HomeMy WebLinkAboutAGENDA REPORT 2004 0519 CC REG ITEM 08AITl m _ T. A.
A �J
MOORPARK CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA REPORT
TO: Honorable City Council
FROM: Barry K. Hogan, Community Development Director
Prepared By: Joseph F. Fiss, Principal Plann
DATE: April 28, 2004 (CC Meeting of 05/19/04)
SUBJECT: Consider Conditional Use Permit No. 2004 -01 to Allow a
Warehouse /Distribution Facility in an Existing
Building in the M -1 (Industrial Park) Zone, Located at
5316 Kazuko Court, on the Application of Warren
Distributing (Assessors Parcel Number 511 -0- 070 -675)
BACKGROUND
Warren Distributing has submitted a request for a Conditional
Use Permit to occupy an existing 11,000 square foot building
located at 5316 Kazuko Court as a warehouse and distribution
facility for automotive and truck parts. The application
proposes occupancy of the building, including tenant
improvements consisting primarily of storage racks. No changes
to the exterior of the building are proposed at this time. The
Zoning Ordinance requires City Council approval of a Conditional
Use Permit for warehousing uses in the M -1 or M -2 zones. The
Planning Commission heard this case on April 20, 2004, and
adopted Resolution No. PC- 2004 -458 recommending that the City
Council approve this application, subject to the conditions
recommended by staff.
DISCUSSION
At the Planning Commission public hearing, a residential
neighbor of the site, Mrs. Dawn Newberry, spoke regarding
potential impacts of the warehouse use. Mrs. Newberry expressed
concerns regarding noise and hours of operation. These were
also the primary concerns of the Planning Commission. The
Planning Commission was satisfied that the Conditions of
Approval sufficiently addressed the potential nuisances, and
000001
Honorable City Council
May 19, 2004
Page 2
that violations of the Conditions of Approval would be grounds
for revocation of the Conditional Use Permit. A copy of the
agenda report to the Planning Commission is attached.
STAFF RECOMMNDATION
1. Open the public hearing, take public testimony and close
the public hearing.
2. Adopt Resolution No. 2004- approving Conditional Use
Permit No. 2004 -01.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. April 20, 2004, Planning Commission Agenda Report
2. Draft Resolution No. 2004- for Approval of Conditional
Use Permit No. 2004 -01
000002
MOORPARK PLANNING COMMISSION
AGENDA REPORT
TO: Honorable Planning Commission
FROM: Barry K. Hogan, Community Development Directo .,
Prepared by: Joseph Fiss, Principal Planner.
DATE: April 7, 2004 (PC Meeting of 4/20/04)
SUBJECT: Consider Conditional Use Permit No. 2004 -01 to Allow a
Warehouse /Distribution Facility in an Existing Building
in the M -1 (Industrial Park) Zone, Located at 5316 Kazuko
Court, on the Application of Warren Distributing
(Assessors Parcel Number 511 -0- 070 -675)
BACKGROUND /DISCUSSION
Warren Distributing has submitted a request for a Conditional Use
Permit to occupy an existing building as a warehouse and
distribution facility for automotive and truck parts. The
building, located at 5316 Kazuko Court, is approximately 11,000
square feet in floor area. The application proposes occupancy of
the building, including tenant improvements consisting primarily of
storage racks. No changes to the exterior of the building are
proposed at this time. The Zoning Ordinance requires approval of a
Conditional Use Permit for warehousing uses in the M -1 or M -2
zones.
Project Setting
Existina Site Conditions:
This building, constructed in 1989, is part of a series of existing
industrial buildings that were built in the late 1980's and early
1990's. No enlargement of the building is proposed at this time.
This building has been used for assembly of truss and staging
structures and most, recently as a machine shop. While this light
industrial area abuts the Shasta Street (Moorpark Estates)
residential neighborhood, access to the area is from Los Angeles
Avenue via Goldman Avenue or Maureen Lane.
