The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutAGENDA REPORT 2021 0203 CCSA REG ITEM 10ECITY OF MOORPARK,  CALIFORNIA City Council Meeting of February 3, 2021 ACTION Approved Staff Recommendation. BY B.Garza. E. Consider Agreement with PSOMAS for Preparation of Civic Center Program Environmental Impact Report. Staff Recommendation: Approve agreement with PSOMAS, for preparation of Program Environmental Impact Report for the Civic Center Master Plan and authorize the City Manager to sign the Agreement, subject to final language approval of the City Manager, and authorize the City Manager to approve contingency work not to exceed 10% of the amount of the agreement. (Staff: Jessica Sandifer) Item: 10.E. Item: 10.E. MOORPARK CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT TO: Honorable City Council FROM: Jeremy Laurentowski, Parks and Recreation Director BY: Jessica Sandifer, Community Services Manager DATE: 02/03/2021 Regular Meeting SUBJECT: Consider Agreement with PSOMAS for Preparation of Civic Center Program Environmental Impact Report SUMMARY It is recommended that the City Council approve the Agreement with PSOMAS for preparation of Civic Center Program Environmental Impact Report (PEIR). BACKGROUND A new Civic Center, including a new City Library and City Hall, has been among the City’s top 10 priorities for a number of years and land was assembled for this purpose adjacent to the corner of High Street and Moorpark Avenue. The idea is that the Civic Center in this location would ultimately function as a civic “bookend” for the west end of High Street, with the Police Services Center and Ruben Castro Services Center being the bookend to the east. Planning for the Civic Center began in 2005 and initially the project was primarily centered around a new City Hall building. However, in 2007, the City took over operations of the Library from the County of Ventura and construction of a new Library was added to the project. The project went through several variations and ultimately the City Council adopted a conceptual master plan in 2007 that included a 35,000 square foot two story City Hall building and a 25,000 square foot two story Library building. However, it was eventually determined that there was not sufficient funding to undertake the construction of both a City Hall and a Library, and in 2008 the project stalled due to the recession. 406 Honorable City Council 02/03/2021 Regular Meeting Page 2 Under City operation, the Library has become very popular and there is little room in the building to expand programming or provide quiet areas for patrons to read and study. In 2016, the City began to look again at construction of a Library. In 2018, an Architect was hired to begin the design process. However, before the design process was underway, the City Council requested that a new master plan be prepared, that included both a City Hall and Library to ensure that the buildings were sited in the most advantageous locations within the Civic Center site. In September 2020, the City Council adopted the Civic Center Master Plan (Master Plan), which includes the Library at the south end of the site, adjacent to High Street, and the future City Hall sited where the existing Library building is. The building square footages have been reduced to a 22,000 square-foot City Hall and 18,000 square-foot Library. The reduction in the building square footages reflect a better understanding of future City Hall staffing needs, Library space needs and budgetary restrictions. Both buildings are now planned to be single-story. DISCUSSION The next step in the process as the City moves towards design and construction of the New Library is the preparation of a PEIR for the Master Plan. The PEIR will allow the City to study the potential impacts of the Civic Center campus as contemplated by the Master Plan, allowing for phased construction of the Library, City Hall, and ultimately the potential development opportunities within the City owned properties. City Council Resolution No. 2019-3829 allows for waiver of informal or formal bidding requirements for professional services, if the City Manager determines that the recommended company can competently and cost effectively complete the required work scope. Staff is recommending hiring PSOMAS to complete the PEIR without an informal request for qualification process. In 2007, the City had previously begun work on a PEIR for the Civic Center Campus. The consultant at that time was Bonterra Consulting, Inc. (Bonterra). Bonterra completed a draft PEIR before the project was halted due to the variety of reasons described previously. PSOMAS has since purchased Bonterra. Because PSOMAS is successor to Bonterra, the original work that was completed by Bonterra is in PSOMAS’ possession. Additionally, the majority of the staff that worked on the original PEIR are currently employed with PSOMAS and will be directly involved with this project. This allows for a reduced scope of work on the PEIR and a reduced cost to complete it. In addition, PSOMAS is well known in the industry for their environmental impact report preparation and they are well qualified to perform the work. PSOMAS has prepared a scope of work based on the work that has been done to date and updates to the draft PEIR that will be needed due to changes in CEQA law since the original document was drafted. The scope of work will take us through to completion and adoption of the final PEIR. The cost to update, finalize and adopt the draft PEIR is $219,869. 407 Honorable City Council 02/03/2021 Regular Meeting Page 3 FISCAL IMPACT There are funds budgeted in the Civic Center Capital Improvement Project (C0012) to cover the costs for this work. COUNCIL GOAL COMPLIANCE This action is consistent with City Council Strategy 1, Goal 4, Objective 3 (1.4.3): “Develop conceptual design for new City Hall and Library including Civic Center Master Plan.” STAFF RECOMMENDATION Approve agreement with PSOMAS for preparation of Program Environmental Impact Report for the Civic Center Master Plan and authorize the City Manager to sign the Agreement, subject to final language approval of the City Manager, and authorize the City Manager to approve contingency work not to exceed 10% of the amount of the agreement. Attachment 1: Statement of Qualifications Attachment 2: Agreement 408 STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING CONSULTING SERVICES City of Moorpark December 2020 ATTACHMENT 1 409 5 Hutton Centre Drive Suite 300 Santa Ana, CA 92707 Tel 714.751.7373 Fax 714.545.8883 www.Psomas.com November 2020 Ms. Karen Vaughn, AICP Interim Deputy City Manager Community Development and Public Works Departments City of Moorpark 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark, CA 93021 Subject: Statement of Qualifications for Environmental Planning Consulting Services Dear Ms. Vaughn: Psomas is pleased to submit this Statement of Qualifications (SOQ) to the City of Moorpark to provide Environmental Planning Consulting Services for upcoming projects. Psomas is committed to providing client-centered services and high-quality work products. Through our many years of service to agencies throughout California, we have learned that the most important attributes a consultant can off er a client are expertise/experience, responsiveness, ﬂ exibility, and understanding of community concerns. Our primary objective is to focus on assuring integrity, quality and legal defensibility of analysis and processes, culminating in win-win solutions and successful projects. Our entire Psomas Team is excited and proud to work closely with clients and public agencies to eff ectively navigate the environmental compliance process. For over 24 years, Psomas has provided Environmental Planning on-call/ as-needed services for numerous city and county agencies, including community development, public works, and parks/recreational departments in California, which means you will get a team who understands public agency priorities and is familiar with cultural, environmental, and political dynamics in communities. We look forward to partnering and assisting the City of Moorpark on upcoming projects involving California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and/or National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) consulting services, which also includes our wide range of technical support and engineering services. Our clients are the top priority and we look forward to the opportunity to provide the City with professional services that exceed your expectations. Should you have any questions or would like more information about Psomas, please do not hesitate to contact me at (714) 815-8124 or at glenn.lajoie@psomas.com. Sincerely, Glenn Lajoie, AICP Vice President/Senior Project Manager cc: Jessica Sandifer, Community Services Manager Jeremy Laurentowski, Parks and Recreation Director Glenn Lajoie AICP Balancing the Natural and Built Environment 410 Statement of Qualiﬁ cations Table of Contents Section 1: Company Overview 1 Section 2: Professional Services Offered 4 Section 3: Environmental Planning 6 Section 4: Air Quality, GHG Emissions, Energy, Health Risk, Noise, and Vibration 8 Section 5: Biological Resources 9 Section 6: Regulatory Permitting 11 Section 7: Habitat Restoration 12 Section 8: Cultural, Tribal Cultural, and Paleontological Resources 13 Section 9: Geographic Information Systems and Graphic Design 14 Section 10: Additional In-House Expertise 15 Section 11: Methods and Approach 20 Section 12: Representative Experience 25 Section 13: Resumes 39 411 1Statement of Qualiﬁ cations COMPANY OVERVIEW Section 01 Firm Profile Dedicated to balancing the natural and built environment, Psomas is ranked as one of the top consulting engineering firms in the United States by Engineering News Record (ENR) magazine. We serve public and private clients in markets which include site development, transportation, water, and energy, with the following core services off ered: Environmental Services Civil Engineering Land Surveying, Including Three-Dimensional (3D) Laser Scanning Construction Management The cornerstone of our business approach is to focus on our clients’ long-term needs and to provide quality service and guidance to meet those needs. Our key attribute is our multidisciplinary team of experts. Psomas’ professional staff of industry leaders produces cost-eff ective and award-winning projects for our clients through a value-added approach, incorporating innovation, creativity, sustainability, and cutting-edge technical expertise. Sustainable practices are incorporated into all of our services. From designing Institute for Sustainable Infrastructure (ISI) certified projects, such as removing pollutants from urban storm water runoff to site design for Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEEDTM), Psomas is in the forefront of the sustainable design movement. Our Statement of Qualifications for Environmental Services along with technical engineering support services is presented in this submittal. Detailed information for additional Psomas services are available upon request. Psomas is ranked one of the top consulting engineering firms in the United States by ENR magazine 412 2Statement of Qualiﬁ cations Office Locations Founded in 1946, Psomas provides service from off ices in California, Arizona, and Utah. The Environmental Services Group is based primarily in two off ices, as listed below. Santa Ana Off ice 5 Hutton Centre Drive, Suite 300 Santa Ana, California 92707 Phone: 714.751.7373 Pasadena Off ice 225 South Lake Avenue, Suite 1000 Pasadena, California 91101 Phone: 626.351.2000 California Auburn Bakersfield Culver City Los Angeles Pasadena Riverside Roseville Sacramento San Diego Santa Ana Valencia Walnut Creek Arizona Phoenix Tucson Utah Salt Lake City Santa Ana Office Pasadena Off ice 413 3Statement of Qualiﬁ cations Environmental Services Profile The core technical experts of the Psomas Environmental Services teams have successfully provided California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) documentation to public- and private-sector clients. Psomas’ experience in preparing CEQA and NEPA documentation ranges from straightforward categorical exemptions (CEs) to complex Environmental Impact Reports/Environmental Impact Statements (EIRs/EISs) for complex, controversial projects. Our services include the preparation and peer review of documents in the following topical areas: Air Quality Analyses Biological and Aquatic Resources Cultural, Tribal Cultural, and Paleontological Resources Energy Analyses Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions Habitat Restoration/Mitigation Planning Health Risk Assessment Jurisdictional Delineations/Regulatory Permitting Noise and Vibration The team also has its own GIS mapping and spatial analysis staff members who support environmental planning and resource management projects. Environmental Services Group Key technical specialists include the following: Air Quality and GHG Specialists Aquatic/Fisheries Biologists Archaeologists Botanists Certified Arborists Energy Specialists Environmental Planners GIS Specialists Health Risk Specialist Herpetologists Mammalogists Noise and Vibration Specialists Ornithologists Paleontologists Regulatory Specialists Restoration Ecologists Technical Writers/Editors Wildlife Biologists Psomas meets our clients’ needs by providing responsive, strategic consulting and technical analyses. Our consulting services consistently provide clients with timely and technically sound documentation that complies with regulatory and planning agency requirements. We believe in quality assurance with no surprises. We meet our clients’ needs by providing timely and technically sound documentation that complies with regulatory and planning agency requirements. 414 4Statement of Qualiﬁ cations PROFESSIONAL SERVICES OFFERED Section 02 Environmental Planning CEQA and NEPA Compliance Project Management Quality Assurance and Peer Reviews Air Quality, Greenhouse Gas Emissions, and Health Risk Air Quality Analyses for Mobile and Stationary Sources Health Risk Assessments and GHG Emissions Analyses Energy Assessments Stationary Source Permitting, Dust Control Plans, and Pollutant Monitoring Noise and Vibration Noise and Vibration Impact Analyses 3D Noise Modeling Noise and Vibration Monitoring Noise Limit Compliance Biological Resources Vegetation Mapping, Plant and Wildlife Surveys, and Tree Surveys Biological Resources Analysis and Documentation Pre-construction Surveys and Construction Monitoring Regulatory Permitting Jurisdictional Delineations Compensatory Mitigation Strategizing Permit Processing, Coordination, and Regulatory Compliance 415 5Statement of Qualiﬁ cations Habitat Restoration Habitat Restoration and Enhancement Planning and Design Habitat Mitigation and Monitoring Plans Field Monitoring and Documentation Cultural, Tribal Cultural, and Paleontological Resources Records Searches, Surveys, and Assessments Excavations, Salvage, and Data Recovery Assembly Bill 52 and Senate Bill 18 Consultation Assistance Construction Monitoring Geographic Information Systems Database Design Global Positioning System (GPS) Surveys Shade and Shadow Modeling Transportation/Traf ﬁ c Engineering Traff ic Impact and Parking Studies Transit-Oriented Development (TOD) Planning Studies Regional Transportation Studies Water Resources Hydrology and Hydraulics Water Quality and Water Resources Design Water and Wastewater Infrastructure Water Supply Assessments (WSAs) Visual Assessments 416 6Statement of Qualiﬁ cations ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING Section 03 As a leader in the field of environmental planning and analysis, our team has helped clients navigate through the increasingly complex processes required by CEQA and NEPA. Our work begins prior to the preparation of CEQA and NEPA documents. By encouraging involvement early in the project planning process, Psomas provides input to clients that focuses on avoiding and minimizing environmental eff ects and facilitates the environmental and entitlement process. Working as a team, we off er comprehensive problem-solving solutions and reports for both complex and straightforward projects. Our clients save time and money through our extensive experience in preparing environmental and planning documents. Our solid analytical and management approaches result in comprehensive, easily understood, and legally defensible documents. The following professional services are off ered: CEQA Documentation Categorical Exemptions (CEs) Initial Studies (ISs) Negative Declarations (NDs) Mitigated Negative Declarations (MNDs) Sustainable Community Environmental Assessments (SCEAs) Environmental Impact Reports (EIRs) Addenda NEPA Documentation Categorical Exclusions (CEs) Environmental Assessments (EAs) Findings of No Significant Impacts (FONSIs) Environmental Impact Statements (EISs) California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) Documentation Preliminary Environmental Analysis Reports (PEARs) Preliminary Environmental Studies (PESs) Joint Documentation (EIR/EIS; IS/EA) Pursuant to Caltrans Standard Environmental Reference (SER) 417 7Statement of Qualiﬁ cations Additional Documentation Services Constraints Analyses Peer Reviews Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Plans/Programs (MMRPs) Preparation and Construction Compliance Strategic Consultation Project Management Services Psomas also provides a wide range of project management services to supplement our clients’ staff resources. Our senior staff members often assist clients by facilitating and managing public and private projects throughout project’s execution; reviewing the quality of environmental and planning products; off ering entitlement strategies; and assisting in issue resolution. Scoping and Community Meetings/Public Hearings Agency Coordination Project Strategy and Management Public Outreach Programs CEQA Update Presentations CEQA Training 418 8Statement of Qualiﬁ cations AIR QUALITY, GHG EMISSIONS, ENERGY, HEALTH RISK, NOISE, AND VIBRATION Psomas provides air quality, GHG emissions, energy, health risk assessment, and noise and vibration technical analyses/assessments for projects of all sizes and types. Psomas’ goal is to assist our clients in designing projects that minimize air quality, GHG, and noise impacts; meet regulatory and lead agency requirements; and minimize project costs. Psomas staff has worked on high profile and contentious projects throughout California using state-of-the-art air quality and noise computer models. This capability enables our staff to provide legally defensible short-term construction and long-term operational assessments. Psomas also has the equipment and trained staff to perform air quality and noise monitoring to maintain compliance with regulatory agencies. As air quality, GHG emissions, health risk, and noise and vibration impacts are analyzed, we work closely with clients to develop impact-reducing measures that can enhance project value. Air Quality, Greenhouse Gas Emissions, Energy Analysis and Health Risk Services Air Quality Analyses and Technical Reports GHG Emissions Analyses and Technical Reports Air Quality Dispersion Modeling (CALINE, AERMOD) Air Quality Emissions Calculations (CalEEMod, EMFAC, OFFROAD, AP-42) Health Risk Assessments Energy Analysis Dust Control Plans and Air Pollutant Monitoring Peer Review of Technical Analyses Noise and Vibration Services Noise and Vibration Analyses and Technical Reports 3D Noise Modeling (SoundPlan) General Plan Noise Elements Noise Ordinance Assessments Ambient and Construction Noise Monitoring Traff ic, Rail, and Stationary Source Noise and Vibration Modeling Peer Review of Technical Analyses Section 04 Psomas works closely with clients to develop impact- reducing measures that can enhance project value. 419 9Statement of Qualiﬁ cations BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES Psomas Wildlife Biologists and Botanists have the technical background, experience, and necessary permits to conduct a full range of field evaluations, including special status species surveys, and to ensure compliance with resource agency permits. Expertise includes preparing biological constraints analyses, comprehensive Biological Technical Reports, and applicable portions of CEQA and NEPA documents. By working proactively with our clients, biological impacts can be minimized or avoided whenever feasible and mitigation programs can be designed to meet regulatory requirements and project objectives. Our staff includes recognized experts in the fields of terrestrial wildlife biology, aquatic biology, and botany as listed below. Regulatory Compliance Expertise Federal Endangered Species Act (FESA) California Endangered Species Act (CESA) Federal Clean Water Act (CWA) Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA) California Fish and Game Code Special Status Plant Species Fairy Shrimp El Segundo Blue Butterfl y Quino Checkerspot Santa Ana Sucker Unarmored Threespine Stickleback Arroyo Chub Santa Ana Speckled Dace Southern Steelhead Arroyo Toad Western Spadefoot California Red-Legged Frog Southern Mountain Yellow- Legged Frog Western Pond Turtle Desert Tortoise Flat-Tailed Horned Lizard Coachella Valley Fringe-Toed Lizard Blunt-Nosed Leopard Lizard Coastal California Gnatcatcher Southwestern Willow Flycatcher Least Bell’s Vireo Western Yellow-Billed Cuckoo Tricolored Blackbird Burrowing Owl Swainson’s Hawk Spotted Owl Townsend’s Big-Eared Bat Mohave Ground Squirrel San Bernardino Kangaroo Rat Stephens’ Kangaroo Rat Los Angeles Pocket Mouse Pacific Pocket Mouse Section 05 420 10Statement of Qualiﬁ cations Special Status Species Survey Expertise Analysis, Documentation, and Implementation Services Literature Reviews Vegetation Mapping and General Wildlife Surveys Nesting Bird Surveys Acoustic Bat Surveys Camera Monitoring of Burrows Focused Surveys for Special Status Plant and Wildlife Species Biological Opportunities/Constraints Reports and Habitat Assessments Wildlife Corridor Movement Analyses Biological Technical Reports Benthic Macroinvertebrate (BMI) Bioassessments California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) Natural Environment Studies CEQA/NEPA Biological Resources Analyses U.S. Forest Service Biological Assessments, Biological Evaluations, and Management Indictor Species Reports U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Biological Assessments California Department of Fish and Wildlife Consistency Determinations/Take Authorizations Agency Consultation and Process Facilitation Habitat Conservation Plan (HCP)/Natural Community Conservation Plan (NCCP)/Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP) Compliance Construction/Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Peer Review of Technical Analyses 421 11Statement of Qualiﬁ cations REGULATORY PERMITTING Psomas provides regulatory permitting services to assist landowners in obtaining the regulatory permits necessary to implement a project. We have the technical experience and regulatory relationships necessary to guide clients through the permitting processes pursuant to local, State, and federal environmental laws and regulations, over riparian features, special status species, and protected habitats. Our staff has extensive experience in providing the technical information necessary to prepare accurate and complete permit applications for approval by the regulatory agencies. Psomas’ approach to permit processing emphasizes problem solving and practical solutions to meet project goals and to comply with regulations in a timely and cost-eff icient manner. Resource Agency Permit Processing and Coordination U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Section 404 Nationwide and Individual Permits Section 10 Rivers and Harbors Act Permits NEPA Support Regional Water Quality Control Board Section 401 Water Quality Certifications Report of Waste Discharge Permits Construction Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plans California Department of Fish and Wildlife Section 1602 Streambed Alteration Agreements CEQA Support California Coastal Commission Coastal Development Permits Regulatory Documentation Preliminary Jurisdictional Site Assessments Jurisdictional Delineation Reports California Rapid Assessment Method (CRAM) Analyses Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program (SWAMP) Assessments Habitat Mitigation and Monitoring Plans Habitat Restoration Plans Candidate Mitigation Site Evaluations Best Management Practices Section 06 Psomas’ approach to permit processing emphasizes problem solving and practical solutions to meet project goals. 422 12Statement of Qualiﬁ cations HABITAT RESTORATION Psomas provides habitat restoration services that include restoration planning and natural resources management. Our Habitat Restoration staff members have the necessary technical expertise and project experience to provide a variety of planning and management tasks for riparian and upland habitat types. This includes habitat restoration and enhancement design and planning, compensatory mitigation planning, field monitoring and documentation, native plant recommendations, and resources management planning and implementation. Psomas’ restoration ecologists, botanists, wildlife biologists, regulatory specialists, certified arborists, and CRAM practitioners work collaboratively with clients, resource agency staff , project engineers, landscape architects, and contractors to design and implement restoration and enhancement programs. These programs result in successful habitat establishment and compliance with resource agency requirements. Resource Management Planning/ Implementation Expertise Habitat Creation, Restoration, and Enhancement Planning and Design Invasive Plant Species Management Programs Resource Management Plans Compensatory Mitigation Planning and Documentation Resource Agency Coordination and Compliance Conceptual and Construction-Level Restoration/ Enhancement Planning Habitat Installation and Long-Term Performance Monitoring Plant Palette Design (Native, Drought-Tolerant, and Low-Fuel Volume) Educational and Interpretive Programs and Brochures Experience with California Native Habitats Riparian Woodland/ Wetlands Coastal Sage Scrub Coast Live Oak Woodland Walnut Woodland Chaparral Native Grassland Alluvial Scrub Desert Habitat Section 07 423 13Statement of Qualiﬁ cations CULTURAL, TRIBAL CULTURAL, AND PALEONTOLOGICAL RESOURCES Psomas provides cultural resources management services, including archaeology, paleontology, architectural history (e.g., buildings, bridges), ethnography, and tribal consultation. In-house services by qualified staff members include archaeological and paleontological (fossil resources) field surveys/assessments; property assessments; test and data recovery excavations; fossil salvage; and construction monitoring to comply with mitigation requirements. Psomas’ Cultural Resources Management services and products are designed to meet the requirements of CEQA; NEPA; Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA); and the Standard Guidelines for the Assessment and Mitigation of Adverse Impacts to Nonrenewable Paleontologic Resources developed by the Society of Vertebrate Paleontology (SVP). These services are managed by a Registered Professional Archaeologist (RPA) who meets the Secretary of Interior’s standards for historic preservation programs for archaeology. Our staff includes personnel permitted to work on Bureau of Land Management lands in the State of California. Archaeology/Paleontology/Tribal Cultural Services CEQA, NEPA, and NHPA Section 106 Compliance Analyses Local, State, and Federal Agency Consultation and Interagency and Departmental Coordination Constraints and Feasibility Analyses Phase I Records Searches and Survey Reports Phase II Resource Evaluation Studies and Reports Phase III Data Recovery Mitigation Studies and Reports Phase IV Monitoring Mitigation Studies and Reports Paleontological Resources Assessments Caltrans Documentation Archaeological Survey Reports (ASRs) Extended Phase I Reports (XPIs) Historic Property Survey Reports (HPSRs) Historic Resources Compliance Reports (HRCRs) Paleontological Identification Reports (PIRs) Paleontological Evaluation Reports (PERs) Paleontological Mitigation Plans (PMPs) Completion of State Department of Parks and Recreation (DPRs) 523 Resource Record Forms Construction Monitoring and Salvage Native American Scoping and Consultation (AB 52 and SB 18) Peer Review of Technical Analyses Section 08 424 14Statement of Qualiﬁ cations GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS AND GRAPHIC DESIGN The Environmental Group’s GIS/Graphic Design team uses the latest GIS technology for planning, natural resources management, and impact assessments. Services include database design, development, spatial analyses, 3D modeling with shade analysis, and high quality graphics to meet client and project needs. Psomas implements its GIS capabilities through field personnel who are trained and equipped with GPS devices to collect real-time, diff erentially corrected spatial information for project sites. Psomas also maintains a wide array of commercial and public datasets such as color digital aerial imagery, critical habitats, farmland, soils, census, and other planning and natural resource information. Our staff uses the most up-to-date, industry standard software to facilitate information exchange and to ensure compatibility with projects that involve multidisciplinary design and mapping. Mapping and Spatial Analyses Map Production Database Design Data Conversion and Integration GPS Surveys Spatial Analyses Mapping 3D Analyses Shade and Shadow Modeling Impact Assessments Geocoding Graphic Design Services Pamphlets Brochures Public Communications Signs and Banners Presentation Materials Web Graphics Section 09 425 15Statement of Qualiﬁ cations ADDITIONAL IN-HOUSE EXPERTISE Additional services available at Psomas that can support the preparation of documents pursuant to CEQA and NEPA include, but are not limited to, water and wastewater infrastructure; water supply assessment; hydrology/hydraulics; geomorphology and sediment transport; numerical modeling; planning; land surveying (including 3D laser scanning); transportation planning and engineering; subdivision design; master planning for grading, drainage, and fl ood control; civil engineering design including Building Information Modeling (BIM). These in-house capabilities and technical specialties underscore our capacity to provide the full range of services as-needed during project execution. Our multi-discipline team allows us to respond to client requests more eff ectively and eff iciently. Transportation/Traffic/Parking Analysis Engineering Our broad technical expertise in roadway transportation/traff ic engineering, coupled with our commitment to sustainability, results in a team dedicated to developing innovative solutions to fit our clients’ project needs. Psomas provides services in transportation modeling, planning, traff ic calming, and design. Our roster of transportation engineering projects includes street improvement, safety studies, signalization, construction sequencing, traff ic calming, and circulation. Our engineers and planners also provide assessments, studies, and financial analyses for master-planned communities. The transportation/engineering and planning services we provide to support development projects include: Traff ic Impact and Parking Studies Transit-Oriented Development (TOD) Planning Studies Regional Transportation Studies Street Improvement Design and Engineering Signal Warrants and Timing Studies Road Safety Analysis Various Tra ff ic Engineering Design Site Development Engineering We deliver a broad spectrum of civil engineering and site development services to public, private, and institutional clients. Our site development resume includes education, healthcare, civic/municipal, and federal projects, as well as off ice, retail, industrial, residential, and recreation projects. At the forefront of technology, Psomas’ experts in 3D design apply Building Information Modeling (BIM) to civil site plans to create highly accurate virtual 3D site models, providing valuable information to enhance design solutions. Section 10 Psomas’ in-house capabilities underscore our capacity to provide the full range of services as-needed during project execution. 