HomeMy WebLinkAboutAGENDA REPORT 2022 0105 CCSA REG ITEM 08ACITY OF MOORPARK,
CALIFORNIA
City Council Meeting
of January 05, 2022
ACTION APPROVED STAFF
RECOMMENDATION. (VOICE
VOTE: UNANIMOUS).
BY K. Spangler.
A. Third Public Hearing to Receive Public Comments on Proposed Council Redistricting
Mapping Alternatives; and if Council Completes its Map Selection Process, Provide
Direction for Introduction of an Ordinance Adopting a Council District Map Based on
2020 Census Results. Staff Recommendation: 1) Receive presentation from the City’s
demographer consulting firm, National Demographics Corporation, Inc. on the draft
maps prepared for consideration based on prior direction; and ; 2) Open the public
hearing and receive public comment and input regarding “communities of interest” and
the draft maps presented for consideration and close the public hearing; and 3) Provide
direction to staff and NDC regarding potential revisions to proposed maps and for
introduction of an Ordinance at the fourth public hearing scheduled on February 2,
2022. (Staff: Ky Spangler, City Clerk)
Item: 8.A.
MOORPARK CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA REPORT
TO: Honorable City Council
FROM: Ky Spangler, City Clerk
PJ Gagajena, Assistant City Manager
DATE: 01/05/2022 Regular Meeting
SUBJECT: Third Public Hearing to Receive Public Comments on Proposed Council
Redistricting Mapping Alternatives; and if Council Completes its Map
Selection Process, Provide Direction for Introduction of an Ordinance
Adopting a Council District Map Based on 2020 Census Results
SUMMARY
The Public Hearing scheduled for January 5, 2022, represents the third in a series of four
public hearings required under the California Elections Code Section 21600 et seq. as part
of redistricting process undertaken following each decennial federal Census. The first
public hearing was held on October 20, 2021, where the City Council received a
presentation from the City's demographic consultant, National Demographics Corporation,
Inc. (NDC) on the requirements under the federal Voting Rights Act and the California
Voting Rights Act (CVRA); received a report on the 2020 Census results relative to
Moorpark’s population and demographic data; and received information on the mapping
tools available to the public for participation in the redistricting mapping process. The
second public hearing was held on December 1, 2021, which recapped the redistricting
requirements and criteria, reviewed Moorpark’s 2020 Census results, and included a
demonstration of the online mapping tools available for public participation by NDC. Staff
also received input and direction from the City Council on parameters to consider for
potential maps to be produced by NDC as part of the redistricting process. Any maps
produced by NDC will be in addition to maps provided by residents.
BACKGROUND
Transition to District-Based Elections
On April 3, 2019, the City of Moorpark completed its transition from an “at-large” form of
election to a district-based system through the adoption of Ordinance No. 467 which
adopted Map 401b creating four City Council voting district boundaries, establishing the
sequence of election for each district, with the mayoral position continuing to be elected “at-
large” for a two-year term. The first district-based election was held on November 3, 2020,
Item: 8.A.
1
Honorable City Council
01/05/2022 Regular Meeting
Page 2
with representatives from Districts 2 and 4 being elected to four-year terms; the second
district-based election is scheduled on November 8, 2022, where representatives from
Districts 1 and 3 will be elected to four-year terms of office. A history of the public hearings
held from October 11, 2018, to April 3, 2019, to establish the City Council district
boundaries can be located on the City’s website at: https://www.moorparkca.gov/districts,
including the staff reports, videos and other relevant information.
Requirement for Redistricting and Redistricting Deadline
Following every decennial federal Census, the process of redistricting is undertaken at the
federal, state, and local levels to review and adjust district boundaries based on population
changes identified through the Census process. The requirements and timelines to be
followed to complete the redistricting process is set in the California Elections Code 21600
et seq., known as the Fair Maps Act. The Fair Maps Act requires that a minimum of four
public hearings be held to receive public input, prepare and consider population-balanced
maps, and adopt a district map to be utilized until the next decennial federal Census is
conducted.
