Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
AGENDA REPORT 2004 0707 CC REG ITEM 09A
ITEM °I . A . MOORPARK CITY COUNCIL] AGENDA REPORT G1'c,Qc sue. roc c 0 104,W TO: Honorable City Council xc`' e. ay: A� FROM: Barry K. Hogan, Community Development Directo Prepared By: Scott Wolfe, Principal Planner DATE: June 24, 2004 (CC Meeting of 7/7/2004) SUBJECT: Consider a Resolution Establishing Landscape Design Standards and Guidelines BACKGROUND /DISCUSSION On June 2, 2004, the City Council was scheduled to discuss an agenda item pertaining to the adoption of a resolution establishing Landscape Design Standards and Guidelines. This item was continued to the City Council's July 7, 2004 meeting, to allow Council members additional time to review the document. The previous staff report and draft resolution accompany this report. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Adopt Resolution No. 2004- establishing Landscape Design Standards and Guidelines. ATTACHMENTS: 1. City Council 6/2/2004 Agenda Report (without attachments) 2. Planning Commission 4/6/2004 Agenda Report (without attachments) 3. Draft Resolution 2004- S: \Community Development \DEV PMTS \Z 0 A \2002 \Landscape Guidelines \cc agenda report - cont.doc 0 00 097 MOORPARK CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT TO: Honorable City Council FROM: Barry K. Hogan, Community Development Director Prepared By: Scott Wolfe, Principal Planner DATE: May 19, 2004 (CC Meeting of 6/2/04) SUBJECT: Consider a Resolution Establishing Landscape Design Standards and Guidelines BACKGROUND For several years, the City Council has included on its list of Council Goals, the development and adoption of Design Guidelines for Landscaping and Irrigation. On April 3, 2002, the City Manager entered into an agreement with the City's Landscape Consultant, Jeremy Laurentowski of Professional Design Inc., to draft these Guidelines. Currently, City staff relies upon outdated guidelines from the County of Ventura for much of its landscape review. This has made the process difficult for developers, as there is no formal document which establishes standards and guidelines for landscaping and irrigation systems. A draft set of standards and guidelines has been drafted by the Landscape Consultant, revised and presented by staff, and reviewed by the Planning Commission. A copy of the Agenda Report to the Planning Commission is attached. On May 4, 2004, the Planning Commission recommended to the City Council adoption of these draft standards and guidelines. DISCUSSION Staff has worked with the City's Landscape Architect to develop standards and guidelines that address common issues within the City. A document has been prepared which presents these standards and guidelines in a manner that makes them useful to City staff and property owners alike. This document would apply to all new development projects, as well as modifications to S: \Community Development \DEV PMTS \Z O A \2002 \Landscape Guidelines \cc agenda report.doc CC ATTACHMENT 1 000098 Honorable City Council June 2, 2004 Page 2 existing projects, with the exception of entitlement applications for individual single- family houses. It addresses general landscape policies, planting and irrigation requirements for various types of developments, forms for use in the landscape design review process, planting lists, and standard plates illustrating proper planting and irrigation techniques. The draft document was originally scheduled for Planning Commission consideration on April 6, 2004. Due to very full schedules, the item was continued to subsequent meetings, and May 4, 2004, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. PC- 2004 -460, recommending approval of the document, subject to suggested revisions. In addition to emphasizing the need to exclude individual single family residences from adherence to the standards and guidelines, the Planning Commission requested that the document also express the intent that existing Homeowners Associations are not affected by these guidelines as well, unless there is a major revision to the development they serve. Statements expressing these intentions have been added to the document. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION The adoption of Landscape Design Standards and Guidelines is considered to be a "project" under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), requiring an appropriate level of environmental review. In accordance with the City's environmental review procedures adopted by resolution, the Community Development Director determines the level of review necessary for a project to comply with CEQA. Some projects may be exempt from review based upon a specific category listed in CEQA. other projects may be exempt under a general rule that environmental review is not necessary where it can be determined that there would be no possibility of a significant effect upon the environment. A project which does not qualify for an exemption requires the preparation of an Initial Study to assess the level of potential environmental impacts. The Director has reviewed this project and found it to qualify for a General Rule Exemption in accordance with Section 15061 of California Code of Regulations (CEQA Guidelines). The standards and guidelines do not mandate any design that would pose a significant adverse environmental effect. Effects of the 000099 Honorable City Council June 2, 2004 Page 3 landscaping design can only be properly evaluated on a project - by- project basis when landscaping plans are submitted. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Adopt Resolution No. 2004- establishing Landscape Design Standards and Guidelines. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Planning Commission 4/6/2004 Agenda Report (without attachments) 2. Draft Resolution 2004- 000100 MOORPARK PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT TO: Honorable Planning Commission FROM: Barry K. Hogan, Community Development Director Prepared by Scott Wolfe, Principal Planner DATE: March 17, 2004 (PC Meeting of 04/06/04) SUBJECT: Consider Recommendation to City Council on Landscape Design Standards and Guidelines BACKGROUND As part of the annual City Council Goals and Objectives, the City Council has identified, for the past several years, the need to adopt guidelines for preparation of landscape and irrigation plans. This goal is currently listed as item number F -8 on the list of departmental goals and objectives. In support of this Goal of the City Council, Community Development staff has worked with the City's Landscape Consultant to develop a series of standards and guidelines to ensure that the landscaping of new development projects, as well as, that of public facilities and streetscapes, is designed to achieve the desired outcome at maturity. DISCUSSION The attached document represents a comprehensive program for the implementation of landscape design policies and regulations which are already in existence within the City today. The benefits to be gained from these Landscape Design Standards and Guidelines will be realized by both City staff, as well as, by private land owners and developers, through the clear communication of expectations and standards pertaining to the installation and maintenance of landscaping and irrigation systems. The Landscape Design Standards and Guidelines begin with general information which pertains to all projects in the City. This information identifies points of concern which should be considered when designing the landscape and irrigation plans for any project. S: \Community Development \DEV PMTS \Z O A \2002 \Landscape Guidelines \PC Agenda Report.doc CC ATTACHMENT 2 000101 Honorable Planning Commission April 6, 2004 Page 2 Issues such as water conservation, fire hazard mitigation, public accessibility, and development of community character are addressed in a very general way, so that landscape designers can understand these concerns before considerable time is expended in design. Landscape Plan submittal requirements and processing procedures constitute the next portion of the document. These sections establish standards for submittals and outline the general processing steps to enable applicants to navigate their way through the Landscape Plan review process as easily and expeditiously as possible. The procedures and requirements sections address the format of plans, the content of submittals, and the process from the time of submittal to the final inspection of landscaping and irrigation and the release of sureties. Next, the Landscape Design Standards and Guidelines identify design standards to be used for different types of projects. These project types range from public concerns such as streetscapes to private developments. Separate requirements exist for single - family residential projects, as well as, commercial and industrial projects, and treatments of utilities. Parking areas have their own requirements in the document as well. Finally, the Standards and Guidelines provide a series of aids to applicants designing and submitting plans to the City. Applications and other forms are included in the "Attachments to the Standards and Guidelines." Other helpful information is included, such as plant lists, submittal requirements, and standard details for the installation of plant materials and irrigation equipment. It should be noted that these Standards and Guidelines are intended to provide direction to applicants and guidance to staff in processing requests for landscape approval on public projects, and private commercial, industrial, institutional and residential projects. The Standards and Guidelines are not, however, intended to dictate planting requirements for individual private residential properties. While the plant lists and planting methods included in the document may prove useful to homeowners, they are not to be enforced as the only list of plants or methods acceptable to the City. Homeowners will retain their own freedom to design the landscapes on their property, subject only to property maintenance provisions of the Municipal Code and individual Homeowners Association regulations. Many of the provisions of the Standards and Guidelines use mandatory language ( "shall ") rather than directory language 000:102 Honorable Planning Commission April 6, 2004 Page 3 ( "should ") , which is not typically true of "Guidelines." The provisions using the mandatory language are Standards to be adhered to in all instances, while the provisions with directory language are Guidelines. This fact should be viewed in light of the intent that these Guidelines be adopted as general policies, which set direction and guide both staff and applicants in the accomplishment of the goal of ensuring a pleasant and livable community, enriched with desired landscape amenities. However, in some instances, there may be situations which are better addressed by a practice which may not strictly adhere to the guidelines set forth in the document. In those situations, the Community Development Director may adjust the guidelines to best meet the needs of the City. The Commission should be aware that the Director's ability to adjust provisions in the Standards and Guidelines does not extend to those mandatory items that require compliance with other City, State, or Federal requirements, such as Title 24, the Americans with Disabilities Act, and local health and safety requirements. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION The adoption of Landscape Design Standards and Guidelines is considered to be a "project" under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), requiring an appropriate level of environmental review. In accordance with the City's environmental review procedures adopted by resolution, the Community Development Director determines the level of review necessary for a project to comply with CEQA. Some projects may be exempt from review based upon a specific category listed in CEQA. Other projects may be exempt under a general rule that environmental review is not necessary where it can be determined that there would be no possibility of a significant effect upon the environment. A project which does not qualify for an exemption requires the preparation of an Initial Study to assess the level of potential environmental impacts. Based upon the results of an Initial Study, the Director may determine that a project will not have a significant effect upon the environment. In such a case, a Notice of Intent to Adopt a Negative Declaration or a Mitigated Negative Declaration is prepared. For many projects, a Negative Declaration or Mitigated Negative Declaration will prove to be sufficient environmental documentation. If the Director determines that a project has the potential for significant adverse impacts and adequate mitigation cannot be readily identified, an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) is prepared. The Director has reviewed this project and found it to qualify for a General Rule Exemption in accordance with Section 15061 of 000103 Honorable Planning Commission April 6, 2004 Page 4 California Code of Regulations (CEQA Guidelines). No further environmental documentation is required. