acquisition of right - of -way that cannot be accomplished by the applicant would be acquired by the City with the applicant covering all costs of acquisition. Entrance to the project is via an entry drive divided into two one way entrance and exit lanes separated by a 20 foot wide landscape planter. The project will be controlled with a six (6) foot high wrought iron (tubular steel) electronically activated gate, an elevation of which is shown on the Landscape Master Plan. A condition has been added to the project requiring enhanced paving at the entry drive. A 25 foot wide circular drive aisle provides access to the parking located around the site. When the City Council first viewed the proposal as part of the pre- screen permit, it requested the applicant to study the possibility of purchasing the single - family home located directly northwest of the site to provide for an extension of Park Crest Lane to Unidos S: \Community Development \R P D \2002 -02 \Staff Rpt \pc 020624 RPD 2002 -02 USA Roperties Rpt.doc Planning Commission Staff Report RPD 2002 -02 June 24, 2002 Applicant: USA Properties Fund Page No. 6 Avenue. The parcel on which the single - family dwelling is located is commercially zoned. The existence of the single family home and location of the Faith Lutheran Church reduces the potential for a street connection, however two (2) travel lanes could be achieved through a reduced roadway section to avoid the church, but would require removal of the existing single family dwelling. Staff has spoken to the property owner who confirms that he was approached but could not come to agreement upon price. If warranted in the future by traffic studies, this street connection could be required as a condition of development of the commercially zoned site. The applicant is proposing 190 parking spaces (a ratio of 1 space for each unit) which includes 132 carports and 58 uncovered spaces including six (6) handicapped spaces. The design of the proposed carports consists of a flat roofed structure supported by posts as shown on the attached carport plan. Landscape planter areas have been incorporated into the plan between the carports to provide visual relief. Parking for the project is proposed at less than zoning ordinance requirements. The parking standards require two (2) covered spaces for each one (1) or more bedroom units in multiple family developments, one (1) of which must be in a garage. RPD standards require an additional .5 spaces per unit for guest parking. The parking standards also allow some reduction in parking for bachelor or studio apartments when an RPD is reviewed (Section 17.32.010.M.1 and Section 17. 36. 030. B. 3) . There are no standards for senior citizen units. Section 17.32.010 allows the community development director to determine the parking requirements for any use not specifically listed. To assist in that determination a parking study that was submitted by the applicant analyzed five (5) other properties owned by USA Properties Fund. That study found that the maximum parking demand rate (based on the average of the highest day observed at each community) was .68 occupied spaces per occupied dwelling unit with a average parking demand rate of .55 to .77 occupied spaces per dwelling unit. USA Properties Fund has numerous senior projects throughout California. Some of the complexes have a minimum age for seniors of 55 years of age and others have a minimum age for seniors of 62 years of age. Of the five complexes studied, three (3) maintained a minimum age of 62 years and two (2) had a minimum age of 55 years. In addition, staff contacted the surrounding cities of Thousand Oaks, Simi Valley and Camarillo to determine their parking standard for senior units. The City of Thousand Oaks makes a determination on a case -by -case basis requiring the applicant to submit a study. Simi Valley and Camarillo require 1 space for every unit. Camarillo permits only 50% of the required spaces to be improved with the remaining area to be landscaped or used for recreation purposes. A covenant is recorded on the land S: \Community Development \R P D \2002 -02 \Staff Rpt \pc 020624 RPD 2002 -02 USA Roperties Rpt.doc v ,... Planning Commission Staff Report RPD 2002 -02 June 24, 2002 Applicant: USA Properties Fund Page No. 7 that requires the owner to develop additional spaces if required should the use change to a conventional apartment project. Other cities contacted included Santa Maria (1 space for units over 600 square feet and 1 for staff) and Bakersfield (1 space for every 2 units). Staff believes that some modification of the current parking standard is reasonable, since many seniors do not maintain two (2) cars. Based on the study submitted by the applicant and the survey completed by staff, the community development director has determined that one (1) parking space per unit is sufficient for the project, so long as it remains a senior low income project. Landscaping, Fencing /Walls, and NPDES The project proposes to utilize a six (6) foot high wrought iron (tubular steel) fence along the front property line. This fence will be located behind the required 20 foot wide landscape setback. This landscape setback consists of a 2:1 slope that slopes up from the sidewalk and /or adjacent property to the project with the wrought fence located at the top of the slope. Cross section (D -D and E -E) depicting this feature is located on the preliminary Grading /Drainage Plan. Existing block walls and the back of carports for Archstone Apartments will be utilized on the east property line (Section F -F on the Grading/ Drainage Plan) with a wrought iron fence proposed along the Arroyo Simi (Section G -G on the Grading /Drainage Plan). A new 6 foot high block wall (Section C -C on the Grading/ Drainage Plan) will be constructed behind the single family homes to the west. Prior to approval of the final wall and fence plan, the Community Development Director shall approve the connection of the west property line wall with existing fences and or walls on the adjacent residential lots. The applicant has indicated that they will approach each of the owners of the single family homes to work with them to determine whether one wall or two walls would be required given the fact that most of the homes have existing rear yard walls. As shown on the Site Plan and Grading /Drainage Plan several areas in the project are proposed as biofiltration areas. The NPDES permit requires that the "first flush" of storm water run -off be treated before being released into the pubic storm drains. In order to meet this requirement, surface storm runoff will be directed to these biofiltration areas. These areas are shown on the landscape plan as turf areas. A detail of the biofiltration area proposed along the western project boundary adjacent to the single family homes is shown on the Grading /Drainage Plan in Cross Section A -A. In this area, trees will be planted on the bank of the slope, which will help screen the project from the adjacent single family homes. S: \Community Development \R P D \2002 -02 \Staff Rpt \pc 020624 RPD 2002 -02 USA Roperties Rpt.doc Planning Commission Staff Report RPD 2002 -02 June 24, 2002 Applicant: USA Properties Fund Page No. 8 Pedestrian circulation is provided throughout the site and from the parking areas. Staff has added a condition that would require the applicant to submit a more refined pedestrian walking plan with shaded seating areas for review and approval of the Community Development Director. This plan would include the provision of benches and sitting areas for residents to sit and visit or just enjoy the outdoor areas of the project including the adjacent Arroyo Simi. The applicant is proposing community garden areas for use by residents of the project. The community gardens are shown on the Landscape Master Plan between the Arroyo Simi and proposed carports in the southwest corner of the site. The City requires a valuation study be completed on all mature trees located on a site. The Tree Valuation Report completed for this project indicates that the site contains one (1) California Pepper tree located in the center of the property. The total valuation of the tree is $10,133. The project has been conditioned to provide enhanced landscaping that totals the amount of the estimated tree impact pursuant to Municipal Code requirements since the required grading would make it infeasible to leave the tree in place. Engineering The site currently consists of two separate parcels, which will need to be merged with a lot line adjustment or lot merger. The existing greenhouse is on a separate parcel from the adjacent vacant lot. A condition of approval has been added that will require the applicant to merge the two lots or utilize the lot line adjustment process prior to issuance of a Zoning Clearance for a building permit. Commulative traffic impacts from this project will effect the Level of Service at the intersections of Los Angeles Avenue /Moorpark Avenue, Los Angeles Avenue /Spring Road and Spring Road /High Street. The project has been conditioned to pay a pro -rata fair share of improvements to those intersections. The fair share for this project is based upon the traffic analysis prepared for the Archstone Apartment project at a sixty percent (60 %) value. The project is adjacent to the Ventura County Flood Control District ( VCFCD) Arroyo Simi, which is an improved trapezoidal channel with a dirt bottom and rip -rap side slopes. The channel also has concrete drop structures at various locations to stabilize the bottom of the channel from erosion. The VCFCD has published an approved hydrologic study report, which reports a peak flow in the Arroyo Simi for the 100 -year event of 26,600 cfs (cubic feet per second). A recent more detailed analysis indicates the peak 100 year event flow is 22,300 cfs. Since this new hydrologic report S: \Community Development \R P D \2002 -02 \Staff Rpt \pc 020624 RPD 2002 -02 USA Roperties Rpt.doc Planning Commission Staff Report RPD 2002 -02 June 24, 2002 Applicant: USA Properties Fund Page No. 9 has not been approved, a study was performed for both cfs flows. As currently designed, the project can meet both cfs flows and the project has been conditioned to be at or above the 100 -year event based upon a 26,600 cfs or to an elevation satisfactory to the City Engineer. In addition, the project includes a 120 foot wide easement for flood control purposes. This easement will include wetlands and landscaping within the area adjacent to the project. AGENCY REVIEW All requested conditions of approval from Agencies and-Departments that have reviewed the Residential Planned Development, General Plan Amendment and Zone Change have been incorporated into the Conditions of Approval for this project. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION A Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) was prepared for the project and is attached for Commission review. The required 21 day MND circulation period began on June 14, 2002 and ends on July 8, 2002. Since the City Council will be the final decision making body for both the legislative and entitlement requests, the Planning Commission's action on the Mitigated Negative Declaration will be in the form of a recommendation to the City Council which is scheduled to hear the project on July 10, 2002. The MND prepared for the project identified four environmental impacts that required mitigation to lessen the impacts to less than significant. These impacts, which include liquefaction, cumulative traffic, flooding and radon, can all be mitigated to less than significant impacts as outlined in the MND. Additionally, further research on the radon impact, conducted after the completion of the MND, found a study conducted by the Indoor Air Quality Program of the California Department of Health Services entitled "Survey of Residential Radon Levels In Ventura County and Northwestern Los Angeles County ", June, 1991. This study includes Moorpark in the low average potential radon concentrations (1.28 pci /1) as opposed to above 4 pico Curies per liter identified in the MND. The final MND will need to be amended to reflect this new information and eliminate the mitigation measures, as the impact will now be less than significant without mitigation. STAFF RECOMMENDATION 1. Open the public hearing, accept public testimony, and close the public hearing. S: \Community Development \R P D \2002 -02 \Staff Rpt \pc 020624 RPD 2002 -02 USA Roperties Rpt.doc Planning Commission Staff Report RPD 2002 -02 June 24, 2002 Applicant: USA Properties Fund Page No. 10 2. Consider the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration to ensure that it adequately addresses the impacts of the proposed residential project prior to making a recommendation. 3. Adopt.Resolution No. PC -2002- recommending to the City Council approval of General Plan Amendment No. 2002 -01, Zone Change No. 2002 -01 and Residential Planned Development No. 2002 -02, subject to conditions of approval. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Zoning Map ATTACHED 2. General Plan Map ATTACHED 3. Project Exhibits SEE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT ATTACHMENTS A. Site Plan & Illustrative Site Plan B. Grading /Drainage Plan C. Landscape Plan D. Floor Plans & Elevations 4. Carport Design ATTACHED 5. Traffic and Parking Study ON FILE IN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPT. 6. Mitigated Negative Declaration SEE CC AGENDA REPORT ATTACHMENTS 7. Draft Resolution with Conditions of Approval SEE CC ATTACHMENT 2 S: \Community Development \R P D \2002 -02 \Staff Rpt \pc 020624 RPD 2002 -02 USA Ropecties Rpt.doc C GENERAL PLAN MAP PC ATTACHMENT 1 C,� fm 'yt1 son Igo I a ttt]:I:�1Itt!_ :-'tNNll�i: - �illlllll {l., ALA nr+■is� �iri�fll���t •� Mi. g-.,, „ �'lilillu fL .� U _ L7;W f. ,'1•Ly '13 .fit JfA i � r a � Li r i�l�issll �.i CILF °I: 11 J S �l�31L' �.. OR �ML.Jjp ov! t *1 �. t�n»uitu, unroof?! I M• mait - if 1111 ��,- ,viJ11 TYPICAL CARPORT USA PROPERTIES VINTAGE CREST SENIOR APARTMENTS FUND, INC. MOORPARK, CA PC ATTACHMENT 4 F �1 { y 'L ua.o • ua. RESOLUTION NO. PC- 2002 -426 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL OF GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 2002 -01, ZONE CHANGE NO. 2002 -01, AND RESIDENTIAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 2002 -02 FOR A 9.48 ACRE SITE LOCATED ON PARK CREST LANE AT PARK LANE, ON THE APPLICATION OF USA PROPERTIES FUND ASSESSOR PARCEL NO. 512 -0- 050 -185 AND A PORTION OF 506 -0- 050 -475 - WHEREAS, at a duly noticed Public Hearing on June 24, 2002, the Planning Commission considered General Plan Amendment No. 2002 -01, Zone Change No. 2002 -01, and Residential Planned Development Permit No. 2002 -02 on the application of USA Properties Fund for a 9.48 acre site located on Park Crest Lane at Park Lane (Assessor Parcel No. 506 -0 -5- 050 -185 and a portion of 506 -0- 050 -475); and WHEREAS, the proposed project is more specifically described as follows: General Plan Amendment No. 2002 -01: A request for a change in the Land Use Designation of the Land Use Element of the General Plan from C -2 (General Commercial) to VHD (Very High Density); Zone Change No. 2002 -01: A request for a change in the Zoning from CPD (Commercial Planned Development) to RPD -20 du /ac (Residential Planned Development 20 dwelling units /acre); Residential Planned Development Permit No. 2002 -02: a request for a permit to allow the construction of 190 senior citizen apartment units; and WHEREAS, at its meeting of June 24, 2002, the Planning Commission conducted a public hearing and received public testimony, and after receiving public testimony, the Planning Commission closed the public hearing. S: \Community Development \R P D \2002 -02 \Resolutions Conditions \reso pc 2002 -426 gpa zc rpd usa.doc Modified: 07/01/02 CC ATTACHMENT Resolution No. PC- 2002 -426 GPA 2002 -01, ZC 2002 -01, RPD No. 2002 -02 Page 2 NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE _CITY OF MOORPARK, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. GENERAL PLAN AND ZONING CONSISTENCY: The Planning Commission does hereby find that General Plan Amendment No. 2002 -01, Zone Change 2002 -01 and Residential Planned Development Permit No. 2002 -02 are consistent with the City's General Plan, subject to amendment of the land use designation as proposed. SECTION 2. ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTATION: A. That the Mitigated Negative Declaration prepared for General Plan Amendment No. 2002 -01, Zone Change 2002 -01 and Residential Planned Development Permit No. 2002 -02 serves as the environmental document for the General Plan Amendment, Zone Change, and Residential Planned Development Permit. B. In order to reduce the potential adverse impacts of this project, mitigation measures discussed in the Mitigated Negative Declaration have been incorporated as conditions of approval of Residential Planned Development Permit No. 2002 -02. C. A Mitigation Reporting and Monitoring Program prepared in compliance with Assembly Bill 3180 and considered in the various decisions regarding these projects applies to Residential Planned Development Permit No. 2002 -02. D. The Planning Commission recommends to the City Council the adoption of the Mitigated Negative Declaration. SECTION 3. RESIDENTIAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMIT FINDINGS: The Planning Commission finds that: A. The proposed project is consistent with the intent and provisions of the City's General Plan and Zoning Ordinance. B. The proposed project is compatible with the character of surrounding development. .l.� z , �� Resolution No. PC- 2002 -426 GPA 2002 -01, ZC 2002 -01, RPD No. 2002 -02 Page 3 C. The proposed project would not be obnoxious or harmful, or impair the utility of neighboring property or uses. D. The proposed project would not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience, or welfare. E. The proposed project is compatible with existing and planned land uses in the general area where the development is to be located. F. The proposed project is compatible with the scale, visual character and design of the surrounding properties, designed so as to enhance the physical and visual quality of the community, and the structure(s) have design features which provide visual relief and separation between land uses of conflicting character. G. The residential structure setbacks are appropriate for an infill residential project that includes affordable housing. SECTION 4. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Commission recommends to the City Council approval of General Plan Amendment No. 2002 -01 (Exhibit A), Zone Change 2002 -01 (Exhibit B), and Residential Planned Development Permit No. 2002 -02 subject to the Conditions of Approval (Exhibit C). SECTION 5. FILING OF RESOLUTION: The Community Development Director shall certify to the adoption of this resolution and shall cause a certified resolution to be filed in the book of original resolutions. Resolution No. PC- 2002 -426 GPA 2002 -01, ZC 2002 -01, RPD No. 2002 -02 Page 4 The action of the foregoing direction approved by the following vote: AYES: Commissioners Parvin, DiCecco, Haller and Vice Chair Landis NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: PASSED AND ADOPTED THIS 24TH DAY OF JUNE 2002. William F. Otto, Chair ATTEST: Barry K. Hogan Community Development Director EXHIBITS: A. General Plan Exhibit Map B. Zone Change Exhibit Map C. Conditions of Approval for Residential Planned Development Permit No. 2002 -02. ,- `� Resolution No. PC- 2002 -426 GPA 2002 -01,ZC 2002 -01, RPD No. 2001 -02 Page 7 EXHIBIT C CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR RESIDENTIAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 2002 -02 SEE DRAFT CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION FOR CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL S: \Community Development \R P D \2002 -02 \Resolutions Conditions \exhibit.doc Modified: 07/01/02 I EXIS71NG APARTMENTS / 23• S"WAU( PARCEL B, PARCEL NO. 3115 (ARCHSTONE COMMUNITIES) EASEMENT Loa — C it 1 - I I.rE.-i L . yfNNoc, � FCpq.; I i _ J t -1 �.- ' L_ J s' goEwA EASEMENT tX .1 .•\' 1 i l_1. `� ..... � it ® ` _. w^ ® v .... ® ..�� `-`v � 1,��/ �. _ � ,�/ 4.. , -.. �� 1 ...- ....- ',' : is ..� -a lJ. _J J ..S.l -.�1 j1 ~_•`` --------- �- -�� - - T - - - - -- ..... -. - - - -- _ .. T, n t / • / > ► j C ! 1+,r �r nn 1 - ! y _ , psi _ a e .Ia'r_1 4 EXISTING SINGLE - _ FAMILY DWELLING 1 .1 IT- 1 L TYPE 1 16 -PLEX 19D/IBA 213D/IBA 1__I I__1 1_, 1_1 TYPE 2 16 -PLEX 1BD /1BA 2BD /18A EXISTING[ TRACT NO.I 4117 GRAPHIC SCALE 1 "= 100' i 0 100 200 300 4C Lj RECREATION BUILDING M ra n &l���rm r4�rrr�a>r r•� dr+� • M f1� nlnarllr a1i w,w INOAte um us �/a11rw In TYPE 3 TYPE 4 B —PLEX 14 —PLEX 2BO/28A 1BD /iBA LEGEND 28D/18A Lj RECREATION BUILDING M ra n &l���rm r4�rrr�a>r r•� dr+� • M f1� nlnarllr a1i w,w INOAte um us �/a11rw In C) n H H C) x 3 til z H -i.1 SITE DATAr UNITS. 96 11R/I1A UNI' 70 21R/I1A UN' 24 211V21A UNI' 190 UNITS TOTS ACCESSORY SURAINC RECREATION NU MAINTENANCE DENSITY: 190 UNITS16.7S PARKING: MINIMUM: STANDARD OPEN SPACE - 9111' STANDARD COVERED SPACE . 10':19' HANDICAMED PARKING SPACE - 14'.19' PROVIDED: STANDARD OPEN . SS SPACES STANDARD COVERED 152 SPACES HANDICAPPED 6 SPACES PARKING RATIO: 1901190 . 1.0 SPACES/UNIT I USA PROPERTIES FUND, INC. NORTH ILLUSTRATIVE SITE PLAN • MOORPARK SENIOR OPTS YJ MOORPARK, CA Im 2101tl 4.119f EXISTING APARTMENTS a EASEMENT PARCEL B. PARCEL NO. 3118 (ARCHSTONE COMMUNITIES) s Tl 3r UP -4 �—sw 1w \Olt" D * L::�4 0. 49 1 ,ate fr mal C '77 7. 77, ji -17 CL Tr $11111AN V is it aim n C) 4 7 %L f� ;Kw, (� jas,nNG SINGLE WILY OVOELLL40 rC 7, 4.1 Ell, 1; L 60 CO 13 --j Ji ca u EXISTING TRACT No 4147 opw z PHIC SCALE 1 = 100' 0 100 200 300 400 -J L.- L-9 Nor Mu. awn" •Rim" oft 1w -IL 11"M ftM A� 3iff 4-p-11 oroe&. $4 06OW Y. .w-mmmmjffmLrwwL TYPE 1 TYPE 2 TYPE 3 TYPE 4 X im PRIMOVAT NVAMARAKNIIE PLM 16—PLEX 16—PLEX 8—PLEX 4—PLEX RECREATION pwim � IBD/IBA IBD/18A 2BD/2BA IBD/IBA BUILDING 280/19A 2BD/lBA LEGEND 2BD/1BA tww Pm WNW w MIS , IYV .-A 1I iII ;p .01 0 zm IYV .-A w C) C) H H C� x z H io I INIT A W! SINGLE STORY, HLM, TYI'I J USA PROPERTIES FUND, INC. UNIT W @ SECOND FLOOR A 2 BR 720 S.F. MOORPARK SENIOR APTS MOORPARK, CA UNIT *A'@ FIRST FLOOR RECEIVEI" ;P I; 0 9 2002 Gov .3; b1uu:;ix JE USA PROPERTIES FUND, INC. UNIT -B- 0 SBCOND FLOOR B I BR 579 S.F. UNIT "B* 0 FIRST FLOOR MOORPARK SENIOR APTS MOOPPARK, CA R E C E I V F r, 9 200^ C 2 4 F, yZ USA PROPERTIES FUND, INC. UNIT'C"O 3RCOND FLOOR 41 C 2 BR, 2 BA 846 S.F. 1. 1.. KIT BA A 2 MBR a. LIV BR 2 DECK UNIT -C- 0 FIRST FLOOR MOORPARK SENIOR APTS MOORPARK, CA o 2 4 0 J!Z USA PROPERTIES FUND, INC. SECOND FLOOR BUILDING TYPE 1 MOORPARK SENIOR APTS MOORPARK, CA FIRST FLOOR RE_C -Ei - O 4 D I! jbz 9 llrY F! -0Y Syr _ Y 4 `( it 'k� I -I USA PROPERTIES FUND, INC. i)R I T -I- '�' II¢ f I Clyy I�Il1'II 1�I�1, •t ( . N I � B. 1 t �s 71 �1 "1 II 11 ,{�' n'R "l'lll: I (iL lLL 11 II III I l J - X911 y 111' Y . L. ICI '�.I - III 11X41.11 11:: llllli IIII ,�lI�.�) WI - '4' IT(TT1= [iTITTllTtl I� IIIMIII'1.111 II I�'� ` .. Ij�W , II�II IJ I!III II' f llll lllli'.��1 1 '!51'i 1• IC_¢ 1 Irl I'lll� i1011n I'JII _ M�V[L- L' -_Lpll . 001 IILl17L lii'I�.LI ;IL. 'JAI J I IPN1111��1 W,i�ll J'L nl • I N IfG�du lJ Lly( t - _ r IL'�' IIr, 17111UI ! Afti'Y; 1L Li '� - _. I III :, ! I III11r,'W LIII ) I ➢IIIVIE III 1 1 •'� —1n1 _ I rI�I�'!I Ii =. �ill Mimi- 2 .. i� - •� I i I', I 'II It /l' .1 I ■, dWp - - I� I', Il_ ., _- �'Ip •AIF� _ •) !1�= I 1 iilu i...i, .. � ��.. I � �• .:tl _ �.iw. i. I ®m FRONT ELEVATION 1 uR Ali= ilii11� � .... -4 _�W '.I I J lJl1 ,Tlt J 1, I '. .: I JNI. 1' UI'II 'I �IItIII( t�l' TI' � � i II III11 �I �I 1 i,. II III 171 � 11 2 BR SIDE ELEVATION z BR BUILDING TYPE I - MOORPARK SENIOR APTS MOORPARK, CA 2 OR I Rd,* YI,,I'R1" Iv RI I "1' 111.1 RUI IFIII 11 AItI tl) 11t1) V II)IN( W N I NP, :•I -t,i N(SdWN ), W(IN I f AS(IA A 2X WtX)I)HAR('1 ti l I .ti t W N\ W'fN)I7 (()RN1�.R 7'Nlht I AN N'..X41NN)it@WINIXIW 'RIM. <I':'�A W N W(X)f) S I AIRS R RAIL S %N'J'ifiAW'("N(kF11 IRI 41)' 11 \,�WNl X III OU II IX)KI RS 11111 INIM: R11 WN Xb VII(Tf('ll 4 I IAII -NAI. I RIM ILLSAWN'XX I R 11(:lON 1 AL'I RIM.& it A RI,)ROAV I I ': H 10,, 1A, -1 1 XIN)SIIRI f 'XI11f1LIM11AND 'A l0I SPLPI 1 01IN ER Silt 111k -- I(INF. VI:,NL LN tit ..r 2 4 s n �L rlmm tiro+ S USA PROPERTIES FUND, INC. SECOND FLOOR BUILDING TYPE 2 MOORPARK SENIOR APTS MOORPARK, CA FIRST FLOOR R ECE IV F r, ilill 0 9 2002 JL USA PROPERTIES FUND, INC. \ 1 I FIR 1 BR I FIR I NR 1 OR 1 FIR FRONT I BR I Pk 1 FIR I FIR I UR I FIR SIDI� BUILDING TYPE 2 F\TIIRION MA'I I;PIMI S I CONCRI-1'1. 'I'll 1- P(R)1'IN(i ? IIANI/110AKI) SUNNI; WX' I XPIISIIRF 1 RFSAWN JX WIY)U FASCIA 1 RFSAWN 2.\ WWI) HARGE KIiSAW IN 'X W(NA) COMM TRIM G RFSAWN 2\d,IRR)R &WINIX)W TRIM . RP.SAN N W(K)FINFAIRS& RAILS WIPRRCAST (Y)NCRITF TRFAUS F, MSAWN L\I(I OI IT11AXWF.RS G,AHI.FTRIM. RI ;SAWN ?XL MRTICALA I IIA( it INAI '1'111M, RIiCAKT/ 2XR III N(1 /.0N I AI.'PRIM A IIARMIIIARO ML)INIi !u. ? \"I RIM NANO :.' WIOI' SI'1.1'I I W\' I':R.YPITTER �I(INf. `'? 2ipJi MOORPARK SENIOR APTS - -- - - -- -- MOORPARK, CA yZ A.tl 4101 USA PROPERTIES t FUND, INC. 1 ._J SECOND FLOOR FIRST FLOOR BUILDING TYPE 3 MOORPARK SENIOR APTS MOORPARK, CA f ;EIVED O 4 D P„ E; 9 2002 yz i1M0 410f 2 BR 2 BR FRONT & REAR ELEVATION t Ii IIAO -lK MATTKIALS / 1 I ( OPJ('RFTF TILE. ROOFING 11ARDB(MRD SIDING W18" UXPOSLRI'. I RhSAWN 2X W(X)D FASCIA 4 RGSAWN 2X WOOUBAR(iE i •I _ S RESAWN 2X WOOD CORNER TRIM NLSAWN 2X4 LDX1R RS&RAI TRIM L ) I. ..... , SAWN WOOD STAIRS 6 RAILS T� ( � � l _ "" 11!/PKFi('AST ('f)NCkETE TREADS n. KESAWI46XIU O1ITLOOKI 1( J I ' •7. t_ _ tI� T��I�.rj. '�. t7.ABLf. 1R IM. RESAWN 2X6 VERI ICAL & ., DIA(K)NAL TRIM. RESAWN 21111 110KIlON I',LL fRIM, &DAKUNOARD SIDING __._ S, .�, _. �. _ ._ ... ___ — �.• 9 U yep'' �y N 4 LXPIISIIRI'. KIM BAN[) T Wfl )E SPLI) 1.1111" .R.SH1 77F It Zy..�01• _ _.. ® � � © .._ 7� y)�Y"t`ll �'�•%4'�I I_ �Ir IIJI��'I:NI�.h:K cz a'nJ • Y 2 BR ❑R SIDE ELL .v.ATION = BUILDING TYPE 3 USA PROPERTIES -- MOO RPA RK SENIOR APTS __ ___ __ _ -- ___ -- yZ FUND, INC. MOORPARK, CA IIgN ♦Ip 'I f .3 USA PROPERTIES FUND, INC. L `Ca SECOND FLOOR BUILDING TYPE 4 MOORPARK SENIOR APTS MOORPARK, CA FIRST FLOOR J!Z Vw — vd M� USA PROPERTIES (� FUND, INC. f �1 C) 2 BR 2 BR I BR ICI F' I BR I BR 2 RR FRONT ELEVATION !�P ! lily 2 tip. SIDE ELEVATION (FOR IIlLk slug, sn Ni II ,, FOR SIHOAR 11 „V , BUILDING TYPE 4 MOORPARK SENIOR APTS MOORPARK, CA AT'y n: k'11.101W MATf'.R I A IS ''NJ('RI -1F TIN R(W)FIN6 I;ARIM, AN I) SIDING W.,8- 1'XP()SI IItI Itl'; AWN 2X WOOD VAS('IA PITS A WN 2X W(K)II HARGfi 11 NAWN2XW(N)I)(.0RNFR'I'RIM I +1!SA W N 2X4 1 N. H)R & W INI)()W TRIM I I 1l1'N W X)D STA11(S & RAILS V 111'('ASI f N('RF'I'i 1RI 1115 I I A 14'N 6 X 1001 TF11.H I/,IRS )I II: HOW RVSAW'N —XG V1-H' I'll �:',I n. 0,00NA1. I'RIMI• I(I-.SAWN 2X ,1:1,'ON'IA(. 1'RIMA IIARI4 /(IARI) -111., !' 1' X 14 ),lI IH I V; 1111..SPI 11 1.(), "; I; H SI f u I "I I.It VI.!NFIJ, , .b JL II USA PROPERTIES FUND, INC. ri PORCH DECK ii It WOMEN SkOWERS LU DIM It p II KITCHEN p - D( FO ER 7- - - -- STORAGE 101 MEN DE:l COMMUNITY ROOM 42".366 ---- I ---- - ---- OFFICE I LAUNDRY 120..4 OFFICE 2 PORCH HALL LOBBY COPY MAIL LIBRARY OFFICE 3 ENTRY PORCH RECREATION BUILDING MOORPARK SENIOR APTS MOORPARK, CA Iz 12 USA PROPERTIES FUND, INC. C) Z'% I REAR ELEVATION RIGHT ELEVATON RECREATION BUILDING MOORPARK SENIOR APTS - - MOORPARK, CA jbz ►' t T, T zr I L.T S -- r b� ►A '� ,1 16...a= a fti1 l: FXTI[RIOR MATFRIAI.S I. CONCRFTF TILF RIXIFING 2. HARDBOARD SIDING W/tl" EXPOSURE 1. RESAWN 2X WOOD FASCIA 4 RESAWN 2X WOOD BARGE 5 RESAWN 2X WOOD CORNER TRIM 6. RFSAWN 2X4 DOOR &WINDOW TRIM 7. RESAWN WOOD STAIRS & RAILS W/PRECART CONCRF.TF TREADS N RF.SAWN 6XIO OUTLOOKERS .1 GARLF. TRIM. RESAWN 2X6 VERTICAL- & DIAGONAL. TRIM, RFSAWN 2X8 o_ IIORI2:ONTA1. TRIM,& HARDBOARD SIDING W/4 "EXPOSURE 10. 2X10 TRIM RAND I1 2' WIDE SPLIT I:OUVFR SKITTER FRONT ELEVATION LEFT ELEVATION RECREATION BUILDING USA PROPERTIES MOO RPA RK SENIOR APTS -- -- FUND, INC. MOORPARK, CA f� I p_ I ',Pft © 9 2002 jL ® I, .r... .rte, RESOLUTION NO. 2002- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 2002 -01 TO CHANGE THE LAND USE DESIGNATION FROM C -2 (GENERAL COMMERCIAL) TO VH (VERY HIGH DENSITY) FOR A 9.48 ACRE SITE (ASSESSOR PARCEL NO. 512 -0- 050 -185 AND A PORTION OF 506 -0- 050 -475) LOCATED ON PARK CREST LANE AT PARK LANE, ON THE APPLICATION OF USA PROPERTIES FUND WHEREAS, at a duly noticed and advertised public hearing of the Planning Commission on June 24, 2002, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. PC- 2002 -426, recommending to the City Council approval of General Plan Amendment No. 2002 -01; and WHEREAS, at a duly noticed Public Hearing on July 10, 2002, the City Council considered General Plan Amendment No. 2002 -01, to change the land use designation from C -2 (General Commercial) to VH (Very High Density) for a 9.48 acre site located on Park Crest Lane at Park Lane (Assessor Parcel No. 506 -0 -5- 050 -185 and a portion of 506 -0- 050 -475) on the application of USA Properties Fund; and WHEREAS, at its meeting of July 10, 2002, the City Council conducted a public hearing and received public testimony, and after receiving public testimony closed the public hearing; and WHEREAS, the City Council, after review and consideration of the information contained in the City Council staff report, and testimony received, reached a decision on this matter on July 10, 2002. