Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAGENDA REPORT 2003 0521 CC REG ITEM 09EITEM q • E - LO k MOORPARK CITY COUNCILFY- kr „f_C C0- k o) AGENDA REPORT Yh TO: The Honorable City Council FROM: Kenneth C. Gilbert, Director of Public Works DATE: May 9, 2003 (Council Meeting 5- 21 -03) SUBJECT: Consider State Route 118 Safety Report Pertaining to the Possible Establishment of Restrictions on Non -Local Truck Traffic on Route 118 Between Route 23 and Route 232 [Vineyard Avenue] nTgrT1gqTnm A. Background • In the past the City has, on several occasions, made requests to Caltrans for the establishment a truck prohibition and /or restriction on Route 118 west of the Route 23 freeway. In response, Caltrans provided the City with the guidelines for the submittal of a formal application for such a request. • Due to the rather extensive and costly nature of that process required for such an application, the City Council directed staff to prepare a Request for Proposals (RFP) to retain a consultant to investigate the feasibility and cost of pursuing the development and processing of such a truck restriction application package. • An RFP was prepared and sent to a number of consultants. Initially the City received no response. Later Parsons Transportation Group [ "Parsons "] submitted a proposal and was ultimately selected to perform this study. B. Scope of Work Parsons was retained to perform a preliminary investigation of the requirements and processes related to the establishment of truck restrictions on a State Highway, and to provide recommendations regarding the feasibility and cost of developing, processing and administering an application to the California [State] Transportation Commission (CTC), for the establishment of truck restrictions on Highway 118 between the freeway and Vineyard Avenue (Route 232) [see Exhibit 11. Truck_Restr_0305 000027 Truck Restrictions May 9, 2003 Page 2 C. Task 1: NHS Designation Route 118 through Moorpark has been designated to be on the National Highway System [NHS]. The first task in Parsons' scope of work was to determine the effect, if any, of that designation on the prospects for establishing the desired truck restrictions. In November of 2002, the City Council considered a report from Parsons pertaining to their findings with respect to the NHS designation. It was the view of Parsons that truck restrictions could co -exist with the NHS designation. With that information it was determined that Task 2 - investigating the steps necessary to remove or revise longer necessary. D. Task 2 Revised: Safety Analysis the NHS designation - was no In the November 2002 report, Parsons pointed out that any truck restrictions established on any State Highway (including any route with a NHS designation) may only be established in order to address a "safety problem ". Accordingly, Parsons was directed to undertake a Safety Analysis of the subject highway segment for the purpose of determining if and how safety factors exist which could support the establishment of the desired truck restrictions. E. School Attendance At the November 2002 City Council meeting questions were raised about the possible safety / health impacts of diesel emissions from the Highway. In particular, concerns were expressed about the effect of such emissions on school attendance at Flory Elementary School. A report, prepared by staff, was provided to the City Council summarizing findings that school attendance at Flory Elementary School was equal to or better than attendance at other schools in the District. F. Safety Analysis Parsons has completed the requested Safety Analysis Report for the subject highway segment. A copy of that report has been provided to the City Council. The findings set forth in that report are generally summarized as follows: 1. Design Standards: Although many segments of the highway study area do not have an eight feet (8') wide paved shoulder or emergency stopping area, the highway meets conventional rural highway design standards. Truck_Restr -0305 000028 Truck Restrictions May 9, 2003 Page 3 2. Geometric Design: An effort was made to identify any "non- standard" geometric features (grades, curves, etc.) which could contribute to truck - related accidents. 3. Traffic Volume: Traffic volumes along the study corridor range from 29,400 to 57,800 vehicles per day, with ten percent (10 %) of those numbers being truck traffic. It is estimated that about sixty -five percent (650) of that traffic is not generated by the land uses along the study corridor. 4. Conejo Grade Truck Inspection Station: It is assumed that a significant number of trucks using the study corridor use this route to avoid the Conejo grade and /or the truck inspection station at the top of that grade. 5. Accident History: There have been approximately 345 accidents on the subject highway segment in the past nine (9) years. Of that number, about ten percent (10 %) were caused by trucks. It is the opinion of the California Highway Patrol (CHP) that the rate of truck related accidents on the study corridor is comparable to other similar type facilities. 6. Accident "Hot Spot ": A large number of the above cited accidents occurred at the Mesa curve about ten (10) miles west of Moorpark. Caltrans has taken measures to improve the safety of the highway at that location. Since those modifications, the accident rate in that reach of the highway has dropped. [Note: Caltrans has plans for the realignment of the highway at that location, which should further improve safety in this segment of the highway corridor.] 7. Environmental Assessment: An environmental assessment of the subject highway segment was performed. That assessment looked at noise impacts, threats to groundwater quality, air quality impairment and threatened environmentally sensitive areas. No significant negative impacts could be identified. G. Summary of Consultant's Findinqs: Recommendation Based on the above analysis, Parsons could not identify any strong or compelling reason to restrict non -local truck traffic on the study corridor. Instead of pursuing an application to the CTC for the establishment of such a restriction, Parsons suggests that the City pursue and support on -going efforts to construct a truck weigh / safety inspection station on Route 118 west of the City. Truck_Restr_0305 000029 Truck Restrictions May 9, 2003 Page 4 In discussions with City staff, Parsons acknowledged that they were aware of the fact that the City Council is very interested in pursing, through to success, the establishment of truck restrictions on study corridor. In spite of this awareness, it was and is the view of Parsons that, in light of the above findings, the pursuit of a truck restriction on the study corridor is not likely to succeed and the cost of such an effort would, therefore, not be a productive use of City resources. H. Safetv Justification As mentioned to the City Council in the November 2002 report, federal law does not allow the CTC to approve any restriction upon truck traffic, unless such restriction is established in order to address highway safety. It would be necessary, therefore, to include in any application package to CTC for the establishment of a truck restriction on the study corridor, a compelling argument, with supportive analysis statistical findings, demonstrating the existence of an "unsafe" condition. The study performed by Parsons did not identify factors in support of such an assertion. I. Options Options available to the City at this point include: 1. Concur with the Parsons' recommendations and drop further plans to seek the desired truck restrictions. 2. Direct staff to prepare an RFP to seek the services of another consultant to re- evaluate safety factors along the study corridor. 3. Direct Parsons, or another qualified consultant, to undertake Tasks 3 and 4 described below. J. Consultant Tasks 3 & 4 Tasks 3 & 4 in the Scope of Work in the Parsons' contract, calls for the preparation of a report describing the full requirements and costs for preparing, processing and administering a formal application package to Caltrans, for the establishment of truck restrictions on the subject highway segment. Such a report, if prepared, would provide the City with a better idea of the cost of developing the application package (including the EIR), and processing same through the required approval process at the local, District and State levels. Truck_Restr_0305 000030 Truck Restrictions May 9, 2003 Page 5 K. Consultant Cost Summar A summary of the costs for the Parsons' consultant services is as follows: Description Fee Amount ($) Task 1 2,706 Task 2 13,337 Sub -total completed Tasks 16,043 Task 3 7,724 Task 4 3,736 Sub -total of Tasks Not Yet Undertaken 27,503 Reimburseables 410 Total 27,913 Notes: Task 1: Analyze impact of NHS designation Task 2: Safety Analysis Task 3: Define application process and requirements Task 4: Final Report STAFF RECOMMENDATION 1. Direct staff to not proceed with the development of an application for a truck restriction on Route 118. 2. Direct staff to send a letter to the California Highway Patrol requesting increased enforcement at the existing truck inspection stations on Route 118. 3. Direct staff to send a letter to Caltrans requesting that the proposed construction of new truck inspection stations on Route 118 be undertaken as soon as possible. Attachments: Exhibit 1: Map Exhibit 2: Executive Summary Truck_Restr_0305 000 U.3 1 C) N 2 3 3 4 { OR, 4 5 6 -JE,1EN . Al'. r 5 Sg I 71- 6 7 7 5833 t 84 115 5 586 ,., �, ;78 1 2 ,' ©2002 Thomas Bros. Maps 2 D E F G H J A B C D E F G H J A B C D E F G H J A B C D E F G H J A B C D E F G H J A B C D E F G H J A B N, 1 <o s Item No. 9.E. MOORPARK CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT # # ## Supplemental # # ## TO: The Honorable City Council FROM: Kenneth C. Gilbert, Director of Public Works DATE: May 16, 2003 (CC Meeting 5- 21 -03) SUBJECT: State Route 118 Safety Analysis Attached is a copy of the subject study, which is to be considered by the City Council on May 21. Truck—ban-0205 rr 8 AW SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT STATE ROUTE 118 prepared for City of Moorpark State Route 118 PM 2.2 (SR 232) TO 17.49 (SR 23) 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark, California 93021 May 12, 2003 prepared by PARSONS SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT STATE ROUTE 118 City of Moorpark State Route 118 PM 2.2 (SR 232) TO 17.8 (SR 23) May 12, 2003 prepared by PARSONS 100 W. Walnut Street, Pasadena California, 91124 (626) 440 -6100 www.parsons.com Executive Summary This report documents the study completed by Parsons to determine the safety deficiencies of State Route (SR) 118 in the County of Ventura from State Route 232 at the west end to State Route 23 at the east. This study was developed to investigate the feasibility of restricting non - local truck traffic on this route. It involved reviewing reports, project as- builts and aerial photography, as well as other related technical documents. The existing roadway accommodated between 29,000 to 57,000 Annual Average Daily Traffic and truck traffic comprises 8% to 10% of the total traffic volume. The local farming industry and the Moorpark wastewater treatment facility generate 30% to 35% of the total truck traffic. Although not quantifiable, some truck traffic on SR 118 is due to truckers using the route as a bypass in order to avoid the more aggressively enforced weigh station on US 101. The latest accident data obtained from Caltrans and CHP from 1993 to 2002 shows that there have been a total of 345 accidents. 60 of that total have involved trucks and 34 of the 60 were attributed to trucks being at- fault. These figures represent accident rates consistent with other similar type of facilities and suggest that SR 118 is no more unsafe than any other State route. Truck Others Total Injury Fatal Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 5,175 46,225 51,400 Truck Prime Collision Factor 33 1 Collisions Involving Trucks 60 Total Collisions 60 285 345 A review of the current as -built plans for the route revealed that the only non - standard feature is the shoulder width that tapers down to less than 2 -feet on various locations along the route. These locations, however, do not constitute the majority of the route and there appears to be ample room to correct the deficiency if it is desired to do so. Within the route, there is a significant reversing curve near the Mesa School that has historically exhibited a concentration of accidents. These accidents, however, were mostly attributed to vehicles as oppose to trucks and Caltrans, since identifying the area as a "Hot Spot," has taken measures that should improve its safety performance in the future. An environmental assessment was conducted in order to identify any impacts that could justify a non -local truck restriction on SR 118. The findings of the assessment include the following: 1. Trucks do not significantly contribute to bad air quality 2. Existing noise levels created by truck traffic does not exceed the state noise criteria 3. Groundwater aquifers are not threatened by surface spills 4. Existing Biological areas within the study limits are not classified as unique sensitive receptors -ES- Based on the information obtained and the findings of this report, there does not appear to be a strong and compelling reason to restrict non -local truck traffic on State Route 118 and, therefore, it is recommended that the City not proceed with the truck restriction application. Instead, It is recommended that the weigh station on SR 118 be more aggressively enforced to discourage truckers from using SR 118 to by -pass the truck scales on US 101. -ES- — PARSONS 0 Safety Analysis Report State Route 118 CONTENTS SECTION 1 INTRODUCTION ..................................................................... ..............................1 2 BACKGROUND ....................................................................... ..............................1 3 RECORD REVIEW AND GEOMETRICS ............................... ..............................3 3.1 Records and Field Review ............................................ ..............................3 3.2 Geometrics .................................................................... ..............................3 4 TRAFFIC AND ACCIDENTS .................................................. ..............................8 4.1 Traffic ........................................................................... ..............................8 4.2 Accidents ...................................................................... ..............................8 5 ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ............................................... .............................12 5.1 Land Use ...................................................................... .............................12 5.2 Noise ............................................................................ .............................12 5.3 Hazardous Waste ......................................................... .............................13 5.4 Groundwater Quality and Biological Sensitive Areas .............................13 5.5 Air Quality ................................................................... .............................14 6 FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS ......................................... .............................15 7 REFERENCES ......................................................................... .............................16 APPENDIXES A SR 118 Highway Geometrics and Aerial Photography B Air Study on SR 118 C Reference Materials -iii- May 12, 2003 — PARSONS - — CONTENTS (Contd) FIGURES 1 Site Map, City of Moorpark, SR 118 (from PM 2.2 to PM 17 .49) ..........................2 2 S -Curve SR 118 PM 4.64, City of Moorpark, CA April 2003 .. ..............................4 3 S -Curve SR 118 PM 4.64, City of Moorpark, CA April 2003 .. ..............................5 4 Roadway Layout, SR 118 PM 4.64, City of Moorpark, CA April 2003 .................6 5 SRI 18, City of Moorpark .......................................................... ..............................7 TABLES 1 Year 2001 Traffic Volumes (vehicle AADT total) .................... ..............................8 2 Truck/Vehicle Collisions — Comparisons Ventura County Beat 55 (from Balcom Canyon Rd. to SR 232) from 1993 to 2002 ....... .............................10 3 Fatal and Injury Truck Collisions Trucks at Fault Ventura County Beat 55 (from Balcom Canyon Rd. to SR 232) from 1993 to 2002 ....... .............................10 ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS AASHTO American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials AADT annual average daily traffic BTEX benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, xylene Caltrans California Department of Transportation CFR Code of Federal Regulations CHP California Highway Patrol CO carbon dioxide CTC California Transportation Commission dBA decibel ampere DOT Department of Transportation ft foot FHWA Federal Highway Administration IS/EA Initial Study/Environmental Assessment ISA Initial Site Assessment m meter MVM million vehicle miles NHS National Highway System PCB polychlorinated biphenyls PM post mile PM10 particulate matter PSR Project Study Report SR State Route SSD sight- stopping distance STAA Surface Transportation Assistance Act TRPH petroleum hydrocarbons USGS U.S. Geological Society -iv- May 12, 2003 — PARSONS SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT STATE ROUTE 118 1 INTRODUCTION Ems' �I The City of Moorpark is seeking to restrict non -local truck traffic on State Route (SR) 118 between SR 232 and SR 23 in Ventura County. To that end, the City has retained the services of Parsons to determine if it is feasible to proceed with a Truck Restriction Application. As part of a previous task to determine if the National Highway System (NHS) designation on SR 118 could be removed, Parsons informed the City that, without a strong and compelling safety reason, the California Transportation Commission (CTC) could not impose a truck restriction. With that understanding in mind, the City instructed Parsons to proceed with a second task of performing a safety analysis to determine if safety deficiencies exist along the corridor that could justify restricting certain types of non -local truck traffic. This analysis (included herein) seeks to comply with that direction. 2 BACKGROUND SR 118 is an inter - regional highway traversing unincorporated areas of Ventura County as well as the cities of San Buenaventura (Ventura), Oxnard, Moorpark, and Simi Valley. The route is part of the truck network system under the California Surface Transportation Assistance Act (STAA) and the National Highway System (NHS). In Ventura County, SR 118 is an integral component of the existing Ventura County and regional roadway network system, providing the movement of goods and services between Los Angeles and Ventura Counties. Locally the roadway services the farming communities of Somis and Saticoy, as well as the rapidly developing and increasingly suburban City of Moorpark, please refer to Figure 1. Within the study limits, the route is designated a rural conventional highway located in a predominantly rural area that consists primarily of prime farmland. At the east end of the study limits, in the City of Moorpark, the highway is surrounded by developed land that consists of commercial and residential property. Major traffic generators include local and non -local pass - through vehicles and trucks destined for Port Hueneme and other points north including trucks servicing the local farmlands. The existing roadway configuration within the developed portion of the City (PM 16.15 to PM 17.49) is a four -lane highway with standard lanes, shoulders, and a standard median for left turns. Outside of the city proper (PM 2.2 to PM 16.15), the roadway configuration becomes a two -lane highway with standard lanes, standard and non - standard shoulders, and no median, please refer to Figure 2. -1- May 12, 2003 d 0 Figure l - Site Map City of Moorpark SR 118 -2- — PARSONS 4* 3 RECORD REVIEW AND GEOMETRICS 3.1 RECORDS AND FIELD REVIEW Existing information on SR 118 was obtained from Caltrans, the CHP, and other agencies and businesses that had pertinent safety information on the route. From Caltrans, Parsons obtained roadway as -built plans, aerial photography, and accident data (as- builts and aerial photography are included in Appendix A) as well as Project Study Reports (PSRs) and environmental documents for a number of proposed improvements within the study limits. The CHP provided information on causes of accidents from 1993 to 2002, associated traffic incidents, and insight into the functionality of SR 118 as it pertains to truck traffic within the study limits. To better appreciate the traffic characteristics, land use, and site geometrics on the route, Parsons conducted a number of field visits and interviews with businesses currently using the highway facility. 3.2 GEOMETRICS Parsons reviewed the latest as -built plans to assess the existing roadway geometrics and to identify any non - standard design features that could contribute to truck - related accidents. The review concluded that the existing roadway is constructed on flat topography having essentially a straight alignment with the exception of two curves with one occurring neat. the Mesa School and the other between Balcom Canyon Road and Tierra Rejada Road. The curve near the Mesa School is an S -curve involving four reversing curves with radii that vary from 300 to 350 feet. The S -curve is rated for 50 miles per hour (mph), however, in order to improve the stopping sight distance (SSD), a suggested speed limit of 35 mph is posted. The curve section between Balcom Canyon Road and Tierra Rejada Road involves a slight reversing curve with standard radii of 450 and 700 feet that is rated for a design speed of 50 mph. The review also concluded that the existing lanes along the entire alignment are standard 12 -foot lanes with standard and non - standard shoulders (Please refer to L -38 to L -41 in Appendix A). In accordance with the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO), the standard shoulder for rural highways is 4 feet. Generally speaking, most of the alignment within the study area has standard shoulders. There are, however, some segments where the shoulder reduces to less than 2 feet. Specifically, non - standard shoulders were observed in both directions between PM 10.5 and PM 10.7, PM 6.5 and PM 8.2, and at all locations where there is a left turn pocket. Parsons conducted a field observation in which trucks were followed to analyze their movements and observe how they negotiated the roadway. It was concluded that most of the trucks, either single- or double -axle vehicles, were able to negotiate the turns along this route without incidents. Only at the S -curve location, and at sections where the shoulder is less than the standard 4 feet it was observed that trucks touched the outside striping line of the shoulder. Please refer to Figures 3 and 4. -3- May 12, 2003 111,11 X1 SR 118 City Moorpark of (o A� i AV a 4L EL. t E0 ! � ti . , ti meyard ( 232) Q 7 BER`'LWO 041 SAT {CO / *N �� �� 1 / i A rrtor � P ATiCOY l 'ZS �, r 2` REGIONAL ,a rCC1 +JNTX1t } GOLF COURSE �� FEE Ci�6 )�, Q o°c 4d 11 . `f , �C R s / 1-RAVEL Pr i y ARD WINERY C�`r '' ♦ =r FL RIO 2 ^�' �� < ` VENTURA iCN f fl h� s�TA'F OT CL rovrH .aur- D ;,Elv�`� L w a� z ( a � > LOS ANGELES 6? Q LASPoSas c c CHE�C�T$� NtLL$ON 1.00 4 Study Area (project limits) = "Hot Spots ", accident segments ,8RQADWAY� Ku izr Ci RINK ' �� '� 1 ,W �`� ¢� ti�SR 2 l4OORPARX EL SflC1 j•l C ' Res. I tH r4 sC>rr s'� ,� vA� • t ? is i ` G t i Um c Simla VA O� +JMBRE ad AVE i 8 SONS t o ,- ;- Jp�rt °, EL 290 hiRF SrA PttAidNF �' YAi:f'� \' HosP 57 1OF+N5 •J 0► ,arss�ou 6 EL. SUOTfE��A Z 4 PpS S . moo REED A Las HOME ACRE S W 6 o S �R =S +iLP L-A 5 L s ra y OPRR 40 ll LAS n t't OWN-, �UQ a i SAN7A 3 5A y A 1� 9 tto / " PLEASANT OAKS OK / RADf OwEa �� a VAL 7 PARR n 44 q � EL. 71�D � ��"� 9 Lis �" e> � °� oar �05�' / �Q! ���i� n r`?�' *�^cm -M l,•° per' ZP °j LEISURE O / V "z IN 'PCy Gc� yPN ./ ; VILLAGE G.C. t at u�l IYTtlR 4 1 i ,,' Q 7 31 ,`16 / tt�`' 1b Rin M ,! EXISTING 2-LANE 9 r I\ i 4 0 0 -AMARILLO t E, isoc.raoacrerw�o,_ It t� I L `S" curves in the vicinity of Mesa School (suggested speed 35mph) Eastbound L Westbound m a� 0 0 L L U7 U) Standard two -lane highway PM 2.2 to PM 16.15 4- Mount Chet 8 Z Arr`�� _ / E: 9Q IN { M`U�TCtE� : atr� ` r �1� r!��Aa,v a r . j r l- , uwv 4 � �GYltd1'Yfl'td) 17 AVE 70E L APB ( RECD .. 00 0 0 L0S ROBLES l c EXISTING 4 LANE from PM 16.15 to 17.49 Eastbound Westbound � a� 0 0 L U) � U) Standard four -lane highway PM 16.15 to PM 17.49 Figure 2 i i I j I i I I t i) a ll I t i I I 1 j I j 11 t I t i 1 I t I i I I t I �s oc w n rn c CL Truck with the rear wheel line touching the outside striping line at the S- curve. Radius: 300' and 350' Figure 3- S -Curve (eastbound) PM 4.64 City of Moorpark, CA April 2003 I 11 t j i 1 1 1 11 1 E j t I [ i t I t i 1 I a ii ! I ! I t i k 1 i I t 1 M Ir UG C -C� C/7 _n �i C CD Truck negotiating the S -curve on SR 118, Radius: 300' and 350' PM 4.84 Figure 4 - S -Curve (Westbound) City of Moorpark, CA April 2003 I i i i I! I I I i k I ! i 1 I i i t j t l t i r i a i t i 1 i a i i I i I J ITI 7Q (D Vi V: C: o' R/Mf ar R/U ,_60-80' S VARIES - — EP EP TypeO METAL BEAM ". GUARDRAIL ETV E ETV (VAR. DEPT.. TCH ZX i YAR.