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Adopt Resolution No. PC -2004- recommending to the City Council adoption of Landscape Design Standards and Guidelines. ATTACHMENT: Draft Resolution PC -2004- 000104 RESOLUTION NO. 2004- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING LANDSCAPE DESIGN STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES WHEREAS, the City Council has identified the need to establish a uniform policy for the design of landscaping for development projects within the City in its Goals and Objectives for Fiscal Year 2003/2004; and WHEREAS, Landscape Design Standards and Guidelines have been developed to meet that need; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, at its meeting of May 4, 2004, adopted Resolution No. PC- 2004 -460, recommending approval of these Standards and Guidelines; and WHEREAS, the City Council concurs Development Director's determination that Standards and Guidelines are exempt from under the California Environmental Quality general rule that CEQA only applies to pro significant effect on the environment. with the Community the Landscape Design environmental review Act (CEQA) under the j ects that may have a NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. ADOPTION OF GUIDELINES: In recognition of the desire of the City to both regulate landscape design within the City and provide useful information on the City's requirements to the public, the City of Moorpark hereby adopts the Landscape Design Standards and Guidelines, attached hereto as Exhibit A. SECTION 2. CERTIFICATION OF ADOPTION: certify to the adoption of this resolution certified resolution to be filed in th resolutions. The City Clerk shall and shall cause a e book of original CC ATTACHMENT 3 000105 Resolution No. 2004 - Page 2 PASSED AND ADOPTED this 7th day of July, 2004. Patrick Hunter, Mayor ATTEST: Deborah S. Traffenstedt, City Clerk Attachment: Exhibit A - Landscape Design Standards and Guidelines O00106 Resolution No. PC -2004- Page 3 LANDSCAPE DESIGN STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES CITY OF MOORPARK Community Development Department 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark, CA 93021 805 - 517 -6224 000107 Resolution No. PC -2004- Page 4 TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION 1 GENERAL INFORMATION 1.1 Water Conservation 1.2 Ecological Viability 1.3 Development of Community Character 1.4 Public Access and Enjoyment 1.5 Fire Mitigation SECTION 2 PROCESSING PROCEDURES 2.1 Pre - Submittal Meeting 2.2 Conceptual Landscape Package Submittal 2.3 Conceptual Plan Review and Approval 2.4 Guarantee /Surety and Exoneration of Surety 2.5 Installation and Inspection 2.6 Enforcement SECTION 3 PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS 3.1 Plan Check Fees 3.2 General Plan Preparation Requirements 3.3 Planting Plan Requirements 3.4 Soils Analysis 3.5 Irrigation Plan Requirements 3.6 Maintenance Program SECTION 4 INSTALLATION VERIFICATION 4.1 Approved Plans /Conditions 4.2 Landscape Condition Compliance Review 4.3 Maintenance Program SECTION 5 INSTALLATION ENFORCEMENT SECTION 6 WATER BUDGET AND PROJECTED WATER USE CALCULATIONS SECTION 7 PUBLIC RIGHT -OF -WAY 7.1 Parkways and Streetscapes 7.2 Median Island Planting Requirements SECTION 8 COMMERCIAL, INDUSTRIAL AND MULTI - FAMILY PROJECTS SECTION 9 UTILITIES SECTION 10 PARKING AREAS SECTION 11 EROSION CONTROL AND NATURAL AREAS SECTION 12 RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENTS 12.1 Water Efficient Model Home Requirement 12.2 Private Front Yards 12.3 Street Trees 12.4 Streetscape Concept 12.5 Wall and Fencing OOOJ 08 Resolution No. PC -2004- Page 5 ATTACHMENTS: I LANDSCAPE SUBMITTAL PLAN CHECKLIST • General Plan Requirements • Slope Planting Plan Requirements • On -Site Planting Plan Requirements • Irrigation Plan Requirements • Landscape Inspection Requirements (City Maintained and Master Association) • Landscape Inspection Requirements (Sub- Association, Commercial and On -Site Areas) • City Approval Block (must be on title sheet) II GENERAL RECOMMENDED PLANT LIST III INVASIVE AND PROHIBITED PLANT LIST IV RECOMMENDED TREES FOR STREETS V REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT FOR LANDSCAPE PLAN REIVEW VI APPLICANT'S LANDSCAPE CONSULTANT'S CHECKLIST AND CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE VII CITY STANDARD PLANTING DETAILS (PLATES 1 -1 THROUGH 1 -5) 1 -1 Tree Planting Detail 1 -2 Tree Guying Detail 1 -3 Tree Planting on Slope Detail 1 -4 Shrub Planting Detail 1 -5 Shrub on Slope Planting Detail VIII CITY STANDARD IRRIGATION DETAILS 2 -1 Remote Control Valve Detail 2 -2 Anti - siphon Valve Detail 2 -3 Backflow Preventer Detail 2 -4 Bubbler Detail 2 -5 Pop -up Rotor Detail 2 -6 Rotor On Slope Detail 2 -7 Pop -up Spray Head Detail 2 -8 Riser Spray Detail IX PLANTING DESIGN REQUIREMENT FIGURES 12 -1 Slope Planting w /View Fence (Elevation) 12 -2 Slope Planting w /Screen Wall (Elevation) 12 -3 Slope Planting at Single - Family Residence (Plan View) 12 -4 Slope Planting a Multi - Family Residence (Plan View) 000109 Resolution No. PC -2004- Page 6 SECTION 1 GENERAL The purpose of this guide is to assist in the preparation of landscape plans while incorporating water conservation measures, design aesthetics and landscape consistency throughout the City of Moorpark. It has been prepared by the City of Moorpark Community Development Department as a guide for use by landscape architects and others involved with the development of projects within the City. These standards and guidelines include water use requirements and the City's minimum landscape standards established to create a sense of community character. The landscape plans must meet the basic criteria within these standards and guidelines. Items which utilize mandatory language ( "shall ") are considered standards and must be adhered to. Additionally, certain projects may be required to exceed the minimum standards to achieve specific objectives. The items which utilize directory language ( "should ") are considered guidelines, and may be interpreted with some flexibility to meet goals which result in community benefit. These Guidelines and Standards are not intended to apply to projects involving an individual Single Family Detached residence, and it is not the intent of the City to impose these requirements upon Homeowners Associations already in existence at the time of the adoption of these Guidelines and Standards. The Community Development Director may waive any guidelines as deemed necessary and appropriate. 1.1 Water Conservation Water conservation through landscaping offers the greatest single opportunity for water savings in the urban area. About forty percent (40 %) of urban water is used to irrigate landscaped areas in California. A water - efficient landscape includes water efficient (drought tolerant) plants, efficient irrigation systems, proper soil preparation, responsive maintenance and watering schedules, and reuse of water (wherever possible) such as grey water, reclaimed or recycled water systems. Water- efficient design can both reduce project costs and reduce the amount of water usage for landscaping. Due to the increasing demand for water and the limited supply in Ventura County and within the City of Moorpark, water - efficient landscaping shall be required in new developments and existing developments undergoing significant modifications. Included within these standards and guidelines are Water Budget and Projected Water Use Calculations as well as a list of City approved plants and their suggested landscape use. The applicant may expand upon the material list with approval by the Community Development Director, but all suggestions must meet the basic criteria within the standards and guidelines, including: Drought tolerant planting; • Limitation of lawn areas; • Efficient irrigation; Proper soil preparation, including use of mulch • Responsive maintenance and watering schedule; • Use of surfaces that allow percolation of stormwater, such as turfcrete, gravel, porous pavements, vegetative groundcover, mulch, etc; • Surface drainage through bioswales; and Stormwater storage for reuse onsite, such as cisterns. 000110 Resolution No. PC -2004- Page 7 1.2 Ecological Viability The landscape plans should incorporate sensible conservation of public resources, including water, soil, biodiversity, energy resources, air quality, agricultural, recreational and wildlife open space, and other such resources in the public interest. Judicious conservation is cost - effective in both project construction and maintenance. Landscape plans that incorporate conservation also integrate with the character of the City's community and environs. The applicant is encouraged to take full advantage of the wide range of possibilities in design and technology within the framework established by this guide. A list of invasive and prohibited plants is provided (Attachment III). The Community Development Director or his /her designee may allow usage of select plants on this list in landscape areas that do not interface with sensitive ecological zones. Methods of increasing ecological viability include: • Reduced disturbance of soil and natural terrain through minimizing grading and working with the natural topography as much as possible; • Narrower road design and layouts with shorter road lengths, to reduce infrastructure costs and impermeable surfaces, as well as to increase opportunity to conserve natural resources, viewsheds and other space- requiring amenities in newly developed areas; • Native topsoil conservation and renewal, by saving topsoil and replacing it after grading, by re- vegetating with native plants, and other landscape regeneration methods; • Minimization of runoff via on -site stormwater retention /infiltration through open - bottom and vegetated swales and /or detention /retention basins, and other aesthetically enriching project amenities; • Slope stabilization with appropriate vegetation; • Use of drought - tolerant non - invasive native plants adjacent to designated natural resource areas and waterways; • Use of recycled materials of local origin for hardscaping, mulching and /or soil amendments; • Protection of viewsheds and open space areas; and • Multiple uses for landscapes, such as stormwater parks, to maximize available land area and natural resources, and to increase the quality of public service or economic opportunity. 1.3 Development of Community Character It is the intent of these standards and guidelines to provide a sense of community character that is compatible with the City's culture and environment, and to strengthen the perception of the community as a unique place. The aim of community character development is to create and enhance a community identity, to increase the enjoyment and sense of community among the public, and to enhance the image of the community as a desirable place to live, work and shop. 000111 Resolution No. PC -2004- Page 8 a. Design with consistency and maintain a high standard of aesthetics: 1. Design elements should compliment the architectural theme. 2. Private and public uses should be visually separate, but aesthetically consistent. 3. Public and Private streets should take on an individual appearance with a common street tree and design intent. 4. Landscape areas and streetscape should include `surprises' such as a large focal tree. b. Introduce design ideas that compliment the City's cultural heritage and natural history such as: 1. `ranch' style and early Spanish architecture; 2. natural landscape elements such as native trees and shrubs; 3. natural building material such as river rock and boulders; 4. the City's agricultural heritage; 5. the railroad; 6. the arroyo; and 7. local chaparral and riparian plant communities. C. Integrate conservation and efficiency whenever possible, to enhance enjoyment of the unique characteristics of the area, such as: 1. mild, sunny climate; 2. maritime weather patterns; 3. distinctive shape of the existing terrain; 4. viewsheds; 5. beauty of local natural history; and 6. local building materials. 1.4 Public Access and Enjoyment The landscape plans shall meet all Title 24 and ADA accessibility requirements as well as all applicable codes for fire and building in order to promote health, safety and community welfare. The intent of these standards and guidelines is to universally provide safe access for use and enjoyment, on new projects and on modifications of existing projects. a. ADA accessibility and Title 24 requirements shall be incorporated for public, commercial and industrial projects, for both new projects and modification of existing projects. b. Landscapes shall be viable, functional and attractive, to provide universal access, use and enjoyment. Landscapes shall provide for the health, safety and welfare of the community, through compliance with all applicable ordinances for fire, health and safety. 000112 Resolution No. PC -2004- Page 9 C. In addition to ADA accessibility, landscapes should be designed for specific user populations as needed, whether for an elderly population, youth, or for specific disabilities such as blindness. Specific landscape functions and amenities should be considered. Examples include: 1. raised beds to wheelchair height and reach for handicapped and elderly access in a community garden; 2. casual seating located along pedestrian ways positioned for "people watching ", such as benches, steps, planters or grassy slopes, with a view onto a park, plaza or street; and 3. textured surfaces along pedestrian ways to guide non - sighted pedestrians. d. Landscapes shall enhance the microclimate and character of pedestrian ways and gathering places by adequately providing the following: 1. shade, from trees or from overhead structures; 2. screening; 3. seating; 4. lighting; 5. circulation, including adequate separation of pedestrian, bicycle, equestrian and vehicular circulation; and 6. attractive gathering spaces with focal amenities. 1.5 Fire Mitigation A Fuel Modification Plan may be required when a proposed project contains or is bounded by hazardous native vegetation as determined by the Ventura County Prevention District. This plan will demonstrate how the proposed project will mitigate potential fire hazards. The final Fuel Modification Plan shall be submitted in conjunction with landscape plans prior to review by the City. The final approved Fuel Modification Plan may take precedence over these standards and guidelines. SECTION 2 PROCESSING PROCEDURES 2.1 Pre - Submittal Meeting A pre - submittal meeting familiarizes the applicant with the review process, and identifies the information and materials necessary to file landscape plans. A pre - submittal meeting can be arranged by contacting the case planner at the Community Development Department. 2.2 Conceptual Landscape Package Submittal After the applicant has prepared all the information identified during the pre - submittal meeting, the landscape package shall be formally submitted with the required fee deposit in accordance with fee schedule and signed Reimbursement Agreement. (See Attachment V) 000113 Resolution No. PC -2004- Page 10 Elements to be included in the conceptual landscape plan package are as follows: a. existing trees and shrubs to be removed and /or protect in place; b. structures or buildings to be removed and /or protect in place; C. tree, shrub and groundcover plant palette; d. street tree plan; e. general plant sizes and locations; f. all design elements, site features and flatwork, including elevations or perspective drawings of those features; g. project entry monumentation layout and elevations or perspective drawings. h. walls and fences including details; i. paving and walkways; j. color and material schedule. Samples should be included for City to review; k. all site amenities. At a minimum, the site amenities should reference color and material (i.e. wood, metal, etc.); I. site and landscape lighting; M. preliminary parking lot shading plan if applicable. Plan should address all four seasons (refer to Section 10); and n. preliminary utility screening plan (refer to Section 9). 2.3 Conceptual Plan Review and Approval Upon receipt of the landscape package, the City's case planner shall review it for completeness and forward it to the City's consulting landscape architect for review. The consultant's review, which normally takes two weeks, consists of an on -site inspection and package review for consistency with City standards as outlined by this guide. Upon completion of the review, the consultant returns the package to the Planning Division with recommendations for approval or modification. This process is repeated until approval is achieved. Based upon the recommendations of the City's consulting landscape architect and case planner, the Community Development Director shall approve the project's landscape package. 