HomeMy WebLinkAboutAGENDA REPORT 2021 0407 CCSA REG ITEM 08A v
ilipww.4'
Alto" ...
0. ajori,,
4IPr
NOTICE OF CONTINUANCE OF PUBLIC HEARING
Duly noticed public hearing regarding:
Consider a Resolution to Modify Conditions of Approval of a Previously-
Approved Industrial Development Located at 5850 Condor Drive Requiring
All Utilities to be Placed Underground and to Permit the Installation of
Skylights, and Making a Determination of Exemption Pursuant to the
California Environmental Quality Act in Connection Therewith, on the
Application of Paul Minoo (4M Investment Corporation). Staff
Recommendation: 1) Open the public hearing, accept public testimony
and close the public hearing; and 2) Adopt Resolution No. 2021-
approving Modification No. 1 to IPD No. 2019-01 and CUP No. 2020-02,
subject to the conditions of approval contained therein, and allowing one
utility pole to be relocated on-site and two poles to be placed underground
and allowing skylights on the rooftop of the previously-approved
development.
The Moorpark City Council meeting and public hearing referenced above scheduled on April
7, 2021, was held at which time the City Council continued the open public hearing to a date
uncertain. Noticing for a new public hearing will be published at such time as the item is
rescheduled for consideration.
Posted: April 8, 2021.
,(, ),_—_.A0-,,,_____
Blanca Garza, Deputy City Clerk
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF VENTURA ) ss
CITY OF MOORPARK )
AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING
I, Blanca Garza, declare as follows:
That I am the Deputy City Clerk of the City of Moorpark and that a Notice of Continuance of
Open Public Hearing regarding:
Consider a Resolution to Modify Conditions of Approval of a Previously-Approved
Industrial Development Located at 5850 Condor Drive Requiring All Utilities to be
Placed Underground and to Permit the Installation of Skylights, and Making a
Determination of Exemption Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act
in Connection Therewith, on the Application of Paul Minoo (4M Investment
Corporation). Staff Recommendation: 1) Open the public hearing, accept public
testimony and close the public hearing; and 2) Adopt Resolution No. 2021-
approving Modification No. 1 to IPD No. 2019-01 and CUP No. 2020-02, subject
to the conditions of approval contained therein, and allowing one utility pole to be
relocated on-site and two poles to be placed underground and allowing skylights
on the rooftop of the previously-approved development.
Was continued from April 7, 2021, to a date uncertain, was posted on April 8,
2021, at a conspicuous location near the place of the meeting:
Moorpark Community Center
799 Moorpark Avenue
Moorpark, California
I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.
Executed on April 8, 2021.
Blanca Garza, Deputy City Clerk
CITY OF MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA
City Council Meeting
of April 07, 2021
ACTION Continued Open Public Hearing to
a Date Uncertain, at the Request of the
Applicant. (Roll Call Vote: Unanimous).
BY B.Garza.
A. Consider a Resolution to Modify Conditions of Approval of a Previously-Approved
Industrial Development Located at 5850 Condor Drive Requiring All Utilities to be
Placed Underground and to Permit the Installation of Skylights, and Making a
Determination of Exemption Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act
in Connection Therewith, on the Application of Paul Minoo (4M Investment
Corporation). Staff Recommendation: 1) Open the public hearing, accept public
testimony and close the public hearing; and 2) Adopt Resolution No. 2021-____
approving Modification No. 1 to IPD No. 2019-01 and CUP No. 2020-02, subject
to the conditions of approval contained therein, and allowing one utility pole to be
relocated on-site and two poles to be placed underground and allowing skylights
on the rooftop of the previously-approved development. (ROLL CALL VOTE
REQUIRED) (Staff: Freddy Carrillo)
Item: 8.A.
Item: 8.A.
MOORPARK CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA REPORT
TO: Honorable City Council
FROM: Freddy A. Carrillo, Associate Planner ll
DATE: 04/07/2021 Regular Meeting
SUBJECT: Consider a Resolution to Modify Conditions of Approval of a
Previously-Approved Industrial Development Located at 5850 Condor
Drive Requiring All Utilities to be Placed Underground and to Permit
the Installation of Skylights, and Making a Determination of Exemption
Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act in Connection
Therewith, on the Application of Paul Minoo (4M Investment
Corporation)
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
On February 1, 2021, Paul Minoo (for 4M Investment Corporation) (Applicant) filed an
application to modify conditions of approval of a previously-approved industrial
development project at 5850 Condor Drive requiring all utilities to be placed underground
and to permit the installation of skylights. Both conditions of approval are set forth in
Resolution No. 2009-2799 adopted by the City Council on March 18, 2009.
Standard Condition of Approval No. 145:
Prior to issuance of the first building permit, all existing and proposed utilities,
including electrical transmission lines less than 67Kv, must be under-grounded
consistent with plans approved by the City Engineer, Public Works Director and
Community Development Director. Any exceptions must be approved by the City
Council.
Standard Condition of Approval No. 43:
Skylights are prohibited unless approved through the Planned Development
Permit process or as a Modification to the Planned Development Permit. (This
Condition Applies to Commercial/Industrial and Multi-family Residential Projects.)
1
Honorable City Council
04/07/2021 Regular Meeting
Page 2
The Moorpark Municipal Code allows for a Permit Modification for any proposed change
to a discretionary permit that exceeds the criteria of a permit adjustment but is not
extensive enough to be considered a substantial or fundamental change in the approved
entitlement or use relative to the permit, would not have a substantial adverse impact on
surrounding properties and would not change any findings contained in the environmental
documentation prepared for the permit. The decision on the permit modification shall be
by the decision-making body that approved the original permit, in this case the City
Council.
BACKGROUND
On November 13, 2019, Mr. Minoo filed an application for an Industrial Planned
Development (IPD) to develop a 48,787 square-foot, single story industrial building and
associated site improvements on a 3.46-acre site at 5850 Condor Drive. The building
features contemporary industrial architecture with two separate entry ways to provide the
property owner the opportunity to subdivide the space in the future and lease the building
to two tenants. The project also provides associated public and private improvements,
including a parking lot with 116 parking spaces, four truck loading spaces, landscaping,
and other improvements.
The request also included a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) to allow the proposed building
height above the maximum height permitted within the Industrial Park (M-1) zone. In
addition, the Applicant submitted a request for the City to fund $469,398 for the
undergrounding of on-site and off-site utility poles. A copy of the site plan is included as
Attachment 3.
On July 15, 2020, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2020-3935 (Attachment 4),
approving IPD No. 2019-01 and CUP No. 2020-02 for the development of the industrial
development. However, the Council was not in favor of providing City funds to offset the
costs for undergrounding utility poles. The Council discussed a variety of options that the
Applicant could consider as an alternative to City funding, which might include a revised
undergrounding plan or the formation of a Community Facilities District to provide a more
accurate fair-share, pro-rata cost to the Applicant. Although the Council discussed
options that might provide financial relief for the Applicant, the Council requested that this
item return for further consideration once the Applicant worked with Southern California
Edison (SCE) and City Staff to determine a viable solution that minimized the
undergrounding of off-site poles. As a result, the Council denied the Applicant’s funding
request. A copy of the Staff Report is included as Attachment 5.
DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
There are three existing wooden utility poles on the project site that serve transmission
lines that are less than 67Kv and are therefore required to be undergrounded by Standard
Condition of Approval No. 145. However, if that occurs, SCE requires the Applicant to
underground one additional off-site pole located on the southeast corner of Condor Drive
and Virginia Colony Place. This is necessary because the removal of the three on-site
poles would require the Virginia Colony pole to be supported by a new guy wire. There
2
Honorable City Council
04/07/2021 Regular Meeting
Page 3
is not sufficient room in the proximity of the pole to safely locate the guy wire, therefore
this pole must be undergrounded as well. This option is further referred to as the “four-
pole” plan.
Undergrounding Utilities
The California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) Undergrounding Program outlines
policies and procedures for the conversion of overhead utility lines and equipment to
underground facilities. Referred to as Rule 20, the CPUC policies and procedures also
outline who is responsible for paying certain costs related to undergrounding. Rule 20
determines the level of ratepayer funding for different undergrounding arrangements and
indicates if a project will receive public funds or otherwise require private funding. Rule
20 is broken into three categories that could apply in Moorpark: Rule 20A, Rule 20B, and
Rule 20C.
• Rule 20A projects are those that are paid for fully by the customers and ratepayers
and not privately by a specific developer. Rule 20A undergrounding projects are
typically located in the public realm and serve a public interest, such as in scenic
areas and must be nominated by the local jurisdiction for consideration.
• Rule 20B projects are those that are partially funded by public funds, where funds
subsidize the cost of the undergrounding. Such projects do not qualify for Rule
20A, but meet other minimum criteria, for example the project should involve both
sides of a street and underground lines for a minimum of 600 feet. Rule 20B
projects typically receive 20 to 40 percent reimbursement.
• Rule 20C projects bear the full cost of undergrounding and receive only a small
credit for salvage costs of facilities that do not move underground.
The project’s initial undergrounding plan to remove four poles would have qualified as a
Rule 20C project, requiring the developer to bear the full cost for undergrounding. The
preliminary cost estimate from SCE for this Rule 20C Project is $193,317. In order to
receive a final actual cost from SCE, the Applicant would need to pay additional fees to
SCE for the design work. The Applicant’s contractor is also responsible to perform some
work associated with the undergrounding of utilities. The Applicant provided a cost
estimate of $585,000 for this additional work. The total preliminary cost of undergrounding
the four utility poles would be approximately $778,317. A final cost estimate has not been
generated for this scenario.
The Applicant had the option to remove an additional off-site utility pole and guy pole on
Princeton Avenue north of the project site in addition to the three on-site poles and one
off-site pole at Condor Drive and Virginia Colony Place. Doing so would qualify the project
for Rule 20B. Rule 20B projects qualify for SCE credit and are less expensive to the
Applicant. The actual cost from SCE for a proposed five pole scope of work (three on-
site and two off-site) Rule 20B Project is $109,398. The Applicant has also indicated that
the work performed by the contractor would have the same cost estimate of $585,000.
The total cost of undergrounding the five utility poles would be approximately $694,398.
This option is further referred to as the “five-pole” plan.
3
Honorable City Council
04/07/2021 Regular Meeting
Page 4
Applicant’s Request
The diagram below summarizes the optional pole plans and cost and location of existing
utility poles. The Applicant is now requesting to relocate the on-site utility pole (No. 2) on
the southwest corner of the project site approximately 38-feet south from its current
location and undergrounding the two remaining on-site utility poles (Nos. 3 and 4) to the
north. Additionally, SCE is requiring the Applicant to relocate the off-site pole north of the
project site (No. 5) approximately five feet east into an existing landscaped area and
remove the guy wire across the street on Princeton Avenue (No. 6). This scope of work
would qualify for Rule 20C and would be approximately $421,269 paid for entirely by the
Applicant. This plan is referred to as the “two-pole plan”. The Applicant’s request letter
is included as Attachment 6.
Due to site constraints limiting the ability to underground all three on-site poles, which
require additional undergrounding of off-site poles, the proposed two-pole plan would
provide appropriate public benefit improving the aesthetics of the project site’s street
frontage and allowing future improvements beyond the project site to benefit from the
Applicant’s undergrounding. The two-pole plan would not require public funding from the
City of Moorpark and all costs would be paid by the Applicant. The remaining on-site
4
Honorable City Council
04/07/2021 Regular Meeting
Page 5
pole, located near the corner of Princeton Avenue and Condor Avenue, would be located
near the southwest corner of the site, within a landscaped area and would not impact the
onsite parking or circulation (Attachment 7). The two-pole plan would not have a
significant negative impact on the aesthetic quality of the project site.
Current Standard Condition of Approval No. 145:
Prior to issuance of the first building permit, all existing and proposed utilities,
including electrical transmission lines less than 67Kv, must be under-grounded
consistent with plans approved by the City Engineer, Public Works Director and
Community Development Director. Any exceptions must be approved by the City
Council.
Proposed Special Condition of Approval No. 40:
Prior to issuance of grading permit, the Applicant shall submit revised plans
depicting the undergrounding of two on-site poles and the relocation of the
southerly most on-site pole consistent with approved plans. Any further exceptions
must be reviewed and approved by the City Council. Special Condition No. 40
supersedes Standard Condition of Approval No. 145.
Skylights
The Applicant is also requesting waiver of Standard Condition of Approval No. 43 that
prohibits the use of skylights on the project site. The Applicant proposes to install 37 roof-
mounted skylights, as shown on the roof plan (Attachment 8). Generally, projects are
prohibited from installing skylights through the application of Standard Conditions of
Approval.
Skylights provide an opportunity for the project to achieve daylighting requirements of the
interior spaces of the building, complying with Green Building Code and providing cost
and energy saving benefits to the future tenant(s). In this circumstance, the skylights also
act as emergency smoke ventilation, as they can be opened or triggered to allow
ventilation of the building in case of a fire. The skylights would be completely screened
from view off-site by a roof parapet, which stands roughly three feet taller than the roof
surface, with the skylights standing roughly two- and one-half feet above the roof. The
roof parapet would screen the proposed skylights from nearby rights-of-way and adjacent
properties. Although glare or light spillover may be a concern arising from use of
skylights, the project site is heavily screened from view of nearby residential and industrial
uses by existing established Sycamore and Pine trees. The project also includes a
landscape plan that provides numerous new trees that would provide additional screening
of the site from nearby areas. In addition, the Applicant has indicated that the building
uses fewer interior lights due to the incorporation of skylights and therefore potential
offsite lighting concerns would be minimal. Lastly, although the Standard Condition of
Approval prohibiting skylights has been applied to numerous projects, several existing
developments in the vicinity have skylights and have not resulted in complaints or
identified concerns.
5
Honorable City Council
04/07/2021 Regular Meeting
Page 6
Current Standard Condition of Approval No. 43:
Skylights are prohibited unless approved through the Planned Development
Permit process or as a Modification to the Planned Development Permit. (This
Condition Applies to Commercial/Industrial and Multi-family Residential Projects.)
Proposed Special Condition of Approval No. 41:
Skylights are permitted consistent with plans approved by the City Engineer, Public
Works Director and Community Development Director. Special Condition No. 41
supersedes Standard Condition of Approval No. 43.
NOTICING
Public Notice for this meeting was given consistent with Chapter 17.44.070 of the Zoning
Ordinance as follows:
1. Publication. The notice of the public hearing was published in the Ventura County
Star on March 28, 2021.
2. Mailing. The notice of the public hearing was mailed on March 26, 2021, to owners
of real property, as identified on the latest adjusted Ventura County Tax Assessor
Roles, within one-thousand (1,000) feet of the exterior boundaries of the
assessor’s parcel(s) subject to the hearing.
3. Sign. Two 32 square-foot sign were placed on the street frontage on March 28,
2021.
PROCESSING TIME LIMITS
Time limits have been established for the processing of development projects under the
Permit Streamlining Act (Government Code Title 7, Division 1, Chapter 4.5), the
Subdivision Map Act (Government Code Title 7, Division 2), and the California
Environmental Quality Act Statutes and Guidelines (Public Resources Code Division 13,
and California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Chapter 3). Under the applicable provisions
of these regulations, the following timelines have been established for action on this
project:
Date Application Submitted: February 01, 2021
Date Application Determined Complete: February 23, 2021
City Council Action Deadline: May 23, 2021
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
In accordance with the City’s environmental review procedures adopted by resolution, the
Community Development Director or designee determines the level of review necessary
for a project to comply with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Some
projects may be exempt from review based upon a specific category listed in CEQA.
Other projects may be exempt under a general rule that environmental review is not
6
Honorable City Council
04/07/2021 Regular Meeting
Page 7
necessary where it can be determined that there would be no possibility of a significant
effect upon the environment. A project which does not qualify for an exemption requires
the preparation of an Initial Study to assess the level of potential environmental impacts.
The Community Development Director has determined that this project, as amended by
Modification No. 1, is consistent with the environmental determination for IPD No. 2019-
01 and CUP No. 2020-02 and, furthermore, that Modification No. 1 is exempt from
environmental review pursuant to Section 15301 (Class 1: Existing Facilities) of the
California Environmental Quality Act because the request is limited to the undergrounding
of publicly-owned utilities and the addition of skylights to a previously-approved
development. Therefore, no further environmental documentation is required.
COUNCIL GOAL COMPLIANCE
This action does not support a current strategic directive.
FISCAL IMPACT
There are no fiscal impacts associated with this request.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION (ROLL CALL VOTE REQUIRED)
1. Open the public hearing, accept public testimony and close the public hearing; and
2. Adopt Resolution No. 2021-____ approving Modification No. 1 to IPD No. 2019-01
and CUP No. 2020-02, subject to the conditions of approval contained therein, and
allowing one utility pole to be relocated on-site and two poles to be placed
underground and allowing skylights on the rooftop of the previously-approved
development.
Attachment 1: Location Map
Attachment 2: Aerial Map
Attachment 3: Approved Site Plan: 5850 Condor Drive
Attachment 4: Resolution No. 2020-3935, Approving IPD No. 2019-01 and CUP No.
2020-02
Attachment 5: City Council Staff Report, Dated July 15, 2020
Attachment 6: Request from Mr. Paul Minoo, Dated February 1, 2021
Attachment 7: Proposed “Undergrounding of Utilities” Site Plan: 5850 Condor Drive
Attachment 8: Proposed “Skylights” Roof Plan: 5850 Condor Drive
Attachment 9: Draft Resolution with Special Conditions of Approval
7
Location Map ATTACHMENT 1
8
Aerial Map ATTACHMENT 2
9
ATTACHMENT 3
10
RESOLUTION NO. 2020-3935
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
MOORPARK, APPROVING INDUSTRIAL PLANNED
DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 2019-01 AND CONDITIONAL USE
PERMIT NO. 2020-02 FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF A 48, 787
SQUARE-FOOT, SINGLE-STORY INDUSTRIAL BUILDING AND
ASSOCIATED SITE IMPROVEMENTS ON AN UNDEVELOPED
3.46-ACRE SITE AT 5850 CONDOR DRIVE, AND MAKING A
DETERMINATION OF EXEMPTION UNDER CEQA IN
CONNECTION THEREWITH, AND DENYING THE REQUEST TO
FUND COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE UNDERGROUNDING
OF UTILITIES, ON THE APPLICATION OF PAUL MINOO FOR 4M
INVESTMENT CORPORATION
WHEREAS, on November 13, 2019, an application was filed for Industrial
Planned Development (IPD) Permit No. 2019-01 and Conditional Use Permit ( CUP)
No. 2020-02 for the development of a 48,787 square-foot, single-story industrial building
and associated site improvement on an undeveloped 3.46-acre site at 5850 Condor
Drive; and submitted a funding request to the City of $469,398.00 for costs associated
with the undergrounding of utilities pursuant to the Southern California Edison Rule 20b
scenario; and
WHEREAS, on June 2, 2020, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution
No. 2020-650, recommending to the City Council conditional approval of Industrial
Planned Development No. 2019-01 and Conditional Use Permit No. 2020-02, with no
consideration of the funding request; and
WHEREAS, at a duly noticed public hearing on July 15, 2020, the City Council
considered the agenda report for Industrial Planned Development No. 2019-01 and
Conditional Use Permit No. 2020-02 and any supplements thereto and written public
comments; opened the public hearing and took and considered public testimony both
for and against the proposal; and reached a decision on this matter; and
WHEREAS, the Community Development Department has determined that IPD
No. 2019-01 and CUP No. 2020-02 is categorically exempt from the provisions of the
California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 15332 (Class 32: In-
fill Development Projects) of the CEQA Guidelines.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK,
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTATION: The City Council, based
on its own independent analysis and judgment, concurs with the Community
Development Director's determination that the project is categorically exempt from the
requirements of CEQA pursuant to Section 15332 (Class 32: In-Fill Development
Projects) of the CEQA Guidelines. The proposed building is consistent with the General
Plan and Zoning regulations. In addition, there is no substantial evidence that the
ATTACHMENT 4
11
Resolution No. 2020-3935
Page 2
project will have a significant effect on the environment in that the site will be developed
with associated site improvements. No further environmental documentation is needed.
SECTION 2. PLANNED DEVELOPMENT FINDINGS: Based upon the
information set forth in the staff report(s), accompanying studies, and oral and written
public testimony, the City Council makes the following findings in accordance with City
of Moorpark, Municipal Code Section 17.44.040:
1. The site design, including structure location, size, height, setbacks, massing,
scale, architectural style and colors, and landscaping, is consistent with the goals
and policies of the City's General Plan and Zoning Ordinance, as described in
the staff report and attachments thereto in that the building design features a
contemporary industrial architecture that includes concrete tilt-up panels with
rectangular tinted clerestory windows and roll-up truck doors. The scale of the
building is compatible with the surrounding business campus directly adjacent to
the project site.
2. The site design would not create negative impacts on or impair the utility of
properties, structures or uses in the surrounding area in that the building height
of 41-feet and 6-inches is generally consistent with the height of the existing
industrial buildings in the vicinity. In addition, the building is below the grade level
of the adjacent lot.
3. The proposed use is compatible with existing and permitted uses in the
surrounding area in that suitable uses, such as, light industrial services, technical
research and business office would be permitted under the Industrial Park (M-1)
Zoning designation.
SECTION 3. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FINDINGS: Based upon the
information set forth in the staff report(s), accompanying studies, and oral and written
public testimony, the City Council makes the following findings in accordance with City
of Moorpark, Municipal Code Section 17.44.040:
1. The proposed use is consistent with the provisions of the General Plan, zoning
ordinance, and other applicable regulations; in that Table 17.24.031 of the City
Code allows a maximum building height of 60-feet within the Industrial Park (M-1)
zone with an approved CUP.
2. The proposed use is compatible with both existing and permitted land uses in the
surrounding area, in that the proposed building height of 41-feet and 6-inches is
common in the existing business campus.
The proposed use is compatible with the scale, visual character, and design of
surrounding properties, in that the proposed building height is appropriate for the
architecture of the building and consistent with the adjacent industrial buildings.
12
Resolution No. 2020-3935
Page 3
3 . The proposed use would not be obnoxious or harmful, or impair the utility of
neighboring property or uses, in that the proposed building is below the grade
level from the adjacent lot; therefore, the visual impact of the proposed building is
minor and would not present any impacts on adjoining uses.
4. The proposed use would not be detrimental to the public health, safety,
convenience, or welfare , in that the project is substantially consistent with
existing industrial development in the vicinity, includes sufficient loading and on-
site parking facilities, and will be designed to comply with all applicable codes
and regulations.
SECTION 4. CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL: The City Council approves
Industrial Planned Development No. 2019-01 and Conditional Use Permit No. 2020 -02,
subject to the Standard and Special Conditions of Approval included in Exhibit A,
attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference.
SECTION 5. CITY COUNCIL DENIAL: The City Council denies the Applicant's
funding request of $469,398.00 for costs associated with the undergrounding of utilities
pursuant to the Southern California Edison Rule 20b scenario.
SECTION 6. CERTIFICATE OF ADOPTION: the City Clerk sha ll certify to the
adoption of this resolution and shall cause a certified resolution to be filed in the book or
original resolutions.
PASSED, AND ADOPTED this 15th day of July, 2020.
ATTEST:
13
Resolution No. 2020-3935
Page 4
EXHIBIT A
STANDARD AND SPECIAL CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
FOR INDUSTRIAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 2019-01
AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2020-02
STANDARD CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
The applicant shall comply with Standard Conditions of Approval for Subdivisions and
Planned Developments as adopted by City Council Resolution No. 2009-2799 (Exhibit
A), except as modified by the following Special Conditions of Approval. In the event of
conflict between a Standard and Special Condition of Approval, the Special Condition
shall apply.
SPECIAL CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
1. The applicant's acceptance of this permit and/or commencement of construction
and/or operations under this permit is deemed to be acceptance of all conditions
of this permit.
2. The Conditions of Approval of this permit, City of Moorpark Municipal Code and
adopted city policies at the time of the permit approval supersede all conflicting
notations, specifications, dimensions, typical sections and the like which may be
shown on plans.
3. Industrial Planned Development No. 2019-01 and Conditional Use Permit No.
2020-02 expire one (1) year from the date of its approval unless the use has
been inaugurated by issuance of a building permit for construction. The
Community Development Director may, at his/her discretion, grant up to two (2)
additional one-year extensions for use inauguration of the development permit, if
there have been no changes in the adjacent areas and if the applicant can
document that he/she has diligently worked towards use inauguration during the
initial period of time. The request for extension of this planned development
permit must be made in writing, at least thirty (30) days prior to the expiration
date of the permit and must be accompanied by applicable entitlement
processing deposits.
4. Conditions of this entitlement may not be interpreted as permitting or requiring
any violation of law or any unlawful rules or regulations or orders of an authorized
governmental agency.
5. The applicant shall defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City and its agents,
officers and employees from any claim, action or proceeding against the City or
its agents, officers or employees to attack, set aside, void, or annul any approval
by the City or any of its agencies, departments, commissions, agents, officers, or
14
Resolution No. 2020-3935
Page 5
employees concerning the permit, which claim, action or proceeding is brought
within the time period provided by the California Code of Civil Procedure Section
1094.6 and Government Code Section 65009. The City will promptly notify the
applicant of any such claim, action or proceeding, and if the City should fail to do
so or should fail to cooperate fully in the defense, the applicant shall not
thereafter be responsible to defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City or its
agents, officers and employees pursuant to this condition.
a. The City may, within its unlimited discretion, participate in the defense of
any such claim, action or proceeding, if both of the following occur:
i. The City bears its own attorney fees and costs; and
ii. The City defends the claim, action or proceeding in good faith.
b. The applicant shall not be required to pay or perform any settlement of
such claim, action or proceeding unless the settlement is approved by the
applicant. The applicant's obligations under this condition shall apply
regardless of whether a building permit is ultimately obtained, or final
occupancy is ultimately granted with respect to the permit.
6. If any of the conditions or limitations of this approval are held to be invalid, that
holding shall not invalidate any of the remaining conditions or limitations set forth.
7. The development must be in substantial conformance with the plans presented in
conjunction with the application for Industrial Planned Development No. 2019-01
and Conditional Use Permit No. 2020-02, except any modifications as may be
required to meet specific Code standards or other conditions stipulated herein.
Any future changes to the parking layout shall require review and approval as
determined by the Community Development Director consistent with Chapter
17.44 of the Zoning Ordinance.
8. Industrial Planned Development No. 2019-01 and Conditional Use Permit No.
2020-02 are granted or approved with the City's designated approving body
retaining and reserving the right and jurisdiction to review and to modify the
permit-including the conditions of approval-based on changed circumstances.
Changed circumstances include, but are not limited to, major modification of the
business; a change in scope, emphasis, size, or nature of the business; the
expansion, alteration, reconfiguration, or change of use; or the fact that the use is
negatively impacting surrounding uses by virtue of impacts not identified at the
time of application for the conditional use permit or impacts that are much greater
than anticipated or disclosed at the time of application for the conditional use
permit. The reservation of right to review any permit granted or approved under
this chapter by the City's designated approving body is in addition to, and not in
lieu of, the right of the City, its Planning Commission, City Council and
designated approving body to review and revoke or modify any permit granted or
15
Resolution No. 2020-3935
Page 6
approved under this chapter for any violations of the conditions imposed on such
permit.
9. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall submit a lighting and
landscaping plan for review and approval by the Community Development
Director, Parks and Recreation Director, and Police Chief that demonstrates
compliance with the City's Zoning Ordinance, Landscape Standards and
Guidelines, and Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance, and provides a safe and
secure environment for the building occupants.
10. Prior to the issuance of a Zoning Clearance for occupancy, the applicant shall
submit a Developer Waste Reduction and Recycling Plan to the satisfaction of
the Program Manager.
11. All necessary permits must be obtained from the Building and Safety Division
and all construction shall be in compliance with the Moorpark Building Code and
all other applicable regulations.
12. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall provide a sample of
the glass to be used, along with the manufacturer's specifications for exterior
reflectance, for review and approval by the Community Development Director.
13. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, a Lot Merger application for Assessor
Parcel Nos.: 513-0-060-175, 513-0-060-185, and 513-0-060-315 must be
completed and recorded.
14. Parking areas must be developed and maintained in compliance with the
Moorpark Municipal Code, and surfaced with asphalt, concrete, or other surface
acceptable to the Community Development Director, City Engineer/Public Works
Director, and must include adequate provisions for drainage, National Pollution
Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) compliance, striping and appropriate
wheel blocks or curbs in parking areas adjacent to landscaped areas. All parking
space striping must be maintained to be clearly visible during the life of the
development.
15. A separate sign permit application is required for all proposed signs, which are
subject to the review and approval of the Community Development Director.
16. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall submit all fees,
including, but not limited to Los Angeles Avenue Area of Contribution Fee, Air
Quality Fee, Tree and Landscape Fee, Fire Protection Facilities Fee, Police
Facilities Fee, and Library Facilities Fee. All entitlement processing fees must be
paid in full prior to the issuance of a building permit.
