HomeMy WebLinkAboutAGENDA REPORT 2004 1201 CC REG ITEM 08BMOORPARK CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA REPORT
ITEM 3. 1�
CITY OF MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA
City Council Meeting
of 1,2- / _ d q
ACTION:
TO: Honorable City Council
FROM: Kim C. Chudoba, Senior Management Analyst
DATE: November 17, 2004 (CC Meeting of 12/1/04)
SUBJECT: Consider Use of Supplemental Law Enforcement Services
Grant Funds for 2004/05 Fiscal Year
BACKGROUND
Every year since 1996, the State of California has provided
Supplemental Law Enforcement Services (SLES) Grants to cities
and counties. These funds must be used for front -line law
enforcement as determined by the City Council during a public
hearing held each year.
In the past, the City received and used these funds as follows:
1996/97
$64,578
Motorcycle, computer upgrades,
video cameras, miscellaneous
1997/98
$65,320
Administrative assistant position,
vehicle expenses, video surveillance
camera, night vision binoculars,
portable generator, FAX broadcast
system, computer upgrades
1998/99
$50,334
Administrative assistant position
1999/00
$65,730
Administrative assistant position,
laptop computer
2000/01
$100,000
Administrative assistant position,
two vehicles (detective bureau and
high school resource officer)
2001/02
$100,000
Administrative assistant position,
500 40 -hour patrol officer position,
mini -van maintenance
2002/03
$100,000
8% Administrative assistant position,
(plus $17,508
in unspent
90% 40 -hour patrol officer position
funds & interest earnings)
2003/04
$100,000
600 40 -hour patrol officer position
u 11101-9
Honorable City Council
December 1, 2004 Regular Meeting
Page 2
DISCUSSION
The 2004/05 State Budget allocates a minimum
funds to each jurisdiction. Therefore, the
includes $100,000 in expenditures from SLES
patrol officer. This position was added in
front -line law enforcement. For 2004/05, the
officer is expected to be $175,581.
of $100,000 in SLES
2004/05 City Budget
money for a 40 -hour
2001/02 to enhance
cost of this patrol
The 2004/05 City Budget funds this patrol officer with $100,000
of SLES money and $75,581 of general funds. Staff recommends
that the City Council approve this expenditure plan. A budget
amendment is not required since general funds budgeted for
police services will be sufficient to absorb this cost.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
1. Conduct public hearing; and
2. Approve expenditure plan.
''fi r�iP.0"10