Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAGENDA REPORT 2005 0316 CC REG ITEM 08ANOTICE OF CONTINUANCE OF PUBLIC HEARING A duly noticed public hearing regarding: Consider General Plan Amendment No. 2001 -05, Specific Plan No. 2001 -01, and Zone Change No. 2001 -02 for 1,650 Housing Units on 3,586.3 Acres Located Generally North of Moorpark College and State Route 118 on Land Immediately Outside City of Moorpark Municipal Boundaries, on the Application of North Park Village LP. was held on March 16, 2005, at which time the City Council continued the open public hearing to the City Council meeting to be held on April 20, 2005, at 7:00 p.m., in the Community Center located at 799 Moorpark Avenue, Moorpark, California. Dated: March 17, 2005. Maureen Benson, Deputy City Clerk STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF VENTURA ) ss CITY OF MOORPARK ) AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING I, Maureen Benson, declare as follows: That I am the Deputy City Clerk of the City of Moorpark and that a Notice of Continuance of Open Public Hearing regarding: Consider General Plan Amendment No. 2001 -05, Specific Plan No. 2001 -01, and Zone Change No. 2001 -02 for 1,650 Housing Units on 3,586.3 Acres Located Generally North of Moorpark College and State Route 118 on Land Immediately Outside City of Moorpark Municipal Boundaries, on the Application of North Park Villaae LP. continued from March 16, 2005, to April 20, 2005, was posted on March 17, 2005, at a conspicuous location near the place of the meeting: Moorpark Community Center 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark, California I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on March 17, 2005. Maureen Benson Deputy City Clerk ITEM 8 • A • CITY OF MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA City Council Meeting of MOORPARK CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT TO: Honorable City Council FROM: Barry K. Hogan, Community Development Directo �? Prepared By: David A. Bobardt, Planning Mana a DATE: March 3, 2005 (CC Meeting of 3/16/2005) SUBJECT: Consider General Plan Amendment No. 2001 -05, Specific Plan No. 2001 -01, and Zone Change No. 2001 -02, for 1,650 Housing Units on 3,586.3 Acres Located Generally North of Moorpark College and State Route 118 on Land Immediately Outside City of Moorpark Municipal Boundaries. Applicant: North Park Village, LP (APN: 500 -0- 120 -065; 500 -0 -170 -135; 500 -0- 180 -125, -135, - 145, -155, -165, -175, -185, -195, -205, -215, -225, - 235, -245, -255; 500 -0- 281 -165, -175; 500 -0- 292 -135, - 145, -195, -215, -225; 615 -0- 110 -205, -215; 615- 0 -150- 185) BACKGROUND On January 19, 2005, the City Council took additional testimony on the North Park project and discussed major project issues left to be resolved before the Council could even consider placing this project before the Moorpark voters. These issues include: • Construction Access; • Acquisition of Land for Freeway Access Road; • Number of Houses that May be Completed before Completion of Freeway Interchange; • Provision of Affordable Housing; • Filling Property Tax Allocation Gap to City; • Fire Protection District Plans to Build Fire Station; • Reaching Agreement on School Facilities with M.U.S.D.; • Plan Components that May Only be Changed by Voter Approval; • Reduction of Development Footprint for Wildlife Habitat and Movement Corridors; 000001 Honorable City Council March 16, 2005 Page 2 • Use and Location of Gates for Residential Planning Areas; and • Monitoring of Lake Management to Ensure Proper Maintenance in Perpetuity. DISCUSSION The Ad -Hoc Committee (Mayor Hunter and Mayor Pro Tem Harper) have been discussing these issues with the applicant as part of the negotiations on the proposed Development Agreement. The Ad- Hoc Committee is close to being able to make a recommendation on the Development Agreement. Once received by Council, the draft Development Agreement will be considered for referral to the Planning Commission for a recommendation. It is expected that a draft Development Agreement will be ready for City Council consideration by the April 20, 2005 meeting. One additional issue that arose at the January 19, 2005, City Council meeting was the adequacy of the monitoring in the draft Mitigation Monitoring Program, to ensure that all the Mitigation Measures identified in the Revised Draft Environmental Impact Report would be carried out and all performance standards would be met during project implementation. A revised draft Mitigation Monitoring Program, with changes to address these concerns, shown in underline /strikeout text, is attached. STAFF RECOMMENDATION 1. Continue to take testimony in the open public hearing. 2. Continue the agenda item with the hearing open to April 20, 2005. Attachment: Draft Mitigation Monitoring Program 000002 n n H H n Z H 0 C CJ North Park Specific Plan No. 2001 -01 Revised Draft Mitigation Monitoring Program TABLE 1 NORTH PARK SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 2001-01 MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM EIR Section /Mitigation Program Timing of Mitigation I Responsible Party(ies) Monitoring Action 3.1 Land Use and Related Planning Programs Project Design Features • A graded site and access road will be provided for the future P4or49- 4ssuance of Applicant, City Engineer Review of plans, site relocation of the Moorpark College Observatory to the North Park Nature Preserve. 501 -- building permit- 501St building permit will inspection not be issued until graded site and access road have been com.pleted,.to the satisfaction of the Cityis aEovfded. Standard Conditions and Requirements • Consistent with the City of Moorpark General Plan Housing Prior to first final map City of Moorpark and Execution of agreement Element, the tentative map shall be subject to execution of an approvalThe first final Applicant/Community Affordable Housing Agreement between the City of Moorpark and map will not be Development Director the applicant or developer. The Affordable Housing Agreement approved without an executed Affordable shall set forth the procedure for meeting an affordable housing requirement of 10 percent of the total number of approved dwelling Housing Agreement units. The Agreement may be part of a Development Agreement. Execution of the Affordable Housing Agreement is required prior to first final map approval. • Prior to approval of the first residential unit building permit, the Prior to issuance of first Applicant Receipt of fees. dedication of subdivider shall pay fees, edicate land. and /or make improvements residential unit building land and /or completion of improvements in accordance with Section 8297 -4 of the City's Subdivision permit Ordinance (Parks and Recreation Facilities). Mitigation Measures 1. The project applicant shall prepare a home buyer notification Package: Prior to Applicant, Community Review of notification package package that contains a description and accompanying maps recordation of the first Development Director by Community Development Director showing the adopted land use plans for the North Park Specific tract map Plan and surrounding areas, including the existence of grazing and agricultural activities and mineral rights (oil extraction) on and /or adjacent to the Specific Plan site. Each homeowner shall be required to affirm, by signature, that he /she is aware of the existing and future development plans onsite and in the surrounding area, and that he /she acknowledges the right of property owners to continue grazing and agricultural activities and mineral extraction operations to the extent allowed under applicable permits. The contents of the notification package shall be reviewed and approved by the Community Development Director prior to the recordation of the first tract map. CADocuments and Settings \DanaP \My Documents\North Park Village EIR \Draft MMP Table- 030305[1].docCADocuments and Settings \DanaP \My Documents \North Park Village EIR \Draft MMP Table- 030305(l] .doc 1 Mitigation c I� North Park Specific Plan No. 2001 -01 Revised Draft Mitigation Monitoring Program TABLE 1 (continued) NORTH PARK SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 2001 -01 MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM EIR Section /Mitigation Program Timing of Mitigation Responsible Party(ies) Monitoring Action The project applicant shall provide a 200 - foot -wide minimum width Setback: Prior to Applicant, Community Review of Tentative Tract Map setback from any residential structure adjacent to any onsite or approval of Tentative Development Director conditions offsite agricultural or grazing operations to reduce the effects of Tract Map impacts including spraying of pesticides over the adjacent agricultural operation, noise, dust, etc. This required setback shall be incorporated into the Specific Plan and shall be applicable until such time that onsite or offsite agricultural or grazing uses either cea- t or are converted or developed as a non- agrIgUltUralancit ter use. 2. All oil and gas wells, the injector well, and the tank farm facility Prior to issuance of Applicant, Community Review of plans, site within the boundaries of the Specific Plan site (not terminated grading permit Development Director inspection pursuant to State regulations) shall be enclosed by a six - foot -high masonry wall with secured gates to prohibit access to the extraction facilities by any persons other than authorized personnel, visually screen the facilities from adjacent uses, and mitigate noise. This requirement applies to facilities that would remain in operation after implementation of the Specific Plan project. The proposed walls, including elevations, building materials, landscape materials, and means of access to the facilities shall be submitted to the Community Development Director for review and approval prior to the issuance of a grading permit for any sensitive land use within 800 feet of these uses. 3. Prior to the recordation of the first final map, the project applicant Prior to recordation of Applicant, City of Moorpark, Approval of agreement shall provide the City of Moorpark Community Development first final map Ventura County Community Director with a written agreement between Ventura Community College District College District, the City of Moorpark, and the project applicant that an alternative future parking site acceptable to Moorpark College and the City of Moorpark has been identified to provide parking that would be precluded by implementation of the North Park Specific Plan project, as well as additional students generated by the project. 4. Implementation of the SR -118 interchange and access road would Prior to issuance of Applicant, City of Moorpark Completion of transfer of require either an easement over land owned by Waste grading permit for the property ManaoementUnocal or the acquisition of the property owned by first phase Df the prroiect Waste ManaaementUnesal. Should the project applicant be unable to directly purchase from Waste ManagementUnesal the right -of- way necessary to construct access road from the proposed Moorpark College SR -118 interchange to the North Park Specific Plan site, the City of Moorpark mayshall acquire. at the developer's exrWnse. including all City costs. all needed right -of -way at fair market value in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedures CADocuments and Settings \DanaP \My Documents \North Park Village EIR \Draft MMP Table- 030305[l] .docC1Documents and Settings \DanaP \My Documents\North Park Village EIR \Draft MMP Table -03030511j.doc 2 Mitigation North Park Specific Plan No. 2001-01 Revised Draft Mitigation Monitoring Program TABLE 1 (continued) NORTH PARK SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 2001-01 MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM EIR Section/Mitigation Program Timing of Mitigation Responsible Party(ies) Monitoring Action §§1230.010 regarding eminent domain..__Ngthing in this condition coLnpels thf� CLty _lq complete the eminent domain process if in the t __ _ sole and Unfettered lUdgment of the City condemnation of the rjccess right of way is not in the blic's interest. A decision by the 11 .. . ...... . ........... . ........... . . . ....... ___ . . . .............. PU Cif)Lj�ot to complete the eminent --- domain orocess shall not relieve — ---------- ----- — the applicant from the requirement to construct the interchange and connecting road and does not constitute a waiver of the offsite t.,ondition pursuant to California Code of Civil Procedures k §1230.010. 3.2 Aesthetics and Visual Resources Project Design Features • To the extent allowable by other agencies, all infrastructure shall be Prior to issuance of Applicant, Community Review of plans, site placed below grade to avoid visually prominent facilities. permits for infrastructure Development Director, inspection improvements Public Works Director, City Engineer • No new oil exploration or drilling would be permitted in development Prior to issuance of Applicant, City Engineer, Receipt of abandonment areas on the Specific Plan site. Existing wells in development areas grading permits for and California Division of completion letter from will be capped. development where Oil, Gas, and Geothermal DOGGR existing wells are Resources (DOGGR) located Standard Conditions and Requirements • The Community Development Director and City Engineer shall Prior to issuance of Applicant, Community Review of plans, site review and approve the project's conformance with contour grading grading permit Development Director, City inspection concept design consistent with recommendations in the City's Engineer Hillside Management Ordinance and City Council Resolution No. 2000-1874. Grading permits shall not be issued until 40-scale grading plans have been developed that incorporate contour grading techniques. The project shall be constructed in accordance with approved grading plans. • All commercial, industrial, institutional, and multi-family residential Prior to issuance of Applicant, Community Review of plans projects shall have the lighting system and its components building permits Development Director, City incorporated into the project and approved by the City of Moorpark Lighting Engineer Lighting Engineer prior to the issuance of a building permit for the project. Each lighting plan shall incorporate electrical plans and structural plans which detail the provision of lighting systems for exteriors of all buildings, parking lots, loading areas, walkways, public use areas, public art displays, fountains, or landscape areas (source: Moorpark Municipal Code §17.30.060). C 0 O CADocuments and Setfings\DanaP\My DocumentskNorth Park Village EIR\Draft MMP Table-030305[1].docCADacuments and Settings\DanaP\My DocumentsNorth Park Village EIRTraft MMP Table-030305111.doc 3 Mitigation VI O O O O North Park Specific Plan No. 2001 -01 Revised Draft Mitigation Monitoring Program TABLE 1 (continued) NORTH PARK SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 2001-01 MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM EIR Section /Mitigation Program Timing of Mitigation Responsible Party(ies) Monitoring Action • All lighting along the perimeter of natural areas, particularly street Prior to issuance of Applicant, Community Review of plans, site lights, shall be downcast luminaries and shall be shielded and building permits Development Director, City Inspection oriented in a manner that will prevent spillage or glare into the Lighting Engineer remaining natural and open space areas. Final lighting orientation and design shall be to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and Director of Community Development. All lighting proposed shall be consistent with Chapter 17.30 of the Municipal Code. • Prior to final inspection or issuance of a certificate of occupancy, Prior to final inspection Applicant, Community Site Inspection where applicable, the City of Moorpark Lighting Engineer shall or issuance of a Development Director, City cause to be performed a photometric field inspection of the certificate of occupancy Lighting Engineer approved lighting system for the project. The inspection shall verify the proper construction and installation of materials within the approved plan, determine the actual light patterns and values through light meter testing and observation, and determine the extent of any errant lighting. Deviations and /or violations shall be corrected prior to the final clearance for the project (source: Moorpark Municipal Code §17.30.080; Ord. 266 §2 (part), 1999). • Prior to the issuance of a Zoning Clearance for grading, the Prior to the issuance of Applicant, City Landscape Review of plans, site applicant shall submit a complete Landscape Plan, together with a Zoning Clearance for Architect consultant, inspection: if installed specifications and a separate Maintenance Plan. The Landscape grading permit or first Community Development landscaping is not in Plan shall encompass all areas required to be planted consistent Final Map, whichever Director compliance with the with the conditions of approval and the adopted Mitigation comes first Landscape Plan, issuance of subsequent building permits Monitoring and Reporting Program and shall incorporate the will be withheld recommendations of the biological resources mitigation program and Fire Hazard Reduction Program. The Landscape Plan shall be reviewed by the City of Moorpark Landscape Architect consultant and approved by the Community Development Director prior to Zoning Clearance for grading permit, or first Final Map approval, whichever occurs first. Mitigation Measures 1. Prior to the approval of any final tract maps, a detailed landscape Prior to the approval of Applicant, Restoration Review of plans, site plan shall be reviewed and approved by the City of Moorpark any final tract maps. Ecologist or Licensed inspection; if installed Community Development Department. The plan shall be prepared Landscape Architect, landscaping is not in and certified by a restoration ecologist or licensed landscape architect with expertise in native plant materials and habitat Community Development Director compliance with the Landscape Plan, issuance of subsequent building permits restoration, and shall comply with Community Development or release of improvement standard plans, adopted planned community regulations, and bonds will be withheld at the Standard Conditions of Approval. discretion of the Community Development Director until corrections are made CADocuments and Settings\LStringer \Local Settings \Temporary Internet FileMOLKS \Draft MMP Table-030705.docCADocuments and Settings \LStringer\Local Settings \Temporary Internet Files \01-K5 0raft MMP Table -030705.doc 4 Mitiga 0 0 0 North Park Specific Plan No. 2001 -01 Revised Draft Mitigation Monitoring Program TABLE 1 (continued) NORTH PARK SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 2001 -01 MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM EIR Section /Mitigation Program Timing of Mitigation Responsible Party(ies) Monitoring Action 2. All concrete structures, such as drainage ditches, detention basins, Prior to campletion_ef Applicant, Community Review of plans, site rip -rap, crib walls, swales, or curbs, located in natural areas shall be grading permit Development Director, City inspection; if installed constructed with colored concrete to blend with the surrounding terrain. issuance. Engineer incorrectly, issuance of subsequent building._permits or release of improvement bonds will be withheld at the discretion of the Community Develo ment Director until corrections are made 3. Above -grade infrastructure such as water tanks, water lines, etc. Prior to issuance of Community Development Review of plans, site shall be painted with a color approved by the City of Moorpark building permit Director, County of Ventura inspection; if installed Community Development Department and the County of Ventura Water and Sanitation incorrectly, issuance of Water and Sanitation Services Division so as to blend in with Services Division subsequent - buildina permits surrounding terrain. Landscaped berms shall be provided around or release of improvement the tanks to further screen the view of the tanks from surrounding bonds will be withheld at the areas, as determined necessary by the Community Development discretion of the Community Development Director until Director. corrections_ are made 3.3 Transportation and Circulation Project Design Features • E Street will be constructed as a two -lane collector road east from Sum in an amount Applicant, Community Review of plans, site Collins Drive /Campus Road to provide access to the Specific Plan and form satisfactory to Development Director, City inspection site. Engineer the City sufficient to ensure the timely cgtnoleti_v„n of_the m7prg\ ement shall be a condition of the approval of the applicable improvement !p ns As-a part -of Phase -A • Moorpark College Road will be constructed north from SR -118 to Surety in an amount Applicant, Community Review of plans, site the Specific Plan site as a four -lane arterial. This roadway will not ancl-tnrrrr satisfactory to Development Director, City inspection be constructed without the prior approval of a new SR -118 the City sufficient to Engineer, California interchange. ensure the timely Department of ggMp.letion of the Transportation irn,prDVement shall be a condition of the a roval of the applicable improvement plans. C.