The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutAGENDA REPORT 2020 0429 SPC CC ITEM 09ACITY OF MOORPARK,  CALIFORNIA City Council Meeting of April 29, 2020 ACTION Approved staff recommendation. BY B.Garza. A. Consider Use of Remaining Proceeds in the Amount of $2,023,324 from Capital Projects funded through Tax Allocation Bonds Issued in 2006 and Consider Allocating Funding to Projects that Benefit the Former Redevelopment Agency Project Area. Staff Recommendation: 1) Authorize staff to allocate remaining funds, in the amount of $2,023,324 in the FY 2020/21 to the below projects in Capital Improvement Budget in the following manner: High Street Streetscape: $1,500,000; Sidewalk Rehabilitation, $273,324; and Millard Drain, $250,000; and 2) Provide any direction on the proposed funding levels for the projects and provide direction on any recommended amendments. (ROLL CALL VOTE REQUIRED) (Staff: Troy Brown) Item: 9.A. Item: 9.A. MOORPARK CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT TO: Honorable City Council FROM: Troy Brown, City Manager DATE: 04/29/2020 Special Meeting SUBJECT: Consider Use of Remaining Proceeds in the Amount of $2,023,324 from Capital Projects funded through Tax Allocation Bonds Issued in 2006 and Consider Allocating Funding to Projects that Benefit the Former Redevelopment Agency Project Area SUMMARY The City of Moorpark has remaining funds on hand from transactions associated with the issuance of bonds that were used for a myriad of purposes in the early to mid-2000s. All intended purposes for the use of the bond proceeds have been fulfilled and the City has remaining funds on hand in the amount of approximately $2,023,324. In February 2020, staff received direction from the Council on the use of remaining funds. Staff is now seeking approval to use the remaining funds in a manner consistent with prior direction from Council to provide funding for High Street improvements, sidewalk improvements in the former redevelopment area, and allocating funding for work associated with reconstruction of the Millard Drain. DISCUSSION In 2006 bonds were issued for the City to undertake a number of Capital Improvement Projects. Bond proceeds in the amount of $8.9 million were deposited into a 2006 bonds project fund. The $8.9 million, plus interest earnings, were used on qualifying projects, including the construction of the Ruben Castro Human Services Center which consists of two buildings. One of the buildings in the Center - Building A - was later conveyed to the County of Ventura for $5.6 million. The $5.6 million was deposited in the 2006 bond project fund. Later, with the approval of the California Department of Finance (DOF), $1.9 million of that amount was transferred by the Successor Agency to the City. Therefore, the source of the $1.9 million, which with accrued interest has grown to $2,023,324, is more likely surplus funds from the Ruben Castro Project. In any event, the transfer of the 1 Honorable City Council 04/29/2020 Special Meeting Page 2 monies by the Successor Agency was determined and approved by the DOF and are available for use. On January 11, 2017, the Successor Agency to the Redevelopment Agency approved a Funding Agreement to provide for the transfer of remaining proceeds for projects. The Funding Agreement for the bonds identified broad uses for proceeds and provides the following Description of Projects which are eligible uses per the bond covenants and Official Statement: 1. High Street Streetscape Project 2. Los Angeles Widening Project 3. Princeton Avenue Widening Project 4. Any other programs, projects and activities of benefit to the Project Area, so long as the program or project is determined by the City to be consistent with the bond covenants under the indenture. The City Council has previously discussed the use of remaining funds for a variety of projects. On February 5, 2020, staff presented a list of potential projects to the City Council for funding consideration. The staff report from the February 5, 2020, City Council meeting is included as Attachment 1 and provides context and background for the basis of this report. At that meeting, the City Council provided direction to staff on the specific projects that were proposed and eligible for funding. All of the proposed projects benefit the former Redevelopment Area of the City. A recap of the direction provided on the projects presented at the February 5, 2020, meeting is below. 1. High Street Streetscape Project - $1,000,000 Previously Proposed Amount In 2009, the City completed a plan to improve High Street by installing a number of features that enhance pedestrian mobility and vehicular traffic and create a sense of place by integrating functional and artistic features on the street. Some of the improvements contemplated are: improved trash receptacles, bus stop cut outs, stamped concrete pedestrian crosswalks, tree grates, kiosks, benches and additional sidewalk improvements. Historical budget documents, preliminary design work, and contemplated costs in the amount of $3.5 million to complete all projects were identified in the High Street Streetscape Plan. Adjusting that figure for inflation using a historic actual inflation factor of 1.7% over 10 years, the estimated costs to construct the improvements today would be approximately $4.2 million. Staff noted that additional improvements could include: sidewalk improvements, stamped concrete crosswalks, benches, improved signage and way finding for parking and improved trash receptacles on High Street. 2 Honorable City Council 04/29/2020 Special Meeting Page 3 Previous direction from City Council: The City Council noted that implementation of the High Street Streetscape Plan serves as a vital tool in Economic Development to incentivize additional investment from the private sector, in addition to making significant progress on Downtown Specific Plan. The City Council directed staff to include this project as part of the overall expenditure plan and indicated that allocation of additional funds beyond the $1 million staff proposed is warranted. 2. Millard Drain - $188,000 Previously Proposed Amount This project is identified in the Capital Improvement Program and has an approximate cost of $510,000. The project consists of construction of a storm drain to serve the residential area north of the intersection of Los Angeles Avenue and Shasta Avenue, as identified in the City Master Plan of Drainage. No funding source has been identified for this project. Previous direction from City Council: There was consensus to provide some funding for the Millard Drain; however the Council directed staff to add additional funds to sidewalk improvements and the High Street Streetscape projects which have a greater quality of life and economic impacts to the City. At the February 5, 2020, City Council meeting staff recommended $188,000 in remaining funds be allocated to this project to be used for design of the drainage and assist with funding construction. The Council concurred that funding should be allocated to the Millard Drain project. 3. Modify and Upgrade Wall Treatment (LA Ave) $200,000 Previously Proposed Amount This project is identified in the City Council Strategies, Goals and Objectives as referenced in Strategy V – Enhance Quality of Life for Moorpark Residents, Goal 5 – Enhance Municipal Service Delivery through Property Maintenance and Improvement of City Facilities and Programs. The project entails modifications and upgrading of wall treatment and enhancing landscaping on the north side of Los Angeles Avenue (SR 118) between Millard Avenue and Spring Road. This project is not contemplated in the current two-year planning cycle and funding for the project has not been identified. Previous direction from City Council: The City Council provided direction to not allocate any funds for modifications and wall treatment enhancements on Los Angeles Avenue. 4. ADA Improvements - $100,000 Previously Proposed Amount At the February 2020 City Council meeting, staff proposed allocating some of the funds toward implementation of the City’s Americans with Disability Act (ADA) Transition Plan. The ADA Tranisition Plan reviews access to City programs, services, website, activities, events, facilities, parks, trails, and public rights-of-way by persons with disabilities in order to determine if any discriminatory or potentially discriminatory practices, policies or procedures exist in accordance with the ADA. Findings and barriers are identified and recommended corrections, with cost estimates, are also included in the Plan. 3 Honorable City Council 04/29/2020 Special Meeting Page 4 The Plan contemplates a total cost of $23.7 million to complete all projects citywide. To address projects in the transition plan, the City allocates $25,000 per year toward improvements already identified in the Transition Plan. Corrections are also made while projects are completed. For example, if playground equipment exists that has accessiblity barriers and the playground equipment is replaced because it is due for replacement, the barriers are automatically corrected with the new playground equipment installation project. As a further example, whenever Public Works has a street slurry project, ADA requirements are incorporated into the design, thereby eliminating barriers that were identified prior to the street project completion. Funds allocated toward ADA improvements in the former Redevelopment Area would facilitate curb cuts, concrete gutters, and more. Previous direction from City Council: The City Council provided direction to not allocate any funds for toward implementation of the City’s ADA plan. Many of these improvements will occur during construction or reconstruction of projects. 5. Spring Road/Charles Street Bus Turnout - $150,000 Previously Proposed Amount This project consists of construction of a bus turn out on Charles Street at Spring Road and is identified in the Capital Improvement Program at an approximate cost of $150,000. Funding of the project is anticipated to occur in FY 2021/22 and use Traffic Systems Management (TSM) funds. Staff recommends this project to be forward-funded using remaining bond proceeds allowing TSM funds to be allocated to other future projects. Previous direction from City Council: The City Council directed staff to seek funding for this project from monies designated for Transportation and not allocate any remaining bond funds for this project. Additional Follow Up from February 5, 2020 City Council Discussion As a follow up, staff referenced conversations with the City Council from 2015 during prior discussions regarding the use of remaining funds. In 2015, staff had contemplated making repairs to sidewalks to improve mobility in a number of places in the former RDA. At that time, it was contemplated that there may be an estimated $2 million for the Redevelopment Project Area Zones and $1million for High Street improvements. .Based on these estimates, staff developed a list of proposed sidewalk improvements to be funded using remaining RDA funds, assuming an estimated $2.7million would be available for use in various RDA zones in the City. The list of improvement included ramps, cross gutters and some sidewalk repairs. Following the discussions and staff assessment, no funding was ever allocated to any of the projects outlined in 2015. For reference, the list of anticipated sidewalk improvements is included as Attachment 2 to this staff report. Further references from prior discussions identifed a memorandum to the City Council dated June 30, 2018, titled: Potential Use of Remaining Bond Proceeds from Former Redevelopment Agency Issued Bonds which provided a variety of potential projects the 4 Honorable City Council 04/29/2020 Special Meeting Page 5 Council could allocated funds towards. For reference, this memorandum is included as Attachment 3 to this staff report. Recommended Use of Remaining Proceeds 1. High Street Streetscape Project - $1,500,000 The City and Redevelopment Agency have collectively spent several millions of dollars on infrastructure, programmatic improvement, parks and public works improvements in the High Street area. Some of these improvements include: relocating the Fire Station to High Street, acquiring the High Street Arts Center, creating public parking lots, land acquisitions, upgrading street lighting on High Street to vintage style light poles and more. A complete list of capital project investments made by the City is attached as Attachment 4 to this staff report which summarizes many of the significant efforts the City has previously initiated. Implementation of the High Street Streetscape project has long been a priority of the Council dating back to at least 2007. In December 2007, the City Council released a Request for Proposal (RFP) for design services to present viable streetscape alternatives to enhance the look and feel of High Street. The process was facilitated by Larry Moss and Associates and involved extensive community input and was followed by adoption of the High Street Streetscape Plan in June 2009. The June 3, 2009, staff report is included as Attachment 5. Although a formal implementation plan was never formulated for improvements, the City continued to make significant investment on High Street over a number of years. While no specific project is contemplated as part of this staff report, funding could be allocated toward any number of the remaining improvements included in the Plan. Some of the remaining improvements to be completed include: • Wayfinding Signage; • Sidewalk or frontage Improvements; • Street Furniture; • Crosswalk and Pedestrian Improvements; • Other projects as defined by the City Council. (this list is not intended to be exhaustive) Recommendation: Consistent with City Council direction, staff recommends allocating an additional $500,000 to bring the total allocation for the High Street Streetscape project to $1.5 million. Prior to any funds being expended, staff would seek the input of the City Council to determine the use of funds for any particular project. 