HomeMy WebLinkAboutRES PC 2022 672 2022 0628RESOLUTION NO. PC-2022-672
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL
APPROVAL OF GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 2021-01,
DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT NO. 2021-01, ZONE CHANGE NO. 2021-
01, VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 2021-01, AND RESIDENTIAL
PLANNED DEVELOPMENT NO. 2021-01 FOR THE SUBDIVISION AND
DEVELOPMENT OF 47 RESIDENTIAL UNITS, PRIVATE ROADS,
COMMUNITY OPEN SPACE, AND ASSOCIATED IMPROVEMENTS ON
7.4 ACRES OF PROPERTY, LOCATED AT 11930 LOS ANGELES
AVENUE (BELTRAMO RANCH ROAD), AND INCLUDING A GENERAL
PLAN AMENDMENT LAND USE DESIGNATION CHANGE FROM PARK
AND LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL TO HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL,
AND A ZONE CHANGE FROM SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL AND
RURAL EXCLUSIVE TO RESIDENTIAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT, AND
ADOPTION OF A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION PURSUANT
TO THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT IN
CONNECTION THEREWITH, ON THE APPLICATION OF JOE OFTELIE
ON BEHALF OF WARMINGTON RESIDENTIAL
WHEREAS, on June 4, 2021, Warmington Residential (Applicant) submitted a
development application for General Plan Amendment (GPA), Development Agreement
(DA), Zone Change (ZCH), Vesting Tentative Tract Map (VTTM), and Residential
Planned Development (RPO) for the subdivision of land and development of 47 detached
single-family residential units, private roads, community open space, and associated
improvements (Project, Proposed Project). The Project includes an application for a GPA
land use designation change for a portion of the 7.4 acres of land from Park (P) and Low
Density Residential (L) to High Density Residential (H), as well as a ZCH from Single-
Family Residential (R-1) and Rural Exclusive (RE-20) to Residential Planned
Development (RPD-7U). The request also includes a VTTM to subdivide the property
into eight common area parcels and 47 residential condominium parcels. The Project
Site includes 7.4 acres, located at 11930 Los Angeles Avenue (Assessor's Parcel
Numbers [APNs] 504-0-021-195, 506-0-030-210, 506-0-030-220, 506-0-030-235, 506-0-
030-045, and 506-0-030-055 (Project Site, Site); and
WHEREAS, on May 13, 2022, the City of Moorpark Community Development
Department published pursuant to CEQA a Notice of Intent to Adopt a Mitigated Negative
Declaration (MND) for the Beltramo Ranch Project (State Clearinghouse Number
2022050309) analyzing the Project's potential impacts on the environment and accepted
public comments in accordance with CEQA Guidelines Section 15105 for a period of 30
days between May 13, 2022 and June 13, 2022; and
WHEREAS, the City prepared written responses to all comments received on the
Draft MND and those responses to comments are incorporated into the Final MND; and
Beltramo Ranch
Resolution No. PC-2022-672
Page2
WHEREAS, at a duly noticed public hearing on June 28, 2022, the Planning
Commission considered the MND and the proposed Project, including the agenda report
and any supplements thereto, and written public comment; opened the public hearing and
took and considered public testimony both for and against the proposal.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
MOORPARK, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTATION: The Planning Commission
has read, reviewed, and considered the Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration
prepared for the project prior to making a recommendation on the project. The Planning
Commission concurs with the Community Development Director that there is no
substantial evidence that the project or any of its aspects may cause a significant effect
on the environment and recommends adoption of the Mitigated Negative Declaration and
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP) prepared for this project.
SECTION 2. RESIDENTIAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT FINDINGS: Based upon
the information set forth in the staff report, accompanying studies, and oral and written
public testimony, the Planning Commission makes the following findings in accordance
with City of Moorpark, Municipal Code Section 17.44.040:
1. The site design, including structure location, size, height, setbacks, massing,
scale, architectural style and colors, and landscaping, is consistent with the
provisions of the general plan, zoning ordinance, and any other applicable
regulations. The proposed deviations from developments standards, allowed
pursuant to MMC 17.44.040.C, have been found compatible with nearby
residential developments.
2. The site design would not create negative impacts on or impair the utility of
properties, structures, or uses in the surrounding area. As proposed and
conditioned, the Project Site provides required parking, access improvements, site
lighting, utility upgrades, storm water detention, and landscape improvements
necessary to serve the proposed use and prevent impacts to adjacent properties.
The proposed Conditions of Approval would ensure the proposed office use would
not negatively impact the surrounding area.
3. The proposed residential use and site improvements are compatible with the
existing and permitted uses in the surrounding area. The Project is compatible to
similar nearby uses including adjacent existing and entitled residential
developments to the east and west and industrial office park to the north. The
proposed Project includes architectural elements, colors and materials similar to
the nearby residential uses and well-developed landscape plan which will help
screen the residential development from existing residential neighborhoods and
nearby travel routes.
Beltramo Ranch
Resolution No. PC-2022-672
Page 3
SECTION 3. VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP FINDINGS: Based upon the
information set forth in the staff report(s), accompanying studies, and oral and written
public testimony, the Planning Commission makes the following findings in accordance
with City of Moorpark, Municipal Code Title 16 Subdivisions and the Subdivision Map Act:
1. The VTTM conforms to the development standards applicable to the General Plan,
zoning and subdivision codes and other applicable standards and guidelines. The
proposed deviations from developments standards, allowed pursuant to MMC
17.44.040.C, have been found compatible with nearby residential developments.
2. The design and proposed site improvements in the Project are consistent with the
development standards applicable to the General Plan, zoning and subdivision
codes, and other applicable standards and guidelines. The proposed deviations
from developments standards, allowed pursuant to MMC 17.44.040.C, have been
found compatible with nearby residential developments.
3. The site is physically suitable for the proposed residential development, and
proposed subdivision, in that all City development standards, including access,
have been met by the proposed project. The Project Site is relatively flat and
requires minimal grading to develop the proposed Project. The proposed design
and site improvements are consistent with the General Plan, zoning and
subdivision codes and other applicable standards and guidelines, except where
authorized to deviate as noted in MMC 17.44.040.C.
4. The design of the subdivision and the proposed improvements are not likely to
cause substantial environmental effects. Pursuant to California Environmental
Quality Act (CEQA), the Project includes an Initial Study and a MND which
considered potential significant environmental impacts associated with the Project.
The MND and associated studies did not identify any known habitat or sensitive
species that would be impacted by the Project. The MND includes a Mitigation
Monitoring and Reporting Programs which would reduce any potential impacts to
the environment to a less than significant level. Therefore, the project would not
cause substantial impacts to the environment.
5. The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause serious public health problems,
in that adequate sanitation, water services, fire protection, and related
infrastructure are both feasible, proposed and required as a condition of this
development.
6. The design of the subdivision and the type of improvements would not conflict with
easements acquired by the public at large, for access through, or use of the
property within the proposed subdivision, in that full access to and from Los
Angeles Avenue has been incorporated in the design of this project. The Project
Beltramo Ranch
Resolution No. PC-2022-672
Page4
has been conditioned to include new and modified easements to reflect
improvements associated with offsite utility construction. The Project would
provide access easements to neighboring residents and public users of the Project
Site.
SECTION 4. DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT FINDINGS: Based upon the
information set forth in the staff report(s), accompanying studies, and oral and written
public testimony, the Planning Commission makes the following findings in accordance
with Government Code Section 65402(a) and Moorpark Municipal Code 15.40.100:
1. The provisions of the development agreement are consistent with the General Plan
in that the Project will provide for the orderly developed of land identified in the
City's General Plan and Zoning Ordinance as appropriate for residential
development and the Development Agreement will strengthen the planning
process by providing vesting development rights, addressing the timing of
development, determine development fees and the provision of specific
community benefits, including parks and affordable housing.
2. The provisions of the Development Agreement and the assurances that said
agreement places upon the project are consistent with the provisions of Chapter
15.40 of the MMC because the Development Agreement contains the elements
required by Section 15.40.030 and shall be processed through a duly noticed
public hearing process as required by law.
SECTION 5. PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: The Planning
Commission recommends to the City Council the adoption of the Initial Study/Mitigated
Negative Declaration and associated Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
(MMRP) as depicted in Exhibit E and the approval of General Plan Amendment (GPA)
No. 2021-01 as depicted in Exhibit D, Development Agreement (DA) No. 2021-01 as
depicted in Exhibit B, Zone Change (ZCH) 2021-01 as depicted in Exhibit D, Vesting
Tentative Tract Map No. 2021-01 (VTTM 6061) as depicted in Exhibit A, and Residential
Planned Development (RPO) No. 2021-01 subject to the Conditions of Approval found in
Exhibit C attached.
SECTION 6. FILING OF RESOLUTION: The Community Development
Director shall cause a certified resolution to be filed in the book of original resolutions.
The action of the foregoing direction was approved by the following vote:
AYES: Commissioners Alva, Brodsly, Rokos, and Chair Landis
NOES:
Beltramo Ranch
Resolution No. PC-2022-672
Page 5
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT: Commissioner Barrett
PASSED, AND ADOPTED this 28 th of June, 2022.
Carlene Saxton
Community Development Director
Attachments:
Exhibit A: Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 2021-01 (VTTM 6061)
Exhibit B: Development Agreement
Exhibit C: Conditions of Approval
Exhibit D: Proposed General Plan Land Use and Zoning Map Amendments
Exhibit E: Initial Study/ Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring and
Reporting Program (State Clearinghouse No. 2022050327) incorporated by reference:
https ://www.moorparkca.gov/DocumentCenterNiew/13604/Beltramo-M ND
1234567891011121314151617181920212223242526272829303132333435363738394041424344454647ACCEEAHBAEFDCGEARTHWORK QUANTITIESW. LOS ANGELES AVE.LORETTA DRIVEMAUREEN LANEELDERBERRY AVE.BELTRAMO RANCH RD."A" DRIVEBELTRAMO RANCH RD.WARMINGTON RESIDENTIALWARMINGTON RESIDENTIAL3090 PULLMAN STREETCOSTA MESA, CA 92626UNITED CIVIL, INC.30141 AGOURA ROAD, SUITE 215AGOURA HILLS, CA 91301PH: (818) 707-8648FAX: (818) 707-8649ENGINEERING SITE PLAN VTTM NO. 6061BELTRAMO RANCH11930-11944 WEST LOS ANGELES AVENUEMOORPARK, CA 21SITE INFORMATIONLEGEND:PRIVATE DWY AND FIRELANEPRIVATE DWY AND FIRELANEPRIVATE DWY AND FIRELANEBBDDFFResolution No. PC-2022-672
Page 6
EXHIBIT A
1234567891011121314151617181920212223242526272829303132333435363738394041424344454647HBAEFDCCGFDCE6GGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB222112842FFFFFGGGG7262E774777919414310HH6224BBBBBBBBBBB678921111299FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGG4242422442222277772222222222222782222222222222111111111111111111116145522FBELTRAMO RANCH11930-11944 WEST LOS ANGELES AVENUEMOORPARK, CA WARMINGTON RESIDENTIALWARMINGTON RESIDENTIAL3090 PULLMAN STREETCOSTA MESA, CA 92626UNITED CIVIL, INC.30141 AGOURA ROAD, SUITE 215AGOURA HILLS, CA 91301PH: (818) 707-8648FAX: (818) 707-8649VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO.6061W. LOS ANGELES AVE.LELLLOOOOLORETTA DRIVEMAUREEN LANEELDERBERRY AVE.BELTRAMO RANCH RD."A" DRIVELEGEND:UTILITIESLAND USE/ZONING INFORMATION:PLAN REQUIREMENTS NOTESLEGAL DESCRIPTIONPROPOSED BUILDING SETBACKSW. LOS ANGELES AVE.GENERAL NOTESAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAABELTRAMO RANCH RD.TRAMO RANCH RD.BEELTRAMMOMONCHHORANRDNCBNELTRAMO RANAAEENRRRRRRNCH RDRAMO RANMMNRELTRBBRRAAAAAAAAABBBCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCBASIS OF BEARINGSBENCHMARKEARTHWORK QUANTITIESDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDPRIVATE DRIVEWAY AND FIRELANEENALADFIRELNDDRIVEWAY ANEPRIVATPNNNNEEEEAAAAPPPPPPPPPPPPPLLELLPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPVAAVAATAAYAYYYYYENAD FIRELAYANDDNEAAYE DRIVEWAATEEAVAPRIVPPPPPPPVAAAAYYPRIVATE DRIVEWAY AND FIRELANEE DRIVEWAY AEWAY AND FIRELANEEWAYVEEVEVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVPRIVATE DRIVVVND FIRELANEAYAEWAYVEEVEVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVDRIVATWAYYEWEEEVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVIVVVRVRIRWAY AND FIRELANEWEWVEEVEVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVWVVVIVVVRIPRIVATE DRVRIEASEMENTS NOTES:Resolution No. PC-2022-672
Page 7
Recording Requested By
And When Recorded Return to:
CITY CLERK
CITY OF MOORPARK
799 Moorpark Avenue
Moorpark, California 93021
EXEMPT FROM RECORDER'S FEES
Pursuant to Government Code
§ 6103
DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT
BY AND BETWEEN
CITY OF MOORPARK
AND
WARMINGTON RESIDENTIAL CALIFORNIA, INC.
EXHIBIT B
Beltramo Ranch
Resolution No. PC-2022-672
Page 8
DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT
This Development Agreement the ("Agreement") is made and entered into
on ______________, 2022 by and between the CITY OF MOORPARK, a
municipal corporation (referred to hereinafter as "City") and WARMINGTON
RESIDENTIAL CALIFORNIA, INC., a California corporation, the owners of a legal
or equitable interest with respect to certain real property within the City of Moorpark
generally referred to as “Beltramo Ranch” and Residential Planned Development
Permit 2021-01 (referred to hereinafter as "Developer"). City and Developer are
referred to hereinafter collectively as a "Party" and collectively as the "Parties." In
consideration of the mutual covenants and agreements contained in this
Agreement, City and Developer agree as follows:
1.Recitals: This Agreement is made with respect to the following facts and
for the following purposes, each of which is acknowledged as true and correct by
the Parties:
1.1 Pursuant to Government Code Section 65864 et seq. and Moorpark
Municipal Code Chapter 15.40, City is authorized to enter into a
binding contractual agreement with any person having a legal or
equitable interest in real property within its boundaries for the
development of such property in order to establish certainty in the
development process.
1.2 Developer holds a legal or equitable interest with respect to certain
real property in the City of Moorpark identified in the legal description
set forth in Exhibit “A” which exhibit is attached hereto and
incorporated by reference, commonly known as Beltramo Ranch,
referred to hereinafter as the “Property”.
1.3 Prior to, and in connection with, the approval of this Agreement, the
City Council reviewed the project to be developed pursuant to this
Agreement as required by the California Environmental Quality Act
(“CEQA.”) On __________, 2022, the City Council adopted
Resolution No. 2022-____, adopting the Mitigated Negative
Declaration (“MND”) prepared for this Agreement and the Project
Approvals as defined in Subsection 1.4 of this Agreement.
1.4 General Plan Amendment (GPA) No. 2021-01, Zone Change (ZCH)
No. 2021-01, Residential Planned Development (RPD) Permit No.
2021-01, Vesting Tentative Tract Map (VTTM) No. 2021-01 including
all subsequently approved modifications and permit adjustments to
the RPD Permit, VTTM, and all amendments thereto (collectively the
“Project Approvals"; individually a “Project Approval") provide for the
Beltramo Ranch
Resolution No. PC-2022-672
Page 9
development of the Property with 47 single-family residential units
and the construction of any improvements in connection therewith
(the “Project"), as shown on the site plan (Exhibit “C”).
1.5 By this Agreement, City desires to obtain the binding agreement of
Developer to develop the Property in accordance with the Project
Approvals and this Agreement. In consideration thereof, City agrees
to limit the future exercise of certain of its governmental and
proprietary powers to the extent specified in this Agreement.
1.6 By this Agreement, Developer desires to obtain the binding
agreement of City to permit the development of the Property in
accordance with the Project Approvals and th is Agreement. In
consideration thereof and subject to the terms and conditions set
forth herein, Developer agrees to waive its rights to legally challenge
the limitations and conditions imposed upon the development of the
Property pursuant to the Project Approvals and this Agreement and
to provide the public benefits and improvements specified in this
Agreement.
1.7 City and Developer acknowledge and agree that the consideration to
be exchanged pursuant to this Agreement is fair, just and reasonable
and that this Agreement is consistent with the General Plan of City,
as amended by GPA No. 2021-01.
1.8 On June 28, 2022, the Planning Commission commenced a duly
noticed public hearing on this Agreement, and at the conclusion of
the hearing on _________, 2022, recommended approval of this
Agreement.
1.9 On __________, 2022, the City Council of City (“City Council”)
commenced a duly noticed public hearing on this Agreement, and
following the conclusion of the hearing closed the hearing and
introduced and provided first reading to Ordinance No. ___ (the
“Enabling Ordinance”) that approves this Agreement. Thereafter on
__________, 2022, the City Council gave second reading to and
adopted the Enabling Ordinance.
Beltramo Ranch
Resolution No. PC-2022-672
Page 10
2.Property Subject To This Agreement. All of the Property shall be subject
to this Agreement. The Property may also be referred to hereinafter as "the site."
3.Binding Effect. The burdens of this Agreement are binding upon, and the
benefits of the Agreement inure to, each Party and each of their respective
assignees and successors in interest thereto (subject to Subsection 3.2 below) and
constitute covenants that run with the Property. Whenever the terms "City" and
"Developer" are used herein, such terms shall include every successive assignee
and successor in interest thereto.
3.1 Constructive Notice and Acceptance. Every person who acquires
any right, title or interest in or to any portion of the Property shall be
conclusively deemed to have consented and agreed to be bound by
this Agreement, whether or not any reference to the Agreement is
contained in the instrument by which such person acquired such
right, title or interest, subject to Subsection 3.2 below.
3.2 Release Upon Subsequent Transfer. Upon the conveyance of
Developer’s interest in the Property or any portion thereof by
Developer or its successor(s) in interest, the transferor shall be
released from its obligations hereunder with respect to the portion of
Property conveyed as of the effective date of the conveyance,
provided that the transferee expressly assumes all obligations of the
transferred portion of the Property and a copy of the executed
assignment and assumption agreement is delivered to the City prior
to the conveyance. Failure to provide a written assumption
agreement hereunder shall not negate, modify or otherwise affect the
liability of the transferee pursuant to this Agreement. Nothing
contained herein shall be deemed to grant to City discretion to
approve or deny any such conveyance. Notwithstanding the
foregoing, this Agreement shall not be binding upon the transferee
of a Completed Unit with respect to the transferee’s interest in such
Completed Unit, and the rights and obligations of Developer under
this Agreement shall not run with the portion of the Property that is
conveyed with the Completed Unit after such conveyance of the
Completed Unit by Developer or its successor in interest. For
purposes of this Agreement, “Completed Unit” means a completed
residential unit within the Property for which the City has issued a
certificate of occupancy.
Beltramo Ranch
Resolution No. PC-2022-672
Page 11
4.Development of the Property. The following provisions shall govern the
subdivision, development and use of the Property:
4.1 Permitted Uses. The permitted and conditionally permitted uses of
the Property shall be limited to those that are allowed by the Project
Approvals and this Agreement.
4.2 Development Standards. All design and development standards,
including but not limited to density or intensity of use and maximum
height and size of buildings, that shall be applicable to the Property
are set forth in the Project Approvals and this Agreement.
4.3 Building Standards. All construction on the Property shall adhere to
all City building codes in effect at the time the plan check or permit is
approved per Title 15 of the Moorpark Municipal Code and to any
federal or state building requirements that are then in effect
(collectively the “Building Codes").
4.4 Reservations and Dedications. All reservations and dedications of
land for public purposes that are applicable to the Property are set
forth in the Project Approvals and this Agreement.
4.5 Phasing. The City and Developer acknowledge that Developer
cannot predict when or in what order the Project will be developed.
Such decisions depend upon numerous factors which are not within
the control of Developer including, but not limited to, market
orientation and demand, interest rates, competition and similar
factors beyond the control of Developer. Except as provided in this
Agreement, Developer shall have the discretion to develop the
Project in phases and in such order as Developer deems appropriate
within the exercise of its subjective and independent business
judgment. Specifically, City and Developer agree that Developer
shall be entitled to apply for and receive permits, maps, certificates
of occupancy and other entitlements to use at any time that this
Agreement is in effect, provided that such actions are in accordance
with the City Laws, this Agreement and the Project Approvals.
Because the California Supreme Court held in Pardee Construction
Co. vs. City of Camarillo, 37 Cal.3d 465 (1984), that failure of the
parties therein to provide for the timing of development resulted in a
later-adopted initiative restricting the timing of development to prevail
over such parties' agreement, the parties herein intend to cure that
deficiency by acknowledging and providing that Developer shall have
the right (without obligation) to develop the Project in such order and
at such rate and at such time as Developer deems appropriate within
the exercise of its subjective business judgment, subject to the terms
of this Agreement and the Project Approvals.
Beltramo Ranch
Resolution No. PC-2022-672
Page 12
5.3 Issuance of Subsequent Approvals. Applications for land use
approvals, entitlements and permits, including without limitation
subdivision maps (e.g. tentative, vesting tentative, parcel, vesting
parcel, and final maps), subdivision improvement agreements and
other agreements relating to the Project, lot line adjustments,
preliminary and final planned development permits, use permits,
design review approvals (e.g. site plans, architectural plans and
landscaping plans), encroachment permits, and sewer and water
connections that are necessary to or desirable for the development
of the Project (collectively the “Subsequent Approvals"; individually
a “Subsequent Approval") shall be consistent with the Project
Approvals and this Agreement. For purposes of this Agreement,
Subsequent Approvals do not include building permits.
Subsequent Approvals shall be governed by the Project Approvals
and by the applicable provisions of the Moorpark General Plan, the
Moorpark Municipal Code and other City ordinances, resolutions,
rules, regulations, policies, standards and requirements as most
recently adopted or approved by the City Council, or through the
initiative or referendum process, and in effect at the time that the
application for the Subsequent Approval is deemed complete by City
(collectively "City Laws"), except City Laws that:
(a)change any permitted or conditionally permitted uses of the
Property from what is allowed by the Project Approvals;
(b)limit or reduce the density or intensity of the Project, or any
part thereof, or otherwise require any reduction in the number
of proposed buildings or other improvements from what is
allowed by the Project Approvals;
(c)limit or control the rate, timing, phasing or sequencing of the
approval, development or construction of all or any part of the
Project in any manner, provided that all infrastructure required
by the Project Approvals to serve the portion of the Property
covered by the Subsequent Approval is in place or is
scheduled to be in place prior to completion of construction;
(d)are not uniformly applied on a citywide basis to all
substantially similar types of development projects or to all
properties with similar land use designations; or
(g)modify the land use from what is permitted by the City's
General Plan Land Use Element at the Operative Date of this
Agreement or that prohibits or restricts the establishment or
expansion of urban services including but not limited to
community sewer systems to the Project.
Beltramo Ranch
Resolution No. PC-2022-672
Page 13
5.4 Modification of Approvals. Throughout the term of this Agreement,
Developer shall have the right, at its election and without risk to or
waiver of any right that is vested in it pursuant to this section, to apply
to City for modifications to Project Approvals and for Subsequent
Approvals. The approval or conditional approval of any such
modification shall not require an amendment to this Agreement,
provided that, in addition to any other findings that may be required
in order to approve or conditionally approve the modification, a
finding is made that the modification is consistent with this
Agreement and does not alter the permitted uses, density, intensity,
maximum height, size of buildings or reservations and dedications
as contained in the Project Approvals.
5.5 Issuance of Building Permits. No building permit shall be
unreasonably withheld or delayed from Developer if Developer is in
compliance with this Agreement and the Project Approvals and
Subsequent Approvals. In addition, no final building permit, final
inspection or certificate of occupancy will be unreasonably withheld
or delayed from Developer if all infrastructure required by the Project
Approvals, Subsequent Approvals, and this Agreement to serve the
portion of the Property covered by the final building permit is in place
or is scheduled to be in place prior to completion of construction , the
Developer is in compliance with all provisions of this Agreement, the
Project Approvals and Subsequent Approvals, and all of the other
relevant provisions of the Project Approvals, Subsequent Approvals
and this Agreement have been satisfied. Consistent with Subsection
5.1 of this Agreement, in no event shall building permits be allocated
on any annual numerical basis or on any arbitrary allocation basis.
5.6 Moratorium on Development. Nothing in this Agreement shall
prevent City, whether by the City Council or through the initiative or
referendum process, from adopting or imposing a moratorium on the
processing and issuance of Subsequent Approvals and building
permits and on the finalizing of building permits by means of a final
inspection or certificate of occupancy, provided that the moratorium
is adopted or imposed (i) on a Citywide basis to all substantially
similar types of development projects and properties with similar land
use designations and (ii) as a result of a utility shortage or a
reasonably foreseeable utility shortage including without limitation a
shortage of water, sewer treatment capacity, electricity or natural
gas.
Beltramo Ranch
Resolution No. PC-2022-672
Page 14
6.Developer Agreements.
6.1 Development as a Residential Project. Developer shall comply with
(i) this Agreement, (ii) the Project Approvals, (iii) all Subsequent
Approvals for which it was the applicant or a successor in interest to
the applicant and (iv) MND and any subsequent or supplemental
environmental actions. Developer agrees not to apply for any non-
residential uses on the Property.
6.2 Development Fee Per Unit. As a condition of, and immediately prior
to, the issuance of a building permit for each residential dwelling unit
within the Property, Developer shall pay City a one -time
development fee as described herein (the “Development Fee”). The
Development Fee may be expended by City in its sole and unfettered
discretion. The amount of the Development Fee shall be ten
thousand, nine hundred eighty-nine dollars and twenty cents
($10,989.20) per residential unit. The Development Fee shall be
adjusted annually commencing January 1, 2024, by the Consumer
Price Index (CPI). The annual CPI adjustment shall be determined
by using the information provided by the U.S. Department of Labor,
Bureau of Labor Statistics, for all urban consumers within the Los
Angeles/Long Beach/Anaheim metropolitan area during the prior
year. The calculation shall be made using the month of October over
the prior October.
In the event there is a decrease in the referenced Index for any
annual indexing, the current amount of the fee shall remain until such
time as the next subsequent annual indexing which results in an
increase.
Beltramo Ranch
Resolution No. PC-2022-672
Page 15
5.Vesting of Development Rights.
5.1 Vested Right to Develop, Timing of Development. Developer and its
successors in interest shall have the vested right to develop the
Property or any portion thereof in accordance with the terms and
provisions of the Project Approvals and this Agreement. The Parties
intend that this Agreement, together with the Project Approvals, shall
serve as the controlling document for all subsequent action s,
discretionary and ministerial, relating to the development and
occupancy of the Property or any portion thereof, including, without
limitation, all Subsequent Approvals (as defined below). Developer
shall have the right, without obligation, to develop the Property or any
portion thereof in such order and at such rate and times as Developer
deems appropriate within the exercise of its subjective business
judgment.
Except as otherwise provided in Section 5.6, n o future amendment
of any existing City ordinance or resolution, or future adoption of any
ordinance, resolution or other action, that purports to limit rate ,
timing, density, intensity or configuration of development of the
Property (or any portion thereof) over time or alter the sequencing of
development phases, whether adopted or imposed by the City
Council or through the initiative or referendum process or by any
agency of the City, shall apply to the Property or any portion thereof
provided the Property is developed in accordance with the Project
Approvals and this Agreement. Nothing in this subsection shall be
construed to limit City's right to ensure that Developer timely provides
all infrastructure required by the Project Approvals, Subsequent
Approvals, and this Agreement.
5.2 Amendment of Project Approvals. No amendment of any of the
Project Approvals, whether adopted or approved by the City Council
or through the initiative or referendum process, shall apply to any
portion of the Property, unless the Developer has agreed in writing
to the amendment.
Beltramo Ranch
Resolution No. PC-2022-672
Page 16
6.3 Traffic Mitigation Fee. As a condition of the issuance of a building
permit for each residential dwelling unit within the boundaries of the
Property, Developer shall pay City a one-time traffic mitigation fee as
described herein (“Citywide Traffic Fee”). The Citywide Traffic Fee
may be expended by City in its sole and unfettered discretion. The
amount of the Citywide Traffic Fee shall be fourteen thousand, eight
hundred sixty one dollars and ninety four cents ($14,861.94) per
residential unit. The Citywide Traffic Fee shall be adjusted annually
commencing January 1, 2024 and annually thereafter by the change
in the Caltrans Highway Bid Price Index (Bid Price Index) for
Selected California Construction Items for the twelve (12) month
period available on December 31 of the preceding year (“annual
indexing”). In the event there is a decrease in the Bid Price Index for
any annual indexing, the current amount of the fee shall remain until
such time as the next subsequent annual indexing which results in
an increase.
6.4 Los Angeles Avenue Area of Contribution (LAAOC) Fees. Developer
shall pay the LAAOC fee in effect at the time of building permit
issuance for each residential dwelling unit within the Property.
6.5 Air Quality Fees. Developer agrees that the Mitigation Measures
included in the City Council approved MND and MMRP, or
subsequent environmental clearance document approved by the
Council, set forth the mitigation requirements for air quality impacts.
Developer agrees to pay to City a one-time air quality mitigation fee,
as described herein (“Air Quality Fee”), in satisfaction of the
Transportation Demand Management Fund mitigation requirement
for the Project. The Air Quality Fee may be expended by City in its
sole discretion for reduction of regional air pollution emissions and to
mitigate residual Project air quality impacts.
Beltramo Ranch
Resolution No. PC-2022-672
Page 17
The Air Quality Fee shall be two thousand, forty-one dollars and thirty
six cents ($2,041.36) per residential dwelling unit within the Property
to be paid prior to the issuance of a building permit for each
residential dwelling unit in the Project. If the Air Quality Fee is not
paid by January 1, 2024, then commencing on January 1, 2024, and
annually thereafter, the Air Quality Fee shall be adjusted by any
increase in the CPI until all fees have been paid. The CPI increase
shall be determined by using the information provided by the U.S.
Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, for all urban
consumers within the Los Angeles/Long Beach/Anaheim
metropolitan area during the prior year. The calculation shall be
made using the month of October over the prior month of October.
In the event there is a decrease in the CPI for any annual indexing,
the fee shall remain at its then current amount until such time as the
next subsequent annual indexing which results in an increase.
6.6 Park Fees. Prior to the issuance of the first building permit for a
residential dwelling unit within the Property, the Developer shall pay
a one-time fee in lieu of the dedication of parkland and related
improvements (“Park Fee”). The amount of the Park Fee shall be six
hundred ninety-seven thousand, eight hundred sixty-eight dollars
and eighty-seven cents ($697,868.87) within the Property. If the
Park Fee is not paid by January 1, 2024, the Park Fee shall be
adjusted annually commencing January 1, 2024, by the larger
increase of a) or b) as follows:
(a)The change in the CPI. The change shall be determined by using
the information provided by the U.S. Department of Labor,
Bureau of Labor Statistics, for all urban consumers within the Los
Angeles/Long Beach/Anaheim metropolitan area during the prior
year. The calculation shall be made using the month of October
over the prior October; or
(b)The calculation shall be made to reflect the chang e in the
Caltrans Highway Bid Price Index (Bid Price Index) for Selected
California Construction Items for the twelve (12) month period
available on December 31 of the preceding year (annual
indexing).
(c)In the event there is a decrease in both of the referenced Indices
for any annual indexing, the Park Fee shall remain at its then
current amount until such time as the next subsequent annual
indexing which results in an increase as of October of the next
year and each October thereafter.
(d)City and Developer agree that the above-described payments
shall be deemed to satisfy the parkland dedication requirement
set forth in California Government Code Section 66477 et seq.
for the Property.
Beltramo Ranch
Resolution No. PC-2022-672
Page 18
6.7 Community Services Fee. As a condition of issuance of a building
permit for each residential dwelling unit within the boundaries of the
Project, Developer shall pay City a one-time community services fee
as described herein (“Community Services Fee”). The Community
Services Fees may be expended by City in its sole and unfettered
discretion. The amount of the Community Services Fees shall be
three thousand, two hundred twenty-five dollars and nine cents
($3,225.09) per residential dwelling unit. Commencing on January
1, 2024, and annually thereafter, the Community Services Fee shall
be adjusted by any increase in the CPI until all Community Service
Fee have been paid. The CPI increase shall be determined by using
the information provided by the U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of
Labor Statistics, for All Urban Consumers within the Los
Angeles/Long Beach/Anaheim metropolitan area during this prior
year. The calculation shall be made using the month of October over
the prior month of October or in the event there is a decrease in the
CPI for any annual indexing, the Community Service Fee shall
remain at its then current amount until such time as the next
subsequent annual indexing which results in an increase.
6.8 Art in Public Places Fee. Developer agrees to pay the Art in Public
Places Fee (Art Fee) in effect at the time of building permit issuance
for each building prior to the issuance of the building permit for that
residential building within the Project consistent with City Resolution
No. 2005-2408 or any Successor Resolution (1.0 percent of total
building valuations excluding land value and off -site improvement
costs).
6.9 Other Development and Processing Fees. In addition to fees
specifically mentioned in this Agreement, Developer agrees to pay
all City capital improvement, development, and processing fees at
the rate and amount in effect at the time the fee is required to be
paid. Said fees include but are not limited to Library Facilities Fees,
Police Facilities Fees, Fire Facilities Fees, drainage, entitlement
processing fees, and plan check and permit fees for buildings and
public improvements. Developer further agrees that unless
specifically exempted by this Agreement, it is subject to all fee s
imposed by City at the Operative Date of this Agreement (“Existing
Fees”) any new City fees, exactions or charges or increases in
Existing Fees shall only be applicable to the Project if adopted in
compliance with the Mitigation Fee Act, Government Code Section
66000 et. seq. and are applied consistently and proportionately to
the Project.
Beltramo Ranch
Resolution No. PC-2022-672
Page 19
6.10 Processing Fees. On the Operative Date, Developer shall pay all
outstanding City processing costs related to preparation of this
Agreement, the Project Approvals and the MND.
6.11 Community Facilities District
(a)It is the mutual intent of the Parties that the development of the
Project will not have any fiscal impact on or require any contribution
from the General Fund of the City. Project funding for costs of the
development of the Project may include a mix of different
approaches, including without limitation, Developer construction of
and/or financing of such services, facilities, operations and
maintenance through the payment of Impact Fees or other fees,
taxes, levies, assessments, formation of and payment by a
homeowner’s association, or other financing mechanisms as
determined by Developer in its reasonable discretion, pursuant and
subject to this Agreement, the Project Approvals, Subsequent
Approvals and all Applicable City Law, taking into account and
guided by the pre-existing rights of others in the existing and future
public services and facilities (including their operations and
maintenance) that Developer may seek to use. To facilitate such
intent, as necessary, the Developer may request the City to form one
or more assessment or financing districts (“District(s)”), pursuant to
Chapter 2.5 of Part 1 of Division 2 of the California Government Code
(Government Code Sections 53311 et seq.) (the “CFD Act”), the
Streets and Highways Code, Division 10 and 12, the Landscape and
Lighting Act of 1972, or other similar law for the purposes of funding
services required to be provided or funded under this Agreement, as
Developer agrees to implement and the City determines are lawfully
and appropriately funded by the District. To the extent other property
owners outside the Property are interested or benefit and are made
part of such District, such other properties may be encompassed in
such District in accordance with applicable law.
(b)A District or other funding mechanism to the satisfaction of the City
Council and acceptable to Developer, shall be established to provide
funding for roadway, landscape, and hardscape maintenance
adjacent to Los Angeles Avenue. The Homeowners’ Association for
the Project shall be responsible for the maintenance of those areas
and facilities that exclusively benefit residents of the Project, which
shall exclude costs related to maintaining public dedicated
improvements in public areas within the project.
(c)In connection with the formation of a District, Developer shall: (i) file
with the City a petition for the formation of the District, (ii) provide any
deposit required by the applicable act, (iii) not oppose formation of
the District and (iv) vote in favor of the special tax or assessment, as
appropriate, to fund the District.
Beltramo Ranch
Resolution No. PC-2022-672
Page 20
(d)Developer acknowledges and agrees that the City will not accept any
improvements or facilities to be maintained by the District nor shall
the Developer receive any payments from the District for any
improvements or facilities until such facilities and improvements
have been inspected and the City determines, in its reasonable
discretion, that such improvements and facilities have been
completed in accordance with the applicable plans and have no liens
outstanding.
(e)The City and Developer agree that the assessments or special taxes
for any District formed will be collected from parcels in the District as
provided in the rate and method of apportionment (RMA) prepared
for that District.
(f)Upon written request of City, Developer will advance amounts
necessary to pay all costs and expenses of City to evaluate and
structure any District or other financing mechanism, to the end that
City will not be obligated to pay any costs related to the formation or
implementation of any District or other financing mechanism. City
staff shall meet with the Developer to establish a preliminary budget
for such costs, and will confer with Developer from time to time as to
any necessary modifications to that budget. Any District may provide
for the reimbursement to Developer of any advances by Developer
for any costs incurred as provided immediately above, and any other
costs incurred by Developer that are related to the District, such as
the costs of legal counsel, special tax consultants, engineers, etc. to
the extent authorized by the City and the applicable act.
6.12 Affordable Housing.
(a)The Developer agrees to pay an in lieu fee for the community
benefit of Affordable Housing (“Affordable Housing Fee”) prior
to the issuance of a building permit. The Affordable Housing
Fee may be expended by City in an effort to further fair
housing. The amount of the Affordable Housing Fee shall be
a flat fee of One Million Thirty-Four Thousand Dollars
($1,034,000.00). If the Affordable Housing Fee is unpaid as
of January 1, 2024, then on such date and annually thereafter,
the Affordable Housing Fee shall be adjusted by any increase
in the CPI until the Affordable Housing Fee has been paid.
The CPI increase shall be determined by using the
information provided by the U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau
of Labor Statistics, for All Urban Consumers within the Los
Angeles/Long Beach/Anaheim metropolitan area during the
prior year. The calculation shall be made using the month of
October over the month of October from the prior year or in
Beltramo Ranch
Resolution No. PC-2022-672
Page 21
the event there is a decrease in the CPI for any annual
indexing, the Affordable Housing Fee shall remain at its then
current amount until such time as the next subsequent annual
October indexing which results in an increase. By paying the
Affordable Housing Fee, the Developer shall have met its
Affordable Housing obligations.
6.13 Annual Review Procedures. Developer agrees to comply with
Section 15.40.150 of the Moorpark Municipal Code and any
provision amendatory or supplementary thereto for annual review of
this Agreement and further agrees that the annual review shall
include evaluation of its compliance with the approved MND and
MMRP.
6.14 Eminent Domain. Developer agrees that any election to acquire
property by eminent domain shall be at City’s sole discretion, and
only after compliance with all legally required procedures including
but not limited to a hearing on a proposed resolution of necessity.
6.16 Fee Protest Waiver. Developer agrees that any fees and payments
pursuant to this Agreement and for the Project shall be made without
reservation, and Developer expressly waives the right to payment of
any such fees under protest pursuant to California Government Code
Section 66020 and statutes amendatory or supplementary thereto.
Developer further agrees that the fees it has agreed to pay pursuant
to Subsections 6.2, 6.8 and 6.12 of this Agreement are not public
improvement fees collected pursuant to Government Code Section
66006 and statutes amendatory or supplementary thereto.
6.17 CPI Indexes. In the event the “CPI” referred to in Subsections 6.2,
6.5, 6.6, 6.7 and 6.12 or the Bid Price Index referred to in
Subsections 6.3 and 6.6 are discontinued or revised, a successor
index with which the “CPI” and or Bid Price Index are replaced shall
be used in order to obtain substantially the same result as would
otherwise have been obtained if either or both the “CPI” and Bid Price
Index had not been discontinued or revised.
6.18 City Ability to Modify. Developer acknowledges the City’s ability to
modify the development standards and to change the General Plan
designation and zoning of the Property upon the termination or
expiration of this Agreement (if the Project has not been built), and
Developer hereby waives any rights they might otherwise have to
seek judicial review of such City actions to change the development
standards, General Plan designation and zoning to those
development standards and density of permitted development to that
in existence prior to the approval of GPA No. 20 21-01 and ZCH No.
2021-01.
Beltramo Ranch
Resolution No. PC-2022-672
Page 22
6.19 Homeowners Association. Prior to recordation of the first final map
for the Property, if required by City at its sole discretion, Developer
shall form one or more property owner associations to assume
ownership and maintenance of private recreation, private streets,
parking areas, landscape areas, flood control and NPDES facilities
and other amenities within the Project. The obligation of said
Homeowners Associations shall be more specifically defined in the
conditions of approval of the first tentative tract for the property.
7.City Agreements.
7.1 Commitment of Resources. At Developer’s expense, City shall
commit reasonable time and resources of City staff to work with
Developer on the processing of applications for Project Approvals
and all Subsequent Approvals and Building Permits for the Project
area and if requested in writing by Developer shall use overtime and
independent contractors whenever possible.
7.2 Easement and Fee Title Acquisitions. If requested in writing by
Developer and limited to City’s legal authority, City at its sole and
absolute discretion shall proceed to acquire, at Developer’s sole cost
and expense, easements or fee title to land in which Developer does
not have title or interest in order to allow construction of public
improvements required of Developer including any land which is
outside City's legal boundaries and/or to relocate utilities on or
adjacent to the Project which are reasonably necessary to develop
the Property. The process shall generally follow Government Code
Section 66462.5 et seq. and shall include the obligation of Developer
to enter into an agreement with City, guaranteed by cash deposits
and other security as the City may require, to pay all City costs
including but not limited to, acquisition of the interest, attorney fees,
appraisal fees, engineering fees, City staff costs, and City overhead
expenses plus 15% on all out-of-pocket costs.
7.3 Concurrent Entitlement Processing. City agrees that whenever
possible as determined by City in its reasonable discretion to process
concurrently all land use entitlements for the Project so long as the
application for such entitlements are “deemed complete” in
compliance with the requirements of Chapter 4.5 Review and
approval of Development Projects (Permit Streamlining Act) of the
California Government Code.
Beltramo Ranch
Resolution No. PC-2022-672
Page 23
7.4 Park Fees. City agrees that the Park Fee required under Subsection
6.6 of this Agreement meets all of Developer's obligations under
applicable law for park land dedication.
7.5 Reimbursements from other Developments. City shall facilitate the
reimbursement to Developer of any costs incurred by Developer that
may be subject to partial reimbursement from other developers as a
condition of approval of a tract map, development permit or
development agreement with one or more other developers and at
City’s discretion may include provisions requiring such
reimbursement to Developer for the same in such other development
project conditions of approval.
7.6 Early Grading Agreement. The City Manager is authorized to sign
an early grading agreement on behalf of the City to allow rough
grading of the Project prior to City Council approval of a final
subdivision map. Said early grading agreement shall be consistent
with the conditions of the Project approved tentative map and
contingent on City Engineer and Director of Community
Development acceptance of a performance bond in a form and
amount satisfactory to them to guarantee implementation of the
erosion control plan and completion of the rough grading;
construction of on-site and off-site improvements consistent with the
City Council approved Project and Tentative Map. In the case of
failure to comply with the terms and conditions of the early grading
agreement, the City Council may by resolution declare the surety
forfeited.
8.Supersession of Agreement by Change of Law. In the event that any state
or federal law or regulation enacted after the date the Enabling Ordinance
was adopted by the City Council prevents or precludes compliance with any
provision of the Agreement, such provision shall be deemed modified or
suspended to comply with such state or federal law or regulation, as
reasonably determined necessary by City.
9.Demonstration of Good Faith Compliance. In order to ascertain compliance
by Developer with the provisions of this Agreement, the Agreement shall be
reviewed annually in accordance with Moorpark Municipal Code Chapter
15.40. of City or any successor thereof then in effect. The failure of City to
conduct any such annual review shall not, in any manner, constitute a
breach of this Agreement by City, diminish, impede, or abrogate the
obligations of Developer hereunder or render this Agreement invalid or void.
At the same time as the referenced annual review, City shall also review
Developer’s compliance with the MMRP.
10.Authorized Delays. Performance by any Party of its obligations hereunder,
other than payment of fees, shall be excused during any period of
Beltramo Ranch
Resolution No. PC-2022-672
Page 24
"Excusable Delay", as hereinafter defined, provided that the Party claiming
the delay gives written notice of the delay to the other Parties as soon as
possible after the same has been ascertained. For purposes hereof,
Excusable Delay shall mean delay that directly affects, is beyond the
reasonable control of, and is not the result of any negligence on the part of
the Party claiming the delay, including without limitation: (a) act of God; (b)
civil commotion; (c) riot; (d) strike, picketing or other labor dispute; (e)
shortage of materials or supplies; (f) damage to work in progress by reason
of fire, flood, earthquake or other casualty; (g) failure, delay or inability of
City or other local government entity to provide adequate levels of public
services, facilities or infrastructure to the Property including, by way of
example only, the lack of water to serve any portion of the Property due to
drought; (h) delay caused by a delay by other third party entities which are
required to approve plans or documents for Developer to construct the
Project, or restrictions imposed or mandated by such other third party
entities or governmental entities other than City, (including but not limited
to, Ventura County Watershed Protection District); or (i) litigation brought by
a third party attacking the validity of this Agreement, a Project Approval, a
Subsequent Approval or any other action necessary for development of the
Project.
11.Default Provisions.
11.1 Default by Developer. The Developer shall be deemed to have
breached this Agreement if it:
(a)Practices any fraud or deceit upon City; or willfully violates any
order, ruling or decision of any regulatory or judicial body having
jurisdiction over the Property or the Project, provided that
Developer may contest any such order, ruling or decision by
appropriate proceedings conducted in good faith, in which event
no breach of this Agreement shall be deemed to have occurred
unless and until there is a final adjudication adverse to Developer;
or
(b)fails to make any payments required under this Agreement within
fifteen (15) business days after City gives written notice to
Developer that the same is due and payable; or
(c)breaches any of the other provisions of this Agreement and fails
to cure the same within sixty (60) days after City gives written
notice to Developer of such breach (or, if the breach is not able to
be cured within such sixty (60) day period, Developer fails to start
to cure the same within sixty (60) days after delivery of written
notice by City of such breach or fails to thereafter diligently
prosecute the cure to completion).
Beltramo Ranch
Resolution No. PC-2022-672
Page 25
(d)Developer also agrees that subsidiaries, divisions or affiliates are
subject to the restrictions of this Agreement.
11.2 Default by City. City shall be in breach of this Agreement if it
breaches any of the provisions of this Agreement and fails to cure
the breach within sixty (60) days after Developer gives written notice
to City of the breach (or, if the breach is not able to be cured within
such sixty (60) day period, City fails to start to cure the same within
sixty (60) days after delivery of written notice from Developer of such
breach or fails to thereafter diligently prosecute the cure to
completion).
11.3 Content of Notice of Violation. Every notice of breach shall state with
specificity that it is given pursuant to this section of this Agreement,
the nature of the alleged breach, and the manner in which the breach
may be satisfactorily cured. Every notice shall state the applicable
period to cure. The notices shall be given in accordance with Section
20 hereof.
11.4 Remedies for Developer’s Failure to Cure Breach.
(a)If after the applicable cure period provided in Section 11.1 has
elapsed, the City Manager finds and determines the Developer,
or its successors, transferees and/or assignees, as the case may
be, remains in default and that the City shall terminate or modi fy
this Agreement, or those transferred or assigned rights and
obligations, as the case may be, Developer, and its successors,
transferees and/or assigns, shall be entitled to appeal that finding
and determination to the City Council in accordance with Section
14. Such right of appeal shall include, but not be limited to, an
objection to the manner in which the City intends to modify this
Agreement if the City intends as a result of a default of the
Developer, or one of its successors or assigns, to modify this
Agreement. In the event of a finding and determination that all
defaults are cured, there shall be no appeal by any person or
entity.
(b)Termination or Modification of Agreement. The City may
terminate or modify this Agreement, or those transferred or
assigned rights and obligations, as the case may be, after such
final determination of the City Council as provided in Subsection
11.4 (a) or, where no appeal is taken, after the expiration of the
applicable appeal periods described in Section 14
Notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement to the
contrary, in the event that: (a) Developer or any of its successors
assigns some, but not all, of its rights under this Agreement in
connection with a sale of some, but not all, of the Property; and
Beltramo Ranch
Resolution No. PC-2022-672
Page 26
(b) thereafter Developer or one or more of its successors in
interest under this Agreement is in default under this Agreement
and either Developer or one or more of its successors in interest
under this Agreement is not in default under this Agreement, then
any remedy the City may have the right to take under this
Agreement including the right of termination or modification of this
Agreement shall only apply to the party(ies) that is (are) in default
and the portion(s) of the Property owned by such party(ies) and
shall not apply to Developer or any successor and/or assignee of
Developer under this Agreement that is not in default hereunder.
11.5 Specific Performance. The Parties acknowledge that remedies at law,
including without limitation money damages, would be inadequate for
breach of this Agreement by any Party due to the size, nature and
scope of the Project. The Parties also acknowledge that it would not
be feasible or possible to restore the Property to its natural condition
once implementation of the Agreement has begun. The City's
remedy to terminate or amend this Agreement in the event of
Developer's uncured breach shall be sufficient in most
circumstances. Notwithstanding the foregoing, if the City approves
a final parcel map or subdivision map, issues a permit, or issues
other approval(s) pursuant to this Agreement in reliance upon a
specified condition or conditions being satisfied by Developer in the
future, and if Develop than fails to satisfy such condition(s), the City
shall be entitled to refuse to issue additional permits or approvals that
Developer would otherwise be entitled under this Agreement and
may seek specific performance for the sole purpose of causing
Developer to satisfy such condition or conditions. Except in these
limited circumstances, the City shall have no right to seek specific
performance to cause Developer to proceed with the development of
the Project in any manner.
Beltramo Ranch
Resolution No. PC-2022-672
Page 27
11.6 Monetary Damages. Developer and the City acknowledge that
neither the City nor Developer would have entered into this
Agreement if either were liable for monetary damages under or with
respect to this Agreement or the application thereof. Both the City
and Developer agree and recognize that, as a practical matter, it may
not be possible to determine an amount of monetary damages which
would adequately compensate Developer for its investment of time
and financial resources in planning to arrive at the kind, location,
intensity of use, and improvements for the Project, nor to calculate
the consideration the City would require to enter into this Agreement
to justify such exposure. Therefore, the City and Developer agree
that neither shall be liable for monetary damages under or with
respect to this Agreement or the application thereof and the City and
Developer covenant not to sue for or claim any monetary damages
for the breach of any provision of this Agreement. This foregoing
waiver shall not be deemed to apply to any fees or other monetary
amounts specifically required to be paid by Developer to the City
pursuant to this Agreement, including, but not limited to, any amounts
due pursuant to Section 6, 16 or Section 31. The foregoing waiver
shall also not be deemed to apply to any fees or other monetary
amounts specifically required to be paid or credited by the City to
Developer pursuant to this Agreement, including, but not limited to
any Fee Credits specifically required to be credited by City to
Developer or its assignee(s).
12.Mortgage Protection.
12.1 Discretion to Encumber. The Parties hereto agree that this
Agreement shall not prevent or limit Developer, in any manner, at
Developer’s sole discretion, from encumbering the Property or any
portion thereof or any improvements thereon then owned by such
person with any mortgage, deed of trust or other security device
(“Mortgage”) securing financing with respect to the Property or such
portion. Any mortgagee or trust deed beneficiary of the Property or
any portion thereof or any improvements thereon and its successors
and assigns (“Mortgagee”) shall be entitled to the following rights and
privileges.
12.2 Lender Requested Modification/Interpretation. City acknowledges
that the lenders providing financing to Developer for the Property
may request certain interpretations and modifications of this
Agreement. City therefore agrees upon request, from time to time,
to meet with Developer and representatives of such lenders to
discuss in good faith any such request for interpretation or
modification. The City will not unreasonably withhold its consent to
any such requested interpretation or modification provided such
Beltramo Ranch
Resolution No. PC-2022-672
Page 28
interpretation or modification is consistent with the intent and
purposes of this Agreement, provided, further, that any modifications
of this Agreement shall be subject to the provisions of this Agreement
pertaining to modifications and amendments.
12.3 Mortgage Protection. This Agreement shall be superior and senior
to the lien of any Mortgage. Notwithstanding the foregoing, no
breach of this Agreement shall defeat, render invalid, diminish or
impair the lien of any binding and effective Mortgagee and/or the
interest of every owner of the Property, or part thereof, whose title
thereto is acquired by foreclosure, trustee sale or otherwise;
provided, however, Mortgagee and such owner shall not be
responsible for any matters that occurred prior to their acquisition of
the Property or such portion.
12.4 Written Notice of Default. If a non-monetary default is not cured by
Developer within sixty (60) (days after written notice by City to
Developer or a monetary default is not cured within sixty (60) days
after written notice by City to Developer, then each Mortgagee shall
be entitled to receive written notice from City of the applicable default
by Developer under this Agreement provided the Mortgagee has
delivered a written request to the City for such notice and shall have
provided its address for notices in writing to the City. Each such
Mortgagee shall have a further right, but not the obligation, to cure
such default for an additional period of thirty (30) days after delivery
of such notice of default by City to the Mortgagee. City shall not
exercise any right or remedy granted under this Agreement against
Developer by reason of Developer’s breach without allowing the
Mortgagee to cure the same as specified herein.
13.Estoppel Certificate. At any time and from time to time, Developer may
deliver written notice to City and City may deliver written notice to Developer
requesting that such Party certify in writing that, to the knowledge of the
certifying Party, (i) this Agreement is in full force and effect and a binding
obligation of the Parties, (ii) this Agreement has not been amended, or if
amended, the identity of each amendment, and (iii) the requesting Party is
not in breach of this Agreement, or if in breach, a description of each such
breach. The Party receiving such a request shall execute and return the
certificate within ten (10) days following receipt of the notice. City
acknowledges that a certificate may be relied upon by successors in interest
to the Developer who requested the certificate and by holders of record of
deeds of trust on the portion of the Property in which that Developer has a
legal interest.
14.Administration of Agreement. Any consent or approval herein to be given
by the City may be given by the City Manager provided it is expressed and
Beltramo Ranch
Resolution No. PC-2022-672
Page 29
is in writing. Any decision by City staff concerning the interpretation and
administration of this Agreement and development of the Property in
accordance herewith may be appealed by the Developer to the City Council,
provided that any such appeal shall be filed with the City Clerk of City within
twenty (20) days after the affected Developer receives written notice of the
staff decision. The City Council shall render its decision to affirm, reverse
or modify the staff decision within thirty (30) days after the appeal was filed.
All City Council decisions or determinations regarding the Project or the
administration of this Agreement shall also be subject to judicial review
pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 1094.5, provided that, pursuant
to Code of Civil Procedure section 1094.6, any such action must be filed in
a court of competent jurisdiction not later than twenty (20) days after the
date on which the City Council's decision becomes final. The Developer
shall not seek judicial review of any staff decision without first having
exhausted its remedies pursuant to this section.
15.Amendment or Termination by Mutual Consent. In accordance with the
provisions of Chapter 15.40 of the Moorpark Municipal Code of City or any
successor thereof then in effect, this Agreement may be amended or
terminated, in whole or in part, by mutual consent of City and the affected
Developer.
15.1 Exemption for Amendments of Project Approvals. No amendment to
a Project Approval or Subsequent Approvals shall require an
amendment to this Agreement and any such amendment shall be
deemed to be incorporated into this Agreement at the time that the
amendment becomes effective, provided that the amendment is
consistent with this Agreement and does not alter the perm itted uses,
density, intensity, maximum height, size of buildings or reservations
and dedications as contained in the Project Approvals or Subsequent
Approvals.
16.Developer Indemnification. City and Developer agree to cooperate in
defending any legal action instituted by a third party or other government
entity or official challenging the validity of this Agreement . In the event of
any litigation challenging the effectiveness of this Agreement or any portion
thereof, this Agreement shall remain in full force and effect while such
litigation, including any appellate review, is pending, unless a court of
competent jurisdiction orders otherwise. Developer shall indemnify, defend
with counsel approved by City, and hold harmless City and its officers,
employees and agents from and against any and all losses, liabilities, fines,
penalties, costs, claims, demands, damages, injuries or judgments arising
out of, or resulting in any way from, Developer's performance pursuant to
this Agreement including, but not limited to, Developer’s construction of the
Project on the Property and any injury sustained by any person in
connection with the construction or partial construction of buildings and
improvements on the Property.
Beltramo Ranch
Resolution No. PC-2022-672
Page 30
Developer shall indemnify, defend with counsel approved by City, and hold
harmless City and its officers, employees and agents from and against any
action or proceeding to attack, review, set aside, void or annul this
Agreement, or any provision thereof, the environmental documents
prepared and approved in connection with the approval of the Project, or
any Project Approval or Subsequent Approval or modifications thereto, or
any other subsequent entitlements for the project and including any related
environmental approval.
17.Time of Essence. Time is of the essence for each provision of this
Agreement of which time is an element.
18.Operative Date. As described in Subsection 1.9 above, this Agreement
shall become operative on the Operative Date, being the date the Enabling
Ordinance becomes effective pursuant to Government Code Section
36937.
19.Term. This Agreement shall remain in full force and effect for a term of
twenty (20) years commencing on the Operative Date or until one year after
the issuance of the final building permit for occupancy of the last unit of the
Project whichever occurs last, unless said term is amended or the
Agreement is sooner terminated as otherwise provided herein. Expiration
of the term or earlier termination of this Agreement shall not automatically
affect any Project Approval or Subsequent Approval or building permit or
final building permit that has been granted or any right or obligation arising
independently from such Project Approval or Subsequent Approval or
building permit or final building permit.
Upon expiration of the term or earlier termination of this Agreement, this
Agreement shall have no further force and effect and the Parties shall
execute any document reasonably requested by any Party to remove this
Agreement from the public records as to the Property, and every portion
thereof, to the extent permitted by applicable laws.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, the following shall survive the expiration or
earlier termination of this Agreement: (i) all obligations arising under this
Agreement prior to the expiration or earlier termination of this Agreement
that expressly survive the termination of this Agreement; and (ii) Section 16
of this Agreement.
20.Notices. All notices and other communications given pursuant to this
Agreement shall be in writing and shall be deemed received when
personally delivered or upon the third (3rd) day after deposit in the United
States mail, registered or certified, postage prepaid, return receipt
requested, to the Parties at the addresses set forth in Exhibit “B” attached
hereto and incorporated herein.
Beltramo Ranch
Resolution No. PC-2022-672
Page 31
Any Party may, from time to time, by written notice to the other, designate
a different address which shall be substituted for the one above specified.