Pursuant to the requirements set forth in the Elections Code, the City of Moorpark must
complete the redistricting process, “not later than 205 days before the city’s next regular
election occurring on or after July 1, 2022” (Elections Code Section 21602(a)(3)). The
City’s next regularly scheduled election will be held on November 8, 2022; therefore, the
City must adopt a revised, population-balanced Council District map on or before April 17,
2022, which is 205 days prior to the next City Council election.
To meet the timeframes outlined in the Elections Code, the City established a schedule of
four public hearing dates – October 20 and December 1, 2021, and January 5 and
February 2, 2022 – in order to complete redistricting process. This schedule provides a
small buffer should additional time be required to adopt a population-balanced map prior to
the April 17, 2022, deadline.
This evening’s public hearing represents the third in the series of hearings required under
the Fair Maps Act in order to complete the redistricting process for the City. The goals of
this public hearing include: 1) reviewing proposed district maps submitted by members of
the public and maps prepared by NDC based on City Council direction at the December 1,
2021, hearing; 2) conducting the third public hearing to receive testimony from residents on
redistricting criteria including “communities of interest” and on the proposed draft maps for
consideration; 3) receiving feedback from the City Council on proposed draft maps that are
legally compliant with the Fair Maps Act requirements, and direction on any desired
refinements; and 4) receiving direction from City Council on final map(s) it wishes to
consider in conjunction with introduction of an ordinance at the public hearing scheduled on
February 2, 2022.
2
Honorable City Council
01/05/2022 Regular Meeting
Page 3
Redistricting Public Hearing Recap
On October 20, 2021, the first redistricting public hearing was held and included an
overview of the redistricting requirements and process including an overview of the federal
Voting Rights Act and the California Voting Rights Act (CVRA) criteria; presentation of
population results and demographic summary of the current Council districts based on the
2020 Census population data; discussion of the various mapping tools forthcoming for the
public and interested parties to use; and provided the opportunity for public testimony and
input on the redistricting process for the redrawing of Council District boundaries. No public
testimony was received at the first hearing.
On December 1, 2021, the second public hearing was held where a review of the
redistricting requirements and criteria to be considered, including a discussion of
“communities of interest” was presented; a detailed review of 2020 Census results and the
effect on population balance within the existing Council Districts was discussed; a
presentation of the various mapping tools available for the public to prepare and submit
draft maps for Council consideration was given; Council direction was provided to staff and
NDC on draft maps to be prepared for consideration to achieve population-balanced
districts; and an opportunity for public testimony was provided. No public testimony was
received at the second hearing.
DISCUSSION
Fair Maps Act - Redistricting Requirements and Criteria
The criteria provided in the Fair Maps Act that must be considered when modifying and
adopting Council district boundaries was discussed in detail at the public hearings held on
October 20 and December 1, 2021, and are briefly recapped below. The criteria below
must be considered in the order listed, and represents those criteria which must be
considered as part of district maps presented for review.
• Council districts shall be geographically contiguous
• To the extent practicable, the geographic integrity of any local neighborhood or
local community of interest shall be respected in a manner that minimizes its
division
• Council district boundaries should be easily identifiable and understandable by
residents
• Council districts shall be drawn to encourage geographical compactness
In addition to the criteria required under the Fair Maps Act, additional possible features
defining “communities of interest” might include, but be not limited to: 1) school district
boundaries; 2) natural division lines such as major roads, hills, or highways;
3) neighborhood landmarks or areas around parks; 4) legislative/election concerns,
common issues or neighborhood activities; 5) shared demographic characteristics,
including but not limited to: similar levels of income, education, language spoken at home,
limited English speaking households, single-family and multi-family housing areas, etc.
3
Honorable City Council
01/05/2022 Regular Meeting
Page 4
At the second public hearing, the City Council received a presentation on the 2020 Census
results which were discussed by NDC with respect to the impact of new total population
figures on the existing Council District map and where population changes have occurred.
