HomeMy WebLinkAboutAGENDA REPORT 2022 1102 CCSA REG ITEM 09BCITY OF MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA
City Council Meeting
of November 2, 2022
ACTION RECEIVED AND FILED REPORT.
BY A. Hurtado.
B. Consider Moorpark Watershed Parks Recreation and Conservation Authority Trail
Connection Feasibility Study. Staff Recommendation: Receive and file report.
(Staff: Jeremy Laurentowski, Parks & Recreation Director)
Item: 9.B.
MOORPARK CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA REPORT
TO: Honorable City Council
FROM: Jeremy Laurentowski, Parks and Recreation Director
DATE: 11/02/2022 Regular Meeting
SUBJECT: Consider Moorpark Watershed Parks Recreation and Conservation
Authority Trail Connection Feasibility Study
BACKGROUND
The Moorpark Watershed Parks Recreation and Conservation Authority (MWPRCA) is a
joint powers agency (JPA) formed between the City of Moorpark and the Santa Monica
Mountains Conservancy to manage open space properties that the City purchases
outside of Moorpark City limits. Currently the MWPRCA owns and manages the 80-acre
open space parcel in the Tierra Rejada Valley, south of Tierra Rejada Road and west of
Moorpark Road. Opening the 80-acre open space for recreational use has long been a
goal of the City Council.
In March 2020, the MWPRCA applied for a planning and design grant from the Santa
Monica Mountains Conservancy to prepare a trail alignment and feasibility study to
determine whether an approximately one (1) mile trail connection between the 80-acre
Property on Moorpark Road and the property owned by Conejo Recreation and Park
District (CRPD) was feasible. The trail connection would ultimately connect to Conejo
Open Space Conservation Agency (COSCA) property in Thousand Oaks, providing an
opportunity for Moorpark residents to utilize the expansive COSCA and CRPD trail
network. The grant application was for the services of a civil engineer to determine the
feasibility and alignment for the trail connection to the CRPD property in the City of
Thousand Oaks, through the Santa Rosa Valley. Staff was notified in June 2020 that the
MWPRCA had received the grant. In December 2020, the MWPRCA hired Phoenix Civil
Engineering (Phoenix) to prepare the Feasibility Study. The City of Moorpark contributed
to the project by donating the required match funding for the grant.
Item: 9.B.
277
Honorable City Council
11/02/2022 Regular Meeting
Page 2
DISCUSSION
The Feasibility Study has been finalized and was presented to the MWPRCA board on
May 12, 2022. Generally, the feasibility study indicates that a trail connection between
MWPRCA open space and CRPD is feasible from a constructability perspective. The
MWPRCA Board ultimately approved the Preferred Trail Alignment, but expressed
concerns related to the exceptionally high-cost implications.
The attached study identifies two potential trail alignments:
Preferred Trail Alignment: The Preferred Trail Alignment starts at the existing gated
entrance off Moorpark Road, crosses the drainage channel, requiring the installation of a
bridge, and continues south to the southern end of the property. The trail alignment
transitions to the back of curb along the landscaped frontage of the Lexington Hills
Homeowner’s Association (Lexington HOA) property entrance. It should be noted that
the trail transitions through two privately owned parcels within the Lexington Hills
community and that easements, or outright property acquisition, would be required to
transition along the Lexington Hills frontage. The trail crosses the Lexington HOA
entrance/exit on Moorpark Road, continues south, and transitions up the side of the slope
to an existing unimproved access road located on the hillside that is utilized by Southern
California Edison (SCE) for maintenance operations. The existing access road
terminates at the northwest corner of the intersection of Moorpark Road and Santa Rosa
Road. Trail users would utilize the existing crosswalks at the intersection located on the
north and east sides of the intersection. Pedestrian/equestrian push buttons are already
installed on the traffic signal poles. Once across the intersection, trail users would
continue east along Moorpark Road on a trail separated from the paved vehicle travel
way to the terminus of the CRPD parcel.
Alternate Trail Alignment: The Alternate Trail Alignment starts at the same location as
Option A, but rather than traversing in front of the Lexington Hills community, the trail
crosses Moorpark Road at the Read Road intersection, and ultimately transitions along
the east side of Moorpark Road to the intersection of Santa Rosa Road. The trail
terminates similar to the Preferred Trail Alignment and utilizes the existing cross walk at
the Moorpark Road/Santa Rosa Road intersection. This option is not preferred because
crossing Moorpark Road at Read Road presents significant safety issues for pedestrians
due to the mid-block crossing and blind corners on either side of Read Road. This option
would require the construction of a signalized intersection, which was not supported by
the County of Ventura. Additionally, this option would require the construction of large
retaining walls in order to facilitate the appropriate trail width on the east side of Moorpark
Road. The slope along this section of road exceeds 2:1 and it is estimated that the
retaining walls would need to be approximately 20’ in height to accommodate the trail.
278
Honorable City Council
11/02/2022 Regular Meeting
Page 3
The project is complicated and has a number of challenges which are outlined in the
feasibility study. However, staff feels that the largest challenges are:
• Acquisition of easements from private property owners
• Project funding
• Future on-going maintenance costs
Easement Acquisition: As mentioned, access easements would be required from two
Lexington Hills homeowners in order to facilitate the Preferred Trail Alignment in front of
the Lexington Hills community. Staff attended several meetings with the Lexington Hills
Homeowner’s Association (Lexington HOA. Both of the affected homeowners attended
the meeting. Although the Lexington HOA generally supported the project, the
homeowners whose properties were directly affected, expressed concerns regarding
safety for both trail users and vehicles entering the Lexington Hills community, as well as
concerns related to security and privacy. There were also concerns regarding the use of
private property needed for the trail alignment. The easement required from one of the
property owners is completely outside their property line wall. However, the easement
on the second property would require modifications to the property line wall of that
homeowner. Mitigation for this would need to be included at the time the easement is
acquired.