5 Honorable City Council 04/29/2020 Special Meeting Page 6 2. Sidewalk Rehabilitation $273,324 Appropriate maintenance of the public right-of-way is always a challenge. Sidewalks within the right-of-way are well traversed and often get damaged as they are subjected to heat, rain and other elements, suffer damage from root intrusion, vehicles, excavations by utility companies, movement/settlement of soil, and other factors. Sidewalks, like many public improvements, have a useful life and natural wear and tear necessitates the need for sidewalk rehabilitation. The City has undertaken a number of efforts over the years maintain sidewalks and where necessary identified sidewalks that are in need of repair and/or replacement. Sidewalks within the boundaries of the former Redevelopment Area are generally older and in need of more repair than sidewalks in more recently developed areas of the City (those that have been constructed since incorporation). In 2015 as the City contemplated use of remaining Redevelopment Funds, staff identified sidewalk and street work that could be funded by the leftover redevelopment funds. At that time, it was envisioned that approximately $2.7 million would be available in remaining RDA funds which would allow for certain ramp and sidewalk repairs. Staff developed an internal list of identified improvements that could be funded using the remaining RDA funds. As previously mentioned, a copy of the list of Proposed Sidewalk Improvements from discussions in 2015 is attached as Attachment 2. Following the staff effort in 2015, in 2017 the City contracted with Disability Advisory Consultants to prepare an ADA Transition Plan. The purpose of the Transition Plan is to identify barriers to those with accessibility needs and categorize them into certain groups such as: public facilities, right-of-way, transportation improvements, etc. The City’s ADA Transition Plan also identified numerous sidewalks in need of repair, and are also included for reference as part of Attachment 2. To address the need for sidewalk repairs, the City makes repairs on an as-needed basis. As a general rule, once the City has acknowledgment of an existing deficiency, an assessment is made to determine the cause of the damage. Upon having knowledge of damages, the City assesses whether the work can be performed by in-house staff to conduct fill, grinding or other intermediary steps. If the work requires full or partial replacement, improvements for ADA access or major renovations, this work is scheduled in large batches and contracted out to a firm specializing in the work. This batching approach allows the City to save funding by achieving economies of scale, minimizing mobilization costs and providing efficiencies in achieving repair. This is a commonly used approach for public agencies that manage many miles of sidewalk; however it generally results in a backlog due to available resources (funding) to keep pace with the needs. Certain improvements, such as curb cuts, transitions and reconstruction are also planned to be completed in conjunction with the annual slurry seal project. Each year, the City uses gas taxes to perform regular slurry seal on road surfaces. This prolongs the life of the base 6 Honorable City Council 04/29/2020 Special Meeting Page 7 of the roadway and reduces overall maintenance costs. During this process, if there are minor sidewalk repairs that can be completed by the awarding contractor, certain repairs will be completed at that time. These costs are allowable for the use of funds allocated to the slurry seal project; however this reduces the amount of funds and amount of slurry that is applied to the roadway. Due to funding levels in normal circumstances, there is insufficient funding to complete all repairs to sidewalks in any given fiscal year. Recommendation: Consistent with City Council direction, staff is recommending the allocation of $273,324 for sidewalk rehabilitation which will be directed toward sidewalks within the former RDA boundaries. The improvements will include curb cuts, street transitions, lifted, cracked or otherwise damaged segments and rehabilitation if necessary. The specific locations will be determined at a future date and City Council approval will be obtained prior to any work commencing. 3. Millard Drain - $250,000 The Council provided direction to include funding for the Millard Drain as an expense for remaining funds. As previously mentioned, this project is identified in the Capital Improvement Program and has an approximate cost of $510,000. The project consists of construction of a storm drain to serve the residential area north of the intersection of Los Angeles Avenue and Shasta Avenue, as identified in the City Master Plan of Drainage. No funding source has been identified for this project. Recommendation: Staff recommends $250,000 in remaining funds be allocated to this project to be used for design of the drainage and assist with funding construction. Overall project costs will be funded in future fiscal years dependent on final costs obtained through design and available funds for construction. FISCAL IMPACT If approved by the City Council, staff will incorporate the use of $2,023,324 in remaining funds in the FY 2020/21 budget and appropriate the funding to the projects approved by City Council. The funds will be expended in accordance with the terms set forth in various contracts which will entail City Council approval upon execution of each contract. COUNCIL GOAL COMPLIANCE This action is consistent with City Council Strategy 3, Goal 2, Objective 1 (3.2.1): Develop spending plan for use of former Moorpark Redevelopement Agency 2006 Tax Allocation Bonds for presentation to City Council by December 31, 2019. 7 Honorable City Council 04/29/2020 Special Meeting Page 8 STAFF RECOMMENDATION (ROLL CALL VOTE REQUIRED) 1. Authorize staff to allocate remaining funds, in the amount of $2,023,324 in the FY 2020/21 to the below projects in Capital Improvement Budget in the following manner: Project Amount High St. Streetscape $1,500,000 Sidewalk Rehabilitation $273,324 Millard Drain $250,000 2. Provide any direction on the proposed funding levels for the projects and provide direction on any recommended amendments. Attachment 1: Staff Report, February 5, 2020 Attachment 2: List of Anticipated Sidewalk Improvements Attachment 3: Memo, Potential Use of Remaining Bond Proceeds from Former Redevelopment Agency Issued Bonds, June 30, 2018 Attachment 4: Capital Project Investments, High Street and Vicinity Attachment 5: Staff Report, June 3, 2009 8 Item: 9.A. MOORPARK CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT TO: Honorable City Council FROM: Troy Brown, City Manager DATE: 02/05/2020 Regular Meeting SUBJECT: Consider Use of Remaining Proceeds in the Amount of $2,023,324 from Tax Allocation Bonds Issued in 2006 and Authorize Staff to Allocate Funding to Projects that Benefit the Former Redevelopment Agency Project Area BACKGROUND On March 28, 2017, the Successor Agency to the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Moorpark (the “Successor Agency”) entered into a Bond Proceeds Funding Agreement with the City of Moorpark (“City”) for the purpose of transferring and using the remaining proceeds of 2006 Tax Allocation Bond (“Bond”), as was sold, on the projects of benefit to the Project Area that are consistent with the bond covenants. Subject to the provisions and execution of this Agreement and through the filing of fiscal year (FY) 2017/18 Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule (“ROPS”), the Successor Agency requested $4,500,000 of the proceeds be transmitted to the City, and although this petition along with ROPS was ratified at the Oversight Board, Department of Finance (“DOF”), however, partially approved $1,938,073 as the available unencumbered balance for the transfer. Since then, this amount has been accruing interest and the available balance now is $2,023,324. The City intends to use these remaining proceeds in a manner consistent with the covenants in the Indenture, and allocate it in the Project Area as previously identified in the said Agreement. DISCUSSION Pursuant to Section 34191.4 of the Health and Safety Code, after the former Successor Agency’s receipt of a Finding of Completion issued by DOF, any unspent proceeds of the 1 ATTACHMENT 1 9 Honorable City Council 2/5/2020 Regular Meeting Page 2 Bond shall be used for the purposes for which the Bond was sold, in a manner consistent with the bond covenants. The 2006 bond issuance provided flexibility in the use of bond proceeds but required that the funds be expended in the former project area. The Official Statement outlines allowable uses of bond proceeds and states: “While the Agency does have flexibility related to the expenditure of its bond proceeds, it is expected that the 2006 Bond proceeds will be expended on public improvements in the Project Area. The Agency currently anticipates using proceeds of the 2006 Bonds primarily for the construction of a planned Human Services Center on land owned by the City in the Project Area, which upon completion is expected to be leased to public entities and/or to charitable organizations qualified as exempt from income tax under Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code (the "Code").” The Official Statement goes further to state: “Notwithstanding the anticipated Section 501(c)(3) related uses of proceeds of the 2006 Bonds, the Agency may elect to use proceeds of the 2006 Bonds for other projects unrelated to such charitable organization uses, including, but not limited to: parks, streets, alleys, landscaping, street lights, drainage, undergrounding of utility lines, public parking lots, a library facility, land acquisition, relocation assistance, or clean up of sites adversely impacted by hazardous materials.” (emphasis added). Proceeds of the 2006 bond were primarily used to construct the Ruben Castro Services Center. The project was completed in 2013 at a total cost of $12.6 million. Additionally, in 2015, $729,129 of the proceeds was also used to partially fund the installation of a neighborhood park, known as Walnut Acres Park, at 161 Second Street. Upon completion and approval of FY 2017/18 ROPS, $1.9 million of the remaining proceeds was transferred from Successor Agency to the City. This amount is now available for use in the former agency’s project area. On January 18, 2017, the Successor Agency to the Redevelopment Agency approved a Funding Agreement to provide for the transfer of remaining bond proceeds for projects. The Funding Agreement for the bonds identified broad uses for proceeds and provides the following Description of Projects which are eligible uses per the bond covenants and Official Statement: 1. High Street Streetscape Project 2. Los Angeles Widening Project 3. Princeton Avenue Widening Project 4. Any other programs, projects and activities of benefit to the Project Area, so long as the program or project is determined by the City to be consistent with the bond covenants under the indenture. See the attached January 18, 2017, staff report identifying these uses. 210 Honorable City Council 2/5/2020 Regular Meeting Page 3 The remaining bond proceeds were neither allocated nor designated for the above uses as other funding sources became available, or delays resulted in programs and projects not moving forward. Therefore, bond proceeds remain available to fund projects that benefit the former RDA project area. Below is a funding summary of the previously identified Description of Projects listed as items 1 – 3: 1. High Street Streetscape Project In 2009 the City completed a plan to improve High Street by installing a number of features that enhance pedestrian mobility and vehicular traffic, and create a sense of place by integrating functional and artistic features on the street. Some of the improvements contemplated are: improved trash receptacles, bus stop cut outs, stamped concrete pedestrian crosswalks, tree grates, kiosks, benches and additional sidewalk improvements. Historical budget documents and preliminary design work surveyed the costs in the amount of $3.5 million to complete all projects identified in the High Street Streetscape Plan. Adjusting that figure for inflation by a factor of 1.6% over 10 years estimates the costs of construction and improvements to be approximately $4.2 million. 2. Los Angeles Avenue Widening Widening of Los Angeles Avenue (State Route 118) from Spring Road to Moorpark Avenue includes street widening and addition of travel lanes, an emergency lane, and curb/gutter and sidewalk along the south side of Los Angeles Avenue from a point east of Spring Road west to Moorpark Avenue. The project will also include construction of a storm drain along the south side of Los Angeles Avenue and installation of a traffic signal at Millard Street. It should be noted that the project is not anticipated to begin construction until all right-of-way has been obtained. Currently, the City does not possess all required right-of-way to construct the project. The total cost to construct the project is estimated at $4.3 million and the project is currently underfunded. The below table shows the funding sources available to construct this project. Los Angeles Avenue Widening – Spring Road to Moorpark Avenue – Project C0021 Funding Sources: Los Angeles Area of Contribution $1,019,688.00 TEA 21 Federal Grants $796,770.00 Total Appropriated – FY 2019/20 $1,816,458.00 The City previously spent $2,472,776 on land purchase and $842,073 on professional service designs related to the right-of-way acquired. Until the project is completely designed and full right-of-way is obtained, the actual costs for the improvements are only an estimate. Bond proceeds are not recommended to be allocated to this project at this time due to the additional right-of-way needing to be purchased. The project is not shovel- ready. 