426 16Statement of Qualiﬁ cations Land Planning and Urban Design Land Use Entitlements Subdivision Design Sustainable Site Design 3D (BIM) Site Design and Modeling Utilities Planning and Design Grading, Drainage and Flood Control Street and Highway Design Water/Wastewater Engineering Psomas experts have decades of experience providing expert services for potable water, recycled water, wastewater, and storm water projects. These services include, but are not limited to, feasibility studies; alternatives analyses; and master plans for water, sewer, and recycled water facilities. Studies range from single-parcel sewer studies and fire fl ow analyses to large-scale planned community infrastructure master plans using computerized modeling techniques. Our expertise includes managing urban runoff quality and quantity. Psomas provides functional and restorative design solutions that respect storm water as a resource. Water Supply Assessments (WSA) and Verifications Water, Sewer, and Recycled Water Infrastructure Plans and Studies Surface Water Studies Water Quality Monitoring Plans Water Quality Assessment Reports/Low Impact Development (LID) Reports National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Permitting Impact Analyses Construction Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plans (SWPPPs) Best Management Practices (BMPs) Water Quality Management Plans (WQMPs) Alternative Water Supply Analyses Water and Sewer Systems Design Bridge Design Retaining and Sound Wall Design Psomas experts have decades of experience providing expert services for potable water, recycled water, wastewater, and storm water projects. 427 17Statement of Qualiﬁ cations Survey Dramatic advances in technology have transformed the surveying profession. Diversifying beyond the standard survey services, Psomas is at the forefront of technological advances. Our 3D laser scanning capabilities include state-of-the-art stationary and mobile scanners that quickly produce highly-accurate, data-rich files collected in a safe environment. Our services range from providing a 3D point cloud all the way to providing full modeling services. The deliverable can be in AutoCAD, MicroStation, Civil3D or Revit. Right-of-Way Engineering Control surveys Land net surveys Records-of-survey Right-of-way mapping Appraisal maps Utility detection and mapping Utility coordination Legal descriptions and plats Acquisition documents GIS Services Custom Internet/intranet web applications Needs assessments Land use analysis GIS utility mapping Data management Database development Geodetic database management Remote sensing GPS/Geodetic Surveys Geodetic control surveys GPS surveys GPS/RK surveys Airborne GPS Airfield surveys Design Surveys Engineering design surveys Architectural design surveys ALTA surveys Utility mapping Topographic and subdivision mapping 428 18Statement of Qualiﬁ cations Photogrammetry Digital orthophotography LiDAR-based mapping Aerial photography Topographic mapping 3D imaging/modeling Small Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (sUAV) Aerial control Forensic Mapping Subsurface Utility Detection and Mapping Subsurface utility detection and mapping is a branch of Psomas’ survey practice that involves managing certain risks associated with utility mapping at appropriate ASCE 38-02 quality levels, utility coordination, utility relocation design and coordination, utility condition assessment, communication of utility data to concerned parties, utility relocation cost estimates, implementation of utility accommodation policies, and utility design. Subsurface utility detection and mapping utilizes professionals with the education, training and knowledge of underground utility systems and civil and survey technologies required to verify and reconcile the diff erent methods of utility detection. Horizontal and vertical detection for most underground utilities Use of standard utility detection equipment: a standard electromagnetic utility locator, a ground penetrating radar unit, sonic wave generator and magnetic locator NULCA certified personnel for utility detection CCTV inspection capabilities NASSCO-certified personnel for CCTV inspection Incorporate ASCE Standard 38-02 Quality Levels into mapping 429 19Statement of Qualiﬁ cations Program/Construction Management For the past 25 years, Psomas has provided “third party” or “agency” program, project, and construction management and inspection services. We can serve as your advocates, as well as commit to acting responsibly with public funds. Through lessons learned, innovation, and the use of web-based technology, the Psomas Team can deliver a successful project. Program Management Partnering/team building training Design oversight Master scheduling/estimating Plan review Value engineering Construction strategy development Bidding and award services Staff augmentation Construction Management Training Biddability/constructability review Scheduling Cost control Resident engineering, structures rep., and construction management Inspection Contract administration Community relations Labor compliance Project close-out/warranty Claims avoidance and resolution Through lessons learned, innovation, and the use of web- based technology, the Psomas Team can deliver a successful project. 430 20Statement of Qualiﬁ cations METHODS AND APPROACH Methods and Approach Overview Regardless of the type and size of a project, Psomas believes in a holistic approach toward project management and client satisfaction, in addition to meeting the requirements of the technical scope of services. One of the components of this approach is developing and maintaining a collaborative client relationship. Psomas is committed to fostering trust-based client relationships that will last well beyond any single project. Building upon the notion of this relationship is establishing a line of communication that facilitates data sharing, project information updates, and schedule and cost maintenance. We will rely on the expertise and knowledge of City staff as much as they will rely on our capabilities in managing the environmental documentation process. In light of this approach, Psomas envisions a synergistic working relationship with the City that would enable the process to progress eff iciently, while facilitating exchange of ideas; knowledge gathering; transfer of information; and partnering on the common objective of completing successful environmental documents, on time, and within budget. Additionally, and more specifically, we embrace the following steps in our process:  Establish a communication protocol with the City staff , and technical leads including subconsultants and other key team members to ensure project- critical information is eff iciently and accurately conveyed across the team; Ensure roles/responsibilities are clear for eff icient management of assignments and quality control of services and deliverables; Utilize experienced staff with extensive relevant experience who will do the job right the first time; Agree on initial project schedule and budget with City staff and a protocol for updating status on both during all project phases; Determine key project description details with the City/Applicant early to facilitate accurate and consistent peer reviews and EIR analyses; Verify that technical approach/scope of services as conveyed in the proposal still meets City and Applicant expectations following completion of project description; and Collaborate up front with the City on standard templates for project deliverables, including peer review technical memorandums and CEQA document components. Implementation Plans Important to the successful delivery of a project is implementing our scope of work, schedule and cost controls in compliance with the requirements of, and to Section 11 431 21Statement of Qualiﬁ cations the satisfaction of, the City. Completing projects successfully will strengthen the City’s trust in Psomas. Therefore, the longevity of our relationship will depend on successful implementation of the scope of work on schedule and within budget. In order to avoid potential issues, the Project Manager will be responsible for closely monitoring the status of these three key components of projects: Project Controls – Scope of Work The scope of work for most projects will infl uence the budget and schedule. Upon project kick-off , the scope of work is discussed further with the City and project team. As the scope of work will direct the action items for all tasks proposed, it is imperative it is kept updated and any changes in approach and direction are refl ected in the scope of work. The scope of work will be confirmed with the City at regular intervals to facilitate solutions to potential issues, as applicable, before they become impediments to completing the project. Project Controls – Schedule An agreed-upon master schedule will be used to monitor progress on key milestones and deliverables. The schedule will be updated, as needed, and distributed to the project team. As the project status is maintained and updated in the master schedule, an appropriate corrective plan of action will be developed, in collaboration with City staff to address variances, with the goal of getting the tasks/projects back on schedule. Additionally, in order to ensure the project schedule is maintained, we have established workload management systems, monitoring techniques, and internal staff ing arrangements to assist in meeting project requirements and schedule. Psomas also uses Microsoft Project, as appropriate, to track how key milestones and deliverables relate. The mechanisms in place and the diligence of our Project Manager will ensure the project stays on schedule. Project Controls – Budget The budget is another key component that will be closely monitored and controlled by the Project Manager. Assigned hours and costs for each task will be communicated with the Psomas Team to ensure hours allocated for those tasks are aligned with performance. Psomas uses a comprehensive system (Deltek Vision) for tracking and reporting employee time and project costs. The Project Manager has real-time information regarding total authorized budget, costs expended to date, current expenditures, and the remaining balance. Access to accurate, complete data will allow our Project Manager to alert the City to potential budget implications if issues arise. Soliciting and Documenting Stakeholders’ Input Public participation during the CEQA or NEPA process will provide the stakeholder (i.e., agencies, members of the public, and the development community) input that is necessary in addressing issues of concern. An environmental review document that considers, addresses and analyzes environmental issues of concern up front can have a higher level of support from the community during the public hearing process and ultimate approval/certification. 432 22Statement of Qualiﬁ cations The opportunities for soliciting input and comment during the environmental process under CEQA include the scoping meeting for an EIR, public review periods for an EIR as well as MNDs, study sessions prior to the hearings, and public hearings where decision makers consider projects. Psomas is well experienced in conducting and facilitating scoping and other public meetings to inform community stakeholders about a project’s definition, purpose, and the required CEQA process. Prior to public meetings, as applicable, Psomas will prepare agendas, handouts, sign-in sheets, and an informative slide presentation. Following public meetings, Psomas will compile the comments and identify the issues of concern to be addressed in the environmental document. Innovative Approaches and Other Management or Implementation Strategies Best Practices The environmental documentation needs of every project are unique and depend on the type and size of the project, existing conditions, potential impacts, and public controversy, among other factors. However, regardless of the type and size of projects, best practices espoused by our project team will facilitate the environmental process on future projects and help address administrative, technical, and field related issues. Technical Solutions One of the strengths of the Psomas Team is taking the time in the beginning of the project to develop a thorough project description that correctly refl ects details of both project construction and operation. Upon completion and approval by the City and/or applicant, the project description will be shared with the Psomas technical leads for conducting the analysis contained in their respective sections of the environmental document. Based on our experience with other projects, a solid project description can serve to avoid later revisions to the environmental document analyses, as well as potential delays in the schedule. Additionally, the Project Manager will closely monitor the content of technical studies/ analyses to keep the client apprised of the progress and any issues that may arise. If potential constraints and impacts are identified, Psomas will alert the City prior to completion of the reports/analyses to discuss the issues of concern and potential solutions to avoid impacts and required mitigation, whenever feasible. Furthermore, in addition to managing the project and the environmental document, a key role of the Project Manager and Principal-in-Charge will be to provide ongoing guidance and strategic consultation to the City regarding new regulations aff ecting proposed projects. Psomas understands the regulations and works to find solutions that fit our clients’ needs on each project. Problem-solving and creative discussions help to streamline the process for the environmental documents. In addition, as discussed previously, Psomas will off er to work with the City at the onset to provide input at the design level and strategize on incorporating features in the project to avoid potential impacts. In-House Quality Assurance/Quality Control (QA/QC) Psomas is committed to providing high quality technical documents that engender client satisfaction, meet the needs of the project, and withstand legal scrutiny. Therefore, conducting in-house QA/QC reviews concurrent with the preparation of written technical documents is a critical part of our delivery of technically sound and legally defensible environmental documents. In fact, Psomas has a company-wide quality assurance/quality control committee that is called “Pride in Performance” with the goal of maintaining 433 23Statement of Qualiﬁ cations the culture of “quality” throughout the firm. Alia Hokuki, Senior Advisor and QA/QC Lead for this contract, is the Environmental Planning group’s representative to the committee. Our approach to achieving the envisioned level of quality includes the following steps: First, our QA/QC process begins with the assignment of staff members who have the appropriate technical expertise and experience to complete the work. Second, all work products are prepared with the oversight and review of an assigned technical lead. Third, upon completion of the first internal draft of a technical document or report, it is reviewed by the Project Manager for consistency with the project description, compliance with our approved scope of work, and technical accuracy. Once the document has been revised to the satisfaction of the Project Manager, it is sent to our in-house technical editor for review of grammar, proper nomenclature, references, and methodological consistency. The last step before the document is submitted to the City is a thorough and complete word processing review that produces a correctly formatted document, with accurate references to tables, exhibits, appendices, and the table of contents. Only then is the document submitted to the City for review. Health and Safety Safety is a key goal for Psomas. Our in-house Safety Committee has set up procedures and training for our field and in-house staff to approach each project with proactive safety practices. Psomas prepares for projects by anticipating field conditions and performing site visits to inform all staff of the existing conditions. We provide our clients with staff who are technically trained and knowledgeable of the site constraints for the job at hand. By doing so, we can anticipate potentially confl icting physical conditions and assess site specific issues that need to be addressed to ensure the safety of our team during site visit and field work, as applicable, during the environmental process. Overview of On-Call Work Programs The following briefl y outlines our approach to the services to be provided: Preparing Environmental Documents (including categorical exemptions, environmental assessments, negative declarations and EIRs): Psomas recognizes that future City projects, depending on their type, size, and issues of concern, may require several diff erent types of CEQA and NEPA processes. For NEPA, the evaluation and associated environmental assessment will be prepared in accordance with the format and content specified by the NEPA lead agency. The work program for a possible (mitigated) negative declaration or EIR would be initiated following the completion and confirmation of the Project Description. Psomas will then proceed with preparation of the Initial Study, pursuant to Appendix G of the CEQA Guidelines. The Initial Study review will include screening and threshold review for each topical area in order to confirm and proceed with the appropriate CEQA clearance review. Should the Initial Study conclude the need to prepare an EIR, the Draft EIR will include the Introduction and Purpose, Executive Summary and Project Description. The Environmental Analysis section will evaluate the necessary information with respect to the existing conditions, the potential adverse eff ects of project construction and implementation (both individual Qualified Staff Project Work Plan Assignments of Tasks Adherence to Standards Tracking and Documentation Monitoring/ReviewTraining Orientation434 24Statement of Qualiﬁ cations and cumulative), and measures to mitigate such eff ects. Feasible mitigation measures will be recommended to reduce significance of impacts and identify areas of unavoidable significant adverse impacts, even after mitigation. Environmental issues raised during the scoping process (Notice of Preparation responses; public scoping meeting, and any other relevant and valid information sources) will also be evaluated. Psomas will complete the environmental review process, respond to all comments received during the Draft EIR public review period, prepare the mitigation monitoring program, and draft the necessary Findings and possible Statement of Overriding Considerations pursuant to Sections 15091 and 15093 of the CEQA Guidelines. The Psomas Team will be viewed as an integral component in the project review for (mitigated) negative declarations and EIRs and will participate in meetings with staff and at public hearings. The Psomas Team will have the responsibility of assisting the City during the public meetings and throughout the hearing process leading to the determination/certification of the CEQA clearance. Peer Reviewing Environmental Documents: If Psomas is tasked with conducting the peer review of an environmental document, Psomas’ Project Manager and technical experts will conduct a thorough and detailed review of the document and technical analyses for compliance with CEQA Guidelines or NEPA guidance and technical adequacy. Upon completion of the review, Psomas will prepare a memorandum summarizing the review and providing comments. If the CEQA/NEPA document contains inaccuracies, recommendations will be provided. The memorandum will be submitted to the City to be shared with an applicant. Preparing Technical Studies (i.e., air quality, GHG emissions, noise, transportation/traff ic, in addition to other studies, as deemed appropriate): Psomas will prepare the said technical studies, as required, which may also be incorporated into an environmental review document. In addition to the identified studies, Psomas provides a full suite of technical capabilities to complete an environmental review process with our in-house staff for most assignments. However, there are certain technical disciplines such as geology and soils, hazards materials, and historic resources that are not provided in-house. For those technical specialties, Psomas will engage our subconsultant team members who have worked extensively with Psomas on projects or who have extensive local knowledge that could benefit the environmental analysis. Our existing relationships with our subconsultant team members ensure successful teamwork, coordination, and completion of the technical tasks. Upon completion of the technical studies, draft and final reports will be provided to the City for review and approval. The approved studies can be incorporated into the environmental document and included as appendices. Peer Reviewing Technical Studies: If technical studies are prepared by the applicant’s consultants and provided to the City for use in an environmental document, Psomas’ technical experts and Project Manager will conduct a peer review of these studies for technical adequacy and compliance with CEQA requirements. Psomas will prepare a memorandum summarizing the peer review. If a study contains inaccuracies, recommendations will be provided. The memorandum will be provided to the City to be shared with an applicant. 435 25Statement of Qualiﬁ cations REPRESENTATIVE EXPERIENCE Psomas serves public- and private-sector clients in the site development, transportation, water, and energy markets. Our environmental planning and resource management clients include the following: Cities and counties throughout the southwestern United States; Numerous local and regional agencies and joint power authorities, including water/wastewater, solid waste, transportation, and various public utilities; Higher education campuses; and Private sector clients, including, but not limited to, land development, industry, institutional, health care, energy, and aerospace. Descriptions of some of our representative project experience and resumes of some of our qualified staff are provided on the following pages. Section 12 436 26Statement of Qualiﬁ cations South Pasadena General Plan/ Downtown Specific Plan Update EIR South Pasadena, CA/City of South Pasadena Psomas is preparing a Program Environmental Impact Report (PEIR) for this project, which involves a comprehensive update to both the 1998 South Pasadena General Plan and the 1996 Mission Street Specific Plan (MSSP). The City of South Pasadena (City) occupies approximately 3.5 square miles on the western edge of the San Gabriel Valley area of Los Angeles County. The proposed General Plan Update will serve as a long-term policy guide for decision-making regarding the appropriate physical development, resource conservation, and character of the City, and establishes an overall development capacity for the City through the year 2040. The General Plan Update would accommodate a total of 500 residential dwelling units and 430,000 SF of retail and off ice development. As part of this eff ort, the City’s General Plan has been reorganized and reformatted to refl ect both current State regulations and the community’s vision for the City. The Downtown Specific Plan (DTSP) Update expands the area covered in the 1996 MSSP to include a segment of Fair Oaks Avenue, in addition to Mission Street. The DTSP Update includes policies and strategies to preserve historic assets, encourage contextual infill development of vacant and under-utilized parcels, create jobs, and maintain and support existing compatible businesses and industry, as well as accommodate housing for a variety of income levels. Key environmental issues for the PEIR include preservation of historic resources, limiting the allowable growth and development in order to manage traff ic and circulation, and water supply constraints. Additionally, the PEIR refl ects the City’s priorities for maintaining the tree canopy and addressing the eff ects of climate change. COMPLETION DATE Ongoing REFERENCE Joanna Hankamer Planning and Community Development Director City of South Pasadena (310) 721-1224 jhankamer@ southpasadenaca.gov KEY PROJECT ELEMENTS General Plan and Speciﬁ c Plan Update EIR in the San Gabriel Valley Planning for Metro Gold Line Station and Other Progressive Transportation Policies Key Issues: Historic Resources, Maintenance of Established Neighborhoods, Traf ﬁ c, Water Supply 437 27Statement of Qualiﬁ cations Aviation Station Transit-Oriented Development EIR Los Angeles County, CA/ Cox, Castle & Nicholson, LLP | County of Los Angeles Psomas prepared the EIR; a shade/shadow analysis; and the Air Quality, Greenhouse Gas, Noise, and Cultural Resources Technical Analyses. The project, located near Los Angeles International Airport (LAX), involves the demolition of existing land uses and the construction of an urban mixed-use development that would include 29,500 SF of ground- fl oor commercial uses and 390 multi-family residential units. Project entitlements include a General Plan Amendment, Conditional Use Permit and Zone Change, as well as approvals from the Airport Land Use Commission and the Local Agency Formation Commission for the County of Los Angeles. The Aviation Station project would relocate the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (Metro) bus terminal from the southern side of Metro’s Green Line Aviation/LAX station to the northern side of the station, resulting in the need to reconfigure an adjacent Caltrans Park-and-Ride lot. The project involves multiple stakeholders, including Metro and the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) District 7, and required the de-annexation of property from the City of Los Angeles into the County of Los Angeles. Key environmental issues addressed in the EIR include multi-agency coordination; aircraft noise from LAX, light rail (Metro Green Line) and bus/vehicle noise (Metro bus terminal); shade and shadow casting on nearby single-family residential units; cut-through traff ic and street parking; and construction dust impacts. COMPLETION DATE 2012 KEY PROJECT ELEMENTS EIR for Mixed-Use Project Adjacent to Existing Established Residential Community Multiple Agency Involvement: Caltrans; Metro; City of Los Angeles; County of Los Angeles; LAFCO Key Issues: Air Quality and Noise from I-105; Shade and Shadow; Trafﬁ c 438 28Statement of Qualiﬁ cations El Segundo Project Experience El Segundo, CA/City of El Segundo Prior to joining Psomas, Glenn Lajoie served as the principal point of contact and Project Manager for environmental review assignments, including the following: CEQA Consulting Services Projects included the Cambria Suites Hotel IS/MND, Equinix Data Center Project EA 893 IS/MND, Nash Street Data Center IS/MND, Park Place Extension and Grade Separation EIR/EA, Queen Esther Square Shopping Center Project, 600-630 North Sepulveda Boulevard IS/MND, Raytheon South Campus Specific Plan EIR, Chevron Refinery Administration and Support Facilities IS/MND, and The Lakes Specific Plan and Topgolf Project EIR. El Segundo South Campus (Raytheon) Speciﬁ c Plan EIR The project proposed to establish maximum allowable development within the Specific Plan area boundaries of 4,231,547 gross square feet, or an additional 2,142,457 gross square feet over existing conditions. Proposed uses within the Specific Plan area included off ice, warehousing, light industrial, and commercial (retail/restaurant) uses. The Plan also proposed extensive utility improvements, and vehicular and non-vehicular circulation improvements to El Segundo Boulevard, Nash Street, and Continental Boulevard. Queen Esther Square Shopping Center Project IS/MND The project proposed to demolish the existing full-service Sizzler restaurant and construct a drive-through fast food In-N-Out Burger restaurant. Additionally, the project involved reclassification of two existing restaurants (Smarco’s and Chinese Food Express): Adjustment (ADJ No. 11-01); a potential right-of-way dedication on Sepulveda Boulevard; and modifications to the original Conditions of Approval for the existing shopping center. Park Place Extension and Grade Separation EIR/EA The project called for an extension of Park Place and the closing of an approximately quarter-mile gap between Allied Way and Nash Street to provide additional connectivity and reduce traff ic congestion in the site vicinity. The project involved a roadway/rail grade separation in addition to the potential relocation of existing railroad tracks. COMPLETION DATE Varies by project REFERENCE Paul Samaras Principal Planner City of El Segundo (310) 524-2340 psamaras@elsegundo.org KEY PROJECT ELEMENTS On-Call Services to the City Master Plan CEQA Review Complex and Comprehensive Analysis Successful Documentation and Processing 439 29Statement of Qualiﬁ cations Princessa Crossroads Development EIR Santa Clarita, CA/City of Santa Clarita The proposed Princessa Crossroads Development, located in the City of Santa Clarita, consists of 710 residential units and 680,000 SF of business park/retail/off ice uses on 189.2-acre project site. The proposed mixed-use development would include five planning areas, two designated for single- and multi-family residential and the remaining three for business park/retail/off ice uses. The project site is surrounded on the west by Golden Valley Road; on the north by the City of Santa Clarita Activities Center; to the east by vacant undeveloped land and residential uses; and to the south by Golden Valley High School and Robert C. Lee Parkway. The project site would be primarily accessed from the extension of Via Princessa, easterly from Golden Valley Road. Access to the future residential and commercial development would be provided by proposed internal public and private streets. Psomas’ Environmental Planning Group prepared an Environmental Impact Report for the proposed project and provided peer review services on all technical studies/ analyses provided by the applicant. Numerous entitlements were required for the project, including Specific Plan; General Plan amendment and Zone Change; tentative tract map; conditional use permit; development review; hillside development review; oak tree permit; and ridgeline alteration permit. The project would be phased based on market demands, and it is anticipated that development would be completed approximately three to five years from the start of construction. COMPLETION DATE July 2019 REFERENCE Ben Jarvis, AICP (661) 259-2489 bjarvis@santa-clarita.com KEY PROJECT ELEMENTS City of Santa Clarita Project EIR and Technical Studies Multiple Agency Coordination 440 30Statement of Qualiﬁ cations Avenue R Complete Streets and Safe Routes to School Palmdale, CA/City of Palmdale Through a competitive process, Psomas was retained by the City of Palmdale to provide environmental clearance and develop construction documents for infrastructure enhancements to accomplish a Complete Streets approach along Avenue R from Sierra Highway to 25th Street East. Psomas prepared a full range of technical studies (Natural Environment Study [NES], Draft Relocation Impact Statement [DRIS], Community Impact Assessment [CIA] memo) in support of the Initial Study/ Environmental Assessment (IS/EA) on an expedited schedule due to use of federal funding sources. This approach fulfilled the immediate need to accommodate all modes of transportation including pedestrian, bicycle, and transit access improvements within the project area and serve the underprivileged residents in the community and students. An important element of the project was sidewalk gap closures, including significant areas where no curb exists at the edge of the travel way, thus providing no pathway for pedestrians. Widening of Avenue R included a Class II bike lane on the north and south side of the street to reduce the potential for collisions with bicycles and pedestrians. Completion of a two-way left-turn lane provides “refuge” for left turning cars and bicycles at mid-block. The project included extensive right of way activities including relocation of residents, businesses and utility facilities, preparation of construction bid documents, and engineering support during construction. Psomas has been particularly instrumental in helping the City overcome a funding authorization issue. Prior to release of the RFP, Caltrans determined that a Categorical Exemption/Categorical Exclusion (CE/CE) would be the appropriate environmental documentation for clearing NEPA and CEQA. Psomas determined this was incorrect; and that, in fact, an IS/EA leading to a Mitigated Negative Declaration/Finding of No Significant Impact would be required. This placed the E76 funding for design, right of way, and construction in jeopardy. Psomas was particularly instrumental in helping the City overcome a funding authorization issue. Psomas, through close and aggressive coordination with Caltrans, and with support from the City, was able to shave six months off the delivery schedule for the environmental document. This gave the City the opportunity to apply for funding timing extensions and keep the project on track. Construction documents developed include street improvement (plans & profiles), signing/striping, traff ic signal modification, lighting, as