16
Resolution No. 2020-3935
Page 7
17. Prior to issuance of a building permit, applicant shall either submit an in-lieu art
fee or indicate a location for on-site public art in compliance with Chapter 17.50
of the Zoning Ordinance. If on-site public art is approved, it must be installed and
completed prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy.
18. Prior to issuance of building permits, Developer shall revise the proposed west
elevation ( along Princeton Avenue) to provide additional architectural
enhancements, subject to the approval of the Community Development Director.
19. Prior to issuance of grading and building permits, Developer shall revise plans to
provide fiber cabling, underground conduit, and other appropriate equipment with
the latest technology available to ensure that all structures intended for human
occupancy are prepared to connect to broadband high-speed internet and
communication services.
Engineering I Public Works
20. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, provide street improvement plans, including
all profiles, for Princeton Avenue and Condor Drive. Street improvement plans
shall include all improvements within the existing and proposed right-of-way (curb
and gutter, sidewalk, parkways, driveways, etc.).
21. Provide site improvement plans, including grading and drainage, site utilities,
storm drainage infrastructure, sewer, domestic water, irrigation water, fire water,
etc.
22. Provide a Hydrology and Hydraulic Report, prepared by a State of California
Licensed Civil Engineer. Peak storm water runoff mitigation shall comply with
Ventura County Design Hydrology Manual and no developed peak condition shall
exceed the 10-year developed condition.
23. Provide a revised Storm Water Quality Report, prepared by a State of California
Licensed Civil Engineer. Report formatting shall follow the County's Technical
Guidance Manual for Storm Water Quality Measures.
24. All proposed storm water quality BMPs shall comply with the most current MS4
permit.
25. Provide Storm Water Quality Operations and Maintenance Manual and
Covenant.
26. Provide street dedication and/or easement documents for consideration to the
satisfaction of the City Engineer/Public Works Director.
27. Provide water and sewer improvement plans for reference.
17
Resolution No. 2020-3935
Page 8
28. Applicant shall install "full-capture" trash excluders approved by the California
State Water Resources Control Board for compliance with the State's Trash
Policy (State Water Resources Control Board Resolution No. 2015-0019) in all
storm drains. Flow capacity calculations showing compliance with the 1-year, 1-
hour minimum flow design criteria and applicable bypass sizing shall be identified
on Plans and submitted to the City Engineer for review and approval prior to
installation. An ongoing Operations and Maintenance Plan shall also be
submitted to the City Engineer for review.
29. Project will provide street and frontage improvements along Princeton Avenue.
Such frontage improvements include replacing an existing transiUbus shelter with
a new one, to the satisfaction of the City's Transit Program Manager.
Additionally, the street improvements along Princeton Avenue shall include a bus
turnout for the new transiUbus shelter, per Ventura County Road Standards.
Ventura County Fire Protection District (VCFPD)
30. Access Road Width, Private Roads/Driveways -Private roads shall comply
with Public Road Standards.
31. Construction Access -Prior to combustible construction, a paved all-weather
access road I driveway suitable for use by a 20 ton Fire District vehicle shall be
installed at locations approved by the Fire District.
32. Construction Access Utilities -Prior to combustible construction, all utilities
located within the access road and the first lift of the access road pavement shall
be installed. A minimum 20 foot clear width shall remain free of obstruction
during any construction activities within the development once combustible
construction starts.
33. Access Road Location -The access I driveway shall be extended to within 150
feet of all portions of the exterior walls of the first story of any building and shall
be in accordance with Fire District access standards. Where the access roadway
cannot be provided, approved fire protection system or systems shall be installed
as required and acceptable to the Fire District.
34. Fire Lanes -Prior to construction, the applicant shall submit two (2) site plans to
the Fire District for approval of the location of fire lanes. Prior to occupancy, all
fire lanes shall be posted "NO PARKING-FIRE LANE-TOW AWAY" in
accordance with California Vehicle Code, the International Fire Code and current
VCFPD Fire Lane Standards. All signs and or Fire Lane markings shall be within
recorded access easements.
35. Fire Hydrant Installation -Prior to combustible construction on any parcel, a fire
hydrant capable of providing the required fire flow and duration shall be installed
and in service along the access road I driveway at a location approved by the
18
Resolution No. 2020-3935
Page 9
Fire District, but no further than 250 feet from the building site. The owner of the
combustible construction is responsible for the cost of this installation.
36. Fire Department Clearance -Applicant shall obtain VCFPD Form #126
Requirements for Construction" prior to obtaining a building permit for any new
structures or additions to existing structures.
Ventura County Air Pollution Control District (VCAPCD)
37. The Permittee shall comply with the provisions of all applicable California State
Laws and Air Pollution Control District Rules and Regulations regarding portable
construction equipment and construction vehicles.
38. The Permittee shall comply with the provisions of applicable VCAPCD Rules and
Regulations, which include but are not limited to, Rule 50 (Opacity), Rule 51
Nuisance), and Rule 55 (Fugitive Dust).
39. Operations shall be operated in accordance with the Rules and Regulations of
the Ventura County Air Pollution Control District, with emphasis on Rule 51,
Nuisance.
End-
19
Resolution No. 2020-3935
Page 10
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF VENTURA
CITY OF MOORPARK
SS.
I, Ky Spangler, City Clerk of the City of Moorpark, California, do hereby certify
under penalty of perjury that the foregoing Resolution No. 2020-3935 was adopted by
the City Council of the City of Moorpark at a regular meeting held on the 15th day of
July 2020, and that the same was adopted by the following vote:
AYES: Councilmembers Enegren, Mikos, Pollock, Simons, and Mayor Parvin
NOES : None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None
WITNESS my hand and the official seal of said City this 15th day of July, 2020 .
Ky Sp~
seal)
20
Item: 8.B.
MOORPARK CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA REPORT
TO: Honorable City Council
FROM: Karen Vaughn, Community Development Director
BY: Freddy A. Carrillo, Associate Planner ll
DATE: 07/15/2020 Regular Meeting
SUBJECT: Consider a Resolution Approving Industrial Planned Development
No. 2019-01 and Conditional Use Permit No. 2020-02 for the
Development of a 48,787 Square-Foot, Single-Story Industrial
Building and Associated Site Improvements on an Undeveloped 3.46-
Acre Site at 5850 Condor Drive and Making a Determination of
Exemption Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act in
Connection Therewith, and Consideration of Cost Sharing
Alternatives for Undergrounding of Utilities, on the Application of
Paul Minoo (4M Investment Corporation)
PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND BACKGROUND
On November 13, 2019, Paul Minoo (for 4M Investment Corporation) filed an application
for an Industrial Planned Development (IPD) to develop a 48,787 square-foot, single-
story industrial building and associated site improvements on an undeveloped 3.46-acre
site at 5850 Condor Drive. A potential tenant for the building has not been identified.
The request also includes a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) to allow the proposed
building height of 41 feet and 6 inches, an 11-foot and 6-inch increase above the
maximum height permitted within the Industrial Park (M-1) zone. Additional height may
be permitted with an approved CUP, pursuant to City Code Section 17.24.035.
An IPD is required for new industrial developments exceeding 2,500 square feet of floor
area. As noted above, the Applicant is requesting to develop a 48,787 square-foot
building. Approval of the IPD requires that the design of the proposed project complies
with the provisions of the General Plan and Zoning Code, and is compatible with
adjacent properties. In addition, building height, setbacks, sizes, locations, architectural
styles and colors of all proposed buildings, structures and other on-site improvements,
landscaping design, neighborhood design, and permitted land uses are established as
part of the IPD review and approval. A CUP is required to deviate from the maximum
2
ATTACHMENT 5
21
Honorable City Council
07/15/2020 Regular Meeting
Page 2
height permitted within the M-1 zone. The maximum height in the M-1 zone is 30 feet,
however, City Code allows the Applicant to propose a maximum height of 60 feet,
subject to approval of a CUP. An analysis of the proposed height is provided in the
Setbacks and Height section below.
The Applicant has also submitted a request to have the City participate in the cost of
undergrounding of overhead utilities. This is discussed further in the Undergrounding of
Utilities section.
Previous Applications:
On October 6, 1999, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 1999-1658 approving
Industrial Planned Development Nos. 99-01 and 99-02 for the construction of two
industrial/warehouse buildings on contiguous lots located on the subject property.
Building permits for the IPD and CUP were never obtained. Subsequently, these
permits expired.
On April 4, 2001, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2001-1829 to vacate a 0.22-
acre portion of Princeton Avenue (formerly Los Angeles Avenue) right-of-way, at the
southeast corner of Condor Drive and Princeton Avenue, immediately adjacent to the
project site.
DISCUSSIONS AND ANALYSIS
Existing Conditions:
The 3.46-acre project site is located on the southeast corner of Princeton Avenue and
Condor Drive (see Attachment 2 - Aerial Map). Surrounding land uses are primarily
industrial buildings, a single-family dwelling, community park and school. The site
consists of two undeveloped lots and a corner lot that was previously public right-of-way
and covered with asphalt adjacent to Princeton Avenue. This lot was vacated by the
City Council on April 4, 2001, as part of the conditions of approval for Industrial Planned
Development Nos. 99-01 and 99-02 to realign the intersection of Princeton Avenue
(formerly known as Los Angeles Avenue) and Condor Drive. A condition of approval
requires the Applicant to record a lot merger to consolidate the development to one
property, prior to issuance of building permits.
The following table identifies the General Plan, zoning, and existing land uses for each
lot and the vicinity:
Location General Plan Zoning Existing Land Use
Project
Site*
Light Industrial (I-1)
and
Freeway / Right-of-
Way (Frwy-R/W )
Industrial Park (M-1)
Vacant lots and paved
section adjacent to
Princeton Avenue
North
Light Industrial (l-1) Industrial Park (M-1) Office Building
322
Honorable City Council
07/15/2020 Regular Meeting
Page 3
South
School (S),
Park (P), and
Medium Density
Residential
(4DU/AC)
Industrial Park (M-1),
Rural Exclusive
(RE-1AC), and Single-
Family Residential
(R-1-6)
School, Community
Park, and Detached
Single -Family Homes
East
Light Industrial (l-1) Industrial Park (M-1) Light Industrial Building
West
Light Industrial (l-1) Industrial Park (M-1) Light Industrial Building
*The project site consists of Assessor Parcel Nos. 513-0-060-315, 513-0-060-185, and
513-0-060-175
General Plan Consistency:
The General Plan land use designation for the project site is Light Industrial (l-1) on two
existing lots and Freeway/Right-of-Way (Frwy-R/W ) on the previously vacated corner
parcel. The purpose and intent of the l-1 designation is to provide for a variety of
industrial uses within the City. Suitable uses include light industrial service, technical
research and business office use in a business park context. The Frwy-R/W
designation identifies the existing right-of-way and portions of future right-of-way for the
SR-118 and SR-23 freeways. As mentioned above, the City Council vacated the 0.22-
acre parcel to realign the intersection of Princeton Avenue and Condor Drive. At that
time, the Council determined the parcel was consistent with the General Plan
Circulation Element. The current application proposes paving and landscaping
improvements to this property that are fundamentally consistent with the previous
industrial development. In addition, the City is in the process of updating the General
Plan where the land use designation will be cleaned up to be consistent with the
industrial designation of the adjoining lots.
Land Use Element Goals and Policies:
• GOAL 10: Encourage a diversity of industrial uses which are located and
designed in a compatible manner with surrounding land uses.
POLICY 10.1: New Industrial development should be located adjacent to existing
industrial uses and along major transportation corridors.
Zoning Consistency:
The zoning designation of the three subject parcels is Industrial Park (M-1). The
purpose of this zone is to provide suitable areas for exclusive development of light
industrial, service, technical research and related business office uses in an industrial
park context, in conjunction with stringent requirements for building design, noise,
landscaping and performance standards. At this time, the Applicant has not identified a
potential tenant for the proposed building. Any future uses will be evaluated for
consistency with the M-1 zoning requirements on a case-by-case basis as the Applicant
423
Honorable City Council
07/15/2020 Regular Meeting
Page 4
is able to identify potential tenants.
As designed and with the approval of the CUP for additional building height, the
proposed industrial development complies with all applicable requirements of the
Zoning Ordinance standards, including building location, size, setbacks, massing scale,
architecture style, colors, and landscaping.
Setbacks and Height:
Table 17.24.035 of the City Code establishes the development standards for properties
within the M-1 zone, including lot area, setbacks, height and building coverage. The
following table summarizes the maximum building height of the M-1 zoning designation.
General
Requirements
Listed Under
Table 17.24.035
M-1 Zone
Development
Standard
Proposed Industrial
Planned Development
Complies
A. Floor area ratio,
maximum 0.38 0.32 Yes
B. Lot area,
minimum
10,000
square-feet
150,948
Square feet Yes
C. Front yard
setback, minimum 20 feet 101 feet, 7 inches Yes
D. Interior side
yard setback,
minimum
5 feet 34 feet Yes
E. Street side yard
setback, minimum 5 feet 35 feet Yes
F. Rear yard
setback, minimum zero 34 feet Yes
G. Building and
structure height,
maximum
30 feet 41-feet, 6-inch Yes, with an approved CUP
The proposed height of 41-feet and 6-inches is generally consistent with the height of
existing industrial development in the vicinity of the project site, including PennyMac at
47-feet and Laritech, Inc. at 31-feet. In addition, the proposed building is below the
grade level of the adjacent lot; therefore, the visual impact of the proposed building is
minor and would not present any impacts on adjoining uses.
Architecture:
The proposed building design features contemporary industrial architecture. Concrete
tilt-up panels with rectangular tinted “Clerestory” windows are used throughout to give
an industrial appearance to the building and admit light without compromising interior
wall space. “Clerestory” windows are generally placed high on a wall plane, above eye
level. In addition, metal landscape trellises with crawling vines will be mounted on the
walls to break up the massing of the building. Two separate entryways are incorporated
into the southern side of building. This provides the property owner the opportunity to
lease the building to two tenants and demise the space in the future. Each entrance
524
Honorable City Council
07/15/2020 Regular Meeting
Page 5
includes an exterior staircase and accessible ramp, and entrances are highlighted by a
weathered metal awning. Two roll-up truck doors at dock height and two roll-up truck
doors at grade level are also proposed on the northeastern side of the building, each
accented by a weathered metal awning to match the entrance. An Alucobond® panel
(similar to brushed aluminum) element extends above the roof line to give the building a
unique design and will serve to screen the future air conditioning equipment. The
architectural style, massing, and scale of the building are compatible with the
surrounding business campus directly adjacent to the project site. Staff has evaluated
the proposed architecture and has determined that it is compatible with the existing
adjacent industrial buildings.
Circulation and Traffic:
Access to the site would be provided from two driveways to Condor Drive with one
driveway serving passenger traffic and the easterly driveway intended or commercial
vehicles and trucks. The truck driveway leads directly into the loading docks on the
eastern side of the proposed building. Condor Drive provides one travel lane in each
direction. On-street parking is not permitted along the roadway. The posted speed limit
is 30 miles per hour (mph). No access will be provided on Princeton Avenue.
The Applicant submitted a Focused Traffic Analysis prepared by Ganddini Group, Inc.
The purpose of this study is to provide an assessment of traffic operations resulting
from development of the proposed project and to identify measures necessary to
identify and mitigate any potential significant traffic impacts. The Traffic Analysis
modeled existing traffic and proposed traffic volumes, the level of service (LOS) of, the
peak hour signal warrant, and queue length analyses at the intersections, and
determined that the project would not result in any significant impacts during the AM
and PM peak hours at the intersections of Poindexter Avenue at Condor Drive and
Avenida Colonia at Condor Drive. The study established that the intersection currently
operates at LOS D/F during AM and PM peak periods, which falls below the General
Plan standard of LOS C. However, the Study also concludes that the proposed
development would not reduce the LOS beyond the existing conditions, and therefore
no impacts are presented. A more detailed analysis and the Focused Traffic Analysis
are provided in the California Environmental Quality Act Compliance and Exemption
Determination (Attachment 5).
Parking and Loading Areas:
The City Code requires one off-street parking space per 500 square feet of gross floor
area for industrial uses, such as manufacturing, assembly, and distribution. As a result,
97 on-site parking spaces would be required to serve the 48,787 square-foot building.
The Applicant is proposing 116 spaces located on the south side of the proposed
building. These parking spaces include standard, accessible and motorcycle parking.
The following table summarizes the project compliance with the parking requirements of
the City Code:
625
Honorable City Council
07/15/2020 Regular Meeting
Page 6
Building Size
Minimum Parking Required
Based on Gross Floor Area
of Building
Total Parking
Spaces Required
Total Parking
Spaces Provided
Proposed 48,787 square-
foot industrial building 1 space/500 square-feet 97.5 116
*Pursuant to City Code Section 17.32.030, fractional spaces of .5 or less are rounded down to the nearest
whole number.
The City Code requires two loading spaces for industrial uses (warehouses, storage
facilities, manufacturing, etc.) for a new building ranging from 30,001 square feet to
80,000 square feet. The Applicant is proposing four truck-loading spaces for a
proposed 47,787 square-foot building along the east side of the proposed building,
comprised of two high docks and two on-grade loading spaces. Each loading space
provides the required dimensions of 50 feet in length by 12 feet in width, with a turning
radius of 45 feet and clear of overhead obstructions. Loading areas must be located in
rear or side yard areas outside of required setbacks and must be designed so trucks do
not back onto public or private streets or alleys. In addition, loading spaces must be
designed to prevent interference with vehicular and pedestrian circulation. The four
proposed loading areas do not conflict with traffic or circulation and exceed the number
required by the City Code.
Grading and Drainage:
The project has been designed to provide for all necessary on-site and off-site storm
drain improvements including compliance with National Pollution Discharge Elimination
System (NPDES) requirements. Best Management Practices (BMP) Drainage Facilities
are also required so that surface water flows are intercepted and treated. The BMP and
NPDES improvements will be reviewed by the City Engineer/Public Works Director as
part of the condition compliance process prior to issuance of a grading permit.
Construction of the project would result in ground surface disturbance during site
clearance and grading. Uniformly applied conditions of approval imposed on the Project
would require stockpiles, excavation, and exposed soil to be covered with secured
tarps, plastic sheeting, erosion control fabrics, or treated with a bio-degradable soil
stabilize. Furthermore, the Applicant would be required to obtain a California State
Water Resources Control Board Construction General Permit, which requires
development of a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP).
Landscaping:
The Applicant has proposed a landscape plan that includes a variety of trees, shrubs,
and groundcover across the property, including the use of perimeter trees and hedges
along the west, south, and east property lines. These trees and hedges will screen the
parking facilities from view along adjacent public streets. To ensure landscaping is
installed properly and consistent with the City’s Landscape Guidelines, a special
condition has been added that requires a landscape and irrigation plan to be reviewed
and approved by the Parks and Recreation Director and the Community Development
726
Honorable City Council
07/15/2020 Regular Meeting
Page 7
Director prior to issuance of a building permit.
Undergrounding of Utilities:
Three wooden utility poles owned by Southern California Edison (SCE) are currently
located on the west side of the site, within the proposed parking area. Standard
Condition of Approval No. 145 of Resolution No. 2009-2799 requires that:
Prior to issuance of the first building permit, all existing and proposed utilities,
including electrical transmission lines less than 67Kv, must be under-grounded
consistent with plans approved by the City Engineer, Public Works Director and
Community Development Director. Any exceptions must be approved by the City
Council.
These existing wooden poles are less than 67Kv and therefore would be required to be
removed and the utilities placed underground as part of the project. The Applicant is
aware of this condition and is willing to underground the on-site poles; however, SCE is
requiring the Applicant to underground one additional off-site pole, located on the
southeast corner of Condor Drive and Virginia Colony Place. This is necessary
because the removal of the three on-site poles would require the Virginia Colony pole to
be supported by a new guy wire. There is not sufficient room in the proximity of the pole
to safely locate the guy wire, therefore this pole must be undergrounded as well. The
four-pole scope of work (three on-site and one off-site) would qualify as a “Rule 20c
Project” under the California Public Utilities Commission Undergrounding Program. Rule
20c projects must be funded entirely by the project applicant. The overall costs would
include an amount that must be paid to SCE as well as additional work related to the
undergrounding that the Applicant’s contractor would complete. The preliminary cost
estimate from SCE for this Rule 20c Project is $193,317. In order to receive a final
actual cost from SCE, the Applicant would need to pay additional fees to SCE for the
design work. The Applicant’s contractor is also responsible to perform some work
associated with the undergrounding of utilities. The Applicant provided a cost estimate
of $585,000 for this additional work. The total preliminary cost of undergrounding the
four utility poles would be approximately $778,317. A final cost estimate has not been
generated for this scenario.
The Applicant has the option to remove an additional utility pole and guy pole on
Princeton Avenue north of the project site in addition to the three on-site poles and
off-site pole at Condor Drive and Virginia Colony Place. Expanding the scope of work in
this manner would qualify the project as an SCE “Rule 20b Project”. Rule 20b projects
qualify for SCE credit and are less expensive to the Applicant. The actual cost from
SCE for a proposed five pole scope of work (three on-site and two off-site) Rule 20b
Project is $109,398. The Applicant has also indicated that the work performed by the
contractor would have the same cost estimate of $585,000. The total cost of
undergrounding the five utility poles would be approximately $694,398.
827
Honorable City Council
07/15/2020 Regular Meeting
Page 8
In order to receive the SCE credit, the Applicant decided to pursue the expanded Rule
20b scope of work and has submitted a request that the City provide funding of
$469,398 for the portion of the work under the Rule 20b scenario and work provided by
the Applicant’s contractor (Attachment 4). This includes $34,398 for SCE labor of
installing switches, transformers, cables, and removal of existing poles, and $435,000
for the labor that the Applicant is responsible for, including trenching, installing conduits,
and purchasing and installing storage equipment. The Applicant is willing to pay
$75,000 for the SCE labor and $150,000 for the contracting work. The total cost that the
Applicant is willing to pay to pursue Rule 20b is $225,000 (roughly 1/3 of the total cost).
A summary of the costs for each scenario and the Applicant’s request is provided
below:
Rule 20b – Proposed by Applicant
(undergrounding of three on-site poles and two off-site poles and one guy pole)
Southern California
Edison Charges
Private Contractor
Charges
Total
$109,398 $585,000 $694,398
Proposed to be Paid by
Applicant
-$75,000 -$150,000 -$225,000
Requested City
Contribution
-$34,398 -$435,000 -$469,398
Rule 20c – Not Proposed by Applicant
(undergrounding of three on-site poles and one off-site pole)
Southern California
Edison Costs
Private Contractor Costs Total
$193,317* $585,000** $778,317
*Preliminary cost estimate
**Though this scope of work would be smaller than the Rule 20b scenario, the Applicant has stated that
the contractor costs would be the same.
Generally, costs associated with the undergrounding of utility poles (on-site and off-site)
associated with new development are the responsibility of the developer. The
application of the standard conditions of approval, as adopted by the City Council, is
uniformly applied to all development projects citywide. The Applicant, however, is
requesting that the City fund $469,398 towards this work. The City does not have
existing funding sources identified for this purpose. Further, the use of City funds to
support private development may trigger prevailing wage considerations and may
increase the cost of the labor. For these reasons, staff is recommending that the City
Council adopt a resolution approving the IPD and CUP, but denying the request for the
City to fund costs associated with the undergrounding of overhead utilities.
Should the Council want to consider other options for assisting in the Applicant with the
development of this site, staff has identified the following potential alternatives:
928
Honorable City Council
07/15/2020 Regular Meeting
Page 9
• Alternative No. 1: Approve the IPD and CUP, and require the Applicant to fund
the formation of a Community Facilities District (CFD) in an amount no higher
than the cost of undergrounding four poles that include SCE cost and
Contractor’s cost based on a Final Estimate provided by SCE. A deposit to the
City in the amount of the total cost of $778,317 would be required to begin work
on the CFD formation.
Should Council elect this alternative, the Council should be aware that formation
of a CFD would take 9-12 months to complete and would delay the construction
of the project. The Applicant would also be required to pay additional SCE fees to
acquire an actual cost estimate for the work. Furthermore, the project parking lot
design would need to be modified to work around the location of existing poles.
In order to ensure the project meets City Code, a condition of approval would be
added for any modifications to the site plan be reviewed by the Community
Development Director.
• Alternative No. 2: Approve the IPD and CUP, and waive Standard Condition
No. 145 (requirement to underground utilities).
Should Council elect this alternative, staff suggests that Council identify objective
parameters for the basis of the waiver of condition, such as project size (i.e. on a
project of 3.5 acres or less), zoning (i.e. projects within industrial zoning districts),
or some other objective standard to provide guidance for subsequent developer
requests. This alternative would also require changes to the site plan. If this
alternative is preferred, a condition of approval would be required so that any
modifications to the site plan resulting from the poles remaining on-site would be
reviewed by the Community Development Director.
Findings
Industrial Planned Development Permit Findings
In order to approve the Industrial Planned Development Permit, the following findings
must be made:
1. The site design, including structure location, size, height, setbacks, massing,
scale, architectural style and colors, and landscaping, is consistent with the goals
and policies of the City’s General Plan and Zoning Ordinance as described in the
staff report an attachments thereto in that the building design features a
contemporary industrial architecture that includes concrete tilt-up panels with
rectangular tinted clerestory windows and roll-up truck doors. The scale of the
building is compatible with the surrounding business campus directly adjacent to
the project site.
2. The site design would not create negative impacts on or impair the utility of
properties, structures or uses in the surrounding area in that the building height
1029
Honorable City Council
07/15/2020 Regular Meeting
Page 10
of 41-feet and 6-inches is generally consistent with the height of the existing
industrial buildings in the vicinity. In addition, the building is below the grade level
of the adjacent lot.
3. The proposed use is compatible with existing and permitted uses in the
surrounding area in that suitable uses, such as, light industrial services, technical
research and business office would be permitted under the Industrial Park (M-1)
Zoning designation.
Conditional Use Permit
In order to approve the Conditional Use Permit for the additional building height, the
following findings must be made:
1. The proposed use is consistent with the provisions of the General Plan, zoning
ordinance, and any other applicable regulations; in that Table 17.24.031 of the
City Code allows a maximum building height of 60-feet within the Industrial Park
(M-1) zone with an approved CUP.
2. The proposed use is compatible with both existing and permitted land uses in the
surrounding area, in that the proposed building height of 41-feet and 6-inches is
common in the existing business campus.
3. The proposed use is compatible with the scale, visual character, and design of
surrounding properties, in that the proposed building height is appropriate for the
architecture of the building and consistent with adjacent industrial buildings.
4. The proposed use would not be obnoxious or harmful, or impair the utility of
neighboring property or uses, in that the proposed building is below the grade
level of the adjacent lot; therefore, the visual impact of the proposed building is
minor and would not present any impacts on adjoining uses.
5. The proposed use would not be detrimental to the public health, safety,
convenience, or welfare, in that the project is substantially consistent with
existing industrial development in the vicinity, includes sufficient loading and on-
site parking facilities, and will be designed to comply with all applicable codes
and regulations.
NOTICING
Public Notice for this meeting was given consistent with Chapter 17.44.070 of the
Zoning Ordinance as follows:
1. Publication. The notice of the public hearing was published in the Ventura
County Star on July 5, 2020.
1130
Honorable City Council
07/15/2020 Regular Meeting
Page 11
2. Mailing. The notice of the public hearing was mailed on July 3, 2020, to owners
of real property, as identified on the latest adjusted Ventura County Tax Assessor
Roles, within one-thousand (1,000) feet of the exterior boundaries of the
assessor’s parcel(s) subject to the hearing.
3. Sign. Two 32 square-foot signs were placed on the street frontage on July 3,
2020.
PROCESSING TIME LIMITS
Time limits have been established for the processing of development projects under the
Permit Streamlining Act (Government Code Title 7, Division 1, Chapter 4.5), the
Subdivision Map Act (Government Code Title 7, Division 2), and the California
Environmental Quality Act Statutes and Guidelines (Public Resources Code Division 13,
and California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Chapter 3). Under the applicable
provisions of these regulations, the following timelines have been established for action
on this project:
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
In accordance with the City’s environmental review procedures adopted by resolution,
the Community Development Director or designee determines the level of review
necessary for a project to comply with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).
Some projects may be exempt from review based upon a specific category listed in
CEQA. Other projects may be exempt under a general rule that environmental review is
not necessary where it can be determined that there would be no possibility of
significant effect upon the environment. A project which does not qualify for an
exemption requires the preparation of an Initial Study to assess the level of potential
environmental impacts.
Pursuant to Section 15332 (Class 32: In-Fill Development Projects) of the CEQA
Guidelines, projects characterized as in-fill development that are substantially
surrounded by urban uses are categorically exempt from environmental review. The
CEQA Compliance and Exemption Determination (Attachment 5) compares the details
of the proposed projects with the requirements to make the determination of the 15332
exemption, including that:
(a) The project is consistent with the applicable general plan designation and all
applicable general plan policies as well as with applicable zoning designation and
regulations;
(b) The proposed development occurs within city limits on a project site of no more
than five acres substantially surrounded by urban uses;
(c) The project site has no value as habitat for endangered, rare, or threatened
species;
(d) Approval of the project would not result in any significant effects related to traffic,
noise, air quality, or water quality; and
1231
Honorable City Council
07/15/2020 Regular Meeting
Page 12
(e) The site can be adequately served by all required utilities and public services.
