HomeMy WebLinkAboutAGENDA REPORT 2020 0115 REG CCSA ITEM 08ACITY OF MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA
City Council Meeting
of January 15, 2020
ACTION Adopted Urgency Ordinance No.
479; and Adopted Resolution No. 2020-
3870. BY B.Garza.
A. Consider Interim Urgency Ordinance to Extend the Existing Moratorium on the
Cultivation, Manufacturing, Testing, Storing, and Certain Sales of Industrial
Hemp in the City of Moorpark, Declaring the Urgency Thereof and the
Immediate Effectiveness of the Ordinance Pursuant to Government Code
Section 65858, 36934 and 36937, and Making a Determination of Exemption
under the California Environmental Quality Act; and Consider Resolution
Initiating Zoning Code Amendment to Address Permanent Regulations for
Industrial Hemp Uses. Staff Recommendation: 1) Conduct the public hearing
on the proposed extension of the moratorium on industrial hemp uses; and 2)
Waive full reading and adopt Urgency Ordinance No. 479 as read by title
only. (REQUIRES A ROLL CALL VOTE AND A 4/5THS VOTE OF THE
CITY COUNCIL TO ADOPT); and 3) Direct City staff to prepare a written
report of the steps taken to address the impacts of industrial hemp on the
community and have that report presented at least ten days before the
Interim Urgency Ordinance’s expiration date, currently scheduled for
December 16, 2020; and Adopt Resolution No. 2020-3870 to initiate the
preparation of a non-urgency ermanent amendment to the Zoning Code that
establishes zoning and other necessary restrictions on the cultivation,
manufacturing, testing, sale and storing of industrial hemp, and other
necessary restrictions on the sale of non-FDA approved products containing
CBD, in the City. (Staff: Troy Brown/Kevin Ennis)
Item: 8.A.
MOORPARK CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA REPORT
TO: Honorable City Council
FROM: Troy Brown, City Manager
Kevin G. Ennis, City Attorney
Nicholas R. Ghirelli, Assistant City Attorney
DATE: 01/15/2020 Regular Meeting
SUBJECT: Consider Interim Urgency Ordinance to Extend the Existing Moratorium
on the Cultivation, Manufacturing, Testing, Storing, and Certain Sales of
Industrial Hemp in the City of Moorpark, Declaring the Urgency Thereof
and the Immediate Effectiveness of the Ordinance Pursuant to
Government Code Section 65858, 36934 and 36937, and Making a
Determination of Exemption under the California Environmental Quality
Act; and Consider Resolution Initiating Zoning Code Amendment to
Address Permanent Regulations for Industrial Hemp Uses
INTRODUCTION
On December 18, 2019, the City Council adopted Interim Urgency Ordinance No. 477 to
impose a temporary, 45-day moratorium on the on the cultivation, manufacturing, testing,
and storing of industrial hemp, among other related activities such as drying and
processing industrial hemp, in all zoning districts of the City. The interim ordinance also
prohibits the sale of products that contain cannabidiols (“CBD”), if the sale of those
products requires FDA approval and the products do not have such approval. Finally, the
interim ordinance prohibits the sale of all industrial hemp products, if the sale comprises
five percent or more of a business’s floor area or gross sales in any month. The City will
not issue zoning permits, building permits, land use entitlements and business registration
permits for any of those activities within the City of Moorpark.
The initial 45-day term of Interim Urgency Ordinance No. 477 is scheduled to expire on
February 1, 2020. In order to extend the moratorium on industrial hemp uses, the City
Council must hold a public hearing and adopt a new interim urgency ordinance to extend
the moratorium for an additional 10 months and 15 days, through and including
December 16, 2020.
Item: 8.A.
1
Honorable City Council
01/15/2020 Regular Meeting
Page 2
BACKGROUND
Over the last several months, large numbers of residents in the Peach Hill, Mountain
Meadows, Serenata and other areas and neighborhoods in the southern portion of the City
have experienced offensive odors from relatively new and large-scale outdoor industrial
hemp farms located in the Tierra Rejada Valley located immediately south of the City in the
unincorporated area of the County of Ventura. Dozens of residents have called City and
County officials complaining of the continual skunk-like odor in their neighborhoods as
terpenes from a large farm of industrial hemp grown to produce CBD oil wafts into
residential neighborhoods adjacent to this hemp farm. Aside from having to experience
offensive odors, many of these residents also have complained of headaches, nausea,
sore throats and other physical side effects from breathing and smelling the distinctive odor
generated by industrial hemp grown to produce CBD oil.
In an effort to prevent industrial hemp uses from intruding into the City, on December 18,
2019, the City Council adopted Interim Urgency Ordinance No. 477 to temporarily prohibit
the cultivation, testing, storing, and certain retail uses of industrial hemp in the City.
Pursuant to Government Code Section 65858, the initial moratorium established by Interim
Urgency Ordinance No. 477 is scheduled to expire 45-days after its adoption, on
February 1, 2020. The Council directed staff to schedule a public hearing and prepare an
ordinance to extend the moratorium on industrial hemp uses for an additional 10 months,
15 days, through and including December 16, 2020 as permitted by Section 65858.
The additional time is needed to continue studying appropriate land use regulations for
industrial hemp and CBD uses and to prepare a permanent ordinance to codify those
regulations. Concurrently with the adoption of the ordinance to extend the moratorium, City
staff is also recommending that the City Council initiate the process of amending the
Zoning Code to codify the permanent industrial hemp regulations. A draft resolution to do
so is attached to this staff report.
A special meeting was held on Thursday, January 2, 2020, at which the City Council
adopted a report that briefly explains the reasons why the moratorium on industrial hemp
uses was adopted and the measures taken to alleviate the problems caused by industrial
hemp. Pursuant to Government Code Section 65858(d), this report must be adopted 10
days prior to any extension of an existing land use moratorium. A copy of the 10-day
report adopted by the City Council is also attached to the staff report.
DISCUSSION
A. Background
“Industrial hemp” is defined as “a fiber or oilseed crop, or both, that is limited to types of the
plant Cannabis sativa L. having no more than three-tenths of one percent (0.3%)
tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) contained in the dried flowering tops, whether growing or not;
the seeds of the plant; the resin extracted from any part of the plant; and every compound,
2
Honorable City Council
01/15/2020 Regular Meeting
Page 3
manufacture, salt, derivative, mixture, or preparation of the plant, its seeds or resin
produced therefrom.” In contrast, traditional cannabis, also known generally as marijuana,
has a THC content that exceeds 3/10th of one percent in its flowering tops, seeds or resin.
Industrial hemp is grown to produce a variety of products, including fiber for clothing,
textiles, paper, building materials and for CBD oil for human use and consumption.
Cannabis is principally grown for the psychoactive properties of THC when ingested.
Industrial hemp and cannabis are regulated differently under federal and state law.
On December 20, 2018, the Agricultural Improvement Act of 2018 (also known as the 2018
Farm Bill) was signed into law by the President of the United States. Effective January 1,
2018, that law removed industrial hemp from Schedule I of the federal Controlled
Substances Act and directed the U.S. Agricultural Department to develop a federal
regulatory oversight program for the cultivation, production and marketing of industrial
hemp.
Similarly, the California state government enacted a regulatory program to allow for the
cultivation of industrial hemp in California. Under that program, growers of industrial hemp
for commercial purposes must register with the county agricultural commissions and obtain
an annual permit. (See, generally, California Food and Agricultural Code Section 81000 et
seq. and Title 3 of the California Code of Regulations, Section 4900 et seq.)
B. Impacts on City
In the last year, Ventura County has become an increasingly popular area for the growing
of industrial hemp because of the County’s unique climate that allows for the year-round
and staggered growing of industrial hemp crops. The specific cultivar of industrial hemp
that is grown to produce CBD oil is a cultivar that produces a large amount of flowering
resin. This flowering resin produces a smell or terpene that is often described as having
the strong odor of marijuana or, to some, the smell of a skunk.
In the last year, a large farm area in the Tierra Rejada Valley just south of the City was
planted to grow industrial hemp. The specific type of cultivar planted to produce CBD oil
combined with the large acreage of hemp plants planted for staggered harvesting over
many months of the year has caused significant and pervasive foul orders to infiltrate the
southern portion of the City of Moorpark.
Dozens of residents in the affected area have described the impacts as being a nuisance.
Impacts include constant exposure to offensive odors, inside and outside their homes.
Many residents indicated that they are now inhibited from enjoying the outdoor areas
around their homes and from using passive and active recreation areas in their
neighborhoods. Many residents have reported headaches, nausea, and sore throats.
Given the strong and pervasive odor in the neighborhood, residents are concerned about
the potential diminution in the value of their homes and whether prospective purchasers of
homes in the area would be driven away by the pervasive and strong odor. Staff is
informed that the County’s recently adopted urgency ordinance is expected to prevent
3
Honorable City Council
01/15/2020 Regular Meeting
Page 4
industrial hemp farming in the Tierra Rejada Valley.
Additional concerns were raised about the volatile organic compounds (VOC) generated by
industrial hemp plants and whether large-scale production of industrial hemp could lead to
the increased generation of smog-producing ozone in Ventura County.
Public safety concerns were also raised. Ventura County Sheriff’s Captain Victor Fazio,
reported on the increased number of crimes committed by persons seeking to steal
industrial hemp plants from open and unsecured fields, the collateral crimes committed in
the course of those thefts, and the criminal element that is being attracted into Ventura
County to take advantage of these opportunities for theft.
