HomeMy WebLinkAboutAGENDA REPORT 2022 0601 CCSA REG ITEM 09ACITY OF MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA
City Council Meeting
of June 1, 2022
ACTION CONSENSUS TO RECOMMEND
THE AGRARIAN STYLE AND MOVE
FORWARD WITH DESIGN
DEVELOPMENT DRAWINGS. (ROLL
CALL VOTE: UNANIMOUS)
BY A. Hurtado.
A. Consider Design of New Moorpark City Library. Staff Recommendation: Provide
direction to staff on preferred Architectural style, and direct staff to move forward
with Design Development Drawings. (Staff: Jeremy Laurentowski, Parks and
Recreation Director)
Item: 9.A.
Item: 9.A.
MOORPARK CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA REPORT
TO: Honorable City Council
FROM: Jeremy Laurentowski, Parks and Recreation Director
BY: Jessica Sandifer, Community Services Manager
DATE: 06/01/2022 Regular Meeting
SUBJECT: Consider Design of New Moorpark City Library
BACKGROUND & DISCUSSION
A new city hall and library have been a top City Council priority for many years. The
project planning for the Civic Center began in 2005 and initially only included a new city
hall building. The library was added in 2007 when the City of Moorpark took over
operations of the library from the County of Ventura.
In 2007 a conceptual master plan was approved that included a 35,000 sq. ft. city hall
and 25,000 sq. ft. library, both two-story buildings. After the approval of the master plan
the city conducted a voter opinion survey to determine whether a ballot measure to raise
funding for the library building would be supported. The survey indicated that such a
measure would not be supported, and lacking sufficient funding for both buildings, the
project stalled.
By 2016, the city library had become so popular that library patrons and staff were
beginning to feel the pinch of the small library space. Since funds existed to construct
one building, it was determined that the library’s popularity warranted a switch in priority
to construction of a new library, rather than city hall. The focus was to create a library
space that would meet the needs of the community. It was determined that an 18,000
sq. ft. single story library would achieve these goals.
In 2018, the City hired Linda Demmers, Library Consultant, to assist with design and
planning of the new library space and selected architect CWA AIA, Inc. for the project.
Also, in 2018, the City Council requested that a Civic Center Master Plan (Master Plan)
of the civic center site be prepared, to ensure that the library is placed at the most
advantageous location, while leaving room for a future city hall and highlighting
opportunities for private investment and economic development along High Street.
133
Honorable City Council
06/01/2022 Regular Meeting
Page 2
The Master Plan involves construction of the library building on the north side of High
Street west of Moorpark Avenue, generally across from the Post Office parking lot. The
city hall building would be constructed where the existing library is currently located. The
Master Plan accommodates an 18,000 sq. ft. library building, a 22,000 sq. ft. City Hall
building with City Council chambers, associated parking for both facilities, as well as
enhanced parking for public use, and proposes to repurpose the Post Office parking lot
into a central gathering place (“mercado”) to be used for various events, such as a
farmers’ market. It also provides for additional economic activation of High Street to the
west and potential for future redevelopment of the existing Civic Center site. The Master
Plan considers a phased approach, with the new library constructed first and the city hall
and mercado to follow at a future date. This phased approach will allow staff to evaluate
funding options to build out the Civic Center campus. The Master Plan was adopted by
the City Council in September 2020.
In March 2021, staff presented to the City Council several options related to the
architectural style for the new library, as well as a space planning concept related to the
library operations and general layout of program areas. The City Council approved the
space planning concept, however, there was concern regarding the design direction
proposed by the project architect. In general, the City Council did not feel that the library
design concepts embraced the history and culture of Moorpark, nor did they feel that they
complemented the existing architectural styles on High Street.
Shortly after the Special City Council meeting, it became evident that a change needed
to be made in order to move the library project forward. In July 2021, Staff determined
that the agreement with the prior architect should be terminated, and in December 2021,
after a Request for Qualification/Proposal (RFP) and selection process, the City Council
awarded an agreement to LPA, Inc. (LPA) to continue the design efforts for the new
library. LPA stood out during the selection process due to their extensive experience in
library design, particularly their experience related to libraries with historical significance
and libraries located within historically significant locations. LPA’s vision for the new
library was comprehensive, well thought out, and creative, and was based on Moorpark’s
agricultural history, culture, and celebrated the old town character of High Street.
DISCUSSION
The RFP for architectural services included the development of two fully rendered
architectural styles that would be presented to the City Council. The RFP described a
building that looks like it has always been a part of High Street, with a timeless inviting
design that adheres to old town values, while still maintaining a spacious interior with use
of natural light, modern functions, and innovative amenities. Additionally, the architectural
styles should embrace Moorpark’s agricultural history, culture, and celebrate the old town
character of High Street.
134
Honorable City Council
06/01/2022 Regular Meeting
Page 3
Since December 2021, LPA has been working on the creation of the two exterior design
schemes for the library. Through their research, and in looking at the current and future
architectural styles along High Street, LPA has come up with two architectural styles for
the City Council’s consideration.