21.Entire Agreement. This Agreement and those exhibits and documents
referenced herein contain the entire agreement between the Parties
regarding the subject matter hereof, and all prior agreements or
understandings, oral or written, are hereby merged herein. This Agreement
shall not be amended, except as expressly provided herein.
22.Waiver. No waiver of any provision of this Agreement shall constitute a
waiver of any other provision, whether or not similar; nor shall any such
waiver constitute a continuing or subsequent waiver of the same provision.
No waiver shall be binding, unless it is executed in writing by a duly
authorized representative of the Party against whom enforcement of the
waiver is sought.
23.Severability. If any provision of this Agreement is determined by a court of
competent jurisdiction to be invalid or unenforceable, the remainder of this
Agreement shall be effective to the extent the remaining provisions are not
rendered impractical to perform, taking into consideration the purposes of
this Agreement.
24.Relationship of the Parties. Each Party acknowledges that, in entering into
and performing under this Agreement, it is acting as an independent entity
and not as an agent of any of the other Parties in any respect. Nothing
contained herein or in any document executed in connection herewith shall
be construed as creating the relationship of partners, joint ventures or any
other association of any kind or nature between City and Developer, jointly
or severally.
25.No Third Party Beneficiaries. This Agreement is made and entered into for
the sole benefit of the Parties and their successors in interest. No other
person shall have any right of action based upon any provision of this
Agreement.
26.Recordation of Agreement and Amendments. This Agreement and any
amendment thereof shall be recorded with the County Recorder of the
County of Ventura by the City Clerk of City within the period required by
Chapter 15.40 of the Moorpark Municipal Code of City or any successor
thereof then in effect.
27.Cooperation Between City and Developer. City and Developer shall execute
and deliver to the other all such other and further instruments and
documents as may be necessary to carry out the purposes of this
Agreement.
Beltramo Ranch
Resolution No. PC-2022-672
Page 32
28.Rules of Construction. The captions and headings of the various sections
and subsections of this Agreement are for convenience of reference only,
and they shall not constitute a part of this Agreement for any other purpose
or affect interpretation of the Agreement. Should any provision of this
Agreement be found to be in conflict with any provision of the Project
Approvals or the Subsequent Approvals, the provision of this Agreement
shall prevail.
29.Joint Preparation. This Agreement shall be deemed to have been prepared
jointly and equally by the Parties, and it shall not be construed against any
Party on the ground that the Party prepared the Agreement or caused it to
be prepared.
30.Governing Law and Venue; Institution of Legal Action. This Agreement is
made, entered into, and executed in the County of Ventur a, California, and
the laws of the State of California shall govern its interpretation and
enforcement. Any action, suit or proceeding related to, or arising from, this
Agreement shall be filed in the appropriate court having jurisdiction in the
County of Ventura, State of California or in the United States District Court
for the Central District of California.
31.Attorneys' Fees. In the event any action, suit or proceeding is brought for
the enforcement or declaration of any right or obligation pursua nt to, or as
a result of any alleged breach of, this Agreement, the prevailing Party shall
be entitled to its reasonable attorneys' fees and litigation expenses and
costs, and any judgment, order or decree rendered in such action, suit or
proceeding shall include an award thereof.
32.Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in multiple counterparts,
each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which constitute one
and the same instrument.
33.Authority to Execute. Developer warrants and represents that to its
knowledge as of the Operative Date and with respect to each entity that is
defined as Developer: (i) it is duly organized and existing; (ii) it is duly
authorized to execute and deliver this Agreement; (iii) by so executing this
Agreement, Developer is formally bound to the provisions of this
Agreement; (iv) Developer’s entering into and performance of its obligations
set forth in this Agreement do not violate any provision of any other
agreement to which Developer is bound; and (v) the re is no existing or
threatened litigation or legal proceeding of which Developer is aware that
could prevent Developer from entering into or performing its obligations set
forth in this Agreement.
Beltramo Ranch
Resolution No. PC-2022-672
Page 33
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have executed this Development
Agreement effective as of the Operative Date.
CITY OF MOORPARK
Janice S. Parvin, Mayor
ATTEST:
Ky Spangler, City Clerk
WARMINGTON RESIDENTIAL CALIFORNIA, INC., a California corporation
By:
Name:
Title:
Beltramo Ranch
Resolution No. PC-2022-672
Page 34
EXHIBIT “A”
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
Beltramo Ranch
Resolution No. PC-2022-672
Page 35
EXHIBIT “B”
ADDRESSES OF PARTIES
To City:
City of Moorpark
799 Moorpark Avenue
Moorpark, CA 93021
Attn: City Manager
To Developer:
Warmington Residential California, Inc.,
3090 Pullman Street
Costa Mesa, California 92626
Attention: Matt Tingler, Joe Oftelie and Joel Kew
Telephone: (714) 434-4324
Email: mtingler@warmingtongroup.com, joftelie@warmingtongroup.com,
jkew@warmingtongroup.com
With a copy to:
Ross, Wolcott, Teinert & Prout LLP
3151 Airway Avenue, Building S-1
Costa Mesa, California 92626
Attention: Cynthia M. Wolcott and Elizabeth T. Hall
Telephone: (714) 444-3900
email: cwolcott@rossllp.com and ehall@rossllp.com
Beltramo Ranch
Resolution No. PC-2022-672
Page 36
EXHIBIT “C”
PROJECT SITE PLAN
Beltramo Ranch
Resolution No. PC-2022-672
Page 37
1)Within thirty (30) calendar days of approval of this entitlement, the applicant shall sign
and return to the Planning Division an Affidavit of Agreement and Notice of Entitlement
Permit Conditions of Approval, indicating that the applicant has read and agrees to
meet all Conditions of Approval of this entitlement. The Affidavit of Agreement/Notice
shall include a legal description of the subject property and have the appropriate
notary acknowledgement suitable for recordation. [CDD]
1 Expiration not applicable to legislative actions including General Plan Amendment and Zone Change
which become effective upon project approval.
CITY OF MOORPARK CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Project Approval Date: ____________, 202X
Entitlement Expiration Date: ___________, 202X1
Location: 11930 Los Angeles Avenue (Assessor’s Parcel Numbers [APNs] 504 -0-021-
195, 506-0-030-210, 506-0-030-220, 506-0-030-235, 506-0-030-045, and 506-0-030-055
Entitlements: General Plan Amendment (GPA) No. 2021-01, Development Agreement
(DA) No. 2021-01, Zone Change (ZCH) 2021-01, Vesting Tentative Tract Map (VTTM)
No. 2021-01 (VTTM 6061), and Residential Planned Development (RPD) No. 2021-01
Project Description: The Project proposes the subdivision of land and development of
47 residential units, private roads and community open space, and associated
improvements on 7.4 acres. The Project includes a General Plan Amendment land use
designation change from Park (P) and Low Density Residential (L) to High Density
Residential and a a Zone Change from Single Family Residential (R-1) and Rural
Exclusive (RE-20) to Residential Planned Development (RPD-7U).
The applicant/permittee is responsible for the fulfillment of all conditions and
standard development requirements, unless specifically stated otherwise.
General Conditions
In addition to complying with all applicable City, County, State and Federal Statutes,
Codes, Ordinances, Resolutions and Regulations, Development Agreements, Permittee
expressly accepts and agrees to comply with the following Conditions of Approval and
Standard Development Requirements of this Permit:
EXHIBIT C
Beltramo Ranch
Resolution No. PC-2022-672
Page 38
2) This Vesting Tentative Tract Map (VTTM) No. 2021-01 (VTTM 6061), and Residential
Planned Development (RPD) No. 2021-01 permit expires two (2) years from the date
of its approval unless the use has been inaugurated by issuance of a building permit
for construction. The Community Development Director may, at his/her discretion,
grant up to two (2) additional one-year extensions for use inauguration of the
development permit if there have been no changes in the adjacent areas and if the
applicant can document that he/she has diligently worked towards use inaugur ation
during the initial period of time. The City Council he Community Development Director
may, at his/her discretion, grant up to two (2) additional one -year extensions for use
inauguration of the development permit if there have been no changes in the adjacent
areas and if the applicant can document that he/she has diligently worked towards
use inauguration during the initial period of time, not to exceed a total of six years.
The request for extension of this planned development permit must be made in writing,
at least thirty (30) days prior to the expiration date of the permit and must be
accompanied by applicable entitlement processing deposits. [CDD]
3) The Conditions of Approval of this entitlement and all provisions of the Subdivision
Map Act, City of Moorpark Municipal Code and adopted City policies at the time of the
entitlement approval, supersede all conflicting notations, specifications, dimensions,
typical sections and the like which may be shown on said Map and/or plans or on the
entitlement application. This language shall be added as a notation to the Final Map
and/or to the final plans for the planned development. [CDD]
4) Conditions of this entitlement may not be interpreted as permitting or requiring any
violation of law or any unlawful rules or regulations or orders of an authorized
governmental agency. [CDD]
5) Should continued compliance with these Conditions of Approval not be met, the
Community Development Director may modify the conditions in accordance with
Municipal Code Section 17.44.100 and sections amendatory or supplementary
thereto, declare the project to be out of compliance, or the Director may declare, for
some other just cause, the project to be a public nuisance. The applicant shall be
liable to the City for any and all costs and expenses to the City involved in thereafter
abating the nuisance and in obtaining compliance with the Conditions of Approval or
applicable codes. If the applicant fails to pay all City costs related to this action, the
City may enact special assessment proceedings against the parcel of land upon which
the nuisance existed (Municipal Code Section 1.12.170). [CDD]
6) The applicant shall defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City and its agents,
officers and employees from any claim, action or proceeding against the City or its
agents, officers or employees to attack, set aside, void, or annul any approval by the
City or any of its agencies, departments, commissions, agents, officers, or employees
concerning this entitlement approval, which claim, action or proceeding is brought
within the time period provided therefore in Government Code Section 66499.37 or
other sections of state law as applicable and any provision amendatory or
supplementary thereto. The City will promptly notify the applicant of any such claim,
Beltramo Ranch
Resolution No. PC-2022-672
Page 39
action or proceeding, and, if the City should fail to do so or should fail to cooperate
fully in the defense, the applicant shall not thereafter be responsible to defend,
indemnify and hold harmless the City or its agents, officers and employees pursuant
to this condition. a. The City may, within its unlimited discretion, participate in the
defense of any such claim, action or proceeding if both of the following occur: i. The
City bears its own attorney fees and costs; ii. The City defends the claim, action or
proceeding in good faith. b. The applicant shall not be required to pay or perform any
settlement of such claim, action or proceeding unless the settlement is approved by
the applicant. The applicant's obligations under this condition shall apply regardless
of whether a Final Map is ultimately recorded with respect to the subdivision or a
building permit is issued pursuant to the planned development permit. [CDD]
7) If any of the conditions or limitations of this approval are held to be invalid, that holding
does not invalidate any of the remaining conditions or limitations set forth. [CDD]
8) All facilities and uses, other than those specifically requested in the application and
approval and those accessory uses allowed by the Municipal Code, are prohibited
unless otherwise permitted through application for Modification consistent with the
requirements of the zone and any other adopted ordinances, specific plans, landscape
guidelines, or design guidelines. [CDD]
9) Entitlement Processing: Prior to the approval of any Zoning Clearance for this
entitlement the applicant shall submit to the Community Development Department all
outstanding entitlement case processing fees, including all applicable City legal
service fees. This payment must be made within sixty (60) calendar days after the
approval of this entitlement. [CDD]
10) Condition Compliance: Prior to the issuance of any Zoning Clearance, building permit,
grading permit, or advanced grading permit, the applicant shall submit to the
Community Development Department the Condition Compliance review deposit.
[CDD]
11) Any expansion, alteration or change in architectural elements requires prior approval
of the Community Development Director. Those changes in architectural elements
that the Director determines would visible from abutting street(s) may only be allowed,
if, in the judgment of the Community Development Director such change is compatible
with the surrounding area. Any approval granted by the Director must be consistent
with the approved Design Guidelines (if any) for the planned development and
applicable Zoning Code requirements. A Permit Modification application may be
required as determined by the Community Development Director. [CDD]
12) The applicant agrees not to protest the formation of an underground Utility
Assessment District. [CDD & PW]
13) The Project shall underground all onsite utility poles and lines. [CDD]
Beltramo Ranch
Resolution No. PC-2022-672
Page 40
14) Prior to issuance of a Zoning Clearance for the construction of residential units, t he
Project plans shall incorporate six-foot-tall masonry walls with caps along the rear
property lines and street side yard lines of all residential lots. Vinyl fencing is
acceptable along interior side yards. [CDD]
15) The continued maintenance of the subject site and facilities is subject to periodic
inspection by the City. The Applicant and his/her successors, heirs, and assigns are
required to remedy any defects in ground or building maintenance, as indicated by the
City within five (5) working days from written notification. [CDD]
16) No noxious odors may be generated from any use on the subject site. [CDD]
17) The applicant and his/her successors, heirs, and assigns must remove any graffiti
within five (five) days from written notification by the City of Moorpark. All such graffiti
removal must be accomplished to the satisfaction of the Community Development
Director. [CDD]
18) If any hazardous waste or material is encountered during the construction of this
project, all work must be immediately stopped and the Ventura County Environmental
Health Department, the Ventura County Fire Protection District, the Moorpark Police
Department, and the Moorpark City Engineer and Public Works Director must be
notified immediately. Work may not proceed until clearance has been issued by all of
these agencies. [CDD, VCFPD, MPD, VCEHD & PW]
Development Fees
19) Capital Improvements and Facilities, and Processing: Prior to the issuance of any
Zoning Clearance, the applicant shall submit to the Community Development
Department, capital improvement, development, and processing fees at the current
rate then in effect. Said fees include, but are not limited to, building and public
improvement plan checks and permits. Unless specifically exempted by City Council,
the applicant is subject to all fees imposed by the City as of the issuance of the first
permit for construction and such future fees imposed as determined by City in its sole
discretion so long as said fee is imposed on similarly situated properties. Fees
typically adjust annually. Fees may be set to adjust at a different interval as noted in
the Development Agreement.
Affordable Housing Requirement
20) Prior to the issuance of any building permit, the developer shall pay an affordable
housing in lieu fee, as outlined in the Development Agreement. [CDD]
Site Improvements
21) Mechanical equipment for the operation of the building must be g round-mounted and
screened to the satisfaction of the Community Development Director. The Community
Development Director may approve roof-mounted equipment, in which case, all parts
of the roof mounted equipment (such as vents, stacks, blowers, air condit ioning
Beltramo Ranch
Resolution No. PC-2022-672
Page 41
equipment, etc.) must be below the lowest parapet on the roof; and must be painted
the same color as the roofing material. No piping, roof ladders, vents, exterior drains
and scuppers or any other exposed equipment may be visible on the roof. [CDD]
22) Parking areas must be developed and maintained in accordance with the
requirements of the Moorpark Municipal Code. All parking space and loading bay
striping must be maintained so that it remains clearly visible during the life of the
development. [CDD]
23) Prior to any re-striping of the parking area, a Zoning Clearance is required. All disabled
parking spaces and paths of travel must be re-striped and maintained in their original
approved locations unless new locations are approved by the Community
Development Director. [CDD]
24) All parking areas must be surfaced with asphalt, concrete, or other surface acceptable
to the Community Development Director, City Engineer and Public Works Director,
and must include adequate provisions for drainage, National Pollu tion Discharge
Elimination System (NPDES) compliance, striping and appropriate wheel blocks,
curbs, or posts in parking areas adjacent to landscaped areas. All parking, loading
and common areas must be maintained at all times to ensure safe access and use by
employees, public agencies and service vehicles. [CDD & PW]
25) The Permittee is encouraged to install fiber-optic conduit from the proposed
buildings to the right-of-way during grading to maximize the utility and futureproofing
of the project. [EDD]
26) The Building Plans must be in substantial conformance to the plans approved under
this entitlement and must specifically include the following:
a. Transformers, backflow prevention devices, fire department apparatus, and cross
connection water control devices (subject to approval by Ventura County
Waterworks District No. 1), screened from street view with a masonry wall and/or
landscaping as determined by the Community Development Director.
b. Final exterior building materials and paint colors consistent with the approved
plans under this permit. Any changes to the building materials and paint colors
are subject to the review and approval of the Community Development Director.
c. Identification of coating or rust-inhibitive paint for all exterior metal building
surfaces to prevent corrosion and release of metal contaminants into the storm
drain system.
d. Trash disposal and recycling areas in locations which will not interfere with
circulation, parking or access to the building. Exterior trash areas and recycling
bins must use impermeable pavement and be designed to have a cover and so
that no other area drains into it. The trash areas and recycling bins must be
Beltramo Ranch
Resolution No. PC-2022-672
Page 42
depicted on the final construction plans, the size of which must be approved by
the Community Development Director, City Engineer and Public Works Director
and the City's Solid Waste Management staff. When deemed appropriate, drains
from the disposal and recycling areas must be connected to the sewer system
and subject to the approval of Ventura County Waterworks District No. 1. Review
and approval shall be accomplished prior to the issuance of a Zoning Clearance
for building permit. [CDD]
Landscaping, Lighting And Maintenance Requirements
27) Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit to t he Community
Development Director for review and approval, with the required deposit, three full
sets of Landscaping and Irrigation Plans prepared by a licensed landscape architect
and drawn on a plan that reflects final grading configuration, in conformit y with the
City of Moorpark Landscape Standards and Guidelines, policies and requirements.
[CDD]
28) Prior to or concurrently with the submittal of the landscape and irrigation plan, a
lighting plan, along with required deposit, must be submitted to the Community
Development Director for review and approval. The lighting plan, prepared by an
electrical engineer registered in the State of California, must be in conformance with
the Moorpark Municipal Code. [CDD]
29) Prior to issuance of grading permit, applicant shall provide an Irrevocable Offer of
Dedication to the City of an easement for the purposes of providing public access.
This easement shall consist of the park area of the site. All required easements
must be clearly shown on the final site plan(s) and recorded on the Final Map. If no
Final Map is provided, then the easement must be on other recorded documents.
Additional pertinent documents may be required by the Community Development
Director, City Engineer, Public Works Director, and the City Attorney. [CDD, PW &
CA]
30) Prior to or concurrently with the issuance of a Zoning Clearance, applicant shall
provide affirmative votes to establish a Community Facilities District (CFD) for the
continued maintenance of the landscaping along the West Los Ang eles Avenue
frontage area. Once the CFD has been established, the CFD area will be reviewed
by the City to determine if the formation of additional easements will be required
along the frontage. Any landscaping outside of the right -of-way must be within the
CFD or an easement. [CDD]
31) Prior to issuance of grading permit, applicant must provide an arborist report with
tree valuation for all trees that are proposed to be removed , which was provided
during the review of the entitlement. Applicant must use the resulting value of the
removed trees to provide and install enhanced landscaping equal to the value of
the trees removed. This valuation is subject to review by the Parks and Recreation
Director to determine if the proposed enhanced landscaping satisfies the
requirement. Applicant shall provide supporting documentation and valuation
Beltramo Ranch
Resolution No. PC-2022-672
Page 43
calculations describing how the valuation of the proposed enhanced landscape was
assessed. This requirement does not apply to the trees within the designed park
area, where tree valuations were waived as a result of substantial replacement with
native and noninvasive tree species within the Project – this exception is contingent
upon the applicant providing trees for the Site in substantial conformance with those
shown in the conceptual landscape plans. Waiver of such tree valuation was
acceptable to the Community Development Director, provided that such enhanced
tree planting consists of Coast live oak trees, California sycamore and other tree
plantings in 24-inch minimum sized boxes. Tree placement and numbers should
meet or exceed those shown on the conceptual landscape plan included as part of
this entitlement. Enhanced landscaping must be installed in accordance with
current applicable provisions of the Moorpark Municipal Co de prior to issuance of
final Certificate of Occupancy. [CDD]
32) Prior to or concurrently with the issuance of a Zoning Clearance, applicant shall pay
a fee equal to the appraised value of the waterline easement over portion of
Glenwood Park. Applicant to provide appraisal paperwork for review by the
Community Development Director and Public Works Director. [CDD, PW & CA]
33) Landscape plans submitted at the time of entitlement review are conceptual only.
Entitlement approval does not include approval of specific plant species on
conceptual landscape plans unless specifically indicated in the Special Conditions
of approval. Detailed landscape plans are subject to review by the Community
Development Director for compliance with the City’s Landscape Standards and
Guidelines. Avoid plants that require cutting back to keep them within a specified
area or at a trimmed height – provide space for plants to grow to maturity and keep
their natural shape. [CDD]
34) For project sites adjacent to protected open space or to a conservation area, none
of the prohibited plants indicated in the Invasive and Prohibited Plant List contained
in the City’s Landscape Standards and Guidelines may be used on any property
within the development site or private right of way. [CDD]
35) When available and feasible, use of reclaimed water is required – subject to
approval by the Community Development Director, the City Engineer, Public Works
Director and Ventura County Environmental Health Division. [CDD, PW & VCEHD]
36) Prior to issuance of Zoning Clearance for occupancy, all fences and walls along lot
boundaries must be in place, unless an alternative schedule is approved by the
Community Development Director. [CDD]
37) All landscaping must be maintained in a healthy and thriving condition, free of
weeds, litter, and debris. All paved surfaces: including, but not limited to, the parking
area and aisles, drive-through lanes, on-site walkways must be maintained free of
litter, debris, and dirt. Walkways, parking areas and aisles and drive -through lanes
must be swept, washed, or vacuumed regularly. When swept or washed, litter,
Beltramo Ranch
Resolution No. PC-2022-672
Page 44
debris and dirt must be trapped and collected to prevent entry to the storm drain
system in accordance with NPDES requirements. [CDD & PW]
Solid Waste Division
38) Any park or common area shall include both recycling and waste receptacles of at
least 35 gallon capacity. Recycling bins must be labeled with "Recycling Only"
language and the material deposited in such bins must be disposed of in a manner
consistent with State Law. [SWM]
39) Prior to issuance of Zoning Clearance for occupancy, the applicant shall provide
proof of taking an on-site waste management education program to the satisfaction
of the City's Solid Waste Management staff. [SWM]
40) Prior to issuance of a zoning clearance for a building permit, the applicant shall
provide a Trash Fence Plan for the review and approval of the City's Solid Waste
Management staff and Community Development Director. The Plan shall provide a
gate with a minimum width of thirty-six inches (36") to accommodate trash and
recycling containers, as well as a 36-inch wide concrete walk to provide access to
the driveway. [SWM]
41) Prior to issuance of a construction permit, the applicant shall provide a Recycling
Bin Plan for the review and approval of the City's Solid Waste Management staff.
Bins must be labeled with "Recycling Only" and bins containing mixed material must
be sent to a State-approved recycling center or transfer station where the material
is to be sorted for proper recycling. Applicant will also be required to divert 65% of
all nonhazardous construction materials from landfill. [SWM]
42) Prior to issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall submit a Construction and
Demolition Materials Management Plan Estimate for the review and approval of the
City's Solid Waste Management staff and Building and Safety Division for recycling
of waste materials consistent with the aforementioned requirement. The Plan must
include estimated quantities for each type of material to be diverted or landfilled.
[SWM]
43) Prior to final inspection, the applicant must submit a Final Report Construction and
Demolition Waste Letter of Documentation (including premium gate tickets) to the
Building and Safety Division, demonstrating compliance with the Construc tion and
Demolition Materials Management Plan Estimate and indicate the total amount of
construction and demolition waste diverted. [SWM]
Engineering Division
44) Prior to construction, applicant shall submit a construction traffic control plan for the
review and approval of the City Engineer and Public Works Director. Traffic control
plan shall include construction advisory speed limits, speed limit posting locations, and
enforcement measures if needed. [PW]
Beltramo Ranch
Resolution No. PC-2022-672
Page 45
45) The applicant and/or property owner shall provide verification to the City Engineer and
Public Works Director that all on-site storm drains have been cleaned at least twice a
year, once immediately prior to October 1st (the rainy season) and once in January.
Additional cleaning may be required by the City Engineer and Public Works Director
depending upon site and weather conditions. [PW]
46) Prior to any work being conducted within any State, County, or City right -of- way, the
applicant shall obtain all necessary encroachment permits from the appropriate
agencies and provide copies of these approved permits and the plans associated with
the permits to the City Engineer and Public Works Director. [PW]
47) Reactive organic compounds, Nitrogen oxides (ozone/smog precursor), and
particulate matter (aerosols/dust) generated during construction operations must be
minimized in accordance with the City of Moorpark standards and the standards of the
Ventura County Air Pollution Control District (APCD). When an air pollution Health
Advisory has been issued, construction equipment operations (including but not
limited to grading, excavating, earthmoving, trenching, material hauling, and roadway
construction) and related activities must cease in order to minimize associated air
pollutant emissions. [PW & VCAPCD]
48) The applicant shall utilize all prudent and reasonable measures (including installation
of a 6-foot-high chain link fence around the construction site(s) and/or provision of a
full time licensed security guard) to prevent unauthorized persons from entering the
work site at any time and to protect the public from accidents and injury. [PW]
49) Prior to construction, the applicant shall post, in a conspicuous location, the
construction hour limitations and make each construction trade aware of the
construction hour limitations to the satisfaction of the City. [CDD & PW]
50) Prior to the issuance of a grading permit or Final Map approval, whichever comes first,
the applicant shall post sufficient surety with the City, in a form acceptable to the City
Engineer and Public Works Director, guaranteeing completion of all onsite and offsite
improvements required by these Conditions of Approval and/or the Municipal Code
including, but not limited to grading, street improvements, storm drain improvements,
temporary and permanent Best Management Practice (BMP) for the control of non -
point water discharges, landscaping, fencing, and bridges. Grading and improvements
must be designed, bonded, and constructed as a single project. [PW]
51) Prior to the issuance of a grading permit or Final Map approval, whichever occurs first,
the applicant shall provide written proof to the City Engineer and Public Works Director
that any and all wells that may exist or have existed within the project have been
properly sealed, destroyed or abandoned per Ventura County Ordinance No. 2372 or
Ordinance No. 3991 and per California Department of Conservation, Division of Oil,
Gas, and Geothermal Resources requirements. [PW]
Beltramo Ranch
Resolution No. PC-2022-672
Page 46
52) During grading, the project geotechnical engineer shall observe and approve all
keyway excavations, removal of fill and landslide materials down to stable bedrock or
in-place material, and installation of all sub-drains including their connections. All fill
slope construction must be observed and tested by the project geotechnical engineer,
and the density test results and reports submitted to the City Engineer and Public
Works Director to be kept on file. Cuts and slopes must be observed and mapped by
the project geotechnical and civil engineers who will provide any required slope
modification recommendations based on the actual geologic conditions encountered
during grading. Written approval from the City Engineer and Public Works Director
must be obtained prior to any modification. [PW]
53) Written weekly progress reports and a grading completion report must be submitted
to the City Engineer and Public Works Director by the project geotechnical engineers.
These reports must include the results and locations of all compaction tests, as -built
plans of all landslide repairs and fill removal, including geologic mapping of the
exposed geology of all excavations showing cut cross-sections and sub-drain depths
and locations. The lists of excavations approved by the engineering geologist must
also be submitted. Building permits will not be issued without documentation that the
grading and other pertinent work has been performed in accordance with the
geotechnical report criteria and applicable Grading Ordinance provisions. [PW]
54) During grading, colluvial soils and landslide deposits within developed portions of the
properties must be re-graded to effectively remove the potential for seismically-
induced landslides in these materials. Additional buttressing, keying and installation
of debris benches must be provided in transition areas between non-graded areas
and development as recommended in the final geotechnical reports by the project
geotechnical engineer. [PW]
55) Temporary irrigation, hydroseeding and erosion control measures, approved by the
Community Development Director, City Engineer and Public Works Director, must be
implemented on all temporary grading. Temporary grading is defined to be any
grading partially completed and any disturbance of existing natural conditions due to
construction activity. These measures will apply to a temporary or permanent grading
activity that remains or is anticipated to remain unfinished or undisturbed in its altered
condition for a period of time greater than thirty (30) calendar days except that during
the rainy season (October 1 to April 15), these measures will be implemented
immediately. [CDD & PW]
56) Grading may occur during the rainy season from October 1 to April 15, subject to
timely installation of erosion control facilities when approved in writing by the City
Engineer, Public Works Director and the Community Development Director and when
erosion control measures are in place. In order to start or continue grading operations
between October 1 and April 15, project-specific erosion control plans that provide
detailed Best Management Practices for erosion control during the rainy season must
be submitted to the City Engineer and Public Works Director no later than September
1 of each year that grading is in progress. During site preparation and construc tion,
Beltramo Ranch
Resolution No. PC-2022-672
Page 47
the contractor shall minimize disturbance of natural groundcover on the project site
until such activity is required for grading and construction purposes. During the rainy
season, October 1 through April 15, all graded slopes must be covered with a woven
artificial covering immediately after completion of each graded slope. Grading
operations must cease if the applicant fails to place effective best management
measures on graded slopes immediately after construction. No slopes may be graded
or otherwise created when the National Weather Service local three-day forecast for
rain is twenty percent (20%), or greater, unless the applicant is prepared to cover the
permanent and temporary slopes before the rain event. The artificial covering and
planting will be to the satisfaction of the Community Development Director, City
Engineer, and Public Works Director. [CDD & PW]
57) Prior to construction, the applicant shall comply with the City of Moorpark standard
requirements for dust control, including, but not be limited to, minimization of ground
disturbance, application of water/chemicals, temporary/permanent ground
cover/seeding, street sweeping, and covering loads of dirt for the review and approval
of the City Engineer and Public Works Director. All clearing, grading, earth moving,
excavation, soil import and/or soil export operations must cease during periods of high
winds (greater than 15 mph averaged over one hour). [PW]
58) At least one (1) week prior to commencement of grading or construction, the applica nt
shall prepare a notice that grading or construction work will commence. This notice
shall be posted at the site and mailed to all owners and occupants of property within
five-hundred feet (500') of the exterior boundary of the project site, as shown on the
latest equalized assessment roll. The notice must include current contact information
for the applicant, including all persons with authority to indicate and implement
corrective action in their area of responsibility, including the name of the contact
responsible for maintaining the list. The names of individuals responsible for noise
and litter control, tree protection, construction traffic and vehicles, erosion control, and
the twenty-four (24) hour emergency number, must be expressly identified in the
notice. The notice must be re-issued with each phase of major grading and
construction activity. A copy of all notices must be concurrently transmitted to the
Community Development Department. The notice record for the City must be
accompanied by a list of the names and addresses of the property owners notified
and a map identifying the notification area. [CDD & PW]
59) Applicant has full right to exercise the service of a new engineer in charge at any time
during a project. When there is a change in engineer, the applicant/owner shall notify
the City Engineer and Public Works Director in writing within 48 hours of such change.
Said letter shall specify successor California Registered Civil Engineer and shall be
stamped and signed and dated by said engineer in responsible charge and shall
accept responsibility of project. The letter will be kept on file at the City. [PW]
60) Prior to construction, applicant shall obtain an Encroachment Permit from Caltrans
District 7 Office of Permits for all construction related activities on Los Angeles Avenue
(State Highway 118). This includes, but is not limited to, construction traffic control
Beltramo Ranch
Resolution No. PC-2022-672
Page 48
plan and phasing, detours, temporary construction improvements such as stabilized
entrances, and placement of stormwater BMPs. [PW]
61) Prior to issuance of a Grading Permit, applicant shall obtain approval from Caltrans
District 7 Office of Permits for any public and street improvements on Los Angeles
Avenue (State Highway 118). Public improvements may include, but not be limited
to, utility improvements, drainage infrastructure improvements, sanitary sewer and
domestic water improvements, and signing and striping improvements. [PW]
62) Prior to Grading Permit issuance, all domestic water and sanitary sewer improvements
shall be reviewed and approved by Ventura County Waterworks District No. 1. [PW]
63) Prior to any Grading Permit issuance, the applicant shall obtain approval and/or
permit, if applicable, from Ventura County Watershed Protection District for any storm
water connection(s) and discharges into the Arroyo Simi Channel. [PW]
64) All private driveway intersections within the development shall provide adequate sight-
distance for all approaches for all users, including pedestrians and cyclists. Sight -
distance analysis shall be provided to the City Engineering Division for review and
acceptance. [PW]
65) Prior to Grading Permit issuance, site access and fire hydrant locations shall be
reviewed and approved by the Ventura County Fire Department. [PW]
66) Prior to Building Permit issuance, any existing sub-surface septic systems shall be
removed. [PW]
67) The applicant shall submit Precise Grading Plans, prepared by a California Registered
Civil Engineer, detailing the design of finished surfaces including parking lot
pavement, curbs, curb and gutter, local depressions, sidewalks disabled access
parking, ramps, connections to public right of way and disabled access circulation
within the site. The plans should include design grades for proposed buildings,
including pad and finished floor elevations, required over-excavations cut/fill slopes,
keyways, subdrains, limits and details of any required remedial grading. Required
retaining walls shall be detailed with top of wall/top of footing callouts every 25 to 50
feet, related finished grades at the top of walls, and details of provisions for subdrains
and connections to approved points of disposal. Precise Grading Plans shall be
submitted to the City of Moorpark Public Works Department for review and approval
prior to the issuance of a Grading Permit. [PW]
68) The applicant shall submit a design level Geotechnical Report prepared by a
Geotechnical Engineer and Engineering Geologist. The Geotechnical Report shall
provide specific recommendations for cut/fill slopes, foundations, retaining wa lls,
temporary excavations, utility trenches, by the proposed development. The report
shall present detailed geotechnical recommendations for design and construction of
the proposed project and improvements, as well as mitigation of known geologic
Beltramo Ranch
Resolution No. PC-2022-672
Page 49
hazards. The Geotechnical Report shall be prepared in accordance with the County
of Ventura standards and shall be submitted to the City of Moorpark Public Works
Department for review and approval prior to the issuance of a Grading Permit. [PW]
69) All pavement structural sections shall be designed by the project Geotechnical
Engineer and Engineering Geologist and submitted in conjunction with the final
geotechnical report for review and approval by the City of Moorpark Public Works
Department prior to the issuance of a Grading Permit. [PW]
70) All slopes shall be 2:1 (horizontal to vertical) or less in accordance with the approved
geotechnical studies. [PW]
71) The applicant shall provide for the mitigation of the potential for liquefaction and lateral
spreading, and well as the densifying of soils underlying and providing support for the
proposed buildings based on the recommendations in the project Geotechnical
Report. The applicant will provide for a specific design and method of ground
improvement to satisfy the above requirements. Ground improvement design and
liquefaction mitigation shall be submitted to the City of Moorpark Public Works
Department for review and approval prior to the issuance of a Grading Permit. [PW]
72) The applicant shall eliminate or remediate all geologic hazards associated with this
proposed development to the satisfaction of the City of Moorpark Public Works
Department. [PW]
73) The applicant agrees to address and mitigate any and all engineering and
geotechnical design and construction issues not contained within these conditions,
associated with the proposed development that may arise during final design. [PW]
74) All existing and proposed easements shall be reflected on the project plans. [PW]
75) All grading and excavation shall be observed and docu mented by the project
Geotechnical Engineer, who shall verify that the excavation, grading, subdrainage,
backfill, compaction, and related operations are executed by the site construction
personnel in conformance with the provisions of the approved Geotechnical Report.
Any deficiencies noted shall be brought to the attention of the grading contractor and
the City. Such observations, verifications, related tests, and other pertinent
documentation shall be submitted to the City of Moorpark Public Works and
Community Development Departments for review and approval prior to the issuance
of a Building Permit. [PW]
76) Rough Grade Report. At the completion of rough grading, the project Geotechnical
Engineer shall submit a comprehensive rough grade report summarizing the required
observations, verifications, related tests, and other pertinent documentation to the City
of Moorpark Public Works and Community Development Departments for review and
approval prior to the issuance of a Building Permit. [PW]
Beltramo Ranch
Resolution No. PC-2022-672
Page 50
77) Rough Grade and Building Pad Certifications. Upon completion of rough grading, the
applicant shall submit Rough Grade and Building Pad Certifications on the City’s
forms. The certifications shall be signed by the project Geotechnical Engineer and
project Civil Engineer, as well as the Grading Contractor. The certification shall be
accompanied by as-built survey where deemed necessary by the City Engineer to
verify compliance with the limits and elevations required by the approved grading and
drainage plans. The Rough Grade and Building Pad Certifications shall be reviewed
in conjunction with the Rough Grade Report by the City of Moorpark Public Works
Department for approval prior to the issuance of a Building Permit. [PW]
78) Approval of Rough Grading. The project Rough Grade Report and Rough Grade and
Building Pad Certifications shall be reviewed and approved by the City Engineer.
Evidence of such approval shall be provided to the Community Development
Department, Building and Safety Division, prior to the issuance of a Building Permit.
No Building Permit shall be issued for the project without these approvals. [PW]
79) Final Grade Certification. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy (C of O),
the applicant shall submit a Final Grade Certification on the City’s form. The Final
Grade Certification shall be reviewed and approved by the City Engineer prior to the
issuance of a C of O for the project. [PW]
Final Map
80) The Final Map must be prepared in accordance with the latest copy of the, "Guide for
the Preparation of Tract Maps, Parcel Maps and Records of Survey/Corner Records"
as published by the Public Works Agency of the County of Ventura and amended from
time to time. The various jurat's/notary acknowledgements and certificates must be
modified, as appropriate, to reflect the jurisdiction of the City and the location of the
subdivision within the City. The Final Map must provide that each lot corner and street
centerline intersection, tangent point, and terminus be monumented with Ventura
County Road Standard survey monument plate E-4. Street monuments must be
intervisible. The E-4 monument disk stamping must read, "City of Moorpark", be
center punched to show the corner, and be stamped with the registration or license
number of the professional surveyor responsible for its location. [PW]
81) Concurrently with the submittal of the Final Map, the applicant shall submit a current
(dated within the last ninety (90) days) preliminary title report to the City Engineer and
Public Works Director, which clearly identifies all interested parties, lien holders,
lenders and all other parties having any record title interest in the real property being
subdivided. The preliminary title report must identify the holders of any easements that
affect the subdivision and contain the vesting deeds of ownership and easements.
Thirty (30) days prior to the submittal of the Final Map Mylar® sheets, the applicant
shall provide the City Engineer and Public Works Director, a subdivision guarantee
policy of the property within the Final Map and preliminary title report for each area of
easement proposed to be obtained for grading or construction of improvements. [PW]
Beltramo Ranch
Resolution No. PC-2022-672
Page 51
82) Prior to or concurrently with the submittal of the Final Map, the applicant shall provide
written evidence to the City Engineer and Public Works Director that a copy of the
conditionally approved Tentative Map together with a copy of Section 66436 of the
State Subdivision Map Act has been transmitted to each public entity or public utility
that is an easement holder of record. The applicant shall obtain subordination of
senior rights of easement from any such public utility in favor of the City. [PW]
83) At least one-hundred-twenty (120) days prior to the filing of the Final Map, if any
improvement which the applicant is required to construct or install is to be constructed
or installed upon land in which the applicant does not have title or interest sufficient
for such purposes, the applicant shall comply with all of the requirements of
Subdivision Map Act Section 66462.5 and any provision amendatory or
supplementary thereto. Prior to the filing of the Final Map the applicant shall provide
the City with an executed offsite property acquisition agreement in a form acceptable
to the Community Development Director, City Attorney, and City Manager. As a part
of the notification to the City required by that section, the applicant shall provide the
City a deposit in an amount approved by the Community Development Director,
sufficient to pay the estimated costs and fees to be ac crued by the City in obtaining
said property. Within fifteen (15) days of notification by the City that the deposited
funds are insufficient to complete the acquisition, the applicant shall deposit such
additional funds that the Community Development Director deems necessary. During
the time between notice of insufficiency of deposited funds and payment of said
insufficiency, the time limits of Section 66462.5 shall toll. [PW]
84) Prior to Final Map approval, the applicant shall obtain City Engineer and Public Works
Director approval of all required public improvement and grading plans. The applicant
shall enter into an agreement with the City of Moorpark to complete grading, public
improvements and subdivision monumentation and post sufficient surety
guaranteeing the construction and maintenance of grading all public improvements,
and private street and storm drain improvements; construction and post construction
NPDES Best Management Practice; and subdivision monumentation in a form and in
an amount acceptable to the City Engineer. The plans must be prepared by a
California Registered Civil Engineer and sureties must meet the City's requirements
for sureties and must remain in place for one year following final acceptance of the
improvements by the City or until such time that the City Council shall approve their
redemption, whichever is the longer. [PW]
85) Prior to Final Map approval, the applicant shall post sufficient surety in an amount
acceptable to the Community Development Director, City Engineer, Public Works
Director and in a form approved by City Attorney guaranteeing the payment of laborers
and materials men in an amount no less than fifty percent (50%) of the faithful
performance surety. [PW]
86) Prior to Final Map approval and upon submittal of the Final Map Mylar® sheets, the
applicant shall provide the City Engineer and Public Works Director electronic files of
Beltramo Ranch
Resolution No. PC-2022-672
Page 52
the Final Map, complete in every fashion except for signatures, in a format satisfactory
to the City Engineer and Public Works Director. [PW]
87) Upon recordation of the Final Map(s) the applicant shall forward a photographic
process copy on 3-mil polyester film of the recorded Map(s) to the City Engineer and
Public Works Director. [PW]
88) Prior to Final Map approval, the applicant shall show all lot-to-lot drainage easements
or secondary drainage easements delineated on the Final Map. Assurance in the form
of an agreement must be provided to the City that these easements will be adequately
maintained by the property owners to safely convey sto rmwater flows. Said agreement
must be submitted to the City Engineer and Public Works Director and City Attorney
for review and approval and must include provisions for the owner’s association to
maintain any private storm drain not maintained by a City As sessment District in
conformance with the NPDES. The agreement must be a durable agreement that is
binding upon each property owner of each lot and successors in interest. [PW]
89) Prior to Final Map approval, the applicant shall fully complete the "Final M ap
Processing Procedures" as outlined in Moorpark Administrative Procedure (MAP) CD-
18, available from the Community Development Department. [PW]
90) Prior to Final Map approval, applicant shall provide all improvement plans for review
and concurrence from the Engineering Department. [PW]
91) Prior to Final Map approval, all public utility easements shall be reviewed and
accepted by the utility provider(s) and/or public agency(ies). [PW]
92) The Final Map shall contain a plat which reflects the subject property, property lines,
easements of record, any new easements proposed (which are intended to be
conveyed by the Final Map), a metes and bounds legal description, basis of bearings,
data tables and other pertinent data. [PW]
93) The applicant’s engineer shall plot all referenced easements on the site plans, grading
plans and Final Map. [PW]
Public And Private Streets And Related Improvements
94) Prior to construction of any public improvement, the applicant shall submit to the City
Engineer and Public Works Director, for review and approval, street improvement
plans prepared by a California Registered Civil Engineer, and enter into an agreement
with the City of Moorpark to complete public improvements, with sufficient surety
posted to guarantee the complete construction of all improvements, except as
specifically noted in these Standard Conditions or Special Conditions of Approval.
[PW]
Beltramo Ranch
Resolution No. PC-2022-672
Page 53
95) Prior to issuance of the first building permit, all existing and proposed utilities, including
electrical transmission lines less than 67Kv, must be undergrounded consistent with
plans approved by the City Engineer, Public Works Director and Community
Development Director. [CDD & PW]
96) Prior to final inspection of improvements, the project Registered Civil Engineer shall
submit certified original "record drawing" plans with three (3) sets of paper prints and
the appropriate plan revision review fees to the City Engineer and Public Works
Director along with electronic files in a format satisfactory to the City Engineer and
Public Works Director. These "record drawing" plans must incorporate all plan
revisions and all construction deviations from the approved plans and revisions
thereto. The plans must be "record drawings" on 24" X 36" Mylar® sheets (made with
proper overlaps) with a City title block on each sheet. In addition, the applicant shall
provide an electronic file update of the City's Master Base Map electronic file,
incorporating all streets, sidewalks, streetlights, traffic control facilities, street striping,
signage and delineation, storm drainage facilities, water and sewer mains, lines and
appurtenances and any other utility facility installed for this project. [PW]
97) Prior to reduction of improvement bonds, the applicant must submit reproducible
centerline tie sheets on 3-mil polyester film to the City Engineer and Public Works
Director. [PW]
98) Prior to Grading Permit Issuance, all street dedications and vacations shall be
reviewed for technical correctness and acceptance by the City. [PW]
99) All driveway approaches that cross an accessible path or sidewalk shall be ADA
compliant. [PW]
100) Standard roadway designs, per the most current Ventura County Road Standards,
shall be used for all public and private street improvements. This includes all
proposed knuckles and cul-de-sac designs. [PW]
101) The applicant shall provide plans detailing the design of the horizontal and vertical
alignment for the project’s access driveways and vehicle circulation to the
satisfaction of the County of Ventura Fire Department and City of Moorpark P ublic
Works Department. Such design shall utilize standards for vertical curve, sight
distance and turning movement design consistent with County of Ventura, AASHTO
and City of Moorpark design requirements. Design plans shall be submitted to the
City of Moorpark Public Works Department for review and approval prior to the
issuance of a Grading Permit. [PW]
102) The applicant shall submit Street Improvement Plans, prepared by a California
Registered Civil Engineer, detailing the design of frontage improvements including
curb, gutter, sidewalk, roadway pavement, drainage, signage, striping, utilities and
other improvements. Plans shall include designs and details of existing and
proposed sidewalk and driveway transitions compliant with the Americans with
Beltramo Ranch
Resolution No. PC-2022-672
Page 54
Disabilities Act (ADA) as well as disabled access provisions as contained in the
latest edition of the California Building Code (CBC), as amended by the County of
Ventura and the City of Moorpark. Any existing frontage improvements (sidewalk,
driveway(s), clearances around above-ground utility poles, utility boxes, etc.) shall
be reviewed and upgraded as necessary to comply with disabled accessibility
standards. Street Improvement Plans shall be submitted to the City Engineer and
Public Works Director for review and approval prior to the issuance of a Grading
Permit. (PW)
Drainage And Hydrology
103) Prior to approval of a grading plan, the applicant shall submit a drainage plan with
calculations that analyze conditions before and after development, as well as
potential development proposed, approved, or shown in the General Plan for the
review and approval of the City Engineer and Public Works Director. Quantities of
water, water flow rates, major watercourses, drainage areas and patterns,
diversions, collection systems, flood hazard areas, sumps, sump locations,
detention and NPDES facilities and drainage courses must be addressed. [PW]
104) Hydrology calculations must be per current Ventura County Watershed Protection
Agency Standards and to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and Public Works
Director. Development projects within a 100-year flood zone may require a
Conditional Letter of Map Revisions (CLOMR) and Letter of Map Revision (LOMR)
as determined by the City Engineer and Public Works Director. [PW]
105) All storm water detention, retention, and impoundment facilities shall provide
access for maintenance purposes. This includes, but is not limited to, maintenance
access roads, vehicle and/or man gates, and adequate space to maneuver
equipment. [PW]
106) Provide a complete Hydrology and Hydraulic Report for the entire development.
This includes all technical analysis for storm water impoundment and conveyance
facilities, peak flow mitigation analysis, storm water runoff calculations, and facility
sizing design requirements. If the improvements are to be phased, any interim
drainage condition shall be considered as part of the proposed improvements. [PW]
107) If drainage is conveyed to adjacent properties, additional easements and/or
approvals may be required. [PW]
108) The applicant shall submit a Project Drainage Report, prepared by a California
Registered Civil Engineer, to address existing and proposed hydrology, including
offsite flow patterns which currently influence the project site. Report shall address
developed hydrology associated with the site development, based on the provisions
of the Ventura County Hydrology Manual and associated methodology, addressing
both 10-year and 100-year existing and proposed drainage conditions, including
provisions for the interception and conveyance of the 10 -year design storm and
flood hazards associated with the 100-year storm. Calculations for the mitigation of
Beltramo Ranch
Resolution No. PC-2022-672
Page 55
increased stormwater runoff shall be provided to support on-site detention facility
sizing. Calculations shall address the detailing and sizing of area drains, catch
basins and storm drain laterals on site, and shall be coordinated with the project
Storm Drain Plans. The Project Drainage Report shall be submitted to the City of
Moorpark Public Works Department for review and approval prior to the issuance
of a Grading Permit. [PW]
109) The applicant’s engineer shall provide for detention of on -site storm drainage,
based on either offsite storm drain capacity limitati ons or a ‘no net increase’
approach, whichever yields the greater volume or required detention. In either case
the required volume shall be calculated by unit hydrograph or other approved
means. Such calculations shall be included in the Project Drainage Report. [PW]
110) Unless specifically approved by the City of Moorpark, the on-site storm drain system
shall be privately owned and maintained. Storm drain plans shall clarify that the on -
site storm drain system is not to be maintained by either the City of Moorpark or the
County of Ventura. [PW]
National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES)
111) Prior to the start of grading or any ground disturbance, the applicant shall identify a
responsible person experienced in NPDES compliance who is acceptable to the
City Engineer and Public Works Director. The designated NPDES person
(superintendent) shall be present, on the project site Monday through Friday and
on all other days when the probability of rain is forty percent (40%) or greater and
prior to the start of and during all grading or clearing operations until the release of
grading bonds. The superintendent shall have full authority to rent equipment and
purchase materials to the extent needed to effectuate Best Management Practices.
The superintendent shall be required to assume NPDES compliance during the
construction of streets, storm drainage systems, all utilities, buildings, and final
landscaping of the site. [PW]
112) Development shall conform to the current requirements for the County’s MS4 permit
for new developments. [PW]
113) All storm water facilities shall conform to the most current Ventura County Technical
Guidance Manual for Storm Water Quality Control Measures. This includes all HOA
and Facilities District maintained storm water quality facilities. [PW]
114) In-tract improvements shall incorporate Low Impact Development standards. [PW]
115) A State Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan is required for all ground disturbing
activities that are greater than one acre. Prior to Grading Permit issuance, a Notice
of Intent (NOI) and the SWPPP shall be filed with the State Water Resources
Control Board, and a Waste Water Discharge Identification Number and
Construction General Permit must obtained. [PW]
Beltramo Ranch
Resolution No. PC-2022-672
Page 56
116) Development shall conform to the current requirements for the County’s MS4 permit
for new developments. The applicant’s engineer shall design required water quality
mitigation features and related storm water mitigation volumes (Qpm) in
accordance with the Ventura County Technical Guidance Manual for Stormwater
Quality Control Measures, NPDES and City requirements. Calculations shall be
submitted with the Project Drainage Report. All covenants shall be submitted to the
City of Moorpark Public Works Department for review and approval and be recorded
prior to Grading Permit issuance. [PW]
117) The applicant’s engineer shall provide for the mitigation of the project’s storm water
quality impacts. The applicant’s engineer shall provide calculations for the sizing
and location of devices intended to mitigate such impacts and coordinate the
locations of required water quality treatment devices on the Storm Drain Plans. The
details of the required devices shall be included in the Project Drainage Report and
detailed on the project plans. [PW]
118) Prior to the issuance of any construction/Grading Permit and/or the commencement
of any qualifying, grading or excavation, the applicant for projects with facilities
identified as subject to the State Board General Industrial and Commercial permits
shall prepare and submit a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP). The
SWPPP must address post-construction compliance with stormwater quality
management regulations for the project. The SWPPP, improvement plans and
grading plans must note that the contractor shall comply with the latest edition of
the California Best Management Practices New Development and Redevel opment
Handbook, published by the California Stormwater Quality Association. The
SWPPP must comply with the Ventura Countywide Stormwater Quality
Management Program Land Development Guidelines, Technical Guidance Manual
for Stormwater Quality Control Measures, and the Stormwater Management
Program (SMP) to develop, achieve, and implement a timely, comprehensive, cost-
effective stormwater pollution control program to reduce pollutants to the maximum
extent practicable. The SWPPP must be prepared in compliance with the form and
format established in the Ventura Countywide Stormwater Quality Management
Program, and submitted, with appropriate review deposits, for the review and
approval of the City Engineer/Public Works Director. The proposed plan must also
address all relevant NPDES requirements, maintenance measures, estimated life
spans of Best Management Practices facilities, operational recommendations and
recommendations for specific Best Management Practices technology, including all
related costs. The use of permanent dense ground cover planting approved by the
City Engineer/Public Works Director and Community Development Director is
required for all graded slopes. Methods of protecting the planted slopes from
damage must be identified. Proposed managemen t efforts during the lifetime of the
project must include best available technology. “Passive” and “natural” BMP
drainage facilities are to be provided such that surface flows are intercepted and
treated on the surface over biofilters (grassy swales), infiltration areas and other
similar solutions. The use of filters, separators, clarifiers, absorbents, adsorbents
or similar “active” devices is not acceptable and may not be used without specific
Beltramo Ranch
Resolution No. PC-2022-672
Page 57
prior approval of the City Council. The use of biological filtering, bio-remediation,
infiltration of pre-filtered stormwater and similar measures that operate without
annual maintenance intervention, that are failsafe, that, when maintenance is
needed, will present the need for maintenance in an obvious fashion and which will
be maintainable in a cost effective and non-disruptive fashion is required. As
deemed appropriate for each project, the SWPPP must establish a continuing
program of monitoring, operating and maintenance to:
a) Provide discharge quality monitoring.
b) Assess impacts to receiving water quality resulting from discharged waters.
c) Identify site pollutant sources.
d) Educate management, maintenance personnel and users, to obtain user
awareness and compliance with NPDES goals.
e) Measure management program effectiveness.
f) Investigate and implement improved BMP strategies.
g) Maintain, replace and upgrade BMP facilities (establish BMP facility
inspection standards and clear guidelines for maintenance and
replacement).Secure the funding, in perpetuity, to achieve items “a” through
“g” above. [PW]
Ground Disturbance
119) If any archeological, paleontological, or historical finds are uncovered during grading
or excavation operations, all grading or excavation shall immediately cease in the
immediate area and the find must be left untouched. The applicant, in consultation
with the project paleontologist or archeologist, shall assure the preservation of the
site and immediately contact the Community Development Director by phone, in
writing by email or hand delivered correspondence informing the Director of the find.
In the absence of the Director, the applicant shall so inform the City Manager and
Planning Manager. The applicant shall be required to obtain the services of a
qualified paleontologist or archeologist, whichever is appropriate to recommend
disposition of the site. The paleontologist or archeologist selected must be approved
in writing by the Community Development Director. The applicant shall pay for all
costs associated with the investigation and disposition of the find. [CDD]
120) Archeological Training: Prior to any ground disturbing activity, construction
personnel associated with earth moving equipment, drilling, grading, and
excavating, shall be provided with basic training conducted by a qualified
archaeologist. Issues that shall be included in the basic training will be geared
toward training the applicable construction crews in the identification of
archaeological deposits, further described below. Training will include written
notification of the restrictions regarding disturbance and/or removal of any portion of
archaeological, paleontological, or historical deposits and the procedures to follow
should a resource be identified. The construction contractor, or its designee, shall
be responsible for implementation of this measure. A tribal monitor shall be provided
an opportunity to attend the pre-construction briefing if requested. [CDD]
Beltramo Ranch
Resolution No. PC-2022-672
Page 58
121) Inadvertent Discovery of Human Remains. The inadvertent discovery of human
remains is always a possibility during ground disturbances; State of California Health
and Safety Code Section 7050.5 addresses these findings. This code section states
that in the event human remains are uncovered, no further disturbance shall occur
until the County Coroner has determined the origin and disposition of the remains
pursuant to California Public Resources Code Section 5097.98. The Coroner must
be notified of the find immediately, together with the City and the property owner. If
the human remains are determined to be prehistoric, the Cor oner will notify the
Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC), which will determine and notify a
Most Likely Descendant (MLD). The MLD shall complete the inspection of the site
within 48 hours of notification and may recommend scientific removal and
nondestructive analysis of human remains and items associated with Native
American burials and an appropriate reinternment site.
122) Paleontological Plan: If paleontological remains are discovered, a paleontological
mitigation plan outlining procedures for paleontological data recovery must be
prepared and submitted to the Community Development Director for review and
approval. The development and implementation of this Plan must include
consultations with the Applicant's engineering geologist as well as a requirement
that the curation of all specimens recovered under any scenario will be through the
Los Angeles County Museum of Natural History (LACMNH). All specimens become
the property of the City of Moorpark unless the City chooses otherwise. If the City
accepts ownership, the curation location may be revised. The monitoring and data
recovery should include periodic inspections of excavations to recover exposed
fossil materials. The cost of this data recovery is limited to the discovery of a
reasonable sample of available material. The interpretation of reasonableness rests
with the Community Development Director. [CDD]
California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) – Mitigated Negative Declaration
123) All mitigation measures required as part of an approved Mitigation Monitoring Report
and Program (MMRP) for this entitlement are hereby adopted and included as
requirements of this entitlement. Where conflict or duplication between the MMRP
and the Conditions of Approval occurs the Community Development Directo r shall
determine compliance so long as it does not conflict with the California
Environmental Quality Act and the more restrictive measure or condition shall apply.