Anticipated typical impacts from a warehouse are associated with
on- and off -site circulation, hours of operation and outdoor
\ \mor pri_sery \City Share \Community Development \DEV PMTS \C U P \2009 \ -01 Warren 000003
Distributing \Agenda Rpts \040420.Agenda Report.doc
CC ATTACHMENT 1
Honorable Planning Commission
April 20, 2004
Page 2
storage. A narrow landscaped buffer exists between the two land
uses. Regardless, there have been noise complaints regarding the
machine shop from some Shasta Street residents. All three of these
issues are discussed in detail in the analysis section of this
agenda report.
Previous Applications:
This building was originally approved in 1988 under Development
Plan (DP) 340. A subsequent outdoor equipment enclosure was
approved under Permit Adjustment No. 2001 -01. Other than tenant
improvements and occupancies, there have been no other approved
modifications to the building.
General Plan and Zoning Consistency:
The General Plan and Zoning designations of the site anticipate
this type of land use. Warehousing and Distribution uses are
consistent with the M -1 zone and the Light Industrial (I -1) General
Plan Land Use Designation. The I -1 designation is intended to
provide for a variety of industrial uses within the City. Suitable
uses include light industrial service, technical research and
business office use in a business park context.
Circulation:
The site takes access directly from Kazuko Court with a "looped"
driveway system that allows larger vehicles to enter and exit
without reversing. The applicant has indicated that inbound
deliveries are made once a day by a twenty -four foot (24') bob -tail
truck and outbound deliveries are made by small pick -up trucks and
compact cars. No deliveries are made by tractor /trailers. Issues
related to on- and off -site circulation are discussed further in
the Analysis section of this report.
Parking:
Twenty (20) parking spaces are provided on -site. Driveways and
backing areas are shared by the abutting and adjacent buildings.
000004
GENERAL PLAN /ZONING
Direction
General
Plan
Zoning
Land Use
Site
Light
Ind
(I -1)
M -1
Light
Industrial
North
Light
Ind
(I -1)
M -1
Light
Industrial
South
Light
Ind
(I -1)
M -1
Light
Industrial
East
Med Density
Res (M)
R -1
Single
Family Res
West
Light
Ind
(I -1)
M -1
Light
Industrial
General Plan and Zoning Consistency:
The General Plan and Zoning designations of the site anticipate
this type of land use. Warehousing and Distribution uses are
consistent with the M -1 zone and the Light Industrial (I -1) General
Plan Land Use Designation. The I -1 designation is intended to
provide for a variety of industrial uses within the City. Suitable
uses include light industrial service, technical research and
business office use in a business park context.
Circulation:
The site takes access directly from Kazuko Court with a "looped"
driveway system that allows larger vehicles to enter and exit
without reversing. The applicant has indicated that inbound
deliveries are made once a day by a twenty -four foot (24') bob -tail
truck and outbound deliveries are made by small pick -up trucks and
compact cars. No deliveries are made by tractor /trailers. Issues
related to on- and off -site circulation are discussed further in
the Analysis section of this report.
Parking:
Twenty (20) parking spaces are provided on -site. Driveways and
backing areas are shared by the abutting and adjacent buildings.
000004
Honorable Planning Commission
April 20, 2004
Page 3
There is one ADA Accessible parking
parking spaces. No modifications to
proposed or anticipated at this time.
Loading Area:
space on site and no compact
the parking lot striping are
Three (3) loading area(s) with loading doors are provided on the
south side of the building, easily accessible from the parking and
driveway area. These loading areas would not be easily accessible
by tractor /trailers; however, no deliveries are proposed to be made
by tractor /trailers. Any impacts to the adjacent residential
neighborhood would be related to hours of operation and delivery
times. This issue is discussed below in the Analysis section.
ANALYSIS
Issues
Staff analysis of the proposed project has identified the following
areas for Planning Commission consideration in their recommendation
to the City Council:
• On- and Off -Site Circulation
• Outdoor Storaae
• Hours of Operation
On- and Off -Site Circulation:
As discussed above, the site takes access directly from Kazuko
Court with a "looped" driveway system that allows larger vehicles
to enter and exit without reversing. Depending upon the size of
delivery vehicles, those vehicles can either turn around using the
loading area or continue the "loop" and exit from the opposite
driveway. This system limits the number of movements that a
vehicle is required to make to exit the site.
