HomeMy WebLinkAboutAGENDA REPORT 2021 0106 CCSA REG ITEM 08ACITY OF MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA
City Council Meeting
of January 6, 2021
ACTION Adopted Resolution No. 2021-
3983 Rejecting General Plan Amendment
Request and Agendized a Future Item to
Allow Submittal of a New Proposal Outside
of the Standing Pre-Screening Schedule.
(Roll Call Vote: Unanimous) BY B.Garza.
A. Consider a Resolution Rejecting General Plan Amendment Request No. 2019-02
to Change the General Plan Land Use Designation on 7.4 Acres of Property
Located at the Southeast Corner of Los Angeles Avenue and Beltramo Ranch
Road from Low Density Residential (L), High Density Residential (H) and Park
(P) to Very High Density Residential (VH) for Conceptual Development of a 69-
Unit Residential Project, on the Application of Jay Deckard (for Warmington
Group). Staff Recommendation: 1) Open the public hearing, accept public
testimony and close the public hearing; and 2) Uphold CEDC Recommendation
and Adopt Resolution No. 2021-3983 rejecting General Plan Amendment
Request No. 2019-02. (Staff: Shanna Farley-Judkins)
Item: 8.A.
MOORPARK CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA REPORT
TO: Honorable City Council
FROM: Shanna Farley-Judkins, Principal Planner
DATE: 01/06/2021 Regular Meeting
SUBJECT: Consider a Resolution Rejecting General Plan Amendment Request
No. 2019-02 to Change the General Plan Land Use Designation on 7.4
Acres of Property Located at the Southeast Corner of Los Angeles
Avenue and Beltramo Ranch Road from Low Density Residential (L),
High Density Residential (H) and Park (P) to Very High Density
Residential (VH) for Conceptual Development of a 69-Unit Residential
Project, on the Application of Jay Deckard (for Warmington Group)
BACKGROUND
Initial 102-Unit Proposal
On November 21, 2019, Jay Deckard for Warmington Group filed General Plan
Amendment (GPA) Pre-Screening Application No. 2019-02 proposing to change the
General Plan land use designation of 7.4 acres at the southeast corner of Los Angeles
Avenue and Beltramo Ranch Road, from Low Density Residential (L), High Density
Residential (H) and Park (P) to Very High Density Residential (VH) for the development
of a 102-unit attached residential condominium project and associated site
improvements, collectively referred to as “Beltramo Ranch”.
The GPA Pre-Screening request was originally scheduled for review by the Community
and Economic Development Committee (CEDC) (former Councilmember Mikos and
Councilmember Pollock) at their March 18, 2020, regular meeting. However, due to the
emerging coronavirus pandemic, all public meetings were cancelled. On May 13, 2020,
the City Council voted to allow the Warmington Group GPA Pre-Screening request to
proceed off-schedule from the normal cycle timelines per Resolution No. 2015-3466
(Attachment 1).
Item: 8.A.
1
The CEDC considered the application at a special meeting held on June 24, 2020,
(Attachment 2). The City received 54 comment letters: 47 generally opposed the
project and seven supported the project. At the CEDC meeting, 21 individuals spoke
during the public comment period. Concerns mostly revolved around the proposed very
high density designation with 13.8 dwelling units per acre (du/ac) compared to the
existing lower density of the adjacent Maureen Lane and Heatherglen neighborhoods.
Public speakers also noted concerns regarding traffic, proximity to existing residences,
access to the Arroyo Simi, proximity to floodplain, and general incompatibility with the
surrounding neighborhoods. The Heatherglen neighborhood to the west contains
single-family homes and duplexes with an overall density of 8.4 du/ac. The Maureen
Lane neighborhood to the east contains single-family homes with an overall density of
1.75 du/ac. The CEDC commented that the Project was not compatible with the
neighboring densities to the east and west and were concerned about aspects of the
conceptual design. The CEDC continued the item to their September 16, 2020, meeting
to provide the applicant with an opportunity to refine the proposal to address concerns
discussed at the meeting.
Following the June 24, 2020, CEDC meeting, the applicant conducted three in-person
and three virtual-online meetings with residents from adjacent neighborhoods to discuss
the project and receive community feedback.
Revised 69-Unit Proposal
On August 13, 2020, the applicant submitted a revised concept to address the concerns
expressed by the public and CEDC. The revised design was reduced to 69 units from
102 units, which represents a 32% reduction in the total units. The revised design has a
residential density of 9.3 du/ac as compared to the earlier proposed 13.8 du/ac. The
revised project features a mix of detached single-family homes (47) and attached
duplex homes (22), as compared to the earlier plan which consisted exclusively of
attached townhomes. This proposal was considered by the CEDC at a special meeting
held on September 16, 2020 (Attachment 3).
Staff received 74 comment letters and emails regarding the revised application
(included in Attachment 3). In general, 33 comments were in support of the application
and 45 comments were in opposition to the application. During public testimony, nine
members of the public spoke regarding the request. Comments in favor of the
application generally supported new housing and complimented the location and design
of the project. Comments in opposition to the application expressed concerns that the
project would be inconsistent with adjacent neighborhoods to the east and west.
Additional concerns were expressed regarding the proposed density, site design, as
well as the potential for parking and traffic impacts. The Committee considered the
revised 69-unit proposal and voted 2-0 to recommend that the City Council deny the
request to submit a formal GPA application. The motion included language to allow the
applicant to present a revised project to the full City Council that addresses the issues
2
raised at the meeting. Pursuant to City Council Resolution No. 2015-3466, “the City
Council CEDC recommendation regarding the requested amendment shall be
forwarded to the full Council for a decision on whether or not to accept an application for
amendment.” Although the CEDC motion included the opportunity to allow the applicant
to revise the project scope prior to the Council meeting, the process set forth by City
Council Resolution No. 2015-3466 requires the Council to consider the project that was
submitted to the CEDC and reviewed at the publicly noticed meeting of the Committee.
Therefore, the Council shall consider the request as presented to the CEDC on
September 16, 2020. Thus, Council’s consideration of the GPA pre-screening request
should focus on the 69-unit, 9.3 du/ac concept. Any other proposed design or request
would need to be submitted to the City for processing, consistent with the adopted
process. Lastly, should the Council act to reject the request to submit a GPA
application, no resubmittal of a similar application may be made for one (1) year after a
denial decision.
The City Council hearing to consider the Pre-Screening request was tentatively planned
for November 18, 2020; however, the item was ultimately scheduled for January 6,
2021. Due to a staff error, missing the legal notification deadline for the November 18,
2020, Council meeting, a later hearing date was required to provide adequate public
notification. Staff worked with the applicant to identify a mutually agreeable date to
present the application to the City Council.
DISCUSSION
Pursuant to Moorpark Municipal Code (MMC) Section 17.44.050(C) and Resolution
No. 2015-3466, requests to allow a general plan amendment application submittal shall
be reviewed by the City Council, following recommendation by the CEDC. The CEDC
recommendation regarding the requested amendment is forwarded to the full Council
for a decision on whether or not staff will be authorized to accept an application for
amendment to the General Plan. The pre-screening process allows the City Council to
consider individual requests to amend the General Plan before a formal application is
submitted.
While project-specific information may be provided in a conceptual manner to the CEDC
and City Council to understand how a future project might be designed, the purpose of
the pre-screening is to review the GPA request at a policy level. The question being
asked is whether the proposed use and density/intensity should be considered at the
location. GPA pre-screening is not intended to be an in-depth analysis of design,
architecture, infrastructure or environmental impacts. Those steps would occur during
the entitlement process, if the Council allows the application to proceed. If the Council
approves the acceptance of an application, it does not guarantee the approval of future
entitlements but simply gives the greenlight to allow design and analysis to begin.
3
PROPOSAL UNDER CONSIDERATION
The request for consideration by the City Council is the 69-unit, 9.3 du/ac concept,
which would require a General Plan land use designation of Very High (VH).
Project Setting
The project site consists of six lots that are owned by three property owners. These lots
are described below and on the following page:
• Assessor Parcel Number: 504-0-021-195
Address: Vacant (Beltramo Ranch Road)
The 2.59-acre lot is currently vacant.
• Assessor Parcel Numbers: 506-0-030-220, 506-0-030-210, 506-0-030-235, and
506-0-030-045
Address: 11930-11934 Los Angeles Avenue (International Church of the Four
Square Gospel)
The 3.49-acre site is currently developed with a 1,600 square-foot building
(church), 2,600 square-foot office trailer, and 700 square-foot classroom trailer.
Access to the community church is provided from Los Angeles Avenue.
• Assessor Parcel Number: 506-0-030-055
Address: 11944 Los Angeles Avenue
The 1.32-acre lot is currently developed with a 1,541 square-foot single-family
home. Ingress/egress to the home is secured by an easement over Beltramo
Ranch Road.
These lots would be merged to create a 7.4-acre site for the project development.
Adjacent land uses include single-family residential neighborhoods to the east and west;
industrial development to the north and a community park adjacent to a vacant lot to the
south of the site.
4
The following table summarizes the General Plan, zoning, and existing land uses on the
subject properties and within the vicinity of the project site.
Location Existing
Land Use
Existing
Zoning
Designation
Existing
General Plan
Land Use
Designation
Proposed
General Plan
Land Use
Designation
Site
Community
church, single-
family home,
and vacant road
Rural Exclusive
(RE-20) and
Single-Family
Residential (R-1)
Low Density
Residential (L),
High Density
Residential (H)
and Park (P)
Very High
Density
Residential (VH)
Area
L: 4.81 acres
H: 2.09 acres
P: 0.5 acre
Area
VH: 7.4 acres
North Industrial Buildings Limited Industrial
(M-1)
Medium
Industrial (l-2)
South
Single-family
homes
and community
park
Rural Exclusive
(RE-20) and
Open Space (O-S)
Low Density
Residential (L)
and Park (P)
East Single-family
homes
Rural Exclusive
(RE-20)
Low Density
Residential (L)
West Single-family
homes
Residential
Planned
Development
(RPD-8.4U)
High Density
Residential (H)
Existing General Plan Land Use Permitted Density
The maximum density allowed in the Low Density Residential (L) General Plan land use
designation is one du/ac, and seven du/ac in the High Density Residential (H) General
Plan land use designation. A total of 19 units could be permitted based upon the
density of the existing General Plan land use designations of the subject property
(overall density of 2.6 du/ac).
State law allows for additional units through various mechanisms, including Density
Bonus for projects with a percentage of affordable units, Accessory Dwelling Units
(ADU), and Junior ADU’s. Thus, a proposed project consistent with the existing
General Plan land use designation could exceed 19 units, dependent upon design and
affordability characteristics.
5
Proposed General Plan Land Use Designation and Density
The request would change the underlying General Plan land use designations from L
(maximum one du/ac), H (maximum seven du/ac), and Park (P) to Very High Density
Residential (VH). The requested land use designation of VH is intended for residential
development characterized by multiple-family attached units and apartment and
condominium buildings, with a maximum density of 15 du/ac. As described in the
General Plan, it is intended that sites with the VH land use designation utilize innovative
site planning, provide onsite recreational amenities and be located in close proximity to
major community facilities, business centers and major arterials.
The maximum density allowed in the VH designation is 15 du/ac, which would result in a
maximum of 111 units in the Project Site. The conceptual design includes 69 units,
which would equate to 9.3 du/ac. Through the Development Agreement process, the
total number of units, inclusive of affordable units, could be capped at a not-to-exceed
number of 69 units.
Site Layout
The conceptual site layout depicts a looped road which provides for increased setbacks
between existing neighboring residences and new homes. The loop road provides
approximately 50 to 60 feet between existing structures and new homes. Together, the
road and landscaping create both physical and visual separation between existing and
proposed development.
The conceptual site design reserves the whole of the approximately 45,000 square-foot,
“pan-handle” area, at the south end of project site, as a park. The application does not
define the specific layout or use of the park area. If the GPA pre-screening application
is acceptable to the City Council, the formal application for the development will include
more information about the proposed use and programming of any opens spaces
contained within the project.
Parking
Pursuant to MMC Section 17.32.020, a 69-unit project would require 138 garage
parking spaces. The conceptual design includes 220 parking spaces, of which 138
spaces would be within private garages, 47 spaces within private uncovered driveway
spaces and 35 uncovered guest parking spaces. As conceptually proposed, the project
exceeds the minimum parking requirements established by the Code with an additional
82 parking spaces provided in driveways and common areas.
6
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
The City Council’s decision regarding the GPA Pre-Screening application is not subject
to environmental review because it is not considered a Project, as defined by Section
15378 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and would have no potential
for resulting in either a direct physical change in the environment, or a reasonably
foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment. Should the City Council allow
the filing of a GPA application, an environmental analysis will be prepared for the
proposed project.
PUBLIC COMMENT
Following the September 16, 2020, CEDC meeting and prior to publication of this City
Council agenda report, three additional letters and emails have been submitted and are
included (Attachment 5).
FISCAL IMPACT
There are no fiscal impacts associated with this request.
COUNCIL GOAL COMPLIANCE
This action does not support a current strategic directive.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
1. Open the public hearing, accept public testimony and close the public hearing;
and
2. Uphold CEDC Recommendation and adopt Resolution No. 2021-____ rejecting
General Plan Amendment Request No. 2019-02 (Attachment 6).
COUNCIL ALTERNATIVE
Because of the policy nature of the GPA request, the City Council has broad discretion
to take any number of actions.
The Council could reject the CEDC recommendation and accept the request by
Warmington Group, which would allow the applicant to proceed with submitting a formal
entitlement application for the 69-unit development. A resolution authorizing the
acceptance of the Applicant’s request is included as Attachment 7.
The Council could also choose to allow an entitlement application to be submitted with a
different residential density, either higher or lower, than the current GPA request.
7
Should Council opt to take this course, amendments to Attachment 7 can be made to
capture the final direction.
Attachment 1: Resolution No. 2015-3466 – General Plan Amendment Pre-Screening
Process
Attachment 2: June 24, 2020, Community and Economic Development Committee
Agenda Report (with attachments)
Attachment 3: September 16, 2020, Community and Economic Development
Committee Agenda Report (with attachments)
Attachment 4: Conceptual Plans
Attachment 5: Public Comments, submitted following September 16, 2020 report
publication and prior to publication of this Agenda Report
Attachment 6: Draft Resolution Rejecting a 69-Unit Residential Development Project
Application
Attachment 7: Draft Resolution Accepting a 69-Unit Residential Development Project
Application
8
RESOLUTION NO. 2015-3466
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE CITY'S
GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT PRE-SCREENING
APPLICATION REVIEW PROCEDURE AND RESCINDING
RESOLUTION NO. 2013-3242
WHEREAS, on December 4, 2013, the City Council adopted Resolution No.
2013-3242, amending the City's General Plan Amendment Pre-Screening Application
Review Procedure; and
WHEREAS, the City Council wishes to amend this procedure by extending a time
period for which General Plan Amendment Pre-Screening application approvals filed
prior to December 4, 2013 are valid.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1 . Resolution No. 2013- 3242 is hereby rescinded.
SECTION 2. PRE-SCREENING PROCEDURE: The City Council hereby
amends the City's General Plan Amendment Pre-Screening Application Review
Procedure as shown in Exhibit A, attached.
SECTION 3. CERTIFICATION OF ADOPTION: The City Clerk shall certify to
the adoption of this resolution and shall cause a certified resolution to be filed in the
book of original resolutions.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 16th day of December, 2015.
ice S. Parvin, Mayor
ATTEST:
Maureen Benson, City Clerk
ni,.v vim
VI \Off
Exhibit A— General Plan Amendment Pre-Screening Application Review Procedure
ATTACHMENT 1
9
Resolution No. 2015-3466
Page 2
EXHIBIT A
GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT PRE-SCREENING APPLICATION
REVIEW PROCEDURE
PURPOSE:
To provide a pre-screening review procedure for property owners or their agents to
present information to the City Council related to proposals for amendments to the
General Plan.
APPLICATION:
An application for pre-screening must be submitted to the Community Development
Department on the Universal Application form along with appropriate accompanying
maps and materials required by the Community Development Department and a deposit
to process the application consistent with the adopted Council resolution. Application
materials may be obtained from the Community Development Department, Moorpark
City Hall, 799 Moorpark Avenue, Moorpark, California, 93021 or on the City's website at
www.moorparkca.gov.
SUBMITTAL CYCLES:
Two application submittal cycles are established in November and May for each
calendar year.
ACTION CYCLE I CYCLE2
Application Cycle Deadline November 30th May 31st
Application must be deemed
complete by this date)
Community and Economic Not later than the following Not later than the following
Development Committee March regular meeting September regular meeting
CEDC) Recommendation
City Council Public Hearing Not later than the second Not later than the second
and Decision regular meeting in May regular meeting in November
Except as provided below, all complete pre-screening applications are reviewed by the
standing City Council Community and Economic Development Committee. Notice of
the City Council Community and Economic Development Committee meetings for Pre-
Screening applications shall be provided consistent with notification for public hearings
required by Section 17.44.070 of the Municipal Code. The Committee recommendation
regarding the requested amendment shall be forwarded to the full Council for a decision
on whether or not to accept an application for amendment.
A Councilmember may request in writing within 30 days of the application cycle
deadline that the City Council conduct a public hearing on the General Plan Amendment
Pre-Screening application without review by the Community and Economic
Development Committee. Such request will be considered by the City Council within 60
days of the application cycle deadline.
10
Resolution No. 2015-3466
Page 3
A duly advertised and noticed public hearing shall be held by the City Council on the
pre-screening application to determine whether the Council decides to approve or deny
the filing of a formal application for amendment. The City Council decision shall be
made by resolution. In accordance with Section 17.44.060(D) of the Zoning Ordinance,
no resubmittal of a similar application may be made for one (1) year after a denial
decision.
City Council approvals of General Plan Amendment Pre-Screening applications are
valid for two (2) years from the date of approval, by which an application for a General
Plan Amendment along with all other required applications must be filed and deemed
complete, except that City Council approvals of General Plan Amendment Pre-
Screening applications approved prior to December 4, 2013 are valid to March 31,
2016, by which a complete application for a General Plan Amendment along with all
other required applications must be filed and deemed complete.
11
Resolution No. 2015-3466
Page 4
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF VENTURA ss.
CITY OF MOORPARK
I, Maureen Benson, City Clerk of the City of Moorpark, California, do hereby
certify under penalty of perjury that the foregoing Resolution No. 2015-3466 was
adopted by the City Council of the City of Moorpark at a regular meeting held on the
16th day of December, 2015, and that the same was adopted by the following vote:
AYES:Councilmembers Mikos, Millhouse, Pollock, Van Dam, and Mayor Parvin
NOES:None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None
WITNESS my hand and the official seal of said City this 7th day of January,
2016.
Maureen Benson, City Clerk
seal)
O vim,-_\
97/
om
aJ
AqT
O a`'
y
12
COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT STANDING COMMITTEE
AGENDA REPORT
TO: Community and Economic Development Standing Committee
(Councilmember Mikos and Councilmember Pollock)
FROM: Karen Vaughn, Community Development Director
By: Freddy A. Carrillo, Associate Planner ll
DATE: 06/24/2020 Special Meeting
SUBJECT: Consider General Plan Amendment Pre-Screening Application No.
2019-02 to Allow a General Plan Amendment Application to be Filed
to Change the Land Use Designation from Low Density Residential
(L) and High Density Residential (H) to Very High Density Residential
(VH) for the Development of a 102-Unit Residential Condominium
Project located on 7.4 Acres of Property at the Southeast Corner of
Los Angeles Avenue and Beltramo Ranch Road, on the Application
of Jay Deckard (for Warmington Group)
REQUEST
On November 21, 2019, Jay Deckard for Warmington Group filed a General Plan
Amendment Pre-Screening application to change the land use designation of 7.4 acres
of land at the southeast corner of Los Angeles Avenue and Beltramo Ranch Road from
Low Density Residential (L) and High Density Residential (H) to Very High Density
Residential (VH) for the development of a 102-unit residential condominium project and
associated site improvements, collectively referred to as “Beltramo Ranch”.
Resolution No. 2015-3466 establishes the review procedures for General Plan
Amendment Pre-Screening applications. Review and recommendation by the
Community and Economic Development Committee (CEDC) is required prior to a City
Council public hearing to determine whether or not a General Plan Amendment
application may be accepted for processing. Pre-Screening applications are reviewed
annually in two cycles, depending on the date of application submittal. This application
was submitted under the Cycle 1 timeframe, which required the CEDC to review and
make a recommendation no later than the March regular meeting.
Item: 4.A.
ATTACHMENT 2
13
Due to the coronavirus pandemic and local health emergency, the regular CEDC
meeting scheduled for March 18, 2020 was cancelled and staff was unable to meet the
Cycle 1 timeframe. However, on May 13, 2020, the City Council allowed the General
Plan Pre-Screening requested by Warmington Homes to move forward to the CEDC
and City Council off-schedule from the cycle timelines described in Resolution No.
2015-3466.
DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
Project Setting:
The overall project site consists of six lots that are owned by three property owners.
These lots are described below:
•Assessor Parcel Number: 504-0-021-195
Address: Vacant (Beltramo Ranch Road)
The 2.59-acre lot is currently vacant.
•Assessor Parcel Numbers: 506-0-030-220, 506-0-030-210, 506-0-030-235, and
506-0-030-045
Address: 11930-11934 Los Angeles Avenue (International Church of The Four
Square Gospel)
The 3.51-acre site is currently developed with a 1,600 square-foot building
(church), 2,600 square-foot office trailer, and 700 square-foot classroom trailer.
Access to the community church is provided from Los Angeles Avenue.
•Assessor Parcel Number: 506-0-030-055
Address: 11944 Los Angeles Avenue
The 1.32-acre lot is currently developed with a 1,541 square-foot single-family
home. Ingress/egress to the home is secured by an easement over Beltramo
Ranch Road.
These lots would be merged to create a 7.4-acre site for the project development
(described under the Proposed Development). Adjacent development and land uses
include single-family residential neighborhoods to the east and west; industrial
development to the north and a community park adjacent to a vacant lot to the south of
the site.
100-Year Flood Zone and Liquefaction Zone:
A portion of the project site is located within the 100-Year Flood Zone. In 2011, the City
successfully appealed to the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) to
revise the Digital Flood Insurance Rate Maps (DFIRM) by removing over 850 residential
and commercial properties from the 100-year flood zone. However, approximately 161
parcels, including APN: 504-0-021-195 (Beltramo Ranch Road), remain in the 100-year
14
flood zone. There are limitations regarding what can be constructed within areas of the
site that are designated as a regulatory floodway; however, the proposed use of the
property near the Arroyo Simi as a park does not conflict with the FEMA designations
over that portion of the property. Attachment D depicts the Special Flood Hazard Area
that is located in the southern portion of the project site and adjacent to Glenwood Park.
The project site is also located within a liquefaction zone, as is a good portion of the
city. Development is not precluded within liquefaction zones. A Geotech Report and
Soils Report would determine what construction methods and materials would be
required for a development to occur.
Previous Applications:
On September 8, 1987, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 87-152,
approving Conditional Use Permit No. 4508 for the construction of church facilities,
including a sanctuary and classrooms, on the southeast corner of Los Angeles Avenue
and Beltramo Ranch Road. The Council appealed the decision regarding the use of a
septic system in conjunction with the proposed church and day care center, and on
November 4, 1987, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 87-424, approving
Conditional Use Permit No. 4508 amending a condition of approval on the review of the
permit.
On May 26, 2005, the City received a Pre-Application for a conceptual residential
development of approximately 30 units on Beltramo Ranch Road. The application was
reviewed by the City’s Development Review Committee (DRC) and comments were
provided to the applicant on July 15, 2005. The applicant decided not to move forward
with the General Plan Amendment Pre-Screening application for the proposed project.
On April 19, 2019, the City received a Pre-Application for a conceptual residential
development of 112-unit multi-family workforce rental project located at 11930 and
11944 Los Angeles Avenue and Beltramo Ranch Road. The application was reviewed
by the DRC and comments were provided to the applicant on August 8, 2019. The
applicant decided not to move forward with the General Plan Amendment Pre-
Screening application for the proposed project.
A General Plan Amendment and Zone Change have not been previously proposed on
the proposed project site.
Proposed Development:
The proposed Project would include 102 residential condominiums, a 20,000+/- square-
foot neighborhood park and associated site improvements. The units would be provided
within 30 two-story buildings at a maximum of 30 feet high. Each unit would include a
two-car garage and the site would include 51 guest parking spaces dispersed
throughout. A detailed Project Summary is included in Attachment F. As designed, the
15
proposed residential and guest parking would comply with the off-street parking
requirements of the City Code. Two access points are provided by Los Angeles Avenue
and a pedestrian gate is proposed at the southeast corner of the site, connecting
through to Loretta Drive. The proposed park would be located on the south side of the
Project, adjacent to the existing Glenwood Park. The proposed Project would provide an
internal walkway system and private sidewalk linkages to surrounding local streets and
Glenwood Park.
The conceptual site plan was reviewed by the DRC on January 8, 2020. Comments
were provided by various agencies, including Ventura County Fire Protection Agency,
Parks, Landscaping, Community Services, and Waste Management. Concerns
regarding site accessibility in accordance with Ventura County Fire Protection District
access standards; landscape buffer; and waste/recycling collection services were
among the comments provided. Key comments have been addressed in the updated
plans.
While the conceptual plans provide context to evaluate the requested General Plan
Amendment, these plans will be refined if the project is allowed to proceed. The Pre-
Screening process provides an opportunity for the City Council to evaluate the
conceptual request, provide initial feedback to the Applicant, and determine whether or
not a General Plan Amendment application may be accepted for processing.
Existing and Proposed General Plan Land Use Designation:
The existing and proposed General Plan designations of the parcels are outlined on
Attachment A. The existing General Plan land use designation for parcel numbers
11930-11934 Los Angeles Avenue and 11944 Los Angeles Avenue is Low Density
Residential (L) and High Density Residential (H) for Beltramo Ranch Road. The Low
Density Residential designation allows for a maximum density of one unit per acre and
is characterized by single-family homes. The High Density Residential designation
allows for a maximum of seven units per acre and is intended for a wide range of
residential development types including attached and detached single-family units and
multiple-family attached units. Areas with this designation should exhibit adequate and
convenient access to local collector streets and be conveniently serviced by
neighborhood commercial and recreational facilities.
The Applicant is requesting to submit an application for a General Plan Amendment
(GPA) to change the land use designation of the properties to Very High Density
Residential (VH), which allows for a maximum density of 15 units per acre. The Very
High Density land use designation is intended for a wide range of residential
development characterized by multiple-family attached units, including apartment and
condominium buildings. It is intended that this category utilize innovative site planning,
provide onsite recreational amenities and be located in close proximity to major
community facilities, business centers and major arterials.
16
The conceptual Project proposes a gross density of 13.8 units per acre, with 15 units
(15%) deed restricted for low (51-80% of the area median income (AMI) and moderate
(81-120% AMI) income households. The Project’s ultimate affordable housing
requirements would be negotiated in the Development Agreement, if the GPA is
authorized.
Existing General Plan Land Use and Zoning Designations- Permitted Density:
The maximum density allowed in the Low Density Residential General Plan land use
designation is one dwelling unit per acre, and seven dwelling units per acre in the High
Density Residential General Plan land use designation. A total of 23 units could be
permitted based upon the density of the existing General Plan land use designations of
the subject property. The existing zoning designation for the site is Rural Exclusive (RE-
20) and Single-Family Residential (R-1). The Rural Exclusive zone allows a maximum
density of four units per gross acre, and seven units per gross acre in the Single-Family
Residential zone. A total of 38 units could be permitted on the property based upon the
current zoning designations; however, the density permitted by the General Plan
designations take precedent over the zoning, as the zoning is required to implement the
General Plan and be consistent with the General Plan designations.
The following table summarizes the permitted number of units allowed in the existing
General Plan land use and zoning designation of the project site.
Numbers of Units Permitted By
Existing General Plan Land
Designation
Number of Units Permitted By Existing
Zoning Designation
23 Units 38 Units
The following table summarizes the General Plan, zoning, and existing land uses on the
subject properties and within the vicinity of the project site.
Location Existing General
Plan Designation
Proposed
General Plan
Designation
Existing
Zoning
Designation
Existing
Land Use
Site
Low Density
Residential
(1DU/AC) and
High Density
Residential
(7DU/AC)
Very High
Density
Residential
(15DU/AC)
Rural
Exclusive
(RE-20) and
Single-Family
Residential
(R-1)
Community
church, single-
family home,
and vacant road
North Medium Industrial
(l-2)
Limited
Industrial
(M-1)
Industrial
Buildings
17
South
Low Density
Residential
(1DU/AC) and
Park (P)
Rural
Exclusive
(RE-20) and
Open Space
(O-S)
Single-family
homes
and community
park
East
Low Density
Residential
(1DU/AC)
Rural
Exclusive
(RE-20)
Single-family
homes
West
High Density
Residential
(7DU/AC)
Residential
Planned
Development
(RPD-8.4U)
Single-family
homes
General Plan Goal and Policy Analysis
The design of the Project is conceptual at this time; however, the following Goals and
Policies from the City’s General Plan are relevant to the project:
Land Use Element Goals and Policies:
•GOAL 1: Attain a balanced City growth pattern which includes a full mix of land
uses.
Policy 1.3: New residential development shall be consistent with City-adopted
growth ordinance policies.
•GOAL 3: Provide a variety of housing types and opportunities for all economic
segments of the community.
Policy 3.1: A mix of residential densities shall be provided which accommodates
the housing needs of all members of the community.
Policy 3.3: Where feasible, inclusionary zoning shall be used to require that a
percentage of new, private residential development be affordable to very low to
moderate income households.
•GOAL 5: Develop new residential housing which is compatible with the character
of existing individual neighborhoods and minimizes land use incompatibility.
Policy 5.2: Infill development in existing residential neighborhood shall be
compatible with the scale and character of the surrounding neighborhood.
18
Housing Element Goals and Policies:
• GOAL 2: Provide residential sites through land use, zoning and specific plan
designations to provide a range of housing opportunities.
Policy 2.2: Ensure residential sites have appropriate public services, facilities,
circulation, and other needed infrastructure to support development.
• GOAL 3: Expand and protect housing opportunities for lower income households
and special needs groups.
Policy 3.4: Require, in aggregate, 10% of new units to be affordable to lower-
income households. Establishing priority for usage of in-lieu fee is as follows: 1st
priority – production of affordable housing; 2nd priority – subsidy of affordable
housing; 3rd priority – housing rehabilitation; 4th priority – housing assistance;
and 5th priority – staffing costs.
• GOAL 4: Where appropriate, mitigate unnecessary governmental constraints to
the maintenance, improvement and development of housing.
Policy 4.3: Provide for streamlined, timely, and coordinated processing of
residential projects to minimize holding costs and encourage housing production.
Policy 4.4: Support infill development at suitable locations and provide, where
appropriate, incentives to facilitate such development.
In addition, to the Project’s ability to implement the various Goals and Policies of the
General Plan, the proposed General Plan Amendment could also facilitate additional
housing units required by the State Housing and Community Development Department
(HCD). A summary of the City’s current (5th Cycle, 2014-2021) Regional Housing
Needs Assessment (RHNA) obligation, remaining housing units, and the impacts of the
proposed development are outlined in the following table:
Housing Type RHNA Required
for 2014-2021
Moorpark
Cumulative Totals
5th cycle to date
Housing still
needed/required
by 2021
Beltramo Ranch
Preliminary
Proposal
Very Low Income 289 Units 15 Units 274 Units 0 Units
Low Income 197 Units 39 Units 158 Units 8 Proposed Units
Moderate 216 Units 11 Unit 205 Units 7 Proposed Units
Above Moderate 462 Units 518 Units 0 (Surplus of 56
Unit)
87 Proposed Units
Totals: 1,164 Units
Required
583 Total Unit
Permitted in
Moorpark 2014-
2019
637 Additional
Units Required
by 2021
102 Proposed
Units
19
Planning for the upcoming 6th RHNA Cycle (2021-2029) is well underway and the
RHNA allocation is subject to an appeal process before the numbers are finalized.
Preliminary 6th Cycle RHNA projections for Moorpark include 1,288 units, in addition to
the units allocated with the 5th Cycle.
PROCESSING TIME LIMITS FOR A GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT PRE-
SCREENING APPLICATION (CYCLE 1)
The General Plan Amendment Pre-Screening Application Review Procedures requires
the CEDC to make a recommendation to the City Council no later than the following
March regular meeting. A public hearing held by the City Council will need to occur no
later than the second regular meeting in May to determine whether or not a General
Plan Amendment application may be filed. However, due to the coronavirus pandemic
and local health emergency, the CEDC meeting scheduled for March 18, 2020 was
cancelled and the application was unable to meet the Cycle 1 timeframe. On May 13,
2020, the City Council allowed the General Plan Pre-Screening requested by the
applicant to move forward to the CEDC and City Council off-schedule from the normal
cycle timelines.
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
A GPA Pre-Screening application does not involve any approval action and is therefore
not subject to environmental review. Should the City Council allow the filing of a GPA
application, an environmental analysis will be prepared for the proposed project.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the Community and Economic Development Committee
recommend that the City Council authorize the filing of a General Plan Amendment
application for this project, subject to a Development Agreement and that all other
necessary entitlement applications be submitted concurrently.
ATTACHMENT A: Existing and Proposed General Plan Designation
ATTACHMENT B: Location Map
ATTACHMENT C: Aerial Map
ATTACHMENT D: Federal Emergency Management Agency Flood Zone Map
ATTACHMENT E: Project Plans
ATTACHMENT F: Warmington Group Project Narrative
20
ATTACHMENT A
EXISTING AND PROPOSED GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION
Existing Low
Density
Residential (L)
proposed to Very
High Density
Residential (VH)
Existing High Density
Residential (H)
Existing Low Density
Residential (L)
Existing High Density
Residential (H)
proposed to Very
High Density
Residential (VH)
Los Angeles Avenue
21
Location Map - Southeast Corner of Los Angeles Avenue and Beltramo Road
ATTACHMENT B
E Los Angeles Ave E Los Angeles Ave
@)
itrcrttk Rd
... ..
3
.% ..
"' a.
-;
it Court-Ln =I ._,
.. 1
1 ~ .. .. a. .. .. > < ::0 • a.
+
HarvtSltrSt
1"=37 6ft
Glenwood
Park
GPA Pre-Sc reening
.<: g ..
~'--~
~
~
• W Los Angeles Ave
3: ..
!i ----:----1
~
!;"
Loretta 'Dr
• 03/12/2020 ·-$:
> ft
Thisma11i\l':rrmesentm vi suald isplf.)Of re !ated;jeog raphirinformationData providedhe<eon is not guaranteoof acutuaJieldconditionsT obe sureof completmccuracypleasecontacllhe
respons1 a ormostup t oda te1n ormanon. 22
Aerial Map - Southeast Corner of Los Angeles Avenue and Beltramo Road
ATTACHMENT C
1"=376ft GPA Pre-Screening
Thisma11mayre!llesentm vi suald ispli!)Of re!ated;jeographi<informationData provide<fle<eon is not gua ra nteoof acutuaJieldconditionsT obe sureof completmccuracypleasecontacllhe
respons1blstamorm ostup toda te1ntormat1on. 23
ATTACHMENT D
Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Special Flood
Hazard Area
Los Angeles Avenue
Site
24
W LOS ANGELES AVETIERRA REJADA RDGLENWOOD PARKSITEPROJECTMAUREEN LANELORETTA DRIVEELDERBERRY AVENUEArchitecture + Planning17911 Von Karman Ave,Suite 200Irvine, CA 92614949.851.2133ktgy.comPlot Date:BELTRAMO RANCHMOORPARK, CA # 2018-0860BELTRAMO RANCHM O O R P A R K , C A L I F O R N I ADEVELOPER:WARMINGTON RESIDENTIAL3090 PULLMAN STREETCOSTA MESA, CA 92626714.434.4439ARCHITECT:KTGY ARCHITECTURE + PLANNING17911 VON KARMAN AVENUE, STE 200IRVINE, CA 92614949.851.2133PREPARED FOR: COMMUNITY & ECONOMICDEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE(CEDC)PROJECT TEAMVICINITY MAP NTSARCHITECTURALA0.0 SHEET INDEXA1.0 CONCEPTUAL SITE PLANA1.1 CIRCULATION EXHIBITA1.2 TRASH COLLECTION EXHIBITA1.3 CONCEPTUAL PARK AMENITIESA2.0 IMAGE BOARDA3.0 CONCEPTUAL ELEVATIONA4.0 SAMPLE FLOOR PLAN 1A4.1 SAMPLE FLOOR PLAN 2A4.2 SAMPLE FLOOR PLAN 3A4.3 SAMPLE FLOOR PLAN FEBRUARY 26, 2020Warmington Residential3090 Pullman StreetCosta Mesa, CA 92626AB3"55"$).&/5&25
A1.0- "Very High Density:"*Conceptual Site Plan is compliant with R-2 zoning, standards,however project is seeking RPD zoning and Very High Density Residential.26
A1.112345678111213141516171819202123222425272891030292627
A1.212345678111213141516171819202123222425272891030292628
A1.3FEBRUARY 26, 202029
Architecture + Planning17911 Von Karman Ave,Suite 200Irvine, CA 92614949.851.2133ktgy.comPlot Date:Warmington Residential3090 Pullman StreetCosta Mesa, CA 92626BELTRAMO RANCHMOORPARK, CA # 2018-0860SCALE: NTSA2.0FEBRUARY 26, 202030
Architecture + Planning17911 Von Karman Ave,Suite 200Irvine, CA 92614949.851.2133ktgy.comPlot Date:Warmington Residential3090 Pullman StreetCosta Mesa, CA 92626BELTRAMO RANCHMOORPARK, CA # 2018-0860SCALE: NTS9'-1"9'-1"±30'-0"9'-1"9'-1"±30'-0"A3.0FEBRUARY 26, 202031
M. BEDROOMD11'-9" x 13'-0"W.I.C.M. BATHMBATHMMMMBED 210'-0" x 11'-0"BATH 2BATH 2AAAAAABED 310'-0" x 11'-0"LAUNDRYLAUNDRYLLLLRRRR8'-6"86 x x6'-8"6847'-2"13'-5"7'-7"21'-0"17RDNTECHHLINENNLOFT8'-10" x 8'-6"1'-0"1'-2"49'-4"DBLSHELVESVKITCHENKITCHENHHHHHHCCTCGREAT ROOMGREAT ROOMOOOOOOAAAA20'-4"20' 4" x 12'-10"12' 10"2-CAR GARAGE20'-4" x 20'-2"TANKLESSSSSSSSSTW.H.W47'-4"21'-0"A/CT20'-4"17RRRR7UPPPPPPOWDERWDERDDDWOOOOWPOOOOOOOWWOOWOOOENTRYENTRYNNTTNN1'-0"49'-4"1'-0"PRIVATEPATIO(PER LANDSCAPE)()150SF MIN.10'-2"10'-10"21'-0"SAMPLE FLOOR PLAN 0A4.FEBRUARY 26, 202001 +\- 1400SF32
KITCHENKITCHENKITCHENTHHKKLIVING ROOMLIVING ROOMIIMMMVMRRRR12'-0"12' 0"0000 x x14'-4"14' 4"44POWDERPOWDERRDDDDDDDDWWWWRDEDDDWDOPERRERRE2-CAR GARAGEG23'-6"36 x 20'-0"UTILITY CLOSETEWHERE OCCURSRPER SITECOATSDININGDININGDININGNNGG12'-0"12 0-00 x x12'-8"12 810'-10"1'-0"25'-10"20'-4"27'-8"6"23'-6"20'-0"12'-8"11'-8"1'-0"25'-4"17R17RUPUPPANTRY6"6"1'-2"1'-2"51'-2"13'-6"20'-10 1/2"A/C1'-0"PRIVATEPATIO(PER LANDSCAPE)()150SF MIN.MASTER BED11'-10" x 14'-4"W.I.C.MASTER BATHMASTER BATHAAHHAHAHMMAAAAMMAABED 210'-6" x 11'-2"LAUNDRYLAUNDRYUUUURRRRYY8'-4"8-4 x x6'-6"6-6666BED 310'-4" x 10'-4"BATH 2BATH 2BBBB2222LOFT / OPT. BED 413'-6" x 10'-10"10'-10"25'-10"1'-0"12'-8"17RDNLINENTECH1'-6"25'-10"11'-8"6"1'-0"14'-5"13'-3"21'-4"1'-2"51'-2"13'-6"KITCHENKITCHENKITCHENHHKKKKKLIVING ROOMLIVING ROOMIIMMMVMRRRR12'-0"12' 0"0000 x x14'-4"14' 4"44POWDERPOWDERPPPPRRRRRRWWW2-CAR GARAGEG23'-6"36 x 20'-0"COATSDININGDININGDININGNNGG12'-0"12 0-0000 x x12'-8"12 810'-10"1'-0"25'-10"20'-4"27'-8"6"A/C23'-6"20'-0"12'-8"12'-2"6"25'-4"17R17RUPUPPANTRY6"6"1'-0"1'-2"51'-2"13'-6"UTILITY CLOSETWHERE OCCURSRPER SITE20'-10 1/2"PRIVATEPATIO(PER LANDSCAPE)()150SF MIN.SAMPLE FLOOR PLAN0A4.FEBRUARY 26, 202012 +\- 1750SF33
0SAMPLE FLOOR PLAN A4.FEBRUARY 26, 20203A +\- 1600SF234
0SAMPLE FLOOR PLAN A4.FEBRUARY 26, 20203B +\- 1600SF335
1
BELTRAMO
RANCH
-‐
MOORPARK
PROJECT
SUMMARY
SHEET
The
proposed
“BELTRAMO
RANCH”
project
provides
for
a
new
Moorpark
residential
community
to
be
developed
on
a
7.4-‐acre
site.
Project
development
requires
the
relocation
and/or
demolition
of
existing
buildings
and
site
grading/improvements
to
prepare
the
site
for
land
development.
The
Beltramo
Ranch
project
is
comprised
of
the
following
two
development
components:
Beltramo
Ranch
Residential
Component.
The
project
includes
a
non-‐gated
residential
neighborhood,
consisting
of
102
for-‐sale
townhouse
units
(see
Conceptual
Site
Plan
dated
2.26.2020).
RESIDENTIAL
PROJECT
PLAN
SUMMARY
Unit
Plan
Type
Square
Footage
Total
Units
Plan
1:
3-‐Bdrm/2.5
Bath
+/-‐
1,400
SF
27
Plan
2:
4-‐Bdrm/2.5
Bath
+/-‐
1,750
SF
36
Plan
3:
3-‐Bdrm/2.5
Bath
+/-‐
1,600
SF
39
Total
102
Units
Note:
Plan
1
Units
are
Front-‐Loaded
Townhomes,
Plans
2/3
are
Rear-‐Loaded
Townhomes
The
project
will
be
on
one
lot,
through
a
Vesting
Tentative
Tract
Map
for
condominium
purposes.
The
Development
Plan
provides
for
fifteen
affordable
units
(15%
of
the
total
project
units)
to
be
sold
to
qualifying,
low
and
moderate-‐income
residents.
The
plan
proposes
a
mix
of
eight
low-‐income
units
and
seven
moderate-‐income
units.
The
proposed
architectural
style
for
the
townhomes
incorporates
a
traditional
Spanish-‐
style
(see
Image
Board).
Spanish
architectural
features
have
been
implemented
into
the
overall
plan
to
provide
attractive,
authentic
details,
including
the
following:
¥White
Stucco
with
Red
"S"
Tile
Roof
¥Wood
and
Metal
Decor
¥Faux
Chimneys
¥Recessed
Doors
&
Windows
These
three
and
four
bedroom
homes
feature
efficiently
designed
living
spaces
with
kitchens
on
the
first
level
and
bedrooms
on
the
second
level.
Each
home
includes
two
and
one-‐half
bathrooms.
The
builder
will
employ
green
building
techniques
to
provide
for
energy
efficient
homes,
well-‐balanced
and
integrated
site
lighting,
and
drought-‐
tolerant
native
landscaping.
Beltramo
Ranch
Amenities/Open
Space
Component.
The
project
offers
over
70,000
square
feet
of
combined
open
"green
space"
located
throughout
the
project
site.
This
open
space
concept
provides
for
passive
gathering
spaces
for
use
by
Beltramo
Ranch
ATTACHMENT F
36
2
residents
and
guests.
The
project
also
provides
an
internal
walkway
system
and
private
sidewalk
linkages
to
surrounding
local
streets
and
Glenwood
Park,
a
local
neighborhood
City
park.
A
dog
park,
park
area,
and
barbeque/picnic
areas
are
proposed
at
the
southern
end
of
the
site,
adjacent
to
Glenwood
Park.
Applicant:
Warmington
Residential
3090
Pullman
Street
C osta
Mesa,
California
92626
Project
Setting:
The
project
is
located
on
generally
the
west
end
of
the
City
of
Moorpark
at
the
southeast
corner
of
West
Los
Angeles
Avenue
and
Beltramo
Ranch
Road.
The
site
consists
of
six
parcels,
identified
as
assessor’s
parcel
numbers
504-‐0-‐021-‐195,
506-‐0-‐
030-‐220,
506-‐0-‐030-‐210,
506-‐0-‐030-‐235,
506-‐0-‐030-‐235,
and
506-‐0-‐030-‐055.
The
combined
acreage
for
the
all
project
parcels
is
7.4
acres.
Existing/
Proposed
Zoning:
Residential
(R-‐1,
R-‐20)/
Residential
Planned
Development
(RPD)
Existing/Proposed
General
Plan
Designation:
Residential
(Combination
of
Low
Density
and
High
Density)/Very
High
Density
Existing
Uses:
Community
Church
Facilities;
Single-‐Family
Home,
Beltramo
Ranch
Road
Site
Access:
State
Route
118
is
the
primary
east-‐west
access
route
serving
the
City
of
Moorpark
and
the
subject
site.
In
Moorpark,
the
118
connects
at
the
intersection
of
State
Route
23
in
eastern
Moorpark.
State
Route
23
is
the
primary
north-‐south
access
route
to
Moorpark.
The
118
is
also
known
as
West
Los
Angeles
Avenue
and
is
contiguous
to
the
project's
northern
site
boundary.
Local
street
access
to
the
project
site
will
be
provided
via
a
new
private
loop
street.
The
new
in-‐tract
street
will
be
designated
a
local
roadway
and
will
provide
direct
entry
to
the
project
with
ingress
and
egress
at
the
primary
driveway
and
egress
at
the
secondary
driveway.
A
pedestrian
gate
is
proposed
at
the
southeast
corner
of
the
site,
connecting
through
Loretta
Drive.
Building
Coverage:
Proposed
building
coverage
is
35%,
which
is
well
under
the
50%
maximum
allowable
standard.
Setbacks:
Setbacks
comply
with
the
City's
R-‐2
zone
development
standards.
37
3
Parking:
Each
unit
will
provide
two
garage
parking
spaces
and
guest
surface
parking
spaces
for
a
total
of
2.5
spaces
per
unit.
There
are
a
total
of
204
garage
spaces
and
51
surface
(guest)
parking
spaces.
Guest
parking
spaces
are
9'
x
20'.
Project
Approval
Requests:
Development
of
the
Beltramo
Ranch
project
will
require
the
following
City
approvals:
¥General
Plan
Amendment
&
Zone
Change
¥Vesting
Tentative
Tract
Map
¥Development
Agreement
As
mandated
by
State
law,
the
project
is
subject
to
the
California
Environmental
Quality
Act
(CEQA)
statute.
The
CEQA
environmental
review
imposes
both
procedural
and
substantive
requirements,
with
the
City
of
Moorpark
designated
as
the
lead
agency.
Other
discretionary
agency
permits
(such
as
RWQCB,
CDFW,
ACOE)
may
be
required,
as
determined
through
the
project
approval
process.
38
SUPPLEMENTAL
COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT STANDING COMMITTEE
SUPPLEMENTAL
AGENDA REPORT
TO: Community and Economic Development Standing Committee
(Councilmember Mikos and Councilmember Pollock)
FROM: Karen Vaughn, Community Development Director
By: Freddy A. Carrillo, Associate Planner ll
DATE: 06/24/2020 Special Meeting
SUBJECT: Consider General Plan Amendment Pre-Screening Application No.
2019-02 to Allow a General Plan Amendment Application to be Filed
to Change the Land Use Designation from Low Density Residential
(L) and High Density Residential (H) to Very High Density Residential
(VH) for the Development of a 102-Unit Residential Condominium
Project located on 7.4 Acres of Property at the Southeast Corner of
Los Angeles Avenue and Beltramo Ranch Road, on the Application
of Jay Deckard (for Warmington Group)
CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Subsequent to the preparation of the staff report, the following correspondence was
received from members of the public.
Attachments
Item: 4.A.
39
June 1, 2020
Brian & Mary Berry
Moorpark, CA 93021
City of Moorpark
Community Development Department
Community and Economic Development Standing Committee
799 Moorpark Ave .
Moorpark, CA 93021
RE: Letter of Objection -General Plan Amendment Pre-Screening Application
No. 2019-02
Councilmembers Mikos & Pollock:
After reading the Community and Economic Development Standing Committee
Agenda Report attached to agenda for the committee's meeting scheduled for
Wednesday, March 18, 2020, we were shocked and very concerned by the
details of the project and the pro-developer bias inherent in the report. The
developer is proposing to )llfedge a Very High Density Residential (VH)
development called Beltramo Ranch in between a Low Density Residential (L)
area in the Maureen Lane area and a High Density (H) are of Heather Glen HOA.
There is no mention at all of the impact this incredibly dense development will
have on the communities it is jammed between .
The Warmington development is not consistent with either of the existing
communities and does not take into consideration the quality of life that the
residents of both Heather Glen and Mauree n Lane have long enjoyed. The
residents of Maureen Lane purchased their homes because of the Low-Density
and Rural zoning that allows them to keep horses, chickens and other animals
that are part of a rural lifestyle. That lifestyle will be obliterated by a high
density development jammed up right n ext to it.
The resid ents of Hea the r Glen will also be adve r se ly affected by the addition of
so many people crammed in such a small area. Those of us who live on the east
side of Elderberry Avenue will especially experience the negative impact of this
development. The Warmington condos will be built next to and higher than our
backyards, blocking sunlight and allowing our new neighbors to easily see into
our yard s and homes. Our privacy will disappea r. Most of us bought our homes
in that location be caus e they abutted l and th at ga v e us a sen se of op e n sp ace
and privacy. None of us expected it to be rezoned!
40
From:Pam Peake
To:David Pollock; Roseann Mikos
Cc:Douglas Spondello; Karen Vaughn; Freddy Carrillo
Subject:General Plan Amendment Pre-Screeningfor proposed Beltramo Ranch Community
Date:Tuesday, June 16, 2020 3:55:57 PM
Honorable Councilmembers Mikos and Pollock:
I am a resident of Moorpark and I am writing in response to the proposed Beltramo Ranch
Community on Los Angeles Avenue.
I want to express my support for this building project.
I am happy to hear that this project name reflects the environment of the area.
I believe this community can be an asset to Moorpark and the neighborhood by reflecting a
rural ranch type of area for people to live in and be a part of.
It would be a great asset to the surrounding neighborhood, if it contained a horse trail or
community garden in which those who already have a lifestyle of rural ranch living could also
be included in this plan.
It would also add to unity amongst communities, and help to ease fears of a way of life with
rural ranch living being eliminated.
People are drawn to the beauty of this community and the picturesque hills and open land.
I believe this project can add to that by taking the current property and transforming it into a
beautiful area to live, amongst a lovely rural designed setting.
Sincerely,
Pamela Peake
Moorpark, CA 93021
41
From:Reggie Mercado
To:David Pollock; Roseann Mikos
Cc:Douglas Spondello; Karen Vaughn; Freddy Carrillo
Subject:General Plan Amendment Pre-Screening Application No. 2019-02
Date:Tuesday, June 16, 2020 3:35:47 PM
Reggie Mercado
Moorpark, CA 93021
June 16, 2020
Moorpark Community & Economic Development Standing Committee
Councilmember Mikos and Councilmember Pollock
799 Moorpark Avenue
Moorpark, CA 93021
Re: General Plan Amendment Pre-Screening for Proposed Beltramo Ranch Community
Honorable Councilmembers Mikos and Pollock:
As a Moorpark resident I want to express my support for the proposed Beltramo Ranch
community. The proposed community offers the City of Moorpark many economic benefits
much needed in the city including: entry level for-sale housing, increased property and sales
tax, and shoppers/diners to support our stores and restaurants along Los Angeles Avenue.
Additionally, 15% of the homes will be made available to affordable for-sale buyers. This
proposed development is the right solution for the area and fits well with the adjacent uses.
For all of these reasons I support the redevelopment of property into the proposed Beltramo
Ranch community.
Sincerely,
Reggie Mercado
42
SUPPLEMENTAL
COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT STANDING COMMITTEE
SUPPLEMENTAL
AGENDA REPORT
TO: Community and Economic Development Standing Committee
(Councilmember Mikos and Councilmember Pollock)
FROM: Karen Vaughn, Community Development Director
By: Freddy A. Carrillo, Associate Planner ll
DATE: 06/24/2020 Special Meeting
SUBJECT: Consider General Plan Amendment Pre-Screening Application No.
2019-02 to Allow a General Plan Amendment Application to be Filed
to Change the Land Use Designation from Low Density Residential
(L) and High Density Residential (H) to Very High Density Residential
(VH) for the Development of a 102-Unit Residential Condominium
Project located on 7.4 Acres of Property at the Southeast Corner of
Los Angeles Avenue and Beltramo Ranch Road, on the Application
of Jay Deckard (for Warmington Group)
CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Subsequent to the preparation of the staff report, the following correspondence was
received from members of the public between June 22 – June 24, 2020.