2.4 Guarantee /Surety and Exoneration of Surety A surety bond may be required as a condition of approval in the following cases: a. To assure plant viability at least one year after installation. b. To assure installation of plants after issuance of a Zoning Clearance by the Planning Division and Certificate of Occupancy by Building and Safety. (This would normally be allowed only on non - sloped areas of residential projects where the applicant is providing landscaping). If, upon final landscape inspection, the Community Development Director determines that the landscaping and irrigation have been installed in accordance with the approved OOOI.14 Resolution No. PC -2004- Page 11 plans, the Community Development Director may recommend that the guarantee /surety be returned to the applicant. 2.5 Installation and Inspection Landscaping for commercial, industrial and residential sloped areas shall be installed prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy by the City Building and Safety Division. The applicant's landscape architect shall be required to certify in writing to the Community Development Director that all work has been completed in accordance with the approved plans and specifications (Attachment VI). The City's landscape consultant will conduct the final landscape inspection after receipt of the certification. (See Section 4 — Installation Verification and Attachment I — Landscape Submittal Plan Checklist & Landscape Inspection Requirements) 2.6 Compliance Discretionary development permits may be conditioned for follow -up inspections to verify a maintenance program, water management auditing, or compliance with environmental mitigation measures. Failure by the applicant, successor in interest, or homeowner's association to maintain installed common area landscaping and /or irrigation systems will constitute a violation of the Conditions of Approval and /or Mitigation Measures of the development permit. SECTION 3 PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS The project's landscape package shall be prepared by a California Registered Landscape Architect, unless waived by the Community Development Director. Plans must be wet - stamped, signed and dated. Plan submittals shall include the following: (see Attachment I — Landscape Plan Review Checklist) 3.1 Plan Check Fees The applicant shall pay the deposit fee in accordance with the fee schedule and submit a signed reimbursement agreement to cover landscape review and inspection. Fees shall include costs of any required follow -up inspections. (See Attachment V — Reimbursement Agreement for Plan Review) 3.2 General Plan Preparation Requirements (See Attachment I — Landscape Plan Review Checklist) a. Base Sheets: Plans shall be drawn on clear and legible base sheets prepared especially for the landscape submittal. 2. Plans shall not exceed 30" x 42" or be less than 22" x 36" in size. 3. Base Sheets should accurately and clearly show the following existing and proposed features: a) property lines; b) streets, street rights -of -way, access easements and /or public or private driveways, walkways, bike paths, and any other paved areas; 000115 Resolution No. PC -2004- Page 12 C) all existing and proposed buildings and structures; d) parking areas, lighting, striping, curbs and wheel stops; e) all existing and proposed trees, shrubs and other significant landscape features; i.e., water courses, rock outcroppings, etc.; f) grading areas; top and toe of slopes, slope direction (engineer's Precise Grading plans must included with submittal); g) all Utilities, including street lighting, fire hydrants, transformers, electric meters, irrigation equipment, air conditioning units, etc.; h) existing native vegetation, on -site and on contiguous parcels, may be shown in a generalized manner; and i) fire clearance zone, if applicable (Approved Fuel Modification Plan must be included with submittal). b. Scale: The scale shall not be smaller than V=20' unless prior approval is received from the Community Development Director. C. Title Block: A title block shall be included on all plans indicating the names, addresses and phone numbers of the applicant and the landscape architect. The title block shall include a north arrow and scale for each sheet. Each sheet shall be clearly labeled. The title block shall include the California Registered Landscape Architect's seal. Each sheet shall be `wet- signed' for final approval. d. Title Sheet: Content of the Title Sheet shall include the following: 1. project title; 2. title block; 3. vicinity map; 4. location map; 5. sheet index; 6. landscape approval block (see Attachment I — Landscape Plan Review Checklist); and 7. landscape inspection schedule (see Attachment I — Landscape Plan Review Checklist). e. Other Items. 1. One (1) copy of the engineer's precise grading plans shall be included with the landscape submittal. 2. The final Fuel Modification Plan shall be included with the landscape submittal if applicable. 000116 Resolution No. PC -2004- Page 13 3.3 Planting Plan Requirements (See Attachment I — Landscape Plan Review Checklist) Plan Preparation Requirements: a. A Horticultural Soils Analysis with recommendations shall be attached to the landscape plans. (See Section 3.4 below) b. The plans must include notation that a ninety (90) day maintenance period is required and that expenses are to be paid for by the owner. C. The planting plan shall include maintenance notes on either the plans or in the specifications. d. Planting specifications shall be included. e. Existing and proposed grades and drainage elements are shown f. All design elements shown on the approved Landscape Concept Plan; i.e. recreational areas, outdoor eating areas, trails, etc. g. Location and spacing of all plants are clearly identified. h. Common and botanical names of all plants are listed. i. Size and quantity of all plants are listed. j. Seed mix information including: 1. rate; 2. mix; 3. mulch; 4. binder; 5. fertilization; and 6. inoculation. k. Planting details and general planting notes shall be included. 3.4 Soils Analysis A soils report performed by a laboratory that is a member of the California Association of Agricultural Laboratories shall be attached to the landscape plans. The soil sample tested shall be taken after site grading and the date of the sample shall be included on the report. The planting backfill mixture and soil amendments shall be based on this analysis. Use of soil amendments produced from recycled yard trimmings and /or organic wastes of local origin is encouraged, whenever feasible. The report shall include the following: 00011"7 Resolution No. PC -2004- Page 14 a. Determination of soil texture indicating the percentage of organic matter shall be indicated. b. An approximate determination of the soil infiltration rate shall be indicated. A range of infiltration rates should be noted, where appropriate C. Measure of pH and total soluble salts shall be indicated. d. Amendments and recommendations for improving water - holding properties shall be noted. 3.5 Irrigation Plan Requirements (See Attachment I — Landscape Plan Review Checklist) All landscape areas shall be provided with an approved irrigation system that meets the requirements of this section. Specific site conditions and proposed landscape materials will determine the design of the irrigation system. The irrigation system shall deliver water efficiently and uniformly. All equipment shall be designed for installation per manufacturer's recommendation, and conform to Uniform Plumbing Codes and all local regulations. a. When considering design alternatives, the following criteria shall be utilized: 1. Head -to -head coverage: The irrigation design shall provide adequate "head -to- head" and sufficient water for the continued healthy growth of all proposed plantings with a minimum of waste or overspray on adjoining areas. 2. Reduced Pressure Backflow Device: Notation shall be on the landscape plan that the backflow device must be tested at a minimum of once a year. All backflow devices shall be installed in a mesh enclosure with green or tan powder coating. 3. Uniform distribution: The distribution of uniformity of an installed sprinkler system shall meet or exceed seventy percent (70 %). 4. Controllers: Automatic irrigation controllers are required with separate programs for each landscape area with a different irrigation need. Controllers shall be capable of controlling the operating time for each circuit, the starting time and daily schedule of operation. Each controller must be able to accommodate multiple schedules and contain fourteen (14) -day minimum clocks; percentage switches; repeat cycles; the ability to schedule by the day of the week; and rain sensing override devices. A watering schedule shall be placed in each controller. 5. Soil moisture sensors: Soil moisture sensing devices are suggested in representative areas of the landscape plan. 6. Point irrigation: Drip emitters and bubblers are recommended for trees and shrubs. 7. Runoff and overspray: Soil types and percolation rate shall be considered when designing irrigation systems. All irrigation systems shall be 000118 Resolution No. PC -2004- Page 15 designed to avoid runoff, low head drainage, overspray, or other similar conditions where water flows onto adjacent areas, walks, roadways, or structures. The water application rate shall attempt to match the infiltration rate of the soil. Repeat cycles shall be utilized in an effort to avoid runoff. Sprinkler heads should be properly located to minimize landscape water overspray or runoff onto hardscape, unplanted areas, or areas of dissimilar water needs. 8. Quick couplers: Quick couplers or hose bibs are required at one - hundred foot (100') intervals throughout the project. 9. Sprinkler heads: Sprinkler heads shall be selected for proper area coverage, precipitation rate, operating pressure, adjustment capability, and ease of maintenance. Heads or emitters shall have matched precipitation rates within ten percent (10 %) for each control valve circuit. Above ground risers are not allowed next to sidewalks, driveways, or curbs and are discouraged anywhere people can easily access; these sprinklers must be the pop -up type. In areas less than six feet wide, drip emitters and bubblers are recommended. 10. Rain sensing override devices: Rain sensing override devices are required on all irrigation systems. 11. Back -up System: The irrigation system shall be installed with a back -up system should an operating valve fail to shutoff or a break in the mainline occurs. The back up system should either consist of a normally open master valve with flow meter or a normally closed master valve. On large irrigation systems, a normally open master valve with flow meter will be required. 12. Pi in : Plastic (PVC) mainline piping requires placement not less than 18" below final grade and minimum twenty -four inches (24 ") below finish surface of streets, with lateral lines requiring 12" depth. UVR (Ultra Violet Resistant) above ground pipe shall only be installed on slope areas. Galvanized lines shall be above ground. Other piping shall be considered for drip or temporary irrigation. Piping for reclaimed water systems shall follow current County Health and State Health standards for pipe color, depth and separation. All irrigation piping under streets or flatwork shall be sleeved with sch 40 PVC minimum two (2) times the diameter of the pipe enclosed. 13. Water meters: Landscape irrigation systems shall be on a separate water meter unless waived by the Community Development Director. A separate meter provides for monitoring of landscape irrigation efficiency. 14. Reclaimed water: If reclaimed water is available, and if installation is determined to be feasible and is approved by the Ventura Councy Environmental Health Division in conjunction with the local water purveyor, a reclaimed irrigation system shall be installed. 000119 Resolution No. PC -2004- Page 16 b. Plan Preparation Requirements 1. Irrigation Plans shall be separate from Planting Plans, and shall have clear graphic indication of all system components with an irrigation legend on each sheet and shall include the following: a) equipment manufacturer; b) type of equipment; C) model number; d) precipitation rate; e) size; f) gallon per minute (GPM) demand; g) pounds per square inch (p.s.i.) demand; h) radius of cover for each head type; i) name and telephone number of the water purveyor; j) design and static water pressure (contact water company) and note reference engineer and date; k) point of connection (location and size); 1) backflow protection as approved by Ventura County Environmental Health; m) controllers, including number of stations; n) remote control valves including gallonage requirement, piping, heads and quick couplers (or hose bibs); o) pipe sizes indicated numerically (i.e.' /2 ", 3 /d', etc.); and P) rain shut off device. 2. The plans shall include the landscape inspection requirements. The inspection schedule shall be included on the Title Sheet. (See Attachment 1) 3. The plans shall include an irrigation schedule. 4. Worst case pressure loss calculation for the circuit with the highest demand, farthest distance from the POC and highest elevation shall be provided. 5. Details and specifications shall be provided for all irrigation system components. 3.6 Maintenance Program Landscapes of residential common areas and commercial or industrial projects shall be carefully and competently maintained to ensure water efficiency and high quality appearance. A watering schedule encased in plastic shall be kept inside each controller (with reduced as -built plans showing hydro- zones). Maintenance guideline notes must appear on the planting plan drawings. Using these standards and guidelines, a 000120 Resolution No. PC -2004- Page 17 schedule for ongoing maintenance shall be prepared and shown on the planting plan. The maintenance guidelines shall be as follows: Post - installation Maintenance Standards and Guidelines a. Any alterations to the landscape must be approved by the Community Development Director. b. Control all harmful diseases and pests. All chemical applications must be per state licensed advisors and applications. C. Pruning shall be done to keep plants within special limitations, removal of deadwood, cross - branching, etc., per International Society of Arboriculture (ISA) standards. Plants shall never be sheared unless specified on the approved plan. Trees are to be allowed to grow to the designed size to provide maximum shading of paved areas. d. Water shall be applied for optimum plant growth with minimal runoff or overspray. Adjust controllers per current California Irrigation Management Information System (CI MIS) data. Information can be obtained at www.cimis.ca.gov . e. Always replace heads with the same kind of head, or head with a matching precipitation rate. f. Backflow device shall be tested and certified annually by the Ventura County Environmental Health Division. g. Inspect tree supports frequently, and remove as soon as the plants will stand without support and will be able to resist wind damage. Never allow support materials to girdle the trunk or branches. h. Landscape irrigation shall be scheduled during the night or early morning hours. i. A regular maintenance schedule shall include checking, adjusting, and repairing the irrigation equipment; aerating and de- thatching turf areas; replenishing mulch; fertilizing; pruning; weeding; and removing litter in all landscaped areas. SECTION 4 INSTALLATION VERIFICATION 4.1 Approved Plans /Conditions Copies of the approved landscape plans and conditions are kept and available at the City of Moorpark, Community Development Department. 