Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
AGENDA REPORT 2019 0717 REG CCSA ITEM 10F
CITY OF MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA City Council Meeting of July 17, 2019 ACTION A pproved Staff Recommendation, Including Adoption of Resolution No. 2109-3830. BY B.Garza F. Consider Agreements with Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. and Chambers Group, Inc. for On-Call Environmental Consulting Services; and Consider a Resolution Amending Fiscal Year (FY) 2019/20 Budget. Staff Recommendation: 1) Approve, and authorize the City Manager to execute subject to final language approval, agreements with Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. and Chambers Group, Inc. to provide on-call environmental consulting services to the City through June 30, 2021; and 2) Adopt Resolution No. 2019-___ amending the FY 2019/20 Operating Budget by appropriating $50,000 from the Community Development Fund (2200) to fully fund the environmental agreements. (ROLL CALL VOTE) (Staff: Karen Vaughn) Item: 10.F. MOORPARK CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT TO: Honorable City Council FROM: Karen Vaughn, Community Development Director DATE: 07/17/2019 Regular Meeting SUBJECT: Consider Agreements with Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. and Chambers Group, Inc. for On-Call Environmental Consulting Services; and Consider a Resolution Amending Fiscal Year 2019/20 Budget SUMMARY On May 3, 2019, the City issued a Request for Qualifications to solicit firms to provide environmental consulting services. Following staff review of the proposals received, staff recommends that the City Council approve, and authorize the City Manager to execute, subject to final language approval, agreements with Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc., and Chambers Group, Inc., to provide on-call environmental consulting services to the City through June 30, 2021. BACKGROUND As part of its community development and planning process, the City follows appropriate guidelines for the environmental review of development projects and other activities to ensure that the environment is protected and enhanced. Pursuant to these processes, the City receives technical studies and environmental documents from development applicants. As a lead agency for environmental review, the City must review these documents and may need to prepare environmental documents such as Initial Studies, Negative Declarations, Mitigated Negative Declarations, and Environmental Impact Reports. Due to its small staff size, the City has limited internal capacity to complete environmental reviews and prepare associated environmental documents in an efficient and timely manner. The City therefore occasionally relies on outside professional and technical expertise and resources. To ensure that additional professional and technical expertise will always be available when needed, and to prevent a conflict of interest Item: 10.F. 174 Honorable City Council 7/17/2019 Regular Meeting Page 2 where a selected consultant could be tasked with reviewing its own studies, the City is seeking to enter into agreements with two different consultants at this time. DISCUSSION The City may utilize the selected consultants to provide a variety of professional environmental services and both review and prepare environmental studies and documents, including Initial Studies, Negative Declarations, Mitigated Negative Declarations, and Environmental Impact Reports, in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the National Environmental Protection Act (NEPA). Examples of the types of environmental expertise to be provided by these consultants include, but are not limited to: • Aesthetics • Agricultural/Forestry • Air Quality • Biological Resources • Cultural Resources • Energy • Geology/Soils • Greenhouse Gas Emissions • Hazards and Hazardous Materials • Hydrology and Water Quality • Land Use/Planning • Mineral Resources • Noise • Population/Housing • Public Services • Recreation • Transportation • Tribal Cultural Resources • Utilities and Service Systems • Wildfire • Mandatory Findings of Significance In addition to providing services related the environmental review process of developments proposed in the City, the consultants could also be used to generate environmental studies for City-initiated projects. Having these contracts already in place will expedite the environmental review process since new individual contracts would not be required. 175 Honorable City Council 7/17/2019 Regular Meeting Page 3 The City received responses from 12 potential consultants, and Community Development Department staff reviewed the vendors based on the following criteria: • Extensive knowledge of CEQA, including preparation of Initial Studies, Mitigated Negative Declarations, and Environmental Impact Reports; • Up-to-date knowledge of recent CEQA case law and changes to requirements. • Experience with CEQA Streamlining provisions, including Sections 15183, 15331, and 15332; • Knowledge and application of vehicle miles traveled (VMT) metrics; and • Sufficient personnel, time, and other resources to deliver on-call services that may arise with short notice. Community Development staff identified the top four proposers and held in-person interviews to assess expertise, capacity, and fit with the City’s needs. Staff ranked Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. and Chambers Group, Inc. as the top qualified vendors. Staff subsequently negotiated agreements with each of the two proposers, and staff now recommends that the City Council approve the agreements with not-to- exceed payment of $100,000.00 and authorize the City Manager to execute them subject to final language approval. Fiscal Year (FY) 2019/20 Operating Budget includes an appropriation of $150,000.00 in Contractual Services. An additional appropriation of $50,000 will be requested to fully fund both contracts in the current year. This will allow flexibility for the City in assigning work under these contracts, which is needed because different projects will have different review costs and because the firms cannot review environmental studies they prepared themselves. Staff will monitor expenditures under these contracts to ensure authorized work does not exceed budget authority approved by the City Council. FISCAL IMPACT A budget amendment of additional $50,000 in Community Development Fund (2200) is requested to fully fund both agreements for FY 2019/20. The expenses incurred for work on development projects would be offset by revenues from developer deposit accounts that will fund these services. Should consultant work be requested for City projects or initiatives, staff would seek the appropriate budget amendments at that time. STAFF RECOMMENDATION (ROLL CALL VOTE) 1. Approve, and authorize the City Manager to execute subject to final language approval, agreements with Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. and Chambers Group, Inc. to provide on-call environmental consulting services to the City through June 30, 2021. 176 Honorable City Council 7/17/2019 Regular Meeting Page 4 2. Adopt Resolution No. 2019-______amending the Fiscal Year 2019/20 Operating Budget by appropriating $50,000 from the Community Development Fund (2200) to fully fund the environmental agreements. Attachments: 1. Agreement with Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 2. Agreement with Chambers Group, Inc. 3. Resolution No. 2019-_____ 177 ATTACHMENT 1 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF MOORPARK AND KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC. FOR ON-CALL ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTING SERVICES THIS AGREEMENT, made and effective as of this _____ day of ____________, 2019, between the City of Moorpark, a municipal corporation (“City”) and Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc., a North Carolina corporation (“Consultant”). In consideration of the mutual covenants and conditions set forth herein, the parties agree as follows: WHEREAS, City has the need for on-call environmental consulting services; and WHEREAS, Consultant specializes in providing such services and has the proper work experience, certifications, and background to carry out the duties involved; and WHEREAS, Consultant has submitted to City a Proposal dated May 24, 2019, which is attached hereto as Exhibit C. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants, benefits, and premises herein stated, the parties hereto agree as follows: 1. TERM The term of this Agreement shall be from the date of execution through June 30, 2021, unless this Agreement is terminated or suspended pursuant to this Agreement. 2. SCOPE OF SERVICES City does hereby retain Consultant, as an independent contractor, in a contractual capacity to provide on-call environmental consulting services, as set forth in Exhibit C. In the event there is a conflict between the provisions of Exhibit C and this Agreement, the language contained in this Agreement shall take precedence. Consultant shall perform the tasks described and set forth in Exhibit C. Consultant shall complete the tasks according to the schedule of performance which is also set forth in Exhibit C. Compensation for the services to be performed by Consultant shall be in accordance with Exhibit C. Compensation shall not exceed the rates or total contract value of one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000.00), as stated in Exhibit C, without a written Amendment to the Agreement executed by both parties. Payment by City to Consultant shall be in accordance with the provisions of this Agreement. 178 3. PERFORMANCE Consultant shall at all times faithfully, competently and to the best of their ability, experience, standard of care, and talent, perform all tasks described herein. Consultant shall employ, at a minimum, generally accepted standards and practices utilized by persons engaged in providing similar services as are required of Consultant hereunder in meeting its obligations under this Agreement. 4. MANAGEMENT The individual directly responsible for Consultant’s overall performance of the Agreement provisions herein above set forth and to serve as principal liaison between City and Consultant shall be Dana Privitt, and no other individual may be substituted without the prior written approval of the City Manager. The City’s contact person in charge of administration of this Agreement, and to serve as principal liaison between Consultant and City, shall be the City Manager or the City Manager’s designee. 5. PAYMENT Taxpayer ID number(s) must be provided by Consultant on an IRS W -9 form before payments may be made by City to Consultant. The City agrees to pay Consultant monthly, in accordance with the payment rates and terms and the schedule of payment as set forth in Exhibit C, based upon actual time spent on the above tasks. This amount shall not exceed one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000.00) for the total term of the Agreement unless additional payment is approved as provided in this Agreement. Consultant shall not be compensated for any services rendered in connection with its performance of this Agreement, which are in addition to those set forth herein, unless such additional services and compensation are authorized, in advance, in a written amendment to this Agreement executed by both parties. The City Manager, if authorized by City Council, may approve additional work not to exceed ten percent (10%) of the amount of the Agreement. Consultant shall submit invoices monthly for actual services performed. Invoices shall be submitted on or about the first business day of each month, or as soon thereafter as practical, for services provided in the previous month. Payment shall be made within thirty (30) days of receipt of each invoice as to all non-disputed fees. Any expense or reimbursable cost appearing on any invoice shall be accompanied by a receipt or other documentation subject to approval of the City Manager or the City Manager’s designee. If the City disputes any of Consultant’s fees or expenses, City shall give written notice to Consultant within thirty (30) days of receipt of any disputed fees set forth on the invoice. 179 6. TERMINATION OR SUSPENSION WITHOUT CAUSE The City may at any time, for any reason, with or without cause, suspend, or terminate this Agreement, or any portion hereof, by serving upon the Consultant at least ten (10) days prior written notice. Upon receipt of said notice, the Consultant shall immediately cease all work under this Agreement, unless the notice provides otherwise. If the City suspends or terminates a portion of this Agreement, such suspension or termination shall not make void or invalidate the remainder of this Agreement. The Consultant may terminate this Agreement only by providing City with written notice no less than thirty (30) days in advance of such termination. In the event this Agreement is terminated or suspended pursuant to this Section, the City shall pay to Consultant the actual value of the work performed up to the time of termination or suspension, provided that the work performed is of value to the City. Upon termination or suspension of the Agreement pursuant to this Section, the Consultant will submit an invoice to the City pursuant to this Agreement. 7. DEFAULT OF CONSULTANT The Consultant’s failure to comply with the provisions of this Agreement shall constitute a default. In the event that Consultant is in default for cause under the terms of this Agreement, City shall have no obligation or duty to continue compensating Consultant for any work performed after the date of default and can terminate or suspend this Agreement immediately by written notice to the Consultant. If such failure by the Consultant to make progress in the performance of work hereunder arises out of causes beyond the Consultant’s control, and without fault or negligence of the Consultant, it shall not be considered a default. If the City Manager or his/her designee determines that the Consultant is in default in the performance of any of the terms or conditions of this Agreement, he/she shall cause to be served upon the Consultant a written notice of the default. The Consultant shall have ten (10) days after service upon it of said notice in which to cure the default by rendering a satisfactory performance. In the event that the Consultant fails to cure its default within such period of time, the City shall have the right, notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, to terminate this Agreement without further notice and without prejudice to any other remedy to which it may be entitled at law, in equity or under this Agreement. 8. LIQUIDATED DAMAGES [This section intentionally left blank.] 9. OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTS Consultant shall maintain complete and accurate records with respect to sales, costs, expenses, receipts, and other such information required by City that relate to the performance of services under this Agreement. Consultant shall maintain adequate 180 records of services provided in sufficient detail to permit an evaluation of services. All such records shall be maintained in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and shall be clearly identified and readily accessible. Consultant shall provide free access to the representatives of City or the City’s designees at reasonable times to such books and records; shall give the City the right to examine and audit said books and records; shall permit City to make transcripts therefrom as necessary; and shall allow inspection of all work, data, documents, proceedings, and activities related to this Agreement. Notification of audit shall be provided at least thirty (30) days before any such audit is conducted. Such records, together with supporting documents, shall be maintained for a period of five (5) years after receipt of final payment. Upon completion of, or in the event of termination or suspension without cause of this Agreement, all original documents, designs, drawings, maps, models, computer files, surveys, notes, and other documents prepared in the course of providing the services to be performed pursuant to this Agreement shall become the sole property of the City and may be used, reused, or otherwise disposed of by the City without the permission of the Consultant. With respect to computer files, Consultant shall make available to the City, at the Consultant’s office and upon reasonable written request by the City, the necessary computer software and hardware for purposes of accessing, compiling, transferring, and printing computer files. 10. INDEMNIFICATION AND HOLD HARMLESS Indemnity for professional liability: When the law establishes a professional standard of care for Consultant’s Services, to the fullest extent permitted by law, Consultant shall indemnify, protect, defend and hold harmless City and any and all of its officials, employees, and agents (“Indemnified Parties”) from and against any and all losses, liabilities, damages, costs and expenses, including legal counsels’ fees and costs to the extent same are caused in whole or in part by any negligent or wrongful act, error or omission of Consultant, its officers, agents, employees or subconsultants (or any agency or individual that Consultant shall bear the legal liability thereof) in the performance of professional services under this Agreement. Indemnity for other than professional liability: Other than in the performance of professional services and to the full extent permitted by law, Consultant shall indemnify, protect, defend and hold harmless City, and any and all of its officials, employees, and agents from and against any liability (including liability for claims, suits, actions, arbitration proceedings, administrative proceedings, regulatory proceedings, losses, expenses or costs of any kind, whether actual, alleged or threatened, including legal counsels’ fees and costs, court costs, interest, defense costs, and expert witness fees), where the same arise out of, are a consequence of, or are in any way attributable to, in whole or in part, the performance of this Agreement by Consultant or by any individual or agency for which Consultant is legally liable, including but not limited to officers, agents, employees or subconsultants of Consultant. Consultant agrees to obtain executed indemnity agreements with provisions identical to those set forth here in this Section from each and every subconsultant, or any other person or entity involved by, for, with, or on behalf of Consultant in the 181 performance of this Agreement. In the event Consultant fails to obtain such indemnity obligations from others as required here, Consultant agrees to be fully responsible according to the terms of this Section. Failure of City to monitor compliance with these requirements imposes no additional obligations on City and will in no way act as a waiver of any rights hereunder. This obligation to indemnify and defend City as set forth here is binding on the successors, assigns, or heirs of Consultant and shall survive the termination of this Agreement or this Section. City does not and shall not waive any rights that it may have against Consultant by reason of this Section, because of the acceptance by City, or the deposit with City, of any insurance policy or certificate required pursuant to this Agreement. The hold harmless and indemnification provisions shall apply regardless of whether or not said insurance policies are determined to be applicable to any losses, liabilities, damages, costs, and expenses described in this Section. 11. INSURANCE Consultant shall maintain prior to the beginning of and for the duration of this Agreement insurance coverage as specified in Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference as though set forth in full. 12. INDEPENDENT CONSULTANT Consultant is and shall at all times remain as to the City a wholly independent Contractor. The personnel performing the services under this Agreement on behalf of Consultant shall at all times be under Consultant’s exclusive direction and control. Neither City nor any of its officers, employees, or agents shall have control over the conduct of Consultant or any of Consultant’s officers, employees, or agents, except as set forth in this Agreement. Consultant shall not at any time or in any manner represent that it or any of its officers, employees, or agents are in any manner officers or employees, or agents of the City except as set forth in this Agreement. Consultant shall not incur or have the power to incur any debt, obligation, or liability against City, or bind City in any manner. No employee benefits shall be available to Consultant in connection with the performance of this Agreement. Except for the fees paid to Consultant as provided in the Agreement, City shall not pay salaries, wages, or other compensation to Consultant for performing services hereunder for City. City shall not be liable for compensation or indemnification to Consultant for injury or sickness arising out of performing services hereunder. 13. LEGAL RESPONSIBILITIES The Consultant shall keep itself informed of local, state, and federal laws and regulations which in any manner affect those employed by it or in any way affect the performance of its service pursuant to this Agreement. The Consultant shall at all times observe and comply with all such laws and regulations, including but not limited to the Americans with Disabilities Act and Occupational Safety and Health Administration laws 182 and regulations. The Consultant shall comply with and sign Exhibit B, the Scope of Work Requirement for Professional Services Agreements Compliance with California Government Code Section 7550, when applicable. The City, and its officers and employees, shall not be liable at law or in equity occasioned by failure of the Consultant to comply with this Section. 14. ANTI DISCRIMINATION Neither the Consultant, nor any subconsultant under the Consultant, shall discriminate in employment of persons upon the work because of race, religious creed, color, national origin, ancestry, physical disability, mental disability, medical condition, genetic information, marital status, sex, gender, gender identity, gender expression, age, sexual orientation, or military and veteran status; or any other basis protected by applicable federal, state, or local law, except as provided in Section 12940 of the Government Code. Consultant shall have responsibility for compliance with this Section. 15. UNDUE INFLUENCE Consultant declares and warrants that no undue influence or pressure is used against or in concert with any officer or employee of the City in connection with the award, terms, or implementation of this Agreement, including any method of coercion, confidential financial arrangement, or financial inducement. No officer or employee of the City will receive compensation, directly or indirectly from Consultant, or any officer, employee, or agent of Consultant, in connection with the award of this Agreement or any work to be conducted as a result of this Agreement. Violation of this Section shall be a material breach of this Agreement entitling the City to any and all remedies at law or in equity. 16. NO BENEFIT TO ARISE TO LOCAL EMPLOYEES No member, officer, or employee of the City, or their designees or agents, and no public official who exercises authority over or responsibilities with respect to the Services during his/her tenure or for one year thereafter, shall have any interest, direct or indirect, in any agreement or sub-agreement, or the proceeds thereof, for work to be performed in connection with the Services performed under this Agreement. 17. CONFLICT OF INTEREST The Contractor covenants that if they or any officer or principal of their firm have any interests, or if they acquire any interest, directly or indirectly, which will conflict in any manner or degree with the performance of their services hereunder, Contractor shall immediately notify the City, in writing, informing the City of the nature of the contract, prior to commencing with any work or entering into such contract. If the City determines a potential conflict of interest, the City may assign any work related to the conflict of interest to an alternate contractor. 183 18. NOTICE Any notice to be given pursuant to this Agreement shall be in writing, and all such notices and any other document to be delivered shall be delivered by personal service or by deposit in the United States mail, certified or registered, return receipt requested, with postage prepaid, and addressed to the party for whom intended as follows: To: City Manager City of Moorpark 799 Moorpark Ave. Moorpark, CA 93021 To: Dana Privitt Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 765 The City Drive, Suite 200 Orange, CA 92868 Either party may, from time to time, by written notice to the other, designate a different address or contact person, which shall be substituted for the one above specified. Notices, payments and other documents shall be deemed delivered upon receipt by personal service or as of the third (3rd) day after deposit in the United States mail. 19. CHANGE IN NAME Should a change be contemplated in the name or nature of the Consultant's legal entity, the Consultant shall first notify the City in order that proper steps may be taken to have the change reflected in the Agreement documents. 20. ASSIGNMENT Consultant shall not assign this Agreement or any of the rights, duties, or obligations hereunder. It is understood and acknowledged by the parties that Consultant is uniquely qualified to perform the services provided for in this Agreement. 21. LICENSES At all times during the term of this Agreement, Consultant shall have in full force and effect, all licenses required of it by law for the performance of the services in this Agreement. 22. VENUE AND GOVERNING LAW This Agreement is made, entered into, and executed in Ventura County, California, and any action filed in any court or for arbitration for the interpretation, enforcement or other action of the terms, conditions, or covenants referred to herein shall be filed in the applicable court in Ventura County, California. The City and Consultant understand and agree that the laws of the state of California shall govern the 184 rights, obligations, duties, and liabilities of the parties to this Agreement and also govern the interpretation of this Agreement. 23. COST RECOVERY In the event any action, suit or proceeding is brought for the enforcement of, or the declaration of any right or obligation pursuant to this Agreement or as a result of any alleged breach of any provision of this Agreement, the prevailing party shall be entitled to recover its costs and expenses, including attorneys’ fees, from the losing party, and any judgment or decree rendered in such a proceeding shall include an award thereof. 24. ARBITRATION Cases involving a dispute between City and Consultant may be decided by an arbitrator if both sides agree in writing, with costs proportional to the judgment of the arbitrator. 25. ENTIRE AGREEMENT This Agreement and the Exhibits attached hereto contain the entire understanding between the parties relating to the obligations of the parties described in this Agreement. All prior or contemporaneous agreements, understandings, representations, and statements, oral or written, are merged into this Agreement and shall be of no further force or effect. Each party is entering into this Agreement based solely upon the representations set forth herein and upon each party’s own independent investigation of any and all facts such party deems material. 26. CAPTIONS OR HEADINGS The captions and headings of the various Articles, Paragraphs, and Exhibits of this Agreement are for convenience and identification only and shall not be deemed to limit or define the content of the respective Articles, Paragraphs, and Exhibits hereof. 27. AMENDMENTS Any amendment, modification, or variation from the terms of this Agreement shall be in writing and shall be effective only upon approval by both parties to this Agreement. 28. PRECEDENCE In the event of conflict, the requirements of the City’s Request for Proposal, if any, and this Agreement shall take precedence over those contained in the Consultant’s Proposal. 29. INTERPRETATION OF AGREEMENT Should interpretation of this Agreement, or any portion thereof, be necessary, it is deemed that this Agreement was prepared by the parties jointly and equally, and shall 185 not be interpreted against either party on the ground that the party prepared the Agreement or caused it to be prepared. 30. WAIVER No waiver of any provision of this Agreement shall be deemed, or shall constitute, a waiver of any other provision, whether or not similar, nor shall any such waiver constitute a continuing or subsequent waiver of the same provision. No waiver shall be binding unless executed in writing by the party making the waiver. 31. AUTHORITY TO EXECUTE The person or persons executing this Agreement on behalf of the Consultant warrants and represents that he/she has the authority to execute this Agreement on behalf of the Consultant and has the authority to bind Consultant to the performance of obligations hereunder. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed the day and year first above written. CITY OF MOORPARK KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC. __________________________________ __________________________________ Troy Brown, City Manager , Attest: __________________________________ Ky Spangler, City Clerk 186 Exhibit A INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS Prior to the beginning of and throughout the duration of Work, Consultant will maintain insurance in conformance with the requirements set forth below. Consultant will use existing coverage to comply with these requirements. If that existing coverage does not meet requirements set forth here, Consultant agrees to amend, supplement, or endorse the existing coverage to do so. Consultant acknowledges that the insurance coverage and policy limits set forth in this section constitute the minimum amount of coverage required. Any insurance proceeds available to the City in excess of the limits and coverage required in this Agreement and which is applicable to a given loss, will be available to the City. Consultant shall provide the following types and amounts of insurance: Commercial General Liability Insurance using Insurance Services Office (ISO) “Commercial General Liability” policy form CG 00 01 or the exact equivalent. Defense costs must be paid in addition to limits. There shall be no cross liability exclusion for claims or suits by one insured against another. Limits are subject to review but in no event less than $1,000,000 per occurrence for all covered losses and no less than $2,000,000 general aggregate. Business Auto Coverage on ISO Business Auto Coverage form CA 00 01 including symbol 1 (Any Auto) or the exact equivalent. Limits are subject to review, but in no event to be less than $1,000,000 per accident. If Consultant owns no vehicles, this requirement may be satisfied by a non-owned auto endorsement to the general liability policy described above. If Consultant or Consultant’s employees will use personal autos in any way on this project, Consultant shall provide evidence of personal auto liability for each such person. Workers’ Compensation on a state-approved policy form providing statutory benefits as required by law with employer’s liability limits no less than $1,000,000 per accident or disease. Professional Liability or Errors and Omissions Insurance as appropriate shall be written on a policy form coverage specifically designed to protect against negligent acts, errors or omissions of the Consultant and “Covered Professional Services” as designated in the policy must specifically include work performed under this Agreement. The policy limit shall be no less than $1,000,000 per claim and in the aggregate. The policy must “pay on behalf of” the insured and must include a provision establishing the insurer’s duty to defend. The policy retroactive date shall be on or before the effective date of this Agreement. Excess or Umbrella Liability Insurance (Over Primary) if used to meet limit requirements, shall provide coverage at least as broad as specified for the underlying coverages. Coverage shall be provided on a “pay on behalf” basis, with defense costs 187 payable in addition to policy limits. Policy shall contain a provision obligating insurer at the time insured’s liability is determined, not requiring actual payment by the insured first. There shall be no cross liability exclusion precluding coverage for claims or suits by one insured against another. Coverage shall be applicable to the City for injury to employees of Consultant, subconsultants, or others involved in the Work. The scope of coverage provided is subject to approval by the City following receipt of proof of insurance as required herein. Limits are subject to review but in no event less than $1,000,000 aggregate. Insurance procured pursuant to these requirements shall be written by insurers that are admitted carriers in the State of California and with an A.M. Bests rating of A- or better and a minimum financial size of VII. General conditions pertaining to provision of insurance coverage by Consultant. Consultant and the City agree to the following with respect to insurance provided by Consultant: 1. Consultant agrees to have its insurer endorse the third party general liability coverage required herein to include as additional insureds the City, its officials, employees, and agents, using standard ISO endorsement CG 2010 and CG 2037 with edition acceptable to the City. Consultant also agrees to require all contractors and subcontractors to do likewise. 2. No liability insurance coverage provided to comply with this Agreement shall prohibit Consultant, or Consultant’s employees, or agents, from waiving the right to subrogation prior to a loss. Consultant agrees to waive subrogation rights against the City regardless of the applicability of any insurance proceeds, and to require all contractors and subconsultants to do likewise. 3. All insurance coverage and limits provided by Contractor and available or applicable to this Agreement are intended to apply to the full extent of the policies. Nothing contained in this Agreement or any other agreement relating to the City or its operation limits the application of such insurance coverage. 4. None of the coverages required herein will be in compliance with these requirements if they include limiting endorsement of any kind that has not been first submitted to the City and approved in writing. 5. No liability policy shall contain any provision or definition that would serve to eliminate so-called “third party action over” claims, including any exclusion for bodily injury to an employee of the insured or of any contractor or subconsultant. 6. All coverage types and limits required are subject to approval, modification, and additional requirements by the City, as the need arises. Consultant shall not make any reductions in scope of coverage (e.g. elimination of contractual liability or reduction of discovery period) that may affect the City’s protection without the City’s prior written consent. 188 7. Proof of compliance with these insurance requirements, consisting of certificates of insurance evidencing all of the coverages required and an additional insured endorsement to Consultant’s general liability policy, shall be delivered to city at or prior to the execution of this Agreement. In the event such proof of any insurance is not delivered as required, or in the event such insurance is canceled or reduced at any time and no replacement coverage is provided, the City has the right, but not the duty, to obtain any insurance it deems necessary to protect its interests under this or any other Agreement and to pay the premium. Any premium so paid by the City shall be charged to and promptly paid by Consultant or deducted from sums due Consultant, at the City’s option. 8. Certificate(s) are to reflect that the insurer will provide thirty (30) days notice to the City of any cancellation or reduction of coverage. Consultant agrees to require its insurer to modify such certificates to delete any exculpatory wording stating that failure of the insurer to mail written notice of cancellation or reduction of coverage imposes no obligation, or that any party will “endeavor” (as opposed to being required) to comply with the requirements of the certificate. 9. It is acknowledged by the parties of this Agreement that all insurance coverage required to be provided by Consultant or any subconsultant, with the exception of professional liability, is intended to apply first and on a primary, non-contributing basis in relation to any other insurance or self-insurance available to the City. 10. Consultant agrees to ensure that subconsultants, and any other party involved with the Work who is brought onto or involved in the Work by Consultant, provide the same minimum insurance required of Consultant. Consultant agrees to monitor and review all such coverage and assumes all responsibility for ensuring that such coverage is provided in conformity with the requirements of this section. Consultant agrees that upon request, all agreements with subconsultants and others engaged in the Work will be submitted to the City for review. 11. Consultant agrees not to self-insure or to use any self-insured retentions or deductibles on any portion of the insurance required herein and further agrees that it will not allow any contractor, subconsultant, Architect, Engineer, or other entity or person in any way involved in the performance of Work contemplated by this Agreement to self-insure its obligations to the City. If Consultant’s existing coverage includes a deductible or self-insured retention, the deductible or self- insured retention must be declared to the City. At that time, the City shall review options with the Consultant, which may include reduction or elimination of the deductible or self-insured retention, substitution of other coverage, or other solutions. 12. The City reserves the right at any time during the term of the Agreement to change the amounts and types of insurance required by giving the Consultant ninety (90) days advance written notice of such change. If such change results in substantial additional cost to the Consultant, the City will negotiate additional compensation proportional to the increased benefit to the City. 189 13. For purposes of applying insurance coverage only, this Agreement will be deemed to have been executed immediately upon any party hereto taking any steps that can be deemed to be in furtherance of or towards performance of this Agreement. 14. Consultant acknowledges and agrees that any actual or alleged failure on the part of the City to inform Consultant of non-compliance with an insurance requirement in no way imposes any additional obligations to the City nor does it waive any rights hereunder in this or any other regard. 15. Consultant will renew the required coverage annually as long as the City, or its employees or agents face an exposure from operations of any type pursuant to this Agreement. This obligation applies whether or not the Agreement is canceled or terminated for any reason. Termination of this obligation is not effective until the City executes a written statement to that effect. 16. Consultant shall provide proof that policies of insurance required herein expiring during the term of this Agreement have been renewed or replaced with other policies providing at least the same coverage. Proof that such coverage has been ordered shall be submitted prior to expiration. A coverage binder or letter from Consultant’s insurance agent to this effect is acceptable. A certificate of insurance and/or additional insured endorsement as required in these specifications applicable to the renewing or new coverage must be provided to the City within five days of the expiration of coverage. 17. The provisions of any Workers’ Compensation or similar act will not limit the obligations of Consultant under this Agreement. Consultant expressly agrees not to use any statutory immunity defenses under such laws with respect to the City, its employees, officials and agents. 18. Requirements of specific coverage features or limits contained in this section are not intended as limitations on coverage, limits, or other requirements nor as a waiver of any coverage normally provided by any given policy. Specific reference to a given coverage feature is for purposes of clarification only as it pertains to a given issue, and is not intended by any party or insured to be limiting or all- inclusive. 19. These insurance requirements are intended to be separate and distinct from any other provision in this Agreement and are intended by the parties here to be interpreted as such. 20. The requirements in this section supersede all other sections and provisions of this Agreement to the extent that any other section or provision conflicts or impairs the provisions of this section. 21. Consultant agrees to be responsible for ensuring that no contract used by any party involved in any way with the Work reserves the right to charge the City or 190 Consultant for the cost of additional insurance coverage required by this Agreement. Any such provisions are to be deleted with reference to the City. It is not the intent of the City to reimburse any third party for the cost of complying with these requirements. There shall be no recourse against the City for payment of premiums or other amounts with respect thereto. 22. Consultant agrees to provide immediate notice to City of any claim or loss against Consultant arising out of the work performed under this Agreement. The City assumes no obligation or liability by such notice, but has the right (but not the duty) to monitor the handling of any such claim or claims if they are likely to involve the City. 191 Exhibit B CITY OF MOORPARK Scope of Work Requirement for Professional Services Agreements Compliance with California Government Code Section 7550 Consultant shall sign and include this page in any document or written reports prepared by Consultant for the City of Moorpark (City) to which California Government Code Section 7550 (Government Code § 7550) applies. Government Code §7550 reads: “(a) Any document or written report prepared for or under the direction of a state or local agency, that is prepared in whole or in part by nonemployees of the agency, shall contain the numbers and dollar amounts of all contracts and subcontracts relating to the preparation of the document or written report; if the total cost for the work performed by nonemployees of the agency exceeds five thousand dollars ($5,000). The contract and subcontract numbers and dollar amounts shall be contained in a separate section of the document or written report. (b) When multiple documents or written reports are the subject or product of the contract, the disclosure section may also contain a statement indicating that the total contract amount represents compensation for multiple documents or written reports.” For all Professional Services Agreement with a total dollar value in excess of $5,000, a signed and completed copy of this form must be attached to all documents or completed reports submitted to the City pursuant to the Scope of Work. Does the dollar value of this Professional Services Agreement exceed $5,000? Yes No If yes, then the following information must be provided in compliance with Government Code § 7550: 1. Dollar amount of Agreement/Contract: $ 100,000.00 2. Dollar amount of Subcontract: $ ____________ 3. Does the total contract amount represent compensation for multiple documents or written reports? Yes No I have read the foregoing Code section and will comply with Government Code §7550. Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Signature, Title Date 192 pp.P '.11111, EXHIBIT C .... ) ._ . , ,,,,,i, ,• ...........,, -, . • .-o -, - "r1111.4111111"10114111 4 . . -- dr ,ap '' : s•- ' - ' ‘, ' - g rIV k•'' ---..*" --.". • - ;1/4 -‘- '. a• ' .." -4141.it'''V"-• . :1 -1114-(11 it t ',• .4 f 4,, ,'. _ -: i '',:, : .t.,. ..._,_.. .. ,. .., 1‘ • .- .•11Wdr. -. ' , ..-.„ -,....:404‘,--- ''.1"...1 - ' -/•,, ' ' ' ' it,' a+, • ,L I - , -AV .: • \ .4(- 7,---* :"-- :. triiik21,1,‘ .0T,:•:,' _ ..Ar•-._ , , 'L'\'. ' Ac..-4--_—.5 ..ii.:1:,,,ta•,,,,„;;;''''' Wt. '110. 'ii:Vrdi, %..... .4Y:' .i:•,, il-,..- ; .t x, 4 -1-cl, s . i,:ri-T 0 le •„, ; ... t._)j • : FIT04.1 • tor .404,1... zi, ,. •••, ,, , .Ok r .4 "" ;ii,1 , -4 . '' r ' 4 • .....,11, W.12,irr -0 ,l', . . , . ' 4 4...- , „...__ ' j..., • . ' , '-111.I ' . 0 ' ‘6 , .1.12121-01A73._, t - -4- •' .•. '• '"'7 :.,:.....01■0111. "bn IP .. ..• , ti . ,,,;„..:4$ .,_ :. ., , .. . - .„, * , • ,' . . _. '6 ti • '- . ! "ft ''' '. \ZS ... ...- 4.1 ' VC'. .' '' .•-,i, .1)! ilk„ k -4, 4 ,' ..• AI I •-.. , . "--- .,•"4 :., , -.• Alt Ir s .,4,17:. tvp iii- it? io.' .v.,-'4'_ • '..;......-1- 1 vete 1 - to.. • ___- - . 1 '34z.q:A"--.,-7...- • ' - •• -1—tc..*41 .'" - •-•. •••-, -t.,-- , -•'- „ ...._ _--: _ :...s, „Ik ammi PREPARED FOR '', i six illri R NE OM •G Atifr... , . • ' '441111011' t t . ..zrAllrap ....Tr.,co 60 iriity 0 .61/1**06.1/4. 1111 9 ..2. . '41 Ten STATEMENT OF OF QUALIFICATIONS FOR City of Moorpark On-Call Environmental Consulting Services PREPARED BY k 'imley*Horn 765 The City Drive Suite 200 Orange, CA 92868 TEL 714.939.1030 May 24, 2019 Karen Vaughn, Community Development Director City of Moorpark Community Development Department 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark, California 93021 Re: On-Call Environmental Consulting Services Dear Ms. Vaughn and Members of the Selection Committee: The City of Moorpark is dedicated to preserving the unique features and opportunities it offers its residents and workforce: natural resources and open spaces, unique community events, and established and diverse neighborhoods. Committed to ensuring new development is economically and environmentally sustainable, the City approaches community growth and development with the mindset of anticipating, adapting, and planning ahead. Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. admires the City’s thoughtfulness in evaluating future planning projects and its dedication to maintaining the environment as it contemplates new and redevelopment opportunities. This mindset is not just important for fulfilling the needs of the community, it is also essential to the environmental planning process. The City of Moorpark’s elected officials and citizens want Moorpark to remain a great place to live and work. They advocate for smart growth. City staff, specifically, Community Development Department staff, are tasked daily with the demands of evaluating and implementing development and infrastructure projects in the context of the City’s General Plan goals and policies, while listening to and addressing the sometimes-competing concerns and opinions of the community, City Council, and City Commissions. As the City continues development and redevelopment, it needs a team of highly-skilled, experienced, and responsive professionals with a proven record of successfully completing environmental documents to make sure that CEQA and regulatory mandates are met. Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. (Kimley-Horn) will provide the City with an integrated team of environmental specialists with the experience and technical expertise to ensure that City development fulfills the values and expectations of providing an outstanding quality of life to the community. Providing Environmental Consulting Services requires a consultant who understands the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) processes as they apply to the City of Moorpark, and is a recognized leader in providing and peer reviewing environmental and technical documentation. Kimley-Horn is a business-based consulting practice, operated with integrity and dedicated to providing timely, quality professional services in a profitable manner—thus meeting the needs of our clients and satisfying the professional and financial objectives of our employees and owners. Our primary goals are to meet our clients’ consulting needs; to develop an outstanding staff; to provide a positive work environment; and to maintain our professional reputation while being a well-managed and profitable firm that provides a high level of benefits to its staff. Our team provides the City with the following key strengths: Seasoned Project Leadership. The Kimley-Horn Project team would be led by Ms. Dana Privitt, AICP. Ms. Privitt has over 30 years of experience in the environmental planning field and has focused her career on CEQA environmental analyses, project management, and planning documentation for multi-issue development projects. She has managed the preparation of several CEQA documents for the City and is very familiar with preparing and processing CEQA documents in accordance with the City guidelines. Extensive Public Works Experience. Kimley-Horn’s experience includes projects for multiple local public agencies in the area. We possess necessary knowledge of the environmental, engineering, and development requirements and challenges of public works projects, as well as conditions within Ventura County. Our team also has considerable experience with varied development/redevelopment and facility/infrastructure projects involving multiple components, with many located in Ventura County, northern Los Angeles County, and the greater Southern California region. 