Attachments
Item: 4.A.
43
From:Ann Marie Brummond
To:Planning
Subject:"Opposition to General Plan Amendment for Beltramo Ranch"
Date:Sunday, June 21, 2020 9:00:54 PM
June 21, 2020
Moorpark Community & Economic Development Standing Committee
Councilmembers Roseann Mikos and David Pollack
799 Moorpark Avenue
Moorpark, CA 93021
Re. General Plan Amendment Application for Proposed Beltramo Ranch Community
Honorable Councilmembers Roseann Mikos and David Pollack:
I am writing to express my deep concern about the proposed Warmington development on Los
Angeles Avenue between my HOA, Heather Glen, and the community around Maureen Lane.
Amending the Land Use Designation of the General Plan to shoe-horn this 102-unit development
into just 7.4 acres will irreversibly impact the quality of life for two long-time communities.
There are several reasons this project should not be permitted to move forward. Here are a
couple of the most concerning:
1. VIOLATION OF ELEMENT GOAL #5 and POLICY #5.2 FROM THE GENERAL PLAN
Both of the communities adjacent to the proposed development have long enjoyed the rural
character of this edge of Moorpark. People in the Maureen Lane community own horses and
other farm animals that will be traumatized by both the building process and the subsequent
proximity to such a densely populated area. We in Heather Glen appreciate being next to a rural
community that reminds us of Moorpark’s roots. For some of us, it’s the reason we chose this
location to buy our homes.
Granted, Heather Glen is designated High Density, but our community has little impact on the
Maureen Lane community because we are separated from each other by a wide swath of land
that includes Beltramo Ranch Road. This separation of residential from rural would be wiped out
by the Warmington development.
The clash between existing communities and the High Density Warmington development makes
the “new residential houses [in]compatible with the character of existing individual
neighborhoods.” It is also incompatible “with the scale and character of the surrounding
neighborhood.”
2. INCREASED TRAFFIC ON ALREADY CONGESTED #118
Another very serious concern is related to increased traffic. The backup at the intersection of Los
Angeles Avenue and Tierra Rejada is terrible at certain times of the day. This will only become
much worse once the already-approved 369-unit housing development on the east side of the
44
Maureen Lane community is built. To add several hundred MORE cars to that juncture will be a
nightmare.
3. INVASION OF PRIVACY AND BLOCKED SUNLIGHT FOR RESIDENTS OF ELDERBERRY
AVENUE
As the Warmington plan is currently envisioned, the new condos will be lined up just a few feet
from the back walls of the homes on the east side of Elderberry Avenue. The Beltramo units will
be several feet higher than the Elderberry Avenue homes and about 30’ tall, affording an easy
view into the bedroom and living area windows of those homes and blocking much needed
morning sunlight to plants and gardens in their back yards.
4. OVERCROWDING OF MOORPARK HIGH SCHOOL
How can the high school accommodate the large number of additional students that will come
from two large new developments when the school is
currently at capacity with over 2000 students? (Let’s not even talk about COVID-19 social
distancing!)
As a citizen of Moorpark who loves this community and especially cherishes the ambiance and
character of the neighborhood I live in here, I urge the Committee and the Council to not approve
the General Plan Amendment requested by the Warmington Group. If the project appeals to you,
please find another parcel where it won’t impact the quality of life of people who have chosen
their homes for that very quality of life.
Thank you,
Ann-Marie and Lee Brummond
4856 Penrose Avenue
Moorpark, Ca.
45
June 22, 2020
Moorpark Community & Economic Development Standing Committee
Councilmembers Roseann Mikos and David Pollack
799 Moorpark Avenue
Moorpark, CA 93021
Re. General Plan Amendment Application for Proposed Beltramo Ranch Community
Honorable Councilmembers Roseann Mikos and David Pollack:
I am writing to express my deep concern about the proposed Warmington development on Los
Angeles Avenue between my HOA, Heather Glen, and the community around Maureen Lane.
Amending the Land Use Designation of the General Plan to shoe-horn this 102-unit development
into just 7.4 acres will irreversibly impact the quality of life for two long-time communities.
There are several reasons this project should not be permitted to move forward. Here are a couple
of the most concerning:
1. VIOLATION OF ELEMENT GOAL #5 and POLICY #5.2 FROM THE GENERAL PLAN
Both of the communities adjacent to the proposed development have long enjoyed the rural
character of this edge of Moorpark. People in the Maureen Lane community own horses and other
farm animals that will be traumatized by both the building process and the subsequent proximity to
such a densely populated area. We in Heather Glen appreciate being next to a rural community that
reminds us of Moorpark’s roots. For some of us, it’s the reason we chose this location to buy our
homes.
Granted, Heather Glen is designated High Density, but our community has little impact on the
Maureen Lane community because we are separated from each other by a wide swath of land that
includes Beltramo Ranch Road. This separation of residential from rural would be wiped out by the
Warmington development.
The clash between existing communities and the High Density Warmington development makes the
“new residential houses [in]compatible with the character of existing individual neighborhoods.” It is
also incompatible “with the scale and character of the surrounding neighborhood.”
2. INCREASED TRAFFIC ON ALREADY CONGESTED #118
Another very serious concern is related to increased traffic. The backup at the intersection of Los
Angeles Avenue and Tierra Rejada is terrible at certain times of the day. This will only become much
worse once the already-approved 369-unit housing development on the east side of the Maureen
Lane community is built. To add several hundred MORE cars to that juncture will be a nightmare.
3. INVASION OF PRIVACY AND BLOCKED SUNLIGHT FOR RESIDENTS OF ELDERBERRY
AVENUE
As the Warmington plan is currently envisioned, the new condos will be lined up just a few feet from
the back walls of the homes on the east side of Elderberry Avenue. The Beltramo units will be
several feet higher than the Elderberry Avenue homes and about 30’ tall, affording an easy view into
the bedroom and living area windows of those homes and blocking much needed morning sunlight
to plants and gardens in their back yards.
4. OVER-CROWDING OF MOORPARK HIGH SCHOOL
How can the high school accommodate the large number of additional students that will come from
two large new developments when the school is
46
currently at capacity with over 2000 students? (Let’s not even talk about COVID-19 social
distancing!)
As a citizen of Moorpark who loves this community and especially cherishes the ambiance and
character of the neighborhood I live in here, I urge the Committee and the Council to not approve the
General Plan Amendment requested by the Warmington Group. If the project appeals to you, please
find another parcel where it won’t impact the quality of life of people who have chosen their homes
for that very quality of life.
Thank you,
Brian & Mary Berry
4802 Elderberry Ave.
Moorpark, CA 93021
47
From:Brita Murphy
To:Planning
Cc:MurphysHouse2@gmail.com
Subject:Beltramo Ranch - Opposition to General Plan Amendment
Date:Monday, June 22, 2020 12:52:33 AM
June 23rd, 2020
Moorpark Community & Economic Development Standing Committee
Council-member Roseann Mikos
Council-member David Pollack
799 Moorpark Avenue
Moorpark, CA 93021
Re. General Plan Amendment Application for Proposed Beltramo Ranch Community
Honorable Council-members Roseann Mikos and David Pollack:
I am writing to express my deep concern about the proposed Warmington development on Los
Angeles Avenue between my house on Elderberry Avenue in the Heather Glen HOA, and the
community around Maureen Lane. Amending the Land Use Designation of the General Plan to
shoe-horn this 102-unit development into just 7.4 acres will irreversibly impact the quality of life for
two long-time communities.
I am the owner of one of the properties directly adjacent to your proposed development. My
house is on the Eastern side Elderberry Avenue. I fear your two-story 5-unit building will be only
a few feet from my upstairs windows. The proposed construction will be higher than my
property, therefore blocking the sun and my current view of the church and the land beyond. I
also fear the noise and activities of large number of residents will adversely impact the peace
and quiet of my property. My son and grandchildren enjoy living here and this is their home for
some 15 years. I share with others the many other reasons this project should not be permitted to
move forward. Here are a couple of the most concerning:
1. VIOLATION OF ELEMENT GOAL #5 and POLICY #5.2 FROM THE GENERAL PLAN
Both of the communities adjacent to the proposed development have long enjoyed the rural
character of this edge of Moorpark. People in the Maureen Lane community own horses and other
farm animals that will be traumatized by both the building process and the subsequent proximity to
such a densely populated area. We in Heather Glen appreciate being next to a rural community that
reminds us of Moorpark’s roots. For some of us, it’s the reason we chose this location to buy our
homes.
Granted, Heather Glen is designated High Density, but our community has little impact on the
Maureen Lane community because we are separated from each other by a wide swath of land that
includes Beltramo Ranch Road. This separation of residential from rural would be wiped out by the
Warmington development.
48
The clash between existing communities and the High Density Warmington development makes the
“new residential houses [in]compatible with the character of existing individual neighborhoods.” It
is also incompatible “with the scale and character of the surrounding neighborhood.”
2. INCREASED TRAFFIC ON ALREADY CONGESTED #118
Another very serious concern is related to increased traffic. The backup at the intersection of Los
Angeles Avenue and Tierra Rejada is terrible at certain times of the day. This will only become much
worse once the already-approved 369-unit housing development on the east side of the Maureen
Lane community is built. To add several hundred MORE cars to that juncture will be a nightmare.
3. INVASION OF PRIVACY AND BLOCKED SUNLIGHT FOR RESIDENTS OF ELDERBERRY AVENUE
As the Warmington plan is currently envisioned, the new condos will be lined up just a few feet
from the back walls of the homes on the east side of Elderberry Avenue where my property is
located. The Beltramo units will be several feet higher than the Elderberry Avenue homes and
about 30’ tall, affording an easy view into the bedroom and living area windows of those homes
and blocking much needed morning sunlight to plants and gardens in their back yards.
As a property owner in Moorpark who loves this community and especially cherishes the ambiance
and character of the neighborhood, I strongly urge the Committee and the Council to not
approve the General Plan Amendment requested by the Warmington Group. If the project appeals
to you, please find another parcel where it won’t impact the quality of life of people who have
chosen their homes for that very quality of life, or approve it for a less dense development.
Sincerely,
Brita Murphy
4880 Elderberry Avenue, Heather Glen HOA
Moorpark 93021
BritaWolffram@yahoo.com
Cc: Michael Murphy, 4880 Elderberry Avenue, 93021
Sent from Mail for Windows 10
49
June 21, 2020
Councilmember Mikos
Councilmember Pollock
Moorpark City Hall
799 Moorpark Ave.
Moorpark, CA 93021
Re: Approve Beltramo Ranch – Moorpark Community and Economic
Development Standing Committee
Dear Councilmember Mikos & Councilmember Pollock:
The Los Angeles/Ventura Chapter of the Building Industry Association of
Southern California, Inc. (BIASC-LAV), is a non-profit trade association of
nearly 1,200 companies employing over 100,000 people all affiliated
with building housing for all. On behalf of our membership, we would
like to express our support for the approval of Warmington Group’s
residential condominium project, Beltramo Ranch. This development
will provide homeownership opportunities for many residents and
families within the City of Moorpark.
Currently, California is facing one of the most drastic housing shortages
in the nation. A recent McKinsey Global Institute report estimated that
the State needs 3.5 million units of housing to fill this gap. As projected
by the Regional Housing Needs Assessment (RHNA), the City of
Moorpark, will be responsible for creating nearly 1,300 new housing
units by 2029. Beltramo Ranch would provide 102 residential
condominiums of much needed housing. Every new unit of housing in
the City is helpful in meeting this goal. The project also addresses the
affordability shortfall. In addition to market-rate housing, the
Warmington project adds affordable housing options to the City’s
housing stock. This project is a step in the right direction.
There are many added benefits for the City that result from the
production of housing. This includes valuable investments within the
community such as: a communitywide park, including a dog park and a
barbeque/picnic area, and an internal walkway system. Beltramo Ranch
will strengthen the local economy by generating new streams of
revenue for Moorpark. Estimates show that for each unit of housing at
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE
Dave Little, Pardee Homes.
President
Neils Cotter, Carmel Partners
Vice President
Derek Fraychineaud, CIM Group
Vice President
Kevin Harbison, New Urban West
Vice President
Larry Hoffman, Fassberg Contracting Corporation
Vice President
John Hrovat, Equity Residential
Vice President
Greg McWilliams, FivePoint
Vice President
Monica Mejia, LINC Housing
Vice President
Jeremy Parness, Lennar
Vice President
Frank Su, Toll Brothers
Vice President
Henrik Nazarian, D & D Engineering, Inc.
Secretary, Treasurer
Derek Leavitt, Modative, Inc.
Immediate Past-President
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
Tyler Bargiel, Wells Fargo
Rocco Cordola, Gothic Landscape
Lauren Cross, City Ventures
Donna Deutchman, Homes 4 Families
George Dickerson, All Promotions Etc.
Richard Dunbar, Oakridge Landscape, Inc.
Ryan Flautz, KTGY Architecture & Planning, Inc.
Mike Frasco, Bio Clean Environmental Services
Amy Freilich, Armbruster Goldsmith & Delvac LLP
David Grunwald, National CORE
Peter Gutierrez, Latham & Watkins
Andy Henderson, The Henderson Law Firm
Marc Huffman, Brookfield Residential
Krysti Irving, Landscape Development, Inc.
Karl Mallick, David Evans & Associates,
Bill McReynolds, Warmington Group
Greg Medeiros, Tejon Ranch Company
Brian Murtaugh, Loan Depot
John Musella, The Musella Group
Scott Ouellette, Williams Homes
Erik Pfahler, Borstein Enterprises
Harriet Rapista, Comstock Homes
Darrell Simien, Habitat for Humanity of Greater LA
Alyssa Trebil, DuctTesters, Inc.
Brett Trebil, Watt Communities
Christine Villegas, Chelsea Investment Corp
Rick White, Larrabure Framing
50
least three jobs are produced. This project, itself, will create construction jobs during this difficult
economic condition, and the infusion of work and future residents will help support local
businesses.
In addition to improving the economic sustainability of the community, this project will maintain
consistency in character with the surrounding neighborhood by meeting the City’s Housing Element
Goals and Policies. The Warmington Group has worked to address the concerns expressed during
the City’s Development Review Committee and has worked with the community to mitigate any
negative impacts.
We are proud to support these critical efforts in the creation of housing opportunities. For these
reasons, we would like to urge the Community & Economic Development Committee to approve
the Beltramo Ranch housing development. Thank you for your consideration of this request. Should
you have any questions, please contact BIASC-LAV Vice President, Diana Coronado at
dcoronado@bialav.org.
Sincerely,
Diana Victoria Coronado
Vice President
BIASC-Los Angeles/Ventura
Sent via e-mail
51
From:Carri Brown
To:Planning
Subject:Opposition to Beltramo Ranch
Date:Monday, June 22, 2020 12:44:17 PM
Ms. Mikos and Mr. Pollack:
I assume that neither of you would want a high density, three story condominium built three feet off your
back property line. So why do you think it is okay to do it to mine? I also assume that you would not want
your privacy invaded, your backyard the subject of peering eyes, and the sun completely blocked from
your yard. Why do you think the residents of Heather Glen and Maureen Lane would want that? It would
be hard for me to believe that either of you would be fine with increased traffic, increased crime, and
increased noise, along with a decrease in home value and quality of life in your neighborhood.
A super high density development wedged between two of the longest standing neighborhoods in
Moorpark is not only incompatible, but will give off a “San Fernando Valley feel" that does not belong
here in Ventura County. We live here because we do not want that – not because we want to become
that.
Respectfully,
Carri Brown - Resident since 1984
4754 Elderberry Ave
52
From:Chris Aitkens
To:Planning
Subject:Opposition to General Plan Amendment for Beltramo Ranch
Date:Monday, June 22, 2020 11:08:16 AM
June 22, 2020
Moorpark Community & Economic Development Standing Committee
Councilmembers Roseann Mikos and David Pollack
799 Moorpark Avenue
Moorpark, CA 93021
Re. General Plan Amendment Application for Proposed Beltramo Ranch
Community
Honorable Councilmembers Roseann Mikos and David Pollack:
I am writing to express my deep concern about the proposed Warmington
development on Los Angeles Avenue between my HOA, Heather Glen, and the
community around Maureen Lane. Amending the Land Use Designation of the
General Plan to shoe-horn this 102-unit development into just 7.4 acres will
irreversibly impact the quality of life for two long-time communities.
There are several reasons this project should not be permitted to move forward. Here
are a couple of the most concerning:
1. VIOLATION OF ELEMENT GOAL #5 and POLICY #5.2 FROM THE GENERAL
PLAN
Both of the communities adjacent to the proposed development have long enjoyed
the rural character of this edge of Moorpark. People in the Maureen Lane community
own horses and other farm animals that will be traumatized by both the building
process and the subsequent proximity to such a densely populated area. We in
Heather Glen appreciate being next to a rural community that reminds us of
Moorpark’s roots. For some of us, it’s the reason we chose this location to buy our
homes.
Granted, Heather Glen is designated High Density, but our community has little
impact on the Maureen Lane community because we are separated from each other
by a wide swath of land that includes Beltramo Ranch Road. This separation of
residential from rural would be wiped out by the Warmington development.
The clash between existing communities and the High Density Warmington
development makes the “new residential houses [in]compatible with the character of
existing individual neighborhoods.” It is also incompatible “with the scale and
character of the surrounding neighborhood.”
2. INCREASED TRAFFIC ON ALREADY CONGESTED #118
Another very serious concern is related to increased traffic. The backup at the
intersection of Los Angeles Avenue and Tierra Rejada is terrible at certain times of
the day. This will only become much worse once the already-approved 369-unit
53
housing development on the east side of the Maureen Lane community is built. To
add several hundred MORE cars to that juncture will be a nightmare.
3. INVASION OF PRIVACY AND BLOCKED SUNLIGHT FOR RESIDENTS OF
ELDERBERRY AVENUE
As the Warmington plan is currently envisioned, the new condos will be lined up just a
few feet from the back walls of the homes on the east side of Elderberry Avenue. The
Beltramo units will be several feet higher than the Elderberry Avenue homes and
about 30’ tall, affording an easy view into the bedroom and living area windows of
those homes and blocking much needed morning sunlight to plants and gardens in
their backyards.
4. OVER-CROWDING OF MOORPARK HIGH SCHOOL
How can the high school accommodate the large number of additional students that
will come from two large new developments when the school is
currently at capacity with over 2000 students? (Let’s not even talk about COVID-19
social distancing!)
As a citizen of Moorpark who loves this community and especially cherishes the
ambiance and character of the neighborhood I live in here, I urge the Committee and
the Council to not approve the General Plan Amendment requested by the
Warmington Group. If the project appeals to you, please find another parcel where it
won’t impact the quality of life of people who have chosen their homes for that very
quality of life.
Thank you,
Chris Aitkens
4819 Penrose Ave.
Moorpark, CA 93021
805-660-7160
ChrisAitkens1@gmail.com
54
From:SHARON CLUGSTON
To:Planning
Subject:Opposition to General Plan Amendment for Beltramo Ranch
Date:Monday, June 22, 2020 8:50:02 AM
June 22, 2020
Moorpark Community & Economic Development Standing Committee
Councilmembers Roseann Mikos and David Pollack
799 Moorpark Avenue
Moorpark, CA 93021
Re. General Plan Amendment Application for Proposed Beltramo Ranch Community
Honorable Councilmembers Roseann Mikos and David Pollack:
I am writing to express my deep concern about the proposed Warmington development on Los
Angeles Avenue between my HOA, Heather Glen, and the community around Maureen Lane.
Amending the Land Use Designation of the General Plan to shoe-horn this 102-unit development
into just 7.4 acres will irreversibly impact the quality of life for two long-time communities.
There are several reasons this project should not be permitted to move forward. Here are a
couple of the most concerning:
1. VIOLATION OF ELEMENT GOAL #5 and POLICY #5.2 FROM THE GENERAL PLAN
Both of the communities adjacent to the proposed development have long enjoyed the rural
character of this edge of Moorpark. People in the Maureen Lane community own horses and
other farm animals that will be traumatized by both the building process and the subsequent
proximity to such a densely populated area. We in Heather Glen appreciate being next to a rural
community that reminds us of Moorpark’s roots. For some of us, it’s the reason we chose this
location to buy our homes.
Granted, Heather Glen is designated High Density, but our community has little impact on the
Maureen Lane community because we are separated from each other by a wide swath of land
that includes Beltramo Ranch Road. This separation of residential from rural would be wiped out
by the Warmington development.
The clash between existing communities and the High Density Warmington development makes
the “new residential houses [in]compatible with the character of existing individual
neighborhoods.” It is also incompatible “with the scale and character of the surrounding
neighborhood.”
2. INCREASED TRAFFIC ON ALREADY CONGESTED #118
Another very serious concern is related to increased traffic. The backup at the intersection of Los
Angeles Avenue and Tierra Rejada is terrible at certain times of the day. This will only become
much worse once the already-approved 369-unit housing development on the east side of the
55
Maureen Lane community is built. To add several hundred MORE cars to that juncture will be a
nightmare.
3. INVASION OF PRIVACY AND BLOCKED SUNLIGHT FOR RESIDENTS OF ELDERBERRY
AVENUE
As the Warmington plan is currently envisioned, the new condos will be lined up just a few feet
from the back walls of the homes on the east side of Elderberry Avenue. The Beltramo units will
be several feet higher than the Elderberry Avenue homes and about 30’ tall, affording an easy
view into the bedroom and living area windows of those homes and blocking much needed
morning sunlight to plants and gardens in their back yards.
4. OVER-CROWDING OF MOORPARK HIGH SCHOOL
How can the high school accommodate the large number of additional students that will come
from two large new developments when the school is
currently at capacity with over 2000 students? (Let’s not even talk about COVID-19 social
distancing!)
As a citizen of Moorpark who loves this community and especially cherishes the ambiance and
character of the neighborhood I live in here, I urge the Committee and the Council to not approve
the General Plan Amendment requested by the Warmington Group. If the project appeals to you,
please find another parcel where it won’t impact the quality of life of people who have chosen
their homes for that very quality of life.
Thank you,
Gladys Sharon Clugston
4834 Elderberry Ave
Moorpark, Ca 93021
56
From:Lee, Heather
To:Planning
Subject:Opposition to General Plan Amendment for Beltramo Ranch
Date:Monday, June 22, 2020 12:55:52 PM
June 21, 2020
Moorpark Community & Economic Development Standing Committee
Councilmembers Roseann Mikos and David Pollack
799 Moorpark Avenue
Moorpark, CA 93021
Re. General Plan Amendment Application for Proposed Beltramo Ranch Community
Honorable Councilmembers Roseann Mikos and David Pollack:
I am writing to express my deep concern about the proposed Warmington development on Los Angeles
Avenue between my HOA, Heather Glen, and the community around Maureen Lane. Amending the Land
Use Designation of the General Plan to shoe-horn this 102-unit development into just 7.4 acres will
irreversibly impact the quality of life for two long-time communities.
There are several reasons this project should not be permitted to move forward. Here are a couple of the
most concerning:
1. VIOLATION OF ELEMENT GOAL #5 and POLICY #5.2 FROM THE GENERAL PLAN
Both of the communities adjacent to the proposed development have long enjoyed the rural character of this
edge of Moorpark. People in the Maureen Lane community own horses and other farm animals that will be
traumatized by both the building process and the subsequent proximity to such a densely populated area.
We in Heather Glen appreciate being next to a rural community that reminds us of Moorpark’s roots. For
some of us, it’s the reason we chose this location to buy our homes.
Granted, Heather Glen is designated High Density, but our community has little impact on the Maureen
Lane community because we are separated from each other by a wide swath of land that includes Beltramo
Ranch Road. This separation of residential from rural would be wiped out by the Warmington
development.
The clash between existing communities and the High Density Warmington development makes the “new
residential houses [in]compatible with the character of existing individual neighborhoods.” It is also
incompatible “with the scale and character of the surrounding neighborhood.”
2. INCREASED TRAFFIC ON ALREADY CONGESTED #118
Another very serious concern is related to increased traffic. The backup at the intersection of Los Angeles
Avenue and Tierra Rejada is terrible at certain times of the day. This will only become much worse once
the already-approved 369-unit housing development on the east side of the Maureen Lane community is
built. To add several hundred MORE cars to that juncture will be a nightmare.
3. INVASION OF PRIVACY AND BLOCKED SUNLIGHT FOR RESIDENTS OF ELDERBERRY
AVENUE
As the Warmington plan is currently envisioned, the new condos will be lined up just a few feet from the
back walls of the homes on the east side of Elderberry Avenue. The Beltramo units will be several feet
57
higher than the Elderberry Avenue homes and about 30’ tall, affording an easy view into the bedroom and
living area windows of those homes and blocking much needed morning sunlight to plants and gardens in
their back yards.
4. OVER-CROWDING OF MOORPARK HIGH SCHOOL
How can the high school accommodate the large number of additional students that will come from two
large new developments when the school is
currently at capacity with over 2000 students? (Let’s not even talk about COVID-19 social distancing!)
As a citizen of Moorpark who loves this community and especially cherishes the ambiance and character of
the neighborhood I live in here, I urge the Committee and the Council to not approve the General Plan
Amendment requested by the Warmington Group. If the project appeals to you, please find another parcel
where it won’t impact the quality of life of people who have chosen their homes for that very quality of
life.
Thank you,
Heather Lee
4726 Elderberry ave.
Moorpark, Ca. 93021
58
From:Heather Stuve
To:City Council & City Manager; Freddy Carrillo
Subject:No Very High Density Residential Planning Development
Date:Monday, June 22, 2020 12:58:15 PM
To whom it may concern:
As a resident of 4750 Elderberry Avenue in Moorpark, I would like to express my vehement opposition to
The Warmington Group's request to make a change to the General Plan Amendment for the parcel of
land between Tierra Rejada Road and Maureen Lane.
There is no reason to make a change to the General Plan to Very High Density and would allow a
monstrous new development between our small neighborhood and the large lot single family homes on
Maureen Lane.
Sincerely,
Heather Stuve
4750 Elderberry Avenue
Moorpark, CA 93021
59
From:Jerry Lee
To:Planning
Subject:Opposition to General Plan Amendment for Beltramo Ranch
Date:Sunday, June 21, 2020 8:29:49 PM
June 21, 2020
Moorpark Community & Economic Development Standing Committee
Councilmembers Roseann Mikos and David Pollack
799 Moorpark Avenue
Moorpark, CA 93021
Re. General Plan Amendment Application for Proposed Beltramo Ranch Community
Honorable Councilmembers Roseann Mikos and David Pollack:
I am writing to express my deep concern about the proposed Warmington development on Los
Angeles Avenue between my HOA, Heather Glen, and the community around Maureen Lane.
Amending the Land Use Designation of the General Plan to shoe-horn this 102-unit development
into just 7.4 acres will irreversibly impact the quality of life for two long-time communities.
There are several reasons this project should not be permitted to move forward. Here are a
couple of the most concerning:
1. VIOLATION OF ELEMENT GOAL #5 and POLICY #5.2 FROM THE GENERAL PLAN
Both of the communities adjacent to the proposed development have long enjoyed the rural
character of this edge of Moorpark. People in the Maureen Lane community own horses and
other farm animals that will be traumatized by both the building process and the subsequent
proximity to such a densely populated area. We in Heather Glen appreciate being next to a rural
community that reminds us of Moorpark’s roots. For some of us, it’s the reason we chose this
location to buy our homes.
Granted, Heather Glen is designated High Density, but our community has little impact on the
Maureen Lane community because we are separated from each other by a wide swath of land
that includes Beltramo Ranch Road. This separation of residential from rural would be wiped out
by the Warmington development.
The clash between existing communities and the High Density Warmington development makes
the “new residential houses [in]compatible with the character of existing individual
neighborhoods.” It is also incompatible “with the scale and character of the surrounding
neighborhood.”
2. INCREASED TRAFFIC ON ALREADY CONGESTED #118
Another very serious concern is related to increased traffic. The backup at the intersection of Los
Angeles Avenue and Tierra Rejada is terrible at certain times of the day. This will only become
much worse once the already-approved 369-unit housing development on the east side of the
60
Maureen Lane community is built. To add several hundred MORE cars to that juncture will be a
nightmare.
3. INVASION OF PRIVACY AND BLOCKED SUNLIGHT FOR RESIDENTS OF ELDERBERRY
AVENUE
As the Warmington plan is currently envisioned, the new condos will be lined up just a few feet
from the back walls of the homes on the east side of Elderberry Avenue. The Beltramo units will
be several feet higher than the Elderberry Avenue homes and about 30’ tall, affording an easy
view into the bedroom and living area windows of those homes and blocking much needed
morning sunlight to plants and gardens in their back yards.
4. OVER-CROWDING OF MOORPARK HIGH SCHOOL
How can the high school accommodate the large number of additional students that will come
from two large new developments when the school is
currently at capacity with over 2000 students? (Let’s not even talk about COVID-19 social
distancing!)
As a citizen of Moorpark who loves this community and especially cherishes the ambiance and
character of the neighborhood I live in here, I urge the Committee and the Council to not approve
the General Plan Amendment requested by the Warmington Group. If the project appeals to you,
please find another parcel where it won’t impact the quality of life of people who have chosen
their homes for that very quality of life.
Thank you,
- Jerry Lee
4726 Elderberry Ave
Moorpark, CA
61
June 21, 2020
Moorpark Community & Economic Development Standing Committee
Councilmembers Roseann Mikos and David Pollack
799 Moorpark Avenue
Moorpark, CA 93021
Re. General Plan Amendment Application for Proposed Beltramo Ranch Community
Honorable Council members Roseann Mikos and David Pollack:
I am writing to express my deep concern about the proposed Warmington development on Los Angeles Avenue between my
HOA, Heather Glen, and the community around Maureen Lane. Amending the Land Use Designation of the General Plan to
shoe-horn this 102-unit development into just 7.4 acres will irreversibly impact the quality of life for two long-time
communities.
There are several reasons this project should not be permitted to move forward. Here are a couple of the most concerning:
1. VIOLATION OF ELEMENT GOAL #5 and POLICY #5.2 FROM THE GENERAL PLAN
Both of the communities adjacent to the proposed development have long enjoyed the rural character of this edge of
Moorpark. People in the Maureen Lane community own horses and other farm animals that will be traumatized by both the
building process and the subsequent proximity to such a densely populated area. We in Heather Glen appreciate being next
to a rural community that reminds us of Moorpark’s roots. For some of us, it’s the reason we chose this location to buy our
homes.
Granted, Heather Glen is designated High Density, but our community has little impact on the Maureen Lane community
because we are separated from each other by a wide swath of land that includes Beltramo Ranch Road. This separation of
residential from rural would be wiped out by the Warmington development.
The clash between existing communities and the High Density Warmington development makes the “new residential houses
[in]compatible with the character of existing individual neighborhoods.” It is also incompatible “with the scale and character
of the surrounding neighborhood.”
2. INCREASED TRAFFIC ON ALREADY CONGESTED #118
Another very serious concern is related to increased traffic. The backup at the intersection of Los Angeles Avenue and
Tierra Rejada is terrible at certain times of the day. This will only become much worse once the already-approved 369-unit
housing development on the east side of the Maureen Lane community is built. To add several hundred MORE cars to that
juncture will be a nightmare.
3. INVASION OF PRIVACY AND BLOCKED SUNLIGHT FOR RESIDENTS OF ELDERBERRY AVENUE
As the Warmington plan is currently envisioned, the new condos will be lined up just a few feet from the back walls of the
homes on the east side of Elderberry Avenue. The Beltramo units will be several feet higher than the Elderberry Avenue
homes and about 30’ tall, affording an easy view into the bedroom and living area windows of those homes and blocking
much needed morning sunlight to plants and gardens in their back yards.
4. OVER-CROWDING OF MOORPARK HIGH SCHOOL
How can the high school accommodate the large number of additional students that will come from two large new
developments when the school is
currently at capacity with over 2000 students? (Let’s not even talk about COVID-19 social distancing!)
As a citizen of Moorpark who loves this community and especially cherishes the ambiance and character of the
neighborhood I live in here, I urge the Committee and the Council to not approve the General Plan Amendment requested
by the Warmington Group. If the project appeals to you, please find another parcel where it won’t impact the quality of life of
people who have chosen their homes for that very quality of life.
Thank you,
Judy Dee
4730 Justin Court
Moorpark, CA 93021
805-479-2418
62
From:bobapino@gmail.com
To:Planning
Subject:Opposition to General plan Amendment for Beltramo Ranch
Date:Sunday, June 21, 2020 8:15:09 PM
June 21, 2020
Moorpark Community & Economic Development Standing Committee
Councilmembers Roseann Mikos and David Pollack
799 Moorpark Avenue
Moorpark, CA 93021
Re. General Plan Amendment Application for Proposed Beltramo Ranch Community
Honorable Councilmembers Roseann Mikos and David Pollack:
I am writing to express my deep concern about the proposed Warmington development on Los
Angeles Avenue between my HOA, Heather Glen, and the community around Maureen Lane.
Amending the Land Use Designation of the General Plan to shoe-horn this 102-unit development
into just 7.4 acres will irreversibly impact the quality of life for two long-time communities.
There are several reasons this project should not be permitted to move forward. Here are a
couple of the most concerning:
1. VIOLATION OF ELEMENT GOAL #5 and POLICY #5.2 FROM THE GENERAL PLAN
Both of the communities adjacent to the proposed development have long enjoyed the rural
character of this edge of Moorpark. People in the Maureen Lane community own horses and
other farm animals that will be traumatized by both the building process and the subsequent
proximity to such a densely populated area. We in Heather Glen appreciate being next to a rural
community that reminds us of Moorpark’s roots. For some of us, it’s the reason we chose this
location to buy our homes.
Granted, Heather Glen is designated High Density, but our community has little impact on the
Maureen Lane community because we are separated from each other by a wide swath of land
that includes Beltramo Ranch Road. This separation of residential from rural would be wiped out
by the Warmington development.
The clash between existing communities and the High Density Warmington development makes
the “new residential houses [in]compatible with the character of existing individual
neighborhoods.” It is also incompatible “with the scale and character of the surrounding
neighborhood.”
2. INCREASED TRAFFIC ON ALREADY CONGESTED #118
Another very serious concern is related to increased traffic. The backup at the intersection of Los
Angeles Avenue and Tierra Rejada is terrible at certain times of the day. This will only become
much worse once the already-approved 369-unit housing development on the east side of the
63
Maureen Lane community is built. To add several hundred MORE cars to that juncture will be a
nightmare.
3. INVASION OF PRIVACY AND BLOCKED SUNLIGHT FOR RESIDENTS OF ELDERBERRY
AVENUE
As the Warmington plan is currently envisioned, the new condos will be lined up just a few feet
from the back walls of the homes on the east side of Elderberry Avenue. The Beltramo units will
be several feet higher than the Elderberry Avenue homes and about 30’ tall, affording an easy
view into the bedroom and living area windows of those homes and blocking much needed
morning sunlight to plants and gardens in their back yards.
4. OVER-CROWDING OF MOORPARK HIGH SCHOOL
How can the high school accommodate the large number of additional students that will come
from two large new developments when the school is
currently at capacity with over 2000 students? (Let’s not even talk about COVID-19 social
distancing!)
As a citizen of Moorpark who loves this community and especially cherishes the ambiance and
character of the neighborhood I live in here, I urge the Committee and the Council to not approve
the General Plan Amendment requested by the Warmington Group. If the project appeals to you,
please find another parcel where it won’t impact the quality of life of people who have chosen
their homes for that very quality of life.
Thank you,
Kelsey and Bonnie Vela
4743 Elderberry Ave.
Moorpark, Ca. 93021
Sent from my iPhone
64
From:Laura Hansen
To:Planning; Linda Hofer
Subject:Re. General Plan Amendment Application for Proposed Beltramo Ranch Community
Date:Monday, June 22, 2020 12:36:10 PM
Honorable Councilmembers Roseann Mikos and David Pollack:
I am writing to express my deep concern and apprehension about the proposed Warmington
development on Los Angeles Avenue between our HOA, Heather Glen, and the community
around Maureen Lane. Amending the Land Use Designation of the General Plan to allow this
102-unit development in this small space will irreversibly impact the quality of life for our
community.
There are several reasons this project should not be permitted to move forward. Here are a
couple of the most concerning:
1. VIOLATION OF ELEMENT GOAL #5 and POLICY #5.2 FROM THE GENERAL PLAN
Both of the communities adjacent to the proposed development have long enjoyed the rural
character of this edge of Moorpark. People in the Maureen Lane community own horses and
other farm animals that will be traumatized by both the building process and the subsequent
proximity to such a densely populated area. We in Heather Glen appreciate being next to a rural
community that reminds us of Moorpark’s roots. For some of us, it’s the reason we chose this
location to buy our homes.
The clash between existing communities and the High Density Warmington development makes
the “new residential houses incompatible with the character of existing individual neighborhoods.
It is also incompatible with the surrounding neighborhoods.
2. INCREASED TRAFFIC ON ALREADY CONGESTED #118
Another very serious concern is related to increased traffic. The backup at the intersection of Los
Angeles Avenue and Tierra Rejada is terrible at certain times of the day. This will become much
worse once the new housing development on the east side of the Maureen Lane community is
built. To add several hundred MORE cars to that intersection will be a nightmare.
3. INVASION OF PRIVACY AND BLOCKED SUNLIGHT FOR RESIDENTS OF ELDERBERRY
AVENUE
These new condos will be too close to the back walls of the homes on the east side of Elderberry
Avenue. The height of the Beltramo units is incompatible with the ajdacent Elderberry Avenue
homes, affording an easy view into the bedroom and living area windows of those homes.
The height of the buildings will block sunlight to the homes and backyards, making those homes
dark and dreary.
4. OVERCROWDING OF MOORPARK SCHOOLS
65
The high density of the project will impact our school community, especially considering the
development on the other side of Maureen Lane.
I have lived in the Heather Glen community for almost twenty years. This development will
seriously degrade our quality of life.
I urge the Committee and the Council to disallow the General Plan Amendment requested by the
Warmington Group. The project should be relocated to another parcel where it won’t impact the
quality of life of people who already live here, or the height of the development should be
restricted and the location of the buildings on each lot modified to allow more room between the
new development and existing homes.
Thank you,
Laura Hansen
4713 Elderberry Ave.
Mooropark
(Also own 4708 Elderberry Ave., directly adjacent to the new development.)
--
Laura Hansen
805.231.4206
66
From:Freddy Carrillo
To:Freddy Carrillo
Subject:FW: Opposition to General Plan Amendment for Beltramo Ranch
Date:Monday, June 22, 2020 4:05:29 PM
From: Jo [mailto:jomom63@aol.com]
Sent: Monday, June 22, 2020 1:59 PM
To: Planning
Subject: Opposition to General Plan Amendment for Beltramo Ranch
June 22, 2020
Moorpark Community & Economic Development Standing Committee
Councilmembers Roseann Mikos and David Pollack
799 Moorpark Avenue
Moorpark, CA 93021
Re. General Plan Amendment Application for Proposed Beltramo Ranch Community
Honorable Councilmembers Roseann Mikos and David Pollack:
I am writing to express my deep concern about the proposed Warmington development on Los
Angeles Avenue between my HOA, Heather Glen, and the community around Maureen Lane.
Amending the Land Use Designation of the General Plan to shoe-horn this 102-unit development
into just 7.4 acres will irreversibly impact the quality of life for two long-time communities.
There are several reasons this project should not be permitted to move forward. Here are a
couple of the most concerning:
1. VIOLATION OF ELEMENT GOAL #5 and POLICY #5.2 FROM THE GENERAL PLAN
Both of the communities adjacent to the proposed development have long enjoyed the rural
character of this edge of Moorpark. People in the Maureen Lane community own horses and
other farm animals that will be traumatized by both the building process and the subsequent
proximity to such a densely populated area. We in Heather Glen appreciate being next to a rural
community that reminds us of Moorpark’s roots. For some of us, it’s the reason we chose this
location to buy our homes.
Granted, Heather Glen is designated High Density, but our community has little impact on the
Maureen Lane community because we are separated from each other by a wide swath of land
that includes Beltramo Ranch Road. This separation of residential from rural would be wiped out
by the Warmington development.
The clash between existing communities and the High Density Warmington development makes
the “new residential houses [in]compatible with the character of existing individual
neighborhoods.” It is also incompatible “with the scale and character of the surrounding
neighborhood.”
2. INCREASED TRAFFIC ON ALREADY CONGESTED #118
Another very serious concern is related to increased traffic. The backup at the intersection of Los
Angeles Avenue and Tierra Rejada is terrible at certain times of the day. This will only become
much worse once the already-approved 369-unit housing development on the east side of the
Maureen Lane community is built. To add several hundred MORE cars to that juncture will be a
nightmare.
3. INVASION OF PRIVACY AND BLOCKED SUNLIGHT FOR RESIDENTS OF ELDERBERRY
AVENUE
67
As the Warmington plan is currently envisioned, the new condos will be lined up just a few feet
from the back walls of the homes on the east side of Elderberry Avenue. The Beltramo units will
be several feet higher than the Elderberry Avenue homes and about 30’ tall, affording an easy
view into the bedroom and living area windows of those homes and blocking much needed
morning sunlight to plants and gardens in their back yards.
4. OVER-CROWDING OF MOORPARK HIGH SCHOOL
How can the high school accommodate the large number of additional students that will come
from two large new developments when the school is
currently at capacity with over 2000 students? (Let’s not even talk about COVID-19 social
distancing!)
As a citizen of Moorpark who loves this community and especially cherishes the ambiance and
character of the neighborhood I live in here, I urge the Committee and the Council to not approve
the General Plan Amendment requested by the Warmington Group. If the project appeals to you,
please find another parcel where it won’t impact the quality of life of people who have chosen
their homes for that very quality of life.
Thank you,
Melanie Jo Baldwin
4745 Penrose Ave
Moorpark, CA 93021
68
From:Michael
To:Planning
Subject:Opposition to General Plan Amendment for Beltramo Ranch
Date:Sunday, June 21, 2020 9:45:42 PM
June 21, 2020
Moorpark Community & Economic Development Standing Committee
Councilmembers Roseann Mikos and David Pollack
799 Moorpark Avenue
Moorpark, CA 93021
Re. General Plan Amendment Application for Proposed Beltramo Ranch Community
Honorable Councilmembers Roseann Mikos and David Pollack:
I am writing to express my deep concern about the proposed Warmington development on Los
Angeles Avenue between my HOA, Heather Glen, and the community around Maureen Lane.
Amending the Land Use Designation of the General Plan to shoe-horn this 102-unit
development into just 7.4 acres will irreversibly impact the quality of life for two long-time
communities.
There are several reasons this project should not be permitted to move forward. Here are a
couple of the most concerning:
1. VIOLATION OF ELEMENT GOAL #5 and POLICY #5.2 FROM THE GENERAL
PLAN
Both of the communities adjacent to the proposed development have long enjoyed the rural
character of this edge of Moorpark. People in the Maureen Lane community own horses and
other farm animals that will be traumatized by both the building process and the subsequent
proximity to such a densely populated area. We in Heather Glen appreciate being next to a
rural community that reminds us of Moorpark’s roots. For some of us, it’s the reason we
chose this location to buy our homes.
Granted, Heather Glen is designated High Density, but our community has little impact on the
Maureen Lane community because we are separated from each other by a wide swath of land
that includes Beltramo Ranch Road. This separation of residential from rural would be wiped
out by the Warmington development.
The clash between existing communities and the High Density Warmington development
makes the “new residential houses [in]compatible with the character of existing individual
neighborhoods.” It is also incompatible “with the scale and character of the surrounding
69
neighborhood.”
2. INCREASED TRAFFIC ON ALREADY CONGESTED #118
Another very serious concern is related to increased traffic. The backup at the intersection of
Los Angeles Avenue and Tierra Rejada is terrible at certain times of the day. This will only
become much worse once the already-approved 369-unit housing development on the east
side of the Maureen Lane community is built. To add several hundred MORE cars to that
juncture will be a nightmare.
3. INVASION OF PRIVACY AND BLOCKED SUNLIGHT FOR RESIDENTS OF
ELDERBERRY AVENUE
As the Warmington plan is currently envisioned, the new condos will be lined up just a few
feet from the back walls of the homes on the east side of Elderberry Avenue. The Beltramo
units will be several feet higher than the Elderberry Avenue homes and about 30’ tall,
affording an easy view into the bedroom and living area windows of those homes and
blocking much needed morning sunlight to plants and gardens in their back yards.
4. OVER-CROWDING OF MOORPARK HIGH SCHOOL
How can the high school accommodate the large number of additional students that will come
from two large new developments when the school is
currently at capacity with over 2000 students? (Let’s not even talk about COVID-19 social
distancing!)
As a citizen of Moorpark who loves this community and especially cherishes the ambiance
and character of the neighborhood I live in here, I urge the Committee and the Council to not
approve the General Plan Amendment requested by the Warmington Group. If the project
appeals to you, please find another parcel where it won’t impact the quality of life of people
who have chosen their homes for that very quality of life.
Thank you,
Michael and Olivia Whitelaw
4792 Elderberry Ave.
Moorpark, CA 93021
70
From:Christy Strunk
To:Planning
Subject:Re. General Plan Amendment Application for Proposed Beltramo Ranch Community
Date:Monday, June 22, 2020 11:52:32 AM
Moorpark Community & Economic
Development Standing Committee
Councilmembers Roseann Mikos and David
Pollack
799 Moorpark Avenue
Moorpark, CA 93021
Re. General Plan Amendment Application
for Proposed Beltramo Ranch
Community
Honorable Councilmembers Roseann Mikos
and David Pollack:
I am writing to express my deep concern
about the proposed Warmington
development on Los Angeles Avenue
between my HOA, Heather Glen, and the
community around Maureen Lane.
Amending the Land Use Designation of the
General Plan to shoe-horn this 102-unit
development into just 7.4 acres will
irreversibly impact the quality of life for two
long-time communities.
There are several reasons this project
should not be permitted to move forward.
Here are a couple of the most concerning:
1. VIOLATION OF ELEMENT GOAL #5 and
POLICY #5.2 FROM THE GENERAL PLAN
Both of the communities adjacent to the
proposed development have long enjoyed
the rural character of this edge of Moorpark.
People in the Maureen Lane community
71
own horses and other farm animals that will
be traumatized by both the building process
and the subsequent proximity to such a
densely populated area. We in Heather
Glen appreciate being next to a rural
community that reminds us of Moorpark’s
roots. For some of us, it’s the reason we
chose this location to buy our homes.
Granted, Heather Glen is designated High
Density, but our community has little impact
on the Maureen Lane community because
we are separated from each other by a wide
swath of land that includes Beltramo Ranch
Road. This separation of residential from
rural would be wiped out by the Warmington
development.
The clash between existing communities and
the High Density Warmington development
makes the “new residential houses
[in]compatible with the character of existing
individual neighborhoods.” It is also
incompatible “with the scale and character
of the surrounding neighborhood.”
2. INCREASED TRAFFIC ON ALREADY
CONGESTED #118
Another very serious concern is related to
increased traffic. The backup at the
intersection of Los Angeles Avenue and
Tierra Rejada is terrible at certain times of
the day. This will only become much worse
once the already-approved 369-unit housing
development on the east side of the
Maureen Lane community is built. To add
several hundred MORE cars to that juncture
will be a nightmare.
3. INVASION OF PRIVACY AND
BLOCKED SUNLIGHT FOR RESIDENTS
OF ELDERBERRY AVENUE
As the Warmington plan is currently
72
envisioned, the new condos will be lined up
just a few feet from the back walls of the
homes on the east side of Elderberry
Avenue. The Beltramo units will be several
feet higher than the Elderberry Avenue
homes and about 30’ tall, affording an easy
view into the bedroom and living area
windows of those homes and blocking much
needed morning sunlight to plants and
gardens in their back yards.
4. OVER-CROWDING OF MOORPARK
HIGH SCHOOL
How can the high school accommodate the
large number of additional students that will
come from two large new developments
when the school is
currently at capacity with over 2000
students? (Let’s not even talk about COVID-
19 social distancing!)
As a citizen of Moorpark who loves this
community and especially cherishes the
ambiance and character of the
neighborhood I live in here, I urge the
Committee and the Council to not approve
the General Plan Amendment requested by
the Warmington Group. If the project
appeals to you, please find another parcel
where it won’t impact the quality of life of
people who have chosen their homes for
that very quality of life.
Thank you.
Sincerely,
Morgan and Christy Strunk
4830 Penrose Ave
Moorpark CA 93021
73
74
75
From:Sarie Vassallo
To:Planning
Subject:Opposition to General Plan Amendment for Beltramo Ranch
Date:Sunday, June 21, 2020 9:07:31 PM
Re. General Plan Amendment Application for Proposed Beltramo Ranch Community
Honorable Councilmembers Roseann Mikos and David Pollack:
I am writing to express my deep concern about the proposed Warmington development on Los Angeles
Avenue between my HOA, Heather Glen, and the community around Maureen Lane. Amending the Land
Use Designation of the General Plan to shoe-horn this 102-unit development into just 7.4 acres will
irreversibly impact the quality of life for two long-time communities.
There are several reasons this project should not be permitted to move forward. Here are a couple of the
most concerning:
1. VIOLATION OF ELEMENT GOAL #5 and POLICY #5.2 FROM THE GENERAL PLAN
Both of the communities adjacent to the proposed development have long enjoyed the rural character of this
edge of Moorpark. People in the Maureen Lane community own horses and other farm animals that will be
traumatized by both the building process and the subsequent proximity to such a densely populated area.
We in Heather Glen appreciate being next to a rural community that reminds us of Moorpark’s roots. For
some of us, it’s the reason we chose this location to buy our homes.
Granted, Heather Glen is designated High Density, but our community has little impact on the Maureen
Lane community because we are separated from each other by a wide swath of land that includes Beltramo
Ranch Road. This separation of residential from rural would be wiped out by the Warmington
development.
The clash between existing communities and the High Density Warmington development makes the “new
residential houses [in]compatible with the character of existing individual neighborhoods.” It is also
incompatible “with the scale and character of the surrounding neighborhood.”
2. INCREASED TRAFFIC ON ALREADY CONGESTED #118
Another very serious concern is related to increased traffic. The backup at the intersection of Los Angeles
Avenue and Tierra Rejada is terrible at certain times of the day. This will only become much worse once
the already-approved 369-unit housing development on the east side of the Maureen Lane community is
built. To add several hundred MORE cars to that juncture will be a nightmare.
3. INVASION OF PRIVACY AND BLOCKED SUNLIGHT FOR RESIDENTS OF ELDERBERRY
76
AVENUE
As the Warmington plan is currently envisioned, the new condos will be lined up just a few feet from the
back walls of the homes on the east side of Elderberry Avenue. The Beltramo units will be several feet
higher than the Elderberry Avenue homes and about 30’ tall, affording an easy view into the bedroom and
living area windows of those homes and blocking much needed morning sunlight to plants and gardens in
their back yards.
4. OVER-CROWDING OF MOORPARK HIGH SCHOOL
How can the high school accommodate the large number of additional students that will come from two
large new developments when the school is
currently at capacity with over 2000 students? (Let’s not even talk about COVID-19 social distancing!)
As a citizen of Moorpark who loves this community and especially cherishes the ambiance and character of
the neighborhood I live in here, I urge the Committee and the Council to not approve the General Plan
Amendment requested by the Warmington Group. If the project appeals to you, please find another parcel
where it won’t impact the quality of life of people who have chosen their homes for that very quality of
life.
Thank you,
Rosaria Vassallo
Rosaria Vassallo
11850 Courtney Lane
Moorpark, CA 93021
805-469-5285
vassallobills@gmail.com
77
From:Sandra Schneider
To:Planning
Subject:General Plan Amendment for Beltramo Ranch Development
Date:Sunday, June 21, 2020 8:27:19 PM
June 21, 2020
Moorpark Community & Economic Development Standing Committee
Councilmembers Roseann Mikos and David Pollack
799 Moorpark Avenue
Moorpark, CA 93021
Re. General Plan Amendment Application for Proposed Beltramo Ranch
Community
Honorable Councilmembers Roseann Mikos and David Pollack:
I am writing to express my deep concern about the proposed Warmington development
on Los Angeles Avenue between my HOA, Heather Glen, and the community around
Maureen Lane. Amending the Land Use Designation of the General Plan to shoe-horn
this 102-unit development into just 7.4 acres will irreversibly impact the quality of life for
two long-time communities.
There are several reasons this project should not be permitted to move forward. Here are
a couple of the most concerning:
1. VIOLATION OF ELEMENT GOAL #5 and POLICY #5.2 FROM THE GENERAL
PLAN
Both of the communities adjacent to the proposed development have long enjoyed the
rural character of this edge of Moorpark. People in the Maureen Lane community own
horses and other farm animals that will be traumatized by both the building process and
the subsequent proximity to such a densely populated area. We in Heather Glen
appreciate being next to a rural community that reminds us of Moorpark’s roots. For
some of us, it’s the reason we chose this location to buy our homes.
Granted, Heather Glen is designated High Density, but our community has little impact on
the Maureen Lane community because we are separated from each other by a wide
swath of land that includes Beltramo Ranch Road. This separation of residential from
rural would be wiped out by the Warmington development.
The clash between existing communities and the High Density Warmington development
makes the “new residential houses [in]compatible with the character of existing individual
neighborhoods.” It is also incompatible “with the scale and character of the surrounding
78
neighborhood.”