311 Honorable City Council 2/5/2020 Regular Meeting Page 4 3. Princeton Avenue Widening Project The Princeton Avenue Widening project is fully funded using the following sources: Princeton Avenue Widening – Project C0020 Funding Sources: Los Angeles Area of Contribution $5,699,191.00 Federal & State Grants $1,287,244.00 Total Appropriated – FY 2019/20 $6,986,435.00 However, construction costs have likely risen since the original project engineer’s estimate, and the project has not been formally bid. Staff recommends allocating $520,000 of bond proceeds to the Princeton Avenue Widening Project to account for increases in construction costs. This amount represents 7% of the total project estimate. Allocation of Remaining Proceeds The funding agreement gives broad discretion to the City in the use of remaining bond proceeds. The funds must be used on projects that benefit the former redevelopment area, and consistent with uses identified in the Funding Agreement between the City and the Successor Agency, which allow allocations toward “any other programs, projects and activities of benefit to the Project Area, so long as the program or project is determined by the City to be consistent with the bond covenants under the indenture.” To identify programs and projects where funding could be allocated staff analyzed first, programs and projects within the boundaries of the former redevelopment area, second, previously identified priority projects per the City Councils’ Strategies, Goals and Objectives and third, projects listed in the City’s Capital Improvement Program. A number of projects have already been identified as the City typically identifies more projects than funding is available for. The following projects are suitable for forward-funding and are eligible uses for the remaining bond proceeds: High Street Streetscape Project – $1,000,000 Funding has not been identified for any High Street improvements. Staff recommends allocating $1 million in bond proceeds to implement a number of improvements on High Street. The improvements could include: additional sidewalk improvements, stamped concrete crosswalks, benches, improved signage and wayfinding for parking and improved trash receptacles on High Street. The implementation of the High Street Streetscape Plan serves as a vital tool in economic development to incentivize additional investment from the private sector, in addition to making significant progress on Downtown Specific Plan. 412 Honorable City Council 2/5/2020 Regular Meeting Page 5 Millard Drain – $573,000 This project is identified in the Capital Improvement Program and has an approximate cost of $510,000. The project consists of construction of a storm drain to serve the residential area north of the intersection of Los Angeles Avenue and Shasta Avenue, as identified in the City’s Master Plan of Drainage. No funding source has been identified for this project. The 1995 cost estimate for this project was $188,000. However the full scope and cost of this has never been determined. This funding would be used for design of the drainage, and assist with funding construction. Overall project costs will be funded in future fiscal years dependent on final costs obtained through design and available funds for construction. Modify and Upgrade Wall Treatment (Los Angeles Avenue) – $200,000 This project is identified in the City Council Strategies, Goals and Objectives as part of Strategy V – Enhance Quality of Life for Moorpark Residents, Goal 5 – Enhance municipal service delivery through property maintenance and improvement of City facilities and programs. The project entails modifications and upgrading of wall treatment and enhancing landscaping on the north side of Los Angeles Avenue (SR 118) between Millard Avenue and Spring Road. This project is not contemplated in the current two-year planning cycle and funding for the project has not been identified. ADA Improvements – $100,000 The City recently completed an ADA Transition Plan that identifies a number of accessibility projects that need to be completed. The plan estimates a total cost of $23,711,114 to complete all projects citywide. To address projects in the Transition Plan, the City budgets $25,000 per year toward improvements already identified in the Plan. Funds allocated toward ADA improvements in the former redevelopment area would facilitate capital improvements to: bus stops, facilities and parks, streets and curbs, and signalized intersections. The City’s ADA Transition Plan contains a number of projects in each of the aforementioned categories and the use of funds will be allocated to specific projects during the fiscal year 2020/21 budget process. Spring Road/Charles Street Bus Turnout – $150,000 This project is identified in the Capital Improvement Program and has an approximate cost of $150,000. The project consists of construction of a bus turn out on Charles Street at Spring Road. Funding in the project is anticipated to occur in FY 2021/22 and use Traffic Systems Management (TSM) fund. Staff recommends this project to be forward funded using bond proceeds allowing TSM funds to be allocated to other future projects. FISCAL IMPACT There is no fiscal impact in FY 2019/20 budget. Appropriations to the proposed project will be included in the FY 2020/21 budget development. 513 Honorable City Council 2/5/2020 Regular Meeting Page 6 COUNCIL GOAL COMPLIANCE This action is consistent with City Council Strategy 3, Goal 2, Objective 3 (3.2.1): “Develop Spending Plan for use of former Moorpark Redevelopment Agency 2006 Tax Allocation Bonds for Presentation to City Council by December 31, 2019.” STAFF RECOMMENDATION Approve recommended uses of remaining proceeds from 2006 Tax Allocation bonds or discuss and provide direction to staff on the use of remaining tax allocation bond funds. Attachment: January 18, 2017, Staff Report considering Resolution Approving the City's Execution and Delivery of a Bond Proceeds Funding Agreement to Provide for the Transfer of Remaining Bond Proceeds for Projects 614 ATTACHMENT TO: From: Date: Subject: MOORPARK CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT Honorable City Council Ron Ahlers, Finance Director~ ITEM 10.K. January 11, 2017 (City Council Meeting of January 18, 2017) Consider Resolution Approving the City's Execution and Delivery of a Bond Proceeds Funding Agreement to Provide for the Transfer of Remaining Bond Proceeds for Projects BACKGROUND Before dissolution, the former Redevelopment Agency of the City of Moorpark (the "Former Agency") issued the following (collectively, the "Bonds"): (i) its Moorpark Redevelopment Project, 1999 Tax Allocation Refunding Bonds, in the principal amount of $9,860,000, (ii) its Moorpark Redevelopment Project, 2001 Tax Allocation Bonds, in the principal amount of $11,625,000, and (iii) its Moorpark Redevelopment Project, 2006 Tax Allocation Bonds, in the principal amount of $11,695,000. The Bonds were issued and sold to finance and refinance projects of benefit to the Former Agency's Moorpark Redevelopment Project. There remain in the Successor Agency's accounts unspent proceeds of the Bonds. DISCUSSION Pursuant to Section 34191.4 of the Health and Safety Code, after the Successor Agency's receipt of a finding of completion (the "Finding of Completion") issued by the California State Department of Finance (the "DOF"), the unspent proceeds of the Bonds shall be used for the purposes for which the Bonds were sold, in a manner consistent with the bond covenants. The Successor Agency desires to use the remaining proceeds of the Bonds for the purpose of which the Bonds were sold, namely projects of benefit to the Project Area that are consistent with the bond covenants. Because of the limited staffing of the Successor Agency and the City's traditional role and established procedures for the awarding of public works contracts, it is desirable for the Successor Agency to transfer the remaining unspent bond proceeds to the City, for the City to implement and perform the work required for the projects. Each transfer of bond proceeds to the City must be listed on a Recognized Obligation Payment ("ROPS"). Under current law, the 144 715 Honorable City Council January 18, 2017 Page 2 Successor Agency prepares a ROPS once a year. Each ROPS must be submitted to the Oversight Board and the DOF for approval. While the Successor Agency may choose to transfer the bond proceeds over time based on actual contract needs for each ROPS period, it is preferable for all of the remaining unspent bond proceeds to be transferred to the City at once, to facilitate the effective and efficient implementation of the projects. Pursuant to the Bond Proceeds Funding Agreement, the Successor Agency will list the transfer of all of the remaining bond proceeds on the next available ROPS (which covers the 2017-18 fiscal year), and will transfer the bond proceeds to the City per the DOF-approved ROPS. Exhibit A of the Bond Proceeds Funding Agreement contains a list of the anticipated projects, but also specifies that the actual projects to be funded may be different from those currently listed, as determined by the City. FISCAL IMPACT Assuming the Oversight Board's and the DOF's approval of the Bond Proceeds Funding Agreement and the relevant line item on the next ROPS, the Successor Agency will transfer all of the remaining unspent bond proceeds to the City at the commencement of fiscal year 2017-18. Thereafter, the City will use the bond proceeds for projects in a manner consistent with the bond covenants and the Bond Proceeds Funding Agreement, without additional review by the Oversight Board and the DOF. STAFF RECOMMENDATION (Roll call vote) Adopt Resolution No. 2017-approving the City's execution and delivery of the Bond Proceeds Funding Agreement and taking related actions. Attachment: Resolution No. 2017---- Attachment A -Bond Proceeds Funding Agreement (substantial final form) 145 816 RESOLUTION NO. -- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK APPROVING THE EXECUTION AND DELIVERY OF A BOND PROCEEDS FUNDING AGREEMENT AND TAKING RELATED ACTIONS WHEREAS, before dissolution, the former Redevelopment Agency of the City of Moorpark (the "Former Agency") issued the following bonds (collectively, the "Bonds"): (i) its Moorpark Redevelopment Project, 1999 Tax Allocation Refunding Bonds, in the principal amount of $9,860,000, (ii) its Moorpark Redevelopment Project, 2001 Tax Allocation Bonds, in the principal amount of $11,625,000, and (iii) its Moorpark Redevelopment Project, 2006 Tax Allocation Bonds, in the principal amount of $11,695,000; and , WHEREAS, the Bonds were issued pursuant to and are governed by an Indenture of Trust, dated as of May 1, 1999 (the "Master Indenture"), as supplemented anq amended by a First Supplemental Indenture of Trust, dated as of December 1, 2001 (the "First Supplemental Indenture"), and a Second Supplemental Indenture of Trust, dated as of December 1, 2006 (the "Second Supplemental Indenture"), by and between the Former Agency and The Bank of New York Trust Company, N.A., as trustee (the "Trustee"); and WHEREAS, the Bonds were issued and sold to finance and refinance projects of benefit to a project area known as the Moorpark Redevelopment Project (the "Project Area"); and WHEREAS, pursuant to AB X1 26 (enacted in June 2011), as modified by the California Supreme, Court's decision in California Redevelopment Association, et al. v. Ana Matosantos, et al., 53 Cal. 4th 231 (2011), the Former Agency was dissolved as of February 1, 2012, the Successor Agency was constituted as the successor entity to the Former Agency, and an oversight board of the Successor Agency (the "Oversight Board") was established; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 34175(b) of the California Health and Safety Code ("HSC"), all assets, properties, contracts, books and records of the Former Agency, including the unspent proceeds of the Bonds, transferred to the control of the Successor Agency by operation of law; and WHEREAS, pursuant to HSC Section 34191.4, after the receipt by the Successor Agency of a finding of completion (the "Finding of Completion") issued by the California· State Department of Finance (the "DOF") under HSC Section 34179.7, the unspent proceeds of the Bonds shall be used for the purposes for which the Bonds were sold, in a manner consistent with the bond covenants; and 146 917 Resolution No. --- Page2 WHEREAS, by DOF's letter, dated May 25, 2013, the DOF informed the Successor Agency that the DOF has issued a Finding of Completion to the Successor Agency; and WHEREAS, the Successor Agency has determined use the remaining unspent proceeds of the Bonds (the "Remaining Bond Proceeds") for the purpose of which the Bonds were sold, namely projects of benefit to the Project Area that are consistent with the bond covenants (the "Projects"); and WHEREAS, because of the limited staffing of the Successor Agency and the City's traditional role and established procedures with respect to the awarding of public works contracts, the Successor Agency and the City desire to enter into a Bond Proceeds Funding Agreement, substantially in the form attached as Attachment A (the "Funding Agreement"); and WHEREAS, the Funding Agreement will provide for the transfer of the Remaining Proceeds to the City for the City to perform or cause to be performed the work required for the Projects; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The above recitals are true and correct and are a substantive part of this Resolution. Section 2. The Funding Agreement, in the form attached hereto as Attachment A, is hereby approved. The Mayor (or in the Mayor's absence, the Mayor Pro Tern), is hereby authorized to execute and deliver, for and in the name of the City, the Funding Agreement in substantially such form, with changes therein as the Mayor (or the Mayor Pro Tern) may approve (with such approval to be conclusively evidenced by the execution and delivery thereof). Section 3. The officers and staff of the City are hereby authorized and directed, jointly and severally, to execute such documents and do any and all things which they may deem necessary or advisable to effectuate this Resolution and the Funding Agreement and any such actions previously taken by such officers and staff are hereby ratified and confirmed. 