Based on this information and all the evidence presented at its meeting of December 18th,
the City Council found that the cultivation, manufacturing, testing, sale, and storing of
industrial hemp poses a current and immediate threat to the public health, safety and
welfare of the community. Allowing for cultivation of industrial hemp in the City could
create similar and additional impacts from those noted in this report. The moratorium on
industrial hemp is, and continues to be, necessary to prohibit the cultivation,
manufacturing, testing, sale, and storing of industrial hemp in the City because any those
activities may be in conflict with zoning and municipal code regulations that the City may
want to adopt over the next several months. Moreover, given the reported incidents of theft
of industrial hemp, the City Council found that nearly all industrial hemp activities should be
prohibited.
The extension of the Interim Urgency Ordinance is needed to provide city staff with
additional time to study appropriate regulatory tools to address these impacts, including a
permanent prohibition on industrial hemp activities within the City, during the moratorium
period. City staff is preparing an ordinance to implement those tools. To that end, a
resolution to initiate a Zoning Code amendment is being presented to the City Council for
consideration.
C. CBD Products
The existing industrial hemp moratorium also prohibits the sale of industrial hemp-derived
CBD oil and CBD products that are not approved for human or animal consumption by the
Federal Drug Administration (FDA). At this time, the FDA has approved only one CBD
product, Epidiolex, a prescription drug product to treat two rare, severe forms of epilepsy.
The moratorium will not ban the sale of Epidiolex. The health and safety concerns giving
rise to the City Council’s decision to include the sale of unapproved CBD products in the
moratorium is fully explained and analyzed in the December 18, 2019 staff report, a copy
of which is attached hereto.
As part of staff’s comprehensive investigation of industrial hemp and its potential impacts
on public health, safety, and welfare, staff is continuing to evaluate whether and to what
extent retail sales of CBD products contribute to any such health and safety impacts.
4
Honorable City Council
01/15/2020 Regular Meeting
Page 5
Similarly, staff is also continuing to evaluate whether retail stores that have more than five
percent of their floor area or five percent of gross sales in any month, are appropriate uses
in the City of Moorpark.
INTERIM ORDINANCE PROCEDURES
California law authorizes municipalities to adopt “interim” ordinances that place an
immediate moratorium on the establishment of specified new activities and uses in the
City. California Government Code Section 65858 provides for the procedures and
requirements for the adoption of an “interim” ordinance.
Section 65858 provides that, without following normal zoning code ordinance adoption
procedures, a city council may, in order to protect the public health, safety, and welfare of
the community, adopt as an urgency measure an “interim ordinance” prohibiting any uses
that may be in conflict with a contemplated general plan, specific plan, or zoning proposal
that the City Council, Planning Commission or Planning Department is considering or
studying for adoption within a reasonable time.
Section 65858 provides that a city council cannot adopt an interim ordinance unless the
ordinance contains legislative findings that there is a current and immediate threat to the
public health, safety, or welfare, and that the approval of additional entitlements for a
specific use or uses would result in a threat to the public health, safety, or welfare.
Interim Urgency Ordinance No. 477 is scheduled to expire after an initial 45-day period
(until February 1, 2020.) As proposed here, the City Council may extend the interim
ordinance by an additional 10 months and 15 days by the adoption of an additional
urgency ordinance. The City Council must conduct a noticed public hearing prior to
extending the interim ordinance. The proposed extension also requires a four-fifths vote
for adoption.
On January 2, 2020, in accordance with Government Code Section 65858(d), the City
Council adopted a written report which describes the measure taken by the City to alleviate
the condition that led to the adoption of the ordinance. This written report was required to
be issued by the City Council at least 10 days prior to extension of the interim ordinance.
Finally, if the City has not been able to enact permanent zoning regulations during that
extension period, the law allows for one additional one-year extension, for a total
cumulative duration of the interim restrictions of two years.
Concurrent with the interim ordinance process, City staff has begun the process of
preparing permanent zoning and other regulations and then process those through the
normal zoning ordinance adoption process. That process will include a noticed public
hearing before the Planning Commission, the Planning Commission’s adoption of a
resolution making recommendations on the proposed text of a permanent ordinance to the
City Council, a noticed public hearing before the City Council and the regular two reading
5
Honorable City Council
01/15/2020 Regular Meeting
Page 6
processing for adoption of a non-urgency ordinance by the City Council.
Pursuant to Section 17.44.050 of the Moorpark Municipal Code, the City Council must
adopt a resolution of intent to initiate an amendment to the Zoning Code. As stated above,
a draft resolution for the Council’s consideration is attached to this report.
CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT
This extension of the interim ordinance is exempt from review under the California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) on several grounds.
This interim ordinance is categorically exempt from CEQA, under Section 15308 of the
State CEQA Guidelines, because this ordinance is a regulatory action taken by the City in
accordance with California Government Code Section 65858 to assure maintenance and
protection of the environment pending further review of the potential impacts of industrial
hemp uses in the City and completion of contemplated Zoning Ordinance revisions.
In addition, this interim ordinance is not a “project” within the meaning of Section 15378 of
the State CEQA Guidelines, because it has no potential to result in a direct physical
change in the environment, and it has no potential to result in any reasonably foreseeable
indirect physical change in the environment. The interim ordinance will impose greater
limitations on development in the City than under the current Zoning Code because the
moratorium will temporarily halt the cultivation, manufacturing, testing, and storing of
industrial hemp, the sale of products contains CBD if the sale of those products requires
FDA approval and have not obtained that approval, and the sale of industrial hemp
products if such products comprise five percent or more of a business’s floor space or
gross sales in any one month. The interim ordinance will thereby serve to reduce
potentially significant adverse environmental impacts caused by those activities in the City.
Finally, this interim ordinance is exempt from CEQA review pursuant to Section
15061(b)(3) of the State CEQA Guidelines. This interim ordinance is covered by the
general rule that CEQA applies only to projects that have the potential to cause a
significant effect on the environment. Because the interim ordinance will impose a
moratorium on cultivation, manufacturing, testing, and storing of industrial hemp, as well as
the sale of products containing CBD, if the sale of those products requires FDA approval
and have not obtained that approval, and the sale of industrial hemp products if such
products comprise five percent or more of a business’s floor space or gross sales in any
one month, it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that this ordinance will
have a significant effect on the environment, and therefore, this interim ordinance is not
subject to CEQA.
FISCAL IMPACT
There is no fiscal impact associated with this action.
6
Honorable City Council
01/15/2020 Regular Meeting
Page 7
COUNCIL GOAL COMPLIANCE
This action does not support a current strategic directive.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
1. Conduct the public hearing on the proposed extension of the moratorium on
industrial hemp uses; and
2. Waive full reading and adopt Urgency Ordinance No. ___ as read by title only.
(REQUIRES A ROLL CALL VOTE AND A 4/5THS VOTE OF THE CITY COUNCIL
TO ADOPT); and
3. Direct City staff to prepare a written report of the steps taken to address the impacts
of industrial hemp on the community and have that report presented at least ten
days before the Interim Urgency Ordinance’s expiration date, currently scheduled
for December 16, 2020; and
4. Adopt Resolution No. ____ to initiate the preparation of a non-urgency permanent
amendment to the Zoning Code that establishes zoning and other necessary
restrictions on the cultivation, manufacturing, testing, sale and storing of industrial
hemp, and other necessary restrictions on the sale of non-FDA approved products
containing CBD, in the City.
Attachment 1: Draft Urgency Ordinance No. ___ to Extend Moratorium
Attachment 2: Draft Resolution No. 2020-____ to Initiate Zoning Code Amendment
Attachment 3: 10-Day Report
Attachment 4: December 18, 2019 Staff Report on Moratorium
7
ATTACHMENT 1
ORDINANCE NO. ___
AN INTERIM URGENCY ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF
MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA, EXTENDING THE EXISTING
MORATORIUM ON THE CULTIVATION,
MANUFACTURING, TESTING, STORING, AND CERTAIN
RETAIL SALES OF INDUSTRIAL HEMP, DECLARING THE
URGENCY THEREOF AND THE IMMEDIATE
EFFECTIVENESS OF THIS ORDINANCE PURSUANT TO
GOVERNMENT CODE SECTIONS 65858, 36934 AND
36937, AND MAKING A DETERMINATION OF
EXEMPTION UNDER THE CALIFORNIA
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK DOES ORDAIN AS
FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. Findings
A. The City Council desires to provide for the public safety, health and
welfare of the residents and visitors to the City of Moorpark (“City”) by exercising its
police power authority under Section 7 of Article XI of the California Constitution. Based
on the findings and evidence set forth below, the City Council finds that certain uses of
industrial hemp may create public safety, health and welfare impacts within the City.
These activities include the cultivation, manufacturing, testing, retail sale, and storing of
industrial hemp. At this time, industrial hemp uses are not specifically listed for
regulation by Municipal Code Chapter 17.20 (Uses by Zone).
B. The City finds that the public welfare will be harmed without studying and
evaluating the impacts associated with industrial hemp, including odor, processing
safety, and the generation of air pollutants, such as volatile organic compounds (VOCs).