2. INCREASED TRAFFIC ON ALREADY CONGESTED #118
Another very serious concern is related to increased traffic. The backup at the
intersection of Los Angeles Avenue and Tierra Rejada is terrible at certain times of the
day. This will only become much worse once the already-approved 369-unit housing
development on the east side of the Maureen Lane community is built. To add several
hundred MORE cars to that juncture will be a nightmare.
3. INVASION OF PRIVACY AND BLOCKED SUNLIGHT FOR RESIDENTS OF
ELDERBERRY AVENUE
As the Warmington plan is currently envisioned, the new condos will be lined up just a
few feet from the back walls of the homes on the east side of Elderberry Avenue. The
Beltramo units will be several feet higher than the Elderberry Avenue homes and about
30’ tall, affording an easy view into the bedroom and living area windows of those homes
and blocking much needed morning sunlight to plants and gardens in their back yards.
4. OVER-CROWDING OF MOORPARK HIGH SCHOOL
How can the high school accommodate the large number of additional students that will
come from two large new developments when the school is
currently at capacity with over 2000 students? (Let’s not even talk about COVID-19 social
distancing!)
As a citizen of Moorpark who loves this community and especially cherishes the
ambiance and character of the neighborhood I live in here, I urge the Committee and the
Council to not approve the General Plan Amendment requested by the Warmington
Group. If the project appeals to you, please find another parcel where it won’t impact the
quality of life of people who have chosen their homes for that very quality of life.
Thank you,
Sandra Schneider
4731 Elderberry Avenue
Delivered by HOA Express | Contact preferences | Privacy
Sent from my iPad
79
From:Liz Carr
To:Planning
Subject:Opposition to General Plan Amendment for Beltramo Ranch
Date:Monday, June 22, 2020 10:17:56 PM
June 22, 2020
Moorpark Community & Economic Development Standing Committee
Councilmembers Roseann Mikos and David Pollack
799 Moorpark Avenue
Moorpark, CA 93021
Re. General Plan Amendment Application for Proposed Beltramo Ranch Community
Honorable Councilmembers Roseann Mikos and David Pollack:
I am writing to express my deep concern about the proposed Warmington development on Los
Angeles Avenue between my HOA, Heather Glen, and the community around Maureen Lane.
Amending the Land Use Designation of the General Plan to shoe-horn this 102-unit development
into just 7.4 acres will irreversibly impact the quality of life for two long-time communities.
There are several reasons this project should not be permitted to move forward. Here are a
couple of the most concerning:
1. VIOLATION OF ELEMENT GOAL #5 and POLICY #5.2 FROM THE GENERAL PLAN
Both of the communities adjacent to the proposed development have long enjoyed the rural
character of this edge of Moorpark. People in the Maureen Lane community own horses and
other farm animals that will be traumatized by both the building process and the subsequent
proximity to such a densely populated area. We in Heather Glen appreciate being next to a rural
community that reminds us of Moorpark’s roots. For some of us, it’s the reason we chose this
location to buy our homes.
Granted, Heather Glen is designated High Density, but our community has little impact on the
Maureen Lane community because we are separated from each other by a wide swath of land
that includes Beltramo Ranch Road. This separation of residential from rural would be wiped out
by the Warmington development.
The clash between existing communities and the High Density Warmington development makes
the “new residential houses [in]compatible with the character of existing individual
neighborhoods.” It is also incompatible “with the scale and character of the surrounding
neighborhood.”
2. INCREASED TRAFFIC ON ALREADY CONGESTED #118
Another very serious concern is related to increased traffic. The backup at the intersection of Los
Angeles Avenue and Tierra Rejada is terrible at certain times of the day. This will only become
much worse once the already-approved 369-unit housing development on the east side of the
80
Maureen Lane community is built. To add several hundred MORE cars to that juncture will be a
nightmare.
On this point, I would like to add the safety concern regarding the increased traffic in this area.
Moorpark already has one of the worst wildfire evacuation routes. The increased traffic will
greatly impact our safety during an emergency. In the 2018 Hill fire, the traffic for me to get from
Moorpark College to my residence off of LA Avenue and Tierra Rejada took 2 hours.
Another concern regarding the increased traffic is the amount of potholes that will increase. Our
home is backed up to LA Avenue and the amount of potholes that resurface shortly after they
have been filled in is very high. When cars or trucks hit the pot holes, our home shakes so we are
very aware of when they need to be filled in and know when new potholes form.
We have a child who attends Mountain Meadows elementary school. Turning left onto Tierra
Rejada from both Courtney Avenue and Harvester Street can take upwards of 10 minutes on
some days because of the amount of traffic turning onto Tierra Rejada to LA Avenue. Some days
we are 5 or 6 cars deep just to exit our community to go to school. Not only will the increased
traffic with hundreds of new residents add to this congestion, it is unsafe to turn left out of our
neighborhood during high traffic times.
My last concern regarding the increased traffic is the overflow parking of visitors in the new
proposed housing development. With only a few designated parking spots per household, I can
assure you that their guests will be parking in our community. We love to ride our bikes and walk
around our neighborhood and are afraid the increased traffic will pose a safety risk to our small
children.
3. INVASION OF PRIVACY AND BLOCKED SUNLIGHT FOR RESIDENTS OF ELDERBERRY
AVENUE
As the Warmington plan is currently envisioned, the new condos will be lined up just a few feet
from the back walls of the homes on the east side of Elderberry Avenue. The Beltramo units will
be several feet higher than the Elderberry Avenue homes and about 30’ tall, affording an easy
view into the bedroom and living area windows of those homes and blocking much needed
morning sunlight to plants and gardens in their backyards.
4. OVER-CROWDING OF MOORPARK HIGH SCHOOL
How can the high school accommodate the large number of additional students that will come
from two large new developments when the school is
currently at capacity with over 2000 students? (Let’s not even talk about COVID-19 social
distancing!)
As a citizen of Moorpark who loves this community and especially cherishes the ambiance and
character of the neighborhood I live in here, I urge the Committee and the Council to not approve
the General Plan Amendment requested by the Warmington Group. We chose to purchase our
home in the Heather Glen neighborhood because it really does have a small-town, close knit
81
community feel. We have 2 young girls, a 6 and 3 year old and felt like this neighborhood in
Moorpark would give us the opportunity to raise them in a quiet, friendly neighborhood without all
of the hustle and bustle. The new development would take this away from the community. We
greatly enjoy walking, riding our bikes, looking for lizards and friendly snakes in the dirt area
where the proposed buildings will be. We enjoy walking the path at Arroyo Vista Park and know
that with the amount of families moving into the new proposed development, this walking path will
be significantly busier than it already is. The wash will be overrun with people as well.
If the project appeals to you, please find another parcel where it won’t impact the quality of life of
people who have chosen their homes for that very quality of life.
Thank you for your time reading this,
Elizabeth Carr
11837 Nightingale St.
Moorpark, CA 93021
82
From:Jeff Mayeda
To:Planning
Subject:Opposition to General Plan Amendment for Beltramo Ranch
Date:Tuesday, June 23, 2020 9:19:58 AM
June 23, 2020
Moorpark Community & Economic Development Standing Committee
Councilmembers Roseann Mikos and David Pollack
799 Moorpark Avenue
Moorpark, CA 93021
Re. General Plan Amendment Application for Proposed Beltramo Ranch Community
Honorable Councilmembers Roseann Mikos and David Pollack:
We are writing to express our deep concern about the proposed Warmington development on Los
Angeles Avenue between our HOA, Heather Glen, and the community around Maureen Lane.
Amending the Land Use Designation of the General Plan to shoe-horn this 102-unit development
into just 7.4 acres will irreversibly impact the quality of life for two long-time communities.
There are several reasons this project should not be permitted to move forward. Here are a
couple of the most concerning:
1. VIOLATION OF ELEMENT GOAL #5 and POLICY #5.2 FROM THE GENERAL PLAN
Both of the communities adjacent to the proposed development have long enjoyed the rural
character of this edge of Moorpark. People in the Maureen Lane community own horses and
other farm animals that will be traumatized by both the building process and the subsequent
proximity to such a densely populated area. We in Heather Glen appreciate being next to a rural
community that reminds us of Moorpark’s roots. For some of us, it’s the reason we chose this
location to buy our homes.
Granted, Heather Glen is designated High Density, but our community has little impact on the
Maureen Lane community because we are separated from each other by a wide swath of land
that includes Beltramo Ranch Road. This separation of residential from rural would be wiped out
by the Warmington development.
The clash between existing communities and the High Density Warmington development makes
the “new residential houses [in]compatible with the character of existing individual
neighborhoods.” It is also incompatible “with the scale and character of the surrounding
neighborhood.”
2. INCREASED TRAFFIC ON ALREADY CONGESTED #118
Another very serious concern is related to increased traffic. The backup at the intersection of Los
Angeles Avenue and Tierra Rejada is terrible at certain times of the day. This will only become
much worse once the already-approved 369-unit housing development on the east side of the
Maureen Lane community is built. To add several hundred MORE cars to that juncture will be a
nightmare.
3. INVASION OF PRIVACY AND BLOCKED SUNLIGHT FOR RESIDENTS OF ELDERBERRY
AVENUE
83
As the Warmington plan is currently envisioned, the new condos will be lined up just a few feet
from the back walls of the homes on the east side of Elderberry Avenue. The Beltramo units will
be several feet higher than the Elderberry Avenue homes and about 30’ tall, affording an easy
view into the bedroom and living area windows of those homes and blocking much needed
morning sunlight to plants and gardens in their back yards.
4. OVER-CROWDING OF MOORPARK HIGH SCHOOL
How can the high school accommodate the large number of additional students that will come
from two large new developments when the school is
currently at capacity with over 2000 students? (Let’s not even talk about COVID-19 social
distancing!)
As long-time citizens of Moorpark who love this community and especially cherish the ambiance
and character of the neighborhood we live in here, we urge the Committee and the Council to not
approve the General Plan Amendment requested by the Warmington Group. If the project
appeals to you, please find another parcel where it won’t impact the quality of life of people who
have chosen their homes for that very quality of life.
Thank you,
Jeff & Sui-Yuk Mayeda
4776 Justin Court
Moorpark, CA
Sent from Mail for Windows 10
84
From:Jennah Morgan
To:David Pollock; Douglas Spondello; Freddy Carrillo; Karen Vaughn; Roseann Mikos
Subject:In Favor- Beltramo Ranch community
Date:Monday, June 22, 2020 8:32:49 PM
From:
Jennah Morgan
12946 E vistapark Dr, Moorpark, CA
Moorpark Community & Economic Development Standing Committee
Councilmember Mikos and Councilmember Pollock
799 Moorpark Avenue
Moorpark, CA 93021
Re: General Plan Amendment Pre-Screening for Proposed Beltramo
Ranch Community
Honorable Councilmembers Mikos and Pollock:
As a Moorpark resident I want to express my support for the proposed Beltramo
Ranch community. The proposed community offers the City of Moorpark many
economic benefits much needed in the city including: entry level for-sale
housing, increased property and sales tax, and shoppers/diners to support our stores
and restaurants along Los Angeles Avenue. Additionally, 15% of the homes will
be made available to affordable for-sale buyers. This proposed development is the
right solution for the area and fits well with the adjacent uses.
In addition I personally owned ranch property in Moorpark for almost 8 years. I’m
very familiar with horses, arenas and farm type animals.
While I understand the neighbors not wanting development to take place on this
land, and I love the fact that they are grandfathered in to specific zones to have
farm animals, The area and location of this land really calls for something more.
The area is not rural Moorpark and practically speaking, the value development
would bring to the city out weighs the few houses that prefer to retain the rural feel.
I sympathize with your decision as it’s not an easy one. It’s definitely not a
position where you can please and satisfy all involved.
I would just ask you to consider the decision that is best for the city now and for the
future.
Out of all the spots in Moorpark that more housing is proposed or wanting to be
built.. this land is the BEST area for that.
85
For all of these reasons I support the redevelopment of property into the proposed
Beltramo Ranch community.
Sincerely,
Jennah Morgan
86
From:BH Janitorial Services
To:Planning
Cc:BH Janitorial Services Inc
Subject:"Opposition to General Plan Amendment for Beltramo Ranch"
Date:Monday, June 22, 2020 5:10:38 PM
June 21, 2020
Moorpark Community & Economic Development Standing Committee
Councilmembers Roseann Mikos and David Pollack
799 Moorpark Avenue
Moorpark, CA 93021
Re. General Plan Amendment Application for Proposed Beltramo Ranch Community
Honorable Councilmembers Roseann Mikos and David Pollack:
I am writing to express my deep concern about the proposed Warmington development on Los
Angeles Avenue between my HOA, Heather Glen, and the community around Maureen Lane.
Amending the Land Use Designation of the General Plan to shoe-horn this 102-unit development
into just 7.4 acres will irreversibly impact the quality of life for two long-time communities.
There are several reasons this project should not be permitted to move forward. Here are a
couple of the most concerning:
1. VIOLATION OF ELEMENT GOAL #5 and POLICY #5.2 FROM THE GENERAL PLAN
Both of the communities adjacent to the proposed development have long enjoyed the rural
character of this edge of Moorpark. People in the Maureen Lane community own horses and
other farm animals that will be traumatized by both the building process and the subsequent
proximity to such a densely populated area. We in Heather Glen appreciate being next to a rural
community that reminds us of Moorpark’s roots. For some of us, it’s the reason we chose this
location to buy our homes.
Granted, Heather Glen is designated High Density, but our community has little impact on the
Maureen Lane community because we are separated from each other by a wide swath of land
that includes Beltramo Ranch Road. This separation of residential from rural would be wiped out
by the Warmington development.
The clash between existing communities and the High Density Warmington development makes
the “new residential houses [in]compatible with the character of existing individual
neighborhoods.” It is also incompatible “with the scale and character of the surrounding
neighborhood.”
2. INCREASED TRAFFIC ON ALREADY CONGESTED #118
Another very serious concern is related to increased traffic. The backup at the intersection of Los
Angeles Avenue and Tierra Rejada is terrible at certain times of the day. This will only become
87
much worse once the already-approved 369-unit housing development on the east side of the
Maureen Lane community is built. To add several hundred MORE cars to that juncture will be a
nightmare.
3. INVASION OF PRIVACY AND BLOCKED SUNLIGHT FOR RESIDENTS OF ELDERBERRY
AVENUE
As the Warmington plan is currently envisioned, the new condos will be lined up just a few feet
from the back walls of the homes on the east side of Elderberry Avenue. The Beltramo units will
be several feet higher than the Elderberry Avenue homes and about 30’ tall, affording an easy
view into the bedroom and living area windows of those homes and blocking much needed
morning sunlight to plants and gardens in their back yards.
4. OVER-CROWDING OF MOORPARK HIGH SCHOOL
How can the high school accommodate the large number of additional students that will come
from two large new developments when the school is
currently at capacity with over 2000 students? (Let’s not even talk about COVID-19 social
distancing!)
As a citizen of Moorpark who loves this community and especially cherishes the ambiance and
character of the neighborhood I live in here, I urge the Committee and the Council to not approve
the General Plan Amendment requested by the Warmington Group. If the project appeals to you,
please find another parcel where it won’t impact the quality of life of people who have chosen
their homes for that very quality of life.
Thank you,
Josue Alberto Castillo Tabares
4704 Penrose Ave,
Moorpark, CA 93021
88
From:Kim Cook
To:David Pollock; Roseann Mikos
Cc:Douglas Spondello; Karen Vaughn; Freddy Carrillo
Subject:Support for the project of Beltramo Ranch community
Date:Tuesday, June 23, 2020 2:10:11 PM
Kim Cook
2148 Cutler St,
Simi Valley, CA 93065
June 22, 2020
Moorpark Community & Economic Development Standing Committee
Councilmember Mikos and Councilmember Pollock
799 Moorpark Avenue
Moorpark, CA 93021
Re: General Plan Amendment Pre-Screening for Proposed Beltramo Ranch Community
Honorable Councilmembers Mikos and Pollock:
As someone who works and shops in Moorpark I want to express my support for the proposed Beltramo Ranch community.
I feel this project has many benefits for the city of Moorpark and it's residents.
The project will offer housing opportunities for young people and younger families who are currently priced out of the housing
market in Moorpark. We want young people to have a place in in our city after graduating college or starting a family where
they
can be near their families in Moorpark.
In addition, the development will be more visually pleasing to people driving by on Los Angeles Ave.
For all of these reasons I support the redevelopment of property into the proposed Beltramo Ranch community.
Sincerely,
Kim Cook
89
From:Ryan Carr
To:Planning
Subject:Opposition to General Plan Amendment for Beltramo Ranch
Date:Monday, June 22, 2020 8:24:18 PM
Moorpark Community & Economic Development Standing Committee
Councilmembers Roseann Mikos and David Pollack
799 Moorpark Avenue
Moorpark, CA 93021
Re. General Plan Amendment Application for Proposed Beltramo Ranch Community
Honorable Councilmembers Roseann Mikos and David Pollack:
I am writing to express my deep concern about the proposed Warmington development on Los
Angeles Avenue between my HOA, Heather Glen, and the community around Maureen Lane.
Amending the Land Use Designation of the General Plan to shoe-horn this 102-unit development
into just 7.4 acres will irreversibly impact the quality of life for two long-time communities.
There are several reasons this project should not be permitted to move forward. Here are a
couple of the most concerning:
1. VIOLATION OF ELEMENT GOAL #5 and POLICY #5.2 FROM THE GENERAL PLAN
Both of the communities adjacent to the proposed development have long enjoyed the rural
character of this edge of Moorpark. People in the Maureen Lane community own horses and
other farm animals that will be traumatized by both the building process and the subsequent
proximity to such a densely populated area. We in Heather Glen appreciate being next to a rural
community that reminds us of Moorpark’s roots. For some of us, it’s the reason we chose this
location to buy our homes.
Granted, Heather Glen is designated High Density, but our community has little impact on the
Maureen Lane community because we are separated from each other by a wide swath of land
that includes Beltramo Ranch Road. This separation of residential from rural would be wiped out
by the Warmington development.
The clash between existing communities and the High Density Warmington development makes
the “new residential houses [in]compatible with the character of existing individual
neighborhoods.” It is also incompatible “with the scale and character of the surrounding
neighborhood.”
2. INCREASED TRAFFIC ON ALREADY CONGESTED #118
Another very serious concern is related to increased traffic. The backup at the intersection of Los
Angeles Avenue and Tierra Rejada is terrible at certain times of the day. This will only become
much worse once the already-approved 369-unit housing development on the east side of the
Maureen Lane community is built. To add several hundred MORE cars to that juncture will be a
90
nightmare.
3. INVASION OF PRIVACY AND BLOCKED SUNLIGHT FOR RESIDENTS OF ELDERBERRY
AVENUE
As the Warmington plan is currently envisioned, the new condos will be lined up just a few feet
from the back walls of the homes on the east side of Elderberry Avenue. The Beltramo units will
be several feet higher than the Elderberry Avenue homes and about 30’ tall, affording an easy
view into the bedroom and living area windows of those homes and blocking much needed
morning sunlight to plants and gardens in their back yards.
4. OVER-CROWDING OF MOORPARK HIGH SCHOOL
How can the high school accommodate the large number of additional students that will come
from two large new developments when the school is
currently at capacity with over 2000 students? (Let’s not even talk about COVID-19 social
distancing!)
As a citizen of Moorpark who loves this community and especially cherishes the ambiance and
character of the neighborhood I live in here, I urge the Committee and the Council to not approve
the General Plan Amendment requested by the Warmington Group. If the project appeals to you,
please find another parcel where it won’t impact the quality of life of people who have chosen
their homes for that very quality of life.
Thank you,
M. Ryan Carr
11837 Nightingale St.
Moorpark, CA 93021
91
From:Marco Della Ripa
To:Planning
Subject:Opposition to General Plan Amendment for Beltramo Ranch
Date:Monday, June 22, 2020 8:09:50 PM
June 22, 2020
Moorpark Community & Economic Development Standing Committee
Councilmembers Roseann Mikos and David Pollack
799 Moorpark Avenue
Moorpark, CA 93021
Re. General Plan Amendment Application for Proposed Beltramo Ranch Community
Honorable Councilmembers Roseann Mikos and David Pollack:
I am writing to express my deep concern about the proposed Warmington development on Los
Angeles Avenue between my HOA, Heather Glen, and the community around Maureen Lane.
Amending the Land Use Designation of the General Plan to shoe-horn this 102-unit development
into just 7.4 acres will irreversibly impact the quality of life for two long-time communities.
There are several reasons this project should not be permitted to move forward. Here are a
couple of the most concerning:
1. VIOLATION OF ELEMENT GOAL #5 and POLICY #5.2 FROM THE GENERAL PLAN
Both of the communities adjacent to the proposed development have long enjoyed the rural
character of this edge of Moorpark. People in the Maureen Lane community own horses and
other farm animals that will be traumatized by both the building process and the subsequent
proximity to such a densely populated area. We in Heather Glen appreciate being next to a rural
community that reminds us of Moorpark’s roots. For some of us, it’s the reason we chose this
location to buy our homes.
Granted, Heather Glen is designated High Density, but our community has little impact on the
Maureen Lane community because we are separated from each other by a wide swath of land
that includes Beltramo Ranch Road. This separation of residential from rural would be wiped out
by the Warmington development.
The clash between existing communities and the High Density Warmington development makes
the “new residential houses [in]compatible with the character of existing individual
neighborhoods.” It is also incompatible “with the scale and character of the surrounding
neighborhood.”
2. INCREASED TRAFFIC ON ALREADY CONGESTED #118
Another very serious concern is related to increased traffic. The backup at the intersection of Los
92
Angeles Avenue and Tierra Rejada is terrible at certain times of the day. This will only become
much worse once the already-approved 369-unit housing development on the east side of the
Maureen Lane community is built. To add several hundred MORE cars to that juncture will be a
nightmare.
3. INVASION OF PRIVACY AND BLOCKED SUNLIGHT FOR RESIDENTS OF ELDERBERRY
AVENUE
As the Warmington plan is currently envisioned, the new condos will be lined up just a few feet
from the back walls of the homes on the east side of Elderberry Avenue. The Beltramo units will
be several feet higher than the Elderberry Avenue homes and about 30’ tall, affording an easy
view into the bedroom and living area windows of those homes and blocking much needed
morning sunlight to plants and gardens in their back yards.
4. OVER-CROWDING OF MOORPARK HIGH SCHOOL
How can the high school accommodate the large number of additional students that will come
from two large new developments when the school is
currently at capacity with over 2000 students? (Let’s not even talk about COVID-19 social
distancing!)
As a citizen of Moorpark who loves this community and especially cherishes the ambiance and
character of the neighborhood I live in here, I urge the Committee and the Council to not approve
the General Plan Amendment requested by the Warmington Group. If the project appeals to you,
please find another parcel where it won’t impact the quality of life of people who have chosen
their homes for that very quality of life.
Thank you,
Marco Della Ripa
4725 Elderberry Ave
Moorpark, CA 93021
-- Marco Della Ripa805-551-5100marco.dellaripa@gmail.com
93
From:Mary Mercado
To:David Pollock; Roseann Mikos
Cc:Freddy Carrillo; Karen Vaughn; Douglas Spondello
Subject:General Plan Amendment Pre-Screening for Proposed Beltramo Ranch Community
Date:Monday, June 22, 2020 10:02:44 PM
June 22, 2020
Re: General Plan Amendment Pre-Screening for Proposed Beltramo Ranch Community
Honorable Councilmembers Mikos and Pollock:
I have been a resident of Moorpark for 17 years. I want to express my support for the proposed
Beltramo Ranch Community project. I believe this proposed community offers the City of Moorpark
many economic benefits. This project will increase property and sales tax and bring additional
shoppers/diners to support businesses in Moorpark. I believe this project is a great solution for the
area.
For all of these reasons I support the redevelopment of property into the proposed Beltramo Ranch
community.
Sincerely,
Mary Mercado
656 Charles St
Moorpark, CA 93021
94
From:Freddy Carrillo
To:Freddy Carrillo
Subject:FW: Beltramo Ranch development
Date:Tuesday, June 23, 2020 12:24:43 PM
From: sandra [mailto:nonnie5806@aol.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2020 11:39 AM
To: Planning
Subject: Beltramo Ranch developmentI am writing to express my deep concern about the proposed Warmington development on Los Angeles Avenue between my HOA, Heather Glen, and the community around Maureen Lane. Amending the Land Use Designation of the General Plan to shoe-horn this 102-unit development into just 7.4 acres will irreversibly impact the quality of life for two long-time communities.There are several reasons this project should not be permitted to move forward. Here are a couple of the most concerning:
1.VIOLATION OF ELEMENT GOAL #5 and POLICY #5.2 FROM THE GENERAL PLANBoth of the communities adjacent to the proposed development have long enjoyed the rural character of this edge of Moorpark. People in the Maureen Lane community own horses and other farm animals that will be traumatized by both the building process and the subsequent proximity to such a densely populated area. We in Heather Glen appreciate being next to a rural community that reminds us of Moorpark’s roots. For some of us, it’s the reason we chose this location to buy our homes.Granted, Heather Glen is designated High Density, but our community has little impact on the Maureen Lane community because we are separated from each other by a wide swath of land that includes Beltramo Ranch Road. This separation of residential from rural would be wiped out by the Warmington development.The clash between existing communities and the High Density Warmington development makes the “new residential houses [in]compatible with the character of existing individual neighborhoods.” It is also incompatible “with the scale and character of the surrounding neighborhood.”
2.INCREASED TRAFFIC ON ALREADY CONGESTED #118Another very serious concern is related to increased traffic. The backup at the intersection of Los Angeles Avenue and Tierra Rejada is terrible at certain times of the day. This will only become much worse once the already-approved housing development on the east side of the Maureen Lane community is built. To add several hundred MORE cars to that juncture will be a nightmare.
95
3. INVASION OF PRIVACY AND BLOCKED SUNLIGHT FOR RESIDENTS OF
ELDERBERRY AVENUE
As the Warmington plan is currently envisioned, the new condos will be lined up just a few feet from the back walls of the homes on the east side of Elderberry Avenue. The Beltramo units will be several feet higher than the Elderberry Avenue homes and about 30’ tall, affording an easy view into the bedroom and living area windows of those homes and blocking much need morning sunlight to plants and gardens in their back yards.
4. OVER-CROWDING OF MOORPARK HIGH SCHOOL
How can the high school accommodate the large number of additional students that will come from two large new developments when the school is currently at capacity with over 2000 students? (Let’s not even talk about COVID-19 social distancing!) As a citizen of Moorpark who loves this community and especially cherishes the ambiance and character of the neighborhood I live in here, I urge the Committee and the Council to not approve the General Plan Amendment requested by the Warmington Group. If the project appeals to you, please find another parcel where it won’t impact the quality of life of people who have chosen their homes for that very quality of life. Thank you, Maureen Baker4764 Penrose AvenueMoorpark, CA
96
From:Paul Farley
To:Planning
Subject:Pre-Screening Application No. 2019-02
Date:Tuesday, June 23, 2020 3:26:13 AM
Good Morning,
I wanted to express my concern regarding the pre-screening proposal before you. The goal of
the developer is to bundle a group of parcels to create an avenue for very high density
housing. I am aware of the need for affordable housing and that City of Moorpark is being
forced to try and do that in a hurry up fashion.
My concern is that the Maureen Lane neighborhood is zoned at 1/2 acre parcels. To be clear a
7 acre project would equate to 14 homes. That is how the bulk of the land that borders our
property lines is currently zoned. Only a small portion of this project currently has higher
density zoning. The higher zoned lot is the 2.59 acres west of Beltramo rd. The majority of
the land is low density single family residential @ 2/acre.
I think the density proposed does not really take into account the current living environment of
Maureen lane. I believe the density is too high. It would be my hope that the City would
dictate that at a minimum, whatever project happens, the developer be required to erect an 8'
high wall the length of the eastern boundary prior to any grading or demo of existing sites.
As we all know this proposed plan will be moving a lot of dirt to do underground way before
actual building construction begins.
I look forward to a productive dialog and working together towards a good project as we
move forward.
Thank you Moorpark Planning.
Respectfully,
Paul Farley
Maureen Lane Resident
97
From:Teri Zierenberg
To:Planning
Subject:Opposition to General Plan Amendment for Beltramo Ranch
Date:Monday, June 22, 2020 5:09:15 PM
June 21, 2020
Moorpark Community & Economic Development Standing Committee
Councilmembers Roseann Mikos and David Pollack
799 Moorpark Avenue
Moorpark, CA 93021
Re. General Plan Amendment Application for Proposed Beltramo Ranch Community
Honorable Councilmembers Roseann Mikos and David Pollack:
I am writing to express my deep concern about the proposed Warmington development on Los Angeles Avenue between my HOA, Heather Glen, and the community around Maureen Lane. Amending the Land Use
Designation of the General Plan to shoe-horn this 102-unit development into just 7.4 acres will irreversibly impact the quality of life for two long-time communities.
There are several reasons this project should not be permitted to move forward. Here are a couple of the most concerning:
1. VIOLATION OF ELEMENT GOAL #5 and POLICY #5.2 FROM THE GENERAL PLAN
Both of the communities adjacent to the proposed development have long enjoyed the rural character of this edge of Moorpark. People in the Maureen Lane community own horses and other farm animals that will be
traumatized by both the building process and the subsequent proximity to such a densely populated area. We in Heather Glen appreciate being next to a rural community that reminds us of Moorpark’s roots. For some of us,
it’s the reason we chose this location to buy our homes.
Granted, Heather Glen is designated High Density, but our community has little impact on the Maureen Lane community because we are separated from each other by a wide swath of land that includes Beltramo Ranch
Road. This separation of residential from rural would be wiped out by the Warmington development.
The clash between existing communities and the High Density Warmington development makes the “new residential houses [in]compatible with the character of existing individual neighborhoods.” It is also incompatible “with
the scale and character of the surrounding neighborhood.”
2. INCREASED TRAFFIC ON ALREADY CONGESTED #118
Another very serious concern is related to increased traffic. The backup at the intersection of Los Angeles Avenue and Tierra Rejada is terrible at certain times of the day. This will only become much worse once the already-
approved 369-unit housing development on the east side of the Maureen Lane community is built. To add several hundred MORE cars to that juncture will be a nightmare.
3. INVASION OF PRIVACY AND BLOCKED SUNLIGHT FOR RESIDENTS OF ELDERBERRY AVENUE
As the Warmington plan is currently envisioned, the new condos will be lined up just a few feet from the back walls of the homes on the east side of Elderberry Avenue. The Beltramo units will be several feet higher than the
Elderberry Avenue homes and about 30’ tall, affording an easy view into the bedroom and living area windows of those homes and blocking much needed morning sunlight to plants and gardens in their back yards.
4. OVER-CROWDING OF MOORPARK HIGH SCHOOL
How can the high school accommodate the large number of additional students that will come from two large new developments when the school is
currently at capacity with over 2000 students? (Let’s not even talk about COVID-19 social distancing!)
As a citizen of Moorpark who loves this community and especially cherishes the ambiance and character of the neighborhood I live in here, I urge the Committee and the Council to not approve the General Plan Amendment
requested by the Warmington Group. If the project appeals to you, please find another parcel where it won’t impact the quality of life of people who have chosen their homes for that very quality of life.
Thank you,
Shirley Williams
4780 Elderberry Ave.
Moorpark
98
I appreciate the opportunity to comment on this matter. While it's an
opportunity to provide additional residential units, as proposed the
project is not compatible with either of the existing adjacent
neighborhoods. The proposed project is too dense. Before this GPA
allowed to move forward, additional information about flood and
grading issues should be provided. The proposed pad height of the site
relative to the homes on Elderberry is very critical. If allowed to proceed
the project should be considered as High Density Residential with a
density of 7 DU per acre. As I recall this is the density of the Pacific
Communities Project to the east of the Maureen Lane neighborhood.
This density is more compatible with the adjacent neighborhoods.
My specific concerns with the proposal include the following items.
1. In addition to the Land Use Element Goals and Policies referenced in
the Staff Report there are other equally or more important Goals and
Policies relevant to this proposed project including A. Policy 1.1
"...compatible with the overall suburban rural community character". B.
Policy 4.1 " Residential character of identifiable neighborhoods shall be
maintained by requiring new development to have compatible ...
building setbacks and building heights." C. Policy 4.2 " Existing
neighborhoods shall be protected and preserved in order to maintain
their character and identity". Policy 5.1 " Multiple family dwellings shall
be developed ... with careful consideration of the proximity to and
compatibility with single family neighborhoods". ( The proposed project
does meet some of the criteria of this Policy related to location near jobs
and shopping.) D. Goal 16- "Enhance and maintain the suburban/rural
identity of the community." and Policy 16.1 " For each existing
neighborhood the overall theme and character shall be maintained or
enhanced. Development and/or infill projects shall be consistent with the
theme and character of the area."E. Goal 17- "Enhance the physical and
visual image of the community." and Policy 17.1 " New development
shall be compatible with the scale and visual character of the
surrounding neighborhood." and Policy 17.7 " Design features which
provide visual relief and separation shall be required between land uses
of conflicting character.
99
2. A project of 102 units with 15 affordable units is not in the big picture
all that critical to assist city in meeting its RHNA obligation. A project of
60 units on the site would yield only 6 fewer affordable units. Those 6
units ( or even 15 ) can be provided by other pending projects such as
Chiu ( 60 DU ), West Pointe / Rasmussen ( 138 DU ), Hitch Ranch (755
DU ), and city controlled properties in the downtown area ( 60-120
DU ). In addition, the pending updates to the Downtown Specific Plan
and Land Use and Housing Elements could add higher densities on
existing residential sites better suited for Very High density ( 15 DU per
acre )and allow conversion of some commercial sites to residential uses.
3.Though some features of the proposed project are typically not
evaluated in detail until a GPA is approved for processing some items
with a potentially significant impact should be evaluated before this
project is considered. For this proposed project these include flood zone
and related grading and final pad elevations. Both of these could have a
huge impact on the existing homes. I remind the Committee Members of
what occurred in the Canterbury Lane project a few years ago. The final
grading required as a result of flood studies which occurred after project
approvals significantly raised the pads above the existing homes on
Fremont Street. Even without this consideration the residents of both
neighborhoods should be told what the proposed pad heights are
compared to their existing adjacent lots so they can provide informed
comments at this time. At the Community meeting hosted by
Warmington Homes several months ago I requested this information be
provided prior to the community and Committee's consideration.
4. Other items of concern include A. potential emergency vehicle access
between this proposed project and Maureen Lane ( perhaps similar to
Home Acres Buffer which benefits both neighborhoods ); B. enhanced
setbacks from Los Angeles Avenue ; C. Sound wall extended west of
the project; D. Los Angeles Avenue impacts on proposed median and
location of proposed site access points: E. Reference to affordable units
includes low and moderate. City has historically only accepted units
affordable to low and very low income buyers to meet his requirement.
F. It should be clear that the proposed park is a private park for the
100
project only. G. The project should demonstrate no negative impact on
current flood map status on any other property. H. The existing
constraints such as utility easements and court granted easement on the
Beltramo Ranch property should have been addressed as part of this
GPA consideration. I. What is the planned disposition of the existing
overhead utility line on the site? J. The potential loss of property zoned
for horses and similar uses and related impact on the Maureen Lane
properties should be considered. City has added miles of multi -use trails
but has only about 250 lots presently zoned to permit horses and similar
uses.
In conclusion, this proposal should be continued until additional
information about flood and grading issues are provided. This will allow
the city and public to assess any impacts on the existing
neighborhoods. If this project is allowed to proceed with GPA
consideration it should be at High Density 7 DU per acre similar to the
approved Pacific Communities project to the east of Maureen Lane.
Thank you for considering my comments and concerns. Steve Kueny
101
From:Teri Zierenberg
To:Planning
Subject:Opposition to General Plan Amendment for Beltramo Ranch
Date:Monday, June 22, 2020 5:06:36 PM
June 21, 2020
Moorpark Community & Economic Development Standing Committee
Councilmembers Roseann Mikos and David Pollack
799 Moorpark Avenue
Moorpark, CA 93021
Re. General Plan Amendment Application for Proposed Beltramo Ranch Community
Honorable Councilmembers Roseann Mikos and David Pollack:
I am writing to express my deep concern about the proposed Warmington development on Los
Angeles Avenue between my HOA, Heather Glen, and the community around Maureen Lane.
Amending the Land Use Designation of the General Plan to shoe-horn this 102-unit development
into just 7.4 acres will irreversibly impact the quality of life for two long-time communities.
There are several reasons this project should not be permitted to move forward. Here are a
couple of the most concerning:
1. VIOLATION OF ELEMENT GOAL #5 and POLICY #5.2 FROM THE GENERAL PLAN
Both of the communities adjacent to the proposed development have long enjoyed the rural
character of this edge of Moorpark. People in the Maureen Lane community own horses and
other farm animals that will be traumatized by both the building process and the subsequent
proximity to such a densely populated area. We in Heather Glen appreciate being next to a rural
community that reminds us of Moorpark’s roots. For some of us, it’s the reason we chose this
location to buy our homes.
Granted, Heather Glen is designated High Density, but our community has little impact on the
Maureen Lane community because we are separated from each other by a wide swath of land
that includes Beltramo Ranch Road. This separation of residential from rural would be wiped out
by the Warmington development.
The clash between existing communities and the High Density Warmington development makes
the “new residential houses [in]compatible with the character of existing individual
neighborhoods.” It is also incompatible “with the scale and character of the surrounding
neighborhood.”
2. INCREASED TRAFFIC ON ALREADY CONGESTED #118
Another very serious concern is related to increased traffic. The backup at the intersection of Los
Angeles Avenue and Tierra Rejada is terrible at certain times of the day. This will only become
much worse once the already-approved 369-unit housing development on the east side of the
102
Maureen Lane community is built. To add several hundred MORE cars to that juncture will be a
nightmare.
3. INVASION OF PRIVACY AND BLOCKED SUNLIGHT FOR RESIDENTS OF ELDERBERRY
AVENUE
As the Warmington plan is currently envisioned, the new condos will be lined up just a few feet
from the back walls of the homes on the east side of Elderberry Avenue. The Beltramo units will
be several feet higher than the Elderberry Avenue homes and about 30’ tall, affording an easy
view into the bedroom and living area windows of those homes and blocking much needed
morning sunlight to plants and gardens in their back yards.
4. OVER-CROWDING OF MOORPARK HIGH SCHOOL
How can the high school accommodate the large number of additional students that will come
from two large new developments when the school is
currently at capacity with over 2000 students? (Let’s not even talk about COVID-19 social
distancing!)
As a citizen of Moorpark who loves this community and especially cherishes the ambiance and
character of the neighborhood I live in here, I urge the Committee and the Council to not approve
the General Plan Amendment requested by the Warmington Group. If the project appeals to you,
please find another parcel where it won’t impact the quality of life of people who have chosen
their homes for that very quality of life.
Thank you,
Teri & John Phillips
4744 Elderberry Ave
Moorpark
103
From:Vanessa Ponce
To:Planning
Subject:General Plan Amendment Application for Proposed Beltramo Ranch Community
Date:Monday, June 22, 2020 8:51:39 PM
Honorable Councilmembers Roseann Mikos and David Pollack:
I am writing to express my deep concern about the proposed Warmington development on Los
Angeles Avenue between my HOA, Heather Glen, and the community around Maureen Lane.
Amending the Land Use Designation of the General Plan to shoe-horn this 102-unit
development into just 7.4 acres will irreversibly impact the quality of life for two long-time
communities.
There are several reasons this project should not be permitted to move forward. Here are a
couple of the most concerning:
1. VIOLATION OF ELEMENT GOAL #5 and POLICY #5.2 FROM THE GENERAL
PLAN
Both of the communities adjacent to the proposed development have long enjoyed the rural
character of this edge of Moorpark. People in the Maureen Lane community own horses and
other farm animals that will be traumatized by both the building process and the subsequent
proximity to such a densely populated area. We in Heather Glen appreciate being next to a
rural community that reminds us of Moorpark’s roots. For some of us, it’s the reason we
chose this location to buy our homes.
Granted, Heather Glen is designated High Density, but our community has little impact on the
Maureen Lane community because we are separated from each other by a wide swath of land
that includes Beltramo Ranch Road. This separation of residential from rural would be wiped
out by the Warmington development.
The clash between existing communities and the High Density Warmington development
makes the “new residential houses [in]compatible with the character of existing individual
neighborhoods.” It is also incompatible “with the scale and character of the surrounding
neighborhood.”
2. INCREASED TRAFFIC ON ALREADY CONGESTED #118
Another very serious concern is related to increased traffic. The backup at the intersection of
Los Angeles Avenue and Tierra Rejada is terrible at certain times of the day. This will only
become much worse once the already-approved 369-unit housing development on the east
side of the Maureen Lane community is built. To add several hundred MORE cars to that
104
juncture will be a nightmare.
3. INVASION OF PRIVACY AND BLOCKED SUNLIGHT FOR RESIDENTS OF
ELDERBERRY AVENUE
As the Warmington plan is currently envisioned, the new condos will be lined up just a few
feet from the back walls of the homes on the east side of Elderberry Avenue. The Beltramo
units will be several feet higher than the Elderberry Avenue homes and about 30’ tall,
affording an easy view into the bedroom and living area windows of those homes and
blocking much needed morning sunlight to plants and gardens in their back yards.
4. OVER-CROWDING OF MOORPARK HIGH SCHOOL
How can the high school accommodate the large number of additional students that will come
from two large new developments when the school is
currently at capacity with over 2000 students? (Let’s not even talk about COVID-19 social
distancing!)
As a citizen of Moorpark who loves this community and especially cherishes the ambiance
and character of the neighborhood I live in here, I urge the Committee and the Council to not
approve the General Plan Amendment requested by the Warmington Group. If the project
appeals to you, please find another parcel where it won’t impact the quality of life of people
who have chosen their homes for that very quality of life.
Thank you,
Vanessa & Richard Ponce
4732 Elderberry Ave
Moorpark, CA 93021
105
From:ANGELA ZAPATA
To:Planning
Subject:Beltramo Plan - I oppose
Date:Wednesday, June 24, 2020 9:27:40 AM
June 21, 2020
Moorpark Community & Economic Development Standing Committee
Councilmembers Roseann Mikos and David Pollack
799 Moorpark Avenue
Moorpark, CA 93021
Re. General Plan Amendment Application for Proposed Beltramo Ranch Community
Honorable Councilmembers Roseann Mikos and David Pollack:
I am writing to express my deep concern about the proposed Warmington development on Los
Angeles Avenue between my HOA, Heather Glen, and the community around Maureen Lane.
Amending the Land Use Designation of the General Plan to shoe-horn this 102-unit development
into just 7.4 acres will irreversibly impact the quality of life for two long-time communities.
There are several reasons this project should not be permitted to move forward. Here are a
couple of the most concerning:
1. VIOLATION OF ELEMENT GOAL #5 and POLICY #5.2 FROM THE GENERAL PLAN
Both of the communities adjacent to the proposed development have long enjoyed the rural
character of this edge of Moorpark. People in the Maureen Lane community own horses and
other farm animals that will be traumatized by both the building process and the subsequent
proximity to such a densely populated area. We in Heather Glen appreciate being next to a rural
community that reminds us of Moorpark’s roots. For some of us, it’s the reason we chose this
location to buy our homes.
Granted, Heather Glen is designated High Density, but our community has little impact on the
Maureen Lane community because we are separated from each other by a wide swath of land
that includes Beltramo Ranch Road. This separation of residential from rural would be wiped out
by the Warmington development.
The clash between existing communities and the High Density Warmington development makes
the “new residential houses [in]compatible with the character of existing individual
neighborhoods.” It is also incompatible “with the scale and character of the surrounding
neighborhood.”
2. INCREASED TRAFFIC ON ALREADY CONGESTED #118
Another very serious concern is related to increased traffic. The backup at the intersection of Los
Angeles Avenue and Tierra Rejada is terrible at certain times of the day. This will only become
much worse once the already-approved 369-unit housing development on the east side of the
106
Maureen Lane community is built. To add several hundred MORE cars to that juncture will be a
nightmare.
3. INVASION OF PRIVACY AND BLOCKED SUNLIGHT FOR RESIDENTS OF ELDERBERRY
AVENUE
As the Warmington plan is currently envisioned, the new condos will be lined up just a few feet
from the back walls of the homes on the east side of Elderberry Avenue. The Beltramo units will
be several feet higher than the Elderberry Avenue homes and about 30’ tall, affording an easy
view into the bedroom and living area windows of those homes and blocking much needed
morning sunlight to plants and gardens in their back yards.
4. OVER-CROWDING OF MOORPARK HIGH SCHOOL
How can the high school accommodate the large number of additional students that will come
from two large new developments when the school is
currently at capacity with over 2000 students? (Let’s not even talk about COVID-19 social
distancing!)
As a citizen of Moorpark who loves this community and especially cherishes the ambiance and
character of the neighborhood I live in here, I urge the Committee and the Council to not approve
the General Plan Amendment requested by the Warmington Group. If the project appeals to you,
please find another parcel where it won’t impact the quality of life of people who have chosen
their homes for that very quality of life.
Thank you,
Angela Zapata
4779 Elderberry Ave
Moorpark, CA 93021
107
From:CAROLYN CARLSON
To:Planning
Date:Tuesday, June 23, 2020 3:53:13 PM
June 21, 2020
Moorpark Community & Economic Development Standing Committee
Councilmembers Roseann Mikos and David Pollack
799 Moorpark Avenue
Moorpark, CA 93021
Re. General Plan Amendment Application for Proposed Beltramo Ranch Community
Honorable Councilmembers Roseann Mikos and David Pollack:
I am writing to express my deep concern about the proposed Warmington development on Los
Angeles Avenue between my HOA, Heather Glen, and the community around Maureen Lane.
Amending the Land Use Designation of the General Plan to shoe-horn this 102-unit development
into just 7.4 acres will irreversibly impact the quality of life for two long-time communities.
There are several reasons this project should not be permitted to move forward. Here are a
couple of the most concerning:
1. VIOLATION OF ELEMENT GOAL #5 and POLICY #5.2 FROM THE GENERAL PLAN
Both of the communities adjacent to the proposed development have long enjoyed the rural
character of this edge of Moorpark. People in the Maureen Lane community own horses and
other farm animals that will be traumatized by both the building process and the subsequent
proximity to such a densely populated area. We in Heather Glen appreciate being next to a rural
community that reminds us of Moorpark’s roots. For some of us, it’s the reason we chose this
location to buy our homes.
Granted, Heather Glen is designated High Density, but our community has little impact on the
Maureen Lane community because we are separated from each other by a wide swath of land
that includes Beltramo Ranch Road. This separation of residential from rural would be wiped out
by the Warmington development.
The clash between existing communities and the High Density Warmington development makes
the “new residential houses [in]compatible with the character of existing individual
neighborhoods.” It is also incompatible “with the scale and character of the surrounding
neighborhood.”
2. INCREASED TRAFFIC ON ALREADY CONGESTED #118
Another very serious concern is related to increased traffic. The backup at the intersection of Los
Angeles Avenue and Tierra Rejada is terrible at certain times of the day. This will only become
much worse once the already-approved 369-unit housing development on the east side of the
108
Maureen Lane community is built. To add several hundred MORE cars to that juncture will be a
nightmare.
3. INVASION OF PRIVACY AND BLOCKED SUNLIGHT FOR RESIDENTS OF ELDERBERRY
AVENUE
As the Warmington plan is currently envisioned, the new condos will be lined up just a few feet
from the back walls of the homes on the east side of Elderberry Avenue. The Beltramo units will
be several feet higher than the Elderberry Avenue homes and about 30’ tall, affording an easy
view into the bedroom and living area windows of those homes and blocking much needed
morning sunlight to plants and gardens in their back yards.
4. OVER-CROWDING OF MOORPARK HIGH SCHOOL
How can the high school accommodate the large number of additional students that will come
from two large new developments when the school is
currently at capacity with over 2000 students? (Let’s not even talk about COVID-19 social
distancing!)
As a citizen of Moorpark who loves this community and especially cherishes the ambiance and
character of the neighborhood I live in here, I urge the Committee and the Council to not approve
the General Plan Amendment requested by the Warmington Group. If the project appeals to you,
please find another parcel where it won’t impact the quality of life of people who have chosen
their homes for that very quality of life.
Thank you,
Carolyn Carlson
4810 Elderberry Ave.
Moorpark, CA 93021
109
From:David McGarry
To:Planning
Cc:City Council & City Manager; Freddy Carrillo
Subject:General Plan Amendment Pre-Screening No. 2019-02
Date:Tuesday, June 23, 2020 6:18:39 PM
City of Moorpark
Moorpark City Council
Planning Department
I am writing to you today to express my opposition to the proposed change to the land use
designation for the property on the southeast corner of Los Angeles Avenue and Beltramo Rd.
The Warmington Group is asking the City of Moorpark to change the land use designation for this
property from its current status as High Density to Very High Density. I, and all my neighbors,
oppose this change. The General Plan already has designated this property as High Density. The
Heather Glen tract, on the west side of the new development, where I live on Elderberry Ave, is
designated as High Density. The neighborhood of Maureen Lane, on the east side of the new
development, is designated as Low or High Density (I couldn’t quite interpret the map).
My reasoning is as follows:
1. There is nothing wrong with the General Plan as is and there is no compelling reason to
change it.
2. Having a Very High Density development in between our two neighborhoods will most
certainly negatively affect our home values, especially for those of us that live on the east
side of Elderberry Ave.
3. With more people living in a confined area there is bound to be a higher noise level that will
affect the quality of life for the Elderberry residents.
Please consider our concerns. As you can imagine, there is a great deal of unrest among my
neighbors over any development. We are aware it isn’t practical to think we have the ability or right
to stop development of any kind, but we would at least like to have a voice as to how much we will
be impacted.
Thank you for your consideration.
David McGarry
4848 Elderberry Ave.
Moorpark, CA 93021
(805)791-1128
110
From:Frank Lagattuta
To:Planning
Subject:Overcrowding Concerns
Date:Tuesday, June 23, 2020 3:32:35 PM
Concerns about the proper spread of Very High Density Developments around the city of Moorpark.
Loading up a small area of the City with MORE High Density Homes will create significant traffic
concerns (both vehicle and foot) around the surrounding neighborhoods, Los Angeles Avenue,
Tierra Rejada and Glenwood Park.
Sent from Mail for Windows 10
111
June 21, 2020
Moorpark Community & Economic Development Standing Committee
Councilmembers Roseann Mikos and David Pollack
799 Moorpark Avenue
Moorpark, CA 93021
Re. General Plan Amendment Application for Proposed Beltramo Ranch Community
Honorable Councilmembers Roseann Mikos and David Pollack:
I am writing to express my deep concern about the proposed Warmington development on Los Angeles
Avenue between my HOA, Heather Glen, and the community around Maureen Lane. Amending the Land
Use Designation of the General Plan to shoe-horn this 102-unit development into just 7.4 acres will
irreversibly impact the quality of life for two long-time communities.
There are several reasons this project should not be permitted to move forward. Here are a couple of
the most concerning:
1. VIOLATION OF ELEMENT GOAL #5 and POLICY #5.2 FROM THE GENERAL PLAN
Both of the communities adjacent to the proposed development have long enjoyed the rural character
of this edge of Moorpark. People in the Maureen Lane community own horses and other farm animals
that will be traumatized by both the building process and the subsequent proximity to such a densely
populated area. We in Heather Glen appreciate being next to a rural community that reminds us of
Moorpark’s roots. For some of us, it’s the reason we chose this location to buy our homes.
Granted, Heather Glen is designated High Density, but our community has little impact on the Maureen
Lane community because we are separated from each other by a wide swath of land that includes
Beltramo Ranch Road. This separation of residential from rural would be wiped out by the Warmington
development.
The clash between existing communities and the Very High Density Warmington development makes
the “new residential houses [in]compatible with the character of existing individual neighborhoods.” It
is also incompatible “with the scale and character of the surrounding neighborhood.”
2. INCREASED TRAFFIC ON ALREADY CONGESTED #118
Another very serious concern is related to increased traffic. The backup at the intersection of Los
Angeles Avenue and Tierra Rejada is terrible at certain times of the day. This will only become much
worse once the already-approved 369-unit housing development on the east side of the Maureen Lane
community is built. To add several hundred, Maybe A Thousand, MORE cars to that juncture will be a
nightmare.
3. INVASION OF PRIVACY AND BLOCKED SUNLIGHT FOR RESIDENTS OF ELDERBERRY AVENUE
As the Warmington plan is currently envisioned, the new condos will be lined up just a few feet from the
back walls of the homes on the east side of Elderberry Avenue. The Beltramo units will be several feet
higher than the Elderberry Avenue homes and about 30’ tall, affording an easy view into the bedroom
and living area windows of those homes and blocking much needed morning sunlight to plants and
gardens in their back yards.
112
4. OVER-CROWDING OF MOORPARK HIGH SCHOOL
How can the high school accommodate the large number of additional students that will come from two
large new developments when the school is currently at capacity with over 2000 students? (Let’s not
even talk about COVID-19 social distancing!)
As a citizen of Moorpark who loves this community and especially cherishes the ambiance and character
of the neighborhood I live in here, I urge the Committee and the Council to not approve the General
Plan Amendment requested by the Warmington Group. If the project appeals to you, please find
another parcel where it won’t impact the quality of life of people who have chosen their homes for that
very quality of life.
