HomeMy WebLinkAboutAGENDA REPORT 2021 0223 REG PC ITEM 10ACITY OF MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA
Planning Commission Meeting
of February 23, 2021
Consent Item was Continued to
Next Regular Meeting of the
ACTION: Planning Commission.
BY: K. Valencia
Item: 10.A.
A. Consider Approval of the Special Planning Commission Meeting Minutes of
September 10-2020. Staff Recommendation: Approve the minutes.
Item: 10.A.
MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION
Moorpark California September 10, 2020
A Special Meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Moorpark was held on
September 10, 2020, in the Council Chambers of said City located at 799 Moorpark
Avenue, Moorpark, California.
1. CALL TO ORDER:
Chair Haverstock called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m.
2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE:
Commissioner Hamous led the Pledge of Allegiance.
3. ROLL CALL:
Present: Commissioners Aquino, Hamous, Landis, and Chair
Haverstock (all attending via video conference).
Staff Present: Karen Vaughn, Community Development Director, Douglas
Spondello, Planning Manager; and Joyce Figueroa,
Administrative Assistant II.
4. PROCLAMATIONS AND COMMENDATIONS:
None.
5. PUBLIC COMMENT:
Zoom Registrants
Andrew Gonzalez inquired about resources for the Fiscal Year 20/21 City budget.
Charles Lew voiced his support for the High Street Project and excited to see this
type of development come to fruition.
6. REORDERING OF, AND ADDITIONS TO, THE AGENDA:
Planning Manager Spondello requested that Item 7. be heard before Item 9.
Minutes of the Planning Commission
Moorpark, California Page 2 September 10, 2020
8. PUBLIC HEARINGS: (next Resolution No. PC -2020-653)
A. Consider a Resolution Recommending to the City Council Approval of
Residential Planned Development Permit No. 2018-01, Development
Agreement No. 2018-01, Disposition and Development Agreement No.
2018-01, and Adoption of a Mitigated Negative Declaration under CEQA in
Connection Therewith, for a Mixed -Use Development consisting of 79
Residential Units, 13,628 Square Feet of Commercial Floor Area, and
Associated Land Improvements Located at 226 High Street in the
Downtown Specific Plan Area on the Application of The Daly Group, Inc.
Staff Recommendation: 1) Open the public hearing, accept public
testimony and close the public hearing; and 2) Adopt Resolution No. 2020-
653 recommending to the City Council adoption of the Initial
Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration and associated Mitigation Monitoring
and Reporting Program (MMRP), Conditional Approval of Residential
Planned Development (RPD) No. 2018-01, Development Agreement (DA)
No. 2018-01, and Disposition and Development Agreement (DDA) No.
2018-01. (Staff: Karen Vaughn)
Ms. Vaughn gave the staff report.
A discussion followed among the Commissioners and staff, which focused
on the following: 1) Train station fagade height; and 2) Ventura County
Transportation Commission (VCTC) license agreement parking
requirements and extension of the agreement after five years; and 3)
Location of primary access doors.
Chair Haverstock opened the public hearing.
Zoom Attendees
Vince Daly, The Daly Group, Inc. Daily Family Companies, discussed the
project and presented a slide show emulation of the proposal. Mr. Daly
stated they are excited about the design of the project and want to add to
the character and charm of High Street.
A discussion followed among the Commissioners and Mr. Daly regarding:
1) Pepper trees; 2) Intent to keep the architectural style and theme similar
to the existing buildings on High Street; and 3) Installing grease traps and
hoods in the commercial units.
Minutes of the Planning Commission
Moorpark California Page 3 September 10, 2020
Dean Wallraff, Advocates for the Environment, Attorney representing the
Committee to Preserve Historic High Street spoke in opposition of the
project and concerns regarding:
• Parking.
• Environmental analysis pertaining to noise, air quality, hazardous
materials and greenhouse gas.
• Project description is not consistent in terms of square footage.
• A Phase 1 hazardous materials assessment should be done before
the site is sold.
David Ross, a High Street property owner, CE&D Mabry Family Limited
Partnership, High Street property owner, spoke in support of the project
and is excited by the vision and the dimensions that have been presented.
Joe Power, Rincon Consultants, stated he assisted the City with the
preparation of the MND and available to answer any questions regarding
the project and CEQA review.
Hugh Riley, Moorpark Foundation for the Arts, president, expressed
support for the proposed project.
Chris Barrett, a High Street business owner, spoke in support of the
project.
Patricia Torres, a Moorpark resident, supports revitalizing High Street.
She expressed opposition about the proposed residential units on High
Street, and concerns regarding parking space to accommodate shoppers
and residents, and increased traffic.
Sharon Noel, a Moorpark resident, spoke in support of the project and
concerns regarding parking and utilizing Charles Street as potential guest
parking spaces.
Jeffrey Brodsly, a High Street Moorpark business owner, spoke in support
of the proposed project and stated we need revitalization in Moorpark.