As outlined in the Determination, the project is consistent Section 15332 of the CEQA
Guidelines and no further environmental review is required.
PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION
On June 2, 2020, the Planning Commission voted 3-0, with Commissioner Di Cecco
dissenting, to adopt Resolution No. 2020-650 (Attachment 6) recommending that the
City Council conditionally approve Industrial Planned Development No. 2019-01 and
Conditional Use Permit No. 2020-02. Because the request for financial assistance for
undergrounding of utilities is not within the purview of the Commission, the vote was
based purely on the IPD and CUP requests.
FISCAL IMPACT
Staff costs associated with the processing of the entitlements are reimbursable through
the developer deposit account with the City. All landscaping within the project will be
maintained by the property owner.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION (ROLL CALL VOTE REQUIRED)
1. Open the public hearing, accept public testimony and close the public hearing;
and
2. Adopt Resolution No. 2020-____ approving Industrial Planned Development
No. 2019-01 and Conditional Use Permit No. 2020-02, subject to the conditions
of approval contained therein, and denying the Applicant’s funding request of
$469,398 for costs associated with the undergrounding of utilities pursuant to the
Southern California Edison Rule 20b scenario.
Attachment 1: Location Map
Attachment 2: Aerial Map
Attachment 3: Project Exhibits
A. Site Plan
B. Exterior Elevations
C. Floor Plan
D. Landscape Plan
Attachment 4: Request Letter from Mr. Paul Minoo and Southern California Edison
and Contractor’s Costs
Attachment 5: California Environmental Quality Act Compliance and Exemption
Determination, including Focused Traffic Analysis
Attachment 6: Planning Commission Resolution No. 2020-650
Attachment 7: Draft Resolution with Conditions of Approval
1332
Location Map - 5850 Condor Drive ATTACHMENT 1
1433
Aerial Map - 5850 Condor Drive ATTACHMENT 2
1534
E
PP
C
B
C
B
C
BC
B
S
C
BC
B
C
B
C
B
T
D
W M
ICV
ICV
WMWM
T
C
BC
BC
B
C
B
W
M
W
M
D
S
EE
S
P
M
S
W
MW
MW
M
TSPBICV
S63
°
4
0
'
5
9
"
E
80.00'N05°09'49"E321.80'N05°09'49"E155.00'S25°58'58"W20.67'4.00'
CON
C
R
ET
E
DRIVE
WAY
CONCR
E
T
E
DRIVEW
A
Y
CONDORPRINCETONAVENUE DRIVE
VIRGINIA COLONYCON
D
O
R DRIVE
PLACEPRINCETON AVENUE30'30'6 0'C
S
S
S
S
T
T TSPBWM
WM
WM
WM
WM
WMWM
WM
CTVB
CB
CB
CB
CB
D
D
PM
ICV
ICV
ICV
25'-0"
P.U.E.
N52°22'46"E 152.31'L=10
0 .04'
R=47
0 .00'
L=135 .61'R=470 .00'
=16°31'
5
4"
N82°06'24"W 124.58'
N82°06'24"W 150.00'
N81°06'24"E 92 .73'
R=270.00'L=64.83'R=35.00'=106°08'04"R=447.00' =23°12'38"L=181.08'3.21'
S82°06'24"E
N07°54'20"E 210.47'=12°11'44"N3
7
°
3
7
'
1
4
"W
2
5
7
.
7
3
'
1
2
'
X
5
0
'
X
1
4
'
LO
A
D
ING
ZO
N
E
1
2
'
X
5
0
'
X
1
4
'
LO
A
D
ING
ZO
N
E
1
2
'
X
5
0
'
X
1
4
'
LO
A
D
ING
ZO
N
E
A
A
S
H
TO
W
B
-
4
0
AASHTO WB-409'-0"5'9'-0"HC8'-0"9'-0"HC±5'HC45'-0"5 STD. STALLS @ 9'-0" EA.6'-4"0.5% SLOPE FLOORSITE ADDRESS
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
A.P.N.
A.P.N.
A.P.N.
SITE AREA
ZONE:
CODE:
TYPE:
OCCUPANCY:
BUILDING AREA
PARKING REQUIRED
INDUSTRIAL (2/1000)
PARKING PROVIDED
STANDARD
DISABLED
MOTORCYCLE
TOTAL PARKING PROVIDED
BICYCLE PARKING
INTERIOR (LONG TERM)
EXTERIOR (SHORT TERM)
F.A.R.
COVERAGES
BUILDING (F.P. / SITE)
PAVING
LANDSCAPING
HARDSCAPE
PROJECT SUMMARY
5850 CONDOR DRIVE, MOORPARK, CA. 90321
LOTS 17,18 AND 31 OF TRACT NO. 3492, BOOK 95, PAGE 30
OF MAPS IN THE OFFICE OF COUNTY RECORDER, STATE OF
CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
513-060-175 LOT 17
513-060-185 LOT 18
513-060-315 LOT 31
150,948.91 S.F. (3.465 AC)
M-1
2019 CBC,CFC, CMC, CPC, CEC, CAL GREEN
lll - B - FULLY SPRINKLERED
S-1, F AND ACCESSORY B
48,787 SF
97 STALLS
107 STALLS
5 STALLS
4 STALLS
116 STALLS (2.38/1000)
( 7 ) REQ'D. / ( 7 ) PROV'D.
( 7 ) REQ'D. / ( 8 ) PROV'D.
48,787 SF = .32 / 1
48,787 SF = 32.3202 %
62,067 SF = 41.1179%
37,060 SF = 24.5513 %
3,035 SF = 2.0106 %
KEYNOTES
1.LANDSCAPING WITH 6" HIGH MACHINE FORMED CONCRETE CURB AND AUTOMATIC IRRIGATION
CONNECTED TO CENTRAL TIMER, TYP.
2.SEALED A.C. PAVING OVER BASE MATERIAL PER GEOTECHNICAL REPORT , TYP.
3.RECESSED TRUCK LOADING RAMP WITH 6" THICK CONCRETE TILT UP RETAINING WALLS TO MATCH BLDG.
AND 6" THICK REINFORCED CONCRETE SLAB WITH BROOM FINISH AND EXP. JOINTS - SEE SOILS REPORT
4.NEW REINFORCED CONCRETE APRON & CURB CUT AND PER CITY OF MOORPARK STANDARD
5.3'-6" HIGH NATURAL CONCRETE GUARDWALL AT ENTRY STAIRS / DISABLED ACCES RAMP - CLEARSEALED
FINISH, TYP. - SEE EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS
6.24" X 24" SCORED & COLORED CONCRETE DRIVE APRON PER SOILS REPORT RECOMMENDATION WITH
CONCRETE RIBBON - DAVIS COLOR 61222 "EASTERN TAN" OR EQUAL.
7.9'-0" X 18'-0" STANDARD PARKING STALL WITH 2'-0" OVERHANG AND PAINTED STRIPES, TYP. - SEE DETAIL
8.5'-0" X 10'-0" MOTORCYCLE STALL WITH 6" THICK CONC. SLAB AND PAINTED STRIPES, TYP. - SEE DETAIL
9.9'-0" X 18'-0" HANDICAPPED PARKING STALL WITH 5' WIDE LOADING AREA ( 8' WIDE @ VAN ACCESS.)
PROVIDE SIGNAGE AND PAINTED STRIPES, TYP. - PER TITLE 24
10.4'-0" WIDE (MIN.) X 4" THICK REINFORCED CONC. WALK WITH BROOM FINISH AND SAW CUT CONTROL
JOINTS AT 4'-0" O.C., TYP. - PROVIDE TRUNCATED WARNING DEVICES AS REQUIRED.
11.4'-0" X 9'-0" TREE WELL WITH 6" CONCRETE CURB AND AUTOMATIC IRRIGATION, TYP.
12.10' X 12' DOCK HIGH OVERHEAD TRUCK DOOR, TYP.
13.12' X 14' GRADE LEVEL OVERHEAD TRUCK DOOR , TYP.
14.3' X 7' EXIT / MAN DOOR , TYP.
15.3'-0" WIDE METAL CANOPY (OPEN) WITH S.S. SCREEN, TYP.- PAINTED FASCIA / FRAMING
16.DISABLED PATH OF TRAVEL TO MAIN ENTRY, TYP.
17.6" THICK REINFORCED CONCRETE TRUCK MANUEVERING AREA PER SOILS REPORT RECOMMENDATION.
18.9'-0" HIGH CONC. TILT UP SCREEN WALL AND TRASH ENCLOSURE WITH SOLID METAL GATES AND SOLID
COVER PTD. TO MATCH BUILDING. SANDBLAST WALLS (BOTH SIDES) - SEE DETAIL
19.CONCRETE TRANSFORMER PAD WITH NEW PIPE GUARDS AS REQUIRED - SEE ELECTRICAL PLANS
20.3'-6" HIGH NATURAL CONCRETE GUARDWALL AT ENTRY STAIRS / DISABLED ACCESS RAMP W/
CLEARSEALED FINISH, TYP.
21.PNUEMATICALLY PLACED REINFORCED GUNITE RETAINING WALL (HEIGHT VARIES) WITH
SCORED "STONE" APPEARANCE EARTHTONE COLORS - SEE ENGINEERS PLANS
22.12'(W) X 50'(L) X 14' (H) TRUCK LOADING ZONE PER CITY STANDARD, TYP. (2)
23.NEW BICYCLE RACKS BY CYCLESAFE OR EQ. ON REINFORCED CONC. PAD, TYP. - SEE DETAIL BELOW
24.PROVIDE NEW CONCRETE SIDEWALK PER CITY STANDARD PLATE. JOIN TO EXISTING SIDEWALK
AS OCCURS - SEE CIVIL PLANS.
25.3'-0" WIDE METAL CANOPY WITH SOLID ROOF, TYP.- PAINTED
26.CAR / VAN POOL CLEAN AIR PARKING STALLS, TYP. OF (11) - PLACES.
IN THE PAINT USED FOR PARKING STALL STRIPING, SUCH THAT THE LOWER EDGE OF THE LAST WORD
ALIGNS WITH THE END OF THE STALL STRIPING BENEATH PARKED VEHICLE:
27.(7) - FUTURE ELECTRIC VEHICLE PARKING STALLS. PROVIDE CONDUIT AND WIRING FOR FUTURE SINGLE
CHARGING UNIT FOR EACH STALL.
A TOTAL OF (18) ELECTRIC (FUTURE) AND / OR CLEAN AIR PARKING STALLS PROVIDED.
PAINT, IN THE PAINT USED FOR PARKING STALL STRIPING, SUCH THAT THE LOWER EDGE OF THE LAST WORD
ALIGNS WITH THE END OF THE STALL STRIPING BENEATH PARKED VEHICLE:30'-0"DRIVE AISLE15'-0"PER F.D.DH
DH
GL
GL
230'±62'-3"72'±
9
6
'
-
2
"96'GL
10
10
10
7
7
6
6
6
6
2
2
10
10
10
10
2
1
1
2
3
4
4
6
18
8
9
10
12
13
14
12
13
25
63'-0"7 STD. STALLS @ 9'-0" EA.54'-0"6 STD. STALLS @ 9'-0" EACH
9'-0"
54'-0"6 STD. STALLS @ 9'-0" EACH
10'-0"
90'-0"10 STD. STALLS @ 9'-0" EACH 9'-0"
90'-0"10 STD. STALLS @ 9'-0" EACH 9'-0"8'-0"9'-0"26'-0"DRIVE AISLE18'-0"10'-0"90'-0"
10 STD . STALLS @ 9'-0" EACH
90'-0"
10 STD . STALLS
@ 9'-0" EACH
5'-0"
1
1
±18'-6"
±19'-6"
±5'-0"
90'-0"
10 STD . STAL
L
S @ 9'-0" EACH
63'-
0
"
7 ST
D
. ST
A
L
L
S
@ 9'-
0
"
EA
.
±6'-0"
±10'-0"
±10'-0"
±16'-9"
±16'-3"
9'-0"30'-0"DRIV
E AISL
E 9'-0"10'-0"9'-0"19'-0"30'-0"DRIVE AISLE±35'-0"14
13
14
19
10'-
0
"
11
22
22
22
22
1
9
7
2
2
5
5
DISABLED PATH OF TRAVEL
FROM PROJECT BOUNDARY
SEE CIVIL PLANS
18
17
7
11
7
7
7
8
21
2121
1
1
1
1
1
7
7 ±3'-6"±3'-6"±34'-0"SETBAC
K
20'-0"20'-0"26'-0"DRIVE AISLE18'-0"18'-
0
"
26'-
0
"
DRI
V
E
AIS
L
E
±
1
0
1
'
-
7
"
S
E
T
BA
C
K 30'-0"0.5% SLOPE FLOOR15
15
1
15
15
4'-0"1
1
23
23
JOIN (N) SIDEWALK
TO (E) SIDEWALK
(LOCATION APPX.)
SEE CIVIL PLANS
24
24
24
24
24 ±34'-0"SETBACK11'-0"68'-6"SCREE
N WALL
±
2
3
5
'
-
9
"RET
A
IN
ING
WA
L
L
±241'-4"
RETAINING WALL
COORDINATE DRAIN / SUMP PUMP
DISCHARGE LOCATION WITH CIVIL
PLANS
2
6
'
-
0
"DRIVE
A
IS
LE
1
8
'
-
0
"
1
0
'
-
0
"
4
9
'
-
0
"
D
R
I
V
E
A
I
S
L
E
6'-0"
35'-0"
SETBACK BY CC&R
ENTRY
ENTRY
2
0
'
-
0
"
3
8
'
-
0
"
5
3
9
9
9
7
EV
CA
EV EV
CA CA
EV
CA CA CA
CA CA CA CA CA EV EV EV
35'-0"
SETBACK BY CC&R
6'88'184'-0"BUILDINGONE STORY CONCRETE TILT UP
INDUSTRIAL BUILDING
48,787 S.F. / 116 STALLS (2.38/1000)
38'-0" TOP OF PARAPET / 30'-0" CLEAR INTERIOR
304'-0"
BUILDING
**3'-0"**3'-0"3'-0"6'-0"1'-10 1/8"BICYCLE RACK
PROVIDE A TOTAL OF (4) FOUR "U"
BIKE RACK(S) WITH CROSS BAR
FOR SITE BY: CYCLESAFE OR EQ.
(616) 954-9977
**VERIFY DIMENSION WITH
VENDOR
REINFORCED CONC.
PAD 6'-0"Erwin Grigorian, P.E.
C033057
5376 N. Sterling Center Drive
Westlake Village, CA 91361
Phone 818. 706. 3997
Fax 818. 706. 2453
Date:
Job:
Drawn by:
Revisions
Sheet :
THIS DOCUMENT, AND THE IDEAS AND DESIGNS
HEREIN, AS AN INSTRUMENT OF PROFESSIONAL
SERVICES, IS THE PROPERTY OF JDO+ASSOCIATES, INC.
AND IS NOT TO BE USED, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, FOR
ANY PROJECT WITHOUT THE WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION
OF JDO+ASSOCIATES, INC.
SITE PLAN
SITE PLAN
FEB. 2020
AREAS AND COVERAGES ARE PRELIMINARY
AND SUBJECT TO CHANGE UPON REVIEW
SC: 1" = 20'-0"
NORTH
A-1
2018.12
VICINITY MAP
N.T.S.
PROJECT LOCATION
NEW INDUSTRIAL
BUILDING FOR
5850 CONDOR DRIVE
MOORPARK, CALIF.
4M INVESTMENT
CORPORATION
TYPICAL PARKING STALLS20'-0" (SEE SITE PLAN)4" WIDE PTD. STRIPE,
TYP. TO MATCH CITY
PARKING STANDARD
FIELD VERIFY PRIOR
TO PAINTING
9'-0"
(SEE SITE PLAN)
2'-0" (OVERHANG)10'-0"MOTORCYCLE(SEE SITE PLAN)4" WIDE PTD. STRIPE,
TYP. TO MATCH CITY
PARKING STANDARD
FIELD VERIFY PRIOR
TO PAINTING
5'-0" EACH
MOTORCYCLE
(SEE SITE PLAN)
MOTORCYCLE
STANDARD
TRASH ENCLOSURE
PIPE SLEEVE FOR CANE
BOLTS OPEN AND CLOSED
POSITION, TYP.
19'-0"9'-6"CONCRETEAPRON(4) - 4 YD. BINS (3' X 6' X 4')
8" HIGH x 6" WIDE CONC.
CURBS, TYP.
SOLID CORRIGATED METAL
GATES (180° SWING)
6" THK. CONCRETE TILT-UP
PANEL - PANEL (PAINTED
ALL AROUND)4'-6"9'-0"9'-0"8'-0"CLEARSOLID CORRIGATED
METAL ROOF, TYP.6'-0"2"CANE BOLT,
TYP.9'-0"ATTACHMENT 3
1635
Erwin Grigorian, P.E.
C033057
5376 N. Sterling Center Drive
Westlake Village, CA 91361
Phone 818. 706. 3997
Fax 818. 706. 2453
Date:
Job:
Drawn by:
Revisions
Sheet :
THIS DOCUMENT, AND THE IDEAS AND DESIGNS
HEREIN, AS AN INSTRUMENT OF PROFESSIONAL
SERVICES, IS THE PROPERTY OF JDO+ASSOCIATES, INC.
AND IS NOT TO BE USED, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, FOR
ANY PROJECT WITHOUT THE WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION
OF JDO+ASSOCIATES, INC.
EXTERIOR
ELEVATIONS
FEB. 2020
A-2
2018.12
NEW INDUSTRIAL
BUILDING FOR
5850 CONDOR DRIVE
MOORPARK, CALIF.
4M INVESTMENT
CORPORATION
T.O. PARAPET
EAST ELEVATION (PARTIAL)
WEST ELEVATION
SOUTHEAST ELEVATION
SOUTH ELEVATION (PARTIAL)
CONDOR DRIVE
LOS ANGELES AVENUE
KEYNOTES
1) SMOOTH CONCRETE TILT-UP PANEL - PAINTED DUNN EDWARDS NO. DE6240 "WATERMIST", TYP.
2) SMOOTH CONCRETE TILT-UP PANEL - PAINTED DUNN EDWARDS NO. DE6242 "WELLS GRAY", TYP.
3) SANDBLASTED AND CLEARSEALED NATURAL CONCRETE TILT UP WALL (DESIGN MIX AGGREGATE) W/ V-GROOVE
ACCENT LINES (RETURN GROOVES & FINISH AT ALL EXPOSED SIDES), TYP.
4) 1" THICK VITRO ATLANTICA SOLARBAN 70XL (2) OVER CLEAR IN CLEAR ANODIZED OFFSET ALUMINUM STOREFRONT
WITH SILICONE VERTICAL JOINTS, TYP. AT RECESSED OPENINGS
5) 1" THICK VITRO ATLANTICA SOLARBAN 70XL (2) OVER CLEAR IN CLEAR ANODIZED OFFSET ALUMINUM STOREFRONT
WITH SILICONE VERTICAL JOINTS, TYP. AT BUILDING SURFACE
6) EXTERIOR PLASTER SOFFIT OVER RECESS WITH CONTINUOUS VENTED SCREED (BRUSHED ALUM.)
AND AUTOMATIC RECESSED LIGHTING, TYP. - SOFFIT PAINTED DUNN EDWARDS NO. DE6240 "WATERMIST", TYP.
7) HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL V-GROOVE ACCENT LINES, TYP.- EXTEND INTO OPENINGS AND
BEHIND PANELS AT ALL AREAS WHERE EXPOSED, TYP.
8) STAINLESS STEEL EXTERIOR CLADDING SYSTEM, TYP.
9) WALL MOUNTED LIGHT FIXTURE (CL AT 23'-6" AFF) - COLOR TO MATCH BUILDING, TYP. - SEE ELEC. PLANS
10) 3'-0" X 8'-0" (PAIR) CLEAR ANODIZED OFFSET ALUMINUM STOREFRONT DOORS AND GLAZING TO MATCH ADJACENT
11) 3' X 7' METAL DOOR PAINTED DUNN EDWARDS NO. DET421 "LE CORBUSIER CRUSH", TYP.
12) 9' X 12' ROLL UP TRUCK DOOR AT DOCK HIGH CONDITION PAINTED DUNN EDWARDS NO. DE6242 "WELLS GRAY", TYP.
13) 12' X 14' ROLL UP TRUCK DOOR AT GRADE LEVEL PAINTED DUNN EDWARDS NO. DE6242 "WELLS GRAY", TYP.
14) 3'-0" WIDE METAL CANOPY WITH STEEL CHANNEL FASCIA AND SOLID COVER , TYP.
PAINTED DUNN EDWARDS NO. DE6377 "BOAT ANCHOR"
15) 42" HIGH CONC TILT-UP GUARDWALL AT TRUCK WELL - PAINTED DUNN EDWARDS NO. DE6240 "WATERMIST", TYP.
16) 42" SANDBLASTED & CLEARSEALED CONCRETE WALLS (DESIGN MIX AGGREGATE) AT ENTRIES (HT. VARIES) -
SANDBLAST ALL SIDES WHERE EXPOSED, TYP.
17) 8' W X 3' H WALL MOUNTED HORIZ. LANDSCAPE SCREEN BY "GREENSCREEN" (SILVER) W/ NO. 5104 TOP/SIDE EDGE
TRIM & NO. 5105 BOTTOM TRIM - ATTACHED W/ NO. 5132 CLIPS ON NO. 5159 8" STAND-OFF BRACKETS, TYPICAL
18) 10" (MIN.) HIGH ADDRESS NUMERALS CAST INTO BUILDING WALL- TYPESTYLE TO BE "FRIZ QUADRATA"
19) 3'-0" WIDE CANTILEVER METAL AWNING (OPEN) WITH PAINTED STEEL CHANNEL FASCIA AND S.S. MESH SCREENS, TYP.
FASCIA AND FRAMING PAINTED DUNN EDWARDS NO. DET421 "LE CORBUSIER CRUSH", TYP.
20) STEEL COVER (FASTENED TO RETAINING WALL) WITH PAINTED W.W.M. FABRIC SCREEN - PAINT TO MATCH BLDG., TYP.
EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS
NORTHEAST ELEVATION
38'-0"41'-6"MAX. HT. = 30'-0" M-1 ZONE10'-0"7'-0"7'-0"7'-0"12 5
18
5
T.O. WALL
3'-6"7'-0"5850
3 75
SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"
2 5 5 5 8
4 8
8
11 6
25 5
5
8
4 6 4 6 4
6 4 10 61105
1111
4
52
1 13 12
11
13121213
19 141212
13
5 5122 2
14
17 5
999
DISTORTED
VIEW
DISTORTED
VIEW
DISTORTED
VIEW
DISTORTED
VIEW
SOUTH ELEVATION (PARTIAL)
CONDOR DRIVE
EAST ELEVATION
NORTH ELEVATIONWEST ELEVATION
LOS ANGELES AVENUE
16 161616
DISTORTED
VIEW
DISTORTED
VIEW
DISTORTED
VIEW
DISTORTED
VIEW
6 4 64
INDICATES RETAINING WALL IN
FOREGROUND- NOT SHOWN
INDICATES RETAINING WALL IN
FOREGROUND- NOT SHOWN 18'-0"1'-0"19 19
19
19 19 19 19
1717 1717
17171717
7
77
7
20
20
1736
Erwin Grigorian, P.E.
C033057
5376 N. Sterling Center Drive
Westlake Village, CA 91361
Phone 818. 706. 3997
Fax 818. 706. 2453
Date:
Job:
Drawn by:
Revisions
Sheet :
THIS DOCUMENT, AND THE IDEAS AND DESIGNS
HEREIN, AS AN INSTRUMENT OF PROFESSIONAL
SERVICES, IS THE PROPERTY OF JDO+ASSOCIATES, INC.
AND IS NOT TO BE USED, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, FOR
ANY PROJECT WITHOUT THE WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION
OF JDO+ASSOCIATES, INC.
EXTERIOR
ELEVATIONS
FEB. 2020
A-2
2018.12
NEW INDUSTRIAL
BUILDING FOR
5850 CONDOR DRIVE
MOORPARK, CALIF.
4M INVESTMENT
CORPORATION
T.O. PARAPET
EAST ELEVATION (PARTIAL)
WEST ELEVATION
SOUTHEAST ELEVATION
SOUTH ELEVATION (PARTIAL)
CONDOR DRIVE
LOS ANGELES AVENUE
KEYNOTES
1) SMOOTH CONCRETE TILT-UP PANEL - PAINTED DUNN EDWARDS NO. DE6240 "WATERMIST", TYP.
2) SMOOTH CONCRETE TILT-UP PANEL - PAINTED DUNN EDWARDS NO. DE6242 "WELLS GRAY", TYP.
3) SANDBLASTED AND CLEARSEALED NATURAL CONCRETE TILT UP WALL (DESIGN MIX AGGREGATE) W/ V-GROOVE
ACCENT LINES (RETURN GROOVES & FINISH AT ALL EXPOSED SIDES), TYP.
4) 1" THICK VITRO ATLANTICA SOLARBAN 70XL (2) OVER CLEAR IN CLEAR ANODIZED OFFSET ALUMINUM STOREFRONT
WITH SILICONE VERTICAL JOINTS, TYP. AT RECESSED OPENINGS
5) 1" THICK VITRO ATLANTICA SOLARBAN 70XL (2) OVER CLEAR IN CLEAR ANODIZED OFFSET ALUMINUM STOREFRONT
WITH SILICONE VERTICAL JOINTS, TYP. AT BUILDING SURFACE
6) EXTERIOR PLASTER SOFFIT OVER RECESS WITH CONTINUOUS VENTED SCREED (BRUSHED ALUM .)
AND AUTOMATIC RECESSED LIGHTING , TYP. - SOFFIT PAINTED DUNN EDWARDS NO . DE6240 "WATERMIST", TYP.
7) HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL V-GROOVE ACCENT LINES, TYP.- EXTEND INTO OPENINGS AND
BEHIND PANELS AT ALL AREAS WHERE EXPOSED, TYP.
8) STAINLESS STEEL EXTERIOR CLADDING SYSTEM, TYP.
9) WALL MOUNTED LIGHT FIXTURE (CL AT 23'-6" AFF) - COLOR TO MATCH BUILDING, TYP. - SEE ELEC. PLANS
10) 3'-0" X 8'-0" (PAIR) CLEAR ANODIZED OFFSET ALUMINUM STOREFRONT DOORS AND GLAZING TO MATCH ADJACENT
11) 3' X 7' METAL DOOR PAINTED DUNN EDWARDS NO. DET421 "LE CORBUSIER CRUSH", TYP.
12) 9' X 12' ROLL UP TRUCK DOOR AT DOCK HIGH CONDITION PAINTED DUNN EDWARDS NO. DE6242 "WELLS GRAY", TYP.
13) 12' X 14' ROLL UP TRUCK DOOR AT GRADE LEVEL PAINTED DUNN EDWARDS NO. DE6242 "WELLS GRAY", TYP.
14) 3'-0" WIDE METAL CANOPY WITH STEEL CHANNEL FASCIA AND SOLID COVER , TYP.
PAINTED DUNN EDWARDS NO. DE6377 "BOAT ANCHOR"
15) 42" HIGH CONC TILT-UP GUARDWALL AT TRUCK WELL - PAINTED DUNN EDWARDS NO. DE6240 "WATERMIST", TYP.
16) 42" SANDBLASTED & CLEARSEALED CONCRETE WALLS (DESIGN MIX AGGREGATE) AT ENTRIES (HT. VARIES) -
SANDBLAST ALL SIDES WHERE EXPOSED, TYP.
17) 8' W X 3' H WALL MOUNTED HORIZ . LANDSCAPE SCREEN BY "GREENSCREEN" (SILVER) W/ NO. 5104 TOP/SIDE EDGE
TRIM & NO. 5105 BOTTOM TRIM - ATTACHED W/ NO. 5132 CLIPS ON NO. 5159 8" STAND-OFF BRACKETS, TYPICAL
18) 10" (MIN.) HIGH ADDRESS NUMERALS CAST INTO BUILDING WALL- TYPESTYLE TO BE "FRIZ QUADRATA"
19) 3'-0" WIDE CANTILEVER METAL AWNING (OPEN) WITH PAINTED STEEL CHANNEL FASCIA AND S.S. MESH SCREENS, TYP.
FASCIA AND FRAMING PAINTED DUNN EDWARDS NO. DET421 "LE CORBUSIER CRUSH", TYP.
20) STEEL COVER (FASTENED TO RETAINING WALL) WITH PAINTED W.W.M. FABRIC SCREEN - PAINT TO MATCH BLDG., TYP.
EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS
NORTHEAST ELEVATION
38'-0"41'-6"MAX. HEIGHT = 30-0" M-1 ZONE10'-0"7'-0"7'-0"7'-0"12 5
18
5
T.O. SCREEN WALL
3'-6"7'-0"5850
3 75
SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"
2 5 5 5 8
4 8
8
11 6
25 5
5
8
4 6 4 6 4
6 4 10 61105
1111
4
52
1 13 12
11
13121213
19 141212
13
5 5122 2
14
17 5
999
DISTORTED
VIEW
DISTORTED
VIEW
DISTORTED
VIEW
DISTORTED
VIEW
SOUTH ELEVATION (PARTIAL)
CONDOR DRIVE
EAST ELEVATION
NORTH ELEVATIONWEST ELEVATION
LOS ANGELES AVENUE
16 161616
DISTORTED
VIEW
DISTORTED
VIEW
DISTORTED
VIEW
DISTORTED
VIEW
6 4 64
INDICATES RETAINING WALL IN
FOREGROUND- NOT SHOWN
INDICATES RETAINING WALL IN
FOREGROUND- NOT SHOWN 18'-0"1'-0"19 19
19
19 19 19 19
1717 1717
17171717
7
77
7
20
20
1837
Erwin Grigorian, P.E.
C033057
5376 N. Sterling Center Drive
Westlake Village, CA 91361
Phone 818. 706. 3997
Fax 818. 706. 2453
Date:
Job:
Drawn by:
Revisions
Sheet :
THIS DOCUMENT, AND THE IDEAS AND DESIGNS
HEREIN, AS AN INSTRUMENT OF PROFESSIONAL
SERVICES, IS THE PROPERTY OF JDO+ASSOCIATES, INC.
AND IS NOT TO BE USED, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, FOR
ANY PROJECT WITHOUT THE WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION
OF JDO+ASSOCIATES, INC.
BUILDING PLAN
SC: 1/16" = 1'-0"
NORTH
BUILDING PLAN
FEB. 2020
A-3
2018.12
NEW INDUSTRIAL
BUILDING FOR
5850 CONDOR DRIVE
MOORPARK, CALIF.
4M INVESTMENT
CORPORATION
R .D .
R .D .R .D .R.D.
R.D.
304'-0"
236'-0"68'-0"
56'-0"184'-0"40'-0"48'-0"48'-0"48'-0"96'-2"62'-2 3/4"52'-0"50'-0"52'-0"50'-0"44'-0"72'-0"5'-0"
50'-0"6'-0"
UPUP
KEYNOTES
1) CONCRETE TILT-UP WALL PANEL , TYP. - SEE EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS FOR FINISH
2) EXTERIOR PLASTER SOFFIT OVER RECESS WITH CONTINUOUS VENTED SCREED ( BRUSHED ALUM .)
3) 1" THICK VITRO ATLANTICA SOLARBAN 60 (3) OVER CLEAR IN CLEAR ANODIZED OFFSET ALUMINUM STOREFRONT
WITH SILICONE VERTICAL JOINTS, TYP. AT RECESSED OPENINGS
4) 1" THICK VITRO ATLANTICA SOLARBAN 60 (3) OVER CLEAR IN CLEAR ANODIZED OFFSET ALUMINUM STOREFRONT
WITH SILICONE VERTICAL JOINTS, TYP. AT BUILDING SURFACE.
5) 3'-0" X 7'-0" STOREFRONT ENTRY DOORS (PAIR), TYP.
6) 3' X 7' METAL DOOR WITH PAINTED FINISH - COLOR TO BE DUNN EDWARDS NO. DE6375 "CASTLEROCK", TYP.
7) 9' X 12' ROLL UP TRUCK DOOR AT DOCK HIGH CONDITION WITH PAINTED FINISH -
COLOR TO BE DUNN EDWARDS NO. DE6375 "CASTLEROCK", TYP.
.
8) 12' X 14' ROLL UP TRUCK DOOR AT GRADE LEVEL WITH PAINTED FINISH -
COLOR TO BE DUNN EDWARDS NO. DE6375 "CASTLEROCK", TYP.
9) 3'-0" WIDE CANTILEVER METAL AWNING (OPEN) WITH PAINTED STEEL CHANNEL FASCIA AND S.S. MESH SCREENS, TYP.
FASCIA AND FRAMING PAINTED DUNN EDWARDS NO. DE6377 "BOAT ANCHOR"
10) Ø STD. PIPE COLUMN PAINTED SAFETY YELLOW TO 10'-0" A .F.F. & DUNN EDWARDS NO. DE6377 "BOAT ANCHOR"
ABOVE, TYP. - SEE STRUCTURAL PLANS
11) RECESSED TRUCK WELL WITH 42" HIGH CONCRETE TILT UP GUARDWALLS.
SLOPE TO DRAIN AND SUMP PUMP - SEE CIVIL PLANS, TYP.
12) 3'-6" HIGH SANDBLASTED & CLEARSEALED CONC. TILT UP GUARDWALL AT ENTRY STAIRS / DISABLED ACCESS RAMP.
13) ELECTRICAL ROOM - SEE ELECTRICAL PLANS
14) 10' X 12' CONCRETE TRANSFORMER PAD LOCATION - SEE ELECTRICAL PLANS
15) 4'-0" WIDE (MIN .) X 4" THICK REINFORCED CONC . WALK WITH BROOM FINISH AND SAW CUT CONTROL
JOINTS AT 4'-0" O.C., TYP. - PROVIDE TRUNCATED WARNING DEVICES AS REQUIRED .
16) 8' (W) X 3' (H) WALL MOUNTED PANELS (8" STAND-OFF) HORIZ . LANDSCAPE SCREEN (SILVER) BY "GREENSCREEN", TYP.
17) NEW "U - BICYCLE RACK WITH CROSS BAR" BY SAFE CYCLE OR EQ. ON REINFORCED CONC . PAD, TYP.
18) 3'-0" WIDE METAL CANOPY WITH STEEL CHANNEL FASCIA AND SOLID COVER - PAINTED DUNN EDWARDS NO.
DE6377 "BOAT ANCHOR", TYPICAL.
1
1
1
1
1
2
3
2
3
2
3
235 235
13
6
6
6
6
7
7
8
8
18
188
10
4 4
14
15 1212
15
16 161616
16
16
16
16
23 2 3
9 99
9
UPUPUP RAMP DN. @ ±6.667%LANDSCAPING,
TYPICAL
7 7
LANDSCAPING,
TYPICAL LANDSCAPING,
TYPICAL 0.5% SLOPE FLOOR0.5% SLOPE FLOOR4'-0"
TYP.4'-0"TYP.CONCRETE - SLOPE TO DRAIN
CONCRETE - SLOPE TO DRAIN1938
2039
2140
2241
From:Paul Minoo
To:Freddy Carrillo
Subject:5850 Condor Drive, Moorpark
Date:Wednesday, June 24, 2020 2:43:14 PM
To: City of Moorpark Planning Department
Dear Sirs:
The scope of the work from Edison Company has changed since Rule 20B is being implemented. The work that my
contractor needs to do does not change.
Therefore, the quotation remains the same.
Currently the estimate from Edison is $109,398 plus $585,000 from my contractor,
that totals to $694,398.
We are willing to pay $75,000 from Edison and $150,000 from the contractor,
that would be $225,000 in total.
Therefore, I am requesting the City of Moorpark to find a way to come up to a solution for the remaining balance of
$469,398.
Best Regards,
Paul Minoo
4M Investment Corporation
6222 Wilshire Blvd Suite 270
Los Angeles, CA 90048
tel # (213) 624-4040 x100
Fax # (213) 624-4050
Please consider only printing this email if necessary.
ATTACHMENT 4
2342
2443
2544
2645
Southern California Edison Company
Invoice Date:
SCE Contact:
Telephone:
Install - Billing Option:
Invoice Term:
Customer Name:
Customer Email:
District Address:
90 Days
GLENDOSHA INVESTMENT, LLC
06/17/2020
Rod D King6222 WILSHIRE BLVD STE 270
LOS ANGELES CA 90048 5193
3589 FOOTHILL DRIVE THOUSAND OAKS CA 91361
Document #7590309210
OTHER: This amount represents the total SCE other costs required to complete the work request. In most cases, this other
amount will consist of all additional requirements needed for completing the work request. This other amount typically consists
of items such as Added Facilities one time charges, contractor work, rights check, and permits.
MATERIAL: This amount represents the total SCE material required to complete the work request. In most cases, this material
amount will consist of construction material and any additional material required for completing the work request. The
construction material will typically consist of installation and service material such as transformers, cable, conductor, poles,
meters, riser, switches, fusing equipment, handholes, and cross-arms. All applicable material related overheads are also included
TOTAL TAX:
Description Amount
Service Request Number 2701122
Project Description TD1557408 & TD1620530 - RULE 20B OH/UG
$43,813.58
$78,909.35
$6,888.00
$129,610.93
$73,798.09
TAX: $74,535.03
$17,711.54
24.00%
$17,888.41
24.00%
$35,599.95
COMMENTS:
DEPOSITS:
TOTAL DEPOSITS:
$(55,812.84)
$0.00
$(7,500.00)
$(7,500.00)
$ 109,398.04
NET CONSTRUCTION BILLING / RELOCATION ADVANCE:
TOTAL PROJECT INVOICE AMOUNT:
* Enclosed are two copies of your invoice. Please return one copy of the invoice with your payment to Accounts Receivable in
the enclosed return-addressed envelope. The other copy of the invoice is for your records.
* ALL PRICES ARE APPLICABLE FOR A PERIOD OF 90 DAYS FROM THIS DATE AND ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE
THEREAFTER.
* All payments must be delivered by mail, an alternate postal method, or one of our electronic payment options. Walk-in
payments are no longer accepted at any SCE location, including Accounts Receivable.
* Please complete all applications and/or contracts and return to your planning office, using the enclosed return-addressed
envelope.
* Easement documents will be mailed directly to you from our Right of Way department. Please complete and return them as
soon as possible, as we will not be able to proceed with the project without clearance
.
TOTAL CREDITS:
LABOR: This amount represents the total SCE labor required to complete the work request. In most cases, this labor amount
will consist of construction labor and any additional labor required for completing the work request. The construction labor
amount will typically consist of installation and service labor required for the work request. The additional labor amount will
typically consist of labor for inspection, cable and equipment make-up, dead ending, traffic control, grounding, supervision, and
switching. All applicable labor related overheads for items such as the design, engineering, and project management are also
included in the total SCE labor amount.
This amount represents the total SCE credits required to complete the work request. In most cases, this credit
amount will consist of: Salvage Credit Depreciation Credit JPA Credit Overhead Equivalent Credit
1. ITCC on Applicant Furnished Tax Base (Taxable Amount):
Tax Rate:
Tax Amount:
2. ITCC on Net Construction (Less Non Taxable Amount) Tax Base (Taxable Amount):
Tax Rate:
Tax Amount:
Preliminary Design & Engineering Advance
Previous Payment
$(55,812.84)
TOTAL LABOR, MATERIAL, OTHER:
$73,798.09
CREDITS:
Design #:
1557408 - RULE 20B - UG INSTALLProduct #:
TD1557408 - RULE 20B - UG INSTALLDesign Description 1159220
5850 CONDOR DR MOORPARK CA 93021Project Location:
Invoice # 357388
2746
Southern California Edison Company
Invoice Date:
SCE Contact:
Telephone:
Install - Billing Option:
Invoice Term:
Customer Name:
Customer Email:
District Address:
90 Days
GLENDOSHA INVESTMENT, LLC
06/17/2020
Rod D King6222 WILSHIRE BLVD STE 270
LOS ANGELES CA 90048 5193
3589 FOOTHILL DRIVE THOUSAND OAKS CA 91361
Document #7590309210
* Call the Edison company at 1-800-655-4555 to make application for electrical service.
* An Edison Inspector must approve all underground systems. Please call your designated inspector 48 hours prior to
construction to schedule an inspection.
* By paying this invoice, customer acknowledges and agrees that if this project is canceled by customer for any reason or
customer does not proceed with the project completion.
* Any expense incurred by SCE, including, but not limited to, expenses related to engineering, inspection and construction,
prior to the project cancellation or completion will be deducted from any applicable refund due to the customer.
.
COMMENTS CONTINUED:
ADDITIONAL PAYMENT INSTRUCTIONS:
If paying by check, please follow instructions on payment stub
JP Morgan Chase Bank
New York, NY
ABA#: 021000021 - Acct#: 323-394434
SCE Taxpayer ID No. 95-1240335
Document #: 7590309210
SCE Contact:
*** Failure to properly identify your document number and SCE contact may
delay the application of funds and initiation of your project
Instructions for wire or ACH payments:
Special Instructions for overnight delivery methods:Southern California Edison
Attn: Accounts Receivable
8631 Rush Street G-53
Rosemead, CA 91770
Rod D King
6222 WILSHIRE BLVD STE 270
LOS ANGELES CA 90048 5193
Make check payable to Southern California Edison
Thank you for paying promptly
Payment
Stub
Please pay total amount now due:
Please detach and return payment stub with payment
GLENDOSHA INVESTMENT, LLC
$101,898.04
ATTN: Accounts Receivable
PO Box 800
Rosemead, CA 91771-001
Document #7590309210
2847
! " #$%$ $$ #&& ' &'
%$$%$
$(#$$($'%%&#'
) *
) %%&# + $,( & %($( # - . & / (& . 01
%&#
+$ $2$( $( #& $%&# &/32+$
($2$($(#&&#$&# (
&$ (&&#$&&*
%#$
%$$4
)
. #$ $ && %$%$ $ $+ $
& / +$ #&
$
+ 2$ $2 %$$
$2 #2 $/ %$
$+#
($ $
&/ ($2$( $(
##$# &/$(&
&
#( &/+$$+#(%#
%& &/($2$(#& $
. (& &2& # $,($2 (# %$%$$
5 (# #$
$2#2($62 &#( &/+$$+#4
) $2$( $+# ## # %%&# $
& /
($2$( $(
&& &&
%$+ & / $(& %%&#&
$4
) #$ %$
((& %$
#+ %$ $ $$ #
((&& 2$ %$ $
&& +6.*
7.%%&#&&% &##($$&3#($$(&
(
$+# #
%&2 ($2$(
(&2 ,(+& +$
.
(#$($#%%$
$$.
0. %%&# && ($ && % +(& $$$
$ #
,(%
#( (# 3 &#$&$ %$$
$ $5 $& $(#($
($(#($ #&(2 $52 %+
$#2 #5&&2 $%+2 $,($ ##
&& ($2$(
&& ##$# &8 %##
2 $,($
%%S%.
9. & && #
%& ($2$(2 +$ $( #& %$+ +$
&2$$2$$#$(# &.
#3#
# #&(2$$
$
$
7:;(0101
<71= 9=>.1?
<
7
!
2948
?. !$ $ $ #&$ $
((& & $%
($2$( $(#($ ($(#($ #2 % +(& #( (# 3 &#$&$
&& + &. %%&# $ 2$
& (% #
%& ($2$(
#$ $+ ##%# & & # +$ #
% %$ $ &&
&% &(($$#(%%$%%&#.
@.%%&##2$%%&#&&%$$
#$$2#2%%%$
$+#
($$
&8($2$($(
##$# &8
$(& &
#( &8+$$+#(%#
%& &8($2$(#&.
A.#$#(B#(& &.
:.#$#&&&&
(B#(##2$
#!(&# &
&$
$
$#3$#
B($#.
) ) %$$+3#(2$
$$
+$.
! "
-
C
D
!!
-
)
$
<
<
<
<
<
<
0
!
3049
ATTACHMENT 5
3150
3251
3352
3453
3554
3655
3756
Trac Engineering Transportaon Planning Parking Noise & Vibraon
Air Quality Global Climate Change Health Risk Assessment
5850 CONDOR DRIVE
FOCUSED TRAFFIC ANALYSIS
City of Moorpark
October 2, 2019
3857
<UNHIDDEN>
5850 CONDOR DRIVE
FOCUSED TRAFFIC ANALYSIS
City of Moorpark
October 2, 2019
prepared by
Perrie Ilercil, PE (AZ)
Giancarlo Ganddini, TE, PTP
GANDDINI GROUP, INC.
550 Parkcenter Drive, Suite 202
Santa Ana, CA 92705
(714) 795-3100 | www.ganddini.com 19-0186
3958
5850 Condor Drive
Focused Traffic Analysis
i 19-0186
TABLE OF CONTENTS
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
1. INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................................................... 1
Purpose and Objectives ................................................................................................................................................. 1
Project Description .......................................................................................................................................................... 1
Study Area ......................................................................................................................................................................... 1
Analysis Scenarios ........................................................................................................................................................... 1
2. METHODOLOGY ................................................................................................................................................... 4
Intersection Delay Methodology ................................................................................................................................. 4
Performance Standards .................................................................................................................................................. 5
Threshold of Significance .............................................................................................................................................. 5
3. EXISTING CONDITIONS ...................................................................................................................................... 6
Existing Roadway System .............................................................................................................................................. 6
Pedestrian Facilities ......................................................................................................................................................... 6
Transit Facilities ................................................................................................................................................................ 6
General Plan Context ..................................................................................................................................................... 6
Existing Roadway Volume ............................................................................................................................................. 6
Existing Intersection Level of Service......................................................................................................................... 7
4. PROJECT TRIP GENERATION/DISTRIBUTION .......................................................................................... 15
Project Trip Generation .............................................................................................................................................. 15
Project Distribution ...................................................................................................................................................... 15
Project Design Features .............................................................................................................................................. 15
5. FUTURE CONDITIONS ...................................................................................................................................... 22
Existing Plus Project Volumes ................................................................................................................................... 22
Intersection Levels of Service ................................................................................................................................... 22
Traffic Signal Warrant Analysis ................................................................................................................................. 22
Queueing Analysis ........................................................................................................................................................ 22
Significant Impact Evaluation..................................................................................................................................... 23
6. CONCLUSIONS .................................................................................................................................................... 28
Mitigation Measures .................................................................................................................................................... 28
General Recommendations ........................................................................................................................................ 28
APPENDICES
Appendix A Glossary
Appendix B Scoping Agreement
Appendix C General Plan Circulation Element Figures
Appendix D Intersection Turning Movement Count Worksheets
Appendix E Intersection Level of Service Worksheets
Appendix F Traffic Signal Warrant Worksheets
Draft4059
5850 Condor Drive
Focused Traffic Analysis
ii 19-0186
LIST OF TABLES
Table 1. Existing Intersection Levels of Service ........................................................................................................... 8
Table 2. Project Trip Generation ................................................................................................................................... 16
Table 3. Existing Plus Project Intersection Levels of Service ................................................................................ 26
Table 4. Westbound Vehicle Queue at Princeton Avenue/Condor Drive ........................................................ 27
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 1. Project Location Map .......................................................................................................................................... 2
Figure 2. Site Plan .................................................................................................................................................................. 3
Figure 3. Existing Lane Geometry and Intersection Traffic Controls ....................................................................... 9
Figure 4. Existing Pedestrian Facilities .......................................................................................................................... 10
Figure 5. City Transit Routes ........................................................................................................................................... 11
Figure 6. Existing Average Daily Traffic Volumes ...................................................................................................... 12
Figure 7. Existing AM Peak Hour Intersection Turning Movement Volumes ..................................................... 13
Figure 8. Existing PM Peak Hour Intersection Turning Movement Volumes ..................................................... 14
Figure 9. Project Trip Distribution (Cars) ...................................................................................................................... 17
Figure 10. Project Trip Distribution (Trucks) .................................................................................................................. 18
Figure 11. Project Average Daily Traffic Volumes ....................................................................................................... 19
Figure 12. Project AM Peak Hour Intersection Turning Movement Volumes ...................................................... 20
Figure 13. Project PM Peak Hour Intersection Turning Movement Volumes ...................................................... 21
Figure 14. Existing Plus Project AM Peak Hour Intersection Turning Movement Volumes ............................. 24
Figure 15. Existing Plus Project PM Peak Hour Intersection Turning Movement Volumes .............................. 25 Draft4160
5850 Condor Drive
Focused Traffic Analysis
ES-1 19-0186
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The 3.465-acre project site is located at 5850 Condor Drive in the City of Moorpark. The project site is
currently undeveloped. The proposed project consists of developing the project site with a 48,211 square
foot new industrial building with 115 stalls of vehicle parking and 10 bicycle parking. The proposed project
will provide two full access driveways on Condor Drive.
EXISTING CONDITIONS
The study intersections currently operate within acceptable Levels of Service (C or better) during the peak
hours for Existing conditions, with the exception of the following study intersection (see Table 1):
Princeton Avenue at Condor Drive - #1 (AM peak hour - LOS D, PM peak hour - LOS F)
Since the intersection of Princeton Avenue at Condor Drive is one-way stop controlled, the Level of Service
is based on the movement with the worst (highest) delay value, or in this case the westbound left-turn
movement. The uncontrolled through movements along Princeton Avenue are free-flow and operate at Level
of Service A. The westbound right-turn lane currently operates at Level of Service C or better during the AM
and PM peak hours.
PROJECT TRIPS
The proposed project is forecast to generate approximately 239 daily vehicle trips, including 34 vehicle trips
during the AM peak hour and 30 vehicle trips during the PM peak hour. In Passenger Car Equivalent (PCE)
trips, the project is forecast to generate approximately 287 daily PCE trips, including 41 PCE trips during the
AM peak hour and 36 PCE trips during the PM peak hour (see Table 2).
FORECAST CONDITIONS
The westbound left-turn movement at the intersection of Princeton Avenue at Condor Drive is forecast to
continue operating at deficient Levels of Service (D/F) with the addition of project-generated trips; all other
movements are forecast to continue operating within acceptable Levels of Service (C or better) during the
peak hours.
The unsignalized study intersection of Princeton Avenue at Condor Drive does not satisfy the California
MUTCD peak hour volume warrant (Warrant 3) for Existing or Existing Plus Project conditions.
Based on the results of the Level of Service, peak hour signal warrant, and queue length analyses, the proposed
project is forecast to result in no significant impacts at the study intersections for Existing Plus Project
conditions during the AM and PM peak hours.
MITIGATION MEASURES
No off-site mitigation measure improvements were identified since the proposed project is forecast to result
in no significant traffic impacts at the study intersections for the scenarios analyzed.
Draft4261
5850 Condor Drive
Focused Traffic Analysis
1 19-0186
1. INTRODUCTION
This section describes the purpose of this traffic impact analysis, project location, proposed development, and
study area. Figure 1 shows the project location map and Figure 2 illustrates the project site plan.
PURPOSE AND OBJECTIVES
The purpose of this study is to provide an assessment of traffic operations resulting from development of the
proposed project and to identify measures necessary to mitigate potentially significant traffic impacts as
requested in the pre-application review letter dated October 10, 2018 from the City of Moorpark.
This report summarizes our methodology, analysis, and findings. Although this is a technical report, effort has
been made to write the report clearly and concisely. A glossary is provided within Appendix A to assist the
reader with terms related to transportation planning.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Figure 1 shows the project location map. The 3.465-acre project site is located at 5850 Condor Drive in the
City of Moorpark. The project site is currently undeveloped.
The site plan is illustrated on Figure 2. The proposed project consists of developing the project site with a
48,211 square foot new industrial building with 115 stalls of vehicle parking and 10 bicycle parking. The
proposed project will provide two full access driveways on Condor Drive.
STUDY AREA
The study area and other parameters of the analysis were identified based on scoping input from City of
Moorpark staff (see Appendix B). The study area consists of the following study intersections and project
driveways:
Study Intersections Jurisdiction
1. Princeton Avenue (NS) at Condor Drive (EW) Moorpark
2. Avenida Colonia (NS) at Condor Drive (EW) Moorpark
ANALYSIS SCENARIOS
This study evaluates the following analysis scenarios for typical weekday AM and PM peak hour conditions:
Existing
Existing Plus Project
1Draft 4362
2Draft 4463
3Draft 4564
5850 Condor Drive
Focused Traffic Analysis
4 19-0186
2. METHODOLOGY
This section describes the analysis methodologies used to assess transportation facility performance as
adopted by the respective jurisdictional agencies.
Analysis of signalized intersections within the City of Moorpark is based on the Intersection Capacity
Utilization (ICU) methodology. Since both study intersections are unsignalized, performance of the
unsignalized study intersections was assessed using the intersection delay methodology based on the
procedures contained in the Highway Capacity Manual (Transportation Research Board, 6th Edition) [“HCM”].
INTERSECTION DELAY METHODOLOGY
The HCM intersection delay methodology considers the traffic volume and distribution of movements, traffic
composition, geometric characteristics, and gap times/signalization details (as applicable) to calculate the
average control delay per vehicle and corresponding Level of Service. Control delay is defined as the portion
of delay attributed to the intersection traffic control (such as a traffic signal or stop sign) and includes initial
deceleration, queue move-up time, stopped delay, and final acceleration delay. The intersection control delay
is then correlated to Level of Service based on the following thresholds:
Level of
Service
Intersection Control Delay
(Seconds / Vehicle)
Description
Signalized
Intersection
Unsignalized
Intersection
A ≤ 10.0 ≤ 10.0
EXCELLENT OPERATION. All approaches to the
intersection appear quite open, turning movements are
easily made and nearly all drivers find freedom of
operation.
B > 10.0 to ≤ 20.0 > 10.0 to ≤ 15.0
VERY GOOD OPERATION: Many drivers begin to feel
somewhat restricted within platoons of vehicles. This
represents stable flow. An approach to an intersection
may occasionally be fully utilized and traffic queues start
to form.
C > 20.0 to ≤ 35.0 > 15.0 to ≤ 25.0
GOOD OPERATION. Occasionally backups may develop
behind turning vehicles. Most drivers feel somewhat
restricted.
D > 35.0 to ≤ 55.0 > 25.0 to ≤ 35.0
FAIR OPERATION. There are no long-standing traffic
queues. This level is typically associated with design
practice for peak periods.
E > 55.0 to ≤ 80.0 > 35.0 to ≤ 50.0 POOR OPERATION. Some long-standing vehicular
queues develop on critical approaches.
F > 80.0 > 50.0
FORCED FLOW. Represents jammed conditions.
Backups from locations downstream or on the cross
street may restrict or prevent movements of vehicles out
of the intersection approach lanes; therefore, volumes
carried are not predictable. Potential for stop-and-go
type traffic flow.
Source: Transportation Research Board, Highway Capacity Manual (6th Edition).
4Draft 4665
5850 Condor Drive
Focused Traffic Analysis
5 19-0186
Level of Service is used to qualitatively describe the performance of a roadway facility, ranging from Level of
Service A (free-flow conditions) to Level of Service F (extreme congestion and system failure). At intersections
with traffic signal or all way stop control, Level of Service is determined by the average control delay for the
overall intersection. At intersections with cross street stop control (i.e., one- or two-way stop control), Level
of Service is determined by the average control delay for the worst individual movement (or movements
sharing a single lane). The intersection delay analysis was performed using the Vistro software and default
values recommended in the HCM.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS
The City of Moorpark has established a minimum acceptable Level of Service C for peak hour intersection
operations.
THRESHOLD OF SIGNIFICANCE
Many jurisdictions in the region, including the City of Moorpark do not have established significant impact
thresholds for unsignalized intersections. For this traffic impact analysis, a project impact at an unsignalized
intersection is considered significant if the addition of project-generated trips is forecast to cause or worsen
Level of Service D, E or F and a peak hour traffic signal warrant is satisfied (per California Manual on Uniform
Traffic Control Devices).
If a project is forecast to cause a significant impact, feasible mitigation measures that will reduce the impact
to a less than significant level will be identified. Mitigation measures can be in many forms, including the
addition of lanes, traffic control modification, or demand management measures. If no feasible mitigation
measures can be identified for a significantly impacted facility, the impact will remain significant and
unavoidable and a statement of overriding considerations will be required.
5Draft 4766
5850 Condor Drive
Focused Traffic Analysis
6 19-0186
3. EXISTING CONDITIONS
EXISTING ROADWAY SYSTEM
Figure 3 identifies the lane geometry and intersection traffic controls for Existing conditions based on a field
survey of the study area. The key north-south roadway providing local circulation is Princeton Avenue. The
key east-west roadway providing local circulation is Condor Drive.
Princeton Avenue is a two-lane undivided to four-lane divided roadway in the study area. North of Condor
Drive, Princeton Avenue is a four-lane roadway with a raised median and intermittent left turn lanes.
South/west of Condo, Princeton Avenue is a two-lane undivided roadway. Princeton Avenue is classified as a
Rural Collector (2-4 lanes divided roadway with 54-64 feet of pavement width) in the City of Moorpark
General Plan. On-street parking is prohibited in the project vicinity. Princeton Avenue is indicated as a Class
III Bike Route (indicated by signs only) in the City of Moorpark General Plan. A dedicated on-street bicycle
lane is provided north of Condor Drive on the eastside of the roadway. Sidewalks are provided on both sides
of the roadway north of Condor Drive and on the west side of the roadway south of Condor Drive. The
posted speed limit of 40 miles per hour north of Condor Drive and 35 miles per hour south of Condor Drive;
the advisory speed is reduced to 30 miles per hour through the curve at the intersection of Condor Drive.
The Princeton Avenue Improvement Project will improve 4,000 feet of roadway from Condor Drive to the
Sharma Construction property. The improvements include roadway widening from 28 to 54 feet to provide
standard width lanes, a continuous left turn lane median, bike lanes, sidewalks, landscaped parkways, drainage
improvements, street lights, and screening/retaining walls where necessary.