Thank you,
Joseph Kastelic
4735 Justin Court
Moorpark, CA 93021
805 795-0512
kastelic@impulse.net
113
From:Laura Hansen
To:Planning; Linda Hofer
Subject:Re: Re. General Plan Amendment Application for Proposed Beltramo Ranch Community
Date:Wednesday, June 24, 2020 2:57:05 PM
I have not received any confirmation from the city. I plan on joining the zoom meeting, and I
had requested to speak. Please confirm.
On Mon, Jun 22, 2020 at 12:35 PM Laura Hansen <laurahansen2009@gmail.com> wrote:
Honorable Councilmembers Roseann Mikos and David Pollack:
I am writing to express my deep concern and apprehension about the proposed Warmington
development on Los Angeles Avenue between our HOA, Heather Glen, and the community
around Maureen Lane. Amending the Land Use Designation of the General Plan to allow this
102-unit development in this small space will irreversibly impact the quality of life for our
community.
There are several reasons this project should not be permitted to move forward. Here are a
couple of the most concerning:
1. VIOLATION OF ELEMENT GOAL #5 and POLICY #5.2 FROM THE GENERAL PLAN
Both of the communities adjacent to the proposed development have long enjoyed the rural
character of this edge of Moorpark. People in the Maureen Lane community own horses and
other farm animals that will be traumatized by both the building process and the subsequent
proximity to such a densely populated area. We in Heather Glen appreciate being next to a
rural community that reminds us of Moorpark’s roots. For some of us, it’s the reason we chose
this location to buy our homes.
The clash between existing communities and the High Density Warmington development makes
the “new residential houses incompatible with the character of existing individual
neighborhoods. It is also incompatible with the surrounding neighborhoods.
2. INCREASED TRAFFIC ON ALREADY CONGESTED #118
Another very serious concern is related to increased traffic. The backup at the intersection of
Los Angeles Avenue and Tierra Rejada is terrible at certain times of the day. This will become
much worse once the new housing development on the east side of the Maureen Lane
community is built. To add several hundred MORE cars to that intersection will be a nightmare.
3. INVASION OF PRIVACY AND BLOCKED SUNLIGHT FOR RESIDENTS OF
ELDERBERRY AVENUE
These new condos will be too close to the back walls of the homes on the east side of
Elderberry Avenue. The height of the Beltramo units is incompatible with the ajdacent
Elderberry Avenue homes, affording an easy view into the bedroom and living area windows of
those homes.
114
The height of the buildings will block sunlight to the homes and backyards, making those homes
dark and dreary.
4. OVERCROWDING OF MOORPARK SCHOOLS
The high density of the project will impact our school community, especially considering
the development on the other side of Maureen Lane.
I have lived in the Heather Glen community for almost twenty years. This development will
seriously degrade our quality of life.
I urge the Committee and the Council to disallow the General Plan Amendment requested by
the Warmington Group. The project should be relocated to another parcel where it won’t impact
the quality of life of people who already live here, or the height of the development should be
restricted and the location of the buildings on each lot modified to allow more room between the
new development and existing homes.
Thank you,
Laura Hansen
4713 Elderberry Ave.
Mooropark
(Also own 4708 Elderberry Ave., directly adjacent to the new development.)
--
Laura Hansen
805.231.4206
--
Laura Hansen
805.231.4206
115
From:Becky
To:Planning
Subject:Beltramo Ranch RD project
Date:Wednesday, June 24, 2020 12:11:35 PM
Mark and BECKY RITCHIE, 4719 Maureen Lane, Mrpk. My first concern is that as a “rural” street, Maureen Lane
does not need 102 units...very high density...built on top of us! By the time the builder uses fill dirt and then builds
garages with 2 story condos....those could be 20 ft ABOVE the current houses on Maureen! My 2nd concern is the
proposed park at the end of the project. This would put 2 parks side by side and I feel would encourage usage
detrimental to our rural neighborhood! Thirdly, we are owners of most of the private road known as Loretta Dr and
it CANNOT support any thru traffic. If the plan includes it being used for any emergency thru traffic, we would
NOT be in favor of it! LA Ave has more than enough traffic now, add to this approx 2 cars (?) per household at 102
units....that’s adding over 200 vehicles onto an already over congested, over signaled state highway!!!!! This
highway already has numerous accidents, more traffic would mean more!!! We are not at the mtg in person because
of COVID-19 and being in the high risk category, this is unfair and the meeting should be rescheduled when ALL
can attend! Thank you, Mark and BECKY Ritchie
Sent from my iPhone
116
From:Max Ghenis
To:Planning
Subject:Please approve the General Plan Amendment at Beltramo Ranch
Date:Wednesday, June 24, 2020 11:50:48 AM
Councilmembers Mikos and Pollack,
Our community is experiencing a historic economic recession and housing shortage.
California has fewer housing units per adult than any other state, causing overcrowded homes
that worsens the spread of the coronavirus. We also have the highest poverty rate thanks to
high housing costs, and while we might have less crowded freeways for the time being, as the
economy recovers, more will again be forced to commute long distances due to sprawl,
harming quality of life and the environment.
Projects like the 102 townhomes at Beltramo Ranch can address each of these issues. It will
create jobs we can't afford to lose; it will enable more families to have their own home
without sharing cramped quarters; it will provide more families the opportunity to live in
vibrant, beautiful areas like Moorpark, without spending $1 million or more for a single-
family home (especially the 15 low-income families who would be able to live in the
complex).
Please approve the General Plan Amendment to make Moorpark more inclusive, sustainable,
safe, and economically active.
Thank you,
Max Ghenis
117
From:Mindy Greenberg
To:Planning
Subject:Please approve the General Plan Amendment at Beltramo Ranch
Date:Wednesday, June 24, 2020 1:54:12 PM
Councilmembers Mikos and Pollack,
Our community is experiencing a historic economic recession and housing shortage.
California has fewer housing units per adult than any other state, causing overcrowded homes
that worsens the spread of the coronavirus. We also have the highest poverty rate thanks to
high housing costs, and while we might have less crowded freeways for the time being, as the
economy recovers, more will again be forced to commute long distances due to sprawl,
harming quality of life and the environment.
Projects like the 102 townhomes at Beltramo Ranch can address each of these issues. It will
create jobs we can't afford to lose; it will enable more families to have their own home
without sharing cramped quarters; it will provide more families the opportunity to live in
vibrant, beautiful areas like Moorpark, without spending $1 million or more for a single-
family home (especially the 15 low-income families who would be able to live in the
complex).
Please approve the General Plan Amendment to make Moorpark more inclusive, sustainable,
safe, and economically active.
Thanks, Mindy Greenberg
118
From:Patricia Martin
To:Planning
Subject:Community Dev. Beltramo Ranch Site
Date:Wednesday, June 24, 2020 10:58:21 AM
Hello,
Our concern is still the traffic amount of 102 units multiply that by at least 2-3 cars per
household. If it were in your neighborhood, would you be concern? We are!
Thank you
Patty and Dan Martin
Patty Martin,COTA/L
Ventura County Selpa
pmartin@vcoe.org
805-551-3152
119
From:owltowing@aol.com
To:Planning
Subject:Opposition to General Plan Amendment for Beltramo Ranch
Date:Wednesday, June 24, 2020 9:16:56 AM
Hello,
Moorpark Community & Economic Development Standing Committee
Councilmembers Roseann Mikos and David Pollack
799 Moorpark Avenue
Moorpark, CA 93021
Re. General Plan Amendment Application for Proposed Beltramo Ranch
Community
Honorable Councilmembers Roseann Mikos and David Pollack:
I am writing to express my deep concern about the proposed Warmington
development on Los Angeles Avenue between my HOA, Heather Glen, and the
community around Maureen Lane. Amending the Land Use Designation of the
General Plan to shoe-horn this 102-unit development into just 7.4 acres will
irreversibly impact the quality of life for two long-time communities.
There are several reasons this project should not be permitted to move forward. Here
are a couple of the most concerning:
1. VIOLATION OF ELEMENT GOAL #5 and POLICY #5.2 FROM THE GENERAL
PLAN
Both of the communities adjacent to the proposed development have long enjoyed
the rural character of this edge of Moorpark. People in the Maureen Lane community
own horses and other farm animals that will be traumatized by both the building
process and the subsequent proximity to such a densely populated area. We in
Heather Glen appreciate being next to a rural community that reminds us of
Moorpark’s roots. For some of us, it’s the reason we chose this location to buy our
homes.
Granted, Heather Glen is designated High Density, but our community has little
impact on the Maureen Lane community because we are separated from each other
by a wide swath of land that includes Beltramo Ranch Road. This separation of
residential from rural would be wiped out by the Warmington development.
The clash between existing communities and the High Density Warmington
development makes the “new residential houses [in]compatible with the character of
existing individual neighborhoods.” It is also incompatible “with the scale and
120
character of the surrounding neighborhood.”
2. INCREASED TRAFFIC ON ALREADY CONGESTED #118
Another very serious concern is related to increased traffic. The backup at the
intersection of Los Angeles Avenue and Tierra Rejada is terrible at certain times of
the day. This will only become much worse once the already-approved 369-unit
housing development on the east side of the Maureen Lane community is built. To
add several hundred MORE cars to that juncture will be a nightmare.
3. INVASION OF PRIVACY AND BLOCKED SUNLIGHT FOR RESIDENTS OF
ELDERBERRY AVENUE
As the Warmington plan is currently envisioned, the new condos will be lined up just a
few feet from the back walls of the homes on the east side of Elderberry Avenue. The
Beltramo units will be several feet higher than the Elderberry Avenue homes and
about 30’ tall, affording an easy view into the bedroom and living area windows of
those homes and blocking much needed morning sunlight to plants and gardens in
their back yards.
4. OVER-CROWDING OF MOORPARK HIGH SCHOOL
How can the high school accommodate the large number of additional students that
will come from two large new developments when the school is
currently at capacity with over 2000 students? (Let’s not even talk about COVID-19
social distancing!)
As a citizen of Moorpark who loves this community and especially cherishes the
ambiance and character of the neighborhood I live in here, I urge the Committee and
the Council to not approve the General Plan Amendment requested by the
Warmington Group. If the project appeals to you, please find another parcel where it
won’t impact the quality of life of people who have chosen their homes for that very
quality of life.
Thank you,
Delivered by HOA Express | Contact preferences | Privacy
Thank you,
Pete Gonzalez
11807 Nightingale St.- Moorpark
gonzalez1268@yahoo.com
121
From:Cindy Ake
To:Planning
Subject:Opposition to General Plan Amendment for Beltramo Ranch
Date:Tuesday, June 23, 2020 10:55:26 PM
Honorable Councilmembers Roseann Mikos and David Pollack:
I am writing to express my deep concern about the proposed Warmington development on Los
Angeles Avenue between my HOA, Heather Glen, and the community around Maureen Lane.
Amending the Land Use Designation of the General Plan to shoe-horn this 102-unit development
into just 7.4 acres will irreversibly impact the quality of life for two long-time communities.
There are several reasons this project should not be permitted to move forward. Here are a
couple of the most concerning:
1. VIOLATION OF ELEMENT GOAL #5 and POLICY #5.2 FROM THE GENERAL PLAN
Both of the communities adjacent to the proposed development have long enjoyed the rural
character of this edge of Moorpark. People in the Maureen Lane community own horses and
other farm animals that will be traumatized by both the building process and the subsequent
proximity to such a densely populated area. We in Heather Glen appreciate being next to a rural
community that reminds us of Moorpark’s roots. For some of us, it’s the reason we chose this
location to buy our homes.
Granted, Heather Glen is designated High Density, but our community has little impact on the
Maureen Lane community because we are separated from each other by a wide swath of land
that includes Beltramo Ranch Road. This separation of residential from rural would be wiped out
by the Warmington development.
The clash between existing communities and the High Density Warmington development makes
the “new residential houses [in]compatible with the character of existing individual
neighborhoods.” It is also incompatible “with the scale and character of the surrounding
neighborhood.”
2. INCREASED TRAFFIC ON ALREADY CONGESTED #118
Another very serious concern is related to increased traffic. The backup at the intersection of Los
Angeles Avenue and Tierra Rejada is terrible at certain times of the day. This will only become
much worse once the already-approved 369-unit housing development on the east side of the
Maureen Lane community is built. To add several hundred MORE cars to that juncture will be a
nightmare.
3. INVASION OF PRIVACY AND BLOCKED SUNLIGHT FOR RESIDENTS OF ELDERBERRY
AVENUE
As the Warmington plan is currently envisioned, the new condos will be lined up just a few feet
from the back walls of the homes on the east side of Elderberry Avenue. The Beltramo units will
122
be several feet higher than the Elderberry Avenue homes and about 30’ tall, affording an easy
view into the bedroom and living area windows of those homes and blocking much needed
morning sunlight to plants and gardens in their back yards.
4. OVER-CROWDING OF MOORPARK HIGH SCHOOL
How can the high school accommodate the large number of additional students that will come
from two large new developments when the school is
currently at capacity with over 2000 students? (Let’s not even talk about COVID-19 social
distancing!)
As a citizen of Moorpark who loves this community and especially cherishes the ambiance and
character of the neighborhood I live in here, I urge the Committee and the Council to not approve
the General Plan Amendment requested by the Warmington Group. If the project appeals to you,
please find another parcel where it won’t impact the quality of life of people who have chosen
their homes for that very quality of life.
Please don’t!
Thank you,
Rock & Cynthia Ake
11852 Nightingale St
Moorpark
Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPad
123
From:Freddy Carrillo
To:Freddy Carrillo
Subject:FW: Opposition to the proposed development of Beltramo Ranch
Date:Wednesday, June 24, 2020 10:14:07 AM
From: Tyler Smith [mailto:tylersmith2214@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2020 10:33 PM
To: Planning; City Council & City Manager
Subject: Opposition to the proposed development of Beltramo Ranch
City of Moorpark
Community Development Department
Community and Economic Development Standing Committee
799 Moorpark Ave,
Moorpark, CA 93021
To the Planning Department of the City of Moorpark:
As residents and homeowners in Moorpark, we are writing to express our strong opposition to the
proposed rezoning and development of the Beltramo Ranch Community. As residents living on the east
side of Elderberry Avenue this development has a significant negative impact on our property value and
our community. These new units have a building height of 35' and the foundation would already start
several feet higher than where our homes sit. The development of this community and the units within it
would therefore completely block our view, destroy our privacy, and create noise and light pollution.
Many of us bought our homes because the empty belt of space behind us gives us the privacy and lack
of traffic we wanted for raising our families.
The properties east of the proposed development enjoy low density zoning and low traffic. This
development completely changes the characteristic of that neighborhood as well.
An additional 256 parking spaces means at least that many cars making unprotected turns in and out of
that extremely dense community. This is less safe for pedestrian and motor vehicle traffic, and puts our
families and children in greater danger due to the significant increase in vehicle traffic. The additional
noise and pollution from that traffic further reduces quality of life for those of us who live adjacent to the
development.
Additionally, there is nothing wrong with the General Plan as is and no mistake was made in the current
“Low Density” and “High Density” designations. There is no reason to make a change to the General
Plan to Very High Density which would allow a new development to be built between our small
neighborhood and large lot single family homes on Maureen Lane. More significantly, the current
General Plan states that the land use designation should not be changed unless there is an error in the
plan. The “Low Density” designation for the Maureen Lane neighborhood was intentional and no mistake
was made, as that area is limited to a very low number of large single family homes. Additionally, the
“High Density” designation of the Heatherglen neighborhood was intentional and no mistake was made,
as this area contains a small park and limited number of townhouse-style homes.
Furthermore, there is evidence that the area was intentionally NOT designated as Very High Density
since the land is adjacent to an extremely busy, main road that is heavily trafficked by semi trucks.
Adding a very highly populated community, all of whose residents would need to enter and leave the
neighborhood via Los Angeles Avenue, significantly increases the risk of deadly traffic accidents. The
construction, density, and potential consequences of additional traffic in these two neighborhoods
indicates that the current designations were intentional and therefore must not be changed.
124
For these reasons and more we write our strong opposition to the rezoning to Very High Density
Residential for this development.
Sincerely,
Tyler and Carli Smith
4784 Elderberry Ave
Moorpark, CA 93021
125
COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT STANDING COMMITTEE
AGENDA REPORT
TO: Community and Economic Development Standing Committee
(Councilmember Mikos and Councilmember Pollock)
FROM: Karen Vaughn, Community Development Director
BY: Shanna Farley-Judkins, Principal Planner
DATE: 09/16/2020 Special Meeting
SUBJECT: Consider Revised General Plan Amendment Pre-Screening
Application No. 2019-02 to Allow a General Plan Amendment
Application to be Filed to Change the Land Use Designation from
Low Density Residential (L), High Density Residential (H) and Open
Space and Recreation (P) to Very High Density Residential (VH) for
the Development of a 69-Unit Residential Project located on 7.4
Acres of Property at the Southeast Corner of Los Angeles Avenue
and Beltramo Ranch Road, on the Application of Jay Deckard (for
Warmington Group)
BACKGROUND
On November 21, 2019, Jay Deckard for Warmington Group filed a General Plan
Amendment Pre-Screening application to change the land use designation of 7.4 acres
of land at the southeast corner of Los Angeles Avenue and Beltramo Ranch Road from
Low Density Residential (L), High Density Residential (H) and Open Space and
Recreation (P) to Very High Density Residential (VH) for the development of a 102-unit
residential condominium project and associated site improvements, collectively referred
to as “Beltramo Ranch”.
The Community and Economic Development Standing Committee (CEDC)
(Councilmembers Mikos and Pollock) considered this application on June 24, 2020.
The CEDC agenda report from June 24, 2020 is attached to provide analysis and
background information regarding the project (Attachment A). Prior to the CEDC
meeting, the City received 54 comment letters; 47 generally opposed the project and
seven supported the project. At the CEDC meeting, 21 individuals spoke during the
Item: 4.A.
ATTACHMENT 3
126
public comment period; most generally expressed concerns about the proposed project
and two speakers expressed support for the project. The public’s concerns mostly
addressed the proposed very high density designation compared to the existing lower
density of the surrounding neighborhoods. The speakers also identified concerns for
increased traffic impacts, close proximity of proposed units to existing residences,
continued access to the Arroyo Simi, public access through adjacent neighborhoods,
height of structures, flooding, and general incompatibility with the surrounding rural
neighborhood, etc. The CEDC guided the applicant to engage with the community and
work to better address the neighbor’s concerns, highlighting neighborhood concerns
associated with compatibility and density. The CEDC also asked the applicant to
consider concerns related to the flood zone, access to Arroyo Simi and potential
greenway trail, and to provide setbacks and buffers more consistent with the character
of the adjacent neighboring lots. The CEDC continued the item to their September 16,
2020 meeting.
DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
Revised Proposed Development:
Following the June 24, 2020 CEDC meeting the applicant held three in-person and
three virtual-online meetings with residents from adjacent neighborhoods to discuss the
project and receive community feedback.
On August 13, 2020, the applicant submitted revised application materials. The
applicant prepared revised plans and project description, which are included as
Attachment B and C. The applicant prepared a summary of the input received and the
resulting revisions to the site plan (Attachment D, Qualitative Design Input Findings &
Site Plan Modifications Implemented). The document also summarizes the
modifications made in response to the comments provided at the CEDC meeting. Key
components that were addressed in the revised project scope include reduced project
density, increased property line setbacks, reduced building height, and general
revisions to address concerns regarding privacy, views, shade, architecture, product
type, community character, open space/trail connections, parking, traffic, and
emergency access. The applicant prepared the Project Comparison Summary Matrix,
which is included as Table 1 of Attachment D.
Density
The revised project scope includes 69-units, as compared to 102-units in the earlier
proposal. This represents a 32% reduction in the total units proposed. The revised
density is 9.3 dwelling units per acre (du/ac), as compared to the earlier proposed 13.8
du/ac. The revised project features a mix of unit types, including 47 detached single-
family homes and 22 attached duplex homes, as compared to the earlier plan, which
consisted exclusively of attached townhomes.
127
Building Design and Height
The layout of the site changed from an attached townhome design to a detached and
evenly distributed single-family style model and duplex units, with private yards. The
maximum height of the proposed residences was reduced from a 30 feet to 26 feet for
single-family units and 29 feet for duplex units. Conceptual building section drawings
exemplify the height and setbacks of the proposed buildings from the property line and
existing neighboring structures have also been included with the revised project plans
(Attachment B). The sections also illustrate the proposed grade of the subject property
as well as the existing grade of adjacent lots.
Site Layout
The revised site design also removed all units out of the southern “pan-handle” area of
the site. The project reserves the whole of the approximately 45,000 square-foot, “pan-
handle” area as a park; previously the applicant proposed a 20,000 square-foot park
area. The revised application does not define the specific layout or use of the park
area. If the pre-screening application is acceptable to the City Council the formal
application for the development will include more information about the proposed use
and programming of the park. The revised site layout also created a looped road, which
creates an increased setback between existing neighboring residences and new homes.
The loop road provides approximately 50 to 60 feet between existing structures and
new homes. In the prior submittal, the homes along the western boundary were
approximately 20 to 30 feet away from existing homes to the west. Landscaping and
trees are placed along the outer boundaries of the project site. Together, the road and
landscaping provide additional separation between existing and proposed development.
Parking
The project’s parking requirement was recalculated due to the change in unit types and
the overall reduction in the number of units. The original application included 256
parking spaces, of which 204 spaces were within private garages and 51 spaces
available for guests. The revised project includes 220 parking spaces, of which 138
spaces would be within private garages, 47 spaces within private uncovered driveway
spaces and 35 uncovered guest parking spaces. Pursuant to Municipal Code Sections
17.32.020.B.3-4, the project requires 138 garage parking spaces. The project meets
this minimum parking requirement and the 47 parking spaces provided in driveways and
the 35 parking spaces in the common areas would be in excess of the required parking
standard. The guest parking reduction is due to the shift away from a multi-family
project, which requires guest parking spaces, to a single-family and duplex project,
which does not require guest parking spaces. Previously, guest parking had been
located along the eastern property boundary. The revised plan indicates 14 guest
parking spaces located along the western side of the project site and the remaining 21
guest spaces located throughout the residential lots. On-street parking is not been
provided on either the original or revised site plans.
128
Access
The applicant revised the project’s site access. The original site plan provided two
access road entrances along the northern property boundary, both intersecting Los
Angeles Avenue. Due to a reduction in units and the reduced distance between the
most distant residences from the Los Angeles Avenue entrance, only one access road
is now proposed. The applicant will continue to work with Caltrans and Ventura County
Fire Department to ensure the proposed access points comply with each agency’s
requirements. The project maintains internal pedestrian and vehicle access routes
along the proposed park area.
General Plan Amendment
The application continues to request a General Plan Amendment (GPA) to change the
land use designation from Low Density Residential (L), High Density Residential (H),
and Open Space Recreation (P) to Very High Density Residential (VH), which allows for
a maximum density of 15 units per acre. The earlier submittal proposed a density of
13.8 units per acre, while the revised proposal is at a density of 9.3 units per acre.
Although the Land Use Designation would remain VH, the actual density of the project
is reduced by roughly 32%.
General Plan Amendment Analysis
The proposed VH designation is intended for residential development characterized by
multiple family attached units, apartment and condominium buildings. It is intended that
this category utilize innovative site planning, provide onsite recreational amenities and
be located in close proximity to major community facilities, business centers and major
arterials.
The earlier project scope included specified affordable housing unit types and amounts.
Although the unit affordability types and number of units was based on the common
application of affordability required by the City, such analysis is not pertinent to the
matter before the CEDC. The affordable housing required of a project will be negotiated
through the Development Agreement process, which would be conducted in the future
should this application be allowed to proceed. Therefore, the specific quantity, type,
and method for providing affordable housing would be considered at a future time.
General Plan Goal and Policy Analysis
The design of the Project is conceptual at this time; however, the Goals and Policies
from the City’s General Plan are relevant to the project. Various Goals and Policies are
outlined in the Agenda Report from June 24, 2020 (Attachment A), which generally
encourage a variety of housing types, for all economic segments of the community.
Goals and policies encourage incorporation of affordable housing affordable to very low-
, low-, and moderate-income households. The General Plan also encourages infill
development, which is compatible with the scale and character of surrounding
neighborhoods.
129
In addition, to the Project’s ability to implement the various Goals and Policies of the
General Plan, the proposed General Plan Amendment could also facilitate additional
housing units required by the State Housing and Community Development Department
(HCD). The HCD determines the regional housing needs of the State, based primarily
on income categories, which produces the Regional Housing Needs Assessment
(RHNA). The RHNA assessment is passed down to local council of governments
(COGs), which work to divide the RHNA allocation by the jurisdictions within that COG.
Moorpark is of the Southern California Associations of Governments (SCAG), the local
COG representing Ventura, Los Angeles, Imperial, Orange, Riverside, and San
Bernardino County and cities. Currently, SCAG is in the process of updating the 6th
Cycle RHNA allocations.
Based on permitted units as of the close of 2019, and the City’s current (5th Cycle,
2014-2021) RHNA obligation, 637 additional units would need to be permitted by 2021.
This would include 274 very low-, 158 low- and 205 moderate-income units. The
current proposal of 69 units would help to offset the RHNA allocation, depending on the
provision of affordable housing negotiated into the Development Agreement. Pending
(6th Cycle, 2021-2029) RHNA allocations are estimated for Moorpark to include 1,288
units, will require additional units be constructed and therefore there will continue to be
a need to meet the allocations for the coming future and projects of this density may
assist the City with meeting the RHNA allocation.
PROCESSING TIME LIMITS FOR A GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT PRE-
SCREENING APPLICATION (CYCLE 1)
The General Plan Amendment Pre-Screening Application Review Procedures requires
the CEDC to make a recommendation to the City Council no later than the following
March regular meeting. A public hearing held by the City Council will need to occur no
later than the second regular meeting in May to determine whether a General Plan
Amendment application may be filed. However, due to the coronavirus pandemic and
local health emergency, the CEDC meeting scheduled for March 18, 2020 was
cancelled and the application was unable to meet the Cycle 1 timeframe. On May 13,
2020, the City Council allowed the General Plan Pre-Screening requested by the
applicant to move forward to the CEDC and City Council off-schedule from the normal
cycle timelines. The CEDC first met on June 24, 2020, continuing the review of revised
plans to September 16, 2020. Following action of the CEDC, it is anticipated that the
General Plan Amendment Pre-Screening Application No. 2019-02 will be presented to
City Council by the end of 2020.
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
A GPA Pre-Screening application does not involve any approval action and is therefore
not subject to environmental review pursuant to the California Environmental Quality
Act. Should the City Council allow the filing of a GPA application, an environmental
analysis will be prepared for the proposed project.
130
PUBLIC COMMENT
Prior to the publication of the Agenda Report, staff received 12 comment letters
regarding the application (Attachment E). The comments generally included two letters
in support of the application and 10 letters in objection of the application. Should
additional comments be submitted following the publication of this report, a subsequent
Supplemental Memorandum will be provided to the Community and Economic
Development Committee.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the Community and Economic Development Committee
recommend that the City Council authorize the filing of a General Plan Amendment
application for this project, subject to a Development Agreement and that all other
necessary entitlement applications be submitted concurrently.
ATTACHMENT A: June 24, 2020 Community and Economic Development Committee
Agenda Report (with attachments)
ATTACHMENT B: Revised Project Plans, dated August 31, 2020
ATTACHMENT C: Project Summary Sheet, submitted August 13, 2020
ATTACHMENT D: Qualitative Design Input Findings & Site Plan Modifications
Implemented, submitted August 13, 2020
ATTACHMENT E: Public Comments, as of September 11, 2020
131
COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT STANDING COMMITTEE
AGENDA REPORT
TO: Community and Economic Development Standing Committee
(Councilmember Mikos and Councilmember Pollock)
FROM: Karen Vaughn, Community Development Director
By: Freddy A. Carrillo, Associate Planner ll
DATE: 06/24/2020 Special Meeting
SUBJECT: Consider General Plan Amendment Pre-Screening Application No.
2019-02 to Allow a General Plan Amendment Application to be Filed
to Change the Land Use Designation from Low Density Residential
(L)and High Density Residential (H) to Very High Density Residential
(VH) for the Development of a 102-Unit Residential Condominium
Project located on 7.4 Acres of Property at the Southeast Corner of
Los Angeles Avenue and Beltramo Ranch Road, on the Application
of Jay Deckard (for Warmington Group)
REQUEST
On November 21, 2019, Jay Deckard for Warmington Group filed a General Plan
Amendment Pre-Screening application to change the land use designation of 7.4 acres
of land at the southeast corner of Los Angeles Avenue and Beltramo Ranch Road from
Low Density Residential (L) and High Density Residential (H) to Very High Density
Residential (VH) for the development of a 102-unit residential condominium project and
associated site improvements, collectively referred to as “Beltramo Ranch”.
Resolution No. 2015-3466 establishes the review procedures for General Plan
Amendment Pre-Screening applications. Review and recommendation by the
Community and Economic Development Committee (CEDC) is required prior to a City
Council public hearing to determine whether or not a General Plan Amendment
application may be accepted for processing. Pre-Screening applications are reviewed
annually in two cycles, depending on the date of application submittal. This application
was submitted under the Cycle 1 timeframe, which required the CEDC to review and
make a recommendation no later than the March regular meeting.
Item: 4.A.
ATTACHMENT A
132
Due to the coronavirus pandemic and local health emergency, the regular CEDC
meeting scheduled for March 18, 2020 was cancelled and staff was unable to meet the
Cycle 1 timeframe. However, on May 13, 2020, the City Council allowed the General
Plan Pre-Screening requested by Warmington Homes to move forward to the CEDC
and City Council off-schedule from the cycle timelines described in Resolution No.
2015-3466.
DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
Project Setting:
The overall project site consists of six lots that are owned by three property owners.
These lots are described below:
•Assessor Parcel Number: 504-0-021-195
Address: Vacant (Beltramo Ranch Road)
The 2.59-acre lot is currently vacant.
•Assessor Parcel Numbers: 506-0-030-220, 506-0-030-210, 506-0-030-235, and
506-0-030-045
Address: 11930-11934 Los Angeles Avenue (International Church of The Four
Square Gospel)
The 3.51-acre site is currently developed with a 1,600 square-foot building
(church), 2,600 square-foot office trailer, and 700 square-foot classroom trailer.
Access to the community church is provided from Los Angeles Avenue.
•Assessor Parcel Number: 506-0-030-055
Address: 11944 Los Angeles Avenue
The 1.32-acre lot is currently developed with a 1,541 square-foot single-family
home. Ingress/egress to the home is secured by an easement over Beltramo
Ranch Road.
These lots would be merged to create a 7.4-acre site for the project development
(described under the Proposed Development). Adjacent development and land uses
include single-family residential neighborhoods to the east and west; industrial
development to the north and a community park adjacent to a vacant lot to the south of
the site.
100-Year Flood Zone and Liquefaction Zone:
A portion of the project site is located within the 100-Year Flood Zone. In 2011, the City
successfully appealed to the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) to
revise the Digital Flood Insurance Rate Maps (DFIRM) by removing over 850 residential
and commercial properties from the 100-year flood zone. However, approximately 161
parcels, including APN: 504-0-021-195 (Beltramo Ranch Road), remain in the 100-year
133
flood zone. There are limitations regarding what can be constructed within areas of the
site that are designated as a regulatory floodway; however, the proposed use of the
property near the Arroyo Simi as a park does not conflict with the FEMA designations
over that portion of the property. Attachment D depicts the Special Flood Hazard Area
that is located in the southern portion of the project site and adjacent to Glenwood Park.
The project site is also located within a liquefaction zone, as is a good portion of the
city. Development is not precluded within liquefaction zones. A Geotech Report and
Soils Report would determine what construction methods and materials would be
required for a development to occur.
Previous Applications:
On September 8, 1987, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 87-152,
approving Conditional Use Permit No. 4508 for the construction of church facilities,
including a sanctuary and classrooms, on the southeast corner of Los Angeles Avenue
and Beltramo Ranch Road. The Council appealed the decision regarding the use of a
septic system in conjunction with the proposed church and day care center, and on
November 4, 1987, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 87-424, approving
Conditional Use Permit No. 4508 amending a condition of approval on the review of the
permit.
On May 26, 2005, the City received a Pre-Application for a conceptual residential
development of approximately 30 units on Beltramo Ranch Road. The application was
reviewed by the City’s Development Review Committee (DRC) and comments were
provided to the applicant on July 15, 2005. The applicant decided not to move forward
with the General Plan Amendment Pre-Screening application for the proposed project.
On April 19, 2019, the City received a Pre-Application for a conceptual residential
development of 112-unit multi-family workforce rental project located at 11930 and
11944 Los Angeles Avenue and Beltramo Ranch Road. The application was reviewed
by the DRC and comments were provided to the applicant on August 8, 2019. The
applicant decided not to move forward with the General Plan Amendment Pre-
Screening application for the proposed project.
A General Plan Amendment and Zone Change have not been previously proposed on
the proposed project site.
Proposed Development:
The proposed Project would include 102 residential condominiums, a 20,000+/- square-
foot neighborhood park and associated site improvements. The units would be provided
within 30 two-story buildings at a maximum of 30 feet high. Each unit would include a
two-car garage and the site would include 51 guest parking spaces dispersed
throughout. A detailed Project Summary is included in Attachment F. As designed, the
134
proposed residential and guest parking would comply with the off-street parking
requirements of the City Code. Two access points are provided by Los Angeles Avenue
and a pedestrian gate is proposed at the southeast corner of the site, connecting
through to Loretta Drive. The proposed park would be located on the south side of the
Project, adjacent to the existing Glenwood Park. The proposed Project would provide an
internal walkway system and private sidewalk linkages to surrounding local streets and
Glenwood Park.
The conceptual site plan was reviewed by the DRC on January 8, 2020. Comments
were provided by various agencies, including Ventura County Fire Protection Agency,
Parks, Landscaping, Community Services, and Waste Management. Concerns
regarding site accessibility in accordance with Ventura County Fire Protection District
access standards; landscape buffer; and waste/recycling collection services were
among the comments provided. Key comments have been addressed in the updated
plans.
While the conceptual plans provide context to evaluate the requested General Plan
Amendment, these plans will be refined if the project is allowed to proceed. The Pre-
Screening process provides an opportunity for the City Council to evaluate the
conceptual request, provide initial feedback to the Applicant, and determine whether or
not a General Plan Amendment application may be accepted for processing.
Existing and Proposed General Plan Land Use Designation:
The existing and proposed General Plan designations of the parcels are outlined on
Attachment A. The existing General Plan land use designation for parcel numbers
11930-11934 Los Angeles Avenue and 11944 Los Angeles Avenue is Low Density
Residential (L) and High Density Residential (H) for Beltramo Ranch Road. The Low
Density Residential designation allows for a maximum density of one unit per acre and
is characterized by single-family homes. The High Density Residential designation
allows for a maximum of seven units per acre and is intended for a wide range of
residential development types including attached and detached single-family units and
multiple-family attached units. Areas with this designation should exhibit adequate and
convenient access to local collector streets and be conveniently serviced by
neighborhood commercial and recreational facilities.
The Applicant is requesting to submit an application for a General Plan Amendment
(GPA) to change the land use designation of the properties to Very High Density
Residential (VH), which allows for a maximum density of 15 units per acre. The Very
High Density land use designation is intended for a wide range of residential
development characterized by multiple-family attached units, including apartment and
condominium buildings. It is intended that this category utilize innovative site planning,
provide onsite recreational amenities and be located in close proximity to major
community facilities, business centers and major arterials.
135
The conceptual Project proposes a gross density of 13.8 units per acre, with 15 units
(15%) deed restricted for low (51-80% of the area median income (AMI) and moderate
(81-120% AMI) income households. The Project’s ultimate affordable housing
requirements would be negotiated in the Development Agreement, if the GPA is
authorized.
Existing General Plan Land Use and Zoning Designations- Permitted Density:
The maximum density allowed in the Low Density Residential General Plan land use
designation is one dwelling unit per acre, and seven dwelling units per acre in the High
Density Residential General Plan land use designation. A total of 23 units could be
permitted based upon the density of the existing General Plan land use designations of
the subject property. The existing zoning designation for the site is Rural Exclusive (RE-
20) and Single-Family Residential (R-1). The Rural Exclusive zone allows a maximum
density of four units per gross acre, and seven units per gross acre in the Single-Family
Residential zone. A total of 38 units could be permitted on the property based upon the
current zoning designations; however, the density permitted by the General Plan
designations take precedent over the zoning, as the zoning is required to implement the
General Plan and be consistent with the General Plan designations.
The following table summarizes the permitted number of units allowed in the existing
General Plan land use and zoning designation of the project site.
Numbers of Units Permitted By
Existing General Plan Land
Designation
Number of Units Permitted By Existing
Zoning Designation
23 Units 38 Units
The following table summarizes the General Plan, zoning, and existing land uses on the
subject properties and within the vicinity of the project site.
Location Existing General
Plan Designation
Proposed
General Plan
Designation
Existing
Zoning
Designation
Existing
Land Use
Site
Low Density
Residential
(1DU/AC) and
High Density
Residential
(7DU/AC)
Very High
Density
Residential
(15DU/AC)
Rural
Exclusive
(RE-20) and
Single-Family
Residential
(R-1)
Community
church, single-
family home,
and vacant road
North Medium Industrial
(l-2)
Limited
Industrial
(M-1)
Industrial
Buildings
136
South
Low Density
Residential
(1DU/AC) and
Park (P)
Rural
Exclusive
(RE-20) and
Open Space
(O-S)
Single-family
homes
and community
park
East
Low Density
Residential
(1DU/AC)
Rural
Exclusive
(RE-20)
Single-family
homes
West
High Density
Residential
(7DU/AC)
Residential
Planned
Development
(RPD-8.4U)
Single-family
homes
General Plan Goal and Policy Analysis
The design of the Project is conceptual at this time; however, the following Goals and
Policies from the City’s General Plan are relevant to the project:
Land Use Element Goals and Policies:
•GOAL 1: Attain a balanced City growth pattern which includes a full mix of land
uses.
Policy 1.3: New residential development shall be consistent with City-adopted
growth ordinance policies.
•GOAL 3: Provide a variety of housing types and opportunities for all economic
segments of the community.
Policy 3.1: A mix of residential densities shall be provided which accommodates
the housing needs of all members of the community.
Policy 3.3: Where feasible, inclusionary zoning shall be used to require that a
percentage of new, private residential development be affordable to very low to
moderate income households.
•GOAL 5: Develop new residential housing which is compatible with the character
of existing individual neighborhoods and minimizes land use incompatibility.
Policy 5.2: Infill development in existing residential neighborhood shall be
compatible with the scale and character of the surrounding neighborhood.
137
Housing Element Goals and Policies:
•GOAL 2: Provide residential sites through land use, zoning and specific plan
designations to provide a range of housing opportunities.
Policy 2.2: Ensure residential sites have appropriate public services, facilities,
circulation, and other needed infrastructure to support development.
•GOAL 3: Expand and protect housing opportunities for lower income households
and special needs groups.
Policy 3.4: Require, in aggregate, 10% of new units to be affordable to lower-
income households. Establishing priority for usage of in-lieu fee is as follows: 1st
priority – production of affordable housing; 2nd priority – subsidy of affordable
housing; 3rd priority – housing rehabilitation; 4th priority – housing assistance;
and 5th priority – staffing costs.
•GOAL 4: Where appropriate, mitigate unnecessary governmental constraints to
the maintenance, improvement and development of housing.
Policy 4.3: Provide for streamlined, timely, and coordinated processing of
residential projects to minimize holding costs and encourage housing production.
Policy 4.4: Support infill development at suitable locations and provide, where
appropriate, incentives to facilitate such development.
In addition, to the Project’s ability to implement the various Goals and Policies of the
General Plan, the proposed General Plan Amendment could also facilitate additional
housing units required by the State Housing and Community Development Department
(HCD). A summary of the City’s current (5th Cycle, 2014-2021) Regional Housing
Needs Assessment (RHNA) obligation, remaining housing units, and the impacts of the
proposed development are outlined in the following table:
Housing Type RHNA Required
for 2014-2021
Moorpark
Cumulative Totals
5th cycle to date
Housing still
needed/required
by 2021
Beltramo Ranch
Preliminary
Proposal
Very Low Income 289 Units 15 Units 274 Units 0 Units
Low Income 197 Units 39 Units 158 Units 8 Proposed Units
Moderate 216 Units 11 Unit 205 Units 7 Proposed Units
Above Moderate 462 Units 518 Units 0 (Surplus of 56
Unit)
87 Proposed Units
Totals: 1,164 Units
Required
583 Total Unit
Permitted in
Moorpark 2014-
2019
637 Additional
Units Required
by 2021
102 Proposed
Units
138
Planning for the upcoming 6th RHNA Cycle (2021-2029) is well underway and the
RHNA allocation is subject to an appeal process before the numbers are finalized.
Preliminary 6th Cycle RHNA projections for Moorpark include 1,288 units, in addition to
the units allocated with the 5th Cycle.
PROCESSING TIME LIMITS FOR A GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT PRE-
SCREENING APPLICATION (CYCLE 1)
The General Plan Amendment Pre-Screening Application Review Procedures requires
the CEDC to make a recommendation to the City Council no later than the following
March regular meeting. A public hearing held by the City Council will need to occur no
later than the second regular meeting in May to determine whether or not a General
Plan Amendment application may be filed. However, due to the coronavirus pandemic
and local health emergency, the CEDC meeting scheduled for March 18, 2020 was
cancelled and the application was unable to meet the Cycle 1 timeframe. On May 13,
2020, the City Council allowed the General Plan Pre-Screening requested by the
applicant to move forward to the CEDC and City Council off-schedule from the normal
cycle timelines.
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
A GPA Pre-Screening application does not involve any approval action and is therefore
not subject to environmental review. Should the City Council allow the filing of a GPA
application, an environmental analysis will be prepared for the proposed project.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the Community and Economic Development Committee
recommend that the City Council authorize the filing of a General Plan Amendment
application for this project, subject to a Development Agreement and that all other
necessary entitlement applications be submitted concurrently.
ATTACHMENT A: Existing and Proposed General Plan Designation
ATTACHMENT B: Location Map
ATTACHMENT C: Aerial Map
ATTACHMENT D: Federal Emergency Management Agency Flood Zone Map
ATTACHMENT E: Project Plans
ATTACHMENT F: Warmington Group Project Narrative
139
ATTACHMENT A
EXISTING AND PROPOSED GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION
Existing Low
Density
Residential (L)
proposed to Very
High Density
Residential (VH)
Existing High Density
Residential (H)
Existing Low Density
Residential (L)
Existing High Density
Residential (H)
proposed to Very
High Density
Residential (VH)
Los Angeles Avenue
140
Location Map - Southeast Corner of Los Angeles Avenue and Beltramo Road
ATTACHMENT B
E Los Angeles Ave E Los Angeles Ave
@)
itrcrttk Rd
... ..
3
.% ..
"' a.
-;
it Court-Ln =I ._,
.. 1
1 ~ .. .. a. .. .. > < ::0 • a.
+
HarvtSltrSt
1"=37 6ft
Glenwood
Park
GPA Pre-Sc reening
.<: g ..
~'--~
~
~
• W Los Angeles Ave
3: ..
!i ----:----1
~
!;"
Loretta 'Dr
• 03/12/2020 ·-$:
> ft
Thisma11i\l':rrmesentm vi suald isplf.)Of re !ated;jeog raphirinformationData providedhe<eon is not guaranteoof acutuaJieldconditionsT obe sureof completmccuracypleasecontacllhe
respons1 a ormostup t oda te1n ormanon. 141
Aerial Map - Southeast Corner of Los Angeles Avenue and Beltramo Road
ATTACHMENT C
1"=376ft GPA Pre-Screening
Thisma11mayre!llesentm vi suald ispli!)Of re!ated;jeographi<informationData provide<fle<eon is not gua ra nteoof acutuaJieldconditionsT obe sureof completmccuracypleasecontacllhe
respons1blstamorm ostup toda te1ntormat1on. 142
ATTACHMENT D
Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Special Flood
Hazard Area
Los Angeles Avenue
Site
143
W LOS ANGELES AVETIERRA REJADA RDGLENWOOD PARKSITEPROJECTMAUREEN LANELORETTA DRIVEELDERBERRY AVENUEArchitecture + Planning17911 Von Karman Ave,Suite 200Irvine, CA 92614949.851.2133ktgy.comPlot Date:BELTRAMO RANCHMOORPARK, CA # 2018-0860BELTRAMO RANCHM O O R P A R K , C A L I F O R N I ADEVELOPER:WARMINGTON RESIDENTIAL3090 PULLMAN STREETCOSTA MESA, CA 92626714.434.4439ARCHITECT:KTGY ARCHITECTURE + PLANNING17911 VON KARMAN AVENUE, STE 200IRVINE, CA 92614949.851.2133PREPARED FOR: COMMUNITY & ECONOMICDEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE(CEDC)PROJECT TEAMVICINITY MAP NTSARCHITECTURALA0.0 SHEET INDEXA1.0 CONCEPTUAL SITE PLANA1.1 CIRCULATION EXHIBITA1.2 TRASH COLLECTION EXHIBITA1.3 CONCEPTUAL PARK AMENITIESA2.0 IMAGE BOARDA3.0 CONCEPTUAL ELEVATIONA4.0 SAMPLE FLOOR PLAN 1A4.1 SAMPLE FLOOR PLAN 2A4.2 SAMPLE FLOOR PLAN 3A4.3 SAMPLE FLOOR PLAN FEBRUARY 26, 2020Warmington Residential3090 Pullman StreetCosta Mesa, CA 92626AB3"55"$).&/5&144
A1.0- "Very High Density:"*Conceptual Site Plan is compliant with R-2 zoning, standards,however project is seeking RPD zoning and Very High Density Residential.145
A1.1123456781112131415161718192021232224252728910302926146
A1.2123456781112131415161718192021232224252728910302926147
A1.3FEBRUARY 26, 2020148
Architecture + Planning17911 Von Karman Ave,Suite 200Irvine, CA 92614949.851.2133ktgy.comPlot Date:Warmington Residential3090 Pullman StreetCosta Mesa, CA 92626BELTRAMO RANCHMOORPARK, CA # 2018-0860SCALE: NTSA2.0FEBRUARY 26, 2020149
Architecture + Planning17911 Von Karman Ave,Suite 200Irvine, CA 92614949.851.2133ktgy.comPlot Date:Warmington Residential3090 Pullman StreetCosta Mesa, CA 92626BELTRAMO RANCHMOORPARK, CA # 2018-0860SCALE: NTS9'-1"9'-1"±30'-0"9'-1"9'-1"±30'-0"A3.0FEBRUARY 26, 2020150
M. BEDROOMD11'-9" x 13'-0"W.I.C.M. BATHMBATHMMMMBED 210'-0" x 11'-0"BATH 2BATH 2AAAAAABED 310'-0" x 11'-0"LAUNDRYLAUNDRYLLLLRRRR8'-6"86 x x6'-8"6847'-2"13'-5"7'-7"21'-0"17RDNTECHHLINENNLOFT8'-10" x 8'-6"1'-0"1'-2"49'-4"DBLSHELVESVKITCHENKITCHENHHHHHHCCTCGREAT ROOMGREAT ROOMOOOOOOAAAA20'-4"20' 4" x 12'-10"12' 10"2-CAR GARAGE20'-4" x 20'-2"TANKLESSSSSSSSSTW.H.W47'-4"21'-0"A/CT20'-4"17RRRR7UPPPPPPOWDERWDERDDDWOOOOWPOOOOOOOWWOOWOOOENTRYENTRYNNTTNN1'-0"49'-4"1'-0"PRIVATEPATIO(PER LANDSCAPE)()150SF MIN.10'-2"10'-10"21'-0"SAMPLE FLOOR PLAN 0A4.FEBRUARY 26, 202001 +\- 1400SF151
KITCHENKITCHENKITCHENTHHKKLIVING ROOMLIVING ROOMIIMMMVMRRRR12'-0"12' 0"0000 x x14'-4"14' 4"44POWDERPOWDERRDDDDDDDDWWWWRDEDDDWDOPERRERRE2-CAR GARAGEG23'-6"36 x 20'-0"UTILITY CLOSETEWHERE OCCURSRPER SITECOATSDININGDININGDININGNNGG12'-0"12 0-00 x x12'-8"12 810'-10"1'-0"25'-10"20'-4"27'-8"6"23'-6"20'-0"12'-8"11'-8"1'-0"25'-4"17R17RUPUPPANTRY6"6"1'-2"1'-2"51'-2"13'-6"20'-10 1/2"A/C1'-0"PRIVATEPATIO(PER LANDSCAPE)()150SF MIN.MASTER BED11'-10" x 14'-4"W.I.C.MASTER BATHMASTER BATHAAHHAHAHMMAAAAMMAABED 210'-6" x 11'-2"LAUNDRYLAUNDRYUUUURRRRYY8'-4"8-4 x x6'-6"6-6666BED 310'-4" x 10'-4"BATH 2BATH 2BBBB2222LOFT / OPT. BED 413'-6" x 10'-10"10'-10"25'-10"1'-0"12'-8"17RDNLINENTECH1'-6"25'-10"11'-8"6"1'-0"14'-5"13'-3"21'-4"1'-2"51'-2"13'-6"KITCHENKITCHENKITCHENHHKKKKKLIVING ROOMLIVING ROOMIIMMMVMRRRR12'-0"12' 0"0000 x x14'-4"14' 4"44POWDERPOWDERPPPPRRRRRRWWW2-CAR GARAGEG23'-6"36 x 20'-0"COATSDININGDININGDININGNNGG12'-0"12 0-0000 x x12'-8"12 810'-10"1'-0"25'-10"20'-4"27'-8"6"A/C23'-6"20'-0"12'-8"12'-2"6"25'-4"17R17RUPUPPANTRY6"6"1'-0"1'-2"51'-2"13'-6"UTILITY CLOSETWHERE OCCURSRPER SITE20'-10 1/2"PRIVATEPATIO(PER LANDSCAPE)()150SF MIN.SAMPLE FLOOR PLAN0A4.FEBRUARY 26, 202012 +\- 1750SF152
0SAMPLE FLOOR PLAN A4.FEBRUARY 26, 20203A +\- 1600SF2153
0SAMPLE FLOOR PLAN A4.FEBRUARY 26, 20203B +\- 1600SF3154
1
BELTRAMO
RANCH
-‐
MOORPARK
PROJECT
SUMMARY
SHEET
The
proposed
“BELTRAMO
RANCH”
project
provides
for
a
new
Moorpark
residential
community
to
be
developed
on
a
7.4-‐acre
site.
Project
development
requires
the
relocation
and/or
demolition
of
existing
buildings
and
site
grading/improvements
to
prepare
the
site
for
land
development.
The
Beltramo
Ranch
project
is
comprised
of
the
following
two
development
components:
Beltramo
Ranch
Residential
Component.
The
project
includes
a
non-‐gated
residential
neighborhood,
consisting
of
102
for-‐sale
townhouse
units
(see
Conceptual
Site
Plan
dated
2.26.2020).
RESIDENTIAL
PROJECT
PLAN
SUMMARY
Unit
Plan
Type
Square
Footage
Total
Units
Plan
1:
3-‐Bdrm/2.5
Bath
+/-‐
1,400
SF
27
Plan
2:
4-‐Bdrm/2.5
Bath
+/-‐
1,750
SF
36
Plan
3:
3-‐Bdrm/2.5
Bath
+/-‐
1,600
SF
39
Total
102
Units
Note:
Plan
1
Units
are
Front-‐Loaded
Townhomes,
Plans
2/3
are
Rear-‐Loaded
Townhomes
The
project
will
be
on
one
lot,
through
a
Vesting
Tentative
Tract
Map
for
condominium
purposes.
The
Development
Plan
provides
for
fifteen
affordable
units
(15%
of
the
total
project
units)
to
be
sold
to
qualifying,
low
and
moderate-‐income
residents.
The
plan
proposes
a
mix
of
eight
low-‐income
units
and
seven
moderate-‐income
units.
The
proposed
architectural
style
for
the
townhomes
incorporates
a
traditional
Spanish-‐
style
(see
Image
Board).
Spanish
architectural
features
have
been
implemented
into
the
overall
plan
to
provide
attractive,
authentic
details,
including
the
following:
¥White
Stucco
with
Red
"S"
Tile
Roof
¥Wood
and
Metal
Decor
¥Faux
Chimneys
¥Recessed
Doors
&
Windows
These
three
and
four
bedroom
homes
feature
efficiently
designed
living
spaces
with
kitchens
on
the
first
level
and
bedrooms
on
the
second
level.
Each
home
includes
two
and
one-‐half
bathrooms.
The
builder
will
employ
green
building
techniques
to
provide
for
energy
efficient
homes,
well-‐balanced
and
integrated
site
lighting,
and
drought-‐
tolerant
native
landscaping.
Beltramo
Ranch
Amenities/Open
Space
Component.
The
project
offers
over
70,000
square
feet
of
combined
open
"green
space"
located
throughout
the
project
site.
This
open
space
concept
provides
for
passive
gathering
spaces
for
use
by
Beltramo
Ranch
ATTACHMENT F
155
2
residents
and
guests.
The
project
also
provides
an
internal
walkway
system
and
private
sidewalk
linkages
to
surrounding
local
streets
and
Glenwood
Park,
a
local
neighborhood
City
park.
A
dog
park,
park
area,
and
barbeque/picnic
areas
are
proposed
at
the
southern
end
of
the
site,
adjacent
to
Glenwood
Park.
Applicant:
Warmington
Residential
3090
Pullman
Street
Costa
Mesa,
California
92626
Project
Setting:
The
project
is
located
on
generally
the
west
end
of
the
City
of
Moorpark
at
the
southeast
corner
of
West
Los
Angeles
Avenue
and
Beltramo
Ranch
Road.
