Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAGENDA REPORT 2005 0216 CC REG ITEM 10CTO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: BACKGROUND CITY OF MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA City Council Meeting of o? - /le o�40s ACTION:�T,��/ MOORPARK CITY COUN AGENDA REPORT BY: The Honorable City Council Kenneth C. Gilbert Director of Public Works February 8, 2005 (Council Meeting 2- 16 -05) Consider Installation of Bike Lanes on the Collins Drive Bridge 1. In December of 2004, the City Council discussed this matter and asked that certain additional information be developed by staff prior to the City Council's reconsideration of the matter at a future City Council meeting. 2. Subsequently, a traffic engineering consultant retained by the City completed its report on the function of the Collins Drive / Campus Park Drive intersection. A summary discussion of the findings and recommendations in that report is discussed herein. 3. This matter was discussed by the Transportation and Streets Committee [Mayor Pro Tem Harper and Councilmember Millhouse] on February 7, 2005. DISCUSSION A. Circulation Element The Circulation Element of the Moorpark General Plan shows the Class 2 Bike Lanes on Collins Drive extending south of Campus Park Drive, to the southerly terminus of Collins Drive. B. Conceptual Striping Design Staff retained the services of a traffic engineer to prepare a conceptual striping plan for Collins Drive south of Campus Park Drive (see Exhibit 1) . This plan shows how the striping on the bridge could be revised to provide "striped" Bike Lanes. CollinsBridge 0412 00014 t Collins Bridge Restriping February 16, 2005 Page 2 C. One Southbound Lane It should be noted that, due to the limited width of the bridge, it was necessary to revise the striping for southbound vehicular traffic to provide only one southbound lane, plus a lane for the westbound freeway on -ramp. D. Width Dimensions of the Collins Drive Bridge The diagram attached as Exhibit 2 shows three (3) options for land striping on the Collins Drive bridge, briefly described as follows: Option A: the existing striping lay -out; Option B: a plan showing Bike Lanes and four (4) lanes of through traffic (this option requires widening the bridge); and; Option C: the proposed restriping plan (this plan show one sixteen feet (16') wide southbound lane). E. Capacity Study A Consultant was retained by the City to prepare a traffic study for the Collins Drive / Campus Park Drive intersection to determine traffic impacts of implementing the subject restriping project. A copy of that study has been distributed to the City Council under separate cover. The intersection capacity studying prepared by the Consultant found that the restriping of the bridge, as discussed herein, is feasible and that traffic impacts are minor. F. Caltrans Approval If the City Council directs staff to proceed with the implementation of this plan, it will be necessary for staff to first seek and obtain a permit from Caltrans. G. Committee Review This matter was reviewed by the Transportation and Streets Committee [Mayor Pro Tem Harper and Councilmember Millhouse] on February 7, 2005. The Committee recommended that consideration of the possible implementation of this striping change, be deferred until after proposed shopping center (M &M Development) and related street improvements are constructed. RECOI&MNDATION Staff and the Transportation and Streets Committee recommend that no action be taken on this proposal. Attachments: Exhibit l: Restriping Plan Exhibit 2: Bridge Cross - Sections: Striping Options Ccllinsbridge2 0502 00014'7 SCALE: REVISIONS CAW RIE i KB I RAMP \ ) 2 C \ \ \\ \� COL L I NS DRIVE RTE Ills N8 OFF RAMP 4 \ �\ R� I10� .................. O \ --Z \\ _ REFERENCES 1 LECEND Qone enrn lane OWR on -ramp ORik. Lane OEnd of Rik, Lane J 4 SIGNING AND STRIPING PLAN CONCEPT 2 O Collins Drivc IT Campus Park Urivc &Los AngNel Avenuc CITY OF NI( )RP Exhibit 2: Bridge Cross - Sections Striping Options Collins Drive Bridge Striping Concepts (Looking South) A. Existing Striping I<--------------------------------------------------- 66'------------------------------------------------- - - - - -> 1 median _ (left -turn lane) _ 1 14' 1 12' 1 10' 1 12' 1 16' 1 B. Striping Plan with Four Lanes and Bike Lanes I<------------------------------------------------------------ 70'---------------------------------------------------- - - - - -> 1 median _ (left -turn lane) _ I 5' 1 12' 1 12' 1 12' 1 12' 1 12' 1 5' 1 Bike Bike [Note: If Caltrans requires the Bike lane to be measured from the lip of a two feet (2') wide gutter, the Bike Lanes would have to be 7' wide increasing the curb -to -curb width to 74'.) C. Proposed Plan l< ------------------------------------------------------------ 66 ---------- median _ (left -turn lane) 1 7' 1 12' 1 12' 1 12' Bike 1 16' 1 7' 1 Bike 000149 TO: FROM: DATE ITEM 10-C - M E M O R A N D U M The Honorable City Council Kenneth