194 Commitment to Our Clients. Kimley-Horn founder Ed Vick said, “We have no reason to exist except to serve our clients.” Quality projects don’t happen by accident at Kimley-Horn. Achieving quality is far more than a companywide program. It is fundamentally about how we conduct each specific project. Local Knowledge with National Responsiveness. The City will benefit from our team’s familiarity with the region, Dana’s prior experience working with the City, and the backing of a collaborative consulting firm with over 400 planners/environmental specialists, civil/transportation engineers, and other design professionals. On behalf of Kimley-Horn, I thank you for the opportunity to submit our statement of qualifications for this solicitation. Our goal is to establish a long-lasting, positive, and productive working relationship with the City of Moorpark by providing unparalleled environmental consulting services. Please feel free to contact me, at 714.786.6128 or Dana.Privitt@Kimley-Horn.com. Sincerely, KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC. Dana Privitt, AICP Serine Ciandella, AICP* Project Manager *Serine Ciandella, AICP is authorized by Kimley-Horn to bind the firm. 195 City of Moorpark | EVOC77010.19 Table of Contents 1. Introduction ...................................................................................1 2. Statement of Qualifications ........................................................5 3. References ..................................................................................24 4. Cost Proposal .............................................................................25 5. Additional Information ...............................................................27 196 City of Moorpark | EVOC77010.19 1 1. Introduction UNDERSTANDING OF SERVICES Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. possesses the experience and technical capability to successfully fulfill all potential task orders that may stem from the On-Call Contract with the City of Moorpark. Kimley-Horn has an impressive portfolio of completed environmental work that directly corresponds to the expertise required to process the wide assortment of projects requiring environmental and planning services for the City. Potential projects may involve public- and/or private-sector development projects that may require general plan amendments, zone changes, and/or conditional use permits; office and mixed-use project developments; infill uses, and projects associated with the revitalization of downtown areas. Kimley-Horn will bring extensive knowledge to the environmental documentation process. Kimley-Horn has been preparing CEQA and NEPA documentation in California for over 20 years. Kimley-Horn opened its first office in California in 1988. Since then, we’ve served a multitude of cities, counties, airports, transit agencies, planning organizations, councils of government, and other public clients throughout California. Kimley-Horn prides itself on being a successful consultant for local government. With the Kimley-Horn Team, the City of Moorpark’s best interest will always be the foremost focus of our efforts. As a full-service consulting firm, we can provide you a full range of our development services including comprehensive environmental and planning services, engineering, transportation planning, traffic engineering, specialized planning studies, roadway design, structural engineering, environmental assessments, utility design, survey, streetscape and landscape design, and public involvement. The Kimley-Horn Team has experience that spans all stages, from project visioning through construction and operations. Resultingly, our environmental team has the expertise to properly recommend a tailored environmental strategy for each project that a private developer or the City of Moorpark wishes to pursue. Kimley-Horn has both planners and engineers under one roof, allowing us to understand and evaluate a project from inception to environmental evaluation, construction, and operation. We have a tremendous amount of experience writing CEQA documents that allow development projects of all sizes to move forward, and we are excited to continue to make this happen in Moorpark. Because the Kimley-Horn Team can serve as a one- stop shop for environmental consulting services, the breadth of our expertise and in-house capabilities give you the comfort of knowing that a wide range of activities is all under the management and quality control of one firm. This translates to less coordination for the City, better decisions, better communication, increased productivity, and quicker, more accurate project deliverables that are consistent with the typical requirements associated with on-call contract needs. WE KNOW WHAT IT MEANS TO BE “ON-CALL” Kimley-Horn understands what it means to provide services on an as-needed basis for a local government. On-call contracts require a different approach from typical project-specific contracts. Each project assigned under an on-call contract will need an individualized approach that includes the various disciplines necessary to complete the assignment as efficiently and effectively as possible. One of many advantages Kimley-Horn offers is our ability to assign the right staff to each project. Because we have ample resources in our local offices, we can draw from a multitude of disciplines and specialists to complete each assignment— whether the project is relatively straightforward, requiring only a few people in a single discipline, or a complex project requiring numerous people and multiple disciplines. Another advantage of Kimley-Horn is our focus on project management, from the inception phase through the construction phase of each project. Our project managers receive bi-monthly effort reports on staff resources and expenses—helping them establish a clear picture of project cost, cost control effectiveness, and schedule—all tools needed to keep projects moving ahead. We also make sure that each project has sufficient, available staff. Our project managers use our “cast-ahead” system, which enables us to forecast our workload six months ahead and compare the projected workload to our resources. With this system, we can efficiently allocate our resources to each project and meet deadlines. ONE Stop Shop for your On-Call Needs 197 City of Moorpark | EVOC77010.19 2 We recognize that each project has its own expectations that must be understood, and then exceeded. Kimley-Horn’s quality control/ quality assurance (QC/QA) measures are built in to our project management processes. These QC/QA procedures are integral to Kimley-Horn’s culture in assuring that submittals/deliverables are of high quality. Our staff is available to promptly address the City of Moorpark’s requests as they arise, and we can quickly mobilize a team to meet the needs of any project. Our experience in preparing and reviewing CEQA and NEPA documents and technical reports, coordinating environmental reviews, and our commitment to maintaining an effective working relationship with City staff and other agency team members gives us a solid foundation for delivering documents that will meet the high expectations of the City. Moorpark needs a consultant with the experience and commitment to deliver highly responsive service—Kimley-Horn has been doing just that for our clients since our firm was founded over 52 years ago. Our extensive experience serving multiple cities as an on-call consultant for environmental, planning, and transportation planning and design services means you can rest assured that our approach to your projects will include innovative ideas and fresh perspectives within the framework of a thorough understanding of the City’s needs and vision. ENVIRONMENTAL AND PLANNING SERVICES Kimley-Horn provides a full range of planning and environmental services to cities, counties, and other State and local agencies and special districts, as well as private entities throughout California. Our environmental compliance services applicable to the City of Moorpark includes but not limited to: • Initial Studies • Environmental Assessments • Negative Declarations and Mitigated Negative Declarations • Addendums • Categorical Exemptions and CEQA Section 15183 Exemptions • Program and Project Environmental Impact Reports • Responses to Comments • Scoping Meetings, Outreach, and Presentations • Findings of Fact and Statements of Overriding Considerations • Noticing • Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Preparation and Compliance • Project Management and Staff Services • Public Hearing Presentations • Staff Reports • Agency Permit Processing • Regulatory Permit Processing • Categorical Exclusions • Environmental Assessments • Environmental Impact Statements Caltrans CEQA and NEPA documentation including: • Preliminary Environmental Studies (PES) • Project Study Reports • Preliminary Environmental Analysis Reports (PEARs) and PERs • Environmental Assessments/Finding of No Significant Impact (EA/FONSI) • Technical Studies including but not limited to Visual Impact Assessments, Initial Site Assessments, Air Quality, Noise, Traffic TECHNICAL ASSESSMENTS • Traffic Analyses: ICU and VMT methodologies • Parking Management • Aesthetics/Visual Impact Analysis, including shade/shadow analysis and visual simulations • Air Quality and Health Risk Assessments • Farmland Conversion: Land Evaluation and Site Assessments • Climate Action Plans • Cultural and Tribal Cultural Resources, including AB 52 and SB 18 consultation • Greenhouse Gas Emissions Assessments • Biological and Wetland Resource Assessments • Cultural and Tribal Cultural Resources, including AB 52 and SB 18 consultation 198 STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS FOR City of Moorpark On-Call Environmental Consulting Services Southern California On-Call Contracts TECHNICAL City of Agoura Hills•City of Anaheim•City of Camarillo•City of Carlsbad•City of Chino•City of Chula Vista•City of Colton•City of Costa Mesa•City of Covina•City of Culver City•City of Cypress•City of Diamond Bar•City of El Centro•City of El Segundo•City of Fontana•City of Glendale•City of Goleta•City of Hermosa Beach•City of Industry•City of Irvine•City of La Mesa•City of Lake Bsinore ASSESSMENTS •City of Lancaster•City of Long Beach•City of Los Angeles Department of Transportation(DOT)•City of Malibu•City of Menifee•City of Moreno Valley•City of National City•City of Newport Beach•City of Orange•City of Fico Povera•City of Poway•City of Redlands• (CONTINUED) City of San Clemente•City of San Diego•City of San Diego Engineering&Capital Projects Department•City of San Diego Transportation and Storm Water Department•City of San Gabriel•City of Santa Ana•City of Santa Monica•City of Simi Valley•City of South El Monte •City of Thousand Oaks•City of Ventura•City of Vista•City of West Covina•County of Riverside•County of Poverside Economic • Energy Development Agency(EDA)•County of Poverside Transportation and Land Management Agency(TLMA)•Riverside County Transportation Commission(RCTC)•County of San Bernardino•County of San Diego Department of Public Works,Airport•Los Angeles Metro•Los • Hazards including Angeles Metro,Highway Programs•Los Angeles World Airports(LAWA)•County of Los Angeles•Los Angeles Department of Water and Power•North County Transit District(NCTD)•Orange County Transit Authority(OCTA)•County of Orange•Rolling Hills Estates•San Diego Aviation Assessments County Regional Airport Authority•San Diego International Airport•San Diego Unified Port District•San Diego Association of Governments (SANDAG)•Victorville Water District•Western Poverside Council of Governments(WRCOG) • Hazardous Materials including Phase I Environmental Site Assessments• Drainage Studie41,11141• Water Quality Water QualitZ1 Management Plans SANTA BARBARA VENTURA LOS ANGELES SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY COUNTY COUNTY COUNTY • Land Use and Planning tlitifir.--a" �},�� Q Policy Analyses '4 00 cQ� • Mineral Resources a �Q� `MQ RIVERSIDE ORANGE COUNTY O • Noise and Vibration Studies tali COUNTY • Population, Housing,and % ° C1�, \�S�SANNN DIEGO COUNTY Employment Evaluations o • Public Services and Utilities/ 0 Service Systems, including infrastructure planning and design Local On-Call Environmental/Planning Orange County Los Angeles County Riverside County • Park and Recreational 1 City of Santa Ana •City of Los Angeles •City of Moreno Valley 4 City of Irvine •City of Long Beach •County of Riverside Assessments, including 4 City of San Clemente 0 City of Pico Povera •County of Riverside EDA landscape plans,trail plans,and San Diego County •City of San Gabriel •County of Riverside TLMA City of San Diego •Los Angeles Dept of Water&Power •RCTC park master plan •Los Angeles Metro San Bernardino County Santa Barbara County 4 LAWA •City of Colton • Wildland Fire Management 4 City of Goleta Ventura County •City of Fontana •City of Camarillo •City of Redlands •City of Simi Valley PLANNING AND J DESIGN • Feasibility Studies • General Plans including Housing Elements • Staffing Services/Project Management • Specific Plans and Master Plans • Urban Design • Complete Streets • Landscape Architecture • Community Engagement • Master Planning • Mobility Planning • Community Infrastructure • Entitlement Processing • Transit Planning • Zoning Codes City of Moorpark I EVOC77010,19 3 Kimley>>>Horn City of Moorpark | EVOC77010.19 5 2. Statement of Qualifications FIRM BACKGROUND Kimley-Horn is a full service, privately-owned, consulting firm recognized as a leader in providing comprehensive and innovative environmental, planning, transportation planning and engineering, and civil and structural services to public- and private-sector clients nationwide. Kimley-Horn provides our clients with a team of experienced planners working within a collaborative consulting firm that includes over 400 planners and environmental specialists, civil and transportation engineers, and other design professionals in 12 offices throughout California. Founded in 1967, we have grown from a small group of traffic engineers and transportation planners to a multidisciplinary firm of over 3,600 employees in 89 offices nationwide. Kimley-Horn’s continued growth and stability over the past 52 years is the direct result of our commitment to integrity and dedication to providing quality services to our clients. Much of our growth extends from the confidence and trust that clients have placed in us. Kimley-Horn’s long record of technical achievements is enhanced by our reputation for effective management and personal service. Our clients receive the local knowledge and responsiveness of a small firm backed by the resources a national firm can provide. Kimley-Horn has been preparing planning and environmental documentation in California for over 20 years. With the Kimley-Horn Team, the City of Moorpark’s best interest will always be the focus of our efforts. Throughout our history, Kimley-Horn has built a reputation for providing innovative, high quality consulting services and is recognized nationwide for our stature as a business enterprise, our staff’s talents, and the quality of our work environment. Kimley-Horn views every employee as playing a key role in our ability to offer exceptional client service and creative solutions, and we emphasize teamwork as the best way to achieve success. Today, we are one of the largest engineering, planning, and environmental consulting firms in the United States. We are listed on FORTUNE Magazine’s list of “100 Best Companies to Work For” and ranked No. 2 in the nation for Best Places to Work for in Consulting and Professional Services. Our key staff members bring extensive experience with local and regional development projects to deliver readable and defensible environmental documents that are sensitive to the public’s and agencies’ concerns regarding community impacts and resource protection. Our documents are also sensitive to the real-world issues associated with cost and feasibility of implementing development and infrastructure projects. Whether our role is to prepare CEQA and NEPA documents and technical studies, or to peer review this information, we understand the inherent complexities of processing multi-issue projects as well as methods for streamlining a project through the entitlement process. We have a thorough understanding of local, regional, State, and federal regulations through both our experience and regular training on changes in environmental policy and case law affecting the interpretation of current statutes. Our staff has an excellent track record of preparing thorough CEQA documents that are capable of withstanding challenge. KEY PERSONNEL When you select a consultant, you are really choosing the people who will provide the right combination of relevant experience, technical competence, local knowledge, passion for their work, and superior skill in successful project delivery with an eye for quality and detail, and that you will enjoy working with. The key team members we have assembled fit these requirements perfectly. They are seasoned environmental, planning, design, and engineering professionals with a successful track record delivering a variety of project types who are passionate about their work and do it well. Our key team members and their areas of expertise are shown in the organizational chart. The organizational chart is followed by brief bios highlighting our key team members’ qualifications. We are confident in our staff’s proven track record of success on environmental consulting services similar in nature to those outlined in the City’s RFP. Full professional resumes can be found in Additional Information, starting on page 27. 200 City of Moorpark | EVOC77010.19 6 success. Today, we are one of the largest engineering, planning, and environmental consulting firms in the United States. We are listed on FORTUNE Magazine’s list of “100 Best Companies to Work For” and ranked No. 2 in the nation for Best Places to Work for in Consulting and Professional Services. Our key staff members bring extensive experience with local and regional development projects to deliver readable and defensible environmental documents that are sensitive to the public’s and agencies’ concerns regarding community impacts and resource protection. Our documents are also sensitive to the real-world issues associated with cost and feasibility of implementing development and infrastructure projects. Whether our role is to prepare CEQA and NEPA documents and technical studies, or to peer review this information, we understand the inherent complexities of processing multi-issue projects as well as methods for streamlining a project through the entitlement process. We have a thorough understanding of local, regional, State, and federal regulations through both our experience and regular training on changes in environmental policy and case law affecting the interpretation of current statutes. Our staff has an excellent track record of preparing thorough CEQA documents that are capable of withstanding challenge. KEY PERSONNEL When you select a consultant, you are really choosing the people who will provide the right combination of relevant experience, technical competence, local knowledge, passion for their work, and superior skill in successful project delivery with an eye for quality and detail, and that you will enjoy working with. The key team members we have assembled fit these requirements perfectly. They are seasoned environmental, planning, design, and engineering professionals with a successful track record delivering a variety of project types who are passionate about their work and do it well. Our key team members and their areas of expertise are shown in the organizational chart. The organizational chart is followed by brief bios highlighting our key team members’ qualifications. We are confident in our staff’s proven track record of success on environmental consulting services similar in nature to those outlined in the City’s RFP. Full professional resumes can be found in Additional Information, starting on page 24. Dana C. Privitt, AICP – Project Manager Dana Privitt is an environmental planner with more than 30 years of private-sector and public-sector experience focused on CEQA environmental analysis, entitlement strategy, project management, staff support services, and planning documentation for multi-issue development and infrastructure projects. Her projects include small- and large-scale urban infill and greenfield developments; public infrastructure; policy programs; and public-sector support staff services. Dana has conducted CEQA training in coordination with the Association of Environmental Professionals, as well as for the City of Newport Beach and the University of California, Irvine. Dana has worked throughout her planning career on projects in the City of Moorpark. Her previous work in the City has included the Moorpark Civic Center Campus EIR, North Park Village and Nature Preserve Specific Plan Program EIR, Hidden Creek Ranch Specific Plan EIR. She has also provided staff services to Moorpark including CEQA peer review and staff report preparation. Rita Garcia – QC/QA Rita Garcia will provide quality assurance on project deliverables to the City of Moorpark. Rita is an environmental planner with more nearly 30 years of public-sector and private- sector experience managing and contributing to CEQA/NEPA documents and regulatory permitting for a broad range of projects, including various large-scale multi-component mixed-use projects. She has been involved with varied development and redevelopment, and facility and infrastructure projects in sensitive environments, with substantial public involvement and controversy. Sri Chakravarthy, P.E., T.E. - Transportation Analysis Manager Sri Chakravarthy is a senior transportation planner and project manager with more than 15 years of experience in transportation planning, traffic impact studies, parking evaluations, transportation demand management practices, and environmental impact studies. In performing these services, Sri has worked effectively and successfully with community groups and City staff. He is skilled in presenting issues and options on complex and controversial projects to various audiences. Sri has extensive experience in analyzing traffic impacts and developing solutions for impact mitigation. He has also managed numerous large-scale traffic impact studies involving extensive data collection and analysis of numerous intersections and roadway segments, as well as multiple analysis scenarios. Sri’s most recent work in the City of Moorpark has been the Los Angeles Avenue Traffic Study. Ace Malisos - Air Quality/Greenhouse Gas Emissions/ Noise/ Energy Ace Malisos has over 14 years of planning experience with a specialty in acoustics, air quality, climate change, and energy. Ace is responsible for preparing technical analyses in compliance with CEQA and NEPA for a variety of environmental planning projects involving redevelopment, infrastructure, residential, mixed use, institutional, and commercial uses, and transportation improvement projects. Jason Marechal, P.E., LEED AP - Hydrology, Drainage, and Water Quality Jason has 18 years of experience in civil engineering design and management, primarily focused on public and private land development and utility projects. His technical expertise includes all civil design aspects including grading, drainage, and utility design, along with extensive knowledge of water, sewer, hydraulics, and water quality standards. Jason is well-versed in all of the recently updated Southern California post-construction water quality requirements. He has worked extensively in all Southern California counties, and has successfully completed the design of multiple projects, ranging from 1 acre to over 100 acres in size. 201 City of Moorpark | EVOC77010.19 7 SUBCONSULTANTS Kimley-Horn strives to ensure consistent, timely delivery of services and submittals from all team members and subconsultants so that their important deliverables are received on time and are fully integrated into relevant project documents. We do this by carefully selecting the right firms to join our team. In addition to requiring topnotch skills in their respective fields and relevant local experience, we also require each subconsultant to share our firm’s commitment to quality and timeliness. Kimley-Horn’s project manager, Dana Privitt, would be the primary point of contact and will provide regular oversight of activities undertaken by our subconsultants. Dana will ensure each team member is making active and productive strides toward project success—delivering a timely and cost-efficient project. Kimley-Horn will use the following subconsultants to supplement the services of our firm. Level of involvement will be determined by the scope of work per project task. ASM Affiliates As a certified Small Business Enterprise (SBE), ASM is uniquely qualified to meet the needs of the City of Moorpark and conduct the requested services to the highest standard, on schedule and within budget. Their team has the expertise, depth of staff, and commitment to regulatory compliance to ensure the City receives quality products during and at the completion of all tasks. Since their incorporation in 1977, ASM has completed more than 5,500 technical studies including individual and large-scale historic resource surveys; National Register of Historic Places (NRHP) and California Register of Historic Resources (CRHR) eligibility evaluations and nominations; public outreach; historic context statement (HCS) development; historic and architectural overviews; inventories; assessments; Historic Preservation Plans (HPPs) and property treatment plans; interpretation and signage; direct and indirect impact assessments; Environmental Assessment (EAs) and Environmental Impact Report/Statement (EIR/S) contributions; Historic Resource Evaluation Reports (HRER); and Historic American Engineering Record (HAER), Historic American Buildings Survey (HABS), and Historic American Landscapes Surveys (HALS) documentation. Additionally, ASM specializes in all phases of compliance, including the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA), and the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). ASM’s past performance includes considerable experience performing work on an on-call basis for local agencies, including the cities of Los Angeles, Pasadena, San Diego, Riverside, San Bernardino and the counties of Los Angeles, San Diego, Orange, Kern, Riverside, San Bernardino, Inyo, Mono, and San Luis Obispo; State agencies such as California State Parks, Caltrans, and the State Water Resources Control Board; and, federal agencies including the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Department of the Navy, BLM, and the Bureau of Reclamation. Additionally, they have conducted individual property surveys and evaluations and prepared historic context statements and documentation for a variety of municipalities including Chula Vista, Fullerton, Monrovia, Ontario, San Marcos, Vista, and Whittier. It is ASM’s business plan, organizational structure, capabilities, experience and project oversight that result in client satisfaction, regardless of the workload or complexity of the required task. With their depth of staff and decades of experience performing the required services, ASM’s and technical approach will more than meet the City’s cultural resources. Dudek Dudek is a California-based environmental firm. Dudek assists private and public clients on a broad range of projects that improve their clients’ communities, infrastructure, and natural environment. As a member of the Kimley-Horn Team, Dudek will provide: Natural Resource Management We provide science-based analysis for preserve design and species survey methodologies, coupled with habitat planning, permitting, design, and installation expertise. Regulatory Compliance Our scientists and planners have established strong working relationships with the local staffs of California and federal regulatory agencies. Our knowledge of agency expectations, inter-agency agreements, and local regulations involving your project are vital for keeping projects moving forward and obtaining final approvals. Fire Management Dudek can provide fire protection plans, hazard reduction plans and fuel management plans that help prevent wildfire damage that address an area’s unique topography, vegetation, and climate issues. Working closely with our biological 202 STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS FOR City of Moorpark On-Call Environmental Consulting Services and CEQA professionals,we accomplish fire protection that avoids REPRESENTATIVE PROJECT excessive habitat impact,while protecting neighboring structures. EXPERIENCE Dudek can help quantify and evaluate risk in natural and built environments to determine appropriate measures to minimize risk Kimley-Horn staff has provided CEQA and NEPA documentation, transportation evaluations,and technical studies,and other TEAM AVAILABILITY environmental and planning consulting services to the City of Moorpark,and municipalities throughout Southern California. Kimley-Horn has sufficient personnel and resources to provide The following project are representative of the services currently timely on-call services for the City of Moorpark for a period of sought out by the City in its On-Call REP. Our team's experience up to two years Kimley-Horn has developed a proven system with the City and greater region is yet another reason why the for determining each team member's anticipated workload and City of Moorpark stands to benefit from contracting the availability Once we have developed a work plan for your project, Kimley-Horn Team. the written scope is divided into individual tasks organized by phase and discipline type The anticipated professional staff 1- MOORPARK CIVIC CENTER CAMPUS effort then is applied to a milestone schedule as a basis for PROGRAM EIR, MOORPARK. Dana Privitt identifying and forecasting the required staffing resources. Our managed the preparation of an EIR for a new civic center weekly milestone meetings are supplemented by our"cast-ahead" campus for the City of Moorpark The eastern portion of the forecasts for all Kimley-Horn projects. Cast-aheads provide an project site contains the existing Civic Center and a State- accurate projection of staffing needs and overloads with detailed listed historic building, located on Moorpark Avenue(State information for the upcoming month and summary information Route 23); the western portion of the site is undeveloped and for the next six months Kimley-Horn's production managers use vacant Existing facilities would remain operational during this tool to facilitate the shifting and balancing of work across development As proposed,the project would have included our entire firm Based upon a review of our cast-aheads,we the construction of the new City Hall and City library,removal can assure you that the staff members selected for a particular of existing modular buildings, remodeling of the existing project would be available immediately to serve you and are in an Administration Building for civic uses,construction of a new excellent position to handle the workload required to complete the civic/community building with parking,and construction of scope of work. a City park or other community uses.Key issues associated with the project included potential effects to historic / \ resources and traffic The City chose not to proceed with the \ / project and the EIR was not released for public review 1- LOS ANGELES AVENUE TRAFFIC PARTNERSHIP AVAILABLE STUDY, MOORPARK. Kimley-Horn is currently working with the City of Moorpark on this corridor study to evaluate operations,traffic signal timing,signage and \ \ / striping,and turn restrictions for Los Angeles Avenue,a primary arterial in the City of Moorpark that has experienced severe congestion In conjunction with the City,we prepared a comprehensive traffic study,and helped prepare near-term and long-term corridor improvements.These improvements would help to alleviate further congestion and to improve traffic flow. City of Moorpark I EVOC77010.19 8 Kimley>>>Horn City of Moorpark | EVOC77010.19 9 ି NORTH PARK VILLAGE AND NATURE PRESERVE SPECIFIC PLAN PROGRAM EIR, MOORPARK. Dana Privitt was the project director for the Program EIR. The 3,586.3-acre hillside project would have allowed for the development of up to 1,650 residences; 5 acres of commercial uses; 1 school site; 13 public and private parks; a 52-acre public lake; and over 2,121 acres of preserved open space. A freeway interchange into the project site from State Route 118 was proposed. Site development could not exceed 500 residential units without the Caltrans’ approval of the interchange. Entitlement of the proposed project was processed by the City of Moorpark and included actions by the City Council, Moorpark voters, and the Ventura County Local Agency Formation Commission. The Program EIR addressed land use compatibility; traffic and circulation options, including an evaluation of freeway impacts; biological resources, including the loss of oak trees, impacts to Threatened and Endangered species, and changes to wildlife movement; aesthetic and topographical changes; and air quality, noise, and hazardous materials impacts. The Final EIR was certified; this controversial project was the subject of a special election where the project was denied by the electorate. ି HIDDEN CREEK RANCH SPECIFIC PLAN NO 8 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT AND STAFF SUPPORT SERVICES, MOORPARK. Dana Privitt was the project manager for the Hidden Creek Ranch Specific Plan No. 8 Project in the City of Moorpark’s Area of Interest in Ventura County. The proposed 4,200-acre hillside project would have allowed for the development of up to 3,200 residences; a public 18-hole golf course; 21.5 acres of commercial uses; 3 school sites; and over 2,200 acres of preserved open space. Proposed zoning designations would have permitted a “links” style golf course on the eastern portion of the site. Issues addressed in the EIR included land use compatibility; traffic and circulation options; biological resources, including the loss of oak trees and potential coastal California gnatcatchers; aesthetic changes; air quality; noise; and hazardous materials. Dana was also responsible for the preparation of the update to the Hidden Creek Ranch Specific Plan, staff report preparation, and public hearing presentations for the Moorpark Planning Commission and City Council. Although the EIR was certified and the City Council approved the project, the project was overturned in a public referendum. ି GREYSTAR SENIOR HOUSING CEQA SECTION 15183 EXEMPTION ANALYSIS, SAN CLEMENTE. Kimley-Horn prepared a CEQA Section 15183 Exemption Analysis and provided peer review of the technical studies. The project would allow for a 150-unit senior housing development on approximately 6 acres of the existing Shorecliffs Golf Club in San Clemente. The existing golf course clubhouse would be demolished, and a new clubhouse constructed on the golf course property to allow for the senior housing apartment project. Similar to an Addendum, a 15183 analysis applies to projects consistent with a community plan or zoning and meets specific requirements in CEQA Guidelines Section 15183(a - j). The impacts of the project were compared to the assumptions in the City of San Clemente Centennial General Plan and Housing Element Update and the Forster Ranch Specific Plan. Kimley-Horn provided peer review of the following technical reports: air quality, health risk assessment, greenhouse gas emissions, biological resources, jurisdictional delineation, cultural resources, noise, Phase I environmental site assessment, preliminary hydrology, and water quality management plan. ି ENCINITAS 2013-2021 HOUSING ELEMENT UPDATE AND ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT, ENCINITAS. Kimley-Horn assisted the City of Encinitas in preparation of the Housing Element Update and the Environmental Assessment to address 17 candidate sites (36 parcels). The proposed amendments were intended to accommodate the City’s remaining Regional Housing Needs Assessment (RHNA) allocation based on the candidate sites’ maximum realistic yield. The project proposed various conforming amendments to the Encinitas General Plan, Encinitas Zoning Code, Local Coastal Plan, Specific Plans, and ancillary amendments to other planning documents. The Environmental Assessment addresses the candidate sites and provides a comparative analysis to the prior Housing Element Program EIR. 204 City of Moorpark | EVOC77010.19 10 ି 600 WEST COMMONWEALTH MIXED- USE DEVELOPMENT SPECIFIC PLAN IS/ MND, FULLERTON. Kimley-Horn prepared the IS/ MND and Specific Plan for the mixed-use infill development in downtown Fullerton. The project required a General Plan Amendment and zone change (specific plan) to allow for the 4.79-acre site automotive and industrial site to be redeveloped with 295 multi-family residential units with amenities, structured parking, and ground-level retail uses. Kimley-Horn prepared the CEQA documentation including responses to comments; made presentations to the Planning Commission and City Council. Dana was the Project Manager and Margit Allen prepared the Specific Plan. ି LOMA VISTA FOR-SALE AND AFFORDABLE HOUSING RESIDENTIAL PROJECT ADDENDUM TO THE YORBA LINDA HOUSING ELEMENT, YORBA LINDA. Kimley-Horn prepared an Addendum to evaluate potential impacts associated with the 192 multi-family residential development in Yorba Linda. The project site was occupied by a commercial nursery as well as multiple structures including two single-family residences and abutted a residential developments and elementary school. Of the 192 residences, 6 were proposed as affordable housing units. Other projects in the City of Yorba Linda include preparation of the most recent update to the City’s General Plan and the General Plan EIR. ି YORBA LINDA GENERAL PLAN UPDATE AND COMMUNITY OUTREACH AND PARKS AND RECREATION MASTER PLAN, YORBA LINDA. Kimley-Horn is assisting the City of Yorba Linda with a comprehensive update to the General Plan and related CEQA documentation, including the City’s Parks and Recreation Master Plan. The General Plan provides a “blueprint” for future development in the City and will include long-range goals, policies, and technical analysis addressing important community topics ranging from the natural environment and public safety, to transportation and land use. In close coordination with City staff, Kimley-Horn is led the community engagement effort for the General Plan update and Parks and Recreation Master Plan, which includes community workshops, stakeholder interview, and facilitation of a General Plan Advisory Committee comprised of at least 15 community stakeholders. ି MAINPLACE MALL TRANSFORMATION PROJECT, SANTA ANA. Kimley-Horn is preparing technical studies to support the City of Santa Ana’s preparation of CEQA documentation for the reuse of the existing MainPlace Mall. Technical studies prepared by our firm are as follows: air quality, health risk assessment, greenhouse gas emissions, noise and vibration, traffic, parking, hydrology, water quality, and water supply assessment. Kimley-Horn also is preparing the Specific Plan and civil engineering support services. MainPlace Mall has evolved over several decades from the original Fashion Square project approved in 1983, to the present mall of approximately 1,130,000 square feet of commercial uses. Existing entitlements allow for the additional development of up to 1,500,000 square feet of office use, 400 hotel rooms, and additional commercial square footage. The developer wishes to modify the entitlements to allow more flexibility in the further development of the site, reducing the allowed office and retail uses and adding residential uses. As proposed, the project would decrease the currently entitled office and commercial uses, retain the same number of hotel rooms, and introduce up to 1,900 multi-family residential units. ି NEWPORT EXECUTIVE CENTER ADDENDUM TO THE NEWPORT EXECUTIVE COURT INITIAL STUDY/ MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION, NEWPORT BEACH. Dana Privitt managed the Addendum which analyzed potential differences between the impacts identified in the Newport Executive Court Project IS/ MND and those that would be associated with the proposed Newport Executive Center Project. The project would allow for the construction of 64,000 sf of medical office uses on 4.1 acres. As a part of the evaluation, a traffic impact study was prepared by Kimley-Horn. The Addendum found that the project would not result in any new significant impacts that were not previously addressed. 205 City of Moorpark | EVOC77010.19 11 ି NEWPORT BANNING RANCH ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT, NEWPORT BEACH. Dana Privitt served as the Principal-in-Charge and Project Manager for this highly controversial coastal mixed-use development. The EIR evaluated the development of 1,375 residential dwelling units; 75,000 square feet of commercial uses; a 75-room resort inn; and 51 acres of public parks on the 401-acre active oilfield site. Approximately 252 acres were proposed for permanent open space, including restored habitat, public trails, and consolidated oil production facilities. Discretionary City approval included a General Plan Circulation Element Amendment, Master Development Plan, zone change, Planned Community Development Plan, Development Agreement, and Tract Map. Additional permits and approvals were required from agencies including the California Coastal Commission, California Department of Fish and Wildlife, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Local Agency Formation Commission, and the Regional Water Quality Control Board. Dana was responsible for staff report assistance, scoping meetings, and public hearing presentations for the Planning Commission and the City Council. ି SUNSET RIDGE PARK EIR, NEWPORT BEACH. Dana was the principal-in-charge of the Sunset Ridge Park EIR, which addressed the potential environmental impacts associated with the development of the site as a public park with active and passive recreational uses, and an access road from West Coast Highway to Sunset Ridge Park through the adjacent private Newport Banning Ranch property. Components of the proposed park project would include one baseball field, two soccer fields, a playground and picnic area, gardens, walkways, on-site parking, and restroom facilities. No nighttime lighting would be provided. The Final EIR was certified and the project approved by the City. The EIR was challenged and its adequacy upheld by the trial court. The court’s decision was appealed to the Fourth District Court of Appeal who also upheld the adequacy of the EIR. The California Supreme Court declined to review the plaintiffs appeal of the lower court’s ruling. ି KOLL CENTER RESIDENCES EIR, NEWPORT BEACH. Kimley-Horn is responsible for the preparation of an EIR to allow for an infill mixed-use residential and retail development near John Wayne Airport. The project would allow for 260 residential units, 3,000 sf of retail uses, and a 1.2-acre public park. Our planning services on this project have included preparation of the EIR including the air quality, greenhouse gas, noise, traffic, and parking studies; organization of Scoping Meeting; preparation of notices; tribal consultation consistent with AB 52; and participation in study sessions. ି ORANGE COUNTY GREAT PARK WATERPARK ADDENDUM TO THE ORANGE COUNTY GREAT PARK EIR, IRVINE. Kimley-Horn is preparing an Addendum and providing peer review of technical studies for a proposed waterpark on Marine Way at Skyhawk within the Cultural Terrace District of the Great Park. The approximately 41 acre site would be developed as an outdoor waterpark with associated surface parking. The waterpark would be operational annually from approximately May 15 to September 15. The project requires the demolition of all existing on-site buildings and infrastructure. Kimley-Horn is also providing peer review of the following technical reports: air quality, health risk assessment, greenhouse gas emissions, noise, Phase I and Phase II environmental site assessments, preliminary hydrology, and water quality management plan. ି WHITTIER BOULEVARD SPECIFIC PLAN MORATORIUM ANALYSIS AND ADDENDUM, WHITTIER. Kimley-Horn prepared a moratorium analysis for and an amendment to the Whittier Boulevard Specific Plan to develop policy solutions for issues related to future development in the area. The intent of the moratorium was to provide additional time to evaluate the potential impacts of unlimited residential development within the Workplace District of the Specific Plan area and to establish a plan of action to address these potential impacts through amendments to the Specific Plan document. To achieve this purpose and intent, the amendment to the Whittier Boulevard Specific Plan identifies areas for future housing development complementary to the Workplace District’s job-creating uses and sets a maximum number of new residential units in the Workplace District. Kimley-Horn prepared an Addendum to the Final EIR; Dana provided quality assurance review of the Addendum and staff reports and participated in public hearings. 206 City of Moorpark | EVOC77010.19 12 KEY FACTORS FOR SUCCESSFUL PROJECT DELIVERY We understand that the ideal outcome requires the experience not only to see what is directly ahead but to envision the landscape of possibilities and respond adeptly to whatever comes along— balancing rigor of process with creative thinking for remarkable results. We understand that being on point, on target, and on budget require knowing exactly what you need, when you need it. Strong Relationships: The Kimley-Horn team has developed relationships and trust with key municipal, County, State, and special district decision makers and other local and regulatory agencies which allow us to effectively communicate and build project consensus in a timely manner. In addition, we have long standing working relationships with our team members and know how to work collaboratively as a team. Involvement in Project Development: For successful project delivery, it is critical that scopes are clearly defined to help ensure both the City and Kimley-Horn project managers have the same project understanding and expectations at the start of a project. We strive to be on the same page with the agency project manager regarding expectations of work included in the project scope, including deliverables and schedule, before we submit our fee proposal. Project Management Structure: The project manager for each project is responsible for providing exceptional, proactive client service by maintaining overall control of the project delivery; managing the flow of information both internal to the project team and with the agency and key stakeholders; managing integration of our team members; maintaining adherence to budget and schedule; and being responsible for the quality control of final deliverables. Our project managers utilize a proven set of project control tools to proactively manage schedule, costs, resource needs, and minimize risks. The extensive management and design experience of our project managers will ensure that the Kimley- Horn team will be able to deliver the various types and sizes of projects likely to arise from this on-call contract. Project Delivery Team Structure: Our project-specific teams are structured to meet the complexities of the project and requirements of the scope and schedule. Each project will have a dedicated core team to provide consistency from project initiation to closeout. In addition, we staff our projects from a pool of resources with specialty skills and technical abilities required by the project. OPEN LINES OF COMMUNICATION Communication is key. Accessibility and open communication are imperative steps in completing a successful project. The Kimley- Horn Team is committed to working in a teaming relationship with City. We believe the most effective and technically sound work products evolve through clear lines of communication between all participants. We make sure project assumptions are clearly understood by all team members. These assumptions include each team member’s role on a project, the type of product to be prepared, and the approvals contemplated for the work program. Early and continuous communication allows the team to resolve issues before they become problems leading to potential project delays and additional costs. Such communication can result in changes to a proposed project such that it has fewer environmental impacts. The City will have ongoing access to Dana Privitt and Rita Garcia, as well as key team members, through telephone and email communications that are monitored to provide quick responses that are supplemented by face-to-face (and telephone) progress meetings. 207 City of Moorpark | EVOC77010.19 13 COMMITMENT TO QUALITY Quality projects don’t happen by accident at Kimley-Horn. We are firmly committed to quality performance and every member of our firm is responsible for exceeding client expectations. This aspect of our business is openly communicated and actively advocated within Kimley-Horn. Quality standards are a major subject of each person’s orientation, reviews, and ongoing training. Kimley-Horn’s quality control/quality assurance (QC/QA) means much more to us than a cursory review; these measures are built into our project management processes and are an integral part of our firm’s culture. Achieving quality is far more than a companywide program. It is fundamentally about how we conduct each individual project. Kimley-Horn insists that every project has a carefully structured scope of services, corresponding schedule, and accurately developed budget. We don’t begin an assignment until these three elements are in place and mutually agreed upon by Kimley-Horn and the client. We know that schedule and quality control are equally important. A project that is behind schedule too often sacrifices quality reviews. We insist that our project managers build into their schedules adequate time for a comprehensive quality control review in order for our project documents to be thorough, accurate, and complete. Quality is controlled by assigning a quality manager —for this On-Call Contract, Rita Garcia — to evaluate all work and procedures followed while providing the services. Quality is verified through independent reviews of the processes, procedures, documentation, coordination, technical direction, and staffing associated with project development. RESPONSIVENESS Kimley-Horn’s management approach has been proven repeatedly on past projects to be effective in meeting/exceeding our client’s goals for completing environmental documents on or ahead of schedule. Our experience in preparing CEQA and NEPA documents and technical reports, coordinating environmental reviews, and commitment to maintaining an effective working relationship with City staff and other agency team members gives us a solid foundation for delivering documents that will meet the City’s high expectations. BUDGET CONTROL, SCOPE, AND SCHEDULE ADHERENCE For each project, our project managers develop and execute a work plan which includes project scope, budget, and schedule to help ensure that the overall delivery of the project remains consistent with the expectations of the agency and stakeholders. The control of project costs and unnecessary changes is an important element of Contract Administration. We are committed to informing the City as soon as possible of any potential or proposed out-of-scope items that will affect the established budget. Adherence to the approved Scope of Services and budget can be achieved through timely and continuous communications between Kimley-Horn and City staff. Monthly invoices will document costs incurred according to task for the designated period, compared to work efforts since contract inception, inclusive of documentation noted in the RFP. ON-CALL ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES APPROACH The environmental documentation requirements for a “typical project” can vary extensively from the identification of potential environmental constraints as part of feasibility studies to document preparation pursuant to CEQA and NEPA. Our NEPA expertise is especially helpful if a project may receive federal funds or requires federal permits. Knowledge of technical issues, applicable regulations, and the City’s entitlement and regulatory processes allow Kimley-Horn to provide responsive and solution-oriented advice. Our role is to help the City determine the appropriate CEQA determination of a project whether that be a Categorical Exemption or a Section 15183 Exemption, an Addendum, a Mitigated Negative Declaration, or an EIR. We provide that guidance and expertise. Kimley-Horn understands that the environmental setting in which CEQA and NEPA documents are prepared is dynamic and subject to frequent changes in practice, policy, legislation, and case law. This is not to say that every project is complicated or will be litigated. However, we work very hard to ensure that every environmental document and technical report that we prepare, or peer review reflects all applicable rules and regulations and appropriate legal interpretations. 208 City of Moorpark | EVOC77010.19 14 Project Initiation – Start Smart. Before we put “pen to paper,” the Kimley-Horn Team will consider the entire project process to ensure that we have a complete understanding of where the project is going and how we’re going to get it there. This involves everything from making sure the existing information will fulfill the needs of the environmental document and foreseeing what permits may be required by agencies in the future that can be addressed within the current environmental document, to how the project will function upon completion. Our experience provides us the knowledge to interject direction early in the process on possible project changes and mitigation measures that can be implemented to avoid or reduce environmental impacts. Simply, we take a proactive approach to projects—we don’t wait for someone else to tell us what comes next or what else needs to be done. Kimley-Horn’s strategy begins with reviewing available project documentation, considering any changes that have occurred since previous plan preparation, and reviewing any technical studies that have been prepared for each project. We will assess whether available information is adequate and notify the City if additional information is needed. Early identification of data needs is critical in meeting the project schedule and ensuring legally defensible planning and/or environmental documents. If additional information is needed, a list of data needs will be provided in writing. Building on this, our project team will prepare additional technical reports and planning and environmental analyses to create a thorough, complete administrative and technical record upon which new conclusions will be based. Our Technical Approach for CEQA/ NEPA Includes: • Use of the 2019 adopted State CEQA Guidelines revisions including but not limited to: • Evaluation of Energy and Wildfires • Section 15064.3 which establishes vehicle miles traveled (VMT) as the CEQA methodology for vehicle traffic generation • Changes to Appendices G and N • Recent case law on air quality including Sierra Club v. County of Fresno (December 2018, Friant Ranch) which includes the assessment of a project’s impacts on human health. • Greenhouse Gas emission targets • Categorical and Statutory Exemption Review in light og case law regarding “unusual circumstances” and statutory exemptions such as those in SB 88 for certain recycled water projects. • Consistent Project Description throughout the CEQA/NEPA document and technical studies. • Consideration of “Project Design Features.” • Carefully citing support for reliance upon existing regulatory programs or prior EIRs. • Consideration and evaluation of off-site improvements. • Evaluation of potential impacts of mitigation measures. • Brief discussion of reasons for not pursuing certain mitigation measures or alternatives considered or proposed by others. • Submission of initial sample work products to streamline City staff review. • Preparation of affidavit of mailing for all required CEQA notices. • Initiation of the Final EIR during public review period (topical responses, MMRP, findings). • Provide full-service administrative support, including staff reports, meeting graphics, PowerPoints, etc. Technical Study Peer Review Kimley-Horn provides peer review of technical studies for adequacy pursuant to the CEQA review requirements and City CEQA procedures. Our will focus on: the appropriateness/ thoroughness of the methodology and analysis, whether the analysis’ conclusions are supported by factual/credible evidence, and whether the analysis meets the applicable provisions of CEQA and the State CEQA Guidelines. For each peer review we would prepare: 1) a draft technical memorandum to present peer review findings and make recommendations; 2) follow-up review will be conducted to verify that our comments and recommendations have been incorporated in the revised technical study; and 3) a final technical memorandum will be prepared to substantiate compliance with the recommendations. Our team can also provide detailed technical review of these reports including but not limited to modeling and reassessment of the analyses assumptions. CEQA peer review will be completed within 14 calendar days. 209 City of Moorpark | EVOC77010.19 15 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT PREPARATION Initial Study and Notice of Preparation If the City has determined that an EIR is required, the preparation of an Initial Study is not necessary and an expanded Notice of Preparation (NOP) can be prepared. The NOP will identify the issues to be addressed in the EIR and will provide sufficient information to document why any topical issues do not require detailed analysis in the EIR. The potential benefits of preparing an Initial Study should be discussed prior to finalization of a Scope of Work. If directed, Kimley-Horn would prepare a draft Initial Study that provides a preliminary assessment of environmental topics, referring the reader to the forthcoming EIR for in-depth analysis and mitigation measures, if necessary. A Draft Initial Study would be provided to the City within 21 calendar days of receipt of project information. If it can be adequately documented that there would be no project impact, an environmental topic could be “focused out” of the EIR through the Initial Study, and no further EIR analysis would be required. The NOP, with or without an Initial Study, will also include information about a Scoping Meeting, if applicable. Where required, the Office of Planning and Research State Clearinghouse’s Notice of Completion form will be transmitted. Notices will be provided to the City for review, and Kimley-Horn will distribute the NOP using a mailing list provided by the City. Screencheck/Draft Environmental Document The Kimley-Horn team has the expertise on the full range of technical evaluations required to support the environmental document preparation. The Initial Study preparation will be the first indicator to identify all potentially significant or significant environmental issues. Existing baseline conditions will be described in narrative, numerical, and graphic form, as appropriate to a particular issue. Potential impacts will be identified on an individual and cumulative basis. Mitigation Programs including Project Design Features (PDFs), Standard Conditions, and Mitigation Measures will be proposed to reduce impacts to less than significant levels to the extent feasible. PDFs can be called out within environmental documents to highlight the efforts that an applicant or the City has made to proactively design an environmentally sensitive project. Therefore, these efforts are recognized in the environmental document as self-mitigating design features. When mitigation is required, Kimley-Horn will propose pragmatic and effective recommendations to reduce or eliminate environmental impacts from the construction and operation of the project. Focused and strategic interaction with staff and other project team members will ensure that the environmental documentation and technical reports comprehensively address the potential impacts that might result from project implementation. The following provides general approaches to analyzing specific environmental issues. 📋Project Description. The Project Description is a critical component of a CEQA document because it is the basis for the entire environmental analysis. Therefore, we believe that the draft Project Description should be an initial deliverable. Kimley-Horn works closely with the project team to prepare a project description that articulates the characteristics of the various components of the project and the project objectives. This is the basis for all of the analyses within the EIR; therefore, the project description must be clear and comprehensive. Early preparation of the draft project description is advisable because it will allow the project team an opportunity to vet and confirm all of the assumptions that will be used throughout the EIR. Careful review of the project description and revisions to this section early in the EIR process can ensure that the project proceeds smoothly and efficiently in a cost-effective manner. 