The
site
consists
of
six
parcels,
identified
as
assessor’s
parcel
numbers
504-‐0-‐021-‐195,
506-‐0-‐
030-‐220,
506-‐0-‐030-‐210,
506-‐0-‐030-‐235,
506-‐0-‐030-‐235,
and
506-‐0-‐030-‐055.
The
combined
acreage
for
the
all
project
parcels
is
7.4
acres.
Existing/
Proposed
Zoning:
Residential
(R-‐1,
R-‐20)/
Residential
Planned
Development
(RPD)
Existing/Proposed
General
Plan
Designation:
Residential
(Combination
of
Low
Density
and
High
Density)/Very
High
Density
Existing
Uses:
Community
Church
Facilities;
Single-‐Family
Home,
Beltramo
Ranch
Road
Site
Access:
State
Route
118
is
the
primary
east-‐west
access
route
serving
the
City
of
Moorpark
and
the
subject
site.
In
Moorpark,
the
118
connects
at
the
intersection
of
State
Route
23
in
eastern
Moorpark.
State
Route
23
is
the
primary
north-‐south
access
route
to
Moorpark.
The
118
is
also
known
as
West
Los
Angeles
Avenue
and
is
contiguous
to
the
project's
northern
site
boundary.
Local
street
access
to
the
project
site
will
be
provided
via
a
new
private
loop
street.
The
new
in-‐tract
street
will
be
designated
a
local
roadway
and
will
provide
direct
entry
to
the
project
with
ingress
and
egress
at
the
primary
driveway
and
egress
at
the
secondary
driveway.
A
pedestrian
gate
is
proposed
at
the
southeast
corner
of
the
site,
connecting
through
Loretta
Drive.
Building
Coverage:
Proposed
building
coverage
is
35%,
which
is
well
under
the
50%
maximum
allowable
standard.
Setbacks:
Setbacks
comply
with
the
City's
R-‐2
zone
development
standards.
156
3
Parking:
Each
unit
will
provide
two
garage
parking
spaces
and
guest
surface
parking
spaces
for
a
total
of
2.5
spaces
per
unit.
There
are
a
total
of
204
garage
spaces
and
51
surface
(guest)
parking
spaces.
Guest
parking
spaces
are
9'
x
20'.
Project
Approval
Requests:
Development
of
the
Beltramo
Ranch
project
will
require
the
following
City
approvals:
¥General
Plan
Amendment
&
Zone
Change
¥Vesting
Tentative
Tract
Map
¥Development
Agreement
As
mandated
by
State
law,
the
project
is
subject
to
the
California
Environmental
Quality
Act
(CEQA)
statute.
The
CEQA
environmental
review
imposes
both
procedural
and
substantive
requirements,
with
the
City
of
Moorpark
designated
as
the
lead
agency.
Other
discretionary
agency
permits
(such
as
RWQCB,
CDFW,
ACOE)
may
be
required,
as
determined
through
the
project
approval
process.
157
W LOS ANGELES AVETIERRA REJADA RDGLENWOOD PARKSITEPROJECTMAUREEN LANELORETTA DRIVEELDERBERRY AVENUEArchitecture + Planning17911 Von Karman Ave,Suite 200Irvine, CA 92614949.851.2133ktgy.com#MOORPARK - BELTRAMO RANCHMOORPARK, CA 2018-0860Warmington Residential3090 Pullman StreetCosta Mesa, CA 92626BELTRAMO RANCHM O O R P A R K , C A L I F O R N I ADEVELOPER:WARMINGTON RESIDENTIAL3090 PULLMAN STREETCOSTA MESA, CA 92626714.434.4439ARCHITECT:KTGY ARCHITECTURE + PLANNING17911 VON KARMAN AVENUE, STE 200IRVINE, CA 92614949.851.2133PREPARED FOR: COMMUNITY & ECONOMICDEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE(CEDC #2; SEPT. 16, 2020)PROJECT TEAMVICINITY MAP NTSARCHITECTURALA0.0 SHEET INDEXA1.0 CONCEPTUAL SITE PLANA1.1 CIRCULATION EXHIBITA2.0 IMAGE BOARDA3.0 CONCEPTUAL ELEVATIONA4.0 SAMPLE FLOOR PLAN 1A4.1 SAMPLE FLOOR PLAN 2A4.2 SAMPLE FLOOR PLAN 3A4.3 SAMPLE FLOOR PLAN DUPLEXA5.0 SITE SECTIONSA5.1 SITE SECTIONSCIVIL:STANTEC111 EAST VICTORIA STREETSANTA BARBARA, CA 93101805.308.9159SHEET INDEXAUGUST 25, 2020$77$&+0(17%SEPTEMBER 03, 2020158
RIGHT TURN LANEPedestrian Gate Access to Glenwood Park8' Sound Wall11.0'25.0'15.0'RIGHT TURN LANE10.0'Park Area (±45,000sf)Green Space to be ProgrammedW. LOS ANGELES AVE.MEDIANBREAK6.2'25.0'20.0'58.2'48.2'49.8'41.8'61.1'61.0'60.6'42.9'15.0'10.0'20.0'LORETTA DRIVEPrivate Vehicular Gate6'-8' Wall6'-8' WallGuest ParkingDriveway Typ.LEFT TURN LANE4.0'25.0'25.0'712.0'14.0'45.0'57.8'41.1'11 12131415161718192021224140232526272410.0'24.0'25.0'10.0'5.0'65151743872110 912 1114 1332333435222324FUTURE PEDESTRIANGATE ACCESS TOARROYO SIMIFUTURE POTENTIAL PARKING FORPUBLIC ACCESS TO GLENWOODPARK AND ARROYO SIMIFUTURE PUBLIC ACCESSTHROUGH PROJECT GREENSPACE TO ARROYO SIMIFUTURE PEDESTRIAN AND EQUESTRIAN GATEACCESS TO ARROYO SIMI AND LORETTA DRIVEArchitecture + Planning17911 Von Karman Ave,Suite 200Irvine, CA 92614949.851.2133ktgy.com#MOORPARK - BELTRAMO RANCHMOORPARK, CA 2018-0860Warmington Residential3090 Pullman StreetCosta Mesa, CA 92626Site Plan SummarySite Area: ±7.4 ac. (±323,000sf)Home Mix: 17 homes - Plan 1 (1845sf - 3bd/2.5ba) 20 homes - Plan 2 (1970sf - 3bd+Loft/2.5ba) 10 homes - Plan 3 (2045sf - 4bd+Loft/3ba) 47 homes - Total SFD 22 Duplex homes (1900-2000sf - 3bd+Opt Bed4/2.5ba)Total Units: 69 homesSite Density: ±9.3 du/acCONCEPTUAL SITE PLANSEPTEMBER 03, 202005010025Parcel Addresses & APNsExisting ZoningBeltramo Ranch Road RE-1APN: 504-0-021-19511930-11934 West Los Angeles Ave. RE-20APN: 506-0-030-220APN: 506-0-030-210APN: 506-0-030-235APN: 506-0-030-04511944 West Los Angeles Ave. ROAPN: 506-0-030-255Proposed Zoning: RPD*Parking Provided: 138 spaces - Garage Spaces 47 spaces - Driveway 35 spaces - Guest On-Site 220 spaces - Total (±3.2 sp/unit)Building Coverage: 30%Proposed Building Height: SFD ±26'; Duplexes ±29' (2nd Floor Window Height ±18'-6")Open Space Provided: ±48,000sf - Private Yards ±45,000sf - Park Area ±93,000sf - Total Open Space Provided (30% of site)R-2* Developmental Standards:Density - "Very High Density": 15 du/acFront Yard Setback: 20'Interior Side Yard Setback: 5'Street Side Yard Setback: 10'Rear Yard Setback: 15'Lot Coverage: 50%Building Height: 35'Resident Parking: 2.5 sp/unit*Conceptual Site Plan is compliant with R-2 zoning, standards,however project is seeking RPD zoning and Very High Density ResidentialLEGENDPUBLIC GATE ACCESSFLOOD PLAIN LIMIT LINEPEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION159
/HJHQG9HKLFXODU&LUFXODWLRQ 3HGHVWULDQ&LUFXODWLRQ 2SHQ6SDFH160
Architecture + Planning17911 Von Karman Ave,Suite 200Irvine, CA 92614949.851.2133ktgy.comPlot Date:08.10.2020Warmington Residential3090 Pullman StreetCosta Mesa, CA 92626BELTRAMO RANCHMOORPARK, CA # 2018-0860SCALE: NTSArchitecture + Planning17911 Von Karman Ave,Suite 200Irvine, CA 92614949.851.2133ktgy.com#MOORPARK - BELTRAMO RANCHMOORPARK, CA 2018-0860Warmington Residential3090 Pullman StreetCosta Mesa, CA 92626CIRCULATION EXHIBITAUGUST 10, 2020Architecture + Planning17911 Von Karman Ave,Suite 200Irvine, CA 92614949.851.2133ktgy.com#MOORPARK - BELTRAMO RANCHMOORPARK, CA 2018-0860Warmington Residential3090 Pullman StreetCosta Mesa, CA 92626CIRCULATION EXHIBITAUGUST 10, 2020Architecture + Planning17911 Von Karman Ave,Suite 200Irvine, CA 92614949.851.2133ktgy.com#MOORPARK - BELTRAMO RANCHMOORPARK, CA 2018-0860Warmington Residential3090 Pullman StreetCosta Mesa, CA 92626CIRCULATION EXHIBITAUGUST 10, 2020Architecture + Planning17911 Von Karman Ave,Suite 200Irvine, CA 92614949.851.2133ktgy.com#MOORPARK - BELTRAMO RANCHMOORPARK, CA 2018-0860Warmington Residential3090 Pullman StreetCosta Mesa, CA 92626CIRCULATION EXHIBITAUGUST 10, 2020IMAGE BOARDSEPTEMBER 03, 2020161
Architecture + Planning17911 Von Karman Ave,Suite 200Irvine, CA 92614949.851.2133ktgy.com#MOORPARK - BELTRAMO RANCHMOORPARK, CA 2018-0860Warmington Residential3090 Pullman StreetCosta Mesa, CA 92626PROPOSED EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS DETACHED SINGLE FAMILY HOMES PAIRED HOMESArchitecture + Planning17911 Von Karman Ave,Suite 200Irvine, CA 92614949.851.2133ktgy.comPlot Date:08.10.2020Warmington Residential3090 Pullman StreetCosta Mesa, CA 92626BELTRAMO RANCHMOORPARK, CA # 2018-0860SCALE: NTSArchitecture + Planning17911 Von Karman Ave,Suite 200Irvine, CA 92614949.851.2133ktgy.com#MOORPARK - BELTRAMO RANCHMOORPARK, CA 2018-0860Warmington Residential3090 Pullman StreetCosta Mesa, CA 92626CIRCULATION EXHIBITAUGUST 10, 2020Architecture + Planning17911 Von Karman Ave,Suite 200Irvine, CA 92614949.851.2133ktgy.com#MOORPARK - BELTRAMO RANCHMOORPARK, CA 2018-0860Warmington Residential3090 Pullman StreetCosta Mesa, CA 92626CIRCULATION EXHIBITAUGUST 10, 2020Architecture + Planning17911 Von Karman Ave,Suite 200Irvine, CA 92614949.851.2133ktgy.com#MOORPARK - BELTRAMO RANCHMOORPARK, CA 2018-0860Warmington Residential3090 Pullman StreetCosta Mesa, CA 92626CIRCULATION EXHIBITAUGUST 10, 2020Architecture + Planning17911 Von Karman Ave,Suite 200Irvine, CA 92614949.851.2133ktgy.com#MOORPARK - BELTRAMO RANCHMOORPARK, CA 2018-0860Warmington Residential3090 Pullman StreetCosta Mesa, CA 92626CIRCULATION EXHIBITAUGUST 10, 2020IMAGE BOARDSEPTEMBER 03, 2020162
35'-0"39'-9"OPTIONAL OPENTRELLIS / PATIO5'-0"45'-0"50'-0"5'-0"5'-0"5'-0"25'-4"9'-8"10'-0"29'-9"40'-0"25'-0"15'-0"5'-10"9'-2"20'-0"35'-0"16'-6"8'-6"10'-0"DN.17R.35'-0"39'-9"25'-4"9'-8"10'-0"24'-2"38'-6"34'-2"4'-4"35'-0"17'-0"8'-0"10'-0"4'-4"1'-3"Architecture + Planning17911 Von Karman Ave,Suite 200Irvine, CA 92614949.851.2133ktgy.comPlot Date:June 9, 2020FERREE STREETSAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA # 2018-1065Warmington ResidentialSCALE: 1/4"=1'-0"A2.4024 8SAMPLE FLOOR PLAN 0A4.FEBRUARY 26, 202001 +\- 1400SFAUGUST 10, 2020SAMPLE FLOOR PLAN 1 - 1845 SFSEPTEMBER 03, 2020163
40'-0"5'-0"50'-0"50'-0"5'-0"5'-0"5'-0"33'-0"7'-0"22'-3"40'-0"27'-0"13'-0"18'-0"40'-0"12'-2"16'-0"11'-10"5'-0"1'-0"12'-9"40'-0"40'-0"20'-8"24'-3"22'-0"12'-0"40'-0"12'-0"16'-2"11'-10"3'-0"7'-0"12'-4"6'-0"12'-9"Architecture + Planning17911 Von Karman Ave,Suite 200Irvine, CA 92614949.851.2133ktgy.comPlot Date:June 9, 2020FERREE STREETSAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA # 2018-1065Warmington ResidentialSCALE: 1/4"=1'-0"A3.4024 8SAMPLE FLOOR PLAN0A4.FEBRUARY 26, 202012 +\- 1750SFSAMPLE FLOOR PLAN 2 - 1970 SFAUGUST 10, 2020SEPTEMBER 03, 2020164
44'-6"40'-0"5'-0"55'-0"50'-0"5'-0"5'-6"5'-0"30'-2"14'-4"25'-2"40'-0"21'-0"13'-0"18'-0"44'-6"29'-0"5'-2"10'-4"14'-10"6'-0"44'-6"40'-0"19'-10"14'-4"25'-2"40'-0"21'-0"13'-0"44'-6"29'-0"5'-2"10'-4"14'-10"6'-0"10'-4"6"6"Architecture + Planning17911 Von Karman Ave,Suite 200Irvine, CA 92614949.851.2133ktgy.comPlot Date:June 9, 2020FERREE STREETSAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA # 2018-1065Warmington ResidentialSCALE: 1/4"=1'-0"A4.4024 80SAMPLE FLOOR PLAN A4.FEBRUARY 26, 20203A +\- 1600SF2SAMPLE FLOOR PLAN 3 - 2045 SFAUGUST 10, 2020SEPTEMBER 03, 2020165
UpDownPlan 13 BD - 2.5 BA2002 SQ. FT.26'-0"61'-8"KitchenLau.MasterBathW.C.Coat10'-8"36'-10"14'-2"13'-0"13'-0"26'-0"61'-8"10'-8"15'-7"6'-0"13'-0"13'-0"15'-3"14'-3"27'-0"11'-8"11'-4"3'-0"Bath 2Pwd.P.Lin.FoyerPorchDining9'-11" X 14'-8"California Room12'-0" X 10'-0"Master Bedroom15'-0" X 15'-0"Living15'-6" X 14'-8"Bedroom 214'-1" X 11'-5"Bedroom 311'-1" X 13'-1"Garage20'-1" X 20'-1"Architecture + Planning888.456.5849ktgy.comSAN DIEGO COUNTRY CLUBCHULA VISTA, CA # 2018-0014SCHEMATIC DESIGNMARCH 07, 2018A2.0UNIT PLANPlan 1024 80SAMPLE FLOOR PLAN A4.FEBRUARY 26, 20203B +\- 1600SF3SAMPLE FLOOR PLAN DUPLEX +\- 1900-2000 SFAUGUST 10, 2020A4.326'-0"51'-0"26'-0"51'-0"SEPTEMBER 03, 2020166
25'-0"DRIVE AISLE10'-0"PARKING4'-0"WALKPLEXISTING ±6'SCREEN WALL4'-0"PLANTER"HEATHER GLEN"NEIGHBORHOODHOMEPROPOSEDDUPLEX HOME±25'-0"9'-1"9'-1"±25'-3" (29'-0" MAX.)OVERALL BUILDING HEIGHTT.O.PLATEF.F.T.O.PLATEFF=476.70GFF=476.00FG=475.00PROPOSED ±8'SCREEN WALL±18'-10"2ND FLOOR WINDOW HEIGHT±61'-3 1/2"F.F.FINISHED GRADETYP. LANDSCAPESCREENING±20'-0"Architecture + Planning17911 Von Karman Ave,Suite 200Irvine, CA 92614949.851.2133ktgy.com#MOORPARK - BELTRAMO RANCHMOORPARK, CA 2018-0860Warmington Residential3090 Pullman StreetCosta Mesa, CA 92626SECTION AT WESTERN PROPERTY LINE1KEY SITE PLAN - NTS024 8SITE SECTIONSSEPTEMBER 03, 20201167
9'-1"9'-1"±25'-3" (26'-0" MAX.)OVERALL BUILDING HEIGHTT.O.PLATEF.F.T.O.PLATEPROPOSED±8' SCREEN WALL25'-0"DRIVE AISLE51'-9 1/2"10'-0"DRIVEWAYEXISTINGNEIGHBORINGGUEST HOUSE4'-0"PLANTERPROPOSEDSINGLE-FAMILYDETACHED HOMEFL=478.50FS=478.75FL=478.50FG=479.10FS=478.80±12'-5 1/2"±15'-9 1/2"EXISTINGNEIGHBORINGHOME18'-10"2ND FLOOR WINDOW HEIGHTEXISTING FENCINGMAUREENLANE37'-8 1/2"F.F.FINISHED GRADEPLTYP. LANDSCAPESCREENING±20'-0"EXISTING FENCINGArchitecture + Planning17911 Von Karman Ave,Suite 200Irvine, CA 92614949.851.2133ktgy.com#MOORPARK - BELTRAMO RANCHMOORPARK, CA 2018-0860Warmington Residential3090 Pullman StreetCosta Mesa, CA 92626KEY SITE PLAN - NTS024 8SITE SECTIONSSEPTEMBER 03, 202011SECTION AT EASTERN PROPERTY LINE168
BELTRAMO RANCH - MOORPARK
PROJECT SUMMARY SHEET
The proposed “BELTRAMO RANCH” project provides for a new Moorpark residential
community to be developed on a 7.4-acre site. Project development requires the
relocation and/or demolition of existing buildings and site grading/improvements to
prepare the site for land development. The Beltramo Ranch project is comprised of the
following two development components:
Beltramo Ranch Residential Component. The project includes a non-gated residential
neighborhood, consisting of 47 single-family homes and 22 paired homes (see revised
Conceptual Site Plan dated 9.3.2020).
RESIDENTIAL PROJECT PLAN SUMMARY
The proposed architectural style for the townhomes incorporates a traditional Spanish-
style (see Image Board and Elevations). Spanish architectural features have been
implemented into the overall plan to provide attractive, authentic details, including the
following:
¥Natural Shades of Stucco with Red "S" Tile Roof
¥Wood and Metal Decor
¥Faux Chimneys
¥Recessed Doors & Windows
These three and four bedroom homes feature ef]iciently designed living spaces with a
great room, dining room, and kitchens on the ]irst level and bedrooms on the second
level, with attached garages (see sample ]loor plans). Each home includes two and one-
half or three bathrooms. The builder will employ green building techniques to provide
for energy ef]icient homes, well-balanced and integrated site lighting, and drought-
tolerant native landscaping.
Unit Plan Type Square Footage Total Units
SFD Plan 1: 3-Bdrm/2.5 Bath +/- 1,845 SF 17
SFD Plan 2: 3-Bdrm + Loft/2.5 Bath +/- 1,970 SF 20
SFD Plan 3: 4-Bdrm + Loft/3 Bath +/- 2.045 SF 10
Paired Homes: 3 or 4 Bdrm/2.5 Bath +/- 1,900-2,000 SF 22
Total 69
1
ATTACHMENT C
169
Beltramo Ranch Amenities/Open Space Component. The project offers over 95,000
square feet of combined open "green space" located throughout the project site. This
includes private yard spaces for each home, and a large green space of nearly one acre at
the southern end of the site, adjacent to Glenwood Park, a local neighborhood City park.
The public green space will be maintained by the Beltramo Ranch HOA, but available for
public use. The project also provides an internal walkway system and private sidewalk
linkages to surrounding local streets with gate access to Glenwood Park (see Circulation
Exhibit). The green space will be programmed as part of the project entitlement
process and will include gate access through the pan-handle portion of the site, south
toward the Arroyo Simi as well as a public gate at Loretta Drive .
Applicant: Warmington Residential
3090 Pullman Street
Costa Mesa, California 92626
Project Setting: The project is located on generally the west end of the City of
Moorpark at the southeast corner of West Los Angeles Avenue
and Beltramo Ranch Road. The site consists of six parcels,
identi]ied as assessor’s parcel numbers 504-0-021-195, 506-0-
030-220, 506-0-030-210, 506-0-030-235, 506-0-030-235, and
506-0-030-055. The combined acreage for the all project parcels
is 7.4 acres.
Existing/
Proposed Zoning: Residential (R-1, R-20)/ Residential Planned Development (RPD)
Existing/Proposed
General Plan
Designation: Residential (Combination of Low Density and High Density)/Very
High Density
Existing
Uses: Community Church Facilities; Single-Family Home, Beltramo
Ranch Road
Site Access: State Route 118 is the primary east-west access route serving the
City of Moorpark and the subject site. In Moorpark, the 118
connects at the intersection of State Route 23 in eastern
Moorpark. State Route 23 is the primary north-south access
route to Moorpark. The 118 is also known as West Los Angeles
Avenue and is contiguous to the project's northern site boundary.
Local street access to the project site will be provided via a new
private loop street. The new in-tract street will be designated as a
local roadway and will provide direct entry to the project with
ingress and egress at the primary driveway.
2
170
A pedestrian gate is proposed at the southeast corner of the site,
connecting through Loretta Drive. Additionally, we propose a
private vehicular gate, to be maintained by the Beltramo Ranch
HOA to continue to provide access for transportation and caring
for large animals for the Loretta Drive properties.
Building Coverage: Proposed building coverage is 30%, which is well under the 50%
maximum allowable standard.
Setbacks: Setbacks are well in excess of the City's R-2 zone development
standards and dimensions are included on the site plan. Due to
the recon]iguration of the loop road along the western and
eastern property lines, ample setbacks are now provided from
existing surrounding homes.
Parking: Each home will provide two garage parking spaces, resulting in
138 garage spaces and 47 driveway spaces, for a total of 185
spaces. Although not required by code, we have included 35
guest parking spaces throughout the site to provide for additional
parking. Project parking totals 220 spaces, or 3.2 spaces per unit.
Project
Approval
Requests: Development of the Beltramo Ranch project will require the
following City approvals:
¥General Plan Amendment & Zone Change
¥Vesting Tentative Tract Map
As mandated by State law, the project is subject to the California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) statute. The CEQA
environmental review imposes both procedural and substantive
requirements, with the City of Moorpark designated as the lead
agency. Other discretionary agency permits (such as RWQCB,
CDFW, ACOE) may be required, as determined through the
project approval process.
3
171
BELTRAMO RANCH PROJECT, MOORPARK
Qualitative Design Input Findings & Site Plan Modifications
Implemented
Warmington Residen/al Project Applica/on/Site Plan
A number of community mee/ngs were held to provide the adjacent neighborhoods an oppor-
tunity to find out more about the project and to express their comments and concerns. An ini-
/al mee/ng was held last fall, prior to filing the General Plan Amendment Pre-Screening Appli-
ca/on with the City of Moorpark. The applica/on was on track to be processed in accordance
with the City’s Ordinance No. 2015-3466. A Design Review mee/ng was held at the City on Jan-
uary 8th, and a revised plan was prepared to address those City and Agency comments. A plan
package was resubmiTed on February 26, 2020, and the project was scheduled for the March
16, 2020 Community and Economic Development CommiTee (CEDC).
The March 18, 2020 Community & Economic Development CommiTee (CEDC) mee/ng, was de-
layed just over three months, due to COVID-19 crisis, and was held on June 24, 2020. CEDC did
not make a recommenda/on on the proposed Site Plan at that /me, but con/nued the mee/ng
to September 16, 2020. The applicant was directed to meet with local community to con/nue
discussions regarding their specific design comments and to prepare a new Site Plan for CEDC
approval. As such, the following three levels of community input efforts were undertaken:
1.In-Person Community Mee/ngs
a. Thursday, November 14, 2019 Mee/ng @ Foursquare Church held to introduce
the proposed project.
b.Saturday, July 11, 2020 @ Foursquare Church (respec/ng social distancing) to as-
certain immediate neighborhood design and project concerns.
c.Wednesday, July 31, 2020 Mee/ng. The Maureen Lane neighborhood scheduled
an in-person mee/ng and invited Warmington to aTend. Two of our representa-
/ves aTended this mee/ng and answered ques/ons and listened to addi/onal
site plan design comments/concerns.
d.Wednesday, August 5, 2020 Mee/ng @ Foursquare Church (respec/ng social dis-
tancing) held to present the significantly revised Site Plan the neighbors. The
new plan was developed based on extensive community input and we listened to
any other concerns/comments.
NOTE: All of our mee/ngs were no/ced via USPS to the approximately 300
homes in the Heather Glen and Maureen Lane neighborhoods that surround the
subject site.
1
ATTACHMENT D
172
e.Mee/ng Goals:
i.Acknowledge that the neighbors would not support the 102-unit Site Plan
based on density, setbacks, view, and other issues impac/ng the area.
ii.Discuss community concerns regarding density, setbacks, design, height,
privacy, sunlight, public access, green space, and other items to consider
in developing the revised Site Plan.
iii.Gauge community-wide concern over the Beltramo Ranch proposal once
key facts and site constraints/opportuni/es were presented.
2.Zoom Community Mee/ngs
a. July 13, 2020 Zoom mee/ng held for Maureen Lane residents.
b.July 15, 2020 Zoom mee/ng held for LoreTa Drive residents.
c.July 22, 2020 Zoom mee/ng held for Heather Glen residents.
NOTE: All mee/ngs were no/ced via USPS to approximately 300 homes sur-
rounding the subject site.
d.Mee/ng Goals:
i.Offer to meet with neighbors through zoom (respec/ng social distancing)
in groups, neighborhoods, or individually to gain an understanding of lo-
cal concerns to address (to the extent possible) in the new Site Plan.
ii.Obtain impressions of possible Beltramo Ranch product types preferred
and site layout requests.
iii.Understand areas of conflict and coopera/on.
3.Project Website (BELTRAMOMOORPARK.COM)
a. Offer a website including project informa/on and history, including pos/ng the
various project Site Plans.
b.Website Goals:
i.Provide a plakorm for anyone to email comments regarding the proposed
project for the applicant’s benefit to understand project pros and cons.
Community Outreach Findings:
1.Issues of local concern are summarized below:
•Property Line Setbacks: Neighbors want an increased setback from 10' or a drive aisle
to provide a buffer. Majority of the homeowners that back to the western and eastern
property lines prefer a drive aisle with a 6-8’ wall and landscape buffer instead of a
backyard of a home. A taller wall and landscape screening was also requested on the
southern por/on of the developed area for the adjoining backyards to the LoreTa
Drive homes.
•Height: concern regarding height of homes compared to their home height and grade
difference. Privacy and sunlight are also concerns.
•Density: Concern over too many homes on 7-acre site. Would like a less dense project
that is compa/ble with exis/ng homes/neighborhoods.
2
173
•Drainage: Want more informa/on about flood zone and project drainage (through en-
/tlement applica/on).
•Community Benefit: want legal access through southern por/on of site to access trail
by the Arroyo and use of addi/onal public green space.
•Lore<a Drive Homes Horse Access: Horse people want con/nued access to their prop-
erty to trailer horses via Beltramo Ranch Road to the rear of their proper/es through
the SCE owned property.
•Lore<a Drive Access: LoreTa Drive residents would like a gate at the west end of
LoreTa Drive to maintain private vehicular access to authorized users only, while main-
taining public pedestrian access on the south side of LoreTa Drive.
•Acous?cal Study: requested as part of en/tlement applica/on.
•Emergency Access: requested this be addressed as part of en/tlement applica/on.
•Traffic/Parking/Emergency Access: concern over traffic and parking impacts and
emergency evacua/on route; requested study as part of en/tlement applica/on.
•Dog Park: concerns over smell and barking; prefer not to have a dog park there.
•Affordable Housing Units: Some residents expressed that they did not want affordable
housing included as part of the project at this loca/on.
2.Awareness and opinions over what could be developed on the site
a. Many neighbors thought that the site would always stay as a church use and not
ever be developed.
b.Many neighbors enjoy the use of the vacant private property or using open space
to access the Arroyo Simi.
c.Many neighbors do not want the site to change at all.
d.Many neighbors wanted a residen/al development that is similar to the home
types surrounding the project site, with open space connec/ons provided.
e.Some neighbors expressed concerns over their property being reclassified into a
FEMA flood zone due to Beltramo project development (resul/ng in flood insur-
ance to be required).
Site Plan Changes Implemented
The results of our community mee/ngs provided valuable input for the revised Site Plan design.
Ques/on and Answer sessions and feedback received from these mee/ngs centered on the
following topics:
•Property Line Setbacks/Buffer
•Project Density
•Building Height/Privacy Views/Sunlight
•Architecture/Product Type/Community Character
•Open Space/Trail Connec/ons
•Traffic, Parking, and Emergency Access
3
174
Our design team collaborated to discuss these iden/fied topics and we held several internal
land planning sessions over the past few weeks to develop a brand new Site Plan. We did our
best to respond to all of the community and CEDC council member concerns iden/fied.
Below is a descrip/on of specific changes incorporated into the revised Site Plan:
Property Line Setbacks/Buffer
Our approach to providing ample property line setbacks was to consider the western and east-
ern boundaries of the subject site as “cri/cal areas of concern” based on input from the local
residents. The residents collec/vely preferred that the modified design placed the road along
the edges of the property to provide a vast setback and placing the homes toward the interior
of the development pad. This was much preferred over an increased setback to a backyard and
house. We further increased the setbacks by providing an enhanced landscape buffer strip be-
tween the realigned road and the property lines to the west, south, and east.
GOAL: Exceed minimum code standards for setback requirements of the R-1 Zone and provide
the road design requested by neighbors to accommodate a substan?al setback.
Project Density
The project density, or number of dwelling units per acre, was greatly reduced in the revised
Site Plan. The new plan accounts for a loss of 33 units and provides for a project density of 9.3
units per acre. This is a significant reduc/on from the prior plan which equated to 13.8 units
per acre. Further, the mix of detached and aTached homes mimic the exis/ng subdivision to
the west, and offers a beTer transi/on to adjacent single-family homes to the south and east.
GOAL: Balance community housing needs with compa?ble densi?es surrounding the site and
local areas.
Building Height/Privacy Views/Sunlight
Due to the change in product type, the heights of the homes are slightly lower than the town-
home product. It is an/cipated that the single-family homes and duplexes will be no more than
26’- 29’ in height at the top of the roof ridge. Moreover, with the new arrangement of the
homes at the interior of the site, with considerable setbacks from the adjacent homes, the
building heights, privacy views, and sunlight impacts are greatly reduced.
GOAL: Provide compa?ble building heights with adjacent proper?es to lessen view and loss of
sunlight Impacts.
4
175
Architecture/Product Type/Community Character
The revised site plan is compa/ble with other residen/al uses surrounding the subject site.
Compa/bility is primarily achieved through generous setbacks from adjacent structures, reloca-
/on of the in-tract loop road design and landscape strip to provide a wide buffer at the western
and eastern property lines, and a change to the product type ploTed.
The product type changed from fiseen townhome buildings to 47 single-family detached homes
and 22 duplex homes. These homes are in scale with nearby exis/ng neighborhoods such that
it will not adversely impact exis/ng uses.
GOAL: Provide a compa?ble mix of housing types consistent with the local area, with higher
density product closer to the western por?on of the site and lower density products closer to the
eastern and southern property boundaries.
Open Space/Trail Connec/ons
The Arroyo Simi and Glenwood Park provide for local recrea/on opportuni/es now and in the
future. The southern “panhandle” of the site presents an opportunity for open space connec-
/ons to these important local ameni/es. We propose to enhance the open space as a “green
space” providing complementary passive areas adjacent to the park. We propose a public gate
to be installed for access between the subject site and Glenwood Park. We also propose a con-
nec/on through our property to the south toward the Arroyo via an addi/onal gate. While, we
can’t offer to improve a full connec/on to the Arroyo, since Southern California Edison owns the
area between our property and the Arroyo Simi, we can create legal access through our parcel
to provide enhanced connec/vity.
GOAL: Offer public open space/green passive space, and footpath connec?ons to other nearby
open spaces as a community benefit.
Traffic/Parking/Emergency Access
Based on input from City staff and CALTRANS, the exis/ng entrance/exit alignment was retained
off New Los Angeles Avenue to serve the subject site. There is one project entrance and exit
serving the development. The proposed configura/on provides for an added right turn lane,
while maintaining a les turn lane at the project driveway entrance. It is an/cipated that some
restriping will take place as part of frontage improvements and the middle turn lane will con/n-
ue to provide for les turns into the site for vehicles traveling westbound on L.A Ave.
The project provides for two parking spaces in each garage and one parking space in the drive-
way for single-family homes and two garage spaces for the duplexes. The City development
code does not require guest parking for single-family homes or duplexes. The reason for this, is
that typically parking is met through garage parking or driveway parking spaces provided. Nev-
ertheless, we have provided 35 parking spaces throughout the site for guests, resul/ng in a
project parking count of 3.2 spaces per dwelling unit.
5
176
As part of the en/tlement process, a full traffic, circula/on and emergency access study will be
prepared. These reports will be reviewed by the City and applicable agencies to determine if
there are any project impacts and if any mi/ga/on is required.
GOAL: Design the vehicular circula?on systems that are adequate, safe, and efficient.
Summary
In summary, the 102 Unit Site Plan was discarded based CEDC review and public comments re-
ceived on June 24, 2020. Aser extensive community outreach efforts, we designed a signifi-
cantly different Site Plan and layout.
We strongly feel that we have listened to and addressed the CEDC and community concerns
with the roll out of this new plan. We have decreased the project density by 32%, increased
property line setbacks and buffers for the western adjacent proper/es (with 20’ at the northern
property line and 41.5’ for the remainder of the western boundary to the duplexes), maintained
a large setback at the eastern property line, added landscape screening buffers, realigned the
in-tract loop road, changed homes to a predominantly detached product with some duplexes,
reduced building heights, provided 35 guest parking space (zero guest parking spaces are
required by code, and expanded the park area (+25,000 square feet for a total of 45,000 square
feet), while offering legal public access and gate connec/ons through our site.
Table 1, aTached, summarizes a comparison between the prior 102-unit townhome site plan
and the current proposed site plan.
Warmington Residen/al desires to build a quality project that provides Moorpark with new
homes that are accepted by the local neighborhoods and compa/ble with this area of the
community.
6
177
TABLE 1
PROJECT COMPARISON SUMMARY MATRIX
GENERAL TOPIC CEDC PLAN
(2.26.2020)
CEDC #2 PLAN
(9.3.2020)
DIFFERENCE
UNIT COUNT
102 HOMES 69 HOMES 33 LESS HOMES
DENSITY 13.8 DU/AC 9.3 DU/AC 4.5/AC LESS
BUFFER BETWEEN
PROPERTY LINES (PL)
SETBACK 10’ PER
CODE REQUIREMENT
ON WESTERN PL/
ROAD AND PARKING
ON EASTERN PL
INCREASED SETBACKS ON
WESTERN PL/ROAD
AGAINST ALL PROPERTY
LINES
ENHANCED BUFFERS
THROUGH ROAD DESIGN
AND INCREASED
SETBACKS
PRODUCT TYPE TOWNHOMES SINGLE-FAMLY &
DUPLEXES
HYBRID DETACHED AND
ATTACHED
WESTERN PROPERTY LINE
SETBACK 10’20’ TO SFD #23
45’ to DUPLEXES 10’ - 35’ MORE
EASTERN PROPERTY LINE
SETBACK 52’’15’ TO SFD #27
41.5’ TO SFD #56 -#69 (20.5’ - 26’) LESS
SOUTHERN PROPERTY LINE
SETBACK (@ LORETTA
BACKYARDS)
28’41’13’ MORE
NORTHERN PROPERTY LINE
SETBACK 25’25’NO CHANGE
HEIGHT- SINGLE-FAMILY 30’ MAX 26’ MAX 4’ LESS
HEIGHT- DUPLEXES 30’ MAX 29’ MAX 1’ LESS
PUBLIC ACCESS TO PARK PEDESTRIAN GATE PEDESTRIAN GATE NO CHANGE
PUBLIC CONNECTION
THROUGH PROPERTY NEAR
ARROYO SIMI
OPEN SPACE/TRAIL OPEN SPACE/TRAIL
PEDESTRIAN GATE
PEDESTRIAN GATE
ADDED
HORSE PROPERTY ACCESS MAINTAIN CURRENT
ACCESS THROUGH
BELTRAMO ROAD
MAINTAIN CURRENT
ACCESS THROUGH
BELTRAMO ROAD
ADDED PRIVATE GATE
FOR LORETTA DRIVE
PRIVATE LANE TO BE
MAINTAINED BY
BELTRAMO HOA
FLOOD ZONE AVOID BUILDING IN
FLOOD ZONE/WILL
DESIGN TO NOT
CHANGE FEMA
MAPPING
DESIGNATIONS
AVOID BUILDING IN
FLOOD ZONE/WILL
DESIGN TO NOT CHANGE
FEMA MAPPING
DESIGNATIONS
NO CHANGE
OPEN SPACE PROVIDE ONSITE
OPEN SPACE FOR
PUBLIC BENEFIT
PROVIDE 45,000 SF
ONSITE OPEN SPACE FOR
PUBLIC BENEFIT
25,000 SF MORE
178
From:Patricia Colman
To:Planning
Subject:Proposed building project
Date:Wednesday, September 09, 2020 11:41:43 AM
Hello,
I am writing this email in support of the proposed housing development at Los Angeles
Avenue and Beltramo Road (the current site of the Four-Square Church). My husband and I
love living and working in Moorpark. But unfortunately, I've seen many prospective residents
turned away due to the lack of available affordable housing. Moorpark College is ranked the
#4 community college in the nation and we pride ourselves on hiring excellent faculty, staff,
and administrators. However, I have personally seen prospective employees, especially people
early in their careers, turn down employment because they cannot find adequate housing in
the city of Moorpark. New, modern, affordable single family homes are desperately needed
here, and our entire community would benefit if this development was approved.
Thank you for your time,
Patty Colman
Patty Colman
History Professor, Moorpark College
ATTACHMENT E
179
From:SHARON CLUGSTON
To:Planning
Date:Thursday, September 10, 2020 9:12:37 AM
To: Moorpark Community & Economic Development Standing Committee
Councilmembers Roseann Mikos and David Pollack (cc: Mayor Janice Parvin, Councilmembers
Ken Simons
and Chris Enegren)
Re. General Plan Amendment Application for Proposed Beltramo Ranch Community
Honorable Councilmembers Roseann Mikos and David Pollack:
I wish to express my concerns about the proposed Beltramo Ranch development on Los Angeles
Avenue, which is adjacent to my HOA, Heather Glen, and the communities on Maureen Lane and
Loretta Drive. Granted, the Warmington Group have made some changes to the original plan, but
they are insufficient to satisfactorily address the issues that are causing me and many others the
most concern. These concerns include the following:
1. A development of this density doesn’t blend into either community’s character
2. Parking, still, despite the additional spaces that have appeared on the latest plan. Of
particular concern for the folks who live on Elderberry is the addition of 7 more spaces against
the perimeter wall since the last plan we were shown and the apparent removal of promised
green belt landscaping to accommodate these new spaces. The additional noise and light
pollution right outside bedroom windows is also a concern. Plus, there’s no street parking and
only 2-3 spaces p/unit, so overflow parking in Heather Glen remains a very real concern.
3. Increased chances of collisions associated with the single ingress from/egress to Hwy #118
, especially where the middle lane is being used for left hand turns.
4. Backup traffic for left had turns onto Tierra Rejada from the #118.
5. Increased congestion on LA Avenue, which is already a huge headache during rush hours
and promises to become a real nightmare once the other approved developments on LA
Avenue are completed.
There are other objections that I and others have to this development, but almost all these
objections relate to trying to preserve the quality of life that we enjoy in our little slice of Moorpark.
We moved here for the serene and semi-rural nature of Heather Glen at the outside edge of
Moorpark. And we want our neighbors on Maureen Lane and Loretta Drive to be able to keep the
unique, old Moorpark ambiance they enjoy as well. Allowing this development to proceed will
significantly change both our worlds.
As a citizen of Moorpark who loves this community and especially cherishes the ambiance and
character of the neighborhood I live in here, I urge the Committee and the Council to not approve
the General Plan Amendment requested by the Warmington Group. If the project appeals to you,
please find another parcel where it won’t impact the quality of life of people who have chosen their
180
homes for that very blessing.
Thank you,
Gladys Sharon Clugston
181
From:Cindy
To:Planning
Subject:Beltramo Ranch development
Date:Thursday, September 10, 2020 8:39:58 AM
To: Moorpark Community & Economic Development Standing Committee
Councilmembers Roseann Mikos and David Pollack (cc: Mayor Janice Parvin, Councilmembers
Ken Simons
and Chris Enegren)
Re. General Plan Amendment Application for Proposed Beltramo Ranch Community
Honorable Councilmembers Roseann Mikos and David Pollack:
I wish to express my concerns about the proposed Beltramo Ranch development on Los Angeles
Avenue, which is adjacent to my HOA, Heather Glen, and the communities on Maureen Lane and
Loretta Drive. Granted, the Warmington Group have made some changes to the original plan, but
they are insufficient to satisfactorily address the issues that are causing me and many others the
most concern. These concerns include the following:
1. A development of this density doesn’t blend into either community’s character 2. Parking,
still, despite the additional spaces that have appeared on the latest plan. Of particular concern
for the folks who live on Elderberry is the addition of 7 more spaces against the perimeter wall
since the last plan we were shown and the apparent removal of promised green belt
landscaping to accommodate these new spaces. The additional noise and light pollution right
outside bedroom windows is also a concern. Plus, there’s no street parking and only 2-3
spaces p/unit, so overflow parking in Heather Glen remains a very real concern. 3. Increased
chances of collisions associated with the single ingress from/egress to Hwy #118 , especially
where the middle lane is being used for left hand turns. 4. Backup traffic for left had turns onto
Tierra Rejada from the #118. 5. Increased congestion on LA Avenue, which is already a huge
headache during rush hours and promises to become a real nightmare once the other
approved developments on LA Avenue are completed.
There are other objections that I and others have to this development, but almost all these
objections relate to trying to preserve the quality of life that we enjoy in our little slice of Moorpark.
We moved here for the serene and semi-rural nature of Heather Glen at the outside edge of
Moorpark. And we want our neighbors on Maureen Lane and Loretta Drive to be able to keep the
unique, old Moorpark ambiance they enjoy as well. Allowing this development to proceed will
significantly change both our worlds.
As a citizen of Moorpark who loves this community and especially cherishes the ambiance and
character of the neighborhood I live in here, I urge the Committee and the Council to not approve
the General Plan Amendment requested by the Warmington Group. If the project appeals to you,
182
please find another parcel where it won’t impact the quality of life of people who have chosen their
homes for that very blessing.
Thank you,
Rock & Cynthia Ake
Sent from AT&T Yahoo Mail for iPad
183
184
185
186
As a citizen of Moorpark who loves this community and especially cherishes the ambiance and
character of the neighborhood I live in here, I urge the Committee and the Council to not
approve the General Plan Amendment requested by the Warmington Group. If the project
appeals to you, please find another parcel where it won’t impact the quality of life of people who
have chosen their homes for that very blessing.
Thank you,
Angela and Richar Zapata
187
188
the General Plan Amendment requested by the Warmington Group. If the project appeals to you,
please find another parcel where it won’t impact the quality of life of people who have chosen their
homes for that very blessing.
Thank you,
Susan Korotzer
189
From:Brian Berry
To:Roseann Mikos; David Pollock
Cc:Janice S. Parvin; Ken Simons; Chris Enegren; Mary Berry; Shanna Farley-Judkins
Subject:Revised General Plan Amendment Pre-Screening No. 2019-02 - Beltramo Ranch Development
Date:Thursday, September 10, 2020 12:53:42 PM
City Council Members Roseann Mikos and David Pollack:
I trust this email finds you both well. We are contacting you again as 30 year
residents of Moorpark residing at 4802 Elderberry Ave. After meeting with the
Warmington Group representatives on three occasions, which included the Heather
Glen, Maureen Lane and Loretta Drive communities what we have learned from these
interactions is that the developer has not seriously engaged the affected
communities. They have displayed nothing but arrogance, dismissiveness and
condensation towards all parties involved.
The developer has not fulfilled their obligation by misrepresentation and detachment.
Warmington continues to come back with revisions to Beltramo Ranch but are still not
addressing the quality of life issues which directly affect us who live on Elderberry
Ave. For example a new 6’ to 8’ wall, a 4’ planter, and a tree line of 20’ trees with
parking along the length of Elderberry Ave. This would only give us a 4’ buffer which
is totally unacceptable to us (noise, traffic, pollution & lighting, etc.). The Warmington
Groups’ stance is that this project is a done deal and a slam dunk.
We and the Heather Glen HOA implore the Community Development Department and
the full Council not to even entertain this preposterous project in such a small area
and not revise the General Plan Amendment Pre-Screening No. 2019-02 and put an
end to this nonsensical development.
Respectfully,
Brian Berry
Mary Berry
Brian & Mary Berry
190
From:Buzz Buchanan
To:Planning
Subject:Prospective development at LA Ave and Beltramo Rd.
Date:Thursday, September 10, 2020 1:15:31 PM
Dear Moorpark Planning:
I recently learned that Warmington Homes is seeking approval to submit an application for a new
residential development at Los Angeles Avenue and Beltramo Road.
As 28 year Moorpark residents and parents of 2 Moorpark High graduates, my wife and I look
forward to our sons returning to our community to begin their families. Unfortunately Moorpark is
so short of affordable housing, our sons will likely have to locate elsewhere, increasing the likelihood
that we will eventually relocate as well.
Shortly after our home was built, the builder went bankrupt and Warmington stepped in to
complete the project. We remember Warmington as being very attuned to the needs of our
community, working with existing homeowners to ensure that completion of the development met
our expectations, which it did.
We hope Warmington’s project is approved to go to the next step so that more young families have
the opportunity join our community.
Regards,
Buzz Buchanan
191
192
keep the unique, old Moorpark ambiance they enjoy as well. Allowing this development to
proceed will significantly change both our worlds.
As a citizen of Moorpark who loves this community and especially cherishes the ambiance and
character of the neighborhood I live in here, I urge the Committee and the Council to not
approve the General Plan Amendment requested by the Warmington Group. If the project
appeals to you, please find another parcel where it won’t impact the quality of life of people who
have chosen their homes for that very blessing.
Thank you,
Chan-Tang Tsen
Eugenia Tsen
193
194
Thank you,
Ann-Marie and Lee Brummond
195
From: Chris White [mailto:chris.white@avmetrics.net]
Sent: Friday, September 11, 2020 7:26 AM
To: City Council & City Manager
Subject: Re. General Plan Amendment Application for Proposed Beltramo Ranch Community
Honorable Councilmembers Roseann Mikos and David Pollack:
I wish to express my concerns about the proposed Beltramo Ranch development on Los Angeles
Avenue, which is adjacent to my HOA, Heather Glen, and the communities on Maureen Lane and
Loretta Drive. Granted, the Warmington Group have made some changes to the original plan, but
they are insufficient to satisfactorily address the issues that are causing me and many others the
most concern. These concerns include the following:
1.A development of this density doesn’t blend into either community’s character
2.Parking, still, despite the additional spaces that have appeared on the latest plan. Of
particular concern for the folks who live on Elderberry is the addition of 7 more spaces against
the perimeter wall since the last plan we were shown and the apparent removal of promised
green belt landscaping to accommodate these new spaces. The additional noise and light
pollution right outside bedroom windows is also a concern. Plus, there’s no street parking and
only 2-3 spaces p/unit, so overflow parking in Heather Glen remains a very real concern.
3.Increased chances of collisions associated with the single ingress from/egress to Hwy #118
, especially where the middle lane is being used for left hand turns.
4.Backup traffic for left had turns onto Tierra Rejada from the #118.
5.Increased congestion on LA Avenue, which is already a huge headache during rush hours
and promises to become a real nightmare once the other approved developments on LA
Avenue are completed.
There are other objections that I and others have to this development, but all these objections
relate to trying to preserve the quality of life that we enjoy in our little slice of Moorpark. We moved
here for the serene and semi-rural nature of Heather Glen at the outside edge of Moorpark. And
we want our neighbors on Maureen Lane and Loretta Drive to be able to keep the unique, old
Moorpark ambiance they enjoy as well. Allowing this development to proceed will significantly
change both our worlds.
As a citizen of Moorpark who loves this community and especially cherishes the ambiance and
character of the neighborhood I live in here, I urge the Committee and the Council to not approve
the General Plan Amendment requested by the Warmington Group. If the project appeals to you,
please find another parcel where it won’t impact the quality of life of people who have chosen their
homes for that very blessing.
Thank you,
Chris white (HOA president Heather Glen)
Chris White
196
Chris.White@avmetrics.net
805.421.5056 x111 (Primary)
www.avmetrics.net
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This electronic mail transmission may contain legally privileged, confidential information
belonging to the sender. The information is intended only for the use of the individual or entity named above. If you are
not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or taking any action based
on the contents of this electronic mail is strictly prohibited. If you have received this electronic mail in error, please
contact sender and delete all copies.
197
September 10, 2020
Janice S. Parv i n, Mayor, Roseann Mikos, PhD ., David Pollack, Mayor Pro Tern,
Ken Simons, Chris Enegren, Moorpark City Council Members
799 Moorpark Avenue
Moorpark, California 93021
Re: Beltramo Ranch Project
Dear Madam Mayor Parvin and Moorpark City Council Members:
As a resident of the Heather Glen Community, I wish to address my concerns regarding the proposed
Beltramo Ranch Project. Warmington Residential is intending to build approximately 68 single family
homes and paired homes on the 7 .4 acre property situated east of the intersection of Los Angeles
Avenue {State Route 118) and Tierra Rejada Road.
The intended project will seriously impact all properties adjacent to it. The traffic on Los Angeles
Avenue and at the signal at Tierra Rejada Road is already impacted with cars and various hauling
vehicles going to and coming from the Ventura, Oxnard, Santa Barbara , Saticoy and Santa Paula areas.
Los Angeles Avenue is a highly traveled road at all hours of the day and night. With additional housing
being proposed, there will be additional congestion of traffic to contend with, as well as added pollution
to our neighborhood .
This proposed project will also negatively affect the schools in this Moorpark area . Possibly the current
schools may not be equipped to accommodate new students; as other projects nearby that have been
approved , will also cause more traffic .
Many of our retail businesses in Moorpark are closing. Where are all of these new residents going to
shop?
The houses on Maureen Lane are rural and quaint. The residents enjoy their sweet block of homes.
lived on Maureen Lane before joining the Heather Glen Community, and know a few of my old
neighbors are quite upset at the prospect of this project being built right up against their back fence .
They are also concerned with traffic traveling their street because they have a traffic signal.
Warmington Residential will promise everything to receive clearance from your fine council. Please
exercise your due diligence, and study their proposals judicially, before you consider granting this
builder a permit. Many people are counting on you to use your best and most fair judgment in this
matter. Allowing this project to go further, will not be progress; it will greatly disturb the peace and
tranquility of the whole area surrounding Los Angeles Avenue and Tierra Rejada Road .
I thank you for the opportunity of expressing my concerns, as well as the concerns of others .
Sincerely, Maureen Baker
198
SUPPLEMENTAL
COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT STANDING COMMITTEE
SUPPLEMENTAL
AGENDA REPORT
TO: Community and Economic Development Standing Committee
(Councilmember Mikos and Councilmember Pollock)
FROM: Karen Vaughn, Community Development Director
BY: Shanna Farley-Judkins, Principal Planner
DATE: 09/16/2020 Special Meeting
SUBJECT: Consider Revised General Plan Amendment Pre-Screening
Application No. 2019-02 to Allow a General Plan Amendment
Application to be Filed to Change the Land Use Designation from
Low Density Residential (L), High Density Residential (H) and Open
Space and Recreation (P) to Very High Density Residential (VH) for
the Development of a 69-Unit Residential Project located on 7.4
Acres of Property at the Southeast Corner of Los Angeles Avenue
and Beltramo Ranch Road, on the Application of Jay Deckard (for
Warmington Group)
CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Subsequent to the preparation of the staff report, the following correspondence was
received from members of the public.
Attachments
Item: 4.A.
199
From:PRIVATE
To:Shanna Farley-Judkins; Planning
Subject:General Plan Amendment Pre-Screening No. 2019-02
Date:Friday, September 11, 2020 4:30:31 PM
Dear Shanna,
You have not included a website to review any proposed site layout with buildings and I will not be
able to attend the meeting as I will be travelling. If possible I will attend via Zoom.
