HomeMy WebLinkAboutAGENDA REPORT 2004 0519 CC REG ITEM 10CTO:
FROM:
DATE:
MOORPARK CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA REPORT
The Honorable City Council
aoOA{
Mary K. Lindley, Director of Community Servicesl�/
May 13, 2004 (CC Meeting of May 19, 2004)
SUBJECT: Consider Resolution Approving the Preliminary
Assessment Engineer's Report, the Parks and Recreation
Maintenance and Improvement Assessment District Levy
Amount, and Setting the Date for the Public Hearing
for June 2, 2004
SUMMARY
The City Council is being asked to adopt the attached
resolution, approving the Assessment Engineer's Report (provided
under separate cover), which contains the methodology and
formula for apportioning the property assessment. Additionally,
the resolution identifies the date for the Public Hearing to
consider the levy of the assessment for FY 2004/05.
BACKGROUND
In July 1999, the City successfully established an assessment
district for the maintenance and improvement of City parks. The
District was initiated by the Council to provide funding in
place of AD 85 -1 (Park Maintenance Assessment District) , which
was disbanded in July 1998 as a result of Proposition 218. The
current Maintenance District is based on a "special" assessment.
This means that the City assesses property owners for that
portion of park maintenance and improvement activities that
generate a "special" benefit. All activities that generate a
"general" benefit must be funded from non - assessment revenues
(typically General Fund and Park Improvement Fund).
The Park Maintenance and Improvement Assessment District
includes 15 improved parks and one undeveloped park located at
M:\MLindley\Assessment Dist \engineer report 2 2004 05 ccagd.doc
000117 C
Honorable City Council
May 19, 2004
Page 2
the southwest corner of Magnolia Street and Charles Street. The
amount of the assessment levied to property owners may only
increase by the Cost of Living factor (CPI) for the Los Angeles
Metropolitan area, and not more than 3 percent in any year. In
situations when the CPI exceeds 3 percent, the remaining
difference can be carried over to a subsequent year.
On February 4, 2004, the City Council adopted Resolution No.
2004 -2167 indicating its intent to continue the assessment for
FY 2004/05 and directing the preparation of the Engineer's
Report. On that date, the City selected Shilts Consultants to
prepare the report.
DISCUSSION
The City Council is being presented with the preliminary
Engineer's Report for consideration and approval. By approving
the Engineer's Report, the Council will be establishing the
assessment rate, the formula used to spread the assessment, and
the City's contribution (comprised of General Fund and Park
Improvement Fund [PIF]) for the maintenance and improvement of
parks. The boundaries for the Parks and Recreation Maintenance
and Improvement District contain all properties within the
City's incorporated limits.
The Assessment District includes all existing 15 City parks,
Arroyo Vista Community Center, and the Serenata Trail. The
Engineer's Report contains a determination regarding the
percentage of benefit deemed "special" and the percentage deemed
"general ", generated from the maintenance and improvement of
City parks and recreation facilities. The percentage figure
identified by the Engineer is 25 percent "general" benefit and
75 percent "special" benefit. This percentage is then applied to
the total park maintenance budget. Under Proposition 218, the
City can only assess property owners for the 75 percent portion
of the budget related to "special" benefits. Although 75 percent
is identified as providing "special" benefit, and consistent
with previous years, it is proposed that property owners be
assessed for only approximately 28 percent of the total park
maintenance budget, which is only a third of the special benefit
costs. Appropriations from the General Fund, Park Improvement
Fund, Park Bonds and other City funding sources will comprise
M: \MLindley \Assessment Dist \engineer report 2 2004 05 ccagd.doc
000177
Honorable City Council
May 19, 2004
Page 3
the remaining approximate 72 percent to the total budget for FY
04/05.
Additionally, the Report identifies all properties in Moorpark
by type. A value has been assigned for each type of property,
with single family residential having a value of 1.00. A value
for all other property types is assigned based on the SFE. The
equivalent value is based on a formula that uses the average
number of people who could potentially live on, work at, or
otherwise use a property. Specifically, the Engineer finds SFE
values as follows:
Single Family Residential 1.00
Condominium
•80
Multi - Family Residential
.78
Mobile Homes
.65
Commercial
.70
Office
1.90
Shopping Center
.70
Industrial
.70
Self Storage or Parking Lot
.03
(per dwelling unit)
,N NN
AN \\
AN AN
(per 1/5 of acre)
AN AN
AN \\
\\ AN
AN AN
In regards to undeveloped vacant property, the Engineer has
developed a three - tiered rate structure. Vacant property will be
assessed at .25 of its equivalent SFE (for residential,
industrial, commercial, etc.). Once a development application
and engineering plans have been submitted for vacant property,
it will be assessed at its SFE at a rate of .35 of the developed
rate, and vacant property for which development has been
approved will have a SFE equivalent of .65 of the developed rate
for that property type until fully developed.