Condor Drive is a two-lane undivided roadway in the study area. Condor Drive is an unclassified roadway in
the City of Moorpark General Plan. On-street parking is prohibited on both sides of the roadway in the study
area. Dedicated on-street bicycle lanes are not provided in the study area. Sidewalks are generally provided
on both sides of the roadway. The posted speed limit is 25 miles per hour.
PEDESTRIAN FACILITIES
Existing pedestrian facilities in the project vicinity are shown on Figure 4. As shown on Figure 4, a pedestrian
sidewalk is currently provided along the project site west frontage.
TRANSIT FACILITIES
Figure 5 shows the existing transit routes available in the project vicinity. As shown in Figure 5, the study area
is currently served by Route 1 and 2 along Princeton Avenue.
GENERAL PLAN CONTEXT
The City of Moorpark General Plan Circulation Element roadway classifications map and standard roadways
cross-section figure show the nature and extent of arterial and collector highways that are needed to
adequately serve the ultimate development depicted by the Land Use Element of the General Plan.
Additionally, the City of Moorpark General Plan Bike Route shows existing and proposed bike routes and
classifications. The City of Moorpark General Plan Circulation Map, standard Roadway Cross-sections and
Bike Routes are included in Appendix C.
EXISTING ROADWAY VOLUME
Figure 6 shows the Existing average daily traffic volumes. The Existing average daily traffic volumes have been
factored from peak hour intersection turning movement volumes using the following formula for each
intersection leg:
6Draft 4867
5850 Condor Drive
Focused Traffic Analysis
7 19-0186
Evening Peak Hour (Approach Volume + Exit Volume) x 10 = Leg Volume.
Existing peak hour intersection turning movement volumes are based upon AM peak period and PM peak
period intersection turning movement counts obtained in September 2019 during typical weekday conditions.
The AM peak period was counted between 7:00 AM and 9:00 AM and the PM peak period was counted
between 4:00 PM and 6:00 PM. The actual peak hour within the peak period is the four consecutive 15-
minute periods with the highest total volume when all movements are added together. Thus, the weekday PM
peak hour at one intersection may be 4:45 PM to 5:45 PM if the four consecutive 15-minute periods have
the highest combined volume. Intersection turning movement count worksheets are provided in Appendix D.
Figure 7 and Figure 8 show the Existing AM peak hour and PM peak hour intersection turning movement
volumes, respectively.
EXISTING INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE
The study intersection Levels of Service for Existing conditions have been calculated and are shown in Table
1. Level of Service calculation worksheets are provided in Appendix E.
As shown in Table 1, the study intersections currently operate within acceptable Levels of Service (C or better)
during the peak hours for Existing conditions, with the exception of the following study intersection:
Princeton Avenue at Condor Drive - #1 (AM peak hour - LOS D, PM peak hour - LOS F)
Since the intersection of Princeton Avenue at Condor Drive is one-way stop controlled, the Level of Service
is based on the movement with the worst (highest) delay value, or in this case the westbound left-turn
movement. The uncontrolled through movements along Princeton Avenue are free-flow and operate at Level
of Service A. The westbound right-turn lane currently operates at Level of Service C or better during the AM
and PM peak hours.
7Draft 4968
Delay2 LOS3 Delay2 LOS3
1. Princeton Ave at Condor Drive 0.61 A 1.62 A
1. ‐ Worst Movement (Westbound Left)31.1 D 58.8 F
2. Avenida Colonia at Condor Drive CSS 9.1 A 8.8 A
Notes:
(1)
(2)
(3)
Delay is shown in seconds per vehicle. For intersections with cross street stop control, LOS is based on average delay of the worst individual
lane (or movements sharing a lane).
LOS = Level of Service
Table 1
Existing Intersection Levels of Service
AM Peak Hour PM Peak HourTraffic
Control1Study IntersectionID
CSS = Cross Street Stop
CSS
5850 Cordor Drive
Focused Traffic Analysis
19‐01868Draft5069
9Draft 5170
10Draft 5271
11Draft5372
12Draft 5473
13Draft 5574
14Draft 5675
5850 Condor Drive
Focused Traffic Analysis
15 19-0186
4. PROJECT TRIP GENERATION/DISTRIBUTION
This section describes how project trip generation, trip distribution, and trip assignment forecasts were
developed. The forecast project volumes are illustrated on figures contained in this section.
PROJECT TRIP GENERATION
Table 2 shows the project trip generation based upon rates obtained from the Institute of Transportation
Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual (10th Edition, 2017). The project trips have been categorized into
passenger cars and trucks based on truck trip data contained in the ITE Trip Generation Handbook (3rd Edition,
2017). Additionally, the project generated truck trips have been converted to Passenger Car Equivalent (PCE)
trips based on a PCE factor of 2.0 for trucks.
As shown in Table 2, the proposed project is forecast to generate approximately 239 daily vehicle trips,
including 34 vehicle trips during the AM peak hour and 30 vehicle trips during the PM peak hour. As also
shown in Table 2, the project is forecast to generate approximately 287 daily PCE trips, including 41 PCE trips
during the AM peak hour and 36 PCE trips during the PM peak hour.
PROJECT DISTRIBUTION
Figure 9 and Figure 10 illustrate the forecast directional distribution patterns of the project generated
passenger car and truck trips. Passenger car trips are generally more localized with residential or commercial
origin/destination points, whereas truck trips generally have a more regional distribution travelling to/from
other industrial uses or ports/terminals via the freeway. The project trip distribution patterns are based on
review of existing volume data, surrounding land uses, designated truck routes, and the local and regional
roadway facilities in the project vicinity.
Based on the identified project trip generation and distributions, project average daily traffic volumes have
been calculated and shown on Figure 11. The project AM and PM peak hour intersection turning movement
volumes for project opening year (2021) conditions are depicted on Figure 12 and Figure 13.
PROJECT DESIGN FEATURES
In accordance with standard conditions of approval, this analysis assumes the following improvements will be
constructed by the project to provide project site access:
The proposed project will provide roadway, sidewalk, signing, striping, lighting, curb/gutter and
landscaping improvements to the ultimate half-section width of adjacent roadways along the property
frontage.
The proposed project will provide two full access driveways at Condor Drive in accordance with applicable
City of Moorpark standard plans.
15Draft 5776
Source1 % In % Out Total % In % Out Total Daily
ITE 110 88% 12%
0.70 13% 87%
0.63 4.96
Quantity (TSF)In Out Total In Out Total Daily
Light Industrial 48.211
Cars (80%)24 3 27 3 21 24 191
Trucks (20%)3 61715648
TOTAL VEHICLE TRIPS GENERATED 30 4 34 4 26 30 239
Quantity (TSF)In Out Total In Out Total Daily
Light Industrial 48.211
Cars 24 3 27 3 21 24 191
Trucks (PCE Factor = 2.0)12 2 14 2 10 12 96
TOTAL PCE TRIPS GENERATED 36 5 41 5 31 36 287
Notes:
(1)
(2)TSF = Thousand Square Feet
(3)
AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
Land Use/Vehicle Type
ITE = Institute of Transportation Engineers, Trip Generation Manual (10th Edition, 2017); ### = Land Use Code.
Per ITE Trip Generation Handbook (3rd Edition, 2017), average truck trips for industrial park uses is approximately 13 percent. The percent of
trucks for this analysis is rounded up to 20% to provide a conservative analysis.
Passenger Car Equivalent (PCE) Trips Generated
Table 2
Project Trip Generation
Trip Generation Rates per TSF2
AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
Land Use/Vehicle Type
Light Industrial
Vehicle Trips Generated
AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
Land Use/Vehicle Type
5850 Cordor Drive
Focused Traffic Analysis
19‐018616Draft5877
17Draft 5978
18Draft 6079
19Draft 6180
20Draft 6281
21Draft 6382
5850 Condor Drive
Focused Traffic Analysis
22 19-0186
5. FUTURE CONDITIONS
This section presents traffic volume and operational forecasts for future conditions with the proposed project.
Forecast study area volumes are illustrated on figures contained in this section. Detailed intersection Level of
Service calculation worksheets are provided in Appendix E.
EXISTING PLUS PROJECT VOLUMES
The roadway volumes for Existing Plus Project conditions were developed by adding the project-generated
trips to existing traffic volumes. Existing Plus Project AM and PM peak hour intersection turning movement
volumes are shown on Figure 14 and Figure 15.
INTERSECTION LEVELS OF SERVICE
The intersection Levels of Service for Existing Plus Project conditions are shown in Table 3. As shown Table
3, the study intersections are projected to operate within acceptable Levels of Service (C or better) during the
peak hours for Existing Plus Project conditions, with the exception of the following study intersection that is
forecast to continue operating at deficient Levels of Service.
Princeton Avenue at Condor Drive - #1 (AM peak hour - LOS D, PM peak hour - LOS F)
Since the intersection of Princeton Avenue at Condor Drive is one-way stop controlled, the Level of Service
is based on the movement with the worst (highest) delay value, or in this case the westbound left-turn
movement. The westbound right-turn lane currently operates at Level of Service C or better during the AM
and PM peak hours. The uncontrolled through movements along Princeton Avenue are free-flow and operate
at Level of Service A.
TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANT ANALYSIS
The potential need for installation of a traffic signal at the deficient unsignalized study intersection was
evaluated based on the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (“California MUTCD”,
November 2014), Section 4C-101, peak hour volume warrant (Warrant 3). Traffic signal warrant worksheets
are provided in Appendix F.
The unsignalized study intersection of Princeton Avenue at Condor Drive does not satisfy the California
MUTCD peak hour volume warrant (Warrant 3) for Existing or Existing Plus Project conditions.
QUEUEING ANALYSIS
Table 4 summarizes the 95th-percentile queue lengths for westbound movements at the intersection of
Princeton Avenue and Condor Drive. Vehicle queues were evaluated based on the HCM back-of-queue
methodology (see Level of Service worksheets in Appendix E).
As shown in Table 4, the calculated queue length for the westbound left turn movement is currently 40 feet
without the proposed project, which represents a typical queue of one to two vehicles. With the addition of
project-generated trips (i.e., Existing Plus Project conditions), the calculated queue length for the westbound
left turn movement is approximately 50 feet, which represents a typical queue of two vehicles. Therefore, the
proposed project is forecast to result in a nominal impact on vehicle queues for the deficient westbound left
turn movement.
Additionally, the distance on Condor Drive between Princeton Avenue and Avenida Colonia is approximately
55 feet. Therefore, the vehicle queues for the westbound approach Condor Drive at Princeton Avenue can
22Draft 6483
5850 Condor Drive
Focused Traffic Analysis
23 19-0186
be accommodated within the available stacking distance without obstructing vehicular movements at the
adjacent intersection of Avenida Colonia and Condor Drive.
SIGNIFICANT IMPACT EVALUATION
The intersection of Princeton Avenue at Condor Drive currently operates at deficient Levels of Service (D/F)
during the AM and PM peak hours based on the westbound left-turn movement only.
The westbound left-turn movement at the intersection of Princeton Avenue at Condor Drive is forecast to
continue operating at deficient Levels of Service (D/F) with the addition of project-generated trips; all other
movements are forecast to continue operating within acceptable Levels of Service (C or better) during the
peak hours.
Although the intersection of Princeton Avenue at Condor Drive is forecast to continue operating deficient
Levels of Service during the peak hours, the project-related impact is considered less than significant since
the peak hour traffic signal warrant is not satisfied.
Based on the results of the Level of Service, peak hour signal warrant, and queue length analyses, the proposed
project is forecast to result in no significant impacts at the study intersections for Existing Plus Project
conditions during the AM and PM peak hours.
23Draft 6584
Delay2 LOS3 Delay2 LOS3 Delay2 LOS3 Delay2 LOS3
1 Princeton Ave at Condor Drive 0.61 A 1.62 A 0.86 A 2.29 A
1. ‐ Worst Movement (Westbound Left)31.1 D 58.8 F 34.6 D 66.8 F
2. Avenida Colonia at Condor Drive CSS 9.1 A 8.8 A 9.3 A 8.9 A
3. West Project Access at Condor Drive CSS ‐‐9.2 A 9.2 A
4. East Project Access at Condor Drive CSS ‐‐9.2 A 9.1 A
Notes:
(1) CSS = Cross Street Stop
(2)
(3) LOS = Level of Service
Study IntersectionID
Delay is shown in seconds per vehicle. For intersections with cross street stop control, LOS is based on average delay of the worst
individual lane (or movements sharing a lane).
Table 3
Existing Plus Project Intersection Levels of Service
Existing Existing Plus Project
AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
Traffic
Control1
CSS
5850 Cordor Drive
Focused Traffic Analysis
19‐018624Draft6685
Storage
Length
ID Approach Lane
(Feet)1 AM PM AM PM Existing Plus Project
1. Princeton Ave at Condor Drive Westbound Left 55 <20 40 <20 50 YES YES
Westbound Right 55 <20 <20 <20 <20 YES YES
Notes:
(1)
(2) Queueing length rounded up to the nearest 5 feet.
Intersection
Distance between Princton Avenue and Avenida Colonia.
Table 4
Westbound Vehicle Queues at Princeton Avenue/Condor Drive
Peak Hour 95th‐Percentile Queue Length (Feet)2
Adequate Storage
Provided
Existing
Existing Plus Project
5850 Cordor Drive
Focused Traffic Analysis
19‐018625Draft6786
26Draft 6887
27Draft 6988
5850 Condor Drive
Focused Traffic Analysis
28 19-0186
6. CONCLUSIONS
MITIGATION MEASURES
No off-site mitigation measure improvements were identified since the proposed project is forecast to result
in no significant traffic impacts at the study intersections for the scenarios analyzed.
GENERAL RECOMMENDATIONS
On-site and site-adjacent improvements including project driveways, roadway design, traffic signing and
striping, and traffic control improvements relating to the proposed project should be constructed in
accordance with applicable engineering standards and to the satisfaction of the City of Moorpark engineering
staff.
Sight distance at project access points should comply with applicable City of Moorpark/California Department
of Transportation sight distance standards. The final grading, landscaping, and street improvement plans
should demonstrate that sight distance standards are met.
Off-street parking should be provided to meet City of Moorpark Municipal Code requirements.
As is the case for any roadway design, the City of Moorpark should periodically review traffic operations in
the vicinity of the project once the project is constructed to assure that the traffic operations are satisfactory.
28Draft 7089
5850 Condor Drive
Focused Traffic Analysis
29 19-0186
APPENDICES
Appendix A Glossary
Appendix B Scoping Agreement
Appendix C General Plan Circulation Element Figures
Appendix D Intersection Turning Movement Count Worksheets
Appendix E Intersection Level of Service Worksheets
Appendix F Traffic Signal Warrant Worksheets
Apx-1Draft 7190
APPENDIX A
GLOSSARY
Apx-2Draft 7291
GLOSSARY OF PARKING/TRANSPORTATION TERMS
ACRONYMS
AC Acres
ADT Average Daily Traffic
Caltrans California Department of Transportation
DU Dwelling Unit
ICU Intersection Capacity Utilization
LOS Level of Service
PCE Passenger Car Equivalent
TSF Thousand Square Feet
V/C Volume/Capacity
VMT Vehicle Miles Traveled
TERMS
AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC: The average 24-hour volume for a stated period divided by the number of days
in that period. For example, Annual Average Daily Traffic is the total volume during a year divided by 365
days.
BANDWIDTH: The number of seconds of green time available for through traffic in a signal progression.
BOTTLENECK: A point of constriction along a roadway that limits the amount of traffic that can proceed
downstream from its location.
CAPACITY: The maximum number of vehicles that can be reasonably expected to pass over a given section
of a lane or a roadway in a given time period.
CHANNELIZATION: The separation or regulation of conflicting traffic movements into definite paths of travel
by the use of pavement markings, raised islands, or other suitable means to facilitate the safe and orderly
movements of both vehicles and pedestrians.
CLEARANCE INTERVAL: Nearly same as yellow time. If there is an all red interval after the end of a yellow,
then that is also added into the clearance interval.
CONTROL DELAY: The component of delay, typically expressed in seconds per vehicle, resulting from the
type of traffic control at an intersection. Control delay is measured by comparison with the uncontrolled
condition; it includes delay incurred by slowing down, stopping/waiting, and speeding up.
CORDON: An imaginary line around an area across which vehicles, persons, or other items are counted (in
and out).
CORNER SIGHT DISTANCE: The minimum sight distance required by the driver of a vehicle to cross or enter
the lanes of the major roadway without requiring approaching traffic travelling at a given speed to radically
alter their speed or trajectory. Corner sight distance is measured from the driver’s eye at 42 inches above the
pavement to an object height of 36 inches above the pavement in the center of the nearest approach lane.
CYCLE LENGTH: The time period in seconds required for a traffic signal to complete one full cycle of
indications.
CUL-DE-SAC: A local street open at one end only and with special provisions for turning around.
Apx-3Draft 7392
DAILY CAPACITY: A theoretical value representing the daily traffic volume that will typically result in a peak
hour volume equal to the capacity of the roadway.
DELAY: The time consumed while traffic is impeded in its movement by some element over which it has no
control, usually expressed in seconds per vehicle.
DEMAND RESPONSIVE SIGNAL: Same as traffic-actuated signal.
DENSITY: The number of vehicles occupying in a unit length of the through traffic lanes of a roadway at any
given instant. Usually expressed in vehicles per mile.
DETECTOR: A device that responds to a physical stimulus and transmits a resulting impulse to the signal
controller.
DESIGN SPEED: A speed selected for purposes of design. Features of a highway, such as curvature,
superelevation, and sight distance (upon which the safe operation of vehicles is dependent) are correlated to
design speed.
DIRECTIONAL SPLIT: The percent of traffic in the peak direction at any point in time.
DIVERSION: The rerouting of peak hour traffic to avoid congestion.
FORCED FLOW: Opposite of free flow.
FREE FLOW: Volumes are well below capacity. Vehicles can maneuver freely and travel is unimpeded by
other traffic.
GAP: Time or distance between successive vehicles in a traffic stream, rear bumper to front bumper.
HEADWAY: Time or distance spacing between successive vehicles in a traffic stream, front bumper to front
bumper.
INTERCONNECTED SIGNAL SYSTEM: A number of intersections that are connected to achieve signal
progression.
LEVEL OF SERVICE: A qualitative measure of a number of factors, which include speed and travel time, traffic
interruptions, freedom to maneuver, safety, driving comfort and convenience, and operating costs.
LOOP DETECTOR: A vehicle detector consisting of a loop of wire embedded in the roadway, energized by
alternating current and producing an output circuit closure when passed over by a vehicle.
MINIMUM ACCEPTABLE GAP: Smallest time headway between successive vehicles in a traffic stream into
which another vehicle is willing and able to cross or merge.
MULTI-MODAL: More than one mode; such as automobile, bus transit, rail rapid transit, and bicycle
transportation modes.
OFFSET: The time interval in seconds between the beginning of green at one intersection and the beginning
of green at an adjacent intersection.
PLATOON: A closely grouped component of traffic that is composed of several vehicles moving, or standing
ready to move, with clear spaces ahead and behind.
Apx-4Draft 7493
PASSENGER CAR EQUIVALENT (PCE): A metric used to assess the impact of larger vehicles, such as trucks,
recreational vehicles, and buses, by converting the traffic volume of larger vehicles to an equivalent number
of passenger cars.
PEAK HOUR: The 60 consecutive minutes with the highest number of vehicles.
PRETIMED SIGNAL: A type of traffic signal that directs traffic to stop and go on a predetermined time
schedule without regard to traffic conditions. Also, fixed time signal.
PROGRESSION: A term used to describe the progressive movement of traffic through several signalized
intersections.
QUEUE: The number of vehicles waiting at a service area such as a traffic signal, stop sign, or access gate.
QUEUE LENGTH: The length of vehicle queue, typically expressed in feet, waiting at a service area such as a
traffic signal, stop sign, or access gate.
SCREEN-LINE: An imaginary line or physical feature across which all trips are counted, normally to verify the
validity of mathematical traffic models.
SHARED/RECIPROCAL PARKING AGREEMENT: A written binding document executed between property
owners to provide a designated number of off-street parking stalls within a designated area to be available for
specified businesses or land uses.
SIGHT DISTANCE: The continuous length of roadway visible to a driver or roadway user.
SIGNAL CYCLE: The time period in seconds required for one complete sequence of signal indications.
SIGNAL PHASE: The part of the signal cycle allocated to one or more traffic movements.
STACKING DISTANCE: The length of area available behind a service area, such as a traffic signal or gate, for
vehicle queueing to occur.
STARTING DELAY: The delay experienced in initiating the movement of queued traffic from a stop to an
average running speed through an intersection.
STOPPING SIGHT DISTANCE: The minimum distance required by the driver of a vehicle on the major roadway
travelling at a given speed to bring the vehicle to a stop after an object on the road becomes visible. Stopping
sight distance is measured from the driver’s eye at 42 inches above the pavement to an object height of 6
inches above the pavement.
TRAFFIC-ACTUATED SIGNAL: A type of traffic signal that directs traffic to stop and go in accordance with
the demands of traffic, as registered by the actuation of detectors.
TRIP: The movement of a person or vehicle from one location (origin) to another (destination). For example,
from home to store to home is two trips, not one.
TRIP-END: One end of a trip at either the origin or destination (i.e., each trip has two trip-ends). A trip-end
occurs when a person, object, or message is transferred to or from a vehicle.
TRIP GENERATION RATE: The quantity of trips produced and/or attracted by a specific land use stated in
terms of units such as per dwelling, per acre, and per 1,000 square feet of floor space.
TRUCK: A vehicle having dual tires on one or more axles, or having more than two axles.
Apx-5Draft 7594
TURNING RADIUS: The circular arc formed by the smallest turning path radius of the front outside tire of a
vehicle, such as that performed by a U-turn maneuver. This is based on the length and width of the wheel
base as well as the steering mechanism of the vehicle.
UNBALANCED FLOW: Heavier traffic flow in one direction than the other. On a daily basis, most facilities
have balanced flow. During the peak hours, flow is seldom balanced in an urban area.
VEHICLE MILES OF TRAVEL: A measure of the amount of usage of a section of highway, obtained by
multiplying the average daily traffic by length of facility in miles.
Apx-6Draft 7695
APPENDIX B
SCOPING AGREEMENT
Apx-7Draft 7796
2
From:FreddyCarrillo<fcarrillo@MoorparkCA.gov>
Sent:Friday,September13,20193:48PM
To:PerrieIlercil<perrie@ganddini.com>
Subject:RE:5850CondorDr201801TrafficScopingAgreement
Hello,
Ithinkwelostconnection.
Thestudylooksok,however,anapplicationfortheindustrial buildinghasnotbeensubmi tted.Wewillreviewthis
reportonceanapplicationisformallysubmitted.
Freddy A. Carrillo
Associate Planner II
Community Development Department
City of Moorpark | 799 Moorpark Avenue|Moorpark, CA 93021
805.517.6224|fax: 805.532.2540| fcarrillo@moorparkca.gov
www.moorparkca.gov
From: Perrie Ilercil [mailto:perrie@ganddini.com]
Sent: Friday, September 13, 2019 3:43 PM
To: Freddy Carrillo
Subject: RE: 5850 Condor Dr 2018-01 Traffic Scoping Agreement
Seeattachment,thankyou
From:PerrieIlercil
Sent:Friday,September13,20193:23PM
To:FreddieCarillo(FCarillo@Moorparkca.gov)<FCarillo@Moorparkca.gov>
Cc:Giancarlo@ganddini.com
Subject:5850CondorDr201801TrafficScopingAgreement
HiFreddie,
YouandIhavebeenplayingphonetag.
SeetheattachedTrafficScopingagreementforthefocusedt rafficimpactanalysispertheOct10,2018letterto
DaveOsbornPreapplication201801.
Thisisbeingwrittenasasmallfocusedstudywiththetwo intersectionspecifiedinthePreapplicationreviewletter.
Ifthereareanyitemsthatshouldbeincludedforthet rafficstudyorwouldbepermanentforthepublicapproval
process,pleasemakenoteofitandret urnemailwiththosecomments.
IftheCityhasdevelopednewTrafficImpactGuidelinest osupersedethe1992GeneralPlanCirculationElement
document,pleaseprovideit.
Sincerely,
Perrie Ilercil, PE(AZ)
SeniorEngineer
Apx-8Draft 7897
550 Parkcenter Drive, Suite 202, Santa Ana, California 92705 | 714 795 3100 | www.ganddini.com
ORANGE COUNTY RIVERSIDE PALO ALTO
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING
TO: Freddie Carrillo, City Assistant Planner | CITY OF MOORPARK PARK
FROM: Perrie Ilercil, PE (AZ) | GANDDINI GROUP, INC.
DATE: September 12, 2019
SUBJECT: 5850 Condor Drive Project Traffic Study Assumptions
19‐0186
INTRODUCTION
The purpose of this scoping document is to outline the proposed focused traffic analysis parameters and
assumptions for the 5850 Condor Drive Project (Pre‐application number 2018‐01) for review/concurrence
by City of Moorpark Park staff.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Figure 1 shows the project location map. The 3.465‐acre project site is located at 5850 Condor Drive in the
City of Moorpark Park. The project site is located at the northeast corner of Princeton Ave and Condor Drive
which is planned for light industrial land use. The project site is currently undeveloped and vacant.
The site plan is illustrated on Figure 2. The proposed project consists of developing the project site with a
48,211 square foot new industrial building with 115 stalls of vehicle parking and 10 bicycle parking. The
proposed project will provide two full access driveways on Condor Drive.
PROJECT TRIP GENERATION & DISTRIBUTION
Table 1 shows the project trip generation based upon rates obtained from the Institute of Transportation
Engineers (ITE), Trip Generation Manual, 10th Edition, 2017, ITE, Trip Generation Handbook, 3rd Edition,
2017. The project trips have been categorized into passenger cars and trucks average truck trip percentage
for industrial park from Trip Generation Handbook. Additionally, the project generated truck trips have been
converted to Passenger Car Equivalent (PCE) trips based on PCE for trucks.
As shown in Table 1, the proposed is forecast to generate approximately 239 daily vehicle trips, including 34
vehicle trips during the AM peak hour and 30 vehicle trips during the PM peak hour. In PCE trips, the project
is forecast to generate approximately 287 daily PCE trips, including 41 PCE trips during the AM peak hour
and 36 PCE trips during the PM peak hour.
Figures 3 and 4 illustrate the forecast directional distribution patterns of the project generated passenger car
and truck trips. Passenger car trips are generally more localized with residential or commercial
origin/destination points, whereas truck trips generally have a more regional distribution travelling to/from
other industrial uses or ports/terminals via the freeway. The project trip distribution patterns are based on
review of existing volume data, surrounding land uses, designated truck routes, and the local and regional
roadway facilities in the project vicinity.
Apx-9Draft 7998
Freddie Carrillo, City Assistant Planner | CITY OF MOORPARK PARK
5850 Condor Drive Project Traffic Study Assumptions
September 12, 2019
5850 Condor Drive Project
Traffic Study Assumptions
2 19‐0186
STUDY AREA
As specified in the City of Moorpark application review letter, the study area shall consist of the following
study intersection:
Study Intersections Jurisdiction
1. Princeton Avenue (NS) at Condor Drive (EW) Moorpark
2. Avenida Colonia (NS) at Condor Drive (EW) Moorpark
TRAFFIC COUNTS
New intersection turning movement counts will be collected at the study intersections during the morning
peak period (7:00 AM – 9:00 AM) and evening peak period (4:00 PM – 6:00 PM) on a typical weekday
(Tuesday, Wednesday, or Thursday) while local schools are in session.
INTERSECTION ANALYSIS METHODOLOGY
The study intersections shall by analyzed using the Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) methodology in
accordance with the parameters established by the Ventura County Congestion Management Program (July
2009). The capacity of individual lanes be used in the ICU calculations is 1,850 vehicles per hour with an
adjustment factor to account for start‐up delay, unequal lane distribution and lost time during clearance. The
effective reduced saturation rate is approximately 1,600 vehicles per hour. Intersection analysis shall be
performed using the Vistro software (Version 6.00‐00).
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS
The City of Moorpark Park has established a minimum acceptable Level of Service C for peak hour intersection
operations.
ANALYSIS SCENARIOS
The traffic study shall evaluate the following analysis scenarios for typical weekday AM and PM peak hour
conditions:
Existing
Existing Plus Project
CONCLUSION
We appreciate the opportunity to provide this memorandum of understanding for your review. Should you
have any questions or comments regarding the proposed scope, please contact me.