I believe a change to Very High density is NOT compatable with the surrounding neighborhood areas
and traffic. I often see kids playing in the street on Maureen, and adding 69 units of traffic to that
otherwise quiet neighborhood street makes no sense.
To enter the proposed development from the east, virtually ALL traffic will have to come through
Maureen. To exit the development and head west, virtually all traffic will drive through Maureen.
On trash day Maureen is congested with trash cans. Is the capacity of Maureen adequate for this
project?
Very High Density puts people on top of each other, and uncomfortably close to the homes on
Maureen and Elderberry. Some properties values on Maureen and Elderberry may be negatively
impacted by multi-story condos looking in their backyards.
Very High Density means there will likely be inadequate parking and no overflow place to park if the
streets are full. Correct density helps insure adequate light and air, reduces parking congestion
during fire and traffic hazards, and contributes to the creation of a pleasing neighborhood. A condo
project can have management challenges that cannot address urgent traffic and congestion issues
after hours and on weekends, and that further creates an uncomfortable neighborhood. A condo
project of this density would, in my opinion, create more permanent problems for the 69 families
that would live there than the city, or the residents anticipate, and once built, there really is no going
back.
I am not in favor of a density greater than that on Elderberry to the west (RPD-8.4U).
Best regards,
Philip Ochoa, Owner
200
From:Jennifer Lenaburg
To:Planning
Subject:General Plan Amendment Pre-Screening No. 2019-02 public hearing
Date:Monday, September 14, 2020 9:20:43 AM
To Community and Economic Development Standing Committee;
We strongly oppose the zoning change for the General Plan Amendment Pre-Screening No.
2019-02 from Low Density Residential to Very High Density Residential. The Southeast corner
of Los Angeles Avenue and Beltramo Road.
We feel that the small space does not support a 69unit high density condominium project. It
would destroy the little bit of rural atmosphere we have left in our neighborhood as the city
has grown up around us.
It would cause more traffic, privacy issues for the houses located on Maureen Lane as two
story condos would overlook right into the property, noise, etc.
Please do not approve this change.
The Padilla Household
201
From:Paul Farley
To:Planning; City Council & City Manager
Subject:Community and Economic Development Standing Committee : Beltramo Ranch Project (correction)
Date:Monday, September 14, 2020 10:41:07 AM
Honorable Council Members Roseann Mikos and David Pollack
I am writing this email to convey my concerns regarding the Beltramo Ranch project. Please hear
the tone of the existing neighborhoods on both sides of this proposal. Our neighbors in the Heather
Glen community as well as the residents of Maureen Lane and Loretta Drive are against any approval
for this project to move forward.
I feel that the developer does not understand the impact caused by their proposal.
Moorpark General Plan policy 4.2 clearly states: Existing neighborhoods shall be protected and
preserved in order to maintain their character and identity. Maureen Lane has been active in
protecting their rural character for many years. This proposal does not seem to share that design.
The developer’s latest plan took away 20- 25’ of setbacks from the eastern edge (Maureen Lane
side) of the project (see project matrix summary table 1). Yet they claim in their Quantitative design
findings that they increased setbacks on the east side. Not true. This does not sound anything like
they understand we are rural, have livestock and are zoned to have horses and farm animals. I
believe they did this to cram parking along the Heather Glen boundary which in itself lends to
additional problems. The streets on the plan are ridiculously narrow at 25’. The current street size
in Heather Glen is closer to 34 feet. Reminder the existing lots that border Maureen Lane are zoned
two /acre residential. For good reason.
Moorpark General Plan policy 5.2: Infill development in existing residential neighborhoods shall be
compatible with the scale and character of the surrounding neighborhood. Maureen Lane homes
that border the west boundary are ALL single-story homes. ALL of them. The Heather Glen
community is a mixture of single story and two-story homes. How does this infill appear at all
compatible?
This project takes some large residential parcels which border Maureen Lane and Loretta and try to
shoehorn in the density of one small parcel zoned high density next to Beltramo Rd and turn the
whole mess into a high density project that just doesn’t fit either existing neighborhood. The
developer is missing the mark.
I believe the developer is doing just enough to try and pacify the critics and I believe there are way
too many contingent items that the developer is ignoring for this project to be considered as
presented. Please hear the existing neighborhoods, those of us who live here, and vote against this
project as presented.
Please preserve the integrity of our rural neighborhood.
Thank You,
Paul Farley
Maureen Lane Moorpark
202
203
204
205
From:David McGarry
To:Planning
Subject:Beltramo Ranch development
Date:Monday, September 14, 2020 12:28:12 PM
Dear Planning Department,
I am writing to you today to express our continued opposition to the zoning change request for the
Beltramo Ranch project on Los Angeles Avenue.
I realize the Warmington group has tried to address concerns that have been raised by the
neighborhoods on either side of this proposed project. While I was somewhat happy to see a
willingness to work with our neighborhoods, they still wish to development a very high density
residential complex on a piece of property sandwiched in between to neighborhoods that are less
dense. The fact that the city is considering allowing the change is disheartening. For those of us that
border the subject project, we are very concerned, not to mention unhappy with how a
development of this density will affect our life. Loss of privacy, increased noise, lowering of our
property values, are concerns that we all share.
If Warmington is to develop this piece of property, we ask that the city hold fast on the General Plan
that has been in place for decades. There is no compelling reason to change the zoning of the
subject property, and therefore, respectfully, we ask that the change be denied.
Thank you,
206
207
the General Plan Amendment requested by the Warmington Group. If the project appeals to you,
please find another parcel where it won’t impact the quality of life of people who have chosen their
homes for that very blessing.
Thank you,
Mike & Olivia Whitelaw
208
From:Charity Katz
To:Planning
Subject:Regarding Warmington Development Plans
Date:Monday, September 14, 2020 3:49:11 PM
September 14, 2020
To: Moorpark Community & Economic Development Standing Committee Councilmembers Roseann
Mikos and David Pollack (cc: Mayor Janice Parvin, Councilmembers Ken Simons and Chris Enegren)
Re. General Plan Amendment Application for Proposed Beltramo Ranch Community
Honorable Councilmembers Roseann Mikos and David Pollack:
I wish to express my concerns about the proposed Beltramo Ranch development on Los Angeles
Avenue, which is adjacent to my HOA, Heather Glen, and the communities on Maureen Lane and Loretta
Drive. While the group has seemingly taken into account many of our concerns, I believe there are still
outstanding items that do not seem to have been addressed.
1. While I appreciate that some guest parking has been included, there are still far fewer guest spaces
than seem necessary. There are ONLY 14 spots for 47 homes. I contacted the group, and was informed
that there won't be parking in front of the houses. So while they will have driveways and garages, there
will not be enough parking for the cars and extra guests. I state this from experience. How many people
choose not to park in their garages as they use them for storage, gyms, extra living space, etc? Each
home has only one driveway space. When they have more cars than driveway space, where will they
park? The guest parking. Then, when those are full, where will they park? The Heather Glen
neighborhood, which is already very limited on street parking. This is an issue for those of us in Heather
Glen, especially with there being an open walkway straight from our neighborhood to this new
development.
I lived in a development that implemented parking restrictions to free up guest parking, which resulted in
the occupants parking in the adjacent neighborhood. It did not increase garage utilization.
My past experience shows that the overflow always goes to the adjoining neighborhoods. That will be
very problematic, and potentially costly to Heather Glen as we would likely have to enforce parking rules
in our HOA with some sort of permitting system and security to prevent people from parking from another
neighborhood. We should not have to take on that financially and physical responsibility.
A solution could be to increase guest parking, and update the design to allow for street parking in front of
the houses. Looking at the Moorpark page on the proposed development, their guest parking spots
actually decreased from their original design. That is very troubling.
2. With only one entrance and exit for the new development, the increased chances for an accident are
exponential. That stretch, in particular, is already dangerous, and increasing unprotected left turns,
especially during rush hours, has the potential to be catastrophic. With 47 homes of 3-4 bedrooms, it is
reasonable to expect a minimum of 100+ cars turning in and out of there multiple times per day. I would
imagine that is, in part, why that area has been designated as low density as it is just not safe. How will
this be resolved in the future? It seems the only way this may be resolved is by adding access through
either Heath Glen or Maureen/Loretta Drive, and neither of those is a reasonable solution as they will
increase traffic congestion and decrease the safety in neighborhoods that have very little traffic except for
those who live there.
3. Increased congestion on LA Avenue, which is already a huge headache during rush hours and
promises to become a real nightmare once the other approved developments on LA Avenue are
completed. Another development is NOT needed right off of LA Avenue. The city cannot handle it on its
main road where the majority of our commerce is. This will also force more people onto Poindexter and
209
Tierra Rejada, creating more disruption for those areas. In addition, Poindexter already experiences
concerns with accidents and people driving too fast - especially by the school. This will make that worse.
4. How will guaranteed access to the Arroyo be maintained? Right now the proposed green space being
added is where the pedestrian access to that area is, and while there is nothing stating they will limit it or
close it, we were told, they would explicitly add permanent access in writing to the plans, but I do not see
that. How will that be enforced once all the units are sold?
5. Overcrowding in schools is an issue already, and I do not see how adding hundreds of new homes
between this and other developments, with potentially thousands of new students (when there is more
than one child in the home) will work with the limited school slots currently available. We are introducing
more children than are graduating, and we are adding to that burden with these new developments while
cutting school funds and resources - e.g., our librarians for one.
There are other objections that I and others have to this development, but almost all these objections
relate to trying to preserve the quality of life that we enjoy in our little slice of Moorpark. I purchased my
home in Heather Glen because it was a quiet, family community. I want to keep it that way without feeling
like I am living in a congested city. I also have concerns for our neighbors on Maureen Lane and Loretta
Drive and want them to be able to keep the unique, old Moorpark ambiance they enjoy as well. Allowing
this development to proceed will significantly change both our worlds.
As a citizen of Moorpark who loves this community and especially cherishes the ambiance and character
of the neighborhood I live in here, I urge the Committee and the Council to not approve the General Plan
Amendment requested by the Warmington Group. If the project appeals to you, please find another parcel
where it won’t impact the quality of life of people who have chosen their homes for that very blessing, as
well as create safety hazards in a very congested part of the city.
Thank you,
Charity Katz
210
From:Stephanie Barton
To:Planning
Subject:Proposed Home Building
Date:Monday, September 14, 2020 4:37:07 PM
Good Afternoon
I am writing you in support of the proposed home development located at Beltramo Road and Moorpark Ave. I
have lived in Moorpark for over 10 years and love our little community. However, I am trying to move my parents
here and am having a hard time finding affordable housing for them. They would love to come to Moorpark to be
near their grandkids. That way , they can be with them during school day so I can work effectively. We love the
family oriented community we live in but it is really lacking affordable housing that would ensure our community
stays in tact.
We really are lacking New, updated, safe housing that would hugely benefit our community and all future residents.
I am in total favor of this project and only see good things to come from it.
Thank You
Stephanie Barton
211
From:Laura Hansen
To:Planning
Subject:General Plan Amendment Application for Proposed Beltramo Ranch Community
Date:Monday, September 14, 2020 6:51:15 PM
Honorable Councilmembers Roseann Mikos and David Pollack:
I am writing to request that the planning commission deny the rezoning request
from Warmington homes.
This development does not fit with the neighborhoods in this semi-rural area. The
zoning should remain the same to preserve the rural nature of the neighborhood. A
low-density ranchette development would allow the applicant to proceed forward
while allowing the current neighborhood to remain the quiet and rural area that it
has always been.
I am concerned about the traffic and parking impact on the Heatherglen
neighborhood. Three- and four-bedroom homes will have more than 2 cars per
home, without accommodating for visitors. This will cause parking problems in a
neighborhood that already has very little parking.
I am also concerned that the city/county/DOT, etc. will eventually require a second
exit out of the neighborhood and it will be right through the park to Harvester,
increasing traffic in front of a park where toddlers play.
And, I am concerned about the traffic impact on the 118. The single entrance will
cause back-ups entering and exiting the neighborhood.
Please do not allow a zoning change. Instead, require the applicant to conform to
the current zoning. A beautiful neighborhood could be developed within the current
zoning.
Please keep
Thank you for your consideration.
Laura Hansen
--
Laura Hansen
212
From:Reggie Mercado
To:Planning
Subject:Beltramo Ranch Project
Date:Monday, September 14, 2020 8:15:29 PM
Dear City Council,
I’m writing in support of the proposed development on LA Ave and Beltramo Rd.
As a member of the community for 17 years and having worked at the site for 12 years, I’m intimately aware of the
need for a quality development on the property.
I watch all day as cats speed down Beltramo Ranch, kicking up dust and driving dangerously presenting a
potentially tragic accident as children are often on our church property and in the general vicinity.
As a father to 2 young adults in their 20’s, a project like this presents an opportunity for young people like them to
live in the city they grew up in whereas currently there is little opportunity to do so.
As a pastor watching droves from my congregation leave California because of the social climate and economic
difficulty to liv the American Dream in SoCal, a project like this makes that dream more affordable and realistic.
We need a project like this in our city to continue to be a place where young families can enjoy the blessing of what
Moorpark offers even as my family benefited from it.
Sincerely,
Reggie Mercado
Sr. Leader
The Fountain
Moorpark, CA.
213
From:Nick Campbell
To:Planning
Subject:Re: General Plan Amendment Pre-Screening for Proposed Beltramo Ranch Community
Date:Monday, September 14, 2020 8:21:29 PM
September 14th, 2020
Moorpark Community & Economic Development Standing Committee
Councilmember Mikos and Councilmember Pollock
799 Moorpark Avenue
Moorpark, CA 93021
Re: General Plan Amendment Pre-Screening for Proposed Beltramo
Ranch Community
Honorable Councilmembers Mikos and Pollock:
As a Moorpark resident I want to express my support for the proposed Beltramo
Ranch community. The proposed community offers the City of Moorpark several
economic benefits which are much needed in our city including:
1.Entry level for-sale housing.
2. Increased property and sales tax.
3. Shoppers/diners to support our stores and restaurants along Los Angeles Avenue.
4. A significant portion (15%) of the homes will be made available
to affordable for-sale buyers.
Again as a long time Moorpark resident I believe that the proposed development is
the right solution for the area and fits well with the adjacent uses. t is for these
important reasons I support the redevelopment of property into the proposed
Beltramo Ranch community.
Sincerely,
Nicholas Campbell PA-C
Orthopedic Physician Assistant
Ventura Orthopedics - Oxnard/Ventura
214
From:Hannah George
To:Planning
Subject:Beltramo Ranch
Date:Monday, September 14, 2020 8:38:07 PM
To Whom it May Concern,
My name is Hannah George - I live with my family in the Peach Hill area, and I have become
aware from the community of a new proposed development called the Beltramo Ranch off of
LA Ave. We are in favor and are hoping to see more housing develop in our city to help
mitigate the rising housing prices and allow more room for the city to grow.
Just wanted to send a quick note voicing our opinion.
Kind Regards,
Hannah
215
From:Cheryl McEwan
To:Planning
Subject:Beltramo Ranch Project
Date:Monday, September 14, 2020 8:41:56 PM
Hello Planning Committee,
I would like to express my interest in this project as I think it will be good for Moorpark.
Warmington has proposed a nicely designed project, consistent with the area and
neighborhood. People need housing, especially the proposed entry level housing in this
community. The proposed project makes sense in this location and should be approved to
move forward with an entitlement application.
I appreciate the updates that Warmington is implementing in the Plan changes and look
forward to seeing the finished Project.
Thank you for your time,
Cheryl McEwan
216
From:Jeff Mayeda
To:Planning
Subject:Re: General Plan Amendment Application for Proposed Beltramo Ranch Community
Date:Monday, September 14, 2020 9:06:07 PM
September 14, 2020
To: Moorpark Community & Economic Development Standing Committee
Councilmembers Roseann Mikos and David Pollack (cc: Mayor Janice Parvin, Councilmembers
Ken Simons
and Chris Enegren)
Re: General Plan Amendment Application for Proposed Beltramo Ranch Community
Honorable Councilmembers Roseann Mikos and David Pollack:
As 30+ year residents of Moorpark, we have seen many changes to our little town. Some good,
some not good. The proposed Beltramo Ranch development on Los Angeles Avenue, adjacent to
Heather Glen (our tract) and the communities on Maureen Lane and Loretta Drive, if allowed,
would fall into the latter category. Although Warmington Group makes grand claims regarding
some minor changes they’ve made to their original plan, they have failed to address serious
issues which are causing us and many others the most concern. These concerns include the
following:
1.Beltramo Ranch doesn’t blend into the character of the surrounding neighborhoods. The
proposed homes appear squeezed onto lots barely bigger than the structure. Some homes
only have a backyard 5 feet deep! When we moved to Moorpark, this wasn’t how we
pictured homes here. If we had wanted this, we would have moved elsewhere. If you take
a drive through the surrounding neighborhoods, they feel roomy with adequate space
between neighboring properties. Beltramo would be the exact opposite.
2.Proposed parking within the development is still inadequate. Each Beltramo single-family
home only has one driveway space allowing for only three vehicle spaces per home.
Duplex homes have no driveway space so only 2 vehicles can be accommodated. In a
perfect world, this might be barely adequate but in today’s world, we all know that garage
space is often used as additional storage space for last year’s holiday decorations and
rarely used camping equipment thereby relegating vehicles outdoors. Also, today’s family
unit which often includes young adults includes additional vehicles which would need
additional parking space. These scenarios would mean that the so-called ‘guest parking’
would be quickly used up by their residents since there is no provision for street parking
within the development. For the surrounding neighborhoods of Heather Glen, Maureen
Lane & Loretta Drive, we can envision those areas being targeted for ‘overflow’ parking on
a regular basis.
3.Only a single entry/exit from this proposed development onto Highway 118. Not only would
Beltramo add to the congestion on 118, which is already a nightmare, but it’s proximity to
the Tierra Rejada intersection and the Warmington’s proposal to allow exits west onto 118
is just asking for problems. Should an accident occur at their entrance/exit, it would
certainly block anyone, including first responders, from entering or exiting Beltramo until it is
cleared up and would bring traffic to a standstill on all of the city’s major arteries as drivers
217
look for ways around the congestion. Even today, we have a hard enough time turning out
onto Tierra Rejada due to the increase in traffic. Beltramo will only make things worse as
neither 118 or Tierra Rejada can smoothly accommodate the added traffic.
4.The light and noise pollution from the development for the immediate neighbors. As
residents of Heather Glen, we can certainly foresee problems with street lights glaring into
the bedrooms of the homes on Elderberry Avenue and Maureen Lane along with sounds of
cars driving mere feet behind their homes at all hours of the day. Not to mention the noise
and pollution from the construction process itself.
5.Lastly, the potential increase in crime. Speaking of vehicles mere feet adjacent to some of
the homes, the proposed ‘guest’ parking, which would certainly be almost always full, would
be an inviting target for break-in’s and who wants that activity right behind you and your
children’s bedrooms. And what would prevent them from hopping the fence into your
property?
There are other objections that we and others have to this development, but almost all these
objections relate to trying to preserve the quality of life that we enjoy in our little slice of Moorpark.
We moved here for the serene and semi-rural nature of Heather Glen at the outside edge of
Moorpark. And we want our neighbors on Maureen Lane and Loretta Drive to be able to keep the
unique, old Moorpark ambiance they enjoy as well. Allowing this development to proceed will
significantly change both our worlds.
As long time citizens of Moorpark who love this community and especially cherish the ambiance
and character of the neighborhood we live in here, we urge the Committee and the Council to not
approve the General Plan Amendment requested by the Warmington Group. If the project appeals
to you, please find another parcel where it won’t impact the quality of life of people who have
chosen their homes for that very blessing.
Thank you,
Jeff & Sui-Yuk Mayeda
Sent from Mail for Windows 10
218
From:Prince Bhebe
To:Planning
Subject:Support for Warmington residential project
Date:Monday, September 14, 2020 9:50:21 PM
We’d like to register our support for the Warmington housing project.
#1: SIGNIFICANT PROJECT PLAN CHANGES
Warmington listened to the community and CEDC council members at the 6.24.2020 meeting. Several community
meetings were held to discuss the proposed project and to understand the concerns of the neighbors. Significant site
plan changes included the following:
• Changed Product Type from Townhome Buildings to SFD & Duplexes
• Reduced Density from 13.8 DU/AC with 102 units versus to 9.3 DU/AC with 69 units
(over 30% less)
• Added ample guest parking (even though not required by code)
• Increased setbacks on sides with homes
• Added higher property line walls and landscape screening
• Provided a large community green space and access to the Arroyo through property
#2: CONSISTENCY WITH CURRENT GENERAL PLAN
The revised plan is consistent with the City’s General Plan Land Use Element Goals & Policies, per highlights
below:
General Plan Land Use Element (LUE) Goal #5: Develop new residential housing which is compatible with the
character of existing individual neighborhoods and minimizes land use incompatibility. GP LUE Policy 5.2: Infill
development in existing residential neighborhoods shall be compatible with the scale and character of the
surrounding neighborhood.
Proposed Beltramo Ranch project is appropriately located adjacent to a major transportation corridor (SR 118),
walking distance from commercial shopping and retail areas, and across the street from existing light industrial
warehouses. Immediately adjacent land uses are a mixture of single-family and duplex homes.
GP LUE Policy 5.3 states, “Landscaped and/or natural vegetation buffer areas shall be provid- ed around and within
residential projects to minimize land use conflicts and privacy impacts.”
Project design minimizes impacts to adjacent properties by exceeding setbacks as stat- ed in the development code,
providing screening through use of higher walls and landscaping, limiting the building height to two-stories for
homes , and orienting win- dows appropriately in order to maintain privacy to adjacent homes.
#3: STATE MANDATE/HOUSING CYCLE
The Governor signed a bill earlier this year (SB330) to implement steps to alleviate the Statewide housing crisis
(Housing Crisis Act of 2019). There is an extreme housing shortage throughout the state and every city is required
by law to add housing stock within their respective city.
The current adopted City Housing Element includes the housing cycle from 2014-2021. Moorpark was required to
build 1,164 housing units, of which approximately half have been built to date. The next housing cycle is underway
and will cover the period 2021-2029 (to be adopted in Oct. 2020). The City of Moorpark was must provide 1,288
units for this next cycle, plus make up for deficiencies from the prior cycle.
Bottom line is that the City of Moorpark must come up with creative ways to meet the large housing demands and
mandates. This includes upzoning, rezoning, increased allowable densities, redevelopment, and the like.
Thanks,
Prince and Fisayo Bhebe
219
From:joshua lambeth
To:Planning
Subject:Beltramo Ranch Project
Date:Monday, September 14, 2020 9:57:21 PM
Hello
It has come to my attention that on Wednesday September 16 the Moorpark city council will
be holding a public hearing regarding the Beltramo Ranch Project. As a resident of Moorpark
for 8 years I would like to state my approval for this project. I believe that it will help beautify
LA avenue and create more places to live without overcrowding the area. Several spots on
LA Avenue are undeveloped and the Beltramo Ranch project would enhance the avenue.
Please vote yes for this project to proceed.
Thank You
Josh Lambeth
Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android
220
From:mgomulasawa7@gmail.com
To:Planning
Subject:Beltramo Ranch
Date:Monday, September 14, 2020 10:06:28 PM
To Whom It May Concerned
It is my understand that the City Planning Department will be Meeting to discuss/vote on this project tomorrow.
Sorry, for the late email.
In a nutshell; The 69 home Beltramo Ranch project as designed is 9.3 units per acre. If this project density is not
approved now, then a much higher density project will be allowed (without a General Plan Amendment or Zone
Change) in a couple years after the GP is updated. The GP update will likely designate these same parcels for at
least 2 x that amount or 20 units to the acre minimum; maybe up to 30 or 35.
Warmington has proposed a nicely designed project, consistent with the area and neighborhood. People need
housing, especially the proposed entry level housing in this community. The proposed project makes sense in this
location and should be approved to move forward with an entitlement application.
Mary Sawa
Moorpark Resident who is in favor of this project
Sent from my iPhone
221
From:
To:Planning
Subject:Sale of Fountain Church property
Date:Monday, September 14, 2020 10:25:51 PM
Sept. 14, 2020
Subject: Sale of the property currently occupied by The Fountain Church
To Whom It May Concern:
This is to encourage a favorable decision concerning the sale of the Fountain Church property on Los
Angeles Ave. in Moorpark.
The plans are favorable for the community of Moorpark and only advantageous for the welfare of the
community.
Please note the following bullet points that are planned:
• Changed Product Type from Townhome Buildings to SFD & Duplexes
• Reduced Density from 13.8 DU/AC with 102 units versus to 9.3 DU/AC with 69 units
(over 30% less)
• Added ample guest parking (even though not required by code)
• Increased setbacks on sides with homes
• Added higher property line walls and landscape screening
• Provided a large community green space and access to the Arroyo through property
Thank you.
Myrene Glass
222
223
From:Jennah Morgan
To:Planning
Subject:Support Beltramo Ranch Community
Date:Tuesday, September 15, 2020 6:27:46 AM
As a Moorpark resident I want to express my support for the proposed Beltramo
Ranch community. The proposed community offers the City of Moorpark many
economic benefits much needed in the city including: entry level for-sale
housing, increased property and sales tax, and shoppers/diners to support
our stores and restaurants along Los Angeles Avenue. Additionally, 15% of the
homes will be made available to affordable for-sale buyers. This proposed
development is the right solution for the area and fits well with the adjacent uses.
In addition I personally owned ranch property in Moorpark for almost 8 years. I’m very
familiar with horses, arenas and farm type animals.
While I understand the neighbors not wanting development to take place on this land, and I
love the fact that they are grandfathered in to specific zones to have farm animals, The
area and location of this land really calls for something more.
The area is not rural Moorpark and practically speaking, the value development would bring
to the city out weighs the few houses that prefer to retain the rural feel.
I sympathize with your decision as it’s not an easy one. It’s definitely not a position
where you can please and satisfy all involved.
I would just ask you to consider the decision that is best for the city now and for the future.
Out of all the spots in Moorpark that more housing is proposed or wanting to be built.. this
land is the BEST area for that.
For all of these reasons I support the redevelopment of property into the proposed
Beltramo Ranch community
224
From:Chris Aitkens
To:Planning
Cc:Sara Aitkens
Subject:Beltramo Ranch Development
Date:Tuesday, September 15, 2020 6:55:46 AM
Date: September 14, 2020
To: Moorpark Community & Economic Development Standing Committee Councilmembers
Roseann Mikos and David Pollack
Cc: Mayor Janice Parvin, Councilmembers Ken Simons and Chris Enegren
Re. General Plan Amendment Application for Proposed Beltramo Ranch Community
Dear Councilmembers Roseann Mikos and David Pollack:
My wife and I wish to express our concerns about the proposed Beltramo Ranch development on
Los Angeles Avenue, which is adjacent to our HOA, Heather Glen. The Warmington Group has
made some changes to the original plan, but we feel they are insufficient to satisfactorily address
the issues that are causing our family, and many others in the community the utmost concern.
These concerns are as follows:
1. A development of this density does not blend into either community’s character.
2. Parking is still an issue - despite the additional spaces that have appeared on the latest plan.
Of particular concern for the folks who live on Elderberry is the addition of 7 more
spaces against the perimeter wall since the last plan we were shown and the apparent
removal of the promised green belt landscaping to accommodate these new spaces.
The additional noise and light pollution right outside bedroom windows is also a
concern.
In addition, there is no street parking and only 2-3 spaces per unit, which makes
overflow parking in Heather Glen a very real concern.
3. Increased chances of traffic collisions associated with the single ingress from/egress to Hwy
#118; especially where the middle lane is being used for left hand turns.
4. Backup traffic for left hand turns onto Tierra Rejada from the 118 highway.
5. Increased congestion on LA Avenue (118), which is already a huge headache during rush
hours and promises to become even more congested once the other approved developments on
LA Avenue are completed.
There are other objections that I and others have to this development, but almost all these
objections relate to trying to preserve the quality of life that we enjoy in our area of Moorpark. We
moved here for the serene and semi-rural nature of Heather Glen at the outside edge of
Moorpark, and we want our neighbors on Maureen Lane and Loretta Drive to be able to keep the
unique ambiance they enjoy as well. Allowing this development to proceed will significantly
225
226
From:Debby
To:Planning
Subject:The Fountain Church Property
Date:Tuesday, September 15, 2020 7:43:44 AM
To Whom it May Concern:
As a long time member of The Fountain I want to submit to you that my husband (Tim) and I are in complete
support of the sale of our current property on LA Ave. in Moorpark. Please consider approving the sale of the
property as this is in the best interest of the church and all parties involved.
Sincerely,
Debby Evrist
Sent from my iPhone
227
From:Martha Brantley
To:Planning
Subject:Support for the Proposed Beltramo Ranch Project
Date:Tuesday, September 15, 2020 8:24:34 AM
I would like to thank you for this opportunity to address the City of Moorpark City Council to
express my support for the approval of the Proposed Beltramo Ranch Project.
I believe that Beltramo Ranch will provide the City of Moorpark with new, much needed
residual housing that is not only compatible with the continuing growth and development of
the City of Moorpark but the design plans blend visually with nearby neighborhoods and
recently developed residential housing and commercial properties along the shared Moorpark
corridor. I also believe that The Beltramo Ranch Project will aid the City of Moorpark in
meeting current growth demands for housing as well as the need for compliance with recent
State mandates for housing development..
Please accept my full endorsement and support for the approval of the Beltramo Ranch
Project.
Sincerely,
Martha S. Brantley
228
229
From:Norma Letinsky
To:Planning
Subject:Support for Beltramo Ranch project
Date:Tuesday, September 15, 2020 9:48:02 AM
To whom it may concern:
I am writing to voice my strong support for the Beltramo Ranch project proposed by
Warmington Homes. There seems to be no valid reason for turning down this project other
than the complaints of disgruntled "not in my backyard" neighbors. This project will be an
improvement to the city of Moorpark in many ways and should receive your full support.
Warmington has listened to the neighbors' concerns and made appropriate changes to their
original plan. For example, they have changed from townhomes to single family dwellings and
duplexes, reduced the density by over 30%, added guest parking, increased setbacks on the
sides with adjacent houses, added higher property line walls and landscape screening, and
provided a large community green space and access to the Arroyo. All these will greatly
enhance this property, which is currently a bit of an eyesore--as well as providing much-
needed additional housing for the city (and thus increasing tax revenue).
Furthermore, the Warmington revised plan is completely consistent with the Moorpark
General Plan's goals and policies. Its location is ideal, the design is well thought out, and will
be a welcome addition to the city of Moorpark.
Sincerely,
Norma Letinsky
Moorpark College Professor Emeritus
230
From:Joy Tangarone
To:Planning
Subject:Please approve Beltramo Ranch
Date:Tuesday, September 15, 2020 9:48:49 AM
Dear City Council,
I would like to add my voice in support of the Beltramo Ranch development. This
housing project is well suited for Moorpark
and the community. The proposed plan is a good size and the density is perfect for the current
neighborhood.
Warmington has proposed a nicely designed project, consistent with the area and
neighborhood. People need housing, especially the proposed entry level housing in
this community. The proposed project makes sense in this location and should be
approved to move forward with an entitlement application.
Sincerely,
Joy Boothe
231
September 15, 2020
To: Planning Center & City Council, Moorpark
RE: Sale & Development of The Fountain Foursquare Church Property
11930 W Los Angeles Ave, Moorpark
To Whom it may concern,
I wanted my opinion to be considered during this process…
I have been present & observed Warmington presenting development plans & interacting with the
community in this immediate area concerning the development of this property. This company has
been very open to receive arguments from both sides, react to concerns, and change development plans
to accommodate the concerns, needs, & desires of the community to help make this transition &
development agreeable to both parties involved. They seem to genuinely care about the neighbors in
this community & welcome the opportunity to be a part of its growth.
Thank you,
Patty McElvy
Office Manager & Director of Church Operations
The Fountain Foursquare Church
232
From:Mary Mercado
To:Planning
Subject:BELTRAMO RANCH PROJECT
Date:Tuesday, September 15, 2020 10:17:44 AM
I want to first thank you for all you do for the City of Moorpark. I know you all do not have an easy
job. But thank you for loving our community and helping to grow our beautiful community.
I want to express my support for the Betramo Ranch Project. I have lived in Moorpark for 17 years.
My husband and I have raised our 3 boys here in Moorpark and we are pastors of The Fountain
Foursquare Church where this project is located. We love Moorpark. It is a fabulous community to
raise a family. As a member of the community, I have noticed that young families are moving, not
only out of Moorpark but out of state due to the high cost of real estate. I believe this project is
wonderful for our community since the homes that are being built are more affordable for young
families. We want to draw people into Moorpark not make it unaffordable to live in this great
community. We want our children to raise their families here. The builders have done a great job
with the plans for this project. I feel they have taken into consideration the neighbors suggestions
and made it work for the neighborhood . I believe this project will only add value to the city of
Moorpark.
Thank you for your time.
Thank you,
Mary Mercado
233
From:Karen Evans
To:Planning
Subject:Housing project on L.A Ave.
Date:Tuesday, September 15, 2020 10:44:32 AM
Dear City Council,
I am sending this letter to urge you to approve the Warmington project on L.A. Ave. The developer has listened to
concerns and made adjustments to nicely fit the needs of our city. We are in great need of more housing in
Moorpark and I think this is a great location and a wonderful planned community. It will be a great addition to our
city.
I urge you to approve their plans and support this project.
Karen Evans
Moorpark resident
Sent from my iPad
234
From:Reggie Mercado
To:Planning
Subject:Beltramo Ranch Project
Date:Tuesday, September 15, 2020 11:10:58 AM
I urge the City of Moorpark to approve this project. It will provide much needed housing and
tax revenue for the City of Moorpark.
235
From:larry lafata
To:Planning
Subject:Warmington 69 unit project
Date:Tuesday, September 15, 2020 12:11:52 PM
To whom it may concern:
I am in favor of the new 69 unit housing project in Moorpark, to be built by Warmington
Homes.
The project is good for our community, bringing growth and support for our local businesses
and community.
It also helps with the housing shortages in So. California.
Warmington is a high quality builder and will do an excellent job in the building of this
project.
I urge you to vote in favor to complete this new housing community.
Thanks
Larry LaFata
40 year Moorpark resident
Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone
236
From:Michael Letinsky
To:Planning
Subject:Support for Beltramo Ranch project
Date:Tuesday, September 15, 2020 12:16:03 PM
Hello,
The email is to express my strong support for the Beltramo Ranch project proposed by
Warmington Homes.
Warmington has had discussions with the neighbors and listened to their concerns. In
response to these discussions Warmington has made appropriate changes to their original plan.
Their revised plan is completely consistent with the Moorpark General Plan's goals and
policies. Its location is ideal, the design is well thought out, and will be a welcome addition to
the city of Moorpark.
In summary, Warmington's modifications include: changing from building townhouses to
single family dwellings and duplexes, reducing the density by over 30%, increased setbacks
on the sides with adjacent houses, and added guest parking. They also include additional
landscape screening, higher property line walls and plans to create a large community green
space and access to the Arroyo. These changes will greatly enhance this property, which is
currently a bit of an eyesore. Most importantly, this project will provide much-needed
additional housing for the city (and thus increasing tax revenue).
I fully support the approval and completion of the Warmington project. I see no reason for
turning down this project other than the complaints of disgruntled "not in my backyard"
neighbors. This project will be an improvement to the city of Moorpark in many ways and
should receive your full support.
Sincerely,
Michael Letinsky
UCLA Professor Emeritus
--
Sent from Postbox
237
Sincerely,
Kim Cook
From:Kimmi Cook
To:Planning
Subject:Development project for 11930 W. Los Angeles Ave
Date:Tuesday, September 15, 2020 12:32:53 PM
To whom it may concern,
I am in support of the development project for the land that is currently occupied by The
Fountain Church.
I believe the developer has met with the neighbors and has altered the plan to address their
concerns.
The City of Moorpark needs new housing and this development will provide that.
The revised plan is consistent with the City’s General Plan.
There is an extreme housing shortage throughout the state and every city is required by law to
add housing stock within their respective city.
Warmington has proposed a nicely designed project, consistent with the area and
neighborhood. People need housing, especially the proposed entry level housing in this
community.
The proposed project makes sense in this location and should be approved to move forward
with an entitlement application.
238
From:Mark Ritchie
To:Planning
Subject:Rezoning of Beltramo Ranch Rd
Date:Tuesday, September 15, 2020 1:31:22 PM
I am against rezoning the development behind Maureen Lane. Allowing a rezoning will negatively impact the life
style we sought and have created here There are too many negatives impact, (traffic/parking, etc) and I cannot see
one positive benefit by allowing a rezoning. Keep it low density residential.
Mark Ritchie
Sent from my iPhone
239
From:Rob Lemons
To:Planning
Subject:BELTRAMO RANCH DEVELOPMENT
Date:Tuesday, September 15, 2020 1:50:59 PM
Dear City Council Members,
As a businessman in Moorpark and having lived and coached in the community for over a
decade, I understand the needs families face economically and the impact the cost of living in
Ventura County/Southern California has on families. We need more economically feasible
housing in Moorpark. This development provides housing to a certain demographic in our
community that would allow families to remain in our city as opposed to finding housing
opportunities out of state as so many are currently doing.
From my understanding, Warmington Builders has accommodated every request from the
surrounding neighborhood, even reducing the number of units originally proposed for the site.
Their proposal is an upgrade over the dirt road, weed fields, and current structures along
Beltramo Rd.
Please favorably consider this important proposal for our city and community members.
Kindly,
Rob Lemons
Owner/Project Manager
SBR Signs ● INKWERKS
Up In Stitches ● Hoops Embroidery
Signs, Screen Printing & Embroidery
"Serving All of Ventura County & Beyond"
240
From:Lee, Heather
To:Planning
Subject:CONCERNS REGARDING BELTRAMO RANCH DEVELOPMENT
Date:Tuesday, September 15, 2020 1:56:25 PM
To: Moorpark Community & Economic Development Standing Committee
Councilmembers Roseann Mikos and David Pollack (cc: Mayor Janice Parvin, Councilmembers
Ken Simons and Chris Enegren)
Re. General Plan Amendment Application for Proposed Beltramo Ranch Community
Honorable Councilmembers Roseann Mikos and DavidPollack:
I wish to express my concerns about the proposed Beltramo Ranch development on Los Angeles
Avenue, which is adjacent to my HOA, Heather Glen, and the communities on Maureen Lane and
Loretta Drive. Granted, the Warmington Group have made some changes to the original plan, but
they are insufficient to satisfactorily address the issues that are causing me and many others the
most concern. These concerns include the following:
A development of this density doesn’t blend into either community’s character
Parking, still, despite the additional spaces that have appeared on the latest plan. Of particular
concern for the folks who live on Elderberry is the addition of 7 more spaces against the perimeter
wall since the last plan we were shown and the apparent removal of promised green belt
landscaping to accommodate these new spaces. The additional noise and light pollution right
outside bedroom windows is also a concern. Plus, there’s no street parking and only 2-3 spaces
per unit, so overflow parking in Heather Glen remains a very real concern.
Increased chances of collisions associated with the single ingress from/egress to Hwy #118 ,
especially where the middle lane is being used for left hand turns.
Backup traffic for left hand turns onto Tierra Rejada from the #118.
Increased congestion on LA Avenue, which is already a huge headache during rush hours and
promises to become a real nightmare once the other approved developments on LA Avenue are
completed.
There are other objections that I and others have to this development, but almost all these
objections relate to trying to preserve the quality of life that we enjoy in our little slice of Moorpark.
We moved here for the serene and semi-rural nature of Heather Glen at the outside edge of
Moorpark. And, we want our neighbors on Maureen Lane and Loretta Drive to be able to keep the
unique, old Moorpark ambiance they enjoy as well. Allowing this development to proceed will
significantly change both our worlds.
As a citizen of Moorpark who loves this community and especially cherishes the ambiance and
character of the neighborhood I live in here, I urge the Committee and the Council to not approve
the General Plan Amendment requested by the Warmington Group. If the project appeals to you,
please find another parcel where it won’t impact the quality of life of people who have chosen their
homes for that very blessing.
Thank you,
Heather Lee
241
From:Ryan Carr
To:Planning
Subject:Re. General Plan Amendment Application for Proposed Beltramo Ranch Community
Date:Tuesday, September 15, 2020 2:22:41 PM
Honorable Councilmembers Roseann Mikos and DavidPollack:
I wish to express my concerns about the proposed Beltramo Ranch development on Los Angeles
Avenue, which is adjacent to my HOA, Heather Glen, and the communities on Maureen Lane and
Loretta Drive. Granted, the Warmington Group have made some changes to the original plan, but
they are insufficient to satisfactorily address the issues that are causing me and many others the
most concern. These concerns include the following:
1. A development of this density doesn’t blend into either community’s character
2. Parking, still, despite the additional spaces that have appeared on the latest plan. Of
particular concern for the folks who live on Elderberry is the addition of 7 more spaces
against the perimeter wall since the last plan we were shown and the apparent removal of
promised green belt landscaping to accommodate these new spaces. The additional noise
and light pollution right outside bedroom windows is also a concern. Plus, there’s no street
parking and only 2-3 spaces per unit, so overflow parking in Heather Glen remains a very
real concern.
3. Increased chances of collisions associated with the single ingress from/egress to Hwy #118
, especially where the middle lane is being used for left hand turns.
4. Backup traffic for left hand turns onto Tierra Rejada from the #118.
5. Increased congestion on LA Avenue, which is already a huge headache during rush hours
and promises to become a real nightmare once the other approved developments on LA
Avenue are completed.
There are other objections that I and others have to this development, but almost all these
objections relate to trying to preserve the quality of life that we enjoy in our little slice of Moorpark.
We moved here for the serene and semi-rural nature of Heather Glen at the outside edge of
Moorpark. And, we want our neighbors on Maureen Lane and Loretta Drive to be able to keep the
unique, old Moorpark ambiance they enjoy as well. Allowing this development to proceed will
significantly change both our worlds.
As a citizen of Moorpark who loves this community and especially cherishes the ambiance and
character of the neighborhood I live in here, I urge the Committee and the Council to not approve
the General Plan Amendment requested by the Warmington Group. If the project appeals to you,
please find another parcel where it won’t impact the quality of life of people who have chosen their
homes for that very blessing.
Thank you,
242
Ryan Carr
243
From:Angela Jones
To:Planning
Subject:Beltramo Ranch
Date:Tuesday, September 15, 2020 2:43:24 PM
Hello,
I am writing in favor of the Beltramo Ranch housing project to provide entry level housing in
this community. Currently, there are less homes in the market than buyers. It would be great to
have additional entry level homes in the market that is consistent with neighborhood and
Moorpark area.
Thank you,
Angela Jones
Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone
244
From:Joseph Kastelic
To:Planning
Subject:General Plan Amendment Application for Proposed Beltramo Ranch Community
Date:Tuesday, September 15, 2020 3:01:22 PM
To: Moorpark Community & Economic Development Standing Committee
Councilmembers Roseann Mikos and David Pollack (cc: Mayor Janice Parvin, Councilmembers Ken Simons and
Chris Enegren)
Honorable Councilmembers Roseann Mikos and DavidPollack:
I wish to express my concerns about the proposed Beltramo Ranch development on Los Angeles Avenue, which is
adjacent to my HOA, Heather Glen, and the communities on Maureen Lane and Loretta Drive. Granted, the
Warmington Group have made some changes to the original plan, but they are insufficient to satisfactorily address
the issues that are causing me and many others the most concern. These concerns include the following:
A development of this density doesn’t blend into either community’s character
Parking, still, despite the additional spaces that have appeared on the latest plan. Of particular concern for the folks
who live on Elderberry is the addition of 7 more spaces against the perimeter wall since the last plan we were shown
and the apparent removal of promised green belt landscaping to accommodate these new spaces. The additional
noise and light pollution right outside bedroom windows is also a concern. Plus, there’s no street parking and only
2-3 spaces per unit, so overflow parking in Heather Glen remains a very real concern.
Increased chances of collisions associated with the single ingress from/egress to Hwy #118 , especially where the
middle lane is being used for left hand turns.
Backup traffic for left hand turns onto Tierra Rejada from the #118.
Increased congestion on LA Avenue, which is already a huge headache during rush hours and promises to become a
real nightmare once the other approved developments on LA Avenue are completed.
There are other objections that I and others have to this development, but almost all these objections relate to
tryingJoseph Kasteli to preserve the quality of life that we enjoy in our little slice of Moorpark. We moved here for
the serene and semi-rural nature of Heather Glen at the outside edge of Moorpark. And, we want our neighbors on
Maureen Lane and Loretta Drive to be able to keep the unique, old Moorpark ambiance they enjoy as well.
Allowing this development to proceed will significantly change both our worlds.
As a citizen of Moorpark who loves this community and especially cherishes the ambiance and character of the
neighborhood I live in here, I urge the Committee and the Council to not approve the General Plan Amendment
requested by the Warmington Group. If the project appeals to you, please find another parcel where it won’t impact
the quality of life of people who have chosen their homes for that very blessing.
Thank you,
Joseph Kastelic
245
From:Frank Lagattuta
To:Planning
Subject:CONCERNS REGARDING BELTRAMO RANCH DEVELOPMENT
Date:Tuesday, September 15, 2020 3:34:02 PM
To: Moorpark Community & Economic Development Standing Committee
Councilmembers Roseann Mikos and David Pollack (cc: Mayor Janice Parvin, Councilmembers
Ken Simons and Chris Enegren)
Re. General Plan Amendment Application for Proposed Beltramo Ranch Community
Honorable Councilmembers Roseann Mikos and DavidPollack:
I wish to express my concerns about the proposed Beltramo Ranch development on Los Angeles
Avenue, which is adjacent to my HOA, Heather Glen, and the communities on Maureen Lane and
Loretta Drive. Granted, the Warmington Group have made some changes to the original plan, but
they are insufficient to satisfactorily address the issues that are causing me and many others the
most concern. These concerns include the following:
1. A development of this density doesn’t blend into either community’s character
2. Parking, still, despite the additional spaces that have appeared on the latest plan. Of
particular concern for the folks who live on Elderberry is the addition of 7 more spaces
against the perimeter wall since the last plan we were shown and the apparent removal of
promised green belt landscaping to accommodate these new spaces. The additional noise
and light pollution right outside bedroom windows is also a concern. Plus, there’s no street
parking and only 2-3 spaces per unit, so overflow parking in Heather Glen remains a very
real concern.
3. Increased chances of collisions associated with the single ingress from/egress to Hwy #118
, especially where the middle lane is being used for left hand turns.
4. Backup traffic for left hand turns onto Tierra Rejada from the #118.
5. Increased congestion on LA Avenue, which is already a huge headache during rush hours
and promises to become a real nightmare once the other approved developments on LA
Avenue are completed.
There are other objections that I and others have to this development, but almost all these
objections relate to trying to preserve the quality of life that we enjoy in our little slice of Moorpark.
We moved here for the serene and semi-rural nature of Heather Glen at the outside edge of
Moorpark. And, we want our neighbors on Maureen Lane and Loretta Drive to be able to keep the
unique, old Moorpark ambiance they enjoy as well. Allowing this development to proceed will
significantly change both our worlds.
As a citizen of Moorpark who loves this community and especially cherishes the ambiance and
character of the neighborhood I live in here, I urge the Committee and the Council to not approve
the General Plan Amendment requested by the Warmington Group. If the project appeals to you,
please find another parcel where it won’t impact the quality of life of people who have chosen their
246
247
From:PRIVATE
To:Shanna Farley-Judkins; Planning
Subject:General Plan Amendment Pre-Screening No. 2019-02
Date:Friday, September 11, 2020 4:30:31 PM
Dear Shanna,
You have not included a website to review any proposed site layout with buildings and I will not be
able to attend the meeting as I will be travelling. If possible I will attend via Zoom.
I believe a change to Very High density is NOT compatable with the surrounding neighborhood areas
and traffic. I often see kids playing in the street on Maureen, and adding 69 units of traffic to that
otherwise quiet neighborhood street makes no sense.
To enter the proposed development from the east, virtually ALL traffic will have to come through
Maureen. To exit the development and head west, virtually all traffic will drive through Maureen.
On trash day Maureen is congested with trash cans. Is the capacity of Maureen adequate for this
project?
Very High Density puts people on top of each other, and uncomfortably close to the homes on
Maureen and Elderberry. Some properties values on Maureen and Elderberry may be negatively
impacted by multi-story condos looking in their backyards.
Very High Density means there will likely be inadequate parking and no overflow place to park if the
streets are full. Correct density helps insure adequate light and air, reduces parking congestion
during fire and traffic hazards, and contributes to the creation of a pleasing neighborhood. A condo
project can have management challenges that cannot address urgent traffic and congestion issues
after hours and on weekends, and that further creates an uncomfortable neighborhood. A condo
project of this density would, in my opinion, create more permanent problems for the 69 families
that would live there than the city, or the residents anticipate, and once built, there really is no going
back.
I am not in favor of a density greater than that on Elderberry to the west (RPD-8.4U).
Best regards,
Philip Ochoa, Owner
248
From:Jennifer Lenaburg
To:Planning
Subject:General Plan Amendment Pre-Screening No. 2019-02 public hearing
Date:Monday, September 14, 2020 9:20:43 AM
To Community and Economic Development Standing Committee;
We strongly oppose the zoning change for the General Plan Amendment Pre-Screening No.
2019-02 from Low Density Residential to Very High Density Residential. The Southeast corner
of Los Angeles Avenue and Beltramo Road.
We feel that the small space does not support a 69unit high density condominium project. It
would destroy the little bit of rural atmosphere we have left in our neighborhood as the city
has grown up around us.
It would cause more traffic, privacy issues for the houses located on Maureen Lane as two
story condos would overlook right into the property, noise, etc.
Please do not approve this change.
The Padilla Household
249
From:Paul Farley
To:Planning; City Council & City Manager
Subject:Community and Economic Development Standing Committee : Beltramo Ranch Project (correction)
Date:Monday, September 14, 2020 10:41:07 AM
Honorable Council Members Roseann Mikos and David Pollack
I am writing this email to convey my concerns regarding the Beltramo Ranch project. Please hear
the tone of the existing neighborhoods on both sides of this proposal. Our neighbors in the Heather
Glen community as well as the residents of Maureen Lane and Loretta Drive are against any approval
for this project to move forward.
I feel that the developer does not understand the impact caused by their proposal.
Moorpark General Plan policy 4.2 clearly states: Existing neighborhoods shall be protected and
preserved in order to maintain their character and identity. Maureen Lane has been active in
protecting their rural character for many years. This proposal does not seem to share that design.
The developer’s latest plan took away 20- 25’ of setbacks from the eastern edge (Maureen Lane
side) of the project (see project matrix summary table 1). Yet they claim in their Quantitative design
findings that they increased setbacks on the east side. Not true. This does not sound anything like
they understand we are rural, have livestock and are zoned to have horses and farm animals. I
believe they did this to cram parking along the Heather Glen boundary which in itself lends to
additional problems. The streets on the plan are ridiculously narrow at 25’. The current street size
in Heather Glen is closer to 34 feet. Reminder the existing lots that border Maureen Lane are zoned
two /acre residential. For good reason.
Moorpark General Plan policy 5.2: Infill development in existing residential neighborhoods shall be
compatible with the scale and character of the surrounding neighborhood. Maureen Lane homes
that border the west boundary are ALL single-story homes. ALL of them. The Heather Glen
community is a mixture of single story and two-story homes. How does this infill appear at all
compatible?
This project takes some large residential parcels which border Maureen Lane and Loretta and try to
shoehorn in the density of one small parcel zoned high density next to Beltramo Rd and turn the
whole mess into a high density project that just doesn’t fit either existing neighborhood. The
developer is missing the mark.
I believe the developer is doing just enough to try and pacify the critics and I believe there are way
too many contingent items that the developer is ignoring for this project to be considered as
presented. Please hear the existing neighborhoods, those of us who live here, and vote against this
project as presented.
Please preserve the integrity of our rural neighborhood.
Thank You,
Paul Farley
Maureen Lane Moorpark
250
251
252
253
From:David McGarry
To:Planning
Subject:Beltramo Ranch development
Date:Monday, September 14, 2020 12:28:12 PM
Dear Planning Department,
I am writing to you today to express our continued opposition to the zoning change request for the
Beltramo Ranch project on Los Angeles Avenue.
I realize the Warmington group has tried to address concerns that have been raised by the
neighborhoods on either side of this proposed project. While I was somewhat happy to see a
willingness to work with our neighborhoods, they still wish to development a very high density
residential complex on a piece of property sandwiched in between to neighborhoods that are less
dense. The fact that the city is considering allowing the change is disheartening. For those of us that
border the subject project, we are very concerned, not to mention unhappy with how a
development of this density will affect our life. Loss of privacy, increased noise, lowering of our
property values, are concerns that we all share.
If Warmington is to develop this piece of property, we ask that the city hold fast on the General Plan
that has been in place for decades. There is no compelling reason to change the zoning of the
subject property, and therefore, respectfully, we ask that the change be denied.
Thank you,
254
255
the General Plan Amendment requested by the Warmington Group. If the project appeals to you,
please find another parcel where it won’t impact the quality of life of people who have chosen their
homes for that very blessing.
Thank you,
Mike & Olivia Whitelaw
256
From:Charity Katz
To:Planning
Subject:Regarding Warmington Development Plans
Date:Monday, September 14, 2020 3:49:11 PM
September 14, 2020
To: Moorpark Community & Economic Development Standing Committee Councilmembers Roseann
Mikos and David Pollack (cc: Mayor Janice Parvin, Councilmembers Ken Simons and Chris Enegren)
Re. General Plan Amendment Application for Proposed Beltramo Ranch Community
Honorable Councilmembers Roseann Mikos and David Pollack:
I wish to express my concerns about the proposed Beltramo Ranch development on Los Angeles
Avenue, which is adjacent to my HOA, Heather Glen, and the communities on Maureen Lane and Loretta
Drive. While the group has seemingly taken into account many of our concerns, I believe there are still
outstanding items that do not seem to have been addressed.
