HomeMy WebLinkAboutRES CC 2023 4196 2023 0719 RESOLUTION NO. 2023-4196
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A
DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY, ADOPTING
A CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM AS PART OF THE
NEXUS STUDY, UPDATING AND ESTABLISHING THE FEE
AMOUNTS FOR THE CITY'S DEVELOPMENT IMPACT
FEES, AND MAKING DETERMINATIONS UNDER CEQA
WHEREAS, the Mitigation Fee Act contained in Government Code 66000 et seq.,
permits the City to impose development impact fees on new development for the
purposes of funding public facilities necessary to serve that new development; and
WHEREAS, the City desires to update and expand on the existing impact fees on
new development to fund the costs associated with increased demand for public facilities
throughout the City; and
WHEREAS, proposed Ordinance No. 517, once adopted, will amend Chapter 3.36
("Development Impact Fees") of the Municipal Code, which establishes the City's program
and requirements for the imposition of development impact fees on development projects
and will provide that the City Council shall, by resolution, adopt a schedule setting forth
the specific amount of development impact fees that will be levied on upon new
development in the City for each category of fee; and
WHEREAS, Harris & Associates, Inc. has prepared the Development Impact Fee
Nexus Study dated July 2023, included as Exhibit A ("Nexus Study"); and
WHEREAS, the Nexus Study identifies the purpose of each fee, the use to which
each fee will be put, demonstrates a reasonable relationship between the each fee's use
and the type of development project on which the fee will be imposed and provides how
there is a reasonable relationship between the amount of each fee and the cost of the
public facility or portion of the public facility attributable to the development on which each
fee is imposed. In addition, the Nexus Study identified capital projects necessary to meet
the goals, programs, and objectives within the City's General Plan; and
WHEREAS, the Nexus Study evaluated project development growth in the City
consistent with the Moorpark General Plan 2050's Buildout Methodology for calculating
development capacity for fire protection, police, general city, parkland and park, based
on the City's newly adopted General Plan, adopted specific plans and other development
approvals, and provides the basis for calculating and adopting development impact fees
in the following categories: (1) library, (2) parks and recreation, (3) city hall improvement,
(4) police facilities, and (5) citywide transportation; and
WHEREAS, the Nexus Study provides the documentation, detail, and other
information required by the Mitigation Fee Act as the basis for the adoption and imposition
of the development impact fees for library, parks and recreation, city hall improvement,
police facilities, and citywide transportation; and
Resolution No. 2023-4196
Page 2
WHEREAS, pursuant to the Mitigation Fee Act, the City Council finds that there is
a reasonable relationship between the need for parks and recreation facilities because
future residential development will increase the City's population and will require
additional park and recreational facilities to adequately serve the athletic and recreational
needs of these new residents. The need to collect fees on new residential construction
to mitigate the impact on park and recreation facilities and to fund park and recreation
facility development costs, is separate from, and in addition to, the fees and costs to
acquire land to be used for park purposes, which fees and costs for land acquisition are
provided by the City's Quimby Act Ordinance as provided in Chapter 16.44 of the
Moorpark Municipal Code; and
WHEREAS, with respect to fees for library, city hall improvement, police facilities
and citywide transportation, the facts and evidence presented to the City Council have
established that there is a reasonable relationship between the need for new facilities or
improvements and the impacts of new development for which a corresponding fee is
charged, and also that there is a reasonable relationship between the fees' use and the
type of development for which the fee is imposed; and
WHEREAS, the City has complied with the notice and hearing requirements of
state law and the Mitigation Fee Act prior to adopting this Resolution, and a notice of
public hearing on the development impact fees was mailed as required by law to any
interested party who filed a written request with the City Clerk for mailed notice of a
meeting on new or increased fees; and
WHEREAS, the City Council held a duly noticed public hearing at the June 7, 2023
Regular Council meeting and continued the hearing to a date certain, July 19, 2023, at
which time further testimony was presented and the public hearing was closed; and
WHEREAS, the City Council finds that the record of these proceedings, including
the Nexus Study, the City's General Plan, ordinances and resolutions, the staff report,
written correspondence received by the City, and the testimony received at the hearing
prior to the adoption of this Resolution, held on July 19, 2023, contains substantial
evidence to support the imposition and collection of the development impact fees
established herein; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed and considered the development
impact fees established herein, and finds that the fees will mitigate some of the impacts
associated with additional capital and infrastructure needs necessitated by new
residential and non-residential development in the City.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK DOES
HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. RECITALS. The findings and recitals set forth in this Resolution are
true and correct, and are incorporated herein.
SECTION 2. CEQA. The approval of the Nexus Study, Capital Improvement Plan
associated with the Nexus Study, and the adoption of the DIFs specified in this
Resolution No. 2023-4196
Page 3
Resolution, was reviewed in accordance with the criteria contained in the California
Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") and the State CEQA Guidelines. The City Council
finds that approval of the Nexus Study and the adoption of the DIFs specified in this
Resolution will not have a significant impact on the environment and are exempt from
CEQA pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3) of State CEQA Guidelines because these actions
involve the adoption of DIFs and no specific development is authorized by the adoption
of the Nexus Study or the adoption of new DIFs. Furthermore, the Capital Improvement
Program is a prioritizing and funding allocation program and cannot and does not have
the potential to cause a significant effect on the environment. No physical activity will
occur until all required environmental review is conducted at the time the physical
improvements prioritized in the Capital Improvement Program are undertaken at a future
unspecified date. Therefore the approval of the Nexus Study, Capital Improvement Plan
associated with the Nexus Study, and adoption of the DIFs does not have the potential
for causing a significant effect on the environment. In addition, the adoption of this
Resolution approves and sets forth a procedure for determining fees for the purpose of
obtaining funds for capital projects and equipment necessary to maintain service within
existing service areas and is statutorily exempt from CEQA pursuant to State CEQA
Guidelines 15273(a)(4). Also, approval of the Capital Improvement Plan associated with
the Nexus Study, is exempt from the requirements of CEQA pursuant to State CEQA
Guidelines Section 15378(b)(4) because the Plan is not a "project" as defined by CEQA,
but involves the creation of government funding mechanisms or other government fiscal
activities that do not involve any commitment to any specific project that may result in a
potentially significant physical impact on the environment.
SECTION 3. Approval of the Nexus Study and Mitigation Fee Act Findings. The
City Council hereby approves the City of Moorpark Development Impact Fee Nexus Study
prepared by Harris & Associates, Inc. and dated May 2023, and the findings contained
therein. A copy of the Nexus Study shall be on file with the City Clerk and available during
regular City business hours for public inspection.
SECTION 4. Adoption of a Capital Improvement Program. The City Council
hereby adopts the Capital Improvement Program attached as Appendix A to the Nexus
Study, as a part of the Nexus Study.
SECTION 5. Establishing the Amount of Development Impact Fees. The City
Council hereby adopts the DIFs for (1) Library, (2) Parks and Recreation, (3) City Hall
Improvements, (4) Police Facilities, and (5) Citywide Transportation, in accordance with
the Schedule of Fees and Service Charges, attached hereto as Exhibit B and
incorporated by this reference. The Schedule of Fees and Service Charges contains the
DIFs identified above. The City Council is not readopting or revising the existing fees not
identified in this Resolution or analyzed in the Nexus Study; all such fees and charges
remain in place at the current amount.
Resolution No. 2023-4196
Page 4
SECTION 6. Adoption of Methodology for Calculation, Adjustment, and Collection
of Development Impact Fees. The City Council adopts the methodology set forth in the
Nexus Study, for calculating and collecting the DIFs adopted herein. The DIFs
established in Exhibit B shall be calculated, adjusted, and collected in accordance with
City ordinances, Chapter 3.36 of the Moorpark Municipal Code, as amended by
Ordinance No. 517, and the Nexus Study. The amount of the DIFs shall be adjusted
annually in July of each calendar year, using the Construction Cost Index (CCI) for the
Los Angeles Region as reported by Engineering News Record (ENR) for the twelve-
month period ending in May or a similar published index if the CCI Index is no longer
available.
SECTION 7. Effective Date of DIFs. The development impact fees established by
Section 5 of this Resolution shall be effective on the later of: (i) the sixtieth (60th) day
following the adoption of this Resolution or (ii) the effective date of proposed Ordinance
No. 517, an ordinance amending Chapter 3.36 ("Development Impact Fees") of the
Municipal Code and establishing the City's program and requirements for the imposition
of development impact fees on development projects.
SECTION 8. No Changes to Other City Fees. Nothing in this Resolution shall
repeal, amend or supersede any other City imposed fees except for the amount of specific
type and category of DIF addressed in the Nexus Study and expressly established by this
Resolution.
SECTION 9. Certification. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this
resolution and shall cause a certified resolution to be filed in the book of original
resolutions.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 19th day of July, 2023.
AeArx
Chris R. Eneg tirerayor
ATTEST:
Ky Spa ler, Cit lerk
oappFtit Q
O 4
<1��
` 4D
Exhibit A — Nexus Study � ,�. ��
Exhibit B — Schedule of Fees and Service Charges z'rt �'�- a
Resolution No. 2023-4196 EXHIBIT A
Page 5
Ltfe cams be tlu'sgooi=
_-
_
- y
4' ,�: may'
�! 11 iUP
4, ,
City of Moorpark
Development Impact Fee
Nexus Study
July 2023
Prepared By: 1 f-C`"` ` _ ` Y
r
Harris & Associates 9Ar, `!
Resolution No. 2023-4196
Page 6
This page intentionally left blank.
Resolution No. 2023-4196
Page 7
Table of Contents
Section 1 Executive Summary 1
Introduction 1
Nexus Study 2
Administrative Fee 4
Fee Adjustment Procedures 4
Timing of Fee Payment 5
Section 2 Legal Context and Methodology 6
Nexus Requirement Summary 6
AB6O2 6
Methodology 8
Section 3 Population and Land Use Assumptions 10
Land Use Types 10
Growth Forecasts 10
Average Unit Sizes 13
Section 4 Library Fee 15
Background 15
Current Facilities 15
Planned Facilities 15
Fee Methodology 15
Fee Summary 16
Revenue Projections 17
Nexus Requirement Summary 17
Section 5 Park & Recreation Fee 19
Background 19
Current Level of Service 20
Planned Level of Service 20
Parkland 20
Service Population 20
Fee Methodology 21
Fee Summary 22
Revenue Projections 22
Nexus Requirement Summary 23
Section 6 City Hall Improvement Fee 26
Background 26
Current Level of Service 26
Development Impact Fee Nexus Study i July 2023
City of Moorpark
Resolution No. 2023-4196
Page 8
Planned Level of Service 26
Fee Methodology 27
Fee Summary 27
Revenue Projections 28
Nexus Requirement Summary 28
Section 7 Police Facilities Fee 31
Background 31
Current Level of Service 31
Planned Level of Service 32
Fee Methodology 32
Fee Summary 33
Revenue Projections 33
Nexus Requirement Summary 34
Section 8 Citywide Transportation Fee 36
Background 36
Service Population 39
Cost Summary 39
Fee Methodology 39
Fee Summary 41
Reduced Traffic Fee 41
Revenue Projections 42
Nexus Requirement Summary 43
Section 9 Implementation and Administration 45
Implementation 45
Fee Program Administrative Requirements 45
Fee Adjustment Procedures 46
Timing of Fee Payment 46
Credits and Reimbursement Policies 46
Administrative Fee 47
Programming Revenues with the CIP 47
Fee Reporting 47
Accessory Dwelling Units 48
Specialized Development Projects 48
Rebuild or Expansion Projects 48
Appendix A Capital Improvement Program 50
Development Impact Fee Nexus Study ii July 2023
City of Moorpark
Resolution No. 2023-4196
Page 9
Tables
Table 1-1: City of Moorpark List of Development Impact Fees 3
Table 1-2: Summary of Maximum Allowable Development Impact Fees 4
Table 3-1: Existing Service Population 11
Table 3-2: Estimated Service Population at Buildout 12
Table 3-3: Estimated Buildout Projected New Growth 12
Table 3-4: Persons per Household & Employment Density 13
Table 3-5: Residential Land Use Average Unit Size 14
Table 4-1: New Library Cost and Size 15
Table 4-2: Cost per SF for Library Space 16
Table 4-3: Cost per Capita for Library Space 16
Table 4-4: Library Fee Summary 16
Table 4-5: Anticipated Library Fee Collection at Buildout 17
Table 5-1: Recreational Facility Inventory 20
Table 5-2: Park Facility Cost per Resident 21
Table 5-3: Existing Recreation Facility Level of Service 22
Table 5-4: Parks Fee Cost Summary 22
Table 5-5: Parks Fee Estimated Revenue at Buildout 23
Table 6-1: City Hall Facility Inventory & Level of Service 27
Table 6-2: City Hall Improvement Fee Summary 28
Table 6-3: Anticipated City Hall Improvement Fee Revenues at Buildout 28
Table 7-1: Existing Police Facilities Level of Service 32
Table 7-2: Police Facilities Fee 33
Table 7-3: Anticipated Police Facilities Fee Collection at Buildout 34
Table 8-1: Transportation Facilities— Planned Facilities 38
Table 8-2: Land Use Trip Generation 39
Table 8-3: New Development Trip Generation 40
Table 8-4: Cost per Trip 41
Table 8-5: Citywide Transportation Fee Summary 41
Table 8-6: Anticipated Citywide Transportation Fee Collection at Buildout 43
Development Impact Fee Nexus Study iii July 2023
City of Moorpark
Resolution No. 2023-4196
Page 10
Section 1 Executive Summary
Introduction
The City of Moorpark(City)is located in Ventura County(County),California,50 miles northwest
of Los Angeles in a valley created by the Arroyo Simi River. The City is divided by Highway 118,
known locally as Los Angeles Avenue. The City was officially incorporated on July 1, 1983. Per
the City's recently updated Housing Element, the City's most dramatic period of growth occurred
in its early years. This period saw a substantial shift in the City's center of activity, with large-
scale development in areas that had been primarily used for agriculture. High Street and the
surrounding area remained the social and retail center of Moorpark through the 198Os until
commercial activity began to shift to the south, and suburban- style, multi-tenant retail centers
grew along Los Angeles Avenue. Home construction significantly accelerated in the community
and with the incorporation of Mountain Meadows and Peach Hill, the City's built footprint
expanded from the flatlands into the surrounding hillsides. Per the City's General Plan Update
(May 3, 2023), the City's 2020 population is 36,284 and is expected to be 54,000 at Buildout of
the City.The Total future residents at Buildout used in this Nexus Study are based on future units
from the General Plan and persons per household assumptions. The total differs slightly from the
General Plan due to the persons per household factor being applied to single-family and
multifamily units for purposes of this analysis instead of the overall average of 3.2 persons per
household used in the General Plan.
The City consists primarily of single-family homes, which account for approximately 73% of the
housing stock in the City, plus rural housing and mobile homes. This is largely the result of how
the City was developed with single-family residential subdivisions throughout the City's history,
including a period of rapid suburbanization following its incorporation.Approximately 2%of the
City's housing stock is duplexes,triplexes,and quadplexes.Condominiums comprise an additional
approximate 7% and townhomes another estimated 6%. The City has five existing townhome
developments and six condominium developments, which total approximately 1,500 units. The
City has eight apartment properties providing 1,132 housing units or approximately 10% of the
City' s housing stock. Four projects are deed restricted and provide 100% affordable housing to
lower income residents. Two of the affordable housing properties are age restricted to seniors,and
both are disabled friendly. The other four apartment properties are market rate developments. At
Buildout,the City anticipates over 600 single-family units and over 4,000 multi-family units will
be constructed, including the redevelopment of vacant buildings and underutilized properties that
have the potential to be redeveloped.
The last comprehensive update of the City's General Plan was completed in 1986, followed by a
limited update in 1992. The City is currently undertaking a comprehensive update to the General
Plan (General Plan 2050), the 2021-2029 Housing Element (November 23, 2022), and the Park
Development Impact Fee Nexus Study 1 July 2023
City of Moorpark
Resolution No. 2023-4196
Page 11
and Recreation Master Plan. This Development Impact Fee Nexus Study (Nexus Study or
Analysis)is part of the comprehensive update to key planning documents.
Development Impact Fees (DIFs) are one-time fees that are applied to new development or re-
development projects for new construction to fund new development's impact on City
Infrastructure. The schedule of established fees may be amended from time to time by resolution
of the City Council. They can also be updated administratively by an annual inflation factor that
is included as part of the adopting resolution. Currently,the City's DIFs are not adjusted annually
to keep up with changes in construction costs. As a result, fee collection has not kept pace with
rising construction costs over the years, and funds collected may not be sufficient to construct the
facilities originally identified when fees were calculated.
The goal of the City is to develop a fee program that achieves the funding objectives laid out in
the General Plan, Housing Element, master plans, balances fee levels with desired economic
growth,and complies with the legal requirements of the Mitigation Fee Act(AB 1600/Government
Code Section 66000 et seq.) and Assembly Bill 602(AB6O2).
Nexus Study
Purpose
As development occurs in the City,new backbone infrastructure and capital facilities are required
to mitigate the increased demand created by new residents and workers. DIFs fund this impacted
backbone infrastructure and capital facilities as well as the related administrative costs through the
City's fee program.The fee program contains separate fee categories for each type of infrastructure
and capital facilities. Incorporated in this Nexus Study are the following fees:
• Library
• Parks and Recreation
• City Hall Improvements
• Police Facilities
• Citywide Transportation
Table 1-1 lists the fees the City currently collects and accounts for per the City of Moorpark
Development Impact Fee Annual Report("AB16OO"Report)for Fiscal Year 2021-2022.The table
below also shows which fees are included in the Nexus Study, which fees have been combined,
and which fees are excluded. The City Hall Improvements Fee included in this Nexus Study is a
new proposed fee and is not included in Table 1-1.
Development Impact Fee Nexus Study 2 July 2023
City of Moorpark
Resolution No. 2023-4196
Page 12
Table 1-1: City of Moorpark List of Development Impact Fees
Current Fees Notes
Traffic System Management Combined for new Citywide Transportation fee.
Citywide Traffic Mitigation Fee Combined for new Citywide Transportation fee.
Crossing Guard Fund No change—not an AB 1600 fee.
Library Facilities Included in Nexus Study.
Open Space Maintenance No change.Not included as it is for maintenance.
Tree and Landscape Maintenance No change.Not included as it is for maintenance.
Art in Public Places No change—not an AB 1600 fee.
Park Improvement No update to Quimby Fee. Updating Park and
Recreation Fee.
Los Angeles A.O.C. Combined for new Citywide Transportation fee.
Tierra Rejada/Spring A.O.0 Combined for new Citywide Transportation fee.
Casey/Gabbert A.O.0 Fee rescinded on 3/15/2017.
Freemont Storm Drain A.O.0 No change. Development Agreement fee.
Walnut Canyon Traffic Noise No change. Development Agreement/Area
Attenuation Specific fee.
Police Facilities Fund Included in Nexus Study.
Fire protection is provided by Ventura County Fire Protection District. On October 19, 1983 the
City Council adopted Resolution 83-47, establishing a Fire Protection Facility Fee schedule. The
City's fee schedule must match those of the Fire District. The fees were last updated on October
23, 2007 when the Fire Protection Facility Fee was approved by the Ventura County Board of
Supervisors. The City adopted an updated fee in December 2007 that was consistent with County
Fees. The Fire Protection Fee will not be updated as part of this Nexus Study since there have not
been any updates to the fee adopted by the County.
This report is designed to satisfy the AB1600 Nexus requirements, AB602 requirements, and
provide the necessary technical analysis to support the adoption of the updated fees. The fees will
be effective 60 days after the City's final action establishing and authorizing the collection of the
fees.
Results
Table 1-2 shows a summary of the maximum allowable fees for library,park and recreation, city
hall improvements, police facilities, and citywide transportation facilities. Pursuant to AB602,
Development Impact Fee Nexus Study 3 July 2023
City of Moorpark
Resolution No. 2023-4196
Page 13
residential development fees are now assessed on a per square foot basis and non-residential
development fees are assessed on a per 1,000 square foot basis. Park and Recreation Fees are not
assessed on non-residential development.
Table 1-2: Summary of Maximum Allowable Development Impact Fees
Park& Citywide
Land Use 1 Library Recreation City Hall Police Transportation
j;aidential (Fee per Building Square Foot)
Single Family $0.73 $4.71 $1.24 $0.57 $8.71
Multi-Family $1.02 $6.54 $1.72 $0.80 $9.30
Plon-Residential (Fee per 1,000 Building Square Feet)
Commercial $188 N/A $319 $147 $20,111
Office $376 N/A $637 $295 $15,377
Industrial $75 N/A $127 $59 $4,664
1 An administrative fee of 5%is included in the fees shown for(1)legal,accounting,and other administrative support and(2)
development impact fee program administration costs including revenue collection,revenue and cost accounting,mandated
public reporting,and fee justification analysis. The administration fee is calculated on a fee by fee basis.Please refer to the
individual fee calculation tables for a breakdown of the administration fee.
Administrative Fee
The City oversees the implementation and administration of the DIF Program, consistent with the
requirements of the Mitigation Fee Act. A five percent (5%) Administrative Fee is added to fund
the costs of the City's management and ongoing fee program administration, collection, and
reporting. This includes costs associated with City staff and consultant time, studies, and
administration to support the program. Industry standard ranges from three to six percent (3-6%)
for the administrative component of a development fee program. The administrative functions
includes, but is not limited to, the following:
• Annual fee adjustments
• Annual fee reporting
• Additional fee reporting every five years
• Posting of nexus studies and fee schedules on the City's website
• Periodic nexus study updates
• Staff and consultant time related to fee preparation, collection, tracking, and administration
Fee Adjustment Procedures
The DIFs may be adjusted periodically to reflect revised facility requirements, receipt of funding
from alternative sources (i.e., state or federal grants), revised facilities or costs, changes in
demographics, changes in the average unit square footage, or changes in the land use plan. In
Development Impact Fee Nexus Study 4 July 2023
City of Moorpark
Resolution No. 2023-4196
Page 14
addition, in July of each calendar year, the fees will automatically be adjusted using the
Construction Cost Index (CCI) for the Los Angeles Region as reported by Engineering News
Record(ENR)for the twelve-month period ending in May or a similar published index if the CCI
Index is no longer available. For example, the adjustment for July 2024 will be determined by
taking the percentage change of the Los Angeles construction cost index from May 2023 to May
2024.
Timing of Fee Payment
Fees will be collected at the time the building permit for the project is issued. All residential
projects will pay a fee based on the livable square footage of the residential unit(s). For high-
density residential projects,the fees will be due at the time of the building permit for each building.
