Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAGENDA REPORT 2023 0419 CCSA REG ITEM 09ACITY OF MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA City Council Meeting of April 19, 2023 ACTION RECEIVED PRESENTATION. BY A. Hurtado. A. Consider the 2022 National Community Survey Results. Staff Recommendation: Receive and file the 2022 National Community Survey report. (Staff: Troy Brown, City Manager) Item: 9.A. MOORPARK CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT TO: Honorable City Council FROM: Troy Brown, City Manager DATE: 04/19/2023 Regular Meeting SUBJECT: Consider the 2022 National Community Survey Results SUMMARY In advance of the biennial Goal Setting Process with the City Council, the City administers the National Community Survey (NCS). This information is used to assist Council and staff with community priorities as identified by residents as the goal setting process begins. The data also serves as a point-in-time indication of how residents feel about the progress the City has made toward the identified priorities (and the quality of services offered by the City) over the prior two-year period. The City received the results of the 2022 NCS which was conducted in late 2022 by the National Research Center, Inc (NRC). This is the second time the City has participated in the NCS. NRC maintains a database of comparative resident opinions comprised of perspectives gathered in surveys from over 600 communities. The communities in the database represent a wide geographic and population range. Moorpark’s responses are compared to other residents’ sentiment in their community which serves as a benchmark to measure our data against. This methodology allows the City to analyze resident responses in the context of how statistically our services and environment rank among similar services within other communities. The survey was sent to 2,800 randomly selected Moorpark households in November 2022. A total of 465 completed surveys were obtained, providing an overall response rate of 17%. The “confidence interval” (margin of error) is no greater than plus or minus four and a half percentage points around any given percent reported for the entire sample. The results have been weighted to reflect the demographic profile of the community. The survey also compares Moorpark resident’s overall satisfaction with city services against cities of a similar size across the country. This information is helpful in understanding how residents in similarly sized cities compare to Moorpark residents. Item: 9.A. 1 Honorable City Council 04/19/2023 Regular Meeting Page 2 Overall results are very positive, despite other external economic factors facing respondents. DISCUSSION Report of Results – Highlights from 2022 Community Livability Survey: Quality of Life: 2020 % excellent or good 2022 % excellent or good Overall Quality of Life in Moorpark: 88% 95% Moorpark as a place to live: 92% 95% Recommend living in Moorpark to someone who asks: 95% (very or somewhat likely) 93% (very or somewhat likely) Governance: 2020 % excellent or good 2022 % excellent or good Overall Customer Service by Moorpark employees: 89% 85% Quality of Services provided by the City of Moorpark: 76% 72% Treating residents with respect: 77% 67% Economy: 2020 % excellent or good 2022 % excellent or good Overall quality of business and service establishments in Moorpark: 57% 62% Moorpark as a place to work: 49% 49% Cost of living in Moorpark: 39% 38% Mobility: 2020 % excellent or good 2022 % excellent or good Ease of public parking: 81% 76% Street Cleaning: 80% 83% Street Lighting: 80% 72% Community Design: 2020 % excellent or good 2022 % excellent or good Your neighborhood as a place to live: 93% 93% Well-designed neighborhoods: 77% 71% Overall appearance of Moorpark: 77% 77% Utilities: 2020 % excellent or good 2022 % excellent or good Storm water management: 82% 80% Garbage collection: 88% 87% Affordable high speed internet access: 65% 52% Perceptions of Safety: 2020 % excellent or good 2022 % excellent or good Overall feeling of safety in Moorpark: 96% 93% In neighborhood during the day: 98% (very or somewhat safe) 98% (very or somewhat safe) In downtown during the day: 95% (very or somewhat safe) 94% (very or somewhat safe) 2 Honorable City Council 04/19/2023 Regular Meeting Page 3 Natural Environment: 2020 % excellent or good 2022 % excellent or good Overall quality of natural environment in Moorpark: 89% 83% Air quality: 86% 79% Cleanliness of Moorpark: 86% 86% Parks and Recreation: 2020 % excellent or good 2022 % excellent or good Overall quality of parks and recreation opportunities: 88% 91% Recreation programs and classes: 82% 78% Availability of paths and walking trails: 75% 65% Health and Wellness: 2020 % excellent or good 2022 % excellent or good Availability of affordable quality food: 64% 59% Overall health and wellness opportunities in Moorpark: 76% 74% Availability of affordable quality mental health care: 30% 34% Education, Arts and Culture: 2020 % excellent or good 2022 % excellent or good Public library services: 80% 74% Overall opportunities for education, culture and the arts: 62% 66% K-12 education: 84% 82% Inclusivity and Engagement: 2020 % excellent or good 2022 % excellent or good Moorpark as a place to raise children: 96% 95% Sense of community: 79% 77% Making all residents feel welcome: 78% 80% Key Findings Upward trends indicate that Moorpark’s economy is on the rise. Many results related to the economy showed significant growth since 2020, with 61% of residents rating the overall economic health of the city as excellent or good which represents a 15% increase since 2020. The survey revealed 3 in 10 residents positively rated the vibrancy of downtown/commercial areas, a 12-point increase since the 2020 survey results. When asked what impact if any, the economy would likely have on their family income in the next six months, only 20% of residents expected the impact to be somewhat or very positive, on par with the national benchmark. Most residents feel a strong sense of safety in Moorpark. High ratings of importance (92% excellent or very important) and quality (93% excellent or good) to the overall feeling of safety in Moorpark, suggesting that safety remains a priority and a strength for the community. Close to 9 in 10 felt safe in the city’s downtown/commercial area and from violent crime. Roughly 8 in 10 participants highly rated crime prevention, animal control, fire prevention, and education. All safety-related items on the survey were on par with or higher than national benchmark standards. 3 Honorable City Council 04/19/2023 Regular Meeting Page 4 Ratings for survey items related to the city’s natural environment tended to be positive and on par with or above national averages, about 83% of resident gave excellent or good reviews on this topic. Many of the participants, about 9 in 10 offered a positive evaluation of the city’s cleanliness, scoring higher than national benchmarks. Results related to parks and recreation were also overwhelmingly positive. A large number of residents, about 9 in 10, are pleased with the overall quality of parks and recreational opportunities, while about 8 in 10 favorably rated City parks, recreation programs/classes, and recreational centers/facilities. Custom Questions The City Council approved the inclusion of custom questions in the 2022 survey. The purpose of the survey was to garner input from residents in two categories. First, the Council sought to gather information about future investments into recreational facilities. To collect that information, the following question was posed to participants, “Please rate how much of a priority, if at all, you think it is for Moorpark to invest in the following parks and recreation facilities and amenities if additional funding is available.” Participants were provided a myriad of potential facilities and amenities (in a randomized order for each survey) and asked to categorize each as a high, medium, low, or no priority. The results are depicted in the graph below which shows those amenities ranked, in order, as high priorities among respondents: Chart 1 Please rate how much of priority, if at all, you think it is for Moorpark to invest in the following parks and recreation facilities and amenities if additional city funding is available. There were two custom questions included in the 2022 survey related to mental health services. The questions on mental health were selected to garner additional input into the need for and type of service needed in the city following the pandemic. It is widely known through research and studies that the COVID-19 crisis precautions introduced (such as social distancing and self-isolation), coupled with the fear of medical emergencies and growing anxiety about the prolonged nature of the crisis, impacted the number of people suffering from mental health concerns across the US. The first custom 43% 38% 28%28% 24%21%19% 13%11%9%8%8%7% 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 45% 50% % High Priority Amenity Type 4 Honorable City Council 04/19/2023 Regular Meeting Page 5 question related to mental health was designed to identify the most critical service residents’ desire. Chart 2 Please rate how important, if at all, you think it is for Moorpark to attract providers of each of the following mental health services. The final custom question sought to gain information about perceived barriers to accessing mental health services. In this question, respondents were asked to identify the single-most pervasive obstacle to accessing mental health services in the city. Chart 3 Please indicate which of the following, if any, you believe is the single biggest barrier to accessing mental health service in Moorpark. (Select only one option.) In an effort to garner as much participation as possible, the City made available a web- based survey participants accessed through a link on the City’s website. Visitors to the site were able to complete the survey in December 2022 and 97 surveys were received. The data collected was outside of the random sampling of Moorpark households and it is unknown who in the community was aware of the link, and where respondents to the survey may reside. Therefore, a level of confidence in the representation of the web- y p 25% 25% 17% 13% 12% 3% 2% 1% 0%5%10%15%20%25%30% Cost of Services None /Don't Know Limited Availability of service Lack of Informa�on Insurance Coverage Social/societal S�gma Proximity to city Quality of services % of Respondents Barrier 48% 40%38% 30%29%28%27% 22% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% Suicide Preven�on Crisis Interven�on Psychiatric services Medica�on Services Ind. or Group Therapy Psychological Tes�ng Rehabilita�on Services Case Mngmnt. % Essen�al Service Type 5 Honorable City Council 04/19/2023 Regular Meeting Page 6 based responses cannot be estimated. The complete results of the web-based survey are included as a supplemental to the NCS. FISCAL IMPACT There is no fiscal impact associated with delivery of this 2022 National Community Survey. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Receive and file the 2022 National Community Survey report. Attachment: National Community Survey, 2022 Report of Results for Moorpark, California 6 Moorpark, CA The National Community Survey Report of Results 2022 Report by: Visit us online! www.polco.us ATTACHMENT 7 About The NCS™ The National Community Survey™ (The NCS™) report is about the “livability” of Moorpark. A livable community is a place that is not simply habitable, but that is desirable. It is not only where people do live, but where they want to live. The survey was developed by the experts from National Research Center at Polco. Great communities are partnerships of the government, private sector, community-based organizations and residents, all geographically connected. The NCS captures residents’ opinions considering ten central facets of a community: • Economy • Mobility • Community Design • Utilities • Safety • Natural Environment • Parks and Recreation • Health and Wellness • Education, Arts, and Culture • Inclusivity and Engagement The report provides the opinions of a representative sample of 465 residents of the City of Moorpark collected from November 9, 2022 to December 28, 2022. The margin of error around any reported percentage is 4.5% for all respondents and the response rate for the 2022 survey was 17%. Survey results were weighted so that the demographic profile of respondents was representative of the demographic profile of adults in Moorpark. How the results are reported For the most part, the percentages presented in the following tabs represent the “percent positive.” Most commonly, the percent positive is the combination of the top two most positive response options (i.e., excellent/good, very safe/somewhat safe, etc.). On many of the questions in the survey respondents may answer “don’t know.” The proportion of respondents giving this reply is shown in the full set of responses included in the tab “Complete data.” However, these responses have been removed from the analyses presented in most of the tabs. In other words, the tables and graphs display the responses from respondents who had an opinion about a specific item. Comparisons to benchmarks NRC’s database of comparative resident opinion is comprised of resident perspectives gathered in surveys from over 600 communities whose residents evaluated the same kinds of topics on The National Community Survey. The comparison evaluations are from the most recent survey completed in each community in the last five years. NRC adds the latest results quickly upon survey completion, keeping the benchmark data fresh and relevant. The communities in the database represent a wide geographic and population range. In each tab, Moorpark's results are noted as being “higher” than the benchmark, “lower” than the benchmark, or “similar” to the benchmark, meaning that the average rating given by Moorpark residents is statistically similar to or different (greater or lesser) than the benchmark. Being rated as “higher” or “lower” than the benchmark means that Moorpark's average rating for a particular item was more than 10 points different than the benchmark. If a rating was “much higher” or “much lower,” then Moorpark's average rating was more than 20 points different when compared to the benchmark. The survey was administered during the COVID-19 pandemic, a time of challenge for many local governments. While we provide comparisons to national benchmarks, it is important to note that much of the benchmark data was collected prior to the pandemic. This may impact how your City's 2022 ratings compare to other communities’ ratings from the past five years. Trends over time Trend data for Moorpark represent important comparison data and should be examined for improvements or declines*. Deviations from stable trends over time represent opportunities for understanding how local policies, programs, or public information may have affected residents' opinions. Changes between survey years have been noted with an arrow and the percent difference. If the difference is greater than six percentage points between the 2020 and 2022 surveys, the change is statistically significant. * In 2020, The NCS survey was updated to include new and refreshed items. Consequently, some of the trends may be impacted due to wording modifications that could have potentially altered the meaning of the item for the respondent. 1 8 About The NCS™The National Community Survey™ (The NCS™) report is about the“livability” of Moorpark. A livable community is a place that is not simplyhabitable, but that is desirable. It is not only where people do live, butwhere they want to live. The survey was developed by the experts fromNational Research Center at Polco.Great communities are partnerships of the government, private sector,community-based organizations and residents, all geographicallyconnected. The NCS captures residents’ opinions considering ten centralfacets of a community: • Economy • Mobility • Community Design • Utilities • Safety • Natural Environment • Parks and Recreation • Health and Wellness • Education, Arts, and Culture • Inclusivity and EngagementThe report provides the opinions of a representative sample of 465residents of the City of Moorpark collected from November 9, 2022 toDecember 28, 2022. The margin of error around any reported percentage is4.5% for all respondents and the response rate for the 2022 survey was17%. Survey results were weighted so that the demographic profile ofrespondents was representative of the demographic profile of adults inMoorpark.How the results are reportedFor the most part, the percentages presented in the following tabs represent the “percent positive.” Most commonly, thepercent positive is the combination of the top two most positive response options (i.e., excellent/good, very safe/somewhat safe,etc.). On many of the questions in the survey respondents may answer “don’t know.” The proportion of respondents giving thisreply is shown in the full set of responses included in the tab “Complete data.” However, these responses have been removedfrom the analyses presented in most of the tabs. In other words, the tables and graphs display the responses from respondentswho had an opinion about a specific item.Comparisons to benchmarksNRC’s database of comparative resident opinion is comprised of resident perspectives gathered in surveys from over 600communities whose residents evaluated the same kinds of topics on The National Community Survey. The comparisonevaluations are from the most recent survey completed in each community in the last five years. NRC adds the latest resultsquickly upon survey completion, keeping the benchmark data fresh and relevant. The communities in the database represent awide geographic and population range. In each tab, Moorpark's results are noted as being “higher” than the benchmark, “lower”than the benchmark, or “similar” to the benchmark, meaning that the average rating given by Moorpark residents is statisticallysimilar to or different (greater or lesser) than the benchmark. Being rated as “higher” or “lower” than the benchmark means thatMoorpark's average rating for a particular item was more than 10 points different than the benchmark. If a rating was “muchhigher” or “much lower,” then Moorpark's average rating was more than 20 points different when compared to the benchmark.The survey was administered during the COVID-19 pandemic, a time of challenge for many local governments. While we providecomparisons to national benchmarks, it is important to note that much of the benchmark data was collected prior to thepandemic. This may impact how your City's 2022 ratings compare to other communities’ ratings from the past five years. Trends over time Trend data for Moorpark represent important comparison data and should be examined for improvements or declines*. Deviations from stable trends over time represent opportunities for understanding how local policies, programs, or public information may have affected residents' opinions. Changes between survey years have been noted with an arrow and the percent difference. If the difference is greater than six percentage points between the 2020 and 2022 surveys, the change is statistically significant. * In 2020, The NCS survey was updated to include new and refreshed items. Consequently, some of the trends may be impacted due to wording modifications that could have potentially altered the meaning of the item for the respondent. 2 9 Conducting the survey The 2,800 randomly selected households received mailings beginning on November 9, 2022 and the survey remained open for seven weeks. The first mailing was a postcard inviting the household to participate in the survey. The next mailing contained a cover letter with instructions, the survey questionnaire, and a postage-paid return envelope. All mailings included a web link to give residents the opportunity to respond to the survey online. All follow-up mailings asked those who had not completed the survey to do so and those who had already done so to refrain from completing the survey again. About 2% of the 2,800 mailed invitations or surveys were returned because the household address was vacant or the postal service was unable to deliver the survey as addressed. Of the remaining 2,757 households that received the invitations to participate, 465 completed the survey, providing an overall response rate of 17%. The response rate was calculated using AAPOR’s response rate #2* for mailed surveys of unnamed persons. It is customary to describe the precision of estimates made from surveys by a “level of confidence” and accompanying “confidence interval” (or margin of error). A traditional level of confidence, and the one used here, is 95%. The 95% confidence interval can be any size and quantifies the sampling error or imprecision of the survey results because some residents’ opinions are relied on to estimate all residents’ opinions. The margin of error for the City of Moorpark survey is no greater than plus or minus four and a half percentage points around any given percent reported for all respondents (465 completed surveys). In addition to the randomly selected “probability sample” of households, a link to an online open participation survey was publicized by the City of Moorpark. The open participation survey was identical to the probability sample survey with two small updates; it included a map at the beginning asking where the respondent lives and a question about where they heard about the survey. The open participation survey was open to all city residents and became available on December 14, 2022. The survey remained open for two weeks. The data presented in the following tabs exclude the open participation survey data, but a tab at the end provides the complete frequency of responses to questions by the open participation respondents. The survey datasets were analyzed using all or some of a combination of the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS), R, Python and Tableau. For the most part, the percentages presented in the reports represent the “percent positive.” The percent positive is the combination of the top two most positive response options (i.e., excellent/good, very safe/somewhat safe, essential/very important, etc.), or, in the case of resident behaviors/participation, the percent positive represents the proportion of respondents indicating “yes” or participating in an activity at least once a month. On many of the questions in the survey respondents may answer “don’t know.” The proportion of respondents giving this reply is shown in the full set of responses included in the tab “Complete data”. However, these responses have been removed from the analyses presented in the reports. In other words, the tables and graphs display the responses from respondents who had an opinion about a specific item. Contact The City of Moorpark funded this research. Please contact PJ Gagajena of the City of Moorpark at pjgagajena@moorparkca.gov if you have any questions about the survey. Survey Validity See the Polco Knowledge Base article on survey validity at https://info.polco.us/knowledge/statistical-vali * See AAPOR's Standard Definitions for more information at https://www.aapor.org/Publications-Media/AAPOR-Journals/Standard-Definitions.aspx * Pasek, J. (2010). ANES Weighting Algorithm.  Retrieved from https://web.stanford.edu/group/iriss/cgi-bin/anesrake/resources/RakingDescription.pdf * Targets come from the 2010 Census and 2020 American Community Survey Unweighted Weighted Target* Age 18-34 35-54 55+ Area District 1 District 2 District 3 District 4 Hispanic origin No, not Spanish, Hispanic, or Latino Spanish, Hispanic, or Latino Housing tenure Own Rent Housing type Attached Detached Race & Hispanic origin Not white alone White alone, not Hispanic or Latino Sex Man Woman Sex/age Man 18-34 Man 35-54 Man 55+ Woman 18-34 Woman 35-54 Woman 55+ Analyzing the data Responses from mailed surveys were entered into an electronic dataset using a “key and verify” method, where all responses are entered twice and compared to each other. Any discrepancies were resolved in comparison to the original survey form. Range checks as well as other forms of quality control were also performed. Responses from surveys completed on Polco were downloaded and merged with the mailed survey responses. The demographics of the survey respondents were compared to those found in the 2010 Census and 2020 American Community Survey estimates for adults in the City of Moorpark. The primary objective of weighting survey data is to make the survey respondents reflective of the larger population of the community. The characteristics used for weighting were age, sex, race, Hispanic origin, housing type, housing tenure, and area. No adjustments were made for design effects. Weights were calculated using an iterative, multiplicative raking model known as the ANES Weighting Algorithm.* The results of the weighting scheme for the probability sample are presented in the following table. NRC aligns demographic labels with those used by the U.S. Census for reporting purposes, when possible. Some categories (e.g., age, race/Hispanic origin, housing type, and length of residency) are combined into smaller subgroups. Methods Selecting survey recipients All households within the City of Moorpark were eligible to participate in the survey. A list of all households within the zip codes serving Moorpark was purchased from Go-Dog Direct based on updated listings from the United States Postal Service. Since some of the zip codes that serve the City of Moorpark households may also serve addresses that lie outside of the community, the exact geographic location of each housing unit was compared to community boundaries using the most current municipal boundary file. Addresses located outside of the City of Moorpark boundaries were removed from the list of potential households to survey. Each address identified as being within city boundaries was further identified as being within one of four districts. From that list, addresses were randomly selected as survey recipients, with multi-family housing units (defined as those with a unit number) sampled at a rate of 53 compared to single family housing units. An individual within each household was selected using the birthday method. The birthday method selects a person within the household by asking the “person whose birthday has most recently passed” to complete the questionnaire. The underlying assumption in this method is that day of birth has no relationship to the way people respond to surveys. This instruction was contained in the introduction of the survey. 