Project Funding / Staffing: The cost to construct the Preferred Trail Alignment is
approximately $3.8m to $4.8m at today’s costs, not including the costs of the two required
easements. Beyond applying for grants, the MWPRCA does not have a funding
mechanism to support the project. Most grant applications also require demonstration of
property control, and/or shovel readiness. Shovel readiness would require completion of
design and construction drawings, which would require additional funding to complete the
plans prior to submitting a grant application. Additionally, most grants require some
degree of match funding, which may be difficult to raise, unless the members of the JPA
contributed to the project.
Staffing of the MWPRCA is minimal and generally provided by the City of Moorpark as a
JPA member. The scope of this project would require significantly more staff time to
manage than is currently available. Staff estimates that the trail project would need to be
constructed in phases and will take approximately 10 to 15 years to complete in its
entirety. This is due to the complexity of the project and the number of agencies affected
by the trail, as well as the extensive studies that would need to be completed.
On-Going Maintenance: Although not addressed in the feasibility study, the MWPRCA
does not have an on-going funding source to support a project of this scale. Generally,
the City contributes a small amount of funding each year in the Fiscal Year Operating
Budget to maintain the 80-acre parcel, which typically provides for seasonal weed
abatement and trash removal. A funding source would need to be identified in order to
keep the trail open for public use.
279
Honorable City Council
11/02/2022 Regular Meeting
Page 4
MWPRCA staff identified the following steps that would be required to move the project
forward over the next several years:
1. Easement Acquisition (12 to 18 months): The acquisition of the two easements
required for this project are the key components to move the trail project forward.
Without these easements secured, this project will not be feasible. Meetings with
the property owners will need to be conducted to determine if purchasing an
easement is feasible.
2. Trail Master Plan: A Trail Master Plan highlighting the trail connectivity starting in
the City of Moorpark, through the property owned by CRPD and ultimately
connecting to an existing trail system managed by COSCA will be necessary to
apply for future grant opportunities. The trail alignment ultimately crosses several
jurisdictional boundaries and supports the goal of trail connectivity by several
agencies. Because of this, the project may be competitive and supported by state
and federal grant opportunities. Funding is not currently available to support a
Trail Master Plan.
3. Design Plans: Complete Design Plans will be necessary to apply for grant funding
related to the construction of the trail project. Shovel readiness is typically a
requirement of most grant applications. The high costs of this project will require
a phased construction approach. The first phase would include opening the project
to the public and construction of an interior trail system on the 80-acre property.
The second phase would include the trail construction from the 80-acre property
to the corner of Santa Rosa Road and Moorpark Road. At that intersection, the
project aligns with the trail system identified in the Santa Rosa Valley Trails Master
Plan. The final phase would include the trail section from the Santa Rosa Road
intersection to the property owned by CRPD.
Although staff believes that the future trail alignment would be a valuable asset to the trail
systems in the City of Moorpark, the Santa Rosa Valley, and the Conejo Valley, the project
challenges and high-cost implications would require a significant investment by the City,
from both a financial and staffing perspective. The Feasibility Study provides the
framework for a future comprehensive Master Plan and ultimately the completion of
Design Plans that can be developed and utilized for future grant opportunities. The City
Council may wish to consider moving this project forward as part of a future Strategies,
Goals and Objective process.
FISCAL IMPACT
There is no fiscal impact from this action.
280
Honorable City Council
11/02/2022 Regular Meeting
Page 5
COUNCIL GOAL COMPLIANCE
Strategy 6, Goal 1, Objective 2 (6.1.2): “Develop options for use of 80-acre City owned
open space parcel in the Tierra Rejada Valley for consideration by the City Council by
June 30, 2020.”
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Receive and file Report.
Attachment: MWPRCA Trail Feasibility Study
281
MAY 2022
Moorpark, Watershed, Parks, Recreation,
and Conservation Authority
TRAIL CONNECTION
FEASIBILITY STUDY
ATTACHMENT
282
MWPRCA Feasibility Study
Pedestrian Trail Grant Project Page 1 of 11
Jeremy Laurentowski May 6, 2022
Moorpark Watershed, Parks and
Recreation Conservation Authority
799 Moorpark Avenue
Moorpark, CA 93021
Moorpark Watershed, Parks, Recreation and Conservation Authority – Proposition 68 Planning and
Design Grant Trail Project - Feasibility Study
Dear Jeremy,
The Moorpark Watershed, Parks, Recreation and Conservation Authority (MWPRCA) is a Joint Powers
Authority (JPA) between the Santa Monica Mountains Conservancy and the City of Moorpark. The JPA
was established in 2016 in an effort to jointly acquire, develop, maintain, manage and conserve additional
park and open space. These areas would be used to provide restoration areas as well as, in the case of this
proposed project, provide pedestrian/equestrian/bicycle access from Moorpark to adjoining communities.
As part of conservation efforts, the City of Moorpark acquired an 80 acre parcel (APN 519-0-210-055)
located west of Moorpark Road, south of Tierra Rejada Road and north of the gated community of
Lexington Hills and transferred the property to the MWPRCA for management of the parcel. . The parcel
is open space with unimproved access roads utilized by various easement holders on the property (SCE and
Camrosa primarily). It has rolling topography and a natural drainage (Arroyo Santa Rosa) that bisects the
property in the southern quarter of the parcel. Ventura County Watershed Protection District is the
regulatory agency over the drainage. The MWPRCA envisioned that the parcel could be used to create a
trail network that would extend from the City of Moorpark border on the northern parcel boundary toward
a point of connection with parcels owned by Conejo Recreation and Park District (CRPD) and the Conejo
Open Space Conservation Agency (COSCA). The CRPD parcel would provide indirect access to the City
of Thousand Oaks and the COSCA parcels. The nearest CRPD owned parcel (APN 592-0-110-545) is
located south of Moorpark Road and is approximately 2,500 feet from the MWPRCA owned parcel. The
trail would be located within the MWPRCA parcel and then within primarily County of Ventura public
right of way.