For high-density residential projects, the non-residential communal portion (i.e., clubhouse,
maintenance facility, gym, etc.) will not be assessed impact fees as the impact is assumed to be
captured in the residential fees. Area that are accessible by the public (i.e., leasing office) will be
charged impact fees according to use.
Development Impact Fee Nexus Study 5 July 2023
City of Moorpark
Resolution No. 2023-4196
Page 15
Section 2 Legal Context and Methodology
Nexus Requirement Summary
AB1600 was enacted by the State of California in 1987 creating the Mitigation Fee Act- Section
66000 et seq. of the Government Code. The Mitigation Fee Act requires that all public agencies
satisfy the following requirements when establishing, increasing, or imposing a fee as a condition
of approval of a development project:
1. Identify the purpose of the fee.
2. Identify the use to which the fee is to be put. If the use is financing public facilities, the
facilities shall be identified.
3. Determine how there is a reasonable relationship between the fees use and the type of
development project on which the fee is imposed.
4. Determine how there is a reasonable relationship between the need for the public
facility and the type of development project on which the fee is imposed.
5. Determine how there is a reasonable relationship between the amount of the fee and
the cost of the public facility or portion of the public facility attributable to the
development on which the fee is imposed.
The purpose of this report is to demonstrate that all fee components comply with the Mitigation
Fee Act. The assumptions,methodologies,facility standards, costs, and cost allocation factors that
were used to establish the nexus between the fees and the development on which the fees will be
charged are summarized in subsequent sections of this report.
AB602
AB602, which was enacted by the State of California in 2021, amended Sections 65940.1 and
66019 of, and added Section 66016.5 to the Government Code. AB602 requires that if a local
agency conducts and adopts an impact fee nexus study after January 1,2022,the local agency shall
follow all of the following standards and practices:
1. Before the adoption of an associated development fee, an impact fee nexus study shall
be adopted.
2. When applicable, the nexus study shall identify the existing level of service for each
public facility, identify the proposed new level of service, and include an explanation
of why the new level of service is appropriate.
3. A nexus study shall include information that supports the local agency's actions, as
required by subdivision(a) of Section 66001 of the Government Code.
4. If a nexus study supports the increase of an existing fee, the local agency shall review
the assumptions of the nexus study supporting the original fee and evaluate the amount
of fees collected under the original fee.
Development Impact Fee Nexus Study 6 July 2023
City of Moorpark
Resolution No. 2023-4196
Page 16
5. A nexus study adopted after July 1, 2022, shall calculate a fee imposed on a housing
development project proportionately to the square footage of proposed units of the
development. A local agency that imposes a fee proportionately to the square footage
of the proposed units of the development shall be deemed to have used a valid method
to establish a reasonable relationship between the fee charged and the burden posed by
the development. A nexus study is not required to comply with the requirements to
calculate a fee imposed on a housing development project proportionally to the square
footage of the proposed units if the local agency makes the following findings:
• An explanation as to why square footage is not appropriate metric to calculate fees
imposed on housing development project.
• An explanation that an alternative basis of calculating the fee bears a reasonable
relationship between the fee charged and the burden posed by the development.
• That other policies in the fee structure support smaller developments, or otherwise
ensure that smaller developments are not charged disproportionate fees.
6. Large jurisdictions shall adopt a capital improvement plan as a part of the nexus study.
7. All studies shall be adopted at a public hearing with at least 30 days' notice, and the
local agency shall notify any member of the public that requests notice of intent to
begin an impact fee nexus study of the date of the hearing.
8. Studies shall be updated at least every eight years, from the period beginning on
January 1, 2022.
9. The local agency may use the impact fee nexus study template developed by the
Department of Housing and Community Development pursuant to Section 50466.5 of
the Health and Safety Code.
The purpose of this report is to demonstrate that all fee components comply with the Mitigation
Fee Act and AB602. An analysis of level of service for each applicable fee component is
summarized in subsequent sections of this report.
Capital Improvement Plan:
AB602 states that large jurisdictions shall adopt a capital improvement plan (CIP) as part of the
nexus study. This Nexus Report includes the facilities to be adopted as the City's CIP for the DIF
program in Appendix A.
Explanation of Level of Service and Fee Increase: AB602 requires that when applicable, the
nexus study identifies the existing level of service for each public facility, identifies the proposed
new level of service, and includes an explanation of why the new level of service is appropriate.
Since the City does not currently have impact fees for city hall improvements and the
transportation fee is a new combined fee program, the calculation presented herein for these two
Development Impact Fee Nexus Study 7 July 2023
City of Moorpark
Resolution No. 2023-4196
Page 17
fee programs provide justification for an entirely new fee rather than an increase over an existing
amount. This Nexus Report relies on existing level of service standards developed in consultation
with City staff and with reference to the existing capital facilities and improvements in the City
for the Library Fee, Park & Recreation Fee, and the Police Fee documented herein and is
appropriate for new development to pay their fair share.
Methodology
Imposed fees require various findings to ensure that a reasonable relationship exists between the
fee amount and the cost of the facility or portion of the facility attributable to the new development.
Several methodologies are available to determine fee amounts. Choosing the appropriate
methodology depends on the type of facility for which the fee is calculated and the availability of
documentation to support the fee calculation. Following is a discussion of the methodologies
available to calculate the separate fee components in this report.
Facility Standards Method
The facility standards method determines the facilities and associated costs required to
accommodate growth based on adopted City standards. Depending on the fee analysis, the City
may or may not currently have sufficient facilities to meet the adopted standard. If the City's
existing facilities are below the standards, then a deficiency exists. In this case, the portion of the
cost of planned facilities associated with correcting the deficiency must be satisfied with funding
sources other than Development Impact Fees. AB 1600 fees can only fund facilities needed to
accommodate new development at the adopted standard.
Master Plan Method
The master plan method is based on a master facilities plan in situations where the needed facilities
serve both existing and new development. This approach allocates existing and planned facilities
across existing and new development to determine new development's fair share of the needed
facility. This approach is used when it is not possible to differentiate the benefits of new facilities
between existing and new development.
Planned Facilities Method
The planned facilities method calculates the standard based solely on the ratio of planned facilities
to the increase in demand associated with new development. This method is appropriate when
planned facilities are mostly for the benefit of new development, such as a wastewater trunk line
extension to a previously undeveloped area. This method may also be used when there is excess
capacity in existing facilities that can accommodate new development.
Development Impact Fee Nexus Study 8 July 2023
City of Moorpark
Resolution No. 2023-4196
Page 18
Existing Inventory Method
The existing inventory method uses a facility standard based on the ratio of existing facilities to
the existing service population on a cost per unit or cost per square foot basis. Under this approach,
new development funds the expansion of facilities at the same standard currently serving existing
development. By definition,the existing inventory method ensures that no facility deficiencies are
spread to future development. This method is often used when a long-range plan for new facilities
is not available.
Development Impact Fee Nexus Study 9 July 2023
City of Moorpark
Resolution No. 2023-4196
Page 19
Section 3 Population and Land Use Assumptions
Land Use Types
To ensure a reasonable relationship between each fee and the type of development paying the fee,
different land use types must be distinguished. The land use categories used in this analysis are
defined below.
• Single Family Residential (SFR): Detached single-family dwelling units. Includes
rural, neighborhood very low, neighborhood low, mobile home, and mixed-use
district.
• Multi-Family Residential(MFR): Attached residential projects. Includes neighborhood
medium density(24 units/acre),mixed-use medium,mixed-use district,and
neighborhood high density.
• Accessory Dwelling Unit(ADU): A second unit, attached or detached from a single-
family home.
• Commercial: All commercial, retail, educational,hotel/motel development, and
mixed-use development.
• Office: All general,professional, and medical office development.
• Industrial: All manufacturing and warehouse development.
The revised General Plan incorporates office land uses within the industrial park and industrial
flex land use categories. For purposes of the Nexus Study, the office and industrial land uses
remain to calculate the fees as different assumptions are used for each land use category (i.e., trip
generation rates). Fees are calculated for each land use so they may be correctly charged to future
development. The projected growth has been allocated between office and industrial at 20 percent
office and 80 percent industrial based on the approximate current distribution, the General Plan,
and land use trends.
Some developments may include more than one land use type, such as an industrial warehouse
with living quarters (a live-work designation) or a planned unit development with both single and
multi-family uses. In these cases, the fees will be calculated separately for each land use type.
Growth Forecasts
Growth projections are used as indicators of demand. The City's existing population and Buildout
population projections are critical assumptions used throughout the fee sections that follow in this
report. As part of the Moorpark General Plan comprehensive update effort, the City prepared a
Buildout Methodology for Calculating Development Capacity document which summarized the
methodology used to analyze the potential development capacity of the proposed General Plan
Land Use Plan. The Methodology document provided data pertaining to existing conditions,
Development Impact Fee Nexus Study 10 July 2023
City of Moorpark
Resolution No. 2023-4196
Page 20
estimates of future development based on the currently adopted General Plan,and a Proposed Land
Use Plan that reflects changes to land use designations in the Preferred Plan approved by Council
on February 2, 2022.
This Development Impact Fee Nexus Study relied on the Buildout Methodology document, the
General Plan, and the City's Housing Element as an accepted source of data for the following:
• Existing conditions which reflect the current environment as of 2022.
• Estimates of total development through Buildout based on the Land Use Plan projections
in the General Plan 2050(May 3, 2023).
• Existing populations(2022)and population projections at Buildout based on persons per
household assumptions.
• Existing non-residential worker populations and projections of non-residential worker
populations at Buildout based on employees per 1,000 square feet assumptions.
Table 3-1 identifies the existing service population.
Table 3-1: Existing Service Population
Category Total Persons Weighting Factor 2 Service Population
Residents 36,395 1.00 36,395
Workers 13,128 0.37 4,857
TOTAL 49,523 41,252
Source:Moorpark citywide Buildout Methodology Memo(April 22,2022)and Housing Bement.
1 Existing residents based on the Moorpark General Ran Methodology for Calculating Development Capacity
Memo(April 22,2022).Existing workers are from the Moorpark Draft Housing Bement 2021-2029
(November 23,2022).
2 Workers are w eighted at 0.37 based on a 45 hour workweek(8 hours of work and 1 hour for lunch per
work day)relative to a resident's time of 123 hours(168 hours per week less 45 work hours).
Table 3-2 shows the estimated service population at Buildout. In calculating the service
population, workers are weighted less than residents to reflect lower per capita service demand.
Non-residential buildings are typically occupied less intensively than dwelling units, so it is
reasonable to assume that average per-worker demand for services is less than average per-resident
demand. The 0.37-weighting factor for workers is based upon a 45-hour work week (40 hours of
work plus 1 hour lunch break) relative to a resident's non-working time of 123 hours (168 hours
per week less 45 work hours).
Development Impact Fee Nexus Study 11 July 2023
City of Moorpark
Resolution No. 2023-4196
Page 21
Table 3-2: Estimated Service Population at Buildout
Total Future Service
Future Persons at Weighting Service Population at
Category Persons Buildout1 Factor2 Population Buildout
Residents 14,326 50,721 1.00 14,326 50,721
Workers 4,315 17,443 0.37 1,597 6,454
Total 68,164 15,923 57,175
Source: Moorpark Citywide Buildout Methodology Memo(April 22,2022).
1 Total future residents at Buildout based on future units and persons per household assumptions.The total differs
slightly from the General Ran due to the persons per household factor being applied to single-farrily and
multifamily units for purposes of this analysis instead of the overall average of 3.2 persons per household
used in the General Ran.
2 Workers are weighted at 0.37 based on a 45 hour workweek(8 hours of work and 1 hour for lunch per work day)
relative to a resident's time of 123 hours(168 hours per week less 45 work hours).
Table 3-3 shows the estimated dwelling units and non-residential square feet, existing and at
Buildout.
Table 3-3: Estimated Buildout Projected New Growth
Land Use Existing Development Buildout Development Projected Growth
Residential Units
Single Family 1 8,881 9,498 617
Multi-Family 2 2,640 6,648 4,008
TOTAL 11,521 16,146 4,625
Non-Residential Square Feet
Commercial 3 1,752,318 3,942,856 2,190,538
Office" 723,787 1,313,872 590,085
Industrial 4 4,277,295 6,637,638 2,360,343
TOTAL 6,753,400 11,894,366 5,140,966
Source: Moorpark Citywide Buildout Methodology Memo(April 22, 2022)and City of Moorpark Draft 2021-2029
Housing Element (November 23, 2022).
1 Single Family includes the following land uses:Rural,Neighborhood Very Low,Neighborhood Low,Mobile Home,
and Mixed Use Density(8 units/acre).The projected accounts for redevelopment as vacant buildings and
underutilized properties have the potential to be redeveloped.Going forward the City will continue to develop to
accommodate residential population and non-resident employment growth to meet the California Regional Housing
Needs.The projected growth includes the growth anticipated from redevelopment as well as the anticipated Hitch
2 Multi-Family includes the following land uses:Neighborhood Medium (24 units/acre),Mixed Use Medium (ADUs are
not accounted for due to the fact that DIFs are not charged on ADUs less than 750 SF),Mixed Use District.and
Neighborhood High.
3 Commercial Buildout Square Footage includes all non-residential square footage proposed in SP1.SP92-1,and SP.
4 The revised General Plan incorporates Office land uses within the Industrial Park and Industrial Flex land use
categories.The projected growth has been allocated between Office and Industrial approximately20 percent office
and 80 percent industrial based on the approximate current distribution.
Development Impact Fee Nexus Study 12 July 2023
City of Moorpark
Mot
Resolution No. 2023-4196
Page 22
Occupant Density
Occupant densities ensure a reasonable relationship between the increase in service population and
the amount of the fee. Developers pay the fee based on the square footage of additional housing
units or building square feet of non-residential development, so the fee schedule must convert
service population estimates to these measurements of project size. This conversion is done using
the average occupant density factors by land use type shown in Table 3-4. The residential density
factors were derived from the US Census American Community Survey and proportionally
updated based on the average persons per household factor of 3.2 in the General Plan. The non-
residential densities were derived from the City's Buildout Methodology document with slight
adjustments made to office and industrial based on industry standards.
Table 3-4: Persons per Household & Employment Density
Land Use
Residential m
Single Family 3.60 Residents per dwelling unit
Multi-Family 2.80 Residents per dwelling unit
Non-Residential 2
Commercial 1.00 Employees per 1,000 building square feet
Office 2.00 Employees per 1,000 building square feet
Industrial 0.40 Employees per 1,000 building square feet
Source:U.S.Census Bureau,American Community Survey and Moorpark General Ran(May 3,2023).
1 Extrapolated from American Community Survey 2020 5-Year Estimates:Table B25032&B25033
and updated based on the average of 3.2 persons per household in the City of Moorpark
General Ran 2050(May 3,2023).
2 Based on Moorpark General Ran Methodology for Calculating Development Capacity Merry
(April 22,2022)and adjusted based on industry standards.
Average Unit Sizes
To meet AB602 requirement five (5),this Nexus Study calculated the average unit size for single
family residential and multifamily units based on the estimated average size of planned new
development within each land use category in the City.The average unit size is based on the livable
square footage of the residential unit for all residential land uses.
Development Impact Fee Nexus Study 13 July 2023
City of Moorpark
Resolution No. 2023-4196
Page 23
Basing the average unit size on livable square footage for all residential units is not only consistent
with industry standard for fee calculations, it provides a strong nexus between the impact of the unit
and the fee amount. A good example of this industry standard are school fees in California. In
California school fees are based on assessable space, which means a quantity equal to the area
(expressed in square feet) within the perimeter of a residential structure, not including the carport,
walkway,garage, overhang,patio, enclosed patio,detached accessory structure or similar structure.
To accurately capture the impact of a residential project on capital facilities, for the high-density
residential projects,the communal spaces(i.e.,clubhouse,maintenance facility,gym,etc.)will not
be assessed impact fees as the impact is assumed to be captured in the residential fees. Areas that
contain employees and are accessible by the public (i.e., leasing office) will be charged impact
fees according to use.The non-residential area accessible by the public will be based on the useable
size.This captures the additional impact these facilities will have on the facilities in the City.Table
3-5 summarizes the estimated average size of planned new development within each residential
land use category utilized for this study, based on the Hitch Ranch Development Project.
Table 3-5: Residential Land Use Average Unit Size
Land Use Unit Size (SF)
Residential
Single Family 2,500
Multi-Family 1,400
Note:Densities calculated using the Conceptual Product Breakdown of the Hitch
Ranch Planning Design Book and averaging the home sizes within the respective
land use categories.
The City will monitor the average size of housing units in the City based on new developments
on an annual basis and if the size of units on average are significantly different than anticipated,
the fees will be updated as part of the annual update to reflect this change in order to ensure the
fee program does not fall short.
Development Impact Fee Nexus Study 14 July 2023
City of Moorpark
Resolution No. 2023-4196
Page 24
Section 4 Library Fee
Background
This section presents an analysis of the City's Library Fee. The City currently has a Library Fee
and this Nexus Study presents the methodology to update the Library Fee. The Library Fee covers
the costs to mitigate the impacts of new development on the City's library facilities. New
development in the fee program area will pay a library impact fee at building permit issuance for
the facility project described in this section. The Library Fee is based on the planned facilities
associated with new development.
Current Facilities
The City currently operates a 7,800 square feet(SF) library, located at 699 Moorpark Avenue. The
library offers a variety of programs for children, youth, and adults, with programs and events
planned throughout the week.
Planned Facilities
The City plans to construct a new 17,500 SF library facility on the north side of High Street, as
part of the Civic Center Master Plan which includes a new city hall development north of the new
library site. The City intends to demolish the existing library once the new library is constructed.
The current library standard is 0.5 square feet per capita, which was used as the basis for the size
of the new 17,500 SF library facility to serve the existing service population. The City plans to
expand the library to 22,000 SF to address the needs of the population at Buildout and serve new
development.Therefore,new development must fund the cost for the additional 4,500 SF of library
expansion.
Per City Staff, the construction cost for the new 17,500 SF library facility, is estimated to cost
$30,000,000. Table 4-1 presents the new library cost and size.
Table 4-1: New Library Cost and Size
Facility Amount
Moorpark New Library Cost 1 $30,000,000
New Library Size(SF) 17,500
1 Projected cost provided by the City Staff and includes utilities and soft costs,excludes land value.
Fee Methodology
The Library Fee is calculated using the planned facilities method. The planned facilities method
calculates the standard based on the planned facilities associated with new development. Because
the new library at 17,500 SF is sized to serve the existing population, new development will not
contribute to the costs of constructing the 17,500 SF library. New development is responsible for
Development Impact Fee Nexus Study 15 July 2023
City of Moorpark
Resolution No. 2023-4196
Page 25
the costs attributable to the 4,500 SF future library expansion project. Due to the future nature of
the expansion project, cost per SF of library space is estimated using the cost estimate per SF for
the new library facility as shown in Table 4-2.
Table 4-2: Cost per SF for Library Space
Library Facility Cost per SF Value
New Moorpark Library Cost 1 $30,000,000
New Moorpark Library Size (SF) 17,500
Cost per SF for Library Space $1,714.29
1 Projected cost provided by the City Staff and includes utilities and soft costs,excludes land value.
Using the cost per SF of library space and the 4,500 SF needed to serve future population
growth, the cost per capita is calculated in Table 4-3.
Table 4-3: Cost per Capita for Library Space
Future Users Library Expansion
Library Expansion Square Feet 1 4,500
Cost per SF for Library Space $1,714.29
Cost of Library Expansion Attributable to Future Population $7,714,305
Future Service Population Growth (Capita) 15,923
Cost per Capita $484.48
1 Expanded library square footage needed at buildout provided by City staff.
Fee Summary
The Library Fee per Capita in Table 4-3 is distributed across the various land uses by multiplying
the cost per capita by the average number of residents/workers per unit type (density). The cost
per capita for non-residential land uses is weighted using the factors shown in Table 3-1. For each
residential land use,the fee per unit is then converted to a fee per square foot by dividing the cost
per unit by the estimated average unit size for each land use. The total fee includes a five percent
(5%) administrative charge to fund fee program administrative costs, including but not limited to
preparing annual reports, preparing fee updates, and other administrative tasks related to the fee
program administration. Table 4-4 summarizes this calculation.
Table 4-4: Library Fee Summary
Total Fee
Cost Per Subtotal Administration Average Unit per SF
Land Use Capita Density Fee Fee Total Fee Size(SF) (Rounded)
Residential (Fee per Unit) (Fee per SF)
Single Family $484.48 3.60 $1,744.13 $87.21 $1,831.34 2,500 $0.73
Multi-Family $484.48 2.80 $1,356.54 $67.83 $1,424.37 1,400 $1.02
Non-Residential (Fee per 1,000 SF)
Commercial $179.26 1.00 $179.26 $8.96 $188.22
Office $179.26 2.00 $358.52 $17.93 $376.45
Industrial $179.26 0.40 $71.70 $3.59 $75.29
1 Densityfactor used for non-residential is based upon number of employees per 1,000 Building SF.
Development Impact Fee Nexus Study 16 July 2023
City of Moorpark
Resolution No. 2023-4196
Page 26
Revenue Projections
Table 4-5 summarizes the anticipated revenue collection from the Library Fee. The revenue will
be available to fund the 4,500 SF library expansion.
Table 4-5: Anticipated Library Fee Collection at Buildout
Anticipated
Anticipated Fee
Proposed Growth Anticipated Collection at
Land Use Fee' (units) Growth (SF) Buildout2
Residential (Fee per SF) (Fee per SF)
Single Family $0.70 569 1,422,500 $995,750
Multi-Family $0.97 4,385 6,139,000 $5,954,830
Non-Residential (Fee per 1,000 SF) (Fee per 1,000 SF)
Commercial $179.26 n/a 2,190,538 $392,676
Office $358.52 n/a 590,085 $211,557
Industrial $71.70 n/a 2,360,343 $169,237
Total $7,724,050
'Excludes the administrative portion of the fee.
2 Total fee revenue may differ slightly from cost attributable to fee program due to rounding.
Nexus Requirement Summary
The Library Fee component of the DIF meets the Mitigation Fee Act Requirements, as described
in this section.
Requirement 1:Identify the purpose of the fee.
The purpose of the Library Fee is to fund new development's share of the future library facility
that is needed to serve the new population growth.Each new resident and worker creates a demand
for additional library facilities. In order to accommodate these needs, an expansion to the new
library will be built as outlined in the Civic Center Master Plan.