Dozens of residents have called City and County of Ventura (“County”) officials
complaining of the continual skunk-like odor in their neighborhoods as terpenes from a
large farm of industrial hemp grown to produce CBD oil wafts into residential
neighborhoods adjacent to this hemp farm. During public hearings regarding industrial
hemp, the City Council heard from a substantial number of individuals regarding the
harmful effects of the odor emanating from industrial hemp cultivation located adjacent
to the City in unincorporated areas of the County. Aside from having to experience
offensive odors, many of these residents also have complained of headaches, nausea,
sore throats and other physical side effects from breathing and smelling the distinctive
odor generated by industrial hemp grown to produce CBD oil.
C. The City Council finds that there is a current and immediate threat to the
public safety, health and welfare presented by the increased crime associated with
8
Ordinance No. ____
Page 2
industrial hemp activities. The Ventura County Sheriff’s Department documented 10
cases of hemp theft in only 34 days in October and November 2019, and the County
has arrested 10 individuals in connection with stolen hemp. During one such event a
firearm was reportedly brandished where the suspects were suspected of planning to
steal hemp plants. Of the 10 individuals arrested on suspicion of hemp theft, nine of
them resided outside of the County. Given that industrial hemp is now grown within the
County, the Sheriff’s Department is concerned that criminals are travelling into the
County for the purpose of stealing hemp plants and hemp paraphernalia. Theft of hemp
plants is made easier by limited security measures observed by the Sheriff’s
Department during inspections of existing hemp farms within the County. The additional
patrols and investigatory resources devoted to industrial hemp activities prevent the
Sheriff’s Department from undertaking other crime prevention activities in surrounding
areas, and it is reasonable to surmise that hemp activities within the City would detract
the Sheriff’s Department from undertaking other crime prevention activities in the City.
Based on this evidence, the City Council finds that the adoption of this Interim
Ordinance is necessary for the immediate preservation of the public safety, health and
welfare.
D. The City Council further finds that certain products containing or produced
with industrial hemp, primarily cannabidiols (CBD), have not yet received Federal Drug
Administration (FDA) approval to determine whether they are effective to treat particular
conditions or have other effects that may be claimed. In addition, such products have
not been subjected to an FDA evaluation to determine proper dosages, dangerous side
effects, or other safety conditions. As a result, persons purchasing such products may
be exposed to misleading, unproven, or false claims associated with industrial hemp
products, including CBD extracted from industrial hemp, which is a real and legitimate
public health and safety concern. Furthermore, the FDA has noted that it has seen only
limited data about CBD safety and the data points to real risks that should be
considered before CBD is ingested. Finally, according to the FDA, the quality of many
CBD products has not been fully evaluated with respect to the processing controls and
practices involved in the production of CBD that may put consumers at additional health
risks. For these reasons, the City Council desires to exercise its police power, including
the City’s land use authority, to protect the public health and safety from the risks
associated from the retail sale of industrial hemp products, including CBD, that have not
yet received approval from the FDA for consumption.
E. Allowing industrial hemp activities, without a complete and adequate state
and federal regulatory framework in place, will not adequately protect the public’s
safety, health and welfare. As such, if the City fails to enact this moratorium, industrial
hemp activities will continue to create a current and immediate threat to the public
safety, health and welfare.
9
Ordinance No. ____
Page 3
F. For the foregoing reasons, and based on all evidence made available to
the City Council, on December 18, 2019, the City Council adopted Interim Urgency
Ordinance No. 477 to establish an initial 45-day moratorium on the cultivation,
manufacturing, testing, storing, and certain retail sales of industrial hemp within the City.
G. During the initial 45-day moratorium, City staff undertook measures to
alleviate the conditions described above that led the City Council to adopt Interim
Urgency Ordinance No. 477. These measures include reviewing the County of
Ventura’s independent actions to mitigate impacts caused by industrial hemp cultivation,
conferring with the Ventura County Sheriff’s Department, researching actions taken by
the Federal Drug Administration and other jurisdictions to regulate industrial hemp, and
researching and developing permanent amendments to the Moorpark Zoning Code to
codify appropriate limitations on industrial hemp activities. These measures are more
fully explained in the report adopted by the City Council on January 2, 2020, pursuant to
Government Code Section 65858(d). This report is attached to the January 15, 2020
staff report accompanying this Interim Urgency Ordinance and made a part of the
record thereto.
H. The City is still undertaking its review of the measures needed to alleviate
the conditions that led to the adoption of Interim Urgency Ordinance No. 477.
Accordingly, the City Council is adopting this ordinance to extend the moratorium by an
additional 10 months, 15 days, unless terminated sooner by the City Council.
I. Pursuant to Government Code Section 65858(a), the City Council held a
duly noticed public hearing prior to adopting this Interim Ordinance.
J. The City Council finds that this Interim Ordinance is not subject to the
California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Sections 15061(c)(3) (the
activity will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in
the environment), 15060(c)(3) and 15378 (the activity is not a project under CEQA) of
the CEQA Guidelines, California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Chapter 3, because it
has no potential for resulting in physical change to the environment, directly or
indirectly. This is because the moratorium adopted by this Interim Ordinance merely
prohibits uses that have significant impacts on public health, safety and welfare, and
does not permit any development that could result in a significant change to the
environment. Furthermore, the moratorium established by this Interim Ordinance is
temporary pending the study and investigation of regulatory tools to address the
impacts created by industrial hemp activities. In addition, the Interim Ordinance is
categorically exempt from CEQA pursuant to Section 15308 of the CEQA Guidelines,
because this ordinance is a regulatory action taken by the City in accordance with
California Government Code Section 65858 to assure maintenance and protection of
10
Ordinance No. ____
Page 4
the environment pending further review of the potential impacts of industrial hemp uses
in the City and completion of contemplated Zoning Ordinance revisions.
SECTION 2. Definitions
A. “Cultivation” means the planting, growing, harvesting, drying, curing,
grading, or trimming of industrial hemp.
B. “Industrial hemp” means a fiber or oilseed crop, or both, that is limited to
types of the plant Cannabis sativa L. having no more than three-tenths of one percent
(0.3%) tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) contained in the dried flowering tops, whether
growing or not; the seeds of the plant; the resin extracted from any part of the plant; and
every compound, manufacture, salt, derivative, mixture, or preparation of the plant, its
seeds or resin produced therefrom.
C. “Unapproved industrial hemp products” means any item or thing
containing any amount of industrial hemp that is intended for human or animal
consumption and has not yet received approval by the United States Food and Drug
Administration.
D. “Manufacturing” means to compound, blend, extract, infuse, process, or
otherwise make or prepare an industrial hemp product.
E. “Retail sale” means any person or business selling or offering to sell, or to
otherwise convey or exchange for any form of consideration, the following: (1) industrial
hemp or products derived from any amount of industrial hemp where the sale of such
products comprises five percent or more of the business’s floor area or five percent or
more of the gross sales of such business in any one month period; or (2) unapproved
industrial hemp products in any quantity or amount.
F. “Storing” means to store unprocessed industrial hemp.
G. “Testing” means a laboratory, facility, or entity in the state that offers or
performs tests of industrial hemp and industrial hemp products.
SECTION 3. Moratorium Extended
The City of Moorpark hereby extends the current moratorium on the cultivation,
manufacturing, testing, retail sale, and storing of industrial hemp. Cultivation,
manufacturing, testing, retail sale, and storing of industrial hemp shall all constitute
prohibited uses under Title 17 of the Moorpark Municipal Code and no building permit,
11
Ordinance No. ____
Page 5
business regulatory permit, zoning clearance, or other entitlement may be issued for the
purposes of authorizing such uses.
SECTION 4. Penalty
A violation of any provision of this Interim Ordinance shall constitute a violation of
the Municipal Code and is subject to all applicable penalties, fines, and remedies
described in Chapter 1.10 of the Moorpark Municipal Code. Each and every day a
violation of this Interim Ordinance exists shall constitute a separate and distinct violation
of the Municipal Code.
SECTION 5. Term of Moratorium
This Interim Ordinance shall expire, and the moratorium established hereby shall
terminate on December 16, 2020, which is 10 months, 15 days after the expiration date
of the initial 45-day moratorium established by Interim Urgency Ordinance No. 477 on
December 18, 2019, unless extended by the City Council at a noticed public hearing
pursuant to California Government Code Section 65858. Alternatively, the City Council
may terminate the Interim Ordinance prior to its expiration date of December 16, 2020
upon the adoption of a permanent ordinance that regulates industrial hemp activities.
SECTION 6. Investigation and Report During Term of Moratorium
During the term of this Interim Ordinance, the Community Development Director
is directed to continue studying appropriate regulatory tools to mitigate the conditions
outlined in Section 1 that arise out of the cultivation, manufacturing, testing, retail sale,
and storing of industrial hemp, including but not limited to the prohibition of all such
uses. The Community Development Director is further directed to report back to the
City Council with his or her findings and a proposed ordinance to implement the
recommended course of action.
SECTION 7. Effective Date; Findings of Urgency; and Duration
A. This Interim Ordinance is adopted as an urgency ordinance pursuant to
the provisions of Government Code Sections 65858, 36934 and 36937, and shall take
effect immediately upon its adoption. Based upon the findings set forth in Section 1
above, the City Council finds and determines that the adoption of this Interim Ordinance
is an urgency ordinance authorized by Government Code Section 65858, and is
necessary for the immediate preservation of the public health, safety, and welfare.
