HomeMy WebLinkAboutAGENDA REPORT 2023 0719 CCSA REG ITEM 08A POWERPOINT1
DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE UPDATE
CITY OF MOORPARK
May 25, 2023
2
AGENDA
•Development Impact Fees Overview
•Rules and Limitations
•History
•Methodology, Calculations and Fees
•Fee Comparisons
•Question and Answers
3
PROJECT TEAM
Megan Quinn
Director/Project Manager
Municipal + District Finance
Connie Fife
Senior Analyst
Municipal + District Finance
4
A one-time fee intended to ensure new development pays a
fair share to mitigate their Impacts
•Who pays the fees? Developers pay, typically at the time
of building permit issuance.
•What are the Fees typically used for?
o General Government Facilities
o Police Facilities
o Fire Facilities
o Park Facilities
o Water Facilities
o Sewer Facilities
o Storm Drainage Facilities
o Transportation Facilities
WHAT IS A DEVELOPMENT
IMPACT FEE
5
•Why are impact fees important:
New development pays for their fair share of new infrastructure without
burdening existing development.
Development impact fees equitably distribute the costs related to new
infrastructure to all potential new developments.
Balances fee levels with desired economic growth.
•Why are fees updated/adjusted?
Without an update to old fees and annual adjustments to adopted
development impact fees, there would not be adequate funding to
support infrastructure for future growth as estimated by the City’s General
Plan.
Updated analyses and methodology to comply with the legal requirements
of the Mitigation Fee Act (AB1600) and AB602
DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES
CONTINUED
6
RULES AND LIMITATIONS
•Fees can only fund capital costs
o Fee cannot fund ongoing maintenance or salaries
•Fees cannot fund existing deficiencies
•Only includes cost attributable to new development
o Fees can only fund new development’s fair share based on a
rational nexus test
•Funds must be used for the projects in which they were intended
o If not spent, funds must be returned to the property owner
Must meet Annual and Five-Year Reporting requirements per AB 1600
7
ASSEMBLY BILL (AB) 602
8
•Identify Impact Fees per the Mitigation Fee
Act
•Cannot fund maintenance
•Cannot fund salary positions
•Tied to impacts caused by new
developments
•Fee Update Activities
o Met with City Hall Staff to confirm
future growth projections and facility
inventory and valuation
o Updated costs and reviewed
methodology and assumptions
HISTORY OF
MOORPARK FEES
Current Fees Notes
Traffic System Management Combined for new Citywide Transportation fee.
Citywide Traffic Mitigation Fee Combined for new Citywide Transportation fee .
Crossing Guard Fund No change –not an AB1600 fee .
Library Facilities Included in Nexus Study.
Open Space Maintenance No change.Not included as it is for maintenance.
Tree and Landscape Maintenance No change.Not included as it is for maintenance.
Art in Public Places No change –not an AB1600 fee .
Park Improvement No update to Quimby Fee. Updating Park and
Recreation Fee.
Los Angeles A.O.C.Combined for new Citywide Transportation fee .
Tierra Rejada/Spring A.O.C Combined for new Citywide Transportation fee .
Casey/Gabbert A.O.C Fee rescinded on 3/15/2017.
Freemont Storm Drain A.O.C No change.Development Agreement fee .
Walnut Canyon Traffic Noise
Attenuation
No change. Development Agreement / Area Specific
fee.
Police Facilities Fund Included in Nexus Study.
9
•Addition of a City Hall Improvements Fee
•Level of Service, Existing Inventory, and Planned
Facilities Methodology Updates
•Residential fees charged per square foot
3
1
2
CHANGES TO
THE FEE
PROGRAM
Combination of four fee programs into one “Citywide
Transportation Fee”:
•Traffic System Management
•Citywide Traffic Mitigation Fee
•Los Angeles Area of Contribution
•Tierra Rejada/Spring Road Area of Contribution
10
LIBRARY FACILITIES FEE
PLANNED FACILITIES METHOD
•17,500 SF Library to serve existing
service population
o Sized per the Civic Center Master
Plan
•4,500 SF Library Expansion to serve
future service population
o Future development will
contribute to the cost of the
4,500 SF future library expansion
•Cost per SF estimate using the
current Cost per SF for the 17,500 SF
Library project
o Escalation of fee will hopefully
keep in line with future inflation
Future Users Library Expansion
Library Expansion Square Feet 1 4,500
Cost per SF for Library Space $1,714.29
Cost of Library Expansion Attributable to Future Population $7,714,305
Future Service Population Growth (Capita)15,923
Cost per Capita $484.48
1 Expanded library square footage needed at buildout provided by City staff.
11
LIBRARY FACILITIES FEE
PROPOSED FEE & COMPARISON
Existing 1
Existing
(Adjusted) 2 Proposed
% Change
between Proposed
and Existing
(Adjusted)
Library
Land Use
Single Family (per SF)$0.38 $0.71 $0.73 2%
Multi-Family (per SF)$0.44 $0.83 $1.02 18%
Commercial (per 1,000 SF)$395.00 $740.10 $188.22 -293%
Office (per 1,000 SF)$370.00 $370.00 $376.45 2%
Industrial (per 1,000 SF)$370.00 $693.25 $75.29 -821%
1
2 Existing (Adjusted) Fees reflect the amount that would be in effect as of March 2023 if the fee had been indexed annually with
the LA Region ENR CCI since the last fee update.
Existing Fees are charged per dwelling unit for Residential Land Uses. To calculate the comparison between existing and
proposed fees, existing fees per dwelling unit were converted to per SF based on the SF assumptions of residential units within
this study.
Fee
12
PARK AND RECREATION FEE
FACILITY STANDARD & EXISTING INVENTORY METHOD
Park Development Cost Value
Park Development Cost (per Acre)1 $553,001
Required Acres/1,000 Residents2 5.00
Park Development Cost per 1,000 Residents $2,765,005
Total Park Cost per Capita $2,765.01
1
2 Based on the General Plan level of service.
Park Development Cost estimate uses Pleasant Valley Recreation & Park District
(City of Camarillo) average development cost per acre amount ($484,000) identified in
the Pleasant Valley Recreation and Park District Park Impact Fee Nexus Study, April
2021 (Appendix A). The cost estimate is adjusted to ENR CCI for Los Angeles Region
(April 2021 - 12139.56, March 2022 - 13870.23).
Recreation Facility Value
Recreation Square Footage 42,259
Recreation Facility Value 1 $12,631,552
Existing Service Population 36,395
Total Existing Level of Service per 1,000 Residents (1,161.12
Total Existing Level of Service per Capita (Cost)$347.07
1 Recreation Facility size and value based on the CJPIA Property
Schedule (prepared by Alliant Insurance Services, Inc.), dated March
24, 2022. Increased to March 2023 dollars by ENR BCI for Los
Angeles Region (March 2022 to March 2023).
Park Per Capita Calculation Recreation Per Capita Calculation
13
PARK AND RECREATION FEE
PROPOSED FEE
•Includes cost for facilities only –excludes land
•Park and Recreation Fee not charged on non-residential development
•Comparison to existing unavailable -current Park and Recreation Fee negotiated within Development
Agreements
Land Use
Park
Facilities Cost
Per
Capita
Recreation
Cost
Per Capita Density
Park &
Recreation
Fee
Per Unit
Administration
Fee
Per Unit 1
Total Fee
Per Unit
(Rounded)
Average
Unit Size
(SF)
Total Fee
per SF
(Rounded)
Residential
Single Family $2,765.01 $347.07 3.60 $11,203.48 $560.17 $11,763.65 2,500 $4.71
Multi-Family $2,765.01 $347.07 2.80 $8,713.82 $435.69 $9,149.51 1,400 $6.54
1 An administrative fee of 5% is included for (1) legal, accounting, and other administrative support and (2) development impact fee program
administration costs including revenue collection, revenue and cost accounting, mandated public reporting, and fee justification analysis.
14
CITY HALL IMPROVEMENT FEE
PLANNED FACILITIES METHOD
•New proposed fee
•Future City Hall Construction will
serve both existing and future
service population
•Costs allocated proportionately,
with future growth contributing
28%
Facility Amount
Moorpark Future City Hall Cost 1 $46,899,880
Fair Share Allocation
Total Future Service Population Growth 15,923
Total Buildout Service Population 57,175
Future Growth Fair Share Allocation 28%
Future Growth Fair Share Cost $13,061,422
Total per Capita (Cost)$820.29
Source:
1 Construction cost estimate is provided by the City based on project cost of the new
library (12/8/22). Anticipated construction is still far in advance (20+ years).
Includes design cost of $1,899,880.