\Documents and Settings\DanaMMy Documents \North Park Village EIR \Draft MMP Table- 030305[1].docCADocuments and Settings \DanaP \My Documents \North Park Village EIR \Draft MMP Table- 030305[1].doc 5 Mitigation North Park Specific Plan No. 2001 -01 Revised Draft Mitigation Monitoring Program TABLE 1 (continued) NORTH PARK SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 2001 -01 MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM EIR Section /Mitigation Program Timing of Mitigation Responsible Party(ies) Monitoring Action • No vegetation in the Buildout Area (Phases B and C) shall be As_ specified inSee Applicant, Community Receipt of information la,y, removed and no land within the grading limits of Buildout shall be Project Design Feature Development Director, City Cpmmunity Development graded until the construction of the proposed interchange at Engineer, California Director to support findings SR -118, referred to in this Program EIR as the Moorpark College Department of Interchange at SR -118 and the roadway connecting the interchange Transportation to the Specific Plan site, referred to in this Program EIR as Moorpark College Road is: 1) fully permitted; 2) fully funded to ensure completion; 3) at a point of construction with completed and approved work representing at least 50 percent of budgeted construction costs; and 4) not more than 12 months from expected completion as determined by the City of Moorpark Community Development Director. This provision does not apply to vegetation removal or grading necessary for soils testing and archeological resources testing. The interchange and access roadway must be fully complete and accepted by the City of Moorpark and Caltrans prior to the issuance of any building permits for Phases B or C. Standard Conditions and Requirements • For all residential, commercial, and industrial entitlement permits, Prior to Planned Applicant Review of plans, site the applicant shall provide, where feasible and appropriate: Development permit inspection A. Transit stop improvements, including but not limited to bus approval pullouts, bus pads or shelters, as required by the decision - making body or other agency. B. Safe and convenient access for pedestrians and bicyclists from the external circulation system to onsite buildings or internal street/sidewalks (source: Moorpark Municipal Code §17.48.010). • As a condition of the issuance of a building permit for each Prior to issuance of Applicant Receipt of fees residential unit, the developer shall pay the City of Moorpark, a each building permit traffic mitigation fee as described herein ( "Citywide Traffic Fee "). The Citywide Traffic Fee may be expended by City in its sole and unfettered discretion. • Prior to issuance of a building permit, the developer shall pay to the Prior to issuance of Applicant, Community Receipt of fees City of Moorpark the Area of Contribution (AOC) Fees for Los building permits Development Director, City Angeles Avenue AOC. The developer shall also contribute to any Engineer cumulative traffic fee program adopted by the City prior to issuance of the first residential building permit for the project. AOC fees shall be those that are in effect at the time of building permit issuance. In addition to the ACC fees, the developer shall be required to make similar pro -rata contributions to any other traffic mitigation related pre- construction impact fees approved by the City Council to offset CADocuments and Settings\DanaMMy Documents \North Park Village EIR\Draft MMP Table- 030305[l) .docCADocuments and Settings \DanaP \My Documents\North Park Village EIR \Draft MMP Table- 030305[11.doc 6 Mitigation •e North Park Specific Plan No. 2001 -01 Revised Draft Mitigation Monitoring Program TABLE 1 (continued) NORTH PARK SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 2001 -01 MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM EIR Section /Mitigation Program Timing of Mitigation Responsible Party(ies) Monitoring Action the long -term effects on the City's street system. If the residential portion of the project is constructed prior to any such additional mitigation fee programs being adopted, for impacts to intersections outside of the Los Angeles Avenue Area of Contribution, a proportionate share of future improvement costs shall be collected for locations where project traffic has a measurable effect on cumulative traffic volumes. The City Traffic Engineer and Community Development Director shall determine the required contributions prior to issuance of building permits. Fees shall be paid prior to the issuance of these permits. • The applicant of the North Park Specific Plan project shall pay Prior to issuance of Applicant Receipt of fees County of Ventura Traffic Impact Mitigation Fees to fund roadway building permits and highway improvements on County facilities resulting in significant impacts to roadways in unincorporated Ventura County. The Specific Plan site is located within County Land Use District 4. Mitigation Measures 1. The proposed Specific Plan has identified improvements at the A ZObtains permits and Applicant, Community Review of plans, site intersection of Campus Park Drive and Collins Drive to alleviate provides surety for Development Director, City inspection congestion under short-range conditions due to background traffic completion: Prior to Engineer as well as project traffic. To mitigate the impacts of construction issuance of grading traffic on the intersection of Campus Park Drive at Collins Drive, the permits (except for planned improvement shall be completed prior to the construction of grading associated with the Specific Plan; ---04`40 aVIDid-the. need flar_rnitkjation during the new interchange and access rd.) itted X0 "Phinlpq to depart the GOnstructon site ?Completes only enter and dUF the h heur This is the numbel: ^f v °" i ^'° improvements: Prior to e p-r T peak Maximum that term traffic irnpaGt the iRteFGeGtl9R issuance of building would not create a sheFt at of GellinS Drive at Campus PaFk DFive. permit for first residential unit. 2. Prior to the issuance of the first grading permit, a traffic management and construction materials delivery plan shall be Prior to issuance of the first grading permit Applicant, Community Development Director, City Review of plans, observation of grading and construction prepared by the applicant and approved by the City Engineer and Engineer activities Community Development Director to monitor construction traffic and ensure that there are no additional impacts at the intersections along Collins Drive or anywhere else. The traffic management and construction materials delivery plan shall identify options for the construction - related access to the Specific Plan site including the use of Collins Drive and /or an access easement over Unocal property at the eastern end of Campus Park Drive, and details about the number of workers and their scheduling based on the phasing of the construction. The traffic management and C:\Documents and Settings \DanaP \My Documents \North Park Village EIR\Drafl MMP Table- 030305[1].docC: \Documents and Settings \DanaP \My Documents \North Park Village EIR \Draft MMP Table- 030305111.doc 7 Mitigation C 0 L© i 0 North Park Specific Plan No. 2001 -01 Revised Draft Mitigation Monitoring Program TABLE 1 (continued) NORTH PARK SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 2001 -01 MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM EIR Section /Mitigation Program Timing of Mitigation Responsible Party(ies) Monitoring Action construction materials delivery plan shall include details about the number of workers and their scheduling based on the phasing of the construction. The traffic management plan can include incentives offered to workers who carpool or vanpool, or satellite offsite parking lots can construction traffic and its impacts along Collins Drive. The traffic management plan is required to mitigate any and all construction traffic impacts. 3. The project applicant shall fund its pro -rata share of the costs of Prior to issuance of first Applicant, Community Receipt of fees improvements to the City of Moorpark intersections indicated in grading permit for ear_,h Development Director, City Table 3.3 -26. P N 4—St Engineer 4. [ ne project applicant shall fund its pro -rata share of the costs of Prior to issuance of first Applicant, Moorpark Receipt of fees improvements to the City of Moorpark intersections indicated in grading permit for each Community Development Table 3.3 -27. pgga e Director, and Moorpark City Engineer 3.4 Air Quality Standard Conditions and • All construction contractors shall comply with Ventura County Air During all grading and Applicant, City Engineer, Pollution Control District (VCAPCD) regulations, including Rule 51 construction activities Building Official (nuisance). The applicant shall comply with the following directives for controlling fugitive dust emissions from grading and excavation: a) During clearing, grading, earth moving, or excavation operations regular watering shall control dust. In addition the following measures shall apply: 1. --The area disturbed by clearing, grading, earth moving, or excavation operations shall be minimized to prevent excessive dust generation. 2. All trucks shall be required to cover their loads as required by California Vehicle Code §23114. 3. All graded and excavated material, exposed soil areas and active portions of the construction site including unpaved on -site roadways shall be treated to prevent fugitive dust. Treatment shall include, but not necessarily be limited to. periodic watering application of environmentally -safe soil stabilization materials and/or roll - compaction as appropriate Watering shall be done as often as necessary and reclaimed water shall be used whenever possible. Observation of grading and construction activities C'. \Documents and Settings \DanaP \My Documents \North Park Village EIR \Draft MMP Table- 030305[1].docC. \Documents and Settings\DanaP \My Documents \North Park Village EIR \Draft MMP Table- 030305[1].doc Mitigation O 0 O 0 North Park Specific Plan No. 2001 -01 Revised Draft Mitigation Monitoring Program TABLE 1 (continued) NORTH PARK SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 2001 -01 MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM EIR Section /Mitigation Program Timing of Mitigation Responsible Party(ies) Monitoring Action 4. Signs shall be_oosted on- site_limitin t_g., raffic.to 15 miles per hour or less. 5. Adiacent streets and roads shall be swept at least once per day, preferably at the end of the day, if visible soil material is carried over to adiacent streets and roads. 6. Water all site access roads and material excavated or graded onsite or offsite to prevent excessive amounts of dust. Watering shall occur a minimum of at least two times daily, preferably in the late morning and after the completion of work for the day. Additional watering for dust control shall occur as directed by the City. Application of water (preferably reclaimed if available) should penetrate sufficiently to minimize fuqitive dust during grading activities. The grading plan shall indicate the number of water trucks that will be available for dust control at each phase of grading. 7. Cease all clearing, grading, earthmoving, or excavation operations during periods of high winds (greater than 15 mph averaged over one hour). The contractor shall maintain contact with the Ventura County Air Pollution Control District (VCAPCD) meteorologist for current information about average wind speeds. Water or securely cover all material transported offsite and onsite to prevent excessive amounts of dust. 0-8. Keep all grading and construction equipment on or near the site until these activities are completed. 49. All employees involved in grading or excavation operations during dry periods shall use facemasks to reduce inhalation of dust. 6-.10. Wash off heavy -duty construction vehicles before they leave the site. During clearing, grading, earthmoving or excavation operations regular watering shall control dust. Water all site access roads and material excavated or graded onsite or offsite to prevent excessive amounts of dust. Watering shall occur a minimum of two times daily, preferably in the late morning and after the completion of work for the day. Additional watering for dust control shall occur as directed by the City. The grading plan shall indicate the number of water trucks that will be available CADocuments and Settings \DanaP \My Documents\North Park Village EIR \Draft MMP Table- 030305[1].docCADocuments and Settings \DanaP \My Documents \North Park Village EIR\Draft MMP Table- 030305[lj.doc 9 Mitigation 0 uQ i North Park Specific Plan No. 2001 -01 Revised Draft Mitigation Monitoring Program TABLE 1 (continued) NORTH PARK SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 2001 -01 MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM EIR Section /Mitigation Program Timing of Mitigation Responsible Party(ies) Monitoring Action for dust control at each phase of grading. b) After clearing, grading, earthmoving, or excavation operations, and during construction activities, fugitive dust emissions should be controlled using the following procedures: 1. Apply non - hazardous chemical stabilizers to all inactive portions of the construction site. When appropriate, seed exposed surfaces with a fast growing, soil binding plant to reduce wind erosion and its contribution to local particulate levels. 2. Periodically, or as directed by the City Engineer, sweep public streets in the vicinity of the site to remove silt (i.e., fine earth material transported from the site by wind, vehicular activities, water runoff, etc.), which may have accumulated from construction activities. 3. During smog season (May through October), the City shall order that construction cease during Stage III alerts to minimize the number of vehicles and equipment operating, lower ozone levels and protect equipment operators from excessive smog levels. The City, at its discretion, may also limit construction during Stage 11 alerts. 4 Graded and /or excavated inactive areas of the construction site shall be monitored by the City Engineer at least weekly for dust stabilization. Soil stabilization methods such as water and roll - compaction and environmentally -safe dust control materials shall be periodically applied to portions of the construction site that are inactive for over four days. Upon completion of grading and excavation operations within an area, the area shall be seeded and watered until ground. coverass growth is evident, or periodically treated with environmentally -safe dust suppressants. to prevent excess.iv_e fugitive dust.. c) The following fugitive dust control measures recommended by the VCAPCD shall be evaluated by the City and by the applicant and shall be implemented if they are found feasible and have not already been incorporated in the preceding mitigation measures: CADocuments and Settings \DanaP \My Documents \North Park Village EIR \Draft MMP Table- 030305[l] .docC1Documents and Settings \DanaP \My Documents \North Park Village EIR \Draft MMP Table- 030305[i].doc 10 Mitigation 0 0 0 0 CJ North Park Specific Plan No. 2001 -01 Revised Draft Mitigation Monitoring Program TABLE 1 (continued) NORTH PARK SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 2001 -01 MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM EIR Section /Mitigation Program Timing of Mitigation Responsible Party(ies) Monitoring Action 1. Dust control requirements shall be shown on all grading plans. 2. All trucks shall be required to cover their loads as required by California Vehicle Code §23114. 3. Signs shall be posted onsite limiting vehicle speed to 15 miles per hour or less. 4. All site access roads shall be paved at least 100 feet from the main road. 5. There shall be at least one qualified and authorized person onsite each work day to enforce the provisions of the Fugitive Dust Mitigation Plan and any other applicable fugitive rules, ordinances, or conditions. 6. Personnel involved in grading operations should be advised to wear respiratory protection in accordance with California Division of Occupational Safety and Health regulations. 7. All project construction operations shall be conducted in compliance with all applicable Ventura County Air Pollution Control District Rules and Regulations with emphasis on Rule 50 (Opacity) and Rule 51 (Nuisance). • The applicant shall comply with the following measures, as feasible, During all grading and Applicant, City Engineer, Observation of grading and to reduce NOX and ROC from heavy equipment as recommended construction activities Building Official construction activities by the Ventura County Air Pollution Control District in its Ventura County Air Quality Assessment Guidelines. s)a) Minimize equipment idling time. Turn equipment off when not in use for more than five minutes. b) Maintain equipment engines in good condition and in proper tune as per manufacturers' specifications. c) Lengthen the construction period during smog season (May through October) to minimize the number of vehicles and equipment operating at the same time. Use alternatively fueled construction equipment. such as corripressed._natural gas (C�, liquefied natural as LNG) or electric if feasible. • Comply with all applicable provisions of the City of Moorpark's Transportation Demand Management ordinance. CADocuments and Settings \DanaP \My Documents \North Park Village EIR \Draft MMP Table- 030305[1].docC \Documents and Settings \DanaP\My Documents \North Park Village EIR \Draft MMP Table- 030305[li.doc 11 Mitigation C 0 N A North Park Specific Plan No. 2001 -01 Revised Draft Mitigation Monitoring Program TABLE 1 (continued) NORTH PARK SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 2001 -01 MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM EIR Section /Mitigation Program Timing of Mitigation Responsible Party(ies) Monitoring Action Mitigation Measures 1. In order to reduce diesel fuel engine emissions, the project Prior to issuance of Applicant, City Engineer Review of specifications applicant shall require that all construction bid packages include a grading permit separate "Diesel Fuel Reduction Plan." This plan shall identify the actions to be taken to reduce diesel fuel emissions during construction activities (inclusive of grading and excavation activities). Reductions in diesel fuel emissions can be achieved by measures including, but not limited to, the following: a) use of alternative energy sources, such as compressed natural gas or liquefied petroleum gas, in mobile equipment and vehicles; b) use of "retrofit technology," including diesel particulate trips, on existing diesel engines and vehicles; and c) other appropriate measures. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the Diesel Fuel Reduction Plan shall be filed with the City of Moorpark Community Development Department. The Diesel Fuel Reduction Plan shall include the following provisions: a. All diesel fueled off -road construction equipment shall be California Air Resources Board (CARB) certified or use post - combustion controls that reduce pollutant emissions to the same level as CARB certified equipment. CARB certified off - road engines are engines that are three years old or less and comply with lower emission standards. Post - combustion controls are devices that are installed downstream of the engine on the tailpipe to treat the exhaust. These devices are now widely used on construction equipment and are capable of removing over 90 percent of the PM10, carbon monoxide, and volatile organic compounds from engine exhaust, depending on the specific device, sulfur content of the fuel, and specific engine. The most common and widely used post- combustion control devices are particulate traps (i.e., soot filters), oxidation catalysts, and combinations thereof. b. All diesel -. on-road construction emission standards applicable to the most current year to the greatest extent possible. To achieve this standard, new vehicles shall be used or older vehicles shall use post- combustion controls that reduce pollutant emissions to the qreatest extent feasible. C: \Documents and Settings \DanaP \My Documents \North Park Village EIR \Draft MMP Table- 030305[1].docC. \Documents and Settings \DanaP \My Documents \North Park Village EIR \Draft MMP Table- 030305[1].doc 12 Mitigation C 0 Vt North Park Specific Plan No. 2001 -01 Revised Draft Mitigation Monitoring Program TABLE 1 (continued) NORTH PARK SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 2001 -01 MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM EIR Section /Mitigation Program Timing of Mitigation Responsible Party(ies) Monitoring Action c. The effectiveness of the latest diesel emission controls is highly dependant on the sulfur content of the fuel. Therefore, diesel fuel used by on -road and off -road construction equipment shall be low sulfur ( >15 ppm) or other alternative low polluting diesel fuel formulation such as PuriNOxTM or Amber363. Low sulfur diesel fuel shall be required by existing regulations after the year 2007 and it is already being produced and sold as the regulation is phased in. 2. Prior to the issuance of a building permit for the construction for Prior to issuance of a Applicant, Community Receipt of fees each residential unit and the commercial center, the developer shall building permit for each Development Director make a contribution to the Moorpark Traffic Systems Management residential unit and the commercial center (TSM) Fund to fund TSM programs or clean -fuel vehicles programs, as determined by the City of Moorpark using the latest URBEMIS program for reactive organic compounds or nitrogen oxide emissions in excess of the daily threshold over a three -year period from Buildout. Fees shall be assessed in accordance with the Ventura County Air Pollution Control District Assessment Guidelines. 37Prior -to the approval of each - -future subdivision ... in association - with ...the Prior .to...each Final Map Applicant; .Community Review of- Final -Maps North Part, Specific PlaR, operational - -- emission reduction included in the South Coast Air QuaTlify approval Development DiFeGto measures Management - District's - CEQA - - -Air Quality - Handbook -- shall - -. be implemented, if found applicable and feasible for that subdivision. "d determination of appliiaabil4y and feasibility shall be made by the -6 ty--o€- Moorpark - Community Development- 8ifeete� 3. Prior to the issuance of the first building permit, the applicant shall Prior to issuance of the Applicant, Community Review of energy calculations demonstrate to the City of Moorpark that all North Park Specific first building permits Development Director, Plan structures have been designed and shall be constructed to be Building Official at least 20 percent more energy efficient than required by the energy efficiency standards of the State Building Code, Title 24, California Code of Regulations _Part 6— California Energy ffici encV Standards for Residential and Nonresidential &uklings). 3.5 Noise Standard Conditions and Requirements • Construction activities shall be limited to between 7:00 a.m. and During all grading and Applicant Observation of grading and 7:00 p.m., Monday through Saturday. Construction work on construction activities construction activities Saturdays will require payment of a premium for City inspection services, and may be further restricted or prohibited should the City receive complaints from adjacent property owners. No construction work is to be done on Sundays, and City observed holidays pursuant to Section 15.26.010 of the Municipal Code. C'. \Documents and Settings \DanaP \My Documents \North Park Village EIR \Draft MMP Table- 030305[1].docC: \Documents and Settings \DanaP \My Documents \North Park Village EIR \Draft MMP Table- 030305[11.doc 13 Mitigation O uo r North Park Specific Plan No. 2001 -01 Revised Draft Mitigation Monitoring Program TABLE 1 (continued) NORTH PARK SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 2001 -01 MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM EIR Section /Mitigation Program Timing of Mitigation Responsible Party(ies) Monitoring Action Mitigation Measures 1. The developer shall ensure that construction equipment is fitted with During all grading and Applicant, City Engineer, Observation of grading and modern sound reduction equipment. construction activities Building Official construction activities a) Stationary noise sources that exceed 70 dBA of continuous noise generation (at 50 feet) shall be shielded with temporary barriers if existing residences are within 350 feet of the noise source. 1c. Provision of ca.pies of communication materials and return receipts to the City E_Int 11eer_E4i_ neerriin . Deb <rberY b) Designated parking areas for construction worker vehicles and for materials storage and assembly shall be provided. These areas shall be set back as far as possible from or otherwise 1d.Acceptance of construction effects mitigation program shielded from existing surrounding rural residential by! Cif neighborhoods. c) Immediately surrounding property owners shall be notified in writing on a monthly basis of construction schedules involving major grading, including when clearing and grading is to begin. The project developer shall notify adjacent residents and property owners by Certified Mail- Return Receipt Requested, of the starting date for removal of vegetation and commencement of site grading. The content of this required communication shall be approved by the City Engineer in advance of its mailing and the return receipts, evidencing United States mail delivery, shall be provided to the Engineering Department. d) A construction effects mitigation program shall be prepared and submitted to the City after completion and occupancy of the first phase of project development. This program shall protect, to the degree feasible, new residents from the impacts of sustained construction noise on new neighborhoods. 