Background
In June 2021, the Moorpark Watershed, Parks, Recreation and Conservation Authority (MWPRCA)
retained Phoenix Civil Engineering, Inc. (Phoenix) to develop a conceptual layout of a
pedestrian/equestrian/bicycle natural surface trail as part of the Proposition 68 Planning and Design Grant.
The project alignment was to start from a future parking lot off of Moorpark Road (approximately mid-
parcel) and lead south to a point of connection to a parcel owned by CRPD. The scope of services included
efforts to obtain an aerial topographic survey of the project area, prepare a 30% design package set of
conceptual trail alignment plans and develop a preliminary Opinion of Probable Construction Cost (OPCC)
for the proposed project. The 30% design efforts would be utilized by MWPRCA to pursue grant funding
for 100% design drawings, and ultimately to pursue grant funding for the proposed trail improvements.
283
MWPRCA Feasibility Study
Pedestrian Trail Grant Project Page 2 of 11
Conceptual Alignment Layouts
The proposed trail had several issues that had to be addressed. Those issues included:
• Transition across the drainage on the property and the associated regulatory permitting process.
• Trail alignment along the frontage of Lexington Hills Homeowner’s Association community
landscaped frontage along Moorpark Road.
• Public access easements will need to be acquired over private property f or portions of the trail
alignment in front of Lexington Hills.
• Layout of the trail along the road right of way between the Lexington Hills HOA boundary and the
intersection of Santa Rosa Road and Moorpark Road. Existing road slope would require
modifications to allow for the full trail width
• Negotiating the signalized intersection of Moorpark Road and Santa Rosa Road
• Alignment along an existing natural drainage channel on the south side of Moorpark Road and east
of the intersection with Santa Rosa Road
• Crossing of the existing parcel frontage (Nature’s Best Tree Farm) as well as the existing Southern
California Edison easements
In 2021, a site walk on the MWPRCA parcel developed two potential alignment alternatives for the trail.
Both alignments can be seen on the figures in Appendix A and below. The first alignment crosses the
drainage channel which would require a bridge to be installed, continues south to the southern end of the
property, transitions to behind the back of curb along the landscaped frontage of the Lexington Hills HOA
property entrance. From that location, it would cross the HOA entrance/exit, continue south along
Moorpark Road and then transition up the side of the slope to an existing unimproved trail located on the
hillside. The existing trail terminates at the northwest corner of the intersection of Moorpark Road and
Santa Rosa Road. Trail users would utilize the existing crosswalks at the intersection located on the north
and east sides. Pedestrian/equestrian push buttons are already installed on the traffic signal poles. Once
across the intersection, trail users would continue east along Moorpark Road on a trail separated from the
paved vehicle travel way to the terminus on the COSCA parcel.
Trail East of Intersection with Santa Rosa Road along Moorpark Road
284
MWPRCA Feasibility Study
Pedestrian Trail Grant Project Page 3 of 11
The trail alternate alignments have two components that differ from the preferred alignment. Namely, the
first alternate alignment is located on the MWPRCA parcel. Rather than cross the drainage with a bridge,
the trail crosses a smaller drainage farther north on the parcel and the trail ascends from the parcel to a point
where it crosses the existing drainage pipes that are located underneath Moorpark Road. By doing so,
several regulatory permits are avoided as well as the associated costs of the permitting and environmental
analysis. The disadvantage of this alternate alignment is that it places the trail users at the same elevation
as the pavement on Moorpark Road as well as closer to vehicular traffic which has safety issues as well as
aesthetic issues for the trail users.
Alignment Options on MWPRCA Parcel
The second alignment modification associated with the alternative alignments is the trail crossing Moorpark
Road at Read Road and being installed on the east side of Moorpark Road rather than across the Lexington
Hills HOA frontage and community entrance. Several disadvantages exist with this alignment such as:
• The increased cost to construct a retaining wall structure up to 20 feet in height to accommodate
the trail width.
• Securing several easements on private parcels.
• A signalized intersection or trail user crossing at Read Road. There are inherent safety issues with
this crossing such as sight distance and proximity to the existing signalized intersection at
Moorpark Road and Santa Rosa Road.
The two alignments can be seen on the figures in Appendix A.
Once the conceptual alignments were identified, contact was made with the County of Ventura to discuss
the drainage crossing on the parcel as well as the encroachment into the unimproved drainage along
Moorpark Road east of the intersection with Santa Rosa Road.
Regulatory Agency Input
The project traverses the MWPRCA parcel, existing County of Ventura public right of way, encroaches
into two existing drainage facilities, and crosses two homeowner associations. Once the preliminary
alignments were established, the next step in the process on the project was to present the proposed project
to the private and regulatory public agencies. Recognizing that there were numerous regulatory agencies
285
MWPRCA Feasibility Study
Pedestrian Trail Grant Project Page 4 of 11
that were going to review and provide input on the proposed trail, initial contact was made with the
following departments:
• County of Ventura Planning Department
• County of Ventura Roads Department
• County of Ventura Watershed Protection District
• City of Thousand Oaks
• Santa Rosa Valley Municipal Advisory Council (MAC)
• Lexington Hills Home Owners Association
• Hidden Meadows Home Owners Association
The Arroyo Santa Rosa drainage exists on the MWPRCA parcel and traverses from east to west. There are
several drainage pipes that are located underneath Moorpark Road that allow flow from the east side to
cross underneath Moorpark Road and continue west towards the junction with Calleguas Creek farther west.