� 1 2X i YAR. •• DER BACKING.. iBOTH SIDES i EXISTING P.C.C. EXISTING A.C. TYPICAL SECTION STA. 16.811.76 TO STA. 296.36 T -0.50' STA. 296.66 TO STA. 702-92 STA. 703.22 TO STA. 746 -00 T -0.50' Riw Type O f I F Typeo 2'- A'2' W 12' 'I--- 10' � 12'— VAR IABL I I E L \ 72 1 VAR. 1 77 1 VAR_ LEXISTING P.C.C. EXISTING A. C. TYPICAL LEFT TURN POCKET (APPROACHING THE INTERSECTION OF THE STREET) STA. 16.88.76 TO STA. 296.36 T -0.50' STA. 296.66 TO STA. 702.92 T -0.65' STA. 703.22 TO STA. 746.00 T -0.50' R/11 EP SHOULDER BACKING. BOTH SIDES MATCH EXf-00- Figure 5 - SR 118 at Balcom Canyon Road City of Moorpark, CA April 2003 - PARSONS 4 TRAFFIC AND ACCIDENTS 4.1 TRAFFIC The annual average daily traffic (AADT) for year 2001 was obtained from Caltrans and is shown in Table 1. It can be seen from Table 1 that the total AADT volume for the corridor ranges from 29,400 to 57,800 vehicles per day and trucks comprise 8% to 10% of the total traffic volume. Major traffic generators for the corridor include vehicles servicing the local farmlands and trucks destined for the port in the city of Port Hueneme and other points north. Although not quantifiable, some truck traffic on SR 118 is also attributed to truckers using this route in order to avoid the CHP- enforced weight scales on US 101. It should be noted that SR 118 also has the ability to weigh trucks, however, the perception is that these scales are not as heavily enforced as US 101. Another truck generator within the study limits is the Moorpark Wastewater Treatment Facility. Currently, this facility generates truck traffic as a result of transporting wastewater solids. The facility is in the process of being upgraded to increase treatment capacity, and this is expected to increase the number of truck trips generated. Table 1 -Year 2001 Traffic Volumes (vehicle AADT total) Location Lanes Mainline Volumes Total Freeway Segment Volumes % Trucks Mainline PM Truck Others Total SR 118 SR 118 at SR 232 _ 2 2.2 Eastbound (truck AADT) 2,018 18,782 20,800 20,800 10 SR 118 at SR 34 2 10.92 1,712 15,788 17,500 17,500 10 SR 118 at SR 23 2 17.49 2,606 30,894 33,500 33,500 8 SR 118 SR 118 at SR 232 _ 2 2.2 Westbound (truck AADT) 2,775 34,225 37,000 37,000 8 SR 118 at SR 34 2 10.92 1,304 10,596 11,900 11,900 11 SR 118 at SR 23 2 17.49 2,569 15,331 17,900 17,900 14 SR 118 SR 118 at SR 232 2 2.2 SR 118 from Vineyard to SR 23 (truck AADT) 4,793 53,007 57,800 57,800 8 SR 118 at SR 34 2 10.92 3,016 26,384 29,400 29,400 10 SR 118 at SR 23 2 17.49 5,175 46,225 51,400 51,400 10 4.2 ACCIDENTS Accident data were obtained from Caltrans and updated with more recent data from the CHP (Table 2). The accident records reveal an accident rate of 3.56 accidents per million vehicle miles (MVM), which is higher than the state average of 2.25 MVM when compared to similar types of facilities between the years of 1993 and 2002. Table 2 shows that a total of 345 vehicle injury collisions were recorded between the years of 1993 and 2002. Of those 345 collisions, 60 were truck - involved collisions. -8- May 12, 2003 — PARSONS F " 3 During the same period, a total of 15 fatal vehicle collisions occurred and of those 15 fatal vehicular collisions, 5 involved trucks. Table 3 shows that of the 60 truck involved collisions, 34 were collisions where trucks were directly at fault and of these 34 at -fault collisions, one resulted in a fatality. According to the Ventura County CHP, the rate of truck related accidents on SR 118 are within the expected rates for other similar type facilities (SR 126). _�_ May 12, 2003 — PARSONS �r Table 2— Truck/Vehicle Collisions – Comparisons Ventura County Beat 55 (from Balcom Canyon Rd. to SR 232) from 1993 to 2002 Collision Year 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 Total Total fatal collisions 0 3 6 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 15 Fatal truck collisions 0 2 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 5 Percentage of total 0 66.6 16.6 0 100 0 0 0 0 100 0 Total injury collisions 40 43 51 42 26 21 22 33 27 40 345 Injury truck collisions 10 6 10 7 7 3 6 3 2 6 60 Percentage of total 25 13.9 19.6 1 16.6 1 26.91 14.2 1 27.2 1 9.09 1 7.4 1 15 1 Table 3 —Fatal and Injury Truck Collisions – Trucks at Fault Ventura County Beat 55 (from Balcom Canyon Rd. to SR 232) from 1993 to 2002 Collision Year 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 Injury Injury Injury Injury Fatal Injury Injury Injury Injury Injury Injury Unsafe Speed 4 3 3 1 0 3 2 1 2 1 3 Following Too Closely 0 Wrong Side of Road 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 Improper Passing 1 1 0 0 Unsafe Lane Change 1 0 Improper Turning 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 1 Automobile Right -of -Way 1 1 0 0 0 Traffic Signals and Signs 0 0 Unsafe Starting or Backing 0 0 0 Other Hazardous Violation 0 0 0 0 Total, yearly 7 4 5 2 1 3 2 3 2 1 4 Note: Truck driver was at fault on all shown. Grand Total, Collisions 34 Caltrans has included SR 118 in the Safety Corridor Program that monitors and studies data to evaluate a route's safety features. In September 1999, the Office of Traffic Investigations at Caltrans developed a map showing the locations of reoccurring accidents on this route. The accident locations are shown on Figure 2. One "hot spot" where collisions continually reoccur is near the Mesa Road School where the S -curve is located. In discussing the nature of these accidents with the Ventura County CHP, Parsons was informed that these accidents involved mostly vehicles and were not related to trucks. Caltrans, in order to improve this situation, has since implemented a number of safety improvements that include lane re- striping and a suggested posted speed limit that reduces speeds along the S -curve to 35 mph. Please refer to Figures 3 and 4 for the S -curve detailed drawing. -10- May 12, 2003 — PARSONS The other "hot spot" that exhibits a number of accidents is between Balcom Canyon Road and Tierra Rejada Road. The accidents at this location have been mostly attributed to unsafe speeds through a gentle curve (Figure 5, cross section). Here too, the accidents were mostly related to vehicles as oppose to trucks. It should be noted that the shoulder widths along this segment of the study area tapers down to less than 2 feet. However, it should also be noted that there appears to be ample room to provide standard shoulders. -11- May 12, 2003 — PARSONS 7 5 ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW Parsons reviewed several environmental reports to analyze the environmentally sensi ve areas and to identify any noise, hazardous waste, and biological concerns within the stu imits that could be adversely impacted by non -local truck traffic. These reports included a S for Mesa Road School, several noise reports on Donlon Road, an Initial Site Assessment A) and an Initial Study/Environmental Assessment (IS/EA) for the once proposed improvements at the State Route 34 and Donlon Road intersection. Additionally, Parsons conducted site visits to better understand the surrounding biological environment and the existing land uses and conducted an air quality study in order to make an assessment of the existing air quality and how it might be affected by truck traffic. 5.1 LAND USE The project limits are located in the Las Posas Analysis Zone, which also includes the Somis and La Cumbre Road communities. The Ventura County General Plan, amended October 28, 1997, classifies the Las Posas Analysis Zone as a nongrowth area (i.e., an area that is not expected to receive significant urban development) with the exception of the community within the city of Moorpark, which included residential and commercial areas. The Las Posas Analysis Zone, which covers 26,482 acres, has 17,500 acres of agricultural (or 8% of Ventura County farmland), 8,525 acres of open space, and 400 acres of rural land use. The land uses within the reaches of the highways are a mixture of agricultural, industrial, residential, and commercial. One important industrial facility is the Moorpark Wastewater Treatment Facility. Ventura County is one of the principal agricultural counties in the state, ranking eleventh in 1997 with a total income of $942 million. The acreage for farming comprises 27% of the land (320,597 acres) in the county. The average market value of agricultural products per farm was $304,249 with a net average per farm of $52,729. 5.2 NOISE The noise study conducted in 1998 for the Mesa School PSR demonstrated that the existing noise levels near the Mesa School do not exceed the 67dBA (Leq) specified by FHWA regulations (23 CFR 772). The noise prediction model used in the Mesa School report is referred to as the San Francisco Highway Traffic Noise Prediction Program. It is based on the theory presented in the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) report, FI WA -RD -77 -108. In March 2000, an IS/EA was prepared for SR 34 ( Somis Road) and Donlon Road. A field measurement was conducted to document the existing noise levels at the intersection of SR 34 and Donlon Road. The investigation concluded that the predicted exterior noise levels for the residential area north of SR 118 do not exceed the 67 dBA. -12- May 12. 2003 — PARSONS 5.3 HAZARDOUS WASTE A review of the aerial photographs, the U.S. Geological Society (USGS) topographic maps, an ISA developed for Mesa Road School, an IS/EA for SR 34 and Donlon Road, and other documents from the Ventura County Department of Public Works determined that trucks have not been associated with hazardous waste impacts within the project limits. These documents indicate several potential contaminated areas. The contaminants are predominantly benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, xylene (BTEX), pesticides, polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), and herbicides associated with agricultural activities. These contaminants appear to be present in the surficial soil adjacent to SR 118. The BTEX, petroleum hydrocarbons (TRPH), and lead contaminants are associated with the Alliance Somis Supply (gasoline station) property and are not aerially deposited lead from the roadway or truck diesel leaks. The ISA conducted for the Mesa School project concluded that the presence of hazardous materials /wastes within the subject site is considered low. The IS/EA for SR 34 and Donlon Road found some contaminants in privately owned properties and identified these as leaks from diesel tanks and pipelines. The IS/EA also concluded that the presence of environmental sensitive areas is considered low. 5.4 GROUNDWATER QUALITY AND BIOLOGICAL SENSITIVE AREAS The project limits do not contain unique geologic features or steep topography. The San Pedro Formation contains the Epworth gravel and Fox Canyon aquifer zones. The area of North Las Posas Groundwater Basin within the project limits is considered confined due to a clay cap over usable aquifers. The minimum depth to aquifer water is 35 ft, the maximum depth to groundwater is 130 ft, and the average depth is 50 ft, as measured in groundwater wells in the site vicinity. According to the State Water Resources Quality Assessment, groundwater occurring within the North Las Posas Groundwater Basin has existing beneficial use designations for municipal, agricultural, industrial, residential, and commercial purposes. Although BTEX contaminants were once detected in the groundwater in 1984, records show that the sources were diesel storage tanks and some pipelines. The biologically sensitive areas within the project limits are Puerta Auela Creek, Fox Canyon Creek, and Coyote Canyon Creek. Coyote Creek is covered with vegetation with minor silt deposits where it meets Fox Canyon; the majority of this vegetation is non - native and thus is not classified as singular or sensitive to this topographic area. The water flow in these creeks is extremely variable and would reach its high flow period during the local wet season. Pecause 1e ow of these creeks is extremely variable and due to the native topography's transformation "these creeks do not re resent a drinkin w efit nor do they connect within important o ue tributaries During a given rainfall, water is continually being o saturate the upper levels o the soil; however, this saturation is only one of continuous abstractions. The surficial plants, soils and geologic formations impede direct conveyance of any type of flow. Rainfall is also intercepted by trees, plants, and roof surfaces and, at the same time, is evaporated. These site conditions make it unlikely for unwanted contaminant material to reach larger bodies of water such as the Santa Clara River, which is further down stream of the study area. There are no wild or scenic rivers existing within the limits of the project. 13 May 12, 2003 1- — PARSONS 5.5 AIR QUALITY niw Parsons prepared an air quality study to assess the truck emissions and their potential impact to sensitive receptors. A computer model was used to predict the ambient concentrations of particulate matter (PM10) and carbon dioxide (CO). The data used for the air quality model consists of coordinates from topographical maps, number of vehicles per segment, meteorological data, width of highway lanes, residential and school locations, and other potential sensitive receptors. The study concluded that the predicted truck emissions are less than 2.1 % of the measured ambient air quality concentrations, meaning that the level of emissions from trucks is very little and may pose an insignificant impact to any sensitive receptors. The air quality study in its entirety is included in Appendix B. V L -14- May 12, 2003 — PARSONS 6 FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS State Route 118 currently accommodates 29,400 to 57,800 vehicles per day with trucks comprising 8% to 10 % of the total traffic volume. An estimated 30% to 35% of the truck traffic on the route is generated locally from the local farm industry and the wastewater treatment plant located within the study limits. Although not quantifiable, some truck traffic is also due to truckers avoiding the CHP weight enforcement scales on US 101. The geometric review of the existing facility did not reveal any significant non - standard design features that could contribute to truck related accidents. There are two curve locations along the route and both are rated for a design speed of 50 mph. There are locations along the study area where the existing roadway section does not have standard shoulders. These locations, however, do not constitute the majority of the study area and there appears to be ample room to provide standard shoulders if required to do so. There have been a total of 345 accidents on this route from 1993 to 2002 with one truck -at -fault fatality. The accidents findings suggest two locations within the study limits where accidents have reoccurred. These locations include the S -curve near the Mesa School and the curve section between Balcom Canyon Road and Tierra Rejada Road. Accidents at these two locations are attributed to unsafe speeds with trucks being involved in only 10% of these accidents. Within the last two years, Caltrans has made safety improvements along the S -curve that is expected to reduce the number of future accidents at this location. These improvements include a suggested speed limit of 35 mph, reflective markers, flashing intermittent beacons, and lane re- striping. The PM10 and CO emission concentrations resulting from the traffic on SR 118 are very low compared to the measured ambient air quality data. This evaluation suggests that the truck traffic on SR 118 near Moorpark is not significantly contributing to negative air quality. Due to the natural confinement of aquifers and the inconsistent flow of creeks, the potential risk of infiltration from surface truck spills and subsequently, the contamination of groundwater is considered low. Historically, there has not been a case of truck diesel spills from collisions or other operations; the only found BTEX and TRP -H contaminated soils were found in 1984 and these were due to leaks in storage tanks and oil pipelines. The findings of the noise studies recently completed within the study area suggest that the noise created by the truck traffic is not significant. Based on the information obtained and the findings of this report, there does not appear to be a strong and compelling reason to restrict non -local truck traffic on State Route 118 and is therefore recommended that the City not proceed with the truck restriction application. Instead it is recommended that the weigh station on SR 118 be more aggressively enforced to discourage truckers from using SR 118 to by -pass the truck scales on US 101. -15- May 12, 2003 7 REFERENCES Presented here is a list of documents researched for this report: Air Quality Analysis, Intersection Improvements, Donlon Road and Somis Road, Caltrans District 7, 1999. California Vehicle Code, Surface Transportation Assistance Act, DOT 2002. Combustion Emission Factors, VCAPCD 2001. Final Environmental Impact Statement, SR 23 and SR 118, Freeway Gap Closure, Caltrans District 7, 1989. Hazardous Waste Clearance Intersection Improvements, Donlon Road and Somis Road, Caltrans District 7, 1999. Historic Architectural Survey Report, SR 118 Realignment Project at Mesa School, EA 172900, Caltrans District 7, 1999. Initial Study/Environmental Assessment (IS/EA), SR 118 at SR 34 Intersections Improvements, Caltrans District 7, 2000. Noise Study Report, SR 118 near Mesa School, Caltrans District 7, 1998. Physical Environmental Report, Donlon Road and Somis Road, Caltrans District 7, 1999. Planned Utilization of the Groundwater Basins of the Coastal Plain of California, Departnient of Water Resources 1988 and 2001. Project Study Report (PSR), SR 118 at Mesa School, Caltrans District 7, 1996. Traffic Volumes on California State Highway System, DOT 2001. Truck Restriction Procedures, DOT 2002. Truck Restriction Study, Otay Lakes Road to SR 188, Caltrans District 11, 1999. Truck Route Classifications, DOT 2001. -16- May 12, 2003 Tables Table 4 -1 Year 2001 Traffic Volumes Vehicle AADT Total Location Lanes Mainline Volumes Freeway Segment -F Trucks Mainline PM Truck Others Total SR 118 SR 118 at SR 232 2 2.2 Annual Average Daily Truck Traffic (Eastbound) 2,018 18,782 20,800 20,800 10% SR 118 at SR 34 2 10.92 1,712 15,788 17,500 17,500 10% SR 118 at SR 23 2 17.49 2,606 30,894 33,500 33,500 8% SR 118 SR 118 at SR 232 2 2.2 Annual Average Daily Truck Traffic (Westbound) 2,775 34,225 37,000 37,000 8% SR 118 at SR 34 2 10.92 1,304 10,596 11,900 11,900 11% SR 118 at SR 23 2 17.49 2,569 15,331 17,900 17,900 14% SR 118 SR 118 at SR 232 2 2.2 Annual Average Daily Truck Traffic SR 118 from PM 2.2 to PM 17.49 4,793 53,007 57,800 57,800 8% SR 118 at SR 34 2 10.92 3,016 26,384 29,400 29,400 10% SR 118 at SR 23 2 17.49 5,175 46,225 51.400 51,400 10% Table 4 -2 Truck/Vehicle Collisions - Comparisons Ventura County Beat 55 (from Balcom Canyon Rd. to SR 232) From 1993 to 2002 Collision Year Total fatal collisions 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 0 3 6 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 Fatal truck collisions 0 2 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 Percent of total 0 66.6 16.6 0 100 0 0 0 0 100 Total injury collisions 40 43 51 42 26 21 22 33 27 40 Injury truck collisions 10 6 10 7 7 3 6 3 2 6 Percent of total 25 13.9 19.6 16.6 26.9 14.2 27.2 9.09 7.4 15 Table 4 -3 SR 118 EXISTING AM/PM Peak Hour and Daily Traffic Volumes ,� 111 SR 118 at SR 23 Collision Year PCF category Table4 -4 Fatal and Injury Truck Collisions Truck Primary Collision Factor Ventura County Beat 55 (from Balcom Canyon Rd. to SR 232) From 1993 to 2002 1993 11994 11995 11996 11997 1 11997 11998 11999 2 12000 12001 12 002 Injury Injury Injury Injury Fatal Injury Injury Injury Injury Injury Injury Unsafe Speed 4 3 3 1 0 3 2 1 2 1 3 Following Too Closely 0 Wrong Side Of Road 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 Improper Passing 1 1 0 0 Unsafe Lane Change 1 0 Improper Turning 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 1 Automobile Right -Of -Way 1 1 0 0 0 Traffic Signals And Signs 0 0 Unsafe Starting Or Backing 0 0 0 Other Hazardous Violation 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 TOTAL 7 1 4 5 2 1 1 1 3 1 2 1 3 2 1 1 4 Total 34 Note: Truck Driver Was At Fault On All Shown. Appendix A Highway Geometrics & Aerial Photography rx L ----------- zcz;, -jF xtiz-. � She-t 110. 1 7111: :;:-•G LOC.C-ti-:otl UX, 2 - 5 T,Piccs cr,:!S: 5--- 7-vi LOYOUT 5 .1 g�e :-on -t., Traffic Hzr.,! I I r� F I G7, Cns-r,-x--i,Ion A-tc S!,- xis 95-96 Pra vPmer, t Eke I i r�ec t i 0. i 97-9?- Sur.3ry of Oucr.-, i e s i- 2 I;* to A OXNARD coumTv DIST ST .4 TE OF CALFORMA 07 ven Ila F-P118(32) DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORT AT!ON PROJECT PLANS FOR CONSTRUCTION ON STATE HIGHWAY _ tt i IN VENTURA COUNTY IN AND NEAR OXNARD AND MOORPARK FROM ROUTE 232 TO ROUTE 23 To ba supvk~ted ty Standard Plans dated Januory, 11388 7. BEGIN WORK AND CONSTRUCTION STA 15- 88.76 PU 2.2 4r 15 LOCAT13N W Cof J;)° 4- 'k -e 7 c z LOS 39 ANGELES AVE ROUTE 118 AS BUILT PLANS Contract Na D7 /,0 Y-gy Date Completed Q/ Document Na -4 AjIGEL f f LOS ROUTE CITY LikAiT END WORK AND CONSTRUCTION ATA 291- On . T I ON THI S PORT ;ON T P1.4 15. 58! 15. 75 -7, C rx L ----------- zcz;, -jF xtiz-. � She-t 110. 1 7111: :;:-•G LOC.C-ti-:otl UX, 2 - 5 T,Piccs cr,:!S: 5--- 7-vi LOYOUT 5 .1 g�e :-on -t., Traffic Hzr.,! I I r� F I G7, Cns-r,-x--i,Ion A-tc S!,- xis 95-96 Pra vPmer, t Eke I i r�ec t i 0. i 97-9?- Sur.3ry of Oucr.-, i e s i- 2 I;* to A OXNARD coumTv DIST ST .4 TE OF CALFORMA 07 ven Ila F-P118(32) DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORT AT!ON PROJECT PLANS FOR CONSTRUCTION ON STATE HIGHWAY _ tt i IN VENTURA COUNTY IN AND NEAR OXNARD AND MOORPARK FROM ROUTE 232 TO ROUTE 23 To ba supvk~ted ty Standard Plans dated Januory, 11388 7. BEGIN WORK AND CONSTRUCTION STA 15- 88.76 PU 2.2 4r 15 LOCAT13N W Cof J;)° 4- 'k -e 7 c z LOS 39 ANGELES AVE ROUTE 118 AS BUILT PLANS Contract Na D7 /,0 Y-gy Date Completed Q/ Document Na -4 AjIGEL f f LOS ROUTE CITY LikAiT END WORK AND CONSTRUCTION ATA 291- On . T I ON THI S PORT ;ON T P1.4 15. 58! 15. 75 uj z -j -4S it /C oeos MOORPARK IL Z C uj z -j -4S it /C oeos MOORPARK IL Z m .(1j II STATE OF CALIFORNIA - DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION PROJECT ENGINEER CALCULATED/ cc REVISED By DESIGNED BY RT DA _ ­ ] . ­. - DATE C& PROJECT DEVELOPMENT P.H.HSU CHECKED BY E E REVISED 0 m cn rn Co G)0 f P^� _ to > O C) x 11 11 o Ii, nl iii 1� s. Irl 'c ICI ITt LA VINEYARD.AV.E �4 r at . ........... . ....... ... . ...... t. :Z4 z co P z N 00 Uj A W Co N, kn 9 (A o I. Ln S P MILLING ..... ... .. . ... ... rm 0 z m I _ i1 rr z P Z_ > rn Li ;1 O N: 7. I MATCH LINE STA, 24-00 T 0 I X U. (J 0 w 0 > 2 �6 2 W 3 n 0 13 Ti Z cn w 0-! ;v 0 >. IV 0. F CALIFORNIA • DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORT ra/btXnS PPOJEdl DEVELOPMENT rN N x ROJECT ENGINEER CALCULATED/ DESIGNED BY Cr DOTE . REVISED BY — —.— — -i -- -- — P. H. HSU CHECKED BY FIT -- -- DATE REVISED MATCH LINE STA 24400 A on no m1 -c r'n m j GI M MATCH LINE STA 39+00 x dL. I-- W e. z 0 LLI Us LLJ C I-- La 0 ir O IML -C .O•R, DC- -12— IRE, 3146, L OVERLAY - -TO MATCH EXIST- GRADE - TYP. LEGEND tNTX. = INTERSECTION (TYP.) MSTJ COLS', I ROUTE Z,; .07: Ven I Ile 2-2/17.5 9 S8 za i '7 AS BUILT CONTRACT NO E03494 RESIDENT ENGR.G-C Ethier DATE -30-91 �AS BUILT PLANS Contract No 47- FOR REDUCED PL4NS Date Completed ---JL-,ja - 91 C Document NO. - OAIGSAL SCALE IS M INRCIES !CU 07203 29XI -E E5Y CER71 71A7 -15.1 7-Z 11„ C--E COPY OF TIE ,0jE OCUIEN7 7AIEh LAYOUT SCALE- 1", 50' L-3 EA 10349, Z NOTEs FOR COMPLETE-RIGHT OF WAY DATA. SEE RIGHT OF WAY MAPS AT DISTRICT x OFFICE. U Wb 0 ad 0 F.. r - S TA- 45- APPROX. INTX- EP 1\ ETW in 7-7 -C4 ROUTE 118. 404,00 Vu I z ut z P— PEP TW 300' R/W YIN. d x dL. I-- W e. z 0 LLI Us LLJ C I-- La 0 ir O IML -C .O•R, DC- -12— IRE, 3146, L OVERLAY - -TO MATCH EXIST- GRADE - TYP. LEGEND tNTX. = INTERSECTION (TYP.) MSTJ COLS', I ROUTE Z,; .07: Ven I Ile 2-2/17.5 9 S8 za i '7 AS BUILT CONTRACT NO E03494 RESIDENT ENGR.G-C Ethier DATE -30-91 �AS BUILT PLANS Contract No 47- FOR REDUCED PL4NS Date Completed ---JL-,ja - 91 C Document NO. - OAIGSAL SCALE IS M INRCIES !CU 07203 29XI -E E5Y CER71 71A7 -15.1 7-Z 11„ C--E COPY OF TIE ,0jE OCUIEN7 7AIEh LAYOUT SCALE- 1", 50' L-3 EA 10349, Z NOTE. FOR COWLETE R:GHT OF WAY,-.DATA. SEE RIGHT OF WAY MAPS AT DISTRICT OFFICE. 4 W 44 go 0 Ix T7- 4,1 R O x Caw 4,05 !�z U0 5 -4 us x V D Z IL ;7- Z c LLJ (L 0 LJ > 0 O w. L 171ST C-14-01T, I 11--rE 1 T&-AL 'P;@ICt ~w0. SETS 071 Ven C-L P. H. HSU 36606 FL--S -V':': AL JA-E .6/30/ C t FOR REDUCED PLANS 2 °"" SCALE IS N wCaCS AS BUILT PLANS • Contract Na !V 7 - A0 3 Y 9 RITE CC'n0 E ABCF DOC, vE- TAIE% Date Completed 3�-,30 - 91 Document No. OE AS BUILT CONTIRACT NO. 103494 RESIDENT ENGR. - ' -- EtWr DATE_- 4-130-91 LAYOUT •CAL[s 1*•50' L-4 CU 07203 PA 103491 C 7 t t.. t 1 x df Wi z Z OSTI COSH:♦ I ROUTE i; :.. TOTAL PP K7 OfE -T . 1S Ec W _ - 07 ' ven 1 18 22/17- 1 95 NOTEo FOR COYPLcTE RIGHT OF WAY DATA, SEE Lw i W RIGHT OF MAY YAPS AT DISTRICT L. cr OFFICE. _ �F rREn av� t>rceEER �� W U D � I O r� P, H. HSU _ a ¢ i 1 -22 -90 36602 `� J U ' PLA14S APPROVAL DATE s +6/30/9 •� LL. W i rvmL awr 2.3 r W .n UJI N W La W Q ; W tu CO - ' `p La Tx'E��+ES 7 -t j2 - JVI W - Q W S O ` - -- - R/M a, EP . Eix_ - - - -- - - -- - - -- - - -- — -- - - -- _- - m — -- - - 19 .3r = 1 S 49' 47' 12' W io 7 1 x - zW W z 7 - 30' o i4' z N U td U Q Q _ x df Wi z Z W ' a o� O Lw W _. W W cr t . F- a a W U D � I O _ a ¢ i 0 LL' � J U ' LL. W i D I AS BUILT CONTRACT NO - 103494 RESIDENT ;ENGR.Efh % @/ DATE -----___L 4 -3� i LAYOUT SCALE- 1' -50' L -5 FOR REDUCED K—S 2 _ CU J-z03 cA 103491 AS BUILT PLANS - OR "A 5 ^.•LE IS ".' - _ _ D Contract Na D7 - /D 3 5'9.5' Date Completed y-30-91 -_ F m x •-- - ------ fSkEET-.' TC;T FS D'ST 11COILWT, ROUTE it T07AL'p' O-ECT rW— ISWE 07 1 , 8 2.2/17-1 t2 f 98 W.)TEz FOR COMPLETE RIGHT OF WAY DATA, SEE RIGHT OF WAY MAPS AT DISTRICT - OFFICE_ iW—:;T Cp CML EW,.CEF P, M- HSU :-22-90 —t:-'. 'suo6 PLAkS APF'POVAL DATr 'mi 0 ,I -i =. tjj > 114' 1 S.49'47'50' F PL!--- c DIKE 0 4C OVERLAY- AS BUILT PLANS .ip ml— EXIST. --- ----------- Contract No --0-77 16,13 E'X I ST. AC Date Completed y-310-9/ AS BUILT REMOVE EXIST. Document No. CONTRACT No AC DIKE RESIDENT ENG DATE 7 W7wlwlYA: Ah. Q; .14 LAYOUT SCAL. - i ' • 5v'- L-6 o;Zr^A4 SCALE rS - - -_ -_- a 7 C, 114' 1 S.49'47'50' F LAYOUT SCAL. - i ' • 5v'- L-6 o;Zr^A4 SCALE rS - - -_ -_- a 7 C, 0 w in 5; C3 W W 40 ot a it I -CJ 1 -cr Wm CD Z UV 6 -i Li x us .4 1-101 0 Z 3! x - e1 i Z Lj cc F. 0 o LJ W W ac. > Ic 0. w LLJ 0 M a- -0 Itl COUNTY ROUTE TOT�i 25E—�Q. , To. A - yen = 118 ! 2.2/ff5 13 1 98 NUILI f- UK LLAON-L"t Kluhl tP' MAT L*A I A. MCL &Z-f- RIGHT Oc WAY MAPS AT DISTRICT 0 FF;CE. CIWV- ENGWEER 1-22-90 P. H. W,u APPROVAL t)ATE bi am X �v CA&-s auC-4o st fripc A) -51c E +x T Cjo 4r- • R EP E TIF '114, .4- N S, 49 -47-50- F. 130' *04-00 to.,007. 30' R, EP ETW x W17 & W17A RELOCATE ROADSIDE SIGN AS BUILT Cofr,RACT NO—Wff-4-2-4— L' ;� I Mier RESIDENT ENGR.G-C, 9 TLDATE AS BUILT PLANS Contract Na (2 7 - A) 3 y F1 Date Completed Document Na FOR RED`J,"ED PLANS MCU AL SCALES N wis-'Es CU 0-203 LAYOUT SCALE- 1*-50' Et, 103491 L-7 -s D NOTES FOR COMPLETE RIGHT OF WAY DATA, SEE RIGHT OF WAY MAPS AT DISTRICT OFFICE. fOO'-TRANSI-T ION -7-- 400 x-- w - ARA VE 151 Z W t75• U - - La 0 COLD PLANE 0.25' MIN. AND PI TO MATCH EXIST. GRADE TYP. z ul 0 x 61 _j zl lu > ►- 1 Lu of D Lu 0 Cc C> C J. C), D BU' .AS- C BUILT CftTRWr 40 R 0 Ef" I-" T Lzr fiver 1:5 - DAB CURVE DATA RADIUS POINT ]R T L N E !0. goo 6' `0' 20* 13 06, 277360.:196 666584.971 w .4 -E0. 114 46.43 BACK MATCH LINE STA 113-00 INTX- WCD co 114 -M. 48 AHO C = M276934.790 -j Ld E665175.700 u, fOO'-TRANSI-T ION -7-- 400 x-- w - ARA VE 151 Z W t75• U - - La 0 COLD PLANE 0.25' MIN. AND PI TO MATCH EXIST. GRADE TYP. z ul 0 x 61 _j zl lu > ►- 1 Lu of D Lu 0 Cc C> C J. C), D BU' .AS- C BUILT CftTRWr 40 R 0 Ef" I-" T Lzr fiver 1:5 - DAB CURVE DATA RADIUS POINT ]R T L N E !0. goo 6' `0' 20* 13 06, 277360.:196 666584.971 1-1 CJLJNTY I ROUTE TOTAL PRCiEET 17 1 -ion 1I8 2.2AT.5 1� 14 98 1— 11211/1, - CNIL 04GW*3ER 1-22-90 36606 1 PL•NS AvPaovat GATE a /30/9 O roF, PLA?tS ()7203 AS BUILT PLANS ..!;--AL --:-E M� --HES -- --- Contract Na 6' 7 - Z6 -'?/ 57 Date Compieted 7 50 - 91 Z­31 91 7.- '7 Document Na z LAYOUT SCALE- 1*-50' LA Ci 104 > 2 C/) 0 .73 Z 12- p C cl CD 9 06 Ah r*j I X NBC 4. STATE OF C-ALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION I PROJECT ENGINE A& PROJECT DEVELOPMENT P. H. H$ U 0 o X C? .... . .... . l< (A > i > ko to rn tD Ln It LIIII co " ID ul a, VI 0 0 IlD co co rn z ID 0 tit CALCULATED I r0liFI&VISED Ily ----I DESIGNED By cc ICHECKED BY I FIT I I DA?t REVISED 14011YA 00-LZI V'S .... . .... . (A ko to rn It LIIII ol o Lo co MATCH LINE STA 14F.00 v• �I i I� I Irk I C7 • ', ° `� D n O J U) � O P C a � 1 �.D " L Gl) I N) � me x� l; i ,I A C 2 ' N � f i 2 u Ar 1 ' l / •I I P STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPO raflft% 0 PROJECT DEVELOPMENT A w 0 (A O N W � m Ol (! O W D56 W N � p a) a ITI n J N 0 lD J m N r N N N ^1 •D 10 W r UI 10 W � co 0 2 D O N C W O O` T. C) o+. O co co _ �n N N w ID m ITI —I Ln u n a N n T P. H. HSU CALCULATED/ CC DATE REVISED BY DESIGNED BY CHECKED BY I RT I I DATE REVISED m r Q N tA LA m I / s / I , r 1 I I ! e I i 9. ,I J � ._. ,, �O u Lr w I J- Y" r R g r� D O C i fh rn I° V r 0 P. H. HSU CALCULATED/ CC DATE REVISED BY DESIGNED BY CHECKED BY I RT I I DATE REVISED m r Q N tA LA m I / s / I , r 1 I I ! e I i 9. ,I J � ._. ,, �O •.1 w R g ^ O a V v D ,+ D 7 r m a a m x CURVE DATA RADIUS-POMIT- NO. NOTE, -FOR COWLETE RIGHT OF WAY DATA, SEE RIGHT-OF WAY-UAPS AT DISTRICT i OFFICE. MT COUNTY ROUTE POST T TOTAL W. S,FFTsi 071 Von its 2.2/17.5 a ge 350', 28-05'3%* — L - EC.STvv C'M Eacl E 17"162- 279591?--903 CURVE DATA RADIUS-POMIT- NO. R T' —U-- r IN E 5 350', 28-05'3%* 8'[.i7- 17"162- 279591?--903 668533.352 6 35V 27-3-4-49- 85.90'.1 IW48" 279601.616116:6"85"-.024 c 7 300' 33.20' 37' 89.84- 174.'59" _279345.; 841 669208.083 8 600' 14-09'31" 74.51" 1 148:27' 279098.627 6694650.8312 P. I H i -22 -40 a 36606 �&NS&PPROWALDA— -,6z-A01<) CM& cc CC - ' L 072,,'! EA 103491 ASBUILT PLANS 29X Contract N7-- _LD�`��� �E a f �- 5 s. �. E �o .�.M C D Date Completed Document Na 0. L 7 (i UA CO I-0 .9w U2 8 W LLA Cr M U La x -0 8 + E. lo #At 48- 10. 39 MIN. La _j REMOVE 100 W STA. 164.M c D co 0 W Ir �yypEW�-O(D) L F- C. I k.. PP - IMTX. 4. A. S"OM IDER BACKING-TYP. z w LA > COLD PLANE 0 SEE SHEET 7E �,(- EC f- u w -Z 15' A40 PLACE OVEKAY To ACE A- C. MATC14 EXIST. COLD PLAW 0 OVERLAY To "A TCH -SA' 170.82 W 0 w. GRAD E TYP. 'ID. INTx- STA. 171 - ID - ' L 072,,'! EA 103491 ASBUILT PLANS 29X Contract N7-- _LD�`��� �E a f �- 5 s. �. E �o .�.M C D Date Completed Document Na 0. L 7 (i UA CO I-0 .9w U2 8 W LLA Cr M U La x -0 8 + E. lo #At 48- 10. 39 MIN. La _j REMOVE 100 c D �yypEW�-O(D) L F- C. I k.. RE"OYE & PLACE '0 L.F- 21 z w tn TYPE A A.C. DIKE f- u w COLD PLAW 0 OVERLAY To "A TCH M. ANO PLACE A. C. 0 w. - , EXIST. (;RADE TYP. cr 5 co 48 La Z R 61 NO 0 tJ _j > Ull w 0 -c oc o IOC WA LAYCUT SCALE- 1*- 50' - ' L 072,,'! EA 103491 ASBUILT PLANS 29X Contract N7-- _LD�`��� �E a f �- 5 s. �. E �o .�.M C D Date Completed Document Na 0. L 7 i WST CMPM I QMflE POST &MLES TOTAL PFG.XC: NOit rt. 07 V6f1 118 2.2/17.5 IS NOTEi FOR COMPLETE RIGHT OF WAY DATl.• SEE RIGHT OF MAY YAPS AT DISTRICT OE TEAED prL p ;�Epi OFF ICE -22 -90 36606 VWa APPxwovti DaTE � arA . :4. F 4r r � s Z a W e � s a O J � W zj O vl tjU W di 7 W a zl c, 0 J ; t, Uj o� W C`IO �0 LAYOUT SCALE- i' - 50• cn4 QcDV ED PLANS c _ 3 1 L -12 ORIt L SCALE 1$ N HC.ES •• __- - -__ -- ! AS BUILT PLANS i - - - - - -- Contract No. e27-- /O 3 'Si 9'1 _ _ -- - -- D • + C Date Completed / _ 3D - 9 u «DEw D�c . _ •ti 1roCvEn'V-wNE'n ^ DCCUment Na «oa u *ICn =� o ec-e�+ c� _ LL 1 7 oa L — Ms - O Ld 5�� N Ad s11 t t < ¢ STA.174.84` - SCHOOL BUS STOP PAO n.a � is \ _ 03 y O 1 APPROX. -" �' \ 4' A. C. SHOULDER BACK I NG-TYP• COLD PLANE 0. 