147 1018 Resolution No. --- Page3 PASSED AND ADOPTED this 18th day of January, 2017. Janice Parvin, Mayor ATTEST: Maureen Benson, City Clerk 148 1119 ATTACHMENT A BOND PROCEEDS FUNDING AGREEMENT (in substantial final form) 149 1220 BOND PROCEEDS FUNDING AGREEMENT This BOND PROCEEDS FUNDING AGREEMENT (this "Agreement"), dated as of _____ , 2017, is entered into by and between the Successor Agency to the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Moorpark (the "Successor Agency") and the City of Moorpark (the "City," and together with the City, the "Parties"). RECITALS: A. Before dissolution, the former Redevelopment Agency of the City of Moorpark (the "Former Agency") issued the following bonds (collectively, the "Bonds"): (i) its Moorpark Redevelopment Project, 1999 Tax Allocation Refunding Bonds, in the principal amount of $9,860,000, (ii) its Moorpark Redevelopment Project, 2001 Tax Allocation Bonds, in the principal amount of $11,625,000, and (iii) its Moorpark Redevelopment Project, 2006 Tax Allocation Bonds, in the principal amount of $11,695,000. B. The Bonds were issued pursuant to and are governed by an Indenture of Trust, dated as of May 1, 1999 (the "Master Indenture"), as supplemented and amended by a First Supplemental Indenture of Trust, dated as of December 1, 2001 (the "First Supplemental Indenture"), and a Second Supplemental Indenture of Trust, dated as of December 1, 2006 (the "Second Supplemental Indenture"), by and between the Former Agency and The Bank of New York Trust Company, N.A., as trustee (the "Trustee"). C. The Bonds were issued and sold to finance and refinance projects of benefit to a project area known as the Moorpark Redevelopment Project (the "Project Area"). D. Pursuant to AB XI 26 (enacted in June 2011), as modified by the California Supreme Court's decision in California Redevelopment Association, et al. v. Ana Matosantos, et al., 53 Cal. 4th 231 (2011), the Former Agency was dissolved as of February 1, 2012, the Successor Agency was constituted as the successor entity to the Former Agency, and an oversight board of the Successor Agency (the "Oversight Board") was established. E. Pursuant to Section 34175(b) of the California Health and Safety Code ("HSC"), all assets, properties, contracts, books and records of the Former Agency, including the unspent proceeds of the Bonds, transferred to the control of the Successor Agency by operation oflaw. F. Pursuant to HSC Section 34191.4, after the receipt by the Successor Agency of a finding of completion (the "Finding of Completion") issued by the California State Department of Finance (the "DOF") under HSC Section 34179.7, the unspent proceeds of the Bonds shall be used for the purposes for which the Bonds were sold, in a manner consistent with the bond covenants. G. By DOF's letter, dated May 25, 2013, the DOF informed the Successor Agency that the DOF has issued a Finding of Completion to the Successor Agency. H. The Successor Agency desires to use the remaining unspent proceeds of the Bonds (the "Remaining Bond Proceeds") for the purpose of which the Bonds were sold, namely -1-150 1321 projects of benefit to the Project Area that are consistent with the bond covenants, including those listed in Exhibit A (collectively, the "Projects"). I. Because of the limited staffing of the Successor Agency and the City's traditional role and established procedures with respect to the awarding of public works contracts, the Successor Agency and the City desire to enter into this Agreement, for the City to perform or cause to be performed the work required for the Projects, with payment therefor to be made from the Remaining Bond Proceeds. J. This Agreement provides for the transfer of Remaining Bond Proceeds to the City for the City to perform or cause to be performed the work required for the Projects. K. Pursuant .to HSC Section 34177(0), the Successor Agency must prepare a Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule ("ROPS") each year, listing its expected expenditure and disbursement of moneys during each six month period covered by such ROPS. Each ROPS must be submitted to the Oversight Board of the Successor Agency and the DOF for approval. L. Pursuant to HSC Section 34191.4(c)(2), the expenditure of the Remaining Bond Proceeds for an obligation must be listed on a ROPS. M. This Agreement is in furtherance of the winding down of the Former Agency's affairs, with respect to the expenditure of unspent bond proceeds as permitted under HSC Section 34191.4. N. Resolution No. adopted by the Oversight Board on , 2017 approving the Successor Agency's execution and delivery of this Agreement was approved [deemed approved] by the DOF pursuant to HSC Section 34179(h) on 2017. 0. In 2014 and 2016, the Successor Agency issued bonds (the "Successor Agency Bonds") pursuant to HSC Section 34177.5 to refund a portion of the Bonds. P. The Successor Agency Bonds were issued pursuant to, and are governed by, the Master Indenture, as previously supplemented and amended, and as further supplemented and amended by a Third Supplemental Indenture, dated as of November 1, 2014, and a Fourth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of July 1, 2016, each by and between the Successor Agency and the Trustee. The Master Indenture, supplemented and amended by its four supplements, is referred to herein as the Indenture. Q. Because the proceeds of the Successor Agency Bonds were used to refund the Bonds, covenants set forth in the Indenture (particularly pertaining to the requirements under the Code (as defined in the Indenture) relating to the tax-exempt status of the Successor Agency Bonds and the remaining outstanding Bonds) continue to apply to the Remaining Bond Proceeds. NOW, THEREFORE, THE PARTIES DO HEREBY AGREE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Subject to the provisions of this Agreement and with the funding provided pursuant to this Agreement, the City agrees to perform or cause to be performed the work required for the Projects, including but not limited to the preparation of designs, plans -and -2-151 1422 specifications and all demolitions, construction and installations. The City shall perform such work in accordance with all applicable federal, state and local laws, rules and regulations. Subject to the covenants set forth herein, the City shall have the sole discretion with respect to the design, planning, specification and the timing with respect to all components of the Projects. Section 2. (a) When preparing the next ROPS after the execution and delivery of this Agreement (being "ROPS 17-18" for the period from July 1, 2017 through June 30, 2018 (the "ROPS 17-18 Period")), the Successor Agency shall list the transfer of the Remaining Bond Proceeds to the City. (b) As soon as practicable after the commencement of the ROPS 16-17 Period, the Successor Agency shall transfer the Remaining Bond Proceeds, as approved on ROPS 17-18, to the City. Section 3. The City shall use the Remaining Bond Proceeds transferred to it pursuant to this Agreement for costs of the Projects (or reimbursement to the City for any funds advanced for costs of the Projects) in a manner consistent with the covenants in the Indenture. Section 4. To the extent the City still holds unspent Remaining Bond Proceeds transferred pursuant to this Agreement after the completion of the Projects (as determined by the legislative body of the City), the City shall return such unspent Remaining Bond Proceeds to the Successor Agency within a reasonable time after such determination. Section 5. The City covenants that it shall use the Remaining Bond Proceeds in a maJll1:er consistent with the covenants in the Indenture, including, but not limited to, any covenants regarding the tax-exempt status of interest on the Bonds and the Successor Agency Bonds under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, and any regulations promulgated thereunder. Section 6. Each Party shall maintain books and records regarding its duties pursuant to this Agreement. Such books and records shall be available for inspection by the officers and agents of the other Party at all reasonable times. Section 7. The Parties agree to take all appropriate steps and execute any documents which may reasonably be necessary or convenient to implement the intent of this Agreement. Section 8. This Agreement may be amended from time to time by written instrument executed by both Parties. Section 9. No official, agent, or employee of the Successor Agency or the City, or members of the City Council, or members of the Successor Agency Board of Directors or Oversight Board shall be individually or personally liable for any payment hereunder in the event of any default or breach by the Successor Agency or the City, or for any amount which may otherwise become due to the City or Successor Agency, or successor thereto, or on any obligations under the terms of this Agreement. Section 10. This Agreement is made in the State of California under the Constitution and laws of the State of California, ancf is to be so construed. -3-152 1523 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have caused this Agreement to be executed by their duly authorized officers. ATTEST: Maureen Benson, Secretary ATTEST: Maureen Benson, City Clerk SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK By-------------- Steven Kueny, Executive Director CITY OF MOORPARK By-------------- Janice Parvin, Mayor -4-153 1624 EXHIBIT A Description of Projects 1. High Street Streetscape Project 2. Los Angeles Avenue Widening Project 3. Princeton A venue Widening Project 4. any other programs, projects and activities of benefit to the Project Area, so long as the program or project is determined by the City to be consistent with the bond covenants under the Indenture. -5-154 1725 Total cost DOWN TOWN A REA IMPROV EMENTS ESTI MATE ITE M DESCRIPTtON I UNITI Q UANTllY I UN IT I TOTAL I I I PRICE I Traffic Contro l LS 1 $5.000.00 $5,000.00 Remove & Replace Con c rete Srdew a lk SF 3149 $10.00 $31 488.00 Asphalt Repair SF 1598 $10.00 $15 ,960.00 Construct sidewalk includino Qrad ino a nd 6'' curb behind s idewa lk SF 18500 $30.00 $555,000.00 Remove & Repla ce Co n c rete Curb & Gutte r LF 23,510 .$40.00 $940,400.00 Remove & Repla ce Co n c rete Da maqed Driveway Tripp[111Q Hazard SF 3,.860 .$20.00 $77,200.00 Remove & Replace Co n crete Da m aged Dr~veway Not a Trlopina Hazard SF 1 ,920 .$20.00 $38,398.00 Remove & Replace Co n c rete Driveway fo.r ADA SF 15 750 $20.00 $315 ,000.00 Install Curb Ra mp EA 34 $2.000.00 $68,000.00 'nstaU Detectable W arning o n existing C urb Ramp EA 28: $500.00 $14,000.00 Remo.ve a nd Replace Cross Gutte r SF 87 .$20.00 $1.740.00 Tree Rem:0va l EA 15 $1 ,000.00 $15 ,000.00 Install Street Lioht EA 1 $20,000.00 $20,000.00 Storm Dra in tmprovements Millard St LS 1 $250,000.00 $250,000.00 Provide Coord ination LS 1 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 Release on Contract LS 1 $1 .00 $1 .00 Pro &ect tota l $2,352, 185.00 15% Continaencv $2,705,0 12.75 ATTACHMENT 2 26 Area A 27 Area A 28 Area A 29 Tota I Cost Area A DOW NTOWN AREA A IMPROVEMENTS ESTIMATE ITE M D ESCRIPT~ON UNIT QUANTllY I UNIT I TOTAL PRIC E Traffi c Contro l LS 1 $1 ,000_00 $1,000_00 Rem ove & Repliace Con crete Sidew a lk SF 590 $10_00 $5,900_00 Rem ove & Repllace Co n c rete C urb & Gutter LF 118 $40_00 $4 720 _00 Rem o,ve & Replace Co nc rete Curb Ramp EA s $2000_00 $10000_00 Rem o,ve and Replace Asphatt SF 1,596 $10_00 $15 ,960_00 Prov ide Goo rdinatID 11 L S 1 $1,000_00 $1 ,000_00 Rerease on Co n.tract L S 1 $1 _00 $1 _00 P ro &ect total $3B,SB1 _00 15% C ont inqencv $44,368-15 30 Area B 31 Area B Streets needing curb and gutter. 3rd, Bard, Flory, Dorothy, Ruth, 2nd, Sarah, Roberts, Esther, Sherman, Harry St. 32 Area B Driveway replacement In the path of travel 33 Area B Driveway replacement In the path of travel 34 Area B Driveway replacement Not in the path of travel 35 Area B New Driveway in the path of travel 36 Area B Replace existing curb ramp 37 Area B Add Detectable Warning 38 Area B Storm drain on Millard St 'LUY 01 1"\'JOOrparK Capital Improvement Program Location Map Exltrpnq omrn: • • • • ~-··· • • ·~~-~__. ..... i t--+-+---;H Sherman Ave Code No. 504 . Account No. 8065 _ Project Description Construction of a storm drain similar in fonction to that identified in the City's Master Plan of Drainage as the "Frccmont Drain", located north of the intersection of Los Angeles Avenue and -MiJ!ard Street The current design concept for this project anticipate s a· stonn drain running easterly along the north side of Los Angeles Avenue from the existing Los Angeles Avenue culvert to Millard Street,. and the n northerly along the east side of Millard Street for a sbort d jstance. Project Funding Schedule Total Cost: _.:::;S.2=5"'0._,,""'00::..:0~. Prior Yrs EY..Uill FY 14/15 .EY.lli!.2 P Y 16117 .E.Y.11ill. F Y18/J 9 D:..l2ml Design 25,000 R-0-W Co-nsUuction 200,00(} lns~ecHon 25,000 Total 0 0 0 250,000 0 0 0 (I Funding Sources Source fii2.!:..Y!§ FY 13/14 u..J.1ill. FY 15116 FY 1611 7 .EYJ.lll.Jl FY 18119 FV19/20 Underermined 250,000 Total 0 0 0 250,0DO 0 0 0 0 39 Area B DOW NTOW N AR EA B llVl PROVErvl ENTS ESTIMATE ITE M D ESCR IPTIO N UNIT Q UANTITY UN IT I TOTAL PRIC E T raffic Co ntrol LS 1 $1,000.00 $1,000.00 Remove & Repla ce Conc rete Side w a lk SF 18 03 $10.00 $1 8 ,028.00 Remove & Replace Co nc rete C urb & Gutte r LF 2 1925 $40.00 $877,000.00 Re m ove & Replace Co nc rete D a maqed Drive w a y Apro n T rrppin:a Hazard SF 3 ,860 $20.00 $77 2 00.00 Rem ove & Re place Con c rete Da m a-Qed Orivewav Apro n No t T rippinq Hazard SF 1,920 $20.00 $38,396.00 Rem ove & Re place Co nc rete C urb Ram p EA 2 1 $2,000.00 $42 000.00 Install D etectab ~e W am lng on e xisting Curb R amp EA 28 $500.00 $14 ,000.00 ~nsta l f St reet Liqht ( s+ I f)a. ... t( EA 1 $20,000.00 $20 ,000.00 Storm D ra tn Improve m ents Mil!ard St LS 1 $250,000.00 $250,000.00 Prov ide Co.ord inatio n L S 1 $1 ,000.00 $1,000.00 P ro rect tot al $1,338 624.00 15% Ccmtirngenc v $1,539 ,4 17 .60 40 Area C 41 Area C DOWN~OWN AREA C IMPROVEMENTS ESTIMATE ITEM DESCRIPTION I PA~~~-NTI UN IT I 'QUANTITY I Traffic Co ntro I LS 1 Remove & Rep !ace Co ncrete Sidewalk SF 504 Rem ove & Replace Co ncrete Curb & Gutter LF '91 Prov ide Coo rdr nat&o n LS 1 Pro ject tota l 15% Continq encv UNIT I PmCE $1,000.00 $10.00 $40.00 $1 ,000.00 T OTAL $1,000.00 $5,1040.00 $3,640.00 $1000.00 $10680.00 $12,2&2.00 42 Area D 43 Area D Install new sidewalks, driveways, and curb and gutter 44 Area D New Driveway in the path of travel 45 Area D DOW NTOW N AREA D IMPROV E ME NTS ESTI MATE ITEM DESCRIP TIO N PAYM E NT UNT QUANTITY UN IT TOTAL REF P RtCE T ramc Co 11t ro I LS 1 $1,000.00 $1,000.00 Constru:ct s idewalk inc l11dinQ q radinQ a nd 6'' c m b behind s idewalk SF 18 500 $30.00 $555000.00 Remove & Replace Co nc rete C urb & Gutter LF 1,360 $40.00 $54400.00 Remove & Replace Con crete D rivew a v Apron fo r ADA S F 15,75 0 $20.00 $315 ODD.OD Remove & Replace Concrete C urb Ramp EA g $2 000.00 $16000.00 Remove and Replace Cross Gutter SF 87 $20.00 $1 740.00 T ree Removal EA 15 $1 ,000.00 $15 ,000.00 P ro v ide Coo rdinat io n LS 1 $1 ,000.00 $1 000.00 ProV8ct total $959 14000 . , - 15% Continq enc v $1,103 0 11.00 46 Area E 47 Area E DOWN TOWN A REA E IMPROV EMENTS ESTIMATE ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT I QUANT llTY I UN IT I TOTAL PRICE Traffic Gontro I LS 1 $1,000.00 $1,000.00 Rem ove & Repla ce Co nc rete S idew a lk SF 252 $10.00 $2,520.00 Rem ove & Replace Con c rete C urb .