Sincerely,
Perrie Ilercil,
Senior Engineer
c. 949 257‐3126
Apx-10Draft 8099
Source1 % In % Out Total % In % Out Total Daily
ITE 110 88% 12%
0.70 13% 87%
0.63 4.96
Quantity (TSF)In Out Total In Out Total Daily
Light Industrial 48.211
Cars (80%)24 3 27 3 21 24 191
Trucks (20%)3 61715648
TOTAL VEHICLE TRIPS GENERATED 30 4 34 4 26 30 239
Quantity (TSF)In Out Total In Out Total Daily
Light Industrial 48.211
Cars 24 3 27 3 21 24 191
Trucks (PCE Factor = 2.0)12 2 14 2 10 12 96
TOTAL PCE TRIPS GENERATED 36 5 41 5 31 36 287
Notes:
(1)
(2)TSF = Thousand Square Feet
(3)
Passenger Car Equivalent (PCE) Trips Generated
AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
Land Use/Vehicle Type
ITE = Institute of Transportation Engineers, Trip Generation Manual (10th Edition, 2017); ### = Land Use Code.
Land Use/Vehicle Type
Per ITE Trip Generation Handbook (3rd Edition, 2017), average truck trips for industrial park uses is approximately 13 percent. The percent of
trucks for this analysis is rounded up to 20% to provide a conservative analysis.
Table 1
Project Trip Generation
Trip Generation Rates per TSF2
AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
Light Industrial
Vehicle Trips Generated
AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
Land Use/Vehicle Type
5850 Cordor Drive
Traffic Impact Scoping Agreement
19‐0186
Apx-11Draft 81100
Apx-12Draft 82101
Apx-13Draft 83102
Apx-14Draft 84103
Apx-15Draft 85104
APPENDIX C
GENERAL PLAN CIRCULATION ELEMENT FIGURES
Apx-16Draft 86105
Apx-17Draft87106
Apx-18Draft 88107
Apx-19Draft89108
APPENDIX D
INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT WORKSHEETS
Apx-20Draft 90109
DATE:LOCATION:PROJECT #:SC
Wed, Sep 18, 19 NORTH & SOUTH:LOCATION #:1
EAST & WEST:CONTROL:STOP W
NOTES:AM ▲
PM N
MD ◄W E ►
OTHER S
OTHER ▼
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND
NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL NB SB EB WB TTL
LANES:X10 1 1XXXX0X 0 0000
7:00 AM 014312 8 69000010 4 237 00000
7:15 AM 01628 4 77000000 7 258 00000
7:30 AM 02138 5 82000000 8 316 00000
7:45 AM 022814 9162000020 8 423 00000
8:00 AM 021313 8131000030 5 373 00000
8:15 AM 01881710119000010 4 339 00000
8:30 AM 018510 5118000030 3 324 00000
8:45 AM 019612 7 74000000 2 291 00000
VOLUMES 01,52894568320000100412,56100000
APPROACH % 0% 94% 6% 6% 94% 0% 0% 0% 0% 20% 0% 80%
APP/DEPART 1,622 /1,569 888 /842 0 /150 51 /00
BEGIN PEAK HR
VOLUMES 08145432530000090201,459
APPROACH % 0% 94% 6% 6% 94% 0% 0% 0% 0% 31% 0% 69%
PEAK HR FACTOR 0.897 0.822 0.000 0.725 0.862
APP/DEPART 868 /834 562 /539 0 /86 29 /00
4:00 PM 01663 91680000100 5 361 00000
4:15 PM 01619 20168000090 6 373 00000
4:30 PM 01775 1019000009013404 00000
4:45 PM 01874 2210000050 3 411 00000
5:00 PM 01932 32510000140 5 468 00000
5:15 PM 01967 622800009010456 00000
5:30 PM 01766 21930000110 5 393 00000
5:45 PM 01424 7186000090 5 353 00000
VOLUMES 01,39840591,5940000760523,21900000
APPROACH % 0% 97% 3% 4% 96% 0% 0% 0% 0% 59% 0% 41%
APP/DEPART 1,438 /1,450 1,653 /1,670 0 /99 128 /00
BEGIN PEAK HR
VOLUMES 075318218790000370311,739
APPROACH % 0% 98% 2% 2% 98% 0% 0% 0% 0% 54% 0% 46%
PEAK HR FACTOR 0.950 0.886 0.000 0.773 0.929
APP/DEPART 771 /784 900 /916 0 /39 68 /00
Princeton
NORTH SIDE
Condor WEST SIDE EAST SIDE Condor
SOUTH SIDE
Princeton
INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNTS
PREPARED BY: AimTD LLC. tel: 714 253 7888 cs@aimtd.com
Moorpark
Princeton
Condor
U-TURNS
Princeton Princeton Condor Condor
AM7:45 AM
PM4:30 PM
Add U-Turns to Left Turns
Apx-21Draft 91110
DATE:LOCATION:PROJECT #:SC
Wed, Sep 18, 19 NORTH & SOUTH:LOCATION #:2
EAST & WEST:CONTROL:STOP N
NOTES:AM ▲
PM N
MD ◄W E ►
OTHER S
OTHER ▼
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND
NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL NB SB EB WB TTL
LANES:0X0 X XXX1001 X 0000
7:00 AM 300 0 00016201 0 22 00000
7:15 AM 900 0 00010100 0 20 10001
7:30 AM 800 0 00013401 0 26 00000
7:45 AM 700 0 00023200 0 32 00000
8:00 AM 800 0 00020300 0 31 00000
8:15 AM 800 0 00018601 0 33 00000
8:30 AM 100 0 00017100 0 19 00000
8:45 AM 100 0 0009202 0 14 00101
VOLUMES 45 0 0 0 0 0 0 126 21 0 5 0 199 1 0 1 0 2
APPROACH % 98% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 85% 14% 0% 100% 0%
APP/DEPART 46 /00 /22 148 /126 5 /51 0
BEGIN PEAK HR
VOLUMES 3100 0 000741502 0 122
APPROACH % 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 83% 17% 0% 100% 0%
PEAK HR FACTOR 0.969 0.000 0.890 0.500 0.924
APP/DEPART 31 /00 /15 89 /74 2 /33 0
4:00 PM 200 0 000940130 28 00000
4:15 PM 702 0 0002630140 52 00000
4:30 PM 401 0 000460130 28 00011
4:45 PM 101 0 000341110 21 00011
5:00 PM 101 0 000170140 24 00101
5:15 PM 200 0 000290160 29 00000
5:30 PM 800 0 0000908 0 25 00000
5:45 PM 202 0 0003709 0 23 00000
VOLUMES 27 0 7 0 0 0 0 48 49 1 98 0 233 0 0 1 2 3
APPROACH % 79% 0% 21% 0% 0% 0% 0% 49% 50% 1% 97% 0%
APP/DEPART 34 /00 /50 98 /57 101 /126 0
BEGIN PEAK HR
VOLUMES 14 0 4 0 0 0 0 42 17 1 51 0 131
APPROACH % 78% 0% 22% 0% 0% 0% 0% 71% 29% 2% 94% 0%
PEAK HR FACTOR 0.500 0.000 0.509 0.964 0.630
APP/DEPART 18 /00 /18 59 /48 54 /65 0
Virginia Colony
NORTH SIDE
Condor WEST SIDE EAST SIDE Condor
SOUTH SIDE
Virginia Colony
INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNTS
PREPARED BY: AimTD LLC. tel: 714 253 7888 cs@aimtd.com
Moorpark
Virginia Colony
Condor
U-TURNS
Virginia Colony Virginia Colony Condor Condor
AM7:30 AM
PM4:00 PM
Add U-Turns to Left Turns
Apx-22Draft 92111
APPENDIX E
INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE WORKSHEETS
Apx-23Draft 93112
EXISTING
Apx-24Draft 94113
Intersection Analysis Summary
10/1/2019Report File: G:\...\AME.pdf
Scenario 1 ExistingVistro File: G:\...\AM.vistro
5850 Condor Drive Moorpark, CA
V/C, Delay, LOS: For two-way stop, these values are taken from the movement with the worst (highest) delay value. For
all other control types, they are taken for the whole intersection.
A9.10.034NB LeftHCM 6th
EditionTwo-way stopVirginia Colony Pl (NS) at
Condor Dr (EW)2
D31.10.061WB LeftHCM 6th
EditionTwo-way stopPrinceton Ave (NS) at Condor
Dr (EW)1
LOSDelay (s/veh)V/CWorst MvmtMethodControl TypeIntersection NameID
10/1/2019
AM Peak HourScenario 1: 1 Existing
5850 Condor Drive Moorpark, CA
Version 6.00-00
Generated with
Apx-25Draft 95114
0.061Volume to Capacity (v/c):
DLevel Of Service:
31.1Delay (sec / veh):
15 minutesAnalysis Period:
HCM 6th EditionAnalysis Method:
Two-way stopControl Type:
Intersection 1: Princeton Ave (NS) at Condor Dr (EW)
Intersection Level Of Service Report
NoNoNoCrosswalk
0.000.000.00Grade [%]
25.0030.0030.00Speed [mph]
100.00100.00100.00120.00100.00100.00Pocket Length [ft]
000100No. of Lanes in Pocket
12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft]
RightLeftThruLeftRightThruTurning Movement
Lane Configuration
WestboundSouthboundNorthboundApproach
Condor DrPrinceton AvePrinceton AveName
Intersection Setup
000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h]
2095303254814Total Analysis Volume [veh/h]
52133814204Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h]
1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor
1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Peak Hour Factor
2095303254814Total Hourly Volume [veh/h]
000000Other Volume [veh/h]
000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h]
000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h]
000000Diverted Trips [veh/h]
000000Site-Generated Trips [veh/h]
000000In-Process Volume [veh/h]
1.001.001.001.001.001.00Growth Rate
2.002.002.002.002.002.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%]
1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor
2095303254814Base Volume Input [veh/h]
Condor DrPrinceton AvePrinceton AveName
Volumes
10/1/2019
AM Peak HourScenario 1: 1 Existing
5850 Condor Drive Moorpark, CA
Version 6.00-00
Generated with
Apx-26Draft 96115
DIntersection LOS
0.61d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh]
CAAApproach LOS
20.050.560.00d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh]
4.184.850.003.220.000.0095th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln]
0.170.190.000.130.000.0095th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln]
CDAAAAMovement LOS
15.0631.150.009.840.000.00d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh]
0.050.060.010.040.000.01V/C, Movement V/C Ratio
Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
000Number of Storage Spaces in Median
NoTwo-Stage Gap Acceptance
000Storage Area [veh]
Flared Lane
StopFreeFreePriority Scheme
Intersection Settings
10/1/2019
AM Peak HourScenario 1: 1 Existing
5850 Condor Drive Moorpark, CA
Version 6.00-00
Generated with
Apx-27Draft 97116
0.034Volume to Capacity (v/c):
ALevel Of Service:
9.1Delay (sec / veh):
15 minutesAnalysis Period:
HCM 6th EditionAnalysis Method:
Two-way stopControl Type:
Intersection 2: Virginia Colony Pl (NS) at Condor Dr (EW)
Intersection Level Of Service Report
NoNoNoCrosswalk
0.000.000.00Grade [%]
25.0025.0025.00Speed [mph]
100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00Pocket Length [ft]
000000No. of Lanes in Pocket
12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft]
ThruLeftRightThruRightLeftTurning Movement
Lane Configuration
WestboundEastboundNorthboundApproach
Condor DrCondor DrVirginia Colony PlName
Intersection Setup
000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h]
201574031Total Analysis Volume [veh/h]
1041908Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h]
1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor
1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Peak Hour Factor
201574031Total Hourly Volume [veh/h]
000000Other Volume [veh/h]
000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h]
000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h]
000000Diverted Trips [veh/h]
000000Site-Generated Trips [veh/h]
000000In-Process Volume [veh/h]
1.001.001.001.001.001.00Growth Rate
2.002.002.002.002.002.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%]
1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor
201574031Base Volume Input [veh/h]
Condor DrCondor DrVirginia Colony PlName
Volumes
10/1/2019
AM Peak HourScenario 1: 1 Existing
5850 Condor Drive Moorpark, CA
Version 6.00-00
Generated with
Apx-28Draft 98117
AIntersection LOS
2.30d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh]
AAAApproach LOS
0.000.009.06d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh]
0.000.000.000.002.622.6295th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln]
0.000.000.000.000.100.1095th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln]
AAAAAAMovement LOS
0.007.390.000.008.829.06d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh]
0.000.000.000.000.000.03V/C, Movement V/C Ratio
Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
000Number of Storage Spaces in Median
NoTwo-Stage Gap Acceptance
000Storage Area [veh]
NoFlared Lane
FreeFreeStopPriority Scheme
Intersection Settings
10/1/2019
AM Peak HourScenario 1: 1 Existing
5850 Condor Drive Moorpark, CA
Version 6.00-00
Generated with
Apx-29Draft 99118
Intersection Analysis Summary
10/1/2019Report File: G:\...\PME.pdf
Scenario 1 ExistingVistro File: G:\...\PM.vistro
5850 Condor Drive Moorpark, CA
V/C, Delay, LOS: For two-way stop, these values are taken from the movement with the worst (highest) delay value. For
all other control types, they are taken for the whole intersection.
A8.80.015NB LeftHCM 6th
EditionTwo-way stopVirginia Colony Pl (NS) at
Condor Dr (EW)2
F58.80.361WB LeftHCM 6th
EditionTwo-way stopPrinceton Ave (NS) at Condor
Dr (EW)1
LOSDelay (s/veh)V/CWorst MvmtMethodControl TypeIntersection NameID
10/1/2019
PM Peak HourScenario 1: 1 Existing
5850 Condor Drive Moorpark, CA
Version 6.00-00
Generated with
Apx-30Draft 100119
0.361Volume to Capacity (v/c):
FLevel Of Service:
58.8Delay (sec / veh):
15 minutesAnalysis Period:
HCM 6th EditionAnalysis Method:
Two-way stopControl Type:
Intersection 1: Princeton Ave (NS) at Condor Dr (EW)
Intersection Level Of Service Report
NoNoNoCrosswalk
0.000.000.00Grade [%]
25.0030.0030.00Speed [mph]
100.00100.00100.00120.00100.00100.00Pocket Length [ft]
000100No. of Lanes in Pocket
12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft]
RightLeftThruLeftRightThruTurning Movement
Lane Configuration
WestboundSouthboundNorthboundApproach
Condor DrPrinceton AvePrinceton AveName
Intersection Setup
000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h]
31378792118753Total Analysis Volume [veh/h]
8922055188Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h]
1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor
1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Peak Hour Factor
31378792118753Total Hourly Volume [veh/h]
000000Other Volume [veh/h]
000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h]
000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h]
000000Diverted Trips [veh/h]
000000Site-Generated Trips [veh/h]
000000In-Process Volume [veh/h]
1.001.001.001.001.001.00Growth Rate
2.002.002.002.002.002.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%]
1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor
31378792118753Base Volume Input [veh/h]
Condor DrPrinceton AvePrinceton AveName
Volumes
10/1/2019
PM Peak HourScenario 1: 1 Existing
5850 Condor Drive Moorpark, CA
Version 6.00-00
Generated with
Apx-31Draft 101120
FIntersection LOS
1.62d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh]
EAAApproach LOS
38.620.220.00d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh]
6.1136.060.001.910.000.0095th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln]
0.241.440.000.080.000.0095th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln]
BFAAAAMovement LOS
14.5158.820.009.380.000.00d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh]
0.080.360.010.020.000.01V/C, Movement V/C Ratio
Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
000Number of Storage Spaces in Median
NoTwo-Stage Gap Acceptance
000Storage Area [veh]
Flared Lane
StopFreeFreePriority Scheme
Intersection Settings
10/1/2019
PM Peak HourScenario 1: 1 Existing
5850 Condor Drive Moorpark, CA
Version 6.00-00
Generated with
Apx-32Draft 102121
0.015Volume to Capacity (v/c):
ALevel Of Service:
8.8Delay (sec / veh):
15 minutesAnalysis Period:
HCM 6th EditionAnalysis Method:
Two-way stopControl Type:
Intersection 2: Virginia Colony Pl (NS) at Condor Dr (EW)
Intersection Level Of Service Report
NoNoNoCrosswalk
0.000.000.00Grade [%]
25.0025.0025.00Speed [mph]
100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00Pocket Length [ft]
0000000No. of Lanes in Pocket
12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft]
ThruLeftU-turnRightThruRightLeftTurning Movement
Lane Configuration
WestboundEastboundNorthboundApproach
Condor DrCondor DrVirginia Colony PlName
Intersection Setup
000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h]
51121742414Total Analysis Volume [veh/h]
130141114Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h]
1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor
1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Peak Hour Factor
51121742414Total Hourly Volume [veh/h]
0000000Other Volume [veh/h]
0000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h]
0000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h]
0000000Diverted Trips [veh/h]
0000000Site-Generated Trips [veh/h]
0000000In-Process Volume [veh/h]
1.001.001.001.001.001.001.00Growth Rate
2.002.002.002.002.002.002.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%]
1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor
51121742414Base Volume Input [veh/h]
Condor DrCondor DrVirginia Colony PlName
Volumes
10/1/2019
PM Peak HourScenario 1: 1 Existing
5850 Condor Drive Moorpark, CA
Version 6.00-00
Generated with
Apx-33Draft 103122
AIntersection LOS
2.28d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh]
AAAApproach LOS
8.060.008.79d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh]
0.000.060.060.000.001.421.4295th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln]
0.000.000.000.000.000.060.0695th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln]
AAAAAAMovement LOS
0.007.348.430.000.008.618.85d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh]
0.000.000.000.000.000.000.01V/C, Movement V/C Ratio
Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
000Number of Storage Spaces in Median
NoTwo-Stage Gap Acceptance
000Storage Area [veh]
NoFlared Lane
FreeFreeStopPriority Scheme
Intersection Settings
10/1/2019
PM Peak HourScenario 1: 1 Existing
5850 Condor Drive Moorpark, CA
Version 6.00-00
Generated with
Apx-34Draft 104123
EXISTING PLUS PROJECT
Apx-35Draft 105124
Intersection Analysis Summary
10/1/2019Report File: G:\...\AMEp.pdf
Scenario 2 Existing Plus ProjectVistro File: G:\...\AM.vistro
5850 Condor Drive Moorpark, CA
V/C, Delay, LOS: For two-way stop, these values are taken from the movement with the worst (highest) delay value. For
all other control types, they are taken for the whole intersection.
A9.20.000SB LeftHCM 6th
EditionTwo-way stopEast Project Dwy (NS) at
Condor Dr (EW)4
A9.20.000SB LeftHCM 6th
EditionTwo-way stopWest Project Dwy (NS) at
Condor Dr (EW)3
A9.30.036NB LeftHCM 6th
EditionTwo-way stopVirginia Colony Pl (NS) at
Condor Dr (EW)2
D34.60.076WB LeftHCM 6th
EditionTwo-way stopPrinceton Ave (NS) at Condor
Dr (EW)1
LOSDelay (s/veh)V/CWorst MvmtMethodControl TypeIntersection NameID
10/1/2019
AM Peak HourScenario 2: 2 Existing Plus Project
5850 Condor Drive Moorpark, CA
Version 6.00-00
Generated with
Apx-36Draft 106125
0.076Volume to Capacity (v/c):
DLevel Of Service:
34.6Delay (sec / veh):
15 minutesAnalysis Period:
HCM 6th EditionAnalysis Method:
Two-way stopControl Type:
Intersection 1: Princeton Ave (NS) at Condor Dr (EW)
Intersection Level Of Service Report
NoNoNoCrosswalk
0.000.000.00Grade [%]
25.0030.0030.00Speed [mph]
100.00100.00100.00120.00100.00100.00Pocket Length [ft]
000100No. of Lanes in Pocket
12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft]
RightLeftThruLeftRightThruTurning Movement
Lane Configuration
WestboundSouthboundNorthboundApproach
Condor DrPrinceton AvePrinceton AveName
Intersection Setup
000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h]
24105305864814Total Analysis Volume [veh/h]
631331516204Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h]
1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor
1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Peak Hour Factor
24105305864814Total Hourly Volume [veh/h]
000000Other Volume [veh/h]
000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h]
000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h]
000000Diverted Trips [veh/h]
41026100Site-Generated Trips [veh/h]
000000In-Process Volume [veh/h]
1.001.001.001.001.001.00Growth Rate
2.002.002.002.002.002.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%]
1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor
2095303254814Base Volume Input [veh/h]
Condor DrPrinceton AvePrinceton AveName
Volumes
10/1/2019
AM Peak HourScenario 2: 2 Existing Plus Project
5850 Condor Drive Moorpark, CA
Version 6.00-00
Generated with
Apx-37Draft 107126
DIntersection LOS
0.86d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh]
CAAApproach LOS
20.890.990.00d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh]
5.066.080.006.100.000.0095th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln]
0.200.240.000.240.000.0095th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln]
CDABAAMovement LOS
15.1734.630.0010.060.000.00d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh]
0.060.080.010.080.000.01V/C, Movement V/C Ratio
Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
000Number of Storage Spaces in Median
NoTwo-Stage Gap Acceptance
000Storage Area [veh]
Flared Lane
StopFreeFreePriority Scheme
Intersection Settings
10/1/2019
AM Peak HourScenario 2: 2 Existing Plus Project
5850 Condor Drive Moorpark, CA
Version 6.00-00
Generated with
Apx-38Draft 108127
0.036Volume to Capacity (v/c):
ALevel Of Service:
9.3Delay (sec / veh):
15 minutesAnalysis Period:
HCM 6th EditionAnalysis Method:
Two-way stopControl Type:
Intersection 2: Virginia Colony Pl (NS) at Condor Dr (EW)
Intersection Level Of Service Report
NoNoNoCrosswalk
0.000.000.00Grade [%]
25.0025.0025.00Speed [mph]
100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00Pocket Length [ft]
000000No. of Lanes in Pocket
12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft]
ThruLeftRightThruRightLeftTurning Movement
Lane Configuration
WestboundEastboundNorthboundApproach
Condor DrCondor DrVirginia Colony PlName
Intersection Setup
000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h]
7015110031Total Analysis Volume [veh/h]
2042808Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h]
1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor
1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Peak Hour Factor
7015110031Total Hourly Volume [veh/h]
000000Other Volume [veh/h]
000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h]
000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h]
000000Diverted Trips [veh/h]
5003600Site-Generated Trips [veh/h]
000000In-Process Volume [veh/h]
1.001.001.001.001.001.00Growth Rate
2.002.002.002.002.002.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%]
1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor
201574031Base Volume Input [veh/h]
Condor DrCondor DrVirginia Colony PlName
Volumes
10/1/2019
AM Peak HourScenario 2: 2 Existing Plus Project
5850 Condor Drive Moorpark, CA
Version 6.00-00
Generated with
Apx-39Draft 109128
AIntersection LOS
1.77d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh]
AAAApproach LOS
0.000.009.29d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh]
0.000.000.000.002.772.7795th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln]
0.000.000.000.000.110.1195th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln]
AAAAAAMovement LOS
0.007.460.000.009.019.29d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh]
0.000.000.000.000.000.04V/C, Movement V/C Ratio
Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
000Number of Storage Spaces in Median
NoTwo-Stage Gap Acceptance
000Storage Area [veh]
NoFlared Lane
FreeFreeStopPriority Scheme
Intersection Settings
10/1/2019
AM Peak HourScenario 2: 2 Existing Plus Project
5850 Condor Drive Moorpark, CA
Version 6.00-00
Generated with
Apx-40Draft 110129
0.000Volume to Capacity (v/c):
ALevel Of Service:
9.2Delay (sec / veh):
15 minutesAnalysis Period:
HCM 6th EditionAnalysis Method:
Two-way stopControl Type:
Intersection 3: West Project Dwy (NS) at Condor Dr (EW)
Intersection Level Of Service Report
NoNoNoCrosswalk
0.000.000.00Grade [%]
25.0025.0025.00Speed [mph]
100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00Pocket Length [ft]
000000No. of Lanes in Pocket
12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft]
RightThruThruLeftRightLeftTurning Movement
Lane Configuration
WestboundEastboundSouthboundApproach
Condor DrCondor DrWest Project DwyName
Intersection Setup
000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h]
05981220Total Analysis Volume [veh/h]
0125310Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h]
1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor
1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Peak Hour Factor
05981220Total Hourly Volume [veh/h]
000000Other Volume [veh/h]
000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h]
000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h]
000000Diverted Trips [veh/h]
03241220Site-Generated Trips [veh/h]
000000In-Process Volume [veh/h]
1.001.001.001.001.001.00Growth Rate
2.002.002.002.002.002.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%]
1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor
0274000Base Volume Input [veh/h]
Condor DrCondor DrWest Project DwyName
Volumes
10/1/2019
AM Peak HourScenario 2: 2 Existing Plus Project
5850 Condor Drive Moorpark, CA
Version 6.00-00
Generated with
Apx-41Draft 111130
AIntersection LOS
0.89d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh]
AAAApproach LOS
0.000.798.35d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh]
0.000.000.560.560.140.1495th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln]
0.000.000.020.020.010.0195th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln]
AAAAAAMovement LOS
0.000.000.007.248.359.19d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh]
0.000.000.000.010.000.00V/C, Movement V/C Ratio
Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
000Number of Storage Spaces in Median
NoTwo-Stage Gap Acceptance
000Storage Area [veh]
NoFlared Lane
FreeFreeStopPriority Scheme
Intersection Settings
10/1/2019
AM Peak HourScenario 2: 2 Existing Plus Project
5850 Condor Drive Moorpark, CA
Version 6.00-00
Generated with
Apx-42Draft 112131
0.000Volume to Capacity (v/c):
ALevel Of Service:
9.2Delay (sec / veh):
15 minutesAnalysis Period:
HCM 6th EditionAnalysis Method:
Two-way stopControl Type:
Intersection 4: East Project Dwy (NS) at Condor Dr (EW)
Intersection Level Of Service Report
NoNoNoCrosswalk
0.000.000.00Grade [%]
25.0025.0025.00Speed [mph]
100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00Pocket Length [ft]
000000No. of Lanes in Pocket
12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft]
RightThruThruLeftRightLeftTurning Movement
Lane Configuration
WestboundEastboundSouthboundApproach
Condor DrCondor DrEast Project DwyName
Intersection Setup
000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h]
02742430Total Analysis Volume [veh/h]
0119610Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h]
1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor
1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Peak Hour Factor
02742430Total Hourly Volume [veh/h]
000000Other Volume [veh/h]
000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h]
000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h]
000000Diverted Trips [veh/h]
0002430Site-Generated Trips [veh/h]
000000In-Process Volume [veh/h]
1.001.001.001.001.001.00Growth Rate
2.002.002.002.002.002.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%]
1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor
0274000Base Volume Input [veh/h]
Condor DrCondor DrEast Project DwyName
Volumes
10/1/2019
AM Peak HourScenario 2: 2 Existing Plus Project
5850 Condor Drive Moorpark, CA
Version 6.00-00
Generated with
Apx-43Draft 113132
AIntersection LOS
1.93d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh]
AAAApproach LOS
0.001.788.34d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh]
0.000.001.131.130.210.2195th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln]
0.000.000.050.050.010.0195th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln]
AAAAAAMovement LOS
0.000.000.007.268.349.21d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh]
0.000.000.000.010.000.00V/C, Movement V/C Ratio
Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
000Number of Storage Spaces in Median
NoTwo-Stage Gap Acceptance
000Storage Area [veh]
NoFlared Lane
FreeFreeStopPriority Scheme
Intersection Settings
10/1/2019
AM Peak HourScenario 2: 2 Existing Plus Project
5850 Condor Drive Moorpark, CA
Version 6.00-00
Generated with
Apx-44Draft 114133
Intersection Analysis Summary
10/1/2019Report File: G:\...\PMEp.pdf
Scenario 2 Existing Plus ProjectVistro File: G:\...\PM.vistro
5850 Condor Drive Moorpark, CA
V/C, Delay, LOS: For two-way stop, these values are taken from the movement with the worst (highest) delay value. For
all other control types, they are taken for the whole intersection.