C. Gilbert, Director of Public Works February 11, 2005 /--0- SUBJECT: Supplemental Report Pertaining to: Installation of Bike Lanes on the Collins Drive Bridge The attached study is related to Item No. D.C. on the Agenda for the February 16, 2005, City Council meeting. C. HARTZOG CRABILL, Inc. Trammell Hartzog, President Jerry Crabill, P.E., Executive Vice President 275 Centennial Way Suite 208 Tustin, CA 92780 Phone: (714) 731 -9455 FAX: (714) 731 -9498 www.hartzog-crabill.com January 3, 2005 Mr. Ken Gilbert Public Works Director City of Moorpark 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark, California 93021 Subject: Focused Capacity Analysis on Collins Drive between Campus Park Drive and Los Angeles Avenue in the City of Moorpark Dear Mr. Gilbert: Hartzog & Crabill, Inc. (HCI) has completed a focused traffic capacity analysis in order to provide recommendations regarding the consideration for re- striping Collins Drive to include bike lanes. More specifically, the analysis should show if the proposed bike lane installation on both sides of Collins Drive, with corresponding lane re- configuration for one continuous southbound lane, will improve conditions for bicyclists and not significantly impact existing vehicular traffic. This study is intended to complement the attached "concept" signing and striping plan prepared for Collins Drive, between Los Angeles Avenue and Campus Park Drive. Our analysis showed that the possibility for re- striping Collins Drive, between Campus Park Drive and Los Angeles Avenue, to include bike lanes on each side and one southbound through -lane is feasible without significant traffic impacts. If bike lanes are approved on both sides of Collins, our recommendation is to re- stripe and re -sign Collins Drive per the finalized signing and striping plan. In order to minimize the possibility for traffic backup on Collins Drive, timing parameters should be verified and adjusted at the Campus Park Drive signal to ensure more efficient traffic flow. Thank you again for the opportunity to work with you on this striping project and capacity analysis. We look forward to working with the City of Moorpark on any future projects. If you have any questions or need more information please call. Very truly yours, HARTZOG & CRABILL, INC. r l Trammell Hartzog President Consulting Traffic Engineers to Government Agencies FOCUSED TRAFFIC CAPACITY ANALYSIS ON COLLINS DRIVE BETWEEN CAMPUS PARK DRIVE AND LOS ANGELES AVENUE IN THE CITY OF MOORPARK EXISTING CONDITIONS Collins Drive, from Campus Park Drive to Los Angeles Avenue, is a 62 -foot wide north -south arterial roadway. This 4 -lane roadway provides for two lanes of traffic in each direction separated by an 11 -foot wide solid - double - yellow painted center median. The east side of Collins Drive is improved with curb, gutter, and sidewalk, while the west side has only curb and gutter. Collins Drive has a posted speed limit of 35 MPH and there are NO STOPPING ANY TIME signs restricting any street parking on both sides of the roadway for the entire segment. (see Exhibit 1 below) This segment of Collins Drive serves as a connector to the SR -118 Freeway on/off- ramps. Traffic control in this segment of Collins Drive consists of a 7 -phase traffic signal at the northerly intersection with Campus Park Drive and a 2 -phase signal at the SR -118 West on /off - ramps; along with a 3 -way stop sign installation at Los Angeles Avenue. Moorpark College is located at the northeast corner of the intersection of Collins Drive and Campus Park Drive. The traffic data gathered for this study was obtained when this adjacent college was in session and typical traffic conditions were expected. Exhibit 1 (Collins Drive looking north towards Campus Park Drive) Hartzog & Crabill, Inc. Consulting Traffic Engineers Page 1 of 7 Focused Traffic Capacity Analysis on Collins Drive in the City of Moorpark SCOPE OF WORK Data Collection Our first task was to gather pertinent traffic count data on Collins Drive between Campus Park Drive and Los Angeles Avenue. Average Daily Traffic (ADT) count data was recorded for three days from Monday through Wednesday, November 15, 16, and 17, 2004. Three (3) machine counters were placed on Collins Drive at the following locations in order to collect southbound traffic data: 1) at the entrance to the State Route 118 (SR -118) Westbound On -Ramp; 2) south of the SR -118 WB On- Ramps; and 3) at the SB right -turn lane leading into the SR -118 EB On- Ramp. Table 1 below shows the results for the southbound ADT at each of these locations. Tuesday, November 16, 2004 proved to be the mid -week day with the highest traffic volumes. TABLE 1 Table 2 (next page) shows the results for the highest peak -hour traffic volumes at each of these four locations. Hartzog & Crabill, Inc. Consulting Traffic Engineers Page 2 of 7 ADT ADT ADT ADT COUNT LOCATION MONDAY TUESDAY WEDNESDAY 11/15/04 11/16/04 11/17/04 1) SB Entrance to SR -118 WB On- Ramp 7,919 8,429 8,446 