Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAGENDA REPORT 2023 0301 CCSA REG ITEM 09B POWERPOINTGeneral Plan Preview 3 Circulation and Noise March 1, 2023 1 Our Agenda 1.Overview 2.Public Outreach 3.Circulation Element 4.Noise Element 5.Comments and Confirmation Reminder: What Was the Process? 3 LAND USE PLAN VISION STATEMENT GOALS AND POLICIES PUBLIC HEARINGS AND ADOPTION SUMMER 2020 NOV 2020 –JAN 2021 JAN 2021 –FEB 2022 JAN 2022 –OCT 2022 FEB 2022 –FEB 2023 MAR –MAY 2023 PROGRAM EIR EXISTING CONDITIONS AND TRENDS HOUSING A Community -Driven Plan GPAC Meetings 1.10/01/2020: Project Overview and Community Attitudes Survey Results 2.10/22/2020: Visioning Activity 3.11/12/2020: Existing Conditions Findings 4.12/10/2020: Vision Statement Confirmation 5.02/25/2021: Opportunity Site Identification 1 6.03/18/2021: Opportunity Site Identification 2 7.04/29/2021: Land Use Types and Character 8.07/10/2021: Land Use Concepts 9.09/02/2021: Housing and RHNA Strategy 10.12/09/2021: Housing Policy 11.12/16/2021: Recommended Land Use Plan 12.03/31/2022: Open Space, Parks and Recreation, Conservation, Safety 13.04/28/2022: Land Use, Economic Development 14.06/23/2022: Mobility, Infrastructure 15.08/04/2022: Public Health, Environmental Justice, Noise 16.08/18/2022: Mobility (part 2) 17.10/27/2022: Implementation 18.01/17/2023: Draft General Plan Public Workshops 1.11/19/2020: Community Visioning Workshop 2.05/27/2021: Opportunity Sites and Land Uses 3.11/14/2021: Land Use Alternatives 4.09/24/2022: Goals and Policies 5.02/16/2023: Draft General Plan Surveys 1.Community Attitudes 2.Community Visioning 3.Land Use Concepts 4.Land Use Alternatives “Pop -Ups” and Community Events 1.Oct 2020: Halloween Trunk or Treat 2.Nov 2020: Rotary Club 3.Apr 2021: Earth Day 4.Oct 2021: Moorpark Country Days 5.Oct 2021: Halloween Trunk or Treat 6.Oct 2022: Moorpark Country Days A Community -Driven Plan Planning Commission Meetings 1.01/13/2022: Draft Housing Element 2.01/25/2022: Draft Land Use Plan 3.01/24/2023: Housing Element Recommendation 4.02/28/2023: Preview –Orientation, Outreach, and Zoning 5.04/25/2023: General Plan and EIR Recommendation 6.05/23/2023: Zoning Code Recommendation City Council Meetings 1.01/15/2020: Contract/Project Approval 2.09/02/2020: General Plan Kickoff and GPAC Selection 3.02/03/2021: Approval of Vision Statement 4.01/19/2022: Draft Housing Element 5.02/02/2022: Draft Land Use Plan 6.01/04/2023: Preview -Orientation, Outreach, and Zoning 7.01/18/2023: Preview –Land Use and Housing 8.02/15/2023: Housing Element Adoption 9.03/01/2023: Preview -Circulation and Noise 10.04/05/2023: Preview –Economic Development, Safety, OSCAR, Environmental Justice, Public Health and EIR 11.05/03/2023: General Plan Adoption and EIR Certification 12.06/07/2023: Zoning Code Adoption The Circulation Element (including mobility and infrastructure) Traffic Modeling Process The Ventura County Transportation Model has been used to analyze General Plan Update transportation conditions •Existing and buildout land use •Roadway network buildout (with additional streets) •Roadway volume-to-capacity level of service evaluation •Vehicle miles traveled analysis Level of Service (LOS) Quantitative measure based on vehicle volume or delay at intersections and road segments Measures the amount of congestion (using vehicle delay or volume-to-capacity) Purely a measure of vehicle operations, does not account for adjacent development or other modes of travel Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) 10 miles 10 miles 10 miles 10 Total VMT or 3.33 VMT per Capita 10 miles 10 miles 10 miles 30 Total VMT or 10 VMT per Capita The Amount of daily travel is measured by vehicle miles traveled (VMT) Auto- Oriented Land Use Patterns Land Use Supported by Multimodal Transportation VMT is the total length of all car trips (# Vehicle Trips x Distance) Vehicle Miles Traveled For Environmental Analysis As of July 2020, CEQA environmental analysis uses VMT instead of LOS to align with goals to reduce Greenhouse Gas Emissions and impacts of climate change. VMT is assessed per capita, per employee, or both, as an “efficiency metric”. VMT per capita is lower in denser areas with a diversity of land uses in proximity as opposed to isolated, distant land uses where walking, biking and transit are not options. CEQA analysis compares a Project’s VMT to a regional average (i.e., City, County, etc). LOS will remain a factor for determining a project’s consistency with the General Plan. Caltrans Roadways Implications of Caltrans roadway ownership (Walnut Cyn Rd/Moorpark Ave & Los Angeles Ave) •Subject to Caltrans roadway standards (lane widths, shoulders) •Moorpark works with Caltrans for improvements to roadways (e.g. Los Angeles Avenue Medians Project) •Caltrans classifies roadways as Principal Arterials •Caltrans has no plans for