[CDD]
Cable Television
124) Prior to commencement of project construction, the applicant shall provide notice of
its construction schedule to all persons holding a valid cable television franchise
issued by the City of Moorpark (Cable Franchisees) sufficiently in advance of
construction to allow the Cable Franchisees to coordinate installation of their
equipment and infrastructure with that schedule. The City shall provide the applicant
a list of Cable Franchisees upon request. During construction, the applicant shall
allow the Cable Franchisees to install any equipment or infrastructure (including
Beltramo Ranch
Resolution No. PC-2022-672
Page 59
conduit, power supplies, and switching equipment) necessary to provide
Franchisee's services to all parcels and lots in the Project. [CDD]
125) In the event the cable television services or their equivalent are provided to the
project or individual lots under collective arrangement or any collective means other
than a Cable Franchise (including, but not limited to, programming provided over a
wireless or satellite system contained within the Project), the Home Owners
Association (HOA), property owner association or other applicable entity shall pay
monthly to City an access fee of five percent (5%) of gross revenue generated by
the provision of those services, or the highest franchise fee required from any City
Cable Franchisee, whichever is greater. "Gross revenue" is as defined in Chapter
5.06 of the Moorpark Municipal Code and any successor amendment or
supplementary provision thereto. In the event there is no HOA (e.g. in the case of
an apartment project), then the property owner shall ma ke the payment. [CDD]
126) In the event cable television services or their equivalent are provided to the project
by any means other than by a City Cable Franchise, the City's government channel
shall be available to all units as part of any such service, on the same basis and cost
as if the project was served by a City Cable Franchise. [CDD]
AGENCY CONDITIONS
Moorpark Police Department
127) A Landscape Maintenance Plan shall be prepared prior to the installation of
landscape improvements and maintained throughout the life of the project by the
Homeowner’s Association. The plan shall be submitted to the Community
Development Department and Police Department for review prior to installation of
common area landscaping. The Landscape Maintenance Plan shall dictate that all
tree canopies shall be maintained no lower than 6 feet in height and all shrubbery
no higher than two feet in height. [PD]
128) Park benches throughout the development should have a center arm rest to prevent
people from sleeping on them. [PD]
129) Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, Park Rules and Operational
Guidelines shall be prepared for the park and other common amenities available to
residents and general public. The Park Rules and Operational Guidelines should
include hours of operation, Homeowner’s Association contact information, access
signage, etc. to the satisfaction of the Police Department. [PD]
130) Prior to the issuance of any Building Permits, a lighting photometric plan shall be
approved by the Police Department. The lighting plan shall indicate adequate
lighting along common walkways, park, and other amenities available to residents
and the general public to ensure sufficient lighting is provided. [PD]
Ventura County Watershed Protection
Beltramo Ranch
Resolution No. PC-2022-672
Page 60
131) Mitigation of Cumulative Impacts on Jurisdictional Channels. To comply with the
Ventura County Watershed Protection District Ordinance WP-2, as amended, and
applicable City requirements. The proposed development shall incorporate
mitigation measures to address cumulative impacts due to the proposed increase in
imperviousness. The project shall either reduce the developed condition peaks to
the existing condition peaks for the 10-, 25-, 50-, and 100-year storms or meet the
City requirements for mitigation. The most restrictive standard shall apply. The
applicant shall submit a drainage study evaluating the existing and proposed
conditions and presenting the design of a drainage system that will mitigate any
increases in peak runoff to the above requirements. Acceptance of the drainage
study will be completed as part of the City’s standard plan -check process. The
drainage study shall be reviewed and accepted as meeting the applicable
requirements prior to obtaining a building permit, grading permit, or prior to project
start date if no grading or building permits are required. Prior to issuance of the first
certificate of occupancy, City staff shall inspect the improvements to assure that
construction was completed in accordance with the approved plans. [VCWPD]
Ventura County Public Works Water and Sanitation
132) Prior to the issuance of a Signed Agreement to Install Water and Sewer
Improvements the Applicant shall provide Ventura County Waterworks District with
the following:
a. Water and sewer improvement plans prepared in accordance with District
standards.
i. Water improvements shall have at least two (2) points of connection
to provide a looped system.
ii. Points of connection shall be the 8” main within Beltramo Ranch
Road and through Glenwood Park to connect to the 8” main within
Harvester Street.
b. Hydraulic analysis by a registered Civil Engineer to determine the adequacy
of the proposed and existing water and sewer lines to determine the extent
of capital improvements to the existing water and sewer facilities to serve
the subject properties.
c. Digital copies of the grading, street, and storm drain plans.
d. A plan denoting the location of fire hydrants and copy of approvals by the
Ventura County Fire Protection District for fire hydrant locations.
e. Cost estimates for water and sewer improvements.
f. Plan check deposit, construction inspection deposit, capital improvement
charge, sewer connection fee, and meter charges per phase of the project.
g. Recorded easements dedicated to the District for water and sewer facility
improvements as shown on the recorded tract map. Dedicated easements
shall be over and across all streets and parking lots for access to maintain
and repair of the District’s substructures and facilities. [VCWD1]
Beltramo Ranch
Resolution No. PC-2022-672
Page 61
133) The District will provide “Will Serve Letters” upon completed review and acceptance
of the water and sewer improvement plans and payment of applicable fees.
[VCWD1]
134) Following the acceptance of the above items, Applicant is to provide Ventura
County Waterworks District with 3 sets of the signed Agreement to Install
improvements and Surety Bonds. [VCWD1]
135) The applicant shall comply with the applicable provisions of the Rules and
Regulations of the Ventura County Waterworks District. [VCWD1]
Ventura County Air Pollution Control Division
136) Discharge of Pollutants. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, and to ensure that
discharge of air contaminants that may result from site operations are minimized to
the greatest extent, the applicant shall operate in accordance with the Rules and
Regulations of the VCAPCD, with emphasis on Rule 51, Nuisance, which is
complaint driven. [APCD]
137) Asbestos Removal. Prior to issuance of a demolition permit, the applicant shall
submit Form AB3205 for the review and approval of APCD. In addition, the
contractor shall notify APCD 10 business days prior to the abatement
commencement, if applicable, by submitting a Notification of Demolition or
Renovation Form. Demolition and/or renovation activities shall be conducted in
compliance with APCD Rule 62.7, Asbestos – Demolition and Renovation.
Enforcement of notification requirements for both forms and compliance with the
APCD Asbestos Rule will be enforced by APCD Asbestos Inspectors or on a
complaint-basis. See http://vcapcd.org/Rulebook/RuleIndex.htm for more
information on APCD Rule 62.7- Asbestos- Demolition and Renovation. [VCAPCD]
138) Dust Control for Construction. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, and to en sure
that fugitive dust and particulate matter that may result from site preparation,
construction and/or grading activities, the applicant shall comply with the provisions
of applicable VCAPCD Rules and Regulations, which include but are not limited to,
Rule 50 (Opacity), Rule 51 (Nuisance), and Rule 55 (Fugitive Dust). [VCAPCD]
Ventura County Water and Sewer (Water District No. 01)
139) Prior to the issuance of a Signed Agreement to Install Water and Sewer
Improvements the Applicant shall provide Ventura County Waterworks District with
the following:
a) Water and sewer improvement plans prepared in accordance with District
standards.
i) Water improvements shall have at least two (2) points of connection to provide
a looped system.
Beltramo Ranch
Resolution No. PC-2022-672
Page 62
ii) Points of connection shall be the 8” main within Beltramo Ranch Road and
through Glenwood Park to connect to the 8” main within Harvester Street.
b) Hydraulic analysis by a registered Civil Engineer to determine the adequacy of the
proposed and existing water and sewer lines to determine the extent of capital
improvements to the existing water and sewer facilities to serve the subject
properties.
c) Digital copies of the grading, street, and storm drain plans.
d) A plan denoting the location of fire hydrants and copy of approvals by the Ventura
County Fire Protection District for fire hydrant locations.
e) Cost estimates for water and sewer improvements.
f) Plan check deposit, construction inspection deposit, capital improvement charge,
sewer connection fee, and meter charges per phase of the project.
g) Recorded easements dedicated to the District for water and sewer facility
improvements as shown on the recorded tract map. Dedicated easements shall be
over and across all streets and parking lots for access to maintain and repair of the
District’s substructures and facilities.
h) Landscaping irrigation water required must be offset with a waste source supplied
by the District by the Developer or an in lieu fee paid for new sources the District
intends to develop. (The in lieu fee can be calculated by number of acre-ft. of
landscaping water required / 5,000 acre-ft. (estimated production of the Desalter
Project) * $59,000,000 = in lieu fee.))
i) Developer must include system to route all dry weather (non -precipitation) runoff
to the sewer. [VCWD1]
140) The District will provide “Will Serve Letters” upon completed review and acceptance
of the water and sewer improvement plans and payment of applicable fees.
[VCWD1]
141) Following the acceptance of the above items, Applicant is to provide Ventura
County Waterworks District with 3 sets of the signed Agreement to Install
improvements and Surety Bonds. [VCWD1]
142) The applicant shall comply with the applicable provisions of the Rules and
Regulations of the Ventura County Waterworks District. [VCWD1]
Ventura County Fire Department
143) Access Road Width, Private Roads/Driveways - Private roads shall comply with
Public Road Standards. Fire Department Access - VCFD Standard 501
i) Access road width of 36 feet shall be provided for residential use with parallel
parking permitted on both sides.
ii) Access road width of 32 feet shall be provided for residential use with parallel
parking permitted on one side.
iii) Access road width of 24 feet shall be required with no on -street parking
permitted, or per Public Road Standards whichever is stricter. [VCFD]
Beltramo Ranch
Resolution No. PC-2022-672
Page 63
144) Construction Access - Prior to combustible construction, a paved all-weather
access road / driveway suitable for use by a 20-ton Fire District vehicle shall be
installed at locations approved by the Fire District. [VCFD]
145) Construction Access Utilities - Prior to combustible construction, all utilities located
within the access road and the first lift of the access road pavement shall be
installed. A minimum 20-foot clear width shall remain free of obstruction during any
construction activities within the development once combustible construction starts.
[VCFD]
146) Turning Radius - The access road shall be of sufficient width to allow for a 40-foot
centerline turning radius at all turns in the road. [VCFD]
147) Vertical Clearance - All access roads / driveways shall have a minimum vertical
clearance of 13 feet 6 inches (13' 6"). Clear of building to sky. [VCFD]
148) Parking Prohibited - The property owner(s) are hereby advised that parking on
access roads / driveways and fire department turnarounds is prohibited. [VCFD]
149) Access Road Location - The access / driveway shall be extended to within 150 feet
of all portions of the exterior walls of the first story of any building and shall be in
accordance with Fire District access standards. Where the access roadway cannot
be provided, approved fire protection system or systems shall be installed as
required and acceptable to the Fire District. [VCFD]
150) Site Access - Two (2) means of ingress/egress shall be provided to the
development in accordance with Fire District access standards. [VCFD]
151) Secondary Access for Existing Roads and New Subdivisions. Secondary access,
in accordance with Chapter 12, shall be provided where a new subdivision of land
is served from an existing dead-end access road that exceeds allowable dead-end
lengths as specified elsewhere in VCFD standard. Secondary access shall be
provided for the proposed subdivision regardless of where the new parcels take
access along the existing dead-end access road. The intent is not to further
increase the density on a dead-end road that exceeds allowable dead-end lengths.
South secondary access / egress to be operational 24/7. [VCFD]
152) Access Road Certification - That the access road(s)/driveway(s) shall be certified
by a registered civil engineer as having an all-weather surface in conformance with
Public Works and / or Fire District standards. This certification shall be submitted
to the Fire District for review and approval prior to occupancy. [VCFD]
153) Fire Lanes / Access Review (Submit prior to Building & Safety approval) - the
applicant shall submit two (2) site plans to the Fire District for review and approval
of Access and location of fire lanes. Prior to occupancy, all fire lanes shall be posted
“NO PARKING-FIRE LANE-TOW AWAY” in accordance with California Vehicle
Beltramo Ranch
Resolution No. PC-2022-672
Page 64
Code, the International Fire Code and current VCFPD Fire Lane Standards. All
signs and or Fire Lane markings shall be within recorded access easements.
[VCFD]
154) Access Road Gates - Any gates to control vehicle access are to be located to allow
a vehicle waiting for entrance to be completely off the intersecting roadway. A
minimum clear open width of 15 feet in each direction shall be provided for separate
entry / exit gates and a minimum 20 for combined entry / exit gates. If gates are to
be locked, a Knox system shall be installed. The method of gate control, including
operation during power failure (battery back-up), shall be subject to review by the
Fire Prevention Division. Gate plan details shall be submitted to the Fire District for
approval prior to installation. A final acceptance inspection by the Fire District is
required prior to placing any gate into service. [VCFD]
155) Road / Street Name Required - Public and private roads shall be named if serving
more than four (4) parcels or as required by the Fire department. [VCFD]
156) Street Names - Prior to recordation of street names, proposed names shall be
submitted to the Fire District's Fire Prevention Bureau for review and approval.
[VCFD]
157) Walkways - Approved walkways shall be provided from all building openings to the
public way or fire department access road / driveway. [VCFD]
158) Address Numbers (Single Family Homes) - Address numbers, a minimum of 4
inches (4") high, shall be installed prior to occupancy, shall be of contrasting color
to the background, and shall be readily visible at night. Brass or gold -plated
numbers shall not be used. Where structures are set back more than 150 feet (150')
from the street, larger numbers will be required so that they are distinguishable from
the street. In the event the structure(s) is not visible from the street, the address
number(s) shall be posted adjacent to the driveway entrance on an elevated post.
[VCFD]
159) Address Number Plan - A plan shall be submitted to the Fire District for review
indicating the method in which buildings are to be identified by address numbers.
[VCFD]
160) Fire Hydrant Plan - Prior to construction, the applicant shall submit plans to the
Fire District for placement of fire hydrants. On plans, show existing hydrants within
500 feet of the development. Indicate the type of hydrant, number and size of
outlets. [VCFD]
161) Fire Hydrant(s) Required Standard 14.5.3 - Fire hydrant(s) shall be provided in
accordance with current adopted edition of the International Fire Code, Appendix C
and adopted amendments. On-site fire hydrants may be required as determined by
the Fire District. [VCFD]
Beltramo Ranch
Resolution No. PC-2022-672
Page 65
162) Fire Hydrant Design (Single Family Homes) - Fire hydrants shall be installed and in
service prior to combustible construction and shall conform to the minimum
standards of the Ventura County Water Works Manual and the following. [VCFD]
a) Each hydrant shall be a 6-inch wet barrel design and shall have one (1) 4 inch and
one (1) 2 ½ inch outlet.
b) The required fire flow of 1000 gpm shall be achieved at no less than 20-psi residual
pressure.
c) Fire hydrants shall be spaced 500 feet on center, and so located that no structure
will be farther than 250 feet from any one hydrant.
d) Fire hydrants shall be set back from the curb face 24 inches on center.
e) No obstructions, including walls, trees, light and sign posts, meter, shall be placed
within three (3) feet of any hydrant.
f) A concrete pad shall be installed extending 18 inches out from the fire hydrant.
g) Ground clearance to the lowest operating nut shall be between 18 to 24 inches.
[VCFD]
163) Fire Hydrant Installation - Prior to combustible construction on any parcel, a fire
hydrant capable of providing the required fire flow and duration shall be installed
and in service along the access road / driveway at a location approved by the Fire
District, but no further than 250 feet from the building site. The owner of the
combustible construction is responsible for the cost of this installation. [VCFD]
164) Hydrant Location Markers - Prior to occupancy of any structure, blue reflective
hydrant location markers shall be placed on the access roads in accordance with
Fire District standards. If the final asphalt cap is not in place at time of occupancy,
hydrant location markers shall still be installed and shall be replaced when the final
asphalt cap in completed. [VCFD]
165) Fire Flow Verification - Prior to map recordation, the applicant shall provide to the
Fire District, verification from the water purveyor that the purveyor can provide the
required fire flow of 1,000 gallons per minute at 20 psi for a minimum (2) hour
duration.
i) Exceptions: 1. A reduction in required Fire-flow of 50 percent, as approved, is
allowed when the building is equipped with an approved automatic fire sprinkler
system.
166) Fire Sprinklers - All structures shall be provided with an automatic fire sprinkler
system in accordance with current VCFPD Ordinance at time of building permit
application. [VCFD]
167) Fire Department Clearance (Submit prior to Building & Safety approval) - Applicant
shall obtain VCFD Form #610 "Fire Permit Application” and Form #625 “Fire Flow
Verification” prior to obtaining a building permit for any new structures or additions
to existing structures. [VCFD]
Beltramo Ranch
Resolution No. PC-2022-672
Page 66
Existing Proposed
High Density Residential (7 DU/AC)
Low Density Residential (1 DU/AC)
Park (P)Exhibit DProposed General Plan Land Use and Zoning Map AmendmentsGeneral Plan Land Use Designation Map Beltramo Ranch Resolution No. PC-2022-672 Page 67
Existing Proposed
Single Family Residential (R-1)
Rural Exclusive (RE-20)
Residential Planned Development (RPD-7)ZoningDesignation Map Exhibit DProposed General Plan Land Use and Zoning Map AmendmentsBeltramo Ranch Resolution No. PC-2022-672 Page 68
FINAL MITIGATED NEGATIVE
DECLARATION FOR THE BELTRAMO RANCH
RESIDENTIAL PROJECT
MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA
Prepared for:
CITY OF MOORPARK
799 Moorpark Avenue
Moorpark, California 93021
Prepared by:
CHAMBERS GROUP, INC.
600 West Broadway, Suite 350
Glendale, California 91204
JUNE 2022
Exhibit E
Final Mitigated Negative Declaration for Beltramo Ranch Residential Project
Moorpark, Ventura County, California
Chambers Group, Inc.
21328
ii
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
SECTION 1.0 – INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................... 1
1.1 DRAFT INITIAL STUDY / MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION .................................................... 1
1.2 AVAILABILITY OF THE NOI AND IS/MND ....................................................................................... 1
SECTION 2.0 – PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING ............................................... 2
2.1 PROJECT PURPOSE AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION .............................................................. 2
2.2 PROJECT LOCATION AND SITE CHARACTERISTICS ........................................................................ 2
2.2.1 Location ............................................................................................................................ 2
2.2.2 Site Characteristics ........................................................................................................... 4
2.2.3 Site Access and Circulation .............................................................................................. 4
2.2.4 General Plan Designation/Zoning .................................................................................... 4
2.3 PROJECT DESCRIPTION ................................................................................................................. 5
2.3.1 Construction ................................................................................................................... 10
2.3.2 Site Development and Construction Measures ............................................................. 13
2.3.3 Operations and Maintenance ........................................................................................ 14
2.4 PERMITS AND AGREEMENTS ...................................................................................................... 14
SECTION 3.0 – FINDINGS................................................................................................................... 15
SECTION 4.0 – MITIGATION MEASURES ............................................................................................ 16
SECTION 5.0 – CIRCULATION ............................................................................................................. 17
SECTION 6.0 – RESPONSE TO COMMENTS ......................................................................................... 18
SECTION 7.0 – REVISIONS TO THE DRAFT MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION ................................. 36
SECTION 8.0 – MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION ......................................................................... 41
SECTION 9.0 – REFERENCES .............................................................................................................. 42
APPENDIX A – Air Quality/Greenhouse Gas Emissions Impact Analysis (Updated)
APPENDIX I – Traffic Report (Updated)
Final Mitigated Negative Declaration for Beltramo Ranch Residential Project
Moorpark, Ventura County, California
Chambers Group, Inc.
21328
iii
LIST OF TABLES
Table 1: Existing General Plan / Zoning/ Land Use ....................................................................................... 4
Table 2: Project Features .............................................................................................................................. 5
LIST OF FIGURES
Page
Figure 1: Project Vicinity Map ....................................................................................................................... 3
Figure 2: Site Plan.......................................................................................................................................... 8
Figure 3:- Landscape Plan ............................................................................................................................. 9
Figure 4: Current and Proposed General Plan Land Use Designations ....................................................... 11
Figure 5: Current and Proposed Zoning Designations ................................................................................ 12
Final Mitigated Negative Declaration for Beltramo Ranch Residential Project
Moorpark, Ventura County, California
Chambers Group, Inc.
21328
1
SECTION 1.0 – INTRODUCTION
1.1 DRAFT INITIAL STUDY / MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
On May 13, 2022, the City of Moorpark distributed the Draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
(IS/MND) for the Beltramo Ranch Residential Project to public agencies and the general public. In
accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Section 21091 and State CEQA
Guidelines Section 15073, a 30-day public review period for the Draft IS/MND was provided from May 13,
2022 to June 13, 2022. The Planning Commission will review the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative
Declaration for adoption on June 28, 2022, at its regularly scheduled Planning Commission meeting
located at 799 Moorpark Avenue.
1.2 AVAILABILITY OF THE NOI AND IS/MND
The NOI and the IS/MND were available for review at the following locations:
Development and Community Services Building, City Hall, 799 Moorpark Avenue, Moorpark,
California, 93021
Moorpark Library, 699 Moorpark Avenue, Moorpark California, 93021
Online at: www.moorparkca.gov/568/Environmental-Documents
Final Mitigated Negative Declaration for Beltramo Ranch Residential Project
Moorpark, Ventura County, California
Chambers Group, Inc.
21328
2
SECTION 2.0 – PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING
2.1 PROJECT PURPOSE AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION
Warmington Residential (Applicant) proposes the construction of a new single-family detached residential
development, including privately maintained streets and community open space, on approximately 7.4
acres of land at the southeast corner of Los Angeles Avenue and Beltramo Ranch Road (Project, Proposed
Project) in the City of Moorpark (City), Ventura County (County). The Project also includes a proposed
change to the land use designations. The purpose of the Proposed Project is to provide a new housing
community, along with recreation opportunities, at a location consistent with the City’s Housing Element
related to infill development.
The City is the lead agency for the Proposed Project. This Initial Study has been prepared in accordance
with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA, Public Resources Code §21000 et seq.) and the State
CEQA Guidelines (Title 14, California Code of Regulations [CCR], §15000 et seq.) and has determined that
preparation of a Mitigated Negative Declaration would be appropriate under CEQA.
2.2 PROJECT LOCATION AND SITE CHARACTERISTICS
2.2.1 Location
The Project site is located at 11930 Los Angeles Avenue at the southeast corner of Los Angeles Avenue
and Beltramo Ranch Road (Assessor’s Parcel Numbers [APNs] 504-0-021-195, 506-0-030-210, 506-0-030-
220, 506-0-030-235, 506-0-030-045, and 506-0-030-055). The Project site is located on Los Angeles
Avenue, which is also California State Route (SR) 118, and is approximately 2 miles west of SR
23/Moorpark Freeway. The Project site is approximately 22 miles east of the Pacific Ocean.
The Project site comprises approximately 7.4 acres with a portion of the site currently occupied by a
church, two single-family homes, and various outbuildings. The existing single-family homes and church
are proposed to be demolished as part of the Proposed Project construction. Existing residences are
located to the south, east, and west of the Project site with industrial buildings located north of Los
Angeles Avenue. The Project site is located between the Heather Glen neighborhood to the west, which
is developed as a high density residential development 1 with 8.4 dwelling units per acre (DUAC), and the
Maureen Lane neighborhood to the east which is built as low density residential 2 with 1.75 DUAC. The
Project site is within walking distance of commercial shopping and retail areas along Los Angeles Avenue.
1 General Plan Land Use Designation: High Density Residential (7 dwelling units per acre)
2 General Plan Land Use Designation: Low Density Residential (1 dwelling per acre)
SanBernardino
Kern
SanLuisObispo
Ventura
Santa Barbara
RiversideOrange
Los Angeles
San Diego1:24,000 1:5,000,000
Figure 1Beltramo RanchProject Vicinity
Name: 21328 PLAN Fig 1 Project Vicinity.MxdPrint Date: 2/3/2022 11:38:18 AM Author: pcarlos
0 200 400100
Feet
´
Project Location
")
Final Mitigated Negative Declaration for Beltramo Ranch Residential Project
Moorpark, Ventura County, California
Chambers Group, Inc.
21328
3
Figure 1: Project Vicinity Map
Final Mitigated Negative Declaration for Beltramo Ranch Residential Project
Moorpark, Ventura County, California
Chambers Group, Inc.
21328
4
2.2.2 Site Characteristics
The Project site is a mixture of developed and undeveloped land, with the northern portion of the site
developed with The Fountain Foursquare Church and a single-family residence and another single-family
residence toward the middle of the site. The remainder of the site is undeveloped but disturbed and
generally flat with a slight slope to the south. The site contains some ornamental landscaping, a dirt road,
and disturbed dirt areas.
2.2.3 Site Access and Circulation
Vehicular access to the Project site will be provided via a new private loop street, Beltramo Ranch Road,
which will be accessed from Los Angeles Avenue. Currently, Beltramo Ranch Road is an unimproved dirt
road that runs along the western edge of the site. The new in-tract street will be a private drive and will
provide direct entry to the Project site. The access point will allow left-turns and right-turns onto Beltramo
Ranch Road but would restrict outbound movement onto Los Angeles Avenue to eastbound right turns
only. Pedestrian gates will be provided at the southern end of the site to provide pedestrian access to the
Arroyo Simi and along the western panhandle for access to Glenwood Park. An emergency vehicle and
utility access road will be provided to the east of the open space area. One vehicular gate will be provided
at the southern end to allow Southern California Edison to access to their property. Another vehicular
gate will be installed at the western terminus of Loretta Drive for emergency access and private access for
Loretta Drive residents only. For access from Los Angeles Avenue, the Project will restripe Los Angeles
Avenue at the Beltramo Ranch Road and Maureen Lane intersections to provide left-turn pockets of
sufficient length to the satisfaction of Caltrans and City of Moorpark.
2.2.4 General Plan Designation/Zoning
The Project site’s General Plan designation is Park (P), Low Density Residential (L) which allows the
development of one DUAC, and High Density Residential (H) which allows the development of seven
DUAC. The surrounding General Plan designations are Low Density Residential (L) and Very High Density
Residential (VH) to the east, High Density Residential (H) to the west, Medium Industrial (I-2) to the north,
and Open Space and Recreation (OS-2) and Floodway (FLDWY) to the south. The zoning designation of the
Project site is Rural Exclusive (RE-20) and Single-Family Residential (R-1). The zoning of the surrounding
properties include Residential Planned Development (RPD-8.4U) to the west and east, Limited Industrial
(M-2) to the north, and Open Space (OS) to the south.
Table 1: Existing General Plan / Zoning/ Land Use
Direction General Plan Zoning Existing Land Use
Project Site
Park (P), Low Density
Residential (L), High
Density Residential (H)
Rural Exclusive (RE-20) and Single-
Family Residential (R-1)
Church, Single-Family
Residences, and Vacant
Land
North Medium Industrial (I-2) Limited Industrial (M-2)
East Los Angeles
Avenue/SR 118 and
Industrial Uses
South
Open Space and
Recreation (OS-2) and
Floodway (FLDWY)
Open Space (OS) Arroyo Simi and Open
Space
Final Mitigated Negative Declaration for Beltramo Ranch Residential Project
Moorpark, Ventura County, California
Chambers Group, Inc.
21328
5
Table 1: Existing General Plan / Zoning/ Land Use
Direction General Plan Zoning Existing Land Use
East Very High Residential
(VH) and L
Residential Planned Development
(RPD-8.4U) Single-Family Residences
West H and P RPD-8.4U Single-Family Residences
The existing and proposed General Plan Land Use designations as well as the existing and proposed Zoning
designations are shown in Figure 4 and Figure 5, respectively.
2.3 PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The application includes a request for:
•General Plan Amendment (GPA);
•Zone Change (ZC) for a portion of the Project site;
•Development Agreement (DA);
•Vesting Tentative Tract Map (VTTM); and
•Residential Planned Development (RPD).
The Project includes the request for the construction of 47 single-family, detached residences and
programmed open space. The Proposed Project includes an application for a GPA land use designation
change for a portion of the 7.4 acres of land from P and L to H, as well as a ZC from R-1 and RE-20 to RPD-
7U.
The Proposed Project includes the construction of a total of 106,110 square feet of residential uses with
common area improvements and landscape buffers along the Project’s frontage and perimeter (see
Figure 2, below). The two-story homes will be three- and four-bedroom + loft homes that range in size
from approximately 2,002 square feet to approximately 2,477 square feet with three floor plan types.
The 47 single-family for-sale homes will all be two-story homes with two-car garages and standard
driveways, with the architectural theme of American Farmhouse and California Ranch. The total building
coverage of the site would be approximately 21 percent, with approximately 88,478 square feet of open
space comprising 37,921 square feet of private yards and 50,557 square feet of common open space
areas, as noted in Table 2, below and in Figure 2: Site Plan.
Table 2: Project Features
Feature Amount Notes
Residence and
Parking Information
47 Residential Units, 94 garage parking spaces, 94 driveway
parking spaces, 45 guest parking spaces
Two-story homes
with American
Farmhouse and
California Ranch
themes
Final Mitigated Negative Declaration for Beltramo Ranch Residential Project
Moorpark, Ventura County, California
Chambers Group, Inc.
21328
6
Feature Amount Notes
Earthwork Quantities 2,224 CY cut, 6,284 CY undercut, 10,435 CY fill, 626 CY shrinkage
(6%), 2,553 CY import
Site preparation
to occur prior to
earthwork
Landscape
Calculation
15,249 square feet of turf area, 19,405 square feet of
decomposed granite area and cobble area, 25,187 square feet of
front yard planting area, and 39,070 square feet of other public
planting area
Total permeable
area of 98,911
square feet; no
existing trees to
be preserved on
the site
Open Space
Component
Open spaces set aside in the southern “panhandle” area of the
site and green spaces along the perimeter of the residential
development
Includes passive
seating areas,
picnic areas,
fields, and trails
Open Space Areas
The Project includes sidewalk pathways throughout the residential portion of the project along with a
privately maintained park with both passive and active community amenities including passive seating
areas, barbecue area, picnic tables, pocket parks with grass fields, and walking/biking paths. The open
space area is proposed to be nearly 1 acre in size, located in the southern panhandle section of the site,
and is intended to promote walkability and provide community gathering spaces. An existing pedestrian
fence opening would also remain to allow access from the project open space area to Glenwood Park for
public benefit. A small pocket park is proposed at the north entrance and includes a seating area. In
addition to the open space area, landscaping will be provided along the perimeter of the residential
development.
Parking
The proposed development plan provides for a total of 233 parking spaces. This includes 94 residential
spaces located within private garages, 94 spaces within driveways, and 45 uncovered on-street parallel
parking spaces along the outer loop street. This equates to approximately five parking spaces per home.
Project parking is consistent with City parking code requirements (MMC 17.32.020) by providing the
required 94 spaces. The Project would provide 139 parking spaces over and above the code requirements.
Perimeter Walls, Fencing, and Landscaping
An existing block wall along the western property line will remain in place. A new 6-foot-tall white vinyl
fence is proposed to be constructed along the western side of the residential portion of the project site,
along the existing block wall. A three-foot, 6-inch two-rail split rail white vinyl fence would be installed
along the western and eastern side of the open space panhandle and the southern property line. An eight-
foot split face block wall is proposed for the northern property line along the entry and the eastern and
southern of the residential portion of the project. Landscape screening is proposed along walls and fences
along the loop road and along the Los Angeles Avenue frontage.
Final Mitigated Negative Declaration for Beltramo Ranch Residential Project
Moorpark, Ventura County, California
Chambers Group, Inc.
21328
7
Landscaping
The proposed plant palette is compliant with the City’s Landscape Design Standards and Guidelines and
Ventura County Fire Department’s prohibited plant species list near structures. Native and drought-
tolerant species will be predominant throughout the new development. The plant palette consists of non-
invasive plants with low to medium water use and is compliant with the State Model Water Efficiency
Landscape Ordinance (see Figure 3: Landscape Plan, below). The proposed turf area is minimal and will be
limited to the active field areas in the panhandle. A smart weather-based irrigation controller will be
installed to manage water use, and common area landscaping will be maintained by the Homeowner’s
Association (HOA). No reclaimed water lines are in place nearby to extend to the site. Landscaped and
permeable areas make up 98,911 square feet of the site. Permeable areas include turf, decomposed
granite and cobble areas, front yards, and general use areas.
The Beltramo Ranch onsite amenities, including recreational and open space opportunities, will be
maintained by the project HOA but available for use by the surrounding neighborhoods and community.
Figure 2Beltramo RanchSite Plan
Name: 21328 PLAN Fig 2 Site Plan.MxdPrint Date: 2/24/2021 2:56:47 PM Author: pcarlos
Final Mitigated Negative Declaration for Beltramo Ranch Residential Project
Moorpark, Ventura County, California
Chambers Group, Inc.
21328
8
Figure 2: Site Plan
Figure 3Beltramo RanchLandscape Plan
Name: 21328 PLAN Fig 3 Landscape Plan.MxdPrint Date: 3/24/2022 11:40:10 AM Author: pcarlos
NOT TO SCALE
Final Mitigated Negative Declaration for Beltramo Ranch Residential Project
Moorpark, Ventura County, California
Chambers Group, Inc.
21328
9
Figure 3:- Landscape Plan
Final Mitigated Negative Declaration for Beltramo Ranch Residential Project
Moorpark, Ventura County, California
Chambers Group, Inc.
21328
10
2.3.1 Construction
Construction of the Project is expected to begin in early 2023 and continue for an estimated 25 months.
Site preparation is anticipated to take two months, grading to take four months, and vertical construction
to occur over 19 months starting with the model homes and continuing with four additional overlapping
phases. Project buildout is expected to occur late 2024 or early 2025. Construction activities of the
Proposed Project will be scheduled in compliance with the City’s Municipal Code Title 17 for the provisions
of operating and permitting the use of tools and equipment during construction, drilling, repair, or
alterations.
Site preparation will include the removal of existing buildings and septic tanks, and clearing and grubbing.
The land development includes grading the site to create rough graded streets and pads for new
construction. The site preparation will include an estimated 8,000 cubic yards of cut and 10,000 cubic
yards of fill, with an import of approximately 2,500 cubic yards.
In addition to contractor vehicles, heavy equipment will be used on site which will include excavators,
backhoe, cranes, bulldozer, graders, compactors, and dump trucks. All equipment will be staged within
the Project. Easements will be required to address access through the site, including a Pacific Telephone
& Telegraph Company easement, multiple Southern California Edison Company easements, a Ventura
County Waterworks District (VCWWD) easement, a City of Moorpark easement, and multiple private
tenant easements. Easements are required for public utilities, ingress, egress, landscaping, and roadway
purposes.
HARVESTER STHEATHER CTBELTRAMO RANCH RDMAUREEN LNJUSTIN CTELDERBERRY AVLOS ANGELES AV
LORETTA DR
NIGHTINGALE ST
Figure 4Beltramo RanchCurrent and Proposed Land Use
Name: 21328 PLAN Fig 4 Current and Proposed Land Use.MxdPrint Date: 4/25/2022 11:33:40 AM Author: pcarlos
0 100 20050
Feet
´Proposed Land Use
High Density Residential (7 DU/AC)
Project Location
Current Landuse
FloodwayHigh Density Residential (7 DU/AC)
Low Density Residential (1 DU/AC)Open Space 2 (1 DU/40 AC)
Park
Final Mitigated Negative Declaration for Beltramo Ranch Residential Project
Moorpark, Ventura County, California
Chambers Group, Inc.
21328
11
Figure 4: Current and Proposed General Plan Land Use Designations
HARVESTER STHEATHER CTBELTRAMO RANCH RDMAUREEN LNJUSTIN CTELDERBERRY AVLOS ANGELES AV
LORETTA DR
NIGHTINGALE ST
Figure 5Beltramo RanchCurrent and Proposed Zoning
Name: 21328 PLAN Fig 5 Current and Proposed Zoning.MxdPrint Date: 4/25/2022 3:44:17 PM Author: pcarlos
0 100 20050
Feet
´Proposed Zoning
Residential Planned Development
Project Location
Current Zoning
One-Family Residential
Open Space
Residential Planned Development
Rural Exclusive
Single-Family Estate
Final Mitigated Negative Declaration for Beltramo Ranch Residential Project
Moorpark, Ventura County, California
Chambers Group, Inc.
21328
12
Figure 5: Current and Proposed Zoning Designations
Final Mitigated Negative Declaration for Beltramo Ranch Residential Project
Moorpark, Ventura County, California
Chambers Group, Inc.
21328
13
2.3.2 Site Development and Construction Measures
Based on a review of the geotechnical and subsurface conditions for the Project site, the following
measures will be taken during site development and construction to ensure that the Project design is
feasible:
All grading will be accomplished under the observation and testing of the project Geotechnical
Consultant in accordance with the recommendations contained in the Geotechnical Report
(Appendix E) and the City of Moorpark criteria.
Vegetation, construction debris, and other deleterious materials are unsuitable as structural fill
material and will be disposed of offsite prior to commencing grading/construction.
Any septic tanks, seepage pits, or wells will be abandoned as per the County of Ventura
Department of Health Services.
Existing concrete will be removed prior to the placement of engineered fill. The demolished
concrete may be incorporated into compacted, engineered fills after it is crushed to a maximum
size of 6 inches. Prior to placement as engineered fill, any protruding steel rebar will be cut from
the concrete pieces and disposed of offsite. The crushed asphalt will not be placed under
residential structures, but rather it will be placed in approved non-residential areas such as
streets, parking areas, or open space.
The upper 5 feet of existing soils will require removal and recompaction.
Footings for structures will be underlain by a minimum of 2 feet of compacted fill. For building
pads where unsuitable soil removals do not provide the minimum depth of compacted fill, or
where design grades and/or remedial grading activities create cut/fill transitions, the cut and fill
portions of the building pads will be over-excavated during grading and replaced with compacted
fill. The Project Geotechnical Consultant will observe the removal prior to placing fill.
All fill and processed natural ground will be compacted to a minimum relative compaction of
90 percent, as determined by ASTM Test Method: D-1557. Fill material should be moisture
conditioned to optimum moisture or above. Compaction will be achieved with the use of
sheepsfoot rollers or similar kneading type equipment. Mixing and moisture conditioning will be
required in order to achieve the recommended moisture conditions.
Structures onsite will be supported on a post-tensioned slab/foundation or mat slab system.
Upon the completion of rough grading, finish-grade samples will be collected and tested in order
to provide specific recommendations as they relate to the individual building pads. These test
results and corresponding design recommendations will be presented in a final rough grading
report. Final slab and foundation design recommendations will be made based upon specific
structure siting, loading conditions, and as-graded soil conditions.
A moisture and vapor retarding system will be placed below the slabs ongrade in portions of the
structure considered to be moisture sensitive and should be capable of effectively preventing the
migration of water and reducing the transmission of water vapor to acceptable levels.
Final Mitigated Negative Declaration for Beltramo Ranch Residential Project
Moorpark, Ventura County, California
Chambers Group, Inc.
21328
14
Block walls will be embedded a minimum of 2 feet below the lowest adjacent grade. Construction
joints (not more than 20 feet apart) will be included in the block wall construction. Side yard walls
will be structurally separated from the rear yard wall.
Retaining walls will be founded on engineered fill and will be backfilled with granular soils that
allow for drainage behind the wall. Retaining walls will be designed in general accordance with
Section 1807A.2 of the 2019 California Building Code (CBC).
Construction of the streets will be accomplished in accordance with the current criteria of the City
of Moorpark. Prior to the placement of base material, the subgrade will be suitably moisture
conditioned, processed, and compacted to a minimum 95 percent of the laboratory maximum
density (ASTM: D 1557) to at least 12 inches below subgrade. After subgrade compaction, the
exposed grade will then be “proof”-rolled with heavy equipment to ensure the grade does not
“pump” and is verified as nonyielding. Aggregate base material will be placed on the compacted
subgrade and compacted in-place to a minimum 95 percent of the laboratory standard obtained
per ASTM: D 1557.
Positive drainage away from the proposed structures will be provided and maintained. Roof, pad,
and lot drainage will be collected and directed away from the structures toward approved disposal
areas through drainage terraces, gutters, down drains, and other devices. Design fine grade
elevations will be maintained through the life of the structure; or, if design fine grade elevations
are altered, adequate area drains should be installed in order to provide rapid discharge of water,
away from structures.
2.3.3 Operations and Maintenance
The Project is proposed to be fully operational in 2025. Maintenance within the residential property will
be coordinated by the Beltramo Ranch HOA and will include ongoing landscaping, as well as improvements
to public spaces.
2.4 PERMITS AND AGREEMENTS
As required by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines, this section provides, to the
extent the information is known, a list of permits and other approvals required to implement the Project.
The following approvals and permits may be required for the Project:
▪ General Plan Amendment
▪ Zone Change for a portion of the Project site
▪ Vesting Tentative Tract Map
▪ Development Agreement
▪ Residential Planned Development
▪ Ventura County Fire Department
▪ Ventura County Waterworks District No. 1
▪ Caltrans Encroachment Permit
▪ City grading and building permits
Final Mitigated Negative Declaration for Beltramo Ranch Residential Project
Moorpark, Ventura County, California
Chambers Group, Inc.
21328
15
SECTION 3.0 – FINDINGS
An Initial Study has been prepared to assess the Proposed Project's potential impacts on the environment
and the significance of those impacts and was incorporated in the Draft MND. Based on this Initial Study,
it has been determined that the Proposed Project would not have any significant impacts on the
environment once all proposed mitigation measures have been implemented. This conclusion is
supported by the following findings:
No potential was found for adverse impacts on Agriculture & Forestry and Mineral Resources
associated with the Proposed Project.
Potential adverse impacts resulting from the Proposed Project were found to be less than
significant in the following areas: Aesthetics, Air Quality, Cultural Resources, Energy, Geology &
Soils, Greenhouse Gas Emissions, Hazards & Hazardous Materials, Hydrology & Water Quality,
Land Use & Planning, Noise, Population & Housing, Public Services, Recreation, Transportation,
Tribal Cultural Resources, Utilities & Service Systems, and Wildfire.
Full implementation of the proposed mitigation measures included in this MND would reduce
potential project-related adverse impact on Biological Resources and Mandatory Findings of
Significance to a less than significant level.
Final Mitigated Negative Declaration for Beltramo Ranch Residential Project
Moorpark, Ventura County, California
Chambers Group, Inc.
21328
16
SECTION 4.0 – MITIGATION MEASURES
The following mitigation measures and project conditions have been incorporated into the scope of work
for the Proposed Project and will be fully implemented by the City of Moorpark to avoid or minimize
adverse environmental impacts identified in this MND. These mitigation measures will be included in the
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP) prepared for this project.
Mitigation Measure MM BIO-1: A nesting bird pre-construction survey will be conducted by a
Qualified Biologist and submitted to the City three days prior to demolition and/or vegetation
removal activities during nesting bird season (February 15 through August 31) within 250 feet of
the Project site for passerines and 500 feet for raptors and/or listed species, where feasible.
Should nesting birds be found, an exclusionary buffer will be established by a Qualified Biologist.
The buffer may be up to 500 feet in diameter depending on the species of nesting bird found. This
buffer will be clearly marked in the field by construction personnel under guidance of the
Qualified Biologist, and construction or clearing will not be conducted within this zone until the
Qualified Biologist determines that the young have fledged or the nest is no longer active. Nesting
bird habitat within the Project site will be resurveyed during bird breeding season if a lapse in
construction activities lasts longer than seven days.
COA CUL-1 If any archeological or historical finds are uncovered during grading or excavation
operations, all grading or excavation shall immediately cease in the immediate area and the find
must be left untouched. The applicant, in consultation with the project paleontologist or
archeologist, shall assure the preservation of the site and immediately contact the Community
Development Director by phone, in writing by email or hand delivered correspondence informing
the Director of the find. In the absence of the Director, ·the applicant shall so inform the City
Manager. The applicant shall be required to obtain the services of a qualified paleontologist or
archeologist, whichever is appropriate to recommend disposition of the site. The paleontologist
or archeologist selected must be approved in writing by the Community Development Director.
The applicant shall pay for all costs associated with the investigation and disposition of the find.
COA TCR-1 In the event that Project site excavation and construction activities expose tribal cultural
resources (i.e., sites, features, or artifacts) encountered during construction activities for the
Project, the temporary halting of construction activities near the encounter and notification of
the City and any Native American tribes traditionally and culturally affiliated with the geographic
area of the Project would be required. If the City determines that the potential resource appears
to be a tribal cultural resource (as defined by PRC Section 21074), the City will provide any affected
tribe a reasonable period of time to conduct a site visit and make recommendations regarding the
monitoring of future ground disturbance activities, as well as the treatment and disposition of any
discovered tribal cultural resources. The Applicant will then implement the tribe’s
recommendations if a qualified archaeologist reasonably concludes that the tribe’s
recommendations are reasonable and feasible. The recommendations would then be
incorporated into a tribal cultural resource monitoring plan; and, once the plan is approved by
the City, ground disturbance activities could resume. In accordance with this mitigation which
shall become a condition of approval, all activities would be conducted in accordance with
regulatory requirements.
Final Mitigated Negative Declaration for Beltramo Ranch Residential Project
Moorpark, Ventura County, California
Chambers Group, Inc.
21328
17
SECTION 5.0 – CIRCULATION
On May 13, 2022, the City of Moorpark circulated a Notice of Intent to Adopt a Mitigated Negative
Declaration to responsible agencies, trustee agencies, interest groups, and the general public. In
accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Section 21091 and State CEQA
Guidelines Section 15073, a 30-day public review period for the Final IS/MND was provided from May
13, 2022 to June 13, 2022. Copies of the Draft Initial Study/ Mitigated Negative Declaration and
supporting materials were made available for review at the Development and Community Services
Building, City Hall, 799 Moorpark Avenue, Moorpark, California, 93021, Moorpark Library, 699
Moorpark Avenue, Moorpark California, 93021 and online at
www.moorparkca.gov/568/Environmental-Documents.
During the 30-day comment period, the following comments were received from the following agencies.
Comment Letter No. Commenting Agency Date of Comment
1 California Department of Transportation District 7
(Caltrans)
June 10, 2022
2 Ventura County Air Pollution Control District June 13, 2022
3 Ventura County Public Works, Groundwater June 13, 2022
4 Ventura County Public Works, Water and Sanitation June 14, 2022
In addition, during the 30-day comment period, the follow comments on the Draft MND were received
from members of the public.
Comment Letter No. Commenter Date of Comment
5 Patty Martin June 13, 2022
Final Mitigated Negative Declaration for Beltramo Ranch Residential Project
Moorpark, Ventura County, California
Chambers Group, Inc.
21328
18
SECTION 6.0 – RESPONSE TO COMMENTS
CEQA Guidelines Section 15204 (b) outlines parameters for submitting comments and reminds persons
and public agencies that the focus of review and comment of negative declarations should be, “on the
proposed finding that the project will not have a significant effect on the environment. If persons and
public agencies believe that the project may have a significant effect, they should: (1) Identify the specific
effect; (2) Explain why they believe the effect would occur, and; (3) Explain why they believe the effect
would be significant.”
CEQA Guidelines Section 15204 (c) further advises, “Reviewers should explain the basis for their
comments, and should submit data or references offering facts, reasonable assumptions based on facts,
or expert opinion supported by facts in support of the comments. Pursuant to Section 15064, an effect
shall not be considered significant in the absence of substantial evidence.” Section 15204 (d) also states,
“Each responsible agency and trustee agency shall focus its comments on environmental information
germane to that agency’s statutory responsibility.” Section 15204 (e) states, “This section shall not be
used to restrict the ability of reviewers to comment on the general adequacy of a document or of the lead
agency to reject comments not focused as recommended by this section.”
In accordance with Public Resources Code 21092.5 (b) of the CEQA Guidelines, the lead agency shall notify
any public agency which comments on a negative declaration of the public hearing or hearings, if any, on
the project for which the negative declaration was prepared. If notice to the commenting public agency
is provided pursuant to Section 21092, the notice shall satisfy the requirement of this subdivision.
“Provide a safe and reliable transportation network that serves all people and respects the environment”
STATE OF CALIFORNIA------- CALIFORNIA STATE TRANSPORTATION AGENCY GAVIN NEWSOM, Governor
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
DISTRICT 7
100 S. MAIN STREET, MS 16
LOS ANGELES, CA 90012
PHONE (213) 269-1124
FAX (213) 897-1337
TTY 711
www.dot.ca.gov
Making Conservation
a California Way of Life
June 10, 2022
Shanna Farley, Principal Planner
City of Moorpark
799 Moorpark Avenue
Moorpark, CA 93021
RE: Beltramo Ranch Residential Project
SCH # 2022050309
Vic. LA-14/PM R69.99
GTS # LA-2022-03864-MND
Dear Shanna Farley:
Thank you for including the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) in the
environmental review process for the above referenced environmental document. The
Project includes the request for the construction of 47 single-family, detached residences and
programmed open space. The existing single-family homes and church are proposed to be
demolished as part of the Proposed Project construction. The Proposed Project includes the
construction of a total of 106,110 square feet of residential uses with common area improvements
and landscape buffers along the Project’s frontage and perimeter.
The mission of Caltrans is to provide a safe and reliable transportation network that serves
all people and respects the environment. Senate Bill 743 (2013) has codified into CEQA
law and mandated that CEQA review of transportation impacts of proposed development
be modified by using Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) as the primary metric in identifying
transportation impacts for all future development projects. You may reference the
Governor’s Office of Planning and Research (OPR) for more information:
http://opr.ca.gov/ceqa/updates/guidelines/
As a reminder, VMT is the standard transportation analysis metric in CEQA for land use
projects after July 1, 2020, which is the statewide implementation date.
Caltrans is aware of challenges that the region faces in identifying viable solutions to
alleviating congestion on State and Local facilities. With limited room to expand vehicular
capacity, all future developments should incorporate multi-modal and complete streets
Comment Letter 1 - Caltrans
Comment
1-1
Final Mitigated Negative Declaration for Beltramo Ranch Residential Project
Moorpark, Ventura County, California
Chambers Group, Inc.
21328
19
Comment Letter #1 – Caltrans
Shanna Farley
June 10, 2022
Page 2 of 3
“Provide a safe and reliable transportation network that serves all people and respects the environment”
transportation elements that will actively promote alternatives to car use and better
manage existing parking assets. Prioritizing and allocating space to efficient modes of
travel such as bicycling and public transit can allow streets to transport more people in a
fixed amount of right-of-way.
Caltrans supports the implementation of complete streets and pedestri an safety
measures such as road diets and other traffic calming measures. Please note the Federal
Highway Administration (FHWA) recognizes the road diet treatment as a proven safety
countermeasure, and the cost of a road diet can be significantly reduced if implemented
in tandem with routine street resurfacing. Overall, the environmental report should ensure
all modes are served well by planning and development activities. This includes reducing
single occupancy vehicle trips, ensuring safety, reducing vehicle miles traveled,
supporting accessibility, and reducing greenhouse gas emissions.
Caltrans’ comments is based on the Revised Traffic and Circulation Study, prepared on
June 1, 2022. This study should be incorporated and updated in the MND Appendix I
accordingly before MND approval.
Based on the Ventura County Transportation Model (VCTM), the TCS utilized data for the
various Traffic Analysis Zones (TAZs) that are contiguous to the Project site. The TAZ-
level daily VMT per capita for the Project was determined to be 17.26 miles per capita.
The 17.26 impact threshold was determined as it is 15% below the Citywide average of
20.31. The Citywide average daily VMT per capita was determined to be 20.31 miles.
The Project’s estimated VMT was determined to be 16.93 miles per capita. Impacts
regarding Project VMT would therefore be less than significant.
A queue analysis was conducted to determine if there is adequate spacing between the
adjacent intersection for left and right turn movement at the Los Angeles Avenue and
nearby intersections/Driveway. The queuing analysis found that there is insufficient
storage space for the eastbound left-turn movement at Los Angeles Avenue/Maureen
Lane Intersection during the AM peak hour period. The left-turn lane should be extended
by restriping it to provide 145 feet of left-turn storage to accommodate the left-turn
movement. The existing storage provided for right-turns was determined to be sufficient.
Please be reminded that any work performed within the State Right-of-way will require an
Encroachment Permit from Caltrans. Any modifications to State facilities must meet all
mandatory design standard and specifications.
As a reminder, any transportation of heavy construction equipment and/or materials which
requires use of oversized-transport vehicles on State highways will need a Caltrans
transportation permit. We recommend large size truck trips be limited to off-peak
commute periods.
Comment
1-1
continued
Comment 1-2
Comment 1-3
Comment 1-4
Comment 1-5
Comment 1-6
Final Mitigated Negative Declaration for Beltramo Ranch Residential Project
Moorpark, Ventura County, California
Chambers Group, Inc.
21328
20
Shanna Farley
June 10, 2022
Page 3 of 3
“Provide a safe and reliable transportation network that serves all people and respects the environment”
In addition, as you are aware of, the State Route 118 (SR-118) is listed under the
California Freeway and Expressway System and considered an access controlled
highway. Roadway modification will need to adhere to expressway standards in the
future. An expressway agreement between the Lead Agency and Caltrans should be
implemented to show where the access points to SR-118 are allowed.
If you have any questions, please feel free to contact Mr. Alan Lin the project coordinator
at (213) 269-1124 and refer to GTS # VEN-2022-00487-MND.
Sincerely,
MIYA EDMONSON
LDR/CEQA Branch Chief
email: State Clearinghouse
Comment
1-7
Final Mitigated Negative Declaration for Beltramo Ranch Residential Project
Moorpark, Ventura County, California
Chambers Group, Inc.
21328
21
Final Mitigated Negative Declaration for Beltramo Ranch Residential Project
Moorpark, Ventura County, California
Chambers Group, Inc.
21328
22
RESPONSE TO COMMENT LETTER 1 – CALTRANS
Response to Comment 1-1:
This comment provides a summary of the Project description and Caltrans policies, including a reminder
that VMT is the standard transportation analysis metric in CEQA. These comments are noted and will be
taken into consideration with the Project approvals. VMT analysis was conducted as part of the Project
analysis and is included in Appendix I – Traffic Report.
Response to Comment 1-2:
The comment references the Revised Traffic and Circulation Study prepared on June 1, 2022. This revised
study has been incorporated into this Final MND as is appended. In addition, revisions to traffic analysis
contained in the MND is provided in Section 7.0 Revisions to the Draft Mitigated Negative Declaration,
below.
Response to Comment 1-3:
The comment summarizes the VMT analysis conducted for the Project and concurs that impacts regarding
VMT would be less than significant. No further response is required.
Response to Comment 1-4:
This comment summarizes the queue analysis conducted for the left and right turn movement at the Los
Angeles Avenue and nearby intersections/driveway. As noted in Section 1.2.3, Site Access and Circulation,
the Project will restripe Los Angeles Avenue at the Beltramo Ranch Road and Maureen Lane intersections
to provide left-turn pockets of sufficient length to the satisfaction of Caltrans and the City of Moorpark.
In addition, the Revised Traffic and Circulation Study prepared on June 1, 2022 (Appendix I) does reference
the need to restripe the left-turn lane to provide 145 feet of left-turn storage in order to accommodate
left-turn movement.
Response to Comment 1-5:
The comment notes that any work performed within the State Right-of-Way will require an Encroachment
Permit from Caltrans. As noted in Section 1.4 Permits and Agreements, the Project will be obtaining a
Caltrans Encroachment Permit.
Response to Comment 1-6:
The comment provides a reminder that any transportation of heavy construction equipment and/or
materials which requires use of oversized-transport vehicles on State highways will need a Caltrans
transportation permit. In addition, Caltrans notes that large size truck trips are recommended to be
limited to off-peak commute periods. This comment is noted, and the applicant will comply with all
Caltrans policies and permits required.
Response to Comment 1-7:
Final Mitigated Negative Declaration for Beltramo Ranch Residential Project
Moorpark, Ventura County, California
Chambers Group, Inc.
21328
23
The comment states that State Route 118 (SR-118) is listed under the California Freeway and Expressway
System and is considered an access controlled highway. As noted in the comment, as expressway
agreement between the City of Moorpark and Caltrans will be implemented to show where the access
points to SR-118 are allowed.
VENTURA COUNTY
AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT
Memorandum
TO: Shanna Farley, Principal Planner, City of Moorpark
DATE: June 10, 2022
FROM: Nicole Collazo, Air Quality Specialist, Planning Division
SUBJECT: Draft Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Beltramo Ranch Project (RMA 22-
011)
Air Pollution Control District (APCD) staff have reviewed the subject mitigated negative
declaration (MND) of the Beltramo Ranch project (project). The project proposes to develop 47
single-family detached residences and associated open space. The project is located at 11930 Los
Angeles Avenue at the southeast corner of Los Angeles Avenue and Beltramo Ranch Road. The
Lead Agency is the City of Moorpark.
GENERAL COMMENTS
Air Quality Section
Item 1) Page 24. Table 4. We note that the reactive organic compounds (ROC/VOC) emissions
estimated for the architectural coatings phase of the construction may be an overestimation, as the
default setting used in CalEEMod Version 2020.4.0 for architectural coatings is 100 g/L ROC
maximum. APCD recently amended Rule 74.2, Architectural Coatings, in July 2021, to lower the
maximum ROC content of flat architectural coatings to 50 g/L. This will not impact the
significance determination for regional air quality impacts.
Item 2) Page 25. Criteria c. The impact analysis for exposing sensitive receptors to pollutants
should include the potential of asbestos exposure from the proposed demolition activities. We
remind the applicant that the demolition activities must be in compliance with APCD Rule 62.7,
Asbestos- Demolition and Renovation. This includes meeting the notification requirements to
APCD and emission control requirements in Rule 62.7.C.1.
Item 3) Appendix C (Emission Reduction and Dust Control BMP Measures) to Appendix A (Air
Quality/Greenhouse Gas Emissions Impact Analysis) PDF Page 262 of 2139 of MND. We
recommend changing language in Item 5 of the emission reduction measures from:
“5) Per VCAPCD recommendations, construction activities should utilize new
technologies to control ozone precursor emissions as they become available and
feasible”, to:
Comment Letter #2
Comment 2-1
Comment 2-2
Comment 2-3
Comment 2-4
Final Mitigated Negative Declaration for Beltramo Ranch Residential Project
Moorpark, Ventura County, California
Chambers Group, Inc.
21328
24
Comment Letter #2 – Ventura County Air Pollution Control District
“5) Per VCAPCD recommendations, off-road construction equipment shall be
minimum Tier 3 EPA rating for diesel engines or Tier 4, if commercially
available, to reduce ozone precursor emissions”
The construction schedule is expected to last well over 6 months (+1.5 years). The exposure of
toxics, such as diesel particulate matter and nitrous oxides, from daily use of construction
equipment to any sensitive receptors residing nearby the construction site (Glenwood Park,
Moorpark Healthcare Center, residences, Moorpark High School, Arroyo Vista Community Park),
may have a health impact, with emphasis on infants age 0-2 years of age which have higher
breathing rates and are more susceptible to exposure of air pollutants.
Greenhouse Gas Emissions Section
Item 1) Criteria b. We recommend, at a minimum, a cite or reference specifically within the criteria
b section, to the Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Impact Analysis study of March 22
included in Appendix A of the MND, which contains a robust quantitative analysis of the project’s
consistency with the State Climate Change 2017 Scoping Plan, including a table listing how the
project meets each criterion, in order to inform the public adequately and in detail how the project
is in conformance with an applicable GHG reduction plan, per CEQA Guidelines Appendix G,
Environmental Checklist.
Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the project’s MND. If you have any questions, you
may contact me at nicole@vcapcd.org.
Comment 2-4
continued
Comment 2-6
Comment 2-5
Final Mitigated Negative Declaration for Beltramo Ranch Residential Project
Moorpark, Ventura County, California
Chambers Group, Inc.
21328
25
Final Mitigated Negative Declaration for Beltramo Ranch Residential Project
Moorpark, Ventura County, California
Chambers Group, Inc.
21328
26
RESPONSE TO COMMENT LETTER 2 – Ventura County Air Pollution Control District
Response to Comment 2-1:
This comment provides a summary of the Project description; no further response is required.
Response to Comment 2-2:
The comment notes that the estimated emissions for reactive organic compounds (ROC/VOC) for the
architectural coating phase may be an overestimation; however, that his would not impact the
significance determination of the regional air quality impacts. The City notes the potential over estimation
in emissions; the worst-case scenario is provided and impacts are still less than significant.
Response to Comment 2-3:
The comment notes the potential to expose sensitive receptors to asbestos during demolition activities.
As noted in Section 7.0, below, the Air Quality section for criteria c has been revised to include the Air
Pollution Control District rules regarding asbestos.