Requirement 2:Identify the use of the fee.
The Library Fee will be used to fund the expansion of the library facility in order to meet the needs
generated by new development. The City plans to construct a new 17,500 sq ft. library facility on
the north side of High Street. As part of the Civic Center Master Plan, the library will be further
expanded to 22,000 SF to meet the needs of the population at Buildout.
Development Impact Fee Nexus Study 17 July 2023
City of Moorpark
Resolution No. 2023-4196
Page 27
Requirement 3:Determine how there is a reasonable relationship between the fee's use and the
type of development project on which the fee is imposed.
The fee will be used to fund the expansion of the library facility necessary to serve the increased
residents and workers generated by new development. The Library Fee is calculated using the
planned facilities method and is based on the number of new residents or workers that are generated
by each type of new development. New development is responsible for paying its fair share of the
new library facility. Table 4-3 calculates the cost per capita for library facilities. The cost per
capita is then allocated to each development type based on the estimated persons per household
and employees per 1,000 square feet. Workers are weighted at a lower weight than residents to
reflect their lesser impact on the facilities. Table 4-4 calculates the cost per square foot for the
residential units based on the estimated average unit size and cost per 1,000 square feet for non-
residential. Spreading the fee based on the new residents or workers generated by each land use
ensures a reasonable relationship between the fees use and the type of development project.
Requirement 4: Determine how there is a reasonable relationship between the need for the
public facility and the type of development project on which the fee is imposed
Each new development is anticipated to generate new residents and workers. The addition of new
residents and workers creates the need for new library facilities. The Library Fee is based on the
number of applicable workers and/or residents each new development is expected to generate,thus
ensuring that the need for the facilities is directly related to a particular development's impact.
New workers generate a smaller demand than a resident,thus one worker is considered,on average,
as equivalent to 0.37 that of a resident. This relationship is calculated in Table 4-4.
Requirement 5: Determine how there is a reasonable relationship between the amount of the
• fee and the cost of the public facility or portion of the public facility attributable to the
development on which the fee is imposed
The Library Fee will fund the planned library expansion project that is required to serve the new
development in the City. The cost of the planned library expansion has been estimated and
apportioned to future users.
The Library Fee is calculated by taking the estimated library cost for the 4,500 SF library
expansion project divided by the number of future service population for a future service
population growth cost per capita,as shown in Table 4-3. The cost is spread to each land use based
on the number of new resident equivalents that the land use will generate calculated as a DUE
factor as shown in Table 4-4. By spreading the fee based on the DUE factor, each new
development is only paying for their fair share of the required facilities since the need for the
facilities directly correlates to the addition of new residents and workers.
Development Impact Fee Nexus Study 18 July 2023
City of Moorpark
Resolution No. 2023-4196
Page 28
Section 5 Park & Recreation Fee
Background
This section presents an analysis of the need for additional park and recreation facilities to
accommodate new development in the City and the fees that are necessary in order to ensure that
new development provides adequate funding to meet those needs. This Nexus Study updates the
methodology of the existing Park Facilities Fee.
The City classifies park facilities into six categories per the City's Parks and Recreation Master
Plan (Parks Master Plan),prepared by MIG in April 2009: Mini Parks (localized parks with
maximum size of 2.5 acres),Neighborhood Parks (range from 2.5 to 16 acres), Community Parks
(16 acres or more), Regional Parks (exceeds 50 acres), Special Use Areas (specialized recreation
facilities), and Linear Parks (follow linear corridors such as rivers, creeks, abandoned railway
right-of-way, canals, power lines). This study will consider Mini Parks, Neighborhood Parks,
Community Parks, and Recreational Facilities. Recreation Facilities can include community
centers,active adult centers,aquatic facilities,and other recreation facilities.For this Nexus Study,
recreation facilities include a community center and active adult center as a component of this fee.
City Hall and Library are included under separate fees.
Residential development in the City will pay the Park and Recreation Fee at building permit
issuance. The park cost was estimated based on the existing City standard of 5 acres per 1,000
persons. The recreation portion of the fee is based on the existing inventory method. The Park and
Recreation Fee is for park and recreation facility development cost only and does not include
parkland acquisition costs. Parkland acquisition under the Quimby Act requires developers to
either dedicate land to satisfy their parkland requirement or pay an in-lieu fee. The in-lieu fee is
dependent upon appraised land cost and thus,the amount should be agreed upon between the City
and the developer when the land dedication is triggered. The City has an existing Quimby in-lieu
fee.
Table 5-1 identifies the current recreation facilities inventory that serves the existing service
population. The existing recreation facilities include the Arroyo Vista Recreation Center and the
Active Adult Center.The Arroyo Vista Recreation Center offers a variety of recreational programs
for all ages and includes: sports,programs for seniors, community events,teen events, camps and
more. The facility can also be rented for private parties. The City's Active Adult Center provides
ongoing programs and services, as well as special activities, for individuals 55 years of age or
older.
Development Impact Fee Nexus Study 19 July 2023
City of Moorpark
Resolution No. 2023-4196
Page 29
Table 5-1: Recreational Facility Inventory
Recreation Facility SF Value
Active Adult Center 12,713 $ 3,779,691
Arroyo Vista Recreation Center 29,546 $ 8,851,861
Total Recreation Facilities 42,259 $ 12,631,552
Current Level of Service
Per the City's Existing Conditions Report (December 2020), the City has a total of 188 acres of
developed parkland and based on a population of approximately 37,000, there are 5.1 acres of
existing parkland per 1,000 people. Furthermore, according to the City of Moorpark General Plan
2050(May 3,2023),the City has approximately 4.3 acres of park land per 1,000 people. Combined
with the Moorpark Golf Course,a private course,the city exceeds its goal of having, in aggregate,
5.0 acres of parkland per 1,000 people citywide. Thus, the current parkland exceeds the standard
of 5 acres per 1,000 people on a citywide level.
Planned Level of Service
The City has established a goal for parks at 5 acres of parkland per 1,000 people, per the Parks
Master Plan and City General Plan. The City is currently meeting this goal and therefore, this
Analysis is based on the existing City standard of 5 acres per 1,000 people. The recreation
component of the fee is based on the existing level of service cost per capita for recreation facilities
in the City.
Parkland
AB1191, also known as the Quimby Act, was established by the California State Legislature in
1965 and codified as California Government Code Section 66477. The Quimby Act outlines the
requirements for imposing fees for park purposes with a minimum of three (3) acres and a
maximum of five (5) acres of green space per 1,000 residents. The Quimby Act allows the
legislative body of a city or county, by ordinance, to require the dedication of land or impose a
requirement of the payment of fees in lieu thereof,or a combination of both,for park or recreational
purposes as a condition to the approval of a tentative tract map or parcel map. Currently the City
imposes a Residential Quimby Park Fee based on 5 acres per 1,000 persons or the payment of an
in-lieu fee. The formula is based on a dwelling unit factor(currently 3.22),the parkland dedication
requirement (currently 5 acres per 1,000 persons) and the fair market value per acre (varies per
development).
Service Population
The Parks and Recreation Fee is not applied to non-residential development because workers
typically do not use park and recreation facilities.
Development Impact Fee Nexus Study 20 July 2023
City of Moorpark
Resolution No. 2023-4196
Page 30
Fee Methodology
The park portion of the fee is based on the facility standards method. This method determines the
facilities and associated costs required to accommodate growth based on adopted City standards.
Using this approach for parks, new development funds the expansion of facilities at the adopted
General Plan standard for the City. Table 5-2 identifies the park cost per capita based on the
General Plan standard of 5.0 acres per 1,000 residents. The total park development cost was
calculated using the cost per acre of park development for a typical 5-acre neighborhood park
estimated in neighboring City of Camarillo's Pleasant Valley Recreation & Park District Impact
Fee Nexus Study (April 2021) Appendix A and indexed using ENR CCI for Los Angeles. Fee
revenues may be used to construct park improvements and facilities on land dedicated by
developers in accordance with the City's Quimby Ordinance or though land purchased through the
payment of the in-lieu Quimby Fee.
The recreation portion of the fee is based on the existing inventory method. This method uses a
facility standard based on the ratio of existing facilities to the existing service population on a cost
per unit or cost per square foot basis. Under this approach, new development funds the expansion
of facilities at the same standard currently serving existing development.By definition,the existing
inventory method ensures that no facility deficiencies are spread to future development. Table 5-
3 identifies the existing level of service of recreation facilities for the City's current service
population. As described in more detail in Chapter 9, the City may provide fee credits or
reimbursements to developers who construct eligible facilities.
Table 5-2: Park Facility Cost per Resident
Park Development Cost Value
Park Development Cost (per Acre)1 $553,001
Required Acres/1,000 Residents' 5.00
Park Development Cost per 1,000 Residents $2,765,005
Total Park Cost per Capita $2,765.01
1 Park Development Cost estimate uses Pleasant Valley Recreation&Park District(City of
Camarillo)average development cost per acre amount($484,000)identified in the Pleasant Valley
Recreation and Park District Park Impact Fee Nexus Study,April 2021 (Appendix A).The cost
estimate is adjusted to ENR CCI for Los Angeles Region(April 2021 - 12139.56,March 2022-
13870.23).
2 Based on the General Ran level of service.
Development Impact Fee Nexus Study 21 July 2023
City of Moorpark
Resolution No. 2023-4196
Page 31
Table 5-3: Existing Recreation Facility Level of Service
Recreation Facility Value
Recreation Square Footage 42,259
Recreation Facility Value $12,631,552
. Existing Service Population 36,395
Total Existing Level of Service per 1,000 Residents(SF) 1,161.12
Total Existing Level of Service per Capita(Cost) $347.07
1 Recreation Facility size and value based on the CJPIA Property Schedule(prepared by Alliant Insurance
Services, Inc.),dated March 24,2022. Increased to March 2023 dollars by ENR BC!for Los Angeles
Region(March 2022 to March 2023).
Fee Summary
The Park and Recreation Fee per unit is calculated by multiplying the cost per capita by the average
number of residents per unit type (density). The fee per unit must then be converted to a fee per
square foot by taking the cost per unit and dividing by the estimated average unit size for each land
use. The total fee includes a five percent (5%) administrative charge to fund fee program
administrative costs, including but not limited to preparing annual reports, preparing fee updates,
and other administrative tasks related to the fee program administration. These calculations are
shown in Table 5-4.
Table 5-4: Parks Fee Cost Summary
Park Park&
Facilities Cost Recreation Recreation Administration Total Fee Average Total Fee
Per Cost Fee Fee Per Unit Unit Size per SF
Land Use Capita Per Capita Density Per Unit Per Unit I (Rounded) (SF) (Rounded)
Residential
Single Family $2,765.01 $347.07 3.60 $11,203.48 $560.17 $11,763.65 2,500 $4.71
Multi-Family $2,765.01 $347.07 2.80 $8,713.82 $435.69 $9,149.51 1,400 $6.54
1 M administrative fee of 5%is included for(1)legal,accounting,and other administrative support and(2)development impact fee program
administration costs including revenue collection,revenue and cost accounting,mandated public reporting,and fee justification analysis.
Revenue Projections
Table 5-5 summarizes the anticipated Park & Recreation Fee revenue. The revenue will be
available to expand the City's park and recreation facilities to meet the needs of new residents.
Based on the population estimates in this Nexus Study and using the City General Plan standard
of 5 acres per 1,000 residents parks, it is anticipated that approximately 60 additional acres of parks
are needed to meet the needs at Buildout of the City.
The City has recently embarked on a comprehensive update of the 2009 Parks and Recreation
Master Plan. When complete, the update will address needs of aging park and recreation
infrastructure and new facilities and amenities, including prioritization of needs and estimated
costs to implement recommendations.
Development Impact Fee Nexus Study 22 July 2023
City of Moorpark
Resolution No. 2023-4196
Page 32
Table 5-5: Parks Fee Estimated Revenue at Buildout
Anticipated
Anticipated Anticipated Fee
Proposed Growth Growth Collection at
Land Use Feel (units) (SF) Buildout2
Residential (Fee per SF)
Single Family $4.49 569 1,422,500 $6,387,025
Multi-Family $6.23 4,385 6,139,000 $38,245,970
Total 4,954 7,561,500 $44,632,995
'Excludes the adrrinistrative portion of the fee.
2 Total fee revenue may differ slightly from cost attributable to fee program due to rounding.
Nexus Requirement Summary
The Park and Recreation Fee component of the DIF meets the Mitigation Fee Act Requirements,
as described in this section.
Requirement 1:Identify the purpose of the fee.
The purpose of the Park and Recreation Fee is to fund the park and recreation needs generated by
new development in the City. Each new resident creates a demand for additional neighborhood
parks, mini parks, community parks, and recreation facilities. The City's adopted standard is to
provide five acres of parkland for each 1,000 residents. In order to accommodate these needs, new
parks and recreation facilities will be built and/or existing parks and recreation facilities will be
expanded. Table 5-2 calculates the parks cost per capita based on the City standard for parks and
the estimated construction cost. Table 5-3 calculates the cost per capita for recreation facilities
based on the City's existing level of service. The City is completing an update to their Parks and
Recreation Master Plan which will include the parks and recreation facilities needed to meet the
needs of the future population.
Requirement 2:Identify the use of the fee.
The Park and Recreation Fee will be used to fund new park development in order to meet the City's
General Plan and Park Master Plan standards discussed in this chapter. The Fee will also fund new
recreation facilities in order to maintain the City's existing level of service. The anticipated fee
revenue at Buildout is shown on Table 5-5. It is anticipated that the comprehensive update to the
City's Parks and Recreation Master Plan will include recommended capital improvement projects
to meet the park and recreation needs of new development.
Development Impact Fee Nexus Study 23 July 2023
City of Moorpark
Resolution No. 2023-4196
Page 33
Requirement 3:Determine how there is a reasonable relationship between the fee's use and the
type of development project on which the fee is imposed.
The fee will be used to fund new neighborhood, mini and community parks, as well as, recreation
facilities that are necessary to serve the increased residents in the City. New residential
development generates additional residents which increases the demand for park and recreation
facilities. The parks portion of the Parks and Recreation Fee is calculated using the City's General
Plan standard of five(5)acres of park per 1,000 residents. Residential development is responsible
for paying its fair share to maintain the City's standard. Non-residential uses do not pay the fee
since they do not generate additional residents and workers have minimal impact on the City's
park system.
The recreation portion of the fee is based on the existing inventory method. The existing inventory
method uses a facility standard based on the ratio of existing facilities to the existing service
population on a cost per unit or cost per square foot basis. Under this approach, new development
funds the expansion of facilities at the same standard currently serving existing development. By
definition, the existing inventory method ensures that no facility deficiencies are spread to future
development. Table 5-3 identifies the existing level of service of recreation facilities for the
existing service population in the City.
Table 5-2 and Table 5-3 calculates the cost per capita for each of the fee components. The cost
per capita is then allocated to each development type based on the estimated persons per household.
Table 5-4 then calculates the cost per square foot for the residential units based on the estimated
average unit size. By basing the fee on the size of the unit and the estimated number of new
residents that is anticipated to be generated by the addition of that square footage,the fee is directly
correlated to the increased need for new parks and recreation.
Requirement 4: Determine how there is a reasonable relationship between the need fir the
public facility and the type of development project on which the fee is imposed.
Each new residential development is anticipated to generate new residents. The addition of new
residents creates the need for new neighborhood,mini and community parks to maintain the City's
General Plan park standard of five (5) acres per 1,000 residents and the need for additional
recreation facilities to maintain the City's existing level of service. The fee is directly correlated
to the number of new residents expected to be generated by each type of development. Non-
residential development does not pay for parks as non-residential developments do not generate a
significant demand for park facilities. Residential development pays its fair share based on the
estimated persons the new unit is expected to generate.
Development Impact Fee Nexus Study 24 July 2023
City of Moorpark
Resolution No. 2023-4196
Page 34
Requirement 5: Determine how there is a reasonable relationship between the amount of the
fee and the cost of the public facility or portion of the public facility attributable to the
development on which the fee is imposed.
As new residential units are constructed, new park facilities are necessary to maintain the City's
General Plan standard of five(5)acres per 1,000 residents and new recreation facilities are needed
to meet the City's existing level of service for recreation facilities. The park fee portion is
calculated by taking the cost per acre of park times five acres of parks per 1,000 residents and then
dividing that by 1,000 to determine the cost per capita,as shown in Table 5-2.Table 5-3 identifies
cost per capita for the recreation portion of the fee using the existing recreation value provided per
existing residents. The costs per capita are then spread to each residential land use based on the
persons per household each unit is expected to generate, as shown in Table 5-4. Since the need for
park land is based on the number of new residents, calculating the fee based on the number of
persons each unit is expected to generate ensures that each new residential unit is paying only its
fair share of the required facilities.
By spreading the fees based on the estimated new residents that would be generated, each new
residential unit is paying only its fair share of the facilities required to maintain the City's General
Plan Standard and existing level of service. Non-residential land uses do not have a park fee as
non-residential development will not generate an increase in park facility demand.
Development Impact Fee Nexus Study 25 July 2023
City of Moorpark
Resolution No. 2023-4196
Page 35
Section 6 City Hall Improvement Fee
Background
This section presents an analysis of the City's City Hall Improvement Fee. The City does not
currently collect a City Hall Improvement Fee but is anticipating that a new City Hall and Civic
Center Complex project will be constructed in the future. This Nexus Study is providing this
analysis as a suggested fee to include with this update to assist with funding the estimated $45
million dollar City Hall and Civic Center Complex Project. The City does currently have a City
Improvement Fund and the funds come from developers through agreements. Funds are used for
the purpose of building a new Civic Center Complex, this includes acquisition of property and
design and construction of a city hall and civic center complex on the northwest corner of
Moorpark Avenue and High Street. It also funds design expenses, engineering, construction, and
associated administrative expenses. This analysis proposes a City Hall Improvement Fee to define
the methodology for new development to mitigate their fair share of the cost of the new city hall.
Per the Civic Center Master Plan,the overall project encompasses approximately 12.9 acres in the
central, downtown area of the City. The project site is located west of Moorpark Avenue/Walnut
Canyon Road(State Route 23). Portions of the project site are located on the north and south sides
of West High Street. The project site currently contains a mix of land uses associated with the
existing Civic Center, including city hall, a community center/active adult center, a city library,
portable structures, parking areas, and vacant undeveloped areas within the western portion of the
project site. During the first phase of the project, the existing community center would remain as
an active adult center. The existing library will be removed at the end of this phase once the new
library facility is constructed. During the fourth phase, a new 22,000 square feet city hall and
mercado would be constructed.
The City Hall Improvement Fee provides the fair-share funding from new development to mitigate
the effects of new development on the City's city hall facilities.
Current Level of Service
Currently, the city hall is located at 799 Moorpark Avenue, consisting of a 5,085 square foot
building on a shared campus which houses city hall, a community center/active adult center,a city
library, portable structures, parking areas, and vacant undeveloped areas.
Planned Level of Service
The proposed city hall will provide 22,000 square feet of new construction for the administration
services of the City of Moorpark, including City Council, associated departments, and employees.
The city hall portion of the project is estimated to cost$45,000,000 plus $1,899,880 in design cost.
Table 6-1 calculates the fair share allocation of future costs associated with the proposed city hall.
Development Impact Fee Nexus Study 26 July 2023
City of Moorpark
Resolution No. 2023-4196
Page 36
Table 6-1: City Hall Facility Inventory & Level of Service
Facility Amount
Moorpark Future City Hall Cost 1 $46,899,880
Fair Share Allocation
Total Future Service Population Growth 15,923
Total Buildout Service Population 57,175
Future Growth Fair Share Allocation 28%
Future Growth Fair Share Cost $13,061,422
Total per Capita (Cost) $820.29
Source:
1 Construction cost estimate is provided by the City based on project cost of the new
library(12/8/22).Anticipated construction is still far in advance(20+years).
hcludes design cost of$1,899,880.
Fee Methodology
The City Hall Facilities Fee is calculated using the planned facilities methodology. The planned
facilities method calculates the standard based on the planned facilities associated with new
development. This method may also be used when there is excess capacity in existing facilities
that can accommodate new development.
The estimated cost for the new City Hall and Civic Center Complex is $1,899,880 in design cost
and $45,000,000 in construction costs. The new complex is still in the planning phase and
construction is anticipated to begin in approximately 20 years.
Fee Summary
The City Hall Improvement Fee per capita in Table 6-1 is distributed across the various land uses
by multiplying the cost per capita by the average number of residents/workers per unit type
(density). The cost per capita for non-residential land uses is weighted using the factors shown in
Table 3-1. For each residential land use, the fee per unit is converted to a fee per square foot by
dividing the cost per unit by the estimated average unit size for each land use. The total fee includes
a five percent(5%) administrative charge to fund fee program administrative costs, including but
not limited to preparing annual reports, preparing fee updates, and other administrative tasks
related to the fee program administration. Table 6-2 summarizes this calculation.
Development Impact Fee Nexus Study 27 July 2023
City of Moorpark
Resolution No. 2023-4196
Page 37
Table 6-2: City Hall Improvement Fee Summary
Average Total Fee
Cost Per Subtotal Administration Total Fee Unit Size per SF
Land Use Capita Density' Fee Fee (Rounded) (SF) (Rounded)
Residential (Fee per Lhit) (Fee per SF)
Single Family $820.29 3.60 $2,953.03 $147.65 $3,100.68 2,500 $1.24
Multi-Family $820.29 2.80 $2,296.80 $114.84 $2,411.64 1,400 $1.72
Non-Residential (Fee per 1,000 SF)
Commercial $303.51 1.00 $303.51 $15.18 $318.69
Office $303.51 2.00 $607.01 $30.35 $637.36
Industrial $303.51 0.40 $121.40 $6.07 $127.47
1 Density factor used for non-residential is based upon number of employees per 1,000 Building SF.
Revenue Projections
Table 6-3 summarizes the anticipated fee revenue. The revenue will be available to expand the
City's city hall facilities to meet the needs of new residents in the City.
Table 6-3: Anticipated City Hall Improvement Fee Revenues at Buildout
Anticipated
Anticipated Anticipated Fee
Proposed Growth Growth Collection
Land Use Feet (units) (SF) at Buildout2
Residential (Fee per SF) (Fee per SF)
Single Family $1.18 569 1,422,500 $1,678,550
Multi-Family $1.64 4,385 6,139,000 $10,067,960
Non-Residential (Fee per 1,000 SF) (Fee per 1,000 SF)
Commercial $303.51 n/a 2,190,538 $664,841
Office $607.01 n/a 590,085 $358,189
Industrial $121,40 n/a 2,360,343 $286,551
Total $13,056,091
' Excludes the administrative portion of the fee.