The Arroyo Santa Rosa across the MWPRCA parcel is undeveloped. It is classified as a blue line channel
according to the County of Ventura Watershed Protection District (VCWPD). There are eight similar sized
drainage pipelines and one large diameter pipeline that cross under the road. Initial contact was made with
VCWPD on June 10th 2021. A meeting was held to discuss the trail crossing of the Arroyo Santa Rosa on
the MWPRCA parcel as well as the impacts to the unnamed drainage along Moorpark Road east of the
intersection with Santa Rosa Road. In the meeting, VCWPD staff indicated that a hydrology/hydraulic
analysis would be necessary along with an encroachment permit application for both crossings. It would
be necessary to demonstrate that the proposed improvements (bridge at Arroyo Santa Rosa and retaining
wall on the drainage) would not adversely affect the existing hydraulics of the streams. In addition to the
VCWPD approvals, the Arroyo Santa Rosa will require a permit from the US Army Corps of Engineers
and California Department of Fish and Wildlife. Both agencies will require an environmental analysis
report (Mitigated Negative Declaration, likely) for the impacts of the improvements at the locations.
The next agency contacted was the County of Ventura Roads Department. A meeting was held with Roads
Department staff on June 23, 2021 to discuss the project and any concerns or permits they would require.
The Roads Department indicated that the existing intersection is already set up for equestrian use (push
buttons for the crosswalks) and did not have any additional engineering requirements for the intersection.
There was some concern that during heavy traffic times of the day, there might be some modifications
considered to allow for increased crosswalk usage associated with the trail. However, at this point in the
concept study phase, little is known about the potential impacts. They did mention that engineered plans
would be required to be reviewed for the section of trail that is east of the intersection. There was some
concern expressed with the proposed trail/road separation fencing. Department staff suggested that
consideration be made for something that might provide more of a barrier between the trail users and the
vehicles. They acknowledged that the trail would be located sufficiently west of the existing traveled way
as the trail leaves the MWPRCA parcel and across the Lexington Hills HOA parcel. They did confirm that
the right of way lines shown on the plans are what they show in their records. When presenting the alternate
alignment crossing Moorpark Road at Read Road, they were not in favor of that concept. They indicated
that an engineering study would be needed for that proposed crossing. There are concerns about the
crossing being located on a curve in the road, with ascending travel ways on both sides of the crossing
creating a potential sight distance issue between the trail users and the vehicles. Additionally, there was
some concern about the proximity of the signalized intersection at Moorpark and Santa Rosa Road and
Moorpark Road to the proposed signalized intersection. They acknowledged that the trail alignment
alternate was going to have more concerns and require more analysis than the proposed alignment.
Ultimately, the trail would require an encroachment permit and a design plan review by the County of
Ventura Roads Department.
286
MWPRCA Feasibility Study
Pedestrian Trail Grant Project Page 5 of 11
Alternate Trail Alignment
On July 21, 2021, a meeting was held with the County of Ventura Planning Department staff to review and
discuss the proposed trail alignment. At that meeting, they were very supportive of the project. They also
indicated that the project appeared to provide a connection to an existing trail master plan that was prepared
for the County of Ventura Planning Department. The Santa Rosa Valley Trail Master Plan was a study
prepared for the County in conjunction with Santa Rosa Valley Trails, Inc. a 501c3 charitable organization
dedicated to providing trail access in the Santa Rosa Valley, as well as the Santa Rosa Valley Municipal
Advisory Council. The proposed MWPRCA trail provides a much needed link to the Santa Rosa Valley
trail system when it is all completed. The Planning Department also provided contact information for the
Santa Rosa Valley MAC and the Hidden Meadows HOA.
City of Thousand Oaks Public Works representatives and COSCA representatives met to discuss the
proposed trail project on August 31, 2021. At that meeting, an overview of the proposed trail was provided.
When discussing the project with the County Roads Department, it was mentioned that the County had
jurisdiction of the right of way along Santa Rosa Road and Moorpark Road north from the intersection with
Santa Rosa Road, but the City of Thousand Oaks was the authority having jurisdiction over the right of way
east of the intersection. The group was supportive of the project and echoed the statements and concerns
from the County regarding the trail barrier along Moorpark Road being substantial enough to protect the
trail users from the vehicles traveling along Moorpark Road. COSCA representatives were supportive of
the project. It was discussed that the design of the future trail on the COSCA property was going to pose
some challenges that would need to be addressed at that time. The group mentioned that there is an existing
SCE easement for aerial utilities along Moorpark Road and along the western boundary of the COSCA
property. The design of the trail would need to coordinate crossing that easement and coordinating the
design to meet the SCE requirements for pole clearances as well as incorporating the existing pole locations
into the trail and retaining wall design along Moorpark Road. Coordination across the driveway entrance
to the nursery property west of the COSCA parcel would be needed.
Adjacent Community Input
Three community groups were identified by the County of Ventura Planning Department that would be
impacted by the proposed trail project: Santa Rosa Valley MAC, Hidden Meadows HOA and Lexington
287
MWPRCA Feasibility Study
Pedestrian Trail Grant Project Page 6 of 11
Hills HOA. Each of the three groups were contacted and attendance at their regularly scheduled meetings
was performed by the study team to present the project and discuss any concerns with the respective groups.
A meeting with the Hidden Meadows HOA was held on October 28, 2021 and November 8, 2021. The
initial meeting was held with one member of the HOA to review the project and to set up the meeting with
the remainder of the HOA at one of their regular meetings. On November 8, 2021, the group met with the
HOA members to review the project and discuss any concerns that they might have. The HOA was
supportive of the project and expressed that there might be an opportunity to include some of their internal
trail network as connections to the proposed trail project once it is in design. One of the members of the
HOA is also active in Santa Rosa Valley Trails Inc. and was very familiar with the trail master plan. The
HOA voted to support the trail as it would provide an eastern link to other trails in the area. The vote passed
unanimously.
