The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutAGENDA REPORT 1988 0413 CC ADJ ITEM 09BITEM c;,g, CITY OF MOORPARK Q 1 CITY COUNCIL MEMORANDUM SECTION I: GENERAL INFORMATION A. HEARING DATE: B. HEARING TIME: April 6, 1988 7:00 p.m. C. HEARING LOCATION: City Council Chamber, City Hall 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark, California G. REQUESTED ACTION: 0. CASE NO.: OP-393 -396 E. STAFF CONTACT: Duane Morita, Sanchez Talarico Assoc._, Inc . . , F. APPLICANT: c/o Moorpark -Los Angeles Siegel & Associates, Inc. 5101 Douglas Fir Road Calabasas, CA. 91302 1. conduct the public hearings on the entitlement requests. 2. Approve the Mitigated Negative Declaration for OP-393 -396. 3. Direct staff to prepare appropriate resolution(s) r·egarding the Council's ultimate decision on the requested entitlements. H. PROJECT SUMM.ARY/LOCATION: The application will allow construction of four separate industriai structures on a rectangular shaped vacant parcel of land approximately 224,770 sq. ft. (5. 1 acres) in size. Total building area is 105, 108 sq. ft. to be used for office, warehouse, and manufacturing activities in the following breakdown 11,676 sq. ft. of office; 31,482 sq. ft. of warehouse; and 61,950 sq. ft. of manufacturing. The location of the project area is shown on page 1 of the Planning Commission Staff Report. The :;taff rep0rt is included as Attachment A of this memorandum. I. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTIONS The Planr.ir.g Commission he!d a public hearing 2nd on February 1, 2nd March 7, ~~38 ~o consi.1Pr OP-393 -396. At it's meeting of March 21, 1988, the Planning ~•J'u,1111;.::>lVll < .. n ...... ,__,·r~"-..•_;._: ''--..-..!.,-+--,_,.-. ;'~.-,~-r:;_:: ~~ :~= ,.___,,._: .......,.,...._ nn "lf"r' ••. l_:~L -....... --.. ..... ,...._,,.,.....,-1 the Mitigated Negative Declaration and DP-3~3 -396, ,·espectiveiy. At the Planing Commission hearing of March 7, 1988 the applicant transmitted a letter to the Commission (see attachment B) requesting modifications to seven (7) different conditions that appear throughout the tentative parcel map and development plan permits. , l'JH:cr-1 nr>,Q':l.D/PC/\CFND/\ March 31, 1988 The Commission agreed with Mr. Brown on the following items: 02 Letter Item No. 1 Pertained to construction of "C" and "D" streets. This condition required the streets to be constructed prior to the zone clearance of 25% of the total development land within LDM-10 or by July 1, 1989, which ever occurs first. The Commission concurred with the applicant to change to "prior to occupancy". Letter Item No. 2 & 3 Pertain to landscape and lighting plans and when a grading plan is to be issued. Letter Item No. 4 The Commission approved the color and material selection at their March 7th meeting. Letter Item No. 5 Regarding meandering sidewalk on Los Angeles Avenue was deferred to an agreement so as to provide that one year form time zone clearance is issued or prior to any occupancy the sidewalk must be installed. Letter I tern 6 Pertain to when the traffic signal should be installed and when warrant studies are to be accomp!ished. The Commission amended Condition No. 82 of DP-393 -396 and Condition No. 45 of LDM-10 and condition No. 87 of DP-397-404 so as to increase the applicant's deposit from $65,000 to $70,000 plus the cost of signal warrants as determined by the City Engineer. Letter Item 7 The Commission did not support a modification regarding a covenant to support future traffic mitigation fees. The Commission moved to recommend approval to the City Council subject to the The Commission agreed with the applicant to change from prior to zone clearance to prior to building permit issued on a number of conditions. If these conditions remain as written then the applicant will only submit certain plans at zone clearance with approvals at time of building permits issued. This change on timing may establish a precedent in the future and should be considered carefully by the Council. Attachments: A. Planning Commission Resolutions B. Nicholas M. Brown, applicant, lette:· dated 3/7/88 C. Planning Commission Staff Report PJR:crl np~q~n/PrAr.FNnA CITY OF MOORPARK CITY COUNCIL MEMORANDUM SECTION I: GENERAL INFORMATION . ·,. A. HEARING DATE: April 6, 1988 7:00 p.m. D. CASE NO.: LDM-10 & DP-397 -404 B. HEARING TIME: C. HEARING LOCATION: City Council Chamber, City Hall 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark, California G. REQUESTED ACTION: E. STAFF CONTACT: Duane Morita, Sanchez Talarico Assoc., Inc. F. APPLICANT: c/o Moorpark -Los Angeles Siegel & Associates, Inc. 5101 Douglas Fir Road Calabasas, CA. 91302 1. conduct the public hearings on the entitlement requests. 2. Approve the Mitigated Negative Declaration for LDM-10 & DP-397 -404. 3. Direct staff to prepare appropriate resolution(s) regarding the Council's ultimate decision on the requested entitlements. H. PROJECT SUMMARY /LOCATION: The proposed project contains twenty-six (26) lots ( LDM-10) and the eight (8) separate industrial structures (DP-397 -404). They are located on the eastside of Maureen Lane north of LosAngeles Avneue. The location of the project area is shown on page 1 of the Planning Commision Staff Report. The staff report is included as Attachment A of this memorandum. LDM-10 and DP-397 -404 are located on a rectangular shaped vacant parcel of land. LDM-10 would be comprised of 12. 4 acres. DP-397 -404 would encompass 102,741 sq. ft. of toatl land area or 2.36 acres. The total building area of 45,805 sq.ft. (1.05) acres). DP-397 -404 will provide a total of 91 parking spaces and 18,908 sq.ft. of iandscaping. I. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTIONS The Planning Commission held a public hearing and on February 1, and March 7, 1988 to consider LDM-10 & DP-397 -404. At it's meeting of March 21, 1988, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution Nos. PC-88-167, PC-88-168, PC-88-169 amd PC-88-170 which approved the Mitigated Negative Declaration and DP-393 - 396, respectively. At the Planing Commission hearing of March 7, 1988 the applicant transmitted a letter to the Commission (see attachment B) requesting modifications to seven (7) different conditions that appear throughout the tentative parcel map and development plan permits. March 31, 1988 d The Commission agreed with Mr. Brown on the following items: Letter Item No. 1 Pertained to construction of "C" and "D" streets. This condition required the streets to be constructed prior to the zone clearance of 25% of the total development land within LDM-10 or by July 1, 1989, which ever occurs first. The Commission concurred with the applicant to change to "prior to occupancy''. Letter Item No. 2 & 3 Pertain to landscape and lighting plans and when a grading plan is to be issued. Letter Item No. 4 The Commission approved the color and material selection at their March 7th meeting. Letter Item No. 5 Regarding meandering sidewalk on Los Angeles Avenue was deferred to an agreement so as to provide that one year form time zone clearance is issued or prior to any occupancy the sidewalk must be installed. Letter I tern 6 Pertain to when the traffic signal should be installed and when warrant studies are to be accompiished. The Commission amended Condition No. 82 of DP-393 -396 and Condition No. 45 of LDM-10 and condition No. 87 of DP-397-404 so as to increase the applicant's deposit from $65,000 to $70,000 plus the cost of signal warrants as determined by the City Engineer. Lette:--Item 7 The Commission did not support a modification regarding a covenant to support future traffic mitigation fees. The Commission moved to recommend approval to the City Council subject to the aoove modifications. The Commission agreed with the applicant to change from prior to zone clearance to prior to building permit issued on a number of conditions. If these conditions remain as written then the applicant will only submit certain plans at zone clearance with approvals at time of building permits issued. This change on timing may establish a precedent in the future and should be considered carefully by the Council. Attachments: A. Planning Commission Resolutions 8. Nicholas M. Brcwn, -applicant, leti:er dated 3/7/88 C. Planning Commission Staff Report PJR:crl .&.:' ~;?'.:°t: WEST AMERICA CONSTRUCTION CORP ~~~ -'>,L;.,.~~--:~-'.--~ ... -._ .• ---8uildarJ and Land 01velop1rJ------::e-,.=-.,.-w-,,-:-.M-,-At_•_w_c_ .. ,-u-,r-c-,.-o-c-, ;_•c;_v.:.c.::.A,...;:V...;:M...;:i....;:,-,.;_c::A,:. ,.:.:.0.:.:.2" March 7, 1988 City of Moorpark Planning Commission 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark, CA 93021 To the Members of the Planning Commission: lllJ1 O&l•&aee CON'(AACTO'llt ~ICCNSC Gaeo~ Below please find several proposed revisions as well. as a few quest:ions regarding our Conditions of Approval for LDM-10; DP-393-396 and DP-397- 40i1, l) LDM-10; Condition No. 30, Page 24 DP397-404; Condition No. 55, Page 41, "C" Street and "D" Avenue are to be completely constructed prior to zone clearance of 25% of the total developable land area within LDM-10, or by July l, 1989, whichever occurs first, Regardless of the above time limits, "C" Street and "D" Avenue are to be completed prior to zoning clearance of any lot taking access to "D" Avenue or "C" Street, or prior to completion of Maureen Lane Signal," PROPOSED REVISION: • 1 ~ Change the words "zoning clearance" in ths:: fifth sentence abcve to "occupancy." 2) DP397-404; Conditions Nos. 11, 21, and 22; Pages 33 and 34 DP393-396; Conditions Nos, 12, 22, and 23; Pages 18 and 19 -"That prior to the issuance of a zone clearance, a landscaping anc planting plan (3 sets), together with specifications and maintenance program, prepared by a State licensed landscape architect in accordance with County Guidelines for Landscape Plcm Check, shall be submitted to the Director of Community Development for review and approval. The ·applicant shall· benr the total cost of such review and of final installation inspection, The landscaping and planting plan shall be accoripa- nfod by a fee spec:ified by the City of Moorpark, All landscaping and planting shall be accomplished and approved by the Director of Community Development prior to the issuance of any occupancy pe::-mit for DP-397-•404." • -"Pi:ior to issuancu of a zoning clearance, the final working drawings shall be submitted to the Director of Community 'Development for review and approval," -"F,:,r all exterior lighting, a lighting pl.an shall be prepareri by an electrical engineer registered in the State of California and • submitted to the Department of Community Development for review and approval prior to the issuance of a :rnne clearance, The lighting plan shall achieve the following objectives: ii.void ir,terf erence with reasonable use of adjoining properties; mini- mize to the greatest extent possible on-site glare; provide adequate on-site lighting; limit electroliers height to ,avoid e>:cessive illumination; provide lighting structures which are compatible with the total design of the proposed facility." PROPOSED REVISION: Change wording of each of the above con,ditions to read that prior to the issuance of a zoning clearance, the applicant shall submit plans (i.ncluding landscaping, working drawings, lighting, etc,) to the Director of Community Development, along with any plan check fee, if required, for review. All submitted plans are to be plan ..-checked and approved prior to the issuance of a building permit, D5 3) DP397~404; Conditions Nos, 41,42,43, and 47; Pages 38 and 39 DP393-396; Conditions Nos, 45,46,47, and 50; Pages 24 and 25. -"Thf:: applicant shall submit to the City of Moc>rpark for review and approval, a grading plan prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer; shall obtain a Grading Permit; and shall post sufficient surety guaranteeing completion." -"The applicant shall submit to the City of Moorpark for. review and approval, a detailed So~ls Report certified by o registered professional Civil Engineer in the State of California, The grading plan shall incorporate the *-sHci~BO~ations of the approved Soils Report, 11 -"The applicant shall submit to the City of Moorpark for review and approval, drainage plans, hydrologic, and hydraulic calculations prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer; shall enter into an agreement with the City of Moorpark to complete the improvement and e,hall post sufficient surety guaranteeing the construction of the improvements, The drainage plans and calculations shall indicate the following conditions before and after development," PROPOSED REVISION: Change wording of each of the above conditions to read that --~ ·prior to the issuance of a zoning clearance, the applicant shall submit plans (including grading, soil reports, street improvement, drainage, hydrologic, hydraulic, etc.) to the City of Moorpark, along with any plan check fee, if required, for review, All submitted plans are to be plan check and approved prior to the issuance of a building permit. 4) DP397-4C4; Condition No, 26, Page 35 DP393-396; Condition No. 28, Page 20, "That the final design of site improvements for each project, including materials and colors, is subject to the approval of the Planning Commi.ssion." QUESTION: Will this conditic>n be aproved at this meeting? If so, can it be eliminated from these conditions? 5) DP393-396; Condition No. 29, Page 21 "That the applicant shall provide a five (5) foot wide mean- dering sidewalk along Los Angeles Avenue and shall provide land- scaping and trees along Los Angeles Avenue 'to the satisfaction of the Director of Community Development," PROPOSED REVISION: _ _,. This condition should be prior to occupancy in lieu of prior tc, zone clearance, 6) LDM-10; Condition No. 31, Page 24 DP397-404; Condition No, 56, Page 41, "To assist the City Engineer in determining when a traffic signal should be installed at the intersection of Los ~ngeles Avenue with Maureen Lane, the developer shall conduct manual turning counts from 6:00 a.m. to 7:00 p,m, prior to the issu- ance of zone clearance for Development Projects corresponding to 40%, 65%, and 90% of the developable portion of the parent parcel, If this information is provided by other sources , (City, Caltrans, or other developments) to •the City Engineer s satisfaction, part or all of this condition may be waived by the City Engineer." ------*-Condition No, 43 was inadvertently omitted from Paragraph 3 -this paragraph should be incorporated with 3 above, as follows: "The applican shall submit to the City of Moorpark fqr revie\ol and approval, street improvement plans prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer; shall enter into an agreement with the City of Moorpark to complete the improvements; and shall post sufficient suret~· gullr::intNdng thE:' construction of the improvements," Ob '""ca.uu•ub ...,...., .. "' .. _.,...,.. __ ., Page 3, March 7, 1988 QUESTION: Can this condition be waived or eliminated in lieu of the • fact that the applicant shall pay a $65,000,00 supplementary • contribution for the construction of the traffic signal at Maureen Lane and Lc,s Angeles Avenue as referred to in the Conditions No, 45 (LDM-10), //87 DP397-404), and No, 82 (DP393-396), and revised in the new Additional Conditions of Approval? ; Caltrans will determine when a signal is warranted at this intersection, The applicant shall have no further liability or responsibility ussociated with this signal, 7) DP397-404; Conditions Nos,25 and 50; Pages 35 and 40 respectively DP393-397; Conditions Nos.25 and 50(i); Pages 20 and 26 respectively. "Tha applicant shall execute a covenant running with the land on behalf of itself and its successors, heirs, and assigns agreeing to participate in the formation of an assessment di~trict or other financing technique including, but not limited to, the payment of traffic mitigation fees, which· the City may implement or adopt, to fund public street and traffic improvements directly or indirectly affected by the development." PROPOSED REVISION: We feel this paragraph should be re-written to incorporate the need for a more defined and realistic time and dollar limit, The paragraph as it stands now is too vague and open-ended, Thank you for your consideration of the above. Very truly yours, WEST AMERICA CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION Nicholas M, Brown Applicant mw I RESOLUTION NO. PC-88-165 A RESOLUTION OF THE MOORPARK PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVE THE MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION REGARDING DP-393 -396 ON THE APPLICATIONS OF SIEGEL & ASSOCIATES, INC. oe WHEREAS, at a duly noticed public hearing on February 1, 1988 , the Planning Commission considered applications filed by Siegel & Associates, Inc. requesting approval to construct four industrial facilities of 105,108 square feet total located on the westside of Maureen Lane north of Los Angeles A venue (Assessor Parcel Nos. 511-062-04, 511-062-05, and 511-062-06). WHEREAS, the Planning Commission after review and consideration of the infor- mation contained in the staff report dated March 7, 1988 and the Mitigated Negative Declaration, has found that these facilities will not have a significant effect on the environment; and has reached its decision in the matter; WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has held a public hearing on the recommen- dation to City Council for approval of the Mitigated Negative Declaration; WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed all environmental documenta- tion prepared to evaluate the proposed project; NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA, DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I. Pursuant to the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (Division 13 of the Public Resources Code of the State of California (beginning at Section 21000) the Planning Commission of the City of Moorpark recommends that the City Council approve the Mitigated Negative Declaration. SECTION 2. That the findings contained in Section IV of this staff report dated March 7, 1988 , which report is incorpurat6d t:r-;:2.fo;:.:;-;~::: ~~ though fully set forth herein with conditions as modified by said Commission, are hereby recommended by the City Council for approval; SECTION 3. That at its meeting of March 7, 1988 , the Planning Commission took action to direct staff to prepare a Resolution with attached staff recommended conditions, as modified, to recommended that the City Council accept the Mitigated Negative Declaration; recommend that the City Council certify that the informa- tion was considered on decisions related to the project; and, recommend that the City Council approve the Mitigated Negative Declaration said Resolution to be presented for Consent Calendar action at the next regular scheduled meeting. The action with the foregoing direction was approved by the following roll call vote; AYES: Commissioners Holland, Montgomery, Butcher, Wozniak and Lawrason; NOES: None; ABSENT: None; PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS ___ 2/2'----~--, ATTEST: Acting Secretary APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: cards, Director of velopment I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing resolution was duly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Moorpark, California, at a regular meeting held on the 21st day of March 1988, roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: ATTEST: Commissioners Montgomery, Wozniak, Butcher, Holland, and Lawrason; None; None; None. ~~ Celia LaFleur, Secretary RESOLUTION NO. PC-88-166 A RESOLUTION OF THE MOORPARK PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA APPROVING DP-393 -396 ON THE APPLICATION OF SIEGEL & ASSOCIATES, INC. WHEREAS, at a duly noticed public hearing on February 1, 1988 the Planning Commission considered applications filed by Siegel & Associates, Inc. requesting approval to construct four industrial facilities of 105,108 square feet and located on the westside of Maureen Lane north of Los Angeles Avenue (Assessor Parcel Nos. 511-062-04, 511-062-05, and 511-062-06). WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, after review and consideration of the infor- mation contained in the staff report dated Ma re h 7, 1988 and the Mitigated Negative Declaration, has found that these projects will not have a significant effect on the environment; and has reached its decision in the matter; WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has held a public hearing on the adoption of such development plans, and; WHEREAS, the Planning Commission does hereby FIND that the adoption of such development plans is consistent with the City's General Plan; NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA, DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION l. Pursuant to the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (Division 13) of the Public Resources Code of the State of California (beginning at Section 21000) the Planning Commission of the City of Moorpark recommends that the City Council approve Development Plan Permits Nos. 393-396. SECTION 2. That the findings contained in Section IV of this staff report dated March 7 1988 , wh1ct1 report is incorpurai..:J u.7 ,cr'ecc, i;;,,:: ::; though fully set forth herein with conditions as modified by said Commission, are hereby recommended by the City Council for approval; SECTION 3. That at its meeting of March 7, 1988 , the Planning Commission took action to direct staff to prepare a Resolution with attached staff recommended conditions, as modified, to recommended that the City Council approve Development Plan Permits Nos. 393-396. Said Resolution to be presented for Consent Calendar action at the next regular scheduled meeting. The action with the foregoing direction was approved by the following roll call vote; A YES: Cammi ss i one rs Ho 11 and, Montgomery, Butcher, Wozniak and Lawrason; NOES: None; ABSENT: None; PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS __ 2/ __ Jr __ ATTEST: /~. c/' X/:7 ~c;:/?