📋Environmental Setting/Existing Conditions. Kimley-Horn prepares a description of the existing environmental setting at the project site and in surrounding areas. This section is based on information obtained during site visits; aerial photographs; information provided by technical team members; and any relevant information that is available from existing documentation. The CEQA Guidelines require that the environmental setting reflect the conditions that exist at the time that the NOP is issued. This section includes a summary discussion of the regional and local surroundings and land uses; available public services and utilities; existing natural resources (e.g., biological resources, drainage/ hydrology, topography) and man-made resources (e.g., cultural resources, transportation network) that surround and inhabit the project site. This section also provides an overview of the regulatory framework applicable to the project, including land use plans, regional plans, and 210 City of Moorpark | EVOC77010.19 16 policies. Further details are provided in each of the topical areas contained in each section of the EIR. 📋Cumulative Projects. Kimley-Horn clearly states the cumulative analysis methodology, which is based on information gathered from several sources. We often recommend using both methods set forth in Section 15130(b) of the CEQA Guidelines which allows the use of a list of past, present, and reasonably anticipated future projects that could produce cumulative impacts and a summary of projections contained within an adopted general plan or related planning document that considers regional conditions. If agreed by the City, each section of the EIR will include its own cumulative impact analysis. This is our preferred format, because each topical area will have its own applicable cumulative area for consideration. For instance, for air quality, the applicable cumulative area under consideration is the entire Ventura County Air Pollution District, whereas the area of consideration for education is limited to the Moorpark Unified School District. 📋Environmental Analysis. For each topical issue addressed, the EIR will contain a discussion of the following: analysis methods; physical environment in the project area; regulatory framework applicable to the project; thresholds of significance based on the City’s environmental checklist; significant direct and indirect environmental effects; mitigation measures; and the level of significance prior to and after any mitigation. The EIR will clearly identify significant environmental effects anticipated for each environmental issue. If desired, the EIR will differentiate among features of the Project Design Features (e.g., project components intended to preclude the occurrence of impacts); Regulatory Requirements (e.g., codes, regulations, and other requirements that would apply to a project regardless of CEQA); and mitigation measures (e.g., measures required to reduce an environmental impact). For each topical issue, the EIR will identify the level of significance prior to and after mitigation, based on the established thresholds. Project effects that cannot be mitigated to a level considered less than significant are identified. 📋Aesthetics and Visual Resources. Kimley-Horn will assess potential visual changes resulting from project implementation when views are of concern, particularly in areas proposed for hillside development. The evaluation will use the appropriate analysis tools including site visits, photo- documentation, visual simulations and shade/shadow modeling. All of these analytical tools can be provided by Kimley-Horn with our in-house staff. Effects on viewsheds including viewsheds and scenic resources, degradation of visual character, and light and glare issues associated with the project are discussed. 📋Air Quality. Kimley-Horn provides a full range of air quality studies for public and private sector clients, in accordance with local, State, and federal impact assessment criteria. Our staff is trained in using state of the art computer models and assessment protocols developed by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, the California Air Resources Board (CARB), the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), Caltrans, and Air Pollution Control Districts throughout the State. Computer models used include: California Emissions Estimator Model (CalEEMod), EMFAC, OFFROAD, CALINE, and AERMOD. These modeling techniques, combined with land use and project- specific data allow our staff to quantify existing and project future criteria pollutants. Our staff has experience in preparing air quality studies for a wide range of projects including residential, commercial, industrial, recreational, institutional, mixed-use, transportation, energy facilities, water/wastewater facilities, as well as for General Plans and Specific Plans. Air quality assessments will include describing the existing air environment in terms of meteorology, local topography affecting pollutant dispersion, and ambient air monitoring data. Current air management efforts that may be related to a project will be provided with particular emphasis on the applicable requirements of the Air Quality Management Plan (AQMP). As needed, a Multiple Air Toxic Exposure Study (MATES-IV) study will be used to describe Toxic Air Contaminant levels and cancer risks. Potential Toxic Air Contaminant impacts will be assessed qualitatively using the guidance presented in California Air Resources Board’s Air Quality Land Use Handbook. As applicable, the potential for health impacts associated with valley fever will also be addressed. 📋Biological Resources and Regulatory Permitting. We have teamed with Dudek to provide expertise on the technical and regulatory aspects of natural resource assessment, impact analysis, mitigation, conservation, restoration, and land stewardship. As a part of our team, they will provide necessary analyses to meet federal, State and local environmental laws and regulations under the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), Regional Water Quality Control Board, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS), and the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW). 211 City of Moorpark | EVOC77010.19 17 For projects that would have no impact on biological resources, we will prepare a No Effect Determination (NED) Request Form for submittal to the CDFW. California Fish and Game Code Section 711.4 Subdivision (c)(1) specifies that all project proponents subject to CEQA are required to pay a filing fee for each project. However, the filing fee will be waived if a project will have no effect on fish and wildlife. It is noted, because the CDFW would determine if the proposed project meets specific conditions (no effect on fish and wildlife), completion of this task does not guarantee a NED. 📋Historic, Archaeological, and Paleontological Resources. As a member of the Kimley-Horn team, ASM Affiliates will be available to provide cultural resources evaluations for architectural history/historic preservation, prehistoric and historic archaeology, and paleontology. Should a project include federal involvement, we will evaluate a project’s compliance with NEPA requirements and implementation of Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act. With respect to historic preservation, ASM can also provide Historic Property Surveys, Treatment Plans, Historic American Building Survey/Historic American Engineering Record Reports, National Register/California Register evaluations and nominations, and State Historic Preservation Office and Tribal Historic Preservation Office consultation. Should a project include a Specific Plan or require a Specific Plan Amendment or General Plan Amendment, agency to agency consultations will be required under Senate Bill (SB) 18 between Native American groups affiliated with the project area. Additionally, Assembly Bill (AB) 52 establishes a formal consultation process for California tribes as a part of CEQA and equates significant impacts on tribal cultural resources with significant environmental impacts. On behalf of the City, Kimley-Horn and ASM can contact the California Native American Heritage Commission to identify California Native American tribal contacts; tribal representatives will be contacted regarding the proposed project. Should a request for consultation be received, the City will be required to enter into a consultation process. 📋Energy. Kimley-Horn analyzes a project’s energy implications pursuant to Public Resources Code §21100(b)(3), State CEQA Guidelines Appendix F, and the recent State CEQA Guidelines Amendments (i.e., §15162.2(b) and Appendix G.III). The analysis describes, where relevant, the wasteful, inefficient and unnecessary consumption of energy caused by a project. The analysis evaluates energy consumption associated with short- term construction activities, long-term operations, buildings, and transportation-related energy use during construction and operation. In addition to building code compliance, other relevant considerations may include the project’s size, location, orientation, equipment use, and any renewable energy features that could be incorporated into a project. The project’s effects on local and regional energy supplies and on requirements for additional capacity is also analyzed. 📋Geology and Soils. Currently, most project applicants have provided geotechnical studies to the City as a part of their submittal package. Documentation will be reviewed for adequacy with CEQA requirements and summarized; appropriate mitigation will be identified. 📋Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions. Kimley-Horn will prepare qualitative and quantitative GHG emissions analyses associated with the CEQA and/or NEPA documents. The energy implications of a project will be evaluated pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21100(b)(3) and Appendix F of the State CEQA Guidelines. We understand the evolving regulations and the activities within the Ventura County Air Pollution District and other air districts relative to GHG emissions assessments in environmental documents as well as recent case law affecting the methodology for GHG analyses. 📋Hazards and Hazardous Materials. This section evaluates potential impacts that could result from the release of hazardous materials during construction and the long-term operation of a project, as well as hazards associated with oilfield operations. Kimley-Horn staff can prepare Phase I Environmental Site Assessments (ESAs) and can review ESAs provided by an applicant for adequacy. We will summarize the findings of the data in order to identify recognized environmental conditions located within a project site or at adjacent properties that could present material risk of harm to public health or to the environment. 📋Hydrology and Water Quality. The CEQA documents will need to address a project’s potential impacts on the existing local drainage system and hydrology of the area, as well as potential flooding and surface and groundwater quality impacts. Kimley-Horn’s in-house engineers are experienced in the preparation of large- and small-scale hydrology analyses 212 City of Moorpark | EVOC77010.19 18 in support of technical site plans, programmatic land use planning/Specific Plans, and policy documents along with final engineering phase drainage plans. Drainage-related expertise includes flood plain mapping and map revisions, hydrology, hydraulic modeling, and impact analysis. In addition, Kimley-Horn prepares Water Quality Management Plans in support of entitlement and final engineering plans. With respect to drainage, Kimley-Horn can prepare an on-site conceptual drainage technical memorandum analyzing on-site runoff and drainage flow paths for pre- and post-developed conditions associated with a proposed development area. Based on the findings the hydrology, Kimley-Horn will identify drainage mitigation measures/strategies necessitated by project- generated drainage. Projects that disturb more than one acre of land surface would be required to obtain coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permitting process. Kimley-Horn can prepare WQMPs and Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plans (SWPPs) including the identification of Best Management Practices (BMPs). The CEQA document will analyze potential water quality impacts that might result from drainage, peak runoff, and erosion. Recommended mitigation measures will be designed to conform to Regional Water Quality Control Board standards for construction site erosion and sediment control and will include BMPs as well as any City and County of Ventura-specific requirements. 📋Land Use and Planning Programs. Kimley-Horn will document existing land uses surrounding a project site and will review existing planning documents relevant to the project area. A discussion of the project’s compatibility with surrounding land uses is provided, and the project’s consistency with the applicable planning documents, including the City’s General Plan and Zoning Code. Where a change is proposed within the City’s Area of Influence, a project’s consistency with the Moorpark SOAR initiative is imperative, which remains in effect until 2050. The land use compatibility discussion will address subjects such as character of use, scale, and land use intensity. If the project is of regional or Statewide significance, the project will also be reviewed in the context of regional plans, including the Southern California Association of Governments’ (SCAG) regional plans and the Air Quality Management Plan. 📋Noise and Vibration. Kimley-Horn provides a full range of noise impact analyses for public and private sector clients, in accordance with local, State, and federal impact assessment criteria. Our acoustical services include instrument-assisted noise field surveys, commercial and industrial stationary sources noise impact analyses, FHWA computer modeling of motor vehicle noise impacts for roadway and freeway projects, and rail noise impact analysis. We recognize that noise and vibration analyses is an integral part of transportation (highways, railroads, and airports), commercial, industrial, and residential development. Our team offers experience in a full range of noise and vibration services, including acoustical analysis for environmental impact reports/ statements; transportation noise studies; and community and mitigation noise monitoring. Experience includes Type I rated noise monitoring instruments, as well as sophisticated noise modeling using FHWA-RD-77-108, Traffic Noise Model 2.5, and SoundPLAN; including integrated GIS base maps depicting roadway noise contours and sensitive receptors. Kimley-Horn will prepare noise and vibration analyses as a part of the CEQA documentation. The analyses will address operational and construction noise including the potential for vibration effects primarily during any demolition and construction activities. The potential for impacts will be based on the City’s Noise Ordinance with respect to the type of land use and the location of the use within the City. 📋Population and Housing. Kimley-Horn will analyze potential impacts associated with changes in population and housing anticipated by the implementation of a proposed project. The information for this section will be largely based on data provided from the U.S. Census Bureau; the California Employment Development Department; the California Department of Finance; SCAG; and the City’s General Plan. As applicable to a specific project, the focus of the population analysis will be a comparison of the amount and type of growth anticipated with implementation of the project with the growth forecasted in the General Plan, and the policies addressing growth in the City’s planning documents. In addition, the analysis will consider consistency with the goals and policies of the Housing Element and a project addresses the City’s jobs/ housing ratio. These topics will be evaluated within the local context and with regional trends and growth management policies set forth by the City and regional agencies. 213 City of Moorpark | EVOC77010.19 19 📋Public Services and Recreation. Each project will be evaluated to determine potential impacts to public services, including fire, police, schools, libraries, and recreational facilities. Potential effects associated with project implementation can be related to the provision of adequate service levels; the need to upgrade and/or provide additional facilities to serve the project; or modifications to existing facilities as part of the project. Kimley-Horn will review available documentation to determine whether a project will impact existing recreational facilities or create additional demand for recreational facilities. 📋Transportation. Kimley-Horn offers complete in-house traffic planning and engineering services including the preparation of traffic impact studies, traffic calming studies, speed zoning studies, safety and operations studies, parking management studies, pedestrian safety programs, site access and circulation studies, and accident analyses. These various analyses are often needed as a part of the overall traffic analysis in a CEQA document. Our staff is also able to address all aspects of roadway design, including intersection geometrics, utility relocations, traffic control, signalization, and signing and marking. Before starting any traffic study, we will prepare a Traffic Scoping Agreement in order that there be concurrence with City staff on the analysis methodology including traffic scenarios and intersection evaluation. We will evaluate a project in short- term and long-term time frames as appropriate. Trip generation will be estimated and the distribution of those trips on the surrounding street system will be determined. A general project study area will include those intersections potentially impacted by the project, and freeway interchanges will be evaluated where impacts could occur to such facilities. Levels of service for the study area intersections will be calculated using peak hour intersection capacity utilization calculations, and the Highway Capacity Manual delay methodology will be used for Caltrans intersections. In addition to potential vehicular traffic, we will address the availability of public transit, including bus and train service. 📋Vehicle Miles Travelled Evaluation. New CEQA requirements, as set forth by Senate Bill 743 (SB 743), change how traffic impacts are evaluated for CEQA purposes. The new rules supersede the LOS criteria for measuring traffic impacts, replacing them with vehicles miles travelled (VMT) metrics. The updated CEQA Guidelines, which require the use of VMT, went into effect on January 1, 2019 and public agencies are required to adopt significance standards and implement VMT guidelines by July 1, 2020. Moorpark will need to develop City standards to comply with VMT requirements. We will provide examples of VMT analyses that we have applied to other projects in other municipalities and will work with the City to use these examples, as well as State Office of Planning and Research (OPR) guidance to evaluate the proposed project based on VMT requirements. 📋Utilities and Service Systems. Depending on the type and size of the project and our role, Kimley-Horn can evaluate potential impacts on utility and service providers to determine if a project will conflict with any existing utilities in the study area. Alternatively, our staff has the capabilities to provide sewer capacity analyses and preliminary water demand analyses. Areas of evaluation will include power and natural gas, communications, water treatment and distribution facilities, sewer, storm water, and water supplies. We will coordinate with the City and utility purveyors to ensure impacts are fully analyzed. Kimley-Horn is familiar with current State and federal requirements regarding energy conservation, including special requirements set forth in CEQA Guidelines Appendix F and as recently clarified through several court cases. The energy analysis includes construction, operation, and transportation- related energy, and often incorporates the findings of a GHG and related energy conservation measures as set forth through local and State building codes or CEQA mitigation measures. Public Review/Response to Comments Kimley-Horn would be responsible for coordinating document reproduction, distribution, and noticing pursuant to CEQA and, if necessary, NEPA. If any public comments are submitted, Kimley-Horn will work with the City to develop appropriate and defensible responses. Topical responses are used if multiple comments are received on the same issue. The responses are finalized as a separate document or can be provided as a revised draft EIR. 214 City of Moorpark | EVOC77010.19 20 Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations Kimley-Horn will prepare the Findings in accordance with State CEQA Guidelines Section 15091 and Section 15093 and in a format specified by the City. Kimley-Horn will submit the Draft Findings for City review and respond to one reconciled set of City comments. A Statement of Overriding Considerations will be drafted, as needed, and submitted to the City for use in the project review process. Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Establishment of a nexus between the project-specific/cumulative impacts and the suggested mitigation is critical. Design features will be identified in the project description and then described in the impacts discussion for each technical section of the environmental document as to how the design feature could prevent or lessen a significant impact. Project-specific mitigation measures will be developed in consultation with the project team and City staff. Attention will be given to streamlining the regulatory permitting process. Measures will clearly state the party responsible for and the timing of the implementation of the measure. Kimley-Horn can also provide Mitigation Monitoring implementation services to ensure a project’s compliance with applicable measures as well as conditions of approval. Noticing Kimley-Horn will be responsible for all CEQA noticing including the preparation and distribution of the Notice of Preparation, Notice of Availability, Scoping Meeting notices, Notice of Completion, and Notice of Determination. We can also prepare newspaper notices . Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Preparation Kimley-Horn’s approach to preparing key sections of the IS/MND is similar to the discussion set forth above for an EIR preparation, although the amount of detail in the existing conditions and impact analyses is appropriately reduced to address the specifics of the project. Sections not required for an IS/MND include, but are not limited to, a discussion of the Project Objectives, the Alternatives analyses, discussions of Significant Irreversible impacts, Growth- Inducing impacts, and the Cumulative analyses (except where explicitly required by a threshold of significance). Kimley-Horn will prepare the Screencheck IS/MND and submit the document electronically (e.g., PDF and Word) for review and comment. Once comments have been received, Kimley-Horn will prepare a second IS/MND, and then an Approval Draft, for final review and approval for public distribution. Project Management and Meetings For all projects, Kimley-Horn’s level of participation in meetings will be based on the preferences of the City’s Project Manager. Scopes of Work can be prepared to include a wide variety of participation in conference calls and meetings. We would be responsible for managing the CEQA process for the City, including ongoing Project Team coordination to ensure compliance with the Scope of Work, budget, and schedule, and to disseminate project information in a timely manner, resulting in consistent information for all technical reports. Kimley-Horn will be available to participate in public information meetings at the request of the City. At public meetings, Kimley- Horn will be available to answer questions on the EIR and environmental analysis and facilitate information sharing through visual graphics and/or PowerPoint presentations. Importantly, Kimley-Horn will be available to attend all public hearings (e.g. Planning Commission, City Council) and meetings with applicable jurisdictions/responsible agencies, and answer questions related to the CEQA documentation. All Kimley-Horn Team members are experienced and adept at providing helpful technical responses and clarifications for decision-makers at public meetings and hearings, and at making presentations at public hearings. Public Scoping/Community Outreach Stakeholder engagement and involvement is an integral part of almost every Kimley-Horn planning project. Residents, business, state and federal agencies, environmental interest groups, and the interested community-at-large are an important part of identifying issues of concern, helping define alternatives, and ultimately supporting the direction the project will take. By providing these parties with meaningful ways to provide input into the planning process, key issues can be addressed early in the project, avoiding critical delays later. 215 City of Moorpark | EVOC77010.19 21 Kimley-Horn routinely prepares materials and facilitates public outreach programs including community workshops and charrettes, public scoping meetings, public hearings, and briefings to elected officials, committees, and City staff. For some projects, workshops, meetings, and/or targeted outreach efforts may be appropriate to provide a forum for meaningful community input and effectively instill the public with a sense of “partnering” and “ownership” in the process. The Kimley-Horn project team include s skilled professionals that can effectively facilitate public meetings and conduct presentations on the environmental process and/or required technical analyses. Our staff has lead extensive public outreach programs involving numerous agencies. Our professional staff includes fluent Spanish speakers and Chinese (Cantonese; Mandarin) speakers who can provide real-time translation services for community engagement activities as well for written materials. PROJECT MANAGER Dana C. Privitt, AICP QC/QA Rita Garcia Air Quality/Greenhouse Gas/ Noise/Energy Ace Malisos Jared Stine, P.E. Noemi Wyss Transportation Sri Chakravarthy, P.E., T.E. Community Outreach /Engagement David Barquist, AICP Nick Chen, AICP Water Quality and Drainage Jason Marechal, P.E., LEEP AP Phase I Environmental Site Assessments Jennifer Steen Visual Simulations and Shade/Shadow Bobby Valentine Nick Chen, AICP Water and Wastewater Utility Infrastructure Aryo Rad, P.E. Regulatory Compliance Marcy Kamerath, CPSWQ, QSD/P Karina Fidler, AICP, CPESC Fire Hazard Assessments/Fuel Modifi cation/Biological Resources Dudek Cultural Resources ASM Affi liates Farmland Land Evaluation and Site Assessment Matt Horton, AICP Kari Cano Brian Leung Geoff rey Bishop Meghan Karadimos Ruben Salas Karina Fidler, AICP, CPESC Casey Schooner John Fyne-Nsofor Josh Cortez, LEED GA Brad Stoneman Alex Jewell, AICP, LEED AP POLICY PLANNING AND SPECIFIC PLANS David Barquist, AICP Nick Chen, AICP Margit Allen, AICP TECHNICAL STUDIES AND SERVICES CEQA/NEPA STAFF KEY PERSONNEL 216 City of Moorpark | EVOC77010.19 24 3. References Kimley-Horn understands that real collaboration requires far more than a partnership—it also means earning deep trust by living up to our promises day in and day out. Our clients consistently tell us that Kimley-Horn provides a better experience. That’s the truth behind our reputation—with Kimley-Horn, you can expect more and experience better. We are proud of the projects we have worked on and the relationships we have built with our clients. Kimley-Horn invites the City of Moorpark to contact our references to ask about their experiences and working relationships with us. We are confident these clients will confirm our ability to provide quality projects, personal attention, and exceptional service. 💠MainPlace Mall Transformation Project, Santa Ana Description of Services: Kimley-Horn is preparing technical studies to support the City of Santa Ana’s preparation of CEQA documentation for the reuse of the existing MainPlace Mall. Technical studies prepared by our firm are as follows: air quality, health risk assessment, greenhouse gas emissions, noise and vibration, traffic, parking, hydrology, water quality, and water supply assessment. Kimley-Horn also is preparing the Specific Plan and civil engineering support services. MainPlace Mall has evolved over several decades from the original Fashion Square project approved in 1983, to the present mall of approximately 1,130,000 square feet of commercial uses. The site has not yet been developed to its full potential; existing entitlements allow for the additional development of up to 1,500,000 square feet of office use, 400 hotel rooms, and additional commercial square footage. The developer wishes to modify the entitlements to allow more flexibility in the further development of the site, reducing the allowed office and retail uses and adding residential uses. As proposed, the project would decrease the currently entitled office and commercial uses, retain the same number of hotel rooms, and introduce up to 1,900 multifamily residential units. 📞Contact: Ali Pezeshkpour, AICP, Senior Planner City of Santa Ana, 714.667.5883 APezeshkpour@santa-ana.org 💠Encinitas 2013-2021 Housing Element Update and Environmental Assessment, Encinitas Kimley-Horn assisted the City of Encinitas in preparation of the Housing Element Update and the Environmental Assessment to address 17 candidate sites (36 parcels). The proposed amendments were intended to accommodate the City’s remaining Regional Housing Needs Assessment (RHNA) allocation based on the candidate sites’ maximum realistic yield. The project proposed various conforming amendments to the Encinitas General Plan, Encinitas Zoning Code, Local Coastal Plan, Specific Plans, and ancillary amendments to other planning documents. Rita managed the Environmental Assessment that addressed the candidate sites and provided a comparative analysis to the prior Housing Element Program EIR. Dana was the QC/QA manager. 📞Contact: Brenda Wisneski, Development Services Director, City of Encinitas, 760.633.2712 bwisneski@encinitasca.gov 💠Koll Center Residences EIR, Newport Beach Kimley-Horn is preparing a project-level EIR for a mixed-use infill residential and retail development project near John Wayne Airport. The project would allow for 260 residential units, 3,000 square feet of retail uses, and a 1.2-acre public park. The project would be constructed on a surface parking lot within an existing business office park. 📞Contact: Rosalinh Ung, Senior Planner City of Newport Beach, 949.644.3208, rung@newportbeachca.gov 💠600 West Commonwealth Avenue Mixed-Use Specific Plan and IS/MND, Fullerton Kimley-Horn prepared a Specific Plan and IS/MND for an infill mixed-use development in the City of Fullerton. Project implementation required a General Plan Amendment, zone change, Major Site Plan approval. Issues of concern included land use compatibility including massing, and parking and traffic. 📞Contact: Matt Foulkes, Planning Manager City of Fullerton, 714.738.6878 MattF@ci.fullerton.ca.us 217 City of Moorpark | EVOC77010.19 25 4. Cost Proposal KIMLEY-HORN Rate Schedule Classification Labor Rate* (per hour) Analyst I $110 - $120 Analyst II $120 - $140 Professional I $140 - $170 Professional II $170 - $200 Senior Professional I $200 - $250 Senior Professional II $250 - $300 Principal/Senior Technical Expert $300 - $340 Project Support $100 - $140 Administrative Support $90 - $110 Effective through June 30, 2020 *Billing Rates are reviewed yearly and are adjusted on July 1st of each year by up to 5% to reflect market conditions. Other Direct Costs: Outside Printing/Reproduction, Delivery Services/USPS, Misc. Field Equipment/Supplies, and Travel Expenses will be billed at cost plus 10%. Mileage will be billed at the federal Rate. Subconsultants: Billed at cost plus 10% ASM AFFILIATES Classification Hourly Rate Project Manager III $150.00 Project Manager II $138.00 Project Manager I $131.00 Senior Archaeologist III $120.00 Senior Archaeologist II $115.00 Senior Archaeologist I $105.00 Senior Historian II $106.00 Senior Historian I $95.00 Architectural Historian III $105.00 Architectural Historian II $97.00 Architectural Historian I $85.00 Associate Archaeologist III $95.00 Associate Archaeologist II $85.00 Associate Archaeologist I $80.00 Assistant Archaeologist III $78.00 Assistant Archaeologist II $75.00 Assistant Archaeologist I $72.00 Archaeological Crew III $70.00 Archaeological Crew II $65.00 Archaeological Crew I $57.00 GIS Administrator II $110.00 GIS Administrator I $90.00 Graphics Supervisor $81.00 Word Processor II $73.00 Word Processor I $54.00 Accountant $90.00 Admin Associate II $73.00 Admin Associate I $56.00 Records/Title Search At Cost Artifact Curation At Cost GPR Rental $500/day 218 City of Moorpark | EVOC77010.19 26 DUDEK 2019 STANDARD SCHEDULE OF CHARGES Effective January 1, 2019 ENGINEERING SERVICES Project Director .............................................................................. $285.00/hr Principal Engineer lll ...................................................................... $265.00/hr Principal Engineer II ...................................................................... $255.00/hr Principal Engineer I ....................................................................... $245.00/hr Program Manager .......................................................................... $225.00/hr Senior Project Manager ................................................................. $225.00/hr Project Manager ............................................................................ $220.00/hr Senior Engineer III ......................................................................... $215.00/hr Senior Engineer II ......................................................................... $205.00/hr Senior Engineer I .......................................................................... $195.00/hr Project Engineer IV/Technician IV ................................................. $185.00/hr Project Engineer llI/Technician III .................................................. $175.00/hr Project Engineer lI/Technician II .................................................... $160.00/hr Project Engineer I/Technician I ...................................................... $145.00/hr Project Coordinator ........................................................................ $115.00/hr Engineering Assistant ....................................................................$110.00/hr ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES Project Director .............................................................................. $245.00/hr Senior Specialist IV ....................................................................... $230.00/hr Senior Specialist III ........................................................................ $220.00/hr Senior Specialist II ......................................................................... $200.00/hr Senior Specialist I .......................................................................... $190.00/hr Specialist V .................................................................................... $180.00/hr Specialist IV ................................................................................... $170.00/hr Specialist III ................................................................................... $160.00/hr Specialist II .................................................................................... $145.00/hr Specialist I ..................................................................................... $130.00/hr Analyst V ....................................................................................... $120.00/hr Analyst IV ...................................................................................... $110.00/hr Analyst III ....................................................................................... $100.00/hr Analyst II .......................................................................................... $90.00/hr Analyst I ........................................................................................... $80.00/hr Technician IV ................................................................................... $90.00/hr Technician III ................................................................................... $80.00/hr Technician II .................................................................................... $70.00/hr Technician I ..................................................................................... $60.00/hr Compliance Monitor ......................................................................... $95.00/hr DATA MANAGEMENT SERVICES GIS Programmer I ......................................................................... $185.00/hr GIS Specialist IV ............................................................................ $160.00/hr GIS Specialist III ............................................................................ $150.00/hr GIS Specialist II ............................................................................. $140.00/hr GIS Specialist I .............................................................................. $130.00/hr Data Analyst III .............................................................................. $100.00/hr Data Analyst II ................................................................................. $90.00/hr Data Analyst I .................................................................................. $80.00/hr UAS Pilot ......................................................................................... $90.00/hr CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT SERVICES Principal/Manager .......................................................................... $195.00/hr Senior Construction Manager ....................................................... $180.00/hr Senior Project Manager ................................................................. $165.00/hr Construction Manager ................................................................... $155.00/hr Project Manager ............................................................................ $145.00/hr Resident Engineer ............................................................ …….….$145.00/hr Construction Engineer ................................................................... $140.00/hr On-site Owner’s Representative .................................................... $140.00/hr Construction Inspector III ............................................................... $130.00/hr Construction Inspector II ................................................................ $120.00/hr Construction Inspector I ................................................................. $110.00/hr Prevailing Wage Inspector ............................................................. $135.00/hr HYDROGEOLOGICAL SERVICES Project Director .............................................................................. $285.00/hr Principal Hydrogeologist/Engineer II .............................................. $260.00/hr Principal Hydrogeologist/Engineer I ............................................... $240.00/hr Sr. Hydrogeologist IV/Engineer IV ................................................ $225.00/hr Sr. Hydrogeologist III/Engineer III .................................................. $210.00/hr Sr. Hydrogeologist II/Engineer II .................................................... $195.00/hr Sr. Hydrogeologist I/Engineer I ...................................................... $185.00/hr Hydrogeologist VI/Engineer VI ...................................................... $165.00/hr Hydrogeologist V/Engineer V......................................................... $155.00/hr Hydrogeologist IV/Engineer IV ....................................................... $145.00/hr Hydrogeologist III/Engineer III ....................................................... $135.00/hr Hydrogeologist II/Engineer II ......................................................... $125.00/hr Hydrogeologist I/Engineer I ........................................................... $115.00/hr Technician ..................................................................................... $100.00/hr DISTRICT MANAGEMENT & OPERATIONS District General Manager ............................................................... $195.00/hr District Engineer ............................................................................ $185.00/hr Operations Manager ..................................................................... $160.00/hr District Secretary/Accountant ....................................................... $120.00/hr Collections System Manager ......................................................... $135.00/hr Grade V Operator .......................................................................... $125.00/hr Grade IV Operator ......................................................................... $110.00/hr Grade III Operator ......................................................................... $100.00/hr Grade II Operator ............................................................................ $75.00/hr Grade I Operator ............................................................................. $70.00/hr Operator in Training ......................................................................... $65.00/hr Collection Maintenance Worker II .................................................... $75.00/hr Collection Maintenance Worker I ..................................................... $65.00/hr OFFICE SERVICES Technical/Drafting/CADD Services 3D Graphic Artist ........................................................................... $175.00/hr Senior Designer ............................................................................. $165.00/hr Designer ........................................................................................ $155.00/hr Assistant Designer ......................................................................... $150.00/hr CADD Operator III ......................................................................... $145.00/hr CADD Operator II .......................................................................... $140.00/hr CADD Operator I ........................................................................... $125.00/hr CADD Drafter ................................................................................ $115.00/hr CADD Technician .......................................................................... $110.00/hr SUPPORT SERVICES Technical Editor lll ......................................................................... $145.00/hr Technical Editor ll .......................................................................... $130.00/hr Technical Editor l ........................................................................... $115.00/hr Publications Specialist lll ............................................................... $105.00/hr Publications Specialist ll .................................................................. $95.00/hr Publications Specialist l ................................................................... $85.00/hr Clerical Administration ..................................................................... $90.00/hr Forensic Engineering – Court appearances, depositions, and interrogatories as expert witness will be billed at 2.00 times normal rates. Emergency and Holidays – Minimum charge of two hours will be billed at 1.75 times the normal rate. Material and Outside Services – Subcontractors, rental of special equipment, special reproductions and blueprinting, outside data processing and computer services, etc., are charged at 1.15 times the direct cost. Travel Expenses – Mileage at current IRS allowable rates. Per diem where overnight stay is involved is charged at cost Invoices, Late Charges – All fees will be billed to Client monthly and shall be due and payable upon receipt. Invoices are delinquent if not paid within 30 days from the date of the invoice. Client agrees to pay a monthly late charge equal to 1% per month of the outstanding balance until paid in full. Annual Increases – Unless identified otherwise, these standard rates will increase 3% annually. 219 City of Moorpark | EVOC77010.19 27 Dana Privitt, AICP Project Manager Dana is an environmental planner with more than 30 years of private-sector and public-sector experience focused on CEQA environmental analysis and peer review, project management, staff support services, and planning documentation for multi-issue development projects and infrastructure projects. She specializes in the strategic guidance, preparation, and peer review of CEQA/NEPA documents. Her projects include large and small-scale urban infill and greenfield developments; public infrastructure; policy programs; and public-sector support staff services. Dana has conducted CEQA training in coordination with the Association of Environmental Professionals (AEP), as well as for Newport Beach and the University of California, Irvine (UCI). Dana has managed and prepared several EIRs that were prepared under the threat of litigation. Relevant Experience On-Call for Environmental Services, City of Los Angeles – Project Manager On-Call for Environmental Impact Reports, Simi Valley – Project Manager On-Call for Environmental Services, Long Beach – Project Manager On-Call for Environmental Services, Pico Rivera – Project Manager On-Call for Environmental and Planning Services, Santa Ana – Project Manager Planning, Environmental, and Cultural Resources Services, County of Riverside – QC/QA Reviewer On-Call for Environmental Impact Analysis Services, Irvine – Project Manager On-Call for Environmental Services, University of California, Irvine – Project Manager On-Call for Environmental Services, Huntington Beach – Project Manager On-Call for Environmental and Planning, Fontana – QC/QA Reviewer Moorpark Civic Center Campus Program EIR, Moorpark – Project Manager* North Park Village and Nature Preserve Specific Plan Program EIR, Moorpark – Project Manager* Hidden Creek Ranch Specific Plan No. 8 EIR and Staff Support Services, Moorpark – Project Manager* Koll Center Residences Mixed-Use Development EIR, Newport Beach – Project Manager Ford Road Residential IS/MND, Newport Beach – Project Manager MainPlace Transformation Project, Santa Ana – Technical Studies Manager, QC/QA Calvary Church Master Plan IS/MND, Santa Ana – Project Manager Greystar Senior Housing CEQA Section 15183 Analysis, San Clemente – Project Manager Brea Place Mixed-Use Development Addendum to the General Plan EIR, Brea – Project Manager Red Hill Avenue Specific Plan EIR, Tustin – CEQA Project Manager Yorba Linda General Plan Update and Program EIR, Yorba Linda – CEQA Project Manager Loma Vista Residential Addendum to the Housing Element EIR, Yorba Linda – Project Manager Professional Credentials • Bachelor of Science, Social Ecology, University of California, Irvine • American Institute of Certified Planners (AICP) # No. 9036 5. Additional Information 220 City of Moorpark | EVOC77010.19 28 City of Encinitas Housing Element Update Environmental Assessment, Encinitas – QC/QA Downtown/Old Town Indio Specific Plan Update Program EIR, Indio – CEQA Project Manager Ramona Boulevard/Valley Boulevard Intersection Improvements IS/MND, El Monte – Project Manager Imjin Parkway Improvement Project CEQA/NEPA, Marina – Project Manager Gene Autry Way Improvement Project Addendum to the Platinum Triangle EIR, Anaheim – CEQA Project Manager Whittier Boulevard Specific Plan Amendment Addendum to the Whittier Boulevard Specific Plan Supplemental Final EIR, Whittier – QC/QA Manager Newport Banning Ranch EIR, Newport Beach – Principal-in-Charge and Project Manager* 600 West Commonwealth Avenue Mixed-Use In-Fill Development Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND), Fullerton – Project Manager 6 Polaris Way Office Development IS/MND, Aliso Viejo – Project Manager Soka University Addendum, Aliso Viejo – Project Manager 4 Liberty Planning Analysis, Aliso Viejo – Project Manager Irvine Waterpark Addendum to the Great Park EIR, Irvine – Project Manager Niagara Water Bottling Production and Distribution Facility Addendum to the Renaissance Specific Plan Final EIR, Rialto – Project Manager Southern California Edison Niagara Substation IS/MND, Rialto – Project Manager Newport Executive Center Addendum, Newport Beach – Project Manager 234 West Hyde Park Boulevard Manufacturing/Warehouse Project IS/MND, Inglewood – Project Manager *Prior to joining Kimley-Horn 221 City of Moorpark | EVOC77010.19 29 Professional Credentials • Bachelor of Science, Urban and Regional Planning, California State Polytechnic University, Pomona • American Planning Association (APA), Member • Association of Environmental Professionals (AEP), Member Rita Garcia QC/QA Manager With nearly 30 years of experience, Rita has provided environmental and planning services to a broad range of public and private sector clients. Rita has specialized in providing quality assurance and managing and contributing to CEQA/NEPA documents and regulatory permitting for a broad range of projects, including various projects involving undeveloped hillside properties, as well as Specific Plans. She has been involved with varied development and redevelopment, and facility and infrastructure projects in sensitive environments, with substantial public involvement and controversy. Having served in various capacities as Applicant, City Staff, and Consultant, she contributes unique perspectives and approaches to navigating challenging planning and regulatory environments. Ms. Garcia routinely and effectively interacts with federal and local regulatory agencies on behalf of her clients, including through project workshop and public hearing presentations. Relevant Experience Housing Element Update Environmental Assessment, Encinitas – Project Manager The Lakes Specific Plan EIR Environmental Clearance, El Segundo – Project Manager Monterey Downs, Monterey Horse Park, and Central Coast Veterans Cemetery SP EIR, Seaside – Project Manager* Cambria Community Services District (CCSD) Water Master Plan Program EIR, Cambria – Project Manager* CCSD On-Call Services, >20 Years Water/Wastewater/Recreational Environmental and Planning Studies, Cambria – Project Manager and Senior Analyst* Doheny Ocean Desalination Project EIR, South Coast Water District – Senior Analyst General Plan Update Program EIRs/MND, Artesia, Buena Park, Fullerton, Hawaiian Gardens, Lancaster, Murrieta, Villa Park – Project Manager* Housing Element Update EIRs, Palmdale and City of Riverside – Project Manager and Senior Analyst* Housing Element Update IS/MNDs, Anaheim, Fontana, Fullerton, Gilroy, Indio, Los Alamitos, Montclair, Orange, Placentia, Stanton – Project Manager* Upland General Plan Update, Zoning Code Update, Climate Action Plan, and Cable Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan Program EIR, Upland – Project Manager* Park Place Extension and Grade Separation Project Administrative Draft EA/EIR, El Segundo – Project Manager and Senior Environmental Analyst* Laguna Canyon Creek Erosion Control and Restoration Project, Laguna Beach – Project Manager* Newport Beach Zoning Code Update IS/MND, Newport Beach – Project Manager* Santiago Creek Bike Trail North IS/MND, Orange – Project Manager* Esperanza Hills Draft EIR Peer Review, Yorba Linda – Project Manager* Boeing Specific Plan Program EIR, Seal Beach – Project Manager* *Prior to joining Kimley-Horn 222 City of Moorpark | EVOC77010.19 30 Professional Credentials • Master of Science, Civil Engineering, Louisiana State University • Bachelor of Science, Civil Engineering, Kakatiya University, India • Professional Engineer in California #73629 • Traffic Engineer in California #2531 Sri Chakravarthy, P.E., T.E. Transportation Sri is a professional civil and traffic engineer with more than 15 years of experience in traffic engineering and transportation planning related to mobility elements of general plans, specific plans, public works, corridor evaluations, intersection improvements, traffic signal design, signal timing, and ITS. He has managed both small and large projects for clients throughout Southern California. As a senior project engineer, Sri has been a key staff member for many transportation planning projects as well as traffic signal control system design and implementation projects. His project management experience includes Complete Streets evaluations, traffic impact studies, roundabout design, corridor planning, community engagement and presentations, signal justification studies, school safety studies, site specific traffic circulation and safety studies, traffic signal operations, and traffic signal design. Relevant Experience Los Angeles Avenue Traffic Study, Moorpark – Project Manager U.S. 101/23 Interchange PS&E, Thousand Oaks – Project Manager Kanan/Agoura Intersection Improvements, Agoura Hills – Project Manager Lancaster Master Plan of Complete Streets, Lancaster – Project Manager Malibu On-Call Traffic Engineering Services, Malibu – Project Manager On-Call Traffic Engineering Services, Agoura Hills – Project Manager Huntington Beach, Parking/Traffic Consulting Services to Amend the Downtown Parking Master Plan, Huntington Beach – Project Engineer Ocean Park Blvd. Complete Green Streets Project, Santa Monica – Project Engineer Greater Tehachapi Area Specific Plan, Tehachapi – Project Manager Agoura Road Widening Project (Complete Streets), Agoura Hills – Project Engineer PCH Bike Route Improvements, Malibu – Project Manager 223 City of Moorpark | EVOC77010.19 31 Professional Credentials • Master of Arts, Urban and Regional Planning, University of California, Irvine • Bachelor of Arts, Environmental Studies, University of California, Santa Cruz • Bowlby and Associates, Inc, “FHWA Traffic Noise Model 2.5 Training Course” • Navcon Engineering Network, “SoundPLAN User Training” Ace Malisos Air Quality/Greenhouse Gas/Noise/Energy Ace provides technical analysis for Air Quality, Greenhouse Gas, and Noise as part of environmental documents for private development and public improvement projects. He has experience in research, preparation, and analysis consistent with CEQA for environmental planning projects involving redevelopment, infrastructure, residential, mixed use, institutional, and commercial uses. He is experienced in applying a full analysis methodology per EPA, CARB, Air Pollution Control District/Air Quality Management District, and Caltrans/FHWA guidelines. His expertise includes technical modeling experience using various state and federally approved programs including the California Emissions Estimator Model (CalEEMod), AERMOD, CALINE4, and EMFAC. He also provides a full range of noise impact analyses for public and private sector clients, in accordance with local, state, and federal impact assessment criteria, and develops integrated GIS-based maps depicting roadway noise