2 Total fee revenue may differ slightly from cost attributable to fee program due to rounding.
Nexus Requirement Summary
The City Hall Improvement Fee component of the DIF meets the Mitigation Fee Act
Requirements,as described in this section.
Requirement 1:Identify the purpose of the fee.
The purpose of the City Hall Improvement Fee is to fund new development's fair share of the new
city hall. Each new resident and worker create a demand for additional city hall facilities.
Development Impact Fee Nexus Study 28 July 2023
City of Moorpark
Resolution No. 2023-4196
Page 38
Requirement 2:Identify the use of the fee.
The City Hall Improvement Fee will be used to fund the new city hall facility that is needed for
the administration of the City, including City Council, associated departments, and employees.
Table 6-1 shows the anticipated cost of the new city hall, as well as the fair-share portion
attributable to new development. The gap in funding for the new city hall facility will be provided
from other funding sources that will be identified by the City as the project moves forward.
Requirement 3:Determine how there is a reasonable relationship between the fee's use and the
type of development project on which the fee is imposed.
The fee will be used to fund new city hall facilities that are necessary to serve new development
in the City.New residential and non-residential development will generate additional residents and
employees who will increase the demand for additional general government services and
personnel. The new city hall will replace the existing city hall and accordingly will continue to
serve the existing service population. Therefore,the contribution from new development is based
on the existing service population compared to the future service population. Table 6-1 calculates
the cost per capita. The cost per capita is then allocated to each development type based on the
estimated persons per household and employees per 1,000 square feet. Table 6-2 calculates the
cost per square foot for the residential units based on the estimated average unit size and cost per
1,000 square feet for non-residential. Calculating the fees based on the new residents or employees
generated ensures a reasonable relationship between the fees use and the type of development
project.
Requirement 4: Determine how there is a reasonable relationship between the need for the
public facility and the type of development project on which the fee is imposer.
Each new residential development is anticipated to generate housing for new residents. Non-
residential development is anticipated to create places for new workers to be employed. The
addition of these new residents and workers directly creates the need for increased city services
which are administered from the city hall. The City Hall Improvement Fee is based on the number
of applicable workers and/or residents each new development is expected to generate, thus
ensuring that the need for the facilities is directly related to a particular development's impact.
New workers generate a smaller demand than a resident,thus one worker is considered,on average,
as equivalent to 0.37 that of a resident. This relationship is calculated in Table 6-2.
Requirement 5: Determine how there is a reasonable relationship between the amount of the
fee and the cost of the public facility or portion of the public facility attributable to the
development on which the fee is imposed.
The City Hall Improvement Fee will fund the planned city hall that is required to serve the new
development in the City. The costs of the planned city hall facility have been apportioned between
existing and future users, as shown in Table 6-1.
Development Impact Fee Nexus Study 29 July 2023
City of Moorpark
Resolution No. 2023-4196
Page 39
The City Hall Improvement Fee is calculated by taking the total city hall cost and multiplying the
percent attributed to the future service population. The cost allocation is divided by the number of
future service population for a future service population growth cost per capita. The cost is spread
to each land use based on the number of new resident equivalents that the land use will generate
calculated as a DUE factor as shown in Table 6-2. By spreading the fee based on the DUE factor,
each new development is only paying for their fair share of the required facilities since the need
for the facilities directly correlates to the addition of new residents and workers.
Development Impact Fee Nexus Study 30 July 2023
City of Moorpark
Resolution No. 2023-4196
Page 40
Section 7 Police Facilities Fee
Background
This section presents an analysis of the City's Police Facilities Fee. The Police Facilities Fee
provides funding for police facilities, equipment, and vehicles as a result of increased demand for
police services arising from new development.
The City began collecting a Police Facilities Fee with the adoption of Ordinance No. 9 in October
1983. During April 1995,Ordinance No.9 was replaced with Ordinance No.206 which is codified
in Moorpark Municipal Code Sections 3.36.080 through 3.36.140. Resolution No. 95-1112,
established the Police Facilities Fee. City Council Resolution 2018-3692 updated the Police
Facilities Fee. This Nexus Study updates the methodology and amount of the Police Facilities Fee.
In 2005, Moorpark completed the Moorpark Police Service Center (MPSC). Construction costs
for the MPSC were paid out of the City's Endowment Fund and a portion of the costs were
considered an Interfund Loan from the Endowment Fund, which was to be paid with revenue
collected from the Police Facilities Fee. Police Facilities Fee funding has been applied to the
outstanding debt service as well as any additional expansions,vehicles and equipment that may be
necessary to serve new development.
Current Level of Service
The Police Services Center, completed in 2005, is a 27,600 square feet facility with a 900 square
foot wash shelter constructed at a total cost of$18,442,786 in March 2018 dollars. The facility is
expected to serve the City's needs at Buildout. The current value is shown below on Table 7-1.
Table 7-1 also shows the City's current police inventory of police vehicles and equipment. The
current value is divided by the existing service population to establish the existing level of service
per capita.
Development Impact Fee Nexus Study 31 July 2023
City of Moorpark
Resolution No. 2023-4196
Page 41
Table 7-1: Existing Police Facilities Level of Service
Facility SF Value
Police Services Center 1 2 27,600 $21,431,765
Police Services Center Wash Shelter ' 900 $57,750
Facility Subtotal 28,500 $21,489,515
Buildout Service Population 57,175
Total Facility Buildout Level of Service per Capita (Cost) $375.86
Equipment3 Value
2009 Segway 12 Base Model $1,950
2009 Segway 12 Base Model $1,950
2010 Harley Davidson FLHTP Electra Glide $6,600
2012 BMW R1200TP $19,500
2016 Harley Davidson FLFLHTP $22,409
2016 Harley Davidson FLFLHTP $22,409
2018 Harley Davidson FLFLHTP $19,276
2019 Chevrolet Equinox $19,681
2019 Chevrolet Equinox $19,681
Equipment Subtotal $133,456
Existing Service Population 41,252
Total Existing Equipment Level of Service per Capita (Cost) $3.24
Total Level of Service per Capita (Cost) $379.09
Source:
1 Property size from City of Moorpark CJPIA Property Schedule(March 24,2022).
2 Value from March 21,2018 Agenda Report Public Hearing to Consider Resolution Updating the
Police Facilities Fee,brought forw and to 2023 dollars via ENR CCI.
3 Equipment list from City of Moorpark 2022 0324 Vehicle Schedule,vehicles older than 15
years w ere excluded.Values increased to March 2023 dollars by ENR BCI for Los Angeles
Region(March 2022 to March 2023).
Planned Level of Service
The City plans to maintain the current level of service, as shown on Table 7-1, with appropriate
participation from new development.
Fee Methodology
The Police Facilities Fee is calculated based on the cost of the existing level of service provided
to the current population. The MPSC was sized to serve Buildout development and therefore new
development will fund its fair share of the cost of that facility plus funding for future equipment
needed. The escalated cost of the MPSC is divided by the Buildout service population and added
to the existing equipment value divided by the existing population to calculate the level of service
cost per capita. The cost of vehicles and equipment is based on the existing inventory method,
Development Impact Fee Nexus Study 32 July 2023
City of Moorpark
Resolution No. 2023-4196
Page 42
which uses a facility standard based on the ratio of existing facilities to the existing service
population on a cost per unit or cost per square foot basis. Under this approach, new development
funds the expansion of facilities at the same standard currently serving existing development.
Fee Summary
The Police Facility Fee per unit is calculated by multiplying the cost per capita by the average
number of resident equivalents per unit type(density). The cost per capita for non-residential land
uses is weighted using the factors shown in Table 3-1. For residential uses, the fee per unit must
then be converted to a fee per square foot for each unit type by dividing by the average size of each
unit. The total fee includes a five percent (5%) administrative charge to fund fee program
administrative costs, including but not limited to preparing annual reports, preparing fee updates,
and other administrative tasks related to the fee program administration. Table 7-2 summarizes
these calculations.
Table 7-2: Police Facilities Fee
Average Total Fee
Cost Per Subtotal Administration Total Fee Unit Size per SF
Land Use Capita Density' Fee Fee (Rounded) (SF) (Rounded)
Residential (Fee per Unit) (Fee per SF)
Single Family $379.09 3.60 $1,364.72 $68.24 $1,432.96 2,500 $0.57
Multi-Family $379.09 2.80 $1,061.45 $53.07 $1,114.52 1,400 $0.80
Non-Residential (Fee per 1,000 SF)
Commercial $140.26 1.00 $140.26 $7.01 $147.27
Office $140.26 2.00 $280.53 $14.03 $294.56
Industrial $140.26 0.40 $56.11 $2.81 $58.92
1 Density factor used for non-residential is based upon number of employees per 1,000 Building SF.
Revenue Projections
Table 7-3 summarizes the anticipated Police Facilities Fees. The revenue will be applied to the
outstanding debt for the MPSC and future equipment to meet the needs of new development.
Development Impact Fee Nexus Study 33 July 2023
City of Moorpark
Resolution No. 2023-4196
Page 43
Table 7-3: Anticipated Police Facilities Fee Collection at Buildout
Anticipated Anticipated Anticipated
Proposed Growth Growth Fee Collection
Land Use Feel (units) (SF) at Buildout2
Residential (Fee per SF)
Single Family $0.54 569 1,422,500 $768,150
Multi-Family $0.76 4,385 6,139,000 $4,665,640
Non-Residential (Fee per 1,000 SF)
Commercial $140.26 n/a 2,190,538 $307,252
Office $280.53 n/a 590,085 $165,535
Industrial $56.11 n/a 2,360,343 $132,428
Total $6,039,005
1 Excludes the administrative portion of the fee.
2 Total fee revenue may differ slightly from cost attributable to fee program due to rounding.
Nexus Requirement Summary
The Police Facilities Fee component of this DIF Study meets the Mitigation Fee Act Requirements,
as described in this section.
Requirement 1:Identify the purpose of the fee.
The purpose of the Police Facilities Fee is to fund new development's fair-share portion of new
police facilities,such as the outstanding debt incurred when constructing the MPSC and new police
vehicles and officer equipment required for the additional police officers that are necessary to
mitigate the impacts of new development.
Requirement 2:Identify the use of the fee.
The Police Facilities Fee will be used to fund new development's fair-share portion of the police
facilities, which include paying off the debt owed on the MPSC as well as new vehicles and
equipment required to serve new development.
Requirement 3:Determine how there is a reasonable relationship between the fee's use and the
type of development project on which the fee is imposed.
New residential and non-residential development will generate additional residents and employees
who will increase the demand for additional police services and personnel and subsequently the
need for additional police facilities and equipment required to maintain the existing level of
service. The police fees are calculated using the existing inventory method for vehicles and
equipment and a buy-in to the existing MPSC facility. The existing inventory method uses the
facility standard based on the ratio of existing vehicles and equipment to the existing service
population. Under this approach, new development funds the cost of additional facilities or
Development Impact Fee Nexus Study 34 July 2023
City of Moorpark
Resolution No. 2023-4196
Page 44
vehicles and equipment at the same standard currently serving existing development. For the buy-
in to the existing MPSC, new development's fair share is calculated based on the current cost of
the facility divided by the buildout service population. Under this approach, since the MPSC is
sized to serve Buildout, the cost is spread to the Buildout service population. Residential and non-
residential development will be responsible for their fair share portion of the total cost based on
the weighted service population assigned to each individual land use as shown in Table 7-2.
Requirement 4: Determine how there is a reasonable relationship between the need for the
public facility and the type of development project on which the fee is imposed.
Each new residential development is anticipated to generate new residents and workers. The
addition of new residents and workers creates the need for new police facilities, vehicles, and
equipment. The Police Facilities Fee is based on the number of applicable workers and/or residents
each new development is expected to generate, thus ensuring that the need for the facilities is
directly related to a particular development's impact. The Police Facilities Fee will be used to
repay the cost for the existing MPSC, thus ensuring new developments fair share of the facility.
New workers generate a smaller demand than a resident,thus one worker is considered,on average,
as equivalent to 0.37 that of a resident. This relationship is calculated in Table 7-2.
Requirement 5: Determine how there is a reasonable relationship between the amount of the
fee and the cost of the public facility or portion of the public facility attributable to the
development on which the fee is imposed.
The Police Facilities Fee funds new development's fair share of the existing MPSC and additional
police vehicles and equipment that is required to serve the new development in the City. The
current cost of the existing MSPC facility has been apportioned to the buildout service population,
as shown in Table 7-1. The cost per capita is spread to each land use based on the number of new
resident equivalents that the land use will generate calculated as a DUE factor as shown in Table
7-2. By spreading the fee based on the DUE factor,each new development is only paying for their
fair share of the required facilities since the need for the facilities directly correlates to the addition
of new residents and workers.
Development Impact Fee Nexus Study 35 July 2023
City of Moorpark
Resolution No. 2023-4196
Page 45
Section 8 Citywide Transportation Fee
Background
This section presents an analysis of the Citywide Transportation Fee. The proposed Citywide
Transportation Fee covers the costs to mitigate the impacts of new development on the City's
traffic facilities. The fees listed below are charged on new development within the City of
Moorpark that covers transportation projects that were in part or fully attributable to new
development when created:
• Transportation/Traffic System Management
• Citywide Traffic Mitigation
• Los Angeles Avenue Area of Contribution
• Tierra Rejada Road/Spring Road Area of Contribution
The new transportation fee proposes to merge the four fees above into one single fee.The proposed
single Citywide Transportation Fee takes into account the full fund balance of the Los Angeles
Avenue Area of Contribution (Fund 2014) and the Tierra Rejada Road/Spring Road Area of
Contribution (Fund 2015) and a portion of the fund balance from the Transportation/Traffic
System Management Fund (Fund 2001) and the Citywide Traffic Mitigation (Fund 2002) that
contribute to the identified transportation facility projects identified in Table 8-1.
The new Transportation Fee will establish a separate capital facilities fund to avoid any
commingling of transportation fees with other revenues and funds. The City is combining several
existing Transportation Fees into one new fee as part of this fee update. The Mitigation Fee Act
requires that fees are expended solely for the purpose for which the fees were collected. To comply
with the Mitigation Fee Act, the existing funds for the Area of Contribution (AOC) Fee (Fund
2014 and Fund 2015), Transportation/Traffic System Management Fee (Fund 2001), and the
Citywide Traffic Mitigation Fee (Fund 2002) will be transferred to the new Transportation Fee
fund in the amount allocated to the projects designated in the original fee establishment as shown
in Table 8-1.
The remaining funds within the Transportation/Traffic System Management Fund (Fund 2001)
and the Citywide Traffic Mitigation (Fund 2002) may continue to be used on maintenance costs
that has historically been drawn from Fund 2002. The proposed Citywide Transportation Fee will
be charged Citywide and not have Area of Contribution(AOC)zones.
The transportation improvements listed in Table 8-1 were compiled from the City of Moorpark's
2022/23 Fiscal Year Budget—CIP Project List with the addition of three (3)projects identified by
Development Impact Fee Nexus Study 36 July 2023
City of Moorpark
Resolution No. 2023-4196
Page 46
the City(North Hills Parkway Overcrossing State Route 23,Realignment Study for Moorpark Ave
—Poindexter/First,and Moorpark Ave Sound Walls)from the City's General Plan Update and City
discussions.
The County Traffic Impact Mitigation Fee (TIMF) is a separate fee not included in this analysis
and charged for regional transportation projects within Ventura County. The TIMF is determined
by Ventura County.
Development Impact Fee Nexus Study 37 July 2023
City of Moorpark
53
.a a N ' " '� 25 M c0 . en
a
Op.�U v w w r N N 01 Y 1.0 o
N w V N CO M M
C LL O N A
r 3 a
8
oo p pO op oo O po po a
VOi Or W e9 M W N O 4J H VOi N p
S a
ias 9 � � �C LLq� I
C N O N 0 0 000000
�
W c '6 �
m E ry .
F.
r ;
5 v°c
c_ m
w
00 . 0 . . . . . . 0 n
0 O N N N N N N N N N N N O a
O
a N N M
OI-1 r r
c.rn v
2 o
i LL N
3 A
2
Vj o
1E S_N N O N M N 2 O N N N O g
. ao+.+ $ a,o a
E o v
- ei
c ..0 a,N N N aD
O LL m
LL _u H v 0o N
10 a N T
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o .0U, N N N N N N eA N N VI N N VI .0
7
C Or
C a 4 N 0
ce
u
as I- ¢
- a IL Z
0N _ W
I 5
co o
i+ O`o,. N A O O QQ M 0 W
Q Ol n CO V' (n A a
v N N M N S
as LL c
LL
C t
t o l 8 o A t.- r m w m h �' w u
O E &E_aU 44 w 2 =°.c
Q. ' ° ELL
e_pVV p_ 8888 mmSS mLX6
L m tor
00N 2{y co R 9
1— w N M W H `Al W Q 09CC
0 W N 6 9
d N g` cc.,
2' P P .E a 7 o r'
f4 e = o, S`7 8
I— th g g 8 8 rny 'E6
m a v c
a D 9 9 tg 7,v gy g v g 4 LL ��
a Q Q a a Q d Q a a � w" w 1 ID
^ yyyyy s V[yy� °a
(/0l1 py1 LL 9 .e A-q
N D
co -; 2 ma � :a
N LL0 c2 ,' Nao u2't iL" a x
S asco
O Ae,(22 g t' � � 2, g , g ae � Z
Z g O E . rn m a vl aC a'i$i 2 3 L, o LL g.1
a e a g 2 a ; ' 2 Z p of m a li
0 ti ~ 3 $av o c v § Y y Ny •3 ;Is 8 Di a a)
� m'o 3 v3 Hm amnai 4� E -_
e
d e A"
"E' EL
a ¢ a L
L n CCCL N2Q5 � � a52 � mg s� o3 0.M
0 d1i4' 0
al NNr
iiils
`m N
H 2•• N M • 0 V
Resolution No. 2023-4196
Page 48
Service Population
Demand for services and the associated facilities for transportation are based on the additional trips
that will be generated by new development through Buildout conditions. The Citywide
Transportation Fee utilizes the land use trip generation assumptions presented in Table 8-2 for the
various residential and non-residential land uses based on the ITE Trip Generation Manual, 1 1.1
Edition.
Table 8-2: Land Use Trip Generation
Land Use Trip Generation Assumptions
Residential
Single Family 9.43
Multi-Family 1 5.64
Non-Residential(per employee)
Commercial 2 8.71
Office 3.33
Industrial 5.05
Source:ITE Trip Generation Manual,11.1 Edition.
1 Based on the average trips for attached 2-4 and attached 4+
units.
2 ITE 11th Edition notes:All land uses in the retail &services are
entitled to a "pass-by"trip reduction of 60%if less than 50,000
SF or a reduction of 40%if equal to or greater than 50,000 SF.
This Study assumes an average of 50%"pass-by"trip reduction.
Cost Summary
The Citywide Transportation Fee will fund the expansion of transportation facilities necessary to
serve new growth. The transportation facilities listed in Table 8-1 have total DIF eligible project
costs estimated to be approximately$162.6 million.
Fee Methodology
The Transportation Fee uses the planned facilities method to calculate the fee. The planned
facilities method calculates the fee based on the planned facilities associated with new
development. This method is appropriate when planned facilities are mostly for the benefit of new
development, such as a road extension to a previously undeveloped area.
The Transportation Fee is calculated based on the cost per trip generated by new development.
The total cost of the facilities identified in Table 8-1 is spread over the anticipated number of trips
that will be generated by future development(as shown in Table 8-3) to calculate the cost per trip.
Development Impact Fee Nexus Study 39 July 2023
City of Moorpark
Resolution No. 2023-4196
Page 49
To calculate the total number of new trips attributable to new development through Buildout, the
growth projections, detailed within Table 3-2,are multiplied by the corresponding trip generation
rates identified in Table 8-2. Table 8-2 displays the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE)
trip generation rates for the land use types within this fee program. The multi-family assumption
is an average of the multi-family attached 2-4 rate and multifamily attached 4+ rate. The non-
residential land use ITE rates are assessed per employee.
Residential trips were calculated by multiplying the anticipated growth in residential units by the
corresponding single family and multi-family trip generation rates. Non-residential trips were
calculated by multiplying the anticipated growth in employees by the corresponding trip
generation rates for each of the land uses. The ITE Trip Generation Manual, 11 th Edition notes all
Retail and Services land uses are entitled to a "pass-by" trip reduction between 40%-60%. This
study assumes the average with a 50% trip reduction for commercial. Table 8-3 shows the
breakdown of the total trips attributed to new development through Buildout condition.
Table 8-3: New Development Trip Generation
Trip
Generation Total Trip
Land Use Category Projected Growth Assumption Generation
Residential(Units)
Single Family 569 9.43 5,366
Multi-Family 4,385 5.64 24,731
Subtotal Residential Trips 30,097
Non-Residential(Employees)
Commercial 1 2,191 8,71 19,080
Office 1,180 3.33 3,930
Industrial 944 5.05 4,768
Subtotal Non-Residential Trips 27,777
Total Additional Trips 57,875
Source:ITE Trip Generation Manual,11.1 Edition.
1 ITE 11th Edition notes:All land uses in the retail &services are entitled to a "pass-by"trip
reduction of 60%if less than 50,000 SF or a reduction of 40%if equal to or greater than 50,000 SF.
This Study assumes a 50%"pass-by"trip reduction.
The cost per trip is calculated by taking the total cost of the DIF eligible transportation facilities,
subtracting the other anticipated funding sources, and the current transportation fund balances
attributed to the eligible DIF projects, and then dividing by the trips generated by new
development. This calculation is shown in Table 8-4.
Development Impact Fee Nexus Study 40 July 2023
City of Moorpark
Resolution No. 2023-4196
Page 50
Table 8-4: Cost per Trip
Cost per Trip
Total Cost of Transportation Facilities $137,074,837
Less:LA AOC Fund Balance2
($8,975,494)
Less:SP/TR AOC Fund Balance2 ($128,197)
Less:Citywide Traffic Mitigation Con ($472,403)
Less:Traffic System Management Cc ($224,106)
Total Cost of Fee Program
Transportation Facilities $127,274,637
Future Trip Generation 57,875
Cost per Trip $2,199
1 Projected cost based upon CIP 22-23 Budget.
2 Fund balance as of November 30, 2022.
Fee Summary
The Traffic Fee for new development is calculated by multiplying the cost per trip identified in
Table 8-4 by trip generation rate for each land use. The total fee includes a five percent (5%)
administrative charge to fund fee program administrative costs, including but not limited to
preparing annual reports, preparing fee updates, and other administrative tasks related to the fee
program administration. The residential fee per unit is converted to a fee per square foot by
dividing the fee per unit by the unit size estimated in Table 3-5. Table 8-5 shows the proposed
new traffic fees for new development.