well as drainage improvement plans which include storm drain and the underlying hydrology and hydraulic studies based on the City’s Master Plan of Drainage. Transitions and tapers of curb alignment were optimized to result in minimal right-of-way takes. COMPLETION DATE Ongoing REFERENCE Lynn Glidden (661) 267-5315 lglidden@cityofpalmdale. org KEY PROJECT ELEMENTS Coordinated work with subcontractors and City with minimum interference with City’s daily business Familiar with Palmdale Planning and Permitting Requirements Complete Streets Project Funding Administration through Caltrans Active Transportation Safety Improvements Utility 441 31Statement of Qualiﬁ cations 57 Wheeler Avenue Mixed-Use Project Initial Study/ Mitigated Negative Declaration Arcadia, CA/City of Arcadia Psomas prepared an Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND) for this project, which involved the construction and operation of a four-story mixed-use structure with three stories of residential units (totaling 38 units) over approximately 16,175 SF of ground-fl oor commercial uses and one level of underground parking. The project site is located adjacent to the future Metro Gold Line transit station in the City of Arcadia and was designed to facilitate the City’s objective of creating an active mixed-use and transit-oriented corridor in the vicinity of the Gold Line. The project would develop an outdoor plaza with outdoor seating and landscaping that separates the project site from the existing adjacent 24-Hour Fitness located to the north. The project required demolition of a surface parking lot and a building, which was evaluated for historic significance. Psomas prepared a Cultural Resources Report, an air quality and greenhouse gas analysis, and a noise evaluation in support of the IS/MND. Key environmental issues addressed in the IS/MND include the provision of adequate parking during peak hours; potential historic resources; removal of street trees; subterranean excavation for the parking garage adjacent to developed structures; and construction-related noise and traff ic. COMPLETION DATE June 2015 REFERENCE Lisa L. Flores (626) 574-5445 lflores@arcadia.ca.us KEY PROJECT ELEMENTS Mixed-Use/Inﬁ ll Transit Oriented Mixed-Use Adjacent to Commuter Rail Line Station Urban Location Parking/Street Tree Removal/ Potential Historic Resources 442 32Statement of Qualiﬁ cations Palmdale CEQA Project Experience Palmdale, CA/City of Palmdale Prior to joining Psomas, Glenn Lajoie served as the principal point of contact and Project Manager for environmental review assignments, including Palmdale Expansion Area Amendment to the Redevelopment Plans EIR, Palmdale Housing Element EIR, and Palmdale Transit Village Specific Plan/General Plan Amendment EIR. Palmdale Expansion Area Amendment to the Redevelopment Plans EIR Glenn served as Project Manager for this project while with another firm. The proposal involved an Amendment to the Redevelopment Plan for the Merged Project Area involving 7,787 acres. This increased the total acreage of the Merged Project Area to 15,255 acres. The Expansion Area included United States Air Force Plant 42, the former Palmdale Business Park Specific Plan Area, and residential areas. Buildout of the Merged Project Area would allow for an additional 1,732 residential dwelling units and approximately 19 million SF of non-residential uses. The Program EIR provided a comprehensive review of topic areas including detailed review of traff ic, air, greenhouse gases, noise water quality, biological resources and cultural resources. Palmdale Housing Element EIR While with another firm, Glenn served as Project Director for this EIR, which included a General Plan Amendment, Zone Change and Specific Plan Amendment. The project involved amendments to the Land Use and Housing Elements to accommodate units assigned to the City under RHNA for 2006 to 2014. Implementation of the project would result in a net increase of 13,001 dwelling units throughout the City. Key environmental issues addressed included traff ic, air quality, greenhouse gas emissions, noise, and public services and utilities. Palmdale Transit Village Speciﬁ c Plan/General Plan Amendment EIR Glenn served as Project Manager for this project while with another firm. The project involved 110 acres generally between Technology Drive and Avenue Q-3 and between 3rd Street East and the Metrolink Railroad tracks, adjacent to Sierra Highway. The Palmdale Transportation Center supplements existing stations in Lancaster and Acton, providing rail service between the Antelope Valley and the Los Angeles area. The Center provides the opportunity to link land use planning policies and programs within the area. Specifically, the City identified the Center as an opportunity for TOD, which is characterized by a mix of uses surrounding a transit facility, where streets have a high level of connectivity, blocks are relatively small, and streetscapes, buildings and uses cater to pedestrians. COMPLETION DATE Varies by project REFERENCE Susan Koleda Community Development Director La Cañada Flintridge (formerly with the City of Palmdale) (818) 790-8881 skoleda@lcf.ca.gov KEY PROJECT ELEMENTS Policy Environmental Review Programmatic CEQA Compliance Density Modiﬁ cations and Analysis 443 33Statement of Qualiﬁ cations Caltrans District 7 On-Call Biological Support Services Ventura, CA/GPA Consulting | Caltrans Psomas provided biological technical support to GPA Environmental as part of an on-call contract with California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) District 7. As part of this contract, Psomas provided services on several projects that required expertise with a particular special status species. Psomas conducted protocol focused surveys for least Bell’s vireo and southwestern willow fl ycatcher; a habitat assessment for arroyo toad and California red-legged frog; and a jurisdictional delineation for State Route (SR) 118 at SR-34 and Donlon Road intersection project near Somis. A memo with recommended mitigation measures to avoid and minimize impacts to least Bell’s vireo (present on the project site) was also provided to support Caltrans’ preparation of the Natural Environment Study for the project. Psomas also conducted protocol focused surveys for tidewater goby at the SR-1 at Calleguas Creek project, a project to remove sediment along the creek located near Point Mugu; tidewater goby was present in the survey area. Psomas also provided biological monitoring support during the Lion Creek Slope Repair project located near Ojai. Psomas’ biological monitors ensured protective measures were in place to protect water quality in the creek, which was occupied by arroyo chub, western pond turtle, and two-striped garter snake, and had potential to be occupied by the southern steelhead. Daily monitoring reports were provided and a final report summarizing the biological monitoring eff orts was prepared. COMPLETION DATE December 2013 REFERENCE Richard Galvin (310) 792-2690 richard@gpaenv.com KEY PROJECT ELEMENTS Habitat Assessment/Focused surveys for special status species Jurisdictional Delineation Biological Monitoring 444 34Statement of Qualiﬁ cations Upper Amargosa Creek Recharge Project Palmdale, CA/City of Palmdale The proposed approximate $6.5 million fl ood control, water conservation, habitat restoration and recreational open space project will modify the existing alignment of the Upper Amargosa Creek to construct 11 new off -channel ground water recharge basins for increased groundwater recharge to the Antelope Valley Groundwater Basin. The basins will receive supply water from the State Water Project. This is a Prop 1E and local match funded project. The project improvements include: Grading of a new one-mile-long earthen trapezoidal channel dike fl ood system and placement of 9-inch-thick soil cement liner embankments along a natural bottom Grading of 11 recharge basins encompassing approximately 35 acres of recharge zone Grading of an ADA-compliant park trail system encompassing almost two miles. The trail system features include 8-foot-wide pathway, 10 interpretive plaque stations at various points along the trail, decomposed granite surface, and park amenities including six rest areas featuring decorative canopy structures, and park and picnic benches. Two 24-inch RCP drainage spillway systems, and extension of the 36-inch RCP storm drain pipelines for the parallel system for 25th Street, and at both Delta Way and Louise Lane, and 15 inter-basin and outlet drainage structures and fl ap gates Installation of approximately 400 LF of 48-inch diameter field welded CML&C steel water pipeline and approximately 60 LF of concrete encasement and butterfl y valve Installation of approximately 3,300 LF of C905 PVC water distribution pipeline systems and air/vac and blowoff valves, and seven turnout pipeline systems and fl owmeter and pinch and butterfl y valves COMPLETION DATE Ongoing REFERENCE Mike Shahbakhti, PE (661) 267-5310 mshahbakhti@ cityofpalmdale.org KEY PROJECT ELEMENTS Roadway Improvements Storm Drain Improvements Streetscape Improvements 445 35Statement of Qualiﬁ cations Design/build and installation of a 96-foot-long by 12-foot-wide steel tubular truss pedestrian bridge spanning the new channel Restoration of 25 acres of habitat along Amargosa Creek to include removing trash and cleanup, planting native plants, removing invasive and non-desirable plant species, and installing over two miles of lodge pole wood decorative fencing Environmental monitoring and habitat protections and mitigations are incorporated throughout the project and include: Preparation of a Joshua Tree Transplantation/preservation report, and implementation of Joshua Tree relocations of 66 trees Preparation of a Habitat Restoration/Mitigation Program and Native Desert Preservation Plan that provides guidelines for the successful creation (11.28 acres), restoration (30.41 acres), and enhancement (8.31 acres) of desert scrub and woodland habitats as compensation for impacts associated with the project Upper Amargosa Creek Recharge Project 446 36Statement of Qualiﬁ cations City of Anaheim Planning Department Environmental Services On-Call Anaheim, CA/City of Anaheim Psomas has provided environmental services for the City of Anaheim Community Development Department (City) Planning Department since 1994 through consecutive on-call contracts including our current contract awarded in 2020. Environmental documentation completed under this On-Call includes Master EIRs, Supplemental EIRs, Initial Studies/Mitigated Negative Declarations, Validation Reports, Addenda, and Peer Review services. Project types have included infill, mixed-use, residential, retail, parking lots, and entertainment/hotel venues, many of which are located in the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan (ARSP) or the Disneyland Resort Specific Plan (DRSP). Key projects that have been completed under the On-Call include: Anaheim Convention Center Grand Plaza Addendum to the Final EIR No. 313 Anaheim Resort Specific Plan Supplemental Master EIR No. 340, Master EIR Revalidation Reports, and Addenda Anaheim GardenWalk IS/MND/ Subsequent Addenda Peer reviews for multiple IS/MNDs including OC Mixed Use Project Peer Review, Savanna Townhomes Project, Anaheim Public Storage Disneyland Resort Eastern Gateway Project Addendum to Final EIR Report No. 311 and Supplemental EIR Report No. 340 Country Inn and Suites Addendum to Supplemental EIR No. 340 Element Anaheim Hotel Project Addendum to the Final EIR No. 311 and Supplemental EIR No. 340 Hilton Garden Inn and Home2 Suites Hotel Project IS/MND Marriott Springhill Suites IS/MND Ramada Maingate Project IS/MND Hyatt Place IS/MND JW Marriott at Anaheim GardenWalk Project Addendum to the Pointe Anaheim IS/MND Hotel Project at 1441 S. Manchester IS/MND 2017 Toy Story Parking Lot Expansion Project Addendum to Supplemental EIR No. 340 Nigel Cast Parking Lot Addendum to Supplemental Environmental Impact Report No. 340 Anaheim GardenWalk Amendment to CUP Addendum Anaheim Resort Specific Plan EIR No. 340 Validation Report COMPLETION DATE Ongoing REFERENCE Susan Kim, AICP, LEED AP Principal Planner City of Anaheim (714) 765-5286 skim@anaheim.net KEY PROJECT ELEMENTS On-Call Contract Experience Mixed-Use, In-ﬁ ll, Commercial, Residential, and Entertainment Uses Programmatic, Tiered, and Project-Level Documents 447 37Statement of Qualiﬁ cations Queen of the Valley Specific Program EIR Los Angeles County, CA/City of West Covina Psomas prepared a comprehensive Program EIR for a new master plan and Specific Plan for the Queen of the Valley Hospital in West Covina. The hospital proposed to expand its facilities from 1.1 to 1.58 MSF plus two parking structures in approximately five phases to provide expanded and more eff icient medical and support services to the community. The work would involve adding several new buildings and renovating and demolishing a number of existing structures. The Psomas Team includes KTGY to prepare the Specific Plan and HR&A to prepare a fiscal impact assessment for the project. Psomas also prepared air quality, greenhouse gas emissions, noise, and traff ic studies. Psomas is currently working with the hospital and the City in implementing Phase I of the planned expansion. COMPLETION DATE November 2019 REFERENCE Jo-Anne Burns Planning Manager City of West Covina (626) 939-8761 jburns@westcovina.org KEY PROJECT ELEMENTS In-ﬁ ll/Redevelopment Four-Phase Redevelopment Program EIR Preparation of Multiple Technical Studies 448 38Statement of Qualiﬁ cations Magnolia Tank Farm Specific Plan PEIR Huntington Beach, CA/City of Huntington Beach Psomas prepared a Program Environmental Impact Report (PEIR) pursuant to CEQA for the Magnolia Tank Farm Project. Psomas worked closely with the City in preparation of the NOP, draft and final EIRs, and Responses to Comments. In addition, Psomas conducted a Scoping Meeting and a Planning Commission Study Session. The project site is located within the Coastal Zone, adjacent to Magnolia Marsh in the City of Huntington Beach. The project site previously contained three oil storage tanks that were demolished in 2017. The Draft PEIR evaluated two development alternatives at an equal level of consideration. The alternatives were identified as the proposed project (mixed-use) and Alternative 1 (residential). Under the proposed project, the Specific Plan will establish a land use plan and develop standards and guidelines to allow for creation of the proposed mixed-use development comprised of a 211,000 SF lodge/guest house accommodations with a maximum of 215 rooms, including 175 guest rooms and family/group overnight accommodations with 40 rooms; 19,000 SF of ancillary and visitor-serving retail and dining; and up to 250 for sale residential units (at 15 dwelling units per acre). Additionally, the proposed project includes 2.8 acres of Coastal Conservation area adjacent to Magnolia Marsh and 2.8 acres of park. Alternative 1 would eliminate the lodge, guesthouse, and retail components, and would include a residential development at a maximum of 250 residential units (at 11 dwelling units per acre). All other components, including park and open space described above under the proposed project, would remain the same. COMPLETION DATE December 2019 REFERENCE Ricky Ramos Senior Planner Department of Community Development City of Huntington Beach (714) 536-5624 rramos@surfcity-hb.org KEY PROJECT ELEMENTS Mixed-Use, Inﬁ ll Redevelopment Brownﬁ eld Redevelopment Adjacent Sensitive Magnolia Marsh Preparation of Multiple Technical Studies Peer Review of Existing Technical Studies 449 39Statement of Qualiﬁ cations RESUMES Team Member Resumes Psomas currently employs a staff of nearly 600 employees with over 50 professionals assigned to the Environmental Group in Southern California. Psomas’ Environmental Group is located primarily in two off ices in Southern California (Santa Ana and Pasadena) and staff ing assignments are made based on an individual’s experience and workload/availability rather than the location of their “home” off ice. Managers and staff frequently travel to diff erent off ices for project needs. Proposed key team members’ resumes follow, highlighting their individual qualifications including years of experience, relevant experience, and certification/ permits. Additional staff qualifications are available upon request. Section 13 450 40Statement of Qualiﬁ cations Jim Hunter, ENV SP Principal-in-Charge and QA/QC Manager Jim Hunter, ENV SP, will serve as Principal-in-Charge for the Psomas Team. He has 34 years of experience providing strategic land use entitlement, environmental, and regulatory compliance services to private industry, municipal, and utility clients in Southern California. He has successfully managed the growth of consulting off ices of engineers, planners, and scientists to deliver seamless client-centric solutions. Key experiences include assembling and leading high performing teams in the areas of CEQA and/or NEPA environmental review and permitting; pre-construction planning; and construction compliance monitoring for major land development and capital infrastructure across Southern California. Jim’s experience with multi-disciplinary and complex projects includes serving as Principal-in-Charge, and Contract Manager for multiple on-call contracts including those for Los Angeles County Public Works Water Resources Branch, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California Planning Services, University of California, Los Angeles, and University of California, Riverside. Jim Hunter’s responsibilities on this project will include coordination with the Project Manager to ensure future projects are on schedule and within budget; provision of strategic consultation; and serving as QA/QC manager of environmental documents. Experience West Valley Feeder No. 1 Stage 3 Project Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration, Southern California: Principal-in- Charge/Project Manager for preparation of an IS/MND for the Metropolitan Water District’s (Metropolitan’s) West Valley Feeder No. 1 (WVF1) Stage 3 Project. The project site is located on approximately 0.46 acre within the north/ northwestern portion of Chatsworth Park South where the San Fernando Valley fl oor borders the adjacent Simi Hills/Santa Susana Mountains in the community of Chatsworth, in the City of Los Angeles, and the County of Los Angeles. Existing surrounding development is characterized by the Chatsworth Park South facility, single-family residences to the east, and undeveloped hillside terrain within the Santa Susana Pass State Historic Park. A railroad right-of- way is located north of the project site, and informal multi-use trails are located throughout the project site and serve pedestrian, bicycling, and equestrian uses. The purpose of the proposed project is to continue pipeline improvements implemented by Stages 1 and 2 of the WVF1 Valve Modification Project. Berth 97-109 Container Terminal Project Environmental Impact Statement/Environmental Impact Report, Port of Los Angeles, CA: Project Manager for the EIS/EIR for a proposed container terminal at Berth 97-109 with a throughput of approximately 1.55 million 20-foot equivalent units (TEUs) in the Port of Los Angeles (adjacent to the Vincent Thomas Bridge). Key issues include air quality and health risks, noise, traff ic, aesthetics, and water quality. EIR/EIS preparation included strategic guidance; oversight and review of technical evaluations and subconsultant performance; and collaboration with legal counsel, including defense of a complaint against the project filed in Los Angeles Superior Court. EDUCATION 1984/BS/Environmental Planning and Management/ University of California, Davis CERTIFICATIONS Envision Sustainability Professional/Institute for Sustainable Infrastructure PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS Association of Environmental Professionals EXPERIENCE With Psomas for 4 years; with other firms for 30 years 451 41Statement of Qualiﬁ cations On-Call Environmental Planning Services, Metropolitan Water District, Southern California: Principal-in-Charge/Project Manager for this five year (2016-2021) environmental contract. Projects completed include technical studies for the Lake Mathews Outlet Tower (biological and noise) and the Copper Basin Dam Valve Replacement-Site (biological); Currently ongoing is an IS/MND for West Valley Feeder No. 1 Stage 3 Improvements Project in Los Angeles, and construction mitigation monitoring for the Diemer Filter Outlet Conduit Seismic Upgrade (biological, paleontological and general environmental). As-Needed Environmental Services for Water Resources Core Service Area, Los Angeles County Public Works, Los Angeles County, CA: Principal-in-Charge/Contract Manager for the County of Los Angeles Public Works Waterworks District to provide environmental review, biological, and cultural support services on various water resources projects that include maintenance, repair, and construction of facilities, channels and streams, dams, bridges, etc. Under this contract, Jim is responsible for resource allocation; strategy on complex issues; and contract implementation. As-Needed Consultant Services, Los Angeles County Parks & Recreation Division, Los Angeles County, CA: Principal in Charge for a three year master services agreement for environmental services for various Park and Recreation Department’s facilities related to their facilities and programs. Services include CEQA and NEPA Documentation, Regulatory Permitting, Habitat Resources, Cultural Resources Assessment, and Mitigation Monitoring. Psomas’ first task order was an Addendum to the Earvin “Magic” Johnson Recreation Area Master Plan Environmental Impact Report and Addenda. Capital Programs On-Call Contracts, University of California, Los Angeles, CA: Contract Manager for the current On-Call Contract thru March 2020 with the University of California, Los Angeles for environmental services for Capital Programs improvements. Current Psomas work includes pre-construction nesting bird and raptor surveys for the Southwest Campus Apartments. On-Call Non-Project Specific Environmental Consulting Services, University of California, Riverside, CA: Contract Manager for Psomas’ On-Call contract with the University of California, Riverside for environmental consulting services. The original one-year term ending July 2019 can be extended up to five years. Recent work includes regulatory services for the Botanic Garden Basin Maintenance Project, tree surveys, and the IS/MND for the Student Success Center. Maywood Mutual Water Company No. 3, Water Quality Improvement IS/MND, Maywood, Bell, and Vernon, CA: Principal in Charge for the preparation of an IS/MND for this project. The IS/MND will evaluate the improvements of various facilities within the MMWC3 water systems service area. Per the District’s Capital Improvement Projects, the proposed project actions include rehabilitation of an approximate 450,000-gallon welded steel tank (Prospect Tank) and associated tank appurtenances; replacement of approximately 4,600 feet of pipe segment; valve replacements, and fire hydrant repair and replacements. The project also requires preparation of supplemental documentation pursuant to the Federal Cross-Cutter Regulations pursuant to SWRCB requirements. Jim Hunter, ENV SP (Continued) 452 42Statement of Qualiﬁ cations Glenn Lajoie, AICP Vice President/Senior Project Manager Glenn Lajoie, AICP, has over 30 years of experience in the environmental planning profession. Glenn’s diverse background includes a wide range of CEQA and NEPA compliance studies, including policy, development and infrastructure projects. He has served in various roles on projects including Project Director, Project Manager, Quality Control and lead for navigating complex regulatory processes. Glenn is a recognized leader in environmental analysis and compliance and his background has also encompassed policy planning programs such as General Plans, Specific Plans, neighborhood studies and due diligence analysis. His skill sets include project and budget management, quality assurance, meeting facilitation, agency staff service assistance and third-party peer review verification of analysis and findings. Glenn has an extensive background with local and regional agencies throughout California. The geographic context is wide-ranging and includes resort and destination projects in the Town of Mammoth Lakes; numerous infrastructure and desalination project reviews in the Community of Cambria; downtown high-rise and mixed use proposals in Long Beach; city center and neighborhood revitalization opportunities in Lancaster; buildout of the City’s Business Park Master Plan in Cypress; over two million square foot expansion of the Raytheon Corporate facility in El Segundo; campus modernization and enhancement projects at the University of California, Riverside; and the master plan for beautification and growth at the Hotel del Coronado. With each assignment, regardless of the project, Glenn’s primary objective is to focus on assuringintegrity, quality and legal defensibility of analysis and processes, culminating in win-win solutions for clients and communities. Experience CEQA Consulting Services, El Segundo, CA: Prior to joining Psomas, Glenn served as Project Manager for On-Call Environmental Review projects with the City of El Segundo. Projects included the Cambria Suites Hotel IS/MND, the Equinix Data Center Project EA 893 IS/MND, the Nash Street Data Center IS/ MND, Park Place Extension and Grade Separation EIR/EA, Queen Esther Square Shopping Center Project (EA 912 and CUP 11-02) the 600-630 North Sepulveda Boulevard IS/MND, the Raytheon South Campus Specific Plan EIR, Chevron Refinery Administration and Support Facilities IS/MND and The Lakes Specific Plan and Topgolf Project EIR. Downtown Lancaster Revitalization Speciﬁ c Plan and EIR, Lancaster, CA: As Project Manager, responsible for overall project management and preparation of a Specific Plan and EIR. The Specific Plan emphasizes the City’s goals to revitalize the unique Business Improvement District, to improve aesthetics, update infrastructure, attract new businesses, and improve the livability of the surrounding neighborhoods. The Specific Plan includes a Transit District, which is located adjacent to the City’s Metrolink Station. The Specific Plan process included an extensive community participation process, as well as economic and market analysis to arrive at a single vision for Downtown Lancaster. The plan included form-based development regulations, which were specifically designed to implement the community-based vision for the EDUCATION 1992/MPA/Public Policy and Administration/California State University, Long Beach 1985/BA/Geography/Urban Studies/California State University, Long Beach CERTIFICATIONS American Institute of Certified Planners/ No. 087288/American Planning Association PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS Member, Board of Directors, and former President/Orange County, California Chapter/ American Planning Association Association of Environmental Professionals Instructor/Introduction to Planning/California State University, Long Beach EXPERIENCE With Psomas for 1 year; with other firms for 33 years 453 43Statement of Qualiﬁ cations Downtown. The Program EIR served as the master environmental document for future project applications within the Specific Plan area. Long Point (Terranea) Resort Project EIR, Rancho Palos Verdes, CA: As Project Manager, responsible for overall project management and preparation of the EIR. The proposal included development of a full-service hotel providing approximately 582 guestrooms, restaurants/bars, and meeting/function spaces. The project also involved approximately 31.6 acres of conserved/enhanced habitat and approximately 81 acres of public open space/recreation facilities including public parking, shoreline access ramps, public parks/overlooks, public walking/ hiking trails, a public golf practice facility and a nine-hole public-use golf course. The EIR addressed two separate components. The Lower Point Vicente, which sits on the coastal bluff and has historically been referred to as the former Marineland site, was proposed as a hotel complex and resort amenities. The Upper Point Vicente (north of Lower-Point Vicente), which is land under city ownership, was primarily proposed for golf course and conservation areas. Key environmental issues included biological resources, traff ic, public safety (golf), geologic stability of the bluff s, view impacts, and alternatives. The analysis involved an extensive number of concerns and issues raised by community groups and residents. Historic Downtown Upland Specific Plan EIR, Upland, CA: As Project Director, responsible for overseeing and QA/QC the preparation of a Program EIR. The Specific Plan included nine districts, consisting of 210 acres, and provided a clear framework for future development and public improvements in Downtown Upland. The Specific Plan would serve as a tool for the City to encourage economic revitalization and create a walkable, vibrant, transitoriented downtown for Upland. The environmental review involved aesthetics/ light and glare, air quality, cultural resources, hazards and hazardous materials, hydrology and water quality, land use, noise, population and housing, public services and utilities, and traff ic and parking. Dana Point Town Center Plan IS/MND, Dana Point, CA: Principal- in- Charge responsible for overseeing and QA/QC for the preparation of the IS/ MND. The Town Center Plan proposed to establish a more vibrant, community- oriented Town Center for residents and visitors. Project characteristics included traff ic and circulation improvements, pedestrian walkways, design enhancements, development standards, and historic preservation measures. Potential impacts as a result of the project were analyzed for short-term construction activities as well as long-term operations. Mitigation measures included compliance with SCAQMD regulations, historic preservation measures, preparation of a water quality management plan, compliance with the Noise Ordinance and a traff ic signal-timing plan. Shoreline Gateway EIR, Long Beach, CA: As Principal-in-Charge, responsible for oversight and QA/QC of the preparation of a Project and Supplemental EIR. The project EIR evaluated a mixed-use development involving a 22-story residential tower, a 15- to 19-story stepped slab building, and a 10-story building on one parcels (approximately 2.2 acres), generally located north of Ocean Boulevard, between Atlantic and Alamitos Avenues. The Supplemental EIR addressed development of a 35-story residential tower on the site. The location of the project site serves as an entrance to the East Village Arts District and the eastern edge of the downtown. The environmental review involved an aesthetic analysis, including light/glare, shade/shadow and land use compatibility, traff ic and parking, air quality, noise, historic resources, hazardous materials assessment, and public services, and utilities. Glenn Lajoie, AICP (Continued) 454 44Statement of Qualiﬁ cations EDUCATION 1999/BS/Natural Resources, Planning and Interpretation/Humboldt State University PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS American Society of Civil Engineers Environmental and Water Resources Institute EXPERIENCE With Psomas for 21 years; with other firms for 1 year Jennifer Marks Senior Project Manager Jennifer Marks is a Senior Project Manager with 22 years of experience in environmental documentation and analysis consistent with CEQA and NEPA. Jennifer’s career has focused on a wide variety of projects, including mixed- use, residential, off ice, and resort developments; specific plan and general plan analyses; transportation infrastructure; and various utility infrastructure projects. She has managed multiple water and wastewater infrastructure projects, including projects for the Santa Margarita Water District; Irvine Ranch Water District; City of Anaheim Public Utilities Department for water projects and Public Works Department for sewer projects; and the Water Replenishment District of Southern California. She has also prepared environmental documentation and supplemental information to meet specific agency requirements, including those for the following agencies: Caltrans; State Water Resources Control Board; U.S. Bureau of Reclamation; U.S. Environmental Protection Agency; USACE; USFWS; CDFW; various local planning and development departments; and private developers. Through her project work, Jennifer has developed strong working relationships with agency personnel, County and City staff , private developers, and a variety of specialty consultants. Experience University of California, Los Angeles, 2008 Northwest Housing Infill