Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAGENDA REPORT 2021 0616 CCSA REG ITEM 08ACITY OF MOORPARK, 
CALIFORNIA City Council Meeting of June 16, 2021 ACTION APPROVED STAFF RECOMMENDATION INCLUDING ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION NO. 2021- 4011 (VOICE VOTE: UNANIMOUS). BY B. Garza A. Consider Resolution to Modify Condition of Approval of a Previously-Approved Industrial Development Located at 5850 Condor Drive Requiring All Utilities to be Placed Underground, to Permit the Instillation of Skylights, and Making a Determination of Exemption Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act in Connection Therewith, on the Application of Paul Minoo (4M Investment Corporation). Staff Recommendation: 1) Open the public hearing, accept public testimony and close the public hearing; and 2) Adopt Resolution No. 2021-4011 approving Modification No. 1 to IPD No. 2019-01 and CUP No. 2020-02, subject to the conditions of approval contained therein, and allowing one utility pole to be relocated on-site and two poles to be placed underground and allowing skylights on the rooftop of the previously-approved development. (Staff: Freddy Carrillo) Item: 8.A. Item: 8.A. MOORPARK CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT TO: Honorable City Council FROM: Freddy A. Carrillo, Associate Planner ll DATE: 06/16/2021 Regular Meeting SUBJECT: Consider a Resolution to Modify Conditions of Approval of a Previously-Approved Industrial Development Located at 5850 Condor Drive Requiring All Utilities to be Placed Underground, to Permit the Installation of Skylights, and Making a Determination of Exemption Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act in Connection Therewith, on the Application of Paul Minoo (4M Investment Corporation) PROJECT DESCRIPTION On February 1, 2021, Paul Minoo (for 4M Investment Corporation) (Applicant) filed an application to modify conditions of approval of a previously-approved industrial development project at 5850 Condor Drive requiring all utilities to be placed underground and prohibiting the installation of skylights. Both conditions of approval are set forth in Resolution No. 2009-2799 establishing standard conditions of approval for entitlement projects, adopted by the City Council on March 18, 2009. Standard Condition of Approval No. 145: Prior to issuance of the first building permit, all existing and proposed utilities, including electrical transmission lines less than 67Kv, must be under-grounded consistent with plans approved by the City Engineer, Public Works Director and Community Development Director. Any exceptions must be approved by the City Council. Standard Condition of Approval No. 43: Skylights are prohibited unless approved through the Planned Development Permit process or as a Modification to the Planned Development Permit. (This Condition Applies to Commercial/Industrial and Multi-family Residential Projects) 1 Honorable City Council 06/16/2021 Regular Meeting Page 2 The Moorpark Municipal Code allows for a Permit Modification for any proposed change to a discretionary permit that exceeds the criteria of a permit adjustment but is not extensive enough to be considered a substantial or fundamental change in the approved entitlement or use relative to the permit, would not have a substantial adverse impact on surrounding properties and would not change any findings contained in the environmental documentation prepared for the permit. The decision on the permit modification shall be by the decision-making body that approved the original permit, in this case the City Council. BACKGROUND On November 13, 2019, Mr. Minoo filed an application for an Industrial Planned Development (IPD) to develop a 48,787 square-foot, single story industrial building and associated site improvements on a 3.46-acre site at 5850 Condor Drive (Attachments 1 and 2). The building features contemporary industrial architecture with two separate entry ways to provide the property owner the opportunity to subdivide the space in the future and lease the building to two tenants. The project also provides associated public and private improvements, including a parking lot with 112 parking spaces, four truck loading spaces, landscaping, and other improvements. A copy of the site plan is included as Attachment 3. The request also included a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) to allow the proposed building height above the maximum height permitted within the Industrial Park (M-1) zone. In addition, the Applicant submitted a request for the City to fund $469,398 for the undergrounding of on-site and off-site utility poles. On July 15, 2020, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2020-3935 (Attachment 4), approving IPD No. 2019-01 and CUP No. 2020-02 for the development of the industrial development. However, the Council was not in favor of providing City funds to offset the costs for undergrounding utility poles. The Council discussed a variety of options that the Applicant could consider as an alternative to City funding, which might include a revised undergrounding plan or the formation of a Community Facilities District to provide a more accurate fair-share, pro-rata cost to the Applicant. Although the Council discussed options that might provide financial relief for the Applicant, the Council requested that this item return for further consideration once the Applicant worked with Southern California Edison (SCE) and City staff to determine a viable solution that minimized the undergrounding of off-site poles. As a result, the Council denied the Applicant’s funding request. A copy of the Staff Report is included as Attachment 5. On February 1, 2021, the Applicant submitted a request to relocate the on-site pole on the southwest corner of the project site approximately 38-feet south from the current location and undergrounding the two remaining on-site utility poles to the north. Additionally, SCE required the Applicant to relocate the off-site pole north of the project site approximately five feet east into an existing landscape area and remove the guy wire across the street on Princeton Avenue. The public hearing was scheduled for the Council meeting on April 7, 2021; however, the Applicant contacted by SCE days prior to the 2 Honorable City Council 06/16/2021 Regular Meeting Page 3 meeting and notified that a 12-foot-wide easement encroaching into the adjacent property (6101 Condor Drive/PennyMac Loan Services) was required for the relocation of the off- site utility pole to the north of the Applicant’s property. The property owner had no interest in granting the easement, thus making this scope of work infeasible. On April 6, 2021, the Applicant requested to continue the meeting in order to work with SCE on redesigning the project to eliminate the requirement to obtain an easement on the adjacent private property. The item was taken off the City Council calendar and has been re-noticed for consideration at the June 16, 2021 Council meeting. DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS There are three existing wooden utility poles on the project site that are distribution lines that serve the adjacent community but do not serve the project site. The project site will attain power from an existing underground source located on Condor Drive. These lines are less than 67Kv and are therefore required to be undergrounded by Standard Condition of Approval No. 145. However, if that occurs, SCE requires the Applicant to underground one additional off-site pole located on the southeast corner of Condor Drive and Virginia Colony Place. This is necessary because the removal of the three on-site poles would require the Virginia Colony pole to be supported by a new guy wire. There is not sufficient room in the proximity of the pole to safely locate the guy wire, therefore this pole must be undergrounded as well. This option is further referred to as the “four- pole” plan. Undergrounding Utilities The California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) Undergrounding Program outlines policies and procedures for the conversion of overhead utility lines and equipment to underground facilities. Referred to as Rule 20, the CPUC policies and procedures also outline who is responsible for paying certain costs related to undergrounding. Rule 20 determines the level of ratepayer funding for different undergrounding arrangements and indicates if a project will receive public funds or otherwise require private funding. Rule 20 is broken into three categories that could apply in Moorpark: Rule 20A, Rule 20B, and Rule 20C. • Rule 20A projects are those that are paid for fully by the customers and ratepayers and not privately by a specific developer. Rule 20A undergrounding projects are typically located in the public realm and serve a public interest, such as in scenic areas and must be nominated by the local jurisdiction for consideration. • Rule 20B projects are those that are partially funded by public funds, where funds subsidize the cost of the undergrounding. Such projects do not qualify for Rule 20A, but meet other minimum criteria, for example the project should involve both sides of a street and underground lines for a minimum of 600 feet. Rule 20B projects typically receive 20 to 40 percent reimbursement. • Rule 20C projects bear the full cost of undergrounding and receive only a small credit for salvage costs of facilities that do not move underground. 3 Honorable City Council 06/16/2021 Regular Meeting Page 4 The project’s initial undergrounding plan to remove four poles (three on-site and one off- site) would have qualified as a Rule 20C project, requiring the developer to bear the full cost for undergrounding. The preliminary cost estimate from SCE for this Rule 20C Project is $193,317. In order to receive a final actual cost from SCE, the Applicant would need to pay additional fees to SCE for the design work. The Applicant’s contractor is also responsible to perform some work associated with the undergrounding of utilities. The Applicant provided a cost estimate of $585,000 for this additional work. Therefore, the total preliminary cost of undergrounding the four utility poles would be approximately $778,317. A final cost estimate has not been generated for this scenario. The Applicant had the option to remove one additional off-site utility pole and guy pole on Princeton Avenue north of the project site in addition to the three on-site poles and one off-site pole at Condor Drive and Virginia Colony Place. Doing so would qualify the project for Rule 20B. Rule 20B projects qualify for SCE credit and are less expensive to the Applicant. The actual cost from SCE for a proposed five pole scope of work (three on- site and two off-site) Rule 20B Project is $109,398. The Applicant has also indicated that the work performed by the contractor would have the same cost estimate of $585,000. The total cost of undergrounding the five utility poles would be approximately $694,398. This option is further referred to as the “five-pole” plan. Applicant’s Request, the “Two-Pole Plan” The diagram below summarizes the optional pole plans, cost, and location of existing utility poles. Staff has worked diligently with the Applicant and SCE to identify a new design that is feasible, less costly, and will not require an easement from a private property owner. . The Applicant is now requesting to relocate the on-site utility pole (No. 2 on the exhibit below) on the southwest corner of the project site approximately 25-feet south from its current location, which would require the installation of a new down guy pole 15 feet south of the utility pole for support. The two remaining on-site utility poles (Nos. 3 and 4 on exhibit below) to the north would be underground. Additionally, SCE is requiring the Applicant to add anchor wires to the off-site pole north of the project site (No. 5 on exhibit below) for reinforcement. As a result, an easement from the adjacent property owner (6101 Condor Drive/PennyMac Loan Services) will not be needed. However, in order to provide room for the installation of the anchor wires, the Applicant will be required to relocate the existing “warning” traffic signal light 10-feet south from the existing location onto the sidewalk (public property). This scope of work would qualify for Rule 20C and would be approximately $346,630 paid for entirely by the Applicant. This plan is referred to as the “two-pole plan”. The Applicant’s request letter is included as Attachment 6. 4 Honorable City Council 06/16/2021 Regular Meeting Page 5 Exhibit 1: Utility Pole Undergrounding Scenarios Due to site constraints limiting the ability to underground all three on-site poles, which require additional undergrounding of off-site poles, the proposed two-pole plan would provide appropriate public benefit improving the aesthetics of the project site’s street frontage and allowing future improvements beyond the project site to benefit from the Applicant’s undergrounding. The two-pole plan would not require public funding from the City of Moorpark and all costs would be paid by the Applicant. The remaining on-site pole, located near the corner of Princeton Avenue and Condor Avenue would be located near the southwest corner of the site, within a landscaped area and would not impact the onsite parking or circulation (Attachment 7). The two-pole plan would not have a significant negative impact on the aesthetic quality of the project site. *Proposed Relocate 2 Remove 1, 2, 3 and 4 Remove 1, 2, 3, 4 and 6 Relocate 5 $778,317 $694,398 5 Honorable City Council 06/16/2021 Regular Meeting Page 6 Current Standard Condition of Approval No. 145: Prior to issuance of the first building permit, all existing and proposed utilities, including electrical transmission lines less than 67Kv, must be under-grounded consistent with plans approved by the City Engineer, Public Works Director and Community Development Director. Any exceptions must be approved by the City Council. Proposed Special Condition of Approval No. 40: Prior to issuance of grading permit, the Applicant shall submit revised plans depicting the undergrounding of two on-site poles and the relocation of the southerly most on-site pole consistent with approved plans. Any further exceptions must be reviewed and approved by the City Council. Special Condition No. 40 supersedes Standard Condition of Approval No. 145. Skylights The Applicant is also requesting waiver of Standard Condition of Approval No. 43 that prohibits the use of skylights on the project site. The Applicant proposes to install 37 roof- mounted skylights, as shown on the roof plan (Attachment 8). Generally, projects are prohibited from installing skylights through the application of Standard Conditions of Approval. Staff researched previous entitlements dating back to the mid-90’s and believe that the condition to prohibit skylights was in response to security concerns. Skylights could provide access for burglars to enter the building. Other concerns related to glare and light pollution may have led to the creation of this standard condition. It is practical to examine each proposed commercial and industrial building to avoid any significant affects that may arise due to security concerns and the light-transmitting sources. Skylights provide an opportunity for the project to achieve daylighting requirements of the interior spaces of the building, complying with Green Building Code and providing cost and energy saving benefits to the future tenant(s). In this circumstance, the skylights also act as emergency smoke ventilation, as they can be opened or triggered to allow ventilation of the building in case of a fire. The skylights would be completely screened from view off-site by a roof parapet, which stands roughly three feet taller than the roof surface, with the skylights standing roughly two- and one-half feet above the roof. The roof parapet would screen the proposed skylights from nearby rights-of-way and adjacent properties. The project does not propose any ladders on the exterior of the building which would provide access to the roof. Preventative measures such as installing a security system/video surveillance are encouraged to prevent intruders. It is also recommended that the Applicant submit the Ventura County Sheriff’s Office Video Surveillance Camera Registry Form to grant dispatch permission to access video surveillance cameras. 6 Honorable City Council 06/16/2021 Regular Meeting Page 7 Although glare or light spillover may be a concern arising from use of skylights, the nearest residential home that could be potentially affected by this proposal is approximately 500 feet away from the approved industrial building. Additionally, the project site is heavily screened from view of nearby residential and industrial uses by existing established sycamore and pine trees. The project also includes a landscape plan that provides numerous new trees that would provide additional screening of the site from nearby areas. The applicant has indicated that the building will be using fewer interior lights due to the incorporation of skylights and therefore potential offsite lighting concerns would be minimal. Skylights have an overall effect of energy savings and reduced carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions. The bright, natural light provided by skylights help create a pleasant environment, improve employee concentration, improve the building's functionality, and reduce energy consumption. Lastly, although the Standard Condition of Approval prohibiting skylights has been applied to numerous projects, several existing developments in the vicinity have skylights and have not resulted in complaints or identified concerns. Current Standard Condition of Approval No. 43: Skylights are prohibited unless approved through the Planned Development Permit process or as a Modification to the Planned Development Permit. (This Condition Applies to Commercial/Industrial and Multi-family Residential Projects) Proposed Special Condition of Approval No. 41: Skylights are permitted consistent with plans approved by the Community Development Director. Special Condition No. 41 supersedes Standard Condition of Approval No. 43. NOTICING Public Notice for this meeting was given consistent with Chapter 17.44.070 of the Zoning Ordinance as follows: 1. Publication. The notice of the public hearing was published in the Ventura County Star on June 6, 2021. 2. Mailing. The notice of the public hearing was mailed on June 4, 2021, to owners of real property, as identified on the latest adjusted Ventura County Tax Assessor Roles, within one thousand (1,000) feet of the exterior boundaries of the assessor’s parcel(s) subject to the hearing. 3. Sign. Two 32 square-foot signs were placed on the street frontage on June 3, 2021. 7 Honorable City Council 06/16/2021 Regular Meeting Page 8 PROCESSING TIME LIMITS Time limits have been established for the processing of development projects under the Permit Streamlining Act (Government Code Title 7, Division 1, Chapter 4.5), the Subdivision Map Act (Government Code Title 7, Division 2), and the California Environmental Quality Act Statutes and Guidelines (Public Resources Code Division 13, and California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Chapter 3). Under the applicable provisions of these regulations, the following timelines have been established for action on this project: Date Application Submitted: February 1, 2021 Date Application Determined Complete: May 26, 2021 City Council Action Deadline: July 25, 2021 ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION In accordance with the City’s environmental review procedures adopted by resolution, the Interim Community Development Director or designee determines the level of review necessary for a project to comply with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Some projects may be exempt from review based upon a specific category listed in CEQA. Other projects may be exempt under a general rule that environmental review is not necessary where it can be determined that there would be no possibility of a significant effect upon the environment. A project which does not qualify for an exemption requires the preparation of an Initial Study to assess the level of potential environmental impacts. The Interim Community Development Director has determined that this project, as amended by Modification No. 1, is consistent with the environmental determination for IPD No. 2019-01 and CUP No. 2020-02 and, furthermore, that Modification No.1 is exempt from environmental review pursuant to Section 15301 (Class 1: Existing Facilities) of the California Environmental Quality Act because the request is limited to the undergrounding of publicly-owned utilities and the addition of skylights to a previously- approved development. Therefore, no further environmental documentation is required. FISCAL IMPACT There are no fiscal impacts associated with this request. COUNCIL GOAL COMPLIANCE This action does not support a current strategic directive. 8 Honorable City Council 06/16/2021 Regular Meeting Page 9 STAFF RECOMMENDATION (ROLL CALL VOTE REQUIRED) 1. Open the public hearing, accept public testimony and close the public hearing; and 2. Adopt Resolution No. 2021-____ approving Modification No. 1 to IPD No. 2019-01 and CUP No. 2020-02, subject to the conditions of approval contained therein, and allowing one utility pole to be relocated on-site and two poles to be placed underground and allowing skylights on the rooftop of the previously-approved development. Attachment 1: Location Map Attachment 2: Aerial Map Attachment 3: Approved Site Plan: 5850 Condor Drive Attachment 4: Resolution No. 2020-3935, Approving IPD No. 2019-01 and CUP No. 2020-02 Attachment 5: City Council Staff Report, dated July 15, 2020 Attachment 6: Request from Mr. Paul Minoo, dated May 21, 2021 Attachment 7: Proposed “Undergrounding of Utilities” Site Plan: 5850 Condor Drive Attachment 8: Proposed “Skylights” Roof Plan: 5850 Condor Drive Attachment 9: Draft Resolution No. 2021-____ with Special Conditions of Approval 9 Location Map ATTACHMENT 1 1"=182ft t lg j~ :E -1 1 \ Virginia Colony Park \ ..!,.~ Mod 1 to IPD 2019-01 and CUP 2020-02 Virgini~ ColonyPS(k I I ($- # ;J I/ / / / / 03/26/2021 • I ( This map may re~resents a vi sual display of related geograph ic information. Data provid ed here on is not g uarantee of acutual field conditions. To be sure of compl ete accuracy, pl ease contact the responsibl e staf for most up-to-date information. ~ 10 Aerial Map ATTACHMENT 2 1"=182ft Mod 1 to IPD 2019-01 and CUP 2020-02 03/26/2021 • I ( This map may re~resents a vi sual display of related geograph ic information. Data provid ed here on is not g uarant ee of acutual field conditions. To be sure of compl ete accuracy, pl ease contact the responsibl e staf for most up-to-date informati on . 11 ATTACHMENT 3 .. .. ~ JO IN (N ) S IDEWALK TO (E ) SIDEW ALK (LOCATI O N APPX.) SEE CIVIL P LANS 2 2 w 0 2 ir Q DISABLED PATH OF TRAVEL FROM PROJECT BOUNDARY · · SEE CIVIL PLANS I : ; : r 1·· l--_-1-,· 0 AREAS AND COVERAGES ARE PRELIMINARY AND SUBJECT TO CHANGE UPON RE V IEW 0 0 ONE STORY CONCRETE TILT UP INDUSTRIAL BUILDING 48 ,787 S.F. / 116 STA LL S (2.38/1000) 38'-0" TOP OF PARAP ET/ 30'-0" CLE AR INTERIOR ORIVE." (" 0 0 TRAS H ENCLOS URE s·--0· ""VERIFY DIMENSION W ITH VENDOR ~~iv~~~~(1?~~~~~,g;~~~~u· FOR SITE BY: C YCLESAFE OREO. (616) 95 4-9977 BI CYC LE RACK PR OJEC T SUMMARY S ITE ADDRESS 5850 CONDOR DRIVE, MOORPARK, CA. 90321 LEGAL DESCRIPTIO N LOTS 17,18AND 31 O F TRACT N O . 3492. BOOK 95, PAGE 30 OF MAPS IN THE OFFICE OF COUNTY RE CORDER. ST ATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES A.P.N . A.P.N. A.P.N . SITE AREA ZONE: CODE : TYPE: OCCUPA NCY: BUILDIN G AREA PARKING REQUIRED INDUSTRIAL (211000) PARKING PROVIDED STANDARD DISABLED MOTORCYCL E TOTAL PARKING PROVIDED BICYCLE PARKING INTERIOR (LONG TERM) EXTERIOR (SHORT TERM) F.A.R. COVERAGES BUILDING (f .P. / S ITE) PAVING LANDSCAPING HARDSCAPE KEYNOTE sn 513-060-175LOT 17 5 13-060.185 LOT 18 5 13-060.315 LOT 31 150,948.91 S .F . (3.465AC) M-1 2019 CBC.CFC , C M C , CPC, CEC, CAL GREEN Ill - B - FULLY SPRINKLERED S-1 , F A N D ACCESSORY B 48,787 SF 97 STALLS 107 STALLS 5STALLS ~ 116 STALLS (2.38/1000) ( 7 ) REC'D. / ( 7 ) PROVO. ( 7 ) REC'D. / ( 8 ) PROVO. 48,787 SF ::: .32 /1 48,787 SF:: 32.3202 % 62,067 SF :: 41 .1179% 37 ,060 SF " 24.5513 % 3,035 SF " 2.0106 % 1. LANDSCAPING WllH 6 " HI GH MACHINE FORMED CON CRElE CURB AND AUTOMATIC IRRIGATI ON CONNEC TEO TO CENTRAL TIMER. TYP. 2. SEALEOA..C. PAVING OVER BASE MATERIAL PER GEOTECHNICAL REPORT , TYP. 3. RECESSED TRUCK LOADING RAMP WITH 6" ltUCK CONCRETE TILT UP RETAINING WALLS 10 t.\AlCH BLDG AND6" THICK REINFORCEO CONCRETE SI.AB WITH BROOM ,'"INISH MD EXP JOINTS-SEE SOILS REPORT ,:_ NEW REINFORCED CONCRETE APRON & CURB CUT AND PER CITY OF MOORPARK STANDARD S. 3"-6" HIGH NATURAL CONCRETE GUARDWALL AT E~'lRY ST AIRS I 01SABLED ACCES RAMP -CLEAR.SEALED FINISH. TYP. -SEE EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS 6. 24" X 24" SCORED & COLORED CONCRETE DRIVE APRON PER SOILS REPO RT RECOMMENDATION WITH CONCRETE RIBBON -DAVIS COLOR 61222 "EASTERN lAN OR EQUAL 7. 9'-0"" X 18"-0" STANDARD PARKING STALL wrrn 2"-0" OVERHANG AND PAINTED STRIPES. TY? -SEE DETAIL 8. 5"-0" X 10'-0" tl.OTORCYCLE STALL WITH 6" l'HICK CO NC. SLAB ANOPAINlEO ST RI PES. TYP . -SEE OE TAIL 9 . 9 '-0"" X 18'-0" HANDICAPPED PARKI NG STALL WITH s· \'VIOE LOADING AREA ( 8" WlOE @ VAN ACCESS.) PROVIDE SIGNAGE AND PAINTED STRIPES, lYP -PER TITlE 2<1 10. 4'-0-WIDE (MIN.) X ~" THICK REINF ORCED CONC. WALK WITH BROOM FINISH A NO SAW CUT CONTROL JOINTS AT 4 '-0" 0 .C . TYP -PROVIDE TRUN CATED W ARNING DEV ICES AS REOUIREO 11. 4'-0" X 9'-0" TREE WELL WJTH 6" CONCRETE CURB ANO AUTO MATIC IRRIGATIO N, TYP. 12 , 10' X 12' DOCK HIGH OVERHEAD lRUCK DOOR, IYP. 13. 12' X u · GRADE L EVEL OVERMEAO TRUCK DOOR , TYP 14 . 3· X 7' E.X ll 11.IAN D OOR , TYP 1S. 3"-0" WIDE METAL CANOPY (OPEN)WIT H S.S. SCREEN, TYP.-PAINTED FASCIA I FRA \UNG 16. DISABLED PA Tit OF TRAVEL TO MAIN ENTRY. TYP. 17. 6" THICK REINFORCED CONCRETE lRUCK II.ANUEVERING AREA PER SOILS REPORT RECO'-'MENDA110N 18. 9"-0" HIGH CONC. llL 1 UP SCREE N WALL AND TRASH ENCLOSURE WITH Sot.ID METAL GATES AND SOLID COVER PTO 10 II.A TCH BUILOING. SANDBLAST WALLS (BOTH SIDES)-SEE DETAIL 19. CONCRETE TRAfl SFORMER PAO WITH NEW PIPE GUARDS AS REOUIREO • see ELECTRICAi. PLANS ,,-20. 3"-6" HIGH NATURAL CONCRETE GUARDWAU AT ENTRY STAIRS /DISABLEOACCESS RAJJP WI CLEAR.SEALED FINISH , TYP , 2 \. PNUEl.'A TICALL Y PLACED REINFORCED GUNITE RETAINING WALL (HEIGHT VARIES) WITH SCORED "STONE" APPEARANCE EARTHTONE Cot.ORS -see ENGINEERS PLANS 22 . 12"(1,'J)X50"(L)X 14 ' (HJ TRUCK LOADING ZOW: PER CITY STANDARD, TYP.(2) 23 . NEW BICYCL E RACKS BY CVCLESAFE OR ea . ON REl/·-l FORCED case. PAO, TYP. -SEE OE T AIL BELOW 24 . PROVIDE NEW CONCRETE SIDEWALK PE R CITY STA.N OA.RO PLATE JOIN 10 EXISTING SIDEWALi( AS OCCURS -SEE CML PLANS 25. 3·.o· w10E M::TAL CANOPY WlT H SOLID ROOf , TYP.-PAINTED 26. CAR /VAN POOL CLEAN AIR PARKING STALL S, TYP. OF (11 1 • PLACES. IN THE PAINT USED FOR PARl(ING STALL STRIPING. SUCH TtlAT ntE LOWER EDGE OF ntE LAST WORD ALIGN S WllH lHE END OF TH E STAI..L STRIPING BENEATH PARKED VEHI CLE 21 . (7)-MlJ.BE ELECTRIC VEIUCLE PARKING STALLS. PROVIDE CONDUIT AN O WIRING FOR E.l.lilJ.Bi:. SINGLE CHARGING UNIT FOR EACH SlALL A TOTAL OF (I B) ELECTRIC (FUTURE! ANO /OR CLEAN AIR PARKING STALLS PROVIOEO. PAINI , IN THE PAINT USED FOR PARKING SlALL STRIPING, SUCH THAT THE LOWER EDGE Of THE LAST WORD ALIGNS WITH THE ENO Or THE SlALL STRIPING BENEATH PARKED VEHICLE s·-o· EAC H M O TO R CYCLE rESr~, MOTORCYCLE 9·.0 - SEE SITE PLAN) -4-WIDE P TO. S TRI PE, TYP. T O MATCH CITY PARKING ST AN OARD FIELD VERIFY PRIOR T O PAINTING 1----t+-4· wmE PTO. STR IPE , TYP. TO MATCH C ITY PARKING STANDARD FIELD VE R IFY PRIOR TO PAINTING r 2•--0· {OVERH ANG) L ____ _ STANDARD TYPI CA L PARKIN G STALLS t J I l VICIN IT Y MAP N.T.S. lfl-Wl'ltr~1• tfark.,-;;::.=o o Q 1n1[Q~1, l I 9 ,.._,~fMKlNnSH,,c" -·· , i ',PR OJECT LOCATIOI\{ I SITE PLAN SC-1·"' 20·-0· A s sociate s 376 N . Sterling Center Drive Wes~oke Village, CA 91361 Phone 818 . 706. 3997 Fox 818 . 706. 2453 Erwin Grigorian, P.E . C033057 .,'°"" .. .,._ ... "'._.._._..., --• ... ..,.,.......,... ....... - Revisions NEW INDUSTRIAL BUILDING FOR 4M IN VES TMENT CORPO RATI ON 5850 CONDOR DRIVE MOORPARK , CALIF. SITEPL.A N Oa:e F EB . 2020 20 18 .12 Drav.T1by St111et A-1 12 RESOLUTION NO. 2020-3935 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK, APPROVING INDUSTRIAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 2019-01 AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2020-02 FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF A 48,787 SQUARE-FOOT, SINGLE-STORY INDUSTRIAL BUILDING AND ASSOCIATED SITE IMPROVEMENTS ON AN UNDEVELOPED 3.46-ACRE SITE AT 5850 CONDOR DRIVE, AND MAKING A DETERMINATION OF EXEMPTION UNDER CEQA IN CONNECTION THEREWITH, AND DENYING THE REQUEST TO FUND COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE UNDERGROUNDING OF UTILITIES, ON THE APPLICATION OF PAUL MINOO FOR 4M INVESTMENT CORPORATION WHEREAS, on November 13, 2019, an application was filed for Industrial Planned Development (IPD) Permit No. 2019-01 and Conditional Use Permit (CUP) No. 2020-02 for the development of a 48,787 square-foot, single-story industrial building and associated site improvement on an undeveloped 3.46-acre site at 5850 Condor Drive; and submitted a funding request to the City of $469,398.00 for costs associated with the undergrounding of utilities pursuant to the Southern California Edison Rule 20b scenario; and WHEREAS, on June 2, 2020, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 2020-650, recommending to the City Council conditional approval of Industrial Planned Development No. 2019-01 and Conditional Use Permit No. 2020-02, with no consideration of the funding request; and WHEREAS, at a duly noticed public hearing on July 15, 2020, the City Council considered the agenda report for Industrial Planned Development No. 2019-01 and Conditional Use Permit No. 2020-02 and any supplements thereto and written public comments; opened the public hearing and took and consider ed public testimony both for and against the proposal; and reached a decision on this matter; and WHEREAS, the Community Development Department has determined that IPD No. 2019-01 and CUP No. 2020-02 is categorically exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 15332 (Class 32: In­ Fill Development Projects) of the CEQA Guidelines. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTATION: The City Council, based on its own independent analysis and judgment, concurs with the Community Development Director's determination that the project is categorically exempt from the requirements of CEQA pursuant to Section 15332 (Class 32: In-Fill Development Projects) of the CEQA Guidelines. The proposed building is consistent with the General Plan and Zoning regulations. In addition, there is no substantial evidence that the ATTACHMENT 4 13 Resolution No. 2020-3935 Page 2 project will have a significant effect on the environment in that the site will be developed with associated site improvements. No further environmental documentation is needed. SECTION 2. PLANNED DEVELOPMENT FINDINGS: Based upon the information set forth in the staff report(s), accompanying studies, and oral and written public testimony, the City Council makes the following findings in accordance with City of Moorpark, Municipal Code Section 17.44.040: 1.The site design, including structure location, size, height, setbacks, massing, scale, architectural style and colors, and landscaping, is consistent with the goals and policies of the City's General Plan and Zoning Ordinance, as described in the staff report and attachments thereto in that the building design features a contemporary industrial architecture that includes concrete tilt-up panels with rectangular tinted clerestory windows and roll-up truck doors. The scale of the building is compatible with the surrounding business campus directly adjacent to the project site. 2.The site design would not create negative impacts on or impair the utility of properties, structures or uses in the surrounding area in that the building height of 41-feet and 6-inches is generally consistent with the height of the existing industrial buildings in the vicinity. In addition, the building is below the grade level of the adjacent lot. 3.The proposed use is compatible with existing and permitted uses in the surrounding area in that suitable uses, such as, light industrial services, technical research and business office would be permitted under the Industrial Park (M-1) Zoning designation. SECTION 3. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FINDINGS: Based upon the information set forth in the staff report(s), accompanying studies, and oral and written public testimony, the City Council makes the following findings in accordance with City of Moorpark, Municipal Code Section 17.44.040: 1.The proposed use is consistent with the provisions of the General Plan, zoning ordinance, and other applicable regulations; in that Table 17.24.031 of the City Code allows a maximum building height of 60-feet within the Industrial Park (M-1) zone with an approved CUP. 2.The proposed use is compatible with both existing and permitted land uses in the surrounding area, in that the proposed building height of 41-feet and 6-inches is common in the existing business campus. The proposed use is compatible with the scale, visual character, and design of surrounding properties, in that the proposed building height is appropriate for the architecture of the building and consistent with the adjacent industrial buildings. 14 Resolution No. 2020-3935 Page 3 3.The proposed use would not be obnoxious or harmful, or impair the utility of neighboring property or uses, in that the proposed building is below the grade level from the adjacent lot; therefore, the visual impact of the proposed building is minor and would not present any impacts on adjoining uses. 4.The proposed use would not be detrimental to the public health, safety, convenience, or welfare, in that the project is substantially consistent with existing industrial development in the vicinity, includes sufficient loading and on­ site parking facilities, and will be designed to comply with all applicable codes and regulations. SECTION 4. CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL: The City Council approves Industrial Planned Development No. 2019-01 and Conditional Use Permit No. 2020-02, subject to the Standard and Special Conditions of Approval included in Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. SECTION 5. CITY COUNCIL DENIAL: The City Council denies the Applicant's funding request of $469,398.00 for costs associated with the undergrounding of utilities pursuant to the Southern California Edison Rule 20b scenario. SECTION 6. CERTIFICATE OF ADOPTION: the City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this resolution and shall cause a certified resolution to be filed in the book or original resolutions. PASSED, AND ADOPTED this 15th day of July, 2020. ATTEST: Planned 15 Resolution No. 2020-3935 Page 4 EXHIBIT A STANDARD AND SPECIAL CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR INDUSTRIAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 2019-01 AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2020-02 STANDARD CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL The applicant shall comply with Standard Conditions of Approval for Subdivisions and Planned Developments as adopted by City Council Resolution No. 2009-2799 (Exhibit A), except as modified by the following Special Conditions of Approval. In the event of conflict between a Standard and Special Condition of Approval, the Special Condition shall apply. SPECIAL CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 1.The applicant's acceptance of this permit and/or commencement of construction and/or operations under this permit is deemed to be acceptance of all conditions of this permit. 2.The Conditions of Approval of this permit, City of Moorpark Municipal Code and adopted city policies at the time of the permit approval supersede all conflicting notations, specifications, dimensions, typical sections and the like which may be shown on plans. 3.Industrial Planned Development No. 2019-01 and Conditional Use Permit No. 2020-02 expire one (1) year from the date of its approval unless the use has been inaugurated by issuance of a building permit for construction. The Community Development Director may, at his/her discretion, grant up to two (2) additional one-year extensions for use inauguration of the development permit, if there have been no changes in the adjacent areas and if the applicant can document that he/she has diligently worked towards use inauguration during the initial period of time. The request for extension of this planned development permit must be made in writing, at least thirty (30) days prior to the expiration date of the permit and must be accompanied by applicable entitlement processing deposits. 4.Conditions of this entitlement may not be interpreted as permitting or requiring any violation of law or any unlawful rules or regulations or orders of an authorized governmental agency. 5.The applicant shall defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City and its agents, officers and employees from any claim, action or proceeding against the City or its agents, officers or employees to attack, set aside, void, or annul any approval by the City or any of its agencies, departments, commissions, agents, officers, or 16 Resolution No. 2020-3935 Page 5 employees concerning the permit, which claim, action or proceeding is brought within the time period provided by the California Code of Civil Procedure Section 1094.6 and Government Code Section 65009. The City will promptly notify the applicant of any such claim, action or proceeding, and if the City should fail to do so or should fail to cooperate fully in the defense, the applicant shall not thereafter be responsible to defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City or its agents, officers and employees pursuant to this condition. a.The City may, within its unlimited discretion, participate in the defense of any such claim, action or proceeding, if both of the following occur: i.The City bears its own attorney fees and costs; and ii.The City defends the claim, action or proceeding in good faith. b.The applicant shall not be required to pay or perform any settlement of such claim, action or proceeding unless the settlement is approved by the applicant. The applicant's obligations under this condition shall apply regardless of whether a building permit is ultimately obtained, or final occupancy is ultimately granted with respect to the permit. 