& Gutte r LF 16 $40.00 $640.00 Provide Coo rd in:afa:m L S 1 $1,000.00 $1 ,000.00 Proie d tota l $5,160.00 15 % Continq encv $5,934.00 48 Accessibility Survey Prepared By Avenida Colonia - Virginia Colony Place to Nogales Avenue Virginia Colony Place to Nogales Avenue Moorpark, CA 93021 Date of Inspection 1/25/2018 Disability Access Consultants City of Moorpark 49 Finding On-Site Finding Not Found Recommendation See RecommendationRecommendation Costing Info (Estimated) Code Reference Record Number 139981 The curb ramp does not provide a detectable warning surface which includes truncated domes. Provide compliant detectable warnings to surface. CA 11B-406.5.12 Provide detectable warning to surface Northwest Corner of Virginia Colony Place @ 34.287233404097, - 118.858309239149 $248 Curb Ramp : No Detectable Warnings Progress NoneProgress Projected DateActual Date Actual Cost NonePriority Comments No Comments $0.00 Curb Ramps - Exterior : Curb Ramp NoneResolution Contractor NoneAssignment 0New Value Designated Staff Avenida Colonia - Virginia Colony Place to Nogales Avenue Page 2 of 28 50 Finding On-Site Finding 9.20 percent Recommendation Up to 2.08 percentRecommendation Costing Info (Estimated) Code Reference Record Number 139982 The cross slope is greater than allowed. Provide a compliant curb ramp. ADA 402, 406.1, 405.3,CA 11B-406.5.7 Install curb ramp Northwest Corner of Virginia Colony Place @ 34.287233404097, - 118.858309239149 $1,300 Curb Ramp : Curb Ramp - Cross Slope Progress NoneProgress Projected DateActual Date Actual Cost NonePriority Comments No Comments $0.00 Curb Ramps - Exterior : Curb Ramp NoneResolution Contractor NoneAssignment 0New Value Designated Staff Avenida Colonia - Virginia Colony Place to Nogales Avenue Page 3 of 28 51 Finding On-Site Finding 0.75 inches Recommendation Up to 0.50 inchesRecommendation Costing Info (Estimated) Code Reference Record Number 139983 The transition from the bottom of the curb ramp to the walk, gutter, or street is abrupt. Patch the transition area at the bottom of the curb ramp so that the transition is flush and free of abrupt changes. ADA 406.2, 406.5.8 Patch lip at curb ramp Northwest Corner of Virginia Colony Place @ 34.287233404097, - 118.858309239149 Bottom Landing $255 Curb Ramp , Landings And Transitions : Bottom Landing Change in Level Progress NoneProgress Projected DateActual Date Actual Cost NonePriority Comments No Comments $0.00 Curb Ramps - Exterior : Curb Ramp , Landings And Transitions NoneResolution Contractor NoneAssignment 0New Value Designated Staff Avenida Colonia - Virginia Colony Place to Nogales Avenue Page 4 of 28 52 Finding On-Site Finding 3.30 percent Recommendation Up to 2.08 percentRecommendation Costing Info (Estimated) Code Reference Record Number 139984 The slope at the top landing is greater than allowed. Provide a top landing surface that does not exceed the maximum slope and cross slope. Provide a sufficient maneuvering clearance that does not accumulate water. ADA 406.4, 402.2,CA 11B-406.5.3 Provide compliant landing Northwest Corner of Virginia Colony Place @ 34.287233404097, - 118.858309239149 Top Landing $1,260 Curb Ramp , Landings and Transitions : Top Landing Slope Progress NoneProgress Projected DateActual Date Actual Cost NonePriority Comments No Comments $0.00 Curb Ramps - Exterior : Curb Ramp , Landings and Transitions NoneResolution Contractor NoneAssignment 0New Value Designated Staff Avenida Colonia - Virginia Colony Place to Nogales Avenue Page 5 of 28 53 Finding On-Site Finding Not Found Recommendation See RecommendationRecommendation Costing Info (Estimated) Code Reference Record Number 139985 The curb ramp does not provide a detectable warning surface which includes truncated domes. Provide compliant detectable warnings to surface. CA 11B-406.5.12 Provide detectable warning to surface Southwest Corner of Virginia Colony Place @ 34.287233404097, - 118.858309239149 $248 Curb Ramp : No Detectable Warnings Progress NoneProgress Projected DateActual Date Actual Cost NonePriority Comments No Comments $0.00 Curb Ramps - Exterior : Curb Ramp NoneResolution Contractor NoneAssignment 0New Value Designated Staff Avenida Colonia - Virginia Colony Place to Nogales Avenue Page 6 of 28 54 Finding On-Site Finding 18.80 percent Recommendation Up to 8.33 percentRecommendation Costing Info (Estimated) Code Reference Record Number 139986 The running slope is greater than allowed. Provide a compliant curb ramp. ADA 406, 406.1, 405.2,CA 11B-406.2.2 Install curb ramp Southwest Corner of Virginia Colony Place @ 34.287233404097, - 118.858309239149 $1,300 Curb Ramp : Curb Ramp Slope Progress NoneProgress Projected DateActual Date Actual Cost NonePriority Comments No Comments $0.00 Curb Ramps - Exterior : Curb Ramp NoneResolution Contractor NoneAssignment 0New Value Designated Staff Avenida Colonia - Virginia Colony Place to Nogales Avenue Page 7 of 28 55 Finding On-Site Finding 0.75 inches Recommendation Up to 0.25 inchesRecommendation Costing Info (Estimated) Code Reference Record Number 139980 There is a change in elevation greater than recommended value. Ensure that the change in elevation is within the recommended value. ADA 206, 302 Remove tripping hazards North Side Change in Level East of Nogales Avenue @ 34.286728130632, -118.861092031002 $198 Sidewalks , Change in Level : Change in Level Non Beveled Progress NoneProgress Projected DateActual Date Actual Cost NonePriority Comments No Comments $0.00 Sidewalks - Exterior : Sidewalks , Change in Level NoneResolution Contractor NoneAssignment 0New Value Designated Staff Avenida Colonia - Virginia Colony Place to Nogales Avenue Page 8 of 28 56 Finding On-Site Finding 3.00 percent for 32.00 feet Recommendation Up to 2.08 percentRecommendation Costing Info (Estimated) Code Reference Record Number 139978 Sidewalk cross slope is not compliant. Repave the sidewalk surface with the recommended cross slope. ADA 206, 302,CA 11B-403.3 Repave surface North Side Sidewalk East of Nogales Avenue @ 34.286621756884, -118.861648589373 $1,092 Sidewalks , Surface : Cross Slope Progress NoneProgress Projected DateActual Date Actual Cost NonePriority Comments No Comments $0.00 Sidewalks - Exterior : Sidewalks , Surface NoneResolution Contractor NoneAssignment 0New Value Designated Staff Avenida Colonia - Virginia Colony Place to Nogales Avenue Page 9 of 28 57 Finding On-Site Finding 3.70 percent for 207.00 feet Recommendation Up to 2.08 percentRecommendation Costing Info (Estimated) Code Reference Record Number 139976 Sidewalk cross slope is not compliant. Repave the sidewalk surface with the recommended cross slope. ADA 206, 302,CA 11B-403.3 Repave surface North Side Sidewalk East of Nogales Avenue @ 34.286640593912, -118.861497044563 $1,092 Sidewalks , Surface : Cross Slope Progress NoneProgress Projected DateActual Date Actual Cost NonePriority Comments No Comments $0.00 Sidewalks - Exterior : Sidewalks , Surface NoneResolution Contractor NoneAssignment 0New Value Designated Staff Avenida Colonia - Virginia Colony Place to Nogales Avenue Page 10 of 28 58 Finding On-Site Finding Not Compliant Recommendation See RecommendationRecommendation Costing Info (Estimated) Code Reference Record Number 139977 Ground surface has an opening that is not compliant. Make sure that the surface opening does not allow passage of a sphere more than ½ inch in diameter. ADA 302 North Side Sidewalk East of Nogales Avenue @ 34.286640593912, -118.861497044563 Unassigned Sidewalks : Opening Progress NoneProgress Projected DateActual Date Actual Cost NonePriority Comments No Comments $0.00 Sidewalks - Exterior : Sidewalks NoneResolution Contractor NoneAssignment 0New Value Designated Staff Avenida Colonia - Virginia Colony Place to Nogales Avenue Page 11 of 28 59 Finding On-Site Finding 3.50 percent for 493.00 feet Recommendation Up to 2.08 percentRecommendation Costing Info (Estimated) Code Reference Record Number 139974 Sidewalk cross slope is not compliant. Repave the sidewalk surface with the recommended cross slope. ADA 206, 302,CA 11B-403.3 Repave surface North Side Sidewalk East of Nogales Avenue @ 34.287014009413, -118.859847486019 $1,092 Sidewalks , Surface : Cross Slope Progress NoneProgress Projected DateActual Date Actual Cost NonePriority Comments No Comments $0.00 Sidewalks - Exterior : Sidewalks , Surface NoneResolution Contractor NoneAssignment 0New Value Designated Staff Avenida Colonia - Virginia Colony Place to Nogales Avenue Page 12 of 28 60 Finding On-Site Finding Not Compliant Recommendation See RecommendationRecommendation Costing Info (Estimated) Code Reference Record Number 139975 Ground surface has an opening that is not compliant. Make sure that the surface opening does not allow passage of a sphere more than ½ inch in diameter. ADA 302 North Side Sidewalk East of Nogales Avenue @ 34.287014009413, -118.859847486019 Unassigned Sidewalks : Opening Progress NoneProgress Projected DateActual Date Actual Cost NonePriority Comments No Comments $0.00 Sidewalks - Exterior : Sidewalks NoneResolution Contractor NoneAssignment 0New Value Designated Staff Avenida Colonia - Virginia Colony Place to Nogales Avenue Page 13 of 28 61 Finding On-Site Finding 44.00 inches Recommendation At least 48.00 inchesRecommendation Costing Info (Estimated) Code Reference Record Number 139979 Sidewalk width at the obstruction is not compliant. Sidewalk width at the obstruction shall have the recommended value. ADA 206, 302, 403.5.1,CA 11B-403.5 North Side Sign East of Nogales Avenue @ 34.287341993174, -118.858317285776 $1,260 Sidewalks , Hazards & Gratings : Sidewalk Width at Obstruction Progress NoneProgress Projected DateActual Date Actual Cost NonePriority Comments No Comments $0.00 Sidewalks - Exterior : Sidewalks , Hazards & Gratings NoneResolution Contractor NoneAssignment 0New Value Designated Staff Avenida Colonia - Virginia Colony Place to Nogales Avenue Page 14 of 28 62 Finding On-Site Finding Not Found Recommendation See RecommendationRecommendation Costing Info (Estimated) Code Reference Record Number 157034 There is no 60X60 turn area at every 200 feet. Provide a 60X60 turn every 200 feet on the sidewalk. ADA 206, 302 North Side @ 34.286621756884, -118.861648589373 $2,400 Sidewalks : 60X60 Turn Area Progress NoneProgress Projected DateActual Date Actual Cost NonePriority Comments No Comments $0.00 Sidewalks - Exterior : Sidewalks NoneResolution Contractor NoneAssignment 0New Value Designated Staff Avenida Colonia - Virginia Colony Place to Nogales Avenue Page 15 of 28 63 Finding On-Site Finding 0.75 inches Recommendation Up to 0.25 inchesRecommendation Costing Info (Estimated) Code Reference Record Number 139997 There is a change in elevation greater than recommended value. Ensure that the change in elevation is within the recommended value. ADA 206, 302 Remove tripping hazards South Side Change in Level West of Virginia Colony Place @ 34.286615108520, - 118.861832320690 $198 Sidewalks , Change in Level : Change in Level Non Beveled Progress NoneProgress Projected DateActual Date Actual Cost NonePriority Comments No Comments $0.00 Sidewalks - Exterior : Sidewalks , Change in Level NoneResolution Contractor NoneAssignment 0New Value Designated Staff Avenida Colonia - Virginia Colony Place to Nogales Avenue Page 16 of 28 64 Finding On-Site Finding 1.00 inches Recommendation Up to 0.25 inchesRecommendation Costing Info (Estimated) Code Reference Record Number 139995 There is a change in elevation greater than recommended value. Ensure that the change in elevation is within the recommended value. ADA 206, 302 Remove tripping hazards South Side Change in Level West of Virginia Colony Place @ 34.287156948439, - 118.858624398708 $198 Sidewalks , Change in Level : Change in Level Non Beveled Progress NoneProgress Projected DateActual Date Actual Cost NonePriority Comments No Comments $0.00 Sidewalks - Exterior : Sidewalks , Change in Level NoneResolution Contractor NoneAssignment 0New Value Designated Staff Avenida Colonia - Virginia Colony Place to Nogales Avenue Page 17 of 28 65 Finding On-Site Finding 65.00 inches Recommendation At least 80.00 inchesRecommendation Costing Info (Estimated) Code Reference Record Number 139996 Overhead obstruction height is not compliant. Provide a compliant vertical clearance height. ADA 206, 307.4,CA 11B-307.4 South Side Guy Wire West of Virginia Colony Place @ 34.287207918886, -118.858399093151 Unassigned Sidewalks , Hazards & Gratings : Overhead Obstruction Height Progress NoneProgress Projected DateActual Date Actual Cost NonePriority Comments No Comments $0.00 Sidewalks - Exterior : Sidewalks , Hazards & Gratings NoneResolution Contractor NoneAssignment 0New Value Designated Staff Avenida Colonia - Virginia Colony Place to Nogales Avenue Page 18 of 28 66 Finding On-Site Finding 44.00 inches Recommendation At least 48.00 inchesRecommendation Costing Info (Estimated) Code Reference Record Number 139998 Sidewalk width at the obstruction is not compliant. Sidewalk width at the obstruction shall have the recommended value. ADA 206, 302, 403.5.1,CA 11B-403.5 South Side Guy Wire West of Virginia Colony Place @ 34.287207918886, -118.858399093151 $1,260 Sidewalks , Hazards & Gratings : Sidewalk Width at Obstruction Progress NoneProgress Projected DateActual