2. When final grading plans become available and prior to grading Prior to issuance of Applicant, Acoustical Review of plans permit issuance, an acoustical analysis shall be performed to grading permits Engineer, Community determine the exact height and location of barriers required to meet Development Director the City exterior noise standards. This analysis shall be prepared by a qualified acoustical engineer and be reviewed and approved by the City prior to permit issuance. A wall with a maximum height of 6.5 feet would reduce traffic noise levels to below 65 CNEL for homes along a roadway. Homes may be required to provide approximately 25 dB of outdoor -to- indoor noise reduction. With typical residential construction, at least 20 dB of outdoor -to- indoor noise reduction is achieved with windows closed. Air conditioning of residential units provides adequate ventilation to assume that CADocuments and Settings \DanaP \My Documents\North Park Village EIR\Draft MMP Table- 030305[1].docCADocuments and Settings \DanaP \My Documents\North Park Village EIR \Draft MMP Table- 030305[11.doc 14 Mitigation 0 0 O 0 N North Park Specific Plan No. 2001 -01 Revised Draft Mitigation Monitoring Program TABLE 1 (continued) NORTH PARK SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 2001 -01 MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM EIR Section /Mitigation Program Timing of Mitigation Responsible Party(ies) Monitoring Action windows remain closed. With additional building upgrades, outdoor -to- indoor noise reductions of up to 32 dB can be achieved. All residences would require less than 32 dB of outdoor -to- indoor noise reduction. 3. At the time detailed architectural drawings become available and Prior to issuance of Applicant, Acoustical Review of acoustical analysis prior to building permit issuance, an acoustical analysis shall be building permits Engineer, Community performed that outlines a program for implementation of the Noise Development Director Standard of 65 CNEL (Community Noise Equivalent Level) is attained at all locations within the development. The City also requires that interior noise levels attributable to exterior noise sources not exceed 45 CNEL. The program shall specify any upgrades to the standard construction required to meet the standard. This analysis should be prepared by a qualified acoustical engineer and be reviewed and approved by the City prior to permit issuance. 4. The City of Moorpark Community Development Director shall review Prior to issuance of Applicant, Acoustical Review of proposed uses all uses to be located at the Neighborhood Commercial site. If the building permits for Engineer, Community City determines that any proposed use will potentially exceed the tenant improvements Development Director Noise Ordinance limits, an acoustical analysis shall be prepared to ensure that the use does not violate the Noise Ordinance. The analysis shall document the sources of noise generated by the use and show compliance with the Noise Ordinance and any measures required for compliance. This analysis shall be prepared by a qualified acoustical engineer and be reviewed and approved by the City of Moorpark Community Development Director prior to permit issuance. 3.6 Biological Resources Project Design Features • Open Space Nature Preserve. This project design feature would Prior to issuance of the Applicant, Community Acceptance of dedication fiWst. or_3din.gpc;rmit_in offset the impacts on coastal sage scrub vegetation and native Development Director grassland vegetation. Approximately 2,121 acres of the site will be e @ch phase or recohinra of the Final Map, preserved in the Natural Preserve. Table 3.6 -5 of the Final Program EIR lists the acres of habitat located within the Natural whichever_ comes._ first, Preserve. 707 ' acres of the Nature Preserve will be dedicated to the City,. Uses within the Natural Preserve are proposed to be limited to the following: biological and cultural research, education, management, ". "--- " " " " " " " -- "--- " ".._.. revegetation, restoration, and enhancement, astronomical observatory, all oil and gas activities within the easements and quitclaims granted prior to the enactment of the Specific Plan, and hiking trails and utility and water transmission lines necessary to C'. \Documents and Settings0anaRkly Documents \North Park Village EIMDraft MMP Table- 030305[l] .docC:Tocuments and Settings0anaPWy Documents \North Park Village EIMDraft MMP Table- 030305[1].doc 15 Mitigation North Park Specific Plan No. 2001 -01 Revised Draft Mitigation Monitoring Program TABLE 1 (continued) NORTH PARK SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 2001 -01 MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM EIR Section /Mitigation Program Timing of Mitigation Responsible Party(ies) Monitoring Action connect permitted public or quasi - public facility uses to adjust development. • A Conservation Organization shall be chosen by the City of Moorpark (in coordination with U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and the California Department of Fish and Game if necessitated by any regulatory permitting requirements) to manage the Nature Preserve. The project applicant shall provide a mechanism (such as a non - Prior to issuance of first grading permit Applicant, Community Development Director.. CA Council Acceptance of a conservation organization and funding mechanism for the conservation organization wasting endowment or landscape maintenance district) acceptable to both the City and the Conservation Organization to fund ongoing management costs of the Conservation Organization. • Culverts with a minimum diameter of five feet shall be provided under the access road connecting the Specific Plan site to the SR- 118 Moorpark College Interchange. In addition, an underpass shall be constructed under this access road approximately 500 feet south Pre - Construction: S.ra to establish a bafielirte from which success can be Applicant, Wildlife Biologist, Community Development Director,_CityEngineer Review of plans_,biological s trv_eysi -site inspection of Hidden Creek Canyon. The east side of the underpass shall measured during and after construction shall connect with an access road along which shall be placed wildlife fencing. The wildlife fencing shall be placed along the west side of be started at least one the access road and guide wildlife to the underpass. The west side year prior to issuance of of the underpass shall open up immediately into natural open space. The bottom of the underpass shall have a natural substrate gracting.pggpits so that pre,-construction>, data to facilitate wildlife movement. The dimensions of the underpass from each of the four shall meet the minimum requirements needed for mule deer to pass seasons will have been through. The opening (from one end of the underpass to the other) caliscted. shall be 0.9 or greater based on the following mathematical formula: height times (width divided by length) equals 0.9 or greater. Wildlife guzzlers shall be installed at the existing crossing of the SR -118 and near all new project culverts and underpasses selected for wildlife movement. A guzzler is an underground water trap that provides a perennial source of water for wildlife. Installation of Construction: During eo} structisn- otaccess mad. Monitoring: Annually -for Applicant ,- W+id44 -- Biologist, Community 04feCtar Ongoing observation and reporting, ,.alor�q.wlth, nspecfiQn_ofccn . olete improvernent_s these wildlife guzzlers near project culverts encourages movement to and through these potentially new wildlife crossings. In addition, these guzzlers and project culverts, including those under SR -118 and the underpass of the access road, will be monitored by a qualified wildlife biologist for three years to document their effectiveness of use by wildlife species. Monitoring methods shall include use of camera, track plates, or diatomaceous earth or other acceptable means to determine wildlife use at selected locations. A minimum of six surveys per each of the four seasons shall be conducted to determine wildlife movement at the culverts under SR- 118 and the culverts and underpass under the access road to SR- theee yearn beg' ^^ ^^ ai#eF Giamplet+sa of buildout Past Construction Monitoring, shall consist Review of mgnitoril,gr arts by the ComnL!LiA Develop rnen!_Director_arxl modification...... to „wildlife. crossings as eter;nined necessary ythe_CCommunit• ofas minimum of six surveys per each of the t7ev..etc�_ ,ment_Director -in col sultatian with the wildlife 11.1 bic!ac ist. four seasons throughout the 31ear post - construction monitorinq 118 shall be conducted throughout the three -year monitoring program. program. CADocuments and Settings\DanaMMy Documents \North Park Village EIR \Draft MMP Table- 03030511] .docCADocuments and Settings \DanaP \My Documents \North Park Village EIR \Draft MMP Table- 030305[1].doc 16 Mitigation to North Park Specific Plan No. 2001-01 Revised Draft Mitigation Monitoring Program TABLE 1 (continued) NORTH PARK. SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 2001-01 MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM EIR Section/Mitigation Program Timing of Mitigation Responsible Party(lies) Monitoring Action P - re-cx)"464t4c - tiop the same methods used tql 3j baseline from which success Zan-be –.1 ..... . . ....... Meastifed dtff4rig-and after construction. at.least one to — co4istructiori data from each -of- the -foci r seasons will have been co;&c4ed- Reports shall be prepared and submitted to the City of Moorpark Community Development Director and to any appropriate agency on an annual basis. Each report shall include the findings of the wildlife movement surveys and all pertinent details regarding project design features intended for wildlife use. Based on the findings of monitoring, recommendations to enhance wildlife movement through SR-118 crossings or through the new culverts and underpass of the access road that connects the Specific Plan site with the interchange at SR-118 shall be provided as appropriate (e.g., fencing modification, vegetation enhancement, lighting adjustment, etc.). Standard Conditions and Requirements • The applicant shall be required to obtain all Clean Water Act 401 Prior to issuance of any Applicant, U.S. Army Corps Receipt of applicable permits and 404 permits and clearances as administered by the U.S. Army grading permits of Engineers, Regional Corps of Engineers and the Regional Water Quality Control Water Quality Control Board, Compliance with and Board/State Water Resources Board. These permits shall be Community Development successful implementation of measure(s) will be determined obtained prior to initiating any grading permits or clearing and Director by the regulatory agencies grubbing activities not covered under the City's grading ordinance. All conditions of the permits and certifications from these agencies that are designed to minimize impacts to biological resources and all measures to mitigate for the loss of jurisdictional habitats shall be C: \Documents and Settings\DanaP\My DocumentsNorth Park Village EIR\Draft MMP Table-030305[1].docCADocuments and Settings\DanaP\My DocumentsNNorth Park Village EIR\Draft MMP Table-030305[il.doc 17 Mitigation 0 0 0 N O North Park Specific Plan No. 2001 -01 Revised Draft Mitiqation Monitonnq Proqram TABLE 1 (continued) NORTH PARK SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 2001-01 MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM EIR Section /Mitigation Program Timing of Mitigation Responsible Party(ies) Monitoring Action implemented. Implementation of mitigation designed to offset impacts to areas of federal jurisdiction shall be monitored by the relevant agencies and by the City (under the California Environmental Quality Assurance Program) for the project. Mitigation Measures 1. The impact to coastal sage scrub shall be mitigated at an acreage Program: Prior to Applicant, Biologist, Review of revegetation ratio of 2:1. Coastal sage scrub habitat shall be preserved onsite issuance of first grading Community Development program within the Nature Preserve as described in the Project Design permit Director Features. As part of the project, 74.3 acres of coastal sage scrub shall be restored in the Nature Preserve. The revegetation program shall be developed by a qualified biologist and submitted to the City of Moorpark Community Development Director for review and approval prior to issuance of the first grading permit. Restoration shall consist of seeding with appropriate sage scrub Restoration: As set forth Applicant, Biologist, Site inspection species. in mitigation measure Community Development A detailed conceptual mitigation plan shall be developed and Director implemented and contain the following items: a. Responsibilities and qualifications of the personnel to implement and supervise the plan. The- responsibilities of the landowner, specialists, and maintenance personnel that will supervise and implement the plan shall be specified. b. Site selection. The site(s) for restoration shall be determined in coordination with the project applicant, the City of Moorpark, and the biologist. The site shall be located in the Nature Preserve, and be contiguous with other natural open space areas. c. Site preparation and planting implementation. The site preparation shall include: 1) protection of existing native species, 2) trash and weed removal, 3) native species salvage and reuse (i.e., duff), 4) soil treatments (i.e., imprinting, decompacting), 5) erosion control measures (i.e., rice or willow wattles), and 6) seed mix application. e-d. Schedule. Site restoration shall be conducted between October and January 30. Introduction of hydroseed mix and container plants shall take place immediately after preparation of the restoration sites. CADocuments and Settings\DanaRMy Documents \North Park Village EIR\Draft MMP Table- 030305[7].docCADocuments and Settings \DanaP\My Documents\North Park Village EIR \Draft MMP Table- 030305[l] .doc 18 Mitigation O N N North Park Specific Plan No. 2001 -01 Revised Draft Mitigation Monitoring Program TABLE 1 (continued) NORTH PARK SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 2001 -01 MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM EIR Section /Mitigation Program Timing of Mitigation Responsible Party(ies) Monitoring Action f.-e. Maintenance plan /guidelines. The maintenance plan shall Monitoring: Three to five Applicant. Biologist. Ongoing observation and years include: 1) weed control, 2) herbivory control, 3) trash removal, Community Development reporting Director 4) irrigation system maintenance, 5) maintenance training, and 6) replacement planting. Compliance with and f. Monitoring Plan. The Monitoring Plan shall include: successful implementation of measures) will be determined 1) qualitative monitoring (i.e., photographs and general by the Community observations), 2) quantitative monitoring (i.e., randomly placed transects), 3) performance criteria as approved by the resource Development Director agencies, 4) monthly reports for the first year and bimonthly reports thereafter, and 5) annual reports which shall be submitted to the resource agencies for three to five years. The monitoring shall be conducted for three to five years, depending upon the performance of the site and as approved by the City's Community Development Director. g. Long -term preservation. Long -term preservation of the site shall be outlined in the conceptual mitigation plan to ensure the mitigation is not impacted by future development. € h. Performance standards shall be in the conceptual plan and apply to the revegetation of sage scrub. At a minimum in the conceptual plan, revegetation shall be considered successful at three to five years if the percent cover and species diversity of the restored and /or created habitat areas are similar to percent cover and species diversity of adjacent existing habitats, as determined by quantitative testing of existing and restored areas. If the performance standards are not met in five years, the applicant shall meet with the City of Moorpark and develop appropriate remedial measures for habitat loss. The non - native species cover on the revegetation at the end of the monitoring period shall be less than 10 percent. In addition, earthmoving equipment shall avoid maneuvering in areas outside the identified limits of grading in order to avoid disturbing open spaces that will remain undeveloped. Prior to grading, the natural open space limits shall be marked by the construction supervisor and project biologist. These limited shall be identified on the grading plan. The applicant shall submit a letter to the City of Moorpark verifying that construction limits have been flagged in the field. No earthmoving equipment shall be allowed within the open space areas without the approval of the project biologist and the City of Moorpark. C: \Documents and Settings \DanaP \My Documents \North Park Village EIR \Draft MMP Table- 030305(l].docC. \Documents and Settings\DanaMMy Documents \North Park Village EIR \Draft MMP Table- 030305(i].doc 19 Mitigation North Park Specific Plan No. 2001 -01 Revised Draft Mitigation Monitoring Program TABLE 1 (continued) NORTH PARK SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 2001 -01 MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM EIR Section /Mitigation Program Timing of Mitigation Responsible Party(ies) Monitoring Action 2. Foothill needlegrass grassland shall be restored in the Nature Program: Prior to Applicant, Biologist, Review of restoration program Preserve at an acreage ratio of 2:1. The project requires 5.6 acres issuance of first grading Community Development of foothill needlegrass grassland shall be restored in the Nature permit Director Preserve. A native grass restoration program shall be developed by a qualified biologist and submitted to the City of Moorpark Community Development Director for review and approval prior to issuance of the first grading permits. Restoration shall consist of seeding with appropriate needlegrass species. The conceptual mitigation plan shall be developed and implemented and shall contain the following items: a. Responsibilities and qualifications of the personnel to implement and supervise the plan. The responsibilities of the landowner, specialists, and maintenance personnel that will supervise and implement that plan shall be specified. b. Site selection. The site(s) for restoration shall be determined in Restoration: As set forth Applicant, Biologist, Site inspection coordination with the project applicant, the City of Moorpark, in mitigation measure Community Development and the biologist. The site shall be located in the Nature Director Preserve, and be contiguous with other natural open space areas. c. Site preparation and planting implementation. The site preparation shall include: 1) protection of existing native species, 2) trash and weed removal, 3) native species salvage and reuse (i.e., duff), 4) soil treatments (i.e., imprinting, decompacting), 5) erosion control measures (i.e., rice or willow wattles), and 6) seed mix application. d. Schedule. Site restoration shall be conducted between October and January 30. Introduction of hydroseed mix and container plants shall take place immediately after preparation of the restoration sites. e. Maintenance plan /guidelines. The maintenance plan shall include: 1) weed control, 2) herbivory control, 3) trash removal, 4) irrigation system maintenance, 5) maintenance training, and 6) replacement planting. C) 8 C C) N CADocuments and Settings\DanaP \My Documents \North Park Village EIR \Draft MMP Table - 030305[1] docCADocuments and Settings \DanaP \My Documents\North Park Village EIR \Draft MMP Table- 030305[1].doc 20 Mitigation N North Park Specific Plan No. 2001 -01 Revised Draft Mitigation Monitoring Program TABLE 1 (continued) NORTH PARK SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 2001 -01 MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM EIR Section /Mitigation Program Timing of Mitigation Responsible Party(ies) Monitoring Action f. Monitoring Plan. The Monitoring Plan shall include: Monitoring: Three to five Applicant, Biologist, Ongoing observation and 1) qualitative monitoring (i.e., photographs and general years Community Development reporting observations), 2) quantitative monitoring (i.e., randomly placed Director transects), 3) performance criteria as approved by the resource Compliance with and agencies, 4) monthly reports for the first year and bimonthly successful implementation of reports thereafter, and 5) annual reports which shall be measure(s) will be determined submitted to the resource agencies for three to five years. The by the CammlUnity monitoring shall be conducted for three to five years, Develpj,�ai � t depending upon the performance of the site and as approved Dire tpl.+ata y..ar_,3es by the City of Moorpark. If the performance standards are not met in the first five years, the applicant shall meet with the City of Moorpark and develop appropriate remedial measures for habitat loss. g. Long -term preservation. Long -term preservation of the site shall be outlined in the conceptual mitigation plan to ensure the mitigation is not impacted by future development. h. Performance standards shall be identified and apply to the restoration of foothill needlegrass grassland. Revegetation shall be considered successful at three to five years if the percent cover and species diversity of the restored and /or created habitat areas are similar to percent cover and species diversity of adjacent existing habitats, as determined by quantitative testing of existing, restored, and created habitat areas. 3. Phase A would impact 4.23 acres of U.S. Army Corps of Engineers 404 Permit and 1600 Applicant, Biologist, Receipt of applicable permits (USACE) jurisdictional "water of the U.S." within Specific Plan Streambed Alteration Community Development development area; Buildout would impact an additional 2.32 acres, Agreement: Prior to Director, Applicant, USACE, totaling 4.75 acres (RBF Consulting, 2002). With respect to the issuance of first grading and CDFG California Fish and Game (CDFG) jurisdictional boundaries within permit the development area, Phase A would impact 16.63 acres and Buildout would impact an additional 8.40 acres, thus totaling 25.03 acres. 