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. The City Council does hereby find that General Plan Amendment No. 2002 -01, is consistent with the goals and policies of the City of Moorpark General Plan, subject to amendment of the land use designation as proposed. SECTION 2. That the City Council adopts the following California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) findings: CC ATTACHMENT 4- Resolution No. CC -2002- GPA 2002 -01 Page 2 1. That the Mitigated Negative Declaration prepared for USA Properties Fund project serves as the environmental document for General Plan Amendment No. 2002 -01, 2. In order to reduce the potential adverse impacts of this project, mitigation measures discussed in the Mitigated Negative Declaration have been incorporated into the development project associated with General Plan Amendment No. 2002 -01 as conditions of approval and are consistent with the goals and policies of General Plan. 3. A Mitigation Reporting and Monitoring Program prepared in compliance with Assembly Bill 3180 and considered in the various decisions regarding these projects applies to General Plan Amendment No. 2002 -01. 4. The City Council finds that based upon the whole record before it, including the initial study and any comments received that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment and that the adoption of the Mitigated Negative Declaration represents the independent judgement and analysis of the City of Moorpark. SECTION 3. That the City Council hereby approves General Plan Amendment No. 2002 -01 for a change in Land Use Designation from C -2 (General Commercial) to VH (Very High Density) as further described in Exhibit A. SECTION 4. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this resolution and shall cause a certified resolution to be filed in the book of original resolutions. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 10th day of July 2002. Patrick Hunter, Mayor ATTEST: Deborah S. Traffenstedt, City Clerk EXHIBIT A: General Plan Exhibit Map GENERAL PLAN EXHIBIT N" ui A Locy POGEL .17 AVE L,0,5 SITE D > XO4,o Ct C-2 to vH APN 506-0-050-18 and Parcel B of Parcel Map 5316 EXHIBIT A "N A ORDINANCE NO. A ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING ZONE CHANGE NO. 2002 -01 TO CHANGE THE ZONING DESIGNATION FROM CPD (COMMERCIAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT) TO RPD -20 DU /AC (RESIDENTIAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT 20 dwelling units /acre) FOR A 9.48 ACRE (ASSESSOR PARCEL NO. 512 -0- 050 -185 AND A PORTION OF 506 -0- 050 -475) LOCATED ON PARK CREST LANE AT PARK LANE, ON THE APPLICATION OF USA PROPERTIES FUND WHEREAS, at a duly noticed public hearing of the Planning Commission on June 24, 2002, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. PC- 2002 -426, recommending to the City Council approval of Zone Change No. 2002 -01; and WHEREAS, at a duly noticed Public Hearing on July 10, the City Council considered Zone Change No. 2002 -01 for a change in the Zoning Designation from CPD (Commercial Planned Development) to RPD -20 du /ac (Residential Planned Development 20 dwelling units /acre) for a 9.48 acre site located on Park Crest Lane at Park Lane (Assessor Parcel No. 506 -0 -5- 050 -185 and a portion of 506 -0- 050 -475) on the application of USA Properties Fund; and WHEREAS, at its meeting of July 10, 2002, the City Council opened the public hearing and took public testimony, and after receiving public testimony closed the public hearing; and WHEREAS, at a duly noticed public hearing of the Planning Commission on June 24, 2002, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. PC- 2002 -426, recommending to the City Council approval of Zone Change No. 2002 -01; and WHEREAS, the City Council, after review and consideration of the information contained in the City Council staff reports and testimony, has made a decision on this matter. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK, DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: CC TTACHMEN T. Ordinance No. CC- ZC 2002 -01 Page 2 SECTION 1. Environmental Documentation A. The Mitigated Negative Declaration prepared for USA Properties Fund project serves as the environmental document for Zone Change 2002 -01. B. In order to reduce the potential adverse impacts of this project, mitigation measures discussed in the Mitigated Negative Declaration have been incorporated into the project and to the extent that they relate to the zoning for the site shall apply to Zone Change No. 2002 -01. C. A Mitigation Reporting and Monitoring Program prepared in compliance with Assembly Bill 3180 and considered in the various decisions regarding these projects applies to Zone Change No. 2002 -01. D. The City Council finds that based upon the whole record before it, including the initial study and any comments received that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment and that the adoption of the Mitigated Negative Declaration represents the independent judgement and analysis of the City of Moorpark. SECTION 2. The City Council hereby finds that the proposed Zone Change will be in conformance with the City's General Plan, subject to adoption of a Resolution approving General Plan Amendment 2002 -01, and is in conformance with the City Municipal Code, including Title 17, Zoning. SECTION 3. The City Council hereby finds that approval of this Zone Change request is in accord with public necessity, convenience, general welfare, and good zoning practice and that for those reasons it is appropriate to reclassify the property to RPD 20 dwelling units per acre, as the RPD designation would provide a suitable location for residential land uses that are compatible with property located in the vicinity of the property. SECTION 4. The City Council hereby approves Zone Change No. 2002 -01, subject to the approval of RPD 2002 -02, changing 'k. -1 v a ii Ordinance No. CC- ZC 2002 -01 Page 3 the zoning designation on the property from CPD (Commercial Planned Development) to RPD 20 du /ac (Residential Planned Development 20 units per acre maximum) , as further described in Exhibit A. SECTION 5. The City Council hereby directs staff to amend the City Zoning Map to reflect the approved zone change. SECTION 6. That if any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, part or portion of this Ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance. The City Council declares that it would have adopted this Ordinance and each section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, part or portion thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, sentences, clauses, phrases, parts or portions be declared invalid or unconstitutional. SECTION 7. This ordinance shall become effective thirty (30) days after its passage and adoption. SECTION 8. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Ordinance; shall enter the same in the book of original ordinances of said city; shall make a minute order of the passage and adoption thereof in the records of the proceedings of the City Council as which the same is passed and adopted; and shall, within fifteen (15) days after the passage and adoption thereof, cause the same to be published once in the Moorpark Star, a newspaper of general circulation, as defined in Section 6008 of the Government Code, for the City of Moorpark, and which is hereby designated for that purpose. Ordinance No. CC- ZC 2002 -01 Page 4 PASSED AND ADOPTED this day of 2002. Patrick Hunter, Mayor ATTEST: Deborah S. Traffenstedt, City Clerk EXHIBIT A: Zone Change Exhibit Map ZONING EXHIBIT MAP CPD TO RPD -20 DU /AC 4 E APN 506 -0- 050 -18 and Parcel B of Parcel Map 5316 EXHIBIT A RESOLUTION NO. 2002- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA APPROVING RESIDENTIAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 2002 -02 TO PERMIT THE CONSTRUCTION OF 190 - UNIT SENIOR CITIZEN APARTMENT UNITS ON A 9.48 ACRE SITE LOCATED ON PARK CREST LANE AT PARK LANE (ASSESSOR PARCEL NO. 512 -0- 050 -185 AND A PORTION OF 506 -0- 050 -475) ON THE APPLICATION OF USA PROPERTIES FUND WHEREAS, at a duly advertised public hearing of the Planning Commission on June 24, 2002, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. PC- 2002 -426, recommending to the City Council approval of Residential Planned Development No. 2002 -02; and WHEREAS, at a duly noticed Public Hearing on July 10, 2002, the City Council considered Residential Planned Development Permit No. 2002 -02 to permit the construction of 190 -unit senior citizen apartment units for a 9.48 acre site located on Park Crest Lane at Park Lane (Assessor Parcel No. 506 -0 -5- 050 -185 and a portion of 506 -0- 050 -475) on the application of USA Properties Fund; and WHEREAS, at its meeting of July 10, 2002, the City Council conducted a public hearing and received public testimony, and after receiving public testimony, the City Council closed the public hearing; and WHEREAS, the City Council, after review and consideration of the information contained in the City Council staff report, and testimony received, reached a decision on this matter on July 10, 2002. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. The City Council does hereby find that Residential Planned Development Permit No. 2002 -01 is consistent with the City's General Plan, subject to adoption of a Resolution approving General Plan Amendment 2002 -01. CC ArracHMeNa 6 Resolution No. 2002 - RPD No. 2002 -02 Page 2 SECTION 2. That the City Council adopts the following additional findings. California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Findings 1. The City Council further finds that Residential Planned Development Permit No. 2002 -02 is consistent with the Mitigated Negative Declaration prepared for the project. 2. The Mitigated Negative Declaration prepared for General Plan Amendment No. 2002 -01, Zone Change 2002 -01 and Residential Planned Development Permit No. 2002 -02 serves as the environmental document for the Residential Planned Development Permit. 3. In order to reduce the potential adverse impacts of this project, mitigation measures discussed in the Mitigated Negative Declaration have been incorporated as conditions of approval of Residential Planned Development Permit No. 2002 -02. 4. A Mitigation Reporting and Monitoring Program prepared in compliance with Assembly Bill 3180 and considered in the various decisions regarding these projects applies to Residential Planned Development Permit No. 2002 -02. 5. The City Council finds that based upon the whole record before it, including the initial study and any comments received that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment and that the adoption of the Mitigated Negative Declaration represents the independent judgement and analysis of the City of Moorpark. Residential Planned Development Permit Findings: 1. The proposed project is consistent with the intent and provisions of the City's General Plan and Zoning Ordinance. 2. The proposed project is compatible with the character of surrounding development. Resolution No. 2002 - RPD No. 2002 -02 Page 3 3. The proposed project would not be obnoxious or harmful, or impair the utility of neighboring property or uses. 4. The proposed project would not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience, or welfare. 5. The proposed project is compatible with existing and planned land uses in the general area where the development is to be located. 6. The proposed project is compatible with the scale, visual character and design of the surrounding properties, designed so as to enhance the physical and visual quality of the community, and the structure (s) have design features which provide visual relief and separation between land uses of conflicting character. SECTION 3. The City Council approves Residential Planned Development Permit No. 2002 -02 subject to the Conditions of Approval (Exhibit A). SECTION 4. The approval of Residential Planned Development No. 2002 -02 is contingent upon final approval by the City Council of General Plan Amendment No. 2002 -01 and Zone Change No. 2002 -01 and shall not become effective until the effective date of the zone change ordinance. SECTION 5. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this resolution and shall cause a certified resolution to be filed in the book of original resolutions. Resolution No. 2002 - RPD No. 2002 -02 Page 4 PASSED AND ADOPTED this 10th day of July, 2002. Patrick Hunter, Mayor ATTEST: Deborah S. Traffenstedt, City Clerk EXHIBIT A: Conditions of Approval for Residential Planned Development Permit No. 2002 -02. Resolution No. -L:�LG'-2002- GPA 2002 0 `'G 200 2 91,—RPD No. 2001 -A9-102 Page 5 EXHIBIT EA CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR RESIDENTIAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 2002 -02 A. DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CONDITIONS: 1. The Residential Planned Development permit is granted for the land and project as identified on the entitlement application form and as shown on the plot plans and elevations incorporated herein by reference as Exhibit "A" on file in the Community Development Department Office. The location and design of all site improvements shall be as shown on the approved plot plans and elevations except or unless indicated otherwise herein in the following conditions. 2. The approval of Residential Planned Development. No. 2002 -02 is contingent upon final approval by the City Council of General Plan Amendment No. 2002 -01 and Zone Change No. 2002 -01 and _ - s .all no'.- vecome e-1 ectlrae unt i the effective date of the zone change o.r..d..i.na.nce. In the event that the Zone Change is not approved by the City Council this RPD permit shall become null and void. 7,L-.3. Use Inauguration: Unless the Residential Development Permit is inaugurated (building foundation slab in place and substantial work in progress) not later than two (2) years after this permit is granted, this permit shall automatically expire on that date. Upon application for an extension of time filed with the Community Development Director at least 30 -days prior to the expiration date, the Director may, at his /her discretion, grant up to one (1) one (1) year extension for project inauguration if there have been no changes in the adjacent areas and if Applicant can document that he /she has diligently worked towards inauguration of the project during the initial three -year period. -1--.4. Other Regulations: The design, maintenance, and operation of the permit area and facilities thereon shall comply with all applicable regulations of the applicable zone and all ves \r.... zni.ty I.)eve .o�ment',F, '' D`., ?CO2- ;.;1., \F.esoiut. ans C..... .ons .,..:.:... rwd r..ondit .ons tzr ^.:a. doc: ;t;lrr r ilt7 t k)rz +c .ti r2Pi3 h k> �,_ , F.� r ris E:>n .t.:.arrs ^,xeso- z�-d orto't ")rne " r �itFz iris\ rsso �aF >itd # z ­aris t1a_a tr> E exr�can' 7 i�r °rt�1R- .�...... .. -- ik':t> =t� frm Cc>x�z l art4txt' rr t� ;ci >rrc r{ uit s .. �= _ ............ — — - - -- - -.... . Modified: Resolution No. -PG -2002- PA 2002 91,9G 2992 G1, RPD No. 2001 -�02 Page 6 requirements and enactment's of Federal, State, County, and City authorities, and all such requirements and enactment's shall, by reference, become conditions of this permit. -1-.5. Duplication of Conditions: All mitigation measures contained within the approved Mitigation Monitoring Report and Program (MMRP) are hereby adopted as requirements of the Residential Planned Development Permit, as applicable. Where conflict or duplication between the MMRP and the conditions of approval occur and applicability for compliance is questioned by the Developer, the Community Development Director will determine the applicable condition compliance requirements for each phase of development. -1-.6. Image Conversion of Plans: Prior to issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy, the builder shall pay to the City a fee for the image conversion of building permit plans as determined by the Community Development Director into an electronic imaging format acceptable to.the City Clerk. - 1- -.7. Public Nuisance: The Community Development Director may declare a development project that is not in compliance with the Conditions of Approval or for some other just cause, a "public nuisance." The Applicant shall be liable to the City for any and all costs and expenses to the City involved in thereafter abating the nuisance and in obtaining compliance with the conditions of approval or applicable codes. If the Applicant fails to pay all City costs related to this action, the City may enact special assessment proceedings against the parcel of land upon which the nuisance existed (Municipal Code Section 1.12.080. -1-.8. Approval of the Residential Planned Development Permit is conditioned upon execution of an Affordable Housing Agreement, or other mutually acceptable agreement between the City of Moorpark and the applicant or developer to insure the affordability of the project. Compliance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement shall address affordable housing provision and the term of the - .....:... .t Cona.t_....o..........s.......'........e.....s.....o .... ......c.....c ..........a cona..t.o. .s usaorarmn.t,' `eve'.00ment'.F P •1;;;;- ,L'.F_ — .. .n ..........................0 ....... ............................... ................:......................................................................._................................................. ....................... n ^l i i. e c . roc, S :t , >r imu n:3: #-:.•:......F)r $2- r'i ert- tr$- strA.S..._-#. -s c7i•tci_:.._r... .._{ .i . _'.x-;ie3--- e'C- rf3i3:: - :3:irf3_S: ---- - - - - -- ': ":_ ----------_------ t3.`3i2 ,F.n. _,: ti..._ .rj�. >.c.E:- 1- pae'f3�R-- �i£+1�,t 1',' s� — *y� .. _ .. ... _._... _..... _. ... ... .. t2:i3 .fic) {..,: j(;CH3tIftt3f3 �-i. ,+ f)c`Vc..JUi£tci3 -E. tit v v -, Ott Modified: 07: f0 Resolution No. � -2002- 99P 01,9G- nnnn 94 Page 7 affordability. The Agreement is subject to the approval of the City Council. By mutual agreement, these provisions will be incorporated into a regulatory agreement if bonds are issued to finance the project. -1—.9. Affordable Housing Agreement (Development Agreement) Preparation Fee: Developer shall pay to City the amount of Seven Thousand Five Hundred Dollars ($7,500.00) for the City's cost to prepare the required affordable housing plan and agreement. -1—.10. Outstanding Case Processing Costs: The Applicant shall pay all outstanding case processing (Planning and Engineering), and all applicable City legal service fees within sixty (60) days of approval of this RPD Permit. The applicant, permittee, or successors in interest shall also submit to the Department of Community Development, prior to or concurrently with the building permit application, a fee to cover costs incurred by the City for Condition Compliance review of the RPD Permit. 11. Design/ Development Standards: Prior to issuance of a Zoning Clearance, the building elevations shall be revised to be consistent with the conditions of approval for this Residential Planned Development Permit, subject to Community Development Director approval. 12. Landscape Plans: Within thirty (30) days of issuance of a Zoning Clearance for a Grading Permit, the Applicant shall submit a complete Landscape Plan shown on the approved e >e .oarient \,,F• D,I :;:J1- 02.`•,F.esn -ut .ons Cond=.t.ons`•,reso cc rad conditions usa r. . rloc E, r retr y:#: ; 3ez :2 -_.r green t- k- _ } }a;z -i r:r - -b_ ,ktrS >iH�... f...... ... .trAf3.isf -:} 33:...... ..r2.... . .r E'.-_ -? x�.._..e' rr,n -_ <,irS faelt -1 ` :�z_ ut-i l i3c v� Ua_i °: dt- &e iae, Vf'4-a0fille+i : it—t-'-- (3 .f2 -�;'Ei+ -H- Est }r} 3 % { }ftt4= _wt, 0.115 F -e�:i t} C "tXi- E:`i}ii C.�i �-1.. tt:i cl Modified: 07 ,,n g' V! � "I � . 3 G, J , -i 1 j. idniess in any abiatting street i_ , ti having ' t . l er / _ 12. Landscape Plans: Within thirty (30) days of issuance of a Zoning Clearance for a Grading Permit, the Applicant shall submit a complete Landscape Plan shown on the approved e >e .oarient \,,F• D,I :;:J1- 02.`•,F.esn -ut .ons Cond=.t.ons`•,reso cc rad conditions usa r. . rloc E, r retr y:#: ; 3ez :2 -_.r green t- k- _ } }a;z -i r:r - -b_ ,ktrS >iH�... f...... ... .trAf3.isf -:} 33:...... ..r2.... . .r E'.-_ -? x�.._..e' rr,n -_ <,irS faelt -1 ` :�z_ ut-i l i3c v� Ua_i °: dt- &e iae, Vf'4-a0fille+i : it—t-'-- (3 .f2 -�;'Ei+ -H- Est }r} 3 % { }ftt4= _wt, 0.115 F -e�:i t} C "tXi- E:`i}ii C.�i �-1.. tt:i cl Modified: 07 ,,n g' V! � "I � . 3 Resolution No. - E-G-2002- , 2 RPD No. - Page 8 grading plan, together with specifications and a separate Maintenance Plan. The Landscape Plan shall encompass all areas required to be planted consistent with these conditions of approval. The Landscape Plan shall be reviewed by the City's Landscape Architect Consultant and approved by the Community Development Director prior to Zoning Clearance for building permits for the first apartment building. The Landscape Plan and inspection requirements shall comply with the following: a. Prior to initial review of the landscape plans, the Applicant shall deposit funds for plan review in an amount specified by the Community Development Director. The Applicant shall deposit additional funds upon request as needed to cover all landscape plan check and inspection fees and City administrative costs. Any deposit balance remaining following final approval of the installation shall be refunded to the Applicant. b. All plant material shall conform to the current issue of the American Standard for Nursery Stock published by the American Association of Nurserymen. C. Prior to final inspection by the City of Moorpark, the Applicant's landscape architect shall provide written certification to the City, stating that the installation is in substantial conformance with the approved landscape plans. d. Prior to final inspection by the City of Moorpark, the Applicant shall provide a written certification for the operation of the backflow device. e. All backflow preventers, transformers, and other above -grade utilities shall be appropriately screened with walls and /or plantings. f. The planting and irrigation design shall comply with the State of California Model Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance. S: \Comuamn=.ty Deve.opment \Ri P D \2Gn2 -C2`P eso'.utions Cond=.ti.ons'.,_eso cc od condit4ons us ........................................ ...................................... _...._....._.._...._......._.........._......----- ................. ..._...._..............................__._.........................._........_.................................................................... ...... _..._._....._._...__................_._.......................................... Modified: 07 j03 ^ ?'^'' :7Inv2 ' Resolution No. P-GI-2002- GPA 2GG2 —� , 20G2 R P D No. 2001-A9-1-0_ Page 9 g. Prior to occupancy, the landscape installation shall be approved by the Community Development Director. This approval shall be based upon written certification of the landscape installation by the City Landscape Consultant. h. The Tree Valuation Report completed for this project indicates that the site contains one (1) California Pepper tree located in the center of the property. The total valuation of the tree is $10,133. The landscape plans shall provide enhanced landscaping that totals the amount of the estimated tree impact pursuant to Section 12.12.070 of the Moorpark Municipal Code. i. Final landscape plans shall not proposeany invasive exotic plats as determined by the City's landscape consultant and approved by the Community Development Director X5-13. Fence /Wall Plan: A fencing, perimeter, gate, and privacy barrier wall plan, including a six (6) foot high -----.- ......................................................................_.... ............................... - - -- ---.._._._. .............................._ wrought ron. fence with decorative block ,Di.l.asters a r.'oU.:d the sw!mmina pool, and complete with related landscaping details, identifying the materials to be used and proposed wall heights and locations shall be submitted to the Community Development Director within thirty (30) days of issuance of Zoning Clearance for a Grading Permit. The fence /wall plan shall be depicted on the approved grading plan and shall require approval by the Community Development Director prior to issuance of Zoning Clearance for building permits for the first apartment building. All fences /walls along lot boundaries shall be in place prior to occupancy of first building, unless timing for installation is otherwise stated in these conditions. Where applicable prior to approval of the final fence /wall plan, the Community Development Director shall approve the connection of property line wall with existing fences and or walls on adjacent residential properties. The Developer is required at his /her sole expense to connect or reconstruct adjacent residential walls and or fences to the e: °...Qpni...r7t ,F. :: I, ,1..:,; ;1 ?. ,F......J tat.. nn - ad S ,..,.. °�:� _, � _.nna- .-cuL :o Ana;. n. ur:r� i-_' -- -,-'- Ffc`ac'z H# .3E3.g..._E 7t3E - is'f.- : X7[3 5 -'e8 st3..._Pti......,, =. >}i ...._t .&YtJ a.:i: , : =_'Dn s ..._..... ......_ -- --_ -- ........ 2 ......... . ____ ____ _ _ ........ -- tSSz2.ii!3f� -P\2 u" *2 t\ Fes el A- *T3 - C-af14 ilDftS 1,Qa !�M i3d i #: i!311 3 ..:...... }�— �, -cc-- i3=t z=ii ii- c- rcr- -crr�° tat }:i..._ Eif)i.3t .: +..t- >i }s.:r�:t�.:ta -z t rrrrr�......U5_1 - _._....._ ..............._................................._............_........ 1' T......................... ..........�.._........._..___.— _... ...................- _._-- ..: —._ _.....__....._.._....._.._._...._...._...._........................ .._............................ _...___....._.................................. ............................... Modified: 07;0;/0 G7 Resolution No. - Pa--2002- nn 2Gn7_r� ZG G2 Ol 2 G�: -�... _. .. , �- �,�. —U-T.. j RPD No . 2 0 O 1 -�0 �. Page 10 project perimeter wall utilizing the same type of material, or better, that comprises existing walls and or fences that are to be connected to the project perimeter wall. All wrought iron fencing shall include decorative xlock pilasters, subject- to the approval of the Co au. nunity Development Di_.r..ecto..C. 14. Sight Distance on Fence /Wall and Landscaping Plans: The Developer shall submit fence /wall and landscaping plans showing that provisions have been taken to provide for and maintain proper sight distances. All fences, walls and other structures shall be submitted to and approved by the Community Development Director. 15. The main entry drive shall incorporate stamped concrete or other decorative paving as approved by the Community Development Director. 16. Signage: Prior to the placement of any permanent signage on the site, a Master Sign Program consistent with the Zoning Ordinance riteria must be approved by the Coranuni.ty Develo -ment Director. A signage program that exceeris Zoning ........_.. — ...__ ........................................... ......................._..__... -- ------ ..._...._.._.. -- ... - - -- - . ._......._..._...._......_..... - -... Ordinance cri.te.ria may only be approved by the C:.ty C0. unc.i. ].. through the approval of a Minor Modification. Entrance and project identification signs shall be of a monument design ................................_.................__..........._.._....__.._.__..._.......................................... .._........._......._..._...... .......... _ ... _ ......... _.. . ... _ ..................... .................. -- _......_........... incorporating the a.r..chi..tectura . l features, ma.te.r.ia_ls and coloration approved for the protect. 4-6.17. Lighting Plan: An exterior lighting plan designed in accordance with Section 17.30 (Lighting Regulations) of the Moorpark Municipal Code shall be submitted to the Community Development Director within thirty (30) days of issuance of Zoning Clearance for a Grading Permit. The lighting plan shall be depicted on the approved grading plan and shall be approved by the Community Development Director prior to issuance of Zoning Clearance for building permits for the first apartment building. Prior to initial review of the lighting plans, the Applicant shall deposit funds for plan review in an amount specified by the Community Development Director. The Applicant shall deposit additional funds upon request as needed to cover all S: 1Cor nurn ty IJeve'.wr:.ient \'R. P',.L; :;v1 -U1 ,•P eso uY. ons Conc.,r.T..ons ., so pr.', cored .t .on :> usa. : ......................................... µ..............:.........:............-......................................::......................... ...... _...__............................................................................._.._..._.._.......... ............................... _°...................:_:.:...........-................................................... ............................... r:.�...d cS—! '.t.'l'Sr�'rn�ri'xi k �'xr' �3t'iTflS i3':3'rRr`�It '�' -'µ i'� 1. CY -i t3$-?'tTrtS .................--- ________ ' d......... ................_......_a._.... ___.. ..._...._ .. _............ - - -___ _.__ ........................_..... ._..........._........__...._._ .. __ ....�. t :tattrr .1..._ <_* e� <_ Re airs- r...3rtti_.f .3r;s : ��. 