B. Pursuant to Government Code Section 65858(a), this Interim Ordinance
shall be adopted by not less than a four-fifths vote of the City Council and shall be in
12
Ordinance No. ____
Page 6
effect for 10 months, 15 days from February 1, 2020. The City Council may extend the
Interim Ordinance for up to an additional one year, if necessary. The Community
Development Director and the City Clerk’s office shall undertake all actions legally
necessary to extend this Interim Ordinance in the event the studies and reports desired
by the City Council will not be concluded on or before December 16, 2020.
SECTION 8. Severability
If any provision of this Interim Ordinance, the application thereof to any person or
circumstance, or the moratorium on any of the specific uses of industrial hemp is held
invalid, such invalidity shall not affect other provisions, moratoria, or applications of this
Interim Ordinance which can be given effect without the invalid provision or application,
and to this end the provisions of this ordinance are severable. The City Council hereby
declares that it would have adopted this Interim Ordinance irrespective of the invalidity
of any particular portion thereof.
SECTION 9. Publication and Certification
The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this ordinance; shall
enter the same in the book of original ordinances of said City; shall make a minute of the
passage and adoption thereof in the records of the proceedings of the City Council at
which the same is passed and adopted; and shall publish notice of adoption in the
manner required by law.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 15th day of January, 2020.
Janice S. Parvin, Mayor
ATTEST:
Ky Spangler, City Clerk
13
ATTACHMENT 2
RESOLUTION NO. 2020-____
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA, INITIATING A ZONING CODE
AMENDMENT AND DIRECTING THE PLANNING
COMMISSION TO HOLD A PUBLIC HEARING AND
PROVIDE A RECOMMENDATION TO THE CITY COUNCIL
ON AMENDMENTS TO TITLE 17 (ZONING) OF THE
MOORPARK MUNICIPAL CODE TO ADDRESS THE
CULTIVATION, MANUFACTURING, TESTING, STORING,
AND RETAIL SALE OF INDUSTRIAL HEMP AND
DETERMINING THAT THIS ACTION IS NOT A PROJECT
SUBJECT TO THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL
QUALITY ACT
WHEREAS, Section 17.44.050 of the Moorpark Municipal Code provides that the
City Council may initiate proceedings to consider amendments to the Zoning Code by the
adoption of a resolution of intent; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has established a moratorium on the cultivation,
manufacturing, testing, storing, and certain retail sales of industrial hemp, which is currently
scheduled to expire on December 16, 2020; and
WHEREAS, in adopting the interim ordinances that established the current
moratorium on the above-referenced industrial hemp uses, the City Council directed City
staff to take all actions necessary to prepare an ordinance that amends the Zoning Code to
codify permanent regulations of industrial hemp uses; and
WHEREAS, consistent with its prior direction, the City Council now desires to initiate
proceedings to amend Title 17 of the Moorpark Municipal Code (Zoning) to address
industrial hemp uses within the City; and
WHEREAS, the Community Development Director has determined that the initiation
of proceedings for a Zoning Code Amendment is not a “project” as defined under the
California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) because the initiation of a proposed
amendment to the Zoning Code itself does not have the possibility of having a direct or
indirect physical change on the environment (State CEQA Guidelines Section 15378
(b)(5)).
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK DOES
HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION: The City Council concurs
with the Community Development Director’s determination that the initiation of proceedings
for a Zoning Code Amendment is not a project subject to CEQA and, therefore, no further
environmental review pursuant to CEQA is required.
14
Resolution 2020-____
Page 2
SECTION 2. INITIATION OF PROCEEDINGS: The City Council hereby institutes
proceedings to consider a Zoning Code Amendment that would amend Title 17 ( Zoning) of
the Moorpark Municipal Code to establish zoning regulations and limitations on the
cultivation, manufacturing, testing, storing, and sale of industrial hemp.
SECTION 3. DIRECTION TO PLANNING DIRECTOR: The Community
Development Director is hereby directed to continue her and her staff’s research and
analysis of appropriate regulations and limitations on the uses of industrial hemp and to
prepare an ordinance that best addresses the impacts in light of the City Council’s findings
that supported the current moratorium on industrial hemp uses.
SECTION 4. DIRECTION TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION: The Planning
Commission is hereby directed to study, hold a public hearing, and a provide a
recommendation to the City Council on this matter.
SECTION 5 The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of the Resolution and
shall cause a certified resolution to be filed in the book of original Resolutions.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 15th day of January, 2020.
_____________________________________
Janice S. Parvin, Mayor
ATTEST:
________________________________
Ky Spangler, City Clerk
15
REPORT ON THE MEASURES TAKEN TO ALLEVIATE
THE CONDITIONS WHICH LED THE CITY OF MOORPARK
TO ENACT INTERIM URGENCY ORDINANCE NO. 477 ON
DECEMBER 18, 2019 TO IMPOSE A MORATORIUM ON THE
CULTIVATION, MANUFACTURING, TESTING, STORING, AND
CERTAIN RETAIL SALES OF INDUSTRIAL HEMP
ISSUED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK
ON JANUARY 2, 2020 PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE
SECTION 65858(d)
Background:
On December 18, 2019, pursuant to Government Code Section 65858, the Moorpark
City Council enacted an Interim Urgency Ordinance to impose a moratorium on the
cultivation, manufacturing, testing, storing, and certain retail sales of industrial hemp.
Absent any additional action, the Interim Urgency Ordinance will expire after 45 days
(February 1, 2020). However, staff anticipates additional time will be necessary to
thoroughly research and evaluate a permanent, non-urgency ordinance establishing
zoning regulations and other restrictions on the cultivation, manufacturing, testing, sale,
and storing of industrial hemp. City staff has therefore scheduled and will notice a
public hearing for January 15, 2020, to extend the Interim Urgency Ordinance from
February 1, 2020 for an additional 10 months and 15 days, through and including
December 16, 2020.
Reasons for 45-Day Interim Ordinance and Its Extension:
The 45-Day Interim Ordinance was adopted for the following reasons:
A. Cultivation, Manufacturing, Testing and Storing of Industrial Hemp.
Over the last several months, large numbers of residents in the Peach Hill, Mountain
Meadows, Serenata and other areas and neighborhoods in the southern portion of the
City have experienced offensive odors from relatively new and large-scale outdoor
industrial hemp farms located in the Tierra Rejada Valley located immediately south of
the City in the unincorporated area of the County of Ventura. Dozens of residents have
called City and County officials complaining of the continual skunk-like odor in their
neighborhoods as terpenes from a large farm of industrial hemp grown to produce CBD
oil wafts into residential neighborhoods adjacent to this hemp farm. Aside from having
to experience offensive odors, many of these residents also have complained of
headaches, nausea, sore throats and other physical side effects from breathing and
smelling the distinctive odor generated by industrial hemp grown to produce CBD oil.
Additional concerns were raised about the volatile organic compounds (VOC) generated
by industrial hemp plants and whether large-scale production of industrial hemp could
lead to the increased generation of smog-producing ozone in Ventura County.
ATTACHMENT 3
16
Ten-Day Report - Ordinance No. 477
Page 2
Public safety concerns were also raised. Ventura County Sheriff’s Captain and
Moorpark Chief of Police Victor Fazio, reported on the increased number of crimes
committed by persons seeking to steal industrial hemp plants from open and unsecured
fields, the collateral crimes committed in the course of those thefts, and the criminal
element that is being attracted into Ventura County to take advantage of these
opportunities for theft.
B. CBD Products
After the 2018 Farm Bill was signed into law, the Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”)
released a statement stating that it is unlawful under the Food, Drug, and Cosmetics Act
(“FD&C”) to introduce food containing added CBD into interstate commerce, or to
market CBD products as, or in, dietary supplements, regardless of whether the CBD
was derived from industrial hemp or from cannabis. Similarly, the California Department
of Public Health released a statement explaining that the use of industrial hemp as the
source of CBD to be added to food products is prohibited. The California Department of
Public Health explained that until the FDA rules that industrial hemp-derived CBD oil
and CBD products can be used as a food or California makes a determination that they
are safe to use for human and animal consumption, CBD products are not an approved
food, food ingredient, food additive, or dietary supplement. The FDA has approved only
one CBD product, Epidiolex, a prescription drug product to treat two rare, severe forms
of epilepsy. The moratorium will not ban the sale of Epidiolex.
Under the FD&C, any product intended to have a therapeutic or medical use, and any
product (other than a food) that is intended to affect the structure or function of the body
of humans or animals, is a drug. Drugs must generally either receive premarket
approval by the FDA through the New Drug Application process or conform to a
"monograph" for a particular drug category, as established by FDA's Over-the-Counter
(“OTC”) Drug Review. CBD is not an ingredient considered under the OTC drug review.
An unapproved new drug cannot be distributed or sold in interstate commerce. There
are no FDA approved products that contain CBD other than Epidiolex. Therefore, the
sale of CBD products that are intended to have a therapeutic or medical use is a
violation of federal law, and as discussed below, can pose a significant risk to the
public. In addition, the FDA has concluded that CBD cannot be sold as a dietary
supplement.