contours and sensitive receptors. Relevant Experience Laurel Park at Moorpark Highlands Air Quality and Noise Studies, Moorpark– Environmental Specialist* University of California, Irvine, Air Quality/Noise/Greenhouse Gas On-Call Services, Irvine – Project Manager City of Tustin, Red Hill Corridor Specific Plan and EIR, Tustin – Environmental Specialist Sespe Creek Hydrology, Hydraulics and Sedimentation Analysis IS/MND, Fillmore – Environmental Specialist* Nickelodeon Office Building IS/MND, Burbank – Environmental Specialist* 550 North Third Street Hotel Project IS/MND, Burbank – Environmental Specialist* Canyon Country Community Center IS/MND, Santa Clarita – Environmental Specialist* Mancara at Robinson Ranch Environmental Impact Report, Santa Clarita – Environmental Specialist* San Fernando Downtown Infill Project EIR, San Fernando – Environmental Specialist* *Prior to joining Kimley-Horn 224 City of Moorpark | EVOC77010.19 32 Professional Credentials • Bachelor of Science, Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of California, Berkeley • Professional Engineer in California (#63164) • LEED AP, CA, National Jason Marechal, P.E., LEED AP Water Quality and Drainage Jason Marechal has 18 years of experience in civil engineering design and management, primarily focused on public and private land development projects. His technical expertise includes all civil design aspects of land development projects including grading, drainage, and utility design, along with extensive knowledge of hydrology and hydraulics, and water quality standards. Jason is well-versed in all of the recently updated Southern California post-construction water quality requirements, including the 2011 MS4 permits for both north and south Orange County. His innovative approach to drainage and water quality design includes experience with low-impact development (LID), hydromodification, green streets, and large watershed studies. He has worked extensively in all counties in Southern California and has successfully completed the design of several projects ranging from 1 acre to over 100 acres in size. Relevant Experience Valencia Commerce Center VTPM 18108, Santa Clarita – Project Manager La Habra Harbor/Lambert Intersection Widening, La Habra – Project Engineer Southbay Pavilion, Carson – Project Manager The Colonies Drainage Study, Upland – Technical Analyst Fresno Marketplace at El Paseo, Fresno – Project Manager Cesar Chavez Green Street, Los Angeles – Project Manager Lake Street Green Street, Burbank Water and Power, Burbank – Project Manager Brickyard Commerce Center (aka Compton Brickyard), Compton – Project Manager Brookfield Residential Properties, Amoruso Ranch Master Planned Community, Roseville – Project Engineer Douglas Park-Long Beach (Boeing), Long Beach – Project Engineer La Reina Court Alley Complete Streets Project (Green Street Design), Long Beach – Project Manager 225 City of Moorpark | EVOC77010.19 33 Professional Credentials • Bachelor of Science, Sociology, University of Illinois • Associate of Arts, Social Sciences, Saddleback College Jennifer Steen Phase I Environmental Site Assessments Jennifer Steen has nine years of progressive experience preparing Phase I Environmental Site Assessments for various types of land uses, including military installations, industrial facilities, commercial developments and vacant parcels. In addition, Jennifer has over ten years of experience with site development projects, including the preparation of Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plans and water quality technical reports. She has been responsible for providing entitlement planning and support for educational, residential, commercial, and institutional land development projects throughout California. Relevant Experience Phase I and Phase II Environmental Site Assessments, Walmart Stores, Various Locations –Analyst Phase I Environmental Site Assessments, SunEdison LLC, Various Locations – Analyst Boeing Fitness and Recreation Center, Canoga Park – Analyst Phase I and Phase II Environmental Site Assessments for Public and Private Development Projects, Various Locations – Analyst Phase I & II ESA, University of Southern California + Los Angeles County Hospital, Los Angeles – Analyst Phase I & II ESA, Confidential Industrial Use, Corona – Analyst Phase I & II ESA, Medline Industries, Rialto – Analyst 226 City of Moorpark | EVOC77010.19 34 Professional Credentials • Master of Science, Systems Engineering, Industrial Management Institute • Master of Science, Civil Engineering, California State University, Fullerton • Bachelor of Science, Civil Engineering, Azad University, Tehran • Professional Civil Engineer in California #81231 • Qualified SWPPP Developer/ Practitioner Aryo Rad, P.E., QSD/P Water and Wastewater Utility Infrastructure Aryo Rad has over 20 years of civil engineering and construction management experience related to municipal transportation, roadway, water resources and storm drain facilities. His range of experience includes engineering work in planning, permitting, design, bidding, and construction of roadways, bikeways, storm drains, water quality, potable and reclaimed water, and sanitary sewer projects in southern California specifically in Cities in Los Angeles, Orange, San Bernardino and Riverside Counties. He has led complex multidisciplinary transportation and utility projects with a track record of successful implementation. Aryo has experience in working with public works and planning departments for more than 20 municipalities in southern California and assisting them with their Capital Improvement Projects. Aryo’s expertise in developing and implementing creative, cost effective and sustainable solutions for municipal infrastructure projects is directly applicable to the improvements proposed for the City’s on-call program. Relevant Experience Ramona Blvd. at Valley Blvd. Intersection Improvements, El Monte – Project Manager Gene Autry Way Improvements and State College Blvd. Improvements, Anaheim – QC Manager Santa Ana Blvd. and 5th Street Protected Bike Lane PS&E, Santa Ana – QC Manager Lincoln Neighborhood Corridor Streetscape, Santa Monica – QC/QA Reviewer and Sustainability Task Lead South Main Street Corridor Improvements, Santa Ana – Project Manager Cliffwood Industrial Street Rehabilitation; Alley Rehabilitation and Cliffwood Water Main Replacement Projects, Brea – Project Manager* Fairmont Boulevard Widening, Anaheim – Project Engineer* Various Street Improvement Projects, Lynwood – Project Manager* *Prior to joining Kimley-Horn 227 City of Moorpark | EVOC77010.19 35 Professional Credentials • Master of Science, Natural Resource and Environmental Science, University of Nevada, Reno • Bachelor of Science, Biology, University of Nevada, Reno • Certified Professional in Storm Water Quality (#1075) • Qualified SWPPP Developer/ Practitioner (#25875) • American Water Resources Association, Member Marcy Kamerath, CPSWQ, QSD/P Regulatory Compliance Marcy is an environmental scientist with ten years of experience in regulatory compliance, watershed science, and project delivery. She has professional experience as a researcher, regulator, and consultant. Her objectives are to assist clients with regulatory compliance strategies for capital improvement and development projects, and to contribute to revitalization projects and regional planning efforts that improve mobility, economy, and community. Marcy has experience leading and managing the delivery of various technical studies prepared to meet CEQA/NEPA and environmental permitting requirements. Marcy helps clients strategize on how to manage and plan for impacts to environmental resources and works with agencies to negotiate and obtain permits so projects can move to construction. Relevant Experience BART Silicon Valley (BSV) Phase II Program Management, Planning, and Environmental Compliance Services, Santa Clara County – Environmental Planner BART Phase II Station Access / Transit Oriented Communities Study, Santa Clara County – Environmental Planner Vine Trail Coalition, Napa Valley Vine Trail, Calistoga to St. Helena – Environmental Scientist East Bay Regional Park District, Tilden Nature Area Sediment Basin Excavation and Pond Restoration, Contra Costa County – Project Manager* East Bay Regional Park District, San Francisco Bay Trail at Point Molate, Richmond – Senior Scientist* City of Half Moon Bay Public Works, Seymour Ditch Emergency Stabilization, Half Moon Bay – Senior Scientist* City of Richmond Public Works Department, Local Assistance Compliance (E-76) for Yellow Brick Road, Richmond – Senior Scientist* *Prior to Kimley-Horn 228 City of Moorpark | EVOC77010.19 36 Professional Credentials • Bachelor of Science, City and Regional Planning, California Polytechnic State University - San Luis Obispo • Association for Unmanned Vehicle Systems International (UAVSI), Member • Private Pilot • Part 107 Drone Pilot Bobby Valentine Visual Simulations and Shade/Shadow Bobby is a 27-year veteran in the fields of 3-D modeling, project visualization, animation, computer graphics, video production, media, and reality capture using drones and LiDAR technologies. He is skilled in shade and shadow design and has experience providing solutions for government and commercial customers using a variety of technologies, as well as managing artists and technical staff who design, build, and animate computer-generated communication content. Bobby has prepared 3-D models and photo-simulations for roadway, bridge, lighting, residential, and commercial projects in California and nationwide. Relevant Experience Anaheim Rapid Connection (ARC) Streetcar, Anaheim – Graphic Designer Gillespie Field El Cajon Air Center, San Diego County – Graphic Designer Scotts Valley Housing Element Update, Santa Cruz County – Graphic Designer Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority, Silicon Valley Berryessa Extension (SVBX) Station Campuses, Roadways, and Parking Facilities, Santa Clara County – Graphic Designer Johnny Cash Trail - Phase Two, Folsom – Graphic Designer Gilbert Regional Park Master Plan, Gilbert, AZ – Graphic Designer Pima County El Corazon Bank Protection and River Park Project, Tucson, AZ – Graphic Designer Park Circle Pedestrian Improvement Project, Aspen, CO – Graphic Designer Denver Premium Outlets, Denver, CO – Graphic Designer 229 City of Moorpark | EVOC77010.19 37 Professional Credentials • Master of Urban and Regional Planning, University of Minnesota • Bachelor of Arts, Geography and History, Minor in Political Science, Gustavus Adolphus College • American Institute of Certified Planners Matt Horton, AICP Farmland Land Evaluation and Site Assessment Matt is a planner with experience in land use planning, parking, mobility planning, and GIS analysis. Matt specializes in the development of community plans that thoughtfully consider the interrelationship between mobility and land use. His time at Kimley-Horn has been focused on improving public policy decision making through spatial analytics, scenario planning, and geographic information systems. Relevant Experience Private Development Land Evaluation and Site Assessment, Rancho Cucamonga – GIS Specialist Private Development Land Evaluation and Site Assessment, Placentia – GIS Specialist Corridor Planning II Process Zoning Code and Map Update for the General Plan 2030 Update, Santa Cruz – Analyst Red Hill Corridor Specific Plan and EIR, Tustin – GIS Specialist Housing Element Update, Encinitas – GIS Specialist Trolley Program Feasibility Study, Carlsbad – Project Manager University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) Parking Demand Study, Los Angeles – Project Manager SANDAG, San Diego and Western Riverside Counties Regional Park & Ride Strategy, San Diego/ Western Riverside – Project Manager On-Call Civil and Traffic Engineering, 2011, 2013, 2015, Ongoing, Carlsbad – Project Planner Parking Management Plan, Village and Barrio, Carlsbad – Project Planner Active Transportation Program (ATP), Palmdale – Project Planner 230 City of Moorpark | EVOC77010.19 38 Professional Credentials • Master of Arts, Political Science, California State University, Fullerton • Bachelor of Arts, Political Science, California State University, Fullerton Kari Cano CEQA/NEPA Staff Kari has over 13 years of experience in preparing and managing environmental and planning studies for public and private sector clients, under CEQA and NEPA. Kari comes to the field of planning/environmental planning from a diverse background in urban development and political science. Utilizing her background and understanding of State and local policies, Kari provides CEQA compliance review and environmental documentation, in addition to research, analysis, and writing. She has worked on projects in cities and counties throughout California. Relevant Experience On-Call for Environmental Planning Services, Fontana – Project Manager On-Call for Environmental Planning Services, Redlands – Project Manager On-Call for Environmental Planning Services, Menifee – Project Manager On-Call for Environmental Planning Services, County of San Bernardino – Project Manager* On-Call for Environmental Planning Services, Palm Springs – Project Manager* Tracy Hills Specific Plan EIR, Tracy – Environmental Planner Butterfield Specific Plan EIR, Banning – Environmental Planner Hacienda at Fairview Valley, Apple Valley – Assistant Project Manager Downtown Sierra Madre Specific Plan and Program EIR, Sierra Madre – Contributing Planner Adelina by William Lyon Homes EIR, Fontana – Assistant Project Manager Lytle Creek Apartments EIR, Fontana – Assistant Project Manager Grapevine at Sierra EIR, Fontana – Assistant Project Manager Ridgeline Commercial Development, San Bernardino – Project Manager Arrow Recovery Warehouse, Fontana – Project Manager Serena Park EIR Peer Review, Palm Springs – Project Manager Oasis Park IS/MND, Community of Oasis – Project Manager Oak View Estates EIR, Bradbury – CEQA Task Manager Deep Creek Homes EIR, San Bernardino County – Project Manager Bloomington Business Center EIR, San Bernardino County – Project Manager Western Realco EIR, San Bernardino County – Project Manager Earvin Magic Johnson Recreation Park Master Plan EIR, Los Angeles County – CEQA Task Manager San Sevaine Trail IS/MND, Fontana – Project Manager *Prior to joining Kimley-Horn 231 City of Moorpark | EVOC77010.19 39 Professional Credentials • Bachelor of Science, Urban and Regional Planning, California State Polytechnic University, Pomona • American Institute of Certified Planners (AICP) #136746 David Barquist, AICP Community Outreach and Engagement Dave has more than 20 years of public and private sector planning experience including extensive work with policy and program analysis for local and regional Housing Elements, comprehensive planning, local government policy and development, and environmental analysis. An expert in crafting local government policy, Dave has managed numerous complex planning programs, including General Plans, Specific Plans, Zoning Codes, and Development Code updates. His planning expertise includes policy analysis and development, urban design, downtown revitalization, parks and recreation planning, sustainability, and land use analysis. Dave has been an instructor at California State Fullerton’s Urban Planning Certificate Program and Leadership Development for Public Agencies program for the last 10 years, teaching public agency staff on principals of communication and group facilitation. He excels in utilizing community engagement and public outreach programs to guide public policy development and has led hundreds of public meetings. Dave is well-versed in finding locally-specific techniques and tools— and in developing multimedia and interactive technology applications—to engage the community in the planning process. Relevant Experience Active Transportation Program (ATP), Palmdale – Project Manager On-Call Civil Engineering Professional Services, San Bernardino County – Public Involvement Specialist Downtown/Old Town Indio Specific Plan Update EIR and Community Outreach, Indio – Project Manager Scotts Valley General Plan, EIR, and Climate Action Plan, Scotts Valley – Project Planner Yorba Linda General Plan Update and Community Outreach and Parks and Recreation Master Plan, Yorba Linda – Project Manager Whitter Boulevard Specific Plan Moratorium Analysis and Addendum, Whitter – Project Manager Ramona Boulevard at Valley Boulevard Intersection Improvement Project, El Monte – Project Planner Red Hill Avenue Specific Plan and EIR, Tustin – Project Planner Housing Element Update, Encinitas – Project Manager Community Planning and Design Services, Winchester – Project Manager 232 City of Moorpark | EVOC77010.19 40 Professional Credentials • Master of Landscape Architecture, California State Polytechnic University, Pomona • Bachelor of Arts, Biology, University of California, San Diego • American Institute of Certified Planners (AICP) #8688 Margit Allen, AICP Policy Planning and Specific Plans Margit has more than 30 years of experience with a wide range of planning experience encompassing a broad array of planning projects including specific plans, military reuse plans, general plans, design guidelines, development feasibility analysis, and entitlement processing. Margit’s experience includes management of numerous specific plan and other land use planning and entitlement efforts for both the public and private sector, as well as management into the construction phases. She possesses a background in policy planning, landscape architecture, current planning and land planning. Margit has extensive experience providing planning services as an extension of public agency staff. Relevant Experience Heritage Valley Parks, Phase 2, Fillmore – Project Planner Winchester Community Plan, Riverside County – Project Planner Veteran’s Industrial Specific Plan, March JPA, Riverside County – Project Manager Nelles Property Planner Extension of Staff, Whitter – Project Manager Avanti South Specific Plan, Lancaster – Project Manager Professional Credentials • Master, Urban and Regional Planning, University of California, Irvine • Bachelor of Landscape Architecture, Landscape Architecture, California State Polytechnic University, Pomona • American Institute of Certified Planners (AICP) #029082 Nicholas Chen, AICP Policy Planning and Community Outreach Nicholas Chen, AICP is a community planner and urban designer with experience engaging communities as a part of a wide range of planning efforts, from design and visioning to long-term strategic planning. His work includes urban design, community visioning, economic development plans, and several community outreach efforts in Los Angeles, San Bernardino, and Orange Counties, as well as on various projects across the nation. In addition to being AICP certified, he has completed the International Association of Public Professionals (IAP2) Foundations in Public Participations trainings and regularly conducts a range of community outreach efforts, including community meetings, open houses, design charrettes, and targeted stakeholder meetings. Relevant Experience Comprehensive Community Visioning, Redevelopment Program, Valdez, AK – Community Planner / Outreach Facilitator Winchester Community Plan, Winchester – Community Planner/ Outreach Facilitator City of Encinitas Housing Element Update, Encinitas – Policy Specialists/Outreach Facilitator Rancho Los Amigos South Campus Specific Plan, Downey - Community Planner/Facilitator MainPlace Mall Revitalization, Santa Ana – Entitlement Specialist County of San Bernardino Community Plans Continuum, San Bernardino County – Community Planner/Outreach Facilitator* Harrisburg Transportation Center TOD Plan, Harrisburg, PA – Urban Designer/Graphic Facilitator* *Prior to joining Kimley-Horn 233 City of Moorpark | EVOC77010.19 41 Professional Credentials • Bachelor of Science, Civil Engineering, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo • Professional Engineer in California #153068 Professional Affiliations • Association of Environmental Professionals (AEP) Jared Stine, P.E. Air Quality/Greenhouse Gas/Noise/Energy Jared is an engineer with experience in environmental planning and CEQA studies. His technical experience encompasses the preparation air quality, greenhouse gas, acoustical, health risk, and energy assessments. He is proficient in the use of ArcGIS, AutoCAD, California Emissions Estimator Model (CalEEMod), air quality dispersion modeling software (AERMOD), construction and traffic noise modeling (RCNM and TNM 2.5), as well as mobile source emissions inventories (EMFAC). Additionally, Jared has experience performing field investigations and producing technical CEQA documents for a variety of projects throughout the state of California. Relevant Experience Carlton Street Closure Initial Study, Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Technical Memorandum, Del Rey Oaks – Analyst Wright Solar Development, Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Technical Memorandum, Merced – Analyst Sycamore Residential and Sports Complex, Technical Studies (AQ/GHG/NOI), Upland – Analyst 7th and Center Warehouse, Technical Studies (AQ/GHG/NOI), Rancho Cucamonga – Analyst Rialto Annexation Bridge Point Warehouse, Technical Studies (AQ/GHG/NOI), Rialto – Analyst Bridge Point Industrial Warehouse, Technical Studies (AQ/GHG/NOI), Upland – Analyst Raising Cane’s Restaurant, Technical Studies (AQ/GHG/NOI), Corona – Analyst Rancho Tierra Residential, Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Assessments, El Dorado County – Analyst BNSF Ono Lead Track Extension, Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Assessments, San Bernardino – Analyst 234 City of Moorpark | EVOC77010.19 42 Professional Credentials • Master of Urban and Regional Planning, University of California, Irvine • Bachelor of Arts, International Relations, Boston University, Boston Noemi Wyss Air Quality/Greenhouse Gas/Noise/Energy Noemi has three years of experience in environmental planning, technical studies, Geographic Information Systems (GIS), CalEEMod, and Illustrator/InDesign. She has prepared numerous environmental documents in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) as well as Air Quality, Greenhouse Gas Emission, and Acoustical Assessments. She has conducted noise measurements and noise contour calculations. Noemi recently passed the AICP exam and is now an AICP Candidate. She has a background in environmental policy, with a focus on urban water policy. Relevant Experience Meridian Avenue General Plan Amendment Initial Study, San José – Environmental Planning Analyst Beech Avenue Extension, Initial Study, Fontana – Planning Analyst Vineyards at Deer Creek EIR, Brentwood – Environmental Planning Analyst Fairview at Northgate, Vallejo – Environmental Specialist Garden Gate Tower Supplemental EIR and Initial Study, San José, – Planning Analyst Red Hill Corridor Specific Plan EIR, Tustin – Planning Analyst Soka University EIR Addendum, Aliso Viejo – Planning Analyst Melia 178th Street Townhomes, Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Emission Technical Studies, Gardena – Environmental Analyst Slover Avenue Warehouse Project, Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Emission Analysis, Fontana – Environmental Analyst Mountain View Transit Air and GHG Technical Study, Mountain View – Environmental Analyst EF International, Air Quality Assessment, Greenhouse Gas Emissions Assessment and Acoustical Assessment, Costa Mesa – Environmental Analyst Westport Acoustical Study, Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas and Noise Technical Studies, Cupertino – Environmental Analyst 235 City of Moorpark | EVOC77010.19 43 Professional Credentials • Master of Public Health, Environmental Health, San Diego State University • Bachelor of Science, Biological Sciences, University of California, Santa Barbara • American Institute of Certified Planners (AICP) #020016 • Certified Professional in Erosion & Sediment Control (CPESC) #7165 Karina Fidler, AICP, CPESC CEQA/NEPA Staff Karina has more than 20 years of experience as an environmental planner providing field investigations and CEQA and NEPA documentation for public and private sector projects. She has completed numerous Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessments (ESA), Phase II ESAs, and environmental planning documents. Karina has coordinated extensively with the California Department of Fish and Wildlife, U.S. Fish and Wildlife, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, and the Regional Water Quality Control Boards on resource agency permits. She has also been involved with sensitive species surveys throughout the western U.S. including the western burrowing owl, least Bell’s vireo, California gnatcatcher, and pygmy owls. Relevant Experience Meridian (March AFB/March Business Center) Specific Plan and EIR, Riverside County – Environmental Planner and Biologist I-215/Van Buren PR/ED (LNR), Riverside County – Environmental Planner and Biologist County of Riverside Transportation, Sunset Avenue Railroad Grade Separation at I-10 PS&E, Banning – Environmental Planner Los Penasquitos Lagoon Sediment Basins MND, Los Penasquitos Lagoon Foundation, San Diego – Environmental Planner and Biologist Renaissance Specific Plan Amendment Subsequent EIR, Rialto – Environmental Planner I-80 Integrated Corridor Mobility (ICM) Project, Alameda/Contra Costa Counties – Environmental Planner and Biologist Intersection and Drainage Improvements at Frank Sinatra Drive and Portola Avenue, Palm Desert – Environmental Planner 236 City of Moorpark | EVOC77010.19 44 Professional Credentials • Bachelor of Science, Environmental Science and Management, University of California, Davis • Minor in Managerial Economics, University of California, Davis • American Planning Association (APA), Member Brian Leung CEQA/NEPA Staff Brian Leung has been in the environmental planning field for four years. He has assisted in the preparation of both Initial Studies leading to Mitigated Negative Declarations and EIRs for public and private sector clients under the CEQA. In addition to his work as a planning consultant, Brian has worked in County and State offices providing technical support and policy analysis in a variety of areas including greenhouse gas emissions/climate change, sustainability and waste reduction/diversion, and energy. Relevant Experience Washington Commerce Center East IS/MND, San Bernardino – Environmental Analyst Washington Commerce Center West IS/MND, San Bernardino – Environmental Analyst Carson Trucking Project IS/MND, Carson, CA– Environmental Analyst Encinitas 2013-2021 Housing Element Supplemental PEIR, Encinitas – Environmental Analyst City of Menifee Contract Staff Services, Menifee – Contract Planner Waterman South Distribution Center IS/MND, San Bernardino – Environmental Analyst Waterman East Distribution Center IS/MND, San Bernardino – Environmental Analyst Red Hill Avenue Specific Plan Program EIR, Tustin – Environmental Analyst Koll Center Residences EIR, Newport Beach – Environmental Analyst Doheny Desalination EIR, Dana Point – Environmental Analyst Ford Road Residential IS/MND, Newport Beach – Environmental Analyst Imjin Parkway Improvements IS/MND, Marina – Environmental Analyst Target Permit Processing, Various Locations – Environmental Analyst 237 City of Moorpark | EVOC77010.19 45 Professional Credentials • Bachelor of Science, Environmental Science, Biola University Geoffrey Bishop CEQA Staff Geoffrey Bishop has been in the environmental field for over five years working primarily on sustainable community development. Since entering the planning field, he has been responsible for preparing and managing environmental documents for private and public-sector clients under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). He comes to the environmental planning field with a diverse background in community development domestically and internationally, with an in-depth understanding of political and social structures globally. His experience includes the analysis and implementation of regenerative agriculture, solar, desalination, commercial, industrial, mixed-use, and residential projects in the counties of Los Angeles, Riverside, San Bernardino, Orange, and San Diego. He has also worked on projects in Southeast Asia, South America, East Africa, and Haiti. Relevant Experience Doheny Desalination EIR, Dana Point – Environmental Analyst Shea Ranch Norco IS/MND, Norco – Environmental Analyst Encinitas 2013-2021 Housing Element Supplemental PEIR, Encinitas – Environmental Analyst McCall Boulevard Retail Center IS/MND, Menifee – Environmental Analyst Calvary Church IS/MND, Santa Ana – Environmental Analyst Stonefield Townhome 63 IS/MND, Gardena – Environmental Analyst San Jacinto Downtown Specific Plan EIR, San Jacinto – Environmental Analyst Riverside County Ordinance #348 EIR, Riverside County – Environmental Analyst Irvine Waterpark Addendum to the Great Park EIR, Irvine – Environmental Analyst Greystar Housing CEQA 15183 Exemption, San Clemente – Environmental Analyst East Laurel Drive IS/MND, Salinas – Environmental Analyst 238 City of Moorpark | EVOC77010.19 46 Professional Credentials • Master of Urban and Regional Planning, California State Polytechnic University, Pomona • Bachelor of Arts, English, California State Polytechnic University, Pomona • American Planning Association (APA), Member • National Association of Environmental Planners, Member Ruben Salas CEQA/NEPA Staff Ruben has five years of combined environmental compliance (CEQA) experience. His experience ranges from commercial, residential, industrial developments, open space, mixed-use developments, redevelopments projects, general plan and community plan updates. His experience reaches outside of environmental compliance and into transportation planning, active transportation, and community outreach for both public and private sector clients. Relevant Experience The Retreat Residential Project IS/MND, Fontana – Environmental Analyst San Sevaine Trail IS/MND, Fontana – Environmental Analyst* Slover Warehouse Addendum EIR, Fontana – Environmental Analyst Monterado Residential Development IS/MND, Fontana – Environmental Analyst On-Call Environmental Planning Services, Redlands – Environmental Analyst On-Call Planning and Environmental Services, San Bernardino – Environmental Analyst Bloomington Industrial Facility Warehouse Development EIR, San Bernardino County – Environmental Analyst* San Bernardino County Community Plans Continuum, San Bernardino County – Environmental Analyst* Oasis Park IS/MND, Riverside County – Environmental Analyst* *Prior to Kimley-Horn Professional Credentials • Bachelor of Science, Environmental Science, Oregon State University, 2004 Meghan Karadimos CEQA/NEPA Staff Meghan has over 10 years of experience conducting biological and environmental analyses including preparation of NEPA-compliant Categorical Exclusions (CE), Environmental Assessments (EA), and associated technical reports. Meghan manages the Public Involvement (PI) process associated with environmental projects. She also performs hazardous materials investigations, economic and social impact analyses, origin-destination analyses, natural resource impact analyses, indirect and cumulative impacts (ICI) analyses, site reconnaissance activities, and NEPA document reviews. Relevant Experience Environmental Assessment, FM 2514 (Parker Rd) from FM 2551 to East of Lavon Pkwy, Cities of Parker, Lucas, Wylie, and Town of St. Paul, Collin County, TX – Environmental Scientist/PI Task Lead Categorical Exclusion, FM 2478 from Sam Rayburn Tollway (SH 121) to Stonebridge Drive, Cities of Frisco and McKinney, Collin County, TX – Environmental Scientist/PI Task Lead Final Environmental Impact Statement, Trinity Parkway from IH 35E/ SH 183 to US 175/ SH 310, City of Dallas, Dallas County, TX – Environmental Scientist 239 City of Moorpark | EVOC77010.19 47 Professional Credentials • Bachelor of Arts, Environmental Studies, University of California, Santa Barbara • American Institute of Certified Planners (AICP), #116000 • Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design Accredited Professional (LEED AP) Alex Jewell, AICP, LEED AP CEQA/NEPA Staff Alex Jewell has 23 years of experience processing land use applications through the environmental review process, including general plan amendments, specific plans, subdivisions, and use permits. His responsibilities include the preparation and review of environmental documents under CEQA, and other federal, State, and local laws, as well as coordinating reviews of technical studies and planning reviews of development applications. Relevant Experience Renaissance Specific Plan Amendment Subsequent EIR, Rialto – Environmental Planner City of San Diego Department of Parks and Recreation As-Needed Environmental Services, San Diego – Project Manager Nevada County Housing Element Rezone EIR, Grass Valley – Project Manager County of Placer Retirement Residence EIR, Roseville – Project Manager Moffett Towers 2 Traffic Impact Analysis and EIR, Sunnyvale – Project Manager Mary Avenue EIR, Sunnyvale – Project Manager New Electronic Message Center Sign EIR, Fountain Valley – Project Manager Truckee River Watershed CEQA Consult, Middle Truckee and Upper Little Truckee Watersheds Restoration Project, Truckee – Environmental Planner Surrey Farm Estates EIR, Los Gatos – Project Manager Tracy Crossroads Project, Tracy – Project Manager 240 City of Moorpark | EVOC77010.19 48 Professional Credentials • Bachelor of Arts, History, San Francisco State University Casey Schooner CEQA/NEPA Staff Casey Schooner has six years of progressive experience processing land use applications through the environmental review process, including general plan amendments, specific plans, and use permits. In addition, Casey has two years of experience with site development projects, including the preparation of Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plans and environmental planning documents for public and private sector projects and preparation of Phase I Environmental Site Assessments for various types of land uses, including, industrial facilities, commercial developments and vacant parcels. She has been responsible for providing entitlement planning and support for educational, residential, commercial and institutional land development projects throughout California. Relevant Experience Sand Hill Property Company, Vallco Shopping District Specific Plan, Cupertino – Environmental Analyst CEQA EIR, Confidential User, Sunnyvale – Environmental Analyst CEQA EIR, Confidential User, Vallejo – Environmental Analyst CEQA EIR, Confidential User, Brentwood – Environmental Analyst CEQA Supplemental EIR, Confidential User, Brentwood – Environmental Analyst CEQA EIR Addendum, Confidential User, Rialto – Environmental Analyst CEQA EIR Addendum, Confidential User, Chino – Environmental Analyst IPT I-215 Distribution Center II (Georgia) IS/MND, San Bernardino – Environmental Analyst Quetzal Gardens Project Initial Study and Categorical Exemption, San José – Environmental Analyst CEQA Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration, Confidential User, Upland – Environmental Analyst CEQA Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration, Waterman Industrial Center, San Bernardino – Environmental Analyst 241 City of Moorpark | EVOC77010.19 49 Professional Credentials • Bachelor of Science, Urban and Regional Planning, California State Polytechnic University, Pomona • LEED Green Associate #11092289 Joshua Cortez, LEED Green Associate CEQA/NEPA Staff Josh has a range of experience that includes land use planning, community development, master planning, multi-modal transportation, grading, and environmental planning. Prior to Kimley-Horn, Josh worked over three years as a jack-of-all-trades and built a wide base of career knowledge. Josh has also served Urban Land Institute within the Young Leaders Group and as a Best-of-the-Best Awards Judge for the Sustainable Communities Initiative Council. Relevant Experience Environmental Assessment, Encinitas Housing Element Update, Encinitas – Analyst Existing Conditions Report, Valdez Comprehensive Plan Update, Valdez, AK – Analyst Bicycle Transportation Plan, Palmdale Active Transportation Plan, Palmdale – Analyst Liberty, West Sacramento, CA (2017 Gold Nugget Grand Award - Best On the Boards Site Plan) – Specific Plan, Community Outreach Log, Park Needs Assessment* Back Bay Landing, Newport Beach – Planned Community Development Plan* Desert Highway Parcels, Unincorporated Riverside County – Analyst* Quail Valley, Palmdale – Planned Development Plan* 2 Osborn EIR, Irvine, CA – Project Management* CT Sycamore Center, Riverside– Analyst/Mitigated Negative Declaration* Villages at Lakeshore, Lake Elsinore – Analyst/Mitigated Negative Declaration* Legacy Orange, Orange – Analyst/Due Diligence, Site Planning* Heinz Ranch, Reno, NV – Analyst/Due Diligence, Site Planning* Madrona, Brea – Analyst/Due Diligence, Site Planning, View Analysis, Legal Options* *Prior to joining Kimley-Horn 242 City of Moorpark | EVOC77010.19 50 Professional Credentials • Bachelor of Science, Environmental Science, California Baptist University • Association of Environmental Professionals John Fyne-Nsofor CEQA/NEPA Staff John Fyne-Nsofor has experience in environmental planning, and the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). His background in environmental science enables a useful understanding of analytical reports which assists him during the creation and review of environmental documents. John has contributed to various projects for clients from both the private sector and the public sector. He has provided environmental analysis for residential, industrial, and commercial projects in Riverside County, San Bernardino County, and Orange County. Relevant Experience BNSF ONO Lead Track Extension, San Bernardino – Environmental Analyst Doheny Ocean Desalination Project, Dana Point – Environmental Analyst Skechers Warehouse Addendum EIR, Moreno Valley – Environmental Analyst Murrieta Hills Specific Plan Amendment, Murrieta - Environmental Analyst Desert Lakes Specific Plan, Coachella – Environmental Analyst New County-Wide Land Development Ordinance, Riverside County – Environmental Analyst Slover Avenue Warehouse Addendum EIR, Fontana – Environmental Analyst Monterado Planned Unit Development IS/MND, Fontana – Environmental Analyst Esri Campus Building Project IS/MND, Redlands – Environmental Analyst Professional Credentials • Bachelor, Environmental Studies, Utah State University Brad Stoneman CEQA/NEPA Staff Brad Stoneman has been responsible for environmental planning and preparation of CEQA documents including Mitigated Negative Declarations, Environmental Impact Reports, and EIR addenda. His expertise includes evaluation of specific plans, zoning, application procession, and restoration projects. His experience also includes work as a field technician, water quality technician, and fisheries technician. Relevant Experience Valley View Specific Plan Environmental Study, San Jose – Environmental Planner Mary Avenue Overcrossing EIR, Sunnyvale – Environmental Planner Tierra Robles Planned Development EIR, Shasta County – Environmental Planner Avenues Specific Plan IS/MND, Tracy – Environmental Planner 99 Houghton Industrial Park Project, Bakersfield – Environmental Planner Kern County Cannabis Land Use Ordinance Project EIR, Kern County – Environmental Planner Harbor Boulevard Road Widening Project, West Sacramento – Environmental Planner 243 City of Moorpark | EVOC77010.19 51 Professional Credentials • Master of Arts, Historic Preservation, George Washington University, Washington, D.C. • Bachelor of Arts, American History, University of Southern California, Los Angeles Shannon Davis, M.A., RPH Project Manager/Senior Architectural Historian Ms. Davis has over 20 years of experience in the field of historic preservation. She has an M.A. in Historic Preservation/American Studies from George Washington University, and a B.A. in American History from the University of Southern California. As an Architectural Historian at ASM, Ms. Davis has documented and evaluated numerous cultural resources for CEQA and NHPA compliance and completed HSRs, HRERs, HABS, and NRHP review. Ms. Davis manages ASM’s History Group and all historic preservation projects throughout California. She exceeds the Secretary of the Interior’s Professional Qualification Standards for Architectural History and History. Relevant Experience Los Angeles County Historic Preservation and Mills Act On-Call, Los Angeles County – Project Manager and Senior Architectural Historian Los Angeles County Landmark Evaluation Report: The Doumakes House, 4918 Angeles Vista Boulevard, View Park– Project Manager and Senior Architectural Historian City of LA On-Call Section 106 Historic Preservation Services Contract, Los Angeles County– Project Manager and Senior Architectural Historian HRER for James A. Foshay Learning Center, Los Angeles County – Senior Architectural Historian Ontario International Airport HCS and Survey, San Bernardino County – Project Manager/ Architectural Historian Mt. San Antonio College Cultural Resources Evaluation Report, Walnut, Los Angeles County – Project Manager and Senior Architectural Historian City of Monrovia HCS, Los Angeles County – Architectural Historian Mt. San Antonio College Cultural Resources Evaluation Report, Walnut, Los Angeles County– Project Manager and Senior Architectural Historian 244 City of Moorpark | EVOC77010.19 52 Professional Credentials • Bachelor of Science, Forest Management, Northern Arizona University • Registered Consulting Arborist (RCA) Certified Arborist #WE- 4276A Michael Huff, RCA Senior Project Manager – Fire Management Planning and Biological Resources Michael Huff is a senior project manager within Dudek’s Urban Forestry/Fire Protection Planning team with 26 years’ experience as a forester and fire protection planner. Mr. Huff specializes in management of community-wide and project-specific fire protection plans (FPPs), wildland–urban interface (WUI) fire management plans, wildfire hazard reduction projects, California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) supporting technical documents, Oak Woodland impact and mitigation plans, urban and community forest management plans, forest and tree inventories, impact analysis studies, and tree hazard evaluations. Mr. Huff possesses considerable project issue resolution experience and focuses on working within the regulations to provide creative, cost-saving solutions to his clients. He also serves as a speaker/trainer at the annual Fire Prevention Officer’s Institute. Relevant Experience Oak Tree Evaluations and Arborist’s Reports, City and County of Santa Barbara – Project Manager On-Call Arboricultural Services, City of Irvine – Project Manager Post-Wildfire Landscape Assessments, AIG Insurance, Santa Barbara, Poway, and Rancho Santa Fe – Project Manager PETCO Headquarters Wildfire Risk Assessment, PETCO, San Diego – Project Manager Oak Tree and Woodland Inventory and Evaluations, NBC Universal, Hollywood – Project Manager First Step to an Urban Forest Management Plan, City of Los Angeles – Project Manager, Lead Analyst, Lead Author On-Call Arboricultural Services, City of San Clemente – Project Manager 245 City of Moorpark | EVOC77010.19 53 Professional Credentials • Bachelor of Science, Biology/ Ecology, University of California, San Diego • Federal Permit to Conduct Fairy Shrimp Surveys, Permit No. TE022524-0 • CDFW Rare, Threatened and Endangered Plant Voucher Collection Permit, Permit No. 05006 Megan Enright Biologist Megan Enright is a senior project manager with over 18 years’ experience in environmental planning, specializing in biological resource analyses for environmental documents, regulatory compliance, and botanical surveying. Ms. Enright has served in a variety of project management and lead biologist roles for a diverse client base, including cities, counties, special districts, joint powers authorities, and land development companies. In her project work, Ms. Enright solves biological and regulatory challenges and leads interagency coordination efforts to facilitate the entitlement and environmental permitting process. Additionally, Ms. Enright conducts wetland delineations and endangered species surveys and evaluates mitigation sites. Ms. Enright serves as the botanical services manager for Dudek and is trained and skilled in botanical surveying, including vegetation mapping, rare plant surveys, and wetland delineations, and she is experienced in the identification of Southern California flora. Ms. Enright has served as extension of staff for several agencies, including water and wastewater districts and the Western Riverside County Regional Conservation Authority (RCA), a joint powers authority tasked with implementation oversight of the Western Riverside county Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP). Ms. Enright understands the benefits of allowing a municipal agency to augment its staff and the complexities of building a team environment. As a result, she is adept at meeting clients’ extension-of-staff needs. Relevant Experience Tejon Mountain Village, Tejon Mountain Village LLC, Kern County – Senior Biologist Chevron West Coyote Hills Field Closure and Development Project, Chevron USA Production Company and Chevron Pacific Coast Homes, Fullerton – Lead Botanist Campground and Trail Development Program, Mountains Recreation and Conservation Authority, Los Angeles County – Senior Biologist Rancho Santa Fe Association Project, Rancho Santa Fe Association, San Diego – Project Manager Yaqui Pass and Viking Farms, San Diego County – Lead Botanist Trabuco Canyon, The Planning Center, County of Orange – Project Manager Stebbins Property, Granada Sanitation District, City of Half Moon Bay, County of San Mateo – Biologist 246 City of Moorpark | EVOC77010.19 54 Callie Amoaku Senior Biologist/Project Manager Callie Amoaku is a biologist with over 11 years’ professional experience as an environmental analyst specializing in field surveys and report preparation. Mrs. Amoaku is committed to professional management of environmental resources, including land conservation. As a biologist with Dudek, she has coordinated large survey efforts and research and prepared biological sections for environmental impact reports (EIRs), biological technical reports (BTRs), and focused survey reports. She has also performed wildlife and plant surveys, vegetation mapping, and jurisdictional delineations throughout Southern California. Relevant Experience Ivanhoe Ranch, Pv Ivanhoe LLC, El Cajon – Project Manager Camelot, the Camelot Project Owner LLc, San Diego County – Project Assistant West Oaks Due Diligence, Carlsbad West Oaks Project Owner LLC, San Diego County – Mapping Estero Trail County of Sonoma – Biologist Silveira Property, Main County – Biologist Borrego Springs Gildred Site, the Gildred Companies, San Diego, County – Biologist Grapevine Project, Tejon Ranch, Kern County – Project Task Manager Professional Credentials • Bachelor of Science, Environmental Management and Protection/Minor in GIS. California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo • USFWS Federal 10a Survey Permit No. TE-36118B-1 • Quino Checkerspot Butterfly Surveys • Casey’s June Beetle • CDFW Plant Voucher Collecting Permit No. 2081(a)-15-108-V 247 %intilv,,, . ' le 1-.7,.1, sittitnow' iii •-, 4- •• ' i0' ' ' 4 , • .•--,-/---- L.1%', It. 1 if osdit p, , . ,...,..crt 1,„ , . ..k.-4.c_ .. iiii ....c_ .4:.:•.„. 2 ,•,.., f'• , ,. , - 4 , - \? - !iv% <-' ..,, ...,11 ''414. , - 31•-• , - ' , 4„,, ,i 1• 4 a ; 614‘!4 it, -*."5 '' ;.. . , ? • re Itt:1:07wr- .::;-. ;"--. . . ,...W.: a'' ''` 1 . , r-'11::'fi '=-:.7-'-''' ,.,. , rulf‘'__ - ' .... .-,------- ---. `‘.4,\. , - ----z:.•'.01.• •• ..t fr • . . , i_.„..,17.1 • t c, * *- . , '; .•. , •' '", '.... --- ----- .. , a ss,..._ 1:4 ..)* -' It : II : ....,.,;,- ..„.. .‘„,;-,, , . , :?..i., , -i- ki 1,:iiikiy . - . _,, _4 ,'- ... t 4. 111%, if ''• ''' - .. 1 ' Or .... 1"---- --.--':7:7V - .0. -ZW;.1.:- .v Vit '-• (' i ._ . 1 'V.. * . ' ' •r. ,4!;. ti,A..... ;-- ' ,,,,...- ... .1:4Fitt ' A.,. . 4,, .,,, . lit.' • - t ...---# , , ,. -... - - ,_ .... •t _ .... ..--- _ ...„ . ...%, , - , .. ..g. -----, , ..... , ., ,. . . . , . . ... - , - -1- i ta„i•-• • , •.„:... '44--...... ,..‘, 1 .01-1 y iet....ns 4, AI. itIFFilt -- (. ....c • . .\ jr - . s ..et . • . <4.. s, ,--...._ • ,---1-4- i , • ' ' •, * : 'fr r tilt ' Ve, ' .. ii Cl''.1:4*"* C, ,: : "., . t . .. AIV al ‘ * ' 41. 1 47*- i' -.*.)' '* le.' ' ' - - ' -- ....... -911' 1:-114.j ' .• .,‘.... *,,k.-to . • ,-; 4.0,- -0 it*A.. ...1 , .• VI-' 'Tr e 'Y 7 ‘‘-- - 4- - , t r- : ' ,c , ,.. ., . .. „\. t A osie4;k7e5o ..... L... ,,, , 4, ..,..,0--... .„,,,,„ 1-• -4,,- . I ., ,, _.. , ,..1. . ir * ', '•,' _. S liPt:.‘ , -: 'I : .''. .-. -las- --.. .. .:_-' / .- '42 .A. , i °AL_ 1 ' • 4.i. _ . -444. i ye t 4c1, ,, ,, .-.- Th.eAfAlielMa("1"". P '•-'-t.' kf „, ' t "-w,,..: Ae 1-46,3110,.4,04 C r* 1 0. 14v ' i I . .liti,g jrW ---.1 /11: Iller-74."'Irr' ,,,r..,.:__.• ,, , . „ ;,,, is. c 14... ree -, 1 t.,, yy4-4 4:4',I....26 ;(4.4.- ,i.... ..t 1_0 f. I. -_El, ,-0 '_4,11:10'1' • Ay -1 - - it:. - ; -IA; v`,111-1,"_* 44-6. ,••• •7 rlil-:ri,.L.-_,) .G4-, `-' , 4.7.11. J-"" - :;••*-44- ------. '-*B ''- '- - 'f .-`' Att46.* he' .............. k • 4 , , . .. te ' \ .iic,‘ -1r - ' 0 - , , , : ‘,. ,.. , • of •0•;' ..os '.:.,' • ,4# 1.4*. It ),. .',.'1. 1It 7, • ... ***f,,,,,,,,•. ._ 4 . 71r, avail,/ ...,.. .1,1 _____.0x4rip ,i.e..As i • .11 tletpti_, 4 ' ..et•.,, • ....-ii. ' ...• ., * e,.:.,,,-;,..,, :. :'1„ „ , t!-.1 'i.. 1,4.11 4 - NO _... .J,#.7,..,":,*,-. 4 .., .,.. • • ‘ , 4&''''1,,,,...._________s__. .- A /A gidit V4'••'.1. ' ''TIOr ,.4,CUED& '..11,1rarg"71111111,7 1,1 1.; 16_ ' _ i $ _____ ......- -- ... ....-...joilimallideln•-• z - ...7.44,..„ _-; - --'- b.,..e •F*4 11 012240 .r ' I'"--- -- ._ ,' ..,.:•,...,.... *._ _ A ,,, --7•&,,,..4., . ,i -,„:-_,_ ..- _ ,,,,,-.7- -' 1*,- "...' ',... .1, . -7.--4-1,1c.--;-401:4;or ,'... •. 141ts* 4101 ,, "._ • 4;- .•4..z. •...... -----.....„: .•... ..,It. • , ,., ‘,.. .I1r. I, IS i',7 414‘ \--- . •,...„ A4:4 ..s, •.." . „... _ ',• 4 -.. " •.6... ' le At ‘ — , .0.'•s - .... ,,.. • • . liik •.. ' AC'' -7-"••- _ 4 (4 elk 4• CONTACT '- ,te'r _sp. •,::. . .-., -- 416 , .,,, Dana Privitt, AICP • ;,. ,-,..,.:4, , %,. .,.., 4 714.786.6128 dana.privitt@kimley-horn.com Kimley*Horn 765 The City Drive Suite 200 Orange, CA 92868 www.Kimley-Horn.com The entirety of this proposal, including text and images, is the property of Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.,protected under U.S.copyright law,.A a Copyright©2019 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc u ATTACHMENT 2 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF MOORPARK AND CHAMBERS GROUP, INC. FOR ON-CALL ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTING SERVICES THIS AGREEMENT, made and effective as of this _____ day of ____________, 2019, between the City of Moorpark, a municipal corporation (“City”) and Chambers Group, Inc., an S corporation (“Consultant”). In consideration of the mutual covenants and conditions set forth herein, the parties agree as follows: WHEREAS, City has the need for on-call environmental consulting services; and WHEREAS, Consultant specializes in providing such services and has the proper work experience, certifications, and background to carry out the duties involved; and WHEREAS, Consultant has submitted to City a Proposal dated May 24, 2019, which is attached hereto as Exhibit C. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants, benefits, and premises herein stated, the parties hereto agree as follows: 1. TERM The term of this Agreement shall be from the date of execution through June 30, 2021, unless this Agreement is terminated or suspended pursuant to this Agreement. 2. SCOPE OF SERVICES City does hereby retain Consultant, as an independent contractor, in a contractual capacity to provide on-call environmental consulting services, as set forth in Exhibit C. In the event there is a conflict between the provisions of Exhibit C and this Agreement, the language contained in this Agreement shall take precedence. Consultant shall perform the tasks described and set forth in Exhibit C. Consultant shall complete the tasks according to the schedule of performance which is also set forth in Exhibit C. Compensation for the services to be performed by Consultant shall be in accordance with Exhibit C. Compensation shall not exceed the rates or total contract value of one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000.00) as stated in Exhibit C, without a written Amendment to the Agreement executed by both parties. Payment by City to Consultant shall be in accordance with the provisions of this Agreement. 249 3. PERFORMANCE Consultant shall at all times faithfully, competently and to the best of their ability, experience, standard of care, and talent, perform all tasks described herein. Consultant shall employ, at a minimum, generally accepted standards and practices utilized by persons engaged in providing similar services as are required of Consultant hereunder in meeting its obligations under this Agreement. 4. MANAGEMENT The individual directly responsible for Consultant’s overall performance of the Agreement provisions herein above set forth and to serve as principal liaison between City and Consultant shall be Meghan Gibson, and no other individual may be substituted without the prior written approval of the City Manager. The City’s contact person in charge of administration of this Agreement, and to serve as principal liaison between Consultant and City, shall be the City Manager or the City Manager’s designee. 5. PAYMENT Taxpayer ID number(s) must be provided by Consultant on an IRS W -9 form before payments may be made by City to Consultant. The City agrees to pay Consultant monthly, in accordance with the payment rates and terms and the schedule of payment as set forth in Exhibit C, based upon actual time spent on the above tasks. This amount shall not exceed one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000.00) for the total term of the Agreement unless additional payment is approved as provided in this Agreement. Consultant shall not be compensated for any services rendered in connection with its performance of this Agreement, which are in addition to those set forth herein, unless such additional services and compensation are authorized, in advance, in a written amendment to this Agreement executed by both parties. The City Manager, if authorized by City Council, may approve additional work not to exceed ten percent (10%) of the amount of the Agreement. Consultant shall submit invoices monthly for actual services performed. Invoices shall be submitted on or about the first business day of each month, or as soon thereafter as practical, for services provided in the previous month. Payment shall be made within thirty (30) days of receipt of each invoice as to all non-disputed fees. Any expense or reimbursable cost appearing on any invoice shall be accompanied by a receipt or other documentation subject to approval of the City Manager or the City Manager’s designee. If the City disputes any of Consultant’s fees or expenses, City shall give written notice to Consultant within thirty (30) days of receipt of any disputed fees set forth on the invoice. 