Park Maintenance and Improvement Budget
The Engineer's Report addresses the estimated revenue to be
generated by the assessment (approximately $551,900) if the
assessment rate is approved as recommended. This is
approximately $16,000 more in assessment revenue than was
anticipated for FY 2003/04. The report also identifies the non -
assessment contribution, which is noted in the Report as City
Contribution (General Fund and Park Improvement Fund).
Consistent with Proposition 218, the City covers all costs
M: \MLindley \Assessment Dist \engineer report 2 2004 05 ccagd.doc
OOOJL78
Honorable City Council
May 19, 2004
Page 4
associated with park maintenance activity expenditures that
generate "general" benefits (these activities comprise
approximately 25 percent of the budget) . Additionally, the City
traditionally covers a significant portion of the cost
associated with expenditures that generate "special" benefits.
The remaining costs associated with "special" benefits are
covered by the revenue collected from the assessed levy.
The proposed FY 2004/05 Park Assessment District budget figure
of $2,502,806 includes $1,393,379 for operation and maintenance
and $1,109,427 for capital improvements.
FY 2004/05 Park Asst.
District Budget Summary
Proposed
Expenditures
Proposed
Funding
Operation /Maintenance
$1,393,379
Capital Park Projects
$1,109,427
Total Expenditure Budget
$2,502,806
Assessment Levy
$551,900
General Fund
$841,497
Park Improvement
Fund /Endowment /Park Bond
$1,109,409
Total Revenues
$2,5021806
The budget figures contained in the Engineer's Report differ
slightly from the figures in the budget document that will be
adopted by the Council. However, the differences between the two
budgets will not effect the assessment levy.
Assessment Rate
The assessment district was adopted with a CPI cap of 3 percent.
However, the approved assessment language allows the City to
carry over any difference in the CPI that exceeds 3 percent to
the following year, as long as it adheres to the cap in
subsequent years. The history of the adjusted assessment levy is
as follows:
M: \MLindley \Assessment Dist \engineer report 2 2004 05 ccagd.doc
000IL 79
Honorable City Council
May 19, 2004
Page 5
Fiscal
CIP Period
CIP
Levy
Carryover
Year
Adjustment
Adjustment
2000/01
Dec 1998 -
2.30
2.30
0
Dec 1999
2001/02
Dec 1999 -
3.70
.7%
.7%
Dec 2000
2002/03
Dec 2000 -
2.10
2.80
0
Dec 2001
2003/04
Dec 2001 -
3.70
30
.7%
Dec 2002
2004/05
Dec 2002 -
1.8%
2.5%
0
Dec 2003
The CPI increase calculation pertaining to the FY 2004/05
assessment (December 2002 - December 2003) is 1.8 percent.
Combined with the .7 percent carryover from last fiscal year,
the total amount of the eligible CPI increase is 2.5 percent,
setting the assessment levy at $44.60.
This proposed SFE rate adjustment is reflected in the Engineer's
Report along with the proposed FY 2004/05 Budget. In summary,
based on this action, the City's total non - assessment
contribution would be $1,950,906, of which $841,497 would come
from the General Fund and $1,109,409 from the other City funding
sources including the Park Improvement Fund, Park Bond and the
Endowment Fund. This leaves the total contribution from the Park
and Recreation Assessment at $551,900, equal to the anticipated
revenue. This represents a ratio of 72 percent City funded and
28 percent assessment levy funded.
Public Hearing
The continuation of the Parks Maintenance and Improvement
District and rate adjustment requires a public hearing to be
held prior to the annual levy of assessment for the purpose of
receiving input and to hear any protest to the proposed
assessment. Staff recommends that the Council set the hearing
date as June 2, 2004. The Hearing Notice cites the assessment
amounts set forth in the Engineer's Report and it will be
published and posted as required by law.
M: \MLindley \Assessment Dist \engineer report 2 2004 05 ccagd.doc
Honorable City Council
May 19, 2004
Page 6
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Adopt Resolution No. 2004-
Attachment: A - Resolution
M: \MLindley \Assessment Dist \engineer report 2 2004 05 ccagd.doc
000181
ATTACHMENT A
RESOLUTION NO. 2004 -
A RESOLUTION OF INTENTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA TO LEVY
ASSESSMENTS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2004 -05,
PRELIMINARILY APPROVING ENGINEER'S REPORT,
AND PROVIDING FOR NOTICE OF HEARING FOR THE
PARKS AND RECREATION MAINTENANCE AND
IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK
WHEREAS, on July 15, 1999, by its Resolution No. 99 -1625,
after receiving a weighted majority of ballots in support of the
proposed assessment, this Council ordered the formation of and
levied the first assessment within the City of Moorpark Parks and
Recreation Maintenance and Improvement District (the "Assessment
District ") pursuant to the provisions of Article XIIID of the
California Constitution, and the Landscaping and Lighting Act of
1972 (the "Act "), Part 2 of Division 15 of the California Streets
and Highways Code (commencing with Section 22500 thereof); and
WHEREAS, by Resolution No. 2004 -2167, the City Council
ordered the preparation of an Engineer's Report for the Parks and
Recreation Maintenance and Improvement District (the "District ")
for fiscal year 2004 -05; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to said Resolution, the Engineer's Report
was prepared by Shilts Consultants, Inc., Engineer of Work, in
accordance with 22565, et. seq., of the Streets and Highways Code
(the "Report ") and Article XIIID of the California Constitution;
and
WHEREAS, said Engineer's Report was filed with the City Clerk
and the City Council has reviewed the Report and wishes to take
certain actions relative to said Report.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK,
CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. The Report for "PARKS AND RECREATION
MAINTENANCE AND IMPROVEMENT ASSESSMENT DISTRICT ", on file with the
City Clerk, has been duly considered by the Moorpark City Council
and is hereby deemed sufficient and approved. The Report shall
stand as the Engineer's Report for all subsequent proceedings
under, and pursuant to, the foregoing resolution.