Date Actual Cost NonePriority Comments No Comments $0.00 Sidewalks - Exterior : Sidewalks , Hazards & Gratings NoneResolution Contractor NoneAssignment 0New Value Designated Staff Avenida Colonia - Virginia Colony Place to Nogales Avenue Page 19 of 28 67 Finding On-Site Finding 3.60 percent for 100.00 feet Recommendation Up to 2.08 percentRecommendation Costing Info (Estimated) Code Reference Record Number 139993 Sidewalk cross slope is not compliant. Repave the sidewalk surface with the recommended cross slope. ADA 206, 302,CA 11B-403.3 Repave surface South Side Sidewalk West of Virginia Colony Place @ 34.286495437883, -118.861580193043 $1,092 Sidewalks , Surface : Cross Slope Progress NoneProgress Projected DateActual Date Actual Cost NonePriority Comments No Comments $0.00 Sidewalks - Exterior : Sidewalks , Surface NoneResolution Contractor NoneAssignment 0New Value Designated Staff Avenida Colonia - Virginia Colony Place to Nogales Avenue Page 20 of 28 68 Finding On-Site Finding Not Compliant Recommendation See RecommendationRecommendation Costing Info (Estimated) Code Reference Record Number 139988 Ground surface has an opening that is not compliant. Make sure that the surface opening does not allow passage of a sphere more than ½ inch in diameter. ADA 302 South Side Sidewalk West of Virginia Colony Place @ 34.286564137714, -118.861348181963 Unassigned Sidewalks : Opening Progress NoneProgress Projected DateActual Date Actual Cost NonePriority Comments No Comments $0.00 Sidewalks - Exterior : Sidewalks NoneResolution Contractor NoneAssignment 0New Value Designated Staff Avenida Colonia - Virginia Colony Place to Nogales Avenue Page 21 of 28 69 Finding On-Site Finding 4.80 percent for 58.00 feet Recommendation Up to 2.08 percentRecommendation Costing Info (Estimated) Code Reference Record Number 139992 Sidewalk cross slope is not compliant. Repave the sidewalk surface with the recommended cross slope. ADA 206, 302,CA 11B-403.3 Repave surface South Side Sidewalk West of Virginia Colony Place @ 34.286658322875, -118.860953897238 $1,092 Sidewalks , Surface : Cross Slope Progress NoneProgress Projected DateActual Date Actual Cost NonePriority Comments No Comments $0.00 Sidewalks - Exterior : Sidewalks , Surface NoneResolution Contractor NoneAssignment 0New Value Designated Staff Avenida Colonia - Virginia Colony Place to Nogales Avenue Page 22 of 28 70 Finding On-Site Finding 3.50 percent for 781.00 feet Recommendation Up to 2.08 percentRecommendation Costing Info (Estimated) Code Reference Record Number 139989 Sidewalk cross slope is not compliant. Repave the sidewalk surface with the recommended cross slope. ADA 206, 302,CA 11B-403.3 Repave surface South Side Sidewalk West of Virginia Colony Place @ 34.287207918886, -118.858399093151 $1,092 Sidewalks , Surface : Cross Slope Progress NoneProgress Projected DateActual Date Actual Cost NonePriority Comments No Comments $0.00 Sidewalks - Exterior : Sidewalks , Surface NoneResolution Contractor NoneAssignment 0New Value Designated Staff Avenida Colonia - Virginia Colony Place to Nogales Avenue Page 23 of 28 71 Finding On-Site Finding 7.50 percent for 6.00 feet Recommendation Up to 5.00 percentRecommendation Costing Info (Estimated) Code Reference Record Number 139990 Sidewalk running slope is not compliant. Repave the sidewalk surface with the recommended running slope. ADA 206, 302 Repave surface South Side Sidewalk West of Virginia Colony Place @ 34.287207918886, -118.858399093151 $1,184 Sidewalks , Surface : Running Slope Progress NoneProgress Projected DateActual Date Actual Cost NonePriority Comments No Comments $0.00 Sidewalks - Exterior : Sidewalks , Surface NoneResolution Contractor NoneAssignment 0New Value Designated Staff Avenida Colonia - Virginia Colony Place to Nogales Avenue Page 24 of 28 72 Finding On-Site Finding Not Compliant Recommendation See RecommendationRecommendation Costing Info (Estimated) Code Reference Record Number 139991 Ground surface has an opening that is not compliant. Make sure that the surface opening does not allow passage of a sphere more than ½ inch in diameter. ADA 302 South Side Sidewalk West of Virginia Colony Place @ 34.287207918886, -118.858399093151 Unassigned Sidewalks : Opening Progress NoneProgress Projected DateActual Date Actual Cost NonePriority Comments No Comments $0.00 Sidewalks - Exterior : Sidewalks NoneResolution Contractor NoneAssignment 0New Value Designated Staff Avenida Colonia - Virginia Colony Place to Nogales Avenue Page 25 of 28 73 Finding On-Site Finding 44.00 inches Recommendation At least 48.00 inchesRecommendation Costing Info (Estimated) Code Reference Record Number 139994 Sidewalk width at the obstruction is not compliant. Sidewalk width at the obstruction shall have the recommended value. ADA 206, 302, 403.5.1,CA 11B-403.5 South Side Utility Pole West of Virginia Colony Place @ 34.286658322875, -118.860953897238 $1,260 Sidewalks , Hazards & Gratings : Sidewalk Width at Obstruction Progress NoneProgress Projected DateActual Date Actual Cost NonePriority Comments No Comments $0.00 Sidewalks - Exterior : Sidewalks , Hazards & Gratings NoneResolution Contractor NoneAssignment 0New Value Designated Staff Avenida Colonia - Virginia Colony Place to Nogales Avenue Page 26 of 28 74 Finding On-Site Finding Not Found Recommendation See RecommendationRecommendation Costing Info (Estimated) Code Reference Record Number 157035 There is no 60X60 turn area at every 200 feet. Provide a 60X60 turn every 200 feet on the sidewalk. ADA 206, 302 South Side @ 34.287234512150, -118.858322650194 $2,400 Sidewalks : 60X60 Turn Area Progress NoneProgress Projected DateActual Date Actual Cost NonePriority Comments No Comments $0.00 Sidewalks - Exterior : Sidewalks NoneResolution Contractor NoneAssignment 0New Value Designated Staff Avenida Colonia - Virginia Colony Place to Nogales Avenue Page 27 of 28 75 Prepared By *Estimated Facility Total: *Estimated facility total is for estimating purposes only and does not represent total construction, repair totals or design fees. Prepared Using $21,521 Avenida Colonia - Virginia Colony Place to Nogales Avenue Virginia Colony Place to Nogales Avenue Moorpark, CA 93021 Date of Inspection 1/25/2018 Disability Access Consultants Avenida Colonia - Virginia Colony Place to Nogales Avenue Page 28 of 28 76 Accessibility Survey Prepared By Nogales Avenue - Princeton Avenue to Avenida Colonia Princeton Avenue to Avenida Colonia Moorpark, CA 93021 Date of Inspection 1/25/2018 Disability Access Consultants City of Moorpark 77 Finding On-Site Finding Not Found Recommendation See RecommendationRecommendation Costing Info (Estimated) Code Reference Record Number 140015 The curb ramp does not provide a detectable warning surface which includes truncated domes. Provide compliant detectable warnings to surface. CA 11B-406.5.12 Provide detectable warning to surface West Side North of Avenida Colonia - 1st @ 34.286864421800, - 118.861875236034 $248 Curb Ramp : No Detectable Warnings Progress NoneProgress Projected DateActual Date Actual Cost NonePriority Comments No Comments $0.00 Curb Ramps - Exterior : Curb Ramp NoneResolution Contractor NoneAssignment 0New Value Designated Staff Nogales Avenue - Princeton Avenue to Avenida Colonia Page 2 of 31 78 Finding On-Site Finding 13.10 percent Recommendation Up to 8.33 percentRecommendation Costing Info (Estimated) Code Reference Record Number 140016 The running slope is greater than allowed. Provide a compliant curb ramp. ADA 406, 406.1, 405.2,CA 11B-406.2.2 Install curb ramp West Side North of Avenida Colonia - 1st @ 34.286864421800, - 118.861875236034 $1,300 Curb Ramp : Curb Ramp Slope Progress NoneProgress Projected DateActual Date Actual Cost NonePriority Comments No Comments $0.00 Curb Ramps - Exterior : Curb Ramp NoneResolution Contractor NoneAssignment 0New Value Designated Staff Nogales Avenue - Princeton Avenue to Avenida Colonia Page 3 of 31 79 Finding On-Site Finding 13.30 percent Recommendation Up to 10.00 percentRecommendation Costing Info (Estimated) Code Reference Record Number 140017 The slope of the curb ramp side flare is greater than allowed. Provide curb ramp side flares with a compliant slope. ADA 406, 406.3,CA 11B-406.2.2 Install flared sides West Side North of Avenida Colonia - 1st @ 34.286864421800, - 118.861875236034 $1,300 Curb Ramp : Side Flare Slope Progress NoneProgress Projected DateActual Date Actual Cost NonePriority Comments No Comments $0.00 Curb Ramps - Exterior : Curb Ramp NoneResolution Contractor NoneAssignment 0New Value Designated Staff Nogales Avenue - Princeton Avenue to Avenida Colonia Page 4 of 31 80 Finding On-Site Finding 0.62 inches Recommendation Up to 0.50 inchesRecommendation Costing Info (Estimated) Code Reference Record Number 140018 The transition from the bottom of the curb ramp to the walk, gutter, or street is abrupt. Patch the transition area at the bottom of the curb ramp so that the transition is flush and free of abrupt changes. ADA 406.2, 406.5.8 Patch lip at curb ramp West Side North of Avenida Colonia - 1st @ 34.286864421800, - 118.861875236034 Bottom Landing $255 Curb Ramp , Landings And Transitions : Bottom Landing Change in Level Progress NoneProgress Projected DateActual Date Actual Cost NonePriority Comments No Comments $0.00 Curb Ramps - Exterior : Curb Ramp , Landings And Transitions NoneResolution Contractor NoneAssignment 0New Value Designated Staff Nogales Avenue - Princeton Avenue to Avenida Colonia Page 5 of 31 81 Finding On-Site Finding 4.90 percent Recommendation Up to 2.08 percentRecommendation Costing Info (Estimated) Code Reference Record Number 140019 The slope at the top landing is greater than allowed. Provide a top landing surface that does not exceed the maximum slope and cross slope. Provide a sufficient maneuvering clearance that does not accumulate water. ADA 406.4, 402.2,CA 11B-406.5.3 Provide compliant landing West Side North of Avenida Colonia - 1st @ 34.286864421800, - 118.861875236034 Top Landing $1,260 Curb Ramp , Landings and Transitions : Top Landing Slope Progress NoneProgress Projected DateActual Date Actual Cost NonePriority Comments No Comments $0.00 Curb Ramps - Exterior : Curb Ramp , Landings and Transitions NoneResolution Contractor NoneAssignment 0New Value Designated Staff Nogales Avenue - Princeton Avenue to Avenida Colonia Page 6 of 31 82 Finding On-Site Finding 44.00 inches Recommendation At least 48.00 inchesRecommendation Costing Info (Estimated) Code Reference Record Number 140020 There is not enough top landing clear length. Provide a level top landing with enough clear length. ADA 406, 406.4,CA 11B-406.5.3 Provide compliant landing West Side North of Avenida Colonia - 1st @ 34.286864421800, - 118.861875236034 Top Landing $240 Curb Ramp , Landings and Transitions : Top Landing Clear Length - Landings Progress NoneProgress Projected DateActual Date Actual Cost NonePriority Comments No Comments $0.00 Curb Ramps - Exterior : Curb Ramp , Landings and Transitions NoneResolution Contractor NoneAssignment 0New Value Designated Staff Nogales Avenue - Princeton Avenue to Avenida Colonia Page 7 of 31 83 Finding On-Site Finding Not Found Recommendation See RecommendationRecommendation Costing Info (Estimated) Code Reference Record Number 139999 The curb ramp does not provide a detectable warning surface which includes truncated domes. Provide compliant detectable warnings to surface. CA 11B-406.5.12 Provide detectable warning to surface West Side North of Avenida Colonia - 2nd @ 34.286987416079, - 118.861875236034 $248 Curb Ramp : No Detectable Warnings Progress NoneProgress Projected DateActual Date Actual Cost NonePriority Comments No Comments $0.00 Curb Ramps - Exterior : Curb Ramp NoneResolution Contractor NoneAssignment 0New Value Designated Staff Nogales Avenue - Princeton Avenue to Avenida Colonia Page 8 of 31 84 Finding On-Site Finding 14.30 percent Recommendation Up to 8.33 percentRecommendation Costing Info (Estimated) Code Reference Record Number 140000 The running slope is greater than allowed. Provide a compliant curb ramp. ADA 406, 406.1, 405.2,CA 11B-406.2.2 Install curb ramp West Side North of Avenida Colonia - 2nd @ 34.286987416079, - 118.861875236034 $1,300 Curb Ramp : Curb Ramp Slope Progress NoneProgress Projected DateActual Date Actual Cost NonePriority Comments No Comments $0.00 Curb Ramps - Exterior : Curb Ramp NoneResolution Contractor NoneAssignment 0New Value Designated Staff Nogales Avenue - Princeton Avenue to Avenida Colonia Page 9 of 31 85 Finding On-Site Finding 4.50 percent Recommendation Up to 2.08 percentRecommendation Costing Info (Estimated) Code Reference Record Number 140001 The cross slope is greater than allowed. Provide a compliant curb ramp. ADA 402, 406.1, 405.3,CA 11B-406.5.7 Install curb ramp West Side North of Avenida Colonia - 2nd @ 34.286987416079, - 118.861875236034 $1,300 Curb Ramp : Curb Ramp - Cross Slope Progress NoneProgress Projected DateActual Date Actual Cost NonePriority Comments No Comments $0.00 Curb Ramps - Exterior : Curb Ramp NoneResolution Contractor NoneAssignment 0New Value Designated Staff Nogales Avenue - Princeton Avenue to Avenida Colonia Page 10 of 31 86 Finding On-Site Finding 14.70 percent Recommendation Up to 10.00 percentRecommendation Costing Info (Estimated) Code Reference Record Number 140002 The slope of the curb ramp side flare is greater than allowed. Provide curb ramp side flares with a compliant slope. ADA 406, 406.3,CA 11B-406.2.2 Install flared sides West Side North of Avenida Colonia - 2nd @ 34.286987416079, - 118.861875236034 $1,300 Curb Ramp : Side Flare Slope Progress NoneProgress Projected DateActual Date Actual Cost NonePriority Comments No Comments $0.00 Curb Ramps - Exterior : Curb Ramp NoneResolution Contractor NoneAssignment 0New Value Designated Staff Nogales Avenue - Princeton Avenue to Avenida Colonia Page 11 of 31 87 Finding On-Site Finding Not Beveled Recommendation See RecommendationRecommendation Costing Info (Estimated) Code Reference Record Number 140003 The transition from the bottom of the curb ramp to the walk, gutter, or street is abrupt. Patch the transition area at the bottom of the curb ramp so that the transition is flush and free of abrupt changes. ADA 406.2,CA 11B-406.5.8 Patch