250 6. TERMINATION OR SUSPENSION WITHOUT CAUSE The City may at any time, for any reason, with or without cause, suspend, or terminate this Agreement, or any portion hereof, by serving upon the Consultant at least ten (10) days prior written notice. Upon receipt of said notice, the Consultant shall immediately cease all work under this Agreement, unless the notice provides otherwise. If the City suspends or terminates a portion of this Agreement, such suspension or termination shall not make void or invalidate the remainder of this Agreement. The Consultant may terminate this Agreement only by providing City with written notice no less than thirty (30) days in advance of such termination. In the event this Agreement is terminated or suspended pursuant to this Section, the City shall pay to Consultant the actual value of the work performed up to the time of termination or suspension, provided that the work performed is of value to the City. Upon termination or suspension of the Agreement pursuant to this Section, the Consultant will submit an invoice to the City pursuant to this Agreement. 7. DEFAULT OF CONSULTANT The Consultant’s failure to comply with the provisions of this Agreement shall constitute a default. In the event that Consultant is in default for cause under the terms of this Agreement, City shall have no obligation or duty to continue compensating Consultant for any work performed after the date of default and can terminate or suspend this Agreement immediately by written notice to the Consultant. If such failure by the Consultant to make progress in the performance of work hereunder arises out of causes beyond the Consultant’s control, and without fault or negligence of the Consultant, it shall not be considered a default. If the City Manager or his/her designee determines that the Consultant is in default in the performance of any of the terms or conditions of this Agreement, he/she shall cause to be served upon the Consultant a written notice of the default. The Consultant shall have ten (10) days after service upon it of said notice in which to cure the default by rendering a satisfactory performance. In the event that the Consultant fails to cure its default within such period of time, the City shall have the right, notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, to terminate this Agreement without further notice and without prejudice to any other remedy to which it may be entitled at law, in equity or under this Agreement. 8. LIQUIDATED DAMAGES [This section intentionally left blank.] 9. OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTS Consultant shall maintain complete and accurate records with respect to sales, costs, expenses, receipts, and other such information required by City that relate to the performance of services under this Agreement. Consultant shall maintain adequate 251 records of services provided in sufficient detail to permit an evaluation of services. All such records shall be maintained in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and shall be clearly identified and readily accessible. Consultant shall provide free access to the representatives of City or the City’s designees at reasonable times to such books and records; shall give the City the right to examine and audit said books and records; shall permit City to make transcripts therefrom as necessary; and shall allow inspection of all work, data, documents, proceedings, and activities related to this Agreement. Notification of audit shall be provided at least thirty (30) days before any such audit is conducted. Such records, together with supporting documents, shall be maintained for a period of five (5) years after receipt of final payment. Upon completion of, or in the event of termination or suspension without cause of this Agreement, all original documents, designs, drawings, maps, models, computer files, surveys, notes, and other documents prepared in the course of providing the services to be performed pursuant to this Agreement shall become the sole property of the City and may be used, reused, or otherwise disposed of by the City without the permission of the Consultant. With respect to computer files, Consultant shall make available to the City, at the Consultant’s office and upon reasonable written request by the City, the necessary computer software and hardware for purposes of accessing, compiling, transferring, and printing computer files. 10. INDEMNIFICATION AND HOLD HARMLESS Indemnity for professional liability: When the law establishes a professional standard of care for Consultant’s Services, to the fullest extent permitted by law, Consultant shall indemnify, protect, defend and hold harmless City and any and all of its officials, employees, and agents (“Indemnified Parties”) from and against any and all losses, liabilities, damages, costs and expenses, including legal counsels’ fees and costs to the extent same are caused in whole or in part by any negligent or wrongful act, error or omission of Consultant, its officers, agents, employees or subconsultants (or any agency or individual that Consultant shall bear the legal liability thereof) in the performance of professional services under this Agreement. Indemnity for other than professional liability: Other than in the performance of professional services and to the full extent permitted by law, Consultant shall indemnify, protect, defend and hold harmless City, and any and all of its officials, employees, and agents from and against any liability (including liability for claims, suits, actions, arbitration proceedings, administrative proceedings, regulatory proceedings, losses, expenses or costs of any kind, whether actual, alleged or threatened, including legal counsels’ fees and costs, court costs, interest, defense costs, and expert witness fees), where the same arise out of, are a consequence of, or are in any way attributable to, in whole or in part, the performance of this Agreement by Consultant or by any individual or agency for which Consultant is legally liable, including but not limited to officers, agents, employees or subconsultants of Consultant. Consultant agrees to obtain executed indemnity agreements with provisions identical to those set forth here in this Section from each and every subconsultant, or any other person or entity involved by, for, with, or on behalf of Consultant in the 252 performance of this Agreement. In the event Consultant fails to obtain such indemnity obligations from others as required here, Consultant agrees to be fully responsible according to the terms of this Section. Failure of City to monitor compliance with these requirements imposes no additional obligations on City and will in no way act as a waiver of any rights hereunder. This obligation to indemnify and defend City as set forth here is binding on the successors, assigns, or heirs of Consultant and shall survive the termination of this Agreement or this Section. City does not and shall not waive any rights that it may have against Consultant by reason of this Section, because of the acceptance by City, or the deposit with City, of any insurance policy or certificate required pursuant to this Agreement. The hold harmless and indemnification provisions shall apply regardless of whether or not said insurance policies are determined to be applicable to any losses, liabilities, damages, costs, and expenses described in this Section. 11. INSURANCE Consultant shall maintain prior to the beginning of and for the duration of this Agreement insurance coverage as specified in Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference as though set forth in full. 12. INDEPENDENT CONSULTANT Consultant is and shall at all times remain as to the City a wholly independent Contractor. The personnel performing the services under this Agreement on behalf of Consultant shall at all times be under Consultant’s exclusive direction and control. Neither City nor any of its officers, employees, or agents shall have control over the conduct of Consultant or any of Consultant’s officers, employees, or agents, except as set forth in this Agreement. Consultant shall not at any time or in any manner represent that it or any of its officers, employees, or agents are in any manner officers or employees, or agents of the City except as set forth in this Agreement. Consultant shall not incur or have the power to incur any debt, obligation, or liability against City, or bind City in any manner. No employee benefits shall be available to Consultant in connection with the performance of this Agreement. Except for the fees paid to Consultant as provided in the Agreement, City shall not pay salaries, wages, or other compensation to Consultant for performing services hereunder for City. City shall not be liable for compensation or indemnification to Consultant for injury or sickness arising out of performing services hereunder. 13. LEGAL RESPONSIBILITIES The Consultant shall keep itself informed of local, state, and federal laws and regulations which in any manner affect those employed by it or in any way affect the performance of its service pursuant to this Agreement. The Consultant shall at all times observe and comply with all such laws and regulations, including but not limited to the Americans with Disabilities Act and Occupational Safety and Health Administration laws 253 and regulations. The Consultant shall comply with and sign Exhibit B, the Scope of Work Requirement for Professional Services Agreements Compliance with California Government Code Section 7550, when applicable. The City, and its officers and employees, shall not be liable at law or in equity occasioned by failure of the Consultant to comply with this Section. 14. ANTI DISCRIMINATION Neither the Consultant, nor any subconsultant under the Consultant, shall discriminate in employment of persons upon the work because of race, religious creed, color, national origin, ancestry, physical disability, mental disability, medical condition, genetic information, marital status, sex, gender, gender identity, gender expression, age, sexual orientation, or military and veteran status; or any other basis protected by applicable federal, state, or local law, except as provided in Section 12940 of the Government Code. Consultant shall have responsibility for compliance with this Section. 15. UNDUE INFLUENCE Consultant declares and warrants that no undue influence or pressure is used against or in concert with any officer or employee of the City in connection with the award, terms, or implementation of this Agreement, including any method of coercion, confidential financial arrangement, or financial inducement. No officer or employee of the City will receive compensation, directly or indirectly from Consultant, or any officer, employee, or agent of Consultant, in connection with the award of this Agreement or any work to be conducted as a result of this Agreement. Violation of this Section shall be a material breach of this Agreement entitling the City to any and all remedies at law or in equity. 16. NO BENEFIT TO ARISE TO LOCAL EMPLOYEES No member, officer, or employee of the City, or their designees or agents, and no public official who exercises authority over or responsibilities with respect to the Services during his/her tenure or for one year thereafter, shall have any interest, direct or indirect, in any agreement or sub-agreement, or the proceeds thereof, for work to be performed in connection with the Services performed under this Agreement. 17. CONFLICT OF INTEREST The Contractor covenants that if they or any officer or principal of their firm have any interests, or if they acquire any interest, directly or indirectly, which will conflict in any manner or degree with the performance of their services hereunder, Contractor shall immediately notify the City, in writing, informing the City of the nature of the contract, prior to commencing with any work or entering into such contract. If the City determines a potential conflict of interest, the City may assign any work related to the conflict of interest to an alternate contractor. 254 18. NOTICE Any notice to be given pursuant to this Agreement shall be in writing, and all such notices and any other document to be delivered shall be delivered by personal service or by deposit in the United States mail, certified or registered, return receipt requested, with postage prepaid, and addressed to the party for whom intended as follows: To: City Manager City of Moorpark 799 Moorpark Ave. Moorpark, CA 93021 To: Meghan Gibson Chambers Group, Inc. 600 West Broadway, Suite 250 Glendale, CA 91204 Either party may, from time to time, by written notice to the other, designate a different address or contact person, which shall be substituted for the one above specified. Notices, payments and other documents shall be deemed delivered upon receipt by personal service or as of the third (3rd) day after deposit in the United States mail. 19. CHANGE IN NAME Should a change be contemplated in the name or nature of the Consultant's legal entity, the Consultant shall first notify the City in order that proper steps may be taken to have the change reflected in the Agreement documents. 20. ASSIGNMENT Consultant shall not assign this Agreement or any of the rights, duties, or obligations hereunder. It is understood and acknowledged by the parties that Consultant is uniquely qualified to perform the services provided for in this Agreement. 21. LICENSES At all times during the term of this Agreement, Consultant shall have in full force and effect, all licenses required of it by law for the performance of the services in this Agreement. 22. VENUE AND GOVERNING LAW This Agreement is made, entered into, and executed in Ventura County, California, and any action filed in any court or for arbitration for the interpretation, enforcement or other action of the terms, conditions, or covenants referred to herein shall be filed in the applicable court in Ventura County, California. The City and Consultant understand and agree that the laws of the state of California shall govern the 255 rights, obligations, duties, and liabilities of the parties to this Agreement and also govern the interpretation of this Agreement. 23. COST RECOVERY In the event any action, suit or proceeding is brought for the enforcement of, or the declaration of any right or obligation pursuant to this Agreement or as a result of any alleged breach of any provision of this Agreement, the prevailing party shall be entitled to recover its costs and expenses, including attorneys’ fees, from the losing party, and any judgment or decree rendered in such a proceeding shall include an award thereof. 24. ARBITRATION Cases involving a dispute between City and Consultant may be decided by an arbitrator if both sides agree in writing, with costs proportional to the judgment of the arbitrator. 25. ENTIRE AGREEMENT This Agreement and the Exhibits attached hereto contain the entire understanding between the parties relating to the obligations of the parties described in this Agreement. All prior or contemporaneous agreements, understandings, representations, and statements, oral or written, are merged into this Agreement and shall be of no further force or effect. Each party is entering into this Agreement based solely upon the representations set forth herein and upon each party’s own independent investigation of any and all facts such party deems material. 26. CAPTIONS OR HEADINGS The captions and headings of the various Articles, Paragraphs, and Exhibits of this Agreement are for convenience and identification only and shall not be deemed to limit or define the content of the respective Articles, Paragraphs, and Exhibits hereof. 27. AMENDMENTS Any amendment, modification, or variation from the terms of this Agreement shall be in writing and shall be effective only upon approval by both parties to this Agreement. 28. PRECEDENCE In the event of conflict, the requirements of the City’s Request for Proposal, if any, and this Agreement shall take precedence over those contained in the Consultant’s Proposal. 29. INTERPRETATION OF AGREEMENT Should interpretation of this Agreement, or any portion thereof, be necessary, it is deemed that this Agreement was prepared by the parties jointly and equally, and shall 256 not be interpreted against either party on the ground that the party prepared the Agreement or caused it to be prepared. 30. WAIVER No waiver of any provision of this Agreement shall be deemed, or shall constitute, a waiver of any other provision, whether or not similar, nor shall any such waiver constitute a continuing or subsequent waiver of the same provision. No waiver shall be binding unless executed in writing by the party making the waiver. 31. AUTHORITY TO EXECUTE The person or persons executing this Agreement on behalf of the Consultant warrants and represents that he/she has the authority to execute this Agreement on behalf of the Consultant and has the authority to bind Consultant to the performance of obligations hereunder. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed the day and year first above written. CITY OF MOORPARK CHAMBERS GROUP, INC. __________________________________ __________________________________ Troy Brown, City Manager Mike McEntee, COO Attest: __________________________________ Ky Spangler, City Clerk 257 Exhibit A INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS Prior to the beginning of and throughout the duration of Work, Consultant will maintain insurance in conformance with the requirements set forth below. Consultant will use existing coverage to comply with these requirements. If that existing coverage does not meet requirements set forth here, Consultant agrees to amend, supplement, or endorse the existing coverage to do so. Consultant acknowledges that the insurance coverage and policy limits set forth in this section constitute the minimum amount of coverage required. Any insurance proceeds available to the City in excess of the limits and coverage required in this Agreement and which is applicable to a given loss, will be available to the City. Consultant shall provide the following types and amounts of insurance: Commercial General Liability Insurance using Insurance Services Office (ISO) “Commercial General Liability” policy form CG 00 01 or the exact equivalent. Defense costs must be paid in addition to limits. There shall be no cross liability exclusion for claims or suits by one insured against another. Limits are subject to review but in no event less than $1,000,000 per occurrence for all covered losses and no less than $2,000,000 general aggregate. Business Auto Coverage on ISO Business Auto Coverage form CA 00 01 including symbol 1 (Any Auto) or the exact equivalent. Limits are subject to review, but in no event to be less than $1,000,000 per accident. If Consultant owns no vehicles, this requirement may be satisfied by a non-owned auto endorsement to the general liability policy described above. If Consultant or Consultant’s employees will use personal autos in any way on this project, Consultant shall provide evidence of personal auto liability for each such person. Workers’ Compensation on a state-approved policy form providing statutory benefits as required by law with employer’s liability limits no less than $1,000,000 per accident or disease. Professional Liability or Errors and Omissions Insurance as appropriate shall be written on a policy form coverage specifically designed to protect against acts, errors or omissions of the Consultant and “Covered Professional Services” as designated in the policy must specifically include work performed under this Agreement. The policy limit shall be no less than $1,000,000 per claim and in the aggregate. The policy must “pay on behalf of” the insured and must include a provision establishing the insurer’s duty to defend. The policy retroactive date shall be on or before the effective date of this Agreement. Excess or Umbrella Liability Insurance (Over Primary) if used to meet limit requirements, shall provide coverage at least as broad as specified for the underlying coverages. Coverage shall be provided on a “pay on behalf” basis, with defense costs 258 payable in addition to policy limits. Policy shall contain a provision obligating insurer at the time insured’s liability is determined, not requiring actual payment by the insured first. There shall be no cross liability exclusion precluding coverage for claims or suits by one insured against another. Coverage shall be applicable to the City for injury to employees of Consultant, subconsultants, or others involved in the Work. The scope of coverage provided is subject to approval by the City following receipt of proof of insurance as required herein. Limits are subject to review but in no event less than $1,000,000 aggregate. Insurance procured pursuant to these requirements shall be written by insurers that are admitted carriers in the State of California and with an A.M. Bests rating of A- or better and a minimum financial size of VII. General conditions pertaining to provision of insurance coverage by Consultant. Consultant and the City agree to the following with respect to insurance provided by Consultant: 1. Consultant agrees to have its insurer endorse the third party general liability coverage required herein to include as additional insureds the City, its officials, employees, and agents, using standard ISO endorsement CG 2010 and CG 2037 with edition acceptable to the City. Consultant also agrees to require all contractors and subcontractors to do likewise. 2. No liability insurance coverage provided to comply with this Agreement shall prohibit Consultant, or Consultant’s employees, or agents, from waiving the right to subrogation prior to a loss. Consultant agrees to waive subrogation rights against the City regardless of the applicability of any insurance proceeds, and to require all contractors and subconsultants to do likewise. 3. All insurance coverage and limits provided by Contractor and available or applicable to this Agreement are intended to apply to the full extent of the policies. Nothing contained in this Agreement or any other agreement relating to the City or its operation limits the application of such insurance coverage. 4. None of the coverages required herein will be in compliance with these requirements if they include limiting endorsement of any kind that has not been first submitted to the City and approved in writing. 5. No liability policy shall contain any provision or definition that would serve to eliminate so-called “third party action over” claims, including any exclusion for bodily injury to an employee of the insured or of any contractor or subconsultant. 6. All coverage types and limits required are subject to approval, modification, and additional requirements by the City, as the need arises. Consultant shall not make any reductions in scope of coverage (e.g. elimination of contractual liability or reduction of discovery period) that may affect the City’s protection without the City’s prior written consent. 259 7. Proof of compliance with these insurance requirements, consisting of certificates of insurance evidencing all of the coverages required and an additional insured endorsement to Consultant’s general liability policy, shall be delivered to city at or prior to the execution of this Agreement. In the event such proof of any insurance is not delivered as required, or in the event such insurance is canceled or reduced at any time and no replacement coverage is provided, the City has the right, but not the duty, to obtain any insurance it deems necessary to protect its interests under this or any other Agreement and to pay the premium. Any premium so paid by the City shall be charged to and promptly paid by Consultant or deducted from sums due Consultant, at the City’s option. 8. Certificate(s) are to reflect that the insurer will provide thirty (30) days notice to the City of any cancellation or reduction of coverage. Consultant agrees to require its insurer to modify such certificates to delete any exculpatory wording stating that failure of the insurer to mail written notice of cancellation or reduction of coverage imposes no obligation, or that any party will “endeavor” (as opposed to being required) to comply with the requirements of the certificate. 9. It is acknowledged by the parties of this Agreement that all insurance coverage required to be provided by Consultant or any subconsultant, is intended to apply first and on a primary, non-contributing basis in relation to any other insurance or self-insurance available to the City. 10. Consultant agrees to ensure that subconsultants, and any other party involved with the Work who is brought onto or involved in the Work by Consultant, provide the same minimum insurance required of Consultant. Consultant agrees to monitor and review all such coverage and assumes all responsibility for ensuring that such coverage is provided in conformity with the requirements of this section. Consultant agrees that upon request, all agreements with subconsultants and others engaged in the Work will be submitted to the City for review. 11. Consultant agrees not to self-insure or to use any self-insured retentions or deductibles on any portion of the insurance required herein and further agrees that it will not allow any contractor, subconsultant, Architect, Engineer, or other entity or person in any way involved in the performance of Work contemplated by this Agreement to self-insure its obligations to the City. If Consultant’s existing coverage includes a deductible or self-insured retention, the deductible or self- insured retention must be declared to the City. At that time, the City shall review options with the Consultant, which may include reduction or elimination of the deductible or self-insured retention, substitution of other coverage, or other solutions. 12. The City reserves the right at any time during the term of the Agreement to change the amounts and types of insurance required by giving the Consultant ninety (90) days advance written notice of such change. If such change results in substantial additional cost to the Consultant, the City will negotiate additional compensation proportional to the increased benefit to the City. 260 13. For purposes of applying insurance coverage only, this Agreement will be deemed to have been executed immediately upon any party hereto taking any steps that can be deemed to be in furtherance of or towards performance of this Agreement. 14. Consultant acknowledges and agrees that any actual or alleged failure on the part of the City to inform Consultant of non-compliance with an insurance requirement in no way imposes any additional obligations to the City nor does it waive any rights hereunder in this or any other regard. 15. Consultant will renew the required coverage annually as long as the City, or its employees or agents face an exposure from operations of any type pursuant to this Agreement. This obligation applies whether or not the Agreement is canceled or terminated for any reason. Termination of this obligation is not effective until the City executes a written statement to that effect. 16. Consultant shall provide proof that policies of insurance required herein expiring during the term of this Agreement have been renewed or replaced with other policies providing at least the same coverage. Proof that such coverage has been ordered shall be submitted prior to expiration. A coverage binder or letter from Consultant’s insurance agent to this effect is acceptable. A certificate of insurance and/or additional insured endorsement as required in these specifications applicable to the renewing or new coverage must be provided to the City within five days of the expiration of coverage. 17. The provisions of any Workers’ Compensation or similar act will not limit the obligations of Consultant under this Agreement. Consultant expressly agrees not to use any statutory immunity defenses under such laws with respect to the City, its employees, officials and agents. 18. Requirements of specific coverage features or limits contained in this section are not intended as limitations on coverage, limits, or other requirements nor as a waiver of any coverage normally provided by any given policy. Specific reference to a given coverage feature is for purposes of clarification only as it pertains to a given issue, and is not intended by any party or insured to be limiting or all- inclusive. 19. These insurance requirements are intended to be separate and distinct from any other provision in this Agreement and are intended by the parties here to be interpreted as such. 20. The requirements in this section supersede all other sections and provisions of this Agreement to the extent that any other section or provision conflicts or impairs the provisions of this section. 21. Consultant agrees to be responsible for ensuring that no contract used by any party involved in any way with the Work reserves the right to charge the City or 261 Consultant for the cost of additional insurance coverage required by this Agreement. Any such provisions are to be deleted with reference to the City. It is not the intent of the City to reimburse any third party for the cost of complying with these requirements. There shall be no recourse against the City for payment of premiums or other amounts with respect thereto. 22. Consultant agrees to provide immediate notice to City of any claim or loss against Consultant arising out of the work performed under this Agreement. The City assumes no obligation or liability by such notice, but has the right (but not the duty) to monitor the handling of any such claim or claims if they are likely to involve the City. 262 Exhibit B CITY OF MOORPARK Scope of Work Requirement for Professional Services Agreements Compliance with California Government Code Section 7550 Consultant shall sign and include this page in any document or written reports prepared by Consultant for the City of Moorpark (City) to which California Government Code Section 7550 (Government Code § 7550) applies. Government Code §7550 reads: “(a) Any document or written report prepared for or under the direction of a state or local agency, that is prepared in whole or in part by nonemployees of the agency, shall contain the numbers and dollar amounts of all contracts and subcontracts relating to the preparation of the document or written report; if the total cost for the work performed by nonemployees of the agency exceeds five thousand dollars ($5,000). The contract and subcontract numbers and dollar amounts shall be contained in a separate section of the document or written report. (b) When multiple documents or written reports are the subject or product of the contract, the disclosure section may also contain a statement indicating that the total contract amount represents compensation for multiple documents or written reports.” For all Professional Services Agreement with a total dollar value in excess of $5,000, a signed and completed copy of this form must be attached to all documents or completed reports submitted to the City pursuant to the Scope of Work. Does the dollar value of this Professional Services Agreement exceed $5,000? Yes No If yes, then the following information must be provided in compliance with Government Code § 7550: 1. Dollar amount of Agreement/Contract: $ 100,000.00 2. Dollar amount of Subcontract: $ 3. Does the total contract amount represent compensation for multiple documents or written reports? Yes No I have read the foregoing Code section and will comply with Government Code §7550. Chambers Group, Inc. Mike McEntee, COO Date 263 EXHIBIT C CHAMBERS GROUP AN EMPLOYEE - ON - CALL ENVIRONMENTAL OWNED COMPANY ESOP CONSULTING SERVICES CGI CITY OF MOORPARK CA DGS CERTIFIED SBE CGI CPUC CERTIFIED WMBE CGI vo � III _ I,Illll,ill_ jos. ® . 0. 441 MAY 24, 2019 264 Request For Qualifications For On‐Call Environmental Consulting Services City of Moorpark 1 63202 Table of Contents Page Introduction .................................................................................................................................................................................. 2 Statement of Qualifications ....................................................................................................................................................... 3 References ................................................................................................................................................................................... 19 Cost Proposal ............................................................................................................................................................................. 20 Additional Information ............................................................................................................................................................. 23 Signature ...................................................................................................................................................................................... 26 Appendix A – Resumes 265 Request For Qualifications For On‐Call Environmental Consulting Services City of Moorpark 2 63202 Introduction Incorporated in 1983, the City of Moorpark (City) is a suburban city located in southeastern Ventura County. The City has a population of approximately 37,000 residents and covers approximately 12.5 square miles. While the majority of the City has been built out, additional development is expected on the periphery of the City, along with numerous infill developments in the coming years. Chambers Group understands that the City is requesting qualifications for on‐call environmental consulting services. The City is seeking to establish an agreement for on‐call environmental services in connection with mid‐to‐large sized development projects and/or policy initiatives. Further, Chambers Group understands that the City's Community Development Department may require additional professional and technical expertise in the preparation and review of environmental analysis. As a comprehensive environmental planning company with 40 years of experience, Chambers Group (SBE) offers a full complement of dedicated staff members who have successfully executed hundreds of environmental reports and studies in full compliance with CEQA and NEPA. Additionally, our team boasts an abundance of experience preparing the full range of technical studies and applicable environmental compliance permitting. Proven Track Record of Innovative Solutions Working Under On‐Call Contracts: Chambers Group has developed a systematic approach to project management of on‐call contracts. In the last 10 years alone, Chambers Group has held over 75 on‐call contracts, which County of Orange, Los Angeles County Department of Public Works, Los Angeles County Sanitation District, County of Los Angeles, City of Beaumont, City of Carlsbad, Port of San Diego, and SDG&E, to name a few. Right‐Size: Our firm is large enough that we can provide full service environmental planning capacity to the City; however, we are not so large that task orders for City would be just another line item in a spreadsheet. The City of Moorpark is a priority for our entire firm, and we will provide quality products at competitive prices, all from our local office. Highly Accomplished In‐house Technical Staff: Chambers Group has many internal resources to move critical studies along, including biological resources, cultural resources, environmental planning and permitting, and Geographic Information Systems (GIS), saving the City time and money. Past Success with Applicable Regulatory Agencies: Our wide‐range of experience has led to solid relationships and successful projects permitted through regulatory agencies such as California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW), United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS), Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB), United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), and Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), to name a few. Up to Date on the Most Current Regulations: The regulatory environment in California is ever evolving and our in‐house staff of planners and technical expert are equipped with the most up to date regulatory guidance. Our planners all currently serve on their respective Chapter of the Association of Environmental Professionals Board which allows our planning team to stay abreast of the rapidly changing regulatory environment. Whether implementing the new guidance following the Friant Ranch decision; or implementing the State Water Resources Control Board definition of what constitutes a wetland; or implementing the impending revisions to the Waters of the U.S. definition, our team will have you covered. 266 Request For Qualifications For On‐Call Environmental Consulting Services City of Moorpark 3 63202 Statement of Qualifications Incorporated 40 years ago in 1979, Chambers Group has developed a foundation of knowledge and expertise in applying the principles of CEQA, NEPA, and the wide spectrum of environmental regulations, including but not limited to the Clean Water Act, Endangered Species Act, Migratory Bird Treaty Act, National Historic Preservation Act, Archaeological Resource Protection Act, and the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act. Our experience applying these principles enable us to interpret and advise clients on complex federal, State, and local environmental regulations and legislation. In the last ten years, we have held over 75 on‐call contracts with public agencies. Drawing from this experience and the firm’s proven and streamlined on‐call project management process, Chambers Group is prepared to provide the City with on‐call environmental consulting services. Chambers Group is a full‐service environmental consulting firm. Our CEQA and NEPA practitioners are backed by a team of archaeologists, biologists, permitting experts, and site restoration and monitoring professionals at the top of their respective fields. Additionally, for this contract, Chambers Group will be supported by Vista Environmental for air quality, greenhouse gas, and noise; LLG for traffic/transportation; and Haley and Aldrich for hydrology, geology and soils, and hazards. We will also work with the City’s preferred subconsultants if desired. Our team of 55 professionals is large enough to have the capacity to manage multiple concurrent projects for the City while not being so large as to not provide attentive, responsive service. The City of Moorpark is a priority for our firm, and the entirety of our staff is committed to being a one‐stop‐shop for all of the City’s environmental consulting needs. Moorpark is not another line item on our balance sheet; it is a jurisdiction that we have pr ioritized as an excellent fit due to our belief in the direction by which City Staff is leading the community and the size and resources of our firm. Drawing from our experience managing on‐call in the last 10 years, we are confident in our ability to apply our streamlined on‐call project management process along with our quality client service and collaborative team‐work approach to provide the City with the highest standard of environmental documents. Chambers Group has sufficient personnel and resources to provide timely on‐call services for the next two years. 267 Request For Qualifications For On‐Call Environmental Consulting Services City of Moorpark 4 63202 Project Team Organization Chart CEQA and Environmental Compliance Support Services The following section describe our understanding of the services to be performed under this contract. Notification and consultation with Native American Tribes in compliance AB 52 and Senate Bill 18 (SB 18) Chambers Group has considerable experience in cultural and paleontological resources management related to archaeology (both historic and prehistoric), built environments, ethnography, and fossil remains for public and private sector clients including areas within Riverside County. Chambers Group can lead the consultation efforts or provide general support during the outreach process. Given that tribes in the region may overlap for various projects, we can coordinate meetings directly with the tribes to discuss project specific concerns and mitigation measures. 268 Request For Qualifications For On‐Call Environmental Consulting Services City of Moorpark 5 63202 On-Call Services and Meetings In addition to peer reviewing documentation, our services include close interactions with City to streamline City review and applications, attending project meetings, and attending presentations at Planning Commission and/or City Council meetings. Chambers Group will provide the City with on‐call advisory services for applicability of CEQA review and recommendations for appropriate CEQA compliance. We understand the importance of face‐to‐face interaction and we will provide support to both the City and Applicants during project reviews and approval. Additionally, typical tasks of this On‐Call contract may include CEQA/NEPA documentation preparation and/or technical studies needed. Technical studies will be prepared on a project by project basis. The information below provides Chambers Group’s technical approach to accomplish the items outlined in the scope of services and includes technical approaches typically required for projects. Environmental Studies and Minor Environmental Documentation Chambers Group’s environmental planners led by, in association with other members of our team, have decades of experience providing CEQA compliance services for planning and development (residential, commercial, industrial) projects, water and sewer projects, transportation projects, buildings, parks, storm drains, restoration activities and other engineering‐type projects. Our team combines our experience with proven management techniques that focus on flexibility, responsiveness and accountability. Chambers Group also realizes that the complex processes necessary to produce legally‐defensible environmental documentation cannot be accomplished without a close relationship with City staff, and an in‐depth understanding of the City of Moorpark, project details and characteristics of the local environment. Our methods of effective communication and project management coordination will provide the City the necessary tools to manage the environmental process for private development and City initiated projects. Because we expect the majority of environmental documentation required will be in compliance with CEQA, the approaches delineated below are regarding CEQA compliance. If, however, a project is proposed that will receive federal funding or requires approval from a federal agency, a NEPA document will be required. Our approach to NEPA documents follows closely our CEQA approach and every attempt will be made to combine efforts for both processes, saving both time and costs. Chambers Group will assist the City with determining the appropriate level of CEQA documentation, supporting statements and required forms to support a project. From the onset of a project, Chambers Group will evaluate whether the action is considered to be a “project” subject to CEQA, has already completed sufficient CEQA analysis in an existing document, exempt from CEQA, or if it requires supplemental or new CEQA analysis. Chambers Group has extensive experience reviewing and preparing any of the following CEQA documents: Categorical Exemption / Statutory Exemption Negative Declaration (ND) / Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) Environmental Impact Report (EIR) (including Supplemental, Subsequent, Programmatic, Focused, and Master EIRs) Addenda to an EIR or ND/MND Every environmental planning team member serves on their local Board of Directors for the Association of Environmental Professionals (AEP) and Project Manager Meghan Gibson has been elected for state‐wide office within AEP as well. This level of expertise provides the City with a consultant who can utilize changes in CEQA and NEPA, whether they be legislative, legal, or administrative, to the City’s benefit. CEQA Categorical Exemption Chambers Group can provide assistance in the determination of what, if any the appropriate CE or Statutory Exemption (collectively referred to as CE) applies to the project, in accordance with Articles 18 and 19 of the CEQA Guidelines. 269 Request For Qualifications For On‐Call Environmental Consulting Services City of Moorpark 6 63202 Chambers Group can review and/or assist with the preparation of supporting statements and required forms for filing of the CE. As an example, Chambers Group was contracted with the City of Culver City to prepare an Environmental Impact Report to conduct city‐wide cable upgrades. As the project was kicking off, the California Supreme Court issued its decision in Berkeley Hillside Preservation v. City of Berkeley, which addressed the meaning of the “unusual circumstances” exception to CEQA categorical exemptions. This decision gave lead agency deference to making determinations on whether a project fit into a categorical exemption, including the application of exceptions to the exemptions, supported by substantial evidence. Upon issuance of this decision, the use of CE’s, when appropriate, were given the same legal standard of review of an EIR. As such, we recommended a change in our approach and prepared a CE, accompanied by a detailed Initial Study (IS). This saved the City nearly 70% of the original contract value and about 9 months off the schedule. CEQA Negative Declaration / Mitigated Negative Declaration The scope of work provides Chambers Group’s approach to review and/or preparation of an IS and ND for a small project, whether for a development application or City‐initiated application. There are instances when an IS and MND can be large and complicated, as in construction on undeveloped land within sensitive cultural resource areas or projects that may involve controversial matters. Technical studies may be required to support the findings in the IS and to develop mitigation measures. These studies could include biological resources technical reports, archaeological resources technical reports, historic structures evaluations, noise studies, air quality studies, geotechnical and traffic studies, all of which can be performed with Chambers Group’s project team. Chambers Group’s approach includes brief reconnaissance‐level field studies by an environmental analyst, biologist, and archaeologist to determine if more detailed technical studies are required. Environmental Impact Report In the event a project may warrant a preparation of an EIR, Chambers Group will review and prepare the needed technical studies, notices and drafts in accordance with CEQA guidelines. Such documents will include technical reports, draft EIR, notice of preparation, responses to comments, mitigation and monitoring plans, and the final EIR. Chambers Group will coordinate with our subconsultants, and approved subconsultants of the City to prepare legally defensible environmental documents for City projects. Addenda to an MND or EIR In the event that a previous environmental document was prepared for all or a portion of a project that is currently under review, an Addendum will be, in many cases, the appropriate CEQA document for the project. The benefits of an addendum include the elimination of a public review period and consultation under AB 52 or SB 18, and the application of the legal standard of review as the previous environmental document. Further, recent case law has confirmed that merely the advent of new resource areas (such as GHG, energy, or wildfire) is not enough in and of itself to constitute a “new circumstance” requiring subsequent or supplemental analysis. Chambers Group will assist with the determination of whether an addendum is appropriate and, if so, either the review or preparation of the supporting documentation. Mitigation Monitoring Chambers Group has the capabilities to provide mitigation monitoring for the City. Our biologists have 20+ Years of Mitigation Monitoring and Environmental Training Services. 270 Request For Qualifications For On‐Call Environmental Consulting Services City of Moorpark 7 63202 Chambers Group’s mitigation monitoring services include the following: Mitigation monitoring plans Coordination with agencies to determine specific program element responsibilities Preconstruction and focused surveys for sensitive species and nesting birds Water Quality analysis Worker Environmental Awareness Program trainings Onsite monitoring to ensure compliance Environmental Compliance and Permit tracking SWPPP and BMP inspections Post‐construction documentation of compliance with the project plan Restoration Ecology and Revegetation Plans and Implementation Land Imprinting and mycorrhizal inoculation We work closely with clients during project construction to ensure that mitigation monitoring and permit compliance are conducted efficiently without disrupting the schedule. Our staff can provide the permitting applications, mitigation monitoring plans and habitat restoration plans in conjunction with an EIR, or as a separate document. Chambers Group also works with construction crews and other consultants to train them on avoiding sensitive resources in the project area of impact. Additionally, our team has ample experience preparing Cultural Resource Monitoring Programs that can be tailored for each project, accordingly, based on the known resources and concerns within the project area. Monitors will document field observations, photograph and record monitoring activities and findings daily. Any significant archaeological findings shall be preserved as determined necessary by the qualified archaeologist and any significant resources shall be offered to the appropriate federally recognized curation facility. Any resulting reports and/or site forms shall be filed with the CHRIS South Coastal Information Center at San Diego State University Peer Review As identified in the Scope of Services in the Request for Proposal, Chambers Group is prepared to provide CEQA peer review services on applicant‐prepared CEQA documents and/or CEQA/NEPA documents from neighboring jurisdictions. Applicant and City‐prepared CEQA documents and technical studies will be reviewed by Chambers Group to ensure that each resource area has been adequately analyzed and questions in the checklist have been answered thoroughly. Chambers Group will review any regulatory information pertinent to the project and call out any changes required based on guidelines published by the Office of Planning and Research if applicable. Either CEQA‐level or detailed technical reviews will be completed on technical studies provided depending on the level of effort needed by the City or Applicant. Biological Resources Conducting habitat assessments, general and protocol surveys for listed species, impact evaluations, and construction monitoring and reporting plans and implementation for complex and sensitive projects is Chambers Group’s specialty. Chambers Group’s staff has an ongoing relationship with many state and local agencies, and the firm’s 40‐year presence in California has given the firm unique expertise in understanding evolving environmental legislation and meeting the stringent requirements of federal, state, and local regulatory agencies. Our biological resources staff hold permits from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) and California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) for collecting select species, conducting protocol surveys of sensitive species, following specialized habitat evaluation procedures, and preparing relocation and monitoring plans specific to each project to allow flexibility during construction. The biology staff includes biologists, botanists and restoration ecologists who survey for sensitive wildlife and plant species as well as specialize in restoration, revegetation, and soil analysis. In addition, Chambers Group staff are certified to perform jurisdictional and wetland delineations and preparation of permit applications. 