Kacy Waxman, a Moorpark resident, spoke in support of the proposed
project and would love to see High Street developed.
Joseph Cappuccino, a Moorpark resident, spoke in support of the
proposed project.
Daniel Groff, a High Street business owner, spoke in support of the
proposed project and is excited for the potential to help establish High
Street as a destination place that it deserves to be.
Minutes of the Planning Commission
Moorpark, California Page 4 September 10, 2020
Andrew Gonzales, a Moorpark resident and cyclist, inquired about
consideration for cyclists and dedicated parking spots for cyclists built into
the residential structures.
William Sayre, a Moorpark resident, inquired about the type of strategies
the applicant has to maintain the small town -feel of Moorpark, objectives,
and what kind of proportion in ideal state does the applicant have for local
businesses vs. large businesses.
Terri Doria, a Moorpark resident, spoke in support of the project and
concerns regarding the impact of the traffic at 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. that
drive toward Moorpark Country Club and concern about peppertrees and
bougainvilleas on High Street that have died.
Shane Judd, a High Street business owner, spoke in support of the
proposed project and is excited to see this project happen.
The clerk read into the record a statement prepared by Eliza Kropp, a
Moorpark Resident, which expressed her support for the proposed project.
Gregory Horton, a Moorpark resident, spoke in support of the proposed
project and inquired about public restrooms in the center of the
development and who would maintain them; was a geotechnical report
done and is there anything the developer can do to mitigate the excessive
vibration coming from the trains; and channel mitigation on the back wall
of the development. Mr. Horton recommended a tall chain link fence in
the back of the development that would not attract graffiti and keep kids
from getting out on the tracks; and asked that the City be flexible and
consider repurposing vacant spaces as residential units, if unable to fill the
spaces.
Christian Gonzaga, a Moorpark resident, spoke in support of the proposed
project good to revitalize the downtown area.
Vince Daly, The Daly Group, Inc., applicant responded to comments and
discussed the project proposal as a local targeted commercial area.
Applicant stated that the proposed businesses and restaurants are
intended to be local Moorpark/Ventura County companies that can create
a culture.
Applicant addressed the train stop and stated that it is phenomenal and
the design was important, as was listening to the community. He stated
that efforts are being taken to do the right thing by reducing emissions,
reducing cars. Mr. Daly stated that as a trans -oriented development, "this
is a goldmine", because there is no other city that has as transit center in
their downtown.
Minutes of the Planning Commission
Moorpark, California Page 5 September 10, 2020
Applicant addressed Bicycles and cyclists. Bike racks will be available for
bicycles to park. There will also be bike repair stations.
Regarding ground shaking, included in the project cost is attention to the
ground vibration as well as building with argon gas windows to reduce
noise levels inside the units. The expected construction timeline to build is
18 months.
Commissioner Hamous asked if public restrooms were part of the plan,
Mr. Vince Daly responded that there are no plans for a public only
restroom at this location.
In response to Chair Haverstock, Mr. Spondello stated there were no
additional speakers for this item.
Chair Haverstock closed the public hearing.
A discussion followed among the Commissioners supporting the project.
MOTION: Commissioner Landis moved and Commissioner Aquino seconded a
motion to Adopt Resolution No. 2020-653 recommending to the City Council
adoption of the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration and associated
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP), Conditional Approval of
Residential Planned Development (RPD) No. 2018-01, Development Agreement
(DA) No. 2018-01, and Disposition and Development Agreement (DDA) No.
2018-01. The motion carried by unanimous voice vote.
7. ANNOUNCEMENTS, FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS, AND REPORTS ON
MEETINGS/CONFERENCES ATTENDED BY THE COMMISSION:
Mr. Spondello announced the resignation of Commissioner Di Cecco effective
September 3, 2020 and stated Mr. Di Cecco will serve as Chair of the General
Plan Advisory Committee (GPAC). Mr. Di Cecco will be recognized at the
September 16, 2020 City Council meeting.
On September 2, 2020 City Council kicked off the City's General Plan. The first
meeting will be held on October 1, 2020.
Minutes of the Planning Commission
Moorpark, California Page 6 September 10 2020
9. PRESENTATION/ACTION/DISCUSSION:
The Commissioners thanked Mr. Di Cecco for serving on the Planning
Commission for twenty-two years from 1998 to 2020.
10. CONSENT CALENDAR:
MOTION: Commissioner Hamous moved and Commissioner Landis seconded a
motion to approve the Consent Calendar. The motion carried by unanimous
voice.
A. Consider Approval of the Regular Planning Commission Meeting Minutes
of June 23, 2020. Staff Recommendation: Approve the minutes.
11. ADJOURNMENT:
MOTION: Commissioner Landis moved and Commissioner Aquino seconded a
motion to adjourn. The motion carried by voice unanimous voice vote. The time
was 9:19 p.m.
Adam Haverstock
Chair
Karen Vaughn, AICP
Community Development Director