3 10 Conducting the surveyThe 2,800 randomly selected households received mailings beginning on November 9, 2022 and the survey remained open forseven weeks. The first mailing was a postcard inviting the household to participate in the survey. The next mailing contained acover letter with instructions, the survey questionnaire, and a postage-paid return envelope. All mailings included a web link togive residents the opportunity to respond to the survey online. All follow-up mailings asked those who had not completed thesurvey to do so and those who had already done so to refrain from completing the survey again.About 2% of the 2,800 mailed invitations or surveys were returned because the household address was vacant or the postalservice was unable to deliver the survey as addressed. Of the remaining 2,757 households that received the invitations toparticipate, 465 completed the survey, providing an overall response rate of 17%. The response rate was calculated usingAAPOR’s response rate #2* for mailed surveys of unnamed persons.It is customary to describe the precision of estimates made from surveys by a “level of confidence” and accompanying“confidence interval” (or margin of error). A traditional level of confidence, and the one used here, is 95%. The 95% confidenceinterval can be any size and quantifies the sampling error or imprecision of the survey results because some residents’ opinionsare relied on to estimate all residents’ opinions. The margin of error for the City of Moorpark survey is no greater than plus orminus four and a half percentage points around any given percent reported for all respondents (465 completed surveys).In addition to the randomly selected “probability sample” of households, a link to an online open participation survey waspublicized by the City of Moorpark. The open participation survey was identical to the probability sample survey with two smallupdates; it included a map at the beginning asking where the respondent lives and a question about where they heard about thesurvey. The open participation survey was open to all city residents and became available on December 14, 2022. The surveyremained open for two weeks. The data presented in the following tabs exclude the open participation survey data, but a tab atthe end provides the complete frequency of responses to questions by the open participation respondents. The survey datasets were analyzed using all or some of a combination of the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS), R, Python and Tableau. For the most part, the percentages presented in the reports represent the “percent positive.” The percent positive is the combination of the top two most positive response options (i.e., excellent/good, very safe/somewhat safe, essential/very important, etc.), or, in the case of resident behaviors/participation, the percent positive represents the proportion of respondents indicating “yes” or participating in an activity at least once a month. On many of the questions in the survey respondents may answer “don’t know.” The proportion of respondents giving this reply is shown in the full set of responses included in the tab “Complete data”. However, these responses have been removed from the analyses presented in the reports. In other words, the tables and graphs display the responses from respondents who had an opinion about a specific item. Contact The City of Moorpark funded this research. Please contact PJ Gagajena of the City of Moorpark at pjgagajena@moorparkca.gov if you have any questions about the survey. Survey Validity See the Polco Knowledge Base article on survey validity at https://info.polco.us/knowledge/statistical-vali * See AAPOR's Standard Definitions for more information at https://www.aapor.org/Publications-Media/AAPOR-Journals/Standard-Definitions.aspx * Pasek, J. (2010). ANES Weighting Algorithm.  Retrieved from https://web.stanford.edu/group/iriss/cgi-bin/anesrake/resources/RakingDescription.pdf * Targets come from the 2010 Census and 2020 American Community Survey Unweighted Weighted Target* Age 18-34 35-54 55+ Area District 1 District 2 District 3 District 4 Hispanic origin No, not Spanish, Hispanic, or Latino Spanish, Hispanic, or Latino Housing tenure Own Rent Housing type Attached Detached Race & Hispanic origin Not white alone White alone, not Hispanic or Latino Sex Man Woman Sex/age Man 18-34 Man 35-54 Man 55+ Woman 18-34 Woman 35-54 Woman 55+ 38% 34% 28% 41% 37% 22% 68% 26% 6% 24% 24% 26% 26% 26% 23% 26% 25% 11% 29% 30% 29% 27% 73% 27% 73% 13% 87% 22% 78% 22% 78% 10% 90% 75% 25% 75% 25% 82% 18% 57% 43% 55% 45% 74% 26% 50% 50% 55% 45% 56% 44% 19% 18% 14% 19% 16% 14% 21% 19% 15% 21% 18% 7% 36% 15% 5% 31% 12% 1% Analyzing the data Responses from mailed surveys were entered into an electronic dataset using a “key and verify” method, where all responses are entered twice and compared to each other. Any discrepancies were resolved in comparison to the original survey form. Range checks as well as other forms of quality control were also performed. Responses from surveys completed on Polco were downloaded and merged with the mailed survey responses. The demographics of the survey respondents were compared to those found in the 2010 Census and 2020 American Community Survey estimates for adults in the City of Moorpark. The primary objective of weighting survey data is to make the survey respondents reflective of the larger population of the community. The characteristics used for weighting were age, sex, race, Hispanic origin, housing type, housing tenure, and area. No adjustments were made for design effects. Weights were calculated using an iterative, multiplicative raking model known as the ANES Weighting Algorithm.* The results of the weighting scheme for the probability sample are presented in the following table. NRC aligns demographic labels with those used by the U.S. Census for reporting purposes, when possible. Some categories (e.g., age, race/Hispanic origin, housing type, and length of residency) are combined into smaller subgroups. MethodsSelecting survey recipientsAll households within the City of Moorpark were eligible to participate in the survey. A list of all households within the zip codesserving Moorpark was purchased from Go-Dog Direct based on updated listings from the United States Postal Service. Sincesome of the zip codes that serve the City of Moorpark households may also serve addresses that lie outside of the community,the exact geographic location of each housing unit was compared to community boundaries using the most current municipalboundary file. Addresses located outside of the City of Moorpark boundaries were removed from the list of potential householdsto survey. Each address identified as being within city boundaries was further identified as being within one of four districts.From that list, addresses were randomly selected as survey recipients, with multi-family housing units (defined as those with aunit number) sampled at a rate of 53 compared to single family housing units.An individual within each household was selected using the birthday method. The birthday method selects a person within thehousehold by asking the “person whose birthday has most recently passed” to complete the questionnaire. The underlyingassumption in this method is that day of birth has no relationship to the way people respond to surveys. This instruction wascontained in the introduction of the survey. 4 11 Conducting the surveyThe 2,800 randomly selected households received mailings beginning on November 9, 2022 and the survey remained open forseven weeks. The first mailing was a postcard inviting the household to participate in the survey. The next mailing contained acover letter with instructions, the survey questionnaire, and a postage-paid return envelope. All mailings included a web link togive residents the opportunity to respond to the survey online. All follow-up mailings asked those who had not completed thesurvey to do so and those who had already done so to refrain from completing the survey again.About 2% of the 2,800 mailed invitations or surveys were returned because the household address was vacant or the postalservice was unable to deliver the survey as addressed. Of the remaining 2,757 households that received the invitations toparticipate, 465 completed the survey, providing an overall response rate of 17%. The response rate was calculated usingAAPOR’s response rate #2* for mailed surveys of unnamed persons.It is customary to describe the precision of estimates made from surveys by a “level of confidence” and accompanying“confidence interval” (or margin of error). A traditional level of confidence, and the one used here, is 95%. The 95% confidenceinterval can be any size and quantifies the sampling error or imprecision of the survey results because some residents’ opinionsare relied on to estimate all residents’ opinions. The margin of error for the City of Moorpark survey is no greater than plus orminus four and a half percentage points around any given percent reported for all respondents (465 completed surveys).In addition to the randomly selected “probability sample” of households, a link to an online open participation survey waspublicized by the City of Moorpark. The open participation survey was identical to the probability sample survey with two smallupdates; it included a map at the beginning asking where the respondent lives and a question about where they heard about thesurvey. The open participation survey was open to all city residents and became available on December 14, 2022. The surveyremained open for two weeks. The data presented in the following tabs exclude the open participation survey data, but a tab atthe end provides the complete frequency of responses to questions by the open participation respondents. The survey datasets were analyzed using all or some of a combination of the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS), R, Python and Tableau. For the most part, the percentages presented in the reports represent the “percent positive.” The percent positive is the combination of the top two most positive response options (i.e., excellent/good, very safe/somewhat safe, essential/very important, etc.), or, in the case of resident behaviors/participation, the percent positive represents the proportion of respondents indicating “yes” or participating in an activity at least once a month. On many of the questions in the survey respondents may answer “don’t know.” The proportion of respondents giving this reply is shown in the full set of responses included in the tab “Complete data”. However, these responses have been removed from the analyses presented in the reports. In other words, the tables and graphs display the responses from respondents who had an opinion about a specific item. Contact The City of Moorpark funded this research. Please contact PJ Gagajena of the City of Moorpark at pjgagajena@moorparkca.gov if you have any questions about the survey. Survey Validity See the Polco Knowledge Base article on survey validity at https://info.polco.us/knowledge/statistical-vali * See AAPOR's Standard Definitions for more information at https://www.aapor.org/Publications-Media/AAPOR-Journals/Standard-Definitions.aspx * Pasek, J. (2010). ANES Weighting Algorithm.  Retrieved from https://web.stanford.edu/group/iriss/cgi-bin/anesrake/resources/RakingDescription.pdf * Targets come from the 2010 Census and 2020 American Community Survey Unweighted Weighted Target*Age 18-3435-5455+Area District 1District 2District 3District 4Hispanic origin No, not Spanish, Hispanic, or LatinoSpanish, Hispanic, or LatinoHousing tenure OwnRentHousing type AttachedDetachedRace & Hispanicorigin Not white aloneWhite alone, not Hispanic or LatinoSexManWomanSex/age Man 18-34Man 35-54Man 55+Woman 18-34Woman 35-54Woman 55+Analyzing the dataResponses from mailed surveys were entered into an electronic dataset using a “key and verify” method, where all responses areentered twice and compared to each other. Any discrepancies were resolved in comparison to the original survey form. Rangechecks as well as other forms of quality control were also performed. Responses from surveys completed on Polco weredownloaded and merged with the mailed survey responses.The demographics of the survey respondents were compared to those found in the 2010 Census and 2020 American CommunitySurvey estimates for adults in the City of Moorpark. The primary objective of weighting survey data is to make the surveyrespondents reflective of the larger population of the community. The characteristics used for weighting were age, sex, race,Hispanic origin, housing type, housing tenure, and area. No adjustments were made for design effects. Weights were calculatedusing an iterative, multiplicative raking model known as the ANES Weighting Algorithm.* The results of the weighting scheme forthe probability sample are presented in the following table.NRC aligns demographic labels with those used by the U.S. Census for reporting purposes, when possible. Some categories (e.g.,age, race/Hispanic origin, housing type, and length of residency) are combined into smaller subgroups.MethodsSelecting survey recipientsAll households within the City of Moorpark were eligible to participate in the survey. A list of all households within the zip codesserving Moorpark was purchased from Go-Dog Direct based on updated listings from the United States Postal Service. Sincesome of the zip codes that serve the City of Moorpark households may also serve addresses that lie outside of the community,the exact geographic location of each housing unit was compared to community boundaries using the most current municipalboundary file. Addresses located outside of the City of Moorpark boundaries were removed from the list of potential householdsto survey. Each address identified as being within city boundaries was further identified as being within one of four districts.From that list, addresses were randomly selected as survey recipients, with multi-family housing units (defined as those with aunit number) sampled at a rate of 53 compared to single family housing units.An individual within each household was selected using the birthday method. The birthday method selects a person within thehousehold by asking the “person whose birthday has most recently passed” to complete the questionnaire. The underlyingassumption in this method is that day of birth has no relationship to the way people respond to surveys. This instruction wascontained in the introduction of the survey. 5 12 Key Findings Upward trends indicate that Moorpark’s economy is on the rise. Many results relating to the economy in Moorpark showed significant growth since 2020, with 61% of residents rating the overall economic health of the city as excellent or good (a 14% increase since 2020). The overall quality of business and service establishments was favorably evaluated by over 6 in 10 participants, on par with the national benchmark. About 4 in 10 residents gave positive reviews to the variety of business and service establishments, increasing by seven percentage points since 2020. Close to 3 in 10 residents positively rated the vibrancy of downtown/commercial areas, a 12-point increase since the 2020 survey results. Employment opportunities (positively rated by 31% of residents) also increased by 15 points since Moorpark’s last iteration of the survey. The cost of living was rated favorably by about 4 in 10 respondents, similar to the national average. When asked what impact, if any, the economy would likely have on their family income in the next six months, only 20% of residents expected the impact to be somewhat or very positive, on par with the national benchmark.   Most residents feel a strong sense of safety in Moorpark. Residents offered high ratings of importance (92% essential or very important) and quality (93% excellent or good) to the overall feeling of safety in Moorpark, suggesting that safety is a priority and a strength for the community. Virtually all residents (about 98%) said they felt very safe or somewhat safe their neighborhood during the day. Close to 9 in 10 residents also felt safe in the city’s downtown/commercial area and from violent crime. About 8 in 10 residents felt safe from property crime and from fire, flood, or other natural disasters. The City’s safety services also received high marks from respondents. A strong majority gave positive reviews to fire services (97%), ambulance or emergency medical services (90%), and police/sheriff services (89%). Roughly 8 in 10 participants did the same for crime prevention, animal control, and fire prevention and education. All safety-related items on the survey were on par with or higher than national benchmark comparisons.   Residents appreciate Moorpark's natural environment and recreational opportunities. Ratings for survey items related to the city's natural environment tended to be positive and on par with or above national averages. About 83% of residents gave excellent or good reviews to the overall quality of natural environment in Moorpark. About 9 in 10 offered positive evaluations of the City's cleanliness, scoring higher than national benchmarks. Additionally, close to 8 in 10 residents favorably rated air quality and yard waste pick up. Results related to parks and recreation were also overwhelmingly positive. About 9 in 10 residents were also pleased with the overall quality of parks and recreation opportunities, while about 8 in 10 favorably rated city parks, recreation programs/classes, and recreation centers/facilities.    In a survey question unique to Moorpark, residents were asked to prioritize funding for different parks and recreation facilities and amenities if additional city funding became available. About 8 in 10 residents rated additional open spaces for passive uses and additional trails and bicycle paths as high or medium priority. Close to 7 in 10 residents rated additional recreation programs and expansion of the recreation center and gym, including a teen center as high or medium priority.   Residents appreciate the City’s health and wellness services and offer input on barriers they face in accessing mental health services. All ratings relating to health and wellness scored on par with comparison communities across the nation. Overall health and wellness opportunities in Moorpark received excellent or good ratings from about three-quarters of respondents. About 7 in 10 were pleased with Moorpark’s health services, while 6 in 10 favorably evaluated the availability of affordable quality health care, the availability of preventive services, and the availability of affordable quality food. In contrast, one-third of residents gave positive reviews to the availability of affordable quality mental health care. In a survey question unique to Moorpark, residents were asked to rate by importance which mental health services Moorpark should aim to attract providers for. About 78% of residents believed that it was essential or very important to attract providers to support suicide prevention. Close to 70% thought it was essential or very important to attract providers who support crisis intervention. When asked particularly about barriers residents face when accessing mental health services, one-quarter rated cost of services as the biggest barrier they face, while 17% of residents felt similarly about limited availability of services. 6 13 Facets of livability Resident perceptions of quality and importance for each of the facets of community livability provide an overview of community strengths and challenges that are useful for planning, budgeting and performance evaluation. The charts below show the proportion of residents who rated the community facets positively for quality and the priority (importance) placed on each. Also displayed is whether local ratings were lower, similar, or higher than communities across the country (the national benchmark). 2016 2018 2020 2022 Overall economic health Overall quality of the transportation system Overall design or layout of residential and commercial areas Overall quality of the utility infrastructure Overall feeling of safety Overall quality of natural environment Overall quality of parks and recreation opportunities Overall health and wellness opportunities Overall opportunities for education, culture, and the arts Residents' connection and engagement with their community 47% 61% Similar47% 61% Similar 60%60% Similar60%60% Similar 69%67% Similar 69%67% Similar 78%72% Similar 78%72% Similar 96%93% Higher 96%93% Higher 89%83% Similar 89%83% Similar 88%91% Similar 88%91% Similar 76%74% Similar 76%74% Similar 62%66% Similar62%66% Similar 66%63% Similar 66%63% Similar Please rate each of the following characteristics as they relate to Moorpark as a whole. (% excellent or good) Overall economic health Overall quality of the transportation system Overall design or layout of residential and commercial areas Overall quality of the utility infrastructure Overall feeling of safety Overall quality of natural environment Overall quality of parks and recreation opportunities Overall health and wellness opportunities Overall opportunities for education, culture, and the arts Residents' connection and engagement with their community Please rate how important, if at all, you think it is for the Moorpark community to focus on each of the following in the coming two years. (% essential or very important) * Comparison to the national benchmark is shown. If no comparison is available, this is left blank. Balancing performance and importance Every jurisdiction must balance limited resources while meeting resident needs and striving to optimize community livability. To this end, it is helpful to know what aspects of the community are most important to residents and which they perceive as being of higher or lower quality. It is especially helpful to know when a facet of livability is considered of high importance but rated as lower quality, as this should be a top priority to address. To help guide City staff and officials with decisions on future resource allocation, resident ratings of the importance of services were compared to their ratings of the quality of these services. To identify the services perceived by residents to have relatively lower quality at the same time as relatively higher importance, all services were ranked from highest perceived quality to lowest perceived quality and from highest perceived importance to lowest perceived importance. Some services were in the top half of both lists (higher quality and higher importance); some were in the top half of one list but the bottom half of the other (higher quality and lower importance or lower quality and higher importance); and some services were in the bottom half of both lists. Services receiving quality ratings of excellent or good by 69% or more of respondents were considered of “higher quality” and those with ratings lower than 69% were considered to be of “lower quality.” Services were classified as “more important” if they were rated as essential or very important by 84% or more of respondents. Services were rated as “less important” if they received a rating of less than 84%. This classification uses the median ratings for quality and importance to divide the services in half. The quadrants in the figure below show which community facets were given higher or lower importance ratings (right-left) and which had higher or lower quality ratings (up-down). Facets of livability falling closer to a diagonal line from the lower left to the upper right are those where performance ratings are more commensurate with resident priorities. Facets scoring  closest to the lower right hand corner of the matrix ( higher in importance and lower in quality) are those that may warrant further investigation to see if changes to their delivery are necessary to improve their performance. This is the key part of this chart on which to focus. Facets falling in the top left hand corner of the chart (lower in importance but higher in quality) are areas where performance may outscore resident priorities, and may be a consideration for lower resource allocation. (vs. benchmark*) 7 14 Facets of livabilityResident perceptions of quality and importance for each of the facets of community livability provide an overview ofcommunity strengths and challenges that are useful for planning, budgeting and performance evaluation.The charts below show the proportion of residents who rated the community facets positively for quality and thepriority (importance) placed on each. Also displayed is whether local ratings were lower, similar, or higher thancommunities across the country (the national benchmark).Overall economic healthOverall quality of the transportation systemOverall design or layout of residential and commercialareasOverall quality of the utility infrastructureOverall feeling of safetyOverall quality of natural environmentOverall quality of parks and recreation opportunitiesOverall health and wellness opportunitiesOverall opportunities for education, culture, and the artsResidents' connection and engagement with theircommunityPlease rate each of the following characteristics as they relate to Moorpark as a whole.