The FDA has also concluded that it is a prohibited act to introduce or deliver for
introduction into interstate commerce any food (including any animal food or feed) to
which CBD has been added.1 Unlike the FDA-approved CBD drug product, unapproved
CBD products, which could include unapproved drugs, cosmetics, foods, and products
marketed as dietary supplements, have not been subject to FDA evaluation regarding
whether they are effective to treat a particular disease or have other effects that may be
1 Ingredients that are derived from industrial hemp that do not contain THC or CBD might be able to be
added to food. In December 2018, the FDA determined that hulled hemp seed, hemp seed protein
powder, and hemp seed oil can be legally marketed in human foods for consumption as marketers do not
make claims that they treat disease. These products do not fall within the City’s categorical ban.
17
Ten-Day Report - Ordinance No. 477
Page 3
claimed. In addition, they have not been evaluated by the FDA to determine what the
proper dosage is, how they could interact with other drugs or foods, or whether they
have dangerous side effects or other safety concerns. Misleading, unproven, or false
claims associated with CBD products may lead consumers to put off getting important
medical care, such as proper diagnosis, treatment, and supportive care, which is a real
public health and safety concern.
The FDA notes that it has seen only limited data about CBD safety and the data points
to real risks that need to be considered before taking CBD for any reason. According to
the FDA, CBD has the potential to cause liver injury, and can affect the metabolism of
other drugs, causing serious side effects. Use of CBD with alcohol or other Central
Nervous System depressants increases the risk of sedation and drowsiness, which can
lead to injuries. CBD can also cause changes in alertness, most commonly
experienced as drowsiness or sleepiness, gastrointestinal distress, most commonly
experienced as diarrhea and/or decreased appetite, and changes in mood, most
commonly experienced as irritability and agitation.
In addition to safety risks and unproven claims, the quality of many CBD products may
also be in question. The FDA has raised concerns about the lack of appropriate
processing controls and practices that can put consumers at additional risk. For
example, the FDA has tested the chemical content of cannabinoid compounds in some
of the products, and many were found to not contain the levels of CBD they claimed.
The FDA is also investigating reports of CBD potentially containing unsafe levels of
contaminants (e.g., pesticides, heavy metals, and THC).
A cosmetic is defined in Section 201(i) of the FD&C Act as "(1) articles intended to be
rubbed, poured, sprinkled, or sprayed on, introduced into, or otherwise applied to the
human body or any part thereof for cleansing, beautifying, promoting attractiveness, or
altering the appearance, and (2) articles intended for use as a component of any such
articles; except that such term shall not include soap." Under the FD&C Act, cosmetic
products and ingredients are not subject to premarket approval by FDA, except for most
color additives. Ingredients not specifically addressed by regulation must nonetheless
comply with all applicable requirements, and no ingredient – including a cannabis or
cannabis-derived ingredient – can be used in a cosmetic if it causes the product to be
adulterated or misbranded in any way. A cosmetic generally is adulterated if it bears or
contains any poisonous or deleterious substance which may render it injurious to users
under the conditions of use prescribed in the labeling, or under such conditions of use
as are customary or usage. If a product is intended to affect the structure or function of
the body, or to diagnose, cure, mitigate, treat or prevent disease, it is a drug, or possibly
both a cosmetic and a drug, even if it affects the appearance.
As part of staff’s comprehensive investigation of industrial hemp and its potential
impacts on public health, safety, and welfare, staff will also evaluate whether and to
what extent retail sales of CBD products contribute to any such health and safety
impacts.
18
Ten-Day Report - Ordinance No. 477
Page 4
C. Hemp Retail Stores
Other cities in Ventura County have also seen an increase in stores specializing in the
sale of hemp products, such as CBD. In order to comprehensively review the
appropriateness of this type of focused retail store to be located in the City and in
certain types of commercial districts of the City, the City wants to consider a range of
zoning and other regulatory options that may pertain to these types of retail stores. The
City also wants to study a potential exemption for certain types of hemp products from
the definition of what would constitute a non-permissible hemp store.
Based on these and other concerns expressed by the public and described in the staff
report for the December 18, 2019, City Council meeting, the City Council adopted
Ordinance No. 477 to impose a moratorium on: (1) the cultivation, manufacturing,
testing and storing of industrial hemp in the City; (2) the retail sale of unapproved CBD
products; and (3) the establishment of hemp stores in the City.
Measures Taken to Alleviate the Conditions Which Led to the Adoption of the
Ordinance:
The County of Ventura has proposed an interim ordinance to create a one-
half mile buffer between sensitive receptors and industrial hemp cultivation
activities carried out in unincorporated County land. The County’s proposed
interim Ordinance will be considered at an upcoming Board meeting on
January 14, 2020. The City has submitted a letter asking that the County
develop a science-based standard for separation between residences and
other sensitive uses and hemp cultivation areas. The City is concerned that
with wind patterns, both on-shore and off-shore flows, the separation needed
to ensure that residents are not subjected to objectionable odors may need to
be greater than one-half mile. City staff intends to attend the upcoming
County Board meeting and provide input into the Board’s decision.
City staff has been conferring with the Ventura County Sheriff’s Department in
order to better understand the causes of additional criminal activity
surrounding industrial hemp activities and what type of security measures are
needed to avoid hemp farms from being a magnet for criminal theft of hemp
plants.
City staff has been monitoring and researching the current regulatory
environment surrounding CBD products that have not yet been approved for
human consumption by the Federal Drug Administration. Staff is undertaking
this research to determine whether, in the absence of a robust and well-
understood federal regulatory program, municipal permanent restrictions on
CBD productions are appropriate.
City staff has begun researching permanent amendments to the Municipal
Code to codify the moratorium’s prohibitions on industrial hemp activities,
19
Ten-Day Report - Ordinance No. 477
Page 5
including prohibitions on the cultivation, manufacturing, testing and storing or
industrial hemp in the City.
City staff is also researching whether the Interim Ordinance ban on what are
effectively hemp stores (retail stores with at least five percent of its floor area
or five percent of its gross sales from hemp projects) is needed to protect the
community from the unregulated sale of hemp products. Staff will be
evaluating the percentage threshold for the ban and also whether additional
exemptions for certain hemp products are appropriate.
Assuming the City Council elects to extend the Interim Urgency Ordinance,
and thereafter, amendments to the Moorpark Municipal Code were to be
approved by the City Council, staff would at that time recommend rescinding
the Interim Urgency Ordinance upon the effective date of the new regulations
prior to December 16, 2020.
20
MOORPARK CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA REPORT
TO: Honorable City Council
FROM: Troy Brown, City Manager
Kevin G. Ennis, City Attorney
Nicholas R. Ghirelli, Assistant City Attorney
DATE : 12/18/2019 Regular Meeting
SUBJECT: Consider Adoption on an Urgency Ordinance to Prohibit the
Cultivation, Manufacturing, Testing, Storing, and Certain Sales of
Industrial Hemp in the City of Moorpark, Declaring the Urgency
Thereof and the Immediate Effectiveness of the Ordinance
Pursuant to Government Code Section 65858, 36934 and 36937,
and Making a Determination of Exemption under the California
Environmental Quality Act
INTRODUCTION
Staff has prepared a proposed urgency ordinance to impose a moratorium on the
cultivation, manufacturing, testing, and storing of industrial hemp, among other related
activities such as drying and processing industrial hemp, in all zoning districts of the City.
The urgency ordinance also prohibits the sale of products that contain cannabidiols
(“CBD”), if the sale of those products requires FDA approval and the products do not have
such approval. In addition, the urgency ordinance prohibits the sale of all industrial hemp
products, if the sale comprises five percent or more of a business’s floor area or gross
sales in any month. The proposed urgency ordinance would prohibit issuance of zoning
permits, building permits, land use entitlements and business registration permits for any of
those activities within the City of Moorpark for an initial 45-day period. If this urgency
ordinance is adopted, City staff will take other necessary actions required by state law to
permit the City Council to extend that moratorium for another 10 months and 15 days at its
January 15, 2020 City Council meeting and to begin the preparation of permanent
regulations during the pendency of the moratorium. A special meeting is expected to be
called for Tuesday, January 2, 2020, for the City Council’s consideration of a report that
briefly explains the measures taken to alleviate the problems caused by industrial hemp.
This report must be adopted by the City Council 10 days prior to any extension of the
urgency ordinance.
Item: 9.A.
ATTACHMENT 4
21
Honorable City Council
12/18/2019 Regular Meeting
Page 2
BACKGROUND
Over the last several months, large numbers of residents in the Peach Hill, Mountain
Meadows, Serenata and other areas and neighborhoods in the southern portion of the City
have experienced offensive odors from relatively new and large-scale outdoor industrial
hemp farms located in the Tierra Rejada Valley located immediately south of the City in the
unincorporated area of the County of Ventura. Dozens of residents have called City and
County officials complaining of the continual skunk-like odor in their neighborhoods as
terpenes from a large farm of industrial hemp grown to produce CBD oil wafts into
residential neighborhoods adjacent to this hemp farm. Aside from having to experience
offensive odors, many of these residents also have complained of headaches, nausea,
sore throats and other physical side effects from breathing and smelling the distinctive odor
generated by industrial hemp grown to produce CBD oil.
On Tuesday, November 19, 2019, the Ventura County Board of Supervisors held a special
meeting at the Moorpark Community Center to hear from residents who are experiencing
these odors. At this standing-room only meeting, a large number of residents voiced their
complaints and raised a series of questions about the problems associated with industrial
hemp grown close to residents. At the conclusion of that meeting, the City was informed
that the County Board of Supervisors provided direction to County staff to bring back a
draft moratorium on the issuance of new industrial hemp permits and to develop
permanent regulations to avoid or lessen the impacts of hemp farms on nearby residents.