6.If any of the conditions or limitations of this approval are held to be invalid, that holding shall not invalidate any of the remaining conditions or limitations set forth. 7.The development must be in substantial conformance with the plans presented in conjunction with the application for Industrial Planned Development No. 2019-01 and Conditional Use Permit No. 2020-02, except any modifications as may be required to meet spe cific Code standards or other conditions stipulated herein. Any future changes to the parking layout shall require review and approval as determined by the Community Development Director consistent with Chapter 17.44 of the Zoning Ordinance. 8.Industrial Planned Development No. 2019-01 and Conditional Use Permit No. 2020-02 are granted or approved with the City's designated approving body retaining and reserving the right and jurisdiction to review and to modify the permit-including the conditions of approval-based on changed circumstances. Changed circumstances include, but are not limited to, major modification of the business; a change in scope, emphasis, size, or nature of the business; the expansion, alteration, reconfiguration, or change of use; or the fact that the use is negatively impacting surrounding uses by virtue of impacts not identified at the time of application for the conditional use permit or impacts that are much greater than anticipated or disclosed at the time of application for the conditional use permit. The reservation of right to review any permit granted or approved under this chapter by the City's designated approving body is in addition to, and not in lieu of, the right of the City, its Planning Commission, City Council and designated approving body to review and revoke or modify any permit granted or 17 Resolution No. 2020-3935 Page 6 approved under this chapter for any violations of the conditions imposed on such permit. 9.Prior to issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall submit a lighting and landscaping plan for review and approval by the Community Development Director, Parks and Recreation Director, and Police Chief that demonstrates compliance with the City's Zoning Ordinance, Landscape Standards and Guidelines, and Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance, and provides a safe and secure environment for the building occupants. 10.Prior to the issuance of a Zoning Clearance for occupancy, the applicant shall submit a Developer Waste Reduction and Recycling Plan to the satisfaction of the Program Manager. 11.All necessary permits must be obtained from the Building and Safety Division and all construction shall be in compliance with the Moorpark Building Code and all other applicable regulations. 12.Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall provide a sample of the glass to be used, along with the manufacturer's specifications for exterior reflectance, for review and approval by the Community Development Director. 13.Prior to the issuance of a building permit, a Lot Merger application for Assessor Parcel Nos.: 513-0-060-175, 513-0-060-185, and 513-0-060-315 must be completed and recorded. 14.Parking areas must be developed and maintained in compliance with the Moorpark Municipal Code, and surfaced with asphalt, concrete, or other surface acceptable to the Community Development Director, City Engineer/Public Works Director, and must include adequate provisions for drainage, National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) compliance, striping and appropriate wheel blocks or curbs in parking areas adjacent to landscaped areas. All parking space striping must be maintained to be clearly visible during the life of the development. 15.A separate sign permit application is required for all proposed signs, which are subject to the review and approval of the Community Development Director. 16.Prior to issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall submit all fees, including, but not limited to Los Angeles Avenue Area of Contribution Fee, Air Quality Fee, Tree and Landscape Fee, Fire Protection Facilities Fee, Police Facilities Fee, and Library Facilities Fee. All entitlement processing fees must be paid in full prior to the issuance of a building permit. 18 Resolution No. 2020-3935 Page 7 17.Prior to issuance of a building permit, applicant shall either submit an in-lieu art fee or indicate a location for on-site public art in compliance with Chapter 17.50 of the Zoning Ordinance. If on-site public art is approved, it must be installed and completed prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. 18.Prior to issuance of building permits, Developer shall revise the proposed west elevation (along Princeton Avenue) to provide additional architectural enhancements, subject to the approval of the Community Development Director. 19.Prior to issuance of grading and building permits, Developer shall revise plans to provide fiber cabling, underground conduit, and other appropriate equipment with the latest technology available to ensure that all structures intended for human occupancy are prepared to connect to broadband high-speed internet and communication services. Engineering / Public Works 20.Prior to issuance of a grading permit, provide street improvement plans, including all profiles, for Princeton Avenue and Condor Drive. Street improvement plans shall include all improvements within the existing and proposed right-of-way (curb and gutter, sidewalk, parkways, driveways, etc.). 21.Provide site improvement plans, including grading and drainage, site utilities, storm drainage infrastructure, sewer, domestic water, irrigation water, fire water, etc. 22.Provide a Hydrology and Hydraulic Report, prepared by a State of California Licensed Civil Engineer. Peak storm water runoff mitigation shall comply with Ventura County Design Hydrology Manual and no developed peak condition shall exceed the 10-year developed condition. 23.Provide a revised Storm Water Quality Report, prepared by a State of California Licensed Civil Engineer. Report formatting shall follow the County's Technical Guidance Manual for Storm Water Quality Measures. 24.All proposed storm water quality BMPs shall comply with the most current MS4 permit. 25.Provide Storm Water Quality Operations and Maintenance Manual and Covenant. 26.Provide street dedication and/or easement documents for consideration to the satisfaction of the City Engineer/Public Works Director. 27.Provide water and sewer improvement plans for reference. 19 Resolution No. 2020-3935 Page 8 28.Applicant shall install "full-capture" trash exc luders approved by the California State Water Resources Control Board for compliance with the State's Trash Policy (State Water Resources Control Board Resolution No. 2015-0019) in all storm drains. Flow capacity calculations showing compliance with the 1-year, 1- hour minimum flow design criteria and applicable bypass sizing shall be identified on Plans and submitted to the City Engineer for review and approval prior to installation. An ongoing Operations and Maintenance Plan shall also be submitted to the City Engineer for review. 29.Project will provide street and frontage improvements along Princeton Avenue. Such frontage improvements include replacing an existing transiUbus shelter with a new one, to the satisfaction of the City's Transit Program Manager. Additionally, the street improvements along Princeton Avenue shall include a bus turnout for the new transiUbus shelter, per Ventura County Road Standards. Ventura County Fire Protection District (VCFPD) 30.Access Road Width, Private Roads/Driveways -Private roads shall comply with Public Road Standards. 31. Construction Access -Prior to combustible construction, a paved all-weather access road / driveway suitable for use by a 20 ton Fire District vehicle shall be installed at locations approved by the Fire District. 32.Construction Access Utilities -Prior to combustible construction, all utilities located within the access road and the first lift of the access road pavement shall be installed. A minimum 20 foot clear width shall remain free of obstruction during any construction activities within the development once combustible construction starts. 33.Access Road Location -The access / driveway shall be extended to within 150 feet of all portions of the exterior walls of the first story of any building and shall be in accordance with Fire District access standards. Where the access roadway cannot be provided, approved fire protection system or systems shall be installed as required and acceptable to the Fire District. 34.Fire Lanes -Prior to construction, the applicant shall submit two (2) site plans to the Fire District for approval of the location of fire lanes. Prior to occupancy, all fire lanes shall be posted "NO PARKING-FIRE LANE-TOW AWAY" in accordance with California Vehicle Code, the International Fire Code and current VCFPD Fire Lane Standards. All signs and or Fire Lane markings shall be within recorded access easements. 35.Fire Hydrant Installation -Prior to combustible construction on any parcel, a fire hydrant capable of providing the required fire flow and duration shall be installed and in service along the access road I driveway at a location approved by the • 20 Resolution No. 2020-3935 Page 9 Fire District, but no further than 250 feet from the building site. The owner of the combustible construction is responsible for the cost of this installation. 36.Fire Department Clearance -Applicant shall obtain VCFPD Form #126 "Requirements for Construction" prior to obtaining a building permit for any new structures or additions to existing structures. Ventura County Air Pollution Control District (VCAPCD) 37.The Permittee shall comply with the provisions of all applicable Californi a State Laws and Air Pollution Control District Rules and Regulations regarding portable construction equipment and construction vehicles. 38.The Permittee shall comply with the provisions of applicable VCAPCD Rules and Regulations, which include but are not limited to, Rule 50 (Opacity), Rule 51 (Nuisance), and Rule 55 (Fugitive Dust). 39.Operations shall be operated in accordance with the Rules and Regulations of the Ventura County Air Pollution Control District, with emphasis on Rule 51, Nuis ance. -End- 21 Resolution No. 2020-3935 Page 10 STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF VENTURA CITY OF MOORPARK ss. I, Ky Spangler, City Clerk of the City of Moorpark, California, do hereby certify under penalty of perjury that the foregoing Resolution No. 2020-3935 was adopted by the City Council of the City of Moorpark at a regular meeting held on the 15th day of July 2020, and that the same was adopted by the following vote: A YES: Council members Enegren, Mikos, Pollock, Simons, and Mayor Parvin NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None WITNESS my hand and the official seal of said City this 15th day of July, 2020. (seal) KySp~ 22 Item: 8.B. MOORPARK CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT TO: Honorable City Council FROM: Karen Vaughn, Community Development Director BY: Freddy A. Carrillo, Associate Planner ll DATE: 07/15/2020 Regular Meeting SUBJECT: Consider a Resolution Approving Industrial Planned Development No. 2019-01 and Conditional Use Permit No. 2020-02 for the Development of a 48,787 Square-Foot, Single-Story Industrial Building and Associated Site Improvements on an Undeveloped 3.46- Acre Site at 5850 Condor Drive and Making a Determination of Exemption Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act in Connection Therewith, and Consideration of Cost Sharing Alternatives for Undergrounding of Utilities, on the Application of Paul Minoo (4M Investment Corporation) PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND BACKGROUND On November 13, 2019, Paul Minoo (for 4M Investment Corporation) filed an application for an Industrial Planned Development (IPD) to develop a 48,787 square-foot, single- story industrial building and associated site improvements on an undeveloped 3.46-acre site at 5850 Condor Drive. A potential tenant for the building has not been identified. The request also includes a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) to allow the proposed building height of 41 feet and 6 inches, an 11-foot and 6-inch increase above the maximum height permitted within the Industrial Park (M-1) zone. Additional height may be permitted with an approved CUP, pursuant to City Code Section 17.24.035. An IPD is required for new industrial developments exceeding 2,500 square feet of floor area. As noted above, the Applicant is requesting to develop a 48,787 square-foot building. Approval of the IPD requires that the design of the proposed project complies with the provisions of the General Plan and Zoning Code, and is compatible with adjacent properties. In addition, building height, setbacks, sizes, locations, architectural styles and colors of all proposed buildings, structures and other on-site improvements, landscaping design, neighborhood design, and permitted land uses are established as part of the IPD review and approval. A CUP is required to deviate from the maximum 23 Honorable City Council 07/15/2020 Regular Meeting Page 2 height permitted within the M-1 zone. The maximum height in the M-1 zone is 30 feet, however, City Code allows the Applicant to propose a maximum height of 60 feet, subject to approval of a CUP. An analysis of the proposed height is provided in the Setbacks and Height section below. The Applicant has also submitted a request to have the City participate in the cost of undergrounding of overhead utilities. This is discussed further in the Undergrounding of Utilities section. Previous Applications: On October 6, 1999, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 1999-1658 approving Industrial Planned Development Nos. 99-01 and 99-02 for the construction of two industrial/warehouse buildings on contiguous lots located on the subject property. Building permits for the IPD and CUP were never obtained. Subsequently, these permits expired. On April 4, 2001, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2001-1829 to vacate a 0.22- acre portion of Princeton Avenue (formerly Los Angeles Avenue) right-of-way, at the southeast corner of Condor Drive and Princeton Avenue, immediately adjacent to the project site. DISCUSSIONS AND ANALYSIS Existing Conditions: The 3.46-acre project site is located on the southeast corner of Princeton Avenue and Condor Drive (see Attachment 2 - Aerial Map). Surrounding land uses are primarily industrial buildings, a single-family dwelling, community park and school. The site consists of two undeveloped lots and a corner lot that was previously public right-of-way and covered with asphalt adjacent to Princeton Avenue. This lot was vacated by the City Council on April 4, 2001, as part of the conditions of approval for Industrial Planned Development Nos. 99-01 and 99-02 to realign the intersection of Princeton Avenue (formerly known as Los Angeles Avenue) and Condor Drive. A condition of approval requires the Applicant to record a lot merger to consolidate the development to one property, prior to issuance of building permits. The following table identifies the General Plan, zoning, and existing land uses for each lot and the vicinity: Location General Plan Zoning Existing Land Use Project Site* Light Industrial (I-1) and Freeway / Right-of- Way (Frwy-R/W) Industrial Park (M-1) Vacant lots and paved section adjacent to Princeton Avenue North Light Industrial (l-1) Industrial Park (M-1) Office Building 24 Honorable City Council 07/15/2020 Regular Meeting Page 3 South School (S), Park (P), and Medium Density Residential (4DU/AC) Industrial Park (M-1), Rural Exclusive (RE-1AC), and Single- Family Residential (R-1-6) School, Community Park, and Detached Single -Family Homes East Light Industrial (l-1) Industrial Park (M-1) Light Industrial Building West Light Industrial (l-1) Industrial Park (M-1) Light Industrial Building *The project site consists of Assessor Parcel Nos. 513-0-060-315, 513-0-060-185, and 513-0-060-175 General Plan Consistency: The General Plan land use designation for the project site is Light Industrial (l-1) on two existing lots and Freeway/Right-of-Way (Frwy-R/W) on the previously vacated corner parcel. The purpose and intent of the l-1 designation is to provide for a variety of industrial uses within the City. Suitable uses include light industrial service, technical research and business office use in a business park context. The Frwy-R/W designation identifies the existing right-of-way and portions of future right-of-way for the SR-118 and SR-23 freeways. As mentioned above, the City Council vacated the 0.22- acre parcel to realign the intersection of Princeton Avenue and Condor Drive. At that time, the Council determined the parcel was consistent with the General Plan Circulation Element. The current application proposes paving and landscaping improvements to this property that are fundamentally consistent with the previous industrial development. In addition, the City is in the process of updating the General Plan where the land use designation will be cleaned up to be consistent with the industrial designation of the adjoining lots. Land Use Element Goals and Policies: • GOAL 10: Encourage a diversity of industrial uses which are located and designed in a compatible manner with surrounding land uses. POLICY 10.1: New Industrial development should be located adjacent to existing industrial uses and along major transportation corridors. Zoning Consistency: The zoning designation of the three subject parcels is Industrial Park (M-1). The purpose of this zone is to provide suitable areas for exclusive development of light industrial, service, technical research and related business office uses in an industrial park context, in conjunction with stringent requirements for building design, noise, landscaping and performance standards. At this time, the Applicant has not identified a potential tenant for the proposed building. Any future uses will be evaluated for consistency with the M-1 zoning requirements on a case-by-case basis as the Applicant 25 Honorable City Council 07/15/2020 Regular Meeting Page 4 is able to identify potential tenants. As designed and with the approval of the CUP for additional building height, the proposed industrial development complies with all applicable requirements of the Zoning Ordinance standards, including building location, size, setbacks, massing scale, architecture style, colors, and landscaping. Setbacks and Height: Table 17.24.035 of the City Code establishes the development standards for properties within the M-1 zone, including lot area, setbacks, height and building coverage. The following table summarizes the maximum building height of the M-1 zoning designation. General Requirements Listed Under Table 17.24.035 M-1 Zone Development Standard Proposed Industrial Planned Development Complies A. Floor area ratio, maximum 0.38 0.32 Yes B. Lot area, minimum 10,000 square-feet 150,948 Square feet Yes C. Front yard setback, minimum 20 feet 101 feet, 7 inches Yes D. Interior side yard setback, minimum 5 feet 34 feet Yes E. Street side yard setback, minimum 5 feet 35 feet Yes F. Rear yard setback, minimum zero 34 feet Yes G. Building and structure height, maximum 30 feet 41-feet, 6-inch Yes, with an approved CUP The proposed height of 41-feet and 6-inches is generally consistent with the height of existing industrial development in the vicinity of the project site, including PennyMac at 47-feet and Laritech, Inc. at 31-feet. In addition, the proposed building is below the grade level of the adjacent lot; therefore, the visual impact of the proposed building is minor and would not present any impacts on adjoining uses. Architecture: The proposed building design features contemporary industrial architecture. Concrete tilt-up panels with rectangular tinted “Clerestory” windows are used throughout to give an industrial appearance to the building and admit light without compromising interior wall space. “Clerestory” windows are generally placed high on a wall plane, above eye level. In addition, metal landscape trellises with crawling vines will be mounted on the walls to break up the massing of the building. Two separate entryways are incorporated into the southern side of building. This provides the property owner the opportunity to lease the building to two tenants and demise the space in the future. Each entrance 26 Honorable City Council 07/15/2020 Regular Meeting Page 5 includes an exterior staircase and accessible ramp, and entrances are highlighted by a weathered metal awning. Two roll-up truck doors at dock height and two roll-up truck doors at grade level are also proposed on the northeastern side of the building, each accented by a weathered metal awning to match the entrance. An Alucobond® panel (similar to brushed aluminum) element extends above the roof line to give the building a unique design and will serve to screen the future air conditioning equipment. The architectural style, massing, and scale of the building are compatible with the surrounding business campus directly adjacent to the project site. Staff has evaluated the proposed architecture and has determined that it is compatible with the existing adjacent industrial buildings. Circulation and Traffic: Access to the site would be provided from two driveways to Condor Drive with one driveway serving passenger traffic and the easterly driveway intended or commercial vehicles and trucks. The truck driveway leads directly into the loading docks on the eastern side of the proposed building. Condor Drive provides one travel lane in each direction. On-street parking is not permitted along the roadway. The posted speed limit is 30 miles per hour (mph). No access will be provided on Princeton Avenue. The Applicant submitted a Focused Traffic Analysis prepared by Ganddini Group, Inc. The purpose of this study is to provide an assessment of traffic operations resulting from development of the proposed project and to identify measures necessary to identify and mitigate any potential significant traffic impacts. The Traffic Analysis modeled existing traffic and proposed traffic volumes, the level of service (LOS) of, the peak hour signal warrant, and queue length analyses at the intersections, and determined that the project would not result in any significant impacts during the AM and PM peak hours at the intersections of Poindexter Avenue at Condor Drive and Avenida Colonia at Condor Drive. The study established that the intersection currently operates at LOS D/F during AM and PM peak periods, which falls below the General Plan standard of LOS C. However, the Study also concludes that the proposed development would not reduce the LOS beyond the existing conditions, and therefore no impacts are presented. A more detailed analysis and the Focused Traffic Analysis are provided in the California Environmental Quality Act Compliance and Exemption Determination (Attachment 5). Parking and Loading Areas: The City Code requires one off-street parking space per 500 square feet of gross floor area for industrial uses, such as manufacturing, assembly, and distribution. As a result, 97 on-site parking spaces would be required to serve the 48,787 square-foot building. The Applicant is proposing 116 spaces located on the south side of the proposed building. These parking spaces include standard, accessible and motorcycle parking. The following table summarizes the project compliance with the parking requirements of the City Code: 27 Honorable City Council 07/15/2020 Regular Meeting Page 6 Building Size Minimum Parking Required Based on Gross Floor Area of Building Total Parking Spaces Required Total Parking Spaces Provided Proposed 48,787 square- foot industrial building 1 space/500 square-feet 97.5 116 *Pursuant to City Code Section 17.32.030, fractional spaces of .5 or less are rounded down to the nearest whole number. The City Code requires two loading spaces for industrial uses (warehouses, storage facilities, manufacturing, etc.) for a new building ranging from 30,001 square feet to 80,000 square feet. The Applicant is proposing four truck-loading spaces for a proposed 47,787 square-foot building along the east side of the proposed building, comprised of two high docks and two on-grade loading spaces. Each loading space provides the required dimensions of 50 feet in length by 12 feet in width, with a turning radius of 45 feet and clear of overhead obstructions. Loading areas must be located in rear or side yard areas outside of required setbacks and must be designed so trucks do not back onto public or private streets or alleys. In addition, loading spaces must be designed to prevent interference with vehicular and pedestrian circulation. The four proposed loading areas do not conflict with traffic or circulation and exceed the number required by the City Code. Grading and Drainage: The project has been designed to provide for all necessary on-site and off-site storm drain improvements including compliance with National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) requirements. Best Management Practices (BMP) Drainage Facilities are also required so that surface water flows are intercepted and treated. The BMP and NPDES improvements will be reviewed by the City Engineer/Public Works Director as part of the condition compliance process prior to issuance of a grading permit. Construction of the project would result in ground surface disturbance during site clearance and grading. Uniformly applied conditions of approval imposed on the Project would require stockpiles, excavation, and exposed soil to be covered with secured tarps, plastic sheeting, erosion control fabrics, or treated with a bio-degradable soil stabilize. Furthermore, the Applicant would be required to obtain a California State Water Resources Control Board Construction General Permit, which requires development of a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP). Landscaping: The Applicant has proposed a landscape plan that includes a variety of trees, shrubs, and groundcover across the property, including the use of perimeter trees and hedges along the west, south, and east property lines. These trees and hedges will screen the parking facilities from view along adjacent public streets. To ensure landscaping is installed properly and consistent with the City’s Landscape Guidelines, a special condition has been added that requires a landscape and irrigation plan to be reviewed and approved by the Parks and Recreation Director and the Community Development 28 Honorable City Council 07/15/2020 Regular Meeting Page 7 Director prior to issuance of a building permit. Undergrounding of Utilities: Three wooden utility poles owned by Southern California Edison (SCE) are currently located on the west side of the site, within the proposed parking area. Standard Condition of Approval No. 145 of Resolution No. 2009-2799 requires that: Prior to issuance of the first building permit, all existing and proposed utilities, including electrical transmission lines less than 67Kv, must be under-grounded consistent with plans approved by the City Engineer, Public Works Director and Community Development Director. Any exceptions must be approved by the City Council. These existing wooden poles are less than 67Kv and therefore would be required to be removed and the utilities placed underground as part of the project. The Applicant is aware of this condition and is willing to underground the on-site poles; however, SCE is requiring the Applicant to underground one additional off-site pole, located on the southeast corner of Condor Drive and Virginia Colony Place. This is necessary because the removal of the three on-site poles would require the Virginia Colony pole to be supported by a new guy wire. There is not sufficient room in the proximity of the pole to safely locate the guy wire, therefore this pole must be undergrounded as well. The four-pole scope of work (three on-site and one off-site) would qualify as a “Rule 20c Project” under the California Public Utilities Commission Undergrounding Program. Rule 20c projects must be funded entirely by the project applicant. The overall costs would include an amount that must be paid to SCE as well as additional work related to the undergrounding that the Applicant’s contractor would complete. The preliminary cost estimate from SCE for this Rule 20c Project is $193,317. In order to receive a final actual cost from SCE, the Applicant would need to pay additional fees to SCE for the design work. The Applicant’s contractor is also responsible to perform some work associated with the undergrounding of utilities. The Applicant provided a cost estimate of $585,000 for this additional work. The total preliminary cost of undergrounding the four utility poles would be approximately $778,317. A final cost estimate has not been generated for this scenario. The Applicant has the option to remove an additional utility pole and guy pole on Princeton Avenue north of the project site in addition to the three on-site poles and off-site pole at Condor Drive and Virginia Colony Place. Expanding the scope of work in this manner would qualify the project as an SCE “Rule 20b Project”. Rule 20b projects qualify for SCE credit and are less expensive to the Applicant. The actual cost from SCE for a proposed five pole scope of work (three on-site and two off-site) Rule 20b Project is $109,398. The Applicant has also indicated that the work performed by the contractor would have the same cost estimate of $585,000. The total cost of undergrounding the five utility poles would be approximately $694,398. 29 Honorable City Council 07/15/2020 Regular Meeting Page 8 In order to receive the SCE credit, the Applicant decided to pursue the expanded Rule 20b scope of work and has submitted a request that the City provide funding of $469,398 for the portion of the work under the Rule 20b scenario and work provided by the Applicant’s contractor (Attachment 4). This includes $34,398 for SCE labor of installing switches, transformers, cables, and removal of existing poles, and $435,000 for the labor that the Applicant is responsible for, including trenching, installing conduits, and purchasing and installing storage equipment. The Applicant is willing to pay $75,000 for the SCE labor and $150,000 for the contracting work. The total cost that the Applicant is willing to pay to pursue Rule 20b is $225,000 (roughly 1/3 of the total cost). A summary of the costs for each scenario and the Applicant’s request is provided below: Rule 20b – Proposed by Applicant (undergrounding of three on-site poles and two off-site poles and one guy pole) Southern California Edison Charges Private Contractor Charges Total $109,398 $585,000 $694,398 Proposed to be Paid by Applicant -$75,000 -$150,000 -$225,000 Requested City Contribution -$34,398 -$435,000 -$469,398 Rule 20c – Not Proposed by Applicant (undergrounding of three on-site poles and one off-site pole) Southern California Edison Costs Private Contractor Costs Total $193,317* $585,000** $778,317 *Preliminary cost estimate **Though this scope of work would be smaller than the Rule 20b scenario, the Applicant has stated that the contractor costs would be the same. Generally, costs associated with the undergrounding of utility poles (on-site and off-site) associated with new development are the responsibility of the developer. The application of the standard conditions of approval, as adopted by the City Council, is uniformly applied to all development projects citywide. The Applicant, however, is requesting that the City fund $469,398 towards this work. The City does not have existing funding sources identified for this purpose. Further, the use of City funds to support private development may trigger prevailing wage considerations and may increase the cost of the labor. For these reasons, staff is recommending that the City Council adopt a resolution approving the IPD and CUP, but denying the request for the City to fund costs associated with the undergrounding of overhead utilities. Should the Council want to consider other options for assisting in the Applicant with the development of this site, staff has identified the following potential alternatives: 30 Honorable City Council 07/15/2020 Regular Meeting Page 9 • Alternative No. 1: Approve the IPD and CUP, and require the Applicant to fund the formation of a Community Facilities District (CFD) in an amount no higher than the cost of undergrounding four poles that include SCE cost and Contractor’s cost based on a Final Estimate provided by SCE. A deposit to the City in the amount of the total cost of $778,317 would be required to begin work on the CFD formation. Should Council elect this alternative, the Council should be aware that formation of a CFD would take 9-12 months to complete and would delay the construction of the project. The Applicant would also be required to pay additional SCE fees to acquire an actual cost estimate for the work. Furthermore, the project parking lot design would need to be modified to work around the location of existing poles. In order to ensure the project meets City Code, a condition of approval would be added for any modifications to the site plan be reviewed by the Community Development Director. • Alternative No. 2: Approve the IPD and CUP, and waive Standard Condition No. 145 (requirement to underground utilities). Should Council elect this alternative, staff suggests that Council identify objective parameters for the basis of the waiver of condition, such as project size (i.e. on a project of 3.5 acres or less), zoning (i.e. projects within industrial zoning districts), or some other objective standard to provide guidance for subsequent developer requests. This alternative would also require changes to the site plan. If this alternative is preferred, a condition of approval would be required so that any modifications to the site plan resulting from the poles remaining on-site would be reviewed by the Community Development Director. Findings Industrial Planned Development Permit Findings In order to approve the Industrial Planned Development Permit, the following findings must be made: 1. The site design, including structure location, size, height, setbacks, massing, scale, architectural style and colors, and landscaping, is consistent with the goals and policies of the City’s General Plan and Zoning Ordinance as described in the staff report an attachments thereto in that the building design features a contemporary industrial architecture that includes concrete tilt-up panels with rectangular tinted clerestory windows and roll-up truck doors. The scale of the building is compatible with the surrounding business campus directly adjacent to the project site. 2. The site design would not create negative impacts on or impair the utility of properties, structures or uses in the surrounding area in that the building height 31 Honorable City Council 07/15/2020 Regular Meeting Page 10 of 41-feet and 6-inches is generally consistent with the height of the existing industrial buildings in the vicinity. In addition, the building is below the grade level of the adjacent lot. 3. The proposed use is compatible with existing and permitted uses in the surrounding area in that suitable uses, such as, light industrial services, technical research and business office would be permitted under the Industrial Park (M-1) Zoning designation. Conditional Use Permit In order to approve the Conditional Use Permit for the additional building height, the following findings must be made: 1. The proposed use is consistent with the provisions of the General Plan, zoning ordinance, and any other applicable regulations; in that Table 17.24.031 of the City Code allows a maximum building height of 60-feet within the Industrial Park (M-1) zone with an approved CUP. 2. The proposed use is compatible with both existing and permitted land uses in the surrounding area, in that the proposed building height of 41-feet and 6-inches is common in the existing business campus. 3. The proposed use is compatible with the scale, visual character, and design of surrounding properties, in that the proposed building height is appropriate for the architecture of the building and consistent with adjacent industrial buildings. 4. The proposed use would not be obnoxious or harmful, or impair the utility of neighboring property or uses, in that the proposed building is below the grade level of the adjacent lot; therefore, the visual impact of the proposed building is minor and would not present any impacts on adjoining uses. 5. The proposed use would not be detrimental to the public health, safety, convenience, or welfare, in that the project is substantially consistent with existing industrial development in the vicinity, includes sufficient loading and on- site parking facilities, and will be designed to comply with all applicable codes and regulations. NOTICING Public Notice for this meeting was given consistent with Chapter 17.44.070 of the Zoning Ordinance as follows: 1. Publication. The notice of the public hearing was published in the Ventura County Star on July 5, 2020. 32 Honorable City Council 07/15/2020 Regular Meeting Page 11 2. Mailing. The notice of the public hearing was mailed on July 3, 2020, to owners of real property, as identified on the latest adjusted Ventura County Tax Assessor Roles, within one-thousand (1,000) feet of the exterior boundaries of the assessor’s parcel(s) subject to the hearing. 