The principles of equal population or “population balance,” “ideal population,” and
acceptable population deviation were discussed and are outlined below.
Equal Population, Population Balance, and Ideal Population
The Fair Maps Act requires that “council districts shall be substantially equal in population
as required by the United States Constitution.” (Elections Code Section 21601(a)). It
should be noted that under federal law, precisely equal population is not required for local
government districts, and federal courts have indicated that total population deviation under
10% is legally permissible, as long as the deviation is justified for the purposes of legitimate
redistricting criteria under state law. Therefore, a total deviation of 10% or below is the
recommended target for proposed local district maps in order to maintain legal compliance
with federal and state law. Moorpark’s initial four-district map, Map 401(b), reflected a total
population deviation of 8.89%, using the data available at the time of its adoption.
The 2020 Census results for Moorpark reported a new total population of 36,326, an
increase of 1,905 residents from the 2010 Census total population of 34,421. Applying the
federal requirement of substantially equal population, that is, an equal population for each
voting district, the 2020 total population is divided by the number of districts to determine
the new “ideal population” number for Moorpark’s four Council Districts. Therefore, based
on the 2020 Census results, the new “ideal population” for Moorpark’s Council Districts is
9,081 (36,326 / 4 = 9081.5).
The total population numbers from the 2020 Census, when applied to the existing voting
district boundaries, result in the following by-district and total population deviations:
Council District 1 2 3 4 Total
2020 Census 9,139 9,066 8,203 9,918 36,326
Deviation from ideal 58 -16 -879 837 1,715
% Deviation 0.63% -0.17% -9.67% 9.21% 18.88%
A full breakdown of the 2020 Census demographic data by district is provided as
Attachment 1 to the staff report.
The table above reveals a “population imbalance” in District 3 and 4 of -9.67% and 9.21%
respectively, and a total population deviation of 18.88%. This total population deviation
exceeds the 10% standard considered to be legally compliant and therefore adjustments to
voting district map boundaries are required. However, it should be noted that absolute
number of individuals required to achieve population balance is small.
4
Honorable City Council
01/05/2022 Regular Meeting
Page 5
Direction from City Council
After review of the 2020 Census population results as part of the second public hearing,
and discussion of the results’ effect on the existing districts, the City Council provided
direction to staff and NDC to prepare several draft maps to achieve population balance for
consideration at the third public hearing. Direction included the preparation of drafts maps
depicting “minimal change” options to achieve legally compliant population deviations, and
to explore options to remove the “hook” between Districts 2 and 3. Draft maps
implementing the Council’s direction are included as attachments to the staff report and
have been posted on NDC’s “interactive map” site accessible through
www.moorparkca.gov/districts.
Adopted Map 401(b) followed the Elections Code criteria in place at the time initial district
boundaries were established and used natural and man-made features to define
boundaries to the extent possible in order to keep districts geographically contiguous; keep
communities of interest together; and create boundaries easily identifiable by residents.
These elements, as well as the revised requirements included in the Fair Maps Act, should
be kept in mind when evaluating the proposed draft maps developed based on Council
direction.
Option 1 – Removing the “Hook” between Districts 2 and 3 (NDC “Green” Map)
At the December 1, 2021, public hearing, City Council directed staff and NDC to explore
alternatives which would remove the “hook” in District 3. Given that District 3 is under-
populated as a result of the 2020 Census results, removing population from this area in
order to remove the “hook” creates a population imbalance in District 2 and does not relieve
the overpopulation in District 4. The additional boundary changes that would be required to
achieve compliance would result in some voters being moved from districts that are not
scheduled to vote in 2022 and therefore would lose the opportunity to cast a ballot for a
Councilmember in the November 2022 election.
The total population deviation in this alternative is 23.93% and therefore is not legally
compliant in its current form. Additional boundary adjustments in Districts 2 and 4 would be
required in order to achieve a legally compliant map within the 10% deviation.