271 Request For Qualifications For On‐Call Environmental Consulting Services City of Moorpark 8 63202 Chambers Group biologists will prepare biological technical documents, develop mitigation measures during the final design to avoid, minimize, and/or compensate for impacts to biological resources, prepare any required restoration and mitigation monitoring plans, and create environmental compliance matrices that will allow the City of Moorpark project managers to track compliance with all required mitigation and protection measures. Chambers Group biologists will coordinate with wildlife agencies and assist in a full range of consultant services under federal and state endangered species acts, including USFWS Section 7 and Section 10 Habitat Conservation Plans and CDFW Incidental Take Permits. Our staff provides permit assistance for all project aspects (including a U.S. Army Corps of Engineers [USACE] Clean Water Act Section 404 permit, CDFW Section 1602 Lake and Streambed Alteration Agreement, and Regional Water Quality Control Board [RWQCB] Section 401 Water Quality Certification). In addition, our staff will communicate and coordinate with City of Moorpark staff, resource agencies, and construction contractors regarding project schedules and the effects of design changes on the environment. Our staff will anticipate issues and provide solutions to avoid conflict. Biological Resources Services Chambers Group’s Biological Resources Department consists of qualified wildlife biologists, botanists, regulatory specialists, and restoration ecologists. Chambers Group biologists provide presence/absence surveys, evaluation of habitats, wildlife corridor analysis, and analysis of population parameters. Our team members hold specific USFWS and CDFW permits and MOUs to work and survey for sensitive wildlife species, including: Rare plants Western burrowing owl Bats (visual and acoustic) Fairy shrimp Least Bell’s vireo Coastal California gnatcatcher Southwestern willow flycatcher Western yellow‐billed cuckoo light‐footed clapper rail Arroyo toad Red‐legged frog Southwestern pond turtle California legless lizard Two‐stripe garter snake Santa Ana speckled dace Steelhead trout Arroyo chub Unarmored three‐spined stickleback Chambers Group staff provides assistance with formal consultations with the USFWS pursuant to Sections 7 and 10 of the ESA and associated Biological Assessments and Habitat Conservation Plans, and CDFW 2081 and 2080.1 Incidental Take Permits and Consistency Determinations. Chambers Group also assists clients in fulfilling the requirements of the ESA, Clean Water Act and Migratory Bird Treaty Act. Biological Resource Literature Review and Reconnaissance Survey Chambers Group first conducts a literature review to determine if there are any existing records of listed and/or sensitive plant and wildlife species occurring on or in the vicinity of the site. The database review typically includes the United States Geological Survey (USGS) 7.5‐minute topographic quadrangle containing the site, the CDFW California Natural Diversity Database (CNDDB), the USFWS sensitive species occurrence database and critical habitat areas, and the California Native Plant Society’s Electronic Inventory (CNPSEI), National Wetland Inventory (NWI), the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) general soils map, previous vegetation maps and biological surveys prepared for the site (if available), and aerial photographs of the area prior to surveying the site for current relevant information. In addition, biological information included in reports previously prepared for closely related projects are reviewed and referenced. After the literature search, biologists conduct a reconnaissance‐level assessment to determine baseline conditions. A qualitative description, including the type of vegetation communities, common and sensitive biological resources, and relative extent of these communities, is provided for the project site. The field survey focuses on determining the 272 Request For Qualifications For On‐Call Environmental Consulting Services City of Moorpark 9 63202 presence or potential presence of federal or state‐listed or otherwise sensitive plant and wildlife species and habitats. A wildlife corridor analysis is conducted to analyze how wildlife is potentially utilizing the site. A constraints analysis can be conducted to reduce expensive back‐end mitigation (if engineering will allow for changes to project design). This could include identifying areas that have been previously disturbed that can be utilized for proposed project boundaries and staging areas during construction. The results of the survey are recorded on standardized data sheets, and photographs are taken to document the habitats in the project area. All species of plants and animals observed during the survey are recorded and listed to be used for permitting and/or environmental documentation. The biologists also determine, during the reconnaissance survey, if any wetlands, vernal pools, and/or waters of the United States subject to the jurisdiction of the regulatory agencies are present. Biological Technical Reports The report will summarize the results of the sensitive species and general biological surveys and include current photographs and maps documenting current site conditions and sensitive species locations (if observed). A sensitive species table that includes wildlife and plants observed or expected to occur onsite also will be provided. The report will identify if a wildlife corridor is present on site. The report will identify whether any areas that potentially may be under USACE, RWQCB, or CDFW jurisdiction are present on the site. The information within the technical report serves as the basis for evaluating project impacts to biological resources. The results of the focused surveys (if needed) are included in the final technical report. Avoidance and protection measures can be prepared and included in the report, if requested. Field notes and survey forms from the surveys will be included as appendices to the report. Botanical Surveys Chambers Group conducts botanical surveys as required by resource agencies. Botanical surveys include database and library research to determine the sensitive plant species with potential to be present on a site and an evaluation of habitat type to determine the likelihood of presence of each plant species on the project site. Supplemental focused botanical surveys include compilation of an inventory of plant species observed on the project site, an examination of the site during the appropriate flowering season for the presence of sensitive plant species, and a determination of whether any sensitive plant species were found during the survey or not. Botanical surveys may include qualitative and/or quantitative floristic, vegetation mapping and health assessment surveys. Methods may include stratified or random walk transects, line intercept transect, line‐plot transects, belt transects, or other appropriate sampling techniques. Chambers Group prepares reports that satisfy regulatory agency requirements for botanical surveys. We also prepare Weed Management Plans and Restoration Mitigation Monitoring Plans, if required by the agencies. Protocol-level Surveys for State- and Federal-listed Wildlife Species Once a preliminary analysis (desktop analysis and general site assessment) has identified a potential presence for sensitive wildlife species to be present on a site, Chambers Group will work with the City of Moorpark to determine which species may be impacted by the proposed project and required focused surveys. We will identify the survey window and project schedule requirements as well as potential permitting application schedules. Chambers Group biologists hold permits from the USFWS and CDFW for conducting agency resource required protocol surveys of sensitive species, following specialized habitat evaluation and survey method procedures. Our survey team will be comprised of expert biologists to ensure agency validation of the survey results. Chambers Group will prepare reports that satisfy regulatory agency requirements for the wildlife surveys. If needed, we will prepare state and federal take permit applications for project associated impacts, and relocation and monitoring plans specific to the City of Moorpark project to allow flexibility during construction. CDFW Incidental Take Permitting Chambers Group will work with City engineers to assess if design changes are feasible and can avoid impacts to state threatened or endangered species. If impacts to state‐listed species are not avoidable, Chambers Group will assist the City of Moorpark with the CDFW consultation and preparation of an Incidental Take Permit application (2081(b) ‐ pursuant to the California ESA). We will determine if the take permit may be issued if the species is both state‐ and 273 Request For Qualifications For On‐Call Environmental Consulting Services City of Moorpark 10 63202 federal‐listed, in which the City of Moorpark (the permit applicant) must obtain a Federal Incidental Take Permit (Section 7 Consultation). Chambers Group will prepare the 2080.1 permit application and submit the Federal Opinion Incidental Take Permit to the Director of CDFW for a Consistency Determination, a 30‐day review process. If a Consistency Determination is not approved, the City of Moorpark must apply for a 2081(b) Incidental Take Permit. The 2081(b) process is normally completed in approximately 3‐6 months, depending on the timing of the submittal of the permit application and workload of CDFW staff. Jurisdictional Waters and/or Wetlands Delineations and Permit Applications Chambers Group is available to support the City of Moorpark by conducting wetland, vernal pool and jurisdictional delineations as necessary for proposed projects. For the purpose of identifying potential jurisdictional waters, Chambers Group will review existing maps and documents including the USGS 7.5‐minute topographic quadrangle of the site, general soils map, USFWS NWI maps, topographic maps, previous vegetation maps and biological surveys prepared for the site, and aerial photographs. The field surveys will identify and delineate waters that fall under the regulatory jurisdiction of the USACE pursuant to Section 404 of the CWA, RWQCB pursuant to Section 401 of the CWA, and CDFW jurisdiction pursuant to Section 1602 of the Fish and Game Code. After completing each delineation survey, Chambers Group will prepare a Jurisdictional Delineation Report for the proposed project summarizing the results of the delineation survey. Each report will include a discussion of potential regulatory constraints and the applicable permitting procedures that may be required for the project. Further, Chambers Group permitting team is well‐versed in the legal status of the EPA’s new rules under the Clean Water Act and will tailor jurisdictional delineations to account for potential changes in methodologies resulting from these pending revisions. Chambers Group will work with City engineers to assess if design changes are feasible and can avoid impacts to jurisdictional waters and associated riparian habitat. If impacts to federal or state waters are not avoidable, Chambers Group will prepare permit applications for the agencies. Chambers Group will assist the City of Moorpark with submitting the notification package for a Streambed Alteration Agreement (SAA) permit (or emergency permit) for proposed impacts to state waters. Chambers Group will work with the City to determine if design changes could occur to reduce impacts and expedite the permitting schedule. CDFW generally requires that any impacts to streambeds and adjacent riparian habitats be fully mitigated. To promote rapid and favorable action on a 1602 notification for a SAA, a mitigation plan should be submitted with the notification package. It normally takes approximately 90 days for the CDFW to process a SAA permit application. A water quality certification, or waiver of certification, is required from the RWQCB for any activity that requires a Federal license or permit (such as a Section 404 Permit) and that may result in a discharge to jurisdictional waters. Preparing and processing a 401 Water Quality Certification application generally takes from 45 to 120 days from initial Agency submittal. Chambers Group will also prepare 404 permit applications. In compliance with the USACE 2007 Nationwide Permit Program conditions, an Individual Permit is generally required for projects that exceed the thresholds for a nationwide permit. A preliminary review of the proposed site plan would determine if an Individual Permit (IP) or Nationwide Permit (NWP) would be required. Processing an IP may take from 3 to 9 months from the time of initial Agency submittal. Processing a NWP generally takes from 45 to 120 days from initial Agency submittal. Chambers Group will assist the City of Moorpark with draft permit applications and permit application support documents in accordance to the schedule developed during the initial scoping and after receipt of the necessary background materials. Chambers Group will identify specific and reasonable impact ratios and negotiate mitigation measures and restoration requirements with the agencies throughout the permitting process. Chambers Group also will submit electronic and hard copies of the permit application package to the appropriate agency recipient. Biological Assessments for Section 7 Consultation with USFWS If the focused surveys and impact assessment determines that the City of Moorpark project would result in adverse effects to federal‐listed plant or wildlife species, then compliance with Section 7 of the Federal ESA would be warranted 274 Request For Qualifications For On‐Call Environmental Consulting Services City of Moorpark 11 63202 and a Biological Assessment (BA) would be required. Chambers Group is available to support the City of Moorpark by preparing all necessary BAs. The BA includes mitigation measures to reduce effects to a level where it may be possible to conclude the proposed project and alternatives are not likely to jeopardize the continued existence of any federally listed species or result in the adverse modification of designated critical habitat. The BA analyzes the potential impacts due to the proposed project and the alternatives on listed or proposed species, including an analysis of the impacts on designated and proposed essential and/or critical habitat, within the project’s area of effect. Because Chambers Group understands the time constraints associated with projects, identification of a federal nexus is critical to take advantage of statutory timeframes afforded to consultation under Section 7 of the ESA. If a federal nexus is not identified, Chambers Group is well versed in conducting consultation under Section 10 of the ESA and is currently processing an Incidental Take Permit and preparing a Habitat Conservation Plan in a process expected to require approximately 6 ‐ 12 months of consultation with the USFWS. Cultural Resources The following section includes tasks that meet the industry standards for environmental documentation pursuant to archaeological, cultural, paleontological, and tribal cultural resources management, and reflects the process Chambers Group will take for this contract with the City These services include literature reviews, field surveys, Sacred Lands File Searches, AB 52 notification and consultation (if needed), and CEQA technical reports are contingent upon the requirements of individual projects and task orders. Chambers Group understands we will be providing the development application process with services including peer review, IS preparation, and development/review of mitigation measures. For City‐initiated projects we will be preparing technical studies, attending meetings, and providing general cultural resource consultation, among other services. The Archaeological Resources work will be overseen by Cultural Resources Director, Mr. Ted Roberts M.A. RPA. Mr. Roberts meets the Secretary of the Interior Qualification Standards for Archaeology. The following scope will satisfy requirements under CEQA as well as adhere to all scheduling constraints outlined for the project. Cultural Resources Literature Review Chambers Group will conduct Cultural Resources Literature Reviews, including reviews of the findings of records search through the California Historical Resources Information System (CHRIS) database at the South Central Coastal Information Center (SCCIC) housed at California State University, Fullerton. The records searches will review relevant previously recorded cultural resources, previous investigations, and historic maps within a surrounding 0.5‐mile or 1‐ mile search radius, depending on the project. Information to be reviewed will include location maps for all previously recorded cultural resources, previously conducted investigation boundaries, National Archaeological Database (NADB) citations and copies for associated reports, historic maps, and historic addresses. Chambers Group will also review properties listed on/as the California Points of Historical Interest (CPHI), California Historical Landmarks (CHL), Caltrans Historic Highway Bridge Inventory, California Historical Resources Inventory, local city and county registries of historic properties, the California Register of Historic Resources (CRHR), and the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP). The task will also include a search for potential prehistoric and/or historic burials (human remains) evident in previous site records and/or historical maps. Paleontological Resources Literature Review Paleontological literature reviews will include a review of geological maps covering the project footprint to determine the fossil‐bearing rock units underlying the study area and archival searches for fossil specimens or unique geological formation reported within the project area or surrounding 0.5‐mile vicinity. Research will also include a review of published and unpublished reports relevant to the paleontology and geology of the project area. This information will be used to prepare the potential fossil yield classification (PFYC) analysis and to identify the baseline paleontological sensitivity of the project area. The results of the literature review will be included in the Paleontological Technical Report. 275 Request For Qualifications For On‐Call Environmental Consulting Services City of Moorpark 12 63202 Native American Heritage Commission Sacred Lands File Depending on project needs, Chambers Group will also request that the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) conduct a search of its Sacred Lands File (SLF) to determine if cultural resources important to Native Americans have been recorded in the project area. The NAHC will provide a list of projects affiliated Tribal Groups and representatives contact information that may have knowledge of cultural resources and sacred lands near the project area. In the event the City would like to send letters to each tribal represented listed on the NAHC list, then The Sacred Lands File search and NAHC contact will include a 0.5‐mile radius around the project area utilizing the project footprint. Additionally, the results of archival research discussed above will provide the baseline data to determine if there is any previous documentation of tribal cultural resources within or near the proposal project area. It is assumed that the City will take the lead on AB 52 Tribal Consultation regarding any potential Tribal Cultural Resources within the proposed project area; however, we have experience with assisting public agencies with their AB 52 Tribal Consultation needs. Assembly Bill 52 Consultation (AB52) Chambers Group will perform AB 52 Tribal Consultation Support on behalf of the City. As the Lead Agency, the City is required to provide formal notification to the designated contact or tribal representative of traditionally and culturally affiliated Native American tribes within the geographic area. Our team will prepare notification letters that include a brief project description and a map of the proposed project. Then, we will consult with the tribes to develop appropriate mitigation measures to avoid or minimize impacts to tribal cultural resources. Chambers Group cultural resource staff will ensure timeliness and responsiveness in AB 52 consultation process through proven QA/QC and project tracking methods. We will prepare a comprehensive Consultation Summary Report synthesizing all communications, landmarks, and milestones of the AB 52 process upon consultation completion. Archaeological Reconnaissance Survey To satisfy State requirements, Chambers Group archaeologists will conduct an Archaeological Reconnaissance Surveys of the project area on a project‐by‐project basis. The archaeol ogist will be equipped with a sub‐meter accurate GPS unit that will have the proposed project boundary delineated to document the areas that were assessed, those with limited access/visibility, and develop a sensitivity map based on the literature review and survey. Survey notes will include a description of the survey area, site conditions, and other relevant observations. Chambers Group will complete a systematic archaeological reconnaissance survey of the project area. The archaeological reconnaissance survey will review the project area for signs of: Prehistoric artifacts (e.g., flaked stone tools, ceramics, etc.), Tool‐making debris (flaked stone debitage), stone milling tools (manos and metates), bedrock milling stations (basins and slicks) Historic artifacts (e.g., metal, glass, ceramics), Sediment discoloration that might indicate the presence of a midden or other cultural feature, Depressions and other features indicative of the former presence of structures or buildings (e.g., post holes, foundations), Historic buildings, structures, or objects, and Tribal Cultural Resources. Note: Assumes the reconnaissance survey will result in no cultural resources within the project area. In the event resources are identified a revised cost and scope will be required to address and report on these findings. CEQA Archaeological Technical Report After completing the Archaeological Literature Review and Archaeological Reconnaissance Survey, Chambers Group will prepare CEQA Archaeological Technical Reports summarizing the literature reviews, survey results, and will include 276 Request For Qualifications For On‐Call Environmental Consulting Services City of Moorpark 13 63202 the following sections: (a) introduction, (b) proposed project description, (c) Summary of literature reviews, (d) methods used to conduct the surveys, (e) results of the existing conditions of cultural resources on the site, (f) recommendations, and (g) references cited. The report will include current photographs and maps documenting site conditions summary of any archaeological resources findings observed. The report will be provided within 15 days of completing the Archaeological Reconnaissance Survey. CEQA Paleontological Technical Report After completing the Paleontological Literature Review, Chambers Group will prepare Paleontological Technical Reports including the following sections: (a) introduction, (b) proposed project description, (d) results of the existing conditions of paleontological resources on the site, (e) recommendations, and (f) references cited. The report will include current photographs and maps documenting site conditions and a summary of any paleontological resources findings observed. The reports will be generally provided within 15 days of receiving the literature search results. Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Analysis: Vista Environmental will use the following tasks to support an Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Analysis: Identify the existing air quality setting in the area, including the local meteorological conditions. Identify greenhouse gases (GHGs) and their associated impacts to global climate change. Identify applicable federal, state, and SCAQMD rules and regulations, attainment plans and thresholds of significance for criteria pollutants and GHGs. Obtain existing air quality data from air quality monitoring stations within the study area utilizing California Air Resources Board (CARB) data sources. Evaluate and quantify regional criteria pollutant and GHG emissions associated with construction and operational activities for the proposed project utilizing the CalEEMod Model. Evaluate and quantify local criteria pollutant emissions associated with construction and operational activities for the proposed project utilizing SCAQMD’s Look‐Up Tables. Provide a qualitative odor analysis from the construction and on‐going operations of the proposed project. Prepare an air quality and greenhouse gas emissions report that documents the results of the previous work tasks. Noise Impact Analysis: Vista Environmental will use the following tasks to support a Noise Impact Analysis: Identify transportation‐related noise sources such as major roadways and aircraft noise (if any), and stationary (non‐transportation related) noise impacts from adjacent land uses to the project study area. Identify applicable noise regulations and thresholds of significance. Evaluate the existing noise environment and obtain either 15‐minute or 24‐hour noise measurements in the vicinity of the Project. Utilize the Federal Highway Administration’s Roadway Construction Noise Model (RCNM) to analyze potential noise impacts associated with construction activities and identify measures to minimize the noise impacts to the nearby sensitive receptors. For the installation of equipment that would create noise, obtain either manufacturer noise specifications or a reference noise measurement of similar equipment. Utilize typical sound drop‐off rates to calculate 277 Request For Qualifications For On‐Call Environmental Consulting Services City of Moorpark 14 63202 the operational noise impact from the proposed equipment at the nearest sensitive receptors and compare the results with the appropriate noise standards. Analyze potential vibration impacts associated with construction and operational activities through application of the methodology used in the Transportation‐ and Construction‐Induced Vibration Guidance Manual (Vibration Guidance Manual), prepared for Caltrans. Prepare a noise impact report that documents the results of the previous work tasks. Geology and Soils Haley & Aldrich will develop, or peer review the Geology and Soils section of the EIR. This section will address the local environmental setting (regional and local geology, faults and seismic history, seismic mapping and seismic hazards). The section will include a discussion of the regulatory framework governing geologic, seismic and soil hazards (e.g., Alquist‐Priolo Earthquake Zoning Act, Seismic Hazard Mapping Act California Building Code and the California Health and Safety Code and local policies and regulations). The section will also consider thresholds of significance appearing in Appendix G of the CEQA Guidelines specific to geologic resources and soils and whether the project would have the potential for significant impacts. Mitigation measures for the potentially significant impacts will be identified. Cumulative impacts of other projects on the proposed project will also be evaluated. The level of significance after the implementation of the mitigation measures will also be identified. The deliverable will be a stand‐alone section for inclusion in the overall EIR, or a letter report summarizing the results of the peer review. Hazards and Hazardous Materials Haley & Aldrich will develop, or peer review the Hydrology and Water Quality section of the EIR. Hazards will be identified and described using readily available sources as required by CEQA. The EIR will describe whether the hazards identified have the potential for significant impact and mitigation measures that will be proposed so that the hazards are less than significant. The deliverable will be a stand‐alone section for inclusion in the overall EIR, or a letter report summarizing the results of the peer review. Hydrology and Water Quality Haley & Aldrich will develop, or peer review the Hydrology and Water Quality section of the EIR. This section will address the local environmental setting (regional hydrology, local hydrology and drainages, water supply, surface water quality, groundwater resources, flood hazards, and dams). The section will include a discussion of the regulatory framework governing the uses and protection of water resources (e.g., Federal Clean Water Act, California Porter‐Cologne Water Quality Act, municipal stormwater requirements, local ordinances). It will also provide an evaluation of potential short term (construction) and long term (operational) project impacts on hydrology and water quality as well as alternative mitigation measures to address them. The deliverable will be a stand‐alone section for inclusion in the overall EIR, or a letter report summarizing the results of the peer review. Utilities and Service Systems Haley & Aldrich will develop, or peer review the section of the EIR to analyze the potential environmental effects of the proposed project on public utilities. Utilities to be analyzed include: Potable Water Supplies and Service Systems Water Distribution Systems Wastewater Collection and Treatment Systems Stormwater Collection and Conveyance Systems Solid Waste Collection and Disposal Electric Power 278 Request For Qualifications For On‐Call Environmental Consulting Services City of Moorpark 15 63202 Natural Gas Telephone and Communications Systems (e.g., telephone, mobile phone, internet, cable) Haley & Aldrich will review the current status of each of these utilities with regard to the Federal, State, Regional, and Local regulatory framework governing them. Based on this review, we will evaluate the potential thresholds of significance in accordance with the CEQA Guidelines Appendix G to identify whether the proposed project might have a significant adverse impact on utilities and service systems. For example, Haley & Aldrich will evaluate whether the proposed project will exceed the capacity of existing water supply, wastewater treatment, stormwater conveyance, electric power, or other existing utilities such that it would require augmentation or construction of new facilities which could cause significant environmental impacts or could result in noncompliance with regulations. The deliverable will be a stand‐alone section for inclusion in the overall EIR, or a letter report summarizing the results of the peer review. Traffic Impact Studies LLG has extensive experience in the preparation and review of traffic impact studies of development projects in compliance with the requirements of CEQA. We have a broad range of experience in the preparation of traffic impact assessments for development projects in support of Initial Studies, Mitigated Negative Declarations, and Environmental Impact Reports. LLG’s traffic studies are prepared in consider ation of both the technical reviewer, as well as the general public. LLG has substantial experience in presenting its findings at public meetings and hearings. For the City of Moorpark, LLG is able to prepare traffic impact assessments, as well as provide peer review services related to traffic studies submitted on behalf of project applicants. Examples of the services that LLG can provide include: Trip generation studies of unique land uses, Site access and internal circulation review of development projects for vehicles (cars and delivery trucks), pedestrians and bicycles, Assessment of intersection and roadway link traffic impacts using Level of Service calculations, Review and assessment of potential traffic mitigation (e.g., roadway modification) measures, and Development of transportation demand management measures aimed at reducing vehicular trip generation. Senate Bill 743 – Vehicle Miles Travelled On September 27, 2013, Senate Bill (SB) 743 was signed and adopted. SB 743 creates a process to change the way transportation impacts under the California Environmental Quality Act are assessed. Currently, environmental review of transportation impacts focuses on the delay that vehicles experience at intersections and on roadway segments. That delay is usually measured using a metric known as “level of service,” or LOS. Mitigation for increased delay often involves increasing capacity (i.e., the width of a roadway or size of an intersection), which may increase auto use and emissions and discourage alternative forms of transportation. Under SB 743, the focus of transportation analysis will shift from driver delay to reduction of greenhouse gas emissions, the creation of multimodal networks and promotion of a mix of land uses. Draft guidelines have been published by the Office of Planning and Research. Although SB 743 only applies to new projects after the guidelines come into effect, a VMT analysis may be considered for current projects to proactively evaluate transportation impacts. LLG can calculate VMT in coordination with traffic model data provided by the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG). The relative VMT impact can be determined based on the City’s adopted thresholds of significance, or through use of the guidelines set forth by SB 734. LLG will evaluate several alternative approaches to determine a possible impact. LLG will consider the mitigation measures listed in Updating Transportation Impact Analysis in the CEQA Guidelines: Preliminary Discussion Draft of Updates to the CEQA Guidelines Impalement Senate Bill 743 and several other innovative mitigation measures. 279 Request For Qualifications For On‐Call Environmental Consulting Services City of Moorpark 16 63202 Transportation Planning LLG is well‐versed in emerging areas of transportation planning whereby all modes are evaluated. This includes appropriate consideration for pedestrians and bicyclists, as well as to vehicles. In addition, LLG is highly capable in providing services in the “traditional” areas of transportation planning that typically arise. Services that can be provided by LLG for the City of Moorpark include: Travel speed surveys/traffic volume counts, Residential traffic calming plans, Review of roadway segments for complete street applications, and Routes to school plans Parking LLG has extensive experience in the determination of parking needs for land uses (existing and proposed) through the preparation of Code parking analyses, detailed parking accumulation and utilization surveys, and shared parking demand analyses. Other specialized parking surveys and reviews include neighborhood parking intrusion surveys and detailed parking management plans associated with multi‐use and special event land uses. Relevant Project Experience On-Call Environmental Services, Los Angeles County Client: Los Angeles County Department of Public Works (LACDPW) Chambers Group has provided on‐call environmental services to LACDPW since 1993, completing over 200 task orders for Programs Development Division, Water Resources Division, Flood Maintenance Division, Flood Control District, including: Conducting a variety of technical studies including cultural, biological, water quality, air quality, noise, aesthetics, and other environmental topics Providing CEQA compliance by preparing EIRs, MNDs, and Categorical Exclusions Preparing documents for LACDPW projects Decommissioning of historic flood control dams Providing environmental analysis and reports for specialized flood control projects, bridge repair/replacement projects, reservoir and basin cleanout projects, and road improvements/repairs Chambers Group continues to provide services to LACDPW, frequently providing quick turnaround to meet County scheduling requirements. Types of services provided by Chambers Group include: Cultural Resources studies Biological studies CEQA and NEPA analysis Wetlands delineations and water permit applications Constraints Analysis Sensitive species and nesting bird surveys Compliance monitoring Hydrogeomorphic analysis BMP and Water Quality Plans Habitat restoration and revegetation plans and implementation 280 Request For Qualifications For On‐Call Environmental Consulting Services City of Moorpark 17 63202 Our scope of services also included: Project Management Biological Resources surveys Mitigation and Compliance Monitoring Cultural Resources surveys Identification of required permits from regulatory agencies Subcontractor oversight Close, collaborative coordination with LACDPW Responses to public comments City of Beaumont On-Call for Environmental Consulting Services, Beaumont, CA Client: City of Beaumont Commencing in July 2016, Chambers Group has completed a series of task orders to support the City with general CEQA compliance as well as peer review of project applications and CEQA documents. Chambers Group has provided guidance and assistance with the preparation of all required environmental impact documentation (including CEQA documents, Consistency Evaluations, Environmental Check Lists, etc.); preparation and/or peer review of technical environmental reports and analyses (greenhouse gas studies, traffic studies, noise studies, surveys, water supply assessments, etc.); participation and testimony in public meetings; and, consultation on CEQA processes and requirements. The following are examples of task orders under this contract: Beaumont Sixth Street Sewer, Beaumont, CA. Chambers Group provided a Peer Review of an IS/ND and technical studies (air quality, biological resources, and cultural resources) for a sewer line project. Hidden Canyon Industrial Park Plot Specific Plan Updated Site Plan Review, Beaumont, CA. The City of Beaumont requested the assistance of Chambers Group to support the City for the Hidden Canyon Industrial Park Plot Plan (Project). The Project proposes to construct a 2.89 million square foot warehouse project in two buildings. Chambers Group provided support to City Staff in reviewing the proposed project plot plan and preparing Staff reports and presentations. Further, Chambers Group attended and answered questions from elected officials and the public at planning commission and City Council meetings. IS/MND for Commercial Center, Beaumont, CA. The Beaumont Commercial Center is a commercial shopping center consisting of approximately 37,800 square feet of shopping center, a 4,300‐square foot bread/donut/bagel shop, a 4,370‐square foot car wash, and an 8‐service bay tire store. The proposed project site covers a total of 7.07 acres. The remaining area of the project site would consist of 56,991 square feet of landscaping and 188,947 square feet of roads and walkways. Chambers Group evaluated the permit application for compliance with the City’s General and Specific Plan and conducting peer review of the Applicant‐prepared IS/MND to evaluate impacts associated with the project and ensure compliance with CEQA. Oakridge RV Storage, City of Beaumont, CA. The proposed project would develop a recreational vehicle storage facility on a 2.67‐acre parcel in the City of Beaumont east of Maple Avenue and north for First Street. The project site is located on a privately owned, undeveloped property in the City of Beaumont. Chambers Group evaluated the Cultural Resources Report, Biological Survey Report, Draft IS / MND, and Air Quality and Noise analyses. Any Size RV and Boat Storage CEQA Peer Review, Beaumont, CA. A 3.15‐acre project site consisting of two parcels located on the north side of Sixth Street between Xenia Avenue and American Avenue in the City of Beaumont. The proposed project is to develop and outdoor storage facility of RV’s, trailers, and boats. Chambers Group evaluated the Archaeological Survey, Water Quality Management Plan, IS and Air Quality studies for the proposed project. 281 Request For Qualifications For On‐Call Environmental Consulting Services City of Moorpark 18 63202 The Rincon Development (formerly Golden Triangle Project), Chino Hills, CA Client: City of Chino Hills The Rincon Development project site is currently designated for Commercial land uses in the General Plan and is zoned as Freeway Commercial. Development of the proposed project would be consistent with these existing land use and zoning designations. The proposed project site consists of approximately 10.42‐acre parcel (APN 1028‐351‐47) located at the southwest corner of the intersection of Soquel Canyon Parkway off‐ramp and State Route 71 (SR 71), under the jurisdiction of the City of Chino Hills The project site consists of a vacant parcel surrounded by existing and future commercial, residential, and institutional development. The Soquel Canyon Parkway off‐ramp and SR 71 intersection is located directly north of the project site. SR‐71 traverses along the eastern boundary of the project site, while Soquel Canyon Parkway traverses along the western boundary. The proposed project would develop a 157,100‐square‐foot mixed use commercial center consisting of the following components: 60,000‐square‐foot four‐story hotel with 116 rooms 60,000 square‐foot medical office with subterranean parking 20,475 square‐feet of retail 16,625 square‐feet of restaurants Chambers Group prepared an IS/MND to evaluate impacts associated with the project and ensure compliance with CEQA. The Chambers Group team included Vista Environmental who prepared the air quality, greenhouse gas, and noise analyses. The Rincon Development Amendment Project Chino Hills, CA Client: City of Chino Hills In 2016, an IS/MND was prepared by Chambers Group to evaluate impacts associated with a 2015 mixed commercial center site plan at the 10.42‐acre project site. In 2017, the project site owner and applicant submitted an amended site plan to the City. The 2015 site plan, which proposed 157,100 feet of development was revised to a proposed 201,304 square feet of development. The new proposed 2017 site plan required preparation of a Subsequent MND. Chambers Group prepared the Subsequent MND, which was approved by the Planning Commission on February 5, 2019. The Subsequent MND incorporated technical studies including a Traffic Impact Analysis and updated analysis regarding air quality, greenhouse gas emissions, and noise. 282 Request For Qualifications For On‐Call Environmental Consulting Services City of Moorpark 19 63202 References Los Angeles County Department of Public Works (LACDPW) Contact: Melanie Morita Phone Number: (626) 458‐6196 Email Address: mmorita@dpw.lacounty.gov City of Beaumont Contact: Christina Taylor, Community Development Director Phone Number: (951) 572‐3212 Email Address: ctaylor@beaumontca.gov City of Chino Hills Contact: Michael Hofflinger, Senior Planner Phone Number: (909) 364‐2600 Email Address: mhofflinger@chinohills.org 283 Request For Qualifications For On‐Call Environmental Consulting Services City of Moorpark 20 63202 Cost Proposal Chambers Group 284 Request For Qualifications For On‐Call Environmental Consulting Services City of Moorpark 21 63202 Haley & Aldrich 285 Request For Qualifications For On‐Call Environmental Consulting Services City of Moorpark 22 63202 Vista Environmental FULLY BURDENED STANDARD HOURLY RATE SCHEDULE Effective January 1, 2019 Schedule of fees for Professional Services Time Charges Hourly Rate Senior Analyst (Greg Tonkovich) $ 120.00 Reimbursable Expenses Travel: Private vehicles @ $0.56 per mile. Commercial travel and related expenses at cost. Taxes: Any tax and/or fees imposed by a taxing authority based upon gross revenues or sales shall be reimbursable in addition to the fee stated in this Agreement. Other Project expenses: Cost. If Project expenses other than those mentioned above are necessary, Vista Environmental will obtain prior approval from the client and will charge the client at cost for the expense. LLG TITLE PER HOUR Principals Principal $255 Associate Principal $229 Planning/Design Manager $213 Transportation Engineers Senior Transportation Engineer $189 Transportation Engineer III $167 Transportation Engineer II $141 Transportation Engineer I $121 Transportation Planners Senior Transportation Planner $167 Transportation Planner III $141 Transportation Planner II $121 Transportation Planner I $108 TITLE PER HOUR Technical Support Engineering Associate II $120 Engineering Associate I $116 Engineering Computer Analyst II $114 Engineering Computer Analyst I $90 Senior CADD Drafter $116 CADD Drafter III $108 CADD Drafter II $95 CADD Drafter I $82 Senior Engineering Technician $116 Engineering Technician II $108 Engineering Technician I $82 Word Processor/Secretary $76 Engineering Aide I $58 286 Request For Qualifications For On‐Call Environmental Consulting Services City of Moorpark 23 63202 Additional Information Project Methods Project Management and Communication Approach Our firm has developed a systematic approach to project management of on‐call contracts. Our staff is adept at managing simultaneous tasks at multiple sites, expediting project schedules and ensuring consistent, high‐quality delivery, from preparing permit packages and organizing preconstruction surveys to overseeing compliance monitoring and restoration. Our approach will provide the City the necessary tools to manage the environmental process for private development and City initiated projects. Strict and defined communication procedures are vital for contract success, and as such, Chambers Group will provide the City with a communication protocol, including the chain of communication during all project work with whom and when to contact. In addition, the firm has developed an efficient system for managing subconsultants in order to keep abreast of subconsultants' progress on the project and identify potential problems before they arise. This plan is in place to minimize delays during unforeseen circumstances in that other team members can easily step in to perform the needed tasks. At Chambers Group, effective communication begins with actively listening to our client’s needs on a consistent basis. Communication with the City will be established through the Project Manager and other designated team members and maintained consistently along with support from Technical Managers to provide access to the combined expertise at our firm. This constant contact ensures that the City of Moorpark Project Manager is informed about project activities thereby providing frequent opportunities to ask questions about the project, and to assure that there are no unresolved problems. Individual team members will report findings to the Chambers Group Project Manager and work together to take any corrective actions necessary to ensure a quality project is delivered on time and in budget. All unforeseen work or deviation from the scope assumptions will be tracked and prompt notification will be provided to the City of Moorpark for review and approval prior to implementation. Chambers Group is committed to maintaining good working relationships with all city departments, all other jurisdictions, and the public. The Project Manager would coordinate or support the City for all consultation with federal, state, and local agencies for a proposed project. Our strategy for outside agency consultation will be based on City input, the project type and the regulatory staff involved. In some cases, it is advantageous to bring all parties together to discuss the project (CDFG, USACE, RWQCB, USFWS, USFS, BLM). At other times a streamlined approach can help overcome obstacles. Problem Solving Chambers Group prides itself in innovative thinking and problem solving for all projects that Chambers Group staff works on. We have several proven systems in place to prevent project delays due to unforeseen staff changes. Our staffing plan for each project will identify staff members qualified to serve as back‐up for key personnel, if ever needed. These staff members will already be part of the team and have current knowledge of the project. Our team knows how to mobilize on very short notice. So even when the unexpected occurs, we will respond to the City’s needs immediately ‐ regardless of rigorous conditions or demanding schedules ‐ to be onsite and problem‐solving within just a few hours or less. Our staff is cross‐trained to perform multiple tasks, making transition to new tasks swift and efficient. Our biologists and cultural staff also write reports and CEQA document sections. We encourage our staff to establish and maintain agency and client relationships, making transitions easier. 287 Request For Qualifications For On‐Call Environmental Consulting Services City of Moorpark 24 63202 We specifically analyze each project to determine the most appropriate level of CEQA documentation, ensuring that we don’t over scope an unnecessary document. With a depth of planning staff, we can work within strict timeframes to meet deadlines; we have even successfully had an MND certified in under 50 days from NTP. Cost Control and Progress Reporting Chambers Group uses Deltek Vision, to track project costs. Raw costs are loaded into the computer daily (staff hours on a weekly basis) to give the project manager up‐to‐date data and timely management reports. Costs and/or staff hours can be quickly and accurately compared to budgeted costs/hours on a project, task, or activity basis. Weekly, on a work in progress basis, the percent of project cost expended is compared to estimated percent completion. Any variance of project/task cost versus budget, is immediately flagged. This ensures early identification of possible cost overruns and appropriate remedy. Progress is also tracked monthly with a senior management team. In this way, each task is monitored for maximum efficiency and, if necessary, early action is taken to achieve strict budget adherence. Chambers Group will generate and submit monthly invoices using the City’s preferred format and consistent with all specifications and requirements, including a detailed breakdown of the services provided, tasks, hours, personnel and staff type, and hour rates. A monthly progress report, inclusive of Chambers Group and our subconsultants work completed, will be submitted with each invoice. The progress report will include an overview of tasks accomplished during the billing period, which deliverables were submitted, the anticipated work for the next month, any pending issues to be discussed, and scheduled dates for deliverables. In addition, resource allocation is reflected in overall business objectives. For maximum efficiency, resource managers can view and manage resource breakdown structures for the project. This benefits the project management process with the following: Multi‐project Analysis: Cross project reporting for optimization of resources. The relative priority of projects can be adjusted to ensure that higher priority projects have access to resources first. Shared Resource Pools: Staff has full visibility when scheduling resources so that project deliverables are not delayed, affecting schedule and cost. Reserved Resources: Key project resources can be targeted for specific activities, so they are not delayed and do not run up costs. Shared Ancillary Data: Calendars, Resource Budgeting Schedules, and Work Breakdown Schedules can be developed at the project level then made available in corporate‐wide reporting libraries, which assures plan, cost, and reporting consistency across the enterprise. Work Methodology The Project Manager would coordinate with and support City of Moorpark for all consultation with the agencies for each task order. This section identifies the typical practice for all projects as part of the general on‐call environmental and technical services contract. Our Project Managers will commit all necessary resources to meet project objectives. The primary function of the Project Manager is to ensure that City of Moorpark’ technical, financial, scheduling, and safety requirements are fulfilled. The Chambers Group Project Manager will work as an extension of City of Moorpark staff to optimize the communication between the team. The Project Manager will provide clear and effective communication with regular updates from project staff, tracking internal tasks against the project’s budget and schedule and by holding monthly internal briefings to assess the project’s progress. The Project Manager is responsible for the overall quality of the document in terms of technical presentation, defensibility, and readability. The Project Manager will: 288 Request For Qualifications For On‐Call Environmental Consulting Services City of Moorpark 25 63202 Serve as the direct liaison among the project team, corporate management, subcontractors, agencies, and City of Moorpark for the on‐call services; Provide direction to the team members, task leads, technical staff, cost analysts, and support personnel; Proactively identify problems, formulate solutions, and communicate them to the project team; Establish documentation procedures consistent with client and regulatory requirements; and Monitor overall technical progress and activities implemented to meet schedule and budget requirements. Select key personnel for each project from those identified in this proposal to reflect the technical disciplines depicted in the scope of work and commit these resources to meet the project schedule; Take responsibility for costs, schedules, and deliverables; Serve as spokesperson at public meetings and hearings; and Provide document quality for overall technical presentation, defensibility, and readability. Chambers Group’s managers, production, and editorial support staff conduct continuous QC of the project deliverables. Chambers Group will coordinate with the City of Moorpark in order to provide the quality of document expected. Chambers Group has a detailed Quality Assurance/Quality Control (QA/QC) process that: Articulates goals for deliverables that are understandable and achievable to the project team; Clearly defines the roles, responsibilities, and authorities for project QC; and Develops consensus on what strategies to use to reach project goals. Quality Assurance/Quality Control (QA/QC) Program Chambers Group has a well‐established QA/QC program ensuring the quality of our work. We evaluate all deliverables based on the scope of work, contract, and client expectations. Quality assurance will document the quality control program, outlining any concerns, issues, and reporting on any corrective steps taken to guarantee a quality deliverable. All deliverables, including daily monitoring forms, will undergo QA/QC by key staff members. Chambers Group has a detailed Quality Assurance/Quality Control (QA/QC) process that: Articulates goals for deliverables that are understandable and achievable to the project team; Clearly defines the roles, responsibilities, and authorities for project QC; and Develops consensus on what strategies to use to reach project goals. Our QA/QC process is consistent and effective in its procedures: The Designated Biologist provides a copy of the draft document, and scope of work to a technical reviewer. After the review, modifications are made, and the report is submitted to the Chambers Group Project Manager. The Project Manager compares the document to the task objectives. If the document does not meet the technical objectives, the biologist makes necessary changes to correct the document and the Project Manager accepts the track changes as appropriate. The final steps are a review for grammar and readability by a Technical Editor and word processor for the correct format. 