15' Y I N. AND PLACE A. C. (SEE SLEET X -3) Dig 0 OVERLAY TO MATCH EXIST.GRADE-TYP- UG V 50' 50' S0' / ' MIN au �. c O r� EP ETN - _._ __ ___ o o n . - T Ai - -- - - I Ink m co ... - S 89'31'44• E _ S 89 * 31-1-51 E 1 N _ 1745F Zvi 112' H O Tt ' EP- ETrr Z F _. 0 i r � s Z a W e � s a O J � W zj O vl tjU W di 7 W a zl c, 0 J ; t, Uj o� W C`IO �0 LAYOUT SCALE- i' - 50• cn4 QcDV ED PLANS c _ 3 1 L -12 ORIt L SCALE 1$ N HC.ES •• __- - -__ -- ! AS BUILT PLANS i - - - - - -- Contract No. e27-- /O 3 'Si 9'1 _ _ -- - -- D • + C Date Completed / _ 3D - 9 u «DEw D�c . _ •ti 1roCvEn'V-wNE'n ^ DCCUment Na «oa u *ICn =� o ec-e�+ c� _ LL 1 7 oa L — n V c J N to i In r, D - O C I i p rD r it w ry N c w P P o 1 � -do r v �7 a 00 rn y N 4 N N N r. � r • 1 r, AIGg��� � � M {gym MATCH LINE STA 203400 Y �p • N I- STATE OF CALIFORNIA • DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION -- - -- - - -_ - - -- -- -- -- -- PROJECT ENGINEER CALCULATED/ DESIGNED BY CC DATE REVISED BY. ;z ra*tma PROJECT DEVELOPMENT P. H. i CHECKED BY FIT DATE REVISED MATCH LINE STA 188400 I; 15 m fn �LD -n T' • i s mI im a 0 n• ;p r v) x i • T I ti V -x LA a rr-/ U U n O N O n C 00 f�1 3 C� o• ,� m z D z C � P CL N, r . ............ m z } 1 K I j A. 1" tA C r•, • i i 1 F I r co n V c J N to i In r, D - O C I i p rD r it w ry N c w P P o 1 � -do r v �7 a 00 rn y N 4 N N N r. � r • 1 r, AIGg��� � � M {gym MATCH LINE STA 203400 Y �p .N o• n I�o, p w o 10 >V/ n N c ^C p (1 T 3 z W z 1 C c� r cn I I 5 Ilc E I' f %„ r . III ill i X M M X STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION PROJECT ENGINEER CALCULATED/ DATE - - -- DESIGNED BY CC REVISED BY A* M&MV PROJECT DEVELOPMENT P. H. HSU CHECKED BY FIT DATE REVISED MATCH LINE STA 203.00 Y v - m m rte, I w " w m i I r I f , r ti w co Y, � I r I MATCH LINE STA 2184 Q m m 4 16 r i f�1 T <t yI T LA). i v m N � r t0 P r 0 O � CC m y C� N F� \ Z N O'rri m •� �� r i t � �Icl = r� N n r� r a - 0 I• �/I O r r. r A MATCH LINE STA 2184 Q m m 4 16 r i f�1 T <t yI T LA). i v m N � r t0 P r 0 O � CC m y C� N F� \ Z N O'rri m •� �� r i RE STATE OF CALIFORNIA . -DEPARTMENT OF TRAWOF 4QV6lMnffl PROJECT DEVELOPMENT j o n > o C) 3 P Q, r f- f•A0jECT 9NWNt9R CALCULATED/ CC DATE DESIGNED BY REVIS P. H. HSU CHECKED BY RT DATE REVISED MATCH LINE STA 218400 A 00 -m 2 1 v, � l e i u � � �' 2 p Ili Z 1 X . ... ....... . .... WALNUT / i I I ill 1. 4.,k 1 , i j 11 / q /,- /; LA # J Co lI 7.' L tA MATCH LINE STA 233#00 I 4 PATE -6F— CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT .9F WANSPORTATION Pitoitc-r aNcoact.-711DE �Y�E REVISED 5 P. H. HS-U CH Y RT DATE REVISED ECT DEVELOPMENT CHECKED By 4— BY mgvCn LINE STA 233.00 .... .... . 4 Z9'9L*SV.Z id $ d .... ... . ...... . V I- , 0 C 4 to JJ MATCH LINE STA 246#00 0 ol IT ro V� :4 V Ln tA cl CALCULATE D/ CC D mgvCn LINE STA 233.00 .... .... . 4 Z9'9L*SV.Z id $ d .... ... . ...... . V I- , 0 C 4 to JJ MATCH LINE STA 246#00 0 ol IT ro V� :4 V Ln tA cl FEE CN CJ 11 > CD n o 3 00 QC Ci cf) 7! A A OF TRANSPORTATION PROJECT DX)*Wtft CALCULATED/ STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT cc JDATE . ....... by REVISED BY A& PROJECT DEVELOPMENT P.H.HSU CHECKED BY At DATE REVISED T MATCH LINE STA 248o00 1-1 39 14 rn rm of V LA LA hl ,' � � (� I . 1 � µ.ax ... ..... ..... . ... .... t co Cb C? 0 r CJ MATCH LINE STA 263400 co c_— 0 rD -04 2 39 14 rn rm of V LA LA hl ,' � � (� I . 1 � µ.ax ... ..... ..... . ... .... t co Cb C? 0 r CJ MATCH LINE STA 263400 co rD 39 14 rn rm of V LA LA hl ,' � � (� I . 1 � µ.ax ... ..... ..... . ... .... t co Cb C? 0 r CJ MATCH LINE STA 263400 co 41. 0 V, 6,11 j L, ...... .... ui iv ........... 4- STATE OF CALIFORNIA V! DEPARTMENT or TRANIFORRAMN, 010"m SWIM "i t AD i2V P. H. -Hsu 69VW PROJECT DEVELOPMENT ............... . . . . . . . . . MATCH UNICAW > 'r � l4e f N. 51 rd ilk, ........... CENTER SC 001. AD �. / �, .f .NS 1 YA l,4�i y ��! wn. �Y ,k,[. ' Y.1:; ,.r a.: A 41 cn .0 cl) z c: r (j l m D l4e f N. 51 rd ilk, ........... CENTER SC 001. AD �. / �, .f .NS 1 YA l,4�i y ��! wn. �Y ,k,[. ' Y.1:; ,.r a.: A 41 cn .0 cl) z c: r r H F�- R� CMnY fr� da 73� t'l \ f 11n � �kr r +Y}4 '1 stir A-4 d1LM' f i 5 , £ STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION' rRoJECT [N9M 0 r CALUP ATE CC AT kvl,iEDOY _. _ OW . i P1-\O,IFC T DEVELOPMENT P. H. HSU CMECKED BY `' FIT DATBkBVISM. 2 !. d MATCH LINE STA 270000 rys "S yy :fit a t` F_p 41 1 I = e tJ•J ° x .�.. "t 4eh , ��t 1 vir "X...`j::l � r 4 � � �� � Y � Vr��tA£££ t �y ti <�rb, � ♦ 'y. ��e . r kf:' r. t (li�,X� ;, r KS,.rs.. x5�, �rl f +'' ``- �•��```,� (t yy I !��n �,l � , JR t '�" bid.. " }rljt .• �33 ,�'!�(���"t ��t �s1. ", I� r ����,R�+y ,.. - '�,, V I .� .�ix} ��y fKE,: Sb �,,.J t'� lc' ` 2. �• *7y -X S .. II 'W��� 1K 'y , N nh s4• . YYii'' ,.. 5. ,r J1s P al 'rte a: • /.•; l6�h'= F ^.{at� h , :� »' •� � � 4.iS`. .+� .. -tk.r �4�`y tq�� �/ r�r` 'bar. i � ���"7 i` � � ,ES'� fit„ rK���1:�a``3 a�ltd�f } •�• .AP ; ,h'b r ; c }U� 1 C R N .... _. U.I.. N _w ;. •x �^t9_v f�� d, '[ !. r� ,{ Y 11 n 0 �k'� +�-j�1 'iy"P�i'..}�� rt` 9 _ �' �� �'t t' l L �,� Y� •,N � �., �_ •1 $MA 40240 tii ♦ � ' Y, +r�, ' }� '°� �Y� �r ��'' r 2 � 1 ✓R �• • 1 �. e ',Y i i rl. ().j ii 1 Y IN .4p .4� V4, 8fATFOF -CALjF6­R­Ntk--.- -DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION PROACT KNO*Ktlt CALCL DEVELOPMENT P, H. HSU COCO _MATCH-LINK,S?4 / �� . Mfr a � � ' 4, q aw 44 I \" + m A., 5 N II I ti ........... Ii fg X1. / �� . Mfr a � � ' 4, q aw 44 I \" + m A., 5 N ti ........... / �� . Mfr a � � ' 4, q aw 44 I \" + m A., 5 N ;I, ii tl STATE --d—F--CALIFOA-flk • —DEPARTIENT OF TRA—NSPO' PROJECT DEVELOPMENT c. P. H. Hsu ' 4 MATCH LINE STA 301* 60 \,uI 4-ie Ww rfi p "S A STATE --d—F--CALIFOA-flk • —DEPARTIENT OF TRA—NSPO' PROJECT DEVELOPMENT c. P. H. Hsu ' 4 MATCH LINE STA 301* 60 \,uI Ww rfi "S A STATE --d—F--CALIFOA-flk • —DEPARTIENT OF TRA—NSPO' PROJECT DEVELOPMENT c. P. H. Hsu ' 4 MATCH LINE STA 301* 60 \,uI m C-) U) z � CD rn Ww rfi If 16 m C-) U) z � CD rn IA vj WK, A orl U& �.� { ��. ' �f.,. it 1 �^, m� � i0� �.' 1/ Yr MATCH L I Ng St.ii Ili Ww IA vj WK, A orl U& �.� { ��. ' �f.,. it 1 �^, m� � i0� �.' 1/ Yr MATCH L I Ng St.ii Ili O•. STATE OF 55011 K AD 6d/ iiT. n R R °o D cD o a U T iQ C o. 14QI CD 7 V Dv r- .L9 W .gym t � 1 Uyn N, y4m lm •� m�i ^'Iim �2rw r� g# �m 0 N (� n J� N 'o n N o W imrAn i ACn l yP I AAnorvn l w nvn rnvvc.. , ¢nwnecw �,.v�w l wr CC 1 ° REVISED BY - DESIGNED BY PROJECT DEVELOPMENT P. H. HSU I CHECKED BY I RT DATE REVISED MATCH LINE STA 322.00 I � : N I 4 y x �) ' .� era �', _ f >�+ +, � ••� O/U yt. n 'YPa i . K, >ag?~ s 4., I �.I '9 ry , I • \\ ,t �� ' ,. .r ;* .:�i t a ��. tip, � t, i�* .�{ • -. � �, , `' n. `�''d� �+ $''' ��," , ° }+v N •. T $ rod i s p a wr, t ,tIII�a il ii j . £ 9t3 k. �' •}i,.. ' I., I �I I 'r" ,` y I� is,•Y, • �S.i q ��7Fak t1�,a; , �� ' .. ... ,i. ", \ ' b 1 �.A 1 a �•' 777,- Al Alt iL MATCH LINE STA 337.00 N n T y g rn a to , •o O a 10 I � : N I 4 y x �) ' .� era �', _ f >�+ +, � ••� O/U yt. n 'YPa i . K, >ag?~ s 4., I �.I '9 ry , I • \\ ,t �� ' ,. .r ;* .:�i t a ��. tip, � t, i�* .�{ • -. � �, , `' n. `�''d� �+ $''' ��," , ° }+v N •. T $ rod i s p a wr, t ,tIII�a il ii j . £ 9t3 k. �' •}i,.. ' I., I �I I 'r" ,` y I� is,•Y, • �S.i q ��7Fak t1�,a; , �� ' .. ... ,i. ", \ ' b 1 �.A 1 a �•' 777,- Al Alt iL MATCH LINE STA 337.00 WE 00, 0 iD C/) 3 c) 03 -%- Q cz P CL > 00 - ar rr•a 7" Wi, r 9 SY 1,�1 V •cq STATE OF CALIFORNIA • DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORT TIN I obotojec? INGINgam ICALCULATED/ OT ,, -- JDATE 1 REVISED 0Y I I P*HoHSU A& PROJECT DEVELOPMENT CHECKED ISY RT V,4 4 MATCH LINE STA 337+00 MAY r o � t. � a T ..... .. ... .... lu, 7., Z" W!, A A o-1 ia , 4 11 4 2 0 q, P ic Sam- $a cp r r AGOEN il)." 4 LA 0 2 Its N L4 MATCH LINE STA 352*00 Yt NOTE- FOR CC UY DATA. SEE .-WLETE RfLoff OF�L RIGHT Of WAY YAPS AT DISTRICT OFFICE- Z 0- o of 0 25 of AS BUILT CONTRACT NO R E: LAYOUT • ESIDIENT EXGRAL� y _ - �Ehierr 10 SCALE- 1'-50, 4, LDAY 4-3 L-24 FOR REDUCED PLANS 1 AS BUILT PLANS 2 3 ICU 07203 1101C�IL SCALE 15 .1 C'�CMCS Contract Na • Date Completed 3�- Je3 - 9 I.ERIS.CE�I--TT.,S.$a-IIE'No,rCUR&TECCAOc--E�BC — ; A Document No. X: Ot DCST WUTE TOTAL FR—CC` S-1EETS 3-- 071 ven I Ila 1 2- 2/17.5 11 30 98 R/W-N, - m' > N EP EW 1\ if- P. H- 1-22-90 36 PLANS LpsaOVAL DATE W ifs cra 4A o-4 tic, Z Vhf Z 3-� lain d3 -i ETW./ to a u -jrA A,— Ll Z 0- o of 0 25 of AS BUILT CONTRACT NO R E: LAYOUT • ESIDIENT EXGRAL� y _ - �Ehierr 10 SCALE- 1'-50, 4, LDAY 4-3 L-24 FOR REDUCED PLANS 1 AS BUILT PLANS 2 3 ICU 07203 1101C�IL SCALE 15 .1 C'�CMCS Contract Na • Date Completed 3�- Je3 - 9 I.ERIS.CE�I--TT.,S.$a-IIE'No,rCUR&TECCAOc--E�BC — ; A Document No. X: Ot DCST WUTE TOTAL FR—CC` S-1EETS 3-- 071 ven I Ila 1 2- 2/17.5 11 30 98 R/W-N, - N EP EW 1\ if- P. H- 1-22-90 36 PLANS LpsaOVAL DATE 6/ ifs cra 4A Z Vhf Z -i ETW./ B, u A,— Ll I.- M ASP-■&-T SWMk-DG4a-,' C� C> iiw - 360*00 1W Ae Z 120- ISO' �77 at Z 0- o of 0 25 of AS BUILT CONTRACT NO R E: LAYOUT • ESIDIENT EXGRAL� y _ - �Ehierr 10 SCALE- 1'-50, 4, LDAY 4-3 L-24 FOR REDUCED PLANS 1 AS BUILT PLANS 2 3 ICU 07203 1101C�IL SCALE 15 .1 C'�CMCS Contract Na • Date Completed 3�- Je3 - 9 I.ERIS.CE�I--TT.,S.$a-IIE'No,rCUR&TECCAOc--E�BC — ; A Document No. X: Ot DCST WUTE TOTAL FR—CC` S-1EETS 3-- 071 ven I Ila 1 2- 2/17.5 11 30 98 PEG-f-Pa CM ENCM4EEP P. H- 1-22-90 36 PLANS LpsaOVAL DATE 6/ ifs cra B, A,— ASP-■&-T SWMk-DG4a-,' C� C> iiw - 360*00 Ae 120- ISO' �77 at Z 0- o of 0 25 of AS BUILT CONTRACT NO R E: LAYOUT • ESIDIENT EXGRAL� y _ - �Ehierr 10 SCALE- 1'-50, 4, LDAY 4-3 L-24 FOR REDUCED PLANS 1 AS BUILT PLANS 2 3 ICU 07203 1101C�IL SCALE 15 .1 C'�CMCS Contract Na • Date Completed 3�- Je3 - 9 I.ERIS.CE�I--TT.,S.$a-IIE'No,rCUR&TECCAOc--E�BC — ; A Document No. X: Ot c; • 00 • ,06 Sim Wt� m 00! I mf O O STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION PROJECT ENGINEER CALCULATED 1 I r I ATE _ DESIGNED BY�C I I REVISED BY 'W PROJECT DEVELOPMENT P. H. HSU CHECKED BYRT DATE REVISED - MA*4 LINE STA 36T-00 rn I LA n > 01 4, d- m rn > 0. cn c Ad + 13 fn m 4 Ln 00 2 C C.) 0 r L C" C) .4 JP-D' -------- ....... Jo W 4i --2= • MATCH LINE STA 382#00 CD NOTES FOR COMPLETE RIGHT OF WAY DATA. SEE RIGHT OF WAY MAPS AT DISTRICT OFFICE. ------- 3e?-. TO-TALTPPOACT wo. SI-EE- TUT&- S Von lie 2.2/17.5 321 98 Town cftL Ds2WEW-1 - H. 14SU 1-22-90 — 36 LNS APPROVAL DATE --4 , J \5/30/ 9 38w $� ld vp 63 5: ta W OX Id > ad M, 3M� x 3M3 ix COLD PLANE 0.15' YIN. AND PLACE A. C. X 3622 - 0 OVERLAY TO MATCH EXIST. GRADE TYP &a 3W-5 to SM7 Ulm 5 z aWC x I . — 1,;� COLD PLANE 0.15- WIN. AND PLACE A.C. OVERLAY TO WATCH EXIST. GRADE TYP 10, R/w EP-\ ETW 40 RatiTr I -kA,- sy x--- EP-"ETW 60, 300 X 4 81- 2E 0 Ls- APPROX. Q INTX. Q i I-- co Z Lj C3. > a- W W ;" zi Lj (L cl 0 O tr 7 Lu LAYOUT SCALE- 1''50' L-26 FOR FtEDuCEO PLANS c 2 ou 07203 r�A 103-9 DRIGNAL SCALE fS w 04CHES AS BUILT PLANS -26- - i I e Contract N a - 0 7- - AQ 3 V '0 Date Completed 91 yv 6 STATE OF CALIFORNIA - DEPARI'MENT OF THANSP IQ PROJECT DEVELOPMENT >w 0 m 2 CD 3 E3 D U 3 Z (D _0 > z c/) soy jm to 9 Mn A ern ID PQ 0 c t�e L Wl iT. 1p n. ;C? ENGINEER CALCULATED/ CC ptgySgo by P. H. HSU DESIGNED By rATEj CHECKED By FIT OA+t Ftz-vism MATCH LINE STA 397400 rn rm 11 li k N 12 1t2 IAI t�e I m II MATCH LINE STA 412 �X A@2� L Wl 1p I m II MATCH LINE STA 412 �X A@2� L 1p I m II MATCH LINE STA 412 �X A@2� 0• 0• con (j) z cl) z C G P 11 - iI i •, c il:�„ V .� STATE- OF CAD 40, I R_ NIA ----D.-EPARTVEPT OF TRANSPORTATION PROJECT DEVELOPMENT -0 X i co c co OJECT ENGINEER CALCULATED/ cc DESIGNED BY C LCL" L [DE le't S' S P. H. HSU CMCCIIEI CHECKED BY I RT Ij W+06 Id N co OJECT ENGINEER CALCULATED/ cc DESIGNED BY C LCL" L [DE le't S' S P. H. HSU CMCCIIEI CHECKED BY I RT Ij W+06 Id N J 0 w �4 N% NORTH,ST. x REVISED 13Y DATE REVISED 412400 P/ 'A ..... .. .... . ...... .... ... .. ..... ... .... .. . . ......... .. . ........ .. .. .. ....•.• ...... ... BRA DL T RD '4 p T m 10 fm Ij k; -4 27#00 Am jR IH 06; 9 w 0 00— cn 3 c) E3 0 a Z (D z W lI iLn 16r STATE OF CALIFORNIA _• DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION I PROJECT EN 4b. av6tvw PROJECT DEVELOPMENT P. H. HSU I!% CD 0 r r- > C) O CALCULATED/ ATE CC DESIGNED BY REVISED BY CHECKED BY DATE REVISED 427+00 • Ilii.11 ...... . ... .... ..... .. . ..... . .... . ............ . ... .. .. ...... .... ... .. . .... .... .... ........ ... .......... . . .. . ...... UL \ 1 11' I ARM C) HIM LA #00 MAT H L I C O 777 I!% CD 0 r r- > C) O CALCULATED/ ATE CC DESIGNED BY REVISED BY CHECKED BY DATE REVISED 427+00 • Ilii.11 ...... . ... .... ..... .. . ..... . .... . ............ . ... .. .. ...... .... ... .. . .... .... .... ........ ... .......... . . .. . ...... UL \ 1 11' I ARM C) HIM LA #00 MAT H L I 777 :, I, • yI \ 1 I!% CD 0 r r- > C) O CALCULATED/ ATE CC DESIGNED BY REVISED BY CHECKED BY DATE REVISED 427+00 • Ilii.11 ...... . ... .... ..... .. . ..... . .... . ............ . ... .. .. ...... .... ... .. . .... .... .... ........ ... .......... . . .. . ...... UL \ 1 11' I ARM C) HIM LA #00 x. I x X-- M 3j ll- z 0 ILI ii F- W 0 tl Vi I AS BUILT CONTRACT NO /01349• RESIDENT ENGR.G-C, EMig DATE— 4-30-91 LAYOUT SCALE, I'- 5C' L - 30 rrw Rmurvn P1 ANS 4� 1 2 3 (>RjG"AL SCALE tS W MOCHES AS BUILT PLANS • 1 Contract Na 07- /,0'`/ -91 I Date Completed V .3.0 — 1 2-C) - CGLWT� _ osrj fh-,L —ES IOTA' tS*f SHEETS NOTE, FOR COUPLE -it RIGHT OF WAY DATA, SEA` 071 V,. 1.18 2.2117.5 98 36 RIGHT OF WAY MAPS AT DISTRICT OFFICE. PcGrEPM Cr.L U4GNEF? - -22-90 H HSU PLA%S Xvvr 36606 -/30/9 r�A CW OW C N > u cc WID I.- aw x M 3j ll- z 0 ILI ii F- W 0 tl Vi I AS BUILT CONTRACT NO /01349• RESIDENT ENGR.G-C, EMig DATE— 4-30-91 LAYOUT SCALE, I'- 5C' L - 30 rrw Rmurvn P1 ANS 4� 1 2 3 (>RjG"AL SCALE tS W MOCHES AS BUILT PLANS • 1 Contract Na 07- /,0'`/ -91 I Date Completed V .3.0 — 1 2-C) T Iff-Eil EETJ TOTAL AL DIST COUNTY ROUTE POS �C_ No OT P"a SP.EETS j 37L OT Van ST 98 NOTES FOR COMPLETE R I GHT OF-'WAY OAT&, SEE rm RIGHT OF WUAY AT DISTRICT OFFICE.' 7 CrM EKSWER !; P. H. HSLJ x -22-90 -1 m, 6606 S PLMISAPPMVAL DATE • .6.130,f OF 3 ZILZ la on go 5: Ad ad cc 1 0 3", dc�,3-� E ft C- x w C3, tc 10(y f STA. 47 90, Ix t.v- APPROX. J/ f 0 7�7 11 mm go in R/W UV JV) yam// U0 90 LES 4 00 ETV161- --- x EP 41 300' R/W N 001-0 PLANE 0. 15'M IN. AND PLACE A.C. z 3w xw� 3� 3� OVERLAY TO MATCH EXIST. GRADE TYP Fm LIMIT OF 0.651 A.C. OVERLAY Z 0 ml W Lu a $p ul 0 i -C Ji of cc CURVE DATA RADIUS POINT NO. I R I A I T L == N I E ' ... 9 2000'l 10- A I • 15 187.07' 373.06'1 777425.169 1 699723.403 4lo LAYOUT CALE- 1• -50• L-31 FOR ;tEOCZ�ED PLA.�S 0 1 1 3 C 07203 EA 103491 AS BUILT PLANS C Contract Na el 7 - ZO 3 Y57 I A SOLE IS IN 11CIES '3 ��, - -3R Z­0, al T Date Completed 15/- 56 - 9/ r Y f O t W > N m j W W � N y� > H W < K Q v r V � K Wm Y m I- <W O 7 Z Y us O JN W < W S uc u Z a O Z F•• il!l H f 6 d o C d a CI vi o) W =1 <� W °; 0 1c a z' al W_ J V O W t' i r0.. M- OE_12— I-M ].N, DISTI CDtxrr 1 ROUTE TCii� aWp,IECT I +.p. ivE 07 1 Ven 118 2_ 2/ 17.5 38 I 98 G am ENc.nEER j �\ H- HSU -22 -90 36605 ALA \S L- Pop \'•4 C,I�E�• /30/92/ .: 10 BACK PT 484'00- £0- ' S� - l6 O"Ar, �i86 N 2-19.324 659 E -101.118.029 _ E :c - �, 1v- N 80- • 26- APPROXr- INTX - 34' . '`� CURVE --DATA COLD PLANE O 15'. 41 N =, A ND PLACE A-d = -2 ' R s OVERLAY. TO WATCH'- `GRADE - {TIPS ; ": T OZ N ,EXIST. 9 2000" 10-41'15- 187.07' 373.06 Q 699723.403 3-" ; { - - t y' r 21'09'53' 373.65' 738.79' 281294.748 700'73.320 -"EP f 7tr` o N _ f $ g -__S Ep ��gS'gl• �_- = 216. ET M R/w ( 48 - - s - — - - - - - a 300, - S7 A 4 r0.. M- OE_12— I-M ].N, DISTI CDtxrr 1 ROUTE TCii� aWp,IECT I +.p. ivE 07 1 Ven 118 2_ 2/ 17.5 38 I 98 G am ENc.nEER j �\ H- HSU -22 -90 36605 ALA \S L- Pop \'•4 C,I�E�• /30/92/ .: 10 BACK PT 484'00- £0- ' S� - l6 O"Ar, �i86 N 2-19.324 659 E -101.118.029 _ E :c - �, 1v- N 80- • 26- APPROXr- INTX - 34' . '`� _ -rc A T No REO DEW ENpR. pAi _ E CURVE --DATA RADIUS POINT = -2 ,NO. R i A T L N E 9 2000" 10-41'15- 187.07' 373.06 277425.169 699723.403 10 2000' 21'09'53' 373.65' 738.79' 281294.748 700'73.320 _ -rc A T No REO DEW ENpR. pAi _ E t I ' 1 -32 103491 D _ - LAYOUT SCALE- 1'-50' - SASA BUILT PLANS C I Contract Nn CCU - /D -� ��� A Date Completed 401 2/ 1 Y- Document No. t, FOR REDUCED PLANS O 1 owcNAL SCALE IS IN INCHES 1 I 2 3 1 1 Cu 07203 EA C v E � OE s c , EAETCE>T+"T,++ll.'s3+ MUD +vD +wU°l'ECD:"pr THE ISO:FDDCJ fk-T..EN i Uh DERWTJAECT0I .ANDCIM'- •KJ_7%TH$JTC IN S+CWYE�TC C UF0"`I .W,HDR:2/��gr:9r �w£D:RF.-PRC TR+vSN¢' +1Ww y. z - t I ' 1 -32 103491 D V 1� { O •. $ STATE OF CALIF 04 o ° o D� 2 a CD 3 B 0�7 Z P Q �� b D cn i I R �I x1i '1! n � n 4 'DA A kv IT P, iP 8. t �M 2m S y i x f 3� x PROJECT DEVELOPMENT P. H. HSU O N u ;n r. Yi�t�M I1�1~Yjfk +lS �g.t�h Ih qi. I O N O a r O � N f1 'r mD O r ly W r� ;n �y�p~x Yi�t�M I1�1~Yjfk +lS �g.t�h ::i O '' , It a' �4 i m rn r' 1 �I ,I 1 I � Y I N x CALCULATED/ CC DATE REVISED BY DESIGNED BY _ CHECKED BY RT DATE REVISED LL �y�p~x Yi�t�M I1�1~Yjfk +lS �g.t�h ::i O '' , It m �4 i m N x CALCULATED/ CC DATE REVISED BY DESIGNED BY _ CHECKED BY RT DATE REVISED LL .r L I II I I I N I'I II /I I YI II I I .. 1 • ~,....,., ., M! ti I N1 r` I' • w,/ I n 0 0 S CAI T T 0 �z - �D r �� W ~ MATCH L I NE STA. 504.50 • I' ^' 00 �1 • M� � SMO i ° ■ O '' , It m i m rfi 1 I IA l J „ .r L I II I I I N I'I II /I I YI II I I .. 1 • ~,....,., ., M! ti I N1 r` I' • w,/ I n 0 0 S CAI T T 0 �z - �D r �� W ~ MATCH L I NE STA. 504.50 • I' ^' 00 �1 • M� � SMO x STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION PROJECT ENGINEER CALCULATED/ EICUl DESIGNED REVISED BY - k7 PROJECT DEVELOPMENT P. H. HSU CHECKED BY �T I JDATE REVISED �-H-�--R::P 0 > 3 Z 00 :3 co p c > Z cl) FA rI uRn Dili I! Pia T z, 1. ! '* 0 0 fill 0 W oc 0 > 3 Z 00 :3 co p c > Z cl) FA rI uRn Dili I! Pia T z, 1. ! '* 0 0 fill 0 W I ml MATCH LINE STA. 519450 LA CUMSPE RD LA 2 211 1 T A ob I ml MATCH LINE STA. 519450 AN I STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - - -- -- - Lam' ra*%VW PROJECT DEVELOPMENT R 0.• I o n VV ^ j V 0) o ° p C n {V I� z � cn D• K) to Kt 1 In ma � L . N N 1 ) � RI O C n CALCULATED/ OESIGNED BY �• „a In c a a Cn rrn n I.— PROJECT ENOINEER P. H. HSU MATCH w x n 1 '" T �' • \ \ \\ `\ 1 \ 111 1� � 1 ! k M RI O C n CALCULATED/ OESIGNED BY �• DATE REVISED BY ,-, ti CHECKED BY RT r� DATE REVISED r 6 19•5 g 1 I •C I' II c I 1 w Is „a In c a a Cn rrn n I.— PROJECT ENOINEER P. H. HSU MATCH w x n 1 '" T �' • \ \ \\ `\ 1 \ 111 1� � 1 ! k A M RI O C jllli�il CALCULATED/ OESIGNED BY C DATE REVISED BY CHECKED BY RT I� DATE REVISED A M CALCULATED/ OESIGNED BY C DATE REVISED BY CHECKED BY RT DATE REVISED STA. 6 19•5 g 1 I ZA H t l .'.A y, t�... •� ' {r' � y,w ,..,.,11;x. 1 1 5 N. hf J� '' 41 . -... p � �pNYO� RD• '.. / I1 C) NJ h / s 1. 4 g -N- 4: 11 042 ci 0 W 39 jai u (L -I z • Darl COUNry T I ROUTE I TCT- POS P — 071 V.. 1 118 i 2-2/17.5 RE- cm-t- Dw5mEER 1-22-90 P'LkhS APPROVAL DATE NOTE, XOR COMPLETE RIGHT OF WAY DATA, SEE RIGHT OF WAY.MAPS AT DISTRICT. OFFICE. qr N- =Z-: In WZA 13" KLXALt-'l IkS idc. -A ZZ.: 5; N 60'04'2W.- E T12• . 30- 535tM 4d w x T tA' 130' =-7777��17777� 1S cc 042 ci 0 W 39 jai u (L -I z As. N 3.2 go CWL • Darl COUNry T I ROUTE I TCT- POS P — 071 V.. 1 118 i 2-2/17.5 RE- cm-t- Dw5mEER 1-22-90 P'LkhS APPROVAL DATE As. N 3.2 go CWL uj O Ix O Wi AS BUILT PLANS Contract NcL i Date Completed ,C,p P--:)Ly-ED PLANS -'?G*tAL SCALE -S !N NC—S x� t co;;moo slKrl*-4--wl - -z LAYOUT SCA-E. Ll qr =Z-: In 13" KLXALt-'l IkS idc. ZZ.: N 60'04'2W.- E T12• . 30- 535tM T tA' 130' =-7777��17777� 1S uj O Ix O Wi AS BUILT PLANS Contract NcL i Date Completed ,C,p P--:)Ly-ED PLANS -'?G*tAL SCALE -S !N NC—S x� t co;;moo slKrl*-4--wl - -z LAYOUT SCA-E. C;. I STATE OF CALIF 11� IT n• ° °o A R Cn 3 n N c (D a Z Q Q � Y V D z �W :I L C. ar� n�- l 1'm 111 ".•i �F III 4 J I I O� r cS > m rC•j N n ► r m � A r n M x x „ DEPARTOFENT OF TRANSPORTATION PROJECT ENGINEER CALCULATED/ DATE DESIGNED BY I CC REVISED Br PROJECT DEVELOPMENT P. H. HSU 1 CHECKED BY I RT I JDATEREVISED n m c )> M Z CD z Z G. O O GI 0 J N O N O s m D -C U Ci m O cv W ID r W v MATCH 1 INE STA. 549•50 • I rn I i l 1 ( II 2•�j, �� :0 �1 .•vj 611 I � � e s m I, �%/ � ! �� IIII Illi,l I� � � I .n �? wlq; " �Y J ` �,y >> �• ` 7D I '�I ' I' I� li I � � i d�x•'FZ ,,,r ` y �. ,.• i ,!III I (N� I I ( = I soco 4 ...,. I I• "I , "'lllil i II ., ' ,1 '� II'' ,� •'I.1 �I�I i 1 I ! II III iI I' ,I I,I'.III III i I/ I % I� i l l i� i�Vl Illi 1 1 I i IIA I • � ff i I �r 1 11 I I I I I NIIIIII�II M II l' I , �I�� I �F II,1II I��II 1�� d c �i 1111 a i lu7 'll ; 1+1111 I I A Iltlill' Ij I A 1 � , I I ;,I III�II ii_I1 ` ;r In► I Ili i I I I I IIII I i , r " i i I!IIj(11 I II'jl I, I S I`1 0 IN I IIII„ r III) 111 (I -4 III lli II 1 i" ✓ si J '' N j yr .fir ' r "W I I , 1, n \ 9A■[r • a�4' W dA 0• 00 Q° w o D Cn 3 z co zs C Qa q. r zn V/ �11 li r1�rp:. .e I a t n , EEom 4 Dii . o� �8a A Y CR R T N=1 �I x in in 70 N u 0.� w x AD Mid PROJECT DEVELOPMENT P. H. HSU O w n r N in r' r I � c m > I l J . U' _C r44� 0 O .. ' N 0 4 w v �y I > 0.� w x AD Mid PROJECT DEVELOPMENT P. H. HSU O w n r N in r' r fm .; Z A CC' m > -4 -4 `w l - c z = U' _C r44� O .. J. k 4 � • v �y 1 ,ti 41 1 �< > A $Ail 'LM O V1 it � � I I DE510 ED BYE CC' ATE REGISED BY``'.jZy l CHECKED BY RT DATE REVISED •; .. J. k I. " LN ,ti MpUREE�t yI'I r y �ra i I I /r 1 1 �< > A $Ail 'LM O V1 it � � I I i t 411tl l �....r .. I. " LN ,ti MpUREE�t `• .. olK�. T 4 `�. y� �� Y y � r w O• � 4 > .r i � I o IA i t 411tl I � _ �, it `I� y\ t �� 1, 1 I •: 1'f' _ N < rn c CD c559 „ r0 9 .91 " LN ,ti MpUREE�t `• .. olK�. T 4 `�. y� �� Y y � r w O• � 4 I � _ �, it `I� y\ t �� 1, 1 I •: 1'f' _ N < rn c CD c559 „ r0 9 14 LM 0* a) 0 9 C) @ CD 0 3 Z c CD cl. �z "i U 1110 00 X( my Ovm Ong ,)I T- C, c. rrt M STATE OF CALIFORNIA _DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION PROJECT DEVELOPMENT 10JECT ENOINEER ICALCULATED/ 1CC I DATE I REVISED BY DESIGNED BY P. H. HSU ----I 1 CHECKED BY FIT DATE REVISED MATCU 1A 5454*60 41' Val, -4 rn (A )w rn �j I: III vi LIM z 9 C) --WATCH LINE STA. 579-50 "o ;0 A C)• STATE OF CALII Ik AD ral6ww 0• > (j) @ 0 a CO ti 3 Z p ID Cl. Ii Sr T n I K DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION PROJtCT tNam e; PROJECT DEVELOPMENT P. H. HSU MATCH L I LOM7, CANYON CREEK - I i it li i I �' I, � � J', I I.� I I �fl IIj" Flo -Ain $6 0 yr Fly K DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION PROJtCT tNam e; PROJECT DEVELOPMENT P. H. HSU MATCH L I LOM7, CANYON CREEK - I i it li i I �' I, � � J', I I.� I I �fl IIj" Flo -Ain $6 IIIJ � �� jl j /� .a:I h A CALCULATED / C PATE C. DESIGNED BY CHECKED BY FITI I DATE Ri6hH07: NE SM 579-50 j 1'It � t � �l V M -n IX 10' Z. . . ..... ... Ig 0 3vl. "Ar, 17 21 A IIIALCOM CA A 01 0 tA ic 4 0 yr tD IIIJ � �� jl j /� .a:I h A CALCULATED / C PATE C. DESIGNED BY CHECKED BY FITI I DATE Ri6hH07: NE SM 579-50 j 1'It � t � �l V M -n IX 10' Z. . . ..... ... Ig 0 3vl. "Ar, 17 21 A IIIALCOM CA A 01 0 tA ic 4 1�s oo� STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT Of TRANSPORTATION CZA&M-W PROJECT DEVELOPMENT CD UJ Z Q > Z c/) o Qm O UP FT 0• I' Pil OF', A L 6i It j"L ?,*4 Sa 1{• \\ `I is i I III i it it ro li rt Ic 'k Y' POST 5 SrEET' MT COLWY I ROUTE I TOTC PROJE'T v0. 07 V_ 1 18 22/17.5 ` 147 r NOTES FOR COMPLETE RIGHT OF WAY DATA. SEE r r RIGHT OF MAY YAPS AT DISTRICT 1�3 OFFICE. ` v 36[ — TEFtED Uw F,.c.EOt -22 -90 P. H. HSU i� SIT, i Puws .PTwov.: o&TE ,S ' c-6/301 am Zn- Ad Ad J �... ;_. 7.. ,.. ... , . ,.,� j �-,�` »fir � • a�" - : t �� 4�7,AWi ioK, i, Iwo L � M1 W m p c E''p a <� "°`.. fir...,• - l - +,. s 4. WOO M 62&00 f , l� l •tti - y 4' T- 1 i= EP ETw -' s 4;; ; - - -- - - -- - - - - -- -- - _ -- M- so - t >: :%3 e. J C = o W i M L rpw D 1 CURVE - DATA -. - -- RADIUS -POINT NO. R -T - L N . - E If 1800 5'22'11 84.41' 168.64' - 283411.298 714028.300 -Ev. 31061 AS BUILT PLATS 11 _ C i Contract No. /o 3 V 911 Date Completed -I,-,3f)-91 _ I nl ,.mant Nn I _. FOR REDUCED PLANS O + OR+GMAL SCALE 5 M NC+ES I T iNEaEE•GE�� cr •TR. - cC0'n'O EC•E OOC' Eh ".cEh s'' . 2cl � • UND£S WG,EC _- h G,` -0., S:, A— �hY -CA. +C.,,c(M vURSJ.hT m, - . LAYOUT SCALE- 1•-50' ru 07203 L -41 98 ;a �U349i — D Z - W g IL _ , 0 W D V W - O a IL 1 CURVE - DATA -. - -- RADIUS -POINT NO. R -T - L N . - E If 1800 5'22'11 84.41' 168.64' - 283411.298 714028.300 -Ev. 31061 AS BUILT PLATS 11 _ C i Contract No. /o 3 V 911 Date Completed -I,-,3f)-91 _ I nl ,.mant Nn I _. FOR REDUCED PLANS O + OR+GMAL SCALE 5 M NC+ES I T iNEaEE•GE�� cr •TR. - cC0'n'O EC•E OOC' Eh ".cEh s'' . 2cl � • UND£S WG,EC _- h G,` -0., S:, A— �hY -CA. +C.,,c(M vURSJ.hT m, - . LAYOUT SCALE- 1•-50' ru 07203 L -41 98 ;a �U349i — D Id I i i D _ -- NOTE■ FOR OOPLETE"•: RIGHT OF WAY' M fn x x a I- Z o JU � d c C 0 sl � z� W 'Z ? r� W o! � W' O 0� z Q: J( VI I W; a RADIUS POINT THE CONTF R 'S "i71T DISTRICT OFFICE. OVERLAY F yr E FROM STA EXISTING; 800" 1ITHIN TEN WORCING DAYS res 52.84' 105.52' 281138.742 715574.704 DURING cc ABS SIRE NOT TO BE DIMMED. 16S111G PA9EIPIIT TRM61TIai1`s f FOR RAILS \ DETAIL S_ vc�Y��.. E _ FLwr ,1 w-r � W m j O W �1�na✓. Wm m H EXSITIIMG ST Zm Y OF ti. O <W 2 up u M fn x x a I- Z o JU � d c C 0 sl � z� W 'Z ? r� W o! � W' O 0� z Q: J( VI I W; a 7f�E 2.21{7.5 1a 98 c� raK_Mm+ a. s RADIUS POINT bFy WAT DATA SEE R 'S "i71T DISTRICT OFFICE. - yr E vS COMPLETE TK A.C. 800" 1ITHIN TEN WORCING DAYS res 52.84' 105.52' 281138.742 715574.704 {7{011 TAPER (SEE ABS SIRE NOT TO BE DIMMED. 16S111G PA9EIPIIT TRM61TIai1`s f vc�Y��.. E _ FLwr ,1 w-r � . STS EXIST C. 0 S '1' ;' W TCH G O - ','r• ";; f` ate` �'-r +' '` .. `�J ..sue*, �1�na✓. 7f�E 2.21{7.5 1a 98 c� raK_Mm+ a. s CURVE DATA RADIUS POINT NO. R T L N E 12 800" ` x 52.84' 105.52' 281138.742 715574.704 {7{011 TAPER (SEE CURVE DATA RADIUS POINT NO. R T L N E 12 800" 7'33'27• 52.84' 105.52' 281138.742 715574.704 F.)R REDUCED PLANS O 4 2 3 LAYOUT SCALEm 1' -50' L -42 ni 07203 Fe 103491 ��.. -.2.r 3•!!; AS BUILT PLANS - Contract Na �� 1 <-• C G i MEREBv GEA FV iMIi tHLS:S TW EAU /{GLi F�wOr Twi /B3+ JJ I Date Completed y 4� -Q�_ I UNDEPwDPEC»0 ED- EDN'ROLONiMbM1E1N5.CMNE�CU -E .L*�•ccaz�.no•� =v xe.E anECiDR of m.r,SPO�r,ataR Document Na z D I j 5 do "ad Ax V O J 2 NDTEv FOR CMILETE RIGHT OF WAY SEE R I GHT OF WAY MAPS AT DISTRICT lu.5 OFFICE. 4 r x ­W c� V. 3-53 4t Ax 0 0 q W-3 40 - - - - - - - - - - - - - Owe- COLAKT► qourE Won 118 i 2.2/17.5 49 1 98 ENGMEER x TRA!4S RAILROAD INT 3 STA.639-70 S SHEET S16E'EDGE OF OUT SEE DETAIL THIS R/R TRAM x ,�—EP Z :E 16' w ROUTE 118 .j 99 WI 0 1w c .a LEGEND - - "REMOVE EXISTING-A-C. AND PLACE A.C. OVERLAY To MATCH ExiST ' NG GRADE (BOTH SIDES OF THE R/R TRACKS). 161— ii6• _-EP/ TRANSITION TAPER AS BUILT PAVEMENT TRANS ITION,,DETAIL CONTRACT, NO— NO SCALE RESIDENT MIMI NOTE- EXACT TRANSITIONS TO BE DETERMINED BY THE ENGINEER BASED DATE_�_�� ON THE EXISTING ROADWAY CONDITIONS. i — FOP REUM-LD FLAMS 0 oRr*JAL SCALE IS w WCHES AS N BUILT PLAS Conifact Na 19 7 ZQ 3 y9! -0-4=_1E C0­0- ­E bOVE DDC..E,T1­f, U%DER D.RECTION ANC CO��L 1.15 �TE,� S�C�E�T. G4 044.E -%,� ­T T0 C Date Completed 1�- -1-0 - 91 ALJT�Z^� By �E 0,REC-0A C-O�Z%,POFIA O« w4s 4 X! Document No. a -1 A Z LAYOUT SCtLEt 1*=50' L-43 Cu 07203 EA C3a91 IT lR r- x STATE OF CALIFORNIA • DEPARTMENT OF TRAN PORTATION R GCS PROJECT DEVELOPMENT R AO0 D w 0 c m M cn '3Z CA p� Q C I T1 D Z cn I r 4 i i i I a 4gi A J 1x° yY� C H _ T, JA I i •I •N I •r n c m s tt a$ Y N 'r II I 61 I� AO0 D w 0 c m M cn '3Z CA p� Q C I T1 D Z cn I r 4 i i i I a 4gi A J 1x° yY� C H _ T, JA I i •I •N I •r n c m s N N Q1 tf 'r II I I I� N • ,O O • N N Q1 w a • N v I A r ^> r r N 0 a 0 u a tD r O. d .. tirfi rfea4irrr k *fy�?t�4� � �� -. } r hi it K PROJECT EN0114ER P. H. HSU I rk 1 v 1 1 I y •�..Y a% ��` Q I �a�EK °,� . ,ME�ICD Alo f A s °m a -Asa N O F I tlA' ?:t, ti'I CALCULATED/ CC DATE REVISED BY'': DESIGNED BY CHECKED BY I FIT DATE REVISED N A m 1` �1 1 ' 4 � 1 V, IN 1 { r f �il� ��`n � f• x "' I oo< � 7 I �g N N FS j x tlA' ?:t, ti'I CALCULATED/ CC DATE REVISED BY'': DESIGNED BY CHECKED BY I FIT DATE REVISED N A m 1` �1 1 ' 4 � 1 V, IN 1 { r f �il� ��`n � f• x "' I oo< � 7 I �g N N FS j t� x N I STATE OF CALIFORNIA - DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION K AD r1JffiUnff PROJECT DEVELOPMENT P. H. HSU y� 7 __JIATCH E 0- I ' D ^^ _w Q '' V/ 0 Z co o. toj e a , 1% amp m�z �YU= a ��a o FF!!11�TT sQ� o L; I s V N C O N W a n u r a U1 • _ "T K AD r1JffiUnff PROJECT DEVELOPMENT P. H. HSU y� 7 __JIATCH E 0- I ' D ^^ _w Q '' V/ 0 Z co o. toj e a , 1% amp m�z �YU= a ��a o FF!!11�TT sQ� o L; I s V N C O N W a n u r a U1 • i A rn K ss Q Z F o�m /'f D 4 _ HITCH BLVD ~ m D _o 06 Ld b IyN,�o�g co M ■ CALCULATED/ CC DATE REVISED BY DESIGNED BY CHECKED BY RT DATE REVISED 4. od • y 9 dR ES CANYgn \ a'atq n^jr,� IG ,x4.!*k,tX'G'IeC^rl rtXA yam. �nwn A. .II 70 b 141 ml XIAI'lIY ly! if'y,44 5 �) M fn ` 2N F 'I I �jliil i ,I I I �lll r it i'j II I I I' iil III - I 3 : d { as I I1�1 P 1.50 1 D NOTE■ FOR COMPLETE RIGHT. OF WAY DATA SEE RIGHT OF RAY MAPS AT DISTRICT OFFICE. y x. ms DrSTJ ITT ROUTE I TOTpLxPp E 07 Yen Ila 2.2/17 -5 trr< ENGINEER 1-22-90 .. 