Table 8-5: Citywide Transportation Fee Summary
Cost Trip Employees Subtotal Administration Total Fee
Land Use Per Trip Generation) per 1,000 SF Fee Fee (Rounded) Total Fee
Residential (per Unit) (per SF)
Single Family $2,199 9.43 NA $20,737 $1,037 $21,774 $8.71
Multi-Family(2-4 units) $2,199 5.64 NA $12,402 $620 $13,022 $9.30
Non-Residential (Fee per 1,000 SF)
Commercial $2,199 8.71 1.00 $19,153 $958 $20,111
Office $2,199 3.33 2.00 $14,645 $732 $15,377
Industrial $2,199 5.05 0.40 $4,442 $222 $4,664
1 ITE 11.1 Edition Daily Trip Generation Rate.ITE 11th Edition notes:All land uses in the retail&services are entitled to a "pass•by"
trip reduction of 60%if less than S0,000 SF ora reduction of 40%if equal to orgreater than 50,000 SF.This Study assumes a 50%"pass
by"trip reduction.
Reduced Traffic Fee
Residential developments within one-half mile of transit stations generate fewer trips than
traditional land use configurations that rely on vehicles as the primary mode of transportation.
Development Impact Fee Nexus Study 41 July 2023
City of Moorpark
Resolution No. 2023-4196
Page 51
According to various transportation studies, measurable trip reductions result for projects that are
near transit stations and where there are a diversity of land uses that promote connectivity and
walkability. To account for the reduced trip rates generated by projects meeting the above criteria,
an additional trip adjustment factor is applied to new residential land uses meeting the following
criteria:
1. The housing development is located within one-half mile of a transit station and there
is direct access between the project and the transit station along a barrier-free walkable
pathway not exceeding one-half mile in length.
2. Convenience retail uses, including a store that sells food, are located within one-half
mile of the housing development.
3. The housing development provides either the minimum number of parking spaces
required by the local ordinance,or for residential units,no more than one onsite parking
space for zero to two bedroom units, and two onsite parking spaces for three or more
bedroom units,whichever is less.
For purposes of this reduction, the definition of transit station shall be defined by California
Government Code Section 65460.1, "Transit station" means a rail or light-rail station, ferry
terminal, bus hub, or bus transfer station. Also, a "housing development" shall be defined by
California Government Code Section 66005.1, which is a development project with common
ownership and financing consisting of residential use or mixed use where not less than 50 percent
of the floorspace is for residential use.
Commercial trips often coincide with other trips (i.e., Person A stops by the store on their way
home from work, Person B stops by a restaurant after grocery shopping, etc.) This "pass-by" trip
reduction amount is factored into the Commercial trip generation estimates(Table 8-2) as well as
the fee for commercial land use in Table 8-5.
Revenue Projections
Table 8-6 summarizes the anticipated Citywide Transportation Fee revenue collected at Buildout.
The revenue will be used to fund the transportation facilities show on Table 8-1.
Development Impact Fee Nexus Study 42 July 2023
City of Moorpark
Resolution No. 2023-4196
Page 52
Table 8-6: Anticipated Citywide Transportation Fee Collection at Buildout
Anticipated
Anticipated Fee
Proposed Growth Anticipated Collection at
Land Use Feel (units) Growth (SF) Buildout2
Residential (Fee per Dwelling Unit)
Single Family $8.30 569 1,422,500 $11,806,750
Multi-Family $8.86 4,385 6,139,000 $54,391,540
Non-Residential (Fee per 1,000 SF)
Commercial $19,153 n/a 2,190,538 $41,955,374
Office $14,645 n/a 590,085 $8,641,795
Industrial $4,442 n/a 2,360,343 $10,484,644
Total $127,280,103
I Excludes the adnynistrative portion of the fee.
2 Total fee revenue may differ slightly from cost attributable to fee program due to rounding.
Nexus Requirement Summary
The proposed Citywide Transportation Fee meets the Mitigation Fee Act Requirements, as
described in this section.
Requirement 1:Identify the purpose of the fee.
The purpose of the Citywide Transportation Fee is to fund planned transportation facilities
included in Table 8-1 to serve future development. In order to accommodate this need, new
facilities must be built and/or existing facilities expanded.
Requirement 2:Identify the use of the fee.
The fee will be used to fund the planned transportation facilities identified in Table 8-1, that are
necessary to serve increased transportation demand. The improvements were identified through
the current City CIP, City General Plan Update, and City discussions, as the facilities that are
required to mitigate the impact of new development in the City.
Requirement 3:Determine how there is a reasonable relationship between the fee's use and the
type of development project on which the fee is imposed.
The Citywide Transportation Fees will be used to fund the new transportation facilities and
improvements that are necessary to serve the increase in transportation demand due to new
development. The cost of the transportation improvements is spread to each land use based on the
number of trips generated by each land use. This correlation to trips ensures that each new
development pays their fair share of the transportation costs.
The cost per trip calculations is shown in Table 8-4. The fee calculation is shown in Table 8-5.
Development Impact Fee Nexus Study 43 July 2023
City of Moorpark
Resolution No. 2023-4196
Page 53
Requirement 4: Determine how there is a reasonable relationship between the need for the
public facility and the type of development project on which the fee is imposed.
Each new residential and non-residential development within the City will generate additional trips
that incrementally adds to the need for new traffic infrastructure and facilities to serve the increased
residents and businesses within the City and ensure that traffic facilities can accommodate the
increased demand. These facilities are identified in the current City CIP,City General Plan Update,
and through City discussions. Each new residential and non-residential development pays an
impact fee based on the additional trips that is expected to be generated by the new development.
To accommodate these additional trips, new transportation improvements will be needed city-
wide. Utilizing trips generated by each development ensures that each type of development pays
their fair share of the required new transportation facilities. This calculation is shown in Table 8-
5.
Requirement 5: Determine how there is a reasonable relationship between the amount of the
fee and the cost of the public facility or portion of the public facility attributable to the
development on which the fee is imposed.
The transportation facilities that are necessary for the new development are summarized in the
planned improvements presented in Table 8-1. Each land use pays their fair share of costs based
on the number of trips generated by that land use as shown in Table 8-3. Contributions from other
fee programs for the same facilities and fund balances are subtracted out from the total costs, as
shown in Table 8-1 and Table 8-4, to ensure that future land uses only pays their fair share of the
traffic improvements. The cost per trip is then spread to each land use based on the ITE Trip
Generation Rates. This calculation is shown in Table 8-5. Utilizing trips ensures that each
development pays their fair share of the cost.
Development Impact Fee Nexus Study 44 July 2023
City of Moorpark
Resolution No. 2023-4196
Page 54
Section 9 Implementation and Administration
Implementation
According to the California Government Code,prior to levying a new fee or increasing an existing
fee, an agency must hold at least one open and public meeting with at least 30 days' notice. In
addition,notice of the time and place of the meeting, including a general explanation of the matter
to be considered,and a statement that the data required by this section is available, shall be mailed
at least 14 days prior to the meeting to any interested party who files a written request with the
local agency for mailed notice of the meeting on new or increased fees or service charges. Any
written request for mailed notices shall be valid for one year from the date on which it is filed
unless a renewal request is filed.At least ten days prior to this meeting,the agency must make data
on infrastructure costs and funding sources available to the public.Notice of the time and place of
the meeting and a general explanation of the matter are to be published in accordance with Section
6062a of the Government Code, which states that publication of notice shall occur for ten days in
a newspaper regularly published once a week or more. The new or increased fees shall be effective
no earlier than 60 days following the final action on the adoption or increase of the fees.
Fee Program Administrative Requirements
The Government Code requires the City to report every year and every fifth year certain financial
information regarding the fees. The City must make available within 180 days after the last day of
each fiscal year the following information from the prior fiscal year:
1. A brief description of the type of fee in the account or fund.
2. The amount of the fee.
3. The beginning and ending balance in the account or fund.
4. The amount of the fee collected and the interest earned.
5. An identification of each public improvement for which fees were expended and the
amount of expenditures.
6. An identification of an approximate date by which time construction on the
improvement will commence if it is determined that sufficient funds exist to complete
the project.
7. A description of each interfund transfer or loan made from the account and when it will
be repaid.
8. Identification of any refunds made once it is determined that sufficient monies have
been collected to fund all fee related projects.
The City must make this information available for public review and must also present it at the
next regularly scheduled public meeting not less than 15 days after this information is made
available to the public.
Development Impact Fee Nexus Study 45 July 2023
City of Moorpark
Resolution No. 2023-4196
Page 55
For the fifth fiscal year following the first deposit into the account or fund, and every five years
thereafter, the City must make the following findings with respect to any remaining funds in the
fee account, regardless of whether those funds are committed or uncommitted:
1. Identify the purpose to which the fee is to be put.
2. Demonstrate a reasonable relationship between the fee and the purpose for which it
is charged.
3. Identify all sources and amounts of funding anticipated to complete financing any
incomplete improvements.
4. Designate the approximate dates on which funding in item (3) above is expected to be
deposited into the fee account.
As with the annual disclosure, the five-year report must be made public within 180 days after the
end of the City's fiscal year and must be reviewed at the next regularly scheduled public meeting.
Fee Adjustment Procedures
The DIFs may be adjusted periodically to reflect revised facility requirements, receipt of funding
from alternative sources (i.e., state, or federal grants), revised facilities or costs, changes in
demographics, changes in the average unit square footage, or changes in the land use plan. In
addition, in July of each calendar year, the fees will automatically be adjusted using the
Construction Cost Index (CCI) for the Los Angeles Region as reported by Engineering News
Record(ENR)for the twelve-month period ending in May or a similar published index if the CC1
Index is no longer available. For example, the adjustment for July 2024 will be determined by
taking the percentage change of the Los Angeles construction cost index from May 2023 to May
2024.
Timing of Fee Payment
Fees will be collected at the time the building permit for the project is issued. All residential
projects will pay a fee based on the livable square footage of the residential unit(s). For high-
density residential projects,the fee will be due at the time of the building permit for each building.
For high-density residential projects, the non-residential communal portion (i.e., clubhouse,
maintenance facility, gym, etc.) will not be assessed impact fees as the impact is assumed to be
captured in the residential fees. Area that are accessible by the public (i.e., leasing office) will be
charged impact fees according to use.
Credits and Reimbursement Policies
The City may provide fee credits or reimbursements to developers who dedicate land or construct
eligible facilities. Fee credits or reimbursements may be provided up to the cost of the
improvement, as shown in this study, subject to periodic inflation adjustments, or the actual cost
paid by the developer,whichever is lower. For construction cost overruns,only that amount shown
Development Impact Fee Nexus Study 46 July 2023
City of Moorpark
I
Resolution No. 2023-4196
Page 56
in the fee study, subject to periodic inflation adjustments, would be credited or reimbursed. The
City will evaluate the appropriate fee credit or reimbursement based on the value of the dedication
or improvement. Credits or reimbursements may be repaid based on the priority of the capital
improvements,as determined by the City. The City will determine fee credits and reimbursements
on a case-by-case basis and possibly through the use of a development agreement.
Administrative Fee
An administrative fee of five (5) percent is included as part of each of the fees and may be used
for costs for legal, accounting, and other administrative support and development impact fee
program administration costs including revenue collection,revenue and cost accounting,mandated
public reporting, and fee justification analysis. The administration fee is included within each fee.
Please refer to the individual fee calculation tables for a breakdown of the administration fee.
Programming Revenues with the CIP
The City should maintain its CIP to adequately plan for future infrastructure needs. The CIP should
commit all projected fee revenues and fund balances to specific projects that are necessary to serve
growth as described in this report. The use of the CIP provides documentation necessary for the
City to hold funds in a project account for longer than five years if necessary to collect sufficient
funds to complete a project. In addition, the CIP is required per AB602. This report outlines the
projects that are to be funded with the fee program and forms the basis of the CIP, as shown in
Appendix A.
Fee Reporting
Assembly Bill No. 1483,which became effective January 1, 2020,requires that public agencies make
the following information available on their website. The following information must be provided:
1. A current schedule of fees, exactions, and affordability requirements imposed by the
city, county, or special district, including any dependent special districts, of the city or
county applicable to a proposed housing development project,which shall be presented
in a manner that clearly identifies the fees, exactions, and affordability requirements
that apply to each parcel.
2. All zoning ordinances and development standards, which shall specify the zoning,
design, and development standards that apply to each parcel.
3. The list of information required to be compiled pursuant to Section 65940.
4. The current and five previous annual fee reports or the current and five previous annual
financial reports, which were required pursuant to subdivision.
5. An archive of impact fee nexus studies,cost of service studies,or equivalent,conducted
by the city, county, or special district on or after January 1,2018.
Any updates to the above information must be available within 30 days.
Development Impact Fee Nexus Study 47 July 2023
City of Moorpark
Resolution No. 2023-4196
Page 57
Accessory Dwelling Units
An accessory dwelling unit (ADU) is a second unit that is attached or detached from a single-
family home. In accordance with Assembly Bill No. 881 approved on October 9, 2019, fees will
not be charged for an ADU that is less than 750 square feet. For an ADU that is 750 square feet or
larger, the ADU will be charged proportionately in relation to the square footage of the primary
dwelling unit. Since the residential fees are now being charged on a square footage basis, ADU
fees will be calculated by multiplying the Single-Family Residential fee by the ADU's square
footage.
Specialized Development Projects
The fees in this report may not apply to specialized development projects such as golf courses,
cemeteries, sports stadium, or other specialized land uses. For specialized development projects
the City will review the development's impacts to determine the applicable fees. The fee rates
presented in this Nexus Study may be reduced, exempted, or waived under certain circumstances
as determined by the City. Any exemption or reduction in fees will be based on the City's
independent analysis and review of the subject property. In addition, for reuse, density increasing,
or rezone projects, the developer shall only be responsible for paying fees for the intensification
of the development. In cases of disaster, impact fees will not be charged on the rebuilding of the
structures that were affected by the disaster to the extent that the overall size and use of the new
structure is similar to the structure destroyed by the disaster. The City will review the
development's increased impacts to determine the applicable fees.
Some developments may include more than one land use type. In these cases,the fee is calculated
separately for each land use. The City has the discretion to impose the fees based on the specific
aspects of a proposed development regardless of zoning. The fee imposed should be based on the
land use type that most closely represents the impacts of the development.
Rebuild or Expansion Projects
For reuse, expansions, density increasing, or rezone projects, the developer shall only be
responsible for paying fees for the intensification or expansion. For example, if a homeowner
wishes to build an addition to their home that is 100 square feet, the homeowner would be
responsible for paying fees for the 100 square foot addition. The City will review the new
development's impacts to determine the applicable fees on a case by case basis.
In cases of rebuilding a structure after a demolition, impact fees will not be assessed on the rebuild
to the extent that the overall size and use of the new structure is similar to the structure prior to
demolition. Similarly, in cases of disaster, impact fees will not be charged on the rebuilding of the
structures that were affected by the disaster to the extent that the overall size and use of the new
structure is the same as the structure destroyed by the disaster. Impact fees will be calculated on
Development Impact Fee Nexus Study 48 July 2023
City of Moorpark
Resolution No. 2023-4196
Page 58
the new rebuilt structure and the previous structure and the difference of fees will be assessed. No
refunds will be made for rebuilds that have less impact fees than the previous structure.
Development Impact Fee Nexus Study 49 July 2023
City of Moorpark
Resolution No. 2023-4196
Page 59
Appendix A: Capital Improvement Plan
Development Impact Fee Nexus Study 50 July 2023
City of Moorpark
Resolution No. 2023-4196
Page 60
Table A-1: Capital Improvement Plan
Other Funding Sources/
Item Total Project Cost Amount Expended DIF Project Cost
Library(4,500 SF Expansion) $7,714,305 n/a $7,714,305
Park&Recreation
Park Facilities(Assumes 59.97 acres)' $39,611,533 n/a $39,611,533
Recreation Facilities $4,972,101 n/a $4,972,101
Total Park&Recreation Costs $44,583,634 $0 $44,583,634
City Hall (New City Hall Facility) $46,899,880 $33,838,458 $13,061,422
Police Facilities
Moorpark Police Services Center
Repayment $21,489,515 $15,504,774 $5,984,741
Patrol Vehicles/Equipment $51,513 n/a $51,513
Total Police Facilities Costs $21,541,028 $15,504,774 $6,036,254
Transportation
Moorpark Ave Widening Project(Casey to $2,815,620 $2,343,217 $472,403
Third)- Includes street realignment at First
St and Poindexter Ave(Prior Project 8057)
and Rail Crossing Improvements (Prior
Project 8038)
LA Avenue Widening -Spring Road to $5,000,681 $4,074,726 $925,955
Moorpark Ave
Spring Road Widening $1,249,934 $475,366 $774,568
Route 23 North Alignment(Study) $192,325 $192,325 $0
Underground Utility District No. 2 $1,710,240 $240 $1,710,000
il LA Avenue Widening-Shasta Avenue $1,688,147 $1,678,147 $10,000
Los Angeles Avenue Undergrounding $468,001 $26,694 $441,307
Arroyo Drive Bike/Ped Project $1,030,000 $806,180 $223,820
LA Ave Traffic Signals/Fiber Optic Upgrade $950,000 $14,345 $935,655
North Hills Parkway Overcrossing State $128,413,129 $0 $128,413,129
Route 233
Realignment Study for Moorpark Ave- TBD $0 $0
Poindexter/First
Moorpark Ave Sound Walls $3,168,000 $0 $3,168,000
Total Transportation Facilities Costs $146.686,077 $9,611,240 $137,074,837
1 The assumed park average is based on the General Plan standard for parks.Includes park facilities.Land cost is separate.
Development Impact Fee Nexus Study 51 July 2023
City of Moorpark
i
Resolution No. 2023-4196
Page 61
City of Moorpark
o,;PPaK c4�
ZiphpVilli "11157
iwril
Zj 4 }a?��j
Schedule of Fees and Service Charges
Effective November 5, 2023
Resolution No. 2023-4196
Page 62
City of Moorpark
Schedule of Fees and Service Charges
Table of Contents
Fees Page
ADMINISTRATION FEES 1
MOORPARK CITY TRANSIT FARES 2
ANIMAL COMPLIANCE PROGRAM FEES 3
BUSINESS REGISTRATION FEES 4
BUILDING&SAFETY FEES 5
DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES 16
PLANNING FEES 17
PUBLIC WORKS ENGINEERING AND ENCROACHMENT PERMIT FEES 22
COMMERCIAL FILMING AND PHOTOGRAPHY PERMIT FEES 26
FACILITY RENTAL FEES 27
ELECTRIC USE FEES-VEHICLE CHARGING AND COURT LIGHTING 34
LIBRARY SERVICES FEES AND FINES 35
POLICE SERVICES FEES 36
PARKING CITATION FINES 37
REAL TIME BILLING RATES 39
Resolution No. 2023-4196
Page 63
City of Moorpark
ADMINISTRATION FEES
Fee Description Fee Charge Basis Note
1 Returned Check Fee;EFT/ACH Return/Error $25 each [a)
2 Wire Transfer Fee
a)Outgoing $25 each
b)Incoming No Charge each
3 Postage Actual Cost each
4 Digital Media Device $10 each
5 Documents-Hard Copy
a)Standard Size-Black and White Up to 11"x 17" $0.10 per single-sided page
b)Standard Size-Color Up to 11"x 17" $0.25 per single-sided page
c)Non-standard Size
i)Printed In-House Actual Cost-See Real Time per request
Billing Rates
ii)Printed by Private Company Direct Cost+15% per request
Administrative Fee
6 Agendas,Maps,Recordings Available Online each
7 Copy Retrieval Fee(for copies of reports and statements filed $5 per request
pursuant to the Political Reform Act,which are five or more years
8 Subpoena Response/Retrieval/Appearance Fees Max.Authorized by State per request
9 Requests Requiring Special Programming or Formatting or Use of Actual Cost Including Cost per request (b];(c]
Outside Service Providers of Digital Devices
10 City Overhead-Administrative Fee(Amount Added to Time& 15%of Actual Cost as needed
Materials and Direct Cost Billings)
[a)California Civil Code Sec.1719.
(b)This fee applies to the creation of a new document or information not normally prepared,owned,used or retained by the City as part of the conduct of
the Public's business. Fee also includes cost of any digital devices used to provide requested information.
[c]See schedule of schedule of City billing rates.
Resolution No. 2023-4196
Page 64
City of Moorpark
CITY TRANSIT FEES
Fee Description Fee Note
Dial-A-Ride Fares
1 Persons Aged 65+and who are registered for the service with the City:one-way $2
paratransit trip with a pick-up and destination within the City
2 Persons Aged 65+and who are registered for the service with the City:ECTA InterCity As established by the
service for a one-way paratransit trip to or from Agoura Hills,Camarillo,Oak Park,Simi ECTA Management Committee
Valley,Thousand Oaks,Westlake Village,and surrounding County Unincorporated areas
3 Persons with disabilities who are certified under the Americans with Disabilities Act $2
(ADA)as eligible for complementary paratransit service:one-way paratransit trip with a
pick-up and destination within the City
4 Persons with disabilities who are registered for the service with the City:ECTA InterCity As established by the
service for a one-way paratransit trip to or from Agoura Hills,Camarillo,Oak Park,Simi ECTA Management Committee
Valley,Thousand Oaks,Westlake Village,and surrounding County Unincorporated areas
5 Personal Care Assistants(PCA)for a certified ADA rider:If the PCA's trip origin and Free
destination match the ADA rider's
Fixed Route Bus Fares
6 One-Way Ride $1
7 Child(5 or Younger),when accompanied by a parent,guardian,or responsible person Free
aged 16+
8 Individual Aged 65+ Free
9 Individual with a Disability Free
10 Personal Care Assistants(PCA)for a certified ADA rider:If the PCA's trip origin and Free
destination match the ADA rider's
Note:The City Manager is authorized to establish special promotional fare offers,discounts,or passes from time to time(such as a Summer Youth
Pass or a Rider Appreciation Day fare holiday),for the purpose of promoting public transit ridership and good community relations.