(% excellent or good) 2016 2018 2020 2022 Overall economic health Overall quality of the transportation system Overall design or layout of residential and commercial areas Overall quality of the utility infrastructure Overall feeling of safety Overall quality of natural environment Overall quality of parks and recreation opportunities Overall health and wellness opportunities Overall opportunities for education, culture, and the arts Residents' connection and engagement with their community 92%94% Similar 92%94% Similar 64%69% Similar64%69% Similar 76%85% Similar76%85% Similar 80%87% Similar80%87% Similar 91%92% Similar 91%92% Similar 85%89% Similar 85%89% Similar 80%83% Similar80%83% Similar 76%75% Similar76%75% Similar 71%73% Similar71%73% Similar 71%70% Similar 71%70% Similar Please rate how important, if at all, you think it is for the Moorpark community to focus on each of the following in the coming two years. (% essential or very important) * Comparison to the national benchmark is shown. If no comparison is available, this is left blank. Balancing performance and importance Every jurisdiction must balance limited resources while meeting resident needs and striving to optimize community livability. To this end, it is helpful to know what aspects of the community are most important to residents and which they perceive as being of higher or lower quality. It is especially helpful to know when a facet of livability is considered of high importance but rated as lower quality, as this should be a top priority to address. To help guide City staff and officials with decisions on future resource allocation, resident ratings of the importance of services were compared to their ratings of the quality of these services. To identify the services perceived by residents to have relatively lower quality at the same time as relatively higher importance, all services were ranked from highest perceived quality to lowest perceived quality and from highest perceived importance to lowest perceived importance. Some services were in the top half of both lists (higher quality and higher importance); some were in the top half of one list but the bottom half of the other (higher quality and lower importance or lower quality and higher importance); and some services were in the bottom half of both lists. Services receiving quality ratings of excellent or good by 69% or more of respondents were considered of “higher quality” and those with ratings lower than 69% were considered to be of “lower quality.” Services were classified as “more important” if they were rated as essential or very important by 84% or more of respondents. Services were rated as “less important” if they received a rating of less than 84%. This classification uses the median ratings for quality and importance to divide the services in half. The quadrants in the figure below show which community facets were given higher or lower importance ratings (right-left) and which had higher or lower quality ratings (up-down). Facets of livability falling closer to a diagonal line from the lower left to the upper right are those where performance ratings are more commensurate with resident priorities. Facets scoring  closest to the lower right hand corner of the matrix ( higher in importance and lower in quality) are those that may warrant further investigation to see if changes to their delivery are necessary to improve their performance. This is the key part of this chart on which to focus. Facets falling in the top left hand corner of the chart (lower in importance but higher in quality) are areas where performance may outscore resident priorities, and may be a consideration for lower resource allocation. (vs. benchmark*) 8 15 Facets of livabilityResident perceptions of quality and importance for each of the facets of community livability provide an overview ofcommunity strengths and challenges that are useful for planning, budgeting and performance evaluation.The charts below show the proportion of residents who rated the community facets positively for quality and thepriority (importance) placed on each. Also displayed is whether local ratings were lower, similar, or higher thancommunities across the country (the national benchmark).Overall economic healthOverall quality of the transportation systemOverall design or layout of residential and commercialareasOverall quality of the utility infrastructureOverall feeling of safetyOverall quality of natural environmentOverall quality of parks and recreation opportunitiesOverall health and wellness opportunitiesOverall opportunities for education, culture, and the artsResidents' connection and engagement with theircommunityPlease rate each of the following characteristics as they relate to Moorpark as a whole.(% excellent or good)Overall economic healthOverall quality of the transportation systemOverall design or layout of residential and commercialareasOverall quality of the utility infrastructureOverall feeling of safetyOverall quality of natural environmentOverall quality of parks and recreation opportunitiesOverall health and wellness opportunitiesOverall opportunities for education, culture, and the artsResidents' connection and engagement with theircommunityPlease rate how important, if at all, you think it is for the Moorpark community to focus on each of the following inthe coming two years.(% essential or very important)* Comparison to the national benchmark is shown. If no comparison is available, this is left blank. Balancing performance and importance Every jurisdiction must balance limited resources while meeting resident needs and striving to optimize community livability. To this end, it is helpful to know what aspects of the community are most important to residents and which they perceive as being of higher or lower quality. It is especially helpful to know when a facet of livability is considered of high importance but rated as lower quality, as this should be a top priority to address. To help guide City staff and officials with decisions on future resource allocation, resident ratings of the importance of services were compared to their ratings of the quality of these services. To identify the services perceived by residents to have relatively lower quality at the same time as relatively higher importance, all services were ranked from highest perceived quality to lowest perceived quality and from highest perceived importance to lowest perceived importance. Some services were in the top half of both lists (higher quality and higher importance); some were in the top half of one list but the bottom half of the other (higher quality and lower importance or lower quality and higher importance); and some services were in the bottom half of both lists. Services receiving quality ratings of excellent or good by 69% or more of respondents were considered of “higher quality” and those with ratings lower than 69% were considered to be of “lower quality.” Services were classified as “more important” if they were rated as essential or very important by 84% or more of respondents. Services were rated as “less important” if they received a rating of less than 84%. This classification uses the median ratings for quality and importance to divide the services in half. The quadrants in the figure below show which community facets were given higher or lower importance ratings (right-left) and which had higher or lower quality ratings (up-down). Facets of livability falling closer to a diagonal line from the lower left to the upper right are those where performance ratings are more commensurate with resident priorities. Facets scoring  closest to the lower right hand corner of the matrix ( higher in importance and lower in quality) are those that may warrant further investigation to see if changes to their delivery are necessary to improve their performance. This is the key part of this chart on which to focus. Facets falling in the top left hand corner of the chart (lower in importance but higher in quality) are areas where performance may outscore resident priorities, and may be a consideration for lower resource allocation. 70%80%90% Importance 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Qu a l i t y Community design Economy Education, arts, and culture Health and wellness Inclusivity and engagement Mobility Natural environment Parks and recreation Safety UtilitiesMedian Median (vs. benchmark*) 9 16 Excellent 40%Good 52% Poor 1% Fair 8% The overall quality of life in Moorpark, 2022 Quality of life Measuring community livability starts with assessing the quality of life of those who live there, and ensuring that the community is attractive, accessible, and welcoming to all. 2016 2018 2020 2022 Moorpark as a place to live The overall quality of life 92%95% Similar vs. benchmark* 92%95% Similar vs. benchmark* 88%92% Similar 88%92% Similar Please rate each of the following aspects of quality of life in Moorpark. (% excellent or good) 2016 2018 2020 2022 Recommend living in Moorpark to someone who asks Remain in Moorpark for the next five years 95%93% Similar 95%93% Similar 87%92% Similar 87%92% Similar Please indicate how likely or unlikely you are to do each of the following. (% very or somewhat likely) 2016 2018 2020 2022 Overall image or reputation 76%81% Similar 76%81% Similar Please rate each of the following in the Moorpark community. (% excellent or good) * Comparison to the national benchmark is shown. If no comparison is available, this is left blank. 10 17 Excellent 10% Good 45% Fair 34% Poor 11% Overall confidence in Moorpark government, 2022 Governance Strong local governments produce results that meet the needs of residents while making the best use of available resources, and are responsive to the present and future needs of the community as a whole. * Comparison to the national benchmark is shown. If no comparison is available, this is left blank. 2016 2018 2020 2022 The value of services for the taxes paid to Moorpark The overall direction that Moorpark is taking The job Moorpark government does at welcoming resident involvement Overall confidence in Moorpark government Generally acting in the best interest of the community Being honest Being open and transparent to the public Informing residents about issues facing the community Treating all residents fairly Treating residents with respect 60%63% Similar60%63% Similar 53%58% Similar53%58% Similar 51%53% Similar51%53% Similar 52%55% Similar52%55% Similar 60%58% Similar 60%58% Similar 71%64% Similar 71%64% Similar Please rate the following categories of Moorpark government performance. (% excellent or good) 2016 2018 2020 2022 Public information services Overall customer service by Moorpark employees 72%62% Similar 72%62% Similar 89%85% Similar vs. benchmark* 89%85% Similar vs. benchmark* Please rate the quality of each of the following services in Moorpark. (% excellent or good) The City of Moorpark The Federal Government Overall, how would you rate the quality of the services provided by each of the following? (% excellent or good) 11 18 Overall confidence in Moorparkgovernment, 2022GovernanceStrong local governments produce results that meet the needsof residents while making the best use of available resources,and are responsive to the present and future needs of thecommunity as a whole. * Comparison to the national benchmark is shown. If no comparison is available, this is left blank. The value of services for the taxes paid to MoorparkThe overall direction that Moorpark is takingThe job Moorpark government does at welcoming residentinvolvementOverall confidence in Moorpark governmentGenerally acting in the best interest of the community Being honest Being open and transparent to the public Informing residents about issues facing the community Treating all residents fairly Treating residents with respect 71%64% Similar 71%64% Similar 61%57% Similar 61%57% Similar 55%47% Similar 55%47% Similar 72%63% Similar 72%63% Similar 77%67% Similar 77%67% Similar Please rate the following categories of Moorpark government performance.(% excellent or good)Public information servicesOverall customer service by Moorpark employeesPlease rate the quality of each of the following services in Moorpark.(% excellent or good) 2016 2018 2020 2022 The City of Moorpark The Federal Government 76%72% Similar 76%72% Similar 41%39% Similar 41%39% Similar Overall, how would you rate the quality of the services provided by each of the following? (% excellent or good) 12 19 Excellent 9% Good 52% Fair 34% Poor 5% Overall economic health of Moorpark, 2022 Very positive Somewhat positive Neutral Somewhat negative Very negative 7% 14% 36% 32% 11% What impact, if any, do you think the economy will have on your family income in the next 6 months? Do you think the impact will be: Economy Local governments work together with private and nonprofit businesses, and with the community at large, to foster sustainable growth, create jobs, and promote a thriving local economy. 2016 2018 2020 2022 Moorpark as a place to work Moorpark as a place to visit 49%49% Lower 49%49% Lower 40%45% Lower40%45% Lower Please rate each of the following aspects of quality of life in Moorpark. (% excellent or good) 2016 2018 2020 2022 Overall quality of business and service establishments Variety of business and service establishments Vibrancy of downtown/commercial area Employment opportunities Shopping opportunities Cost of living 57%62% Similar 57%62% Similar 35% 42% Similar35% 42% Similar 17% 29% Lower17% 29% Lower Please rate each of the following in the Moorpark community. (% excellent or good) Economic development Please rate the quality of each of the following services in Moorpark. (% excellent or good) What impact, if any, do you think the economy will have on your family income in the next 6 months? Do you think the impact will be: What impact, if any, do you think the economy will have on your family income in the next 6 months? Do you think the impact will be: (% very or somewhat positive) 2016 2018 2020 2022 Overall economic health 47% 61% Similar vs. benchmark* 47% 61% Similar vs. benchmark* Please rate each of the following characteristics as they relate to Moorpark as a whole. (% excellent or good) * Comparison to the national benchmark is shown. If no comparison is available, this is left blank. 13 20 Overall economic health ofMoorpark, 2022 Very positiveSomewhatpositiveNeutralSomewhatnegativeVery negativeWhat impact, if any, do you think the economywill have on your family income in the next 6months? Do you think the impact will be:EconomyLocal governments work together with private andnonprofit businesses, and with the community atlarge, to foster sustainable growth, create jobs,and promote a thriving local economy.Moorpark as a place to workMoorpark as a place to visitPlease rate each of the following aspects of quality of life in Moorpark.(% excellent or good)Overall quality of business and service establishmentsVariety of business and service establishmentsVibrancy of downtown/commercial area Employment opportunities Shopping opportunities Cost of living 16% 31% Similar16% 31% Similar 31% 38% Similar31% 38% Similar 39%38% Similar39%38% Similar Please rate each of the following in the Moorpark community.(% excellent or good) 2016 2018 2020 2022 Economic development 34%38% Similar 34%38% Similar Please rate the quality of each of the following services in Moorpark. (% excellent or good) 2016 2018 2020 2022 What impact, if any, do you think the economy will have on your family income in the next 6 months? Do you think the impact will be: 21%20% Similar 21%20% Similar What impact, if any, do you think the economy will have on your family income in the next 6 months? Do you think the impact will be: (% very or somewhat positive) Overall economic healthPlease rate each of the following characteristics as they relate to Moorpark as a whole.(% excellent or good) * Comparison to the national benchmark is shown. If no comparison is available, this is left blank. 14 21 Excellent 12% Good 48% Fair 30% Poor 10% Overall quality of the transportation system in Moorpark, 2022 Mobility The ease with which residents can move about their communities, whether for commuting, leisure, or recreation, plays a major role in the quality of life for all who live, work, and play in the community. * Comparison to the national benchmark is shown. If no comparison is available, this is left blank. 2016 2018 2020 2022 Traffic flow on major streets Ease of public parking Ease of travel by car Ease of travel by public transportation Ease of travel by bicycle Ease of walking 42%42% Similar42%42% Similar 81%76% Higher 81%76% Higher 74%73% Similar 74%73% Similar 52%49% Higher 52%49% Higher 66%60% Similar 66%60% Similar 79%73% Similar 79%73% Similar Please also rate each of the following in the Moorpark community. (% excellent or good) Used public transportation instead of driving Carpooled with other adults or children instead of driving alone Walked or biked instead of driving Please indicate whether or not you have done each of the following in the last 12 months. (% yes) Traffic enforcement Traffic signal timing Street repair Street cleaning Street lighting Sidewalk maintenance Bus or transit services Please rate the quality of each of the following services in Moorpark. (% excellent or good) 2016 2018 2020 2022 Overall quality of the transportation system 60%60% Similar vs. benchmark* 60%60% Similar vs. benchmark* Please rate each of the following characteristics as they relate to Moorpark as a whole. (% excellent or good) 15 22 Overall quality of the transportationsystem in Moorpark, 2022MobilityThe ease with which residents can move about theircommunities, whether for commuting, leisure, or recreation,plays a major role in the quality of life for all who live, work,and play in the community. * Comparison to the national benchmark is shown. If no comparison is available, this is left blank. Traffic flow on major streetsEase of public parkingEase of travel by carEase of travel by public transportationEase of travel by bicycleEase of walkingPlease also rate each of the following in the Moorpark community.(% excellent or good) 2016 2018 2020 2022 Used public transportation instead of driving Carpooled with other adults or children instead of driving alone Walked or biked instead of driving 17%16% Similar 17%16% Similar 46%44% Similar 46%44% Similar 63%60% Similar 63%60% Similar Please indicate whether or not you have done each of the following in the last 12 months. (% yes) 2016 2018 2020 2022 Traffic enforcement Traffic signal timing Street repair Street cleaning Street lighting Sidewalk maintenance Bus or transit services 70%62% Similar 70%62% Similar 61%58% Similar 61%58% Similar 53%49% Similar 53%49% Similar 80%83% Higher 80%83% Higher 80%72% Similar 80%72% Similar 69%65% Similar 69%65% Similar 61%64% Higher61%64% Higher Please rate the quality of each of the following services in Moorpark. (% excellent or good) Overall quality of the transportation systemPlease rate each of the following characteristics as they relate to Moorpark as a whole.(% excellent or good) 16 23 Excellent 17% Good 50% Fair 27% Poor 7% Overall design or layout of Moorpark's residential and commercial areas, 2022 Community design A well-designed community enhances the quality of life for its residents by encouraging smart land use and zoning, ensuring that affordable housing is accessible to all, and providing access to parks and other green spaces. * Comparison to the national benchmark is shown. If no comparison is available, this is left blank. 2016 2018 2020 2022 Well-planned residential growth Well-planned commercial growth Well-designed neighborhoods Preservation of the historical or cultural character of the community Public places where people want to spend time Variety of housing options Availability of affordable quality housing Overall quality of new development Overall appearance 57%57% Similar57%57% Similar 26% 37% Similar26% 37% Similar 77%71% Similar 77%71% Similar 51% 57% Similar51% 57% Similar Please also rate each of the following in the Moorpark community. (% excellent or good) 2016 2018 2020 2022 Your neighborhood as a place to live 93%93% Similar 93%93% Similar Please rate each of the following aspects of quality of life in Moorpark. (% excellent or good) Land use, planning and zoning Code enforcement Please rate the quality of each of the following services in Moorpark. (% excellent or good) 2016 2018 2020 2022 Overall design or layout of residential and commercial areas 69%67% Similar vs. benchmark* 69%67% Similar vs. benchmark* Please rate each of the following characteristics as they relate to Moorpark as a whole. (% excellent or good) 17 24 Overall design or layout ofMoorpark's residential andcommercial areas, 2022Community designA well-designed community enhances the quality of life for itsresidents by encouraging smart land use and zoning, ensuringthat affordable housing is accessible to all, and providingaccess to parks and other green spaces. * Comparison to the national benchmark is shown. If no comparison is available, this is left blank. Well-planned residential growthWell-planned commercial growthWell-designed neighborhoodsPreservation of the historical or cultural character of thecommunity Public places where people want to spend time Variety of housing options Availability of affordable quality housing Overall quality of new development Overall appearance 46%45% Similar 46%45% Similar 55%45% Similar 55%45% Similar 30%31% Similar30%31% Similar 53%48% Similar 53%48% Similar 77%77% Similar 77%77% Similar Please also rate each of the following in the Moorpark community.(% excellent or good)Your neighborhood as a place to livePlease rate each of the following aspects of quality of life in Moorpark.(% excellent or good) 2016 2018 2020 2022 Land use, planning and zoning Code enforcement 52%50% Similar 52%50% Similar 52%47% Similar 52%47% Similar Please rate the quality of each of the following services in Moorpark. (% excellent or good) Overall design or layout of residential and commercialareasPlease rate each of the following characteristics as they relate to Moorpark as a whole.(% excellent or good) 18 25 Excellent 20% Good 52% Fair 24% Poor 4% Overall quality of the utility infrastructure in Moorpark, 2022 Utilities Services such as water, gas, electricity, and internet access play a vital role in ensuring the physical and economic health and well-being of the communities they serve. * Comparison to the national benchmark is shown. If no comparison is available, this is left blank. 2016 2018 2020 2022 Affordable high-speed internet access Garbage collection Drinking water Sewer services Storm water management Power (electric and/or gas) utility Utility billing 65%52% Similar 65%52% Similar 88%87% Similar 88%87% Similar 84%78% Similar 84%78% Similar 88%87% Similar 88%87% Similar 82%80% Similar 82%80% Similar 82%63% Lower 82%63% Lower Please rate the quality of each of the following services in Moorpark. (% excellent or good) 2016 2018 2020 2022 Overall quality of the utility infrastructure 78%72% Similar vs. benchmark* 78%72% Similar vs. benchmark* Please rate each of the following characteristics as they relate to Moorpark as a whole. (% excellent or good) 19 26 Overall quality of the utilityinfrastructure in Moorpark, 2022UtilitiesServices such as water, gas, electricity, and internet accessplay a vital role in ensuring the physical and economic healthand well-being of the communities they serve. * Comparison to the national benchmark is shown. If no comparison is available, this is left blank. Affordable high-speed internet accessGarbage collectionDrinking waterSewer servicesStorm water managementPower (electric and/or gas) utility Utility billing 78%59% Similar 78%59% Similar Please rate the quality of each of the following services in Moorpark.(% excellent or good)Overall quality of the utility infrastructurePlease rate each of the following characteristics as they relate to Moorpark as a whole.(% excellent or good) 20 27 Excellent 48% Good 45% Fair 6% Poor 1% Overall feeling of safety in Moorpark, 2022 Safety Public safety is often the most important task facing local governments. All residents should feel safe and secure in their neighborhoods and in the greater community, and providing robust safety-related services is essential to residents' quality of life. 2016 2018 2020 2022 Overall feeling of safety 96%93% Higher vs. benchmark* 96%93% Higher vs. benchmark* Please rate each of the following characteristics as they relate to Moorpark as a whole. (% excellent or good) 2016 2018 2020 2022 In your neighborhood during the day In Moorpark's downtown/commercial area during the day From property crime From violent crime From fire, flood, or other natural disaster 98%98% Similar 98%98% Similar 95%94% Similar 95%94% Similar 84%84% Similar84%84% Similar 91%90% Similar 91%90% Similar 71%77% Similar71%77% Similar Please rate how safe or unsafe you feel: (% very or somewhat safe) Police/Sheriff services Crime prevention Animal control Ambulance or emergency medical services Fire services Fire prevention and education Emergency preparedness Please rate the quality of each of the following services in Moorpark. (% excellent or good) * Comparison to the national benchmark is shown. If no comparison is available, this is left blank. 21 28 Overall feeling of safety inMoorpark, 2022SafetyPublic safety is often the most important task facing localgovernments. All residents should feel safe and secure in theirneighborhoods and in the greater community, and providingrobust safety-related services is essential to residents' qualityof life.Overall feeling of safetyPlease rate each of the following characteristics as they relate to Moorpark as a whole.(% excellent or good)In your neighborhood during the dayIn Moorpark's downtown/commercial area during the dayFrom property crimeFrom violent crimeFrom fire, flood, or other natural disasterPlease rate how safe or unsafe you feel:(% very or somewhat safe) 2016 2018 2020 2022 Police/Sheriff services Crime prevention Animal control Ambulance or emergency medical services Fire services Fire prevention and education Emergency preparedness 91%89% Similar 91%89% Similar 89%83% Higher 89%83% Higher 86%80% Similar 86%80% Similar 94%90% Similar 94%90% Similar 90%97% Similar 90%97% Similar 77%82% Similar77%82% Similar 67%68% Similar67%68% Similar Please rate the quality of each of the following services in Moorpark. (% excellent or good) * Comparison to the national benchmark is shown. If no comparison is available, this is left blank. 22 29 Excellent 36% Good 47% Fair 13% Poor 4% Overall quality of natural environment in Moorpark, 2022 Natural environment The natural environment plays a vital role in the health and well-being of residents. The natural spaces in which residents live and experience their communities has a direct and profound effect on quality of life. 2016 2018 2020 2022 Cleanliness Water resources Air quality 86%86% Higher 86%86% Higher 32% 28% Much lower 32% 28% Much lower 86%79% Similar 86%79% Similar Please also rate each of the following in the Moorpark community. (% excellent or good) 2016 2018 2020 2022 Preservation of natural areas Moorpark open space Recycling Yard waste pick-up 76%69% Similar 76%69% Similar 74%69% Similar 74%69% Similar Please rate the quality of each of the following services in Moorpark. (% excellent or good) 2016 2018 2020 2022 Overall quality of natural environment 89%83% Similar vs. benchmark* 89%83% Similar vs. benchmark* Please rate each of the following characteristics as they relate to Moorpark as a whole. (% excellent or good) * Comparison to the national benchmark is shown. If no comparison is available, this is left blank. 