HomeMy WebLinkAboutAGENDA REPORT 2003 0319 CC REG ITEM 09G' q. G.
CY ",--V
n r'f( ra ^•.)t" �'�, f �Fa;? f3'�'`TA
of
<f- C-1 SV,0 rvL<2- ZCV-1 �
MOORPARK CITY COUNCIL 1 �`
AGENDA REPORT 3y-
TO: Honorable City Council
FROM: Deborah S. Traffenstedt, ATCM /City Clerk 1-105-F
DATE: March 12, 2003 (CC Meeting of 3/19/03)
SUBJECT: Consider Resolution and Letter in Support of Santa
Monica Mountains Conservancy (SMMC) Advisory Committee
Exemption from State Directive to Limit Meetings to
Once Annually
BACKGROUND AND DISCUSSION
Councilmember Mikos currently represents the City of Moorpark on
the SMMC Advisory Committee, which has had a practice of meeting
monthly with the SMMC Board (typically, a total of ten or eleven
meetings annually). Historically, Advisory Committee expenses
have been nominal, since members serve without honorarium
compensation, and expense reimbursement has been limited.
In the Governor's Budget Summary (see Attachment 1), the
Governor directed that all State advisory boards and commissions
limit their meetings to one annually. The State Department of
Finance subsequently issued Budget Letter No. 03 -02 (see
Attachment 2) directing that all State advisory bodies are to
limit their meetings to one annually as directed in the 2003 -04
Governor's Budget Summary.
Councilmember Mikos is requesting that the City Council adopt a
resolution (see Attachment 3) in support of an exemption for the
SMMC Advisory Committee and also authorize the Mayor to sign a
letter to the Governor (see Attachment 4).
�OG162
Honorable City Council
March 19, 2003 Regular Meeting
Page 2
STAFF RECOWENDATION
Adopt Resolution No. 2003- and authorize the Mayor to sign a
letter in support of an exemption for the SMMC Advisory
Committee from an order of the Governor to require State
advisory bodies to limit meetings to once annually.
1. Governor's Budget Summary 2003 -2004, Page 216
2. State Department of Finance Budget Letter 03 -02
3. Draft Resolution
4. Draft Letter
01 (1) C G aj
ATTACHMENT
Controlling the Growth of State
Government
(GOVERNOR'S BUDGET SUMMARY 2003 -2004 PG. 216)
During the past year, the Administration has intensified its effort to limit the growth of
State government by imposing a hiring freeze on State employment and eliminating
more than 6,000 positions that were vacant at the end of the last fiscal year. The hiring
freeze will continue through this fiscal year. The Governor's Budget also proposes that
more than 1,900 additional positions be eliminated as part of the specific program
reductions proposed in this budget. These recent actions are in addition to the
elimination of 4,100 vacant positions in 2000- 01,and 2,500 vacant positions in 2001 -
02.Summary Schedule 4 in the Appendices shows that much of the State workforce,
more than 40 percent, is not under the direct control of the Administration —that is,
staffing can increase with or without the approval of the Administration. Included within
the remainder of the State workforce are the more than 65,000 positions in the
departments whose primary function is to ensure the safety of the public: Department of
Corrections, the California Youth Authority, the California Highway Patrol, and the
Department of Forestry and Fire Protection. The Administration recognizes the important
mission of the public safety agencies. Accordingly, the Administration has been careful
to ensure that these agencies have an adequate workforce to respond to unexpected
crises throughout its efforts to control the growth of the State workforce. While the
overall workforce under the Administration's control has declined by more than 1, 800,
the number of positions in the departments whose primary mission is public safety has
increased by 1 percent over the past year and 7.5 percent since1999- OO.This
Administration will be continuing its efforts to limit the size of the State workforce by
seeking efficiencies and identifying functions and activities that the State should no
longer be performing.
Department of Personnel Administration
(DPA)Staff —As a direct result of budget reduction proposals and the associated staff
reductions and potential layoffs, DPA will experience increased grievance and appeal
workload. To meet this additional workload, the Administration proposes 14.5 positions
and $1.7 million General Fund in 2002 -03and $1.8 million General Fund in 2003 -04.
Health and Dental Benefits for
Annuitants —The Governor's Budget includes an increase of $83.9 million General
Fund (from $576.6 million to$660.5 million) for vested annuitant health and dental
benefits in 2003 -04 due to health premium increases and enrollment growth.
Advisory Boards and Commissions —The Administration directs all advisory boards
and commissions to limit their meetings to one annually.
OC) 164
ATTACHMENT A
BUDGET E TT E R NUMBER: 03 -02
rUBJECT: ANNUAL MEETINGS FOR STATE ADVISORY BOARDS AND DATE ISSUED:
COMMISSIONS January 29, 2003
REFERENCES:
TO: Agency Secretaries
Department Directors
Department Budget Officers
Department of Finance Budget Staff
FROM: DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE
SUPERSEDES:
Budget Officers are requested to forward a copy of this budget letter to Departmental advisory
board and commission members.
As directed in the 2003 -04 Governor's Budget Summary (page 216), all State advisory bodies are to limit
their meetings to one annually, if such limitation does not require statutory change. This practice should
produce savings and contribute to the solutions to the budgetary shortfall. All advisory bodies are
requested to implement this new practice as soon as possible.
Per Government Code Section 13337.3 (a) (1), "Advisory body" means every board, bureau, commission,
committee, panel, task force, or similar group created by statute or executive order whose principal
function is to review, advise, plan, advocate, or promote.
If you have any questions, please contact your Finance budget analyst.