lip at curb ramp West Side North of Avenida Colonia - 2nd @ 34.286987416079, - 118.861875236034 Bottom Landing $255 Curb Ramp , Landings and Transitions : Bottom Landing Change in Level - Curb Ramps Progress NoneProgress Projected DateActual Date Actual Cost NonePriority Comments No Comments $0.00 Curb Ramps - Exterior : Curb Ramp , Landings and Transitions NoneResolution Contractor NoneAssignment 0New Value Designated Staff Nogales Avenue - Princeton Avenue to Avenida Colonia Page 12 of 31 88 Finding On-Site Finding 6.30 percent Recommendation Up to 2.08 percentRecommendation Costing Info (Estimated) Code Reference Record Number 140004 The slope at the top landing is greater than allowed. Provide a top landing surface that does not exceed the maximum slope and cross slope. Provide a sufficient maneuvering clearance that does not accumulate water. ADA 406.4, 402.2,CA 11B-406.5.3 Provide compliant landing West Side North of Avenida Colonia - 2nd @ 34.286987416079, - 118.861875236034 Top Landing $1,260 Curb Ramp , Landings and Transitions : Top Landing Slope Progress NoneProgress Projected DateActual Date Actual Cost NonePriority Comments No Comments $0.00 Curb Ramps - Exterior : Curb Ramp , Landings and Transitions NoneResolution Contractor NoneAssignment 0New Value Designated Staff Nogales Avenue - Princeton Avenue to Avenida Colonia Page 13 of 31 89 Finding On-Site Finding 36.00 inches Recommendation At least 48.00 inchesRecommendation Costing Info (Estimated) Code Reference Record Number 140005 There is not enough top landing clear length. Provide a level top landing with enough clear length. ADA 406, 406.4,CA 11B-406.5.3 Provide compliant landing West Side North of Avenida Colonia - 2nd @ 34.286987416079, - 118.861875236034 Top Landing $240 Curb Ramp , Landings and Transitions : Top Landing Clear Length - Landings Progress NoneProgress Projected DateActual Date Actual Cost NonePriority Comments No Comments $0.00 Curb Ramps - Exterior : Curb Ramp , Landings and Transitions NoneResolution Contractor NoneAssignment 0New Value Designated Staff Nogales Avenue - Princeton Avenue to Avenida Colonia Page 14 of 31 90 Finding On-Site Finding 38.00 inches Recommendation At least 48.00 inchesRecommendation Costing Info (Estimated) Code Reference Record Number 140024 Sidewalk width at the obstruction is not compliant. Sidewalk width at the obstruction shall have the recommended value. ADA 206, 302, 403.5.1,CA 11B-403.5 East Side Bush South of Princeton Avenue @ 34.286996280525, -118.861726373434 $1,260 Sidewalks , Hazards & Gratings : Sidewalk Width at Obstruction Progress NoneProgress Projected DateActual Date Actual Cost NonePriority Comments No Comments $0.00 Sidewalks - Exterior : Sidewalks , Hazards & Gratings NoneResolution Contractor NoneAssignment 0New Value Designated Staff Nogales Avenue - Princeton Avenue to Avenida Colonia Page 15 of 31 91 Finding On-Site Finding 24.00 inches Recommendation At least 48.00 inchesRecommendation Costing Info (Estimated) Code Reference Record Number 140025 Sidewalk width at the obstruction is not compliant. Sidewalk width at the obstruction shall have the recommended value. ADA 206, 302, 403.5.1,CA 11B-403.5 East Side Bush South of Princeton Avenue @ 34.287293238912, -118.861726373434 $1,260 Sidewalks , Hazards & Gratings : Sidewalk Width at Obstruction Progress NoneProgress Projected DateActual Date Actual Cost NonePriority Comments No Comments $0.00 Sidewalks - Exterior : Sidewalks , Hazards & Gratings NoneResolution Contractor NoneAssignment 0New Value Designated Staff Nogales Avenue - Princeton Avenue to Avenida Colonia Page 16 of 31 92 Finding On-Site Finding 5.00 percent for 302.00 feet Recommendation Up to 2.08 percentRecommendation Costing Info (Estimated) Code Reference Record Number 140022 Sidewalk cross slope is not compliant. Repave the sidewalk surface with the recommended cross slope. ADA 206, 302,CA 11B-403.3 Repave surface East Side Sidewalk South of Princeton Avenue @ 34.287445041861, -118.861707597971 $1,092 Sidewalks , Surface : Cross Slope Progress NoneProgress Projected DateActual Date Actual Cost NonePriority Comments No Comments $0.00 Sidewalks - Exterior : Sidewalks , Surface NoneResolution Contractor NoneAssignment 0New Value Designated Staff Nogales Avenue - Princeton Avenue to Avenida Colonia Page 17 of 31 93 Finding On-Site Finding Not Compliant Recommendation See RecommendationRecommendation Costing Info (Estimated) Code Reference Record Number 140023 Ground surface has an opening that is not compliant. Make sure that the surface opening does not allow passage of a sphere more than ½ inch in diameter. ADA 302 East Side Sidewalk South of Princeton Avenue @ 34.287445041861, -118.861707597971 Unassigned Sidewalks : Opening Progress NoneProgress Projected DateActual Date Actual Cost NonePriority Comments No Comments $0.00 Sidewalks - Exterior : Sidewalks NoneResolution Contractor NoneAssignment 0New Value Designated Staff Nogales Avenue - Princeton Avenue to Avenida Colonia Page 18 of 31 94 Finding On-Site Finding 56.00 inches Recommendation At least 80.00 inchesRecommendation Costing Info (Estimated) Code Reference Record Number 140027 Overhead obstruction height is not compliant. Provide a compliant vertical clearance height. ADA 206, 307.4,CA 11B-307.4 East Side Tree South of Princeton Avenue @ 34.287124814881, -118.861731737852 Unassigned Sidewalks , Hazards & Gratings : Overhead Obstruction Height Progress NoneProgress Projected DateActual Date Actual Cost NonePriority Comments No Comments $0.00 Sidewalks - Exterior : Sidewalks , Hazards & Gratings NoneResolution Contractor NoneAssignment 0New Value Designated Staff Nogales Avenue - Princeton Avenue to Avenida Colonia Page 19 of 31 95 Finding On-Site Finding 52.00 inches Recommendation At least 80.00 inchesRecommendation Costing Info (Estimated) Code Reference Record Number 140026 Overhead obstruction height is not compliant. Provide a compliant vertical clearance height. ADA 206, 307.4,CA 11B-307.4 East Side Tree South of Princeton Avenue @ 34.287193514197, -118.861721009016 Unassigned Sidewalks , Hazards & Gratings : Overhead Obstruction Height Progress NoneProgress Projected DateActual Date Actual Cost NonePriority Comments No Comments $0.00 Sidewalks - Exterior : Sidewalks , Hazards & Gratings NoneResolution Contractor NoneAssignment 0New Value Designated Staff Nogales Avenue - Princeton Avenue to Avenida Colonia Page 20 of 31 96 Finding On-Site Finding Not Found Recommendation See RecommendationRecommendation Costing Info (Estimated) Code Reference Record Number 140021 There is no 60X60 turn area at every 200 feet. Provide a 60X60 turn every 200 feet on the sidewalk. ADA 206, 302 East Side @ 34.287445041861, -118.861707597971 $2,400 Sidewalks : 60X60 Turn Area Progress NoneProgress Projected DateActual Date Actual Cost NonePriority Comments No Comments $0.00 Sidewalks - Exterior : Sidewalks NoneResolution Contractor NoneAssignment 0New Value Designated Staff Nogales Avenue - Princeton Avenue to Avenida Colonia Page 21 of 31 97 Finding On-Site Finding 0.50 inches Recommendation Up to 0.25 inchesRecommendation Costing Info (Estimated) Code Reference Record Number 140008 There is a change in elevation greater than recommended value. Ensure that the change in elevation is within the recommended value. ADA 206, 302 Remove tripping hazards West Side Change in Level North of Avenida Colonia @ 34.286732562869, -118.861865848303 $198 Sidewalks , Change in Level : Change in Level Non Beveled Progress NoneProgress Projected DateActual Date Actual Cost NonePriority Comments No Comments $0.00 Sidewalks - Exterior : Sidewalks , Change in Level NoneResolution Contractor NoneAssignment 0New Value Designated Staff Nogales Avenue - Princeton Avenue to Avenida Colonia Page 22 of 31 98 Finding On-Site Finding Not Found Recommendation See RecommendationRecommendation Costing Info (Estimated) Code Reference Record Number 140012 There are no detectable warnings where the pedestrian route crosses vehicular traffic. Provide detectable warnings. ADA 705,CA 11B-705.1.2.5,CA 11B-247.1.2.5 Install compliant detectable warnings West Side Driveway North of Avenida Colonia @ 34.286946418006, -118.861877918243 $190 Sidewalks , Vehicular Traffic : Crosswalks and Detectable Warnings Progress NoneProgress Projected DateActual Date Actual Cost NonePriority Comments No Comments $0.00 Sidewalks - Exterior : Sidewalks , Vehicular Traffic NoneResolution Contractor NoneAssignment 0New Value Designated Staff Nogales Avenue - Princeton Avenue to Avenida Colonia Page 23 of 31 99 Finding On-Site Finding 8.60 percent Recommendation Up to 5.00 percentRecommendation Costing Info (Estimated) Code Reference Record Number 140013 Slope at vehicular traffic is not compliant. Repave the surface to provide a compliant slope. Repave surface West Side Driveway North of Avenida Colonia @ 34.286946418006, -118.861877918243 $1,092 Sidewalks : Vehicular Traffic Slope Progress NoneProgress Projected DateActual Date Actual Cost NonePriority Comments No Comments $0.00 Sidewalks - Exterior : Sidewalks NoneResolution Contractor NoneAssignment 0New Value Designated Staff Nogales Avenue - Princeton Avenue to Avenida Colonia Page 24 of 31 100 Finding On-Site Finding 5.40 percent Recommendation Up to 2.08 percentRecommendation Costing Info (Estimated) Code Reference Record Number 140014 Cross slope at vehicular traffic is not compliant. Repave the surface to provide a compliant cross slope. ADA 206, 302,CA 11B-403.3 Repave surface West Side Driveway North of Avenida Colonia @ 34.286946418006, -118.861877918243 $1,092 Sidewalks : Vehicular Traffic Cross Slope Progress NoneProgress Projected DateActual Date Actual Cost NonePriority Comments No Comments $0.00 Sidewalks - Exterior : Sidewalks NoneResolution Contractor NoneAssignment 0New Value Designated Staff Nogales Avenue - Princeton Avenue to Avenida Colonia Page 25 of 31 101 Finding On-Site Finding 40.00 inches Recommendation At least 48.00 inchesRecommendation Costing Info (Estimated) Code Reference Record Number 140007 Sidewalk width at the obstruction is not compliant. Sidewalk width at the obstruction shall have the recommended value. ADA 206, 302, 403.5.1,CA 11B-403.5 West Side Guy Wire North of Avenida Colonia @ 34.287374126649, -118.861855119467 $1,260 Sidewalks , Hazards & Gratings : Sidewalk Width at Obstruction Progress NoneProgress Projected DateActual Date Actual Cost NonePriority Comments No Comments $0.00 Sidewalks - Exterior : Sidewalks , Hazards & Gratings NoneResolution Contractor NoneAssignment 0New Value Designated Staff Nogales Avenue - Princeton Avenue to Avenida Colonia Page 26 of 31 102 Finding On-Site Finding 65.00 inches Recommendation At least 80.00 inchesRecommendation Costing Info (Estimated) Code Reference Record Number 140011 Overhead obstruction height is not compliant. Provide a compliant vertical clearance height. ADA 206, 307.4,CA 11B-307.4 West Side Guy Wire North of Avenida Colonia @ 34.287374126649, -118.861855119467 Unassigned Sidewalks , Hazards & Gratings : Overhead Obstruction Height Progress NoneProgress Projected DateActual Date Actual Cost NonePriority Comments No Comments $0.00 Sidewalks - Exterior : Sidewalks , Hazards & Gratings NoneResolution Contractor NoneAssignment 0New Value Designated Staff Nogales Avenue - Princeton Avenue to Avenida Colonia Page 27 of 31 103 Finding On-Site Finding 46.00 inches Recommendation At least 48.00 inchesRecommendation Costing Info (Estimated) Code Reference Record Number 140009 Sidewalk width at the obstruction is not compliant. Sidewalk width at the obstruction shall have the recommended value. ADA 206, 302, 403.5.1,CA 11B-403.5 West Side Sign North of Avenida Colonia @ 34.287412908413, -118.861851096153 $1,260 Sidewalks , Hazards & Gratings : Sidewalk Width at Obstruction Progress NoneProgress Projected DateActual Date Actual Cost NonePriority Comments No Comments $0.00 Sidewalks - Exterior : Sidewalks , Hazards & Gratings NoneResolution Contractor NoneAssignment 0New Value Designated Staff Nogales Avenue - Princeton Avenue to Avenida Colonia Page 28 of 31 104 Finding On-Site Finding 39.00 inches Recommendation At least 48.00 inchesRecommendation Costing Info (Estimated) Code Reference Record Number 140010 Sidewalk width at the obstruction is not compliant. Sidewalk width at the obstruction shall have the recommended value. ADA 206, 302, 403.5.1,CA 11B-403.5 West Side Utility Pole North of Avenida Colonia $1,260 Sidewalks , Hazards & Gratings : Sidewalk Width at Obstruction Progress NoneProgress Projected DateActual Date Actual Cost NonePriority Comments No Comments $0.00 Sidewalks - Exterior : Sidewalks , Hazards & Gratings NoneResolution Contractor NoneAssignment 0New Value Designated Staff Nogales Avenue - Princeton Avenue to Avenida Colonia Page 29 of 31 105 Finding On-Site Finding Not Found Recommendation See RecommendationRecommendation Costing Info (Estimated) Code Reference Record Number 140006 There is no 60X60 turn area at every 200 feet. Provide a 60X60 turn every 200 feet on the sidewalk. ADA 206, 302 West Side @ 34.286719266158, -118.861865848303 $2,400 Sidewalks : 60X60 Turn Area Progress NoneProgress Projected DateActual Date Actual Cost NonePriority Comments No Comments $0.00 Sidewalks - Exterior : Sidewalks NoneResolution Contractor NoneAssignment 0New Value Designated Staff Nogales Avenue - Princeton Avenue to Avenida Colonia Page 30 of 31 106 Prepared By *Estimated Facility Total: *Estimated facility total is for estimating purposes only and does not represent total construction, repair totals or design fees. Prepared Using $25,270 Nogales Avenue - Princeton Avenue to Avenida Colonia Princeton Avenue to Avenida Colonia Moorpark, CA 93021 Date of Inspection 1/25/2018 Disability Access Consultants Nogales Avenue - Princeton Avenue to Avenida Colonia Page 31 of 31 107 Accessibility Survey Prepared By Virginia Colony Place - Condor Drive to End Condor Drive to End Moorpark, CA 93020 Date of Inspection 2/20/2018 Disability Access Consultants City of Moorpark 108 Finding On-Site Finding Not Found Recommendation See RecommendationRecommendation Costing Info (Estimated) Code Reference Record Number 178418 No sidewalk exists at the location. No action