4.2 Landscape Condition Compliance Review Prior to completion of the landscaping and prior to final inspection, the City's landscape consultant shall inspect the site and certify that the landscape complies with these standards and guidelines per the attached inspection schedule (see Attachment 1). The applicant shall notify the City a minimum of forty -eight (48) hours prior to inspection. Upon completion of the installation of the landscaping and prior to final inspection, the applicant's landscape consultant shall inspect the site and certify that the landscape complies with these standards and guidelines. Certification shall be accomplished by completing the Certificate of Compliance checklist (see attachment VII). Concurrently or afterwards, the City's landscape consultant shall inspect the landscape planting and 000121 Resolution No. PC -2004- Page 18 irrigation installations for final conformance with the approved plans and specifications. The applicant must also employ a certified backflow tester to certify the backflow device. A second inspection of residential common areas, commercial or industrial projects shall be conducted by the City's landscape consultant one year after certification to assure condition compliance including irrigation efficiency and plant viability. 4.3 Maintenance Program Landscapes of residential common areas, commercial or industrial projects shall be carefully and competently maintained to ensure water efficiency and high quality appearance. A watering schedule and as -built plans shall be encased in plastic and shall be kept in each controller. SECTION 5 CONTINUED COMPLIANCE REQUIRED The applicant, successor in interest, or homeowner's association shall maintain installed landscaping and efficient irrigation systems in compliance with the Conditions of Approval and /or Mitigation Measures of the development permit. SECTION 6 WATER BUDGET AND PROJECTED WATER USE CALCULATIONS Each landscape plan must have a water budget and projected water use calculations. Each project site is allowed a certain amount of water based upon the climate of the site and the total square footage of the planting area. Any plant can be used, provided the combined projected water use of all the plants does not exceed the water budget. A water budget calculation is based on the site's size and the reference Evapotranspiration (ET) factor. Included in the calculation of ET factors are evapotranspiration rates, precipitation rates, a crop coefficient and an allowance for uniformity. The reference ET factors within Ventura County are available at the CIMIS website at www.cimis.ca.gov. The water budget and projected water use calculations shall be submitted as part of the irrigation plan. The projected water use shall not exceed the water budget. A reproducible hydro -zone map showing separation of planting areas with plant factors shall be submitted as part of the landscape package. Areas such as parks, golf courses or school yards where turf provides a playing surface may require additional water. A statement to that effect shall be included with the planting plan, designating areas to be set aside for such purposes. The designated recreation area may receive more water than the water budget allows on a case -by -case basis. Such additional allocation shall be consistent with Ventura County's policy regarding the use of reclaimed water for golf courses. Calculating the Water Budget of a Project Site A site's water budget is determined by multiplying the square footage of the planting area by the site's ET factor. After you have determined how much water is in your budget, you can then calculate the projected water use of your proposed planting plan. To calculate the water budget of a site use this formula: Water Budget (GallonsNear) _ (ET) x (8) x (LA) x (.62) oOOx..22 Resolution No. PC -2004- Page 19 Water Budget = Maximum Applied Water Allowance (gallyr) ETo = Reference Evapotranspiration (incheslyr) ,g = ET Adjustment Factor LA = Landscaped Area (in square feet) .62 = Conversion Factor (to gal. /sq. ft.) This formula is based on California state law (Assembly Bill 325). Calculating the Project Water Use of a Landscape Plan: The total amount of projected water use should be less than or equal to the site's water budget. To determine the plant factor, multiply the plant factor of each planting hydro - zone by its square footage. Then add the results and complete the calculation of projected water use for the entire planting area. Generalized plant factors are: .3 = low water using plants, .5 = average water using plants, and .8 = high water using plants. These factors must be agreed upon by the designer and the City. If a plant is not on the list, an equivalency determination will be made by the Community Development Director. Any changes in the irrigation system or landscape will require new water projections. To calculate the projected water use of a landscape plan, use this formula: Projected Water Use (Gallons /year) _ (ET) x HPF) x (HA)1 x (.62) IE ETo = Reference Evapotranspiration (inches /year) PF = Plant Factor (.1 low through .9 high) HA = Hydro -zone Area (square feet) (.62) = Conversion Factor (to gallons /square foot) IE = Irrigation Efficiency (minimum .625) For the purpose of determining the projected water use, irrigation efficiency is assumed to be 0.625 or better. Irrigation systems shall be designed, maintained and managed to meet or exceed 0.625 efficiency. If the plant factors average 0.5, the water budget will be met at an irrigation efficiency of 0.625. SECTION 7 PUBLIC RIGHT -OF -WAY Special attention should be given to the planning and design of areas that are to be maintained by the City and /or are within the public right -of -way. These areas should utilize drought tolerant planting material, planting material that is low maintenance and utilize water conservation techniques without compromising the aesthetics of the design. 7.1 Parkways and streetscapes The design and layout of the streetscape is not only important to identify and individualize the project area, but also to capture the characteristics of Moorpark. The following goals should be considered: The street tree should be of the same species for each street to promote consistency and area identity. 000:123 Resolution No. PC -2004- Page 20 The streetscape must be designed with parkways. Sidewalks should meander whenever possible. Secondary trees outside of the right -of -way should consist of randomly spaced tree groves and informal massings. Trees and shrubs should be chosen to provide varying texture, color and form. The landscaping should be consistent with the architectural theme. Shrub plantings should consist of layers of planting of varying heights. a. General Streetscape Requirements 1. There shall be a minimum of one (1) shrub per ten (10) s.f. and one (1) tree per four - hundred (400) s.f., exclusive of street trees located within the parkway area. 2. Shrubs shall be minimum 5- gallon size. 3. Accent and perennials shall be located in groupings or massings along the planting edges at a distance not to exceed twenty feet (20)' on center. The accent and perennial groupings are exclusive of the shrub - planting requirement. Accent and perennial plant massings shall consist of minimum 1- gallon container size plants with a minimum of twenty -five (25) plants per grouping. Larger groupings at a distance greater than thirty feet (30') may be installed provided the plant quantities are met. 4. With the exception of street trees and median island trees, the minimum tree size is 15gallon. 5. All shrub areas shall be installed with flatted groundcover unless the landscape is installed with container plantings that will fill in within one year. 6. All shrub areas shall be installed with minimum one -inch (1") depth of bark mulch. 7. Turf may be allowed within the parkway area but not in the median island areas. 8. All planting shall be drought tolerant and low maintenance. 9. Six -inch (6 ") wide concrete headers shall be installed between turf and shrub areas. 10. Turf shall not be installed on slopes that exceed a 4:1 ratio. b. Street Tree Requirements 1. Street trees should be spaced according to the mature canopy size of the tree, but in no circumstance should the spacing exceed thirty feet (30') on center without City approval. 2. Street trees shall be minimum 24" box size with minimum 1 '/4" caliper. Trees shall be between eight (8') to twelve (12)' height with a minimum two foot (2') wide spread. 000124 Resolution No. PC -2004- Page 21 3. Trees shall be standard trunk, not multi- trunk. 4. All street trees within ten feet (10') of walks, curbs, or other hardscape areas shall be installed with a linear root barrier ten feet (10') in length by twenty -four inch (24 ") in depth installed against the hardscape area centered on the tree trunk. 5. Trees shall be located per the sight distance requirements established by the City Engineer at intersections. Unless otherwise determined by the City Engineer, street trees shall not be closer than twenty -five (25') to the back of curb return. 6. Street trees shall be located no less than five feet (5') from curbs, sidewalks and other hardscape areas, unless they are located in parkways. 7. Street trees shall be located no less than ten feet (10') from utility poles and light standards, fire hydrants, utility structures and driveway aprons. 8. Trees that may exceed twenty feet (20') vertical height at maturity shall not be located under utility lines. 7.2 Median Island Planting Requirements a. General Requirements 1. There shall be a minimum of one (1) shrub per ten (10) s.f. and one (1) tree per four - hundred (400) s.f. 2. Shrubs shall consist of minimum 5- gallon container sizes. 3. In median islands ten feet (10') wide or greater, accent and perennials shall be located in massings along the planting edges at a distance not to exceed thirty feet (30') on center and shall be exclusive of the shrub - planting requirement. Accent and perennial plant massings shall consist of minimum 1- gallon container size plants with a minimum of twenty -five (25) plants per grouping. Larger groupings at a distance greater than thirty feet (30') may be installed provided the plant quantities are met. 4. Median island trees shall be minimum seventy -five percent (75 %) 24" box size and twenty -five percent (25 %) 15- gallon container sizes. 5. All shrub areas shall be installed with flatted groundcover unless the landscape is installed with container plantings that will fill in within one year. 6. All shrub areas shall be installed with minimum 1" depth of bark mulch. 7. Turf is not allowed in the median islands. 8. All planting shall be drought tolerant and low maintenance. 9. All trees shall be installed with a linear root barrier ten feet (10') in length by twenty -four inch (24 ") in depth installed against the hardscape area centered on the tree trunk. b. Planting Design Requirements 000125 Resolution No. PC -2004- Page 22 1. Median island trees shall consist of a variety of tree species of varying form, texture and color. Flowering and canopy trees are encouraged. 2. Trees shall be located per the sight distance requirements established by the City Engineering Department. Trees shall not be installed adjacent to a turn pocket. 3. Shrubs located adjacent to the turn pocket shall not exceed eighteen inches (18 ") in height. Larger shrubs are permitted at a distance of twenty feet (20') from the beginning of the turn pocket, but shall not exceed thirty inches (30 ") in height. 4. Turf is not permitted in median islands. 5. An eighteen -inch (18 ") wide hardscape edge shall be installed along the entire length of the median island adjacent to the curb for maintenance. The hardscape band shall consist of either colored, stamped concrete, or concrete pavers, to match the architectural theme of the project. SECTION 8 COMMERCIAL, INDUSTRIAL AND MULTI - FAMILY PROJECTS Landscape screening is particularly important with respect to commercial, industrial and multi - family street frontages. The large building mass, parking areas and maintenance staging areas are all relatively visible from the street frontage and require landscaping to soften the architecture and screen utility structures. a. General Planting Requirements 1. Minimum percentage of landscape coverage shall be provided within on- site parking areas consistent with Chapter 17.32 of the Moorpark Municipal Code. 2. There shall be a minimum of one (1) shrub per one - hundred (100) s.f. and one (1) tree per five - hundred (500) s.f., exclusive of street trees located within the parkway area. 3. Shrubs shall consist of eighty percent (80 %) 5- gallon and twenty percent (20 %) 1- gallon of each variety. 4. Turf shall not exceed ten percent (10 %) of the total landscape area, exclusive of the parkway area. 5. Large groupings of accent, perennials and annuals are encouraged. 6. Trees shall be a minimum seventy -five percent (75 %) 24" box and twenty - five percent (25 %) 15- gallon. 7. All shrub areas shall be installed with flatted groundcover unless the landscape is installed with container plantings that will fill in within one year. 8. All shrub areas shall be installed with minimum one -inch (1 ") depth of bark mulch. 9. The planting palette shall be consistent with these standards and guidelines. 000126 Resolution No. PC -2004- Page 23 10. Turf shall not be installed on slopes that exceed 4:1. b. Planting Design Requirements. 1. The landscape buffer shall consist of tall vertical trees adjacent to the building and lower canopy trees adjacent to the street frontage. 2. The tree planting shall consist of a mixture of evergreen, deciduous and flowering trees. 3. All utilities, trash enclosures, maintenance staging areas, etc. shall be screened from view. 4. A parkway with street trees shall be installed at the street frontage. 