3660E PLL\S APPROVAL DATE • U30) OWL fwf ui= ' F:] e� r •zcs .ant �x4t - acs .may.--- •—-- a�_ = -. - F-+i � � _ —_ oz_ - •- v `C EXISTING CONCRETE SLABS ARE NOT JO BE W _DISTURBED DURING "CONSTRUCTION.. o 0 1 - z / J; s r O ­3 O > r id v Ix r 4m2 W . W c�r� tf T EP y x. ms DrSTJ ITT ROUTE I TOTpLxPp E 07 Yen Ila 2.2/17 -5 trr< ENGINEER 1-22-90 .. 3660E PLL\S APPROVAL DATE • U30) OWL fwf ui= ' F:] e� r •zcs .ant �x4t - acs .may.--- •—-- a�_ = -. - F-+i � � _ —_ oz_ - AS BUILT- CONTRACT- NO >0,3494 I RESIDENT EN W" DATE - LAYOUT SCALE, 1' - 50' FOR REDUCED PLANS J r 2 3 NOCU a.« -a-.• 0E.. 3,N, AS BUILT PLAN DEAL KALE tS "'mss 1 C Contract No DT- /o35/ _ - - - - -- - mac: Date Completed 6Y- J6 - 91 I 1 UNDER CEt: ECT*"TTN S ONTO,, 1-C 1C VTTE COPP O E. O CNJ OOCUVE RSt .y VNCERWOtRECTONti`IO WHIAGI OM TRti GATE IN yCMUEMlO CJWFORx:u NV0.St:V{`TO i Document Na .uTHORizwrgR ar rnE ptRECROR OF .R• sEO. .nom Z a L -46 Cu 07203 SEA 103491 C D z t •- v `C W o 0 - z / J; s r ­3 r h AS BUILT- CONTRACT- NO >0,3494 I RESIDENT EN W" DATE - LAYOUT SCALE, 1' - 50' FOR REDUCED PLANS J r 2 3 NOCU a.« -a-.• 0E.. 3,N, AS BUILT PLAN DEAL KALE tS "'mss 1 C Contract No DT- /o35/ _ - - - - -- - mac: Date Completed 6Y- J6 - 91 I 1 UNDER CEt: ECT*"TTN S ONTO,, 1-C 1C VTTE COPP O E. O CNJ OOCUVE RSt .y VNCERWOtRECTONti`IO WHIAGI OM TRti GATE IN yCMUEMlO CJWFORx:u NV0.St:V{`TO i Document Na .uTHORizwrgR ar rnE ptRECROR OF .R• sEO. .nom Z a L -46 Cu 07203 SEA 103491 C D z t / J; AS BUILT- CONTRACT- NO >0,3494 I RESIDENT EN W" DATE - LAYOUT SCALE, 1' - 50' FOR REDUCED PLANS J r 2 3 NOCU a.« -a-.• 0E.. 3,N, AS BUILT PLAN DEAL KALE tS "'mss 1 C Contract No DT- /o35/ _ - - - - -- - mac: Date Completed 6Y- J6 - 91 I 1 UNDER CEt: ECT*"TTN S ONTO,, 1-C 1C VTTE COPP O E. O CNJ OOCUVE RSt .y VNCERWOtRECTONti`IO WHIAGI OM TRti GATE IN yCMUEMlO CJWFORx:u NV0.St:V{`TO i Document Na .uTHORizwrgR ar rnE ptRECROR OF .R• sEO. .nom Z a L -46 Cu 07203 SEA 103491 C D z t 00, ° °0 D (D (� Z o0 Z p C T 1 Z �m I aayy�mjj � 2�d I 11� hqhgg �ggU xxx��o r� v� �x a' F� N C N K A' ral6tVW PROJECT DEVELOPMENT I P. H. HSU µby r �✓ w 1 4� aL�ypL { CALCULATED/ j WI �• C DESIGNED BY CC d REVISED BY vii .y O 00, ° °0 D (D (� Z o0 Z p C T 1 Z �m I aayy�mjj � 2�d I 11� hqhgg �ggU xxx��o r� v� �x a' F� N C N K A' ral6tVW PROJECT DEVELOPMENT I P. H. HSU µby r �✓ w 1 4� aL�ypL w CALCULATED/ �• C DESIGNED BY CC REVISED BY O s m D CHECKED BY RT N -( O : O N O s O LW t r d _Z �o s;o D;o A m 00 a p, N N — r a N w a � m 7 O � N N N Q N m Z Qt � � n CD 0o r � y i V \\\ r �✓ w 1 4� aL�ypL w CALCULATED/ DATE DESIGNED BY CC REVISED BY CHECKED BY RT DATE REVISED V \\\ t it6,.. .g4q'n Y t1yytJi�£ - )\ \ r I \{ n � i h.., Y•. "'4" "L'wi it t Yi v r a + P A , ly f f F � r t` p �1 {r� r �✓ w 1 4� aL�ypL w t it6,.. .g4q'n Y t1yytJi�£ - )\ \ r I \{ n � i h.., Y•. "'4" "L'wi it t Yi v r a + P A , ly f f F � r t` p �1 {r� v E 9 S n• 'o D )a� Cn 1 Z co ' o C i o D iz �1 m� m AI m p a� s N O - N r STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION I� PROJECT DEVELOPMENT k, t 0 w I - 0 W v a ro v •' P. H. HSU �i o i AV, 74 z I Im � MATCH LI N X CALCULATED/ CC DATE REVI56� BY DESIGNED BY CHECKED BY RT DATE REVISED x 13.50 O rm � 1 ,1;11111`11 1 Im A� i 1111111 STA.717•75 i PM 15.58 1 l i °•� , 1 �" � � � ;Ji� R�? r.',� `+ , )r��' �I', 1 � X11 I Z C A cv m : Z I, I p C a STA, --- --- s PM 15. 75 g o • 00 Q' N D-1 rn O D cn F Z 1 M 2 G C s ?D r r• r m D :g I ' b C, r � P. H. HSU �i o i AV, 74 z I Im � MATCH LI N X CALCULATED/ CC DATE REVI56� BY DESIGNED BY CHECKED BY RT DATE REVISED x 13.50 O rm � 1 ,1;11111`11 1 Im A� i 1111111 STA.717•75 i PM 15.58 1 l i °•� , 1 �" � � � ;Ji� R�? r.',� `+ , )r��' �I', 1 � X11 I Z C A cv m : Z I, I p C a STA, --- --- s PM 15. 75 g o • 00 Q' N r- �.z P. H. HSU �i o i AV, 74 z I Im � MATCH LI N X CALCULATED/ CC DATE REVI56� BY DESIGNED BY CHECKED BY RT DATE REVISED x 13.50 O rm � 1 ,1;11111`11 1 Im A� i 1111111 STA.717•75 i PM 15.58 1 l i °•� , 1 �" � � � ;Ji� R�? r.',� `+ , )r��' �I', 1 � X11 I Z C A cv m : Z I, I p C a STA, --- --- s PM 15. 75 g o • 00 Q' N V O N STATE OF CALIFORNIA • DEPARTMENT OF TRAN ORTATION R iZl6VJW PROJECT DEVELOPMENT k x y jy c n � MATCH LINE STA. 728.00 \/• o�> 0 a� 3 co �• Z z�Q C p� D Z Cn i I �I n �LI ,I Y ' t �m Nam m�o imn U_ m � $�R w A� >P; R I �A 0 ^,a ' •I Y t. I n_ A e1` [S k I II II �� II I, u o I .. i{ .� .• � .- .,��i.�y �,, � 'I� j f *i rail a �- r .b O PRoJ[CT [NORRER CALCULATED/ CC DATE O DESKiNED ET . s -1 P. H. HSU CHECKED 8Y `'.: RT v: bA7R 11EVISED' ". y jy c n � MATCH LINE STA. 728.00 \/• o�> 0 a� 3 co �• Z z�Q C p� D Z Cn i I �I n �LI ,I Y ' t �m Nam m�o imn U_ m � $�R w A� >P; R I �A 0 ^,a ' •I Y :t id I n_ [S k I II II �� II I, u o I 1 n� a �- r .b O I, C O s -1 0 w d Do I O: z on n a �m o ''t CD z z C O,r 1 I v , A � ..• j ,II � ��, � • s t.,l�j 1i Y rn oo p rl AYi 1. . j I o I LA I t a I ...I I � �, .. I � �J y f� •F �}' lH �^`q�'n4k ` iVtli � � `7 h l..a .. 1. M U'. s 'y 1,. .M!'.�.. , � 1 I l 0 I I II• � Ilr��v ( , �. a, w. ' 1 I I' 1 10 �,�•....., ,Ji ` sc�,�tla k�;� � , �>k!,!'�'Id'� �*�'' � ..r } tic }� k 1.. r 1 9 1, i. i t I I i I I II 11 .1 1 :t id [S k I II II �� II I, r I 1 .b 9 1, i. i t I I i I I II 11 .1 1 :t id w!••n l;� �� II r r I 1 I, _ -1 er:lk* I=� 9 1, i. i t I I i I I II 11 .1 1 I POST A R0 MILES MI IT, C_T" TOTAL PlWT 118 2-2/17.5 56 98 07 V 4" . J. NOTES FOR COMPLETE RIGHT OF WA**DATA. SEE RIGHT OF WAY MAPS AT-DISTRICT REGfbROD CnIlL BMAdMR OFFICE. x P_ H. HSU 1-22-90 PLANS APPFOVAL DATE 3fifiofi -S&S 4 ad W ! ' Im L ad -9 t or B1 3 AS "0 C09TRACT s r <i'. -.2 m STA. 747•s7 1) AT scr APPROX. IHTx. Wm 7 39 _ivl C) C> a> 1 '48' -5�3 300 120' .100" • - -R/W. TRANSITION A/W wV __7 on C> -- — --------- A Owl ROUTP-1 18 —.7 t< S 89'39'56' 'n E z Ld - . .- -7 z I- . _j _j Lp R/W EP ETW EIN 0 sl sp MIN STA. 75700 _z_COLD PLANE A7. 15'. WIN. AND PLACE A. C. APPROX. JIWTX; OVERLAY TO AIATCH EXIST_ GRADE TYP W 1 z -, 1 ir I L'i �.T 19 1 Ca 0 ti _j o W Ul 0 Ix CL IE 9.3. 4- x 01 IRS 1- - - v LAYOUT 10. IE SCALES 1' 50' L-50 FOP RIEDLN-M-E) PLANS 0 1 2 3 Cu 07203 491 AS BUILT PLANS OFOGINAL SCALE IS 04 INCHES I I I I • Contract Na f9 Z - /113 5/9'S/ DjCUUENTT�Em - -91 �DE­VRECTION­,DCOMTROLEN THtSDATEII4 SAC�IEWO CAWOR­VR —ml To p -16 -F�"'SPOTA'"O" Date Com leted 3� ^UlmORLZATION By _E DIRECTOR L Domment No. -,2 Q - 9 I v• I M STATE OF CALIFORNIA • DEPARTMENT Of TRAl13FUNTATIVN PROJECT DEVELOPMENT is a A M 1 ACT ENOINE P. H. HSU C MIRA SOL DR MATCH LINE STA. 757 +00 vl - II /• cn D0 o D 3 a Co zip C D jl \i �Cm , V = ' 4oA , ' g> t ppyy j W m CQ, zm 8� _ sm oz 1 e_ i A j -o N o ' F ,I I � I ,! I !I I i M M � — m D N �i Rat V f 1 W I � I 0 rry K 1z'..� Iii O f1 I � �r m� f� 'III �C a � 0 w s iD r 1 p v� o ' F ,I I � I ,! I !I I i M M � — m D N �i Rat A f 1 W he II I I "•' ,� � Safi ' ,� ; � • I �•� � � R I I � � D I' I III I � fl • I I II P & i I I � �' I I � f� � III Y � � Y ti '`y�'• ' ` ° ` �" I � j rr y, . „ T G I ,. r .,.: 1 t� -. i I rx �l2 Ii' } •4UW��. 4 gti , i � t ii II I,.,,�� I � ,I � ' � � I OO i �a R� j� � �•,�:y,., �1F1 I � t, ' •;\ ;�',�� I� 11.1; ; !, 1 I ... i . !i S 9S911d TIERRA REJADA RD r �„ I . .4 � m0 i • tl11N��� � �i P fa r f 1 W I 0 rry K 1z'..� Iii CABBERT -Rd- I � f� 'III i • tl11N��� � �i P fa r „ 1 W I 0 rry K 1z'..� Iii / / P.1 f� 'III 1 p ao • A6g v �� MATCH LINE STA. 771.50 w i • tl11N��� � �i V v• i M \ k N k i STATE OF CALIFORNIA • DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION I PROJECT ENOWEER I CALCULATED/ CC DATE REVISED BY A PROJECT DEVELOPMENT P. H. HSU DESIDNEO BY _ CHECKED BY IRT I I DATE REVISED 00 000 D co r^ V/ 'h z(D o C Q D Z Cn Q • N f FI a� , 3t .fir.• � 9�p ' n >om oN 2 In CI �Qox Tm rigy _TA �Z > ym O Cl C 0• •N c c M D C s 7 LA W v• n rD r m n 1� O i I �5 I n c) r1 --4 P1 r. �m m AA Ot r, ,,,,,, +••YwwariunuWA�i:rx:_ M+wMmnWn mare v+R' nn +1 Mn.• i, yy JJ e,,twr•ar wl dTxn^u ew •r qun9ir mww� rn u: Ili �m I i Y N SI 40 i,,.. i I1� SVASTA AVE , r i jl I — iA N r1 o F i y t0 r 1, D •on.I DC- OE-+z-ws 40[v. sou[ I - " SCALE °��"` SCALE � IN "� `S � Cu 07203 EA X03491 AS BUILT PLANS Contract No. e97— /eD 3�Y 9Y _ 1■ • • • . - - - - C Date Completed �- J6 - 7 / 1 I UNDER DIRE Y ION N S r N ROL N 71LS 31'E IN O� O *. - <9 ,,f OR1,A hT'. <{ UNDERYY DIRECTION AND CGNTRO�Oh'H15."wc'E �h S<:.q<NE�- n[Gi.[OS... <wJaS:I.\ .ur o - Document N0. , _ r.... o er rHEoaE 'ov ocr <hs .rleh V v• i R R n• _ STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT Of tRANSRORTATION PROjeeT eNanateR CA�CULATEO/ �� ATE REVISED BY DESIGNED BY AD CZf6Ct W PROJECT DEVELOPMENT P. H. HSU CHECKED BY RT _DATEREVISBD ° °o D 2 9 R Cn (D3S1 00 Z z� Q CJ Q � 1 1 V D R • N x:: onr', � F[m m Ana Pn� yI b a �g* zio 84� iQ c _ I 1 V I H a� z� 0 -N 0 a f a r Ln LA .r v• MATCH LINE STA. 815.00 IT ,I I , < < J ' , it I I� � ,..• � 'I LA i I \ W rA "'rrrbbb , 1- N IL. 821.90 i PM I ;. 49 � END CONSTRUCT I ON k I INtx, j I MOORPARK AVE Jr ,I I j p I I 1 I, i � v Y e w KM a+ "wY• 4c s .,.rc 11 I, R - •,5K .. aJ 'I 1 t r' I tt 1 a • � , it � i � i � � �� I ��, � W r> I N i j �I ,I 1� 'I .f �I II1( !I i CD N ory�r44 z 1^ D N I W m A r 1 0 a f a r Ln LA .r v• MATCH LINE STA. 815.00 IT ,I I , < < J ' , it I I� � ,..• � 'I LA i I \ W rA "'rrrbbb , 1- N IL. 821.90 i PM I ;. 49 � END CONSTRUCT I ON k I INtx, j I MOORPARK AVE Jr ,I I j p I I 1 I, i � v Y e w KM a+ "wY• 4c s .,.rc 11 I, R - •,5K .. aJ 'I 1 t r' I tt 1 a • � , it � i � i � � �� I ��, � W r> I N i j �I ,I 1� 'I .f �I II1( !I i Q or y Wm la L. 0 < o uY v JN1 W W 2 '10 U N N Q _ W O V Z REFLECTIVE O ob r - Y W N � W r m I > o ad LJ Ir J dr N W O e- O > r = _. W Q to W K O W = O W SOLID r Z r —_ PAVEMENT MARK I MG f Q O G W (1 WHITE w 22_ TIERRA REJADA RD./ GABBERT RD_ or y Wm la L. 0 < o uY v JN1 W W 2 '10 U N N Q _ W O V Z REFLECTIVE Z ob r - Z — _r 2.2/17.5 95 98 r J N t r _22-C40 OV dr O4L W J. G•l �� e- O V N F _. SOLID ,- WO N V _ W — W N W_ 1KII I TE .:. W YELLOW SOLID r Z SOLID —_ PAVEMENT MARK I MG f r Z G H WHITE 22_ TIERRA REJADA RD./ GABBERT RD_ YELLOW Q d WO MAUREEN LANE Q d 4• 14. GOLDMAN AVE. (DETAIL 9) (DETAIL 6) DETAIL i9) 4' TYPICAL STRIPING WITHOUT -LEFT TURN POCKET l- u_ PAVEMENT DELINEATION QUANTITY SUMMARY REFLECTIVE DES [OINi: ROUTS PosT ..iES TO„ - TOTAL MO_ SAFE 07 Vef 111118 _r 2.2/17.5 95 98 REUSTE ED &11L EF060JEFR t 1 4- R_ K. 5 FUKUlADTO _22-C40 „ 33016 PLaaS aFPR:, -vt DATE 0 r W J. G•l �� PAVEMENT DELINEATION QUANTITY SUMMARY T M. M. t- J . REFLECTIVE PAINT THERMOPLASTIC TRAFFIC STRIPE 1. 4- 4' 4' 4' 4' 1 4- 8' 15. PAVEMENT MARKERS 2 -COAT DETAIL 27A (PAINT 2 -COAT) DETAIL 38 < -- r w W SOLID BROKEN BROKEN BROKEN & DOUBLE DOUBLE SOLID THERMOPLASTIC TYPE TYPE TYPE 4' SOLID LOCATION 1KII I TE WHITE YELLOW SOLID SOL 10 SOLID WHITE PAVEMENT MARK I MG a D G H WHITE 22_ TIERRA REJADA RD./ GABBERT RD_ YELLOW YELLOW YELLOW 23. MAUREEN LANE 12. NORTH ST. 14. GOLDMAN AVE. (DETAIL 9) (DETAIL 6) DETAIL i9) (DETAIL 22)(DETAIL 29 )(DETAIL 38 EA. EA. EA. L. F. L. F. L. F. L. F. L. F. L. F. L. F. L. F. SO. FT. FROM V I WYARD AVE. 3.670 l 200 170 153.600 5.000 4.200 27.600 5.600X2 - 26.220X2 - 16.440X4 4.900 2.800 TO MOORPARK AVE. 11,200 52.440 65,760 TOTAL 4.040 153.600 166.200 4.900 2.800 T M. M. t- J . o STREET DETAIL 29 DETAIL 22 (THERMOPLASTIC) 1. ROSE AVE. (THERM)PLASTIC) TYPE IV (L) ARROWS DONLON RD. 2. NORTH CLUBHOUSE DR. (THERMOPLASTIC) ( 15. W 3. DETAIL 27A (PAINT 2 -COAT) DETAIL 38 < -- r w W (THERMOPLASTIC) 17- BALCOM CANYON RD. 5. - FOw •C -OE -W 4"Ew. 31•K' =3' 12' GRIMES CANYON RD. rC9 o 12' -------- -- -- -- -- - -- --- --------- - - -- -- -- - 19. u 11 1 DETAIL 27A (PAINT 2 -COAT) 1 20. BUTTER CREEK RD. 8. RANCHO HELENA a 21. I50' & VAR T M. M. t- J . o STREET 1. ROSE AVE. 14. DONLON RD. 2. NORTH CLUBHOUSE DR. 15. LA CUMBRE RD_ 3. MESA SCHOOL RD./LA VISTA AVE. 16. r w 4. WALNUT AVE. 17- BALCOM CANYON RD. 5. - FOw •C -OE -W 4"Ew. 31•K' 7 o,o j END DETAIL 27A TYPICAL STRIPING WITH LEFT TURN POCKET (SEE LAYOUT PLAN FOR EXACT DIMENSIONS) 120' C SANTA CLARA AVE DELINEATION PLAN (EXISTING STOP SIGNS ARE TO REMAIN IN PLACE) B A DETAIL 29 ERIOPLAST I C) ,-DETAIL 27A '.2AINT 2 -COAT) DETAIL 27A (PAINT 2 -COAT) 3�' 1 AS BUILT " CONTRACT W 10349 RES9XfT .ENGR. DATE - AS BUILT PLANS Contract Na OZ - /D 3 V FY Date Completed y- -10 - 9/ Document Na LOCATIONS OF LEFT TURN POCKETS • I CROSS STREET 1. ROSE AVE. 14. DONLON RD. 2. NORTH CLUBHOUSE DR. 15. LA CUMBRE RD_ 3. MESA SCHOOL RD./LA VISTA AVE. 16. SANG CANYON RD- 4. WALNUT AVE. 17- BALCOM CANYON RD. 5. CENTER SCHOOL RD. 18. GRIMES CANYON RD. 6. PRICE RD. 19. HITCH BLVD. 7. AGGEN RD. 20. BUTTER CREEK RD. 8. RANCHO HELENA 21. MiRA SOL DR. 9. GROVE PL. (WEST) 22_ TIERRA REJADA RD./ GABBERT RD_ 10. GROVE PL.(EAST) 11. BRADLEY RD. 23. MAUREEN LANE 12. NORTH ST. 14. GOLDMAN AVE. 13. LEWIS RD. I25. SHASTA AVE. 2E. GISLER CT. 128- 27- PARK LANE MOORPARK AVE. PAvEMENT DELINEATION PLAN NO SCALE PD -I FOR REDUCED PLANS O , 2 3 •! ORIGAL SCALE a W wC.ES ! 1 1 i Cu 07203 j EA 103491 _ - '-E -EB�CE 97—TIAT T- S-.S AMUE AND A='FATE COPT OE TI_ ABOVE DOCUMENT TAKEV i "Cl � - • A,1HO H` DIf.E eY r:RZCTT 0 Oh TFLSOrAV. WJNYEYYO.UUFCFh1A PURSIMNT TJ i A;."NOF.2A-�Oh BT-.+E G:FECTOF O %TAANSPOFtATgN ) D p � > N m j p W W � N_ W F W a OL O z ... O CD r W m O r0 <W O Z W aW UO V U W z I - W pt Z Q W � c° -i s I I o r- c l :i o U. *.-I < WI Cc C L! .0 o! of 5 i P o� WI p� _ 1+Y POST MILES TOTAL I 06T CO[M��� TOTK PROJECT NO. SrEETS 1071 Ven 118 2.2/17.5 1 96 1 98 FEG6TEItM CIVIL EMCIEER R. K. FUKl1R10TO s I - ? -90 C33015 PLUG APPROVAL DATE • I 1 `• E 6/30/ CIVIL 50' & VAR. 50' E VAR 50' & VAR. I ,F o C. IEDGE OF BUS STOP PALS I DETAIL 38A EDGE OF SHOULDER 1. EDGE OF S4ouLDER DETAIL iP _ Atl (PAINT 2-COAT) 40 7 4- C3 F z N ? x a W z r N DETAIL 27A 0 ( PA!NT 2-COAT) �- 12.2' 16' - -12, - -12, fO OC•OC -*Z— dW.. Si M. 50' TYPICAL PAVEMENT DELINEATION - DETAIL:AT SCHOOL BUS STOP AS BUILT CoNTRACT MO— ie 3d 9d RESMW EKBR ra OATF -� 130' .L 27o' i 250' ' 280' 1 CONCRETE PAD (WEIGH STATIO►i) ( DETAIL 36 I DETAIL 387 15' I I — 4' SOLID WHITE STRIPE DETAIL 27A (.-At NT 2 -COAT) NOTES ALL TRAFFIC STRIPES AND PAVEMENT MARKINGS SHALL BE THERMOPLASTIC UNLESS OTHERWISE INDiCATEU. D C B A 250' '24.2' DETAIL 36 5o' 150' I Z � a N r DETAIL 8 z DETAIL 27A ~ N ^(PAINT 2 -COAT) L - w .DIRECTIONS z OF TRAFFIC 1 - 1 o ROUTE 118 12' — — — — — — 12 4' 12' 12' 12' WHITE DIAGONALS AT 25' SPACING DETAIL 22 \ DETAIL 27A (PAINT 2 -CCAT) PAVEMENT DELINEATION AT WESTBOUND WEIGH STATION 1 AS BUILT PLANS � i ContractNa 07 -1D S/9,/ Date Completed y- 30 - 91 I PAVEMENT DELINEATION PLAN Document Na SCALE PD -2 FOR RFDl10ED PLANS 0 z 1 OPJGNAL S'KE 6 N NCW-S _ L A 1 I Cu 07203 1 E 103491 � ` T� INE AEP"CF�In'TNAT T 6�S ATR'i �ND -:: uM ���OP� "J= �. anO.E iO�Jwch: if [Eh UN DEP W DaE ^ SUN AND CONTROL vh Tnb w'E IN YCiw Eh TG C :'•On hl� PUfiS.:AN'.J C � D u D L NOTES* I. DIMENSIONS OF THE STRUCTURAL SECTIONS ARE SUBJECT TO TOLERANCES SPECIFIED IN THE STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS. 2. SUPERELEVATION AS SHOWN OR AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER. 3. DIG OUT AND REPAIR AREAS OF SEVERE FAILURE (RUTTING >1/2 INCH. LOOSE PAVEMENT OR $PALLING), AND CLEAN AND SEAL ALL CRACKS 1 /41NCH WIDE OR WIDER. 4. COLD PLANE 0.15' . MIN. ALL INTERSECTIONS AND PLACE A.C. OVERLAY TO MATCH EXISTING GRADE. STOPPING AT THE FLOWLINE. THE EXACT LOCATION IS TO BE DETERMINED BY THE ENGINEER BASED ON EXISTING DRAINAGE CONOITIONS. 5. REMOVE AND REPLACE TO A DEPTH OF 0.6' W; TH A.0 FOR A'4Y ALLIGATOR CRACKS IN THE WIDENED AREA (OUTS IDE THE PORTION WITH UNDERLYING P.C.0 PAVEMENT).AS DEFINED BY ENGINEER, THEN PLACE PAVEMENT REINFORCING FABRIC (PRF) OVER CE14TRAL PORTION. (SEE SHEET X -4 FOR LOCATIONS) ° R/W R/W W Y N ° m 60'-80' & VARIES W I N > 4 EP ^^ Ep ¢ o Type of x W METAL BEAM a GUARDRAIL f ETW € ETW 'VAR. 12' 12' 4' 4' W(D } 0- m <° o W W z U V U JVI W J 0 V rcl W x N - W = a z Z ~ o E-I W clo d d 1 O � J z s W E- > o c z i I- c (% c W o O NMI" DEPTH OF DITCH 10' OR VARIAB ZY_ & VAR. ZX & VAR. SHOULDER BACKING. \l LE I_- iBOTH SIDES R� �L - --- - --- -- _ - I %7iC\�----?2, � /,�C - -77,� --- 7/,(l� ` /.klG---7mY---�ltlR - -7l,AR --- 7llR�--• �1.� -" �'C"---° - -. .,. LEXISTING P.C.C. EXISTING A.C. TYPICAL SECTION STA. 1688.76 TO STA. 29636 T =0.50' STA. 296.66 TO STA. 702.92 T =O.E5' STA. 70322 TO STA. 746.00 T =0.50' RAW R/W ETW ETW Type O2 , 1 Type O 1 I~ Type 0 EP 2' -4' 2' 12'- �j 10' 12' 2' 2' -4' METAL BEAM V BL Ep GUARDRAIL ARIA € ( & VAR. ZX & VAR. SHOULDER BACKING. I Zc :: -- -- -- -----� H SIDES - -- ---- --- -------- - ---- --- - BO ------ �V- - -- rte----,.; � - - -mac 16'��lJ1- . -•71r` tea,` LEXISTING P.C.C. EXISTING A.C. TYPICAL LEFT TURN POCKET (APPROACHING THE INTERSECTION OF THE STREET) STA. 16.88.76 TO STA. 296.36 T =0.50' STA. 29666 TO STA. 702.92 T =0.65' STA. 703.22 TO STA. 746.00 T =0.50' w it. FOIW OC- OE -12- HNEV. N /NII R/W MATCH EXIST. GRADE —1 I EP ETW 11'& VAR. 4' 1 12' I12X & VAR. J�..__-___ l -------------------- _-------- _ —_ --- --/7,�t ----;7.: ---- na.------ !- 16' --I LEXISTING P.C.C. EXISTING PVMT E/B WEIGH STATION STA. 620.00: TO STA. 632-00± (NORTH SIDE) STA. 622.40! TO STA. 634.70t(SOUTH SIDE) 80-' 25' & VAR. 0.65' A. C. LASPHALT CONCRETE Q ASPHALT CONCRETE r0'A'T"E'- G U I L T 'RgCT N0._1P3494 NT ENGR. TY PE TYPE 3 _ _ _ FOR REDUCED PLANS O f 2 3 ORIGINAL SCALE IS N xN_MGS 1 1 1 . -i CONSTRUCTION — 12' — 3:1_& VAR. KT COUNTY RO(JTE �� ��? TOTLL PKiOJE.,T SHET. TO TA W.. SHti' 0.50' 0.65' TYPE B 118 ful 2 98 RE EKED CIVIL ENC►EER Q ASPHALT CONCRETE x A' ETW I 1-22-90 H. Hw r TYPE 1O w it. FOIW OC- OE -12- HNEV. N /NII R/W MATCH EXIST. GRADE —1 I EP ETW 11'& VAR. 4' 1 12' I12X & VAR. J�..__-___ l -------------------- _-------- _ —_ --- --/7,�t ----;7.: ---- na.------ !- 16' --I LEXISTING P.C.C. EXISTING PVMT E/B WEIGH STATION STA. 620.00: TO STA. 632-00± (NORTH SIDE) STA. 622.40! TO STA. 634.70t(SOUTH SIDE) 80-' 25' & VAR. 0.65' A. C. LASPHALT CONCRETE Q ASPHALT CONCRETE r0'A'T"E'- G U I L T 'RgCT N0._1P3494 NT ENGR. TY PE TYPE 3 _ _ _ FOR REDUCED PLANS O f 2 3 ORIGINAL SCALE IS N xN_MGS 1 1 1 . -i CONSTRUCTION — 12' — 3:1_& VAR. KT COUNTY RO(JTE �� ��? TOTLL PKiOJE.,T SHET. TO TA W.. SHti' )7 VHfI 118 2.2, 17.5 2 98 RE EKED CIVIL ENC►EER � A' ETW I 1-22-90 H. Hw PLANS APPROVAL DATE WATCH EXIST. GRADE (TYP) EP ETW 0. 65' A. C. R/W R/W EP EP t A' ETW I f ETW 12' j- 12' 4 4 2% & VAR. I 2 && VAR. I - SHOULDER BACKING - - - -- 4, - -- -- ----------------- - - - - -- - -------- ---C - 4(hC-- --n,,R ---- nom---- I - i= 16' —� EXISTING P.C.E. — EXISTING PVMT W/B WEIGH STATION STA. 682-00t. TO STA. 698.10_ (NORTH SIDE ONLY) TYPICAL. CROSS SECTIONS NO SCALE X -i Cu 07203 lEp 103491 C B A I HEREON CERTIFY TIMT THIS IS A TOUR: -10 ACCURATE CCPr O� nIE AOOvE 00CU/AENT TAKEN C X. I AUT"OA ATION NTHEODCOIRROL ON THISOATEIN SACMLENIO.CKIFORH4 PURSUANT TO . AurHOmiwtaH e. THE aaecTOR Or TTL1HS2 AnN S Z b L D D 100'TRANSITION TAPER J r I oZ 0.50' A.C. TOP OF EXIS -. 40' OVERLAY - PAVEMENT 11 u O � N 0.25' MIN i V Z W � m" I ( COLD PLANE AND PLACE A.C. EXIST_ A.C. GVERLAY TO MATCH EXIST. GRADE L EXIST. P.C.C- CD PAVEMENT TRANSITION AT BEGINNING OF N La CONSTRUCTION AND NO CONSTRUCTION AREA W n ¢ o STA. 15.88.76 TO STA- 16.88.76 o STA. 716.75 TO STA. 717.75 STA. 727.00 TO STA. 728.00 NOTEo FOR TYPICAL SECTION NOTES. SEE SHEET X-1. COINTY' ROUTE Yen 118 CTM ENC&* ER 2.2/17.5 I 3 1 98 1 -22 -93 1, PLANS AooRC•Y.t DATE '1 _7 0. 50' A. C. 0.65' A. C. OVERLAY 30 OVERLAY - o> y amo 0 oL 100' TRANSITION TAPER JZ W WrW U W TOP OF EXIST. BRIDGE �l0 0.50' -0.65' A.C_ v o T PVMT- ¢ 40 OVERLAY I6 r0. 60' OR VAR_ V� W DO 1 W z � o N w = r = v O iai 1- o z i r i CL o Co. i J � W LL W o � H z W F 1 U �I W d W °I C •I � IL �60, REMOVE EXIST. A.C. & PLACE A. C_ EXIST. A.C. OVERLAY TO MATCH EXIST. GRADE_ EXIST. P.C.C. EXIST. P.C.C. TO REMAIN INPLACE. PAVEMENT TRANSITION AT BRIDGE APPROACHES STA. 279.57 TO STA. 280-57 STA, 661.86 TO STA. 662.86 STA_ 280.87 TO STA. 281-87 STA. 663.76 TO STA. 664.76 LL Y O v a I50'ALONG THE CENTER LINE I W Cr us- 0 2' 0.65' A.C. 1 0.60' OVERLAY TOP OF PVMT.) - a� ---'1 I ------- - - - - -- EXIST_ A.C. -� I REMOVE EXIST. A.C. & PLACE A.C. OVERLAY TO MATCH EXIST, GRADE. EXIST. P.C.C. EXIST_ P.C.C. TO REMAIN INPLACE_ (SEE SHEETS L -42 & L -43) PAVEMENT TRANSITION AT RAILROAD APPROACHES AS BUILT PLANS Contract Na 47_- /d 3 Y 9y 1 FORV DC- OE -12- ,REV. 3/41191 Date Completed S/- -91 Document Na _ J Z FOR REDUCED PLANS D DRWINAL SCALE IS IN INCHES L * 29x a s E - I I I I I I I I EXIST. A.C- EX I ST. P. C. C. PAVEMENT TRANSITION STA. 296-36 TO STA. 296.66 STA. 702.92 TO STA. 703.22 EP EP ETw ETw I 2.1 2' 4- 12' L 12' 4' + 4' �D 5' A. C. I2 /- 8 VARIABLE OVERLAY SHOULDER BACKING 1 TH SIDES --n��---;:�� - -�r „• -�--- ------ -- --- ------ r„ 16, 1 I+�EXISTING P.C.C. - EXISTING A.C. TYPICAL SECTION WITH EXISTING SUPERELEVATION P. H. HSU 36x,06 6/30/92 CTV - STA.126.74.21 TO STA.129 -37.27 I STA.142.03.78 TO STA.143.61,02 STA.152 -04.iO TO STA. 153.93.81 STA_162.24.56 TO STA.163 +99.75 EP EP 1 ETw ETw �4' --� 12' I 12 1 4' 2'1 2' VAR. 0.5'A.C. OVERLAY I i I 2/ & VARIABLE I I SHOULDER BACKING. �. % BOTH SIDES ----- -- -- EXISTING P.C.C. EXISTING A.C. TYPICAL SECTION WITH EXISTING SUPERELEVATION A S ® U I LT I STA.156.02.38 TO STA.159 -68.64 CONTRACT NO >03494 RESIDENT ENGR. TYPICAL CROSS SECTIONS DATE 470-91 NO SCALE X-2 I I 2 3 1 1 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND ACCURATE COPY OF IHE ASOVE DDCU4t HT TAAEN UNDER VY DIRECTION ANO CONTROL CR THIS DATE IN SACRA V ENTO. CALIFORNIA PURSUANT TO AA�OTTHORIZATION�By TTHH-E, DDIIRECTOR OF TiUNSPO iAiION — • Cu 0703 _ EA ::3491--------- - -- 0 D Z L R/W x • __ D - w In > > ta QD Cl) .40 :)z V 0 -i r7i 4 La X U0 U (A 2: 11-- z 0 _j Ul Ul 0 it ,wl- R/w 60, EP EP — TYPE TYPE (D ETW ETW 1 4'— — 4' BUS STOP PAD 12' 12' VARIES 2Z VAR. VAR. BACKING 4 ------ ---- -------------- L-EXISTING P.C.C. EXISTING A.C. .1 TYPICAL SCHOOL BUS STOP PAD (WESTBOUND, LOCATIONS SEE PLANS) R/W 60, P EP TYPE OI TYPE03 ETW C, ETw F VARIES 4'— —4] 12' 12' 4­ 6'-12• BUS STOP SHOULDER BACKING--�, 2% & VAR. 27 1, IA --------- _�2 16' LEXISTING P.C.C_ EXISTING A.C. TYPICAL SCHOOL BUS STOP PAD (EASTBOUND, LOCATIONS SEE PLANS) R/W R/W Typed ETW R/W ETW 10- MIN 4' I12' f 12' 4 4 2% & VAR. 2-1 & VAF, SHOULDER BACKING ------------- ------------- ------------------------------ z 6VE 'OLRLAY D PLA10 MATCH EXINE PST. LACE GRADE A.C. L-EXISTING P.C.C. I i A S BUILT (SEE NOTE Af EXISTING A.C. 4 CONTRACT NO. 10131494 RESIDENT :ENGR. G-C, Elhier TYPICAL AT INTERSECTION I DATE _4-30-91 R/W ETW t ETW R/W AS BUILT PLANS Contract Na X17 - AQ 1 I Yy Date Completed e- -So - 2/ Document Na [-ST: COL T­ : R0,TE �: OC� T iS�EET; IOTA AYJ 07 Ven 118 -.2/17.5 4 198 qE--. C ., 1-22-90 °L­r_ --F -O­_' C-TE H. HSU __36606 civi- -1 Type (Z) Type (D EP EP 10' MIN 1 2' 2­4' —12- ------- 10- 12• 2% & VAR- VAP. —SHOULDER BACK! NG ------------------------------- - -- ----- - ---- ZVI" ---- I W-.,, ---- 1=117 ---- I-Azz, It 's -17 - ---- 4��N 7 COLD PLANE 0.15' & PLACE A.C. L EXISTING P.C.C. OVERLAY TO MATCH EXIST. GRADE (SEE NOTE 7 VK2 EXISTING A.C. ---1 4 TYPICAL LEFT TURN POCKET AT INTERSECTION R/W R/W R/W LONG POST R/W METAL BEAM EP 60' GUARD RAIL L ype TYPE TYPE Q-,_1 F_ 0 ETW T `E (D ETW TYPEO U3 I TIf___TYPE CONCRETE WALL 4' 12, 12, I q, i q. VAl'- EP ETW E7W EP 2'; 1 — 41 27 & VAR.; 2% VAR, 4' 12' 1 10, 12' 1 2' 9, BUS 2" I STOP FAD —SHOULDER SACKING -------- /Z ------ - -- --------- ----------------------- -------- - SHOULDER VAR. 5% A. C. 16, 'SHOULDER BACKING1 SHOULDER BACKING-, 2% & VAR. --- --------------------- - LJ L�7. jk L ------ ------ �7! EXISTING EXISTING P.C.C. 16, CONCRETE DITCH LINING EXiSTING A.C. L EXISTING P.C.C. TYPICAL LONG POST METAL BEAM GUARDRAILING EXISTING A.C. 177-25 196-50 TA. (I �70-90 TO STA. T-049;�17 TYPICAL SCHOOL BUS STOP PAD WiS T A. TO STA.Qa T -0.5 V WITH LEFT TURN POCKET ' (FOR A.C.BACKING SEE L-I!.L-i2 & L-131 STA. 221.89 TO STA. 222.29 V REVISED FOR ADDENDUM NO. 1, DATED APRIL 20, 1990 (SEE L-15) TYPICAL CROSS SECTIONS V2 REVISED FOR ADDENDUM 140.2, DATED APRIL 24, 1990 NO -SCALE X-3 ,O 0C-lx-•2._ I.E.. 31", FOR REDUCED PLANS 0 1 OW,INAL SCALE tS iN axics I I I Cu 07203 EA !L'1 IS t.INDEA � DAECTI 3N AND ODNTRDL ION THIS DATE IN SN:Rl."TO. CALWORNIA �I-WANT To C AUTHORLZAT�ON aY THE DIRECT2f OF TiANS M D ° r bii m , G W W K V' W W Q �m m W 7z Y 52 W J W Q W S U ° U ►- 01 b Z JI cal Cb 0 NOTE. FOR TYPICAL SECTiON NOTES SEE SHEET X -1 50' A. C. & VAR 100' -- ---------------------------------- ----- -- ---- -- ---------------------------------- ---- -- ----- 0.20' A.C. OVERLAY EXIST. A.C. EXIST- P.C.C. PAVEMENT TRANSITION STA. 751.50 TO STA_ 752.50 R/W EP CE 1 16-49' R/W EP EP P; w 50' 10 - --I 8' 2' I 4' 0 L PLANE 20' PRF_I 0.15' MIN. f 1 I -- SHOULDER BACKING -• I 2'A & VAR. 1 12% & VAR.— ' =REMOVE EXIST. A.C_ & 0.. I- PLACE 0.60 A_ C. 0­8'. . 60Th 5: DES EXIST. A.C_ _J SEE NOTE � V\v'/ L- EXIST. 16' P-,'.,. CORE GABBERT RD. (EAST) TO MAUREEN LN. STA. 774.75 TO STA. 780.60 EP R /IY E T =O. 5' T =0.2' TO 0.5` --� 4 TW I 4 L ' 2' 12' 7' - 10' 12' E-} 32' & VAR. I 1 I iSHOULDER BACKING 2X & VAR. COLD PLANE I I 2% & VAR. — 0.15' MIN. A.C. 0VERLAY 16' GX 1ST. I.C.C. CORE EXIST. A. C. BUTTER CREEK RD. (WEST) TO MIRA SOL DR. (WEST) STA. 74600 TO STA. 751-50 R/W EP I I W 1 � r o raw OC- OE- 112-Ir 111E V. )i111 75'TO 98' & 25' -49' _1_ 8' I 12' COLD PLANE 20' PRF 0.15' MIN. -TYP.1 2% & VAR. C---7/fitl 17,1 -- -- ------- EXIST. A.C. EXIST. I Z C EP R/W I I jjj1 10' 1 j 0.2' A.C. OVERLAY 6' P.C.C. CORE -I L- o,-8, BOTHSIDES SEE NOTE .t 5 MIRA SOL DR. (WEST) TO GABBERT RD. (EAST) STA.752.50 TO STA.774.75 i B E v A R/W EP THIS PORTION WILL BE COMPLETED BY OTHERS )-ST[ CCJJ TY i QOj7E 071 Ven Ii8 -ec yr =eo -22 -9G I ?OST MLES TOTAL DTAL F.E. r NO_ SEEETS j 2.2/17.5 5 98 P H. H n; Uu! ORe ,'C r RjES I)ENr 1vO ! DArF fN -R _ 49 EP R/W 16' 10^ PRF dd i I i i - -- VAR_ t'12 & VAR. - -- --- -- --- ---- ---I -- ----- -- --- -- -- --- --- - -3 - -- - -- :cam--- ��:,- -- - - 16' EXIST. P.C.C_ CORE J REMOVE EXIST. A.C. 5 PLACE 0.8' A.C. TO MATCH EXIST. E AS BUILT PLANS L COLD PLANE 0.25' & PLACE 0.25' A.C. Contract NQ --"- - AQ 3 y9y TO MATCH EXIST. GRADE. Date Completed y- 30 - 9/ MAUREEN LN. TO G I SLER CT. (EAST) Document No. STA. 780.60 TO STA. 809.751 * MATCH EXIST. A.C. RIGHT SIDE FROM STA. 807.25 TO STA. 809.751 R/W EP rE EP R/W L NO CONSTRUCTION THIS PORTION I 40-49' NORTH SIDE f•10' PRF 1PRF , VAR. Ii 2% 8 VAR. -- ---- L__� -��-- y,,�c�---i/.h�-- -%.fit- ---�- ---- -- ---- -- --- - --- ----- --- --- -� --- _. 0'-8' COLD PLANE 0.21' AND 16' EXIST. P.C.0 CORE I SEE NOTE ;r PLACE 0.20'A.C_ OVERLAY i $ 1 TO MATCH.. E,.IST. GRADE. L— REMOVE EXIST. A.C. & REPLACE 0.6" A.C. GISLER CT. (EAST) TO MOORPARK AVE. STA. 809.75_ TO STA. 821.90- SOUTH SIDE PORTION ONLY TYP1CA1 CROSS T REVISED FOR ADDENDUM NO.1, DATED APRIL 20, 1990 NO SCALE SECTIONS X-4 FOR REDUCED PLANS O t 2 3 aRtGMAt SCALE IS IN tNC14E$ i i 1 1 ICU 07203 EA 103491 2,9 X 1 1-135. CENTIfYTHAT.. iEATAUSANOACCURATECOPYOf THE ACOIFN�TANT — UNDER MY aRECTN)N ANO CONTROE DN 7.11$ DATE IN SACP OF NTO CALIFORNIA .IIRN� Y RSUANt TO ACTHOR1ZAtION er THE DIRECTOR Of tRA ' 'O ATION 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I C _ D Z v � 1 ' y ,. �1 3. gy x :� .yy 9'. ti � ����•'�i-� � �t i 4 � �5�� �I�I J `_ "- �\ rr. dj y y k i r I k f .✓ __, ;k_ k '):j , ,1� �.tl �" �_,.+,, 'F I' -� •^ .F' .1'i � yR� -��..— Li 1 � '.1 �iF, IN �� �-- ¢ • � '^��� b 1 � ,. - 5.� �� � A":"' -' ^�r a t. - •� T.:, �� � mss:. �� � �� �` f ft y r J- �Al v 5 '` F'. ^�` Tom' ,p_ ^.pL \��l �_ -} ♦ �, I�r' f �� -, 3 t. � v as _ 5 -9 �-e" ,� [ � � • � �W 1 { �i � � t_�. 4 i 1. t„ r � St om ML AZY : _ Ate-. - �.�r. -ftf.. .+.... ��e. .- /rrr•• .�� ji } x f ..., { .;yY �`�'� �� .. - 4 4w• �1 F� } t < <� ra II a f . c. . b �, i � �1 �� �' • r ,x uF L.._ ^ 1,4 a114•dl .'�d, A � ��i�a�1 4�51)j �•R e1i�s!'��tl�� i. I i i� � .�iT ri � - �1i- i'��'� s - `...f lu• y� 3�$F 'R rr i'r>(a 3Alasih�i }sti � srr.,.�,_ �;._ - —� @ c z , i, O a k"111) I �r •z:, ��I. 1 . ` � tk �� ::i s 6�t 3�_ Z ;4� � i Y rj�lj_$ �� �� ` � k „ f yy gj �. �...�, - ""- �- �t"v.- - a, 'k• � ,� i .' a!' R � , i• �.,.;�.A a�..� :. 1� �a..f �';. �•r.a, w; ' "� � � a x �t .. . r `_ ' b� �. i ,:. �� `i. •xp `� ' � i � �� _ � III jo �� ` rt ., "� i ' a� ;� � p . I, l •. +n " tai , E "+ rE 7 n k '� ',• A!'1i' _ �., Q Aas a , , �'�'' �!+" �* A -.� ..� ,." ., � tit r •It''�} �' VEN 118 PM 14.99 Awl r _C tA Af y .,�y°'...x.`�*1a -c _��.c' �•�` *5���� _. n,r„nr:za� ,;+�,.,.�,.,n,.,,s,,,; y�� f� .Xs ". ... v. Q' '�`..'�sa "'°' �p «., _ .,w, «fv3..•. - .rA'a�n+:+i+�tw..._ ,w...r'i "- � _ N �p ,S, ,`...,> $ \ • due• � �;` ) yR 3}} 1R Q ww t? J •. -.. p cl ' ^ "IN Al ' 4 \ x 5t j' •.�f - ,�x. :sue== '�.^..3w�.�- �.a__•�.. �r �t�� y1 <c•.. � _ � 2 'Y��� '< It 4> h sir.. c r � f T y l 4 s- a �i 7r7 ' 1 Via, �r ' tea _ �.. 71 4-1 VEN 118 PM 14.511 4 , x ; • C sw s i vi ) tt• oc i s� � a d c w -- r "�W^ _ � .. ..m�C .i1NC�P' s ��- w�'`.'e.k�4n3. v'�d4 � ✓_�'^•`�x «YK , � ,W,}YNI�`ti!'St } P r, s � t a 4S �� • f �� .l t4:� W.. ��. +..,ice `� 7s•.;�*� �" � ,,.