3. Sign. Two 32 square-foot signs were placed on the street frontage on July 3, 2020. PROCESSING TIME LIMITS Time limits have been established for the processing of development projects under the Permit Streamlining Act (Government Code Title 7, Division 1, Chapter 4.5), the Subdivision Map Act (Government Code Title 7, Division 2), and the California Environmental Quality Act Statutes and Guidelines (Public Resources Code Division 13, and California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Chapter 3). Under the applicable provisions of these regulations, the following timelines have been established for action on this project: ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION In accordance with the City’s environmental review procedures adopted by resolution, the Community Development Director or designee determines the level of review necessary for a project to comply with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Some projects may be exempt from review based upon a specific category listed in CEQA. Other projects may be exempt under a general rule that environmental review is not necessary where it can be determined that there would be no possibility of significant effect upon the environment. A project which does not qualify for an exemption requires the preparation of an Initial Study to assess the level of potential environmental impacts. Pursuant to Section 15332 (Class 32: In-Fill Development Projects) of the CEQA Guidelines, projects characterized as in-fill development that are substantially surrounded by urban uses are categorically exempt from environmental review. The CEQA Compliance and Exemption Determination (Attachment 5) compares the details of the proposed projects with the requirements to make the determination of the 15332 exemption, including that: (a) The project is consistent with the applicable general plan designation and all applicable general plan policies as well as with applicable zoning designation and regulations; (b) The proposed development occurs within city limits on a project site of no more than five acres substantially surrounded by urban uses; (c) The project site has no value as habitat for endangered, rare, or threatened species; (d) Approval of the project would not result in any significant effects related to traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality; and 33 Honorable City Council 07/15/2020 Regular Meeting Page 12 (e) The site can be adequately served by all required utilities and public services. As outlined in the Determination, the project is consistent Section 15332 of the CEQA Guidelines and no further environmental review is required. PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION On June 2, 2020, the Planning Commission voted 3-0, with Commissioner Di Cecco dissenting, to adopt Resolution No. 2020-650 (Attachment 6) recommending that the City Council conditionally approve Industrial Planned Development No. 2019-01 and Conditional Use Permit No. 2020-02. Because the request for financial assistance for undergrounding of utilities is not within the purview of the Commission, the vote was based purely on the IPD and CUP requests. FISCAL IMPACT Staff costs associated with the processing of the entitlements are reimbursable through the developer deposit account with the City. All landscaping within the project will be maintained by the property owner. STAFF RECOMMENDATION (ROLL CALL VOTE REQUIRED) 1. Open the public hearing, accept public testimony and close the public hearing; and 2. Adopt Resolution No. 2020-____ approving Industrial Planned Development No. 2019-01 and Conditional Use Permit No. 2020-02, subject to the conditions of approval contained therein, and denying the Applicant’s funding request of $469,398 for costs associated with the undergrounding of utilities pursuant to the Southern California Edison Rule 20b scenario. Attachment 1: Location Map Attachment 2: Aerial Map Attachment 3: Project Exhibits A. Site Plan B. Exterior Elevations C. Floor Plan D. Landscape Plan Attachment 4: Request Letter from Mr. Paul Minoo and Southern California Edison and Contractor’s Costs Attachment 5: California Environmental Quality Act Compliance and Exemption Determination, including Focused Traffic Analysis Attachment 6: Planning Commission Resolution No. 2020-650 Attachment 7: Draft Resolution with Conditions of Approval 34 Location Map - 5850 Condor Drive ATTACHMENT 1 ... 1"=376ft Princeton Ave . J Happy Camp CanyOA-. ~ IPD No. 2019-01 12/13/2019 t Virginia Colony Park , ·-$= ' , ll Thisma11i\l':r'f/fcesentm vi suald isplf.)Of re!ated;jeographionfo rmationData provide<flereon is not gua ra nteEDf acutualliel<lconditionsJ obe sureof complet111ccuracypleasecontacllhe respons1 a orm ostup toda tem ormanon. 35 Aerial Map - 5850 Condor Drive ATTACHMENT 2 1"=376ft IPD No . 2019-01 Thisma11mayre!llesentm vi suald isplil)Of re!ated;jeographionformationData provide<flereon is not gua ra nteEDf acutualliel<lcond itionsJ obe sureof comple1111ccuracypleasecontacllhe respons1bl'stamorm ostup toda temtormat1on. 36 E PP C B C B C BC B S C BC B C B C B T D W M ICV ICV WMWM T C BC BC B C B W M W M D S EE S P M S W MW MW M TSPBICV S63 ° 4 0 ' 5 9 " E 80.00'N05°09'49"E321.80'N05°09'49"E155.00'S25°58'58"W20.67'4.00' CON C R ET E DRIVE WAY CONCR E T E DRIVEW A Y CONDORPRINCETONAVENUE DRIVE VIRGINIA COLONYCON D O R DRIVE PLACEPRINCETON AVENUE30'30'6 0'C S S S S T T TSPBWM WM WM WM WM WMWM WM CTVB CB CB CB CB D D PM ICV ICV ICV 25'-0" P.U.E. N52°22'46"E 152.31'L=10 0 .04' R=47 0 .00' L=135 .61'R=470 .00' =16°31' 5 4" N82°06'24"W 124.58' N82°06'24"W 150.00' N81°06'24"E 92 .73' R=270.00'L=64.83'R=35.00'=106°08'04"R=447.00' =23°12'38"L=181.08'3.21' S82°06'24"E N07°54'20"E 210.47'=12°11'44"N3 7 ° 3 7 ' 1 4 "W 2 5 7 . 7 3 ' 1 2 ' X 5 0 ' X 1 4 ' LO A D ING ZO N E 1 2 ' X 5 0 ' X 1 4 ' LO A D ING ZO N E 1 2 ' X 5 0 ' X 1 4 ' LO A D ING ZO N E A A S H TO W B - 4 0 AASHTO WB-409'-0"5'9'-0"HC8'-0"9'-0"HC±5'HC45'-0"5 STD. STALLS @ 9'-0" EA.6'-4"0.5% SLOPE FLOORSITE ADDRESS LEGAL DESCRIPTION A.P.N. A.P.N. A.P.N. SITE AREA ZONE: CODE: TYPE: OCCUPANCY: BUILDING AREA PARKING REQUIRED INDUSTRIAL (2/1000) PARKING PROVIDED STANDARD DISABLED MOTORCYCLE TOTAL PARKING PROVIDED BICYCLE PARKING INTERIOR (LONG TERM) EXTERIOR (SHORT TERM) F.A.R. COVERAGES BUILDING (F.P. / SITE) PAVING LANDSCAPING HARDSCAPE PROJECT SUMMARY 5850 CONDOR DRIVE, MOORPARK, CA. 90321 LOTS 17,18 AND 31 OF TRACT NO. 3492, BOOK 95, PAGE 30 OF MAPS IN THE OFFICE OF COUNTY RECORDER, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES 513-060-175 LOT 17 513-060-185 LOT 18 513-060-315 LOT 31 150,948.91 S.F. (3.465 AC) M-1 2019 CBC,CFC, CMC, CPC, CEC, CAL GREEN lll - B - FULLY SPRINKLERED S-1, F AND ACCESSORY B 48,787 SF 97 STALLS 107 STALLS 5 STALLS 4 STALLS 116 STALLS (2.38/1000) ( 7 ) REQ'D. / ( 7 ) PROV'D. ( 7 ) REQ'D. / ( 8 ) PROV'D. 48,787 SF = .32 / 1 48,787 SF = 32.3202 % 62,067 SF = 41.1179% 37,060 SF = 24.5513 % 3,035 SF = 2.0106 % KEYNOTES 1.LANDSCAPING WITH 6" HIGH MACHINE FORMED CONCRETE CURB AND AUTOMATIC IRRIGATION CONNECTED TO CENTRAL TIMER, TYP. 2.SEALED A.C. PAVING OVER BASE MATERIAL PER GEOTECHNICAL REPORT , TYP. 3.RECESSED TRUCK LOADING RAMP WITH 6" THICK CONCRETE TILT UP RETAINING WALLS TO MATCH BLDG. AND 6" THICK REINFORCED CONCRETE SLAB WITH BROOM FINISH AND EXP. JOINTS - SEE SOILS REPORT 4.NEW REINFORCED CONCRETE APRON & CURB CUT AND PER CITY OF MOORPARK STANDARD 5.3'-6" HIGH NATURAL CONCRETE GUARDWALL AT ENTRY STAIRS / DISABLED ACCES RAMP - CLEARSEALED FINISH, TYP. - SEE EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS 6.24" X 24" SCORED & COLORED CONCRETE DRIVE APRON PER SOILS REPORT RECOMMENDATION WITH CONCRETE RIBBON - DAVIS COLOR 61222 "EASTERN TAN" OR EQUAL. 7.9'-0" X 18'-0" STANDARD PARKING STALL WITH 2'-0" OVERHANG AND PAINTED STRIPES, TYP. - SEE DETAIL 8.5'-0" X 10'-0" MOTORCYCLE STALL WITH 6" THICK CONC. SLAB AND PAINTED STRIPES, TYP. - SEE DETAIL 9.9'-0" X 18'-0" HANDICAPPED PARKING STALL WITH 5' WIDE LOADING AREA ( 8' WIDE @ VAN ACCESS.) PROVIDE SIGNAGE AND PAINTED STRIPES, TYP. - PER TITLE 24 10.4'-0" WIDE (MIN.) X 4" THICK REINFORCED CONC. WALK WITH BROOM FINISH AND SAW CUT CONTROL JOINTS AT 4'-0" O.C., TYP. - PROVIDE TRUNCATED WARNING DEVICES AS REQUIRED. 11.4'-0" X 9'-0" TREE WELL WITH 6" CONCRETE CURB AND AUTOMATIC IRRIGATION, TYP. 12.10' X 12' DOCK HIGH OVERHEAD TRUCK DOOR, TYP. 13.12' X 14' GRADE LEVEL OVERHEAD TRUCK DOOR , TYP. 14.3' X 7' EXIT / MAN DOOR , TYP. 15.3'-0" WIDE METAL CANOPY (OPEN) WITH S.S. SCREEN, TYP.- PAINTED FASCIA / FRAMING 16.DISABLED PATH OF TRAVEL TO MAIN ENTRY, TYP. 17.6" THICK REINFORCED CONCRETE TRUCK MANUEVERING AREA PER SOILS REPORT RECOMMENDATION. 18.9'-0" HIGH CONC. TILT UP SCREEN WALL AND TRASH ENCLOSURE WITH SOLID METAL GATES AND SOLID COVER PTD. TO MATCH BUILDING. SANDBLAST WALLS (BOTH SIDES) - SEE DETAIL 19.CONCRETE TRANSFORMER PAD WITH NEW PIPE GUARDS AS REQUIRED - SEE ELECTRICAL PLANS 20.3'-6" HIGH NATURAL CONCRETE GUARDWALL AT ENTRY STAIRS / DISABLED ACCESS RAMP W/ CLEARSEALED FINISH, TYP. 21.PNUEMATICALLY PLACED REINFORCED GUNITE RETAINING WALL (HEIGHT VARIES) WITH SCORED "STONE" APPEARANCE EARTHTONE COLORS - SEE ENGINEERS PLANS 22.12'(W) X 50'(L) X 14' (H) TRUCK LOADING ZONE PER CITY STANDARD, TYP. (2) 23.NEW BICYCLE RACKS BY CYCLESAFE OR EQ. ON REINFORCED CONC. PAD, TYP. - SEE DETAIL BELOW 24.PROVIDE NEW CONCRETE SIDEWALK PER CITY STANDARD PLATE. JOIN TO EXISTING SIDEWALK AS OCCURS - SEE CIVIL PLANS. 25.3'-0" WIDE METAL CANOPY WITH SOLID ROOF, TYP.- PAINTED 26.CAR / VAN POOL CLEAN AIR PARKING STALLS, TYP. OF (11) - PLACES. IN THE PAINT USED FOR PARKING STALL STRIPING, SUCH THAT THE LOWER EDGE OF THE LAST WORD ALIGNS WITH THE END OF THE STALL STRIPING BENEATH PARKED VEHICLE: 27.(7) - FUTURE ELECTRIC VEHICLE PARKING STALLS. PROVIDE CONDUIT AND WIRING FOR FUTURE SINGLE CHARGING UNIT FOR EACH STALL. A TOTAL OF (18) ELECTRIC (FUTURE) AND / OR CLEAN AIR PARKING STALLS PROVIDED. PAINT, IN THE PAINT USED FOR PARKING STALL STRIPING, SUCH THAT THE LOWER EDGE OF THE LAST WORD ALIGNS WITH THE END OF THE STALL STRIPING BENEATH PARKED VEHICLE:30'-0"DRIVE AISLE15'-0"PER F.D.DH DH GL GL 230'±62'-3"72'± 9 6 ' - 2 "96'GL 10 10 10 7 7 6 6 6 6 2 2 10 10 10 10 2 1 1 2 3 4 4 6 18 8 9 10 12 13 14 12 13 25 63'-0"7 STD. STALLS @ 9'-0" EA.54'-0"6 STD. STALLS @ 9'-0" EACH 9'-0" 54'-0"6 STD. STALLS @ 9'-0" EACH 10'-0" 90'-0"10 STD. STALLS @ 9'-0" EACH 9'-0" 90'-0"10 STD. STALLS @ 9'-0" EACH 9'-0"8'-0"9'-0"26'-0"DRIVE AISLE18'-0"10'-0"90'-0" 10 STD . STALLS @ 9'-0" EACH 90'-0" 10 STD . STALLS @ 9'-0" EACH 5'-0" 1 1 ±18'-6" ±19'-6" ±5'-0" 90'-0" 10 STD . STAL L S @ 9'-0" EACH 63'- 0 " 7 ST D . ST A L L S @ 9'- 0 " EA . ±6'-0" ±10'-0" ±10'-0" ±16'-9" ±16'-3" 9'-0"30'-0"DRIV E AISL E 9'-0"10'-0"9'-0"19'-0"30'-0"DRIVE AISLE±35'-0"14 13 14 19 10'- 0 " 11 22 22 22 22 1 9 7 2 2 5 5 DISABLED PATH OF TRAVEL FROM PROJECT BOUNDARY SEE CIVIL PLANS 18 17 7 11 7 7 7 8 21 2121 1 1 1 1 1 7 7 ±3'-6"±3'-6"±34'-0"SETBAC K 20'-0"20'-0"26'-0"DRIVE AISLE18'-0"18'- 0 " 26'- 0 " DRI V E AIS L E ± 1 0 1 ' - 7 " S E T BA C K 30'-0"0.5% SLOPE FLOOR15 15 1 15 15 4'-0"1 1 23 23 JOIN (N) SIDEWALK TO (E) SIDEWALK (LOCATION APPX.) SEE CIVIL PLANS 24 24 24 24 24 ±34'-0"SETBACK11'-0"68'-6"SCREE N WALL ± 2 3 5 ' - 9 "RET A IN ING WA L L ±241'-4" RETAINING WALL COORDINATE DRAIN / SUMP PUMP DISCHARGE LOCATION WITH CIVIL PLANS 2 6 ' - 0 "DRIVE A IS LE 1 8 ' - 0 " 1 0 ' - 0 " 4 9 ' - 0 " D R I V E A I S L E 6'-0" 35'-0" SETBACK BY CC&R ENTRY ENTRY 2 0 ' - 0 " 3 8 ' - 0 " 5 3 9 9 9 7 EV CA EV EV CA CA EV CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA EV EV EV 35'-0" SETBACK BY CC&R 6'88'184'-0"BUILDINGONE STORY CONCRETE TILT UP INDUSTRIAL BUILDING 48,787 S.F. / 116 STALLS (2.38/1000) 38'-0" TOP OF PARAPET / 30'-0" CLEAR INTERIOR 304'-0" BUILDING **3'-0"**3'-0"3'-0"6'-0"1'-10 1/8"BICYCLE RACK PROVIDE A TOTAL OF (4) FOUR "U" BIKE RACK(S) WITH CROSS BAR FOR SITE BY: CYCLESAFE OR EQ. (616) 954-9977 **VERIFY DIMENSION WITH VENDOR REINFORCED CONC. PAD 6'-0"Erwin Grigorian, P.E. C033057 5376 N. Sterling Center Drive Westlake Village, CA 91361 Phone 818. 706. 3997 Fax 818. 706. 2453 Date: Job: Drawn by: Revisions Sheet : THIS DOCUMENT, AND THE IDEAS AND DESIGNS HEREIN, AS AN INSTRUMENT OF PROFESSIONAL SERVICES, IS THE PROPERTY OF JDO+ASSOCIATES, INC. AND IS NOT TO BE USED, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, FOR ANY PROJECT WITHOUT THE WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION OF JDO+ASSOCIATES, INC. SITE PLAN SITE PLAN FEB. 2020 AREAS AND COVERAGES ARE PRELIMINARY AND SUBJECT TO CHANGE UPON REVIEW SC: 1" = 20'-0" NORTH A-1 2018.12 VICINITY MAP N.T.S. PROJECT LOCATION NEW INDUSTRIAL BUILDING FOR 5850 CONDOR DRIVE MOORPARK, CALIF. 4M INVESTMENT CORPORATION TYPICAL PARKING STALLS20'-0" (SEE SITE PLAN)4" WIDE PTD. STRIPE, TYP. TO MATCH CITY PARKING STANDARD FIELD VERIFY PRIOR TO PAINTING 9'-0" (SEE SITE PLAN) 2'-0" (OVERHANG)10'-0"MOTORCYCLE(SEE SITE PLAN)4" WIDE PTD. STRIPE, TYP. TO MATCH CITY PARKING STANDARD FIELD VERIFY PRIOR TO PAINTING 5'-0" EACH MOTORCYCLE (SEE SITE PLAN) MOTORCYCLE STANDARD TRASH ENCLOSURE PIPE SLEEVE FOR CANE BOLTS OPEN AND CLOSED POSITION, TYP. 19'-0"9'-6"CONCRETEAPRON(4) - 4 YD. BINS (3' X 6' X 4') 8" HIGH x 6" WIDE CONC. CURBS, TYP. SOLID CORRIGATED METAL GATES (180° SWING) 6" THK. CONCRETE TILT-UP PANEL - PANEL (PAINTED ALL AROUND)4'-6"9'-0"9'-0"8'-0"CLEARSOLID CORRIGATED METAL ROOF, TYP.6'-0"2"CANE BOLT, TYP.9'-0"ATTACHMENT 3 I I/ ,1 I 1/ I 1/ 1/ I I I I/ I 1/ 1/ I '/ I I I I/ 1/ I/ '/ I I I I/ I I I/ 1( I I I I I II ? I I I I I I 'I 11 I I I I I I ,: I I I I I " l1 I I ,, I I I I Q C C C 0 □ ·1" . " \ :/'. :f: 0 ·.,· .,,. ·,· ;i ".' ,'j' ·., ·1' ' ,, ,, ' ' ,,, 1,,: 1,, k " " ,'i \. \ I \,'I 'I' I' ,, I ' ,, ' • I /1 ,, 0 '",, /. t ' - -/.t I I I I 0 I ' ' ' 'I I ' I I I '/ "1 ' I I I I /1 1, I ,. ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' a ' ' I I I ' ' _____ ...__I I ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ....., .·, '- i--, - ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' I I I I '" I I I I I ,~- ,' ' ' ' ' ' I _-:__-c.---- _ _,j -~ ' ' ' ' ' ' ' I I '' ,, ,, r ,I ,, " '' ' ' ·-.J I ····" --f ' 0 ____ _,_ ' I ---1, / I I ''O ' I I l1 ' / I ! i I I ~ //~/ II / / ~--- I --i C:::01 : 1 H I ---!..__ I I I -f ---- 1 I I ,,, ,1 -r--- ,1 ' ii I !' O '' /I / ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' I I I I 1' I I I ----/-........, __ I I ~-------/ I I I I I I ' I I I I I I I □ io , I I I I ' I I I I I I I I ----r------- ' ' ' ' , __ -' '-, -0 · ..• -.,·•~:-:.: ,. 0 □ C 0 C 0 0 0 ----/ I I I I I I I 0 I- I -----:..- 1 -~------- / I -- 1 I I ' I / -------~~, .1:i: I .. "-. - --~:-: - \ ' ' ' -D- 0 ,------,.- J <\'. "\<:·---.\:·\.::\, > ', "-",<, '\ ', \ ' \ ----□ ll r _____ _ Tr i-County Po we-rsp-ons 9 9'1es t Equity co ~<io r llJ Tu rbonetics nc 9 Happy r.::imri CBnyon WDC k itche n & I!'\ li 8.1 h Mo orpark 'T" a ArrO)'a Sl:ni Rl'I,,; ~ndor (ll Virgin ia c ol on1• Parle: En.;;ign-E1 1ckford ft A!:!rospac::e T + A ssoc l a t e s 'l~oFESSi ~,:;> ,. GRIGoA W/4-"' T~ ~ .~ 'I-~ "' -'Z ffi No. C 033057 m a:. Exp. June 30, 2020 * 37 Erwin Grigorian, P.E. C033057 5376 N. Sterling Center Drive Westlake Village, CA 91361 Phone 818. 706. 3997 Fax 818. 706. 2453 Date: Job: Drawn by: Revisions Sheet : THIS DOCUMENT, AND THE IDEAS AND DESIGNS HEREIN, AS AN INSTRUMENT OF PROFESSIONAL SERVICES, IS THE PROPERTY OF JDO+ASSOCIATES, INC. AND IS NOT TO BE USED, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, FOR ANY PROJECT WITHOUT THE WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION OF JDO+ASSOCIATES, INC. EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS FEB. 2020 A-2 2018.12 NEW INDUSTRIAL BUILDING FOR 5850 CONDOR DRIVE MOORPARK, CALIF. 4M INVESTMENT CORPORATION T.O. PARAPET EAST ELEVATION (PARTIAL) WEST ELEVATION SOUTHEAST ELEVATION SOUTH ELEVATION (PARTIAL) CONDOR DRIVE LOS ANGELES AVENUE KEYNOTES 1) SMOOTH CONCRETE TILT-UP PANEL - PAINTED DUNN EDWARDS NO. DE6240 "WATERMIST", TYP. 2) SMOOTH CONCRETE TILT-UP PANEL - PAINTED DUNN EDWARDS NO. DE6242 "WELLS GRAY", TYP. 3) SANDBLASTED AND CLEARSEALED NATURAL CONCRETE TILT UP WALL (DESIGN MIX AGGREGATE) W/ V-GROOVE ACCENT LINES (RETURN GROOVES & FINISH AT ALL EXPOSED SIDES), TYP. 4) 1" THICK VITRO ATLANTICA SOLARBAN 70XL (2) OVER CLEAR IN CLEAR ANODIZED OFFSET ALUMINUM STOREFRONT WITH SILICONE VERTICAL JOINTS, TYP. AT RECESSED OPENINGS 5) 1" THICK VITRO ATLANTICA SOLARBAN 70XL (2) OVER CLEAR IN CLEAR ANODIZED OFFSET ALUMINUM STOREFRONT WITH SILICONE VERTICAL JOINTS, TYP. AT BUILDING SURFACE 6) EXTERIOR PLASTER SOFFIT OVER RECESS WITH CONTINUOUS VENTED SCREED (BRUSHED ALUM.) AND AUTOMATIC RECESSED LIGHTING, TYP. - SOFFIT PAINTED DUNN EDWARDS NO. DE6240 "WATERMIST", TYP. 7) HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL V-GROOVE ACCENT LINES, TYP.- EXTEND INTO OPENINGS AND BEHIND PANELS AT ALL AREAS WHERE EXPOSED, TYP. 8) STAINLESS STEEL EXTERIOR CLADDING SYSTEM, TYP. 9) WALL MOUNTED LIGHT FIXTURE (CL AT 23'-6" AFF) - COLOR TO MATCH BUILDING, TYP. - SEE ELEC. PLANS 10) 3'-0" X 8'-0" (PAIR) CLEAR ANODIZED OFFSET ALUMINUM STOREFRONT DOORS AND GLAZING TO MATCH ADJACENT 11) 3' X 7' METAL DOOR PAINTED DUNN EDWARDS NO. DET421 "LE CORBUSIER CRUSH", TYP. 12) 9' X 12' ROLL UP TRUCK DOOR AT DOCK HIGH CONDITION PAINTED DUNN EDWARDS NO. DE6242 "WELLS GRAY", TYP. 13) 12' X 14' ROLL UP TRUCK DOOR AT GRADE LEVEL PAINTED DUNN EDWARDS NO. DE6242 "WELLS GRAY", TYP. 14) 3'-0" WIDE METAL CANOPY WITH STEEL CHANNEL FASCIA AND SOLID COVER , TYP. PAINTED DUNN EDWARDS NO. DE6377 "BOAT ANCHOR" 15) 42" HIGH CONC TILT-UP GUARDWALL AT TRUCK WELL - PAINTED DUNN EDWARDS NO. DE6240 "WATERMIST", TYP. 16) 42" SANDBLASTED & CLEARSEALED CONCRETE WALLS (DESIGN MIX AGGREGATE) AT ENTRIES (HT. VARIES) - SANDBLAST ALL SIDES WHERE EXPOSED, TYP. 17) 8' W X 3' H WALL MOUNTED HORIZ. LANDSCAPE SCREEN BY "GREENSCREEN" (SILVER) W/ NO. 5104 TOP/SIDE EDGE TRIM & NO. 5105 BOTTOM TRIM - ATTACHED W/ NO. 5132 CLIPS ON NO. 5159 8" STAND-OFF BRACKETS, TYPICAL 18) 10" (MIN.) HIGH ADDRESS NUMERALS CAST INTO BUILDING WALL- TYPESTYLE TO BE "FRIZ QUADRATA" 19) 3'-0" WIDE CANTILEVER METAL AWNING (OPEN) WITH PAINTED STEEL CHANNEL FASCIA AND S.S. MESH SCREENS, TYP. FASCIA AND FRAMING PAINTED DUNN EDWARDS NO. DET421 "LE CORBUSIER CRUSH", TYP. 20) STEEL COVER (FASTENED TO RETAINING WALL) WITH PAINTED W.W.M. FABRIC SCREEN - PAINT TO MATCH BLDG., TYP. EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS NORTHEAST ELEVATION 38'-0"41'-6"MAX. HT. = 30'-0" M-1 ZONE10'-0"7'-0"7'-0"7'-0"12 5 18 5 T.O. WALL 3'-6"7'-0"5850 3 75 SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" 2 5 5 5 8 4 8 8 11 6 25 5 5 8 4 6 4 6 4 6 4 10 61105 1111 4 52 1 13 12 11 13121213 19 141212 13 5 5122 2 14 17 5 999 DISTORTED VIEW DISTORTED VIEW DISTORTED VIEW DISTORTED VIEW SOUTH ELEVATION (PARTIAL) CONDOR DRIVE EAST ELEVATION NORTH ELEVATIONWEST ELEVATION LOS ANGELES AVENUE 16 161616 DISTORTED VIEW DISTORTED VIEW DISTORTED VIEW DISTORTED VIEW 6 4 64 INDICATES RETAINING WALL IN FOREGROUND- NOT SHOWN INDICATES RETAINING WALL IN FOREGROUND- NOT SHOWN 18'-0"1'-0"19 19 19 19 19 19 19 1717 1717 17171717 7 77 7 20 20 - .. I • ,- . . . . ' ' h 11 --•+-- ,- LJ ~ _1_ ---- --+ I I-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_ '--------------______ } ~ I , IA' . □ I I I I ,...;...c···.···.······· -·- □ i I A ssoc i ates 38 Erwin Grigorian, P.E. C033057 5376 N. Sterling Center Drive Westlake Village, CA 91361 Phone 818. 706. 3997 Fax 818. 706. 2453 Date: Job: Drawn by: Revisions Sheet : THIS DOCUMENT, AND THE IDEAS AND DESIGNS HEREIN, AS AN INSTRUMENT OF PROFESSIONAL SERVICES, IS THE PROPERTY OF JDO+ASSOCIATES, INC. AND IS NOT TO BE USED, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, FOR ANY PROJECT WITHOUT THE WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION OF JDO+ASSOCIATES, INC. EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS FEB. 2020 A-2 2018.12 NEW INDUSTRIAL BUILDING FOR 5850 CONDOR DRIVE MOORPARK, CALIF. 4M INVESTMENT CORPORATION T.O. PARAPET EAST ELEVATION (PARTIAL) WEST ELEVATION SOUTHEAST ELEVATION SOUTH ELEVATION (PARTIAL) CONDOR DRIVE LOS ANGELES AVENUE KEYNOTES 1) SMOOTH CONCRETE TILT-UP PANEL - PAINTED DUNN EDWARDS NO. DE6240 "WATERMIST", TYP. 2) SMOOTH CONCRETE TILT-UP PANEL - PAINTED DUNN EDWARDS NO. DE6242 "WELLS GRAY", TYP. 3) SANDBLASTED AND CLEARSEALED NATURAL CONCRETE TILT UP WALL (DESIGN MIX AGGREGATE) W/ V-GROOVE ACCENT LINES (RETURN GROOVES & FINISH AT ALL EXPOSED SIDES), TYP. 4) 1" THICK VITRO ATLANTICA SOLARBAN 70XL (2) OVER CLEAR IN CLEAR ANODIZED OFFSET ALUMINUM STOREFRONT WITH SILICONE VERTICAL JOINTS, TYP. AT RECESSED OPENINGS 5) 1" THICK VITRO ATLANTICA SOLARBAN 70XL (2) OVER CLEAR IN CLEAR ANODIZED OFFSET ALUMINUM STOREFRONT WITH SILICONE VERTICAL JOINTS, TYP. AT BUILDING SURFACE 6) EXTERIOR PLASTER SOFFIT OVER RECESS WITH CONTINUOUS VENTED SCREED (BRUSHED ALUM .) AND AUTOMATIC RECESSED LIGHTING , TYP. - SOFFIT PAINTED DUNN EDWARDS NO . DE6240 "WATERMIST", TYP. 7) HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL V-GROOVE ACCENT LINES, TYP.- EXTEND INTO OPENINGS AND BEHIND PANELS AT ALL AREAS WHERE EXPOSED, TYP. 8) STAINLESS STEEL EXTERIOR CLADDING SYSTEM, TYP. 9) WALL MOUNTED LIGHT FIXTURE (CL AT 23'-6" AFF) - COLOR TO MATCH BUILDING, TYP. - SEE ELEC. PLANS 10) 3'-0" X 8'-0" (PAIR) CLEAR ANODIZED OFFSET ALUMINUM STOREFRONT DOORS AND GLAZING TO MATCH ADJACENT 11) 3' X 7' METAL DOOR PAINTED DUNN EDWARDS NO. DET421 "LE CORBUSIER CRUSH", TYP. 12) 9' X 12' ROLL UP TRUCK DOOR AT DOCK HIGH CONDITION PAINTED DUNN EDWARDS NO. DE6242 "WELLS GRAY", TYP. 13) 12' X 14' ROLL UP TRUCK DOOR AT GRADE LEVEL PAINTED DUNN EDWARDS NO. DE6242 "WELLS GRAY", TYP. 14) 3'-0" WIDE METAL CANOPY WITH STEEL CHANNEL FASCIA AND SOLID COVER , TYP. PAINTED DUNN EDWARDS NO. DE6377 "BOAT ANCHOR" 15) 42" HIGH CONC TILT-UP GUARDWALL AT TRUCK WELL - PAINTED DUNN EDWARDS NO. DE6240 "WATERMIST", TYP. 16) 42" SANDBLASTED & CLEARSEALED CONCRETE WALLS (DESIGN MIX AGGREGATE) AT ENTRIES (HT. VARIES) - SANDBLAST ALL SIDES WHERE EXPOSED, TYP. 17) 8' W X 3' H WALL MOUNTED HORIZ . LANDSCAPE SCREEN BY "GREENSCREEN" (SILVER) W/ NO. 5104 TOP/SIDE EDGE TRIM & NO. 5105 BOTTOM TRIM - ATTACHED W/ NO. 5132 CLIPS ON NO. 5159 8" STAND-OFF BRACKETS, TYPICAL 18) 10" (MIN.) HIGH ADDRESS NUMERALS CAST INTO BUILDING WALL- TYPESTYLE TO BE "FRIZ QUADRATA" 19) 3'-0" WIDE CANTILEVER METAL AWNING (OPEN) WITH PAINTED STEEL CHANNEL FASCIA AND S.S. MESH SCREENS, TYP. FASCIA AND FRAMING PAINTED DUNN EDWARDS NO. DET421 "LE CORBUSIER CRUSH", TYP. 20) STEEL COVER (FASTENED TO RETAINING WALL) WITH PAINTED W.W.M. FABRIC SCREEN - PAINT TO MATCH BLDG., TYP. EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS NORTHEAST ELEVATION 38'-0"41'-6"MAX. HEIGHT = 30-0" M-1 ZONE10'-0"7'-0"7'-0"7'-0"12 5 18 5 T.O. SCREEN WALL 3'-6"7'-0"5850 3 75 SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" 2 5 5 5 8 4 8 8 11 6 25 5 5 8 4 6 4 6 4 6 4 10 61105 1111 4 52 1 13 12 11 13121213 19 141212 13 5 5122 2 14 17 5 999 DISTORTED VIEW DISTORTED VIEW DISTORTED VIEW DISTORTED VIEW SOUTH ELEVATION (PARTIAL) CONDOR DRIVE EAST ELEVATION NORTH ELEVATIONWEST ELEVATION LOS ANGELES AVENUE 16 161616 DISTORTED VIEW DISTORTED VIEW DISTORTED VIEW DISTORTED VIEW 6 4 64 INDICATES RETAINING WALL IN FOREGROUND- NOT SHOWN INDICATES RETAINING WALL IN FOREGROUND- NOT SHOWN 18'-0"1'-0"19 19 19 19 19 19 19 1717 1717 17171717 7 77 7 20 20 ,I IA ~ I I ml! m ' ' I = , IC.. ~·~I eii ,_H I ._, ~ C: ~ I ,Ill I .. r □ 17 11 _u __ _ : :: . :: : ·. :: : :: .. : :: . ::::::-.•.· -:::::: .. ,·,: :: : . ::: . . ::: . : : . : : : 1.-< : : .·. : : .. : : : : .. : . : ·. . ·. : : :: : . :: : : : : : : :: : :•: : : I: :I I: · I : I I .· .· : :: .· ·. : ······: ., .... ,,,.,., .......... , ....... . . . : I : •• . •• : : •• : :. . . ·.· ".'.'.'.'." . : : ',_. . .. '.'.'." '' ., ?, : . I 1~_J/ □ I , I I-<' I .~ ' .. 1: . I : ~ -:-:- : ·. - I 11 ' n !!!I n ™ ' ffiffi gl ·-~ , -. -. -_--. -_ - I / I . : : . I . .· : : - - I- I I 11 I I \ ' \. '· : I , L. ,~~ ---~. i 'I, , LJ r II ~, I I / , : , , -- ' ·. - - - - -- - - I I I I I I \ \ \ II II -- I L__J r r " 1,.1' ---- -- I I il I ., .. > ' F ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ - / /' / / / '7 □ Associa t es -·-- - \~ GRIG $ ..,, ~ No. C 033057 m p. June 30, 20 39 Erwin Grigorian, P.E. C033057 5376 N. Sterling Center Drive Westlake Village, CA 91361 Phone 818. 706. 3997 Fax 818. 706. 2453 Date: Job: Drawn by: Revisions Sheet : THIS DOCUMENT, AND THE IDEAS AND DESIGNS HEREIN, AS AN INSTRUMENT OF PROFESSIONAL SERVICES, IS THE PROPERTY OF JDO+ASSOCIATES, INC. AND IS NOT TO BE USED, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, FOR ANY PROJECT WITHOUT THE WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION OF JDO+ASSOCIATES, INC. BUILDING PLAN SC: 1/16" = 1'-0" NORTH BUILDING PLAN FEB. 2020 A-3 2018.12 NEW INDUSTRIAL BUILDING FOR 5850 CONDOR DRIVE MOORPARK, CALIF. 4M INVESTMENT CORPORATION R .D . R .D .R .D .R.D. R.D. 304'-0" 236'-0"68'-0" 56'-0"184'-0"40'-0"48'-0"48'-0"48'-0"96'-2"62'-2 3/4"52'-0"50'-0"52'-0"50'-0"44'-0"72'-0"5'-0" 50'-0"6'-0" UPUP KEYNOTES 1) CONCRETE TILT-UP WALL PANEL , TYP. - SEE EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS FOR FINISH 2) EXTERIOR PLASTER SOFFIT OVER RECESS WITH CONTINUOUS VENTED SCREED ( BRUSHED ALUM .) 3) 1" THICK VITRO ATLANTICA SOLARBAN 60 (3) OVER CLEAR IN CLEAR ANODIZED OFFSET ALUMINUM STOREFRONT WITH SILICONE VERTICAL JOINTS, TYP. AT RECESSED OPENINGS 4) 1" THICK VITRO ATLANTICA SOLARBAN 60 (3) OVER CLEAR IN CLEAR ANODIZED OFFSET ALUMINUM STOREFRONT WITH SILICONE VERTICAL JOINTS, TYP. AT BUILDING SURFACE. 5) 3'-0" X 7'-0" STOREFRONT ENTRY DOORS (PAIR), TYP. 6) 3' X 7' METAL DOOR WITH PAINTED FINISH - COLOR TO BE DUNN EDWARDS NO. DE6375 "CASTLEROCK", TYP. 7) 9' X 12' ROLL UP TRUCK DOOR AT DOCK HIGH CONDITION WITH PAINTED FINISH - COLOR TO BE DUNN EDWARDS NO. DE6375 "CASTLEROCK", TYP. . 8) 12' X 14' ROLL UP TRUCK DOOR AT GRADE LEVEL WITH PAINTED FINISH - COLOR TO BE DUNN EDWARDS NO. DE6375 "CASTLEROCK", TYP. 9) 3'-0" WIDE CANTILEVER METAL AWNING (OPEN) WITH PAINTED STEEL CHANNEL FASCIA AND S.S. MESH SCREENS, TYP. FASCIA AND FRAMING PAINTED DUNN EDWARDS NO. DE6377 "BOAT ANCHOR" 10) Ø STD. PIPE COLUMN PAINTED SAFETY YELLOW TO 10'-0" A .F.F. & DUNN EDWARDS NO. DE6377 "BOAT ANCHOR" ABOVE, TYP. - SEE STRUCTURAL PLANS 11) RECESSED TRUCK WELL WITH 42" HIGH CONCRETE TILT UP GUARDWALLS. SLOPE TO DRAIN AND SUMP PUMP - SEE CIVIL PLANS, TYP. 12) 3'-6" HIGH SANDBLASTED & CLEARSEALED CONC. TILT UP GUARDWALL AT ENTRY STAIRS / DISABLED ACCESS RAMP. 13) ELECTRICAL ROOM - SEE ELECTRICAL PLANS 14) 10' X 12' CONCRETE TRANSFORMER PAD LOCATION - SEE ELECTRICAL PLANS 15) 4'-0" WIDE (MIN .) X 4" THICK REINFORCED CONC . WALK WITH BROOM FINISH AND SAW CUT CONTROL JOINTS AT 4'-0" O.C., TYP. - PROVIDE TRUNCATED WARNING DEVICES AS REQUIRED . 16) 8' (W) X 3' (H) WALL MOUNTED PANELS (8" STAND-OFF) HORIZ . LANDSCAPE SCREEN (SILVER) BY "GREENSCREEN", TYP. 17) NEW "U - BICYCLE RACK WITH CROSS BAR" BY SAFE CYCLE OR EQ. ON REINFORCED CONC . PAD, TYP. 18) 3'-0" WIDE METAL CANOPY WITH STEEL CHANNEL FASCIA AND SOLID COVER - PAINTED DUNN EDWARDS NO. DE6377 "BOAT ANCHOR", TYPICAL. 1 1 1 1 1 2 3 2 3 2 3 235 235 13 6 6 6 6 7 7 8 8 18 188 10 4 4 14 15 1212 15 16 161616 16 16 16 16 23 2 3 9 99 9 UPUPUP RAMP DN. @ ±6.667%LANDSCAPING, TYPICAL 7 7 LANDSCAPING, TYPICAL LANDSCAPING, TYPICAL 0.5% SLOPE FLOOR0.5% SLOPE FLOOR4'-0" TYP.4'-0"TYP.CONCRETE - SLOPE TO DRAIN CONCRETE - SLOPE TO DRAIN0---1 ' I I D--1 I I ' ◄ I I ► I I I I I I I ·-·-·-·--·--·--·--·--·-·-·-·~-----·--·--·--·--·--·-·-·~---·--·--·--·--·--·-·-·~---------------~, -------------, - ' I I o--: I I ' ' I I o--: I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ----~'===OO'nl; --------------+---------------1',: n -----------~-______________ J_ --------------~ ---h·' .. ··• ~:•-~~- I'◄+-I i "---LJ I I : I I I I I I I I ~ I I I I I -0 -0 I I I I I I I I I I +--------------+- I ----------------------------,}--------------------------,[,--------------------------<}---------------------------T ------------------ I I I I I I I I -0 I L 99 I I < I 1 e-e--,, 11 I I I L_ J I I I I I I I I L_ o · I D-.•1 0- I I rD I J □ As ,sociates ,~ GRJGq~ ,2' ,;,~ i No. C 033057 m xp. June 30, 20 40 GENERAL PLANTING REQUIREMENTS: THERE SHALL BE A MINIM.JM OF ONE (1) SHRUB PER ONE-HUNDRED (100) S.F. AND ONE (I) TREE PER FIVE-HJNDRED ('500) SF, EXCLUSIVE OF STREET TREES LOCCATED HITHIN THE PARKHAY AREA SITE AREA, BB,854 SF TREES, ONE (I) TREE PER 500 SF REQUIRED TREES • 61 PROPOSED TREES, • 50 EXISTIN& TREES TO REMAIN =....:29. PROVIDED TREES • 1'1 REQUIRED TREES, 15% OF TREES SHALL BE 24' BOX 25% OF TREES SHALL BE 15 SAL TREES PROVIDED, I -24• BOX BB -B' BOX 12 -4' BOX 4 -5' BOX SHRU65, 00% OF SHRU65 HILL BE 5 SAL 20% OF SHRUBS HILL BE I SAL , , " , , // // , ,, ,, , , , , , , , ,, ,, // II / " ...,__ ' I II r ' ' r r ' ' i r I I f I ! ' r r /•'-1. 1> /.':-= i I \ii , 00 --i~~ --.----=---:----::-- ::::::: L 24 --------= :::::::: ' r ' r r ' r ' r ' ' -------,!,...._ ' ' r ' ' ' r r ' r ' ' ' ' r r r ' ' ' ' ' r r r ' ' r ' r ' \ RETAINING WALL .... .· -: ===~~~::::=~:=::::~~ ······· ' r r ' ' ' ' r ' r ' r ' ' r ' ' ' r ·. ' ' ·- ,• ' r ' ' r ' ' ' r r ' r ' ' --~ . 11 ~ _,;:/ \ II \ \ // , , GREEN SCREEN WITH VINES r , --,-I r r r r '<::\> \ , i , I , , , ,, ,, ,, // , , , , 1:r , , " // // ,, ,, , , , , , , , ,, ,, // // , , , j1 I I " // , ,, I , , , , , , , ,, !!' ,,:/ !o " 48" BO IS ' ' ' ' ' , r ' r r ' ' r , ' r ' ' ' , r r r ' ' r f ' ' r , ' ' r , r. I 1·' r r ' • ' ' r ' ' ' ' : ' ' r ' ' of / r r r , ' r , r , r r r , ' r r ' ' r ' ' r ' ' ' r ' ' r ' r 48 11 BO•x--:11,W:,:......i"--~~ r ' ' / ,1 ' ' ' / .j ' ' ' $i g/ I I <c 4J / Hi:; I / •' ,' / cl I ' I • 36" BO BICYCLE RACK ······· (!) 36" BO ·· .. -· ,.• 36"-42" TALL PAR NG LOT SCREENING HEDGE RHAPHIOLEPIS U. ' INOR' r ' r ' ' r ' '®' r 6 r ' ' ! ' ' , r r , :@: ' ' 0 0 0 ' r ' ' r ' r r ' ' ' ' r ' , r r ' I ----r--- ' ' ' ' ' ' , r r r r ' r , r , ' ' , r ' ' ' r r ' ' ' ' r ' ' -,-__ _ ' ' ' ' I '•. ' ;, '·, ~z c_ -~~~ \ ' ' ONE STORY CONCRETE :TIL T UP ' ' ' ' RETAINING ' ~ vv--\ @~·-' ,': / . •.,q._ l ~~~~~ : .. <.;~ ~ \\ r ' ' -------L_ ' r INDUSTRIAL BUILDING ' r r ' ' ' ' WALL r ' ' ' r ' r ' ' ' ' r ' ' ' ' ' r ' r r ' r ' ' r ' r ------ ' r ' r r ' r r ' r ' ' r ' r r ' ' ' ' r r r r ,' ,fcj\ : r~, ' ' ' ' r ' r r , r i®/ r ' r r r ' ' r ' r ' ' ' ' r T ' r ' r ' r r ' r r r ' r r r ' r ' r ' ' ' ' ' r r r r r ' ' ------ ' r ' r ' ' r ' r ' ' ' ' r r ' ' 24" BO P RKING LOT ' ' ' ' 36" BO r ' ' ' r ' , "'~----'=l=c cc --_)~'= r ' r ' ' r ' ® ·o DR\\/~ __ ® _____ ® __ -------.tt--t0 0 0 • ' r ' r ' ' r ' r ' r ' r r ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' r r r ' ' ' ' ' ' ' r ' r ' ' ' ' r ' ' ' r r ' r -----+------- ' r ' ' r ' r ' ' r ' r r ' r ' ' ' r ' ' ---i--_ r ' r ' r r r r ' ' ' • ' ' ' ' r r ' r ' ----I GREEN SCRE-EN--WLlH_\IIN~S : ,fcj\ ! r~r r ' r ' ' r ' r ' r r ---r ' ' ' ' ' ' ' r ' r ' ' r ' ' ' r ' ' BICYCLE RACK ' r r ' r r SCORED & COLORED CONCRETE r ' :®: ,i 1 o / ' r r ' ' 36" BO 36"-42" TALL PARKING LOT SCREENING HEDGE - RHAPH PIS U. 'MINOR' LA REVIEW CHECKLIST ROVALBLOCK APPROVED CITY OF MOORPARK These plans have been reviewed and found to be in compliance with relevant sections of the Moorpark Municipal Code and the Conditions of Approval for (Permit Case No.) and (Permit Case No.). Landscaping and Irrigation shall be installed on the subject property substantially as shown herein. Approved by:--~--~~~~--~~--------- Community Development Director 0 ' -~-: \ \ ,\_~~"• 0 '. \ . ', \, ~.'· \\ .. · "\: ,.__. . ", \.;.,;> ·:,· .. ' ~\ <\ • . '\.. . . .. ' ' '< ,.'' .. -~ < ~i~ i <{ . '\ "' \·• • '·i, ~ _., , .. ·-:-:, -~, 0 TITLE SHEET SCALE: l" ~ 20'-0" 0 20 40 L PROJECT SUMMARY SITE ADDRESS LEGAL DESCRIPTION A.P.N. A.P.N. A.P.N. SITE AREA ZONE: CODE: TYPE: OCCUPANCY: BUILDING AREA PARKING REQUIRED INDUSTRIAL (2/1000) PARKING PROVIDED STANDARD DISABLED MOTORCYCLE 5850 CONDOR DRIVE, MOORPARK, CA. 90321 LOTS 17,18AND 31 OF TRACT NO. 3492, BOOK95, PAGE 30 OF MAPS IN THE OFFICE OF COUNTY RECORDER, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES 513-060-175 LOT 17 513-060-185 LOT 18 513-060-315 LOT 31 150,948.91 S.F. (3.465 AC) M-1 2019 CBC,CFC, CMC, CPC, CEC, CAL GREEN Ill - B -FULLY SPRINKLERED S-1, F AND ACCESSORY B 48,787 SF 97 STALLS 107 STALLS 5 STALLS 4 STALLS TOTAL PARKING PROVIDED 116 STALLS (2.38/1000) BICYCLE PARKING INTERIOR (LONG TERM) EXTERIOR (SHORT TERM) ( 7 ) REQ'D. / ( 7 ) PROV'D. ( 7 ) REQ'D. / ( 8 ) PROV'D. F.A.R. COVERAGES BUILDING (F.P. / SITE) PAVING LANDSCAPING HARDSCAPE 48,787 SF= .32 / 1 48,787 SF= 32.3202 % 62,067 SF = 41, 1179% 37,060 SF = 24.5513 % 3,035 SF = 2.0106 % LANDSCAPE DOCUMENTATION \ I AGREE TO COHPL Y HITI-1 THE REGlJIREHENTS OF THE WATER EFFICIENT LAND5GAPE ORDINANCE AND SUBMIT A C.OHPLETE L.ANDSC-APE ORDINANCE DOGUHENTATION PAc.KASE. FEB. 10, 2020 REVIEW CHECKLIST PECTION REQUIREMENTS LANDSCAPE LANDSCAP (HOMEO S ASSOCIATION, COMMERCIAL -CITY MAINTAINED LANDSCAPE AREAS) AND OTHER SCHEDULE: 2.0 3. 4. ~scape representative will inspect construction for compliance with ed landscape plans. Contractor shall notify the City's landscape ntative 48 hours in advance of each of the required inspections: 0 Irrigation coverage test and planting inspection. The irrigation coverage test shall be completed concurrently with the planting inspection. Final inspection: at the start of the gO-day maintenance period. Preliminary Certificate of Compliance may be granted at this time. Document submittal: As-built plans, backflow assembly certifications, soils analysis reports, four (4) sets of controller keys, laminated controller charts, product data and warranties. 30 days prior to the end of the maintenance period. Final Certificate of Compliance: at the end of the gO-day maintenance period or as specified by the City's Community Development Director. VICINTIY MAP N.T.S. f"J • Tr i -County l?owersports Sim i 'h1i ley t':\ I;\ lfarrey Davidson Y Y '9 Te st [qu ity Co";orlll Q Penny Mac; Loijn Servioos ,/¢ • Turbonetics lncc;) i '5850 Condor Dr ive if PROJECT LOCATION Happy Camp Canyon woe 1rnct1f"Tl & t'.:\ Bath Moorpa1k Y Vi rginia Co lony Park 1:m1.1gn-Bickf ord ft A~rosp11t~ T THE OFFICE OF SUSAN E. McEOWEN LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT 2180 A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION 19197 Golden Valley Road, #924 Santa Clarita, CA 91387 Office Telephone: (661) 212-3335 Email Address: susan@landarch.us 0 0 -I><: 0 "'T 0 "'T • "'T N \0 • These drawings ore not final and shall not be used for construction purposes until signed by Susan E. Mc:Eowen, Landsc;ape Arc;hitect #218D. These plans and all contained thereon are an original, unpublished work and may not be duplic:ated, published or used in whole or port without prior written consent by Susan E. McEowen START DATE, REVISION DATE 01: REVISION DA TE 02, REVISION DA TE 03, DRAHNBY, GHEC.KED B"(, FILE NUMBER, r---00 ---M E-s E-s E-s 000 ....:1 ....:1 ....:1 l/) l/) l/) r---00 ---M I I I 000 \0 \0 \0 000 I I I MMM ---l/) l/) l/) • • • zzz • • • SEPT. b, 201<:r Gin' c:.oMHENTS DEc-. 13, ~01'1 l'cEV. SITE 4 BLDG. FEB. l, 2020 REV 03 5EM 5EM 201"1-ei-10 LP-0 CONDOR DRIVE 41 " i " " // // " '{ r, " " " " " " " ,, r, // // " " " i " " " " " ,, ,, r, // " " " " 1:r " " " // // ,, 'r " " " " " " " r, /, // // " " " j1 I " " // " ,, I " " " " " " " ,, !!' ,,:/ !o " 48" BO 48" BO ····· ....... 0 IS z 2 L,j () z Q:' Q ; r r r , r r r r r r r r ' r r r r r r r r r f , r r r r r r r r I 1·' r r ' r r r , I /' r r r r r r r r ' r r r r r r r r , r r r r r r r r , r r r r r r r ' I ·< I ~ r r r r r r r , I ., cl , r r r r , r r r r r r r , r r r r ' r r r r r r r r I 1,>, r " r r r r r r r r , r i r I I I I I \~I \\I\\ I 1 \\I \I L •oP-1 r r r r r ' r r r r r -------,!,...._ r ' r GREEN SCREEN WITH VINES r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r -------L_ r r r r r r r ' r ONE \ RETAINING WALL ······· ' r r r r r r r r r r r r ' r r r r r r r ' r r r r r r r ' r r r r r r r r r ' i ----r--- 1 r r r , r r r r r r ' r r r r r r r r , r STORY CONCRETE :TIL T UP INDUSTRIAL BUILDING ' r ,• r r r r r r ' r r r r r r r ' r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r ' r r r r r r r r r r r r ' r -----+------- r r r ' r r r r r r r ' r ------ r r r r r r r r r r r r ' r r r r r r r ' -1--.,, ..._.'--·J' C:, "a' -/--,--•--.,~--/.- BICYCLE RACK r r r r ,' ,fcj\ : r~, r r r , r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r ' r r r r r r r ------ r r r r r ' r r r r r r { r 36 INCH BOX--TR!EES ACR-OSS~~ FAG F BUILDING AND AT TRIES. r r r r r r ' r r r r r r r ' r r r r r r ---i--_ r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r ----I GREEN SCRE-EN--WLlH_\IIN~S I -1 --~-.!1. ~ ' ,-7 _,_____ I __, __ r ---r r r r r r r ' r r r r r r r ' r r r r -~ --==~~~~==~--~,-"'!,.~ --cc= BICYCLE RACK ······· r ' r r r r r r r : ,fcj\ ! #16::··•' ·· .. jjcl1 ... •' ,.• 36"-42" TALL PAR NG LOT SCREENING HEDGE RHAPHIOLEPIS U. ' INOR' r 6 r r r '®' ! { r r r ' r L ,--. r -, ' r_ r r r r ' r r r r :@: r r r r r r i®/ r r r r r r T r r r r 24" BO P RKING LOT ,, - // // '{ 'r r, // rrr,!<.,'vl]i' // // // • .,,,,"'r._r, r r r r r r r r r 36" BO r r r r r r r r r r r r r ' r r r r~r r r ! { r r / /fiO'-/ '~r r r r r ' r r r r r r . 36" BO 36"-42" TALL PARKING LOT SCREENING HEDGE - RHAPH PIS U. 'MINOR' ' r r r r -,-__ _ r r r : RETAINING : WALL r ' r r r r r r r SCORED & COLORED CONCRETE 36" BO '.'.~ ------------------------~-~ ----=-cc_ cc_ -~~ ~;-~2»'!'1-~ 0 0 ' I Y-· \ ;;, \ URB &: G r ' 2, ,•:_foc-""°""-c. __________ SA""~~=------ ,,.. ® ~ ORI\/~ __ ® _____ ® __ -------~--t0 0 0 0 \@a\ ' ' ' ' \ ' .,-.<::;::. / .::·~~ .... ,, •' , -·,, ~~· _._:;: .. ..-• "ch,,_. LANDSCAPE PLAN REVIEW CHECKLIST CITY APPROVAL BLOCK APPROVED CITY OF MOORPARK 0 These plans have been reviewed and found to be in compliance with relevant sections of the Moorpark Municipal Code and the Conditions of Approval for (Permit Case No.) and (Permit Case No.). Landscaping and Irrigation shall be installed on the subject property substantially as shown herein. Approved by: _____________________ _ Community Development Director Mulch and Amendments: Landscape and Irrigation Maintenance Schedule: Landscapes of 11 ~ _,;:/ 2. 3. A minimum two inch (2") layer of mulch shall be applied on all exposed soil surfaces of planting areas except in turf areas, creeping or rooting groundcovers, or direct seeding applications where mulch is contraindicated. Stabilizing mulching products shall be used on slopes. The mulching portion of the seed/mulch slurry in hydro- seeded applications shall meet the mulching requirement. residential common areas, commercial or industrial projects, Homeowners Association area, City maintained landscape areas and Landscape Maintenance Districts shall be carefully and competently maintained to ensure water efficiency and high quality appearance. A watering schedule encased in plastic shall be kept inside each controller (with reduced as-built plans showing hydro-zones). Maintenance guideline notes must appear on the planting plan drawings. Using these standards and guidelines, a schedule for ongoing maintenance shall be prepared and shown on the planting plan. The maintenance guidelines shall be as follows: \ Planting plans for commercial, industrial, residential and Homeowners Association areas must include notation that a ninety (90) day maintenance period is required and that expenses are to be paid for by the owner. The City's landscape representative shall inspect all landscape areas for installation and maintenance compliance after the ninety (90) day maintenance period has ended. 