Response to Comment 2-4:
This comment recommends changing the language for emissions reduction measures. This language was
listed in Appendix C to Appendix A (Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Impact Analysis). The Applicant will
be required to incorporate construction-related best management practices (BMPs) as feasible, per
VCAPCD recommendations The language has been amended and is included as Appendix A.
Response to Comment 2-5:
The comment notes that, due to the construction schedule, sensitive receptors may have a health impact.
As noted in Section 4.3, Air Quality, under Construction-Related TAC Emissions, “The Project would comply
with the CARB Air Toxics Control Measure that limits diesel-powered equipment and vehicle idling to no
more than five minutes at a location and the CARB In-Use Off-Road Diesel Vehicle Regulation; compliance
with these would minimize emissions of TACs during construction.” Therefore, with compliance with CARB
and APCD measures, impacts to sensitive receptors are considered less than significant.
Response to Comment 2-6:
This comment recommends citing or referencing the Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Impact
Analysis in Section 4.8 Greenhouse Gas Emissions. This analysis is referenced at the beginning of Section
4.8 in the Environmental Setting. In addition, Table 6B has been included below, in Section 7.0, to
summarize the Project’s consistency with CARB Scoping Plan Policies and Measures.
PUBLIC
VENTURA COUNTfiWORKS
DATE: May 26, 2022
WATERSHED PROTECTION
MEMORANDUM
TO: Anthony Ciuffetelli, Planner, Planning Division
FROM:
SUBJECT:
James Maxwell, Groundwater Specialist, Water Resources Division �
RMA 22-011 -Beltramo Ranch Residential Project
The Ventura County Public Works Agency -Watershed Protection, Water Resources
Division, Groundwater Resources Section (GRS) reviewed the Draft Initial Study
Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Beltramo Ranch Residential Project (Draft)
submitted by the City of Moorpark.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The proposed development (Project) is located at 11930 Los Angeles Avenue in the City
of Moorpark, at the southeast corner of Los Angeles Avenue and Beltramo Ranch Road,
on Assessor's Parcel Numbers (APNs) 504-0-021-195, 506-0-030-210, -220, -235, -045,
and -055. The 7.4-acre site currently consists of developed and undeveloped land. The
project would involve demolishing the existing structures. And the construction of
approximately 47 single-family, detached residences and programmed open space,
totaling 106,110 square-feet (SF) of residential uses.
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS
The Site overlies the Las Posas Valley Basin, a Department of Water Resources (DWR)
designated high priority basin identified as Basin No. 4-019. The Las Posas Valley Basin
is hydrogeologically connected to the Oxnard Subbasin and the Pleasant Balley Basin,
both critically-overdrafted. The proposed project is located within the Fox Canyon
Groundwater Management Agency (FCGMA) boundaries. The FCGMA regulates
groundwater extraction allocations for well owners and operators within its boundaries.
County records do not show any groundwater wells located within the Project parcels.
Wells discovered during grading and construction activities and not classified as
"destroyed" and that will not be used by the Project or considered as "active" status will
need to be permitted for destruction per the County per Ventura County Ordinance No.
4468 (Well Ordinance). No new groundwater extraction wells are proposed by the Project.
Ventura County Waterworks District No. 1 (VCWWD-1) will provide water service to the
Project. The VCWWD-1 water supply consists primarily of imported State Water Project
(SWP) water from Calleguas Municipal Water District (CMWD) and groundwater
extracted from VCWWD-1 wells in the East Las Posas Management Area. Using the 2020
Comment Letter #3
Comment
3-1
Comment
3-2
Comment
3-3
Final Mitigated Negative Declaration for Beltramo Ranch Residential Project
Moorpark, Ventura County, California
Chambers Group, Inc.
21328
27
Comment Letter #3 – Ventura County Public Works, Groundwater Resources Section
Project Review RMA 22-011
May 26, 2022
Page 2 of 3
Urban Water Management Plan for Ventura County Waterworks Distict No. 1, the
Project's annual residential water consumption was calculated to be approximately 32.6
acre-feet per year (AFY), which is 1.4o/o of the FCGMA groundwater allocation to
VC\ M/D-1 in 2020. The Draft identifies the Groundwater Sustainability Plan (GSP) for
the Las Posas Valley Basin as the 2007 Update to the Fox Canyon Groundwater
Management Agency Groundwater Management Plan. The Draft should be revised to
include and reference the 2019 DWR-accepted Groundwater Sustainability Plan for the
Las Posas Valley Basin.
The SewerArea Study dated June 2021 was provided by United Civil lnc. and included
in Appendix J. The Study reports that sanitary sewer service is provided by Ventura
County Water and Sanitation. Wastewater service in VC\AM/D-1 consists of wastewater
flows conveyed to the Moorpark Water Reclamation Facility (MWRF). The MWRF
receives an average of 2.0 million gallons per day (mgd) or 2,206-AFY and is designed
to treat 5 mgd. The MWRF has an available surplus capacity of 3.0 mgd or 3,360-AFY.
The Project residential operations would generate approximately 33.1-AFY of
wastewater.
The Project would increase the amount of onsite runoff, due to a total increase in
impervious surface area of 106,307-SF. A catch basin will be installed and a storm drain
system will convey runoff to an underground infiltration system and on grade detention
basin. Overflow water from the detention basin would follow existing drainage patterns
into Arroyo Simi. The Preliminary Hydrology and Post Construction Stormwater Quality
Repoft dated June 2021 and prepared by United Civil lnc. was included in Appendix G of
the Draft. United Civil also prepared the Hydrology Study, dated September 2021. The
Study concluded that the retention/detention system and infiltration trench with
pretreatment measures would capture and convey 100-year peak flow.
There will be a total permeable area of 98,91 1-SF including turf, decomposed granite and
cobble areas. The proposed Project would require approximately 2,553 cubic yards of
imported fill material. To minimize potential leaching of contaminants from new soils to
the underlying aquifers, imported fillshould be screened and assessed priorto placement.
The Department of Toxic Substance Control's (DTSC's) October 2001 Clean lmported
Fill Material lnformation Advisory guidelines are commonly used for this purpose.
ITEMS TO BE ADDRESSED
The following items need to be reviewed, revised and/or updated:
1. Provide a Will Serve Letterfrom VCW\A/D-1 confirming thatthe District can provide
the required water for the Project, at full build-out.
2. Revise the Draft to incorporate and/or reference the 2019 DWR-accepted GSP for
the Las Posas Valley Basin.
3. Provide an assessment of the annual loss of water recharging the underlying
aquifers from the proposed new impervious surfaces. Discuss how the infiltration
Comment
3-3
continued
Comment
3-4
Comment
3-5
Comment
3-6
Final Mitigated Negative Declaration for Beltramo Ranch Residential Project
Moorpark, Ventura County, California
Chambers Group, Inc.
21328
28
Project Review RMA 22-011
May 26, 2022
Page 3 of 3
mitigations reduce losses and/or facilitate percolation of surface water to
groundwater.
4. Excavation and placement of engineered fillare planned forthe Site. Any imported
fill will need to be screened using the DTSC October 2001 Clean lmported Fill
Material lnformation Advisory guidelines to prevent leaching of potential
contaminants.
5. lf groundwater wells are encountered during grading or construction, the well(s)
will need to be permitted with the County for destruction or returned to "active"
status, per the Count Well Ordinance.
Comment 3-6
continued
Final Mitigated Negative Declaration for Beltramo Ranch Residential Project
Moorpark, Ventura County, California
Chambers Group, Inc.
21328
29
Final Mitigated Negative Declaration for Beltramo Ranch Residential Project
Moorpark, Ventura County, California
Chambers Group, Inc.
21328
30
RESPONSE TO COMMENT LETTER 3 – VCPW, GROUNDWATER RESOURCES SECTION
Response to Comment 3-1:
This comment notes Ventura County Public Works Agency – Watershed Protection, Water Resources
Division, Groundwater Resources Section (GRS) review of the Draft IS/MND for the Project, and provides
a summary of the Project description. No further response is required.
Response to Comment 3-2:
The City appreciates the summary of the hydrology provided in the comment. Any groundwater wells
discovered during grading and construction activities would not be used by the Project. In addition, no
groundwater extraction wells are proposed by the Project.
Response to Comment 3-3:
Please refer to Section 7.0, below, where the Hydrology & Water Quality discussion has been updated to
reference the DWR-accepted Groundwater Sustainability Plan for the Las Posas Valley Basin.
Response to Comment 3-4:
This comment summarizes the Sewer Area Study included as Appendix J to the Draft IS/MND, and states
the capacity for the Moorpark Water Reclamation Facility. No further response is required.
Response to Comment 3-5:
The comment notes that the Project would increase site runoff due to the increase in impervious surfaces,
and notes the catch basin and storm drain system that will be installed. As noted in the comment, in order
to minimize potential leaching of contaminants from new soils into the underlying aquifers, any imported
soil will be screened and assessed prior to placement.
Response to Comment 3-6:
The Applicant will obtain a Will Serve letter from VCWWD1 prior to permitting of any construction, as a
condition of approval.
As noted in Comment 3-3, above, revisions to the Draft MND have been made in Section 7.0.
The infiltration basin is capturing all excess water that is being created by the additional impervious
surfaces, so there should be no annual loss of water recharging. As noted in Section 4.10, Hydrology &
Water Quality,” a catch basin will be installed at the site; and a storm drain system will convey runoff to
one of the underground infiltration system and on grade detention basin. The function of the underground
infiltration system is to return the stormwater to the groundwater and the detention basin reduces the
volume and velocity of stormwater runoff so that the completed Project will not increase the runoff from
the current existing conditions.” Therefore, the Project will not divert groundwater from the aquifer or
impact the groundwater basin’s integrity.
Final Mitigated Negative Declaration for Beltramo Ranch Residential Project
Moorpark, Ventura County, California
Chambers Group, Inc.
21328
31
As noted in Response to Comment 3-5, above, imported soils will be screened and assessed prior to
placement.
As noted in Response to Comment 3-2, any groundwater wells discovered during grading and construction
activities would not be used by the Project
From: Bandagski, Amy <Amy.Bandagski@ventura.org>
Sent: Wednesday, June 15, 2022 9:23 AM
To: Shanna Farley <SFarley@moorparkca.gov>
Subject: RE: Conditions Requested for Beltramo Ranch Project
Hi Shanna,
Per our recent communications, previously sent comments will be included as part of the conditions of
approval. As such, the only comment Water & Sanitation has for the MND is the following:
•Section 4.19.1: The description of the water connection does not include the second connection
within Beltramo Ranch Road. Previously conditions were issued to ensure two points of
connection to maintain a looped system.
Regards,
Amy Bandagski, EIT
Engineering Tech III
Water and Sanitation
6767 Spring Road / #6000
Moorpark, CA 93020
P: 805.378.3023
VCPWA Online | Facebook | Twitter
Comment Letter #4
Comment 4-1
Final Mitigated Negative Declaration for Beltramo Ranch Residential Project
Moorpark, Ventura County, California
Chambers Group, Inc.
21328
32
Comment Letter #4 – Ventura County Public Works, Water and Sanitation
Final Mitigated Negative Declaration for Beltramo Ranch Residential Project
Moorpark, Ventura County, California
Chambers Group, Inc.
21328
33
RESPONSE TO COMMENT LETTER 4 – VCPW, WATER AND SANITATION
Response to Comment 4-1:
This comment notes that the description is missing the second water connection within Beltramo Ranch
Road. Please see Section 7.0, below, where this information has been revised.
From:Shanna FarleyTo:Meghan GibsonSubject:FW: Beltramo projectDate:Monday, June 13, 2022 11:33:14 AM
Hi Meghan,
Please note that there are some items suggested related to bio and traffic. Please include as appropriate.
Shanna Farley
Principal Planner
Community Development Department
City of Moorpark | 799 Moorpark Ave. | Moorpark, CA 93021
(805) 517-6236 |sfarley@moorparkca.gov
www.moorparkca.gov
-----Original Message-----
From: Patty Martin <pattymartin4846@sbcglobal.net>
Sent: Monday, June 13, 2022 11:17 AM
To: Shanna Farley <SFarley@moorparkca.gov>
Subject: Beltramo project
Hello Ms Farley
My name is Patty Martin, I reside with my husband Dan Martin at 4706 Maureen Ln.
We have several concerns with this project:
1st: on the map it’s hard to see an access road from our back property since that is where I have my horse trailer, my
husbands trailer and where we load and unload our horses, dirt and other amenities that we access that back road.
You show a park but hard to view whether there is an access road.
2nd: the property is for low density for a reason, that is to keep what wild life we have there like the pair of road
runners and their chicks. Not a fan of this but we have the legless lizard which I think is protected. You change that
to high density it will change the aspect of the wildlife.
3rd: the amount of homes, plus with the hitch situation is going to cause high traffic with double the amount of
automobiles. Still not a good thing.
My beef is that you all seem to want more homes people that our little town is already overcrowded…sorry, I do not
think we want to look like Simi Valley. Plus with the amount of businesses that You all scare with the prices
charged, is crazy! Look at our town, right now it doesn’t compare to like Calabasas, Santa Barbara with the shops
that they have, we need. I see some residents trying to have small businesses but what the city does is scare the
Bageebees out of everyone and they can’t pay the prices.
Help our town be what it should have when the Apricot’s Farm wanted to come in. Take care of our in-town first
with businesses that can stay and be productive.
Thank you
Patty Martin
Sent from my iPhone
Comment Letter #5
Comment 5-1
Comment 5-2
Comment 5-3
Comment 5-4
Final Mitigated Negative Declaration for Beltramo Ranch Residential Project
Moorpark, Ventura County, California
Chambers Group, Inc.
21328
34
Comment Letter #5 – Patty Martin
Final Mitigated Negative Declaration for Beltramo Ranch Residential Project
Moorpark, Ventura County, California
Chambers Group, Inc.
21328
35
RESPONSE TO COMMENT LETTER 5 – PATTY MARTIN
Response to Comment 5-1:
The commenter mentions they had difficulty seeing where the access road is located on the site plan
figure. As shown more clearly in Figure 3, and discussed in Section 1.2.3, a vehicular gate will be installed
at the western terminus of Loretta Drive for emergency access and private access for Loretta Drive
residents only. This access road will also provide access to Maureen Lane.
Response to Comment 5-2:
The commenter mentions that wildlife is present near the property; however, as noted in Appendix B, no
portion of the property is occupied by natural habitat. In addition, no legless lizards were found onsite or
found to occur within or within a quarter-mile of the Project site. The only reptiles found onsite were the
western fence lizard and side-blotched lizard. Although a roadrunner, and various other bird species were
observed on the site, none of the bird species observed are federally or State-listed species. As noted in
section 4.4 of the Draft MND, to minimize potential impacts to nesting birds protected under the
Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA), construction activities should take place outside nesting season
(February 1 to August 31) to the greatest extent practicable. If construction activities occur during nesting
season, preconstruction surveys and biological monitoring shall be conducted if an active nest is found
within the work area, as noted in mitigation measure (MM) BIO-1. With implementation of MM BIO-1,
impacts to special status species will be less than significant.
Response to Comment 5-3:
The commenter has concerns with the number of homes being proposed on the Project site, and provides
concerns regarding traffic including cumulative impacts due to other projects occurring in the area. As
noted in the Draft MND, no traffic or transportation impacts would result from implementation of the
Proposed Project. This comment letter will be taken under consideration during Planning Commission and
City Council review.
Response to Comment 5-4:
The comment provides concerns regarding the project and impact on businesses. None of the statements
in Comment 5-4 are related to CEQA concerns. However, this comment will be taken under consideration
during Planning Commission and City Council review.
Final Mitigated Negative Declaration for Beltramo Ranch Residential Project
Moorpark, Ventura County, California
Chambers Group, Inc.
21328
36
SECTION 7.0 – REVISIONS TO THE DRAFT MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
This errata section identifies changes made to the Draft MND to correct or clarify the information
contained in the document. Changes made to the Draft MND are identified here in strikeout text to
indicate deletions and bold italics to signify additions.
Section 4.3, Air Quality, c)
Construction-Related TAC Emissions
The greatest potential for toxic air contaminant emissions would be related to diesel particulate
emissions associated with heavy equipment operations during construction of the Proposed Project.
According to the Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA), health effects from
TACs are described in terms of individual cancer risk based on a lifetime (i.e., 30 years) of resident
exposure duration. Given the temporary and short-term construction schedule (approximately
19 months), the Project would not result in a long-term (i.e., lifetime or 30-year) exposure as a result
of project construction. Furthermore, construction-based particulate matter (PM) emissions
(including diesel exhaust emissions) do not exceed VCAPCD thresholds.
The Project would comply with the CARB Air Toxics Control Measure that limits diesel-powered
equipment and vehicle idling to no more than five minutes at a location and the CARB In-Use Off-Road
Diesel Vehicle Regulation; compliance with these would minimize emissions of TACs during
construction. In addition, due to the potential for asbestos exposure during demolition activities,
the Applicant will be required to comply with Air Pollution Control District (APCD) Rule 62.7,
Asbestos – Demolition and Renovation. This includes meeting the notification requirements to APCD
and emission control requirements in Rule 62.7.C.1. Therefore, impacts from TACs during
construction would be less than significant.
Section 4.8, Greenhouse Gas Emissions, b)
Table 6B: Project Consistency with CARB Scoping Plan Policies and Measures
2008 Scoping Plan Measures to Reduce Greenhouse Gas
Emissions Project Compliance with Measure
California Light-Duty Vehicle Greenhouse Gas Standards –
Implement adopted standards and planned second phase
of the program. Align zero-emission vehicle, alternative
and renewable fuel and vehicle technology programs with
long-term climate change goals
No conflict. These are CARB enforced standards;
vehicles that access the Proposed Project, that are
required to comply with the standards, will comply
with the strategy.
Energy Efficiency – Maximize energy efficiency building
and appliance standards; pursue additional energy
efficiency including new technologies, policy, and
implementation mechanisms. Pursue comparable
investment in energy efficiency from all retail providers of
electricity in California.
No conflict. The Proposed Project will be compliant
with the current Title 24 standards.
Low Carbon Fuel Standard – Develop and adopt the Low
Carbon Fuel Standard.
No conflict. These are CARB enforced standards;
vehicles that access the Proposed Project that are
required to comply with the standards will comply
Final Mitigated Negative Declaration for Beltramo Ranch Residential Project
Moorpark, Ventura County, California
Chambers Group, Inc.
21328
37
2008 Scoping Plan Measures to Reduce Greenhouse Gas
Emissions Project Compliance with Measure
with the strategy.
Vehicle Efficiency Measures – Implement light-duty
vehicle efficiency measures.
No conflict. These are CARB enforced standards;
vehicles that access the Proposed Project that are
required to comply with the standards will comply
with the strategy.
Medium/Heavy-Duty Vehicles – Adopt medium and
heavy-vehicle efficiency measures.
No conflict. These are CARB enforced standards;
vehicles that access the Proposed Project that are
required to comply with the standards will comply
with the strategy.
Green Building Strategy – Expand the use of green
building practices to reduce the carbon footprint of
California’s new and existing inventory of buildings.
No conflict. The California Green Building
Standards Code (proposed Part 11, Title 24) was
adopted as part of the California Building
Standards Code in the CCR. Part 11 establishes
voluntary standards, that are mandatory in the
2019 edition of the Code, on planning and design
for sustainable site development, energy efficiency
(in excess of the California Energy Code
requirements), water conservation, material
conservation, and internal air contaminants. The
Proposed Project will be subject to these
Mandatory Standards.
High Global Warming Potential Gases – Adopt measures
to reduce high global warming potential gases.
No conflict. CARB identified five measures that
reduce HFC emissions from vehicular and
commercial refrigeration systems; vehicles that
access the Proposed Project that are required to
comply with the measures will comply with the
strategy.
Recycling and Waste – Reduce methane emissions at
landfills. Increase waste diversion, composting, and
commercial recycling. Move toward zero-waste.
No conflict. The state is currently developing a
regulation to reduce methane emissions from
municipal solid waste landfills. The Proposed
Project will be required to company with City
programs, such as City’s recycling and waste
reduction program, which will comply with the 75
percent reduction required per AB 341.
Water – Continue efficiency programs and use cleaner
energy sources to move and treat water.
No conflict. The Proposed Project will comply with
all applicable City ordinances and CAL Green
requirements.
2017 Scoping Plan Recommended Actions to Reduce
Greenhouse Gas Emissions Project Compliance with Recommended Action
Implement Mobile Source Strategy: Further increase GHG
stringency on all light-duty vehicles beyond existing
Advanced Clean Car regulations
No conflict. These are CARB enforced standards;
vehicles that access the Proposed Project that are
required to comply with the standards will comply
with the strategy.
Implement Mobile Source Strategy: At least 1.5 million
zero emission and plug-in hybrid light-duty electronic
vehicles by 2025 and at least 4.2 million zero emission and
plug-in hybrid light-duty electric vehicles by 2030.
No conflict. These are CARB enforced standards;
vehicles that access the Proposed Project that are
required to comply with the standards will comply
with the strategy.
Final Mitigated Negative Declaration for Beltramo Ranch Residential Project
Moorpark, Ventura County, California
Chambers Group, Inc.
21328
38
2008 Scoping Plan Measures to Reduce Greenhouse Gas
Emissions Project Compliance with Measure
Implement Mobile Source Strategy: Innovative Clean
Transit: Transition to a suite of to-be-determined
innovative clean transit options. Assumed 20 percent of
new urban buses purchased beginning in 2018 will be zero
emission buses with the penetration of zero-emission
technology ramped up to 100 percent of new sales in
2030. Also, new natural gas buses, starting in 2018, and
diesel buses, starting in 2020, meet the optional heavy-
duty lox-NOX standard.
No conflict. These are CARB enforced standards;
vehicles that access the Proposed Project that are
required to comply with the standards will comply
with the strategy.
Implement Mobile Source Strategy: Last Mile Delivery:
New regulation that would result in the use of low NOX or
cleaner engines and the deployment of increasing
numbers of zero-emission trucks primarily for class 3-7
last mile delivery trucks in California. This measure
assumes ZEVs comprise 2.5 percent of new Class 3-7 truck
sales in local fleets starting in 2020, increasing to 10
percent in 2025 and remaining flat through 2030.
No conflict. These are CARB enforced standards;
vehicles that access the Proposed Project that are
required to comply with the standards will comply
with the strategy.
Implement SB 350 by 2030: Establish annual targets for
statewide energy efficiency savings and demand
reduction that will achieve a cumulative doubling of
statewide energy efficiency savings in electricity and
natural gas end uses by 2030.
No conflict. The Proposed Project will be compliant
with the current Title 24 standards.
By 2019, develop regulations and programs to support
organic waste landfill reduction goals in the SLCP and SB
1383.
No conflict. The Proposed Project will be required
to comply with City programs, such as the City’s
recycling and waste reduction program, which
comply with the 75 percent reduction required by
2020 per AB 341.
Source: CARB Scoping Plan (2008 and 2017)
Section 4.10, Hydrology & Water Quality
b) Would the project substantially decrease groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with
groundwater recharge such that the project may impede sustainable groundwater management of
the basin?
Less Than Significant Impact. Ventura County Waterworks District No. 1 (VCWWD) provides domestic
water to Moorpark and will be the water purveyor to the Project site. VCWWD receives its water from
three sources. Approximately 71 percent of its supply is imported potable water from the
Metropolitan Water District (MWD) of Southern California through Calleguas Municipal Water District
(CMWD), a local wholesaler. The imported water is primarily State Water Project water from the
Sacramento-San Joaquin River Delta in Northern California that has been treated at MWD’s Joseph
Jensen Filtration Plant. The second largest supply (approximately 20 percent) comes from local
groundwater production. Groundwater is pumped from the East Las Posas Subbasin via the four active
wells owned and operated by VCWWD. The East Las Posas Subbasin is managed and protected by Fox
Canyon Groundwater Management Agency (FCGMA 2007). The Las Posas Valley Basin Groundwater
Final Mitigated Negative Declaration for Beltramo Ranch Residential Project
Moorpark, Ventura County, California
Chambers Group, Inc.
21328
39
Sustainability Plan (FCGMA 2022) sets a long-term horizon for groundwater sustainability agencies
to achieve their basin’s sustainability goals. The sustainability goal for the Basin is “to maintain a
sufficient volume of groundwater in storage in each management area so that there is no significant
and unreasonable net decline is groundwater elevation or storage over wet and dry climatic cycles.”
Finally, reclaimed water brings in approximately nine percent of all supply through the Moorpark
Water Reclamation Facility (MWRF), which is owned and operated by VCWWD and has been in
operation since 2003 (County 2020).
Section 4.11, Land Use
a) Would the project cause a significant environmental impact due to a conflict with any land use plan,
policy, or regulation adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect?
Less than Significant Impact. The Project is located in the western portion of the City immediately
south of Los Angeles Avenue. The Project site’s General Plan designation is P, L, which allows the
development of one DUAC, and H which allows the development of seven DUAC. Thus, with approval
of the GPA and associated zone updates, land use impacts resulting from the Project would be less
than significant.
To analyze the Project’s compliance with the City General Plan Circulation Element, Associated
Transportation Engineers (ATE) implemented the Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) method to
determine volume-to-capacity ratios and corresponding Levels of Service (LOS) at two six study
intersections (determined in consultation with City staff). LOS varies from LOS A (free flow) to LOS F
(jammed condition). According to Policy 2.1 of the Circulation Element, LOS of C is the performance
objective for traffic volumes on the City’s circulation system. For facilities already operating at LOS C,
the system performance objective is to maintain or improve the current LOS. The City’s “Guidelines
for Preparing Traffic and Circulation Studies” states that if a LOS degradation of one LOS or greater is
attributable to a project, it will be considered significant enough to require mitigation measures.
As seen in Table 7 below, both the study intersections are presently operating will mostly continue to
operate at LOS C or better during the morning (AM) and evening (PM) peak hours in the Cumulative
+ Project Levels of Service, except for State Route 23 southbound ramps/Los Angeles Avenue
intersection. The Project would add 11 trips to the intersection during the PM peak period and
increase the ICU by 0.004. This increase is considered a less-than-significant impact pursuant to
Policy 2.1 of the City of Moorpark Circulation Element, which states: "LOS C shall be the system
performance objective. For facilities already operating at less than LOS C, if a level of service
degradation of one level of service or greater is attributable to a project it will be considered
significant enough to require mitigation measures." The ICU change attributed to the Project is
0.002 (less than ½ of 1 %) -which would result in an insignificant change in traffic operations at the
intersection. In order to determine the operating conditions of the street system with implementation
of the Project, traffic generated by the Project was added to the existing traffic conditions.
According to the ATE, Project-related traffic is not expected to exceed the traffic operations criteria
at any of the six study intersections. Project-related traffic is not expected to exceed the traffic
operations criteria since the LOS does not degrade by one level or greater from existing conditions
(Table 7).
Final Mitigated Negative Declaration for Beltramo Ranch Residential Project
Moorpark, Ventura County, California
Chambers Group, Inc.
21328
40
Table 7: Levels of Service in the Project Vicinity AM and PM Peak Hours
No. Intersection Peak
Hour
2021
Existing
Cumulative
Existing
Cumulative
Plus Project
Significant
Impact
1 Los Angeles Avenue/Tierra Rejada Road AM C C No
PM B B No
2 Los Angeles Avenue/Maureen Lane AM A A No
PM A A No
3 Los Angeles Avenue/Moorpark Avenue AM A A No
PM AB AB No
4 Los Angeles Avenue/Miller Lane AM A A No
PM AB AB No
5 State Route 32 SB Ramps/Los Angeles
Avenue
AM A A No
PM CD CD No
6 State Route 23 NB Ramps/Los Angeles
Avenue
AM A A No
PM A A No
Source: Appendix I
Additionally, the Applicant would pay all applicable fees required by the City’s Municipal Code,
including the traffic systems management fee, the citywide traffic fee, and the county traffic impact
mitigation fee. Thus, implementation of the Project would not conflict with a program, plan,
ordinance, or policy addressing the circulation system; and impacts would be less than significant.
Section 4.19 Utilities & Service Systems
a) Would the project require or result in the relocation or construction of new or expanded water,
wastewater treatment or stormwater drainage, electric power, natural gas, or telecommunications
facilities, the construction or expansion of which could cause significant environmental effects?
Less Than Significant Impact. Ventura County Waterworks District No. 1 (VCWWD) provides domestic
water services to the city and wastewater services via the Moorpark Water Reclamation Facility
(MWRF). Electricity is provided to the city by SCE, and natural gas service is provided by SoCalGas.
Telecommunications services in the city are provided by Time Warner Cable and Spectrum. Water for
the Project would connect to a water line through Glenwood Park and to the existing line in Loretta
Drive;, and wastewater service for the Project would connect to existing sewer lines under Loretta
Drive. For electricity and telecommunication services, the Project would connect to existing power
poles along Beltramo Ranch Road. The Project’s natural gas connection would be located along Los
Angeles Avenue. No offsite impacts are proposed as part of the Project. Therefore, the Project would
have less than significant impacts on existing local utilities.
Final Mitigated Negative Declaration for Beltramo Ranch Residential Project
Moorpark, Ventura County, California
Chambers Group, Inc.
21328
41
SECTION 8.0 – MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
This document, along with the Draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration; Mitigation Monitoring
and Reporting Program; and the Notice of Determination, constitute the Final Mitigated Negative
Declaration for the Beltramo Ranch Residential Project in the City of Moorpark.
Pursuant to Section 21082.1 of the California Environmental Quality Act, the City of Moorpark has
independently reviewed and analyzed the Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration for the
Proposed Project and finds that these documents reflect the independent judgment of the City. The City
of Moorpark, as lead agency, also confirms that the project mitigation measures detailed in these
documents are feasible and will be implemented as stated in the MND and MMRP.
Signature Date
Printed Name Title
Principal Planner
07/21/2022
Shanna Farley
Final Mitigated Negative Declaration for Beltramo Ranch Residential Project
Moorpark, Ventura County, California
Chambers Group, Inc.
21328
42
SECTION 9.0 – REFERENCES
The following is a list of references used in the preparation of this Final MND document.
Fox Canyon Groundwater Management Agency (FCGMA)
2022 Las Posas Valley Groundwater Sustainability Plan. Available at:
https://fcgma.org/groundwater-sustainability-plans-gsps/
APPENDIX A – Air Quality/Greenhouse Gas Emissions Impact Analysis (Updated)
Beltramo Ranch
Air Quality/Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Impact Analysis
March 2022
Prepared By:
Katie Wilson, M.S.
EcoTierra Consulting, Inc.
Beltramo Ranch Project Table of Contents
Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Impact Analysis
i
TABLE OF CONTENTS
I. INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY ..................................................................................................... 1
1. Purpose of Analysis and Study Objectives ................................................................................ 1
2. Project Location ........................................................................................................................ 1
3. Project Description .................................................................................................................... 1
4. Sensitive Receptors in Project Vicinity ...................................................................................... 5
5. Summary of Impacts ................................................................................................................. 5
A. Construction-Source Emissions ...................................................................................... 5
B. Operational-Source Emissions ......................................................................................... 5
C. Greenhouse Gases ........................................................................................................... 6
II. AIR QUALITY ANALYSIS .................................................................................................................... 7
1. Air Quality Standards and Attainment ...................................................................................... 7
A. Pollutants ........................................................................................................................ 7
B. Other Pollutants of Concern .......................................................................................... 10
2. Air Quality Management ......................................................................................................... 11
3. Air Pollutant Emissions Thresholds ......................................................................................... 12
4. Methodology ........................................................................................................................... 12
A. Construction ................................................................................................................. 12
B. Operation ...................................................................................................................... 13
5. Air Quality Standards .............................................................................................................. 14
A. Significance Thresholds ................................................................................................. 14
6. Short-Term Construction Emissions ........................................................................................ 14
A. Construction-Related Impacts ....................................................................................... 15
B. San Joanquin Valley Fever ............................................................................................. 16
C. Construction-Related Toxic-Contaminant Impacts ........................................................ 16
D. Construction-Related Odor Impacts .............................................................................. 17
F. Fugitive Dust-Related Impacts ...................................................................................... 17
7. Long-Term Operational Emissions .......................................................................................... 18
A. Operations-Related Regional Air Quality Impacts ......................................................... 19
COMPLETE ADMINISTRATIVE DRAFT
City of Moorpark April 2022
Beltramo Ranch Project Table of Contents
Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Impact Analysis
ii
B. CO Emissions Impacts From Project-Related Vehicular Trips ........................................ 20
C. Operations-Related Odor Impacts ................................................................................. 20
8. Air Quality Compliance ............................................................................................................ 21
A. Air Quality Compliance .................................................................................................. 21
III. GLOBAL CLIMATE CHANGE ANALYSIS ............................................................................................ 23
1. Existing Greenhouse Gas Environment ................................................................................... 23
A. Water Vapor .................................................................................................................. 23
B. Carbon Dioxide (CO2) ..................................................................................................... 24
C. Nitrous Oxide (N2O) ....................................................................................................... 24
D. Hydrofluorocarbons (HFC) ............................................................................................. 24
E. Perfluorocarbons (PFC) .................................................................................................. 24
F. Sulfur Hexafluoride (SF6) ............................................................................................... 25
G. Aerosols ......................................................................................................................... 25
H. Global Warming Potential ............................................................................................. 25
2. Greenhouse Gas Standards and Regulation ............................................................................ 26
A. International .................................................................................................................. 26
B. Federal ........................................................................................................................... 27
C. State of California .......................................................................................................... 30
D. Regional – Ventura County Air Pollution District .......................................................... 41
E. Local – City of Moorpark ............................................................................................... 43
3. Significance Thresholds ........................................................................................................... 43
A. Appendix G of State CEQA Guidelines ........................................................................... 43
B. Thresholds of Significance for this Project .................................................................... 43
4. Methodology ........................................................................................................................... 44
A. Area Sources .................................................................................................................. 44
B. Energy Usage ................................................................................................................. 44
C. Mobil Sources ................................................................................................................ 44
D. Waste ............................................................................................................................ 44
E. Water ............................................................................................................................. 45
F. Construction .................................................................................................................. 45
COMPLETE ADMINISTRATIVE DRAFT
City of Moorpark April 2022
Beltramo Ranch Project Table of Contents
Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Impact Analysis
iii
5. Project Greenhouse Gas Emissions ......................................................................................... 45
6. Consistency with Applicable Greenhouse Gas Reduction Plans and Policies .......................... 46
7. Cumulative Greenhouse Gas Impacts ..................................................................................... 50
IV. EMISSIONS REDUCTION MEASURES .............................................................................................. 52
1. Construction Measures ........................................................................................................... 52
2. Operational Measures ............................................................................................................. 52
V. REFERENCES ................................................................................................................................... 53
VI. LIST OF ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS .................................................................................... 55
APPENDICES
Appendix A: CalEEMod Model Daily Emissions Printouts
Appendix B: CalEEMod Model Annual Emissions Printouts
Appendix C: Emissions Reduction and Dust Control BMP Measures
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 1: Project Location Map ................................................................................................................ 3
Figure 2: Conceptual Site Plan ................................................................................................................. 4
LIST OF TABLES
Table 1: Construction-Related Pollutant Emissions .............................................................................. 15
Table 2: Operational Pollutant Emissions ............................................................................................. 19
Table 3: Global Warming Potentials and Atmospheric Lifetimes ......................................................... 25
Table 4: Project-Related Greenhouse Gas Emissions ........................................................................... 45
Table 5: Project Consistency with CARB Scoping Plan Policies and Measures ..................................... 47
Beltramo Ranch Project I. Introduction and Summary
Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Impact Analysis
1
I. INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY
1. PURPOSE OF ANALYSIS AND STUDY OBJECTIVES
The purpose of this air quality and global climate change impact analysis is to provide an assessment of
the impacts resulting from development of the proposed Beltramo Residential project and to identify
measures that may be necessary to reduce potentially significant impacts. This study was performed to
address the possibility of regional/local air quality impacts and global climate change impacts, from
project related air emissions. The objectives of the study include:
§ documentation of the atmospheric setting
§ discussion of criteria pollutants and greenhouse gases
§ discussion of the air quality and global climate change regulatory framework
§ discussion of the air quality and greenhouse gases thresholds of significance
§ analysis of the construction related air quality and greenhouse gas emissions
§ analysis of the operations related air quality and greenhouse gas emissions
§ analysis of the conformity of the proposed project with the AQMP
§ recommendations for mitigation measures
The City of Moorpark is the lead agency for this air quality and greenhouse gas analysis, in accordance
with the California Environmental Quality Act authorizing legislation. Although this is a technical report,
every effort has been made to write the report clearly and concisely. To assist the reader with terms
unique to air quality and global climate change, a definition of terms has been provided in Appendix A.
2. PROJECT LOCATION
The project site is located on the south side of Los Angeles Avenue (State Route 118) between Tierra
Rejada Road and Maureen Lane, in the City of Moorpark. The Project is located on an approximately 7.4-
acre site that is occupied by the Four Square Church and two single family residential homes. A vicinity
map showing the project location is provided on Figure 1, Project Location Map.
3. PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The Project is proposing to redevelop the site and construct 47 single family housing units. Figure 2, Site
Plan, illustrates the proposed site plan. The Project would include the demolition of approximately 4,274
square feet (SF) of existing residences/church uses, 3,128 SF of mobile homes, 74,225 SF of
asphalt/paving, and earth work excavation with approximately 2,553 cubic yards (CY) of import, in order
to make way for construction of the new streets, utilities, residential homes, and associated amenities.
An existing triple-wide mobile home (currently on-site) will be returned to the rental agency located
approximately 93.8 miles from the project site, in Mira Loma, CA. As a design feature, the developer will
provide MERV 13 filtration in each new home.
Source: Google Earth, June 2021.
Figure 1
Regional Vicinity and Project Location Map
PROJECT SITE
Project Site
PROJECT
SITE
Loretta Drive
Los Angeles Avenue
Tierra Rejada Road Penrise AvenueJustin CourtElderberry AvenueNightingale Street
Courtney Lane
Beltramo Ranch Road
Source: EcoTierra Consulting, 2021.
Figure 2
Conceptual Site Plan
Complete Administrative Draft City of Moorpark April 2022
Beltramo Ranch Project I. Introduction and Summary
Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Impact Analysis
4
The project is anticipated to be built out in several phases; however, to be conservative, the project has
been analyzed as being built out in one phase, with project construction to start no sooner than January
2023 and take approximately 19 months to complete. The project is anticipated to be operational in 2024.
4. SENSITIVE RECEPTORS IN PROJECT VICINITY
Those who are sensitive to air pollution include children, the elderly, and persons with preexisting
respiratory or cardiovascular illness. For purposes of CEQA, the VCAPCD considers a sensitive receptor to
be a location where a sensitive individual could remain for 24 hours, such as residences, hospitals, or
convalescent facilities (Ventura County Air Quality Assessment Guidelines 2003). Commercial and
industrial facilities are not included in the definition because employees do not typically remain on-site
for 24 hours.
The nearest sensitive receptor to the project site are the existing single-family detached residential
dwelling units located directly adjacent to the eastern, western and southern boundaries of the project
site. Additionally, there is a small hospice facility located within a residence at 4762 Maureen Lane,
located approximately 265 feet east of the site. Other air quality sensitive land uses are located further
from the project site and would experience lower impacts
5. SUMMARY OF IMPACTS
A. Construction-Source Emissions
Project construction-source emissions would not exceed applicable thresholds of significance established
by the Ventura County Air Pollution Control District (VCAPCD).
As discussed herein, the project will comply with all applicable VCAPCD construction-source emission
reduction rules and guidelines. Project construction source emissions would not cause or substantively
contribute to violation of the California Ambient Air Quality Standards (CAAQS) or National Ambient Air
Quality Standards (NAAQS) or result in toxic air contaminant (TAC)-related impacts.
Established requirements addressing construction equipment operations, and construction material use,
storage, and disposal requirements act to minimize odor impacts that may result from construction
activities. Moreover, construction-source odor emissions would be temporary, short-term, and
intermittent in nature and would not result in persistent impacts that would affect substantial numbers
of people. Potential construction-source odor impacts are therefore considered less than significant.
Construction of the project would not significantly increase the risk to public health for San Joaquin Valley
Fever above existing background levels.
Complete Administrative Draft City of Moorpark April 2022
Beltramo Ranch Project I. Introduction and Summary
Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Impact Analysis
5
B. Operational-Source Emissions
The project operational-sourced emissions would not exceed applicable thresholds of significance
established by the VCAPCD. Additionally, project-related trips will not cause or result in CO concentrations
exceeding applicable state and/or federal standards (CO “hotspots). Project operational-source emissions
would therefore not adversely affect sensitive receptors within the vicinity of the project.
The project's emissions meet VCAPCD thresholds and will not result in a significant cumulative impact.
The project does not propose any such uses or activities that would result in potentially significant
operational-source toxic air contaminants or odor impacts. Potential operational-source odor impacts are
therefore considered less than significant.
Operation of the project would not significantly increase the risk to public health for San Joaquin Valley
Fever above existing background levels.
C. Greenhouse Gases
Project-related GHG emissions will not exceed the SCAQMD Draft GHG emissions threshold of 3,000
MTCO2e per year for all land uses and will not conflict with the CARB Scoping Plan. Therefore, the project
would not conflict with an applicable plan, policy or regulation of an agency adopted for the purpose of
reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases and impacts are considered to be less than significant.
Beltramo Ranch Project II. Air Quality Analysis
Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Impact Analysis
7
II. AIR QUALITY ANALYSIS
1. AIR QUALITY STANDARDS AND ATTAINMENT
The project site is located within the City of Moorpark, which lies within the South Central Coast Air Basin
(the Basin), which is under the jurisdiction of the Ventura County Air Pollution Control District (VCAPCD),
the Santa Barbara County Air Pollution Control District (SBCAPCD), and the San Luis Obispo Air Pollution
Control District (SLOAPCD). The project site falls within the portion of the Basin overseen by VCAPCD. As
the local air quality management agency, the VCAPCD is required to monitor air pollutant levels to ensure
that State and federal air quality standards are met and, if they are not met, to develop strategies to meet
the standards. Depending on whether or not the standards are met or exceeded, the Basin is classified as
being in “attainment” or “nonattainment.”
The Basin is designated a nonattainment area for the federal and State eight-hour ozone standards and
the State one-hour ozone and PM10 standards (VCAPCD 2017, California Air Resources Board [CARB]
2019). The Basin is in attainment of all other federal and State standards. Because the Basin currently
exceeds these State and federal ambient air quality standards, it is required to implement strategies to
reduce pollutant levels to recognized acceptable standards. This nonattainment status is a result of several
factors, the primary ones being naturally adverse meteorological conditions that limit the dispersion and
diffusion of pollutants, the limited capacity of the local airshed to eliminate air pollutants, and the number,
type, and density of emission sources within the Basin.
The VCAPCD Ventura County Air Quality Assessment Guidelines (2003) also note San Joaquin Valley Fever
(formally known as Coccidioidomycosis), as an air pollutant and disease of countywide concern. San
Joaquin Valley Fever (Valley Fever) is an infectious disease caused by the fungus Coccidioides immitis.
Infection is caused by inhalation of Coccidioides immitis spores that have become airborne when dry,
dusty soil or dirt is disturbed by natural processes such as wind or earthquakes, or by human induced
ground-disturbing activities such as construction, farming, or other activities (VCAPCD 2003). In 2019 the
number of cases of Valley Fever reported in California was 9,004, with 364 cases reported in Ventura
County (California Department of Public Health 2019)1.
A. Pollutants
Pollutants are generally classified as either criteria pollutants or non-criteria pollutants. Federal ambient
air quality standards have been established for criteria pollutants, whereas no ambient standards have
been established for non-criteria pollutants. For some criteria pollutants, separate standards have been
set for different periods. Most standards have been set to protect public health. For some pollutants,
standards have been based on other values (such as protection of crops, protection of materials, or
1 Source: https://www.cdph.ca.gov/Programs/CID/DCDC/CDPH%20Document%20Library/CocciEpiSummary2019.pdf.
Complete Administrative Draft City of Moorpark April 2022
Beltramo Ranch Project II. Air Quality Analysis
Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Impact Analysis
8
avoidance of nuisance conditions). A summary of federal and state ambient air quality standards is
provided in the Regulatory Framework section.
i) Criteria Pollutants
The criteria pollutants consist of: ozone, nitrogen dioxide, carbon monoxide, sulfur dioxide, lead, and
particulate matter. These pollutants can harm your health and the environment, and cause property
damage. The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) calls these pollutants “criteria” air pollutants
because it regulates them by developing human health-based and/or environmentally-based criteria for
setting permissible levels. The following provides descriptions of each of the criteria pollutants.
ii) Nitrogen Dioxides
Nitrogen Oxides (NOx) is the generic term for a group of highly reactive gases which contain nitrogen and
oxygen. While most NOx are colorless and odorless, concentrations of nitrogen dioxide (NO2) can often
be seen as a reddish-brown layer over many urban areas. NOx form when fuel is burned at high
temperatures, as in a combustion process. The primary manmade sources of NOx are motor vehicles,
electric utilities, and other industrial, commercial, and residential sources that burn fuel. NOx reacts with
other pollutants to form, ground-level ozone, nitrate particles, acid aerosols, as well as NO2, which cause
respiratory problems. NOx and the pollutants formed from NOx can be transported over long distances,
following the patterns of prevailing winds. Therefore, controlling NOx is often most effective if done from
a regional perspective, rather than focusing on the nearest sources.
iii) Ozone
Ozone (O3) is not usually emitted directly into the air but at ground-level is created by a chemical reaction
between NOx and volatile organic compounds (VOC) in the presence of sunlight. Motor vehicle exhaust,
industrial emissions, gasoline vapors, chemical solvents as well as natural sources emit NOx and VOC that
help form ozone. Ground-level ozone is the primary constituent of smog. Sunlight and hot weather cause
ground-level ozone to form with the greatest concentrations usually occurring downwind from urban
areas. Ozone is subsequently considered a regional pollutant. Ground-level ozone is a respiratory irritant
and an oxidant that increases susceptibility to respiratory infections and can cause substantial damage to
vegetation and other materials. Because NOx and VOC are ozone precursors, the health effects associated
with ozone are also indirect health effects associated with significant levels of NOx and VOC emissions.
iv) Carbon Monoxide
Carbon monoxide (CO) is a colorless, odorless gas that is formed when carbon in fuel is not burned
completely. It is a component of motor vehicle exhaust, which contributes about 56 percent of all CO
emissions nationwide. In cities, 85 to 95 percent of all CO emissions may come from motor vehicle
exhaust.
Complete Administrative Draft City of Moorpark April 2022
Beltramo Ranch Project II. Air Quality Analysis
Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Impact Analysis
9
Other sources of CO emissions include industrial processes (such as metals processing and chemical
manufacturing), residential wood burning, and natural sources such as forest fires. Woodstoves, gas
stoves, cigarette smoke, and unvented gas and kerosene space heaters are indoor sources of CO. The
highest levels of CO in the outside air typically occur during the colder months of the year when inversion
conditions are more frequent. The air pollution becomes trapped near the ground beneath a layer of
warm air. CO is described as having only a local influence because it dissipates quickly. Since CO
concentrations are strongly associated with motor vehicle emissions, high CO concentrations generally
occur in the immediate vicinity of roadways with high traffic volumes and traffic congestion, active parking
lots, and in automobile tunnels. Areas adjacent to heavily traveled and congested intersections are
particularly susceptible to high CO concentrations.
CO is a public health concern because it combines readily with hemoglobin and thus reduces the amount
of oxygen transported in the bloodstream. The health threat from lower levels of CO is most serious for
those who suffer from heart disease such as angina, clogged arteries, or congestive heart failure. For a
person with heart disease, a single exposure to CO at low levels may cause chest pain and reduce that
person’s ability to exercise; repeated exposures may contribute to other cardiovascular effects. High levels
of CO can affect even healthy people. People who breathe high levels of CO can develop vision problems,
reduced ability to work or learn, reduced manual dexterity, and difficulty performing complex tasks. At
extremely high levels, CO is poisonous and can cause death.
v) Sulfur Dioxide
Sulfur Oxide (SOx) gases (including sulfur dioxide [SO2]) are formed when fuel containing sulfur, such as
coal and oil is burned, and from the refining of gasoline. SOx dissolves easily in water vapor to form acid
and interacts with other gases and particles in the air to form sulfates and other products that can be
harmful to people and the environment.
vi) Lead
Lead (Pb) is a metal found naturally in the environment as well as manufactured products. The major
sources of lead emissions have historically been motor vehicles and industrial sources. Due to the phase
out of leaded gasoline, metal processing is now the primary source of lead emissions to the air. High levels
of lead in the air are typically only found near lead smelters, waste incinerators, utilities, and lead-acid
battery manufacturers. Exposure of fetuses, infants, and children to low levels of lead can adversely affect
the development and function of the central nervous system, leading to learning disorders, distractibility,
inability to follow simple commands, and lower intelligence quotient. In adults, increased lead levels are
associated with increased blood pressure.
vii) Particulate Matter
Particulate matter (PM) is the term for a mixture of solid particles and liquid droplets found in the air.
Particulate matter is made up of a number of components including acids (such as nitrates and sulfates),
Complete Administrative Draft City of Moorpark April 2022
Beltramo Ranch Project II. Air Quality Analysis
Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Impact Analysis
10
organic chemicals, metals, and soil or dust particles. The size of particles is directly linked to their potential
for causing health problems. Particles that are less than 10 micrometers in diameter (PM10) are the
particles that generally pass through the throat and nose and enter the lungs. Once inhaled, these
particles can affect the heart and lungs and cause serious health effects. Particles that are less than 2.5
micrometers in diameter (PM2.5) have been designated as a subset of PM10 due to their increased
negative health impacts and its ability to remain suspended in the air longer and travel further.
viii) Reactive Organic Gases (ROG)
Although not a criteria pollutant, reactive organic gases (ROGs), or volatile organic compounds (VOCs),
are defined as any compound of carbon—excluding carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide, carbonic acid,
metallic carbides or carbonates, and ammonium carbonate—that participates in atmospheric
photochemical reactions. Although there are slight differences in the definition of ROGs and VOCs, the
two terms are often used interchangeably. Indoor sources of VOCs include paints, solvents, aerosol sprays,
cleansers, tobacco smoke, etc. Outdoor sources of VOCs are from combustion and fuel evaporation. A
reduction in VOC emissions reduces certain chemical reactions that contribute to the formulation of
ozone. VOCs are transformed into organic aerosols in the atmosphere, which contribute to higher PM10
and lower visibility.
B. Other Pollutants of Concern
i) Toxic Air Contaminants
In addition to the above-listed criteria pollutants, toxic air contaminants (TACs) are another group of
pollutants of concern. Sources of toxic air contaminants include industrial processes such as petroleum
refining and chrome plating operations, commercial operations such as gasoline stations and dry cleaners,
and motor vehicle exhaust. Cars and trucks release at least forty different toxic air contaminants. The
most important of these toxic air contaminants, in terms of health risk, are diesel particulates, benzene,
formaldehyde, 1,3-butadiene, and acetaldehyde. Public exposure to toxic air contaminants can result
from emissions from normal operations as well as from accidental releases. Health effects of toxic air
contaminants include cancer, birth defects, neurological damage, and death.
Toxic air contaminants are less pervasive in the urban atmosphere than criteria air pollutants, however
they are linked to short-term (acute) or long-term (chronic or carcinogenic) adverse human health effects.
There are hundreds of different types of toxic air contaminants with varying degrees of toxicity. Sources
of toxic air contaminants include industrial processes, commercial operations (e.g., gasoline stations and
dry cleaners), and motor vehicle exhaust.
According to the 2013 California Almanac of Emissions and Air Quality, the majority of the estimated
health risk from toxic air contaminants can be attributed to relatively few compounds, the most important
of which is diesel particulate matter (DPM). Diesel particulate matter is a subset of PM2.5 because the
size of diesel particles are typically 2.5 microns and smaller. The identification of diesel particulate matter
Complete Administrative Draft City of Moorpark April 2022
Beltramo Ranch Project II. Air Quality Analysis
Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Impact Analysis
11
as a toxic air contaminant in 1998 led the California Air Resources Board (CARB) to adopt the Risk
Reduction Plan to Reduce Particulate Matter Emissions from Diesel-fueled Engines and Vehicles in
September 2000. The plan’s goals are a 75-percent reduction in diesel particulate matter by 2010 and an
85-percent reduction by 2020 from the 2000 baseline. Diesel engines emit a complex mixture of air
pollutants, composed of gaseous and solid material. The visible emissions in diesel exhaust are known as
particulate matter or PM, which includes carbon particles or “soot”. Diesel exhaust also contains a variety
of harmful gases and over 40 other cancer-causing substances. California’s identification of diesel
particulate matter as a toxic air contaminant was based on its potential to cause cancer, premature
deaths, and other health problems. Exposure to diesel particulate matter is a health hazard, particularly
to children whose lungs are still developing and the elderly who may have other serious health problems.
Overall, diesel engine emissions are responsible for the majority of California’s potential airborne cancer
risk from combustion sources.
ii) Asbestos
Asbestos is listed as a TAC by the ARB and as a Hazardous Air Pollutant by the EPA. Asbestos occurs
naturally in mineral formations and crushing or breaking these rocks, through construction or other
means, can release asbestiform fibers into the air. Asbestos emissions can result from the sale or use of
asbestos-containing materials, road surfacing with such materials, grading activities, and surface mining.
The risk of disease is dependent upon the intensity and duration of exposure. When inhaled, asbestos
fibers may remain in the lungs and with time may be linked to such diseases as asbestosis, lung cancer,
and mesothelioma. Naturally occurring asbestos is not present in Ventura County. The nearest likely
locations of naturally occurring asbestos, as identified in the General Location Guide for Ultramafic Rocks
in California prepared by the California Division of Mines and Geology, is located in Santa Barbara County.
Due to the distance to the nearest natural occurrences of asbestos, the project site is not likely to contain
asbestos.
2. AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT
The proposed Under State law, the VCAPCD is required to prepare a plan for air quality improvement for
pollutants for which the VCAPCD is in non-compliance. The VCAPCD’s 2016 Air Quality Management Plan
(AQMP) is an update of the previous 2007 AQMP. The 2016 AQMP, adopted on February 14, 2017,
incorporates new scientific data and notable regulatory actions that have occurred since adoption of the
2007 AQMP, including the approval of the new federal 8-hour ozone standard of 0.070 ppm that was
finalized in 2015. This Plan builds upon the approaches taken in the 2007 AQMP for the attainment of
federal ozone standards and includes attainment and reasonable further progress demonstrations of the
new federal eight-hour ozone standard (VCAPCD 2017).
Complete Administrative Draft City of Moorpark April 2022
Beltramo Ranch Project II. Air Quality Analysis
Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Impact Analysis
12
3. AIR POLLLUTANT EMISSIONS THRESHOLDS
The 2016 AQMP provides a strategy for the attainment of State and federal air quality standards. The
VCAPCD has adopted guidelines for quantifying and determining the significance of air quality emissions
(VCAPCD 2003). The VCAPCD considers operational air quality impacts to be significant if a project would
generate more than 25 pounds per day of ozone precursors reactive organic compounds (ROC) or nitrogen
oxides (NOx). For all other criteria pollutants, the VCAPCD considers a significant adverse air quality impact
to occur when a project measurably worsens an existing exceedance of a State or federal ambient air
quality standard. Furthermore, construction-related air quality impacts are considered significant if
fugitive dust emissions are generated in such quantities as to cause injury, detriment, nuisance, or
annoyance to any considerable number of persons or to the public, or which may endanger the comfort,
repose, health, or safety of any such person or the public. The VCAPCD considers a project to have a
significant cumulative adverse air quality impact if project emissions exceed two pounds per day of ROC
or NOX and if the project is inconsistent with the population forecasts contained in the AQMP.
4. METHODOLOGY
The following provides a discussion of the methodology used to calculate the construction and operational
air emissions. Emissions are estimated using the CalEEMod (Version 2020.4.0) software, which is a
statewide land use emissions computer model designed to provide a uniform platform for government
agencies, land use planners, and environmental professionals to quantify potential criteria pollutant and
GHG emissions from a variety of land use projects. CalEEMod was developed in collaboration with the air
districts of California. Regional data (e.g., emission factors, trip lengths, meteorology, source inventory,
etc.) have been provided by the various California air districts to account for local requirements and
conditions. The model is considered to be an accurate and comprehensive tool for quantifying air quality
and GHG impacts from land use projects throughout California.
A. Construction
The construction-related regional air quality impacts have been analyzed for both criteria pollutants and
GHGs. Daily regional emissions during construction are forecasted by assuming a conservative estimate
of construction activities (i.e., assuming all construction occurs at the earliest feasible date) and applying
the mobile source and fugitive dust emissions factors. The input values used in this analysis were adjusted
to be project-specific for the construction schedule and the equipment used was based on CalEEMod
defaults. The CalEEMod program uses the EMFAC2017 computer program to calculate the emission rates
specific for Ventura County for construction-related employee vehicle trips and the OFFROAD2011
computer program to calculate emission rates for heavy truck operations. EMFAC2017 and OFFROAD2011
are computer programs generated by CARB that calculates composite emission rates for vehicles.
Emission rates are reported by the program in grams per trip and grams per mile or grams per running
hour. Daily truck trips and CalEEMod default trip length data were used to assess roadway emissions from
Complete Administrative Draft City of Moorpark April 2022
Beltramo Ranch Project II. Air Quality Analysis
Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Impact Analysis
13
truck exhaust. The maximum daily emissions are estimated values for the worst-case day and do not
represent the emissions that would occur for every day of project construction. The maximum daily
emissions are compared to the SCAQMD daily regional numeric indicators. Detailed construction
equipment lists, construction scheduling, and emission calculations are provided in Appendix B.
The project will be required to comply with all applicable regulatory standards, including VCAPCD Rule 55
(Fugitive Dust), Rule 74.2 (Asbestos – Demolition and Renovation), and Rule 74.2 (Architectural Coatings).
Project demolition activities shall be operated in accordance with the Rules and Regulations of the
Ventura County Air Pollution Control District, with emphasis on Rule 62.7, Asbestos – Demolition and
Renovation. Specifically, the applicant shall submit an AB3205 Form to VCAPCD for approval. In addition,
the contractor shall notify VCAPCD 10 business days prior to the abatement commencement, if applicable,
by submitting a Notification of Demolition or Renovation Form. Demolition and/or renovation activities
shall be conducted in compliance with VCAPCD Rule 62.7, Asbestos – Demolition and Renovation.
The phases of the construction activities which have been analyzed below for each phase are: (1)
demolition, (2) grading, (3) building construction, (4) paving, and (5) application of architectural coatings.
Details pertaining to the project's construction timing and the type of equipment modeled for each
construction phase are available in the CalEEMod output in Appendix B of this technical report.