15
CITY HALL IMPROVEMENT FEE
PROPOSED FEE
Land Use
Cost Per
Capita Density 1
Subtotal
Fee
Administration
Fee
Total Fee
(Rounded)
Average
Unit Size
(SF)
Total Fee
per SF
(Rounded)
Residential (Fee per Unit)(Fee per SF)
Single Family $820.29 3.60 $2,953.03 $147.65 $3,100.68 2,500 $1.24
Multi-Family $820.29 2.80 $2,296.80 $114.84 $2,411.64 1,400 $1.72
Non-Residential (Fee per 1,000 SF)
Commercial $303.51 1.00 $303.51 $15.18 $318.69
Office $303.51 2.00 $607.01 $30.35 $637.36
Industrial $303.51 0.40 $121.40 $6.07 $127.47
1 Density factor used for non-residential is based upon number of employees per 1,000 Building SF.
16
POLICE FACILITIES FEE
EXISTING INVENTORY METHOD
•Renewed methodology
•Police Service Center serves
existing and future service
population
•Fee includes Police Facility and
equipment costs
Facility SF Value
Police Services Center 1, 2 27,600 $21,431,765
Police Services Center Wash Shelter 1 900 $57,750
Facility Subtotal 28,500 $21,489,515
Buildout Service Population 57,175
Total Facility Buildout Level of Service per Capita (Cost)$375.86
Equipment3 Value
2009 Segway I2 Base Model $1,950
2009 Segway I2 Base Model $1,950
2010 Harley Davidson FLHTP Electra Glide $6,600
2012 BMW R1200TP $19,500
2016 Harley Davidson FLFLHTP $22,409
2016 Harley Davidson FLFLHTP $22,409
2018 Harley Davidson FLFLHTP $19,276
2019 Chevrolet Equinox $19,681
2019 Chevrolet Equinox $19,681
Equipment Subtotal $133,456
Existing Service Population 41,252
Total Existing Equipment Level of Service per Capita (Cost)$3.24
Total Level of Service per Capita (Cost)$379.09
Source:
1 Property size from City of Moorpark CJPIA Property Schedule (March 24, 2022).
2
3 Equipment list from City of Moorpark 2022 0324 Vehicle Schedule, vehicles older than 15
years were excluded. Values increased to March 2023 dollars by ENR BCI for Los Angeles
Region (March 2022 to March 2023).
Value from March 21, 2018 Agenda Report Public Hearing to Consider Resolution Updating the
Police Facilities Fee, brought forward to 2023 dollars via ENR CCI.
17
POLICE FACILITIES FEE
PROPOSED FEE & COMPARISON
Existing 1
Existing
(Adjusted) 2 Proposed
% Change
between Proposed
and Existing
(Adjusted)
Police
Land Use
Single Family (per SF)$0.47 $0.54 $0.57 5%
Multi-Family (per SF)$0.83 $0.97 $0.80 -21%
Commercial (per 1,000 SF)$750.00 $871.55 $147.27 -492%
Office (per 1,000 SF)$750.00 $871.55 $294.56 -196%
Industrial (per 1,000 SF)$750.00 $871.55 $58.92 -1379%
1
2 Existing (Adjusted) Fees reflect the amount that would be in effect as of March 2023 if the fee had been indexed annually with
the LA Region ENR CCI since the last fee update.
Existing Fees are charged per dwelling unit for Residential Land Uses. To calculate the comparison between existing and
proposed fees, existing fees per dwelling unit were converted to per SF based on the SF assumptions of residential units within
this study.