289 Request For Qualifications For On-Call CHAMBERS Environmental Consulting Services GROUP City of Moorpark • After completing the QC process,the document is prepared for delivery to the City of Moorpark team. • The Chambers Group Project Manager maintain copies of QA paperwork for all Project deliverables. Project Schedules and Reviews Chambers Group uses Microsoft Project to develop its work schedules. The exact schedule of any task will be based upon the individual project. Schedules include time for review and meetings for the City of Moorpark to review the deliverables,work progress,provide direction, resolve problems,and ensure adherence for the work completion. As the project progresses, the schedule would be updated and revised as needed,to respond to changing conditions, and only at the City of Moorpark'direction.In response to conditional changes,Chambers Group will work with the City of Moorpark to determine the cause for any delay and take corrective actions to readjust the schedule. Schedule changes due to circumstances beyond participants control will be immediately brought to the attention of the City of Moorpark and readjusted with the City of Moorpark' approval. Actions to ensure schedule adherence may include adding additional technical professionals to complete the task or reassess the direction of the task and utilize new personnel.Chambers Group does not anticipate schedule delays on projects; however,the firm is prepared to address them. Signature Alex Gurrola has signature authority to bind Chambers Group to the terms listed in the RFP. Authorization /// - Alex Gurrola Chief Executive Officer 26 CHAMBERS 'W GROUP 63202 www.chambersgroupinc.com 290 Request For Qualifications For On‐Call Environmental Consulting Services City of Moorpark Appendix A: Project Team Resumes 291 1 Meghan Gibson Environmental Planning | Environmental Impact Analyses Project Manager Professional Experience Meghan Gibson has more than ten years of experience providing environmental planning and policy services to public and private clients. She has experience managing both large- and small-scale projects that involved California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) documents. She is responsible for preparing CEQA documentation, including Initial Studies (ISs), Mitigated Negative Declarations (MNDs), and Environmental Impact Reports (EIRs.) In addition to her CEQA experience, Meghan has prepared multiple joint CEQA/ NEPA documents, again, to both public and private clients. She also has extensive experience preparing mitigation monitoring summary reports and compiling information from both survey and monitoring data. Project Experience City of Chino Hills, Rincon (Formerly Golden Triangle) Development Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration, Chino Hills, CA Project Manager. Meghan was Project Manager for the development and approval of an IS/MND consistent with CEQA. She coordinated with the City of Chino Hills and subconsultants to facilitate the process of preparing the IS/MND for public review. Chino Hills Golden Triangle LLC proposes to develop a 10.42-acre parcel located in the City of Chino Hills at the southwest corner of the Soquel Canyon Parkway off-ramp and State Route 71 (SR 71) as a 157,100-square-foot mixed commercial center. The Rincon Development Amendment Project, City of Chino Hills, El Centro, CA. Project Manager. Meghan was the Project Manager for supplemental documentation for the Rincon Development Amendment Project. Since the approval of the 2016 IS/MND, the developer revised the site plan and Meghan prepared a Subsequent MND to analyze the changes to the original Project. The subsequent analysis included additional technical analysis for air quality, greenhouse gas emissions, noise, and traffic. The results from the technical reports were incorporated into a Subsequent MND as additional mitigation measures were required for the proposed changes. Quasi-Industrial Floor Area Ratio (FAR) General Plan Amendment, City of San Juan Capistrano, San Juan Capistrano, Orange County, CA Project Manager. Provided environmental planning services for the analysis of the City’s proposed General Plan Amendment to increase FAR in the Quasi-Industrial land use designation. Meghan supported the project efforts through completing the Draft IS/ND for the City and supported the project as it moved through its public review period. The project and accompanying CEQA document were approved by City Council on February 6, 2018. EDUCATION MPP, Public Policy, Environmental Policy, University of Southern California, 2013 BS, Environmental Management, University of Redlands, 2009 TRAINING AEP Advanced CEQA Workshop, February 2018 NEPA Essentials Workshop, June 2018 AFFILIATIONS Association of Environmental Professionals: Los Angeles Chapter Board of Directors Chapter President 292 2 22-Unit Condominium Project, Environmental Impact Report, La Puente, CA Project Environmental Planner. Assisted with CEQA documentation for the 22-unit condominium project that would include the demolition of a historic theater. The Project included technical analysis for air quality, greenhouse gas emissions, and a historical assessment. Meghan wrote portions of the IS Checklist, and also reviewed the Draft EIR prior to public review. Rialto Precise Plan Initial Study, Rialto, San Bernardino County, CA Project Manager. Provided environmental planning services for the analysis of the proposed Rialto Precise Plan for Sirwin Enterprises (Project Applicant) in addition to technical studies including air quality, biological, cultural resources analysis, greenhouse gas emissions, and noise. The project required an expedited draft Initial Study, which was completed in 15 working days. The project included a convenience store, a quick service restaurant, and an automated car wash. Northwest Open Space Community Park Project, NUVIS and the City of San Juan Capistrano, San Juan Capistrano, Orange County, CA Project Environmental Planner. Meghan is supporting the effort to develop a public park in San Juan Capistrano by assisting with the preparation of CEQA documentation. Specifically, Meghan is assisting with the preparation of biological, cultural, and environmental planning services appropriate to the conceptual planning process and construction of a proposed public park within approximately 13.5 acres of the City’s Open Space. (05/2014 – current) AT&T Hwy 127 Project, Forkert Engineering and Surveying, Inc. and AT&T, Baker, San Bernardino County, CA Staff Environmental Planner. Meghan is assisting in the preparation of the Environmental Assessment/Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (EA/IS/MND) for fiber-optic cable installation activities from the unincorporated community of Baker, California, to Cell Site 9 at the United States (U.S.) Army National Training Center (NTC) at Fort Irwin. Environmental review included technical analysis for air quality, biological resources, cultural resources, noise and a jurisdictional delineation. AT&T Fiber-Optic Cable Replacement Project, Halloran Summit to Slash X Regeneration Station, CEQA and NEPA Compliance, AT&T, San Bernardino, CA Staff Environmental Planner. Meghan assisted in the preparation of the Environmental Assessment/Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (EA/IS/MND) for the maintenance/replacement of an approximately 88-mile portion of AT&T’s fiber-optic cable route. Environmental review included technical analysis for air quality, biological resources, cultural resources, noise and a jurisdictional delineation. Freedom Telecommunications Project, CEQA Services, Anaheim, Orange County, CA; Gardena, Los Angeles County, CA; and Wrightwood/Cajon, San Bernardino County, CA Associate Environmental Planner. Meghan was responsible for preparing CEQA documentation to support the CPUC permitting form. This project consists of installation of new underground conduit, cable and hand holes/small vaults involving traditional trenching, micro-trenching or directional boring for Freedom telecommunication sites: 32 in the Anaheim, one in the City of Gardena, and five sites within the Wrightwood/Cajon area. CPUC Notice of Proposed Construction forms with supporting documentation of CEQA Exemptions/ Compliance were completed for these sites. 293 1 Mike McEntee Principal-in-Charge | Chief Operating Officer | Executive Vice President, Technical Services Professional Experience Mike McEntee is a biologist with 20 years of environmental consulting experience. He works with clients to document compliance of complex permit requirements and conditions, drafts Biological Assessments and negotiates long-term management agreements for mitigation lands. He specializes in biological surveys and mitigation monitoring for large construction projects and has conducted surveys for least Bell’s vireo, coastal California gnatcatcher, southwestern willow flycatcher, western snowy plover, burrowing owl, arroyo toad, gray fox, Yuma clapper rail, black rail, yellow-billed cuckoo, mountain yellow legged frog, coast range newt, California red legged frog, Santa Ana sucker, bats, macroinvertebrates, and plants. In addition, he has successfully assisted clients in obtaining federal and state permits from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS), the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW), and the Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB). He has worked on projects throughout the western United States and has strong relationships with a broad array of state and federal regulators. Project Experience On-Call Environmental Services, Los Angeles County Sanitation District, Los Angeles County, CA. Program Manager. Mike was responsible for coordinating with Sanitation District project managers, contractors, regulatory agencies, and oversight for CEQA compliance, biological surveys, and mitigation monitoring. Numerous sites located within the District’s 800-square mile service area were included. The District required biological/environmental support to construct, operate and maintain facilities to convey, treat, recycle, and dispose of sewage and industrial wastes and generate recycled water, electrical power, electrical power and biosolids. On-Call Environmental Services, Los Angeles County Department of Public Works (LACDPW), Los Angeles County, CA Principal Biologist. Mike was responsible for coordination with LACDPW and oversight for CEQA compliance, biological surveys, and wetlands delineations, involving numerous sites located in Los Angeles County and the Angeles National Forest. Over 100 task orders have been completed on the on-call contract over the past decade. The surveys and reports were required by the U.S. Forest Service (USFS) to allow Los Angeles County to conduct maintenance and improvement activities. Individual projects have included: Angeles Forest Highway Over Mill Creek, Natural Environment Study (NES) and Biological Assessment; Big Tujunga Wash Master Mitigation Bank Plan, Biological Services; Sierra Highway Widening and Realignment, Biological Services, Jurisdictional Delineation, and Permitting; Cooks Canyon Crib Dam M1-A Debris Basin Dewatering System, Vegetation Surveys; Live Oak Reservoir Cleanout, Environmental Services; EDUCATION BA, Biology, California State University, Fullerton, 1995 TRAINING Southwestern Willow Flycatcher Workshop, Southern Sierra Research Station Marine Corps Certified Range control OIC/RSO BLM Flat-Tailed Horned Lizard Training CERTIFICATIONS California gnatcatcher: authorization to survey, locate and monitor nests, remove brown-headed cowbird eggs and chicks from parasitized nests; USFWS Permit #TE099463-0; Least Bell’s vireo: authorization to locate and monitor nests, remove brown-headed cowbird eggs and chicks from parasitized nests; USFWS Permit #TE099463-0 Southwestern willow flycatcher: authorization to survey, locate and monitor nests, remove brown-headed cowbird eggs and chicks from parasitized nests; USFWS Permit #TE099463-0 AFFILIATIONS Member of the USFWS and USGS least Bell’s vireo, southwestern willow flycatcher, and yellow-billed cuckoo recovery working group 294 2 Spunky Canyon Road Sediment Removal, Biological Services; Avalon Bridge Over Dominguez Channel, Biological Resource Survey and Jurisdictional Delineation; Fitch Avenue Bridge Replacement, Biological and Cultural Services; and Sierra Highway Over Mint Canyon Wash, Biological Survey. Big Tujunga Wash Mitigation Support for the 2017 Fires, Los Angeles County Department of Public Works, Sunland, Los Angeles County, CA. Principal in Change. Mr. McEntee provided program management and helped develop an approach to restore the mitigation bank after the 2017 fires. He oversaw the preparation of a conceptual mitigation plan. The purpose of the plan was to serve as a guide for implementation of the potential enhancement programs after the site burned. The plan discussed strategies for habitat restoration and revegetation, exotic plant eradication, formal trails establishment, exotic wildlife eradication, public outreach, water quality monitoring, and functional analysis. Big Tujunga Wash Master Mitigation Plan (MMP), Los Angeles County Department of Public Works, Sunland, CA Lead Biologist. Mike conducted focused protocol surveys for the southwestern willow flycatcher to determine its presence/absence in approximately 50 hectares (123 acres) of riparian areas in Big Tujunga Wash. He assisted with the preparation of a final MMP. The purpose of the MMP was to serve as a guide for implementation of the various enhancement programs and to fulfill the CDFW requirement for the preparation of a management plan for the site. The MMP discussed strategies for habitat restoration and revegetation, exotic plant eradication, brown-headed cowbird trapping, formal trails establishment, exotic wildlife eradication, public outreach, water quality monitoring, and functional analysis. I-405 Sepulveda Pass Widening Project, Kiewit Pacific, Los Angeles County, CA Project Director. Mike assisted with the design build process to minimize environmental impacts and reduced costs, assisted with the development of the mitigation plan and conducted all negotiations. He coordinated efforts with Kiewit Pacific, CDFW, and California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) for surveys including sensitive plants, vegetation communities, native trees, nesting birds, bats (day and night), and sensitive species constraints mapping in 2009 and 2010 on both sides of the I-405 freeway. Mike developed an Environmental Compliance Monitoring Program, Pre- Construction Bat Surveys in accordance with the CDFW Streambed Alteration Agreement and developed the Contractor Education Brochure for this project. A nesting bird was discovered within the project footprint and the CDFW placed a work stoppage for the remainder of the nesting season. This stoppage would have lasted several months and cost millions of dollars. He and his team worked relentlessly to develop a strategy and coordinate with CDFW to allow construction activities to resume. In cooperation with CDFW, Mike and his team prepared a mitigation plan to avoid impacts to the birds, trained construction crews unceasingly on the plan’s measures, performed requested clearance surveys, and conducted daily monitoring. This joint effort brought the project back on track in two business days. Marblehead Coastal Development Project, SunCal, San Clemente, Orange County, CA Principal Biologist. This 250-acre site is the last large coastal property to be developed along the Orange County coastline. Mike provided environmental consulting services, which included supplying technical assistance needed to acquire a Coastal Development Permit and ensure compliance with all other applicable permits, as well as conduct focused gnatcatcher surveys, construction monitoring, ecological restoration and performance monitoring for five years. He ensured compliance with all conditions of the Habitat Management Plan (HMP) during initial vegetation clearing/grubbing, erosion control and project construction phases. Restoration efforts included enhancement of native grasslands and coastal bluff scrub. The HMP was designed to maximize the habitat value for coastal California gnatcatcher and other species dependent on sage scrub as well as to enhance the functional value of the preserved/restored wetlands within the canyons by improving connectivity and allowing for wildlife movement between each area. 295 1 Corinne Lytle Bonine, PMP Environmental Planning | Senior Technical Advisor | Managing Environmental Planner Professional Experience Corinne Lytle Bonine is the Managing Environmental Planner at Chambers Group, as well as a Senior Project Manager with over 12 years of experience. She has managed an array of CEQA and NEPA projects in addition to having led the preparation of the following NEPA and CEQA compliant documents: Environmental Impact Statements, Environmental Impact Reports, Applications for Certification to the California Energy Commission, Environmental Assessments, and Initial Studies / Mitigated Negative Declarations. Both an accomplished team leader and field agent, Corinne has served as the visual resources and land use specialist on more than 75 projects. Her permitting projects include but are not limited to Endangered Species Act Sections 7 and 10 consultations, USACE Individual Permits, and Section 106 consultations. She has managed environmental constraints analyses, fatal flaw analyses and technical reports. Her experience includes supervisory roles in general environmental projects, large-scale environmental compliance projects, as well as in visual resources and land use impact analysis. Project Experience City of Chino Hills, The Rincon Development (formerly Golden Triangle Development Project) Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration, Chino Hills, CA Managing Environmental Planner. Corinne provided principal-level oversight and review in the development of an IS/MND consistent with CEQA. The CEQA document also included technical analysis for air quality, greenhouse gas emissions, cultural resources, noise, and traffic. Chino Hills Golden Triangle LLC proposed to develop a 10.42-acre parcel located in the City of Chino Hills at the southwest corner of the Soquel Canyon Parkway off-ramp and State Route 71 (SR 71) as a 157,100-square-foot mixed commercial center. Since the approval of the IS/MND, the developer has revised the site plan and Eunice is assisting with a Subsequent MND to analyze the changes to the original Project. Quasi-Industrial Floor Area Ratio (FAR) General Plan Amendment, City of San Juan Capistrano, San Juan Capistrano, Orange County, CA Managing Environmental Planner. Services provided included providing environmental planning services for the analysis of the City’s proposed General Plan Amendment to increase FAR in the Quasi-Industrial land use designation. Corinne supported the project efforts through reviewing the Draft IS/ND for the City and supported the project as it moved through its public review period. The project and accompanying CEQA document were approved by City Council on February 6, 2018. 9001 E. Whittier Boulevard Development IS/MND, Pico Rivera, CA Project Manager. The proposed project is located at 9001 Whittier Boulevard. The parcel contains a 12,126-square-foot drive-thru building, currently occupied by Bank of EDUCATION BA, Environmental Studies, UC Santa Barbara, 2007, (with honors) CERTIFICATIONS Project Management Professional, #2005796 AFFILIATIONS Technical Advisory Committee, San Diego County Comprehensive Renewable Energy plan, 2014 – present Honorable Mention - San Diego Business Journal 2013 Emerging Generation: 25 in their 20’s, 2013 Outstanding Performance and Excellence, Junior Professional, 2009 Association of Environmental Professionals, San Diego Chapter President, 2014 – present Association of Environmental Professionals, San Diego Chapter Vice President of Programs, 2012 – 2013 Association of Environmental Professionals Annual Awards Event Committee Chair, 2010 - 2012 Technical Advisory Committee for County of San Diego's Comprehensive Renewable Energy Plan Women of Wind Energy 296 2 the West. Dynamic Development intends to purchase the property and demolish the existing building and construct a new drive-thru for Chick-fil-A and a new retail building, which will house Bank of the West and one other retail tenant, yet to be determined. The proposed project is located within the City of Pico Rivera, California and represents infill development. Chambers Group managed the preparation of an IS/MND and associated technical studies including parking analysis and a traffic impact study. In order to meet purchase requirements, Chambers Group delivered on a project schedule that necessitated certification at a Planning Commission meeting on November 21, 2016, after receiving notice to proceed on September 12, 2016. City of Beaumont On Call for Environmental Services, Task Order Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Peer Review, Beaumont, CA Project Manager. Chambers Group was selected to provide on-call environmental services to the City of Beaumont. Services include peer review of previously prepared IS/MND for various City projects. Eunice assisted in peer review of the environmental documents focusing on technical sections such as Aesthetics, Agricultural Resources, Geology/Soils, Hazardous Materials, Hydrology, Land Use, Mineral Resources, Public Services, Recreation, and Utilities/Service Systems. City of Beaumont On Call for Environmental Services, Task Order Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration for Commercial Center, Beaumont, CA Project Manager. The team evaluated the permit application for compliance with the City’s General and Specific Plan and conducting peer review of the applicant-prepared IS/MND to evaluate impacts associated with the project and ensure compliance with CEQA. The proposed commercial shopping center consisting of approximately 37,800 square feet of shopping center, a 4,300-square foot bread/donut/bagel shop, a 4,370-square foot car wash, and an 8-service bay tire store. The proposed project site covers a total of 7.07 acres. The remaining area of the project site would consist of 56,991 square feet of landscaping and 188,947 square feet of roads and walkways. City of Beaumont On Call for Environmental Services, Task Order Oakridge RV Storage, Beaumont, CA Project Manager. The proposed project would develop a recreational vehicle storage facility on a 2.67 acre parcel in the City of Beaumont east of Maple Avenue and north for First Street. The project site is located on a privately owned, undeveloped property in the City of Beaumont. Chambers Group evaluated the Cultural Resources Report, Biological Survey Report, Draft Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration, and Air Quality and Noise analyses. City of Beaumont On Call for Environmental Services, Task Order Beaumont Brookside, Beaumont, CA Project Manager. The proposed project consists of drafting an Initial Study for an existing RV storage facility in the City of Beaumont. The existing RV storage facility, located on a 24.77 acre-site, was constructed prior to the annexation of the project area and was not issued a Conditional Use Permit. Chambers Group reviewed the Initial Study supporting the adoption of an MND and technical studies such as a Trip Generation Analysis, Biological Resources Study, Cultural- Archaeological Study, and Air Quality, Greenhouse Gas, and Noise models. 297 1 Thomas Strand Environmental Planning | Project Manager Professional Experience Thomas Strand is an Environmental Planner with Chambers with four years of experience involving California Environmental Quality Act and the National Environmental Policy Act. Thomas’ experience involves large- and small-scale project management on CEQA documents and primary author on a number of CEQA and NEPA documents. Thomas has prepared numerous Environmental Impact Reports (EIRs), Initial Studies (ISs), Mitigated Negative Declarations (MNDs), and Environmental Impact Statements (EISs) for both public and private clients. Additionally, his experience includes watershed modeling, technical report writing, environmental assessment and monitoring, and permitting. Project Experience Quikrete Plant, Initial Study Addendum City of Palmdale, CA Environmental Planner. The proposed project is located in a vacant lot in the City of Palmdale with a land use designation of Industrial. A previous Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) and Conditional Use Permit were prepared for the project site to be developed as a bagging facility in 2002 and 2009, respectively. Due to project use changes, the Client prepared an updated entitlement application for the use of 14 of the 20-acres of the project site and construct a paver plant facility instead of the previously proposed bagging facility. Chambers Group completed the requested entitlement application for the proposed project, conducted a site visit with the Client, prepared an addendum summary to the previous MND, and reviewed and incorporated the results from the following technical studies into the addendum: Air Quality, Cultural Resources Study, Biological Resources Report, Phase I Environmental Assessment, Acoustical Report, and Geotechnical Engineering Report. The proposed project and entitlement application were approved by the City’s Planning Commission Staff. Environmental Impact Report, South Glendale Community Plan, City of Glendale, Glendale, CA Environmental Planner. Responsible for managing the environmental document and authoring the biological resources, hydrology and water quality, population and housing, noise, air quality, and greenhouse gas sections of the environmental impact report. Also, modeled air quality and greenhouse gas impacts and prepared the air quality report, the health risk assessment, greenhouse gas report, and noise report. This project involves the preparation of a South Glendale Community Plan. Oakridge RV Storage, City of Beaumont, CA Environmental Planner. Peer Review. The Proposed Project would develop a recreational vehicle storage facility on a 2.67-acre parcel in the City of Beaumont east of Maple Avenue and north for First Street. The project site is located on a privately owned, undeveloped property in the City of Beaumont. Chambers Group evaluated the Cultural Resources Report, Biological Survey Report, Draft Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration, and Air Quality and Noise analyses. EDUCATION MS, Watershed Science, San Diego State University, 2016 BA, Geography, San Diego State University, 2014 HONORS AND AWARDS Cum Laude Graduate, San Diego State University, 2015/2016 Lead Teaching Associate, San Diego State University, Geography Department, 2015/2016 Outstanding Citizen, San Diego State University, Geography Department, 2015/2016 Ned H. Greenwood Award, San Diego State University, 2014/2015 Outstanding Graduating Senior, Geography Department, San Diego State University, 2014 AFFILIATIONS Association of Environmental Professionals, Vice President of Membership 298 2 Subsequent Environmental Impact Report, San Diego County General Plan Update, Property Specific Requests, County of San Diego, San Diego, CA Environmental Planner. Responsible for managing the environmental document and authoring the hydrology and water quality, population and housing, public services, recreation, and utilities and service systems sections of the document. The County of San Diego proposes to revise the adopted general plan land use map by redistricting and rezoning 43 Property Specific Requests consisting of private properties and surrounding study areas. The Proposed Project also includes the annexation of the former Champagne Gardens Specific Plan Area into the Surrounding Community Planning Areas. Program Environmental Impact Report, City of Huntington Beach General Plan Update, Huntington Beach, CA Environmental Planner. Responsible for the development of the Technical Background Reports and management of the Quality Control process for the General Plan Update EIR. Additionally, authored the transportation and traffic, hydrology and water quality, population and housing, air quality, and greenhouse gas emissions section of the PEIR. The project prescribed overall development capacity for the City of Huntington Beach and serves as a policy guide for determining the appropriate physical development and character of Huntington Beach over an approximate 25-year planning horizon (to 2040). Environmental Assessment/Mitigated Negative Declaration, San Pasqual Undergrounding Project, Valley Center, CA Environmental Planner. Responsible for authoring the Land Use, Hazards and Hazardous Materials, Socioeconomic, and Cumulative Impact Sections of the joint environmental assessment (EA)/mitigated negative declaration (MND) document. The project involved the undergrounding of the Escondido Canal in portions of Tribal and County of San Diego lands. The project is a result of the San Luis Rey Settlement Agreement. Also assisted is rare species surveys and least Bell’s vireo surveys. Mitigated Negative Declaration, Goodyear Blimp Site Improvements Project, City of Carson, Carson, CA Project Manager. The project includes an expansion of the mooring area at the Carson, California property in order to accommodate a larger blimp. The property is located on a decommissioned landfill and required coordination with the FAA and DTSC. Tasks undertaken include: project manager, coordinate/attend client and applicant meeting, agency coordination, facilitate CEQA studies, forms, and develop the initial study. Project adopted April 2017. Environmental Impact Report, South Glendale Community Plan, City of Glendale, Glendale, CA Environmental Planner. Responsible for managing the environmental document and authoring the biological resources, hydrology and water quality, population and housing, noise, air quality, and greenhouse gas sections of the environmental impact report. Also, modeled air quality and greenhouse gas impacts and prepared the air quality report, the health risk assessment, greenhouse gas report, and noise report. This project involves the preparation of a South Glendale Community Plan. 299 1 Eunice Bagwan Environmental Planning | Assistant Environmental Planner Professional Experience Eunice has a background in CEQA and NEPA environmental impact assessments as well as technical writing and editing. She has assisted with the preparation, writing, and editing environmental documents, such as IS/MNDs, Categorical Exemptions, EIRs and safety related documents such as job hazard safety forms and safety plans. Eunice has managed and co-managed various projects as a Deputy Project Manager and Project Manager. Project Experience The Rincon Development Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (Formerly Golden Triangle), City of Chino Hills, CA Environmental Planner. Eunice assisted in the development and approval of an IS/MND consistent with CEQA. Chino Hills Golden Triangle LLC proposes to develop a 10.42-acre parcel located in the City of Chino Hills at the southwest corner of the Soquel Canyon Parkway off-ramp and State Route 71 (SR 71) as a 157,100-square-foot mixed commercial center. Since the approval of the IS/MND, the developer has revised the site plan and Eunice is assisting with a Subsequent MND to analyze the changes to the original Project. Monroe Storm Drain, Stage 4 Project, Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration, Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District, Riverside County, CA Assistant Environmental Planner. The proposed project is to remove the preexisting storm drain and install an upgraded and enclosed channel to improve the performance during floods and decrease maintenance costs. Eunice was involved in proofreading/screen checks on the drafted IS/MND. Additional staffing assistance included drafting the Notice of Intent and filling out needed documentation to be submitted to the State Clearinghouse. City of Beaumont On Call for Environmental Services, Task Order Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Peer Review, Beaumont, CA Assistant Planner. Eunice assisted in peer review of the environmental documents focusing on technical sections such as Aesthetics, Agricultural Resources, Geology/Soils, Hazardous Materials, Hydrology, Land Use, Mineral Resources, Public Services, Recreation, and Utilities/Service Systems. City of Beaumont On Call for Environmental Services, Task Order Hidden Canyon Industrial Park Plot Plan, Beaumont, CA Assistant Planner. Eunice supported the City for the Hidden Canyon Industrial Park Plot Plan. The Project proposed to construct a 2.89 million square foot warehouse project in two buildings. Amendments to the plan were processed in 2005 and 2012 utilizing EDUCATION MS, Environmental Management and Planning, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 2015 BS, Environmental and Occupational Health and Safety, California State University, Northridge, CA 2011 TRAINING NEPA Basics – Fundamentals:2015 EPA New Rule Defining Waters of the U.S. USACE:2015 CEQA Essentials: 2015 SCE’s EDGE Program Safety First Workshop 2016 AFFILIATIONS Association of Environmental Professionals: Member-at- Large Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Conservation Steward: North Etiwanda Preserve University of Redlands Student Liaison. 300 2 addendums to the EIR. The City proposed to approve an update to the project plot plan, however, delays were met due to responses from LIUNA that the project required a new CEQA review due to plot changes from the original project. Chambers Group provided the City guidance by identifying CEQA guidelines that applied to the project on identifying whether a new CEQA process was required. City of Beaumont On Call for Environmental Services, Task Order Initial Study/Mitigated Negative for Commercial Center, Beaumont, CA Assistant Planner. Eunice evaluated the permit application for compliance with the City’s General and Specific Plan and conducting peer review of the applicant-prepared IS/MND to evaluate impacts associated with the project and ensure compliance with CEQA. The proposed commercial shopping center consisting of approximately 37,800 square feet of shopping center, a 4,300-square foot bread/donut/bagel shop, a 4,370-square foot car wash, and an 8-service bay tire store. The proposed project site covers a total of 7.07 acres. The remaining area of the project site would consist of 56,991 square feet of landscaping and 188,947 square feet of roads and walkways. City of Beaumont On Call for Environmental Services, Task Order Oakridge RV Storage, Beaumont, CA Environmental Planner. The proposed project would develop a recreational vehicle storage facility on a 2.67 acre parcel in the City of Beaumont east of Maple Avenue and north for First Street. The project site is located on a privately owned, undeveloped property in the City of Beaumont. Chambers Group evaluated the Cultural Resources Report, Biological Survey Report, Draft Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration, and Air Quality and Noise analyses. City of Beaumont On Call for Environmental Services, Task Order Beaumont Brookside, Beaumont, CA Environmental Planner. The proposed project consists of drafting an Initial Study for an existing RV storage facility in the City of Beaumont. The existing RV storage facility, located on a 24.77 acre-site, was constructed prior to the annexation of the project area and was not issued a Conditional Use Permit. Chambers Group reviewed the Initial Study supporting the adoption of an MND and technical studies such as a Trip Generation Analysis, Biological Resources Study, Cultural-Archaeological Study, and Air Quality, Greenhouse Gas, and Noise models. City of Beaumont, Hidden Canyon Industrial Park Plot Plan, Beaumont, CA Assistant Planner. Eunice supported the City for the Hidden Canyon Industrial Park Plot Plan. The Project proposed to construct a 2.89 million square foot warehouse project in two buildings. Amendments to the plan were processed in 2005 and 2012 utilizing addendums to the EIR. The City proposed to approve an update to the project plot plan, however, delays were met due to responses from LIUNA that the project required a new CEQA review due to plot changes from the original project. Chambers Group provided the City guidance by identifying CEQA guidelines that applied to the project on identifying whether a new CEQA process was required. 301 1 Paul Morrissey Biology | Director of Biology Professional Experience Paul Morrissey has more than 15 years of experience participating in and conducting terrestrial and aquatic/marine studies, with a comprehensive background in both collecting data and performing biological monitoring surveys. He is an experienced biologist, field manager, and project manager. He has managed several On-Call contracts for City and Counties, accounting for hundreds of successful projects. He has coordinated with state and federal agencies to develop and implement effective mitigation and monitoring plans for listed and sensitive species and to ensure compliance with state and federal laws. Working on and managing complex linear projects such as the utility and fiber optic projects has made him familiar with the flora and wildlife species within San Bernardino, Riverside, Los Angeles, San Diego, and Imperial counties. He has conducted wetlands delineations pursuant to Section 404 of the CWA and riparian delineations pursuant to Section 1601/1603 of the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) Code. He has also prepared jurisdictional delineation reports and prepared permit applications for the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), CDFW, and Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB). He has performed agency consultations, prepared CDFW and Bureau of Land Management (BLM)/United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) permits for state and federal- listed species, and developed habitat mitigation monitoring plans and restoration plans for associated impacts. He has negotiated reasonable mitigation ratios with the agencies based on existing habitat quality. He has authored technical biological sections of PEAs and has negotiated mitigation measures with the CPUC to receive authorization of construction for utility tie line projects. Paul has assisted in the designs of several projects to identify and minimize potential impacts. In fact, Paul earned Chambers Group the Marvin M. Black Award for partnering by the Associated Contractors of America for a stilling pool design and implementation which allowed the award-winning project to move forward. Project Experience Preparation and Implementation of the Master Mitigation Plan (MMP) for the Big Tujunga Wash Mitigation Bank Site, Los Angeles County Department of Public Works, CA Program Manager. The Big Tujunga Wash Mitigation Area (BTWMA) is owned and managed by LACDPW to offset impacts to habitats and vegetation communities at other LACDPW-owned facilities. Chambers Group prepared the original MMP for the Mitigation Bank in 1999 and conducted functional analysis surveys and exotic species removal. Mr. Morrissey manages the restoration and preservation of more than 200 acres of upland and riparian scrub habitat. Mr. Morrissey also manages the annual brown-headed cowbird trapping program and exotic species removal. The exotic plant eradication and maintenance crew applies herbicide and hand-removes exotic plant species (e.g., giant reed, tamarisk, castor bean, tocalote, and numerous other weedy species) on a quarterly basis in which each maintenance event takes place during the spring and early summer months. He coordinates the exotic wildlife removal in the creek EDUCATION MS, Biology, California State University, Dominguez Hills, 2005 BS, Biology, California State University, Dominguez Hills, 2001 CERTIFICATIONS USFWS Permit, #TE182550-1, CDFW Scientific Collector’s Permit, #SC-008151 USACE, Wetland Training Institute, Wetland Delineator Certification Desert Tortoise Surveying Techniques Workshop, Desert Tortoise Council, qualified desert tortoise biologist CDFW authorized to take, possess, and transport flat- tailed horned lizards, 2007 Marvin M. Black Excellence in Partnering Award for the San Gabriel River Project Southwestern Willow Flycatcher Workshop, Southern Sierra Research Station; Basic Tracking, Earth Skills Electrofishing and Fish Handling Techniques 302 2 and associated Tujunga ponds to enhance habitat for the federally listed Santa Ana sucker. In addition, he coordinates the water quality monitoring, trails monitoring and maintenance, and the public outreach program. The outreach program consists of multiple site visits conducted by two bilingual biologists on peak use weekends in the spring and summer to educate the various user groups about the prohibited activities on the mitigation area. He also assists LACDPW with public affairs for the BTWMA, with LACDPW email access to respond to inquiries made by local residents and constituents for any information regarding the BTWMA. He provides the public with information for on-going maintenance activities in the BTWMA and notifications for upcoming work and events related to the BTWMA. In late November 2017, the Creek Fire burned 100 percent of the mitigation area, along with portions of riparian and upland habitat that had been signed off by the agencies as off-site mitigation credit for LACDPW projects. Mr. Morrissey is negotiating with CDFW, USACE, RWQCB, and USFWS to allow LACDPW to quickly reestablish and enhance riparian and upland habitat in areas that were previously mitigated for other projects, as well as create new and more diverse habitat in the mitigation area. The BTWMA is a large-scale project that requires attention to detail and careful scheduling. It is a special site to the residents in Sunland and the surrounding communities and Chambers Group is proud to play a role in improving the site both for native plants and wildlife as well as the general public. On-Call Biological Surveys and Monitoring for the 2015 to 2018 for 172 Debris Basins Maintenance Project, Los Angeles County, CA Program Manager. Paul coordinated pre- and post-construction surveys and biological monitoring within 172 debris basins maintained annually by Flood Maintenance Division (FMD) throughout Los Angeles County, California. The surveys are required by the agency permits (401/404/1602) obtained by LACFCD for maintenance activities including mowing/trimming of vegetation and potential sediment removal within the debris basins. Surveys included jurisdictional and wetland delineations, pre- and post-construction surveys, water quality sampling and analysis, and biological compliance monitoring. Annual reports are prepared and submitted to RWQCB. Interstate 405 Sepulveda Pass Widening Design-Build Project, Survey Liaison, Jurisdictional Delineation Assistance, Environmental Compliance Monitoring, HMMP, Capture and Relocation Plan Development, Metropolitan Transit Authority, Los Angeles, Los Angeles County, CA Project Manager. The Project covers approximately 10 miles along Interstate 405 (I-405), from National Boulevard to the US 101 in Los Angeles, California. Paul coordinated efforts with Kiewit Infrastructure West Co. (Kiewit), CDFW, Metro and Caltrans for surveys including sensitive plants, vegetation communities, native trees, nesting birds, bats (day and night), and sensitive species constraints mapping in 2009 and 2010 on both sides of the I-405 freeway. He assisted Kiewit with a formal Jurisdictional Delineation of the project site in support of Sections 401, 402, and 404 of the Clean Water Act (CWA) and Division 2, Chapter 6, Sections 1600-1602 of the California Fish and Game Code. Paul developed and coordinated the Environmental Compliance Monitoring throughout the year for multiple construction crews (day and night shifts), Pre-Construction Surveys in accordance with the CDFW Streambed Alteration Agreement, and developed the Contractor Education Brochure for this project. He coordinated with the Agencies and developed a Habitat Mitigation/Monitoring Plan (HMMP) in an effort to lift the stop work ordered by CDFW. Paul developed and submitted a white-throated swift capture and relocation plan to the Agencies, Kiewit, Caltrans and Metro. He and staff successfully captured and relocated seven swifts from the bridge area. Five swifts were nestlings and were taken to the South Bay Wildlife Rescue where they were raised in captivity and successfully released in August 2011. Paul also provided agency negotiations for additional impacts not covered under the current permits. 303 1 Heather Clayton Biology | Senior Biologist/Ecologist, Project Manager Professional Experience Heather Clayton has 15 years of experience and serves as project manager and lead botanist/restoration ecologist on numerous habitat restoration and monitoring projects. She is responsive to stringent deadlines and works with her field team to see that tasks are handled efficiently and effectively at each project site. As a certified field botanist through the California Native Plant Society, and experienced in conducting focused plant surveys throughout California, Heather is an excellent asset to any project involving rare plant species. She can tailor an in-depth habitat mitigation and monitoring plan for a variety of habitats in southern California and has been instrumental in implementing and monitoring the restoration effort for sites with unproductive/problematic soils, for sites in environmentally sensitive areas with rare plant species and for sites overrun with invasive weeds. She recognizes the early signs of site decline and knows what remedial actions to take before problems escalate. She communicates effectively with landscape contractors and agencies and is incredibly adept at maintaining budgets. Project Experience Hidden Hills Reservoir Construction Project, Biological Monitoring, Yorba Linda Water District, Yorba Linda, Orange County, CA Project Manager, Staff Biologist, Senior Restoration Ecologist. Heather conducted biological monitoring during reservoir construction and provided recommendations to the contractor to maintain stormwater pollution prevention measures and erosion control. Heather also helped prepare the Habitat Mitigation and Monitoring Plan for the reservoir site following construction. The reservoir site borders the Chino Hills State Park which guided the selection of plant species local to the area and crucial to providing wildlife habitat. Her continued annual mitigation monitoring for the past 7 years as well as agency coordination helped the Water District fulfill their mitigation requirements. Sea Summit at Marblehead Coastal Development and Outlets Center, Marblehead Development Partners/Taylor Morrison, San Clemente, Orange County, CA Senior Botanist, Restoration Ecologist, Project Manager. Heather conducted vegetation sampling and rare plant surveys onsite and within reference populations to determine appropriate species composition and planting densities for the Habitat Mitigation Plan. She provided restoration tasks, including plant and seed acquisition, nursery and resource agency coordination, annual performance monitoring within coastal sage scrub and riparian habitats (for nearly 10 years), coastal California gnatcatcher monitoring, and general oversight of the 100-acre preserve to ensure the success criteria could be achieved. Her close communication with the California Coastal Commission and the California Department of Fish and Wildlife as well as the Center for Natural Lands Management has kept construction progressing smoothly within this Environmentally Sensitive Habitat area. EDUCATION MS, Biology, California State University, Fullerton, 2003 BA, Biology, Environmental Emphasis, Occidental College, Los Angeles, CA, 1999 TRAINING California Native Plant Society Vegetation Rapid Assessment Protocol for Vegetation Sampling Workshop CERTIFICATIONS California Native Plant Society Certified Field Botanist CFB-0012. Expiration 2021 Plant Voucher Collecting Permit to Collect Voucher Specimens of State-Listed Endangered, Threatened and Rare Plants. No. 2081(a) 16 129 V. CDFW Scientific Collection Permit No. SC-009907. California Native Plant Society Member Southern California Botanists Member California Society for Ecological Restoration Member AREAS OF EXPERTISE Botanical Surveys Vegetation Mapping Habitat Restoration Compliance Monitoring Endangered Plant Species 304 2 Kerrigan Ranch Development Site, Biological Resources Surveys and Habitat Restoration, Pulte Group, Yorba Linda/Chino Hills, Orange County, Riverside County, San Bernardino County, CA Project Manager, Senior Botanist. Heather conducted extensive biological resources surveys to document the biological conditions on several large (260 acres) restoration sites on behalf of this private developer. She designed mitigation programs, both on site and off site, for coastal sage scrub and riparian habitats. Heather located suitable mitigation areas and made necessary arrangements with California State Parks, securing all the necessary permits to work in Chino Hills State Park. She also mapped invasive giant reed in an offsite mitigation area and monitored progress for 5 years. She performed maintenance and annual performance monitoring for a 2.1-acre riparian site and coordinated with the landscape contractor to ensure required performance standards could be met. Currently, she is overseeing restoration efforts on a 22-acre coastal sage scrub site in Chino Hills State Park and working closely with the agencies and the landscape contractor to ensure success. Chevron Lucerne Valley Solar Project, Focused Survey and Report, Chevron Energy Solutions, Lucerne, San Bernardino County, CA Staff Biologist/Field Manager. Heather conducted a focused survey for sensitive plants on a 516-acre site proposed by Chevron for solar panel installation. She walked transects in order to cover 100 percent of the project site. Heather organized teams during the survey and served as the lead contact for communication with the resource agencies. She also prepared a report documenting findings of the survey. Big Tujunga Dam and Reservoir Cleanout Project, Phase II, Monitoring, County of Los Angeles Public Works, Sunland, CA Field Manager, Staff Botanist. Heather monitored the revegetation enhancement of upland and riparian habitat in the 200-acre mitigation bank for LACDPW. The revegetation components of the master plan included the restoration of existing riparian habitat by removing exotic plant species and revegetating with native plant species. The plan provided for creation of coastal sage scrub and oak woodland habitats, and programs were designed to reduce the impact of exotic wildlife species on the native communities. A comprehensive monitoring program was developed for the site in which data were collected for a complete functional analysis, based on the USACE Hydrogeomorphic Analysis and Habitat Evaluation Procedures. She submitted a report summarizing the survey results after each inspection or combined with larger annual reports. I-405 Sepulveda Pass Widening, Sensitive Plant Surveys, Kiewit Pacific, Los Angeles County, CA Staff Biologist. Heather performed sensitive plant surveys to determine the presence or absence of Braunton’s milk- vetch, Davidson’s bush mallow, and mesa horkelia throughout the project corridor; mapped vegetation communities, including the major noxious weed populations; and conducted a tree survey in which all native trees were identified and mapped and diameter at breast height (dbh) was recorded for each individual. Surveys were conducted in 2009 and 2010 on both sides of I-405. She worked with California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) biologists and planners to develop a Revegetation Mitigation and Monitoring Plan for the project in accordance with the Streambed Alteration Agreement and NES. Heather performed a series of point-intercept line transects through intact native habitats within the vicinity of the project site to determine vegetative cover and species composition of undisturbed reference populations similar to those habitats on site. These data were used to develop the planting palette and performance standards for the restoration effort following construction. 305 1 Heather Franklin Biology | Staff Biologist Professional Experience Heather Franklin’s diverse background in wildlife biology includes nine years of experience in a variety of habitats including coastal sage scrub, desert, marine, and riparian. She has followed survey protocols to perform vegetation and wildlife inventories and functional analysis surveys. She is knowledgeable in field identification of avian species, small mammals, and fish. Her strengths include conducting regulatory compliance, reconnaissance-level biological surveys, preconstruction surveys, and construction mitigation monitoring for federal- and state-listed species and California special-concern species (e.g., coast range newt, burrowing owl, Mohave ground squirrel). Project Experience Debris Basin Monitoring Project, Pre- and Post-Construction Surveys, Biological Monitoring, and Water Quality Sampling, Los Angeles County Flood Control District (LACFCD) Flood Maintenance Division (FMD), Los Angeles County, CA Project Biologist/Project Manager. Ms. Franklin managed a $246,000 contract for pre- and post-construction surveys, nesting bird surveys, biological monitoring, and as needed water quality sampling for 172 debris basins maintained by the LACFCD FMD throughout portions of Los Angeles County, California. The surveys and monitoring were required under permits from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and Regional Water Quality Control Board for maintenance activities including mowing/trimming of vegetation and potential sediment removal within the debris basins. Ms. Franklin oversee permit compliance, conducts field surveys and water quality testing, as well as supported all technical efforts and field activities by coordinating and developing maintenance schedules for various debris basins and provided logistical support to staff in the field. Ms. Franklin also manages and provides oversight for the preparation of pre- and post-maintenance summary reports and oversaw aspects of project and contract management including budget management, scheduling, quality control, and coordination of internal field staff. Sea Summit at Marblehead Coastal Development and Outlets Center, Marblehead Development Partners/Taylor Morrison, San Clemente, Orange County, CA Project Biologist. Ms. Franklin managed and conducted habitat assessments, nesting bird surveys, and focused presence/absence for California gnatcatcher and burrowing owl over approximately 31 acres of coastal bluff habitat. EDUCATION MS, Biology, California State University, Fullerton, 2010 BS, Wildlife Biology Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, 2006 TRAINING San Diego Sensitive Butterflies Workshop, December 8, 2012 Biology and Management of the California Red-Legged Frog Workshop, April 25-26, 2012 Sea and Sage Audubon Introduction to Birding by Sound Workshop, January- February, 2012 Desert Tortoise Introduction to Surveying, Monitoring, and Handling Techniques Workshop, November 4-6, 2011 Sea and Sage Audubon Introduction to Southern California Birds Workshop, November –December, 2011 306 2 I-405 Sepulveda Pass Widening Project, Metropolitan Transportation Authority – Sub to Kiewit Pacific, Los Angeles, Los Angeles County, CA. Staff Biologist. Ms. Franklin performed preconstruction nesting bird surveys and monitored nesting birds during construction activities to verify compliance with the Migratory Bird Treaty Act. The right-of-way (ROW) for this project is approximately 10 miles long and 200 to 500 feet wide. San Francisquito Bridge Replacement, County of Los Angeles Department of Public Works, Santa Clarita & Los Angeles, Los Angeles County, CA. Associate Biologist. Ms. Franklin conducted sensitive reptile and amphibian species surveys (including California red- legged frog), and sensitive bat nocturnal surveys. Ms. Franklin successfully located a population of California red-legged frogs and conducted both breeding season and winter surveys, observing over 20 individual adults. In addition, she 20262, 20263, 20399 prepared a Natural Environment Study (NES) and Biological Assessment and Biological Evaluation (BA/BE) for this project, including identification of appropriate mitigation measures, where applicable. Chambers Group prepared the Joint NEPA/CEQA document for the bridge replacement at San Francisquito Canyon Creek Bridges 53C- 518, 53C-0519 and 53C-0517 for LACDPW. Jurisdictional Delineations for 14 Debris Basins, Los Angeles County Flood Control District (LACFCD) Flood Maintenance Division (FMD), Los Angeles County, California Staff Biologist/Project Manager. Ms. Franklin conducted jurisdictional/wetland delineations for 14 debris basins located throughout Los Angeles County and authored a Jurisdictional Delineation Report for permit applications. Fort Irwin Environmental Assessment, Surveys, Forkert Engineering & Surveying, Fort Irwin, San Bernardino County, CA. Staff Biologist. Ms. Franklin conducted protocol presence/absence surveys for desert tortoise, focused surveys for sensitive plants and burrowing owl, and general wildlife surveys within over a dozen sites proposed sites for cell tower construction. Surveys were performed within the right-of-way and 50-meter buffer of each site and associated access road. Ms. Franklin located and documented possible desert tortoise and burrowing owl sign including burrow sites and scat, as well as sensitive plant locations. AT&T Fiber-Optic Cable Installation Project from Slash X Ranch to Halloran Summit Road, AT&T, San Bernardino County, CA. Associate Biologist. Ms. Franklin conducted 130 hours of targeted protocol level desert tortoise surveys along an 80- mile span of the Mojave Desert for pre-construction surveys for the placement of a digital fiber optic line. She conducted protocol burrowing owl. Ms. Franklin positively observed four live free adults, over 20 active burrows, all stages of scat, and desert tortoise remains. South Orange County Reliability Enhancement, Orange and San Diego Counties, San Diego Gas & Electric (SDG&E), San Diego, CA. Staff Biologist. As a permitted biologist, Ms. Franklin performed protocol-level focused surveys for the coastal California gnatcatcher and least Bell’s vireo under the SDG&E NCCP. The project spanned approximately 10 miles for the installation of additional power lines. Ms. Franklin documented locations of coastal California gnatcatcher and least Bell’s vireo during the surveys and prepared a report of findings. 