B. Operation
The operations-related criteria air quality impacts created by the proposed project have been analyzed
through the use of the CalEEMod model. The operating emissions were based on the year 2023, which is
the anticipated opening year for the proposed project. The operations daily emissions printouts from the
CalEEMod model are provided in Appendix B. The CalEEMod analyzes operational emissions from area
sources, energy usage, and mobile sources, which are discussed below.
i) Mobile Sources
Mobile sources include emissions from the additional vehicle miles generated from the proposed project.
The vehicle trips associated with the proposed project have been analyzed by inputting the project-
generated vehicular trips from the Beltramo Ranch Residential Project Traffic and Circulation Study (TIA)
prepared by Associated Transportation Engineers (May 19, 2021) for the proposed project into the
CalEEMod Model. The CalEEMod program then applies the emission factors for each trip, which is
provided by the EMFAC2017 model, to determine the vehicular traffic pollutant emissions.
ii) Area Sources
Area sources include emissions from consumer products, landscape equipment and architectural
coatings. The CalEEMod default setting for area sources has no woodstoves and no fireplaces. Landscape
Complete Administrative Draft City of Moorpark April 2022
Beltramo Ranch Project II. Air Quality Analysis
Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Impact Analysis
14
maintenance includes fuel combustion emissions from equipment such as lawn mowers, rototillers,
shredders/grinders, blowers, trimmers, chain saws, and hedge trimmers, as well as air compressors,
generators, and pumps. As specifics were not known about the landscaping equipment fleet, CalEEMod
defaults were used to estimate emissions from landscaping equipment. No changes were made to the
default area source parameters.
iii) Energy Usage
Energy usage includes emissions from the generation of electricity and natural gas used on-site. No
changes were made to the default energy usage parameters.
5. AIR QUALITY STANDARDS
A. Significance Thresholds
i) Appendix G of the State CEQA Guidelines
Appendix G of the State CEQA Guidelines states that, where available, the significance criteria established
by the applicable air quality management district or air pollution control district may be relied upon to
make a significance determination. Pursuant to Appendix G, the project would result in a significant
impact related to air quality if it would:
§ Conflict with or obstruct the implementation of the applicable air quality plan;
§ Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project
region is nonattainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard;
§ Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations; or
§ Result in other emissions (such as those leading to odors) adversely affecting a substantial number
of people.
The CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.7 provides the significance criteria established by the applicable air
quality management district or air pollution control district, when available, may be relied upon to make
determinations of significance.
6. SHORT-TERM CONSTRUCTION EMISSIONS
Construction activities associated with the proposed project would have the potential to generate air
emissions, toxic air contaminant emissions, and odor impacts. Assumptions for the phasing, duration, and
required equipment for the construction of the proposed project were obtained from the project
applicant. The construction activities for the proposed project are anticipated to include: demolition of
7,402 SF of existing buildings and 74,225 SF of existing asphalt/paving (for a total of 841.5 tons of
demolition), grading of the project area (~7.4 acres); construction of 47 single-family dwelling units and
56,000 SF of open space; paving of approximately 1.85 acres of on-site roads; and application of
architectural coatings. The project is anticipated to import approximately 2,553 CY of material during
Complete Administrative Draft City of Moorpark April 2022
Beltramo Ranch Project II. Air Quality Analysis
Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Impact Analysis
15
grading. An existing triple-wide mobile home (currently on-site) will be returned to the rental agency
located approximately 93.8 miles from the project site, in Mira Loma, CA. See Appendix B for more details.
The proposed project is anticipated to start construction no sooner than January 2023 and take
approximately 19 months to complete. The project is anticipated to be operational in 2024.
A. Construction-Related Impacts
The construction-related criteria pollutant emissions for each phase are shown below in Table 1
Construction-Related Regional Pollutant Emissions. The VCAPCD Thresholds for ROG and NOx do not
apply to construction emissions, however they have been included in Table 1 for informational purposes
only.
Table 1
Construction-Related Pollutant Emissions
Activity
Pollutant Emissions (pounds/day)
ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10 PM2.5
Demolition
On-Site1 2.27 21.48 19.64 0.04 1.61 1.02
Off-Site2 0.06 0.89 0.59 0.01 0.26 0.08
Subtotal 2.33 22.38 20.23 0.04 1.87 1.10
Grading
On-Site1 1.71 17.94 14.75 0.03 7.86 4.14
Off-Site2 0.05 0.36 0.48 0.00 0.17 0.05
Subtotal 1.76 18.30 15.23 0.03 8.03 4.19
Building
Construction
On-Site1 1.57 14.38 16.24 0.03 0.70 0.66
Off-Site2 0.26 1.22 2.26 0.01 0.80 0.22
Subtotal 1.83 15.61 18.51 0.04 1.50 0.88
Paving
On-Site1 1.08 9.52 14.63 0.02 0.47 0.43
Off-Site2 0.04 0.03 0.35 0.00 0.12 0.03
Subtotal 1.12 9.55 14.98 0.02 0.59 0.46
Architectural
Coating
On-Site1 16.23 1.22 1.81 0.00 0.06 0.06
Off-Site2 0.04 0.03 0.36 0.12 0.03 0.03
Subtotal 16.27 1.25 2.17 0.13 0.09 0.09
Total for overlapping phases3 17.39 10.80 17.15 0.15 0.69 0.56
Maximum Daily Emissions 17.39 22.38 20.23 0.15 8.03 4.19
VCAPCD Thresholds 25 25 NT NT NT NT
Notes:
(1) On-site emissions from equipment operated on-site that is not operated on public roads.
(2) Off-site emissions from equipment operated on public roads.
(3) Painting and paving phases may overlap.
NT = No threshold
Source: CalEEMod Version 2020.4.0.
Through adherence to Rules 55, 74.2 and 62.7, construction emissions would result in less than significant
impacts and would not expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations. Although
Complete Administrative Draft City of Moorpark April 2022
Beltramo Ranch Project II. Air Quality Analysis
Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Impact Analysis
16
construction-related impacts would be less than significant because of their temporary nature, the
VCAPCD recommends measures to minimize construction-related emissions. The project will incorporate
construction-related best management practices (BMPs) as feasible, per VCAPCD recommendations. See
Appendix C for BMPs.
B. San Joaquin Valley Fever
There is no recommended threshold for a significant San Joaquin Valley Fever impact. However, listed
below are factors that may indicate a project’s potential to create significant Valley Fever impacts:
• Disturbance of the top soil of undeveloped land (to a depth of about 12 inches)
• Dry, alkaline, sandy soils.
• Virgin, undisturbed, non-urban areas.
• Windy areas.
• Archaeological resources probable or known to exist in the area (Native American midden sites).
• Special events (fairs, concerts) and motorized activities (motocross track, All Terrain Vehicle
activities) on unvegetated soil (non-grass).
• Non-native population (i.e., out-of-area construction workers).
The lead agency should consider the factors above that are applicable to the project or the project site.
The likelihood that the Valley Fever fungus may be present and impact nearby land uses (or the project
itself) increases with the number of the above factors applicable to the project or the project site. Based
on these or other factors, if a lead agency determines that project activities may create a significant Valley
Fever impact, the VCAPCD recommends that the lead agency consider the Valley Fever mitigation
measures listed in the VCAPCD Guidelines.2
Construction activities, including site preparation and grading, would have the potential to release
Coccidioides immitis spores. Nonetheless, the population of Moorpark has been and will continue to be
exposed to Valley Fever from agricultural and construction activities occurring throughout the region. In
addition, substantial increases in the number of reported cases of Valley Fever tend to occur only after
major ground-disturbing events such as the 1994 Northridge earthquake. Construction of the proposed
project is in an area that has been disturbed by previous development and is not excessively windy. The
project does not include any “special events” similar to those listed above. Therefore, construction and
operation of the proposed project would not significantly increase the risk to public health above existing
background levels.
2 Source: http://www.vcapcd.org/pubs/Planning/VCAQGuidelines.pdf. Section 7.4.2.
Complete Administrative Draft City of Moorpark April 2022
Beltramo Ranch Project II. Air Quality Analysis
Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Impact Analysis
17
C. Construction-Related Toxic Contaminant Impacts
The greatest potential for toxic air contaminant emissions would be related to diesel particulate emissions
associated with heavy equipment operations during construction of the proposed project. According to
the Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA), health effects from TACs are described
in terms of individual cancer risk based on a lifetime (i.e., 30-year) resident exposure duration. Given the
temporary and short-term construction schedule (approximately 19 months), the Project would not result
in a long-term (i.e., lifetime or 30-year) exposure as a result of project construction. Furthermore,
construction-based particulate matter (PM) emissions (including diesel exhaust emissions) do not exceed
VCAPCD thresholds.
The project would comply with the CARB Air Toxics Control Measure that limits diesel powered equipment
and vehicle idling to no more than 5 minutes at a location, and the CARB In-Use Off-Road Diesel Vehicle
Regulation; compliance with these would minimize emissions of TACs during construction. Therefore,
impacts from TACs during construction would be less than significant.
D. Construction-Related Odor Impacts
Potential sources that may emit odors during construction activities include the application of materials
such as asphalt pavement. The objectionable odors that may be produced during the construction process
are of short-term in nature and the odor emissions are expected to cease upon the drying or hardening
of the odor producing materials. Due to the short-term nature and limited amounts of odor producing
materials being utilized, no significant impact related to odors would occur during construction of the
proposed project. Diesel exhaust and VOCs would be emitted during construction of the project, which
are objectionable to some; however, emissions would disperse rapidly from the project site and therefore
should not reach an objectionable level at the nearest sensitive receptors.
E. Fugitive Dust-Related Impacts
The VCAPCD recommends minimizing fugitive dust, especially during grading and excavation operations,
rather than quantifying fugitive dust emissions.
Control techniques for fugitive dust generally involve watering, chemical dust control agents for soil
stabilization, scheduling of activities, and vehicle speed control. Watering, the most common and
generally least expensive method, provides only temporary dust control. Watering also usually requires
the use of diesel-powered watering trucks or pumps. The effectiveness of water for fugitive dust control
depends greatly on the prevailing weather conditions and frequency of application. Chemical dust control
agents provide longer dust suppression, but are not effective in reducing the large portion of construction
dust emissions caused by grading, excavation, and cut-and-fill operations. Dust control agents for soil
stabilization are useful primarily for application on completed cuts, fills, and unpaved roadways. Fugitive
dust emissions from inactive portions of a construction site can be reduced up to 80 percent with chemical
Complete Administrative Draft City of Moorpark April 2022
Beltramo Ranch Project II. Air Quality Analysis
Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Impact Analysis
18
stabilizers. Chemical stabilizers, however, may be costly and should be limited to environmentally-safe
materials to avoid adverse effects on plant and animal life.
Scheduling activities during periods of low wind speed will also reduce fugitive dust emissions. Low wind
speeds typically occur during morning hours. Highest wind speeds are observed during Santa Ana wind
conditions, which commonly occur between October and February with December having the highest
frequency of events. Additionally, vehicle speed control can reduce fugitive dust emissions from unpaved
roads and areas at construction sites by up to 60 percent, assuming compliance with a 15 miles per hour
(mph) on-site speed limit.
During clearing, grading, earth moving, or excavation operations, excessive fugitive dust emissions shall
be controlled by regular watering, paving construction roads, or other dust preventive measures using the
following procedures:
• All material excavated or graded shall be sufficiently watered to prevent excessive amounts of
dust. Watering shall occur at least twice daily with complete coverage, preferably in the late
morning and after work is done for the day, so that water penetrates sufficiently to minimize
fugitive dust during grading activities. Reclaimed water should be used if available.
• All graded and excavated material, exposed soil areas, and active portions of the construction site,
including unpaved roadways on-site, should be treated to prevent fugitive dust. Measures may
include watering, application of environmentally-safe soil stabilization materials, and/or roll-
compaction as appropriate.
• Graded and/or excavated inactive areas of the construction site should be monitored at least
weekly for dust stabilization. If a portion of the site is inactive for over four days, soil on-site should
be stabilized.
• Signs should be posted limiting on-site traffic to 15 miles per hour.
• All clearing, grading, earth moving, or excavation activities shall cease during periods of high winds
(i.e., greater than 20 miles per hour averaged over one hour) so as to prevent excessive amounts
of dust.
• All material transported off-site shall be either sufficiently watered or securely covered to prevent
excessive amounts of dust pursuant to California Vehicle Code §23114.
• The area disturbed by clearing, grading, earth moving, or excavation operations shall be
minimized so as to prevent excessive amounts of dust.
Compliance with Rule 55 will reduce impacts from fugitive dust to less than significant.
7. LONG-TERM OPERATIONAL EMISSIONS
The on-going operation of the proposed project would result in a long-term increase in air quality
emissions. This increase would be due to emissions from the project-generated vehicle trips and through
Complete Administrative Draft City of Moorpark April 2022
Beltramo Ranch Project II. Air Quality Analysis
Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Impact Analysis
19
operational emissions from the on-going use of the proposed project. The following section provides an
analysis of potential long-term air quality impacts due to: regional air quality impacts with the on-going
operations of the proposed project.
A. Operations-Related Air Quality Impacts
The operations-related criteria air quality impacts created by the proposed project have been analyzed
through the use of the CalEEMod model. The operating emissions were based on the year 2023, which is
the anticipated opening year for the proposed project. The operations daily emissions printouts from the
CalEEMod model are provided in Appendix B. As stated previously, CalEEMod analyzes operational
emissions from area sources, energy usage, and mobile sources.
i) Mobile Sources
The TIA found that the proposed project will generate a total of 378 net daily trips (444 trips for the
proposed use minus 66 trips from the existing church and residential uses being demolished). The mobile
source emissions were reported in Table 2, Operational Pollutant Emissions.
Table 2:
Operational Pollutant Emissions
Activity
Pollutant Emissions (pounds/day)
ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10 PM2.5
Area Sources1 2.22 0.04 3.88 0.00 0.02 0.02
Energy Usage2 0.03 0.28 0.12 0.00 0.02 0.02
Mobile Sources3 1.31 1.53 12.14 0.02 2.63 0.71
Subtotal Emissions 3.56 1.86 16.14 0.03 2.67 0.76
-Existing Uses Being Removed -0.79 -0.58 -4.43 -0.01 -0.87 -0.24
Total Emissions 2.77 1.28 11.71 0.02 1.81 0.52
VCAPCD Thresholds 25 25 NT NT NT NT
Exceeds Threshold? No No No No No No
Notes:
(1) Area sources consist of emissions from consumer products, architectural coatings, and landscaping equipment.
(2) Energy usage consists of emissions from generation of electricity and on-site natural gas usage.
(3) Mobile sources consist of emissions from vehicles and road dust.
NT = No threshold.
Source: CalEEMod Version 2020.4.0. Daily Emissions (see Appendix B for daily emissions).
ii) Project Impacts
The worst-case summer or winter criteria pollutant emissions created from the proposed project’s long-
term operations have been calculated and are shown in Table 2 above. Table 2 shows that even before
the emissions related to the removal of the exiting uses are subtracted, none of the analyzed criteria
pollutants would exceed the VCAPCD emissions thresholds. Therefore, a less than significant air quality
impact would occur from operation of the proposed project and the project would not expose sensitive
receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations.
Complete Administrative Draft City of Moorpark April 2022
Beltramo Ranch Project II. Air Quality Analysis
Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Impact Analysis
20
B. CO Emissions Impacts From Project-Related Vehicular Trips
CO is the pollutant of major concern along roadways because the most notable source of CO is motor
vehicles. For this reason, CO concentrations are usually indicative of the local air quality generated by a
roadway network and are used as an indicator of potential local air quality impacts. Local air quality
impacts can be assessed by comparing future without and with project CO levels to the State and Federal
CO standards which were presented above.
To determine if the proposed project could cause emission levels in excess of the CO standards discussed
above, a sensitivity analysis is typically conducted to determine the potential for CO “hot spots” at a
number of intersections in the general project vicinity. Because of reduced speeds and vehicle queuing,
“hot spots” potentially can occur at high traffic volume intersections with a Level of Service E or worse.
The According to the VCAPCD Ventura County Air Quality Assessment Guidelines (2003), a CO hotspot
screening analysis should be performed for any project with indirect emissions greater than the ozone
project significance threshold of 25 pounds per day that may significantly impact roadway intersections
that are currently operating at Levels of Service (LOS) E or F. A CO hotspot is a localized concentration of
CO that exceeds the federal one-hour standard of 35.0 parts per million (ppm) or the federal and State
eight-hour standard of 9.0 ppm (CARB 2016). As shown in Table 2 above, the proposed project would
generate maximum daily indirect mobile CO emissions of 12.14 pounds per day, which would not exceed
the ozone significance threshold. Therefore, a CO hotspot screening analysis is not required. Furthermore,
the Basin is in conformance with federal and State CO standards, and most air quality monitoring stations
no longer report CO levels. No stations in the vicinity of the project site have monitored CO since 2004. In
2004, the Simi Valley-Cochran Street Station detected an 8-hour maximum CO concentration of 2.62 ppm,
which is below the federal and State standard of 9.0 ppm (CARB n.d.). As shown in Table 2, the project
would generate maximum net daily CO emissions of approximately 11.71 pounds per day (after
subtraction of emissions from the existing uses being removed). Based on the low background level of CO
in the project area, ever-improving vehicle emissions standards for new cars in accordance with federal
and State regulations, and the project’s low level of operational CO emissions, the project would not result
in the creation of new CO hotspots or contribute substantially to existing CO hotspots.
C. Operations-Related Odor Impacts
Based on the VCAPCD Ventura County Air Quality Assessment Guidelines (2003), a project may have a
significant impact if a project would generate an objectionable odor to a degree that would cause injury,
detriment, nuisance, or annoyance to a considerable number of persons or to the public, or which would
endanger the comfort, repose, health, or safety of any such persons or the public, or which cause, or have
a natural tendency to cause, injury or damage to business or property. Land uses and industrial operations
known to emit objectionable odors include wastewater treatment facilities, food processing facilities,
coffee roasters, fiberglass operations, refineries, feed lots/dairies, and composting facilities. Residential
Complete Administrative Draft City of Moorpark April 2022
Beltramo Ranch Project II. Air Quality Analysis
Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Impact Analysis
21
and commercial uses are not included on this list. Therefore, no impact related to objectionable odors or
other emissions would occur.
8. AIR QUALITY COMPLIANCE
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requires a discussion of any inconsistencies between a
proposed project and applicable General Plans and Regional Plans (CEQA Guidelines Section 15125). The
regional plan that applies to the proposed project includes the Air Quality Management Plan (AQMP).
Therefore, this section discusses any potential inconsistencies of the proposed project with the AQMP.
A. Air Quality Compliance
The purpose of this discussion is to set forth the issues regarding consistency with the assumptions and
objectives of the AQMP and discuss whether the proposed project would interfere with the region’s ability
to comply with Federal and State air quality standards. If the decision-makers determine that the
proposed project is inconsistent, the lead agency may consider project modifications or inclusion of
mitigation to eliminate the inconsistency. Based on the VCAPCD Ventura County Air Quality Assessment
Guidelines (2003), a significant air quality impact may occur if the project would cause the existing
population to exceed the growth forecasts contained in the AQMP or if the project would be inconsistent
with the emission reduction strategies contained in the AQMP.
The 2016 AQMP was developed using the Southern California Association of Governments’ (SCAG)
population forecasts contained in the 2016 Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities
Strategy (2016 RTP/SCS). Moorpark has a current population of 37,044 residents with an average
household size of 3.3 persons.3 SCAG forecasts that the population of Moorpark will grow to 43,000
residents by 2040, which is an increase of 5,980 persons (16 percent) relative to the 2019 population
(SCAG 2016).
Based on the current average household size in the City, the 47 single-family dwelling unit project would
add an estimated 155 residents. Therefore, implementation of the proposed project would increase the
City’s existing population to 37,199 residents (an increase of less than one percent), which would be within
SCAG’s 2040 population forecast for Moorpark (SCAG 2016).
The City currently contains approximately 11,092 households, and SCAG forecasts that the housing stock
of Moorpark will reach 13,100 housing units by 2040 (CDOF 2019a, SCAG 2016). The 47 single-family
dwelling unit project would increase the City’s existing housing stock to 11,139 units, which is well within
SCAG’s forecasts for the City.
The project site has a current land use of high density residential (H), open space, and low density
residential (L) and is pursuing a General Plan Amendment to very high density (VH). The Project is
compliant with R-1 zoning standards; however, the project is seeking RPD zoning and high density
3 Source: https://www.moorparkca.gov/386/Population-Income-Education-Housing
Complete Administrative Draft City of Moorpark April 2022
Beltramo Ranch Project II. Air Quality Analysis
Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Impact Analysis
22
residential (R-1) zoning throughout. Therefore, the proposed project is not currently consistent with all of
the existing land use and zoning designations. However, once the Change of Zone and General Plan
Amendment are approved, the project would be consistent with the zoning and land use designations.
Although the project, Change of Zone and General Plan Amendment may initially result in an inconsistency
with the AQMP on paper, the inconsistency would not necessarily constitute a conflict with the AQMP.
Furthermore, the proposed residential use is not expected to increase the number of trips, and/or
increase the overall vehicle miles traveled in an affected area, as higher density residential uses have
lower trip generation rates than single family residential land uses. The VCAPCD acknowledges that strict
consistency with all aspects of the AQMP is not required in order to make a finding of no conflict. Rather,
a project is considered to be consistent with the AQMP if it furthers one or more policies and does not
obstruct other policies. The project would implement contemporary energy-efficient technologies and
regulatory/operational programs required per Title 24, CalGreen and City standards. Generally,
compliance with VCAPCD emissions reductions and control requirements also act to reduce project air
pollutant emissions. In combination, project emissions-reducing design features and
regulatory/operational programs are consistent with and support overarching AQMP air pollution
reduction strategies. Project support of these strategies promotes timely attainment of AQMP air quality
standards and would bring the project into conformance with the AQMP. As shown by the results of this
air analysis, the project's emissions do not exceed any VCAPCD thresholds. Therefore, the proposed
project is not anticipated to exceed the AQMP assumptions for the project site and is found to be
consistent with the AQMP.
Based on the above, the project would not conflict with the growth forecasts contained in the 2016 AQMP,
and the impact would be less than significant.
Beltramo Ranch Project III. Global Climate Change Analysis
Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Impact Analysis
23
III. GLOBAL CLIMATE CHANGE ANALYSIS
1. EXISTING GREENHOUSE GAS ENVIRONMENT
Constituent gases of the Earth’s atmosphere, called atmospheric greenhouse gases (GHG), play a critical
role in the Earth’s radiation amount by trapping infrared radiation emitted from the Earth’s surface, which
otherwise would have escaped to space. Prominent greenhouse gases contributing to this process include
carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), ozone, water vapor, nitrous oxide (N2O), and chlorofluorocarbons
(CFCs). This phenomenon, known as the Greenhouse Effect, is responsible for maintaining a habitable
climate. Anthropogenic (caused or produced by humans) emissions of these greenhouse gases in excess
of natural ambient concentrations are responsible for the enhancement of the Greenhouse Effect and
have led to a trend of unnatural warming of the Earth’s natural climate, known as global warming or
climate change. Emissions of gases that induce global warming are attributable to human activities
associated with industrial/manufacturing, agriculture, utilities, transportation, and residential land uses.
Transportation is responsible for 41 percent of the State’s greenhouse gas emissions,8 followed by
electricity generation. Emissions of CO2 and nitrous oxide (NOx) are byproducts of fossil fuel combustion.
Methane, a potent greenhouse gas, results from off-gassing associated with agricultural practices and
landfills. Sinks of CO2, where CO2 is stored outside of the atmosphere, include uptake by vegetation and
dissolution into the ocean. The following provides a description of each of the greenhouse gases and their
global warming potential.
A. Water Vapor
Water vapor is the most abundant, important, and variable GHG in the atmosphere. Water vapor is not
considered a pollutant; in the atmosphere it maintains a climate necessary for life. Changes in its
concentration are primarily considered a result of climate feedbacks related to the warming of the
atmosphere rather than a direct result of industrialization. The feedback loop in which water is involved
is critically important to projecting future climate change. As the temperature of the atmosphere rises,
more water is evaporated from ground storage (rivers, oceans, reservoirs, soil). Because the air is warmer,
the relative humidity can be higher (in essence, the air is able to “hold” more water when it is warmer),
leading to more water vapor in the atmosphere. As a GHG, the higher concentration of water vapor is
then able to absorb more thermal indirect energy radiated from the Earth, thus further warming the
atmosphere. The warmer atmosphere can then hold more water vapor and so on and so on. This is
referred to as a “positive feedback loop”. The extent to which this positive feedback loop will continue is
unknown as there is also dynamics that put the positive feedback loop in check. As an example, when
water vapor increases in the atmosphere, more of it will eventually also condense into clouds, which are
more able to reflect incoming solar radiation (thus allowing less energy to reach the Earth’s surface and
heat it up).
8 California Climate Investments (https://www.caclimateinvestments.ca.gov/about-cci)
Complete Administrative Draft City of Moorpark April 2022
Beltramo Ranch Project III. Global Climate Change Analysis
Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Impact Analysis
24
B. Carbon Dioxide (CO2)
The natural production and absorption of CO2 is achieved through the terrestrial biosphere and the ocean.
However, humankind has altered the natural carbon cycle by burning coal, oil, natural gas, and wood.
Since the industrial revolution began in the mid-1700s. Each of these activities has increased in scale and
distribution. CO2 was the first GHG demonstrated to be increasing in atmospheric concentration with the
first conclusive measurements being made in the last half of the 20th century. Prior to the industrial
revolution, concentrations were fairly stable at 280 parts per million (ppm). The International Panel on
Climate Change (IPCC Fifth Assessment Report, 2014) Emissions of CO2 from fossil fuel combustion and
industrial processes contributed about 78% of the total GHG emissions increase from 1970 to 2010, with
a similar percentage contribution for the increase during the period 2000 to 2010. Globally, economic and
population growth continued to be the most important drivers of increases in CO2 emissions from fossil
fuel combustion. The contribution of population growth between 2000 and 2010 remained roughly
identical to the previous three decades, while the contribution of economic growth has risen sharply.
C. Nitrous Oxide (N2O)
Concentrations of N2O also began to rise at the beginning of the industrial revolution. In 1998, the global
concentration of this GHG was documented at 314 parts per billion (ppb). N2O is produced by microbial
processes in soil and water, including those reactions which occur in fertilizer containing nitrogen. In
addition to agricultural sources, some industrial processes (fossil fuel-fired power plants, nylon
production, nitric acid production, and vehicle emissions) also contribute to its atmospheric load. It is also
commonly used as an aerosol spray propellant, (i.e., in whipped cream bottles, in potato chip bags to keep
chips fresh, and in rocket engines and in race cars).
D. Hydrofluorocarbons (HFC)
HFCs are synthetic man-made chemicals that are used as a substitute for CFCs. Out of all the GHGs, they
are one of three groups with the highest global warming potential. The HFCs with the largest measured
atmospheric abundances are (in order), HFC-23 (CHF3), HFC-134a (CF3CH2F), and HFC-152a (CH3CHF2).
Prior to 1990, the only significant emissions were HFC-23. HFC-134a use is increasing due to its use as a
refrigerant. Concentrations of HFC-23 and HFC-134a in the atmosphere are now about 10 parts per trillion
(ppt) each. Concentrations of HFC-152a are about 1 ppt. HFCs are manmade for applications such as
automobile air conditioners and refrigerants.
E. Perfluorocarbons (PFC)
PFCs have stable molecular structures and do not break down through the chemical processes in the lower
atmosphere. High-energy ultraviolet rays about 60 kilometers above Earth’s surface are able to destroy
the compounds. Because of this, PFCs have very long lifetimes, between 10,000 and 50,000 years. Two
common PFCs are tetrafluoromethane (CF4) and hexafluoroethane (C2F6). Concentrations of CF4 in the
Complete Administrative Draft City of Moorpark April 2022
Beltramo Ranch Project III. Global Climate Change Analysis
Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Impact Analysis
25
atmosphere are over 70 ppt. The two main sources of PFCs are primary aluminum production and
semiconductor manufacturing.
F. Sulfur Hexafluoride (SF6)
SF6 is an inorganic, odorless, colorless, nontoxic, nonflammable gas. SF6 has the highest global warming
potential of any gas evaluated; 23,900 times that of CO2. Concentrations in the 1990s were about 4 ppt.
Sulfur hexafluoride is used for insulation in electric power transmission and distribution equipment, in the
magnesium industry, in semiconductor manufacturing, and as a tracer gas for leak detection.
G. Aerosols
Aerosols are particles emitted into the air through burning biomass (plant material) and fossil fuels.
Aerosols can warm the atmosphere by absorbing and emitting heat and can cool the atmosphere by
reflecting light. Cloud formation can also be affected by aerosols. Sulfate aerosols are emitted when fuel
containing sulfur is burned. Black carbon (or soot) is emitted during biomass burning due to the
incomplete combustion of fossil fuels. Particulate matter regulation has been lowering aerosol
concentrations in the United States; however, global concentrations are likely increasing.
H. Global Warming Potential
The Global Warming Potential (GWP) was developed to allow comparisons of the global warming impacts
of different gases. Specifically, it is a measure of how much energy the emissions of 1 ton of a gas will
absorb over a given period of time, relative to the emissions of 1 ton of carbon dioxide (CO2). The larger
the GWP, the more that a given gas warms the Earth compared to CO2 over that time period. The time
period usually used for GWPs is 100 years. GWPs provide a common unit of measure, which allows
analysts to add up emissions estimates of different gases (e.g., to compile a national GHG inventory), and
allows policymakers to compare emissions reduction opportunities across sectors and gases. A summary
of the atmospheric lifetime and the global warming potential of selected gases are summarized in Table
3, Global Warming Potentials and Atmospheric Lifetimes. As shown in Table 3, the global warming
potential of GHGs ranges from 1 to 22,800.
Table 3
Global Warming Potentials and Atmospheric Lifetimes
Gas Atmospheric Lifetime
Global Warming Potential1
(100 Year Horizon)
Carbon Dioxide (CO2) __ 2 1
Methane (CH4) 12 28-36
Nitrous Oxide (NO) 114 298
Hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs) 1-270 12-14,800
Perfluorocarbons (PFCs) 2,600-50,000 7,390-12,200
Nitrogen trifluoride (NF3) 740 17,200
Complete Administrative Draft City of Moorpark April 2022
Beltramo Ranch Project III. Global Climate Change Analysis
Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Impact Analysis
26
Table 3
Global Warming Potentials and Atmospheric Lifetimes
Gas Atmospheric Lifetime
Global Warming Potential1
(100 Year Horizon)
Sulfur Hexafluoride (SF6) 3,200 22,800
Notes:
(1) Compared to the same quantity of CO2 emissions.
(2) Carbon dioxide's lifetime is poorly defined because the gas is not destroyed over time, but instead moves among different
parts of the ocean–atmosphere–land system. Some of the excess carbon dioxide will be absorbed quickly (for example, by the
ocean surface), but some will remain in the atmosphere for thousands of years, due in part to the very slow process by which
carbon is transferred to ocean sediments.
Source: http://www3.epa.gov/climatechange/ghgemissions/gases.html
2. GREENHOUSE GAS STANDARDS AND REGULATION
A. International
i) Montreal Protocol
In 1988, the United Nations established the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) to evaluate
the impacts of global climate change and to develop strategies that nations could implement to curtail
global climate change. In 1992, the United States joined other countries around the world in signing the
United Nations’ Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) agreement with the goal of
controlling GHG emissions. As a result, the Climate Change Action Plan was developed to address the
reduction of GHGs in the United States. The plan consists of more than 50 voluntary programs.
Additionally, the Montreal Protocol was originally signed in 1987 and substantially amended in 1990 and
1992. The Montreal Protocol stipulates that the production and consumption of compounds that deplete
ozone in the stratosphere—CFCs, halons, carbon tetrachloride, and methyl chloroform—were to be
phased out, with the first three by the year 2000 and methyl chloroform by 2005.
ii) The Paris Agreement
The Paris Agreement became effective on November 4, 2016. Thirty days after this date at least 55 Parties
to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (Convention), accounting in total for at
least an estimated 55 % of the total global greenhouse gas emissions, had deposited their instruments of
ratification, acceptance, approval, or accession with the Depositary.
The Paris Agreement built upon the Convention and – for the first time – attempted to bring all nations
into a common cause to undertake ambitious efforts to combat climate change and adapt to its effects,
with enhanced support to assist developing countries to do so. As such, it charts a new course in the global
climate effort.
Complete Administrative Draft City of Moorpark April 2022
Beltramo Ranch Project III. Global Climate Change Analysis
Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Impact Analysis
27
The Paris Agreement’s central aim is to strengthen the global response to the threat of climate change by
keeping a global temperature rise this century well below 2 degrees Celsius above pre-industrial levels
and to pursue efforts to limit the temperature increase even further to 1.5 degrees Celsius. Additionally,
the agreement aims to strengthen the ability of countries to deal with the impacts of climate change. To
reach these ambitious goals, appropriate financial flows, a new technology framework and an enhanced
capacity building framework will be put in place, thus supporting action by developing countries and the
most vulnerable countries, in line with their own national objectives. The Agreement also provides for
enhanced transparency of action and support through a more robust transparency framework. Although
the Trump administration withdrew the United States federal government from the Paris Agreement on
November 4, 2020, the current administration reversed course and the federal government rejoined the
Paris Agreement on January 20, 2021.
B. Federal
The United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) is responsible for implementing federal
policy to address GHGs. The federal government administers a wide array of public-private partnerships
to reduce the GHG intensity generated in the United States. These programs focus on energy efficiency,
renewable energy, methane and other non-CO2 gases, agricultural practices, and implementation of
technologies to achieve GHG reductions. The USEPA implements numerous voluntary programs that
contribute to the reduction of GHG emissions. These programs (e.g., the ENERGY STAR labeling system for
energy-efficient products) play a significant role in encouraging voluntary reductions from large
corporations, consumers, industrial and commercial buildings, and many major industrial sectors.
In Massachusetts v. Environmental Protection Agency (Docket No. 05–1120), argued November 29, 2006
and decided April 2, 2007, the U.S. Supreme Court held that not only did the EPA have authority to
regulate greenhouse gases, but the EPA's reasons for not regulating this area did not fit the statutory
requirements. As such, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that the EPA should be required to regulate CO2 and
other greenhouse gases as pollutants under the federal Clean Air Act (CAA).
In response to the FY2008 Consolidations Appropriations Act (H.R. 2764; Public Law 110-161), EPA
proposed a rule on March 10, 2009 that requires mandatory reporting of GHG emissions from large
sources in the United States. On September 22, 2009, the Final Mandatory Reporting of GHG Rule was
signed and published in the Federal Register on October 30, 2009. The rule became effective on December
29, 2009. This rule requires suppliers of fossil fuels or industrial GHGs, manufacturers of vehicles and
engines, and facilities that emit 25,000 metric tons or more per year of GHG emissions to submit annual
reports to EPA.
On December 7, 2009, the EPA Administrator signed two distinct findings under section 202(a) of the
Clean Air Act. One is an endangerment finding that finds concentrations of the six GHGs in the atmosphere
Complete Administrative Draft City of Moorpark April 2022
Beltramo Ranch Project III. Global Climate Change Analysis
Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Impact Analysis
28
threaten the public health and welfare of current and future generations. The other is a cause or
contribute finding, that finds emissions from new motor vehicles and new motor vehicle engines
contribute to the GHG pollution which threatens public health and welfare. These actions will not
themselves impose any requirements on industry or other entities. However, it is a prerequisite to
finalizing the EPA’s proposed GHG emission standards for light-duty vehicles, which were jointly proposed
by the EPA and Department of Transportation on September 15, 2009.
i) Clean Air Act
In Massachusetts v. Environmental Protection Agency (Docket No. 05–1120), the U.S. Supreme Court held
in April of 2007 that the USEPA has statutory authority under Section 202 of the federal Clean Air Act
(CAA) to regulate GHGs. The court did not hold that the USEPA was required to regulate GHG emissions;
however, it indicated that the agency must decide whether GHGs cause or contribute to air pollution that
is reasonably anticipated to endanger public health or welfare. On December 7, 2009, the USEPA
Administrator signed two distinct findings regarding GHGs under Section 202(a) of the CAA. The USEPA
adopted a Final Endangerment Finding for the six defined GHGs (CO2, CH4, N2O, HFCs, PFCs, and SF6) on
December 7, 2009. The Endangerment Finding is required before USEPA can regulate GHG emissions
under Section 202(a)(1) of the CAA consistently with the United States Supreme Court decision. The
USEPA also adopted a Cause or Contribute Finding in which the USEPA Administrator found that GHG
emissions from new motor vehicle and motor vehicle engines are contributing to air pollution, which is
endangering public health and welfare. These findings do not, by themselves, impose any requirements
on industry or other entities. However, these actions were a prerequisite for implementing GHG emissions
standards for vehicles.
ii) Energy Independence Security Act
The Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007 (EISA) facilitates the reduction of national GHG
emissions by requiring the following:
§ Increasing the supply of alternative fuel sources by setting a mandatory Renewable Fuel Standard
(RFS) that requires fuel producers to use at least 36 billion gallons of biofuel in 2022;
§ Prescribing or revising standards affecting regional efficiency for heating and cooling products,
procedures for new or amended standards, energy conservation, energy efficiency labeling for
consumer electronic products, residential boiler efficiency, electric motor efficiency, and home
appliances;
§ Requiring approximately 25 percent greater efficiency for light bulbs by phasing out incandescent
light bulbs between 2012 and 2014; requiring approximately 200 percent greater efficiency for
light bulbs, or similar energy savings, by 2020; and
Complete Administrative Draft City of Moorpark April 2022
Beltramo Ranch Project III. Global Climate Change Analysis
Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Impact Analysis
29
§ While superseded by the USEPA and NHTSA actions described above, (i) establishing miles per
gallon targets for cars and light trucks and (ii) directing the NHTSA to establish a fuel economy
program for medium- and heavy-duty trucks and create a separate fuel economy standard for
trucks.
Additional provisions of EISA address energy savings in government and public institutions, promote
research for alternative energy, additional research in carbon capture, international energy programs, and
the creation of green jobs.9
iii) Executive Order 13432
In response to the Massachusetts v. Environmental Protection Agency ruling, the President signed
Executive Order 13432 on May 14, 2007, directing the USEPA, along with the Departments of
Transportation, Energy, and Agriculture, to initiate a regulatory process that responds to the Supreme
Court’s decision. Executive Order 13432 was codified into law by the 2009 Omnibus Appropriations Law
signed on February 17, 2009. The order sets goals in the areas of energy efficiency, acquisition, renewable
energy, toxics reductions, recycling, sustainable buildings, electronics stewardship, fleets, and water
conservation. Light-Duty Vehicle Greenhouse Gas and Corporate Average Fuel Economy Standards.
On May 19, 2009, President Obama announced a national policy for fuel efficiency and emissions
standards in the United States auto industry. The adopted federal standard applies to passenger cars and
light-duty trucks for model years 2012 through 2016. The rule surpasses the prior Corporate Average Fuel
Economy standards (CAFE)10 and requires an average fuel economy standard of 35.5 miles per gallon
(mpg) and 250 grams of CO2 per mile by model year 2016, based on USEPA calculation methods. These
standards were formally adopted on April 1, 2010. In August 2012, standards were adopted for model
year 2017 through 2025 for passenger cars and light-duty trucks. By 2025, vehicles are required to achieve
54.5 mpg (if GHG reductions are achieved exclusively through fuel economy improvements) and 163
grams of CO2 per mile. According to the USEPA, a model year 2025 vehicle would emit one-half of the
GHG emissions from a model year 2010 vehicle.11 In 2017, the USEPA recommended no change to the
GHG standards for light-duty vehicles for model years 2022-2025.
In August 2018, the USEPA and NHTSA proposed the Safer Affordable Fuel-Efficient Vehicles Rule that
would, if adopted, maintain the CAFE and CO2 standards applicable in model year 2020 for model years
9 A green job, as defined by the United States Department of Labor, is a job in business that produces goods or provides services
that benefit the environment or conserve natural resources.
10 The Corporate Average Fuel Economy standards are regulations in the United States, first enacted by Congress in 1975, to
improve the average fuel economy of cars and light trucks. The U.S Department of Transportation has delegated the
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration as the regulatory agency for the Corporate Average Fuel Economy
standards.
11 United States Environmental Protection Agency, EPA and NHTSA Set Standards to Reduce Greenhouse Gases and Improve
Fuel Economy for Model Years 2017-2025 Cars and Light Trucks, August 2012, https://nepis.epa.gov/
Exe/ZyPDF.cgi/P100EZ7C.PDF?Dockey=P100EZ7C.PDF.
Complete Administrative Draft City of Moorpark April 2022
Beltramo Ranch Project III. Global Climate Change Analysis
Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Impact Analysis
30
2021 through 2026. The estimated CAFE and CO2 standards for model year 2020 are 43.7 mpg and 204
grams of CO2 per mile for passenger cars and 31.3 mpg and 284 grams of CO2 per mile for light trucks,
projecting an overall industry average of 37 mpg, as compared to 46.7 mpg under the standards issued in
2012. The proposal, if adopted, would also exclude CO2- equivalent emission improvements associated
with air conditioning refrigerants and leakage (and, optionally, offsets for nitrous oxide and methane
emissions) after model year 2020.12
C. State of California
i) California Air Resources Board
CARB, a part of the California Environmental Protection Agency (CalEPA), is responsible for the
coordination and administration of both federal and state air pollution control programs within California.
In this capacity, CARB conducts research, sets state ambient air quality standards (California Ambient Air
Quality Standards [CAAQS]), compiles emission inventories, develops suggested control measures, and
provides oversight of local programs. CARB establishes emissions standards for motor vehicles sold in
California, consumer products (such as hairspray, aerosol paints, and barbecue lighter fluid), and various
types of commercial equipment. It also sets fuel specifications to further reduce vehicular emissions.
In 2004, the California Air Resources Board (CARB) adopted an Airborne Toxic Control Measure to limit
heavy-duty diesel motor vehicle idling in order to reduce public exposure to diesel particulate matter and
other toxic air contaminants (Title 13 California Code of Regulations [CCR], Section 2485). The measure
applies to diesel-fueled commercial vehicles with gross vehicle weight ratings greater than 10,000 pounds
that are licensed to operate on highways, regardless of where they are registered. This measure generally
does not allow diesel-fueled commercial vehicles to idle for more than 5 minutes at any given location
with certain exemptions for equipment in which idling is a necessary function such as concrete trucks.
While this measure primarily targets diesel particulate matter emissions, it has co-benefits of minimizing
GHG emissions from unnecessary truck idling.
In 2008, CARB approved the Truck and Bus regulation to reduce particulate matter and nitrogen oxide
emissions from existing diesel vehicles operating in California (13 CCR, Section 2025, subsection (h)). CARB
has also promulgated emission standards for off-road diesel construction equipment of greater than 25
horsepower such as bulldozers, loaders, backhoes, and forklifts, as well as many other self-propelled off-
road diesel vehicles. The regulation, adopted by the CARB on July 26, 2007, aims to reduce emissions by
installation of diesel soot filters and encouraging the retirement, replacement, or repower of older, dirtier
engines with newer emission-controlled models. While these regulations primarily target reductions in
12 National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) and U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA), 2018. Federal
Register / Vol. 83, No. 165 / Friday, August 24, 2018 / Proposed Rules, The Safer Affordable Fuel-Efficient (SAFE) Vehicles
Rule for Model Years 2021–2026 Passenger Cars and Light Trucks 2018. Available at: https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-
2018-08-24/pdf/2018-16820.pdf.
Complete Administrative Draft City of Moorpark April 2022
Beltramo Ranch Project III. Global Climate Change Analysis
Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Impact Analysis
31
criteria air pollutant emission, they have co-benefits of minimizing GHG emissions due to improved engine
efficiencies.
The State currently has no regulations that establish ambient air quality standards for GHGs. However,
the State has passed laws directing CARB to develop actions to reduce GHG emissions, which are listed
below.
ii) Assembly Bill 1493
California Assembly Bill 1493 enacted on July 22, 2002, required the CARB to develop and adopt
regulations that reduce GHGs emitted by passenger vehicles and light duty trucks. In 2005, the CARB
submitted a “waiver” request to the EPA from a portion of the federal Clean Air Act in order to allow the
State to set more stringent tailpipe emission standards for CO2 and other GHG emissions from passenger
vehicles and light duty trucks. On December 19, 2007 the EPA announced that it denied the “waiver”
request. On January 21, 2009, CARB submitted a letter to the EPA administrator regarding the State’s
request to reconsider the waiver denial. The EPA approved the waiver on June 30, 2009.
iii) Executive Order S-3-05
The California Governor issued Executive Order S-3-05, GHG Emission, in June 2005, which established the
following reduction targets:
§ By 2010, California shall reduce GHG emissions to 2000 levels;
§ By 2020, California shall reduce GHG emissions to 1990 levels; and
§ By 2050, California shall reduce GHG emissions to 80 percent below 1990 levels.
The Executive Order directed the secretary of the California Environmental Protection Agency (CalEPA) to
coordinate a multi-agency effort to reduce GHG emissions to the target levels. To comply with the Executive
Order, the secretary of CalEPA created the California Climate Action Team (CAT), made up of members from
various state agencies and commissions. The team released its first report in March 2006. The report proposed
to achieve the targets by building on the voluntary actions of businesses, local governments, and communities
and through State incentive and regulatory programs.
iv) Assembly Bill 32 (California Health and Safety Code, Division 25.2. – California
Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006
In 2006, the California State Legislature adopted Assembly Bill (AB) 32 (codified in the California Health
and Safety Code [HSC], Division 25.5 – California Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006), which focuses on
reducing GHG emissions in California to 1990 levels by 2020. HSC Division 25.5 defines GHGs as CO2, CH4,
N2O, HFCs, PFCs, and SF6 and represents the first enforceable statewide program to limit emissions of
these GHGs from all major industries with penalties for noncompliance. The law further requires that
Complete Administrative Draft City of Moorpark April 2022
Beltramo Ranch Project III. Global Climate Change Analysis
Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Impact Analysis
32
reduction measures be technologically feasible and cost effective. Under HSC Division 25.5, CARB has the
primary responsibility for reducing GHG emissions. CARB is required to adopt rules and regulations
directing state actions that would achieve GHG emissions reductions equivalent to 1990 statewide levels
by 2020.
v) Senate Bill 32 and Assembly Bill 197
In 2016, the California State Legislature adopted Senate Bill (SB) 32 and its companion bill AB 197, and
both were signed by Governor Brown. SB 32 and AB 197 amends HSC Division 25.5 and establishes a new
climate pollution reduction target of 40 percent below 1990 levels by 2030 and includes provisions to
ensure the benefits of state climate policies reach into disadvantaged communities.
vi) Climate Change Scoping Plan (2008)
A specific requirement of AB 32 was to prepare a Climate Change Scoping Plan for achieving the maximum
technologically feasible and cost-effective GHG emission reduction by 2020 (Health and Safety Code
section 38561 (h)). CARB developed an AB 32 Scoping Plan that contains strategies to achieve the 2020
emissions cap. The initial Scoping Plan was approved in 2008, and contains a mix of recommended
strategies that combined direct regulations, market-based approaches, voluntary measures, policies, and
other emission reduction programs calculated to meet the 2020 statewide GHG emission limit and initiate
the transformations needed to achieve the State’s long-range climate objectives.
As required by HSC Division 25.5, CARB approved the 1990 GHG emissions inventory, thereby establishing
the emissions limit for 2020. The 2020 emissions limit was originally set at 427 MMTCO2e using the GWP
values from the IPCC SAR. CARB also projected the state’s 2020 GHG emissions under no-action-taken
(NAT) conditions – that is, emissions that would occur without any plans, policies, or regulations to reduce
GHG emissions. CARB originally used an average of the state’s GHG emissions from 2002 through 2004
and projected the 2020 levels at approximately 596 MMTCO2e (using GWP values from the IPCC SAR).
Therefore, under the original projections, the state must reduce its 2020 NAT emissions by 28.4 percent
in order to meet the 1990 target of 427 MMTCO2e.
vii) First Update to the Climate Change Scoping Plan (2014)
The First Update to the Scoping Plan was approved by CARB in May 2014 and builds upon the initial
Scoping Plan with new strategies and recommendations. In 2014, CARB revised the target using the GWP
values from the IPCC AR4 and determined that the 1990 GHG emissions inventory and 2020 GHG
emissions limit is 431 MMTCO2e. CARB also updated the State’s 2020 NAT emissions estimate to account
for the effect of the 2007–2009 economic recession, new estimates for future fuel and energy demand,
and the reductions required by regulation that were recently adopted for motor vehicles and renewable
energy. CARB’s projected statewide 2020 emissions estimate using the GWP values from the IPCC AR4 is
509.4 MMTCO2e.
Complete Administrative Draft City of Moorpark April 2022
Beltramo Ranch Project III. Global Climate Change Analysis
Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Impact Analysis
33
viii) 2017 Climate Change Scoping Plan
In response to the 2030 GHG reduction target, CARB adopted the 2017 Climate Change Scoping Plan at a
public meeting held in December 2017. The 2017 Scoping Plan outlines the strategies the State will
implement to achieve the 2030 GHG reduction target of 40 percent below 1990 levels. The 2017 Scoping
Plan also addresses GHG emissions from natural and working lands of California, including the agriculture
and forestry sectors. The 2017 Scoping Plan considered the Scoping Plan Scenario and four alternatives
for achieving the required GHG reductions but ultimately selected the Scoping Plan Scenario.
CARB states that the Scoping Plan Scenario “is the best choice to achieve the State’s climate and clean air
goals.”13 Under the Scoping Plan Scenario, the majority of the reductions would result from the
continuation of the Cap-and-Trade regulation. Additional reductions are achieved from electricity sector
standards (i.e., utility providers to supply at least 50 percent renewable electricity by 2030), doubling the
energy efficiency savings at end uses, additional reductions from the LCFS, implementing the short-lived
GHG strategy (e.g., hydrofluorocarbons), and implementing the mobile source strategy and sustainable
freight action plan. The alternatives were designed to consider various combinations of these programs,
as well as consideration of a carbon tax in the event the Cap-and-Trade regulation is not continued.
However, in July 2017, the California Legislature voted to extend the Cap-and-Trade regulation to 2030.
Implementing this Scoping Plan will ensure that California’s climate actions continue to promote
innovation, drive the generation of new jobs, and achieve continued reductions of smog and air toxics.
The ambitious approach draws on a decade of successful programs that address the major sources of
climate-changing gases in every sector of the economy:
§ More Clean Cars and Trucks: The plan sets out far-reaching programs to incentivize the sale of
millions of zero-emission vehicles, drive the deployment of zero-emission trucks, and shift to a
cleaner system of handling freight statewide.
§ Increased Renewable Energy: California’s electric utilities are ahead of schedule meeting the
requirement that 33 percent of electricity come from renewable sources by 2020. The Scoping
Plan guides utilities to 50 percent renewables, as required under SB 350.
§ Slashing Super-Pollutants: The plan calls for a significant cut in super-pollutants such as methane
and HFC refrigerants, which are responsible for as much as 40 percent of global warming.
§ Cleaner Industry and Electricity: California’s renewed cap-and-trade program extends the
declining cap on emissions from utilities and industries and the carbon allowance auctions. The
auctions will continue to fund investments in clean energy and efficiency, particularly in
disadvantaged communities.
13 California Air Resources Board, California’s 2017 Climate Change Scoping Plan, November 2017,
https://www.arb.ca.gov/cc/scopingplan/scoping_plan_2017.pdf
Complete Administrative Draft City of Moorpark April 2022
Beltramo Ranch Project III. Global Climate Change Analysis
Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Impact Analysis
34
§ Cleaner Fuels: The Low Carbon Fuel Standard will drive further development of cleaner,
renewable transportation fuels to replace fossil fuels.
§ Smart Community Planning: Local communities will continue developing plans which will further
link transportation and housing policies to create sustainable communities.
§ Improved Agriculture and Forests: The Scoping Plan also outlines innovative programs to account
for and reduce emissions from agriculture, as well as forests and other natural lands.
The 2017 Scoping Plan also evaluates reductions of smog-causing pollutants through California’s climate
programs.
ix) Senate Bill 32, California Global Warming Solutions Act 2006
(1) The California Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006 designates the State Air Resources Board as the
state agency charged with monitoring and regulating sources of emissions of greenhouse gases. The
state board is required to approve a statewide greenhouse gas emissions limit equivalent to the
statewide greenhouse gas emissions level in 1990 to be achieved by 2020 and to adopt rules and
regulations in an open public process to achieve the maximum, technologically feasible, and cost-
effective greenhouse gas emissions reductions. This bill would require the state board to ensure that
statewide greenhouse gas emissions are reduced to 40% below the 1990 level by 2030.
(2) This bill would become operative only if AB 197 of the 2015–16 Regular Session is enacted and
becomes effective on or before January 1, 2017. AB 197 requires that the California Air Resources
Board, which directs implementation of emission-reduction programs, should target direct reductions
at both stationary and mobile sources. AB 197 of the 2015-2016 Regular Session was approved on
September 8, 2016.
x) Executive Order S-1-07
Executive Order S-1-07 was issued in 2007 and proclaims that the transportation sector is the main source
of GHG emissions in the State, since it generates more than 40 percent of the State’s GHG emissions. It
establishes a goal to reduce the carbon intensity of transportation fuels sold in the State by at least ten
percent by 2020. This Order also directs the CARB to determine whether this Low Carbon Fuel Standard
(LCFS) could be adopted as a discrete early-action measure as part of the effort to meet the mandates in
AB 32.
On April 23, 2009, the CARB approved the proposed regulation to implement the low carbon fuel
standard. The low carbon fuel standard is anticipated to reduce GHG emissions by about 16 MMT per year
by 2020. The low carbon fuel standard is designed to provide a framework that uses market mechanisms
to spur the steady introduction of lower carbon fuels. The framework establishes performance standards
that fuel producers and importers must meet each year beginning in 2011. Separate standards are
Complete Administrative Draft City of Moorpark April 2022
Beltramo Ranch Project III. Global Climate Change Analysis
Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Impact Analysis
35
established for gasoline and diesel fuels and the alternative fuels that can replace each. The standards are
“back-loaded”, with more reductions required in the last five years, than during the first five years. This
schedule allows for the development of advanced fuels that are lower in carbon than today’s fuels and
the market penetration of plug-in hybrid electric vehicles, battery electric vehicles, fuel cell vehicles, and
flexible fuel vehicles. It is anticipated that compliance with the low carbon fuel standard will be based on
a combination of both lower carbon fuels and more efficient vehicles.
Reformulated gasoline mixed with corn-derived ethanol at ten percent by volume and low sulfur diesel
fuel represent the baseline fuels. Lower carbon fuels may be ethanol, biodiesel, renewable diesel, or
blends of these fuels with gasoline or diesel as appropriate. Compressed natural gas and liquefied natural
gas also may be low carbon fuels. Hydrogen and electricity, when used in fuel cells or electric vehicles are
also considered as low carbon fuels for the low carbon fuel standard.
xi) Senate Bill 97
Senate Bill 97 (SB 97) was adopted August 2007 and acknowledges that climate change is a prominent
environmental issue that requires analysis under CEQA. SB 97 directed the Governor’s Office of Planning
and Research (OPR), which is part of the State Natural Resources Agency, to prepare, develop, and
transmit to the CARB guidelines for the feasible mitigation of GHG emissions or the effects of GHG
emissions, as required by CEQA, by July 1, 2009. The Natural Resources Agency was required to certify
and adopt those guidelines by January 1, 2010.
Pursuant to the requirements of SB 97 as stated above, on December 30, 2009, the Natural Resources
Agency adopted amendments to the state CEQA guidelines that address GHG emissions. The CEQA
Guidelines Amendments changed 14 sections of the CEQA Guidelines and incorporate GHG language
throughout the Guidelines. However, no GHG emissions thresholds of significance were provided and no
specific mitigation measures were identified. The GHG emission reduction amendments went into effect
on March 18, 2010, and are summarized below:
§ Climate action plans and other greenhouse gas reduction plans can be used to determine whether
a project has significant impacts, based upon its compliance with the plan.
§ Local governments are encouraged to quantify the greenhouse gas emissions of proposed
projects, noting that they have the freedom to select the models and methodologies that best
meet their needs and circumstances. The section also recommends consideration of several
qualitative factors that may be used in the determination of significance, such as the extent to
which the given project complies with state, regional, or local GHG reduction plans and policies.
OPR does not set or dictate specific thresholds of significance. Consistent with existing CEQA
Guidelines, OPR encourages local governments to develop and publish their own thresholds of
significance for GHG impacts assessment.
Complete Administrative Draft City of Moorpark April 2022
Beltramo Ranch Project III. Global Climate Change Analysis
Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Impact Analysis
36
§ When creating their own thresholds of significance, local governments may consider the
thresholds of significance adopted or recommended by other public agencies, or recommended
by experts.
§ New amendments include guidelines for determining methods to mitigate the effects of
greenhouse gas emissions in Appendix F of the CEQA Guidelines.
§ OPR is clear to state that “to qualify as mitigation, specific measures from an existing plan must
be identified and incorporated into the project; general compliance with a plan, by itself, is not
mitigation”.
§ OPR’s emphasizes the advantages of analyzing GHG impacts on an institutional, programmatic
level. OPR therefore approves tiering of environmental analyses and highlights some benefits of
such an approach.
§ Environmental impact reports (EIRs) must specifically consider a project's energy use and energy
efficiency potential.
xii) Senate Bill 100
Senate Bill 100 (SB 100) requires 100 percent of total retail sales of electricity in California to come from
eligible renewable energy resources and zero-carbon resources by December 31, 2045. SB 100 was
adopted September 2018.
The interim thresholds from prior Senate Bills and Executive Orders would also remain in effect. These
include Senate Bill 1078 (SB 1078), which requires retail sellers of electricity, including investor-owned
utilities and community choice aggregators, to provide at least 20 percent of their supply from renewable
sources by 2017. Senate Bill 107 (SB 107) which changed the target date to 2010. Executive Order S-14-
08, which was signed on November 2008 and expanded the State’s Renewable Energy Standard to 33
percent renewable energy by 2020. Executive Order S-21-09 directed the CARB to adopt regulations by
July 31, 2010 to enforce S-14-08. Senate Bill X1-2 codifies the 33 percent renewable energy requirement
by 2020
xiii) Senate Bill 375
Senate Bill 375 (SB 375) was adopted September 2008 and aligns regional transportation planning efforts,
regional GHG emission reduction targets, and land use and housing allocation. SB 375 requires
Metropolitan Planning Organizations (MPO) to adopt a sustainable communities strategy (SCS) or
alternate planning strategy (APS) that will prescribe land use allocation in that MPOs Regional
Transportation Plan (RTP). The CARB, in consultation with each MPO, will provide each affected region
with reduction targets for GHGs emitted by passenger cars and light trucks in the region for the years
2020 and 2035. These reduction targets will be updated every eight years but can be updated every four
years if advancements in emissions technologies affect the reduction strategies to achieve the targets.