100% plant survivability shall be required. (See Section 4.2, Landscape Condition Compliance Review) Planting plans for City maintained areas and Landscape Maintenance Districts must include notation that a one (1) year maintenance period is required and that the expenses are to be paid for by the owner. The City's landscape representative shall i spect the landscape areas for installation and maintenance c pliance after the one (1) year maintenance period has ended. 100 plant survivability and 100% coverage shall be required. (See action 4.2, Landscape Condition Compliance Review) B. C. D. A. Any alterations to the landscape must be approved by the Community Development Director. Control all harmful diseases and pests. All chemical applications must be per state licensed advisors and applications. Pruning shall be done to keep plants within special limitations, removal of deadwood, cross-branching, etc., per International Society of Arboriculture (ISA) standards. Plants shall never be sheared unless specified on the approved plan. Trees are to be allowed to grow to the designed size to provide maximum shading of paved areas. Water shall be applied for optimum plant growth with zero runoff or overspray. Adjust controllers per current California Irrigation Management Information System (CIMIS) data. Information can be obtained at www.cimis.ca.gov. Always replace heads with the same kind of head, or head with a matching precipitation rate. Repair of all irrigation equipment shall be done with the originally installed components or their equivalents. All street !~within ten feet (10') of walks, curbs, or other hardscape ar s shall be installed with a linear root barrier ~· ten feet (1 0') in ngth by twenty-four inch (24") in depth E. F. G. H. Backflow device shall be tested and certified annually by the Ventura County Environmental Health Division. --~'\ installed against the hardscape area centered on the tree I,!_ trunk. \ Inspect tree supports frequently, and remove as soon as the 0 '<, All shrub areas shall b~nstalled with minimum two-inch (2") depth \ of bark mulch. ~"z < -~~~ \ L I. J. 0 plants will stand without support and will be able to resist wind damage. Never allow support materials to girdle the trunk or branches. Landscape irrigation shall be scheduled during the night or ea~y morning hours. A regular maintenance schedule shall include, but not limited to, 0 routine inspection, adjusting, and repairing the irrigation equipment; aerating and de-thatching turf areas; replenishing mulch; fertilizing; pruning; weeding; removing litter in all landscaped areas; and removing obstructions to emission devices. Operation of the irrigation system outside the normal watering window is allowed for auditing and system maintenance only. Verify with the Ventura County Water Works District for current allowable time for irrigation water use. All street trees within ten feet (10') of walks, curbs, or other hardscape areas shall be installed with a linear root barrier ten feet (10') in length by twenty-four inch (24") in depth installed against the hardscape area centered on the tree trunk. RIGATION WILL BE A COMBINATION OF OVERHEAD SPRAY ON THE OPES AND DRIP THROUGHOUT THE PARKING AREA WITH A WEATHER SED CONTROLLER FORAN EFFICIENT IRRIGATION SYSTEM TO MEET 0 OR EXCEED THE GUIDELINES. LANDSCAPE PLAN REVIEW CHECKLIST LANDSCAPE INSPECTION REQUIREMENTS (HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, COMMERCIAL AND OTHER NON-CITY MAINTAINED LANDSCAPE AREAS) SCHEDULE: The City's landscape representative will inspect construction for compliance with the approved landscape plans. Contractor shall notify the City's landscape representative 48 hours in advance of each of the required inspections: 1. Irrigation coverage test and planting inspection. The irrigation coverage test shall be completed concurrently with the planting inspection. 2. Final inspection: at the start of the gO-day maintenance period. Preliminary Certificate of Compliance may be granted at this time. 3. Document submittal: As-built plans, backflow assembly certifications, soils analysis reports, four (4) sets of controller keys, laminated controller charts, product data and warranties. 30 days prior to the end of the maintenance period. 4. Final Certificate of Compliance: at the end of the gO-day maintenance period or as specified by the City's Community Development Director. SEE SHEET LP-2 FOR PLANT MATERIAL LEGENDS & PARKING LOT SHADE STUDY PRELIMINARY LANDSCAPE PLAN SCALE: I" ~ 20'-0" 0 20 40 THE OFFICE OF SUSAN E_ McEOWEN LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT 2180 A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION 19197 Golden Valley Road, #924 Santa Clarita, CA 91387 Office Telephone: (661) 212-3335 Email Address: susan@landarch.us 0 0 -~ 0 "'T 0 "'T • "'T N \0 • These drawings are nat final and shall not be used for construction purposes until signed by Susan E. McEowen, Landscape Architect #218D. These plans and all contained thereon are an original, unpublished work and may not be duplicated, published or used in whole or part without prior written consent by Susan E. McEowen START DATE, REVISION DATE 01: REVISION DA TE 02, REVISION DA TE 03: DRAHNBY: GHEC.KED B'(, FILE NUMBER, SEPT. b, 201<:r Gin' coMHENTS DEG. 13, ~01'1 l'cEV. SITE 4 BLDG. FEB. l, 2020 REV 03 5EM 5EM 201"1-ei-10 LP-1 CONDOR DRIVE 42 TREE LEGEND C-OMMON NAME SYME<::>lc~------OBOli5iT~A~NllilC-~A~L[j;NA~ME~==========:::i SIZE / GUANTITY / Y'IIJC,OLS • PISTAGIA C-. 'KElll-1 DAVEY' ---+,---FRJJITLESS C-HINESE PISTAGHE 48 INCH BOX I 12 / MOD PLAT ANUS A. 'C,OL.UMBIA' L.ONDON PLANE TREE bO" INC-H BOX/4/ 3b INGH BOX /5 / 24 INC-H BOX/I/ MO PYRU5 e, . 'C-HANTIC-LEER' • --r~C-!iHA'°'.NT~IC-<::.iLl,IEE~RtlPE~A~R~----------1 3b INC-H BOX I 28 I MOD EXISTING TREE LEGEND ,,.,...~._, ~ EUC,AL YPT\J5 POLY ANTHEMOS •• ---t------<11SILVER DOLLAR cSUM . • 0 ········ .. ··· ·· .. • ·· ... .. ... B TO REMAIN ON SITE / 2 -OFFSITE #'S 5, IB 4 14, OFF SITE OP-2 4 OP-B GUERGU5 A5Rl60LIA C-OAST LIVE OAK I EXISTING TO REMAIN (OFFSITE) # OP-I SC-HINIJS MOLL.E CALIFORNIA PEPPER 25 EXISTING TO REMAIN -PROTEC-T IN PLACE #'5 25-BI, B4-B1, Bq-46, 5B, 54, 56 4 58 HASHINGTONIA ROBIJSTA MEXIC-AN FAN PALM -PROTEC-T IN PL.AGE # B4 25 -EXISTING TREES TO BE REMOVED ◄ TREE #'5 1-4, 6-12, 32, 33, 38, 41, 51, 52, 55, 51, 5q < bO GROUNDGOVER LEGEND C-OMMON NAME SYMBOL ◄ BOTANIC-AL NAME SIZE / GUANTITY / H.JC-OLS NO SYMBOL 1MULGH 2' LAYER SHRUB LEGEND IN AL.L BEDS 1BOTANIC-AL NAME C-OMMON NAME SIZE / GUANTITY / H.JC-OLS _,JAGAVE SPP. -----<Ii~:~/ BO I 2-B' TAL.L X B' HIDE/ LOH BAC,C,HARIS P. 'PIGEON POINT' ------4DV'IARF C-OYOTE BUSH 5 GAL/ 200 I 2-B' TALL X 1--'1' HIDE / LOH C-ARISSA M. 'BOXHOOD BEAUTY' C-OMPACT NATAL PLUM 5 GAL /BOO I 2' TALL X 2' HIDE/ LOH C-EANOll-lUS MARIRIMUS VAL.L.EY VIOL.ET' ◄ MARITIME C-EANOTHUS 5 GAL/ 200 I 2' TALL X 4' HIDE / LOH El YMU5 G. 1C.ANYON PRINCE' C-ANYON PRINCE GIANT RYE GRASS 5 GAL/ 100 / 2-B' TAL.L X B' HIDE / LOH LANT ANA C. 'MONIKE' TEENIE GENIE C-OMPAGT LANTANA 5 GAL/ Bl / BO" TALL X BO" HIDE / LOH LAVANDULA 5. 'OTTO GUAST' ----~FRENCH LAVENDER I GAL / 100 / 2-B' TALL X 2-B' HIDE / LOH RHAPHIOLEPIS U. 'MINOR' -----<I DV'IARF YEDDO HAHTI-IORN 5 GAL/ 150 / B-4' TALL X -4-B' HIDE/ LOH LEUC-OPHYLLUM F. "C-OMPAGTUM' _____ _.,. C-OMPAC-T TEXAS RANGER 5 GAL/ 150 / 5' TAL.L X 5' HIDE/ LOH MULHENBERGIA RIGENS • DEER GRASS I GAL / 50 I 4' TALL X 4' HIDE / LOH OL.EA E. 'PETITE OLIVE' _____ _.,. DV'IARF OLIVE VINE LEGEND 5 GAL/ 150 I 4-b' TALL X -64' HIDE / LOH PENSTEMON SPEGTALBILIS • SHOHY PENSTEMON 5 GAL/ 50 I B' TALL. X -B' WIDE / LOH HESTRINGIA F. 'LOH HORIZON' • LOH HORIZON HESTRINGIA • 5 GAL/ 200 I I' TALL X -2' WIDE / LOH HESTRINGIA F. MUNDI' LOH C-OAST ROSEMARY 5 GAL/ 200 I 1-2' TAL.L. X 4-6' HIDE / LOH HARDENBERGIA V. 'HAPPY V'IANDERER' PURPL.E VINE LILAC- 15 GAL / 15 / LOH / TRAIN ON HALL CVS -CULTIVATED VARIETIES (BOTANY) SLOPE SHRUB LEGEND BOTANIC-AL NAME ◄ C,OMMON NAME SIZE / GUANTITY / Y'IIJC,OLS BAC,C,HARIS P. 'PIGEON POINT' ------.DV'IARF C-OYOTE BUSH 5 GAL/ 200 I 2-B' TALL X 1--'1' WIDE / LOH C-EANOTHUS G. YANKEE POINT' ------HILD LIL.AC, 5 GAL/ BOO I 2-B' TALL X 8-10' HIDE / LOH LANTANA C,. 'C-ONFETTI' -------YELLOH-PINK-PURPLE BUSH LANTANA 5 GAL / 100 / 2-B' TALL X 6-8' HIDE/ LOH VERBENA PERUVIANA RED PERINIAN VERBENA I GAL / 250 / 6-12" TAL.L X 2-B' HIDE / LOH TEIJC,RIUM C-HAMAEDRYS 1"RGSTRATA' ------.GERMANDER I GAL/ 250 / 4-b" TALL X B' HIDE / LOH SLOPE VINE LEGEND - MYRPORUM PARVIFOLIUM PINK' ----, PINK AUSTRALIAN RAGER FLATS/ PLANT@ 4' o.c,. I 6-12' TALL X 6-12' HIDE/ LOH CVS -CULTIVATED VARIETIES (BOTANY) ~------------------~, I / ,/ /' .. , ,, ,, / I ,, " " " I I I ,,/::/ I .. • • TREE REPORT: GENERAL PLANTING REQUIREMENTS: TREE REPLACEMENT VALIJE PER TREE REPORT PREPARED BY, TREE, ETC, , RIC-HARD IBARRA DATED, NOVEMER B, 201q THERE SHAL.L. BE A MINIMUM OF ONE (I) SHRUB PER ONE-HUNDRED (100) 5.F. AND ONE (1) TREE PER FIVE-HUNDRED /500) SF, EXC-LUSIVE OF STREET TREES LOC-ATED Hlll-llN THE PARKV'IAY AREA. VALUE OF TREES REMOVED, $llq,BOO.OO VALUE OF TREES REMOVED DUE TO SITE IMPROVEMENT,$ 66{)b0.00 VALUE OF TREE REMOVED DUE TO NEH C,ITY SIDEHALK, $ 5B,240.00 SITE AREA, BB,854 SF TREES, REPLACEMENTS, VARIETY SIZE GTY VALUE TOTAL ONE (I) TREE PER 500 SF REGUIRED TREES = 61 PISTAGIA C,. 'KEITH DAVEY 4' BOX (THELVE) 12 X $4,000 = 548.000.00 PROPOSED TREES, = 50 PLATAIVS A 'C,OLUMBIA' PYRU5 C, 'C-HANTIC-L.EER' 5' BOX (rOUR) 4 X $1,500 B' BOX /11-IREE) 5 X $1,250 2' BOX (ONE) I X $450 B' BOX (TWENTY-EIGHT) 28 X $1,250 = $BO ,000.00 = $ 6,250.00 = $ 450.00 = $35,000,00 TOTAL REPL.AC-EMENT VALUE =$llq,100.oo i I I I I I I I I I I EXISTING TREES TO REMAIN ~ PROVIDED TREES = 1q REGUIRED TREES, 15% OF TREES SHAL.L BE 24" BOX 25% OF TREES SHALL BE 15 GAL TREES PROVIDED, I -24" BOX BB -B' BOX 12 -4' BOX 4 -5' BOX SHRUBS, 80% OF SHRUBS HILL BE 5 GAL 20% OF SHRUBS HIL.L. BE I GAL "t-l.rN)-l l~11 48" BO ' ' ' ' I ·.; ' ! ~ · . .. z 2 w 0 z 0:: Q_ ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' I .. , ' ' ' ' ' ' ,, ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' I " " ~- ' ' ' ----~ I ------ ' GREEN SCREE~ VIHH VINES ' ' ' ' ' OP SL I RETAINING WALL ..... ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ! ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' , ONE STORY CONCRETE :TIL T UP ----------~------___ INDL/STRIAL BUILD/NG ' -------+ ' I -----I I I --------i' I I -r------ 0 ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' _____ .._ __ ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' " .. •,. .. ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' --.. - ' ' ' ' ' ' ' \ \ ~~""'~I -___ -\\\ \ ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' i RETAINING WALL ----.-- ' ' ' •., ,.___,<-,------~-- 1L L -' L\ ,~~~b / ,~/ " PARKING LOT SHADE STUDY, TREES & LANDSCAPED AREA TREES 1 TREE PER 4 SPACES 113 STALLS= 28 -24 INCH BOX TREES REQUIRED 30 -24 INCH BOX TREES PROVIDED LANDSCAPED AREA 10% OF PARKING LOT LANDSCAPE SQUARE FOOTAGE TO BE LANDSCAPE 105 of 45,973 SF OF PARKING AREA= 4,597.3 SF REQUIRED 5,650 SF PROVIDED SHADE STUDY SHADE STUDY PARKING LOT 62,067 SF LESS TRUCKAREA-13,700 SF 48,367 SF SCALE: 1 n = 30'-0" 0 30 60 50% OF 48,367 = 24,183.5 SF SHADED IN 15 YEARS TREE COVER IN 15 YEARS= 25,919 SF= 54% COVERAGE THE OFFICE OF SUSAN E. McEOWEN LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT 2180 A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION 19197 Golden Valley Road, #924 Santa Clarita, CA 91387 Office Telephone: (661) 212-3335 Email Address: susan@landarch.us 0 0 -~ 0 'tj" 0 'tj" • 'tj" N \0 • These drawings are not final and shall not be used for construction purposes until signed by Susan E. Mcfowen, Landscape Architect #2180. These plans and all contained thereon □re an original, unpublished work and may not be duplicated, published or used in whole or part without prior written consent by Susan E. McEowen START DATE, REVISION DATE ol, REVISION DA TE 02, REVISION DATE 03, DRAHN BY, GHEGKED BY, FILE NUMBER, SEPT. 6, 201"1 C.ITY c;.oMMENTS DEC.. 13, 20l'l REV. SITE -t BLD6. FEB. "1, 2020 REV 03 5EM SEM 201<1 B 10 LP-2 CONDOR DRIVE 43 From:Paul Minoo To:Freddy Carrillo Subject:5850 Condor Drive, Moorpark Date:Wednesday, June 24, 2020 2:43:14 PM To: City of Moorpark Planning Department Dear Sirs: The scope of the work from Edison Company has changed since Rule 20B is being implemented. The work that my contractor needs to do does not change. Therefore, the quotation remains the same. Currently the estimate from Edison is $109,398 plus $585,000 from my contractor, that totals to $694,398. We are willing to pay $75,000 from Edison and $150,000 from the contractor, that would be $225,000 in total. Therefore, I am requesting the City of Moorpark to find a way to come up to a solution for the remaining balance of $469,398. Best Regards, Paul Minoo 4M Investment Corporation 6222 Wilshire Blvd Suite 270 Los Angeles, CA 90048 tel # (213) 624-4040 x100 Fax # (213) 624-4050 Please consider only printing this email if necessary. ATTACHMENT 4 44 Freddy Carrillo From: Sent: To: Subject: Paul <paul @4minvestrnent.com> Thursday, July 02 , 2020 I :26 PM Freddy Carrillo Fwd: (Extemal):Re: (Extemal):5850 Condor Drive Paul Minoo 4M Investment Corporation 6222 Wilshire Blvd Suite 270 Los Angeles, CA 90048 Telephone# (213) 624-4040 xlO0 Fax# (213) 624-4050 Begin forwarded message : From: Rod King <Rod.King@ sce.com> Date: July 2, 2020 at 1: 1 7 :23 PM PDT To: Paul Minoo <paul @ 4minvestment.com> Subject: RE: (External):Re: (External):5850 Condor Drive Paul, The Rule 20C in voi ce would be $193,317.00 . I have obtained this amount directly from our pricing tool. If the city of Moorpark would like to discuss this amount that I have included I'll be more than happy to explain it to them. Rod King Local Service Planner Southern California Edison Thousand Oaks Service Center M . 805-290-7794 From: Rod King Sent: Wednesday, June 17, 2020 9:19 AM To: Paul Minoa <paul@4minvestment.com> Subject: RE: (External):Re: (External):5850 Condor Drive Paul , I have attached invoice due for the Rule 20B . Invoice includes SCE removing and in stalling SCE facilities . Easements will be required and You will still need to contact communication regarding there overhead wires for their pricing. 1 45 Arbabl Construction License 51-4421 (310)487-5818 21426 Velicata St. Woodland Hills, CA 91364 AffordableConstruction4u@yahoo.com PROPOSAL SUBMITTED TO: Mr. Paul Mino 5850 Condor Dr. Moorpark, CA 93021 4M Investments SCOPE OF WORK: We hereby propose to furnish the materials and perform the labor necessary for the completion of the installation of conduit and handholes for project. Materials include the following: (1) 6x12x7 Handhole-(Manhole) (1) 7x14x11 Handhole-(Type 1) (2) 5' conduits to complete project according to preliminary plans The process will be as follows: • Equipment and shoring parts mobilization & set-up. m All required notices and street signage. • Excavation of dirt and temporary shoring. • We will submit shoring plans and shop drawings per City of Los Angeles laws and regulations together with ail required approvals. • Cover all trenches with heavy steel plates for street traffic. • Provide aU required flagman's and daily traffic control as required by City of Los Angeles Public Works. • Haul away all e:)(cess dirt's, asphalt, and concrete and maintain a pre-approved hauling route per City of Los Angeles. • Backfill all trenches with concrete, together with fill and require compaction per soil engineer's report, prior to installation of the finished concrete. • All compaction to be performed upon supervision of the soil engineer, deputy inspector, or a representative and upon completion, get approval from Public Works. • All hot asphalt to bet set-up and noticed prior to submittal on the jobsite. A representative from the City of Los Angeles will approve asphalt upon delivery as required by City of Los Angeles Public Works approval. 46 1) We will install 2 handholes with shoring. 2) Saw cut the asphalt in the street 3) Trench the street 4) Remove 414 yds. of dirt and haul it to the dump. 5) Install conduit 6) Encase the conduit with approximately 96 yds. of encasement concrete. 7) Pour 352 yds. Slurry mix, backfill the hole. 8) Patch the road with asphalt Note: These plans did not show any conduit coming into your property and that needs to be corrected before starting work on the street. Also, we will plate the trench during our work. ""Arbabi Construction will not be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities nor the removal of water, dirt/debris, and hazardous materials, large or unforeseen materials from the job site . ... No bond or permit fees are included in this price . .,.Materials stored over 60 days may be subject to storage charges. *Some requests for insurance may include extra charges. All material is guaranteed to be as specified, and the above work ta be performed In accordance with the drawings and specifications submitted for above work, and completed in a substantial workmanlike manrierforthe sum ofFIVE HUNDRED EIGHTY-FIVE THOUSAND FIVE HUNDRED DOLLARS ($585,500). Payments to be made as follows: PROGRESS PAYMENTS Respectfully submitted, David Arbabi Any alteration or deviation from above specifications involving extra costs will be executed only upon written order and will become an extra charge over and above the estimate. NI agreements contingent upon strikes, accidents or delays are beyond our control. Note-This proposal may be withdrawn by us if not accepted within 60 days. 47 Southern California Edison Company Invoice Date: SCE Contact: Telephone: Install - Billing Option: Invoice Term: Customer Name: Customer Email: District Address: 90 Days GLENDOSHA INVESTMENT, LLC 06/17/2020 Rod D King6222 WILSHIRE BLVD STE 270 LOS ANGELES CA 90048 5193 3589 FOOTHILL DRIVE THOUSAND OAKS CA 91361 Document #7590309210 OTHER: This amount represents the total SCE other costs required to complete the work request. In most cases, this other amount will consist of all additional requirements needed for completing the work request. This other amount typically consists of items such as Added Facilities one time charges, contractor work, rights check, and permits. MATERIAL: This amount represents the total SCE material required to complete the work request. In most cases, this material amount will consist of construction material and any additional material required for completing the work request. The construction material will typically consist of installation and service material such as transformers, cable, conductor, poles, meters, riser, switches, fusing equipment, handholes, and cross-arms. All applicable material related overheads are also included TOTAL TAX: Description Amount Service Request Number 2701122 Project Description TD1557408 & TD1620530 - RULE 20B OH/UG $43,813.58 $78,909.35 $6,888.00 $129,610.93 $73,798.09 TAX: $74,535.03 $17,711.54 24.00% $17,888.41 24.00% $35,599.95 COMMENTS: DEPOSITS: TOTAL DEPOSITS: $(55,812.84) $0.00 $(7,500.00) $(7,500.00) $ 109,398.04 NET CONSTRUCTION BILLING / RELOCATION ADVANCE: TOTAL PROJECT INVOICE AMOUNT: * Enclosed are two copies of your invoice. Please return one copy of the invoice with your payment to Accounts Receivable in the enclosed return-addressed envelope. The other copy of the invoice is for your records. * ALL PRICES ARE APPLICABLE FOR A PERIOD OF 90 DAYS FROM THIS DATE AND ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE THEREAFTER. * All payments must be delivered by mail, an alternate postal method, or one of our electronic payment options. Walk-in payments are no longer accepted at any SCE location, including Accounts Receivable. * Please complete all applications and/or contracts and return to your planning office, using the enclosed return-addressed envelope. * Easement documents will be mailed directly to you from our Right of Way department. Please complete and return them as soon as possible, as we will not be able to proceed with the project without clearance . TOTAL CREDITS: LABOR: This amount represents the total SCE labor required to complete the work request. In most cases, this labor amount will consist of construction labor and any additional labor required for completing the work request. The construction labor amount will typically consist of installation and service labor required for the work request. The additional labor amount will typically consist of labor for inspection, cable and equipment make-up, dead ending, traffic control, grounding, supervision, and switching. All applicable labor related overheads for items such as the design, engineering, and project management are also included in the total SCE labor amount. This amount represents the total SCE credits required to complete the work request. In most cases, this credit amount will consist of: Salvage Credit Depreciation Credit JPA Credit Overhead Equivalent Credit 1. ITCC on Applicant Furnished Tax Base (Taxable Amount): Tax Rate: Tax Amount: 2. ITCC on Net Construction (Less Non Taxable Amount) Tax Base (Taxable Amount): Tax Rate: Tax Amount: Preliminary Design & Engineering Advance Previous Payment $(55,812.84) TOTAL LABOR, MATERIAL, OTHER: $73,798.09 CREDITS: Design #: 1557408 - RULE 20B - UG INSTALLProduct #: TD1557408 - RULE 20B - UG INSTALLDesign Description 1159220 5850 CONDOR DR MOORPARK CA 93021Project Location: Invoice # 357388 E:i E"DiSON Mi. f;DiSON INTHRNAflONAL C-l)mr 48 Southern California Edison Company Invoice Date: SCE Contact: Telephone: Install - Billing Option: Invoice Term: Customer Name: Customer Email: District Address: 90 Days GLENDOSHA INVESTMENT, LLC 06/17/2020 Rod D King6222 WILSHIRE BLVD STE 270 LOS ANGELES CA 90048 5193 3589 FOOTHILL DRIVE THOUSAND OAKS CA 91361 Document #7590309210 * Call the Edison company at 1-800-655-4555 to make application for electrical service. * An Edison Inspector must approve all underground systems. Please call your designated inspector 48 hours prior to construction to schedule an inspection. * By paying this invoice, customer acknowledges and agrees that if this project is canceled by customer for any reason or customer does not proceed with the project completion. * Any expense incurred by SCE, including, but not limited to, expenses related to engineering, inspection and construction, prior to the project cancellation or completion will be deducted from any applicable refund due to the customer. . COMMENTS CONTINUED: ADDITIONAL PAYMENT INSTRUCTIONS: If paying by check, please follow instructions on payment stub JP Morgan Chase Bank New York, NY ABA#: 021000021 - Acct#: 323-394434 SCE Taxpayer ID No. 95-1240335 Document #: 7590309210 SCE Contact: *** Failure to properly identify your document number and SCE contact may delay the application of funds and initiation of your project Instructions for wire or ACH payments: Special Instructions for overnight delivery methods:Southern California Edison Attn: Accounts Receivable 8631 Rush Street G-53 Rosemead, CA 91770 Rod D King 6222 WILSHIRE BLVD STE 270 LOS ANGELES CA 90048 5193 Make check payable to Southern California Edison Thank you for paying promptly Payment Stub Please pay total amount now due: Please detach and return payment stub with payment GLENDOSHA INVESTMENT, LLC $101,898.04 ATTN: Accounts Receivable PO Box 800 Rosemead, CA 91771-001 Document #7590309210 E:i E"DiSON Mi. f;DiSON INTHRNAflONAL C-l)mr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ondor Drive 1.2 LEAD AGENCY NAME AND ADDRESS City of Moorpark Community Development Department 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark, CA 93021 1.3 CONTACT PERSON AND PHNE NUMBER Freddy A. Carrillo , Associate Planner II City of Moorpark (805) 517-6224 fcarrillo@moorparkca.gov 1.4 PROJECT SPONSOR'S NAME AND ADDRESS Paul Minoa 4M Investment Corporation 6222 Wilshire Boulevard Suite 270 Los Angeles, CA 90048 paul@4minvestment.com 1.5 APPLICATION NUMBER . Industrial Planned Development No. 2019 -01 Conditional Use Permit No . 2020-02 JA NICE S PARVl N Mayor CHRlS E EG RE N Counc ilrne mbe r ROS EA N MIKOS , Ph.D. Co un c ilm e mbe r DA VID POLLOCK Coun c ilrn e mbe r KE 'SIMONS Councilme mb e r 52 CEQA Compliance and Exemption Determination 5850 Condor Drive Page 2 1.6 PROJECT LOCATION AND SETTING 5850 Condor Drive Assessor's Parcel Numbers (APN): 5130060315, 5130060175 , and 5130060185 General Plan Designations: Light lndustria·I (1-1) and Freeway/ Right -of-Way (Frwy -R/W) Zoning: Light Industrial (M-1) The 3.46-acre project site is located on the southwest corner of Princeton Avenue and Condor Drive. The site consists of two undeveloped lots and one paved lot immediately adjacent to the public right-of-way . Surrounding land uses are primarily industrial buildings , single-family dwellings , and a school. 1.7 PROPOSED PROJECT On November 13, 2019 , Paul Minoo (for 4M Investment Corporation) filed an application for an Industrial Planned Development (IPD) and Conditional Use Permit (CUP) to develop a 48 ,787 square-foot, single-story industrial building and associated site improvements on an undeveloped 3.46-acre site at 5850 Condor Drive. 53 CEQA Compliance and Exemption Determination 5850 Condor Drive Page 3 2.0 CEQA DETERMINATION 15332. In-Fill Development Projects. Yes X No □ 15332 (a) The project is consistent with the applicable general plan desgination and all applicable general plan policies as well as with applicable zoning designation and regulations. The General Plan (GP) land use designation for the project site is Light Industrial (1-1) and Freeway/ Right-of Way (Frwy-R/W). The 1-1 land use designation is intended to provide for a variety of industrial uses within the City. Suitable uses include light industrial service, technical research and business office use in a business park context. The Frwy-R/W designation identifies the existing right-of-way and portions of future right-of-way for the SR-118 and SR-23 freeways. The Zoning designation for the project site is Industrial Park (M-1) Zone. The purpose of this zone is to provide suitable areas for the exclusive development of light industrial service, technical research and related business office uses in an industrial park contect, in conjunction with strigent standards of building design, noise, landscaping and performance. Staff has reviewed the proposed project for compliance and has determined that all applicable standards have been met (see Table 1 below) A. Floor Area Ratio, Maximum of 0.38 0.32 Yes maximum (the ratio of gross floor area to the gross project site) B. Lot Area (in 10,000 150,948 Yes square feet) C. Front yard 20, except when 101 feet Yes setback (in feet) next to or across the street from R zone, then 30 D. Interior side yard 5 except when next 34 feet Yes setback (in feet) to R zone, then by permit E. Street side yard 5 except when next 35 feet Yes 54 CEQA Compliance and Exemption Determination 5850 Condor Drive Page 4 setback (in feet) to R zone, then by permit F. Rear yard 10 unless next to C 34 feet Yes setback (in feet) or M Zone, then 0 Building and Maximum of 30 feet 41 feet Yes, with an structure height, approved CUP maximum* (in feet) (*): Height may be increased (to maximum 60 feet) with approval of a CUP. Yes X Yes X Yes X No □ No □ No □ Conclusion The General Plan land use designation for the overall project site is 1-1 with the southwest corner featuring the land use designation of Frwy- RM/. Landscaping and paving is proposed on the Frwy-RM/ proportion of the project site and this land use designation will be changed to be consistent with the adjacent 1-1 designation during the General Plan update. Therefore, the project is consistent with this requirement. 15332 (b) The proposed development occurs within city limits on a project site of no more than five acres substantially surrounded by urban uses. The project site is 3.46 acres (150,948.91 square-feet) and is substantially surrounded by urban uses, including a one-story industrial building with surface parking to the north; school to the southeastern side; and a two-story industrial building and single-family homes to the southwestern side of the project site. Therefore, the project is consistent with this requirement. 15332 (c) The project site has no value as habitat for endangered, rare, or threatened species. The project site is currently undeveloped with trees and vegetation and is substantially surrounded by urban uses, including a one-story industrial building with surface parking to the north; school to the southeastern side; and a two-story industrial building and single-family homes to the southwestern side of the project site. No unique conditions have been observed on the subject property, therefore, the project is consistent with this requirement. 15332 (d) Approval of the project would not result in any significant 55 CEQA Compliance and Exemption Determination 5850 Condor Drive Page 5 effects relating to traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality. Traffic: The applicant submitted a Focused Traffic Analysis prepared by Ganddini Group, Inc., dated October 2, 2019. The purpose of this study is to provide an assessment of traffic operations resulting from development of the proposed project and to identify measures necessary to identify and mitigate any potential significant traffic impacts. The Traffic Analysis modeled existing traffic and proposed traffic volumes, the level of service (LOS) of, the peak hour signal warrant, and queue length analyses at the intersections, and determined that the project would not result in any significant impacts during the AM and PM peak hours at the Intersections of Princeton Avenue at Condor Drive and Avenida Colonia at Condor Drive. The intersection is forecast to continue operating at deficient LOS (D/F) with the addition of project- generated trips; all other movements are forecast to continue operating within acceptable LOS (C or better) during peak hours. The addition of the project does not reduce the LOS beyond the existing coditions. As a result, the proposed conditon is consistnent with the General Plan Circulation Element Goal and Policy below: GOAL 2: Provide a circulation system which supports existing, approved and planned land uses throughout the City while maintaining a desired LOS on all streets and at all intersections. Police 2.1: Level of service "C" shall be the system performance objective for traffic volumes on the circulation system. For roadways and interchanges already operating at less than level of service "C", the system performance objective shall be maintain or improve the current level of service. Therefore, the proposed project will have no impact on traffic. Noise: Construction activities would generate ambient noise levels in the vicinity of the project from active construction equipment, haul trucks, and construction worker vehicles. However, all noise sources would be temporary and would cease once construction is completed. All construction activities would be required to comply with the City Noise Ordinance, which allows construction to occur between 7 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. Monday through Saturday. Therefore, the proposed project will have no impact on noise levels. 56 CEQA Compliance and Exemption Determination 5850 Condor Drive Page 6 Yes No X D Air Quality: Short-term impacts to air quality will likely result from grading and other construction activities associated with the project (e.g., earth-moving and heavy equipment vehicle operations). However, impacts would be temporary and would cease once construction is completed. In addition, the applicant is responsible for complying with all permitting and operational requirements of the Ventura County Air Pollution Control District (VCAPCD). Therefore, the proposed project will have no impact on air quality. Water Quality: Ventura County Waterworks District No. 1 is the agency responsible for providing water to the city. Approximately 75 percent of the water supplied to the district comes from the Calleguas Municipal Water District and the remaining 25 percent comes from local groundwater supplies. Uniformly applied conditions of approval for new development will require the provision of a "Will Serve" letter from both the Ventura County Waterworks District No. 1. Therefore, the proposed project will have no impact on water quality. Conclusion: The proposed project would not result in any significant impacts related to traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality. Therefore, the project is consistent with this requirement. 15332 (e) The site can be adequately served by all required utilities and public services. In order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times, or other performance objectives provided by public services, the applicant will be responsible to pay development fees for public services. As a result, the project is consistent with this requirement. 57 CEQA Compliance and Exemption Determination 5850 Condor Drive Page 7 CEQA DETERMINATION Based on an examination of the project, supporting information, and analysis contained herein , the project is found to be exempt from further CEQA review pursuant to Section 15332 (In-Fill Development Projects) of the CEQA Guidelines. Signatur : Freddy A. Carrillo , Associate Planner II Date Source Documents: 1. Focused Traffic Analysis prepared by Ganddini Group, Inc (October 2, 2019) 58 Trac Engineering Transportaon Planning Parking Noise & Vibraon Air Quality Global Climate Change Health Risk Assessment 5850 CONDOR DRIVE FOCUSED TRAFFIC ANALYSIS City of Moorpark October 2, 2019 59 <UNHIDDEN> 5850 CONDOR DRIVE FOCUSED TRAFFIC ANALYSIS City of Moorpark October 2, 2019 prepared by Perrie Ilercil, PE (AZ) Giancarlo Ganddini, TE, PTP GANDDINI GROUP, INC. 550 Parkcenter Drive, Suite 202 Santa Ana, CA 92705 (714) 795-3100 | www.ganddini.com 19-0186 60 5850 Condor Drive Focused Traffic Analysis i 19-0186 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1. INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................................................... 1 Purpose and Objectives ................................................................................................................................................. 1 Project Description .......................................................................................................................................................... 1 Study Area ......................................................................................................................................................................... 1 Analysis Scenarios ........................................................................................................................................................... 1 2. METHODOLOGY ................................................................................................................................................... 4 Intersection Delay Methodology ................................................................................................................................. 4 Performance Standards .................................................................................................................................................. 5 Threshold of Significance .............................................................................................................................................. 5 3. EXISTING CONDITIONS ...................................................................................................................................... 6 Existing Roadway System .............................................................................................................................................. 6 Pedestrian Facilities ......................................................................................................................................................... 6 Transit Facilities ................................................................................................................................................................ 6 General Plan Context ..................................................................................................................................................... 6 Existing Roadway Volume ............................................................................................................................................. 6 Existing Intersection Level of Service......................................................................................................................... 7 4. PROJECT TRIP GENERATION/DISTRIBUTION .......................................................................................... 15 Project Trip Generation .............................................................................................................................................. 15 Project Distribution ...................................................................................................................................................... 15 Project Design Features .............................................................................................................................................. 15 5. FUTURE CONDITIONS ...................................................................................................................................... 22 Existing Plus Project Volumes ................................................................................................................................... 22 Intersection Levels of Service ................................................................................................................................... 22 Traffic Signal Warrant Analysis ................................................................................................................................. 22 Queueing Analysis ........................................................................................................................................................ 22 Significant Impact Evaluation..................................................................................................................................... 23 6. CONCLUSIONS .................................................................................................................................................... 