Project and Associated Long Range Development Plan Amendment EIR, Los Angeles, CA: Environmental Analyst for this project, which provided infill undergraduate housing consisting of up to 1,525 beds and residential support uses on four sites in the Northwest zone of the campus. The proposed Northwest Housing Infill Project required an Amendment to the 2002 Long Range Development Plan to provide an additional 550,000 SF in the Northwest zone. Jennifer assisted in drafting the Public Services and Utilities Sections for the EIR. City of Anaheim Planning Department Environmental Services On-Call, Anaheim, CA: Project Manager for multiple on-call service contracts with the City of Anaheim Planning Department. Project work has included preparation of the following: IS/MNDs for six hotel and mixed use projects within the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan (ARSP); IS/MND for the ARSP Amendment No. 7 for the Inclusion of Residential Uses in two targeted areas within the ARSP area; four separate addendums to the original IS/MND for the Anaheim GardenWalk Retail/ Dining/Entertainment Complex project (formerly known as the Pointe Anaheim Lifestyle Retail and Entertainment Complex) located in the City of Anaheim as part of The Disneyland Resort Specific Plan, and across Harbor Boulevard from the Disneyland Resort; two addenda to the ARSP Master EIR for the Anaheim Convention Center Grand Plaza and the Nigel Cast Lot; two separate validation reports for the ARSP Master EIR No. 313; and a Supplemental EIR for Amendment No. 14 to the ARSP, which updated the ASRP Master EIR prepared in 1994. Intersection Improvements on Hyperion Avenue and Glendale Boulevard (TOS 004E), Los Angeles, CA: Environmental Project Manager for the intersection improvements funded by LA Metro’s Call for Projects. Scope of services involve traff ic queuing analysis, on-street parking considerations, design of exclusive turn lanes to alleviate queuing and traff ic congestion, Class II 455 45Statement of Qualiﬁ cations Bike lanes, a new crosswalk to facilitate safe pedestrian passage across Glendale Boulevard, traff ic signal improvements, and improving the drainage system and infiltration basins. Jennifer oversaw preparation of a Categorical Exemption Memorandum with a full Initial Study Checklist for the project and managing development of environmental technical studies. Lincoln Bridge Multi-Modal Improvements (LA TOS 27), Los Angeles, CA: Environmental Project Manager for the widening of Lincoln Boulevard from Fiji Way to Jeff erson Boulevard to provide capacity for future light rail transit, with three vehicle lanes in each direction, Class II bicycle lanes, and sidewalks on both sides of the bridge. The project includes replacement of the Lincoln Boulevard Bridge over Ballona Creek, and replacement of the Culver Boulevard overpass while minimizing impacts to the creek and wetlands. Managing preparation of the EIR/Environmental Assessment and supporting technical studies. Tesoro del Valle, Supplemental EIR, Valencia, CA: Project Manager for the development of Phases A, B, and C of the Tesoro del Valle residential project north of Santa Clarita in unincorporated Los Angeles County. The project involves the continued development of the Tesoro del Valle project that was originally approved for development in 1999 and proposes development of up to 820 residential units and ancillary recreational uses. A Supplemental EIR is being prepared to update the analysis and address changes to the project. The project involves development of sensitive biological habitat and is located proximate to San Francisquito Creek which is a designated Significant Ecological Area. Maywood Mutual Water Company No. 3, Water Quality Improvement IS/MND, Maywood, Bell, and Vernon, CA: Project Manager for the preparation of the IS/MND. The IS/MND will evaluate the improvements of various facilities within the MMWC3 water systems service area. Per the District’s Capital Improvement Projects, the proposed project actions include rehabilitation of an approximate 450,000-gallon welded steel tank (Prospect Tank) and associated tank appurtenances; replacement of approximately 4,600 feet of pipe segment; valve replacements, and fire hydrant repair and replacements. The project requires preparation of supplemental documentation pursuant to the Federal Cross-Cutter Regulations pursuant to SWRCB requirements. Mt. San Antonio College, Transit Center CEQA and NEPA Documentation, Walnut, CA: Project Manager for the development of a 10-bus bay transit center on the Mt. SAC campus. The project involves reconstruction of an existing surface parking lot to accommodate bus bays, electric charging stations, rider shelters, and an Americans with Disabilities Act-compliant elevator to provide access to the campus to the north. Through an existing Memorandum of Understanding, Mt. SAC is serving as the CEQA lead agency in coordination with Foothill Transit, and the Federal Transit Administration is serving as the NEPA lead agency. Jennifer is actively coordinating with all parties to ensure that the environmental documentation is adequately scoped and will meet all applicable State, federal and agency requirements. Integra Perris Distribution Center Environmental Impact Report, Perris, CA: Assistant Project Manager for the preparation of an Addendum for this project, which involves the expansion of the Integra Perris Distribution Center (IPDC) to include an approximately 10.2-acre parcel located immediately southwest of the IPDC site. The expansion would allow for the construction of a 273,000-SF warehouse building, attached to the west end of the existing IPDC building. Jennifer assisted in the preparation of various sections of the EIR. Jennifer Marks (Continued) 456 46Statement of Qualiﬁ cations Alia Hokuki, AICP Senior Project Manager Alia Hokuki, AICP, is a Senior Project Manager with 23 years of experience in the environmental and policy planning field with a focus on environmental impact assessments for public and private sector clients. Alia’s expertise includes the preparation and management and peer review of environmental compliance documents pursuant to the CEQA and NEPA. She has managed and prepared a number of CEQA and NEPA documents for a variety of projects, including mixed-use; urban infill and redevelopment; commercial and retail; high-density residential and planned communities; institutional (including universities and healthcare); and infrastructure projects. She has extensive knowledge of CEQA, NEPA, and planning and zoning law. Alia’s project experience is diverse, with a strength in land use and land development. In the last four years, her focus has been on land development projects for a variety of project types. Additionally, her work has spanned multiple agencies and jurisdictions. As the Project Manager, Alia will be the day-to-day coordinator with the City and the internal project team with the responsibility to ensure that the work is completed on time and within budget. She will oversee preparation of the environmental documents; ensure all environmental issues are adequately analyzed; and be responsible for preparing critical sections of the environmental documents. Experience Cohen Property Project IS/MND, Orange, CA: Project Manager for the preparation of an IS/MND for a residential project that involves demolition of the existing shopping center, surface parking, and site improvements and construction of 32 single-family detached, two story dwelling units; internal drive aisles; and common open space areas on the 2.9-acre site. The project would provide 19,535 SF of common open space (17,972 SF of landscaping and 1,563 SF of open space at the center of the site) and 22,090 SF of allowable private open space for a total of 41,625 SF of usable open space. Newport Village Mixed-Use Project EIR, Newport Beach, CA: Project Manager for this project, which involves demolishing existing structures and redeveloping the project site as a mixed-use development encompassing approximately 9.4 acres on the north and south sides of the West Coast Highway within the City of Newport Beach’s Mariners’ Mile corridor. The project consists of 14 residential condominium units on the South Parcel and 108 apartment units on the North Parcel and 128,640 SF of nonresidential fl oor area. The project also includes a new publicly accessible waterfront promenade. The Queen of the Valley Hospital Specific Plan Program EIR, West Covina, CA: Senior Quality Assurance/Quality Control Manager for an EIR for a new master plan and Specific Plan for the Queen of the Valley Hospital in West Covina. The project involves expansion of hospital facilities in the coming years plus two new parking structures. Major issues associated with project implementation include traff ic, parking, dust and noise during construction, impacts to an adjacent sports park, school, and apartments, and noise from possible emergency air ambulance (helicopter) services. EDUCATION 1996/Masters of Urban Planning/University of California, Irvine 1991/BA/Development Studies/University of California, Los Angeles CERTIFICATIONS American Institute of Certified Planners/No. 112796/American Planning Association PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS American Planning Association Association of Environmental Professionals EXPERIENCE With Psomas for 5 years; with other firms for 18 years 457 47Statement of Qualiﬁ cations Magnolia Tank Farm EIR, Huntington Beach, CA: Project Manager for the project which proposes redevelopment of the 29-acre site (within the coastal zone) with a mixed-use development consisting of a 230,000 SF lodge that includes a maximum of 175 guest rooms and guesthouse-style, budget-oriented, family/group overnight accommodations with 40 beds, and ancillary resident- and visitor-serving retail and dining; up to 250-unit for-sale residential village; 2.8 acres of Coastal Conservation area adjacent to Magnolia Marsh; and 2.6 acres of park. In addition, the Specific Plan designates the area adjacent to Magnolia Street as Open Space Park along the project sites entire eastern boundary. This open space area contains a pedestrian trail that will link the project’s visitor-serving and residential uses to a future pedestrian trail within the Open Space Conservation area adjacent to the Huntington Beach Channel and the Magnolia Marsh. Port of Long Beach, Pier S Marine Terminal and Back Channel Improvement Environmental Impact Statement/Environmental Impact Report, Long Beach, CA: Senior Project Manager for this project. Alia managed and prepared an EIS/EIR for development of a new container terminal at the 160-acre Pier S site with rail access and improvements to the Back Channel navigational safety. Pacoima Reservoir Restoration Project EIR, Los Angeles County, CA: Project Manager for preparation of an EIR for removal of sediment from the reservoir to preserve the reliability and safety of the dam. Project includes dewatering the reservoir; excavating and removing the sediment; assembling, operating, and partially disassembling the conveyor belt; staging and transporting the sediment to Lopez Spreading Grounds; and trucking the sediment off site. Santa Anita Stormwater Flood Management & Seismic Strengthening Project, Los Angeles, CA: QA/QC Technical Reviewer for the CEQA Consistency Evaluation based on the 2015 Certified Final IS/MND. The Consistency Evaluation has been prepared to assess the adequacy of the previous environmental documentation prepared in compliance with CEQA. Since the plans for the Approved Project were developed and the associated environmental document was certified, modifications have been made to the project components of the Approved Project. The consistency evaluation assesses whether these modifications are substantial enough to result in any new significant impacts or would substantially increase the severity of previously identified environmental impacts. Annandale Canyon Open Space Trail Access Improvements Project, Pasadena, CA: Project Manager for the preparation of an IS/MND for the Annandale Canyon Open Space Trail Access Improvements Project. The project will provide an open space area with accessibility to the public. The City-owned site consists of approximately 23 acres of undeveloped land in Annandale Canyon at the western edge of the City. The project is composed of several improvements to the site, which include a new trailhead at the end of Wierfield Drive, a trail, and an observation point on a hilltop of the San Rafael Hills. Princessa Crossroads Development EIR, Santa Clarita, CA: Project Manager for the preparation of an EIR for the Princessa Crossroads Development. The proposed project consists of 710 residential units and 680,000 SF of business park/retail/off ice uses on 189.2-acre site. The mixed-use development would include five planning areas, two designated for single- and multi-family residential, and the remaining three for business park/retail/off ice uses. Alia Hokuki, AICP (Continued) 458 48Statement of Qualiﬁ cations Jillian Neary Project Manager Jillian Neary is a Project Manager with 21 years of experience in environmental analysis and land use investigation, including 16 years in the preparation of environmental compliance documents pursuant to CEQA, NEPA, and associated State and federal regulations. She has completed documentation for both private- and public-sector clients throughout Southern California and on a wide range of projects, including tract map and master planned communities, infill development and redevelopment, General Plan updates, commercial and industrial developments, recreation projects, and fl ood control and water supply projects. She has expertise evaluating the potential for environmental impacts on all CEQA topics, providing particular expertise in aesthetics, agriculture resources, geology and soils, hazardous materials, parks, and water resources. Experience Aviation Station Transit-Oriented Development Project EIR, Los Angeles County, CA: Environmental Planner for the preparation of an EIR for a mixed-use, transit-oriented project on 5.9 acres within unincorporated Los Angeles County and the City of Los Angeles. The project involves the demolition of existing land uses and the construction of an urban mixed-use development that includes 29,500 SF of ground-fl oor commercial and 390 multi-family residential units. The project also includes relocation of a bus terminal. The project involves multiple stakeholders, including Metro and Caltrans District 7, and requires the de-annexation of property from the City of Los Angeles. Project entitlements include a General Plan Amendment, Conditional Use Permit and Zone Change, and approvals from the Airport Land Use Commission and the Local Agency Formation Commission for the County of Los Angeles. She managed the distribution of the Notice of Preparation (NOP) on behalf of the County of Los Angeles. Jillian assisted all aspects of Draft EIR preparation, and assisted in preparing the Response to Comments, Findings and Statement of Overriding Considerations, and Mitigation Monitoring Program documentation. University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA), Capital Programs On-Call Contracts, Los Angeles, CA: Environmental Analyst for three On-Call Contracts with UCLA since 2001. The project included the following on- and off -campus projects: NanoSystems and Engineering Facilities Plan project EIR; Spieker Aquatic Center IS/ND; 2008 Northwest Housing Infill Project and Long Range Development Plan Amendment EIR; Pauley Pavilion Renovation and Expansion IS/MND; Weyburn Terrace Graduate Student Housing IS/MND; Wasserman Building Project (medical off ice) IS/MND; Ostin Music Center IS/MND; Engineering VI-Phase 1 Building IS/MND; Teaching and Learning Center Building IS/MND; Meyer and Renee Luskin Conference and Guest Center Project EIR; Glenrock and Landfair Apartments Project IS/MND; Stuart House Replacement Project IS/MND; Football Performance Center IS/MND; Engineering VI-Phase 2 Building IS/MND; Basketball Practice Facility IS/MND; Margan Apartments Redevelopment Project IS/MND; Geff en Academy at UCLA EIR; and Anderson School of Management Building Addition IS/ND. EDUCATION 1997/BA/Geology/Indiana University-Purdue University, Indianapolis, IN CERTIFICATIONS Certificate of Completion for LEED for New Construction Technical Review Workshop/U.S. Green Building Council Certificate of Completion for Low Impact Development Seminar/ American Council of Engineering Companies EXPERIENCE With Psomas for 15 years; with other firms for 6 years 459 49Statement of Qualiﬁ cations Interstate 105 Dewatering Wells Project EIR, Los Angeles County, CA: Environmental Planner for the CEQA documentation for this project, which would construct a pipeline and a treatment and blending facility to 1) extract water from Caltrans’ 1-D Series of dewatering wells at Interstate 105; 2) provide treatment to meet current water standards; and 3) deliver the water to the Dominguez Gap Seawater Barrier located in the Wilmington/San Pedro area for injection into the barrier wells as a beneficial reuse. The proposed pipelines cross multiple jurisdictions, including Paramount, Compton, Long Beach, and Carson. Jillian assisted in the preparation of the Screencheck Draft EIR for the project. She prepared the geotechnical, hazardous materials, and public services and utilities EIR analyses, which included review and summary of a 1,200 page Environmental Data Resources (EDR) report describing the agency-listed sites for hazardous materials in the vicinity of the pipelines’ routes. Haines Canyon Channel Outlet Maintenance Draft IS/MND, Los Angeles County, CA: Assistant Project Manager for the CEQA documentation for the Los Angeles County Department of Public Works’ (LACDPW’s) Haines Canyon Channel Outlet Maintenance project. The project proposed to 1) remove accumulated sediment, and possibly trees, that impeded the preferred fl ow of water; 2) regrade the soft-bottom channel; and 3) fill in the ponded area in order to alleviate the standing water and restore the functionality of the fl ood-control channel. Jillian managed the preparation of a Draft IS/MND for the project. She performed a site visit with LACDPW Project Manager, the Project Engineer, and Maintenance Crew for the site; assisted in the preparation of biological resource documentation; and prepared the Draft IS/MND and all required CEQA notices for public review. She also provided consultation to the County of Los Angeles Department of Public Works on CEQA process requirements. As part of response to public comments, Jillian assisted in preparing presentations for a public workshop and she prepared the Response to Comments and Mitigation Monitoring Program documentation. South Pasadena General Plan and Downtown Specific Plan Update Program EIR, South Pasadena, CA: Project Manager for this Program EIR which involves a comprehensive update to both the 1998 South Pasadena General Plan and the 1996 Mission Street Specific Plan (MSSP). The proposed General Plan Update will serve as a long-term policy guide for decision-making regarding the appropriate physical development, resource conservation, and character of the City and establishes an overall development capacity for the City through the year 2040. Debris Basin Maintenance Program IS/MND, Los Angeles County, CA: Environmental Planner for the preparation of an IS/MND pursuant to CEQA to support the issuance of a Long-Term Section 1605 Streambed Alteration Agreement (SAA) from the CDFW. The SAA would permit the continued implementation of the County of Los Angeles Debris Basin Maintenance Program for 161 debris basins. The IS/MND included the creation of a Debris Basin Rankings and Vegetation Replacement Ratios Methodology, which consolidated biological resources information for all 161 debris basins based on the quality of internal and adjacent habitat and presence/absence of special status species in order to determine appropriate replacement ratios. She assisted in the preparation of a detailed memorandum to the County of Los Angeles Department of Public Works, describing the model used, its results, and recommendations for appropriate CEQA clearance of maintenance activities. Jillian Neary (Continued) 460 50Statement of Qualiﬁ cations Daria Sarraf Environmental Planner Daria Sarraf is an Environmental Planner with six years of experience in environmental planning and analyses consistent with CEQA and NEPA. In addition, Daria provides Air Quality, Greenhouse Gas (GHG), and Noise technical analyses/studies for many of Psomas’ projects. She has experience working on a variety of project types, including large land development projects, parks and open spaces, mixed-use, rehabilitation facilities, transit-oriented development, and utility and infrastructure improvements. As an Air Quality/GHG/Noise Specialist, she has experience using the California Emissions Estimator Model (CalEEMod), Roadway Construction Emissions Model, and EMissions FACtors (EMFAC) model. Daria analyzes the results for a myriad of project types from water projects to development projects to infrastructure and industrial projects. Experience Magnolia Tank Farm Specific Plan Program EIR, Huntington Beach, CA: Environmental Planner for the redevelopment of a 29-acre site (within the coastal zone) with a mixed-use development consisting of a 230,000-SF lodge that includes a maximum of 175 guest rooms and guesthouse-style, budget-oriented, family/group overnight accommodations with 40 beds, and ancillary resident- and visitor-serving retail and dining; up to 250-unit for-sale residential village; 2.8 acres of Coastal Conservation area adjacent to Magnolia Marsh; and 2.6 acres of park. In addition, the Specific Plan designates the area adjacent to Magnolia Street as Open Space Park along the project site’s entire eastern boundary. This open space area contains a pedestrian trail that will link the project’s visitor-serving and residential uses to a future pedestrian trail within the Open Space Conservation area adjacent to the Huntington Beach Channel and the Magnolia Marsh. Daria assisted in the preparation of the air quality and GHG sections of the EIR. Inglewood Oil Field Specific Plan Project EIR, Culver City, CA: Environmental Planner for the preparation of an EIR for a Specific Plan that sets forth safeguards and regulations on oil and gas extraction activities in Culver City. The project site is adjacent to the Newport-Inglewood Fault and contains an Alquist-Priolo Fault splay. Up to 30 new wells would be allowed as well as associated storage tanks and pipelines, with requirements and restrictions to ensure the health and safety of the surrounding residential, recreational, and commercial land uses. The Specific Plan allows for the possibility of well stimulation techniques, including fracking, and deep well injection. Daria assisted in the preparation of various sections of the EIR. 57 Wheeler Avenue Mixed-Use Project IS/MND, Arcadia, CA: Environmental Planner for the preparation of an IS/MND for this project, which involved the development of a downtown mixed-use, 4-story structure with 38 residential units, 16,175 SF of commercial, a public plaza, and a subterranean parking garage. The project site is one block south of the Metro Gold Line Station, allowing the project to support the City’s goal of developing a transit- oriented downtown community. The project required demolition of a surface parking lot and a building, which was evaluated for historic significance. EDUCATION 2014/MA/Environmental Studies/University of Southern California 2013/BM/Music, Harp Performance, Minor, Environmental Studies/ University of Southern California EXPERIENCE With Psomas for 6 years 461 51Statement of Qualiﬁ cations Long-Term Streambed Alteration Agreement for Annual Soft- Bottom Channel Maintenance Plan for Select Reaches IS/MND, Los Angeles County, CA: Project Manager for the preparation of an IS/ MND to support the issuance of a Section 1600 Long-term Streambed Alteration Agreement from the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW). The IS/MND analyzes the Los Angeles County FCD’s Programmatic Soft-Bottom Channel Maintenance Plan (Maintenance Plan). The Maintenance Plan would set forth allowable activities and protocols for the annual maintenance of soft-bottom channels (reaches) related vegetation and sediment removal at 18 reaches located throughout Los Angeles County and would ensure that the activities within the reaches would be implemented in an environmentally responsible manner, consistent with the requirements of the CDFW Section 1600 Agreement. Project Manager and Air Quality/GHG Analyst Hilton Garden Inn and Home2Suites Hotel, IS/MND, Anaheim, CA: Environmental Planner for the demolition of an existing two-story motel and construction of an eight-story, 210-room hotel and associated surface and structured parking. Park to Playa Trail Project IS/MND, Los Angeles, CA: Environmental Planner for reparation of the IS/MND for the Park to Playa Trail that would connect the parks and open spaces in the Baldwin Hills area to the Pacific Coast. The Park to Playa Trail would be an approximate seven-mile system of walking, hiking, and bicycle trails running east-southeast through the Baldwin Hills in parks and open space areas owned and operated by various State, County, and City agencies and located within the cities of Los Angeles and Culver City and within unincorporated County land. The IS/MND evaluated the potential environmental impacts of various improvements along existing and proposed trails in the Kenneth Hahn State Recreation Area, Baldwin Hills Scenic Overlook, Culver City Park, and along Stocker Street. University of California, Los Angeles Anderson School of Business Academic Building, Los Angeles, CA: Environmental Planner for this project, which involves the construction of a 4-level, approximately 62,000 GSF addition to the existing six building, approximately 305,000 GSF Anderson School of Management complex. The building addition will be constructed on top of existing Parking Structure 5, which will remain operational. Duarte Road and Baldwin Avenue Intersection Capacity Improvements, Arcadia, CA: Environmental Planner for the preparation for an IS/MND for the addition of a second left turn lane on eastbound Duarte Road, through widening the roadway by a net width of 10 feet, and right turn signal overlap timing adjustments to improve the intersection level of service (LOS). The City of Arcadia’s 2005 Transportation Master Plan (Plan) assessed the existing roadway and intersection operations present at that time. Based on a threshold for deficient intersections of worse than level of service (LOS) D, the Plan established a comprehensive set of transportation improvements at 20 intersections to address deficiencies that may occur by 2030. The Plan concluded that the intersection of Baldwin Avenue and Duarte Road is a major constriction to eff ective traff ic fl ow and requires improvements to enhance circulation and reduce congestion during peak hours. Daria Sarraf (Continued) 462 52Statement of Qualiﬁ cations Tin Cheung Air Quality, Climate Change, and Noise Manager Tin Cheung has 27 years of experience conducting air quality, climate change, noise, and vibration studies for CEQA and NEPA compliance. His experience includes preparing air pollutant emissions inventories, dispersion modeling, climate change, and health risk assessments (HRAs) using a variety of computer data models. He is also proficient in conducting noise and vibration studies for stationary and mobile sources. He has employed monitoring equipment for the measurement of noise, vibration, and particulate matter. Mr. Cheung’s project experience includes analyses of land uses, including large-scale infrastructure, residential, commercial, industrial, educational, energy, and recreational uses. He has extensive knowledge of the CEQA/NEPA regulatory process and impact assessment methods established by USEPA, the California Air Resources Board (CARB), and local air quality management districts. Tin has also performed third-party reviews for technical adequacy and CEQA compliance in support of legal eff orts and government quality assurance/quality control. Mr. Cheung’s substantial knowledge of impact quantification and regulations helps him find creative solutions to reduce air quality, climate change, health risk, energy, noise, and vibration impacts. Key projects include air quality and noise modeling for the Metropolitan Water District’s Bay Delta Conservation Plan, the BNSF Tehachapi Rail Corridor, the Los Angeles Airport Runway Safety Area, the National Football League Stadium in the City of Industry, and two segments of the High Speed Rail project. Experience The Queen of the Valley Hospital Specific Plan Program EIR, West Covina, CA: Air Quality and Noise Manager for a comprehensive EIR for a new master plan and Specific Plan for the Queen of the Valley Hospital in West Covina. The hospital proposed to expand its facilities in the coming years from 1.1 to 1.5 MSF of new buildings plus add two new parking structures to provide expanded and more eff icient medical services to the community. Psomas also prepared a number of technical studies including traff ic, air quality, greenhouse gas emissions, noise, and cultural resources, as well as retained KTGY to prepare and process the Specific Plan document. Major environmental issues included impacts on adjacent residences, apartments, and overall traff ic. Lincoln Bridge Multi-Modal Improvements (LA TOS 27), Los Angeles, CA: Air Quality and Noise Manager for the widening of Lincoln Boulevard from Fiji Way to Jeff erson Boulevard to provide capacity for future light rail transit, with three vehicle lanes in each direction, Class II bicycle lanes, and sidewalks on both sides of the bridge. The project includes replacement of the Lincoln Boulevard Bridge over Ballona Creek, and replacement of the Culver Boulevard overpass while minimizing impacts to the creek and wetlands. West Valley Feeder No. 1 Stage 3 Project IS/MND, Los Angeles, CA: Air Quality and Noise Manager for preparation of an IS/MND for the Metropolitan Water District’s (Metropolitan’s) West Valley Feeder No. 1 (WVF1) Stage 3 Project. The project site is located on approximately 0.46 acre within the north/northwestern portion of Chatsworth Park South where the San Fernando EDUCATION 1993/BA/Geography and Environmental Studies/ University of California, Santa Barbara PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS Association of Environmental Professionals EXPERIENCE With Psomas for 4 years; with other firms for 23 years 463 53Statement of Qualiﬁ cations Valley fl oor borders the adjacent Simi Hills/Santa Susana Mountains in the community of Chatsworth, in the City of Los Angeles, and the County of Los Angeles. Existing surrounding development is characterized by the Chatsworth Park South facility, single-family residences to the east, and undeveloped hillside terrain within the Santa Susana Pass State Historic Park. A railroad right-of-way is located north of the project site, and informal multi-use trails are located throughout the project site and serve pedestrian, bicycling, and equestrian uses. The purpose of the proposed project is to continue pipeline improvements implemented by Stages 1 and 2 of the WVF1 Valve Modification Project. The project would include 1) replacing valves, 2) adding valve structures, and 3) improving access for maintenance and repairs to WVF1. The work is proposed to be prioritized and divided into three stages over multiple shutdown seasons to minimize the duration of pipeline outages. Long-Term Streambed Alteration Agreement for Annual Soft- Bottom Channel Maintenance Plan for Select Reaches IS/MND, Los Angeles County, CA: Air Quality and Noise Manager for the preparation of an IS/MND to support the issuance of a Section 1600 Long-term Streambed Alteration Agreement from the CDFW. The IS/MND analyzes the Los Angeles County FCD’s Programmatic Soft-Bottom Channel Maintenance Plan (Maintenance Plan). The Maintenance Plan would set forth allowable activities and protocols for the annual maintenance of soft-bottom channels (reaches) related vegetation and sediment removal at 18 reaches located throughout Los Angeles County and would ensure that the activities within the reaches would be implemented in an environmentally responsible manner, consistent with the requirements of the CDFW Section 1600 Agreement. Inglewood Oil Field Specific Plan Project EIR, Culver City, CA: Air Quality and Noise Manager for the preparation of an EIR for a Specific Plan that sets forth safeguards and regulations on oil and gas extraction activities in Culver City. The project site is adjacent to the Newport-Inglewood Fault and contains an Alquist-Priolo Fault splay. Up to 30 new wells