Page 1 of 3
000182
SECTION 2. It is the intention of this Council to levy
and collect assessments within the Assessment District for fiscal
year 2004 -05. Within the Assessment District, the existing and
proposed improvements, and any substantial changes proposed to be
made to the existing improvements, are generally described as the
installation, maintenance and servicing of public facilities,
including but not limited to, landscaping, sprinkler systems, park
grounds, park facilities, landscape corridors, ground cover,
shrubs and trees, street frontages, playground equipment and
hardcourt areas, senior and community centers, drainage systems,
lighting, fencing, entry monuments, basketball courts, tennis
courts, running tracks, other recreational facilities, security
guards, graffiti removal and repainting, and labor, materials,
supplies, utilities and equipment, as applicable, for property
owned and maintained by the City of Moorpark. Installation means
the construction of recreational improvements, including, but not
limited to, land preparation, such as grading, leveling, cutting
and filling, sod, landscaping, irrigation systems, sidewalks and
drainage, lights, playground equipment, play courts, recreational
facilities and public restrooms. Maintenance means the furnishing
of services and materials for the ordinary and usual maintenance,
operation and servicing of said improvements, including repair,
removal, or replacement of all or part of any improvement;
providing for the life, growth, health and beauty of landscaping;
and cleaning, sandblasting and painting of walls and other
improvements to remove or cover graffiti. Servicing means the
furnishing of electric current or energy for the operation or
lighting of any improvements, and water for irrigation of any
landscaping or the maintenance of any other improvements.
SECTION 3. The Assessment District consists of the lots and
parcels shown on the boundary map of the Assessment District on
file with the City Clerk, and reference is hereby made to such map
for further particulars.
SECTION 4. Reference is hereby made to the Engineer's Report
for a full and detailed description of the improvements, the
boundaries of the Assessment District and the proposed assessments
upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the Assessment
District. The Engineer's Report identifies all parcels which will
have a special benefit conferred upon them and upon which an
assessment will be imposed.
SECTION 5. The authorized maximum assessment rate for the
Assessment District includes an annual adjustment by an amount
equal to the annual change in the Los Angeles Consumer Price
Index, not to exceed 3% per year. The authorized annual
adjustment for fiscal year 2004 -05 is 2.50, which is equal to the
Page 2 of 3
000183
change in the Los Angeles Consumer Price Index from December 2002
to December 2003 plus unused CPI changes from previous fiscal
year assessments in excess of the 3.0o maximum annual adjustment.
Including the authorized annual adjustment, the maximum
authorized assessment rate for fiscal year 2004 -05 is $44.60 per
single family equivalent benefit unit and the proposed fiscal
year 2004 -05 assessment rate per single family equivalent benefit
unit is $44.60.
SECTION 6. Notice is hereby given that on June 2, 2004, at
the hour of 7:00 o'clock p.m. in the Council Chambers, located at
799 Moorpark Avenue, Moorpark, California 93021, the Council will
hold a public hearing to consider the ordering of the improvements
and the levy of the proposed assessments.
SECTION 7. Prior to the conclusion of the hearing, any
interested person may file a written protest with the City Clerk,
or, having previously filed a protest, may file a written
withdrawal of that protest. A written protest shall state all
grounds of objection. A protest by a property owner shall contain
a description sufficient to identify the property owned by such
owner. Such protest or withdrawal of protest should be mailed to
Shilts Consultants, Inc., 2300 Boynton Ave., Suite 201, Fairfield,
CA 94533.
SECTION 8. The City Clerk shall cause a notice of the
hearing to be given by publishing a copy of this resolution once,
at least ten (10) days prior to the date of the hearing above
specified, in a newspaper circulated in the City of Moorpark.
SECTION 9. The City
adoption of this resolution
resolution to be filed in the
Clerk shall certify to the
and shall cause a certified
book of original resolutions.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 19th day of May, 2004.
Patrick Hunter, Mayor
ATTEST:
Deborah S. Traffenstedt, City Clerk
Page 3 of 3
111 :•