0 0 NC \Documents and Settings \DanaP \My Documents \North Park Village EIR \Draft MMP Table- 030305]1].docC \Documents and Settings \DanaP \My Documents \North Park Village EIR \Draft MMP Table- 030305]1].doc 21 Mitigation CJ O 0 0 N North Park Specific Plan No. 2001 -01 Revised Draft Mitigation Monitoring Program TABLE 1 (continued) NORTH PARK SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 2001 -01 MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM EIR Section /Mitigation Program Timing of Mitigation Responsible Party(ies) Monitoring Action Compensatory mitigation for the loss of wetland or riparian function and values is a fundamental component of the USACE and the CDFG permitting process. The objective of the mitigation is to ensure no net loss of habitat values from the project. Mitigation can consist of: 1) avoidance or minimization of impacts; 2) compensation in the form of habitat restoration; or 3) compensation through participation in a mitigation bank. Avoidance and minimization of impacts is preferred. Any compensation though restoration shall be onsite and in kind. The exact requirements for any special permit condition established for the proposed project would be determined by the USACE and /or the CDFG following review of the formally submitted project application. The applicant shall develop a detailed program prior to the issuance of the first grading permit to ensure no net loss of habitat values from the site which contains the following components: a) Responsibilities and qualifications of the personnel to implement and supervise the plan. The responsibilities of the landowner, specialists, and maintenance personnel that will supervise and implement that plan shall be specified. b) Site selection. The site for mitigation shall be determined in Mitigation Applicant, Biologist, As set forth in 404 Permit and coordination with the project applicant and resource agencies. Implementation: As set Community Development 1600 Streambed Alteration The site shall either be located on the Specific Plan site in the forth in 404 Permit and Director, USACE, and Agreement Nature Preserve or dedicated open space area shall be 1600 Streambed CDFG purchased offsite. Appropriate sites must have suitable Alteration Agreement hydrology and soils for the establishment of riparian species. c) Site preparation and planting implementation. The site preparation shall include: 1) protection of existing native species, 2) trash and weed removal, 3) native species salvage and reuse (i.e., duff), 4) soil treatments (i.e., imprinting, decompacting), 5) erosion control measures (i.e., rice or willow wattles), 6) seed mix application, 7) seed mix application, and 8) container species. d) Schedule. A schedule shall be developed which includes planting to occur late in fall and early winter between October and January 30. C Tocuments and Settings \DanaP \My Documents \North Park Village EIR \Draft MMP Table- 030305[11.docC. \Documents and Settings\DanaP \My Documents \North Park Village EIR \Draft MMP Table- 030305[1].doc 22 Mitigation C C N North Park Specific Plan No. 2001 -01 Revised Draft Mitigation Monitoring Program TABLE 1 (continued) NORTH PARK SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 2001 -01 MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM EIR Section /Mitigation Program Timing of Mitigation Responsible Party(ies) Monitoring Action e) Maintenance plan /guidelines. The maintenance plan shall include: 1) weed control, 2) herbivory control, 3) trash removal, 4) irrigation system maintenance, 5) maintenance training, and 6) replacement planting. f) Monitoring Plan. The Monitoring Plan shall include: 1) Monitoring: Five years Qualified biologist, Moorpark Ongoing observation and qualitative monitoring (i.e., photographs and general or as set forth in 404 Community Development reporting or as set forth in 404 observations), 2) quantitative monitoring (i.e., randomly placed Permit and 1600 Director, Applicant, USACE, Permit or Streambed transects), 3) performance criteria as approved by the resource Streambed Alteration and CDFG Alteration Agreement agencies, 4) monthly reports for the first year and bimonthly Agreement reports thereafter, and 5) annual reports which shall be submitted to the resource agencies on an annual basis. The site shall be monitored and maintained for five years to ensure successful establishment of riparian habitat within the restored and create areas; however, if there is successful coverage prior to five years, the project applicant may request to be released from monitoring requirements from USACE and CDFG and as approved by the City of Moorpark. g) Long -term Preservation. Long -term preservation of the site shall be outlined in the conceptual mitigation plan to ensure the mitigation is not impacted by future development. A conservation easement and a performance bond shall be secured prior to implementation of the site. h) Plan Approval. The plan shall be subject to review and Plan Approval: Prior to Applicant, Biologist. Receipt of approved plan issuance of first grading approval by the Community Development Director of the City of Community Development Moorpark, in coordination with CDFG. ep rmit Director, Applicant, USACE. and CDFG [�J_ln addition, earthmoving equipment shall avoid maneuvering in areas outside the identified limits of grading in order to avoid Note on rq ading plans Applicant, Community disturbing open spaces that will remain undeveloped. Prior to C7evtopmentDevelopment Director grading, the natural open space limits shall be marked by the construction supervisor and project biologist. These limited shall be identified on the grading plan. The applicant shall submit a letter to the City of Moorpark verifying that construction limits have been flagged in the field. CADocuments and Settings \DanaP \My Documents \North Park Village EIRTraft MMP Table- 030305[1].docCADocuments and Settings\DanaMMy Documents\North Park Village EIR \Draft MMP Table- 030305[1].doc 23 Mitigation C 0 N North Park Specific Plan No. 2001 -01 Revised Draft Mitiqation Monitonnq Proqram TABLE 1 (continued) NORTH PARK SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 2001 -01 MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM EIR Section /Mitigation Program Timing of Mitigation Responsible Party(ies) Monitoring Action 4. A total of 534 trees will be impacted by Phase A and an additional Inventory: Prior to Applicant, Arborist, Verification of inventory 175 trees by Buildout. The project shall be designed to avoid trees issuance of first grading Community Development to the greatest extent practicable. If this impact cannot be avoided, permit Director an inventory of oak trees on the proposed development site shall be updated by an arborist approved by the City of Moorpark Community Development Director prior to the removal of oak trees on the Specific Plan Site. The inventory shall record the location and size of individual oak and walnut trees that are 9.5 inches diameter at breast height (dbh) or larger including dead or dying trees on the proposed development site. The inventory shall also include the dbh, height, canopy width, aesthetic rating, health rating, number of trunks, and appraisal value of each oak tree. Prior to grading, orange snow fencing shall be installed around the Fence Installation: Prior Applicant, Biologist, and Site inspection trees (outside the dripline) that would not be impacted by to grading Community Development construction. Fencing shall be in place and inspected by the project Director biologist prior to the commencement of grading. This fencing shall remain in place throughout the construction in the vicinity of the fenced trees until the Community Development Director determines that the fences can be removed without placing the trees in jeopardy of damage from construction. As stated in Moorpark Municipal Code 12.12.070(F), 'The Director Implementation: As Applicant, Community Review of plans, site of Community Development, or his or her designee, shall cause an noted in mitigation Development Director inspection, receipt of fees (as appraisal of the value of said trees to be prepared in accordance measure applicable) with Section 12.12.050C. The resulting value shall be applied to upgrading the size of tree plantings associated with the project." The replacement of coast live oak trees shall occur at a minimum 3:1 ratio based on the appraisal value of the trees as set forth in Municipal Code 12.12.070 (f). Oak trees relocated into landscape areas of the Specific Plan site shall not count toward meeting the mitigation obligation of the project. The Landscape Architect/designer for the project shall design these Design: Prior to the Applicant, Landscape Review of plans replacement trees into the Specific Plan site to replace the habitat issuance of the first Architect, Biologist, of removed woodlands. The habitat shall be reviewed by a qualified grading permit Community Development biologist and must be comparable to the removed woodland. Director Planting specification shall be considered the following: Monitoring: Five years Applicant, Biologist, Ongoing observation and a) Newly planted trees shall be planted above grade and Community Development Director reporting maintained for five years, including irrigation, weed control, herbivore protection, and replacement. C: \Documents and Settings \DanaP \My Documents\North Park Village EIR \Draft MMP Table- 030305[1].docC: \Documents and Settings\DanaP\My Documents \North Park Village EIR \Draft MMP Table- 030305[1].doc 24 Mitigation C 0 0 N North Park Specific Plan No. 2001 -01 Revised Draft Mitigation Monitoring Program TABLE 1 (continued) NORTH PARK SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 2001 -01 MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM EIR Section /Mitigation Program Timing of Mitigation Responsible Party(ies) Monitoring Action b) Amending the backfill soil with wood shavings, oak leaf - molded, etc. is not recommended when existing soil is high in natural organic matter with a sandy loam texture, unless recommended by the project biologist. c) Recommendations for the need of planting amendments and drainage systems shall be based on'soil tests of this project and approved by the City. d) Any City approved work within the driplines of saved trees including branch removal, shall be under the inspection of a qualified biologist. e) Landscaping requiring irrigation shall not be planted within dripline of oaks due to the susceptibility of native oaks to root rot caused by excessive unseasonable irrigation. The design and installation of irrigation systems outside the dripline of the oaks shall be such that the area within the dripline is not wetted during operation of the system. In addition, surface runoff from impermeable surfaces shall be directed away from oaks; where natural topography has been altered, provisions should be made for drainage away from trunks of oaks so that water shall not pond or collect within the dripline of any oak. 5. A spring survey shall be conducted and completed prior to the Survey: During the Applicant, Botanist Receipt of survey report issuance of the first grading permit. The special status plant spring prior to issuance species surveys shall follow the guidelines developed by the of first grading permit California Native Plant Society (CNPS) (Tibor, 2001). These surveys, as outlined by the guidelines, shall be conducted during the appropriate time of year for each species determined by a qualified botanist. If any special status plant species is located its rarity and abundance shall be evaluated and the appropriate mitigation shall be implemented. The following mitigation strategy shall be used in the evaluation. The special status plant mitigation strategy is based on the following Mitigation Applicant, Botanist, As set forth in mitigation guidelines: Implementation: As set Community Development measure • Avoiding the impact to the species to the extent possible forth in mitigation measure Director, USFWS, and CDFG through project planning. • Minimizing impacts • Rectifying the impact by repairing, rehabilitating, or restoring the impacted environment CADocuments and Settings \DanaP \My Documents \North Park Village EIR \Draft MMP Table- 03030511].docCADocuments and Settings \DanaP \My Documents \North Park Village EIR\Draft MMP Table- 030305111.doc -25 Mitigation North Park Specific Plan No. 2001 -01 Revised Draft Mitigation Monitoring Program TABLE 1 (continued) NORTH PARK SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 2001-01 MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM EIR Section /Mitigation Program Timing of Mitigation Responsible Party(ies) Monitoring Action • Reducing or eliminating the impact over time by preservation and maintenance operations during the life of the project • Compensating for the impacts by replacing or providing substitute resources or environments If avoidance is not possible then consultation with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service shall be required for federally - listed species and consultation with California Department of Fish and Game for state - listed species shall be required. A special status plant mitigation monitoring program shall be developed following focused surveys and submitted to the appropriate agencies for review. 6. A focused series of surveys shall be conducted by a permitted Surveys: Prior to Applicant, Permitted Receipt of Survey Reports biologist for the western spadefoot toad prior to the issuance of the issuance of first grading Biologist, Community first grading permit and during the breeding species for this species permit and during the Development Director (February through May). The survey results shall be submitted breeding season for this within 45 days after completion of the last survey to the California species (February Department of Fish and Game for concurrence. If it is determined through May) that the western spadefoot is not present, no further mitigation is necessary. If the western spadefoot is located, then a relocation Relocation Program: Applicant, Qualified As stated in relocation program shall be developed. The relocation programs shall include Completed prior to the Biologist, Community program a detailed methodology for locating, capturing, and relocating of the issuance of the first Development Director and western spadefoot prior to capture. The relocation program grading permit California Department of required a biologist with the necessary permits for handling the Fish and Game western spadefoot. The program and the biologist(s) implementing the program shall be subject to approval of the CDFG. The relocation program shall be completed prior to the issuance of the first grading permit. 7. The focused surveys of the coastal California gnatcatcher found Prior to issuance of the Applicant, Biologist, U.S. Determination of need for one pair in the Buildout area of the project. As a result, consultation grading permits for the Fish and Wildlife Service, permit, further action as stated with the U.S Fish and Wildlife Service shall occur in order to obtain access road and and Community in permit (if applicable) a take permit prior to any project activities that may result in impacts interchange Development Director on the coastal California gnatcatcher. The permitting can occur through either Section 7 or 10 of the Federal Endangered Species Act depending on the presence or absence of a federal nexus. The permitting process would require the preparation of a Biological Assessment, which would include a mitigation plan to avoid or minimize impacts on this species. This mitigation may include avoiding the habitat of the coastal California gnatcatcher, construction limited to non - breeding season, noise restrictions on construction, or purchase of offsite habitat for this species, in addition to the preserved coastal sage scrub in the Nature Preserve. C.\Documents and Settings \DanaP \My Documents \North Park Village EIR\Draft MMP Table- 030305[l] .docCADocuments and Settings \DanaP \My Documents \North Park Village EIR \Draft MMP Table- 030305[1].doc 26 Mitigation C 8 W North Park Specific Plan No. 2001 -01 Revised Draft Mitigation Monitoring Program TABLE 1 (continued) NORTH PARK SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 2001 -01 MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM EIR Section /Mitigation Program Timing of Mitigation Responsible Party(ies) Monitoring Action 8. At least one focused survey shall be conducted for the burrowing Prior to the issuance of Applicant, Biologist, Review of survey and owl prior to the issuance of a grading permit and during the each a- grading permit California Department of mitigation program (if breeding season for this species (March through August). The and during the breeding Fish and Game,'and applicable), further action as survey results shall be submitted 45 days after completion of the season for this species Community Development stated in mitigation program (if last survey to the California Department of Fish and Game (CDFG) (March through August). Director applicable) for concurrence. If it is determined that the burrowing owl is not present, no further mitigation is necessary. If the burrowing owl is located on the development area, a mitigation program shall be developed. If an active burrow is present, the active site shall be protected until nesting activity has ended in compliance with Section 3503.5 of the California Fish and Game Code. Nesting activity for raptors in the project region normally occurs from February 1 to June 30. To protect active burrows the following restrictions on construction are required between February 1 and June 30 (unless burrows are no longer active as determined by a qualified biologist). Any active burrows found during survey efforts shall be mapped on the construction plans a. Clearing limits will be established a minimum of 100 feet in any direction from any active burrow. b. Access and surveying will not be allowed within 50 feet of any active burrow. Construction during the non - nesting season can occur only if a qualified biologist has determined that the burrows are no longer active. If an active burrow is observed during the non - nesting season, the burrow shall be monitored by a qualified biologist, and the biologist will evacuate the burrows in a manner consistent with any applicable state or federal laws or regulations and using CDFG - approved burrow closure procedures. The mitigation program shall include measures to assure nesting success if the survey(s) determines a breeding pair is present. Prior to implementation of the mitigation program, the program and the biologist implementing the program shall be subject to approval of the CDFG. 9. The project has the potential to impact nesting raptors, including the No earlier than 45 days Applicant, Biologist, Review of survey, further white - tailed kite, northern harrier, Cooper's hawk, golden eagle, and no later than 20 Community Development action if necessary and as set long -eared owl, and burrowing owl, as well as other common raptor days prior to Director, City Engineer; forth in mitigation measure species, should they nest within the Specific Plan development construction or CDFG area. grading /site preparation No earlier than 45 day and no later than 20 days prior to activities that would occur during the construction or grading /site preparation activities that would occur nesting /breeding during the nesting /breeding season of native raptor species C: \Documents and Settings \DanaP \My Documents \North Park Village EIR \Draft MMP Table - 030305[7]. docC: \Documents and Settings \DanaP \My Documents\North Park Village EIR \Draft MMP Table- 030305]1].doc 27 Mitigation 8 W 0 North Park Specific Plan No. 2001 -01 Revised Draft Mitigation Monitoring Program TABLE 1 (continued) NORTH PARK SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 2001 -01 MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM EIR Section /Mitigation Program Timing of Mitigation Responsible Party(ies) Monitoring Action potentially nesting on the site (typically February through August), season of native bird the applicant shall have a survey conducted by a qualified biologist species potentially approved by the Community Developmeni Director to determine if nesting on the site active raptor nests are present in the construction zone or within (typically February 200 feet of the construction zone. A report of this field survey shall through August) be submitted the Community Development Director. Construction can proceed if no raptor nests are located during this survey. If an Raptor Survey Report: active nest is found during the survey, a 500 -foot (this distance may Within 30 days of vary depending on the raptor species and construction activity, as survey determined by the biologist) fence barrier (subject to the review and approval of the Community Development Director) shall be erected Monitoring Report: around the nest site and clearing and construction within the fenced Within 30 days of area shall be postponed or halted, at the discretion of the biological completion of monitor, until the nest is vacated and juveniles have fledged and are monitoring independent of the nest, as determined by the biologist, and there is no evidence of a second attempt at nesting. The biologist shall serve as a construction monitor during those periods when construction activities shall occur near active nest areas to ensure that no inadvertent impacts on these nests shall occur. Results of the raptor survey and any subsequent monitoring shall be provided to the California Department of Fish and Game and any other appropriate agency. 10. Individuals using the Nature Preserve for passive recreation would Prior to issuance of first Applicant, Biologist, Acceptance of Review-ef result in the disturbance of natural open space areas adjacent to the grading permit Community Development management plan: development area. An appropriate plan for the management of the Director; designated compliance with management Nature Preserve shall be submitted to the City of Moorpark. The Conservation Organization plan would be the management plan shall include access points including parking and responsibility of the restrooms, signage for trails and restricted uses, appropriate Conservation Organization fencing, and restrictions on domestic animals. This plan shall be written by a qualified biologist prior to issuance of the first grading permit 3.7 Geology and Soils Project Design Features • The earth -fill dams that impound the existing onsite reservoirs will During grading Applicant, City Engineer, Site inspection be removed. Community Development Director Standard Conditions and Requirements • The proposed development, including the recreational lake, shall be Prior to issuance of Applicant, City Engineer, Review of plans designed in compliance with the Uniform Building Code (UBC), grading permits Community Development accepted industry standards, and the City's earthquake safety Director Municipal Code requirements in Chapter 15.32. CADocuments and Settings \DanaP \My Documents \North Park Village EIR \Draft MMP Table- 030305[1].docCADocuments and Settings \DanaP \My Documents \North Park Village EIR \Draft MMP Table- 030305[1].doc 28 Mitigation 0 'O W North Park Specific Plan No. 2001 -01 Revised Draft Mitigation Monitoring Program TABLE 1 (continued) NORTH PARK SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 2001 -01 MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM EIR Section /Mitigation Program Timing of Mitigation Responsible Party(ies) Monitoring Action • Abandoned water and oil wells (if encountered) shall be abandoned Abandonment: Prior to Applicant, California Site inspection following the guidelines established by the California Department of issuance of grading Department of Conservation, Conservation, Division of Oil and Gas and City Municipal Code permits Division of Oil, Gas and requirements in Chapter 8.40 for water wells. The lead agency Geothermal Resources, City associated with the potential abandonment of oil and injection wells Engineer is the California Department of Conservation, Division of Oil, Gas and Geothermal Resources ( DOGGR). Existing inactive oil wells located within proposed development areas, if encountered during grading, may require re-abandonment in accordance with the current DOGGR regulations. Potential water wells encountered during grading shall be Water Wells: During Applicant, City Engineer, Observation of grading abandoned in accordance with the guidelines of the Ventura County grading Ventura County Public activities Public Works Agency, Water Resources Department. If Works Agency, Water underground storage tanks are encountered during grading, they Resources Department, shall be abandoned in accordance with the guidelines of the Ventura County Resource Ventura County Resource Management Agency, Environmental Management Agency, Health Division. The abandonment of wells and disposal of Environmental Health underground storage tanks shall be observed by an environmental Division consultant in conjunction with the pertinent regulatory agencies. Additional site assessments, soil sampling and laboratory testing, See Section 3.11, See Section 3.11, Public See Section 3.11, Public Health and Safety Mitigation and analyses may be required if potential contaminated soils are Public Health and Health and Safes Mitigation encountered during grading due to the presence of underground Safety Mitigation Program Program facilities, buried debris, stained soils, waste drums, tanks, or Program odorous soils. • Prior to issuance of a grading permit for any development on the Plan: Prior to issuance Applicant, City Engineer Review of plan Specific Plan site, the project applicant shall submit an erosion of grading permits. control plan to the City Engineer for review and approval. The erosion control plan shall include measures to reduce the amount of onsite and offsite erosion during construction of the proposed project, proper care of drainage control devices, proper irrigation, rodent control, and landscaping. To supplement the erosion control Implementation: Within Applicant, City Engineer Site inspection plan, hydroseeding of affected graded slopes shall be performed by 30 days of grading of the project applicant within 30 days of grading of the slope area. the slope area. • The design and construction of the lake shall comply with current Prior to issuance of a Applicant, City Engineer Review of plans and dam safety design standards as set forth by the State of California grading permit specifications Department of Water Resources, Division of Safety of Dams (DSOD) requirements, to reduce the hazard of seiche and potential inundation of downstream areas in the event of dam failure. To the extent required by law, the detention basin structures shall also comply with the DSOD requirements for their design and construction. C'. \Documents and Settings \DanaP \My Documents\North Park Village EIR \Draft MMP Table- 030305[11.docC: \Documents and Settings \DanaP \My Documents \North Park Village EIR \Draft MMP Table- 030305[1].doc 25 Mitigation C 8 N North Park Specific Plan No. 2001 -01 Revised Draft Mitigation Monitoring Program TABLE 1 (continued) NORTH PARK SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 2001 -01 MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM EIR Section /Mitigation Program Timing of Mitigation Responsible Party(lies) Monitoring Action Mitigation Measures 1. Complete removal and recompaction of the alluvial deposits to During grading activities Applicant, City Engineer Site inspection geotechnically competent materials shall be performed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer in areas proposed for development if fill is to be placed on top of these sediments. Additional compressible materials that will probably require removal include topsoil, colluvium infilling swales and landslide grabens, surficial slumps, debris flows, landslide debris, and uncontrolled fills. 