£J~;. Acting Secretary APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: cards, Director of velopment I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing resolution was duly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Moorpark, California, at a regular meeting held on the 21st day of March 1988, roll call vote: \ l AYES: NOES: Commissioners Montgomery, Wozniak, Butcher, Holland, and Lawrason; None; ABSENT: None; ABSTAIN: None. ATTEST: ~·d~-L/ Celia LaFleur, Secretary DEVELOPMENT PLAN PERMIT NO.: APPLICANT: DATE: DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CONDITIONS GENERAL REQUIREMENTS: DP-393 -396 DP-393 -396 Siegel & Associates, Inc. February l, 1988 1. That permits are granted for the land and projects on the submitted plot plans and elevations. That the location and design of all site improvements shall be as shown on the approved plot plans and elevations. 2. That unless the projects are inaugurated (building foundation slab in place and substantial work in progress) not later than one (1) year after these permits are granted, these permits shall automatically expire on that date. The Director of Community Development may, at his discretion, grant up to one (1) additional year extension from project inauguration if there have been no changes in the adjacent areas and if permittee can document that he has diligently worked toward inauguration or projects during the initial one-year period. 3. That any minor changes may be approved by the Director of Community Develop- ment upon the filing of a Minor Modification application, and the passing before the Planning Commission prior to the appeal period ending. Any Major Modifica- tion is to be approved by the City Council. 4. That the design, maintenance and operation of the permit areas and facilities thereon shall comply with all applicable requirements and enactments of Federal, State, and County and City authorities, and all such requirements and enactments shall, by reference, become conditions of these permits. 5. That no conditions of these entitlements shall be interpreted as permitting or requiring any violation of law or any unlawful rules or regulations or orders of an authorized governmental agency. In instances where more than one set of rules apply, the stricter ones shall take precedence. 6. That if any of the conditions or limitations of these development plans are held to be invalid, that holding shall not invalidate any of the remaining conditions or limitations set forth. 7. That the permittees agree as a condition of issuance and use of these permits to def end, at his sole expense, any action brought against the City because of issuance (or renewal) of these permits or in the alternative to relinquish these permits. Permittees will reimburse the City for any court cost which the City may be required by court to pay as a result of any such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate in the defense of any such action, but such participation shall not relieve permittees of his obligation under this condition. 17 \L DEVELOPMENT PLAN PERMIT NO.: DP-393 -396 DP-393 -396 Siegel & Associates, Inc. APPLICANT: DATE: February 1, 1988 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CONDITIONS (Cont'd.) 8. That pennittees' acceptance of these permits and/or operation under these permits shall be deemed to be acceptance by permittee of all conditions of these permits. 9. That the developments are subject to all applicable regulations of the (Limited Industrial} zone and all agencies of the State of California, County of Ventura, City of Moorpark, and any other governmental entities. PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A ZONING CLEARANCE, THE FOLLOWING CONDI- TIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED: 10. 13. 14. 15. 16. That the applicant will apply for a lot line adjustment prior to zone clearance to consolidate lots 24 and 25 into one lot. That prior to construction for each project, a zone clearance shall be obtained from the Department of Community Development and a building permit shall be obtained for each project from the Building and Safety Division. That prior to the issuance of a zone clearance, a landscaping and planting plan (3 sets}, together with specifications and maintenance program, prepared by a State licensed landscape architect in accordance with County Guidelines for Landscape Plan Check, shall be submitted to the Director of Community Development for review. The applicant shall bear the total cost of such review and of final installation inspection. The landscaping and planting plan shall be accompanied by a fee specified by the City of Moorpark. All landscaping and planting shall be accomplished and approved by the Director of Community Development prior to the issuance of any occupancy permit for DP-393 -396. That the final landscape plans for each project shall provide for a 50% shade coverage within all parking areas. Shade coverage is described as the maximum mid-day :sha<lt:u a•--=-"-.--!.=-!",.,.=-.--! t:;,-~ :;:;::!:~!~;:! ~:--0 ~: ..... .," t.-0 .. M "00.4, mM11ritv_ Landscaping and irrigation shall be provided to the curb adjacent. That all turf plantings associated with these projects shall be drought tolerant, low-water using variety. Plantings in and adjacent to parking in vehicular area shall be contained within raised planters surrounded by 6" high concrete curbs. Landscaping shall not obscure any exterior door or window from street view. Landscaping at entrances/exits or at any intersection within the parking lot shall not block or screen the view of a seated driver from another moving vehicle or pedestrian. 18 DEVELOPMENT PLAN PERMIT NO.: DP-393 -396 DP-393 -396 Siegel & Associates, Inc. APPLICANT: DATE: February 1, 1988 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CONDITIONS (Cont'd.) 17. Landscaping (trees) shall not be placed directly under any overhead lighting which could cause a loss of light at ground level. 18. That all roof mounted equipment (vents, stacks, blowers, air conditioning equipment) that may extend above any parapet wall shall be enclosed on all four sides by view obscuring material. Prior to the issuance of a zone clearance, the final design of the roof screening and location of any roof mounted equipment of the projects must be approved by the Director of Community Development. 19. That all trash disposal areas shall be provided in a location which will not interfere with circulation, parking or access to the building and shall be screened with a six-(6) foot high, solid wall enclosure with metal gates, final design of said enclosure shall be subject to the approval of the Director of Community Develop- ment prior to the issuance of zone clearance. 20. That signs are subject to the Moorpark Code, Chapter 50, Title 9, Sign Ordinance. A sign permit is required. No building signs of any type shall be allowed on any building wall or window. Only a monument sign shall be permitted for these development plan and shall not exceed 30 square feet, no higher than 5 feet above average ground level. A sign program shall be submitted and approved by the Director of Community Development for all signage. 21. Roof design and construction for each project shall include a mm1mum 18" (inch) extension of the parapet wall above the highest point of the roof. -22. • 23. Prior to issuance of a zoning clearance, the final working drawings shall be submitted to the Director of Community Development for review . For all exterior lighting, a lighting plan shall be prepared by an electrical en.gin~~~ r~gistcred ;~ t~~ s~~~~ cf C~!!f ~!"~!~ ~!!d ~~b~~t~~~ t0 thP T)p!'~rtmP.nt of Community Development for review prior to the issuance of a zone clearance. The lighting plan shall achieve the following objectives: A void interference with reasonable use of adjoining properties; minimize to the greatest extent possible on-site glare; provide adequate on-site lighting; limit electroliers height to avoid excessive illumination; provide lighting structures which are compatible with the total design of the proposed facility. 19 DEVELOPMENT PLAN PERMIT NO.: DP-393 -396 DP-393 -396 Siegel & Associates, Inc. APPLICANT: DATE: February 1, 1988 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CONDITIONS (Cont'd.) These plans include the following: a. A photometric plan showing a point by point foot candle layout to extend a minimum twenty-(20) feet outside the property lines. Layout plan to be based on a ten-(10) foot grid center. b. Maximum overall height of pole fixtures shall be not more than fourteen (14) feet. Existing pole fixtures shall be reduced to fourteen (14) feet. c. Fixtures must have sharp cut-off qualities at property lines. d. There shall be no more than a seven to one (7: 1) ratio of level of illumination shown. (Maximum to minimum ratio between Lighting Standards.) e. Low pressure energy efficient light fixtures shall be used. f. Average maximum of one-half candie iliumination. 24. Pullover parking (overhangs) shall be limited to 24 inches maximum. 25. Prior to the issuance of a zone clearance for each project the developer shall show evidence of a recorded covenant to hold as a single parcel lots 24 and 25 of Ventura County Assessors Office Book 511, page 62. 26. That the applicant shall construct a utility room with common access to house all meters. No exterior ladders shall be permitted. 27. The applicant shall, prior to the issuance of a zone clearance for each project, heirs and assigns agreeing to participate in the formation of and be subject to any assessment district or other financing technique including but not limited to the payment of traffic mitigation fees, which the City may implement or adopt, to fund public street and traffic improvements directly or indirectly affected by the development. Traffic mitigation fees shall be used for projects such as, but not limited to, the extension of New Los Angeles A venue. e 28. (Deleted) 20 \5 DEVELOPMENT PLAN PERMIT NO.: APPLICANT: DATE: DP-393 -396 DP-393 -396 Siegel & Associates, Inc. February 1, 1988 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CONDITIONS (Cont'd.) 29. That the applicant shall provide a five (5) foot wide meandering sidewalk along Los Angeles Area and shall provide landscaping and trees along Los Angeles A venue to the satisfaction of the Director of Community Development. 30. Prior to zone clearance the applicant shall have approval of the Director of Community Development to provide skylights that are as opaque as feasible to minimize potential evening illumination as viewed from the exterior. 31. That no asbestos pipe or construction materials shall be used for the projects entitlement without prior approval of the City Council. PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A BUILDING PERMIT, THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED: 32. That prior to the issuance of a building permit the developer shall pay all school assessment fees levied by the Moorpark Unified School District. 33. An "Unconditional Will Serve" letter for water and sewer service shall be obtained from Ventura County Waterworks District No. I or that the applicant shall have satisfied all requirements of the Ventura County Waterworks District No. 1 for annexation and will be provided with both water and sewer of provided temporary water service from Camrosa Water District to the satisfaction of the County Water Works District. -33A. Items required to be submitted in Condition Nos. 12, 22, and 23 shall be approved. DURING CONSTRUCTION, THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED: 34. That all utilities shall be underground to the nearest off-site utility pole except through transmission lines. 35. That all parking shall be surfaced with asphalt or concrete and shall include adequate provisions for drainage, striping and appropriate wheel blocks or curbs in parking areas. 36. That at the time water service connectioa is made for each project, cross connection control devices shall be installed on the water system in accordance with the requirements of the Ventura County Environmental Health Department. 21 DEVELOPMENT PLAN PERMIT NO.: APPLICANT: DATE: DP-393 -396 DP-393 -396 Siegel & Associates, Inc. February 1, 1988 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CONDITIONS (Cont'd.) PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY, THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED: 37. That prior to the occupancy or change of occupancy or introduction of an additional occupancy of these buildings by the tenants, either the owner or prospective tenant shall apply for the use of these buildings. The purpose of the zoning clearance shall determine if the proposed uses are compatible with the existing zoning and terms and conditions of these permits. 38. That no later than ten (10) days after any change of property owner or of lessee(s) or· operator(s) of the subject uses, there shall be filed with the Director of Community Development the name(s) and address(es) of the new owner(s) lessee(s) or operator(s), together with a letter from any such person(s), acknowledging and agreeing to comply with all conditions of these permits prior to zone clearance. 39. Prior to occupancy by any tenant or subsequent owner that would employ or dispose of hazardous waste or materials, a Major Modification shall be processed and filed. 40. All roof top mechanical equipment and other noise generation sources onsite be attenuated to 55 dBA at the property line. That prior to the issuance of the certificate of occupancy the applicant shall submit a report to demonstrate to the satisfaction of the Director of Community Development that all onsite noise generation sources h2ve been mitigated to this level. The report shall be prepared by a licensed acoustical engineer in accordance with accepted engineering standards. AFTER ISSUANCE OF A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY, THE FOLLOWING CON- 41. That the continued maintenance of the permit area and facilities shall be subject to periodic inspection by the City. The permittee shall be required to remedy any defects in ground maintenance, as indicated by Code Enforcement Officer within thirty (30) days after notification. 42. No outside storage of any materials or overnight simi-trucks or truck trailers, beyond the loading bays, of any kind shall be permitted after occupancy. 22 \l DEVELOPMENT PLAN PERMIT NO.: APPLICANT: DATE: DP-393 -396 DP-393 -396 Siegel & Associates, Inc. February 1, 1988 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CONDITIONS (Cont'd.) 43. No repair or maintenance of trucks or any vehicle shall occur on the subject site. 44. Loading and unloading operations shall not be conducted between the hours of 10:00 p.m. and 6:00 a.m. 23 DEVELOPMENT PLAN PERMIT NO.: DP-393 -396 DP-393 -396 Siegel & Associates, Inc. APPLICANT: DATE: February 1, 1988 CITY ENGINEER'S CONDITIONS PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A ZONING CLEARANCE, THE FOLLOWING CONDI- TIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED: -45. • 46. The applicant shall submit to the City of Moorpark for review, a grading plan prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer; shall obtain a Grading Permit; and shall post sufficient surety guaranteeing completion . The applicant shall submit to the City of Moorpark for review, a detailed Soils Report certified by a registered professional Civil Engineer in the State of California. The grading plan shall incorporate the recommendation of the approved Soils Report. e 47. The applicant shall submit to the City of Moorpark for review, street improvement plans prepared by Registered Civil Engineer; shall enter into an agreement with the City of Moorpark to complete the improvements; and shall post sufficient surety guaranteeing the construction of the improvements. The improvements shall include concrete curb and gutter, sidewalk, street lights, striping and signing, paving, and any necessary transitions in accordance with the Ventura County Road Standards. The applicable Road Standard Plates are as follows: a. A meandering sidewalk shall be constructed along Los Angeles A venue, with the plans approved by the Director of Community Development. b. Driveways to be constructed per Plate E-2 and to be 30 feet wide. 48. The applicant shall demonstrate for each building pad to the satisfaction of the a. Adequate protection from 100-year frequency storm; and b. Feasible access during a 10-year frequency storm. Hydrology calculations shall be per current Ventura County Standards. 49. The applicant shall indicate in writing to the ,City of Moorpark, the disposition of any water well(s) and any other water that may exist within the site. If any wells are proposed to be abandoned, or if they are abandoned and have not been properly sealed, they must be destroyed per Ventura County Ordinance No. 2372. 24 \9 DEVELOPMENT PLAN PERMIT NO.: DP-393 -396 DP-393 -396 Siegel & Associates, Inc. APPLICANT: DATE: February l, 1988 CITY ENGINEER'S CONDITIONS (Cont'd.) -so. The applicant shall submit to the City of Moorpark for review, drainage plans, hydrologic, and hydraulic calculations prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer; shall enter into an agreement with the City of Moorpark to complete the improvement and shall post sufficient surety guaranteeing the construction of the improvements. The drainage plans and calculations shall indicate the following conditions before and after development. Quantities of water, water flow rates, major water courses, drainage areas and patterns, diversions, collection systems, flood hazard areas, sumps and drainage courses. Hydrology shall be per current Ventura County Standards except as follows: a. All sumps shall carry a 50-year· frequency storm; b. All catch basins on continuous grade shall carry a 10-year storm; c. All catch basins in a sump condition shall be sized such that depth of water at intake shall equal depth of approach flows; d. All culverts shall carry a 1090-year frequency storm; e. Drainage facilities shall be provided such that surface flows are intercepted and contained prior to entering collector or secondary roadways; f. Under a 10-year frequency storm, all collector streets shall be provided with a minimum of one travel land with a goal that local, residential streets shall have one travel land available where possible. adjacent to the west property line. g. The applicant shall pay all energy costs associated with street lighting for a period of one year from the initial energizing of the street lights. h. The applicant shall have prepared a geotechnical investigation with regard to liquifaction. Per the City's safety element, this report shall be prepared by a Registered Professional Civil Engineer or Geologist. 25 zo DEVELOPMENT PLAN PERMIT NO.: DP-393 -396 DP-393 -396 Siegel & Associates, Inc. APPLICANT: DATE: February 1, 1988 CITY ENGINEER'S CONDITIONS (Cont'd.) i. The applicant shall execute a covenant running with the land on behalf of itself and its successors, heirs, and assigns agreeing to participate in the formation of an assessment district or other financing technique including, but not limited to, the payment of traffic mitigation fees, which the City may implement or adopt, to fund public street and traffic improvements directly or indirectly affected by the development. j. The applicant shall off er to dedicate the City of Moorpark access easements over all private streets shown on the Tentative Map to provide access for all governmental agencies providing the public safety, health and welfare. k. That lot to lot drainage easements and secondary drainage easements shall be delineated on the grading plan.· Assurance shall be provided to the City that these easements will be adequately maintained by property owners to safely convey storm water flows. PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A BUILDING PERMIT, THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED: e 50A. Items required to be submitted in Condition Nos. 45, 46, 47, and 50 shall be approved. DURING CONSTRUCTION, THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL APPLY: 51. That prior to any work being conducted within the State or City right of way, the applicant shall obtain an Encroachment Permit from the appropriate Agency. 52. If any hazardous waste is encountered during the construction of this project, all ._ ... _•c:7!~ ~!;~!! ~~ ;~~~~i~t:::!:; :;topped an~ the ~tentura County Environmer..ta! Hea!th Department, the Fire Department, the Sheriff's Department, and the City Inspector shall be notified immediately. Work shall not proceed until clearance has been issued by all of these agencies. 53. If grading is to take place during the rainy season, an erosion control plan shall be submitted for review and approval along with the grading plan. Along with the erosion control measures hydroseeding of all graded slopes shall be required within 60 days of completion of grading. 26 2\ DEVELOPMENT PLAN PERMIT NO.: APPLICANT: DATE: VENTURA COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS DP-393 -396 DP-393 -396 Siegel & Associates, Inc. February 1, 1988 DURING CONSTRUCTION, THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL APPLY: 54. A licensed security guard is required during the construction phase, or a 6-foot high chain fence shall be erected around the construction site. 55. Construction equipment, tools, etc., shall be properly secured during non-working hours. 56. Lighting devices shall be high enough as to eliminate anyone on the ground from tampering with them. All parking areas shall be provided with a lighting system capable of illumination the parking surface with a minimum of I -foot candle of light and shall be designed to minimize the spillage of light onto adjacent properties. All exterior lighting devices shall be protected by weather and breakage-resistant covers. 57. Landscaping at entrances/exits or at any intersection with the parking lot shall not block or screen the view of a seated driver from another moving vehicle or pedestrian. 