� � .. M t tom` J. ern -- � :::fir^ r� � 'i 3.,"$;� �.� P - .,'S«.Ek.,Etm. aee,C#:rN.�+.P�aa"&�ce L'.+w !~ .,.. ;..:`.'rdrr�.�• .,nerMS— �:.,.,.+2�. _ WIT lit ir V w �r+'�y .Ff ,� -•ate.. ,e.«�a9 ^,' h r -�," - r d .. .. x AI I�! . �.. r,..�. I •.. C y' 7.1t I �_ tea., r �✓3 �`� 3�- 'r 2 �. +ylr AA .7[ti7 olf Ir Al ski y?7 -fG n K� 4 �/ • yr 'i+ -„'"' .yam. \ �, , o - � - - a�s� Pt � i '.'_'q„' Y �i� �� }� f "tee r "'� '� � �• i �a �; JI iz I I �i t � �� lit � 2��a,c.:4�` _> � .,* ;t`,• � ".� ' APW f C. 1 � • �U14,11 ,<� t ,C ._. i g � i fSSf t h . ➢ I i3t ..11. J� t ' � `'r r s � - e 4 _;r � >v;r.. �r'. "� � t�f'f��l��tt .lC�..t`�,l �,l It lt'I #. Y' -•r t.�s �✓ _ �\ .'m t rr, r '7 Nab �,It•J {� � �Q1'T'��"� �f: of �{ -`( a °� 7 Lx 1T 1k ><(.� 4 '� ty yi�ttr �•altr�'t(r lt�n11 r i rte trriY4 f� 111 a a�' � r��" �15 �. a y 1 '?'Y1T�C1'T7't fYi ,yy X f 4 � � �t I�tf], ttr eclY rt?Y itt,l� iat f �� � ;.413 a - S �prr �� t S(ft rt rtvrrjtl jl F„l i�y � f��t J � i'ttilt ,rr�,�ttt YiCt iX titl+ I�� 1����2.1 t44 r:� rx t t t rr 1(u rt,t e5t i t? t�ru�t t �r3 fir e',+ r a sa�1 i .t d i tl I Tlit, � � J Y 4 ±�( (kr y �7���rjj �°p�, �.yf��y ^•/dam, � {1y ) �{. N y l Uzi b� � zi ". 1` t fs��16! .its.i`3na • -�� ¢p [[ X33; t �" t�. trrA ,`1 �1C. s.'h �1 (aY'�. r r� 1 i �•i i -1 �. ti 9e dj I 1�, �' ¢ � t�� P�`� �N. ,i � �� -� i f �_'1 �^�� •t�5�" } � � • ���^ � � � � ' ; �{� Y 1 3 � 1 i 6 � f� l ;� 11� t�; }�R 5 ��j�' � � �i� � nt f� � • •i€ � �.; d 3` � � E� e Ft'. � S E,tA � �5��. 1� t� ,� �* � a eae rt !Y 5t }4 � IN i ;1;, fi, r •r F r ' d -,t1' ' p'a.'`" r�r+- `r.+'4�+^.•.t+ °rt'�+c -/tv N- w -r+� -f�� „y . � �Y.r• • T +Y 1 C31 `� a � gin,, •" •t, a' i {$3t3$ a; cry `�f �yy��� ptjjf fdr`(j�/� } }}} �Q� \h e� Haar' 1r S� 4� i Q rh Pt � i '.'_'q„' Y �i� �� }� f "tee r "'� '� � �• i �a �; JI iz I I �i t � �� lit � 2��a,c.:4�` _> � .,* ;t`,• � ".� ' APW f C. 1 � • �U14,11 ,<� t ,C ._. i g � i fSSf t h . ➢ I i3t ..11. J� t ' � `'r r s � - e 4 _;r � >v;r.. �r'. "� � t�f'f��l��tt .lC�..t`�,l �,l It lt'I #. Y' -•r t.�s �✓ _ �\ .'m t rr, r '7 Nab �,It•J {� � �Q1'T'��"� �f: of �{ -`( a °� 7 Lx 1T 1k ><(.� 4 '� ty yi�ttr �•altr�'t(r lt�n11 r i rte trriY4 f� 111 a a�' � r��" �15 �. a y 1 '?'Y1T�C1'T7't fYi ,yy X f 4 � � �t I�tf], ttr eclY rt?Y itt,l� iat f �� � ;.413 a - S �prr �� t S(ft rt rtvrrjtl jl F„l i�y � f��t J � i'ttilt ,rr�,�ttt YiCt iX titl+ I�� 1����2.1 t44 r:� rx t t t rr 1(u rt,t e5t i t? t�ru�t t �r3 fir e',+ r a sa�1 i .t d i tl I Tlit, � � J Y 4 ±�( (kr y �7���rjj �°p�, �.yf��y ^•/dam, � {1y ) �{. N y l Uzi b� � zi ". 1` t fs��16! .its.i`3na • -�� ¢p [[ X33; t �" t�. trrA ,`1 �1C. s.'h �1 (aY'�. r r� 1 i �•i i -1 �. ti 9e dj I 1�, �' ¢ � t�� P�`� �N. ,i � �� -� i f �_'1 �^�� •t�5�" } � � • ���^ � � � � ' ; �{� Y 1 3 � 1 i 6 � f� l ;� 11� t�; }�R 5 ��j�' � � �i� � nt f� � • •i€ � �.; d 3` � � E� e Ft'. � S E,tA � �5��. 1� t� ,� �* � a eae rt !Y 5t }4 � IN i ;1;, fi, r •r F r ' d -,t1' ' p'a.'`" r�r+- `r.+'4�+^.•.t+ °rt'�+c -/tv N- w -r+� -f�� „y . � �Y.r• • T +Y 9L'Z 1907 WH q, dr L �_� Ara Iq 1a c k lk Wit j, " ; , •��,i- .'.: �� r -_ '� "ice � �: v'�' }} x • -'_� � "--- , if 1 9l y >4 :_ pp u. r �g $' '1Y e n T- a- e LAI a 3 H H l `rte � � � ��� u� �� � , - ,r, � �! 1' .Kra 'k'� :�.• � � a � ±y: � Al U 44 r r E' t $i r v, 4i -` 19IdiY191yitIY ; @Y3 �a r "��`� �- ' Sti f w r � �5 a* ��_ 5 � ° � ? �4� +� '"� a*�,��y� � �'�� mar. ♦ ". .� ..�: i �. .,. _ _ ... s . - . _ ,gym � ... ,. E;•. r < �.�*. _. 1 . v s�irc �'r`�F �+ .,r •� ..� `yg �, • e 7fi. 4. �s rt _`' s'Pir' a� � 'k r+."`�+. �� ...���a.�� ~' d iyt� 4 }Ir� a�a• - ...�Y...`. >w;a. � �.`5`�tP,'� �,�,• �, < «4 O, +.�,�1q�,,'.,rt Y ' �QY 'Yf Vjs., +..'►. r`•""„+,y„''''�� €: ' <�i �'.� .. � 4 <t��.��.: �Y � {j �! b4i���,�yr4 ` • K'�.. ":ice ;/, } " � i �'e w.n.��Y��K1.�[ -°wry ��•a �i. ,h— . , ..� y K!� '�` L+1 H, 4..i �9' l a. �•. h .�( '- >M..i.,�w....,...4"4 """e -ro-� .'�.,"'�'�"«.., �} , ".a 3 4.9� .i✓' k'� + �( +i....Yy�.��'i +,ate ��=n ,,f.� <ta Zlff r.,._ ■ � 3a. "` a✓.... c�' �c' vJ '°�'l. °'..v..w- +.- .'- <.^.i+.�" t �,r• +4,►Y^}-µ+14+1 +J 1 ^�' yt �'kr4••S 4 � A i s i � •fv"'�.0 n x y ;t�: ,i 3 s R ttixt fiQa -,J T ii Gc 3( +4 p gcit; 1�� •} li i 4 G �tt�47 �4 4.�_�� v fS�ti�`^t - ���' ..,fit •+'_ `� f,���;��+,i�? �� •� I r�+d ! b € t� �,S`k � �� {.� �it} I i � '� I ��i"� f �,' . '•'�!f�,,, .. r.o ��f�l1 � %� + g -' � ,�1 `, � ac�'I I � �` s:% I �.;,� I'i} r tt.h {z ...� 1R Sr` i° �, �.. 1 ¢ 'r � •� G � 1 ;�' .�ti a +hF Er•% S�ITy. :'�T ..,� `�� s , � �,r bt *'� '{ L"' a,` l �'°d"r'� S _� Mri ^Ff�� �7., sue.- ..,w^y.` g - b .� ,+ J''��i <_ "� 7 � � ?�, } �4 max n._ � � ' "`"'a!r' -,•�� li! � �� I N YF , l F I f -, J .Cr Ir /// � f s• .. L u 1L F `"_M. iT i/• S � ..t� l S1 A'r�"`�.<�' i •,.1" ` ,w .� � � plc 'i i,A.. i .-. .. - — +ar-+ y S ' Ra' 4i S v iN i t wi+• .' 'fit s, E _`T` "7 >�+'•` � r, � .� � ti.,,t, � .1 r' w F W. ,���' �: t, gg a '� - a� �� kt a_i 4r.91•��b r41�✓. e e y P ' {e s i� • - - t.�.. r t�T�t1`e T�Vj''•�? P 5r4d !~i i� r'=- 4 � ti®'t `.'.`.... ,� � t � �� � 1 °r r .rt �h « - ♦♦ k b{•f('�Y�T4,�j +ri ♦�? R t i.t� y,ye `T S� {t . .�('� .i- hlc#� 4 J gd ij}A � Vi 4 •�r } YfN � s � {•.� V>�Y� P ti � k•1 A4+ t�-- I , 4,; .Z 44 . •.:I s.p .. � +� ( t f -! v MY- s- dgR;m+ -1 �.r- �r.t,,�''"�y- .,.��.i -•'ry - ._ {`"'y4*ky 9"'� { � .•�' ,,.... n •�t':; t *♦ d � 6�r{r. +L +� {q-' yo �.•'�- f�- "�.�," (*gyp ;1',.y.,., ;�a- i.r. }... s2"c __ .� �, 7p �r � =' v. +w+ -+9� 9.4�*. yJ� r»4 •ilia �r -1.�yY �n.•.�4Po 1.A.Mf4 a,w. I , z E,r� _ r?? ,_i j7'Tur° T '^^Y'�3Y3,„•v+i+ u•. �,r s; yk... -. y..�, %�•7••.»+..,, ,r,. sy. it •� -. ' >`^'^' 6 d w `t._i�r. i.�r H:. rA«.:t M'"4k sr ,wpeb+ rye• + r4 _ JJ L' w itdcG �, qq,,- H? �'S't' i i+are-r:+.+•aitfey�4i A�K.l N.y ..ti i1...-1t,1.+ K HY�+ .+ .V,, ! .. '1 R 8 A ��,s y �P r r{. 4 . � e�M.�� {i �^T y�y . r J�.1'J�.4� w:4.�+H�i «�±•ti �p � l < 1n � •y .� � : � Y +. � M :.rM.y 'f: , '.'i7^i' ^t � !" l� ~_... Y T' .' Sc •.i. a� "? ; �* a ,.. S � � '31i r r�- ,. t _ 2at ,4` :' ? � ., (. �k'r��'.� 'id."tR rr- �. '�a•dy�r•- .•?Yid , '-1 y... ° •> y�' '�i, lilt' �4�•r�,.Y'y/,�.°ea�a'r..ne. Yt• �,.:,...«r w°.. i :«w ' � �' ��� ... t t � ,, � �. � • � � t 1 to Pv +`� .. s-p w+-b a �,�+, *^^Gr<t x�pw. ar t,�« r+a1�y �i`� Fw -iti,. h u'd c 2 _ - _ 'v'. '�'.,ye••.°' tW �r^rr.. + �.. �. ���. �. �, �rtm, �•!• r.,. r „+iw•+,e�y+v.:.Y^++:w.dak.*s•.. ..� �`�' �� � j �`A .,.; 3' � _- - � — R.` j 'Sw -o•' s+i. ""r'._ �k- `e�'s'°h'��• ±: '- ,tk:.. "`'. �T `"”' °�_ 'k,� > :.;;•� �' �2`' •"J- -'�', Via+ � ; r'_ i � �i �:.� -.• +•w..r._ra• -!�. [+rsw.,..•r+� ��µv�+• <m0 ,aw� _ J :�" yy i�T ti } �, • � � 4 7 Y � aF � -r•f•4i . �iaw: � ,. O _� .�.._. __::.._. ��. n -:.. .>• � i � 't�•v c _ �^�i'• �r*,^ ri�4 -�• ����xa, a`� na � f ��.b,.a. }... -MreM1' , -d•F 1. �' ' � -t. �. • .R + �_: I C' [[�, g.�� . e 5 �•e l.f•i H^Y.'4. -rvri �j.,. k'.5,?Y+ lyi. � _• � yar -.... mow' ,_.: .__ � t i ,'°}"k" «` 4�f° � p +' +eel f��o- k., � Y� +�•f- s•�+Fa.t� '�'"� -a e,'N -o.. .: �,� � r .. - E' c�,- 4.t^s-t� 4.�1�{ '. i rn y,�9� +.•�4+ -�Sr^ �.•a� r0•- abc`4`.d,. ,^'-t HS•.. e ,q^ya r,.v 1 7 n, � 5,�,".�•4tWv�•v' ir..�.a- .r•E�•ek'�� 4a� M "d.Iw `+-tee � :N.y.�t,r .-r;�� ,o; ��. �'. � P\ F ].Ou. � '��.`r.;r a'•a _ J E i; r • 1 `,'�`'�,c`� . S L � y y _ 1�- _ °«'roc*'"+ f +�•„l. r. < C ,� i �� _ � j.L � f � yS.� ,•! '4,r '(� f F J3 e.0 A � �'� k f�' �d i '� 0. li .,f .l'.. 44. 1'Y�4 ,q..•Ii�['�___.g Ny4a"..' }f �! r 4 r �iU W,` r .,ke ° _ "� �, `za'^z, .v q"S i5 '' ,�,;� t ;r4 TC'{'?, .. d' }.s "•n'} -x•fi ::e �, y'' f' t (g} }� s 1'2`S •° ij a + i 4 ' Iv a 44,1,511 n icy '� /�,_ �t 7 1 c• g `� '"„y' ��"� ,fr` �� V�p Y �� -�:�� ,; •r- ���4��vyyb -.�' •' � ��; � �r � #� f::it� •� 3E fit,• � ;��`t'�".� � �e �F. .. � P� °G pyx� -• i' E �� s ".�a Via. 3 iL w be ! n Zffi � F.J. � � ..�' � v; ��-�? ? t�` �.�" -t :'.� .}! !t' iSk �..Y 1 •��. sT- � S'r'i � •,� e 4 Y� J ./ )� � � of � • as �, 0 c ?� F'' �. ? "x y.. 'b r • MY .' many., HOW S lots? - v - A_ • ___ •_ -•` _ '- -�� _ -- M 1........�is'T'� I.` U's.�,.. �.X a X Y r ?, l ✓st`- �F ' ` � +' � T $-� '> ti- -4 '"`", -. r`r �'r � i' ��_d � c`{ : $ ,i F '�}` 1.�_ • �-ti Ors � Y < + < .� ++ ,f o> H.. a-,r- � t .,s, ` ' � . +' � �„ .. bs � , �• �-^ -�-' rr ��i i- .A_ !,-n. `r .d.'y b � -- �S. . c._ 4�. 11^� ✓+E,t y�-�+- t i ,.- 'fix Z-< ♦' �S- G- 'l. _y 4 j•'S ' 11ioi sue} -...a- fe-4— ` :X3 s1 . ' .� ,i ';5;yfi §s' �'.�.�5-''r -. . a i l r Why + � � � �' �.�.�.q�yyAA 4N-L -r ,•v,y o•� s �- �AXJ,� { � tl f. �' 1 1 { .�. S.i ` -�� A. .by'!r `J P � L. �+� ,y._� 4:- t 4 1' « .., {)L. }'S^ t�1X � �1 4_' a'' `ivD `:�'..�. +.4 R.. �- ,5,a �'-s•.y yy }-y.9 0 4 �F1 �s }y. �L }�ti iy' "?..�.�" *,A.�. b t;�•g P { s:r$ Sb�i + S '� .arm -,�dL •�; A 4�kk".'.:kk4 �4�d Wass kY' gt�,* � �41j ..7 4� -d°.'_ �i` ,'y�,ad � � y°, 4-fa��� +i}fy }144b�4�i �i4'>•. � �� "y f'''1,, � � �- .i�. d - �'i��p �� «'7Q}t...'ty` � � P31 "�i% 44 i t tk4iz r�:✓�'',G��..`. `.'l'. +ati h'r i4 %1 ,'.'1'� =� � '° +-' < "ma�y'� _ +•-1. .c.,,.. r * : w -. w:e:,yv -4 s ti X'. i4S-.' . �!M^+�g,+° 1 � }y5 . y -,� �� �' ":+- _ `, a'. `"� r ; , ,i i a♦' t <. e �" ' ? a S" + �� �4 ; t ' ; S a > i r. i' F ' } ` , j s' ;ti^. { ♦S ipd_`.�ti )� _.� ., i.:l .ti <�,-. esd5 y>� +.aa i Ce 44�ii9�i 4A4ry {�)4d• - 4 p t10Z[ 4�e� }d,P -s ^^TT44'D� j11 y{ 4 (-9 ♦q 0 ♦Y ♦jggyy >y 4 P � { �14y Mat t �a? ^ ~�4h^N�i,+ia �4�5.i `a> 1,99t4�1 :heeal ♦i♦ lSi T'�4 )�,�i'i S��54i '� i 4ir <4 �r �4 ♦ ♦yp}y� {Ohe i y z. -;a'r �. +" w4 - �i++Ye .<%< 44 }�d4i1 4 4 �.• {' 9 ♦ ,� �y 64 I t i+ txixti k Z�.Yro4a,�4 ;�,� ry ar R J y}( R e, "r rS� 1 .,.��}�� r� X���k7'.+�ek� }�-kr 2 #rt {:Z °��t'si•. .i�{� #� {��Z}p�� � ,�Si���jj� ���4�z � td�i �i'�2 i.j z�4�� i��� g��4�? � k � iia p '�'tr�'�(�� [ -✓ .Z, > _ 4-.i - 1 }j}� D ffy < ti '. 4'Oj!5 �3 j t.� ppt b c D 'Z G &> &> ,fir tti a -,^.ji `;:, ,ls •z, 4 -,. !' fit T+ '� k�{ y.{ do- ,e {�a { °` +% LM +�({. y g 5 ♦y+ 7 T }Jjy }77jt 44444 T q} y1 ♦¢ + 9p` {` j { ♦ {j }(y }j �+$ S � ¢j }t. �"Pi Y Y ♦� yy ` � � A �S4 }¢ 9 a t 1 d"M J ty r 3 4yyf3� p �§ 'a 111 'a�) :�s , I< j X [:C p .. .4 s�k` � id e�F� �44 i f$ ANNA `y. a2 Z {i7t� t aR >> j $ : (2( ] /jjj�YjJv[ yi, y$y j ` {, jjj( j }} ,( {( « ♦i (j6 ry f1 }} ( t` S q {) L y { {¢q¢ .`S 11 jj((T ilYb4"i `]t] }%9 iiv 5' 5 034A Ai iii 4i; )��� "�' i.• b Ry �4� � VMS& .s i5) 4 2 "4�Ri,{ r3,jt s iC lyp hhh :t1 2�as TY�? 1j1 }4y }n Zi S {1"D 14 4 sf 44 F�. l�t � 2 t jti, ipiai} t� �3ii'�{ �.:h��.��,° y" S$ 3�x`�t �� TY a. � d��r xy stff 'S � q aft a � 1 !' °e7 �, s. p y � r �- `: :�ti� `4 i }.yi �ti y � +� ` ��1 !°°�'iff'T`°i" hum m"m S � f � WAMPUM; � �}'$Df5¢1ti¢j�y,1��{ i "L�y���yf8dT.`�. zS�. })))))) (( p jj{ ff } }( {t }$��� 4(A `�. ���¢R. Y4sigg¢�}4 �.�`i "3 {��55y� 444itk}} d�3S�f4eiYit `Sb4;�a� {as44St;riiY4i ±Z�Ibiw }'' i f 4 i it vl RNH)41 -IH-1 III i ,­,i - ;,Le11t j E) } e � 5 d v.� � � !' 4 ) a S 9 4 , _ �(7 e 'r-- °^^ °v7.....-^+•a'�,..'';t.o✓ � w� yw: Mi ci,� �3t3 is ft. g igy t a� i ! 1 A�> � a��dt tlt� . , }} t} y _, � �dl t 1 . '3 1i t . d. , 1F..,,�....e�i -e,r� •�}r; •^t-, •S` � . �* • S � f � F � 't 1 , DD I xYb e � '. : �.., g � °h� p1. �" � ,t�. ' .^�,...f ,.. . n s fw.. a• �.I�.4 . a e d i � ',., p ��r: .:.. .,:�.am.... --._ ..r,,•c+- FV:nn+rs.a'e.R+r�i'.S _,�i �'D w�� x � ��`t .: ,An+a .,°a �,�o.a•. ; �rs�l -Cs «t� �� s eg^.'°' /, ._{ �i ...... �.t.- +.t....��F.. � ��.��r�`• .... '�a°�` .ewe + � e.:e,�SU� to- it S - INwF.AP•• �Z�iFeyy��(�,�.n.dvdYrd•i 9� -{�i M sr' ,.-c. � a-b aao- �a�y.^ice. �_ / ^+ . + . -;.i.+ -.ni 4 d +tea. • J ±•R->3•... a }k.yr+3^ ' . S k t s�L ��..iS �.1 !.. � yr .. s•..c•>. A� 4a.. e� q� ..o-.'�. ,r, i >. «+IrN+. F i ;'a iJ"t tWS..d.4P Oar +tcJd +ae y� �&@ '"r e •a.�p� -♦ ,% .no-��^ -[ Y a- ���i ° +,raa•h:�: - +7.. st+a+.s.a ,,ft '( ! .t -4� '•,'-a ,^c `*a v- -°4h�t �'3'w'•O.da ¢ °d -a.= ,xo,•,^ .�r s v^ s �- y� P \ i.: ^t-P•sd.W;.a- N- e,w- �^M.n� .i.•�.,- q.3 .-F� -.F� ,�se�v '- .'+a n «� .n.t•G ^59.4 t � i^' J �,-} vss 3 X/I , - %- ?.+`fi<+'m�.4 -h 4�- .C^.�..r• ,a. }.caay.`wv..� f o-y- .w ^i-M ,map+ � ' / � E[ �gy fi..y,5^ t .w- .+.1. e.F-t a �{ f svA;, s ; r•i -Fa+. r+-td kx �� �� �.� o. • �;•! � g� -- r.�r..•.,.1�.. -t a -� �r s y`y �cR. �c t •�c r-� �k a�v�+W Y, ,-g< x �� ?�+ "-^ x«... c._.. rr. �+• u;. ..uaiw.- ;......na.,r�..�v.,�..r .. � -• bi nS- .t-++ L ry ' ?-, t'«YCo.ai, -n+?e b. _ �vta.,ve MAk 1` t;,. ° ,.dM•s..c,e..rf'^�wa,c`.�wa..m. amei ��w•?�rrs. -.s wt ail '�l! r.° vr,rnPr:m�".•raa?*re• „�.� t.,, ss4 c���„`,��o..�rc+.as,�,; `s,"+""",'0t�'o ,FR _ c+�•>�t -..,.. s9u+'9m4 ,^S �FOS -.-ar: ^Tip' .c �.;.`'.?; I y ass aoW `'�'t'°'�'?"$' tf � awn :�.. =�r.P. ay qq•.: _ -„e vm^ao - v&xe1Wi. _� xs+ued*x• .rars�N4!t+�F•� a P r W W 9 F, S t T RA "1 .A j 1 3 Or A�-1�1! Umag V,7;�,`, 1 ZA i 51M, , z 17, ! 77 j 1 3 Or A�-1�1! Umag V,7;�,`, 1 Ill TI I �y il'I I t' N c II {I +t 3 7, Q. I I IIY lull YGII III `;�I It MGM Q I 1 ^ I I.I I I III I ' I III II' +III �� III III , I I4� I`' I 111 11 I'ii!I) II III VIII 'iI IIII IIIIIIIII!, III III II vc'�,'Yfi 3,..✓ -.. a � I . • I I ' II I ! i VIII s,�, se�-3 �� a.>" �-- � �„� II n` I, II 11� rt:ip,x _� I, I IIII - ,._ I III I .� IIII;!' 11111' I'Ii('I IIII LI'�I IIII 111111 Il -.III' IIII !11111 I °-`" �. IIII Ililp l (IUIIII,a IuII iIl � III IIIIIIIII II'.IIIIIII iIII I II!IIIIiII I' 1i, I' �^x �...' --•-� _ - rg # IIIIIII'I I I'I'IIh III .I tl it I VIII i I II�IIII III. I'III�IIII p,l IIII I, � I II y.: �'— - -.. I1 I','I II II Flip, I - aI' I l I — - ya II IIII IIII II 'III lI VIII lI I l - - I jI II I —� I II I I 'INI �hll I 11,1[40 , I Ir IIII I'll I I II I IIII I I ,I' I I � I 1 II III' III 111 i I I' �iII I � 'n ', 4ll I I I'I IIIIII I LII III it II II I I II II I II , IL III I I I - _ _ — IIII I Illijllll III+ IIII III II 7111 I VIII; 11 �I I i.- ,. �, -.•..� _ y I�IiII it 11.!', IIII ",III'll' IIII I�II�IIIIIIII!Ilillllll '�I I ._ .�� - a • .y I I IIII I I I I I I III, IIIIIIIII I II II I I 1 j ...: , I , li III II IIII I .. II II 11111 LjI I No P-Mms � LIII i,l 1 , IIII I'll III 'I III I III II 11 IIII' . VIII III h!!I I I I - � I I I,. IIr' t I'II III IIII III III 111111 I I II - r,IIllll,IIIII, ',I'I II,IL1III.I 1'11111;1, I I Ilrll'II III jllll - _ _ ? �I11Ih1 I .'�I IILIII�I1 VIII IIII III,II IIII 'III I III III II Ilil!I 1 — � -. ''IIIIIII'I 1 j..I II I III 1111111 IIII 11!1,111 I! , I'ili I, I,, I IIII ,IIIIII!I�„ It = _` �.. __. _ - II I I I II 11 .III , I iIL III I I, III I IIII I ,:I�,IIII IIIIIIIII !,:':I I I 11{IIIIiI'!� I'1 I VIII III lil I IIII (IIII I I II IIII III I 1 1111111 III IIII II i 'l'111I1 I I,I I I4 = - Vim_.... I _.,�, , -.., y' Iil hill I;', ° II�11111111 I' Il�p IiI11111III,l, IIII III '.Ij IIII � ^_ I _ I III IIII 11 .VIII IIII IIII IIh I I .. snV ry n v s a P am? . AIIIIII '_ .M,. .ems- a.xca° -`� s,y2�t3° : •,. •r�ozw+acz;s,..;,, SS°"s �r4g tit y S tk b+ tY r } ,.��� 7f r�- IS9�c-a.64.bN.e- a+- �Y�i!4 v rrr `% ,.mkH1.4A -t+-A a'a.an� N o .s a�s.a.a �A -trab; i. ya '• $ �'� � f �,km{.j;d� LE d b s�, 4-<. aLSa f S- '� ar ^�i �. Q +� -♦41 ei o-�r,,sa ��bsw so-, -. �� 31,�'�_ ec ,.- �„ �M '- � 'LaN� -4bb kF�+re►62.aA -ty _ ',jam' Appendix B Air Study on SR 118 Moorpark Air Quality Study MOORPARK AIR QUALITY STUDY INTRODUCTION Segments of California State Highway 118 were analyzed for concentrations of particulate matter greater than 10 microns (PMto) and for carbon monoxide (CO) from truck traffic emissions. The segments analyzed included a portion of the Highway near the city of Somis and a segment through portions of the city of Moorpark. The calculations were based upon the latest traffic information available from CalTrans. The computer model ISCST3 was used to predict the ground level concentrations. The results were then compared to the current ambient air quality data in the area. EXISTING AMBIENT AIR QUALITY The current ambient air quality was examined in order to evaluate the effect of emissions from truck traffic in the Moorpark area. Table 1 displays the highest measurements recorded in the last three years (2000 -2002) at the two closest air monitoring sites. These data were taken from the California Air Resources Board's (CARB) website. These concentrations constitute the ambient air quality for the area. Table 1 Maximum Ambient Air Quality Concentrations Monitoring Site Ozone Ozone PMI0 PMIo CO CO NO2 NO2 1 -Hour 8 -Hour 24 hour Annual 1 -hour 8 -hour 24 -hour Annual (PPM) (PPM) Avg. Avg. Avg. Avg. Avg. Avg. (µ M3) (µ M3) (PPM) ( m) ( m) ( m) Thousand Oaks — 0.116 0.096 99.5 31.0 NM NM 0.093 0.016 Moorpark Road Simi Valley — 0.129 0.113 78.0 31.0 6.0 4.29 0.095 0.020 Cochran Street NM — Not Monitored Sulfur dioxide (S02) and hydrogen sulfide (H2S) are not monitored at either site. The area is designated non - attainment for ozone with regard to the federal standards. It is attainment or unclassified (same as attainment for planning purposes) for all other federal ambient air quality standards. For state standards the area is classified as non - attainment for ozone and PMto. For all other pollutants the area is considered attainment. 1 Moorpark Air Quality Study METHODOLOGY As previously mentioned, the computer model ISCST3 was used to predict the ambient concentrations of PMjo and CO from truck traffic on California Highway 118. Various inputs are required for the model. To obtain coordinates for the sources (i.e. trucks), segments of applicable portions of Highway 118 were plotted. Traffic data from CalTrans were used to determine the volume of trucks traveling on those applicable portions of the Highway. The computer model, EMFAC2002, was used to determine the emission factors of the trucks at various speeds (0 to 65 mph). The following tables summarize the data input for each of the models. Table 2 Input for Computer Model ISCST3 Input Parameter Data Obtained Source Type Volume Release Height of Emissions 12 feet Source Locations Coordinates from Topographical Ma Source Emissions Rates Based on results from EMFAC2002, number of vehicles and segment length Sigma Y Values Based on meteorological data and width of highway — 2 lanes of 12 feet and 2 shoulders of 6 feet Sigma Z Values Based on height of emissions from truck exhaust — 12 feet Hours of Vehicle Operation 6am to lOpm Receptor Locations Based on possible residential locations and school location — assumed residences located at edge of Highway Meteorological Data Worst -case screening data Table 3 Input Parameters for EMFAC2002 Input Parameter Input Geographic Location County County Ventura Calendar Year 2003 Season or Month Summer Model Year of Vehicles 1965 through 2003 Temperature 65T Relative Humidity 30% Speed 0 to 65 mph at 5 mph intervals 4 Moorpark Air Quality Study Tables 4 presents the emission factors obtained from EMFAC. Table 5 presents the maximum predicted 1 -hour PMIo and CO ground level concentrations. Table 4 Emission Factors from EMFAC Pollutant Speed (mph) Concentration (grams/mile) PMIo 0 2.057 PMIo 5 0.976 PMIo 10 0.765 PMIo 15 0.612 PMIo 20 0.502 PMIo 25 0.42 PMIo 30 0.36 PMIo 35 0.315 PMIo 40 0.282 PMIo 45 0.259 PMIo 50 0.242 PMIo 55 0.232 PMIo 60 0.227 PMIo 65 0.227 CO 0 22.697 CO 5 36.838 CO 10 24.756 CO 15 17.533 CO 20 13.085 CO 25 10.289 CO 30 8.524 CO 35 7.441 CO 40 6.844 CO 45 6.633 CO 50 6.776 CO 55 7.298 CO 60 8.288 CO 65 9.929 3 Moorpark Air Quality Stud Table 5 Maximum Concentrations Predicted from ISCST3 Location PMI0 CO PAO 1 -Hour 1— Hour Annual ( m3) ( /M3) Moorpark 1.71 53.73 Somis 4.51 141.39 RESULTS Table 5 above provides the maximum 1 -hour predicted concentrations for PMIo and CO using the worst -case meteorological screening data. In order determine the maximum ground level concentration for different averaging periods; these 1 -hour values are multiplied by adjustment factors. For the 8 -hour average the factor is 0.7, for the 24 -hour average the factor is 0.3 and for the annual average the factor is 0.1. The use of these adjustment factors is consistent with regulatory guidance. Since the model output for PM10 is already in micrograms per cubic meter (µg/m3), the results can be directly compared with the current ambient air concentrations. However, since the model output for CO is in µg/m3, the results need to be converted to parts per million (ppm) for comparison to current ambient air quality conditions. The equation for this conversion is: C(,ug/m3) — ppm x molecular weight (I o3 ) 24.5 Where: C equals the concentration. The molecular weight for CO is 28 grams /gram -mole. Table 6 compares predicted concentrations to current ambient air quality conditions. Table 6 Comparison of Predicted Concentrations to Maximum Monitored Ambient Conditions Location PMIO Monitored PAO Maximum Annual PMIO Maximum Monitored Avera a Annual Monitored Ambient (µg/m Averar 24 -Hour PMIO ( m) ( m3) ( m3) Moorpark 0.171 31 0.513 99.5 Somis 0.451 31 1.353 99.5 L, Moorpark Air Quality Study Table 6 (Continued) Comparison of Predicts Concentrations to Maximum Monitored Ambient Conditions Location Predicted Maximum Predicted Max ambient CO 1 -hour CO 8 -hour 1 -Hour Ambient 8 -Hour Monitored (ppm) Concentration (ppm) Concentration (ppm) (ppm) Moorpark 0.047 6.0 0.033 4.29 ppm Somis 0.124 6.0 0.087 4.29 ppm As Table 6 indicates, the PMIO and CO concentrations resulting from the truck traffic on State Route 118 are very low compared to the measured ambient air quality data. The predicted concentrations are less than 2.1% of the measured ambient air quality concentrations. This limited evaluation suggests that the truck traffic on California Highway 118 near Moorpark is not significantly contributing to negative air quality. REFERENCES 1. Traffic data- www. dot. ca. gov /hq/ traffops / saferesr / trafdata /2001all /docs /rtII8133.htm 2. 3 -D TopoQuads, 1999. DeLorme. California South. Version 1.3- 1.2- R5.069.303e 3. Emfac2002, 2002. California Air Resources Board. Version 2.2 4. ISC- AERMOD View, 2002. Lakes Environmental. Version 3.5.1 5. Ambient Air Quality — California Air Resources Board website — www.arb.ca.gov z APPENDIX A CALTRANS TRUCK DATA CALTRANS TRAFFIC DATA HIGHWAY 118 2001 Mile Post Description Back Ahead Peak Hr Peak Mo AADT Peak Hr Peak Mo AADT 2.2 Junction Route 232, Vineyard Avenue 4000 39000 37000 2100 21800 20800 4.16 Santa Clara Avenue 2100 21800 20800 1600 15000 14400 10.92 Somis, Junction Route 34 South, Somis Road 1200 12900 11900 1700 18500 17500 14.69 Grimes Canyon Road 1700 18500 17500 1700 18700 17900 17.42 West Junction Route 23, Moorpark Avenue North of Route 118 1700 18700 17900 3200 35000 33500 17.91 East Junction Route 23 at Spring Road 3200 35000 33500 19.71 Milepost Equation Moorpark, Junction Route 23 Freeway 7200 72000 68000 APPENDIX B EMFAC2002 OUTPUT FILE MOORPARK EMFAC2002 OUTPUT Title : Ventura County Avg 2003 Annual Default Title Version : Emfac2002 V2.2 Sept 23 2002 Run Date : 04/09/03 08:48:32 Scen Year: 2003 -- Model Years: 1965 to 2003 Season : Summer Area : Ventura County Year: 2003 -- Model Years 1965 to 2003 Inclusive - Summer Emfac2002 Emission Factors: V2.2 Sept 23 2002 County Average Ventura Count County Average Table 1: Running Exhaust Emissions (grams /mile; grams /idle -hour) Pollutant Name: Carbon Monoxide Temperature: 65F Relative Humidity: 30% Speed HHD HHD HHD HHD MPH NCAT CAT DSL ALL 0 0 0 26.3 22.697 5 1765.772 167.174 11.824 36.838 10 1174.789 111.223 8.153 24.756 15 825.793 78.182 5.884 17.533 20 613.294 58.063 4.443 13.085 25 481.229 45.56 3.512 10.289 30 398.953 37.771 2.905 8.524 35 349.444 33.084 2.515 7.441 40 323.385 30.616 2.278 6.844 45 316.19 29.935 2.16 6.633 50 326.635 30.924 2.143 6.776 55 356.503 33.752 2.226 7.298 60 411.103 38.921 2.419 8.288 65 500.869 47.42 2.752 9.929 Pollutant Name: PM10 Temperature: 65F Relative Humidity: 30% Speed HHD HHD HHD HHD MPH NCAT CAT DSL ALL 0 0 0 2.383 2.057 5 0.101 0.103 1.115 0.976 10 0.066 0.068 0.875 0.765 15 0.045 0.046 0.702 0.612 20 0.032 0.033 0.576 0.502 25 0.024 0.024 0.483 0.42 30 0.019 0.019 0.414 0.36 35 0.015 0.015 0.363 0.315 40 0.013 0.013 0.325 0.282 45 0.011 0.011 0.298 0.259 50 0.01 0.01 0.279 0.242 55 0.01 0.01 0.267 0.232 60 0.009 0.01 0.261 0.227 65 0.01 0.01 0.261 0.227 APPENDIX C EMISSION RATE CALCULATIONS On -Road Mobile Sources Emission Rate Computation SOMIS - PM10 Highway 118 Diesel Particulate Number of Sources 112 Link Length (meters) 3299.00 Volume /Baseline (VPH) 97.80 Toxic Mass Emission Rate (gr /mi) 0.222720 Emission Rate (gr /sec) _ ((Mass Emission Rate x Volume /Baseline) /(1609.3 m/mile) x (3600 sec /hr)) x (Link Length) Toxic Emission Rate (gr /sec) 1.24E -02 Toxic Emission Rate (gr /sec /source) 1.11 E -04 On -Road Mobile Sources Emission Rate Computation SOMIS - CARBON MONOXIDE Highway 118 Carbon Monoxide Number of Sources 112.00 Link Length (meters) 3299.00 Volume /Baseline (VPH) 97.80 Toxic Mass Emission Rate (gr /mi) 7.00608 Emission Rate (gr /sec) _ ((Mass Emission Rate x Volume /Baseline) /(1609.3 m/mile) x (3600 sec /hr)) x (Link Length) Toxic Emission Rate (gr /sec) 3.90E -01 Toxic Emission Rate (gr /sec /source) 3.48E -03 On -Road Mobile Sources Emission Rate Computation MOORPARK - PM10 Highway 118 Diesel Particulate Number of Sources 114.00 Link Length (meters) 3380.00 Volume /Baseline (VPH) 168.44 Toxic Mass Emission Rate (gr /mi) 0.22272 Emission Rate (gr /sec) _ ((Mass Emission Rate x Volume /Baseline) /(1609.3 m/mile) x (3600 sec /hr)) x (Link Length) Toxic Emission Rate (gr /sec) 2.19E -02 Toxic Emission Rate (gr /sec /source) 1.92E -04 On -Road Mobile Sources Emission Rate Computation MOORPARK -CARBON MONOXIDE Highway 118 Carbon Monoxide Number of Sources 114.00 Link Length (meters) 3380.00 Volume /Baseline (VPH) 168.44 Toxic Mass Emission Rate (gr /mi) 7.00608 Emission Rate (gr /sec) _ ((Mass Emission Rate x Volume /Baseline) /(1609.3 m/mile) x (3600 sec /hr)) x (Link Length) Toxic Emission Rate (gr /sec) 6.88E -01 Toxic Emission Rate (gr /sec /source) 6.04E -03 APPENDIX D ISCST3 OUTPUT FILES CO AND PM10 ** ISCST3 Input Produced by: ** ISC- AERMOD View Ver. 3.5.1 ** Lakes Environmental Software Inc. ** Date: 4/17/2003 ** File: C: \ISCView3 \MoorCO.INP ** ISC Control Pathway x+ CO STARTING TITLEONE Moorpark CO 1 hour MODELOPT DFAULT CONC NOCMPL URBAN AVERTIME 1 POLLUTID CO TERRHGTS FLAT RUNORNOT RUN CO FINISHED ** ISC Source Pathway SO STARTING ** Source Location ** ** Source ID - Type - X Coord. - Y Coord. ** LOCATION PMOR1 VOLUME 326817.000 3794495.000 LOCATION PMOR2 VOLUME 326786.000 3794496.000 LOCATION PMOR3 VOLUME 326756.000 3794496.000 LOCATION PMOR4 VOLUME 326726.000 3794496.000 LOCATION PMOR5 VOLUME 326696.000 3794497.000 LOCATION PMOR6 VOLUME 326666.000 3794498.000 LOCATION PMOR7 VOLUME 326639.000 3794497.000 LOCATION PMOR8 VOLUME 326607.000 3794499.000 LOCATION PMOR9 VOLUME 326579.000 3794502.000 LOCATION PMOR10 VOLUME 326549.000 3794502.000 LOCATION PMOR11 VOLUME 326518.000 3794501.000 LOCATION PMOR12 VOLUME 326486.000 3794501.000 LOCATION PMOR13 VOLUME 326459.000 3794505.000 LOCATION PMOR14 VOLUME 326433.000 3794505.000 LOCATION PMOR15 VOLUME 326404.000 3794506.000 LOCATION PMOR16 VOLUME 326376.000 3794504.000 LOCATION PMOR17 VOLUME 326347.000 3794506.000 LOCATION PMOR18 VOLUME 326323.000 3794507.000 LOCATION PMOR19 VOLUME 326296.000 3794508.000 LOCATION PMOR20 VOLUME 326264.000 3794509.000 LOCATION PMOR21 VOLUME 326236.000 3794511.000 LOCATION PMOR22 VOLUME 326204.000 3794511.000 LOCATION PMOR23 VOLUME 326174.000 3794511.000 LOCATION PMOR24 VOLUME 326144.000 3794513.000 LOCATION PMOR25 VOLUME 326113.000 3794513.000 LOCATION PMOR26 VOLUME 326084.000 3794513.000 LOCATION PMOR27 VOLUME 326057.000 3794514.000 LOCATION PMOR28 VOLUME 326027.000 3794514.000 LOCATION PMOR29 VOLUME 325996.000 3794516.000 LOCATION PMOR30 VOLUME 325966.000 3794516.000 LOCATION PMOR31 VOLUME 325939.000 3794517.000 LOCATION PMOR32 VOLUME 325906.000 3794516.000 LOCATION PMOR33 VOLUME 325876.000 3794517.000 LOCATION PMOR34 VOLUME 325847.000 3794517.000 LOCATION PMOR35 VOLUME 325816.000 3794516.000 LOCATION PMOR36 VOLUME 325788.000 3794516.000 LOCATION PMOR37 VOLUME 325758.000 3794518.000 LOCATION PMOR38 VOLUME 325724.000 3794519.000 LOCATION PMOR39 VOLUME 325693.000 3794518.000 LOCATION PMOR40 VOLUME 325666.000 3794518.000 LOCATION PMOR41 VOLUME 325635.000 3794520.000 LOCATION PMOR42 VOLUME 325603.000 3794520.000 LOCATION PMOR43 VOLUME 325575.000 3794519.000 LOCATION PMOR44 VOLUME 325544.000 3794520.000 LOCATION PMOR45 VOLUME 325513.000 3794518.000 LOCATION PMOR46 VOLUME 325485.000 3794519.000 LOCATION PMOR47 VOLUME 325455.000 3794519.000 Appendix C Reference Materials Truck Route Classifications CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (CALTRANS) TRAFFIC OPERATIONS PROGRAM OFFICE OF TRUCK SERVICES October 18, 2001 a& TRUCK ROUTE CLASSIFICATIONS Note: This fact sheet is subject to revision. Please check back at this web site for updates. INTRODUCTION Page 1 of 6 What is the purpose of this fact sheet? This fact sheet is an overview of truck route classifications in California. Its purpose is to enhance communication between Caltrans, the trucking industry and local