2. The small landslides in the southern and central portions of the Prior to issuance of a Applicant, Engineering Review of report, additional Specific Plan site where development is proposed shall be grading permit Geologist, Geotechnical monitoring as noted in report evaluated further prior to grading for parcel /tract maps by an Engineer, City Engineer engineering geologist and a geotechnical engineer to determine their lateral extent, depth, and potential instability from grading. If these areas are to be buried under the proposed fills, partial to complete removal of the landslides during grading as recommended by the reviewing engineer will be necessary to mitigate the effects of settlement due to fill loads. The grading plan shall be subject to the approval of the City Engineer. 3. During the review of tentative tract maps and discretionary permits, During the review of Applicant, Engineering Review and acceptance of faults mapped within the development area of the Specific Plan site tentative tract maps and Geologist, City Engineer geologic report; site inspection shall be examined in the field by a geologic engineer to verify their discretionary permits location and recency of movement. Exploratory work shall be conducted to locate and define the activity status of the northeast to northwest- trending faults that have been mapped within the area proposed for development. If an active fault is encountered, structural setbacks away from the active fault shall be prescribed by a certified engineering geologist. 4. Areas of loose, cohesionless soils (i.e., unconsolidated alluvial During grading activities Applicant, Geologist, Site inspection deposits, colluvium, topsoil, and debris flow deposits) that may be Geotechnical Engineer, City susceptible to seismic ground shaking, fault- induced ground Engineer rupture, liquefaction, landslides, or settlement shall be completely removed and replaced with compacted fill during all grading activities for tract maps and discretionary permits. This work shall be based on investigation by a geologist and approved by the City Engineer. Areas underlain with artificial fill, especially where placed as part of the oil field activities or in the reservoirs, shall also be removed and recompacted during grading. Subdrains shall be placed according to a soils engineer's recommendations along canyon bottoms. A geotechnical engineer shall evaluate areas of sandy alluvial soils within the proposed development area that will not be removed during grading for potential liquefaction and provide CADocuments and Settings\DanaP \My Documents \North Park Village EIR \Draft MMP Table- 030305[1].docCADocuments and Settings\DanaMMy Documents \North Park Village EIR \Draft MMP Table- 030305[1].doc 30 Mitigation North Park Specific Plan No. 2001 -01 Revised Draft Mitigation Monitoring Program TABLE 1 (continued) NORTH PARK SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 2001 -01 MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM EIR Section /Mitigation Program Timing of Mitigation Responsible Party(ies) Monitoring Action site - specific measures. 5. Prior to the issuance of grading permits for individual tracts or Prior to the issuance of Applicant, Geologist, Review and acceptance of parcels, additional detailed geotechnical investigations and slope grading permits for Geotechnical Engineer, City geologic reports stability analyses shall be performed for the slopes impacted by individual tracts or Engineer seismically- induced landslides, and site - specific measures parcels implemented, as necessary. This shall include transitional landslide areas in the north - central portion of the Specific Plan site. Mitigation alternatives for unstable slopes include the construction of earthen buttresses, re- grading of the slopes to less steep gradients, or delineation of structural setbacks. If some of the landslides that encroach onto the northerly portion of the proposed development are left in place without stabilization, a review of their stability under seismically loading shall be conducted and remediated. 6. Concurrent with the submittal of all tentative tract maps, the project Concurrent with the Applicant, City Engineer, Review and acceptance of applicant shall submit a detailed geologic and soils engineering submittal of all tentative Community Development reports Director report meeting the requirements of the City of Moorpark Subdivision tract maps Ordinance. If the detailed investigation confirms the existence of Monitoring of additional geologic hazards, the City Engineer shall require use limitations or conditions noted on ail special earthquake resistant design features as appropriate. Other aradina, b LO ina. and specific recommendations included in the report shall be impovement plans and incorporated into the grading, building, and improvement plans and 2ermits per lan,guaoe in permits for each discretionary permit required by the City of conditions Moorpark. 7. Development areas shall be stripped of vegetation and debris prior Prior to the start of Applicant, City Engineer Site inspection to the start of grading. Irrigation lines and abandoned underground grading storage tanks (if encountered), and water and oil wells shall be removed and disposed off the site. Any sump deposits encountered Prior to placement of Applicant, City Engineer Site inspection on the site shall be identified and remediated as necessary. Prior to compacted fill, all placement of compacted fill, all compressible materials shall be compressible materials removed. The grading plan shall be approved by the City Engineer. shall be removed 8. Construction of onsite structures shall begin only after settlement of Prior to issuance of Applicant, Geotechnical Review and acceptance of fill materials in deep canyon areas has been stabilized. In order to building permits Engineer, City Engineer reports determine when settlement is complete, laboratory testing and analysis by a geotechnical engineer shall be performed for as- graded conditions on all tracts /parcels in areas over large canyon fills. An alternative would be the installation of a settlement monitoring system. Determination of where testing is required and findings of the stability analysis shall be approved by the City Engineer prior to construction. C: \Documents and Settings \DanaP \My Documents\North Park Village EIR\Draft MMP Table- 03030511j.docC: \Documents and Settings \DanaP \My Documents \North Park Village EIR \Draft MMP Table- 030305[1).doc 31 Mitigation W 0 0 '0 W 411, North Park Specific Plan No. 2001 -01 Revised Draft Mitigation Monitoring Program TABLE 1 (continued) NORTH PARK SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 2001 -01 MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM EIR Section /Mitigation Program Timing of Mitigation Responsible Party(ies) Monitoring Action 9. A determination of soil expansivity and development of appropriate Prior to issuance of Applicant, Geotechnical Review and acceptance of remedial measures shall be performed by a geotechnical engineer grading permits and Engineer, City Engineer reports, site inspection prior to site development. This evaluation shall be performed during during grading the subsurface geotechnical investigations. If expansive clay is encountered at shallow depths, clay -rich soils shall be removed and replaced with a specified thickness of non - expansive granular soil beneath the structures, concrete slabs, and footings, as necessary. During grading of localized expansive soils mixing with the more common, granular non - expansive soils present onsite should be sufficient to mitigate this impact. Alternatively, mitigation of expansive soils can be accomplished during construction by pre - saturation of the expansive materials and /or reinforcement of the building foundations and slabs. 10. Prior to the issuance of the first grading permit, the applicant shall Prior to issuance of first Applicant, Geotechnical Review and acceptance of conduct a visual inspection, with photographs, of the existing grading permit Engineer, City Engineer visual inspection report, site residences located along the south - southwestern perimeter of the inspection Specific Plan site and shall establish surface survey monuments in the existing fill areas adjacent to these residences prior to grading of the Specific Plan site. This information will establish a baseline of the existing conditions of these residences prior to grading in order to compare home conditions at the completion of grading. 11. Debris and /or retention basins shall be designed by the project Prior to issuance of Applicant, Project Engineer, Review and acceptance of applicant's engineer to mitigate any debris flows that may emulate grading permits, during City Engineer, Community plans, site inspection, from the undeveloped portions of the site. The project engineer grading, and annual Development Director, corrective actions will be taken for any non - performing erosion control devices shall perform regular field checks of the debris and retention basins during the entire construction period and until the slopes and check of erosion control devices Ventura County Watershed Protection District graded areas have been revegetated to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and Community Development Director. Following the first season storm after construction of backbone infrastructure, the project engineer shall field check erosion control devices to confirm that they are performing as designed. All subsequent annual field checks shall be performed by the pertinent agency (e.g., Ventura County Flood Control, Maintenance District). 12. Prior to the issuance of each grading permit, debris flows and Prior to the issuance of Applicant, Project Engineer, Review and acceptance of surficial slumping shall be evaluated and permits conditioned so each grading permit City Engineer, Community reports, site inspection that surficial landslide and debris flow deposits are either removed Development Director corrective actions will be taken for any non - performing during mass grading or contained with an adequately -sized retaining device, such as a debris basin, during construction of retaining devices infrastructure. Additional evaluation to determine the locations and potential debris flow volumes should be performed during the design phase of the proposed debris basins. C'. \Documents and Settings \DanaP \My Documents \North Park Village EIR \Draft MMP Table- 030305[11.docC1Documents and Settings \DanaP \My Documents \North Park Village EIR \Draft MMP Table- 030305[1].doc 32 Mitigation 0 8 'o /Wry VI North Park Specific Plan No. 2001 -01 Revised Draft Mitigation Monitoring Program TABLE 1 (continued) NORTH PARK SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 2001 -01 MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM EIR Section /Mitigation Program Timing of Mitigation Responsible Party(ies) Monitoring Action 13. To mitigate potential large landslides in the north- central portion Prior to issuance of Applicant, Geotechnical Review and acceptance of near the helispot, observatory, and northernmost water tanks, the gffading permits in Engineer, City Engineer, plans, site inspection following mitigation measures shall be implemented: landslide areas first Community Development a. For the natural and proposed slopes on the southeast side of _grading permit Director, Ventura County the landslide area, slope trimming and /or construction of soldier Fire Protection District, piles is required. Ventura County Waterworks District No. 1 b. For the natural slope adjacent to the northwest of the proposed water tank site (head scarp area of the existing landslide complex), construction of soldier piles extending below the potential failure surfaces and /or construction of shear /buttress keys and fills in the upper portion (head scarp area) of the existing landslide complex is required. Or c. Alternately, the helipad, observatory, and water tanks shall be shifted to the south, away from the existing landslide, along the existing ridgelines for approximately 50 to 100 feet. 14. To ensure low permeability of the lake lining, special handling (i.e., PF60F W Applicant, Project Geologist, Review of handling of lake - special stockpiling and mixing procedures) of the Saugus Formation grading perms City Engineer lining material bedrock mined for the lining shall be required. Further laboratory During excavation testing of the stockpiled materials shall also be required to confirm the suitability of these soils prior to their placement. Additionally, the soils derived from this bed shall be mixed with soils having a higher percentage of particles two microns in size, as determined by the project geologist. 3.8 Hydrology and Water Quality Project Design Features • As a part of the Phase A and buildout projects, the project design Prior to issuance of a Applicant, City Engineer Review of plans, site incorporates onsite debris and retention basins. grading permit inspection Standard Conditions and Requirements • During grading, the following requirements shall apply: During grading Applicant, City Engineer Site inspection a. Grading may occur during the rainy season from October 15th to April 15th subject to approval by the City Engineer and installation of erosion control facilities. Erosion control measures shall be in place and functional between October 15th and April 15th. In order to comply with the October 15 date, revised erosion control plans shall be submitted to the City Engineer, no later than September 15th of each year from the start of grading or clearing operations to the time of grading bond release. Q \Documents and Settings\DanaP\My Documents \North Park Village EIR\Draft MMP Table- 030305]1].docC ADocuments and Settings \DanaP \My Documents\North Park Village EIR\Draft MMP Table - 030305[1]. doc 33 Mitigation C 8 0 ca North Park Specific Plan No. 2001 -01 Revised Draft Mitigation Monitoring Program TABLE 1 (continued) NORTH PARK SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 2001 -01 MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM EIR Section /Mitigation Program Timing of Mitigation Responsible Party(ies) Monitoring Action b. Temporary irrigation, hydroseeding and erosion control measures shall be implemented on all temporary grading. Temporary grading is defined to be any grading partially completed and any disturbance of existing natural conditions due to construction activity. These measures will apply to temporary grading activity that remains or is anticipated to remain unfinished or undisturbed in its altered condition for a period of time greater than 30 days or the beginning of the rainy season whichever comes first. Mitigation Measures 1. The applicant shall be responsible for the preparation of a Prior to issuance of the Applicant, City Engineer, Review and acceptance of comprehensive Master Plan of Drainage for the North Park Specific first grading permit Ventura County Watershed Master Plan of Drainage Plan site in conjunction with the Ventura County Watershed Protection District Protection District adopted Master Drainage Plan. The Master Plan shall address: hydrology, detention basin design, storm water Best Management Practices (BMPs), and stream stability associated with the Phase A and buildout projects. The Master Plan shall be submitted to the City of Moorpark and the County of Ventura for approval prior to the issuance of the first grading permit. 2. The applicant shall be responsible for the preparation of a Runoff Prior to issuance of the Applicant, City Engineer, Review and acceptance of Management Plan (RMP) to be approved by the City of Moorpark first grading permit Ventura County Watershed Runoff Management Plan City Engineer prior to the issuance of the first grading permit. The Protection District Ventura County Watershed Protection District adopted Master Drainage Plan and the Ventura County Watershed Protection Design and Hydrology Manuals shall be used as the basis for the RMP. At a minimum, the RMP shall include the following information: a. Time of Concentration Calculations for each storm event for existing and buildout conditions. b. For buildout conditions, a master plan of "back bone" storm drain facilities routing shall be included in the rational method calculations. c. Impervious ratios for onsite development shall correspond to the Calleguas Creek Master Hydrology Study. d. Rational method runs for all storm events using the VCRAT program. e. Detailed calculations for flow -by and flow- through retention and detention basins. C Tocuments and Settings \DanaP \My Documents \North Park Village EIR\Draft MMP Table- 030305[l] .docC Documents and Settings\DanaP \My Documents \North Park Village EIR\Draft MMP Table- 030305[li.doc 34 Mitigation 8 0 W North Park Specific Plan No. 2001 -01 Revised Draft Mitigation Monitoring Program TABLE 1 (continued) NORTH PARK SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 2001 -01 MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM EIR Section /Mitigation Program Timing of Mitigation Responsible Party(ies) Monitoring Action f. Determination of State Division of Safety of Dams jurisdictional criteria and documentation on which basins fall within State Division of Safety of Dams jurisdiction. g. Channel stability and sediment transport analysis for any natural areas adjacent to development. This analysis shall include the natural drainage downstream of all discharge points. In areas, where the stability analysis indicates that channel degradation is likely, channel stabilization or other City approved measure shall be implemented. 3. During site preparation and construction, the contractor shall During site preparation, Applicant, City Engineer,. Site inspection minimize disturbance of natural groundcover on the project site until grading, and NPDES superintendent such activity is required for grading and construction purposes. construction During grading operations, the developer shall employ a full -time superintendent for National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System ( NPDES) compliance. If determined necessary by the City Engineer, the NPDES superintendent shall be present on the project site Monday through Friday and on all other days when the probability of rain is 40 percent or higher and prior to the start of and during all grading or clearing operations until the release of grading bonds. The NPDES superintendent shall have full authority to hire personnel, bind the developer in contracts, rent equipment, and purchase materials to the extent needed to effectuate Best Management practices. The NPDES superintendent shall provide proof to the City Engineer of attendance and satisfactory completion of courses satisfactory to the City Engineer totaling no less than 8 hours directed specifically to NPDES compliance and effective use of Best Management Practices. Proof of such attendance and completion shall be provided to the City Engineer prior to employment of the NPDES superintendent. 4. Prior to issuance of the initial grading permit, the applicant shall Prior to issuance of first Applicant, Community Review and acceptance of have prepared a Storm Water Quality Urban Impact Mitigation Plan grading permit Development Director, City plans, site inspection, - other (SQUIMP) and include Non - Structural, Source Control, and Engineer, Certified Erosion monitorina actions as Structural Best Management Practices (BMPs). A Certified Erosion and Sediment Control _s _p<_cifirci in the S 0 U I M P and Sediment Control Professional or qualified Civil Engineer shall professional or qualified Civil Engineer prepare the SQUIMP. The SQUIMP shall be reviewed and approved by the Moorpark Community Development Director and City Engineer. The development of the SQUIMP shall conform to the Ventura County National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System permit, the SQUIMP standards, and the Technical Guidance Manual for Storm Water Quality Control Measures. The following are the minimum required mitigation from the Technical C'. \Documents and Settings\DanaP\My Documents \North Park Village EIR\Draft MMP Table- 030305[1).docC. \Documents and Settings\DanaP \My Documents \North Park Village EIR \Draft MMP Table- 030305[1).doc 35 Mitigation 0 C MW W North Park Specific Plan No. 2001 -01 Revised Draft Mitigation Monitoring Program TABLE 1 (continued) NORTH PARK SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 2001 -01 MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM EIR Section /Mitigation Program Timing of Mitigation Responsible Party(ies) Monitoring Action Guidance Manual for Storm Water Quality Control Measures. General Site Design: G -1 Conserve Natural Areas. This measure involves locating development on the least sensitive portion of a site and conserving naturally vegetated areas. This measure can minimize environmental impacts in general and storm water runoff impacts in particular. The design of the North Park Specific Plan currently incorporates some of these planning measures. G -2 Protect Slopes and Channels. If not properly protected and stabilized, erosion of slopes and channels can be major sources of sediment and associated pollutants, such as nutrients. Channel stability and erosion control measures shall be analyzed and discussed the Master Plan of Drainage (see Mitigation Measure 1). G -3 Control Peak Storm Water Runoff Discharge Rates. Unless controlled, peak storm water runoff rates from developed areas are typically higher than those from previously undeveloped areas. Higher peak flows can change stream morphology and increase downstream erosion that can damage stream habitat, impact aesthetic values, and convey larger pollutant loads to receiving waters. Therefore, the project must mitigate the post - development discharge rates to less than the existing storm event peak flow rates. G4 Minimize Impervious Area. Suggested strategies for minimizing imperviousness through site design include: reduce footprints of buildings and parking lots, cluster buildings and paved areas, use minimum allowable roadway and sidewalk sections and parking stall widths, include landscape islands in cul -de -sacs, use pervious pavement materials, provide grassy bioswale area that meet NPDES requirements within the downstream portions of the lot areas protected and maintained by Homeowner Associations, and use grass -lined channels or surface swales to convey runoff instead of paved gutters. Such measures shall be included in the SQUIMP portion of the Master Plan of Drainage. G -5 Minimize Effective Imperviousness. This approach involves routing runoff from