23 30 Overall quality of naturalenvironment in Moorpark, 2022Natural environmentThe natural environment plays a vital role in the health andwell-being of residents. The natural spaces in which residentslive and experience their communities has a direct andprofound effect on quality of life.CleanlinessWater resourcesAir qualityPlease also rate each of the following in the Moorpark community.(% excellent or good)Preservation of natural areas Moorpark open space Recycling Yard waste pick-up 73%69% Similar 73%69% Similar 88%82% Similar 88%82% Similar Please rate the quality of each of the following services in Moorpark.(% excellent or good)Overall quality of natural environmentPlease rate each of the following characteristics as they relate to Moorpark as a whole.(% excellent or good) * Comparison to the national benchmark is shown. If no comparison is available, this is left blank. 24 31 Excellent 45% Good 45% Fair 8% Poor 1% Overall quality of parks and recreation opportunities, 2022 Parks and recreation "There are no communities that pride themselves on their quality of life, promote themselves as a desirable location for businesses to relocate, or maintain that they are environmental stewards of their natural resources, without such communities having a robust, active system of parks and recreation programs for public use and enjoyment." - National Recreation and Park Association 2016 2018 2020 2022 Availability of paths and walking trails Fitness opportunities Recreational opportunities 75%65% Similar 75%65% Similar 70%64% Similar 70%64% Similar 69%64% Similar 69%64% Similar Please also rate each of the following in the Moorpark community. (% excellent or good) 2016 2018 2020 2022 City parks Recreation programs or classes Recreation centers or facilities 84%84% Similar 84%84% Similar 82%78% Similar 82%78% Similar Please rate the quality of each of the following services in Moorpark. (% excellent or good) 2016 2018 2020 2022 Overall quality of parks and recreation opportunities 88%91% Similar vs. benchmark* 88%91% Similar vs. benchmark* Please rate each of the following characteristics as they relate to Moorpark as a whole. (% excellent or good) * Comparison to the national benchmark is shown. If no comparison is available, this is left blank. 25 32 Overall quality of parks andrecreation opportunities, 2022Parks and recreation"There are no communities that pride themselves on theirquality of life, promote themselves as a desirable location forbusinesses to relocate, or maintain that they areenvironmental stewards of their natural resources, withoutsuch communities having a robust, active system of parks andrecreation programs for public use and enjoyment."- National Recreation and Park AssociationAvailability of paths and walking trailsFitness opportunitiesRecreational opportunitiesPlease also rate each of the following in the Moorpark community.(% excellent or good)City parks Recreation programs or classes Recreation centers or facilities 75%76% Similar 75%76% Similar Please rate the quality of each of the following services in Moorpark.(% excellent or good)Overall quality of parks and recreation opportunitiesPlease rate each of the following characteristics as they relate to Moorpark as a whole.(% excellent or good) * Comparison to the national benchmark is shown. If no comparison is available, this is left blank. 26 33 Excellent 23% Good 51% Fair 22% Poor 4% Overall health and wellness opportunities in Moorpark, 2022 Health and wellness The characteristics of and amenities available in the communities in which people live has a direct impact on the health and wellness of residents, and thus, on their quality of life overall. 2016 2018 2020 2022 Availability of affordable quality food Availability of affordable quality health care Availability of preventive health services Availability of affordable quality mental health care 64%59% Similar 64%59% Similar 59%60% Similar 59%60% Similar 53%55% Similar53%55% Similar 30%34% Similar30%34% Similar Please also rate each of the following in the Moorpark community. (% excellent or good) 2016 2018 2020 2022 Health services 73%67% Similar 73%67% Similar Please rate the quality of each of the following services in Moorpark. (% excellent or good) Please rate your overall health. Please rate your overall health. (% excellent or very good) 2016 2018 2020 2022 Overall health and wellness opportunities 76%74% Similar vs. benchmark* 76%74% Similar vs. benchmark* Please rate each of the following characteristics as they relate to Moorpark as a whole. (% excellent or good) * Comparison to the national benchmark is shown. If no comparison is available, this is left blank. 27 34 Overall health and wellnessopportunities in Moorpark, 2022Health and wellnessThe characteristics of and amenities available in thecommunities in which people live has a direct impact on thehealth and wellness of residents, and thus, on their quality oflife overall.Availability of affordable quality foodAvailability of affordable quality health careAvailability of preventive health servicesAvailability of affordable quality mental health carePlease also rate each of the following in the Moorpark community.(% excellent or good)Health servicesPlease rate the quality of each of the following services in Moorpark.(% excellent or good) 2016 2018 2020 2022 Please rate your overall health. 80%72% Similar 80%72% Similar Please rate your overall health. (% excellent or very good) Overall health and wellness opportunitiesPlease rate each of the following characteristics as they relate to Moorpark as a whole.(% excellent or good) * Comparison to the national benchmark is shown. If no comparison is available, this is left blank. 28 35 Excellent 18% Good 48% Fair 28% Poor 6% Overall opportunities for education, culture and the arts, 2022 Education, arts, and culture Participation in the arts, in educational opportunities, and in cultural activities is linked to increased civic engagement, greater social tolerance, and enhanced enjoyment of the local community. 2016 2018 2020 2022 Opportunities to attend cultural/arts/music activities Community support for the arts Availability of affordable quality childcare/preschool K-12 education Adult educational opportunities Opportunities to attend special events and festivals 32% 41% Similar32% 41% Similar 38% 45% Similar38% 45% Similar 41% 53% Similar41% 53% Similar 84%82% Similar 84%82% Similar 52%58% Similar52%58% Similar 53% 62% Similar53% 62% Similar Please also rate each of the following in the Moorpark community. (% excellent or good) Public library services Please rate the quality of each of the following services in Moorpark. (% excellent or good) 2016 2018 2020 2022 Overall opportunities for education, culture, and the arts 62%66% Similar vs. benchmark* 62%66% Similar vs. benchmark* Please rate each of the following characteristics as they relate to Moorpark as a whole. (% excellent or good) * Comparison to the national benchmark is shown. If no comparison is available, this is left blank. 29 36 Overall opportunities for education,culture and the arts, 2022Education, arts, and cultureParticipation in the arts, in educational opportunities, and incultural activities is linked to increased civic engagement,greater social tolerance, and enhanced enjoyment of the localcommunity.Opportunities to attend cultural/arts/music activitiesCommunity support for the artsAvailability of affordable quality childcare/preschoolK-12 educationAdult educational opportunitiesOpportunities to attend special events and festivalsPlease also rate each of the following in the Moorpark community.(% excellent or good) 2016 2018 2020 2022 Public library services 80%74% Similar 80%74% Similar Please rate the quality of each of the following services in Moorpark. (% excellent or good) Overall opportunities for education, culture, and the artsPlease rate each of the following characteristics as they relate to Moorpark as a whole.(% excellent or good) * Comparison to the national benchmark is shown. If no comparison is available, this is left blank. 30 37 Excellent 16% Good 48% Fair 29% Poor 7% Residents' connection and engagement with their community, 2022 Inclusivity and engagement Inclusivity refers to a cultural and environmental feeling of belonging; residents who feel invited to participate within their communities feel more included, involved, and engaged than those who do not. 2016 2018 2020 2022 Moorpark as a place to raise children Moorpark as a place to retire Sense of community 96%95% Higher 96%95% Higher 70%76% Similar70%76% Similar 79%77% Similar 79%77% Similar Please rate each of the following aspects of quality of life in Moorpark. (% excellent or good) 2016 2018 2020 2022 Residents' connection and engagement with their community 66%63% Similar vs. benchmark* 66%63% Similar vs. benchmark* Please rate each of the following characteristics as they relate to Moorpark as a whole. (% excellent or good) 2016 2018 2020 2022 Making all residents feel welcome Attracting people from diverse backgrounds Valuing/respecting residents from diverse backgrounds Taking care of vulnerable residents 78%80% Similar 78%80% Similar Please rate the job you feel the Moorpark community does at each of the following. (% excellent or good) Sense of civic/community pride Neighborliness of residents Opportunities to participate in social events and activities Opportunities to volunteer Opportunities to participate in community matters Openness and acceptance of the community toward people of diverse backgrounds Please also rate each of the following in the Moorpark community. (% excellent or good) * Comparison to the national benchmark is shown. If no comparison is available, this is left blank. 31 38 Residents' connection andengagement with theircommunity, 2022Inclusivity and engagementInclusivity refers to a cultural and environmental feeling ofbelonging; residents who feel invited to participate within theircommunities feel more included, involved, and engaged thanthose who do not.Moorpark as a place to raise childrenMoorpark as a place to retireSense of communityPlease rate each of the following aspects of quality of life in Moorpark.(% excellent or good)Residents' connection and engagement with theircommunityPlease rate each of the following characteristics as they relate to Moorpark as a whole.(% excellent or good) Making all residents feel welcome Attracting people from diverse backgrounds Valuing/respecting residents from diverse backgrounds Taking care of vulnerable residents 69%66% Similar 69%66% Similar 78%74% Similar 78%74% Similar 67%68% Higher67%68% Higher Please rate the job you feel the Moorpark community does at each of the following.(% excellent or good) 2016 2018 2020 2022 Sense of civic/community pride Neighborliness of residents Opportunities to participate in social events and activities Opportunities to volunteer Opportunities to participate in community matters Openness and acceptance of the community toward people of diverse backgrounds 71%69% Similar 71%69% Similar 76%73% Similar 76%73% Similar 54% 61% Similar54% 61% Similar 58%63% Similar58%63% Similar 59%57% Similar 59%57% Similar 65%61% Similar 65%61% Similar Please also rate each of the following in the Moorpark community. (% excellent or good) * Comparison to the national benchmark is shown. If no comparison is available, this is left blank. 32 39 Residents' participation levels 2016 2018 2020 2022 Contacted the City of Moorpark for help or information Contacted Moorpark elected officials to express your opinion Attended a local public meeting Watched a local public meeting Volunteered your time to some group/activity Campaigned or advocated for a local issue, cause, or candidate Voted in your most recent local election 34% 35% Lower vs. benchmark* 34% 35% Lower vs. benchmark* 15%13% Similar15%13% Similar 22%17% Similar 22%17% Similar 27%18% Similar 27%18% Similar 26%31% Similar26%31% Similar 21%17% Similar 21%17% Similar 92%82% Similar 92%82% Similar Please indicate whether or not you have done each of the following in the last 12 months. (% yes) 2016 2018 2020 2022 Access the internet from your home Access the internet from your cell phone Visit social media sites Use or check email Share your opinions online Shop online 97%98% Similar 97%98% Similar 96%97% Similar 96%97% Similar In general, how many times do you: (% a few times a week or more) * Comparison to the national benchmark is shown. If no comparison is available, this is left blank. 33 40 Residents' participation levelsContacted the City of Moorpark for help or informationContacted Moorpark elected officials to express your opinionAttended a local public meetingWatched a local public meetingVolunteered your time to some group/activityCampaigned or advocated for a local issue, cause, or candidateVoted in your most recent local electionPlease indicate whether or not you have done each of the following in the last 12 months.(% yes)Access the internet from your home Access the internet from your cell phone Visit social media sites Use or check email Share your opinions online Shop online 96%97% Similar 96%97% Similar 83%80% Similar 83%80% Similar 99%98% Similar 99%98% Similar 39%28% Similar 39%28% Similar 71%68% Higher 71%68% Higher In general, how many times do you:(% a few times a week or more) * Comparison to the national benchmark is shown. If no comparison is available, this is left blank. 34 41 Please rate how much of a priority, if at all, you think it is for Moorpark to invest in the following parks and recreation facilities and amenities if additional city funding is available. Community pool High priority Medium priority Low priority Not a priority Splash pads High priority Medium priority Low priority Not a priority Disc golf course High priority Medium priority Low priority Not a priority Additional dog parks High priority Medium priority Low priority Not a priority Additional open spaces for passive uses (hiking, etc.) High priority Medium priority Low priority Not a priority Additional trails and bicycle paths High priority Medium priority Low priority Not a priority Additional soccer/multi-use fields High priority Medium priority Low priority Not a priority Additional baseball/softball fields High priority Medium priority Low priority Not a priority Additional sports field lighting High priority Medium priority Low priority Not a priority Additional pickleball courts High priority Medium priority Low priority Not a priority Sand volleyball courts High priority Medium priority Low priority Not a priority Expansion of the recreation center & gym, including a teen center High priority Medium priority Low priority Not a priority Additional recreation programs High priority Medium priority Low priority Not a priority Please rate how important, if at all, you think it is for Moorpark to attract providers of each of the following mental health services. Psychiatric services Essential Very important Somewhat important Not at all important Psychological testing Essential Very important Somewhat important Not at all important Individual or group therapy Essential Very important Somewhat important Not at all important Crisis intervention Essential Very important Somewhat important Not at all important Suicide prevention Essential Very important Somewhat important Not at all important Medication services Essential Very important Somewhat important Not at all important Rehabilitation services Essential Very important Somewhat important Not at all important Case management services Essential Very important Somewhat important Not at all important Please indicate which of the following, if any, you believe is the single biggest barrier to accessing mental health services in Moorpark. (Select only one option.) Cost of services Insurance coverage Limited availability of s.. Lack of information Social/societal stigma Quality of services Hours of operation Proximity to the city Lack of transportation t.. Language barriers Other unlisted barrier None of these/Don't kn.. 19% 28% 25% 28% 20% 35% 23% 21% 36% 37% 19% 8% 21% 31% 35% 13% 3% 16% 37% 43% 3% 17% 42% 38% 17% 42% 32% 9% Custom questions Below are the complete set of responses to each custom question on the survey. By default, “don’t know” responses are excluded, but may be added to the table using the response filter below. % positive Include "don't know" No 35 42 Please rate how much of apriority, if at all, you think it is forMoorpark to invest in thefollowing parks and recreationfacilities and amenities ifadditional city funding isavailable.Community pool High priorityMedium priorityLow priorityNot a prioritySplash pads High priorityMedium priorityLow priorityNot a priorityDisc golf course High priorityMedium priorityLow priorityNot a priorityAdditional dog parks High priorityMedium priorityLow priorityNot a priorityAdditional open spaces for passive uses(hiking, etc.)High priorityMedium priorityLow priorityNot a priorityAdditional trails and bicycle paths High priorityMedium priorityLow priorityNot a priority Additional soccer/multi-use fields Low priority Not a priority Additional baseball/softball fields High priority Medium priority Low priority Not a priority Additional sports field lighting High priority Medium priority Low priority Not a priority Additional pickleball courts High priority Medium priority Low priority Not a priority Sand volleyball courts High priority Medium priority Low priority Not a priority Expansion of the recreation center & gym, including a teen center High priority Medium priority Low priority Not a priority Additional recreation programs High priority Medium priority Low priority Not a priority Please rate how important, if at all, you think it is for Moorpark to attract providers of each of the following mental health services. Psychiatric services Essential Very important Somewhat important Not at all important Psychological testing Essential Very important Not at all important Individual or group therapy Essential Very important Somewhat important Not at all important Crisis intervention Essential Very important Somewhat important Not at all important Suicide prevention Essential Very important Somewhat important Not at all important Medication services Essential Very important Somewhat important Not at all important Rehabilitation services Essential Very important Somewhat important Not at all important Case management services Essential Very important Somewhat important Not at all important Please indicate which of the following, if any, you believe is the single biggest barrier to accessing mental health services in Moorpark. (Select only one option.) Cost of services Insurance coverage Limited availability of s.. Lack of information Social/societal stigma Quality of services Hours of operation Proximity to the city Lack of transportation t.. Language barriers Other unlisted barrier None of these/Don't kn.. 17% 42% 32% 9% 19% 44% 29% 8% 15% 31% 35% 19% 28% 37% 23% 11% 30% 41% 22% 7% 9% 21% 41% 28% 7% 26% 44% 24% 7% 26% 29% 38% 10% 28% 34% 28% Custom questionsBelow are the complete set of responses to each custom question on the survey. By default, “don’t know” responses areexcluded, but may be added to the table using the response filter below.% positiveInclude "don't know"No 36 43 Please rate how much of apriority, if at all, you think it is forMoorpark to invest in thefollowing parks and recreationfacilities and amenities ifadditional city funding isavailable.Community pool High priorityMedium priorityLow priorityNot a prioritySplash pads High priorityMedium priorityLow priorityNot a priorityDisc golf course High priorityMedium priorityLow priorityNot a priorityAdditional dog parks High priorityMedium priorityLow priorityNot a priorityAdditional open spaces for passive uses(hiking, etc.)High priorityMedium priorityLow priorityNot a priorityAdditional trails and bicycle paths High priorityMedium priorityLow priorityNot a priorityAdditional soccer/multi-use fields High priorityMedium priorityLow priorityNot a priorityAdditional baseball/softball fields High priorityMedium priorityLow priorityNot a priorityAdditional sports field lighting High priorityMedium priorityLow priorityNot a priorityAdditional pickleball courts High priorityMedium priorityLow priorityNot a prioritySand volleyball courts High priorityMedium priorityLow priorityNot a priorityExpansion of the recreation center & gym,including a teen center High priorityMedium priorityLow priorityNot a priorityAdditional recreation programs High priorityMedium priorityLow priorityNot a priorityPlease rate how important, if atall, you think it is for Moorpark toattract providers of each of thefollowing mental health services.Psychiatric services EssentialVery importantSomewhat importantNot at all important Psychological testing Essential Somewhat important Not at all important Individual or group therapy Essential Very important Somewhat important Not at all important Crisis intervention Essential Very important Somewhat important Not at all important Suicide prevention Essential Very important Somewhat important Not at all important Medication services Essential Very important Somewhat important Not at all important Rehabilitation services Essential Very important Somewhat important Not at all important Case management services Essential Very important Somewhat important Not at all important Please indicate which of the following, if any, you believe is the single biggest barrier to accessing mental health services in Moorpark. (Select only one option.) Cost of services Insurance coverage Limited availability of s.. Lack of information Social/societal stigma Quality of services Hours of operation Proximity to the city Lack of transportation t.. Language barriers Other unlisted barrier None of these/Don't kn.. 10% 28% 28% 8% 32% 32% 29% 5% 24% 30% 40% 4% 17% 30% 48% 6% 28% 35% 30% 8% 32% 34% 27% 9% 30% 38% 22% 25% 0% 0% 0% 2% 0% 3% 13% 17% 12% 25% Custom questionsBelow are the complete set of responses to each custom question on the survey. By default, “don’t know” responses areexcluded, but may be added to the table using the response filter below.% positiveInclude "don't know"No Psychological testing 37 44 Please rate how much of apriority, if at all, you think it is forMoorpark to invest in thefollowing parks and recreationfacilities and amenities ifadditional city funding isavailable.Community pool High priorityMedium priorityLow priorityNot a prioritySplash pads High priorityMedium priorityLow priorityNot a priorityDisc golf course High priorityMedium priorityLow priorityNot a priorityAdditional dog parks High priorityMedium priorityLow priorityNot a priorityAdditional open spaces for passive uses(hiking, etc.)High priorityMedium priorityLow priorityNot a priorityAdditional trails and bicycle paths High priorityMedium priorityLow priorityNot a priorityAdditional soccer/multi-use fields High priorityMedium priorityLow priorityNot a priorityAdditional baseball/softball fields High priorityMedium priorityLow priorityNot a priorityAdditional sports field lighting High priorityMedium priorityLow priorityNot a priorityAdditional pickleball courts High priorityMedium priorityLow priorityNot a prioritySand volleyball courts High priorityMedium priorityLow priorityNot a priorityExpansion of the recreation center & gym,including a teen center High priorityMedium priorityLow priorityNot a priorityAdditional recreation programs High priorityMedium priorityLow priorityNot a priorityPlease rate how important, if atall, you think it is for Moorpark toattract providers of each of thefollowing mental health services.Psychiatric services EssentialVery importantSomewhat importantNot at all importantPsychological testing EssentialVery importantSomewhat importantNot at all importantIndividual or group therapy EssentialVery importantSomewhat importantNot at all importantCrisis intervention EssentialVery importantSomewhat importantNot at all importantSuicide prevention EssentialVery importantSomewhat importantNot at all importantMedication services EssentialVery importantSomewhat importantNot at all importantRehabilitation services EssentialVery importantSomewhat importantNot at all importantCase management services EssentialVery importantSomewhat importantNot at all importantPlease indicate which of the following, if any,you believe is the single biggest barrier toaccessing mental health services in Moorpark.(Select only one option.)Cost of servicesInsurance coverageLimited availability of s..Lack of information Social/societal stigma Quality of services Hours of operation Proximity to the city Lack of transportation t.. Language barriers Other unlisted barrier None of these/Don't kn..25% 0% 0% 0% 2% 0% 1% Custom questionsBelow are the complete set of responses to each custom question on the survey. By default, “don’t know” responses areexcluded, but may be added to the table using the response filter below.% positiveInclude "don't know"No Please indicate which of the following, if any, you believe is the single biggest barrier to accessing mental health services in Moorpark. (Select only one option.) 38 45 % p o s i t i v e Ra n k Nu m b e r o f co m m u n i t i e s Pe r c e n t i l e Please rate each of the following aspects of quality of life in Moorpark. Moorpark as a place to live Similar Your neighborhood as a place to live Similar Moorpark as a place to raise children Higher Moorpark as a place to work Lower Moorpark as a place to visit Lower Moorpark as a place to retire Similar The overall quality of life Similar Sense of community Similar Please rate each of the following characteristics as they relate to Moorpark as a whole. Overall economic health Similar Overall quality of the transportation system Similar Overall design or layout of residential and commercial areas Similar Overall quality of the utility infrastructure Similar Overall feeling of safety Higher Overall quality of natural environment Similar Overall quality of parks and recreation opportunities Similar Overall health and wellness opportunities Similar Overall opportunities for education, culture, and the arts Similar Residents' connection and engagement with their community Similar Please indicate how likely or unlikely you are to do each of the following.each of the following. Recommend living in Moorpark to someone who asks Similar Remain in Moorpark for the next five years Similar 833666295% 893183493% 923703095% 1936129049% 2031925545% 763668676% 803917692% 883183877% 3930618761% 632037660% 6629910167% 621987672% 843565793% 6130811983% 832033591% 5230114574% 5330314366% 692006263% 783106893% National benchmark tables This table contains the comparisons of Moorpark's results to those from other communities. The first column shows the comparison of Moorpark's rating to the benchmark. Moorpark's results are noted as being “higher”, “lower” or “similar” to the benchmark, meaning that the average rating given by Moorpark residents is statistically similar to or different than the benchmark. The second column is Moorpark's “percent positive.” Most commonly, the percent positive is the combination of the top two most positive response options (i.e., excellent/good). The third column is the rank assigned to Moorpark's rating among communities where a similar question was asked. The fourth column is the number of communities that asked a similar question. The fifth column shows the percentile for Moorpark's result -- that is what percent of surveyed communities had a lower rating than Moorpark. 