would be allowed as well as associated storage tanks and pipelines, with requirements and restrictions to ensure the health and safety of the surrounding residential, recreational, and commercial land uses. The Specific Plan allows for the possibility of well stimulation techniques, including fracking, and deep well injection. Tin conducted a quality assurance review of the air quality and climate change analysis, which included revisions needed to enhance legal defensibility of the CEQA document. He also revised the noise analysis to include updated information on drilling activities. Hilton Garden Inn and Home2Suites Hotel, IS/MND, Anaheim, CA: Air Quality and Noise Manager for the demolition of an existing two-story motel and construction of an eight-story, 210-room hotel and associated surface and structured parking. Tin evaluated the project’s construction and operational air quality and greenhouse gas on both a regional and local level. Tin also evaluated the project’s noise impacts and provided recommendation for mitigation. Annandale Canyon Open Space Trail Access Improvements Project, Pasadena, CA: Air Quality and Noise Manager for the preparation of an IS/MND for the Annandale Canyon Open Space Trail Access Improvements project. The project will provide an open space area with accessibility to the public. The City-owned site consists of approximately 23 acres of undeveloped land in Annandale Canyon at the western edge of the City. The project is composed of several improvements to the site, which include a new trailhead at the end of Wierfield Drive, a trail, and an observation point on a hilltop of the San Rafael Hills. Tin Cheung (Continued) 464 54Statement of Qualiﬁ cations Ann Johnston Resource Management Team Leader Ann Johnston is the Team Leader of Resource Management projects and a Principal of Psomas. She has 31 years of experience in biological resources inventories/evaluations; sensitive species surveys; mitigation monitoring; resource agency permitting and processing; conservation and strategic planning; and technical peer reviews. Ann’s professional experience has focused on finding solutions to development challenges where potential impacts to biological resources may occur, and on the assessment and integration of biological data (particularly on sensitive species) into environmental documentation that complies with the requirements of CEQA, NEPA, FESA, and CESA. Over the past 29 years, she has managed and/or authored the biological resources sections of numerous EIRs; EISs; Biological Technical Reports; Biological Assessments (pursuant to Section 7 consultations with the USFWS); Natural Environment Studies (NESs) (pursuant to Caltrans guidelines); focused surveys for sensitive species; tree reports; resource management plans; mitigation monitoring reports; and general biological assessments and constraints analyses. Experience Station Fire Project Biological Monitoring, Los Angeles County, CA: Principal-in-Charge/Project Manager for this project located along Angeles Crest Highway in the Angeles National Forest. The project was for the repair and removal of electricity lines in the 2009 Station Fire area; pre-construction surveys were required at each work site within 24 hours prior to commencement of repairs. Ann managed surveys. She was also a Biological Monitor and conducted a pre-construction survey at each pole site proposed for repair or removal and evaluated whether the surrounding habitat had potential to support special status plant or wildlife species and whether there were any nesting birds present. Oceanfront Estates Biological Documentation and Permitting, Rancho Palos Verdes, CA: Senior Project Manager for the Oceanfront Estates project in Rancho Palos Verdes. Sensitive resources evaluated include Pacific pocket mouse, Palos Verdes blue butterfl y, coastal California gnatcatcher, and riparian and coastal sage scrub habitats. She managed the biological resources evaluation for the project and processed the Interim Habitat Loss Permit documents pursuant to Section 4(d) of the FESA. Ann also documented the development of direct, indirect, and cumulative project impacts and corresponding mitigation measures, which include the restoration of coastal sage scrub vegetation. Tehachapi Renewable Transmission Project (TRTP) Biological Resources Support, Southern California, CA: Principal-in-Charge for this Southern California Edison project. The TRTP consists of the construction of several substations and a total of 175 miles of transmission lines running from the Antelope Valley through the Angeles National Forest (ANF) and into the City of Ontario. The project’s objective is to bring wind and solar sourced energy from the Tehachapi Mountains and western Antelope Valley to the Los Angeles basin. As part of a large, multi-company team, Psomas has provided a full range of biological services including vegetation mapping; focused surveys for plants, trees, birds, herpetofauna, and bats; nesting bird surveys; raptor surveys; EDUCATION 1989/BA/Biology/California State University, Long Beach PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS Women’s Transportation Seminar, Orange County Chapter IRWA Chapter 67 EXPERIENCE With Psomas for 24 years; with other firms for 7 years 465 55Statement of Qualiﬁ cations pre-construction surveys and construction monitoring; and seed collection. Ann is providing project management and senior support for the portion of the alignment that traverses the ANF. Her responsibilities include technical staff management for focused surveys and construction monitoring; reviews of avoidance and mitigation plans; and guidance on a multitude of other tasks. Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA), Baseline Biological Surveys for Acquired Properties, Orange County, CA: Principal-in-Charge/Project Manager for this project, which has allowed OCTA to establish a biological baseline of five acquired properties, with special attention on species covered under the draft OCTA National Community Conservation Plan (NCCP)/Habitat Conservation Plan (HCP). Surveys were conducted in a manner that allowed the greatest opportunity to document non-Covered Species and habitats that add value to a potential conservation area. The specific survey and documentation tasks undertaken to establish the biological baseline include literature review; general biological surveys and vegetation mapping; acquisition, restoration, and management criteria evaluation; special status plant surveys; special status wildlife surveys for coastal California gnatcatcher, coastal cactus wren, least Bell’s vireo, southwestern willow fl ycatcher, and special status bat species; a jurisdictional delineation and California Rapid Assessment Method (CRAM) evaluation; and Biological Technical Reports documenting the findings of all these surveys. Southern California Edison (SCE) Substation Projects Biological Services, Southern California, CA: Principal in Charge for numerous SCE substation projects. Some of the projects include the Circle City Substation Project in Riverside and San Bernardino Counties; the Falcon Ridge Substation Project in San Bernardino County; the Lakeview Substation Project in Riverside County; the Triton Substation Project in Riverside County; the Mascot Substation Project in Kings County; and the Presidential Substation Project in Ventura County. Ann oversaw jurisdictional delineations; vegetation mapping; general plant and wildlife surveys; focused surveys for numerous special status plant and wildlife species; and biological documentation of the survey results. Los Angeles International Airport Specific Plan and Tom Bradley International Terminal Reconfiguration Project Biological Surveys, Los Angeles, CA: Principal-in-Charge/Project Manager for this project, which was to complete various biological surveys and documentation to identify potential impacts to biological resources and provide guidance measures relative to previous environmental approvals for the project area. Ann managed the surveys; reviewed all documentation; and provided biological technical support for the jurisdictional permitting process. NorthLake Specific Plan and Golf Course Project, Biological Technical Report and Biological Resources Surveys, Los Angeles County, CA: Senior Project Manager for the approximate 2,115-acre NorthLake Specific Plan and Golf Course project, which proposes to build a single-family residential development and a golf course adjacent to Castaic Lake. Ann oversaw the biological resources surveys and managed the preparation of the Biological Technical Report for the project. The purpose of the various biological surveys and documentation was to identify potential impacts to biological resources and to provide mitigation measures. Issues analyzed for the project include impacts to the arroyo southwestern toad, red-legged frog, coastal California gnatcatcher, least Bell’s vireo, southwestern willow fl ycatcher, and special status plant species. Ann Johnston (Continued) 466 56Statement of Qualiﬁ cations EDUCATION 2005/MS/Biology/University of California, Riverside 1998/BS/Ecology and Evolution/University of California, Santa Barbara 1998/BS/Environmental Studies/University of California, Santa Barbara CERTIFICATIONS Principal Investigator for Psomas’ CDFW Entity Scientific Collecting Permit/SC-190240016/ California Department of Fish and Wildlife 10(a)(1)(A) Permit for coastal California gnatcatcher, southwestern willow flycatcher, and yellow- billed cuckoo/TE-148554- 5/U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS Urban Land Institute Orange County/Inland Empire Sea & Sage Audubon Society American Ornithological Society Southern California Botanists The Wildlife Society California Native Plant Society EXPERIENCE With Psomas for 22 years, with other firms for 2 years Amber Heredia Biologial Resources Manager Amber Heredia is a Senior Project Manager and Senior Biologist with 24 years of experience in the preparation of technical reports to meet the requirements of the FESA, CESA, CEQA, NEPA, and the CWA. She has worked throughout Southern California from Kern County to San Diego County with most of her work focused in Orange, Los Angeles, and Riverside counties. As Senior Project Manager, she has managed a variety of project types, including transportation, dam/reservoir, fl ood control, utility, and private development projects. Amber has a thorough knowledge of protocol survey methodologies for each listed species within the region and is well-versed in the requirements of various multiple species habitat conservation plans including the Orange County Central Coastal Natural Communities Conservation Plan NCCP/HCP and the Southern Subregion HCP in Orange County. Amber has experience preparing Biological Constraints Reports; Biological Resources sections for environmental documents; Biological Technical Reports; Focused Survey Reports; Habitat Assessments; Biological Assessments; Habitat Conservation Plans; Biological Resources Construction Plans; Mitigation and Monitoring Plans; Monitoring Reports; and Annual Reports. Experience Metropolitan Transportation Authority’s Regional Connector Transit Corridor Project, Various Pre-Construction Nesting Bird Surveys, Los Angeles, CA: Biological Resources Manager for several pre- construction nesting bird surveys related to this project. The project will construct a 1.9-mile light rail line that will extend services between the Gold Line Light Rail Transit lines from Pasadena and East Los Angeles to the Blue Line (to Long Beach) and to the new Expo Line to Culver City, with the provision of new tracks through downtown Los Angeles mainly within twin tunnels. Amber oversaw the nesting bird surveys prior to the removal of any trees; preparation of memos documenting survey results; and follow-up monitoring of active nests if required. Irvine Ranch Water District On-Call CEQA/NEPA Consultation Services, Irvine, CA: Senior Biologist for this on-call contract. Task orders under this on-call included the Irvine Lake Pipeline North Conversion Project which required an IS/MND for the conversion of the Irvine Lake Pipeline from a water pipeline to a recycled water pipeline and subsequent Mitigation Monitoring for the project. Amber conducted and oversaw a focused survey for the coastal California Gnatcatcher and was the primary author for the Biological Resources Report for the IS/MND. In addition, she oversaw the biological surveys for the implementation of the Irvine Lake Pipeline Conversion project. Tehachapi Renewable Transmission Project (TRTP) Biological Resources Support, Southern California, CA: Biologist for this Southern California Edison project. The TRTP consists of the construction of several substations and a total of 175 miles of transmission lines running from the Antelope Valley through the Angeles National Forest and into the City of Ontario. The project’s objective is to bring wind and solar sourced energy from the Tehachapi Mountains and western Antelope Valley to the Los Angeles basin. As part of a large, multi-company team, Psomas has provided a full range of biological services including vegetation mapping; focused surveys for plants, 467 57Statement of Qualiﬁ cations trees, birds, herpetofauna, and bats; nesting bird surveys; raptor surveys; pre-construction surveys and construction monitoring; and seed collection. Amber has assisted with focused surveys for spotted owl and special status herpetofauna species, including the arroyo toad, red-legged frog, mountain yellow-legged frog, western pond turtle, two-striped garter snake, and coast range newt. Amber also conducted pre-construction focused surveys for special status wildlife in the Palmdale portion of the alignment and completed surveys for western burrowing owl and San Diego woodrat. Sunset Debris Basin Project IS/MND, Los Angeles County, CA: Biological Resources Manager for the proposed modifications of this debris basin, which would raise the spillway height of the existing Sunset Upper Dam to add additional storage capacity to the Sunset Upper Debris Basin, thereby providing additional fl ood and debris protection to downstream properties and residents in the Sunset Canyon Watershed. Amber conducted focused surveys for the coastal California gnatcatcher and prepared a focused survey report to document the survey findings that was submitted to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. These survey findings were used to establish baseline conditions for a long-term agreement for maintenance of this basin. Amber prepared a Biological Constraints Report and the Biological Resources section of the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration for the dam upgrade project. Santa Anita Debris Basin Project Biological Services, Los Angeles County, CA: Project Manager for the Los Angeles County Department of Public Works’ Santa Anita Debris Basin project. Amber conducted focused surveys for the least Bell’s vireo and southwestern willow fl ycatcher in the Santa Anita Debris Basin, which is maintained by the Los Angeles County Department of Public Works. Amber prepared a focused survey report to document the survey findings and submitted it to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Park to Playa Trail Project IS/MND, Los Angeles, CA: Biological Resources Manager for reparation of the IS/MND for the Park to Playa Trail that would connect the parks and open spaces in the Baldwin Hills area to the Pacific Coast. The Park to Playa Trail would be an approximate seven-mile system of walking, hiking, and bicycle trails running east-southeast through the Baldwin Hills in parks and open space areas owned and operated by various State, County, and City agencies and located within the cities of Los Angeles and Culver City and within unincorporated County land. Amber oversaw biological survey eff orts including vegetation mapping, general plant and wildlife surveys, focused surveys for special status plants, and focused surveys for coastal California gnatcatcher. Amber also oversaw preparation of reports to document survey eff orts. Camp Kilpatrick Biological Resources Services, Los Angeles County, CA: Biological Resources Manager for the construction of a replacement juvenile residential treatment camp in Los Angeles County. To support the project’s IS/MND, Psomas completed vegetation mapping; general plant and wildlife surveys, including a jurisdictional delineation and report; bat habitat assessment; focused plant surveys; oak tree surveys; and bat roost emergence surveys. Amber oversaw biological surveys that included vegetation mapping, general plant and wildlife surveys, and focused surveys for special status plant species. Amber also oversaw preparation of a Biological Resources Report that evaluated project impacts on these resources, including potential impacts to a Significant Ecological Area and resources within the Coastal Zone, and a report documenting the results of focused plant surveys. Amber Heredia (Continued) 468 58Statement of Qualiﬁ cations Charles Cisneros, MS, RPA Senior Archaeologist Charles Cisneros is a registered professional archaeologist with 16 years of experience in archaeological assessment and field experience in California and Nevada. He has directed numerous field projects in support of compliance with CEQA, NEPA, and Sections 106 and 110 of the National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA). Charles has managed a wide range of projects involving archaeological survey, testing, data recovery, monitoring, and laboratory analysis. He is skilled at research and data management, as well as maintaining and organizing digital and print publications. His training and background meet the U.S. Secretary of the Interior’s Professional Qualifications Standards for prehistoric and historic archaeology and he is a California Energy Commission approved archaeologist for desert archaeology. Experience 2nd Street and Pacific Coast Highway Retail Center, Long Beach, CA: Senior Archaeologist for this 10-acre site development. This retail complex area features a mix of upscale lifestyle tenants, restaurants, entertainment, local shops and gourmet grocery. The scope of services for preliminary engineering for the project include engineering planning, entitlements, EIR engineering support, and ALTA survey mapping. The demolition of the existing Sea Marina Hotel will then be followed by the final engineering design that includes sewer, water, and storm drain improvements along with precise grading and erosion control plans. Psomas was also responsible for preparing the SWPPP and SUSMP report documents associated with ensuring that the storm water quality is in compliance with current Regional Water Quality Board Permit requirements. Psomas also provided off site improvements and coordination for Marina Drive revitalization, 2nd Street, and Pacific Coast Highway street widening, sidewalk, storm drain, driveway, striping, and traff ic signal improvements. Lincoln Bridge Multi-Modal Improvements (LA TOS 27), Los Angeles, CA: Senior Archaeologist for the widening of Lincoln Boulevard from Fiji Way to Jeff erson Boulevard to provide capacity for future light rail transit, with three vehicle lanes in each direction, Class II bicycle lanes, and sidewalks on both sides of the bridge. The project includes replacement of the Lincoln Boulevard Bridge over Ballona Creek, and replacement of the Culver Boulevard overpass while minimizing impacts to the creek and wetlands. Glendale-Hyperion Complex of Bridges Improvement Project, Los Angeles, CA: Senior Archaeologist for the Project Report (PR) and Plans, Specifications, and Estimate (PS&E) for rehabilitation of this complex of six bridges. Improvements include widening the Glendale Boulevard bridges; realigning the I-5 northbound off - and on-ramps and Los Angeles River bike path; adding a median barrier on the Hyperion Avenue Viaduct, designing retaining walls, traff ic signals, drainage system improvements, and infiltration basins; and improving pedestrian facilities including the Red Car pedestrian bridge and the Sunnynook pedestrian loop trail. The project involved EDUCATION 2008/MS/European Archaeology/University of Edinburgh, United Kingdom 2004/BA/Anthropology/ California State University, Los Angeles CERTIFICATIONS Orange County Certified Archaeologist/Orange County Registered Professional Archaeologist/28575983/ Register of Professional Archaeologists Riverside County Certified Archaeologist/Riverside County PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS Society for American Archaeology Western States Folklore Society EXPERIENCE With Psomas for 3 years; with other firms for 13 years 469 59Statement of Qualiﬁ cations coordination with various stakeholders and the use of various agency standards such as Caltrans, City of Los Angeles, FHWA, and AASHTO. Pacoima Reservoir Restoration Project EIR, Los Angeles, CA: Senior Archaeologist for preparation of an EIR for removal of approximately 3 million cubic yards of sediment from the reservoir to preserve the reliability of the operations and safety of the dam. Implementation of the proposed PRSR Project includes construction/rehabilitation and operation of an access road upstream of the Reservoir; dewatering the Reservoir; excavating and removing the sediment; assembling, operating, and partially disassembling the conveyor belt; staging and transporting the sediment to Lopez Spreading Grounds; and finally trucking the sediment for placement at Sunshine Canyon Landfill or Sun Valley Pits. Annandale Canyon Open Space Trail Access Improvements Project, Pasadena, CA: Senior Archaeologist for the preparation of an IS/MND for the Annandale Canyon Open Space Trail Access Improvements project. The project will provide an open space area with accessibility to the public. The City- owned site consists of approximately 23 acres of undeveloped land in Annandale Canyon at the western edge of the City. The project is composed of several improvements to the site, which include a new trailhead at the end of Wierfield Drive, a trail, and an observation point on a hilltop of the San Rafael Hills. McCanna Hills Addendum to an EIR, Riverside County, CA: Senior Archaeologist for preparation of an addendum to Environmental Impact Report (EIR) 319 previously prepared for the McCanna Ranch Specific Plan near Lake Perris in western Riverside County. TTM33978 consists of Planning Areas 1 and 2A of the specific plan. The addendum incorporated a number of updated technical studies and current data about the nearby Mid-County Parkway. Major issues included traff ic impacts expressed by the City of Perris to the west. Perris Circle Industrial Building 3 Project, IS/MND, Perris, CA: Senior Archaeologist to support the IS/MND for this project, that tiesr from the Perris Valley Commerce Center (PVCC) Specific Plan EIR. The proposed project involves construction and operation of a 210,900 sf industrial warehouse with associated off ice uses and outdoor employee recreational spaces on an approximately 9.9-acre site. Responsible for preparation of the Phase I Cultural Resources Inventory and Paleontological Resource Inventory. Charles conducted Native American outreach activities to supplement the coordination conducted by the City. Colton Community Soccer Park Project IS/MND, Colton, CA: Senior Archaeologist for an IS/MND and an MMRP for the City’s proposed community soccer park. The community park will include eight lighted soccer fields that can host soccer tournaments as well as provide local teams with practice facilities. The proposed project will be constructed and operated on a 21-acre portion of the 45-acre site with the remaining 24 acres retained as natural open space along the Santa Ana River. Infrastructure improvements include paved parking; restroom and concession buildings; a police sub-station; breezeways with seating; child play areas; multipurpose trails; shaded spectator seating, and a maintenance yard with a cellphone tower. Major environmental issues addressed in the IS/MND include potential impacts to the river and associated biological resources and the presence of a former landfill beneath the property. Charles provided oversight and QA/QC for Psomas’ archaeological and historic research at the CHRIS Information Center, archaeological survey, and cultural report. Charles Cisneros, MS, RPA (Continued) 470 60Statement of Qualiﬁ cations Alejandro Angel, PhD, PE, PTOE, ENV SP Traffic Engineering Manager Alejandro Angel has extensive experience in complex traff ic engineering projects and is highly proficient in the use of demand forecasting and traff ic simulation tools. Alejandro has overseen and prepared traff ic/transportation studies pursuant to CEQA/NEPA in Southern California. He has led the preparation of numerous studies and been in charge of developing engineering standards for various jurisdictions. Experience Queen of the Valley Hospital Specific Plan and EIR, West Covina, CA: Transportation/Traff ic Manager for the development of a traff ic study in support of an EIR for a Specific Plan for the Queen of the Valley Hospital campus. The Hospital is planning for facility improvements as well as the construction of new facilities; Psomas is also responsible for the preparation of a parking study for the site. The traff ic analysis will include a comparison of expected conditions to those in the City’s General Plan. Huntington Plaza Mixed-Use Project, Arcadia, CA: Traff ic Manager for the preparation of an Initial Study/MND. The project site includes 2.1 acres located adjacent to the Metro’s Gold Line Railroad which is fully developed with urban land uses. The project would develop 170 residential units, 2,290 SF of clubhouse, 12,600 SF of ground-level retail land uses, and one level of subterranean parking. The project includes five levels of above ground development with a pedestrian access bridge over the east-west alley to connect the two building areas. The property is located within the central portion of the City that is covered by the Downtown Parking Overlay and is located within both the Downtown Mixed Use zone and the Central Business District zone with the Downtown Overlay. All buildings and surface parking that would be removed as part of the project. The project site is within a SCAG designated High-Quality Transit Areas and within a Transit Priority Area for the 2016 Regional Transportation Plan and Sustainable Communities Strategy. 2018 Education and Facilities Master Plan EIR, City of Walnut, CA: Transportation Manager for preparation of the Traff ic Impact Analysis for this project, which involves preparation of an EIR for the Mt. San Antonio College 2018 Education and Facilities Master Plan, and associated 2017 Parking and Circulation Master Plan (EFMP/PCMP). The EIR is addressing the EFMP/PCMP at a program-level and will also provide project-level analysis for select elements of the EFMP/PCMP, including the construction of parking structures at existing Lots R and S (Parking Structures R and S) and the Student Center. Earvin Magic Johnson Park CEQA Addendum and Traffic Study, Los Angeles County, CA: Traff ic Engineering Manager environmental permitting and planning for the development of an existing County park and the redevelopment of adjacent sites, covering a total area of over 100 acres in the County of Los Angeles. In addition to the traditional park amenities, the site will include a major cultural complex which will include an art museum, music center, and nature lab. Oversaw the preparation of the traff ic evaluation memorandum for this project, which was developed as an addendum to a REGISTRATION 2003/AZ/Professional Engineer/Civil/40203 2008/CA/Professional Engineer/Civil/72792 2016/UT/Professional Engineer/9731937-2202 EDUCATION 2008/PhD/Civil Engineering (Transportation)/University of Arizona 2002/MS/Civil Engineering (Transportation)/University of Arizona 1999/BS/Civil Engineering/ Universidad EAFIT, Colombia CERTIFICATIONS Envision Sustainability Professional/Institute for Sustainable Infrastructure Professional Traffic Operations Engineer/ Transportation Professional Certification Board Inc. PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS Institute of Transportation Engineers EXPERIENCE With Psomas for 18 years; with other firms for 3 years 471 61Statement of Qualiﬁ cations previously prepared traff ic impact analysis report. The traff ic memorandum included an evaluation of trip generation and distribution for the updated project master plan, a comparison to project traff ic volumes in the previous study, and operational analyses for several County and City of Los Angeles intersections in the project area. The project also required significant coordination with multiple County departments as well as the City, and the evaluation of multiple project alternatives throughout the process. Carson Park Master Plan, Carson Redevelopment Agency, Carson, CA: Traff ic Engineer for renovation design of Carson Park, the City of Carson’s central community park. Carson Park is an existing 11-acre, fl ag-shaped park site located on Main Street in the City of Carson. The $5 million renovation will include a new state-of-the art gymnasium building, which will also house a large activity room, dance room, computer room and workout facility. Psomas is working closely with the landscape architect to reconfigure the existing baseball fields and add soccer fields. Also included in the park design will be new outdoor basketball courts, an amphitheater, a children’s splash pad area, a serene garden area, and various passive trails and picnic opportunities. Prepared a traff ic impact study for the addition of a new 20,000-SF recreation center to Carson Park. Access to the park and the configuration of the parking areas were modified to improve circulation, and to allow shared use of the parking lot with Carson Street Elementary School, located just south of the new recreation center. Loker Medical Arts Pavilion Traffic Study, Los Angeles, CA: Project Manager for a traff ic study for the construction of a 65,000 SF medical off ice building adjacent to the California Medical Center. The report analyzed traff ic impacts to more than 10 intersections in downtown Los Angeles, including several ramps on and off I-10 and I-110. The Critical Movement Analysis method was used to evaluate the need for mitigation at the study intersections. Signal Modification for Highway 1 in Laguna Beach, Laguna Beach, CA: Traff ic Engineering Manager that provided quality control and design advice for this project. This project consisted of signal design modifications to South Coast Highway (State Route 1) in Laguna Beach. The intersections included in the project were Saint Anns Drive, Anita Street, Oak Street, Brooks Street, and Mountain Road. St. Jude Medical Center Northwest Tower, Fullerton, CA: Traff ic Engineer for design of the Northwest Tower Addition, as part of the second phase of the St. Jude Medical Center Master Plan. The project includes a four- level, 200,000 SF addition, supporting central plant and 210-space parking structure expansion. The project team’s Integrated Project Delivery (IPD) method includes the combination of BIM and Psomas’ proprietary web-based project management software, ProjectWeb. Psomas’ tasks have included the following services: planning and entitlement support; schematic, design development and precise grading, drainage, paving and utility plans; sewer, water and storm drain plans; H&H studies; horizontal control plans; erosion control plans; topographic, field and boundary surveys; construction quantities and cost estimates; NPDES permit and Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP); Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP); construction administration and bidding support; and BIM Civil Design and Survey Scanning. Alejandro designed the addition of a right-turn lane, widening of existing travel lanes on Bastanchury Road, traff ic signal modifications, street lighting relocations, and the development of associated signing and pavement markings plans. Alejandro Angel, PhD, PE, PTOE, ENV SP (Continued) 472 62Statement of Qualiﬁ cations Darlene Danehy Yellowhair PE, TE, PTOE, RSP, ENV SP Transportion Engineer Darlene Danehy is a Registered Professional Engineer in Arizona (civil) and California (traff ic) and is a certified Professional Traff ic Operations Engineer (PTOE). She has extensive experience with a variety of traff ic engineering projects, including traff ic impact studies, traff ic reports, safety studies, signal warrant studies, corridor studies, signal timing and coordination, signing and striping design, and traff ic signal design. Darlene has also prepared and overseen numerous traff ic studies pursuant to CEQA and NEPA in southern California for both public and private projects. She also has experience with design and