necessary until a sidewalk is provided. ADA 206 East Side @ 34.287832858369, -118.857932388783 Unassigned Sidewalks : No Sidewalk Progress NoneProgress Projected DateActual Date Actual Cost NonePriority Comments No Comments $0.00 Sidewalks - Exterior : Sidewalks NoneResolution Contractor NoneAssignment 0New Value Designated Staff Virginia Colony Place - Condor Drive to End Page 2 of 4 109 Finding On-Site Finding Not Found Recommendation See RecommendationRecommendation Costing Info (Estimated) Code Reference Record Number 178417 No sidewalk exists at the location. No action necessary until a sidewalk is provided. ADA 206 West Side @ 34.287832858369, -118.857932388783 Unassigned Sidewalks : No Sidewalk Progress NoneProgress Projected DateActual Date Actual Cost NonePriority Comments No Comments $0.00 Sidewalks - Exterior : Sidewalks NoneResolution Contractor NoneAssignment 0New Value Designated Staff Virginia Colony Place - Condor Drive to End Page 3 of 4 110 Prepared By *Estimated Facility Total: *Estimated facility total is for estimating purposes only and does not represent total construction, repair totals or design fees. Prepared Using $0 Virginia Colony Place - Condor Drive to End Condor Drive to End Moorpark, CA 93020 Date of Inspection 2/20/2018 Disability Access Consultants Virginia Colony Place - Condor Drive to End Page 4 of 4 111 TO: FROM: DATE: CITY OF MOORPARK OFFICE OF THE CITY MANAGER INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM Honorable City Council Steven Kueny, City Manage~~:~ January 30, 2018 SUBJECT: Potential Use of Remaining Bond Proceeds From Former Redevelopment Agency Issued Bonds BACKGROUND In November 2014 and 2016 the Successor Agency (Successor Agency) to the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Moorpark (former Agency) issued Tax Allocation Refunding Bonds. These Bonds were issued to achieve interest cost savings by refunding bonds issued by the former Agency in 1999, 2001 and 2006. (As a side note, these two refundings save about $400,000 annually in debt service costs. These additional property taxes that would have gone to the former Agency are now distributed by the County Auditor-Controller to all of the taxing entities. The City's General Fund receives about $40,000 annually.) The former Agency and Successor Agency have expended the Bond funds to further the purposes of the former Agency. There is about $2 million of cash available plus another approximate $1.5 -$2 million available in the future when certain real property is sold. The City and Redevelopment Agency have collectively spent several millions on infrastructure improvements in the High Street area. Excluding street sweeping (which will be provided at no cost upon effective date of new Refuse Franchise Agreement) the City spends about $42,000 annually on High Street. 1. $8,000 Pepper Trees Maintenance 2. $22,000 Train Station Maintenance 3. $6,000 Street lighting and traffic signal maintenance 4. $6,000 Maintenance of sidewalks, landscaping, parking lots and trash cans Attached are three documents that provide information about the improvements made in the downtown area. A. Summary of Redevelopment Agency Accomplishments 1989-2010 B. Downtown Area Improvements (6/16/17) C. Capital Projects done on the vicinity of High Street since incorporation $77$&+0(17 3 112 Page 2 of 3 January 30, 2018 DISCUSSION City staff suggests the remaining funds be used on infrastructure improvements within the now defunct Project Area of the former Agency which includes High Street and the downtown residential neighborhoods. The infrastructure improvements would include street, sidewalk, curb, gutter and local drainage improvements including High Street. City Staff has developed a preliminary cost estimate of $2 million of needed improvements for the residential a_reas with the former Project Area. When the High Street Streetscape concept was approved by the City Council in June 2009 it had estimated cost of over $4.5 million. It was anticipated that all or most of the cost would be funded by the Moorpark Redevelopment Agency. As we now know the State of California eliminated redevelopment agencies and the City is in the process of winding down the various programs and improvement projects. For this reason as well as the pending decision about possible mixed use zoning for the High Street area the High Street Streetscape Plan should be re-evaluated. The possibility of updating street furniture, and street light standards and placement of Banner poles and themed entry statements should be deferred until after the High Street Streetscape Plan is re- evaluated. The concept of angled parking on alternating sides of High street should also be reconsidered at that time. The initial improvements are recommended to include: 1 . Repair and replacement of sidewalks and installation of appropriate tree wells to insure proper care of the pepper trees. 2. Traffic calming devices including bump outs and crosswalk safety lighting at High Street and Walnut Street, Bard Street and Magnolia Avenue 3. Completion of curb, gutter and sidewalk on Bard Street between Charles Street and High Street especially on the east side of the street where it's currently improved with only a driveway apron. Currently Bard Street has approximately 36 feet of street width within 80 feet of ROW. While the street could be converted to angled parking similar to Walnut Street the north half of this block of Bard Street has residential uses and is zoned R-1. In comparison only the northwest corner of Walnut Street and Charles Street is zoned R-1 and that site is a potential candidate for re-zoning in the future to C-OT, mixed use or multi- family. Installing of angled parking is estimated to cost about $350,000 and completing the standard improvement about $50,000. Another item to consider is placement of a trash enclosure on the west side of Bard Street for use by adjacent commercial business. This would allow for elimination of most of the residential carts for solid waste and recycling pickup on High Street. 4. Construction of the north Metrolink parking lot expansion and re-construction of the current parking lot. This project has approximately an $800,000 funding shortfall and use of Bond funds could be used for this project. 113 Page 3 of 3 January 30, 2018 5. Street, curb, gutter, sidewalk (including ADA) and drainage improvements in the downtown residential neighborhoods. As previously stated, staff's preliminary estimate is $2 million. Based on City's overall street improvement needs and minimal funding as much of the remaining Bond funds as possible should be used for this purpose. Attachments: 1. Summary of Redevelopment Agency Accomplishments 1989 -2010 2. Downtown Area Jmprovements 3. Capital Projects done on the vicinity of High Street since incorporation cc: Deborah Traffenstedt, Assistant City Manager Dave Bobardt, Community Development Director Sean Corrigan, City Engineer/Public Works Director Jeremy Laurentowski, Park and Recreation Director Jessica Sandifer, Community Services Manager Ron Ahlers, Finance Director 114 Capital projects done in vicinity of High Street since incorporation 1985 Sidewalk Construction "' $190,000 1989 Spring Road Railroad Crossing Mootpark Avenue Railroad Crossing Curb, Gutter, and S/W "' $101,000 Mootpa rk Avenue "'$200,000 1991 High Street & Spring Road 1992 High Street Storm Drain and Sidewalks ' High St. & Mootpark Avenue West side ofMootpark Avenue from Community Center to High Street Construction of rubberized railroad crossing on Spring Road Construction of rubberized railroad crossing on Mootpark Avenue North side of High Street, east of Magnolia Street Construction of storm drain improvements north of High Street (by Caltrans) Reconstruction of curb, gutter & sidewalk at southeast comer (by Caltrans) Construction of a storm drain from Walnut Street to Magnolia Street and a sidewalk on the north side of the street between Bard Street and Magnolia Street Construction of a traffic signal at this intersection by Caltrans to fulfill Caltrans' portion of a Gty/State Agreement to signalize 'this intersection and Poindexter Avenue/First Street/Moorpark Avenue C:\UseF:, ;\y'.,\;:;pData\~ ·" li\fv1k.:rosof:\Viindov-1s\Ternp0rory Internet F;!es\Content()ut!ook\C136JCFG\Capital projet:ts done in vicfnilyu '<'i;;r;t 12--0; , Ji/.docx ATTACHMENT 4 115 1995 High Street Decorative Street Lights "' $267,000 Metro Link Parking Lot/Driveway 1996 Walnut Street Bard Stn~et Magnolia Street .2000 Asphalt Overlay Spring Road Rehabilitation Los Angeles Avenue Rehabili ta ti on C:\Us':!r.s\s' vicinity of i Installation of underground conduits for electrical, telephone, cable television, street lights and a decorative lighting system, plus the installation of nostalgic decorative street lights on High Street Construction of the south Metro Link parking lot and access driveway (SCRRA) ['"'"CMP] Complete reconstruction of this street, including curb, gutter and sidewalk Complete reconstruction of this street between Charles Street and High Street Construction of an asphalt overlay on this street south of Charles Street The construction of an asphalt overlay and related improvements to . . . High Street .... High Street being just one part. Rehabilitation of Spring Road between New Los Angeles Avenue and High Street. The cost of this project was reimbursed by Caltrans as required by a Highway Relinquishment Agreement. Rehabilitation of Los Angeles Avenue between High Street and Princeton Avenue. The cost of this project was reimbursed by Caltrans as required by a 116 :::: $555,000 2009 High Street Rehabilitation Walnut Canyon Drain Improvement Highway Relinquishment Agreement. Upgrades to the middle portion of this street segment are being deferred until the Los Angeles Avenue East project is constnicted. Widening and extension of High Street west of Moinpark Avenue and construction of Post Office parking lot. Replacement of open channel drain with covered reinforced concrete pipe from the west end of the High Street extension to approximately 350 feet north of High Street Approximately $1,841,000 for both projects 2014 Railroad crossi~g at Spring Road :::: $4,600,000 2016 Mootpark Avenue Left- Tum Lane ;::: $3,000,000 Street widening and at-grade rail crossing · improvements including a center median, four vehicle crossing gates, pedestrian crossing gates, concrete sidewalk, dedicated northbound right tum lane and bike lanes in both directions. SCRRA's sealed corridor work widened Mootpark Avenue between Poindexter Avenue and High Street. The crossing received channelizing median and sidewalks, additional safety devices and gates, and improved signal at High Street. C:\Users\s ''-c'J, opDt1to\Lcca!\iv1lcrosuf:\Vv'indovvs\ T ernporary Internet Fi!0s\Cont0r1L ()ul!ook\C135JCFG\Capita! projects done !n vidnlty of i :3; ,_,et 12--Cr1 ,;·Yll.docx 117 6/16/17 1 DOWNTOWN AREA IMPROVEMENTS Public Facilities 1. Brought Post Office back to High Street 2. Committed to Civic Center location 3. Bought property on south side of High Street (twice) to foster redevelopment 4. Facilitated Fire Station relocation to High Street 5. Police Service Center 6. Ruben Castro Human Services Center 7. Ventura County Medical Facility 8. Veteran’s Memorial 9. High Street Arts Center acquired and facilitated agreement to manage and operate it Housing 1. Facilitated Area Housing Authority Charles Street Project 2. Facilitated Area Housing Authority Everett Street Project 3. Former MRA now City owns several lots to facilitate affordable housing 4. Approved Essex 200 apartments Parks 1. Virginia Colony 2. Walnut Acres 3. Magnolia 4. Poindexter 5. Community Center Public Works 1. Underground Walnut Canyon drain 2. Extended High Street west of Moorpark Avenue 3. Created public parking lots 4. Realigned Second/Flinn Street intersection with Spring Road 5. Poindexter/First Street at Moorpark Avenue traffic signals 6. Traffic signal at Casey Road and Walnut Canyon Road 7. High Street/Moorpark Avenue traffic signal 8. Traffic signal at Charles Street and Spring Road 9. High Street, Moorpark Avenue and Spring Road storm drains 10. Moorpark Avenue sidewalks from Charles to Third Street 11. Sidewalks installed on Walnut Acres neighborhood streets 118 6/16/17 2 12. Reconstructed Charles Street 13. High Street curb, gutter and sidewalk 14. Avenida Colonia/Nogales Street connected and installation of box culvert drain and curb, gutter and sidewalk 15. Constructed block wall at rear of homes on south side of Sherman Aven ue (along Los Angeles) between Spring Road and Millard Avenue including parkway landscaping 16. Upgraded street lighting on High Street with the use of vintage style light poles 17. Constructed wall to separate Bard Street from Metrolink south parking lot 18. Reconstructed First and Bard Street 19. Constructed paved walkway (along Lassen Avenue right of way) between Park Lane and Moorpark Avenue 20. Reconstructed Poindexter, Everett, Magnolia, Bard and Walnut Street 21. Widened street and installed curb, gutter and sidewalk on Poindexter Avenue 22. Widened Moorpark Avenue between railroad and Poindexter Avenue to allow south to west right turn and sidewalk 23. Alleys in Second Street area and Valley Road reconstructed; Second Street, Bonnie View and Wicks Road received pavement overlay 24. Resurfaced Spring Road south of High Street and installed raised median 25. As part of agreement with Pardee Homes constructed wall and landscaping on west side of Spring Road between railroad and Los Angeles Avenue (rear of homes on west side of Harry Street) 26. Various Metrolink improvements 27. Lighted crosswalk on Moorpark Avenue at Second Street 28. Traffic calming devices and undergrounding of utilities on Second Street west of Bard Street as part of Walnut Acres Park construction 29. Updated FEMA Flood Map and removed several properties from flood zone eliminating the need for flood insurance 30. Sealed corridor for Spring Road and Moorpark Avenue rail crossings 31. Improved pavement and drainage in alley between McFadden and Cornett 32. Parkway landscaping on south side of Poindexter Avenue east and west of Sierra Avenue 119 ATTACHMENT 5 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132