BETTY T. YEE
Chief Deputy Director
STATE OF CALIFORNIA �) CICIIJLGS
ATTACHMENT 3
RESOLUTION NO. 2003-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA, REQUESTING
AN EXEMPTION FOR THE SANTA MONICA MOUNTAINS
CONSERVANCY (SMMC) ADVISORY COMMITTEE FROM
AN ORDER OF THE GOVERNOR OF THE STATE OF
CALIFORNIA REQUIRING STATE ADVISORY BODIES
TO LIMIT MEETINGS TO ONCE ANNUALLY
WHEREAS, Governor Davis has stated as a part of his Budget
Summary: "The Administration directs all advisory boards and
commissions to limit their meetings to one annually "; and
WHEREAS, the State Department of Finance has issued Budget
Letter Number 03 -02 directing all State advisory bodies to so
limit their meetings; and
WHEREAS, the SMMC Advisory Committee currently falls under
this directive from the Governor and Department of Finance; and
WHEREAS, the City of Moorpark is represented on the SMMC
Advisory Committee; and
WHEREAS, the practice of the SMMC Advisory Committee for
the past fifteen years has been to meet jointly with the SMMC
Board monthly (typically a total of ten or eleven meetings
annually); and
WHEREAS, matters of critical and timely interest to the
City of Moorpark as well as other cities that value local
control are brought forth for consideration by the SMMC Advisory
Committee; and
WHEREAS, although SMMC Advisory Committee members are
entitled to reimbursement for "necessary expenses ", most members
do not seek reimbursement for these expenses and as a result the
expenses for the SMMC Advisory Committee have been nominal and
typically limited to: (1) mailing meeting materials; (2)
transportation of the SMMC Advisory Committee members for field
trips; and (3) dinners provided to SMMC Advisory Committee
members; and
WHEREAS, the importance of
continuing to meet regularly far
associated with the meetings; and
the SMMC Advisory Committee
outweighs the nominal costs
000166
Resolution No. 2003 -
Page 2
WHEREAS, the stated duties of the SMMC Advisory Committee
under Public Resources Code Section 33213 are to: "(1) Propose
and review projects for conservancy action and report to the
conservancy regarding the conformity of the projects with the
plan, (2) Review proposed amendments to the plan, and (3)
Provide opportunities for public participation. ", and such
duties cannot be carried out fully with only one meeting per
year; and
WHEREAS, such participation is at the heart of
representative democracy.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. The City of Moorpark hereby requests that the
Governor of the State of California grant an exemption for the
SMMC Advisory Committee from the policy of limiting State
advisory committee meetings to once annually.
SECTION 2. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of
this resolution and shall cause a certified resolution to be
filed in the book of original resolutions.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 19th day of March, 2003.
Patrick Hunter, Mayor
ATTEST:
Deborah S. Traffenstedt, City Clerk
100J.67
OFFICE OF THE MAYOR
March 20, 2003
The Honorable Gray Davis
Governor
State of California
State Capitol Building
Sacramento, CA 95814
Dear Governor Davis:
ATTACHMENT,
The Moorpark City Council is respectfully requesting that you
exempt the Santa Monica Mountains Conservancy (SMMC) Advisory
Committee from your newly- issued directive through the Department
of Finance that Advisory Committees meet only once annually.
The SMMC Advisory Committee has had a practice of meeting monthly
(typically, a total of ten or eleven meetings annually). They meet
together with the SMMC Board and conduct business necessary to this
City and other surrounding cities in Ventura and Los Angeles
Counties pertaining to preservation of open space land and
increasing recreational opportunities in the SMMC Zone /Rim of the
Valley Trail Corridor - -of which the City of Moorpark is a part. A
number of properties in and around Moorpark appear on the SMMC
adopted Work Program or are currently being managed by the SMMC.
This underscores the importance of maintaining active City
representation at joint SMMC Board and Advisory Committee meetings,
to comply with Public Resources Code 33213.
The geographic size of the SMMC Zone /Rim of the Valley Trail
Corridor is large, spanning at least 60+ miles from inland
mountains to the sea and upwards of 1,500 square miles. We believe
it is unwise and practically impossible to expect SMMC Board
Members to have sufficient knowledge of this entire area without
the benefit of timely discussion and debate by the local Advisory
Committee members, who best know the local conditions, and are most
qualified to provide the necessary information to lead to
meaningful SMMC Board decisions based on the best evidence for the
many areas under consideration.
300168
The Honorable Gray Davis
March 20, 2003
Page 2
Historically, Advisory Committee expenses have been nominal, since
members serve without honorarium compensation, and expense
reimbursement has been limited. It is our understanding that no
Advisory Committee member in the history of this body has ever even
requested mileage reimbursement. Therefore, unlike some advisory
boards, the SMMC Advisory Committee does not add materially to the
cost of SMMC Board meetings.
In summary, the presence of the Advisory Committee at each SMMC
Board meeting provides important and current input to the Board on
projects under consideration. Since the status of projects listed
in the Annual Work Program is fluid and constantly changing, a
single annual review by the Advisory Committee would be of limited
assistance. In fact, the City does not believe that the Advisory
Committee can adequately carry out its required duties under the
Public Resources Code if restricted to only one meeting per year.
Thank you for your consideration of the City Council's request to
allow the SMMC Advisory Committee to continue making its valuable
contribution through its joint meetings with the SMMC Board.
Sincerely,
Patrick Hunter
Mayor
Enclosure: City Council Resolution No. 2003-
cc: Senator Tom McClintock
Assembly Member Tony Strickland
Steve Peace, Director, State Department of
Joseph Edmiston, Executive Director, Santa
Conservancy
Honorable City Council
Finance
Monica Mountains
00169