The CARB is also charged with reviewing each MPO’s sustainable communities strategy or alternate
planning strategy for consistency with its assigned targets.
Complete Administrative Draft City of Moorpark April 2022
Beltramo Ranch Project III. Global Climate Change Analysis
Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Impact Analysis
37
The proposed project is located within the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG)
jurisdiction, which has authority to develop the SCS or APS. For the SCAG region, the targets set by the
CARB are at eight percent below 2005 per capita GHG emissions levels by 2020 and 19 percent below
2005 per capita GHG emissions levels by 2035. These reduction targets became effective October 2018.
xiv) Senate Bill X7-7
Senate Bill X7-7 (SB X7-7), enacted on November 9, 2009, mandates water conservation targets and
efficiency improvements for urban and agricultural water suppliers. SB X7-7 requires the Department of
Water Resources (DWR) to develop a task force and technical panel to develop alternative best
management practices for the water sector. In addition, SB X7-7 required the DWR to develop criteria for
baseline uses for residential, commercial, and industrial uses for both indoor and landscaped area uses.
The DWR was also required to develop targets and regulations that achieve a statewide 20 percent
reduction in water usage.
xv) Assembly Bill 939 and Senate Bill 1374
Assembly Bill 939 (AB 939) requires that each jurisdiction in California to divert at least 50 percent of its
waste away from landfills, whether through waste reduction, recycling, or other means. Senate Bill 1374
(SB 1374) requires the California Integrated Waste Management Board to adopt a model ordinance by
March 1, 2004, suitable for adoption by any local agency to require 50 to 75 percent diversion of
construction and demolition of waste materials from landfills.
xvi) California Code of Regulations (CCR) Title 24
CCR Title 24, Part 6: California’s Energy Efficiency Standards for Residential and Nonresidential Buildings
(Title 24) were first established in 1978 in response to a legislative mandate to reduce California’s energy
consumption. The standards are updated periodically to allow consideration and possible incorporation
of new energy efficiency technologies and methods. Although it was not originally intended to reduce
GHG emissions, electricity production by fossil fuels results in GHG emissions and energy efficient
buildings require less electricity. Therefore, increased energy efficiency results in decreased GHG
emissions.
The Energy Commission adopted 2008 Standards on April 23, 2008, and Building Standards Commission
approved them for publication on September 11, 2008. These updates became effective on August 1,
2009. 2013 Standards were approved and have been effective since July 1, 2014. 2016 Standards were
adopted January 1, 2017. 2019 standards were published July 1, 2019 and became effective January 1,
2020.
All buildings for which an application for a building permit is submitted on or after January 1, 2020 must
follow the 2019 standards. The 2016 residential standards were estimated to be approximately 28 percent
Complete Administrative Draft City of Moorpark April 2022
Beltramo Ranch Project III. Global Climate Change Analysis
Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Impact Analysis
38
more efficient than the 2013 standards, whereas the 2019 residential standards are estimated to be
approximately 7 percent more efficient than the 2016 standards. The California solar initiative mandate
requires new construction homes to have a solar photovoltaic (PV) system as an electricity source. This
code, which went into effect on January 1, 2020, applies to both single-family homes and multi-family
homes that are up to three stories high. Once rooftop solar electricity generation is factored in, 2019
residential standards are estimated to be approximately 53 percent more efficient than the 2016
standards. Under the 2019 standards, nonresidential buildings are estimated to be approximately 30
percent more efficient than the 2016 standards 14 . Energy efficient buildings require less electricity;
therefore, increased energy efficiency reduces fossil fuel consumption and decreases greenhouse gas
emissions.
xvii) California Green Building Standards
2019 CALGreen Code: During the 2019-2020 fiscal year, the HCD updated CALGreen through the 2019
Triennial Code Adoption Cycle.
HCD modified the best management practices for stormwater pollution prevention adding Section 5.106.2
for projects that disturb one or more acres of land. This section requires projects that disturb one acre or
more of land or less than one acre of land but are part of a larger common plan of development or sale
must comply with the postconstruction requirement detailed in the applicable National Pollutant
Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Permit for Stormwater Discharges Associated with
Construction and Land Disturbance Activities issued by the State Water Resources Control Board. The
NPDES permits require postconstruction runoff (post-project hydrology) to match the preconstruction
runoff pre-project hydrology) with installation of postconstruction stormwater management measures.
HCD added sections 5.106.4.1.3 and 5.106.4.1.5 in regards to bicycle parking. Section 5.106.4.1.3 requires
new buildings with tenant spaces that have 10 or more tenant-occupants, provide secure bicycle parking
for 5 percent of the tenant-occupant vehicular parking spaces with a minimum of one bicycle parking
facility. In addition, Section 5.106.4.1.5 states that acceptable bicycle parking facility for Sections
5.106.4.1.2 through 5.106.4.1.4 shall be convenient from the street and shall meeting one of the
following: (1) covered, lockable enclosures with permanently anchored racks for bicycles; (2) lockable
bicycle rooms with permanently anchored racks; or (3) lockable, permanently anchored bicycle lockers.
HCD amended section 5.106.5.3.5 allowing future charging spaces to qualify as designated parking for
clean air vehicles.
14 California Energy Commission, Efficiency Division, 2019 Building Energy Efficiency Standards, Frequently Asked Questions,
website: https://www.energy.ca.gov/sites/default/files/2020-03/Title_24_2019_Building_Standards_FAQ_ada.pdf,
accessed: December 11, 2020.
Complete Administrative Draft City of Moorpark April 2022
Beltramo Ranch Project III. Global Climate Change Analysis
Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Impact Analysis
39
HCD updated section 5.303.3.3 in regards to showerhead flow rates. This update reduced the flow rate to
1.8 GPM.
HCD amended section 5.304.1 for outdoor potable water use in landscape areas and repealed sections
5.304.2 and 5.304.3. The update requires nonresidential developments to comply with a local water
efficient landscape ordinance or the current California Department of Water Resource’s’ Model Water
Efficient Landscape Ordinance (MWELO), whichever is more stringent. Some updates were also made in
regards to the outdoor potable water use in landscape areas for public schools and community colleges.
HCD updated Section 5.504.5.3 in regards to the use of MERV filters in mechanically ventilated buildings.
This update changed the filter use from MERV 8 to MERV 13. MERV 13 filters are to be installed prior to
occupancy, and recommendations for maintenance with filters of the same value shall be included in the
operation and maintenance manual.
xviii) Executive Order B-30-15
On April 29, 2015, Governor Brown issued Executive Order B-30-15. Therein, the Governor directed the
following:
§ Established a new interim statewide reduction target to reduce GHG emissions to 40 percent
below 1990 levels by 2030.
§ Ordered all state agencies with jurisdiction over sources of GHG emissions to implement
measures to achieve reductions of GHG emissions to meet the 2030 and 2050 reduction targets.
§ Directed CARB to update the Climate Change Scoping Plan to express the 2030 target in terms of
million metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalent.
xix) Executive Order B-29-15
Executive Order B-29-15, mandates a statewide 25 percent reduction in potable water usage. EO B-29-15
signed into law on April 1, 2015.
xx) Executive Order B-37-16
Executive Order B-37-16, continuing the State's adopted water reductions, was signed into law on May 9,
2016. The water reductions build off the mandatory 25 percent reduction called for in EO B-29-15.
xxi) Senate Bill X1 2
Signed into law in April 2011, Senate Bill (SB)X1 2, requires one-third of the State’s electricity to come
from renewable sources. The legislation increases California’s current 20 percent renewables portfolio
standard target in 2010 to a 33 percent renewables portfolio standard by December 31, 2020.
Complete Administrative Draft City of Moorpark April 2022
Beltramo Ranch Project III. Global Climate Change Analysis
Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Impact Analysis
40
xxii) Senate Bill 350
Signed into law October 7, 2015, SB 350 increases California’s renewable electricity procurement goal
from 33 percent by 2020 to 50 percent by 2030. This will increase the use of Renewables Portfolio
Standard (RPS) eligible resources, including solar, wind, biomass, geothermal, and others. In addition, SB
350 requires the state to double statewide energy efficiency savings in electricity and natural gas end uses
by 2030. To help ensure these goals are met and the greenhouse gas emission reductions are realized,
large utilities will be required to develop and submit Integrated Resource Plans (IRPs). These IRPs will
detail how each entity will meet their customers resource needs, reduce greenhouse gas emissions, and
ramp up the deployment of clean energy resources.
xxiii) Energy Sector and CEQA Guidelines Appendix F
The CEC first adopted Energy Efficiency Standards for Residential and Nonresidential Buildings (CCR, Title
24, Part 6) in 1978 in response to a legislative mandate to reduce energy consumption in the state.
Although not originally intended to reduce GHG emissions, increased energy efficiency and reduced
consumption of electricity, natural gas, and other fuels would result in fewer GHG emissions from
residential and nonresidential buildings subject to the standard. The standards are updated periodically
(typically every three years) to allow for the consideration and inclusion of new energy efficiency
technologies and methods. The 2019 update to the Energy Efficiency Standards for Residential and
Nonresidential Buildings focuses on several key areas to improve the energy efficiency of renovations and
addition to existing buildings as well as newly constructed buildings and renovations and additions to
existing buildings. The major efficiency improvements to the residential Standards involve improvements
for attics, walls, water heating, and lighting, whereas the major efficiency improvements to the
nonresidential Standards include alignment with the American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-
Conditioning Engineers (ASHRAE) 90.1-2013 national standards. Furthermore, the 2019 update requires
that enforcement agencies determine compliance with CCR, Title 24, Part 6 before issuing building permits
for any construction.15
Part 11 of the Title 24 Building Energy Efficiency Standards is referred to as the California Green Building
Standards (CALGreen) Code. The purpose of the CALGreen Code is to “improve public health, safety and
general welfare by enhancing the design and construction of buildings through the use of building
concepts having a reduced negative impact or positive environmental impact and encouraging sustainable
construction practices in the following categories: (1) Planning and design; (2) Energy efficiency; (3) Water
efficiency and conservation; (4) Material conservation and resource efficiency; and (5) Environmental air
quality.”16 As of January 1, 2011, the CALGreen Code is mandatory for all new buildings constructed in
15 California Energy Commission, 2016 Building Energy Efficiency Standards, June 2015,
http://www.energy.ca.gov/2015publications/CEC-400-2015-037/CEC-400-2015-037-CMF.pdf
16 California Building Standards Commission, 2010 California Green Building Standards Code, (2010).
Complete Administrative Draft City of Moorpark April 2022
Beltramo Ranch Project III. Global Climate Change Analysis
Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Impact Analysis
41
the state. The CALGreen Code establishes mandatory measures for new residential and non-residential
buildings. Such mandatory measures include energy efficiency, water conservation, material
conservation, planning and design, and overall environmental quality. The CALGreen Code was most
recently updated in 2019 to include new mandatory measures for residential and nonresidential uses; the
new measures took effect on January 1, 2020.
D. Regional – Ventura County Air Pollution Control District
The VCAPCD has not adopted GHG emissions thresholds. Therefore, per VCAPCD guidance17 this analysis
uses the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) draft GHG emissions threshold of 3,000
MTCO2e/year for all land uses.
i) SCAQMD Regulation XXVII, Climate Change
SCAQMD Regulation XXVII currently includes three rules:
§ The purpose of Rule 2700 is to define terms and post global warming potentials.
§ The purpose of Rule 2701, SoCal Climate Solutions Exchange, is to establish a voluntary program
to encourage, quantify, and certify voluntary, high quality certified greenhouse gas emission
reductions in the SCAQMD.
§ Rule 2702, Greenhouse Gas Reduction Program, was adopted on February 6, 2009. The purpose
of this rule is to create a Greenhouse Gas Reduction Program for greenhouse gas emission
reductions in the SCAQMD. The SCAQMD will fund projects through contracts in response to
requests for proposals or purchase reductions from other parties.
A variety of agencies have developed greenhouse gas emission thresholds and/or have made
recommendations for how to identify a threshold. However, the thresholds for projects in the jurisdiction
of the SCAQMD remain in flux. The California Air Pollution Control Officers Association explored a variety
of threshold approaches, but did not recommend one approach (2008). The ARB recommended
approaches for setting interim significance thresholds (California Air Resources Board 2008b), in which a
draft industrial project threshold suggests that non-transportation related emissions under 7,000
MTCO2e per year would be less than significant; however, the ARB has not approved those thresholds
and has not published anything since then. The SCAQMD is in the process of developing thresholds, as
discussed below.
ii) SCAQMD Threshold Development
On December 5, 2008, the SCAQMD Governing Board adopted an interim greenhouse gas significance
threshold for stationary sources, rules, and plans where the SCAQMD is lead agency (SCAQMD permit
17 http://www.vcapcd.org/pubs/Planning/GHGThresholdReportRevised.pdf
Complete Administrative Draft City of Moorpark April 2022
Beltramo Ranch Project III. Global Climate Change Analysis
Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Impact Analysis
42
threshold). The SCAQMD permit threshold consists of five tiers. However, the SCAQMD is not the lead
agency for this project. Therefore, the five permit threshold tiers do not apply to the proposed project.
The SCAQMD is in the process of preparing recommended significance thresholds for greenhouse gases
for local lead agency consideration (“SCAQMD draft local agency threshold”); however, the SCAQMD
Board has not approved the thresholds as of the date of the Notice of Preparation. The current draft
thresholds consist of the following tiered approach:
§ Tier 1 consists of evaluating whether or not the project qualifies for any applicable exemption
under CEQA.
§ Tier 2 consists of determining whether the project is consistent with a greenhouse gas reduction
plan. If a project is consistent with a qualifying local greenhouse gas reduction plan, it does not
have significant greenhouse gas emissions.
§ Tier 3 consists of screening values, which the lead agency can choose, but must be consistent with
all projects within its jurisdiction. A project’s construction emissions are averaged over 30 years
and are added to a project’s operational emissions. If a project’s emissions are under one of the
following screening thresholds, then the project is less than significant:
□ All land use types: 3,000 MTCO2e per year
□ Based on land use type: residential: 3,500 MTCO2e per year; commercial: 1,400 MTCO2e per
year; or mixed use: 3,000 MTCO2e per year.
□ Based on land type: Industrial (where SCAQMD is the lead agency), 10,000 MTCO2e per year.
§ Tier 4 has the following options:
□ Option 1: Reduce emissions from business as usual (BAU) by a certain percentage; this
percentage is currently undefined.
□ Option 2: Early implementation of applicable AB 32 Scoping Plan measures.
□ Option 3, 2020 target for service populations (SP), which includes residents and employees:
4.8 MTCO2e/SP/year for projects and 6.6 MTCO2e/SP/year for plans;
□ Option 3, 2035 target: 3.0 MTCO2e/SP/year for projects and 4.1 MTCO2e/SP/year for plans.
§ Tier 5 involves mitigation offsets to achieve target significance threshold.
The SCAQMD’s draft threshold uses the Executive Order S-3-05 goal as the basis for the Tier 3 screening
level. Achieving the Executive Order’s objective would contribute to worldwide efforts to cap carbon
dioxide concentrations at 450 ppm, thus stabilizing global climate. Specifically, the Tier 3 screening level
for stationary sources is based on an emission capture rate of 90 percent for all new or modified projects.
A 90 percent emission capture rate means that 90 percent of total emissions from all new or modified
stationary source projects would be subject to a CEQA analysis, including a negative declaration, a
mitigated negative declaration, or an environmental impact report, which includes analyzing feasible
alternatives and imposing feasible mitigation measures. A GHG significance threshold based on a 90
percent emission capture rate may be more appropriate to address the long-term adverse impacts
associated with global climate change because most projects will be required to implement GHG
reduction measures. Further, a 90 percent emission capture rate sets the emission threshold low enough
Complete Administrative Draft City of Moorpark April 2022
Beltramo Ranch Project III. Global Climate Change Analysis
Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Impact Analysis
43
to capture a substantial fraction of future stationary source projects that will be constructed to
accommodate future statewide population and economic growth, while setting the emission threshold
high enough to exclude small projects that will in aggregate contribute a relatively small fraction of the
cumulative statewide GHG emissions. This assertion is based on the fact that staff estimates that these
GHG emissions would account for slightly less than one percent of future 2050 statewide GHG emissions
target (85 MMTCO2eq/year). In addition, these small projects may be subject to future applicable GHG
control regulations that would further reduce their overall future contribution to the statewide GHG
inventory. Finally, these small sources are already subject to BACT for criteria pollutants and are more
likely to be single-permit facilities, so they are more likely to have few opportunities readily available to
reduce GHG emissions from other parts of their facility.
E. Local – City of Moorpark
The VCAPCD, Ventura County, and the City of Moorpark have not adopted plans or policies related to GHG
emission reductions.
3. SIGNIFICANCE THRESHOLDS
A. Appendix G of State CEQA Guidelines
The CEQA Guidelines recommend that a lead agency consider the following when assessing the
significance of impacts from GHG emissions on the environment:
§ The extent to which the project may increase (or reduce) GHG emissions as compared to the
existing environmental setting;
§ Whether the project emissions exceed a threshold of significance that the lead agency determines
applies to the project;
§ The extent to which the project complies with regulations or requirements adopted to implement
an adopted statewide, regional, or local plan for the reduction or mitigation of GHG emissions18.
B. Thresholds of Significance for this Project
The VCAPCD, Ventura County, and the City of Moorpark have not developed a numerical significance
threshold or adopted plans or policies related to GHG emission reductions. Therefore, as stated
previously, per VCAPCD guidance, the SCAQMD draft GHG emissions threshold of 3,000 MTCO2e/year
was used.
18 The Governor’s Office of Planning and Research recommendations include a requirement that such a plan must be adopted
through a public review process and include specific requirements that reduce or mitigate the project’s incremental
contribution of GHG emissions. If there is substantial evidence that the possible effects of a particular project are still
cumulatively considerable, notwithstanding compliance with the adopted regulations or requirements, an EIR must be
prepared for the project.
Complete Administrative Draft City of Moorpark April 2022
Beltramo Ranch Project III. Global Climate Change Analysis
Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Impact Analysis
44
4. METHODOLOGY
In view of the above considerations, this analysis also quantifies the project’s total annual GHG emissions
for informational purposes, taking into account the GHG emission reduction features that would be
incorporated into the Project’s design.
The proposed project is anticipated to generate GHG emissions from area sources, energy usage, mobile
sources, waste, water, and construction equipment. The following provides the methodology used to
calculate the project-related GHG emissions and the project impacts.
CalEEMod Version 2020.4.0 was used to calculate the GHG emissions from the proposed project. The
CalEEMod Annual Outputs for both the existing uses (being removed) and for the proposed project are
available in Appendix B. Each source of GHG emissions is described in greater detail below.
A. Area Sources
Area sources include emissions from consumer products, landscape equipment and architectural
coatings. No changes were made to the default area source emissions.
B. Energy Usage
Energy usage includes emissions from the generation of electricity and natural gas used on-site. The
energy use calculations provided below represent a worst-case scenario as the project will be required to
provide PV solar panels which would reduce the project’s energy consumption. No changes were made
to the default energy usage parameters.
C. Mobil Sources
Mobile sources include emissions from the additional vehicle miles generated from the proposed project.
The vehicle trips associated with the proposed project have been analyzed by inputting the project-
generated vehicular trips from the Beltramo Ranch Residential Project Traffic and Circulation Study (TIA)
prepared by Associated Transportation Engineers (May 19, 2021) for the proposed project into the
CalEEMod Model. The TIA found that the proposed project will generate a total of 378 net daily trips (444
trips for the proposed use minus 66 trips from the existing church and residential uses being demolished).
See Section II for details.
D. Waste
Waste includes the GHG emissions generated from the processing of waste from the proposed project as
well as the GHG emissions from the waste once it is interred into a landfill. AB 341 requires that 75 percent
of waste be diverted from landfills by 2020, this analysis conservatively assumed that 50 percent of solid
waste would be recycled and the reductions for this are shown in the mitigated CalEEMod output values.
No other changes were made to the default waste parameters.
Complete Administrative Draft City of Moorpark April 2022
Beltramo Ranch Project III. Global Climate Change Analysis
Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Impact Analysis
45
E. Water
Water includes the water used for the interior of the building as well as for landscaping and is based on
the GHG emissions associated with the energy used to transport and filter the water. CalGreen requires a
20 percent reduction in indoor water use and water efficient irrigation systems, this regulation was
incorporated into the analysis. No other changes were made to the default water usage parameters.
F. Construction
The construction-related GHG emissions were also included in the analysis and were based on a 30-year
amortization rate as recommended in the SCAQMD GHG Working Group meeting on November 19, 2009.
The construction-related GHG emissions were calculated by CalEEMod using the methodology detailed
above in Section II, Air Quality Analysis, of this technical report.
5. PROJECT GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS
The GHG emissions have been calculated based on the parameters described above. A summary of the
results is shown in Table 4, Project-Related Greenhouse Gas Emissions. As shown in Table 4, the project’s
total emissions (with incorporation of regulatory requirements (CalGreen and AB 341) and subtraction of
emissions from the existing uses being removed) would be 480.17 MTCO2e per year.
Table 4
Project-Related Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Category
Greenhouse Gas Emissions (Metric Tons/Year)
Bio-CO2 NonBio-CO2 CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Area Sources1 0.00 0.57 0.57 0.00 0.00 0.58
Energy Usage2 0.00 148.60 148.60 0.01 0.00 149.30
Mobile Sources3 0.00 393.81 393.81 0.03 0.02 400.06
Waste4 5.99 0.00 5.99 0.35 0.00 14.85
Water5 0.78 12.87 13.65 0.08 0.00 16.26
Construction6 0.00 22.41 22.41 0.01 0.00 22.66
Sequestration7 -12.21
Subtotal Emissions 6.77 578.08 584.85 0.47 0.02 591.49
-Existing uses being
removed -8.50 -88.92 -97.41 -0.51 0.00 -111.33
Total Emissions -1.73 489.07 487.34 -0.04 0.02 480.17
SCAQMD Draft Threshold 3,000
Exceeds Threshold? No
Complete Administrative Draft City of Moorpark April 2022
Beltramo Ranch Project III. Global Climate Change Analysis
Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Impact Analysis
46
Table 4
Project-Related Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Category
Greenhouse Gas Emissions (Metric Tons/Year)
Bio-CO2 NonBio-CO2 CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Notes:
(1) Area sources consist of GHG emissions from consumer products, architectural coatings, and landscape equipment.
(2) Energy usage consist of GHG emissions from electricity and natural gas usage.
(3) Mobile sources consist of GHG emissions from vehicles
(4) Solid waste includes the CO2 and CH4 emissions created from the solid waste placed in landfills (AB341 applied).
(5) Water includes GHG emissions from electricity used for transport of water and processing of wastewater (CalGreen
standards applied).
(6) Construction GHG emissions CO2e based on a 30-year amortization rate.
(7) CO2 sequestration from the planting of ~345 trees (244.24 MTCO2e/20 years [trees' lifetime])
Source: CalEEMod Version 2020.4.0 for Opening Year 2024 and existing uses (2023).
6. CONSISTENCY WITH APPLICABLE GREENHOUSE GAS REDUCTION PLANS AND
POLICIES
The proposed project would have the potential to conflict with any applicable plan, policy or regulation
of an agency adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases. As stated previously,
the neither the City of Moorpark nor the VCAPCD currently have a Climate Action Plan; therefore, the
project has been compared to the goals of the CARB Scoping Plan.
Scoping Plan
Emission reductions in California alone would not be able to stabilize the concentration of greenhouse
gases in the earth’s atmosphere. However, California’s actions set an example and drive progress towards
a reduction in greenhouse gases elsewhere. If other states and countries were to follow California’s
emission reduction targets, this could avoid medium or higher ranges of global temperature increases.
Thus, severe consequences of climate change could also be avoided.
CARB Board approved a Climate Change Scoping Plan in December 2008. The Scoping Plan outlines the
State’s strategy to achieve the 2020 greenhouse gas emissions limit. The Scoping Plan “proposes a
comprehensive set of actions designed to reduce overall greenhouse gas emissions in California, improve
our environment, reduce our dependence on oil, diversify our energy sources, save energy, create new
jobs, and enhance public health” (California Air Resources Board 2008). The measures in the Scoping Plan
have been in place since 2012.
This Scoping Plan calls for an “ambitious but achievable” reduction in California’s greenhouse gas
emissions, cutting approximately 30 percent from business-as-usual emission levels projected for 2020,
or about 10 percent from today’s levels. On a per-capita basis, that means reducing annual emissions of
Complete Administrative Draft City of Moorpark April 2022
Beltramo Ranch Project III. Global Climate Change Analysis
Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Impact Analysis
47
14 tons of carbon dioxide for every man, woman and child in California down to about 10 tons per person
by 2020.
In May 2014, CARB released its First Update to the Climate Change Scoping Plan (CARB 2014). This Update
identifies the next steps for California’s leadership on climate change. While California continues on its
path to meet the near-term 2020 greenhouse gas limit, it must also set a clear path toward long-term,
deep GHG emission reductions. This report highlights California’s success to date in reducing its GHG
emissions and lays the foundation for establishing a broad framework for continued emission reductions
beyond 2020, on the path to 80 percent below 1990 levels by 2050.
In November 2017, CARB release the 2017 Scoping Plan. This Scoping Plan incorporates, coordinates, and
leverages many existing and ongoing efforts and identifies new policies and actions to accomplish the
State’s climate goals, and includes a description of a suite of specific actions to meet the State’s 2030 GHG
limit. In addition, Chapter 4 provides a broader description of the many actions and proposals being
explored across the sectors, including the natural resources sector, to achieve the State’s mid and long-
term climate goals.
Guided by legislative direction, the actions identified in the 2017 Scoping Plan reduce overall GHG
emissions in California and deliver policy signals that will continue to drive investment and certainty in a
low carbon economy. The 2017 Scoping Plan builds upon the successful framework established by the
Initial Scoping Plan and First Update, while identifying new, technologically feasible, and cost-effective
strategies to ensure that California meets its GHG reduction targets in a way that promotes and rewards
innovation, continues to foster economic growth, and delivers improvements to the environment and
public health, including in disadvantaged communities. The Plan includes policies to require direct GHG
reductions at some of the State’s largest stationary sources and mobile sources. These policies include
the use of lower GHG fuels, efficiency regulations, and the Cap-and Trade Program, which constrains and
reduces emissions at covered sources.
As the latest, 2017 Scoping Plan builds upon previous versions, project consistency with applicable
strategies of both the 2008 and 2017 Plan are assessed in Table 5, Project Consistency with CARG Scoping
Plan Policies and Measures.
Table 5
Project Consistency with CARB Scoping Plan Policies and Measures
2008 Scoping Plan Measures to Reduce Greenhouse
Gas Emissions
Project Compliance with Measure
California Light-Duty Vehicle Greenhouse Gas Standards
– Implement adopted standards and planned second
phase of the program. Align zero-emission vehicle,
alternative and renewable fuel and vehicle technology
programs with long-term climate change goals.
No conflict. These are CARB enforced standards;
vehicles that access the proposed project, that are
required to comply with the standards, will comply
with the strategy.
Complete Administrative Draft City of Moorpark April 2022
Beltramo Ranch Project III. Global Climate Change Analysis
Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Impact Analysis
48
Table 5
Project Consistency with CARB Scoping Plan Policies and Measures
2008 Scoping Plan Measures to Reduce Greenhouse
Gas Emissions
Project Compliance with Measure
Energy Efficiency – Maximize energy efficiency building
and appliance standards; pursue additional efficiency
including new technologies, policy, and implementation
mechanisms. Pursue comparable investment in energy
efficiency from all retail providers of electricity in
California.
No conflict. The proposed project will be compliant
with the current Title 24 standards.
Low Carbon Fuel Standard – Develop and adopt the Low
Carbon Fuel Standard.
No conflict. These are CARB enforced standards;
vehicles that access the proposed project that are
required to comply with the standards will comply
with the strategy.
Vehicle Efficiency Measures – Implement light-duty
vehicle efficiency measures.
No conflict. These are CARB enforced standards;
vehicles that access the proposed project, that are
required to comply with the standards, will comply
with the strategy.
Medium/Heavy-Duty Vehicles – Adopt medium and
heavy-duty vehicle efficiency measures.
No conflict. These are CARB enforced standards;
vehicles that access the proposed project, that are
required to comply with the standards, will comply
with the strategy.
Green Building Strategy – Expand the use of green
building practices to reduce the carbon footprint of
California’s new and existing inventory of buildings.
No conflict. The California Green Building Standards
Code (proposed Part 11, Title 24) was adopted as part
of the California Building Standards Code in the CCR.
Part 11 establishes voluntary standards, that are
mandatory in the 2019 edition of the Code, on
planning and design for sustainable site development,
energy efficiency (in excess of the California Energy
Code requirements), water conservation, material
conservation, and internal air contaminants. The
proposed project will be subject to these mandatory
standards.
High Global Warming Potential Gases – Adopt measures
to reduce high global warming potential gases.
No conflict. CARB identified five measures that reduce
HFC emissions from vehicular and commercial
refrigeration systems; vehicles that access the
proposed project that are required to comply with the
measures will comply with the strategy.
Recycling and Waste – Reduce methane emissions at
landfills. Increase waste diversion, composting, and
commercial recycling. Move toward zero-waste.
No conflict. The state is currently developing a
regulation to reduce methane emissions from
municipal solid waste landfills. The proposed project
will be required to comply with City programs, such as
City’s recycling and waste reduction program, which
comply, with the 75 percent reduction required in
2020 per AB 341.
Complete Administrative Draft City of Moorpark April 2022
Beltramo Ranch Project III. Global Climate Change Analysis
Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Impact Analysis
49
Table 5
Project Consistency with CARB Scoping Plan Policies and Measures
2008 Scoping Plan Measures to Reduce Greenhouse
Gas Emissions
Project Compliance with Measure
Water – Continue efficiency programs and use cleaner
energy sources to move and treat water.
No conflict. The proposed project will comply with all
applicable City ordinances and CAL Green
requirements.
2017 Scoping Plan Recommended Actions to Reduce
Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Project Compliance with Recommended Action
Implement Mobile Source Strategy: Further increase
GHG stringency on all light-duty vehicles beyond existing
Advanced Clean Car regulations.
No conflict. These are CARB enforced standards;
vehicles that access the proposed project, that are
required to comply with the standards, will comply
with the strategy
Implement Mobile Source Strategy: At least 1.5 million
zero emission and plug-in hybrid light-duty electric
vehicles by 2025 and at least 4.2 million zero emission
and plug-in hybrid light-duty electric vehicles by 2030.
No conflict. These are CARB enforced standards;
vehicles that access the proposed project, that are
required to comply with the standards, will comply
with the strategy.
Implement Mobile Source Strategy: Innovative Clean
Transit: Transition to a suite of to-be-determined
innovative clean transit options. Assumed 20 percent of
new urban buses purchased beginning in 2018 will be
zero emission buses with the penetration of zero-
emission technology ramped up to 100 percent of new
sales in 2030. Also, new natural gas buses, starting in
2018, and diesel buses, starting in 2020, meet the
optional heavy-duty low-NOX standard.
No conflict. These are CARB enforced standards;
vehicles that access the proposed project, that are
required to comply with the standards, will comply
with the strategy
Implement Mobile Source Strategy: Last Mile Delivery:
New regulation that would result in the use of low NOX
or cleaner engines and the deployment of increasing
numbers of zero-emission trucks primarily for class 3-7
last mile delivery trucks in California. This measure
assumes ZEVs comprise 2.5 percent of new Class 3–7
truck sales in local fleets starting in 2020, increasing to
10 percent in 2025 and remaining flat through 2030.
No conflict. These are CARB enforced standards;
vehicles that access the proposed project, that are
required to comply with the standards, will comply
with the strategy
Implement SB 350 by 2030: Establish annual targets for
statewide energy efficiency savings and demand
reduction that will achieve a cumulative doubling of
statewide energy efficiency savings in electricity and
natural gas end uses by 2030.
No conflict. The proposed project will be compliant
with the current Title 24 standards.
By 2019, develop regulations and programs to support
organic waste landfill reduction goals in the SLCP and SB
1383.
No conflict. The proposed project will be required to
comply with City programs, such as City’s recycling and
waste reduction program, which comply with the 75
percent reduction required by 2020 per AB 341.
Source: CARB Scoping Plan (2008 and 2017)
Complete Administrative Draft City of Moorpark April 2022
Beltramo Ranch Project III. Global Climate Change Analysis
Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Impact Analysis
50
As shown in Table 5 above, the project is consistent with the applicable strategies and would result in a
less than significant impact. Therefore, the project would not conflict with any applicable plan, policy or
regulation of an agency adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases.
7. CUMULATIVE GREENHOUSE GAS IMPACTS
Although the project is expected to emit GHGs, the emission of GHGs by a single project into the
atmosphere is not itself necessarily an adverse environmental effect. Rather, it is the increased
accumulation of GHG from more than one project and many sources in the atmosphere that may result
in global climate change. Therefore, in the case of global climate change, the proximity of the project to
other GHG emission generating activities is not directly relevant to the determination of a cumulative
impact because climate change is a global condition. According to CAPCOA, “GHG impacts are exclusively
cumulative impacts; there are no non-cumulative GHG emission impacts from a climate change
perspective.”19 The resultant consequences of that climate change can cause adverse environmental
effects. A project’s GHG emissions typically would be very small in comparison to state or global GHG
emissions and, consequently, they would, in isolation, have no significant direct impact on climate change.
The California Governor issued Executive Order S-3-05, GHG Emission, in June 2005, which established
the following reduction targets:
§ 2010: Reduce greenhouse gas emissions to 2000 levels
§ 2020: Reduce greenhouse gas emissions to 1990 levels
§ 2050: Reduce greenhouse gas emissions to 80 percent below 1990 levels.
In 2006, the California State Legislature adopted AB 32, the California Global Warming Solutions Act of
2006. AB 32 requires CARB, to adopt rules and regulations to achieve GHG emissions equivalent to
statewide levels in 1990 by 2020 through an enforceable statewide emission cap which was phased in
starting in 2012.
Therefore, as the project's emissions meet the threshold for compliance with Executive Order S-3-05, the
project's emissions also comply with the goals of AB 32 and the Scoping Plan. Additionally, as the project
meets the current interim emissions targets/thresholds established by SCAQMD, the project would also
be on track to meet the reduction target of 40 percent below 1990 levels by 2030 mandated by SB-32.
Furthermore, the majority of the post 2020 reductions in GHG emissions are addressed via regulatory
19 Source: California Air Pollution Control Officers Association, CEQA & Climate change: Evaluating and Addressing Greenhouse
Gas Emissions from Projects Subject to the California Environmental Quality Act, (2008).
Complete Administrative Draft City of Moorpark April 2022
Beltramo Ranch Project III. Global Climate Change Analysis
Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Impact Analysis
51
requirements at the State level and the project will be required to comply with these regulations as they
come into effect.
As discussed previously, the project would emit less than 3,000 MTCO2e/year and would not conflict with
the CARB Scoping Plan. Therefore, the project’s incremental contribution to greenhouse gas emissions
and their effects on climate change would not be cumulatively considerable.
Beltramo Ranch Project VI. List of Acronyms and Abbreviations
Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Impact Analysis
55
VI. LIST OF ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS
AQMP Air Quality Management Plan
BACT Best Available Control Technologies
CAAQS California Ambient Air Quality Standards
CalEPA California Environmental Protection Agency
CARB California Air Resources Board
CCAA California Clean Air Act
CCAR California Climate Action Registry
CEQA California Environmental Quality Act
CFCs Chlorofluorocarbons
CH4 Methane
CNG Compressed natural gas
CO Carbon monoxide
CO2 Carbon dioxide
CO2e Carbon dioxide equivalent
DPM Diesel particulate matter
EPA U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
GHG Greenhouse gas
GWP Global warming potential
HIDPM Hazard Index Diesel Particulate Matter
HFCs Hydrofluorocarbons
IPCC International Panel on Climate Change
LCFS Low Carbon Fuel Standard
MTCO2e Metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalent
MMTCO2e Million metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalent
MPO Metropolitan Planning Organization
NAAQS National Ambient Air Quality Standards
NOx Nitrogen Oxides
NO2 Nitrogen dioxide
N2O Nitrous oxide
O3 Ozone
OPR Governor’s Office of Planning and Research
PFCs Perfluorocarbons
PM Particle matter
PM10 Particles that are less than 10 micrometers in diameter
PM2.5 Particles that are less than 2.5 micrometers in diameter
PMI Point of maximum impact
Complete Administrative Draft City of Moorpark April 2022
Beltramo Ranch Project VII. List of Acronyms and Abbreviations
Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Impact Analysis
56
PPM Parts per million
PPB Parts per billion
ROG Reactive Organic Gases (aka ROC or VOC)
RTIP Regional Transportation Improvement Plan
RTP Regional Transportation Plan
SCAB South Coast Air Basin
SCAG Southern California Association of Governments
SCAQMD South Coast Air Quality Management District
SF6 Sulfur hexafluoride
SIP State Implementation Plan
SOx Sulfur Oxides
TAC Toxic air contaminants
VCAPCD Ventura County Air Pollution Control District
VOC Volatile organic compounds
Beltramo Ranch Project V. References
Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Impact Analysis
53
V. REFERENCES
Associated Transportation Engineers
2021 Traffic and Circulation Study For the Beltramo Ranch Residential Project, City of Moorpark. May
19.
California Air Resources Board
2008 Resolution 08-43
2008 Recommended Approaches for Setting Interim Significance Thresholds for Greenhouse Gases
under the California Environmental Quality Act
2008 Climate Change Scoping Plan, a framework for change.
2011 Supplement to the AB 32 Scoping Plan Functional Equivalent Document
2013 Almanac of Emissions and Air Quality.
Source: https://www.arb.ca.gov/aqd/almanac/almanac13/almanac13.htm
2014 First Update to the Climate Change Scoping Plan, Building on the Framework Pursuant to AB32,
the California Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006. May.
2017 California's 2017 Climate Change Scoping Plan. November.
City of Moorpark
1986 General Plan
Governor’s Office of Planning and Research
2008 CEQA and Climate: Addressing Climate Change Through California Environmental Quality Act
(CEQA) Review
2018 CEQA Guideline Sections to be Added or Amended
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC).
2014 IPCC Fifth Assessment Report, Climate Change 2014: Synthesis Report
South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD)
2011 California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) And Federal Conformity Guidelines. February
Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment
2015 Air Toxics Hot Spots Program Risk Assessment Guidelines
Southern California Association of Governments
2016 2016-2040 Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy
Complete Administrative Draft City of Moorpark April 2022
Beltramo Ranch Project V. References
Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Impact Analysis
54
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
2017 Understanding Global Warming Potentials
(Source: https://www.epa.gov/ghgemissions/understanding-global-warming-potentials)
U.S. Geological Survey
2011 Reported Historic Asbestos Mines, Historic Asbestos Prospects, and Other Natural Occurrences of
Asbestos in California
Beltramo Ranch Project VI. List of Acronyms and Abbreviations
Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Impact Analysis
55
VI. LIST OF ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS
AQMP Air Quality Management Plan
BACT Best Available Control Technologies
CAAQS California Ambient Air Quality Standards
CalEPA California Environmental Protection Agency
CARB California Air Resources Board
CCAA California Clean Air Act
CCAR California Climate Action Registry
CEQA California Environmental Quality Act
CFCs Chlorofluorocarbons
CH4 Methane
CNG Compressed natural gas
CO Carbon monoxide
CO2 Carbon dioxide
CO2e Carbon dioxide equivalent
DPM Diesel particulate matter
EPA U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
GHG Greenhouse gas
GWP Global warming potential
HIDPM Hazard Index Diesel Particulate Matter
HFCs Hydrofluorocarbons
IPCC International Panel on Climate Change
LCFS Low Carbon Fuel Standard
MTCO2e Metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalent
MMTCO2e Million metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalent
MPO Metropolitan Planning Organization
NAAQS National Ambient Air Quality Standards
NOx Nitrogen Oxides
NO2 Nitrogen dioxide
N2O Nitrous oxide
O3 Ozone
OPR Governor’s Office of Planning and Research
PFCs Perfluorocarbons
PM Particle matter
PM10 Particles that are less than 10 micrometers in diameter
PM2.5 Particles that are less than 2.5 micrometers in diameter
PMI Point of maximum impact
Complete Administrative Draft City of Moorpark April 2022
Beltramo Ranch Project VII. List of Acronyms and Abbreviations
Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Impact Analysis
56
PPM Parts per million
PPB Parts per billion
ROG Reactive Organic Gases (aka ROC or VOC)
RTIP Regional Transportation Improvement Plan
RTP Regional Transportation Plan
SCAB South Coast Air Basin
SCAG Southern California Association of Governments
SCAQMD South Coast Air Quality Management District
SF6 Sulfur hexafluoride
SIP State Implementation Plan
SOx Sulfur Oxides
TAC Toxic air contaminants
VCAPCD Ventura County Air Pollution Control District
VOC Volatile organic compounds
APPENDICES
Appendix A: CalEEMod Model Daily Emissions Printouts
Appendix B: CalEEMod Annual Emissions Printouts
Appendix C: Emissions Reduction and Dust Control BMP Measures
APPENDIX A
CalEEMod Model Daily Emissions Printouts
Beltramo Ranch
Ventura County, Summer
Project Characteristics -
Land Use - 47 SFDs with ~1.85 ac of on-site roads, ~56,000 SF of open space on ~7.4 acres
Construction Phase - Construction to start ~ Jan 2023 and take ~19 months to complete.
Trips and VMT - 1 vendor trip added to demo for the removal and transport of the triple-wide trailer offsite to 11450 Mission Blvd, Mira Loma (93.8 miles).
Vehicle calss changed to HHDT.
Demolition - 7,402 SF of demo (4,274 SF of existing residences and church, 3,128 SF of mobile homes) = 340.5 tons. 74,225 SF of asphalt and paving = 501
tons. Total tons of demo = 841.5 tons
Grading - ~2553 CY of import.
Architectural Coating - Area of roads to be painted = 6% of 80,586 SF = 4,835 SF
Area Coating - Area of roads to be painted = 6% of 80,586 SF = 4,835 SF
Sequestration - ~345 new trees to be planted on-site
1.1 Land Usage
Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area Population
Other Asphalt Surfaces 1.85 Acre 1.85 80,586.00 0
Other Non-Asphalt Surfaces 56.00 1000sqft 1.29 56,000.00 0
Single Family Housing 47.00 Dwelling Unit 4.26 84,600.00 144
1.2 Other Project Characteristics
Urbanization
Climate Zone
Urban
8
Wind Speed (m/s)Precipitation Freq (Days)2.6 31
1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data
1.0 Project Characteristics
Utility Company Southern California Edison
2024Operational Year
CO2 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
390.98 0.033CH4 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
0.004N2O Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 2/28/2022 8:23 AMPage 1 of 26
Beltramo Ranch - Ventura County, Summer
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
Construction Off-road Equipment Mitigation -
Water Mitigation - 20% reduction in indoor water use per CalGreen requirements.
Waste Mitigation - Assumed least 50% of waste will be diverted.
Woodstoves -
2.0 Emissions Summary
Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value
tblArchitecturalCoating ConstArea_Parking 8,195.00 4,835.00
tblAreaCoating Area_Parking 8195 4835
tblConstDustMitigation WaterUnpavedRoadVehicleSpeed 0 15
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 20.00 30.00
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 20.00 120.00
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 20.00 55.00
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 20.00 55.00
tblGrading MaterialImported 0.00 2,553.00
tblLandUse LotAcreage 15.26 4.26
tblSequestration NumberOfNewTrees 0.00 345.00
tblTripsAndVMT VendorTripLength 7.30 93.80
tblTripsAndVMT VendorTripNumber 0.00 1.00
tblTripsAndVMT VendorVehicleClass HDT_Mix HHDT
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 2/28/2022 8:23 AMPage 2 of 26
Beltramo Ranch - Ventura County, Summer
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission)
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year lb/day lb/day
2023 2.3236 22.3395 20.2324 0.0440 7.2552 1.0047 8.0332 3.4706 0.9349 4.1864 0.0000 4,311.590
0
4,311.590
0
1.0840 0.0950 4,361.222
6
2024 17.3855 14.5800 18.2997 0.0369 0.7906 0.6226 1.4132 0.2138 0.5856 0.7995 0.0000 3,608.699
8
3,608.699
8
0.7356 0.0929 3,652.412
3
Maximum 17.3855 22.3395 20.2324 0.0440 7.2552 1.0047 8.0332 3.4706 0.9349 4.1864 0.0000 4,311.590
0
4,311.590
0
1.0840 0.0950 4,361.222
6
Unmitigated Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year lb/day lb/day
2023 2.3236 22.3395 20.2324 0.0440 3.3581 1.0047 4.1361 1.5867 0.9349 2.3025 0.0000 4,311.590
0
4,311.590
0
1.0840 0.0950 4,361.222
6
2024 17.3855 14.5800 18.2997 0.0369 0.7906 0.6226 1.4132 0.2138 0.5856 0.7995 0.0000 3,608.699
8
3,608.699
8
0.7356 0.0929 3,652.412
3
Maximum 17.3855 22.3395 20.2324 0.0440 3.3581 1.0047 4.1361 1.5867 0.9349 2.3025 0.0000 4,311.590
0
4,311.590
0
1.0840 0.0950 4,361.222
6
Mitigated Construction
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 2/28/2022 8:23 AMPage 3 of 26
Beltramo Ranch - Ventura County, Summer
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent
Reduction
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 48.44 0.00 41.25 51.13 0.00 37.78 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 2/28/2022 8:23 AMPage 4 of 26
Beltramo Ranch - Ventura County, Summer
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
2.2 Overall Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Area 2.2177 0.0447 3.8818 2.1000e-
004
0.0215 0.0215 0.0215 0.0215 0.0000 6.9946 6.9946 6.7300e-
003
0.0000 7.1629
Energy 0.0332 0.2836 0.1207 1.8100e-
003
0.0229 0.0229 0.0229 0.0229 362.0288 362.0288 6.9400e-
003
6.6400e-
003
364.1801
Mobile 1.3096 1.3868 11.4617 0.0243 2.6114 0.0189 2.6303 0.6961 0.0177 0.7138 2,514.040
5
2,514.040
5
0.1600 0.1101 2,550.850
0
Total 3.5605 1.7151 15.4642 0.0263 2.6114 0.0634 2.6747 0.6961 0.0621 0.7582 0.0000 2,883.063
9
2,883.063
9
0.1737 0.1167 2,922.193
0
Unmitigated Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Area 2.2177 0.0447 3.8818 2.1000e-
004
0.0215 0.0215 0.0215 0.0215 0.0000 6.9946 6.9946 6.7300e-
003
0.0000 7.1629
Energy 0.0332 0.2836 0.1207 1.8100e-
003
0.0229 0.0229 0.0229 0.0229 362.0288 362.0288 6.9400e-
003
6.6400e-
003
364.1801
Mobile 1.3096 1.3868 11.4617 0.0243 2.6114 0.0189 2.6303 0.6961 0.0177 0.7138 2,514.040
5
2,514.040
5
0.1600 0.1101 2,550.850
0
Total 3.5605 1.7151 15.4642 0.0263 2.6114 0.0634 2.6747 0.6961 0.0621 0.7582 0.0000 2,883.063
9
2,883.063
9
0.1737 0.1167 2,922.193
0
Mitigated Operational
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 2/28/2022 8:23 AMPage 5 of 26
Beltramo Ranch - Ventura County, Summer
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
3.0 Construction Detail
Construction Phase
Phase
Number
Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Num Days
Week
Num Days Phase Description
1 Demolition Demolition 1/2/2023 2/10/2023 5 30
2 Grading Grading 2/11/2023 7/28/2023 5 120
3 Building Construction Building Construction 7/29/2023 6/14/2024 5 230
4 Paving Paving 6/15/2024 8/30/2024 5 55
5 Architectural Coating Architectural Coating 6/15/2024 8/30/2024 5 55
OffRoad Equipment
Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours Horse Power Load Factor
Demolition Concrete/Industrial Saws 1 8.00 81 0.73
Demolition Excavators 3 8.00 158 0.38
Demolition Rubber Tired Dozers 2 8.00 247 0.40
Grading Excavators 1 8.00 158 0.38
Grading Graders 1 8.00 187 0.41
Grading Rubber Tired Dozers 1 8.00 247 0.40
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent
Reduction
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Residential Indoor: 171,315; Residential Outdoor: 57,105; Non-Residential Indoor: 0; Non-Residential Outdoor: 0; Striped Parking Area: 4,835
(Architectural Coating – sqft)
Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 0
Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 120
Acres of Paving: 3.14
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 2/28/2022 8:23 AMPage 6 of 26
Beltramo Ranch - Ventura County, Summer
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction
Water Exposed Area
Reduce Vehicle Speed on Unpaved Roads
Grading Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3 8.00 97 0.37
Building Construction Cranes 1 7.00 231 0.29
Building Construction Forklifts 3 8.00 89 0.20
Building Construction Generator Sets 1 8.00 84 0.74
Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3 7.00 97 0.37
Building Construction Welders 1 8.00 46 0.45
Paving Pavers 2 8.00 130 0.42
Paving Paving Equipment 2 8.00 132 0.36
Paving Rollers 2 8.00 80 0.38
Architectural Coating Air Compressors 1 6.00 78 0.48
Trips and VMT
Phase Name Offroad Equipment
Count
Worker Trip
Number
Vendor Trip
Number
Hauling Trip
Number
Worker Trip
Length
Vendor Trip
Length
Hauling Trip
Length
Worker Vehicle
Class
Vendor
Vehicle Class
Hauling
Vehicle Class
Demolition 6 15.00 1.00 83.00 10.80 93.80 20.00 LD_Mix HHDT HHDT
Grading 6 15.00 0.00 319.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT
Building Construction 9 74.00 27.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT
Paving 6 15.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT
Architectural Coating 1 15.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 2/28/2022 8:23 AMPage 7 of 26
Beltramo Ranch - Ventura County, Summer
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
3.2 Demolition - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 0.6077 0.0000 0.6077 0.0920 0.0000 0.0920 0.0000 0.0000
Off-Road 2.2691 21.4844 19.6434 0.0388 0.9975 0.9975 0.9280 0.9280 3,746.984
0
3,746.984
0
1.0494 3,773.218
3
Total 2.2691 21.4844 19.6434 0.0388 0.6077 0.9975 1.6053 0.0920 0.9280 1.0200 3,746.984
0
3,746.984
0
1.0494 3,773.218
3
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 5.5800e-
003
0.3320 0.0945 1.5600e-
003
0.0483 2.4400e-
003
0.0507 0.0132 2.3400e-
003
0.0156 173.1643 173.1643 0.0118 0.0276 181.6785
Vendor 5.7800e-
003
0.4964 0.1094 2.5500e-
003
0.0818 4.1000e-
003
0.0859 0.0224 3.9200e-
003
0.0263 283.8394 283.8394 0.0197 0.0452 297.8072
Worker 0.0432 0.0267 0.3851 1.0500e-
003
0.1232 6.7000e-
004
0.1239 0.0327 6.1000e-
004
0.0333 107.6023 107.6023 3.1600e-
003
2.8100e-
003
108.5187
Total 0.0545 0.8551 0.5890 5.1600e-
003
0.2533 7.2100e-
003
0.2605 0.0683 6.8700e-
003
0.0752 564.6060 564.6060 0.0346 0.0756 588.0043
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 2/28/2022 8:23 AMPage 8 of 26
Beltramo Ranch - Ventura County, Summer
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
3.2 Demolition - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 0.2735 0.0000 0.2735 0.0414 0.0000 0.0414 0.0000 0.0000
Off-Road 2.2691 21.4844 19.6434 0.0388 0.9975 0.9975 0.9280 0.9280 0.0000 3,746.984
0
3,746.984
0
1.0494 3,773.218
3
Total 2.2691 21.4844 19.6434 0.0388 0.2735 0.9975 1.2710 0.0414 0.9280 0.9694 0.0000 3,746.984
0
3,746.984
0
1.0494 3,773.218
3
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 5.5800e-
003
0.3320 0.0945 1.5600e-
003
0.0483 2.4400e-
003
0.0507 0.0132 2.3400e-
003
0.0156 173.1643 173.1643 0.0118 0.0276 181.6785
Vendor 5.7800e-
003
0.4964 0.1094 2.5500e-
003
0.0818 4.1000e-
003
0.0859 0.0224 3.9200e-
003
0.0263 283.8394 283.8394 0.0197 0.0452 297.8072
Worker 0.0432 0.0267 0.3851 1.0500e-
003
0.1232 6.7000e-
004
0.1239 0.0327 6.1000e-
004
0.0333 107.6023 107.6023 3.1600e-
003
2.8100e-
003
108.5187
Total 0.0545 0.8551 0.5890 5.1600e-
003
0.2533 7.2100e-
003
0.2605 0.0683 6.8700e-
003
0.0752 564.6060 564.6060 0.0346 0.0756 588.0043
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 2/28/2022 8:23 AMPage 9 of 26
Beltramo Ranch - Ventura County, Summer
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
3.3 Grading - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 7.0856 0.0000 7.0856 3.4252 0.0000 3.4252 0.0000 0.0000
Off-Road 1.7109 17.9359 14.7507 0.0297 0.7749 0.7749 0.7129 0.7129 2,872.691
0
2,872.691
0
0.9291 2,895.918
2
Total 1.7109 17.9359 14.7507 0.0297 7.0856 0.7749 7.8605 3.4252 0.7129 4.1381 2,872.691
0
2,872.691
0
0.9291 2,895.918
2
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 5.3700e-
003
0.3190 0.0908 1.5000e-
003
0.0464 2.3500e-
003
0.0488 0.0127 2.2500e-
003
0.0150 166.3838 166.3838 0.0113 0.0265 174.5646
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Worker 0.0432 0.0267 0.3851 1.0500e-
003
0.1232 6.7000e-
004
0.1239 0.0327 6.1000e-
004
0.0333 107.6023 107.6023 3.1600e-
003
2.8100e-
003
108.5187
Total 0.0485 0.3456 0.4759 2.5500e-
003
0.1696 3.0200e-
003
0.1727 0.0454 2.8600e-
003
0.0483 273.9861 273.9861 0.0145 0.0293 283.0832
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 2/28/2022 8:23 AMPage 10 of 26
Beltramo Ranch - Ventura County, Summer
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
3.3 Grading - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 3.1885 0.0000 3.1885 1.5413 0.0000 1.5413 0.0000 0.0000
Off-Road 1.7109 17.9359 14.7507 0.0297 0.7749 0.7749 0.7129 0.7129 0.0000 2,872.691
0
2,872.691
0
0.9291 2,895.918
2
Total 1.7109 17.9359 14.7507 0.0297 3.1885 0.7749 3.9634 1.5413 0.7129 2.2543 0.0000 2,872.691
0
2,872.691
0
0.9291 2,895.918
2
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 5.3700e-
003
0.3190 0.0908 1.5000e-
003
0.0464 2.3500e-
003
0.0488 0.0127 2.2500e-
003
0.0150 166.3838 166.3838 0.0113 0.0265 174.5646
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Worker 0.0432 0.0267 0.3851 1.0500e-
003
0.1232 6.7000e-
004
0.1239 0.0327 6.1000e-
004
0.0333 107.6023 107.6023 3.1600e-
003
2.8100e-
003
108.5187
Total 0.0485 0.3456 0.4759 2.5500e-
003
0.1696 3.0200e-
003
0.1727 0.0454 2.8600e-
003
0.0483 273.9861 273.9861 0.0145 0.0293 283.0832
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 2/28/2022 8:23 AMPage 11 of 26
Beltramo Ranch - Ventura County, Summer
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
3.4 Building Construction - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.5728 14.3849 16.2440 0.0269 0.6997 0.6997 0.6584 0.6584 2,555.209
9
2,555.209
9
0.6079 2,570.406
1
Total 1.5728 14.3849 16.2440 0.0269 0.6997 0.6997 0.6584 0.6584 2,555.209
9
2,555.209
9
0.6079 2,570.406
1
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor 0.0268 1.0230 0.3634 5.0000e-
003
0.1827 6.0800e-
003
0.1888 0.0526 5.8200e-
003
0.0584 542.5775 542.5775 0.0223 0.0812 567.3284
Worker 0.2129 0.1316 1.9000 5.1900e-
003
0.6079 3.2900e-
003
0.6112 0.1612 3.0300e-
003
0.1643 530.8379 530.8379 0.0156 0.0139 535.3589
Total 0.2397 1.1546 2.2635 0.0102 0.7906 9.3700e-
003
0.8000 0.2138 8.8500e-
003
0.2227 1,073.415
4
1,073.415
4
0.0379 0.0950 1,102.687
2
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 2/28/2022 8:23 AMPage 12 of 26
Beltramo Ranch - Ventura County, Summer
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
3.4 Building Construction - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.5728 14.3849 16.2440 0.0269 0.6997 0.6997 0.6584 0.6584 0.0000 2,555.209
9
2,555.209
9
0.6079 2,570.406
1
Total 1.5728 14.3849 16.2440 0.0269 0.6997 0.6997 0.6584 0.6584 0.0000 2,555.209
9
2,555.209
9
0.6079 2,570.406
1
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor 0.0268 1.0230 0.3634 5.0000e-
003
0.1827 6.0800e-
003
0.1888 0.0526 5.8200e-
003
0.0584 542.5775 542.5775 0.0223 0.0812 567.3284
Worker 0.2129 0.1316 1.9000 5.1900e-
003
0.6079 3.2900e-
003
0.6112 0.1612 3.0300e-
003
0.1643 530.8379 530.8379 0.0156 0.0139 535.3589
Total 0.2397 1.1546 2.2635 0.0102 0.7906 9.3700e-
003
0.8000 0.2138 8.8500e-
003
0.2227 1,073.415
4
1,073.415
4
0.0379 0.0950 1,102.687
2
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 2/28/2022 8:23 AMPage 13 of 26
Beltramo Ranch - Ventura County, Summer
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
3.4 Building Construction - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.4716 13.4438 16.1668 0.0270 0.6133 0.6133 0.5769 0.5769 2,555.698
9
2,555.698
9
0.6044 2,570.807
7
Total 1.4716 13.4438 16.1668 0.0270 0.6133 0.6133 0.5769 0.5769 2,555.698
9
2,555.698
9
0.6044 2,570.807
7
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor 0.0261 1.0181 0.3616 4.9200e-
003
0.1827 6.1000e-
003
0.1888 0.0526 5.8300e-
003
0.0584 534.3843 534.3843 0.0229 0.0799 558.7787
Worker 0.1989 0.1181 1.7712 5.0300e-
003
0.6079 3.1500e-
003
0.6110 0.1612 2.9000e-
003
0.1641 518.6166 518.6166 0.0142 0.0129 522.8260
Total 0.2251 1.1362 2.1329 9.9500e-
003
0.7906 9.2500e-
003
0.7999 0.2138 8.7300e-
003
0.2226 1,053.000
9
1,053.000
9
0.0371 0.0929 1,081.604
7
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 2/28/2022 8:23 AMPage 14 of 26
Beltramo Ranch - Ventura County, Summer
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
3.4 Building Construction - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.4716 13.4438 16.1668 0.0270 0.6133 0.6133 0.5769 0.5769 0.0000 2,555.698
9
2,555.698
9
0.6044 2,570.807
7
Total 1.4716 13.4438 16.1668 0.0270 0.6133 0.6133 0.5769 0.5769 0.0000 2,555.698
9
2,555.698
9
0.6044 2,570.807
7
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor 0.0261 1.0181 0.3616 4.9200e-
003
0.1827 6.1000e-
003
0.1888 0.0526 5.8300e-
003
0.0584 534.3843 534.3843 0.0229 0.0799 558.7787
Worker 0.1989 0.1181 1.7712 5.0300e-
003
0.6079 3.1500e-
003
0.6110 0.1612 2.9000e-
003
0.1641 518.6166 518.6166 0.0142 0.0129 522.8260
Total 0.2251 1.1362 2.1329 9.9500e-
003
0.7906 9.2500e-
003
0.7999 0.2138 8.7300e-
003
0.2226 1,053.000
9
1,053.000
9
0.0371 0.0929 1,081.604
7
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 2/28/2022 8:23 AMPage 15 of 26
Beltramo Ranch - Ventura County, Summer
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
3.5 Paving - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 0.9882 9.5246 14.6258 0.0228 0.4685 0.4685 0.4310 0.4310 2,207.547
2
2,207.547
2
0.7140 2,225.396
3
Paving 0.0881 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Total 1.0763 9.5246 14.6258 0.0228 0.4685 0.4685 0.4310 0.4310 2,207.547
2
2,207.547
2
0.7140 2,225.396
3
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Worker 0.0403 0.0239 0.3590 1.0200e-
003
0.1232 6.4000e-
004
0.1239 0.0327 5.9000e-
004
0.0333 105.1250 105.1250 2.8800e-
003
2.6200e-
003
105.9782
Total 0.0403 0.0239 0.3590 1.0200e-
003
0.1232 6.4000e-
004
0.1239 0.0327 5.9000e-
004
0.0333 105.1250 105.1250 2.8800e-
003
2.6200e-
003
105.9782
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 2/28/2022 8:23 AMPage 16 of 26
Beltramo Ranch - Ventura County, Summer
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
3.5 Paving - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 0.9882 9.5246 14.6258 0.0228 0.4685 0.4685 0.4310 0.4310 0.0000 2,207.547
2
2,207.547
2
0.7140 2,225.396
3
Paving 0.0881 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Total 1.0763 9.5246 14.6258 0.0228 0.4685 0.4685 0.4310 0.4310 0.0000 2,207.547
2
2,207.547
2
0.7140 2,225.396
3
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Worker 0.0403 0.0239 0.3590 1.0200e-
003
0.1232 6.4000e-
004
0.1239 0.0327 5.9000e-
004
0.0333 105.1250 105.1250 2.8800e-
003
2.6200e-
003
105.9782
Total 0.0403 0.0239 0.3590 1.0200e-
003
0.1232 6.4000e-
004
0.1239 0.0327 5.9000e-
004
0.0333 105.1250 105.1250 2.8800e-
003
2.6200e-
003
105.9782
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 2/28/2022 8:23 AMPage 17 of 26
Beltramo Ranch - Ventura County, Summer
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
3.6 Architectural Coating - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Archit. Coating 16.0477 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Off-Road 0.1808 1.2188 1.8101 2.9700e-
003
0.0609 0.0609 0.0609 0.0609 281.4481 281.4481 0.0159 281.8443
Total 16.2285 1.2188 1.8101 2.9700e-
003
0.0609 0.0609 0.0609 0.0609 281.4481 281.4481 0.0159 281.8443
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Worker 0.0403 0.0239 0.3590 1.0200e-
003
0.1232 6.4000e-
004
0.1239 0.0327 5.9000e-
004
0.0333 105.1250 105.1250 2.8800e-
003
2.6200e-
003
105.9782
Total 0.0403 0.0239 0.3590 1.0200e-
003
0.1232 6.4000e-
004
0.1239 0.0327 5.9000e-
004
0.0333 105.1250 105.1250 2.8800e-
003
2.6200e-
003
105.9782
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 2/28/2022 8:23 AMPage 18 of 26
Beltramo Ranch - Ventura County, Summer
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
3.6 Architectural Coating - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Archit. Coating 16.0477 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Off-Road 0.1808 1.2188 1.8101 2.9700e-
003
0.0609 0.0609 0.0609 0.0609 0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0159 281.8443
Total 16.2285 1.2188 1.8101 2.9700e-
003
0.0609 0.0609 0.0609 0.0609 0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0159 281.8443
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Worker 0.0403 0.0239 0.3590 1.0200e-
003
0.1232 6.4000e-
004
0.1239 0.0327 5.9000e-
004
0.0333 105.1250 105.1250 2.8800e-
003
2.6200e-
003
105.9782
Total 0.0403 0.0239 0.3590 1.0200e-
003
0.1232 6.4000e-
004
0.1239 0.0327 5.9000e-
004
0.0333 105.1250 105.1250 2.8800e-
003
2.6200e-
003
105.9782
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 2/28/2022 8:23 AMPage 19 of 26
Beltramo Ranch - Ventura County, Summer
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Mitigated 1.3096 1.3868 11.4617 0.0243 2.6114 0.0189 2.6303 0.6961 0.0177 0.7138 2,514.040
5
2,514.040
5
0.1600 0.1101 2,550.850
0
Unmitigated 1.3096 1.3868 11.4617 0.0243 2.6114 0.0189 2.6303 0.6961 0.0177 0.7138 2,514.040
5
2,514.040
5
0.1600 0.1101 2,550.850
0
4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile
4.2 Trip Summary Information
4.3 Trip Type Information
Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated
Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT Annual VMT
Other Asphalt Surfaces 0.00 0.00 0.00
Other Non-Asphalt Surfaces 0.00 0.00 0.00
Single Family Housing 443.68 448.38 401.85 1,211,264 1,211,264
Total 443.68 448.38 401.85 1,211,264 1,211,264
Miles Trip %Trip Purpose %
Land Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW Primary Diverted Pass-by
Other Asphalt Surfaces 9.50 7.30 7.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0
Other Non-Asphalt Surfaces 9.50 7.30 7.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0
Single Family Housing 10.80 7.30 7.50 32.90 18.00 49.10 86 11 3
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 2/28/2022 8:23 AMPage 20 of 26
Beltramo Ranch - Ventura County, Summer
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
4.4 Fleet Mix
Land Use LDA LDT1 LDT2 MDV LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY SBUS MH
Other Asphalt Surfaces 0.548670 0.058343 0.171689 0.130773 0.027316 0.007545 0.011806 0.006161 0.000681 0.000392 0.029028 0.000637 0.006958
Other Non-Asphalt Surfaces 0.548670 0.058343 0.171689 0.130773 0.027316 0.007545 0.011806 0.006161 0.000681 0.000392 0.029028 0.000637 0.006958
Single Family Housing 0.548670 0.058343 0.171689 0.130773 0.027316 0.007545 0.011806 0.006161 0.000681 0.000392 0.029028 0.000637 0.006958
5.0 Energy Detail
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
NaturalGas
Mitigated
0.0332 0.2836 0.1207 1.8100e-
003
0.0229 0.0229 0.0229 0.0229 362.0288 362.0288 6.9400e-
003
6.6400e-
003
364.1801
NaturalGas
Unmitigated
0.0332 0.2836 0.1207 1.8100e-
003
0.0229 0.0229 0.0229 0.0229 362.0288 362.0288 6.9400e-
003
6.6400e-
003
364.1801
5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy
Historical Energy Use: N
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 2/28/2022 8:23 AMPage 21 of 26
Beltramo Ranch - Ventura County, Summer
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day
Other Asphalt
Surfaces
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Other Non-
Asphalt Surfaces
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Single Family
Housing
3077.24 0.0332 0.2836 0.1207 1.8100e-
003
0.0229 0.0229 0.0229 0.0229 362.0288 362.0288 6.9400e-
003
6.6400e-
003
364.1801
Total 0.0332 0.2836 0.1207 1.8100e-
003
0.0229 0.0229 0.0229 0.0229 362.0288 362.0288 6.9400e-
003
6.6400e-
003
364.1801
Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 2/28/2022 8:23 AMPage 22 of 26
Beltramo Ranch - Ventura County, Summer
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
6.1 Mitigation Measures Area
6.0 Area Detail
5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day
Other Asphalt
Surfaces
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Other Non-
Asphalt Surfaces
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Single Family
Housing
3.07724 0.0332 0.2836 0.1207 1.8100e-
003
0.0229 0.0229 0.0229 0.0229 362.0288 362.0288 6.9400e-
003
6.6400e-
003
364.1801
Total 0.0332 0.2836 0.1207 1.8100e-
003
0.0229 0.0229 0.0229 0.0229 362.0288 362.0288 6.9400e-
003
6.6400e-
003
364.1801
Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 2/28/2022 8:23 AMPage 23 of 26
Beltramo Ranch - Ventura County, Summer
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Mitigated 2.2177 0.0447 3.8818 2.1000e-
004
0.0215 0.0215 0.0215 0.0215 0.0000 6.9946 6.9946 6.7300e-
003
0.0000 7.1629
Unmitigated 2.2177 0.0447 3.8818 2.1000e-
004
0.0215 0.0215 0.0215 0.0215 0.0000 6.9946 6.9946 6.7300e-
003
0.0000 7.1629
6.2 Area by SubCategory
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
SubCategory lb/day lb/day
Architectural
Coating
0.2418 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Consumer
Products
1.8588 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Hearth 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Landscaping 0.1171 0.0447 3.8818 2.1000e-
004
0.0215 0.0215 0.0215 0.0215 6.9946 6.9946 6.7300e-
003
7.1629
Total 2.2177 0.0447 3.8818 2.1000e-
004
0.0215 0.0215 0.0215 0.0215 0.0000 6.9946 6.9946 6.7300e-
003
0.0000 7.1629
Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 2/28/2022 8:23 AMPage 24 of 26
Beltramo Ranch - Ventura County, Summer
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
Apply Water Conservation Strategy
7.1 Mitigation Measures Water
7.0 Water Detail
6.2 Area by SubCategory
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
SubCategory lb/day lb/day
Architectural
Coating
0.2418 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Consumer
Products
1.8588 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Hearth 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Landscaping 0.1171 0.0447 3.8818 2.1000e-
004
0.0215 0.0215 0.0215 0.0215 6.9946 6.9946 6.7300e-
003
7.1629
Total 2.2177 0.0447 3.8818 2.1000e-
004
0.0215 0.0215 0.0215 0.0215 0.0000 6.9946 6.9946 6.7300e-
003
0.0000 7.1629
Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 2/28/2022 8:23 AMPage 25 of 26
Beltramo Ranch - Ventura County, Summer
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
11.0 Vegetation
8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste
Institute Recycling and Composting Services
8.0 Waste Detail
9.0 Operational Offroad
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type
10.0 Stationary Equipment
Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Hours/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type
Boilers
Equipment Type Number Heat Input/Day Heat Input/Year Boiler Rating Fuel Type
User Defined Equipment
Equipment Type Number
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 2/28/2022 8:23 AMPage 26 of 26
Beltramo Ranch - Ventura County, Summer
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
Beltramo Ranch
Ventura County, Winter
Project Characteristics -
Land Use - 47 SFDs with ~1.85 ac of on-site roads, ~56,000 SF of open space on ~7.4 acres
Construction Phase - Construction to start ~ Jan 2023 and take ~19 months to complete.