Option 2 – Population Balancing Districts 3 and 4 (NDC “Orange” Map)
Districts 3 and 4 experienced a population imbalance based on the 2020 Census results,
with District 3 having too few and District 4 having too many residents. In order to restore
balance in these two districts, NDC explored alternatives to shift some of the population in
District 4 into District 3.
Based on the existing District 4 boundaries, in order to shift population out of District 4 it
was necessary to move population across the Arroyo Simi to the south to bring 840
residents into District 3. In addition to moving population across a natural boundary, this
change also requires dividing a potential community of interest. Notwithstanding these two
factors, this minimal change achieves a legally compliant population balanced map.
5
Honorable City Council
01/05/2022 Regular Meeting
Page 6
Current District Map “Orange” District Map
Change crossing Arroyo Simi
This map also moves a small portion of District 4 north of High Street into District 2 (the
Civic Center area), moving 73 residents from District 4 into District 2.
Current District Map “Orange” District Map
Change north of High Street
The total population deviation for this mapping alternative is 1.48%.
Option 3 – Minimal Change Map Affecting Districts 2, 3 and 4 (NDC “Yellow” Map)
NDC explored additional alternatives for achieving a population balanced map that takes
into account Council’s desire to eliminate (or smooth) the “hook” in District 3 while keeping
in mind the criteria specified in the Fair Maps Act (including contiguous geography,
maintaining communities of interest, easily identifiable boundaries, and geographical
compactness) and endeavoring to not disenfranchise voters by moving them between
voting and non-voting districts.
This proposed alternative achieves population balance by moving District 4 residents into
District 2 in two locations, one north of High Street (the Civic Center area) as noted in the
Orange Map alternative, the second south of State Route 118/Los Angeles Avenue, west of
Tierra Rejada Road (the Heather Glen neighborhood). Districts 2 and 4 are on the same
voting sequence and therefore these changes do not alter the existing voting sequence for
residents in these locations.
6
Honorable City Council
01/05/2022 Regular Meeting
Page 7
Current District Map “Yellow” District Map
Change at southeast corner of
Los Angeles Avenue/Tierra Rejada Road
This proposed alternative also addresses the “hook” in District 3 by moving population from
District 2 into District 3 with Arroyo Vista Community Park becoming the northern boundary
of District 3. District 2 residents in Mountain Meadows north of Mountain Trail Street south
of Arroyo Vista Community Park, and north of Williams Ranch Road west of Brookhurst
Court have been moved into District 3, creating a smoother transition between the existing
Districts. The movement of population from District 2 into District 3 also allows these
residents another opportunity to vote as District 3 will cast ballots in the November 2022
election.
Current District Map “Yellow” District Map
Change between Districts 2 and 3
The total population deviation for this mapping alternative is 3.31%.
7
Honorable City Council
01/05/2022 Regular Meeting
Page 8
FISCAL IMPACT
The costs to conduct the redistricting process, including costs for advertising for a series of
four public hearings, bilingual translation costs for hearing notices and outreach
communications, bilingual translator meeting attendance, and City Attorney costs are
allocated in the adopted budget for Fiscal Year 2021/22.
COUNCIL GOAL COMPLIANCE
This action is consistent with City Council Strategy 2 – “Equity and Inclusion”; Goal 2 –
“Practice Respect, Equity and Inclusion Citywide”; and Objective 5 (2.5) – “Complete
redistricting process.”
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
1. Receive presentation from the City’s demographer consulting firm, National
Demographics Corporation, Inc. on the draft maps prepared for consideration based
on prior direction; and
2. Open the public hearing and receive public comment and input regarding
“communities of interest” and the draft maps presented for consideration and close
the public hearing; and
3. Provide direction to staff and NDC regarding potential revisions to proposed maps
and for introduction of an Ordinance at the fourth public hearing scheduled on
February 2, 2022.