4Ej..._ F�.. F� ,.......od.....F. >E.,r. ;d..t.. E.,i.3 s ................. .............__._.............. --._....... .... :.................._..._..— ------ .............._.... = - - = ... _ _ __..... .._................._.... :....- :.....:...... a :i2t.t1ee . iCcHiRi %3rl f3.v�cuvt =.errt ,h �3iv� _ eft : :"> rrx :r Cc3sic_t urt:'r , 2ee> rJv �<rrr<i•.. #._ort :, r;. - Modified: 07 j0 %0., Resolution No. -T-c,-,-2002- GPA 2902 Gl`�C 299 G7-, RPD No. 2001 --6402 Page 11 X18 lighting plan check and inspection fees and City administrative costs. Any deposit balance remaining following final approval of the installation shall be refunded to the Applicant. Ultra -low water consumption plumbing fixtures installed consistent with City Ordinance No. project shall also include a requirement for the energy saving devices or construction features: shall be 132. The following a. Ultra low flush toilets (to not exceed 1.6 gallons); b. Low water use shower controllers as required by Title 24 of the Uniform Building Code shall be placed on all shower facilities; C. Stoves, ovens, and ranges, when gas fueled shall not have continuous burning pilot lights. d. All thermostats connected to the main space- heating source shall have night set back features; e. Kitchen ventilation system shall have automatic dampers to ensure closure when not in use. x:19. olar anels: : S P The location of solar panes for heaeting any sw._mrr.i_ng >ool, or for hot water heating for the units, shall be subject to the approval of the C_ommu.n.i.t.�T___. Development Director _....pr.ior.__...._t.o issuance of Zoning .. ._..._..... _. _ C.t.ea..rance for b .....d_ng permit. A1...1. solar panels s' :a. -.. be designed so as to be part of the overall design of the structure(s). 20. Asbestos: No asbestos pipe or construction material shall 't'1P 1'iCP!"i 4€ -21._ Within thirty (30) days of issuance of Zoning Clearance for a Grading Permit, the applicant shall submit a detail of the pool and spa area for review by the Community Development Director. The pool and spa plan shall be approved by the Community Development Director prior to issuance of Zoning Clearance for building permits for the first apartment building. The pool and spa plan may be submitted as part of the Landscape Plan. 9, Cortrnzni.ty Deve:.opment`IR D`.,1:::L- U1`.,F.esniut.on, Conditionfa`,,- so cc rod conditions usa .............:..................................................................._._......._...................................._`................................................................................................_................................................................_..............'.:..°...................................._................................................... ............................... Ui i. 3 e •cceifffttttk:i- t_ I apf(te ft t# .fi ._i'......f}" 4-4 G2�Reselat Modified: 0 %/v3 2o- 7-%P.' ` G 2 G:' ` "2 ` Resolution No. - PG -2002- GPi� 2ut_n1 , 7,r 2GG2 nI j RPD No. 2001 -4-1-02 Page 12 4--22. Within thirty (30) days of issuance of Zoning Clearance for a Grading Permit, the applicant shall submit a pedestrian walking /seating plan for the project for review by the Community Development Director. The pedestrian walking /seating plan shall be approved by the Community Development Director prior to issuance of Zoning Clearance for building permits for the fist apartment building. The pedestrian walking /seating plan may be submitted as part of the Landscape Plan. 244—.23. Within 30 days of issuance of a Grading Permit a lot line adjustment or lot merger as determined by the City Engineer or Land Surveyor and in accordance with the Subdivision Map Act shall be submitted to make the two existing lots into one lot. The lot line adjustment /lot merger shall be approved by the City Engineer prior to the issuance of a Zoning Clearance for a building permit. 2-1--.24. Modifications to Permit: All facilities and uses other than those specifically requested in the application are prohibited unless an application for a modification is submitted to the Department of Community Development consistent with the requirements of the Zoning Code. -.-25. Rain gutters and downspout shall be provided on all sides of the structure for all structures where there is a directional roof flow. Water shall be conveyed to the street or drives in non - corrosive devices as determined by the City Engineer. 2­3—.2 6 Maintenance of Permit Area: The continued maintenance of the permit area and facilities shall be subject to periodic inspection by the City. The permittee or owner shall be required to remedy any defects in ground maintenance, as indicated by the Code Enforcement Officer within five (5) days after notification. I;`�27. Citywide Traffic Mitigation Fee: As a condition of the issuance of a building permit for each residential unit within the boundaries of the Tr— ae:L� -'. Residential Planned Deve opment, Developer shall pay City at the time of issuance of a Zoning Clearance for construction, a L ( r to ro : r�. o - v c. r? - r f` r .. r c� r r . n i t ..x azn r- - L.. :..�tiri..n _`�F. I_�.L:;i;l-i;l .I-...._,.r_.ut.:..�i1e ..,.xilai.T.__�ns , ,_� ..c, rnt c...n >ns t y eq. r...... k..... z..... #3.... �:, -. fEr str tai# t:trrt } (. trFkcY s ..... ..Frg..,,?..�Sv--c.c......r... yep......... Y: #- ttriiS T — vr. -�—ry� j3�3i}�- �:�iiS._ .:f•. .�5.3..... .z .x......£:� �..... .... i2E:t��.:�� -:� � i�2� �tv:s- :cc>c�.: -: •,Curia =.czttt�i. =,: �3�v�icrvzitett #,tk r f3 �u�r —,_ , k� .iu_tr���rrS— Gc�zz<r���- ert� -e- :ter -z�_ �vci i:rrnes�i_uti.s �i:s_ ?,�,3; Modified: ,, Resolution No. - E-a--2002- 2002 29G2 .. , RP D No. 2 0 01 -4-1-G 2 Page 13 traffic mitigation fee as described herein ( "Citywide Traffic Fee ") . The Citywide Traffic Fee may be expended by City in its sole and unfettered discretion. The amount of the Citywide Traffic Fee shall be $4,240 per residential unit. Commencing January 1, 2003, and annually thereafter, the Citywide Traffic Fee shall be increased to reflect the change in the State Highway Bid Price Index for the twelve (12) month period that is reported in the latest issue of the Engineering News Record that is available on December 31 of the preceding year ( "annual indexing "). In the event there is a decrease in the referenced Index for any annual indexing, the Citywide Traffic Fee shall remain at its then current amount until such time as the next subsequent annual indexing which results in an increase. %x-28. Fish and Game Fee Requirement: Within two (2) 2 —2 9 days after the City Council adoption of a resolution approving this project, the Applicant shall submit to the City of Moorpark a check for a single fee of $1,250.00 plus a $25.00 filing fee payable to the County of Ventura, to comply with Assembly Bill 3158, for the management and protection of Statewide Fish and Wildlife Trust Resources. Pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21089; and Fish and Game Code Section 711.4; the project is not operative, vested or final until the filing fees are paid. Pa._r..'k Fee: Prior to issuance of Zoning Clearance for building permits, the developer shall pay a fee in accordance with the Ordinance 52 and the City's Parks and Recreation Facilities requirements, the amount of which will be determined as part of the Development Agreement. . �0. Miscellaneous Fees: Applicant shall pay to the City capital improvement, development, and processing fees at the rate and amount in effect at the time the fee is required to be paid. Said fees shall include but not be limited to Library Facilities Fees, Police Facilities Fees, Fire Facilities Fees, entitlement processing fees, and plan check and permit fees for buildings and public improvements. Further, unless specifically exempted by City Council, the Applicant is subject to all fees imposed by c. \r rrxri't ).v r.nt ,F .. L,._,1 - _1 ,Fe ut.o cc :ad cond.t_ons uoa ..I ,•, . -- `n- . . eiX Cvi_: f.ciiiiFRtYf?:. '+` �)Fi +e :l3J:TRc'A :. 1ff i �) - 111— o Rea, -. t3$-��7ti4- -t,��T3�i "- t73"t:i '. Y:2:i0 t.t. 'ii: is i�l"ii.: ::Of15 .... ..__ '� ___ c. ..... \ — _. ........ ........ ... t.('. F: 3f?tf: it3i. T.. t....... :,�� >.��,.!:3i?Ei��'i3 #�. \,.I?- ."— ft- C.L�tJtT'LL�iJ'Ll'_C> 3' is T. C-=_ F. l' I' T' J'.....F`.4ii'T.:�.:i_4ji'T'c3" t_ F. 4>. 5. 4�'__ FaF�a ......f:i'.a(— f�~iTE:t._.'. f�li3.q. ....._._ .................------....._.......__......_........_....... ..................................... _........_.._..__........------......._.. ._..__..._.___._.__._..__..____ `...::.........._.......__...._.._...'-___'....._..__........._............:........=..........._:....__.----..___._ _......_....................... ................................___—. \_.. ±?fCtk:{ = LLe3.� �i1 _._._H_........... .. ......... n ___............... ............ ._.k_.i._s..i.....ti - Modified: 07 r0 }%r 2 17' G 73 G 2 ^7;^' ^7;^' _. Resolution No. -g4_2-2002- G o 2092 01 ZG 2GG2 nl 2 �z� —��7 �� -�--� , RP D N o . 2 0 01 -£�-G �� Page 14 City as of the issuance of the first permit for construction and such future fees imposed as determined by City in its sole discretion so long as said fee is imposed on similarly situated properties. 231. Traffic System Management Plan: Prior to the issuance of a Zoning Clearance for construction for each residential unit, the permittee shall make a contribution to the Moorpark Traffic Systems Management (TSM) Fund for each residential unit, the amount of which will be ....._. ...._._._ .............._....... _ _......._........................................ ............._._............... determined as part of the Developments Agreement, b ;t in no event less than five hundred dollars ($500) per un-it e r to fund TSM programs or clean -fuel vehicles programs as determined by the City. 2--9-32. Los Angeles Avenue Area of Contribution (AOC) Fee: The applicant shall contribute to the Los Angeles Avenue Area of Contribution (AOC) Fee Program. The Los Angeles Avenue AOC Fee shall be paid in accordance with City Council adopted AOC fee requirements in effect at the time of building permit application. The AOC Fee shall be paid prior to the issuance of Zoning Clearance for each building permit. Cable Television: During construction, Developer shall allow all persons holding a valid cable television franchise issued by the City of Moorpark ( "Cable Franchisees ") to install any equipment or infrastructure (including conduit, power supplies, and switching equipment) necessary to provide Franchisee's services to all parcels and lots in the Project. Developer shall provide notice of its construction schedule to all Cable Franchisees sufficiently in advance of construction to allow the Cable Franchisees to coordinate installation of their equipment and infrastructure with that schedule. City shall provide Developer a list of Cable Franchisees upon Developer's request. 3� --:34. In the event the cable television services or their equivalent are provided to the Project or individual lots 5 • \ r, Ut..e \..:r:.mun .t.a D_ Dent \E. : L: \LC;:;� -; ?`,,F.esa.ut .ores Conti .t.ons \ esn c rnci cored t .ores usa ................................................................................... ............................... _ .._.............. __ ...... ......_ _ .... ....... ........-.... ............................... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . y„ .:.`._`': `... Q t <:.`...._... ...t� erF?kF{tLI Fr?: t:.x:._...k3rizc- < :>FC4c`.Ci #:..,.. ..._. }_.__�)'; _:_e _._ _.�1._.._. >.FEC`.' 4e7:i -k3 ::?: FrEi'.} - -C� 7Af7:t- :- 1:crT�S- ,..r_�.q - w,?(1.__ .' i7Ft(33:.3:c'�i3 5 . ..................................................................._....... 2...._.."""""'.._......................_.._.._.........._.._.........._..____.........._...._.._........__.._.......__...._....___......"""""'---""""""". .__.._......_......._.......... ........ ... ........................... .............._................ xsti. de...iS: i..... txt3 v ;�.; � ..,c}t.tf *ttt..;i? D,\ 2 . 2—L* .� � �4. j air t ct-.t • . � a _ ..i... tz =: <z }.,, • �C\x.[.ttftsl_ Eke, } xec..2k ,h _ f3 ur— �Fe33tri o.i. Cr }fiQ�l }i't.'ii e::ii} c rr}u c: (} x: -l. <r.s: 5__ Modified: 0 7; /A2? ) Resolution No. 7P-c--'-2002- R � —. 02 2GG2 G1 , R P D No. 2001-4-.-02 :.. Page 15 under collective arrangement or any collective means other than a Cable Franchisee (including, but not limited to, programming provided over a wireless or satellite system contained within the Project), the apartment management entity shall pay monthly to City an access fee of five percent (50) of gross revenue generated by the provision of those services, or the highest franchise fee required from any City Cable Franchisee, whichever is greater. "Gross revenue" is as defined in Chapter 5.06 of the Moorpark Municipal Code and any successor amendment or supplementary provision thereto. 35. Graffiti Removal The a :cant or his /her successor and .................................._.............................................._..__.._......._._.._._.__._._...._...._......_......._....._...... ........_..............._._.. -- -._..._... ..........__....._....__...._.. --._._..._.....__._.._..__........................................._............ ._...._._. ... _ ................ . assigns, or 'the property management ent -ity shall remove any graffiti wi.t hi. ri f...ve (5) .ays from written not.i..f.ication from the Citv of Moorparc. All graffiti removal shall be accom -olished to the sat.isfact- on of t'he Communit -y DeveloDment Director. 36. Roof Mounted Equipment: No roof- mounted ecsuipment (,other than r..equi..r..ed. vents) shall be per.•rli..tted. 7xcept -ions to this limitation requires approval by the Comm �_it.- Je_�_elop meat Director. 37. .Tents and Metal Flashing: All roof vents and metal flashing shall be pa i_rted to match the roof color. All deck drains shall drain to the side and riot to a sidewalk or driveway. 38. Archaeological or Hi-sto.r_ical F-irds: If any a.rchaeol.og.i.ca.l or istorical finds are uncovered during excavation operations, alp grading or excavation s all cease i the i..mmed..i-ate area, and the find left- untouched.. The � e.r..m.a.ttee shall assure the preservatio_- of the site; shall notifiy the Community Development Director in writing of the find; shall obtai_i tY.e se.r vi. ces of a qua.l....f.l_ed pal..eontol_ogist or.., archaeologist, whichever is appropriate to recommend di s�osition of the site; and sriall obtain the ':ommuni t a - - ...__-._ ......................................... ...._......._.................. - -- - -..........._......................... ._....................._..__... -- - -...........................................................................--_............................. ..............................- 1 Deye_loom.ent Director's wr.i.tten concur.r..•ence o.f.. the recommended dW d s p:_, �tio n -cfore resuming development. The developer shall be liable for any .costs associated with the nr_ofessiona.1 investigation arid. di.i. st ",osi..ti_on. S: `r eve .oament`.R P D\20;02—.;2'I .,:,F.eso .uti.ons Condi t .ons \_ e so cry rpd cond .t -icons us ... 'Commun , D.. ......................... .................... ................................................_...... ...... .....................__._.................._............................................................................. .............................................. _.............. .....................__ ....... _ .._e TT . avc .9—i -) F�6Ai. �!}I }3. 1. }i•rt r. �o i F!$ -� --- ! -- i)'; - eri;. {tr".'�SFr•. } }#-- irF- '3..._l tirflc l #=- !-e7E }S';- r�Si7: t. <. .:'�"X3 :,;..._L�- *�_l�lptt<_*trt _ �_ t._;�.2....fze�F>��rt�_�_ �_ i3 ���= �- �- �_ �- �e._.�•.�,�;}.....e�jit� -�.�,� ur:....•......F ) ev2 I at n h- �3,_� >_ ,, ht:u # ,trfi «s-t. �,- r.:- �e�re ..: -- .�......_..... }+ r °Ttts._t Modified: 07 :0 V `, Resolution No. -� -2002- GPA 2992 2902 91, _RPD No. 2001-4-.-02_ Page 16 39. Dis-oosal Areas on S4: te E" 1 a - A -,---ash disposal and recycling areas shall be provided in a location, which will 4 rcil. _ , I at.-'; i parking o.r access to the not interfere with J. 'A ; ii - 4-or , building. The final design and location of the trash enclosures shall be sublect to review of the Community Development D.i..-rect.or pri-or to the issuance of a Zoning Clearance for -building permit. Trash areas and recycling bins shall be de-oicted on the final construction p_IanS, the ............................... . ..... . ... . . ................................... s.d. z e of w hi c h s a J. 1, be app.r.•oved y Community ....... . ...... Development Director and the City's solid waste management staff. All trash disposal an :recycling areas shall rue cdesi.cfned in accordance with the followina reauirements: a. Rubl_./ish disposal areas shall include adeauatle, accessible an'. convenient areas for collecting aria .loading recyclable materials. The dimensions of the recycling area shall accommodate containers consistent - with cur-rent methods of collection in the area. in which the project is located. -s shall be Meauate number of bins or container. provided to allow for the collection and loadinq of recyclable materials generated by the development. For ................. commercial (general-, off -ice, or retail) , developments, space allotment for two 12" three cubic yard bins I ) ...... ................ . ................... . ............... . .......... . . . . . . . . ... .... ............................................. (107" x 84 or 168" x 53.5") , or a space allotment- for one (1) 40 cubic yard lb-in (288" x 1.20"7 and one (1) 3 b c W� ic yard bin (84" x 53.5). The intended use for this space is to hold two side -by -side 3 cubic yard containers (one for, refuse, one for recyclaID-1. es), or one (1) 40 cubic Yard bin for refuse and one (1) 3 cubic yard bin for recyclables. The dimensions r o vi G,. e a.. apply to the space ava.ilal le when the gate is fully open. C. The design of the Lisposal area enclosures shall be ............... ....... architecturally___��_gi-isistent with the development and d .... ... . ..... compatible with the surrounding area as approved, by the Community Develo,,Dment Director. 9 ; \Communi'tv Deve I opment\P, T? D\12-.,r�2--,2,,Pe�--,o--iit�-ons Con d, tions\,resc) cc -fpd cc) nd-it-i on s, us;a ............ ................................... . .................... . ....... ... . . ....... ............................................................................ . ............. . . ... ............. 42­�il _­f .......... . ................................... . ..... . ... . . . ... . .. . ....................... ... . . .......... . i.....e.....f...i..s . ±._*.�­e- li ... . ....... . Modified: . 0 7 / 0 3 / 0 2 ' Resolution No. -PLG-2002- GPA 2992 20022 Gr. ,-RPD No. 2001-6402 Page 17 Each disposal -osal area enclosure shall be screened with a six foot (6') high solid masonry wall enclosure and six foot (6) high gates and shall. be designed with cane bolts to secure the gates when in the open :position. e. Disposal area enclosures shall have a roof so as to be .. . ........................... . .................. protected from weather conditions, which might render collected recyclable materials Unmarketable. f. Driveways or travel aisles shall. -orovide unolostri-icte access for collection vehicles and personnel, and provide the minimum vertical clearance of 30 feet, or .............. ...................................... ­ r othe soecified clearance required. by the collection methods and vehicles utilized by the hauler. g. A sign, a--)oroved by the Community Development Director, clearly identifying all recycling anIJ solid waste collection and loading areas, and the materials acce-111te I therein shall be -t)osted. adjacent to all points of access to the recvclinu areas. h. Refuse disiDosal areas shall. not be located in anv area required by the Municipal Code to be constructed or ................... ............ maintained- as unencumbered, according to fire and other applicabble building and/or- pu1blic safety laws. .................. .................. 1. Recycling area.(s) shall be located so they are .................. convenient and adjacent to regular refuse collection areas. ..... . . ..... . ....... . j. Space allocation for rubbish and recycling enclosures shall be designed in a manner that complies with the equal access reQui.reirients of Title 24 an-. the Amer-ican Disabilities Act. K. The enclosure shall have a secarate indirect peAestrian access way, which does not require doors or .......... . . . .. gates. 1. Prior to Zoning Clearance for Building Permit, the ....... . ..... . . ............... . ........ . .. . ...... . .. I Ci..ty Engineer will. review the design plan for S: "'Commun It v De-velopment\1P, tat ons, Cored ti -eso cc -i�)d cored it- .ores us a ................................................ . .................. .................. . ........... . .................................................... .. ............. ....... eq. do...c.....S ........ ...... ty G R eeeltlt� e—t�an�d t ',�,n �-&90e . .. - e 2 002-t42 CCfld —r-E, - -&Tftr?tu-n± t y Eke"?�e 1 alar"te R-e-:s- &. 114t. -- ................. ........ . _. ___ _ i i:t4--R- -il 4� �� - — 11 F1 Modified: 117/03 Resolution No. &G-2002- GM 2002 01,ZG 2002-91,-RPD No. 2001-4102 Page 18 compliance with National Pollution Discharge Elimination Svstem (NPDES) reauirements. .T. All litter /waste .......... material shall be kept in leak proof ...... ..... . .. ... . - ... ...... . ... . . .. ............................ . ........................................ ....... containers. The area shall be paved with impermeable material. No other area shall drain onto these areas including rainwater. There shall be no drain connected from the trash enclosure area to the storm drain system. However, the drain from the trash enclosure shall be connected to the sanitary sewer and have an .......................................................................................................... automatic seal that shall preclude any escape of gases or liauids from the sewer connection. 40. Refuse Collection: The franchised refuse hauler designated to service this location will be determined Prior to construction. 41. Parking Lot Surface: Al ! parking areas shall be surfaced with asphalt or concrete and shall include adequate Provisions for drainage, striping and appropriate wheell blocks, curbs or posts in parking areas adjacent to landscaped areas... ....................... All ........... E�L., .......... ��d loading areas shall be ...... .... .... ... . . . .. . .................................. maintained. -, a t a.11 time to insure safe access and us by residents, Public agencies, and service vehicles. 42. Swimming Pools: 7, sit: foot high wrought iron fence with decorative platers shall bepp:noviced around the swjE4rj: ..g. Pools. The design and location of the fencing -shall -be to the satisfaction of the Communitv Development Director. 4?. Enforcement of Vehicle Codes: Prior to issuance of a Zoning Clearance for the first residential building permit, the a p, City enforce .plicant shall request, in writing, that the ........ .......... . ....................... . ................. . ........ . ..... . ...... ....... . . . . . .. . .......... appropriate vehicle codes on the subject property as Permitted by Vehicle Code Section N21107.7. 44. Verification of Dedication of Property to Ventura County Flood Control District (VCFCD): Prior to issuance of -a Zoning Clearance for the first residential building permit, the applicant shall submit written verification from VCFCD that the area required by the VDFCD for the Arroyo Simi Faood Control Channel has been dedicated to the VCFCD. . . . . . . . . . . . . any ... ... ... ... . - . .. . ... ... ....... . ................................................. - . ..... . ... . . ....................... ........... ......... ..................................................... ............................................. Modified: 01/03/0 C 1; 1; :,:: 9 Resolution No. - � -2002- -0T� --�R P D No. 1- :. :.. Page 19 C. CITY ENGINEER CONDITIONS: General Conditions: =�-. 4 5. The Developer shall post sufficient surety guaranteeing completion of all site improvements within the development and offsite improvements required by the conditions as described herein (i.e., grading, street improvements, storm drain improvements, landscaping, fencing, bridges, etc.) or which require removal (i.e., access ways, temporary debris basins, etc.) in a form acceptable to the City. —.46. The Developer shall indicate in writing to the City the disposition of any wells that may exist within the project. If any wells are proposed to be abandoned, or if they are abandoned and have not been properly sealed, they must be destroyed or abandoned per Ventura County Ordinance No. 2372 or Ordinance No. 3991 and per Division of Oil and Gas requirements. Permits for any well reuse (if applicable) shall conform to Reuse Permit procedures administered by the County Water Resources Development Department. . ................... ....... If hazardous materials are found on the site, the Developer shall stop all work and notify the City immediately. The Developer shall develop a plan that meets City, State and Federal requirements for its disposal. X48. The applicant shall comply with all pertinent County of Ventura Public Works Department water and sewer connection regulations implemented by the County of Ventura Public Works Department Waterworks District No. 1. x-49. All existing and proposed utilities shall be under grounded as approved by the City Engineer. X50. Prior to improvement plan approval, the applicant shall submit plans to the Ventura County Fire Prevention Division and obtain the approval of the location of fire hydrants. ,, S:',Corm:nin..ty Leve..oartent ...F, U``.,...... - ;2 ...,F.....,...' ut .onr> Con .ti on:: so cr., rid cond .t .on :> us a. _r i� C O - " <C t3TRIRt3 A y f)ri+TP. !- e31JiflPA I*i'-- i3 .rte. v 1 ftP. 5i3i k3 f tOfi Ei (:liT3t' #- trl't.4" t 1`c`.`,4 "ti i 7E: i:0i?i :. -I3 9- §3Sr3.fFjE'. � %F?4,�cE3- i3- *3,•,• r°,•••,:: n Ica F red... an rr� —^-n dr t �fl5 r'�a .;c'. r d...- e.m -lEti. �: i. jf3f,= ........_._ ............................_._ .._..__ __.._.................._........._..._..._..__..._..._...—_................ .._...._....._._............._. __ — ___. _.. ' __..._.......... ........... >...... .. .. ., , cH(tS(tTiE bcVi:- :.c }f'>fr}F..i .......1c:(t.....- .... rim— cis -t�iEf=3T}rti :.i- -Fc...... _ +.: {..... ..- {- , {i<`)-- c "c'.._....... i- -c ?c }f§fi_ :..::_c }HS --..Sa _— _ .................._._._ ____.................._.._.....__................................._.—.__._...._______............................._._....._............._._............._.__.....__....._...._.._.........................____.................._ ......_.._..___.____....._..__. Modified: 0 7; 0, 3 ; 0. ^.=o-+ Resolution No. - � -2002- GPA 200 �ZC, _2902 91 j RPD NO. 2001 --6402 Page 20 x-51. This project shall lots in violation of the Map Developer shall provide all granted to the City free encumbrances. not create any non - conforming Act or local ordinances. The easements and rights -of -way and clear of all liens and - 5 . 2........_ ....... ........................._..... ......................._..Prior to any work being conducted within any State, County, or City right of way, the Developer shall obtain all necessary encroachment permits from the appropriate Agencies. Copies of these approved permits shall be provided to the City Engineer. Grading Conditions: 453. All development areas and lots shall be designed and graded so that surface drainage is directed to acceptable locations or natural or improved drainage courses as approved by the City Engineer. Altered drainage methods and patterns onto adjacent properties shall not be allowed without mitigation. 54._ ........................... _ .... ROC, NOx and dust during construction grading will be suppressed by the following activities: a. The fuel injection of all diesel engines used in construction equipment should be retarded two degrees from the manufacturer's recommendation. b. All diesel engines used in construction equipment should use high - pressure injectors. C. All diesel engines used in construction equipment should use reformulated diesel fuel. d. Construction grading shall be discontinued on days forecasted for first stage ozone alerts (concentration of 0.20 ppm) as indicated at the Ventura County Air Pollution Control District air quality monitoring station closest to the City of Moorpark. Grading and excavation operations shall not resume until the first stage smog alert expires. , •n` L , - iltn l ; ;`�. 'e;o cc `.JI C.O.......t...d .... .'.. .t 7.OT`3 li 8C. '\•(omr.111T1_ ty CU velo-me ntF L\2•- J Cd't' ............................................ ......................:.............._.............................................................. .............................................._..... ..._.........__..._............ . ............................... ........_.... ............. .............. .!.�i7. i- rtiF3S.__E �Ii?# tbi52513]O' fE3 t: -,p ; ._ci i_ 3 _L; �_ i, _....' \..24't,2 t� r ---s� � {'. U .r:t CtOi:.: ". tC; i }TtTTRt1f3 #. L}l: "'d F}\_ 1�-iii #". i } }1341{. -�}fi ;__..tt:i _t _____ 2 ...__...... _ ...... .