39 46 Please indicate how likely or unlikely you are to do each of the following. Recommend living in Moorpark to someone who asks Similar Remain in Moorpark for the next five years Similar Please rate how safe or unsafe you feel: In your neighborhood during the day Similar In Moorpark's downtown/commercial area during the day Similar From property crime Similar From violent crime Similar From fire, flood, or other natural disaster Similar Please rate the job you feel the Moorpark community does at each of the following. Making all residents feel welcome Similar Attracting people from diverse backgrounds Similar Valuing/respecting residents from diverse backgrounds Similar Taking care of vulnerable residents Higher Please rate each of the following in the Moorpark community. Overall quality of business and service establishments Similar Variety of business and service establishments Similar Vibrancy of downtown/commercial area Lower Employment opportunities Similar Shopping opportunities Similar Cost of living Similar Overall image or reputation Similar Please also rate each of the following in the Moorpark community. Traffic flow on major streets Similar Ease of public parking Higher Ease of travel by car Similar Ease of travel by public transportation Higher Ease of travel by bicycle Similar Ease of walking Similar Well-planned residential growth Similar Well-planned commercial growth Similar Well-designed neighborhoods Similar Preservation of the historical or cultural character of the community Similar 933072192% 853374998% 5532114394% 732085784% 692086490% 2719814577% 902062080% 772034766% 812043974% 832003468% 2730822562% 2220115642% 1428724529% 2232225031% 2731322738% 4930015238% 763618581% 3133322842% 822824976% 6332111873% 762826649% 5732313960% 6932410173% 672026657% 2820214537% 801993971% 40 47 Please also rate each of the following in the Moorpark community. Well-designed neighborhoods Similar Preservation of the historical or cultural character of the community Similar Public places where people want to spend time Similar Variety of housing options Similar Availability of affordable quality housing Similar Overall quality of new development Similar Overall appearance Similar Cleanliness Higher Water resources Much lower Air quality Similar Availability of paths and walking trails Similar Fitness opportunities Similar Recreational opportunities Similar Availability of affordable quality food Similar Availability of affordable quality health care Similar Availability of preventive health services Similar Availability of affordable quality mental health care Similar Opportunities to attend cultural/arts/music activities Similar Community support for the arts Similar Availability of affordable quality childcare/preschool Similar K-12 education Similar Adult educational opportunities Similar Sense of civic/community pride Similar Neighborliness of residents Similar Opportunities to participate in social events and activities Similar Opportunities to attend special events and festivals Similar Opportunities to volunteer Similar Opportunities to participate in community matters Similar 4219811457% 1929423745% 4830615845% 4632817531% 3531820648% 5934013877% 763297886% 718217028% 4829415379% 4132419065% 2929420764% 4331517864% 3428919159% 4229917260% 3228519355% 3028620034% 2431123641% 3019914045% 6129611453% 682999582% 5629112958% 641997169% 822965273% 4930315561% 4530016462% 3629919063% 41 48 Please also rate each of the following in the Moorpark community. Opportunities to volunteer Similar Opportunities to participate in community matters Similar Openness and acceptance of the community toward people of diverse backgrounds Similar Please indicate whether or not you have done each of the following in the last 12 months. Contacted the City of Moorpark for help or information Lower Contacted Moorpark elected officials to express your opinion Similar Attended a local public meeting Similar Watched a local public meeting Similar Volunteered your time to some group/activity Similar Campaigned or advocated for a local issue, cause, or candidate Similar Voted in your most recent local election Similar Used public transportation instead of driving Similar Carpooled with other adults or children instead of driving alone Similar Walked or biked instead of driving Similar Please rate the quality of each of the following services in Moorpark. Public information services Similar Economic development Similar Traffic enforcement Similar Traffic signal timing Similar Street repair Similar Street cleaning Higher Street lighting Similar Sidewalk maintenance Similar Bus or transit services Higher Land use, planning and zoning Similar Code enforcement Similar Affordable high-speed internet access Similar Garbage collection Similar Drinking water Similar Sewer services Similar 3730118957% 6231812061% 933630435% 2829421213% 4229717117% 2127821818% 4530016531% 4328916417% 762014982% 5726811616% 6029111644% 5829512460% 3931318962% 1530725938% 5535515862% 672999958% 5234916749% 923132583% 773427872% 743107965% 812795464% 6031512650% 5834814747% 4919710152% 713329587% 5931112878% 42 49 Please rate the quality of each of the following services in Moorpark. Drinking water Similar Sewer services Similar Storm water management Similar Power (electric and/or gas) utility Lower Utility billing Similar Police/Sheriff services Similar Crime prevention Higher Animal control Similar Ambulance or emergency medical services Similar Fire services Similar Fire prevention and education Similar Emergency preparedness Similar Preservation of natural areas Similar Moorpark open space Similar Recycling Similar Yard waste pick-up Similar City parks Similar Recreation programs or classes Similar Recreation centers or facilities Similar Health services Similar Public library services Similar Overall customer service by Moorpark employees Similar Please rate the following categories of Moorpark government performance. The value of services for the taxes paid to Moorpark Similar The overall direction that Moorpark is taking Similar The job Moorpark government does at welcoming resident involvement Similar Overall confidence in Moorpark government Similar Generally acting in the best interest of the community Similar Being honest Similar 693149887% 753268080% 925523363% 2028022559% 833826589% 883544383% 743258380% 4832016690% 723459597% 5731013382% 5330914468% 702928869% 682849169% 3933420269% 662919982% 6232712284% 743218378% 683039776% 4927914167% 1132428774% 6437013285% 763748863% 5133916658% 6033713553% 5630413355% 5330814558% 43 50 Please rate the following categories of Moorpark government performance. Generally acting in the best interest of the community Similar Being honest Similar Being open and transparent to the public Similar Informing residents about issues facing the community Similar Treating all residents fairly Similar Treating residents with respect Similar Overall, how would you rate the quality of the services provided by each of the following? The City of Moorpark Similar The Federal Government Similar Please rate how important, if at all, you think it is for the Moorpark community to focus on each of the following in the coming two years. Overall economic health Similar Overall quality of the transportation system Similar Overall design or layout of residential and commercial areas Similar Overall quality of the utility infrastructure Similar Overall feeling of safety Similar Overall quality of natural environment Similar Overall quality of parks and recreation opportunities Similar Overall health and wellness opportunities Similar Overall opportunities for education, culture, and the arts Similar Residents' connection and engagement with their community Similar In general, how many times do you: Access the internet from your home Similar Access the internet from your cell phone Similar Visit social media sites Similar Use or check email Similar Share your opinions online Similar Shop online Higher Please rate your overall health.Similar What impact, if any, do you think the economy will have on your family income in the next 6 months? Do you think the impact will be:Similar 672999864% 602058157% 5121010347% 713058763% 562028967% 4736619272% 4928814739% 932821894% 2619814769% 822825185% 4419711187% 822825092% 822825089% 651987083% 4528215575% 4328216173% 3928217270% 911981898% 861982897% 541979180% 721985598% 3619812728% 901971968% 6529010072% 3329219420% 44 51 % p o s i t i v e Ra n k Nu m b e r o f co m m u n i t i e s Pe r c e n t i l e Please rate each of the following aspects of quality of life in Moorpark. Moorpark as a place to live Similar Your neighborhood as a place to live Higher Moorpark as a place to raise children Higher Moorpark as a place to work Lower Moorpark as a place to visit Similar Moorpark as a place to retire Higher The overall quality of life Similar Sense of community Higher Please rate each of the following characteristics as they relate to Moorpark as a whole. Overall economic health Similar Overall quality of the transportation system Similar Overall design or layout of residential and commercial areas Similar Overall quality of the utility infrastructure Similar Overall feeling of safety Higher Overall quality of natural environment Similar Overall quality of parks and recreation opportunities Higher Overall health and wellness opportunities Similar Overall opportunities for education, culture, and the arts Similar Residents' connection and engagement with their community Similar Please indicate how likely or unlikely you are to do each of the following. Recommend living in Moorpark to someone who asks Similar Remain in Moorpark for the next five years Higher Please rate how safe or unsafe you feel:In your neighborhood during the day Similar In Moorpark's downtown/commercial area during the day Similar 8843695% 9739293% 9242495% 16423649% 20403345% 9344476% 8845692% 9540377% 44382261% 46261560% 72361167% 50261472% 8739693% 74391183% 9627291% 47362074% 62371566% 7626763% 7939993% 9739292% 8739698% Custom benchmark tables This table contains the comparisons of Moorpark's results to those from other communities with a similar population (30,000 to 45,000). The first column shows the comparison of Moorpark's rating to the benchmark. Moorpark's results are noted as being “higher”, “lower” or “similar” to the benchmark, meaning that the average rating given by Moorpark residents is statistically similar to or different than the benchmark. The second column is Moorpark's “percent positive.” Most commonly, the percent positive is the combination of the top two most positive response options (i.e., excellent/good). The third column is the rank assigned to Moorpark's rating among communities where a similar question was asked. The fourth column is the number of communities that asked a similar question. The fifth column shows the percentile for Moorpark's result -- that is what percent of surveyed communities had a lower rating than Moorpark. 45 52 Please rate how safe or unsafe you feel: In your neighborhood during the day Similar In Moorpark's downtown/commercial area during the day Similar From property crime Similar From violent crime Similar From fire, flood, or other natural disaster Similar Please rate the job you feel the Moorpark community does at each of the following. Making all residents feel welcome Similar Attracting people from diverse backgrounds Similar Valuing/respecting residents from diverse backgrounds Similar Taking care of vulnerable residents Similar Please rate each of the following in the Moorpark community. Overall quality of business and service establishments Similar Variety of business and service establishments Lower Vibrancy of downtown/commercial area Lower Employment opportunities Similar Shopping opportunities Similar Cost of living Similar Overall image or reputation Higher Please also rate each of the following in the Moorpark community. Traffic flow on major streets Similar Ease of public parking Similar Ease of travel by car Similar Ease of travel by public transportation Similar Ease of travel by bicycle Similar Ease of walking Similar Well-planned residential growth Similar Well-planned commercial growth Similar Well-designed neighborhoods Similar Preservation of the historical or cultural character of the community Similar Public places where people want to spend time Similar Variety of housing options Similar Availability of affordable quality housing Similar Overall quality of new development Similar 60381694% 7625784% 7225890% 23262177% 9228380% 7128966% 7027974% 7626768% 23383062% 15262342% 11353229% 16423631% 17403438% 37372438% 8643781% 23423342% 7736976% 56391873% 72371149% 51392060% 69391373% 57261257% 15262337% 8425571% 26262057% 19363045% 35392645% 40402531% 46 53 Please also rate each of the following in the Moorpark community. Availability of affordable quality housing Similar Overall quality of new development Similar Overall appearance Similar Cleanliness Higher Water resources Much lower Air quality Similar Availability of paths and walking trails Similar Fitness opportunities Similar Recreational opportunities Similar Availability of affordable quality food Similar Availability of affordable quality health care Similar Availability of preventive health services Similar Availability of affordable quality mental health care Similar Opportunities to attend cultural/arts/music activities Similar Community support for the arts Similar Availability of affordable quality childcare/preschool Similar K-12 education Higher Adult educational opportunities Similar Sense of civic/community pride Similar Neighborliness of residents Similar Opportunities to participate in social events and activities Similar Opportunities to attend special events and festivals Similar Opportunities to volunteer Similar Opportunities to participate in community matters Similar Openness and acceptance of the community toward people of diverse backgrounds Similar Please indicate whether or not you have done each of the following in the last 12 months. Contacted the City of Moorpark for help or information Similar Contacted Moorpark elected officials to express your opinion Similar Attended a local public meeting Similar Watched a local public meeting Similar Volunteered your time to some group/activity Similar 31412948% 70411377% 8540786% 12252328% 43372279% 37402665% 31352564% 48412264% 18383259% 28392960% 21383155% 20352934% 17413541% 19262245% 44382253% 72371182% 57381758% 65261069% 8536673% 52381961% 47362062% 38392563% 34382657% 47402261% 17393335% 44362113% 65381417% 40352218% 47 54 Please indicate whether or not you have done each of the following in the last 12 months. Watched a local public meeting Similar Volunteered your time to some group/activity Similar Campaigned or advocated for a local issue, cause, or candidate Similar Voted in your most recent local election Similar Used public transportation instead of driving Similar Carpooled with other adults or children instead of driving alone Similar Walked or biked instead of driving Similar Please rate the quality of each of the following services in Moorpark. Public information services Similar Economic development Lower Traffic enforcement Similar Traffic signal timing Similar Street repair Similar Street cleaning Higher Street lighting Similar Sidewalk maintenance Similar Bus or transit services Similar Land use, planning and zoning Similar Code enforcement Similar Affordable high-speed internet access Similar Garbage collection Similar Drinking water Similar Sewer services Similar Storm water management Similar Power (electric and/or gas) utility Lower Utility billing Similar Police/Sheriff services Similar Crime prevention Higher Animal control Similar Ambulance or emergency medical services Similar Fire services Similar 69361231% 58361617% 8127682% 58361616% 63361444% 61361560% 28392962% 7383638% 52422162% 54351758% 53432149% 9540383% 77401072% 72371165% 74351064% 53412050% 60411747% 38261752% 72401287% 55361778% 62371587% 66361380% 9333163% 13363259% 8644789% 9042583% 67401480% 43372290% 48 55 Please rate the quality of each of the following services in Moorpark. Ambulance or emergency medical services Similar Fire services Similar Fire prevention and education Similar Emergency preparedness Similar Preservation of natural areas Similar Moorpark open space Similar Recycling Similar Yard waste pick-up Similar City parks Similar Recreation programs or classes Similar Recreation centers or facilities Similar Health services Similar Public library services Similar Overall customer service by Moorpark employees Similar Please rate the following categories of Moorpark government performance. The value of services for the taxes paid to Moorpark Similar The overall direction that Moorpark is taking Similar The job Moorpark government does at welcoming resident involvement Similar Overall confidence in Moorpark government Similar Generally acting in the best interest of the community Similar Being honest Similar Being open and transparent to the public Similar Informing residents about issues facing the community Similar Treating all residents fairly Similar Treating residents with respect Similar Overall, how would you rate the quality of the services provided by each .. The City of Moorpark Similar The Federal Government Similar Please rate how important, if at all, you think it is for the Moorpark community to focus on each of the following in the coming two years. Overall economic health Similar Overall quality of the transportation system Similar Overall design or layout of residential and commercial areas Similar Overall quality of the utility infrastructure Similar 66391497% 57381782% 52402068% 8035869% 74351069% 40402569% 70371282% 66391484% 74391178% 73381176% 32342467% 15393474% 61421785% 76441163% 47402258% 50402153% 50361955% 43372258% 50361964% 50261457% 39281847% 63381563% 52251367% 45402372% 48351939% 9136494% 34261869% 8836585% 49 56 Please rate how important, if at all, you think it is for the Moorpark community to focus on each of the following in the coming two years. Overall design or layout of residential and commercial areas Similar Overall quality of the utility infrastructure Similar Overall feeling of safety Similar Overall quality of natural environment Similar Overall quality of parks and recreation opportunities Similar Overall health and wellness opportunities Similar Overall opportunities for education, culture, and the arts Similar Residents' connection and engagement with their community Similar In general, how many times do you: Access the internet from your home Similar Access the internet from your cell phone Similar Visit social media sites Similar Use or check email Similar Share your opinions online Similar Shop online Higher Please rate your overall health.Similar What impact, if any, do you think the economy will have on your family income in the next 6 months? Do you think the impact will be:Similar 42261687% 8636692% 9436389% 7326883% 61361575% 47362073% 44362170% 9225398% 9225397% 56251280% 8025698% 36251728% 9625268% 69361272% 33362520% 50 57 Please rate each of the following aspects of quality of life in Moorpark. Moorpark as a place to live Excellent Good Fair Poor Your neighborhood as a place to live Excellent Good Fair Poor Moorpark as a place to raise children Excellent Good Fair Poor Moorpark as a place to work Excellent Good Fair Poor Moorpark as a place to visit Excellent Good Fair Poor Moorpark as a place to retire Excellent Good Fair Poor The overall quality of life Excellent Good Fair Poor Excellent 0% N=2 5% N=23 42% N=189 53% N=243 1% N=5 6% N=28 34% N=159 59% N=272 0% N= 5% N=21 32% N=141 63% N=272 20% N=65 30% N=99 33% N=107 17% N=53 14% N=65 40% N=183 32% N=147 13% N=58 8% N=33 16% N=64 41% N=168 35% N=140 1% N=3 8% N=35 52% N=241 40% N=184 Complete set of frequencies This dashboard contains a complete set of responses to each question on the survey. By default, "don't know" responses are excluded, but may be added to the table using the response filter to the right. In some tables, the percentages may not sum to 100%; this is either because the question permitted the respondent to "choose all that apply", or for a question that asked the respondent to select one answer, it is due to the customary practice of rounding values to the nearest whole number. 51 58 Please rate each of the following aspects of quality of life in Moorpark. The overall quality of life Poor Sense of community Excellent Good Fair Poor Please rate each of the following characteristics as they relate to Moorpark as a whole. Overall economic health Excellent Good Fair Poor Overall quality of the transportation system Excellent Good Fair Poor Overall design or layout of residential and commercial areas Excellent Good Fair Poor Overall quality of the utility infrastructure Excellent Good Fair Poor Overall feeling of safety Excellent Good Fair Poor Overall quality of natural environment Excellent Good Fair Poor Overall quality of parks and recreation opportunities Excellent Good Fair Poor 5% N=21 19% N=84 47% N=212 30% N=135 5% N=20 34% N=139 52% N=210 9% N=39 10% N=45 30% N=127 48% N=207 12% N=50 7% N=32 27% N=123 50% N=230 17% N=79 4% N=18 24% N=108 52% N=231 20% N=89 1% N=4 6% N=28 45% N=207 48% N=220 4% N=19 13% N=60 47% N=219 36% N=165 1% N=5 8% N=38 45% N=207 45% N=208 52 59 Please rate each of the following characteristics as they relate to Moorpark as a whole. Overall quality of parks and recreation opportunities Fair Poor Overall health and wellness opportunities Excellent Good Fair Poor Overall opportunities for education, culture, and the arts Excellent Good Fair Poor Residents' connection and engagement with their community Excellent Good Fair Poor Please indicate how likely or unlikely you are to do each of the following. Recommend living in Moorpark to someone who asks Very likely Somewhat likely Somewhat unlikely Very unlikely Remain in Moorpark for the next five years Very likely Somewhat likely Somewhat unlikely Very unlikely Please rate how safe or unsafe you feel: In your neighborhood during the day Very safe Somewhat safe Neither safe nor unsafe Somewhat unsafe In Moorpark's downtown/commercial area during the day Very safe Somewhat safe Neither safe nor unsafe Somewhat unsafe Very unsafe From property crime Very safe Somewhat safe 1% N=5 4% N=16 22% N=91 51% N=215 23% N=96 6% N=28 28% N=122 48% N=210 18% N=81 7% N=32 29% N=125 48% N=204 16% N=67 3% N=14 4% N=17 28% N=129 65% N=297 4% N=20 3% N=16 24% N=108 68% N=310 1% N=4 2% N=7 14% N=65 84% N=388 1% N=3 1% N=5 5% N=21 30% N=134 64% N=291 46% N=209 38% N=171 53 60 Please rate how safe or unsafe you feel: From property crime Very safe Somewhat safe Neither safe nor unsafe Somewhat unsafe Very unsafe From violent crime Very safe Somewhat safe Neither safe nor unsafe Somewhat unsafe From fire, flood, or other natural disaster Very safe Somewhat safe Neither safe nor unsafe Somewhat unsafe Very unsafe Please rate the job you feel the Moorpark community does at each of the following. Making all residents feel welcome Excellent Good Fair Poor Attracting people from diverse backgrounds Excellent Good Fair Poor Valuing/respecting residents from diverse backgrounds Excellent Good Fair Poor Taking care of vulnerable residents Excellent Good Fair Poor Please rate each of the following in the Moorpark community. Overall quality of business and service establishments Excellent Good Fair 1% N=3 4% N=18 11% N=49 46% N=209 1% N=5 8% N=38 33% N=152 57% N=258 2% N=10 6% N=27 15% N=70 41% N=187 36% N=163 2% N=9 18% N=74 49% N=205 32% N=133 8% N=33 26% N=103 39% N=158 27% N=108 7% N=26 20% N=77 45% N=174 29% N=111 8% N=27 24% N=76 40% N=128 28% N=90 27% N=126 48% N=223 14% N=65 54 61 Please rate each of the following in the Moorpark community. Overall quality of business and service establishments Good Fair Poor Variety of business and service establishments Excellent Good Fair Poor Vibrancy of downtown/commercial area Excellent Good Fair Poor Employment opportunities Excellent Good Fair Poor Shopping opportunities Excellent Good Fair Poor Cost of living Excellent Good Fair Poor Overall image or reputation Excellent Good Fair Poor Please also rate each of the following in the Moorpark community. Traffic flow on major streets Excellent Good Fair Poor Ease of public parking Excellent Good 11% N=50 27% N=126 18% N=84 39% N=180 31% N=142 12% N=54 29% N=131 41% N=186 23% N=103 6% N=29 26% N=82 43% N=137 25% N=79 6% N=18 21% N=97 40% N=188 29% N=136 9% N=42 16% N=74 46% N=213 32% N=147 6% N=30 1% N=6 17% N=79 48% N=217 34% N=153 28% N=127 31% N=143 30% N=139 11% N=52 51% N=230 25% N=111 55 62 Please also rate each of the following in the Moorpark community. Ease of public parking Excellent Good Fair Poor Ease of travel by car Excellent Good Fair Poor Ease of travel by public transportation Excellent Good Fair Poor Ease of travel by bicycle Excellent Good Fair Poor Ease of walking Excellent Good Fair Poor Well-planned residential growth Excellent Good Fair Poor Well-planned commercial growth Excellent Good Fair Poor Well-designed neighborhoods Excellent Good Fair Poor Excellent 5% N=22 19% N=84 51% N=230 7% N=34 20% N=91 42% N=196 31% N=141 19% N=47 32% N=78 38% N=94 11% N=27 18% N=58 23% N=75 45% N=146 15% N=50 8% N=34 20% N=87 46% N=207 26% N=118 17% N=69 26% N=104 42% N=169 15% N=62 33% N=125 30% N=115 28% N=107 9% N=33 6% N=27 23% N=103 49% N=221 22% N=97 56 63 Please also rate each of the following in the Moorpark community. Well-designed neighborhoods Poor Preservation of the historical or cultural character of the community Excellent Good Fair Poor Public places where people want to spend time Excellent Good Fair Poor Variety of housing options Excellent