studies for alternate modes of travel, Road Safety Assessments, transportation planning, and roadway design. Darlene is well-versed in Synchro, SimTraff ic, HCS, SIDRA, and GIS, and has experience with AutoCAD, MicroStation, and InRoads. Experience Queen of the Valley Hospital Speciﬁ c Plan and EIR, West Covina, CA: Traff ic Engineer responsible for the development of a traff ic study in support of an EIR for a Specific Plan for the Queen of the Valley Hospital campus. The Hospital is planning for facility improvements as well as the construction of new facilities; Psomas is also responsible for the preparation of a parking study for the site. The traff ic analysis will include a comparison of expected conditions to those in the City’s General Plan. EIR for the Educational Facilities Master Plan and Parking and Circulation Master Plan (PCMP), Walnut, CA: Traff ic Engineer responsible for a traff ic study in support of the EIR for the EFMP and PCMP for Mt. San Antonio College. Both master plans were recently completed, and the College determined a single EIR to cover the improvements in both would be most eff icient. The traff ic study includes 27 intersections in five jurisdictions, as well as six Caltrans ramp intersections, and will include changes in traff ic distribution on campus due to anticipated parking structure construction. Earvin “Magic” Johnson Revised Park Master Plan Addendum to the Certified EIR, Los Angeles, CA: Traff ic Engineer for this project, which consists of environmental permitting and planning for the development of an existing County park and the redevelopment of adjacent sites, covering a total area of over 100 acres in the County of Los Angeles. In addition to the traditional park amenities, the site will include a major cultural complex which will include an art museum, music center, and nature lab. Darlene was responsible for the traff ic evaluation Memorandum for this project, which was developed as an addendum to a previously prepared traff ic impact analysis report. The traff ic Memorandum included an evaluation of trip generation and distribution for the updated project master plan, a comparison to project traff ic volumes in the previous study, and operational analyses for several County and City of Los Angeles intersections in the project area. The project also required significant coordination with multiple County departments as well as the City, and the evaluation of multiple project alternatives throughout the process. REGISTRATION 2009/AZ/Professional Engineer/Civil/50215 2017/CA/Traffic Engineer/2827 EDUCATION 2006/MS/Civil Engineering/ Cornell University 2004/BS/Civil Engineering/ University of Arizona CERTIFICATIONS Road Safety Professional/ Transportation Professional Certification Board Inc. Envision Sustainability Professional/Institute for Sustainable Infrastructure Professional Traffic Operations Engineer/ Transportation Professional Certification Board Inc. LEED Accredited Professional/U.S. Green Building Council PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS Institute of Transportation Engineers American Society of Civil Engineers EXPERIENCE With Psomas for 14 years 473 63Statement of Qualiﬁ cations Cohen Property Specific Plan IS/MND, Orange, CA: Transportation Engineer for the preparation of an IS/MND for a residential project that involves demolition of the existing shopping center and associated parking areas and site improvements and construction of 32 single-family detached, two-story dwelling units; internal drive aisles; and common open space areas on the 2.9-acre site. The project would provide 6,020 SF of common space and 2,667 SF of allowable private open space for a total of 8,667 SF of usable open space. Huntington Plaza Mixed-Use Project, Arcadia, CA: Traff ic Engineer for the preparation of an Initial Study/MND. The project site includes 2.1 acres located adjacent to the Metro’s Gold Line Railroad which is fully developed with urban land uses. The project would develop 170 residential units, 2,290 SF of clubhouse, 12,600 SF of ground-level retail land uses, and one level of subterranean parking. The project includes five levels of above ground development with a pedestrian access bridge over the east-west alley to connect the two building areas. The property is located within the central portion of the City that is covered by the Downtown Parking Overlay and is located within both the Downtown Mixed Use zone and the Central Business District zone with the Downtown Overlay. All buildings and surface parking that would be removed as part of the project. The project site is within a SCAG designated High-Quality Transit Areas and within a Transit Priority Area for the 2016 Regional Transportation Plan and Sustainable Communities Strategy. Colton Community Soccer Park IS/MND, Colton, CA: Traff ic engineer for this project, which consists of environmental planning for the development of a new community soccer park/complex. The proposed complex will fill a need in the City, providing eight lighted soccer fields on approximately 58 acres of City-owned land. The complex will also include parking, restroom facilities, a concession building, children’s play area, multipurpose trails, and spectator seating. Darlene was responsible for the traff ic impact study which included an evaluation of potential traff ic impacts due to the project in the anticipated opening year of 2021 and in the long term analysis year of 2041. The traff ic analysis was also incorporated into the IS/MND for CEQA compliance. University of California, Riverside (UCR) Student Success Center IS/MND, Riverside, CA: Traff ic engineer for this project, which consists of environmental planning for the construction of a Student Success Center (SSC) on the UCR campus. The SSC is a new 3- to 4- story facility which will support the UCR academic mission by providing general assignment classrooms and student life support spaces in the academic core of campus. Darlene was responsible for the traff ic evaluation memorandum for this project, coordination with the City of Riverside, and support for the IS/MND. Merrill Avenue Brownstones IS/MND, City of Riverside, CA: Traff ic Engineer assisting with the preparation of the Traff ic Impact Analysis to support the IS/MND for this project, which involves 108 dwelling units and associated amenities, and 1,200 SF of retail space. The report was prepared in compliance with the City of Riverside’s guidelines for the preparation of Traff ic reports. Inglewood Oil Field Specific Plan Project EIR, Culver City, CA: Traff ic Engineer for the preparation of an EIR for a Specific Plan that sets forth safeguards and regulations on oil and gas extraction activities in Culver City. The project site is adjacent to the Newport-Inglewood Fault and contains an Alquist- Priolo Fault splay. Up to 30 new wells would be allowed as well as associated storage tanks and pipelines, with requirements and restrictions to ensure the health and safety of the surrounding residential, recreational, and commercial land uses. Darlene Danehy Yellowhair, PE, PTOE, RSP, ENV SP (Continued) 474 64Statement of Qualiﬁ cations REGISTRATION 1975/CA/Professional Engineer/Civil/25737 EDUCATION 1970/BS/Civil Engineering/ University of California, Davis PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS Association of California Water Agencies Orange County Water Association EXPERIENCE With Psomas for 18 years; with other firms for 27 years Michael Swan, PE Water Supply Assessment Mike Swan has 45 years of experience in project engineering and management of diverse public works and public finance projects throughout Southern California. He has extensive experience in water resources master planning and design, as well as the development and implementation of financing for these and other public works projects. Experience Hydraulic Analysis and Water Supply Assessment, Brea 265 Specific Plan, Brea, CA: Project Manager for water and wastewater technical studies and a Water Supply Assessment (WSA) currently being prepared in support of an EIR for the proposed Brea 265 residential development in the City of Brea consisting of approximately 1,100 dwelling units on 265 acres. The City’s ability to meet the estimated project water demands now and into the future is being analyzed along with the capacity of the City’s existing water and sewer facilities to serve the proposed development. The project’s potential impact on the existing wet utilities is being evaluated based on hydraulic modeling of the existing system including estimated project fl ows. The project has been added to the City’s water system model to evaluate various scenarios including peak hour and fire fl ow conditions. A sewer model was also developed for the City’s sewer pipelines tributary to the project area and was calibrated to sewer fl ow monitoring conducted as part of the analysis. The hydraulic models will be utilized to evaluate capacity and recommend any needed improvements. Beach Boulevard Corridor Specific Plan and EIR, Anaheim, CA: Project Manager for the preparation of a WSA to support the preparation of a specific plan and EIR for a 283-acre corridor along Beach Boulevard to include mixed use development of 1,447 dwelling units, 1.28 million square feet of commercial 879 hotel rooms and a 557-bed hospital. This project was prepared as a subconsultant to an environmental firm to support their contract with the City of Anaheim. Disneyland Potable Water System Study, Anaheim, CA: Project Manager for development of a hydraulic model of the Disneyland Park potable water distribution system. This InfoWater model was developed to evaluate the capacity of the system to meet demands for both existing conditions and future conditions including the new Star Wars attraction. Average and peak water use was developed based on infl ow data through three service connections to the City of Anaheim water system, a water utility fixture inventory utilizing a Psomas developed ESRI application for field collection and ArcGIS online, and discussion with Resort staff on non-domestic uses including washdown, irrigation, and makeup water to attractions and equipment. The model was calibrated to hydrant fl ow tests performed throughout the park and SCADA data at the three water service connections. Priority improvements were identified to provide increased fl ow capacity to move water between all three connections and improve water pressure within the Park. Yorba Linda Water District, Sewer Master Plan Update, Yorba Linda, CA: Project Manager for the analysis of hydraulic model results for existing and build-out conditions, and development of the CIP to correct existing system capacity deficiencies as well as provide service to future 475 65Statement of Qualiﬁ cations development of the District through 2030. Prepared the Sewer Master Plan report which documents the entire project work eff ort, including a sewer GIS audit, extensive fl ow monitoring, and model development and calibration for the entire sewer collection system of approximately 161 miles of pipe. Development and fl ow projections for future land use conditions were created, including incorporation of some existing septic system areas into the collection system. Maywood Sewer Modeling, City of Maywood, CA: Project Manager for preparation of a hydraulic model of the City’s entire sewer collection system consisting of approximately 21.5 miles of 8- to 15-inch sewer lines. The City was under a mandate by the State Water Board to complete this sewer model in order to check sewer line capacity due to sewer spills that had occurred within their system. A model in InfoSewer was quickly prepared using the City’s existing GIS. Water Master Plan and Financial Plan Update, Huntington Beach, CA: Project Manager for the City’s 2012 Water Master Plan and Financial Plan update. The water master plan portion included update of the hydraulic model to include extended period simulation analyses based on real- time SCADA information, update of projected future demands and peaking data, analysis of supply reliability, and development of a CIP including cost estimates. A financial plan was then prepared including review of existing capacity charges, reserve fund requirements, rates and recommended adjustments, as appropriate. Prepared a 2016 Update of this Water Master Plan and coordinated with City staff and their financial consultant in updating the Financial Plan, including recommendations for increased water rates and developer fees. 2016 Water Master Plan Update, City of La Habra, CA: Project Manager for preparation of a water master plan update for the City including updating the existing H2ONET hydraulic model to refl ect the addition of a major new source of supply from Cal Domestic Water Company and a large booster station, supplying water from this groundwater source as well as the addition of another new well and other minor pipeline replacement projects. Water demands were also updated and, finally, the proposed Foothill Zone consolidation was included in the future scenario of the model along with future demand estimates. A recommended CIP was developed and utilized to update the City’s financial model refl ecting capital, operational, and debt repayment cost estimates, and projected revenues from rates. A complete master plan report was then developed documenting the entire work eff ort. And finally, Mr. Swan assisted with the presentation of the master plan to the City Council. Hydraulic Model Update, City of Buena Park, CA: Project Manager for update of the City’s water model from their 2005 Water Master Plan as a part of Psomas’ selection by the City as on-call water engineer. Authored a series of Technical Memoranda to update 2005 Water Master Plan recommendations. One new recommendation from Psomas’ model update was the consolidation of an upper pressure zone with the major Zone 1, which allows this zone to receive groundwater directly from the Zone 1 well system, expanding the ability of the City to supply less expensive groundwater and also reducing pumping costs. First Revision to Master Plan of Sanitary Sewers, Anaheim, CA: Project Manager for this major revision to the sewer master plan for the central portion of the City; a substantial number of sewer capital improvements had been constructed since the previous master plan. Work eff orts included major revisions/upgrades to the City’s sewer GIS, fl ow monitoring, hydraulic modeling, model calibration, and development of recommended capital improvements. Michael Swan, PE (Continued) 476 66Statement of Qualiﬁ cations REGISTRATION 1996/CA/Professional Engineer/Civil/55639 EDUCATION 1993/BS/Civil Engineering/ University of California, Irvine CERTIFICATIONS Envision Sustainability Professional/Institute for Sustainable Infrastructure Qualified SWPPP Developer/Stormwater Multiple Application and Report Tracking System/00904 Qualified SWPPP Practitioner/Stormwater Multiple Application and Report Tracking System/00904 EXPERIENCE With Psomas for 23 years; with other firms for 4 years Matt Heideman, PE, QSD/QSP, ENV SP Senior Civil Engineer Matt Heideman has 27 years of experience in all aspects of land development engineering. He has worked on residential, commercial, and industrial projects throughout Southern California, and has managed the design of mass grading, precise grading, storm drain, sewer, water, reclaimed water, widening of existing streets and highways, new street improvements, parking lots, street lighting, retaining walls, box culverts and vesting tentative tract maps for projects ranging from 10 acres to over 1,000. Matt specializes in large residential, commercial, or industrial master plan developments. This background aff ords him keen insight into the entire land development process -- from infrastructure and improvements of existing facilities to site development. Experience Newport Village Mixed-Use Project EIR, Newport Beach, CA: Senior Civil Engineer for the project, which involves demolishing existing structures and redeveloping the project site as a mixed-use development encompassing approximately 9.4 acres on the north and south sides of the West Coast Highway within the City of Newport Beach’s Mariners’ Mile corridor. The project consists of 14 residential condominium units on the South Parcel and 108 apartment units on the North Parcel and 128,640 SF of nonresidential fl oor area (i.e., 96,905 SF of existing and new off ice, 19,820 SF of boat and vehicle sales, and 11,915 SF of existing and new retail/food service uses). The project also includes a new publicly accessible waterfront promenade and 827 surface, structured, and subterranean parking spaces. St. Jude Medical Center Medical Office Building (MOB) 2 and Parking Structure 2, Fullerton, CA: Project Engineer for Psomas’ contract to provide civil engineering and surveying services for design of the new MOB 2 and Parking Structure (PS) 2 on the St. Jude Medical Center campus in Fullerton. Psomas’ tasks have included providing planning and entitlement support; schematic, design development and precise grading, drainage, paving and utility plans; sewer, water and storm drain plans; SWPPP; hydrology and hydraulic studies; horizontal control plans; erosion control plans; topographic field and boundary surveys; construction quantities and cost estimates; NPDES permit and Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan; Water Quality Management Plan; and construction administration and bidding support. Newhall Ranch Portero Village, Santa Clarita, CA: Project Manager for this mixed-use village on the Newhall Ranch property in Santa Clarita. Psomas performed engineering and planning and entitlement services for the Potrero development. The project was to include 4,385 residential units, approximately one MSF of commercial development, a school to service the future residents, Fire station,nature preserve and several parks for recreation. Psomas managed design and preparation of the Vesting Tentative Tract Map, grading, drainage and water quality, site infrastructure, utilities, bank protection and streambed stabilization and EIR support for this 2,500-acre hillside residential and mixed use commercial development, ranging from custom lots to multifamily homes within the last phase of the Ranch. 477 67Statement of Qualiﬁ cations Mission Village, Newhall Ranch Planning Support, Newhall, CA: Project Manager for the design and preparation of the Vesting Tentative Tract Map, Drainage and Water Quality Concept and EIR support for a 1,250-acre hillside residential and mixed use commercial development within the Ranch adjacent to the Magic Mountain Theme Park. The development comprises 5,300 dwelling units, including a 5-story residential urban village and live/ work units, and 1.3 MSF of commercial, off ice, and retail space. Included master plan designs of utilities, major highways, drainage and water quality concepts for a 2,000-acre watershed with three creeks running through the project and management of 27 million cubic yards of dirt removal. Lake Forest Sports Park, Lake Forest, CA: Project Manager for grading and drainage studies of the proposed sports park. The studies were performed in order to prepare the boundary for the proposed park and assist in developing the park site plan. Legal exhibits and descriptions were prepared showing the park boundary and the environmentally protected areas (County parcels) that would be swapped between the City of Lake Forest and County of Orange. Services included defining the City parcels that would be swapped with the County. Psomas’ tasks have included designing improvements per the City of Lake Forest and Irvine Ranch Water District (IRWD) design criteria, plan preparation, processing, advertisement and bidding. Psomas’ services for the park design included developing the preliminary alignment and profile of Rancho Parkway, onsite road alignment, public water system design, storm drain design, water quality design, coordination with all utility purveyors and coordinating landscape improvements. Final design included providing schematic, design development and precise grading, drainage, paving and utility plans; sewer, water and storm drain plans; hydrology and hydraulic studies; horizontal control plans; erosion control plans; topographic field and boundary surveys; construction quantities and cost estimates; NPDES permit and SWPPP; Water Quality Management Plan, and construction administration and bidding support. Spectrum 5 Retail Center, Irvine, CA: Project Manager for precise grading and paving plans and storm drain, sewer, and water improvement plans as well as construction support for this 12-acre retail center consisting of two warehouse furniture stores, a restaurant strip building, Del Taco, Chevron, and McDonalds. Managed design and processing through the City of Irvine and IRWD. Santa Ana River Animal Control Repair-Phase 2, Orange County, CA: Project Manager for assisting Orange County Public Works in bringing the Santa Ana River levee system into compliance with USACE Levee maintenance guidelines. Geotechnical investigations adjacent to Talbert Marsh, an ecologically sensitive area, were needed to determine the extent of rodent burrow damage and to determine the best construction scenario to repair the damage and bring the levees into compliance. A biological survey and report was prepared to guide the investigations. Biological monitoring was undertaken during the investigation to ensure that no impacts to Talbert Marsh occurred in compliance with a Coastal Zone waiver for the project. Lake Forest City Hall Preliminary Grading and Drainage Studies, Lake Forest, CA: Project Manager for grading and drainage studies of the proposed City Hall site. The studies were performed in order to determine the boundary for the proposed site and assist in developing the site plan with the City, water district and developer. Exhibits were prepared showing the site boundary and the impacts of the proposed grading to the adjacent Serrano Creek. Matt Heideman, PE, QSD/QSP, ENV SP (Continued) 478 5 Hutton Centre Drive Suite 300 Santa Ana, CA 92707 714.751.7373 Phone 714.545.8883 Fax www.Psomas.com 479 ATTACHMENT 2 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF MOORPARK AND PSOMAS FOR ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANT SERVICES THIS AGREEMENT, made and effective as of this _____ day of ________________________, 2021, between the City of Moorpark, a municipal corporation (“City”) and PSOMAS, a corporation (“Consultant”). In consideration of the mutual covenants and conditions set forth herein, the parties agree as follows: WHEREAS, City has the need for environmental consulting services; and WHEREAS, Consultant specializes in providing such services and has the proper work experience, certifications, and background to carry out the duties involved; and WHEREAS, Consultant has submitted to City a Proposal dated December 11, 2020, which is attached hereto as Exhibit C. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants, benefits, and premises herein stated, the parties hereto agree as follows: 1.TERM The term of this Agreement shall be from the date of execution to completion of the work, unless this Agreement is terminated or suspended pursuant to this Agreement. 2.SCOPE OF SERVICES City does hereby retain Consultant, as an independent contractor, in a contractual capacity to provide environmental consulting services, as set forth in Exhibit C.In the event there is a conflict between the provisions of Exhibit C and this Agreement, the language contained in this Agreement shall take precedence. Consultant shall perform the tasks described and set forth in Exhibit C. Consultant shall complete the tasks according to the schedule of performance which is also set forth in Exhibit C. Compensation for the services to be performed by Consultant shall be in accordance with Exhibit C. Compensation shall not exceed the rates or total contract value two hundred nineteen thousand eight hundred sixty-nine dollars ($219,869) as stated in Exhibit C, without a written Amendment to the Agreement executed by both parties. Payment by City to Consultant shall be in accordance with the provisions of this Agreement. 480 PSOMAS Page 2 of 15 3. PERFORMANCE Consultant shall at all times faithfully, competently and to the best of their ability, experience, standard of care, and talent, perform all tasks described herein. Consultant shall employ, at a minimum, generally accepted standards and practices utilized by persons engaged in providing similar services as are required of Consultant hereunder in meeting its obligations under this Agreement. 4. MANAGEMENT The individual directly responsible for Consultant’s overall performance of the Agreement provisions herein above set forth and to serve as principal liaison between City and Consultant shall be Glenn LaJoie, and no other individual may be substituted without the prior written approval of the City Manager. The City’s contact person in charge of administration of this Agreement, and to serve as principal liaison between Consultant and City, shall be the City Manager or the City Manager’s designee. 5. PAYMENT Taxpayer ID or Social Security numbers must be provided by Consultant on an IRS W -9 form before payments may be made by City to Consultant. The City agrees to pay Consultant monthly, in accordance with the payment rates and terms and the schedule of payment as set forth in Exhibit C, based upon actual time spent on the above tasks. This amount shall not exceed two hundred nineteen thousand eight hundred sixty-nine dollars ($219,869) for the total term of the Agreement unless additional payment is approved as provided in this Agreement. Consultant shall not be compensated for any services rendered in connection with its performance of this Agreement, which are in addition to those set forth herein, unless such additional services and compensation are authorized, in advance, in a written amendment to this Agreement executed by both parties. The City Manager, if authorized by City Council, may approve additional work not to exceed ten percent (10%) of the amount of the Agreement. Consultant shall submit invoices monthly for actual services performed. Invoices shall be submitted on or about the first business day of each month, or as soon thereafter as practical, for services provided in the previous month. Payment shall be made within thirty (30) days of receipt of each invoice as to all non-disputed fees. Any expense or reimbursable cost appearing on any invoice shall be accompanied by a receipt or other documentation subject to approval of the City Manager or the City Manager’s designee. If the City disputes any of Consultant’s fees or expenses, City shall give written notice to Consultant within thirty (30) days of receipt of any disputed fees set forth on the invoice. 481 PSOMAS Page 3 of 15 6. TERMINATION OR SUSPENSION WITHOUT CAUSE The City may at any time, for any reason, with or without cause, suspend, or terminate this Agreement, or any portion hereof, by serving upon the Consultant at least ten (10) days prior written notice. Upon receipt of said notice, the Consultant shall immediately cease all work under this Agreement, unless the notice provides otherwise. If the City suspends or terminates a portion of this Agreement, such suspension or termination shall not make void or invalidate the remainder of this Agreement. The Consultant may terminate this Agreement only by providing City with written notice no less than thirty (30) days in advance of such termination. In the event this Agreement is terminated or suspended pursuant to this Section, the City shall pay to Consultant the actual value of the work performed up to the time of termination or suspension. Upon termination or suspension of the Agreement pursuant to this Section, the Consultant will submit an invoice to the City pursuant to this Agreement. 7. DEFAULT OF CONSULTANT The Consultant’s failure to comply with the provisions of this Agreement shall constitute a default. In the event that Consultant is in default for cause under the terms of this Agreement, City shall have no obligation or duty to continue compensating Consultant for any work performed after the date of default and can terminate or suspend this Agreement immediately by written notice to the Consultant. If such failure by the Consultant to make progress in the performance of work hereunder arises out of causes beyond the Consultant’s control, and without fault or negligence of the Consultant, it shall not be considered a default. If the City Manager or his/her designee determines that the Consultant is in default in the performance of any of the terms or conditions of this Agreement, he/she shall cause to be served upon the Consultant a written notice of the default. The Consultant shall have thirty (30) days after service upon it of said notice in which to cure the default by rendering a satisfactory performance. In the event that the Consultant fails to cure its default within such period of time, the City shall have the right, notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, to terminate this Agreement without further notice and without prejudice to any other remedy to which it may be entitled at law, in equity or under this Agreement. 8. LIQUIDATED DAMAGES There are no liquidated damages under this Agreement. 9. OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTS Consultant shall maintain complete and accurate records with respect to sales, costs, expenses, receipts, and other such information required by City that relate to the performance of services under this Agreement. Consultant shall maintain adequate 482 PSOMAS Page 4 of 15 records of services provided in sufficient detail to permit an evaluation of services. All such records shall be maintained in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and shall be clearly identified and readily accessible. Consultant shall provide free access to the representatives of City or the City’s designees at reasonable times to such books and records; shall give the City the right to examine and audit said books and records; shall permit City to make transcripts therefrom as necessary; and shall allow inspection of all work, data, documents, proceedings, and activities related to this Agreement. Notification of audit shall be provided at least thirty (30) days before any such audit is conducted. Such records, together with supporting documents, shall be maintained for a period of three (3) years after receipt of final payment. Upon completion of, or in the event of termination or suspension without cause of this Agreement, all original documents, designs, drawings, maps, models, computer files, surveys, notes, and other documents prepared in the course of providing the services to be performed pursuant to this Agreement shall become the sole property of the City and may be used, reused, or otherwise disposed of by the City without the permission of the Consultant. With respect to computer files, Consultant shall make available to the City, at the Consultant’s office and upon reasonable written request by the City, the necessary computer software and hardware for purposes of accessing, compiling, transferring, and printing computer files. 10. INDEMNIFICATION AND HOLD HARMLESS Indemnity for professional liability: When the law establishes a professional standard of care for Consultant’s Services, to the fullest extent permitted by law, Consultant shall indemnify, protect, defend and hold harmless City and any and all of its officials, employees, and agents (“Indemnified Parties”) from and against any and all losses, liabilities, damages, costs and expenses, including legal counsels’ fees and costs to the extent same are caused in whole or in part by any negligent or wrongful act, error or omission of Consultant, its officers, agents, employees or subconsultants (or any agency or individual that Consultant shall bear the legal liability thereof) in the performance of professional services under this Agreement. Indemnity for other than professional liability: Other than in the performance of professional services and to the full extent permitted by law, Consultant shall indemnify, protect, defend and hold harmless City, and any and all of its officials, employees, and agents from and against any liability (including liability for claims, suits, actions, arbitration proceedings, administrative proceedings, regulatory proceedings, losses, expenses or costs of any kind, whether actual, alleged or threatened, including legal counsels’ fees and costs, court costs, interest, defense costs, and expert witness fees), where the same arise out of, are a consequence of, or are in any way attributable to, in whole or in part, the performance of this Agreement by Consultant or by any individual or agency for which Consultant is legally liable, including but not limited to officers, agents, employees or subcontractors of Consultant. Consultant agrees to obtain executed indemnity agreements with provisions identical to those set forth here in this Section from each and every subcontractor, or any other person or entity involved by, for, with, or on behalf of Consultant in the 483 PSOMAS Page 5 of 15 performance of this Agreement. In the event Consultant fails to obtain such indemnity obligations from others as required here, Consultant agrees to be fully responsible according to the terms of this Section. Failure of City to monitor compliance with these requirements imposes no additional obligations on City and will in no way act as a waiver of any rights hereunder. This obligation to indemnify and defend City as set forth here is binding on the successors, assigns, or heirs of Consultant and shall survive the termination of this Agreement or this Section. City does not and shall not waive any rights that it may have against Consultant by reason of this Section, because of the acceptance by City, or the deposit with City, of any insurance policy or certificate required pursuant to this Agreement. The hold harmless and indemnification provisions shall apply regardless of whether or not said insurance policies are determined to be applicable to any losses, liabilities, damages, costs, and expenses described in this Section. 