28 Mitigation Measures .................................................................................................................................................... 28 General Recommendations ........................................................................................................................................ 28 APPENDICES Appendix A Glossary Appendix B Scoping Agreement Appendix C General Plan Circulation Element Figures Appendix D Intersection Turning Movement Count Worksheets Appendix E Intersection Level of Service Worksheets Appendix F Traffic Signal Warrant Worksheets Draft61 5850 Condor Drive Focused Traffic Analysis ii 19-0186 LIST OF TABLES Table 1. Existing Intersection Levels of Service ........................................................................................................... 8 Table 2. Project Trip Generation ................................................................................................................................... 16 Table 3. Existing Plus Project Intersection Levels of Service ................................................................................ 26 Table 4. Westbound Vehicle Queue at Princeton Avenue/Condor Drive ........................................................ 27 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1. Project Location Map .......................................................................................................................................... 2 Figure 2. Site Plan .................................................................................................................................................................. 3 Figure 3. Existing Lane Geometry and Intersection Traffic Controls ....................................................................... 9 Figure 4. Existing Pedestrian Facilities .......................................................................................................................... 10 Figure 5. City Transit Routes ........................................................................................................................................... 11 Figure 6. Existing Average Daily Traffic Volumes ...................................................................................................... 12 Figure 7. Existing AM Peak Hour Intersection Turning Movement Volumes ..................................................... 13 Figure 8. Existing PM Peak Hour Intersection Turning Movement Volumes ..................................................... 14 Figure 9. Project Trip Distribution (Cars) ...................................................................................................................... 17 Figure 10. Project Trip Distribution (Trucks) .................................................................................................................. 18 Figure 11. Project Average Daily Traffic Volumes ....................................................................................................... 19 Figure 12. Project AM Peak Hour Intersection Turning Movement Volumes ...................................................... 20 Figure 13. Project PM Peak Hour Intersection Turning Movement Volumes ...................................................... 21 Figure 14. Existing Plus Project AM Peak Hour Intersection Turning Movement Volumes ............................. 24 Figure 15. Existing Plus Project PM Peak Hour Intersection Turning Movement Volumes .............................. 25 Draft62 5850 Condor Drive Focused Traffic Analysis ES-1 19-0186 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY PROJECT DESCRIPTION The 3.465-acre project site is located at 5850 Condor Drive in the City of Moorpark. The project site is currently undeveloped. The proposed project consists of developing the project site with a 48,211 square foot new industrial building with 115 stalls of vehicle parking and 10 bicycle parking. The proposed project will provide two full access driveways on Condor Drive. EXISTING CONDITIONS The study intersections currently operate within acceptable Levels of Service (C or better) during the peak hours for Existing conditions, with the exception of the following study intersection (see Table 1):  Princeton Avenue at Condor Drive - #1 (AM peak hour - LOS D, PM peak hour - LOS F) Since the intersection of Princeton Avenue at Condor Drive is one-way stop controlled, the Level of Service is based on the movement with the worst (highest) delay value, or in this case the westbound left-turn movement. The uncontrolled through movements along Princeton Avenue are free-flow and operate at Level of Service A. The westbound right-turn lane currently operates at Level of Service C or better during the AM and PM peak hours. PROJECT TRIPS The proposed project is forecast to generate approximately 239 daily vehicle trips, including 34 vehicle trips during the AM peak hour and 30 vehicle trips during the PM peak hour. In Passenger Car Equivalent (PCE) trips, the project is forecast to generate approximately 287 daily PCE trips, including 41 PCE trips during the AM peak hour and 36 PCE trips during the PM peak hour (see Table 2). FORECAST CONDITIONS The westbound left-turn movement at the intersection of Princeton Avenue at Condor Drive is forecast to continue operating at deficient Levels of Service (D/F) with the addition of project-generated trips; all other movements are forecast to continue operating within acceptable Levels of Service (C or better) during the peak hours. The unsignalized study intersection of Princeton Avenue at Condor Drive does not satisfy the California MUTCD peak hour volume warrant (Warrant 3) for Existing or Existing Plus Project conditions. Based on the results of the Level of Service, peak hour signal warrant, and queue length analyses, the proposed project is forecast to result in no significant impacts at the study intersections for Existing Plus Project conditions during the AM and PM peak hours. MITIGATION MEASURES No off-site mitigation measure improvements were identified since the proposed project is forecast to result in no significant traffic impacts at the study intersections for the scenarios analyzed. Draft63 5850 Condor Drive Focused Traffic Analysis 1 19-0186 1. INTRODUCTION This section describes the purpose of this traffic impact analysis, project location, proposed development, and study area. Figure 1 shows the project location map and Figure 2 illustrates the project site plan. PURPOSE AND OBJECTIVES The purpose of this study is to provide an assessment of traffic operations resulting from development of the proposed project and to identify measures necessary to mitigate potentially significant traffic impacts as requested in the pre-application review letter dated October 10, 2018 from the City of Moorpark. This report summarizes our methodology, analysis, and findings. Although this is a technical report, effort has been made to write the report clearly and concisely. A glossary is provided within Appendix A to assist the reader with terms related to transportation planning. PROJECT DESCRIPTION Figure 1 shows the project location map. The 3.465-acre project site is located at 5850 Condor Drive in the City of Moorpark. The project site is currently undeveloped. The site plan is illustrated on Figure 2. The proposed project consists of developing the project site with a 48,211 square foot new industrial building with 115 stalls of vehicle parking and 10 bicycle parking. The proposed project will provide two full access driveways on Condor Drive. STUDY AREA The study area and other parameters of the analysis were identified based on scoping input from City of Moorpark staff (see Appendix B). The study area consists of the following study intersections and project driveways: Study Intersections Jurisdiction 1. Princeton Avenue (NS) at Condor Drive (EW) Moorpark 2. Avenida Colonia (NS) at Condor Drive (EW) Moorpark ANALYSIS SCENARIOS This study evaluates the following analysis scenarios for typical weekday AM and PM peak hour conditions:  Existing  Existing Plus Project 1Draft 64 2DraftLegend . 0 Study Intersection Figure 1 Project Location Map Drive Pro ject 5850 Co ndo; ffic Analys is Foc use d ra l 9 -01 86 65 3DraftV IE-,-, .. ,, r rl ~ :~~~MJli.wr I (U)CAliONJIJl'P,_I I I I / I I 1/11 1/ Figure 2 Site Plan 5850 Co ndor D rive Project Foc use d Traffic Analys is 19 -01 86 66 5850 Condor Drive Focused Traffic Analysis 4 19-0186 2. METHODOLOGY This section describes the analysis methodologies used to assess transportation facility performance as adopted by the respective jurisdictional agencies. Analysis of signalized intersections within the City of Moorpark is based on the Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) methodology. Since both study intersections are unsignalized, performance of the unsignalized study intersections was assessed using the intersection delay methodology based on the procedures contained in the Highway Capacity Manual (Transportation Research Board, 6th Edition) [“HCM”]. INTERSECTION DELAY METHODOLOGY The HCM intersection delay methodology considers the traffic volume and distribution of movements, traffic composition, geometric characteristics, and gap times/signalization details (as applicable) to calculate the average control delay per vehicle and corresponding Level of Service. Control delay is defined as the portion of delay attributed to the intersection traffic control (such as a traffic signal or stop sign) and includes initial deceleration, queue move-up time, stopped delay, and final acceleration delay. The intersection control delay is then correlated to Level of Service based on the following thresholds: Level of Service Intersection Control Delay (Seconds / Vehicle) Description Signalized Intersection Unsignalized Intersection A ≤ 10.0 ≤ 10.0 EXCELLENT OPERATION. All approaches to the intersection appear quite open, turning movements are easily made and nearly all drivers find freedom of operation. B > 10.0 to ≤ 20.0 > 10.0 to ≤ 15.0 VERY GOOD OPERATION: Many drivers begin to feel somewhat restricted within platoons of vehicles. This represents stable flow. An approach to an intersection may occasionally be fully utilized and traffic queues start to form. C > 20.0 to ≤ 35.0 > 15.0 to ≤ 25.0 GOOD OPERATION. Occasionally backups may develop behind turning vehicles. Most drivers feel somewhat restricted. D > 35.0 to ≤ 55.0 > 25.0 to ≤ 35.0 FAIR OPERATION. There are no long-standing traffic queues. This level is typically associated with design practice for peak periods. E > 55.0 to ≤ 80.0 > 35.0 to ≤ 50.0 POOR OPERATION. Some long-standing vehicular queues develop on critical approaches. F > 80.0 > 50.0 FORCED FLOW. Represents jammed conditions. Backups from locations downstream or on the cross street may restrict or prevent movements of vehicles out of the intersection approach lanes; therefore, volumes carried are not predictable. Potential for stop-and-go type traffic flow. Source: Transportation Research Board, Highway Capacity Manual (6th Edition). 4Draft 67 5850 Condor Drive Focused Traffic Analysis 5 19-0186 Level of Service is used to qualitatively describe the performance of a roadway facility, ranging from Level of Service A (free-flow conditions) to Level of Service F (extreme congestion and system failure). At intersections with traffic signal or all way stop control, Level of Service is determined by the average control delay for the overall intersection. At intersections with cross street stop control (i.e., one- or two-way stop control), Level of Service is determined by the average control delay for the worst individual movement (or movements sharing a single lane). The intersection delay analysis was performed using the Vistro software and default values recommended in the HCM. PERFORMANCE STANDARDS The City of Moorpark has established a minimum acceptable Level of Service C for peak hour intersection operations. THRESHOLD OF SIGNIFICANCE Many jurisdictions in the region, including the City of Moorpark do not have established significant impact thresholds for unsignalized intersections. For this traffic impact analysis, a project impact at an unsignalized intersection is considered significant if the addition of project-generated trips is forecast to cause or worsen Level of Service D, E or F and a peak hour traffic signal warrant is satisfied (per California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices). If a project is forecast to cause a significant impact, feasible mitigation measures that will reduce the impact to a less than significant level will be identified. Mitigation measures can be in many forms, including the addition of lanes, traffic control modification, or demand management measures. If no feasible mitigation measures can be identified for a significantly impacted facility, the impact will remain significant and unavoidable and a statement of overriding considerations will be required. 5Draft 68 5850 Condor Drive Focused Traffic Analysis 6 19-0186 3. EXISTING CONDITIONS EXISTING ROADWAY SYSTEM Figure 3 identifies the lane geometry and intersection traffic controls for Existing conditions based on a field survey of the study area. The key north-south roadway providing local circulation is Princeton Avenue. The key east-west roadway providing local circulation is Condor Drive. Princeton Avenue is a two-lane undivided to four-lane divided roadway in the study area. North of Condor Drive, Princeton Avenue is a four-lane roadway with a raised median and intermittent left turn lanes. South/west of Condo, Princeton Avenue is a two-lane undivided roadway. Princeton Avenue is classified as a Rural Collector (2-4 lanes divided roadway with 54-64 feet of pavement width) in the City of Moorpark General Plan. On-street parking is prohibited in the project vicinity. Princeton Avenue is indicated as a Class III Bike Route (indicated by signs only) in the City of Moorpark General Plan. A dedicated on-street bicycle lane is provided north of Condor Drive on the eastside of the roadway. Sidewalks are provided on both sides of the roadway north of Condor Drive and on the west side of the roadway south of Condor Drive. The posted speed limit of 40 miles per hour north of Condor Drive and 35 miles per hour south of Condor Drive; the advisory speed is reduced to 30 miles per hour through the curve at the intersection of Condor Drive. The Princeton Avenue Improvement Project will improve 4,000 feet of roadway from Condor Drive to the Sharma Construction property. The improvements include roadway widening from 28 to 54 feet to provide standard width lanes, a continuous left turn lane median, bike lanes, sidewalks, landscaped parkways, drainage improvements, street lights, and screening/retaining walls where necessary. Condor Drive is a two-lane undivided roadway in the study area. Condor Drive is an unclassified roadway in the City of Moorpark General Plan. On-street parking is prohibited on both sides of the roadway in the study area. Dedicated on-street bicycle lanes are not provided in the study area. Sidewalks are generally provided on both sides of the roadway. The posted speed limit is 25 miles per hour. PEDESTRIAN FACILITIES Existing pedestrian facilities in the project vicinity are shown on Figure 4. As shown on Figure 4, a pedestrian sidewalk is currently provided along the project site west frontage. TRANSIT FACILITIES Figure 5 shows the existing transit routes available in the project vicinity. As shown in Figure 5, the study area is currently served by Route 1 and 2 along Princeton Avenue. GENERAL PLAN CONTEXT The City of Moorpark General Plan Circulation Element roadway classifications map and standard roadways cross-section figure show the nature and extent of arterial and collector highways that are needed to adequately serve the ultimate development depicted by the Land Use Element of the General Plan. Additionally, the City of Moorpark General Plan Bike Route shows existing and proposed bike routes and classifications. The City of Moorpark General Plan Circulation Map, standard Roadway Cross-sections and Bike Routes are included in Appendix C. EXISTING ROADWAY VOLUME Figure 6 shows the Existing average daily traffic volumes. The Existing average daily traffic volumes have been factored from peak hour intersection turning movement volumes using the following formula for each intersection leg: 6Draft 69 5850 Condor Drive Focused Traffic Analysis 7 19-0186 Evening Peak Hour (Approach Volume + Exit Volume) x 10 = Leg Volume. Existing peak hour intersection turning movement volumes are based upon AM peak period and PM peak period intersection turning movement counts obtained in September 2019 during typical weekday conditions. The AM peak period was counted between 7:00 AM and 9:00 AM and the PM peak period was counted between 4:00 PM and 6:00 PM. The actual peak hour within the peak period is the four consecutive 15- minute periods with the highest total volume when all movements are added together. Thus, the weekday PM peak hour at one intersection may be 4:45 PM to 5:45 PM if the four consecutive 15-minute periods have the highest combined volume. Intersection turning movement count worksheets are provided in Appendix D. Figure 7 and Figure 8 show the Existing AM peak hour and PM peak hour intersection turning movement volumes, respectively. EXISTING INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE The study intersection Levels of Service for Existing conditions have been calculated and are shown in Table 1. Level of Service calculation worksheets are provided in Appendix E. As shown in Table 1, the study intersections currently operate within acceptable Levels of Service (C or better) during the peak hours for Existing conditions, with the exception of the following study intersection:  Princeton Avenue at Condor Drive - #1 (AM peak hour - LOS D, PM peak hour - LOS F) Since the intersection of Princeton Avenue at Condor Drive is one-way stop controlled, the Level of Service is based on the movement with the worst (highest) delay value, or in this case the westbound left-turn movement. The uncontrolled through movements along Princeton Avenue are free-flow and operate at Level of Service A. The westbound right-turn lane currently operates at Level of Service C or better during the AM and PM peak hours. 7Draft 70 Delay2 LOS3 Delay2 LOS3 1. Princeton Ave at Condor Drive 0.61 A 1.62 A 1.   ‐ Worst Movement (Westbound Left)31.1 D 58.8 F 2. Avenida Colonia at Condor Drive CSS 9.1 A 8.8 A Notes: (1) (2) (3) Delay is shown in seconds per vehicle. For intersections with cross street stop control, LOS is based on average delay of the worst individual  lane (or movements sharing a lane). LOS = Level of Service Table 1 Existing Intersection Levels of Service AM Peak Hour PM Peak HourTraffic  Control1Study IntersectionID CSS = Cross Street Stop CSS    5850 Cordor Drive Focused Traffic Analysis 19‐01868Draftg:i,~::Jii 71 9DraftLegend ,:;. Stop Sig~ ided Roadway #D #-Lane D1vd ' 'ded Roadway #U #-Lane Un 1v1 + Existing La~eht Turn Lane d De Facto Rig gJ,~~ii Figure 3 . Traffic Controls d Intersection Geometry an o,;" Pm ject E xisting lane 58 50 Coo ddo;raffic Analys is Foc use l 9 -01 86 72 10DraftLegend -Sidewalk €) Bus Stop Figure 4 Existing Pedestrian Facilities 5850 Condor Drive Project Focused Traffic Analys is 19-0186 73 11Draft-Av Source: City of Moorpark 9:1,~::lii Poindexter ~ ~. 2=rral j j ' School Lassen Ave Flo i ~ l.os~A, j. iTreRafldl ~ , Q at Moapark V..1age Cres1 Wateratooe al Pa11<& nte Senio'Apls Mo::<pa,1< Campus .. ,,,,;q,I>_ .Canyon (7>'~ g:~~s ,ir-t School ~'1-l Moorpark College C)omp,,sParl<Dr © ©\ ) t (Ct~ J'{i:, 'fMf,§~ / aCollegerkView •~pus I! f / .f/ ":ll' Par -------....:a.-,q;:;:_.,.Y'-/.:~ I "'-"••· ... ",;,;,;_:_-.,, ~ . "'3/oo,'•· .. ~~2~~ LEGEND -Roulel • RootelStop Roule 2 Q Rou!B 2 S\Oll Route2:Tnps1, 7, 10 © Com~nalionSiops SYMBOLS ~PoslOffice Figure 5 City of Moorpark Transit Route Map 5850 Condor Drive Project Focused T raffle Analysis 19-0186 74 12DraftLegend . Per Day (1,000's) •## Vehicles Figure 6 Daily Traffic Volumes . . Average . Existing do, o,;" PmJect 5850 Con T ffic Anal ys is Focused ra l 9-0186 75 13DraftLegend . 0 Study Intersection Figure 7 ement Volumes . Turning Mov Intersection o,;" Pmject . AM Peak Hour 5850 Coodo; me Aoa lys ;s Existing Fowsed " 1'-0186 76 14DraftLegend . 0 Study Intersection Figure 8 ement Volumes . Turning Mov Intersection o,;" Pmject . • PM Peak Hour 5850 Coodo; me Aoa lys ;s Ex1st1ng Fowsed " l 0-0186 77 5850 Condor Drive Focused Traffic Analysis 15 19-0186 4. PROJECT TRIP GENERATION/DISTRIBUTION This section describes how project trip generation, trip distribution, and trip assignment forecasts were developed. The forecast project volumes are illustrated on figures contained in this section. PROJECT TRIP GENERATION Table 2 shows the project trip generation based upon rates obtained from the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual (10th Edition, 2017). The project trips have been categorized into passenger cars and trucks based on truck trip data contained in the ITE Trip Generation Handbook (3rd Edition, 2017). Additionally, the project generated truck trips have been converted to Passenger Car Equivalent (PCE) trips based on a PCE factor of 2.0 for trucks. As shown in Table 2, the proposed project is forecast to generate approximately 239 daily vehicle trips, including 34 vehicle trips during the AM peak hour and 30 vehicle trips during the PM peak hour. As also shown in Table 2, the project is forecast to generate approximately 287 daily PCE trips, including 41 PCE trips during the AM peak hour and 36 PCE trips during the PM peak hour. PROJECT DISTRIBUTION Figure 9 and Figure 10 illustrate the forecast directional distribution patterns of the project generated passenger car and truck trips. Passenger car trips are generally more localized with residential or commercial origin/destination points, whereas truck trips generally have a more regional distribution travelling to/from other industrial uses or ports/terminals via the freeway. The project trip distribution patterns are based on review of existing volume data, surrounding land uses, designated truck routes, and the local and regional roadway facilities in the project vicinity. Based on the identified project trip generation and distributions, project average daily traffic volumes have been calculated and shown on Figure 11. The project AM and PM peak hour intersection turning movement volumes for project opening year (2021) conditions are depicted on Figure 12 and Figure 13. PROJECT DESIGN FEATURES In accordance with standard conditions of approval, this analysis assumes the following improvements will be constructed by the project to provide project site access:  The proposed project will provide roadway, sidewalk, signing, striping, lighting, curb/gutter and landscaping improvements to the ultimate half-section width of adjacent roadways along the property frontage.  The proposed project will provide two full access driveways at Condor Drive in accordance with applicable City of Moorpark standard plans. 15Draft 78 Source1 % In % Out Total % In % Out Total Daily ITE 110 88% 12% 0.70 13% 87% 0.63 4.96 Quantity (TSF)In Out Total In Out Total Daily Light Industrial 48.211 Cars (80%)24 3 27 3 21 24 191 Trucks (20%)3 61715648 TOTAL VEHICLE TRIPS GENERATED 30 4 34 4 26 30 239 Quantity (TSF)In Out Total In Out Total Daily Light Industrial 48.211 Cars 24 3 27 3 21 24 191 Trucks (PCE Factor = 2.0)12 2 14 2 10 12 96 TOTAL PCE TRIPS GENERATED 36 5 41 5 31 36 287 Notes: (1) (2)TSF = Thousand Square Feet (3) AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Land Use/Vehicle Type ITE = Institute of Transportation Engineers, Trip Generation Manual (10th Edition, 2017); ### = Land Use Code. Per ITE Trip Generation Handbook (3rd Edition, 2017), average truck trips for industrial park uses is approximately 13 percent. The percent of  trucks for this analysis is rounded up to 20% to provide a conservative analysis. Passenger Car Equivalent (PCE) Trips Generated Table 2 Project Trip Generation Trip Generation Rates per TSF2 AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Land Use/Vehicle Type Light Industrial Vehicle Trips Generated AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Land Use/Vehicle Type  5850 Cordor Drive Focused Traffic Analysis 19‐018616Draftg:i,j::Jii 79 17Draft· ct Legend t From/To ProJe ..._10% Percen Figure 9 . t· n _ Cars T ·p Distribu 10 p ject ri ro Dri ve Project 5850 Condo; ffic Anal ys is Fo cused ra l 9-0186 80 18Draft· ct Legend t From/To ProJe ..._10% Percen Figure 10 . -Trucks . t Trip Distribution ProJec o,;" Pmject 5850 Condo; ffic Anal ys is Fo cused ra l 9-0186 81 19DraftLegend . Per Day (1,000's) •## Vehicles Figure 11 Daily Traffic Volumes Project Average d o,;" Pmject 5850 Con o; ffic Anal ys is Focused ra l 9-0186 82 20DraftLegend . 0 Study Intersection Figure 12 ement Volumes . Turning Mov Intersection o,;" Pmject . t AM Peak Hour 5850 Coo~o;camc Aoa lys ;, Pro Jee Fow se l 0-0186 83 21DraftLegend . 0 Study Intersection Figure 13 ement Volumes . Turning Mov Intersection o,;" Pmject . t PM Peak Hour 5850 Coo~o;camc Aoa lys ;, ProJec Fow se l 0-0186 84 5850 Condor Drive Focused Traffic Analysis 22 19-0186 5. FUTURE CONDITIONS This section presents traffic volume and operational forecasts for future conditions with the proposed project. Forecast study area volumes are illustrated on figures contained in this section. Detailed intersection Level of Service calculation worksheets are provided in Appendix E. EXISTING PLUS PROJECT VOLUMES The roadway volumes for Existing Plus Project conditions were developed by adding the project-generated trips to existing traffic volumes. Existing Plus Project AM and PM peak hour intersection turning movement volumes are shown on Figure 14 and Figure 15. INTERSECTION LEVELS OF SERVICE The intersection Levels of Service for Existing Plus Project conditions are shown in Table 3. As shown Table 3, the study intersections are projected to operate within acceptable Levels of Service (C or better) during the peak hours for Existing Plus Project conditions, with the exception of the following study intersection that is forecast to continue operating at deficient Levels of Service.  Princeton Avenue at Condor Drive - #1 (AM peak hour - LOS D, PM peak hour - LOS F) Since the intersection of Princeton Avenue at Condor Drive is one-way stop controlled, the Level of Service is based on the movement with the worst (highest) delay value, or in this case the westbound left-turn movement. The westbound right-turn lane currently operates at Level of Service C or better during the AM and PM peak hours. The uncontrolled through movements along Princeton Avenue are free-flow and operate at Level of Service A. TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANT ANALYSIS The potential need for installation of a traffic signal at the deficient unsignalized study intersection was evaluated based on the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (“California MUTCD”, November 2014), Section 4C-101, peak hour volume warrant (Warrant 3). Traffic signal warrant worksheets are provided in Appendix F. The unsignalized study intersection of Princeton Avenue at Condor Drive does not satisfy the California MUTCD peak hour volume warrant (Warrant 3) for Existing or Existing Plus Project conditions. QUEUEING ANALYSIS Table 4 summarizes the 95th-percentile queue lengths for westbound movements at the intersection of Princeton Avenue and Condor Drive. Vehicle queues were evaluated based on the HCM back-of-queue methodology (see Level of Service worksheets in Appendix E). As shown in Table 4, the calculated queue length for the westbound left turn movement is currently 40 feet without the proposed project, which represents a typical queue of one to two vehicles. With the addition of project-generated trips (i.e., Existing Plus Project conditions), the calculated queue length for the westbound left turn movement is approximately 50 feet, which represents a typical queue of two vehicles. Therefore, the proposed project is forecast to result in a nominal impact on vehicle queues for the deficient westbound left turn movement. Additionally, the distance on Condor Drive between Princeton Avenue and Avenida Colonia is approximately 55 feet. Therefore, the vehicle queues for the westbound approach Condor Drive at Princeton Avenue can 22Draft 85 5850 Condor Drive Focused Traffic Analysis 23 19-0186 be accommodated within the available stacking distance without obstructing vehicular movements at the adjacent intersection of Avenida Colonia and Condor Drive. SIGNIFICANT IMPACT EVALUATION The intersection of Princeton Avenue at Condor Drive currently operates at deficient Levels of Service (D/F) during the AM and PM peak hours based on the westbound left-turn movement only. The westbound left-turn movement at the intersection of Princeton Avenue at Condor Drive is forecast to continue operating at deficient Levels of Service (D/F) with the addition of project-generated trips; all other movements are forecast to continue operating within acceptable Levels of Service (C or better) during the peak hours. Although the intersection of Princeton Avenue at Condor Drive is forecast to continue operating deficient Levels of Service during the peak hours, the project-related impact is considered less than significant since the peak hour traffic signal warrant is not satisfied. Based on the results of the Level of Service, peak hour signal warrant, and queue length analyses, the proposed project is forecast to result in no significant impacts at the study intersections for Existing Plus Project conditions during the AM and PM peak hours. 23Draft 86 Delay2 LOS3 Delay2 LOS3 Delay2 LOS3 Delay2 LOS3 1 Princeton Ave at Condor Drive 0.61 A 1.62 A 0.86 A 2.29 A 1.   ‐ Worst Movement (Westbound Left)31.1 D 58.8 F 34.6 D 66.8 F 2. Avenida Colonia at Condor Drive CSS 9.1 A 8.8 A 9.3 A 8.9 A 3. West Project Access at Condor Drive CSS ‐‐9.2 A 9.2 A 4. East Project Access at Condor Drive CSS ‐‐9.2 A 9.1 A Notes: (1) CSS = Cross Street Stop (2) (3) LOS = Level of Service Study IntersectionID Delay is shown in seconds per vehicle. For intersections with cross street stop control, LOS is based on average delay of the worst  individual lane (or movements sharing a lane). Table 3 Existing Plus Project Intersection Levels of Service  Existing Existing Plus Project AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Traffic  Control1 CSS    5850 Cordor Drive Focused Traffic Analysis 19‐018624Draftg:i,~::Jii 87 Storage Length ID Approach Lane (Feet)1 AM PM AM PM Existing Plus Project 1. Princeton Ave at Condor Drive Westbound Left 55 <20 40 <20 50 YES YES Westbound Right 55 <20 <20 <20 <20 YES YES Notes: (1) (2) Queueing length rounded up to the nearest 5 feet.  Intersection Distance between Princton Avenue and Avenida Colonia. Table 4 Westbound Vehicle Queues at Princeton Avenue/Condor Drive Peak Hour 95th‐Percentile Queue Length (Feet)2 Adequate Storage  Provided Existing Existing Plus Project    5850 Cordor Drive Focused Traffic Analysis 19‐018625Draft88 26DraftLegend . 0 Study Intersection Figure 14 ·ect . ting Plus ProJ Ex1s t Volumes . Movemen • Turning Intersection o,;" Pmject A M Peak Hour 5850 Coodo; me Aoa lys ;, Fo cused ra l 9-0186 89 27DraftLegend . 0 Study Intersection Figure 15 ·ect . ting Plus ProJ Ex1s t Volumes . Movemen • Turning Intersection o,;" Pmject P M Peak Hour 5850 Coodo; me Aoa lys ;, Fo cused ra l 9-0186 90 5850 Condor Drive Focused Traffic Analysis 28 19-0186 6. CONCLUSIONS MITIGATION MEASURES No off-site mitigation measure improvements were identified since the proposed project is forecast to result in no significant traffic impacts at the study intersections for the scenarios analyzed. GENERAL RECOMMENDATIONS On-site and site-adjacent improvements including project driveways, roadway design, traffic signing and striping, and traffic control improvements relating to the proposed project should be constructed in accordance with applicable engineering standards and to the satisfaction of the City of Moorpark engineering staff. Sight distance at project access points should comply with applicable City of Moorpark/California Department of Transportation sight distance standards. The final grading, landscaping, and street improvement plans should demonstrate that sight distance standards are met. Off-street parking should be provided to meet City of Moorpark Municipal Code requirements. As is the case for any roadway design, the City of Moorpark should periodically review traffic operations in the vicinity of the project once the project is constructed to assure that the traffic operations are satisfactory. 28Draft 91 5850 Condor Drive Focused Traffic Analysis 29 19-0186 APPENDICES Appendix A Glossary Appendix B Scoping Agreement Appendix C General Plan Circulation Element Figures Appendix D Intersection Turning Movement Count Worksheets Appendix E Intersection Level of Service Worksheets Appendix F Traffic Signal Warrant Worksheets Apx-1Draft 92 APPENDIX A GLOSSARY Apx-2Draft 93 GLOSSARY OF PARKING/TRANSPORTATION TERMS ACRONYMS AC Acres ADT Average Daily Traffic Caltrans California Department of Transportation DU Dwelling Unit ICU Intersection Capacity Utilization LOS Level of Service PCE Passenger Car Equivalent TSF Thousand Square Feet V/C Volume/Capacity VMT Vehicle Miles Traveled TERMS AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC: The average 24-hour volume for a stated period divided by the number of days in that period. For example, Annual Average Daily Traffic is the total volume during a year divided by 365 days. BANDWIDTH: The number of seconds of green time available for through traffic in a signal progression. BOTTLENECK: A point of constriction along a roadway that limits the amount of traffic that can proceed downstream from its location. CAPACITY: The maximum number of vehicles that can be reasonably expected to pass over a given section of a lane or a roadway in a given time period. CHANNELIZATION: The separation or regulation of conflicting traffic movements into definite paths of travel by the use of pavement markings, raised islands, or other suitable means to facilitate the safe and orderly movements of both vehicles and pedestrians. CLEARANCE INTERVAL: Nearly same as yellow time. If there is an all red interval after the end of a yellow, then that is also added into the clearance interval. CONTROL DELAY: The component of delay, typically expressed in seconds per vehicle, resulting from the type of traffic control at an intersection. Control delay is measured by comparison with the uncontrolled condition; it includes delay incurred by slowing down, stopping/waiting, and speeding up. CORDON: An imaginary line around an area across which vehicles, persons, or other items are counted (in and out). CORNER SIGHT DISTANCE: The minimum sight distance required by the driver of a vehicle to cross or enter the lanes of the major roadway without requiring approaching traffic travelling at a given speed to radically alter their speed or trajectory. Corner sight distance is measured from the driver’s eye at 42 inches above the pavement to an object height of 36 inches above the pavement in the center of the nearest approach lane. CYCLE LENGTH: The time period in seconds required for a traffic signal to complete one full cycle of indications. CUL-DE-SAC: A local street open at one end only and with special provisions for turning around. Apx-3Draft 94 DAILY CAPACITY: A theoretical value representing the daily traffic volume that will typically result in a peak hour volume equal to the capacity of the roadway. DELAY: The time consumed while traffic is impeded in its movement by some element over which it has no control, usually expressed in seconds per vehicle. DEMAND RESPONSIVE SIGNAL: Same as traffic-actuated signal. DENSITY: The number of vehicles occupying in a unit length of the through traffic lanes of a roadway at any given instant. Usually expressed in vehicles per mile. DETECTOR: A device that responds to a physical stimulus and transmits a resulting impulse to the signal controller. DESIGN SPEED: A speed selected for purposes of design. Features of a highway, such as curvature, superelevation, and sight distance (upon which the safe operation of vehicles is dependent) are correlated to design speed. DIRECTIONAL SPLIT: The percent of traffic in the peak direction at any point in time. DIVERSION: The rerouting of peak hour traffic to avoid congestion. FORCED FLOW: Opposite of free flow. FREE FLOW: Volumes are well below capacity. Vehicles can maneuver freely and travel is unimpeded by other traffic. GAP: Time or distance between successive vehicles in a traffic stream, rear bumper to front bumper. HEADWAY: Time or distance spacing between successive vehicles in a traffic stream, front bumper to front bumper. INTERCONNECTED SIGNAL SYSTEM: A number of intersections that are connected to achieve signal progression. LEVEL OF SERVICE: A qualitative measure of a number of factors, which include speed and travel time, traffic interruptions, freedom to maneuver, safety, driving comfort and convenience, and operating costs. LOOP DETECTOR: A vehicle detector consisting of a loop of wire embedded in the roadway, energized by alternating current and producing an output circuit closure when passed over by a vehicle. MINIMUM ACCEPTABLE GAP: Smallest time headway between successive vehicles in a traffic stream into which another vehicle is willing and able to cross or merge. MULTI-MODAL: More than one mode; such as automobile, bus transit, rail rapid transit, and bicycle transportation modes. OFFSET: The time interval in seconds between the beginning of green at one intersection and the beginning of green at an adjacent intersection. PLATOON: A closely grouped component of traffic that is composed of several vehicles moving, or standing ready to move, with clear spaces ahead and behind. Apx-4Draft 95 PASSENGER CAR EQUIVALENT (PCE): A metric used to assess the impact of larger vehicles, such as trucks, recreational vehicles, and buses, by converting the traffic volume of larger vehicles to an equivalent number of passenger cars. PEAK HOUR: The 60 consecutive minutes with the highest number of vehicles. PRETIMED SIGNAL: A type of traffic signal that directs traffic to stop and go on a predetermined time schedule without regard to traffic conditions. Also, fixed time signal. PROGRESSION: A term used to describe the progressive movement of traffic through several signalized intersections. QUEUE: The number of vehicles waiting at a service area such as a traffic signal, stop sign, or access gate. QUEUE LENGTH: The length of vehicle queue, typically expressed in feet, waiting at a service area such as a traffic signal, stop sign, or access gate. SCREEN-LINE: An imaginary line or physical feature across which all trips are counted, normally to verify the validity of mathematical traffic models. SHARED/RECIPROCAL PARKING AGREEMENT: A written binding document executed between property owners to provide a designated number of off-street parking stalls within a designated area to be available for specified businesses or land uses. SIGHT DISTANCE: The continuous length of roadway visible to a driver or roadway user. SIGNAL CYCLE: The time period in seconds required for one complete sequence of signal indications. SIGNAL PHASE: The part of the signal cycle allocated to one or more traffic movements. STACKING DISTANCE: The length of area available behind a service area, such as a traffic signal or gate, for vehicle queueing to occur. STARTING DELAY: The delay experienced in initiating the movement of queued traffic from a stop to an average running speed through an intersection. STOPPING SIGHT DISTANCE: The minimum distance required by the driver of a vehicle on the major roadway travelling at a given speed to bring the vehicle to a stop after an object on the road becomes visible. Stopping sight distance is measured from the driver’s eye at 42 inches above the pavement to an object height of 6 inches above the pavement. TRAFFIC-ACTUATED SIGNAL: A type of traffic signal that directs traffic to stop and go in accordance with the demands of traffic, as registered by the actuation of detectors. TRIP: The movement of a person or vehicle from one location (origin) to another (destination). For example, from home to store to home is two trips, not one. TRIP-END: One end of a trip at either the origin or destination (i.e., each trip has two trip-ends). A trip-end occurs when a person, object, or message is transferred to or from a vehicle. TRIP GENERATION RATE: The quantity of trips produced and/or attracted by a specific land use stated in terms of units such as per dwelling, per acre, and per 1,000 square feet of floor space. TRUCK: A vehicle having dual tires on one or more axles, or having more than two axles. Apx-5Draft 96 TURNING RADIUS: The circular arc formed by the smallest turning path radius of the front outside tire of a vehicle, such as that performed by a U-turn maneuver. This is based on the length and width of the wheel base as well as the steering mechanism of the vehicle. UNBALANCED FLOW: Heavier traffic flow in one direction than the other. On a daily basis, most facilities have balanced flow. During the peak hours, flow is seldom balanced in an urban area. VEHICLE MILES OF TRAVEL: A measure of the amount of usage of a section of highway, obtained by multiplying the average daily traffic by length of facility in miles. Apx-6Draft 97 APPENDIX B SCOPING AGREEMENT Apx-7Draft 98 2 From:FreddyCarrillo<fcarrillo@MoorparkCA.gov> Sent:Friday,September13,20193:48PM To:PerrieIlercil<perrie@ganddini.com> Subject:RE:5850CondorDr201801TrafficScopingAgreement Hello, Ithinkwelostconnection. Thestudylooksok,however,anapplicationfortheindustrial buildinghasnotbeensubmi tted.Wewillreviewthis reportonceanapplicationisformallysubmitted. Freddy A. Carrillo Associate Planner II Community Development Department City of Moorpark | 799 Moorpark Avenue|Moorpark, CA 93021 805.517.6224|fax: 805.532.2540| fcarrillo@moorparkca.gov www.moorparkca.gov From: Perrie Ilercil [mailto:perrie@ganddini.com] Sent: Friday, September 13, 2019 3:43 PM To: Freddy Carrillo Subject: RE: 5850 Condor Dr 2018-01 Traffic Scoping Agreement Seeattachment,thankyou From:PerrieIlercil Sent:Friday,September13,20193:23PM To:FreddieCarillo(FCarillo@Moorparkca.gov)<FCarillo@Moorparkca.gov> Cc:Giancarlo@ganddini.com Subject:5850CondorDr201801TrafficScopingAgreement HiFreddie, YouandIhavebeenplayingphonetag. SeetheattachedTrafficScopingagreementforthefocusedt rafficimpactanalysispertheOct10,2018letterto DaveOsbornPreapplication201801. Thisisbeingwrittenasasmallfocusedstudywiththetwo intersectionspecifiedinthePreapplicationreviewletter. Ifthereareanyitemsthatshouldbeincludedforthet rafficstudyorwouldbepermanentforthepublicapproval process,pleasemakenoteofitandret urnemailwiththosecomments. IftheCityhasdevelopednewTrafficImpactGuidelinest osupersedethe1992GeneralPlanCirculationElement document,pleaseprovideit. Sincerely, Perrie Ilercil, PE(AZ) SeniorEngineer Apx-8Draft 99     550 Parkcenter Drive, Suite 202, Santa Ana, California 92705 | 714 795 3100 | www.ganddini.com  ORANGE COUNTY     ƒ RIVERSIDE     ƒ     PALO ALTO        MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING    TO:  Freddie Carrillo, City Assistant Planner | CITY OF MOORPARK PARK    FROM:  Perrie Ilercil, PE (AZ) | GANDDINI GROUP, INC.    