5. Large specimen trees and enhanced landscaping shall be located at the entry locations. Specimen trees shall be minimum 36" box size. 6. Parking areas should be screened from public view from the street. SECTION 9 UTILITIES To reduce the visibility of generally unattractive utility equipment, landscape screening shall be incorporated. For the purpose of these standards and guidelines, utility structures are any appurtenances that are above ground and have been installed in conjunction with new construction or are existing and part of a newly renovated project (i.e. electric meters, transformers, irrigation equipment, air conditioning units, etc.). The landscape plans shall identify all utility structures on site and provide appropriate screening. a. General Design Requirements 1. All utility structures shall be screened from view with appropriate landscaping. 2. Utility structures shall utilize camouflage, disguising the facility as a natural or more aesthetically pleasing man -made object to soften its visual impact on its surroundings. 3. Access to utility structures shall be maintained, while at least seventy -five (75 %) of the shall be screened from view. 4. Bollards shall not be installed with any new utility equipment unless required by governing agency. 5. All utility equipment shall be located at the rear of the property. 6. All utility equipment shall be located in shrub areas with a minimum of three feet (3') clear distance around all sides for appropriate landscape screening. 7. Screening shall take into consideration traffic sight distance requirements established by the City Engineer. SECTION 10 PARKING AREAS Parking lots should be designed to provide ease of access and safety as well as to enhance the visual quality of the City. The ultimate goal of the design is to provide a 00012'7 Resolution No. PC -2004- Page 24 safe environment, minimize the visual appearance of the large expanse of asphalt and to reduce glare, ambient temperature and traffic noise. a. General Design Requirements 1. A minimum of fifteen percent (15 %) of the total parking area shall consist of landscaping. Landscaping shall be computed on the basis of the net parking facility, which includes parking stalls (covered and uncovered), aisles and walkways, but does not include required landscaping adjacent to streets and within the public right -of -way. 2. All parking rows shall terminate with a planter or island that is a minimum of five -foot (5) width. Parking rows shall not exceed forty feet (40') in length without the addition of a planter finger or island. 3. A minimum of one (1) tree per every four (4) stalls is required to meet the shade requirement. 4. There shall be a minimum of one (1) shrub per ten (10) s.f. 5. Shrubs shall consist of eighty percent (80 %) 5- gallon size and twenty percent (20 %) 1- gallon size. 6. Interior shrub planting shall not exceed thirty inches (30 ") in height. 7. Turf is not allowed in parking areas. 8. Additional groupings of accent plants and perennials are required. 9. The minimum tree size is 24" box. 10. All shrub areas shall be installed with flatted groundcover unless the landscape is installed with container plantings that will fill in within one year. 11. All shrub areas shall be installed with minimum one -inch (1 ") depth of bark mulch. 12. The planting palette shall be consistent with these standards and guidelines. b. Planting Design Requirements 1. The parking area and parked cars shall be adequately screened from view from the street frontage with landscaping. 2. There shall be a minimum of fifty percent (50 %) tree shade coverage of the parking area. This is determined at two - thirds (2/3) tree maturity or fifteen (15) years after installation. 3. A shade coverage exhibit must be submitted to the Community Development Director for review and approval. 4. A minimum of one (1) `finger' planter, five feet (5) in width, shall be provided at a minimum of every forty (40) lineal feet, and at the end of every parking aisle. 0®0128 Resolution No. PC -2004- Page 25 5. A minimum of one (1) `diamond' planter shall be provided at every fourth stall within the parking area or as needed to obtain the shade coverage requirement. 6. A minimum of one (1) `finger' planter, five feet (5) in width, shall be provided at every eight (8) stalls adjacent to the building or street frontage. Additional tree massings shall be included adjacent to these areas to provide the shade coverage required. 7. Decorative paving material is encouraged to break up the large expanse of concrete or asphalt. 8. Landscape areas shall be designed so as to discourage pedestrians from crossing any landscape areas to reach building entrances or parked vehicles. 9. Landscape islands shall be designed with walkways that encourage pedestrian circulation through the parking area. 10. Wheel stops are not allowed. 11. An eighteen inch (18 ") wide concrete band adjacent to the access side of the vehicle shall be installed adjacent to the median island curb for pedestrian access. 12. Median islands shall be a minimum of five feet (5) wide without a walkway and fifteen feet (15) wide with a five -foot (5), walkway not including the curb. SECTION 11 EROSION CONTROL AND NATURAL AREAS Erosion control landscaping is required to reduce soil erosion and excessive runoff due to construction activities. Erosion control landscaping can also provide an aesthetically pleasing hillside with the proper selection of plant material and design intent. a. General Design Requirements 1. Slope planting design should incorporate three (3) levels of vegetation: ground cover, shrubs and trees. Each planting level should provide varying levels of height, texture and color. 2. `Ornamental' orchards are strongly discouraged and shall only be considered on a case -by -case basis and accompanied by a long -term care and maintenance plan. 3. A minimum five -foot (5) wide Transition Zone of ornamental planting shall separate streets or sidewalks from native areas. The planting species chosen for these areas shall not be invasive or subject to naturalizing and shall be drought tolerant. 4. Pepper Trees are strongly discouraged except as specimen trees within the historic downtown area. 5. Eucalyptus Trees are strongly discouraged and shall only be considered on a case -by -case basis. 000129 Resolution No. PC -2004- Page 26 6. All manufactured slopes, three feet (3') or greater in vertical height, shall be planted with groundcover from cuttings, shrubs and trees. Hydroseed may be considered adjacent to naturalized areas with prior City approval. 7. All manufactured slopes, five feet (5') or greater in vertical height, shall be installed with jute mesh or equal per City approval. 8. Shrubs on slopes shall be planted at a minimum of one (1) shrub per one - hundred (100) square feet. 9. Trees on slopes shall be planted at a minimum of one (1) tree per three - hundred -fifty (350) square feet. 10. Minimum tree size is seventy -five percent (75 %) 15- gallon and twenty -five percent (25 %) 24" box. 11. Minimum shrub size is sixty percent (60 %) 5- gallon and forty percent (40 %) 1- gallon. 12. All slopes planted with cuttings shall be treated with a pre- emergent herbicide per the manufacturer's recommendations and must be identified on the landscape plans. 13. Any existing slope area cleared by construction activity shall, at a minimum, be "`re- vegetated" with a hydroseed mix and temporary irrigation system. The restoration requirement for cleared areas will be per the City's discretion. At a minimum the cleared area shall be restored to its original condition. 14. All existing vegetation shall be retained to the greatest extent possible. The City shall determine mitigation measures for the loss of existing trees. 15. To the greatest extent possible, existing trees that cannot be preserved shall be relocated on site. 16. All manufactured slopes shall be permanently irrigated with an automatic irrigation system. 17. Unimproved disturbed and slope areas shall be landscaped within one - hundred- eighty (180) days following the issuance of a grading permit and /or within thirty (30) days prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. 18. Temporary slope erosion control plans are required if the unimproved areas are not permanently planted and irrigated through the rainy season. 19. All slope erosion control plans, temporary slope erosion control plans and landscape plans that include disturbed areas, shall be approved prior to the issuance of a building permit and shall be submitted prior to the issuance of a grading permit. 20. All hardscape structures such as bench drains and slough walls shall be designed to blend into the hillside with matching colored concrete or masonry color. 21. All hardscape structures shall be screened with plant material. 000130 Resolution No. PC -2004- Page 27 22. Slope landscaping shall not be accepted by the City until 100% planting coverage has been attained. b. Planting Design Requirements 1. Slope planting shall promote varying height, mass, texture, color and form. Large masses of shrubs shall be designed in groupings. 2. The slope planting must reinforce the theme of the hillside area. 3. Plant material shall reinforce the natural hillside terrain and /or general manufactured topography. 4. Low growing and medium size shrubs shall be placed at the lower slope areas in large massings. Medium and large shrub massings should be intermingled at the mid and upper slopes areas. Plantings must respect neighboring views (see fig. 12.1 & 12.2 in Attachment IX). 5. Canopy trees shall be placed at the lower slope areas and shall not grow above the height of the top of slope at view conditions. Canopy trees shall be placed in random clusters adjacent to property lines to open view corridors. Vertical trees shall be located at the upper slope areas adjacent to property lines at view conditions (see fig. 12.3, 12.4 in Attachment IX). 6. Trees located on large slopes shall be grouped in clusters to maintain a natural appearance, C. Irrigation Design Standards, 1. All manufactured slopes shall be installed with a permanent, automatic irrigation system. 2. UVR PVC, or "browinline ", may be installed only on master association or LMD slopes. However, all toe -of -slope conditions shall be buried and installed with pop -up heads. 3. Private slopes shall Ibe installed with buried PVC pipe. 4. All slope irrigation shall be installed with an approved means of backflow prevention. 5. Separate circuits shall be installed for top, toe and mid slope conditions. 6. Spray heads shall be designed to avoid bench drains. Heads shall be installed on both sides to maintain coverage. 7. Spray heads shall ble designed with respect to the topography. 8. A master valve withl'iflow sensor is required at all point of connections. 9. Rain sensing override devices are required. 10. Worst case pressure loss calculations shall be included for the circuit with the highest volume,', the circuit with the longest run from the POC and the circuit at the highest elevation. 11. An irrigation schedule shall be included within the irrigation controller box. 000131 Resolution No. PC -2004- Page 28 12. All necessary means shall be taken to prevent low head drainage. The plans must specify that any head that drains for more than sixty (60) seconds requires a check valve. SECTION 12 RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENTS 12.1 Water- Efficient Model Home Requirements a. General: These requirements apply to all Residential Zones whenever model homes are involved. If there are two or more model homes, one shall be designed to meet the water - saving landscaping condition for residential tracts. Each "water- saving" model home shall contain exclusively low -water use plant materials and efficient irrigation systems with appropriate signs and information for prospective home buyers. b. Water Meter: Each model in the complex, including the low -water use model, shall be equipped with a water meter to generate records on how much water the landscape uses. The information will be used in public information materials about the model and the water - saving potential for low -water use landscapes. C. Plant Material: All plants used are to be low -water using types and readily available in Ventura County or other nearby sources. The plants used should be attractive, including some flowering types, require relatively little maintenance once established, and enhance the appearance of the model. d. Use of Lawn: When there are two models, the use of lawn in the water - efficient model shall not exceed twenty -five percent (25 %) of the net landscaped area with no limit on front yard use. When there are three or more models, the use of lawn shall be no more than total fifteen percent (15 %) of the net landscaped area of the water - efficient model. The net landscaped area is the gross area minus the house foot print, the driveway, detached garage, attached covered patio, slopes of 3:1 ratio or steeper and higher than four feet. Low -water use varieties of lawn shall be used. e. Irrigation System: The irrigation system serving a low -water use landscape shall include a bubbler and /or drip system valve. Any sprinklers shall be located properly to minimize overspray onto unplanted areas. At least one (1) moisture sensor should be used with a sign indicating its location. The moisture sensor will override the controller if the soil is too wet to require irrigation. f. Signs: Signs identifying aspects of the landscape design and irrigation shall be placed around the model. These signs should be clearly marked on the landscape plan for the model. The criteria below should be used in developing and placing the signs. 1. Entrance Sign: A maximum four (4) square foot sign shall be located in front of or at the entrance to the model home. The sign shall indicate that the model is landscaped with low -water using or drought tolerant plant materials and that an efficient irrigation system has been used. 2. Identification Signs: Small, maximum one (1) square foot, Identification signs shall be placed throughout the landscaped area identifying the irrigation system used, the different sub -areas of the landscape, and any oOO132 Resolution No. PC -2004- Page 29 other features that contribute to the overall water conservation theme (hardscapes, redwood bark, mulch). One (1) sign shall identify the moisture sensor in the display. 