58. Landscaping (trees) shall not be placed directly under any overhead lighting which could cause a loss of light at ground level. 59. All exterior doors shall be constructed of solid wood core a minimum of 1 and 3/4-inches thick or of metal construction. Front glass door(s) commonly used for entry are acceptable but should be visible to the street. 60. Doors utilizing a cylinder lock shall have a minimum five (5) pin tumbler operation with the locking bar or bolt extending into the receiving guide a minimnm nf 1 in~h PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED: 61. Address shall be clearly visible to approaching emergency vehicles and mounted against a contrasting color. 62. Address numbers shall be a minimum of 6 inches in height and illuminated during the hours of darkness. 63. There shall not be any easy exterior access to the roof area, i.e., ladders, trees, high walls, etc. 27 2 2. DEVELOPMENT PLAN PERMIT NO.: APPLICANT: DATE: DP-393 -396 DP-393 -396 Siegel & Associates, Inc. February 1, 1988 VENTURA COUNTY FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT CONDITIONS PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF ZONING CLEARANCE, THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED: 64. That building plans of public assembly areas, which have an occupant load of 50 or more, shall be submitted to the Ventura County Bureau of Fire Prevention for review. 65. That if any building(s) are to be protected by an automatic sprinkler system, plans shall be submitted, with payment for plan check, to the Ventura County Bureau of Fire Prevention for review. 66. That any structure greater than 5,000 square feet in area and/or 5 miles from a fire station shall be provided with an automatic fire sprinkler system in accordance with Ventura County Ordinance #14. DURING CONSTRUCTION, THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED: 67. That a width of 25 feet shall be provided for all streets and driveways. 68. That access roads shall be installed with an all weather surface, suitable for access by fire department apparatus. 69. That all drives shall have a minimum vertical clearance of 13 feet, 6 inches (13' 6"). 70. That the access roadway shall be extended to within 150 feet of all portions of the exterior walls of the first story of any building. Where the access roadway cannot be provided, approved fire protection system or systems shall be installed as required and acceptable to the Bureau of Fire Prevention. 71. That prior to construction, the applicant shall submit plans to the Ventura County Bureau of Fire Prevention for approval of the location of fire hydrants. Show existing hydrants on plan within 300 feet of the development. 72. That fire hydrants shall be installed and in service prior to combustible construction and shall conform to the minimum standards of the County Water Works Manual. a. Each hydrant shall be a 6-inch wet barrel design and shall have one 4-inch and two 2 1/2-inch outlet(s). 28 23 DEVELOPMENT PLAN PERMIT NO.: DP-393 -396 DP-393 -396 Siegel & Associates. Inc. APPLICANT: DATE: February 1, 1988 VENTURA COUNTY FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT CONDITIONS (Cont'd.) b. The required fire flow shall be achieved at no less than 20 psi residual pressure. c. Fire hydrants shall be spaced 300 feet on center, and so located that no structure will be farther than 150 feet from any one hydrant. d. Fire hydrants shall be recessed in from curb face 24-inches at center. 73. That plans for the installation of an automatic fire extinguishing system (such as, halon or dry chemical) shall be submitted to the Ventura County Bureau of Fire Prevention for review to insure proper installation. PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A BUILDING PERMIT, THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED: 74. That the minimum fire flow required is determined by the type of building construction, proximity to other structures, fire walls, and fire protection devices provided, as specified by the I.S.O. Guide for Determining Required Fire Flow. Given the present plans and information, the required fire flow is approximately 2000 gallons per minute. The applicant shall verify that the water purveyor can provide the required quantity at the project. PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY, THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED: 75. That all grass or brush exposing any structures shall be cleared for a distance of 100 feet prior to framing, according to the Ventura County Weed Abatement Ordinance. 76. That address numbers, a minimum of 6 inches high, :si1all be ln:;t~11ed pd0!" !0 occupancy, shall be of contrasting color to the background; and shall be readily visible at night. Where structures are setback more than 250 feet from the street, larger numbers will be required so that they are distinguishable from the street, the address number(s) shall be posted adjacent to the driveway entrance. 77. That a plan shall be submitted to the Ventura County Bureau of Fire Prevention for review indicating the method in which buildings are to be identified by address numbers. 78. That fire extinguishers shall be installed in accordance with National Fire Protection Association. Pamphlet #10. The placement of extinguishers shall be reviewed by the Fire Prevention Bureau. 29 24 DEVELOPMENT PLAN PERMIT NO.: APPLICANT: DATE: DP-393 -396 DP-393 -396 Siegel & Associates, Inc. February l, 1988 VENTURA COUNTY AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT CONDITIONS PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A BUILDING PERMIT, THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED: 79. The District shall be notified at the time of original occupancy and each time there is a change in occupancy of tenants leasing space from the projects so the District may review activities and materials to be warehoused or manufactured. 30 25 DEVELOPMENT PLAN PERMIT NO.: APPLICANT: DATE: WATERWORKS DISTRICT CONDITIONS GENERAL REQUIREMENTS: DP-393 -396 DP-393 -396 Siegel & Associates. Inc. February 1, 1988 80. All future tenants shall comply with the District's Rules and Regulations including existing or subsequently adopted waste discharge ordinances, policies or procedures. PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A BUILDING PERMIT, THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED: 8 l. That the District be allowed to review the adequacy and level of service for each project when tenant improvements are requested. Additional facilities, onsite treatment, or other modifications may be required as a condition of certain tenant improvements. 31 26 DEVELOPMENT PLAN PERMIT NO.: DP-393 -396 DP-393 -396 Siegel & Associates, Inc. APPLICANT: DATE: February I, 1988 CALTRANS CONDITIONS PRIOR TO ZONING CLEARANCE, THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED: -82. Prior to zone clearance, Developer shall make a supplementary contribution to the Los angeles Avenue Area of Contribution in the amount of $70,000, representing half of the estimated project costs to construct a traffic signal at the intersection of Maureen Lane at Los Angeles Avenue and to perform such reasonable necessary traffic studies as may be required by the City Engineer. 32 DEVELOPMENT PLAN PERMIT NO.: DP-393 -396 DP-393 -396 Siegel & Associates, Inc. APPLICANT: DATE: February 1, 1988 VENTURA COUNTY ENVIRONMENT AL HEALTH DIVISION CONDITTONS PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A ZONING CLEARANCE, THE FOLLOWING CONDI- TIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED: 83. Prior to issuance of a zone clearance for the inauguration of any use in the proposed structures, such use shall be reviewed and approved by the Ventura County Environmental Health Division. PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY, THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED: 84. The applicant shall ensure that the volume of hazardous waste will be reduced or eliminated by undertaking the following: a. Alter processes to eliminate • or reduce the amount of hazardous waste generated. b. Develop a waste exchange program. c. Recycle the waste. d. Construct or install on-site hazardous waste treatment facilities. 85. The applicant shall ensure that groundwater pollution and other environmental damage will be avoided by undertaking the following: a. Install and maintain proper containment. b. Comply with all hazardous waste generator laws for storage, handling, transportation and disposal. 33 DEVELOPMENT PLAN PERMIT NO.: APPLICANT: DATE: DP-393 -396 DP-393 -396 Siegel & Associates, Inc. February 1, 1988 ADDITIONAL PLANNING COMMISSION CONDffiON (March 7, 1988) 4t 86. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall pay a fee consistent with a schedule adopted by the City Council for Transportation Systems Management (TSM). The Director of Community Development shall notify the City Council once a zoning clearance for DP-393 -396 has been approved (in the event a TSM schedule has not been adopted by that time). 34 29 RESOLUTION NO. PC-88-167 A RESOLUTION OF THE MOORPARK PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVE THE MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR DP-397 -404 ON THE APPLICATIONS OF SIEGEL & ASSOCIATES, INC. WHEREAS, at a duly noticed public hearing on February 1, 1988 , the Planning Commission considered the applications filed by Siegel & Associates, Inc. requesting approval to construct eight (8) industrial facilities totalling 45,805 s.f., located on the eastside of Maureen Lane north of Los Angeles A venue. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, after review and consideration of the infor- mation contained in the staff report dated Ma re h 7, 1988 -------------------and the Mitigated Negative Declaration, has found that these facilities will not have a significant effect on the environment; and has reached its decision in the matter. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has held a public hearing on the recommen- dation to City Council for approval of the Mitigated Negative Declaration; WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed all environmental documenta- tion prepared to evaluate the proposed projects; NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION, OF THE CITY OF MOOR- PARK, CALIFORNIA, DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION l. Pursuant to the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (Division 13 of the Public Resources Code of the State of California (beginning at Section 21000) the Planning Commission of the City of Moorpark recommends that the City Council approve the Mitigated Negative Declaration. SECTION 2. That the findings contained in Section IV of staff report dated M~r-ch 7, 1 Q8R which report is incorporated by reference as though fully set forth herein with conditions as Q1odified by said Commission, are hereby recommt:nded to the City Council for approval; ' SECTION 3. That at its meeting of March 7, 1988 , the Planning Com- m1ss1on took action to direct staff to prepare a Resolution with attached staff recommended conditions, as modified, to recommend that the City Council accept the Mitigated Negative Declaration; recommend that the City Council certify that the information was considered on decisions related to the project; and, recommend that the City Council approve the Mitigated Negative Declaration said Resolution to be presented for Consent Calendar action at the next regular scheduled meeting. The action with the foregoing direction was approved by the following roll call vote; AYES: Commissioner,s Holland, Montgomery, Butcher, Wozniak and Lawrason; NOES: None; ABSENT: None; PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS _2__,_/J_ff-___ J ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: Acting Secretary rector of ent I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing resolution was duly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Moorpark, California, at a regular meeting held on the 21st day of March 1988, roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: ATTEST: Commissioners Montgomery, Wozniak, Butcher, Holland, and Lawrason; None; None; None. ~ -/ r_/ ~c/?~✓~ Celia LaFleur, Secretary RESOLUTION NO. PC-88-168 LDM-10 DP-397 -404 A RESOLUTION OF THE MOORPARK PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA APPROVING DP-397 -404 ON THE APPLICATION OF SIEGEL & ASSOCIATES, INC. WHEREAS, at a duly noticed public hearing on February 1. 1988 the Planning Commission considered applications filed by Siegel & Associates, Inc. requesting approval to construct eight industrial facilities of $45,805 square feet and located on the eastside of Maureen Lane north of Los Angeles A venue. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, after review and consideration of the infor- mation contained in the staff report dated March 7, 1988 and the Mitigated Negative Declaration, has found that these projects will not have a significant effect on the environment; and has reached its decision in the matter; WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has held a public hearing on the adoption of such development plans, and; WHEREAS, the Planning Commission does hereby FIND that the adoption of such development plans is consistent with the City's General Plan; NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA, DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. Pursuant to the provision of the California Environmental Quality Act (Division 13) of the Public Resources Code of the State of California (beginning at Section 21000) the Planning Commission of the City of Moorpark recommends that the City Council approve Development Plan Permits Nos. 397-404. SECTION 2. That the finding contained in Section IV of the Planning Commis- sion staff report dated Ma re h 7, 1988 , which report is incorporated. by reference as thoug'1, fully set forth herein with conditions as modified by said Commission, are hereby recommended by the City Council for approval; SECTION 3. That at its meeting of March 7, 1988 , the Planning Commission took action to direct staff to prepare a Resolution with attached staff recommended conditions, as modified, to recommended that the City Council approve Development Plan Permits Nos. 397-404. Said Resolution to be presented for Consent Calendar action at the next regular scheduled meeting. The action with the foregoing direction was approved by the following roll call vote; AYES: Commissioners Holland, Montgomery, Butcher, Wozniak and Lawrason; NOES: None; ABSENT: None; ATTEST: / ff • '--/✓-Y fl ~ <~~J~,C,,,i- Acting Secretary APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: rector of t I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing resolution was duly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Moorpark, California, at a regular meeting held on the 21st day of March 1988, roll call vote: 33 AYES: NOES: Commissioners Montgomery, Wozniak, Butcher, Holland, and Lawrason; None; ABSENT: None; ABSTAIN: None. ATTEST: ,-"7 ,,.._ / ·/,,,... ~~~ Celia LaFleur, Secretary DEVELOPMENT PLAN PERMIT: APPLICANT: DATE: DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CONDITIONS GENERAL REQUIREMENTS: LDM-10 DP-397 -404 DP-397 -404 Siegel & Associates, Inc. February 1, 1988 1. That permits are granted for the land and projects on the submitted plot plans and elevations. That the location and design of all site improvements shall be as shown on the approved plot plans and elevations. 2. That unless the projects are inaugurated (building foundation slab in place and substantial work in progress) not later than one (1) year after these permits are granted, these permits shall automatically expire on that date. The Director of Community Development may, at his discretion, grant up to one (l) additional year extension from project inauguration if there have been no changes in the adjacent areas and if permittee can document that he has diligently worked toward inauguration or projects during the initial one-year period. 3. That any minor changes may be approved by the Director of Community Develop- ment upon the filing of a Minor Modification application, and the passing before the Planning Commission prior to the appeal period ending. Any Major Modifica- tion is to be approved by the City Council. 4. That the design, maintenance and operation of the permit areas and facilities thereon shall comply with all applicable requirements and enactments of Federal, State, and County and City authorities, and all such requirements and enactments shall, by reference, become conditions of these permits. 5. That no conditions of these entitlements shall be interpreted as permitting or requmng any violation of law or any unlawful rules or regulations or orders of an authorized governmental agency. In instances where more than one set of rules apply, the stricter ones shall take precedence. 6. That if any of the conditions or limitations of these development plans are held to be invalid, that holding shall not invalidate any of the remaining conditions or limitations set forth. 7. That the permittees agree as a condition of issuance and use of these permits to defend, at his sole expense, any action brought against the City because of issuance (or renewal) of these permits or in the alternative to relinquish these permits. Permittees will reimburse the City for any court cost which the City may be required by court to pay as a result of any such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate in the defense of any such action, but such participation shall not relieve permittees of his obligation under this condition. 32 LDM-10 DP-397 -404 DEVELOPMENT PLAN PERMIT: DP-397 -404 Siegel & Associates, Inc. APPLICANT: DATE: February 1, 1988 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CONDITIONS (Cont'd.) 8. That permittees' acceptance of these permits and/or operation under these permits shall be deemed to be acceptance by permittee of all conditions of these permits. 9. That the developments are subject to all applicable regulations of the (Limited Industrial) zone and all agencies of the State of California, County of Ventura, City of Moorpark, and any other governmental entities. PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A ZONING CLEARANCE, THE FOLLOWING CONDI- TIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED: 10. (3e)L.D DOT \)..1\-J\~~ r-11. I NDll-A'fe~ r c.~A)..Y::f~ t1-.1 WOl2.0ltJl1 -1"' rt>tZ---r t+f\: ' co,JD\t'ON ,.._~ ree. C..0\-( l-{ \f$,IOtJ A.C,•f\CN k1 \-\~t~~ That prior to construction for each project, a zone clearance shall be obtained from the Department of Community Development and a building permit shall be obtained for each project from the Building and Safety Division. That prior to the issuance of a zone clearance, a landscaping and planting plan (3 sets), together with specifications and maintenance program, prepared by a State licensed landscape architect in accordance with County Guidelines for Landscape Plan Check, shall be submitted to the Director of Community Development for review. The applicant shall bear the total cost of such review and of final installation inspection. The landscaping and planting plan shall be accompanied by a fee specified by the City of Moorpark. All landscaping and planting shall be accomplished and approved by the Director of Community Development prior to the issuance of any occupancy permit for DP-397 -404. 12. That final landscape plans for each project shall provide for a 50% shade coverage within all parking areas. Shade coverage is described as the maximum mid-day shaded area defined by a selected specimen tree at 50% maturity. Landscaping and irrigation shall be provided to the curb adjacent. 13. That all turf plantings associated with these projects shall be drought tolerant, low-water using variety. Plantings in and adjacent to parking in vehicular area shall be contained within raised planters surrounded by 6" high concrete curbs. 14. Landscaping shall not obscure any exterior door or window from street view. 15. Landscaping at entrances/exits or at any intersection within the parking lot shall not block or screen the view of a seated driver from another moving vehicle or pedestrian. 33 LDM-10 DP-397 -404 DEVELOPMENT PLAN PERMIT: DP-397 -404 Siegel & Associates, Inc. APPLICANT: DATE: February 1, 1988 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CONDITIONS (Cont'd.) 16. Landscaping (trees) shall not be placed directly under any overhead lighting which could cause a loss of light at ground level. 17. That all roof mounted equipment (vents, stacks, blowers, air conditioning equipment) that may extend above any parapet wall shall be enclosed on all four sides by view obscuring material. Prior to the issuance of a zone clearance, the final design of the roof screening and location of any roof mounted equipment of the projects must be approved by the Director of Community Development. 18. That all tr.ash disposal areas shall be provided in a location which will not interfere with circulation, parking or access to the building and shall be screened with a six-(6) foot high, solid wall enclosure with metal gates, final design of said enclosure shall be subject to the approval of the Director of Community Develop- ment prior to the issuance of zone clearance. 19. That signs are subject to the Moorpark Code, Chapter 50, Title 9, Sign Ordinance. A sign permit is required. No building signs of any type shall be allowed on any building wall or window. Only a monument sign shall be permitted for these development plans and shall not exceed 30 square feet, no higher than 5 feet above average ground level. A sign program shall be submitted and approved by the Director of Community Development for all signage. 