2) SB Collins N/o SR -118 WB Off - Ramp 5,828 6,013 5,824 3) SB Collins S/o SR -118 WB On /Off -Ramps 10,344 10,856 10,441 4) SB Collins Right -Turn Lane Into SR -118 EB On -Ramp 9,292 9,800 9,260 Table 2 (next page) shows the results for the highest peak -hour traffic volumes at each of these four locations. Hartzog & Crabill, Inc. Consulting Traffic Engineers Page 2 of 7 Focused Traffic Capacity Analysis on Collins Drive in the City of Moorpark Data Collection (continued) TARTY, 2 From the ADT count data, a 4 -hour peak period occurring between 11:00am to 3:00pm was determined as having the highest daily traffic volumes. Intersection turning movement counts were then taken at the Collins Drive and Campus Park Drive signal during these four hours on Tuesday, December 1, 2004. The highest peak hour from this intersection count occurred between 1 I :00am to 12:00pm. (All traffic count data is also attached) Signal Operations Analysis The next task consisted of evaluating existing signal operations at the larger intersection of Collins and Campus Park Drives utilizing the WEbster program, which is a faithful implementation of the 2000 Highway Capacity Manual (HCM 2000) procedures. The HCM 2000 bases intersection Level -of- Service (LOS) on the average amount of control delay per vehicle (in seconds per vehicle). WEbster determines LOS based on the HCM 2000 methodology described below: Hartzog & Crabill, Inc. Consulting Traffic Engineers Level of Service Veh. Delay (seconds) PEAK HOUR PEAK HOUR PEAK HOUR B ADT COUNT LOCATION MONDAY TUESDAY WEDNESDAY 20.1 to 35 D 11/15/04 11/16/04 11/17/04 (very long delay) SB Entrance to SR -118 WB On- F (extreme delay /jammed) Over 80 or V/C > 1.00 1) Ramp 824 918 783 2) SB Collins N/o SR -118 WB Off- Ramp 631 605 496 3) SB Collins S/o SR -118 WB On /Off -Ramps 1,033 998 872 4) SB Collins Right -Turn Lane Into SR -118 EB On -Ramp 939 910 790 From the ADT count data, a 4 -hour peak period occurring between 11:00am to 3:00pm was determined as having the highest daily traffic volumes. Intersection turning movement counts were then taken at the Collins Drive and Campus Park Drive signal during these four hours on Tuesday, December 1, 2004. The highest peak hour from this intersection count occurred between 1 I :00am to 12:00pm. (All traffic count data is also attached) Signal Operations Analysis The next task consisted of evaluating existing signal operations at the larger intersection of Collins and Campus Park Drives utilizing the WEbster program, which is a faithful implementation of the 2000 Highway Capacity Manual (HCM 2000) procedures. The HCM 2000 bases intersection Level -of- Service (LOS) on the average amount of control delay per vehicle (in seconds per vehicle). WEbster determines LOS based on the HCM 2000 methodology described below: Hartzog & Crabill, Inc. Consulting Traffic Engineers Level of Service Veh. Delay (seconds) A (minimal delay) 0 to 10 B (short delay) 10.1 to 20 C (average delay) 20.1 to 35 D (long delay) 35.1 to 55 E (very long delay) 55.1 to 80 F (extreme delay /jammed) Over 80 or V/C > 1.00 Page 3 of 7 Focused Traffic Capacity Analysis on Collins Drive in the City of Moorpark Signal Operations Analysis (continued) In order to properly analyze signal operations, some of the input data required in this program are the signal phasing sequence, approach lane configurations, hourly volumes, peak -hour factors, and minimum times to be satisfied, i.e., pedestrian times. The 11:OOAM peak -hour turning movement traffic volumes were used in the WEbster analysis with existing lane geometry and signal phasing (WEbster routine attached). The signalized intersection operations were found to be satisfactory during this highest peak -hour with a Whole Intersection delay of 19 seconds and a corresponding LOS B. The Critical Movements had a Weighted Average delay of 21 seconds, acceptable volume -to- capacity (V /C) ratios, and showed no signs of reaching saturation values at this time. The required minimum cycle length calculated during this peak period was 83 seconds. For this analysis, we will round up the peak cycle length to a more typical 90 seconds. Lane Capacity Analysis With the calculation of the minimum cycle length during the peak hour, our following task was to determine the amount of traffic that the southbound receiving lanes of Collins Drive actually carry during the highest peak hour. Since this is a 7 -phase traffic signal, we know that not all movements during this hour will ever be allowed onto the southbound lanes of Collins Drive at the same time. Approximately 40 signal cycles should occur within the peak hour (3600 seconds in one hour divided by our cycle length of 90 seconds). The highest amount of traffic allowed from this project intersection is then determined by the amount of "green" time per cycle that each signal movement assigns right -of -way onto the SB Collins Drive. The highest hourly movements, or phases, approaching onto the southbound receiving