Good Fair Poor Availability of affordable quality housing Excellent Good Fair Poor Overall quality of new development Excellent Good Fair Poor Overall appearance Excellent Good Fair Poor Cleanliness Excellent Good Fair Poor Water resources Excellent Good Fair Poor 11% N=43 32% N=128 38% N=149 19% N=77 17% N=74 39% N=172 31% N=139 13% N=60 18% N=78 36% N=154 33% N=142 12% N=50 34% N=130 34% N=130 23% N=87 8% N=31 17% N=63 35% N=134 37% N=138 11% N=43 2% N=11 21% N=96 51% N=234 26% N=119 1% N=6 12% N=56 49% N=223 38% N=173 36% N=137 35% N=132 21% N=79 7% N=28 57 64 Please also rate each of the following in the Moorpark community. Water resources Fair Poor Air quality Excellent Good Fair Poor Availability of paths and walking trails Excellent Good Fair Poor Fitness opportunities Excellent Good Fair Poor Recreational opportunities Excellent Good Fair Poor Availability of affordable quality food Excellent Good Fair Poor Availability of affordable quality health care Excellent Good Fair Poor Availability of preventive health services Excellent Good Fair Poor Availability of affordable quality mental health care Excellent Good Fair 36% N=137 2% N=8 19% N=87 49% N=222 30% N=136 8% N=38 26% N=117 41% N=184 25% N=110 8% N=33 29% N=122 46% N=199 17% N=74 5% N=23 30% N=126 42% N=176 22% N=92 9% N=39 32% N=147 46% N=209 13% N=57 9% N=36 31% N=120 51% N=201 9% N=34 9% N=32 36% N=123 47% N=160 8% N=28 38% N=85 30% N=68 4% N=10 58 65 Please also rate each of the following in the Moorpark community. Availability of affordable quality mental health care Good Fair Poor Opportunities to attend cultural/arts/music activities Excellent Good Fair Poor Community support for the arts Excellent Good Fair Poor Availability of affordable quality childcare/preschool Excellent Good Fair Poor K-12 education Excellent Good Fair Poor Adult educational opportunities Excellent Good Fair Poor Sense of civic/community pride Excellent Good Fair Poor Neighborliness of residents Excellent Good Fair Poor Opportunities to participate in social events and activities Excellent Good 28% N=63 38% N=85 16% N=69 43% N=180 32% N=135 9% N=39 15% N=53 40% N=148 35% N=130 10% N=37 13% N=34 34% N=90 42% N=108 11% N=29 3% N=10 15% N=49 50% N=168 32% N=108 11% N=33 31% N=92 42% N=126 15% N=45 6% N=24 26% N=111 50% N=218 18% N=79 3% N=12 24% N=108 51% N=229 22% N=101 46% N=199 15% N=67 59 66 Please also rate each of the following in the Moorpark community. Opportunities to participate in social events and activities Excellent Good Fair Poor Opportunities to attend special events and festivals Excellent Good Fair Poor Opportunities to volunteer Excellent Good Fair Poor Opportunities to participate in community matters Excellent Good Fair Poor Openness and acceptance of the community toward people of diverse backgrounds Excellent Good Fair Poor Please indicate whether or not you have done each of the following in the last 12 months. Contacted the City of Moorpark for help or information No Yes Contacted Moorpark elected officials to express your opinion No Yes Attended a local public meeting No Yes Watched a local public meeting No Yes Volunteered your time to some group/activity No Yes Campaigned or advocated for a local issue, cause, or candidate No Yes No 6% N=26 33% N=144 46% N=199 5% N=22 33% N=146 43% N=188 19% N=85 4% N=13 33% N=111 47% N=157 16% N=53 6% N=21 37% N=134 45% N=163 12% N=44 4% N=14 36% N=136 46% N=176 14% N=55 34% N=159 66% N=301 13% N=61 87% N=397 17% N=79 83% N=381 18% N=81 82% N=376 30% N=140 70% N=318 17% N=79 83% N=380 60 67 Please indicate whether or not you have done each of the following in the last 12 months. Campaigned or advocated for a local issue, cause, or candidate Yes Voted in your most recent local election No Yes Used public transportation instead of driving No Yes Carpooled with other adults or children instead of driving alone No Yes Walked or biked instead of driving No Yes Please rate the quality of each of the following services in Moorpark. Public information services Excellent Good Fair Poor Economic development Excellent Good Fair Poor Traffic enforcement Excellent Good Fair Poor Traffic signal timing Excellent Good Fair Poor Street repair Excellent Good Fair Poor Street cleaning Excellent Good Fair Poor 82% N=377 18% N=82 16% N=74 84% N=384 43% N=200 57% N=260 60% N=276 40% N=185 4% N=15 33% N=120 50% N=179 13% N=45 19% N=67 43% N=154 30% N=107 8% N=28 7% N=30 31% N=133 45% N=193 17% N=72 12% N=56 30% N=133 43% N=194 15% N=67 20% N=92 30% N=137 37% N=167 12% N=55 2% N=8 15% N=67 55% N=243 28% N=127 61 68 Please rate the quality of each of the following services in Moorpark. Street cleaning Fair Poor Street lighting Excellent Good Fair Poor Sidewalk maintenance Excellent Good Fair Poor Bus or transit services Excellent Good Fair Poor Land use, planning and zoning Excellent Good Fair Poor Code enforcement Excellent Good Fair Poor Affordable high-speed internet access Excellent Good Fair Poor Garbage collection Excellent Good Fair Poor Drinking water Excellent Good Fair 2% N=8 7% N=31 21% N=95 51% N=229 22% N=97 9% N=42 25% N=111 45% N=201 20% N=90 9% N=24 26% N=66 49% N=121 16% N=39 18% N=61 33% N=113 40% N=138 10% N=35 15% N=52 38% N=136 34% N=120 13% N=46 18% N=73 30% N=123 38% N=155 13% N=52 2% N=8 12% N=52 48% N=218 38% N=173 19% N=83 52% N=232 26% N=115 62 69 Please rate the quality of each of the following services in Moorpark. Drinking water Good Fair Poor Sewer services Excellent Good Fair Poor Storm water management Excellent Good Fair Poor Power (electric and/or gas) utility Excellent Good Fair Poor Utility billing Excellent Good Fair Poor Police/Sheriff services Excellent Good Fair Poor Crime prevention Excellent Good Fair Poor Animal control Excellent Good Fair Poor Ambulance or emergency medical services Excellent Good 3% N=14 19% N=83 1% N=3 12% N=53 60% N=259 28% N=121 3% N=11 17% N=69 54% N=216 25% N=101 12% N=54 25% N=111 46% N=208 17% N=78 9% N=39 33% N=144 44% N=196 15% N=64 4% N=16 8% N=33 44% N=192 45% N=198 4% N=15 13% N=55 43% N=180 40% N=169 7% N=25 13% N=49 54% N=197 26% N=96 52% N=171 38% N=124 63 70 Please rate the quality of each of the following services in Moorpark. Ambulance or emergency medical services Excellent Good Fair Poor Fire services Excellent Good Fair Poor Fire prevention and education Excellent Good Fair Poor Emergency preparedness Excellent Good Fair Poor Preservation of natural areas Excellent Good Fair Poor Moorpark open space Excellent Good Fair Poor Recycling Excellent Good Fair Poor Yard waste pick-up Excellent Good Fair Poor Excellent 0% N=2 10% N=33 52% N=171 0% N=1 3% N=11 47% N=181 49% N=190 3% N=9 15% N=50 53% N=175 30% N=98 11% N=35 21% N=63 44% N=134 24% N=75 8% N=35 23% N=95 43% N=179 25% N=105 8% N=33 22% N=92 45% N=185 24% N=100 6% N=25 25% N=105 49% N=207 21% N=88 0% N=2 17% N=70 55% N=223 27% N=108 64 71 Please rate the quality of each of the following services in Moorpark. Yard waste pick-up Poor City parks Excellent Good Fair Poor Recreation programs or classes Excellent Good Fair Poor Recreation centers or facilities Excellent Good Fair Poor Health services Excellent Good Fair Poor Public library services Excellent Good Fair Poor Overall customer service by Moorpark employees Excellent Good Fair Poor Please rate the following categories of Moorpark government performance. The value of services for the taxes paid to Moorpark Excellent Good Fair Poor The overall direction that Moorpark is taking Excellent Good Fair Poor 1% N=5 14% N=65 48% N=217 36% N=164 2% N=8 19% N=68 52% N=184 27% N=95 4% N=17 20% N=75 51% N=193 25% N=97 5% N=18 28% N=93 50% N=167 17% N=59 2% N=9 23% N=87 52% N=192 22% N=83 2% N=9 13% N=48 56% N=215 29% N=109 6% N=23 31% N=122 49% N=195 14% N=56 10% N=40 32% N=128 48% N=192 10% N=41 65 72 Please rate the following categories of Moorpark government performance. The overall direction that Moorpark is taking Fair Poor The job Moorpark government does at welcoming resident involvement Excellent Good Fair Poor Overall confidence in Moorpark government Excellent Good Fair Poor Generally acting in the best interest of the community Excellent Good Fair Poor Being honest Excellent Good Fair Poor Being open and transparent to the public Excellent Good Fair Poor Informing residents about issues facing the community Excellent Good Fair Poor Treating all residents fairly Excellent Good Fair Poor Treating residents with respect Excellent Good Fair 10% N=40 9% N=30 38% N=127 41% N=137 11% N=38 11% N=45 34% N=143 45% N=186 10% N=41 12% N=48 30% N=119 46% N=183 11% N=45 6% N=18 30% N=99 49% N=162 15% N=48 9% N=31 34% N=115 44% N=148 13% N=43 13% N=49 39% N=145 36% N=133 11% N=42 5% N=15 33% N=104 45% N=144 18% N=56 31% N=112 49% N=177 19% N=67 66 73 Please rate the following categories of Moorpark government performance. Treating residents with respect Good Fair Poor Overall, how would you rate the quality of the services provided by each of the following? The City of Moorpark Excellent Good Fair Poor The Federal Government Excellent Good Fair Poor Please rate how important, if at all, you think it is for the Moorpark community to focus on each of the following in the coming two years. Overall economic health Essential Very important Somewhat important Not at all important Overall quality of the transportation system Essential Very important Somewhat important Not at all important Overall design or layout of residential and commercial areas Essential Very important Somewhat important Not at all important Overall quality of the utility infrastructure Essential Very important Somewhat important Not at all important Overall feeling of safety Essential Very important Somewhat important Not at all important Overall quality of natural environment Essential Very important 2% N=8 31% N=112 3% N=13 25% N=104 55% N=233 18% N=75 25% N=100 37% N=148 33% N=133 6% N=24 0% N=1 6% N=26 39% N=179 55% N=249 2% N=11 29% N=131 45% N=204 24% N=110 1% N=6 13% N=61 49% N=223 36% N=166 1% N=7 12% N=54 37% N=171 49% N=224 1% N=7 7% N=31 26% N=118 66% N=298 46% N=207 43% N=196 67 74 Please rate how important, if at all, you think it is for the Moorpark community to focus on each of the following in the coming two years. Overall quality of natural environment Essential Very important Somewhat important Not at all important Overall quality of parks and recreation opportunities Essential Very important Somewhat important Not at all important Overall health and wellness opportunities Essential Very important Somewhat important Not at all important Overall opportunities for education, culture, and the arts Essential Very important Somewhat important Not at all important Residents' connection and engagement with their community Essential Very important Somewhat important Not at all important Please rate how much of a priority, if at all, you think it is for Moorpark to invest in the following parks and recreation facilities and amenities if additional city funding is available. Community pool High priority Medium priority Low priority Not a priority Splash pads High priority Medium priority Low priority Not a priority Disc golf course High priority Medium priority Low priority Not a priority High priority 1% N=3 11% N=49 46% N=207 1% N=6 16% N=71 50% N=223 33% N=149 2% N=8 23% N=105 46% N=207 30% N=134 2% N=7 26% N=116 43% N=196 30% N=136 3% N=13 27% N=123 48% N=217 22% N=100 19% N=84 28% N=128 25% N=115 28% N=128 20% N=93 35% N=160 23% N=107 21% N=95 36% N=163 37% N=167 19% N=88 8% N=38 68 75 Please rate how much of a priority, if at all, you think it is for Moorpark to invest in the following parks and recreation facilities and amenities if additional city funding is available. Disc golf course Not a priority Additional dog parks High priority Medium priority Low priority Not a priority Additional open spaces for passive uses (hiking, etc.) High priority Medium priority Low priority Not a priority Additional trails and bicycle paths High priority Medium priority Low priority Not a priority Additional soccer/multi-use fields High priority Medium priority Low priority Not a priority Additional baseball/softball fields High priority Medium priority Low priority Not a priority Additional sports field lighting High priority Medium priority Low priority Not a priority Additional pickleball courts High priority Medium priority Low priority Not a priority Sand volleyball courts High priority Medium priority Low priority Not a priority 21% N=95 31% N=139 35% N=159 13% N=60 3% N=15 16% N=73 37% N=169 43% N=193 3% N=14 17% N=75 42% N=193 38% N=174 17% N=79 42% N=191 32% N=145 9% N=41 19% N=84 44% N=198 29% N=131 8% N=36 15% N=69 31% N=141 35% N=161 19% N=85 28% N=127 37% N=172 23% N=107 11% N=52 30% N=136 41% N=187 22% N=98 7% N=31 69 76 Please rate how much of a priority, if at all, you think it is for Moorpark to invest in the following parks and recreation facilities and amenities if additional city funding is available. Sand volleyball courts Low priority Not a priority Expansion of the recreation center & gym, including a teen center High priority Medium priority Low priority Not a priority Additional recreation programs High priority Medium priority Low priority Not a priority Please rate how important, if at all, you think it is for Moorpark to attract providers of each of the following mental health services. Psychiatric services Essential Very important Somewhat important Not at all important Psychological testing Essential Very important Somewhat important Not at all important Individual or group therapy Essential Very important Somewhat important Not at all important Crisis intervention Essential Very important Somewhat important Not at all important Suicide prevention Essential Very important Somewhat important Not at all important Medication services Essential Very important Somewhat important 30% N=136 9% N=43 21% N=95 41% N=188 28% N=127 7% N=32 26% N=117 44% N=198 24% N=107 7% N=27 26% N=103 29% N=115 38% N=152 10% N=39 28% N=113 34% N=134 28% N=114 8% N=33 32% N=130 32% N=130 29% N=118 5% N=23 24% N=101 30% N=128 40% N=171 4% N=18 17% N=75 30% N=131 48% N=211 28% N=121 35% N=150 30% N=126 70 77 Please rate how important, if at all, you think it is for Moorpark to attract providers of each of the following mental health services. Medication services Very important Somewhat important Not at all important Rehabilitation services Essential Very important Somewhat important Not at all important Case management services Essential Very important Somewhat important Not at all important Please indicate which of the following, if any, you believe is the single biggest barrier to accessing mental health services in Moorpark. (Select only one option.) Cost of services Insurance coverage Limited availability of services Lack of information Social/societal stigma Quality of services Hours of operation Proximity to the city Lack of transportation to/from services Language barriers Other unlisted barrier None of these/Don't know In general, how many times do you:Access the internet from your home Several times a day Once a day A few times a week Every few weeks Less often or never Access the internet from your cell phone Several times a day Once a day A few times a week Every few weeks Less often or never 6% N=27 28% N=121 8% N=33 32% N=132 34% N=141 27% N=111 9% N=39 30% N=124 38% N=159 22% N=91 25% N=112 0% N=1 0% N=2 0% N=2 2% N=7 0% N= 1% N=6 3% N=13 13% N=60 17% N=77 12% N=56 25% N=113 1% N=5 0% N=2 4% N=16 5% N=22 90% N=410 2% N=11 1% N=5 2% N=11 2% N=9 92% N=417 71 78 In general, how many times do you:Access the internet from your cell phone Every few weeks Less often or never Visit social media sites Several times a day Once a day A few times a week Every few weeks Less often or never Use or check email Several times a day Once a day A few times a week Every few weeks Less often or never Share your opinions online Several times a day Once a day A few times a week Every few weeks Less often or never Shop online Several times a day Once a day A few times a week Every few weeks Less often or never Please rate your overall health.Excellent Very good Good Fair Poor What impact, if any, do you think the economy will have on your family income in the next 6 months? Do you think the impact will be: Very positive Somewhat positive Neutral Somewhat negative Very negative Less than 2 years 2% N=11 16% N=72 4% N=20 7% N=33 15% N=68 57% N=261 1% N=4 1% N=4 4% N=17 10% N=43 85% N=385 59% N=264 14% N=61 13% N=58 4% N=20 10% N=47 8% N=35 24% N=110 38% N=174 11% N=49 19% N=88 0% N=1 6% N=29 22% N=101 43% N=199 29% N=132 11% N=50 32% N=148 36% N=168 14% N=63 7% N=31 72 79 What impact, if any, do you think the economy will have on your family income in the next 6 months? Do you think the impact will be:Very negative How many years have you lived in Moorpark?Less than 2 years 2-5 years 6-10 years 11-20 years More than 20 years Which best describes the building you live in?One family house detached from any other houses Building with two or more homes (duplex, townhome, apa.. Mobile home Other Do you rent or own your home?Rent Own About how much is your monthly housing cost for the place you live (including rent, mortgage payment, property tax, property insurance and homeowners' association (HOA) fees)? Less than $500 $500 to $999 $1,000 to $1,499 $1,500 to $1,999 $2,000 to $2,499 $2,500 to $2,999 $3,000 to $3,499 $3,500 or more Do any children 17 or under live in your household? No Yes Are you or any other members of your household aged 65 or older? No Yes How much do you anticipate your household's total income before taxes will be for the current year? (Please include in your total income money from all sources for all persons living in your household.) Less than $25,000 $25,000 to $49,999 $50,000 to $74,999 $75,000 to $99,999 $100,000 to $149,999 $150,000 or more Are you Spanish, Hispanic or Latino?No, not Spanish, Hispanic, or Latino Yes, I consider myself to be Spanish, Hispanic, or Latino American Indian or Alaskan Native 47% N=219 19% N=87 12% N=54 14% N=65 8% N=38 2% N=9 3% N=12 24% N=111 71% N=330 78% N=358 22% N=101 24% N=106 15% N=66 16% N=70 20% N=90 11% N=50 7% N=33 5% N=21 2% N=11 38% N=173 62% N=285 31% N=141 69% N=319 46% N=201 15% N=64 13% N=58 14% N=63 9% N=38 3% N=13 27% N=123 73% N=328 73 80 Are you Spanish, Hispanic or Latino? Yes, I consider myself to be Spanish, Hispanic, or Latino What is your race? (Mark one or more races to indicate what race you consider yourself to be.) American Indian or Alaskan Native Asian, Asian Indian, or Pacific Islander Black or African American White Other In which category is your age?18-24 years 25-34 years 35-44 years 45-54 years 55-64 years 65-74 years 75 years or older What is your gender?Woman Man Identify in another way 9% N=43 79% N=361 2% N=8 13% N=59 1% N=6 6% N=29 18% N=82 17% N=76 22% N=102 15% N=67 19% N=89 3% N=13 1% N=5 45% N=203 54% N=246 74 81 20 2 0 20 2 2 Please rate each of the following aspects of quality of life in Moorpark. Moorpark as a place to live Your neighborhood as a place to live Moorpark as a place to raise children Moorpark as a place to work Moorpark as a place to visit Moorpark as a place to retire The overall quality of life Sense of community Please rate each of the following characteristics as they relate to Moorpark as a whole. Overall economic health Overall quality of the transportation system Overall design or layout of residential and commercial areas Overall quality of the utility infrastructure Overall feeling of safety Overall quality of natural environment Overall quality of parks and recreation opportunities Overall health and wellness opportunities Overall opportunities for education, culture, and the arts Residents' connection and engagement with their community Recommend living in Moorpark to someone who asks 77% 92% 76% 45% 49% 95% 93% 95% 79% 88% 70% 40% 49% 96% 93% 92% 63% 66% 74% 91% 83% 93% 72% 67% 60% 61% 66% 62% 76% 88% 89% 96% 78% 69% 60% 47% Full trends This table contains the trends over time for the City of Moorpark. The combined "percent positive" responses for each survey year are presented (e.g., excellent/good or yes). If an item was not included during an administration of the survey, no percentage will be shown in the table. If the difference between the 2020 and 2022 surveys is greater than six percentage points, the change is statistically significant. It is important to note that in 2020, The NCS survey was updated to include new and refreshed items. Consequently, some of the trends may be impacted due to wording modifications that could have potentially altered the meaning of the item for the respondent. 75 82 Please rate each of the following characteristics as they relate to Moorpark as a whole.Residents' connection and engagement with their community Please indicate how likely or unlikely you are to do each of the following. Recommend living in Moorpark to someone who asks Remain in Moorpark for the next five years Please rate how safe or unsafe you feel: In your neighborhood during the day In Moorpark's downtown/commercial area during the day From property crime From violent crime From fire, flood, or other natural disaster Please rate the job you feel the Moorpark community does at each of the following. Making all residents feel welcome Attracting people from diverse backgrounds Valuing/respecting residents from diverse backgrounds Taking care of vulnerable residents Please rate each of the following in the Moorpark community. Overall quality of business and service establishments Variety of business and service establishments Vibrancy of downtown/commercial area Employment opportunities Shopping opportunities Cost of living Overall image or reputation Please also rate each of the following in the Moorpark community. Traffic flow on major streets Ease of public parking Ease of travel by car Ease of travel by public transportation Ease of travel by bicycle Ease of walking Well-planned residential growth Well-planned commercial growth 92% 93% 87% 95% 77% 90% 84% 94% 98% 71% 91% 84% 95% 98% 68% 74% 66% 80% 67% 78% 69% 78% 81% 38% 38% 31% 29% 42% 62% 76% 39% 31% 16% 17% 35% 57% 57% 73% 60% 49% 73% 76% 42% 57% 79% 66% 52% 74% 81% 42% 76 83 Please also rate each of the following in the Moorpark community. Well-planned residential growth Well-planned commercial growth Well-designed neighborhoods Preservation of the historical or cultural character of the community Public places where people want to spend time Variety of housing options Availability of affordable quality housing Overall quality of new development Overall appearance Cleanliness Water resources Air quality Availability of paths and walking trails Fitness opportunities Recreational opportunities Availability of affordable quality food Availability of affordable quality health care Availability of preventive health services Availability of affordable quality mental health care Opportunities to attend cultural/arts/music activities Community support for the arts Availability of affordable quality childcare/preschool K-12 education Adult educational opportunities Sense of civic/community pride Neighborliness of residents Opportunities to participate in social events and activities 73% 69% 58% 82% 53% 45% 41% 34% 55% 60% 59% 64% 64% 65% 79% 28% 86% 77% 48% 31% 45% 45% 57% 71% 37% 57% 76% 71% 52% 84% 41% 38% 32% 30% 53% 59% 64% 69% 70% 75% 86% 32% 86% 77% 53% 30% 55% 46% 51% 77% 26% 57% 77 84 Please also rate each of the following in the Moorpark community. Neighborliness of residents Opportunities to participate in social events and activities Opportunities to attend special events and festivals Opportunities to volunteer Opportunities to participate in community matters Openness and acceptance of the community toward people of diver.. Please indicate whether or not you have done each of the following in the last 12 months. Contacted the City of Moorpark for help or information Contacted Moorpark elected officials to express your opinion Attended a local public meeting Watched a local public meeting Volunteered your time to some group/activity Campaigned or advocated for a local issue, cause, or candidate Voted in your most recent local election Used public transportation instead of driving Carpooled with other adults or children instead of driving alone Walked or biked instead of driving Please rate the quality of each of the following services in Moorpark. Public information services Economic development Traffic enforcement Traffic signal timing Street repair Street cleaning Street lighting Sidewalk maintenance Bus or transit services Land use, planning and zoning Code enforcement 61% 57% 63% 62% 61% 65% 59% 58% 53% 54% 60% 44% 16% 82% 17% 31% 18% 17% 13% 35% 63% 46% 17% 92% 21% 26% 27% 22% 15% 34% 50% 64% 65% 72% 83% 49% 58% 62% 38% 62% 52% 61% 69% 80% 80% 53% 61% 70% 34% 72% 78 85 Please rate the quality of each of the following services in Moorpark. Land use, planning and zoning Code enforcement Affordable high-speed internet access Garbage collection Drinking water Sewer services Storm water management Power (electric and/or gas) utility Utility billing Police/Sheriff services Crime prevention Animal control Ambulance or emergency medical services Fire services Fire prevention and education Emergency preparedness Preservation of natural areas Moorpark open space Recycling Yard waste pick-up City parks Recreation programs or classes Recreation centers or facilities Health services Public library services Overall customer service by Moorpark employees The value of services for the taxes paid to Moorpark 85% 74% 67% 76% 78% 84% 82% 69% 69% 69% 68% 82% 97% 90% 80% 83% 89% 59% 63% 80% 87% 78% 87% 52% 47% 89% 80% 73% 75% 82% 84% 88% 73% 74% 76% 67% 77% 90% 94% 86% 89% 91% 78% 82% 82% 88% 84% 88% 65% 52% 79 86 Please rate the quality of each of the following services in Moorpark.Overall customer service by Moorpark employees Please rate the following categories of Moorpark government performance. The value of services for the taxes paid to Moorpark The overall direction that Moorpark is taking The job Moorpark government does at welcoming resident involve.. Overall confidence in Moorpark government Generally acting in the best interest of the community Being honest Being open and transparent to the public Informing residents about issues facing the community Treating all residents fairly Treating residents with respect Overall, how would you rate the quality of the services provided by each of the following? The City of Moorpark The Federal Government Please rate how important, if at all, you think it is for the Moorpark community to focus on each of the following in the coming two years. Overall economic health Overall quality of the transportation system Overall design or layout of residential and commercial areas Overall quality of the utility infrastructure Overall feeling of safety Overall quality of natural environment Overall quality of parks and recreation opportunities Overall health and wellness opportunities Overall opportunities for education, culture, and the arts Residents' connection and engagement with their community In general, how many times do you: Access the internet from your home Access the internet from your cell phone Visit social media sites Use or check email 67% 63% 47% 57% 64% 58% 55% 53% 58% 63% 77% 72% 55% 61% 71% 60% 52% 51% 53% 60% 39% 72% 41% 76% 70% 73% 75% 83% 89% 92% 87% 85% 69% 94% 71% 71% 76% 80% 85% 91% 80% 76% 64% 92% 80% 97% 98% 83% 96% 97% 80 87 In general, how many times do you: Visit social media sites Use or check email Share your opinions online Shop online Please rate your overall health. What impact, if any, do you think the economy will have on your fa.. 68% 28% 98% 71% 39% 99% 72%80% 20%21% 81 88 Methods (open participation) As part of its participation in The National Community Survey™ (The NCS™), the City of Moorpark conducted a survey of 465 residents. Survey invitations were mailed to randomly selected households and data were collected from November 9, 2022 to December 28, 2022. The results from this main survey effort represent the most robust estimate of your residents’ opinions. After the above data collection period was underway, a link to an online open participation survey was publicized by the City of Moorpark. The open participation survey was identical to the probability sample survey with two small updates; it included a map at the beginning asking where the respondent lives and also a question about where they heard about the survey. The open participation survey was open to all city residents and became available on December 14, 2022. The survey remained open for two weeks and there were 18 responses. The open participation survey data were not collected through a random sample and it is unknown who in the community was aware of the survey; therefore, a level of confidence in the representativeness of the sample cannot be estimated. Due to limited response, the results were not statistically weighted. 