HomeMy WebLinkAboutAGENDA REPORT 2005 0601 CC REG ITEM 09AITEM q • A -
CITY OF MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA
City Council Meeting
of 'o744f
AC11ON: idea"
MOORPARK CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA REPORT
TO: The Honorable City Council
FROM: Steven Kueny, City Manager
C�L
DATE: May 25, 2005 (CC Meeting of June 1, 2005)
SUBJECT: Consider Second Amendment to Memorandum of
Understanding (MOU) between North Park Village, LP and
City of Moorpark
BACKGROUND:
In December 2001, the City and North Park Village, LP (North
Park) entered into an MOU pertaining to processing of North
Park's development plans. The MOU was amended in January 2003 to
address the project schedule.
DISCUSSION:
This proposed Second Amendment addresses four (4) matters, as
follows:
1. In the event the City Council certifies the project EIR and
calls a special election for voter approval of all or some
of the Project Entitlements, and the voters approve such
Project Entitlements at the election, City will cooperate
with North Park to annex the North Park property to the
City, provided North Park has executed the Development
Agreement;
2. Obligates North Park to pay for the cost of the election and
guarantees payment of those costs;
3. Obligates North Park to pay City $50,000.00 for preparation
of a Park Master Plan; and
City Council Agenda Report
Re: Second Amendment to MOU between North Park Village, LP, and
City of Moorpark
Page 2
May 25, 2005 (CC Meeting of June 1, 2005)
4. Extends North Park's indemnification of City to election and
pre- annexation challenges.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Approve MOU subject to final language approval of City Attorney
and City Manager.
SK:db
Attachment: Second Amendment to MOU between North Park
Village, LP, and City of Moorpark
S: \City Manager \Everyone \ccagenda \Second Amendment to MOU for North Park.doc
SECOND AMENDMENT TO THE DECEMBER 10, 2001
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING
BETWEEN THE CITY OF MOORPARK AND NORTH PARK VILLAGE, LP
This Second Amendment to the December 10, 2001 Memorandum of
Understanding ( "Second Amendment ") is entered into this 1" day of June, 2005,
by and among the City of Moorpark, a municipal corporation ( "the City ") and
North Park Village, LP, a California limited partnership, Hidden Creek Ranch,
L.P., a California limited partnership, and Messenger Investment Company, a
California corporation (collectively, "Developer "). This Second Amendment is
made and entered into with respect to the following recitals, and in consideration
of the terms, covenants and conditions set forth below:
1.0 RECITALS
1.1 The City and Developer entered into a Memorandum of
Understanding (MOU) on December 10, 2001 concerning the
parties' agreements and mutual understandings with respect to the
processing of Developer's development plans for the Developer's
property through the City (developer's property is described on
Exhibit "A" attached hereto).
1.2 The MOU was amended by the First Amendment, dated January
10, 2003 to address certain revisions to the Project Schedule.
1.3 The City has been processing an EIR, as well as General Plan
Amendment No. 2001 -05, Specific Plan No. 2001 -01, Zone Change
No. 2001 -02 and a Development Agreement (collectively, the
"Project Entitlements" as described in the MOU) for development of
Developer's property and it is anticipated that the City Council is
near completion of that processing.
1.4 At the conclusion of the City Council's consideration of the Project
Entitlements, the Council will either refuse to certify the EIR, or
certify the EIR and forward some or all of the Project Entitlements
to the voters of the City of Moorpark for their consideration.
1.5 Modifications to the MOU are necessary to address certain issues
in the event the City Council decides to forward some or all of the
Project Entitlements to the Moorpark voters.
NOW, THEREFORE, the parties agree to the following terms, covenants
and conditions:
SACity Managcr \Everyone\Agreements\.Second amendment to MOU wo leg format 0520 2005 doe
f-S k1• 0
2.0 AMENDMENTS TO MOU
2.1 Upon the execution of this Second Amendment, Developer shall
pay all outstanding City processing costs related to the Project
Entitlements.
2.2 Developer agrees to pay to the City no later than thirty (30) days
after City Council action setting an election for the voters to
consider approval of some or all of the Project Entitlements, Fifty
Thousand Dollars ($50,000.00) for the preparation of a City -wide
Parks Master Plan. Developer understands that failure to make
such payment may result in the City Council rescinding any such
resolution calling an election, at the City Council's discretion.