20. Roof design and construction for each project shall include a mm1mum 18-inch exte::isio::i of the p&rapet wall above the highest point of the roof. -21. • 22. Prior to issuance of a zoning clearance, the final working drawings shall be submitted to the Director of Community Development for review . For ail exterior lighting, a lighting plan shaU. ue prepareo oy an eiectricai engineer registered in the State of California and submitted to the Department of Community Development for review prior to the issuance of a zone clearance. The lighting plan shall achieve the following objectives: A void interference with reasonable use of adjoining properties; minimize to the greatest extent possible on-site glare; provide adequate on-site lighting; limit electroliers height to avoid excessive illumination; provide lighting structures which are compatible with the total design of the proposed facility. 34 LDM-10 DP-397 -404 DEVELOPMENT PLAN PERMIT: DP-397 -404 Siegel & Associates, Inc. APPLICANT: DATE: February 1, 1988 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CONDffiONS (Cont'd.) These plans include the following: a. A photometric plan showing a point by point foot candle minimum twenty-(20) feet outside the property lines. based on a ten-(10) foot grid center. layout to extend a Layout plan to be b. Maximum overall height of pole fixtures shall be not more than twenty (20) feet. c. Fixtures must have sharp cut-off qualities at property lines. d. There shall be no more than a seven to one (7:1) ratio of level of illumination shown. (Maximum to minimum ratio between Lighting Standards.) e. Low pressure energy efficient light fixtures shall be used. f. Average maximum of one foot candle illumination. 23. Pullover parking (overhangs) shall be limited to 24 inches maximum. 24. That the applicant shall construct a utility room(s) with common access to house all meters. No exterior ladders shall be permitted. 25. The applicant shall, prior to the issuance of a zone clearance for each project, execute a covenant running with the land on behalf of itself and its successors, heirs and assigns agreeing to participate in the formation of and be subject to any assessment district or other financing technique including but not limited to the payment of traffic mitigation fees, which the City may implement or adopt, to i\.rn1 V'-'~~;c;. :;~"-cc: _:;-;_,~ ~;-~rf:'.' =~~:-:::·-·~~'!!'~': r!•r~,:-tly nr indirectly affected by the development. Traffic mitigation fees shall be used for projects such as, but not limited to, the extension of New Los Angeles A venue. e 26. (Deleted) 27. That no asbestos pipe or construction materials shall be used for the projects entitlement without prior approval of the City Council. 28. Prior to zone clearance, the applicant shall have approval by the Director of Community Development to provide skylights that are as opaque as feasible to minimize potential evening illumination as viewed from the exterior. 35 DEVELOPMENT PLAN PERMIT: APPLICANT: DATE: LDM-10 DP-397 -404 DP-397 -404 Siegel & Associates. Inc. February 1, 1988 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CONDITIONS (Cont'd.) PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A BUILDING PERMIT, THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED: 29. That prior to the issuance of a building permit for each project the developer shall pay all school assessment fees levied by the Moorpark Unified School District. DURING CONSTRUCTION, THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED: 30. That all utilities shall be underground to the nearest off-site utility pole except through transmission lines. 31. That all parking shall be surfaced with asphalt or concrete and shall include adequate provisions for drainage, striping and appropriate wheel blocks or curbs in parking areas. 32. That at the time water service connection is made for each project, cross connection control devices shall be installed on the water system in accordance with the requirements of the Ventura County Environmental Health Department. PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY, THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED: 33. That prior to the occupancy or change of occupancy or introduction of an additional occupancy of these buildings by the tenants, either the owner or prospective tenant shall apply for the use of these buildings. The purpose of the zoning clearance shall determine if the proposed uses are compatible with the existing zoning and terms and conditions of these permits. 34. That no later than ten (10) days after any change of property owner or of !~'.;'.:""('.:) ,..-:-,..;:'""."~!---~~"' -:-£' !l,_~ .,,_,nc!<>rt 11C:PC:, thP.rP. shall be filed with the Director of Community Development the names(s) and address(es) of the new owner(s) lessee(s) or operator(s), together with a letter from any such person(s), acknowledging and agreeing to comply with all conditions of these permits prior to zone clearance. 35. Prior to occupancy by any tenant or subsequent owner that would employ or dispose of hazardous waste or materials, a Major Modification shall be processed and filed. 36 3S DEVELOPMENT PLAN PERMIT: APPLICANT: DATE: LDM-10 DP-397 -404 DP-397 -404 Siegel & Associates, Inc. February I, 1988 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CONDITIONS (Cont'd.) 36. All roof top mechanical equipment and other noise generation sources onsite be attenuated to 55 dBA at the property line. That prior to the issuance of the certificate of occupancy the applicant shall submit a report to demonstrate to the satisfaction of the Director of Community Development that all onsite noise generation sources have been mitigated to this level. The report shall be prepared by a licensed acoustical engineer in accordance with accepted engineering standards. PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A BUILDING PERMIT, THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED: 4t 36A. Items submitted for review in Condition Nos. 11, 21, and 22 shall be approved. AFTER ISSUANCE OF A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY, THE FOLLOWING CON- DITIONS SHALL BE APPLICABLE: 37. That the continued maintenance of the permit area and facilities shall be subject to periodic inspection by the City. The permittee shall be required to remedy any defects in ground maintenance, as indicated by the Code Enforcement Officer within thirty (30) days after notification. 38. No outside storage of any materials or overnight semi-trucks or truck trailers, beyond the loading bays, of any kind shall be permitted after occupancy. 39. No repair or maintenance of trucks or any vehicle shall occur on the subject sites. 40. Loading and unloading operations shall not be conducted between the hours of I 0:00 p.m. and 6:00 a.m. 37 LDM-10 DP-397 -404 DEVELOPMENT PLAN PERMIT: DP-397 -404 Siegel & Associates. Inc. APPLICANT: DATE: February l, 1988 CITY ENGINEER'S CONDITIONS PRIOR TO ZONING CLEARANCE, THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED: -41. -42. -43. The applicant shall submit to the City of Moorpark for review, a grading plan prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer; shall obtain a Grading Permit; and shall post sufficient surety guaranteeing completion. The applicant shall submit to the City of Moorpark for review. a detailed Soils Report certified by a registered professional Civil Engineer in the State of California. . The grading plan shall incorporate the recommendations of the approved Soils Report. The applicant shall submit to the City of Moorpark for review. street improvement plans prepared by Registered Civil Engineer; shall enter into an agreement with the City of Moorpark to complete the improvements; and shall post sufficient surety guaranteeing the construction of the improvements. The improvements shall include concrete curb and gutter. sidewalk, street lights, striping and signing. paving. and any necessary transitions in accordance with the Ventura County Road Standards. The applicable Road Standard Plates are as follows: a. "C" Street, "D" Avenue, "A" Court, and "B" Court to be constructed per Plate B-3D modified to have 40 feet pavement width and 50 feet right-of-way width. b. Maureen Lane to be constructed per Plate B-3D. c. All cul-de-saces to be constructed per Plate C-3. d. All streets shall have a minimum of 4 inches of asphalt. e. Driveways to be constructed per Plate E-2 and to be 30 feet wide. 44. The applicant shall demonstrate for each building pad to the satisfaction of the City of Moorpark as follows: a. Adequate protection from 100-year frequency storm; and b. Feasible access during a IO-year frequency storm. 38 4c, LDM-10 DP-397 -404 DEVELOPMENT PLAN PERMIT: DP-397 -404 Siegel & Associates, Inc. APPLICANT: DATE: February 1, 1988 CITY ENGINEER'S CONDIDONS (Cont'd.) Hydrology calculations shall be per current Ventura County Standards. 45. The applicant shall deposit with the City of Moorpark a contribution for the Los Angeles A venue Improvement Area of Contribution. The actual deposit shall be the then current Los Angeles A venue Improvement Area of Contribution applicable rate at the time the building permit is issued. 46. The applicant shall indicate in writing to the City of Moorpark, the disposition of any water well(s) and any other water that may exist within the site. If any wells are proposed to be abandoned, or if they are abandoned and have not been properly sealed, they must be destroyed per Ventura County Ordinance No. 2372. -47. The applicant shall submit to the City of Moorpark for review, drainage plans, hydrologic, and hydraulic calculations prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer; shall enter into an agreement with the City of Moorpark to complete the improve- ment and shall post sufficient surety guaranteeing the construction of the improvements. The drainage plans and calculations shall indicate the following conditions before and after development. Quantities of water, water flow rates, major water courses, drainage areas and patterns, diversions, collection systems, flood hazard areas, sumps and drainage courses. Hydrology shall be per current Ventura County Standards except as follows: a. All sumps shall carry a 50-year frequency storm; b. All catch basins on continuous grade shall carry a 10-year storm; c. All catch basins in a sump condition shall be sized such that depth of water at intake shall equal depth of approach flows; d. All culverts shall carry a 100-year frequency storm; e. Drainage facilities shall be provided such that surface flows are intercepted and contained prior to entering collector or secondary roadways; . f. Under a 10-year frequency storm, all collector streets shall be provided with a minimum of one travel lane with a goal that local, residential streets shall have one travel lane available where possible. 39 DEVELOPMENT PLAN PERMIT: APPLICANT: DATE: CITY ENGINEER'S CONDITIONS (Cont'd.) LDM-10 DP-397 -404 DP-397 -404 Siegel & Associates, Inc. February 1, 1988 If a travel lane cannot be maintained as described in f. above, the storm drain will be extended and/or additional catch basins provided to satisfy this condition. 48. The applicant shall pay all energy costs associated with street lighting for a period of one year from the initial energizing of the street lights. 49. The applicant shall have prepared a geotechnical investigation with regard to liquifaction. Per the City's Safety Element, this report shall be prepared by a Registered Professional Civil Engineer or Geologist. 50. The applicant shall execute a covenant running with the land on behalf of itself and its successors, heirs, and assigns agreeing to participate in the formation of an assessment district or other financing technique including, but not limited to, the payment of traffic mitigation fees, which the City may implement or adopt, to fund public street and traffic improvements directly or indirectly affected by the development. AFTER ZONE CLEARANCE THE FOLLOWING CONDITION SHALL APPLY: l e 50A. If within 8 months following zone clearance of the first DP within LDM-10 the Applicant has not completed construction of "D" Avenue and the developer of LDM-8 then constructs the improvements, the applicant shall reimburse the developer of LDM-8 for all direct construction expenses. Reimbursement shall be made prior to the time that the applicant would otherwise be required to complete the improvements pursuant to these conditions. If necessary, the City Engineer will make the final determination of the reimbursement amount. PRIOR TO !SSTJANCE OF A BUILDING PERMIT, THE FOLLOWING CONDITION SHALL BE SATISFIED: -50B. Items required for submittal in Condition Nos. 41, 42, 43, and 47 shall be approved. DURING CONSTRUCTION, THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL APPLY: 51. That prior to any work being conducted within the State or City right of way, the applicant shall obtain an Encroachment Permit from the appropriate Agency. 40 DEVELOPMENT PLAN PERMIT: APPLICANT: DATE: CITY ENGINEER'S CONDITIONS (Cont'd.) LDM-10 DP-397 -404 DP-397 -404 Siegel & Associates. Inc. February 1. 1988 52. If any hazardous waste is encountered during the construction of this project. all work shall be immediately stopped and the Ventura County Environmental Health Department, the Fire Department, the Sheriff's Department. and the City Inspector shall be notified immediately. Work shall not proceed until clearance has been issued by all of these agencies. 53. Where roads are to-be built requiring 4 or more inches of pavement, applicant shall construct the required street section minus I-inch of paving as an interim condition until all utility cuts or trenching is completed. The final I-inch cap of asphalt shall be placed after all necessary trenching is completed. 54. If grading is to take place during the rainy season, an erosion control plan shall be submitted for review and approval 1;tlong with the grading plan. Along with the erosion control measures, hydroseeding of all graded slopes shall be required within 60 days of completion of grading. 9 55. Condition No. 55 has been renumbered to Condition No. 56A. 56. To assist the City Engineer in determining when a traffic signal should be installed at the intersection of Los Angeles A venue with Maureen Lane, the developer shall conduct manual turning counts from 6:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. prior to the issuance of zone clearance for Development Projects corresponding to 40%, 65%, and 90% of the developable portion of LDM-10. If this information is provided by other sources (City, Caltrans, or other de-velopraants) tc the City Engineer's satisfaction, part or all of this condition may be waived by the City Engineer. PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY, THE FOLLOWING CONDITION SHALL BE SATISFIED: 56A. "C" Street and "D" A venue are to be completeiy construct~u ;.;r ~r 0 t::-:.:.~:::- clearance of 25% of the total developable land area within LDM-10, or by July 1, 1989, whichever occurs first. Regardless of the above time limits, "C" Street and "D" A venue are to be completed prior to occupancy of any lot taking access to "D" A venue or "C" Street, or prior to completion of the Maureen Lane Signal. 41 DEVELOPMENT PLAN PERMIT: APPLICANT: DATE: CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS LDM-10 DP-397 -404 DP-397 -404 Siegel & Associates. Inc. February 1. 1988 DURING CONSTRUCTION, THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL APPLY: 57. A 6-foot high chain fence shall be erected around the construction site. 58. Construction equipment, tools, etc., shall be properly secured during non-working hours. 59. Lighting devices shall be high enough as to eliminate anyone on the ground from tampering with them. All parking areas shall be provided with a lighting system capable of _illuminating the parking surface with a minimum of I -foot candle of light and shall be designed to minimize the spillage of light onto adjacent properties. All exterior lighting devices shall be protected by weather and breakage-resistant covers. 60. Landscaping at entrances/exits or at any intersection with the parking lot shall not block or screen the view of a seated driver from another moving vehicle or pedestrian. 61. Landscaping (trees) shall not be placed directly under any overhead lighting which could cause a loss of light at ground level. 62. All exterior doors shall be constructed of solid wood core a minimum of 1 and 3/4-inches thick or of metal construction. Front glass door(s) commonly used for entry are acceptable but should be visible to the st:eet. 63. Doors utilizing a cylinder lock shall have a minimum five (5) pin tumbler operation with the locking bar or bolt extending into the receiving guide a minimum of 1 inch. PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED: 64. Address shall be clearly visible to approaching emergency vehicles and mounted against a contrasting color. 65. Address numbers shall be a minimum of 6 inches in height and illuminated during the hours of darkness. 66. There shall not be any easy exterior access to the roof area, i.e., ladders, trees. high walls, etc. 42 44- DEVELOPMENT PLAN PERMIT: APPLICANT: DATE: LDM-10 DP-397 -404 DP-397 -404 Siegel & Associates. Inc. February 1, 1988 VENTURA COUNTY FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT CONDffiONS PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF ZONING CLEARANCE, THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED: 67. That building plans of public assembly areas, which have an occupant load of 50 or more, shall be submitted to the Ventura County Bureau of Fire Prevention for review. 68. That if any building(s) are to be protected by an automatic sprinkler system, plans shall be submitted, with payment for plan check, to the Ventura County Bureau of Fire Prevention for review. 69. That any structure greater than 5,000 square feet in area and/or 5 miles from a fire station shall be provided with an automatic fire sprinkler system in accordance with Ventura County Ordinance #14. DURING CONSTRUCTION, THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: 70. That a width of 25 feet shall be provided for all streets and driveways. 71. That access roads shall be installed with an all weather surface, suitable for access by fire department apparatus. 72. That all drives shall have a minimum vertical clearance of 13 feet, 6 inches (13' 6"). 73. That approved turn around areas for fire apparatus shall be provided where the access road is 150 feet or farther from the main thoroughfare. A turn around is needed for the Community Drive. 74. That prior to construction, the applicant shall submit plans to the Ventura County Bureau of Fire Prevention for approval of the location of fire hydrants. Show existing hydrants on plan within 300 feet of the development. 75. That fire hydrants shall be installed and in service prior to combustible construction and shall conform to the minimum standards of the County Water Works Manual. a. Each hydrant shall be a 6-inch wet barrel design and shall have one 4-inch and two 2 1/2-inch outlet(s). 43 45 LDM-10 DP-397 -404 DEVELOPMENT PLAN PERMIT: DP-397 -404 Siegel & Associates, Inc. APPLICANT: DATE: February 1, 1988 VENTURA COUNTY FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT CONDITIONS (Cont'd.) b. The required fire flow shall be achieved at no less than 20 psi residual pressure. c. Fire hydrants shall be spaced 300 feet on center, and so located that no structure will be farther than 150 feet from any one hydrant. d. Fire hydrants shall be recessed in from curb face 24-inches at center. 76. That plans for the installation of an automatic fire extinguishing system (such as, halon or dry chemical) shall be submitted to the Ventura County Bureau of Fire Prevention for review to insure proper installation. PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A BUILDING PERMIT, THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED: 77. That the minimum fire flow required is determined by the type of building construction, proximity to other structures, fire walls, and fire protection devices provided, as specified by the I.S.O. Guide for Determining Required Fire Flow. Given the present plans and information, the required fire flow is approximately 2000 gallons per minute. The applicant shall verify that the water purveyor can provide the required quantity at the project. PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY, THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED: 78. That all grass or brush exposing any structures shall be cleared for a distance of 100 feet prior to framing, according to the Ventura County Weed Abatement Ordinance. 79. That address numbers, a mm1mum of 6 inches 1Hgn, shaii 'i,,;; :,,:,:.c.~~'=",• ;<,:? ~·':'. occupancy, shall be of contrasting color to the background; and shall be readily visible at night. Where structures are setback more than 250 feet from the street, larger numbers will be required so that they are distinguishable from the street, the address number(s) shall be posted adjacent to the driveway entrance. 80. That a plan shall be submitted to the Ventura County Bureau of Fire Prevention for review indicating the method in which buildings are to be identified by address numbers. 81. That fire extinguishers shall be installed in accordance with National Fire Protection Association, Pamphlet #10. The placement of extinguishers shall be reviewed by the Fire Prevention Bureau. 44 DEVELOPMENT PLAN PERMIT: APPLICANT: DATE: LDM-10 DP-397 -404 DP-397 -404 Siegel & Associates. Inc. February 1, 1988 VENTURA COUNTY FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT CONDITIONS (Cont'd.) 82. That prior to recordation of street names, names shall be submitted to the Bureau of Fire Prevention for review. 83. That street signs shall be installed prior to occupancy. 45 DEVELOPMENT PLAN PERMIT: APPLICANT: DATE: LDM-10 DP-397 -404 DP-397 -404 Siegel & Associates, Inc. February 1, 1988 VENTURA COUNTY AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT CONDITIONS PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A BUILDING PERMIT, THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED: 84. The District shall be notified at the time of original occupancy and each time there is a new tenant leasing space from the projects so the District may review activities and materials to be warehoused or manufactured. 