HomeMy WebLinkAboutAGENDA REPORT 2022 0720 CCSA REG ITEM 10DCITY OF MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA
City Council Meeting
of July 20, 2022
ACTION APPROVED STAFF
RECOMMENDATION.
BY A. Hurtado.
D. Consider Adoption of a “Support” Position for Behavioral Health Legislative Reform
Introduced by California State Senator Susan Eggman (SB 929, SB 965, SB 970,
SB 1035, SB 1154, SB 1227, SB 1238, and SB 1416). Staff Recommendation:
Adopt a “Support” position for the above-listed bills and authorize the Mayor and
staff to prepare and submit support letters for them. (Staff: Brian Chong,
Assistant to the City Manager)
Item: 10.D.
MOORPARK CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA REPORT
TO: Honorable City Council
FROM: Brian Chong, Assistant to the City Manager
DATE: 07/20/2022 Regular Meeting
SUBJECT: Consider Adoption of a “Support” Position for Behavioral Health
Legislative Reform Introduced by California State Senator Susan
Eggman (SB 929, SB 965, SB 970, SB 1035, SB 1154, SB 1227,
SB 1238, and SB 1416)
BACKGROUND
In April 2022, California State Senator Susan Eggman, the Big City Mayors c oalition,
the California State Association of Psychiatrists, and the Psychiatrist Physicians’
Alliance of California introduced legislation to overhaul California’s behavioral health
care system. Increasingly, mental health problems among the American population are
becoming more prevalent, a problem likely accelerated by the COVID-19 pandemic.
The League of California Cities is encouraging cities across California to support this
legislation as it proceeds through the California Legislature. Because t he City has not
historically provided behavioral health services directly – the County of Ventura provides
these services for Moorpark residents – the City Council’s Legislative Platform does not
authorize the Mayor or staff to take legislative positions on issues of mental and
behavioral health without prior approval of the City Council. As such, this agenda item
is being brought before the City Council, with a recommendation to formally adopt a
“Support” position authorize the Mayor to sign letters of support for these bills.
DISCUSSION
Senator Eggman, who is a clinical social worker, has introduced eight bills to modernize
the way in which California provides behavioral health services. Generally, these bills
would expand prevention and early intervention efforts, support community services,
improve intersystem collaboration, expand access to assisted outpatient treatment,
increase accountability through outcome tracking, prevent avoidable conservatorships,
and improve the effectiveness of existing conservatorship processes for those that need
Item: 10.D.
666
Honorable City Council
07/20/2022 Regular Meeting
Page 2
them. The text of each bill and analyses of each by the Legislative Analyst’s Office are
available at https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/. However, the bills generally:
SB 929: Community Mental Health Services: Data Collection
Due to the fragmented nature of California’s mental health system, many different
entities are involved in the identification, investigation, treatment, and follow-up when it
comes to those experiencing serious mental illness, grave disability, or dangerousness
to self or others. SB 929 would require the California Department of Health Care
Services to collect additional data about the individuals subject to mental health holds,
including the numbers and types of holds, services provided, waiting periods, and
outcomes, with the intended effect of improving communications, reducing redundant
efforts, and avoiding missed treatments.
SB 965: Conservatorships: Medical Record: Hearsay Rule
When a person is “gravely disabled” (unable to provide for basic needs of food, clothing,
or shelter due to a mental health disorder) or deemed a danger to themselves or others,
a court can place that person under a temporary conservatorship. This bill would
modify hearsay exemptions and result in more medical information being provided to
courts as they make their determinations on conservatorships.
SB 970: Mental Health Services
This bill would establish the California Mental Health Services Act Outcomes and
Accountability Review to assist evaluation of mental health programs. The bill would
change the focus of spending from being based on types of programs to be funded to
being based on achievable outcomes. The effect would be to better identify effective
and ineffective programs.
SB 1035: Mental Health Services: Assisted Outpatient Treatment
Medication adherence is an essential tool in treating mental health disorders and can
allow many individuals to stay safely in their communities. According to a State Auditor
Report, medication non-compliance is the prevailing factor why individuals cycle back
into restrictive settings. SB 1035 would allow courts to conduct status hearings with a
person subject to an assisted outpatient treatment order to evaluate progress and
medication adherence when determining whether a person still meets the criteri a for
assisted outpatient treatment.
SB 1154: Facilities for Mental Health or Substance Use Disorder Crisis: Database
This bill would establish a real-time, Internet-based dashboard to collect, aggregate,
and display information about beds in inpatient psychiatric facilities, crisis stabilization
units, residential community mental health facilities, and licensed residential alcoholism
or drug abuse recovery or treatment facilities. Access to an up -to-date database of
available beds would help providers quickly find and secure treatment for clients in
appropriate settings, thereby reducing delays and reducing extended stays in
emergency rooms.
667
Honorable City Council
07/20/2022 Regular Meeting
Page 3
SB 1227: Involuntary Commitment: Intensive Treatment
For individuals who are gravely disabled or a danger to self or others, counties can
currently establish a 14-day period of intensive treatment, with an additional period of
30 days as an alternative to seeking a conservatorship. Ideally, a person will stabilize
during these periods. In situations where the person does not stabilize as hoped, this
bill would allow one additional 30-day period before a conservatorship is sought.
SB 1238: Behavioral Health Services: Existing and Projected Needs
This bill would require the California Department of Health Care Services to review
current and projected behavioral health care infrastructure and service needs in each
region of the state, in conjunction with regional governments across the state.
SB 1416: Mental Health Services: Gravely Disabled Persons
This bill would modernize the definition of “gravely disabled” to more accurately provide
for the needs faced by individuals experiencing severe mental illness. Specifically, it
would create additional core criteria such that a person experiencing serious mental
illness should have the capacity to provide for their own personal or medical care, and
their own self-protection and safety, when a court considers whether a conservatorship
or other involuntary intervention is appropriate.
Current Status of Legislation
All eight bills have been passed by the State Senate and are currently proceeding
through the State Assembly’s reviews. Between July 1 and August 1, the Legislature is
in its summer recess. In August, these bills will be further considered by various
Assembly Committees before going to a floor vote in the Assembly and a concurrence
vote in the Senate. If the bills pass those votes, they will be sent to Governor Newsom
for signature or veto no later than August 31. He will have until September 30 to sign or
veto bills.
Legislative Platform
Earlier this year, the City Council approved the City’s February 2022 Legislative
Platform, which authorizes the Mayor and City staff to take formal positions on
legislative matters within specified categories without explicit City Council approval.
Such action is often warranted because legislation can be quickly introduced and
passed in between City Council meeting dates, which would preclude the City from
providing feedback to legislators. The City’s Legislative Platform includes a list of
Community Services issues where the Mayor and staff are authorized to take positions
without explicit City Council direction, but those items listed are generally limited to
community services that the City provides (solid waste services, animal services, and
library services). Because the City has not historically provided mental and be havioral
health services, though, they are not included in the City’s Legislative Platform.
However, the League of California Cities is encouraging cities to support these bills.
Additionally, staff from the Ventura County Sheriff’s Office Crisis Intervention Team has
informally reviewed the bills and expressed support. As such, it is recommended that
668
Honorable City Council
07/20/2022 Regular Meeting
Page 4
the City Council authorize the Mayor and staff to officially support these bills through
California’s legislative process.
FISCAL IMPACT
None.
COUNCIL GOAL COMPLIANCE
This action does not support a current strategic directive.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Adopt a “Support” position for the above-listed bills and authorize the Mayor and staff to
prepare and submit support letters for them.
669