• Agrarian Architecture: This building style tends to focus on incorporating local
materials into buildings with agricultural elements that are often rustic, organic, and
comfortable. This style was meant to pay homage to the agricultural past of
Moorpark, which began largely as a farming community in the late 1800’s. The
building design is based on the utilitarian structure of a barn that has been
repurposed into a library, with use of accordion windows to allow programming to
spill outside onto the exterior porches. The interior of the facility will feature similar
barn style architectural elements with wood beams, and natural light, while still
being an efficient modern building.
• Industrial Architecture: Industrial buildings are characterized by wide-open
spaces, a minimalist aesthetic, exposed materials and utilities, and an efficient use
of natural light. This style is intended to be a nod towards the growth of Moorpark
away from a farming community towards a modern industrial community with
manufacturing and retail at its economic core. The brick style mirrors some of the
brick elements seen in earlier High Street architecture, with some updated
elements, such as metal awnings, tall deep-set windows, and accordion doors to
allow programming to spill out on to the wraparound porches. The interior of the
facility will feature industrial style elements, like open ceilings with exposed
ductwork and brickwork throughout.
On May 16, 2022, the City hosted an in-person Community Workshop in order to gather
input on the two library designs. However, it was not clear on which style was preferred,
as four of the attendees preferred the Agrarian style, and three preferred the Industrial
style. Since participation was relatively low, staff posted the two options online along with
a survey to obtain more information from Moorpark’s residents. As of May 23, 2022,
50 individuals have completed the survey. Thirty-four have stated a preference for the
Agrarian style, two prefer the Industrial style, eleven stated that either option would be
appropriate, and three stated that neither option was appropriate. The survey is open to
the public for comments through May 30, 2022. Staff will update the City Council on the
final survey results during the City Council meeting on June 1, 2022.
Staff believes that both styles are appropriate for High Street. Both complement the
existing and future architecture styles along the High Street corridor, both styles consider
Moorpark’s history, and both portray a prominence expected of a government building.
Although the public has generally expressed a preference for the Agrarian style, staff
prefers the Industrial style from an operational and cost perspective.
135
Honorable City Council
06/01/2022 Regular Meeting
Page 4
• The Agrarian style is more costly to build when comparing the building design to
the Industrial option. Staff was not able to obtain actual cost estimates at this time,
however, the architect has stated that overall, the Agrarian option will be more
costly to build. This is due to the vaulted framework, overall increase in building
materials, and complexity of construction.
• The Industrial style is more cost-effective to maintain. The Industrial building will
be constructed with reinforced concrete walls clad with brick on both the exterior
elevations and interior walls where appropriate. There are minimal maintenance
costs associated with this type of construction. However, the use of hardwood or
other natural materials are proposed for the Agrarian option. Wood is costly to
maintain and will require regular maintenance. There are certain composite
materials that have a texture similar to wood, however, these materials may not
convey the same feel as natural wood and may take away from the Agrarian style.
Additionally, the tall windows will be costly to clean, and the vaulted ceilings will
complicate regular maintenance operations. In an effort to mitigate some of the
maintenance concerns related to wood, the architect has introduced stone on the
exterior of the Agrarian building, particularly on the south/west side of the building
where the sun exposure is the most damaging.
• The Industrial style is more sustainable. The flat roof on the Industrial style
compliments flat interior ceilings, which will allow for better energy efficiency and
better temperature regulation throughout the building. Additionally, staff is
exploring the opportunity to install rooftop solar panels. The flat roof of the
Industrial style will allow for a full array of solar panels across all 18,000 square
feet of rooftop, while the Agrarian style will be limited to solar arrays only on the
south facing gable roof sections.
Although there are certain cost implications related to the Agrarian style, staff feels
comfortable supporting this option and recommends that the City Council consider this
style as the preferred option. Should this option be selected, staff will continue to work
with the architect to find creative ways to mitigate these concerns.
Staff anticipates that the library project will take approximately two and a half years to
complete and as discussed during prior staff reports, will cost the city approximately
$22,000,000 to build. LPA has confirmed that this is a realistic time frame and budget.
However, it should be noted that construction and labor costs have been extremely
unstable over the last several years due to the pandemic and resulting material shortages,
and there has been quite a bit of uncertainty and speculation regarding the actual costs
of construction once this project goes out to bid. Staff will return to the City Council once
a detailed budget has been prepared.
136
Honorable City Council
06/01/2022 Regular Meeting
Page 5
FISCAL IMPACT
There is no incremental fiscal impact of this action, as the design of the library is already
budgeted in the Fiscal Year 2021/22 budget.
COUNCIL GOAL COMPLIANCE
This action is consistent with City Council Strategy 3, Objective 3.11: “Complete
construction plans for the City’s new Library.”
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Provide direction to staff on preferred Architectural style, and direct staff to move forward
with Design Development Drawings.
Attachment 1: Agrarian Architecture
Attachment 2: Industrial Architecture
137
ment 1
ATTACHMENT 1
138
139
140
141
ATTACHMENT 2
142
143
144
145