46 48 DEVELOPMENT PLAN PERMIT NO.: APPLICANT: DATE: WATERWORKS DISTRICT CONDITIONS GENERAL REQUIREMENTS: LDM-10 DP-397 -404 DP-397 -404 Siegel & Associates, Inc. February 1, 1988 85. All future tenants shall comply with the District's Rules and . Regulations including existing or subsequently adopted waste discharge ordinances, policies or procedures. PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A BUILDING PERMIT, THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED: 86. That the District be allowed to review the adequacy and level of service for each project when tenant improvements are requested. Additional facilities, onsite treatment, or other modifications may be required as a condition of certain tenant improvements. 47 DEVELOPMENT PLAN PERMIT: APPLICANT: DATE: CAL TRANS CONDmONS LDM-10 DP-397 -404 DP-397 -404 Siegel & Associates, Inc. February 1, 1988 PRIOR TO ZONING CLEARANCE, THE FOLLOWING CONDffiONS SHALL BE SATISFIED: e 87. Prior to zone clearance, Developer shall make a supplementary contribution to the Los angeles Avenue Area of Contribution in the amount of $70,000, representing half of the estimated project costs to construct a traffic signal at the intersection of Maureen Lane at Los Angeles Avenue and to perform such reasonable necessary traffic studies as may be required by the City Engineer. 48 LDM-10 DP-397 -404 DEVELOPMENT PLAN PERMIT: DP-397 -404 Siegel & Associates, Inc. APPLICANT: DATE: February 1, 1988 VENTURA COUNTY ENVIRONMENT AL HEALTH DIVISION CONDITIONS PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A ZONING CLEARANCE, THE FOLLOWING CONDI- TIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED: 88. Prior to issuance of a zone clearance for the inauguration of any use in the proposed structures, such use shall be reviewed and approved by the Ventura County Environmental Health Division. PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY, THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED: 89. The applicant shall ensure that the volume of hazardous waste will be reduced or eliminated by undertaking the following: a. Alter processes to eliminate or reduce the amount of hazardous waste generated. b. Develop a waste exchange program. c. Recycle the waste. d. Construct or install on-site hazardous waste treatment facilities. 90. The applicant shall ensure that groundwater pollution and other environmental damage will be avoided by undertaking the following: a. Install and maintain proper containment. b. Comply with all hazardous waste generator laws for storage, handling, transportation and disposal. 49 DEVELOPMENT PLAN PERMIT: APPLICANT: DATE: LDM-10 DP-397 -404 DP-397 -404 Siegel & Associates, Inc. February 1, 1988 ADDffiONAL PLANNING COMMISSION CONDITION (March 7, 1988) 91. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall .pay a fee consistent with a schedule adopted by the City Council for Transportation Systems Management (TSM). The Director of Community Development shall notify the City Council once a zoning clearance for DP-397 -404 has been approved (in the event a TSM schedule has not been adopted by that time). 50 52.. RE~OLUTION NO. PC-88-169 A RESOLUTION OF T~E MOORPARK PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVE THE MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR LDM-10 ON THE APPLICATIONS OF SIEGEL & ASSOCIATES, INC. WHEREAS, at a duly noticed public hearing on February 1, 1988 , the Planning Commission considered the applications filed by Siegel & Associates, Inc. requesting approval to resubdivide three (3) existing industrial lots into twenty-six (26) industrial lots totalling 12.4 acres, located on the eastside of Maureen Lane north of Los Angeles Avenue. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, after review and consideration of the infor- mation contained in the staff report dated Ma re h 7 , 1988 -------"--~----------and the Mitigated Negative Declaration, has found that these facilities will not have a significant effect on the environmf nt; and has reached its decision in the matter. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has held a public hearing on the recommen- dation to City Council for approval of the Mitigated Negative Declaration; WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed all environmental documenta- tion prepared to evaiuate the proposed projects; NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION, OF THE CITY OF MOOR- PARK, CALIFORNIA, DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. Pursuant to the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (Division 13 of the Public Resources Code of the State of California (beginning at Section 21000) the Planning Commission of the City of Moorpark recommends that the City Council approve the Mitigated Negative Declaration. SECTION 2. March 7, 1988 That th~. findings contained in Section IV of staff report dated which report is incorporated by reference as though fully set forth herein with conditions as modified by said Commission, are hereby recommended to -~ the City Council for approval; SECTION 3. That at its meeting of Ma re h 7, 1988 , the Planning Com- m1ss1on took action to direct staff to prepare a Resolution with attached staff recommended conditions, as modified, to recommend that the City Council certify that the information was considered on decisions related to the project; and, recommend that the City Council approve the Mitigated Negative 'Declaration said Resolution to be presented for Consent Calendar action at the next regular schedutad meeting. The action with the foregoing direction was approved by the following roll call vote; AYES: Commissioners Holland, Montgomery, Butcher, Wozniak and Lawrason; NOES: None; ABSENT: None; ATTEST: Acting Secretary APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: u~ , Director of ent I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing resolution was duly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Moorpark, California, at a regular meeting held on the 21st day of March 1988, roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: ATTEST: Commissioners Montgomery, Wozniak, Butcher, Holland, and Lawrason; None; None; None. //7. c__/---,V/ L-?~c;?y~~. Celia LaFleur, Secretary RESOLUTION NO. PC-88-170 A RESOLUTION OF THE MOORPARK PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA APPROVING TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. LDM-10 ON THE APPLICATIONS OF SIEGEL & ASSOCIATES, INC. WHEREAS, at a duly noticed public hearing on February 1, 1988 , the Planning Commission considered the applications filed by Siegel & Associates, Inc. requesting approval of a resubdivision under Tentative Parcel Map No. LDM-10 to resubdivide three (3) existing industrial lots into twenty-six (26) industrial lots totalling 12.4 acres, located on the eastside of Maureen Lane north of Los Angeles A venue. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, after review and consideration of the infor- mation contained in the staff report dated Ma re h 7 , 1988 GS -------------------and the Mitigated Negative Declaration, has found that this project will not have a significant effect on the environment; and has reached its decision in the matter. NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION, OF THE CITY OF MOOR- PARK, CALIFORNIA, DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I. Pursuant to the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (Division 13 of the Public Resources Code of the State of California (beginning at Section 21000) the Planning Commission of the City of Moorpark approves the Mitigated Negative Declaration. SECTION 2. That the findings contained in the staff report dated March 7, 1988 whic_h report is incorporated by reference as though fully set forth herein with conditions as modified by said Commission, are hereby approval; SECTION 3. That at its meeting of March 7, 1988 , the Planning Com- m1ss1on took action to direct staff to prepare a Resolution with attached staff recommended conditions, as modified, does hereby approve Tentative Parcel Map No. LDM-10, said Resolution to be presented for Consent Calendar action at the next regular scheduled meetrng. l ne acuon wu11 u1e iu1egorng uuectwn was approved by the foiiowing roil cail vote; The action with the foregoing direction was approved by the following roll call vote; AYES: NOES: ABSENT: PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 2/w-t/i;lf!J/12//J. 1988. ~ Chairman ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: Acting Secretary I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing resolut on was duly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Moorpark, Californ a, at a regular meeting held on the 21st day of March 1988, roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: ATTEST: //. ~Y/7 ~c/X-✓~- Celia Lafleur, Secretary LAND DIVISION NO: APPLICANT: DATE: DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CONDmONS GENERAL REQUIREMENTS: LDM-10 DP-397 -404 LDM-10 Siegel & Associates, Inc. February l, 1988 l. That the conditions of approval of this Land Division map supersedes all conflicting notation, specifications, dimensions, typical sections and the like which may be shown on siad map and that all of the provisions of the Subdivision Map Act, City of Moorpark Subdivision Ordinance, and adopted County Policies apply. 2. That all requirements of any law or agency of the State, Ventura County, and City of Moorpark and any other governmental enmity shall be met, and all such requirements and enactment shall, by reference, become conditions of the entitlement. 3. That no condition of this entitlement shall be interpreted as permitting or requiring any violation of law, or any lawful rules or regulations or orders of an authorized governmental agency. In instances where more than one set of rules apply, the stricter ones shall take precedence. 4. That if any of the conditions or limitations of this entitlement are held to be invalid, that holding shall not invalidate any of the remaining conditions or limitations set forth. 5. That applicant agrees as a condition of issuance (or renewal) and use of this permit, to defend, at his sole expense, any action brought against the City because of issuance (or renewal) of this permit or, in the alternative, to relinquish th!s permit. Applicant will reimburse the City for any court costs and/or attorney's fees which the City may be required by a court to pay as a result of any such action the City may, at its sole discretion, participate in the defense of any such ?('tion, hut such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligation under this condition. 6. That applicant's recordation of this map shall be deemed to be acceptance by applicant of all conditions of this land division. PRIOR TO APPROVAL OF FINAL MAP, THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED: 7. As of the date of recordation of final (LDM) map, the lots depicted thereon shall meet the requirements of the zoning ordinance and General Plan then applicable to the property. Compliance with this condition shall be required even if the zoning and General Plan requirements in effect as of the date the tentative mp is 18 5-, LDM-10 DP-397 -404 LAND DIVISION NO.: LDM-10 Siegel & Associates, Inc. APPLICANT: DATE: February l, 1988 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CONDITIONS (Cont'd.) conditionally approved. Conditional approval of the tentative map shall neither limit the power of the legislative body to amend the applicable zoning ordinances and/or general plan nor compel the legislative body to make any such amend- ments. 8. Prior to approval of the final map, the developer shall obtain a "District Release" from the Camrosa Municipal Water District indicating payment of District's Capital Construction charges. 9. Prior to approval of the final map, an "Unconditional Will Serve" letter for water and sewer service shall be obtained from Ventura County Waterworks District No. 1 or that the applicant shall have satisfied all requirements of the Ventura County Waterworks District No. 1 for annexation and will be provided with both water and sewer of provided temporary water service from Camrosa Water District to the satisfaction of the County Water Works District. DURING CONSTRUCTION, THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SA TISIFIED: 10. That at the time water service connection is made, cross connection control devices shall be installed on the water system in accordance with the requirements of the Ventura County Division of Environmental Health. 19 LDM-10 DP-397 -404 LAND DIVISION NO.: LDM-10 Siegel & Associates, Inc. APPLICANT: DATE: February 1, 1988 CITY ENGINEER'S CONDITIONS PRIOR TO APPROVAL OF FINAL MAP, THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED: 11. The applicant shall submit to the City of Moorpark for review and approval, a grading plan prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer; shall obtain a Grading Permit; and shall post sufficient surety guaranteeing completion. 12. The applicant shall submit to the City of Moorpark for review and approval, a detailed Soils Report certified by a registered professional Civil Engineer in the State of California. The grading plan shall incorporate the recommendation of the approved Soils Report. 13. The applicant shall submit to the City of Moorpark for review and approval, street improvement plans prepared by Registered Civil Engineer; shall enter into an agreement with the City of Moorpark to complete the improvements; and shall post sufficient surety guaranteeing the construction of the improvements. The improvements shall include concrete curb and gutter, sidewalk, street lights, striping and signing, paving, and any necessary transitions in accordance with the Ventura County Road Standards. The applicable Road Standard Plates are as follows: a. "C" Street, "D" A venue, "A" Court, and "B" Court to be constructed per Plate B-3D modified to have 40 feet pavement width and 50 feet right-of-way width. f. Maureen Lane to be constructed per Plate B-3D. The north side of Los Angeles A venue adjacent to the site iu oe \;um,u uctcd per Plate B-2A along property frontage. The applicant shall reimburse A.O.C. for A.O.C. -constructed improvements that would normally be required to be constructed. A meandering sidewalk shall be constructed along Los Angeles A venue, with the plans approved by the Director of Community Development. All cul-de-saces to be constructed per Plate C-3. All streets shall have a minimum of 4 inches of asphalt. Driveways to be constructed per Plate E-2 and to be 30 feet wide. 20 LDM-10 DP-397 -404 LAND DIVISION NO.: LDM-10 Siegel & Associates, Inc. APPLICANT: DATE: February 1, 1988 CITY ENGINEER'S CONDITIONS (Cont'd.) 14. The applicant shall demonstrate for each building pad to the satisfaction of the City of Moorpark as follows: a. Adequate protection from 100-year frequency storm; and b. Feasible access during a 10-year frequency storm. Hydrology calculations shall be per current Ventura County Standards. 15. The applicant shall deposit with the City of Moorpark a contribution for the Los Angeles A venue Improvement Area of Contribution. The actual deposit shall be the then current Los Angeles Avenue Improvement Area of Contribution applicable rate at the time the building permit is issued. 16. The applicant shall indicate in writing to the City of Moorpark, the disposition of any water well(s) and any other water that may exist within the site. If any wells are proposed to be abandoned, or if they are abandoned and have not been properly sealed, they must be destroyed per Ventura County Ordinance No. 2372. 17. The applicant shall submit to the City of Moorpark for review and approval, drainage plans, hydrologic, and hydraulic calculations prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer; shall enter into an agreement with the City of Moorpark to compiete the improvement and shall post sufficient surety guaranteeing the construction of the improvements. The drainage plans and calculations shall indicate the following conditions before and after development. Quantities of water, water flow rates, major water courses, drainage areas and patterns, diversions, collection systems. flood hazard area:,, :suJJlµS .:1ilu dra.ina.ge courses. Hydrology shall be per current Ventura County Standards except as follows: a. All sumps shall carry a 50-year frequency storm; b. All catch basins on continuous grade shall carry a 10-year storm; c. All catch basins in a sump condition shall be sized such that depth of water at intake shall equal depth of approach flows; d. All culverts shall carry a 100-year frequency storm; 21 Si dr io: s I\ e ii t t LDM-10 DP-397 -404 LAND DIVISION NO.: LDM-10 Siegel & Associates, Inc. APPLICANT: DATE: February l, 1988 CITY ENGINEER'S CONDITIONS (Cont'd.) e. Drainage facilities shall be provided such that surface flows are intercepted and contained prior to entering collector or secondary roadways; f. Under a 10-year frequency storm, all collector streets shall be provided with a minimum of one travel lane with a goal that local, residential streets shall have one travel lane available where possible. If a travel lane cannot be maintained as described in f. above, the storm drain will be extended and/or additional catch basins provided to satisfy this condition. 18. For any Final Map, or a Parcel Map (containing five or more parcels), or any Parcel Map whereupon dedications are required to be offered, the applicant shall transmit by certified mail a copy of the conditionally approved Tentative Map together with a copy of Section 66436 of the State Subdivision Map Act to each public entity or public utility that is an easement holder of record. Written compliance shall be submitted to the City of Moorpark. 19. If any of the improvements which the applicant is required to construct or install is to be constructed or installed upon land in which the applicant does not have title or interest sufficient for such purposes, the applicant shall do all of the following at least 60 days prior to the filing of the final or parcel map for approval pursuant to Government Code Section 66457. a. Notify the City of Moorpark (hereaf.er "City") in writing that the applicant wishes the City to acquire an interest in the land which is sufficient for such purposes as provided in Government Code Section 66462.5; b. Supply the City with (i) a legal description of the interest to be acquired, (ii) a map or diagram of the interest to be acquired suffi1;i1::ui. i.u sai:lsfy i},.,c; requirements of subdivision (e) of Section 1250.310 of the Code of Civil Procedure, (iii) a current appraisal report prepared by an appraiser approved by the City which expresses an opinion as to the current fair market value of the interest to be acquired, and (iv) a current Litigation Guarantee Report; c. Enter into an agreement with the City, guaranteed by such cash deposits or other security as the City may require, pursuant to whicl_i the applicant will pay all of the City's cost (including, without limitation, attorney's fees and overhead expenses) of acquiring such an interest in the land. 22 6\ LDM-10 "2.. DP-397 -404 LAND DIVISION NO.: LDM-10 Siegel & Associates, Inc. APPLICANT: DATE: February 1, 1988 CITY ENGINEER'S CONDITIONS (Cont'd.) 20. The applicant shall pay all energy costs associated with street lighting for a period of one year from the initial energizing of the street lights. The applicant shall execute a covenant running with the land on behalf of itself and its successors, heirs, and assigns agreeing to participate in the formation of an assessment district or other financing technique including, but not limited to, the payment of traffic mitigation fees, which the City may implement or adopt, to fund public street and traffic improvements directly or indirectly affected by the development. PRIOR TO RECORDATION, THE FOLLOWING CONDITION SHALL BE SATISFIED: 20A. Prior to recordation, Applicant shall reimburse the developer of LDM-8 (Annotti) for all direct construction expenses incurred in conjunction with construction of storm drain facilities along "D" Avenue within LDM-10. If necessary, the City Engineer will make the final determination of the reimbursable amount. IN CONJUNCTION WITH APPROVAL OF FINAL MAP, THE FOLLOWING CONDI- TIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED: 21. The applicant shall offer to dedicate on the Map to the City of Moorpark for public use, all the public streets right of way shown on the Map. 22. The applicant shall off er to dedicate on the Final (Parcel) Map to the City of Moorpark access easements over all private streets shown on the Final (Parcel) Map to provide access for all governmental agencies providing the public safety, health and welfare. 23. The applicant shall off er for dedication to the City of Moorpark a street easement of sufficient width along Los Angeles A venue to permit an ultimate ight of way of 59 feet, according to the applicable Ventura County Road Standard Plate B-2A, north of the centerline of Los Angeles A venue along the entire frontage of the parent parcel. 24. The applicant shall dedicate on the Final (Parcel) Map to the City of Moorpark the access rights adjacent to Los Angeles A venue along the entire frontage of the parent parcel except for approved access road(s) as delineated on the approved Tentative Maps. 23 LAND DIVISION NO.: APPLICANT: DATE: CITY ENGINEER'S CONDITIONS (Cont'd.) LDM-10 DP-397 -404 LDM-10 Siegel & Associates, Inc. February 1, 1988 25. That lot to lot drainage easements and secondary drainage easements shall be delineated on the final map. Assurance shall be provided to the City that these easements will be adequately maintained by property owners to safely convey storm water flows. DURING CONSTRUCTION, THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL APPLY: 26. That prior to any work being conducted within the State or City right of way, the applicant shall obtain an Encroachment Permit from the appropriate Agency. 