DATE:  September 12, 2019    SUBJECT: 5850 Condor Drive Project Traffic Study Assumptions    19‐0186    INTRODUCTION    The purpose of this scoping document is to outline the proposed focused traffic analysis parameters and  assumptions for the 5850 Condor Drive Project (Pre‐application number 2018‐01) for review/concurrence  by City of Moorpark Park staff.      PROJECT DESCRIPTION    Figure 1 shows the project location map. The 3.465‐acre project site is located at 5850 Condor Drive in the  City of Moorpark Park. The project site is located at the northeast corner of Princeton Ave and Condor Drive  which is planned for light industrial land use. The project site is currently undeveloped and vacant.     The site plan is illustrated on Figure 2. The proposed project consists of developing the project site with a  48,211 square foot new industrial building with 115 stalls of vehicle parking and 10 bicycle parking. The  proposed project will provide two full access driveways on Condor Drive.    PROJECT TRIP GENERATION & DISTRIBUTION    Table 1 shows the project trip generation based upon rates obtained from the Institute of Transportation  Engineers (ITE), Trip Generation Manual, 10th Edition, 2017, ITE, Trip Generation Handbook, 3rd Edition,  2017. The project trips have been categorized into passenger cars and trucks average truck trip percentage  for industrial park from Trip Generation Handbook. Additionally, the project generated truck trips have been  converted to Passenger Car Equivalent (PCE) trips based on PCE for trucks.     As shown in Table 1, the proposed is forecast to generate approximately 239 daily vehicle trips, including 34  vehicle trips during the AM peak hour and 30 vehicle trips during the PM peak hour. In PCE trips, the project  is forecast to generate approximately 287 daily PCE trips, including 41 PCE trips during the AM peak hour  and 36 PCE trips during the PM peak hour.      Figures 3 and 4 illustrate the forecast directional distribution patterns of the project generated passenger car  and truck trips. Passenger car trips are generally more localized with residential or commercial  origin/destination points, whereas truck trips generally have a more regional distribution travelling to/from  other industrial uses or ports/terminals via the freeway. The project trip distribution patterns are based on  review of existing volume data, surrounding land uses, designated truck routes, and the local and regional  roadway facilities in the project vicinity.    Apx-9Draft transportation • noise • air quality \ GANDDINI GROUP 100   Freddie Carrillo, City Assistant Planner | CITY OF MOORPARK PARK  5850 Condor Drive Project Traffic Study Assumptions  September 12, 2019           5850 Condor Drive Project  Traffic Study Assumptions   2 19‐0186  STUDY AREA    As specified in the City of Moorpark application review letter, the study area shall consist of the following  study intersection:    Study Intersections Jurisdiction  1. Princeton Avenue (NS) at Condor Drive (EW) Moorpark  2. Avenida Colonia (NS) at Condor Drive (EW) Moorpark    TRAFFIC COUNTS    New intersection turning movement counts will be collected at the study intersections during the morning  peak period (7:00 AM – 9:00 AM) and evening peak period (4:00 PM – 6:00 PM) on a typical weekday  (Tuesday, Wednesday, or Thursday) while local schools are in session.     INTERSECTION ANALYSIS METHODOLOGY    The study intersections shall by analyzed using the Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) methodology in  accordance with the parameters established by the Ventura County Congestion Management Program (July  2009). The capacity of individual lanes be used in the ICU calculations is 1,850 vehicles per hour with an  adjustment factor to account for start‐up delay, unequal lane distribution and lost time during clearance. The  effective reduced saturation rate is approximately 1,600 vehicles per hour. Intersection analysis shall be  performed using the Vistro software (Version 6.00‐00).    PERFORMANCE STANDARDS    The City of Moorpark Park has established a minimum acceptable Level of Service C for peak hour intersection  operations.     ANALYSIS SCENARIOS    The traffic study shall evaluate the following analysis scenarios for typical weekday AM and PM peak hour  conditions:     ƒ Existing  ƒ Existing Plus Project    CONCLUSION    We appreciate the opportunity to provide this memorandum of understanding for your review. Should you  have any questions or comments regarding the proposed scope, please contact me.    Sincerely,  Perrie Ilercil, Senior Engineer  c. 949 257‐3126  Apx-10Draft9J1~:Jii 101 Source1 % In % Out Total % In % Out Total Daily ITE 110 88% 12% 0.70 13% 87% 0.63 4.96 Quantity (TSF)In Out Total In Out Total Daily Light Industrial 48.211 Cars (80%)24 3 27 3 21 24 191 Trucks (20%)3 61715648 TOTAL VEHICLE TRIPS GENERATED 30 4 34 4 26 30 239 Quantity (TSF)In Out Total In Out Total Daily Light Industrial 48.211 Cars 24 3 27 3 21 24 191 Trucks (PCE Factor = 2.0)12 2 14 2 10 12 96 TOTAL PCE TRIPS GENERATED 36 5 41 5 31 36 287 Notes: (1) (2)TSF = Thousand Square Feet (3) Passenger Car Equivalent (PCE) Trips Generated AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Land Use/Vehicle Type ITE = Institute of Transportation Engineers, Trip Generation Manual (10th Edition, 2017); ### = Land Use Code. Land Use/Vehicle Type Per ITE Trip Generation Handbook (3rd Edition, 2017), average truck trips for industrial park uses is approximately 13 percent. The percent of  trucks for this analysis is rounded up to 20% to provide a conservative analysis. Table 1 Project Trip Generation Trip Generation Rates per TSF2 AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Light Industrial Vehicle Trips Generated AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Land Use/Vehicle Type  5850 Cordor Drive Traffic Impact Scoping Agreement 19‐0186 Apx-11Draftg:i,j::Jii 102 Apx-12DraftLegend . 0 Study Intersection Figure 1 Project Location Map Drive Pro ject 5850 Co ndo; ffic Analys is Foc use d ra l 9 -01 86 103 Apx-13DraftV IE-,-, .. ,, r rl ~ :~~~MJli.wr I (U)CAliONJIJl'P,_I I I I / I I 1/11 1/ Figure 2 Site Plan 5850 Co ndor D rive Project Foc use d Traffic Analys is 19 -01 86 104 Apx-14Draft· ct Legend t From/To ProJe ..._10% Percen Figure 3 . t· n _ Cars T ·p Distribu 10 p ject ri ro Dri ve Project 5850 Condo; ffic Anal ys is Fo cused ra l 9-0186 105 Apx-15Draft· ct Legend t From/To ProJe ..._10% Percen Figure 4 . -Trucks . t Trip Distribution ProJec o,;" Pmject 5850 Condo; ffic Anal ys is Fo cused ra l 9-0186 106 APPENDIX C GENERAL PLAN CIRCULATION ELEMENT FIGURES Apx-16Draft 107 Apx-17Draft9R0-"'"'"'y • ! '·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·~----·-·~·-·-·~·-·-·-·--·-FREEWAY ---/)=: o-TERCH>.NGE SIX-LANE AATERIAL 6 FOUR-1.AN'E ART(RIAL --R--RUlv\L COU£CTOR LOC>.L COI.U:CTOR :I SIGN>.LIZEO INTf.RS(CTION CJ ,\T-GRADE RR CROSSING □ 0RADE SEP·\R,,TT:O RR (Rnssr:--G -·-·-·-·-· CrTY Ll.\lrT oou,-.O,\f{ y ■111••···· SR-118 FREt:W>. Y CIJRRIOOR Source: City of Moorpark 9:1,~::lii .,· ·, ! ·~•~ ..... _, '·-·--· I I I i -·-·.._ .... .. :, > 0 TTEk R...\ Figure C1 City of Moorpark General Plan Circulation Element 5850 Condor Drive Project Focused T raffle Analysis 19-0186 108 Apx-18Draft10' o· 8' 12 ' 10' B' Source : City of Moorpark 11 O' -120' R.O.W. 12' 12' 80' -R.O.W 12' 70' -90' R.O .W 2 Lane 6 Lane Arterial :12' 2 Lane Arterial ·,.12' 2 Lane Rural Collector 12' 1 8' ~ Collector 12' 12' 8' ~ 50' -70' R .O .W. a· 10' B' Figure C2 City of Moorpark General Plan Roadway Cross-Sections 5850 Condor Drive Project Focused Traffic Analys is 19-0186 109 Apx-19DraftIUIIIIIJIIOU ••••• -~------Cl.ASS II 81KF.W4 Y < 91!.E LANE> 4 pa~d arc:· 01 • roaelwh d,e\1f"••cd ro, prcfcrcn1,,1f vt,tt of b~lc1. P.1,.rmen1 mu,,nu ~nd ,11n,11r 1"4,c:-1,c ,nC' ptucncc of a bike lane Of\ (.'LA,S,S llr nrJl:.E\,l,.\Y tSl~E KOLIC:1 · "'C"Ol\1t(nl10nal llrtcl .. l'lur n,•e r:;:i.,·~J -l'C' 11'\J,c,t1tO Ph ~•a:n onl~ tf'lrrc ,11c no J9<c,.11 Clhc,..,r.r -.JJ\. .. :1\f, .,nlJ .. •<"Cit" uJf(,c ua,c1 1hc ro,t.1-,11~ ...... r,,. "":":-urori,ctJ 1,;1r1c On1,. tt.u. Ill hc1h11c1 -•ucti conncc1 U'lc -'•1QO'l)Jllr. ,rhtrr ........ ti 1r,c rtiron.111 b1kc..,a~ t't\lC~ Jitc 1J,:n1,f1i:d ,., ,nr tt,1t.'°-•"' ner-orlL Ro~d•,11' wf\1Ch ltC' no• Je1,,n.11ca •••h ., 1 l.1" It ~•lt.c ... h. l'tul .. P'l,cl'I \Cr'\-C u Cflnnrcr,cn, flo(~••tcn l"t,o rl r.1c11,r,c, "' 1hc ,e-,,onal b,ll.c•,1y hllCl'T'I ,nou1d t-c con,,\J.,;rcd .JI l'i.,n Ill b11t.c-l~ (IH Ll\lrr ijl)L:SOARV Source: City of Moorpark 9:1,~::lii C S'Tll££1 Figure C3 City of Moorpark General Plan Bike Routes 5850 Condor Drive Project Focused T raffle Analysis 19-0186 110 APPENDIX D INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT WORKSHEETS Apx-20Draft 111 DATE:LOCATION:PROJECT #:SC Wed, Sep 18, 19 NORTH & SOUTH:LOCATION #:1 EAST & WEST:CONTROL:STOP W NOTES:AM ▲ PM N MD ◄W E ► OTHER S OTHER ▼ NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL NB SB EB WB TTL LANES:X10 1 1XXXX0X 0 0000 7:00 AM 014312 8 69000010 4 237 00000 7:15 AM 01628 4 77000000 7 258 00000 7:30 AM 02138 5 82000000 8 316 00000 7:45 AM 022814 9162000020 8 423 00000 8:00 AM 021313 8131000030 5 373 00000 8:15 AM 01881710119000010 4 339 00000 8:30 AM 018510 5118000030 3 324 00000 8:45 AM 019612 7 74000000 2 291 00000 VOLUMES 01,52894568320000100412,56100000 APPROACH % 0% 94% 6% 6% 94% 0% 0% 0% 0% 20% 0% 80% APP/DEPART 1,622 /1,569 888 /842 0 /150 51 /00 BEGIN PEAK HR VOLUMES 08145432530000090201,459 APPROACH % 0% 94% 6% 6% 94% 0% 0% 0% 0% 31% 0% 69% PEAK HR FACTOR 0.897 0.822 0.000 0.725 0.862 APP/DEPART 868 /834 562 /539 0 /86 29 /00 4:00 PM 01663 91680000100 5 361 00000 4:15 PM 01619 20168000090 6 373 00000 4:30 PM 01775 1019000009013404 00000 4:45 PM 01874 2210000050 3 411 00000 5:00 PM 01932 32510000140 5 468 00000 5:15 PM 01967 622800009010456 00000 5:30 PM 01766 21930000110 5 393 00000 5:45 PM 01424 7186000090 5 353 00000 VOLUMES 01,39840591,5940000760523,21900000 APPROACH % 0% 97% 3% 4% 96% 0% 0% 0% 0% 59% 0% 41% APP/DEPART 1,438 /1,450 1,653 /1,670 0 /99 128 /00 BEGIN PEAK HR VOLUMES 075318218790000370311,739 APPROACH % 0% 98% 2% 2% 98% 0% 0% 0% 0% 54% 0% 46% PEAK HR FACTOR 0.950 0.886 0.000 0.773 0.929 APP/DEPART 771 /784 900 /916 0 /39 68 /00 Princeton NORTH SIDE Condor WEST SIDE EAST SIDE Condor SOUTH SIDE Princeton INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNTS PREPARED BY: AimTD LLC. tel: 714 253 7888 cs@aimtd.com Moorpark Princeton Condor U-TURNS Princeton Princeton Condor Condor AM7:45 AM PM4:30 PM Add U-Turns to Left Turns Apx-21Draft-1 I LJ : I I· I I I I I I I I I I 11 I I I ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------!-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------!-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------!-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------!-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------~-t t ! ! -----,----,------ 112 DATE:LOCATION:PROJECT #:SC Wed, Sep 18, 19 NORTH & SOUTH:LOCATION #:2 EAST & WEST:CONTROL:STOP N NOTES:AM ▲ PM N MD ◄W E ► OTHER S OTHER ▼ NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL NB SB EB WB TTL LANES:0X0 X XXX1001 X 0000 7:00 AM 300 0 00016201 0 22 00000 7:15 AM 900 0 00010100 0 20 10001 7:30 AM 800 0 00013401 0 26 00000 7:45 AM 700 0 00023200 0 32 00000 8:00 AM 800 0 00020300 0 31 00000 8:15 AM 800 0 00018601 0 33 00000 8:30 AM 100 0 00017100 0 19 00000 8:45 AM 100 0 0009202 0 14 00101 VOLUMES 45 0 0 0 0 0 0 126 21 0 5 0 199 1 0 1 0 2 APPROACH % 98% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 85% 14% 0% 100% 0% APP/DEPART 46 /00 /22 148 /126 5 /51 0 BEGIN PEAK HR VOLUMES 3100 0 000741502 0 122 APPROACH % 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 83% 17% 0% 100% 0% PEAK HR FACTOR 0.969 0.000 0.890 0.500 0.924 APP/DEPART 31 /00 /15 89 /74 2 /33 0 4:00 PM 200 0 000940130 28 00000 4:15 PM 702 0 0002630140 52 00000 4:30 PM 401 0 000460130 28 00011 4:45 PM 101 0 000341110 21 00011 5:00 PM 101 0 000170140 24 00101 5:15 PM 200 0 000290160 29 00000 5:30 PM 800 0 0000908 0 25 00000 5:45 PM 202 0 0003709 0 23 00000 VOLUMES 27 0 7 0 0 0 0 48 49 1 98 0 233 0 0 1 2 3 APPROACH % 79% 0% 21% 0% 0% 0% 0% 49% 50% 1% 97% 0% APP/DEPART 34 /00 /50 98 /57 101 /126 0 BEGIN PEAK HR VOLUMES 14 0 4 0 0 0 0 42 17 1 51 0 131 APPROACH % 78% 0% 22% 0% 0% 0% 0% 71% 29% 2% 94% 0% PEAK HR FACTOR 0.500 0.000 0.509 0.964 0.630 APP/DEPART 18 /00 /18 59 /48 54 /65 0 Virginia Colony NORTH SIDE Condor WEST SIDE EAST SIDE Condor SOUTH SIDE Virginia Colony INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNTS PREPARED BY: AimTD LLC. tel: 714 253 7888 cs@aimtd.com Moorpark Virginia Colony Condor U-TURNS Virginia Colony Virginia Colony Condor Condor AM7:30 AM PM4:00 PM Add U-Turns to Left Turns Apx-22Draft-1 I LJ : I I· I I I I I I I I I I 11 I I I ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------!-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------!-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------!-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------!-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------~-t t ! ! -----,----,------ 113 APPENDIX E INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE WORKSHEETS Apx-23Draft 114 EXISTING Apx-24Draft 115 Intersection Analysis Summary 10/1/2019Report File: G:\...\AME.pdf Scenario 1 ExistingVistro File: G:\...\AM.vistro 5850 Condor Drive Moorpark, CA V/C, Delay, LOS: For two-way stop, these values are taken from the movement with the worst (highest) delay value. For all other control types, they are taken for the whole intersection. A9.10.034NB LeftHCM 6th EditionTwo-way stopVirginia Colony Pl (NS) at Condor Dr (EW)2 D31.10.061WB LeftHCM 6th EditionTwo-way stopPrinceton Ave (NS) at Condor Dr (EW)1 LOSDelay (s/veh)V/CWorst MvmtMethodControl TypeIntersection NameID 10/1/2019 AM Peak HourScenario 1: 1 Existing 5850 Condor Drive Moorpark, CA Version 6.00-00 Generated with Apx-25Draft 116 0.061Volume to Capacity (v/c): DLevel Of Service: 31.1Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: HCM 6th EditionAnalysis Method: Two-way stopControl Type: Intersection 1: Princeton Ave (NS) at Condor Dr (EW) Intersection Level Of Service Report NoNoNoCrosswalk 0.000.000.00Grade [%] 25.0030.0030.00Speed [mph] 100.00100.00100.00120.00100.00100.00Pocket Length [ft] 000100No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] RightLeftThruLeftRightThruTurning Movement Lane Configuration WestboundSouthboundNorthboundApproach Condor DrPrinceton AvePrinceton AveName Intersection Setup 000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 2095303254814Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 52133814204Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Peak Hour Factor 2095303254814Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000Other Volume [veh/h] 000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 000000Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.001.001.001.001.001.00Growth Rate 2.002.002.002.002.002.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 2095303254814Base Volume Input [veh/h] Condor DrPrinceton AvePrinceton AveName Volumes 10/1/2019 AM Peak HourScenario 1: 1 Existing 5850 Condor Drive Moorpark, CA Version 6.00-00 Generated with Apx-26DraftIr ,, ,r 117 DIntersection LOS 0.61d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] CAAApproach LOS 20.050.560.00d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 4.184.850.003.220.000.0095th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 0.170.190.000.130.000.0095th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] CDAAAAMovement LOS 15.0631.150.009.840.000.00d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 0.050.060.010.040.000.01V/C, Movement V/C Ratio Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results 000Number of Storage Spaces in Median NoTwo-Stage Gap Acceptance 000Storage Area [veh] Flared Lane StopFreeFreePriority Scheme Intersection Settings 10/1/2019 AM Peak HourScenario 1: 1 Existing 5850 Condor Drive Moorpark, CA Version 6.00-00 Generated with Apx-27Draft 118 0.034Volume to Capacity (v/c): ALevel Of Service: 9.1Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: HCM 6th EditionAnalysis Method: Two-way stopControl Type: Intersection 2: Virginia Colony Pl (NS) at Condor Dr (EW) Intersection Level Of Service Report NoNoNoCrosswalk 0.000.000.00Grade [%] 25.0025.0025.00Speed [mph] 100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00Pocket Length [ft] 000000No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] ThruLeftRightThruRightLeftTurning Movement Lane Configuration WestboundEastboundNorthboundApproach Condor DrCondor DrVirginia Colony PlName Intersection Setup 000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 201574031Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 1041908Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Peak Hour Factor 201574031Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000Other Volume [veh/h] 000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 000000Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.001.001.001.001.001.00Growth Rate 2.002.002.002.002.002.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 201574031Base Volume Input [veh/h] Condor DrCondor DrVirginia Colony PlName Volumes 10/1/2019 AM Peak HourScenario 1: 1 Existing 5850 Condor Drive Moorpark, CA Version 6.00-00 Generated with Apx-28DraftT ,.. i 119 AIntersection LOS 2.30d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] AAAApproach LOS 0.000.009.06d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 0.000.000.000.002.622.6295th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 0.000.000.000.000.100.1095th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] AAAAAAMovement LOS 0.007.390.000.008.829.06d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 0.000.000.000.000.000.03V/C, Movement V/C Ratio Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results 000Number of Storage Spaces in Median NoTwo-Stage Gap Acceptance 000Storage Area [veh] NoFlared Lane FreeFreeStopPriority Scheme Intersection Settings 10/1/2019 AM Peak HourScenario 1: 1 Existing 5850 Condor Drive Moorpark, CA Version 6.00-00 Generated with Apx-29Draft 120 Intersection Analysis Summary 10/1/2019Report File: G:\...\PME.pdf Scenario 1 ExistingVistro File: G:\...\PM.vistro 5850 Condor Drive Moorpark, CA V/C, Delay, LOS: For two-way stop, these values are taken from the movement with the worst (highest) delay value. For all other control types, they are taken for the whole intersection. A8.80.015NB LeftHCM 6th EditionTwo-way stopVirginia Colony Pl (NS) at Condor Dr (EW)2 F58.80.361WB LeftHCM 6th EditionTwo-way stopPrinceton Ave (NS) at Condor Dr (EW)1 LOSDelay (s/veh)V/CWorst MvmtMethodControl TypeIntersection NameID 10/1/2019 PM Peak HourScenario 1: 1 Existing 5850 Condor Drive Moorpark, CA Version 6.00-00 Generated with Apx-30Draft 121 0.361Volume to Capacity (v/c): FLevel Of Service: 58.8Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: HCM 6th EditionAnalysis Method: Two-way stopControl Type: Intersection 1: Princeton Ave (NS) at Condor Dr (EW) Intersection Level Of Service Report NoNoNoCrosswalk 0.000.000.00Grade [%] 25.0030.0030.00Speed [mph] 100.00100.00100.00120.00100.00100.00Pocket Length [ft] 000100No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] RightLeftThruLeftRightThruTurning Movement Lane Configuration WestboundSouthboundNorthboundApproach Condor DrPrinceton AvePrinceton AveName Intersection Setup 000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 31378792118753Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 8922055188Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Peak Hour Factor 31378792118753Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000Other Volume [veh/h] 000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 000000Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.001.001.001.001.001.00Growth Rate 2.002.002.002.002.002.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 31378792118753Base Volume Input [veh/h] Condor DrPrinceton AvePrinceton AveName Volumes 10/1/2019 PM Peak HourScenario 1: 1 Existing 5850 Condor Drive Moorpark, CA Version 6.00-00 Generated with Apx-31DraftIr ,, ,r 122 FIntersection LOS 1.62d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] EAAApproach LOS 38.620.220.00d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 6.1136.060.001.910.000.0095th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 0.241.440.000.080.000.0095th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] BFAAAAMovement LOS 14.5158.820.009.380.000.00d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 0.080.360.010.020.000.01V/C, Movement V/C Ratio Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results 000Number of Storage Spaces in Median NoTwo-Stage Gap Acceptance 000Storage Area [veh] Flared Lane StopFreeFreePriority Scheme Intersection Settings 10/1/2019 PM Peak HourScenario 1: 1 Existing 5850 Condor Drive Moorpark, CA Version 6.00-00 Generated with Apx-32Draft 123 0.015Volume to Capacity (v/c): ALevel Of Service: 8.8Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: HCM 6th EditionAnalysis Method: Two-way stopControl Type: Intersection 2: Virginia Colony Pl (NS) at Condor Dr (EW) Intersection Level Of Service Report NoNoNoCrosswalk 0.000.000.00Grade [%] 25.0025.0025.00Speed [mph] 100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00Pocket Length [ft] 0000000No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] ThruLeftU-turnRightThruRightLeftTurning Movement Lane Configuration WestboundEastboundNorthboundApproach Condor DrCondor DrVirginia Colony PlName Intersection Setup 000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 51121742414Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 130141114Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Peak Hour Factor 51121742414Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 0000000Other Volume [veh/h] 0000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 0000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 0000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0000000Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 0000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.00Growth Rate 2.002.002.002.002.002.002.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 51121742414Base Volume Input [veh/h] Condor DrCondor DrVirginia Colony PlName Volumes 10/1/2019 PM Peak HourScenario 1: 1 Existing 5850 Condor Drive Moorpark, CA Version 6.00-00 Generated with Apx-33DraftT ,.. .,. 124 AIntersection LOS 2.28d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] AAAApproach LOS 8.060.008.79d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 0.000.060.060.000.001.421.4295th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 0.000.000.000.000.000.060.0695th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] AAAAAAMovement LOS 0.007.348.430.000.008.618.85d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 0.000.000.000.000.000.000.01V/C, Movement V/C Ratio Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results 000Number of Storage Spaces in Median NoTwo-Stage Gap Acceptance 000Storage Area [veh] NoFlared Lane FreeFreeStopPriority Scheme Intersection Settings 10/1/2019 PM Peak HourScenario 1: 1 Existing 5850 Condor Drive Moorpark, CA Version 6.00-00 Generated with Apx-34Draft 125 EXISTING PLUS PROJECT Apx-35Draft 126 Intersection Analysis Summary 10/1/2019Report File: G:\...\AMEp.pdf Scenario 2 Existing Plus ProjectVistro File: G:\...\AM.vistro 5850 Condor Drive Moorpark, CA V/C, Delay, LOS: For two-way stop, these values are taken from the movement with the worst (highest) delay value. For all other control types, they are taken for the whole intersection. A9.20.000SB LeftHCM 6th EditionTwo-way stopEast Project Dwy (NS) at Condor Dr (EW)4 A9.20.000SB LeftHCM 6th EditionTwo-way stopWest Project Dwy (NS) at Condor Dr (EW)3 A9.30.036NB LeftHCM 6th EditionTwo-way stopVirginia Colony Pl (NS) at Condor Dr (EW)2 D34.60.076WB LeftHCM 6th EditionTwo-way stopPrinceton Ave (NS) at Condor Dr (EW)1 LOSDelay (s/veh)V/CWorst MvmtMethodControl TypeIntersection NameID 10/1/2019 AM Peak HourScenario 2: 2 Existing Plus Project 5850 Condor Drive Moorpark, CA Version 6.00-00 Generated with Apx-36Draft 127 0.076Volume to Capacity (v/c): DLevel Of Service: 34.6Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: HCM 6th EditionAnalysis Method: Two-way stopControl Type: Intersection 1: Princeton Ave (NS) at Condor Dr (EW) Intersection Level Of Service Report NoNoNoCrosswalk 0.000.000.00Grade [%] 25.0030.0030.00Speed [mph] 100.00100.00100.00120.00100.00100.00Pocket Length [ft] 000100No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] RightLeftThruLeftRightThruTurning Movement Lane Configuration WestboundSouthboundNorthboundApproach Condor DrPrinceton AvePrinceton AveName Intersection Setup 000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 24105305864814Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 631331516204Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Peak Hour Factor 24105305864814Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000Other Volume [veh/h] 000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 41026100Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.001.001.001.001.001.00Growth Rate 2.002.002.002.002.002.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 2095303254814Base Volume Input [veh/h] Condor DrPrinceton AvePrinceton AveName Volumes 10/1/2019 AM Peak HourScenario 2: 2 Existing Plus Project 5850 Condor Drive Moorpark, CA Version 6.00-00 Generated with Apx-37DraftIr ,, ,r 128 DIntersection LOS 0.86d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] CAAApproach LOS 20.890.990.00d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 5.066.080.006.100.000.0095th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 0.200.240.000.240.000.0095th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] CDABAAMovement LOS 15.1734.630.0010.060.000.00d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 0.060.080.010.080.000.01V/C, Movement V/C Ratio Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results 000Number of Storage Spaces in Median NoTwo-Stage Gap Acceptance 000Storage Area [veh] Flared Lane StopFreeFreePriority Scheme Intersection Settings 10/1/2019 AM Peak HourScenario 2: 2 Existing Plus Project 5850 Condor Drive Moorpark, CA Version 6.00-00 Generated with Apx-38Draft 129 0.036Volume to Capacity (v/c): ALevel Of Service: 9.3Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: HCM 6th EditionAnalysis Method: Two-way stopControl Type: Intersection 2: Virginia Colony Pl (NS) at Condor Dr (EW) Intersection Level Of Service Report NoNoNoCrosswalk 0.000.000.00Grade [%] 25.0025.0025.00Speed [mph] 100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00Pocket Length [ft] 000000No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] ThruLeftRightThruRightLeftTurning Movement Lane Configuration WestboundEastboundNorthboundApproach Condor DrCondor DrVirginia Colony PlName Intersection Setup 000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 7015110031Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 2042808Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Peak Hour Factor 7015110031Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000Other Volume [veh/h] 000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 5003600Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.001.001.001.001.001.00Growth Rate 2.002.002.002.002.002.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 201574031Base Volume Input [veh/h] Condor DrCondor DrVirginia Colony PlName Volumes 10/1/2019 AM Peak HourScenario 2: 2 Existing Plus Project 5850 Condor Drive Moorpark, CA Version 6.00-00 Generated with Apx-39DraftT ,.. i 130 AIntersection LOS 1.77d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] AAAApproach LOS 0.000.009.29d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 0.000.000.000.002.772.7795th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 0.000.000.000.000.110.1195th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] AAAAAAMovement LOS 0.007.460.000.009.019.29d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 0.000.000.000.000.000.04V/C, Movement V/C Ratio Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results 000Number of Storage Spaces in Median NoTwo-Stage Gap Acceptance 000Storage Area [veh] NoFlared Lane FreeFreeStopPriority Scheme Intersection Settings 10/1/2019 AM Peak HourScenario 2: 2 Existing Plus Project 5850 Condor Drive Moorpark, CA Version 6.00-00 Generated with Apx-40Draft 131 0.000Volume to Capacity (v/c): ALevel Of Service: 9.2Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: HCM 6th EditionAnalysis Method: Two-way stopControl Type: Intersection 3: West Project Dwy (NS) at Condor Dr (EW) Intersection Level Of Service Report NoNoNoCrosswalk 0.000.000.00Grade [%] 25.0025.0025.00Speed [mph] 100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00Pocket Length [ft] 000000No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] RightThruThruLeftRightLeftTurning Movement Lane Configuration WestboundEastboundSouthboundApproach Condor DrCondor DrWest Project DwyName Intersection Setup 000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 05981220Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 0125310Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Peak Hour Factor 05981220Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000Other Volume [veh/h] 000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 03241220Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.001.001.001.001.001.00Growth Rate 2.002.002.002.002.002.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 0274000Base Volume Input [veh/h] Condor DrCondor DrWest Project DwyName Volumes 10/1/2019 AM Peak HourScenario 2: 2 Existing Plus Project 5850 Condor Drive Moorpark, CA Version 6.00-00 Generated with Apx-41DraftT i J-. 132 AIntersection LOS 0.89d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] AAAApproach LOS 0.000.798.35d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 0.000.000.560.560.140.1495th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 0.000.000.020.020.010.0195th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] AAAAAAMovement LOS 0.000.000.007.248.359.19d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 0.000.000.000.010.000.00V/C, Movement V/C Ratio Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results 000Number of Storage Spaces in Median NoTwo-Stage Gap Acceptance 000Storage Area [veh] NoFlared Lane FreeFreeStopPriority Scheme Intersection Settings 10/1/2019 AM Peak HourScenario 2: 2 Existing Plus Project 5850 Condor Drive Moorpark, CA Version 6.00-00 Generated with Apx-42Draft 133 0.000Volume to Capacity (v/c): ALevel Of Service: 9.2Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: HCM 6th EditionAnalysis Method: Two-way stopControl Type: Intersection 4: East Project Dwy (NS) at Condor Dr (EW) Intersection Level Of Service Report NoNoNoCrosswalk 0.000.000.00Grade [%] 25.0025.0025.00Speed [mph] 100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00Pocket Length [ft] 000000No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] RightThruThruLeftRightLeftTurning Movement Lane Configuration WestboundEastboundSouthboundApproach Condor DrCondor DrEast Project DwyName Intersection Setup 000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 02742430Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 0119610Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Peak Hour Factor 02742430Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000Other Volume [veh/h] 000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0002430Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.001.001.001.001.001.00Growth Rate 2.002.002.002.002.002.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 0274000Base Volume Input [veh/h] Condor DrCondor DrEast Project DwyName Volumes 10/1/2019 AM Peak HourScenario 2: 2 Existing Plus Project 5850 Condor Drive Moorpark, CA Version 6.00-00 Generated with Apx-43DraftT i J-. 134 AIntersection LOS 1.93d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] AAAApproach LOS 0.001.788.34d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 0.000.001.131.130.210.2195th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 0.000.000.050.050.010.0195th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] AAAAAAMovement LOS 0.000.000.007.268.349.21d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 0.000.000.000.010.000.00V/C, Movement V/C Ratio Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results 000Number of Storage Spaces in Median NoTwo-Stage Gap Acceptance 000Storage Area [veh] NoFlared Lane FreeFreeStopPriority Scheme Intersection Settings 10/1/2019 AM Peak HourScenario 2: 2 Existing Plus Project 5850 Condor Drive Moorpark, CA Version 6.00-00 Generated with Apx-44Draft 135 Intersection Analysis Summary 10/1/2019Report File: G:\...\PMEp.pdf Scenario 2 Existing Plus ProjectVistro File: G:\...