governments regarding legal truck size. HISTORY How were the route classifications created? Route classifications developed out of a series of federal and State legislative acts, outlined below. Federal STAA: In 1982, the federal government passed the Surface Transportation Assistance Act (STAA). This act required states to allow larger trucks on the "National Network," which is comprised of the Interstate system plus the non - Interstate Federal -aid Primary System. "Larger trucks" includes (1) doubles with 28.5 -foot trailers, (2) singles with 48 -foot semi- trailers and unlimited kingpin -to -rear axle (KPRA) distance, (3) unlimited length for both vehicle combinations, and (3) widths up to 102 inches. AB 866: In 1983, California passed Assembly Bill (AB) 866 to implement the STAA provisions. AB 866 also increased the "California Legal" vehicle length from 60 to 65 feet and its width from 8.0 to 8.5 feet. Caltrans then evaluated State highways, and classified as "Terminal Access" those State highways with geometric standards high enough to accommodate STAA trucks. SB 2232: In 1986, California passed Senate Bill 2232 which increased the maximum KPRA length from 38 feet to 40 feet for trailers with two or more axles. SB 2232 also directed Caltrans to determine which State highways could not safely accommodate trucks with a 40 -foot KPRA length. In December 1989, Caltrans completed the report to the legislature, Truck Kingpin -To -Rear Axle Length State Highway System Evaluation. The report states that, of the 15,166 miles comprising the State Highway System, 3,364 miles cannot accommodate a 40 -foot KPRA length, and 3,185 miles cannot accommodate a 38 -foot KPRA length. Those route segments that cannot accommodate a 40- foot KPRA were designated "Advisory." (See section 'Route Classifications" for more information on Advisory Routes.) What is the STAA Network? The National Network (NN), Terminal Access (TA) and Service Access routes together make up the "STAA Network." These are the routes that allow STAA trucks. http: / /www. dot. ca. gov /hq /traffops /trucks /trucksize /fs- trkrouts.htm Vitt 1t7nnl Truck Route Classifications Page 2 of 6 What was the engineering basis for the classifications? Caltrans performed engineering analyses to classify State routes. The engineering analyses focused on a vehicle characteristic called offtracking. Offtracking is the tendency for rear tires to follow a shorter path than the front tires when turning. Offtracking is the primary concern with longer vehicles, because rear tires may clip street signs, or drive onto shoulders, walkways, or bike lanes, or cross the centerline on a curve, creating a safety hazard for adjacent and oncoming traffic. TRUCK SIZES What are the dimensions for the truck classifications? "California Legal" trucks must be no larger than 14 feet high, 102 inches wide and 40 feet long if a single vehicle, and 65 feet long if a combinaton vehicle. An overall length exception to 75 feet is given for truck tractor - semitrailer - trailer combinations (doubles) if each trailer is no more than 28 feet six inches long. Length requirements also depend on the route traveled, as discussed below in the section "Route Classifications." The four major truck size categories are: STAA Truck with Single Trailer: STAA Truck with Double Trailer: Semi - trailer = 48 feet maximum Semi - trailer = 28 feet 6 inches maximum KPRA* = no limit Trailer = 28 feet 6 inches maximum Combination length = no limit KPRA = no limit -OR- Combination length = no limit Semi- trailer = over 48 feet, but 53 feet -OR- maximum Either trailer or semi - trailer = 28 feet, 6 KPRA = 40 feet max inches maximum; the other trailer has no Combination length = no limit limit *KPRA = kingpin -to -rear -axle distance "California Legal" Truck with Single Trailer: "California Legal" Truck with Double Trailer: Semi - trailer = no limit Semi - trailer = 28 feet 6 inches maximum KPRA = 40 feet maximum (if 2 axles in rear) Trailer = 28 feet 6 inches maximum KPRA = 38 feet maximum (if 1 axle in rear) KPRA = no limit Combination length = 65 feet maximum Combination length = 75 feet maximum -OR- Either trailer or semi - trailer = 28 feet, 6 inches maximum; the other trailer has no limit KPRA = no limit Combination length = 65 feet maximum http: / /www. dot. ca. gov /hq /traffops/ trucks /trucksize /fs- trkrouts.htm 2/13/2003 Truck Route Classifications Page 3 of 6 ROUTE CLASSIFICATIONS Which routes can trucks use? All federal and State highways are assigned route classifications. STAA trucks are limited to the National Network, Terminal Access routes, and Service Access routes (STAA Network). "California Legal" trucks can use the STAA Network and California Legal routes. The route classifications in California are listed below. National Network (Federal): The National Network (NN) is primarily comprised of the National System of Interstate and Defense Highways, for example I- 10,1 -5, and I -80. STAA trucks are allowed on the NN. Terminal Access (State Local): Terminal Access (TA) routes are portions of State routes, or local roads, that can accommodate STAA trucks. TA routes allow STAA trucks to (1) travel between NN routes, (2) reach a truck's operating facility, or (3) reach a facility where freight originates, terminates, or is handled in the transportation process. Terminal Access Signing: A Terminal Access symbol sign is posted in advance of the ramp or intersection to an authorized TA route. This information sign ( #G66 -56) is white -on -blue with the letter "T" on the back of a truck. For information on signing TA routes, see the Caltrans Traffic Manual at: www.dot.ca. og v/hq /traffops /signtech /signdel /trafman htm select "Chapter 4 "; go to section 4- 04.15, Item 13; STAA Trucks, et al. Sign # G66 -56 Service Access (State Local): STAA trucks may exit the National Network to access those highways which provide reasonable access to terminals and facilities for purposes limited to fuel, food, lodging, and repair, when that access is consistent with safe operation. The facility must be within one road mile of an exit from the National Network and that exit must be identified by signage. Service Access Signing: A Service Access symbol sign is displayed on the NN route in advance of the ramp or intersection of an authorized service access road. This information sign ( #G66 -55) is white -on -blue with the letter "S" on the back of a truck. For more information on signing service routes, see the Caltrans web site mentioned above. Go to the "Services" section. Sign # G66 -55 http: / /www.dot.ca.gov /hq /traffops/ trucks /trucksize /fs- trkrouts.htm 2/13/2003 Truck Route Classifications Page 4 of 6 California Legal (Stateh. California Legal routes are State routes that allow California Legal -size trucks. STAA trucks are not allowed on these routes because of limiting geometries, such as sharp curves and/or lack of turn - around space. California Legal - Advisory (State): California law allows regulatory prohibition of a 38 -foot KPRA or greater where posted in black -on- white. However, many California Legal routes cannot safely accommodate California Legal -size trucks with a KPRA less then 38 feet, due to limiting geometries such as sharp turns and highway width. Although California Legal trucks may travel on these segments, the driver is still legally responsible for unsafe offtracking, such as crossing the centerline or driving on shoulders, curbs and sidewalks. California Legal - Advisory Signing: "Advisory" route segments are posted with black -on- yellow warning signs as shown on left. TRACTOR - SEMIS OVER, FEET KINGPIN TO REAR AXLE NOT ADVISED Restricted (Federal, State Locals Some route segments have restrictions on certain trucks or loads, such as gross weight, number of axles or hauling of flammable materials or explosives. Restrictions on federal or State routes are listed on the Caltrans Truck Route List at: http: / /www.dot.ca.gov /hq /traffops /trucks /trucksize /truckmap . For vehicles complying with the restrictions (for example, vehicles not carrying explosives), the route classification, in most cases, reverts back to that of the adjacent route segments. What about local roads? Local roads governed by cities or counties that allow STAA trucks are posted with the Caltrans TA sign. If a STAA truck needs to travel off the NN and TA routes, the driver may want to contact the city and/or county public works department in advance to determine which roads are available. Are any local maps available? Sacramento County has a map showing STAA routes in their jurisdiction. You may order that map by calling Caltrans staff listed at the end of this fact sheet. As additional local maps become available, they will be listed here in future versions of this fact sheet. Can I request that a route classification be changed? Caltrans classified all State routes in 1989 with an engineering analysis. However, improvement projects may change the highway geometries and may justify a new evaluation. Also, local governments may evaluate roads under their jurisdiction to consider allowing STAA trucks. For application guidelines and further discussion, request the fact sheet "Terminal Access Application Procedures" by calling Caltrans Headquarters at (916) 654 -5741. CALIFORNIA VEHICLE CODE http: / /www.dot.ca.gov /hq /traffops /trucks /trucksize /fs- trkrouts.htm 2/13/2003 Truck Route Classifications Page 5 of 6 Where can I read more of California law? Legal requirements for vehicles are included in the California Vehicle Code (CVC). The CVC can be accessed on the Internet by two methods: 1. To view the CVC, start at the site www.leginfo.ca.gov and click on the [California Law] button. To view the Vehicle Code, check the box by "Vehicle Code" and click on the [Search] button. For length requirements, scroll down and click on sections 35400- 35414. 2. To search the CVC, follow the same steps, but type in a key word before clicking on the [Search] button. TRUCK NETWORK MAP Caltrans' Office of Truck Services provides a statewide truck network map showing federal and State routes. Each route segment is color -coded by classification. The 2000 version has just been released, and is available as a hard copy on the back of the new California Highway Patrol map. How may I obtain the map? You may order the 2000 Truck Networks maps by contacting the Caltrans Publication Distribution Unit at 1900 Royal Oaks Drive, Sacramento, CA 95915 -3800, or by phone at (916) 445 -3520, or by fax at (916) 324 -8997 (when faxing, include credit card information, or a phone number where the credit card information can be obtained). Maps cost $2 for shipping and handling. Is the map on the Internet? The new 2000 map will be on the Internet. The 1998 map can be viewed or downloaded at: http://www.dot.ca.gov/hq/traffops/ti-ucks/tnicksize/truckmap/. However, for the most up -to -date route information, please refer to the September 2000 Truck Networks map with the latest "map update" sheets, and/or contact the Caltrans staff listed at the end of this fact sheet. Are the route classifications also available on a list? Yes. The "Truck Network Route List" includes each route segment with beginning and ending locations. This list is available on the web page "California Truck Network Map" described directly above. Or you may request a copy from the Caltrans staff listed below. ORGANIZATIONS The following trade organizations may be good sources of information and networking: California Trucking Association 3251 Beacon Blvd West Sacramento, CA 95691 (916) 373 -3500 Web site: www.caltrux.org CALTRANS CONTACTS American Trucking Associations 2200 Mill Road Alexandria, VA 22314 -4677 (703) 838 -1700 Web site: www.trucking.org For more information on truck size and routes, contact Caltrans staff in the Office of Truck Services, http: / /www. dot. ca. gov /hq /traffops/ trucks /trucksize /fs- trkrouts.htm ?/1 1/9001 Truck Route Classifications Truck Size Branch at their general number (916) 654 -5741, or . Casey Robb casey--robb@dot.ca.gov (916) 651 -6125, or . Manuel Fonseca manuel_fonseca @do_t.ca.gov (916) 653 -2017, or • Steven W. Sowers, P.E. steve sowers@dot.ca.gov (916) 654 -6914. Return to the Caltrans "Legal Truck Size and Weight„ page. Page 6 of 6 http: / /www. dot. ca. gov /hq /traffops/ trucks /trucksize /fs- trkrouts.htm 2/13/2003 Truck Restriction Procedures CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (CALTRANS) DIVISION of TRAFFIC OPERATIONS OFFICE OF TRUCK SERVICES October 30, 2002 I TRUCK RESTRICTION PROCEDURES Note: This fact sheet is subject to revision. Please revisit this web site for updates. INTRODUCTION Page 1 of 8 What is the purpose of this fact sheet? This fact sheet is an overview of the procedures for a local agency applying for a truck restriction on a State route. Its purpose is to enhance communication between Caltrans, the trucking industry, local governments, and the public regarding the restriction of trucks on State highways. Is truck restriction an easy process? No. Most truck ban requests arise from noise complaints. Overland trucking is the primary means of moving goods in the United States. Commerce and trade have state and federal legal protection, therefore restriction of commerce is difficult. It requires substantial supporting evidence such as accident data and a reasonable alternate route. BACKGROUND -- LEGAL TRUCKS What size trucks are legal in California? The California Vehicle Code (CVC) limits height to 14 feet and width to 8.5 feet. The basic length limit for all single unit vehicles is 40 feet; however, length exceptions are given for buses up to 45 feet on certain routes (see the Caltrans fact sheet 45 -Foot Buses). Combination vehicles coupled together, such as a truck tractor and semi- trailer, or a truck tractor, semi - trailer and trailer, are limited to 65 feet, 75 feet, or may be unlimited depending on the route. In addition, legal trucks in California must Dot exceed a kingpin -to- rear -axle (KPRA) length of 40 feet. Truck lengths and routes are discussed in detail in the Caltrans fact sheet Truck Route Classifications. What are the maximum weight limits? The maximum overall weight limit is 80,000 pounds. The CVC also specifies maximum axle weight limits as well. Generally, the maximum allowable weights are 20,000 pounds on single axles and 34,000 pounds on tandem axles equipped with the proper tire weight capacity ratings. BACKGROUND -- CURRENT STATE ROUTE RESTRICTIONS What restrictions are in place now? There are approximately 23 state route segments with specific truck restrictions. These restrictions involve the number of axles, gross weight, length, and cargo type (flammables, explosives, radioactive materials). Restrictions can be viewed on the Internet as part of the larger truck route classification list, called the "Truck Route List." (To view the list on -line, click here for Routes 1 -99, or Routes 101 -980.) The restricted segments have an "R" in the column "Type - Des." The "Comments" columns describes the restriction. http: / /www. dot.ca.gov /hq /traffops/ trucks /trucksize /fs- restrict.htm 2/13/2003 Truck Restriction Procedures Page 2 of 8 BACKGROUND -- PAST APPLICATIONS The history of two relatively recent successful applications is summarized as follows: 1987: Route 152, Hecker Pass, 45' Length Limit: Hecker Pass is a 9.6 -mile stretch of Route 152 between Watsonville and Gilroy. In 1968, signs were installed recommending that trucks use Route 129 instead of Route 152. In 1978, County of Santa Cruz Public Works Department, after receiving approval from the Santa Cruz County Board of Supervisors, requested that Caltrans District 4 conduct a study to restrict trucks. The truck study was completed in 1979; the study recommended against a restriction at that time because construction on Route 129 was causing an abnormally high traffic volume on Route 152. The Santa Cruz County Transportation Commission began a new effort in 1985 with a public hearing, and developed model ordinances. In 1986, Santa Clara County held a public hearing, and each county adopted a resolution or ordinance to ban truck- trailer combinations over 45 feet in length along Hecker Pass. The cities of Gilroy, Morgan Hill, and Watsonville also adopted resolutions supporting this restriction. A 1986 report published supporting data, including the limited roadway width and winding alignment, truck- involved accidents, and the alternate route available (Route 129). 1997: Route 175, Hopland Grade, 39' Length Limit: Hopland Grade is a 12 -mile segment of Route 175 between Routes 101 and 29. Correspondence requesting the removal of large vehicles from Hopland grade dates back to 1979. In 1989, Caltrans analyzed the geometrics on that route segment and designated it as "California Legal - Advisory" suitable for trucks with a kingpin -to -rear- axle (KPRA) length less than 30 feet; however, due to federal legislation, California Legal trucks with 40 -foot KPRAs could still legally use the route. The restriction process officially began in 1993 when the California Highway Patrol (CHP) requested the prohibition of large vehicles from that segment of Route 175. Later that year, Caltrans District 1 completed a Route Study. In 1996, Caltrans District 1 completed an environmental study called "Initial Study for Truck Restriction of Vehicles with 4+ Axles." In 1996, Lake County held a public hearing, and in 1997, both the Board of Supervisors in Lake County and in Mendocino County approved resolutions supporting this restriction. The Caltrans Director approved the request, and in 1998, a 39 -foot vehicle length limit was imposed. CURRENT RESTRICTIONS The current special restrictions on State routes are: BEGIN CO II PM 77 i opanga Canyon Blvd. END CO PM T DESCRIPTION 10.23 Las Posas INo through trucks with 4 or more Rd. axles. http: / /www. dot. ca. gov /hq /traffops/ trucks /trucksize /fs- restnct.htm 2/13/2003 N. Jct 246 via Central 20.56 H St. in SB 22.07 Ave. in No trucks over 3 tons. Lompoc Lompoc http: / /www. dot. ca. gov /hq /traffops/ trucks /trucksize /fs- restnct.htm 2/13/2003 Truck Restriction Procedures Page 3 of 8 http: / /www. dot. ca. gov /hq /traffops/ trucks /trucksize /fs- restrict.htm 2/13/2003 No vehicles transporting hazardous 20 LAK 8.34 Jct 29 LAK 31.62 Jct 53 materials / waste due to adjacent waters. Transport of explosives, Begin End flammables, liquified petroleum 24 ALA 5.89 Caldecott CC 0.35 Caldecott gas or poisonous gas in a tank Tunnel Tunnel truck, trailer or semitrailer allowed I I only 3 am -5 am. _JI Nash Rd. at Santa Ana 25 SBT 50.74 San Benito St. SBT 51.45 Rd. in No trucks over 3 tons. in Hollister Hollister Campus 30 SBD 0.71 Benson Ave. SBD 3.65 Ave. in No commercial trucks over 5 tons. Upland Upland Toll gates at No flammables / corrosives or 75 SD 20.28 Coronado Bay SD 22.26 Jct 5 explosives on Coronado Bay Bridge Bridge. End of 8th / 0.25 miles 5th St. east of Bay No flammable tank vehicles or 80 SF 4.92 Viaduct in San ALA 2.20 Bridge toll explosives. Francisco plaza Baseline Rd. / 83 SBD 13.46 16th St. in SBD 14.19 Ect:30:] No commercial trucks over 5 tons. Upland Trucks restricted from transporting 84 ALA 10.83 Rte 238 / ALA 17.99 Rte 680 hazardous materials / waste due to Mission Rd. adjacent drinking water source. No trucks over 9,000 pounds gross vehicle weight. Road maintenance 85 SCL 0.00 Jct 101 SCL 18.45 Rte 280 and emergency vehicles, buses, and RVs allowed. No trucks over 6,000 lbs gross 110 LA 23.73 Glenarm St. Jct 101 LA 31.91 vehicle weight unless making pick in Pasadena ups or deliveries. Carlton Rd. Watsonville No trucks or combinations over 45 152 SCR 3.69 near SCL 5.03 Rd. near feet in length. Watsonville Gilroy Rte 101 in No hazardous materials / waste 154 SB 8.11 Rte 246 SB 32.28 Santa except pickup and delivery. Barbara Turning movement restriction. Trucks can't use the on -ramp from Rte 170 to northbound Rte 101. Trucks that want to go northbound on 101 from 170 must 170 LA 10.69 use a detour. From northbound 170, take a right on Odin St. Follow Odin to Cahuenga Blvd. Take a left on Cahuenga and follow it to the northbound 101 on -ramp. Guide signs are posted. http: / /www. dot. ca. gov /hq /traffops/ trucks /trucksize /fs- restrict.htm 2/13/2003 Truck Restriction Procedures Page 4 of 8 LEGAL BASIS What is the legal basis for the restriction process? CVC Section 21101 allows the restriction of certain vehicles, by stating that, "Local authorities... may adopt rules and regulations by ordinance or resolution... (c) Prohibiting the use of particular highways by certain vehicles..." CVC Section 21104 further states "...an ordinance or resolution which is submitted to the Department of Transportation ... in complete draft form for approval ... is effective as to any state highway..." Section 35701 allows restriction of vehicle weight, by stating that, "(a) Any city, or county for a residence district, may, by ordinance, prohibit the use of a street by any... vehicle exceeding a maximum gross weight limit ... (b) The ordinance shall not be effective until ... signs are erected ... (c) No ordinance... shall apply to any state highway ... in the National System of Interstate and Defense Highways, except (that) approved by a two - thirds vote of the California Transportation Commission." Section 35702 requires Caltrans approval, and the designation of an alternate route, by stating that, "No ordinance proposed under Section 35701 is effective with respect to any ... state highway, until the ordinance has been submitted by the ... local authority to, and approved in writing by, the Department of Transportation. ...the local authority shall designate... an alternate route..." Section 35703 allows deliveries and pickups: "No ordinance... shall prohibit any commercial vehicles coming from an unrestricted street ... for the purpose of making pickups or deliveries..." What is the legal basis for restrictions on crossings? Section 23334 authorizes Caltrans to restrict traffic on vehicular crossings by stating, "The Department of Transportation may adopt rules and regulations... for the control of traffic on any vehicular crossing to aid and insure the safe and orderly flow of traffic, and shall, so far as practicable, notify the public of the rules and regulations by signs on the vehicular crossing." Section 23330 states that "Except where a special permit has been obtained... none of the following shall be permitted on any vehicular crossing: ... (d) Vehicles carrying items prohibited by regulations promulgated by the Department of Transportation. Are certain crossings mentioned in the CVC? Yes. The Caldecott Tunnel, which connects Oakland http: / /www. dot. ca. gov /hq /traffops /trucks /trucksize /fs- restrict.htm 2/13/2003 N. Jet Rte 175 MEN 5.40 5.4 miles east LAK 8.19 29 north of No vehicles over 39 feet. of Rte 101 Kelseyville No trucks over 7 tons allowed 183 MON 9.00 Jet 156 MON 9.98 Jet 1 SOUTHBOUND only. [246] SB 8.30 Lompoc City Limits SB 9.55 W. Jet Rte No trucks over 3 tons. Trucks restricted from transporting HALA 0.62 Central Ave. ALA 1.92 Jet 880 hazardous materials / waste due to in Alameda adjacent drinking water source. Foothill Blvd. Grand Ave. No trucks over 4.5 tons except HHHLeandro in San ALA 43.61 in Oakland buses. LEGAL BASIS What is the legal basis for the restriction process? CVC Section 21101 allows the restriction of certain vehicles, by stating that, "Local authorities... may adopt rules and regulations by ordinance or resolution... (c) Prohibiting the use of particular highways by certain vehicles..." CVC Section 21104 further states "...an ordinance or resolution which is submitted to the Department of Transportation ... in complete draft form for approval ... is effective as to any state highway..." Section 35701 allows restriction of vehicle weight, by stating that, "(a) Any city, or county for a residence district, may, by ordinance, prohibit the use of a street by any... vehicle exceeding a maximum gross weight limit ... (b) The ordinance shall not be effective until ... signs are erected ... (c) No ordinance... shall apply to any state highway ... in the National System of Interstate and Defense Highways, except (that) approved by a two - thirds vote of the California Transportation Commission." Section 35702 requires Caltrans approval, and the designation of an alternate route, by stating that, "No ordinance proposed under Section 35701 is effective with respect to any ... state highway, until the ordinance has been submitted by the ... local authority to, and approved in writing by, the Department of Transportation. ...the local authority shall designate... an alternate route..." Section 35703 allows deliveries and pickups: "No ordinance... shall prohibit any commercial vehicles coming from an unrestricted street ... for the purpose of making pickups or deliveries..." What is the legal basis for restrictions on crossings? Section 23334 authorizes Caltrans to restrict traffic on vehicular crossings by stating, "The Department of Transportation may adopt rules and regulations... for the control of traffic on any vehicular crossing to aid and insure the safe and orderly flow of traffic, and shall, so far as practicable, notify the public of the rules and regulations by signs on the vehicular crossing." Section 23330 states that "Except where a special permit has been obtained... none of the following shall be permitted on any vehicular crossing: ... (d) Vehicles carrying items prohibited by regulations promulgated by the Department of Transportation. Are certain crossings mentioned in the CVC? Yes. The Caldecott Tunnel, which connects Oakland http: / /www. dot. ca. gov /hq /traffops /trucks /trucksize /fs- restrict.htm 2/13/2003 Truck Restriction Procedures Page 5 of 8 with Contra Costa County; is restricted by CVC Section 31301, which states that, "(a) No person shall transport any explosive substance, flammable liquid, liquefied petroleum gas or poisonous gas in a tank truck, trailer, or semitrailer through the Caldecott Tunnel ... Route 24 ... at any time other than between the hours of 3 a.m. to 5 a.m. What is a "vehicular crossing "? Section 23254 defines "vehicular crossing" as "any toll bridge or toll highway crossing and the approaches thereto, constructed or acquired by the Department of Transportation under the provisions of the California Toll Bridge Authority Act." Are other restrictions mentioned in the CVC? Yes, Route 85. Section 35722 states that, "...the County of Santa Clara may, after a public hearing, adopt a proposed ordinance imposing a maximum gross truck weight limit of 9,000 pounds on Route 85 ... and submit the proposed ordinance to the Department of Transportation for approval. If the proposed ordinance is approved ... the Department shall post appropriate signs..." Where can I read the CVC? You can access the CVC on the Internet at www.leginfo.ca.gov. Select the link "California Law," click the box by "Vehicle Code," and select "Search." If you do not have access to the Internet, call Caltrans staff listed at the end of this fact sheet. TRUCK RESTRICTION PROCESS The following suggested procedures are in accordance with CVC Sections 21101, 35701, 35702 and their related sections. 1. Local Agency Prepares a Draft Truck Restriction Ordinance or Resolution. The local agency prepares a draft ordinance or resolution of the proposed truck restriction and informs the appropriate Caltrans district office. The ordinance or resolution must cite the CVC Section providing the justification for the truck restriction. Caltrans districts should notify the Headquarters Office of Truck Services (see Caltrans Contacts at end of these guidelines) in writing as soon as possible after learning of a truck restriction proposal. Districts should request and forward copies of local agencies' draft ordinances or resolutions to Headquarters Office of Truck Services, Legal and Environmental Programs for review. 2. Local Agency Prepares Initial Study. The initial study provides the information necessary to justify the proposed restriction, and may also indicate if the proposed restriction is subject to California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) review. The initial study allows the preliminary submittal of information by Caltrans, local agencies, and California Highway Patrol staff, as well as initial comments from the trucking industry, affected industries, and citizen groups. It should include the proposed restriction type, location, existing conditions, alternatives, maintenance and safety considerations on the alternative route(s), any initial public comment, and conditions that may involve further CEQA compliance. 3. Local Agency Provides Public Review and Comment Period. During the public review period, the local agency gives public notice of the proposed truck restriction, and public hearings can be advertised and held. All documentation acquired to date regarding the proposed truck restriction should be available for public review prior to the public hearing. 