3. Interior Signs or Displays: A drawing or combination of drawings should be displayed inside the model providing a schematic of the landscape. These drawings should include a key identifying the plants in the yard. It is suggested that this schematic also be printed in a one (1) page handout to be available at the model or the sales office. The drawings could be simplified renderings of the landscape plan itself, using common names rather than the botanical names for the plants. The drawings should be colorful, easy to read, and framed for protection. g. Literature: A package of literature describing water conserving landscaping shall be given out to individuals upon purchase of a home in the tract. This literature and additional materials shall be displayed inside the model, also enclosed in a frame, with a note indicating where this material can be obtained. 12.2 Private Front Yards Residential landscapes are those which occur on private property outside the street right -of -way. These areas are installed and maintained by the homeowner or homeowner association. The following suggestions are provided to assist the homeowner or the association in establishing a well conceived and balanced landscape design with the emphasis on allowing the maximum amount of creativity as possible while still meeting the intent of these guidelines. a. Water Conservation: 1. Turf areas should be limited to one -third (1/3) of the total landscape area. The remaining area should include one -third (1/3) shrubs /groundcover and one -third (1/3) hardscape. 2. Irrigated areas should be separated between turf and shrub /groundcover areas. This allows for different watering schedules to meet the various water needs of different plant materials. 3. Automated irrigation controllers and remote control valves should be utilized to efficiently monitor watering schedules. This prevents accidental all night watering and also provides freedom to leave the landscape for prolonged periods of time without creating stress conditions. 4. Irrigation design should include properly sized sprinkler heads (spray radius) and provide head to head spacing of sprinklers to insure adequate coverage. 5. Water overspray should be kept to a minimum of one foot (1') to two feet (2') on hardscape surfaces and avoid spraying on walls and fences. 6. Bubbler and drip irrigation is encouraged for use in small landscape areas. 000133 Resolution No. PC -2004- Page 30 7. Turf varieties should be selected for durability and reduced water needs. Alta fescue and Bermuda hybrids (with perennial rye grass used as a "nurse crop" in winter) are encouraged. 8. Shrubs selected should be compatible with the climatic conditions of the inland valleys (hot and cold) and somewhat drought tolerant. b. Planting 1. Trees should be selected based on their size at maturity. 2. A balance of evergreen and deciduous (leafless in winter) trees should be planted to provide a seasonally changed landscape. 3. Shrubs and groundcovers should be selected based on their eventual size to avoid an "overgrown" or butchered appearance. 4. Foreground and background relationships should be utilized in shrub and groundcover plantings. 5. Screening (planting of trees and /or shrubs of undesirable views is encouraged. 6. View opportunities should be maintained as a courtesy to adjacent property owners. C. Installation: All planting areas should be loosened to a depth of six inches (6 ") and rototilled in two (2) directions with soil amendments and conditioners as required by soil type. d. Maintenance 1. Landscape areas should be maintained in an attractive condition at all times. 2. Regular fertilization with a well - balanced fertilizer should be done to avoid stressed conditions and prevent disease. e. Safety 1. Water overspray on hardscape areas should be avoided and kept to a minimum. 2. Pop -up sprinkler heads on swing joints should be used along walkways to avoid a "trip hazard ". 12.3 Street Trees It is the goal of the City of Moorpark to create an overall cohesive theme in terms of street tree design and species selection. Street trees should be incorporated into the overall landscape theme of the development. The designer shall refer to the approved Street Tree List. The following guidelines serve to create a visible community character that will foster a unique image: Planting Design: Within all residential projects, minimum 24" box size street trees shall be planted as follows: 000134 Resolution No. PC -2004- Page 31 a. Cul -de -sac: minimum one tree per street frontage (maximum thirty feet (30') on center). b. Interior Lot: minimum one tree per street frontage (maximum thirty feet (30') on center). C. Corner Lot: minimum three trees per street frontage (maximum thirty feet (30') on center). 12.4 Streetscape Concept The Streetscape Concept is the primary landscape framework for the City of Moorpark. The intention is to establish the theme for each major street in the City. The streetscape components consist of sidewalks, street trees, landscape areas behind the sidewalk, and median islands where they occur. Larger specimen trees should be planted at highly - visible focal points, such as entry gates, major intersections and other landmarks. Median islands along arterials should be planted with the same palette as adjacent parkways. A different, but complementary palette should be used along collector streets within the project and another different, but complementary palette along residential streets. Each palette may differ from area to area, but they should reflect the theme which is established by the arterial and collector streets. The designer shall verify final tree selection with the Community Development Director. 12.5 Walls and Fencing The perimeter wall acts as a divider between residential and commercial areas from a street. The wall blocks noise and creates privacy. The treatment of wall can add special dimension to the streetscape concept. The design of walls should be consistent throughout neighborhoods of the City to create a community theme. The following are guidelines for walls which are located along streets, public space, the rear street of double frontage lots, and the side street yard of double frontage lots: a. Wall niches are prohibited. A minimum five -foot (5') planter area shall be provided for trees, shrubs and vines adjacent to all walls. b. Chain link, plastic and wood fencing is not permitted, except in rural areas, subject to Community Development Director approval. C. The minimum wall setback shall be determined by the Conditions of Approval for the project. Walls shall vary in setback to provide areas for landscape features that create interest and reduce the linear aspect of appearance of a walled street. d. Use of decorative masonry block, pilaster, wrought iron and other decorative treatments are required. e. Precision concrete is not permitted for walls adjacent to a street. f. The texture and color of walls shall match the theme of the development or adjacent surroundings. g. In residential areas the wall height shall be a minimum of six feet (6') when located in a street sideyard. Wall heights in excess of six feet (6') shall require adjacent landscaping on the street side to soften the overall height. h. Walls over six feet (6) high and retaining walls over three feet (3') high require certification by a Registered Engineer. 000135 Resolution No. PC -2004- Page 32 The use of vines, shrubs, and trees shall be required to break the monotonous pattern of the wall. Landscaping shall be approved by the Community Development Director. 000136 Resolution No. PC -2004- Page 33 ATTACHMENT I LANDSCAPE PLAN REVIEW CHECKLIST (GENERAL REQUIREMENTS) APPLICANT'S NAME: PROJECT NAME: PERMIT /ENTITLEMENT NUMBER(S): DATE: 1. ENGINEER'S PRECISE OR ROUGH GRADING PLAN MUST BE INCLUDED WITH SUBMITTAL. 2. PLANS ARE PREPARED BY A CALIFORNIA LICENSED LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT'S SEAL IS ON ALL SHEETS. (ALL SHEETS MUST BE WET SIGNED FOR FINAL APPROVAL) 3. LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT'S COMPANY NAME, ADDRESS, AND PHONE NUMBER ON ALL SHEETS. 4. OWNER'S NAME, ADDRESS AND PHONE NUMBER ON ALL SHEETS. 5. SHEET INDEX ON TITLE SHEET. 6. ALL SHEETS CLEARLY LABELED. 7. VICINITY MAP AND LOCATION MAP WITH PROJECT SITE CLEARLY IDENTIFIED. 8. NORTH ARROW AND SCALE ON ALL APPLICABLE SHEETS. 9. `LANDSCAPE INSPECTION SCHEDULE' ON TITLE SHEET (SEE ATTACHED) 10. SIGNATURE BLOCK ON TITLE SHEET (SEE ATTACHED) 11. ALL PROPERTY LINES, EASEMENTS, PUBLIC R.O.W., SIDEWALKS, CURBS AND GUTTERS ARE CLEARLY IDENTIFIED. 12. ALL SLOPES, INCLUDE TOP AND TOE, ARE CLEARLY IDENTIFIED. 13. ALL SITE UTILITIES ARE CLEARLY IDENTIFIED. 14. ALL EXISTING AND PROPOSED STRUCTURES ARE CLEARLY IDENTIFIED. NOTATION IS INCLUDED IDENTIFYING WHICH STRUCTURES ARE TO BE REMOVED AND WHICH WILL BE PROTECTED IN PLACE. 15. ALL EXISTING AND PROPOSED TREES AND SHRUBS ARE CLEARLY LABELED. NOTATION IS INCLUDED IDENTIFYING WHICH ARE TO BE REMOVED AND WHICH WILL BE PROTECTED IN PLACE. COMMENTS: o oOIL3'7 Resolution No. PC -2004- Page 34 LANDSCAPE PLAN REVIEW CHECKLIST (SLOPE PLANTING PLAN REQUIREMENTS) APPLICANT'S NAME: PROJECT NAME: PERMIT /ENTITLEMENT NUMBER(S): DATE: 1. A HORTICULTURAL SOILS ANALYSIS WITH RECOMMENDATIONS IS ATTACHED TO THE PLANS. THE SOILS ANALYSIS IS PERFORMED BY A LABORATORY OF THE CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF AGRICULTURAL LABORATORIES. SOIL SAMPLE IS TAKEN AFTER SITE GRADING AND DATE IS INCLUDED ON THE REPORT. 2. ALL SLOPES GREATER THAN 3' VERTICAL HEIGHT ARE PLANTED WITH GROUNDCOVER FROM CUTTINGS, SHRUBS AND TREES. HYDROMULCH IS USED IN AREAS ONLY WITH PRIOR CITY APPROVAL. 3. ALL SLOPES GREATER THAN 5' VERTICAL HEIGHT ARE INSTALLED WITH JUTE MESH OR EQUAL. 4. SHRUBS ON SLOPES ARE PLANTED AT A MINIMUM OF 1 SHRUB PER 100 SQUARE FEET. 5. ALL SLOPES ADJACENT TO MAJOR ROADS, `ENTRY' TO PROJECTS SITES AND OTHER HIGHLY VISIBLE AREAS ARE `ENHANCED' WITH SHRUBS AND TREES THAT EXCEED THE MINIMUM QUANTITY AND SIZE REQUIREMENT. 6. TREES ON SLOPES ARE PLANTED AT A MINIMUM OF 1 TREE PER 350 SQUARE FEET. 7. A CALCULATION IS PROVIDED SHOWING TOTAL SLOPE LANDSCAPE AREA, TOTAL NUMBER OF TREES WITH TREE SIZES AND TOTAL NUMBER OF SHRUBS WITH SHRUB SIZES. 8. PLANT MATERIAL IS SUITABLE FOR CLIMATIC CONDITIONS. 9. PLANT MATERIAL IS SUITABLE FOR SLOPE AREAS. 10. PLANT MATERIAL IS CONSISTENT WITH CITY APPROVED PLANT LIST. 11. MINIMUM TREE SIZES ON SLOPES IS 15 GALLON. 12. MINIMUM SHRUB SIZES ON SLOPES IS (60 %) 5 GAL., (40 %) 1 GAL. 13. PLANS MUST CALL FOR A NINETY (90) DAY MAINTENANCE PERIOD TO BE PAID FOR BY OWNER. 14. PLANS CLEARLY IDENTIFY PLANT LOCATIONS. oOO138 Resolution No. PC -2004- Page 35 15. PLANT QUANTITY AND SIZES ARE CLEARLY IDENTIFIED ON THE PLANS AND IN LEGEND. 16. PLANTING LEGEND IDENTIFIES BOTANICAL AND COMMON NAME. 17. GROUNDCOVER SPACING IS SHOWN IN THE LEGEND. 18. HYDROSEED MIX IS INCLUDED IF APPLICABLE. MIX IDENTIFIES SEED TYPE AND LBS. /ACRE. 19. PLANTING DETAILS ARE CONSISTENT WITH CITY STANDARDS. 20. PLANTING NOTES AND SPECIFICATIONS ARE PROVIDED. 21. NOTATION IS INCLUDED THAT TREES PLANTED WITHIN 10' OF SIDEWALK, CURB OR OTHER HARDSCAPE AREAS MUST HAVE A LINEAR ROOT BARRIER INSTALLED. ROOTBARRIER MUST EXTEND 5 FEET IN BOTH DIRECTIONS FROM THE CENTER OF THE TREE AND BE A MINIMUM OF 24" DEPTH. COMMENTS: 0001.39 Resolution No. PC -2004- Page 36 LANDSCAPE PLAN REVIEW CHECKLIST (PLANTING PLAN REQUIREMENTS) APPLICANT'S NAME: PROJECT NAME: PERMIT /ENTITLEMENT NUMBER(S): DATE: 1. A HORTICULTURAL SOILS ANALYSIS WITH RECOMMENDATIONS IS ATTACHED TO THE PLANS. THE SOILS ANALYSIS IS PERFORMED BY A LABORATORY OF THE CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF AGRICULTURAL LABORATORIES. SOIL SAMPLE IS TAKEN AFTER SITE GRADING AND DATE IS INCLUDED ON THE REPORT. 2. ALL ABOVE GROUND UTILITIES ARE SHOWN WITH ADEQUATE PLANT SCREENING OR CAMOUFLAGING. 3. ALL MAINTENANCE STAGING AREAS AND UTILITARIAN STRUCTURES SUCH AS TRASH ENCLOSURES AND MAINTENANCE BUILDINGS ARE SHOWN WITH ADEQUATE PLANT SCREENING. 4. PLANT MATERIAL IS SUITABLE FOR CLIMATIC CONDITIONS. 5. PLANT MATERIAL IS CONSISTENT WITH CITY APPROVED PLANT LIST. 6. MINIMUM SHRUB SIZES ARE MET. 7. ALL PLANTING AREAS ADJACENT TO MAJOR ROADS, `ENTRY' TO PROJECTS SITES AND OTHER HIGHLY VISIBLE AREAS ARE `ENHANCED' WITH SHRUBS AND TREES THAT EXCEED THE MINIMUM QUANTITY AND SIZE REQUIREMENT. 8. PLANS MUST CALL FOR A NINETY (90) DAY MAINTENANCE PERIOD TO BE PAID FOR BY OWNER. 9. PLANS CLEARLY IDENTIFY PLANT LOCATIONS. 10. PLANT QUANTITIES AND SIZES ARE CLEARLY IDENTIFIED ON THE PLANS AND IN LEGEND. 11. PLANTING LEGEND IDENTIFIES BOTANICAL AND COMMON NAME. 12. GROUNDCOVER SPACING IS SHOWN IN THE LEGEND. 13. PLANTING DETAILS ARE CONSISTANT WITH CITY STANDARDS. 14. PLANTING NOTES /SPECIFICATIONS ARE PROVIDED. 15. NOTATION IS INCLUDED THAT ALL TREES PLANTED WITHIN 10' OF SIDEWALK, CURB OR OTHER HARDSCAPE AREAS MUST HAVE A LINEAR ROOT BARRIER INSTALLED. ROOT BARRIER MUST EXTEND 5 FEET IN BOTH DIRECTIONS FROM THE CENTER OF THE TREE AND BE A MINIMUM OF 24" DEPTH. 000140 Resolution No. PC -2004- Page 37 16. ALL STREET TREES ARE PLANTED MINIMUM 5' FROM WALKS OR OTHER HARDSCAPE AREAS. 17. ALL STREET TREES ARE PLANTED MINIMUM 10' FROM UTILITY POLES AND LIGHT STANDARDS, FIRE HYDRANTS, SEWERLINES AND UTILITY STRUCTURES. 18. ALL LOTS HAVE MINIMUM (1) ONE STREET TREE AND MINIMUM (1) SECONDARY TREE PER LOT. 19. ALL CORNER LOTS HAVE MINIMUM (3) THREE STREET TREES PER LOT. TREE SPACING DOES NOT EXCEED 30' ON CENTER. 20. ALL STREET TREES ARE MINIMUM 24" BOX SIZE. ALL SECONDARY TREES ARE MINIMUM 15- GALLON SIZE. 21. MINIMUM TREE QUANTITIES FOR MULTI - FAMILY OR COMMERCIAL PROJECTS IS ONE TREE PER 500 S.F. 22. TREE SIZES FOR MULTI - FAMILY OR COMMERCIAL PROJECTS IS 75% 24" BOX AND 25% 15- GALLON. 23. STREET TREE SPACING DOES NOT EXCEED 30' ON CENTER. 24. PARKING AREAS HAVE MINIMUM 50% SHADE COVERAGE AT 2/3 TREE MATURITY OR 15 -YEARS GROWTH OR ONE (1) TREE PER EVERY 4 STALLS IN A ROW. 25. PARKING AREA TREES ARE MINIMUM 24" BOX SIZE. 26. PARKING AREAS HAVE PLANTER `FINGERS' AND /OR ISLANDS AT THE TERMINUS OF ALL PARKING ROWS AND MINIMUM EVERY 100 LINEAL FEET AND EVERY 12 STALLS ADJACENT TO BUILDING FRONTAGES AND STREETS. 27. PARKS HAVE A MINIMUM OF 55 TREES PER GROSS ACRE. HOWEVER, THE MINIMUM REQUIREMENT MAY BE REDUCED IF THE PARK HAS `ACTIVE' RECREATIONAL ACTIVITIES. 28. PARK TREES ARE MINIMUM 40% 24" BOX AND 60% 15- GALLON. 29. A CALCULATION IS PROVIDED SHOWING TOTAL PROJECT AREA, TOTAL LANDSCAPED AREA, TOTAL NUMBER OF TREES WITH TREE SIZES AND TOTAL NUMBER OF SHRUBS WITH SHRUB SIZES. COMMENTS: 000141 Resolution No. PC -2004- Page 38 LANDSCAPE PLAN REVIEW CHECKLIST (IRRIGATION PLAN REQUIREMENTS) APPLICANT'S NAME: PROJECT NAME: PERMIT /ENTITLEMENT NUMBER(S): DATE: 1. THE IRRIGATION SYSTEM IS AUTOMATIC. 2. THE WORST CASE PRESSURE LOSS IS CALCULATED AND SHOWN FOR THE VALVE WITH THE MOST VOLUME, THE VALVE FARTHEST FROM THE WATER METER AND THE VALVE AT THE HIGHEST ELEVATION. 3. THE WATER USE CALCULATIONS ARE SHOWN ON THE PLANS. 4. AN IRRIGATION SCHEDULE IS PROVIDED AND SHOWN ON THE PLANS. THE IRRIGATION SCHEDULE IS DESIGNED SO THAT THE OPERATING WINDOW IS NOT WITHIN 8 HOURS OF PEAK DEMAND PERIODS. 5. NOTATION IS INCLUDED STATING THAT THE BACKFLOW DEVICE MUST BE TESTED A MINIMUM OF ONCE A YEAR. 6. IRRIGATION EQUIPMENT IS SHOWN IN SHRUB AREAS WITH ADEQUATE PLANT SCREENING. 