lanes of Collins Drive occur during the westbound left -turn movement and the southbound through -lane movement. The eastbound right -turn volumes must also be included during each of these phases. It should be noted again, that this focused study is analyzing the effects of the "concept" striping changes required to accommodate the two receiving lanes from the traffic signal onto southbound Collins Drive. Specifically, the "concept" striping reduces the existing two (2) through -lanes to one (1) continuous through -lane and one (1) channelized right -turn lane onto the WB freeway on -ramp, just south of the intersection of Collins and Campus Park Drives. Per the HCM 2000, the capacity, or saturation flow, of a through -lane is 1,900 vehicles per hour, and 1,800 for a left -turn or right -turn lane, before any progression factors are considered. As shown in the WEbster Routine Output, the westbound protected - permissive left -turn movement during the peak hour has an adjusted traffic volume of 582 vehicles. Accordingly, the V/C ratio for this westbound left -turn movement only is 0.32, acceptable for one lane of traffic. Furthermore, if 582 vehicles are divided by 40 cycles, the total vehicles allowed on this westbound left -turn movement is approximately 15 vehicles per cycle. Hartzog & Crabill, Inc. Consulting Traffic Engineers Page 4 of 7 Focused Traffic Capacity Anal sis on Collins Drive in the City of Moorpark Lane Capacity Analysis (continued) Additionally, if we divide the 81 eastbound right -turn vehicles (from the routine output) by 40 cycles, the total vehicles allowed during the eastbound right -turn movement is approximately 2 vehicles per cycle. Therefore, total vehicles average 17 vehicles per cycle during the peak westbound left -turn movement. We must also be reminded that this is a worst case, and these numbers represent adjusted hourly volumes that are normally split at this signal's southbound receiving lanes. Per the southbound ADT counts shown above, the major amount of immediate traffic (60 %) uses the right lane to access the WB freeway on -ramp. Thus, 40% continue southbound towards Los Angeles Avenue. We can also look at the traffic volumes even more practically, and estimate a conservative 40 seconds of "split" time per cycle for these particular peak hour movements (33 -38s movement times per the WEbster routine based on a 83s cycle). If we use a typical headway (i.e, time each vehicle takes to pass a limit line on a green signal) of 2 seconds per vehicle, then the maximum volume allowed during both these movements is 20 vehicles per cycle. Therefore, at any one time during the busiest peak hour, the highest volume that one southbound lane on Collins Drive will receive is 20 vehicles. Moreover, a typical vehicle length is 25 feet; and therefore a maximum queue length of 500 feet would be needed to store all these cars if the downstream 2 -phase traffic signal at the WB freeway on /off -ramps is red for southbound traffic. These vehicles can be stored since there is approximately 525 feet of lane length from one crosswalk line to the limit line of the other signal. This worst -case cycle assumes that all vehicles, which are approaching at separate times, are not even accessing the uncontrolled WB freeway on -ramp, but are continuing southbound onto the EB freeway on -ramp at Los Angeles Avenue. As mentioned, the ADT counts show this is not the case, with 60% of the southbound traffic immediately using the WB freeway on -ramp. The same conclusions are made for the southbound traffic volumes south of the WB freeway on/off - ramps. Since the signal operations do not allow the entire southbound volumes to occur at one time, the added volumes from the freeway off -ramp can be accommodated similarly to existing conditions, even with one (1) southbound lane. This is due to the fact that over 90% of this southbound traffic volume uses the right lane already to enter the right -turn lane into the EB freeway on -ramp at Los Angeles Avenue. Hartzog & Crabill, Inc. Consulting Traffic Engineers Page 5 of 7 Focused Traffic Capacity Analysis on Collins Drive in the City of Moorpark Signal Timing Adjustments The lane capacity analysis described above assumes that the traffic signal at Collins Drive and Campus Park Drive does not rest in green in any one direction (say the southbound direction), so as to continue allowing approach vehicles to pass if there are no "detector calls" on Campus Park Drive. This may cause a short backup of traffic on Collins Drive when there is a red signal for southbound traffic at the downstream 2 -phase WB freeway on /off -ramps signal. In order to ensure that this does not occur, timing adjustments may be needed at the traffic signal controller for the intersection of Collins Drive and Campus Park Drive. Preferably, these timing adjustments may be made with knowledge of the timing parameters set by Caltrans at the freeway signal, if their signal timing sheets are