82 89 In which district of Moorpark do you live? (Refer to map above.) District 1 District 2 District 3 District 4 Please rate each of the following aspects of quality of life in Moorpark. Moorpark as a place to live Excellent Good Fair Poor Your neighborhood as a place to live Excellent Good Fair Poor Moorpark as a place to raise children Excellent Good Poor Moorpark as a place to work Excellent Good Fair Poor Moorpark as a place to visit Excellent Good Fair Poor Moorpark as a place to retire Excellent Good Fair Poor The overall quality of life in Moorpark Excellent Good 11% N=2 22% N=4 28% N=5 39% N=7 11% N=2 22% N=4 11% N=2 56% N=10 6% N=1 11% N=2 28% N=5 56% N=10 11% N=2 33% N=6 56% N=10 21% N=3 43% N=6 21% N=3 14% N=2 39% N=7 28% N=5 22% N=4 11% N=2 18% N=3 12% N=2 47% N=8 24% N=4 33% N=6 33% N=6 Open participation survey results This dashboard contains a complete set of responses to each question on the open participation survey. By default, "don't know" responses are excluded, but may be added to the table using the response filter to the right. In some tables, the percentages may not sum to 100%; this is either because the question permitted the respondent to "choose all that apply", or for a question that asked the respondent to select one answer, it is due to the customary practice of rounding values to the nearest whole number. 83 90 Please rate each of the following aspects of quality of life in Moorpark. The overall quality of life in Moorpark Excellent Good Fair Poor Sense of community Excellent Good Fair Poor Please rate each of the following characteristics as they relate to Moorpark as a whole. Overall economic health of Moorpark Excellent Good Fair Poor Overall quality of the transportation system (auto, bicycle, foot, bus) in Moorpark Excellent Good Fair Poor Overall design or layout of Moorpark's residential and commercial areas (e.g., homes, buildings, streets, parks, etc.) Excellent Good Fair Poor Overall quality of the utility infrastructure in Moorpark (water, sewer, storm water, electric/gas, broadband) Excellent Good Fair Poor Overall feeling of safety in Moorpark Excellent Good Poor Overall quality of natural environment in Moorpark Excellent Good Fair Poor Overall quality of parks and recreation opportunities Excellent Good Fair 11% N=2 22% N=4 33% N=6 17% N=3 28% N=5 22% N=4 33% N=6 20% N=3 47% N=7 27% N=4 7% N=1 41% N=7 18% N=3 35% N=6 6% N=1 33% N=6 28% N=5 28% N=5 11% N=2 41% N=7 24% N=4 12% N=2 24% N=4 6% N=1 50% N=9 44% N=8 6% N=1 11% N=2 50% N=9 33% N=6 17% N=3 44% N=8 33% N=6 84 91 Please rate each of the following characteristics as they relate to Moorpark as a whole. Overall quality of parks and recreation opportunities Good Fair Poor Overall health and wellness opportunities in Moorpark Excellent Good Fair Poor Overall opportunities for education, culture, and the arts Excellent Good Fair Poor Residents' connection and engagement with their community Excellent Good Fair Poor Please indicate how likely or unlikely you are to do each of the following. Recommend living in Moorpark to someone who asks Very likely Somewhat likely Very unlikely Remain in Moorpark for the next five years Very likely Somewhat likely Somewhat unlikely Very unlikely Please rate how safe or unsafe you feel: In your neighborhood during the day Very safe Neither safe nor unsafe Somewhat unsafe In Moorpark's downtown/commercial area during the day Very safe Somewhat safe Neither safe nor unsafe Somewhat unsafe From property crime Very safe Somewhat safe Neither safe nor unsafe Somewhat unsafe Very safe 6% N=1 17% N=3 19% N=3 19% N=3 31% N=5 31% N=5 24% N=4 24% N=4 35% N=6 18% N=3 12% N=2 35% N=6 35% N=6 18% N=3 28% N=5 22% N=4 50% N=9 11% N=2 11% N=2 17% N=3 61% N=11 6% N=1 6% N=1 89% N=16 6% N=1 6% N=1 28% N=5 61% N=11 11% N=2 22% N=4 28% N=5 39% N=7 85 92 Please rate how safe or unsafe you feel: From property crime Somewhat unsafe From violent crime Very safe Somewhat safe Neither safe nor unsafe Somewhat unsafe From fire, flood, or other natural disaster Very safe Somewhat safe Neither safe nor unsafe Somewhat unsafe Please rate the job you feel the Moorpark community does at each of the following. Making all residents feel welcome Excellent Good Fair Poor Attracting people from diverse backgrounds Excellent Good Fair Poor Valuing/respecting residents from diverse backgrounds Excellent Good Fair Poor Taking care of vulnerable residents (elderly, disabled, homeless, etc.) Excellent Good Fair Poor Please rate each of the following in the Moorpark community. Overall quality of business and service establishments in Moorpark Excellent Good Fair Poor Variety of business and service establishments in Moorpark Good Fair Poor Vibrancy of downtown/commercial area Good Fair 6% N=1 11% N=2 17% N=3 67% N=12 22% N=4 11% N=2 50% N=9 17% N=3 19% N=3 31% N=5 31% N=5 19% N=3 29% N=5 12% N=2 47% N=8 12% N=2 13% N=2 19% N=3 50% N=8 19% N=3 27% N=4 27% N=4 27% N=4 20% N=3 28% N=5 44% N=8 22% N=4 6% N=1 33% N=6 56% N=10 11% N=2 35% N=6 6% N=1 86 93 Please rate each of the following in the Moorpark community. Vibrancy of downtown/commercial area Good Fair Poor Employment opportunities Fair Poor Shopping opportunities Good Fair Poor Cost of living in Moorpark Good Fair Poor Overall image or reputation of Moorpark Excellent Good Fair Poor Please also rate each of the following in the Moorpark community. Traffic flow on major streets Good Fair Poor Ease of public parking Excellent Good Fair Poor Ease of travel by car in Moorpark Excellent Good Fair Poor Ease of travel by public transportation in Moorpark Good Fair Poor Ease of travel by bicycle in Moorpark Excellent Good Fair Poor Excellent 59% N=10 35% N=6 54% N=7 46% N=6 39% N=7 50% N=9 11% N=2 29% N=5 41% N=7 29% N=5 24% N=4 6% N=1 59% N=10 12% N=2 56% N=10 6% N=1 39% N=7 6% N=1 39% N=7 33% N=6 22% N=4 17% N=3 28% N=5 39% N=7 17% N=3 36% N=4 45% N=5 18% N=2 25% N=4 31% N=5 38% N=6 6% N=1 87 94 Please also rate each of the following in the Moorpark community. Ease of travel by bicycle in Moorpark Poor Ease of walking in Moorpark Excellent Good Fair Poor Well-planned residential growth Excellent Good Fair Poor Well-planned commercial growth Good Fair Poor Well-designed neighborhoods Excellent Good Fair Poor Preservation of the historical or cultural character of the community Excellent Good Fair Poor Public places where people want to spend time Excellent Good Fair Poor Variety of housing options Excellent Good Fair Poor Availability of affordable quality housing Excellent Good Fair Poor Overall quality of new development in Moorpark Good Fair 24% N=4 24% N=4 35% N=6 18% N=3 31% N=5 19% N=3 38% N=6 13% N=2 50% N=7 43% N=6 7% N=1 11% N=2 33% N=6 39% N=7 17% N=3 29% N=4 21% N=3 43% N=6 7% N=1 44% N=8 39% N=7 11% N=2 6% N=1 41% N=7 18% N=3 35% N=6 6% N=1 57% N=8 29% N=4 7% N=1 7% N=1 31% N=5 50% N=8 88 95 Please also rate each of the following in the Moorpark community. Overall quality of new development in Moorpark Good Fair Poor Overall appearance of Moorpark Excellent Good Fair Poor Cleanliness of Moorpark Excellent Good Fair Poor Water resources (beaches, lakes, ponds, riverways, etc.) Excellent Good Fair Poor Air quality Excellent Good Fair Poor Availability of paths and walking trails Excellent Good Fair Poor Fitness opportunities (including exercise classes and paths or trails, etc.) Excellent Good Fair Poor Recreational opportunities Excellent Good Fair Poor Availability of affordable quality food Excellent Good Fair 19% N=3 31% N=5 17% N=3 17% N=3 44% N=8 22% N=4 11% N=2 11% N=2 44% N=8 33% N=6 31% N=5 44% N=7 19% N=3 6% N=1 6% N=1 22% N=4 61% N=11 11% N=2 24% N=4 18% N=3 47% N=8 12% N=2 17% N=3 22% N=4 50% N=9 11% N=2 17% N=3 28% N=5 39% N=7 17% N=3 39% N=7 17% N=3 17% N=3 89 96 Please also rate each of the following in the Moorpark community. Availability of affordable quality food Good Fair Poor Availability of affordable quality health care Good Fair Poor Availability of preventive health services Good Fair Poor Availability of affordable quality mental health care Good Fair Poor Opportunities to attend cultural/arts/music activities Good Fair Poor Community support for the arts Excellent Good Fair Poor Availability of affordable quality childcare/preschool Good Fair Poor K-12 education Excellent Good Fair Poor Adult educational opportunities Excellent Good Fair Poor Sense of civic/community pride Excellent Good Fair Poor 28% N=5 39% N=7 27% N=4 33% N=5 40% N=6 27% N=4 40% N=6 33% N=5 56% N=5 33% N=3 11% N=1 38% N=6 25% N=4 38% N=6 29% N=4 36% N=5 29% N=4 7% N=1 22% N=2 44% N=4 33% N=3 7% N=1 27% N=4 53% N=8 13% N=2 27% N=3 36% N=4 27% N=3 9% N=1 11% N=2 28% N=5 39% N=7 22% N=4 90 97 Please also rate each of the following in the Moorpark community. Sense of civic/community pride Fair Poor Neighborliness of residents in Moorpark Excellent Good Fair Poor Opportunities to participate in social events and activities Excellent Good Fair Poor Opportunities to attend special events and festivals Excellent Good Fair Poor Opportunities to volunteer Excellent Good Fair Poor Opportunities to participate in community matters Excellent Good Fair Poor Openness and acceptance of the community toward people of diverse backgrounds Excellent Good Fair Poor Please indicate whether or not you have done each of the following in the last 12 months. Contacted the City of Moorpark (in-person, phone, email, or web) for help or information No Yes Contacted Moorpark elected officials (in-person, phone, email, or web) to express your opinion No Yes Attended a local public meeting (of local elected officials like City Council or County Commissioners, advisory boards, town halls, HOA, neighborhood w.. No Yes Watched (online or on television) a local public meeting No Yes 11% N=2 17% N=3 17% N=3 44% N=8 22% N=4 28% N=5 17% N=3 50% N=9 6% N=1 28% N=5 22% N=4 44% N=8 6% N=1 20% N=3 20% N=3 47% N=7 13% N=2 13% N=2 40% N=6 33% N=5 13% N=2 18% N=3 18% N=3 47% N=8 18% N=3 61% N=11 39% N=7 33% N=6 67% N=12 41% N=7 59% N=10 33% N=6 67% N=12 91 98 Please indicate whether or not you have done each of the following in the last 12 months. Watched (online or on television) a local public meeting No Yes Volunteered your time to some group/activity in Moorpark No Yes Campaigned or advocated for a local issue, cause, or candidate No Yes Voted in your most recent local election Yes Used bus, rail, subway, or other public transportation instead of driving No Yes Carpooled with other adults or children instead of driving alone No Yes Walked or biked instead of driving No Yes Please rate the quality of each of the following services in Moorpark. Public information services Good Fair Poor Economic development Good Fair Poor Traffic enforcement Good Fair Poor Traffic signal timing Good Fair Poor Street repair Good Fair Poor Street cleaning Excellent Good Fair Poor Street lighting Excellent Good 33% N=6 39% N=7 61% N=11 33% N=6 67% N=12 100% N=18 17% N=3 83% N=15 53% N=9 47% N=8 76% N=13 24% N=4 29% N=5 18% N=3 53% N=9 60% N=9 20% N=3 20% N=3 24% N=4 12% N=2 65% N=11 22% N=4 33% N=6 44% N=8 28% N=5 33% N=6 39% N=7 6% N=1 11% N=2 61% N=11 22% N=4 67% N=12 11% N=2 92 99 Please rate the quality of each of the following services in Moorpark. Street lighting Excellent Good Fair Poor Sidewalk maintenance Excellent Good Fair Poor Bus or transit services Good Fair Poor Land use, planning, and zoning Good Fair Poor Code enforcement (weeds, abandoned buildings, etc.) Good Fair Poor Affordable high-speed internet access Excellent Good Fair Poor Garbage collection Excellent Good Fair Drinking water Excellent Good Fair Poor Sewer services Excellent Good Fair Storm water management (storm drainage, dams, levees, etc.) Excellent Good Fair 6% N=1 17% N=3 67% N=12 11% N=2 28% N=5 50% N=9 11% N=2 17% N=2 42% N=5 42% N=5 47% N=7 20% N=3 33% N=5 33% N=5 27% N=4 40% N=6 28% N=5 33% N=6 33% N=6 6% N=1 28% N=5 50% N=9 22% N=4 11% N=2 33% N=6 33% N=6 22% N=4 35% N=6 41% N=7 24% N=4 17% N=3 50% N=9 28% N=5 93 100 Please rate the quality of each of the following services in Moorpark. Storm water management (storm drainage, dams, levees, etc.) Good Fair Poor Power (electric and/or gas) utility Excellent Good Fair Poor Utility billing Excellent Good Fair Poor Police/Sheriff services Excellent Good Fair Poor Crime prevention Excellent Good Fair Poor Animal control Excellent Good Fair Poor Ambulance or emergency medical services Excellent Good Fair Poor Fire services Excellent Good Fair Fire prevention and education Excellent Good Fair Poor 6% N=1 17% N=3 39% N=7 17% N=3 22% N=4 22% N=4 28% N=5 33% N=6 22% N=4 17% N=3 6% N=1 12% N=2 41% N=7 41% N=7 6% N=1 12% N=2 53% N=9 29% N=5 20% N=3 7% N=1 53% N=8 20% N=3 9% N=1 18% N=2 45% N=5 27% N=3 8% N=1 46% N=6 46% N=6 23% N=3 8% N=1 46% N=6 23% N=3 94 101 Please rate the quality of each of the following services in Moorpark. Fire prevention and education Fair Poor Emergency preparedness (services that prepare the community for natural disasters or other emergency situations) Excellent Good Fair Poor Preservation of natural areas (open space, farmlands, and greenbelts) Excellent Good Fair Poor Moorpark open space Excellent Good Fair Poor Recycling Excellent Good Fair Poor Yard waste pick-up Excellent Good Fair Poor City parks Excellent Good Fair Recreation programs or classes Excellent Good Fair Poor Recreation centers or facilities Excellent Good Fair Poor Excellent 23% N=3 25% N=3 25% N=3 33% N=4 17% N=2 12% N=2 18% N=3 59% N=10 12% N=2 6% N=1 29% N=5 47% N=8 18% N=3 25% N=4 19% N=3 50% N=8 6% N=1 6% N=1 18% N=3 53% N=9 24% N=4 28% N=5 50% N=9 22% N=4 19% N=3 13% N=2 56% N=9 13% N=2 18% N=3 18% N=3 53% N=9 12% N=2 95 102 Please rate the quality of each of the following services in Moorpark. Recreation centers or facilities Poor Health services Excellent Good Fair Poor Public library services Excellent Good Fair Poor Overall customer service by Moorpark employees (police, receptionists, planners, etc.) Excellent Good Fair Poor Please rate the following categories of Moorpark government performance. The value of services for the taxes paid to Moorpark Good Fair Poor The overall direction that Moorpark is taking Good Fair Poor The job Moorpark government does at welcoming resident involvement Good Fair Poor Overall confidence in Moorpark government Good Fair Poor Generally acting in the best interest of the community Good Fair Poor Being honest Good Fair Poor Being open and transparent to the public Good Fair Poor 31% N=4 31% N=4 31% N=4 8% N=1 20% N=3 27% N=4 47% N=7 7% N=1 6% N=1 31% N=5 44% N=7 19% N=3 29% N=5 29% N=5 41% N=7 19% N=3 63% N=10 19% N=3 27% N=4 47% N=7 27% N=4 29% N=5 29% N=5 41% N=7 29% N=5 35% N=6 35% N=6 29% N=4 21% N=3 50% N=7 29% N=4 29% N=4 43% N=6 96 103 Please rate the following categories of Moorpark government performance. Being open and transparent to the public Fair Poor Informing residents about issues facing the community Good Fair Poor Treating all residents fairly Good Fair Poor Treating residents with respect Good Fair Poor Overall, how would you rate the quality of the services provided by each of the following? The City of Moorpark Excellent Good Fair Poor The Federal Government Good Fair Poor Please rate how important, if at all, you think it is for the Moorpark community to focus on each of the following in the coming two years. Overall economic health of Moorpark Essential Very important Overall quality of the transportation system (auto, bicycle, foot, bus) in Moorpark Essential Very important Somewhat important Overall design or layout of Moorpark's residential and commercial areas (e.g., homes, buildings, streets, parks, etc.) Essential Very important Overall quality of the utility infrastructure in Moorpark (water, sewer, storm water, electric/gas, broadband) Essential Very important Overall feeling of safety in Moorpark Essential Very important Somewhat important Not at all important Overall quality of natural environment in Moorpark Essential Very important Somewhat important 29% N=4 41% N=7 24% N=4 35% N=6 27% N=4 27% N=4 47% N=7 25% N=4 19% N=3 56% N=9 17% N=3 33% N=6 39% N=7 11% N=2 25% N=4 38% N=6 38% N=6 17% N=3 83% N=15 22% N=4 39% N=7 39% N=7 44% N=8 56% N=10 17% N=3 83% N=15 6% N=1 11% N=2 6% N=1 78% N=14 11% N=2 44% N=8 39% N=7 97 104 Please rate how important, if at all, you think it is for the Moorpark community to focus on each of the following in the coming two years. Overall quality of natural environment in Moorpark Very important Somewhat important Not at all important Overall quality of parks and recreation opportunities Essential Very important Somewhat important Not at all important Overall health and wellness opportunities in Moorpark Essential Very important Somewhat important Overall opportunities for education, culture, and the arts Essential Very important Somewhat important Residents' connection and engagement with their community Essential Very important Somewhat important Please rate how much of a priority, if at all, you think it is for Moorpark to invest in the following parks and recreation facilities and amenities if additional city funding is available. Community pool High priority Medium priority Low priority Not a priority Splash pads High priority Medium priority Low priority Not a priority Disc golf course High priority Medium priority Low priority Not a priority Additional dog parks High priority Medium priority Low priority Not a priority Additional open spaces for passive uses (hiking, etc.)High priority Medium priority 6% N=1 11% N=2 6% N=1 11% N=2 50% N=9 33% N=6 28% N=5 50% N=9 22% N=4 28% N=5 33% N=6 39% N=7 22% N=4 50% N=9 28% N=5 17% N=3 11% N=2 28% N=5 44% N=8 33% N=6 22% N=4 33% N=6 11% N=2 39% N=7 44% N=8 11% N=2 6% N=1 28% N=5 33% N=6 28% N=5 11% N=2 39% N=7 39% N=7 98 105 Please rate how much of a priority, if at all, you think it is for Moorpark to invest in the following parks and recreation facilities and amenities if additional city funding is available. Additional open spaces for passive uses (hiking, etc.) High priority Medium priority Low priority Not a priority Additional trails and bicycle paths High priority Medium priority Low priority Additional soccer/multi-use fields Medium priority Low priority Not a priority Additional baseball/softball fields High priority Medium priority Low priority Not a priority Additional sports field lighting High priority Medium priority Low priority Not a priority Additional pickleball courts Medium priority Low priority Not a priority Sand volleyball courts Medium priority Low priority Not a priority Expansion of the recreation center & gym, including a teen center High priority Medium priority Low priority Not a priority Additional recreation programs High priority Medium priority Low priority Not a priority Please rate how important, if at all, you think it is for Moorpark to attract providers of each of the following mental health services.providers of each of the following mental health services. Psychiatric services Essential Very important 6% N=1 17% N=3 39% N=7 24% N=4 24% N=4 53% N=9 17% N=3 50% N=9 33% N=6 17% N=3 50% N=9 28% N=5 6% N=1 17% N=3 39% N=7 39% N=7 6% N=1 33% N=6 28% N=5 39% N=7 39% N=7 50% N=9 11% N=2 12% N=2 12% N=2 65% N=11 12% N=2 11% N=2 6% N=1 72% N=13 11% N=2 21% N=3 50% N=7 99 106 Please rate how important, if at all, you think it is for Moorpark to attract providers of each of the following mental health services. Psychiatric services Essential Very important Somewhat important Not at all important Psychological testing Essential Very important Somewhat important Not at all important Individual or group therapy Essential Very important Somewhat important Not at all important Crisis intervention Essential Very important Somewhat important Not at all important Suicide prevention Essential Very important Somewhat important Not at all important Medication services Essential Very important Somewhat important Rehabilitation services Essential Very important Somewhat important Case management services Essential Very important Somewhat important Please indicate which of the following, if any, you believe is the single biggest barrier to accessing mental health services in Moorpark. (Select only one option.) Cost of services Insurance coverage Limited availability of services Lack of information Social/societal stigma 7% N=1 21% N=3 21% N=3 7% N=1 29% N=4 36% N=5 29% N=4 7% N=1 20% N=3 40% N=6 33% N=5 7% N=1 20% N=3 40% N=6 33% N=5 7% N=1 27% N=4 33% N=5 33% N=5 40% N=6 33% N=5 27% N=4 47% N=7 40% N=6 13% N=2 21% N=3 64% N=9 14% N=2 6% N=1 6% N=1 6% N=1 24% N=4 24% N=4 100 107 Please indicate which of the following, if any, you believe is the single biggest barrier to accessing mental health services in Moorpark. (Select only one option.) Lack of information Social/societal stigma Quality of services Proximity to the city None of these/Don't know In general, how many times do you:Access the internet from your home using a compu..Several times a day Access the internet from your cell phone Several times a day Less often or never Visit social media sites such as Facebook, Twitter, Nextdoor, etc. Several times a day Once a day A few times a week Less often or never Use or check email Several times a day Once a day Every few weeks Share your opinions online Several times a day A few times a week Every few weeks Less often or never Shop online Several times a day A few times a week Every few weeks Please rate your overall health.Excellent Very good Good What impact, if any, do you think the economy will have on your family income in the next 6 months? Do you think the impact will be: Somewhat positive Neutral Somewhat negative How many years have you lived in Moorpark?2-5 years 6-10 years 11-20 years More than 20 years Which best describes the building you live in?One family house detached from any other houses Building with two or more homes (duplex, townhome, apa.. 24% N=4 6% N=1 6% N=1 6% N=1 100% N=18 6% N=1 94% N=17 11% N=2 6% N=1 11% N=2 72% N=13 6% N=1 6% N=1 89% N=16 50% N=9 6% N=1 22% N=4 22% N=4 22% N=4 28% N=5 50% N=9 17% N=3 22% N=4 61% N=11 33% N=6 44% N=8 22% N=4 44% N=8 22% N=4 17% N=3 17% N=3 6% N=1 94% N=17 101 108 Which best describes the building you live in? One family house detached from any other houses Building with two or more homes (duplex, townhome, apa.. Do you rent or own your home?Rent Own About how much is your monthly housing cost for the place you live (including rent, mortgage payment, property tax, property insurance, and homeowners' association (HOA) fees)? $500 to $999 $1,000 to $1,499 $1,500 to $1,999 $2,000 to $2,499 $2,500 to $2,999 $3,000 to $3,499 $3,500 or more Do any children 17 or under live in your household?No Yes Are you or any other members of your household aged 65 or older? No Yes How much do you anticipate your household's total income before taxes will be for the current year? (Please include in your total income money from all sources for all persons living in your household.) Less than $25,000 $25,000 to $49,999 $75,000 to $99,999 $100,000 to $149,999 $150,000 or more Are you Spanish, Hispanic, or Latino?No, not Spanish, Hispanic, or Latino Yes, I consider myself to be Spanish, Hispanic, or Latino What is your race? (Mark one or more races to indicate what race you consider yourself to be.) Asian, Asian Indian, or Pacific Islander Black or African American White Other In which category is your age?25-34 years 35-44 years 45-54 years 55-64 years 65-74 years 75 years or older What is your gender?Woman Man 6% N=1 94% N=17 6% N=1 39% N=7 11% N=2 6% N=1 17% N=3 11% N=2 11% N=2 6% N=1 39% N=7 61% N=11 28% N=5 72% N=13 78% N=14 6% N=1 6% N=1 6% N=1 6% N=1 17% N=3 83% N=15 17% N=3 72% N=13 11% N=2 11% N=2 6% N=1 17% N=3 39% N=7 17% N=3 11% N=2 11% N=2 61% N=11 39% N=7 102 109 What is your gender? Woman Man How did you hear about this survey? (Select all that apply.) The City's website The City's social media (Facebook, Twitter, Instagram,.. Received an email from the City Received a postcard or letter from the City Polco's weekly email 61% N=11 6% N=1 6% N=1 78% N=14 11% N=2 6% N=1 103 110 Th e N a t i o n a l C o m m u n i t y S u r v e y ™ • © 2 0 0 1 -20 2 2 Na t i o n a l R e s e a r c h C e n t e r , I n c . The City of Moorpark 2022 Community Survey Page 1 of 5 Please complete this survey if you are the adult (age 18 or older) in the household who most recently had a birthday (the year of birth does not matter). Your responses are confidential and no identifying information will be shared. 