- _ _ ..... ........................... - .... ..... .. Modified: 0"7 0 3 /0 d' Resolution No. -,�G-2002- GPA 2GGP 2992- —, RPD No. 2001 -4�0 Page 21 e. All clearing and grading activities shall cease during periods of high winds (i.e., greater than 15 miles per hour averaged over one hour) to prevent excessive amounts of fugitive dust. f. All material transported off -site shall be either sufficiently watered or securely covered to prevent excessive amounts of dust. g. All active portions of the site shall be either periodically watered or treated with environmentally safe dust suppressants to prevent excessive amounts of dust. h. Facilities shall be constructed and operated in accordance with the Rules and Regulations of the Ventura County Air Pollution Control District. i. Large -scale construction vehicles and trucks exiting the project site during the mass grading period shall be required to have tire wash -downs to minimize the dispersion of dust onto local streets. 42--. 55....._._._. ..........Prior to issuance of the initial grading permit, the developer shall prepare an Erosion and Sediment Control Plan to address construction impacts and long -term operational effects on downstream environments and watersheds. Certified Erosion and Sediment Control Professional or a qualified Civil Engineer shall prepare this plan. The use of jute or other artificial cover approved by the City Engineer will be required for all graded slopes during the period of October 1 through and inclusive of April 15. Proposed management efforts shall include (but not limited to) provisions for the use of vegetative filtering enhanced by creek bed reconstruction, preparation of detailed erosion control plans, appropriate use of temporary debris basins, silt fences, sediment traps and other erosion control practices. The proposed plan shall also address all relevant NPDES requirements and recommendations for the use of best available technology. The erosion control plan shall be reviewed and approved by the Community Development Director and City Engineer prior S .. "nmrntr.... . L:.- ....oar:.tent...F, P L,,L ....;;1_ -"2 .F.:...:._.ut. one nd.t...ns ..., ._.,. ,. _�d .nnciit.i ns ... usa tF; ru {� }� • t V 9,ev 7JIRFf i ;iE - ---e_ ii= iE?'s >it }$- }CAS E: Cri?c - # - .erTtS ', c 50 t t Al : tr }tc s:# i ` ......_.`.._tx.-- ----...._..... _ ......................... z........._ .... ..............................- - • n it r, -- :n_ .. . t{ ix'rtt#a!ev e : >s tt j, ._..._....__....................... ............ ..... .... ......... ._- ..... £ _..v_...t...r..e .. ... e..L...e.....l....- . ..........f &15.. _U El ..... .................................. . Modified: 0'7%0/0 Resolution No. - P-G-2002- G 2002 _97 9,G, r,2_n� 1 SPA --,�� U ..� RPD No. 2001 -£0 Page 22 to issuance of grading permits for mass grading. Sediment yields in the watersheds within the project boundary shall be computed for pre- development and post- development conditions in accord with methods outlined in Erosion and Sediment Yields in the Transverse Ranges, Southern California (United States Geological Survey, 1978). These estimates of sediment yield shall be completed prior to initiating final design of the debris /detention basin facilities situated in the downstream portion of the project. 4-56. Temporary erosion control measures shall be used during the construction process to minimize water quality effects. Specific measures to be applied shall be identified in the project Erosion and Sediment Control Plan. The following water quality assurance techniques shall be included, but not limited to the following, as deemed necessary: a. Minimize removal of existing vegetation. b. Provide temporary soil cover, such as hydroseeding, jute blankets, mulch /binder and erosion control blankets, to protect exposed soil from wind and rain. C. Incorporate silt fencing, berms, and dikes to protect storm drain inlets and drainage courses. d. Rough grade contours to reduce flow concentrations and velocities. e. Divert runoff from graded areas, using straw bale, earth, and sandbag dikes. f. Phase the grading to minimize soil exposure during the October through April rainy season. g. Install sediment traps or basins. h. Maintain and monitor erosion /sediment controls. 4 -4-57. To minimize the water quality effects of permanent erosion sources, the following design features shall be incorporated into the project - grading plan to the c • `.•Corimun=.tV Development \,,R P I" .2'- '-- 2- ,.2`,,Reso.- ...uti.ons C _..>na-.tions ,•reso r..c end c<u3dit.i.ons usa . _002-0- -, _.... ............. x...._.........._...._.._.._.._......._..................... ...........- _____....___....___ __- - - -� 'Re s c,:_ tr_,- _�ari_s t3{c3.fi!�f; : \ != i`3fittYft _..��..�i3f'.tE' {3 :\i? �iv *rz'--•y i_f�S!�a.. E rpd _.J {3Ek #...:9{ic .. _ t -r: t' &es x 1Ccx nt{3 {i x flc veit>t>r e,nt, tR i` Re -e-lu Modified: 07/011/0 Resolution No. -PG-2002- G � 2002_ F G2 G 2 �-,-m �:� �— .��� �:: - -�-., � RP D N o . 2 0 O 1 -£�-0 �. Page 23 4--S-5 8 satisfaction of the City Engineer. The City Engineer shall review and approve the grading plan to verify compliance with Best Management Practices features including, but not limited to the following: a. Drainage swales, subsurface drains, slope drains, storm drain inlet /outlet protection, and sediment traps. b. Check dams to reduce flow velocities. C. Permanent desilting basins. d. Permanent vegetation, including grass -lined swales. e. Design of drainage courses and storm drain outlets to reduce scour. The following mitigation measures shall be implemented during all construction activities throughout build out of the project to minimize the impacts of project- related noise in the vicinity of the proposed project site: a. Construction activities shall be limited to between the following hours: a) 7:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. Monday through Friday, and b) 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 P.M. Saturday. Construction work on Saturdays will require payment of a premium for City inspection services and may be further restricted or prohibited should be City receive complaints from adjacent property owners. No construction work is to be done on Sundays and City observed holidays. b. Truck noise from hauling operations shall be minimized through establishing hauling routes that avoid residential areas and requiring that "Jake Brakes" not be used along the haul route within the City. The hauling plan (including a map of the haul route) must be identified as part of the grading plan and shall be approved by the City Engineer. C. The Developer shall ensure that construction equipment is fitted with modern sound - reduction equipment. 9 ; \Comrnzn.t.v Deve.oartent_ \,R f; \20iL- ,;: ?_ \F:e::o_.uticuis Conditions \reso rpd cond.t.orl: usa ._. .2 C OC_: : � tiiiRIRII Et t.2.. .1 }eVe l3JnIeflt \Rl -- - o il- c� I*2 S�7ilit t c3i3C :. #�:.tirilS li':230 • c:- -c3Ei c vF3t -_'.:# vF3.`r. LL. �;.< ;;3 -_ ter-:; !. ...{ c -vc ��,� -�,� -fir-= b._�n- ,=- �,- _�,-ht..�tr�r� #= errs — fat} e- �t- st> tis. 1'= r•; c>._ z_ �_... r. �--=. �t�rkt 'i-:- {!i>fi. =;.._.. {.t.c;._,. Modified: 0-, ;j Resolution No. - Fa_-2002- GPi2 n01,Z. 2002 01 , RPD NO. 2001 -4-. 02 Page 24 d. Stationary noise sources that exceed 70 dBA of continuous noise generation (at 50 feet) shall be shielded with temporary barriers if existing residences are within 350 feet of the noise source. e. Designated parking areas for construction worker vehicles and for materials storage and assembly shall be provided. These areas shall be set back as far as possible from or otherwise shielded from existing surrounding rural residential neighborhoods. f. Property owners and residents located within 600 feet of the project site, shall be notified in writing on a monthly basis of construction schedules involving major grading, including when clearing and grading is to begin. The project developer shall notify adjacent residents and property owners by Certified Mail - Return Receipt Requested of the starting date for removal of vegetation and commencement of site grading. The content of this required communication shall be approved by the City Engineer in advance of its mailing and the return receipts, evidencing United States mail delivery, shall be provided to the Engineering Department. g. A construction effects mitigation program shall be prepared and submitted to the City after completion and occupancy of the first phase of project build out. This program shall protect, to the degree feasible, new residents from the impacts of sustained construction. 4 -6-59. Grading and improvements shall be designed, bonded and constructed as a single project. 4--/--.60. The Developer shall submit to the City of Moorpark for review and approval, a rough grading plan, consistent with the approved Preliminary Grading /Drainage Plan, prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer. The Developer shall enter into an agreement with the City of Moorpark to complete public improvements and shall post S:`,Cor:munit�> Deese.- lopment \P, 1 D`.2;;; ^L.- C1`,F.esn'.ut. ons Conditions \reso cc mod cond'.tions usa ............. .................. .................. ..... ...................................... _ ..... _...................................................................................................._............. ................................................................... ........ ..... .............. _......... ............................ .._................................... ..... ................ ........................ .. a „„ ,_„ uo...:. ^,s..... ri :t k3 �fec 7 r nt :fi :? F) _ Re :tt r# :trris (; ,rr t 7rs ;x2sa � r, z.....:.. . ................. ----- }3'�r2. .� �..•.'".;'3 %liii2ft�= t.';.` £ %......c jC.f.t _i3'�: R � : D 2.4vt -:� ,�?��t�£._,.. � }3 �F�}�.� =row pct YFa�td t: � f }3.. u:ia . f3t3 C'.:; •. iC iYlftE±tl}i�i�-> ;.__�)i:..Vi:' �siY'3rfti f} {- � ft �' ..{i�'� v v � —cr-`. ic2- scr� -ai: i-i)i} 3 ii>i3L� -�--%. -iYF3 3 � i 3�d� i i ; •Ufi ti L3 `.s _t Modified: 017 1%024' v 4' Resolution No. - �-G-2002- GPA 2G02 � ��2GG2 G ., RPD No. 2001 -4-02 Page 25 sufficient surety guaranteeing the construction of all improvements. 2 ................................................. _. The final grading plan shall meet all UBC and City of Moorpark standards including slope setback requirements at lot lines, streets and adjacent to offsite lots. X62. Concurrent with submittal of the rough grading plan a sediment and erosion control plan shall be submitted to the City for review and approval by the City Engineer. The design shall include measures for irrigation and hydroseeding on all graded areas within 30 days of completion of grading unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer. Reclaimed water shall be used for dust control during grading, if available from Ventura County Waterworks District No. 1. } 63. This project is projected to import soils onsite. Import /export operations requiring an excess of 100 total truckloads or 1,000 cubic yards of material shall require City Council approval prior to the commencement of hauling or staged grading operations. A haul route is to be submitted for review and approval by the City Engineer and Community Development Director. Additional surety for the cleaning and /or repair of the streets shall be required as directed by the City Engineer. Approval of the Haul Route Permit shall require the following: a. The haul route permit application shall be completed in its entirety including information indicating maximum quantity of dirt to be hauled. The haul shall be conducted only as permitted and no soil shall be transported to or from any site, via any route, during any time, or by any means except as specified in the permit. b. If import is coming from the east, the haul trucks shall enter the City from the Freeway 23 and Los Angeles Avenue interchange and proceed westerly to Park Lane thence southerly along Park Lane to the site. Empty haul trucks shall retrace the haul route. s:'.C, >P:.tP:A1IL t +I DeJ °'<?;?I[18 at ",T-: c' D.,I..•.••,•L- %L. \,R °: >C)i l,it'. :)rl;i r; pIlCSi t10IL`>`,i °Sp cc fpCY !: QIlditi QIl:; 1]Sd i.eQ.COi:-.`.._.._•�(LciiRftiti Ft-::.# x�`.....f?c".`Vc' -::ti >f'.iE`f3.#... fF:__�......f3.•�-= ii' { }' —o =-�'Hf.` Seri -t3' - �Y3i3.S..._('c3i3f'.'s- - ::�7i3 S- "i'St7.._� ._.."q'7E3___c'i3Afi -:: -::ins - _..__.. � ...................._......_________...._....................... 1....._...._........__........._._._._._........................._......__.._.._.._..__....._..........._..____________________._...__........._`...._.....___.._._._._._.................._...... ..........................____. __...._.........._.. ...._____..........._........._ .F'i3ft_.t.._. ...F �.....E.nc t... ...x•.£3f�.._f.�F_a33E3_..}:..y f}�. V is �. �J3Iitx. iii. t k {3 , _ ii ii _ ir-- �c- .ro--- cr��- i3f }:i C: C>Hii! t-' ! i)f} }i 1 �c` :'i {3 :Jf� 3ii{..��1. ± iYI'} :s -ti�:r :i Modified: 07%0;10 Resolution No. - '�LG-2002- �. 2GG2 01.,ZG 2GG2 � 91,-RPD D No. 1- 640,... Page 26 If the haul is from the West, the haul trucks shall enter the City from Los Angeles Avenue and proceed easterly to Park Lane, thence southerly along Park Lane to the site. Empty haul trucks shall retrace the haul route. If import is coming from the adjacent Arroyo Simi, then provide written approval from the Ventura County Flood Control District. C. The haul route permit application shall indicate the name of the dirt hauling company; the contractor's state license number; the contractor's City license number; proof of insurance per the City's requirements; the supervisor in charge, including work address, daytime work telephone numbers, a 24 -hour availability number and the number of days to complete the haul. d. The haul route permit application shall specify the starting and completion dates. No changes to the approved haul route, times and dates of operation, dust control, signage or traffic control shall be made without approval of the City Engineer and Community Development Director. e. The Developer shall procure a City Encroachment permit and post a cash bond in the amount of $500 per day for each day of operations approved by the City Engineer. The deposit shall be for payment of any costs incurred by the City related to the haul including but not necessarily limited to damage remediation, street cleaning, administration, inspection and monitoring of the permit. Upon certification by the City Engineer that the haul operation is completed and that, all damages to the City facilities and all costs to the City and its agents and contractors have been paid; the unused portion of the deposit shall be refunded. Should the costs to the City exceed the deposit amount, the Developer hauling the soil shall cease all work operations and deposit additional funds with the City, in an amount determined by the City Engineer, within 10 days of written demand by the City. S. \•Communito De =.%e opment "IR ' D`1,2."!,;2-::1`,,F.ef- olut.ons Condi.t_ons \resm cc- rad condition, usa. ............................._.._......_.....__....__.....................__......_...._......................_..........._..................................._.. ._......_..__..:............... ......................................._...:............................................................ ..............._..;..................................:............ ....._ ............. ...._....... :.ea.doc kk NIr{t{rr :t L— veICr`JiheR ;k. I3 } fies3stiti -&F {s Gen -0 i ins A- x2 so �x� ri<Y- ct - - -rrs z_ ... _.......__.._........_- ...... _ . Dexj:e+ I F?iament�, i f3f3{.,'-- - e.,ndit- 'afIs ttT:t # *r f3eve <>vfttt tr... -- z' f3 —, 'k. s > tr# s 3it5 Fe>tt� t rt f . cr vc: z.�{ti� ...ic> :5 t{:r.t Modified: 07i ;j ^v ^�'^ Resolution No. - Pte: -2002- Rs2902 o�.n 2nrz —RPD No. 2001- 44-02 Page 27 f. The haul permit shall be subject to revocation or revisions by the City Council or the City Engineer. A copy of the permit shall be available for review on the site at all times. The truck trip counts and yardage hauled shall be tallied as the trucks enter the import site. A true copy of the tally sheets shall be delivered to the City Engineer, or his /her designee, at the end of each working day that the hauling occurs. g. The haul operation shall provide traffic control to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. h. Hauling operations shall be conducted only on weekdays (Monday through Friday) and during daylight hours and only between the hours of 9:00 AM and 4:00 PM. Hauling shall be done on consecutive days, not including weekends and a lapse between hauling days shall invalidate the permit. i. Appropriate traffic warning signs and devices and a flagger shall be provided at the entrances to the public way. The flagging operation shall be directed to controlling the entrance of the trucks used to haul the soil on and off the public street. Disruption of traffic on public streets due to the haul operation shall be reduced to the maximum extent practical. j. All portions of the haul route and intersecting streets within 500 feet of the haul route shall be swept continuously during haul operations. No less than two street sweepers shall be in operation over the portions of the haul route within City jurisdiction during haul operations and for 30 minutes after the haul operation hours. k. Haul operations shall be suspended on rain days. The suspension shall continue until soils on the import site have dried sufficiently that the haul truck tires do not pick up the soils. c. \Comrnznity I` "' - es •` -eso rnd cond .bons; usa ,e<<e.'.opr.ent ,F. ' L` ,2.;,11 -,.?2 .,I._,.,..:.utions Conar.t�.ons ..•.. .. e«.ao.:,: E xnr rri.:.t kk��r ox r}t:R :2 14- ' 3v' = -, ;N.rstirsk3# Fis Cen._t_or}s:xes �F: :# F, _. -- _ s i3: iR;:, z�..: c± i`—** t� ?f: >SF� } }:i� *f3`3- F'�fYc2-i�}tS YF -E'Sj L{3i} ii�:iz}- :- EZt)� -., . �iC t3i?Hft2#ft �- t:�'a- 13c- vt:-��cit)r +h. i3- 4:....:{.f.....• -. f3�t -_ rtr_ — ci_�.. � he .s.ti {...sc)f }4�- ftH -rEi� �Erf }.;;.. �.__ x.. c- sc}..... c,. c,.......;::. &f...... i.' 13xi3 _.t ..i.c)s3�:i......tl�:i� =i Modified: 0' 7I0-3, i'0. Resolution No. -Pc -2002- GPA 2992 91,Z,-z:; 299 Tx r RPD NO. 2001 -49-4-02 Page 28 1. The soil shall be wetted to optimum moisture (ASTM D- 1557) before loading. Each haul truck shall have all soil cleared from surfaces outside the bed before traveling on a public street. The tires of the haul trucks shall be cleaned of adhering soil before traveling on any public street. The soil may be covered by tarps during the haul as an alternative to wetting the soil to optimum moisture. M. Onsite haul routes and soil moisture conditioning measures shall be such to eliminate tracking or blowing soil onto City streets or adjoining property from the loading, hauling, dumping or distributing portions of the operation. Onsite operations shall be coordinated to avoid passage of haul trucks over wet soils that might adhere to the tires of the haul units. n. The haul permit shall be signed by both the hauling company and the Developer and shall bind both to the conditions of the permit. X64. Temporary irrigation, hydroseeding and erosion control measures shall be implemented on all temporary grading. Temporary grading is defined to be any grading partially completed and any disturbance of existing natural conditions due to construction activity. These measures will apply to a temporary or permanent grading activity that remains or is anticipated to remain unfinished or undisturbed in its altered condition for a period of time greater than thirty (30) days except that during the rainy season these measures will be implemented immediately. X2-65. The maximum gradient for any slope shall not exceed a 2:1 slope inclination except where special circumstances exist. In the case of special circumstances where steeper slopes are warranted a certified soil engineer will review plans and their recommendations will be subject to the review and approval of the City Engineer and the Community Development Director. S: \Connnuu.ty Deve?.opnIent \1Fi D`,.2;:.;.2- ;;2`�,Feso`- cations Co na.t.ons ...,reso cc rLd conditions ...fsra. .. . y .. .:.e .dq "_.i( 3rRSRk} f3_ j-{-.:;_...}} r'.•iTr`.. ?- -... -} = oj_. �ir.:-._ �kc... 5i7:«. } }{':- ?:�rA.......1�7Fi(- i:t -i. 7i3.g..,, ?"25 r....i::c..._.r ;...3.....c'.vFiL {":- �:i73 "iS- \F usa -dee ..;.._; 'arrif'�t43i. ;._. {:y...... ;o.c.oi-F?Uf`d?ii ': {?- _.i.._La \- +;.•rt- c;.i._ti?c�u�> t3{'� �3Ii9.....i�E > %2Ei {' jitS.. -- .... 1Cc>r =,ttrtttft j }h aeit>rlxtetti h f3 u �Ft. #. carts- F,uf�c E >ftrro � esntr i uf3s -Ut5a Modified: n �7 / 0 >; J% Resolution No. -E- -2002 - G;PA 2()G2 -G1, ZG 2992 G ., RPD No. 2001 -4-1-0 Page 29 X66. All graded slopes shall be planted in a timely manner with groundcover, trees and shrubs that will stabilize slopes and minimize erosion. The planting will be to the satisfaction of the Community Development Director and the City Engineer. 6' _ -.--.-So as to reduce debris from entering sidewalk and streets, the approved grading plan shall show a slough wall, approximately 18 inches high, with curb outlet drainage to be constructed behind the back of the sidewalk where slopes exceeding 4 feet in height are adjacent to sidewalk. The Developer shall use the City's standard slough wall detail during the design and construction. The City Engineer and Community Development Director shall approve all material for the construction of the wall. 68 Grading may occur during the rainy season from October lst to April 15th subject to approval by the City Engineer and timely installation of erosion control facilities. Erosion control measures shall be in place and functional between October lst and April 15th. In order to comply with the October 1st date, revised erosion control plans shall be submitted to the City Engineer no later than September lst of each year from the start of grading or clearing operations to the time of grading bond release. x-69. Prior to any work being conducted within any State, County, or City right of way, the Developer shall obtain all necessary encroachment permits from the appropriate Agencies. Copies of these approved permits will be provided to the City Engineer. -?0. During site preparation and construction, the contractor shall minimize disturbance of natural groundcover on the project site until such activity is required for grading and construction purposes. &8 -?1.. During clearing, grading, earth moving or excavation operations regular watering shall control dust. In addition the following measures shall apply: \,,, e e " -'2 Condit_on.,\ so r :ad r.-ondit ons usa. S .. "ormnui.t.v U..,....;.opraent.,P, D ...,G... -vL _L \Eieco.;.ut..io... e cc :ec(.doc , E r r c�F3 t Deve.1 pf!l, -n ',F. r D ov_ Reee it2,xl -s E.,BQit -an r47 « i'OAC2# :.-7'ne .- ..- -..-- t ..._:.. - .. . .... .zf.....De.e < rr \F .....:... ...t...{ titrxt..z. F: l.:.. {.x..... , „ F. . t ��; F: \1= F,s.a, .......... >_t ........ t............. —..._.._......_......_............................ - e—t.� - .... un., r.r } kra ' t: : >.. n Modified: Resolution No. - PG-2002- rrn 2GG2 0 �r Pnn-__ n- RPD No. 2001 --f-02 _.o --r—, rr�, _. , Page 30 a. Water all site access roads and material excavated or graded on or off -site to prevent excessive amounts of dust. Watering shall occur a minimum of at least two times daily, preferably in the late morning and after the completion of work for the day. Additional watering for dust control shall occur as directed by the City. The grading plan shall indicate the number of water trucks that will be available for dust control at each phase of grading. b. Cease all clearing, grading, earth moving, or excavation operations during periods of high winds (greater than 15 mph averaged over one hour). The contractor shall maintain contact with the Air Pollution Control District (APCD) meteorologist for current information about average wind speeds. C. Water or securely cover all material transported off - site and on -site to prevent excessive amounts of dust. d. Keep all grading and construction equipment on or near the site, until these activities are completed. e. The area disturbed by clearing, grading, earth moving, or excavation operations shall be minimized to prevent excessive dust generation. f. Wash off heavy -duty construction vehicles before they leave the site. —7 2 . After clearing, grading, earth moving, or excavation operations, and during construction activities, fugitive dust emissions should be controlled using the following procedures: a. Apply non - hazardous chemical stabilizers to all inactive portions of the construction site. When appropriate, seed exposed surfaces with a fast growing, soil binding plant to reduce wind erosion and its contribution to local particulate levels. b. Periodically, or as directed by the City Engineer, sweep public streets in the vicinity of the site to .! C Oi'. ".._'.. ,E _C3IRI�ii3 Fi:2-#..�'.. §3E`i +e i�7 fRC'f3 : � i'...f31..aGlu= r. Re SeA_u4A :-&n ti E.i'�Tif: 2. S-' u:i.;r. .. :...�{.cH!H(41iF3.t. {is •......}3i' V c3 z c }UF.t�. ii #"_ 1.k_..._ �r� �_ ii Fi -_ —ii i-- ;- xrc —.ic7s - 1_ —rc}E3 £i..._FFc3 %3 { }. ..._...zcd7i £i..1..0 -c3 £i c }..._�� � ....._x:. .._. c "cJP3f3.: +.. #i.: +_c3FtFi - -2tsi -i .........................._...____.—_— ......... _ 1......._....._..........................._......._._._...._..__.__.. _.....__...................._ -- __._..____....._............... _............ ........._............. Modified: 07/0;%0^ Resolution No. -Pc -2002- RPA 2GG2 2GG2 GI..; RPD No. 2001 -£-1-02 Page 31 remove silt (i.e., fine earth material transported from the site by wind, vehicular activities, water runoff, etc.), which may have accumulated from construction activities. During smog season (May - October) the City shall order that construction cease during Stage III alerts to minimize the number of vehicles and equipment operating, lower ozone levels and protect equipment operators from excessive smog levels. The City, at its discretion, may also limit construction during Stage II alerts. 74. ............................ _._ ___ ______ If any hazardous waste is encountered during the construction of this project, all work shall be immediately stopped and the Ventura County Environmental Health Department, the Fire Department, the Sheriff's Department, and the City Engineer shall be notified immediately. Work shall not proceed until clearance has been issued by all of these agencies. --G�. 75. The Developer shall utilize all prudent and reasonable measures (including installation of a 6 -foot high chain link fence around the construction sites or provision of a full time licensed security guard) to prevent unauthorized persons from entering the work site at any time and to protect the public from accidents and injury. x-76. Backfill of any pipe or conduit shall be in fl- inch fully compacted layers unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer. _ Soil testing for trench compaction shall be performed on all trenching and shall be done not less than once every 2 feet of lift and 100 lineal feet of trench excavated. Test locations shall be noted using street stationing with offsets from street centerlines. "' Observe a 15 -mile per hour speed limit for the construction area. c`',r p ..,. ,•.,.rtmuzr_t.. De =. /e'.cr_rtent',F: D',,1..•.•.L- Ul. ...,..... t_on: rona_t.ions.,reso cc nr., concx..t_ons usa i.elX. cll l�' i` i_:._ i( l:- t"'r�r�'��'�Y'�:'::.xy...... 3F "Zfi C' lIx'�r C'fY' #. .1: ..... ]..._. i,.._: S%" LJ.-.._. til":''' Re" rJi''' T:::" ��. �.. �. tt�Y. �3__. E. tY�3Ci' �:' �": ::'C3�Y.ry..�.r..�.a3.�)..._1�1 ......_r...i)ll___l.'.'V3'Y'f'� �' :C�'rY "5_ ................_.....`........_....---- .`..:......_................. .... i.............._...._......__......__........_.._......_...._...._.._.. .........\................._... _ ........ - .... _.................__._...._............._._....._....__..__.._.... _......._.._..........._.._.... �f F"�T fi�F:''.'{*...:... �':' 1.._.'' Ji,>; i. f->._! j{. 1 < >{'�''�'�:'�`...-- 1_"�•.t�'L�t it *LG— t}"Lt24ac`.fijy } }..y qi. ;.4.... ;�. Fad.; Fy jj. Yc... TpcFa..._ F_ ?f�......!_{)i-- �Fj�'if:�' -'L�- jf. ;G. ty � . t r n. " -� ,'- - r this >» t # a t s ... � ..c 'i'.._'�'t> . ......................._.......-----._.........._................ ..............._..__._.._.__... Modified: 07/0,/020 Resolution No. -P�_'-2002- GPA 2002 0-�T 2902 GI ,—RPD No. 2001 -4-1-0 Page 32 - 6-.79. During site preparation and construction, construct temporary storm water diversion structures per City of Moorpark standards. Geotechnical /Geological Conditions: — 0. Prior to submittal of grading plans the shall have satisfaction geotechnical a geotechnical report prepared Developer to the of the City Engineer and at the minimum the report shall address the following: a. The applicant or subsequent developers shall contract with an engineering geologist and geotechnical engineer to quantify the engineering properties of the on -site soil materials, to assess the potential for weak soils or bedding layers which may affect cut and /or natural slopes, and to verify that grading planned within the site is consistent with factors of safety approved by the City's consulting Geotechnical Engineers. This geotechnical study shall, as deemed necessary by the City Engineer and consulting City Geologist and Geotechnical Engineer, further assess slopes within or adjacent to proposed residential development areas. The findings and recommendations of the geotechnical assessment shall be incorporated into the final design for the project. b. The applicant will determine with subsequent geotechnical studies, the location of any landslide or unstable area, if existing or immediately adjacent to the site. Landslides and unstable areas shall be removed and recompacted during grading to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City's consulting geotechnical engineers. Alternatively, landslides or unstable slopes can potentially be stabilized by constructing buttress or stabilization fill slopes to reduce their potential for future down slope movement. All cut and fill slopes, foundations and structures, shall be designed and constructed to comply with Chapter 70 of the Uniform Building Code (UBC) and applicable City and /or Country Grading S:`rrnan.ty Uev . <itP ) 1 --: 1 I F ut_ons !on c r oc r)ni:.t Win u a , _ . ... ;• .2� . di�G :_: -`Ci c�7±HRti-Fi: ..