4. Local Agency Receives Comments and Prepares Final Truck Restriction Report. The http: / /www. dot. ca. gov /hq /traffops/ trucks /trucksize /fs- restrict.htm 2/13/2003 Truck Restriction Procedures Page 6 of 8 local agency considers all comments received. If the local agency still wants to proceed with the proposed restriction, a final truck restriction report is prepared and forwarded to the Caltrans district office. This final report includes any comment revisions, and the draft restriction ordinance or resolution. The Caltrans District Director forwards the report with the District's recommendations to the Caltrans Traffic Operations Program Manager at Headquarters. (See the checklist for the contents of the truck restriction report, following these guidelines.) 5. Caltrans Traffic Operations Submits Recommendation to the Director's Office. The Traffic Operations, Office of Truck Services, in cooperation with Caltrans Headquarters Environmental and Legal Divisions, prepares a recommendation regarding the truck restriction and submits it to the Caltrans Director's Office. 6. Caltrans Director issues written approval. If approved, the Caltrans Director issues a written approval of the draft ordinance of resolution for the truck restriction. 7. Local Agency Passes Final Truck Restriction Ordinance or Resolution. 8. Local Agency Erects Restriction Signs, and Restriction is Enforced. TRUCK RESTRICTION REPORT CHECKLIST Approval of restriction requests is contingent upon a complete identification and documentation of impacts on highway safety, structural integrity, environment and operational efficiency. Some items may not apply. This checklist is a guide only. I. COVER The document cover clearly states the Caltrans District, County, Route and postmile limits of the proposal. Any proposed local ordinance or resolution number should also be placed on the cover. II. PROPOSAL STATEMENT The proposed restriction and references to specific codes, regulations and any local ordinances or resolutions are clearly presented in the proposal statement. If exemptions to general rules apply; cite appropriate statutory law or regulations. III. JUSTIFICATION FOR THE PROPOSAL Justification depends on rationale: safety, noise, hazardous materials, air quality, bridge weight limit, construction zones, seasonal operation, etc. Analyses of present and future safety, operational (capacity, geometrics) and/or structural adequacy supporting the restriction. A description of existing versus proposed conditions. Include supporting data tables, maps and/or photographs. Analysis of environmental considerations for the restriction proposal with an explanation of impacts and mitigation measures. Existing and future land use plans. Analysis of the impact on interstate and intrastate commerce. Analysis of the economic impact http: / /www. dot. ca. gov /hq /traffops /trucks /trucksize /fs- restrict.htm 2/13/2003 Truck Restriction Procedures on communities, shippers and trucking companies due to increased travel distances. Page 7 of 8 Analysis and recommendations of any alternative routes that can safely accommodate any California legal commercial motor vehicles and serve the proposed restriction area. Evidence of consultation with the local or adjoining state governments affected by the proposed restriction. Results of any public hearings. IV. APPENDICES Copies of any draft local restriction ordinances or resolutions. Copies of any supportive correspondence or documents for the restriction. Minutes of public hearings. (audio or videocassette tape) CALTRANS CONTACTS For questions regarding truck restriction procedures, contact the following Caltrans staff: District Truck Coordinators DIST NAME LOCATION PUBLIC PHONE E -MAIL �2 Dan Wing Rob Stinger Eureka Redding PF445-5875 IF (530) 225 -3229 dan wince @dot.ca.g - rob stinker @dot.ca.g, 3 4 Parviz Lashai EandAu -Yeung Sacramento Oakland (916) 859 -7978 (510) 286 -4613 parviz lashai_ @dot ca.g, r_oland a yeung @dot.ca.g 5 San Luis (805) 549 -3125 mikekeller @dot.ca.g, [f:Keller Obispo �6 7� 8 Joe Espinosa Steve Malkson Manuel Jabson Fresno IF(209) Los Angeles San 488 -4348 (323) 849 -5028 (909) 383 -6237 joe espinosa @dot.ca.g ste_v_en malkson@dot.ca.g manuel iabson @_dot.c- Bernardino Jerry Gabriel Bishop F(760) 872 -0650 jet gabriel@dot.cn.g- http: / /www. dot. ca. gov /hq /traffops /trucks /trucksize /fs- restrict.htm 2/13/2003 Truck Restriction Procedures Page 8 of 8 10 Alfred Blum Stockton (209) 942 -619 alfred blum__ @dot.ca.g 11 Hank Morris San Diego (619) 688 -6881 hank morris @dot.ca.g. [:E[Raouf Moussa Irvine (714) 724 -2912 raodmous_sa @dot.ca.g Headquarters Office of Truck Services, Truck Size and Weigh -in- Motion Branch General number: (916) 654 -5741 • Casey Robb at casey_robb @dot.ca.gov, or (916) 651 -6125 • Manuel Fonseca at manuel fonseca @dot.ca.gov_, or (916) 653 -2017 • Steve Sowers at stevesowers @dot.ca.gov, or (916) 654 -6914 Return to the Caltrans " Le ag 1 Truck Size and Weight" page. http: / /www. dot.ca.gov /hq /traffops/ trucks /trucksize /fs- restrict.htm 2/13/2003 AIR TOXICS "HOT SPOTS" (AB 2588) PUBLIC NOTIFICATION PROCEDURES Introduction The Air Toxics "Hot Spots" Information and Assessment Act of 1987 (AB 2588) was adopted by the California Legislature in response to increasing public concern about emissions of toxic chemicals to the air. Little information was available to assess the types or quantities or health impacts of toxic chemicals routinely released to the air in California. AB 2588 addresses only routine or predictable emissions, rather than emissions due to unpredictable or catastrophic conditions. Under AB 2588, facility owners must produce a comprehensive inventory of routine releases of hundreds of toxic compounds to the air. Based on the results of the inventories, some facility owners have been required to perform health risk assessments to evaluate the impact of routine emissions of toxics from their facilities. If the health risk assessment shows a significant risk, the facility operator will be required to notify the public of the results of the risk assessment. The Air Toxics "Hot Spots" Program was originally adopted as a public right to know law. It did not originally require emission or risk reduction. However, locally and statewide, we have seen voluntary emission reductions as a result of the program. Moreover, recent legislation (SB 1731, Calderon) , effective January 1, 1993, will require emission reductions from facilities that pose a significant risk. The legislation did not define "significant risk" for risk reduction purposes. Health Risk Assessment The term health risk assessment as used in the Air Toxics "Hot Spots" Program is an estimate of the probability that an adverse health effect could occur. The facility's emissions, stack information, local weather conditions, chemical dose - response data, etc. are fed into a computer model to produce an estimate of the health risk to people nearby from the facility's emission. Risk assessments, as used here, do not involve studies where information about actual illness in the local population is gathered. May 6, 1993 VENTURA COUNTY AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT 669 County Square Drive, Ventura CA 93003 805/ 645 -1401 FAX 805/ 645 -1444 www.veapcd.org AB 2588 COMBUSTION EMISSION FACTORS Emission factors for combustion of natural gas and diesel fuel were developed for use in AB 2588 emission inventory reports in 1990 and updated in 1991, 1992 and 1995. These factors have been updated again based on new data available from the USEPA (1) (10). These emission factors are to be used where source testing or fuel analysis are not required by the AB 2588 Criteria and Guidelines Regulations, Appendix D. The factors are divided into external combustion sources (boilers, heaters, flares) and internal combustion sources (engines, turbines). Natural gas combustion factors are further divided into a number of sub - categories, based on equipment size and type. If better source specific data such as manufacturer's data, source tests, or fuel analysis is available, it should be used rather than these emission factors. Natural Gas Combustion Factors Natural gas combustion factors were developed for listed substances identified by the California Air Resources Board (CARB) as significant components of natural gas combustion emissions (2) and for some federal HAPs. In the past, the VCAPCD has included emission factors for natural gas fired internal combustion equipment in this document. In 2000, the USEPA published air toxics emission factors for natural gas fired turbines and engines. For natural gas fired internal combustion equipment, the emission factors from the USEPA publication AP -42 (1) should be used. For natural gas fired turbines, emission factors from Table 3.1 -3 of AP -42, dated April 2000 should be used. For natural gas fired internal combustion engines, emission factors from Tables 3.2 -1, 3.2 -2, and 3.2 -3 of AP -42, dated August 2000, as applicable, should be used. Natural Gas Fired External Combustion Equipment May 17, 2001 <10 MMBTUh 10 -100 MMBTUh >100 MMBTUh flare Pollutant Emissions (lb/MMcfl benzene 0.0080 0.0058 0.0017 0.159 formaldehyde PAH's (including naphthalene) 0.0170 0.0004 0.0123 0.0004 0.0036 0.0004 1.169 0.014 naphthalene 0.0003 0.0003 0.0003 0.011 acetaldehyde 0.0043 0.0031 0.0009 0.043 acrolein 0.0027 0.0027 0.0008 0.010 propylene 0.7310 0.5300 0.01553 2.440 toluene 0.0366 0.0265 0.0078 0.058 xylenes 0.0272 0.0197 0.0058 0.029 ethyl benzene 0.0095 0.0069 0.0020 1.444 hexane 0.0063 0.0046 0.0013 0.029 May 17, 2001 External combustion equipment includes boilers, heaters, and steam generators. Derivation of Factors The emission factors for boilers, heaters, and steam generators were based on the results of source tests performed mostly on units rated at between 10 and 100 million BTU per hour. The following test data was used: benzene (3) (6) (16) (19); formaldehyde (3) (6) (19); PAH, naphthalene, toluene, xylenes, ethyl benzene (16) (19); acetaldehyde, acrolein, and propylene (19); and hexane (20). The test results listed above were used directly to determine the emission factors for boilers, heaters, and steam generators with heat input ratings of 10 -100 MMBTU/hr. For units <10 MMBTU/hr and >100 MMBTU/hr, were calculated by scaling the factors for 10 -100 MMBTU/hr equipment by the ratios of their TOC emission factors (7). For flares, the factors were developed by applying the CARB species profiles (8) to the USEPA TOC emission factor for flares (1). The internal combustion species profile was used as CARB stated that they had very little confidence in the external combustion profile, and they use only the internal combustion profile (9). Information on acrolein was not contained in the species profile used. It was therefore assumed that the ratio of acrolein to formaldehyde is the same for flares as for turbines. The PAH emission factor is from EPA (10) May 17, 2001 Diesel Combustion Factors Diesel ( #1, #2 fuel oil) combustion factors were developed for listed substances identified by the CARB as significant components of diesel fuel combustion emissions (2) and for federal HAPs for which data was available. Diesel Combustion Factors ND - not detected May 17, 2001 external combustion internal combustion Pollutant Emissions (lb /1000 gal) benzene 0.0044 0.1863 formaldehyde 0.3506 1.7261 PAH's (including naphthalene) 0.0498 0.0559 naphthalene 0.0053 0.0197 acetaldehyde 0.3506 0.7833 acrolein 0.3506 0.0339 1,3- butadiene 0.0148 0.2174 chlorobenzene 0.0002 0.0002 dioxins ND ND furans ND ND propylene 0.0100 0.4670 hexane 0.0035 0.0269 toluene 0.0044 0.1054 xylenes 0.0016 0.0424 ethyl benzene 0.0002 0.0109 hydrogen chloride 0.1863 0.1863 arsenic 0.0016 0.0016 beryllium ND ND cadmium 0.0015 0.0015 total chromium 0.0006 0.0006 hexavalent chromium 0.0001 0.0001 copper 0.0041 0.0041 lead 0.0083 0.0083 manganese 0.0031 0.0031 mercury 0.0020 0.0020 nickel 0.0039 0.0039 selenium 0.0022 0.0022 zinc 0.0224 0.0224 ND - not detected May 17, 2001 Derivation of Factors For external combustion equipment, formaldehyde, PAH, and naphthalene emission factors for were developed using source test data (17). Based on information from CARB it was assumed that acetaldehyde and acrolein emissions would be the same as formaldehyde (14). Emission factors for toluene, xylenes, propylene, ethyl benzene, and hexane were based on USEPA emission factors for total organic compounds and CARB species profile (8) for substances identified by CARB as significant. For internal combustion engines, emission factors for formaldehyde, PAH's, naphthalene, and metals were based on source testing (4), (5), (6), (18). Benzene, acetaldehyde, acrolein, toluene and xylenes emission factors were based on sources (4), (5), and (18). Propylene factors were based on source tests (4) and (5). 1,3- butadiene was based on (4). Ethyl benzene and hexane emission factors were based on (18). For all oil combustion equipment, emission factors for chlorobenzene, hydrogen chloride, and metals were based on stack testing and fuel analyses (4), (5), (6), (12), (13), (18). It was assumed that 99.9% of the chlorine contained in the fuel was converted to hydrogen chloride (15), with the remainder converted to chlorobenzene. 5% of the chromium in the fuel samples was assumed to be emitted as hexavalent chromium (15). Dioxins (PCDD's), furans (PCDF's), and beryllium were identified as potentially significant components of diesel combustion exhaust (2). However, the only test results for diesel combustion found (11) reported "not detected" for dioxins and furans. Beryllium has not been detected in any of the diesel fuel analyses reviewed (4), (5), (6), (12), (13), (18). For emission inventory reporting purposes, facilities should report these compounds on for PRO using an emission estimation code of "99" and writing "ND" for the emissions. References (1) USEPA, Compilation of Air Pollutant Emission Factors, Volume I, Fifth Edition, AP -42, January 1995, and Supplement F, 2000 (2) Gary Agid, California Air Resources Board, Letter to Air Pollution Control District, September 12, 1989 (3) CARNOT, Emission Inventory Testing at Southern California Edison Company Long Beach Auxilia Boiler, May 1990 (4) CARNOT, Emissions of Air Toxic Species: Test Conducted Under AB 2588 for the Western States Petroleum Association, May 1990 (5) South Coast Environmental, Compliance Report: Hydraulic Dredge "011ie Riedel ", Report Number T1238C, March 8, 1991 (6) ENSR Consulting and Engineering, Western States Petroleum Association, Pooled Source Report: Oil and Gas Production Combustion Sources. Fresno and Ventura Counties, California, Document Number 7230- 007 -700, January 1991 (7) Ventura County Air Pollution Control District, Emission Factors and Calculation Procedures, July 1985 (8) State of California Air Resources Board, Identification of Volatile Organic Compound Species Profiles, August 1991, as updated November 29, 2000, profiles 504 and 719 May 17, 2001 (9) Paul Allen, California Air Resources Board, Telephone conversation, February 1, 1990 (10) United States Environmental Protection Agency, Locating and Estimating Air Emissions From Sources of Polycyclic Organic Matter, EPA- 454/R -98 -014, July 1998 (11) United States Environmental Protection Agency, Toxic Air Pollutant Emission Factors -A Compilation for Selected Air Toxic Compounds and Sources, EPA - 450/2- 88 -006a, October 1988 (12) BTC Environmental, Inc., Ventura Port District Dredge: Air Toxics Emissions Retesting, January 29, 1991 (13) Shell Western E & P, Emission Inventory Report for Ventura Avenue Field, June 11, 1990 (14) Muriel Strand, California Air Resources Board, Telephone conversation, February 6, 1990 (15) State of California Air Resources Board, Technical Guidance Document to the Criteria and Guidelines Regulation for AB 2588, August 1989 (16) Shell Western E &P, Emission Measurements for Speciated PAH's and BTXE Compounds on a Gas fired Turbine and Steam Generator, June 24 -27, 1991 (17) Marine Corps Base Cam Pendleton California: Draft Final Air Toxics Emissions Inventory Report, May 1, 1991 (18) Entropy Environmentalists, Inc., Pooled Source Testing of a Rig Diesel -Fired Internal Combustion Engine, conducted for Western States Petroleum Association, July 29 -31, 1992 (19) Radian Corporation, Source Test Report for the Texaco Heater Treater, the Mobil Steam Generator, and the SWEPI Gas Turbine in the San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District, September 1992 (20) AIRx Testing, Emissions Testing OLS Energu Natural Gas Fired Turbine, and Two Auxiliary Boilers, Job Number 22030, April 21, 1994 May 17, 2001 Notification requirements The goal of notification under the Air Toxics "Hot Spots" Program is to inform the public of their exposure to toxic substances routinely released into the air from facilities and the potential health risks associated with those exposures. It can also provide a chance for the facility to communicate past, present, and future activities to reduce the public's exposure and risk due to their emissions. On the subject of notification, AB 2588 states: Upon approval of the health risk assessment, the operator of the facility shall provide notice to all exposed persons regarding the results of the health risk assessment prepared pursuant to Section 44361 if, in the judgment of the district, the health risk assessment indicates there is a significant health risk associated with emissions from the facility. If notice is required under this subdivision, the notice shall include only information concerning significant health risks attributed to the specific facility for which the notice is required. Any notice shall be made in accordance with procedures specified by the district. The level of risk that is considered "significant" for notification purposes is not defined in AB 2588, but is left to the discretion of each district. In Ventura County, a lifetime excess cancer risk of 10 in a million has been set as the significant risk level for the purpose of public notification under AB 2588. For acute or chronic noncancer risks, a total hazard index of 1 is considered significant. Notification Procedure The purpose of this document is to specify the procedures to be used for significant risk notification under AB 2588. Individual letters and community meetings will be used for notification. Letters and notices of community meetings will be sent to all people in the area where the calculated health risk exceeds the District's significance threshold. A facility operator may choose to expand the area that notices are sent to in order to avoid artificially splitting neighborhoods or other geographic regions. This can avoid confusion in situations where, for example, people on one side of a street receive notices and people on the other side do not. The letter to be used has a standard format and would be written by the District on District letterhead. The letter would be mailed in District envelopes by the facility along with additional material prepared by the facility. These procedures present the District letter and guidance for facilities on preparing additional notification materials. These procedures also present guidance on community meetings. May 6, 1993 The primary steps in the notification procedure are: 1. The District determines that the estimated risks in the approved health risk assessment exceed the District's notification threshold for carcinogenic and /or noncarcinogenic health effects. 2. The facility operator identifies letter recipients and determines whether languages other than English should be used in the notification. 3. The facility operator prepares a response postcard and a notification letter in their own words and submits it to the District for review. 4. The District reviews materials submitted by the facility and prepares the notification letter. 5. The facility operator mails out the notification package. 6. Based on public interest, the District determines if the facility should hold a community meeting. The District Notification Letter The goal of the District notification letter is to inform the public of the possible health risks associated with a particular facility's emissions. The District letter provides basic information concerning the Air Toxics "Hot Spots" Program and the risk assessment process, the emissions and potential health risks from the facility, and includes information to put the risks from the facility into perspective. A postcard enclosed with the letter allows people to request further information if they are interested. The facility operator should determine if many of the letter recipients will be non - English speaking. If this is the case, the facility operator should notify the District so that a District letter in the appropriate language can be drafted. Notices in an alternative language will be required if five percent of the letter recipients speak an individual language other than English. Information necessary to determine if many of the notice recipients are likely to be non - English speaking can be obtained from the Department of Finance, Demographics Research Unit, State Census, at 916/322 -4651. Attachment A is a sample District notification letter. Most of the bracketed items in the example letter are self- explanatory. However, a few require explanation as follows: May 6, 1993 [emitted substance(s)] - A list of the substances emitted by the facility. It might not include all of the toxic substances emitted from the facility, but only those that make up 90% of the risk to the maximum exposed individual. Compounds that make only a minor (aggregate < 10 %) contribution to the total risk, and those for which quantitative risk assessment was not required, would not be listed. Noncarcinogenic compounds would not be listed if notice is required only for cancer risks and vice versa. [to produce product] - A brief description of the primary product or function of the facility, mutually agreed upon by the District and the facility. [number] chances in a million - The lifetime excess cancer risk to the maximum exposed individual. [number] feet of - The distance from the facility to the location of the maximum exposed individual. [year] - The calendar year for which emission estimates used in the risk assessment were made. The Facility Letter The "facility letter" referred to here is a letter that would accompany the District letter in the notification package. Outside the required notification package, facility operators are free to convey any material they choose to the public. The minimum requirement for the facility letter is a cover letter to accompany the District letter that provides a contact name and phone number for the facility and refers to the District letter. If the facility operator chooses to include additional information in the letter, the following items are recommended: 1. The purpose for emitting the toxic substances should be stated in the facility letter. More detail can be used here as to why the substances are emitted than in the District letter. The emissions can be put into perspective relative to other sources such as automobiles or consumer products. It is very important, when using comparisons to put risks into perspective, to avoid the use of inappropriate comparisons. Comparisons should be limited to involuntary risks from man -made sources. Comparisons between involuntary exposure to toxic emissions and everyday voluntary risks are likely to invoke outrage because they do not acknowledge the outrage that people are feeling and they show a lack of concern. Comparisons that trivialize the risk, rather than putting it into perspective, tend to make people suspicious. Use of inappropriate comparisons may alienate the public and affect the credibility of the presenter. May 6, 1993 2. Any steps taken to reduce emissions should be included in the facility letter. This might include both required and voluntary efforts. The public should be informed of any reductions that have taken place over the past several years, especially since the year for which the risk assessment was prepared. 3. The facility operator should discuss any future plans to further reduce emissions of toxic substances. The percent reduction and target date could be specified. The facility letter should include only those future emission reductions that are enforceable. 4. If the facility operator decides to hold a community meeting without first soliciting public interest, the meeting notice could be included with the facility letter. 