impervious areas over grassy areas or other pervious areas prior to discharge to the storm drainage CiDocuments and Settings \DanaP \My Documents \North Park Village EIR \Draft MMP Table- 030305[l] .docCADocuments and Settings \DanaP \My DocumentMorth Park Village EIR \Draft MMP Table- 030305[l].doc 36 Mitigation C 8 I� W North Park Specific Plan No. 2001 -01 Revised Draft Mitigation Monitoring Program TABLE 1 (continued) NORTH PARK SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 2001 -01 MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM EIR Section /Mitigation Program Timing of Mitigation Responsible Party(les) Monitoring Action system or receiving water to reduce peak flows, reduce total runoff volume and provide some degree of pollutant removal. Three methods for minimizing effective imperviousness include turf buffers, grassy bioswale areas that meet NPDES requirements within the downstream portions of the lot areas that are protected and maintained by a Homeowners Association, and grass -lined channels. This approach shall be addressed in the SQUIMP portion of the Drainage Master Plan. Site - Specific Source The SQUIMP portion of the Drainage Master Plan shall address: S -1 Storm Drain Message and Signage. The appropriate locations for the signage regarding discharge prohibitions at storm drain inlets and a standard message to be used throughout the Specific Plan site. S -2 Outdoor Material Storage Area Design. General design criteria for outdoor material storage area design. S -3 Outdoor Trash Storage and Waste Handling Area Design. General design criteria for outdoor trash storage and waste handling area design. S -4 Outdoor Loading /Unloading Dock Area Design. General design criteria for outdoor loading /unloading dock area design. S -5 Outdoor Repair /Maintenance Bay Design. General design criteria for outdoor repair and maintenance bay design. S -6 Outdoor Vehicle /Equipment/Accessory Washing Area Design. General design criteria for outdoor vehicle, equipment, and accessory washing area design. S -7 Fueling Area Design. General design criteria for fueling area design. S -8 Proof of Control Measure Maintenance. To ensure that maintenance is provided, the County of Ventura Watershed Protection District may require a Maintenance Agreement and a Maintenance Plan from the owner /operator of the storm water control measures. The SQUIMP shall identify the party(ies) responsible for maintenance of control measures. C'. \Documents and Settings\DanaP \My Documents \North Park Village EIR \Draft MMP Table- 030305[i].docCADocuments and Settings \DanaP \My Documents \North Park Village EIR \Draft MMP Table- 030305[11.doc 37 Mitigation C C O O North Park Specific Plan No. 2001 -01 Revised Draft Mitiaation Monitorina Proaram TABLE 1 (continued) NORTH PARK SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 2001 -01 MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM EIR Section /Mitigation Program Timing of Mitigation Responsible Party(ies) Monitoring Action Structural/Treatment BMPs The SQUIMP shall include structural and /or treatment BMPs. The structural BMPs shall focus on meeting potential TMDL and pollutant standards for residential developments. The treatment BMPs shall conform to the Technical Guidance Manual for Storm Water Control Measures. The SQUIMP guidelines contained in the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Permit and Waste Discharge Requirements for Ventura County state that Structural BMPs are required for all new developments. The structural BMPs shall be sized to comply with one of the following numeric sizing criteria, unless an alternative is considered by the permittees to provide equivalent or better treatment. Ground water quality must be evaluated based on the amount of water and the potential pollutants that may be introduced associated with the buildout of the Specific Plan site. Volume -based BMPs shall be designed to infiltrate or treat either: a. The volume of annual runoff based on unit basin storage water quality volume, to achieve 80 percent or more volume treatment by the method recommended in the California Storm Water Best Management Practices Handbook — Industrial/ Commercial (1993), the Ventura Countywide Storm Water Quality Management Program Land Development Guidelines, or; b. The 85th percentile 24 -hour runoff event determined as the maximized capture storm water volume for the area, from the formula recommended in Urban Runoff Quality Management, WEF Manual of Practice No. 231ASCE Manual of Practice No. 87 (1998); or; c. The volume of runoff produced for a 0.75 inch storm event, prior to its discharge to a storm water conveyance system, or; d. The volume of runoff produced from a historical- record based reference 24 -hour rainfall criterion for "treatment' that achieves approximately reduction in pollutant loads achieved by the 85th percentile 24 -hour runoff event. The volume of runoff produced from the 85th percentile 24 -hour storm event, as determined from the local historical rainfall record; C. \Documents and Settings \DanaP \My Documents\North Park Village EIR \Draft MMP Table - 030305[1]. docC. \Documents and Settings \DanaP\My Documents \North Park Village EIR \Draft MMP Table- 030305[l] .doc 38 Mitigation 0 North Park Specific Plan No. 2001 -01 Revised Draft Mitigation Monitoring Program TABLE 1 (continued) NORTH PARK SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 2001 -01 MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM EIR Section /Mitigation Program Timing of Mitigation Responsible Party(ies) Monitoring Action Or Flow -based BMPs shall be designed to infiltrate or treat either: a) 10 percent of the 50 -year design flow rate, or; b) A flow that will result in treatment of the same portion of runoff as treated using volumetric standards, or; c) A rain event equal to at least 0.2 inches per hour intensity, or d) A rain event equal to at least two times the 85th percentile hourly rainfall intensity for Ventura County The Technical Guidance Manual for Storm Water Quality Control Measures requires that treatment controls measures be used for any new development. The following is a partial list of treatment control measures that may be used by the applicant: T -1 Grass Strip Filter T -2 Grass Swale Filter T -3 Extended Detention Basin T-4 Wet Detention Basin T -5 Constructed Wetland T -6 Detention Basin /Sand Filter T -7 Porous Pavement Detention T -8 Porous Landscape Detention T -9 Infiltration Basin T -10 Infiltration Trench The following discussion identifies treatment control measures that are appropriate for use on the North Park Specific Plan site: T -1 & -2: Grass Strip and Swales. An appropriate treatment is either vegetative swales, enhanced vegetated swales utilizing check dams and wide depressions, a series of small detention facilities designed similarly to a dry detention basin, or a combination of these treatment C. \Documents and Settings \DanaP \My Documents\North Park Village EIR\Draft MMP Table- 030305[1].docC1Documents and Settings \DanaP \My Documents\North Park Village EIR \Draft MMP Table- 030305[l] .doc 39 Mitigation 0 Q F� N North Park Specific Plan No. 2001 -01 Revised Draft Mitigation Monitoring Program TABLE 1 (continued) NORTH PARK SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 2001 -01 MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM EIR Section /Mitigation Program Timing of Mitigation Responsible Party(ies) Monitoring Action methods into a treatment train (a series of Structural BMPs). It is essential that the SQUIMP address treatment for North Park to assure that the runoff from the site be treated to the "maximum extent practicable." In order for the vegetation swales to be effective in the removal of potential pollutants, the swales must be treated as water quality features and must be maintained differently than grass areas. Specifically, pesticides, herbicides, and fertilizers, which may be used on the grass areas, must not be used in the vegetation swales. T -3: Extended Detention Basins (T -3). Construction of extended detention basins within the proposed retention basin is likely the most efficient way of treating storm water runoff from North Park. The purpose of the extended detention basin is to aid in the removal mechanism: settling or sedimentation; adsorption to sediments, vegetation, or detritus; filtration by plants; microbial uptake and /or transformation; and uptake by wetland plants or algae. The removal of the urban runoff pollutants occurs during the slow draining of the basin (minimum 24 hours). Water Quality Basins are expected to reduce the following pollutants: total suspended solids, total phosphorous, total nitrogen, chemical oxygen demand (COD), total lead, total zinc, total copper, and bacteria. If other treatment controls are used, such as those discussed below, the treatment volumes for the extended detention basins can be reduced or eliminated. Several of the following treatment control measures could be used within the development in parks or single lots. T -9 & -10: Infiltration Trenches and Basins. Infiltration Trenches and /or Basins may be used onsite to meet potential future TMDLs for noxious aquatic plants and nutrients. Infiltration trenches and basins treat storm water runoff through filtration. A typical infiltration CADocuments and Settings\DanaMMy Documents \North Park Village EIR\Draft MMP Table- 030305[1].docCADocuments and Settings \DanaP \My Documents \North Park Village EIR\Draft MMP Table- 030305[l].doc 40 Mitigation North Park Specific Plan No. 2001 -01 Revised Draft Mitigation Monitoring Program TABLE 1 (continued) NORTH PARK SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 2001-01 MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM EIR Section /Mitigation Program Timing of Mitigation Responsible Party(ies) Monitoring Action trench is essentially an excavated trench, which is lined with filter fabric and backfilled with stones. Depth of the infiltration trench ranges from three to eight feet and functions best in areas with permeable soils, and water table and bedrock depth situated well below the bottom of the trench. Trenches should not be used to trap coarse sediments, because large sediment will likely clog the trench. Grass buffers can be installed to capture sediment before it enters the trench to minimize clogging. Infiltration basins are generally used for drainage areas between five to 50 acres. Infiltration basins can be either in -line or off - line, and may treat different volumes such as the water quality volume or the two -year or 10 -year storm. 5. Prior to the issuance of the first grading permit and as a part of the Prior to issuance of first Applicant, City Engineer, Review and acceptance of project's compliance with the National Pollutant Discharge grading permit Community Development SWPPPL-and ongoing Elimination System (NPDES) program, the applicant shall file a Director, Regional Water monitoring of grading and Notice of Intent (NOI) with the Los Angeles Regional Water Quality Quality Control Board construction for compliance Control Board providing notification and intent to comply with the with SWPPP State of California general permit. Prior to issuance of the first grading permit, a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan ( SWPPP) must be completed for onsite and associated offsite construction activities. A copy of the SWPPP must be available and implemented at the construction site at all times. The SWPPP outlines the source control and/or treatment control Best Management Practices (BMPs) that will avoid or mitigate runoff pollutants at the construction site to the "maximum extent practicable." A listing of these BMPs from the California Storm Water Best Management Practice Handbook - Construction Activity is provided below. &CA 1 Dewatering Operations. This operation requires the use of sediment controls to prevent or reduce the discharge of pollutant to storm water from dewatering operations. CA 2 Paving Operations. Prevent or reduce the runoff of pollutant from paving operations by proper storage of materials, protecting storm drain facilities during construction, and training employees. C C 0 CADocuments and Settings\DanaP \My Documents \North Park Village EIRTraft MMP T2b1e- 030305[1].docC10ocuments and Settings\DanaP \My Documents \North Park Village EIR \Draft MMP Table- 030305[1].doc 41 Mitigation IlA W North Park Specific Plan No. 2001 -01 Revised Draft Mitigation Monitoring Program TABLE 1 (continued) NORTH PARK SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 2001-01 MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM EIR Sect! on /Mitigation Program Timing of Mitigation Responsible Party(ies) Monitoring Action CA 3 Structural Construction and Painting. Keep site and area clean and orderly, use erosion control, use proper storage facilities, use safe products and train employees to prevent and reduce pollutant discharge to storm water facilities from construction and painting. CA 10 Material Delivery and Storage. Minimize the storage of hazardous materials on the site. If stored onsite, keep in designated areas, install secondary containment, conduct regular inspections, and train employees. CA 11 Material Use. Prevent and reduce the discharge of pesticides, herbicides, fertilizers, detergents, plaster, petroleum products and other hazardous materials from entering the storm water. CA 20 Solid Waste Management. This BMP describes the requirements to properly design and maintain trash storage areas. The primary design feature requires the storage of trash in covered areas. CA 21 Hazardous Waste Management. This BMP describes the requirements to properly design and maintain waste areas. CA 23 Concrete Waste Management. Prevent and reduce pollutant discharge to storm water from concrete waste by providing onsite and offsite washouts in designated areas and training employees and consultants regarding their use. CA 24 Sanitary Septic Water Management. Provide convenient, well- maintained facilities, and arrange regular service and disposal of sanitary waste. CA 30 Vehicle and Equipment Cleaning. Use offsite facilities or wash in designated areas to reduce pollutant discharge into the storm drain facilities. CA 31 Vehicle and Equipment Fueling. Use offsite facilities or designated onsite enclosed coverings to reduce pollutant discharge into the storm drain facilities. CA 32 Vehicle and Equipment Maintenance. Use offsite facilities or designated onsite enclosed areas with coverings to reduce pollutant discharge into the storm drain facilities. In addition, run a "dry site" to prevent pollution discharge into storm drains. C1Documents and Settings \DanaP \My Documents \North Park Village EIR\Draft MMP Table- 030305[1j.docCADocuments and Settings \DanaP \My Documents \North Park Village EIR \Draft MMP Table -030305[11.doc 42 Mitigation North Park Specific Plan No. 2001 -01 Revised Draft Mitigation Monitoring Program TABLE 1 (continued) NORTH PARK SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 2001 -01 MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM EIR Section /Mitigation Program Timing of Mitigation Responsible Party(ies) Monitoring Action CA 40 Employee and Subcontractor Training. Have training sessions for employees and subcontractors to understand the need for implementation and usage of BMPs and the need and purpose for keeping the site clean. ESC 2 Preservation of Existing Vegetation. Minimize the removal of existing trees and shrubs because they serve as erosion control. ESC 10 Seeding and Planting. Provide soil stability by planting and seeding grasses, trees, shrubs, vines, and ground cover. ESC 11 Mulching. Stabilize cleared or freshly seeded areas with mulch. ESC 20 Geotextiles and Mats. Natural or synthetics material can be used for soil stability. ESC Dust Control. Reduce wind erosion and dust generated by construction activities by using dust control measures. ESC 23 Construction Road Stabilization. All onsite vehicle transport routes should be stabilized immediately after grading and frequently maintained to prevent erosion and control dust. ESC 24 Stabilized Construction Entrance. Stabilize the construction entrance area to reduce amount of sediment tracked off the site. ESC 30 Earth Dikes. Construct earth dikes of compacted soil to divert runoff or channel water to a desired location. ESC 31 Temporary Drains and Swales. Use temporary drains and swales to divert offsite runoff around the construction site, stabilized areas, and direct it into sediment basins or traps. ESC 40 Outlet Protection. Use rock or grouted rock at outlet pipes to prevent scouring of soil caused by high velocities. ESC 41 Check Dams. Check dams reduce velocities of concentrated flows, thereby reducing erosion, and promoting sedimentation behind the dams. Check dams are small and placed across swales and drainage ditches. O C. \Documents and Settings \DanaP \My Documents \North Park Village EIR \Draft MMP Table- 03030511].docC. \Documents and Settings \DanaP \My Documents \North Park Village EIR \Draft MMP Table- 030305[1].doc 43 Mitigation F� r C 0 0 0 North Park Specific Plan No. 2001 -01 Revised Draft Mitigation Monitoring Program TABLE 1 (continued) NORTH PARK SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 2001 -01 MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM EIR Section /Mitigation Program Timing of Mitigation Responsible Party(ies) Monitoring Action ESC 50 Silt Fence. Composed of filter fabric, which have been entrenched, attached to support poles and sometimes backed by wire fence support. Silt fences promote sedimentation behind the fence of sediment -laden water. ESC 51 Straw Bale Barrier. Place straw bales end to end in a level contour in a shallow trench and stake them in place. The bales will detain runoff and promote sedimentation. ESC 52 Sand Bag Barriers. By stacking sand bags on a level contour, creates a barrier to detain sediment -laden water. The barrier will promote sedimentation. ESC 53 Brush or Rock Filter. Made of % -inch to three -inch diameter rocks place on a level contour or composed of brush wrapped in filter cloth and staked to the toe of the slope will provide a sediment trap. ESC 54 Storm Drain Inlet Protection. Devices that remove sediment from sediment laden storm water before entering the storm drain inlet or catch basin. ESC 55 Sediment Trap. A sediment trap is a small, excavated or bermed area where runoff for small drainage areas can pass through allowing sediment to settle out. 6. A combination of grass swales and centrifugal separators or Best Prior to issuance of a Applicant, City Engineer Review of calculations, review Management Practices of equivalent or superior effectiveness shall grading permit_�review and acceptance of plans, site be employed with the detention basins in the project design that of calculations) inspection: corrective actions demonstrate compliance with all applicable groundwater quality will be taken for any non - policies and regulations. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, Prior to acce tp ance of performing devices improvements calculations shall be provided to the satisfaction of the City Engineer to demonstrate project compliance. Devices shall be L±nspection of devices tested after installation and corrective actions shall be taken for and testing for performance non - performing devices. C'. \Documents and Settings \DanaP \My Documents \North Park Village EIR \Draft MMP Table- 030305[1).docC: \Documents and Settings\DanaP \My Documents \North Park Village EIR\Draft MMP Table- 03030511j.doc 44 Mitigation 0 O O ,O North Park Specific Plan No. 2001 -01 Revised Draft Mitigation Monitoring Program TABLE 1 (continued) NORTH PARK SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 2001 -01 MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM EIR Section /Mitigation Program Timing of Mitigation Responsible Party(ies) Monitoring Action 3.9 Cultural and Paleontological Resources Mitigation Measures 1. Prior to all earthmoving activities in the vicinity of archaeological Retention of Applicant, City Engineer, Receipt of proof of retention of resources (note: confidential archaeological mapping is on file at the Archaeologist: Prior to Community Development archaeologist City of Moorpark), the project applicant shall provide written all earthmoving Director evidence to the City of Moorpark Community Development Director activities in the vicinity or designated representative that a County - certified archaeologist of archaeological has been retained, shall be present at the pregrading meeting, shall resources. establish procedures for archaeological resource surveillance, and shall establish, in cooperation with the City or landowner, procedures for temporarily halting or redirecting work to permit the sampling, identification, and evaluation of any artifacts found, as appropriate. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, archaeological procedures shall be incorporated as a note on the grading plan cover sheet. If additional or unexpected archaeological features are discovered, the archaeologist shall Notes: Prior to issuance Applicant, Archaeologist, Review of notes on grading report such findings to the City of Moorpark Community of grading permit. City Engineer, Community plans Development Director or designated representative. If the Development Director archaeological resources are found to be significant, the archaeological observer shall determine appropriate actions, in cooperation with the City, for exploration and /or salvage. The archaeologist shall submit a follow -up report to the City of Moorpark Community Development Department, which shall include the period of inspection, an analysis of any artifacts found, and the present repository of the artifacts. Excavated finds shall be offered to the County of Ventura and /or designee, on a first refusal basis. If the artifacts are refused, the landowner may retain said finds if written assurance is provided that they will be properly preserved in the County, unless said finds are of special significance, or a museum in the County of Ventura indicates a desire to study and /or display them at this time, in which case items shall be donated to the City or designee. If no such assurance is provided by the landowner, the City shall retain the artifacts and shall be subject to the same stipulations set forth in this mitigation measure for disposition of artifacts. These actions, as well as final mitigation and disposition of the resources, shall be subject to the approval of the City of Moorpark Community Development Director or designated representative. In accordance with California Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5, if human remains are found, no further excavation or disturbance of the site or any nearby area reasonably suspected to C'. \Documents and Settings\DanaP \My Documents\North Park Village EIR \Draft MMP Table- 030305[1].docCADocuments and Settings \DanaP \My Documents \North Park Village EIR \Draft MMP Table- 030305[1].doc 45 Mitigation C 0 North Park Specific Plan No. 2001 -01 Revised Draft Mitigation Monitoring Program TABLE 1 (continued) NORTH PARK SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 2001 -01 MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM EIR Section /Mitigation Program Timing of Mitigation Responsible Party(lies) Monitoring Action overlie adjacent remains shall occur until the County Coroner has determined the appropriate treatment and disposition of the human remains. The County Coroner shall make such determination within two working days of notification of discovery. The County Coroner shall be notified within 24 hours of the discovery. If the County Coroner determines that the remains are or believed to be Native American, the County Coroner shall notify the Native American Heritage Commission in Sacramento within 24 hours. In accordance with California Public Resources Code Section 5097.98, the Native American Heritage Commission must immediately notify those persons it believes to be the most likely descended from the deceased Native American. The descendents shall complete their inspection within 24 hours of notification. The designated Native American representative would then determine, in consultation with the property owner, the disposition of the human remains. 