requested. Timing adjustments to the City's signal at Collins and Campus Park Drives will improve traffic operations and minimize any possibility of traffic backing up in both directions of Collins Drive. Our specific timing recommendations include verifying and /or adjusting the actuation parameters, such as minimum initial, vehicle extension or gap, added initial, gap reduction, maximum limits, and recalls, amongst other volume density controls. It is our understanding that the City desires to ensure northbound traffic on Collins Drive does not backup from the freeway and is given priority during expected peak periods. Adjustments to the signal timing sheets using recent traffic count data and fine- tuning in the field, typically make a noticeable difference in terms of moving traffic more efficiently. CONCLUSIONS ➢ Traffic counts showed that 60% of southbound traffic coming from the signal at Collins Drive and Campus Park Drive use the first WB SR -118 Freeway on -ramp, while approximately 40% continue south toward Los Angeles Avenue. ➢ Existing conditions south of the Caltrans signal have 2 southbound lanes of traffic that are currently required to merge in order to access the right -turn lane leading into the EB SR -118 Freeway on -ramp. ➢ Traffic counts also showed that over 90% of the southbound traffic, south of the WB SR- 118 Freeway on /off - ramps, use the EB SR -118 Freeway on -ramp at Los Angeles Avenue. ➢ Existing conditions for the signal operations at the intersection of Collins Drive and Campus Park Drive, showed that the intersection is running at a Level -of- Service B and there is no significant delay for any critical movement. Therefore, there are no mitigations required at this time to accommodate the "concept" striping plan. Hartzog & Crabill, Inc. Consulting Traffic Engineers Page 6 of 7 Focused Traffic Capacity Analysis on Collins Drive in the City of Moorpark CONCLUSIONS (continued) ➢ The lane capacity for one continuous through -lane will be adequate for existing traffic volumes and not significantly impact the level -of- service. Most southbound vehicles are entering the freeway on -ramps located on their right side and this "concept" plan should provide for a more linear and orderly traffic flow. Again, this is due to the fact that 60% are already using the immediate southbound #2 -lane to access the WB on -ramp, and 90% of the continuing southbound traffic volumes will not need to merge from the #1 -lane when accessing the EB on -ramp. Our analysis shows that the possibility for re- striping the southbound lanes of Collins Drive, between Campus Park Drive and Los Angeles Avenue, to include bike lanes on each side and re- stripe for one southbound through -lane is feasible without significant impacts. The "concept" striping plan shows the layout for the proposed bike lane installation and should meet current State standards. If bike lanes are approved on both sides of Collins, then our recommendation to the City of Moorpark is to re- stripe and re -sign Collins Drive per the finalized signing and striping plan. RECOMMENDATIONS In order to minimize any possibility for traffic backup on Collins Drive, timing parameters should be verified and adjustments made to ensure more efficient traffic flow, with or without re- striping. HCI will be available to complete any necessary timing adjustments upon the City's notice. Using current traffic data, these adjustments typically improve signal operations by making a noticeable difference in moving traffic more efficiently. Hartzog & Crabill, Inc. Consulting Traffic Engineers Page 7 of 7 SCALE: I' - 40• lngr!n. REVISIONS ADT COUNT LOCATIONS RTE 118 *9 ON RAMP us PARK GPMpA N R7E* 118 K9 OFF RAMP ADT COUNT LOCA77ONS suwum ll� A X05 PJ� REFERENCES LEGEND- PR--a sm— & 1-- r0 BE IMST4LE0. C' FNl Frc Appm,� SIGNING tilliv STRIPING luirulty marw 11-UN111,111-1 'I I -U — Sheet I of I Collins Drive B/T Campus Park Drive & Los Angeles Avenue CITY OF MOORPARK C O L L I NS D RI V E .......... N, ........ . ... . ...... ..... . . ........ ..... .. . ... ... . ..... R N R7E* 118 K9 OFF RAMP ADT COUNT LOCA77ONS suwum ll� A X05 PJ� REFERENCES LEGEND- PR--a sm— & 1-- r0 BE IMST4LE0. C' FNl Frc Appm,� SIGNING tilliv STRIPING luirulty marw 11-UN111,111-1 'I I -U — Sheet I of I Collins Drive B/T Campus Park Drive & Los Angeles Avenue CITY OF MOORPARK ll� A X05 PJ� REFERENCES LEGEND- PR--a sm— & 1-- r0 BE IMST4LE0. C' FNl Frc Appm,� SIGNING tilliv STRIPING luirulty marw 11-UN111,111-1 'I I -U — Sheet I of I Collins Drive B/T Campus Park Drive & Los Angeles Avenue CITY OF MOORPARK STRATEGIC CONSULTANTS - ADT WORKSHEET CLIENT: HARTZOG & CRABILL PROJECT: CITY OF MOORPARK LOCATION: SR -118 WB ON RAMP / COLLINS DRIVE DATE: MONDAY, NOVEMBER 15, 2004 FILE NO: A -1 DIRECTION: ENTRANCE TIME 00 -15 15 -30 30 -45 45-60 HOUR TOTALS -00:00 0 8 6 5 19 01 :00' 5 4 4 0 13 - -02:00 1 0 0 0 1 03:Q0 "' 1 1 0 0 2 -04:00 ` 1 4 4 10 19 05:00 ` 9 10 14 15 48 06:00- 21 371 49 85 192 0 -00` 124 78 83 100 385 08:00' 121 146 90 63 420 09:00 67 70 101 249 487 10:00:' 96 86 74 85 341 1,j:00 204 261 208 151 824 12:00 197 1061 105 215 623 13:00: 174 114 164 195 647 14:00 , 170 238 174 133 715 ;15:00 ! 