There is no access from the residential neighborhood to the east,
but there is some concern relative to trucks idling while loading
and unloading. A Condition of Approval has been added to limit the
"idling" time of vehicles to five (5) minutes so that impacts from
engine noise and exhaust will be mitigated. Delivery hours will
also be limited to 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday,
and 8:00 a.m. to 1:00 p.m. on Saturday, as discussed below. No
deliveries will be permitted on Sunday.
The site plan shows an area of landscaping adjacent to an overhead
loading door that is proposed to be removed for improved
circulation. However, an equivalent amount of landscaping should
000005
Honorable Planning Commission
April 20, 2004
Page 4
be installed elsewhere on the lot, subject to the approval of the
Community Development Director.
Outdoor Storage:
It has been staff's experience that warehousing /storage sometime
store inventory in the parking and loading areas, affecting not
only on -site circulation, but also aesthetics, street parking and
creating potential noise impacts upon local neighborhoods. A
Condition of Approval has been added prohibiting any outdoor
storage.
Hours of Operation:
Due to the adjacent residential neighborhood, hours of operation
are of concern. Hours of operation should be restricted so that
the adjacent residential neighborhood is not unnecessarily
inconvenienced. To that end, a Condition of Approval has been
added restricting the hours of operation. Hours of operation will
be limited to 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. Monday through Friday and 8:00
a.m. to 1:00 p.m. on Saturday. No operations will be permitted on
Sunday.
Findings
The following findings are offered for the Conditional Use Permit:
A. The proposed project is consistent with the intent and
provisions of the City's General Plan and any applicable
Specific Plan and this title, in that Goal 10 of the Land Use
Element of the General Plan is to "Encourage a diversity of
industrial uses which are located and designed in a compatible
manner surrounding land uses;
B. The proposed project is compatible with the character of
surrounding development in that the existing and surrounding
buildings were developed in anticipation of this type of use.
Conditions of Approval have been added to ensure that the
proposed project is compatible with the residential uses to
the east;
C. The proposed project would not be obnoxious or harmful, or
impair the utility of neighboring property or uses in that
Conditions of Approval have been added to mitigate effects of
on -site circulation, outdoor storage and to regulate hours of
operation;
D. The proposed project would not be detrimental to the public
interest, health, safety, convenience or welfare in that the
General Plan, Zoning and Industrial Planned Development
anticipated this type of use and Conditions of Approval have
been added to preserve the residential character of the
properties to the east;
000006
Honorable Planning Commission
April 20, 2004
Page 5
E. The proposed project is compatible with existing and planned
land uses in the general area where the development is to be
located; and
F. The proposed project is compatible with the scale, visual
character and design of the surrounding properties, designed
so as to enhance the physical and visual quality of the
community, and the structure(s) have design features which
provide visual relief and separation between land uses of
conflicting character in that the existing building and
industrial park were designed and developed with attention
given to the scale, visual character and design of the
surrounding properties.
PROCESSING TIME LIMITS
Time limits have been established fojr the processing of development
projects under the Permit Streamlining Act (Government Code Title
7, Division 1, Chapter 4.5), the Subdivision Map Act (Government
Code Title 7, Division 2), the California Environmental Quality Act
Statutes and Guidelines (Public Relsources Code Division 13, and
California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Chapter 3). Under the
applicable provisions of these regulations, the following timelines
have been established for action on'this project:
Date Application Deemed Complete: April 3, 2004
Planning Commission Action Deadline!: Not Applicable
City Council Action Deadline: June 3, 2004
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
In accordance with the City's environmental review procedures
adopted by resolution, the Community Development Director
determines the level of review necessary for a project to comply
with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Some
projects may be exempt from review based upon a specific category
listed in CEQA. Other projects may be exempt under a general rule
that environmental review is not necessary where it can be
determined that there would be no possibility of significant effect
upon the environment. A project which does not qualify for an
exemption requires the preparation of an Initial Study to assess
the level of potential environmental impacts.