11. INSURANCE Consultant shall maintain prior to the beginning of and for the duration of this Agreement insurance coverage as specified in Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference as though set forth in full. 12. INDEPENDENT CONSULTANT Consultant is and shall at all times remain as to the City a wholly independent Contractor. The personnel performing the services under this Agreement on behalf of Consultant shall at all times be under Consultant’s exclusive direction and control. Neither City nor any of its officers, employees, or agents shall have control over the conduct of Consultant or any of Consultant’s officers, employees, or agents, except as set forth in this Agreement. Consultant shall not at any time or in any manner represent that it or any of its officers, employees, or agents are in any manner officers or employees, or agents of the City except as set forth in this Agreement. Consultant shall not incur or have the power to incur any debt, obligation, or liability against City, or bind City in any manner. No employee benefits shall be available to Consultant in connection with the performance of this Agreement. Except for the fees paid to Consultant as provided in the Agreement, City shall not pay salaries, wages, or other compensation to Consultant for performing services hereunder for City. City shall not be liable for compensation or indemnification to Consultant for injury or sickness arising out of performing services hereunder. 13. LEGAL RESPONSIBILITIES The Consultant shall keep itself informed of local, state, and federal laws and regulations which in any manner affect those employed by it or in any way affect the performance of its service pursuant to this Agreement. The Consultant shall at all times observe and comply with all such laws and regulations, including but not limited to the Americans with Disabilities Act and Occupational Safety and Health Administration laws 484 PSOMAS Page 6 of 15 and regulations. The Consultant shall comply with and sign Exhibit B, the Scope of Work Requirement for Professional Services Agreements Compliance with California Government Code Section 7550, when applicable. The City, and its officers and employees, shall not be liable at law or in equity occasioned by failure of the Consultant to comply with this Section. 14. ANTI DISCRIMINATION Neither the Consultant, nor any subconsultant under the Consultant, shall discriminate in employment of persons upon the work because of race, religious creed, color, national origin, ancestry, physical disability, mental disability, medical condition, genetic information, marital status, sex, gender, gender identity, gender expression, age, sexual orientation, or military and veteran status; or any other basis protected by applicable federal, state, or local law, except as provided in Section 12940 of the Government Code. Consultant shall have responsibility for compliance with this Section. 15. UNDUE INFLUENCE Consultant declares and warrants that no undue influence or pressure is used against or in concert with any officer or employee of the City in connection with the award, terms, or implementation of this Agreement, including any method of coercion, confidential financial arrangement, or financial inducement. No officer or employee of the City will receive compensation, directly or indirectly from Consultant, or any officer, employee, or agent of Consultant, in connection with the award of this Agreement or any work to be conducted as a result of this Agreement. Violation of this Section shall be a material breach of this Agreement entitling the City to any and all remedies at law or in equity. 16. NO BENEFIT TO ARISE TO LOCAL EMPLOYEES No member, officer, or employee of the City, or their designees or agents, and no public official who exercises authority over or responsibilities with respect to the Services during his/her tenure or for one year thereafter, shall have any interest, direct or indirect, in any agreement or sub-agreement, or the proceeds thereof, for work to be performed in connection with the Services performed under this Agreement. 17. CONFLICT OF INTEREST The Consultant covenants and agrees that if Consultant and/or its subconsultants intends to provide service or enter into any contract with any developer(s) and/or public agency(ies) owning property and/or processing an entitlement application for property in the City or its Area of Interest, during the Term of this Agreement, Consultant shall immediately notify the City, in writing, informing the City of the nature of the contract, prior to commencing with any work or entering into such contract. The City Manager shall determine whether a potential conflict of interest exists, and if his/her determination is that a conflict of interest is applicable, he/she will either deny the Consultant’s request to provide service or enter into any contract in 485 PSOMAS Page 7 of 15 violation of this Agreement, or will assign any work related to the conflict to an alternate Consultant. 18. NOTICE Any notice to be given pursuant to this Agreement shall be in writing, and all such notices and any other document to be delivered shall be delivered by personal service or by deposit in the United States mail, certified or registered, return receipt requested, with postage prepaid, and addressed to the party for whom intended as follows: To: City Manager City of Moorpark 799 Moorpark Ave. Moorpark, CA 93021 To: XXX PSOMAS 5 Hutton Centre Drive, Suite 300 Santa Ana, CA 92707 Either party may, from time to time, by written notice to the other, designate a different address or contact person, which shall be substituted for the one above specified. Notices, payments and other documents shall be deemed delivered upon receipt by personal service or as of the third (3rd) day after deposit in the United States mail. 19. CHANGE IN NAME Should a change be contemplated in the name or nature of the Consultant's legal entity, the Consultant shall first notify the City in order that proper steps may be taken to have the change reflected in the Agreement documents. 20. ASSIGNMENT Consultant shall not assign this Agreement or any of the rights, duties, or obligations hereunder. It is understood and acknowledged by the parties that Consultant is uniquely qualified to perform the services provided for in this Agreement. 21. LICENSES At all times during the term of this Agreement, Consultant shall have in full force and effect, all licenses required of it by law for the performance of the services in this Agreement. 22. VENUE AND GOVERNING LAW This Agreement is made, entered into, and executed in Ventura County, California, and any action filed in any court or for arbitration for the interpretation, 486 PSOMAS Page 8 of 15 enforcement or other action of the terms, conditions, or covenants referred to herein shall be filed in the applicable court in Ventura County, California. The City and Consultant understand and agree that the laws of the state of California shall govern the rights, obligations, duties, and liabilities of the parties to this Agreement and also govern the interpretation of this Agreement. 23. COST RECOVERY In the event any action, suit or proceeding is brought for the enforcement of, or the declaration of any right or obligation pursuant to this Agreement or as a result of any alleged breach of any provision of this Agreement, the prevailing party shall be entitled to recover its costs and expenses, including attorneys’ fees, from the losing party, and any judgment or decree rendered in such a proceeding shall include an award thereof. 24. ENTIRE AGREEMENT This Agreement and the Exhibits attached hereto contain the entire understanding between the parties relating to the obligations of the parties described in this Agreement. All prior or contemporaneous agreements, understandings, representations, and statements, oral or written, are merged into this Agreement and shall be of no further force or effect. Each party is entering into this Agreement based solely upon the representations set forth herein and upon each party’s own independent investigation of any and all facts such party deems material. 25. CAPTIONS OR HEADINGS The captions and headings of the various Articles, Paragraphs, and Exhibits of this Agreement are for convenience and identification only and shall not be deemed to limit or define the content of the respective Articles, Paragraphs, and Exhibits hereof. 26. AMENDMENTS Any amendment, modification, or variation from the terms of this Agreement shall be in writing and shall be effective only upon approval by both parties to this Agreement. 27. PRECEDENCE In the event of conflict, the requirements of the City’s Request for Proposal, if any, and this Agreement shall take precedence over those contained in the Consultant’s Proposal. 28. INTERPRETATION OF AGREEMENT Should interpretation of this Agreement, or any portion thereof, be necessary, it is deemed that this Agreement was prepared by the parties jointly and equally, and shall not be interpreted against either party on the ground that the party prepared the Agreement or caused it to be prepared. 487 PSOMAS Page 9 of 15 29. WAIVER No waiver of any provision of this Agreement shall be deemed, or shall constitute, a waiver of any other provision, whether or not similar, nor shall any such waiver constitute a continuing or subsequent waiver of the same provision. No waiver shall be binding unless executed in writing by the party making the waiver. 30. AUTHORITY TO EXECUTE The person or persons executing this Agreement on behalf of the Consultant warrants and represents that he/she has the authority to execute this Agreement on behalf of the Consultant and has the authority to bind Consultant to the performance of obligations hereunder. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed the day and year first above written. CITY OF MOORPARK PSOMAS __________________________________ __________________________________ Troy Brown, City Manager xxxx Attest: __________________________________ Ky Spangler, City Clerk 488 PSOMAS Page 10 of 15 Exhibit A INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS Prior to the beginning of and throughout the duration of Work, Consultant will maintain insurance in conformance with the requirements set forth below. Consultant will use existing coverage to comply with these requirements. If that existing coverage does not meet requirements set forth here, Consultant agrees to amend, supplement, or endorse the existing coverage to do so. Consultant acknowledges that the insurance coverage and policy limits set forth in this section constitute the minimum amount of coverage required. Any insurance proceeds available to the City in excess of the limits and coverage required in this Agreement and which is applicable to a given loss, will be available to the City. Consultant shall provide the following types and amounts of insurance: Commercial General Liability Insurance using Insurance Services Office (ISO) “Commercial General Liability” policy form CG 00 01 or the exact equivalent. Defense costs must be paid in addition to limits. There shall be no cross liability exclusion for claims or suits by one insured against another. Limits are subject to review but in no event less than $1,000,000 per occurrence for all covered losses and no less than $2,000,000 general aggregate. Business Auto Coverage on ISO Business Auto Coverage form CA 00 01 including symbol 1 (Any Auto) or the exact equivalent. Limits are subject to review, but in no event to be less than $1,000,000 per accident. If Consultant owns no vehicles, this requirement may be satisfied by a non-owned auto endorsement to the general liability policy described above. If Consultant or Consultant’s employees will use personal autos in any way on this project, Consultant shall provide evidence of personal auto liability for each such person. Workers’ Compensation on a state-approved policy form providing statutory benefits as required by law with employer’s liability limits no less than $1,000,000 per accident or disease. Professional Liability or Errors and Omissions Insurance as appropriate shall be written on a policy form coverage specifically designed to protect against acts, errors or omissions of the Consultant and “Covered Professional Services” as designated in the policy must specifically include work performed under this Agreement. The policy limit shall be no less than $1,000,000 per claim and in the aggregate. The policy must “pay on behalf of” the insured and must include a provision establishing the insurer’s duty to defend. The policy retroactive date shall be on or before the effective date of this Agreement. Excess or Umbrella Liability Insurance (Over Primary) if used to meet limit requirements, shall provide coverage at least as broad as specified for the underlying coverages. Coverage shall be provided on a “pay on behalf” basis, with defense costs 489 PSOMAS Page 11 of 15 payable in addition to policy limits. Policy shall contain a provision obligating insurer at the time insured’s liability is determined, not requiring actual payment by the insured first. There shall be no cross liability exclusion precluding coverage for claims or suits by one insured against another. Coverage shall be applicable to the City for injury to employees of Consultant, subconsultants, or others involved in the Work. The scope of coverage provided is subject to approval by the City following receipt of proof of insurance as required herein. Limits are subject to review. Insurance procured pursuant to these requirements shall be written by insurers that are admitted carriers in the State of California and with an A.M. Bests rating of A- or better and a minimum financial size of VII. General conditions pertaining to provision of insurance coverage by Consultant. Consultant and the City agree to the following with respect to insurance provided by Consultant: 1. Consultant agrees to have its insurer endorse the third party general liability coverage required herein to include as additional insureds the City, its officials, employees, and agents, using standard ISO endorsement CG 2010 and CG 2037 with edition acceptable to the City. Consultant also agrees to require all contractors and subcontractors to do likewise. 2. No liability insurance coverage provided to comply with this Agreement shall prohibit Consultant, or Consultant’s employees, or agents, from waiving the right to subrogation prior to a loss. Consultant agrees to waive subrogation rights against the City regardless of the applicability of any insurance proceeds, and to require all contractors and subcontractors to do likewise. 3. All insurance coverage and limits provided by Consultant and available or applicable to this Agreement are intended to apply to the full extent of the policies. Nothing contained in this Agreement or any other agreement relating to the City or its operation limits the application of such insurance coverage. 4. None of the coverages required herein will be in compliance with these requirements if they include limiting endorsement of any kind that has not been first submitted to the City and approved in writing. 5. No liability policy shall contain any provision or definition that would serve to eliminate so-called “third party action over” claims, including any exclusion for bodily injury to an employee of the insured or of any Consultant or Subconsultant. 6. All coverage types and limits required are subject to approval, modification, and additional requirements by the City, as the need arises. Consultant shall not make any reductions in scope of coverage (e.g. elimination of contractual liability or reduction of discovery period) that may affect the City’s protection without the City’s prior written consent. 490 PSOMAS Page 12 of 15 7. Proof of compliance with these insurance requirements, consisting of certificates of insurance evidencing all of the coverages required and an additional insured endorsement to Consultant’s general liability policy, shall be delivered to city at or prior to the execution of this Agreement. In the event such proof of any insurance is not delivered as required, or in the event such insurance is canceled or reduced at any time and no replacement coverage is provided, the City has the right, but not the duty, to obtain any insurance it deems necessary to protect its interests under this or any other Agreement and to pay the premium. Any premium so paid by the City shall be charged to and promptly paid by Consultant or deducted from sums due Consultant, at the City’s option. 8. Certificate(s) are to reflect that the insurer will provide thirty (30) days notice to the City of any cancellation or reduction of coverage. Consultant agrees to require its insurer to modify such certificates to delete any exculpatory wording stating that failure of the insurer to mail written notice of cancellation or reduction of coverage imposes no obligation, or that any party will “endeavor” (as opposed to being required) to comply with the requirements of the certificate. 9. It is acknowledged by the parties of this Agreement that all insurance coverage required to be provided by Consultant or any Subconsultant, is intended to apply first and on a primary, non-contributing basis in relation to any other insurance or self-insurance available to the City. 10. Consultant agrees to ensure that Subconsultants, and any other party involved with the Work who is brought onto or involved in the Work by Consultant, provide the same minimum insurance required of Consultant. Consultant agrees to monitor and review all such coverage and assumes all responsibility for ensuring that such coverage is provided in conformity with the requirements of this section. Consultant agrees that upon request, all agreements with Subconsultants and others engaged in the Work will be submitted to the City for review. 11. Consultant agrees not to self-insure or to use any self-insured retentions or deductibles on any portion of the insurance required herein and further agrees that it will not allow any contractor, subcontractor, Architect, Engineer, or other entity or person in any way involved in the performance of Work contemplated by this Agreement to self-insure its obligations to the City. If Consultant’s existing coverage includes a deductible or self-insured retention, the deductible or self- insured retention must be declared to the City. At that time, the City shall review options with the Consultant, which may include reduction or elimination of the deductible or self-insured retention, substitution of other coverage, or other solutions. 12. The City reserves the right at any time during the term of the Agreement to change the amounts and types of insurance required by giving the Consultant ninety (90) days advance written notice of such change. If such change results in substantial additional cost to the Consultant, the City will negotiate additional compensation proportional to the increased benefit to the City. 491 PSOMAS Page 13 of 15 13. For purposes of applying insurance coverage only, this Agreement will be deemed to have been executed immediately upon any party hereto taking any steps that can be deemed to be in furtherance of or towards performance of this Agreement. 14. Consultant acknowledges and agrees that any actual or alleged failure on the part of the City to inform Consultant of non-compliance with an insurance requirement in no way imposes any additional obligations to the City nor does it waive any rights hereunder in this or any other regard. 15. Consultant will renew the required coverage annually as long as the City, or its employees or agents face an exposure from operations of any type pursuant to this Agreement. This obligation applies whether or not the Agreement is canceled or terminated for any reason. Termination of this obligation is not effective until the City executes a written statement to that effect. 16. Consultant shall provide proof that policies of insurance required herein expiring during the term of this Agreement have been renewed or replaced with other policies providing at least the same coverage. Proof that such coverage has been ordered shall be submitted prior to expiration. A coverage binder or letter from Consultant’s insurance agent to this effect is acceptable. A certificate of insurance and/or additional insured endorsement as required in these specifications applicable to the renewing or new coverage must be provided to the City within five days of the expiration of coverage. 17. The provisions of any Workers’ Compensation or similar act will not limit the obligations of Consultant under this Agreement. Consultant expressly agrees not to use any statutory immunity defenses under such laws with respect to the City, its employees, officials and agents. 18. Requirements of specific coverage features or limits contained in this section are not intended as limitations on coverage, limits, or other requirements nor as a waiver of any coverage normally provided by any given policy. Specific reference to a given coverage feature is for purposes of clarification only as it pertains to a given issue, and is not intended by any party or insured to be limiting or all- inclusive. 19. These insurance requirements are intended to be separate and distinct from any other provision in this Agreement and are intended by the parties here to be interpreted as such. 20. The requirements in this section supersede all other sections and provisions of this Agreement to the extent that any other section or provision conflicts or impairs the provisions of this section. 21. Consultant agrees to be responsible for ensuring that no contract used by any party involved in any way with the Work reserves the right to charge the City or 492 PSOMAS Page 14 of 15 Consultant for the cost of additional insurance coverage required by this Agreement. Any such provisions are to be deleted with reference to the City. It is not the intent of the City to reimburse any third party for the cost of complying with these requirements. There shall be no recourse against the City for payment of premiums or other amounts with respect thereto. 22. Consultant agrees to provide immediate notice to City of any claim or loss against Consultant arising out of the work performed under this Agreement. The City assumes no obligation or liability by such notice, but has the right (but not the duty) to monitor the handling of any such claim or claims if they are likely to involve the City. 493 PSOMAS Page 15 of 15 Exhibit B CITY OF MOORPARK Scope of Work Requirement for Professional Services Agreements Compliance with California Government Code Section 7550 Consultant shall sign and include this page in any document or written reports prepared by Consultant for the City of Moorpark (City) to which California Government Code Section 7550 (Government Code § 7550) applies. Government Code §7550 reads: “(a) Any document or written report prepared for or under the direction of a state or local agency, that is prepared in whole or in part by nonemployees of the agency, shall contain the numbers and dollar amounts of all contracts and subcontracts relating to the preparation of the document or written report; if the total cost for the work performed by nonemployees of the agency exceeds five thousand dollars ($5,000). The contract and subcontract numbers and dollar amounts shall be contained in a separate section of the document or written report. (b) When multiple documents or written reports are the subject or product of the contract, the disclosure section may also contain a statement indicating that the total contract amount represents compensation for multiple documents or written reports.” For all Professional Services Agreement with a total dollar value in excess of $5,000, a signed and completed copy of this form must be attached to all documents or completed reports submitted to the City pursuant to the Scope of Work. Does the dollar value of this Professional Services Agreement exceed $5,000? X Yes  No If yes, then the following information must be provided in compliance with Government Code § 7550: 1. Dollar amount of Agreement/Contract: $ 219,869 2. Dollar amount of Subcontract: $ ____________ 3. Does the total contract amount represent compensation for multiple documents or written reports? X Yes  No I have read the foregoing Code section and will comply with Government Code §7550. PSOMAS __________________________________ ______________________ XXXX Date 494 5 Hutton Centre Drive Suite 300 Santa Ana, CA 92707 Tel 714.751.7373 Fax 714.545.8883 www.Psomas.com October 22, 2020 Revised December 11, 2020 Ms. Jessica Sandifer VIA EMAIL Community Services Manager jsandifer@moorparkca.gov Parks, Recreation and Community Services Department City of Moorpark 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark, California 93021 Subject: Proposal for Preparation of a Program Environmental Impact Report and Technical Studies for the Civic Center Master Plan Project in the City of Moorpark Dear Ms. Sandifer: Psomas appreciates the opportunity to submit a Scope of Work (SOW) for preparation of a Program Environmental Impact Report (PEIR) for the Civic Center Master Plan Project (Project), located in Moorpark (City). The City of Moorpark is the Lead Agency on the PEIR. Psomas is a full-service environmental, engineering, construction management, and land survey firm. Psomas’ Environmental Services Group provides California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) documentation; biological resources surveys and assessments; regulatory services and permitting; habitat restoration planning; cultural resources assessments and monitoring; air quality, greenhouse gas emissions, and noise analyses; and Geographic Information Systems (GIS) mapping and spatial analyses. Psomas proposes a Project team with Master Planning CEQA expertise and with relevant experience to assist the City of Moorpark with preparation of a PEIR. Mr. Glenn Lajoie, AICP, is a Vice President/Senior Project Manager with over 30 years of experience in preparing environmental documentation pursuant to CEQA and NEPA for a variety of project types, including residential and nonresidential projects, as well as policy, specific and master plan projects throughout California. Mr. Lajoie will operate as the main point of contact for environmental documentation and process to the City and will serve as the day-to-day Project Manager with the responsibility of ensuring work is completed on schedule and within budget. Mr. Lajoie will be supported by a team of highly qualified and experienced in-house staff, and all technical analyses for the PEIR included in this SOW will be conducted by Psomas’ technical staff. Our Work Program (SOW) and Budget are included with this submittal. Our approach outlines a collaborative process for preparation of sound CEQA compliance documentation. We are proud of our history of working closely with agency staff to effectively navigate the environmental compliance process, while being flexible and responsive. Our team is committed to successful completion of this project, while ensuring the City’s expectations for a sound CEQA process. EXHIBIT C 495 Ms. Jessica Sandifer December 11, 2020 Page 2 We appreciate the opportunity to provide the SOW and Budget, and we look forward to assisting the City with this Project. Please contact Glenn by phone at 714.815.8124 or by email at Glenn.Lajoie@Psomas.com if you have any questions or would like additional information. Sincerely, Jim Hunter, ENV SP Glenn Lajoie, AICP Vice President Vice President/Senior Project Manager Attachments: A – Scope of Work B – Budget R:\Proposals\Moorpar\Civic Center MP\SOW Moorpark Civic Center-121120.docx 496 Moorpark Civic Center Master Plan R:\Proposals\Moorpar\Civic Center MP\SOW Moorpark Civic Center-121120.docx A-1 Scope of Work ATTACHMENT A SCOPE OF WORK AND BUDGET MOORPARK CIVIC CENTER MASTER PLAN PROGRAM ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT December 11, 2020 PROJECT UNDERSTANDING It is our understanding that the City of Moorpark is moving forward the proposed Civic Center Master Plan. A conceptual alternative was approved by the City Council in mid-September 2020. Concept B involves the construction of the library building on the north side of High Street, west of Moorpark Avenue, generally across from the Post Office parking lot. The City Hall building would be constructed where the existing library is currently located. The Civic Center Master Plan has evolved for many years and the City initiated environmental review in 2013 (SCH. No. 2011041025). A Program Environmental Impact Report (PEIR) was drafted and put on hold when the entire Master Planning effort was put on hold at the time. The current review effort will account for and carry over, to the extent possible, the baseline analysis as deemed appropriate for Concept B. ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS APPROACH Psomas proposes to prepare a PEIR in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (Public Resources Code 21000-21177) and the State CEQA Guidelines (California Code of Regulation, Title 14, Division 6, Chapter 3, Section 15000-15387). A PEIR would be the appropriate CEQA document due to the potential for significant environmental impacts. Additionally, a program-level as opposed to a project-level EIR is appropriate for the Civic Center Project (Project or proposed Project), as it will accommodate tiering future phases to streamline the entitlement process. The PEIR will “focus out” the topical issues and environmental checklist questions that may not be applicable and thus will not require detailed evaluation in the PEIR. TASK 1 PROJECT INITIATION Kick-Off Meeting Psomas will attend a kick-off meeting with the City, as appropriate. This meeting will provide an opportunity to discuss the approach to preparing the environmental document; further define the SOW; identify and discuss the key community issues and concerns, as applicable; and identify information needs. The Project schedule will be discussed, and key milestones defined. It is assumed that available Project information, as applicable, would be provided at this meeting. Subtask 1.1 Deliverables  Attendance at a kick-off meeting Data Collection and Site Visit Psomas will prepare a Data Needs Request to obtain data related to Project construction and operational activities that are needed for the technical analyses (e.g., Air Quality, Greenhouse Gas [GHG] Emissions, Energy, and Noise) for the PEIR topical sections. Psomas will review existing City documents, including but not limited to the City of Moorpark General Plan, Moorpark General Plan Environmental Impact 497 Moorpark Civic Center Master Plan R:\Proposals\Moorpar\Civic Center MP\SOW Moorpark Civic Center-121120.docx A-2 Scope of Work Report; the General Plan Update Existing Conditions report, the Downtown Specific Plan, the Municipal Code; Standard Conditions for Approval and other pertinent City documents. Additionally, Psomas will conduct a site visit to assist in the description of the environmental setting and to photographically document the site and surrounding area. Subtask 1.2 Deliverables  Electronic Copy (email) of Data Needs Request Project Description Psomas will prepare a Project description, appropriate for a PEIR. The Project description will include, but not be limited to; Project objectives, phasing, entitlements, site plan and other plans, as available; infrastructure and wet and dry utilities; and any other features unique to the Project that are integral to the analysis of the environmental impacts. Upon completion, Psomas will provide the Project description to the City for review. Psomas will revise the Project description to address the comments the City may have, and upon approval by the City, provide it to the technical team for preparation of the studies/analyses. Subtask 1.3 Deliverables  Electronic Copies (email) of Draft and Final Project Description TASK 2 TECHNICAL ANALYSES/STUDIES Proposed Technical Analyses Several technical analyses will be prepared as part of the PEIR by Psomas’ in-house technical experts and our historic resources subconsultant in support of an adequate environmental document, consistent with CEQA requirements. These analyses include Air Quality, Energy, GHG Emissions, Noise, Transportation Impact Assessment (TIA), Tribal Cultural Resources and Historic Resources. The scopes of the said analyses are provided in Section 4.1. Subtask 2.1 Deliverables  Technical Analyses to be submitted to City for review prior to completing Administrative Draft PEIR (Section 4.1) TASK 3 INITIAL STUDY/NOTICE OF PREPARATION AND SCOPING MEETING Initial Study/Notice of Preparation Psomas will prepare an Administrative Draft Initial Study/Notice of Preparation (IS/NOP) for review by the City. If it can be adequately documented that there would be no Project impact on a topic, that topic will be “focused out” of the PEIR. For other topical issues, there may be specific checklist questions that would have no impact and could be focused out. Psomas will also prepare the NOP, which will provide an overview of the Project; Project objectives; alternatives to be evaluated; and expected required permits. The NOP will also serve as a Scoping Meeting notice. Upon completion, the Draft IS/NOP will be submitted to the City. Psomas will revise the IS/NOP to address the City’s comments and prepare a Public Review Draft IS/NOP for approval prior to the 30-day public review. Psomas will revise and distribute the IS/NOP based on the City’s distribution list. Psomas will also prepare a Notice of Completion (NOC) and Notice of Availability (NOA) of the NOP. The IS/NOP and the NOC will be filed with the County Clerk-Recorder and the State Clearinghouse (SCH). 