27. If any hazardous waste is encountered during the construction of this project, all work shall be immediately stopped and the Ventura County Environmental Health Department, the Fire Department, the Sheriff's Department, and the City Inspector shall be notified immediately. Work shall not proceed until clearance has been issued by all of these agencies. 28. Where roads are to be built requring 4 or more inches of pavement, applicant shall construct the required street section minus 1-inch of paving as an interim condition until all utility cuts or trenching is completed. The final 1-inch cap of asphalt shall be placed after all necessary trenching is completed. 29. If grading is to take place during the rainy season, an erosion control plan shall be submitted for review and approval along with the grading plan. Along with the erosion control measures, hydroseeding of all graded slopes shall be required within 60 days of completion of grading. e 30. Condition No. 30 has been renumbered to Condition No. 31 A. 31. To assist the City Engineer in determining when a traffic signai shou1a oe insrnuea at the intersection of Los Angeles A venue with Maureen Lane, the developer shall conduct manual turning counts from 6:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. prior to the issuance of zone clearance for Development Projects corresponding to 40%, 65%, and 90% of the developable portion of the parent parcel. If this information is provided by other sources (City, Caltrans, or other developments) to the City Engineer's satisfaction, part or all of this condition may be waived by the City Engineer. 24 63 LAND DIVISION NO.: APPLICANT: DATE: CITY ENGINEER'S CONDITIONS (Cont'd.) LDM-10 DP-397 -404 LDM-10 Siegel & Associates, Inc. February l, 1988 PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY, THE FOLLOWING CONDffiON SHALL APPLY: 31A. "C" Street and "D" Avenue are to be completely constructed prior to zone clearance of 25% of the total developable land area within LDM-10, or by July 1, 1989, whichever occurs first. Regardless of the above time limits, "C" Street and "D" A venue are to be completed prior to occupancy of any lot taking access to "D" A venue or "C" Street, or prior to completion of the Maureen Lane Signal. VENTURA COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPARTMENT DURING CONSTRUCTION, THE FOLLOWING CONDITION SHALL BE SATISFIED: 32. Construction equipment, tools, etc., shall be properly secured during non-working hours. 33. That a six-foot chain link fence shall be erected around the construction site and locked during evening hours and on week-ends when no construction activity is present. 25 LDM-10 DP-397 -404 LAND DIVISION NO.: LDM-10 Siegel & Associates. Inc. APPLICANT: DATE: February 1, 1988 VENTURA COUNTY FIRE PROTECTION PRIOR TO APPROVAL OF FINAL MAP. THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED: 34. That prior to approval of the final map, the applicant shall provide to the Fire Department verification from the water purveyor that the purveyor can provide the required fire flow for the project. PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A BUILDING PERMIT, THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED: 35. That if the subject parcel is within a Water Purveyor District, water mains capable of providing a fireflow of 4500 GPM at 20 psi shall be installed from the public right of way or from the purveyor· point of connection to the street in front of each parcel. The cost of engineering, installation and maintenance of these mains shall be that of the applicant of this division (Parcel Map). This improvement or provisions to guarantee its installation shall be completed priro to recordation. Prior to combustible construction on any parcel, the water mains shall be extended to within 150 feet of the building site. A fire hydrant shall be installed at this location on the access road to the site and it shall be capable of providing the required fire flow. The owner of the combustible construction is responsible for the cost of this protection installation. DURlNG CONSTRUCTION, THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED: 36. That prior to combustible construction, all weather access road/driveway, suitable for use by a 20 ton fire department vehicle shall be installed. This improvement, or provisions to guarantee its installation shall be completed prior to recordation. 37. That the access road shall be of sufficient width to allow for a 40-foot turning radius at all sharp turns in the road. 38. That approved turn-around areas or easements for fire apparatus shall be provided where the access road is 150 feet or farther from the main thoroughfare. 39. That all drives shall have a minimum vertical clearance of 13 feet 6 inches (13' ~"). 40. That. street name signs shall be installed in conjunction with the road improvement. The type of sign shall be in accordance with Plate F-4 of Ventura County Road Standards. 26 LAND DIVISION NO.: APPLICANT: DATE: VENTURA COUNTY FIRE PROTECTION (Cont'd.) LDM-10 DP-397 -404 LDM-10 Siegel & Associates. Inc. February 1, 1988 41. That hydrants, when installed, shall be 6" x 4" x 4" x 2 1/2" level barrels. PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY, THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED: 42. That the road shall be named if serving more than five (5) five parcels. The street name(s) shall be submitted to the Fire Department Communication Dispatcher Supervisor for review prior to recordation. 27 LAND DIVISION NO.: APPLICANT: DATE: WATERWORKS DISTRICT CONDITIONS GENERAL REQUIREMENTS: LDM-10 DP-397 -404 LDM-10 Siegel & Associates, Inc. February 1, 1988 43. All projects shall comply with the District's Rules and Regulations including existing or subsequently adopted waste discharge ordinances, policies or procedures. PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A BUILDING PERMIT, THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED: 44. That the District be allowed to review the adequacy and level of service for each project when tenant improvements are requested. Additional facilities, onsite treatment, or other modifications may be required as a condition of certain tenant improvements. 28 fol LDM-10 DP-397 -404 LAND DIVISION NO.: LDM-10 Siegel & Associates, Inc. APPLICANT: DATE: February 1, 1988 CAL TRANS CONDITIONS -45. PRIOR TO ZONING CLEARANCE, THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED: Prior to zone clearance, Developer shall make a supplementary contribution to the Los angeles Avenue Area of Contribution in the amount of $70,000, representing half of the estimated project costs to construct a traffic signal at the intersection of Maureen Lane at Los Angeles Avenue and to perform such reasonable necessary traffic studies as may be required by the City Engineer. 29 LDM-10 DP-397 -404 LAND DIVISION NO.: LDM-10 Siegel & Associates, Inc. APPLICANT: DATE: February 1, 1988 VENTURA COUNTY ENVIRONMENT AL HEALTH DIVISION CONDmONS PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A ZONING CLEARANCE, THE FOLLOWING CONDI- TIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED: 46. Prior to issuance of a zone clearance for the inauguration of any use in the proposed structures, such use shall be reviewed and approved by the Ventura County Environmental Health Division. PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY, THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED: 47. The applicant shall ensure that the volume of hazardous waste will be reduced or eliminated by undertaking the following: a. Alter processes to eliminate or reduce the amount of hazardous waste generated. b. Develop a waste exchange program. c. Recycle the waste. d. Construct or install on-site hazardous waste treatment facilities. 48. The applicant shall ensure that groundwater pollution and other environmental damage will be avoided by undertaking the following: a. Install and maintain proper containment. b. Comply with all hazardous waste generator laws for storage, handling, transportation and disposal. 30 CITY.OF MOORPARK PLANNING COMMISSION MEMORANDUM·_. • SECTJON 1: GENERAL INFORMATION I: A. HEARIN(; DATE: March 7, 1988 D, CASE NO.: DP-393 -396 'lo B. l-lEA'RlNG TIME: 7:00 p,m. E.-STAFF CONT ACT: Duane Morita Sanchez Talarico A!isociales, Inc. • C. BEARING LOCATION: City Council Chamber, City Hall 799 Moorpark A venue Moorpark, California G. REQUESTED ACTION: t. Approv~l 0f Resolution F. APPLICANT; c/o Moorpark -Los Angeles Siegel & As~ociate~, lnc 5 ivi LIO\.lgia!; ri1 ~U..tl.1 Calabasas. CA 91302. o Sw~taining • recommendation to the City Council to approve the · .rvtitigated Negative Deciaration and • sustaining· reco111n\endation that, the City .. -. Council cer·tify that. the inform'::i.tiori was corisidered .on decisions relate.d 'to the projects;. :ind, 2. Approval of Resolution ___ _ o . Sustaining recommendation to· the City Council to approve Deyelop-. . ment Plan. Perni'its {DP-393 ~ 396) for four (4). Separate industrial. structures of 105,J08 s.f.. (total) located in area planned for industrial µse . . JI.. PROJECT SUMMARY/LOCATipN: The application will allow construction of four separate industrial structures on a rectangular shaped vacant pared of lnnd aooroximatel"' 224_ 770 ~ f. (S_ I ::icrPs) in si'le. Total building area is 10), 108 s.f. w i.Jc us.:.,ct for office, ~-.,~:--eho1..1,"'. nnrl mc11rnf3cturing activities in the following breakdown 11,676 s.f. of office; 31,482 s.f. of warehouse; and 61,950 s.f. of manufacturing. 'The location of the project area is shown on page 1 of the Planning Commission Staff Report. J. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTJONS .FROM FEBRUARY 1, 1988 )>llBLIC HEARING These requested actions are continued from the_ Febr·uary I, 1-988 Planning Commission meeting. The Planning Commission defe,:red action on approval of DP-393 --396 due to • zoning inconsistencies associated with DP-397 -404 which· occur across Maureen Lane to 'the e~st. Pl~ase refer to the attached· 'Staff Rep~rt whtch was prepared for. that meeting for a1l reference materiaL DP-393 -~ 396 has not been revised. since February t. 19&&. CITY=OF MOORPARK PLANNING.COMMISSION •· STAFF REPORT SECTION I: GENERAL. INFORMATION DP-393 -396 A. HEARING DATE: February l, 1988 · D. • CASE NO.: DP-393 -396 B. HEARING TIME: • 7:00 p.m. C. HEARING LOCATION: City Council Chamber, City Hall 799 Moorpark A venue Moorpark, California G. REQUESTED ACTION: 1. Approval of Resolution --~ E. STAFF CONTACT: Duane Morita Sanchez Talarico Associates, Inc. F. APPLICANT: c/o Moorpark -Los Angeles Siegel & .Associates, Inc. 5101 Douglas Fir Road Calabasas, CA 91302 o Recommending . to the City Council approval of the Mitigated Negative Decla"ration and • recommending that the. City Co~nc.ail certify the i11formaticm was consider_ed on decisions relate_d to the project; and, 2. Approval of Resolution· ___ _, o Recommending to the CitY Council approval of Development Plan . Permits (DP,-393 -396) for .four (4) separate industrial structures of 105,108 s.f. • (total) located in area planned for industrial use.· H. PROJECT LOCATION: Westside of Maureen Lane north of Los Angeles A venue. 5 DP-393-396 (J) )> z ~ ,... m (J) )> < m z C m PROJECT LOCATION DP-393-398 I. PROCESSING EXPIRATION DATE: July l, 1988 71 DP-393 -396 SECTION II: SUMMARY A. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: 1. Staff recommends that the Planning Commission open the public hearing, take testimony from all those wishing to give testimony, and approve Resolution Nos. and ___ , recommending that the· City. Council approve the Mitigated Negative Declaration and Development Plan Permits DP-393 -396 subject to the conditions as stated in Section IV. B. ALTERNATIVE PLANNING COMMISSION ACTIONS: i. Open the ruoiic, nearing; ciose lne ruoiic nearing; approve Kesomuons J'IOS. and ___ ; recommending that the City Council accept the Mitigated Negative Declaration and certify . that the information was considered on decisions related to the project; • and, recommending that the City Council approve or modify and approve Development Plan Permits (DP-393 -396) • as recommended by staff; 2. Find that it -has reyiewed and considered the ~roject Findings attached to this Staff Report. Find that·-based upon the staff .report and :testimony presented at this public hearing that the • Commission recommend that the City Council deny approval of Development Plan Permits· op.:.393 -• 396. • -or- 3. If the applicant concurs, continue to a date specified with direction to staff and applicant, as related to project issues.·. C. P~OJECT SUMMARY: DP 393 -396 are located on the westside of Maureen Lane north of Los Angeles Avenue. Regional access is provided to the site primarily along State Highway 118 (Simi Valley -San Fernando Freeway) from the northeast, State Highway 23 (Moorpark Freeway) from the east and Los Angeles A venue from the south. Direct site access is provided off of Maureen Lane. Access to the site is from two 30-foot concrete driveways. The application will allow construction of four separate industrial structures on a rectangular shaped· vacant parcel of land approximately 224,770 s.f. (5.1 acres) in size. Total. building area is 105,108 s.f. to be used for. office, warehouse, and manufacturing •· activities in the following breakdown 11,676 s.f of office; 31,482 s.f of warehouse; and 61,950 s.f. of manufacturing .. I 72. DP-393 -396 There will be a total of 265 parking spaces provided onsite. / 3 The four industrial ·structures ate· .located within an area designated for-industrial use.s located within the western portion of •• the· City • of" Moorpark. The General Plan designation for the site is medium industrial; zoning is M-2. D. ISSUES: Based upon a review of .·the proposed project. the issues identified related to the project include: 0 0 0 0 Traffic Air Quality Visual Resources Flood Hazard Noise It is the opinion of the staff that conditions of approval on the project and mitigation measures identified in the Mitigated Negative Deciaration will alleviate the issues identified above (Refer to Section III for further .discussion) . . / 2 74 SECTION Ill: • ANALYSIS A. PROPOSED PROJEC'J:: · The proposed project will allow the construction of four seperate industrial structures. The total building area will be 105,108 s.f. It wiff be used for industrial uses in the following breakdown: DP-393 -8,414 s.f. of office area; 31,482 s.f. of warehouse area (total -39,896 s.f.) DP-394 -1,162 s.f. of office area; 19,138 s.f. of manufacture area (total -20,300 s.f.) DP-395 -784 s.f. of office area; 19,216 s.f. of manufacture area (totai -20,00u s.f.) DP-396 -1,316 s.f. of office area; 23,596 s.f. of manufacture area (total -24,912 s.f.) DP.;;393 is located on the c9rner of Los Angeles Avenue and Maureen Lane;· op.:.394 is located along Maureen Lane, north of DP-393; DP-395 is .also located along Maureen · . Lane~ north of DP-.394; and DP-396 is located along Maureen Lan:e·, north. of DP-,395. The four structures occur· on two lots; ; lot line adjustment is required to consolidate the two lots into one lot, as a condition of approval. It is estimated .that ± 270 people would be employed at the DP-393 -396 sites after the structures are completely leased. Hours of operation are anticipated to be from 6:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. DP-393 has 26-foot tilt-up ·textured co~crete ·walls; painted off-white .• DP-393 will be a two-story structure. • Bonded bronze paneled doors and ivory colored aluminum mullion with bronze tint tempered glass will be provided. DP-394 has 2~-foot tilt-up textured concrete walls, painted light gray. DP-394 will be a one-story structure. Gray tinted tempered glass with charcoal aluminum mullion will be provided. Dark gray accent trim will be painted at top edge of building and light aqua accent will be painted along the building's exterior walls just above the doors' and windows' edge. DP-395 has 20-foot tilt-up textured concrete walls, painted light gray. DP-395 will be a one-story structure. Gray tinted tempered glass with charcoal anodized aluminum mullion will be provided. Dark gray accent trim will be painted at top edge of building and light aqua accent will be painted· along the' building's exterior walls just above the doors' and windows' edge. 3 DP-393 -396 DP-396 has 20-foot ti.It-up textured concrete walls, painted off.,;.white. DP-396 will be a one-story structure. Gray tinted temper~d glass with . bronze anodized aluminum mullion wJll .. ~ provided.· Dark gtay accieqt trim· will _be painted at top edge of building. • A. diagonai 'accent. strip ot vatyi~g. shades • of gray will ~lso be painted on • the • southern wall. Highest point of roof line will be I 8 inches below the top of parapet for each structure. Outside building materials are on file with the City of Moorpark and will be displayed at the Planning Commission hearing. B. EXISTING CONDITIONS: The four industrial structures are located within an arel:l designated for industrial . uses in the western portion: of the City of Moorpark. The General Plan designation for the site is Medium Industrial; zoning is M-2. The area for the four structures is currently vacant. The site has been cleared and is currently level and primarily devoid of onsite trees or topographic features. Existing surrounding land· uses and structures include .an industrial building to the north; •. a . residential • dwelling and . equipment storage . to the south; a light industrial . building to • the· east; and another industrial building to the· west. The General Plan designation for the surrounding areas is Medium Industrial to the north, east, .and west and Low Density Residential to the south. Zoning is M-'2 to the north, east, and west and Single-Family Residential Zoning to the south. Regional access is provided· fo the site primarily along State Highway 118 (Simi Valley • -San Fernando Freeway) from _the northeast, State Highway 23 (Moorpark Freeway) ·. from·. the east and Los Artgeles • Aven'!le .from the south. Direct site access is provided • off of Maureen Lane. Acces~ to the site is from two 30-foot concrete driveways. Public utilities and facilities existing near the project site include: Drainage Facilities: 24-inch RCP with concrete catch basin located near west boundary. Water Supply: IO-inch ACP pipe with water meter along Maureen Lane. Sanitation Facilities: 8-inch VCP private sewer with 6-inch laterals to west boundary of property. Easements: 15-foot utility easement along west boundary; 15-foot access easement along west boundary. 4 75 Fire Protection: DP-393 -396 7 lo IO-inch water main with 6-incti lateral with 2 -4-inch and I - 2 1/2-inch n.s: outlets. C .. PROJECT HISTORY:-. Zone Change No. 307S On October 28, 1975, the· County of Ventura adopted M-2 zoning for area bordered by Poi_ndexter Avenue to the north, Los Angeles A venue to the south, Gabbert Road to the west, and Maureen Lane to the east.-· The four proposed industrial structures occur on lots 24 and 25 which are part of this area. Parcel Map No. 3192 l>r1nr t.-. n~.-~mh.n, 10~!' -·--· ~-----------, ----, - ----•.J subdivided area that was rezoned. The M-2 zone was established by the adoption of Ordinance No. 3075 on October 28, 1975 by the County . . D. CONFORMANCE WITH EXISTING CITY POLICIES AND GUIDELINES: The proposed structures are in conformance -with the existing Moorpark Community Plan Land Use Element of the City of Moorpark General Plan. The industrially- oriented policies applicabl_e; to the-proposed structures include the following: o "Policy 2: To • encourage industrfal • development to adopt a harmonious architectural style with appropriate landscaping and buffer areas." The structures are proposed in an l:irchitectural style and color palette consistent with other • proposed industrial structures in the._ Los • Angeles Avenue/Maureen Lane · area. The • proposed landscaping exceeds . the required. city , landscape _ standards_ ·ror the area.. The landscaping contributes to the aesthetically pleasing quality of the area. o "Policy 5: In order to discourage strip industrial development, future 0 industrial facilities should be in the form of industrial parks." The proposed structures are part of a proposed industrial park. The four industrial structures are part of twelve total industrial structures proposed in the area. Implementation of the structures would not result in strip industrial development. "Policy 6: which are the general To establish sites for appropriate industrial uses in locations harmonious with adjoining land uses, and which do not degrade physical environment of Moorpark." The proposed structures are surrounded on the north, west, and east by planned industrial uses as designated by the City's General Plan. 5 DP-393 -396 The structures will be· developed such that . no detrimental effects . will occur: The proposed structures· are generally in conformance with the Moorpark Zoning Ordinance as shown in Table l. E. AGENCY REVIEW: Departments which reviewed DP-393 -396 include the City Engineer, County Fire Department, County Flood Control District, County Sheriff's Department, County Waterworks, Caltrans, County • Environmental Health, Air Pollution Control District, and Moorpark Unified School District. _. m, vuy vvu1111uuuy J.Jcvciuµ1ht1H Deµarilntnt, City Ei1~ii1ecr, '--uuuty Fire u1;:pa1 Lu11;:ut, Caltrans, County Sheriff's Department, County Environmental Health, and Air Pollution Control District have submitted conditions for approval of DP-393 -396. They are attached to this staff report. With the attached conditions, the proposed projects would meet all planning require- ments for development. F. • ENVIRONMENTAL SIGNIFICANCE: Traffic: A traffic report was completed on November 5, 1987 by Thomas S. Montgomery & • Associates to determine . potentia_l traffic impacts associated with the four 1ndustrial structures being proposed. The complete traffic report is attached to this staff report, and is summarized below: The traffic report discussed important arterials. and study intersections. Arterials include . Los • Angeles A venue and Maureen Lane. Los Angeles A venue, State Route 118 (SR 118), is the major east-west route bisecting the City of Moorpark. This important arterial now carries between 18,000 and 22,000 vehicle trips per day (vpd) in the vicinity of the project area and has a roadway varying from a minimum of one lane in each direction to a cross se<?tion now striped for seven lanes. Maureen Lane, a two lane collector street, is non stop sign controlled at Los Angeles A venue and has one approach lane in each direction.. Los Angeles A venue at Maureen Lane has one approach lane for eastbound traffic and one approach lane plus a separate left-turn-only lane for westbound traffic. Study intersections include Los Angeles A venue and Tierra Rej?da Road-Gabbert Road; Los Angeles Avenue and Moorpark Avenue; and Los Angeles Avenue and Spring Road. The intersection of Los Angeles Avenue and Tierra Rejada Road-Gabbert Road is now controlled by a traffic signal. The intersection of Los Angeles A venue and Moorpark A venue is controlled with an actuated traffic signal with separate left turn phasing for 6 11 CITY REQUIREMENTS l. Setbacks: Building• setback fro11 Loa Angel•• Avenue. Front: 30 fHt Side; 20 feet 2. Height: ?