HomeMy WebLinkAboutMIN 2020 0602 PC SPCMINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION
Moorpark, California June 2, 2020
A Special Meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Moorpark was held on
June 2, 2020, in the Council Chambers of said City located at 799 Moorpark Avenue,
Moorpark, California.
1. CALL TO ORDER:
Chair Haverstock called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m.
2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE:
Commissioner Landis led the Pledge of Allegiance.
3. ROLL CALL:
Present: Commissioners Aquino, Di Cecco, Hamous, Landis, and
Chair Haverstock.
Staff Present:
Douglas Spondello, Planning Manager; Freddy A. Carrillo,
Associate Planner 11, Jerry Hittleman, Senior Contract
Planner; and Joyce Figueroa, Administrative Assistant II.
4. PROCLAMATIONS AND COMMENDATIONS:
None.
5. PUBLIC COMMENT:
None.
6. REORDERING OF, AND ADDITIONS TO, THE AGENDA:
None.
7 ANNOUNCEMENTS, FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS, AND REPORTS ON
MEETINGS/CONFERENCES ATTENDED BY THE COMMISSION:
Mr. Spondello spoke about the Community Development Virtual Counter online
portal which includes information regarding:
• Planning Permits
• COVID-19 Zoning Clearance for Outdoor Dining
• Building Permits and Inspections
• Business Registrations
Minutes of the Planning Commission
Moorpark, California
Page 2 June 2, 2020
• Reporting a Violation
• Frequently Asked Questions
Mr. Spondello announced the Joint Meeting of the City Council and Planning
Commission will be on July 8, 2020, at 6:30 p.m. to discuss Hitch Ranch.
8. PUBLIC HEARINGS: (next Resolution No. PC -2020-650)
A. Consider a Resolution Recommending to the City Council Approval of
Industrial Planned Development No. 2019-01 and Conditional Use Permit
No. 2020-02 for the Development of a 48,787 Square -Foot, Single -Story
Industrial Building and Associated Site Improvements on an Undeveloped
3.46 -Acre Site at 5850 Condor Drive, and Making a Determination of
Exemption Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act in
Connection Therewith, on the Application of Paul Minoo (4M Investment
Corporation). Staff Recommendation: 1) Open the public hearing, accept
public testimony and close the public hearing; and 2) Adopt Resolution
No. 2020-650 recommending to the City Council conditional approval of
Industrial Planned Development No. 2019-01 and Conditional Use Permit
No. 2020-02.
AT THIS POINT in the meeting Commissioner Di Cecco announced he would recuse
himself from participation in discussion of Item 8.A. due to a potential conflict of interest
and left the dais. The time was 7:04 p.m.
Mr. Carrillo gave the staff report.
A discussion followed among the Commissioners and staff, which focused
on the following: 1) Proposed building height increase; 2) Ingress/Egress
off of Condor Drive; 3) Curb -cut on Condor Drive; 4) Will a mezzanine be
allowed to be built in the future; 5) Why is the building raised up with steps
to the front door; and 6) Southern California Edison's requirements related
to the undergrounding of existing utility lines .
Chair Haverstock opened the public hearing.
David Osborn, JDO Associates, applicant, stated he read all the
conditions of the project and accepts them and expressed concerns about
the project being burdened with the cost of undergrounding the off-site
utility poles. Mr. Osborn responded to comments and discussed the
purpose and design of the raised entries to the front of the building.
Mr. Spondello clarified that Princeton Avenue does feature a paved
median that is raised going down to the intersection with Condor Drive.
Minutes of the Planning Commission
Moorpark, California
Page 3 June 2, 2020
In response to Chair Haverstock, Mr. Spondello stated there were no
additional speaker cards or written for this item.
Chair Haverstock closed the public hearing.
A discussion followed among the Commissioners regarding: 1) Southern
California Edison (SCE) requiring undergrounding of two off-site utility
poles; and 2) Egress on Condor Drive as opposed to Princeton Avenue.
MOTION: Commissioner Landis moved and Commissioner Aquino seconded a
motion to Adopt Resolution No. 2020-650 recommending to the City Council
conditional approval of Industrial Planned Development No. 2019-01 and
Conditional Use Permit No. 2020-02. The motion carried by voice vote 4-0,
Commissioner Di Cecco absent.