Trips and VMT - 1 vendor trip added to demo for the removal and transport of the triple-wide trailer offsite to 11450 Mission Blvd, Mira Loma (93.8 miles).
Vehicle calss changed to HHDT.
Demolition - 7,402 SF of demo (4,274 SF of existing residences and church, 3,128 SF of mobile homes) = 340.5 tons. 74,225 SF of asphalt and paving = 501
tons. Total tons of demo = 841.5 tons
Grading - ~2553 CY of import.
Architectural Coating - Area of roads to be painted = 6% of 80,586 SF = 4,835 SF
Area Coating - Area of roads to be painted = 6% of 80,586 SF = 4,835 SF
Sequestration - ~345 new trees to be planted on-site
1.1 Land Usage
Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area Population
Other Asphalt Surfaces 1.85 Acre 1.85 80,586.00 0
Other Non-Asphalt Surfaces 56.00 1000sqft 1.29 56,000.00 0
Single Family Housing 47.00 Dwelling Unit 4.26 84,600.00 144
1.2 Other Project Characteristics
Urbanization
Climate Zone
Urban
8
Wind Speed (m/s)Precipitation Freq (Days)2.6 31
1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data
1.0 Project Characteristics
Utility Company Southern California Edison
2024Operational Year
CO2 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
390.98 0.033CH4 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
0.004N2O Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 2/28/2022 8:25 AMPage 1 of 26
Beltramo Ranch - Ventura County, Winter
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
Construction Off-road Equipment Mitigation -
Water Mitigation - 20% reduction in indoor water use per CalGreen requirements.
Waste Mitigation - Assumed least 50% of waste will be diverted.
Woodstoves -
2.0 Emissions Summary
Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value
tblArchitecturalCoating ConstArea_Parking 8,195.00 4,835.00
tblAreaCoating Area_Parking 8195 4835
tblConstDustMitigation WaterUnpavedRoadVehicleSpeed 0 15
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 20.00 30.00
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 20.00 120.00
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 20.00 55.00
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 20.00 55.00
tblGrading MaterialImported 0.00 2,553.00
tblLandUse LotAcreage 15.26 4.26
tblSequestration NumberOfNewTrees 0.00 345.00
tblTripsAndVMT VendorTripLength 7.30 93.80
tblTripsAndVMT VendorTripNumber 0.00 1.00
tblTripsAndVMT VendorVehicleClass HDT_Mix HHDT
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 2/28/2022 8:25 AMPage 2 of 26
Beltramo Ranch - Ventura County, Winter
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission)
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year lb/day lb/day
2023 2.3266 22.3776 20.2269 0.0440 7.2552 1.0048 8.0332 3.4706 0.9349 4.1864 0.0000 4,307.148
6
4,307.148
6
1.0843 0.0968 4,356.892
0
2024 17.3921 14.6452 18.2820 0.0367 0.7906 0.6226 1.4132 0.2138 0.5857 0.7995 0.0000 3,587.087
7
3,587.087
7
0.7361 0.0945 3,631.312
0
Maximum 17.3921 22.3776 20.2269 0.0440 7.2552 1.0048 8.0332 3.4706 0.9349 4.1864 0.0000 4,307.148
6
4,307.148
6
1.0843 0.0968 4,356.892
0
Unmitigated Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year lb/day lb/day
2023 2.3266 22.3776 20.2269 0.0440 3.3581 1.0048 4.1361 1.5867 0.9349 2.3025 0.0000 4,307.148
6
4,307.148
6
1.0843 0.0968 4,356.892
0
2024 17.3921 14.6452 18.2820 0.0367 0.7906 0.6226 1.4132 0.2138 0.5857 0.7995 0.0000 3,587.087
7
3,587.087
7
0.7361 0.0945 3,631.312
0
Maximum 17.3921 22.3776 20.2269 0.0440 3.3581 1.0048 4.1361 1.5867 0.9349 2.3025 0.0000 4,307.148
6
4,307.148
6
1.0843 0.0968 4,356.892
0
Mitigated Construction
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 2/28/2022 8:25 AMPage 3 of 26
Beltramo Ranch - Ventura County, Winter
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent
Reduction
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 48.44 0.00 41.25 51.13 0.00 37.78 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 2/28/2022 8:25 AMPage 4 of 26
Beltramo Ranch - Ventura County, Winter
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
2.2 Overall Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Area 2.2177 0.0447 3.8818 2.1000e-
004
0.0215 0.0215 0.0215 0.0215 0.0000 6.9946 6.9946 6.7300e-
003
0.0000 7.1629
Energy 0.0332 0.2836 0.1207 1.8100e-
003
0.0229 0.0229 0.0229 0.0229 362.0288 362.0288 6.9400e-
003
6.6400e-
003
364.1801
Mobile 1.2753 1.5318 12.1394 0.0235 2.6114 0.0189 2.6303 0.6961 0.0177 0.7138 2,429.702
0
2,429.702
0
0.1734 0.1179 2,469.167
4
Total 3.5262 1.8601 16.1419 0.0255 2.6114 0.0634 2.6747 0.6961 0.0621 0.7582 0.0000 2,798.725
3
2,798.725
3
0.1871 0.1245 2,840.510
4
Unmitigated Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Area 2.2177 0.0447 3.8818 2.1000e-
004
0.0215 0.0215 0.0215 0.0215 0.0000 6.9946 6.9946 6.7300e-
003
0.0000 7.1629
Energy 0.0332 0.2836 0.1207 1.8100e-
003
0.0229 0.0229 0.0229 0.0229 362.0288 362.0288 6.9400e-
003
6.6400e-
003
364.1801
Mobile 1.2753 1.5318 12.1394 0.0235 2.6114 0.0189 2.6303 0.6961 0.0177 0.7138 2,429.702
0
2,429.702
0
0.1734 0.1179 2,469.167
4
Total 3.5262 1.8601 16.1419 0.0255 2.6114 0.0634 2.6747 0.6961 0.0621 0.7582 0.0000 2,798.725
3
2,798.725
3
0.1871 0.1245 2,840.510
4
Mitigated Operational
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 2/28/2022 8:25 AMPage 5 of 26
Beltramo Ranch - Ventura County, Winter
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
3.0 Construction Detail
Construction Phase
Phase
Number
Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Num Days
Week
Num Days Phase Description
1 Demolition Demolition 1/2/2023 2/10/2023 5 30
2 Grading Grading 2/11/2023 7/28/2023 5 120
3 Building Construction Building Construction 7/29/2023 6/14/2024 5 230
4 Paving Paving 6/15/2024 8/30/2024 5 55
5 Architectural Coating Architectural Coating 6/15/2024 8/30/2024 5 55
OffRoad Equipment
Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours Horse Power Load Factor
Demolition Concrete/Industrial Saws 1 8.00 81 0.73
Demolition Excavators 3 8.00 158 0.38
Demolition Rubber Tired Dozers 2 8.00 247 0.40
Grading Excavators 1 8.00 158 0.38
Grading Graders 1 8.00 187 0.41
Grading Rubber Tired Dozers 1 8.00 247 0.40
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent
Reduction
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Residential Indoor: 171,315; Residential Outdoor: 57,105; Non-Residential Indoor: 0; Non-Residential Outdoor: 0; Striped Parking Area: 4,835
(Architectural Coating – sqft)
Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 0
Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 120
Acres of Paving: 3.14
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 2/28/2022 8:25 AMPage 6 of 26
Beltramo Ranch - Ventura County, Winter
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction
Water Exposed Area
Reduce Vehicle Speed on Unpaved Roads
Grading Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3 8.00 97 0.37
Building Construction Cranes 1 7.00 231 0.29
Building Construction Forklifts 3 8.00 89 0.20
Building Construction Generator Sets 1 8.00 84 0.74
Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3 7.00 97 0.37
Building Construction Welders 1 8.00 46 0.45
Paving Pavers 2 8.00 130 0.42
Paving Paving Equipment 2 8.00 132 0.36
Paving Rollers 2 8.00 80 0.38
Architectural Coating Air Compressors 1 6.00 78 0.48
Trips and VMT
Phase Name Offroad Equipment
Count
Worker Trip
Number
Vendor Trip
Number
Hauling Trip
Number
Worker Trip
Length
Vendor Trip
Length
Hauling Trip
Length
Worker Vehicle
Class
Vendor
Vehicle Class
Hauling
Vehicle Class
Demolition 6 15.00 1.00 83.00 10.80 93.80 20.00 LD_Mix HHDT HHDT
Grading 6 15.00 0.00 319.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT
Building Construction 9 74.00 27.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT
Paving 6 15.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT
Architectural Coating 1 15.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 2/28/2022 8:25 AMPage 7 of 26
Beltramo Ranch - Ventura County, Winter
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
3.2 Demolition - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 0.6077 0.0000 0.6077 0.0920 0.0000 0.0920 0.0000 0.0000
Off-Road 2.2691 21.4844 19.6434 0.0388 0.9975 0.9975 0.9280 0.9280 3,746.984
0
3,746.984
0
1.0494 3,773.218
3
Total 2.2691 21.4844 19.6434 0.0388 0.6077 0.9975 1.6053 0.0920 0.9280 1.0200 3,746.984
0
3,746.984
0
1.0494 3,773.218
3
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 5.2300e-
003
0.3461 0.0958 1.5600e-
003
0.0483 2.4500e-
003
0.0508 0.0132 2.3400e-
003
0.0156 173.3223 173.3223 0.0118 0.0276 181.8437
Vendor 5.6500e-
003
0.5159 0.1097 2.5600e-
003
0.0818 4.1000e-
003
0.0859 0.0224 3.9200e-
003
0.0263 283.8963 283.8963 0.0197 0.0452 297.8670
Worker 0.0466 0.0312 0.3781 1.0100e-
003
0.1232 6.7000e-
004
0.1239 0.0327 6.1000e-
004
0.0333 102.9460 102.9460 3.4400e-
003
3.1200e-
003
103.9631
Total 0.0575 0.8932 0.5835 5.1300e-
003
0.2533 7.2200e-
003
0.2605 0.0683 6.8700e-
003
0.0752 560.1646 560.1646 0.0349 0.0760 583.6737
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 2/28/2022 8:25 AMPage 8 of 26
Beltramo Ranch - Ventura County, Winter
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
3.2 Demolition - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 0.2735 0.0000 0.2735 0.0414 0.0000 0.0414 0.0000 0.0000
Off-Road 2.2691 21.4844 19.6434 0.0388 0.9975 0.9975 0.9280 0.9280 0.0000 3,746.984
0
3,746.984
0
1.0494 3,773.218
3
Total 2.2691 21.4844 19.6434 0.0388 0.2735 0.9975 1.2710 0.0414 0.9280 0.9694 0.0000 3,746.984
0
3,746.984
0
1.0494 3,773.218
3
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 5.2300e-
003
0.3461 0.0958 1.5600e-
003
0.0483 2.4500e-
003
0.0508 0.0132 2.3400e-
003
0.0156 173.3223 173.3223 0.0118 0.0276 181.8437
Vendor 5.6500e-
003
0.5159 0.1097 2.5600e-
003
0.0818 4.1000e-
003
0.0859 0.0224 3.9200e-
003
0.0263 283.8963 283.8963 0.0197 0.0452 297.8670
Worker 0.0466 0.0312 0.3781 1.0100e-
003
0.1232 6.7000e-
004
0.1239 0.0327 6.1000e-
004
0.0333 102.9460 102.9460 3.4400e-
003
3.1200e-
003
103.9631
Total 0.0575 0.8932 0.5835 5.1300e-
003
0.2533 7.2200e-
003
0.2605 0.0683 6.8700e-
003
0.0752 560.1646 560.1646 0.0349 0.0760 583.6737
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 2/28/2022 8:25 AMPage 9 of 26
Beltramo Ranch - Ventura County, Winter
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
3.3 Grading - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 7.0856 0.0000 7.0856 3.4252 0.0000 3.4252 0.0000 0.0000
Off-Road 1.7109 17.9359 14.7507 0.0297 0.7749 0.7749 0.7129 0.7129 2,872.691
0
2,872.691
0
0.9291 2,895.918
2
Total 1.7109 17.9359 14.7507 0.0297 7.0856 0.7749 7.8605 3.4252 0.7129 4.1381 2,872.691
0
2,872.691
0
0.9291 2,895.918
2
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 5.0300e-
003
0.3325 0.0920 1.5000e-
003
0.0464 2.3500e-
003
0.0488 0.0127 2.2500e-
003
0.0150 166.5356 166.5356 0.0113 0.0265 174.7233
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Worker 0.0466 0.0312 0.3781 1.0100e-
003
0.1232 6.7000e-
004
0.1239 0.0327 6.1000e-
004
0.0333 102.9460 102.9460 3.4400e-
003
3.1200e-
003
103.9631
Total 0.0516 0.3638 0.4701 2.5100e-
003
0.1696 3.0200e-
003
0.1727 0.0454 2.8600e-
003
0.0483 269.4816 269.4816 0.0148 0.0297 278.6864
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 2/28/2022 8:25 AMPage 10 of 26
Beltramo Ranch - Ventura County, Winter
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
3.3 Grading - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 3.1885 0.0000 3.1885 1.5413 0.0000 1.5413 0.0000 0.0000
Off-Road 1.7109 17.9359 14.7507 0.0297 0.7749 0.7749 0.7129 0.7129 0.0000 2,872.691
0
2,872.691
0
0.9291 2,895.918
2
Total 1.7109 17.9359 14.7507 0.0297 3.1885 0.7749 3.9634 1.5413 0.7129 2.2543 0.0000 2,872.691
0
2,872.691
0
0.9291 2,895.918
2
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 5.0300e-
003
0.3325 0.0920 1.5000e-
003
0.0464 2.3500e-
003
0.0488 0.0127 2.2500e-
003
0.0150 166.5356 166.5356 0.0113 0.0265 174.7233
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Worker 0.0466 0.0312 0.3781 1.0100e-
003
0.1232 6.7000e-
004
0.1239 0.0327 6.1000e-
004
0.0333 102.9460 102.9460 3.4400e-
003
3.1200e-
003
103.9631
Total 0.0516 0.3638 0.4701 2.5100e-
003
0.1696 3.0200e-
003
0.1727 0.0454 2.8600e-
003
0.0483 269.4816 269.4816 0.0148 0.0297 278.6864
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 2/28/2022 8:25 AMPage 11 of 26
Beltramo Ranch - Ventura County, Winter
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
3.4 Building Construction - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.5728 14.3849 16.2440 0.0269 0.6997 0.6997 0.6584 0.6584 2,555.209
9
2,555.209
9
0.6079 2,570.406
1
Total 1.5728 14.3849 16.2440 0.0269 0.6997 0.6997 0.6584 0.6584 2,555.209
9
2,555.209
9
0.6079 2,570.406
1
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor 0.0258 1.0680 0.3751 5.0100e-
003
0.1827 6.1200e-
003
0.1888 0.0526 5.8500e-
003
0.0584 543.3544 543.3544 0.0222 0.0814 568.1565
Worker 0.2299 0.1541 1.8651 4.9600e-
003
0.6079 3.2900e-
003
0.6112 0.1612 3.0300e-
003
0.1643 507.8670 507.8670 0.0170 0.0154 512.8844
Total 0.2557 1.2221 2.2402 9.9700e-
003
0.7906 9.4100e-
003
0.8000 0.2138 8.8800e-
003
0.2227 1,051.221
4
1,051.221
4
0.0392 0.0968 1,081.040
8
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 2/28/2022 8:25 AMPage 12 of 26
Beltramo Ranch - Ventura County, Winter
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
3.4 Building Construction - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.5728 14.3849 16.2440 0.0269 0.6997 0.6997 0.6584 0.6584 0.0000 2,555.209
9
2,555.209
9
0.6079 2,570.406
1
Total 1.5728 14.3849 16.2440 0.0269 0.6997 0.6997 0.6584 0.6584 0.0000 2,555.209
9
2,555.209
9
0.6079 2,570.406
1
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor 0.0258 1.0680 0.3751 5.0100e-
003
0.1827 6.1200e-
003
0.1888 0.0526 5.8500e-
003
0.0584 543.3544 543.3544 0.0222 0.0814 568.1565
Worker 0.2299 0.1541 1.8651 4.9600e-
003
0.6079 3.2900e-
003
0.6112 0.1612 3.0300e-
003
0.1643 507.8670 507.8670 0.0170 0.0154 512.8844
Total 0.2557 1.2221 2.2402 9.9700e-
003
0.7906 9.4100e-
003
0.8000 0.2138 8.8800e-
003
0.2227 1,051.221
4
1,051.221
4
0.0392 0.0968 1,081.040
8
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 2/28/2022 8:25 AMPage 13 of 26
Beltramo Ranch - Ventura County, Winter
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
3.4 Building Construction - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.4716 13.4438 16.1668 0.0270 0.6133 0.6133 0.5769 0.5769 2,555.698
9
2,555.698
9
0.6044 2,570.807
7
Total 1.4716 13.4438 16.1668 0.0270 0.6133 0.6133 0.5769 0.5769 2,555.698
9
2,555.698
9
0.6044 2,570.807
7
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor 0.0251 1.0632 0.3731 4.9300e-
003
0.1827 6.1300e-
003
0.1888 0.0526 5.8700e-
003
0.0585 535.1748 535.1748 0.0228 0.0801 559.6195
Worker 0.2152 0.1383 1.7421 4.8100e-
003
0.6079 3.1500e-
003
0.6110 0.1612 2.9000e-
003
0.1641 496.2140 496.2140 0.0155 0.0144 500.8849
Total 0.2403 1.2015 2.1152 9.7400e-
003
0.7906 9.2800e-
003
0.7999 0.2138 8.7700e-
003
0.2226 1,031.388
8
1,031.388
8
0.0383 0.0945 1,060.504
3
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 2/28/2022 8:25 AMPage 14 of 26
Beltramo Ranch - Ventura County, Winter
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
3.4 Building Construction - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.4716 13.4438 16.1668 0.0270 0.6133 0.6133 0.5769 0.5769 0.0000 2,555.698
9
2,555.698
9
0.6044 2,570.807
7
Total 1.4716 13.4438 16.1668 0.0270 0.6133 0.6133 0.5769 0.5769 0.0000 2,555.698
9
2,555.698
9
0.6044 2,570.807
7
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor 0.0251 1.0632 0.3731 4.9300e-
003
0.1827 6.1300e-
003
0.1888 0.0526 5.8700e-
003
0.0585 535.1748 535.1748 0.0228 0.0801 559.6195
Worker 0.2152 0.1383 1.7421 4.8100e-
003
0.6079 3.1500e-
003
0.6110 0.1612 2.9000e-
003
0.1641 496.2140 496.2140 0.0155 0.0144 500.8849
Total 0.2403 1.2015 2.1152 9.7400e-
003
0.7906 9.2800e-
003
0.7999 0.2138 8.7700e-
003
0.2226 1,031.388
8
1,031.388
8
0.0383 0.0945 1,060.504
3
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 2/28/2022 8:25 AMPage 15 of 26
Beltramo Ranch - Ventura County, Winter
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
3.5 Paving - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 0.9882 9.5246 14.6258 0.0228 0.4685 0.4685 0.4310 0.4310 2,207.547
2
2,207.547
2
0.7140 2,225.396
3
Paving 0.0881 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Total 1.0763 9.5246 14.6258 0.0228 0.4685 0.4685 0.4310 0.4310 2,207.547
2
2,207.547
2
0.7140 2,225.396
3
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Worker 0.0436 0.0280 0.3531 9.8000e-
004
0.1232 6.4000e-
004
0.1239 0.0327 5.9000e-
004
0.0333 100.5839 100.5839 3.1400e-
003
2.9100e-
003
101.5307
Total 0.0436 0.0280 0.3531 9.8000e-
004
0.1232 6.4000e-
004
0.1239 0.0327 5.9000e-
004
0.0333 100.5839 100.5839 3.1400e-
003
2.9100e-
003
101.5307
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 2/28/2022 8:25 AMPage 16 of 26
Beltramo Ranch - Ventura County, Winter
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
3.5 Paving - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 0.9882 9.5246 14.6258 0.0228 0.4685 0.4685 0.4310 0.4310 0.0000 2,207.547
2
2,207.547
2
0.7140 2,225.396
3
Paving 0.0881 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Total 1.0763 9.5246 14.6258 0.0228 0.4685 0.4685 0.4310 0.4310 0.0000 2,207.547
2
2,207.547
2
0.7140 2,225.396
3
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Worker 0.0436 0.0280 0.3531 9.8000e-
004
0.1232 6.4000e-
004
0.1239 0.0327 5.9000e-
004
0.0333 100.5839 100.5839 3.1400e-
003
2.9100e-
003
101.5307
Total 0.0436 0.0280 0.3531 9.8000e-
004
0.1232 6.4000e-
004
0.1239 0.0327 5.9000e-
004
0.0333 100.5839 100.5839 3.1400e-
003
2.9100e-
003
101.5307
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 2/28/2022 8:25 AMPage 17 of 26
Beltramo Ranch - Ventura County, Winter
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
3.6 Architectural Coating - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Archit. Coating 16.0477 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Off-Road 0.1808 1.2188 1.8101 2.9700e-
003
0.0609 0.0609 0.0609 0.0609 281.4481 281.4481 0.0159 281.8443
Total 16.2285 1.2188 1.8101 2.9700e-
003
0.0609 0.0609 0.0609 0.0609 281.4481 281.4481 0.0159 281.8443
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Worker 0.0436 0.0280 0.3531 9.8000e-
004
0.1232 6.4000e-
004
0.1239 0.0327 5.9000e-
004
0.0333 100.5839 100.5839 3.1400e-
003
2.9100e-
003
101.5307
Total 0.0436 0.0280 0.3531 9.8000e-
004
0.1232 6.4000e-
004
0.1239 0.0327 5.9000e-
004
0.0333 100.5839 100.5839 3.1400e-
003
2.9100e-
003
101.5307
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 2/28/2022 8:25 AMPage 18 of 26
Beltramo Ranch - Ventura County, Winter
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
3.6 Architectural Coating - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Archit. Coating 16.0477 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Off-Road 0.1808 1.2188 1.8101 2.9700e-
003
0.0609 0.0609 0.0609 0.0609 0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0159 281.8443
Total 16.2285 1.2188 1.8101 2.9700e-
003
0.0609 0.0609 0.0609 0.0609 0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0159 281.8443
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Worker 0.0436 0.0280 0.3531 9.8000e-
004
0.1232 6.4000e-
004
0.1239 0.0327 5.9000e-
004
0.0333 100.5839 100.5839 3.1400e-
003
2.9100e-
003
101.5307
Total 0.0436 0.0280 0.3531 9.8000e-
004
0.1232 6.4000e-
004
0.1239 0.0327 5.9000e-
004
0.0333 100.5839 100.5839 3.1400e-
003
2.9100e-
003
101.5307
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 2/28/2022 8:25 AMPage 19 of 26
Beltramo Ranch - Ventura County, Winter
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Mitigated 1.2753 1.5318 12.1394 0.0235 2.6114 0.0189 2.6303 0.6961 0.0177 0.7138 2,429.702
0
2,429.702
0
0.1734 0.1179 2,469.167
4
Unmitigated 1.2753 1.5318 12.1394 0.0235 2.6114 0.0189 2.6303 0.6961 0.0177 0.7138 2,429.702
0
2,429.702
0
0.1734 0.1179 2,469.167
4
4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile
4.2 Trip Summary Information
4.3 Trip Type Information
Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated
Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT Annual VMT
Other Asphalt Surfaces 0.00 0.00 0.00
Other Non-Asphalt Surfaces 0.00 0.00 0.00
Single Family Housing 443.68 448.38 401.85 1,211,264 1,211,264
Total 443.68 448.38 401.85 1,211,264 1,211,264
Miles Trip %Trip Purpose %
Land Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW Primary Diverted Pass-by
Other Asphalt Surfaces 9.50 7.30 7.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0
Other Non-Asphalt Surfaces 9.50 7.30 7.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0
Single Family Housing 10.80 7.30 7.50 32.90 18.00 49.10 86 11 3
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 2/28/2022 8:25 AMPage 20 of 26
Beltramo Ranch - Ventura County, Winter
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
4.4 Fleet Mix
Land Use LDA LDT1 LDT2 MDV LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY SBUS MH
Other Asphalt Surfaces 0.548670 0.058343 0.171689 0.130773 0.027316 0.007545 0.011806 0.006161 0.000681 0.000392 0.029028 0.000637 0.006958
Other Non-Asphalt Surfaces 0.548670 0.058343 0.171689 0.130773 0.027316 0.007545 0.011806 0.006161 0.000681 0.000392 0.029028 0.000637 0.006958
Single Family Housing 0.548670 0.058343 0.171689 0.130773 0.027316 0.007545 0.011806 0.006161 0.000681 0.000392 0.029028 0.000637 0.006958
5.0 Energy Detail
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
NaturalGas
Mitigated
0.0332 0.2836 0.1207 1.8100e-
003
0.0229 0.0229 0.0229 0.0229 362.0288 362.0288 6.9400e-
003
6.6400e-
003
364.1801
NaturalGas
Unmitigated
0.0332 0.2836 0.1207 1.8100e-
003
0.0229 0.0229 0.0229 0.0229 362.0288 362.0288 6.9400e-
003
6.6400e-
003
364.1801
5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy
Historical Energy Use: N
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 2/28/2022 8:25 AMPage 21 of 26
Beltramo Ranch - Ventura County, Winter
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day
Other Asphalt
Surfaces
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Other Non-
Asphalt Surfaces
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Single Family
Housing
3077.24 0.0332 0.2836 0.1207 1.8100e-
003
0.0229 0.0229 0.0229 0.0229 362.0288 362.0288 6.9400e-
003
6.6400e-
003
364.1801
Total 0.0332 0.2836 0.1207 1.8100e-
003
0.0229 0.0229 0.0229 0.0229 362.0288 362.0288 6.9400e-
003
6.6400e-
003
364.1801
Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 2/28/2022 8:25 AMPage 22 of 26
Beltramo Ranch - Ventura County, Winter
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
6.1 Mitigation Measures Area
6.0 Area Detail
5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day
Other Asphalt
Surfaces
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Other Non-
Asphalt Surfaces
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Single Family
Housing
3.07724 0.0332 0.2836 0.1207 1.8100e-
003
0.0229 0.0229 0.0229 0.0229 362.0288 362.0288 6.9400e-
003
6.6400e-
003
364.1801
Total 0.0332 0.2836 0.1207 1.8100e-
003
0.0229 0.0229 0.0229 0.0229 362.0288 362.0288 6.9400e-
003
6.6400e-
003
364.1801
Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 2/28/2022 8:25 AMPage 23 of 26
Beltramo Ranch - Ventura County, Winter
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Mitigated 2.2177 0.0447 3.8818 2.1000e-
004
0.0215 0.0215 0.0215 0.0215 0.0000 6.9946 6.9946 6.7300e-
003
0.0000 7.1629
Unmitigated 2.2177 0.0447 3.8818 2.1000e-
004
0.0215 0.0215 0.0215 0.0215 0.0000 6.9946 6.9946 6.7300e-
003
0.0000 7.1629
6.2 Area by SubCategory
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
SubCategory lb/day lb/day
Architectural
Coating
0.2418 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Consumer
Products
1.8588 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Hearth 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Landscaping 0.1171 0.0447 3.8818 2.1000e-
004
0.0215 0.0215 0.0215 0.0215 6.9946 6.9946 6.7300e-
003
7.1629
Total 2.2177 0.0447 3.8818 2.1000e-
004
0.0215 0.0215 0.0215 0.0215 0.0000 6.9946 6.9946 6.7300e-
003
0.0000 7.1629
Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 2/28/2022 8:25 AMPage 24 of 26
Beltramo Ranch - Ventura County, Winter
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
Apply Water Conservation Strategy
7.1 Mitigation Measures Water
7.0 Water Detail
6.2 Area by SubCategory
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
SubCategory lb/day lb/day
Architectural
Coating
0.2418 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Consumer
Products
1.8588 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Hearth 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Landscaping 0.1171 0.0447 3.8818 2.1000e-
004
0.0215 0.0215 0.0215 0.0215 6.9946 6.9946 6.7300e-
003
7.1629
Total 2.2177 0.0447 3.8818 2.1000e-
004
0.0215 0.0215 0.0215 0.0215 0.0000 6.9946 6.9946 6.7300e-
003
0.0000 7.1629
Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 2/28/2022 8:25 AMPage 25 of 26
Beltramo Ranch - Ventura County, Winter
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
11.0 Vegetation
8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste
Institute Recycling and Composting Services
8.0 Waste Detail
9.0 Operational Offroad
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type
10.0 Stationary Equipment
Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Hours/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type
Boilers
Equipment Type Number Heat Input/Day Heat Input/Year Boiler Rating Fuel Type
User Defined Equipment
Equipment Type Number
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 2/28/2022 8:25 AMPage 26 of 26
Beltramo Ranch - Ventura County, Winter
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value2.0 Emissions SummaryN2O Intensity (lb/MWhr)0.0041.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default DataProject Characteristics - OPERATIONAL EMISSIONS ONLYLand Use - 6,820 SF church and 2 SFDsUtility CompanySouthern California EdisonCO2 Intensity (lb/MWhr)531.98CH4 Intensity (lb/MWhr)0.033Precipitation Freq (Days)31Climate Zone8Operational Year20231.2 Other Project CharacteristicsUrbanizationUrbanWind Speed (m/s)2.60Single Family Housing 2.00 Dwelling Unit 0.65 3,600.00 6Place of Worship 6.82 1000sqft 0.16 6,820.00Beltramo Existing Uses OPS ONLYVentura County, Summer1.0 Project Characteristics1.1 Land UsageLand Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area PopulationCalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1Date: 6/16/2021 7:27 PMBeltramo Existing Uses OPS ONLY - Ventura County, SummerEMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1Date: 6/16/2021 7:27 PMBeltramo Existing Uses OPS ONLY - Ventura County, SummerEMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied912.7888 912.7888 0.0634 0.0422 926.93630.0620 0.0410 865.2271Total 0.8089 0.5758 4.4309 8.6000e-003 0.8542 0.0115 0.8657 0.2277 0.0110 0.2387 0.00006.2300e-0030.2339 851.4495 851.44958.2800e-003 0.8542 6.6800e-0030.8609 0.2277Mobile 0.5480 0.5238 4.228161.0407 61.0407 1.1700e-0031.1200e-003 61.40342.9000e-0040.0000 0.3058Energy 5.6000e-0030.0501 0.0371 3.1000e-004 3.8700e-0033.8700e-003 3.8700e-0033.8700e-0039.2000e-0049.2000e-004 0.0000 0.2986 0.29861.0000e-005 9.2000e-0049.2000e-004Area 0.2554 1.9100e-003 0.1657N2O CO2eCategory lb/daylb/dayPM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4Mitigated OperationalROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10Exhaust PM10PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5Exhaust PM2.5912.7888 912.7888 0.0634 0.0422 926.93630.0620 0.0410 865.2271Total 0.8089 0.5758 4.4309 8.6000e-003 0.8542 0.0115 0.8657 0.2277 0.0110 0.2387 0.00006.2300e-0030.2339 851.4495 851.44958.2800e-003 0.8542 6.6800e-0030.8609 0.2277Mobile 0.5480 0.5238 4.228161.0407 61.0407 1.1700e-0031.1200e-003 61.40342.9000e-0040.0000 0.3058Energy 5.6000e-0030.0501 0.0371 3.1000e-004 3.8700e-0033.8700e-003 3.8700e-0033.8700e-0039.2000e-0049.2000e-004 0.0000 0.2986 0.29861.0000e-005 9.2000e-0049.2000e-004Area 0.2554 1.9100e-003 0.1657CH4 N2O CO2eCategory lb/daylb/dayExhaust PM2.5PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2SO2 Fugitive PM10Exhaust PM10PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5ROG NOx CO2.2 Overall OperationalUnmitigated Operational
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1Date: 6/16/2021 7:27 PMBeltramo Existing Uses OPS ONLY - Ventura County, SummerEMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied51,543Total 66.28 59.93 205.54 176,153 176,153Single Family Housing 18.88 19.08 17.10 51,543Annual VMTPlace of Worship 47.40 40.85 188.44 124,610 124,610Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT0.0410 865.22714.2 Trip Summary InformationAverage Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated0.2339 851.4495 851.4495 0.06200.8542 6.6800e-0030.8609 0.2277 6.2300e-003Unmitigated 0.5480 0.5238 4.2281 8.2800e-003851.4495 851.4495 0.0620 0.0410 865.2271CO2eCategory lb/daylb/dayMitigated 0.5480 0.5238 4.2281 8.2800e-003 0.8542 6.6800e-0030.8609 0.2277 6.2300e-0030.2339Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2OExhaust PM10PM10 Total Fugitive PM2 5Exhaust PM2 5PM2.5 Total4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile4.1 Mitigation Measures MobileROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM100.00 0.00 0.00N20 CO2ePercent Reduction0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00PM2.5 TotalBio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4Fugitive PM10Exhaust PM10PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5Exhaust PM2.5ROG NOx CO SO2
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1Date: 6/16/2021 7:27 PMBeltramo Existing Uses OPS ONLY - Ventura County, SummerEMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied61.0407 61.0407 1.1700e-0031.1200e-003 61.40341.1700e-0031.1200e-003 61.4034NaturalGas Unmitigated5.6000e-0030.0501 0.0371 3.1000e-004 3.8700e-0033.8700e-003 3.8700e-0033.8700e-0033.8700e-0033.8700e-003 61.0407 61.04073.1000e-004 3.8700e-0033.8700e-003NaturalGas Mitigated5.6000e-0030.0501 0.0371CH4 N2O CO2eCategory lb/daylb/dayExhaust PM2.5PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2SO2 Fugitive PM10Exhaust PM10PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5ROG NOx CO0.000646 0.00735.0 Energy DetailHistorical Energy Use: N5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy0.000393 0.029232 0.000646 0.0073Single Family Housing 0.543528 0.058189 0.173108 0.133952 0.027894 0.007577 0.011427 0.006062 0.000688 0.000393 0.0292320.027894 0.007577 0.011427 0.006062 0.000688Place of Worship 0.543528 0.058189 0.173108 0.133952OBUS UBUS MCY SBUS MHMDV LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD4.4 Fleet MixLand Use LDA LDT1 LDT218.00 49.10 86 11 3Single Family Housing 10.80 7.30 7.50 32.9095.00 5.00 64 25 11Place of Worship 9.50 7.30 7.30 0.00H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW Primary Diverted Pass-byLand Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW H-W or C-W4.3 Trip Type InformationMiles Trip % Trip Purpose %
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1Date: 6/16/2021 7:27 PMBeltramo Existing Uses OPS ONLY - Ventura County, SummerEMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied61.0407 61.0407 1.1700e-003 1.1200e-00361.40342.8000e-00415.4970Total 5.5900e-003 0.0501 0.0371 3.1000e-0043.8700e-003 3.8700e-003 3.8700e-0033.8700e-0039.8000e-004 15.4055 15.4055 3.0000e-00445.6352 8.7000e-004 8.4000e-00445.9064Single Family Housing0.130947 1.4100e-003 0.0121 5.1400e-003 8.0000e-0059.8000e-004 9.8000e-004 9.8000e-0042.8900e-0032.8900e-003 45.63520.0319 2.3000e-0042.8900e-003 2.8900e-003Place of Worship 0.387899 4.1800e-003 0.0380CH4 N2O CO2eLand Use kBTU/yr lb/daylb/dayExhaust PM2.5PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2MitigatedNaturalGas UseROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10Exhaust PM10PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.561.0407 61.0407 1.1700e-003 1.1200e-00361.40342.8000e-00415.4970Total 5.5900e-003 0.0501 0.0371 3.1000e-0043.8700e-003 3.8700e-003 3.8700e-0033.8700e-0039.8000e-004 15.4055 15.4055 3.0000e-00445.6352 8.7000e-004 8.4000e-00445.9064Single Family Housing130.947 1.4100e-003 0.0121 5.1400e-003 8.0000e-0059.8000e-004 9.8000e-004 9.8000e-0042.8900e-0032.8900e-003 45.63520.0319 2.3000e-0042.8900e-003 2.8900e-003Place of Worship 387.899 4.1800e-003 0.0380CH4 N2O CO2eLand Use kBTU/yr lb/daylb/dayExhaust PM2.5PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO25.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGasUnmitigatedNaturalGas UseROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10Exhaust PM10PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1Date: 6/16/2021 7:27 PMBeltramo Existing Uses OPS ONLY - Ventura County, SummerEMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied2.9000e-0040.0000 0.30580.3058Unmitigated 0.2554 1.9100e-003 0.1657 1.0000e-005 9.2000e-0049.2000e-004 9.2000e-0049.2000e-004 0.0000 0.2986 0.29860.0000 0.2986 0.2986 2.9000e-0040.0000CO2eCategory lb/daylb/dayMitigated 0.2554 1.9100e-003 0.1657 1.0000e-005 9.2000e-0049.2000e-004 9.2000e-0049.2000e-004Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2OExhaust PM10PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5Exhaust PM2.5PM2.5 Total6.0 Area Detail6.1 Mitigation Measures AreaROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1Date: 6/16/2021 7:27 PMBeltramo Existing Uses OPS ONLY - Ventura County, SummerEMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied2.9000e-0040.0000 0.30589.2000e-0049.2000e-004 0.0000 0.2986 0.29861.0000e-005 9.2000e-0049.2000e-004Total 0.2554 1.9100e-003 0.16570.2986 0.2986 2.9000e-0040.30580.0000 0.0000 0.0000Landscaping 5.0400e-0031.9100e-003 0.1657 1.0000e-005 9.2000e-0049.2000e-004 9.2000e-0049.2000e-0040.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hearth 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.00000.0000Consumer Products0.2230 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000Architectural Coating0.0274CH4 N2O CO2eSubCategory lb/daylb/dayExhaust PM2.5PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2SO2 Fugitive PM10Exhaust PM10PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5ROG NOx CO6.2 Area by SubCategoryUnmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1Date: 6/16/2021 7:27 PMBeltramo Existing Uses OPS ONLY - Ventura County, SummerEMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied8.0 Waste Detail8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste2.9000e-0040.0000 0.30587.0 Water Detail7.1 Mitigation Measures Water9.2000e-0049.2000e-004 0.0000 0.2986 0.29861.0000e-005 9.2000e-0049.2000e-004Total 0.2554 1.9100e-003 0.16570.2986 0.2986 2.9000e-0040.30580.0000 0.0000 0.0000Landscaping 5.0400e-0031.9100e-003 0.1657 1.0000e-005 9.2000e-0049.2000e-004 9.2000e-0049.2000e-0040.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hearth 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.00000.0000Consumer Products0.2230 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000Architectural Coating0.0274CH4 N2O CO2eSubCategory lb/daylb/dayExhaust PM2.5PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2SO2 Fugitive PM10Exhaust PM10PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5ROG NOx COMitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1Date: 6/16/2021 7:27 PMBeltramo Existing Uses OPS ONLY - Ventura County, SummerEMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule AppliedFuel TypeUser Defined EquipmentEquipment Type Number11.0 VegetationEquipment Type Number Heat Input/Day Heat Input/Year Boiler RatingHours/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel TypeBoilers10.0 Stationary EquipmentFire Pumps and Emergency GeneratorsEquipment Type Number Hours/DayHours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type9.0 Operational OffroadEquipment Type Number
Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value2.0 Emissions SummaryN2O Intensity (lb/MWhr)0.0041.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default DataProject Characteristics - OPERATIONAL EMISSIONS ONLYLand Use - 6,820 SF church and 2 SFDsUtility CompanySouthern California EdisonCO2 Intensity (lb/MWhr)531.98CH4 Intensity (lb/MWhr)0.033Precipitation Freq (Days)31Climate Zone8Operational Year20231.2 Other Project CharacteristicsUrbanizationUrbanWind Speed (m/s)2.60Single Family Housing 2.00 Dwelling Unit 0.65 3,600.00 6Place of Worship 6.82 1000sqft 0.16 6,820.00Beltramo Existing Uses OPS ONLYVentura County, Winter1.0 Project Characteristics1.1 Land UsageLand Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area PopulationCalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1Date: 6/16/2021 7:28 PMBeltramo Existing Uses OPS ONLY - Ventura County, WinterEMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1Date: 6/16/2021 7:28 PMBeltramo Existing Uses OPS ONLY - Ventura County, WinterEMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied884.6861 884.6861 0.0698 0.0453 899.91430.0683 0.0441 838.2050Total 0.7894 0.6321 4.7531 8.3300e-003 0.8542 0.0115 0.8657 0.2277 0.0110 0.2387 0.00006.2300e-0030.2340 823.3468 823.34688.0100e-003 0.8542 6.6800e-0030.8609 0.2277Mobile 0.5284 0.5801 4.550361.0407 61.0407 1.1700e-0031.1200e-003 61.40342.9000e-0040.0000 0.3058Energy 5.6000e-0030.0501 0.0371 3.1000e-004 3.8700e-0033.8700e-003 3.8700e-0033.8700e-0039.2000e-0049.2000e-004 0.0000 0.2986 0.29861.0000e-005 9.2000e-0049.2000e-004Area 0.2554 1.9100e-003 0.1657N2O CO2eCategory lb/daylb/dayPM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4Mitigated OperationalROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10Exhaust PM10PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5Exhaust PM2.5884.6861 884.6861 0.0698 0.0453 899.91430.0683 0.0441 838.2050Total 0.7894 0.6321 4.7531 8.3300e-003 0.8542 0.0115 0.8657 0.2277 0.0110 0.2387 0.00006.2300e-0030.2340 823.3468 823.34688.0100e-003 0.8542 6.6800e-0030.8609 0.2277Mobile 0.5284 0.5801 4.550361.0407 61.0407 1.1700e-0031.1200e-003 61.40342.9000e-0040.0000 0.3058Energy 5.6000e-0030.0501 0.0371 3.1000e-004 3.8700e-0033.8700e-003 3.8700e-0033.8700e-0039.2000e-0049.2000e-004 0.0000 0.2986 0.29861.0000e-005 9.2000e-0049.2000e-004Area 0.2554 1.9100e-003 0.1657CH4 N2O CO2eCategory lb/daylb/dayExhaust PM2.5PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2SO2 Fugitive PM10Exhaust PM10PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5ROG NOx CO2.2 Overall OperationalUnmitigated Operational
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1Date: 6/16/2021 7:28 PMBeltramo Existing Uses OPS ONLY - Ventura County, WinterEMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied51,543Total 66.28 59.93 205.54 176,153 176,153Single Family Housing 18.88 19.08 17.10 51,543Annual VMTPlace of Worship 47.40 40.85 188.44 124,610 124,610Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT0.0441 838.20504.2 Trip Summary InformationAverage Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated0.2340 823.3468 823.3468 0.06830.8542 6.6800e-0030.8609 0.2277 6.2300e-003Unmitigated 0.5284 0.5801 4.5503 8.0100e-003823.3468 823.3468 0.0683 0.0441 838.2050CO2eCategory lb/daylb/dayMitigated 0.5284 0.5801 4.5503 8.0100e-003 0.8542 6.6800e-0030.8609 0.2277 6.2300e-0030.2340Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2OExhaust PM10PM10 Total Fugitive PM2 5Exhaust PM2 5PM2.5 Total4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile4.1 Mitigation Measures MobileROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM100.00 0.00 0.00N20 CO2ePercent Reduction0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00PM2.5 TotalBio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4Fugitive PM10Exhaust PM10PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5Exhaust PM2.5ROG NOx CO SO2
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1Date: 6/16/2021 7:28 PMBeltramo Existing Uses OPS ONLY - Ventura County, WinterEMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied61.0407 61.0407 1.1700e-0031.1200e-003 61.40341.1700e-0031.1200e-003 61.4034NaturalGas Unmitigated5.6000e-0030.0501 0.0371 3.1000e-004 3.8700e-0033.8700e-003 3.8700e-0033.8700e-0033.8700e-0033.8700e-003 61.0407 61.04073.1000e-004 3.8700e-0033.8700e-003NaturalGas Mitigated5.6000e-0030.0501 0.0371CH4 N2O CO2eCategory lb/daylb/dayExhaust PM2.5PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2SO2 Fugitive PM10Exhaust PM10PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5ROG NOx CO0.000646 0.007305.0 Energy DetailHistorical Energy Use: N5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy0.000393 0.029232 0.000646 0.00730Single Family Housing 0.543528 0.058189 0.173108 0.133952 0.027894 0.007577 0.011427 0.006062 0.000688 0.000393 0.0292320.027894 0.007577 0.011427 0.006062 0.000688Place of Worship 0.543528 0.058189 0.173108 0.133952OBUS UBUS MCY SBUS MHMDV LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD4.4 Fleet MixLand Use LDA LDT1 LDT218.00 49.10 86 11 3Single Family Housing 10.80 7.30 7.50 32.9095.00 5.00 64 25 11Place of Worship 9.50 7.30 7.30 0.00H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW Primary Diverted Pass-byLand Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW H-W or C-W4.3 Trip Type InformationMiles Trip % Trip Purpose %
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1Date: 6/16/2021 7:28 PMBeltramo Existing Uses OPS ONLY - Ventura County, WinterEMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied61.0407 61.0407 1.1700e-003 1.1200e-00361.40342.8000e-00415.4970Total 5.5900e-003 0.0501 0.0371 3.1000e-0043.8700e-003 3.8700e-003 3.8700e-0033.8700e-0039.8000e-004 15.4055 15.4055 3.0000e-00445.6352 8.7000e-004 8.4000e-00445.9064Single Family Housing0.130947 1.4100e-003 0.0121 5.1400e-003 8.0000e-0059.8000e-004 9.8000e-004 9.8000e-0042.8900e-0032.8900e-003 45.63520.0319 2.3000e-0042.8900e-003 2.8900e-003Place of Worship 0.387899 4.1800e-003 0.0380CH4 N2O CO2eLand Use kBTU/yr lb/daylb/dayExhaust PM2.5PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2MitigatedNaturalGas UseROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10Exhaust PM10PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.561.0407 61.0407 1.1700e-003 1.1200e-00361.40342.8000e-00415.4970Total 5.5900e-003 0.0501 0.0371 3.1000e-0043.8700e-003 3.8700e-003 3.8700e-0033.8700e-0039.8000e-004 15.4055 15.4055 3.0000e-00445.6352 8.7000e-004 8.4000e-00445.9064Single Family Housing130.947 1.4100e-003 0.0121 5.1400e-003 8.0000e-0059.8000e-004 9.8000e-004 9.8000e-0042.8900e-0032.8900e-003 45.63520.0319 2.3000e-0042.8900e-003 2.8900e-003Place of Worship 387.899 4.1800e-003 0.0380CH4 N2O CO2eLand Use kBTU/yr lb/daylb/dayExhaust PM2.5PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO25.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGasUnmitigatedNaturalGas UseROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10Exhaust PM10PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1Date: 6/16/2021 7:28 PMBeltramo Existing Uses OPS ONLY - Ventura County, WinterEMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied2.9000e-0040.0000 0.30580.3058Unmitigated 0.2554 1.9100e-003 0.1657 1.0000e-005 9.2000e-0049.2000e-004 9.2000e-0049.2000e-004 0.0000 0.2986 0.29860.0000 0.2986 0.2986 2.9000e-0040.0000CO2eCategory lb/daylb/dayMitigated 0.2554 1.9100e-003 0.1657 1.0000e-005 9.2000e-0049.2000e-004 9.2000e-0049.2000e-004Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2OExhaust PM10PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5Exhaust PM2.5PM2.5 Total6.0 Area Detail6.1 Mitigation Measures AreaROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1Date: 6/16/2021 7:28 PMBeltramo Existing Uses OPS ONLY - Ventura County, WinterEMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied2.9000e-0040.0000 0.30589.2000e-0049.2000e-004 0.0000 0.2986 0.29861.0000e-005 9.2000e-0049.2000e-004Total 0.2554 1.9100e-003 0.16570.2986 0.2986 2.9000e-0040.30580.0000 0.0000 0.0000Landscaping 5.0400e-0031.9100e-003 0.1657 1.0000e-005 9.2000e-0049.2000e-004 9.2000e-0049.2000e-0040.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hearth 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.00000.0000Consumer Products0.2230 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000Architectural Coating0.0274CH4 N2O CO2eSubCategory lb/daylb/dayExhaust PM2.5PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2SO2 Fugitive PM10Exhaust PM10PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5ROG NOx CO6.2 Area by SubCategoryUnmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1Date: 6/16/2021 7:28 PMBeltramo Existing Uses OPS ONLY - Ventura County, WinterEMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied8.0 Waste Detail8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste2.9000e-0040.0000 0.30587.0 Water Detail7.1 Mitigation Measures Water9.2000e-0049.2000e-004 0.0000 0.2986 0.29861.0000e-005 9.2000e-0049.2000e-004Total 0.2554 1.9100e-003 0.16570.2986 0.2986 2.9000e-0040.30580.0000 0.0000 0.0000Landscaping 5.0400e-0031.9100e-003 0.1657 1.0000e-005 9.2000e-0049.2000e-004 9.2000e-0049.2000e-0040.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hearth 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.00000.0000Consumer Products0.2230 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000Architectural Coating0.0274CH4 N2O CO2eSubCategory lb/daylb/dayExhaust PM2.5PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2SO2 Fugitive PM10Exhaust PM10PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5ROG NOx COMitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1Date: 6/16/2021 7:28 PMBeltramo Existing Uses OPS ONLY - Ventura County, WinterEMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule AppliedFuel TypeUser Defined EquipmentEquipment Type Number11.0 VegetationEquipment Type Number Heat Input/Day Heat Input/Year Boiler RatingHours/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel TypeBoilers10.0 Stationary EquipmentFire Pumps and Emergency GeneratorsEquipment Type Number Hours/DayHours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type9.0 Operational OffroadEquipment Type Number
APPENDIX B
CalEEMod Model Annual Emissions Printouts
Beltramo Ranch
Ventura County, Annual
Project Characteristics -
Land Use - 47 SFDs with ~1.85 ac of on-site roads, ~56,000 SF of open space on ~7.4 acres
Construction Phase - Construction to start ~ Jan 2023 and take ~19 months to complete.