•;......E7?i32-ia7:3F?t2 F3 #= '�F:_... �_....i ........... ...........................__.._______________....____ 2.._.._........_.._................._____..__....._.._....___.' 5...__.`_1 .r._..?._._5..._i3...1 . ._..l.z --- EC _ ........ _ .. ... ..._...._.........P.."...7...E _ ..._......_�_i_t_9_..F_i..f. ..:...._2.- .. ...:_- .t..a....�...F._3..5._. ., r..... ; tiiafF'FE >i3. #�. %�?_- �'- -#�t�, i�::fv'�' -ii� . z--- �-. �-- u�c :r!?ii`„.....F`t�f3fk�� # "� -�3 %3 > ... ... �__.Fr s} _ . f3c. uz. _ >vi Fit 1 k 3 ; 'r _ - t, - Fee nri tt c>t}. =r (c }t }tt.:...# c»t:i t 3 x .Y:. ._ :,.<ar}t s #':...... Modified: 0 ?; 3 ; D,4 Resolution No. - P�--2002- rn:, 7nn2_n1,T,G 2002 91 , RPD No. 2001- 4'-02 Page 33 Ordinances. Modifications to these standards shall be permitted only with the written concurrence of the City Engineer and the City's consulting geologist. C. An engineering geologist shall define the final grading requirements for residential and recreational facilities. All geological recommendations shall be reviewed and approved by the City Engineer and the City's consulting geologist. Foundation designs in areas where fault traces were identified that have been deemed inactive should address enhancing the stability of homes in the event minor movement occurs as a secondary effect of ground shaking. d. The developer shall cause an engineering geologist to study all unanticipated faults exposed during grading to detect any evidence of possible recent activity. All active fault lines will be clearly shown on the grading plan and final :ffap. No structure shall be placed within 50 feet of any fault trace. e. All habitable structures shall be designed to accommodate structural impacts from 0.128- ground acceleration or other standard factor of safety deemed applicable to this project. The standards shall be prepared to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. f. The developer shall contract with an engineering geologist to prepare grading recommendations, foundation design criteria, and other recommendations regarding detailed project design. As a component of required subsequent geologic studies, a soils engineer shall evaluate the condition of alluvium and unconsolidated soils. Relatively loose soils or alluvium shall be densified or removed and recompacted prior to placement of structures upon such soils. Other mitigation measures shall be incorporated into the final project design as required by the geological assessment. All geological recommendations shall be to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. &:`Cornun t-� De�.�elopment`�,F. D`1,7_ -`;1 2'ie > ut:.onf Conn tion:, \-ergo rgd .ond't.on:: iisa - - - ...... - " - - .i.eiX.dOi: : -'�E ti3IRIftk]Fi::� .' +...._�� eve`! )- ame�Ei�#�:.'�.i4. i t__ ..�).:- ':- civ-=— i.•,_'�P:c`5�i3 .____ ...._.... ___2 ______ g:..._- ...... ; t.; ,� < 2 \P: , a_t: *rr3 � 4: ors - \_ ,,.._ , ,..._.: ,d.....E F ��cii efll 3 --.._...._ .............._................ ...................._._.._.._.— _..---.._.._...._..._.._..................................... ...._..._....._...._._.._.._..- -.... -- - - ... -- -...._ _._.............._........... -- - - ._.._.... ,_:..._ .....:. r :..:.. . :..:::.........._..... ti4._i .ft0Y(_.,. \ %t31'.tr.iLl- H�-i:. fn. v .. -s�3 ur.n.i3... ih Modified: 0 7/03/ Resolution No. - P=- ' -2002- GPt 2002 2GG2, GI.., RPD No. 2001 -4-1-02 Page 34 g. The Developer shall submit to the City Engineer for review and approval, detailed Geotechnical Engineering Reports certified by a California Registered Civil Engineer. The Geotechnical Engineering Report shall include an investigation with regard to liquefaction, expansive soils, and seismic safety. Also, the report shall discuss the contents of the soils as to the presence or absence of any hazardous waste or other contaminants in the soils. Should additional geotechnical studies be generated or required as a result of the geotechnical investigation, additional plan check fees will be required. h. Review of the Geotechnical Engineering Report, by the City's Geotechnical Engineer, is required. The Developer shall reimburse the City for all cost including the City's administrative fee for this review. i. All recommendations included in the approved Geotechnical Engineering j. Report shall be implemented during project design, grading, and construction in accordance with the approved project. The City's geotechnical consultant shall review all plans for conformance with the soil engineer's recommendations. Prior to the commencement of grading plan check, the Developer's geotechnical engineer shall sign the plans confirming that the grading plans incorporate the recommendations of the approved soil report(s). -&-- 81 . Prior to habitable structures requirements or th requirements for the restrictive. issuance of a building permit, all shall be designed to current UBC e City approved geotechnical report project, whichever standard is most 6:82. Prior to issuance of a building permit, an as- C� ........ ............... __._ ........... _......................... graded geotechnical report and rough grading certification shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer and Geotechnical Engineer. in, v P,e. _, ourient \F, .. D \2i .:2- .l. \R solut'ons Condi.ti.ons "'reso cc - )d condi.t'.Ons u^fd. .— . -.._.. vv__ z _ c ?c'` '..{ iF( Hf tti fi.: �- {- : ;......}}�:.��... ;..c9til. _ { 3�._:....'— �r-. a.. cE it. ?- Jf3fi ..- ._;E)HE:s.._.aE3iifi -`�'ft if3..._c_.c_ Modified: 7 0.2. m -%-9 v-= .v�7�o: ;o2oif G."'/ Resolution No. - FG -2002- GP 2-002 G! ZG 2GG2 94 RPD No. 2001 -4`�02 Page 35 Street Conditions: 4-8-83. In accordance with 8771 the street improvement surveyor's statement on the recorded monuments in the located and tied out or will construction. Business and Professions Code plans shall provide for a plans, certifying that all construction area have been be protected in place during 4-1—.84....._ ............_....__.._......... _ _Monuments shall meet the City of Moorpark, County of Ventura Standards and shall be to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Mitigation of Traffic Impacts: 85. ... _ ........ _ ................... ______Prior to the first Zoning Clearance for residential unit building permit, Developer shall pay a fair -share contribution for intersection improvements for Los Angeles Avenue /Moorpark Avenue, Los Angeles Avenue /Spring Road and Spring Road /High Street. The level of fair -share participation is based upon the traffic analysis prepared for the Archstone Apartment project at a sixty percent (600) value. Street Requirements: -3-86. The Developer shall submit to the City of Moorpark for review and approval, street improvement plans prepared by a California Registered Civil Engineer; shall enter into an agreement with the City of Moorpark to complete public improvements; and shall post sufficient surety guaranteeing the construction of all improvements. Public streets shall conform to City of Moorpark requirements including all applicable ADA requirements. Street improvements shall be acceptable to the City Engineer and Director of Community Development 4.A.-...8...'.7 ........... ..... ............................... ............................All streets shall conform to the design requirements of the Ventura County Road Standards (most recent revision and as modified), unless noted otherwise in the Conditions. S:'•Comrnnit.v Pe =. =eloor:tent. \F. P.`•.ZC!C1_- C2`•,F.esolutions Condit. ions'., so cc rod conditions usa ........................._................................................. ...... :....................................._':'.._....._..............._........................__.._................................................................................................................=:..°..................................... .................................... ........ .................. .................... fir oc > >Y . .......,....... ' .... a r_ .(7 :.,.L hiRiRti A::. #:. f)Ffi`F:itir I±ic`A – �f -- i3• -_ti ii:: —cr -= ;- c`.`,4' rtH vFi S_...bc7F3c ? -s: s:tir33.S.., C.S. .....c'. .....:r.K........ ._e .firIiv?:. ...�JFi�5 tt`.;- i2- wf1FaF :- >�C.�.a ; >ctp...�> .a :. p ....... ^ , • i :in C, �•• r n e a' a ,.�i`$;itti.;.�.t.:y._._L��. t.t.l_itt �?,..._- ...._£= i,!cit—�+�i , f?; E> 5:.- tkt:__ ...i.�.._....�.>i33���_!�i.3`a. .. �........ ��.. ....��EF..._E'E.ftEF- t ti.,s.,�1....Ei Yt' - • f;ewfffunf , #;_' d-v � =._.it t-:tc3fi:i__ E> 17(a f c.r 1, _._etla- ti0F3:i.U:i _ Modified: 07/.0 3 / Resolution No. -Pt -2002- rsl?A 2GG2 G4.,ZG2, 2 ... , R P D No. 2001-4-1-02 Page 36 Pedestrian facilities shall meet all City and ADA requirements, shall be safe from vehicular traffic along Park Lane, Park Crest Lane and Los Angeles Avenue. Prior to approval of the improvement plans, Developer shall submit an ADA access exhibit to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. The exhibit shall denote how ADA access throughout the public right of way shall be accomplished. /x-89. The street improvements shall include concrete curb and gutter, sidewalk, landscaped parkways, streetlights, signing, striping, interim striping and traffic control, repaving and paving, and any necessary transitions, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. The City Engineer and the Director of Community Development shall approve all driveway locations. The Developer shall dedicate or acquire any additional right -of -way necessary to make all of the required improvements. 4.90 . _.- __.._ ................ ......._. _ ---Entry monumentation that does not interfere with sight- distance or turning movements shall be incorporated into the project entrance planning. Landscaping shall be provided appropriate to the entry that will not interfere with sight- distance or turning movement operations. The final design for the project entrance shall be reviewed and approved by the City Community Development Department Director and the City Engineer prior to the issuance of building permits. Park T,ane 91. From the project site to Los Angeles Avenue, Park Lane shall be constructed per modified Ventura County Standard Plate B -3 -C, 68 feet right -of -way; containing 52 feet of roadway (curb face to curb face), 8 feet wide parkways containing 5 feet wide sidewalks located 6 inches from the right -of -way. This will include all portions of existing Park Lane that do not conform to this cross section. Developer shall demonstrate conformance to A.D.A. access requirements at all locations including driveway locations. An ADA plan shall be reviewed, approved by the City Engineer and held on file to show conformance to those S •'.•Common t Deve'. r e _._.._��rt........ T.,,,2:..,.:2- C: ?.....F.eso_ut ons CondLt-.ons.,_eso cc -pd cond..t_onr oraa. "y e 4 . r.' o c ; ri._ :....,......3rzse s: 3nrrrt.. ,.} ; ,:i t} # r i.�. E �r ..ci : t ._:n.s..., ..e.S 3 i :,._...:. x...._ert3r- ... #.._.. ,t t s ........... . ...... ............................:........ a................_.. ............__....__.._.. - - ---- - ____.. _.._................._.... - -.._ ....____.._____.--._._.._..__.._...........___....._......._.... ......_....__.................. <a ' E> r: �. �.. �...\,. fi. �.> isii` it2f.3:...# �,;. 1...... �; ��. c-. �.>. tji 3f9E' fi� #:- �-F?—= '._- ��:.zi::ivi. —*i' �? ncH��t} �# ��f3< �,`-..... fi. �3% 3�����- �E3 %2S�.s:f,>cE� >.....E":, Fez...... F •.�Ei��_-�!i`E3f�3B�� #��_E3i35� ...... ......: ,_C...._L ..... - -. r r ...::.::... ; .....: :... .. .« : ._..:'._... 1_n ^ —ci.^ ..�tf';ic9iii- iii }Ei.....iE9f3 :f._:...:..E i3.;._ ..._: e. nt :i.:i.. -... ,:..tj.'........., >t #3C.. V{ _t}kifftE-H i:.� -1t _ �} , ... v v - f {, } s � � siT � . �. .Jf. c. } 4_ i -a .s Modified: 7 i0' j02 . Resolution No. -�= = -2002- 2002 2GG2 _01 No. 11 Page 37 requirements. Improvement plans will detail all locations where utilities or other improvements conflict with normal walk locations and that the plans conform to the City's requirements. Developer shall reconstruct any broken sidewalk, curb and gutter, and street pavement from the project site to Los Angeles Avenue and repave any portions of Park Lane to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Street sections shall be designed for a 50 -year life. 4-9- 9.2................ _ _ Driveways shall be designed in accordance with the latest APWA Standards. 48.- ..3 .......................... _ _ Above ground obstructions (utility cabinets, mailboxes, etc.) are to be placed within the right -of -way landscaping areas. When above ground obstructions are to be placed within the sidewalk, a minimum five (5) feet clear sidewalk width must be provided around the obstruction. IT74—.94. The Developer shall submit wall and landscaping plans showing that provisions have been taken to provide for and maintain proper sight distances. All fences, walls and other structures over six (6) feet high are to be submitted to and approved by the Director of Community Development and the City Engineer. X95. Any right -of -way acquisition necessary to complete the required improvements shall be acquired by the Developer at his his /herexpense. Street Liahtina Conditions: 44--96. Streetlights shall be provided on the improvement plans per Ventura County Standards and as approved by the City Engineer. Prior to final FRap i=eeeTeiatienissuance of zoning clearance for the first residential building permit, the Developer shall pay all energy costs associated with public street lighting for a period of one year from the acceptance of the street improvements. Drainage Requirements: • eve , :.. ,..:ntriunr.ty L..........ar:.i,.nt`,Fi L',LUOL -OL ,F.e- n_ut.i.onS (`,nI1C1 =t_onr eso as cnnctr.T.r.ons usa ............................................................ ..... ........._.................._..................................................................................._..-- ..... _.........:.:.............................................. ...... ......... ....._.................................................. ...._................................................... ............................... Modified: 07j Resolution No. - P`: -2002- GP 2092 2992 Gl No. 2 Page 38 _4.9 The applicant shall make a pro -rata contribution to the mitigation of cumulative regional drainage deficiencies consistent with the remediation programs proposed in the Drainage Deficiency Study adopted by the City. If a formal fee program to implement required drainage improvements is not adopted at the time of project approval, the applicant's pro -rata contribution to funding required regional improvements shall be included in the project Development Agreement. Payment of negotiated drainage improvement fees shall be required prior to issuance of building permits. .-- .-98._ _ _ _ The Developer shall submit to the City of Moorpark for review and approval, drainage plans; hydrologic and hydraulic calculations prepared by a California Registered Civil Engineer; shall enter into an agreement with the City of Moorpark to complete improvements and shall post sufficient surety guaranteeing the construction of all improvements. X99. The plans shall depict all on -site and off -site drainage structures required by the City. X100. The drainage plans and calculations shall relate ........... _ .... ................. _....................._.............. ............................._. _ to conditions before and after development. Quantities of water, water flow rates, major watercourses, drainage areas and patterns, diversions, collection systems, flood hazard areas, sumps, sump locations, detention and NPDES facilities and drainage courses will be addressed. -,Q�.101. Hydrology shall be per the current Ventura County Flood Control Standards except as follows: a. All storm drains shall carry a 10 -year frequency storm. b. All catch basins shall carry a 10 -year storm. C. All catch basins in a sump condition shall be sized such that depth of water at intake shall equal the depth of the approach flows. d. All culverts shall carry a 100 -year frequency storm. g;' "'Cor•.uiunity Devei opment`,F. D' L;Jij1.- i;;L`",F.e o- utions C;ond;.t_ons \- re.,-.o cc; ad cond_tion : u::a ...............:.:...................._._......._._.-__._..........._............. _......._....._........_._._...._................_...._............--....____........................._.........................................................._...._.._.._...._..........__....`....°..._.._ ................... ......._........................._...._................. ..........._................... . e . doi.::: V(,irftNtti3 ti, die S Cr. }. t} yOF }5 C;frAfi -lt S- 1 tic. i3.... E2E3G' -; +�F•fitiiitti3 .t.:i�- ._ { . Fai t;if:X13.t.. '.« 5. .,,..._lot,, ......r_UCk..._t-tf il4 t��- ..._ :............._......_._. ___...._..._._..._......... _...........__....._..._..._.._..__..._.__............_ ............................._. _ ___.___ ____ _ ........._.. _. -__ _.......... ............................__. ............. .........._ {}:r :x. {1th_... .E.cH.ti.t}}f}_{; 43E Vt -s c)'t3.Re Fi :: -�{i _ ii1_vii_ vim. �iEC'.n }_H = <if3.ri._i<••, - 8t' };'i- 4_- e.E }.J._.f:.. '......x�-- UEl.._.c? f}f i..#":..::.c3f}s--IAs.a- Modified: 07/0:/10'8 Resolution No. �- -2002- GPA 2092 G1, ZG 2GG2 G3 RPD No. 2001 --6402 Page 39 x-102. Surface flows shall be intercepted, detained and given sufficient time to provide storm water clarification by "passive" BMP systems prior to entering collector or storm drain systems. This shall be clearly shown on the improvement plans and shall be to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. � -103. Under a 10 -year frequency storm, local, residential and private streets shall have one dry travel lane available on interior residential streets. Collector streets shall have a minimum of two dry travel lanes in each direction. 4-- 1..0 <I. "After- development" drainage to adjacent parcels shall not be increased above "Pre- development" drainage quantities nor will surface runoff be concentrated by this development. All drainage measures necessary to mitigate storm water flows shall be provided to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. X105. Drainage grates shall not be used at any location ................._.........._. ................... _...... . accessible by pedestrian, bicycle or equestrian traffic. x:106. The grading plan shall also show contours indicating the 50- and 100 -year flood levels based on the latest and best information available. 44—.10 7. All flows that have gone through flow attenuation and clarification by use of acceptable BMP systems and are flowing within brow ditches, ribbon gutters, storm drain channels, area drains and similar devices shall be deposited directly into the storm drain system and shall be restricted from entering streets. If necessary, the storm drain system shall be extended to accept these flows. Both storm drains and easements outside the public right -of -way are to be privately maintained unless otherwise approved by the City Council. x:103. Concrete surface drainage structures exposed to the public view, shall be tan colored concrete, as approved by the Community Development Director, and to the extent S : ,C.nrtr:.nzn: tv L....,' ctartenT.`...R L 1 1. ,.:2 .,F... cation Conai t- onr e:,o :.d c:ond Y. ork:> u:; a. _N -{t25c�-i:t3-si3Fi :i..._( i3Fif:- i-#�:- : -i3Ft5 ............................................................................ 2..........................................____..____..____..__.._......._._.........._....______________.._........_........................__..___.............._........................................_____________.._______._.._.._..________ ___..__......___..........___.. . �>} Ttkktt3 . fii:it- x- ti:ee�.......� c }TiHRiit3-- t.'— .{}f`Vi' leprfte�t— il__i}: =vv� "-v= '- ftc'.': }cYi..73. ..t c }i}:i- -fic }i }E3 ......................._...................._.........-_._..__.___._._.. 1;.... ............_..............._�. _........__._.....__..._._.__.._..._....._ ' "-_..._...._.........._.._._ —.......... Modified: 07;0: %0 Resolution No. - FG -2002- GPt� 2G G2 91, ,�GPG nom- U I.. , -RP D No. 2 0 01 -A9-1-0 2." Page 40 possible shall incorporate natural structure and landscape to reduce their visibility. 4-6-109. In order to comply with Quality Control Board requirement allowed for pad drainage onto the agreement shall be recorded and owner. California Regional Water s no curb outlets will be street. This notification enforced by the property �47 -.110. Drainage devices for the development shall be designed and installed with all necessary appurtenances to safely contain and convey storm flows to their final point of discharge to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 1. A hydraulic /hydrologic study shall be prepared which analyzes the hydraulic capacity of the drainage system, with and without the storm drain system for the proposed development. The Developer shall make any downstream improvements, required by the City, to support the proposed development. 4-9 -:112. Improvements shall be constructed to detain drainage on -site when the drainage amount is between the ten -year and fifty -year storm event. A rainfall intensity Zone K shall be utilized in the design unless alternate design intensity is approved by the City Engineer. X1..1.3. The Developer shall demonstrate, for each ........._..... building pad within the development area, that the following restrictions and protections can be put in place to the satisfaction of the City Engineer: a. Adequate protection from a 100 -year frequency storm; b. Feasible access during a 50 -year frequency storm. C. Hydrology calculations shall be per current Ventura County Flood Control Standards. d. All structures proposed within the 100 -year flood zone shall be elevated at least one foot above the 100 -year flood level. S:\Conimunity Deve'.oament`__ I_ \..... _2- 1;l.',•F.eso'utior7:: Conr_.t.ions`.•reso rr.. rpd condr.t.ons usa t...�...:.t ... ..a..___- fi3eemu .- fk "v,«3.} d, .. ...._.... - - - - .. v :5 i tie___....._...........__.. -.. Modified: Resolution No. - P- :: -2002- GPt7 2992 GI.- ZG 2902 91,-RPD No. 2001 -$i02 Page 41 14114. The Developer shall provide for all necessary on- site and off -site storm drain facilities to the satisfaction of the City Engineer to accommodate upstream and on -site flows. Facilities, as shown on existing drainage studies and approved by the City Engineer, shall be delineated on the final drainage plans. Either on -site detention basins or storm water acceptance deeds from off - site property owners must be specified. x.115. The design of the storm drain system shall provide for adequate width easements for future maintenance and reconstruction of facilities particularly those facilities that are deeper than 8 feet. In addition all facilities shall have all- weather vehicular access. This design shall be to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 444_.116. Engineering and geotechnical reports shall be provided to prove, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer, that all "passive" NPDES facilities meet their intended use and design. These facilities shall meet the minimum requirements relating to water retention and clarification. —11I The Developer shall demonstrate and certify to the satisfaction of the City Engineer that all existing storm drain culverts within the site shall perform in an acceptable manner based on their intended design and the proposed increase /decrease of loading conditions, introduction of surface water within subsurface areas that may affect the culvert and proposed construction. This especially includes cast -in -place concrete pipe (CIPP). National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System ( NPDES) Requirements: -1- x.118. Prior to the issuance of any construction /grading permit and /or the commencement of any clearing, grading or excavation, the Developer shall submit a Storm Water Pollution Control Plan (SWPCP) to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. • `Icomniumi tv L }eve .opment`,•F, U`.,20U1- ,.2`.,Eieso= ut.ions Conditions \reeo cc rpd cond -Lt ions usa ..eq.a.... ;t;cx rei --r--t l � :eia raentl is E3 r= kesr,.:.t }t�o�s Lct�ti�i .ins ,reso ec umi - rrAiti&ris ustz. d., ,S: it rtttttt # v x t atrili? i. \ i� � �r� �li?e f tzt' r• iic# 4 i�: ,. t i-iiitHtt#ft�-'t .5e> ti�# 47t)_fi'.i- -- �c3iif:�i -n- 'cries= r�fi�9J....c c— �_:)E:t– c'c }f3Ef.:i..#- Modified: 07/03/028 Resolution No. - P-, -2002- G A 202 01, -z:.G 2G G2 G;.., RPD No. 2001 -4--'-02 Page 42 14-6-. The SWPCP shall be developed and implemented in accordance with requirements of the Ventura Countywide Storm Water Quality Management Program, NPDES Permit No. CAS004002. 19q-120. The SWPCP shall identify potential pollutant sources that may affect the quality of discharges to storm water and shall include the design and placement of recommended Best Management Practices (BMFts) to effectively prohibit the entry of pollutants from the construction site into the storm drain system. 1..E...........121. Improvement plans shall note that the contractor shall comply to the "California Storm Water Best Management Practice Handbooks." X99- 1.22... Prior to the issuance of any construction /grading ......._..._ ..............._......._.._......_.............. ............_...._......_....._ __ permit and /or the commencement of any clearing, grading or excavation, the Developer shall also submit a Notice of Intent (NOI) to the California State -Water Resources Control Board, Storm Water Permit Unit in accordance with the NPDES Construction General Permit (No. CASQ00002): Waste Discharge Requirements for Discharges of Storm Water Runoff Associated with Construction Activities). The Developer shall comply with all requirements of this General Permit including preparation of a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan ( SWPPP). .=.- 1..23. The Developer shall obtain a permit from the State Water Resources Control Board for "All storm water discharges associated with a construction activity where clearing, grading, and excavation results in land disturbances of five or more acres." The Developer shall submit a copy of the Notice of Intent (NOI) to the City Engineers office as proof of permit application. x-124. The Developer shall also comply with NPDES objectives as outlined in the `Storm Water Pollution Control Guidelines for Construction Sites." -x.125. provide 5: \Co muri' tv Devel _Prior to Grading Plan approval, Developer will facilities to comply with NPDES requirements. ment \,P, P D\121;:.,2- ^2`.,Peso_ut .oris Coriditione.: \re >o cc xi conch .ons usa U fi:..: L{ ir'..:>_•..} �cH ?N {tk31"i.:...#:..:3......fsi: Vc'i- c3t3lftFi3- ��Ft' -� -- F3� -`'. ,, iiz: Ei Ji: ti f>Ei.,i..... f>i3{'t:±..# c }i };s - "roc 5i>- -c .._.. :.i3E3_...- C- enE3st" , &fls......tl i 1 ............._ 1._. 'T� m ^t Modified: Resolution No. - P- O -2002- GPA 2092 n' , nn 2992_GI.._RPD No. 2001 -4-' 02 Page 43 Runoff from developed areas shall be diverted to detention basins, "passive- devices" or other passive Best Management Practices (RD3P'sBMPs) to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. A California registered civil engineer shall propose and design these devices as part of the drainage improvement plans for the project. Provisions shall be made by the Developer to provide for maintenance in perpetuity. 412.6. Prior to City issuance of the initial grading permit, the applicant shall obtain all necessary NPDES related permits. The grading permits issued for the development shall require applicant to provide schedules and procedures for onsite maintenance of earthmoving and other heavy equipment and documentation of proper disposal of used oil and other lubricants. The onsite maintenance of all equipment that can be performed offsite will not be allowed. 4-34 12 "i'. The project construction plans shall state that the contractor shall comply with the "California Storm Water Best Management Practice Handbooks" - Best Management Practices (BMPs) applicable to the development and to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Said requirements shall include the following: a. All onsite storm drain inlets shall be labeled "Don't Dump Drains to Arroyo." b. No outdoor vehicle maintenance shall be allowed. C. All common area property locations shall be maintenance free of litter and debris. d. All onsite storm drains shall be cleaned, using approved methods, at least twice a year, once immediately prior to October 1, the rainy season, and once in January. e. All common sidewalks, walkways, and parking areas shall be swept regularly to prevent the accumulation of litter and debris from entering the storm drain. n Cond=tions....