adding capacity on SR-23 (Walnut Cyn Rd/Moorpark Ave) ADD POLICY: Work with Caltrans to enact City’s goals for Walnut Cyn Rd/Moorpark Ave & Los Angeles Ave, and work with Ventura County and the Ventura County Transportation Commission Roadway Classifications, what role do they play? •Classification is the roadway hierarchy •Can describe the relationship of road lanes, sidewalks, bicycle lanes, and additional features •Cross-sections are primarily a guide for unbuilt roads •Circulation Element to include a range of right-of-way per classification to maintain existing roadway widths (where desired) •Guide consistency determinations for future Capital Improvement Programs ADD POLICY: Roadways not to be widened beyond current width without further study and Council approval Moorpark Roadway Network Roadway Classifications (Principal Arterial Options) Roadway Classifications (Principal Arterial Options) Example: Walnut Canyon Road/Moorpark Avenue Roadway Classifications (Minor Arterial Options) Example: Princeton Ave Roadway Classifications (Collector Options) Example: Campus Park Dr Roadway Shoulder Options Moorpark Bicycle Network What We Heard •Concerns about building out to ultimate roadway right-of-way (ROW), utilizing eminent domain and impacting adjacent land and the community •Recommendation to refine roadway classifications to allow flexibility in their application and reflect existing roadway widths and constraints •Recommended revisions to Roadway and Bikeway system maps Policy Updates GPAC Policy Updates •Roadways not to be widened beyond current width without further study, public consultation and Council approval. Eminent domain as last-resort and with public process. •Include policy to work with Caltrans to enact City’s goals for Walnut Cyn Rd/Moorpark Ave & Los Angeles Ave (state highways). •Include policy to work with Ventura County and the Ventura County Transportation Commission. •Transportation fee program funds should only be allocated to transportation uses. The Noise Element mobile + stationary + land use compatibility = quality of life Existing Noise Contours 60 dBA 65 dBA 70+ dBA Noise Goals Goal 1: The health, safety, and general welfare of the public are protected from adverse noise impacts. Goal 2: Existing and future land uses are compatible with current and projected local and regional noise conditions. Goal 3: Minimize noise impacts from non-transportation- related sources, motor vehicle traffic, and railroad operations on sensitive receptors. Proposed Land Use and Noise Compatibility Matrix Categories Land Use Categories Energy Average CNEL (measured in dB) <55 <60 <65 <70 <75 <80> Residential Low Density/Single Family, Duplex, , Mobile Homes A A B B C D D Multiple Family A A A/B B C D D Commercial Regional Hotel, Motel, Transient Lodging A A A/B B C C D Commercial, Retail Commercial Retail, Bank, Restaurant, Movie Theater A A A A B B C Commercial, Industrial, Institutional Office Building, Research and Development, Professional Offices, City Office Building A A A A/B B C/D D Commercial Recreation, Institutional Civic Center Amphitheater, Concert Hall, Auditorium, Meeting Hall B B B B/C C C/D D Open Space Golf Course, Cemeteries, Nature Centers, Wildlife Reserves, Wildlife Habitat A A A B B D D Industrial, Utilities, Institutional Automobile Service Station, Auto Dealership, Manufacturing, Warehousing, Wholesale, Utilities A A A A A/B B B Institutional General Hospital, Church, Library, Schools, Nursing Homes A A A B C D D Open Space Parks A A A B C D D Commercial Recreation Children’s Amusement Park, Miniature Golf Course, Go-cart track, Equestrian Center, Sports Club A A A A B C C Agriculture Agriculture A A A A B C C Source: Moorpark General Plan Nosie Element. Zone A –Clearly Compatible: Specified land use is satisfactory, based upon the assumption that any buildings involved are of normal conventional construction without any buildings involved are of normal convention construction without any special noise insulation requirement. Zone B –Normally Compatible: New construction or development should be undertaken only after detailed analysis of the noise reduction requirements are made and needed noise insulation features in the design are determined. Conventional construction, with closed windows and fresh air supply systems or air conditioning will normally suffice. Zone C –Normally Incompatible: New construction or development should generally be discouraged. If new construction or development does proceed, a detailed analysis of noise reduction requirements must be made and needed noise insulation features included in the design. Zone D –Clearly Incompatible: New construction or development should generally not be undertaken. Staff Recommendation Provide input and confirmation that the Draft Circulation and Noise Elements address the community’s future needs