\PM.vistro 5850 Condor Drive Moorpark, CA V/C, Delay, LOS: For two-way stop, these values are taken from the movement with the worst (highest) delay value. For all other control types, they are taken for the whole intersection. A9.10.000SB LeftHCM 6th EditionTwo-way stopEast Project Dwy (NS) at Condor Dr (EW)4 A9.20.000SB LeftHCM 6th EditionTwo-way stopWest Project Dwy (NS) at Condor Dr (EW)3 A8.90.015NB LeftHCM 6th EditionTwo-way stopVirginia Colony Pl (NS) at Condor Dr (EW)2 F66.80.447WB LeftHCM 6th EditionTwo-way stopPrinceton Ave (NS) at Condor Dr (EW)1 LOSDelay (s/veh)V/CWorst MvmtMethodControl TypeIntersection NameID 10/1/2019 PM Peak HourScenario 2: 2 Existing Plus Project 5850 Condor Drive Moorpark, CA Version 6.00-00 Generated with Apx-45Draft 136 0.447Volume to Capacity (v/c): FLevel Of Service: 66.8Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: HCM 6th EditionAnalysis Method: Two-way stopControl Type: Intersection 1: Princeton Ave (NS) at Condor Dr (EW) Intersection Level Of Service Report NoNoNoCrosswalk 0.000.000.00Grade [%] 25.0030.0030.00Speed [mph] 100.00100.00100.00120.00100.00100.00Pocket Length [ft] 000100No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] RightLeftThruLeftRightThruTurning Movement Lane Configuration WestboundSouthboundNorthboundApproach Condor DrPrinceton AvePrinceton AveName Intersection Setup 000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 54458792519753Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 141122065188Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Peak Hour Factor 54458792519753Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000Other Volume [veh/h] 000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 2380410Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.001.001.001.001.001.00Growth Rate 2.002.002.002.002.002.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 31378792118753Base Volume Input [veh/h] Condor DrPrinceton AvePrinceton AveName Volumes 10/1/2019 PM Peak HourScenario 2: 2 Existing Plus Project 5850 Condor Drive Moorpark, CA Version 6.00-00 Generated with Apx-46DraftIr ,, ,r 137 FIntersection LOS 2.29d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] EAAApproach LOS 38.620.260.00d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 11.2747.550.002.290.000.0095th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 0.451.900.000.090.000.0095th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] CFAAAAMovement LOS 15.1266.820.009.400.000.00d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 0.130.450.010.030.000.01V/C, Movement V/C Ratio Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results 000Number of Storage Spaces in Median NoTwo-Stage Gap Acceptance 000Storage Area [veh] Flared Lane StopFreeFreePriority Scheme Intersection Settings 10/1/2019 PM Peak HourScenario 2: 2 Existing Plus Project 5850 Condor Drive Moorpark, CA Version 6.00-00 Generated with Apx-47Draft 138 0.015Volume to Capacity (v/c): ALevel Of Service: 8.9Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: HCM 6th EditionAnalysis Method: Two-way stopControl Type: Intersection 2: Virginia Colony Pl (NS) at Condor Dr (EW) Intersection Level Of Service Report NoNoNoCrosswalk 0.000.000.00Grade [%] 25.0025.0025.00Speed [mph] 100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00Pocket Length [ft] 0000000No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] ThruLeftU-turnRightThruRightLeftTurning Movement Lane Configuration WestboundEastboundNorthboundApproach Condor DrCondor DrVirginia Colony PlName Intersection Setup 000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 82121747414Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 210141214Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Peak Hour Factor 82121747414Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 0000000Other Volume [veh/h] 0000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 0000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 0000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 31000500Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 0000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.00Growth Rate 2.002.002.002.002.002.002.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 51121742414Base Volume Input [veh/h] Condor DrCondor DrVirginia Colony PlName Volumes 10/1/2019 PM Peak HourScenario 2: 2 Existing Plus Project 5850 Condor Drive Moorpark, CA Version 6.00-00 Generated with Apx-48DraftT ,.. .,. 139 AIntersection LOS 2.15d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] AAAApproach LOS 8.080.008.82d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 0.000.060.060.000.001.431.4395th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 0.000.000.000.000.000.060.0695th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] AAAAAAMovement LOS 0.007.358.450.000.008.638.87d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 0.000.000.000.000.000.000.01V/C, Movement V/C Ratio Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results 000Number of Storage Spaces in Median NoTwo-Stage Gap Acceptance 000Storage Area [veh] NoFlared Lane FreeFreeStopPriority Scheme Intersection Settings 10/1/2019 PM Peak HourScenario 2: 2 Existing Plus Project 5850 Condor Drive Moorpark, CA Version 6.00-00 Generated with Apx-49Draft 140 0.000Volume to Capacity (v/c): ALevel Of Service: 9.2Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: HCM 6th EditionAnalysis Method: Two-way stopControl Type: Intersection 3: West Project Dwy (NS) at Condor Dr (EW) Intersection Level Of Service Report NoNoNoCrosswalk 0.000.000.00Grade [%] 25.0025.0025.00Speed [mph] 100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00Pocket Length [ft] 000000No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] RightThruThruLeftRightLeftTurning Movement Lane Configuration WestboundEastboundSouthboundApproach Condor DrCondor DrWest Project DwyName Intersection Setup 000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 076492110Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 01912130Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Peak Hour Factor 076492110Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000Other Volume [veh/h] 000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 02032110Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.001.001.001.001.001.00Growth Rate 2.002.002.002.002.002.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 05646000Base Volume Input [veh/h] Condor DrCondor DrWest Project DwyName Volumes 10/1/2019 PM Peak HourScenario 2: 2 Existing Plus Project 5850 Condor Drive Moorpark, CA Version 6.00-00 Generated with Apx-50DraftT i J-. 141 AIntersection LOS 0.80d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] AAAApproach LOS 0.000.298.70d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 0.000.000.100.100.850.8595th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 0.000.000.000.000.030.0395th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] AAAAAAMovement LOS 0.000.000.007.378.709.21d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 0.000.000.000.000.010.00V/C, Movement V/C Ratio Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results 000Number of Storage Spaces in Median NoTwo-Stage Gap Acceptance 000Storage Area [veh] NoFlared Lane FreeFreeStopPriority Scheme Intersection Settings 10/1/2019 PM Peak HourScenario 2: 2 Existing Plus Project 5850 Condor Drive Moorpark, CA Version 6.00-00 Generated with Apx-51Draft 142 0.000Volume to Capacity (v/c): ALevel Of Service: 9.1Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: HCM 6th EditionAnalysis Method: Two-way stopControl Type: Intersection 4: East Project Dwy (NS) at Condor Dr (EW) Intersection Level Of Service Report NoNoNoCrosswalk 0.000.000.00Grade [%] 25.0025.0025.00Speed [mph] 100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00Pocket Length [ft] 000000No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] RightThruThruLeftRightLeftTurning Movement Lane Configuration WestboundEastboundSouthboundApproach Condor DrCondor DrEast Project DwyName Intersection Setup 000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 056463200Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 01412150Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Peak Hour Factor 056463200Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000Other Volume [veh/h] 000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0003200Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.001.001.001.001.001.00Growth Rate 2.002.002.002.002.002.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 05646000Base Volume Input [veh/h] Condor DrCondor DrEast Project DwyName Volumes 10/1/2019 PM Peak HourScenario 2: 2 Existing Plus Project 5850 Condor Drive Moorpark, CA Version 6.00-00 Generated with Apx-52DraftT i J-. 143 AIntersection LOS 1.56d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] AAAApproach LOS 0.000.458.63d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 0.000.000.150.151.511.5195th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 0.000.000.010.010.060.0695th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] AAAAAAMovement LOS 0.000.000.007.338.639.13d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 0.000.000.000.000.020.00V/C, Movement V/C Ratio Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results 000Number of Storage Spaces in Median NoTwo-Stage Gap Acceptance 000Storage Area [veh] NoFlared Lane FreeFreeStopPriority Scheme Intersection Settings 10/1/2019 PM Peak HourScenario 2: 2 Existing Plus Project 5850 Condor Drive Moorpark, CA Version 6.00-00 Generated with Apx-53Draft 144 APPENDIX F TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANT WORKSHEETS Apx-54Draft 145 California Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devlces WARRANT 3, PEAK HOUR (Urban Areas) Traffic Conditions =Existing Without Project ‐ AM Major Street Name =Princeton Avenue Total of Both Approaches (VPH) =1430 Number of Approach Lanes on Major Street =2 Minor Street Name =Condor Drive High Volume Approach (VPH) =29 Number of Approach Lanes On Minor Street =1 SIGNAL WARRANT NOT SATISFIED * Note: 150 vph applies as the lower threshold volume for a minor-street approach with two or more lanes and 100 vph applies as the lower threshold volume for a minor-street approach with one lane. Minor Street - Higher-Volume Approach - VPH143029 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 Major Street - Total of Both Approaches - Vehicles Per Hour (VPH) 1 Lane (Major) & 1 Lane (Minor) 2+ Lanes (Major) & 1 Lane (Minor) OR 1 Lane (Major) & 2+ Lanes (Minor) 2+ Lanes (Major) & 2+ Lanes (Minor) Major Street Approaches Minor Street Approaches *150 *100 18-0085_SIGNAL WARRANT3_URBAN.xlsm Sect. 4C.06 Apx-55Draft----· 146 California Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devlces WARRANT 3, PEAK HOUR (Urban Areas) Traffic Conditions =Existing Without Project ‐ PM Major Street Name =Princeton Avenue Total of Both Approaches (VPH) =1671 Number of Approach Lanes on Major Street =1 Minor Street Name =Condor Drive High Volume Approach (VPH) =68 Number of Approach Lanes On Minor Street =2 SIGNAL WARRANT NOT SATISFIED * Note: 150 vph applies as the lower threshold volume for a minor-street approach with two or more lanes and 100 vph applies as the lower threshold volume for a minor-street approach with one lane. Minor Street - Higher-Volume Approach - VPH167168 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 Major Street - Total of Both Approaches - Vehicles Per Hour (VPH) 1 Lane (Major) & 1 Lane (Minor) 2+ Lanes (Major) & 1 Lane (Minor) OR 1 Lane (Major) & 2+ Lanes (Minor) 2+ Lanes (Major) & 2+ Lanes (Minor) Major Street Approaches Minor Street Approaches *150 *100 18-0085_SIGNAL WARRANT3_URBAN.xlsm Sect. 4C.06 Apx-56Draft----· 147 California Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devlces WARRANT 3, PEAK HOUR (Urban Areas) Traffic Conditions =Existing Plus Project ‐ AM Major Street Name =Princeton Avenue Total of Both Approaches (VPH) =1466 Number of Approach Lanes on Major Street =1 Minor Street Name =Condor Drive High Volume Approach (VPH) =34 Number of Approach Lanes On Minor Street =2 SIGNAL WARRANT NOT SATISFIED * Note: 150 vph applies as the lower threshold volume for a minor-street approach with two or more lanes and 100 vph applies as the lower threshold volume for a minor-street approach with one lane. Minor Street - Higher-Volume Approach - VPH146634 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 Major Street - Total of Both Approaches - Vehicles Per Hour (VPH) 1 Lane (Major) & 1 Lane (Minor) 2+ Lanes (Major) & 1 Lane (Minor) OR 1 Lane (Major) & 2+ Lanes (Minor) 2+ Lanes (Major) & 2+ Lanes (Minor) Major Street Approaches Minor Street Approaches *150 *100 18-0085_SIGNAL WARRANT3_URBAN.xlsm Sect. 4C.06 Apx-57Draft----· 148 California Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devlces WARRANT 3, PEAK HOUR (Urban Areas) Traffic Conditions =Existing Plus Project ‐ PM Major Street Name =Princeton Avenue Total of Both Approaches (VPH) =1676 Number of Approach Lanes on Major Street =1 Minor Street Name =Condor Drive High Volume Approach (VPH) =99 Number of Approach Lanes On Minor Street =2 SIGNAL WARRANT NOT SATISFIED * Note: 150 vph applies as the lower threshold volume for a minor-street approach with two or more lanes and 100 vph applies as the lower threshold volume for a minor-street approach with one lane. Minor Street - Higher-Volume Approach - VPH167699 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 Major Street - Total of Both Approaches - Vehicles Per Hour (VPH) 1 Lane (Major) & 1 Lane (Minor) 2+ Lanes (Major) & 1 Lane (Minor) OR 1 Lane (Major) & 2+ Lanes (Minor) 2+ Lanes (Major) & 2+ Lanes (Minor) Major Street Approaches Minor Street Approaches *150 *100 18-0085_SIGNAL WARRANT3_URBAN.xlsm Sect. 4C.06 Apx-58Draft----· 149 GANDDINI GROUP, INC. 550 Parkcenter Drive, Suite 202, Santa Ana, CA 92705 714.795.3100 | www.ganddini.comDraft 150 ATTACHMENT 6 RESOLUTION NO. 2020-650 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL OF INDUSTRIAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 2019-01 AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2020-02 FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF A 48,787 SQUARE-FOOT, SINGLE-STORY INDUSTRIAL BUILDING AND ASSOCIATED SITE IMPROVEMENTS ON AN UNDEVELOPED 3.46-ACRE SITE AT 5850 CONDOR DRIVE, AND MAKING A DETERMINATION OF EXEMPTION UNDER CEQA IN CONNECTION THEREWITH, ON THE APPLICATION OF PAUL MINOO (4M INVESTMENT CORPORATION) WHEREAS, on November 13, 2019, an application was filed for Industrial Planned Development (IPD) Permit No. 2019-01 and Conditional Use Permit (CUP) No. 2020-02 for the development of a 48,787 square-foot, single-story industrial building and associated site improvement on an undeveloped 3.46-acre site at 5850 Condor Drive; and WHEREAS, at a duly noticed public hearing on June 2, 2020, the Planning Commission considered the agenda report and any supplements thereto and written public comments; opened the public hearing and too and considered public testimony both for and against the proposal; and reached a decision on this matter; and WHEREAS, the Community Development Department has determined that IPD No. 2019-01 and CUP No. 2020-02 is categorically exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 15332 (Class 32: In- Fill Development Projects) of the CEQA Guidelines. NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTATION: The Planning Commission, based on its own independent analysis and judgment, concurs with the Community Development Director's determination that the project is categorically exempt from the requirements of CEQA pursuant to Section 15332 (Class 32: In-Fill Development Projects) of the CEQA Guidelines. The proposed building and is consistent with the General Plan and Zoning regulations. In addition, there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment in that the site will be improved with associated site improvements. No further environmental documentation is needed. SECTION 2. INDUSTRIAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT FINDINGS: Based upon the information set forth in the staff report(s), accompanying studies, and oral and written public testimony, the Planning Commission makes the following findings in accordance with City of Moorpark, Municipal Code Section 17.44.040: 151 Resolution No. 2020-650 Page 2 1. The site design, including structure location, size, height, setbacks, massing, scale, architectural style and colors, and landscaping, is consistent with the goals and policies of the City's General Plan and Zoning Ordinance, as described in the staff report an attachments thereto in that the building design features a contemporary industrial architecture that includes concrete tilt-up panels with rectangular tinted clerestory windows and roll-up truck doors. The scale of the building is compatible with the surrounding business campus directly adjacent to the project site. 2. The site design would not create negative impacts on or impair the utility of properties, structures or uses in the surrounding area in that the building height of 41-feet and 6-inches is generally consistent with the height of the existing industrial buildings in the vicinity. In addition, the building is below the grade level of the adjacent lot. 3. The proposed use is compatible with existing and permitted uses in the surrounding area in that suitable uses, such as, light industrial services, technical research and business office would be permitted under the Industrial Park (M-1) Zoning designation. SECTION 3. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FINDINGS: Based upon the information set forth in the staff report(s), accompanying studies, and oral and written public testimony, the Planning Commission makes the following findings in accordance with City of Moorpark, Municipal Code Section 17.44.040: 1. The proposed use is consistent with the provisions of the General Plan, zoning ordinance, and other applicable regulations; in that Table 17.24.031 of the City Code allows a maximum building height of 60-feet within the Industrial Park (M-1) zone with an approved CUP. 2. The proposed use is compatible with both existing and permitted land uses in the surrounding area, in that the proposed building height of 41-feet and 6-inches is common in the existing business campus. 3. The proposed use is compatible with the scale, visual character, and design of surrounding properties, in that the proposed building height is appropriate for the architecture of the building and consistent with the adjacent industrial buildings. 4. The proposed use would not be obnoxious or harmful, or impair the utility of neighboring property or uses, in that the proposed building is below the grade level from the adjacent lot; therefore, the visual impact of the proposed building is minor and would not present any impacts on adjoining uses. 152 Resolution No. 2020-650 Page 3 5. The proposed use would not be detrimental to the public health, safety, convenience, or welfare, in that the project is substantially consistent with existing industrial development in the vicinity, includes sufficient loading and on- site parking facilities, and will be designed to comply with all applicable codes and regulations. SECTION 4. PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Commission recommends to the City Council approval of IPD No. 2019-01 and CUP No. 2020-02 subject to the Standard and Special Conditions of Approval found in Exhibit A attached. SECTION 5. FILING OF RESOLUTION: The Community Development Director shall cause a certified resolution to be filed in the book of original resolutions. The action of the foregoing direction was approved by the following vote: AYES: Commissioners Aquino, Hamous, Landis, and Chair Haverstock NOES: None ABST Al N: None ABSENT: Commissioner Di Cecco PASSED, AND ADOPTED this 2nd day of June, 2020. Kare Vaughn, AICP Community Development Di Exhibit A -Conditions of Approval Adam Haverstock Chair 153 Resolution No. 2020-650 Page 4 EXHIBIT A STANDARD AND SPECIAL CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR INDUSTRIAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 2019-01 AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2020-02 STANDARD CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL The applicant shall comply with Standard Conditions of Approval for Subdivisions and Planned Developments as adopted by City Council Resolution No. 2009-2799 (Exhibits A), except as modified by the following Special Conditions of Approval. In the event of conflict between a Standard and Special Condition of Approval, the Special Condition shall apply. SPECIAL CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 1. The applicant's acceptance of this permit and/or commencement of construction and/or operations under this permit is deemed to be acceptance of all conditions of this permit. 2. The Conditions of Approval of this permit, City of Moorpark Municipal Code and adopted city policies at the time of the permit approval supersede all conflicting notations, specifications, dimensions, typical sections and the like which may be shown on plans. 3. Industrial Planned Development No. 2019-01 and Conditional Use Permit No. 2020-02 expire one (1) year from the date of its approval unless the use has been inaugurated by issuance of a building permit for construction. The Community Development Director may, at his/her discretion, grant up to two (2) additional one-year extensions for use inauguration of the development permit, if there have been no changes in the adjacent areas and if the applicant can document that he/she has diligently worked towards use inauguration during the initial period of time. The request for extension of this planned development permit must be made in writing, at least thirty (30) days prior to the expiration date of the permit and must be accompanied by applicable entitlement processing deposits. 4. Conditions of this entitlement may not be interpreted as permitting or requiring any violation of law or any unlawful rules or regulations or orders of an authorized governmental agency. 5. The applicant shall defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City and its agents, officers and employees from any claim, action or proceeding against the City or its agents, officers or employees to attack, set aside, void, or annul any approval by the City or any of its agencies, departments, commissions, agents, officers, or 154 Resolution No. 2020-650 Page 5 employees concerning the permit, which claim, action or proceeding is brought within the time period provided by the California Code of Civil Procedure Section 1094.6 and Government Code Section 65009. The City will promptly notify the applicant of any such claim, action or proceeding, and if the City should fail to do so or should fail to cooperate fully in the defense, the applicant shall not thereafter be responsible to defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City or its agents, officers and employees pursuant to this condition. a. The City may, within its unlimited discretion, participate in the defense of any such claim, action or proceeding, if both of the following occur: i. The City bears its own attorney fees and costs; and ii. The City defends the claim, action or proceeding in good faith. b. The applicant shall not be required to pay or perform any settlement of such claim, action or proceeding unless the settlement is approved by the applicant. The applicant's obligations under this condition shall apply regardless of whether a building permit is ultimately obtained, or final occupancy is ultimately granted with respect to the permit. 6. If any of the conditions or limitations of this approval are held to be invalid, that holding shall not invalidate any of the remaining conditions or limitations set forth. 7. The development must be in substantial conformance with the plans presented in conjunction with the application for Industrial Planned Development No. 2019-01 and Conditional Use Permit No. 2020-02, except any modifications as may be required to meet specific Code standards or other conditions stipulated herein. Any future changes to the parking layout shall require review and approval as determined by the Community Development Director consistent with Chapter 17.44 of the Zoning Ordinance. 8. Industrial Planned Development No. 2019-01 and Conditional Use Permit No. 2020-02 are granted or approved with the City's designated approving body retaining and reserving the right and jurisdiction to review and to modify the permit-including the conditions of approval-based on changed circumstances. Changed circumstances include, but are not limited to, major modification of the business; a change in scope, emphasis, size, or nature of the business; the expansion, alteration, reconfiguration, or change of use; or the fact that the use is negatively impacting surrounding uses by virtue of impacts not identified at the time of application for the conditional use permit or impacts that are much greater than anticipated or disclosed at the time of application for the conditional use permit. The reservation of right to review any permit granted or approved under this chapter by the City's designated approving body is in addition to, and not in lieu of, the right of the City, its Planning Commission, City Council and designated approving body to review and revoke or modify any permit granted or 155 Resolution No. 2020-650 Page 6 approved under this chapter for any violations of the conditions imposed on such permit. 9. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall submit a lighting and landscaping plan for review and approval by the Community Development Director, Parks and Recreation Director, and Police Chief that demonstrates compliance with the City's Zoning Ordinance, Landscape Standards and Guidelines, and Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance, and provides a safe and secure environment for the building occupants. 10. Prior to the issuance of a Zoning Clearance for occupancy, the applicant shall submit a Developer Waste Reduction and Recycling Plan to the satisfaction of the Administrative Services Manager. 11. All necessary permits must be obtained from the Building and Safety Division and all construction shall be in compliance with the Moorpark Building Code and all other applicable regulations. 12. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall provide a sample of the glass to be used, along with the manufacturer's specifications for exterior reflectance, for review and approval by the Community Development Director. 13. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, a Lot Merger application for Assessor Parcel Nos.: 513-0-060-175, 513-0-060-185, and 513-0-060-315 must be completed and recorded. 14. Parking areas must be developed and maintained in compliance with the Moorpark Municipal Code, and surfaced with asphalt, concrete, or other surface acceptable to the Community Development Director, City Engineer/Public Works Director, and must include adequate provisions for drainage, National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) compliance, striping and appropriate wheel blocks or curbs in parking areas adjacent to landscaped areas. All parking space striping must be maintained to be clearly visible during the life of the development. 15. A separate sign permit application is required for all proposed signs, which are subject to the review and approval of the Community Development Director. 16. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall submit all fees, including, but not limited to Los Angeles Avenue Area of Contribution Fee, Air Quality Fee, Tree and Landscape Fee, Fire Protection Facilities Fee, Police Facilities Fee, and Library Facilities Fee. All entitlement processing fees must be paid in full prior to the issuance of a building permit. 156 Resolution No. 2020-650 Page 7 17. Prior to issuance of a building permit, applicant shall either submit an in-lieu art fee or indicate a location for on-site public art in compliance with Chapter 17.50 of the Zoning Ordinance. If on-site public art is approved, it must be installed and completed prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. Engineering / Public Works 18. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, provide street improvement plans, including all profiles, for Princeton Avenue and Condor Drive. Street improvement plans shall include all improvements within the existing and proposed right-of-way (curb and gutter, sidewalk, parkways, driveways, etc.). 19. Provide site improvement plans, including grading and drainage, site utilities, storm drainage infrastructure, sewer, domestic water, irrigation water, fire water, etc. 20. Provide a Hydrology and Hydraulic Report, prepared by a State of California Licensed Civil Engineer. Peak storm water runoff mitigation shall comply with Ventura County Design Hydrology Manual and no developed peak condition shall exceed the 10-year developed condition. 21. Provide a revised Storm Water Quality Report, prepared by a State of California Licensed Civil Engineer. Report formatting shall follow the County's Technical Guidance Manual for Storm Water Quality Measures. 22. All proposed storm water quality BMPs shall comply with the most current MS4 permit. 23. Provide Storm Water Quality Operations and Maintenance Manual and Covenant. 24. Provide street dedication and/or easement documents for consideration to the satisfaction of the PW Director/City Engineer. 25. Provide water and sewer improvement plans for reference. 26. Applicant shall install "full-capture" trash excluders approved by the California State Water Resources Control Board for compliance with the State's Trash Policy (State Water Resources Control Board Resolution No. 2015-0019) in all storm drains. Flow capacity calculations showing compliance with the 1-year, 1- hour minimum flow design criteria and applicable bypass sizing shall be identified on Plans and submitted to City Engineer for review and approval prior to installation. An ongoing Operations and Maintenance Plan shall also be submitted to the City Engineer for review. 157 Resolution No. 2020-650 Page 8 27. Project will provide street and frontage improvements along Princeton Avenue. Such frontage improvements include replacing an existing transit/bus shelter with a new one, to the satisfaction of the City Transit Manager. Additionally, the street improvements along Princeton Avenue shall include a bus turnout for the new transit/bus shelter, per Ventura County Road Standards. Ventura County Fire Protection District 28. Access Road Width, Private Roads/Driveways -Private roads shall comply with Public Road Standards. 29. Construction Access -Prior to combustible construction, a paved all-weather access road I driveway suitable for use by a 20 ton Fire District vehicle shall be installed at locations approved by the Fire District. 30. Construction Access Utilities -Prior to combustible construction, all utilities located within the access road and the first lift of the access road pavement shall be installed. A minimum 20 foot clear width shall remain free of obstruction during any construction activities within the development once combustible construction starts. 31. Access Road Location -The access/ driveway shall be extended to within 150 feet of all portions of the exterior walls of the first story of any building and shall be in accordance with Fire District access standards. Where the access roadway cannot be provided, approved fire protection system or systems shall be installed as required and acceptable to the Fire District. 32. Fire Lanes -Prior to construction the applicant shall submit two (2) site plans to the Fire District for approval of the location of fire lanes. Prior to occupancy, all fire lanes shall be posted "NO PARKING-FIRE LANE-TOW AWAY" in accordance with California Vehicle Code, the International Fire Code and current VCFPD Fire Lane Standards. All signs and or Fire Lane markings shall be within recorded access easements. 33. Fire Hydrant Installation -Prior to combustible construction on any parcel, a fire hydrant capable of providing the required fire flow and duration shall be installed and in service along the access road I driveway at a location approved by the Fire District, but no further than 250 feet from the building site. The owner of the combustible construction is responsible for the cost of this installation. 34. Fire Department Clearance -Applicant shall obtain VCFD Form #126 "Requirements for Construction" prior to obtaining a building permit for any new structures or additions to existing structures. 158 Resolution No. 2020-650 Page 9 Ventura County Air Pollution Control District 35. The Permittee shall comply with the provisions of all applicable California State Laws and APCD Rules and Regulations regarding portable construction equipment and construction vehicles. 36. The Permittee shall comply with the provisions of applicable VCAPCD Rules and Regulations, which include but are not limited to, Rule 50 (Opacity), Rule 51 (Nuisance), and Rule 55 (Fugitive Dust). 37. Operations shall be operated in accordance with the Rules and Regulations of the Ventura County Air Pollution Control District, with emphasis on Rule 51, Nuisance. -End- 159 RESOLUTION NO. 2020-3935 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK, APPROVING INDUSTRIAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 2019-01 AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2020-02 FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF A 48,787 SQUARE-FOOT, SINGLE-STORY INDUSTRIAL BUILDING AND ASSOCIATED SITE IMPROVEMENTS ON AN UNDEVELOPED 3.46-ACRE SITE AT 5850 CONDOR DRIVE, AND MAKING A DETERMINATION OF EXEMPTION UNDER CEQA IN CONNECTION THEREWITH, AND DENYING THE REQUEST TO FUND COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE UNDERGROUNDING OF UTILITIES, ON THE APPLICATION OF PAUL MINOO FOR 4M INVESTMENT CORPORATION WHEREAS, on November 13, 2019, an application was filed for Industrial Planned Development (IPD) Permit No. 2019-01 and Conditional Use Permit (CUP) No. 2020-02 for the development of a 48,787 square-foot, single-story industrial building and associated site improvement on an undeveloped 3.46-acre site at 5850 Condor Drive; and submitted a funding request to the City of $469,398.00 for costs associated with the undergrounding of utilities pursuant to the Southern California Edison Rule 20b scenario; and WHEREAS, on June 2, 2020, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 2020-650, recommending to the City Council conditional approval of Industrial Planned Development No. 2019-01 and Conditional Use Permit No. 2020-02, with no consideration of the funding request; and WHEREAS, at a duly noticed public hearing on July 15, 2020, the City Council considered the agenda report for Industrial Planned Development No. 2019-01 and Conditional Use Permit No. 2020-02 and any supplements thereto and written public comments; opened the public hearing and took and considered public testimony both for and against the proposal; and reached a decision on this matter; and WHEREAS, the Community Development Department has determined that IPD No. 2019-01 and CUP No. 2020-02 is categorically exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 15332 (Class 32: In- Fill Development Projects) of the CEQA Guidelines. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTATION: The City Council, based on its own independent analysis and judgment, concurs with the Community Development Director’s determination that the project is categorically exempt from the requirements of CEQA pursuant to Section 15332 (Class 32: In-Fill Development Projects) of the CEQA Guidelines. The proposed building is consistent with the General Plan and Zoning regulations. In addition, there is no substantial evidence that the ATTACHMENT 7 160 Resolution No. 2020-3935 Page 2 project will have a significant effect on the environment in that the site will be developed with associated site improvements. No further environmental documentation is needed. SECTION 2. PLANNED DEVELOPMENT FINDINGS: Based upon the information set forth in the staff report(s), accompanying studies, and oral and written public testimony, the City Council makes the following findings in accordance with City of Moorpark, Municipal Code Section 17.44.040: 1. The site design, including structure location, size, height, setbacks, massing, scale, architectural style and colors, and landscaping, is consistent with the goals and policies of the City’s General Plan and Zoning Ordinance, as described in the staff report and attachments thereto in that the building design features a contemporary industrial architecture that includes concrete tilt-up panels with rectangular tinted clerestory windows and roll-up truck doors. The scale of the building is compatible with the surrounding business campus directly adjacent to the project site. 2. The site design would not create negative impacts on or impair the utility of properties, structures or uses in the surrounding area in that the building height of 41-feet and 6-inches is generally consistent with the height of the existing industrial buildings in the vicinity. In addition, the building is below the grade level of the adjacent lot. 3. The proposed use is compatible with existing and permitted uses in the surrounding area in that suitable uses, such as, light industrial services, technical research and business office would be permitted under the Industrial Park (M-1) Zoning designation. SECTION 3. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FINDINGS: Based upon the information set forth in the staff report(s), accompanying studies, and oral and written public testimony, the City Council makes the following findings in accordance with City of Moorpark, Municipal Code Section 17.44.040: 1. The proposed use is consistent with the provisions of the General Plan, zoning ordinance, and other applicable regulations; in that Table 17.24.031 of the City Code allows a maximum building height of 60-feet within the Industrial Park (M-1) zone with an approved CUP. 2. The proposed use is compatible with both existing and permitted land uses in the surrounding area, in that the proposed building height of 41-feet and 6-inches is common in the existing business campus. The proposed use is compatible with the scale, visual character, and design of surrounding properties, in that the proposed building height is appropriate for the architecture of the building and consistent with the adjacent industrial buildings. 