Resolution No. 2023-4196
Page 65
City of Moorpark
ANIMAL COMPLIANCE PROGRAM FEES
Fee Description Fee Charge Basis Note
License Fees:Dogs and Cats
1 Altered,1 year license $30 per license
2 Altered,2 year license $60 per license
3 Altered,3 year license $90 per license
4 Altered,1 year license-(Owner 55+) $15 per license
S Altered,2 year license-(Owner 55+) $30 per license
6 Altered,3 year license-(Owner 55+) $45 per license
7 Unaltered,1 year license $105 per license
8 Unaltered,2 year license $210 per license
9 Unaltered,3 year license $315 per license
10 Late Penalty-For License Fees 30 Days or More Past Due 100%of
License Fee
Pick-Up and Disposal:Household Pets
(as defined in MMC Chapter 6.04 weighing up to 75 pounds)
11 Dogs and Cats
a)Licensed $65
b)Unlicensed $90
12 Fowl,Rodents,Birds,and Other Small Household Pets $65
13 Household Pets Owned or Kept by a Person Aged 55+ $25
Pick-Up and Disposal:Other Than Household Pets
14 No Charge for Dead,Wild,or Stray Animals On Private Property Not Owned or No Charge
Kept by the Property Owner or Occupant
Humane Trap Rental
15 Refundable deposit to Moorpark residents for trap use within the City of $40
Moorpark
Other Services
16 Services rendered by City Vector/Animal Control staff not otherwise listed In
this document shall be charged pursuant to the current Ventura County Animal
Services Fee Schedule.
Resolution No. 2023-4196
Page 66
City of Moorpark
BUSINESS REGISTRATION FEES
Fee Description Fee Charge Basis Note
Business Registration
1 Initial Business Registrations
a)Standard Business Registration $115 Fixed Fee
b)Business Registration for Vendor at City-Permitted Swap $58 Fixed Fee
Meet/Farmers'Market
c)Business Registration for Owner Under 18 with Annual Income No Charge Fixed Fee
<$10,000
2 Annual Renewal of Business Registration $40 Fixed Fee
3 State CASp Fee(Applies to All Business Registrations) $4 Fixed Fee
4 Vehicle Stickers for Mobile Businesses $2 Fixed Fee
Resolution No. 2023-4196
Page 67
City of Moorpark
BUILDING & SAFETY FEES
Valuation for
Description Fee Setting Charge Basis Note
Building&Safety Valuations(per sq.ft.)
1 Balconies and Covered Porches and Remodels One Third of the Dwelling Value $51.59
2 Block Walls Over 42"High $10.15
3 Decks More Than 30"Above Grade $27.07
4 Garages,Private,Attached $60.31
5 Garages,Private,Detached $60.31
6 Open Trellises and Solid or Lattice Patio Covers,Gazebos $48.59
7 Retaining Walls,Caisson and Grade Bm. $40.60
8 Retaining Walls,Conventional Footing $25.38
9 Re-Roof Residential and Commercial $3.38
10 Re-Roof with Engineering Additional for Plan Check $5.67
11 Skylights $40.65 Fee Each
12 Solatube $40.65 Fee Each
13 Window Change Out $40.65 Fee Each
14 Other Occupancies-The valuation shall be calculated using the latest version of
the International Code Council Valuation Table with the latest edition of Marshall
and Swift Construction Cost Handbook Local Multiplier for Ventura County.
15 Other Work-Shall be valued by the Building Official based upon his or her
estimate of the cost of the construction and his or her estimate of the cost of
inspection and plan review
Note 1:The valuations above shall be modified as indicated for:
a)Hillside Foundations Increase 5.20%
b)Shell Only Decrease 20%
c)Tenant Improvement,General 20%
d)Tenant Improvement,Restaurants 40%
Note 2:The determination of valuation under any of the provisions of the Code shall be
made by the Building Official and shall include the value of all construction work,
including finish work,roofing,elevators,etc.(See California Building Code).
Resolution No. 2023-4196
Page 68
City of Moorpark
BUILDING & SAFETY FEES
Building Permit Fees
Total Valuation Permit Fee
$1 to $500 $29.93
$501 to $1,000 $29.93 for the first$500 plus $3.90 for each add'l$100 or fraction
thereof, to and including$1,000
$1,001 to $5,000 $49.45 for the first$1,000 plus $16.92 for each add'I$1,000 or fraction
thereof, to and including$5,000
$5,001 to $10,000 $117.12 for the first$5,000 plus $15.62 for each add'I$1,000 or fraction
thereof, to and including$10,000
$10,001 to $50,000 $195.21 for the first$10,000 plus $15.62 for each addl$1,000 or fraction
thereof,to and including$50,000
$50,001 to $100,000 $819.86 for the first$50,000 plus $10.41 for each add'I$1,000 or fraction
thereof, to and including$100,000
$100,001 to $500,000 $1,340.41 for the first$100,000 plus $7.81 for each add'I$1,000 or fraction
thereof,to and including$500,000
$500,001 to $1,000,000 $4,463.70 for the first$500,000 plus $6.95 for each add'I$1,000 or fraction
thereof,to and including$1,000,000
$1,000,001 and up $7,938.36 for the first$1,000,000 plus $5.21 for each additional $1,000 or fraction
thereof over$1,000,000
7
Resolution No. 2023-4196
Page 69
City of Moorpark
BUILDING & SAFETY FEES
Fee Description Fee Note
Building Permit Fees,Continued
1 Permit Issuance Fee $35
2 Minimum Building Permit Fee $60
3 Minimum Demolition Permit Fee $190
Building Plan Check Fees
4 Plan Review Fee 75%of Building Permit Fee
5 Energy Conservation Fee(where compliance with CA Energy Conservation 10%of Building Permit Fee
Law required)
6 Disabled Access Fee(where compliance with CA Access Law required) 10%of Building Permit Fee
7 Green Building Mandatory Measures Fee(where compliance with CA Green 8%of Building Permit Fee
Building Code required)
8 Green Building Tier 1 and 2 Fee (where compliance with CA Green Building 10%of Building Permit Fee
Code Tier 1 or 2 requested)
Other Fees
9 Strong Motion Instrumentation(SMI) Fee Calculation
a)Category 1 Construction (1 to 3 Story Residential) Greater of$0.50 or valuation x [a]
.00013
b)Category 2 Construction(Over 3 story Residential and all Commercial) Greater of$0.50 or valuation x [b]
.00028
10 Building Standards(SB 1473) Fee Calculation (Valuation)
a)$1-$25,000 $1
b)$25,001-$50,000 $2
c)$50,001-$75,000 $3
d)$75,001-$100,000 $4
e)Each Add'I$25,000 or fraction thereof Add$1
11 Technology Enhancement Fee 6%of Permit Fee
12 Advance Planning Fee(for Valuations$10,000+) 6%of Building Permit Fee
[a)Category 1 Construction includes residential buildings 1 to 3 stories in height,excluding hotels and motels,Single family houses,duplexes and
quadruplexes are considered Category 1.Condominiums and apartment buildings which are 3 stories or less in height are considered Category 1,
(b]Category 2 Construction includes all buildings not considered Category 1(i.e.residential buildings over 3 stories,all office buildings,
warehouses,factories and other manufacturing or processing facilities, restaurants,and other non-residential buildings).
Resolution No. 2023-4196
Page 70
City of Moorpark
BUILDING &SAFETY FEES
Fee Description Fee Charge Basis Note
Electrical Permit Fees
1 Permit Issuance Fee $35
2 Minimum Electrical Permit Fee $60
3 Plan Review Fee 50% Percent of
Permit Fee
Systems(per sq.ft)
4 For One and Two Family Dwellings $0.10
S For Multi Family Residential $0.10
6 Manufacturing $0.10
7 Commercial $0.17
8 Business and Assembly $0.10
J
9 Agricultural $0.03
Unit Fees
10 Temp.Service Up to 200A $47
11 Temp.Service Over 200A $61
12 Sub-Panels $47 Each
13 Services
a)For 600V up to 200A $47
b)For 200A to 1,000A $190
c)For over 600V or Over 1,000A $338
14 Annual Electrical Maintenance $118
15 Busways(Each 100 ft.or Fraction Thereof) $23
16 lighting Outlet or Fixture $1.17 Each
17 Light Poles $10 Each
18 Misc.Apparatus,Conduits,and Conductors $23 Each
19 Non-Residential Appliance $25 Each
20 Power Apparatus Rated in JP,KW,KVA,or KVAR
a)Up to 1 HP $23 Each
b)Over 1 HP $72 Each
21 Receptacle Switch or Outlet $1.17 Each
22 Residential Appliance $9 Each
23 Signs and Marquees $14 Each
Resolution No. 2023-4196
Page 71
City of Moorpark
BUILDING &SAFETY FEES
Fee Description Fee Charge Basis Note
24 Photovoltaic Systems
a)Residential
i)Up to 15kW DC $190
ii)Greater than 15kW DC $380
b)Non-Residential
i)0-100kW DC $380
ii)101-500kW DC
a)For the First 100kW DC $380
b)Each Additional kW up to 500kW $1.30
iii)Greater than 500kW DC
a)For the First 500kW DC $900
b)Each Additional kW DC $1.00
25 Energy Storage System Batteries $23 Each
26 Transfer Switches $47 Each
27 Load Centers $47 Each
28 Combiner Boxes $47 Each
Other
29 Fees for Services Not Listed in this Fee Schedule $190 Per Hour
Resolution No. 2023-4196
Page 72
City of Moorpark
BUILDING &SAFETY FEES
Fee Description he Charge Basis Note
Mechanical Permit Fees
1 Permit Issuance Fee $35
2 Minimum Mechanical Permit Fee $60
3 Plan Review Fee 50% Percent of
Permit Fee
System Fees
4 Residential Heating System(per sq.ft.of Conditioned Space) $0.05
Unit Fees
5 Air Handler or Ventilation Unit $14 Each
6 Boiler(Generates Steam) $118 Each
7 Boiler Chimney(Metal) $14 Each
8 Combination Heating/Cooling Unit(i.e.Heat Pump Unit) $43 Each
9 Commercial/Industrial Incinerator $130 Each
10 Commercial Kitchen Hood $95 Each
11 Cooling Tower and Related Piping $17 Each
12 Cooling Unit(Self Contained Unit,No Refrigeration Connection) $29 Each
13 Duct Systems for Heating or Cooling(per sq.ft.of Area Served) $0.03 Each
14 Evaporative Cooling Unit with Ducts $17 Each
15 Fire Dampers
a)1-10 Dampers $31 Each
b)Over 10 Dampers $9 Each
16 Heating Appliance $29 Each
17 Incidental Gas Piping or Electrical Wiring $17 Each
18 Incinerator Chimney $29 Each
19 Other Appliances and Equipment $14 Each
20 Refrigeration Units
a)Up to 25 HP $14 Each
b)Over 25 HP $57 Each
21 Residential Exhaust Fan $8 Each
22 Single Flue or Vent Servicing an Appliance $14 Each
Other
23 Fees for Services Not Listed in this Fee Schedule $190 Per Hour
Resolution No. 2023-4196
Page 73
City of Moorpark
BUILDING &SAFETY FEES
Fee Description Fee (barge tlasis Note
Plumbing Permit Fees
1 Permit Issuance Fee $35
2 Minimum Plumbing Permit Fee $60
3 Plan Review Fee 50% Percent of
Permit Fee
System Fees
4 Single Family Dwellings $113 Each
5 Solar Water Heating $72 Each
Unit Fees
6 Annual Maintenance $118
7 Building Sewer $95 Each
8 Fire Sprinklers(per sq.ft.) $4
9 Fixture or Trap $8 Each
10 Gas System
a)Up to 4 Outlets $17 Each
b)Outlets Over 4 $4 Each
11 Interceptors and Clarifiers $107 Each
12 Misc.Repairs $8 Each
13 Storm Water Drains Inside Building(per Drain) $14 Each
14 Vacuum Breaker or Backflow Preventer $14 Each
15 Water Heater $23 Each
16 Water Service Piping $17 Each
17 Water Treatment Equipment $8 Each
Other
18 Fees for Services Not Listed in this Fee Schedule $190 Per Hour
Resolution No. 2023-4196
Page 74
City of Moorpark
BUILDING &SAFETY FEES
Fee Description Fee Charge Basis Note
Sign Permit Fees and Valuations for Fee Setting
1 Signs-Wall Mounted,No Electrical
a)Valuation(per sq.ft.) $127
b)Electrical Permit n/a
c)SMIP Fee Greater of$0.50 or
valuation x.00028
2 Signs-Wall Mounted,Electrical
a)Valuation(per sq.ft.) $127
b)Electrical Permit $24
c)SMIP Fee Greater of$0.50 or
valuation x.00028
3 Signs-With Footings,No Electrical
a)Valuation(per sq.ft.) $127
b)Electrical Permit n/a
c)SMIP Fee Greater of$0.50 or
valuation x.00028
4 Signs-With Footings,Electrical
a)Valuation(per sq.ft.) $127
b)Electrical Permit $24
c)SMIP Fee Greater of$0.50 or
valuation x.00028
Resolution No. 2023-4196
Page 75
City of Moorpark
BUILDING & SAFETY FEES
Fee Description Fee Charge Basis Note
Swimming Pool and Spa Permit Fees and Valuations for Fee Setting
1 Residential Pool
a)Valuation(per sq.ft.) $63
b)Permit Fee See Permit Fee Table
c)Permit Issuance Fee $35
d)Plan Check Fee 75% percent of permit fee
e)Electrical Permit Fee $71
f)Plumbing Permit Fee $123
g)SMIP Fee Greater of$0.50 or
valuation x.00013
2 Residential Spa
a)Valuation(per sq.ft.) $63
b)Permit Fee See Permit Fee Table
c)Permit Issuance Fee $35
d)Plan Check Fee 75% percent of permit fee
e)Electrical Permit Fee $71
f)Plumbing Permit Fee $123
g)SMIP Fee Greater of$0.50 or
valuation x.00013
3 Combination Pool&Spa
a)Valuation(per sq.ft.) $63
b)Permit Fee See Permit Fee Table
c)Permit Issuance Fee $35
d)Plan Check Fee 75% percent of permit fee
e)Electrical Permit Fee $71
f)Plumbing Permit Fee $123
g)SMIP Fee Greater of$0.50 or
valuation x.00013
4 Manufactured Pool
a)Valuation(per sq.ft.) $43
b)Permit Fee See Permit Fee Table
c)Permit Issuance Fee $35
d)Plan Check Fee n/a
e)Electrical Permit Fee $71
f)Plumbing Permit Fee $123
g)SMIP Fee Greater of$0.50 or
valuation x.00013
5 Portable Spa
a)Valuation(per sq.ft.) $63
b)Permit Fee See Permit Fee Table
c)Permit Issuance Fee $35
d)Plan Check Fee n/a
e)Electrical Permit Fee $71
f)Plumbing Permit Fee n/a
g)SMIP Fee Greater of$0.50 or
valuation x.00013
Resolution No. 2023-4196
Page 76
City of Moorpark
BUILDING &SAFETY FEES
Fee Description Fee Charge Basis „>t•
6 Commercial Pool,Spa,or Combination
a)Valuation(per sq.ft.) $80
b)Permit Fee See Permit Fee Table
c)Permit Issuance Fee $35
d)Plan Check Fee 75% percent of permit fee
e)Electrical Permit Fee $118
f)Plumbing Permit Fee $123
g)SMIP Fee Greater of$0.50 or
valuation x.00028
Resolution No. 2023-4196
Page 77
City of Moorpark
BUILDING &SAFETY FEES
Fee Description Fee Charge Basis Note
Miscellaneous Building&Safety Fees
1 Appeals Hearing $1,140 Per Appeal
2 Building Relocation Pre-Inspection $190
3 Business Registration Occupancy Inspection
a)Simple $63
b)Complex(e.g.,Changes of Use,or Industrial Uses) $190
4 Construction and Demolition Material Management Plan
a)Multi-Phase Project Combined Under One Submission $380 Per Phase
b)All Others $380
5 Mobile Home Set-up
a)Permanent $380
b)Temporary(Manufactured after June 15,1976) $190
6 Pre-Manufactured Building Set-up,Commercial $380
7 Occupancy Investigation/Investigation of Unpermitted Work $190 Per Hour
8 Records Update $48
9 Re-Inspection Fee $127 Each
10 Excess Plan Review(4th and Subsequent) $190 Per Hour
11 Fees for Services Not Listed in this Fee Schedule $190 Per Hour
Resolution No. 2023-4196
Page 78
City of Moorpark
DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES
Fee Description Fee Charge Basis Note
1 Park Facilities&Recreation'
Residential:Single Family Residence $4.71 per SF
Residential:Multi Family Residence $6.54 per SF
Non-Residential:Commercial NA per 1,000 SF
Non-Residential:Office NA per 1,000 SF
Non-Residential:Industrial NA per 1,000 SF
2 Library Facility Fees'
Residential:Single Family Residence $0.73 per SF
Residential:Multi Family Residence $1.02 per SF
Non-Residential:Commercial $188 per 1,000 SF
Non-Residential:Office $376 per 1,000 SF
Non-Residential:Industrial $75 per 1,000 SF
3 City Hall'
Residential:Single Family Residence $1.24 per SF
Residential:Multi Family Residence $1.72 per SF
Non-Residential:Commercial $319 per 1,000 SF
Non-Residential:Office $637 per 1,000 SF
Non-Residential:Industrial $127 per 1,000 SF
4 Police Facilities Fees'
Residential:Single Family Residence $0.57 per SF
Residential:Multi Family Residence $0.80 per SF
Non-Residential:Commercial $147 per 1,000 SF
Non-Residential:Office $295 per 1,000 SF
Non-Residential:Industrial $59 per 1,000 SF
5 Citywide Transportation Fee'
Residential:Single Family Residence $8.71 per SF
Residential:Multi Family Residence $9.30 per SF
Non-Residential:Commercial $20,111 per 1,000 SF
Non-Residential:Office $15,377 per 1,000 SF
Non-Residential:Industrial $4,664 per 1,000 SF
6 Fire Protection Facility Fees
Administration Fee $15.00
Residential:Single Family Residence $979.46 per unit
Residential:Multi Family Residence $721.87 per unit
Residential:Mobile Home $587.08 per unit
Non-Residential $0.49 per sq ft
7 Parking In-Lieu Fee in Downtown Specific Plan Area
Parking In-Lieu Fee Per Resolution
No.2007-2613
8 Tree and Landscape Fee
Residential,Commercial,and Industrial Development $0.05 per sq ft of pad space
1)An administrative fee of 5%is included in the fees for(1)legal,accounting,and other administrative support and(2)development impact fee program
administration costs including revenue collection,revenue and cost accounting,mandated public reporting,and fee Justification analysis.