On December 10, 2019, the Board of Supervisors unanimously approved an urgency
ordinance to establish a one-half mile buffer zone between industrial hemp farms and
sensitive receptors, including residential uses.
On Wednesday, November 20, 2019, the Moorpark City Council received a presentation
from the County’s Agricultural Commissioner, Ed Williams, and his Deputy, about industrial
hemp cultivation and permitting in Ventura County. At the meeting, residents and
Councilmembers posed a series of questions about the process of permitting hemp farms
and potential solutions to address the impacts on the community. Ventura County Sheriff
Captain Fazio also detailed a series of public safety issues generated by the outdoor and
open cultivation of industrial hemp.
At the conclusion of that discussion, the Council directed that an item be placed on this
City Council agenda that would allow the City Council to address the current and
immediate threat to the public health, safety and welfare caused by the cultivation of
industrial hemp and to allow the City Council to adopt as an urgency measure an interim
ordinance prohibiting industrial hemp cultivation in the City.
22
Honorable City Council
12/18/2019 Regular Meeting
Page 3
DISCUSSION
A. Background
“Industrial hemp” is defined as “a fiber or oilseed crop, or both, that is limited to types of the
plant Cannabis sativa L. having no more than three-tenths of one percent (0.3%)
tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) contained in the dried flowering tops, whether growing or not;
the seeds of the plant; the resin extracted from any part of the plant; and every compound,
manufacture, salt, derivative, mixture, or preparation of the plant, its seeds or resin
produced therefrom.” In contrast, traditional cannabis, also known generally as marijuana,
has a THC content that exceeds 3/10th of one percent in its flowering tops, seeds or resin.
Industrial hemp is grown to produce a variety of products, including fiber for clothing,
textiles, paper, building materials and for CBD oil for human use and consumption.
Cannabis is principally grown for the psychoactive properties of THC when ingested.
Industrial hemp and cannabis are regulated differently under federal and state law.
On December 20, 2018, the Agricultural Improvement Act of 2018 (also known as the 2018
Farm Bill) was signed into law by the President of the United States. Effective January 1,
2018, that law removed industrial hemp from Schedule I of the federal Controlled
Substances Act and directed the U.S. Agricultural Department to develop a federal
regulatory oversight program for the cultivation, production and marketing of industrial
hemp.
Similarly, the California state government enacted a regulatory program to allow for the
cultivation of industrial hemp in California. Under that program, growers of industrial hemp
for commercial purposes must register with the county agricultural commissions and obtain
an annual permit. (See, generally, California Food and Agricultural Code Section 81000 et
seq. and Title 3 of the California Code of Regulations, Section 4900 et seq.)
B. Impacts on City
In the last year, Ventura County has become an increasingly popular area for the growing
of industrial hemp because of the County’s unique climate that allows for the year-round
and staggered growing of industrial hemp crops. The Ventura County Agricultural
Commissioner informed the City Council on November 20, 2019, that so far in 2019, the
County has issued permits to 47 applicants seeking to cultivate industrial hemp on 110
sites covering approximately 3,600 acres of land. Each permit is valid for one year. Of
those, most were issued for the cultivation of industrial hemp for the production of CBD oil.
The specific cultivar of industrial hemp that is grown to produce CBD oil is a cultivar that
produces a large amount of flowering resin. This flowering resin produces a smell or
terpene that is often described as having the strong odor of marijuana or, to some, the
smell of a skunk.
23
Honorable City Council
12/18/2019 Regular Meeting
Page 4
In the last year, a large farm area in the Tierra Rejada Valley just south of the City was
planted to grow industrial hemp. The specific type of cultivar planted to produce CBD oil
combined with the large acreage of hemp plants planted for staggered harvesting over
many months of the year has caused significant and pervasive foul orders to infiltrate the
southern portion of the City of Moorpark.
Dozens of residents in the affected area have described the impacts as being a nuisance.
Impacts include constant exposure to offensive odors, inside and outside their homes.
Many residents indicated that they are now inhibited from enjoying the outdoor areas
around their homes and from using passive and active recreation areas in their
neighborhoods. Many residents have reported headaches, nausea, and sore throats.
Given the strong and pervasive odor in the neighborhood, residents are concerned about
the potential diminution in the value of their homes and whether prospective purchasers of
homes in the area would be driven away by the pervasive and strong odor. Staff is
informed that the County’s recently adopted urgency ordinance is expected to prevent
industrial hemp farming in the Tierra Rejada Valley.
Additional concerns were raised about the volatile organic compounds (VOC) generated by
industrial hemp plants and whether large-scale production of industrial hemp could lead to
the increased generation of smog-producing ozone in Ventura County.
Public safety concerns were also raised. Ventura County Sheriff’s Captain Victor Fazio,
reported on the increased number of crimes committed by persons seeking to steal
industrial hemp plants from open and unsecured fields, the collateral crimes committed in
the course of those thefts, and the criminal element that is being attracted into Ventura
County to take advantage of these opportunities for theft.
Based on this information and all the evidence presented to the City Council in the prior
meetings on this issue, staff believes that the cultivation, manufacturing, testing, sale, and
storing of industrial hemp poses a current and immediate threat to the public health, safety
and welfare of the community. Allowing for cultivation of industrial hemp in the City could
create similar and additional impacts from those noted in this report. Adoption of the
proposed interim ordinance is necessary to prohibit the cultivation, manufacturing, testing,
sale, and storing of industrial hemp in the City because any those activities may be in
conflict with zoning and municipal code regulations that the City may want to adopt over
the next several months. Moreover, given the reported incidents of theft of industrial hemp,
all industrial hemp activities should be prohibited. City staff will study appropriate
regulatory tools to address these impacts, including a permanent prohibition on industrial
hemp activities within the City, during the moratorium period. In addition, staff will prepare
an ordinance to implement those tools.
24
Honorable City Council
12/18/2019 Regular Meeting
Page 5
C. CBD Products
After the 2018 Farm Bill was signed into law, the Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”)
released a statement stating that it is unlawful under the Food, Drug, and Cosmetics Act
(“FD&C”) to introduce food containing added CBD into interstate commerce, or to market
CBD products as, or in, dietary supplements, regardless of whether the CBD was derived
from industrial hemp or from cannabis. Similarly, the California Department of Public
Health released a statement explaining that the use of industrial hemp as the source of
CBD to be added to food products is prohibited. The California Department of Public
Health explained that until the FDA rules that industrial hemp-derived CBD oil and CBD
products can be used as a food or California makes a determination that they are safe to
use for human and animal consumption, CBD products are not an approved food, food
ingredient, food additive, or dietary supplement. The FDA has approved only one CBD
product, Epidiolex, a prescription drug product to treat two rare, severe forms of epilepsy.
The moratorium will not ban the sale of Epidiolex.
Under the FD&C, any product intended to have a therapeutic or medical use, and any
product (other than a food) that is intended to affect the structure or function of the body of
humans or animals, is a drug. Drugs must generally either receive premarket approval by
the FDA through the New Drug Application process or conform to a "monograph" for a
particular drug category, as established by FDA's Over-the-Counter (“OTC”) Drug Review.
CBD is not an ingredient considered under the OTC drug review. An unapproved new drug
cannot be distributed or sold in interstate commerce. There are no FDA approved
products that contain CBD other than Epidiolex. Therefore, the sale of CBD products that
are intended to have a therapeutic or medical use is a violation of federal law, and as
discussed below, can pose a significant risk to the public. In addition, the FDA has
concluded that CBD cannot be sold as a dietary supplement.
The FDA has also concluded that it is a prohibited act to introduce or deliver for
introduction into interstate commerce any food (including any animal food or feed) to which
CBD has been added.1 Unlike the FDA-approved CBD drug product, unapproved CBD
products, which could include unapproved drugs, cosmetics, foods, and products marketed
as dietary supplements, have not been subject to FDA evaluation regarding whether they
are effective to treat a particular disease or have other effects that may be claimed. In
addition, they have not been evaluated by the FDA to determine what the proper dosage is,
how they could interact with other drugs or foods, or whether they have dangerous side
effects or other safety concerns. Misleading, unproven, or false claims associated with
CBD products may lead consumers to put off getting important medical care, such as
proper diagnosis, treatment, and supportive care, which is a real public health and safety
concern.
1 Ingredients that are derived from industrial hemp that do not contain THC or CBD might be able to be
added to food. In December 2018, the FDA determined that hulled hemp seed, hemp seed protein
powder, and hemp seed oil can be legally marketed in human foods for consumption as marketers do not
make claims that they treat disease. These products do not fall within the City’s categorical ban.
25
Honorable City Council
12/18/2019 Regular Meeting
Page 6
The FDA notes that it has seen only limited data about CBD safety and the data points to
real risks that need to be considered before taking CBD for any reason. According to the
FDA, CBD has the potential to cause liver injury, and can affect the metabolism of other
drugs, causing serious side effects. Use of CBD with alcohol or other Central Nervous
System depressants increases the risk of sedation and drowsiness, which can lead to
injuries. CBD can also cause changes in alertness, most commonly experienced as
drowsiness or sleepiness, gastrointestinal distress, most commonly experienced as
diarrhea and/or decreased appetite, and changes in mood, most commonly experienced as
irritability and agitation.