The Director has reviewed this project and found it to be
Categorically Exempt in accordance with Section 15301 (Class 1.
Existing Facilities) of the California Code of Regulations (CEQA
Guidelines). No further environmental documentation is required.
000007
Honorable Planning Commission
April 20, 2004
Page 6
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
1. Open the public hearing, accept public testimony and close the
public hearing.
2. Adopt Resolution No. PC -2004-
Council conditional approval
2004 -01.
ATTACHMENTS:
recommending to the City
of Conditional Use Permit No.
1. Location Map
2. Site /Floor Plan
3. Draft PC Resolution with Conditions of Approval
1111
;i' : I
City of Moorpark
Planning Division
Location: 5316 Kazuko Court
000009
Location Map
(1000 Foot Radius)
AYE.
"
REYE &:ST.
AVE
V
i
I
i r
� �
� IPNERST
R"
_..
DtABLO AVE
0: ,
�'��
u,,
PALOMAR AVE.
t
Ix
HERTZ ` ST
LASSEI<'•
E
Q
O
CHALL LAGER CT
..
z
J
TEJADA ST.
w
SIERRA _.
a
_
- DISCOVERY CT,:
EVEREST
AV E
o,
o.
Q
=i
W
d
PC
ATTACHMENT 1
Ix
;i' : I
City of Moorpark
Planning Division
Location: 5316 Kazuko Court
000009
Location Map
(1000 Foot Radius)
W
W/
l.L..
V
r7
N
Q
Y
0
omk
N
o .
1�� Q
TREE
FIRE RISER PC ATTACHMENT 2
IOWNEe
5316
KAZUKO
L.L.C.
TENANT
WARREN
)ISTRIBUTING
INC
6737 DICE RD
SANTA FE
SPRINGS
CA 90670
0316 KAZUK0
Corny
DULUM 3
VAWMK
CA 93021
mall
�O
TM
Mfg err ww
10U m
PLAN VIEWS
is s -i
RESOLUTION NO. PC -2004-
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING TO THE
CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
NO. 2004 -04 TO ALLOW A WAREHOUSE /DISTRIBUTION
FACILITY IN AN EXISTING BUILDING IN THE M -1
(INDUSTRIAL PARK) ZONE, LOCATED AT 5316 KAZUKO
COURT, ON THE APPLICATION OF WARREN DISTRIBUTING
(ASSESSORS PARCEL NUMBER 511 -0- 070 -675)
WHEREAS, at a duly noticed public hearing on April 20,
2004, the Planning Commission considered Conditional Use Permit
(CUP) No. 2004 -04 on the application of Warren Distributing to
allow a warehouse /distribution facility in an existing building
in the M -1 (Industrial Park) zone, located at 5316 Kazuko Court.
(Assessor Parcel No. 511 -0- 070 -675); and
WHEREAS, at its meeting of April 20, 2004 the Planning
Commission considered the agenda report and any supplements
thereto and written public comments; opened the public hearing
and took and considered public testimony both for and against
the proposal; and on April 20, 2004 reached a decision on this
matter; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission concurs with the Community
Development Director's determination that this project is
Categorically Exempt from the provisions of CEQA pursuant to
Section 15301 as a Class 1 exemption for Existing Facilities.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
MOORPARK, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FINDINGS: Based upon the
information set forth in the staff report(s), accompanying
studies, and oral and written public testimony, the Planning
Commission makes the following findings in accordance with City
of Moorpark, Municipal Code Section 17.44.030:
A. The proposed project is consistent with the intent and
provisions of the city's general plan, and any applicable
specific plan and this title in that Goal 10 of the Land
Use Element of the General Plan is to "Encourage a
diversity of industrial uses which are located and designed
in a compatible manner surrounding land uses.;
\ \mor_pri_sery \City Share \Community Development \DEV PMTS \C U P \2004 \ -01 Warren Distributing\Reso-
Cond\040420.Reso.doc
PC ATTACHMENT 3 000011
Resolution No. PC -2004-
Page 2
B. The proposed project is compatible with the character of
surrounding development in that the existing and
surrounding buildings were developed in anticipation of
this type of use. Conditions of approval have been added
to ensure that the proposed project is compatible with the
residential uses to the east;
C. The proposed project would not be obnoxious or harmful, or
impair the utility of neighboring property or uses in that
conditions of approval have been added to mitigate effects
of on -site circulation and outdoor storage and to regulate
hours of operation;
D. The proposed project would not be detrimental to the public
interest, health, safety, convenience or welfare in that
the general plan, zoning and industrial planned development
anticipated this type of use and conditions of approval
have been added to preserve the residential character of
the properties to the east;
E. The proposed project is compatible with existing and
planned land uses in the general area where the development
is to be located; and
F. The proposed project is compatible with the scale, visual
character and design of the surrounding properties,
designed so as to enhance the physical and visual quality
of the community, and the structure(s) have design features
which provide visual relief and separation between land
uses of conflicting character in that the existing building
and industrial park were designed and developed with
attention given to the scale, visual character and design
of the surrounding properties.