498 Moorpark Civic Center Master Plan R:\Proposals\Moorpar\Civic Center MP\SOW Moorpark Civic Center-121120.docx A-3 Scope of Work Subtask 3.1 Deliverables  Electronic Copies (email) of the Administrative Draft and Public Review Draft IS/NOPs  Electronic Copies (CDs) of IS/NOP for Public Review Public Scoping Meeting Psomas will attend one EIR Scoping Meeting, before the Planning Commission, during the 30-day public review of the IS/NOP. It is assumed that the City will organize the Scoping Meeting. Psomas will prepare a PowerPoint presentation for the Scoping Meeting to describe the environmental process in preparing the PEIR. Subsequently, Psomas will document the meeting and prepare a summary of the meeting for inclusion in the PEIR. Subtask 3.2 Deliverables  Electronic Copy of the PowerPoint Presentation  Electronic Copies (email) of IS/NOP for Public Review  Attendance at Scoping Meeting TASK 4 DRAFT PROGRAM ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT Administrative Draft Program Environmental Impact Report and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Psomas will prepare an Administrative Draft PEIR in accordance with CEQA, the State CEQA Guidelines, and pertinent case law. The analysis will be based upon the IS/NOP comments received; community and agency input at the Scoping Meeting; technical evaluation of the proposed Project; and pertinent data. Psomas’ approach to preparing PEIR sections is provided below. A. Executive Summary: Psomas will summarize the Project location, Project description, areas of controversy and issues to be resolved, summary of impacts, mitigation measures, and alternatives. B. Introduction: The Introduction will cite the provisions of CEQA, the Moorpark CEQA Implementing Procedures, Project background and history, purpose of the PEIR, environmental issues assessed in the PEIR, the environmental review process and organization of the PEIR. This section will also summarize the scoping process and include a general overview of the existing environmental setting of the site and the surrounding area. C. Project Description: This section will incorporate the Description developed in subtask 1.3 and will be further updated to incorporate additional project information in order to move forward with the CEQA level analysis. The Project Description is a critical element of the environmental review and establishes the foundation for the topical issues to be reviewed. This section will include Project location, Project components and characteristics, objectives, phasing, intended uses of the PEIR and discretionary actions. D. Environmental Analysis: Each topical PEIR section will contain a discussion of existing conditions; the regulatory framework; applicable Project design features and regulatory requirements; significant environmental effects; and mitigation measures, if required. D.1. Aesthetics. Psomas will conduct a site visit to document existing views in the Project vicinity in order to qualitatively address the anticipated effects on viewsheds and scenic vistas, potential degradation of visual character and anticipated light and glare issues associated with the 499 Moorpark Civic Center Master Plan R:\Proposals\Moorpar\Civic Center MP\SOW Moorpark Civic Center-121120.docx A-4 Scope of Work Master Plan. It is recognized that the project site is located within a mostly developed area of the west downtown. Development of the project is not anticipated to have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista, nor would it damage scenic resources within a state scenic highway. The analysis will focus on changes to visual character of the area from surrounding public views. The compatibility and introduction of new structures/improvements in the area, including building height and design/materials, when compared to surrounding uses, will be studied. Although this SOW does not include preparation of visual simulations, graphics available from the Master Planning process will be incorporated. D.2. Air Quality Emissions. Psomas will develop an air quality emissions analyses based on a review the Project plans, traffic study, and related Project data. Psomas will prepare a Data Needs Request to obtain general data relative to phasing, building energy use, stationary sources, and Project features related to air quality. Based on the information provided, Psomas will draft reasonable worst-case scenarios for anticipated construction activities (i.e., type of construction and construction start and completion dates) and long-term operations to be used as the basis of the air quality modeling. Psomas will conduct the air quality analysis consistent with the Ventura County Air Pollution Control District’s (VCAPCD’s) recommended methods for CEQA analyses and will evaluate the Project’s contribution to regional emissions to the air basin. For the regional emissions analysis, Psomas will calculate the Project’s construction and operational criteria pollutant regional (mass) emissions using the California Emissions Estimator Model (CalEEMod). Model results will be compared with the VCAPCD’s CEQA regional emissions thresholds to determine the potential for Project related impacts to the air basin’s regional emissions. For the operations phase of the Project, it is expected that a qualitative analysis will demonstrate that the Project would not generate traffic congestion at a major intersection at a magnitude that would cause a local carbon monoxide (CO) “hotspot”. Thus, no dispersion modeling is included in this SOW for CO analysis. Project area exposure to construction phase toxic air contaminants (TACs) and odors will also be addressed qualitatively. Additionally, the analysis will include an evaluation of Project conformity with the Ventura County Air Quality Management Plan (AQMP) for the South-Central Coast Air Basin. Mitigation measures that reduce construction and operations phase impacts will be identified, as necessary. If regional and/or local construction or operations phase emissions exceed the VCAPCD thresholds of significance, Psomas will work with the City to determine feasible mitigation measures. The air quality analysis will be incorporated as a section within the PEIR with model results included in the appendix. D.3. Biological Resources. Psomas will update the previous biological assessment for the site. Prior to initiation of the field survey on the project site, Psomas will review all available and applicable biological information prepared for the project area. Psomas will conduct a literature review to determine which species have been identified as special status by state, federal and local resources agencies and organizations and have a potential to occur within the project site or immediate vicinity. Following the literature review, a general walk-over survey will be conducted to identify and map the extent and distribution of vegetation types on the project site, including any special status vegetation types. The survey effort will be focused on areas that are not currently developed. A description of the existing quality and species composition of the vegetation types will be documented and an assessment of the potential for special status plant and wildlife species to occur on site will be completed. The scope of work does not include focused surveys for special status plant and wildlife species or a jurisdictional delineation, which are not expected due to the setting of the project site. D.4. Tribal Cultural and Historic Resources. The review presented in the 2013 Screencheck Draft EIR will be verified for the current Master Plan Project description. 500 Moorpark Civic Center Master Plan R:\Proposals\Moorpar\Civic Center MP\SOW Moorpark Civic Center-121120.docx A-5 Scope of Work Under Assembly Bill (AB) 52, the City of Moorpark, as the lead agency, is required to initiate consultation with California Native American tribes that are geographically and culturally affiliated with the project area and have requested notification regarding projects within their jurisdiction. Under this task, Psomas will assist the City with consultation to ensure meaningful consultation with interested Native American groups can be completed in accordance with AB 52. For Historic Resources, Psomas has retained the services of Architectural Historian Pamela Daly MSHP, who conducted the original historic assessment for the 2013 EIR. Ms. Daly will prepare a Phase 1 report to analyze the current condition of historic resources with int project area and assess any potential project impacts to those resources from project activities. The original 2013 historic report will be revised and updated with an analysis of the current project, and the results of a due diligence site visit to the project area. The tasks associated with this study will include:  Perform an intensive pedestrian level survey of the project area to identify built environment resources;  Update of property information available from local and regional archival resources;  Identify potential project activities that could affect the integrity of historical resources within the project area. This effort will involve a partnership between Ms. Daly and Mr. John Loomis, Principal Architect at Thirtieth Street Architects. Ms. Daly and Mr. Loomis conducted the same partnership assessment for the 2013 analysis;  Consult with the project proponents regarding the treatment of historic resources, as needed; and  Prepare a Phase 1 letter report presenting findings and mitigation measures to address adverse effects to historical resources. D.5. Energy. Psomas will develop an Energy analysis for the Project, which will include a discussion of regulatory setting, energy demands, Project energy efficiency measures, and impact assessment. The regulatory setting will include a discussion of the local, State and federal policies and regulations that apply to the Project. The discussion of Project related energy demands including quantification of anticipated energy consumption from the construction and operations phases. Construction phase energy demand is due to diesel and gasoline consumption used during the development of the Project. The operations phase of the Project would consume energy related to lighting and heating needs as well as vehicle trips. Potential impacts will be assessed relative to Project consistency with those policies and measures related to energy efficiency within the General Plan and the State of California Energy Efficiency Standards. Mitigation measures, if needed, will be discussed to reduce any significant energy impacts. D.6. Geology and Soils. The review presented in the 2013 Screencheck Draft EIR will be verified for the current Master Plan Project description. D.7. Hazards and Hazardous Materials. The review presented in the 2013 Screencheck Draft EIR will be verified for the current Master Plan Project description. In addition, Psomas will contract with Environmental Data Resources (EDR) to complete a current radius search of hazardous material databases. Psomas will summarize the findings of the report and qualitatively address other potential impacts pertaining to hazards. D.8. Hydrology and Water Quality. The review presented in the 2013 Screencheck Draft EIR will be verified for the current Master Plan Project description. 501 Moorpark Civic Center Master Plan R:\Proposals\Moorpar\Civic Center MP\SOW Moorpark Civic Center-121120.docx A-6 Scope of Work D.9. Land Use and Planning. Psomas will describe the existing condition of the site and the surrounding land uses based on a site visit (Task 1.2) and review of the relevant available documents and information and analyze the Project’s compatibility with the surrounding uses. The Project would include unique development standards and design guidelines in the Downtown Specific Plan to accommodate and support the uses and product types. Psomas will also evaluate the proposed Project’s consistency with relevant local and regional planning policies, including, but not limited to, the City of Moorpark General Plan policies; Southern California Association of Governments’ (SCAG’s) regional planning policies; and other relevant policy documents. The analysis will include a review of LOS in terms of consistency with the City’s General Plan. D.10. Noise and Vibration. Psomas will analyze temporary noise and vibration impacts from construction activities and will also review the Project plans, design, and traffic impact analyses to evaluate operational noise impacts to sensitive receptors. To characterize the existing noise environment, noise monitoring data from the 2013 SDEIR will be presented. The Project is anticipated to involve noise sources, including HVAC (heating, ventilation, and air conditioning) units, outdoor park area, and parking lots. The analysis will compare noise impacts with the standards in the City’s Noise Element of the General Plan and Noise Ordinances. Increases in traffic noise on local roadways will also be quantified using the Federal Highway Administrations RD-77-108 traffic noise model. Construction activities will be evaluated for vibration induced impacts to adjacent occupied and unoccupied buildings as well as the potential for cosmetic building damage. Vibration thresholds will be based on the susceptibility of buildings to be damaged by vibration and will account for the era in which nearby structures were constructed. Mitigation measures that reduce construction and operations phase impacts will be identified, as necessary. If regional and/or local construction noise or vibration exceed the thresholds of significance, Psomas will work with the City to determine feasible mitigation measures. The results will be provided in the Noise and Vibration section of the PEIR and supporting calculations will be included as an appendix. D.11. Public Services. Psomas will contact potentially affected agencies to confirm relevant existing conditions, project impacts and recommended mitigation measures. The discussion will focus on the potential alteration of existing facilities, extension or expansion of new facilities and the increased demand on services based on the proposed land use. D.12. Traffic and Circulation. Psomas will prepare a Traffic Impact Analysis for the Civic Center Project. The following outlines the Psomas scope of services for the traffic study: Task 1 – Traffic Data Collection It is assumed that turning movement data will be provided for six intersections. The intersections listed below were selected in coordination with the City.  Moorpark Avenue/Walnut Canyon Road and Casey Road  Moorpark Avenue and Charles Street/Civic Center Driveway  Moorpark Avenue and High Street  Spring Road and High Street/Princeton Avenue  Moorpark Avenue and First Street/Poindexter Avenue  Moorpark Avenue and Los Angeles Avenue 502 Moorpark Civic Center Master Plan R:\Proposals\Moorpar\Civic Center MP\SOW Moorpark Civic Center-121120.docx A-7 Scope of Work Due to the Covid-19 pandemic, traffic volume data will not be collected. Instead, the City will provide traffic volume data for the six study intersections from recent studies; Psomas will review the data and check for inconsistencies between intersections and data sources. Task 2 – Traffic Analysis Psomas will prepare a Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) in coordination with the City requirements. The Level of Service (LOS) for each of the study intersections will be evaluated for the following scenarios:  Existing Conditions  Existing Plus Project Conditions  2024 With Related Projects  2024 With Related Projects Plus Project  2040 Without Project  2040 Plus Project It is assumed that related projects to be used in the 2024 analysis will be provided by the City, and it is assumed that no more than 10 projects will be included in the analysis. If more than 10 projects are to be included, an additional fee will be needed. Because the current General Plan is outdated and the upcoming General Plan will not be completed until 2022, the 2040 background traffic volumes will be estimated using a growth rate determined in coordination with the City. All trip generation calculations will be based on the 10th Edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation Manual. Per the City guidelines, the Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) methodology will be used to evaluate the signalized study intersections, and the Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) methodology will be used to determine the Level of Service (LOS) for the unsignalized study intersections. For CEQA purposes, a Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) analysis will also be conducted. The project is located in a Transit Priority Area and is therefore considered to have a less-than- significant traffic impact per the guidelines. This information will be included in the traffic study for documentation purposes. The results of the analyses and mitigation measures (if needed) will be summarized in a Traffic Impact Analysis report. The study will also address any necessary fair share mitigation for cumulative traffic impacts. Psomas will prepare one draft and one final report. D.13. Utilities and Service Systems. The Project has the potential to increase the demand for wet and dry utility services (e.g., water, wastewater treatment, solid waste, electricity, gas, telephone, and cable). Psomas will coordinate with applicable utility providers to obtain the necessary information regarding existing capacity, supply, and future demand from the proposed Project. D.14. Wildfire. The project area is identified within a High Fire Hazard Area by the Ventura County Fire Protection District. The review will identify project measures and applicable standards to be included for project design and development. The fire hazard zones will be identified and described in detail in the PEIR. D.15. Greenhouse Gas Emissions. Psomas will prepare a GHG emissions analysis to evaluate potential impacts attributable to the Project. The quantitative Project analysis will use the data 503 Moorpark Civic Center Master Plan R:\Proposals\Moorpar\Civic Center MP\SOW Moorpark Civic Center-121120.docx A-8 Scope of Work and scenarios developed for the air quality analysis and assumptions for the Project’s anticipated electricity, natural gas, and water usage. Psomas will calculate construction and operational GHG emissions concurrently with the air quality emissions using CalEEMod. Psomas will compare the change in GHG emissions with criteria that have been recommended by the VCAPCD or a threshold determined by coordination with City staff. Psomas will also determine whether implementation of the Project would conflict with applicable State, regional, and City plans, policies, or regulations adopted for the purpose of reducing GHG emissions. If there is a potential significant impact, Psomas will recommend measures to reduce GHG emissions. The GHG analysis will be incorporated as a section within the PEIR. E. Cumulative Impacts: In addition to the analysis of potential short- and long-term Project-specific impacts, Psomas will conduct a cumulative impact analysis based on the provisions of Section 15130(b)(1) of the State CEQA Guidelines. Psomas will coordinate with City staff to obtain a list of related projects. The evaluation method will vary depending on the technical issue to be addressed. F. Alternatives: Psomas will provide an assessment of alternatives to the proposed Project. The range of alternatives is expected to include the “No Project” alternative and up to three alternatives, including alternatives considered through the Master Plan process. Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15126.6, Psomas will provide an analysis which compares environmental impacts for each alternative to that of the proposed project. The review is expected to be a qualitative analysis and subject to further discussions with the City. The alternatives review will culminate with the selection of the environmentally superior alternative in accordance with CEQA. G. Required CEQA Topics: Other CEQA-required sections include long-term impacts; significant irreversible environmental changes; significant unavoidable adverse impacts; growth-inducing impacts; references; agencies and persons consulted; and preparers and contributors. Through the course of PEIR preparation, if mitigation measures are identified, in compliance with Section 21081.6 of the California Public Resources Code, Psomas will prepare a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP) as part of the Administrative Draft PEIR document. The MMRP will be prepared in matrix format and will provide the timing and responsibility for each mitigation measure. It should be noted that, later during the public hearings, if the Planning Commission or City Council modify the Project and/or recommend standard conditions of approval/mitigation measures for the proposed Project, Psomas will revise the MMRP. Upon completion, the Administrative Draft PEIR and the MMRP will be submitted for review by the City. Subtask 4.1 Deliverables  Electronic Copy (email) of Administrative Draft PEIR and MMRP Public Review Draft Program Environmental Impact Report and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Upon receipt of comments from the City, Psomas will review the comments, revise the document, including the MMRP, accordingly, and prepare the Public Review Draft PEIR and MMRP for a final review before distribution. This task assumes that no new technical analyses or new quantitative analyses will be required. If conflicting or unclear comments are received, Psomas will coordinate with the City to resolve any issues. Subtask 4.2 Deliverables  Electronic Copy (email) of Public Review Draft PEIR and MMRP 504 Moorpark Civic Center Master Plan R:\Proposals\Moorpar\Civic Center MP\SOW Moorpark Civic Center-121120.docx A-9 Scope of Work Draft Program Environmental Impact Report This SOW assumes that only minor editorial revisions to the text of the Public Review Draft and MMRP will be required, and no substantive revisions to any technical analyses will be necessary. Psomas will revise the document, as necessary, and prepare the Draft PEIR, including MMRP for a final review prior to distribution. Psomas will distribute the Draft PEIR (CDs), including Technical Appendices and MMRP along with an NOA, for a 45-day public review period, using a distribution list to be provided by the City. Psomas will submit the Draft PEIR and SCH electronic submittal form to the SCH with a NOC and NOA via electronic submission. Psomas will file the notices with the County Clerk. Psomas will attend a public comment meeting before the Planning Commission during the 45-day review period (refer to subtask 6.2). Subtask 4.3 Deliverables  Electronic Copy (email) of the Draft PEIR and MMRP  Electronic submittal of the Draft PEIR, NOI, and NOC to the SCH  Distribution of up of 30 Electronic Copies (CDs) of the Draft PEIR  Filing the NOI at the County Clerk  5 Hard Copies of the Draft PEIR, NOI and NOC TASK 5 FINAL PROGRAM ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT Administrative Draft Response to Comments/Errata Following the 45-day public review period, Psomas will review the comments received and meet with the City to discuss the approach. Psomas, with assistance from the Project team, will prepare responses to comments that raise significant environmental issues. The revisions that result from the comments will be identified in a Revisions and Clarifications Section (Errata) of the Responses to Comments (RTC) document. It is assumed that Psomas will spend approximately 40 hours of technical staff time on this task. If it is determined that additional effort will be necessary, or if late comment letters are received that raise significant issues, a budget augment may be required. Public Review Draft Response to Comments/Errata and Final Program Environmental Impact Report Following the City’s review of the Administrative Draft RTC, Psomas will revise the responses and compile the Final RTC/Errata and Final PEIR and coordinate with the Project team on the revisions. The revised Final PEIR will be submitted for a final review by the City prior to mailing responses to public agencies at least 10 days prior to a decision on the Final PEIR, as required by CEQA. Additionally, Psomas will prepare the Notice of Determination (NOD) to be signed by the City upon certification of the Final PEIR and action on the Project. Psomas will file the NOD with the County Clerk and the SCH. The cost estimate includes the California Department of Fish and Wildlife filing fees, as necessary, and County Clerk Recorder processing fee. It is assumed that the City will reimburse Psomas within three weeks of the NOD filing. Subtask 5.2 Deliverables  Electronic Copy (email) of RTC/Errata and Final PEIR  Thirty (30) Electronic Copies (CDs) of the RTC/Errata for Distribution  Electronic Copies of the Draft and Final NOD  Five hard copies of the RTC/Errata and Final EIR 505 Moorpark Civic Center Master Plan R:\Proposals\Moorpar\Civic Center MP\SOW Moorpark Civic Center-121120.docx A-10 Scope of Work Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations As part of the Final PEIR, Psomas will prepare the Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations, if applicable, for the Project pursuant to Sections 21081 and 21081.6 of the California Public Resources Code. The draft and final version of the Findings will be submitted to the City for review, comments and approval. Subtask 5.3 Deliverables  Electronic Copies (email) of the Draft and Final Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Consideration TASK 6 PROJECT MANAGEMENT, MEETINGS, AND PUBLIC HEARINGS Project Management Psomas will be responsible for managing the CEQA process for the City. This includes ongoing coordination with the City to ensure compliance with the SOW and schedule and to ensure that information is disseminated, as necessary. The Project Management team, led by Glenn Lajoie, AICP, will undertake consultation and coordination with City Staff and review all deliverables for compliance with CEQA and the City of Moorpark’s review requirements. Subtask 6.1 Deliverables  Project Management and Coordination throughout the life of the Project Project Meetings This task includes attendance at four coordination meetings, as necessary, with the City (in addition to the Project kick-off meeting and Scoping Meeting). This SOW also assumes four conference calls. The environmental Project Manager will attend/participate in all meetings and conference calls (four hours for a meeting, including preparation and travel time and one hour for a conference call). We understand that meetings may be in person or over the phone at the discretion of City staff. Additional meetings/conference calls will be billed on a time-and-materials basis, based on hourly rates and subject to prior approval. Subtask 6.2 Deliverables  Four (4) Meeting with the City  Four (4) Conference Calls with the City Public Meetings or Hearings Psomas will attend at up to five public meetings or hearings. Psomas will be available to provide advice and input to the City and address questions regarding CEQA; the environmental review process; and the findings of the PEIR analyses, as appropriate. This task assumes public hearings will be attended by the Project Manager and up to two Psomas technical staff. The supporting staff in attendance will be based on the issues that arise out of the public review process. Additional public hearing attendance will be billed on a time-and-materials basis, based on hourly rates and subject to prior approval. Subtask 6.3 Deliverables  Five (5) Public Meetings or Hearings 506 Moorpark Civic Center Master Plan R:\Proposals\Moorpar\Civic Center MP\SOW Moorpark Civic Center-121120.docx A-11 Scope of Work PROJECT SCHEDULE This SOW assumes an approximate 8 to 10-month schedule, upon receipt of information for the Project Description. The 8 to 10-month schedule for the preparation of the PEIR does not include the approval process for the PEIR. Psomas will work diligently and coordinate closely with the City to ensure the PEIR is completed efficiently, on time, and within budget. All time-saving approaches will be utilized to speed up the schedule. However, Psomas will ensure that time-saving approaches will not jeopardize the quality of the document. The proposed Project will be initiated upon award of contract and after attendance at the Project’s kick-off meeting (Task 1.1). 507 Moorpark Civic Center Master Plan R:\Proposals\Moorpar\Civic Center MP\SOW Moorpark Civic Center-121120.docx B-1 Budget ATTACHMENT B PROJECT BUDGET MOORPARK CIVIC CENTER MASTER PLAN PROGRAM ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT December 11, 2020 Task Task Total Task 1 - Project Initiation $10.898.00 1.1 Kickoff Meeting $1,380.00 1.2 Data Collection and Site Visit $2,820.00 1.3 Project Description $6,698.00 Task 2 - Technical Analysis and Studies 2.1 Proposed Tech Analysis (See 4.1 below) Task 3 - IS/NOP and Scoping Meeting $5,916.00 3.1 IS/NOP $4,076.00 3.2 Scoping Meeting $1,840.00 Task 4 - Draft PEIR $149,296.00 4.1 Admin Draft PEIR and Mitigation Monitoring $7,812.00 A. Executive Summary $1,035.00 B. Introduction $805.00 C. Project Description $920.00 D. Environmental Analysis D1. Aesthetics $4,460.00 D2. Air Quality and GHG $8,380.00 D3. Biology $7,180.00 D4. Tribal and Historic Resources $12,790.00 D5. Energy $4,420.00 D6. Geology and Soils $2,760.00 D7. Hazards and hazardous Materials $3,260.00 D8. Hydrology and Water Quality $3,820.00 D9. Land Use and Planning $3,460.00 D10. Noise and Vibration $7,680.00 D11. Public Services $2,760.00 D12. Traffic and Circulation $31,760.00 D13. Utilities and Services $2,760.00 D14. Wildfire $1,840.00 D15. Greenhouse Gas Emissions Analysis $460.00 E. Cumulative $7,180.00 F. Alternatives $12,404.00 508 Moorpark Civic Center Master Plan R:\Proposals\Moorpar\Civic Center MP\SOW Moorpark Civic Center-121120.docx B-2 Budget Task Task Total G. Required CEQA Topics $2,300.00 4.2 Public Review Draft EIR $10,220.00 4.3 Draft EIR $9,830.00 Task 5 - Final EIR $17,459.00 5.1 Admin Draft Response to Comments $11,158.00 5.2 Public Review Response to Comments $4,323.00 5.3 Findings $3,978.00 Task 6 - Project Management, Meetings and Hearings $33,300.00 6.1 Project Management $17,250.00 6.2 Project Meetings $7,590.00 6.3 Public Meetings and hearings $8,460.00 Subtotal $216,869.00 Direct Costs $3,000.00 Total Estimated Cost $219,869.00 509