In addition to safety risks and unproven claims, the quality of many CBD products may also
be in question. The FDA has raised concerns about the lack of appropriate processing
controls and practices that can put consumers at additional risk. For example, the FDA
has tested the chemical content of cannabinoid compounds in some of the products, and
many were found to not contain the levels of CBD they claimed. The FDA is also
investigating reports of CBD potentially containing unsafe levels of contaminants (e.g.,
pesticides, heavy metals, and THC).
A cosmetic is defined in Section 201(i) of the FD&C Act as "(1) articles intended to be
rubbed, poured, sprinkled, or sprayed on, introduced into, or otherwise applied to the
human body or any part thereof for cleansing, beautifying, promoting attractiveness, or
altering the appearance, and (2) articles intended for use as a component of any such
articles; except that such term shall not include soap." Under the FD&C Act, cosmetic
products and ingredients are not subject to premarket approval by FDA, except for most
color additives. Ingredients not specifically addressed by regulation must nonetheless
comply with all applicable requirements, and no ingredient – including a cannabis or
cannabis-derived ingredient – can be used in a cosmetic if it causes the product to be
adulterated or misbranded in any way. A cosmetic generally is adulterated if it bears or
contains any poisonous or deleterious substance which may render it injurious to users
under the conditions of use prescribed in the labeling, or under such conditions of use as
are customary or usage. If a product is intended to affect the structure or function of the
body, or to diagnose, cure, mitigate, treat or prevent disease, it is a drug, or possibly both a
cosmetic and a drug, even if it affects the appearance.
As part of staff’s comprehensive investigation of industrial hemp and its potential impacts
on public health, safety, and welfare, staff will also evaluate whether and to what extent
retail sales of CBD products contribute to any such health and safety impacts.
INTERIM ORDINANCE PROCEDURES
California law authorizes municipalities to adopt “interim” ordinances that place an
immediate moratorium on the establishment of specified new activities and uses in the
City. California Government Code Section 65858 provides for the procedures and
requirements for the adoption of an “interim” ordinance.
26
Honorable City Council
12/18/2019 Regular Meeting
Page 7
Section 65858 provides that, without following normal zoning code ordinance adoption
procedures, a city council may, in order to protect the public health, safety, and welfare of
the community, adopt as an urgency measure an “interim ordinance” prohibiting any uses
that may be in conflict with a contemplated general plan, specific plan, or zoning proposal
that the City Council, Planning Commission or Planning Department is considering or
studying for adoption within a reasonable time.
Section 65858 provides that a city council cannot adopt an interim ordinance unless the
ordinance contains legislative findings that there is a current and immediate threat to the
public health, safety, or welfare, and that the approval of additional entitlements for a
specific use or uses would result in a threat to the public health, safety, or welfare.
Adoption of the interim ordinance requires a 4/5ths vote of the City Council. If one member
of the City Council is absent from the City Council meeting, a unanimous vote in favor of
adoption of the Ordinance by the remaining four members is required to adopt the
Ordinance. A motion to waive full reading and adopt the proposed Urgency Ordinance as
read by title will require a roll call vote. If that motion passes, the Urgency Ordinance will
go into effect immediately and would remain in effect for a period of forty-five (45) days,
pursuant to Government Code section 65858(a), unless further extended by the City
Council.
If the Urgency Ordinance is adopted, it will remain in effect for an initial 45-day period (until
January 18, 2020.) Prior to that expiration, the City Council may extend the interim
ordinance by an additional 10 months and 15 days by the adoption of an additional
urgency ordinance. Any extension shall also require a four-fifths vote for adoption. This
means that if the City Council wants the interim ordinance to extend past January 18, 2020,
the City Council will need to extend the Ordinance at its January 15, 2020 City Council
meeting. In order to allow for that potential extension, City Staff is required to prepare a
written report pursuant to Government Code Section 65858(d) which describes the
measure taken by the City to alleviate the condition that led to the adoption of the
ordinance. This written report is required to be issued by the City Council at least 10 days
prior to extension of the interim ordinance. As the City Council will not have a meeting the
first week of January (due to the January 1, 2020 holiday), and the extension of the
ordinance will need to occur at the January 15, 2020 Regular City Council Meeting, the City
Council will need to act to approve and issue that written report at a special meeting
scheduled for Thursday, January 2, 2019..
Aside from the written report, City Staff will also provide 10-day advance notice of a public
hearing on January 15, 2020 at which meeting the City Council will consider an ordinance
to extend the interim ordinance by 10 months and 15 days.
Finally, if the City has not been able to enact permanent zoning and other limitations during
that extension period, the law allows for one additional one-year extension, for a total
cumulative duration of the interim restrictions of two years.
27
Honorable City Council
12/18/2019 Regular Meeting
Page 8
Concurrently with the interim ordinance process, City staff will begin the process of
preparing permanent zoning and other regulations and then process those through the
normal zoning ordinance adoption process. That process will include a noticed public
hearing before the Planning Commission, the Planning Commission’s adoption of a
resolution making recommendations on the proposed text of a permanent ordinance to the
City Council, a noticed public hearing before the City Council and the regular two reading
processing for adoption of a non-urgency ordinance by the City Council.
CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT
This interim ordinance is exempt from review under the California Environmental Quality
Act (CEQA) on several grounds.
This interim ordinance is categorically exempt from CEQA, under Section 15308 of the
State CEQA Guidelines, because this ordinance is a regulatory action taken by the City in
accordance with California Government Code Section 65858 to assure maintenance and
protection of the environment pending further review of the potential impacts of industrial
hemp uses in the City and completion of contemplated Zoning Ordinance revisions.
In addition, this interim ordinance is not a “project” within the meaning of Section 15378 of
the State CEQA Guidelines, because it has no potential to result in a direct physical
change in the environment, and it has no potential to result in any reasonably foreseeable
indirect physical change in the environment. The interim ordinance will impose greater
limitations on development in the City than under the current Zoning Code because the
moratorium will temporarily halt the cultivation, manufacturing, testing, and storing of
industrial hemp, the sale of products contains CBD if the sale of those products requires
FDA approval and have not obtained that approval, and the sale of industrial hemp
products if such products comprise five percent or more of a business’s floor space or
gross sales in any one month. The interim ordinance will thereby serve to reduce
potentially significant adverse environmental impacts caused by those activities in the City.
Finally, this interim ordinance is exempt from CEQA review pursuant to Section
15061(b)(3) of the State CEQA Guidelines. This interim ordinance is covered by the
general rule that CEQA applies only to projects that have the potential to cause a
significant effect on the environment. Because the interim ordinance will impose a
moratorium on cultivation, manufacturing, testing, and storing of industrial hemp, as well as
the sale of products containing CBD, if the sale of those products requires FDA approval
and have not obtained that approval, and the sale of industrial hemp products if such
products comprise five percent or more of a business’s floor space or gross sales in any
one month, it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that this ordinance will
have a significant effect on the environment, and therefore, this interim ordinance is not
subject to CEQA.
28
Honorable City Council
12/18/2019 Regular Meeting
Page 9
FISCAL IMPACT
There is no fiscal impact associated with this action.
COUNCIL GOAL COMPLIANCE
This action does not support a current strategic directive.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
1.Waive full reading and adopt Urgency Ordinance No. ___ as read by title only.
(REQUIRES A ROLL CALL VOTE AND A 4/5THS VOTE OF THE CITY COUNCIL
TO ADOPT); and
2.Direct City staff to prepare a written report of the steps taken to address the impacts
of industrial hemp on the community and have that report presented at a Special
City Council meeting on January 2, 2020; and
3.Provide Notice of a Public Hearing for January 15, 2020, to consider the extension
of Urgency Ordinance No. ___; and
4.Direct staff to begin the preparation of a non-urgency permanent Ordinance
establishing zoning and other necessary restrictions on the cultivation,
manufacturing, testing, and storing of industrial hemp in the City; and
5.Direct staff to begin the preparation of a non-urgency permanent Ordinance
establishing zoning and other necessary restrictions on the sale of products
containing CBD, if the sale of those products requires FDA approval, and the
products do not have such approval. (ROLL CALL VOTE REQUIRED)
Attachment: Draft Urgency Ordinance No. ____
29
ORDINANCE NO. ___
AN INTERIM URGENCY ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF
MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING A
MORATORIUM ON THE CULTIVATION,
MANUFACTURING, TESTING, RETAIL SALE, AND
STORING OF INDUSTRIAL HEMP, DECLARING THE
URGENCY THEREOF AND THE IMMEDIATE
EFFECTIVENESS OF THIS ORDINANCE PURSUANT TO
GOVERNMENT CODE SECTIONS 65858, 36934 AND
36937 AND MAKING A DETERMINATION OF EXEMPTION
UNDER THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
ACT
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK DOES ORDAIN AS
FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. Findings
A. The City Council desires to provide for the public safety, health and
welfare of the residents and visitors to the City of Moorpark (“City”) by exercising its
police power authority under Section 7 of Article XI of the California Constitution. Based
on the findings and evidence set forth below, the City Council finds that certain uses of
industrial hemp may create public safety, health and welfare impacts within the City.
These activities include the cultivation, manufacturing, testing, retail sale, and storing of
industrial hemp. At this time, industrial hemp uses are not specifically listed for
regulation by Municipal Code Chapter 17.20 (Uses by Zone).