-0 feet 111axi11um 3. Parking: 4. Off-St~e•t Loading Zone 5. Landscaping 6. Minimum Lot Area: 10,000 a.f. 7. Site Coverage: No require• ment. ~ Front: 30 feet from Los Angeles Avenue Side: 20 feet fro11 Maureen Lane 26 feet 54'spaces required. 58 spaces provided (including one handi· capped stall) 2 semi-truck spaces required. 2 semi-truck &paceo provided. 3,700 &.f. required. 19,166 s.f. provided. 73,988 s.f. 42.51 WLLl bP-393 -396 CONFORMANCE VITU KOOllPAIU:: ZONING ORDINANCE R.t:lli Side: 2.0. feet from Mauree.n Lane 21 feet 43 spaces required. 59 spaces provided (including one handi- capped stall) l semi•truck apace required. 1 semi-truck space provided. 2.425 s.f. required. 5,958 s.f. provided. 48,485 s.f. 421 ll.Llil Side: 20 f~et from Maureen Lane 20 feet 42 spaces required. 66 spaces provided (including one handi· capped stall) l semi-truck space required. l semi-truck space provi1ed. 2,367 s.f. required. 5,120 s.f. provided. 47,330 s.f. 42. 21 ~ Side: 20 feet fro11 Maureen. Lane_ 20 feat 53 spaces required.· 73 spaces provided-. (including o.ne handi• capped stall) l'semi-truck space required. l semi-truck space provided. 2,749 s.f. required. 5,425 s.f. provided. 54,967 s.f. 45.31 _J cj) DP-393 -396 east • and westbound traffic • plus "split . phasing" • for north and southbound approach traffic.· · The westbound right-turn, green arrow operates in conjunction with the : southbound signal phase: · ·The in.tersectio.n • of L6s" Angeles A venue and Spring Road is controlled with an actuated traffic signal with separate left turn phasing for east and westbound approach traffic. The street system in the vicinity . of the project area is operating at relatively high levels of service except at the intersection of Los Angeles ·Avenue and Spring Road. This intersection is operating well in excess of design capacity in the afternoon peak travel period. The additional traffic that would be generated by the four industrial structures vehicles (about 735 per day) is relatively low and would not change the existing street system volume/capacity relationships to a significant degree except at Los Angeles A venue and Maureen Lane in the afternoon peak period. It should be noted that the completion of the connection of the Moorpark (SR 23) and Simi Valley-San Fernando" (SR 118) Freeways, anticipated to occur in the mid-l 990's, will drastically alter traffic flow patterns in and through the City of Moorpark and may significantly improve traffic flow along the concerned portion of Los Angeles A venue. The traffic study indicated that additional mitigation measures would not further reduce adverse impacts to any ~ignificant degree. Existing volume/capacity relationships and levels of service are presented for each study intersection in Table 2. I~ summary, the results indicate that the intersection of Los Angeles A ven'ue and Moorpark A venue is now· operating· at relatively high levels of service during the morning and afternoon commuter peak travel periods and that the intersection of Los Angeles Avenue and Tierra Rejada Road-Gabbert Road is currently operating at acceptable levels of service during both commuter peak travel periods. However, the • intersection of Los Angeles A venue and Maureen Lane is operating slightly in excess of the design capacity value during the afternoon commuter peak travel period due primarily to the relatively heavy wes_tbound through traffic demands that are currently confined to one travel lane. The intersectio11 of Los Angeles A venue . ~d • Spring Road· is .presently operating well • in excess of design capacity du~ing both commuter peak travel periods. 7 79 DP-393 -396 TABLE 2 .EXISTING VOLUME/CAPACITY. RELATIONSHIPS/LEVELS. QF SERVICE·· Study Intersection Los Angeles Avenue & Spring Road Los Angeles Avenue & Moorpark Avenue Los Angeles Avenue & Maureen Lane Los Angeies Avenue, 11erra KeJ808 Road/Gabbert Road l~/LEVEL OF SERVICE Morning Peak Hour Period 0.86/0 0.49/A o.n1c 0.77/C Afternoon Peak Hour Period 0.95/E 0.63/B 0.81/0 0.74/C *Intersection Capacity Utilization method estimates current operational efficiency. Source:· Traffic lq:>act Study; prepared by Thomas S. Montgomery & Associates; Refer to Section IV, Part D. It is estimated t.hat DP-393 -396 would generate about 735 ~pd with maximum direc- tional peak demands between 76 and 79 vehicle trips per .hour (vph) inbound in the morning peak period and outbound in the afternoon peak period~ respectively. Table 3 presents number of additional vehicle trips generated by DP-393 -396. Time Period AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Daily Total In out In out TABLE 3 SITE TRAFFIC GENERATION Nurber of Additional Vehicle Trips 76 22 25 79 735 Source: Traffic lq:>act Study; prepared by Thomas s. Montgomery & Associ· ates; Refer to Section IV, Part D. 8 Total future cumulative ·traffic. demands would consist of op.;.393 -396 generated tl'af fic plus the . additi~nal traffic that . w~uld : be generated by (?ther known • planned developments in the study area plus future background traffic demands. It was determined ·that the. intersection of Moorpark A venue and· Los Angeles A venue would continue to operate at relatively high levels· of service during both commuter peak travel periods. Without any additional intersection capacity improvements, all other study area intersections would be operating in excess of design capacity during on or both peak periods. Traffic signal and intersection geometric design improvements will be required at all study intersections. Even with the foregoing improvements, the traffic study indicated that two of the five study intersections (Los Angeles/Spring and Los Angeles/Tierra Rejada-Gabbert) would be operating in excess of design capacity. It should be noted that a fifteen (15) lot industrial subdivision (LDM-8) abuts the j:i,v.:;v;,c~ ~I:;~.~-~;, LV LUv "'""'· ~::::;l.1-l(; ~;, ilu:; }JllljJU$cu 1c::-:,uuuiv1;,.iuu ui' ihrt::t:: (3) existing industrial zoned lots into twenty-six (26) industrial lots. As a condition to its approval, LDM-8 connects Maureen Lane with Goldman Avenue, which parallels Maur- een Lane to the east. LDM-10 and LDM-8 are similar in that the subdivisions are small lots. Maureen Lane will be subject to traffic flows from DP-393 -396; LDM-8; and LDM-10, including DP-397 -404. Total future traffic ·demands at the intersection of Los Angeles A venue and Maureen Lane • niay warrant the installation of· a traffic. signal control. Air Quality; Traffic trips associated with operation of the four industrial facilities will contribute to . cumulative air quality impacts in the vicinity. Once operational, the facility would employ approximately 270 people in a single shift from 6:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m., Monday through Friday. It is estimated that_ DP-393 -396 would generate about 735 vpd (Table 3). The air quality in this region is generally good. This project, in conjunction with other past, present and reasonably foreseeable future projects would incrementally contribute to a degradation of air quality. This impact is not considered a significant impact. All Ventura County Air Pollution Control District (APCD) regulations will be implemented into the project to help lessen cumulative air quality impacts from the project. Visual Resources: The structures comply with existing City standards on lot coverage and building height and will provide landscaping well in excess of City requirements. The color pallete for the structures are consistent with other industrial buildings occurring in the City. The primary issue associated with visual resources· relates to potential views of the proposed four industrial structures from residents located south and motorists travelling on Los Angeles A venue. The sites are currently vacant. Adjacent to the sites are other existing and proposed industrial buildings. After construction of the four 9 DP-393 -396 8 2._ structures, views from Los Angeles A venue will be of four structures varying in height from 20 to 26 feet. Extensive landscaping and trees will be provided along Los Angeles A venue and Maureen Lane which will screen southern views of the structures. The industrial structures are located within an area designated for industrial use. Residents and motorists south of the site would be subject to views of four structures rather than to views of a cleared and otherwise undeveloped portion of the City. Roof equipment of the four structures may also be visible. Equipment could include vents, air conditioners, and possible heaters. The applicant is however, subject to a condition of approval to provide screening of this roof equipment. The screening would be composed of materials similar to the structure, and would be subject to the approval of the Director of Community Development. Compliance with applicable conditions will eliminate/reduce most visual concerns. It is i1:..e opir1ion of City staff that, subject to the conditions of apprv·"·a!, L!-1~ have provided methods to reduce visual impacts to the extent feasible. Light and Glare: Similar to visual resources DP-393 -396 may result in incre~cs in light and glare in the evening and nighttime hours. The sites are currently vacant. The proposed structures would provide illumination to parking areas. These lights could be visible from residential neighborhoods to the south and Los Angeles A venue motorists. Skylights would be provided in the roof of the structure to enhance interior natural lighting, as required by Title 24. These skylights may be visible during nighttime hours if the interior of the structure is illuminated. These skylights would incrementally add to overall nighttime visibility of the structure. The overall potential light and glare impact is not considered significant. The sites are located within an area designated for industrial uses that would be illuminated during the nighttime hours. The proposed structures would incrementally add to this lighting. Extensive landscaping along the southern periphery of the sites fronting Los Angeles A venue would reduce the amount of light and glare from the sites. The structures would be required to provide lighting fixtures with shields that are directed downward and skylights that are as opaque as feasible which will also reduce glare emitted to Los Angeles A venue. Flood Hazard: DP-393 is located in Zone C, Areas of minimal flooding according to the Federal Emergency Management Agency Flood Insurance Rate Map. DP-394 -396 encroach into Zone B, Areas between limits of the 100-year flood zone and 500-year flood or certain areas subject to 100-year flooding. The applicant is required to conform with the provisions of Ordinance 42, relating to floodplain and the conditions of approval of the City Engineer. DP-393 -396 ~ The proposed industrial uses will result in automobile and truck traffic and the operation of equipment. Auto traffic will primarily occur from employees coming and going to work, lunch, and errands. Truck traffic will be the result of distribution of manufactured goods, and deliveries to and from the site. Mechanical equipment associated with manufacturing may be in operation some, or all, of most days. The traffic and equipment will result in increased noise throughout each day. The noise generated at the sites would be perceived primarily by adjacent users within the industrial area and is not considered a significant impact. Residents south of the sites may be impacted by noise. DP-393, which is the structure directly adjacent to Los Angeles A venue will not have any manufacturing activities occurring on site, which will minimize noise generation, therefore, reducing impact to residents. 1 ne proposea suuctures are aurn,;1pated io re:rnit in im.:n:H1eruai 11u1:s1:: itvd:s 111 ihc: general vicinity. G. STAFF ANALYSIS General Plan/Zonine Consistency DP-393 -396 are consistent with the Moorpark General Plan Land Use Element and for the goals and policies designated for industrial uses. The sites are designated for industrial use on the General Plan. The proposed industrial structures would infill vacant parcels in an existing industrial area that is currently preplanned for such a use. In addition, the projects will be consistent with the Moorpark Zoning Ordinance (Refer to Table I). The site is zoned M-2, for industrial use. Environmental Concerns The projects would not result in significant environmental concerns. Potential environmental issues related to traffic, air quality, visual resources, light and glare, and flood hazard are not considered significant, or can be reduced to a level of insignifi- cance. All appropriate mitigation measures have been included as suggested Conditions of Approval (Section IV). Parkin2/Landscapine Requirements DP-393 -396 provide parking spaces and landscaping in excess of City requirements. 192 total spaces are required; the projects will provide a wtal of 256 spaces. 11,241 s.f. of total landscaping is required; the projects will provide a total of 35,669 s.f. Shading of parking area are consistent with County of Ventura and City of Moorpark Guidelines. Existing municipal services can be provided to the site without causing the need for additional facilities. 11 DP-393 -396 Public Opposition As of approval this Staff Report, there is no known opposition to DP-393 -396. Since the projects are proposed in an area preplanned for such development, and since the area is already developing in these uses, significant opposition to DP-393 -396 are not currently anticipated. Staff recommends that the Planning Commission: l. Open the Public Hearing; 2. Close the Public Hearing; 3. Recommend that the City Council accept the Mitigated Negative Declaration for DP-393 -396; 4. Certify that the information contained in the Negative Declaration was considered on decisions related to the project; 5. Recommend that the City Council approve DP-3~3 -396. Prepared by: Duane Morita, Contract Planner Sanchez Talarico Associates, Inc. 12 Approved by: Patrick J. Richards Director of Community Development City of Moorpark 84 SECTION IV: ATTACHMENTS A. FINDINGS I. Mitigated Negative Declaration 2. DP-393 -396 B. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL I. Community Development 2. City Engineer 3. City Police 4. Ventura County Fire Protection 5. Ventura County U1v1s10n rouuuon 1...,u11uu1 1..11:,u11.L 6. Waterworks District 7. Cal trans 8. Ventura County Environmental Health C. RESOLUTIONS 1. Mitigated negative Declaration 2. Approval of DP-393 -396 D. TRAFFIC REPORT (Prepared by Thomas Montgomery and Asscciates) E. INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION 13 DP-393 -396 a~ A. FINDINGS l. Mitigated Negative Declaration 2. DP-393 -396 14 DP-393 -396 8.f, 1. Mitigated Negative Declaration: FINDINGS FOR DP-393 -396 FEBRUARY 1, 1988 DP-393 -396 a 7 a. That the Initial Study is complete and has been prepared in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the State CEQA Guidelines and City Policy. b. That the contents of the Initial Study have been considered in the various decisions of these projects. c. That in order to reduce adverse impacts of the proposed projects, all feasible mitigation measures discussed in the environmental document have been incorpor- ated into the proposed projects. Specific economic, social or other considerations make feasible any other potential mitigation measures to the proposed projects. 2. DP-393 -396: a. The proposed uses would be consistent with the purpose, intent, guidelines, standards, policies and provisions of the City's General Plan and Chapters l and 2 of the Ordinance Code; b. The proposed uses would not impair the integrity and character of the zone m which they are to be located; c. The proposed uses would be compatible with land uses permitted within the General Plan land use designations and the zones in the general area where the uses are to be located; d. The proposed uses would not be obnoxious or harmful or impair the utility of the property itself or neighboring property or uses; e. The proposed uses would not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience or welfare; f. The proposed projects, together with the prov1S1ons for its design and improvement, is consistent with the General Plan. The proposed projects are compatible with the objectives policies, general land uses and programs specified in the General Plan. g. The Planning Commission has considered the effect of its action upon the housing needs of the region and has balanced these needs against the public service needs of its residents and available fiscal and environmental resources. 15 DP-393 -396 88 B. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 1. Community Development 2. City Engineer 3. Ventura County Sheriff 4. Ventura County Fire Protection 5. Ventura County Division Pollution Control District 6. Waterworks District 7. Caltrans 8. Ventura County Environmental Health 16 DEVELOPMENT PLAN PERMIT NO.: DP-393 -396 ec, DP-393 -396 APPLICANT: Siegel & Associates, Inc. DATE: February l, 1988 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CONDITIONS GENERAL REQUIREMENTS: l. That permits are granted for the land and projects on the submitted plot plans and elevations. That the location and design of all site improvements shall be as shown on the approved plot plans and elevations. 2. That unless the projects are inaugurated (building foundation slab in place and substantial work in progress) not later than one (l) year after these permits are granted, these permits shall automaricaiiy expirt:: uu Lhat date. The Director cf Community Development may, at his discretion, grant up to one (l) additional year extension from project inauguration if there have been no changes in the adjacent areas and if permittee can document that he has diligently worked toward inauguration or projects during the initial one-year period. 3. That any minor changes may be approved by the Director of Community Develop- ment upon the filing of a Minor Modification application, and the passing before the Planning Commission prior to the appeal period ending. Any Major Modifica- tion is to be approved by the City Council. 4. That the design, maintenance and operation of the permit areas and facilities thereon shall comply with all applicable requirements and enactments of Federai, State, and County and City authorities, and all such requirements and enactments shall, by reference, become conditions of these permits. 5. That no conditions of these entitlements shall be interpreted as permitting or requiring any violation of law or any unlawful rules or regulations or orders of an authorized governmental· agency. In instances where more than one set of rules apply, the stricter ones shall take precedence. 6. That if any of the conditions or limitations of these development plans are held to be invalid, that holding shall not invalidate any of the remaining corrditions or limitations set forth. 7. That the permittees agree as a condition of issuance and use of these permits to defend, at his sole expense, any action brought against the City because of issuance (or renewal) of these permits or in the alternative to relinquish these permits. Permittees will reimburse the City for any court cost which the City may be required by court to pay as a result of any such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate in the defense of any such action, but such participation shall not relieve permittees of his obligation under this condition. 17 DEVELOPMENT PLAN PERMIT NO.: APPLICANT: DATE: DP-393 -396 DP-393 -396 Siegel & Associates, Inc. February I, 1988 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CONDITIONS (Cont'd.) 8. That permittees' acceptance of these permits and/or opera:ion under these permits shall be deemed to be acceptance by permittee of all conditions of these permits. 9. That the developments are subject to all applicable regulations of the (Limited Industrial) zone and all agencies of the State of California, County of Ventura, City of Moorpark, and any other governmental entities. PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A ZONING CLEARANCE, THE FOLLOWING CONDI- ,.. .. ~ ... ,..,__.,,..,.....,,.....,_ ' -• -~ • • • • = ----·--------_..:._ __ -_.:...:.._~ i 0. That the applicant wiii apply for a lot line adjustment prior to zone clearance to consolidate lots 24 and 25 into one lot. 11. That prior to construction for each project, a zone dearance sh~ll te obtai:1ed from the Department of Community Development and a building permit shall be obtained for each project from the Building and Safety Division. 