1. While I appreciate that some guest parking has been included, there are still far fewer guest spaces
than seem necessary. There are ONLY 14 spots for 47 homes. I contacted the group, and was informed
that there won't be parking in front of the houses. So while they will have driveways and garages, there
will not be enough parking for the cars and extra guests. I state this from experience. How many people
choose not to park in their garages as they use them for storage, gyms, extra living space, etc? Each
home has only one driveway space. When they have more cars than driveway space, where will they
park? The guest parking. Then, when those are full, where will they park? The Heather Glen
neighborhood, which is already very limited on street parking. This is an issue for those of us in Heather
Glen, especially with there being an open walkway straight from our neighborhood to this new
development.
I lived in a development that implemented parking restrictions to free up guest parking, which resulted in
the occupants parking in the adjacent neighborhood. It did not increase garage utilization.
My past experience shows that the overflow always goes to the adjoining neighborhoods. That will be
very problematic, and potentially costly to Heather Glen as we would likely have to enforce parking rules
in our HOA with some sort of permitting system and security to prevent people from parking from another
neighborhood. We should not have to take on that financially and physical responsibility.
A solution could be to increase guest parking, and update the design to allow for street parking in front of
the houses. Looking at the Moorpark page on the proposed development, their guest parking spots
actually decreased from their original design. That is very troubling.
2. With only one entrance and exit for the new development, the increased chances for an accident are
exponential. That stretch, in particular, is already dangerous, and increasing unprotected left turns,
especially during rush hours, has the potential to be catastrophic. With 47 homes of 3-4 bedrooms, it is
reasonable to expect a minimum of 100+ cars turning in and out of there multiple times per day. I would
imagine that is, in part, why that area has been designated as low density as it is just not safe. How will
this be resolved in the future? It seems the only way this may be resolved is by adding access through
either Heath Glen or Maureen/Loretta Drive, and neither of those is a reasonable solution as they will
increase traffic congestion and decrease the safety in neighborhoods that have very little traffic except for
those who live there.
3. Increased congestion on LA Avenue, which is already a huge headache during rush hours and
promises to become a real nightmare once the other approved developments on LA Avenue are
completed. Another development is NOT needed right off of LA Avenue. The city cannot handle it on its
main road where the majority of our commerce is. This will also force more people onto Poindexter and
257
Tierra Rejada, creating more disruption for those areas. In addition, Poindexter already experiences
concerns with accidents and people driving too fast - especially by the school. This will make that worse.
4. How will guaranteed access to the Arroyo be maintained? Right now the proposed green space being
added is where the pedestrian access to that area is, and while there is nothing stating they will limit it or
close it, we were told, they would explicitly add permanent access in writing to the plans, but I do not see
that. How will that be enforced once all the units are sold?
5. Overcrowding in schools is an issue already, and I do not see how adding hundreds of new homes
between this and other developments, with potentially thousands of new students (when there is more
than one child in the home) will work with the limited school slots currently available. We are introducing
more children than are graduating, and we are adding to that burden with these new developments while
cutting school funds and resources - e.g., our librarians for one.
There are other objections that I and others have to this development, but almost all these objections
relate to trying to preserve the quality of life that we enjoy in our little slice of Moorpark. I purchased my
home in Heather Glen because it was a quiet, family community. I want to keep it that way without feeling
like I am living in a congested city. I also have concerns for our neighbors on Maureen Lane and Loretta
Drive and want them to be able to keep the unique, old Moorpark ambiance they enjoy as well. Allowing
this development to proceed will significantly change both our worlds.
As a citizen of Moorpark who loves this community and especially cherishes the ambiance and character
of the neighborhood I live in here, I urge the Committee and the Council to not approve the General Plan
Amendment requested by the Warmington Group. If the project appeals to you, please find another parcel
where it won’t impact the quality of life of people who have chosen their homes for that very blessing, as
well as create safety hazards in a very congested part of the city.
Thank you,
Charity Katz
258
From:Stephanie Barton
To:Planning
Subject:Proposed Home Building
Date:Monday, September 14, 2020 4:37:07 PM
Good Afternoon
I am writing you in support of the proposed home development located at Beltramo Road and Moorpark Ave. I
have lived in Moorpark for over 10 years and love our little community. However, I am trying to move my parents
here and am having a hard time finding affordable housing for them. They would love to come to Moorpark to be
near their grandkids. That way , they can be with them during school day so I can work effectively. We love the
family oriented community we live in but it is really lacking affordable housing that would ensure our community
stays in tact.
We really are lacking New, updated, safe housing that would hugely benefit our community and all future residents.
I am in total favor of this project and only see good things to come from it.
Thank You
Stephanie Barton
259
From:Laura Hansen
To:Planning
Subject:General Plan Amendment Application for Proposed Beltramo Ranch Community
Date:Monday, September 14, 2020 6:51:15 PM
Honorable Councilmembers Roseann Mikos and David Pollack:
I am writing to request that the planning commission deny the rezoning request
from Warmington homes.
This development does not fit with the neighborhoods in this semi-rural area. The
zoning should remain the same to preserve the rural nature of the neighborhood. A
low-density ranchette development would allow the applicant to proceed forward
while allowing the current neighborhood to remain the quiet and rural area that it
has always been.
I am concerned about the traffic and parking impact on the Heatherglen
neighborhood. Three- and four-bedroom homes will have more than 2 cars per
home, without accommodating for visitors. This will cause parking problems in a
neighborhood that already has very little parking.
I am also concerned that the city/county/DOT, etc. will eventually require a second
exit out of the neighborhood and it will be right through the park to Harvester,
increasing traffic in front of a park where toddlers play.
And, I am concerned about the traffic impact on the 118. The single entrance will
cause back-ups entering and exiting the neighborhood.
Please do not allow a zoning change. Instead, require the applicant to conform to
the current zoning. A beautiful neighborhood could be developed within the current
zoning.
Please keep
Thank you for your consideration.
Laura Hansen
--
Laura Hansen
260
From:Reggie Mercado
To:Planning
Subject:Beltramo Ranch Project
Date:Monday, September 14, 2020 8:15:29 PM
Dear City Council,
I’m writing in support of the proposed development on LA Ave and Beltramo Rd.
As a member of the community for 17 years and having worked at the site for 12 years, I’m intimately aware of the
need for a quality development on the property.
I watch all day as cats speed down Beltramo Ranch, kicking up dust and driving dangerously presenting a
potentially tragic accident as children are often on our church property and in the general vicinity.
As a father to 2 young adults in their 20’s, a project like this presents an opportunity for young people like them to
live in the city they grew up in whereas currently there is little opportunity to do so.
As a pastor watching droves from my congregation leave California because of the social climate and economic
difficulty to liv the American Dream in SoCal, a project like this makes that dream more affordable and realistic.
We need a project like this in our city to continue to be a place where young families can enjoy the blessing of what
Moorpark offers even as my family benefited from it.
Sincerely,
Reggie Mercado
Sr. Leader
The Fountain
Moorpark, CA.
261
From:Nick Campbell
To:Planning
Subject:Re: General Plan Amendment Pre-Screening for Proposed Beltramo Ranch Community
Date:Monday, September 14, 2020 8:21:29 PM
September 14th, 2020
Moorpark Community & Economic Development Standing Committee
Councilmember Mikos and Councilmember Pollock
799 Moorpark Avenue
Moorpark, CA 93021
Re: General Plan Amendment Pre-Screening for Proposed Beltramo
Ranch Community
Honorable Councilmembers Mikos and Pollock:
As a Moorpark resident I want to express my support for the proposed Beltramo
Ranch community. The proposed community offers the City of Moorpark several
economic benefits which are much needed in our city including:
1.Entry level for-sale housing.
2. Increased property and sales tax.
3. Shoppers/diners to support our stores and restaurants along Los Angeles Avenue.
4. A significant portion (15%) of the homes will be made available
to affordable for-sale buyers.
Again as a long time Moorpark resident I believe that the proposed development is
the right solution for the area and fits well with the adjacent uses. t is for these
important reasons I support the redevelopment of property into the proposed
Beltramo Ranch community.
Sincerely,
Nicholas Campbell PA-C
Orthopedic Physician Assistant
Ventura Orthopedics - Oxnard/Ventura
262
From:Hannah George
To:Planning
Subject:Beltramo Ranch
Date:Monday, September 14, 2020 8:38:07 PM
To Whom it May Concern,
My name is Hannah George - I live with my family in the Peach Hill area, and I have become
aware from the community of a new proposed development called the Beltramo Ranch off of
LA Ave. We are in favor and are hoping to see more housing develop in our city to help
mitigate the rising housing prices and allow more room for the city to grow.
Just wanted to send a quick note voicing our opinion.
Kind Regards,
Hannah
263
From:Cheryl McEwan
To:Planning
Subject:Beltramo Ranch Project
Date:Monday, September 14, 2020 8:41:56 PM
Hello Planning Committee,
I would like to express my interest in this project as I think it will be good for Moorpark.
Warmington has proposed a nicely designed project, consistent with the area and
neighborhood. People need housing, especially the proposed entry level housing in this
community. The proposed project makes sense in this location and should be approved to
move forward with an entitlement application.
I appreciate the updates that Warmington is implementing in the Plan changes and look
forward to seeing the finished Project.
Thank you for your time,
Cheryl McEwan
264
From:Jeff Mayeda
To:Planning
Subject:Re: General Plan Amendment Application for Proposed Beltramo Ranch Community
Date:Monday, September 14, 2020 9:06:07 PM
September 14, 2020
To: Moorpark Community & Economic Development Standing Committee
Councilmembers Roseann Mikos and David Pollack (cc: Mayor Janice Parvin, Councilmembers
Ken Simons
and Chris Enegren)
Re: General Plan Amendment Application for Proposed Beltramo Ranch Community
Honorable Councilmembers Roseann Mikos and David Pollack:
As 30+ year residents of Moorpark, we have seen many changes to our little town. Some good,
some not good. The proposed Beltramo Ranch development on Los Angeles Avenue, adjacent to
Heather Glen (our tract) and the communities on Maureen Lane and Loretta Drive, if allowed,
would fall into the latter category. Although Warmington Group makes grand claims regarding
some minor changes they’ve made to their original plan, they have failed to address serious
issues which are causing us and many others the most concern. These concerns include the
following:
1.Beltramo Ranch doesn’t blend into the character of the surrounding neighborhoods. The
proposed homes appear squeezed onto lots barely bigger than the structure. Some homes
only have a backyard 5 feet deep! When we moved to Moorpark, this wasn’t how we
pictured homes here. If we had wanted this, we would have moved elsewhere. If you take
a drive through the surrounding neighborhoods, they feel roomy with adequate space
between neighboring properties. Beltramo would be the exact opposite.
2.Proposed parking within the development is still inadequate. Each Beltramo single-family
home only has one driveway space allowing for only three vehicle spaces per home.
Duplex homes have no driveway space so only 2 vehicles can be accommodated. In a
perfect world, this might be barely adequate but in today’s world, we all know that garage
space is often used as additional storage space for last year’s holiday decorations and
rarely used camping equipment thereby relegating vehicles outdoors. Also, today’s family
unit which often includes young adults includes additional vehicles which would need
additional parking space. These scenarios would mean that the so-called ‘guest parking’
would be quickly used up by their residents since there is no provision for street parking
within the development. For the surrounding neighborhoods of Heather Glen, Maureen
Lane & Loretta Drive, we can envision those areas being targeted for ‘overflow’ parking on
a regular basis.
3.Only a single entry/exit from this proposed development onto Highway 118. Not only would
Beltramo add to the congestion on 118, which is already a nightmare, but it’s proximity to
the Tierra Rejada intersection and the Warmington’s proposal to allow exits west onto 118
is just asking for problems. Should an accident occur at their entrance/exit, it would
certainly block anyone, including first responders, from entering or exiting Beltramo until it is
cleared up and would bring traffic to a standstill on all of the city’s major arteries as drivers
265
look for ways around the congestion. Even today, we have a hard enough time turning out
onto Tierra Rejada due to the increase in traffic. Beltramo will only make things worse as
neither 118 or Tierra Rejada can smoothly accommodate the added traffic.
4.The light and noise pollution from the development for the immediate neighbors. As
residents of Heather Glen, we can certainly foresee problems with street lights glaring into
the bedrooms of the homes on Elderberry Avenue and Maureen Lane along with sounds of
cars driving mere feet behind their homes at all hours of the day. Not to mention the noise
and pollution from the construction process itself.
5.Lastly, the potential increase in crime. Speaking of vehicles mere feet adjacent to some of
the homes, the proposed ‘guest’ parking, which would certainly be almost always full, would
be an inviting target for break-in’s and who wants that activity right behind you and your
children’s bedrooms. And what would prevent them from hopping the fence into your
property?
There are other objections that we and others have to this development, but almost all these
objections relate to trying to preserve the quality of life that we enjoy in our little slice of Moorpark.
We moved here for the serene and semi-rural nature of Heather Glen at the outside edge of
Moorpark. And we want our neighbors on Maureen Lane and Loretta Drive to be able to keep the
unique, old Moorpark ambiance they enjoy as well. Allowing this development to proceed will
significantly change both our worlds.
As long time citizens of Moorpark who love this community and especially cherish the ambiance
and character of the neighborhood we live in here, we urge the Committee and the Council to not
approve the General Plan Amendment requested by the Warmington Group. If the project appeals
to you, please find another parcel where it won’t impact the quality of life of people who have
chosen their homes for that very blessing.
Thank you,
Jeff & Sui-Yuk Mayeda
Sent from Mail for Windows 10
266
From:Prince Bhebe
To:Planning
Subject:Support for Warmington residential project
Date:Monday, September 14, 2020 9:50:21 PM
We’d like to register our support for the Warmington housing project.
#1: SIGNIFICANT PROJECT PLAN CHANGES
Warmington listened to the community and CEDC council members at the 6.24.2020 meeting. Several community
meetings were held to discuss the proposed project and to understand the concerns of the neighbors. Significant site
plan changes included the following:
• Changed Product Type from Townhome Buildings to SFD & Duplexes
• Reduced Density from 13.8 DU/AC with 102 units versus to 9.3 DU/AC with 69 units
(over 30% less)
• Added ample guest parking (even though not required by code)
• Increased setbacks on sides with homes
• Added higher property line walls and landscape screening
• Provided a large community green space and access to the Arroyo through property
#2: CONSISTENCY WITH CURRENT GENERAL PLAN
The revised plan is consistent with the City’s General Plan Land Use Element Goals & Policies, per highlights
below:
General Plan Land Use Element (LUE) Goal #5: Develop new residential housing which is compatible with the
character of existing individual neighborhoods and minimizes land use incompatibility. GP LUE Policy 5.2: Infill
development in existing residential neighborhoods shall be compatible with the scale and character of the
surrounding neighborhood.
Proposed Beltramo Ranch project is appropriately located adjacent to a major transportation corridor (SR 118),
walking distance from commercial shopping and retail areas, and across the street from existing light industrial
warehouses. Immediately adjacent land uses are a mixture of single-family and duplex homes.
GP LUE Policy 5.3 states, “Landscaped and/or natural vegetation buffer areas shall be provid- ed around and within
residential projects to minimize land use conflicts and privacy impacts.”
Project design minimizes impacts to adjacent properties by exceeding setbacks as stat- ed in the development code,
providing screening through use of higher walls and landscaping, limiting the building height to two-stories for
homes , and orienting win- dows appropriately in order to maintain privacy to adjacent homes.
#3: STATE MANDATE/HOUSING CYCLE
The Governor signed a bill earlier this year (SB330) to implement steps to alleviate the Statewide housing crisis
(Housing Crisis Act of 2019). There is an extreme housing shortage throughout the state and every city is required
by law to add housing stock within their respective city.
The current adopted City Housing Element includes the housing cycle from 2014-2021. Moorpark was required to
build 1,164 housing units, of which approximately half have been built to date. The next housing cycle is underway
and will cover the period 2021-2029 (to be adopted in Oct. 2020). The City of Moorpark was must provide 1,288
units for this next cycle, plus make up for deficiencies from the prior cycle.
Bottom line is that the City of Moorpark must come up with creative ways to meet the large housing demands and
mandates. This includes upzoning, rezoning, increased allowable densities, redevelopment, and the like.
Thanks,
Prince and Fisayo Bhebe
267
From:joshua lambeth
To:Planning
Subject:Beltramo Ranch Project
Date:Monday, September 14, 2020 9:57:21 PM
Hello
It has come to my attention that on Wednesday September 16 the Moorpark city council will
be holding a public hearing regarding the Beltramo Ranch Project. As a resident of Moorpark
for 8 years I would like to state my approval for this project. I believe that it will help beautify
LA avenue and create more places to live without overcrowding the area. Several spots on
LA Avenue are undeveloped and the Beltramo Ranch project would enhance the avenue.
Please vote yes for this project to proceed.
Thank You
Josh Lambeth
Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android
268
From:mgomulasawa7@gmail.com
To:Planning
Subject:Beltramo Ranch
Date:Monday, September 14, 2020 10:06:28 PM
To Whom It May Concerned
It is my understand that the City Planning Department will be Meeting to discuss/vote on this project tomorrow.
Sorry, for the late email.
In a nutshell; The 69 home Beltramo Ranch project as designed is 9.3 units per acre. If this project density is not
approved now, then a much higher density project will be allowed (without a General Plan Amendment or Zone
Change) in a couple years after the GP is updated. The GP update will likely designate these same parcels for at
least 2 x that amount or 20 units to the acre minimum; maybe up to 30 or 35.
Warmington has proposed a nicely designed project, consistent with the area and neighborhood. People need
housing, especially the proposed entry level housing in this community. The proposed project makes sense in this
location and should be approved to move forward with an entitlement application.
Mary Sawa
Moorpark Resident who is in favor of this project
Sent from my iPhone
269
From:
To:Planning
Subject:Sale of Fountain Church property
Date:Monday, September 14, 2020 10:25:51 PM
Sept. 14, 2020
Subject: Sale of the property currently occupied by The Fountain Church
To Whom It May Concern:
This is to encourage a favorable decision concerning the sale of the Fountain Church property on Los
Angeles Ave. in Moorpark.
The plans are favorable for the community of Moorpark and only advantageous for the welfare of the
community.
Please note the following bullet points that are planned:
• Changed Product Type from Townhome Buildings to SFD & Duplexes
• Reduced Density from 13.8 DU/AC with 102 units versus to 9.3 DU/AC with 69 units
(over 30% less)
• Added ample guest parking (even though not required by code)
• Increased setbacks on sides with homes
• Added higher property line walls and landscape screening
• Provided a large community green space and access to the Arroyo through property
Thank you.
Myrene Glass
270
271
From:Jennah Morgan
To:Planning
Subject:Support Beltramo Ranch Community
Date:Tuesday, September 15, 2020 6:27:46 AM
As a Moorpark resident I want to express my support for the proposed Beltramo
Ranch community. The proposed community offers the City of Moorpark many
economic benefits much needed in the city including: entry level for-sale
housing, increased property and sales tax, and shoppers/diners to support
our stores and restaurants along Los Angeles Avenue. Additionally, 15% of the
homes will be made available to affordable for-sale buyers. This proposed
development is the right solution for the area and fits well with the adjacent uses.
In addition I personally owned ranch property in Moorpark for almost 8 years. I’m very
familiar with horses, arenas and farm type animals.
While I understand the neighbors not wanting development to take place on this land, and I
love the fact that they are grandfathered in to specific zones to have farm animals, The
area and location of this land really calls for something more.
The area is not rural Moorpark and practically speaking, the value development would bring
to the city out weighs the few houses that prefer to retain the rural feel.
I sympathize with your decision as it’s not an easy one. It’s definitely not a position
where you can please and satisfy all involved.
I would just ask you to consider the decision that is best for the city now and for the future.
Out of all the spots in Moorpark that more housing is proposed or wanting to be built.. this
land is the BEST area for that.
For all of these reasons I support the redevelopment of property into the proposed
Beltramo Ranch community
272
From:Chris Aitkens
To:Planning
Cc:Sara Aitkens
Subject:Beltramo Ranch Development
Date:Tuesday, September 15, 2020 6:55:46 AM
Date: September 14, 2020
To: Moorpark Community & Economic Development Standing Committee Councilmembers
Roseann Mikos and David Pollack
Cc: Mayor Janice Parvin, Councilmembers Ken Simons and Chris Enegren
Re. General Plan Amendment Application for Proposed Beltramo Ranch Community
Dear Councilmembers Roseann Mikos and David Pollack:
My wife and I wish to express our concerns about the proposed Beltramo Ranch development on
Los Angeles Avenue, which is adjacent to our HOA, Heather Glen. The Warmington Group has
made some changes to the original plan, but we feel they are insufficient to satisfactorily address
the issues that are causing our family, and many others in the community the utmost concern.
These concerns are as follows:
1. A development of this density does not blend into either community’s character.
2. Parking is still an issue - despite the additional spaces that have appeared on the latest plan.
Of particular concern for the folks who live on Elderberry is the addition of 7 more
spaces against the perimeter wall since the last plan we were shown and the apparent
removal of the promised green belt landscaping to accommodate these new spaces.
The additional noise and light pollution right outside bedroom windows is also a
concern.
In addition, there is no street parking and only 2-3 spaces per unit, which makes
overflow parking in Heather Glen a very real concern.
3. Increased chances of traffic collisions associated with the single ingress from/egress to Hwy
#118; especially where the middle lane is being used for left hand turns.
4. Backup traffic for left hand turns onto Tierra Rejada from the 118 highway.
5. Increased congestion on LA Avenue (118), which is already a huge headache during rush
hours and promises to become even more congested once the other approved developments on
LA Avenue are completed.
There are other objections that I and others have to this development, but almost all these
objections relate to trying to preserve the quality of life that we enjoy in our area of Moorpark. We
moved here for the serene and semi-rural nature of Heather Glen at the outside edge of
Moorpark, and we want our neighbors on Maureen Lane and Loretta Drive to be able to keep the
unique ambiance they enjoy as well. Allowing this development to proceed will significantly
273
274
From:Debby
To:Planning
Subject:The Fountain Church Property
Date:Tuesday, September 15, 2020 7:43:44 AM
To Whom it May Concern:
As a long time member of The Fountain I want to submit to you that my husband (Tim) and I are in complete
support of the sale of our current property on LA Ave. in Moorpark. Please consider approving the sale of the
property as this is in the best interest of the church and all parties involved.
Sincerely,
Debby Evrist
Sent from my iPhone
275
From:Martha Brantley
To:Planning
Subject:Support for the Proposed Beltramo Ranch Project
Date:Tuesday, September 15, 2020 8:24:34 AM
I would like to thank you for this opportunity to address the City of Moorpark City Council to
express my support for the approval of the Proposed Beltramo Ranch Project.
I believe that Beltramo Ranch will provide the City of Moorpark with new, much needed
residual housing that is not only compatible with the continuing growth and development of
the City of Moorpark but the design plans blend visually with nearby neighborhoods and
recently developed residential housing and commercial properties along the shared Moorpark
corridor. I also believe that The Beltramo Ranch Project will aid the City of Moorpark in
meeting current growth demands for housing as well as the need for compliance with recent
State mandates for housing development..
Please accept my full endorsement and support for the approval of the Beltramo Ranch
Project.
Sincerely,
Martha S. Brantley
276
277
From:Norma Letinsky
To:Planning
Subject:Support for Beltramo Ranch project
Date:Tuesday, September 15, 2020 9:48:02 AM
To whom it may concern:
I am writing to voice my strong support for the Beltramo Ranch project proposed by
Warmington Homes. There seems to be no valid reason for turning down this project other
than the complaints of disgruntled "not in my backyard" neighbors. This project will be an
improvement to the city of Moorpark in many ways and should receive your full support.
Warmington has listened to the neighbors' concerns and made appropriate changes to their
original plan. For example, they have changed from townhomes to single family dwellings and
duplexes, reduced the density by over 30%, added guest parking, increased setbacks on the
sides with adjacent houses, added higher property line walls and landscape screening, and
provided a large community green space and access to the Arroyo. All these will greatly
enhance this property, which is currently a bit of an eyesore--as well as providing much-
needed additional housing for the city (and thus increasing tax revenue).
Furthermore, the Warmington revised plan is completely consistent with the Moorpark
General Plan's goals and policies. Its location is ideal, the design is well thought out, and will
be a welcome addition to the city of Moorpark.
Sincerely,
Norma Letinsky
Moorpark College Professor Emeritus
278
From:Joy Tangarone
To:Planning
Subject:Please approve Beltramo Ranch
Date:Tuesday, September 15, 2020 9:48:49 AM
Dear City Council,
I would like to add my voice in support of the Beltramo Ranch development. This
housing project is well suited for Moorpark
and the community. The proposed plan is a good size and the density is perfect for the current
neighborhood.
Warmington has proposed a nicely designed project, consistent with the area and
neighborhood. People need housing, especially the proposed entry level housing in
this community. The proposed project makes sense in this location and should be
approved to move forward with an entitlement application.
Sincerely,
Joy Boothe
279
September 15, 2020
To: Planning Center & City Council, Moorpark
RE: Sale & Development of The Fountain Foursquare Church Property
11930 W Los Angeles Ave, Moorpark
To Whom it may concern,
I wanted my opinion to be considered during this process…
I have been present & observed Warmington presenting development plans & interacting with the
community in this immediate area concerning the development of this property. This company has
been very open to receive arguments from both sides, react to concerns, and change development plans
to accommodate the concerns, needs, & desires of the community to help make this transition &
development agreeable to both parties involved. They seem to genuinely care about the neighbors in
this community & welcome the opportunity to be a part of its growth.
Thank you,
Patty McElvy
Office Manager & Director of Church Operations
The Fountain Foursquare Church
280
From:Mary Mercado
To:Planning
Subject:BELTRAMO RANCH PROJECT
Date:Tuesday, September 15, 2020 10:17:44 AM
I want to first thank you for all you do for the City of Moorpark. I know you all do not have an easy
job. But thank you for loving our community and helping to grow our beautiful community.
I want to express my support for the Betramo Ranch Project. I have lived in Moorpark for 17 years.
My husband and I have raised our 3 boys here in Moorpark and we are pastors of The Fountain
Foursquare Church where this project is located. We love Moorpark. It is a fabulous community to
raise a family. As a member of the community, I have noticed that young families are moving, not
only out of Moorpark but out of state due to the high cost of real estate. I believe this project is
wonderful for our community since the homes that are being built are more affordable for young
families. We want to draw people into Moorpark not make it unaffordable to live in this great
community. We want our children to raise their families here. The builders have done a great job
with the plans for this project. I feel they have taken into consideration the neighbors suggestions
and made it work for the neighborhood . I believe this project will only add value to the city of
Moorpark.
Thank you for your time.
Thank you,
Mary Mercado
281
From:Karen Evans
To:Planning
Subject:Housing project on L.A Ave.
Date:Tuesday, September 15, 2020 10:44:32 AM
Dear City Council,
I am sending this letter to urge you to approve the Warmington project on L.A. Ave. The developer has listened to
concerns and made adjustments to nicely fit the needs of our city. We are in great need of more housing in
Moorpark and I think this is a great location and a wonderful planned community. It will be a great addition to our
city.
I urge you to approve their plans and support this project.
Karen Evans
Moorpark resident
Sent from my iPad
282
From:Reggie Mercado
To:Planning
Subject:Beltramo Ranch Project
Date:Tuesday, September 15, 2020 11:10:58 AM
I urge the City of Moorpark to approve this project. It will provide much needed housing and
tax revenue for the City of Moorpark.
283
From:larry lafata
To:Planning
Subject:Warmington 69 unit project
Date:Tuesday, September 15, 2020 12:11:52 PM
To whom it may concern:
I am in favor of the new 69 unit housing project in Moorpark, to be built by Warmington
Homes.
The project is good for our community, bringing growth and support for our local businesses
and community.
It also helps with the housing shortages in So. California.
Warmington is a high quality builder and will do an excellent job in the building of this
project.
I urge you to vote in favor to complete this new housing community.
Thanks
Larry LaFata
40 year Moorpark resident
Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone
284
From:Michael Letinsky
To:Planning
Subject:Support for Beltramo Ranch project
Date:Tuesday, September 15, 2020 12:16:03 PM
Hello,
The email is to express my strong support for the Beltramo Ranch project proposed by
Warmington Homes.
Warmington has had discussions with the neighbors and listened to their concerns. In
response to these discussions Warmington has made appropriate changes to their original plan.
Their revised plan is completely consistent with the Moorpark General Plan's goals and
policies. Its location is ideal, the design is well thought out, and will be a welcome addition to
the city of Moorpark.
In summary, Warmington's modifications include: changing from building townhouses to
single family dwellings and duplexes, reducing the density by over 30%, increased setbacks
on the sides with adjacent houses, and added guest parking. They also include additional
landscape screening, higher property line walls and plans to create a large community green
space and access to the Arroyo. These changes will greatly enhance this property, which is
currently a bit of an eyesore. Most importantly, this project will provide much-needed
additional housing for the city (and thus increasing tax revenue).
I fully support the approval and completion of the Warmington project. I see no reason for
turning down this project other than the complaints of disgruntled "not in my backyard"
neighbors. This project will be an improvement to the city of Moorpark in many ways and
should receive your full support.
Sincerely,
Michael Letinsky
UCLA Professor Emeritus
--
Sent from Postbox
285
Sincerely,
Kim Cook
From:Kimmi Cook
To:Planning
Subject:Development project for 11930 W. Los Angeles Ave
Date:Tuesday, September 15, 2020 12:32:53 PM
To whom it may concern,
I am in support of the development project for the land that is currently occupied by The
Fountain Church.
I believe the developer has met with the neighbors and has altered the plan to address their
concerns.
The City of Moorpark needs new housing and this development will provide that.
The revised plan is consistent with the City’s General Plan.
There is an extreme housing shortage throughout the state and every city is required by law to
add housing stock within their respective city.
Warmington has proposed a nicely designed project, consistent with the area and
neighborhood. People need housing, especially the proposed entry level housing in this
community.
The proposed project makes sense in this location and should be approved to move forward
with an entitlement application.
286
From:Mark Ritchie
To:Planning
Subject:Rezoning of Beltramo Ranch Rd
Date:Tuesday, September 15, 2020 1:31:22 PM
I am against rezoning the development behind Maureen Lane. Allowing a rezoning will negatively impact the life
style we sought and have created here There are too many negatives impact, (traffic/parking, etc) and I cannot see
one positive benefit by allowing a rezoning. Keep it low density residential.
Mark Ritchie
Sent from my iPhone
287
From:Rob Lemons
To:Planning
Subject:BELTRAMO RANCH DEVELOPMENT
Date:Tuesday, September 15, 2020 1:50:59 PM
Dear City Council Members,
As a businessman in Moorpark and having lived and coached in the community for over a
decade, I understand the needs families face economically and the impact the cost of living in
Ventura County/Southern California has on families. We need more economically feasible
housing in Moorpark. This development provides housing to a certain demographic in our
community that would allow families to remain in our city as opposed to finding housing
opportunities out of state as so many are currently doing.
From my understanding, Warmington Builders has accommodated every request from the
surrounding neighborhood, even reducing the number of units originally proposed for the site.
Their proposal is an upgrade over the dirt road, weed fields, and current structures along
Beltramo Rd.
Please favorably consider this important proposal for our city and community members.
Kindly,
Rob Lemons
Owner/Project Manager
SBR Signs ● INKWERKS
Up In Stitches ● Hoops Embroidery
Signs, Screen Printing & Embroidery
"Serving All of Ventura County & Beyond"
288
From:Lee, Heather
To:Planning
Subject:CONCERNS REGARDING BELTRAMO RANCH DEVELOPMENT
Date:Tuesday, September 15, 2020 1:56:25 PM
To: Moorpark Community & Economic Development Standing Committee
Councilmembers Roseann Mikos and David Pollack (cc: Mayor Janice Parvin, Councilmembers
Ken Simons and Chris Enegren)
Re. General Plan Amendment Application for Proposed Beltramo Ranch Community
Honorable Councilmembers Roseann Mikos and DavidPollack:
I wish to express my concerns about the proposed Beltramo Ranch development on Los Angeles
Avenue, which is adjacent to my HOA, Heather Glen, and the communities on Maureen Lane and
Loretta Drive. Granted, the Warmington Group have made some changes to the original plan, but
they are insufficient to satisfactorily address the issues that are causing me and many others the
most concern. These concerns include the following:
A development of this density doesn’t blend into either community’s character
Parking, still, despite the additional spaces that have appeared on the latest plan. Of particular
concern for the folks who live on Elderberry is the addition of 7 more spaces against the perimeter
wall since the last plan we were shown and the apparent removal of promised green belt
landscaping to accommodate these new spaces. The additional noise and light pollution right
outside bedroom windows is also a concern. Plus, there’s no street parking and only 2-3 spaces
per unit, so overflow parking in Heather Glen remains a very real concern.
Increased chances of collisions associated with the single ingress from/egress to Hwy #118 ,
especially where the middle lane is being used for left hand turns.
Backup traffic for left hand turns onto Tierra Rejada from the #118.
Increased congestion on LA Avenue, which is already a huge headache during rush hours and
promises to become a real nightmare once the other approved developments on LA Avenue are
completed.
There are other objections that I and others have to this development, but almost all these
objections relate to trying to preserve the quality of life that we enjoy in our little slice of Moorpark.
We moved here for the serene and semi-rural nature of Heather Glen at the outside edge of
Moorpark. And, we want our neighbors on Maureen Lane and Loretta Drive to be able to keep the
unique, old Moorpark ambiance they enjoy as well. Allowing this development to proceed will
significantly change both our worlds.
As a citizen of Moorpark who loves this community and especially cherishes the ambiance and
character of the neighborhood I live in here, I urge the Committee and the Council to not approve
the General Plan Amendment requested by the Warmington Group. If the project appeals to you,
please find another parcel where it won’t impact the quality of life of people who have chosen their
homes for that very blessing.
Thank you,
Heather Lee
289
From:Ryan Carr
To:Planning
Subject:Re. General Plan Amendment Application for Proposed Beltramo Ranch Community
Date:Tuesday, September 15, 2020 2:22:41 PM
Honorable Councilmembers Roseann Mikos and DavidPollack:
I wish to express my concerns about the proposed Beltramo Ranch development on Los Angeles
Avenue, which is adjacent to my HOA, Heather Glen, and the communities on Maureen Lane and
Loretta Drive. Granted, the Warmington Group have made some changes to the original plan, but
they are insufficient to satisfactorily address the issues that are causing me and many others the
most concern. These concerns include the following:
1. A development of this density doesn’t blend into either community’s character
2. Parking, still, despite the additional spaces that have appeared on the latest plan. Of
particular concern for the folks who live on Elderberry is the addition of 7 more spaces
against the perimeter wall since the last plan we were shown and the apparent removal of
promised green belt landscaping to accommodate these new spaces. The additional noise
and light pollution right outside bedroom windows is also a concern. Plus, there’s no street
parking and only 2-3 spaces per unit, so overflow parking in Heather Glen remains a very
real concern.
3. Increased chances of collisions associated with the single ingress from/egress to Hwy #118
, especially where the middle lane is being used for left hand turns.
4. Backup traffic for left hand turns onto Tierra Rejada from the #118.
5. Increased congestion on LA Avenue, which is already a huge headache during rush hours
and promises to become a real nightmare once the other approved developments on LA
Avenue are completed.
There are other objections that I and others have to this development, but almost all these
objections relate to trying to preserve the quality of life that we enjoy in our little slice of Moorpark.
We moved here for the serene and semi-rural nature of Heather Glen at the outside edge of
Moorpark. And, we want our neighbors on Maureen Lane and Loretta Drive to be able to keep the
unique, old Moorpark ambiance they enjoy as well. Allowing this development to proceed will
significantly change both our worlds.
As a citizen of Moorpark who loves this community and especially cherishes the ambiance and
character of the neighborhood I live in here, I urge the Committee and the Council to not approve
the General Plan Amendment requested by the Warmington Group. If the project appeals to you,
please find another parcel where it won’t impact the quality of life of people who have chosen their
homes for that very blessing.
Thank you,
290
Ryan Carr
291
From:Angela Jones
To:Planning
Subject:Beltramo Ranch
Date:Tuesday, September 15, 2020 2:43:24 PM
Hello,
I am writing in favor of the Beltramo Ranch housing project to provide entry level housing in
this community. Currently, there are less homes in the market than buyers. It would be great to
have additional entry level homes in the market that is consistent with neighborhood and
Moorpark area.
Thank you,
Angela Jones
Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone
292
From:Joseph Kastelic
To:Planning
Subject:General Plan Amendment Application for Proposed Beltramo Ranch Community
Date:Tuesday, September 15, 2020 3:01:22 PM
To: Moorpark Community & Economic Development Standing Committee
Councilmembers Roseann Mikos and David Pollack (cc: Mayor Janice Parvin, Councilmembers Ken Simons and
Chris Enegren)
Honorable Councilmembers Roseann Mikos and DavidPollack:
I wish to express my concerns about the proposed Beltramo Ranch development on Los Angeles Avenue, which is
adjacent to my HOA, Heather Glen, and the communities on Maureen Lane and Loretta Drive. Granted, the
Warmington Group have made some changes to the original plan, but they are insufficient to satisfactorily address
the issues that are causing me and many others the most concern. These concerns include the following:
A development of this density doesn’t blend into either community’s character
Parking, still, despite the additional spaces that have appeared on the latest plan. Of particular concern for the folks
who live on Elderberry is the addition of 7 more spaces against the perimeter wall since the last plan we were shown
and the apparent removal of promised green belt landscaping to accommodate these new spaces. The additional
noise and light pollution right outside bedroom windows is also a concern. Plus, there’s no street parking and only
2-3 spaces per unit, so overflow parking in Heather Glen remains a very real concern.
Increased chances of collisions associated with the single ingress from/egress to Hwy #118 , especially where the
middle lane is being used for left hand turns.
Backup traffic for left hand turns onto Tierra Rejada from the #118.
Increased congestion on LA Avenue, which is already a huge headache during rush hours and promises to become a
real nightmare once the other approved developments on LA Avenue are completed.
There are other objections that I and others have to this development, but almost all these objections relate to
tryingJoseph Kasteli to preserve the quality of life that we enjoy in our little slice of Moorpark. We moved here for
the serene and semi-rural nature of Heather Glen at the outside edge of Moorpark. And, we want our neighbors on
Maureen Lane and Loretta Drive to be able to keep the unique, old Moorpark ambiance they enjoy as well.
Allowing this development to proceed will significantly change both our worlds.
As a citizen of Moorpark who loves this community and especially cherishes the ambiance and character of the
neighborhood I live in here, I urge the Committee and the Council to not approve the General Plan Amendment
requested by the Warmington Group. If the project appeals to you, please find another parcel where it won’t impact
the quality of life of people who have chosen their homes for that very blessing.
Thank you,
Joseph Kastelic
293
From:Frank Lagattuta
To:Planning
Subject:CONCERNS REGARDING BELTRAMO RANCH DEVELOPMENT
Date:Tuesday, September 15, 2020 3:34:02 PM
To: Moorpark Community & Economic Development Standing Committee
Councilmembers Roseann Mikos and David Pollack (cc: Mayor Janice Parvin, Councilmembers
Ken Simons and Chris Enegren)
Re. General Plan Amendment Application for Proposed Beltramo Ranch Community
Honorable Councilmembers Roseann Mikos and DavidPollack:
I wish to express my concerns about the proposed Beltramo Ranch development on Los Angeles
Avenue, which is adjacent to my HOA, Heather Glen, and the communities on Maureen Lane and
Loretta Drive. Granted, the Warmington Group have made some changes to the original plan, but
they are insufficient to satisfactorily address the issues that are causing me and many others the
most concern. These concerns include the following:
1. A development of this density doesn’t blend into either community’s character
2. Parking, still, despite the additional spaces that have appeared on the latest plan. Of
particular concern for the folks who live on Elderberry is the addition of 7 more spaces
against the perimeter wall since the last plan we were shown and the apparent removal of
promised green belt landscaping to accommodate these new spaces. The additional noise
and light pollution right outside bedroom windows is also a concern. Plus, there’s no street
parking and only 2-3 spaces per unit, so overflow parking in Heather Glen remains a very
real concern.
3. Increased chances of collisions associated with the single ingress from/egress to Hwy #118
, especially where the middle lane is being used for left hand turns.
4. Backup traffic for left hand turns onto Tierra Rejada from the #118.
5. Increased congestion on LA Avenue, which is already a huge headache during rush hours
and promises to become a real nightmare once the other approved developments on LA
Avenue are completed.
There are other objections that I and others have to this development, but almost all these
objections relate to trying to preserve the quality of life that we enjoy in our little slice of Moorpark.
We moved here for the serene and semi-rural nature of Heather Glen at the outside edge of
Moorpark. And, we want our neighbors on Maureen Lane and Loretta Drive to be able to keep the
unique, old Moorpark ambiance they enjoy as well. Allowing this development to proceed will
significantly change both our worlds.
As a citizen of Moorpark who loves this community and especially cherishes the ambiance and
character of the neighborhood I live in here, I urge the Committee and the Council to not approve
the General Plan Amendment requested by the Warmington Group. If the project appeals to you,
please find another parcel where it won’t impact the quality of life of people who have chosen their
294
295
From:Valerie Hernandez
To:Planning
Subject:Proposed Beltramo Ranch Community
Date:Tuesday, September 15, 2020 5:46:02 PM
Good afternoon,
I am writing to express my concern about the rezoning of the vacant land next to the Heather
Glen community where I live.
The current traffic on LA Ave alone is a good reason to keep the land zoned as rural. The
increased chances of accidents and additional air pollution that come with the addition of so
many new residences in a small area is concerning. Also concerning is the additional traffic in
our neighborhood from visitors to the high density neighborhood parking here.
A high density community will disrupt the peaceful nature of our neighborhood.
I especially feel bad for the community on Maureen Lane and Loretta Drive who expected to
have a semi-rural ambiance when they purchased or built their homes and the houses along
Elderberry whose backyards may end up backing up to a parking lot. It seems like a low
density community would be a much better fit for this area.
As a citizen of Moorpark who loves this community and especially cherishes the ambiance and
character of the neighborhood I live in here, I urge the Committee and the Council to not approve
the General Plan Amendment requested by the Warmington Group.
Thank you,
Valerie Hernandez
296
From:Lydia B
To:Planning
Subject:Reg: Beltramo Ranch Development.
Date:Tuesday, September 15, 2020 6:26:27 PM
Sent from Mail for Windows 10
To: Moorpark Community & Economic Development Standing Committee
Councilmembers Roseann Mikos and David Pollack (cc: Mayor Janice Parvin, Councilmembers
Ken Simons and Chris Enegren)
Re. General Plan Amendment Application for Proposed Beltramo Ranch Community
Honorable Councilmembers Roseann Mikos and DavidPollack:
I wish to express my concerns about the proposed Beltramo Ranch development on Los
Angeles Avenue, which is adjacent to my HOA, Heather Glen, and the communities on Maureen
Lane and Loretta Drive. Granted, the Warmington Group have made some changes to the
original plan, but they are insufficient to satisfactorily address the issues that are causing me and
many others the most concern. These concerns include the following:
A development of this density doesn’t blend into either community’s character
Parking, still, despite the additional spaces that have appeared on the latest plan. Of particular
concern for the folks who live on Elderberry is the addition of 7 more spaces against the
perimeter wall since the last plan we were shown and the apparent removal of promised green
belt landscaping to accommodate these new spaces. The additional noise and light pollution
right outside bedroom windows is also a concern. Plus, there’s no street parking and only 2-3
spaces per unit, so overflow parking in Heather Glen remains a very real concern.
Increased chances of collisions associated with the single ingress from/egress to Hwy #118 ,
especially where the middle lane is being used for left hand turns.
Backup traffic for left hand turns onto Tierra Rejada from the #118.
Increased congestion on LA Avenue, which is already a huge headache during rush hours and
promises to become a real nightmare once the other approved developments on LA Avenue are
completed.
There are other objections that I and others have to this development, but almost all these
objections relate to trying to preserve the quality of life that we enjoy in our little slice of
Moorpark. We moved here for the serene and semi-rural nature of Heather Glen at the outside
edge of Moorpark. And, we want our neighbors on Maureen Lane and Loretta Drive to be able to
keep the unique, old Moorpark ambiance they enjoy as well. Allowing this development to
proceed will significantly change both our worlds.
As a citizen of Moorpark who loves this community and especially cherishes the ambiance and
character of the neighborhood I live in here, I urge the Committee and the Council to not approve
the General Plan Amendment requested by the Warmington Group. If the project appeals to you,
please find another parcel where it won’t impact the quality of life of people who have chosen
their homes for that very blessing.
Thank you,
297
Sincerely,
Lidia Benjamin
298
From:Becky
To:Planning
Subject:Zoning change re Moorpark-Beltramo Ranch RD
Date:Tuesday, September 15, 2020 6:46:22 PM
I strenuously object to the zoning changes on the Warmington Project on Beltramo Ranch RD. I currently reside on
Maureen Lane and own a major part of the private road, Loretta Lane.
The zoning change to ultra high density residential will lead to the demise of our rural neighborhood and add to the
already existing traffic conditions on LA Ave. This project is not needed on such a small piece of property.....it’s
just over-crowding in a new development.
Thank you for listening to my objections....I just can’t see any good coming out of this project!
Becky Ritchie
4719 Maureen Lane
Sent from my iPhone
299
From:DAnne Moungey
To:Planning
Subject:Maureen Lane Resident
Date:Tuesday, September 15, 2020 7:21:32 PM
Good afternoon, Moorpark Planning Department,
My name is D'Anne Moungey. I live at Maureen Lane. I have lived
here 8 years and I absolutely love it. I moved from Clearwood Road in
Moorpark, literally a stone's throw away. I can't begin to explain how
different it is on this street. I KNOW it's hard to believe until you live
here. You are in the middle of town off LA Avenue and you feel as if you
are in the country.
This neighborhood is just charming and quiet and UNIQUE! I truly hope
one day it could be considered a historic neighborhood. I really hope you
consider preserving it for us. I can't imagine adding two-story houses
right behind my yard. I would completely lose my privacy. Neighbors
would be staring at me in my quiet, peaceful backyard. The noise would
be devastating to me. However, not to mention, the wildlife we get back
here. I watch birds, hawks and butterflies all day. At night we have our
owls that dive into the open field where this development is proposed. It
would be so sad to see nature's land destroyed. Again, I know it's hard to
believe this all goes on in the middle of town, but it is true.
My last concern is LA Avenue. I DO NOT know how much more traffic it
can handle. It's already so impacted, and I understand we have two more
housing developments building on LA Ave. I can't imagine what will
happen during another disaster with fires like last year. I could NOT get
home. 118 was jammed packed. Once we were home, we could NOT get
out to go anywhere. Thankfully, we didn't have to evacuate, but the more
and more building we do will be detrimental to our safety if we have to
evacuate.
I think COVID has all taught us one thing: Family, friends, health and
SIMPLICITY are the most important to us. I hope we can keep that
simplicity to our little neighborhood.
Thank you for your attention to this matter,
D'Anne Moungey
300
From:Day Dove
To:Planning
Subject:Beltramo Ranch Development
Date:Tuesday, September 15, 2020 8:01:34 PM
I’m sure you’ve seen a lot of these, but it’s important you’re aware of the impact this will have on
our community. Please be sure to keep us under consideration when you vote.
To: Moorpark Community & Economic Development Standing Committee
Councilmembers Roseann Mikos and David Pollack (cc: Mayor Janice Parvin, Councilmembers
Ken Simons and Chris Enegren)
Re. General Plan Amendment Application for Proposed Beltramo Ranch Community
Honorable Councilmembers Roseann Mikos and DavidPollack:
I wish to express my concerns about the proposed Beltramo Ranch development on Los Angeles
Avenue, which is adjacent to my HOA, Heather Glen, and the communities on Maureen Lane and
Loretta Drive. Granted, the Warmington Group have made some changes to the original plan, but
they are insufficient to satisfactorily address the issues that are causing me and many others the
most concern. These concerns include the following:
1. A development of this density doesn’t blend into either community’s character
2. Parking, still, despite the additional spaces that have appeared on the latest plan. Of
particular concern for the folks who live on Elderberry is the addition of 7 more spaces
against the perimeter wall since the last plan we were shown and the apparent removal of
promised green belt landscaping to accommodate these new spaces. The additional noise
and light pollution right outside bedroom windows is also a concern. Plus, there’s no street
parking and only 2-3 spaces per unit, so overflow parking in Heather Glen remains a very
real concern.
3. Increased chances of collisions associated with the single ingress from/egress to Hwy #118
, especially where the middle lane is being used for left hand turns.
4. Backup traffic for left hand turns onto Tierra Rejada from the #118.
5. Increased congestion on LA Avenue, which is already a huge headache during rush hours
and promises to become a real nightmare once the other approved developments on LA
Avenue are completed.
There are other objections that I and others have to this development, but almost all these
objections relate to trying to preserve the quality of life that we enjoy in our little slice of Moorpark.
We moved here for the serene and semi-rural nature of Heather Glen at the outside edge of
Moorpark. And, we want our neighbors on Maureen Lane and Loretta Drive to be able to keep the
unique, old Moorpark ambiance they enjoy as well. Allowing this development to proceed will
significantly change both our worlds.
301
As a citizen of Moorpark who loves this community and especially cherishes the ambiance and
character of the neighborhood I live in here, I urge the Committee and the Council to not approve
the General Plan Amendment requested by the Warmington Group. If the project appeals to you,
please find another parcel where it won’t impact the quality of life of people who have chosen their
homes for that very blessing.
Thank you,
Day Dove
Justin Ct. Resident
302
From:Linda G. Hofer, AMS, PCAM
To:Planning
Subject:Warmington Group - Beltramo Ranch Development
Date:Tuesday, September 15, 2020 8:04:42 PM
To: Moorpark Community & Economic Development Standing Committee
Councilmembers Roseann Mikos and David Pollack (cc: Mayor Janice Parvin, Councilmembers Ken
Simons and Chris Enegren)
Re. General Plan Amendment Application for Proposed Beltramo Ranch Community
Honorable Councilmembers Roseann Mikos and David Pollack:
I wish to express my concerns about the proposed Beltramo Ranch development on Los Angeles Avenue,
which is adjacent to my HOA, Heather Glen, and the communities on Maureen Lane and Loretta Drive.
Granted, the Warmington Group have made some changes to the original plan, but they are insufficient to
satisfactorily address the issues that are causing me and many others the most concern. These concerns
include the following:
A development of this density doesn’t blend into either community’s character
Parking, still, despite the additional spaces that have appeared on the latest plan. Of particular concern for
the folks who live on Elderberry is the addition of 7 more spaces against the perimeter wall since the last
plan we were shown and the apparent removal of promised green belt landscaping to accommodate these
new spaces. The additional noise and light pollution right outside bedroom windows is also a concern. Plus,
there’s no street parking and only 2-3 spaces per unit, so overflow parking in Heather Glen remains a very
real concern.
Increased chances of collisions associated with the single ingress from/egress to Hwy #118 , especially
where the middle lane is being used for left hand turns.
Backup traffic for left hand turns onto Tierra Rejada from the #118.
Increased congestion on LA Avenue, which is already a huge headache during rush hours and promises to
become a real nightmare once the other approved developments on LA Avenue are completed.
There are other objections that I and others have to this development, but almost all these objections relate
to trying to preserve the quality of life that we enjoy in our little slice of Moorpark. We moved here for the
serene and semi-rural nature of Heather Glen at the outside edge of Moorpark. And, we want our neighbors
on Maureen Lane and Loretta Drive to be able to keep the unique, old Moorpark ambiance they enjoy as
well. Allowing this development to proceed will significantly change both our worlds.
I urge the Committee and the Council to not approve the General Plan Amendment requested by the
Warmington Group. If the project appeals to you, please find another parcel where it won’t impact the
quality of life of people who have chosen their homes for that very blessing.
Thank you,
303
September 15, 2020
To Whom it May Concern,
My name is Mike Klotz and I live on Maureen Lane. I need to express my
objection to the proposed development behind my property.
I have attended 2 meetings with the developer and one city council meeting to
object changing the zoning for these lots from low density to high density. In my
opinion the developer is not taking into consideration the existing neighborhood
architecture and height limitations. I built a guest house in my backyard and
submitted plans for a master bedroom addition. I was told I could not have a
second story on my guest house. I also had to change my plans on my master
bedroom because the city thought a 12’ outside wall did not conform to the
neighborhood architecture. These units purposed will be 29’ high, 2 story
structures that will look straight down into our yards. This does not seem fair to
me that I had to adhere to the strict rules and conform to the surrounding
neighborhood design, but this developer does not have to.
This development is too dense, too large and does not provide enough parking for
all these units that they plan to cram into such a small space. These large
structures will absolutely destroy our neighborhood as it exists now. Residents of
these new homes will be able to peer directly into our yards and homes and will
take away any privacy that we had previously enjoyed.
The above reasons are why I strongly oppose this development and ask that the
city counsel reject the application to change the zoning and deny this project.