B. The City finds that the public welfare will be harmed without studying and
evaluating the impacts associated with industrial hemp, including odor, processing
safety, and the generation of air pollutants, such as volatile organic compounds (VOCs).
Dozens of residents have called City and County of Ventura (“County”) officials
complaining of the continual skunk-like odor in their neighborhoods as terpenes from a
large farm of industrial hemp grown to produce CBD oil wafts into residential
neighborhoods adjacent to this hemp farm. During public hearings regarding industrial
hemp, the City Council heard from a substantial number of individuals regarding the
harmful effects of the odor emanating from industrial hemp cultivation located adjacent
to the City in unincorporated areas of the County. Aside from having to experience
offensive odors, many of these residents also have complained of headaches, nausea,
sore throats and other physical side effects from breathing and smelling the distinctive
odor generated by industrial hemp grown to produce CBD oil.
C. The City Council finds that there is a current and immediate threat to the
public safety, health and welfare presented by the increased crime associated with
industrial hemp activities. The Ventura County Sheriff’s Department documented 10
cases of hemp theft in only 34 days in October and November 2019, and the County
has arrested 10 individuals in connection with stolen hemp. During one such event a
30
Ordinance No. ____
Page 2
firearm was reportedly brandished where the suspects were suspected of planning to
steal hemp plants. Of the 10 individuals arrested on suspicion of hemp theft, nine of
them resided outside of the County. Given that industrial hemp is now grown within the
County, the Sheriff’s Department is concerned that criminals are travelling into the
County for the purpose of stealing hemp plants and hemp paraphernalia. Theft of hemp
plants is made easier by limited security measures observed by the Sheriff’s
Department during inspections of existing hemp farms within the County. The additional
patrols and investigatory resources devoted to industrial hemp activities prevent the
Sheriff’s Department from undertaking other crime prevention activities in surrounding
areas, and it is reasonable to surmise that hemp activities within the City would detract
the Sheriff’s Department from undertaking other crime prevention activities in the City.
Based on this evidence, the City Council finds that the adoption of this Interim
Ordinance is necessary for the immediate preservation of the public safety, health and
welfare.
D. The City Council further finds that certain products containing or produced
with industrial hemp, primarily cannabidiols (CBD), have not yet received Federal Drug
Administration (FDA) approval to determine whether they are effective to treat particular
conditions or have other effects that may be claimed. In addition, such products have
not been subjected to an FDA evaluation to determine proper dosages, dangerous side
effects, or other safety conditions. As a result, persons purchasing such products may
be exposed to misleading, unproven, or false claims associated with industrial hemp
products, including CBD extracted from industrial hemp, which is a real and legitimate
public health and safety concern. Furthermore, the FDA has noted that it has seen only
limited data about CBD safety and the data points to real risks that should be
considered before CBD is ingested. Finally, according to the FDA, the quality of many
CBD products has not been fully evaluated with respect to the processing controls and
practices involved in the production of CBD that may put consumers at additional health
risks. For these reasons, the City Council desires to exercise its police power, including
the City’s land use authority, to protect the public health and safety from the risks
associated from the retail sale of industrial hemp products, including CBD, that have not
yet received approval from the FDA for consumption.
E. Allowing industrial hemp activities, without a complete and adequate state
and federal regulatory framework in place, will not adequately protect the public’s
safety, health and welfare. As such, if the City fails to enact this moratorium, industrial
hemp activities will continue to create a current and immediate threat to the public
safety, health and welfare.
E. The City Council finds that this Interim Ordinance is not subject to the
California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Sections 15061(c)(3) (the
activity will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in
the environment), 15060(c)(3) and 15378 (the activity is not a project under CEQA) of
the CEQA Guidelines, California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Chapter 3, because it
has no potential for resulting in physical change to the environment, directly or
31
Ordinance No. ____
Page 3
indirectly. This is because the moratorium adopted by this Interim Ordinance merely
prohibits uses that have significant impacts on public health, safety and welfare, and
does not permit any development that could result in a significant change to the
environment. Furthermore, the moratorium established by this Interim Ordinance is
temporary pending the study and investigation of regulatory tools to address the
impacts created by industrial hemp activities. In addition, the Interim Ordinance is
categorically exempt from CEQA pursuant to Section 15308 of the CEQA Guidelines,
because this ordinance is a regulatory action taken by the City in accordance with
California Government Code Section 65858 to assure maintenance and protection of
the environment pending further review of the potential impacts of industrial hemp uses
in the City and completion of contemplated Zoning Ordinance revisions.
SECTION 2. Definitions
A. “Cultivation” means the planting, growing, harvesting, drying, curing,
grading, or trimming of industrial hemp.
B. “Industrial hemp” means a fiber or oilseed crop, or both, that is limited to
types of the plant Cannabis sativa L. having no more than three-tenths of one percent
(0.3%) tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) contained in the dried flowering tops, whether
growing or not; the seeds of the plant; the resin extracted from any part of the plant; and
every compound, manufacture, salt, derivative, mixture, or preparation of the plant, its
seeds or resin produced therefrom.
C. “Unapproved industrial hemp products” means any item or thing
containing any amount of industrial hemp that is intended for human or animal
consumption and has not yet received approval by the United States Food and Drug
Administration.
D. “Manufacturing” means to compound, blend, extract, infuse, process, or
otherwise make or prepare an industrial hemp product.
E. “Retail sale” means any person or business selling or offering to sell, or to
otherwise convey or exchange for any form of consideration, the following: (1) industrial
hemp or products derived from any amount of industrial hemp where the sale of such
products comprises five percent or more of the business’s floor area or five percent or
more of the gross sales of such business in any one month period; or (2) unapproved
industrial hemp products in any quantity or amount.
F. “Storing” means to store unprocessed industrial hemp.
G. “Testing” means a laboratory, facility, or entity in the state that offers or
performs tests of industrial hemp and industrial hemp products.
32
Ordinance No. ____
Page 4
SECTION 3. Moratorium Established
The City of Moorpark hereby establishes a moratorium on the cultivation,
manufacturing, testing, retail sale, and storing of industrial hemp. Cultivation,
manufacturing, testing, retail sale, and storing of industrial hemp shall all constitute
prohibited uses under Title 17 of the Moorpark Municipal Code and no building permit,
business regulatory permit, zoning clearance, or other entitlement may be issued for the
purposes of authorizing such uses.
SECTION 4. Penalty
A violation of any provision of this Interim Ordinance shall constitute a violation of
the Municipal Code and is subject to all applicable penalties, fines, and remedies
described in Chapter 1.10 of the Moorpark Municipal Code. Each and every day a
violation of this Interim Ordinance exists shall constitute a separate and distinct violation
of the Municipal Code.
SECTION 5. Term of Moratorium
This Interim Ordinance shall expire, and the moratorium established hereby shall
terminate, 45 days after the date of adoption, unless extended by the City Council at a
noticed public hearing pursuant to California Government Code Section 65858.
SECTION 6. Investigation and Report During Term of Moratorium
During the term of this Interim Ordinance, the Community Development Director
is directed to study appropriate regulatory tools to mitigate the conditions outlined in
Section 1 that arise out of the cultivation, manufacturing, testing, retail sale, and storing
of industrial hemp, including but not limited to the prohibition of all such uses. The
Community Development Director is further directed to report back to the City Council
with his or her findings and a proposed ordinance to implement the recommended
course of action.
SECTION 7. Effective Date; Findings of Urgency; and Duration
A. This Interim Ordinance is adopted as an urgency ordinance pursuant to
the provisions of Government Code Sections 65858, 36934 and 36937, and shall take
effect immediately upon its adoption. Based upon the findings set forth in Section 1
above, the City Council finds and determines that the adoption of this Interim Ordinance
is an urgency ordinance authorized by Government Code Section 65858, and is
necessary for the immediate preservation of the public health, safety, and welfare.
B. Pursuant to Government Code Section 65858(a), this Interim Ordinance
shall be adopted by not less than a four-fifths vote of the City Council and shall be in
effect for 45 days from its adoption. After notice pursuant to Government Code Section
33
Ordinance No. ____
Page 5
65090 and a public hearing, the City Council may extend the Interim Ordinance for up to
an additional 10 months and 15 days and subsequently for one year, if necessary. The
Community Development Director and the City Clerk’s office shall undertake all actions
legally necessary to extend this Interim Ordinance in the event the studies and reports
desired by the City Council will not be concluded on or before the 45th day subsequent
to the adoption of this Interim Ordinance.
SECTION 8. Severability
If any provision of this Interim Ordinance, the application thereof to any person or
circumstance, or the moratorium on any of the specific uses of industrial hemp is held
invalid, such invalidity shall not affect other provisions, moratoria, or applications of this
Interim Ordinance which can be given effect without the invalid provision or application,
and to this end the provisions of this ordinance are severable. The City Council hereby
declares that it would have adopted this Interim Ordinance irrespective of the invalidity
of any particular portion thereof.
SECTION 9. Publication and Certification
The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this ordinance; shall
enter the same in the book of original ordinances of said City; shall make a minute of the
passage and adoption thereof in the records of the proceedings of the City Council at
which the same is passed and adopted; and shall publish notice of adoption in the
manner required by law.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 18th day of December, 2019.
Janice S. Parvin, Mayor
ATTEST:
Ky Spangler, City Clerk
34