7. THE LOCATIONS AND SIZES OF ALL WATER METERS ARE SHOWN. THE PLANS REFERENCE WHO IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE WATER METER AND HOOK -UP. 8. THE ELECTRICAL SOURCE FOR ALL CONTROLLERS IS SHOWN ON THE PLANS. THE PLANS REFERENCE WHO IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE ELECTRIC METER INSTALLATION. 9. THE ELECTRICAL REQUIREMENT FOR ALL BOOSTER PUMPS IS SHOWN ON THE PLANS. THE PLANS REFERENCE WHO IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE ELECTRIC METER INSTALLATION. 10. SPRAY HEADS ARE DESIGNED TO PROVIDE FULL COVERAGE. 11. ALL VALVES ARE DESIGNED WITH MATCHED PRECIPITATION RATES. 12. THE SYMBOL, MANUFACTURER, MODEL #, AND SIZE OF ALL IRRIGATION EQUIPMENT ARE CLEARLY LABELED IN THE LEGEND. 13. THE LOCATION OF ALL IRRIGATION EQUIPMENT IS CLEARLY IDENTIFIED ON THE PLAN. 14. THE BACKFLOW PREVENTER IS IDENTIFIED IN THE LEGEND WITH A POWDER COATED MESH ENCLOSURE WITH ROUNDED CORNERS. THE MODEL # AND SIZE OF THE ENCLOSURE IS CLEARLY LABELED. 000142 Resolution No. PC -2004- Page 39 15. THE MASTER VALVE AND FLOW METER (IF APPLICABLE) ARE IDENTIFIED IN THE LEGEND WITH MODEL # AND SIZE CLEARLY LABELED. 16. SPRAY HEADS ARE LISTED IN THE LEGEND WITH SYMBOL, MANUFACTURER, MODEL #, RADIUS, FLOW, PRESSURE AND PRECIPITATION RATE. 17. ROTOR HEADS ARE LISTED IN THE LEGEND WITH NOZZLES GROUPED FOR MATCHED PRECIPITATION RATES. 18. DETAILS ARE CONSISTENT WITH CITY STANDARDS. 19. IRRIGATION SPECIFICATIONS ARE INCLUDED. 20. THE CLASS AND /OR SCHEDULE FOR MAINLINE, LATERAL LINE, AND IRRIGATION SLEEVES IS SHOWN IN THE LEGEND. 21. THE SIZE OF THE MAINLINE, LATERAL LINE AND IRRIGATION SLEEVES IS SHOWN ON THE PLAN. 22. VALVE CALLOUTS IDENTIFY THE STATION AND CONTROLLER #, VALVE SIZE AND MAXIMUM GPM. 23. OPERATING PRESSURE IS WITHIN MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS. 24. FLOW VELOCITIES DO NOT EXCEED 5' PER SECOND. 25. IRRIGATION SYSTEM IS MATCHED PER INDIVIDUAL HYDROZONE. 26. TOP AND BOTTOM OF SLOPES MUST BE IRRIGATED SEPARATELY. 27. EQUIPMENT USED IS WITHIN MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS. 28. ALL PIPES AND WIRES UNDER PAVING MUST BE SLEEVED. SLEEVES MUST BE OF SUFFICIENT SIZE FOR NUMBER OF WIRES AND SIZE OF PIPE (MINIMUM 2x'S DIAMETER OF PIPE ENCLOSED). 29. POP -UP HEADS ARE INSTALLED ADJACENT TO PEDESTRIAN TRAFFIC. SYSTEM MUST BE DESIGNED TO MINIMIZE OVERSPRAY. 30. RISER HEADS ARE NOT INSTALLED WHERE HIGHLY VISIBLE FROM PUBLIC VIEW. 31. HEAD RADIUS MUST NOT BE REDUCED MORE THAN 15% OF NOZZLE SIZE TO MINIMIZE OVERSPRAY. COMMENTS: x 00143 Resolution No. PC -2004- Page 40 LANDSCAPE PLAN REVIEW CHECKLIST LANDSCAPE INSPECTION REQUIREMENTS (CITY MAINTAINED AND MASTER ASSOCIATION AREAS) SCHEDULE: THE CITY'S LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT WILL INSPECT CONSTRUCTION FOR COMPLIANCE WITH APPROVED PLANS. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE CITY'S LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE OF EACH OF THE REQUIRED INSPECTION: 1. PRESSURE TEST OF IRRIGATION MAINLINE. TO BE COMPLETED PRIOR TO BACKFILLING TRENCHES. 2. IRRIGATION COVERAGE TESTS. COVERAGE TEST SHALL BE COMPLETED PRIOR TO ANY PLANTING. 3. AFTER TREES AND SHRUBS ARE SPOTTED, BUT PRIOR TO PLANTING. 4. UPON COMPLETION OF THE LANDSCAPE PLANS. PRELIMINARY ACCEPTANCE MAY BE GRANTED AT THIS TIME. 5. FINAL INSPECTION: AT THE START OF THE ONE -YEAR MAINTENANCE PERIOD OR AS SPECIFIED BY THE CITY'S PLANNING DEPARTMENT. 6. FINAL ACCEPTANCE: AT THE END OF THE ONE -YEAR MAINTENANCE PERIOD OR AS SPECIFIED BY THE CITY'S PLANNING DEPARTMENT. 000144 Resolution No. PC -2004- Page 41 LANDSCAPE PLAN REVIEW CHECKLIST LANDSCAPE INSPECTION REQUIREMENTS (SUB- ASSOCIATION, COMMERCIAL AND ON -SITE AREAS) SCHEDULE: THE CITY'S LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT WILL INSPECT CONSTRUCTION FOR COMPLIANCE WITH APPROVED PLANS. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE CITY'S LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE OF EACH OF THE REQUIRED INSPECTIONS: 1. IRRIGATION COVERAGE TESTS. COVERAGE TEST SHALL BE COMPLETED PRIOR TO ANY PLANTING. 2. UPON COMPLETION OF THE LANDSCAPE PLANS. FINAL ACCEPTANCE MAY BE GRANTED AT THIS TIME. ©®0145 Resolution No. PC -2004- Page 42 LANDSCAPE PLAN REVIEW CHECKLIST CITY APPROVAL BLOCK (Must be included on Title Sheet) APPROVED CITY OF MOORPARK These plans have been reviewed and found to be in compliance with relevant sections of the Moorpark Municipal Code and the Conditions of Approval for (Permit Case No) and (Permit Case No.). Landscaping and Irrigation shall be installed on the subject property substantially as shown herein. Approved by: Community Development Director OoOIL46 Resolution No. PC -2004- Page 43 ATTACHMENT II GENERAL RECOMMENDED PLANT LIST The City reserves the right to approve or reject any of the plant species listed at any time. Note that several plant species listed with an asterisk ( *) are included on the prohibited list. These plants are only intended to be installed in urban areas away from native hillsides or natural areas. Prior City approval is required. Trees *Acacia spp. Acacia baileyana Agonis flexuosa Albizia julibrissin Alnus rhombifolia Arbutus unedo Bauhinia variegata Brachychiton acerifolius Brachychiton populneus Callistemon citrinus Callistemon viminalis Cassia leptophylla Cedrus deodara Cercis occidentalis Chitalpa x tashkensis Cinnamomum Camphora Cupaniopsis Anacardiodes Cuppressocyparis leylandi Eriobotrya japonica Eriobotrya deflexa Eucalyptus camaldulensis Eucalyptus citriodora Eucalyptus polyanthemos Eucalyptus sideroxylon Fraxinus ornus `Raywood' Fraxinus veluntina `Modesto' Fraxinus veluntina `Rio Grande' Geijera parviflora Ginko biloba (Male only) Gleditsia triacanthos spp. Jacaranda mimosifolia Juglans hindsii Koelreuteria bipinnata Koelreuteria paniculata ncn Bailey Acacia Peppermint Myrtle Silk Tree White Alder Strawberry Tree Purple Orchid Tree Flame Tree Bottle Tree Lemon Bottlebrush Weeping Bottlebrush Gold Medallion Tree Deodar Cedar Western Redbud Chitalpa Camphor Tree Carrotwood Leyland Cypress Loquat Bronze Loquat Red Gum Lemon - scented Gum Silver Dollar Gum Red Iron Bark Raywood Ash Modesto Ash Rio Grande Ash Australian Willow Maidenhair Tree (grafted male) Honey Locust Jacaranda Northern California Black Walnut Chinese Flame Tree Golden Rain Tree 0®014'7 Resolution No. PC -2004- Page 44 Lagerstroemia indica Crape Myrtle Ligustrum japonicum Japanese Privet Liquidambar styraciflua (cultivars) Sweet Gum Liriodendron tulipifera Tulip Tree Lyonathamnus floribundus var. asplenifolius Island (Catalina) Ironwood Magnolia grandiflora var. Southern Magnolia Maytenus boaria `Green Showers' Showers Mayten Tree Melaleuca linarifolia Flaxleaf Paperbark Melaleuca styphelioides Black Tea Tree Melalueca quinquenervia Cajeput Tree Metrosideros excelsus New Zealand Christmas Tree *Nerium oleander (standard) Oleander Olea europaea (fruitless) Olive Photinia serrulata Chinese Photinia Pinus spp. Pine Pistacia chinensis Chinese Pistache Pittosporum rhombifolium Queensland Pittosporum Platanus acerifolia ` Bloodgood' Bloodgood Plane Tree Platanus acerifolia ` Yarwood' Yarwood Plane Tree Platanus racemosa California Sycamore Podocarpus gracilior Fern Pine Podocarpus macrophyllus Yew Pine Populus fremontii Western Cottonwood Prunus cerasifera Atropurpurea' Purple Leaf Plum Prunus cerasifera Krauter Vesuvius' Black -leaf Plum Prunus lyonii Catalina Cherry Pyrus calleyana `Aristocrat' Aristocrat Pear Pyrus calleryana `Bradford' Bradford Pear Pyrus calleyana `Capitol' Capitol Pear Pyrus calleyana `Red Spire' Red Spire Pear Pyrus calleyana `Chanticleer' Chanticleer Pear Pyrus kawakamii Evergreen Pear Quercus spp. Oak Quercus agrifolia Coast Live Oak Quercus engelmanii Mesa Oak Quecus ilex Holly Oak Quercus lobata Valley Oak Quercus suber Cork Oak Quecus virginiana Southern Live Oak Rhaphiolepis `Majestic Beauty' Rhaphiolepis Tree *Rhus lancea African Sumac *Robinia (tree form) Locust Sapium sebiferum Chinese Tallow Tree Sequoia sempervirens Coast Redwood Sophora japonica Japanese Pagoda Tree Tabebuia chrysotricha Gold Trumpet Tree oOO148 Resolution No. PC -2004- Page 45 Tabebuia impetiginosa Tristania conferta Ulmus parvifolia Shrubs Abelia grandiflora Agave spp. Arbutus unedo `Compacta' Arctostaphylos densiflora Artemisia spp. Calliandra inaequilatera Callistemon spp. Callistemon citrinus Cassia artemisiodes Ceanothus spp. Cistus spp. Cistus purpureus Cuphea hyssopifolia Dodonaea viscosa'Purpurea' Echium Fastuosum *Elaeagnus spp. Eriogonum crocatum Escallonia spp. Feijoa sellowiana Fremontodendron spp. Fremontodendron `California Glory' Grevillea noelii Heteromeles arbutifolia Kniphofia uvaria Leucophyllum frutescens `Compacta' Ligustrum lucidium Mahonia `Golden Abundance' Mahonia nevinii Myrtus communis *Nerium oleander Pittosporum spp. Photinia fraseri Prunus caroliniana Prunus ilicifolia Prunus lyonnii Punica granatum Rhapheolepis indica Rhamnus alaternus Pink Trumpet Tree Brisbane Box Evergreen Elm Abelia Agave Dwarf Strawberry Tree Manzanita Wormwood Pink Powder Puff Bottlebrush Lemon Bottlebrush Feathery Cassia California Lilac Rockrose Orchid Rockrose False Heather Purple Hopseed Bush Pride of Madiera Elaegnus Conejo Buckwheat Escallonia Pineapple Guava Flannel Bush 'California Glory' Fremontia Noel's Grevillea Toyon Red Hot Poker Texas Ranger Glossy Privet 'Golden Abundance' Oregon Grape Nevin's Barberry Myrtle Oleander Mock Orange (some species) Photinia Carolina Cherry Hollyleaf Cherry Catalina Cherry Pomegranate India Hawthorne Italian Buckthorn oOO149 Resolution No. PC -2004- Page 46 Rhamnus california `Eve Case' `Eve Case' Coffeeberry Rhamnus crocea ilicifolia Hollyleaf Coffeeberry Rhus integrifolia Lemonade Berry Rhus ovata Sugar Bush Romneya coulteri Matilija Poppy Salvia spp. Sage Senecio cineraria Dusty Miller Sollya heterophylla Australian Bluebells Tagetes lemmonii Mexican Bush Marigold Tamarix pentandra, T. parviflora Salt Cedar Tamarisks Tecomaria capensis Cape Honeysuckle Westringia rosmariniformis Westringia Xylosma congestum Shiny Xylosma Yucca spp. Yucca Umbrellularia californica California Laurel Ground and Slope Cover *Acacia redolens prostrate Prostrate Acacia Achillea spp. Yarrow Arctostaphylos spp. Manzanita Arctotheca calendula Yellow capeweed Baccharis pilularis Dwarf Coyote Brush Baccharis `Twin Peaks' or `Pigeon Point' Coyote Brush Bougainvillea spp. Bougainvillea Ceanothus spp. California Lilac Cerastium tomentosum Snow in Summer Cistus spp. Rockrose Convolvulus cneorem Bush Morning Glory Coreopsis aruiculata `Nana' Dwarf Coreopsis *Cotoneaster spp. Cotoneaster Euonymus fortunei radicans Common Winter Creeper Gazania hybrids Gazania hybrids Grevillea `Noelli' Noel Grevillea Hypericum calycinum Creeping St. John's Wort Ice Plant varieties Ice Plant Iris douglasiana Pacific Coast Iris Lantana montevidensis and hybrids Lavender Lantana and hybrids Limonium pectinatum Petite Sea Lavender Lonicera japonica halliana Hall's Honeysuckle Myoporum pacificum Prostrate Myoporum Myoporum parvifolium Prostrate Myoporum Optunia spp. Prickly Pear Osteopermum fructicosum Trailing African Daisy Pyracantha spp. Firethorn 000150 Resolution No. PC -2004- Page 47 Ribes viburnifolium Catalina Perfume Rosa banksiae Lady Bank's Rose Rosmarinus officinalis ` Prostrata' Dwarf Rosemary Tecomaria capensis Cape Honeysuckle Teucrium chamaedrys `Prostratum' Prostrate Germander Trachelospermum jasminoides Star Jasmine *Vinca spp. Periwinkle Flowering Plants, Perennials and Accent Plants Achillea spp. Yarrow Agave spp. Century Plant Aloe arborescens Tree Aloe Aloe nobilis Dwarf Aloe Aloe spp. Aloe Asparagus sprengeri Asparagus Fern Asparagus myeri Myer's Asparagus Centranthus ruber Red Valerian Chamaerops humilis Mediterranean Fan Palm Cistus spp. Rockrose Convolvulus cneorum Bush Morning Glory Coreopsis auriculata Golden Coreopsis Coreposis verticillata Thread- leafed Coreopsis Cotinus coggygria Smoke Tree Dietes spp. Fortnight Lily Echium fastuosum Pride of Madeira Eriogonum spp. Buckwheat Escallonia spp. Escallonia Fremontodendron spp. Flannel Bush Helianthes tuberosus Jerusalem Artichoke Hemerocallis hybrids Daylily Kniphofia uvaria Red Hot Poker Lantana spp. Lantana Lavandula spp. Lavender Limonium perezii Sea Lavender Werium oleander Oleander Oenothera speciosa childsii Mexican Evening Primrose *Pennisetum setaceum Fountain Grass Penstemon hybrids California Penstemon Plumbago auriculata Cape Plumbago Portulaca grandiflora Rose Moss Romneya coulteri Matilija Poppy Rosa spp. Rose Senecio cineraria Dusty Miller *Spartium spp. Broom 0®0151. Resolution No. PC -2004- Page 48 Teucrium fruiticans Bush Germander Tulbaghia violacea Society Garlic Vitis spp. Grape Yucca gloriosa Soft -tip Yucca Yucca recurvifolia Curveleaf Yucca Vines Bougainvillea cultivars Bougainvillea cultivars Campsis spp. Trumpet Creeper Clytostoma callistegiodes Violet Trumpet Vine Distictis buccinatorius Scarlet Trumpet Vine Hardenbergia comptoniana Lilac Vine Hibbertia scandens Guinea Gold Vine Jasminum spp. Jasmine Macfadyena unguis -cati Cats Claw Parthenocissus tricuspidata Boston Ivy Rosa spp. Climbing Rose Solandra maxima Cup of Gold Vine Solanum!asminoides Potato Vine Tecomana capensis Cape Honeysuckle Vitis vinifera Wine Grape Wisteria spp. Wisteria 000152 Resolution No. PC -2004- Page 49 ATTACHMENT III INVASIVE AND PROHIBITED PLANT LIST The following undesirable plant species are not to be used near or adjacent to native vegetation or around drainage courses that terminate at natural areas. It should be noted that several of the plant species listed may be considered for use in an urban environment where the risk of escape is clearly negligible only with prior approval from city's landscape architect. Botanical Name Acacia spp. Acacia Cyclops Acacia longifolia Acacia melanoxylon Ageratina adenophora Agrostis stolonifera Ailanthus altissima Ammophila arenaria Andropogon virginicus Anthriscus caucalis Aponogeton distachyon Aptenia cordifolia Arundo donax Atriplex sembiccata Avena barbata Avena fatua Berula erecta Brassica nigra Brassica rapa Brassica toumefortii Bromus diandrus Bromus hordeaceus Bromus madritensis Bromus tectorum Carderia chalapense Carderia draba Carderia pubescens Carduus pycnocephalus Carpobrotus edulis Catharanthus roseus Centaurea melitensis Centaurea solstitialis Ceratophyllum demersum Chenopodium album Chenopodium murale Chrysanthemum coronarium Cirsium arvense Cirsium vulgare Common Name Acacia Acacia Sydney golden or golden wattle Blackwood acacia Sticky eupatory Creeping bentgrass Tree of heaven European beachgrass Broomsedge bluestem Bur chervil Cape pondweed Baby sun rose Giant reed Australian saltbush Slender wild oat Wild oat Cutleaf water parsnip Black mustard Field mustard, Turnip Moroccan mustard Ripgut grass Soft chess Foxtail chess Cheatgrass Lens -pod Hoary cress White -top Italian thistle Hottentot -fig Madagascar periwinkle Tocalote Yellow