1. Please rate each of the following aspects of quality of life in Moorpark. Excellent Good Fair Poor Don’t know Moorpark as a place to live .................................................................................................. 1 2 3 4 5 Your neighborhood as a place to live .............................................................................. 1 2 3 4 5 Moorpark as a place to raise children ............................................................................. 1 2 3 4 5 Moorpark as a place to work............................................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 Moorpark as a place to visit................................................................................................. 1 2 3 4 5 Moorpark as a place to retire .............................................................................................. 1 2 3 4 5 The overall quality of life in Moorpark ........................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 Sense of community ................................................................................................................ 1 2 3 4 5 2. Please rate each of the following characteristics as they relate to Moorpark as a whole. Excellent Good Fair Poor Don’t know Overall economic health of Moorpark ............................................................................ 1 2 3 4 5 Overall quality of the transportation system (auto, bicycle, foot, bus) in Moorpark ........................................................................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 Overall design or layout of Moorpark’s residential and commercial areas (e.g., homes, buildings, streets, parks, etc.) ................................................. 1 2 3 4 5 Overall quality of the utility infrastructure in Moorpark (water, sewer, storm water, electric/gas, broadband) ........................................ 1 2 3 4 5 Overall feeling of safety in Moorpark .............................................................................. 1 2 3 4 5 Overall quality of natural environment in Moorpark ............................................... 1 2 3 4 5 Overall quality of parks and recreation opportunities ............................................ 1 2 3 4 5 Overall health and wellness opportunities in Moorpark ........................................ 1 2 3 4 5 Overall opportunities for education, culture, and the arts..................................... 1 2 3 4 5 Residents’ connection and engagement with their community .......................... 1 2 3 4 5 3. Please indicate how likely or unlikely you are to do each of the following. Very Somewhat Somewhat Very Don’t likely likely unlikely unlikely know Recommend living in Moorpark to someone who asks.....................1 2 3 4 5 Remain in Moorpark for the next five years...........................................1 2 3 4 5 4. Please rate how safe or unsafe you feel: Very Somewhat Neither safe Somewhat Very Don’t safe safe nor unsafe unsafe unsafe know In your neighborhood during the day ...................................... 1 2 3 4 5 6 In Moorpark’s downtown/commercial area during the day ............................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 6 From property crime ....................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 6 From violent crime ........................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 6 From fire, flood, or other natural disaster ............................. 1 2 3 4 5 6 5. Please rate the job you feel the Moorpark community does at each of the following. Excellent Good Fair Poor Don’t know Making all residents feel welcome ................................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 Attracting people from diverse backgrounds .............................................................. 1 2 3 4 5 Valuing/respecting residents from diverse backgrounds ...................................... 1 2 3 4 5 Taking care of vulnerable residents (elderly, disabled, homeless, etc.) ........... 1 2 3 4 5 6. Please rate each of the following in the Moorpark community. Excellent Good Fair Poor Don’t know Overall quality of business and service establishments in Moorpark .............. 1 2 3 4 5 Variety of business and service establishments in Moorpark .............................. 1 2 3 4 5 Vibrancy of downtown/commercial area ..................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 Employment opportunities ................................................................................................. 1 2 3 4 5 Shopping opportunities ........................................................................................................ 1 2 3 4 5 Cost of living in Moorpark .................................................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 Overall image or reputation of Moorpark ..................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 104 111 Th e N a t i o n a l C o m m u n i t y S u r v e y ™ • © 2 0 0 1 -20 2 2 Na t i o n a l R e s e a r c h C e n t e r , I n c . Page 2 of 5 7. Please also rate each of the following in the Moorpark community. Excellent Good Fair Poor Don’t know Traffic flow on major streets ............................................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 Ease of public parking ............................................................................................................ 1 2 3 4 5 Ease of travel by car in Moorpark ..................................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 Ease of travel by public transportation in Moorpark ............................................... 1 2 3 4 5 Ease of travel by bicycle in Moorpark ............................................................................. 1 2 3 4 5 Ease of walking in Moorpark .............................................................................................. 1 2 3 4 5 Well-planned residential growth ...................................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 Well-planned commercial growth .................................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 Well-designed neighborhoods ........................................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 Preservation of the historical or cultural character of the community ............ 1 2 3 4 5 Public places where people want to spend time ........................................................ 1 2 3 4 5 Variety of housing options ................................................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 Availability of affordable quality housing ..................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 Overall quality of new development in Moorpark ..................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 Overall appearance of Moorpark ...................................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 Cleanliness of Moorpark ....................................................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 Water resources (beaches, lakes, ponds, riverways, etc.) ..................................... 1 2 3 4 5 Air quality .................................................................................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 Availability of paths and walking trails .......................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 Fitness opportunities (including exercise classes and paths or trails, etc.) ... 1 2 3 4 5 Recreational opportunities .................................................................................................. 1 2 3 4 5 Availability of affordable quality food ............................................................................ 1 2 3 4 5 Availability of affordable quality health care ............................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 Availability of preventive health services ..................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 Availability of affordable quality mental health care ............................................... 1 2 3 4 5 Opportunities to attend cultural/arts/music activities .......................................... 1 2 3 4 5 Community support for the arts ........................................................................................ 1 2 3 4 5 Availability of affordable quality childcare/preschool ............................................ 1 2 3 4 5 K-12 education .......................................................................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 Adult educational opportunities ....................................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 Sense of civic/community pride ........................................................................................ 1 2 3 4 5 Neighborliness of residents in Moorpark ...................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 Opportunities to participate in social events and activities .................................. 1 2 3 4 5 Opportunities to attend special events and festivals ............................................... 1 2 3 4 5 Opportunities to volunteer .................................................................................................. 1 2 3 4 5 Opportunities to participate in community matters ................................................ 1 2 3 4 5 Openness and acceptance of the community toward people of diverse backgrounds ..................................................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 8. Please indicate whether or not you have done each of the following in the last 12 months. No Yes Contacted the City of Moorpark (in-person, phone, email, or web) for help or information ........................... 1 2 Contacted Moorpark elected officials (in-person, phone, email, or web) to express your opinion .............. 1 2 Attended a local public meeting (of local elected officials like City Council or County Commissioners, advisory boards, town halls, HOA, neighborhood watch, etc.) ............................................ 1 2 Watched (online or on television) a local public meeting ............................................................................................... 1 2 Volunteered your time to some group/activity in Moorpark ........................................................................................ 1 2 Campaigned or advocated for a local issue, cause, or candidate .................................................................................. 1 2 Voted in your most recent local election ................................................................................................................................ 1 2 Used bus, rail, subway, or other public transportation instead of driving ............................................................... 1 2 Carpooled with other adults or children instead of driving alone .............................................................................. 1 2 Walked or biked instead of driving ........................................................................................................................................... 1 2 105 112 Th e N a t i o n a l C o m m u n i t y S u r v e y ™ • © 2 0 0 1 -20 2 2 Na t i o n a l R e s e a r c h C e n t e r , I n c . The City of Moorpark 2022 Community Survey Page 3 of 5 9. Please rate the quality of each of the following services in Moorpark. Excellent Good Fair Poor Don’t know Public information services ............................................................................................. 1 2 3 4 5 Economic development ..................................................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 Traffic enforcement ............................................................................................................ 1 2 3 4 5 Traffic signal timing ............................................................................................................ 1 2 3 4 5 Street repair ........................................................................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 Street cleaning ....................................................................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 Street lighting ........................................................................................................................ 1 2 3 4 5 Sidewalk maintenance ....................................................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 Bus or transit services ....................................................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 Land use, planning, and zoning ...................................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 Code enforcement (weeds, abandoned buildings, etc.) ...................................... 1 2 3 4 5 Affordable high-speed internet access ....................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 Garbage collection ............................................................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 Drinking water ...................................................................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 Sewer services ....................................................................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 Storm water management (storm drainage, dams, levees, etc.) .................... 1 2 3 4 5 Power (electric and/or gas) utility ............................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 Utility billing .......................................................................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 Police/Sheriff services ....................................................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 Crime prevention ................................................................................................................. 1 2 3 4 5 Animal control ....................................................................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 Ambulance or emergency medical services ............................................................. 1 2 3 4 5 Fire services ........................................................................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 Fire prevention and education ....................................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 Emergency preparedness (services that prepare the community for natural disasters or other emergency situations) ..................................... 1 2 3 4 5 Preservation of natural areas (open space, farmlands, and greenbelts) ..... 1 2 3 4 5 Moorpark open space ......................................................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 Recycling .................................................................................................................................. 1 2 3 4 5 Yard waste pick-up.............................................................................................................. 1 2 3 4 5 City parks................................................................................................................................. 1 2 3 4 5 Recreation programs or classes .................................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 Recreation centers or facilities ...................................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 Health services ...................................................................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 Public library services ....................................................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 Overall customer service by Moorpark employees (police, receptionists, planners, etc.) ..................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 10. Please rate the following categories of Moorpark government performance. Excellent Good Fair Poor Don’t know The value of services for the taxes paid to Moorpark .......................................... 1 2 3 4 5 The overall direction that Moorpark is taking ........................................................ 1 2 3 4 5 The job Moorpark government does at welcoming resident involvement ....... 1 2 3 4 5 Overall confidence in Moorpark government.......................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 Generally acting in the best interest of the community ...................................... 1 2 3 4 5 Being honest ........................................................................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 Being open and transparent to the public ................................................................. 1 2 3 4 5 Informing residents about issues facing the community ................................... 1 2 3 4 5 Treating all residents fairly ............................................................................................. 1 2 3 4 5 Treating residents with respect .................................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 11. Overall, how would you rate the quality of the services provided by each of the following? Excellent Good Fair Poor Don’t know The City of Moorpark ......................................................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 The Federal Government .................................................................................................. 1 2 3 4 5 106 113 Th e N a t i o n a l C o m m u n i t y S u r v e y ™ • © 2 0 0 1 -20 2 2 Na t i o n a l R e s e a r c h C e n t e r , I n c . Page 4 of 5 12. Please rate how important, if at all, you think it is for the Moorpark community to focus on each of the following in the coming two years. Very Somewhat Not at all Essential important important important Overall economic health of Moorpark ...............................................................................1 2 3 4 Overall quality of the transportation system (auto, bicycle, foot, bus) in Moorpark ..............................................................................................................................1 2 3 4 Overall design or layout of Moorpark’s residential and commercial areas (e.g., homes, buildings, streets, parks, etc.) .....................................................1 2 3 4 Overall quality of the utility infrastructure in Moorpark (water, sewer, storm water, electric/gas, broadband) ..........................................1 2 3 4 Overall feeling of safety in Moorpark .................................................................................1 2 3 4 Overall quality of natural environment in Moorpark ..................................................1 2 3 4 Overall quality of parks and recreation opportunities ...............................................1 2 3 4 Overall health and wellness opportunities in Moorpark ...........................................1 2 3 4 Overall opportunities for education, culture, and the arts........................................1 2 3 4 Residents’ connection and engagement with their community .............................1 2 3 4 13. Please rate how much of a priority, if at all, you think it is for Moorpark to invest in the following parks and recreation facilities and amenities if additional city funding is available. High Medium Low Not a priority priority priority priority Community pool ......................................................................................................... 1 2 3 4 Splash pads ................................................................................................................. 1 2 3 4 Disc golf course .......................................................................................................... 1 2 3 4 Additional dog parks .................................................................................................. 1 2 3 4 Additional open spaces for passive uses (hiking, etc.) ............................................ 1 2 3 4 Additional trails and bicycle paths ........................................................................... 1 2 3 4 Additional soccer/multi-use fields ........................................................................... 1 2 3 4 Additional baseball/softball fields ............................................................................ 1 2 3 4 Additional sports field lighting ................................................................................. 1 2 3 4 Additional pickleball courts ...................................................................................... 1 2 3 4 Sand volleyball courts ................................................................................................ 1 2 3 4 Expansion of the recreation center & gym, including a teen center ...................... 1 2 3 4 Additional recreation programs ............................................................................... 1 2 3 4 14. Please rate how important, if at all, you think it is for Moorpark to attract providers of each of the following mental health services. Very Somewhat Not at all Don’t Essential important important important know Psychiatric services ............................................................................................. 1 2 3 4 5 Psychological testing .......................................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 Individual or group therapy ............................................................................ 1 2 3 4 5 Crisis intervention ............................................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 Suicide prevention............................................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 Medication services ............................................................................................ 1 2 3 4 5 Rehabilitation services ...................................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 Case management services .............................................................................. 1 2 3 4 5 15. Please indicate which of the following, if any, you believe is the single biggest barrier to accessing mental health services in Moorpark. (Select only one option.)  Cost of services  Hours of operation  Insurance coverage  Proximity to the city  Limited availability of services  Lack of transportation to/from services  Lack of information  Language barriers  Social/societal stigma  Other unlisted barrier  Quality of services  None of these/Don’t know 107 114 Th e N a t i o n a l C o m m u n i t y S u r v e y ™ • © 2 0 0 1 -20 2 2 Na t i o n a l R e s e a r c h C e n t e r , I n c . The City of Moorpark 2022 Community Survey Page 5 of 5 Our last questions are about you and your household. Again, all of your responses to this survey are confidential and no identifying information will be shared. D1. In general, how many times do you: Several Once A few times Every Less often Don’t times a day a day a week few weeks or never know Access the internet from your home using a computer, laptop, or tablet computer ......................1 2 3 4 5 6 Access the internet from your cell phone .......................1 2 3 4 5 6 Visit social media sites such as Facebook, Twitter, Nextdoor, etc. .......................................................1 2 3 4 5 6 Use or check email ....................................................................1 2 3 4 5 6 Share your opinions online ...................................................1 2 3 4 5 6 Shop online ..................................................................................1 2 3 4 5 6 D2. Please rate your overall health.  Excellent  Very good  Good  Fair  Poor D3. What impact, if any, do you think the economy will have on your family income in the next 6 months? Do you think the impact will be:  Very positive  Somewhat positive  Neutral  Somewhat negative  Very negative D4. How many years have you lived in Moorpark?  Less than 2 years  2-5 years  6-10 years  11-20 years  More than 20 years D5. Which best describes the building you live in?  One family house detached from any other houses  Building with two or more homes (duplex, townhome, apartment, or condominium)  Mobile home  Other D6. Do you rent or own your home?  Rent  Own D7. About how much is your monthly housing cost for the place you live (including rent, mortgage payment, property tax, property insurance, and homeowners’ association (HOA) fees)?  Less than $500  $2,000 to $2,499  $500 to $999  $2,500 to $2,999  $1,000 to $1,499  $3,000 to $3,499  $1,500 to $1,999  $3,500 or more D8. Do any children 17 or under live in your household?  No  Yes D9. Are you or any other members of your household aged 65 or older?  No  Yes D10. How much do you anticipate your household’s total income before taxes will be for the current year? (Please include in your total income money from all sources for all persons living in your household.)  Less than $25,000  $75,000 to $99,999  $25,000 to $49,999  $100,000 to $149,999  $50,000 to $74,999  $150,000 or more D11. Are you Spanish, Hispanic or Latino?  No, not Spanish, Hispanic, or Latino  Yes, I consider myself to be Spanish, Hispanic, or Latino D12. What is your race? (Mark one or more races to indicate what race you consider yourself to be.)  American Indian or Alaskan Native  Asian, Asian Indian, or Pacific Islander  Black or African American  White  Other D13. In which category is your age?  18-24 years  55-64 years  25-34 years  65-74 years  35-44 years  75 years or older  45-54 years D14. What is your gender?  Woman  Man  Identify in another way  go to D14a D14a. If you identify in another way, how would you describe your gender?  Agender/I don’t identify with any gender  Genderqueer/gender fluid  Non-binary  Transgender man  Transgender woman  Two-spirit  Not listed, I identify as:______________________________ Thank you! Please return the completed survey in the postage-paid envelope to: National Research Center, Inc., PO Box 549, Belle Mead, NJ 08502 108 115