2. Prior to tentative tract map approval for tract directly or indirectly Prior to tentative tract Applicant, Archaeologist, Review and acceptance of affecting archaeological sites CA -VEN -509, -1130, -1131, -1134, - map approval for tract City Engineer, Community reports from archaeologist, 1135, -1137, -1138, -1140, -1143, -1146, -1148, and -1149, these directly or indirectly Development Director further action if necessary archaeological sites shall be mitigated to a less than significant affecting archaeological level. This shall be accomplished through implementation of one of sites CA -VEN -509, - the following mitigation options: 1130, -1131, -1134, - a. Relocation of grading boundaries /fuel modification zones to 1135, -1137, -1138, - completely avoid disturbance to the site(s). Should the 1140, -1143, -1146, -1148, and -1149 boundary relocation be infeasible, an archaeological monitor shall be present during grading and fuel modification brush clearance in the vicinity of archaeological resources (note: confidential archaeological mapping is on file at the City of Moorpark). Fencing or stakes shall be erected outside of the sites to visually depict the areas to be avoided during construction. C: \Documents and Settings \DanaP \My Documents \North Pads Village EIR \Draft MMP Table- 030305(l) .docC:\ Documents and Settings \DanaP \My Documents \North Park Village EIR\Draft MMP Table- 030305[11.doc 46 Mitigation North Park Specific Plan No. 2001 -01 Revised Draft Mitigation Monitoring Program TABLE 1 (continued) NORTH PARK SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 2001 -01 MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM EIR Section /Mitigation Program Timing of Mitigation Responsible Party(ies) Monitoring Action Or, if avoidance /preservation is not feasible, then: b. Prior to grading in the vicinity of archaeological resources (note: confidential archaeological mapping is on file at the City of Moorpark), Phase III data recovery (salvage excavations) shall be conducted for these archaeological sites or any other sites within the potential impact area of development that cannot be avoided. The Phase III work shall provide sufficient scientific information to fully mitigate the impacts of development on these sites and be performed in accordance with standards of the State Office of Historic Preservation. 271n accordance with California Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5, if human remains are found, no further excavation or disturbance of the site or any nearby area reasonably suspected to overlie adjacent remains shall occur until the County Coroner has determined the appropriate treatment and disposition of the human remains. The County Coroner shall make such determination within two working days of notification of discovery. The County Coroner shall be notified within 24 hours of the discovery. If the County Coroner determines that the remains are or believed to be Native American, the County Coroner shall notify the Native American Heritage Commission in Sacramento within 24 hours. In accordance with California Public Resources Code Section 5097.98, the Native American Heritage Commission must immediately notify those persons it believes to be the most likely descended from the deceased Native American. The descendents shall complete their inspection within 24 hours of notification. The designated Native American representative would then determine, in consultation with the property owner, the disposition of the human remains. 3. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit for the roadway alignment Prior to the issuance of Applicant, Archaeologist, Review and acceptance of associated with the proposed Moorpark College SR -118 first grading permit for City Engineer, Community Phase II investigation interchange associated with the North Park Specific Plan project, a roadway alignment for Development Director Moorpark College Road County - certified archaeologist shall be retained by the City of and SR -118 interchange Moorpark, at the expense of the project applicant, to perform a Phase II subsurface test -level investigation and surface collection for CA -VEN -1584. The test -level report evaluating the site shall include a discussion of the site's significance (depth, nature, condition, and extent of the resources), and final mitigation recommendations and cost estimates, if required to fully mitigate significant impacts. Should the Phase II subsurface test -level investigation and surface collection determine the potential CADocuments and Settings \DanaP \My Documents\North Park Village EIR \Draft MMP Table- 030305[1].docCADocuments and Settings\DanaP \My Documents\North Park Village EIR \Draft MMP Table- 030305[1].doc 47 Mitigation I� North Park Specific Plan No. 2001 -01 Revised Draft Mitigation Monitoring Program TABLE 1 (continued) NORTH PARK SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 2001 -01 MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM EIR Section /Mitigation Program Timing of Mitigation Responsible Party(ies) Monitoring Action presence of significant subsurface resources, CA -VEN -1584 shall be mitigated to a less than significant level through the implementation of one of the following mitigation options: a. Relocation of grading boundaries /fuel modification zones to completely avoid disturbance to the site(s). Should the boundary relocation be infeasible, an archaeological monitor shall be present during grading and fuel modification brush clearance in the vicinity of archaeological resources (note: confidential archaeological mapping is on file at the City of Moorpark). Fencing or stakes shall be erected outside of the sites to visually depict the areas to be avoided during construction. Or, if avoidance /preservation is not feasible, then: b. Prior to grading in the vicinity of archaeological resources (note: confidential archaeological mapping is on file at the City of Moorpark), Phase III data recovery (salvage excavations) shall be conducted for these archaeological sites or any other sites within the potential impact area of development that cannot be avoided. The Phase 111 work shall provide sufficient scientific information to fully mitigate the impacts of development on these sites and be performed in accordance with standards of the State Office of Historic Preservation. Excavated finds shall be offered to the County of Ventura, or designee, on a first refusal basis. If the artifacts are refused, the landowner may retain said finds if written assurance is provided that they will be properly preserved in the County of Ventura, unless said finds are of special significance, or a museum in the County of Ventura indicates a desire to study and /or display them at this time, in which case items shall be donated to the City or designee. If no such assurance is provided by the landowner, the City shall retain the artifacts and shall be subject to the same stipulations set forth in this mitigation measure for disposition of artifacts. Final mitigation shall be carried out based upon the report recommendations and a determination as to the site's disposition by the City of Moorpark Community Development Department based on the recommendations of a County - certified archaeologist. Possible determinations include, but are not limited to, preservation, salvage, partial salvage, or no mitigation necessary. C'. \Documents and Settings\DanaP \My Documents \North Park Village EIR \Draft MMP Table- 030305[1].docC1Documents and Settings \DanaP \My Documents \North Park Village EIR \Draft MMP Table- 030305[1].doc 48 Mitigation O North Park Specific Plan No. 2001 -01 Revised Draft Mitigation Monitoring Program TABLE 1 (continued) NORTH PARK SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 2001 -01 MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM EIR Section /Mitigation Program Timing of Mitigation Responsible Party(ies) Monitoring Action In accordance with California Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5, if human remains are found, no further excavation or disturbance of the site or any nearby area reasonably suspected to overlie adjacent remains shall occur until the County Coroner has determined the appropriate treatment and disposition of the human remains. The County Coroner shall make such determination within two working days of notification of discovery. The County Coroner shall be notified within 24 hours of the discovery. If the County Coroner determines that the remains are or believed to be Native American, the County Coroner shall notify the Native American Heritage Commission in Sacramento within 24 hours. In accordance with California Public Resources Code Section 5097.98, the Native American Heritage Commission must immediately notify those persons it believes to be the most likely descended from the deceased Native American. The descendents shall complete their inspection within 24 hours of notification. The designated Native American representative would then determine, in consultation with the property owner, the disposition of the human remains. 4. In order to reduce indirect impacts from increased human presence Prior to occupancy of Applicant, Archaeologist, Review and acceptance of on preserved archaeological sites outside of the development area, residential units Community Development program, site inspection a program to limit human access shall be implemented prior to anywhere on the Director occupancy of residential units anywhere on the Specific Plan site. Specific Plan site The plan shall be developed and implemented by the project applicant and approved by a County- certified archaeologist familiar with the resources present at the Specific Plan site. The plan shall include one or more of the following: a. Fencing and /or other access - restriction methods around archaeologically sensitive areas of the Specific Plan site to inhibit human access, or b. Planting of non - invasive plant species with thorns or other characteristics in areas close to known resource to discourage human presence, or c. Capping of known resources, in consultation with a County - certified archaeologist. C 0 G O CADocuments and Settings \DanaP \My DocumentMorth Park Village EIR \Draft MMP Table- 030305[1].docCADocuments and Settings \DanaP \My Documents \North Park Village EIR\Draft MMP Table- 030305[1].doc 49 Mitigation Ul 0 0 N North Park Specific Plan No. 2001 -01 Revised Draft Mitigation Monitoring Program TABLE 1 (continued) NORTH PARK SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 2001 -01 MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM EIR Section /Mitigation Program Timing of Mitigation Responsible Party(ies) Monitoring Action 5. Prior to the approval of grading plans for any subdivision, planned Prior to the approval of Applicant, Paleontologist, Review and acceptance of residential development permit, or conditional use permit requiring grading plans for any City Engineer, Community report, proof of retention of grading, a soils report shall be submitted to the Community subdivision, planned Development Director paleontologist, observation Development Director for review and approval identifying the types residential development during grading operations of soils that will be exposed to grading /disturbance activities. permit, or conditional Paleontological resource requirements shall be incorporated as a use permit requiring note on the grading plan cover sheet. For most grading activities, a grading qualified paleontologist shall be retained by the property owner or the City of Moorpark, at the expense of the project applicant, to monitor, and, if necessary, salvage scientifically significant fossil remains during grading operations. The duration of these inspections shall be determined by the paleontologist and shall depend on the sensitivity of the rock units, the rate of excavation, and the abundance of fossils. The duration shall be determined by: a. Grading activities in geologic units of high paleontological sensitivity shall require full -time monitoring by a qualified paleontologist. b. Geologic units of low or moderate paleontological sensitivity shall require part-time monitoring. If significant fossils are observed during grading, full -time monitoring shall be implemented. c. The paleontologists shall have the power to temporarily divert or direct grading efforts to allow for evaluation and any necessary salvage of exposed fossils. d. Monitoring may be reduced if the potentially fossiliferous units described in this assessment are not present subsurface or, if present, are determined upon exposure and examination by qualified paleontological personnel to have low potential to contain fossil resources. 6. During paleontological studies, matrix samples for microvertebrates During paleontological Applicant, Paleontologist, Receipt of repository shall be collected and processed. Recovered specimens shall be studies Community Development agreement, sampling and prepared to a point of identification and permanent preservation, Director reporting including washing sediments to recover small vertebrates or invertebrates, and curated in a qualified museum repository with permanent retrievable storage. The paleontologist shall have a written repository agreement prior to the initiation of mitigation activities. These remains shall be donated to an institution with a research and /or educational interest in the materials such as the Los Angeles County Museum of Natural History. C. \Documents and Settings \DanaP \My Documents \North Park Village EIR \Draft MMP Table- 030305[t].docC \Documents and Settings \DanaP \My Documents \North Park Village EIR \Draft MMP Table- 030305[t].doc 50 Mitigation 0 O 0 W North Park Specific Plan No. 2001 -01 Revised Draft Mitigation Monitoring Program TABLE 1 (continued) NORTH PARK SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 2001 -01 MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM EIR Section /Mitigation Program Timing of Mitigation Responsible Party(ies) Monitoring Action 7. Prior to the conclusion of grading activities for any subdivision, a Prior to the conclusion Applicant, Paleontologist, Receipt and acceptance of final report summarizing findings, including an itemized inventory of grading activities for City Engineer, Community report and contextual stratigraphic data, shall accompany the fossils to the any subdivision Development Director designated repository with an additional copy sent to the City of Moorpark Community Development Director or designated representative. Locations of recorded fossil deposits shall remain confidential and shall be disclosed only on a "need -to- know" basis. The report and inventory, when submitted, would signify completion of the program to mitigate impacts to paleontological resources for that subdivision. 3.10 Public Services and Utilities Fire Protection Project Design Features • A minimum 200 - foot -wide fuel modification zone from the buildable Prior to the approval of Applicant, Community Review of Tentative Tract pad along the northern portion of the site contiguous to the Nature any Tentative Tract Map Development Director, and Maps Preserve. City Engineer • A 1 5 -.ac re fife - station- -site The fire station site identified in the Prior to issuance of first Applicant, Ventura County Acceptance of fire station site npr>veci.,._Sptgific Pan -is s posed - adjace+ t ic3 - the --Garr ±i building permit Fire Protection District, and f12TkY uth -Spout PRa-r4 site -This -site will be offered for dedication Moorpark Community to the Ventura County Fire Protection District ( VCFPD). If the Development Director, and VCFPD determines that another site within the boundaries of the Public Works Director Specific Plan site or outside of the Specific Plan site is preferable, an alternative site could be offered for dedication upon the consent of the applicant. The location and development of a fire station would be subject to and implemented in accordance with an agreement between the VCFPD, the City of Moorpark, and the project applicant. • An emergency services helispot will be provided in the Specific Flan Prior to issuance of first Applicant, Ventura County Review of grading plans, site planning area. The purpose of this facility is to provide a location grading permit Fire Protection District, City inspection for firefighting helicopters to land and fill with water or fuel during Engineer, Community emergency operations. It will be constructed in an area mutually Development Director agreed upon by the City of Moorpark, the Ventura County Fire Protection District, and the project applicant. No private or commercial use of the facility would be permitted. C \Documents and Settings\DanaP \My Documents \North Park Village EIR\Draft MMP Table- 030305[1].docC.\Documents and Settings \DanaP\My Documents \North Park Village EIR \Draft MMP Table- 030305[11.doc 51 Mitigation ,J r0 r North Park Specific Plan No. 2001 -01 Revised Draft Mitigation Monitoring Program TABLE 1 (continued) NORTH PARK SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 2001 -01 MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM EIR Section /Mitigation Program Timing of Mitigation Responsible Party(ies) Monitoring Action • The project applicant has offered to enter into a Development Per Development Applicant, City of Moorpark Per Development Agreement Agreement with the City of Moorpark through which the Specific Agreement Plan project would reimburse the City for any property tax revenues lost through the property tax agreement with the County of Ventura associated with and at the time of annexation of the site to the City. These revenues would be available to the City of Moorpark for city services related to the project. Standard Conditions and Requirements • The project applicant shall pay to the City of Moorpark capital As required for Applicant, City of Moorpark Receipt of fees improvement, development, and processing fees at the rate and individual fees amount in effect at the time the fees are required to be paid. Said fees shall include but not be limited to Library Facilities Fees, Police Facilities Fees, Fire Facilities Fees, entitlement processing fees, and plan check and permit fees for buildings and public improvements. • All structures adjacent to open space shall be designed to satisfy at Prior to issuance of Applicant, Ventura County Review of plans, site least a one -hour fire - resistant rating. Such structures shall building permits Fire Protection District, inspection incorporate fire retardant features such as boxed -in eaves, reduced Building Official, Community overhangs, double paned windows, convection resistant roof Development Director design, non - combustible roofing material, and related design features, as set forth in the City of Moorpark Building Code. Building permits shall not be issued until review of fire retarding architectural features has been completed by the City of Moorpark Building Department. Design standards meeting City of Moorpark Building Department criteria shall be included in the Fire Hazard Reduction Program and incorporated into the Fire Hazard Reduction Design Guidelines for the residential units. • During all grading and site clearance activities, all earthmoving During all grading and Applicant, Ventura County Observation of grading equipment shall be equipped with spark arrestors and at least two site clearance activities Fire Protection District, City activities portable fire extinguishers per vehicle. All equipment used in the Engineer vegetation clearance phase shall be equipped with spark arrestors and best available fire safety technology. The vegetation clearance activities shall be coordinated with and approved by the Ventura County Fire Protection District. • Prior to the issuance of building permits, the applicant shall be Prior to approval of Applicant and Ventura Review of plans, site required to comply with all Ventura County Fire Protection District im ravement -pIans County Fire Protection inspection design requirements regarding hydrant locations, fire ratings for �hvd.rant locations.) District building materials, fuel modification requirements, fee payments for Prior -to issuance of pro -rata cumulative impacts and other standard fire safety building permits requirements. (standard fire safety reuirementsj C'. \Documents and Settings \DanaP \My Documents \North Park Village EIR1Draft MMP Table- 030305[1].docCADocuments and Settings \DanaP \My Documents \North Park Village EIR\Draft MMP Table- 030305[1].doc 52 Mitigation North Park Specific Plan No. 2001 -01 Revised Draft Mitigation Monitoring Program TABLE 1 (continued) NORTH PARK SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 2001 -01 MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM EIR Section /Mitigation Program Timing of Mitigation Responsible Party(ies) Monitoring Action Mitigation Measures 1. Prior to approval of the first final map, the project applicant shall Prior to approval of first Applicant, Moorpark Review of agreement enter into an agreement with the Ventura County Fire Protection final map Community Development District (VCFPD) and City of Moorpark establishing the timing and Director, and Ventura funding for the provision of fire protection facility(ies) and County Fire Protection infrastructure requirements of the Specific Plan project. 1446 District ag,e meet_ shall _be_reviewed - andapproved4y- the- E+ty- af.Maerpark COMmu+rit.y-- Development Di +eetor, The agreement .... shall__4deritify hovv-- n'farfy - -l+-r -- carp -t3a -- kit: ++lt - armor-- te-- tf�e -p evisi+�n -o # -a ae�,v --#ire Slati_on....ssite - whefe- the-fire- station wGutd - -be - coated. -and- what additional re... IS.._..