star - thistle Aquatic hornwort Lamb's quarters, Pigweed Nettle- leaved goosefoot Garland or crown daisy Canada thistle Bull thistle 000153 Resolution No. PC -2004- Page 50 Conicosia pugioniformis Narrow - leaved ice plant Conium maculatum Poison hemlock Cortadena jubata Andean pampas grass, jubatagrass Cortaderia selloana Pampas grass Cotoneaster lacteus Cotoneaster Cotoneaster pannosus Cotoneaster Cotula coronopifolia Brass buttons Cynara cardunculus Artichoke thistle, Cardoon Cynodon dactylon Bermuda grass Cytisus scoparius Scotch broom Cytisus striatus Portuguese broom Datisca glomerata Durango root Delairia odorata (= Senecio milkanioides) Cape ivy (German ivy) Descurainia sophia Tansy mustard Egeria densa Brazilian waterweed Ehrharta calycina Veldt grass Eichhornia crassipes Water hyacinth Elaeagnus augustifolia Russian olive Elodea canadensis Common waterweed Erodium cicutarium Red - stemmed filaree Eucalyptus globulus Blue gum Euphorbia esula Leafy spurge Ficus carica Edible fig Foeniculum vulgare Fennel Genista monspessulana French broom (= Cytisus monspessulanus) Gunnera tinctoria Gunnera Hedera helix English ivy Hedera canadensis Algerian ivy Hippurus vulgaris Mare's tail Hirschfeldia incana Shortpod mustard Hordeum jubatum Foxtail barley Hydrilla verticillata Hydrilla Lactuca serriola Prickly lettuce Lepidium latifolium Perennial pepperweed Lobularia maritima Sweet alyssum Lupinus arboreus Bush lupine Lythrum spp. Loosestrife Lythrum hyssopifolium Loosestrife Lythrum salicaria Purple loosestrife Malva parviflora Cheeseweed, Little mallow Marrubium vulgare Horehound Melilotus alba White sweetclover Mentha pulegium Pennyroyal Mesembryanthemum crystallinum Crystalline iceplant Myoporum laetum Myoporum Myriophyllum aquaticum Parrot's feather Myriophyllum spicatum Eurasian milfoil Nerium oleander Oleander Nicotiana glauca Tree tobacco 000154 Resolution No. PC -2004- Page 51 Ottelia alismoides Ottelia Oxalis pes- caprae Bermuda buttercup Parentucellia viscosa Parentucellia Pennisetum clandestinum Kikuyu grass Pennisetum setaceum Fountain grass Phalaris aquatica Harding grass Phoenix dactylifera Date palm Phragmites australis (= communis) Common reed Phyla (= Lippia) nodiflora Lippia Picris echioides Bristly ox- tongue Piptatherum miliaceum Smilo grass Pistia stratiotes Water lettuce Poa pratensis Kentucky bluegrass Raphanus sativus Radish Ranunculus aquatilis var. aquatilis Water buttercup Ranunculus muricatus Buttercup Rhus lancea African Sumac Ricinus communis Castor bean Robinia pseudocacia Black locust Rorippa nasturtium - aquaticum Watercress Rubus procerus (= discolor) Himalayan blackberry Rumex conglomeratus Whorled dock Rumex crispus Curly dock Salix alba White willow Salsola spp. Tumbleweed Salsola soda Tumbleweed Salsola tragus Russian thistle, Tumbleweed Schinus molle Peruvian pepper tree Schinus terebinthifolius Brazilian pepper tree Scirpus spp. Bulrush, alkali bulrush Senecio mikanioides German -ivy Silybum marianum Milk thistle Sisymbrium irio London rocket Sisymbrium officinale Hedge mustard Sisymbrium orientale Oriental mustard Sonchus oleraceus Common sow thistle Sorghum halepense Johnsongrass Spartina alterniflora European /Atlantic cord grass Spartina densiflora Cord grass Spartina patens Cord grass Spartium junceum Spanish broom Taeniatherum caput - medusae Medusa -head Tamarix aphylla Athel Tamarix ramosissima, T. chinensis, Salt cedar, tamarisk T. gallica, T. parviflora Taraxacum officinale Common dandelion Tribulus terrestris Puncture vine Tropaeolum majus Garden nasurtium Ulex eruopaeus Gorse Varbascum spp. Mullein 000IL55 Resolution No. PC -2004- Page 52 Veronica ssp. (incl. V. Anagallis- aquatica, V. beccabunga, V. catenata) Vinca major Washingtonia filifera Xanthium spinosum Xanthium strumarium Zantedeschia aethiopica Speedwell, Brooklime Greater periwinkle Fan palm Spiny cocklebur Cocklebur Calla lily ' Sources include: California Native Plant Society. 1992. Non - native invasive plants in the Santa Monica Mountains; Dudley, T. 1998. Exotic plant invasions in California riparian areas and wetlands. Fremontia 26(4): 24 -29; California Exotic Pest Plant Council. 1996. List of exotic pest plants of greatest ecological concern in California. 000156 Resolution No. PC -2004- Page 53 ATTACHMENT IV RECOMMENDED TREES FOR STREETS The City reserves the right to approve or reject any of the plant species listed at any time. Note that several plant species listed are included on the prohibited list. These plants are only intended to be installed in urban areas away from native hillsides or natural areas. Prior City approval is required. Trees Agonis flexuosa Arbutus unedo Bauhinia variegata Brachychiton populneus Callistemon citrinus Callistemon viminalis Cassia excelsa Cassia leptophylla Chitalpa x tashkentensis Cinnamomum Camphora Eriobotrya deflexa Fraxinus ornus ` Raywood' Geijera parviflora Ginko biloba (Male only) Gleditsia triacanthos `var.' Jacaranda mimosifolia Koelreuteria bipinnata Koelreuteria paniculata Lagerstroemia indica Liriodendron tulipifera Magnolia grandiflora var. Maytenus boaria `Green Showers' Melaleuca linarifolia Melalueca quinquenervia Photinia serrulata Pinus eldarica Pinus halepensis Pinus pinea Pistacia chinensis Pittosporum phillyraeoides Platanus acerifolia `Bloodgood' Platanus acerifolia ` Yarwood' Podocarpus glacilior Podocarpus macrophyllus Prunus cerasifera Atropurpurea' Prunus c. Krauter Vesuvius' Prunus serrulata Amanogawa' Pyrus calleryana Aristocrat' Peppermint Myrtle Strawberry Tree Purple Orchid Tree Bottle Tree Lemon Bottlebrush Weeping Bottlebrush Crown of Gold Tree Gold Medallion Tree Chitalpa Camphor Tree Bronze Loquat Raywood Ash Australian Willow Maidenhair Tree (grafted male) Honey Locust Jacaranda Chinese Flame Tree Golden Rain Tree Crape Myrtle Tulip Tree Southern Magnolia Showers Mayten Tree Flaxleaf Paperbark Cajeput Tree Chinese Photinia Mondell Pine Aleppo Pine Italian Stone Pine Chinese Pistache Willow Pittosporum London Plane Yarwood Plane Tree Fern Pine Yew Pine Purple Leaf Plum Black -leaf Plum Columnar Flowering Cherry Aristocrat Pear oOO157 Resolution No. PC -2004- Page 54 Pyrus calleryana `Bradford' Pyrus calleryana `Chanticleer' Pyrus kawakamii Quercus agrifolia Quecus ilex Rhus lancea Robinia (tree form) Sapium sebiferum Sophora japonica Tristania conferta Ulmus parvifolia Bradford Pear Chanticleer Pear Evergreen Pear Coast Live Oak Holly Oak African Sumac Locust Chinese Tallow Tree Japanese Pagoda Tree Brisbane Box Evergreen Elm 000ss8 Resolution No. PC -2004- Page 55 ATTACHMENT V REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT FOR LANDSCAPE PLAN REVIEW PERMIT /ENTITLEMENT NUMBER(S): I, the undersigned Applicant, hereby authorize the City of Moorpark, California to review the Landscape Plans submitted for the above referenced permit/entitlement request(s) in accordance with the City of Moorpark Ordinance Code. I am herewith depositing in accordance with adopted fee schedule to cover consultant review (plus 15% city administrative charge), staff review, coordination and processing, the unused portion of the deposit will be refunded to me. I further understand that, if the final cost is more than the deposit fee, I shall pay the balance due. Name of Applicant *: Phone: Please print or type Address of Applicant_ (Do not use P.O. Box) Phone: Name of Corporation or Agency Address of Corporation or Agency (Do not use P.O. Box) Signature Date *If corporation or agency, list person(s) authorized to act on behalf of corporation or agency. 000159 Resolution No. PC -2004- Page 56 ATTACHMENT VI APPLICANT'S LANDSCAPE CONSULTANT'S CHECKLIST AND CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE Project Number Landscape Contractor: Landscape Architect: Applicant: Assessor's Parcel No.: I certify that: Post - Installation Inspection: (check to indicate compliance) ❑ A. Plants installed as specified including proper staking & root control boxes ❑ B. Soils amended as noted in soils report (Invoices attached) ❑ C. Irrigation system installed as designed an adjusted ❑ D. Reduced as -built plans in controllers ❑ E. As -built plans provided to owner /manager ❑ F. Backflow Prevention Test I certify that this project complies with the City of Moorpark Landscape Design Standards and guidelines. The landscape planting and irrigation installation conform to the approved plans and specifications with the following exceptions: (Itemize all exceptions on attached sheets) Signature, Applicant's Landscape State License Number Architect of Record CITY OF MOORPARK Landscape Consultant Verification Date I certify that this project: ❑ Complies, ❑ Does not comply, with the approved Landscape Plans with the following exceptions: (Use attached sheets, if necessary) Signature, City's Consultant State License Number Date 000ILGO Resolution No. PC -2004- Page 57 o v r ALL 1 WAS FOR 16 6AL 2X REz, Aw (i) rOK W OR �R rRE4M.. KEY t Fuaw r 6WAPC f:rL FORM OR E.Q, M AJ"NT I "Ara (r6° (. PFR -IA'11,6" pM, fr F APB"' Cam% ANA 6f- EATER) NAME WL 6 W" LL MIX " 6OLS ANALY ,505) 6E r {d444�R. 4 ► i .. '.�JRE TO F w' � �r: 61-0 13 PIAL F 4 .A6TIG rR CA N rL. ( c ° r4 R 1EK AWE r Ai L f�A M F rAPPS6WE SkWACE rl A" �a rP FIFE -,W* � 44 FLTER ff*RMG 0 1,14" 14 PVC GAF" -�L" nrsAc pmrowm. RF. 60MMAT1L - GtTY Armoym Rte" WRIMS 6 uu V- 4 TA WA_L6 AFp G JR _iG, , .AR a31 1�•T I .tea. T1RF.e PLf+NTINC, PZ? AII. d$*LA71! 1 -I) ,_;:` City of Moorpark Tree Planting Detail Plate 1 -1 Planning Division OOOILG1 Resolution No. PC -2004- Page 58 -- — - i Kt!'( rNts" P 'Oorm-L PE-oprzt- ARLUV tAtr rqe,,rAL WiN f' M.ON FIN&I CRAM r)VV-AL TPEE TU ArT,�4*1 TO Nik4K AT FW91 ERAVE dal r rArt T aCY *'OTIF N ,: - WmE�, rFZE-3 Pt�PtNP55 ai �-5Mti(,R,FtE AW MW E>F4%W., Ti f LkVI-56,APE. ARMIWT RffCKW�5 TIt RX,-Jlr T 1 TM Ftw Pf4fsL'N 1Z6&*Vrk? EANNO PE4mztmNT- 7KRI! 1-2) City of Moorpark Tree Guying Detail Plate 1-2 Planning Division 000IL62 Resolution No. PC -2004- Page 59 4�r RWf'P&L KEY I r*050f Cf4VE 2 Ra"TrAL k-,W,,FcVM M Ez�, F1.44'r TAV; (rbP J�j 6 F?40r IWI-A Ft -YL, 0 FtR fo FTF AW e$�PEATFIR) r0FORARY 0:- YVATEP-W Dy-�N mrrvt -vL W"LL mix R a' AEN, MM TVII,5, �AN 4 F 6ECURZ TO CLZ W/yak ARV%L I- PIA TRtAT Mm �Aow 114 TLFr KoorPOLL N� --',MkL EXTEW NrO - PUACC M—MANU M5 A64OWN& To MAKU RIFt ;aAYtWAtk?N5. - CC-� *rROvtV PZY67 f�AWIEFS 99J.L X P46T&LF.P ON A", MEE$ YA"ThVL4 .44, WAJQ6, PRNEMAY5, WAJ-15, AW vqWF, ttWV6e,AM AKF-A6 ANP '*!-rRUL,TLRt!�; ON 9L.00FE ME7AIL (fP'-A7'0 1-5) .... ...... City of Moorpark Tree Planting on Slope Detail Plate 1-3 Planning F lanning Division 0001 1 Resolution No. PC -2004- Page 60 0 o go 'Ov 00 0 S009 06, gyp. cp 0 Goo 0 o .9 x Fmr KEY z MM 6RAPE WATERNO WN RwrmL CrO W- FOVAP FFJOK Amw-mm m-mr TAps aR Bq. TO EW OF MAWMMM (rOP Lft of RWr M-L) 0 KATNE WL PM PM WKrLL 12R W" tCCa*A3.MTP A PM 0-6A— if PM WX OWANW) SAVIF SHPLUS FLANTINO CPICTAII. (PLATO' 1-4) FCity of Moorpark Shrub Planting Detail Pb %to 16 1-4 4 Planning Division Resolution No. PC -2004- Page 61 I 1 /,l x P 6r POOT r PMAAWKr 15A5+4 t f ! � L � 3.1 5 FL, r �l DET *L ( p . T'E 1 -5) F City of Moorpark Shrub on Slope Planting Detail Plate 1 -5 ' Planning Division 000165 Resolution No. 2004 - Page 62 Ocr*w% wQws eads, *v wnz r#'C WWX:S rO WSM GwArm fw4m VIOAY lk�"rwh 0 0 r* D VAL�r CO WgAm Ot, b0Z M*Aw WdM VOL��t #V *�?YALW N LOM .0 r 14 OWVCZMW� GCM PO "Mr. WJrA 0 zr X) I iVO AO MAO &L M Imo. -.44H &T mkz jo*Tm V%I& LAI"VL FM "t (D u0i -r c"'M 47 W�w wAqL Y--,% w KZ*079 COSTWOL 'VA,6VZ ;2 City of Moorpark Remote Control Planning Division Valve Detail F I Resolution No. 2004 - Page 63 KZY (D ce�%:N c^IA4TrAx w AT,?r` 44 WN LO*� tWA%6Zh L&*55, - PLNU TAM YAPE15 ro 9419MS) ,C- ,�) MA�7M YA-W. 04 WTALL rZ NO, UN I R*e5r PORIT v c't OF V'W' aa�46' 4I Or 2) IN KAMATON 9r_'E46TA4r 6 m 50 Rtl._� I (44 CW) M6 LATrAAL LM FTY. RAI) WOLI! rAFt 6"PO. WFI-55 AT rEN rwr iNnpi.-fi MR rprAdIM10 AT ^6TF=T 4R-L Cla�'Ur L4�41 6T"IOWIP'_71 FOP W-Fr". W,"LL W"A. AW WWOVTia4 REqJFZO&W� ''. W4(FU O-AL M a.WkTEP H_-,ZH ThAT NO, IttfrLU-., 06&R6 AUER FVWI!Lr ck;t�m. - FOR LATEFA_ LRC AW 4 KM*M To TFMWmtN& pCTAj_/jRReATj6N *-t,(: rVArkq45 N(AM't& OfM F(a City of Moorpark Anti-Siphon I Plate 2-2 Planning Division Valve Detail 000167 Resolution No. 2004 - Page 64 ffi'�;; . PALL VA.�t OPA"-5 T DRA95 t* Th, K-'fA pfw,- �rYFI I , $- Itit"It OR.AM. W4: mkogyz ,,;: , City of Moorpark Backf low Preventer Detail Plate 2 -3 '�� Planning Division o00168 Resolution No. 2004 - Page 65 I A—\ KEY aNy ftftUR FN4. cneV OV NFRE eU klpve, :,ai Ac, 15TREEr B-L Zf1 15 ft,L 40 Rf CP ;N4 L-AmRk F'VE 5U55� eft (f%.AT 9 2 -A) .-.---!!jn ........ .. .... City of Moorpark Bubbler Detail Plate 2-4 Planning Division] 000169 Resolution No. 2004-_ Page 66 KEY OP6POE* M&N -tP PV(, 60, 40 e-,T-RffT EU �6e w, to-nz w, CO) -.9TPTZT El I FVC, �rEAAL LIC ANP FIMW11-5 (D 0 City of Moorpark Pop-Up Rotor Detail Plate 2 -5 Planning Division 000170 -1 Resolution No. 2004 - Page 67 �� 6m W Ownx Lrm" 06 RrAOw PWPNWAJLW ra qOT )F%, W ML. ,w*k= fnn=T, ru wm-r W )PVC. LArtl� LW *45 r1rrI419 )rt*21 ORge - 1L4 MAX 6K ca ROTOR ON 5LO10P. VZT,*L, fv�-A'rg 2-6) City of Moorpark Rotor on Slope Detail Plate 2-6 Planning Division 001 1] _;6 F 000171L Resolution No. 2004 - Page 68 U�' 6A 'NkL 6FIRAY MAP P' 6441 AO bL 4a oirPf!tT'tLL T Nc, r M M. f3k PVC; 'L . Fig 1 , :7T 1 A5 ReqLwap, 6" om) FI F ity of Moorpark Pop- Up Spray lanning Division Plate 2 -7 Head Detail 000172 Resolution No. 2004 - Page 69 �I K159K ZFWKAIY Kff 0 T ICn CAI), mp-50 �PKAM 0R� rVAP pvc. 1�m r"O' NPPLE Q�fJOT-" A15 CEP) 0,3 F%,e, CA,,A A.17 ELL, O�N'� " 40 '5rRtI—*IIr EIL 0�5 M, LATYA, FlIt' City of Moorpark Riser Spray Detail Plate 2;]-8 Planning Division 00oJ73 Resolution No. 2004 - Page 70 01" moasm 6r Uw W" vmme WOW mocew. -W -tvr To MOM Ire PwW yew N.T.5. TOP 0 %.Oe VIEW FENCE 91-OPE PLANTIN& N1 \/►F-^ r-1!NCr- (ELEVATION) (F-I&. 12. 1) City of Moorpark Slope Planting W/ View Fig. 12.1 74 Fp1anning Division I Fence (Elevation) 000l I Resolution No. 2004 - Page 71 4 1 W M*56m KEDW L LARbE VARY#6 W-&IT TM 4F aAWE C*WY TREIE; ON UNVER %OE LOW 5ROW246 0"U'S WmZrV,& TRM W-M GVEYAW LA"-W:S OR kA.PW EME TO SOFTEN AVHIr-61IAIP- ror 00 a-4pe 6C40N WA-L SLOPE FLANTINGY JN/ SCAMN Y4ALL (ELEVATION) (FIG. 12,2) City of Moorpark Slope Planting W/ Screen Fig. 12.2 Planning Division Wall (Elevation) 000175 P I I -- I- I Resolution No. 2004 - Page 72 PI.A,NTINC-w AT SIN&LE-FAMILY RESIVENCE (PLAN VIEVO.-OVICV. 12.5) City of Moorpark Slope Planting at Single-Family Fi 12.3 Q5 g. Planning Division Residence (Plan View) 000176 I 4 1- PI.A,NTINC-w AT SIN&LE-FAMILY RESIVENCE (PLAN VIEVO.-OVICV. 12.5) City of Moorpark Slope Planting at Single-Family Fi 12.3 Q5 g. Planning Division Residence (Plan View) 000176 I Resolution No. 2004 - Page 73 N.T.S. Sj.O?Pff ,PLAN'r1NO A7 MULTIPLE-FAMILY RP-51PENCZ OPLAN (FIC►. 12.4) `�,: City of Moorpark Slope Planting at Multi-Family Fig. 12.4 Planning Division Residence (Plan View) 000177 i I