Resolution No. 2023-4196
Page 79
City of Moorpark
PLANNING FEES
Fee Description Fixed Fee Deposit Charge Basis Note
Permits:Development
1 Administrative Exception $950 Fixed Fee
2 Administrative Permit:Residential $1,140 Fixed Fee
3 Administrative Permit:Commercial/Industrial
a)Base Fee $1,900 Fixed Fee
b)Plus Police Department Review $300 Fixed Fee
4 Administrative Permit:Relocation of a Business with an
Existing Administrative Permit(Not Involving Expansion of
More Than 50%of Floor Area,Change in the Nature of the
Business,or Sale of Alcoholic Beverages)
a)Base Fee $570 Fixed Fee
b)Plus Police Department Review $300 Fixed Fee
5 Administrative Permit:Relocation of Permitted Business That
Did Not Require an Administrative Permit When Established
(Not Involving Expansion of More Than 50%of Floor Area,
Change in the Nature of the Business,or Sale of Alcoholic
Beverages)
a)Base Fee $950 Fixed Fee
b)Plus Police Department Review $300 Fixed Fee
6 Appeal of Community Development Director Decision Not $1,140 Fixed Fee
Requiring Public Notice
7 Appeal of Community Development Director Decision $1,330 Fixed Fee
Requiring Public Notice
8 lot Line Adjustment,Certificate of Compliance,or Reversion
to Acreage
a)Base Fee $4,000 Deposit (a]
b)Per Lot $150 Deposit [a]
9 Permit Adjustment:Residential $570 Fixed Fee
10 Permit Adjustment:Commercial/Industrial $1,140 Fixed Fee
Permits:Zoning
11 Abandoned Shopping Cart Prevention Plan Review(Annual) $95 Fixed Fee
12 Adult Business Permits(Annual)
a)Adult Business Permit $950 Fixed Fee
b)Adult Business Performer Permit $190 Fixed Fee
13 Bingo Game Permit(Annual) $50 Fixed Fee (b]
14 Home Occupation Permit $110 Fixed Fee
15 Home Occupation Permit:Applicant Under 18,with Annual $0 Fixed Fee
Income<$10,000
16 Mobile Home Rent Increase Review $570 Fixed Fee (c]
Resolution No. 2023-4196
Page 80
City of Moorpark
PLANNING FEES
Fee Description Fixed Fee Deposit Charge Basis Note
17 Open House Directional Sign Permits
a)Annual Encroachment Permit for Individual Owner/Seller
or Real Estate Agent
i)Permit Application Received Prior to July 1 $190 Fixed Fee (d]
ii)Permit Application Received After July 1 $95 Fixed Fee [di
b)Annual Encroachment Permit for Real Estate Office
i)Permit Application Received Prior to July 1 $570 Fixed Fee [e]
ii)Permit Application Received After July 1 $285 Fixed Fee (el
c)Additional Sign Stickers $5 Fixed Fee
d)Retrieved Sign Storage Fee(per day) $5 Fixed Fee
18 Secondhand Dealer/Thrift Shop/Pawnbroker Permit
a)Permit Fee $760 Fixed Fee [fj
b)Deposit for Police Review Expenses $4,400 Deposit [fj
19 Sign Permits
a)New Signs $380 Fixed Fee
b)Sign Permit for Change of Copy on Existing Permitted Sign $190 Fixed Fee
c)Sign Program $1,140 Fixed Fee
20 Street Vendor Permit(Annual) $190 Fixed Fee
21 Temporary Sign/Banner Permit $95 Fixed Fee
22 Temporary Use Permits:
a)Minor(Outdoor Sales,RV as Dwelling During $285 Fixed Fee
Construction)
b)Major(Parades,Concerts,Carnivals,Shows)
i)Permit Application Review Fee $570 Fixed Fee
ii)Plus Police Department Review $300 Fixed Fee
iii)Additional Services Actual Cost Fixed Fee
23 Zoning Clearance $190 Fixed Fee
24 Zoning Verification Letter/Re-Build Letter $570 Fixed Fee
Planning-Development Services [Q]
Condition Compliance
25 Planning Condition Compliance Review 100%of original Deposit
Map/PD deposit
26 Landscape Review&Inspection 100%of City cost+ Deposit
15%admin fee
27 Lighting Plan Review&Inspection 100%of City cost+ Deposit
15%admin fee
28 Violation(Penalty)Conditions of Approval 100%of Staff Time for Deposit
Investigation&
Enforcement
Resolution No. 2023-4196
Page 81
City of Moorpark
PLANNING FEES
Fee Description Fixed Fee Deposit Charge Basis Note
Entitlement Applications
29 Appeal of Planning Commission Decision $3,800 Deposit
30 Conditional Use Permits(CUP)
a)CUP for Restaurant Use with or without Beer/Wine,or for
a Use Relocating from a Place within the City Where an
Existing CUP Has Been Granted and There Is No Change in
Use,only Location
i)Initial Deposit $4,560 Deposit
ii)Plus,Police Department Review $300 Fixed Fee
b)CUP-All Other
i)Initial Deposit $7,600 Deposit
ii)Plus,Police Department Review $300 Fixed Fee
31 Development Agreement $45,600 Deposit
32 General Plan Amendment $7,600 Deposit
a
33 Planned Development Permit
a)Commercial/Industrial—New Const.(<50,000 SF)
i)Initial Deposit $28,500 Deposit
ii)Plus,Police Department Review $300 Fixed Fee
b)Commercial/Industrial—New Const.(50,000 SF�)
i)Initial Deposit $38,000 Deposit
ii)Plus,Police Department Review $300 Fixed Fee
c)Commercial:Conversion of Residence to Retail or Office in
Downtown Specific Plan Area
i)Initial Deposit $7,600 Deposit
ii)Plus,Police Department Review $300 Fixed Fee
d)Residential(fewer than 30 units)
i)Initial Deposit $28,500 Deposit
ii)Plus,Police Department Review $300 Fixed Fee
e)Residential(30 units or more)
i)Initial Deposit $38,000 Deposit
ii)Plus,Police Department Review $300 Fixed Fee
34 Public Hearing Notice $2,280 Deposit
35 Specific Plan $57,000 Deposit
36 Tentative Parcel Map $10,450 Deposit
37 Tentative Tract Map
a)Fewer than 30 lots $13,300 Deposit
b)30 or more lots $28,500 Deposit
Resolution No. 2023-4196
Page 82
City of Moorpark
PLANNING FEES
Fee Description Fixed Fee Deposit Charge Basis Note
38 Variance $7,600 Deposit
39 Vesting Tentative Tract Map $38,000 Deposit
40 Zone Change $7,600 Deposit
41 Zoning Ordinance Amendment $7,600 Deposit
Environmental Documentation
42 Initial Study&Negative Declaration $7,600 Deposit
43 Environmental Analysis 100%of City cost+ Deposit (h)
15%admin fee
44 Environmental Impact Report Supplement/Addendum $9,500 Deposit
Special Studies and Reports
45 Special Studies,Reports,or Other Analysis 100%of City cost+ Deposit (h)
15%admin fee
Miscellaneous
46 Development Agreement-Annual Review $3,800 Deposit
47 Parcel Map Waiver,or Conditional Certificate of Compliance $9,500 Deposit
Modifications
48 Modification of Existing Planned Development Permit
a)Modification with No Substantial Change To Site Plan or Lesser of$10,000 or Deposit
Architectural Design 80%of initial deposit
amount
b)Modification-All Other 80%of Initial deposit Deposit
amount
Time Extension
49 Time Extension of Approval
a)Staff Decision $1,140 Deposit
IA Planning Commission or City Council Decision $3,040 Deposit
Pre-Applications and General Plan Amendment Pre-
50 Pre-Application(Non-GPA) $1,900 Deposit
51 General Plan Amendment Pre-Screening $11,020 Deposit
Technology Enhancement Fee
52 Technology Enhancement Fee 6%of Permit Fee Fixed Fee
Other
53 Fees for Services Not Listed in this Fee Schedule Bill Hourly Using Real
Time Billing Rates or
Actual Cost+15%
Admin Fee
Resolution No. 2023-4196
Page 83
City of Moorpark
PLANNING FEES
Fee Description Fixed Fee Deposit Charge Basis Note
[a]Initial deposit shall be calculated using base fee plus per lot fee.
[b]Fee amount established and limited by the State of California.
[c]Rent review fee referenced here applies to cost-of-living increases only.
[d]Includes five sign stickers.
[e]Includes sixty sign stickers.
[f]A deposit for police review expenses must be maintained and replenished on a monthly basis.Thrift shops owned and operated by 501(c)(3)non-profit
organizations are exempt from providing daily police reports and the corresponding police review deposit.
[g]City of Moorpark staff shall bill actual time spent on land use applications and other items eligible for cost recovery where a deposit is requled at a real time
cost accounting rate as established by the City Council.Additional deposits will be required when staff time charges are projected to exceed the deposit balance.
Any remaining deposit amount left from entitlement processing shall be applied to condition compliance.Upon Certificate of Occupancy or Final Building Permit,
when all permit review and processing has been completed,any remaining condition compliance deposits shall be returned after all costs are deducted for final
processing.
[h]Staff to provide estimated cost.
Resolution No. 2023-4196
Page 84
City of Moorpark
PUBLIC WORKS ENGINEERING AND ENCROACHMENT PERMIT FEES
Fee Description Fixed Fee Deposit Charge Basis Note
Encroachment Permits
1 Application Fee $150 Fixed
2 Permit/Inspection Fees
a)Curb,gutter,and/or sidewalk
i)Base Fee,up to 100 Linear Feet $150 Fixed
i)Each Additional linear foot $1 Fixed
b)Residential Driveway(each opening) $150 Fixed
c)Commercial Driveway(each opening) $300 Fixed
d)Use of City ROW for Temporary Access to Private $150 Fixed
Property
e)Misc.Construction and/or Use of City ROW
i)Base Fee $150 Fixed
ii)Annual Citywide Permit $450 Fixed
f)Placing and/or Relocation of Utility Poles
i)Annual Citywide Permit $450 Fixed
ii)Per Pole Fee $60 Fixed
3 Extension of Encroachment Permit $75 Fixed
Excavation Permits
4 Application Fee $150 Fixed
5 Permit/Inspection Fees
a)Percent of Construction Cost based on City Engineer's 5% Fixed
Bond Estimate Fee Spreadsheet
b)Annual Citywide Permit for Utility Trenches
i)Base Fee $1,000 Fixed
ii)Excavation permitted under Citywide Permit $60 Fixed [a]
6 Extension of Excavation Permit $75 Fixed
Special Studies and Reports
7 Special Studies,Reports,or Other Analysis(e.g.Geology, 100%of City cost+ Deposit
Hydrology,SWPPP,WQMP,etc.) 15%admin fee
Land Development Review
8 Land Development Review 100%of City cost+ Deposit
15%admin fee
Lot Line Adjustment
9 Lot Line Adjustment See Planning Fee Deposit
Schedule
Parking Permits
10 Replacement Guest Parking Permit $25 Fixed (cj
Resolution No. 2023-4196
Page 85
City of Moorpark
PUBLIC WORKS ENGINEERING AND ENCROACHMENT PERMIT FEES
Fee Description Fixed Fee Deposit Charge Basis Note
Small Wireless Facilities Within the City's Right-of-Way
11 Application Fee
a)First Small Cell Wireless Facility Site $3,030 Fixed
b)Additional Sites(Second through Fourth)on Same $2,758 Fixed
Application-Per Site
c)Additional Sites(Fifth and Beyond)on Same Application- $2,258 Fixed
Per Site
12 Application Fee for Co-Located Small Wireless Facility-Per $2,530 Fixed
Site
13 Application Fee for New Pole to Support Small Wireless $1,000 Fixed
Facilities
14 Annual Recurring Fee for Attachment to City-Owned Structure $270 Fixed
-Per Site
Stormwater/NPDES Annual Inspection and Re-Inspection
Fees
15 Automotive $85 Fixed
16 Food $85 Fixed
17 Industrial Facility:Tier 1(Non-Exposure) $85 Fixed [d]
18 Industrial Facility:Tier 2(General Permit) $142 Fixed
19 Laundry:Tier 1(General Public) $85 Fixed
20 Laundry:Tier 2(Commercial) $142 Fixed
21 Nursery:Tier 1(Less Than One Acre) $85 Fixed
22 Nursery:Tier 2(One or More Acres)
a)Up to 1 Acre $85 Fixed
b)Each Additional Acre or Portion Thereof $9 Fixed
23 Other Facilities $115 Fixed [e]
Subdivision Maps(Deposit) (f]
24 Tract or Parcel Map Processing Fee Deposit $600
25 Final Map,Parcel Map Check Fee Deposit
a)Fixed Quality Control fee for technical correctness for the
first three map checks and quality control only
i)Base Fee $2,750
ii)Per Lot $75
b)Additional Checks Above Three Actual Cost+15%
Admin Fee
Resolution No. 2023-4196
Page 86
City of Moorpark
PUBLIC WORKS ENGINEERING AND ENCROACHMENT PERMIT FEES
Fee Description Fixed Fee Deposit Charge Basis Note
Subdivision Plan Check,Inspection,and Engineering Reports [gj
26 Grading and Development Final Civil Improvements plan
check fees are based upon the bond estimate of
improvement costs according to the below schedule:
a)$0-999 Improvement Costs $600 Fixed
b)$1,000-9,999 Improvement Costs $600+15%of cost Fixed
over$1,000
c)$10,000-49,999 Improvement Costs $3,800+10%of cost Fixed
over$10,000
d)$50,000-99,999 Improvement Costs $11,400+5%of cost Fixed
over$50,000
e)$100,000-999,999 Improvement Costs $15,200+2%of cost Fixed
over$100,000
f)$1,000,000+Improvement Costs $41,800+1%of cost Fixed
over$1,000,000
27 Subdivision and Other Major Improvement Plan Changes $0 Fixed [hj
28 Revisions to Approved Tentative Subdivision Map(Deposit) $1,000 Deposit
29 Inspection Fee deposits are based upon the bond estimate of
improvement costs according to the below schedule:
a)$0-999 Improvement Costs $600 Deposit
b)$1,000-9,999 Improvement Costs $600+15%of cost Deposit
over$1,000
c)$10,000-49,999 Improvement Costs $3,800+10%of cost Deposit
over$10,000
d)$50,000-99,999 Improvement Costs $11,400+5%of cost Deposit
over$50,000
e)$100,000-999,999 Improvement Costs $15,200+2%of cost Deposit
over$100,000
f)$1,000,000+Improvement Costs $41,800+1%of cost Deposit
over$1,000,000
Resolution No. 2023-4196
Page 87
City of Moorpark
PUBLIC WORKS ENGINEERING AND ENCROACHMENT PERMIT FEES
Fee Description Fixed Fee Deposit Charge Basis Note
Transportation Permits
30 Permit Fee(per Vehicle Code) $16 Fixed
31 Annual Citywide Permit $90 Fixed
32 Extension of Transportation Permit $50 Fixed
33 Special Services Necessitated by Permit Actual Cost Fixed
Technology Enhancement Fee
34 Technology Enhancement Fee 6%of Permit Fee Fixed Fee
Emergency Call Outs
35 Emergency Call Outs Overtime Rate Billing fixed [i]
Rate;4 hour min.
Other
36 Fees for Services Not Listed in this Fee Schedule Bill Hourly Using Real Fixed
Time Billing Rates or
Actual Cost+15%
Admin Fee
[a]Not exceeding two feet in width and sixty feet in length,dug at right angles to the centerline of the road,or an excavation not exceeding thirty sq.ft.in
area.
[b] Special submittals,investigations,reports,or reviews will require deposits based on the actual or anticipated actual cost(including City overhead).The
above fees will cover one review and one follow-up review.Fees for additional reviews are to be paid on an actual time basis(including City overhead).
(c]An owner or resident residing at an affected property may purchase a maximum of two Replacement Guest Parking Permits per parking permit period,
unless approved otherwise by the City Manager or his/her designee.
Id]Non-exposure industrial facilities,after they have received their first inspection and filed for Non-exposure status,shall not be charged additional
inspection fees.Any industrial facility that fails to file for Non-exposure status shall continue to be inspected once every two years and continue to be charged
the Tier 1 rate.
(e] Other Facilities include US EPA Phase I and II Facilities;Municipal Landfills;Hazardous Waste Treatment,Disposal,and Recovery Facilities;and Emergency
and Community Right-of-Know Act(EPCRA).
If) If the actual cost(including City overhead)of map checking exceeds the total fee deposits,the developer shall pay the actual cost(including City overhead).
Actual cost shall include staff labor costs(plus City overhead),contract labor costs(plus City overhead),plus reimbursable expenses(i.e.,reproductions,etc.).
[g]Any substantial revisions(i.e.street alignments,pad sizes,pad elevation changes in excess of two feet)to approved tentative subdivision maps shall require
City Council approval.A fee of$1,000 per sheet,not including any required planning fees,shall be required for any such application of map revision,
[h]Fee is calculated as%of the estimate of costs of additional improvements,including work for which a grading permit must be obtained.
(i]Charges for emergency call outs shall be paid at the overtime rate,plus City overhead,for the positions responding for the time of the call out(Saturday,
Sunday,Holiday,etc.). The charge for any emergency call out shall be based upon a minimum time of four hours per employee used,regardless of the actual
length of time of the call out,for up to the first four hours used,and then at said applicable overtime rate,plus City overhead,for the actual number of hours
worked if beyond four hours. Emergency call outs for the purposes of this fee shall be defined as providing personnel and equipment called to work at times
when normal Public Works operations are secured.
The number of plan checks covered by the above described fees shall be limited to three.The third plan submittal shall be checked to confirm that said plan
submittal is correct and complete.Any additional plan checking efforts required shall be at a deposit of actual cost plus City overhead.
If the actual cost(including City overhead)of plan checking exceeds the total fee deposits,the developer shall pay the actual cost(including City overhead).
Actual cost shall include staff labor costs(plus City overhead),contract labor costs(plus City overhead),plus reimbursable expenses(i.e.,reproductions,etc.).
Resolution No. 2023-4196
Page 88
City of Moorpark
COMMERCIAL FILMING AND PHOTOGRAPHY PERMIT FEES
Fee Description Fee Charge Basis Note
1 Commercial Film and Photography Permit
a)Filming on Private Property Only
i)Base Permit Fee $345 per application (iJ
ii)Per Location Fee $144 per location (a]
iii) Per Day Fee $115 per day (a)
b)Public Right-of-Way/City Property
i)Base Permit Fee $460 per application (a)
ii)Per Location Fee $201 per location [a]
iii)Per Day Fee $345 per day (a)
c)Still Photography Only $115 per application
d)Parking Lot Rental
i)Rental Rate $275 per day
ii)Refundable Clean-up Deposit(discretionary) $1,000 per rental
e)Police Department Review $300 per application
f)Special Services Actual Cost to City
[a)If a film permit is issued for both private property and City property/right-of-way locations,the City property/right-of-way locations base permit fee
shall be used. Per location fees and per day fees shall be calculated based on the number of private property and public property right-of-way locations
used and days used.
Resolution No. 2023-4196
Page 89
City of Moorpark
FACILITY RENTAL FEES
Rental Group Classifications
Purpose
The purpose and intent of the City Council in adopting the Rental Group Classifications shall be to provide direction for staff and the public
relating to the classification of groups and individuals renting City Facilities.
Group Classification Definitions
GROUP 1: Governmental agencies directly serving City residents when the Rental use is of direct benefit to City residents,and Moorpark
nonprofit organizations with current tax exempt status under Section 501(c)(3),501(c)(4),501(c)(6),501(c)(19)of the U.S.Revenue Code
chartered within the limits of the City of Moorpark or with an official branch or chapter located within the City of Moorpark,Rentals by
Moorpark nonprofit organizations must meet all of the following criteria in order to be categorized under Group 1:
- The Rental is intended for,and open to,the general public.
- No admission or entry fee is charged to attend the Rental.
- The Rental spans no more than three(3)consecutive days,and is held no more than once per year.
- Rental attendance is less than 2,000 people.
GROUP 2: City residents and businesses for noncommercial purposes(no entrance fees or sales),certain nonprofit organizations based in the
City of Moorpark,and governmental agencies serving the residents of the City of Moorpark,when the rental does not comply with the
requirements of Group 1.
- The designation of City of Moorpark resident applies to individuals who live within the incorporated Moorpark City boundary. Proof of
residency is required.The designation of a Moorpark business applies to businesses with a physical address(no post office boxes)within the
incorporated City of Moorpark boundary and with a current Moorpark Business Registration.
- The designation of a Moorpark nonprofit organization applies to those with current tax exempt status under Section 501(c)(3),501(c)(4),
501(c)(6),501(c)(19)of the U.S.Revenue Code chartered within the limits of the City of Moorpark,or with an official branch or chapter
located within the City of Moorpark.Proof of 501(C)status is required.
- The designation of governmental agency directly serving the residents of Moorpark applies,but is not limited,to the following agencies:
Moorpark Unified School District,Moorpark College,Ventura County Water Works District I,County of Ventura,Ventura County
Superintendent of Schools,and agencies of similar status as determined at the Director's sole discretion.
- For park field rentals,a minimum of 51%of those attending the rental must be City of Moorpark residents in order for the Renter to be
classified under Group 2.
GROUP 3: Residents of the Moorpark Unified School District boundaries that reside outside of the City's Incorporated limits,Moorpark
businesses for commercial purposes,and non-Moorpark nonprofit organizations.
- The designation of residents of the Moorpark Unified School District boundary applies to individuals living within the District boundaries
but outside of the City's incorporated limits.Proof of address is required.
- The designation of non-Moorpark nonprofit organizations applies to nonprofit organizations with current tax exempt status under Section
501(c)(3),501(c)(4),501(c)(6),501(c)(19) of the U.S.Revenue Code,chartered outside of the City of Moorpark and with no official
chapters or branches located within the City of Moorpark.
- The designation of a Moorpark business applies to businesses with an established address within the incorporated City boundary and with
a current Moorpark Business Registration.
GROUP 4: All other Renters not included in Groups 1,2,or 3.
Resolution No. 2023-4196
Page 90
City of Moorpark
FACILITY RENTAL FEES
Payment Schedule
Payment Schedule
For Reservation Applications submitted more than thirty(30)calendar days in advance of the first rental date requested,and with rental fees
exceeding$500.00,the Renter may submit partial payment of not less than$200.00,which will be applied toward the rental fees.Payment of
all rental fees is due in full thirty(30)calendar days prior to the first rental date on the Rental Permit.
For Reservation Applications submitted thirty(30)calendar days or less before the first rental date requested,full payment must be made at
the time the Reservation Application is submitted.
For all rentals with rental fees totaling$500.00 or less,full payment must be made at the time the Reservation Application Is submitted.
Fees for Reservation Applications submitted less than ten(10)business days in advance must be paid by credit card(Visa or MasterCard only),
cashier's check,money order,or cash.Personal checks will be accepted only when the Reservation Application Is submitted ten(10)or more
business days in advance.
Reservation dates on a Rental Permit may not span a time period of more than ninety(90)calendar days,except those Rental Permits issued
to youth sports organizations for use under an agreement with the City.
Security deposits must be paid in full at the time the Reservation Application is submitted.
Resolution No. 2023-4196
Page 91
City of Moorpark
FACILITY RENTAL FEES
Facility Rental Description Group 1 Group 2 Group 3 Group 4
As used in this resolution,"Direct Costs"shall be defined as measurable or quantifiable costs to the City resulting directly from the rental use,
including but not limited to staff time,police costs,traffic control,etc.
Hourly Park Rental Fees
1 Ballfield(softball or baseball) Direct Costs $22 $27 $32
2 Athletic Field(soccer or football) Direct Costs $22 $27 $32
3 Open Grass Area Direct Costs $10 $15 $20
4 Field lights $28-$35 $35 $40 $45
5 Electricity(other than field lights) Direct Costs $5 $8 $12
6 Basketball Court(outdoor) Direct Costs $8 $12 $20
7 Tennis Court Direct Costs Direct Costs $8 $12 $15
8 Pickle Ball Court(each) Direct Costs $4 $8 $12
9 Multi-purpose court(AVCP*) Direct Costs $17 $22 $27
10 Horseshoe pit Direct Costs Direct Costs $8 $12 $20
11 Bocce ball court Direct Costs Direct Costs $8 $12 $20
12 Picnic table Direct Costs Direct Costs $5 $8 $12
13 Gazebo(Poindexter Park) Direct Costs $8 $12 $20
14 Small Pavilion(Campus,Campus,Canyon,Glenwood, Direct Costs $20 $25 $40
Mountain,Meadows,Tierra Rejada.Maximum 75 people.)
15 Medium Pavilion(College View,Mammoth Highlands,Miller, Direct Costs $25 $35 $50
Peach,Hill.Maximum 100 people.)
16 Large Pavilion(AVCP west,Poindexter.Maximum 175 Direct Costs $40 $50 $75
people.)
17 Peppertree Pavilion(AVCP) Direct Costs $85 $105 $165
18 AVCP Recreational Trail Direct Costs $25 N/A N/A
19 Parking Lot(per space) Direct Costs $3 $5 $7
20 Parking Lot Small(<20 spaces) Direct Costs $20 $25 $30
21 Parking Lot Med(20-75 spaces) Direct Costs $30 $35 $45
22 Parking Lot Large(76+spaces) Direct Costs $40 $50 $60
23 Skatepark(lessons,classes,camps) Direct Costs $25 $35 $50
24 Skatepark(events,exclusive use) Direct Costs $100 $150 $200
25 Snack Bar(AVCP) Direct Costs $15 $25 $250
26 Batting Cages(Poindexter Park) Direct Costs $8 $12 $20
*AVCP=Arroyo Vista Community Park
Resolution No. 2023-4196
Page 92
City of Moorpark
FACILITY RENTAL FEES
Facility Rental Description Group 1 Group 2 Group 3 Group 4
Hourly Indoor Facility Use Fees
Arroyo Vista Recreation Center(AVRC)
27 Sycamore Room Direct Costs $65 $75 $85
28 Jacaranda and Cypress Room Direct Costs $50 $60 $70
29 Magnolia Conference Room Direct Costs $20 $30 $40
30 Kitchen Use Fee* Direct Costs $22 $32 $42
31 Gymnasium Use Fee Direct Costs $60 $70 $80
Community Center
32 Apricot Room Direct Costs $65 $75 $85
33 Citrus Room Direct Costs $45 $55 $65
34 Kitchen Use Fee* Direct Costs $22 $32 $42
*AVRC and Community Center Kitchen Use Fee is calculated
hourly in conjunction with a room rental.(Kitchen may not be
rented by itself.)