307 1 Lisa Louie Marine Biology | Senior Marine Biologist, Regulatory Permitting Specialist, Project Manager Professional Experience Lisa Louie is a Senior Project Manager with more than 19 years of experience in marine, estuarine, and freshwater environmental management. She has prepared or supported in the preparation of multiple NEPA and CEQA documents. Her experience includes both NEPA and CEQA documents: environmental impact statements and reports (EIS/EIR), environmental assessments (EA), initial studies (IS), and negative declarations (ND), Categorical Exemptions and Exclusions (CatEx) as well as integrated NEPA/CEQA documents. Lisa also has coordinated with state and federal resource agencies, including the successful negotiation of mitigation and conservation requirements. In addition, Lisa has coordinated and managed mitigation and monitoring plans as well as permit applications that include Clean Water Act (CWA) Section 404 (individual and nationwide) permits and 404(b)(1) evaluations for United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), CWA Section 401 water quality certifications for the Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB), Section 1600 streambed alteration agreement applications for the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW), coastal development permits and consistency determinations for the California Coastal Commission (CCC), and essential fish habitat (EFH) for the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration National Marine Fisheries Service (NOAA Fisheries). Project Experience Countywide Reconnaissance-Level Habitat Surveys for the 7-year Infrastructure Capital Improvement Plan Mitigation Program, OCPW, Orange County, CA Senior Project Manager/Biologist/Permitting Specialist. Chambers Group conducted reconnaissance level habitat surveys throughout Orange County at proposed capital improvement plan (CIP) project sites to provide preliminary data of potential habitat areas that may require mitigation. Lisa and Heather Clayton led the effort and coordinated with the County Project Manager in several meetings. Prior to going into the field, GIS information provided by the County were included on maps of each of the project locations. Chambers Group biologists conducted reconnaissance-level field surveys to qualitatively identify habitat present at each of the CIP projects, including taking representative photographs of any habitat present that may require mitigation if impacted by the future projects. We provided a matrix documenting countywide surveys. Project types included Transportation, Flood Control, Bikeway. The matrix included vegetation community types present, number of oak trees (if present), dominant plant species present for sensitive habitats, total linear feet of each sensitive habitat type, and other pertinent observations/notes as part of the initial review for the Mitigation Program for the CIP projects. Native habitats included mule fat scrub, black willow woodland, coastal sage scrub, coast live oak scrub, chaparral, southern willow scrub, riparian herbaceous, saltgrass patch, cattail series, bulrush series, annual grassland, and transitional Riversidian alluvial fan sage scrub/coastal sage scrub. EDUCATION MS, Marine Science, University of San Diego, 2005 BS, General Biology, University of California, San Diego, 1999 TRAINING California Rapid Assessment Method (CRAM) – Southern California Research Project (May 2009) Wetland Delineation – Wetland Training Institute (August 2007) Wetland Riverine Functional Assessment/Ecology for Project Managers – USACE Environmental Considerations in Planning – USACE Hydrologic & Hydraulic Considerations in Planning – USACE Planning (Principles and Procedures) Workshop – USACE Environmental Impact Assessment – USACE Public Involvement and Teaming in Planning – USACE Planning (Civil Works) Orientation Workshop – USACE Introduction to Planning – USACE Plan Formulation Workshop – USACE 308 2 I-405 Sepulveda Pass Widening, Permit Compliance, Kiewit, Los Angeles County, CA Regulatory Permitting Specialist. Lisa prepared the regulatory permit amendments to the CWA Section 401 and 404 permits and Section 1602 Streambed Alteration Agreement for the I-405 Sepulveda Pass Widening Project. The permit amendments included a review of the jurisdictional delineation and coordination with USACE and CDFW for specific questions regarding jurisdiction and impacts. On-Call Environmental Services, Los Angeles County Department of Public Works (LACDPW), CA Senior Project Manager/Biologist/Permitting Specialist. Lisa was responsible for coordination with LACDPW regarding biological resource surveys for sensitive species/habitat, protocol-level surveys, jurisdictional waters and wetlands delineations, environmental documentation, and construction monitoring in support of regulatory permits in Los Angeles County and the Angeles National Forest. Over 100 task orders have been completed on the on-call contract over the past decade. On-Call Environmental Services, Orange County Public Works (OCPW), CA Senior Project Manager/Biologist/Permitting Specialist. Lisa was responsible for coordination with OCPW regarding regulatory permits, including coastal permits, biological resource surveys for sensitive species/habitat, protocol-level surveys, environmental documentation, jurisdictional delineations of waters and wetlands, and construction monitoring in support of regulatory permits in Orange County. Emergency Sediment and Debris Removal Permitting, Los Angeles County Department of Public Works (LACDPW), CA Senior Project Manager, Regulatory Permitting Specialist. Lisa prepared the regulatory permits for emergency activities for sediment removal following the recent Woolsey fire and first rain event. Emergency activities included both sediment and debris removal as well as temporary construction of new retaining structures. The permits included Regional General Permit (RGP) 63 for USACE and RWQCB as well as emergency Lake and Streambed Alteration Agreements for CDFW. She also managed the desktop level review of biological resources previously known to occur in the project area prior to the Woolsey Fire as well as reconnaissance level surveys to identify whether any of the known biological resources remain onsite. Cactus Avenue Widening, CEQA, Biological, and Cultural Services, City of Moreno Valley, Proactive Engineering Consultants, Inc., Riverside County, CA Regulatory Permitting Specialist. Lisa assisted with the preparation of the regulatory permits, including QA/QC review of the jurisdictional delineation, for the addition of a third eastbound lane on Cactus Avenue between Veterans Way and Heacock Street in the City of Moreno Valley. The widening of this road required improvements to storm drain facilities, street lights, and signal modifications at five intersections. Chambers Group provided a jurisdictional delineation, a burrowing owl survey, a cultural resources survey, and provided information in assistance with a CEQA IS/MND. Regulatory permits included the USACE CWA 404 permit, CDFW Section 1602 SAA, and RWQCB CWA 401 permit. The project also required compliance with the Western Riverside County MSHCP. Sepulveda Boulevard over Dominguez Channel Project, Permitting, City of Carson & Caltrans, RKA Group, Carson, Los Angeles County, CA Regulatory Permitting Specialist. Lisa prepared the application packages for the Section 404 nationwide permit for USACE, Section 401 water quality certification for RWQCB, and Section 1602 Streambed Alteration Agreement for CDFW. The project involves widening the Sepulveda Blvd. bridge over the Dominguez Channel by adding a median and sidewalks on both sides of the bridge to improve road safety and reduce traffic congestion by allowing for better traffic circulation. 309 1 Ted M. Roberts, MA, RPA Cultural Services | Cultural Services Department Head Professional Experience Ted has nearly 20 years of archaeological and cultural resource management experience in the private sector, the government, and academic institutions. Ted concentrates on innovative solutions to cultural resource hurdles and his passion for client service, project management, and the resource has long defined his career. Ted excels at business development, project and office management, and regional strategic planning. He also has considerable experience with business development, operations, marketing, recruiting, training temporary and permanent staff, supervising fieldwork, reporting, conducting artifact analysis, and scheduling. In all, Ted has managed and performed archaeological survey, eligibility testing, and data recovery projects on archaeological sites across the American West, including Arizona, California, Colorado, Nevada, New Mexico, Wyoming, and Utah. Roberts has also worked extensively in Florida, Georgia, Massachusetts, Michigan, Mississippi, New Jersey, New York, Ohio, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, and Vermont. Ted has presented original research at the annual meetings of the Society for American Archaeology (SAA), the New York Archaeological Council (NYAC), New York State Archaeological Association (NYSAA), the Arizona Archaeological Council (AAC), the Pecos Conference, the Arizona Historic Preservation Conference (AHPC), and the Annual Conference of the Archaeological Society of South Carolina (ASSC). Project Experience Carlsbad Boulevard Island Way Archaeological and Paleontological Monitoring, City of Carlsbad, CA Principal Investigator. This project involved construction monitoring for the City of Carlsbad’s corrugated metal pipe project on Carlsbad Blvd. Archaeological and Native American Monitors attended the pre-construction meeting, instructed crew on types of cultural resources present in the area, and monitored all construction activities. Commercial Use Phase I Cultural Survey in Jurupa Valley, Control Management, Inc., Riverside County, CA Principal Investigator. A Phase 1 cultural and paleontological study was completed for this proposed 16.22-acre commercial development project located between the southeast corner of Van Buren Blvd and Rutile Street. The results of the cultural study were negative and no further cultural resources investigations was recommended. The paleo literature review concluded that Pleistocene alluvial deposits were present and have a high potential for containing significant paleo resources. A paleo resource mitigation program was recommended if excavations exceed 5-10 feet below surface. Shake Shack Cultural Monitoring, Terracon, San Diego County, CA Principal Investigator. This project involved construction monitoring of all ground disturbing activities associated with the construction of a Shake Shack restaurant in San Diego. Archaeological and Native American Monitors were present for all ground- EDUCATION MA, Anthropology, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, Arizona, 2008 BA, Anthropology, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan, 2002 CERTIFICATIONS Registered Professional Archaeologist (RPA) AFFILIATIONS Member of the Society for California Archaeology (SCA) Member of the Society for American Archaeology (SAA) Certified Professional Archaeologist, Orange County Past Board Member for the New York Archaeological Council (NYAC), member of the Society for American Archaeology (SAA) Past Newsletter Editor of the Professional Archaeologists of New York City (PANYC), member of several other interest and advocacy groups, including the Midwest Archaeological Council (MAC), the Council for Northeast Historical Archaeology (CNEHA), and the Society for Industrial Archeology (Roebling Chapter), past Secretary of the Metropolitan Chapter of the New York State Archaeological Association (NYSAA); Past President of the Arizona Archaeological Council (AAC) 310 2 disturbing construction activities. Historic artifacts were collected at the site and curated in compliance with the project’s MMRCP. Phase I Cultural Resource Survey, Murrieta Petroleum, LLC, Murrieta, Riverside County, CA Principal Investigator. A Phase 1 cultural and paleontological study was completed for this proposed 1.77-acre commercial development project located on the southeast corner of Clinton Keith Road and McElwain in Murrieta, CA. The results of the study were negative and no further cultural resources or paleontological investigations was recommended. Fallbrook Battery Cultural Resources Survey, Haley & Aldrich, Inc., San Diego County, CA Principal Investigator. An updated cultural resources survey report was completed which included addressing any comments from the San Diego county on the initial report, a site survey with NAM was completed as the project boundary had been changed. The results of that survey were included in the updated cultural resources report which was written by Shelby Castells from Red Tail. No significant historic or prehistoric resources were identified. Monitoring by an arch and NAM was recommended during initial grading due to the poor ground visibility during the phase 1 survey. IS-EIR 22-Unit Condo, City of La Puente, La Puente, CA Principal. Chambers Group completed a Historic Assessment of the Star Theatre. Conducted additional research on the property, conducted site visits to document the current condition of the building and project site. Developed "historic context" of the building. Conducted evaluation of the property and recordation on appropriate forms. The Historic Structure Report included a summary and review of historic research, the historic context, the field recordation and documentation of the theater, findings, and proposed mitigation measures. Eligibility Evaluations of 581 Archaeological Sites, Fort Irwin, National Training Center, San Bernardino County, CA Principal Investigator/Project Director. Eligibility Evaluations of 581 Archaeological Sites, Fort Irwin, National Training Center, San Bernardino County, California. This project entailed evaluating the eligibility of 581 sites at Fort Irwin and National Training Center for inclusion in the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP) and management recommendations for these sites. The eligibility evaluations and recommendations are based upon revisits to the 581 archaeological sites as well as archival and documentary research. In addition to the 575 sites evaluated, six other purported archaeological sites were revisited and evaluated. These sites had been recently reported (2011) but not thoroughly recorded. All of these resource locations were relocated and all were found to lack the necessary artifact count and density to qualify as a site based on Fort Irwin criteria. The findings in this report address the reliability of site records – more specifically, an evaluation of how precise information about site location, nature, and condition was found to be in original site records, and the degree to which sites have been altered by military training activities and natural erosion. The 575 sites comprised 502 prehistoric sites, 45 historic sites, 16 multicomponent sites, and 12 undated sites. Of the 575 sites, 56 were recommended as eligible to the NRHP, and 519 were recommended as not eligible. 311 1 Kyle Knabb, PhD Cultural Resources | Archaeologist Professional Experience Kyle Knabb, Ph.D. has 14 years of experience in archaeology and two years of CRM experience in southern California. He has conducted Phase I archaeological surveys near the Salton Sea and in Anza Borrego, has directed numerous survey projects in southern Jordan, and has monitored construction projects in Los Angeles, San Diego, and Orange County. Dr. Knabb has also conducted extended Phase I and Phase II excavations throughout Los Angeles and San Diego County. He managed two major archaeological projects in Jordan in which he adhered to budgets totaling over $25,000. He has strong technical and analytical writing skills and has authored archaeological reports, research proposals, project budgets, peer-reviewed articles, and other summary documents. He has an expertise in GIS (ArcGIS, QGIS, R) and is adept in the use of various GPS units. Project Experience Carlsbad Boulevard Island Way Archaeological and Paleontological Monitoring, City of Carlsbad, CA Lead Archaeologist. Kyle coordinated archaeological monitors and reporting with the client. This project involved construction monitoring for the City of Carlsbad’s corrugated metal pipe project on Carlsbad Blvd. Archaeological and Native American Monitors attended the pre-construction meeting, instructed crew on types of cultural resources present in the area, and monitored all construction activities. Commercial Use Phase I Cultural Survey in Jurupa Valley, Control Management, Inc., Riverside County, CA Lead Archaeologist. Kyle worked on the Phase 1 cultural and paleontological study for a proposed 16.22-acre commercial development project located between the southeast corner of Van Buren Blvd and Rutile Street. The results of the cultural study were negative and no further cultural resources investigations was recommended. The paleo literature review concluded that Pleistocene alluvial deposits were present and have a high potential for containing significant paleo resources. A paleo resource mitigation program was recommended if excavations exceed 5-10 feet below surface. Shake Shack Cultural Monitoring, Terracon, San Diego County, CA Lead Archaeologist. Kyle coordinated archaeological monitors and reporting with the client. This project involved construction monitoring of all ground disturbing activities associated with the construction of a Shake Shack restaurant in San Diego. Archaeological and Native American Monitors were present for all ground-disturbing construction activities. Historic artifacts were collected at the site and curated in compliance with the project’s MMRCP. Otay Lakes Campground, San Diego County, California Lead Archaeologist. Dr. Knabb led the cultural resources efforts for the development of an EIR for development of a campground in Otay Mesa. This included conducting a desktop study, leading an archaeological survey, and preparation of a CEQA technical report. EDUCATION PhD, Anthropology, 2015, University of California, San Diego MA, Anthropology, 2008, University of California, San Diego BA, Anthropology, 2005, University of California, San Diego AFFILIATIONS Society for American Archaeology Society for California Archaeology Registered Professional Archaeologist (ID#17065) 312 2 Archaeological Testing for Pole Replacement in Mission Trails Regional Park, San Diego, CA Lead Archaeologist. Dr. Knabb led the testing efforts to identify potential impacts to an archaeological site in Mission Trails Regional Park. He supervised the field staff, directed excavation efforts, coordinated with SDG&E staff, park staff, tribal monitors, and UXO consultants, and consulted with the client and the city on the site’s eligibility for listing on the California Register of Historic Resources and the City of San Diego Register of Historical Resources. On-call cultural resources services for San Diego Gas & Electric Lead Archaeologist. Dr. Knabb is the project manager and point of contact for the company’s Master Service Agreement (MSA) with San Diego Gas & Electric’s cultural resources CEQA compliance program. He supervises field staff, provides QA/QC on deliverables and project budgets, and ensures deliverables are received on time. He has managed six task orders in the City of San Diego, the City of Dana Point, and San Diego County. Skookumchuck Cultural Resources Survey, Washington Lead Archaeologist. Dr. Knabb led the 2019 season of survey in Skookumchuck, WA, and contributed to the SEPA report for the project. Rincon Consultants, Inc. Archaeologist. Conducted data recovery excavation of prehistoric human remains in Malibu, CA, and monitored subsequent construction activities. Identified discoveries made during construction activity, collected cultural resources for analysis and cataloging. Communicated with project managers, Native American monitor, and clients. Recorded notes, prepared site forms, and illustrated site plans and profiles. AECOM Archaeologist. Monitored construction activities at historic site in Los Angeles and assisted in the identification and evaluation of a cement feature. Conducted laboratory analysis and cataloging of historical artifacts from downtown Los Angeles. California Department of Parks and Recreation Archaeologist, Project Leader. Monitored construction activities in Cuyamaca Rancho State Park, Crystal Cove SP, Silver Strand SP, and Border Field SP. Identified cultural resource presence/absence during construction activities. Wrote cultural resources reports in support of CEQA compliance. Conducted Phase I archaeological surveys and Phase II excavations at prehistoric and historic sites. Used handheld Trimble GPS to record new sites. Created maps using ArcGIS and carried out laboratory analysis of field data. SWCA, Inc. Cultural Resource Specialist. Conducted data recovery excavations at an historic site in downtown Los Angeles. 313 1 Lauren DeOliviera, MS Cultural Resources | Archaeologist Professional Experience Lauren DeOliveira is a Staff Cultural Resources Specialist at Chambers Group, Inc. Lauren has more than ten years of academic and professional experience in research and archaeological fieldwork in Southern California. Lauren has worked extensively throughout Southern California specifically conducting Phase I surveys, Extended Phase I testing, Phase II testing and Phase III Excavation projects. Also, Lauren has extensive experience managing field technicians on construction monitoring projects and has completed numerous monitoring projects herself. Working with construction site superintendents, project managers and developers, Lauren has been able to preserve countless cultural resources on various construction sites through Southern California ranging from isolated artifacts to intact middens to Native American burials. Lauren has eight years of experience conducting cultural resources investigation projects in compliance with Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act, the National Environmental Policy Act, and the California Environmental Quality Act as they pertain to cultural resources. Her research and professional experience includes GIS Probability modeling of archaeological sites on the Channel Islands, California archaeology, and cultural resources management in the interior and coastal regions of California. Project Experience Avalon K-12 New Synthetic Turf Project, Long Beach Unified School District, Los Angeles County, CA Project Manager. Lauren performed research, reporting, and tribal coordination for a Phase 1 cultural study for a proposed HVAC upgrades and new synthetic turf field within the Avalon K-12 campus in Avalon, CA. The results of the study were negative and no further cultural resources investigations were recommended. Phase I Cultural Resource Survey, Murrieta Petroleum, LLC, Murrieta, Riverside County, CA Lead Archaeologist. Lauren performed research, reporting, and tribal coordination for a Phase 1 cultural and paleontological study for a proposed 1.77-acre commercial development project located on the southeast corner of Clinton Keith Road and McElwain in Murrieta, CA. The results of the study were negative and no further cultural resources or paleontological investigations was recommended. Fallbrook Battery Cultural Resources Survey, Haley & Aldrich, Inc., San Diego County, CA Lead Archaeologist. Lauren performed research, reporting, and tribal coordination for an updated cultural resources survey report which included addressing any comments from the San Diego county on the initial report. A site survey with NAM was completed as the project boundary had been changed. The results of that survey were included in the updated cultural resources report which was written by Shelby Castells from Red Tail. No significant historic or prehistoric resources were identified. Monitoring by an arch and NAM was recommended during initial grading due to the poor ground visibility during the phase 1 survey. EDUCATION MS, Geographic Information Systems, California State University Northridge, 2018 BA, Liberal Studies, California State University Channel Islands, Camarillo, CA, 2010 Thesis title: “Archaeology of Santa Rosa Island: A GIS Probability Model” 314 2 Commercial Use Phase I Cultural Survey in Jurupa Valley, Control Management, Inc., Riverside County, CA Archaeologist. Lauren helped with a Phase 1 cultural and paleontological study for a proposed 16.22-acre commercial development project located between the southeast corner of Van Buren Blvd and Rutile Street. The results of the cultural study were negative and no further cultural resources investigations was recommended. The paleo literature review concluded that Pleistocene alluvial deposits were present and have a high potential for containing significant paleo resources. A paleo resource mitigation program was recommended if excavations exceed 5-10 feet below surface. Rincon Consultants, Inc., Ventura, CA Archaeologist. Completed excavations for a burial recovery project located in Malibu, CA. The recovery efforts included locating, identifying, exposing, and removing remains and associated artifacts that would then be repatriated to the designated Chumash Most Likely Descendant. I was responsible for identifying, exposing, removing, and inventorying remains as well as completing detailed maps, notes, photographs and other documentation associated with each completed recovery. I was also responsible for archaeological construction monitoring including identifying and evaluating cultural resources, compiling photographs and completing documentation of daily construction activity and compliance of all construction crews involved. Historical Environmental Archaeological Research Team, West Hills, CA Project Manager. Subject Matter Expert (SME) in monitoring large-scale archaeological projects, working directly with local Indian Tribes, Superintendents, Foremen, construction crews, and scientists, ensuring that scientific and systematic procedures are followed. Lauren identify, evaluate, and monitor cultural resources including potential threats. Experience in giving recommendations to management regarding status and mitigation of impacts. Lauren was responsible for planning and implementing cultural resource programs. Lauren was an SME in coastal Chumash archaeology which included sites on Santa Cruz Island, Malibu, Camarillo, Pt Mugu area etc., although Lauren have worked in outlying areas including desert areas such as Palm Desert, Hemet, and Lancaster. Lauren was an SME in independently planning, directing, coordinating, and executing archaeological surveys, for the location and verification of archaeological/historical sites, and archaeological excavations; consisting of keeping accurate field notes concerning cultural and natural features such as vegetation and topography. Ability to draft site maps utilizing GIS, GPS and Archmap software. Lauren identified and collected all archaeological artifacts. Lauren analyzed all artifacts, in a laboratory setting, and prepared them for curation. Collected and reported all human remains found and prepared the remains to be returned to the Native Americans for curating or reburial as per NAGPRA (Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation ACT). Lauren was an SME on organizing comprehensive written reports on all surveys, monitoring, testing, maps, inventories, site records/evaluations, and artifacts, as well as archival research on site areas prior to field work. Prepared any and all photos, site record reports, or field notes to be submitted for review by the Principal Investigator. Consulted with recognized Indian Tribes including Chumash, Gabrielino, Agua Caliente, and Soboba Tribes. Lauren has worked alongside Biologists and Environmental Professionals on various large-scale projects, with various agencies, and have assisted in areas of native fauna and flora monitoring when necessary. 315 1 Joe Stewart, PhD Cultural Resources | Paleontologist Professional Experience Dr. Stewart is currently am employed as a vertebrate paleontologist with 40 years of experience in paleontology and more than 30 years of experience in the geology and paleontology of California. He has been involved in the permitting or construction of more than ten power plants and has directed the paleontological monitoring and mitigation program for Path 15, a major transmission line project. His publications include more than 40 peer-reviewed articles in books and journals, and his research specialties are fossil fishes and Pleistocene vertebrate faunas, especially those of California deserts Project Experience Banducci Substation Fiber Optic Line, Southern California Edison, Subconsultant to TRC Companies, Inc., City of Tehachapi, Kern County, CA Lead author Final Paleontological report. Earth moving activities were monitored for paleontological resources on 18 days of construction. No paleontological resources were detected. Thus, impacts to paleontological resources in the vicinity of the project area near Tehachapi were less than significant. ISEC West Solar Project Supervised paleontological monitoring on private lands. BrightSource Sonoran West Solar Project Supervised paleontological survey on BLM and private lands. Worked on AFC and wrote final report when project was terminated. TerraGen Project Performed pedestrian paleontological survey of project site and wrote the Paleontological Resources section for the AFC. BrightSource Rio Mesa Solar Project Supervised paleontological survey on BLM and private lands. Wrote the Paleontological Resources section for the AFC. Pio Pico Energy Center Supervised paleontological survey and wrote the Paleontological Resources section for the AFC. Mesquite Nevada Replacement General Aviation Airport Wrote the paleontological Resource Assessment for the Federal Aviation Administration. Marsh Landing Generating Station Application for Certification Performed paleontological pedestrian survey of project area in Contra Costa County and wrote the paleontological resource section of the AFC. Served as Paleontological Resource Specialist for construction. Wrote final report. EDUCATION MA, Systematics & Ecology, University of Kansas, 1979 PhD, Systematics & Ecology, University of Kansas, 1984 AFFILIATIONS Society of Vertebrate Paleontology CERTIFICATIONS Certified Paleontologist, Orange and Riverside counties, California Hazardous Waste Operations and Emergency Response 40 Hr. General Site Worker AREAS OF EXPERTISE NEPA and CEQA Compliance Project Management Principal Investigator Paleontological Management and Treatment 316 2 Imperial Valley Solar Application for Certification, 2008-2010 Directed paleontological pedestrian survey of project area in San Bernardino County and wrote the paleontological resource section of the AFC. Calico Solar Application for Certification Participated in paleontological pedestrian survey of project area, edited the paleontology section of the AFC, and am served as Paleontological Resource Specialist. Starwood Power-Midway, LLC Peaking Project Construction Wrote mitigation plan for paleontological resources, oversaw monitoring for paleontological resources, and wrote final report. Calnev Pipeline Project Directed paleontological survey of 234-mile long project area in San Bernardino County, California and Clark County, Nevada and wrote the paleontological assessment. Willow Pass Generating Station Application for Certification Participated in paleontological pedestrian survey of project area in Contra Costa County and wrote the paleontological resource section of the AFC. San Joaquin One and Two Application for Certification Directed paleontological pedestrian survey of project area in Fresno County and wrote the paleontological resource section of the AFC. Carrizo Energy Solar Farm (Ausra) Application for Certification Participated in paleontological pedestrian survey of project area and edited the paleontology section of the AFC. Starwood Power-Midway, LLC Peaking Project Application for Certification Participated in the responses to the CEC Provisional Staff Assessments. Path 15 500-kV Power Transmission Line between Los Banos and Gates substations Supervised paleontological resource monitoring, excavations, specimen preparation, specimen identification, and report writing for 80-mile power line. 317 1 Greg Tonkovich, AICP, INCE Air Quality, Greenhouse Gas, Noise Impacts Vista Environmental Professional Experience Greg Tonkovich has over 15 years of environmental consulting experience and over 13 years of air quality and noise analysis experience. He specializes in air quality and noise impact analyses for governmental agencies and the business community and has completed numerous complex air and noise studies that conform to both the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) requirements. Greg’s air quality analysis experience includes global climate change analyses and health risk assessments. He is proficient in utilizing CalEEMod, URBEMIS2007, CALINE4, ISCST3, AERMOD, EMFAC2014, and OFFROAD2011 models, in order to quantify emissions impacts as well as to assess the efficacy of proposed mitigation. Greg is also experienced in noise analyses and is proficient in utilizing FHWA Traffic Noise Model (TNM), FHWA Roadway Construction Noise Model (RCNM), FAA Integrated Noise Model (INM), and SoundPlan. In addition, he has created and implemented a noise program based on the FHWA Standard. Through the use of the above models he is able to efficiently determine noise impacts to nearby sensitive land uses and assess the efficacy of proposed mitigation. He has successfully run an environmental consulting business for over nine years and has been responsible in managing costs, scheduling, and accounting. Greg has a proven record of preparing air quality and noise impact analyses to successful completion. During his 15 year career he has prepared more than 400 environmental documents with a 100 percent success rate. Greg is experienced in a wide range of project types, including: residential, commercial, industrial, and recreational projects as well as public projects that include specific plans and general plans. He has prepared studies to specific standards and formats such as Caltrans Air Quality and Noise Study Reports and has completed air quality and/or noise analyses in over 150 different local jurisdictions throughout California. Project Experience Camino Town & Country Center Revitalization Project, Oceanside, CA. Mr. Tonkovich prepared an Air Quality and Global Climate Change Analysis, a Health Risk Assessment (HRA) and Noise Impact Analysis for the demolition of 84,305 square feet of existing building space and construction of 109,150 square feet of shopping center building space. The air quality and GHG report analyzed the regional construction and operational air and GHG emissions with the CalEEMod model and provided a qualitative analysis of local fugitive dust impacts from construction. The analysis found that construction and operational activities would create less than significant air quality impacts. The GHG analysis compared the business-as-usual GHG emissions to the with project year 2020 GHG emissions and found that the proposed project would result in a significant GHG emissions impact. Mitigation was provided that limited parking supply, required the installation of four electric vehicle charging EDUCATION MS, Electrical Engineering, University of Southern California BS, Planning and Development, University of Southern California CERTIFICATIONS American Institute of Certified Planners (AICP) American Planning Association (APA) Institute of Noise Control Engineering (INCE) State of California General ‘B’ Contractors License TRAINING Stays up to date with modeling techniques and regulations through continuing education courses 318 2 stations, improvements to pedestrian network, and implementation of a ride sharing program to the shopping center employees. With implementation of the GHG mitigation measures, the GHG emissions were reduced to less than significant levels. The HRA utilized diesel truck running and idling emission rates from the EMFAC2014 model, TRU emission rates from the OFFROAD2011 model and the AERMOD View to calculate the diesel particulate matter (DPM) concentrations from operation of the proposed project at the nearby sensitive receptors. No significant health risks were found. The noise analysis utilized the FHWA’s RCNM model to analyze the noise impacts from onsite construction activities and utilized the FHWA RD-77-108 model to analyze the noise impacts associated with the additional vehicles on the nearby roads and utilized typical noise propagation rates to analyze the new onsite stationary noise sources. No significant construction or operational noise or vibration impacts were found. Eastvale Crossings Project, Eastvale, CA. Mr. Tonkovich prepared a Health Risk Assessment and an EIR Noise Section that analyzed the development of a 192,000 square foot shopping center on a 19.06-acre parcel. The HRA utilized diesel truck running and idling emission rates from the EMFAC2014 model, TRU emission rates from the OFFROAD2011 model and the AERMOD View to calculate the diesel particulate matter (DPM) concentrations and local criteria pollutant concentrations from operation of the proposed project at the nearby sensitive receptors. No significant health risks were found. The noise analysis utilized the FHWA’s RCNM model to analyze the noise impacts from onsite construction activities, utilized the FHWA RD-77- 108 model to analyze the noise impacts associated with the project generated vehicle trips on the nearby roads, and SoundPlan to analyze the stationary source noise impacts to the nearby homes and park. No significant construction or operational noise or vibration impacts were found. Los Alamitos Hotel & Drive-Thru Project, Los Alamitos, CA. Mr. Tonkovich prepared an Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Impact Analysis and a Noise Impact Analysis that analyzed the development of a 108 room hotel and an 800 square foot drive-through only coffee shop. The air quality and greenhouse gas emissions analyses utilized the CalEEMod model to analyze the regional air and GHG emissions from construction and operational activities and the SCAQMD’s Look-Up Tables were utilized to analyze the criteria pollutants local air concentrations at the nearby sensitive receptors. No significant air quality or GHG emissions impacts were found. The noise analysis utilized the FHWA’s RCNM model to analyze the noise impacts from onsite construction activities, utilized the FHWA RD-77-108 model to analyze the noise impacts associated with the project generated vehicle trips on the nearby roads, and utilized standard noise drop-off rates and reference noise measurements of drive thru speakers, rooftop mechanical equipment, public pools, and parking lot noise to analyze the stationary source noise impacts to the nearby homes. No significant construction or operational noise or vibration impacts were found. Newport Learning Center Project, Newport Beach, CA. Noise Specialist. Mr. Tonkovich prepared a noise impact analysis for the development of a 67,000 square foot building and associated infrastructure that would include classrooms, an art gallery, administrative offices, and kitchen facilities for the Coastline Community College District. The noise study report utilized the RCNM model for construction noise and a version of the FHWA model to analyze operational roadway noise. The noise analysis found a significant construction noise impact would occur and provided mitigation that limited the hours construction activities may occur, required that equipment be properly maintained and required the use of temporary sound barriers. 319 1 Tyree Burns, PE Geology, Hazards, Hydrology Haley & Aldrich Professional Experience Ms. Burns is a Technical Specialist with ten years of experience in environmental consulting. She specializes in conducting Phase I and Phase II environmental due diligence investigations, soil and groundwater remediation system design, and regulatory compliance activities. Ms. Burns has conducted Phase II subsurface investigations for contaminant releases from petroleum underground storage tanks (USTs) and industrial facility operations. She is responsible for coordinating site assessment and remediation project work for multiple sites throughout Southern California. Project work includes developing site assessment strategy and analyzing site assessment data for various commercial and industrial clients. She has experience preparing and conducting feasibility studies, preparing soil and groundwater investigation workplans, conducting soil and groundwater environmental investigations, pilot testing, remediation system design, permitting, remediation system operation and maintenance, and remediation system optimization. Project Experience Industrial Stormwater Compliance, Southern California. Provided industrial stormwater compliance and monitoring oversight for 13 waste disposal and recycling facilities across southern California. Responsible for project, budget, and contract management, field inspection coordination, laboratory oversight, weather tracking, data management, annual reporting, Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) development and implementation, and State Water Resources Control Board database reporting associated with 2015 permit regulations. Confidential Aerospace Manufacturer, Southern CA. Serving as technical specialist for an active aerospace manufacturing facility where VOCs have impacted soil and groundwater. Ms. Burns’ responsibilities include providing monitoring and maintenance (OM&M) support for the groundwater extraction and treatment (GET) system using Advanced Oxidation Processes (AOP) and granular activated carbon (GAC) treatment processes. Her work includes overseeing National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) and municipal sewer permit compliance, NPDES report preparation, and managing routine O&M activities. Various Commercial and Industrial Facilities, Phase I Environmental Site Assessments, San Diego, CA. Performed Phase I due diligence assessment that included coordinating and conducting interviews and site reconnaissance in accordance with ASTM E 1527-13. Duties included reviewing site historical data to identify recognized environmental conditions associated at a property and prepared reports to present these findings. Earl Warren Middle School, San Diego Unified School District, California. Prepared a workplan in accordance with Department of Toxic Substance Control (DTSC) guidance documents for assessment of lead, PCBs, and pesticides in shallow soil at the school campus. The purpose of the soil assessment was to evaluate shallow soil conditions and facilitate proposed school renovations. The project required close coordination with DTSC to complete the field and reporting efforts to meet the schools planned construction schedule. EDUCATION B.S., Environmental Engineering, San Diego State University, 2005 REGISTRATIONS 2018/ CA: Professional Engineer (No. 89501) SPECIAL STUDIES AND COURSES 40-Hour OSHA Hazardous Waste Operations and Emergency Response Training (29 CFR 1910.120) 8-Hour OSHA HAZWOPER Refresher Training 8-Hour OSHA Site Supervisor Training American Red Cross First Aid Training and CPR Course, October 2017 320 2 321 1 Duane Baluran, EIT, QSP Geology, Hazards, Hydrology Haley & Aldrich Professional Experience Mr. Baluran is an engineer with experience in design and consulting engineering, and will focus his time at Haley & Aldrich serving industrial environmental markets. He is skilled in drafting using AutoCAD Civil 3D to produce Grading, Street Improvement, and Erosion Control Plans in compliance with the City of Los Angeles Standard Plans. Furthermore, he is experienced in construction stormwater compliance, NPDES compliance support, field investigations, monitoring and reporting, Best Management Practice design and performance, and low impact development. He provided water quality assistance to both public and private clients, including document preparation, document review, and field implementation. Project Experience Confidential Client, Canoga Park, CA. Currently providing individual NPDES stormwater compliance oversight at a large, complex site. Responsible for evaluating best management practice (BMP) inspection reports, conducting data analysis and management, implementing Quality Assurance Project Plans (QAPPs), providing weather station oversight, implementing the site-wide SWPPP, implementing electronic field data collection forms, and performing QSD inspections for BMP evaluation. During the rainy season, he is on call 7 days a week to provide real-time stormwater tracking, communication, and immediate response to sample during all rain events. Porterville Laydown Yard, Porterville, CA. Assistant engineer for stormwater compliant consultant services for the development of a laydown yard for Southern California Edison equipment to be stored. Consultant services included developing a traditional SWPPP. During construction, weekly site inspections would be conducted to ensure the SWPPP was being properly implemented in the field, creating SWPPP amendments as needed, and utilizing SMARTS to update the status of the project. Berkshire Residential Plan, Chino, CA. Assistant engineer for stormwater compliant consultant services for the development of a residential community consisting of 56 single family units for Lennar Homes of California, Inc. Consultant services included developing a traditional SWPPP and creating SWPPP amendments as needed, and utilizing SMARTS to update the status of the project. Boston Global Investors, United Technologies Corporation Warner Center Property, Canoga Park, CA. As the field representative, supported demolition activities and provided Construction Administration services for this 48-acre demolition and property re-development project. Former Aerospace Manufacturing Site, Assessment, Los Angeles, CA. Field representative for a Phase II groundwater investigation conducted in public right of ways surrounding the former site. Currently assisting the geologist in the semi-annual groundwater sampling events for over 80 monitoring wells. EDUCATION B.S., Civil Engineer, San Diego State University, 2013 REGISTRATIONS 2016 / CA: Engineer in Training (Reg. No. 159662) 2017 / CA: Qualified SWPPP Practitioner (QSP) (No. 26245) PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATIONS American Public Works Association, 2014-2015 American Water Works Association – SDSU Chapter-Founder, Professional Advancement, 2013 American Society of Civil Engineers – SDSU Chapter, Events Chair, 2012-2013 322 1 David S. Shender, PE Traffic Studies, Transportation Linscott, Law & Greenspan Professional Experience Mr. Shender has over 30 years of experience within the traffic engineering and transportation planning industry, with particular emphasis in the preparation of master planning site access and circulation studies, parking studies, and CEQA-related environmental documentation for a variety of projects, with particular focus on the formulation of comprehensive transportation mitigation packages. Mr. Shender has extensive experience in presenting transportation studies to a spectrum of audiences including land-use decision-makers and community groups. Mr. Shender is a Principal of LLG’s office in Woodland Hills, California. Project Experience Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, City of Los Angeles, California, On-going Principal-in-Charge. LLG has provided on-going traffic engineering consulting services to Cedars-Sinai since the 1970s. Mr. Shender provides consultation to the Medical Center related to implementation of the Master Plan, including recommendations with respect to site logistics during construction, locations of employee and patient/visitor parking, emergency vehicle access, pedestrian circulation, transit bus routing, service vehicle access, etc. Kaiser Permanente Medical Center: Emergency Dept. Expansion, Woodland Hills, California, 2020 Principal-in-Charge. LLG provides on-going consulting services to Kaiser Permanente, including the review of traffic and parking operations of its various medical center campuses throughout Los Angeles including Sunset Medical Center, Woodland Hills, Panorama City, and West Los Angeles. LLG is currently providing traffic engineering consulting services related to the expansion of the Emergency Department at Kaiser Permanente’s Woodland Hills Medical Center. Hollywood Park Mixed-Use Redevelopment Project, City of Inglewood, California, On-going Principal-in-Charge. LLG has worked within a design team to determine options for redevelopment of the 300-acre Hollywood Park site. Potential components include a football stadium, retail, restaurants, entertainment, gaming, residential, hotel, recreational and civic uses. Mr. Shender directed the evaluation of existing and future traffic flow adjacent to and in the vicinity of the site. Based on these projections, Mr. Shender provided recommendations with respect to points of vehicular access. Mr. Shender also provided guidelines with respect to “sizing” the internal roadway network that provides adequate vehicular circulation flow. EDUCATION B.S. Civil Engineering Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA M.S. Civil Engineering Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA CERTIFICATIONS Professional Engineer CA Registration C 45324 NV Registration 10220 323 1 Corinna M. Gutierrez, PE Traffic Studies, Transportation Linscott, Law & Greenspan Professional Experience Ms. Corinna Gutierrez has eight years of traffic engineering and transportation planning experience, with particular emphasis on the design of traffic signals, street lighting, signing and striping, and traffic control plans. In addition, Ms. Gutierrez has extensive experience in site access and internal circulation planning and the preparation of traffic impact studies and parking studies for both public agencies and the private sector for a variety of project developments in the greater Los Angeles region and areas of Ventura County. Project Experience Ponte Vista Project, City of Los Angeles, California, 2024 Project Manager. Traffic Study preparation and Environmental Impact Report support for the 700 unit residential project in the San Pedro area of the City of Los Angeles. Currently preparing traffic signal, signing/striping, nd street lighting construction documents for both the on-site and off-site street improvements for 16 locations located in various jurisdictions, including Caltrans, the City of Los Angeles, the City of Rancho Palos Verdes, and the City of Lomita. Harvard-Westlake: Parking Improvement Plan, City of Los Angeles, California, 2019 Project Manager. Traffic Study preparation and Environmental Impact Report support for the new multi-level parking structure for the existing Harvard-Westlake Upper School located in the Studio City area of the City of Los Angeles. Currently preparing traffic signal, signing/striping, and street lighting construction documents for the off- site street improvements along the project frontage. The Huntington Library, Art Collections, and Botanical Gardens: Education and Visitor Center Project, City of San Marino, California, 2013 Project Manager. Comprehensive review and analysis of all modes of transport entering the site from its two gates. This review included preparation of concept and construction design plans depicting new roadway alignments, new parking layouts, new pedestrian and bicycle paths, and new loading/unloading facilities for service vehicles and buses. The Village at Santa Monica, City of Santa Monica, California, 2014 Project Manager. Preparation of traffic signal and signing/striping construction documents for the installation of three new traffic signals in the Downtown area of Santa Monica, California. EDUCATION B.S. Civil Engineering University of California, Los Angeles CERTIFICATIONS Professional Engineer CA Registration C 82621 324 Santa Ana Glendale San Diego Riverside El Centro 600 WEST BROADWAY, SUITE 250 GLEN DALE, CA 91204 ... .... ... - - ... I'I ■■■■ ... 4 _.... 1 kb, ::. ■■■■ ... , ■.■ ■■■■ ►\ = = ■•• ■■■■ I r iiiril = ... �1 illA IL _ _ ... ��� 4 I/ � Ri\ 1 , 11 N s,\\ 41 ,_,, , : '�f �r Imo, #" \_ j1 j lkl' _ ----- liF ', t"--,7,Z- - -lif ;\.------,:ji::::-. 11 •',1) 1 14 -';',10,1i°., r 41,-' - -, Attic 000;:l'-'.''''' -7 i 0 .4t Pe..... �`t'' CHAMBERS GROUP CA DGS AN EMPLOYEE- CPUC CERTIRED OWNED COMPANY CERTIFIED SBE ESOP WMBE CGI CGI CGI www.chambersgroupinc.com 325 RESOLUTION NO. 2019-____ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE FISCAL YEAR (FY) 2019/20 BUDGET BY APPROPRIATING $50,000 FROM THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT FUND (2200) FOR ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTING SERVICES WHEREAS, on June 19, 2019, the City Council adopted the Operating and Capital Improvements Budget for FY 2019/20, which included an appropriation of $150,000 in the Planning Division’s Contractual Services (2200-161-00000-51000) for environment consulting services; and WHEREAS, from time to time as part of community development and planning process, the City follows appropriate guidelines for the environmental review of development projects and other activities to ensure that the environment is protected and enhanced; and WHEREAS, the City is in need of professional and technical expertise to complete environmental review and prepare associated environmental documents in a timely manner. On May 3, 2019, the City issued a Request for Qualifications to solicit firms to provide these services and the City received twelve responses from consultants; and WHEREAS, a staff report has been presented to the City Council proposing to approve an agreement with two environmental consultants to allow flexibility to assign projects accordingly to avoid conflict of interest; and WHEREAS, a budget amendment of $50,000 from the Community Development Fund (2200) is required to fully fund the contracts; and WHEREAS, Exhibit “A”, attached hereto and made a part hereof, describes said budget amendment and the resultant impact to the budget line item. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. A budget amendment in the amount of $50,000 from the Community Development Fund (2200), as more particularly described in Exhibit ”A”, attached hereto, is hereby approved. SECTION 2. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this resolution and shall cause a certified resolution to be filed in the book of original resolutions. ATTACHMENT 3 326 Resolution No. 2019-___ Page 2 PASSED AND ADOPTED this 17th day of July, 2019. ________________________________ Janice S. Parvin, Mayor ATTEST: ___________________________________ Ky Spangler, City Clerk Exhibit A – Budget Amendment 327 Resolution No. 2019-___ Page 3 FUND BALANCE ALLOCATION: Fund-Account Number Amount 2200-000-00000-33990 50,000.00$ Total 50,000.00$ EXPENDITURE APPROPRIATION: Account Number Current Budget Revision Amended Budget 2200-161-00000-51000 150,000.00$ 50,000.00$ 200,000.00$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Total 150,000.00$ 50,000.00$ 200,000.00$ Community Development Fund EXHIBIT A BUDGET AMENDMENT FOR COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT FUND (2200) FOR ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTING SERVICES FY 2019/20 Fund Title 328