Attachment 1: 2020 Census Results applied to existing City Council Districts
Attachment 2: Current Adopted District Map 401(b)
Attachment 3: NDC “Green” Map
Attachment 4: NDC “Orange” Map
Attachment 5: NDC “Yellow” Map
8
District 1 2 3 4 Total
2020 2020 Census (Adjusted)9,139 9,066 8,203 9,918 36,326
Deviation from ideal 58 -16 -879 837 1,715
% Deviation 0.63% -0.17% -9.67% 9.21% 18.88%
% Hisp 28% 17% 17% 66% 33%
% NH White 55% 63% 67% 22% 51%
% NH Black 2% 3% 1% 2% 2%
% Asian-American 12% 14% 11% 7% 11%
Total 6,939 6,893 6,611 5,341 25,784
% Hisp 24% 11% 14% 55% 24%
% NH White 58% 72% 73% 35% 61%
% NH Black 1% 3% 3% 2% 2%
% Asian/Pac.Isl.14% 14% 9% 5% 11%
Total 5,990 6,845 6,233 4,377 23,445
% Latino est.22% 12% 13% 57% 23%
% Spanish-Surnamed 20% 11% 12% 52% 21%
% Asian-Surnamed 4% 6% 4% 3% 5%
% Filipino-Surnamed 1% 1% 1% 1% 1%
% NH White est.72% 79% 79% 39% 70%
% NH Black 2% 3% 3% 3% 3%
Total 3,840 4,454 4,494 2,132 14,920
% Latino est.18% 10% 11% 51% 18%
% Spanish-Surnamed 17% 9% 11% 48% 17%
% Asian-Surnamed 3% 5% 4% 3% 4%
% Filipino-Surnamed 1% 1% 1% 1% 1%
% NH White est.76% 81% 81% 43% 74%
% NH Black 2% 3% 3% 3% 2%
Total 5,288 6,171 5,635 3,493 20,587
% Latino est.21% 12% 12% 54% 21%
% Spanish-Surnamed 19% 11% 11% 49% 20%
% Asian-Surnamed 4% 6% 4% 3% 5%
% Filipino-Surnamed 1% 1% 1% 1% 1%
% NH White est.73% 79% 80% 41% 71%
% NH Black est.2% 3% 3% 3% 3%
ACS Pop. Est.Total 10,141 8,955 8,612 9,079 36,787
age0-19 29% 23% 24% 29% 27%
age20-60 53% 54% 52% 55% 54%
age60plus 18% 23% 24% 16% 20%
immigrants 17% 12% 11% 27% 17%
naturalized 73% 68% 77% 45% 61%
english 73% 83% 83% 51% 73%
spanish 18% 7% 8% 40% 18%
asian-lang 7% 5% 3% 4% 5%
other lang 2% 6% 5% 4% 4%
Language Fluency Speaks Eng. "Less
than Very Well"11% 5% 4% 19% 10%
hs-grad 41% 27% 32% 44% 36%
bachelor 26% 36% 34% 17% 28%
graduatedegree 14% 20% 18% 9% 15%
Child in Household child-under18 41% 32% 36% 40% 37%
Pct of Pop. Age 16+employed 66% 71% 71% 69% 69%
income 0-25k 5% 4% 5% 12% 6%
income 25-50k 8% 8% 8% 20% 11%
income 50-75k 18% 9% 8% 19% 13%
income 75-200k 52% 48% 52% 40% 48%
income 200k-plus 17% 31% 27% 8% 21%
single family 98% 98% 100% 56% 88%
multi-family 2% 2% 0% 44% 12%
rented 16% 15% 11% 56% 24%
owned 84% 85% 89% 44% 76%
Total population data from the California adjustment to the 2020 Decennial Census. Surname-based Voter Registration and Turnout
data from the California Statewide Database. Latino voter registration and turnout data are Spanish-surname counts adjusted using
Census Population Department undercount estimates. NH White and NH Black registration and turnout counts estimated by NDC.
Citizen Voting Age Pop., Age, Immigration, and other demographics from the 2015-2019 American Community Survey and Special
Tabulation 5-year data.