184 133 106 142 565 18:OQ', 148 105 121 78 452 17:00' 83 110 174 122 489 1$;QO 98 851 81 97 361 49:40; 76 57 56 76 265 51 108 84 80 323 21:00 172 157 140 96 565 X2;00; 59 61 22 ill 153 23t00 1 2 3 4 10 TOTAL 7919 AM PEAKHOUK, 11:00 -12:00 VpLIlME 824 PIA" REAK HOUR " ` 13:45 -14:45 OLUME""; 777 TOTAL DIRECTIONAL VOLUME 7919 STRATEGIC CONSULTANTS - ADT WORKSHEET CLIENT: HARTZOG & CRABILL PROJECT: CITY OF MOORPARK LOCATION: SR -118 WB ON RAMP / COLLINS DRIVE DATE: TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 16, 2004 FILE NO: A -2 DIRECTION: ENTRANCE TIME 00 -15 15 -30 30-45 46-60 HOUR" TOTALS 00:00 " 7 0 0 5 12 01:00 2 4 1 2 9 ,02:00 1 1 0 11 3 03c00.' 0 2 2 0 4 04:00 1 1 2 5 9 05:00': 9 9 10 15 43 06:00 20 35 39 108 202 07 :00 115 90 75 1291 409 0$:00 100 127 91 67 385 013:00 53 66 114 248 481 10:00' 95 541 73 117 339 t1 :00 182 265 221 141 809 12:00 93 98 204 3081 703 13:00' 225 181 139 153 698 :.14:00 158 266 163 151 738 15:00 155 165 200 183 703 16:00; 96 139 127 146 508 17:00 "' 87 137 107 1031 434 'it 0 65 87 105 111 368 83 66 85 92 326 20:00' 95 108 127 162 492 21 ":00 138 170 174 148 630 = 22:00 65 26 18 7 116 %— 23:00 = 3 2 2 1 8 TOTAL 8429 AM" PEAK HOUR 11:00 -12:00 VOLUME; 809 PM, PEAK HOUR 12:30 -13:30 VOLUME 918 TOTAL DIRECTIONAL VOLUME 8429 STRATEGIC CONSULTANTS - ADT WORKSHEET CLIENT: HARTZOG & CRABILL PROJECT: CITY OF MOORPARK LOCATION: SR -118 WB ON RAMP / COLLINS DRIVE DATE: WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 17, 2004 FILE NO: A -3 DIRECTION: ENTRANCE TIME 00 -15 1'5 -30 30-45 45-60 HOUR TOTALS 00:00 6 2 3 3 14 01 :w 4 2 5 0 11 02:00 0 31 0 0 3 03 :00 3 ol 2 1 6 04:00' 1 2 1 2 6 05:00' 6 12 14 12 44 06:00 -` 25 42 58 88 213 07 :00 113 84 97 118 412 08:04 105 1121 97 113 427 09 :00' 89 64 87 195 435 10:00; 78 54 71 212 415 11 :00 147 144 140 283 714 12:00 178 85 174 263 700 13:00: 138 137 144 229 648 14 :00 157 244 153 184 738 15:00` 136 154 186 161 637 1 :Ft0 "� 124 129 107 103 463 17:00 83 130 160 126 499 18:00'' 103 88 163 120 474 19;OD 124 69 71 671 331 20 :00` 128 1201 202 150 600 140 171 133 93 537 22 :00 50 24 19 10 103 `-23 :00 9 2 4 1 16 TOTAL 8446 AM PEAK`.HOUR 11:15 12:15 VOLUME" 745 PM PEAK 'HOUR 13:45 -14:45 VOLUME 783 TOTAL DIRECTIONAL VOLUME 8446 STRATEGIC CONSULTANTS - ADT WORKSHEET CLIENT: HARTZOG & CRABILL PROJECT: CITY OF MOORPARK LOCATION: SB COLLINS DRIVE @ SR 118 WB RAMPS DATE: MONDAY, NOVEMBER 15, 2004 FILE NO: A -1 DIRECTION: SOUTHBOUND 'TIME 00.15 15 -30 '30-45 45-60 _ HOUR' TOTALS 00:00' 0 3 3 1 7 01:001' 3 3 0 0 6 02:00 `— 0 31 1 0 4 03:00 0 2 2 4 8 04:00 2 5 11 10 28 05:00 20 18 29 321 99 06:00; 27 50 43 51 171 07:00,` 55 58 74 86 273 0$100' 67 95 164 48 374 09 :00 49 52 100 164 365 65 45 50 79 239 _.61:00 142 229 144 116 631 12:00; 115 731 64 1731 425 "13;00. 111 74 122 120 427 14:00 101 138 113 126 478 105 90 82 114 391 16:00;: 104 89 87 70 350 17:00 53 69 110 70 302 100 731 57 85 84 299 19:00 s 65 47 55 68 235 20:00 59 77 57 68 261 21:00 120 101 85 451 351 22:00] 36 241 8 8 76 23:00 10 3 10 5 28 TOTAL 5828 AM PEAK HOUR 11:00 -12:00 VOLUME 631 PM PEAK HOUR " 14:15 -15:15 VOLUME'" 482 TOTAL DIRECTIONAL VOLUME 5828 STRATEGIC CONSULTANTS - ADT WORKSHEET CLIENT: HARTZOG & CRABILL PROJECT: CITY OF MOORPARK LOCATION: SB COLLINS DRIVE Q SR 118 WB RAMPS DATE: TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 16, 2004 FILE NO: A -2 DIRECTION: SOUTHBOUND TIME' 00 -15 15 -30 " " 36-45 4-68 , "HOUR` TOTALS 00:00 2 2 1 1 6 _"01:00 0 2 0 1 3 02:00 2 1 2 0 5 03:00 -- 2 6 0 6 14 04:00 61 6 13 8 33 45:00' 18 22 27 271 94 35 38 48 56 177 117.00 55 59 88 751 277 0$:00 61 891 52 58 260 "08:00 43 611 80 182 366 10:00 69 43 63 84 259 127 211 122 95 555 12 :00' 61 85 157 219 522 13:00 130 99 66 89 384 x"14:6' 98 1591 115 89 461 15 :00� 89 119 121 119 448 16.'00 88 94 98 103 383 17:00"; 69 84 59 821 294 18:00 67 71 73 891 300 19:00` 651 55 78 771 275 20:00 79 91 89 139 398 1 :00, 76 136 102 81 395 22,,00; 45 15 11 10 81 Z.00; 1 10 8 41 1 23 TOTAL 6013 AM PEAK HOUR 11:00 -12:00 VOLUME 555 PM PEAK HOUR 12:30 -13:30 VOLUME 605 TOTAL DIRECTIONAL VOLUME 6013 STRATEGIC CONSULTANTS - ADT WORKSHEET CLIENT: HARTZOG & CRABILL PROJECT: CITY OF MOORPARK LOCATION: SB COLLINS DRIVE @ SR 118 WB RAMPS DATE: WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 17, 2004 FILE NO: A -3 DIRECTION: SOUTHBOUND TEME 00 -15 1&30 30-45 45-60• " . HOUIR TOTALS 00:00 2 1 0 1 4 01:00 0 2 2 1 5 02:00 2 31 4 7 16 03t}0,` 0 1 2 2 5 04:00 2 3 11 13 29 05 :00' 19 27 22 26 94 96:00 26 47 59 41 173 07:00' 66 66 77 84 293 08:00: 46 80 86 93 305 09:00 67 46 55 164 332 1{} :00 - 61 47 68 1421 318 11:00 100 116 107 167 490 12:00_ 105 69 88 146 408 13 :00' 106 771 113 131 427 t4 :00 92 160 110 98 460 15:00:. 