Fee
18
TRANSPORTATION FACILITIES
PROJECTS INCLUDED
CIP Transportation Facility Project Status
Total Project
Cost 1
Amount
Expended
(Estimated as
of 6/30/22)
LA AOC
(Fund 2014)
SP/TR AOC
(Fund 2015)
Traffic System
Management
(Fund 2001)
Citywide Traffic
Mitigation
(Fund 2002)
Endowment
(Fund 2111)
Grants & Other
Funds2
Transportation
DIF Eligible
Project Costs4
C0004 Moorpark Ave Widening Project (Casey to Third) -
Includes street realignment at First St and Poindexter
Ave (Prior Project 8057) and Rail Crossing
Improvements (Prior Project 8038)
Pending Staff Hire $2,815,620 $2,343,217 $0 $0 $0 $472,403 $0 $0 $472,403
C0021 LA Avenue Widening - Spring Road to Moorpark Ave Active Redesign $5,000,681 $3,277,956 $925,955 $0 $0 $0 $0 $796,770 $925,955
C0022 Spring Road Widening Active Construction $1,249,934 $475,366 $774,568 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $774,568
C0025 Route 23 North Alignment (Study)Pending $192,325 $192,325 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
C0027 Underground Utility District No. 2 Pending $1,710,240 $240 $1,710,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,710,000
C0030 LA Avenue Widening - Shasta Avenue Active Construction $1,688,147 $1,678,147 $10,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $10,000
C0033 Los Angeles Avenue Undergrounding Pending $468,001 $26,694 $441,021 $0 $286 $0 $0 $0 $441,307
C0037 Arroyo Drive Bike/Ped Project Active Construction $1,030,000 $158,144 $0 $0 $223,820 $0 $0 $648,036 $223,820
M0040 LA Ave Traffic Signals/Fiber Optic Upgrade Pending $950,000 $14,345 $935,655 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $935,655
NA North Hills Parkway Overcrossing State Route 233 Pending $128,413,129 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $128,413,129
NA Realignment Study for Moorpark Ave - Poindexter/First See C0004 TBD $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
NA Moorpark Ave Sound Walls Estimate $3,168,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,168,000
Total Transporation Facilities Costs $146,686,077 $8,166,434 $4,797,199 $0 $224,106 $472,403 $0 $1,444,806 $137,074,837
Notes:
1
2
3 In May 2008, a feasibility study prepared by Parsons estimated the total construction cost to be approximately $85 million. Costs have been escalated using LA ENR CCI (Feb 2008 at 9183.42, February 2023 at 13908.31). Includes the Gabbert Road UPRR crossing cost.
4 DIF Eligible costs are calculated by taking the Total Project cost and subtracting the Amount Expended and Other Funding Sources
Total Project Costs with an associated CIP number are identified in the CIP Budget for FY22/23 through 26/27.
Other funding sources include: Federal & State Grants, Gas Tax, General Fund, etc.
DIF Eligible Funding Other Funding Sources
19
TRANSPORTATION FACILITIES
SUMMARY
•Planned Facilities Method
•Merge Transportation Fees for ease of
administration and flexibility –keeping all
originally identified transportation projects
intact
•Traffic System Management
•Citywide Traffic Mitigation Fee
•Los Angeles Area of Contribution
•Tierra Rejada/Spring Area of
Contribution
•Identify Cost per Trip using Institute of
Transportation Engineers trip generation
assumptions for each land use
Total Cost of Transportation Facilities 1 $137,074,837
Less: LA AOC Fund Balance 2 ($8,975,494)
Less: SP/TR AOC Fund Balance 2 ($128,197)
Less: Citywide Traffic Mitigation Contribution ($472,403)
Less: Traffic System Management Contribution ($224,106)
Total Cost of Fee Program Transportation
Facilities $127,274,637
Future Trip Generation 57,875
Cost per Trip $2,199
1 Projected cost based upon CIP 22-23 Budget.
2 Fund balance as of November 30, 2022.
Cost per Trip
20
TRANSPORTATION FACILITIES
PROPOSED FEE & COMPARISON
Land Use
Cost
Per Trip
Trip
Generation1
Employees
per 1,000 SF
Subtotal
Fee
Administration
Fee
Total Fee
(Rounded)Total Fee
Residential (per Unit)(per SF)
Single Family $2,199 9.43 NA $20,737 $1,037 $21,774 $8.71
Multi-Family $2,199 5.64 NA $12,402 $620 $13,022 $9.30
Non-Residential (Fee per 1,000 SF)
Commercial $2,199 8.71 1.00 $19,153 $958 $20,111
Office $2,199 3.33 2.00 $14,645 $732 $15,377
Industrial $2,199 5.05 0.40 $4,442 $222 $4,664
1 ITE 11.1 Edition Daily Trip Generation Rate. ITE 11th Edition notes: All land uses in the retail & services are entitled to a "pass-by"
trip reduction of 60% if less than 50,000 SF or a reduction of 40% if equal to or greater than 50,000 SF. This Study assumes a 50%
"pass-by" trip reduction.
21
TRANSPORTATION FACILITIES
PROPOSED FEE & COMPARISON
Existing 1
Existing
(Adjusted) 2 Proposed
% Change
between Proposed
and Existing
(Adjusted)
Citywide Transportation 3
Land Use
Single Family (per SF)$4.54 $6.33 $8.71 27%
Multi-Family (per SF)$7.76 $10.74 $9.30 -16%
Commercial (per 1,000 SF)$5,820.11 $8,485.76 $20,111.00 58%
Office (per 1,000 SF)$3,208.42 $4,464.67 $15,377.00 71%
Industrial (per 1,000 SF)$3,208.42 $4,464.67 $4,664.00 4%
1
2
3
Existing (Adjusted) Fees reflect the amount that would be in effect as of March 2023 if the fee had been indexed annually with
the LA Region ENR CCI since the last fee update.