Housing Stats
Household Income
Education (among those
age 25+)
2020 Total Pop
City of Moorpark - Current Districts - 2020 Census Adjusted
Language spoken at home
Immigration
Citizen Voting Age Pop
Age
Voter Registration (Nov
2020)
Voter Turnout (Nov
2018)
Voter Turnout (Nov
2020)
ATTACHMENT 1
9
ATTACHMENT 2
10
ATTACHMENT 3
11
District 1 2 3 4 Total
2020 2020 Census (Adjusted)9,139 7,745 9,524 9,918 36,326
Deviation from ideal 58 -1,337 443 837 2,173
% Deviation 0.63% -14.72% 4.87% 9.21% 23.93%
% Hisp 28% 16% 17% 66% 33%
% NH White 55% 62% 67% 22% 51%
% NH Black 2% 3% 1% 2% 2%
% Asian-American 12% 15% 11% 7% 11%
Total 6,939 5,915 7,588 5,341 25,784
% Hisp 24% 10% 14% 55% 24%
% NH White 58% 71% 73% 35% 61%
% NH Black 1% 3% 3% 2% 2%
% Asian/Pac.Isl.14% 16% 9% 5% 11%
Total 5,990 6,693 6,385 4,377 23,445
% Latino est.22% 12% 13% 57% 23%
% Spanish-Surnamed 20% 11% 12% 52% 21%
% Asian-Surnamed 4% 6% 5% 3% 5%
% Filipino-Surnamed 1% 1% 1% 1% 1%
% NH White est.72% 79% 79% 39% 70%
% NH Black 2% 3% 3% 3% 3%0 0 0 0 0Total5,288 6,034 5,772 3,493 20,587
% Latino est.21% 12% 12% 54% 21%
% Spanish-Surnamed 19% 11% 11% 49% 20%
% Asian-Surnamed 4% 6% 5% 3% 5%
% Filipino-Surnamed 1% 1% 1% 1% 1%
% NH White est.73% 79% 80% 41% 71%
% NH Black est.2% 3% 3% 3% 3%
ACS Pop. Est.Total 10,141 7,595 9,972 9,079 36,787
age0-19 29% 23% 24% 29% 27%
age20-60 53% 54% 52% 55% 54%
age60plus 18% 22% 24% 16% 20%
immigrants 17% 12% 10% 27% 17%
naturalized 73% 69% 75% 45% 61%
english 73% 81% 84% 51% 73%
spanish 18% 7% 8% 40% 18%
asian-lang 7% 5% 3% 4% 5%
other lang 2% 6% 5% 4% 4%
Language Fluency Speaks Eng. "Less
than Very Well"11% 6% 4% 19% 10%
hs-grad 41% 26% 32% 44% 36%
bachelor 26% 36% 34% 17% 28%
graduatedegree 14% 21% 18% 9% 15%
Child in Household child-under18 41% 32% 36% 40% 37%
Pct of Pop. Age 16+ employed 66% 71% 71% 69% 69%
income 0-25k 5% 4% 5% 12% 6%
income 25-50k 8% 9% 7% 20% 11%
income 50-75k 18% 9% 8% 19% 13%
income 75-200k 52% 47% 52% 40% 48%
income 200k-plus 17% 31% 28% 8% 21%
single family 98% 98% 100% 56% 88%
multi-family 2% 2% 0% 44% 12%
rented 16% 16% 11% 56% 24%
owned 84% 84% 89% 44% 76%
Total population data from the California adjustment to the 2020 Decennial Census. Surname-based Voter Registration and Turnout
data from the California Statewide Database. Latino voter registration and turnout data are Spanish-surname counts adjusted using
Census Population Department undercount estimates. NH White and NH Black registration and turnout counts estimated by NDC.
Citizen Voting Age Pop., Age, Immigration, and other demographics from the 2015-2019 American Community Survey and Special
Tabulation 5-year data.