A project presentation to the Santa Rosa Valley MAC was held at one of their regularly scheduled MAC
meetings on November 18, 2021. At that meeting, a presentation was provided to the group outlining the
trail project, the status of other contacts support for the project, the timing of the trail alignment and funding.
The MAC did not formally take a vote on the trail, but individually provided verbal support for the trail
alignment and concept and were interested in the project development as it moves forward through the grant
funding and eventual design/construction.
The last group contacted regarding the project was the Lexington Hills HOA. Initial meetings were held
with two of the HOA Board members to discuss the project and seek input/opinions regarding the project
alignments. A subsequent meeting with the Lexington HOA Board was held on April 5, 2022. At that
meeting, the trail project was presented and discussed with the HOA members. There was initial support
for the trail concept, but there were concerns expressed by some members about the alignment crossing the
entrance to the HOA.
Lexington Hills HOA Entrance Crossing
After an extended discussion, one of the HOA Board members stated that they were going to meet with the
other members of the community that had concerns with a printed set of plans to better understand their
concerns.
288
MWPRCA Feasibility Study
Pedestrian Trail Grant Project Page 7 of 11
Considerations
The project will require several items to be completed as part of the design process and eventual
construction. From the discussions with the community groups as well as the regulatory agencies the
anticipated permitting and cooperative processes are summarized in Table 1, below.
Summary of Discussions
In the discussions with all of the regulatory and community groups, the project received support and positive
feedback. The project will have some issues that will need to be addressed during the design of the
alignment. Namely, certain alignments will require extensive study and analysis as well as permitting
reviews and approvals as mentioned above to allow for the event ual construction of the project. Overall,
the local community groups were supportive of the trail alignment concepts. Many agreed to provide verbal
support for the group once it gets to the funding and design stages. Funding for the project will need to be
addressed. The next section discusses the projected project costs.
289
MWPRCA Feasibility Study
Pedestrian Trail Grant Project Page 8 of 11
TABLE 1- PROJECT REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS AND
COMMUNITY CONCERN SUMMARY
Agency/Community Comments
County of Ventura
Planning
Administrative permit/environmental report
Coordinate with Santa Rosa Valley MAC regarding trail connections
County of Ventura
Roads Department
Encroachment Permit and Design Plans Review
Trail Barrier Concerns at Moorpark Road East of Intersection of Moorpark
Road and Santa Rosa Valley Road
Traffic Study if Read Road Crossing Pursued
Environmental Document Preparation for Read Road Crossing
Ventura County
Watershed Protection
District
Regulatory Permits for Crossing Arroyo Santa Rosa Channel (VCWPD,
California Department of Fish and Wildlife, Army Corps of Engineers and
Regional Water Quality Control Board
Environmental Analysis and Studies to Support the Permit Approvals
Hydrology/Hydraulic Study for the Bridge Alignment as well as the Drainage
Adjacent to Moorpark Road East of the Intersection with Santa Rosa Valley
Road
Encroachment Permit for the Trail along the Drainage
City of Thousand Oaks Coordinate any Traffic Signal Modifications at the Intersection of Moorpark
Road and Santa Rosa Road
Encroachment Permit
Santa Rosa Valley
Municipal Advisory
Council
Continued Coordination with their Group
Coordination on the Use of the Unimproved Trail at the NW corner of the
Intersection of Moorpark Road and Santa Rosa Valley Road
Hidden Meadows HOA Continued Coordination with their Group Especially as it relates to their
Community Entrance and any Impacts
Lexington Hills HOA Continued Coordination with their Group Especially as it relates to their
Community Entrance and any Impacts
Secondary Fire Access Consideration
290
MWPRCA Feasibility Study
Pedestrian Trail Grant Project Page 9 of 11
Opinion of Probable Construction Cost
A concept level Opinion of Probable Construction Cost was prepared for the project alignment s. The
Preferred Alignment includes the bridge crossing of the creek and the trail located across the Lexington
Hills HOA entrance. The Alternate Alignment includes a bridge crossing the top of the drainage pipes on
the MWPRCA parcel and the signalized crossing at Read Road. Costs associated with design,
environmental, permitting and construction were estimated and included in the overall project total. Costs
associated with right of way acquisition (easements) are not included in these estimates and would be
considered additional costs. Tables 2 (Preferred Alignment) and 3 (Alternate Alignment) show the range
of project costs based on the conceptual alignment.
TABLE 2: OPINION OF PROBABLE CONSTRUCTION COST – PREFERRED ALIGNMENT
Description Cost Range
Mobilization/Demobilization $113,000
Permitting $50,000 to $62,500
Traffic Control $25,000 to $31,000
Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan $25,000 to $31,000
Clearing, Grubbing, Demolition $65,000 to $81,000
Earthwork $100,000 to $125,000
Trail Surface $528,000 to $660,000
Trail Fencing $110,000 to $137,500
Moorpark Road Drainage Retaining Wall $650,000 to $813,000
Arroyo Santa Rosa Creek Bridge $250,000 to $313,000
Subtotal Project $1,916,000 to $2,367,000
Design $460,000 to $568,000
Environmental Permitting $400,000 to $500,000
Construction Management $184,000 to $284,000
Contractor Overhead and Profit $384,000 to $473,000
Contingency $479,000 to $592,000
Total $3,823,000 to $4,784,000
291
MWPRCA Feasibility Study
Pedestrian Trail Grant Project Page 10 of 11
TABLE 3: OPINION OF PROBABLE CONSTRUCTION COST – ALTERNATE ALIGNMENT
Description Cost Range
Mobilization/Demobilization $212,000
Permitting $50,000 to $62,500
Traffic Control $25,000 to $31,000
Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan $25,000 to $31,000
Clearing, Grubbing, Demolition $65,000 to $81,000
Earthwork $100,000 to $125,000
Trail Surface $396,000 to $495,000
Trail Fencing $110,000 to $137,500
Moorpark Road Drainage Retaining Wall $650,000 to $813,000
Moorpark Road Slope Retaining Wall $1,100,000 to $1,375,000
Read Road Signal Improvements $750,000 to $937,000
Moorpark Drain Pipe Crossing Bridge $125,000 to $156,000
Subtotal Project $3,608,000 to $4,456,000
Design $866,000 to $1,070,000
Environmental Permitting $250,000 to $313,000
Construction Management $346,000 to $535,000
Contractor Overhead and Profit $722,000 to $891,000
Contingency $902,000 to $1,114,000
Total $6,694,000 to $8,379,000
Values in the table have been rounded to the nearest thousand. An Opinion of Probable Construction Cost
is provided with notes detailing the items as Appendix C.