5. The risk assessment results can be discussed in the facility letter. The facility may also discuss the uncertainties with risk assessment as well as results from an uncertainty analysis. Such a discussion should be brief and not undermine the notification process. A detailed discussion of these issues might better be presented in a community meeting. Community Meetings and Additional Information Community meetings are required if recipients of the notices express an interest in attending. A postcard is enclosed with the notification soliciting, among other things, interest in a community meeting. If it has been determined that notification in a language other than English will be required, the postcard should also include that language. If a community meeting is required, it is the facility operator's responsibility to prepare and mail out the meeting notice and make arrangements for the community meeting. A facility operator may hold a community meeting without assessing public interest if desired. The purpose of the community meeting is to provide the notification letter recipients with more information about the facility's risk assessment results and to answer their questions. The meeting should be held within 60 days after the District notifies the facility that a community meeting will be required (or 60 days after notification letters are sent if public interest is not solicited prior to scheduling the meeting) . The meeting should be held at a time and place that is likely to enable the public to attend. Legal, religious, and cultural holiday seasons should be avoided. The meeting notice should be sent out two to four weeks before the scheduled date of the meeting and should state the purpose of the meeting, why people should attend, and the date, time, and location of the meeting. Notices of community meetings should be sent to everyone who received the risk notification package. A notice should also be sent to the Air Toxicology and Epidemiology Section of the Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment, 2151 Berkeley Way, Annex 11, Berkeley, CA, 94704. The notice should be in language(s) spoken by the recipients. Translators may be required if there is a significant non - English speaking audience expected at the meeting. May 6, 1993 The facility operator should coordinate with the District on plans for the public meeting. The District would like to review meeting notices before they are sent. If the District's community meeting guidelines are adhered to, the District can have staff present to participate in the meeting if requested. It is recommended that an impartial moderator be used to conduct the meeting. The choice of moderator will depend on the community in which the meeting is held. Schedule for Notification The District will notify facility operators in writing if notification will be required. The facility operator will have 60 days from receipt of the District notice to submit the facility letter and the mailing list of notice recipients to the District for review. Notices should be mailed within 15 days after the facility operator is notified in writing that District review of the notification materials is complete. Notification will be required every two years in conjunction with the update schedule under the Air Toxics "Hot Spots" Program. Inventories are required to be updated every two years under AB 2588. The District will be requiring updated risk assessments based on the updated inventories as appropriate. Notification of the results of the updated risk assessments will be required, if the risk is still found to be significant. In cases where no changes have taken place at a facility that warrant preparation of a new risk assessment, a repeat of the previous notification will be required on a biennial basis. If a biennial update shows that a facility no longer poses a significant risk, notification will not be required by the District, but the District would be pleased to cooperate with facility operators in voluntary notification efforts. Proposition 65 Warning Requirements Notification in accordance with these procedures may not necessarily satisfy the warning requirements of Proposition 65. The warning requirements under Proposition 65 differ in several respects from the notification requirements under the Air Toxics "Hot Spots" Program. For example, the notice distribution frequency specified in these procedures does not comply with Proposition 65 requirements. A facility operator should not assume that compliance with Air Toxics "Hot Spots" Program notification requirements satisfies Proposition 65 warning requirements. If facility operators want to ensure that Proposition 65 warning requirements are being complied with, they should contact the OEHHA at 916/445 -6900. May 6, 1993 Attachment A SAMPLE NOTIFICATION LETTER (date) Dear Neighbors: [Facility] has prepared a health risk assessment that shows that you may be exposed to toxic air contaminants at levels considered significant by the Ventura County Air Pollution Control Board. Why are you telling me this? State law requires [facility] to notify you of this exposure. Approximately [number] homes and businesses are receiving this notice. Who is [facility] and what do they do? [Facility] [produces product] . It is located at [address] . [A map is enclosed showing the location of [facility].] They emit [emitted compounds] into the air to [produce product] . What are the health effects of the emissions to the air? State law required [facility] to answer this question, so they have written a report called a health risk assessment that describes the possible health effects. The emitted compounds are toxic and exposure to them may increase your risk of getting cancer. The health risk assessment uses a computer model to predict what the increase in the risk of getting cancer is due to emissions from [facility] . The health risk assessment has been reviewed by state health experts and the APCD. What are my chances of getting cancer from [facility's] toxic emissions? The health risk assessment predicts that emissions from [facility] may increase your risk of getting cancer by as much as 10 to [number] chances in a million. The state and the APCD require that some cautious assumptions be used in the computer model to make sure that risks aren't underestimated. For example, the model assumes that you will be exposed to the emissions for 70 years. To calculate the high end of the risk range, the model also assumes that you live within [number] feet of the facility. If these assumptions don't apply to you, your risk is probably lower. May 6, 1993 The estimate produced by the health risk assessment only considers exposures to emissions from [facility] based on emission levels during [year] . It does not include past exposures or exposure to other toxic air pollutants besides those released from [facility] . Is this a high risk? That's a matter of opinion. It's for you to decide. We can give some information about how the risk from [facility] compares to overall current air pollution in Ventura County to help you put this risk in perspective. The cars we drive, factories, and many products we use in our homes contribute toxic compounds to our air. The APCD measures the levels of toxic compounds in the air at our Simi Valley monitoring station. Using the same health risk assessment model that was used by [facility] , we calculated that the potential risk of getting cancer from breathing the air in Ventura County is 223 in a million. What are [facility] and the APCD doing about this? There is a letter enclosed with this notice from [facility] that explains what they are doing to reduce the risk from their facility. (if applicable) The state and the APCD have already adopted some rules that reduce emissions of toxic compounds into the air and we will be adopting more in the future. How do I find out more? There are several ways you can get more information. If you have questions about anything in this notice or want to find out more about the APCD's air toxics program, call Terri Thomas at 805/645 -1405. There is a contact person and phone number for someone at [facility] in their enclosed letter. If you would like to attend a community meeting to discuss the health risk assessment, you can call Terri Thomas or you can return the enclosed postcard. The postcard also lists other information you can send for. Note: If this notice is received by a business, it should be distributed to employees or posted where employees will be likely to see it. May 6, 1993 CHAPTER VIII SURFACE TRANSPORTATION ASSISTANCE ACT 800 GENERAL The Federal Surface Transportation Assistance Act of 1982 as implemented in California Vehicle Code (CVC) 35401.5 allows on a federally designated system of highways and on access routes that are signed by Caltrans or local authorities the use of semitrailers up to 48 feet in length without king pin restrictions. The use of semitrailers up to 53 feet in length may be used on the system if the kingpin to the center of the rear axle is not greater than 40 feet for multi -axle or 38 feet for single axle and with an unlimited combination length. Situations may arise where a nonreducible load is being moved over the designated system on these semitrailers. The load may move through the state entirely on the designated system (including signed access routes) or it may have an origin or destination which requires use of nondesignated state and /or local highways. In the case of travel n irel on the designated system, and signed terminal access routes, nonreducible oversize /overweight loads on these semitrailers shall be issued permits. In the situation where the permit movement begins or ends at a location not served by the designated system (including signed terminal access routes), proof of authorization by the local agency or agencies before issuing a permit to move on the designated portion of the state highway system will not be required. A statement by the permittee that he has a permit or other local authorization will suffice. The description of the equipment should specify "3 -axle tractor /48 -foot semitrailer" or 113 -axle tractor /53 -foot semitrailer ". The king pin to center of rear axle dimension shall be indicated on the permit. Caltrans will not permit movement of these semitrailers exceeding the legal king pin to rear axle dimension on nondesignated state highways unless the load justifies their use. Return trips shall be made on designated highways. VIII - 1 NATIONAL NATIONAL NETWORK '. NETWORK, and TERMINAL - TERMINAL ACCESS ACCESS HIGHWAYS and ALL OTHER ONLY HIGHWAYS tractor- Semitrailer • Combination length • Combination length Combinations of 65' unlimited if • Semitrailer length • Semitrailer length is unlimited if: not greater than 48' (Idngpin to center of • Kingpin to center of rear axle unspecified) rear axle is not greater than 40' for or multi -axle or 38' for single axle • Semitrailer length is not greater than 53' and Idngpin to center of rear axle length is not greater than 40' for multi -axle or 38' for single axle `r 'tractor- Semitrailer and [railer Combinations • Combination length of not greater than 65' when either semitrailer or trailer length exceeds 28' -6" or • Combination length of not greater than 75' and neither semitrailer nor trailer length exceeds 28' -6" VIII - 2 • Combination length unlimited if: • Neither semi - trailer nor trailer length is greater than 28' -6" Tractor - semitrailer and doubles combinations are not subject to Vehicle Code Section 35401 (length limitations) while operating on the National Network Highways, Terminal Access Highways, and signed accesses to services when- trailer length limitations for the National Network are met (V.C. Section 35401.5). Definition of STAA Track - - -- Any tractor - semitrailer combination or set of .doubles with Iength configuration such that the truck may legally operate only on National Network Highways, Terminal Access Highways, and signed accesses to service. VIII - 3 CA Cc,4 (veh:3 5700-3 5722) VEHICLE CODE SECTION 35700 -35722 35700. (a) The legislative body of any county or city may by ordinance permit the operation and moving of vehicles and loads upon highways under their respective jurisdictions of a maximum gross weight in excess of the maximum gross weight of vehicles and loads specified in this code. (b) This section does not apply to state highways. 35700.5. (a) The Department of Transportation, upon adoption of an ordinance or resolution that is in conformance with the provisions of this section by both the City of Long Beach and the City of Los Angeles, may issue a special permit to the operator of a vehicle, combination of vehicles, or mobile equipment, permitting the operation and movement of the vehicle, combination, or equipment, and its load, on the 3.66 -mile portion of State Route 47 and State Route 103 known as the Terminal Island Freeway, between Willow Street in the City of Long Beach and Terminal Island in the City of Long Beach and the City of Los Angeles, and on the 2.1 -mile portion of State Highway Route 1 that is between Blinn Avenue in the City of Los Angeles and Harbor Avenue in the City of Long Beach, if the vehicle, combination, or equipment meets all of the following criteria: (1) The vehicle, combination of vehicles, or mobile equipment is used to transport intermodal cargo containers that are moving in international commerce. (2) The vehicle, combination of vehicles, or mobile equipment, in combination with its load, has a maximum gross weight in excess of the maximum gross weight limit of vehicles and loads specified in this chapter, but does not exceed 95,000 pounds gross vehicle weight. (3) (A) The vehicle, combination of vehicles, or mobile equipment conforms to the axle weight limits specified in Section 35550. (B) The vehicle, combination of vehicles, or mobile equipment conforms to the axle weight limits in Section 35551, except as specified in subparagraph (C). (C) Vehicles, combinations of vehicles, or mobile equipment that impose more than 80,000 pounds total gross weight on the highway by http: / /www.leginfo.ca.gov. /cgi- bin /displaycode ?section =veh &group =35001 -6000 &file = 35700 -35722 2002/07/22 CA Co�(veh:35700- 35722) any group of two or more consecutive axles, exceed 60 feet in length between the extremes of any group of two or more consecutive axles, or have more than six axles shall conform to weight limits that shall be determined by the Department of Transportation. (b) The permit issued by the Department of Transportation shall be required to authorize the operation or movement of a vehicle, combination of vehicles, or mobile equipment described in subdivision (a). The permit shall not authorize the movement of hazardous materials or hazardous wastes, as those terms are defined by local, state, and federal law. The following criteria shall be included in the application for the permit: (1) A description of the loads and vehicles to be operated under the permit. (2) An agreement wherein each applicant agrees to be responsible for all injuries to persons and for all damage to real or personal property of the state and others directly caused by or resulting from the operation of the applicant's vehicles or combination of vehicles under the conditions of the permit. The applicant shall agree to hold harmless and indemnify the state and all its agents for all costs or claims arising out of or caused by the movement of vehicles or combination of vehicles under the conditions of the permit. (3) The applicant shall provide proof of financial responsibility that covers the movement of the shipment as described in subdivision (a). The insurance shall meet the minimum requirements established by law. (4) An agreement to carry a copy of the permit in the vehicle at all times and furnish the copy upon request of an employee of the Department of the California Highway Patrol or the Department of Transportation. (5) An agreement to place an indicia, developed by the Department of Transportation, in consultation with the Department of the California Highway Patrol, upon the vehicle identifying it as a vehicle possibly operating under this section. The indicia shall be displayed in the lower right area of the front windshield of the power unit. The Department of Transportation may charge a fee to cover the cost of producing and issuing this indicia. (c) The permit issued pursuant to subdivision (a) shall be valid for one year. The permit may be canceled by the Department of Transportation for any of the following reasons: (1) The failure of the applicant to maintain any of the conditions required pursuant to subdivision (b). (2) The failure of the applicant to maintain a satisfactory rating, as required by Section 34501.12. (3) A determination by the Department of Transportation that there AIR Page VF 11 http: / /www.leginfo .ca.gov. /cgi- binldisplaycode? section =veh &group = 35001- 36000 &file= 35700 -35722 2002/07/22 CA Co( YYveh:35700- 35722) Page 11 J • is sufficient cause to cancel the permit because the continued movement of the applicant's vehicles under the permit would jeopardize the safety of the motorists on the roadway or result in undue damage to the highways listed in this section. (d) The Department of Transportation may charge a fee to cover the cost of issuing a permit pursuant to subdivision (a). (e) This section shall remain in effect only until January 1, 2003, and as of that date is repealed, unless a later enacted statute, that is enacted on or before January 1, 2003, deletes or extends that date. 35701. (a) Any city, or county for a residence district, may, by ordinance, prohibit the use of a street by any commercial vehicle or by any vehicle exceeding a maximum gross weight limit, except with respect to any vehicle which is subject to Sections 1031 to 1036, inclusive, of the Public Utilities Code, and except with respect to vehicles used for the collection and transportation of garbage, rubbish, or refuse using traditionally used routes in San Diego County when the solid waste management plan prepared under Section 66780.1 of the Government Code is amended to designate each traditionally used route used for the purpose of transporting garbage, rubbish, or refuse which intersects with a local or regional arterial circulation route contained within a city or county's traffic circulation element and which provides access to a solid waste disposal site. (b) The ordinance shall not be effective until appropriate signs are erected indicating either the streets affected by the ordinance or the streets not affected, as the local authority determines will best serve to give notice of the ordinance. (c) No ordinance adopted pursuant to this section after November 10, 1969, shall apply to any state highway which is included in the National System of Interstate and Defense Highways, except an ordinance which has been approved by a two - thirds vote of the California Transportation Commission. (d) The solid waste management plan prepared under Section 66780.1 of the Government Code by San Diego County may designate the traditionally used routes. (e) Traditionally used route," for purposes of this section, means any street used for a period of one year or more as access to or from a solid waste disposal site. http: / /www.Ieginfo.ca,gov. /cgi- bin /displaycode? section =veh &group= 35001- 36000 &file= 35700 -35722 2002/07/22 CA Coo _.)veh:35700- 35722) 35702. No ordinance proposed under Section 35701 is effective with respect to any highway which is not under the exclusive jurisdiction of the local authority enacting the ordinance, or, in the case of any state highway, until the ordinance has been submitted by the governing body of the local authority to, and approved in writing by, the Department of Transportation. In submitting a proposed ordinance to the department for approval, the governing body of the local authority shall designate therein, an alternate route for the use of vehicles, which route shall remain unrestricted by any local regulation as to weight limits or types of vehicles so long as the ordinance proposed shall remain in effect. The approval of the proposed ordinance by the Department of Transportation shall constitute an approval by it of the alternate route so designated. 35703. No ordinance adopted pursuant to Section 35701 shall prohibit any commercial vehicles coming from an unrestricted street having ingress and egress by direct route to and from a restricted street when necessary for the purpose of making pickups or deliveries of goods, wares, and merchandise from or to any building or structure located on the restricted street or for the purpose of delivering materials to be used in the actual and bona fide repair, alteration, remodeling, or construction of any building or structure upon the restricted street for which a building permit has previously been obtained. 35704. No ordinance adopted pursuant to Section 35701 to decrease weight limits shall apply to any vehicle owned by a public utility or a licensed contractor while necessarily in use in the construction, installation, or repair of any public utility. 35705. Section 35701 shall not be applicable to any city street on which money from the State Highway Account in the State Transportation Fund has been or is used for construction or maintenance except in such cases as the legislative body of the city, after notice and hearing, determines to reduce weight limits on such streets. Notice of the hearing shall be published as provided in Section 6064 of the Government Code. The notice shall advise all interested parties that they may submit written and oral objections to the proposed action and shall designate a time and place for http: / /www.Ieginfo.ca.gov. /cgi- bin /displaycode ?section =veh &group = 35001- 36000 &file =35700 -35722 Page 11 2002/07/22 CA Codes � :35700- 35722) , Page 5 o presentation of such objections. The time for submission of objections shall not expire, and the hearing may not be held, less than 60 days after the first publication of notice. The hearing shall be held before the legislative body of the city. All objections shall be considered and interested parties shall be afforded an adequate opportunity to be heard in respect to their objections. 35706. Boards of supervisors in their respective counties may by ordinance reduce the permissible weight of vehicles and loads upon unimproved county highways or upon county bridges. 35707. Boards of supervisors in their respective counties may by ordinance reduce the permissible weights upon improved highways only which by reason of deterioration will be destroyed unless the weight limits are reduced, but no such reduction shall extend for a period of more than 90 days unless actual repair of the highway is begun within that time and thereafter continuously carried on to completion. For the purposes of this section, an improved county highway means a highway paved with cement concrete or asphaltic concrete, or a highway with a roadway of hard surface not less than four inches thick made up of a mixture of rock, sand, or gravel bound together by an artificial binder other than natural soil. 35708. In the event any person protests in writing to the clerk of the board of supervisors within 15 days after the adoption of an ordinance reducing the permissible gross weight upon an improved highway, the reduction in weight shall not become final until the Department of Transportation after a hearing approves the action of the board of supervisors in making such reduction. 35709. The hearing shall be held in the county in which the highway is located within 25 days after a request therefor, and shall be conducted by one or more engineers of the Department of http: / /www.Ieginfo.ca.gov. /cgi- bin /displaycode? section =veh &group= 35001- 36000 &file =3 5700 -35722 2002/07/22 CA Cod. l I Page I 1 Transportation to be designated by the Director of Transportation. The engineers shall hear all evidence presented and report their findings in writing to the director. Such director shall, upon the basis of the findings, declare in writing the approval or disapproval of the reduction. 35710. whenever any weight limit different from those specified in this code is fixed in accordance with Section 35706 or 35707, the board of supervisors shall cause signs indicating the weight so fixed to be erected at all entrances to the highway upon which the permissible gross weight is altered. 35711. No ordinance adopted pursuant to Section 35706 or 35707 or 35712 shall prohibit any commercial vehicle from using any county highway by direct route to or from a state highway for the purpose of delivering or loading for transportation goods, wares, or merchandise. 35712. (a) Any county may, by ordinance, prohibit the use of any highway located in an unincorporated residential or subdivision area by any commercial vehicle exceeding a gross weight of 14,000 pounds. (b) Any county of the third class, as defined by Section 28024 of the Government Code, or of the ninth class, as defined by Section 28030 of the Government code, may, by ordinance, prohibit the use of any highway located in an unincorporated residential or subdivision area by any commercial vehicle exceeding a gross weight of 5,000 pounds. (c) This section does not apply to a vehicle operated by, or on behalf of, a public utility in connection with the installation, operation, maintenance, or repair of its facilities. 35713. No ordinance closing a highway under Section 35712 or 35715 is effective until appropriate signs are erected indicating either the highways affected by the ordinance or the highways not affected as the county may determine will best serve to give notice of the ordinance, nor shall any ordinance be effective with respect to any htt / /www.Ie info.ca.cov. /c i- bin /dis la code ?section= veh &c,rou 35001- 36000 &file= 35700 -35722 2002/07/22 p g g P Y P= CA Codes (:35700- 35722) Page 7 of ) county highway unless the board of supervisors designates in the ordinance an alternate route for the use of the vehicles which shall remain unrestricted by any local regulation as to commercial vehicles so long as the ordinance proposed shall remain in effect. 35714. No ordinance adopted pursuant to Section 35712 shall be effective with respect to: (a) Any vehicle which is subject to the provisions of Article 2 (commencing with Section 1031) of Chapter 5 of Part 1 of Division 1 of the Public Utilities Code. (b) Any highway, any portion of which is also under the jurisdiction of a city, unless the consent of the governing body of the city is first obtained. (c) Any commercial vehicle coming from an unrestricted highway having ingress and egress by direct route to and from the restricted highway when necessary for the purpose of making pickups or deliveries of goods, wares, and merchandise from or to any building or structure located on the restricted highway or for the purpose of delivering materials to be used in the actual and bona fide repair, alteration, remodeling, or construction of any building or structure upon the restricted highway for which a building permit has previously been obtained. (d) The operation of ambulances or hearses. (e) Any vehicle owned, operated, controlled, or used by a public utility in connection with the construction, installation, operation, maintenance, or repair of any public utility facilities. (f) Any state highway, until the proposed ordinance has been submitted by the board of supervisors of the county to and approved in writing by the Department of Transportation. In submitting a proposed ordinance to the department for approval, the board of supervisors shall designate therein, an alternate route for the use of the vehicles which shall remain unrestricted by any local regulation as to commercial vehicles so long as the ordinance proposed shall remain in effect. The approval of the proposed ordinance by the Department of Transportation shall constitute an approval by the department of the alternate route so designated. (g) Vehicles operated as an incident to any industrial, commercial or agricultural enterprise conducted within the boundaries of the unincorporated residential subdivision area. 5001 - 36000 &file =3 5700 - http- / /w g ww.Ieginfo.ca.gov. /ci- bin /disp]aycode'7section =veh &group= 335722 2002/07/22 CA Codes k :35700- 35722) J 35715. (a) The County of Nevada may by ordinance prohibit the use of Northwoods Boulevard in such county by any commercial vehicle exceeding a gross weight specified in the ordinance. (b) No ordinance adopted pursuant to this section shall be effective with respect to: (1) Any commercial vehicle coming from an unrestricted highway having ingress and egress by direct route to and from the restricted highway when necessary for the purpose of making pickups or deliveries of goods, wares, and merchandise from or to any building or structure located on the restricted highway or for the purpose of delivering materials to be used in the actual and bona fide repair, alteration, remodeling, or construction of any building or structure upon the restricted highway for which a building permit has previously been obtained. (2) The operation of ambulances or hearses. (3) Any vehicle owned, operated, controlled, or used by a public utility in connection with the construction, installation, operation, maintenance, or repair of any public utility facilities. 35716. No ordinance adopted by a city to decrease weight limits shall apply to any vehicle owned, leased, operated or controlled by any licensed contractor while necessarily in use in the construction, maintenance, or repair of a public works project, or by any highway carrier regulated by the Public Utilities commission while transporting any materials to or from a public works project, when the bids were opened prior to the adoption of the ordinance unless an alternate direct route is provided substantially within and by the city enacting the ordinance. 35717. Notwithstanding any provision to the contrary, any county may by ordinance prohibit the use of any street, road or highway by any commercial vehicle exceeding a maximum gross weight of 14,000 pounds if, by accepted engineering standards, the street, road or highway cannot support such vehicle. 35718. No ordinance adopted pursuant to section 35717 shall be effective until appropriate signs are erected indicating either the streets, roads or highways affected by the ordinance or the streets, Page 8 o 4) http: / /www.1eginfo.ca.,aov. /cgi- bin /displaycode? section =veh &group= 35001- 36000 &file= 35700 -35722 2002/07/22 CA Codes (,.35700- 35722) , Page 9 of I roads or highways not affected, as the board of supervisors may determine will best serve to give notice of the ordinance. 35719. No ordinance adopted pursuant to section 35717 shall be effective with respect to any street, road or highway which connects with, or is a continuation of, any street, road or highway of an adjoining county unless the board of supervisors of each county in which the street, road or highway is a through highway, by concurrent action and like limitation, prohibit the use of such street, road or highway pursuant to this section. 35720. No ordinance adopted pursuant to Section 35717 shall be effective with respect to: (a) Any vehicle which is subject to the provisions of Article 2 (commencing with Section 1031) of Chapter 5 of Part 1 of Division 1 of the Public Utilities Code or any farm labor vehicle. (b) Any street, road or highway which is not under the exclusive jurisdiction of the board of supervisors enacting such ordinance, except as otherwise provided in Section 35719, or, in the case of any state highway, until such proposed ordinance has been submitted by the board of supervisors to and approved in writing by the Department of Transportation. In submitting such a proposed ordinance to the department for approval, the board of supervisors shall designate therein, an alternate route or routes for the use of such vehicles which shall remain unrestricted by any local regulation as to weight limits or types of vehicles so long as the ordinance proposed shall remain in effect. The approval of such proposed ordinances by the Department of Transportation shall constitute an approval by the department of such alternate route or routes so designated. (c) Any commercial vehicle coming from an unrestricted street, road or highway having ingress and egress by direct route to and from such restricted streets, roads, and highways when necessary for the purpose of making pickups or deliveries of goods, wares and merchandise from or to any building or structure located on such restricted streets, roads or highways or for the purpose of delivering materials to be used in the actual and bona fide repair, alteration, remodeling or construction of any building or structure upon such restricted street, road or highway for which a building permit, if required, has previously been obtained therefor, or http: / /www.leginfo.ca.gov. /cgi- bin /displaycode? section =veh &group= 35001- 36000 &file =3 5700 -3 5722 2002/07/22