A9.10.000SB LeftHCM 6th
EditionTwo-way stopEast Project Dwy (NS) at
Condor Dr (EW)4
A9.20.000SB LeftHCM 6th
EditionTwo-way stopWest Project Dwy (NS) at
Condor Dr (EW)3
A8.90.015NB LeftHCM 6th
EditionTwo-way stopVirginia Colony Pl (NS) at
Condor Dr (EW)2
F66.80.447WB LeftHCM 6th
EditionTwo-way stopPrinceton Ave (NS) at Condor
Dr (EW)1
LOSDelay (s/veh)V/CWorst MvmtMethodControl TypeIntersection NameID
10/1/2019
PM Peak HourScenario 2: 2 Existing Plus Project
5850 Condor Drive Moorpark, CA
Version 6.00-00
Generated with
Apx-45Draft 115134
0.447Volume to Capacity (v/c):
FLevel Of Service:
66.8Delay (sec / veh):
15 minutesAnalysis Period:
HCM 6th EditionAnalysis Method:
Two-way stopControl Type:
Intersection 1: Princeton Ave (NS) at Condor Dr (EW)
Intersection Level Of Service Report
NoNoNoCrosswalk
0.000.000.00Grade [%]
25.0030.0030.00Speed [mph]
100.00100.00100.00120.00100.00100.00Pocket Length [ft]
000100No. of Lanes in Pocket
12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft]
RightLeftThruLeftRightThruTurning Movement
Lane Configuration
WestboundSouthboundNorthboundApproach
Condor DrPrinceton AvePrinceton AveName
Intersection Setup
000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h]
54458792519753Total Analysis Volume [veh/h]
141122065188Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h]
1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor
1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Peak Hour Factor
54458792519753Total Hourly Volume [veh/h]
000000Other Volume [veh/h]
000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h]
000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h]
000000Diverted Trips [veh/h]
2380410Site-Generated Trips [veh/h]
000000In-Process Volume [veh/h]
1.001.001.001.001.001.00Growth Rate
2.002.002.002.002.002.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%]
1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor
31378792118753Base Volume Input [veh/h]
Condor DrPrinceton AvePrinceton AveName
Volumes
10/1/2019
PM Peak HourScenario 2: 2 Existing Plus Project
5850 Condor Drive Moorpark, CA
Version 6.00-00
Generated with
Apx-46Draft 116135
FIntersection LOS
2.29d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh]
EAAApproach LOS
38.620.260.00d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh]
11.2747.550.002.290.000.0095th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln]
0.451.900.000.090.000.0095th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln]
CFAAAAMovement LOS
15.1266.820.009.400.000.00d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh]
0.130.450.010.030.000.01V/C, Movement V/C Ratio
Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
000Number of Storage Spaces in Median
NoTwo-Stage Gap Acceptance
000Storage Area [veh]
Flared Lane
StopFreeFreePriority Scheme
Intersection Settings
10/1/2019
PM Peak HourScenario 2: 2 Existing Plus Project
5850 Condor Drive Moorpark, CA
Version 6.00-00
Generated with
Apx-47Draft 117136
0.015Volume to Capacity (v/c):
ALevel Of Service:
8.9Delay (sec / veh):
15 minutesAnalysis Period:
HCM 6th EditionAnalysis Method:
Two-way stopControl Type:
Intersection 2: Virginia Colony Pl (NS) at Condor Dr (EW)
Intersection Level Of Service Report
NoNoNoCrosswalk
0.000.000.00Grade [%]
25.0025.0025.00Speed [mph]
100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00Pocket Length [ft]
0000000No. of Lanes in Pocket
12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft]
ThruLeftU-turnRightThruRightLeftTurning Movement
Lane Configuration
WestboundEastboundNorthboundApproach
Condor DrCondor DrVirginia Colony PlName
Intersection Setup
000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h]
82121747414Total Analysis Volume [veh/h]
210141214Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h]
1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor
1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Peak Hour Factor
82121747414Total Hourly Volume [veh/h]
0000000Other Volume [veh/h]
0000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h]
0000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h]
0000000Diverted Trips [veh/h]
31000500Site-Generated Trips [veh/h]
0000000In-Process Volume [veh/h]
1.001.001.001.001.001.001.00Growth Rate
2.002.002.002.002.002.002.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%]
1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor
51121742414Base Volume Input [veh/h]
Condor DrCondor DrVirginia Colony PlName
Volumes
10/1/2019
PM Peak HourScenario 2: 2 Existing Plus Project
5850 Condor Drive Moorpark, CA
Version 6.00-00
Generated with
Apx-48Draft 118137
AIntersection LOS
2.15d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh]
AAAApproach LOS
8.080.008.82d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh]
0.000.060.060.000.001.431.4395th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln]
0.000.000.000.000.000.060.0695th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln]
AAAAAAMovement LOS
0.007.358.450.000.008.638.87d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh]
0.000.000.000.000.000.000.01V/C, Movement V/C Ratio
Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
000Number of Storage Spaces in Median
NoTwo-Stage Gap Acceptance
000Storage Area [veh]
NoFlared Lane
FreeFreeStopPriority Scheme
Intersection Settings
10/1/2019
PM Peak HourScenario 2: 2 Existing Plus Project
5850 Condor Drive Moorpark, CA
Version 6.00-00
Generated with
Apx-49Draft 119138
0.000Volume to Capacity (v/c):
ALevel Of Service:
9.2Delay (sec / veh):
15 minutesAnalysis Period:
HCM 6th EditionAnalysis Method:
Two-way stopControl Type:
Intersection 3: West Project Dwy (NS) at Condor Dr (EW)
Intersection Level Of Service Report
NoNoNoCrosswalk
0.000.000.00Grade [%]
25.0025.0025.00Speed [mph]
100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00Pocket Length [ft]
000000No. of Lanes in Pocket
12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft]
RightThruThruLeftRightLeftTurning Movement
Lane Configuration
WestboundEastboundSouthboundApproach
Condor DrCondor DrWest Project DwyName
Intersection Setup
000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h]
076492110Total Analysis Volume [veh/h]
01912130Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h]
1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor
1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Peak Hour Factor
076492110Total Hourly Volume [veh/h]
000000Other Volume [veh/h]
000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h]
000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h]
000000Diverted Trips [veh/h]
02032110Site-Generated Trips [veh/h]
000000In-Process Volume [veh/h]
1.001.001.001.001.001.00Growth Rate
2.002.002.002.002.002.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%]
1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor
05646000Base Volume Input [veh/h]
Condor DrCondor DrWest Project DwyName
Volumes
10/1/2019
PM Peak HourScenario 2: 2 Existing Plus Project
5850 Condor Drive Moorpark, CA
Version 6.00-00
Generated with
Apx-50Draft 120139
AIntersection LOS
0.80d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh]
AAAApproach LOS
0.000.298.70d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh]
0.000.000.100.100.850.8595th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln]
0.000.000.000.000.030.0395th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln]
AAAAAAMovement LOS
0.000.000.007.378.709.21d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh]
0.000.000.000.000.010.00V/C, Movement V/C Ratio
Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
000Number of Storage Spaces in Median
NoTwo-Stage Gap Acceptance
000Storage Area [veh]
NoFlared Lane
FreeFreeStopPriority Scheme
Intersection Settings
10/1/2019
PM Peak HourScenario 2: 2 Existing Plus Project
5850 Condor Drive Moorpark, CA
Version 6.00-00
Generated with
Apx-51Draft 121140
0.000Volume to Capacity (v/c):
ALevel Of Service:
9.1Delay (sec / veh):
15 minutesAnalysis Period:
HCM 6th EditionAnalysis Method:
Two-way stopControl Type:
Intersection 4: East Project Dwy (NS) at Condor Dr (EW)
Intersection Level Of Service Report
NoNoNoCrosswalk
0.000.000.00Grade [%]
25.0025.0025.00Speed [mph]
100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00Pocket Length [ft]
000000No. of Lanes in Pocket
12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft]
RightThruThruLeftRightLeftTurning Movement
Lane Configuration
WestboundEastboundSouthboundApproach
Condor DrCondor DrEast Project DwyName
Intersection Setup
000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h]
056463200Total Analysis Volume [veh/h]
01412150Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h]
1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor
1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Peak Hour Factor
056463200Total Hourly Volume [veh/h]
000000Other Volume [veh/h]
000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h]
000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h]
000000Diverted Trips [veh/h]
0003200Site-Generated Trips [veh/h]
000000In-Process Volume [veh/h]
1.001.001.001.001.001.00Growth Rate
2.002.002.002.002.002.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%]
1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor
05646000Base Volume Input [veh/h]
Condor DrCondor DrEast Project DwyName
Volumes
10/1/2019
PM Peak HourScenario 2: 2 Existing Plus Project
5850 Condor Drive Moorpark, CA
Version 6.00-00
Generated with
Apx-52Draft 122141
AIntersection LOS
1.56d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh]
AAAApproach LOS
0.000.458.63d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh]
0.000.000.150.151.511.5195th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln]
0.000.000.010.010.060.0695th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln]
AAAAAAMovement LOS
0.000.000.007.338.639.13d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh]
0.000.000.000.000.020.00V/C, Movement V/C Ratio
Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
000Number of Storage Spaces in Median
NoTwo-Stage Gap Acceptance
000Storage Area [veh]
NoFlared Lane
FreeFreeStopPriority Scheme
Intersection Settings
10/1/2019
PM Peak HourScenario 2: 2 Existing Plus Project
5850 Condor Drive Moorpark, CA
Version 6.00-00
Generated with
Apx-53Draft 123142
APPENDIX F
TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANT WORKSHEETS
Apx-54Draft 124143
California Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devlces
WARRANT 3, PEAK HOUR
(Urban Areas)
Traffic Conditions =Existing Without Project ‐ AM
Major Street Name =Princeton Avenue Total of Both Approaches (VPH) =1430
Number of Approach Lanes on Major Street =2
Minor Street Name =Condor Drive High Volume Approach (VPH) =29
Number of Approach Lanes On Minor Street =1
SIGNAL WARRANT NOT SATISFIED
* Note: 150 vph applies as the lower threshold volume for a minor-street
approach with two or more lanes and 100 vph applies as the lower
threshold volume for a minor-street approach with one lane. Minor Street - Higher-Volume Approach - VPH143029
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800
Major Street - Total of Both Approaches - Vehicles Per Hour (VPH)
1 Lane (Major) & 1 Lane (Minor)
2+ Lanes (Major) & 1 Lane (Minor) OR 1 Lane (Major) & 2+ Lanes (Minor)
2+ Lanes (Major) & 2+ Lanes (Minor)
Major Street Approaches
Minor Street Approaches
*150
*100
18-0085_SIGNAL WARRANT3_URBAN.xlsm Sect. 4C.06
Apx-55Draft 125144
California Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devlces
WARRANT 3, PEAK HOUR
(Urban Areas)
Traffic Conditions =Existing Without Project ‐ PM
Major Street Name =Princeton Avenue Total of Both Approaches (VPH) =1671
Number of Approach Lanes on Major Street =1
Minor Street Name =Condor Drive High Volume Approach (VPH) =68
Number of Approach Lanes On Minor Street =2
SIGNAL WARRANT NOT SATISFIED
* Note: 150 vph applies as the lower threshold volume for a minor-street
approach with two or more lanes and 100 vph applies as the lower
threshold volume for a minor-street approach with one lane. Minor Street - Higher-Volume Approach - VPH167168
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800
Major Street - Total of Both Approaches - Vehicles Per Hour (VPH)
1 Lane (Major) & 1 Lane (Minor)
2+ Lanes (Major) & 1 Lane (Minor) OR 1 Lane (Major) & 2+ Lanes (Minor)
2+ Lanes (Major) & 2+ Lanes (Minor)
Major Street Approaches
Minor Street Approaches
*150
*100
18-0085_SIGNAL WARRANT3_URBAN.xlsm Sect. 4C.06
Apx-56Draft 126145
California Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devlces
WARRANT 3, PEAK HOUR
(Urban Areas)
Traffic Conditions =Existing Plus Project ‐ AM
Major Street Name =Princeton Avenue Total of Both Approaches (VPH) =1466
Number of Approach Lanes on Major Street =1
Minor Street Name =Condor Drive High Volume Approach (VPH) =34
Number of Approach Lanes On Minor Street =2
SIGNAL WARRANT NOT SATISFIED
* Note: 150 vph applies as the lower threshold volume for a minor-street
approach with two or more lanes and 100 vph applies as the lower
threshold volume for a minor-street approach with one lane. Minor Street - Higher-Volume Approach - VPH146634
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800
Major Street - Total of Both Approaches - Vehicles Per Hour (VPH)
1 Lane (Major) & 1 Lane (Minor)
2+ Lanes (Major) & 1 Lane (Minor) OR 1 Lane (Major) & 2+ Lanes (Minor)
2+ Lanes (Major) & 2+ Lanes (Minor)
Major Street Approaches
Minor Street Approaches
*150
*100
18-0085_SIGNAL WARRANT3_URBAN.xlsm Sect. 4C.06
Apx-57Draft 127146
California Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devlces
WARRANT 3, PEAK HOUR
(Urban Areas)
Traffic Conditions =Existing Plus Project ‐ PM
Major Street Name =Princeton Avenue Total of Both Approaches (VPH) =1676
Number of Approach Lanes on Major Street =1
Minor Street Name =Condor Drive High Volume Approach (VPH) =99
Number of Approach Lanes On Minor Street =2
SIGNAL WARRANT NOT SATISFIED
* Note: 150 vph applies as the lower threshold volume for a minor-street
approach with two or more lanes and 100 vph applies as the lower
threshold volume for a minor-street approach with one lane. Minor Street - Higher-Volume Approach - VPH167699
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800
Major Street - Total of Both Approaches - Vehicles Per Hour (VPH)
1 Lane (Major) & 1 Lane (Minor)
2+ Lanes (Major) & 1 Lane (Minor) OR 1 Lane (Major) & 2+ Lanes (Minor)
2+ Lanes (Major) & 2+ Lanes (Minor)
Major Street Approaches
Minor Street Approaches
*150
*100
18-0085_SIGNAL WARRANT3_URBAN.xlsm Sect. 4C.06
Apx-58Draft 128147
GANDDINI GROUP, INC.
550 Parkcenter Drive, Suite 202, Santa Ana, CA 92705
714.795.3100 | www.ganddini.comDraft
129148
ATTACHMENT 6
130149
131150
132151
133152
134153
135154
136155
137156
138157
RESOLUTION NO. 2020-____
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
MOORPARK, APPROVING INDUSTRIAL PLANNED
DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 2019-01 AND CONDITIONAL USE
PERMIT NO. 2020-02 FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF A 48,787
SQUARE-FOOT, SINGLE-STORY INDUSTRIAL BUILDING AND
ASSOCIATED SITE IMPROVEMENTS ON AN UNDEVELOPED
3.46-ACRE SITE AT 5850 CONDOR DRIVE, AND MAKING A
DETERMINATION OF EXEMPTION UNDER CEQA IN
CONNECTION THEREWITH, AND DENYING THE REQUEST TO
FUND COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE UNDERGROUNDING
OF UTILITIES, ON THE APPLICATION OF PAUL MINOO FOR 4M
INVESTMENT CORPORATION
WHEREAS, on November 13, 2019, an application was filed for Industrial
Planned Development (IPD) Permit No. 2019-01 and Conditional Use Permit (CUP)
No. 2020-02 for the development of a 48,787 square-foot, single-story industrial building
and associated site improvement on an undeveloped 3.46-acre site at 5850 Condor
Drive; and submitted a funding request to the City of $469,398.00 for costs associated
with the undergrounding of utilities pursuant to the Southern California Edison Rule 20b
scenario; and
WHEREAS, on June 2, 2020, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution
No. 2020-650, recommending to the City Council conditional approval of Industrial
Planned Development No. 2019-01 and Conditional Use Permit No. 2020-02, with no
consideration of the funding request; and
WHEREAS, at a duly noticed public hearing on July 15, 2020, the City Council
considered the agenda report for Industrial Planned Development No. 2019-01 and
Conditional Use Permit No. 2020-02 and any supplements thereto and written public
comments; opened the public hearing and took and considered public testimony both
for and against the proposal; and reached a decision on this matter; and
WHEREAS, the Community Development Department has determined that IPD
No. 2019-01 and CUP No. 2020-02 is categorically exempt from the provisions of the
California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 15332 (Class 32: In-
Fill Development Projects) of the CEQA Guidelines.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK,
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTATION: The City Council, based
on its own independent analysis and judgment, concurs with the Community
Development Director’s determination that the project is categorically exempt from the
requirements of CEQA pursuant to Section 15332 (Class 32: In-Fill Development
Projects) of the CEQA Guidelines. The proposed building is consistent with the General
Plan and Zoning regulations. In addition, there is no substantial evidence that the
ATTACHMENT 7
139158
Resolution No. 2020-____
Page 2
project will have a significant effect on the environment in that the site will be developed
with associated site improvements. No further environmental documentation is needed.
SECTION 2. PLANNED DEVELOPMENT FINDINGS: Based upon the
information set forth in the staff report(s), accompanying studies, and oral and written
public testimony, the City Council makes the following findings in accordance with City
of Moorpark, Municipal Code Section 17.44.040:
1. The site design, including structure location, size, height, setbacks, massing,
scale, architectural style and colors, and landscaping, is consistent with the goals
and policies of the City’s General Plan and Zoning Ordinance, as described in
the staff report and attachments thereto in that the building design features a
contemporary industrial architecture that includes concrete tilt-up panels with
rectangular tinted clerestory windows and roll-up truck doors. The scale of the
building is compatible with the surrounding business campus directly adjacent to
the project site.
2. The site design would not create negative impacts on or impair the utility of
properties, structures or uses in the surrounding area in that the building height
of 41-feet and 6-inches is generally consistent with the height of the existing
industrial buildings in the vicinity. In addition, the building is below the grade level
of the adjacent lot.
3. The proposed use is compatible with existing and permitted uses in the
surrounding area in that suitable uses, such as, light industrial services, technical
research and business office would be permitted under the Industrial Park (M-1)
Zoning designation.
SECTION 3. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FINDINGS: Based upon the
information set forth in the staff report(s), accompanying studies, and oral and written
public testimony, the City Council makes the following findings in accordance with City
of Moorpark, Municipal Code Section 17.44.040:
1. The proposed use is consistent with the provisions of the General Plan, zoning
ordinance, and other applicable regulations; in that Table 17.24.031 of the City
Code allows a maximum building height of 60-feet within the Industrial Park (M-1)
zone with an approved CUP.
2. The proposed use is compatible with both existing and permitted land uses in the
surrounding area, in that the proposed building height of 41-feet and 6-inches is
common in the existing business campus.
The proposed use is compatible with the scale, visual character, and design of
surrounding properties, in that the proposed building height is appropriate for the
architecture of the building and consistent with the adjacent industrial buildings.
140159
Resolution No. 2020-____
Page 3
3. The proposed use would not be obnoxious or harmful, or impair the utility of
neighboring property or uses, in that the proposed building is below the grade
level from the adjacent lot; therefore, the visual impact of the proposed building is
minor and would not present any impacts on adjoining uses.
4. The proposed use would not be detrimental to the public health, safety,
convenience, or welfare, in that the project is substantially consistent with
existing industrial development in the vicinity, includes sufficient loading and on-
site parking facilities, and will be designed to comply with all applicable codes
and regulations.
SECTION 4. CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL: The City Council approves
Industrial Planned Development No. 2019-01 and Conditional Use Permit No. 2020-02,
subject to the Standard and Special Conditions of Approval included in Exhibit A,
attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference.
SECTION 5. CITY COUNCIL DENIAL: The City Council denies the Applicant’s
funding request of $469,398.00 for costs associated with the undergrounding of utilities
pursuant to the Southern California Edison Rule 20b scenario.
SECTION 6. CERTIFICATE OF ADOPTION: the City Clerk shall certify to the
adoption of this resolution and shall cause a certified resolution to be filed in the book or
original resolutions.
PASSED, AND ADOPTED this 15th day of July, 2020.
Janice S. Parvin, Mayor
ATTEST:
Ky Spangler, City Clerk
Exhibit A – Standard and Special Conditions of Approval Industrial Planned
Development No. 2019-01 and Conditional Use Permit No. 2020-02
141160
Resolution No. 2020-____
Page 4
EXHIBIT A
STANDARD AND SPECIAL CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
FOR INDUSTRIAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 2019-01
AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2020-02
STANDARD CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
The applicant shall comply with Standard Conditions of Approval for Subdivisions and
Planned Developments as adopted by City Council Resolution No. 2009-2799 (Exhibit
A), except as modified by the following Special Conditions of Approval. In the event of
conflict between a Standard and Special Condition of Approval, the Special Condition
shall apply.
SPECIAL CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
1. The applicant's acceptance of this permit and/or commencement of construction
and/or operations under this permit is deemed to be acceptance of all conditions
of this permit.
2. The Conditions of Approval of this permit, City of Moorpark Municipal Code and
adopted city policies at the time of the permit approval supersede all conflicting
notations, specifications, dimensions, typical sections and the like which may be
shown on plans.
3. Industrial Planned Development No. 2019-01 and Conditional Use Permit No.
2020-02 expire one (1) year from the date of its approval unless the use has
been inaugurated by issuance of a building permit for construction. The
Community Development Director may, at his/her discretion, grant up to two (2)
additional one-year extensions for use inauguration of the development permit, if
there have been no changes in the adjacent areas and if the applicant can
document that he/she has diligently worked towards use inauguration during the
initial period of time. The request for extension of this planned development
permit must be made in writing, at least thirty (30) days prior to the expiration
date of the permit and must be accompanied by applicable entitlement
processing deposits.
4. Conditions of this entitlement may not be interpreted as permitting or requiring
any violation of law or any unlawful rules or regulations or orders of an authorized
governmental agency.
5. The applicant shall defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City and its agents,
officers and employees from any claim, action or proceeding against the City or
its agents, officers or employees to attack, set aside, void, or annul any approval
by the City or any of its agencies, departments, commissions, agents, officers, or
142161
Resolution No. 2020-____
Page 5
employees concerning the permit, which claim, action or proceeding is brought
within the time period provided by the California Code of Civil Procedure Section
1094.6 and Government Code Section 65009. The City will promptly notify the
applicant of any such claim, action or proceeding, and if the City should fail to do
so or should fail to cooperate fully in the defense, the applicant shall not
thereafter be responsible to defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City or its
agents, officers and employees pursuant to this condition.
a. The City may, within its unlimited discretion, participate in the defense of
any such claim, action or proceeding, if both of the following occur:
i. The City bears its own attorney fees and costs; and
ii. The City defends the claim, action or proceeding in good faith.
b. The applicant shall not be required to pay or perform any settlement of
such claim, action or proceeding unless the settlement is approved by the
applicant. The applicant's obligations under this condition shall apply
regardless of whether a building permit is ultimately obtained, or final
occupancy is ultimately granted with respect to the permit.
6. If any of the conditions or limitations of this approval are held to be invalid, that
holding shall not invalidate any of the remaining conditions or limitations set forth.
7. The development must be in substantial conformance with the plans presented in
conjunction with the application for Industrial Planned Development No. 2019-01
and Conditional Use Permit No. 2020-02, except any modifications as may be
required to meet specific Code standards or other conditions stipulated herein.
Any future changes to the parking layout shall require review and approval as
determined by the Community Development Director consistent with Chapter
17.44 of the Zoning Ordinance.
8. Industrial Planned Development No. 2019-01 and Conditional Use Permit No.
2020-02 are granted or approved with the City’s designated approving body
retaining and reserving the right and jurisdiction to review and to modify the
permit—including the conditions of approval—based on changed circumstances.
Changed circumstances include, but are not limited to, major modification of the
business; a change in scope, emphasis, size, or nature of the business; the
expansion, alteration, reconfiguration, or change of use; or the fact that the use is
negatively impacting surrounding uses by virtue of impacts not identified at the
time of application for the conditional use permit or impacts that are much greater
than anticipated or disclosed at the time of application for the conditional use
permit. The reservation of right to review any permit granted or approved under
this chapter by the City’s designated approving body is in addition to, and not in
lieu of, the right of the City, its Planning Commission, City Council and
designated approving body to review and revoke or modify any permit granted or
143162
Resolution No. 2020-____
Page 6
approved under this chapter for any violations of the conditions imposed on such
permit.
9. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall submit a lighting and
landscaping plan for review and approval by the Community Development
Director, Parks and Recreation Director, and Police Chief that demonstrates
compliance with the City’s Zoning Ordinance, Landscape Standards and
Guidelines, and Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance, and provides a safe and
secure environment for the building occupants.
10. Prior to the issuance of a Zoning Clearance for occupancy, the applicant shall
submit a Developer Waste Reduction and Recycling Plan to the satisfaction of
the Program Manager.
11. All necessary permits must be obtained from the Building and Safety Division
and all construction shall be in compliance with the Moorpark Building Code and
all other applicable regulations.
12. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall provide a sample of
the glass to be used, along with the manufacturer’s specifications for exterior
reflectance, for review and approval by the Community Development Director.
13. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, a Lot Merger application for Assessor
Parcel Nos.: 513-0-060-175, 513-0-060-185, and 513-0-060-315 must be
completed and recorded.
14. Parking areas must be developed and maintained in compliance with the
Moorpark Municipal Code, and surfaced with asphalt, concrete, or other surface
acceptable to the Community Development Director, City Engineer/Public Works
Director, and must include adequate provisions for drainage, National Pollution
Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) compliance, striping and appropriate
wheel blocks or curbs in parking areas adjacent to landscaped areas. All parking
space striping must be maintained to be clearly visible during the life of the
development.
15. A separate sign permit application is required for all proposed signs, which are
subject to the review and approval of the Community Development Director.
16. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall submit all fees,
including, but not limited to Los Angeles Avenue Area of Contribution Fee, Air
Quality Fee, Tree and Landscape Fee, Fire Protection Facilities Fee, Police
Facilities Fee, and Library Facilities Fee. All entitlement processing fees must be
paid in full prior to the issuance of a building permit.
144163
Resolution No. 2020-____
Page 7
17. Prior to issuance of a building permit, applicant shall either submit an in-lieu art
fee or indicate a location for on-site public art in compliance with Chapter 17.50
of the Zoning Ordinance. If on-site public art is approved, it must be installed and
completed prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy.
Engineering / Public Works
18. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, provide street improvement plans, including
all profiles, for Princeton Avenue and Condor Drive. Street improvement plans
shall include all improvements within the existing and proposed right-of-way (curb
and gutter, sidewalk, parkways, driveways, etc.).
19. Provide site improvement plans, including grading and drainage, site utilities,
storm drainage infrastructure, sewer, domestic water, irrigation water, fire water,
etc.
20. Provide a Hydrology and Hydraulic Report, prepared by a State of California
Licensed Civil Engineer. Peak storm water runoff mitigation shall comply with
Ventura County Design Hydrology Manual and no developed peak condition shall
exceed the 10-year developed condition.
21. Provide a revised Storm Water Quality Report, prepared by a State of California
Licensed Civil Engineer. Report formatting shall follow the County’s Technical
Guidance Manual for Storm Water Quality Measures.
22. All proposed storm water quality BMPs shall comply with the most current MS4
permit.
23. Provide Storm Water Quality Operations and Maintenance Manual and
Covenant.
24. Provide street dedication and/or easement documents for consideration to the
satisfaction of the City Engineer/Public Works Director.
25. Provide water and sewer improvement plans for reference.
26. Applicant shall install “full-capture” trash excluders approved by the California
State Water Resources Control Board for compliance with the State’s Trash
Policy (State Water Resources Control Board Resolution No. 2015-0019) in all
storm drains. Flow capacity calculations showing compliance with the 1-year, 1-
hour minimum flow design criteria and applicable bypass sizing shall be identified
on Plans and submitted to the City Engineer for review and approval prior to
installation. An ongoing Operations and Maintenance Plan shall also be
submitted to the City Engineer for review.
145164
Resolution No. 2020-____
Page 8
27. Project will provide street and frontage improvements along Princeton Avenue.
Such frontage improvements include replacing an existing transit/bus shelter with
a new one, to the satisfaction of the City’s Transit Program Manager.
Additionally, the street improvements along Princeton Avenue shall include a bus
turnout for the new transit/bus shelter, per Ventura County Road Standards.
Ventura County Fire Protection District (VCFPD)
28. Access Road Width, Private Roads/Driveways - Private roads shall comply
with Public Road Standards.
29. Construction Access - Prior to combustible construction, a paved all-weather
access road / driveway suitable for use by a 20 ton Fire District vehicle shall be
installed at locations approved by the Fire District.
30. Construction Access Utilities - Prior to combustible construction, all utilities
located within the access road and the first lift of the access road pavement shall
be installed. A minimum 20 foot clear width shall remain free of obstruction
during any construction activities within the development once combustible
construction starts.
31. Access Road Location - The access / driveway shall be extended to within 150
feet of all portions of the exterior walls of the first story of any building and shall
be in accordance with Fire District access standards. Where the access roadway
cannot be provided, approved fire protection system or systems shall be installed
as required and acceptable to the Fire District.
32. Fire Lanes - Prior to construction, the applicant shall submit two (2) site plans to
the Fire District for approval of the location of fire lanes. Prior to occupancy, all
fire lanes shall be posted “NO PARKING-FIRE LANE-TOW AWAY” in
accordance with California Vehicle Code, the International Fire Code and current
VCFPD Fire Lane Standards. All signs and or Fire Lane markings shall be within
recorded access easements.
33. Fire Hydrant Installation - Prior to combustible construction on any parcel, a fire
hydrant capable of providing the required fire flow and duration shall be installed
and in service along the access road / driveway at a location approved by the
Fire District, but no further than 250 feet from the building site. The owner of the
combustible construction is responsible for the cost of this installation.
34. Fire Department Clearance - Applicant shall obtain VCFPD Form #126
"Requirements for Construction" prior to obtaining a building permit for any new
structures or additions to existing structures.
146165
Resolution No. 2020-____
Page 9
Ventura County Air Pollution Control District (VCAPCD)
35. The Permittee shall comply with the provisions of all applicable California State
Laws and Air Pollution Control District Rules and Regulations regarding portable
construction equipment and construction vehicles.
36. The Permittee shall comply with the provisions of applicable VCAPCD Rules and
Regulations, which include but are not limited to, Rule 50 (Opacity), Rule 51
(Nuisance), and Rule 55 (Fugitive Dust).
37. Operations shall be operated in accordance with the Rules and Regulations of
the Ventura County Air Pollution Control District, with emphasis on Rule 51,
Nuisance.