2.3 Developer agrees to pay all costs associated with the conduct of a
special election to consider approval of some or all of the Project
Entitlements. Such costs shall include, but not be limited to, staff
time, contract staff and /or consultants, equipment rental, etc. and
City overhead expenses of fifteen percent (15 %) on all out of
pocket and professional service costs. Developer agrees to deposit
with the City within ten (10) days of any Council
adoption of a resolution calling a special election. Costs shall be
deducted from such deposit by the City, and Developer agrees to
make such additional deposits as City may require to cover election
costs in the event the initial deposit amount is insufficient to cover
the election. Additionally, Developer agrees to post an irrevocable
letter of credit in the amount of $100,000 and in a form acceptable
to the City Attorney, securing Developer's obligation to reimburse
the City for election costs.
2.4 Developer agrees that its obligations as described under sections
7.7 and 7.12 of the MOU include, among other things, litigation
challenging the EIR for the project, as well as litigation in
connection with or arising out of any special election for the Project
and any post - election LAFCO proceedings for the Project.
2.5 City agrees that if the City Council in its discretion certifies the
project EIR and calls a special election for voter approval of all or
some of the Project Entitlements, and the voters approve such
Project Entitlements at the election, City shall cooperate with
Developer to annex Developer's property to the City, provided that
Developer has executed the Development Agreement. Developer
shall cooperate, and pay all direct, indirect, and out -of- pocket costs,
to process an application for expansion of the City's Sphere of
Influence and annexation of the property encompassed by SP
2001 -01 to the City of Moorpark. Said costs may include but are not
SAC'ity Manager \F veryone\Agreements\Sccond amendment to MOU wo leg format 0520 2005.doc
t\�ll�► n ��
limited to attorney fees, engineering fees, City staff costs, and City
overhead expenses of fifteen percent (15 %) on all out of pocket
and professional service costs.
3.0 EFFECT OF AMENDMENT
3.1 Except as expressly modified herein, all terms of the MOU and the
First Amendment remain in full force and effect. If any provision of
this Second Amendment is in conflict with any provision of the MOU
or First Amendment, the terms of this Second Amendment shall
govern.
3.2 Both City and Developer agree that neither party is in default with
respect to any provision of the MOU or First Amendment as of the
date of this Second Amendment.
3.3 Nothing in this Second Amendment shall in any way be construed
as a limitation on the City Council's discretion as described in
section 5.3 of the MOU.
4.0 RECORDATION
4.1 This Second Amendment may be recorded with the Ventura County
Recorders office by the City.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties to the MOU, and as amended by the First
Amendment, have executed this Second Amendment on the day and year first
set forth above.
CITY OF MOORPARK:
Patrick Hunter, Mayor
ATTEST:
Deborah S. Traffenstedt, City Clerk
SACny Manager\Everyone\Agreements \Second amcndment to MOU wo leg format 0520 2005.doc
0 V vJ
DEVELOPER:
NORTH PARK VILLAGE, L.P., a California
Limited partnership
Kim John Kilkenny, Authorized Agent
HIDDEN CREEK RANCH, L.P., a California
Limited partnership
M
Kim John Kilkenny, Authorized Agent
HIDDEN CREEK RANCH, L.P., a California
Limited partnership
By: EAST VENTURA HILLS PARTNERS, L.P.,
A California limited partnership
By: MESSENGER PARTNERSHIP XVI, L.P.
A California limited partnership,
A General Partner
By: MESSENGER INVESTMENT COMPANY
A California corporation, a General Partner
IN
In
William S. Messenger, Jr., President
William S. Messenger, Jr., a General Partner
MESSENGER INVESTMENT COMPANY
A California corporation,
in
William S. Messenger, Jr., President
SACity Managcr \Evcryone\Agreements\Second amendment to MOU wo leg format 0520 2005.doe
Exhibit A
(Developer's Property)
TO BE INSERTED
SAC'ity Manager \8veryone�Agreements\Sccond amendment to MOU wo leg format 0520 2005 doc
!1 If ) n q ^