\..._ r : ..s..._o .._ _....c.....cS: \!orirznity Peve-opment,F. D`, ..............................._..... .............................._............. .__.....................................s........0 ........._......... .... )d r..cuid .bons usa ................................. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . \.�1,...._i1.....SL.;. \_yt f.Zl. " \..I ea,4i" }}. t..- F:. a�. ��__.. �. Hr" 1�_ �a:" l�.r"iS "�T- �Y��f�J'f:.l-- .{.xt� - r- �t�'.._I.Yi.:;...t.I1_ 1i. ;.y . ...._ ................._......__ ___._........ J..._—___._...._____.................................. .._......_._.._____— ___-- ...._. _____ __ _ _._...._ —_ _ —__ ._— _ _ _.._._..........__.___..___. _ ....... ...._... 9, Vc__J%>rfte iFt \k _ fr _ ,•," ... .... Modified: 07 '03 0? " ' Resolution No. 44-,-2002- GPt� 2992 91,ZC 290 ,-RPD No. 2001- £-4-02 .., Page 44 f. No cleaning agent must be discharged into a storm drain system. If any cleaning agent or degreaser is used, wash water shall not be discharged to the storm drain but shall be discharged to the sanitary sewer. Discharges to the sanitary sewer are subject to the review and approval of the County Waterworks District No. 1. g. The City will require that "passive" devices and ];P4P= sBMa -Ps be used to comply with NPDES water quality . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . — _ _ requirements. The Developer shall provide the City with a Maintenance Program for such devices. The CC &R's shall include a requirement that the Developer /HOA shall maintain, in perpetuity, such devices in a manner consistent with specific requirements to be detailed within the Maintenance Program. x.128. Prior to the starting of grading or any ground disturbance the Developer shall employ a full -time superintendent for NPDES compliance. The NPDES superintendent shall have no other duties than NPDES compliance, shall be present, on the project site Monday through Friday and on all other days when the probability of rain is 40o or higher and prior to the start of and during all grading or clearing operations until the release of grading bonds. The NPDES superintendent shall have full authority to hire personnel, bind the developer in contracts, rent equipment and purchase materials to the extent needed to effectuate Best Management Practices. The NPDES superintendent shall provide proof to the City Engineer of attendance and satisfactory completion of courses satisfactory to the City Engineer totaling no less than 8 hours directed specifically to NPDES compliance and effective use of Best Management Practices. Proof of such attendance and completion shall be provided to the City Engineer prior to employment to the NPDES superintendent. In addition, an NPDES superintendent shall be employed to assume NPDES compliance during the construction of streets, S: \Community Development \R P D \20 2- !.2�\Reso'ut ons Condition,\ so rr. rpd (,,,.)lid' :::._........_.._.......-......... .............................._...................._....._-..............-.........._..:...._...._._..........:..._.........._....__.............................................................................._......_..........-.......-..........:.:_°................._.-:-.......... ..... ........................... ..... us: l ,.;......iF >r =i =ct�r� # ... F} >ve e x rtt i..R......_z.....f3 ,. Modified: Resolution No. - 1-G-2002- GPI- 2GO2 91,Z,--, 2GO2 Gs�RPD NO. 2001 -£402 Page 45 storm drainage systems, all utilities, buildings and final landscaping of the site. Acquisition of Easements and Right of Way: 116. 129. required installed title o applicant prior to approval _If any of the improvements which t to construct or install is to be upon land in which the applicant .e applicant is constructed or does not have r interest sufficient for such purposes, the shall do all of the following at least 60 days the filling of the final or parcel map for pursuant to Governmental Code Section 66457: a. Notify the City of Moorpark (hereinafter City) in writing that the applicant wishes the City to acquire an interest in the land, which is sufficient for the purposes as provided in Governmental Code Section 66462.5. b. Supply the City with: (i) a legal description of the interest to be acquired, (ii) a map or diagram of the interest to be acquired sufficient to satisfy the requirements of subdivision (e) of Section 1250.310 of the Code of Civil procedure, (iii) a current appraisal report prepared by an appraiser approved by the City which expresses an opinion as to the fair market value of the interest to be acquired, and (iv) a current Litigation Guarantee Report. C. Enter into an agreement with the City, guaranteed by such cash deposits or other security as the City may require, pursuant to which the applicant will pay all of the City's cost (including, without limitation, attorney's fees and overhead expenses) of acquiring such an interest in the land. Prior to Issuance of a Zone Clearance for A Building Permit, the following conditions shall be satisfied: 4.44--.130 _ ........._ . ............................... _.Prior to issuance of a building permit, all habitable structures shall be designed to current UBC requirements or the City approved geotechnical report S:`,Commun5.ty Deveioment',R P D ',2:1:';2- C: ?..`.•F.eso.utions Cenciit.ons \res:o rnci conditions uea ..........................................._ ............................... ._.........._.._..__.._._....._.._......................................................._........__................._..........._......._._......_...__._.............................................................. S:. S:........._:.................................................... ............................... >f8i't13I? ';-- flrlr2 �3 ixtc`,`E3 #'� .:p:_..._�_....� }1 , k25�irt3 - ?-Sri.5._..t t3rxf ? -2_# _' — <4i:t - �; -x.r.g 3....- ea -.'-. 0-i _.. <?irrx E:3:#.:- ?.—ens ........_.__........._..—___________ ................__............... 1...................____...._._............___........_...__. .......... ..... ...... ._..___....................--------________________ ..... _......._.__....._.._.._..._____...._.___....__...__........_......_._....._..__....________...._. .....__........................ :.._�..._..D\ 4 42— *_ *i- 4_- _a3i- tt'�i- 9Fi`✓ -_.. }ffS_ .....:..........:..._..--_____......._.._.._.._............................................. ...._.._....______.______....._ _ _ ....... . r ..c ,�-- crn -c.. `3F }Ei— c }%}Ei =i-1 c3F }E3..�.x fu3.d.._. ,. ,___ `%1C3- _c..cYI3{3... {� ..�..c...... ......mss.:} Eii) c�. C-:' HrHxtti. H.: �..{:.. x-- .._f3' }�Vci..:.i)F3Lt`_.i3 #���h _ �_.xi-�-. hf"oc'�' Modified: 07103/0) Resolution No. - E-G-2002- GPA - 2G'"'� -01.,Z 802 01, RPD NO. 2001 -4101' Page 46 requirements for the project, whichever standard is most restrictive. Prior to Issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the Following Conditions shall be Satisfied: 118.131. If directed by the City, the Developer shall have repaired, _ eicl y overlaid or slurried that portion of Park Lane and Park Crest Lane adjacent to the development damaged as a result of project related construction work or utility trenching. The repairs, curb replacement, parkways, sidewalks, and overlay or slurry of the street, as a result of damage from construction work or utility trenching shall be along the entire length of the project including transitions unless otherwise approved and shall be completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 44-9:132. A final grading certification shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer. Prior to Acceptance of Public Improvements and Bond Exonerations, the Following Conditions shall be satisfied: 2{i -133. Reproducible centerline tie sheets shall be submitted to the City Engineer's office. 4-2--1.1.34. Sufficient surety in a form and in an amount acceptable to the City guaranteeing the public improvements shall be provided, and shall remain in place for one year following acceptance by the City. x:13. Original "as built" plans shall be certified by the Developer's Registered Civil Engineer and submitted with two sets of blue prints to the City Engineer's office. These "as built" plans shall incorporate all plan revisions. Although grading plans may have been submitted for checking and construction on sheets larger than 22" X 36 ", they shall be resubmitted as "record drawings" in a series of 22" X 36" mylars (made with proper overlaps) with a title block on each sheet. Submission of "as built" plans is required before a final inspection is scheduled. c: \Community Development \F. P D \2CG1- :;2'•,F.eso'.ut_ons Condi.ti.ons \r so rnd conditions usa .......... ................ ... ..... .................. ........ .n........._.......`_..i ..._. _ _ .............. ... __.... .._._..... _.............................. ........_... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . e� . do : b- :-tb7zzffgtzz} -i.. _.;.._..I3e� =e:i.�,r}z rx.t.- R....._a..... }} Q ;k2�a: tzt �ry.s.. E >tif:.::# }r3.4..,..:r�.s a ... ^e.....:x.a _.._ a�i ._ _.�..z:�t�s iF Fait' 1itf. 2:._.,......;;. w..>.: i.. f., i3f` i< �33#":,- EZ— u_.- a:_ f;:;_;.._,• y:... . °SB= '��3fi`3_..fiE, > %TEt_..t..= 335_: cc..._ F, f�.....x.:Ei— �!�f3c"f3.3_`�335- Ue3..,.f3.i)v ... .1 Ci)itiiRHH # .}}(„d. ..i:iiiititciti: �. r—ic _= �'�r'-vvi v he :ii} iii #. if}H:i— Cc }Ht1i iC }it& c}H i_-i3 rat Modified: 0 7; 0 ; %0. ^.^ Resolution No. 4:-G-2002- CP-1° 2902 01,9G 200�2 Gl -, —RPD No. 2001 -£4-02 Page 47 Electronic files shall be submitted for all improvement plans in a format to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. In addition, Developer shall provide an electronic file update on the City's Master Base Map electronic file, incorporating all storm drainage, water and sewer mains, lines and appurtenances and any other utility facility available for this project. D. FIRE DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS: -1"36. Prior to combustible construction, an all weather access road /driveway suitable for use by a 20 ton Ventura County Fire Protection District (Fire District) vehicle shall be installed. x;131. All access roads /driveways shall have a minimum vertical clearance of 13 feet 6 inches (13'6 "). x:138. Approved turnaround areas for fire apparatus shall be provided when dead -end Fire District access roads /driveways exceed 150 feet. Turnaround areas shall not exceed a 2.5% cross slope in any direction and shall be located within 150 feet of the end of the access road /driveway. -139. Public and private roads shall be named if serving more than four (4) parcels. 7- 1.fa0.... ---..--Prior to recordation of street names, proposed names shall be submitted to the Fire District's Communications Center for review. 8 -141. Street name signs shall be installed in conjunction with the road improvements. The type of sign shall be in accordance with City of Moorpark Road Standards. -1-%9 -142. Address numbers, a minimum of 8 inches high, shall be installed prior to occupancy, shall be of contrasting color to the background, and shall be readily visible at night. Where structures are set back more than 150 feet from the street, larger numbers will be required so that they are distinguishable from the street. In the S: `Communi.ty Deve .opment` F, L "., "2.;1;:;1- ,- 1`:,Reso .uti.cuis Cond= bons \ -- so cc rad r..ondi t.i.ons usa ............................................................................................_._.. ......_......................._ '.................................................................................................................................... .............................._ _.....:..°........_..........................:.................................._................ ............................... _ .t..._..._.)nn„ nn, .,. - eo. aoc ;...- (.3rttrr:ir::_t.,.... {3r <,�rri.t...,..,_..._: E3.__t,t.:- ,.,.... krs:zt�# t,r: t,3ri�:,..tz rrs: 2.s..._c e .... - \-G cLu �t . vt r xtc �.t -� R .__ _.........._ ................. ..............._.._...._— ._.._? ....__.._._.._....................................... ..............................- -._.._.........._... ........_...................... -...._..._..........__...._.—_.._....... ........................_.._... ...._...........................:........._.... ........._......._...._........ Peve=eefaent�R IF P�2GG G2 eonf i_ �Tsa Modified: 07/03 •01G*-rG 3 G... 2 Resolution No. - R:= -2002- GP-A 2092 0-�T 2902 0-1-,-RPD No. 2001 -4-4-02 Page 48 event, the structure(s) is not visible from the street, the address number(s) shall be posed adjacent to the driveway entrance. —143. A plan shall be submitted to the Fire District for review indicating the method in which buildings are to be identified by address numbers. 144 _Prior to construction, the applicant shall submit plans to the Fire District for placement of fire hydrants. On plans, show existing hydrants within 500 feet of the development. Indicate the type of hydrant, number and size of outlets. 1-3-2-145. prior to minimum Manual. _Fire hydrants shall be installed and in service combustible construction and shall conform to the standards of the City of Moorpark Water Works a. Each hydrant shall be a 6 -inch wet barrel design and shall have one (1) 4 inch and one (1) 2 1/2 -inch outlet. b. The required fire flow shall be achieved at no less than 20psi residual pressure. C. Fire hydrants shall be spaced 500 feet on center, and so located that no structure will be farther than 250 feet from any one hydrants. d. Fire hydrants shall be set back from the curb face 24 inches on center. e. No obstructions, including walls, trees, light and sign posts, meter, and shall be placed within three (3) feet of any hydrant. f. A contract pad shall be installed extending 18 inches out from the fire hydrant. g. Ground clearance to the lowest operating nut shall be between 18 to 24 inches. 133.14 Prior to occupancy of any structure, blue ..... ............................._. reflective hydrant location marketers shall be placed on - `.P.es:a'.ut.ons _,��na.t.ons`.reso ad cond-.tion:; u:; a. s:\conunun-ity L� 1. ��;�rient. �, F, .................... .T ... I'.`, 1.".'-'. 1.....". 2.... a..._...._ .............................................................................................__...__.......__.__......_._.............._._._........_.........................._...._ _.............................. Modified: O'l 0 3 j U 2 0:7 % G: ' 2 ^^ ' C � —"�� Resolution No. -P4 -2002- GPA 2rn2_G1,9ti -_ 2992 9 RPD NO. 2001 -4-1-02 Page 49 the access roads in accordance with Fire District standards. If the final asphalt cap is not in place at time of occupancy, hydrant location markers shall still be installed and shall be replaced when the final asphalt cap is completed. -13 4 -14 °7 . _Prior to nn:p r-eeer -E4 storage of combusti-ble materials, the applicant shall provide to the Fire District, verification from the water purveyor that the purveyor can provide the required fire flow of 1,000 gallons per minute at 20 psi. 4­3-�140. Any structure greater than 5,000 square feet in area and /or 5 miles from a fire station shall be provided with an automatic fire sprinkler system in accordance with current Fire District Ordinance. ",149. Plans for all fire submitted, with payment for District for review and approval sprinkler systems shall be plan check, to the Fire prior to installation. = �-�7-: "150 . Applicant shall submit a phasing plan to the Fire Department for review and approval prior to construction. 4-3-8-151. A copy of all feeefdi.edi. •the recorded lot line adjustment /lot merger shall be provided to District within seven (7) days of recordation l..i_ne adjustment /.lot merger_. the Fire of said lot E. VENTURA COUNTY WATERWORKS DISTRICT NO. 1 CONDITIONS: 1,99.1S2. Prior to issuance of a building permit, provide ................. _................. _........... _......... _....... _................... _......... _. _. Ventura County Waterworks District the following: a. Water and sewer improvement plans in the format required. b. Hydraulic analysis by a registered Civil Engineer to determine the adequacy of the proposed and existing water and sewer lines. C. Copy of approval of fire hydrant locations by County of Ventura Fire Protection District. S:'r`nrtrrunity Lez. oortent`,,F '' D`,1. :;;1_ I',Re::o ut_on: Cnnd:.t:.on:: \reso c: c: -pd nnit n: lz;ra. d00. ftiIFN!ili'FY t; DeiF,I- mH:K:F3t R :� i) GG 7.. -Re,&0 -1-11 tie'FYS C.ti'1`tEi2�.i'in4 ",'.`Y`.5,- ti' 'a�_'if] -&B -d 't ?F-1s, .__...._ i _....'....__ - - .___ _.... .................... _.. ... . .. G C F•_ fl f G 4zf t�sa � ci!�'� t Pte.. _ -_� � . 3_ :..i�.t.:..'3i�3..._..._f.?fi.3 � -�'_ . f2S.. _F:. >.. 3.__E'.E� _...r•£�f}- .. ?%3Ei��t- i -!3f?9 cici =— i=r_..,..Ft'c --so" �rr:i__.Ei3i� "zm_- �rvfi.y.. _� -:.r� • }.-:? c:>_._��3- c�c }HE3.3 -#:= s1- ?2�i�Ei...._}1.,��.s. Modified: 0'7/03%0 Resolution No. - PG, -2002- Rp.A _2992_r1 ZG3 2GG2 - 0-z —RPD NO. 2001 -4-1.-02 Page 50 d. Copy of Release from Calleguas Municipal Water District. e. Cost estimates for water and sewer improvements. f. Fees: Plan check, construction inspection, capital improvement charge, sewer connection fee and water meter charge. g. Signed Contract to install all improvements and a Surety Bond. F.--VENTURA COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT CONDITIONS: 444�-155. No direct storm drain connections to Ventura County Flood Control District facilities will be allowed without appropriate Best Management Practices (RP4P's-BMPs) for compliance with Ventura Countywide Stormwater Program. 41. -1..54 Cross Connection Control Devices: At the time water service connection is made, cross connection control devices shall be installed on the water system in a manner approved by the County Waterworks District No. 1. G. VENTURA COUNTY TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS: Prior to j ..ssuance of a Zoning Clearance fo.r a building Permit_ for each residential unit within the boundaries of the Residential Planned Development, Developer shall pay a County of Ventura t.raf.fic i.rn.pact fee. The fee shall be paid at tree rate in _i _la'.=.:e........._a_t. the time of — -._._.._..........._..._....._. ...._.._....__.......__._..._.. ..........................._ . ......................_..._.... -- issuance of each blildina hermit, accordance with the a oli_ca "lle reciprocal_ aareerner:t between. the Counts and the City of Moor -nark. FIi— POLICE DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS: 4-4- -:156. Construction equipment, tools, etc. shall be properly secured to prevent theft during non - working hours. 4-4_.157. All appliances (microwave ovens, dishwashers, trash compactors, etc.) shall be properly secured prior to installation to prevent theft during non - working hours. "� U i. .,�r.rnxzx:.t t`.. =. Urtent ... D •,1..•'..L ,.,1 •,R� > ut onr: C`nncx t n _ cX pncz t ohs usa .r.doc^..:.:;Ux r t�rj.z#.•_.._)e� :e ,rn2ri� 1._,-_ '.:;Frse= :�s#:iri.s..._(crst:.t «n.5 , es7 <r.... .................... -- _ _._._._._.....___. - - -- ... .._.. .._...... - tt4c <-_e�> �t >ttuttttti_i k3e c.. -3t #- ic> tr {_.. crxs..Eu.t {.. { -s )rrs•.=r4H...__ °c:-- tit3..c c>fitsi cF3:i Modified: 07: 3; a "s Y.B, 4 Resolution No. -LIG-2002- GPA 2GG2 91,Z,--, 2nGP__ nI RPD NO. 2001 -4-1-02 Page 51 —15 R_ . If an alarm system is used, it shall be wired to all exterior doors, windows, roof vents or other roof openings where access may be made. x.159. Directory Boards indicating the location of the various buildings and individual units will be displayed at each entrance to the complex and lighted during hours of darkness. ,160. in by to Address numbers shall be placed on all buildings, an obvious sequence pattern, to be reviewed and approved the Police Department community services officer prior installation. 61. Prior to issuance of building permits for either the residential or recreational components of the project, the Police Department shall review development plans for the incorporation of defensible space concepts to reduce demands on police services. To the degree feasible, public safety planning recommendations shall be incorporated into the project plans. The Applicant shall prepare of list of project features and design components that demonstrate responsiveness to defensible space design concepts. Review and approval by the Police Department of all defensible space design features incorporated into the project shall occur prior to initiation of the building plan check process. 6I —. MOORPARK UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT CONDITION: 4162. Prior to issuance of building permits for the residential units, all legally mandated school impact fees applicable at the time of issuance of a building permit shall be paid to the Moorpark Unified School District. HJ —. BUILDING DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS: 163. The final grading plan shall meet all standards of the Uniform Building Code (UBC). 3-:164. Spark Arrestor: An approved spark arrestor shall be installed on the chimney of any structure(s). .� 1` ii ♦i n;; 1 `es o rf � � re so DeT >e otiraent. R L,,. ?.....,,.2- nL..F.:...: _ut__.n, ..ncx bons`., .._,n ad..._`'.onci.;.t_onr; iz:;ta ._...._. ................................................................... _........................................ .......................... ._._................._....................................................................................._.................................................. ......._:::_:::................ v., _ . . .:. eq .( hoc. b..-...; E�i7{ RIRki. i?.: a..f:.•.;. .....�32.y.F•.. - Fi'">HRc ..._�_......(i.; -=k�. _- .ci._._�k2fi 7�ii} ���- tvFtg __.F:lrT3 ... _......_.................._ .... --- ._..._..... -- ....... ............. i3`?& dFaF�S: \Csafafai S {3i tLLl -L'E�> ia£t?{? :�g -:' �. t -'v�� E' r i s -_ {} {3Ek., {':' j{?S �' - L.Ek .�3�i .. {?..._ v a.tt x. iCc>[{u{cttrtz iu x . {# �h.: fat ..... _ ,hc c3_� #:sets C >r {� L a {des rxi Modified: 07/".',/028 0-2 C. v — -I'- 9 Resolution No. —:-2002 - GPA 08 -G ., Z�C 2002 9-1,-RPD No. 2001 -44-02 Page 52 TK. MITIGATION MEASURE CONDITIONS: 65. Prior to Issuance of Grading permit, the final Geotechnical recommendations for development of the project shall include measures to address the potential for liquefaction, which may include but not be limited to caissons, piers, and /or deep footings. 2166. Prior to the first Zoning Clearance for residential unit building permit, Developer shall pay a fair -share contribution for intersection improvements for Los Angeles Avenue /Moorpark Avenue, Los Angeles Avenue /Spring Road and Spring Road /High Street. The level of fair -share participation is based upon the traffic analysis prepared for the Archstone Apartment project at a sixty percent (600) value. 153 -16?. _Prior to Issuance of Grading Permit, site shall be raised to an elevation sufficient above the 100 -year event based upon a 26,600 elevation satisfactory to the City Engineer, provide protection from the 100 -year event. MITIGATION MONITORING REPORT PROGRAM the project to be at or cfs or to an which would MONITORING AND REPORTING REQUIREMENT FOR MITIGATION MEASURES: Prior to issuance of a Grading Permit, the City Engineer shall provide a memorandum to the Community Development Director verifying that the grading plans comply with all mitigation measures imposed as conditions of approval. Prior to issuance of Zonincr Clearance for residential unit building permit, the Communi -y Development Director shall verify that payiTent of the fair share contribution f_or.. intersection improvements for Los Angeles Avenue/Moorpark Avenue, Los Angeles Avenue /Spring Road and Sprinq Road /High Street has been made. Prior to issuance of a Building Permit, the Building Official shall provide a memorandum to the Community Development Director S:\Corlmunitv Deve o�nent`�,F, e L`1L ;;;L- ;L ,,Ee ,c, cations Conde t� ons'�._ eso cc rpd conditions usa ........................................._.._..._......__.._........_....._........................................_.._......._._......................................................_._.................................................................................... ............................_:: ......._..........._....._.........................._....................... ............................... ry ....Fl ........ S'�----- -- - - - ---- --------------- ......¢..... C':' St'<�'rgv'-�.�...._l::�J�'i'. .a .....> ....... ....._':i.....:;.. _ ,. • F :. A c Fs F. -r- . c5c Ea c .�_�\�? � \�;`f- <_*t- t�?:.�sj- trt:�- ergs-- fiei3c�_t�'_ n�.._�•.�5........._- iacz-- �?tz�t�- #:- �'t'3- u ,>usrt':.r3. {'..s�:�..._� �, �,...... i-- c�(> s' rei.LL..�...sz>r }y......u.,;.,,. Modified: G?:0 •a1 Resolution No. -� -2002- GPi� 2992 01.,Z-, 2GG2 Ol..,-RPD No. 2001-4-q-02 Page 53 verifying that the building plans comply with all mitigation measures imposed as conditions of approval. S.\ComrnuriJ.ty Deve-sopmerit"'IF, T.-I D\12."�02-;-,2',,,Fe�--.c)!.iit-�oiifF. Conditions \,reso rpd cond-:t',)n,,3 usa ....... . ........... J ....................... conditions . .... . ..... -, 111 I e,,&Yt4='t4- Deve" .'an . . ... .................... ..... . .... . .. .......... .. . ...... . .... . .......... . .............................. . . ....... ..... ......................... . ..... 2A - ---- - ,j..a Modified: 07,`0%028 NOTICE OF INTENT TO ADOPT A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN: The City of Moorpark, after having conducted an Initial Study, has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration for the following project: RPD No. 2002 -02, GPA No. 2002 -01 & ZC 2002 -01 • A request for a change in General Plan designation from General Commercial (C -2) to Very High Density (VH) a change of Zone designation from Commercial Planned Development (CPD) to Residential Planned Development (RP D) and a request for a RPD permit to allow the construction of 190 senior citizen apartment units on a 948 acre parcel The project is located at: Park Lane at Park Crest Lane (APN 506 -0- 050 -185 & a portion of 506-0-050-475. Moorpark Ventura County The project site is not contained on any of the lists enumerated under Section 65962.5 of the Government Code including, but not limited to lists of hazardous waste facilities, land designated as hazardous waste property, and hazardous waste disposal sites. The proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration and Initial Study are forwarded to you for possible comments relating to your area of interest. All documents referenced therein are available for review during normal business hours in the Community Development office, City Hall, 799 Moorpark Avenue, Moorpark, California, 93021. Information on public hearings or meetings for the proposed project can be obtained from the Community Development Department at (805) 517 -6200. Written comments should be directed to: Barry K. Hogan, Community Development Director Community Development Department City of Moorpark 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark, CA 93021 (805) 517 -6258 bhogan @ci.moorpark.ca.us Written comments will be accepted in the Community Development Department office for a period of twenty (20) days after publication of this notice. Public Notice Published: June 14, 2002 Mitigated Negative Declaration Comment Period: June 14. 2002 to July 8. 