-End-
147166
February 01, 2021
Freddy A. Carillo
Associate Planner II
Community Development Department
City of Moorpark
799 Moorpark Avenue
Moorpark, CA 93021
Re: 5850 Condor Drive, Moorpark- Change in Utility Undergrounding
Dear Sir:
The original plan for the undergrounding the utility poles, the one currently approved by the city council,
is what we are calling the "Four pole plan". We now have a new design from Southern California Edison
Company (SCE) which we are calling "Two Pole Plan".
For the four pole plan, all three poles on the property are to be removed, as well as the pole south of
the property (which sits on the south corner of Condor drive and Virginia Colony Place at the city park.)
The additional pole had to be added to the project because it could not remain and be anchored
("guyed") without running the guy wire and anchor into the street.
The new two pole plan prepared by SCE has the two northern poles on the property being removed. The
southernmost pole on the property is to be relocated south to a point just north of the Condor
Drive sidewalk to allow the guy wire and anchor going north to fit within your landscaping and not
affecting the parking plan. This relocation allows the pole across the street at the park to remain. The
pole north of the property is to be relocated six feet to the east Uust off of the sidewalk) so that its guy
wire and anchor will be in the sidewalk rather than in the street.
So once completed, all four poles in front of the PennyMac building will remain, the next two poles
south (the ones on the property) will be gone, I will have one pole at the south property line and the
pole across Condor drive at the park will remain.
Below you will find the comparison of the two methods of the poles.
RULE 20C RULE 20B
2 Poles 4 Poles
SoCal Edison: $193,317.00 $173,868.00
Contractor: $585,000.00 $247,401.00
Total $778,317.00 $421,269.00
ATTACHMENT 6
167
I am requesting that the Council will consider the 2 poles method rather than the 5 poles.
I hope this explains more clearly what the planned change incorporates. I will include the two-pole SCE
design plan with this letter so you can more easily see the new design.
Also, we are requesting a second request to the city council to consider the installation of skylight to
said property. This would save energy by requiring less lighting in the warehouse and less heating.
This plans for such design is also being submitted by my Architect, Dave Osborn.
Should you have questions, please do not hesitate to let me know.
Thank you,
Paul Minoo
168
E
C
B
C
B
C
BC
B
S
C
BC
BC
B
C
B
T
D
W M
ICV
IC V
WMWM
T
C
BC
BC
B
C
B
W
M
W
M
D
S
EE
S
P
M
TSP
B
S
W
MW
MW
M
TSPBIC V
S63
°
4
0
'
5
9
"
E
80.00'N05°09'49"E321.80'N05°09'49"E155.00'S25°58'58"W20.67'4.00'
CON
C
RET
E
DRIV
E
WA
Y
CONCR
E
T
E
DRIVEW
A
Y
CONDORPRINCETON AVENUE
DRIVE
VIRGINIA COLONYCON
D
O
R DRIVE
PLACEPRINCETON AVENUE30'30'6 0'C
S
S
S
S
T
T TSPBTSPB
WM
WM
WM
WM
WM
WMWM
WM
CTVB
CB
CB
CB
CB
D
D
PM
ICV
ICV
ICV
25'-0"
P.U.E.
N52°22'46"E 152.31'L=10
0 .04'
R=47
0 .00'
L=135 .61'R=470 .00'
=16°31'
5
4"
N82°06'24"W 124.58'
N82°06'24"W 150.00'
N81°06'24"E 92.73'
R=270.00'L=64.83'R=35.00'=106°08'04"R=447.00' =23°12'38"L=181.08'3.21'
S82°06'24"E
N07°54'20"E 210.47'=12°11'44"N3
7
°
3
7
'
1
4
"W
2
5
7
.
7
3
'
1
2
'
X
5
0
'
X
1
4
'
LO
AD
ING
ZON
E
1
2
'
X
5
0
'
X
1
4
'
LO
AD
ING
ZON
E
1
2
'
X
5
0
'
X
1
4
'
LO
AD
ING
ZON
E
A
A
S
H
TO
W
B
-
4
0
AASHTO WB-409'-0"5'9'-0"HC8'-0"9'-0"HC±5'HC45'-0"5 STD. STALLS @ 9'-0" EA.6'-4"0.5% SLOPE FLOORSITE ADDRESS
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
A.P.N.
A.P.N.
A.P.N.
SITE AREA
ZONE:
CODE:
TYPE:
OCCUPANCY:
BUILDING AREA
PARKING REQUIRED
INDUSTRIAL (2/1000)
PARKING PROVIDED
STANDARD
DISABLED
MOTORCYCLE
TOTAL PARKING PROVIDED
BICYCLE PARKING
INTERIOR (LONG TERM)
EXTERIOR (SHORT TERM)
F.A.R.
COVERAGES
BUILDING (F.P. / SITE)
PAVING
LANDSCAPING
HARDSCAPE
PROJECT SUMMARY
5850 CONDOR DRIVE, MOORPARK, CA. 90321
LOTS 17,18 AND 31 OF TRACT NO. 3492, BOOK 95, PAGE 30
OF MAPS IN THE OFFICE OF COUNTY RECORDER, STATE OF
CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
513-060-175 LOT 17
513-060-185 LOT 18
513-060-315 LOT 31
150,948.91 S.F. (3.465 AC)
M-1
2019 CBC,CFC, CMC, CPC, CEC, CAL GREEN
lll - B - FULLY SPRINKLERED
S-1, F AND ACCESSORY B
48,787 SF
97 STALLS
107 STALLS
5 STALLS
4 STALLS
116 STALLS (2.38/1000)
( 6 ) REQ'D. / ( 6 ) PROV'D.
( 6 ) REQ'D. / ( 8 ) PROV'D.
48,787 SF = .32 / 1
48,787 SF = 32.3202 %
62,067 SF = 41.1179%
37,060 SF = 24.5513 %
3,035 SF = 2.0106 %
KEYNOTES
1. LANDSCAPING WITH 6" HIGH MACHINE FORMED CONCRETE CURB AND AUTOMATIC IRRIGATION
CONNECTED TO CENTRAL TIMER, TYP.
2. SEALED A .C. PAVING OVER BASE MATERIAL PER GEOTECHNICAL REPORT , TYP.
3. RECESSED TRUCK LOADING RAMP WITH 6" THICK CONCRETE TILT UP RETAINING WALLS TO MATCH BLDG.
AND 6" THICK REINFORCED CONCRETE SLAB WITH BROOM FINISH AND EXP. JOINTS - SEE SOILS REPORT
4. NEW REINFORCED CONCRETE APRON & CURB CUT AND PER CITY OF MOORPARK STANDARD
5. 3'-6" HIGH NATURAL CONCRETE GUARDWALL AT ENTRY STAIRS / DISABLED ACCES RAMP - CLEARSEALED
FINISH, TYP. - SEE EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS
6.24" X 24" SCORED & COLORED CONCRETE DRIVE APRON PER SOILS REPORT RECOMMENDATION WITH
CONCRETE RIBBON - DAVIS COLOR 61222 "EASTERN TAN" OR EQUAL.
7. 9'-0" X 18'-0" STANDARD PARKING STALL WITH 2'-0" OVERHANG AND PAINTED STRIPES, TYP. - SEE DETAIL
8. 5'-0" X 10'-0" MOTORCYCLE STALL WITH 6" THICK CONC . SLAB AND PAINTED STRIPES, TYP. - SEE DETAIL
9. 9'-0" X 18'-0" HANDICAPPED PARKING STALL WITH 5' WIDE LOADING AREA ( 8' WIDE @ VAN ACCESS .)
PROVIDE SIGNAGE AND PAINTED STRIPES, TYP. - PER TITLE 24
10. 4'-0" WIDE (MIN .) X 4" THICK REINFORCED CONC . WALK WITH BROOM FINISH AND SAW CUT CONTROL
JOINTS AT 4'-0" O.C., TYP. - PROVIDE TRUNCATED WARNING DEVICES AS REQUIRED.
11 . 4'-0" X 9'-0" TREE WELL WITH 6" CONCRETE CURB AND AUTOMATIC IRRIGATION , TYP.
12.10' X 12' DOCK HIGH OVERHEAD TRUCK DOOR , TYP.
13.12' X 14' GRADE LEVEL OVERHEAD TRUCK DOOR , TYP.
14.3' X 7' EXIT / MAN DOOR , TYP.
15. 3'-0" WIDE METAL CANOPY (OPEN) WITH S.S. SCREEN, TYP.- PAINTED FASCIA / FRAMING
16. DISABLED PATH OF TRAVEL TO MAIN ENTRY, TYP.
17.6" THICK REINFORCED CONCRETE TRUCK MANUEVERING AREA PER SOILS REPORT RECOMMENDATION.
18. 9'-0" HIGH CONC . TILT UP SCREEN WALL AND TRASH ENCLOSURE WITH SOLID METAL GATES AND SOLID
COVER PTD. TO MATCH BUILDING. SANDBLAST WALLS (BOTH SIDES) - SEE DETAIL
19. CONCRETE TRANSFORMER PAD WITH NEW PIPE GUARDS AS REQUIRED - SEE ELECTRICAL PLANS
20. 3'-6" HIGH NATURAL CONCRETE GUARDWALL AT ENTRY STAIRS / DISABLED ACCESS RAMP W/
CLEARSEALED FINISH, TYP.
21. PNUEMATICALLY PLACED REINFORCED "SHOTCRETE" RETAINING WALL (HEIGHT VARIES) WITH
SCORED "STONE" APPEARANCE EARTHTONE COLORS - BY GENERAL CONTRACTOR UNDER SEPARATE
CONTRACT AND PERMIT.
22. 12'(W) X 50'(L) X 14' (H) TRUCK LOADING ZONE PER CITY STANDARD, TYP. (2)
23. NEW BICYCLE RACKS BY CYCLESAFE OR EQ. ON REINFORCED CONC . PAD, TYP. - SEE DETAIL BELOW
24. PROVIDE NEW CONCRETE SIDEWALK PER CITY STANDARD PLATE. JOIN TO EXISTING SIDEWALK
AS OCCURS - SEE CIVIL PLANS.
25. 3'-0" WIDE METAL CANOPY WITH SOLID ROOF, TYP.- PAINTED
26. CAR / VAN POOL CLEAN AIR PARKING STALLS, TYP. OF (11) - PLACES.
IN THE PAINT USED FOR PARKING STALL STRIPING, SUCH THAT THE LOWER EDGE OF THE LAST WORD
ALIGNS WITH THE END OF THE STALL STRIPING BENEATH PARKED VEHICLE:
27.(7) - FUTURE ELECTRIC VEHICLE PARKING STALLS. PROVIDE CONDUIT AND WIRING FOR FUTURE SINGLE ARM
OR DUAL ARM CHARGING UNIT FOR EACH STALL.
A TOTAL OF (18) ELECTRIC (FUTURE) AND / OR CLEAN AIR PARKING STALLS PROVIDED.
PAINT, IN THE PAINT USED FOR PARKING STALL STRIPING, SUCH THAT THE LOWER EDGE OF THE LAST WORD
ALIGNS WITH THE END OF THE STALL STRIPING BENEATH PARKED VEHICLE:30'-0"DRIVE AISLE15'-0"PER F.D.DH
DH
DH
GL
236'±62'-3"72'±
9
6
'
-
2
"96'DH
10
10
107
7
6
6
6
6
2
2
10
10
10
10
2
1
1
2
3
4
4
6
18
8
9
10
12
12
14
12
12
25
63'-0"7 STD. STALLS @ 9'-0" EA.54'-0"6 STD. STALL
S
@ 9'-0" EACH
9'-0"
54'-0"6 STD. STALL
S
@ 9'-0" EACH
10'-0"
90'-0"10 STD. STALLS
@ 9'-0" EACH 9'-0"
90'-0"10 STD. STALLS
@ 9'-0" EACH 9'-0"8'-0"9'-0"26'-0"DRIVE AISLE18'-0"10'-0"90'-0"
10 STD. STALLS
@ 9'-0" EACH
90'-0"
10 STD. ST
A
L
L
S
@ 9'-0" EA
C
H
5'-0"
1
1
±18'-6"
±19'-6"
±5'-0"
90'-0"
10 STD.
S
T
A
L
L
S @ 9'-0" E
A
C
H
63'-
0
"
7 S
T
D
.
S
T
A
L
L
S
@ 9'-
0
"
E
A
.
±6'-0"
±10'-0"
±10'-0"
±16'-9"
±16'-3"
9'-0"30'-0"DRIV
E
AI
SL
E 9'-0"10'-0"9'-0"19'-0"30'-0"DRIVE
AISLE
±35'-0"14
13
14
19
10'-
0
"
11
22
22
22
22
1
9
7
2
2
5
5
DISABLED PATH OF TRAVEL
FROM PROJECT BOUNDARY
SEE CIVIL PLANS
18
17
7
11
7
7
7
8
21
2121
1
1
1
1
1
7
7 ±3'-6"±3'-6"±34'-0"SETBAC
K
20'-0"20'-0"26'-0"DRIVE AISLE18'-0"18'-
0
"
26'-
0
"
DRI
V
E
A
I
S
L
E
±
1
0
1
'
-
7
"
S
E
TB
AC
K 15'-0"0.5% SLOPE FLOOR15
15
115
15
4'-0"1
1
23
23
JOIN (N) SIDEWALK
TO (E) SIDEWALK
(LOCATION APPX.)
SEE CIVIL PLANS
24
24
24
24
24 ±34'-0"SETBACK11'-0"68'-6"SCREE
N
WALL
±
2
3
5
'
-
9
"RE
T
A
IN
ING
W
A
L
L
±241'-4"
RETAINING W
A
L
L
COORDINATE DRAIN / SUMP PUMP
DISCHARGE LOCATION WITH CIVIL
PLANS
2
6
'
-
0
"DRIVE
A
IS
LE
1
8
'
-
0
"
1
0
'
-
0
"
4
9
'
-
0
"
D
R
I
V
E
A
I
S
L
E
6'-0"
35'-0"
SETBACK BY CC&R
ENTRY
ENTRY
2
0
'
-
0
"
3
8
'
-
0
"
5
3
9
9
9
7
EV
CA
EV EV
CA CA
EV
CA CA CA
CA CA CA CA CA EV EV EV
35'-0"
SETBACK BY CC&R
6'88'184'-0"BUILDINGONE STORY CONCRETE TILT UP
INDUSTRIAL BUILDING
48,787 S.F. / 116 STALLS (2.38/1000)
38'-0" TOP OF PARAPET / 30'-0" CLEAR INTERIOR
304'-0"
BUILDING
25'-0"
P.U.E.
14
10
4
'
-
0
"
3
254'
TRUNCATED DOMES
SEE 9
T-24-8
9
T-24-8
TRUNCATED DOMES
SEE
TRUNCATED DOMES
SEE 9
T-24-8
6'-8"18'-0"20'-0"POLE LINE(E) PP#2774202E
RELOCATE
SOUTH
CA
R
O
V
E
R
H
A
N
G
(N)LOCATION OF
PP#2774202E2'-0"(N)GUY ANCHOR
PP
(E) PP#2774203E
TO BE MOVED
UNDERGROUND
(E) PP#2774201E
TO REMAIN
(E) PP#2774204E
TO BE MOVED
UNDERGROUND
(E) PP#2774205E
(OFF-SITE)
TO BE RELOCATED
**3'-0"**3'-0"3'-0"6'-0"1'-10 1/8"BICYCLE RACK
PROVIDE A TOTAL OF (4) FOUR "U"
BIKE RACK(S) WITH CROSS BAR
FOR SITE BY: CYCLESAFE OR EQ.
(616) 954-9977
**VERIFY DIMENSION WITH
VENDOR
REINFORCED CONC.
PAD 6'-0"5376 N. Sterling Center Drive
Westlake Village, CA 91361
Phone 818. 706. 3997
Fax 818. 706. 2453
Date:
Job:
Drawn by:
Revisions
Sheet :
THIS DOCUMENT, AND THE IDEAS AND DESIGNS
HEREIN, AS AN INSTRUMENT OF PROFESSIONAL
SERVICES, IS THE PROPERTY OF JDO+ASSOCIATES, INC.
AND IS NOT TO BE USED, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, FOR
ANY PROJECT WITHOUT THE WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION
OF JDO+ASSOCIATES, INC.
SITE PLAN
SITE PLAN
NOV. 16, 2020
AREAS AND COVERAGES ARE PRELIMINARY
AND SUBJECT TO CHANGE UPON REVIEW SC: 1" = 20'-0"
A-1.0
2018.12
VICINITY MAP
N.T.S.
PROJECT LOCATION
NEW INDUSTRIAL
BUILDING FOR
5850 CONDOR DRIVE
MOORPARK, CALIF.
4M INVESTMENT
CORPORATION
TYPICAL PARKING STALLS20'-0" (SEE SITE PLAN)4" WIDE PTD. STRIPE,
TYP. TO MATCH CITY
PARKING STANDARD
FIELD VERIFY PRIOR
TO PAINTING
9'-0"
(SEE SITE PLAN)
2'-0" (OVERHANG)10'-0"MOTORCYCLE(SEE SITE PLAN)4" WIDE PTD. STRIPE,
TYP. TO MATCH CITY
PARKING STANDARD
FIELD VERIFY PRIOR
TO PAINTING
5'-0" EACH
MOTORCYCLE
(SEE SITE PLAN)
MOTORCYCLE
STANDARD
TRASH ENCLOSURE
PIPE SLEEVE FOR CANE
BOLTS OPEN AND CLOSED
POSITION, TYP.
19'-0"9'-6"CONCRETEAPRON(4)- 4 YD. BINS (3' X 6' X 4')
8" HIGH x 6" WIDE CONC.
CURBS, TYP.
SOLID CORRIGATED METAL
GATES (180° SWING)
CONCRETE TILT-UP
PANEL - PANEL (PAINTED
ALL AROUND)4'-6"9'-0"9'-0"8'-0"CLEARSOLID CORRIGATED
METAL ROOF, TYP.6'-0"2"CANE BOLT,
TYP.9'-0"NORTH
ATTACHMENT 7
169
5376 N. Sterling Center Drive
Westlake Village, CA 91361
Phone 818. 706. 3997
Fax 818. 706. 2453
Date:
Job:
Drawn by:
Revisions
Sheet :
THIS DOCUMENT, AND THE IDEAS AND DESIGNS
HEREIN, AS AN INSTRUMENT OF PROFESSIONAL
SERVICES, IS THE PROPERTY OF JD0+ASSOCIATES, INC.
AND IS NOT TO BE USED, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, FOR
ANY PROJECT WITHOUT THE WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION
OF JDO+ASSOCIATES, INC.
SC: 1/16" = 1'-0"
NEW INDUSTRIAL
BUILDING FOR
5850 CONDOR DRIVE
MOORPARK, CALIF.
4M INVESTMENT
CORPORATION
2018.12
NORTHWORKINGNORTHAC
1
AC
2
CU
1 EF
2
EF
3
4
EF
1
GV
1
GV
EF
1
ROOF PLAN45.00°135.00°304'-0"
236'-0"68'-0"
56'-0"184'-0"40'-0"48'-0"48'-0"48'-0"±96'-2"62'-2 3/4"52'-0"50'-0"52'-0"50'-0"44'-0"72'-0"2 3 4 5 6
5.1
BLDG.CORNERF.O.W.F.O.W.C.L. COL., TYP.BLDG.CORNERF.O.W.F.O.W.
F.O.W.
A
E
A
E
B
C
D
B
C
D 184'-0"48'-0"48'-0"48'-0"40'-0"B.1
C.1
BLDG. CORNER
BLDG. CORNER 68'-0"44'-0"1 717
1 7
304'-0"F.O.W.56'-0"52'-0"50'-0"52'-0"50'-0"
2 3 4 5 6C.L. COL., TYP.C.L. COL., TYP.F.O.W.F.O.W.
X
X.1
Y
Y.1
C.L. COL. AND
FACE OF WALL
D.1
D.2
1.1 1.2 1.3 5.25.1
D.1
D.29'-0"3'-0"76'-0"17'-0"3'-0"17'-0"3'-0"9'-0"3'-0"AWNING
BELOW36'-5"CRICKET
A-6.0
ROOF PLAN33'-7"BUILT-UP
CRICKET
33'-2"BUILT-UP
CRICKET 34'-9"33'-5"35'-8"34'-2"SPRAY-ON INSULATION
SEE NOTE #3 ON SHEET
D-1, TYP.
1.TOP OF PARAPET TO BE: 38-0" A .F.F. - SEE EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS.
2.ROOF HEIGHTS:
3. SEE MECHANICAL PLANS FOR ALL ROOF OPENINGS AND MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT.0'-0" = TOP OF ROOF PLYWOOD SHEATHING.0'-0" = CLEAR HEIGHTROOF NOTES:
ROOF HATCH - COORDINATE
WITH FLOOR PLAN
4'-0" x 8'-0" SKYLIGHT / SMOKE VENT
360° FUSIBLE LINK WITH BUILT-UP
CRICKET ON HIGH SIDE (UL 793), TYP.
17
D-4
PROVIDE BLOCKING AS
REQUIRED, TYP.
ROUTE R.D. AND O.F.D. BELOW
ROOF LINE AND RUN LEADERLINE
DOWN CONCRETE WALL±31'-4"±30'-8"±32'-2"35'-4"
9
D-4
TYP.
PARAPET
9
D-4
TYP.
PARAPET
9
D-4
TYP.
PARAPET
9
D-4
TYP.
PARAPET
9
D-4
TYP.
PARAPET
9
D-4
TYP.
PARAPET
PARAPET AT
CURTAIN WALL
10
D-4
PARAPET AT
CURTAIN WALL
10
D-427'-2"26'-2"
EXTENDED ROOF
SCREEN - SEE
STRUCTURAL
EXTENDED ROOF
SCREEN - SEE
STRUCTURAL
POSSIBLE FUTURE
SOLAR FIELD
POSSIBLE FUTURE
SOLAR FIELD
44'-6"±36'-0"±23'-4"SEPT. 29, 2020
DIAGONAL BRACING AT ROOF
SCREEN AND CURTAIN WALL
SEE STRUCTURAL, TYP.
6
D-4.1
5
D-4.1
R.D. AND O.F.D., TYP.
SEE PLUMBING
PLANS FOR SIZE
10
D-4
10
D-4
10
D-4
10
D-4
10
D-4
10
D-4
8
D-4
9
D-4.1±33'-8"±31'-5"34'-11"34'-11"±32'-2"±31'-3"ROOF SLOPE 1/4" PER FOOT33'-7"±31'4"33'-7"±31'-4"33'-6"32'-11"±30'-8"32'-11"32'-11`"±30'-8"33'-7"±31'-4"32'-11"±30'-8"33'-10"33'-7"TOP OF RTU'S
±4'-11" ABOVE
ROOF SHT'G.
(±39'-1" A .F.F.)33'-7"32'-11"36'-5"±33'-8"36'-5"±33'-8"36'-5"±33'-8"36'-5"±33'-8"36'-5"±33'-8"35'-8"±32'-2"35'-8"±32'-2"35'-8"±32'-2"35'-8"±32'-2"35'-8"±32'-2"35'-8"±32'-2"±31'-5"34'-11"±31'-5"34'-11"±31'-5"34'-11"±31'-5"34'-11"±31'-5"34'-11"34'-2"±30'-8"34'-2"±30'-8"34'-2"±30'-8"34'-2"±30'-8"34'-2"±30'-8"31'-3"30'-8"TOP OF RTU'S
±2'-4" ABOVE
ROOF SHT'G.
(±36'-9" A .F.F.)
TOP OF RTU'S
±2'-9" ABOVE
ROOF SHT'G.
(±37'-2" A .F.F.)
TOP OF RTU'S
±2'-9" ABOVE
ROOF SHT'G.
(±37'-2" A .F.F.)
TOP OF RTU'S
±2'-0" ABOVE
ROOF SHT'G.
(±36'-1" A .F.F.)
TOP OF RTU'S
±2'-0" ABOVE
ROOF SHT'G.
(±36'-1" A .F.F.)
TOP OF RTU'S
±2'-9" ABOVE
ROOF SHT'G.
(±37'-2" A .F.F.)
TOP OF PARAPET
+38'-0" A .F.F.
TOP OF PARAPET
+38'-0" A .F.F.
TOP OF ROOF
SCREEN +41'-6" A .F.F.
TOP OF ROOF
SCREEN +41'-6" A .F.F.
ATTACHMENT 8
170
ATTACHMENT 9
RESOLUTION NO. 2021-_____
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
MOORPARK, APPROVING MODIFICATION NO. 1 TO
INDUSTRIAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMIT (IPD) NO. 2019-
01 AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (CUP) NO. 2020-02 TO
MODIFY CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL OF A PREVIOUSLY-
APPROVED INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT PROJECT LOCATED
AT 5850 CONDOR DRIVE REQUIRING ALL UTILITIES TO BE
PLACED UNDERGROUND AND TO PERMIT THE INSTALLATION
OF SKYLIGHTS, AND MAKING A DETERMINATION OF
EXEMPTION UNDER CEQA IN CONNECTION THEREWITH, ON
THE APPLICATION OF PAUL MINOO FOR 4M INVESTMENT
CORPORATION
WHEREAS, on July 15, 2020, the City Council conducted a duly noticed public
hearing and adopted Resolution No. 2020-3935 approving IPD No. 2019-01 and CUP
2020-02 to allow the development of a 48,787 square–foot, single-story industrial building
and associated site improvements on an undeveloped 3.46-acre of property addressed
5850 Condor Drive; and
WHEREAS, on February 1, 2021, an application was filed for Modification No. 1 to
IPD No. 2019-01 and CUP No. 2020-02 to modify conditions of approval requiring all
utilities to be placed underground and to permit the installation of skylights at 5850 Condor
Drive; and
WHEREAS, at a duly noticed public hearing on April 7, 2021, the City Council
considered the agenda report for Modification No. 1 to IPD No. 2019-01 and CUP No.
2020-02 and any supplements thereto and written public comments; opened comments,
opened the public hearing and took and considered public testimony both for and against
the proposal; and reached a decision on this matter; and
WHEREAS, the Community Development Director has determined that this
project, as amended by Modification No. 1, is consistent with the environmental
determination for IPD No. 2019-01 and CUP No. 2020-02 and, furthermore, that
Modification No.1 is exempt from environmental review pursuant to Section 15301 (Class
1: Existing Facilities) of the California Environmental Quality Act because the request is
limited to the undergrounding of publicly-owned utilities and the addition of skylights to a
previously-approved development. Therefore, no further environmental documentation
is required.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK,
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTATION: The City Council concurs
with the Community Development Director that Modification No. 1 to IPD No. 2019-01
and CUP No. 2020-02 is exempt from environmental review, pursuant to Section 15301
(Class 1: Existing Facilities) of the California Environmental Quality Act.
171
Resolution No. 2021-_____
Page 2
SECTION 2. CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL: The City Council approves:
A. Modification No. 1 to IPD No. 2019-01 and CUP No. 2020-02, subject to
Standard and Special Conditions of Approval included in Exhibit A, attached hereto and
incorporated herein by reference.
B. Prior to issuance of grading permit, the Applicant shall submit revised plans
depicting the undergrounding of two on-site poles and the relocation of the southerly most
on-site pole consistent with approved plans. Any further exceptions must be reviewed
and approved by the City Council. Special Condition No. 40 supersedes Standard
Condition of Approval No. 145.
C. Allow Skylights are permitted consistent with plans approved by the City
Engineer, Public Works Director and Community Development Director. Special
Condition No. 41 supersedes Standard Condition of Approval No. 43.
SECTION 3. CERTIFICATE OF ADOPTION: The City Clerk shall certify to the
adoption of this resolution and shall cause a certified resolution to be filed in the book or
original resolutions.
PASSED, AND ADOPTED this 7th day of April, 2021.
Janice S. Parvin, Mayor
ATTEST:
Kyle Spangler, City Clerk
Exhibit A –Special Conditions of Approval for Modification No. 1 to Industrial Planned
Development No. 2019-01 and Conditional Use Permit No. 2020-02
172
Resolution No. 2021-_____
Page 3
EXHIBIT A
STANDARD AND SPECIAL CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR MODIFICATION NO.
1 TO INDUSTRIAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 2019-01 AND
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2020-02
STANDARD CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
The applicant shall comply with Standard Conditions of Approval for Subdivisions and
Planned Developments as adopted by City Council Resolution No. 2009-2799 (Exhibit
A), except as modified by the following Special Conditions of Approval. In the event of
conflict between a Standard and Special Condition of Approval, the Special Condition
shall apply.
SPECIAL CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
40. Prior to issuance of grading permit, the Applicant shall submit revised plans depicting
the undergrounding of two on-site poles and the relocation of the southerly most on-site
pole consistent with approved plans. Any further exceptions must be reviewed and
approved by the City Council. Special Condition No. 40 supersedes Standard Condition
of Approval No. 145.
41. Skylights are permitted consistent with plans approved by the City Engineer, Public
Works Director and Community Development Director. Special Condition No. 41
supersedes Standard Condition of Approval No. 43.
End-
173