292
MWPRCA Feasibility Study
Pedestrian Trail Grant Project Page 11 of 11
Thank you for the opportunity to work with the Moorpark Watershed, Parks, Recreation and Conservation
Authority in preparing this study.
Sincerely,
___________________________
Jon Turner, PE
Principal Engineer
293
Appendix
• Appendix A – Conceptual Alignment Layout Sheets
• Appendix B – MWPRCA Pedestrian Trail Photo Log
• Appendix C – Opinion of Probable Construction Cost
294
Appendix A
Conceptual Alignment Layout Sheets
295
PHOENIX CIVIL ENGINEERING, INC.
DRAFT SUBMITTAL 6/5/12--
PEDESTRIAN/EQUESTRIAN TRAIL
MOORPARK WATERSHED, PARKS,
RECREATION, CONSERVATION AUTHORITY
EXHIBIT 1 - OVERALL
SCALE: 1" = 150'
PROPOSED TRAIL ALIGNMENT
TYPICAL TRAIL CROSS SECTION
PROPOSED TRAIL ALIGNMENT
ALTERNATIVE TRAIL ALIGNMENT
M
O
O
R
P
A
R
K
R
O
A
D
LE
X
I
N
G
T
O
N
H
I
L
L
S
D
R
SEE EXHIBIT 4
END TRAIL ALIGNMENT
12'DAYLIGHT AND MATCH
EXISTING GROUND
(RETAINING WALL WHERE REQ'D)GRADED DITCH FOR DRAINAGE
AND DAYLIGHT TO MATCH
EXISTING GROUND
PROPOSED 12-FT TRAIL
PROPOSED FENCE (TYP)
ALTERNATIVE TRAIL ALIGNMENT
EXIST. ROAD TRAIL
SEE EXHIBIT 5
RE
A
D
R
O
A
D
ALTERNATIVE TRAIL CROSSING
S
A
N
T
A
R
O
S
A
R
O
A
D
MO
O
R
P
A
R
K
R
O
A
D
SEE EXHIBIT 2
SEE EXHIBIT 3
(610
)
(605)
(610)
(6
8
5
)
(68
0
)
(675)
(67
0
)
(6
6
5
)
(66
0
)
(655)
(650)(645)(640)(635)(63
0
)
(62
5
)
(6
2
0
)
(615)
(610
)
(60
5
)
(
6
0
0
)
(605)
(610
)
(61
5
)
(620
)
(625
)
(630
)
(635)
(640)
(645
)
(65
0
)
(65
5
)
(700)
(690)
(680)
(670)
(660)
(650)
(640)
(6
3
0
)
(6
4
0
)
(6
4
5
)
(
6
4
5
)
(
6
5
0
)
(6
6
0
)
(6
7
0
)
(
6
8
0
)
(690)
(700)
(70
5
)
(
7
1
0
)
(
7
1
5
)
(
7
2
0
)
(
7
4
0
)
(
7
3
5
)
(
7
3
0
)
(
7
2
5
)
(71
5
)
(7
0
0
)
(580)
(575)
(570)
(5
8
5
)
(6
0
0
)
(62
0
)
(64
0
)
(66
0
)
(6
8
0
)
(62
0
)
(640)
(660)
(60
0
)
(580)
(570)(565)
(560)
(555
)
(
5
9
0
)
(
6
0
0
)
(6
1
0
)
(6
2
0
)
(
5
9
0
)
(
6
1
0
)
(
6
3
0
)
(
6
5
0
)
(
6
4
0
)
(
6
6
0
)
(6
7
0
)
(6
8
0
)
(
6
8
5
)
(
6
7
0
)
(
6
6
0
)
(
6
5
0
)
(
6
4
0
)
(6
5
0
)
(6
4
0
)
(6
2
0
)
(6
0
0
)
(
5
8
0
)
(
5
9
0
)
(605
)
(590
)
(600
)
(595)
(595
)
(600
)
(600)
(595)
(600)
(605)
(610)
(600)
(595)
(60
0
)
(60
0
)
(62
0
)
(6
3
0
)
(63
5
)
296
0+
0
0
1+00
2+00
3+00
4+005+00
6+00
7+00
8+00
9+
0
0
10+00
11+00
1
2
+
0
0
13
+
0
0
14
+
0
0
100+00
10
1
+
0
0
10
2
+
0
0
MO
O
R
P
A
R
K
R
D
MOORPARK ROAD
EXISTING DITCH
EXISTING EQUESTRIAN
CROSSING BUTTON
EXISTING EQUESTRIAN
CROSSING BUTTON
EXISTING EQUESTRIAN
CROSSING BUTTON
EXISTING DIRT TRAIL
PROPOSED TRAIL
ALIGNMENT
PROPOSED TRAIL
ALIGNMENT
EXISTING BRIDGE OVER
EXISTING DITCH
CONCEPTUAL PERSPECTIVE (LOOKING NORTH)
PHOENIX CIVIL ENGINEERING, INC.