SECTION 2. PLANNING COMMISSION
Planning Commission recommends to the
Conditional Use Permit No. 2004 -04
Conditions of Approval included in Exh
of Approval), attached hereto and
reference.
RECOMMENDATION: The
City Council approval of
subject to the special
ibit A (Special Conditions
incorporated herein by
SECTION 3. CERTIFICATION OF ADOPTION: The Community
Development Director shall certify to the adoption of this
resolution and shall cause a certified resolution to be filed in
the book of original resolutions.
000012
Resolution No. PC -2004-
Page 3
The action of the foregoing direction was approved by the
following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:
PASSED, AND ADOPTED this 20th day of April, 2004.
Scott Pozza, Chair
ATTEST:
Barry K. Hogan
Community Development Director
Exhibit A - Special and Standard Conditions of Approval
000013
Resolution No. PC -2004-
Page 4
EXHIBIT A
SPECIAL CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2004 -01
SPECIAL CONDITIONS
1. The development shall be in substantial conformance with
the plans presented in conjunction with the application for
Conditional Use Permit No. 2004 -01, except any
modifications as may be required to meet specific Code
standards or other conditions stipulated herein. _
2. All necessary permits shall be obtained from the Building
and Safety Department and all construction shall be in
compliance with the Moorpark Building Code and all other
applicable regulations.
3. Approval of a Zoning Clearance shall be required prior to
the issuance of building permits. All other permit and fee
requirements must be met.
4. All exterior areas of the site, including parking areas
under use by the facility, shall be maintained free of
litter and debris at all times.
5.
Operation and delivery hours will be
limited to 8:00 a.m.
to 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday,
and 8:00 a.m. to 1:00
p.m. on Saturday. No operations or
deliveries will be
permitted on Sunday.
6.
The "idling" time of delivery vehicles shall not exceed
five (5) minutes.
7.
Outdoor storage is prohibited.
8.
All landscaping shall be irrigated
and maintained in a
healthy and thriving condition, free
of weeds, trash and
debris.
9.
All exterior signs shall be under separate
permit.
10.
Exterior of building to be cleaned
and repainted, where
necessary.
11.
Should it be necessary to re- stripe
the parking lot and
remove any landscaped planters, an
equivalent amount of
landscaping shall be installed elsewhere on the lot,
subject to the approval of the
Community Development
Director.
000014
RESOLUTION NO. 2004-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
NO. 2004 -01 TO ALLOW A WAREHOUSE /DISTRIBUTION FACILITY
IN AN EXISTING BUILDING IN THE M -1 (INDUSTRIAL PARK)
ZONE, LOCATED AT 5316 KAZUKO COURT, ON THE APPLICATION
OF WARREN DISTRIBUTING (ASSESSORS PARCEL NUMBER 511 -0-
070 -675)
WHEREAS, on April 20, 2004, the Planning Commission adopted
Resolution No. PC- 2003 -458 recommending approval to the City
Council of Conditional Use Permit (CUP) No. 2004 -01 on the
application of Warren Distributing to allow a
warehouse /distribution facility in an existing building in the
M -1 (Industrial Park) zone, located at 5316 Kazuko Court.