Existing Transportation Fee is calculated by averaging the per 1,000 Building SF rate of Spring/Tierra Rajada Road AOC Fee and
the Los Angeles Ave AOC Fee and adding the Traffic System Management Fee.
Existing Fees are charged per dwelling unit for Residential Land Uses. To calculate the comparison between existing and
proposed fees, existing fees per dwelling unit were converted to per SF based on the SF assumptions of residential units within
this study.
Fee
22
FEE SUMMARY
Land Use 1 Library
Park &
Recreation City Hall Police
Citywide
Transportation
Residential
Single Family $0.73 $4.71 $1.24 $0.57 $8.71
Multi-Family $1.02 $6.54 $1.72 $0.80 $9.30
Non-Residential
Commercial $188 N/A $319 $147 $20,111
Office $376 N/A $637 $295 $15,377
Industrial $75 N/A $127 $59 $4,664
1
(Fee per Building Square Foot)
(Fee per 1,000 Building Square Feet)
An administrative fee of 5% is included in the fees shown for (1) legal, accounting, and other administrative support and (2)
development impact fee program administration costs including revenue collection, revenue and cost accounting, mandated
public reporting, and fee justification analysis. The administration fee is calculated on a fee by fee basis. Please refer to the
individual fee calculation tables for a breakdown of the administration fee.
23
FEE COMPARISON -TRANSPORTATION
Jurisdiction Single Family Multi-Family Commercial Office Industrial
Moorpark (PROPOSED)8.71$ 9.30$ 20,111.00$ 15,377.00$ 4,664.00$
Moorpark (EXISTING)1,2 6.33$ 10.74$ 8,485.76$ 4,464.67$ 4,464.67$
Oxnard 4.19$ 3.53$ 7,037.80$ 10,813.11$ 5,505.79$
Thousand Oaks3 2.73$ 3.01$ 9,340.00$ 11,100.00$ 3,170.00$
Ventura 2.10$ 2.25$ 4,130.00$ 4,415.00$ 1,380.00$
Camarillo 1.20$ 1.20$ 19,130.00$ 5,916.00$ 2,027.00$
Simi Valley4 0.75$ 0.89$ 19,130.00$ 5,916.00$ 2,027.00$
Average 3.72$ 4.42$ 12,480.65$ 8,285.97$ 3,319.78$
3 Thousand Oaks' non-residential land uses are charged per SF (converted to per 1,000 SF for this table).
Furthermore, there are site specific traffic fees that are not shown in this table.
(per square foot)(per 1,000 square feet)
4 Simi Valley charges a Traffic Impact fee on all land uses per trip of $107.50. Comparison uses Moorpark's assumption on
trip generation for each land use.
1 Existing Fees are charged per dwelling unit for Residential Land Uses. To calculate the comparison between existing and
proposed fees, existing fees per dwelling unit were converted to per SF based on the SF assumptions of residential units
within this study.
2 Existing Transportation Fee is calculated by averaging the per 1,000 Building SF rate of Spring/Tierra Rajada Road AOC Fee
and the Los Angeles Ave AOC Fee and adding the Traffic System Management Fee. The FAR assumption to calculate the
per 1,000 Building SF is 0.35 for Commercial and 0.45 for Office/Industrial. Existing Fee does not include the Citywide
Traffic Mitigation Fund Fee since that fee amount is negotiated.
24
PROPOSED FEE COMPARISON -PARK &
RECREATION
Single Family Multi-Family
Jurisdiction
Moorpark 1 4.71$ 6.54$
Simi Valley --
Camarillo2 3.09$ 3.88$
Thousand Oaks --
Oxnard 2.80$ 3.30$
Ventura3 0.69$ 0.78$
Average 2.82$ 3.62$
1 Moorpark's multi-family land use is High Density (attached 4+ units).
2 Properties in Camarillo pay the Pleasant Valley Recreation & Park District Fee.
3 Assumes a 3 bedroom unit for Single Family and 2 Bedrooms for Multi-Family.
(per square foot)
25
E-mail:
megan.quinn@weareharris.com
Phone:
916.306.5704
THANK YOU
QUESTIONS?