89 84 99 73 345 '16 :0.0 96 78 82 801 336 17:00° 61 103 93 98 355 73 66 99 87 325 19:00 65 62 60 55 242 2d:0d : 61 94 103 99 357 2t :00, 112 125 103 491 389 22:00: 39 28 11 11 89 23:00 10 71 2 8 27 TOTAL 1 5824 AM "PEAK HOUR 11:15 -12:15 VOLUME 495 OM, PIE AKHQUR 13:30 -14:30 VOLUME 496 TOTAL DIRECTIONAL VOLUME 5824 STRATEGIC CONSULTANTS - ADT WORKSHEET CLIENT: HARTZOG & CRABILL PROJECT: CITY OF MOORPARK LOCATION: SB COLLINS DRIVE BTWN SR -118 WB & SR 118 EB RAMPS DATE: MONDAY, NOVEMBER 15, 2004 FILE NO: A -1 DIRECTION: SOUTHBOUND TIME 00 -15 15-30 30 45.16 45-60 ... HOUR TOTALS 00:00 1 5 6 3 15 01 :00' 4 9 1 6 20 02 :00';` 0 4 4 0 8 03:00' 0 4 4 9 17 04 00 ol 9 22 18 49 05:00.' 36 41 52 58 187 06 :001' 65 88 86 102 341 07:00. 106 110 139 172 527 0:00' 139 154 145 87 525 09:QO' 84 116 129 275 604 �10 :00 ; 153 77 98 128 456 11 :00' 216 344 263 210 1033 12 :06 ! 128 159 119 249 655 11W 221 1281 216 194 759 14:00 196 226 209 203 834 15:00! 199 168 150 189 706 16;00 181 141 162 124 608 118 115 194 129 556 14:00 133 105 146 1781 562 I9:00; 140 88 96 135 459 20,00; 126 1441 108 123 501 21:00' 233 199 159 109 700 2260 64 56 17 20 157 23:40'- 21 8 23 13 65 TOTAL 10344 AM PEAK HOUR 11:00 -12:00 \/Ol UME 1033 PM PEAK`HOUR', 14:15 -15:15 VOLUME "° 837 TOTAL DIRECTIONAL VOLUME 10344 STRATEGIC CONSULTANTS - ADT WORKSHEET CLIENT: HARTZOG & CRABILL PROJECT: CITY OF MOORPARK LOCATION: SB COLLINS DRIVE BTWN SR -118 WB & SR 118 EB RAMPS DATE: TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 16, 2004 FILE NO: A -2 DIRECTION: SOUTHBOUND TIME 00-15 15 -30 30-45 45 -60:, 'HOUR. TOTALS 00:00 4 6 3 01 13 01:00: 2 4 0 2 8 02:00 1 2 4 0 7 03 :00' 6 8 5 13 32 04:00 8 12 27 23 70 05:001 29 45 55 52 181 06:00 61 86 91 108 346 07:00: 109 1241 154 156 543 08:00' 125 164 113 101 503 1 09:00 78 117 142 276 613 _10:00' 159 81 107 140 487 11 :00: 219 322 225 169 935 12:00 1171 139 217 359 832 13:00 265 157 140 157 719 14:00 164 273 196 178 811 15 :00:° 157 192 196 2171 762 1&00: 156 1351 186 163 640 17:00'- 133 123 106 133 495 18:00: 144 123 149 154 570 19 :00 127 111 142 151 531 '20,00, 150 165 176 263 754 21:00 1681 241 199 186 794 22:00.' 95 361 16 15 162 23:Q0 21 14 13 0 48 TOTAL 10856 AM PEAKHOUR 11:00 -12:00 V,QLQIgE ,'. 935 PM PEAK !-TOUR .' 12:30 -13:30 VOLUME 998 TOTAL DIRECTIONAL VOLUME 10856 STRATEGIC CONSULTANTS - ADT WORKSHEET CLIENT: HARTZOG & CRABILL PROJECT: CITY OF MOORPARK LOCATION: SB COLLINS DRIVE BTWN SR -118 WB & SR 118 EB RAMPS DATE: WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 17, 2004 FILE NO: A -3 DIRECTION: SOUTHBOUND TIME,` �- , 00 -15 15 -30 30-45 ' 45 6D � HOUR TOTALS 00:00 4 3 1 ol _8 01:00':` 1 3 5 1 10 02M 3 61 8 11 28 03 :00 1 2 2 6 11 04 :00; 4 5 17 26 52 05:00 36 56 411 59 192 06:Odi 1 49 89 116 84 338 07:00 117 126 144 149 536 08:00 106 141 167 169 583 09:06'' 135 1001 88 2751 598 t0:f}0 122 90 108 223 543 11:00' 197 192 205 254 848 12:00: 221 133 135 255 744 13 :00 215 163 169 236 783 14 :00 160 2651 198 161 784 15:001 169 157 163 121 610 16:00' 141 124 151 114 530 17:00' 93 162 155 125 535 18:00" 171 108 188 153 620 19;60 1301 126 1181 110 484 20:00 129 164 219 196 708 21 :00' 167 208 174 102 651 22 :00 82 52 26 28 188 213:00 20 121 4 21 57 TOTAL 10441 AM PEAK HOUR 11:15 -12:15 VOLUME. 872 PM PEAK HOUR 13:45 -14:45 VOLUME 859 TOTAL DIRECTIONAL VOLUME 10441 STRATEGIC CONSULTANTS- ADT WORKSHEET CLIENT: HARTZOG & CRABILL PROJECT: CITY OF MOORPARK LOCATION: SR 118 EB ON RAMP / COLLINS DRIVE DATE: MONDAY, NOVEMBER 15, 2004 FILE NO: A -1 DIRECTION: ENTRANCE TIME 00 -15 1 530 30.45 45-60 ' HOUR` TOTALS 00:00 0 5 6 3 14 01:00 4 8 0 6 18 42 00 0 41 4 ol 8 03:00 i 0 4 4 9 17 04:00 0 8 21 18 47 05:00 35 39 49 56 179 06:00 1 64 83 80 97 324 07:00 94 104 122 1571 477 ;08:001 134 135 131 76 476 OS :00 77 108 120 242 547 140 70 91 117 418 11 ":00 200 317 230 1921 939 12:00' 109 141 93 233 576 13:00'' 207 104 203 171 685 14:00: 176 207 175 177 735 15:00 176 146 128 161 611 16.00' 148 1121 141 1011 502 1 ?:00 92 90 160 113 455 - "t8 :00` 104 95 135 162 496 10:00. 132 83 89 130 434 20:00. 125 135 102 114 476 21:0E1` 221 187 151 105 664 22:00:: 581 53 14 18 143 23 :00` 14 6 18 13 51 TOTAL 9292 AM PEAK HOUR l 11:00 -12:00 VOLUME 939 PM PEAK HOUR ! 13:30 -14:30 VOLUME 757 TOTAL DIRECTIONAL VOLUME 9292 STRATEGIC CONSULTANTS- ADT WORKSHEET CLIENT: HARTZOG & CRABILL PROJECT: CITY OF MOORPARK LOCATION: SR 118 EB ON RAMP / COLLINS DRIVE DATE: TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 16, 2004 FILE NO: A -2 DIRECTION: ENTRANCE TIME 00 -15 15-30 "' x30-45 45-60 ' HOUR TOTALS 00:00 4 5 3 0 12 01:00; 2 4 0 2 8 02:oU 0 1 4 0 5 03:00 5 7 4 13 29 04;00 8 11 27 221 68 moo 29 43 54 47 173 06:00 59 83 88 104 334 07;00': 104 117 141 139 501 08 :00'" 120 155 102 93 470 09:00 71 109 130 2511 561 10:00; 149 75 99 134 457 11:00' 205 296 206 152 859 12:00 " 105 132 200 325 762 13;00` 242 143 131 146 662 14:00' 147 252 171 160 730 15x00` 138 1601 171 163 632 woo; 123 99 142 123 487 17:00; 92 91 77 113 373 16:00` 126 113 135 1381 512 19:00 :" 120 105 131 146 502 20:00- 139 153 172 253 717 21;00 156 2321 194 178 760 90 34 14 9 147 18 121 9 0 39 TOTAL 9800 AM WEAK HOUR 11:00-12:00 VOLUME 859 PM PEAK HOUR 12:30 -13:30 1fOWME -' 910 TOTAL DIRECTIONAL VOLUME 9800 STRATEGIC CONSULTANTS- ADT WORKSHEET CLIENT: HARTZOG & CRABILL PROJECT: CITY OF MOORPARK LOCATION: SR 118 EB ON RAMP / COLLINS DRIVE DATE: WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 17, 2004 FILE NO: A -3 DIRECTION: ENTRANCE TIME 0045 '15 -30 30-45 "45-60 'HOUR' TOTALS 00:00 4 3 0 0 7 01 :00 0 2 2 0 4 02:00 ! 