2002 BE rry K. g*Coity evel opment Director CC ATTACHMENT/ MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION CITY OF MOORPARK 799 MOORPARK AVENUE MOORPARK, CA 93021 (805) 517 -6200 The following Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 as amended, the State Guidelines, and the Environmental Procedures of the City of Moorpark. Public Review Period: June 14, 2002 to July 8, 2002 Project Title /Case No. Vintage Crest Senior Apartments Responsible Agencies: None Trustee Agencies: None Attachments: Location Map Initial Study with Mitigation Measures and Monitoring and Reporting Program Contact Person: Barry K. Hogan, Community Development Director Community Development Department City of Moorpark 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark, California, 93021 (805) 517 -6258 SACommunity Development\R P D\2002 -02 \Env Docs \Vintage.MND1.doc Page 1 RPD No. 2002 -02, GPA No. 2002 -01 and ZC No. 2002 -02 Project Location: Park Lane at Park Crest Lane, Moorpark, Ventura County. (Location Map Attached) Project Description: A request for a change in General Plan designation from General Commercial (C -2) to Very High Density (VH), a change of Zone designation from Commercial Planned Development (CPD) to Residential Planned Development (RPD) and a request for a RPD permit to allow the construction of 190 senior citizen apartment units on a 9.48 acre parcel. Project Type: X Private Project _ Public Project Project Applicant: USA Properties Fund, 2440 Professional Drive, Ste. 100, Roseville, CA 95661, (916) 773 -6060 Finding: After preparing an Initial Study for the above - referenced project, revisions have been made by or agreed to by the applicant consistent with the mitigation measures identified in the Initial Study. With these revisions, it is found that there is no substantial evidence, in light of the whole record before the City of Moorpark, that the project may have a significant effect on the environment. (Initial Study Attached) Responsible Agencies: None Trustee Agencies: None Attachments: Location Map Initial Study with Mitigation Measures and Monitoring and Reporting Program Contact Person: Barry K. Hogan, Community Development Director Community Development Department City of Moorpark 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark, California, 93021 (805) 517 -6258 SACommunity Development\R P D\2002 -02 \Env Docs \Vintage.MND1.doc Page 1 LOCATION MAP A NORTH CITY OF MOORPARK INITIAL STUDY 799 MOORPARK AVENUE MOORPARK, CA 93021 (805) 517 -6200 Project Title: Vintage Crest Senior Apartments Case No.: RPD No. 2002 -02, GPA No. 2002 -01 & ZC 2002 -01 Contact Person and Phone No.: Barry K. Hogan, Community Development Director Name of Applicant: USA Properties Fund Address and Phone No.: 2440 Professional Drive, Ste. 100, Roseville, CA 95661 - -(916) 773- 6060 Project Location: Park Lane at Park Crest Lane (APN 506-0- 050 -185 & a portion of 506- 0 -050- 475 General Plan Designation: General Commercial Zoning: Commercial Planned Development Project Description: A request for a change in General Plan designation from General Commercial (C -2) to Very High Density (VH), a change of Zone designation from Commercial Planned Development (CPD) to Residential Planned Development (RPD) and a request for a RPD permit to allow the construction of 190 senior citizen apartment units on a 9.48 acre parcel Surrounding Land Uses and Setting: North: Vacant and single family home on commercially zoned property South: Arroyo Simi Flood Channel East: Archstone Apartments (312 units) West: Single Family Dwellings (Villa Campesina) Responsible and Trustee Agencies: None ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED: The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Si nificant Impact" or 'Potentially Significant Unless Mitigated, "as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. Aesthetics Agricultural Resources Air Quality Biological Resources Cultural Resources X Geology /Soils X Hazards and Hazardous Materials X Hydrology/Water Quality Land Use /Planning Mineral Resources Noise Population/Housing Public Services Recreation X Transportationfrraffic Utilities/Service Systems Mandatory Findings of Significance None DETERMINATION: On the basis of this initial evaluation, I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the project have been made by or agreed to by the project proponent. Mitigation measures described on the attached Exhibit 1 have been added to the project. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. Prepared by: Jo a Parker- ozylinski, Case Planner Date: June 10, 2002 Reviewed by: a ry K. n, C�7nity Development Director Date: 2 'age 2 (Vintage Crest Senior Apartment) (RPD No. 2002 -02, GPA No.2002 -01, ZC No. 2002 -02) INITIAL STUDY EXHIBIT 1: MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION MITIGATION MEASURES AND MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM Liquefaction potential was evaluated at the site and the site was found to have potential for liquefaction. Monitoring Action: The final Geotechnical recommendations for development of the project shall include measures to address the potential for liquefaction, which may include but not be limited to caissons, piers, and /or deep footings. Timing: Prior to Issuance of Grading permit Responsibility: City Engineer 2. The existing Ventura County Flood Control District ( VCFCD) Arroyo Simi is an improved trapezoidal channel that traverses the City of Moorpark. The channel consists of a dirt bottom, rip -rap side slopes, and concrete drop structures at various locations to stabilize the bottom of the channel from erosion. The VCFCD has published an approved hydrologic study report that reports a peak flow in the Arroyo Simi for a 100 -year event of 26,600 cfs (cubic feet per second). Additionally, more detailed analysis indicates that the peak 100 year event flow is 22,300 cfs. Since this new hydrologic report has not been approved, a study was performed for both cfs flows. Monitoring Action: The project site shall be raised to an elevation sufficient to be at or above the 100 -year event based upon a 26,600 cfs or to an elevation satisfactory to the City Engineer, which would provide protection from the 100 -year event. Timing: Prior to Issuance of Grading Permit Responsibility. City Engineer 3. Future Year 2010 with cumulative traffic reflecting buildout of all foreseeable development projects indicated that four of the six study intersections will operate at LOS D or E during the AM and /or PM peak hours. Monitoring Action: The project will be required to pay a pro -rata percentage (fair share) of the planned cumulative mitigation measures identified in the Traffic Impact Study. Timing: Prior to Issuance of Grading Permit Responsibility. City Engineer (Vintage Crest Senior Apartment) (RPD No. 2002 -02, GPA No.2002 -01, ZC No. 2002 -02) 4. According to the State of California Department of Health Services (DHS) state -wide radon survey conducted in 1991, radon concentrations in residences located within the geographical region of the site average above 4 pico Curies per liter of air. Therefore, elevated concentrations of radon in indoor air may adversely impact the site upon completion of the development Monitoring Action: Construction shall incorporate radon - resistant design approved by a State Certified radon mitigation specialist. After construction, indoor air radon levels shall be tested and reduced to below 4 pico - Curries per liter if exceeding this threshold. Timing: Prior to Issuance of Building Permit Responsibility: Director of Community Development and Building Official AGREEMENT TO PROPOSED MITIGATION MEASURES AND MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM In accordance with the CEQA Guidelines Section 15070 (California Code of Regulations Title 14, Chapter 3, Article 6), this agreement must be signed prior to release of the Mitigated Negative Declaration for public review. I, THE UNDERSIGNED PROJECT APPLICANT, HEREBY AGREE TO MODIFY THE PROJECT DESIGN, CONSTRUCTION OR OPERATION AS NECESSARY TO INCLUDE ALL OF THE ABOVE - LISTED MITIGATION MEASURES IN THE PROJECT. Signature of Project Applicant Date igA (Vintage Crest Senior Apartment) (RPD No. 2002 -02, GPA No.2002 -01, ZC No. 2002 -02) 4) Create a new source of substantial light or glare which X would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? Response: The proposed project is an infill site surrounded on three sides by residential uses and on the south by the Arroyo Simi. The terrain of the site is relatively flat. The eastern half of the site is currently vacant and western half of the site contains a commercial greenhouse that has been in use for approximately 20 years. The project site does not affect any significant ridgelines defined by Ordinance No. 207. Sources: Project application on file with the City. Ordinance No. 207 and exhibits Mitigation: None R ArRICULTURF RESOURCES — In determinina whether imDacts to agricultural resources are significant environmental effects, the City of Moorpark may refer to the California Agricultural Land Evaluation and Site Assessment Model (1997) prepared by the California Dept. of Conservation as an optional model to use in assessing impacts on agriculture and farmland. Would the project: 1) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland x of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources agency, to non - agricultural use? 2) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a X Williamson Act contract? 3) Involve other changes in the existing environment which, x due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non - agricultural use? Response: The terrain of the site is relatively flat. The eastern half of the site is currently vacant and western half of the site contains a commercial greenhouse that has been in use for approximately 20 years. No agricultural or farming uses exist on the site. Sources: Project application on file with the City. Mitigation: None S:\Community Development\R P D\2002 -02\Env Docs \Vintage.IS1.doc Page 3� Less Than Potentially Significant Less Than Significant With Significant No Impact Mitigation Impact Impact A. AESTHETICS — Would the project: 1) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? X 2) Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but x not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state scenic highway? 3) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or X quality of the site and its surroundings? 4) Create a new source of substantial light or glare which X would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? Response: The proposed project is an infill site surrounded on three sides by residential uses and on the south by the Arroyo Simi. The terrain of the site is relatively flat. The eastern half of the site is currently vacant and western half of the site contains a commercial greenhouse that has been in use for approximately 20 years. The project site does not affect any significant ridgelines defined by Ordinance No. 207. Sources: Project application on file with the City. Ordinance No. 207 and exhibits Mitigation: None R ArRICULTURF RESOURCES — In determinina whether imDacts to agricultural resources are significant environmental effects, the City of Moorpark may refer to the California Agricultural Land Evaluation and Site Assessment Model (1997) prepared by the California Dept. of Conservation as an optional model to use in assessing impacts on agriculture and farmland. Would the project: 1) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland x of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources agency, to non - agricultural use? 2) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a X Williamson Act contract? 3) Involve other changes in the existing environment which, x due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non - agricultural use? Response: The terrain of the site is relatively flat. The eastern half of the site is currently vacant and western half of the site contains a commercial greenhouse that has been in use for approximately 20 years. No agricultural or farming uses exist on the site. Sources: Project application on file with the City. Mitigation: None S:\Community Development\R P D\2002 -02\Env Docs \Vintage.IS1.doc Page 3� (Vintage Crest Senior Apartment) (RPD No. 2002 -02, GPA No.2002 -01, ZC No. 2002 -02) C. AIR QUALITY — Where available, the significance criteria established by the applicable air quality management or air pollution control district may be relied upon to make the following determinations. Would the project: 1) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable X air quality plan? 2) Violate any air quality standard or contribute x substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation? 3) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any X criteria pollutant for which the project region is non attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors)? 4) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant X concentrations? 5) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number X of people? The preliminary URBEMIS 7G run for the project yielded total unmitigated emission estimates of 21.58 pounds per day for Reactive Organic Gases (ROG) and 18.78 pounds per day of Nitrous Oxides (NOx). The total emission estimates for ROG and NOx are less than the 25 pounds per day air quality significance threshold, as defined by the Ventura County Air Quality Assessment Guidelines. Sources: Ventura County Air Pollution Control District Letter dated January 30, 2002 Mitigation: None D_ BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES — Would the oroiect: 1) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? 2) Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or US Fish and Wildlife Service? 3) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? 4) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? 5) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? X X X X X , SACommunity Development\R P D\2002- 02\Env Docs \Vintage.IS1.doc Page 4 (Vintage Crest Senior Apartment) (RPD No. 2002 -02, GPA No.2002 -01, ZC No. 2002 -02) 6) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat x Response: The terrain of the site is relatively flat. The eastern half of the site is currently vacant and western half of the site contains a commercial greenhouse that has been in use for approximately 20 years. Annual grasses and weeds grow on the eastern half of the site. One California Pepper tree was located approximately in the center of the property adjacent to an existing wire fence that separates the nursery operation from the eastern undeveloped portion of the lot. The multi - trunk California Pepper is a large specimen exhibiting good health and form. Grading activities will require removal of the tree. The City of Moorpark Municipal Code requires that upgraded tree plantings equal to the value of the removed tree be installed. Residential uses surround the property on three sides with the Arroyo Simi Sources: Pacific Horticulture Tree Evaluation dated November 16, 2001, Moorpark Municipal Code Mitigation: None E. CULTURAL RESOURCES — Would the project: 1) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of x a historic resource as defined in §15064.5? 2) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of x an archaeological resource pursuant to §15064.5? 3) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological x resource or site or unique geologic feature? 4) Disturb any human remains, including those interred x outside of formal cemeteries? Response: The terrain of the site is relatively flat. The eastern half of the site is currently vacant and western half of the site contains a commercial greenhouse that has been in use for approximately 20 years. The possibility of archaeological resources being contained on the site is minimal given that the site has been previously used for agriculture. Sources: Project application on file with the City. Mitigation: None F. GEOLOGY AND SOILS — Would the project: 1) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death Involving: 1) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist -Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42. ii) Strong seismic ground shaking? iii) Seismic - related ground failure, including liquefaction? iv) Landslides? 2) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? S:\Community Development\R P D\2002- 02\Env Docs \Vintage.IS1 -doc x x .agg 5"', , c-a x x x x .agg 5"', , c-a (Vintage Crest Senior Apartment) (RPD No. 2002 -02, GPA No.2002 -01, ZC No. 2002 -02) 3) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on- or off -site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? 4) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18 -1 -B X of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial risks to life or property? 5) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative waste water disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of waste water? Response: The site and soil conditions, with the exception of the loose surface soils, appear to be conducive to the development of the project according to the Geotechnical Report prepared for the project. The surface soils have a loose consistency and will be recompacted. The project must meet minimum requirements of the California Administrative Code, 1997 Edition, as amended by the Moorpark Municipal Code prior to issuance of a building permit. Liquefaction potential was evaluated at the site and the site was found to have potential for liquefaction. Sources: Geotechnical Engineering Investigation, Prepared by Krazan & Associates dated April 4, 2001. Moorpark Municipal Code. Mitigation: The final Geotechnical recommendations for development of the project shall include measures to address the potential for liquefaction, which may include but not be limited to caissons, piers, and /or deep footings. G. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS — Would the project: 1) Create a significant hazard to the public or the X environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials? 2) Create a significant hazard to the public or the X environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? 3) Emit hazardous emission or handle hazardous or acutely X hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one - quarter mile of an existing or proposed school? 4) Be located on a site which is included on a list of X hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? 5) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, X where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? 6) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would X the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? 7) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an X adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? SACommunity Development \R P D\2002- 02\Env Docs \Vntage.IS1.doc Page 6 (Vintage Crest Senior Apartment) (RPD No. 2002 -02, GPA No.2002 -01, ZC No. 2002 -02) 8) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where The eastern half of the site is currently vacant and western half of the site contains a commercial greenhouse that has been in use for approximately 20 years. Pesticides generally associated with commercial greenhouse operations may have historically been applied to plants on site. The County of Ventura Agricultural Commission records indicate no registered pesticide usage at the site during the year of 1999, 2000, 2001. A cesspool is located in the southeast quadrant of the subject site. Water discharged from the greenhouse drains to the cesspool. Therefore, elevated concentrations of environmentally persistent pesticide may be found in the near surface soils of the site in the area of the cesspool. According to the State of California Department of Health Services (DHS) state -wide radon survey conducted in 1991, radon concentrations in residences located within the geographical region of the site average above 4 pico Curies per liter of air. Therefore, elevated concentrations of radon in indoor air may adversely impact the site upon completion of the development Sources: Phase I Environmental Site Assessment, Krazan and Associates, Inc. April 11, 2001 Mitigation: Construction shall incorporate radon - resistant design approved by a State Certified radon mitigation specialist. After construction, indoor air radon levels shall be tested and reduced to below 4 pico- Curries per liter if exceeding this threshold. H_ HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY — Would the Droiect: 1) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge x requirements? 2) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere x substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e.g., the production rate of pre- existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted)? 3) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site x or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off -site? 4) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site x or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on- or off -site? 5) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the x capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff? 6) Otherwise substantially degrade water quality? x 7) Place housing within a 100 -year flood hazard area as x mapped on a federal Flood Hazard boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map? 8) Place within a 100 -year flood hazard area structures x which would impede or redirect flood flows? SACommunity DevelopmenAR P D\2002- 02\Env DocsUntage.ISl.doc Page 7 (Vintage Crest Senior Apartment) (RPD No. 2002 -02, GPA No.2002 -01, ZC No. 2002 -02) 9) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, X injury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam? 10) Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow? Response: The existing Ventura County Flood Control District ( VCFCD) Arroyo Simi is an improved trapezoidal channel that traverses the City of Moorpark. The channel consists of a dirt bottom, rip -rap side slopes, and concrete drop structures at various locations to stabilize the bottom of the channel from erosion. The VCFCD has published an approved hydrologic study report that reports a peak flow in the Arroyo Simi for a 100 -year event of 26,600 cfs (cubic feet per second). Additionally, more detailed analysis indicates that the peak 100 year event flow is 22,300 cfs. Since this new hydrologic report has not been approved, a study was performed for both cfs flows. The proposed onsite drainage system includes a detention basin. The basin is intended to detain the incremental increase in runoff. The project will also comply with NPDES permit requirements and the treatment of non -storm and "first flush" storm runoff through the use of four onsite bio- filtration areas. The project site would be raised to a point at or above the 100 - year event. Estimates are approximately 2 -feet. Sources: Prelimina[y Hydrology /Hydraulic Report, Hall & Foreman, Inc., April 30, 2002 and Floodplain Analysis Report of the Arroyo Simi, Hall & Foreman, Inc., May 14, 2002 Mitigation: The project site shall be raised to an elevation sufficient to be at or above the 100 -year event based upon a 26,600 cfs or to an elevation satisfactory to the City Engineer which would provide protection from the 100 -year event. I. LAND USE AND PLANNING — Would the project: 1) Physically divide an established community? X 2) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or X regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to the general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? 3) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or X natural community conservation plan? Response: The proposed project would be inconsistent with the current General Plan and Zoning designations on the property. However, the application includes a request to change the General Plan designation from General Commercial to Very High Density Residential and the Zone Map designation from Commercial Planned Development to Residential Planned Development. A condition of the RPD would require approval of the general plan amendment and zone change for the RPD approval to be effective. Sources: City of Moorpark General Plan Map and Zoning Map Mitigation: None. FM Tfr,ra ."711 — Would the oroiect: 1) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the state? 2) Result in the loss of availability of a locally- important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan? S: \Community Development\R P D\2002 -02 \Env Docs \Vintage.IS1 -doc X X Pape C.... -- . (Vintage Crest Senior Apartment) (RPD No. 2002 -02, GPA No.2002 -01, ZC No. 2002 -02) Response: No known mineral resources have been identified in the Moorpark City limits. Sources: City of Moorpark Open Space Conservation, and Recreation Element, 1986. Mitigation: None. K. NOISE — Would the project result in: 1) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? 2) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive groundbome vibration or groundbome noise levels? 3) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? 4) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? 5) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? 6) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? X X X X X X Response: The primary noise generator in the vicinity is traffic on Los Angeles Avenue. The project is more than sufficient distance from Los Angeles Avenue that standard construction techniques would sufficiently attenuate traffic noise. Temporary impacts due to construction noise will occur while the project is constructed, however, construction will be limited to work Monday through Saturday from 7 a.m. to 7 p.m. Sources: Cily of Moorpark Noise Element 1998• Moorpark Municipal Code Chapter 15.26. Mitigation: None. L_ POPULATION AND HOUSING — Would the Droiect: 1) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? 2) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? 3) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? SXommunity DevelopmentU2 P D\2002- 021Env Docs\ intage.ISI.doc X X X Page 9 (Vintage Crest Senior Apartment) (RPD No. 2002 -02, GPA No.2002 -01, ZC No. 2002 -02) Response: The project is for 190 senior restricted rental dwelling units. If we assume a conservative reasonably - foreseeable occupancy rate of 2.0 persons per unit, a total of 380 persons would be projected at full occupancy. Since the site is currently zoned for commercial, no population numbers were allocated to this site. The projection of 380 persons, while an increase over the current population projections of the Moorpark General Plan, it is not considered to a significant increase. Sources: City of Moorpark Housing Element, 2001. Mitigation: None. M. PUBLIC SERVICES 1) Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services: Fire protection? x Police protection? x Schools? x Parks? x Other public facilities? x Response: The senior residents would not impact schools. Other services are already provided to the site and are not expected to be impacted. Sources: City of Moorpark Safety Element, 2001 Mitigation: None. N. RECREATION 1) Would the project increase the use of existing x neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? 2) Does the project include recreational facilities or require x the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which might have an adverse physical effect on the Response: On site recreation facilities including a swimming pool will be provided for the residents of the apartment. Community gardens are also planned for the project. Since this project is a senior - restricted project and will have on -site recreation and recreation programs, it is not likely that it will have a significant impact upon neighborhood or regional parks, nor upon recreation facilities. Sources: Site plan and Landscape plans dated April 25, 2002 Mitigation: None SACommunity Development\R P D\2002 -02 \Env Docs \Vintage.ISI.doc F„ Page 10 (Vintage Crest Senior Apartment) (RPD No. 2002 -02, GPA No.2002 -01, ZC No. 2002 -02) O. TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC — Would the project: 1) Cause an increase in traffic which is substantial in relation to the existing traffic load and capacity of the street system (i.e., result in a substantial increase in either the number of vehicle trips, the volume to capacity ratio on roads, or congestion at intersections)? 2) Exceed, either individually or cumulatively, a level of service standard established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways? 3) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety risks? 4) substantially increase hazards due to a design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? 5) Result in inadequate emergency access? 6) Result in inadequate parking capacity? 7) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs supporting alternative transportation (e.g., bus turnouts, bicycle racks)? X X X X X X X Response: The proposed project is expected to generate 13 vehicle trips (8 inbound and 5 outbound) during the AM peak hour. During the PM peak hour, the proposed project is expected to generate 19 vehicle trips (11 inbound and 8 outbound). Over a 24 -hour period, the proposed project is forecast to generate 662 daily trips during a typical weekday. Six intersections were analyzed to determine changes to the volume /capacity ratio. No significant impacts at the intersections were found due to project traffic. Future Year 2010 with cumulative traffic reflecting buildout of all foreseeable development projects indicated that four of the six study intersections will operate at LOS D or E during the AM and /or PM peak hours. The project will be required to pay a pro -rata percentage (fair share) of the planned cumulative mitigation measures identified in the Traffic Impact Study. A Parking Study that analyzed five other USA Properties Fund's senior project found that the average parting rate was .66 occupied spaces per occupied dwelling unit with a maximum parking rate of .68 occupied spaces per dwelling unit. The proposed project provides 1 parking space for every dwelling unit. Sources: Traffic Impact Study Linscott, Law & Greenspan, April 2, 2002 Traffic and Parking Study Summary, Fehr & Peers Associates, Inc. February 14, 2002 City of Moorpark Circulation Element, 1992. Mitigation: The project will be required to pay a pro -rata percentage (fair share) of the planned cumulative mitigation measures identified in the Traffic Impact Study. P. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS — Would the project: 1) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board? 2) Require or result in the construction of new water or wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? SACommunity Development\R P D\2002- 02\Env Docs \Vntage.IS1.doc X X `. Page 11 (Vintage Crest Senior Apartment) (RPD No. 2002 -02, GPA No.2002 -01, ZC No. 2002 -02) 3) Require or result in the construction of new storm water drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? 4) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed? 5) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments? 