(Assessor Parcel No. 511 -0- 070 -675); and
WHEREAS, at duly noticed public hearings on May 19, 2004,
the City Council considered the agenda report for Conditional
Use Permit (CUP) No. 2004 -01; opened the public hearing and took
and considered public testimony; closed the public hearing; and
reached a decision on this matter; and
WHEREAS, the City Council concurs with the Community
Development Director's determination that this project is
Categorically Exempt from the provisions of CEQA pursuant to
Section 15301 as a Class 1 exemption for Existing Facilities.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FINDINGS: Based upon the
information set forth in the staff report(s), accompanying
studies, and oral and written public testimony, the City Council
makes the following findings in accordance with City of
Moorpark, Municipal Code Section 17.44.030:
A. The proposed project is consistent with the intent and
provisions of the city's general plan, and any applicable
specific plan and this title in that Goal 10 of the Land
Use Element of the General Plan is to "Encourage a
diversity of industrial uses which are located and designed
in a compatible manner surrounding land uses.;
B. The proposed project is compatible with the character of
surrounding development in that the existing and
surrounding buildings were developed in anticipation of
CC ATTACHMENT 2 000015
Resolution No. 2004-
Page 2
this type of use. Conditions of approval have been added
to ensure that the proposed project is compatible with the
residential uses to the east;
C. The proposed project would not be obnoxious or harmful, or
impair the utility of neighboring property or uses in that
conditions of approval have been added to mitigate effects
of on -site circulation and outdoor storage and to regulate
hours of operation;
D. The proposed project would not be detrimental to the public
interest, health, safety, convenience or welfare in that
the general plan, zoning and industrial planned development
anticipated this type of use and conditions of approval
have been added to preserve the residential character of
the properties to the east;
E. The proposed project is compatible with existing and
planned land uses in the general area where the development
is to be located; and
F. The proposed project is compatible with the scale, visual
character and design of the surrounding properties,
designed so as to enhance the physical and visual quality
of the community, and the structure (s) have design features
which provide visual relief and separation between land
uses of conflicting character in that the existing building
and industrial park were designed and developed with
attention given to the scale, visual character and design
of the surrounding properties.
SECTION 2. CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL: The City Council
approves Conditional Use Permit (CUP) No. 2004 -01, subject to
the Special Conditions of Approval included in Exhibit A
(Special Conditions of Approval), attached hereto and
incorporated herein by reference.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 19th day of May, 2004.
Patrick Hunter, Mayor
ATTEST:
Deborah S. Traffenstedt, City Clerk
Exhibit A - Special Conditions of Approval
000016
Resolution No. 2004 -
Page 3
EXHIBIT A
SPECIAL CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2004 -01
1. The development shall be in substantial conformance with
the plans presented in conjunction with the application for
Conditional Use Permit No. 2004 -01, except any
modifications as may be required to meet specific Code
standards or other conditions stipulated herein.
2. All necessary permits shall be obtained from the Building
and Safety Department and all construction shall be in
compliance with the Moorpark Building Code and all other
applicable regulations.
3. Approval of a Zoning Clearance shall be required prior to
the issuance of building permits. All other permit and fee
requirements must be met.
4. All exterior areas of the site, including parking areas
under use by the facility, shall be maintained free of
litter and debris at all times.
5.
Operation and delivery hours will be
limited to 8:00 a.m.
to 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday,
and 8:00 a.m. to 1:00
p.m. on Saturday. No operations or
deliveries will be
permitted on Sunday.
6.
The `idling" time of delivery vehicles shall not exceed
five (5) minutes.
7.
Outdoor storage is prohibited.
8.
All landscaping shall be irrigated
and maintained in a
healthy and thriving condition, free
of weeds, trash and
debris.
9.
All exterior signs shall be under separate
permit.
10.
Exterior of building to be cleaned
and repainted, where
necessary.
11.
Should it be necessary to re- stripe
the parking lot and
remove any landscaped planters, an
equivalent amount of
landscaping shall be installed elsewhere on the lot,
subject to the approval of the
Community Development
Director.
-End-
00001'