Thank you,
Mike Klotz
304
From:Jo
To:Planning
Subject:Beltramo Ranch Concerns
Date:Tuesday, September 15, 2020 10:38:53 PM
To: Moorpark Community & Economic Development Standing Committee
Councilmembers Roseann Mikos and David Pollack (cc: Mayor Janice Parvin, Councilmembers
Ken Simons and Chris Enegren)
Re. General Plan Amendment Application for Proposed Beltramo Ranch Community
Honorable Councilmembers Roseann Mikos and DavidPollack:
I wish to express my concerns about the proposed Beltramo Ranch development on Los Angeles
Avenue, which is adjacent to my HOA, Heather Glen, and the communities on Maureen Lane and
Loretta Drive. Granted, the Warmington Group have made some changes to the original plan, but
they are insufficient to satisfactorily address the issues that are causing me and many others the
most concern. These concerns include the following:
1. A development of this density doesn’t blend into either community’s character
2. Parking, still, despite the additional spaces that have appeared on the latest plan. Of
particular concern for the folks who live on Elderberry is the addition of 7 more spaces
against the perimeter wall since the last plan we were shown and the apparent removal of
promised green belt landscaping to accommodate these new spaces. The additional noise
and light pollution right outside bedroom windows is also a concern. Plus, there’s no street
parking and only 2-3 spaces per unit, so overflow parking in Heather Glen remains a very
real concern.
3. Increased chances of collisions associated with the single ingress from/egress to Hwy #118
, especially where the middle lane is being used for left hand turns.
4. Backup traffic for left hand turns onto Tierra Rejada from the #118.
5. Increased congestion on LA Avenue, which is already a huge headache during rush hours
and promises to become a real nightmare once the other approved developments on LA
Avenue are completed.
There are other objections that I and others have to this development, but almost all these
objections relate to trying to preserve the quality of life that we enjoy in our little slice of Moorpark.
We moved here for the serene and semi-rural nature of Heather Glen at the outside edge of
Moorpark. And, we want our neighbors on Maureen Lane and Loretta Drive to be able to keep the
unique, old Moorpark ambiance they enjoy as well. Allowing this development to proceed will
significantly change both our worlds.
As a citizen of Moorpark who loves this community and especially cherishes the ambiance and
character of the neighborhood I live in here, I urge the Committee and the Council to not approve
the General Plan Amendment requested by the Warmington Group. If the project appeals to you,
please find another parcel where it won’t impact the quality of life of people who have chosen their
305
homes for that very blessing.
Thank you,
Jo Baldwin
306
From:Patricia Martin
To:Planning
Subject:Beltramo Road Project
Date:Tuesday, September 15, 2020 11:16:14 PM
Moorpark councilman and Moorpark City Planner,
When the COVID took place and there were a few of us that had to continue with work, Los Angeles Avenue hadn’t
been that peaceful since the early 80’s. Now that businesses are starting to open up and people returning to work the
traffic has picked up, although not as bad. Well, at least not just yet. Not Everyone in town has returned to work.
That means increased traffic. Oh wait, Moorpark College isn’t back in-person sessions and neither has all the
schools and school district isn’t back to full capacity in Moorpark. Yet “they want to change Beltramo Road from
low density into high density!” NO! NO! WHY? Well!! Let me tell you why! that will increase double the traffic,
no... most likely triple the traffic because of the 2 car per household...oh WAIT! I would say approximately half of
the residents most likely have teenagers with licenses and knowing Moorpark residence have to keep up with the
Jones’s has another car added to the numbers. So it is “triple the traffic.”
Just imagine if you were living on Maureen Ln, low density, why not make it cohesive by keeping Beltramo Road
low density with the same type of home like ours. Elderberry Ave residents liked that their yards are not backed up
to anybody. That is a good selling point for them. I would request that the other side of Maureen Lane, the HUGE
OPEN FIELD be the same. Give some continuity to our neighborhood.
Making it look, feel and be extra busy causes anxiety amongst people. Would cause even an increase spread of
COVID or any flu. And having to be in this darnedest COVID and they want to add more people when we’re to be
distancing.???
Come People! Think...it seems that when something happens the Government can start an uproar! If that were to
happen, I certainly don’t want that many people surrounding us!
We are TOTALLY AGAINST the change from Low Density to High Density.
Thank you
Sincerely
Dan and Patty Martin
Maureen Residents
Sent from my iPhone
307
From:Irene Gutierrez
To:Planning
Subject:Development Standing Committee
Date:Tuesday, September 15, 2020 11:43:22 PM
Sent from my iPad Dear Councilmen, As long time residents of the city of Moorpark and residents on Maureen
Lane, my husband and l (Victor and Irene Gutierrez) greatly and strongly oppose the proposal of zoning the property
behind Maureen Lane to High -Density from Low- Density. We strongly oppose the zoning proposal because of
dense population,lack of privacy by building two story houses,traffic,parking,destroying our existing rural suburban
atmosphere,light pollution,noise,and lack of safety for our children and grandchildren because of traffic issues.
Because, of these reasons we strongly suggest that our Moorpark Councilmen consider The Heather Glen
Community and our Maureen Lane neighbors. Thank you, Irene Gutierrez
308
309
Thank you,
Jane May-Ahearn
Moorpark
Sent from my iPhone
310
Once again, we are writing to you in opposition to the proposed Zone change from Low Density
Residential to High Density and Very High Density Residential on land known as Beltramo Ranch.
The Developer has made changes to the proposed project based on the public comments presented in
writing and in person at several neighborhood meetings. However, problems remain, namely approving
this development, which is highly inconsistent with the developments in existence for many years to the
East and West of the proposed project. I would like to speak to the issues we have as residents of our
small private road called Loretta Drive:
We are a small street of residential animal keeping properties of approximately one acre lots. We are
used to flies (no matter how hard we try to minimize the problem), dirt and dust (most of our rear
properties are unpaved and we have no sidewalks), noise (horses, chickens/roosters, donkeys, tractors,
etc.) and the lack of street lighting (neither Maureen Lane nor Loretta Drive have street lights). We like
it like this! We purchased our properties based on this very criteria.
No matter what changes you have made, and we acknowledge you have made changes, moving forward
with this project will adversely affect the very nature of our existence! There are very few
neighborhoods in Moorpark that still remain animal keeping.
Traffic is very heavy at peak times on Los Angeles Avenue. You are proposing to dump approximately
220 extra vehicles onto this major highway, not taking into account the active projects both to the East
of Maureen Lane and the property on the north side of Los Angeles Avenue between Shasta and the
current development which includes the former Albertson’s center (currently a gym, Grocery Outlet,
Tractor Supply, etc.).
These issues make the proposed project a detriment to the our rural neighborhood and to the City!
Respectfully,
Chris and Martha Peltonen
311
KASCO, L.P.
, Thousand Oaks, CA 91362
Phone ( Fax (
September 15, 2020
City of Moorpark
Community Development Department
799 Moorpark Avenue
Moorpark, CA 93021
Re: L.A. Avenue & Beltramo Ranch Road Development
To Whom It May Concern,
I am writing in support of Warmington Group filed a General Plan Amendment Pre -
Screening application to change the land use designation of 7.4 acres of land at the
southeast corner of Los Angeles Avenue and Beltramo Ranch Road from Low Density
Residential (L), High Density Residential (H) and Open Space and Recreation (P) to
Very High Density Residential (VH) for the development of a 102-unit residential
condominium project and associated site improvements, collectively referred to as
“Beltramo Ranch”.
The vacant land has been an eyesore for many years and I believe the affordable
housing project will be a wonderful addition to the community. Moorpark is in
desperate need of more housing and the plans I have seen look like the homes will not
only help with the housing issue, but will also add visual pleasure to the neighbors and
street traffic driving by on a daily basis.
I am looking forward to seeing this project come to fruition in the near future.
Sincerely,
KASCO, L.P.
William Alan Satterlee
312
Maria Giuliano
September 16, 2020
Re: Beltramo Ranch Road Project Before the City of Moorpark
To Whom It May Concern,
I live in Newbury Park but my boyfriend lives and works in Moorpark. I drive past this site often
and think the upgrade to the street with the much needed housing proposed would be
amazing.
With the increase in rents in the past several years, I am now having to have roommates live
with me in my home so I can afford the monthly rent. My children have to rent rooms in other
people’s homes so they can afford to stay in California.
It would be really nice to have something close by that they could afford to purchase or rent as
they are all in their 20’s and 30’s and it seems will never be able to be able to purchase a home
or condominium anywhere near here.
I 100% support this project and feel it would also add to the visual aesthetics of the
neighborhood.
Thank you for hearing my support,
Maria Giuliano
313
From:M S
To:Planning; M S
Subject:support for Beltramo Ranch
Date:Wednesday, September 16, 2020 12:41:22 PM
September16, 2020
Dear City Council Members,
I am writing in support of the Warmington Group filed a General Plan Amendment Pre-
Screening application to change the land use designation collectively referred to as “Beltramo
Ranch”.
We as a state are in desperate need of more housing. The housing shortage is causing financial
and emotional stress on many if not most Californians. Because of the housing shortage,
housing prices and rental payment are reaching sky rocking levels that are causing numerous
problems. Many Californian families are being hit so hard that their children cannot move out
of their parents’ homes. Record numbers of young adults from 18 to mid 30s, simply don’t
have enough money to pay rents or buy homes. The American dream is slipping away!
I’m speaking personally, as my young adult children are currently living in our home because
of this crisis. (The empty nest may never occur!) The housing crisis is also forcing family
separation as our children are being forced to move out of state so that they can simply live a
normal life where all their money is not being used for housing. Finally, the housing crisis is
also causing record numbers of homelessness. This problem is not only happening in big cities
but is increasing in Thousand Oaks and Moorpark!
Thankfully, our Governor signed a bill passed by the legislature earlier this year (SB330) to
implement a plan to alleviate the Statewide housing crisis (Housing Crisis Act of 2019). Our
families will finally have a life line that will help address our dire situations!
There is an extreme housing shortage throughout the state and every city is required by law to
add housing stock within their respective city. Experts say there is a shortage of 3-4 million
housing units! In 2018, California ranked 49th among the 50 United States in housing units per
resident!
This is simply unacceptable and putting an undue burden on all Californians!
The current adopted City Housing Element includes the housing cycle from 2014-2021.
Moorpark was required to build 1,164 housing units, of which approximately half have been
built to date.
The next housing cycle is underway and will cover the period 2021-2029 (to be adopted in
Oct. 2020). The City of Moorpark must provide 1,288 units for this next cycle, plus make up
for deficiencies from the prior cycle.
The bottom line is that the City of Moorpark must come up with creative ways to meet the
large housing demands and mandates. This includes up zoning, rezoning, increased allowable
densities, redevelopment, and the like. I urge the council to adopt this beautifully designed
314
project by the Warmington Group, which will help alleviate problems for our families and
Moorpark! Please help our children and young adults realize their American Dream!
Sincerely,
Mark Satterlee
315
From:Rebecca
To:Planning
Subject:Public Comment: Item 4A
Date:Wednesday, September 16, 2020 12:43:15 PM
Good Afternoon Community and Economic Development Committee,
I am writing to you in support of rezoning the site from "Low Density" to "Very High
Density," which would allow 69 homes to be built.
Thank You,
Rebecca
316
From:Kuo-Yen Szema
To:Planning
Subject:Beltramo Ranch deleopment on LosAngeles Ave
Date:Wednesday, September 16, 2020 12:49:56 PM
September 9, 2020
To: Moorpark Community & Economic Development Standing Committee
Councilmembers Roseann Mikos and David Pollack (cc: Mayor Janice Parvin, Councilmembers
Ken Simons
and Chris Enegren)
Re. General Plan Amendment Application for Proposed Beltramo Ranch Community
Honorable Councilmembers Roseann Mikos and David Pollack:
I wish to express my concerns about the proposed Beltramo Ranch development on Los Angeles
Avenue, which is adjacent to my HOA, Heather Glen, and the communities on Maureen Lane and
Loretta Drive. Granted, the Warmington Group have made some changes to the original plan, but
they are insufficient to satisfactorily address the issues that are causing me and many others the
most concern. These concerns include the following:
1. A development of this density doesn’t blend into either community’s character
2. Parking, still, despite the additional spaces that have appeared on the latest plan.
Of particular concern for the folks who live on Elderberry is the addition of 7 more spaces against the
perimeter wall since the last plan we were shown and the apparent removal of promised green belt
landscaping to accommodate these new spaces. The additional noise and light pollution right outside
bedroom windows is also a concern. Plus, there’s no street parking and only 2-3 spaces p/unit, so
overflow parking in Heather Glen remains a very real concern.
3. Increased chances of collisions associated with the single ingress from/egress to Hwy #118 ,
especially where the middle lane is being used for left hand turns.
4. Backup traffic for left had turns onto Tierra Rejada from the #118.
5. Increased congestion on LA Avenue, which is already a huge headache during rush hours and
promises to become a real nightmare once the other approved developments on LA Avenue are
completed.
There are other objections that I and others have to this development, but almost all these
objections relate to trying to preserve the quality of life that we enjoy in our little slice of Moorpark.
We moved here for the serene and semi-rural nature of Heather Glen at the outside edge of
Moorpark. And we want our neighbors on Maureen Lane and Loretta Drive to be able to keep the
unique, old Moorpark ambiance they enjoy as well. Allowing this development to proceed will
significantly change both our worlds.
317
As a citizen of Moorpark who loves this community and especially cherishes the ambiance and
character of the neighborhood I live in here, I urge the Committee and the Council to not approve
the General Plan Amendment requested by the Warmington Group. If the project appeals to you,
please find another parcel where it won’t impact the quality of life of people who have chosen their
homes for that very blessing.
Thank you,
Sincerely
Sandy Szema
318
From:
To:Planning; Jeff Markel
Subject:Opposition in Maureen Lane
Date:Wednesday, September 16, 2020 2:15:39 PM
Attn: City of Moorpark Development
Jeff Markel and Elaine Carrillo strongly oppose proposed development and zone changes on property immediately
west of Maureen Lane.
We cherish our privacy and rural unique property on Maureen Lane. We oppose two story homes and excessive and
unsafe traffic - especially during emergency situations. Please listen to the existing residents at Heather Glen and
Maureen Lane properties and deny the proposed developers’ plan.
Thank you for your serious considerations.
Respectfully,
Jeff Markel and Elaine Carrillo
Sent from my iPhone
319
From:
To:Planning
Cc:Roseann Mikos; David Pollock; Troy Brown; Karen Vaughn
Subject:GPA Pre-screening Application No.2019-02 -Warmington Group
Date:Wednesday, September 16, 2020 2:35:18 PM
Committee Members Mikos and Pollock,
I urge the CEDC to recommend denial of the subject GPA request. Even with the reduced
density and modified site plan the proposal is not compatible with the adjoining single family
neighborhoods.
The City's General Plan Goals and Policies require in-fill projects to have compatible scale
and character and to provide facilities and infrastructure to support the proposed development.
This proposed project does not provide adequate on-site parking compared to the adjacent
neighborhoods.
The Heather/Glen neighborhood is developed with single family standards for parking. Both
the attached and detached homes have either a two car garage or single car garage with
adjacent carport along with 2 spaces in their driveway. In addition the streets are 36-40 feet
wide and provide parking for at least another one more car per house for a total of 5 cars per
house. The Maureen Lane homes have deep and relatively wide lots with street parking which
has historically met the parking needs for this semi-rural neighborhood.
The Villa Campesina project on Leta Yancy Rd. has only a single car garage and 2 driveway
spaces with limited street parking of less than 1 space per house. The parking issues with this
neighborhood are well documented. More recently the Canterbury Lane and Ivy Creek
projects were built with 2 car garages and shorter than usual driveway lengths of about 16 feet
with no street parking except on the collector streets of Majestic ( 1 side only ) and
Majestic/Edenbridge. The parking in this area is further stressed with the overflow from the
condominiums and apartments to the west.
I see number of design issues with the proposed project as presented but the
overriding concern is the lack of compatibility with the existing adjacent single family
neighborhoods most notably parking.
In my opinion this can only be remedied by further reduction in the number of proposed units
in the project.
Since this proposal is for a GPA with 69 units I urge you to recommend denial to the City
Council. Thank you for considering my concerns with this proposal.
320
From:Lee Black
To:David Pollock; Roseann Mikos; Planning; Moorpark; Troy Brown; Karen Vaughn
Cc:Lee Black; Veronica Black - KWC; Reggie Mercado; Nick Schiele; M S
Subject:Beltramo Ranch - Property Owners
Date:Wednesday, September 16, 2020 2:45:15 PM
Attachments:image003.png
Discussion 09-16-2020.docx.pdf
Mayor Pro Tem Pollack and Councilmember Mikos, Ph.D.
On behalf of Mark Satterlee and Nick Schiele two of the three property owners of the proposed Beltramo
Ranch community attached is their written testimony concerning tonight’s Community and Economic
Development Standing Committee. Having reviewed your public comments and positions we understand
that you both have always taken a larger citywide view concerning all issues in the City of Moorpark. The
proposed community address may issues facing Moorpark including: the loss of retail/restaurants,
affordable housing, need for workforce/entry level housing and bring jobs closer to employers.
We completely agree with Councilmember Mikos October 3, 2016 comments in the Ventura County Star.
Moorpark has had problems attracting and retaining major retailers. What would you do to make
the city of Moorpark more business friendly?
The question implies (erroneously) that it is hard to attract/retain major retailers because Moorpark is not
business friendly. This is not so. The Kosmont Rose annual cost of doing business survey has
consistently recognized Moorpark as one of the lowest cost cities in which to do business in
California. That is being business-friendly. Moorpark attracted and has retained Target and Kohl’s by
being business friendly. Many retailers who left have downsized nationwide, not because of Moorpark.
Moorpark has a low daytime population, and is surrounded by bigger cities with higher populations, which
is the primary problem. One cannot blame Moorpark for the recession. Stalled housing projects are
starting to move forward. Increased population will help more than any other factor.
We request that you continue your citywide view and support the General Plan Pre-Screen Application for
Beltramo Ranch.
On behalf of the three owners, thank you!
Lee Black
Managing Director
CA DRE 00897065
321
September 16, 2020
City of Moorpark
Attn: Community and Economic Development Standing Committee
Mayor Pro Tem Pollack
Councilmember Mikos, Ph. D.
799 Moorpark Avenue
Moorpark, CA 93021
Re: General Plan Amendment Pre-Screen for Beltramo Ranch
Honorable Mayor Pro Tem Pollack and Councilmember Mikos, Ph. D.:
We understand that a land use decision is one of the most difficult decisions that any City Councilmember
is asked. It is difficult and hard to do, this is why the State of California continues to take away more and
more local control in this arena. In the end, you are being asked you to make decision that regardless of
the outcome will upset someone and most likely everyone, there are no easy answers concerning land
use. Ultimately, what we are asking for you to do tonight is to take the larger citywide view that you are
both on the public record supporting.
Mayor Pro Tem Pollack, as the member of Board of Directors for the Southern California Association of
Governments (SCAG) and Chair of SCAG’s Energy and Environment Committee on September 3, 2020 you
reviewed the SCAG’s sustainable communities guidelines, this is a long-range vision that builds upon and
expands land use and transportation strategies established over several planning cycles to increase
mobility options and achieve a more sustainable growth pattern. The proposed community before you
tonight meet’s the goals and objectives of SCAG’s sustainable communities guidelines.
Councilmember Mikos, as a member of Board of Directors of the Ventura County Economic Development
Collaborative (EDC), in April 2019 the EDC issues Comprehensive Economic Development Strategy. On
page 15 of the report it states, Ventura County suffers from a severe shortage of housing, impacting the
affordability for those already in the region and hindering the attraction and retention of human capital
to the area due to the lack of available housing and affordable rents. This jobs -housing imbalance
impacts the ability of the county to diversify its economic base and further withstand major disruptions
to international and national economies. The same paragraph concludes with the following statement,
the risk presented by a scarcity in housing and concomitant high rents, can substantially impact the
quantity and quality of human capital in the region, a primary economic asset for the county.
Page 20 of the same report states a weakness of Ventura County is a, lack of affordable workforce
housing, shortage of sufficient housing stock for all income levels, sh ortage of new projects in
development.
DocuSign Envelope ID: 36D589F4-78A1-4227-92ED-358E773B7520
322
Mayor Pro Tem Pollock and Councilmember Mikos both of you are both supporters of SOAR.
Councilmember Mikos you are the biggest support and leader of the SOAR initiative in the City of
Moorpark, it is possible that SOAR might not be the law of the land without your hard work and support.
We are asking you to support the ideals and key arguments stated in the SOAR initiative that were
approved by a 3 to 1 margin in the City of Moorpark:
Prevention of urban sprawl, protection of open space and agricultural resources, and the
maximization of infrastructure, are significant concerns of the citizens of Moorpark.
To continue to successfully promote stability in long-term planning for the City by establishing a
cornerstone policy within the General Plan designating the geographic limits of long term urban
development and allowing sufficient flexibility within those limits to respond to the City’s
changing needs over time;
To continue to encourage efficient growth patterns and protect the City of Moorpark’s quality
of life by concentrating future development largely within existing developed areas consistent
with the availability of infrastructure and services;
To continue to manage the City’s growth in a manner that fosters and protects the small town
and semi-rural character of Moorpark while encouraging appropriate economic development in
accordance with the City’s unique local conditions;
To allow the City to continue to meet its reasonable housing needs for all economic segments
of the population, especially low and moderate income households, by directing the
development of housing into areas where services and infrastructure are more efficiently
available;
Finally, regarding RHNA, the staff reports states, that the City of Moorpark needs to issue 637 permits to
meet the needs of the current housing cycle and is looking at up to 1,288 additional homes being assisted
to Moorpark in the next housing cycle. The current proposal of 69 homes will help to offset the RHNA
allocation and provide affordable housing.
While it is not a popular opinion or something that is talked about is the fact that for in order for the City
of Moorpark to receive an approved Housing Element in the next housing cycle from the State of California
and as part the General Plan 2050 the city will be to looking for properties to up-zone to meet RHNA
requirements. The properties that comprise Beltramo Ranch will be an ideal location for what will become
the new Very High Density zoning at 20-30 units/acre that city will need to create the next Housing
Element and General Plan 2050. Many listening to me will believe that this is a threat, to those of you
who, I encourage you to ask how Staff and the City Council how do they plan on placing 1,926 new homes
in the city without up-zoning properties? If they don’t, the alternative is the city does not have an
approved Housing Element and potentially lose all land use authority to the State of California.
Mayor Pro Tem Pollack and Councilmember Mikos, we encourage you to continue your citywide views,
believe that the developer listened to community to minimize impacts while developing a community that
can be built. We request that you recommend approval the General Plan Pre-Screen to the full City
Council.
In closing, we agree with Councilmember Mikos September 5, 2020 comment during her, Roseann Mikos
for Moorpark Mayor 2020 interview,
Do you need housing? Absolutely for all income levels.
DocuSign Envelope ID: 36D589F4-78A1-4227-92ED-358E773B7520
323
You should be having your development where the infrastructure is, where sewer are,
where the roads are, where the business are…
Focus the development inside the cities where it belongs and focus the farmland and
open space outside so that you have the respite as a family or as people it’s so important
to think about that philosophically because it just makes common sense.
Thank you for your time and consideration, please continue to keep your citywide and regional
prospective.
Sincerely,
DocuSign Envelope ID: 36D589F4-78A1-4227-92ED-358E773B7520
9/16/2020
Mark Satterlee on behalf of KASCO Nick Schiele
9/16/2020
324
From:Max Ghenis
To:Planning
Subject:Support for 69 homes (item 4A)
Date:Wednesday, September 16, 2020 4:01:58 PM
Please approve the project.
Max Ghenis
325
W LOS ANGELES AVETIERRA REJADA RDGLENWOOD PARKSITEPROJECTMAUREEN LANELORETTA DRIVEELDERBERRY AVENUEArchitecture + Planning17911 Von Karman Ave,Suite 200Irvine, CA 92614949.851.2133ktgy.com#MOORPARK - BELTRAMO RANCHMOORPARK, CA 2018-0860Warmington Residential3090 Pullman StreetCosta Mesa, CA 92626BELTRAMO RANCHM O O R P A R K , C A L I F O R N I ADEVELOPER:WARMINGTON RESIDENTIAL3090 PULLMAN STREETCOSTA MESA, CA 92626714.434.4439ARCHITECT:KTGY ARCHITECTURE + PLANNING17911 VON KARMAN AVENUE, STE 200IRVINE, CA 92614949.851.2133PREPARED FOR: COMMUNITY & ECONOMICDEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE(CEDC #2; SEPT. 16, 2020)PROJECT TEAMVICINITY MAP NTSARCHITECTURALA0.0 SHEET INDEXA1.0 CONCEPTUAL SITE PLANA1.1 CIRCULATION EXHIBITA2.0 IMAGE BOARDA3.0 CONCEPTUAL ELEVATIONA4.0 SAMPLE FLOOR PLAN 1A4.1 SAMPLE FLOOR PLAN 2A4.2 SAMPLE FLOOR PLAN 3A4.3 SAMPLE FLOOR PLAN DUPLEXA5.0 SITE SECTIONSA5.1 SITE SECTIONSCIVIL:STANTEC111 EAST VICTORIA STREETSANTA BARBARA, CA 93101805.308.9159SHEET INDEXAUGUST 25, 2020SEPTEMBER 03, 2020ATTACHMENT 4326
RIGHT TURN LANEPedestrian Gate Access to Glenwood Park8' Sound Wall11.0'25.0'15.0'RIGHT TURN LANE10.0'Park Area (±45,000sf)Green Space to be ProgrammedW. LOS ANGELES AVE.MEDIANBREAK6.2'25.0'20.0'58.2'48.2'49.8'41.8'61.1'61.0'60.6'42.9'15.0'10.0'20.0'LORETTA DRIVEPrivate Vehicular Gate6'-8' Wall6'-8' WallGuest ParkingDriveway Typ.LEFT TURN LANE4.0'25.0'25.0'712.0'14.0'45.0'57.8'41.1'11 12131415161718192021224140232526272410.0'24.0'25.0'10.0'5.0'65151743872110 912 1114 1332333435222324FUTURE PEDESTRIANGATE ACCESS TOARROYO SIMIFUTURE POTENTIAL PARKING FORPUBLIC ACCESS TO GLENWOODPARK AND ARROYO SIMIFUTURE PUBLIC ACCESSTHROUGH PROJECT GREENSPACE TO ARROYO SIMIFUTURE PEDESTRIAN AND EQUESTRIAN GATEACCESS TO ARROYO SIMI AND LORETTA DRIVEArchitecture + Planning17911 Von Karman Ave,Suite 200Irvine, CA 92614949.851.2133ktgy.com#MOORPARK - BELTRAMO RANCHMOORPARK, CA 2018-0860Warmington Residential3090 Pullman StreetCosta Mesa, CA 92626Site Plan SummarySite Area: ±7.4 ac. (±323,000sf)Home Mix: 17 homes - Plan 1 (1845sf - 3bd/2.5ba) 20 homes - Plan 2 (1970sf - 3bd+Loft/2.5ba) 10 homes - Plan 3 (2045sf - 4bd+Loft/3ba) 47 homes - Total SFD 22 Duplex homes (1900-2000sf - 3bd+Opt Bed4/2.5ba)Total Units: 69 homesSite Density: ±9.3 du/acCONCEPTUAL SITE PLANSEPTEMBER 03, 202005010025Parcel Addresses & APNsExisting ZoningBeltramo Ranch Road RE-1APN: 504-0-021-19511930-11934 West Los Angeles Ave. RE-20APN: 506-0-030-220APN: 506-0-030-210APN: 506-0-030-235APN: 506-0-030-04511944 West Los Angeles Ave. ROAPN: 506-0-030-255Proposed Zoning: RPD*Parking Provided: 138 spaces - Garage Spaces 47 spaces - Driveway 35 spaces - Guest On-Site 220 spaces - Total (±3.2 sp/unit)Building Coverage: 30%Proposed Building Height: SFD ±26'; Duplexes ±29' (2nd Floor Window Height ±18'-6")Open Space Provided: ±48,000sf - Private Yards ±45,000sf - Park Area ±93,000sf - Total Open Space Provided (30% of site)R-2* Developmental Standards:Density - "Very High Density": 15 du/acFront Yard Setback: 20'Interior Side Yard Setback: 5'Street Side Yard Setback: 10'Rear Yard Setback: 15'Lot Coverage: 50%Building Height: 35'Resident Parking: 2.5 sp/unit*Conceptual Site Plan is compliant with R-2 zoning, standards,however project is seeking RPD zoning and Very High Density ResidentialLEGENDPUBLIC GATE ACCESSFLOOD PLAIN LIMIT LINEPEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION327
/HJHQG9HKLFXODU&LUFXODWLRQ 3HGHVWULDQ&LUFXODWLRQ 2SHQ6SDFH328
Architecture + Planning17911 Von Karman Ave,Suite 200Irvine, CA 92614949.851.2133ktgy.comPlot Date:08.10.2020Warmington Residential3090 Pullman StreetCosta Mesa, CA 92626BELTRAMO RANCHMOORPARK, CA # 2018-0860SCALE: NTSArchitecture + Planning17911 Von Karman Ave,Suite 200Irvine, CA 92614949.851.2133ktgy.com#MOORPARK - BELTRAMO RANCHMOORPARK, CA 2018-0860Warmington Residential3090 Pullman StreetCosta Mesa, CA 92626CIRCULATION EXHIBITAUGUST 10, 2020Architecture + Planning17911 Von Karman Ave,Suite 200Irvine, CA 92614949.851.2133ktgy.com#MOORPARK - BELTRAMO RANCHMOORPARK, CA 2018-0860Warmington Residential3090 Pullman StreetCosta Mesa, CA 92626CIRCULATION EXHIBITAUGUST 10, 2020Architecture + Planning17911 Von Karman Ave,Suite 200Irvine, CA 92614949.851.2133ktgy.com#MOORPARK - BELTRAMO RANCHMOORPARK, CA 2018-0860Warmington Residential3090 Pullman StreetCosta Mesa, CA 92626CIRCULATION EXHIBITAUGUST 10, 2020Architecture + Planning17911 Von Karman Ave,Suite 200Irvine, CA 92614949.851.2133ktgy.com#MOORPARK - BELTRAMO RANCHMOORPARK, CA 2018-0860Warmington Residential3090 Pullman StreetCosta Mesa, CA 92626CIRCULATION EXHIBITAUGUST 10, 2020IMAGE BOARDSEPTEMBER 03, 2020329
Architecture + Planning17911 Von Karman Ave,Suite 200Irvine, CA 92614949.851.2133ktgy.com#MOORPARK - BELTRAMO RANCHMOORPARK, CA 2018-0860Warmington Residential3090 Pullman StreetCosta Mesa, CA 92626PROPOSED EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS DETACHED SINGLE FAMILY HOMES PAIRED HOMESArchitecture + Planning17911 Von Karman Ave,Suite 200Irvine, CA 92614949.851.2133ktgy.comPlot Date:08.10.2020Warmington Residential3090 Pullman StreetCosta Mesa, CA 92626BELTRAMO RANCHMOORPARK, CA # 2018-0860SCALE: NTSArchitecture + Planning17911 Von Karman Ave,Suite 200Irvine, CA 92614949.851.2133ktgy.com#MOORPARK - BELTRAMO RANCHMOORPARK, CA 2018-0860Warmington Residential3090 Pullman StreetCosta Mesa, CA 92626CIRCULATION EXHIBITAUGUST 10, 2020Architecture + Planning17911 Von Karman Ave,Suite 200Irvine, CA 92614949.851.2133ktgy.com#MOORPARK - BELTRAMO RANCHMOORPARK, CA 2018-0860Warmington Residential3090 Pullman StreetCosta Mesa, CA 92626CIRCULATION EXHIBITAUGUST 10, 2020Architecture + Planning17911 Von Karman Ave,Suite 200Irvine, CA 92614949.851.2133ktgy.com#MOORPARK - BELTRAMO RANCHMOORPARK, CA 2018-0860Warmington Residential3090 Pullman StreetCosta Mesa, CA 92626CIRCULATION EXHIBITAUGUST 10, 2020Architecture + Planning17911 Von Karman Ave,Suite 200Irvine, CA 92614949.851.2133ktgy.com#MOORPARK - BELTRAMO RANCHMOORPARK, CA 2018-0860Warmington Residential3090 Pullman StreetCosta Mesa, CA 92626CIRCULATION EXHIBITAUGUST 10, 2020IMAGE BOARDSEPTEMBER 03, 2020330
35'-0"39'-9"OPTIONAL OPENTRELLIS / PATIO5'-0"45'-0"50'-0"5'-0"5'-0"5'-0"25'-4"9'-8"10'-0"29'-9"40'-0"25'-0"15'-0"5'-10"9'-2"20'-0"35'-0"16'-6"8'-6"10'-0"DN.17R.35'-0"39'-9"25'-4"9'-8"10'-0"24'-2"38'-6"34'-2"4'-4"35'-0"17'-0"8'-0"10'-0"4'-4"1'-3"Architecture + Planning17911 Von Karman Ave,Suite 200Irvine, CA 92614949.851.2133ktgy.comPlot Date:June 9, 2020FERREE STREETSAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA # 2018-1065Warmington ResidentialSCALE: 1/4"=1'-0"A2.4024 8SAMPLE FLOOR PLAN 0A4.FEBRUARY 26, 202001 +\- 1400SFAUGUST 10, 2020SAMPLE FLOOR PLAN 1 - 1845 SFSEPTEMBER 03, 2020331
40'-0"5'-0"50'-0"50'-0"5'-0"5'-0"5'-0"33'-0"7'-0"22'-3"40'-0"27'-0"13'-0"18'-0"40'-0"12'-2"16'-0"11'-10"5'-0"1'-0"12'-9"40'-0"40'-0"20'-8"24'-3"22'-0"12'-0"40'-0"12'-0"16'-2"11'-10"3'-0"7'-0"12'-4"6'-0"12'-9"Architecture + Planning17911 Von Karman Ave,Suite 200Irvine, CA 92614949.851.2133ktgy.comPlot Date:June 9, 2020FERREE STREETSAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA # 2018-1065Warmington ResidentialSCALE: 1/4"=1'-0"A3.4024 8SAMPLE FLOOR PLAN0A4.FEBRUARY 26, 202012 +\- 1750SFSAMPLE FLOOR PLAN 2 - 1970 SFAUGUST 10, 2020SEPTEMBER 03, 2020332
44'-6"40'-0"5'-0"55'-0"50'-0"5'-0"5'-6"5'-0"30'-2"14'-4"25'-2"40'-0"21'-0"13'-0"18'-0"44'-6"29'-0"5'-2"10'-4"14'-10"6'-0"44'-6"40'-0"19'-10"14'-4"25'-2"40'-0"21'-0"13'-0"44'-6"29'-0"5'-2"10'-4"14'-10"6'-0"10'-4"6"6"Architecture + Planning17911 Von Karman Ave,Suite 200Irvine, CA 92614949.851.2133ktgy.comPlot Date:June 9, 2020FERREE STREETSAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA # 2018-1065Warmington ResidentialSCALE: 1/4"=1'-0"A4.4024 80SAMPLE FLOOR PLAN A4.FEBRUARY 26, 20203A +\- 1600SF2SAMPLE FLOOR PLAN 3 - 2045 SFAUGUST 10, 2020SEPTEMBER 03, 2020333
UpDownPlan 13 BD - 2.5 BA2002 SQ. FT.26'-0"61'-8"KitchenLau.MasterBathW.C.Coat10'-8"36'-10"14'-2"13'-0"13'-0"26'-0"61'-8"10'-8"15'-7"6'-0"13'-0"13'-0"15'-3"14'-3"27'-0"11'-8"11'-4"3'-0"Bath 2Pwd.P.Lin.FoyerPorchDining9'-11" X 14'-8"California Room12'-0" X 10'-0"Master Bedroom15'-0" X 15'-0"Living15'-6" X 14'-8"Bedroom 214'-1" X 11'-5"Bedroom 311'-1" X 13'-1"Garage20'-1" X 20'-1"Architecture + Planning888.456.5849ktgy.comSAN DIEGO COUNTRY CLUBCHULA VISTA, CA # 2018-0014SCHEMATIC DESIGNMARCH 07, 2018A2.0UNIT PLANPlan 1024 80SAMPLE FLOOR PLAN A4.FEBRUARY 26, 20203B +\- 1600SF3SAMPLE FLOOR PLAN DUPLEX +\- 1900-2000 SFAUGUST 10, 2020A4.326'-0"51'-0"26'-0"51'-0"SEPTEMBER 03, 2020334
25'-0"DRIVE AISLE10'-0"PARKING4'-0"WALKPLEXISTING ±6'SCREEN WALL4'-0"PLANTER"HEATHER GLEN"NEIGHBORHOODHOMEPROPOSEDDUPLEX HOME±25'-0"9'-1"9'-1"±25'-3" (29'-0" MAX.)OVERALL BUILDING HEIGHTT.O.PLATEF.F.T.O.PLATEFF=476.70GFF=476.00FG=475.00PROPOSED ±8'SCREEN WALL±18'-10"2ND FLOOR WINDOW HEIGHT±61'-3 1/2"F.F.FINISHED GRADETYP. LANDSCAPESCREENING±20'-0"Architecture + Planning17911 Von Karman Ave,Suite 200Irvine, CA 92614949.851.2133ktgy.com#MOORPARK - BELTRAMO RANCHMOORPARK, CA 2018-0860Warmington Residential3090 Pullman StreetCosta Mesa, CA 92626SECTION AT WESTERN PROPERTY LINE1KEY SITE PLAN - NTS024 8SITE SECTIONSSEPTEMBER 03, 20201335
9'-1"9'-1"±25'-3" (26'-0" MAX.)OVERALL BUILDING HEIGHTT.O.PLATEF.F.T.O.PLATEPROPOSED±8' SCREEN WALL25'-0"DRIVE AISLE51'-9 1/2"10'-0"DRIVEWAYEXISTINGNEIGHBORINGGUEST HOUSE4'-0"PLANTERPROPOSEDSINGLE-FAMILYDETACHED HOMEFL=478.50FS=478.75FL=478.50FG=479.10FS=478.80±12'-5 1/2"±15'-9 1/2"EXISTINGNEIGHBORINGHOME18'-10"2ND FLOOR WINDOW HEIGHTEXISTING FENCINGMAUREENLANE37'-8 1/2"F.F.FINISHED GRADEPLTYP. LANDSCAPESCREENING±20'-0"EXISTING FENCINGArchitecture + Planning17911 Von Karman Ave,Suite 200Irvine, CA 92614949.851.2133ktgy.com#MOORPARK - BELTRAMO RANCHMOORPARK, CA 2018-0860Warmington Residential3090 Pullman StreetCosta Mesa, CA 92626KEY SITE PLAN - NTS024 8SITE SECTIONSSEPTEMBER 03, 202011SECTION AT EASTERN PROPERTY LINE336
From:Nicole Hazz
To:Planning
Cc:Nicole Hazz
Subject:Beltramo Ranch Development
Date:Wednesday, September 16, 2020 4:35:24 PM
Hello my name is Nicole Hazz. My family has lived in Heather Glen for 23 years and prior to buying our own home
I was raised in my family home on Loretta Drive. We have many concerns about this neighborhood being squeezed
in between existing neighborhoods. We daily walk and ride bikes to and from our neighborhood to my parents
home. Our kids can safely ride or walk there to their grandparents home on Loretta Drive. The building of this
neighborhood will infringe on that ability. Neighbors throughout Heather Glen walk with their families through the
park and towards the path on the Arroyo every day. All this will be changed if a high density neighborhood is
allowed to squeeze in here. Not to mention the fact that both the Heather Glen community and all residents on
Maureen and Loretta will be infringed upon. It is not fair to build two story dwellings that will overlook all their
yards. The lights and noise alone of that many residents being crammed in there is absurd. All the Maureen Lane
and Loretta Drive properties are horse properties that as you know are known for their own issues of flies, dirt, dust
and noises. It is unfair to those home owners, many of whom are very long time owners, to change the landscape of
their neighborhoods. It saddens me that anyone would feel the need to squeeze in to a space that size with a housing
development. Next we have traffic. The traffic is horrendous as it is getting in and out of the few streets we have to
exit either of those neighborhoods. Exiting Maureen Lane is already tough even with the edition of the stop light
years ago. Also exiting Heather Glen on Either of the two streets is near impossible to make a left turn during any
traffic times. I would hope you would have some sense of care in considering the two neighborhoods you will
greatly impact in a very negative way. These are developed neighborhoods that have been there for 40 plus years, it
is really unfair to pack in two story buildings between them. Another thing is during a normal school year there are
many high school students that walk home from school and pass through the park and up either Beltramo or Loretta
to get to their neighborhoods providing them a safe route to get home. We ask that you please reconsider allowing a
neighborhood to be built that will completely change and affect the way the current owners have been able to live.
The horse property neighborhoods there are so wonderful and peaceful. I would really hate for them to have a
complete change of home life due to this development. Please put yourselves in the current residents place and if
you haven’t already go to the site and see that it really is not only not ideal it is a very poor decision to allow another
neighborhood to be squeezed in for traffic, privacy, noise, lighting infringement, park access and many other
reasons. Another thing when there has been emergency vehicles parked on Maureen Lane which in my over 40
years of living there or visiting my parents has happened many times we are able to exit through Beltramo if that
space is blocked. For the safety of all the neighborhoods involved I believe it is also dangerous to have that many
people with one exit in case of emergency evacuations. Thank you for your time, and please feel free to contact me
if you have any questions. Nicole Hazz 805-249-0025.
Sincerely, Nicole Hazz
Sent from my iPhone
ATTACHMENT 5
337
From:Yahoo
To:Planning
Subject:Re. General Plan Amendment Application for Proposed Beltramo Ranch Community
Date:Wednesday, September 16, 2020 4:58:05 PM
To: Moorpark Community & Economic Development Standing Committee
Councilmembers Roseann Mikos and David Pollack (cc: Mayor Janice Parvin, Councilmembers
Ken Simons and Chris Enegren)
Re. General Plan Amendment Application for Proposed Beltramo Ranch Community
Honorable Councilmembers Roseann Mikos and DavidPollack:
I wish to express my concerns about the proposed Beltramo Ranch development on Los Angeles
Avenue, which is adjacent to my HOA, Heather Glen, and the communities on Maureen Lane and
Loretta Drive. Granted, the Warmington Group have made some changes to the original plan, but
they are insufficient to satisfactorily address the issues that are causing me and many others the
most concern. These concerns include the following:
1. A development of this density doesn’t blend into either community’s character
2. Parking, still, despite the additional spaces that have appeared on the latest plan. Of
particular concern for the folks who live on Elderberry is the addition of 7 more spaces
against the perimeter wall since the last plan we were shown and the apparent removal of
promised green belt landscaping to accommodate these new spaces. The additional noise
and light pollution right outside bedroom windows is also a concern. Plus, there’s no street
parking and only 2-3 spaces per unit, so overflow parking in Heather Glen remains a very
real concern.
3. Increased chances of collisions associated with the single ingress from/egress to Hwy #118
, especially where the middle lane is being used for left hand turns.
4. Backup traffic for left hand turns onto Tierra Rejada from the #118.
5. Increased congestion on LA Avenue, which is already a huge headache during rush hours
and promises to become a real nightmare once the other approved developments on LA
Avenue are completed.
There are other objections that I and others have to this development, but almost all these
objections relate to trying to preserve the quality of life that we enjoy in our little slice of Moorpark.
Both my husband and I have lived in Moorpark our entire lives. We choose to continue to live here
for the calm lifestyle. We moved to the Heatherglen community for the serene and semi-rural
nature of the neighborhood. And, we want our neighbors on Maureen Lane and Loretta Drive to
be able to keep the unique, old Moorpark ambiance they enjoy as well. Allowing this development
to proceed will significantly change both our worlds.
As a citizen of Moorpark who loves this community and especially cherishes the ambiance and
character of the neighborhood I live in here, I urge the Committee and the Council to not approve
338
the General Plan Amendment requested by the Warmington Group. If the project appeals to you,
please find another parcel where it won’t impact the quality of life of people who have chosen their
homes for that very blessing.
Thank you,
Alyssa and Nick Chase
339
From:mira.dokic@L3Harris.com
To:Planning
Subject:Beltramo Ranch
Date:Thursday, September 17, 2020 7:48:48 AM
Attachments:image001.png
To: Moorpark Community & Economic Development Standing Committee
Councilmembers Roseann Mikos and David Pollack (cc: Mayor Janice Parvin, Councilmembers
Ken Simons and Chris Enegren)
Re. General Plan Amendment Application for Proposed Beltramo Ranch Community
Honorable Councilmembers Roseann Mikos and DavidPollack:
I wish to express my concerns about the proposed Beltramo Ranch development on Los Angeles
Avenue, which is adjacent to my HOA, Heather Glen, and the communities on Maureen Lane and
Loretta Drive. Granted, the Warmington Group have made some changes to the original plan, but
they are insufficient to satisfactorily address the issues that are causing me and many others the
most concern. These concerns include the following:
A development of this density doesn’t blend into either community’s character
Parking, still, despite the additional spaces that have appeared on the latest plan. Of particular
concern for the folks who live on Elderberry is the addition of 7 more spaces against the perimeter
wall since the last plan we were shown and the apparent removal of promised green belt
landscaping to accommodate these new spaces. The additional noise and light pollution right
outside bedroom windows is also a concern. Plus, there’s no street parking and only 2-3 spaces
per unit, so overflow parking in Heather Glen remains a very real concern.
Increased chances of collisions associated with the single ingress from/egress to Hwy #118 ,
especially where the middle lane is being used for left hand turns.
Backup traffic for left hand turns onto Tierra Rejada from the #118.
Increased congestion on LA Avenue, which is already a huge headache during rush hours and
promises to become a real nightmare once the other approved developments on LA Avenue are
completed.
There are other objections that I and others have to this development, but almost all these
objections relate to trying to preserve the quality of life that we enjoy in our little slice of Moorpark.
We moved here for the serene and semi-rural nature of Heather Glen at the outside edge of
Moorpark. And, we want our neighbors on Maureen Lane and Loretta Drive to be able to keep the
unique, old Moorpark ambiance they enjoy as well. Allowing this development to proceed will
significantly change both our worlds.
As a citizen of Moorpark who loves this community and especially cherishes the ambiance and
character of the neighborhood I live in here, I urge the Committee and the Council to not approve
the General Plan Amendment requested by the Warmington Group. If the project appeals to you,
please find another parcel where it won’t impact the quality of life of people who have chosen their
homes for that very blessing.
Thank you,
Mira Dokic
Software Engineering
SPACE & AIRBORNE SYSTEMS . L3HARRIS TECHNOLOGIES
7821 Orion Ave
340
Van Nuys, CA 91406
818-901-2481
mira.dokic@l3harris.com
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email and any attachments are for the sole use of the intended
recipient and may contain material that is proprietary, confidential, privileged or otherwise legally protected
or restricted under applicable government laws. Any review, disclosure, distributing or other use without
expressed permission of the sender is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact
the sender and delete all copies without reading, printing, or saving.
341
RESOLUTION NO. 2021-____
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA, REJECTING GENERAL PLAN
AMENDMENT REQUEST NO. 2019-02 TO CHANGE THE
GENERAL PLAN LAND USE DESIGNATION ON 7.4
ACRES OF PROPERTY LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST
CORNER OF LOS ANGELES AVENUE AND BELTRAMO
RANCH ROAD FROM LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (L),
HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (H) AND PARK (P) TO
VERY HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (VH) FOR
CONCEPTUAL DEVELOPMENT OF A 69-UNIT
RESIDENTIAL PROJECT, ON THE APPLICATION OF JAY
DECKARD (FOR WARMINGTON GROUP)
WHEREAS, Section 17.44.050(C) of the Moorpark Municipal Code requires the
pre-screening of General Plan Amendment applications requested by property owners
or the owner’s agent before an application can be accepted for review; and
WHEREAS, Resolution No. 2015-3466 establishes the process for the review of
General Plan Amendment Pre-Screening applications; and
WHEREAS, on November 21, 2019, Jay Deckard for Warmington Group
submitted an application for General Plan Amendment Pre-Screening No. 2019-02,
requesting a change in the land use designation from low density residential (l), high
density residential (H) and open space and recreation (P) to very high density
residential (VH) for the development of a 69-unit residential project located on 7.4 acres
of property at the southeast corner of Los Angeles Avenue and Beltramo Ranch Road;
and
WHEREAS, on May 13, 2020, the City Council allowed the review of the General
Plan Amendment Pre-Screening No. 2019-02 off-schedule, due to COVID-19, as
prescribed in Resolution No. 2015-3466; and
WHERAS on June 24, 2020, the Community and Economic Development
Committee reviewed General Plan Amendment Pre-Screening No. 2019-02, received
public comments, advised the applicant to consider a revised design that would address
neighborhood concerns and continued the request to the September 16, 2020,
Community and Economic Development Committee; and
WHEREAS on September 16, 2020, the Community and Economic Development
Committee continued review of General Plan Amendment Pre-Screening No. 2019-02,
which included a revised 69-unit conceptual design and recommended that the City
Council deny the acceptance of a General Plan Amendment application for this
proposal based on incompatibility with adjacent neighborhoods; and
ATTACHMENT 6
342
WHEREAS, at a duly noticed public hearing on January 6, 2021, the City Council
considered the agenda report and any supplements thereto and written public
comments; opened the public hearing and took and considered public testimony both
for and against the proposal; closed the public hearing and reached a decision on this
matter; and
WHEREAS, a General Plan Amendment Pre-Screening request is not a formal
development entitlement application and is therefore not subject to the California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The legislative action of this request is not
considered a Project, as defined by CEQA Section 15378 and would have no potential
for resulting in either a direct physical change in the environment, or a reasonably
foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTATION: The City Council
concurs with the determination that action on a General Plan Amendment Pre-
Screening application is not a project subject to the California Environmental Quality
Act.
SECTION 2. REJECTION OF GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT REQUEST:
Staff is hereby authorized to reject for review a General Plan Amendment Request No.
2019-02. In accordance with Section 17.44.060(0) of the Zoning Ordinance, no
resubmittal of a similar application may be made for one (1) year after a denial decision.
SECTION 3. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this resolution and
shall cause a certified resolution to be filed in the book of original resolutions.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 6th day of January, 2021.
______________________________
Janice S. Parvin, Mayor
ATTEST:
___________________________________
Ky Spangler, City Clerk
343
ATTACHMENT 7
RESOLUTION NO. 2021-____
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING GENERAL PLAN
AMENDMENT REQUEST NO. 2019-02 TO CHANGE THE
GENERAL PLAN LAND USE DESIGNATION ON 7.4
ACRES OF PROPERTY LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST
CORNER OF LOS ANGELES AVENUE AND BELTRAMO
RANCH ROAD FROM LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (L),
HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (H) AND PARK (P) TO
VERY HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (VH) FOR
CONCEPTUAL DEVELOPMENT OF A 69-UNIT
RESIDENTIAL PROJECT, ON THE APPLICATION OF JAY
DECKARD (FOR WARMINGTON GROUP)
WHEREAS, Section 17.44.050(C) of the Moorpark Municipal Code requires the
pre-screening of General Plan Amendment applications requested by property owners
or the owner’s agent before an application can be accepted for review; and
WHEREAS, Resolution No. 2015-3466 establishes the process for the review of
General Plan Amendment Pre-Screening applications; and
WHEREAS, on November 21, 2019, Jay Deckard for Warmington Group
submitted an application for General Plan Amendment Pre-Screening No. 2019-02,
requesting a change in the land use designation from low density residential (l), high
density residential (H) and open space and recreation (P) to very high density
residential (VH) for the development of a 69-unit residential project located on 7.4 acres
of property at the southeast corner of Los Angeles Avenue and Beltramo Ranch Road;
and
WHEREAS, on May 13, 2020, the City Council allowed the review of the General
Plan Amendment Pre-Screening No. 2019-02 off-schedule, due to COVID-19, as
prescribed in Resolution No. 2015-3466; and
WHERAS on June 24, 2020, the Community and Economic Development
Committee reviewed General Plan Amendment Pre-Screening No. 2019-02, received
public comments, advised the applicant to consider a revised design that would address
neighborhood concerns and continued the request to the September 16, 2020,
Community and Economic Development Committee; and
WHEREAS on September 16, 2020, the Community and Economic Development
Committee continued review of General Plan Amendment Pre-Screening No. 2019-02,
which included a revised 69-unit conceptual design and recommended that the City
Council deny the acceptance of a General Plan Amendment application for this
proposal based on incompatibility with adjacent neighborhoods; and
344
WHEREAS, at a duly noticed public hearing on January 6, 2021, the City Council
considered the agenda report and any supplements thereto and written public
comments; opened the public hearing and took and considered public testimony both
for and against the proposal; closed the public hearing and reached a decision on this
matter; and
WHEREAS, a General Plan Amendment Pre-Screening request is not a formal
development entitlement application and is therefore not subject to the California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The legislative action of this request is not
considered a Project, as defined by CEQA Section 15378 and would have no potential
for resulting in either a direct physical change in the environment, or a reasonably
foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTATION: The City Council
concurs with the determination that action on a General Plan Amendment Pre-
Screening application is not a project subject to the California Environmental Quality
Act.
SECTION 2. ACCEPTANCE OF GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT REQUEST:
Staff is hereby authorized to accept for review a General Plan Amendment Request No.
2019-02.
SECTION 3. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this resolution and
shall cause a certified resolution to be filed in the book of original resolutions.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 6th day of January, 2021.
______________________________
Janice S. Parvin, Mayor
ATTEST:
___________________________________
Ky Spangler, City Clerk
345