161 Resolution No. 2020-3935 Page 3 3. The proposed use would not be obnoxious or harmful, or impair the utility of neighboring property or uses, in that the proposed building is below the grade level from the adjacent lot; therefore, the visual impact of the proposed building is minor and would not present any impacts on adjoining uses. 4. The proposed use would not be detrimental to the public health, safety, convenience, or welfare, in that the project is substantially consistent with existing industrial development in the vicinity, includes sufficient loading and on- site parking facilities, and will be designed to comply with all applicable codes and regulations. SECTION 4. CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL: The City Council approves Industrial Planned Development No. 2019-01 and Conditional Use Permit No. 2020-02, subject to the Standard and Special Conditions of Approval included in Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. SECTION 5. CITY COUNCIL DENIAL: The City Council denies the Applicant’s funding request of $469,398.00 for costs associated with the undergrounding of utilities pursuant to the Southern California Edison Rule 20b scenario. SECTION 6. CERTIFICATE OF ADOPTION: the City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this resolution and shall cause a certified resolution to be filed in the book or original resolutions. PASSED, AND ADOPTED this 15th day of July, 2020. Janice S. Parvin, Mayor ATTEST: Ky Spangler, City Clerk Exhibit A – Standard and Special Conditions of Approval Industrial Planned Development No. 2019-01 and Conditional Use Permit No. 2020-02 162 Resolution No. 2020-3935 Page 4 EXHIBIT A STANDARD AND SPECIAL CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR INDUSTRIAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 2019-01 AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2020-02 STANDARD CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL The applicant shall comply with Standard Conditions of Approval for Subdivisions and Planned Developments as adopted by City Council Resolution No. 2009-2799 (Exhibit A), except as modified by the following Special Conditions of Approval. In the event of conflict between a Standard and Special Condition of Approval, the Special Condition shall apply. SPECIAL CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 1. The applicant's acceptance of this permit and/or commencement of construction and/or operations under this permit is deemed to be acceptance of all conditions of this permit. 2. The Conditions of Approval of this permit, City of Moorpark Municipal Code and adopted city policies at the time of the permit approval supersede all conflicting notations, specifications, dimensions, typical sections and the like which may be shown on plans. 3. Industrial Planned Development No. 2019-01 and Conditional Use Permit No. 2020-02 expire one (1) year from the date of its approval unless the use has been inaugurated by issuance of a building permit for construction. The Community Development Director may, at his/her discretion, grant up to two (2) additional one-year extensions for use inauguration of the development permit, if there have been no changes in the adjacent areas and if the applicant can document that he/she has diligently worked towards use inauguration during the initial period of time. The request for extension of this planned development permit must be made in writing, at least thirty (30) days prior to the expiration date of the permit and must be accompanied by applicable entitlement processing deposits. 4. Conditions of this entitlement may not be interpreted as permitting or requiring any violation of law or any unlawful rules or regulations or orders of an authorized governmental agency. 5. The applicant shall defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City and its agents, officers and employees from any claim, action or proceeding against the City or its agents, officers or employees to attack, set aside, void, or annul any approval by the City or any of its agencies, departments, commissions, agents, officers, or 163 Resolution No. 2020-3935 Page 5 employees concerning the permit, which claim, action or proceeding is brought within the time period provided by the California Code of Civil Procedure Section 1094.6 and Government Code Section 65009. The City will promptly notify the applicant of any such claim, action or proceeding, and if the City should fail to do so or should fail to cooperate fully in the defense, the applicant shall not thereafter be responsible to defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City or its agents, officers and employees pursuant to this condition. a. The City may, within its unlimited discretion, participate in the defense of any such claim, action or proceeding, if both of the following occur: i. The City bears its own attorney fees and costs; and ii. The City defends the claim, action or proceeding in good faith. b. The applicant shall not be required to pay or perform any settlement of such claim, action or proceeding unless the settlement is approved by the applicant. The applicant's obligations under this condition shall apply regardless of whether a building permit is ultimately obtained, or final occupancy is ultimately granted with respect to the permit. 6. If any of the conditions or limitations of this approval are held to be invalid, that holding shall not invalidate any of the remaining conditions or limitations set forth. 7. The development must be in substantial conformance with the plans presented in conjunction with the application for Industrial Planned Development No. 2019-01 and Conditional Use Permit No. 2020-02, except any modifications as may be required to meet specific Code standards or other conditions stipulated herein. Any future changes to the parking layout shall require review and approval as determined by the Community Development Director consistent with Chapter 17.44 of the Zoning Ordinance. 8. Industrial Planned Development No. 2019-01 and Conditional Use Permit No. 2020-02 are granted or approved with the City’s designated approving body retaining and reserving the right and jurisdiction to review and to modify the permit—including the conditions of approval—based on changed circumstances. Changed circumstances include, but are not limited to, major modification of the business; a change in scope, emphasis, size, or nature of the business; the expansion, alteration, reconfiguration, or change of use; or the fact that the use is negatively impacting surrounding uses by virtue of impacts not identified at the time of application for the conditional use permit or impacts that are much greater than anticipated or disclosed at the time of application for the conditional use permit. The reservation of right to review any permit granted or approved under this chapter by the City’s designated approving body is in addition to, and not in lieu of, the right of the City, its Planning Commission, City Council and designated approving body to review and revoke or modify any permit granted or 164 Resolution No. 2020-3935 Page 6 approved under this chapter for any violations of the conditions imposed on such permit. 9. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall submit a lighting and landscaping plan for review and approval by the Community Development Director, Parks and Recreation Director, and Police Chief that demonstrates compliance with the City’s Zoning Ordinance, Landscape Standards and Guidelines, and Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance, and provides a safe and secure environment for the building occupants. 10. Prior to the issuance of a Zoning Clearance for occupancy, the applicant shall submit a Developer Waste Reduction and Recycling Plan to the satisfaction of the Program Manager. 11. All necessary permits must be obtained from the Building and Safety Division and all construction shall be in compliance with the Moorpark Building Code and all other applicable regulations. 12. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall provide a sample of the glass to be used, along with the manufacturer’s specifications for exterior reflectance, for review and approval by the Community Development Director. 13. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, a Lot Merger application for Assessor Parcel Nos.: 513-0-060-175, 513-0-060-185, and 513-0-060-315 must be completed and recorded. 14. Parking areas must be developed and maintained in compliance with the Moorpark Municipal Code, and surfaced with asphalt, concrete, or other surface acceptable to the Community Development Director, City Engineer/Public Works Director, and must include adequate provisions for drainage, National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) compliance, striping and appropriate wheel blocks or curbs in parking areas adjacent to landscaped areas. All parking space striping must be maintained to be clearly visible during the life of the development. 15. A separate sign permit application is required for all proposed signs, which are subject to the review and approval of the Community Development Director. 16. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall submit all fees, including, but not limited to Los Angeles Avenue Area of Contribution Fee, Air Quality Fee, Tree and Landscape Fee, Fire Protection Facilities Fee, Police Facilities Fee, and Library Facilities Fee. All entitlement processing fees must be paid in full prior to the issuance of a building permit. 165 Resolution No. 2020-3935 Page 7 17. Prior to issuance of a building permit, applicant shall either submit an in-lieu art fee or indicate a location for on-site public art in compliance with Chapter 17.50 of the Zoning Ordinance. If on-site public art is approved, it must be installed and completed prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. 18. Prior to issuance of building permits, Developer shall revise the proposed west elevation (along Princeton Avenue) to provide additional architectural enhancements, subject to the approval of the Community Development Director. 19. Prior to issuance of grading and building permits, Developer shall revise plans to provide fiber cabling, underground conduit, and other appropriate equipment with the latest technology available to ensure that all structures intended for human occupancy are prepared to connect to broadband high-speed internet and communication services. Engineering / Public Works 20. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, provide street improvement plans, including all profiles, for Princeton Avenue and Condor Drive. Street improvement plans shall include all improvements within the existing and proposed right-of-way (curb and gutter, sidewalk, parkways, driveways, etc.). 21. Provide site improvement plans, including grading and drainage, site utilities, storm drainage infrastructure, sewer, domestic water, irrigation water, fire water, etc. 22. Provide a Hydrology and Hydraulic Report, prepared by a State of California Licensed Civil Engineer. Peak storm water runoff mitigation shall comply with Ventura County Design Hydrology Manual and no developed peak condition shall exceed the 10-year developed condition. 23. Provide a revised Storm Water Quality Report, prepared by a State of California Licensed Civil Engineer. Report formatting shall follow the County’s Technical Guidance Manual for Storm Water Quality Measures. 24. All proposed storm water quality BMPs shall comply with the most current MS4 permit. 25. Provide Storm Water Quality Operations and Maintenance Manual and Covenant. 26. Provide street dedication and/or easement documents for consideration to the satisfaction of the City Engineer/Public Works Director. 27. Provide water and sewer improvement plans for reference. 166 Resolution No. 2020-3935 Page 8 28. Applicant shall install “full-capture” trash excluders approved by the California State Water Resources Control Board for compliance with the State’s Trash Policy (State Water Resources Control Board Resolution No. 2015-0019) in all storm drains. Flow capacity calculations showing compliance with the 1-year, 1- hour minimum flow design criteria and applicable bypass sizing shall be identified on Plans and submitted to the City Engineer for review and approval prior to installation. An ongoing Operations and Maintenance Plan shall also be submitted to the City Engineer for review. 29. Project will provide street and frontage improvements along Princeton Avenue. Such frontage improvements include replacing an existing transit/bus shelter with a new one, to the satisfaction of the City’s Transit Program Manager. Additionally, the street improvements along Princeton Avenue shall include a bus turnout for the new transit/bus shelter, per Ventura County Road Standards. Ventura County Fire Protection District (VCFPD) 30. Access Road Width, Private Roads/Driveways - Private roads shall comply with Public Road Standards. 31. Construction Access - Prior to combustible construction, a paved all-weather access road / driveway suitable for use by a 20 ton Fire District vehicle shall be installed at locations approved by the Fire District. 32. Construction Access Utilities - Prior to combustible construction, all utilities located within the access road and the first lift of the access road pavement shall be installed. A minimum 20 foot clear width shall remain free of obstruction during any construction activities within the development once combustible construction starts. 33. Access Road Location - The access / driveway shall be extended to within 150 feet of all portions of the exterior walls of the first story of any building and shall be in accordance with Fire District access standards. Where the access roadway cannot be provided, approved fire protection system or systems shall be installed as required and acceptable to the Fire District. 34. Fire Lanes - Prior to construction, the applicant shall submit two (2) site plans to the Fire District for approval of the location of fire lanes. Prior to occupancy, all fire lanes shall be posted “NO PARKING-FIRE LANE-TOW AWAY” in accordance with California Vehicle Code, the International Fire Code and current VCFPD Fire Lane Standards. All signs and or Fire Lane markings shall be within recorded access easements. 35. Fire Hydrant Installation - Prior to combustible construction on any parcel, a fire hydrant capable of providing the required fire flow and duration shall be installed and in service along the access road / driveway at a location approved by the 167 Resolution No. 2020-3935 Page 9 Fire District, but no further than 250 feet from the building site. The owner of the combustible construction is responsible for the cost of this installation. 36. Fire Department Clearance - Applicant shall obtain VCFPD Form #126 "Requirements for Construction" prior to obtaining a building permit for any new structures or additions to existing structures. Ventura County Air Pollution Control District (VCAPCD) 37. The Permittee shall comply with the provisions of all applicable California State Laws and Air Pollution Control District Rules and Regulations regarding portable construction equipment and construction vehicles. 38. The Permittee shall comply with the provisions of applicable VCAPCD Rules and Regulations, which include but are not limited to, Rule 50 (Opacity), Rule 51 (Nuisance), and Rule 55 (Fugitive Dust). 39. Operations shall be operated in accordance with the Rules and Regulations of the Ventura County Air Pollution Control District, with emphasis on Rule 51, Nuisance. -End- 168 May 21, 2021 Freddy A. Carillo Associate Planner II Community Development Department City of Moorpark 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark, CA 93021 Re: 5850 Condor Drive, Moorpark-Change in Utility Undergrounding Dear Sir: There are three options for undergrounding the utility poles that we would like to present to the City Council. Option No. 1: Known as the "Option 1" was approved by the City Council on July 15, 2020, but costly on the project. Option No. 2: Known as the "Option 2" was requested on February 1, 2021, but not feasible due to easement required by the adjacent property owner (6101 Condor Drive). Property owner refuses to grant easement. Option No. 3: The "Option 3" is the new request and feasible. Two onsite poles would be underground, and one onsite pole would be relocated. However, this option would also require a warning signal light to be relocated in order to add anchor wires to an existing onsite pole. Below you will find the comparison of the costs for the three scenarios. _________ _, Option 1 Option 2 Option 3 RULE 20C RULE 208 RULE 20C (Socal Edison)) 5 Poles 2 Poles 2 Poles + 1 SoCal Edison: $193,317.00 $173,868.00 $105,929.56 Contractor: Total $585,000.00 $247.401.00 $240 700.00 $778,317.00 $421,269.00 $346,629.56 Too costly Not feasible due to offsite Proposed Option Easement In addition, we are requesting to the city council to consider the installation of skylight to the approved Industrial Building. This would save energy by requiring less lighting in the warehouse and less heating. Should you have questions, please do not hesitate to let me know. Thank you,�;110 Paul Minoo ATTACHMENT 6 169 PBOfCTAf'WBf!t'/IIS(Y.Ll,I.). W(IIJ<l;l,.\LWlkl�tQ<Jltlll D PJIIOCIIIIC!l\J .. ID 0 \JC(l��Ol,\1l!Oll!OIIIIO> □ l'Ol>llll{(J,1.IUll D l'UWIIJ'ffl'.:_�--- W1.«ll[Wlfl£ll [) w1..a111,«: ___ 1:11C_ l!W>l(:COlntt>.l(au,.al 0 PUl.nmic-m01.#1Cf11 D i:�•••HIJ!tt um, O[CfO D !Jo1/IIIIIQl[NUl.Cl£/iJIJ,d �<to D t.SOlfO{Jlll)Kl<l'O D l 5�0' P�C56 TO �90!.7 tit. J-1000 .oa 1�.v Option No. 1 Too costly PRELIMINARY Not For Construct.ion 1-:;c;��J':!!•Oi•llt?"Ttff�.:!'£.Lf""" l ~ ~°i'?'!?,:'¾'t:ll G] ~=,~'N9051 MAtHU _,,,-i~,i~~~• main t ~ffilso1i 1·--- IJfl Lt~ ___ ! 170 PMICll!r'll""fY['/JS(lf'II tw::. l..&SlllO(l �,°""'n llll rll!0141tl0.:W IY) lll:°"'-rMT,o,i(Dlil(;Q Iii Nlelll- [I ,c ... ,,,t,C:,1&__ C,,,,Wllt°"""D Ii) CU� c,.l(, JAD.....__ TOil: U1D..._ !WIii: =11101. MW'lll @ '"'"""'l'll:CClll!Q.�· IED cc:,+,n,.,a \LIit� I,{�·· Bl �1i..c.r.w,i;a;,U1bl!] cio�ta.-,,un llII I l�.l•,0.fl-:l'�Sl<tl,)l111llllCAI 1 ll' O.aC1 / / �M l•IA�lll11S1(0hl I I lll.••Wlft1.1•t,J111(n)l•0 .. ,,.lll..c!.ll / .............. Ml. :����::::;;��I: ICN•u;i:.W I! �,; OI' Ul1 !XII( IC IIGII I I :.it :u o be relocated Into ape area. An ent would be red ove I ��,..: ff+H�•= ..... to be relocate � .. ,"' - to remain -.,,,:' Option No. 2 Not Feasible due to offsite easement /4 ,.,,. ,;;r.-· PRELIMINARY Nol For Conslruclion ���l�j lfliiiiisciN -,---- ... __ ., ......... .,,_., ......... ,-,t.,,ftt.rn,..;.r-,, ... r .. t 171 kELOC.\TINC CAP DANl. TO •15:'.i7l!:ll;: � � I � � 4557107[ I 60 I _,,.o 37.5/16 _ \ /Ql>,i 45571 OS[ 163207060 I 60 120/240 4557113 � EXISTING 4557113(0 50 55· Cln,s Cl 4 PJI: \- AC SPAii CUY 9/J2" -200' ll't 1-IIC Sl'llll G\.11' 9/)2°-100" W/2-fC.SI ALL Kif L:t I-C:.P BllK SW Oil 1200',W,?. \6KV C\IP Pl IIDi llt 1-C:JI �lffiQ.. YI/OC R..DIO £l I-...• ---=--I I••,t<��_,�,�· rJ>tx�!iJrOi:r:,.�,:u _/, li.;,:t:tt,;.•;c;;;i;, 2 .,�-"'::ll/l._�� � ��1 TW ))•,O,. le �7•1�1 - 11.:S lllS l£n )H�J I• :,n'iG� • Jal' llS ':°'f:1� � 1:{J l(n$H�7IOJ1J•70.1:-..IOCCIUIS{O\tllU#JI) !(N !l7•XIZ[ I• �7',:J)l • 1016 liS COIHloCI lOCO r� PR[-1:',,'9'CCIICII U([llNC AHO All 0\11.,.SPtCIICN�-J!l,J-OIJS CUSIIM:R 'to'll R{LOCAU: lfUJTrlC UCIH rOR Ni'.W DC 'I I' q,•> \!! "'�""' ,· �-�lllO- [X 2'27◄205( �• C0>1C! � •• l!i�flll,l C{ UUHl)l � !XAC',11 "=1·1"�1'111D«:¥?Uf-.JUKI : :: : �-�:::: :.t::: a I• l?lr-.(JS•.tl' �•ves..111� a l•le.'lfM(lllut\l&U/'9/�.«IClh<: - �- •r.ro1t1111r1/lr'-'Jd,/!-rf.!J'l.l.D amlng : 1,· Clll "',•I•·� 10· ,c.o ).t'll \ \ \ ... ·''lh••I'"•;:., , I Ii ··', I r. I I I 0 f'tiQ EP BfPil!B[UEt!'S cran elocated chor Option No. 3 l0:W<Ll?il..C.1UIIC6.<Jl{O {iJ �Oe&l.lruA!D {iJ 1/C tr,"Ulo\l ""™ Cillil/1 16] l'(MIKCtJ•.tD [iJ mi,,:11,ff:� -�=---Proposed Option t1.1LIUllll1t: __ .ur,_ '1!'11,C: CIJl!IIQ. �\Oi/;11� (ii CREW NOTES: W/'fi TDl755:?8S 011 BDIOVAL ll£L0Co\TI:: CAP DAt-lK REI.OCATE 011 S\\'ITCII EASt:)11::NT HEQUIRED l"RAt'l'IC CONTROL REQUIRED PWR060 REQUIRED PfD,IIUlf".CCCll!afAlll:O"ll lli) C"';(IH;((t,Ul(j..:O'O l!i) 1"�ill�f:!�! Iii c::;1101,w)•ao l!i) FINAL DESIGN APPROVED FOR CONSTRUCTION •�U;f'\./ltl•fh,l)W';,.11;1)1,)l'H(,l,�llffi lil\'11111 C,,.I; H(:�'1C#i!En1 TRAft'IC UCUT WIU. OE RELOCATED .&UIIIW.,110U[OV-,,,.O,I �61"'1.ATIOH�OC•llOll/llC .. OVIJ. •,,· ._ ·--□ \ Lt.ED ;::> . ' ..!.. cci,'r!:~~C:'::f::rflON no,.~•~Jl!I t ~fiiisON I ·-- "ill14o4 o.01 172 E C B C B C BC BCBCBDRA IN DRA IN S C BC BC B C B T D W M ICV ICV WMWM T C BCBCB C B WM WM D S EE S S W MW MW M TSPBSCBCBCBCBDDRA IN DRA IN IC V S63° 4 0 ' 5 9 " E 80.00'N05°09'49"E321.80'N05°09'49"E155.00'S25°58'58"W20.67'4.00' CON C R ET E DRIV E W A Y CONCR E T E DRIVEW A Y CONDOR PRINCETON AVENUEDRIVE VIRGINIA COLONYCON D O R DRIVE PLACEPRINCETON AVENUE30'30'6 0'C S S S S S T T TSPBTSPB WM WM WM WM WM WMWM WM CTVBCBCB CB CB CB CBD D D PM ICV ICV ICV 25'-0" P.U.E. N52°22'46"E 152.31'L=100 .04'R=470 .00' L=135 .61'R=470 .00'=16°31' 5 4 " N82°06'24"W 124.58' N82°06'24"W 150.00' N81°06'24"E 92.73' R=270.00'L=64.83'R=35.00' =106°08'04"R=447.00' =23°12'38"L=181.08'3.21' S82°06'24"E N07°54'20"E 210.47'=12°11'44"N 3 7 ° 3 7 ' 1 4 "W 2 5 7 . 7 3 ' 1 2 ' X 5 0 ' X 1 4 ' L O AD I NG ZON E 1 2 ' X 5 0 ' X 1 4 ' LO A D I NG ZO N E 1 2 ' X 5 0 ' X 1 4 ' LO A D ING Z O N E A A S H TO W B - 4 0 AASHTO WB-409'-0"HC5'9'-0"HC8'-0"9'-0"HC45'-0"5 STALLS @ 9'-0" EA.±6'-2"0.5% SLOPE FLOORSITE ADDRESS LEGAL DESCRIPTION A.P.N. A.P.N. A.P.N. SITE AREA ZONE: CODE: TYPE: OCCUPANCY: BUILDING AREA PARKING REQUIRED INDUSTRIAL (2/1000) PARKING PROVIDED STANDARD CLEAN AIR E.V. DISABLED MOTORCYCLE TOTAL PARKING PROVIDED BICYCLE PARKING INTERIOR (LONG TERM) EXTERIOR (SHORT TERM) F.A.R. COVERAGES BUILDING (F.P. / SITE) PAVING LANDSCAPING HARDSCAPE PROJECT SUMMARY 5850 CONDOR DRIVE, MOORPARK, CA. 90321 LOTS 17,18 AND 31 OF TRACT NO. 3492, BOOK 95, PAGE 30 OF MAPS IN THE OFFICE OF COUNTY RECORDER, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES 513-060-175 LOT 17 513-060-185 LOT 18 513-060-315 LOT 31 150,948.91 S.F. (3.465 AC) M-1 2019 CBC,CFC, CMC, CPC, CEC, CAL GREEN lll - B - FULLY SPRINKLERED S-1, F AND ACCESSORY B 48,787 SF 97 STALLS 85 STALLS 11 STALLS 7 STALLS 5 STALLS 4 STALLS 112 STALLS (2.29/1000) ( 6 ) REQ'D. / ( 6 ) PROV'D. ( 6 ) REQ'D. / ( 8 ) PROV'D. 48,787 SF = .32 / 1 48,787 SF = 32.3202 % 62,253 SF = 41.2411% 36,928 SF = 24.4639 % 2,981 SF = 1.9748 % KEYNOTES 30'-0"DRIVE AISLE15'-0"PER F.D.DH DH DH GL 236'±62'-3"72'± 9 6 ' - 2 "96'DH 10 10 107 7 5 5 6 2 2 9 9 10 10 2 1 1 2 3 4 4 6 18 8 9 10 12 12 14 12 12 25 27'-0"3 STD. STALLS 45'-0"5 STD. STALLS @ 9'-0" EACH 9'-0" 54'-0"6 STD. STALL S @ 9'-0" EACH 10'-0" 81'-0"9 STD. STALLS @ 9'-0" EACH 9'-0" 90'-0"10 STD. STALLS @ 9'-0" EACH 9'-0"9'-0"26'-0"DRIVE AISLE18'-0"10'-0"90'-0" 10 STD. STALLS @ 9'-0" EACH 90'-0" 10 STD. ST A L L S @ 9'-0" EAC H 5'-0" 1 1 ±18'-6" ±19'-6" ±5'-0" 90'-0" 10 STD. S T A L L S @ 9'-0" E A C H 63'- 0 " 7 S T D . S T A L L S @ 9'-0 " E A . ±6'-0" ±11'-6" ±9'-0" ±16'-0" ±18'-6" 9'-0"30'-0"DRIV E AI SL E 9'-0"10'-0"9'-0"19'-0"30'-0"DRIV E AI SLE ±35'-0"14 13 19 10' - 0 " 11 22 22 22 22 1 9 7 2 2 5 5 18 17 7 11 7 7 7 8 21 2121 1 1 1 1 1 7 7 ±3'-6"±3'-6"±34'-0"SETB A C K 20'-0"20'-0"26'-0"DRIVE AISLE18'-0"18' - 0 " 26' - 0 " D R I V E A I S L E ± 1 0 1 ' - 7 " S E T B A CK0.5% SLOPE FLOOR15 15 115 15 4'-0"1 1 23 23 JOIN (N) SIDEWALK TO (E) SIDEWALK (LOCATION APPX.) SEE CIVIL PLANS 24 24 24 24 24 ±34'-0"SETBACK11'-0"68'-6"SCRE E N WALL ± 2 3 5 ' - 9 " R E T A I N I NG W A L L ±241'-4" RETAINING WA L L COORDINATE DRAIN / SUMP PUMP DISCHARGE LOCATION WITH CIVIL PLANS 2 6 ' - 0 "DRIVE A IS LE 1 8 ' - 0 " 1 0 ' - 0 " 4 9 ' - 0 " D R I V E A I S L E 6'-0" 35'-0" SETBACK BY CC&R ENTRY ENTRY 2 0 ' - 0 " 3 8 ' - 0 " 5 3 9 9 9 7 EV CA EV EV CA CA EV CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA EV EV EV 35'-0" SETBACK BY CC&R 6'88'184'-0"BUILDINGONE STORY CONCRETE TILT UP INDUSTRIAL BUILDING 48,787 S.F. / 116 STALLS (2.38/1000) 38'-0" TOP OF PARAPET / 30'-0" CLEAR INTERIOR 304'-0" BUILDING 25'-0" P.U.E. 14 10 4' - 0 " 3 254' TRUNCATED DOMES SEE 9 T-24-8 TRUNCATED DOMES SEE 15'-0"GUYPOLE LINE(E) PP#2774202E RELOCATE 36'-0" SOUTH CA R O V E R H A N G (N) LOCATION OF PP#2774202E2'-0"(N) GUY ANCHOR TO LANDSCAPING PP (E) PP#2774203E TO BE MOVED UNDERGROUND (E) PP#2774201E TO REMAIN (E) PP#2774204E TO BE MOVED UNDERGROUND (E) PP#2774205E WITH (N) 25 FT. LONG GUY ANCHOR TO GROUND - SEE ENLARGED PLAN FOR CLEARANCE AT SIDEWALK 14 29 29 29 29 1. LANDSCAPING WITH 6" HIGH MACHINE FORMED CONCRETE CURB AND AUTOMATIC IRRIGATION CONNECTED TO CENTRAL TIMER, TYP. 2. SEALED A.C. PAVING OVER BASE MATERIAL PER GEOTECHNICAL REPORT , TYP. 3. RECESSED TRUCK LOADING RAMP WITH 6" THICK CONCRETE TILT UP RETAINING WALLS TO MATCH BLDG. AND 6" THICK REINFORCED CONCRETE SLAB WITH BROOM FINISH AND EXP. JOINTS -SEE SOILS REPORT 4. NEW REINFORCED CONCRETE APRON & CURB CUT AND PER CITY OF MOORPARK STANDARD. 5. 3'-6" HIGH NATURAL CONCRETE GUARDWALL AT ENTRY STAIRS / DISABLED ACCES RAMP - CLEARSEALED FINISH, TYP. -SEE EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS. 6. 24" X 24" SCORED & COLORED CONCRETE DRIVE APRON PER SOILS REPORT RECOMMENDATION WITH CONCRETE RIBBON -DAVIS COLOR 61222 "EASTERN TAN" OR EQUAL. 7. 9'-0" X 18'-0" STANDARD PARKING STALL WITH 2'-0" OVERHANG AND PAINTED STRIPES, TYP. - SEE DETAIL'S BELOW. 8. 5'-0" X 10'-0" MOTORCYCLE STALL WITH 6" THICK CONC. SLAB AND PAINTED STRIPES, TYP. - SEE DETAIL'S BELOW. 9. 9'-0" X 18'-0" HANDICAPPED PARKING STALL WITH 5' WIDE LOADING AREA ( 8' WIDE @ VAN ACCESS .) PROVIDE SIGNAGE AND PAINTED STRIPES, TYP. -PER TITLE 24 SEE SHEET T-24-5 (11B-503.4) 10. 4'-0" WIDE (MIN.) X 4" THICK REINFORCED CONC. WALK WITH BROOM FINISH AND SAW CUT CONTROL JOINTS AT 4'-0" O.C., TYP. - PROVIDE TRUNCATED WARNING DEVICES AS REQUIRED. 11. 4'-0" X 9'-0" TREE WELL WITH 6" CONCRETE CURB AND AUTOMATIC IRRIGATION, TYP. 12. 10' X 12' DOCK HIGH OVERHEAD TRUCK DOOR, TYP. 13. 12' X 14' GRADE LEVEL OVERHEAD TRUCK DOOR , TYP. 14. 3' X 7' EXIT / MAN DOOR , TYP. 15. 3'-0" WIDE METAL CANOPY (OPEN) WITH S.S. SCREEN, TYP.- PAINTED FASCIA / FRAMING. 16. DISABLED PATH OF TRAVEL TO MAIN ENTRY, TYP. 17. 6" THICK REINFORCED CONCRETE TRUCK MANUEVERING AREA PER SOILS REPORT RECOMMENDATION. 18. 9'-0" HIGH CONC. TILT UP SCREEN WALL AND TRASH ENCLOSURE WITH SOLID METAL GATES AND SOLID COVER PTD. TO MATCH BUILDING. SANDBLAST WALLS (BOTH SIDES) -SEE DETAILS 5 & 10,SHEET SD5. 19. CONCRETE TRANSFORMER PAD WITH NEW PIPE GUARDS AS REQUIRED - SEE ELECTRICAL PLANS AND 20. 3'-6" HIGH NATURAL CONCRETE GUARDWALL AT ENTRY STAIRS / DISABLED ACCESS RAMP W/ CLEARSEALED FINISH, TYP. 21. PNUEMATICALLY PLACED REINFORCED "SHOTCRETE" RETAINING WALL (HEIGHT VARIES) WITH SCORED "STONE" APPEARANCE EARTHTONE COLORS -BY GENERAL CONTRACTOR UNDER SEPARATE CONTRACT AND PERMIT. 22. 12'(W) X 50'(L) X 14' (H) TRUCK LOADING ZONE PER CITY STANDARD, TYP. (2) 23. NEW BICYCLE RACKS BY CYCLESAFE OR EQ. ON REINFORCED CONC. PAD, TYP. - SEE DETAIL BELOW AND 24. PROVIDE NEW CONCRETE SIDEWALK PER CITY STANDARD PLATE. JOIN TO EXISTING SIDEWALK AS OCCURS -SEE CIVIL PLANS. 25. 3'-0" WIDE METAL CANOPY WITH SOLID ROOF, TYP. - PAINTED. 26. CAR /VAN POOL CLEAN AIR PARKING STALLS, TYP. OF (11) -PLACES. IN THE PAINT USED FOR PARKING STALL STRIPING, SUCH THAT THE LOWER EDGE OF THE LAST WORD ALIGNS WITH THE END OF THE STALL STRIPING BENEATH PARKED VEHICLE. 27. (7) -FUTURE ELECTRIC VEHICLE PARKING STALLS. PROVIDE CONDUIT AND WIRING FOR FUTURE SINGLE ARM OR DUAL ARM CHARGING UNIT FOR EACH STALL. A TOTAL OF (18) ELECTRIC (FUTURE) AND / OR CLEAN AIR PARKING STALLS PROVIDED. PAINT, IN THE PAINT USED FOR PARKING STALL STRIPING, SUCH THAT THE LOWER EDGE OF THE LAST WORD ALIGNS WITH THE END OF THE STALL STRIPING BENEATH PARKED VEHICLE. 28. ACCESSIBILITY SITE SIGNAGE - SEE SHEET T-24-5 (SECT. 11B-502-8.2). 29. 3'-0" WIDE MIN. x LENGTH AS REQUIRED TUNCATED DOMES ON FIN. SURFACE - SEE SHEET T-24-8 (SECT. 11B-705) 29 15'-0"28 28 STRIPE "NO PARKING" IN LOADING AREA STRIPE "NO PARKING" IN LOADING AREA, TYP. NOTE: VERIFY PARKING LOT LIGHT POLE LOCATIONS WITH THE APPROVED ELECTRICAL & LANDSCAPE PLANS SEE DETAIL 2 D-10 8'-0" PATH OF TRAVEL BLDG. DEPT. NOTE: THE DISCHARGE OF POLLUTANTS TO ANY STORM DRAIN SYSTEM IS PROHIBITED PER THE VENTURA COUNTYWIDE MUNICIPAL STORMWATER NPDES PERMIT NO. CAS004002. NO SOLID WASTE, PETROLEUM BY PRODUCTS, SOIL, PARTICULATE, CONSTURCTION WASTE MATERIALS, OR WASTE WATER GENERATED ON CONCTRUCTION SITES OR BY CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES SHALL BR PLACED, CONVEYED OR DISCHARGED INTO THE STREET, GUTTER OR DRAIN SYSTEM. 1 1 9'-0"9'-0"9'-0"9'-0"2'-0" O.H.25'-0"GUY ANCHOR1 A-1.0 26'-0" DRIVE A I S L E ANCHOR5376 N. Sterling Center Drive Westlake Village, CA 91361 Phone 818. 706. 3997 Fax 818. 706. 2453 Date: Job: Drawn by: Revisions Sheet : THIS DOCUMENT, AND THE IDEAS AND DESIGNS HEREIN, AS AN INSTRUMENT OF PROFESSIONAL SERVICES, IS THE PROPERTY OF JDO+ASSOCIATES, INC. AND IS NOT TO BE USED, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, FOR ANY PROJECT WITHOUT THE WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION OF JDO+ASSOCIATES, INC. SITE PLAN SITE PLAN NOV. 16, 2020 AREAS AND COVERAGES ARE PRELIMINARY AND SUBJECT TO CHANGE UPON REVIEW SC: 1" = 20'-0" A-1.0 2018.12 VICINITY MAP N.T.S. PROJECT LOCATION NEW INDUSTRIAL BUILDING FOR 5850 CONDOR DRIVE MOORPARK, CALIF. 4M INVESTMENT CORPORATION TYPICAL PARKING STALLS20'-0" (SEE SITE PLAN)4" WIDE PTD. STRIPE, TYP. TO MATCH CITY PARKING STANDARD FIELD VERIFY PRIOR TO PAINTING 9'-0" (SEE SITE PLAN) 2'-0" (OVERHANG)10'-0"MOTORCYCLE(SEE SITE PLAN)4" WIDE PTD. STRIPE, TYP. TO MATCH CITY PARKING STANDARD FIELD VERIFY PRIOR TO PAINTING 5'-0" EACH MOTORCYCLE (SEE SITE PLAN) MOTORCYCLE STANDARD TRASH ENCLOSURE PIPE SLEEVE FOR CANE BOLTS OPEN AND CLOSED POSITION, TYP. 19'-0"9'-6"CONCRETEAPRON(4) - 4 YD. BINS (3' X 6' X 4') 8" HIGH x 6" WIDE CONC. CURBS, TYP. SOLID CORRIGATED METAL GATES (180° SWING) CONCRETE TILT-UP PANEL - PANEL (PAINTED ALL AROUND)4'-6"9'-0"9'-0"8'-0"CLEARSOLID CORRIGATED METAL ROOF, TYP.6'-0"2"CANE BOLT, TYP.9'-0"NORTH 1 1 PLAN CHECK 01-29-2021 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 22 D-4 13 D-5 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 PW PLAN CHECK 05-11-2021 2 2 2 2 (E) FACE OF CURB TO REMAIN (E) POWER POLE 205E TO REMAIN SEE SCE PLANS FOR ADDT'L INFO. (N) FACE OF CURB SEE CIVIL PLANS CL (E) POLE4.99 FT. EXISTING (E) BACK OF R.O.W. / SIDEWALK (E) R.O.W.(N) 25'-0" GUY ANCHOR TO GROUND SEE SCE PLANS FOR ADDT'L INFO. (E) SIGNAL PULL BOX TO REMAIN FLUSH IN SIDEWALK (E) POLE MOUNTED WARNING SIGNAL IN SIDEWALK TO BE RELOCATED ± 10'-0" TO SOUTH 25'-0"(N) POLE MOUNTED WARNING SIGNAL LOCATION IN SIDEWALK 5'-0"5.54 FT.CL SIGNAL(E) R.O.W.ENLARGED SIDEWALK 4'-0"MIN. CLR. 4'-0" MIN. CLR. 1 2 ATTACHMENT 7 173173 5376 N. Sterling Center Drive Westlake Village, CA 91361 Phone 818. 706. 3997 Fax 818. 706. 2453 Date: Job: Drawn by: Revisions Sheet : THIS DOCUMENT, AND THE IDEAS AND DESIGNS HEREIN, AS AN INSTRUMENT OF PROFESSIONAL SERVICES, IS THE PROPERTY OF JD0+ASSOCIATES, INC. AND IS NOT TO BE USED, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, FOR ANY PROJECT WITHOUT THE WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION OF JDO+ASSOCIATES, INC. SC: 1/16" = 1'-0" NEW INDUSTRIAL BUILDING FOR 5850 CONDOR DRIVE MOORPARK, CALIF. 4M INVESTMENT CORPORATION 2018.12 NORTHWORKINGNORTHAC 1 AC 2 CU 1 EF 2 EF 3 4 EF 1 GV 1 GV EF 1 ROOF PLAN45.00°135.00°304'-0" 236'-0"68'-0" 56'-0"184'-0"40'-0"48'-0"48'-0"48'-0"±96'-2"62'-2 3/4"52'-0"50'-0"52'-0"50'-0"44'-0"72'-0"2 3 4 5 6 5.1 BLDG.CORNERF.O.W.F.O.W.C.L. COL., TYP.BLDG.CORNERF.O.W.F.O.W. F.O.W. A E A E B C D B C D 184'-0"48'-0"48'-0"48'-0"40'-0"B.1 C.1 BLDG. CORNER BLDG. CORNER 68'-0"44'-0"1 717 1 7 304'-0"F.O.W.56'-0"52'-0"50'-0"52'-0"50'-0" 2 3 4 5 6C.L. COL., TYP.C.L. COL., TYP.F.O.W.F.O.W. X X.1 Y Y.1 C.L. COL. AND FACE OF WALL D.1 D.2 1.1 1.2 1.3 5.25.1 D.1 D.29'-0"3'-0"76'-0"17'-0"3'-0"17'-0"3'-0"9'-0"3'-0"AWNING BELOW36'-5"CRICKET A-6.0 ROOF PLAN33'-7"BUILT-UP CRICKET 33'-2"BUILT-UP CRICKET 34'-9"33'-5"35'-8"34'-2"SPRAY-ON INSULATION SEE NOTE #3 ON SHEET D-1, TYP. 1.TOP OF PARAPET TO BE: 38-0" A.F.F. - SEE EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS. 2.ROOF HEIGHTS: 3. SEE MECHANICAL PLANS FOR ALL ROOF OPENINGS AND MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT.0'-0" = TOP OF ROOF PLYWOOD SHEATHING.0'-0" = CLEAR HEIGHTROOF NOTES: ROOF HATCH - COORDINATE WITH FLOOR PLAN 4'-0" x 8'-0" SKYLIGHT / SMOKE VENT 360° FUSIBLE LINK WITH BUILT-UP CRICKET ON HIGH SIDE (UL 793), TYP. 17 D-4 PROVIDE BLOCKING AS REQUIRED, TYP. ROUTE R.D. AND O.F.D. BELOW ROOF LINE AND RUN LEADERLINE DOWN CONCRETE WALL±31'-4"±30'-8"±32'-2"35'-4" 9 D-4 TYP. PARAPET 9 D-4 TYP. PARAPET 9 D-4 TYP. PARAPET 9 D-4 TYP. PARAPET 9 D-4 TYP. PARAPET 9 D-4 TYP. PARAPET PARAPET AT CURTAIN WALL 10 D-4 PARAPET AT CURTAIN WALL 10 D-427'-2"26'-2" EXTENDED ROOF SCREEN - SEE STRUCTURAL EXTENDED ROOF SCREEN - SEE STRUCTURAL POSSIBLE FUTURE SOLAR FIELD POSSIBLE FUTURE SOLAR FIELD 44'-6"±36'-0"±23'-4"SEPT. 29, 2020 DIAGONAL BRACING AT ROOF SCREEN AND CURTAIN WALL SEE STRUCTURAL, TYP. 6 D-4.1 5 D-4.1 R.D. AND O.F.D., TYP. SEE PLUMBING PLANS FOR SIZE 10 D-4 10 D-4 10 D-4 10 D-4 10 D-4 10 D-4 8 D-4 9 D-4.1±33'-8"±31'-5"34'-11"34'-11"±32'-2"±31'-3"33'-7"±31'4"33'-7"±31'-4"33'-6"32'-11"±30'-8"32'-11"32'-11`"±30'-8"33'-7"±31'-4"32'-11"±30'-8"33'-10"33'-7"TOP OF RTU'S ±4'-11" ABOVE ROOF SHT'G. (±39'-1" A.F.F.)33'-7"32'-11"36'-5"±33'-8"36'-5"±33'-8"36'-5"±33'-8"36'-5"±33'-8"36'-5"±33'-8"35'-8"±32'-2"35'-8"±32'-2"35'-8"±32'-2"35'-8"±32'-2"35'-8"±32'-2"35'-8"±32'-2"±31'-5"34'-11"±31'-5"34'-11"±31'-5"34'-11"±31'-5"34'-11"±31'-5"34'-11"34'-2"±30'-8"34'-2"±30'-8"34'-2"±30'-8"34'-2"±30'-8"34'-2"±30'-8"31'-3"30'-8"TOP OF RTU'S ±2'-4" ABOVE ROOF SHT'G. (±36'-9" A.F.F.) TOP OF RTU'S ±2'-9" ABOVE ROOF SHT'G. (±37'-2" A.F.F.) TOP OF RTU'S ±2'-9" ABOVE ROOF SHT'G. (±37'-2" A.F.F.) TOP OF RTU'S ±2'-0" ABOVE ROOF SHT'G. (±36'-1" A.F.F.) TOP OF RTU'S ±2'-0" ABOVE ROOF SHT'G. (±36'-1" A.F.F.) TOP OF RTU'S ±2'-9" ABOVE ROOF SHT'G. (±37'-2" A .F.F.) TOP OF PARAPET +38'-0" A.F.F. TOP OF PARAPET +38'-0" A.F.F. TOP OF ROOF SCREEN +41'-6" A.F.F. TOP OF ROOF SCREEN +41'-6" A.F.F. CLASS "A" COOL ROOF SEE SHEET D-1, NOTE #3 3 D-10 ATTACHMENT 8 174174 RESOLUTION NO. 2021-______ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING MODIFICATION NO. 1 TO INDUSTRIAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMIT (IPD) NO. 2019-01 AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (CUP) NO. 2020-02 TO MODIFY CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL OF A PREVIOUSLY- APPROVED INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT PROJECT LOCATED AT 5850 CONDOR DRIVE REQUIRING ALL UTILITIES TO BE PLACED UNDERGROUND, TO PERMIT THE INSTALLATION OF SKYLIGHTS, AND MAKING A DETERMINATION OF EXEMPTION UNDER CEQA IN CONNECTION THEREWITH, ON THE APPLICATION OF PAUL MINOO FOR 4M INVESTMENT CORPORATION WHEREAS, on July 15, 2020, the City Council conducted a duly noticed public hearing and adopted Resolution No. 2020-3935 approving IPD No. 2019-01 and CUP 2020-02 to allow the development of a 48,787 square–foot, single-story industrial building and associated site improvements on an undeveloped 3.46-acre of property addressed 5850 Condor Drive; and WHEREAS, on February 1, 2021, an application was filed for Modification No. 1 to IPD No. 2019-01 and CUP No. 2020-02 to modify conditions of approval requiring all utilities to be placed underground and to permit the installation of skylights at 5850 Condor Drive; and WHEREAS, at a duly noticed public hearing on April 7, 2021, the City Council considered the agenda report for Modification No. 1 to IPD No. 2019-01 and CUP No. 2020-02 and opened and subsequently continued the public hearing to a date uncertain without receiving public comments; and WHEREAS, at a duly noticed public hearing on June 16, 2021, the City Council considered an updated agenda report for Modification No. 1 to IPD No. 2019-01 and CUP No. 2020-02 and any supplements thereto and written public comments; opened the public hearing and took and considered public testimony both for and against the proposal; and reached a decision on this matter; and WHEREAS, the Interim Community Development Director has determined that this project, as amended by Modification No. 1, is consistent with the environmental determination for IPD No. 2019-01 and CUP No. 2020-02 and, furthermore, that Modification No.1 is exempt from environmental review pursuant to Section 15301 (Class 1: Existing Facilities) of the California Environmental Quality Act because the request is limited to the undergrounding of publicly-owned utilities and the addition of skylights to a previously-approved development. Therefore, no further environmental documentation is required. ATTACHMENT 9 175 Resolution No. 2021-_____ Page 2 NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTATION: The City Council concurs with the Interim Community Development Director that Modification No. 1 to IPD No. 2019-01 and CUP No. 2020-02 is exempt from environmental review, pursuant to Section 15301 (Class 1: Existing Facilities) of the California Environmental Quality Act. SECTION 2. CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL: The City Council hereby approves Modification No. 1 to IPD No. 2019-01 and CUP No. 2020-02, subject to all Conditions of Approval included in Exhibit A. SECTION 3. CERTIFICATE OF ADOPTION: The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this resolution and shall cause a certified resolution to be filed in the book of original resolutions. PASSED, AND ADOPTED this 16th day of June, 2021. Janice S. Parvin, Mayor ATTEST: Kyle Spangler, City Clerk Exhibit A – Special Conditions of Approval for Modification No. 1 to Industrial Planned Development No. 2019-01 and Conditional Use Permit No. 2020-02 176 Resolution No. 2021-_____ Page 3 EXHIBIT A SPECIAL CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR MODIFICATION NO. 1 TO INDUSTRIAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 2019-01 AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2020-02 1. Prior to issuance of grading permit, the Applicant shall submit revised plans depicting the undergrounding of two on-site poles and the relocation of the southerly most on- site pole consistent with approved plans submitted with Modification No. 1. Any further exceptions must be reviewed and approved by the City Council. This special condition of approval shall supersede Standard Condition of Approval No. 145. 2. Skylights are permitted consistent with plans approved by the Community Development Director. This special condition shall supersede Standard Condition of Approval No. 43. 3. Except as specifically modified by this resolution, all conditions of approval and requirements of Resolution No. 2020-3935 shall remain in full force and effect. 177