--EXHIBIT 2 - SANTA ROSA
TYPICAL TRAIL CROSS SECTION
EXISTING CONCRETE
LINED DITCH
12'DAYLIGHT AND MATCH
EXISTING GROUND
PROPOSED 12-FT TRAIL
EQUESTRIAN TRAIL
PROPOSED FENCE (TYP)
TRAIL CROSSING ALIGNMENT AT SANTA ROSA ROAD INTERSECTION
SCALE: 1" = 80'
RETAINING WALL WHERE REQUIRED
EXISTING ROADDAYLIGHT AND MATCH
EXISTING GROUND
EXISTING POWER POLE
EXISTING POWER POLE
EXISTING POWER POLE
EXISTING POWER POLE
EXISTING POWER POLE
EXISTING CROSSWALK
ALTERNATIVE
TRAIL ALIGNMENT
EXISTING
POWER POLE
EXISTING POWER POLE
A1
A1
A2
CONCEPTUAL PERSPECTIVE (LOOKING EAST)A2
CONCEPTUAL PERSPECTIVE (LOOKING WEST)A3
A3
CONCEPTUAL PERSPECTIVE (LOOKING SOUTHEAST)A4
A4
CONCEPTUAL PERSPECTIVE (LOOKING NORTHEAST)A5
A5
CONCEPTUAL PERSPECTIVE (LOOKING NORTH)
EXISTING RIGHT-OF-WAY
EXISTING RIGHT-OF-WAY
EXISTING RIGHT-OF-WAY
EX
.
C
E
N
T
E
R
L
I
N
E
PEDESTRIAN/EQUESTRIAN TRAIL
MOORPARK WATERSHED, PARKS,
RECREATION, CONSERVATION AUTHORITY
SANTA ROSA
R
O
A
D
R/W
297
18+
0
0
19+
0
0
20+
0
0
21+00
22+00 23+0
0
24+00
25+00
26+00
+00
10
7
+
0
0
108
+
0
0
109
+
0
0
110
+
0
0
111+
0
0
112+0
0
MO
O
R
P
A
R
K
R
O
A
D
PROPOSED TRAIL ALIGNMENT
PHOENIX CIVIL ENGINEERING, INC.
--EXHIBIT 3 - LEXINGTON HILLS DR
TYPICAL TRAIL CROSS SECTION
SCALE: 1" = 40'
ALTERNATE TRAIL CROSSING AT
LEXINGTON HILLS DRIVE
LE
X
I
N
G
T
O
N
H
I
L
L
S
D
R
12'4:1 DAYLIGHT AND MATCH
EXISTING GROUND
GRADED DITCH FOR DRAINAGE
AND DAYLIGHT TO MATCH
EXISTING GROUND
PROPOSED 12-FT TRAIL
PROPOSED FENCE (TYP)
EXISTING CONCRETE
LINED DITCH
EXISTING POWER POLE
ALTERNATIVE
TRAIL ALIGNMENT
EXISTING WALL
EXISTING POWER POLE
EXISTING POWER POLE
PROPOSED TRAIL ALIGNMENT
EXISTING WALL
GATE/OPENING
AT EX. WALL
EQUESTRIAN TRAIL
RETAINING WALL WHERE REQUIRED
EXISTING ROAD
CONCEPTUAL PERSPECTIVE (LOOKING NORTH)A2
A1
CONCEPTUAL PERSPECTIVE (LOOKING WEST)A1
A1
EX. RIGHT-OF-WAY
EX. RIGHT-OF-WAY
EX. C
E
N
T
E
R
L
I
N
E
EX. RIGHT-OF-WAY
EX.
C
E
N
T
E
R
L
I
N
E
PEDESTRIAN/EQUESTRIAN TRAIL
MOORPARK WATERSHED, PARKS,
RECREATION, CONSERVATION AUTHORITY
LOT LINE
LOT LINE
298
MO
O
R
P
A
R
K
R
O
A
D
PROPOSED TRAIL ALIGNMENT
PHOENIX CIVIL ENGINEERING, INC.
--EXHIBIT 4 - NORTH CROSSING
TYPICAL TRAIL CROSS SECTION
12'DAYLIGHT AND MATCH
EXISTING GROUNDGRADED DITCH FOR DRAINAGE
AND DAYLIGHT TO MATCH
EXISTING GROUND
PROPOSED 12-FT TRAIL
SCALE: 1" = 60'
TRAIL CROSSING
EXISTING DITCH
PROPOSED FENCE (TYP)
EXISTING LARGE DIAMETER
DRAINAGE PIPELINES
ALTERNATIVE ALIGNMENT
NEW METAL BRIDGE
NEW WOOD BRIDGE
EQUESTRIAN TRAIL
RETAINING WALL
WHERE REQUIRED
EXISTING ROAD
A1
CONCEPTUAL PERSPECTIVE (LOOKING NORTHWEST)A1
CONCEPTUAL PERSPECTIVE (LOOKING SOUTHWEST)A2
A2
EX. RIGHT-OF-WAY
EX. PROPERTY LINE
EX. PROPERTY LINE
PEDESTRIAN/EQUESTRIAN TRAIL
MOORPARK WATERSHED, PARKS,
RECREATION, CONSERVATION AUTHORITY
38
+
0
0
39
+
0
0
4
0
+
0
0
41+00
4
2
+
0
0
43
+
0
0
44
+
0
0
45
+
0
0
46
+
0
0
47
+
0
0
48
+
0
0
49
+
0
0
50
+
0
0
39
+
0
0
40
+
0
0
41
+
0
0
42+
0
0
43+
0
0
44+
0
0
299
28 +00
29+00
30+0
0
31+0
0
32+
0
0
33
115+0
0
116+0
0
117+00 118+00 119+00 12
0
+
0
0
12
1
+
0
0
12
2
+
0
0
12
2
+
4
1
PROPOSED TRAIL ALIGNMENT
PHOENIX CIVIL ENGINEERING, INC.