3 4 81 8 23 03:00 , 0 2 2 6 10 04.001 3 5 16 25 49 - 05:00 34 52 40 55 181 06:00` 461 87 109 73 315 07:00, 105 123 128 135 491 08 ;00 96 124 1521 155 527 09 :00 124 86 79 260 549 '10:00 1 108 86 99 206 499 11:00 187 173 182 234 776 12 :00 201 123 122 237 683 :13:00 205 148 145 214 712 14:00 150 2421 177 139 708 15:OU 151 137 135 85 508 � Woo,: 107 81 104 75 367 17:00 i 55 128 94 85 362 '`18:00': 141 91 1711 136 539 19:00' 116 118 113 99 446 20:00, 121 154 206 189 670 21:00 154 197 166 95 612 -22:00 781 461 21 25 170 23:00 ` 18 11 3 20 52 TOTAL 9260 AM PEAK HOUR 11:15 -12:15 VOLUME. 790 PM PEAK HOUR 13:45 -14:45 VOLUME 783 TOTAL DIRECTIONAL VOLUME 9260 Location: COLLINS DRIVE/ CAMPUS PARK DRIVE TURNING MOVEMENT COUNTS Date: TUESDAY, DECEMBER 01, 2004 SOUTHBOUND TIME PERIOD 11:00AM 11:15AM 11:15AM 11:30 AM 11:30 AM 11:45 AM 11:45 AM 12:00 PM 12:00 PM 12:15 PM 12:15 PM 12:30 PM 12:30 PM 12:45 PM 12:45 PM 1:00 PM 1:00 PM 1:15 PM 1:15 PM 1:30 PM 1:30 PM 1:45 PM 1:45 PM 2:00 PM 2:00 PM 2:15 PM 2:15 PM 2:30 PM 2:30 PM 2:45 PM 2:45 PM 3:00 PM 149 116 119 154 121 88 134 148 152 94 117 140 169 224 173 163 WESTBOUND Left Thru Right 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 WESTBOUND i 0 0 0 0 NORTHBOUND EASTBOUND Left Thru Right 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PEAK HOUR FACTOR= EASTBOUND 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 #DIV/0! 93 104 156 177 118 82 93 157 133 103 82 108 114 168 138 109.. 10 ' 11`,'^,10D= SOUTHBOUND TIME PERIOD Left Thru Right 7:OOAM 7:15AM 0 7:15 AM 7:30 AM 0 7:30 AM 7:45 AM 0 7:45 AM 8:00 AM 0 8:00 AM 8:15 AM 0 8:15AM 8:30 AM 0 8:30 AM 8:45 AM O 8:45 AM 9:00 AM 0 TOTAL= -12,.• 0 0 0 0 PERCENT- .8 �" •• •• •• Peak Period- 0 0 0 0 7:00 AM 8:OD AM •• •• •• SOUTHBOUND TIME PERIOD 11:00AM 11:15AM 11:15AM 11:30 AM 11:30 AM 11:45 AM 11:45 AM 12:00 PM 12:00 PM 12:15 PM 12:15 PM 12:30 PM 12:30 PM 12:45 PM 12:45 PM 1:00 PM 1:00 PM 1:15 PM 1:15 PM 1:30 PM 1:30 PM 1:45 PM 1:45 PM 2:00 PM 2:00 PM 2:15 PM 2:15 PM 2:30 PM 2:30 PM 2:45 PM 2:45 PM 3:00 PM 149 116 119 154 121 88 134 148 152 94 117 140 169 224 173 163 WESTBOUND Left Thru Right 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 WESTBOUND i 0 0 0 0 NORTHBOUND EASTBOUND Left Thru Right 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PEAK HOUR FACTOR= EASTBOUND 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 #DIV/0! 93 104 156 177 118 82 93 157 133 103 82 108 114 168 138 109.. 10 ' 11`,'^,10D= ;.84 ` F. 06, °_ .- 75: ;- 189 186 182 266 165 162 272 296 170 112 147 142 139 163 97 86 12 .. & . 23. 41 472 33 438 28 485 41 638 35 439 39 371 30 529 40 640 36 491 24 333 38 384 34 424 48 470 35 590 37 445 31 389 13,.:x7. ' 13 % %11' ,8i� 90, `' 10'r- #$ .. ' t0 "; 7$ 194= ".118< 15 - 7- "1$ -' 78', $, "-' 20-.- -12,.• ' 74�-, .,76 e .8 �" -11 2A.. & - ;a1Q --12t- <;iI'. '.Y47 " 141"1 10: Version 2.0.9 WEBSTER WEbster Based Signal Timing Evaluation Routine For Capacity and Level of Service Analysis Using HCM 2000 Control Delay Existing Traffic with Existing Lane Geometrics Collins Dr & Campus Park Dr City of Moorpark Inout Movement Times Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R 'L' T R L 'T R 'L' T R Movement 1: 0 secs X X X 3500 Sat Flow (1 Thru lane, vphg) 1900 Sat Flow (1 Right lane, vphg) Movement 2: 33 secs X X X X X X Movement 3: 10 secs X X Movement 4: 2 secs X X X Movement 5: 38 secs X X X X Movement 6: 0 secs # of Lanes # S P 1 2 1 P 2 1 1 1 2 1 2 1 Unadjusted Volume 50 28 65 466 47 17 45 409 369 8 1 503 30 Peak Hour Factor PHF 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.801 0.80 0.80 Growth Factor N Project Tri p Volume v h Sat. Flow Override v h PIP _ Min. Time or Ped. Time 10 36 36 8 33 33 10 10 10 10 37 37 Permissive Veh/C cle 2 Progression Ad . Factor (PAF) 1.00 1.00 1.00 PIP 1.00 1 1.00 1.00 1.00 1 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 01 -04 -2005 MD Peak Hour Duration of Peak Period (min) 15 Lost Time (sec) 2 Min. Time (Left Turns, sec) 10 Min/Ped Time (Thru Lanes, sec) 20 Sat Flow (1 Left lane, vphg) 1800 Sat Flow (2 Left lanes, vphg) 3500 Sat Flow (1 Thru lane, vphg) 1900 Sat Flow (1 Right lane, vphg) 1800 Vehicle Length (feet) 20 Summa Whole Intersection Weighted Avg Delay (sec) = 19 Level of Service - LOS = B Critical Movements Weighted Avg Delay (sec) = 21 Level of Service - LOS = C+ Intersection Capacity Utilization - ICU = 0.57 Required Cycle Length is 83 sec MInJPed. Times May Not Be Satisfied Filename: Collins- Campus Webster Analysi, Scenario 1 Collins Dr & Campus Park Dr, MD Peak Hour