- needed ....... -for the project, ....Other requirernents fQe. building construction standards (e g sprinklers, rr�eta! ti+ n' moo# ngi sil arse be- set fain -tl ie-- greeseflt- The.agr- eeme +3t shall-also kliantify aiterfiatwe fl#ethod& fiOF -{ ovid +ng adegi.jate fire - protectionfactlities: should a fire station be located effsite - o-a- teary -le ec o+tfs-- in_staffinger servaves r wade available by the VCFPD, 2. Prior to the approval of the first final map, the project applicant shall Fire Hazard Reduction Applicant, Landscape Review and acceptance of Program: Prior to retain a certified fire management professional to prepare a Fire Architect, Ventura County Fire Hazard Reduction Hazard Reduction Program; this program shall be prepared in approval of first final Fire Protection District, Program, site inspection for consultation with the Ventura County Fire Protection District map Community Development lifetime of project (VCFPD) and the project biologist with expertise in native plants, Director, Biologist, and HOA, and shall be approved by the City of Moorpark Community Monitoring: For lifetime assessment direct, or similar of project entity Development Director. Said program will be developed by the project applicant, but shall be maintained by an entity(ies), such as a homeowners' association, assessment district, or similar entity, that can assure adequate fire hazard reduction management throughout the lifetime of the project. The program shall apply to all lands within 200 feet of the residences (or as amended by the certified fire professional based on fuel modification factors acceptable to the VCFPD. The program shall include, at a minimum, a vegetation management program focusing on the continued management of highly combustible vegetation while allowing for the retention for oak trees, providing defensible space, and the control of invasive non - native species. One component of the program shall be the permanent establishment of fuel modification zones to the standards of the VCFPD for all structures adjacent to open space areas with native vegetation. Residential building pads shall be a setback a minimum 100 feet from any protected biological resource. The fuel modification zone shall be designed by and planted under the supervision of a landscape architect with expertise in native plant materials and habitat C'. \Documents and Settings \DanaP \My Documents \North Park Village EIR \Draft MMP Table- 030305[1].docC \Documents and Settings \DanaP \My Documents \North Park Village EIR \Draft MMP Table- 030305[l] .doc 53 Mitigation V 1 0 Q North Park Specific Plan No. 2001 -01 Revised Draft Mitigation Monitoring Program TABLE 1 (continued) NORTH PARK SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 2001 -01 MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM EIR Section /Mitigation Program Timing of Mitigation Responsible Party(ies) Monitoring Action restoration. Native and non - native low -fuel vegetation materials shall be provided as replacement vegetation. The program shall include specific guidelines as to the frequency of maintenance (e.g., weed abatement), allowable species for planting, responsibility of clearing public and private zones, and irrigation requirements or restrictions. The timing and funding for the provision of the vegetation management program would be subject to and implemented in accordance with an agreement with the VCFPD. Law Enforcement Services • The project applicant has offered to enter into a Development Per Development Applicant, City of Moorpark Per Development Agreement Agreement with the City of Moorpark through which the Specific Agreement Plan project would reimburse the City for any property tax revenues lost through the property tax agreement with the County of Ventura associated with and at the time of annexation of the site to the City. These revenues would be available to the City of Moorpark for city services related to the project. Standard Conditions and Requirements • The applicant shall pay to the City of Moorpark capital improvement, As required for Applicant and City of Receipt of fees development, and processing fees at the rate and amount in effect individual fees. Moorpark at the time the fees are required to be paid. Said fees shall include but not be limited to Library Facilities Fees, Police Facilities Fees, Fire Facilities Fees, entitlement processing fees, and plan check and permit fees for buildings and public improvements. • Prior to issuance of building permits, the Police Department shall Prior to issuance of Applicant, Moorpark Police Review and acceptance of review development plans for the incorporation of defensible space building permits Department, Community plans, site inspection concepts to reduce demands on police services. To the degree Development Director feasible, public safety planning recommendations shall be incorporated into the project plans. The applicant shall prepare of list of project features and design components that demonstrate responsiveness to defensible space design concepts. Review and approval by the Police Department of all defensible space design features incorporated into the project shall occur prior to initiation of the building plan check process. Mitigation Measures 1. Prior to the initiation of grading, a construction security service shall Prior to the initiation of Applicant, Moorpark Police Receipt of proof of retention of be established at the construction site along with other measures, grading Department, Community construction security service as identified by the Moorpark Police Department and the Development Director Community Development Department, to be instituted during the grading and construction phase. CADocuments and Settings \DanaP \My Documents \North Park Village EIR \Draft MMP Table- 03030511 ].docC1Documents and Settings \DanaP \My Documents \North Park Village EIR \Draft MMP Table- 030305[li.doc 54 Mitigation C G7 North Park Specific Plan No. 2001 -01 Revised Draft Mitigation Monitoring Program TABLE 1 (continued) NORTH PARK SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 2001 -01 MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM EIR Section /Mitigation Program Timing of Mitigation Responsible Party(ies) Monitoring Action Potable Water Service Standard Conditions and Requirements • The applicant shall comply with all pertinent County of Ventura Prior to Final Map Applicant, Ventura County Review and acceptance of Public Works Department water and sewer connection regulations recordation of any Waterworks District No. 1 utility plans, site inspection implemented by the County of Ventura.Public Works Department phase. Waterworks District No. 1. • Prior to Final Map recordation of any phase, the City of Moorpark, Prior to Final Map Applicant, City Engineer, Review and acceptance of Calleguas Municipal Water District, and Ventura County recordation of any Calleguas Municipal Water plans, site inspection Waterworks District No. 1 shall approve final plans for water phase. District, and Ventura County distribution. The applicant shall either construct the required Waterworks District No. 1 distribution facilities or enter into an agreement with the Calleguas Municipal Water District and /or Waterworks District No. 1 stating when and how facilities will be funded and constructed. The system shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the proposed land uses and applicable City of Moorpark, Calleguas Municipal Water District, and Waterworks District No.1 standards. Recycled Water Service Project Design Features • A recycled water system for the Specific Plan site shall be provided Prior to Final Map Applicant, City Engineer, Receipt of agreement to for irrigation purposes to ensure recycled water is available for recordation of any Calleguas Municipal Water serve, review and acceptance irrigation of roadway landscaping, parks, public facilities, and other phase District, Ventura County of recycled system plans, site pertinent uses as a part of Phases B and C. Waterworks District No. 1, inspection City of Simi Valley Standard Conditions and Requirements • The applicant shall comply with all pertinent County of Ventura During construction Applicant, Ventura County Review and acceptance of Public Works Department water and sewer connection regulations Waterworks District No. 1 plans, site inspection implemented by the County of Ventura Public Works Department Waterworks District No. 1. Wastewater Standard Conditions and Requirements • The applicant shall comply with all pertinent County of Ventura Prior to Final Map Applicant, Ventura County Review and acceptance of Public Works Department water and sewer connection regulations Recordation of any Waterworks District No. 1 plans, site inspection implemented by the County of Ventura Public Works Department phase. Waterworks District No. 1. • The applicant shall be responsible for the construction of all onsite Prior to Final Map Applicant, Ventura County Receipt of agreement to and offsite sanitary sewer facilities and connections required to Recordation of any Waterworks District No. 1 serve, review and acceptance serve the project. The applicant shall enter into an agreement with phase. of sewer facility plans, site Ventura County Waterworks District No. 1 to construct the inspection improvements and the system shall be dedicated to Waterworks District No. 1 for maintenance. C \Documents and Settings \DanaP \My Documents \North Park Village EIR \Draft MMP Table- 030305[11.docC: \Documents and Settings \DanaP\My Documents \North Park Village EIR \Draft MMP Table - 030305[1) doc 55 Mitigation 0 �M1 W North Park Specific Plan No. 2001 -01 Revised Draft Mitigation Monitoring Program TABLE 1 (continued) NORTH PARK SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 2001 -01 MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM EIR Section /Mitigation Program Timing of Mitigation I Responsible Party(ies) 7 Monitoring Action Solid Waste Disposal Project Design Features • Where feasible, use recycled building materials (such as fences, Prior to issuance of Applicant, Community Review and acceptance of wheel block, benches, roofing, and siding materials) in commercial building permits. Development Director plans, site inspection and public facilities buildings. • Provide educational materials to each new resident and to schools After completion of each Applicant, Community Review and acceptance of demonstrating recycling and composting of landscape materials. phase of construction. Development Director educational materials Grass recycling, portable chipping, onsite composting, and reuse of trimmings, drip irrigation systems, and use of efficient fertilizers and other landscape components. • Construct residential units with built -in recycling and trash Prior to issuance of Applicant, Community Review and acceptance of separation areas. building permits Development Director plans Standard Conditions and Requirements • Prior to approval of the final map, a Solid Waste Management Plan Prior to approval of Applicant City's Community Review and acceptance of shall be prepared and submitted to the City's Community Services each final map Services Department Solid Waste Management Department Analyst responsible for Solid Waste Management Analyst responsible for Solid Plan Programs for review and approval. This plan, which shall include Waste Management specific measures to reduce the amount of refuse generated by Programs construction of the proposed project, shall be developed in consultation with the City of Moorpark Community Services Department to meet waste reduction requirements established by the California Integrated Waste Management Act of 1989. Energy Standard Conditions and Requirements of eaGh building the Prier to each building permit. .,........n.... peFrnit, appliGant shall submit plans ...to....the City. Engineer - demonstrating .that- eaoh....of... the project's buildings Will Gomply with the State F=Rergy CORservation Standards for Ale Desid-P 41 and N, dential Dvurid 24 D rf -.,f (Title AirtiGle 2, California Administrative Code). SDop't;;:need -^:see Air Quality Mitigation-. Measure.,. No. 4 Schools Project Design Features • An 18 -acre school site shall be.,_ con vey„ecJ #q_flie Moo rpsij fied Prior to issuance of first Applicant, Moorpark Unified Acceptance of school site by ._QLr School District -ded- icatcd as a part of Phase A of the Specific Plan building permit or as School District, Community Moorpark Unified School project. specified in the Development Director District _rovisionS of a t4itl ation Agreement between the applicant and the Moorpark. Unified School District. C'. \Documents and Settings \DanaP \My Documents \North Park Village EIR \Draft MMP Table- 030305[1].docC \Documents and Settings \DanaP \My Documents \North Park Village EIR \Draft MMP Table- 030305[1].doc 56 Mitigation 0 0 I� W North Park Specific Plan No. 2001 -01 Revised Draft Mitigation Monitoring Program TABLE 1 (continued) NORTH PARK SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 2001 -01 MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM EIR Section /Mitigation Program Timing of Mitigation Responsible Party(ies) Monitoring Action Standard Conditions and Requirements • The project applicant shall pay school fees to the Moorpark Unified Prior to the issuance of Applicant, Moorpark Unified Receipt of fees School District pursuant to the requirements established in California Government Code Section 65995. The amount of fees to each building permit or as s_... „..Decifie_d in the School District be paid will be determined based on the established State formula prgyisions_of_a for determining construction costs. Applicable fees shall be paid Mitigation Agreement between the applicant prior to the issuance of each building permit. The mitigation 2; tq,vic ect._ t )y_- t_he_applicant,_may__exceed _the_re L irements established and the Moar�ark Irk California Government Code Section 65995 through the Unified School District. previsions of a mitigation agreement between the ap Ip ica,nt and the I gpLpark Unified_School District, 3.11 Public Health and Safety Hazardous Materials and Waste Standard Conditions and Requirements • Prior to the issuance of the first grading permit, the developer shall Prior to the issuance of Applicant, City Engineer, Review and acceptance of indicate in writing to the City of Moorpark, the disposition of any oil the first grading permit County Water Resources report, site inspection or groundwater wells that may exist within the project site Development Department, boundaries. If any wells are designated for abandonment, or if California Division of Oil, future construction of any structure over or proximate to previously Gas, and Geothermal abandoned wells could result in a hazard to health or the Resources environment (Cal. Pub. Res. Code Sec, 3208.1), such wells must be abandoned or re- abandoned pursuant to requirements set forth in Ventura County Ordinance Nos. 2372 or 3991, and applicable regulations of the California Division of Oil, Gas, and Geothermal Resources (DOGGR). • Prior to the issuance of the first grading permit, the applicant shall t'ri-or to. initiation of Applicant, City Engineer, Review and acceptance of have prepared and submitted for review and approval by the City of Phase II investigation County Water Resources scope of work_Llgil for Phase (review and acceptance Moorpark the necessary investigation, including a "Phase II” Development Department, it inv_estiqation including of Phase Ii.,work,_plan investigation, to determine if the prior operation of all active and California Division of Oil, review and acceptance of soil abandoned on -site oil wells and pipelines caused any contamination including soil and soil Gas, and Geothermal and Soil QaS sampling as salnpling programs of the subsurface soil or groundwater. A work plan for this Resources program, review and Prior to the issuance of rnest gation niLi, t be a('Dj2v,e by the City t�tior to its initiation fhe acceptance of Phase, II investigation final report, site inspection Phase ii , investloation shall include a soil sampling and soil gas sampiinoprc�rtt am to identify any potential contaminatlonjiicluding wri.............. .? n_a_tr........................ > e.._ ta„ ar. y__ ur�rnapped „pipelines_.s .pdisp sat i Eas; -.-If such contamination is discovered, the applicant shall the first grading permit comply with all applicable laws, rules, and regulations concerning (review and acceptance of PhaseII investigation the reporting, analysis and, if necessary, remediation of any such f rra!_r2port._artd.._site contamination, which laws and regulatory requirements are based on the extent and nature of any contamination discovered. The ia§p -ction applicant shall comply with the above laws and regulations C. \Documents and Settings\DanaP \My Documents\North Park Village EIR \Draft MMP Table- 030305[1].docC: \Documents and Settings \DanaP \My Documents \North Park Village EIR \Draft MMP Table- 030305[l) .doc 57 Mitigation Q North Park Specific Plan No. 2001 -01 Revised Draft Mitiaation Monitonno Prooram TABLE 1 (continued) NORTH PARK SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 2001-01 MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM EIR Section /Mitigation Program Timing of Mitigation Responsible Party(ies) Monitoring Action concerning the abandonment of the oil wells and any necessary remediation of any surface and subsurface contamination with respect to property that it owns in the Specific Plan area (including the Specific Plan area and the area for the access road and freeway interchange that is outside the Specific Plan area) and, if feasible and necessary to satisfy the conditions of project approval, with respect to any property in the development area that the developer does not own. • If any hazardous waste is encountered during the construction of During grading and Applicant, City Engineer, Observation of grading and this project, all work in the immediate vicinity of the hazardous construction activities Ventura County construction activities waste shall be immediately stopped and the Ventura County Environmental Health Environmental Health Department, the Fire Department, the Department, Ventura County Sheriffs Department, and the City Construction Observer shall be Fire Protection District, notified immediately. Work shall not proceed until clearance has Ventura County Sheriffs been issued by all of these agencies. Department • A site health and safety plan, which meets California Occupational Prior to commencing Applicant, City Engineer, Review and acceptance of Safety and Health Administration (Cal /OSHA) requirements, shall work on any Ventura County health and safety plan, site be prepared and in place prior to commencing work on any contaminated sites Environmental Health inspection contaminated sites. The applicant, through its contractor, shall Department ensure proper implementation of the health and safety plan. • Demolition activities involving asbestos materials are subject to the Prior to and during Applicant, Building Official, Site inspection National Emissions Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants demolition activities. Ventura County Air Pollution (NESHAP) regulations as listed in the Code of Federal Regulations Control District (40 CFR Park 61, Subpart M). These regulations require an inspection or survey of the site that is to be demolished to determine whether asbestos materials are present. Demolition activities are also subject to Ventura County Air Pollution Control District (VCAPCD) Rule 62.7, Asbestos, Demolition and Renovation. Compliance with VCAPCD Rule 62.7 is adequate to ensure that all asbestos entrainment will not cause a significant adverse impact (source: Ventura County Air Quality Assessment Guidelines, November 2000). Mitigation Measures 1. Any significant soil staining associated with oil operations on the Prior to the issuance of Applicant, City Engineer, Site inspection, further action project site shall be mitigated prior to the issuance of the first grading the first grading permit California Division of Oil, as determined necessary permit as follows: Soils that contain total petroleum hydrocarbons Gas, and Geothermal (TPH) in concentrations below the action level may be left in place, Resources, County of provided that the soils do not contain other hazardous materials. The Ventura Environmental Ventura County Environmental Health Department shall be contacted Health Department by the City of Moorpark regarding regulations on clean -up levels for naturally- occurring crude oil. All areas where oil wells, pipelines, or C. \Documents and Settings \DanaP \My Documents \North Park Village EIR \Draft MMP Table- 030305[1[.docC: \Documents and Settings \DanaP \My Documents \North Park Village EIR \Draft MMP Table- 030305[1[.doc 58 Mitigation 0 0 North Park Specific Plan No. 2001 -01 Revised Draft Mitigation Monitoring Program TABLE 1 (continued) NORTH PARK SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 2001 -01 MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM EIR Section /Mitigation Program Timing of Mitigation Responsible Party(ies) Monitoring Action other activities where crude oil may have spilled with the project grading permits: d' uring plans, site inspection site, including the area for the access road and freeway interchange rg ading shall be evaluated and all contaminated soil shall be treated or disposed of in accordance with all applicable regulatory guidelines under the VCEHD Voluntary Cleanup Program and any other applicable regulations. 2. All sumps and spill containment areas located within the Specific Prior to issuance of Applicant, City Engineer Site inspection Plan development area shall be identified and sampled to determine grading permits the types and concentrations of the contaminants present, if any. If contaminants are encountered, the vertical and lateral extent of contamination shall be assessed before a remediation alternative can be selected. Soils stained only with crude oil and containing TPH in concentrations below the action level established by the local lead regulatory agency may be left in place or used as fill materials. Offsite disposal may be required for soils contaminated with heavy metals, solvents, or other substances. 3. The presence of an active oil field, including oil wells, sumps, and Prior to issuance of Applicant, City Engineer Review and acceptance of associated tanks, suggest that methane may be present in soil building permits methane gas assessment vapor beneath the site. Because grading can affect methane report: further action as concentrations, a comprehensive methane gas assessment shall be determined necessary completed post - grading in these areas to determine if, and the extent to which, methane mitigation measures (vapor barriers, active or passive venting, etc.) would be required prior to or during construction. Measures shall be implemented, if required, based on methane concentrations, if detected, based on regulatory requirements. 4. Natural oil seep areas shall be avoided, if feasible, during grading Prior to issuance of Applicant, City Engineer Review and acceptance of operations to minimize the spread of the related petroleum grading permits: d' uring plans, site inspection hydrocarbons into the surrounding soil. rg ading 5. To determine the nature and extent of potential lead contamination Prior to grading permit Applicant, City Engineer Sampling, testing, and in the soils around the area of the shooting range, limited baseline issuance in the area of reporting sampling of the shallow soils and analysis for lead prior to the start the shooting range. of grading operations shall be performed. If contamination is present, the soil shall be removed and transported to an appropriate waste disposal facility, in accordance with current regulatory 6. In the event unidentified, obvious, or suspected hazardous Applicant, City Engineer, Observation of grading and materials, contamination, underground tanks, or other features or gfadiRg peFFn+ts During County of Ventura construction activities materials that could present a threat to human health or the grading and Environmental Health environment are discovered during grading or construction, such construction Department activities shall cease immediately until evaluated by a qualified C: \Documents and Settings \DanaP \My Documents \North Park Village EIR \Draft MMP Table - 030305[1]. docC: \Documents and Settings \DanaP \My Documents \North Park Village EIR \Draft MMP Table- 030305[1].doc 59 Mitigation North Park Specific Plan No. 2001 -01 Revised Draft Mitigation Monitoring Program TABLE 1 (continued) NORTH PARK SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 2001 -01 MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM EIR Section /Mitigation Program Timing of Mitigation Responsible Party(ies) Monitoring Action professional. Work shall not continue until appropriate actions recommended by the professional have been implemented to demonstrate that contaminant concentrations do not exceed risk - based criteria. 7. Work crews shall use respirators during project clearing, grading, During grading Applicant Observation of grading and excavation operations, in accordance with California Division of activities Occupational Safety and Health regulations. 8. The cabs of grading and construction equipment shall be air- During grading Applicant Observation of grading conditioned. activities 9. Construction roads shall be paved, when possible, to reduce During grading Applicant Observation of grading fugitive dust and potential exposure to the fungus attributable to activities San Joaquin Valley Fever; or the access road into the project site shall be paved or treated with environmentally -safe dust control agents. 10. Where acceptable to the Ventura County Fire Protection District, During grading and Applicant, City Engineer, Site inspection weed growth shall be controlled by mowing instead of discing, construction. Ventura County Fire thereby leaving the ground undisturbed; a mulch covering shall also Protection District be used when possible. O CADocuments and Settings \DanaP \My Documents \North Park Village EIR\Draft MMP Table- 030305[1].docCADocuments and Settings \DanaP \My DocumentsWorth Park Village EIR \Draft MMP Table- 030305[l] .doc 60 Mitigation lV