The City Council has final authority for this project.
AT THIS POINT in the meeting Commissioner Di Cecco returned to the dais and
the meeting continued with Item 8.B. The time was 7:27 p.m.
B. Consider a Resolution Recommending to the City Council the Adoption of
an Amended and Restated Deed Restriction for a Vacant, 21.80 -acre
Property Located on the West Side of Princeton Avenue, South of
Highway 118, Removing the Requirement for the Preparation of a Specific
Plan and Requiring a General Plan Land Use Amendment and Zone
Change to a Commercial Land Use Prior to Future Development of the
Property, and Making a Determination of Exemption Pursuant to the
California Environmental Quality Act in Connection Therewith, on the
Application of Mark Ross, Agent, Sunbelt Enterprises, LLC. Staff
Recommendation: 1) Open the public hearing, accept public testimony
and close the public hearing: and 2) Adopt Resolution No. 2020-651
recommending to City Council that an amended and restated deed
restriction be recorded removing the requirement to prepare a Specific
Plan and requiring a General Plan Land Use Map Amendment and Zone
Change to a commercial zone district prior to future site development.
Chair Haverstock disclosed his affiliation with Mr. Thomas Cohen, Cohen
Begun & Deck, LLP, Attorney for Sunbelt Enterprises, LLC. Mr. Cohen is
a member of the Board of Directors of the Chamber of Commerce where
Mr. Haverstock is employed. Chair Haverstock described that no conflict
of interest exists and affirmed his ability to evaluate the application fairly
and impartially.
Mr. Hittleman gave the staff report.
Minutes of the Planning Commission
Moorpark, California
Page 4 June 2, 2020
A discussion followed among the Commissioners and staff, which focused
on the following: 1) How do you get to the 9 -acre parcel on top of the site;
2) If the City's Comprehensive General Plan that is currently underway
recommends this site as commercial designation, will the City designate
the site as commercial; 3) If the updated General Plan recommendation to
the City Council recommends designation as a commercial project, will the
City then pay to have the site rezoned commercial or do they wait for the
developer to step in and pay to have it rezoned commercial; and 4)
Requirement for the applicant to apply for a Zone Change within the five-
year limit should the General Plan not get the commercial designation.
Chair Haverstock opened the public hearing.
Thomas Cohen, Cohen Begun & Deck, LLP, attorney representing the
applicant, Sunbelt Enterprises, LLC, provided background information on
the project and stated it is their desire to initiate a general plan
amendment rather than wait for the City to complete the General Plan
Update.
A discussion followed among the Commissioners and Mr. Cohen
regarding whether the applicant has received any inquiries for commercial
use.
Mark Ross, Agent, Sunbelt Enterprises, LLC, stated it is their goal to figure
out the best route to maximize values. With the changes requested they
can go out to a broader market of potential users.
In response to Chair Haverstock, Mr. Spondello stated there were no
additional speaker cards or written for this item.
Chair Haverstock closed the public hearing.
A discussion followed among the Commissioners supporting the project.
MOTION: Commissioner Di Cecco moved and Commissioner Hamous seconded
a motion to Adopt Resolution No. 2020-651 recommending to City Council that
an amended and restated deed restriction be recorded removing the requirement
to prepare a Specific Plan and requiring a General Plan Land Use Map
Amendment and Zone Change to a commercial zone district prior to future site
development. The motion carried by unanimous voice vote.
The City Council has final authority for this project.
9. PRESENTATION/ACTION/DISCUSSION:
None.
Minutes of the Planning Commission
Moorpark, California
Page 5 June 2, 2020
10. CONSENT CALENDAR:
MOTION: Commissioner Aquino moved and Commissioner Di Cecco seconded
a motion to approve the Consent Calendar. The motion carried by unanimous
voice vote.
A. Consider Approval of the Special Meeting Minutes of May 5, 2020. Staff
Recommendation: Approve the minutes.
11. ADJOURNMENT:
MOTION: Commissioner Landis moved and Commissioner Di Cecco seconded a
motion to adjourn. The motion carried by unanimous voice vote. The time was
7:56 p.m.
Mark Decco
Vice Chair
Karen aughn, AICP
Community Development 1 rect'..dr
.6