Equipment Use Fees
35 Table(each) $5 $5 $5 $5
36 Chair(each) $0.25 $0.25 $0.25 $0.25
37 Stage(per section) $25 $25 $25 $25
Flat Rate Fees
Permit Application Fees(Nonrefundable)
38 Single Date/Single Facility $0 $15 $15 $15
39 Single Date/Multiple Facilities or Multiple Dates/Single $0 $25 $25 $25
Facility
40 Multiple Dates/Multiple Facilities$0$40$40$40 $0 $40 $40 $40
41 Sports Tournaments 500-1,999 total attendance $0 $50 $75 $100
42 Sports Tournaments 2,000+total attendance $0 $75 $100 $125
43 Events 500-1,999 total attendance $0 $50 $75* $100"
44 Large Events 2,000+total attendance $0 $75 $100* $125*
45 Youth Sports Organization Seasonal Permit(fee is per field) n/a $10 n/a n/a
*Rental also requires payment of 10%of event gross
receipts
Resolution No. 2023-4196
Page 93
City of Moorpark
FACILITY RENTAL FEES
Facility Rental Description Group 1 Group 2 Group 3 Group 4
Other Flat Rate Fees
46 Refund Processing Fee(to process a Rental $0 $15 $15 $15
cancellation/refund)
47 Attraction/Performer Permit Fee(Pre-approved company) $0 $10 $10 $10
48 Attraction/Performer Permit Fee*(All others) $30 $50 $75 5100
49 Late Fee(for applications submitted less than 3 business $0 $20 $20 $20
days in advance)
50 Change Fee(for renter requested changes to approved $0 $5 $5 $5
permits.Fee is per facility and date,not to exceed Permit
Application Fee.Changes must be made(5)business days
prior to rental date.)
51 Field Preparation Fee $40 $50 $60 $75
52 Soccer Goal Rental* $25 $35 545 $60
53 Softball/Baseball Base Rental* $10 $15 $20 $25
54 VendorFee(pervendor) $0 $25 $50 $75
55 Alcohol Permit Fee $0 $50 $75 $100
56 Parking Lot Small(<20 spaces)** $0 $140 5175 $225
57 Parking Lot Med(20-75 spaces)** $0 $200 $250 $325
58 Parking Lot Large(76+spaces)** $0 $275 $350 $450
59 Parking Lot w/Film Permit*** N/A $250 $250 $250
*Security deposit also required
**Rate is per day
***Rate applies to unimproved parking lots and improved parking lots not associated with a public park or building.Improved parking lots associated
with public parks and buildings will be charged at the daily rate stated above for the parking lot size,or$250,whichever Is higher,
Resolution No. 2023-4196
Page 94
City of Moorpark
FACILITY RENTAL FEES
Refundable Security Deposits
Security deposit amount(s)shall be collected to ensure return of rented equipment and protection of City property. All or a portion of the
deposit may be retained for the reasons specified in the City Council's Resolution Adopting Rules and Regulations Governing City Park Rentals.
Facility Rental Description All Groups
Security Deposits
60 Soccer Goals $100
61 Softball/Baseball Bases $100
62 Attractions,Performers,Equipment(except City preauthorized) $100
63 Stage(Indoor use only) $100
64 Snack Bar $500
65 Park Rentals 51+attendance $100
66 Park Rentals 200+attendance,Indoor Rentals $300
67 Park Rentals 500+attendance,Rentals w/alcohol,AVRC Gym $500
68 Park Rentals 2,000+attendance $1,000
69 Attraction Company Deposit $500
Resolution No. 2023-4196
Page 95
City of Moorpark
FACILITY RENTAL FEES
Cancellation Fees and Additional Charges All Groups
70 Cancellation Fee 50%of Rental Fees
71 Staff Fees for Setup,Breakdown,and Cleanup Based upon Staff Billing Rates
72 Police Service Fees City Contract Rate+15%Overhead Cost
73 Contract Security Guards City Contract Rate+15%Overhead Cost
74 Insurance Fees City Contract Rate
75 Other Charges As Determined by Parks and Recreation Director
Cancellation Fees
Rental fee refunds for cancellations by the Renter are subject to the provisions established in the City Council's Resolution Adopting Rules and
Regulations Governing City Facility Rentals,which includes description of deductions for the Processing Fee and Cancellation Fee.The amount
of the Processing Fee is included under Flat Rate Fees.
Additional Charges
Additional Charges Over the Basic Rate are as Follows:
A.Staff Fees: Staff fees will be charged when staff is required for additional set up,breakdown,or cleanup beyond normal time requirements,
for tournaments,for indoor Rentals with 100 or more total attendance and park Rentals with 200 or more total attendance,for Rentals with
alcoholic beverages,or for special circumstances as described in the City Council's Resolution Adopting Rules and Regulations Governing City
Facility Rentals.Staff fees shall be charged in accordance with the current billing rate established by the City Council,as follows:
- Part-time staff:Hourly rate equivalent to the current billing rate for the Park and Facility Attendant III position.
- Full-time staff:Hourly rate equivalent to the current billing rate for the applicable position.
B.Police Services Fees: Fees for Police service may be charged for any rental requiring Police services,as determined necessary by the
Director. For all Groups,the Police service fee shall be consistent with the City Council's Resolution Establishing Police Service Fees(hourly rate
plus a fifteen percent City general government overhead cost).
C.Contract Security Guards: Fees for private Security Guards may be charged for any rental requiring Security Guards,as determined
necessary by the Director. The fee for Security Guards shall be the City's current hourly contract rate+15%.
D.Insurance Fees: For Rentals which require insurance in accordance with the City Council's Resolution Adopting Rules and Regulations
Governing City Facility Rentals,insurance fees shall be charged to the Renter In accordance with current rates as established by the City's
insurance provider.Insurance fees may be waived if insurance documentation is provided,including certificate of liability insurance and
endorsement naming the City of Moorpark as additional Insured,in accordance with the City Council's Resolution Adopting Rules and
Regulations Governing City Facility Rentals.
E.Large Event and Large Venue Waste Management: Consistent with Article V of Chapter 8.36,Solid Waste,of the City's Municipal Code,all
large events and large venues,as defined in Chapter 8.36,are subject to the requirements of that Chapter,including the requirement for a
waste management plan and a waste management fee as established by resolution of the City Council.
F.Other Charges: The City reserves the right to make adjustments or impose additional fees on a case-by-case basis as a determination of the
approval of a Rental Permit pursuant to Moorpark Municipal Code Section 12.16.140 and the current City Council Resolution Adopting Rules
and Regulations Governing City Facility Rentals.Additional charges may be levied for rental requests containing unusual activities or
accommodations as determined by the Director.
Resolution No. 2023-4196
Page 96
City of Moorpark
ELECTRICAL USE FEES-VEHICLE CHARGING AND COURT LIGHTING RATES
Fee Description Fee Charge Basis Note
Electric Vehicle Supply Equipment(EVSE)Fees
1 Blink EVSE-Rates for use of the Blink EVSE are predetermined by
ECOtality North America,Currently:
a)Blink Plus $1.00 per hour
b)Blink Basic $1.50 per hour
c)Blink Guest $2.00 per hour
2 ChargePoint EVSE or Other EVSE-Rates are equivalent to the lowest
subscription level offered by ECOtality North America,Currently:
a)City Vehicles $0.00 per hour
b)All Other Vehicles $1.00 per hour
Lighting Fees
3 Basketball Court Light Fee $0.50 per quarter hour
4 Tennis Court Light Fee $0.50 per quarter hour
Resolution No. 2023-4196
Page 97
City of Moorpark
LIBRARY SERVICES FEES
Fee Description Fee Charge Basis Note
Library Fees
1 Replacement Library Card $1 each
2 Non California Resident Library Card $25 annually
3 Copies(Black and White,8Y:"x 11") $0.10 per page
4 Copies(Color,834"x 11") $0.25 per page
5 Prints(Black and White,8Y:"x 11") $0.15 per page
6 Prints(Color,8Y:"x 11") $0.50 per page
7 3D Printer Use(based on weight of printed price)
a)Processing Fee $1
b)Cost per Gram $0.05
8 USB Flash Drive 1GB $5 each
9 Processing Fee for Lost/Damaged Material $10 per item
10 Replacement Audio Book(Book on CD)Cases $10 each
11 Replacement Jewel Case or DVD Case $1 each
12 Missing Barcode $1 each
13 Inter-Library Loan Fee varies based on lending library fee
14 Lost Item varies borrower to pay full cost of Item
15 Returned Check $25 per occurrence
16 Delinquent Account Referred to Collection Agency $10 per occurrence
17 Library Late Fees No Charge
Resolution No. 2023-4196
Page 98
City of Moorpark
POLICE SERVICES FEES
Fee Description Fee Charge Basis Note
Standard Police Service Fees (a]
1 Captain Annual Cost/1,800
per hour*+ 15%
2 Sergeant Annual Cost/1,800
per hour*+ 15%
3 Senior Deputy Annual Cost/1,800 [b]
per hour* +15%
4 Deputy Annual Cost/1,800 [b]
per hour*+15%
5 Cadet Annual Cost/900
per hour*+15%
Overtime Police Service Fees [a]
6 Sergeant Annual Overtime Rate
per hour*+15%
7 Senior Deputy Annual Overtime Rate [b]
per hour*+ 15%
8 Deputy Annual Overtime Rate [b]
per hour*+15%
9 Cadet Annual Overtime Rate
per hour*+15%
Administrative Police Fees for Towing
10 A fee of$200.00 will be assessed for each person who owns $200
a vehicle which is towed for impound or storage purposes,
pursuant to this resolution.
11 A penalty fee in the amount of ten percent(10%)may be 10%
added each month to any fee imposed in the event the fee
is not paid within thirty(30)days after the billing date.
False Alarm Billing Rates
12 False Alarm Responses Within a Period of Twelve(12)
Consecutive Months Starting Each January 1 and Ending
Each December 31
a)First Response $0
b)Second Response $0
c)Third Response $0
d)Fourth Response $200
e)Fifth Response $300
f)Sixth Response $400
g)Seventh Response $500
h)Eighth Response $600
i)Ninth and Greater Response $700
Note:A penalty fee in the amount of ten percent(10%)may be added each month to any fee imposed in the event the fee is not
paid within thirty(30)days after the billing date.
Note:A penalty fee in the amount of ten percent(10%)may be added each month to any fee imposed in the event the fee Is not paid within thirty
(30)days after the billing date.
*As calculated from the latest annual contract and services rates adopted by the Ventura County Board of Supervisors for the Ventura County
Sheriff's Office.
la]These rates include fifteen percent(15%)City general government overhead.
[b]Beat Coordinator hours are billed at either the Senior Deputy or Deputy Rate as applicable.
1
Resolution No. 2023-4196
Page 99
City of Moorpark
PARKING CITATIONS
Fee Description Fine Charge Basis Note
1 MMC 10.04.150:Parallel Parking over 18"from the Curb $63 per citation
2 MMC 10.04.160:Angle Parking Only Zone $63 per citation
3 MMC 10.04.170:Time Limit Parking Zones $63 per citation
4 MMC 10.04.180:Block,Park,or Stop in a"Disabled Person"Space $355 per citation
5 MMC 10.04.190(a):Prohibited Parking within an intersection $63 per citation
6 MMC 10.04.190(b):Prohibited Parking on a Crosswalk(Except for a Bus) $63 per citation
7 MMC 10.04.190(c):Prohibited Parking within a Safety Zone $63 per citation
8 MMC 10.04.190(d):Prohibited Parking within 15'from a Fire Station $63 per citation
Entrance/Exit
9 MMC 10.04.190(e):Prohibited Parking:Unattended Vehicle within 15'of $63 per citation
Fire Hydrant
10 MMC 10.04.190(f):Prohibited Parking in Front of a Private or Public $63 per citation
Driveway
11 MMC 10.04.190(g):Prohibited Parking on a Sidewalk $63 per citation
12 MMC 10.04.190(h):Prohibited Parking Obstructing a Construction Zone $63 per citation
13 MMC 10.04.190(i):Prohibited Parking:Double Parking $63 per citation
14 MMC 10.04,190(j):Prohibited Parking:No Parking Zone,Red Curb,or Signs $63 per citation
Prohibiting
15 MMC 10.04.190(k):Prohibited Parking:Traffic Hazard $63 per citation
16 MMC 10.04.190(1):Prohibited Parking across Parallel Parking Stall Lines $63 per citation
17 MMC 10.04.190(m):Prohibited Parking beyond Parking Stall Causing $63 per citation
Hazard
18 MMC 10.04.190(n):Prohibited Parking in a Bus Loading Zone $63 per citation
19 MMC 10.04.190(o):Prohibited Parking on a Bridge $63 per citation
20 MMC 10.04.190(p):Prohibited Parking:Block Sidewalk Curb Cutout for a $63 per citation
Wheelchair Access
21 MMC 10.04.200:Prohibited or Restricted Parking $63 per citation
22 MMC 10.04.205:Oversized Vehicle in Prohibited Location $63 per citation
23 MMC 10.04.210:Parking on a Hill over 3%Grade without Turning Wheels $63 per citation
24 MMC 10.04.220:72 Hour Parking Limit $63 per citation
25 MMC 10.04.225:Overnight Parking in a Commercial Zone $63 per citation
26 MMC 10.04.227:Living in a Vehicle $63 per citation
27 MMC 10.04.240(a):Commercial Vending near Schools $63 per citation
Resolution No. 2023-4196
Page 100
City of Moorpark
PARKING CITATIONS
Fee Description Fine Charge Basis Note
28 MMC 10.04.240(c):Commercial Vending with Noise-Making Device near $63 per citation
School
29 MMC 10.04.250:Parking or Stopping in a Loading Zone $63 per citation
30 MMC 10.04.260: Parking or Stopping in a Passenger Loading Zone $63 per citation
31 MMC 10.04.300:Commercial Vehicle Parking in Residential Area $63 per citation
32 Late Penalty Fee(after 14 days of mailing of parking violation) $10 per citation
33 Convenience Fee for Online/Telephone Payments $4 per citation
34 Administrative Fee in lieu of collecting a fine for a citation for failure to $25 per citation
display a disabled placard,where the individual who received the citation
can show proof that he/she had been issued a valid placard at the time the
citation was received
35 California DMV Administrative Service Fee for recording the Notice of $4 per citation
Delinquent Parking/Toll Violation on vehicle registration
36 Indigent Payment Plan Fee $5 per citation
..
Resolution No. 2023-4196
Page 101
City of Moorpark
REAL TIME BILLING RATES - FULL TIME POSITIONS
Position Regular Rate Overtime Rate Charge Basis Note
1 City Manager $285 Per Hour
2 Assistant City Manager $260 Per Hour
3 Deputy City Manager $245 Per Hour
4 Administrative Services Director $235 Per Hour
5 City Engineer/Public Works Director $235 Per Hour
6 Community Development Director $235 Per Hour
7 Finance Director $235 Per Hour
8 Parks and Recreation Director $235 Per Hour
9 Public Works Director $235 Per Hour
10 Assistant to the City Manager/City Clerk $215 Per Hour
11 City Engineer $215 Per Hour
12 Planning Director $215 Per Hour
13 Assistant City Engineer $195 Per Hour
14 Deputy Community Development Director $195 Per Hour
15 Deputy Finance Director $195 Per Hour
16 Assistant to the City Manager $175 Per Hour
17 Budget and Finance Manager $175 Per Hour
18 City Clerk $175 Per Hour
19 Community Services Manager $175 Per Hour
20 Economic Development and Planning Manager $175 Per Hour
21 Information Systems Manager $175 Per Hour
22 Parks and Landscape Manager $175 Per Hour
23 Planning Manager $175 Per Hour
24 Public Works Manager $175 Per Hour
25 Senior Civil Engineer $175 Per Hour
26 Administrative Services Manager $160 Per Hour
27 Economic Development and Housing Manager $160 Per Hour
28 Economic Development Manager $160 Per Hour
29 Finance/Accounting Manager $160 Per Hour
30 Human Resources Manager $160 Per Hour
31 Program Manager $160 Per Hour
32 Recreation Services Manager $160 Per Hour
33 Accountant II $145 Per Hour
34 Associate Civil Engineer $145 Per Hour
35 Landscape/Parks Maintenance Superintendent $145 Per Hour
36 Principal Planner $145 Per Hour
39
Resolution No. 2023-4196
Page 102
City of Moorpark
REAL TIME BILLING RATES- FULL TIME POSITIONS
Position Regular Rate Overtime Rate Charge Basis Note
37 Public Works Superintendent/Inspector $145 Per Hour
38 Senior Housing Analyst $145 Per Hour
39 Senior Human Resources Analyst $145 Per Hour
40 Senior Information Systems Administrator $145 Per Hour
41 Senior Management Analyst $145 Per Hour
42 Accountant I $130 Per Hour
43 Active Adult Center Supervisor $130 Per Hour
44 Assistant City Clerk $130 Per Hour
45 Assistant Engineer $130 Per Hour
46 Human Resources Analyst $130 Per Hour
47 Information Systems Administrator $130 Per Hour
48 Management Analyst $130 Per Hour
49 Parks and Facilities Supervisor $130 Per Hour
50 Public Works Supervisor $130 Per Hour
51 Purchasing Analyst $130 Per Hour
52 Recreation Supervisor $130 Per Hour
53 Associate Planner II $120 $180 Per Hour
54 Human Resources Specialist $120 $180 Per Hour
55 Recreation Specialist $120 $180 Per Hour
56 Senior Account Technician II $120 $180 Per Hour
57 Vector/Animal Control Specialist $120 $180 Per Hour
58 Associate Planner I $110 $165 Per Hour
59 Active Adult Center Coordinator $105 $160 Per Hour
60 Administrative Specialist $105 $160 Per Hour
61 Deputy City Clerk II $105 $160 Per Hour
62 Executive Secretary $105 $160 Per Hour
63 Human Resources Assistant $105 $160 Per Hour
64 Recreation Coordinator III $105 $160 Per Hour
65 Senior Account Technician I $105 $160 Per Hour
66 Account Technician II $100 $150 Per Hour
67 Assistant Planner $100 $150 Per Hour
68 Code Compliance Technician II $100 $150 Per Hour
69 Information Systems Technician II $100 $150 Per Hour
70 Vector/Animal Control Technician II $100 $150 Per Hour
71 Facilities Technician $95 $145 Per Hour
72 Landscape Maintenance Inspector $95 $145 Per Hour
40
I
Resolution No. 2023-4196
Page 103
City of Moorpark
REAL TIME BILLING RATES- FULL TIME POSITIONS
Position Regular Rate Overtime Rate Charge Basis Note
73 Administrative Assistant II $90 $135 Per Hour
74 Community Services Technician $90 $135 Per Hour
75 Deputy City Clerk I $90 $135 Per Hour
76 Landscape Maintenance Specialist $90 $135 Per Hour
77 Recreation Coordinator II $90 $135 Per Hour
78 Senior Maintenance Worker $90 $135 Per Hour
79 Vector/Animal Control Technician I $90 $135 Per Hour
80 Account Technician I $85 $130 Per Hour
81 Information Systems Technician I $85 $130 Per Hour
82 Administrative Assistant I $85 $130 Per Hour
83 Code Compliance Technician I $85 $130 Per Hour
84 Irrigation Specialist $85 $130 Per Hour
85 Planning Technician $85 $130 Per Hour
86 Maintenance Worker Ill $80 $120 Per Hour
87 Crossing Guard Supervisor $75 $115 Per Hour
88 Office Assistant Ill $75 $115 Per Hour
89 Public Works Technician $75 $115 Per Hour
90 Recreation Coordinator I $75 $115 Per Hour
91 Maintenance Worker II $75 $115 Per Hour
92 Recreation Program Specialist $75 $115 Per Hour
93 Teen Coordinator $75 $115 Per Hour
94 Account Clerk II $70 $105 Per Hour
95 Recreation Leader IV $70 $105 Per Hour
96 Recreation Assistant II $70 $105 Per Hour
97 Account Clerk I $65 $100 Per Hour
98 Office Assistant II $65 $100 Per Hour
99 Recreation Assistant I $60 $90 Per Hour
100 Maintenance Worker I $60 $90 Per Hour
101 Office Assistant I $60 $90 Per Hour
41
Resolution No. 2023-4196
Page 104
City of Moorpark
REAL TIME BILLING RATES- PART TIME POSITIONS
Position Regular Rate Overtime Rate Charge Basis Note
1 Project Administrator IV $185 $280 Per Hour
2 Project Administrator III $150 $225 Per Hour
3 Project Administrator II $110 $165 Per Hour
4 Project Administrator I $70 $105 Per Hour
5 Preschool Director $40 $60 Per Hour
6 Preschool Teacher $40 $60 Per Hour
7 Camp Director $35 $55 Per Hour
8 Senior Nutrition Coordinator $35 $55 Per Hour
9 Solid Waste&Recycling Assistant $35 $55 Per Hour
10 Assistant Camp Director $35 $55 Per Hour
11 Parks&Facilities Attendant III $35 $55 Per Hour
12 Intern $35 $55 Per Hour
13 Records Clerk $30 $45 Per Hour
14 Recreation Leader II $30 $45 Per Hour
15 Parks&Facilities Attendant II $30 $45 Per Hour
16 Camp Counselor II $30 $45 Per Hour
17 Clerical Aide/Crossing Guard $30 $45 Per Hour
18 Preschool Aide $30 $45 Per Hour
19 Crossing Guard $30 $45 Per Hour
20 Clerical Aide II $30 $45 Per Hour
21 Recreation Leader I $30 $45 Per Hour
22 Parks&Facilities Attendant I $30 $45 Per Hour
23 Camp Counselor I $30 $45 Per Hour
24 Clerical Aide I $30 $45 Per Hour
42
Resolution No. 2023-4196
Page 105
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF VENTURA ) ss.
CITY OF MOORPARK
I, Ky Spangler, City Clerk of the City of Moorpark, California, do hereby certify
under penalty of perjury that the foregoing Resolution No. 2023-4196 was adopted by
the City Council of the City of Moorpark at a regular meeting held on the 19th day of
July, 2023, and that the same was adopted by the following vote:
AYES: Councilmembers Castro, Delgado, Groff, Means and Mayor Enegren
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None
WITNESS my hand and the official seal of said City this 25th day of July, 2023.
Ky Sp le , Ci lerk
(seal)
e�C
0.2. 11 �i♦O'9'� i
o
2� m
9,A
• 4TIED .vti