Housing Stats
Household Income
Education (among those
age 25+)
2020 Total Pop
City of Moorpark - NDC Green Map - 2020 Census Adjusted
Language spoken at home
Immigration
Citizen Voting Age Pop
Age
Voter Registration (Nov
2020)
Voter Turnout (Nov
2020)
12
ATTACHMENT 4
13
District 1 2 3 4 Total
2020 2020 Census (Adjusted)9,139 9,066 9,116 9,005 36,326
Deviation from ideal 58 -16 35 -77 134
% Deviation 0.63% -0.17% 0.38% -0.84% 1.48%
% Hisp 28% 17% 20% 68% 33%
% NH White 55% 63% 64% 21% 51%
% NH Black 2% 3% 2% 2% 2%
% Asian-American 12% 14% 11% 7% 11%
Total 6,939 6,893 7,174 4,777 25,784
% Hisp 24% 11% 16% 57% 24%
% NH White 58% 72% 71% 33% 61%
% NH Black 1% 3% 3% 1% 2%
% Asian/Pac.Isl.14% 14% 9% 5% 11%
Total 5,990 6,845 6,634 3,976 23,445
% Latino est.22% 12% 14% 59% 23%
% Spanish-Surnamed 20% 11% 13% 54% 21%
% Asian-Surnamed 4% 6% 5% 2% 5%
% Filipino-Surnamed 1% 1% 1% 1% 1%
% NH White est.72% 79% 78% 37% 70%
% NH Black 2% 3% 3% 2% 3%0 0 0 0 0Total5,288 6,171 5,977 3,151 20,587
% Latino est.21% 12% 13% 56% 21%
% Spanish-Surnamed 19% 11% 12% 52% 20%
% Asian-Surnamed 4% 6% 5% 2% 5%
% Filipino-Surnamed 1% 1% 1% 1% 1%
% NH White est.73% 79% 79% 39% 71%
% NH Black est.2% 3% 3% 3% 3%
ACS Pop. Est.Total 10,141 8,955 9,501 8,190 36,787
age0-19 29% 23% 25% 29% 27%
age20-60 53% 54% 52% 55% 54%
age60plus 18% 23% 23% 16% 20%
immigrants 17% 12% 12% 28% 17%
naturalized 73% 68% 73% 44% 61%
english 73% 83% 82% 49% 73%
spanish 18% 7% 10% 42% 18%
asian-lang 7% 5% 3% 4% 5%
other lang 2% 6% 5% 4% 4%
Language Fluency Speaks Eng. "Less
than Very Well"11% 5% 4% 21% 10%
hs-grad 41% 27% 34% 44% 36%
bachelor 26% 36% 33% 17% 28%
graduatedegree 14% 20% 17% 9% 15%
Child in Household child-under18 41% 32% 36% 41% 37%
Pct of Pop. Age 16+ employed 66% 71% 70% 69% 69%
income 0-25k 5% 4% 6% 12% 6%
income 25-50k 8% 8% 9% 19% 11%
income 50-75k 18% 9% 9% 19% 13%
income 75-200k 52% 48% 50% 41% 48%
income 200k-plus 17% 31% 25% 9% 21%
single family 98% 98% 92% 60% 88%
multi-family 2% 2% 8% 40% 12%
rented 16% 15% 17% 53% 24%
owned 84% 85% 83% 47% 76%
Total population data from the California adjustment to the 2020 Decennial Census. Surname-based Voter Registration and Turnout
data from the California Statewide Database. Latino voter registration and turnout data are Spanish-surname counts adjusted using
Census Population Department undercount estimates. NH White and NH Black registration and turnout counts estimated by NDC.
Citizen Voting Age Pop., Age, Immigration, and other demographics from the 2015-2019 American Community Survey and Special
Tabulation 5-year data.