--EXHIBIT 5 - ALT. CROSSING
TYPICAL TRAIL CROSS SECTION
12'DAYLIGHT AND MATCH
EXISTING GROUNDGRADED DITCH FOR DRAINAGE
AND DAYLIGHT TO MATCH
EXISTING GROUND
PROPOSED 12-FT TRAIL
SCALE: 1" = 60'
ALTERNATIVE TRAIL CROSSING
PROPOSED FENCE (TYP)
EQUESTRIAN TRAIL
RETAINING WALL
WHERE REQUIRED
EXISTING ROAD
EXISTING POWER POLE
EXISTING POWER POLE
MOO
R
P
A
R
K
R
O
A
D
REA
D
R
O
A
D
EXISTING POWER POLE
EXISTING POWER POLE
EXISTING POWER POLE
ALTERNATIVE TRAIL ALIGNMENT
ALTERNATIVE TRAIL
CROSSING
CONCEPTUAL PERSPECTIVE (LOOKING NORTHEAST)A1
A1
EX. RIGHT-OF-WAY
EX. PROPERTY LINE
EX. PROPERTY LINE
EX. RIGHT-OF-WAY
EX. RIGHT-OF-WAY
PEDESTRIAN/EQUESTRIAN TRAIL
MOORPARK WATERSHED, PARKS,
RECREATION, CONSERVATION AUTHORITY
300
Appendix B
MWPRCA Pedestrian Trail Photo Log
301
MWPRCA Pedestrian Trail Grant
1
Arroyo Santa Rosa and Drainage Piping Across MWPRCA Parcel Looking East
MWPRCA Parcel Entrance Looking Southwest
APPENDIX B
302
MWPRCA Pedestrian Trail Grant
2
Overview of the Arroyo Santa Rosa Drainage Piping Under Moorpark Road
Lexington Hills HOA Entrance Looking Southwest
303
MWPRCA Pedestrian Trail Grant
3
Intersection of Santa Rosa Valley Road and Moorpark Road Looking East
Existing Drainage on South Side of Moorpark Road Looking East from Intersection
304
Appendix C
Opinion of Probable Construction Cost
305
Item Description Unit Unit Cost Quantity Total Total
1 Mobilization/Demobilization LS $212,300 1 $212,300 $212,300
2 Permitting LS $50,000 1 $50,000 $62,500
3 Traffic Control LS $25,000 1 $25,000 $31,250
4 Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan LS $25,000 1 $25,000 $31,250
5 Clearing, Grubbing, Demolition LS $65,000 1 $65,000 $81,250
6 Earthwork LS $100,000 1 $100,000 $125,000
7 Trail Surface LS $396,000 1 $396,000 $495,000
8 Trail Fencing LS $110,000 1 $110,000 $137,500
9 Moorpark Road Drainage Retaining Wall LS $650,000 1 $650,000 $812,500
10 Moorpark Road Slope Retaining Wall LS $1,100,000 1 $1,100,000 $1,375,000
11 Read Road Signal Improvements LS $750,000 1 $750,000 $937,500
12 Moorpark Drain Pipe Crossing Bridge LS $125,000 1 $125,000 $156,250
Subtotal Project $3,608,000 $4,457,000
Design 20%$865,920 $1,069,680
Environmental Permitting $250,000 1 $250,000 $312,500
Construction Management 8% to 10%$346,368 $534,840
Contractor Overhead and Profit 20%$721,600 $891,400
Contingency 25%$902,000 $1,114,250
Total $6,694,000 $8,380,000
Notes
All unit costs include an additional allowance due to increased construction costs and current market conditions.
Mobilization, demobilization, and permitting include estimated permitting costs and an estimated mobilization/demobilization cost
consisting of 5% of the remainder of the project costs. Permitting is related to the environmental permits mentioned below plus the mitigation cost
Traffic control, construction signing and traffic maintenance is an assumed cost based on recent projects, and covers the costs of flaggers,
traffic control devices as needed, and other work necessary to provide traffic control. Traffic control is mainly focused on the Moorpark Road
construction area.
Stormwater pollution control includes all materials and labor necessary to comply with the SWPPP associated with the project, including
implementation of BMPs, use of a QSD, modifications to the SWPPP, etc.
Demolition, Clearing, and Grubbing includes removal of vegetation on the MWPRCA parcel and along the east side of Moorpark Road frontage
and two weeks of demolition activity. This includes removal of fence, grubbing of landscaped areas, and related work.
Earthwork includes work associated with minor grading on the MWPRCA parcel for the alternate alignment and leveling out the trail cross section and
parking lot areas.
Trail surface includes labor, equipment, materials, compaction, and related work. Costs are estimated based on recent projects. Surface is likely
decomposed granite.
Trail fencing includes the labor, material and equipment to install the rail fencing along one side of the alignment (approximately 5,500 feet long).
The Moorpark Road Drainage Retaining Wall includes the labor, materials and equipment for the 700 foot long retaining wall located east of the
intersection of Moorpark Road and Santa Rosa Road. Wall type will have to be selected during the design. It is assumed to be reinforced concrete
retaining wall construction approximately 8 feet in height.
The Moorpark Road Slope Retaining Wall includes the labor, materials and equipment for the 1000 foot long retaining wall located north of the
intersection of Moorpark Road and Santa Rosa Road. Wall type will have to be selected during the design. It is assumed to be reinforced concrete
retaining wall construction approximately 15 feet in height. Significant earthwork is included in this cost to shift the slope over approximately 15 feet.
Read Road signal improvements includes the signalized intersection for trail user crossing. Cost of the traffic study and analysis are included in the
alternate design cost.
Moorpark Watershed, Parks, Recreation and Conservation Authority
Trail Alignment Concept Study
Opinion of Probable Construction Cost
Range
Prepared By: Phoenix Civil Engineering, Inc.Page 1 of 1 Date Modified: 5/9/2022306