Trips and VMT - 1 vendor trip added to demo for the removal and transport of the triple-wide trailer offsite to 11450 Mission Blvd, Mira Loma (93.8 miles).
Vehicle calss changed to HHDT.
Demolition - 7,402 SF of demo (4,274 SF of existing residences and church, 3,128 SF of mobile homes) = 340.5 tons. 74,225 SF of asphalt and paving = 501
tons. Total tons of demo = 841.5 tons
Grading - ~2553 CY of import.
Architectural Coating - Area of roads to be painted = 6% of 80,586 SF = 4,835 SF
Area Coating - Area of roads to be painted = 6% of 80,586 SF = 4,835 SF
Sequestration - ~345 new trees to be planted on-site
1.1 Land Usage
Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area Population
Other Asphalt Surfaces 1.85 Acre 1.85 80,586.00 0
Other Non-Asphalt Surfaces 56.00 1000sqft 1.29 56,000.00 0
Single Family Housing 47.00 Dwelling Unit 4.26 84,600.00 144
1.2 Other Project Characteristics
Urbanization
Climate Zone
Urban
8
Wind Speed (m/s)Precipitation Freq (Days)2.6 31
1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data
1.0 Project Characteristics
Utility Company Southern California Edison
2024Operational Year
CO2 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
390.98 0.033CH4 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
0.004N2O Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 2/28/2022 8:26 AMPage 1 of 34
Beltramo Ranch - Ventura County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
Construction Off-road Equipment Mitigation -
Water Mitigation - 20% reduction in indoor water use per CalGreen requirements.
Waste Mitigation - Assumed least 50% of waste will be diverted.
Woodstoves -
2.0 Emissions Summary
Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value
tblArchitecturalCoating ConstArea_Parking 8,195.00 4,835.00
tblAreaCoating Area_Parking 8195 4835
tblConstDustMitigation WaterUnpavedRoadVehicleSpeed 0 15
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 20.00 30.00
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 20.00 120.00
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 20.00 55.00
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 20.00 55.00
tblGrading MaterialImported 0.00 2,553.00
tblLandUse LotAcreage 15.26 4.26
tblSequestration NumberOfNewTrees 0.00 345.00
tblTripsAndVMT VendorTripLength 7.30 93.80
tblTripsAndVMT VendorTripNumber 0.00 1.00
tblTripsAndVMT VendorVehicleClass HDT_Mix HHDT
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 2/28/2022 8:26 AMPage 2 of 34
Beltramo Ranch - Ventura County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
2.1 Overall Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year tons/yr MT/yr
2023 0.2400 2.2914 2.2312 4.6200e-
003
0.4907 0.1008 0.5914 0.2222 0.0937 0.3158 0.0000 409.7871 409.7871 0.0984 7.4500e-
003
414.4654
2024 0.5798 1.1750 1.5663 2.9700e-
003
0.0533 0.0520 0.1052 0.0144 0.0487 0.0631 0.0000 262.5646 262.5646 0.0533 5.2600e-
003
265.4649
Maximum 0.5798 2.2914 2.2312 4.6200e-
003
0.4907 0.1008 0.5914 0.2222 0.0937 0.3158 0.0000 409.7871 409.7871 0.0984 7.4500e-
003
414.4654
Unmitigated Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year tons/yr MT/yr
2023 0.2400 2.2914 2.2312 4.6200e-
003
0.2519 0.1008 0.3526 0.1084 0.0937 0.2020 0.0000 409.7867 409.7867 0.0984 7.4500e-
003
414.4650
2024 0.5798 1.1750 1.5663 2.9700e-
003
0.0533 0.0520 0.1052 0.0144 0.0487 0.0631 0.0000 262.5643 262.5643 0.0533 5.2600e-
003
265.4646
Maximum 0.5798 2.2914 2.2312 4.6200e-
003
0.2519 0.1008 0.3526 0.1084 0.0937 0.2020 0.0000 409.7867 409.7867 0.0984 7.4500e-
003
414.4650
Mitigated Construction
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 2/28/2022 8:26 AMPage 3 of 34
Beltramo Ranch - Ventura County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent
Reduction
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 43.91 0.00 34.28 48.11 0.00 30.03 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Quarter Start Date End Date Maximum Unmitigated ROG + NOX (tons/quarter)Maximum Mitigated ROG + NOX (tons/quarter)
1 1-2-2023 4-1-2023 0.7112 0.7112
2 4-2-2023 7-1-2023 0.6513 0.6513
3 7-2-2023 10-1-2023 0.5961 0.5961
4 10-2-2023 1-1-2024 0.5725 0.5725
5 1-2-2024 4-1-2024 0.5316 0.5316
6 4-2-2024 7-1-2024 0.6012 0.6012
7 7-2-2024 9-30-2024 0.6038 0.6038
Highest 0.7112 0.7112
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 2/28/2022 8:26 AMPage 4 of 34
Beltramo Ranch - Ventura County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
2.2 Overall Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Area 0.3939 4.0200e-
003
0.3494 2.0000e-
005
1.9400e-
003
1.9400e-
003
1.9400e-
003
1.9400e-
003
0.0000 0.5711 0.5711 5.5000e-
004
0.0000 0.5848
Energy 6.0600e-
003
0.0518 0.0220 3.3000e-
004
4.1800e-
003
4.1800e-
003
4.1800e-
003
4.1800e-
003
0.0000 125.1036 125.1036 6.6500e-
003
1.7700e-
003
125.7959
Mobile 0.2245 0.2676 2.0828 4.2000e-
003
0.4562 3.3600e-
003
0.4595 0.1218 3.1400e-
003
0.1249 0.0000 393.8114 393.8114 0.0271 0.0187 400.0578
Waste 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 11.9846 0.0000 11.9846 0.7083 0.0000 29.6913
Water 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.9715 10.8751 11.8466 0.1007 2.4700e-
003
15.0994
Total 0.6244 0.3234 2.4542 4.5500e-
003
0.4562 9.4800e-
003
0.4657 0.1218 9.2600e-
003
0.1310 12.9561 530.3612 543.3173 0.8432 0.0229 571.2293
Unmitigated Operational
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 2/28/2022 8:26 AMPage 5 of 34
Beltramo Ranch - Ventura County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
2.2 Overall Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Area 0.3939 4.0200e-
003
0.3494 2.0000e-
005
1.9400e-
003
1.9400e-
003
1.9400e-
003
1.9400e-
003
0.0000 0.5711 0.5711 5.5000e-
004
0.0000 0.5848
Energy 6.0600e-
003
0.0518 0.0220 3.3000e-
004
4.1800e-
003
4.1800e-
003
4.1800e-
003
4.1800e-
003
0.0000 125.1036 125.1036 6.6500e-
003
1.7700e-
003
125.7959
Mobile 0.2245 0.2676 2.0828 4.2000e-
003
0.4562 3.3600e-
003
0.4595 0.1218 3.1400e-
003
0.1249 0.0000 393.8114 393.8114 0.0271 0.0187 400.0578
Waste 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 5.9923 0.0000 5.9923 0.3541 0.0000 14.8457
Water 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.7772 9.4609 10.2381 0.0806 1.9800e-
003
12.8442
Total 0.6244 0.3234 2.4542 4.5500e-
003
0.4562 9.4800e-
003
0.4657 0.1218 9.2600e-
003
0.1310 6.7695 528.9469 535.7164 0.4690 0.0224 554.1284
Mitigated Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent
Reduction
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 47.75 0.27 1.40 44.38 2.14 2.99
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 2/28/2022 8:26 AMPage 6 of 34
Beltramo Ranch - Ventura County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
3.0 Construction Detail
2.3 Vegetation
CO2e
Category MT
New Trees 244.2600
Total 244.2600
Vegetation
Construction Phase
Phase
Number
Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Num Days
Week
Num Days Phase Description
1 Demolition Demolition 1/2/2023 2/10/2023 5 30
2 Grading Grading 2/11/2023 7/28/2023 5 120
3 Building Construction Building Construction 7/29/2023 6/14/2024 5 230
4 Paving Paving 6/15/2024 8/30/2024 5 55
5 Architectural Coating Architectural Coating 6/15/2024 8/30/2024 5 55
Residential Indoor: 171,315; Residential Outdoor: 57,105; Non-Residential Indoor: 0; Non-Residential Outdoor: 0; Striped Parking Area: 4,835
(Architectural Coating – sqft)
Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 0
Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 120
Acres of Paving: 3.14
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 2/28/2022 8:26 AMPage 7 of 34
Beltramo Ranch - Ventura County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction
OffRoad Equipment
Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours Horse Power Load Factor
Demolition Concrete/Industrial Saws 1 8.00 81 0.73
Demolition Excavators 3 8.00 158 0.38
Demolition Rubber Tired Dozers 2 8.00 247 0.40
Grading Excavators 1 8.00 158 0.38
Grading Graders 1 8.00 187 0.41
Grading Rubber Tired Dozers 1 8.00 247 0.40
Grading Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3 8.00 97 0.37
Building Construction Cranes 1 7.00 231 0.29
Building Construction Forklifts 3 8.00 89 0.20
Building Construction Generator Sets 1 8.00 84 0.74
Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3 7.00 97 0.37
Building Construction Welders 1 8.00 46 0.45
Paving Pavers 2 8.00 130 0.42
Paving Paving Equipment 2 8.00 132 0.36
Paving Rollers 2 8.00 80 0.38
Architectural Coating Air Compressors 1 6.00 78 0.48
Trips and VMT
Phase Name Offroad Equipment
Count
Worker Trip
Number
Vendor Trip
Number
Hauling Trip
Number
Worker Trip
Length
Vendor Trip
Length
Hauling Trip
Length
Worker Vehicle
Class
Vendor
Vehicle Class
Hauling
Vehicle Class
Demolition 6 15.00 1.00 83.00 10.80 93.80 20.00 LD_Mix HHDT HHDT
Grading 6 15.00 0.00 319.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT
Building Construction 9 74.00 27.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT
Paving 6 15.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT
Architectural Coating 1 15.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 2/28/2022 8:26 AMPage 8 of 34
Beltramo Ranch - Ventura County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
3.2 Demolition - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 9.1200e-
003
0.0000 9.1200e-
003
1.3800e-
003
0.0000 1.3800e-
003
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Off-Road 0.0340 0.3223 0.2947 5.8000e-
004
0.0150 0.0150 0.0139 0.0139 0.0000 50.9881 50.9881 0.0143 0.0000 51.3451
Total 0.0340 0.3223 0.2947 5.8000e-
004
9.1200e-
003
0.0150 0.0241 1.3800e-
003
0.0139 0.0153 0.0000 50.9881 50.9881 0.0143 0.0000 51.3451
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
Water Exposed Area
Reduce Vehicle Speed on Unpaved Roads
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 2/28/2022 8:26 AMPage 9 of 34
Beltramo Ranch - Ventura County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
3.2 Demolition - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 8.0000e-
005
5.1900e-
003
1.4300e-
003
2.0000e-
005
7.1000e-
004
4.0000e-
005
7.5000e-
004
2.0000e-
004
4.0000e-
005
2.3000e-
004
0.0000 2.3573 2.3573 1.6000e-
004
3.8000e-
004
2.4732
Vendor 9.0000e-
005
7.7700e-
003
1.6400e-
003
4.0000e-
005
1.2100e-
003
6.0000e-
005
1.2700e-
003
3.3000e-
004
6.0000e-
005
3.9000e-
004
0.0000 3.8628 3.8628 2.7000e-
004
6.2000e-
004
4.0528
Worker 6.4000e-
004
4.5000e-
004
5.6000e-
003
2.0000e-
005
1.8100e-
003
1.0000e-
005
1.8200e-
003
4.8000e-
004
1.0000e-
005
4.9000e-
004
0.0000 1.4108 1.4108 5.0000e-
005
4.0000e-
005
1.4243
Total 8.1000e-
004
0.0134 8.6700e-
003
8.0000e-
005
3.7300e-
003
1.1000e-
004
3.8400e-
003
1.0100e-
003
1.1000e-
004
1.1100e-
003
0.0000 7.6309 7.6309 4.8000e-
004
1.0400e-
003
7.9503
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 4.1000e-
003
0.0000 4.1000e-
003
6.2000e-
004
0.0000 6.2000e-
004
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Off-Road 0.0340 0.3223 0.2947 5.8000e-
004
0.0150 0.0150 0.0139 0.0139 0.0000 50.9880 50.9880 0.0143 0.0000 51.3450
Total 0.0340 0.3223 0.2947 5.8000e-
004
4.1000e-
003
0.0150 0.0191 6.2000e-
004
0.0139 0.0145 0.0000 50.9880 50.9880 0.0143 0.0000 51.3450
Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 2/28/2022 8:26 AMPage 10 of 34
Beltramo Ranch - Ventura County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
3.2 Demolition - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 8.0000e-
005
5.1900e-
003
1.4300e-
003
2.0000e-
005
7.1000e-
004
4.0000e-
005
7.5000e-
004
2.0000e-
004
4.0000e-
005
2.3000e-
004
0.0000 2.3573 2.3573 1.6000e-
004
3.8000e-
004
2.4732
Vendor 9.0000e-
005
7.7700e-
003
1.6400e-
003
4.0000e-
005
1.2100e-
003
6.0000e-
005
1.2700e-
003
3.3000e-
004
6.0000e-
005
3.9000e-
004
0.0000 3.8628 3.8628 2.7000e-
004
6.2000e-
004
4.0528
Worker 6.4000e-
004
4.5000e-
004
5.6000e-
003
2.0000e-
005
1.8100e-
003
1.0000e-
005
1.8200e-
003
4.8000e-
004
1.0000e-
005
4.9000e-
004
0.0000 1.4108 1.4108 5.0000e-
005
4.0000e-
005
1.4243
Total 8.1000e-
004
0.0134 8.6700e-
003
8.0000e-
005
3.7300e-
003
1.1000e-
004
3.8400e-
003
1.0100e-
003
1.1000e-
004
1.1100e-
003
0.0000 7.6309 7.6309 4.8000e-
004
1.0400e-
003
7.9503
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
3.3 Grading - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 0.4251 0.0000 0.4251 0.2055 0.0000 0.2055 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Off-Road 0.1027 1.0762 0.8850 1.7800e-
003
0.0465 0.0465 0.0428 0.0428 0.0000 156.3637 156.3637 0.0506 0.0000 157.6280
Total 0.1027 1.0762 0.8850 1.7800e-
003
0.4251 0.0465 0.4716 0.2055 0.0428 0.2483 0.0000 156.3637 156.3637 0.0506 0.0000 157.6280
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 2/28/2022 8:26 AMPage 11 of 34
Beltramo Ranch - Ventura County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
3.3 Grading - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 3.1000e-
004
0.0200 5.4800e-
003
9.0000e-
005
2.7400e-
003
1.4000e-
004
2.8800e-
003
7.5000e-
004
1.3000e-
004
8.9000e-
004
0.0000 9.0599 9.0599 6.2000e-
004
1.4400e-
003
9.5054
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Worker 2.5700e-
003
1.8000e-
003
0.0224 6.0000e-
005
7.2600e-
003
4.0000e-
005
7.3000e-
003
1.9300e-
003
4.0000e-
005
1.9600e-
003
0.0000 5.6433 5.6433 1.8000e-
004
1.7000e-
004
5.6972
Total 2.8800e-
003
0.0218 0.0279 1.5000e-
004
0.0100 1.8000e-
004
0.0102 2.6800e-
003
1.7000e-
004
2.8500e-
003
0.0000 14.7032 14.7032 8.0000e-
004
1.6100e-
003
15.2026
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 0.1913 0.0000 0.1913 0.0925 0.0000 0.0925 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Off-Road 0.1027 1.0762 0.8850 1.7800e-
003
0.0465 0.0465 0.0428 0.0428 0.0000 156.3635 156.3635 0.0506 0.0000 157.6278
Total 0.1027 1.0762 0.8850 1.7800e-
003
0.1913 0.0465 0.2378 0.0925 0.0428 0.1353 0.0000 156.3635 156.3635 0.0506 0.0000 157.6278
Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 2/28/2022 8:26 AMPage 12 of 34
Beltramo Ranch - Ventura County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
3.3 Grading - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 3.1000e-
004
0.0200 5.4800e-
003
9.0000e-
005
2.7400e-
003
1.4000e-
004
2.8800e-
003
7.5000e-
004
1.3000e-
004
8.9000e-
004
0.0000 9.0599 9.0599 6.2000e-
004
1.4400e-
003
9.5054
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Worker 2.5700e-
003
1.8000e-
003
0.0224 6.0000e-
005
7.2600e-
003
4.0000e-
005
7.3000e-
003
1.9300e-
003
4.0000e-
005
1.9600e-
003
0.0000 5.6433 5.6433 1.8000e-
004
1.7000e-
004
5.6972
Total 2.8800e-
003
0.0218 0.0279 1.5000e-
004
0.0100 1.8000e-
004
0.0102 2.6800e-
003
1.7000e-
004
2.8500e-
003
0.0000 14.7032 14.7032 8.0000e-
004
1.6100e-
003
15.2026
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
3.4 Building Construction - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 0.0865 0.7912 0.8934 1.4800e-
003
0.0385 0.0385 0.0362 0.0362 0.0000 127.4926 127.4926 0.0303 0.0000 128.2508
Total 0.0865 0.7912 0.8934 1.4800e-
003
0.0385 0.0385 0.0362 0.0362 0.0000 127.4926 127.4926 0.0303 0.0000 128.2508
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 2/28/2022 8:26 AMPage 13 of 34
Beltramo Ranch - Ventura County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
3.4 Building Construction - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor 1.4400e-
003
0.0585 0.0203 2.8000e-
004
9.9000e-
003
3.4000e-
004
0.0102 2.8500e-
003
3.2000e-
004
3.1800e-
003
0.0000 27.0883 27.0883 1.1100e-
003
4.0600e-
003
28.3246
Worker 0.0116 8.1600e-
003
0.1013 2.7000e-
004
0.0328 1.8000e-
004
0.0330 8.7200e-
003
1.7000e-
004
8.8800e-
003
0.0000 25.5203 25.5203 8.2000e-
004
7.5000e-
004
25.7640
Total 0.0131 0.0666 0.1216 5.5000e-
004
0.0427 5.2000e-
004
0.0432 0.0116 4.9000e-
004
0.0121 0.0000 52.6086 52.6086 1.9300e-
003
4.8100e-
003
54.0886
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 0.0865 0.7912 0.8934 1.4800e-
003
0.0385 0.0385 0.0362 0.0362 0.0000 127.4925 127.4925 0.0303 0.0000 128.2507
Total 0.0865 0.7912 0.8934 1.4800e-
003
0.0385 0.0385 0.0362 0.0362 0.0000 127.4925 127.4925 0.0303 0.0000 128.2507
Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 2/28/2022 8:26 AMPage 14 of 34
Beltramo Ranch - Ventura County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
3.4 Building Construction - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor 1.4400e-
003
0.0585 0.0203 2.8000e-
004
9.9000e-
003
3.4000e-
004
0.0102 2.8500e-
003
3.2000e-
004
3.1800e-
003
0.0000 27.0883 27.0883 1.1100e-
003
4.0600e-
003
28.3246
Worker 0.0116 8.1600e-
003
0.1013 2.7000e-
004
0.0328 1.8000e-
004
0.0330 8.7200e-
003
1.7000e-
004
8.8800e-
003
0.0000 25.5203 25.5203 8.2000e-
004
7.5000e-
004
25.7640
Total 0.0131 0.0666 0.1216 5.5000e-
004
0.0427 5.2000e-
004
0.0432 0.0116 4.9000e-
004
0.0121 0.0000 52.6086 52.6086 1.9300e-
003
4.8100e-
003
54.0886
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
3.4 Building Construction - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 0.0883 0.8066 0.9700 1.6200e-
003
0.0368 0.0368 0.0346 0.0346 0.0000 139.1095 139.1095 0.0329 0.0000 139.9319
Total 0.0883 0.8066 0.9700 1.6200e-
003
0.0368 0.0368 0.0346 0.0346 0.0000 139.1095 139.1095 0.0329 0.0000 139.9319
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 2/28/2022 8:26 AMPage 15 of 34
Beltramo Ranch - Ventura County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
3.4 Building Construction - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor 1.5400e-
003
0.0635 0.0220 3.0000e-
004
0.0108 3.7000e-
004
0.0112 3.1100e-
003
3.5000e-
004
3.4700e-
003
0.0000 29.1052 29.1052 1.2400e-
003
4.3600e-
003
30.4345
Worker 0.0119 7.9900e-
003
0.1031 2.9000e-
004
0.0358 1.9000e-
004
0.0360 9.5100e-
003
1.7000e-
004
9.6800e-
003
0.0000 27.2012 27.2012 8.1000e-
004
7.6000e-
004
27.4487
Total 0.0134 0.0715 0.1251 5.9000e-
004
0.0466 5.6000e-
004
0.0472 0.0126 5.2000e-
004
0.0132 0.0000 56.3064 56.3064 2.0500e-
003
5.1200e-
003
57.8832
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 0.0883 0.8066 0.9700 1.6200e-
003
0.0368 0.0368 0.0346 0.0346 0.0000 139.1093 139.1093 0.0329 0.0000 139.9317
Total 0.0883 0.8066 0.9700 1.6200e-
003
0.0368 0.0368 0.0346 0.0346 0.0000 139.1093 139.1093 0.0329 0.0000 139.9317
Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 2/28/2022 8:26 AMPage 16 of 34
Beltramo Ranch - Ventura County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
3.4 Building Construction - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor 1.5400e-
003
0.0635 0.0220 3.0000e-
004
0.0108 3.7000e-
004
0.0112 3.1100e-
003
3.5000e-
004
3.4700e-
003
0.0000 29.1052 29.1052 1.2400e-
003
4.3600e-
003
30.4345
Worker 0.0119 7.9900e-
003
0.1031 2.9000e-
004
0.0358 1.9000e-
004
0.0360 9.5100e-
003
1.7000e-
004
9.6800e-
003
0.0000 27.2012 27.2012 8.1000e-
004
7.6000e-
004
27.4487
Total 0.0134 0.0715 0.1251 5.9000e-
004
0.0466 5.6000e-
004
0.0472 0.0126 5.2000e-
004
0.0132 0.0000 56.3064 56.3064 2.0500e-
003
5.1200e-
003
57.8832
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
3.5 Paving - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 0.0272 0.2619 0.4022 6.3000e-
004
0.0129 0.0129 0.0119 0.0119 0.0000 55.0730 55.0730 0.0178 0.0000 55.5183
Paving 2.4200e-
003
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Total 0.0296 0.2619 0.4022 6.3000e-
004
0.0129 0.0129 0.0119 0.0119 0.0000 55.0730 55.0730 0.0178 0.0000 55.5183
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 2/28/2022 8:26 AMPage 17 of 34
Beltramo Ranch - Ventura County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
3.5 Paving - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Worker 1.1000e-
003
7.4000e-
004
9.5800e-
003
3.0000e-
005
3.3300e-
003
2.0000e-
005
3.3400e-
003
8.8000e-
004
2.0000e-
005
9.0000e-
004
0.0000 2.5271 2.5271 8.0000e-
005
7.0000e-
005
2.5501
Total 1.1000e-
003
7.4000e-
004
9.5800e-
003
3.0000e-
005
3.3300e-
003
2.0000e-
005
3.3400e-
003
8.8000e-
004
2.0000e-
005
9.0000e-
004
0.0000 2.5271 2.5271 8.0000e-
005
7.0000e-
005
2.5501
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 0.0272 0.2619 0.4022 6.3000e-
004
0.0129 0.0129 0.0119 0.0119 0.0000 55.0729 55.0729 0.0178 0.0000 55.5182
Paving 2.4200e-
003
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Total 0.0296 0.2619 0.4022 6.3000e-
004
0.0129 0.0129 0.0119 0.0119 0.0000 55.0729 55.0729 0.0178 0.0000 55.5182
Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 2/28/2022 8:26 AMPage 18 of 34
Beltramo Ranch - Ventura County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
3.5 Paving - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Worker 1.1000e-
003
7.4000e-
004
9.5800e-
003
3.0000e-
005
3.3300e-
003
2.0000e-
005
3.3400e-
003
8.8000e-
004
2.0000e-
005
9.0000e-
004
0.0000 2.5271 2.5271 8.0000e-
005
7.0000e-
005
2.5501
Total 1.1000e-
003
7.4000e-
004
9.5800e-
003
3.0000e-
005
3.3300e-
003
2.0000e-
005
3.3400e-
003
8.8000e-
004
2.0000e-
005
9.0000e-
004
0.0000 2.5271 2.5271 8.0000e-
005
7.0000e-
005
2.5501
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
3.6 Architectural Coating - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Archit. Coating 0.4413 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Off-Road 4.9700e-
003
0.0335 0.0498 8.0000e-
005
1.6800e-
003
1.6800e-
003
1.6800e-
003
1.6800e-
003
0.0000 7.0215 7.0215 4.0000e-
004
0.0000 7.0313
Total 0.4463 0.0335 0.0498 8.0000e-
005
1.6800e-
003
1.6800e-
003
1.6800e-
003
1.6800e-
003
0.0000 7.0215 7.0215 4.0000e-
004
0.0000 7.0313
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 2/28/2022 8:26 AMPage 19 of 34
Beltramo Ranch - Ventura County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
3.6 Architectural Coating - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Worker 1.1000e-
003
7.4000e-
004
9.5800e-
003
3.0000e-
005
3.3300e-
003
2.0000e-
005
3.3400e-
003
8.8000e-
004
2.0000e-
005
9.0000e-
004
0.0000 2.5271 2.5271 8.0000e-
005
7.0000e-
005
2.5501
Total 1.1000e-
003
7.4000e-
004
9.5800e-
003
3.0000e-
005
3.3300e-
003
2.0000e-
005
3.3400e-
003
8.8000e-
004
2.0000e-
005
9.0000e-
004
0.0000 2.5271 2.5271 8.0000e-
005
7.0000e-
005
2.5501
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Archit. Coating 0.4413 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Off-Road 4.9700e-
003
0.0335 0.0498 8.0000e-
005
1.6800e-
003
1.6800e-
003
1.6800e-
003
1.6800e-
003
0.0000 7.0214 7.0214 4.0000e-
004
0.0000 7.0313
Total 0.4463 0.0335 0.0498 8.0000e-
005
1.6800e-
003
1.6800e-
003
1.6800e-
003
1.6800e-
003
0.0000 7.0214 7.0214 4.0000e-
004
0.0000 7.0313
Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 2/28/2022 8:26 AMPage 20 of 34
Beltramo Ranch - Ventura County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
3.6 Architectural Coating - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Worker 1.1000e-
003
7.4000e-
004
9.5800e-
003
3.0000e-
005
3.3300e-
003
2.0000e-
005
3.3400e-
003
8.8000e-
004
2.0000e-
005
9.0000e-
004
0.0000 2.5271 2.5271 8.0000e-
005
7.0000e-
005
2.5501
Total 1.1000e-
003
7.4000e-
004
9.5800e-
003
3.0000e-
005
3.3300e-
003
2.0000e-
005
3.3400e-
003
8.8000e-
004
2.0000e-
005
9.0000e-
004
0.0000 2.5271 2.5271 8.0000e-
005
7.0000e-
005
2.5501
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile
4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 2/28/2022 8:26 AMPage 21 of 34
Beltramo Ranch - Ventura County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Mitigated 0.2245 0.2676 2.0828 4.2000e-
003
0.4562 3.3600e-
003
0.4595 0.1218 3.1400e-
003
0.1249 0.0000 393.8114 393.8114 0.0271 0.0187 400.0578
Unmitigated 0.2245 0.2676 2.0828 4.2000e-
003
0.4562 3.3600e-
003
0.4595 0.1218 3.1400e-
003
0.1249 0.0000 393.8114 393.8114 0.0271 0.0187 400.0578
4.2 Trip Summary Information
4.3 Trip Type Information
Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated
Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT Annual VMT
Other Asphalt Surfaces 0.00 0.00 0.00
Other Non-Asphalt Surfaces 0.00 0.00 0.00
Single Family Housing 443.68 448.38 401.85 1,211,264 1,211,264
Total 443.68 448.38 401.85 1,211,264 1,211,264
Miles Trip %Trip Purpose %
Land Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW Primary Diverted Pass-by
Other Asphalt Surfaces 9.50 7.30 7.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0
Other Non-Asphalt Surfaces 9.50 7.30 7.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0
Single Family Housing 10.80 7.30 7.50 32.90 18.00 49.10 86 11 3
4.4 Fleet Mix
Land Use LDA LDT1 LDT2 MDV LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY SBUS MH
Other Asphalt Surfaces 0.548670 0.058343 0.171689 0.130773 0.027316 0.007545 0.011806 0.006161 0.000681 0.000392 0.029028 0.000637 0.006958
Other Non-Asphalt Surfaces 0.548670 0.058343 0.171689 0.130773 0.027316 0.007545 0.011806 0.006161 0.000681 0.000392 0.029028 0.000637 0.006958
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 2/28/2022 8:26 AMPage 22 of 34
Beltramo Ranch - Ventura County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
Single Family Housing 0.548670 0.058343 0.171689 0.130773 0.027316 0.007545 0.011806 0.006161 0.000681 0.000392 0.029028 0.000637 0.006958
5.0 Energy Detail
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Electricity
Mitigated
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 65.1657 65.1657 5.5000e-
003
6.7000e-
004
65.5018
Electricity
Unmitigated
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 65.1657 65.1657 5.5000e-
003
6.7000e-
004
65.5018
NaturalGas
Mitigated
6.0600e-
003
0.0518 0.0220 3.3000e-
004
4.1800e-
003
4.1800e-
003
4.1800e-
003
4.1800e-
003
0.0000 59.9379 59.9379 1.1500e-
003
1.1000e-
003
60.2941
NaturalGas
Unmitigated
6.0600e-
003
0.0518 0.0220 3.3000e-
004
4.1800e-
003
4.1800e-
003
4.1800e-
003
4.1800e-
003
0.0000 59.9379 59.9379 1.1500e-
003
1.1000e-
003
60.2941
5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy
Historical Energy Use: N
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 2/28/2022 8:26 AMPage 23 of 34
Beltramo Ranch - Ventura County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kBTU/yr tons/yr MT/yr
Other Asphalt
Surfaces
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Other Non-
Asphalt Surfaces
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Single Family
Housing
1.12319e
+006
6.0600e-
003
0.0518 0.0220 3.3000e-
004
4.1800e-
003
4.1800e-
003
4.1800e-
003
4.1800e-
003
0.0000 59.9379 59.9379 1.1500e-
003
1.1000e-
003
60.2941
Total 6.0600e-
003
0.0518 0.0220 3.3000e-
004
4.1800e-
003
4.1800e-
003
4.1800e-
003
4.1800e-
003
0.0000 59.9379 59.9379 1.1500e-
003
1.1000e-
003
60.2941
Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 2/28/2022 8:26 AMPage 24 of 34
Beltramo Ranch - Ventura County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kBTU/yr tons/yr MT/yr
Other Asphalt
Surfaces
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Other Non-
Asphalt Surfaces
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Single Family
Housing
1.12319e
+006
6.0600e-
003
0.0518 0.0220 3.3000e-
004
4.1800e-
003
4.1800e-
003
4.1800e-
003
4.1800e-
003
0.0000 59.9379 59.9379 1.1500e-
003
1.1000e-
003
60.2941
Total 6.0600e-
003
0.0518 0.0220 3.3000e-
004
4.1800e-
003
4.1800e-
003
4.1800e-
003
4.1800e-
003
0.0000 59.9379 59.9379 1.1500e-
003
1.1000e-
003
60.2941
Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 2/28/2022 8:26 AMPage 25 of 34
Beltramo Ranch - Ventura County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
5.3 Energy by Land Use - Electricity
Electricity
Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kWh/yr MT/yr
Other Asphalt
Surfaces
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Other Non-
Asphalt Surfaces
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Single Family
Housing
367450 65.1657 5.5000e-
003
6.7000e-
004
65.5018
Total 65.1657 5.5000e-
003
6.7000e-
004
65.5018
Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 2/28/2022 8:26 AMPage 26 of 34
Beltramo Ranch - Ventura County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
6.1 Mitigation Measures Area
6.0 Area Detail
5.3 Energy by Land Use - Electricity
Electricity
Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kWh/yr MT/yr
Other Asphalt
Surfaces
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Other Non-
Asphalt Surfaces
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Single Family
Housing
367450 65.1657 5.5000e-
003
6.7000e-
004
65.5018
Total 65.1657 5.5000e-
003
6.7000e-
004
65.5018
Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 2/28/2022 8:26 AMPage 27 of 34
Beltramo Ranch - Ventura County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Mitigated 0.3939 4.0200e-
003
0.3494 2.0000e-
005
1.9400e-
003
1.9400e-
003
1.9400e-
003
1.9400e-
003
0.0000 0.5711 0.5711 5.5000e-
004
0.0000 0.5848
Unmitigated 0.3939 4.0200e-
003
0.3494 2.0000e-
005
1.9400e-
003
1.9400e-
003
1.9400e-
003
1.9400e-
003
0.0000 0.5711 0.5711 5.5000e-
004
0.0000 0.5848
6.2 Area by SubCategory
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
SubCategory tons/yr MT/yr
Architectural
Coating
0.0441 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Consumer
Products
0.3392 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Hearth 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Landscaping 0.0105 4.0200e-
003
0.3494 2.0000e-
005
1.9400e-
003
1.9400e-
003
1.9400e-
003
1.9400e-
003
0.0000 0.5711 0.5711 5.5000e-
004
0.0000 0.5848
Total 0.3939 4.0200e-
003
0.3494 2.0000e-
005
1.9400e-
003
1.9400e-
003
1.9400e-
003
1.9400e-
003
0.0000 0.5711 0.5711 5.5000e-
004
0.0000 0.5848
Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 2/28/2022 8:26 AMPage 28 of 34
Beltramo Ranch - Ventura County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
Apply Water Conservation Strategy
7.1 Mitigation Measures Water
7.0 Water Detail
6.2 Area by SubCategory
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
SubCategory tons/yr MT/yr
Architectural
Coating
0.0441 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Consumer
Products
0.3392 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Hearth 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Landscaping 0.0105 4.0200e-
003
0.3494 2.0000e-
005
1.9400e-
003
1.9400e-
003
1.9400e-
003
1.9400e-
003
0.0000 0.5711 0.5711 5.5000e-
004
0.0000 0.5848
Total 0.3939 4.0200e-
003
0.3494 2.0000e-
005
1.9400e-
003
1.9400e-
003
1.9400e-
003
1.9400e-
003
0.0000 0.5711 0.5711 5.5000e-
004
0.0000 0.5848
Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 2/28/2022 8:26 AMPage 29 of 34
Beltramo Ranch - Ventura County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category MT/yr
Mitigated 10.2381 0.0806 1.9800e-
003
12.8442
Unmitigated 11.8466 0.1007 2.4700e-
003
15.0994
7.2 Water by Land Use
Indoor/Out
door Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use Mgal MT/yr
Other Asphalt
Surfaces
0 / 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Other Non-
Asphalt Surfaces
0 / 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Single Family
Housing
3.06224 /
1.93054
11.8466 0.1007 2.4700e-
003
15.0994
Total 11.8466 0.1007 2.4700e-
003
15.0994
Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 2/28/2022 8:26 AMPage 30 of 34
Beltramo Ranch - Ventura County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
7.2 Water by Land Use
Indoor/Out
door Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use Mgal MT/yr
Other Asphalt
Surfaces
0 / 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Other Non-
Asphalt Surfaces
0 / 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Single Family
Housing
2.44979 /
1.93054
10.2381 0.0806 1.9800e-
003
12.8442
Total 10.2381 0.0806 1.9800e-
003
12.8442
Mitigated
8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste
Institute Recycling and Composting Services
8.0 Waste Detail
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 2/28/2022 8:26 AMPage 31 of 34
Beltramo Ranch - Ventura County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
MT/yr
Mitigated 5.9923 0.3541 0.0000 14.8457
Unmitigated 11.9846 0.7083 0.0000 29.6913
Category/Year
8.2 Waste by Land Use
Waste
Disposed
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use tons MT/yr
Other Asphalt
Surfaces
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Other Non-
Asphalt Surfaces
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Single Family
Housing
59.04 11.9846 0.7083 0.0000 29.6913
Total 11.9846 0.7083 0.0000 29.6913
Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 2/28/2022 8:26 AMPage 32 of 34
Beltramo Ranch - Ventura County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
8.2 Waste by Land Use
Waste
Disposed
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use tons MT/yr
Other Asphalt
Surfaces
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Other Non-
Asphalt Surfaces
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Single Family
Housing
29.52 5.9923 0.3541 0.0000 14.8457
Total 5.9923 0.3541 0.0000 14.8457
Mitigated
9.0 Operational Offroad
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type
10.0 Stationary Equipment
Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Hours/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type
Boilers
Equipment Type Number Heat Input/Day Heat Input/Year Boiler Rating Fuel Type
User Defined Equipment
Equipment Type Number
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 2/28/2022 8:26 AMPage 33 of 34
Beltramo Ranch - Ventura County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
11.0 Vegetation
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category MT
Unmitigated 244.2600 0.0000 0.0000 244.2600
11.2 Net New Trees
Number of
Trees
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
MT
Miscellaneous 345 244.2600 0.0000 0.0000 244.2600
Total 244.2600 0.0000 0.0000 244.2600
Species Class
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 2/28/2022 8:26 AMPage 34 of 34
Beltramo Ranch - Ventura County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value2.0 Emissions SummaryN2O Intensity (lb/MWhr)0.0041.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default DataProject Characteristics - OPERATIONAL EMISSIONS ONLYLand Use - 6,820 SF church and 2 SFDsUtility CompanySouthern California EdisonCO2 Intensity (lb/MWhr)531.98CH4 Intensity (lb/MWhr)0.033Precipitation Freq (Days)31Climate Zone8Operational Year20231.2 Other Project CharacteristicsUrbanizationUrbanWind Speed (m/s)2.60Single Family Housing 2.00 Dwelling Unit 0.65 3,600.00 6Place of Worship 6.82 1000sqft 0.16 6,820.00Beltramo Existing Uses OPS ONLYVentura County, Annual1.0 Project Characteristics1.1 Land UsageLand Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area PopulationCalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1Date: 6/16/2021 7:29 PMBeltramo Existing Uses OPS ONLY - Ventura County, AnnualEMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1Date: 6/16/2021 7:29 PMBeltramo Existing Uses OPS ONLY - Ventura County, AnnualEMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied88.9151 97.4137 0.5130 3.6500e-003 111.32700.0113 2.8000e-004 2.6711Total 0.0872 0.0536 0.3619 6.9000e-004 0.0663 1.3100e-0030.0677 0.0177 1.2800e-0030.0190 8.49870.0000 0.0000 0.1090 2.1949 2.30400.0000 0.0000Water0.0000 8.3896 0.4958 0.0000 20.78494.6000e-0033.0500e-003 60.2313Waste0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 8.38964.9000e-0040.0182 0.0000 59.2070 59.20706.3000e-004 0.0663 5.2000e-0040.0669 0.0177Mobile 0.0400 0.0443 0.340227.4888 27.4888 1.2700e-0033.2000e-004 27.61482.0000e-0050.0000 0.0250Energy 1.0200e-0039.1400e-003 6.7700e-0036.0000e-005 7.1000e-0047.1000e-004 7.1000e-0047.1000e-004 0.00008.0000e-0058.0000e-005 0.0000 0.0244 0.02440.0000 8.0000e-0058.0000e-005Area 0.0461 1.7000e-004 0.0149N2O CO2eCategory tons/yrMT/yrPM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH42.2 Overall OperationalUnmitigated OperationalROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10Exhaust PM10PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5Exhaust PM2.5
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1Date: 6/16/2021 7:29 PMBeltramo Existing Uses OPS ONLY - Ventura County, AnnualEMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile0.00 0.00 0.00N20 CO2ePercent Reduction0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00PM2.5 TotalBio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4Fugitive PM10Exhaust PM10PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5Exhaust PM2.5ROG NOx CO SO288.9151 97.4137 0.5130 3.6500e-003 111.32700.0113 2.8000e-004 2.6711Total 0.0872 0.0536 0.3619 6.9000e-004 0.0663 1.3100e-0030.0677 0.0177 1.2800e-0030.0190 8.49870.0000 0.0000 0.1090 2.1949 2.30400.0000 0.0000Water0.0000 8.3896 0.4958 0.0000 20.78494.6000e-0033.0500e-003 60.2313Waste0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 8.38964.9000e-0040.0182 0.0000 59.2070 59.20706.3000e-004 0.0663 5.2000e-0040.0669 0.0177Mobile 0.0400 0.0443 0.340227.4888 27.4888 1.2700e-0033.2000e-004 27.61482.0000e-0050.0000 0.0250Energy 1.0200e-0039.1400e-003 6.7700e-0036.0000e-005 7.1000e-0047.1000e-004 7.1000e-0047.1000e-004 0.00008.0000e-0058.0000e-005 0.0000 0.0244 0.02440.0000 8.0000e-0058.0000e-005Area 0.0461 1.7000e-004 0.0149N2O CO2eCategory tons/yrMT/yrPM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4Mitigated OperationalROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10Exhaust PM10PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5Exhaust PM2.5
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1Date: 6/16/2021 7:29 PMBeltramo Existing Uses OPS ONLY - Ventura County, AnnualEMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied0.000646 0.0073040.000393 0.029232 0.000646 0.007304Single Family Housing 0.543528 0.058189 0.173108 0.133952 0.027894 0.007577 0.011427 0.006062 0.000688 0.000393 0.0292320.027894 0.007577 0.011427 0.006062 0.000688Place of Worship 0.543528 0.058189 0.173108 0.133952OBUS UBUS MCY SBUS MHMDV LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD4.4 Fleet MixLand Use LDA LDT1 LDT218.00 49.10 86 11 3Single Family Housing 10.80 7.30 7.50 32.9095.00 5.00 64 25 11Place of Worship 9.50 7.30 7.30 0.00H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW Primary Diverted Pass-byLand Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW H-W or C-W4.3 Trip Type InformationMiles Trip % Trip Purpose %51,543Total 66.28 59.93 205.54 176,153 176,153Single Family Housing 18.88 19.08 17.10 51,543Annual VMTPlace of Worship 47.40 40.85 188.44 124,610 124,610Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT4.6000e-0033.0500e-003 60.23134.2 Trip Summary InformationAverage Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated60.2313Unmitigated 0.0400 0.0443 0.3402 6.3000e-004 0.0663 5.2000e-0040.0669 0.0177 4.9000e-0040.0182 0.0000 59.2070 59.20700.0000 59.2070 59.2070 4.6000e-0033.0500e-003CO2eCategory tons/yrMT/yrMitigated 0.0400 0.0443 0.3402 6.3000e-004 0.0663 5.2000e-0040.0669 0.0177 4.9000e-0040.0182Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2OExhaust PM10PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5Exhaust PM2.5PM2.5 Total4.1 Mitigation Measures MobileROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1Date: 6/16/2021 7:29 PMBeltramo Existing Uses OPS ONLY - Ventura County, AnnualEMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied10.1060 10.1060 1.9000e-0041.9000e-004 10.16601.9000e-0041.9000e-004 10.1660NaturalGas Unmitigated1.0200e-0039.1400e-0036.7700e-003 6.0000e-005 7.1000e-0047.1000e-004 7.1000e-0047.1000e-004 0.00007.1000e-0047.1000e-004 0.0000 10.1060 10.10606.0000e-005 7.1000e-0047.1000e-004NaturalGas Mitigated1.0200e-0039.1400e-0036.7700e-00317.3828 17.3828 1.0800e-0031.3000e-004 17.44871.0800e-0031.3000e-004 17.4487Electricity Unmitigated0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 17.3828 17.38280.0000 0.0000Electricity MitigatedCH4 N2O CO2eCategory tons/yrMT/yrExhaust PM2.5PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2SO2 Fugitive PM10Exhaust PM10PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5ROG NOx CO5.0 Energy DetailHistorical Energy Use: N5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1Date: 6/16/2021 7:29 PMBeltramo Existing Uses OPS ONLY - Ventura County, AnnualEMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied10.1060 10.1060 1.9000e-004 1.9000e-00410.16605.0000e-0052.5657Total 1.0200e-0039.1400e-003 6.7700e-003 5.0000e-0057.1000e-004 7.1000e-0047.1000e-0047.1000e-004 0.00001.8000e-004 0.0000 2.5506 2.5506 5.0000e-0057.5554 1.4000e-004 1.4000e-0047.6003Single Family Housing47795.5 2.6000e-0042.2000e-003 9.4000e-004 1.0000e-0051.8000e-004 1.8000e-0041.8000e-0045.3000e-0045.3000e-004 0.0000 7.55545.8300e-003 4.0000e-0055.3000e-004 5.3000e-004Place of Worship 141583 7.6000e-0046.9400e-003CH4 N2O CO2eLand Use kBTU/yr tons/yrMT/yrExhaust PM2.5PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2MitigatedNaturalGas UseROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10Exhaust PM10PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.510.1060 10.1060 1.9000e-004 1.9000e-00410.16605.0000e-0052.5657Total 1.0200e-0039.1400e-003 6.7700e-003 5.0000e-0057.1000e-004 7.1000e-0047.1000e-0047.1000e-004 0.00001.8000e-004 0.0000 2.5506 2.5506 5.0000e-0057.5554 1.4000e-004 1.4000e-0047.6003Single Family Housing47795.5 2.6000e-0042.2000e-003 9.4000e-004 1.0000e-0051.8000e-004 1.8000e-0041.8000e-0045.3000e-0045.3000e-004 0.0000 7.55545.8300e-003 4.0000e-0055.3000e-004 5.3000e-004Place of Worship 141583 7.6000e-0046.9400e-003CH4 N2O CO2eLand Use kBTU/yr tons/yrMT/yrExhaust PM2.5PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO25.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGasUnmitigatedNaturalGas UseROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10Exhaust PM10PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1Date: 6/16/2021 7:29 PMBeltramo Existing Uses OPS ONLY - Ventura County, AnnualEMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied3.0000e-005 3.7874Total 17.3828 1.0700e-003 1.3000e-004 17.4487Single Family Housing15636.2 3.7730 2.3000e-004Land Use kWh/yrtonMT/yrPlace of Worship 56401.4 13.6098 8.4000e-004 1.0000e-004 13.6614MitigatedElectricity UseTotal CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e3.0000e-005 3.7874Total 17.3828 1.0700e-003 1.3000e-004 17.4487Single Family Housing15636.2 3.7730 2.3000e-004Land Use kWh/yrtonMT/yrPlace of Worship 56401.4 13.6098 8.4000e-004 1.0000e-004 13.66145.3 Energy by Land Use - ElectricityUnmitigatedElectricity UseTotal CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1Date: 6/16/2021 7:29 PMBeltramo Existing Uses OPS ONLY - Ventura County, AnnualEMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied2.0000e-0050.0000 0.02500.0250Unmitigated 0.0461 1.7000e-004 0.0149 0.0000 8.0000e-0058.0000e-005 8.0000e-0058.0000e-005 0.0000 0.0244 0.02440.0000 0.0244 0.0244 2.0000e-0050.0000CO2eCategory tons/yrMT/yrMitigated 0.0461 1.7000e-004 0.0149 0.0000 8.0000e-0058.0000e-005 8.0000e-0058.0000e-005Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2OExhaust PM10PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5Exhaust PM2.5PM2.5 Total6.0 Area Detail6.1 Mitigation Measures AreaROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1Date: 6/16/2021 7:29 PMBeltramo Existing Uses OPS ONLY - Ventura County, AnnualEMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied2.0000e-0050.0000 0.02508.0000e-0058.0000e-005 0.0000 0.0244 0.02440.0000 8.0000e-0058.0000e-005Total 0.0461 1.7000e-004 0.01490.0244 0.0244 2.0000e-0050.0000 0.02500.0000 0.0000 0.0000Landscaping 4.5000e-0041.7000e-004 0.0149 0.0000 8.0000e-0058.0000e-005 8.0000e-0058.0000e-005 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hearth 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000Consumer Products0.0407 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000Architectural Coating4.9900e-003CH4 N2O CO2eSubCategory tons/yrMT/yrExhaust PM2.5PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2SO2 Fugitive PM10Exhaust PM10PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5ROG NOx CO6.2 Area by SubCategoryUnmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1Date: 6/16/2021 7:29 PMBeltramo Existing Uses OPS ONLY - Ventura County, AnnualEMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied2.6711Unmitigated 2.3040 0.0113 2.8000e-004CO2eCategorytonMT/yrMitigated 2.3040 0.0113 2.8000e-0042.6711Total CO2 CH4 N2O2.0000e-0050.0000 0.02507.0 Water Detail7.1 Mitigation Measures Water8.0000e-0058.0000e-005 0.0000 0.0244 0.02440.0000 8.0000e-0058.0000e-005Total 0.0461 1.7000e-004 0.01490.0244 0.0244 2.0000e-0050.0000 0.02500.0000 0.0000 0.0000Landscaping 4.5000e-0041.7000e-004 0.0149 0.0000 8.0000e-0058.0000e-005 8.0000e-0058.0000e-005 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hearth 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000Consumer Products0.0407 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000Architectural Coating4.9900e-003CH4 N2O CO2eSubCategory tons/yrMT/yrExhaust PM2.5PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2SO2 Fugitive PM10Exhaust PM10PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5ROG NOx COMitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1Date: 6/16/2021 7:29 PMBeltramo Existing Uses OPS ONLY - Ventura County, AnnualEMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied1.0000e-004 0.8094Total 2.3040 0.0113 2.8000e-004 2.6711Single Family Housing0.130308 / 0.08215070.6710 4.2900e-003Land Use MgaltonMT/yrPlace of Worship 0.21339 / 0.3337641.6330 7.0500e-003 1.8000e-004 1.8616MitigatedIndoor/Outdoor UseTotal CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e1.0000e-004 0.8094Total 2.3040 0.0113 2.8000e-004 2.6711Single Family Housing0.130308 / 0.08215070.6710 4.2900e-003Land Use MgaltonMT/yrPlace of Worship 0.21339 / 0.3337641.6330 7.0500e-003 1.8000e-004 1.86167.2 Water by Land UseUnmitigatedIndoor/Outdoor UseTotal CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1Date: 6/16/2021 7:29 PMBeltramo Existing Uses OPS ONLY - Ventura County, AnnualEMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied0.0000 1.2371Total 8.3896 0.4958 0.0000 20.7849Single Family Housing2.46 0.4994 0.0295Land Use tonstonMT/yrPlace of Worship 38.87 7.8903 0.4663 0.0000 19.547820.78498.2 Waste by Land UseUnmitigatedWaste DisposedTotal CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Unmitigated 8.3896 0.4958 0.0000tonMT/yr Mitigated 8.3896 0.4958 0.0000 20.78498.0 Waste Detail8.1 Mitigation Measures WasteCategory/YearTotal CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1Date: 6/16/2021 7:29 PMBeltramo Existing Uses OPS ONLY - Ventura County, AnnualEMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule AppliedHorse Power Load Factor Fuel Type9.0 Operational OffroadEquipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year0.0000 1.2371Total 8.3896 0.4958 0.0000 20.7849Single Family Housing2.46 0.4994 0.0295Land Use tonstonMT/yrPlace of Worship 38.87 7.8903 0.4663 0.0000 19.5478MitigatedWaste DisposedTotal CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1Date: 6/16/2021 7:29 PMBeltramo Existing Uses OPS ONLY - Ventura County, AnnualEMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule AppliedUser Defined EquipmentEquipment Type Number11.0 VegetationLoad Factor Fuel TypeBoilersEquipment Type Number Heat Input/Day Heat Input/Year Boiler Rating Fuel TypeEquipment Type Number Hours/Day Hours/Year Horse Power10.0 Stationary EquipmentFire Pumps and Emergency Generators
APPENDIX C
Emissions Reduction and Dust Control BMP Measures
Beltramo Residential Project Appendix C: BMPs
Air Quality and Global Climate Change Analysis
APPENDIX C: EMISSIONS REDUCTION AND DUST CONTROL
BMP MEASURES
(1) Per VCAPCD recommendations, in order to reduce impacts associated with NOx emissions (a
precursor to ozone) to the extent feasible, the following measures shall be implemented:
a. All commercial on-road and off-road diesel vehicles are subject to the idling limits of
California Code of Regulations Title 13, Sections 2485 and 2449(d)(3), respectively.
Construction equipment shall not idle for more than five consecutive minutes. The idling
limit does not apply to: 1) idling when queuing; 2) idling to verify that the vehicle is in
safe operating condition; (3), idling for testing, servicing, repairing, or diagnostic
purposes; 4) idling necessary to accomplish work for which the vehicle was designed
(such as operating a crane); 5) idling required to bring the machine system to operating
temperature, and 6) idling necessary to ensure safe operation of the vehicle.
b. Idling Equipment engines should be maintained in good condition and in proper tune, as
per manufacturer’s specifications.
c. During the smog season (May through October), the construction period should be
lengthened so as to minimize the number of vehicles and equipment operating at the
same time.
d. Alternatively fueled construction equipment, such as compressed natural gas, liquefied
natural gas, or electric, should be used if feasible.
(2) Per VCAPCD recommendations, during clearing, grading, earth moving, or excavation operations,
excessive fugitive dust emissions shall be controlled by regular watering, or other dust preventive
measures using the following procedures:
a. All material excavated or graded shall be sufficiently watered to prevent excessive
amounts of dust. Watering shall occur at least twice daily with complete coverage,
preferably in the late morning and after work is done for the day, so that water
penetrates sufficiently to minimize fugitive dust during grading activities.
b. All graded and excavated material, exposed soil areas, and active portions of the
construction site, including unpaved roadways on-site, should be treated to prevent
fugitive dust. Measures may include watering, application of environmentally-safe soil
stabilization materials, and/or roll-compaction as appropriate.
c. Graded and/or excavated inactive areas of the construction site should be monitored at
least weekly for dust stabilization. If a portion of the site is inactive for over four days,
soil on-site should be stabilized.
d. Signs should be posted limiting on-site traffic to 15 miles per hour.
e. All clearing, grading, earth moving, or excavation activities shall cease during periods of
high winds (i.e., greater than 20 miles per hour averaged over one hour) so as to
prevent excessive amounts of dust.
Complete Administrative Draft City of Moorpark August 2021
Beltramo Residential Project Appendix C: BMPs
Air Quality and Global Climate Change Analysis
94
f.All material transported off-site shall be either sufficiently watered or securely covered to prevent excessive amounts of
dust pursuant to California Vehicle Code §23114.
g.Respiratory protection shall be used by all employees as needed, in accordance with California Division of
Occupational Safety and Health regulations.
h.It is not anticipated that the Project site poses a risk for Valley Fever. Measures to reduce exposure to the fungus that
causes Valley Fever can be found in the 2003 VCAPCD Ventura County Air Quality Assessment Guidelines, Section
7.4.2.
(3)Per VCAPCD recommendations, after clearing, grading, earth moving, or excavation operations, and
during construction activities, fugitive dust emissions shall be controlled using the following
procedures:
a.All inactive portions of the construction site shall be seeded and watered until grass
cover is grown.
b.All active portions of the construction site shall be sufficiently watered to prevent
excessive amounts of dust.
(4)Per VCAPCD recommendations, fugitive dust emissions shall be controlled by assuring that streets
adjacent to the project site shall be swept as needed to remove silt, which may be accumulated
from construction activities so as to prevent excessive amounts of dust.
(5)Per VCAPCD recommendations, off-road construction equipment shall be minimum Tier 3 EPA
rating for diesel engines or Tier 4, if commercially available to reduce ozone precursor emissions.
APPENDIX I – Traffic Report (Updated)