Housing Stats
Household Income
Education (among those
age 25+)
2020 Total Pop
City of Moorpark - NDC Orange Map - 2020 Census Adjusted
Language spoken at home
Immigration
Citizen Voting Age Pop
Age
Voter Registration (Nov
2020)
Voter Turnout (Nov
2020)
14
ATTACHMENT 5
15
District 1 2 3 4 Total
2020 2020 Census (Adjusted)9,139 8,911 9,064 9,212 36,326
Deviation from ideal 58 -171 -18 131 301
% Deviation 0.63% -1.88% -0.19% 1.44% 3.31%
% Hisp 28% 18% 17% 68% 33%
% NH White 55% 61% 67% 20% 51%
% NH Black 2% 3% 1% 2% 2%
% Asian-American 12% 14% 11% 7% 11%
Total 6,939 6,677 7,265 4,902 25,784
% Hisp 24% 12% 14% 57% 24%
% NH White 58% 70% 73% 34% 61%
% NH Black 1% 3% 3% 2% 2%
% Asian/Pac.Isl.14% 15% 9% 4% 11%
Total 5,990 7,163 6,331 3,961 23,445
% Latino est.22% 13% 13% 59% 23%
% Spanish-Surnamed 20% 12% 12% 54% 21%
% Asian-Surnamed 4% 6% 5% 3% 5%
% Filipino-Surnamed 1% 1% 1% 1% 1%
% NH White est.72% 78% 79% 36% 70%
% NH Black 2% 3% 3% 3% 3%0 0 0 0 0Total5,288 6,434 5,724 3,141 20,587
% Latino est.21% 13% 12% 56% 21%
% Spanish-Surnamed 19% 12% 11% 52% 20%
% Asian-Surnamed 4% 6% 5% 3% 5%
% Filipino-Surnamed 1% 1% 1% 1% 1%
% NH White est.73% 79% 80% 38% 71%
% NH Black est.2% 3% 3% 3% 3%
ACS Pop. Est.Total 10,141 8,762 9,498 8,386 36,787
age0-19 29% 23% 24% 29% 27%
age20-60 53% 54% 52% 55% 54%
age60plus 18% 23% 24% 16% 20%
immigrants 17% 13% 11% 28% 17%
naturalized 73% 67% 76% 44% 61%
english 73% 81% 84% 50% 73%
spanish 18% 8% 8% 42% 18%
asian-lang 7% 5% 3% 4% 5%
other lang 2% 6% 5% 4% 4%
Language Fluency Speaks Eng. "Less
than Very Well"11% 6% 4% 20% 10%
hs-grad 41% 27% 32% 45% 36%
bachelor 26% 36% 34% 15% 28%
graduatedegree 14% 20% 18% 9% 15%
Child in Household child-under18 41% 32% 36% 41% 37%
Pct of Pop. Age 16+ employed 66% 70% 71% 69% 69%
income 0-25k 5% 4% 5% 13% 6%
income 25-50k 8% 9% 7% 21% 11%
income 50-75k 18% 9% 8% 19% 13%
income 75-200k 52% 48% 52% 38% 48%
income 200k-plus 17% 29% 28% 8% 21%
single family 98% 98% 100% 53% 88%
multi-family 2% 2% 0% 47% 12%
rented 16% 16% 11% 59% 24%
owned 84% 84% 89% 41% 76%
Total population data from the California adjustment to the 2020 Decennial Census. Surname-based Voter Registration and Turnout
data from the California Statewide Database. Latino voter registration and turnout data are Spanish-surname counts adjusted using
Census Population Department undercount estimates. NH White and NH Black registration and turnout counts estimated by NDC.
Citizen Voting Age Pop., Age, Immigration, and other demographics from the 2015-2019 American Community Survey and Special
Tabulation 5-year data.
Housing Stats
Household Income
Education (among those
age 25+)
2020 Total Pop
City of Moorpark - NDC Yellow Map - 2020 Census Adjusted
Language spoken at home
Immigration
Citizen Voting Age Pop
Age
Voter Registration (Nov
2020)
Voter Turnout (Nov
2020)
16