6) Be served by the landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to accommodate the project's solid waste disposal needs? 7) Comply with federal, state, and local statutes and regulations related to solid waste? X X X X X Response: The Ventura County Waterworks Districts have an existing 10 water main northwest of the property within Park Lane, and an existing 8" sewer main within a 40' wide easement south of the project, on the north side of Arroyo Simi. The District has indicated that the project is within existing capacities. Electric, gas and cable television connection points are available east of the site in Park Crest Lane. Sources: Ventura County Waterworks Districts letters dated January 14, 2002. Mitigation: None 0_ MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE 1) Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality X of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self - sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history of prehistory? 2) Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, X but cumulatively considerable? ( "Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and effects of probable future projects)? 3) Does the project have environmental effects which will x cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? Response: This project has been reviewed with respect to the various CEOA issue areas identified herein and found to have less than significant impacts in most instances and less than significant impacts when mitigation measures are imposed, specifically in the areas of traffic, hydrology and soils. Potential cumulative impacts have been examined and this initial study has not found significant impacts. The project has been designed in such a manner so as not to have indirect or direct environmental effects or cause significant adverse effects upon human beings. Sources: Moorpark General Plan Moorpark Municipal Code. project plans. `iN ✓ ,d M. L`el S: \Community Development\R P D\2002 -02 \Env Docs \Vintage.IS1.doc Page 12 (Vintage Crest Senior Apartment) (RPD No. 2002 -02, GPA No.2002 -01, ZC No. 2002 -02) Earlier Environmental Documents Used in the Preparation of this Initial Study None Additional Project References Used to Prepare This Initial Study One or more of the following references were incorporated into the Initial Study by reference, and are available for review in the Community Development Office, City Hall, 799 Moorpark Avenue, Moorpark, CA 93021. Items used are referred to by number in the Response Section of the Initial Study Checklist. Environmental Information Form application and materials submitted on January 8, 2002. 2. Comments received from (departments) in response to the Community Development Department's request for comments. 3. The City of Moorpark's General Plan, as amended. 4. The Moorpark Municipal Code, as amended. 5. The City of Moorpark Procedures for the Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the State CEQA Guidelines adopted by Resolution No. 92 -872 6. Public Resources Code Section 21000 et. seq. and California Code of Regulations, Title 14 Section 15000 et. seq. 7. Ventura County Air Quality Assessment Guidelines, November 14, 2000. C. ....� -3. r....� r1. SACommunity DevelopmenAR P D\2002- 02\Env Docs\Untage.IStdoc Page 13 JUL -08 -2002 12:58 RMA PLANNING 885 654 2509 P.01i12 RESOURCE MANAGEMENT AGENCY ; verJ -For' planning Division /t 0 / 200 Christopher Stephens rat veridura �G S�.�G' M�fi� Director July 8, 2002 B. K Hogen Moorpark, CA FAX #: 529 -8270 7111, -.:7 � 7 A L' J ttttttt� /rI� /7 MW Subject: 190 Senior Citizen Apartments/MND Thank you for the opportunity to review and comment on the subject document. Attached are the comments that we have received resulting from intra - county review of the subject document. Your proposed responses to these comments should be sent directly to the commentator, with a copy to Joseph Eisenhut, Ventura County Planning Division, L #1740, 800 S_ Victoria Avenue, Ventura, CA 93009. If you have any questions regarding any of the comments, please contact the appropriate respondent. Overall questions may be directed to Joseph Eisenhut at (805) 654 -2464. Sincerely, County Planning Director F:1 RMAIWPCIWINWOR011 F34 -7 -02. doc Attachment County RMA Reference Number 02-049 800 South victoria Avenue, L# 1750, Ventura, CA 93009 (805) 654 -2481 Fax (805) 654 -2509 Printed on Recycled PADer JUL -08 -2002 12:58 RMA PLANNING 805 654 2509 P.02i12 VENTURA COUNTY AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT Memorandum TO: Joseph Eisenhut, Planning DATE: June 27, 2002 FROM: Andy Brown 0 SUBJECT: Request for review of Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) and Initial Study (IS) for the Vintage Crest Senior Apartments project, City of Moorpark (Reference No. 02 -049), (GPA2002 -02, ZC2002 -01, RPD2002 -02) Project Description Air Pollution Control District staff has reviewed the subject project MND/IS, which is a request for a Residential Planned Development (RPD) permit to allow the construction of a 190 -unit senior citizen apartment complex on a 9.48 acre parcel. In addition, a request a change in General Plan designation from General Commercial (C -2) to Very High Density (VH), and a change of Zone designation from Commercial Planned Development (CPD) to Residential Planned Development (RPD) are requested. District staff originally reviewed the IS for this project in January 2002. At that time the project was referred to as "Moorpark Senior Apartments." The project at that time was described as a two- story, 208 -unit senior citizen rental housing project on 9.48 acres. The proposal was for 15 senior citizen apartment buildings and one recreation building, with the apartments to include one and two bedroom flats, ranging between 579 and 800 square feet. Project Location The project location is south of Los Angeles Avenue, south of the Park Lane/Park Crest Lane intersection, between Moorpark Avenue and Juarez Avenue, in the City of Moorpark. Air Quality Impacts In response to the aforementioned IS for this project, District staff generated a preliminary URBEMIS 7G run for the project using the infonnation available in the IS at that time. This preliminary run yielded total unmitigated emission estimates of 21.58 lbs /day for Reactive Organic Gases (ROG) and 18.78 lbs /day of Nitrous Oxides (NOx), as reported in the original District memo dated January 30, 2002. JUL -08 -2002 12:58 RMA PLANNING 805 654 2509 P.03i12 Vintage Crest Senior Apartments/02-049 June 27, 2002 Page 2 The current subject project MND/IS has decreased the number of senior citizen apartment units from 208 to 190. In addition, on page 11 of the MND/IS, Section O — Transportation/Traffic, results of a project specific traffic study have been included. The Traffic Impact Study, dated April 2, 2002, forecasted 662 average daily trips (ADT) generated by this project, on a typical weekday. Using this updated, project specific data, revised emission estimates were computed for the project. The District used the latest version of the URBEMIS computer model, "URBEMIS 2001 For Windows" (Version 6.2.1). In addition, a project specific trip rate was calculated and inputted into the model, rather than using the default trip rate for the "Retirement Community" land use. This trip rate was calculated by dividing the forecasted 662 ADT by the number of dwelling units (190). The trip rate derived from this calculation was 3.48 trips/dwelling units. The URBEMIS 2001 run generated emission estimates (area + operational) of 22.21 lbs/day for ROG and 17.58 lbs/day for NOx for the revised project (Attachment 1). Although the estimated ROG emissions are slightly higher, they are still below the 25- lbs /day -air quality significance threshold for both ROG and NOx, as defined by the Ventura County Air Quality Assessment Guidelines (2000). The District selected "Retirement Community" as the land use description most appropriate for this project. In addition, the year 2003 was selected for "Target Year" as this is the scheduled completion year for the project based on the IS. Conditions Although the project is not expected to result in any significant local air quality impacts, the District recommends the following conditions be placed on the permit. These conditions would help to minimize fugitive dust and particulate matter that may result from grading and construction activities, as well as reduce the amount of ozone precursors released: 1) All clearing, filling, grading, earth moving, or excavation activities shall cease during periods of high winds to prevent excessive amounts of fugitive dust. 2) All trucks that will haul excavated or graded material off site shall comply with State Vehicle Code Section 23114, with special attention to Sections 23114(b)(F), (e)(2) and (e)(4) as amended, regarding the prevention of such material spilling onto public streets and roads. 3) All unpaved on -site roads shall be periodically watered or treated with environmentally -safe dust suppressants to prevent excessive amounts of dust. JUL -08 -2002 12:59 RMA PLANNING 805 654 2509 P.04i12 Vintage Crest Senior ApunenW02 -049 June 27, 2002 Page 2 4) The area disturbed by clearing, grading earth moving, or excavation operations shall be minimized to prevent excessive amounts of fugitive dust. 5) All active portions of the site shall be either periodically watered or treated with environmentally -safe dust suppressants to prevent excessive amounts of dust. 6) On -site vehicle speeds shall not exceed 15 miles per hour. 7) Construction equipment engines shall be maintained in good condition and in proper time as per manufacturers' specifications. 8) Facilities shall be operated in accordance with the Rules and Regulations of the Ventura County Air Pollution Control District, with emphasis on Rule 51, Nuisance. "A person shall not discharge from any source whatsoever such quantities of air contaminants or other material which cause injury, detriment, nuisance or annoyance to any considerable number of persons or to the public or which endangers the comfort, repose, health or safety of any such persons or the public or which cause or have a natural tendency to cause injury or damage to business or property." If you have any questions, contact me by telephone at (805) 645 -1439 or by email at andy6bvcapcd.org. JUL -08 -2002 12:59 RMA PLANNING 805 654 2509 P.06i12 URBEMIS 2001 For Windows 6.2.1 File Name: C: \Program Filea \URBEMIS 2001 For Windows \Projects2k \02 -049 Vintag Project Name: 02 -049 Vintage Crest Senior Apartments Project Location: Ventura County SUMMARY REPORT (Pounds /Day - Summer) AREA SOURCE EMISSION ESTIMATES ROG NOx CO PM10 S02 TOTALS(lbs /day,unmitigated) 9.51 1.44 1.30 0.00 0.00 OPERATIONAL (VEHICLE) EMISSION ESTIMATES ROG Nox CO PM10 S02 TOTALS (ppd, unmitigated) 12.70 16.14 139.59 0.64 0.09 aa.aI i7.6$ JUL -08 -2002 12:59 RMA PLANNING 805 654 2509 P.07i12 URAEMIS 2001 For Windows 6.2.1 File Name: C: \Program Files \V"EMIS 2001 For Windows \Projects2k \02 -049 Vintag Project Name: 02 -049 Vintage Crest Senior Apartments Project Location: Ventura County DETAIL REPORT (Pounds /Day - Summer) AREA SOURCE EMISSION ESTIMATES (Summer Pounds per Day, Unmitigated) Source ROG NOx CO PM10 S02 Natural Gas 0.11 1.43 0.61 0.00 - Wood Stoves - No summer emissions Fireplaces - No summer emissions Landscaping 0.10 0.01 0.69 0.00 0.00 Consumer Prdcts 9.30 - - - - TOTALS(lbs /day,unmitigated) 9.51 1.44 1.30 0.00 0.00 JUL -08 -2002 12:59 RMA PLANNING 805 654 2509 P.08/12 UNMITIGATED OPERATIONAL EMISSIONS ROO NOx CO PM10 S02 Retirement community 12.70 16.14 139.59 0.64 0.09 TOTAL EMISSIONS (lbs /day) 12.70 16.14 139.59 0.64 0.09 Does not include correction for passby trips. Does not include double counting adjustment for internal trips. OPERATIONAL (Vehicle) EMISSION ESTIMATES Analysis Year: 2003 Temperature (F): 75 Season: Summer EMFAC Version: EMPAC2001 (10/2001) Summary of Land Uses: Unit Type Trip Rate Size Total Trips Retirement community 3.48 trips / dwelling units 190.00 661.20 Vehicle Assumptions: Fleet Mix: Vehicle Type Percent Type Non - Catalyst Catalyst Diesel Light Auto 61.40 4.70 94.50 0.80 Light Truck c 3,750 lbs 9.30 11.00 88.90 0.10 Light Truck 3,751- 5,750 16.70 1.80 97.60 0.60 Med Truck 5,751- 8,500 7.20 12.50 79.20 8.30 Lite -Heavy 6,501- 10,000 1.10 18.20 72.70 9.10 Lite -Heavy 10,001- 14,000 0.30 0.00 66.70 33.30 Med -Heavy 14,001 - 33,000 1.10 9.10 27.30 63.60 Heavy -Heavy 33,001- 60,000 0.70 0.00 0.00 100.00 Line Haul > 60,000 lbs 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00 Urban Bus 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00 Motorcycle 1.40 90.90 9.10 0.00 School Bus 0.10 0.00 0.00 100.00 Motor Home 0.70 0.00 100.00 0.00 Travel Conditions Residential Commercial Home- Home- Home - Work Shop Other Commute Non -Work Customer Urban Trip Length (miles) 12.0 7.8 10.0 10.0 4.7 4.7 Rural Trip Length (miles) 15.0 10.0 1010 15.0 15.0 1S.0 Trip Speeds (mph) 40.0 40.0 40.0 40.0 40.0 40.0 * of Trips - Residential 27.4 17.7 54.9 JUL -08 -2002 12:59 RNA PLANNING 805 654 2509 P.09/12 Changes made to the default values for Area Changes made to the default values for operations The operational emission year changed from 2002 to 2003. The travel mode environment settings changed from both to: none JUL -08 -2002 12:59 RMA PLANNING e05 654 2509 P.10i12 Melinda Talent - RPQ 2� 00? -02, GPA 2002 01, ZC 2D02 -01 _ _ Page 1 From: Melinda Talent To: bhogan @ci.moorpark.ca.us Date: 7/1/02 2.571PM Subject: RPD 2002 -02, GPA 2002 -01, ZC 2002 -01 The Environmental Health Division reviewed the subject project and noted that in the Hazardous and Hazardous Material section of the initial study there was mention of a cesspool. EHD recommends that the existing cesspool be abandoned. If you have any questions, please contact me at 654 -2811. JUL -08 -2002 12:59 V , TO: IJ "IQ uA RMA PLANNING PUBLIC WORKS AGENCY TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT Traffic and Planning & Administration MEM;?RANDUM June 27, 2002 Resource Management Agency, Planning Division Attention: Joseph Eisenhut Nazir Lalani, Principal Engineer /y- 805 654 2509 JIM 4 8z0 SUBJECT: Review of Document 02 -049 Initial Study &-Notice of Intent to Adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration Vintage Crest Senior Apartment Lead Agency: The City of MOORPARK The Transportation Department has completed the review to adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration. The proposed the general plan designation from general commercial to from commercial planned development to residential I construction of 190 senior citizen apartment units on a 9.2 the intersection of Park Lane and Park Crest Lane in the Ci observations: P. 11/12 'the Initial Study and Notice of Intent oject entails a request for a change in ry high density and a zoning change need development to allow for the acre parcel. The project is located at of Moorpark. We offer the following 1. The Initial Study indicated that this project would generite additional traffic. No specific project impacts on County roadways were identified in the Initial Study. 2. California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requires the evaluation of cumulative impacts when they are significant [PRC 15130 (a)]. The cumulative impact which results from the incremental impact of traffic generated by this project, when added to other closely related past, present, and reasonably foreseeable probable future projects may be individually minor, but collectively significant over a period of time. 3. The County of Ventura did prepare a "Traffic Impact Mitigation Fee Program Engineering Report" dated October 2001. The purpose of the Engineering Report is to provide documentation for revision to County Ordinance Code section 8601 -0, et seq. in accordance with Government Code section 66000 et seq. (AB 1600). It is also intended to provide technical support for reciprocal traffic impact agreements between each city in Ventura County and the County of Ventura. It is further intended to advise each city, municipal agency, business or trade organization and the public in general, of the process used to develop the County Traffic Impact Mitigation Fee Ordinance. 4. The Engineering Report finds and identifies certain roads in the County Regional Road Network, as defined by the County General Plan, that will degrade to an unacceptable Level of Service (LOS) due to cumulative traffic generated by past, present, and reasonably foreseeable probable JUL -08 -2002 13:00 RMA PLANNING 805 654 2509 P.12i12 future projects approved by the City of Moorpark and others. This is a substantial traffic increase in relation to the existing street and traffic load and capacity of the Regional Road Network and a potentially significant adverse project impact if not mitigated to a Less Than Significant level. 5. CEQA provides for mitigation of significant project impacts by compensation of the impact to replace or provide substitute resources. The County Traffic Impact Fee Ordinance (County Ordinance Code section 8601 -0 et seq.) does provide a method to provide substitute resources by payment of a traffic impact fee designed to provide a method of funding improvements to the Regional Road Network caused by the cumulative impact of this project and reasonably foreseeable probable future projects approved by the City of Moorpark and other cities. 6. The Board of Supervisors by adoption of Ordinance 4246, repealed existing Chapter 6 (commencing with section 8601 -0) of the Ventura County Ordinance Code and accompanying resolution on November 6, 2001. Ordinance 4246 became effective on January 8, 2002. 7. Based on the fee schedule established in accordance with County Ordinance Code 8601 -0 et seq. for the area identified in the Ordinance as the Moorpark Traffic Impact Fee District and the information on page 11 of the initial study, the estimated fee amount will be: 662 ADT X $ 12.95 /ADT ° S,,572.9 However, the City may propose to mitigate the cumulative project impacts on the County Regional Road Network to a Less Than Significant level, by the methodology described herein, or any other alternate methodology that results in mitigation of the cumulative traffic impacts of this project on the County Regional Road Network to a Less Than Significant level providing such alternate methodology is satisfactory to the County. 9. If desired the City may place the TIME in a Trust Fund assigned to the County until such time as the reciprocal traffic impact mitigation funding agreement has been approved by both agencies or a maximum of five years. If the County has successfully negotiated a reciprocal agreement with the City before the approval of this project, this project will be subject to the terms of this agreement. If the project cumulative impacts are not mitigated by payment of a traffic mitigation fee, current General Plan policy will require County opposition to this project. 10. Our review is limited to the impacts this project may have on the County's Regional Road Network. Please call me at 654 -2080 if you have questions. C: Ray Gutierrez, Jr. N :1Non_County102- 049- WK,doc.kts TOTAL P.12 county of venture RECEIVED jUL - 9 2002 PUBLIC WORKS AGENCY RONALD C. COONS Director City of Moorpara �8iti^iflitiYtlt,� Q��tf'!!?t�fF�t�;:t °,, July 2, 2002 City of Moorpark Mr. Barry Hogan, Community Development Director Community Development Department 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark, California 93021 SUBJECT: RMA 02 -049, USA Properties, Mitigated Negative Declaration Park Lane and Park Crest Lane, Zoning Change Dear Mr. Hogan: Deputy Directors of Public Works Wm. Butch Britt Transportation John C. Crowley Water Resources & Engineering Lane B. Holt Central Services Kay Martin Solid Waste Management Jeff Pratt Flood Control The Ventura County Flood Control District (District) has reviewed the submittal and determined that the project is adjacent to the Arroyo Simi, a District jurisdictional facility. Any encroachment to a District facility or right of way will require review and permitting by the District. The applicant should be made aware that there is a significant difference in the flow rates used to establish the FIRM Map flood zones and the design flow rates currently expected in a 100 -year storm. A drainage study should be done to assure safe building location and elevation. The applicant should also be informed that the project should be undertaken in accordance with conditions and requirements of the Ventura Countywide Stormwater Quality Management Program, National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Permit No. CAS004002, which includes the requirement for a Stormwater Pollution Control Plan (SWPCP) or equivalent document, covering water quality protection during the is Hall of Administration L # 1600 800 S. Victoria Ave, Ventura, CA 93009 • (805) 654 -2018 • FAX (805) 654 -3952 • www.ventura.org /VCPWA construction phase of the project and the Stormwater Quality Urban Impact Mitigation Plan (SQUIMP) requirements. If you have questions concerning this review, please call the undersigned at (805) 654- 2011. Very truly yo s, Fred Boroumand, P.E. Manager, Permit Section, Planning and Regulatory Division Flood Control Department FB /tt c: Ken Gilbert, City of Moorpark Joseph Eisenhut, RMA Planning, County of Ventura LOG NO. 20020621 -002 RPD No. 2002 -02 USA PROPERTIES FUND, INC. VINTAGE CREST SENIOR APARTMENTS CLARIFY CONDITION 49.: ecci v�d �r�� cc All existing and proposed utilities shall be undergrounded as approved by the City Engineer and Community Development Director, with the exception of the off -site overhead utilities on Park Lane between the project site and Los Angeles Avenue. A final determination of the need to remove the southernmost pole and underground utilities at that location will be at the discretion of the Community Development Director. ADD CONDITION: The City Manager is authorized to sign an early grading agreement, including expedited processing, on behalf of City to allow precise grading of the Project. Said early grading agreement shall be consistent with the conditions of approval for RPD 2002 -2 and contingent on City Engineer and Director of Community Development acceptance of a Performance Bond in a form and amount satisfactory to them to guarantee implementation of the erosion control plan and completion of the precise grading and construction of on -site and off -site improvements. In the case of failure to comply with the terms and conditions of the early grading agreement, the City Council may by resolution declare the surety forfeited. AMEND CONDITION 85: Prior to the first Zoning Clearance for residential unit building permit, Developer shall pay a fair -share contribution for intersection improvements for Los Angeles Avenue/Moorpark Avenue, Los Angeles Avenue /Spring Road and Spring Road/High Street. The level of fair -share participation shall be in the total amount of Four Thousand Dollars ($4,000.00). Rc e; v ee 4�,Or7l 7,/o/©z cc s��� ► al m�� Suggested Revisions to USA RPD Conditions 3. Use Inauguration: Unless the Residential Development Permit is inaugurated (building foundation slab in place and substantial work in progress) not later than two (2) years after this permit is granted, this permit shall automatically expire on that date. Upon application for an extension of time filed with the Community Development Director at least 30 -days prior to the expiration date, the Director may, at his /her discretion, grant up to one (1) one (1) year extension for project inauguration if there have been no changes in the adjacent areas and if Applicant can document that he /she has diligently worked towards inauguration of the project during the initial twoee -year period. 22. Within thirty (30) days of issuance of Zoning Clearance for a Grading Permit, the applicant shall submit a pedestrian, lk' /sea ing plan for the project for review n by e o unity Development Director. The pedestrian walking /seating plan shall include a seating area along the Arroyo where views of the Arroyo and wildlife can occur. The Plan shall be approved by the Community Development Director prior to issuance of Zoning Clearance for building permits for the fist apartment building. The pedestrian walking /seating plan may be submitted as part of the Landscape Plan. The landscape plan shall include a fencing plan which provides for a pedestrian gate in the property line fence along the Arroyo to allow pedestrian access from the project to a possible future trail. 80. Prior to submittal of grading plans the Developer shall have a geotechnical report prepared to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and at the minimum the geotechnical report shall address the following: a. The applicant or subsequent developers shall contract with an engineering geologist and geotechnical engineer to quantify the engineering properties of the on -site soil materials, to assess the potential for weak soils or bedding layers which may affect cut and /or natural slopes, and to verify that grading planned within the site is consistent with factors of safety approved by the City's consulting Geotechnical Engineers. This geotechnical study shall, as deemed necessary by the City Engineer and consulting City Geologist and Geotechnical Engineer, further assess slopes within or adjacent to proposed residential development areas. The findings and recommendations of the geotechnical assessment shall be incorporated into the final design for the project. b. The applicant will determine with subsequent geotechnical studies, the location of any landslide or unstable area, if existing or immediately adjacent to the site. Landslides and unstable areas shall be removed and recompacted during grading to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City's consulting geotechnical engineers. Alternatively, landslides or unstable slopes can potentially be stabilized by constructing buttress or stabilization fill slopes to reduce their potential for future down slope movement. All cut and fill slopes, foundations and structures, shall be designed and constructed to comply with Chapter 70 of the Uniform Building Code (UBC) and applicable City and /or Country Grading Ordinances. Modifications to these standards shall be permitted only with the written concurrence of the City Engineer and the City's consulting geologist. C. An engineering geologist shall define the final grading requirements for residential and recreational facilities. All geological recommendations shall be reviewed and approved by the City Engineer and the City's consulting geologist. Foundation designs in areas where fault traces were identified that have been deemed inactive should address enhancing the stability of homes in the event minor movement occurs as a secondary effect of ground shaking. d. The developer shall cause an engineering geologist to study all unanticipated faults exposed during grading to detect any evidence of possible recent activity. All active fault lines will be clearly shown on the grading plan. No structure shall be placed within 50 feet of any fault trace. e. All habitable structures shall be designed to accommodate structural impacts from 0.128- ground acceleration or other standard factor of safety deemed applicable to this project. The standards shall be prepared to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. f. The developer shall contract with an engineering geologist to prepare grading recommendations, foundation design criteria, and other recommendations regarding detailed project design. As a component of required subsequent geologic studies, a soils engineer shall evaluate the condition of alluvium and unconsolidated soils. Relatively loose soils or alluvium shall be densified or removed and recompacted prior to placement of structures upon such soils. Other mitigation measures shall be incorporated into the final project design as required by the geological assessment. All geological recommendations shall be to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. g. The Developer shall submit to the City Engineer for review and approval, detailed Geotechnical Engineering Reports certified by a California Registered Civil Engineer. The Geotechnical Engineering Report shall include an investigation with regard to liquefaction, expansive soils, and seismic safety. Also, the report shall discuss the contents of the soils as to the presence or absence of any hazardous waste or other contaminants in the soils. Should additional geotechnical studies be generated or required as a result of the geotechnical investigation, additional plan check fees will be required. h. Review of the Geotechnical Engineering Report, by the City's Geotechnical Engineer, is required. The Developer shall reimburse the City for all cost including the City's administrative fee for this review. i. All recommendations included in the approved Geotechnical Engineering XtiE ITION: The recommen a ions o Report shall be incorporated in the grading plan for the project design, gfading, anei pi�ejeet— The City's geotechnical consultant shall review all plans for conformance with the soil engineer's recommendations. Prior to the commencement of grading plan check, the Developer's geotechnical engineer shall sign the plans confirming that the grading plans incorporate the recommendations of the approved soil report(s).