12. That prior to the issuance of a zone clearance, a landscaping and planting plan (3 sets), together with specifications and maintenance program, prepared by a State licensed landscape architect in accordance with County Guidelines for Landscape Pian Check, shaii be submitted to the Director of Community Development for review and approval. The applicant shall bear the total cost of such review and of final installation inspection. The landscaping and planting plan shall be accompanied by a fee specified by the City of Moorpark. All landscaping and planting shall be accomplished and approved by the Director of Community Development prior to the issuance of any occupancy permit for DP-393 -396. 13. That the final landscape plans for each project shall provide for a 50% shade coverage within all parking areas. Shade coverage is described as the maximum mid-day shaded area defined by a selected specimen tree at 50% maturity. Landscaping and irrigation shall be provided to the curb adjacent. 14. That all turf plantings associated with these projects shall be drought tolerant, low-water using variety. Plantings in and adjacent to parking in vehicular area shall be contained within raised planters surrounded by 6" high concrete curbs. 15. Landscaping shall not obscure any exterior door or window from street view. 16. Landscaping at entrances/exits or at any intersection within the parking lot ~hall not block or screen the view of a seated driver from another moving vehicle or pedestrian. 18 '3o DEVELOPMENT PLAN PERMIT NO.: DP-393 -396 91 DP-393 -396 APPLICANT: Siegel & Associates, Inc. DATE: February l, 1988 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CONDITIONS (Cont'd.) 17. Landscaping (trees) shall not be placed directly under any overhead lighting which could cause a loss of light at ground level. 18. That all roof mounted equipment (vents, stacks, blowers, air conditioning equipment) that may extend above any parapet wall shall be enclosed on all four sides by view obscuring material. Prior to the issuance of a zone clearance, the final design of the roof screening and location of any roof mounted equipment of the projects must be approved by the Director of Community Development. 19. That all trash disposal areas shall be provided in a location which will not interfere with circulation, parking or access to the building and shall be screened with a six-(6) foot high, solid wall enclosure with metal gates, final design of said enclosure shall be subject to the approval of the Director of Community Develop- ment prior to the issuance of zone clearance. 20. That signs are subject to the Moorpark Code, Chapter 50, Title 9, Sign Ordinance. A sign permit is required. No building signs of any type shall be allowed on any building wall or window. Only a monument sign shall be permitted for these development plan and sHall not exceed 30 square feet, no higher than 5 feet above average ground level. A sign program shall be submitted and approved by the Director of Community Development for all signage. 2 I. Roof design and construction for each project shall include a minimum 18" (inch) extension of the parapet wall above the highest point of the roof. 22. Prior to issuance of a zoning clearance, the final working drawings shall be submitted to the Director of Community Development for review and approval. 23. For all exterior lighting, a lighting plan shall be prepared by an electrical engineer registered in the State of California and submitted to the Department of Community Development for review and approval prior to the issuance of a zone clearance. The lighting plan shall achieve the following objectives: A void interference with reasonable use of adjoining properties; minimize to the greatest extent possible on-site glare; provide adequate on-site lighting; limit electroliers height to avoid excessive illumination; provide lighting structures which are compatible with the total design of the proposed facility. 19 DP-393 -396 DEVELOPMENT PLAN PERMIT NO.: DP-393 -396 Siegel & Associates, Inc. APPLICANT: DATE: February l, 1988 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CONDITIONS (Cont'd.) These plans include the following: a. A photometric plan showing a point by point foot candle layout to extend a minimum twenty-(20) feet outside the property lines. Layout plan to be based on a ten-(10) foot grid center. b. Maximum overall height of pole fixtures shall be not more than fourteen (14) feet. Existing pole fixtures shall be reduced to fourteen (14) feet. c. Fixtures must have sharp cut-off qualities at property lines. d. There shall be no more than a seven to one (7: I) ratio of level of illumination shown. (Maximum to minimum ratio between Lighting Standards.) e. Low pressure energy efficient light fixtures shall be used. f. Average maximum of one-half candle illumination. I 24. Pullover parking (overhangs) shall be limited to 24 inches maximum. 25. Prior to the issuance of a zone clearance for each project the developer shall show evidence of a recorded covenant to hold as a single parcel lots 24 and 25 of Ventura County Assessors Off ice Book 511, page 62. 26. That the applicant shall construct a utility room with common access to house all meters. No exterior ladders shall be permitted. 27. The applicant shall, prior to the issuance of a zone clearance for each project, execute a covenant running with the land on behalf of itself and its successors, heirs and assigns agreeing to participate in the formation of and be subject to any assessment district or other financing technique including but not limited to the payment of traffic mitigation fees, which the City may implement or adopt, to fund public street and traffic improvements directly or indirectly affected by the development. Traffic mitigation fees shall be used for projects such as, but not limited to, the extension of New Los Angeles A venue. 28. That the final design of site improvements for each project, including materials and colors, is subject to the approval of the Planning Commission. 20 92... DEVELOPMENT PLAN PERMIT NO.: APPLICANT: DATE: DP-393 -396 9 3 DP-393 -396 Siegel & Associates, Inc. February l, 1988 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CONDITIONS (Cont'd.) 29. That the applicant shall provide a five (5) foot wide meandering sidewalk along Los Angeles Area and shall provide landscaping and trees along Los Angeles A venue to the satisfaction of the Director of Community Development. 30. Prior to zone clearance the applicant shall have approval of the Director of Community Development to provide skylights that are as opaque as feasible to minimize potential evening illumination as viewed from the exterior. 31. That no asbestos pipe or construction materials shall b<' lJSPd fr;,-th!" nrn ;ortc entitlement without prior approval of the City Council. PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A BUILDING PERMIT, THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED: 32. That prior to the issuance of a building permit the developer shall pay all school assessment fees levied by the Moorpark Unified School District. 33. An "Unconditional Will Serve" letter for water and sewer service shall be obtained from Ventura County Waterworks District No. l or that the applicant shall have satisfied all requirements of the Ventura County Waterworks District No. 1 for annexation and wili be provided with both water and sewer of provided temporary water service from Camrosa Water District to the satisfaction of the County Water Works District. DURING CONSTRUCTION, THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED: 34. That all utilities shall be underground to the nearest off -site utility pole except through transmission lin~s. 35. That all parking shall be surfaced with asphalt or concrete and shall include adequate provisions for drainage, striping and appropriate wheel blocks or curbs in parking areas. 36. That at the time water service connection is made for each project, cross connection control devices shall be installed on the water system in accordance with the requirements of the Ventura County Environmental Health Department. 21 DEVELOPMENT PLAN PERMIT NO.: APPLICANT: DATE: DP-393 -396 DP-393 -396 Siegel & Associates, Inc. February I, 1988 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CONDITIONS (Cont'd.) PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY, THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED: 37. That prior to the occupancy or change of occupancy or introduction of an additional occupancy of these buildings by the tenants, either the owner or prospective tenant shall apply for the use of these buildings. The purpose of the zoning clearance shall determine if the proposed uses are compatible with the existing zoning and terms and conditions of these permits. 38. That no later than ten (10) days after any change of property owner or of lessee(s) or operator(s) of the subject uses, there shall be filed with the Director of Community Development the name(s) and address(es) of the new owner(s) lessee(s) or operator(s), together with a letter from any such person(s), acknowledging and agreeing to comply with all conditions of these permits prior to zone clearance. 39. Prior to occupancy by any tenant or subsequent owner that would employ or dispose of hazardous waste or materials, a Major Modification shall be processed and filed. 40. All roof top mechanical equipment and other noise generation sources onsite be attenuated to 55 dBA at the property line. That prior to the issuance of the certificate of occupancy the applicant shall submit a report to demonstrate to the satisfaction of the Director of Community Development that all onsite noise generation sources have been mitigated to this level. The report shall be prepared by a licensed acoustical engineer in accordance with accepted engineering standards. AFTER ISSUANCE OF A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY, THE FOLLOWING CON- DITIONS SHALL BE APPLICABLE: 41. That the continued maintenance of the permit area and facilities shall be subject to periodic inspection by the City. The permittee shall be required to remedy any defects in ground maintenance, as indicated by Code Enforcement Officer within thirty (30) days after notification. 42. No outside storage of any materials or overnight simi-trucks or truck trailers, beyond the loading bays, of any kind shall be permitted after occupancy. 22 94 DEVELOPMENT PLAN PERMIT NO.: APPLICANT: DATE: DP-393 -396 DP-393 -396 Siegel & Associates, Inc. February l, 1988 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CONDITIONS (Cont'd.) 43. No repair or maintenance of trucks or any vehicle shall occur on the subject site. 44. Loading and unloading operations shall not be conducted between the hours of 10:00 p.m. and 6:00 a.m. 23 DEVELOPMENT PLAN PERMIT NO.: DP-393 -396 9 b DP-393 -396 APPLICANT: Siegel & Associates, Inc. DATE: February I, 1988 CITY ENGINEER'S CONDITIONS PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A ZONING CLEARANCE, THE FOLLOWING CONDI- TIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED: 45. The applicant shall submit to the City of Moorpark for review and approval, a grading plan prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer; shall obtain a Grading Permit; and shall post sufficient surety guaranteeing completion. 46. The applicant shall submit to the City of Moorpark for review and approval, a Jetaiicu S0il5 Rcp01 t ce1 tific:J by a rngistered p,ofessional Civil I:ngincu ;n the State of California. The grading plan shall incorporate the recommendation of the approved Soils Report. 47. The applicant shall submit to the City of Moorpark for review and approval, street improvement plans prepared by Registered Civil Engineer; shall enter into an agreement with the City of Moorpark to complete the improvements; and shall post sufficient surety guaranteeing the construction of the improvements. The improvements shall include concrete curb and gutter, sidewalk, street lights, striping and signing, paving, and any necessary transitions in accordance with the Ventura County Road Standards. The applicable Road Standard Plates are as follows: a. A meandering sidewalk shall be constructed along Los Angeles A venue, with the plans approved by the Director of Community Development. b. Driveways to be constructed per Plate E-2 and to be 30 feet wide. 48. The applicant shall demonstrate for each building pad to the satisfaction of the City of Moorpark as follows: a. Adequate protection from 100-year frnquency storm; and b. Feasible access during a I 0-year frequency storm. Hydrology calculations shall be per current Ventura County Standards. 49. The applicant shall indicate in writing to the City of Moorpark, the disposition of any water well(s) and any other water that may exist within the site. If any wells are proposed to be abandoned, or if they are abandoned and have not been properly sealed, they must be destroyed per Ventura County Ordinance No. 2372. 24 DP-393 -396 DEVELOPMENT PLAN PERMIT NO.: DP-393 -396 Siegel & Associates, Inc. APPLICANT: DATE: February l, 1988 CITY ENGINEER'S CONDITIONS (Cont'd.) 50. The applicant shall submit to the City of Moorpark for review and approval, drainage plans, hydrologic, and hydraulic calculations prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer; shall enter into an agreement with the City of Moorpark to complete the improvement and shall post sufficient surety guaranteeing the construction of the improvements. The drainage plans and calculations shall indicate the following conditions before and after development. Quantities of water, water flow rates, major water courses. drainal?e areas and patterns, diversions, collection systems, flood hazard areas, sumps and drainage courses. Hydrology shall be per current Ventura County Standards except as follows: a. All sumps sha!l carry a 50-year frequency storm; b. All catch basins on continuous grade shall carry a IO-year storm; c. All catch basins in a sump condition shall be sized such that depth of water at intake shall equal depth of approach flows; d. All culverts shall carry a 1090-year frequency storm; e. Drainage facilities shall be provided such that surface flows are intercepted and contained prior to entering collector or secondary roadways; f. Under a IO-year frequency storm, all collector streets shall be provided with a minimum of one· travel land with a goal that local, residential streets shall have one travel land available where possible. All stormwater flows shall be picked up at the existing catch basins located adjacent to the west property line. g. The applicant shall pay all energy costs associated with street lighting for a period of one year from the initial energizing of the street lights. h. The applicant shall have prepared a geotechnical investigation with regard to liquifaction. Per the City's safety element, this report shall be prepared by a Registered Professi0nal Civil Engineer or Geologist. 25 DEVELOPMENT PLAN PERMIT NO.: DP-393 -396 DP-393 -396 Siegel & Associates, Inc. APPLICANT: DATE: February 1, 1988 CITY ENGINEER'S CONDITIONS (Cont'd.) 1. The applicant shall execute a covenant running with the land on behalf of itself and its successors, heirs, and assigns agreeing to participate in the formation of an assessment district or other financing technique including, but not limited to, the payment of traffic mitigation fees, which the City may implement or adopt, to fund public street and traffic improvements directly or indirectly affected by the development. J. The applicant shall offer to dedicate the City of Moorpark access easements over all private streets shown on the Tentative Map to provide access for all governmental agencies providing the public safety, health and welfare. k. That lot to lot drainage easements and secondary drainage easements shall be delineated on the grading plan. Assurance shall be provided to the City that these easements "Will be adeq1Jately m~intained by !)roperty owners to safely convey storm water flows. DURING CONSTRUCTION, THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL APPLY: 51. That prior to any work being conducted within the State or City right of way, the applicant shall obtain an Encroachment Permit from the appropriate Agency. 52. If any hazardous waste is encountered during the construction of this project, all work shall be immediately stopped and the Ventura County Environmental Health Department, the Fire Department, the Sheriff's Department, and the City Inspector shall be notified immediately. Work shall not proceed until clearance has been issued by all of these agencies. 53. If grading is to take plao:e during the rainy season, an erosion control plan shall be submitted for review arid approval along with the grading plan. Along with the erosion control measures hydroseeding of all graded slopes shall be required within 60 days of completion of grading. 26 DEVELOPMENT PLAN PERMIT NO.: DP-393 -396 ~ DP-393 -396 APPLICANT: Siegel & Associates, Inc. DATE: February l, l 988 VENTURA COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS DURING CONSTRUCTION, THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL APPLY: 54. A licensed security guard is required during the construction phase, or a 6-foot high chain fence shall be erected around the construction site. 55. Construction equipment, tools, etc., shall be properly secured during non-working hours. 56. -· --- VJ..I .. J.J..14.I."""\.'-' UJ.&) VJ.J.V VJ.J. \.J..I...., b ... V U.J.J.\..4-J. J. VJ..1.J. tampering with them. All parking areas shall be provided with a lighting system capable of illumination the parking surface with a minimum of I-foot candle of light and shall be designed to minimize the spillage of light onto adjacent properties. All exterior lighting devices shall be protected by weather and breakage-resistant covers. 57. Landscaping at entrancesiexits or at any intersection with the parking lot shall not block or screen the view of a seated driver from another moving vehicle or pedestrian. 58. Landscaping (trees) shall not be placed directly under any overhead lighting which could cause a loss of light at ground level. 59. All exterior doors shall be constructed of solid wood core a minimum of 1 and 3/4-inches thick or of metal construction. Front glass door(s) commonly used for entry are acceptable but should be visible to the street. 60. Doors utilizing a cylinder lock shall have a mm1mum five (5) pin tumbler operation with the locking bar or bolt extending into the receiving guide a minimum of l inch. PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED: 61. Address shall be clearly' visible to approaching emergency vehicles and mounted against a contrasting color. 62. Address numbers shall be a minimum of 6 inches in height and illuminated during the hours of darkness. 63. There shall not be any easy exterior access to the roof area, i.e., ladders, trees, high walls, etc. 27 DEVELOPMENT PLAN PERMIT NO.: DP-393 -396 DP-393 -396 Siegel & Associates, Inc. APPLICANT: DATE: February 1, 1988 VENTURA COUNTY FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT CONDITIONS PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF ZONING CLEARANCE, THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED: 64. That building plans of public assembly areas, which have an occupant load of 50 or more, shall be submitted to the Ventura County Bureau of Fire Prevention for review. ....... ,...-........... '1UI..UHJ.QU\,,, sp,ir.kler system, p!ans shall be submitted, with payment for plan check, to the Ventura County Bureau of Fire Prevention for review. 66. That any structure greater than 5,000 square feet in area and/or 5 miles from a fire station shall be provided with an automatic fire sprinkler system in accordance with Ventura County Ordinance #14. DURING CONSTRUCTION, THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED: 67. That a width of 25 feet shall be provided for all streets and driveways. 68. That access roads shall be installed with an all weather surface, suitable for access by fire department apparatus. 69. That all drives shall have a minimum vertical clearance of 13 feet, 6 inches (13' 6"). 70. That the access roadway• shall be extended to within 150 feet of all portions of the exterior walls of the first story of any building. Where the access roadway cannot be provided, approved fire protection system or systems shall be installed as required and acceptable to the Bureau of Fire Prevention. 71. That prior to construction, the applicant shall submit plans to the Ventura County Bureau of Fire Prevention for approval of the location of fire hydrants. Show existing hydrants on plan within 300 feet of the development. 72. That fire hydrants shall be installed and in service prior to combustible construction and shall conform to the minimum standards of the County Water Works Manual. a. Each hydrant shall be a 6-inch wet barrel design and shall have one 4-inch and two 2 1/2-inch outlet(s). 28 DP-393 -396 DEVELOPMENT PLAN PERMIT NO.: DP-393 -396 Siegel & Associates, Inc. APPLICANT: DATE: February I, 1988 VENTURA COUNTY FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT CONDITIONS (Cont'd.) 73. b. The required fire flow shall be achieved at no less than 20 psi residual pressure. c. Fire hydrants shall be spaced 300 feet on center, and so located that no structure will be farther than 150 feet from any one hydrant. d. Fire hydrants shall be recessed in from curb face 24-inches at center. 'T'l-.. ... ♦ .I.J..&fo,4f. halon or dry chemical) shall be submitted to the Ventura County Bureau of Fire Prevention for review to insure proper installation. PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A BUILDING PERMIT, THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED: 74. That the minimum fire flow required is determined by the type of building construction, proximity to other structures, fire walls, and fire protection devices provided, as specified by the I.S.O. Guide for Determining Required Fire Flow. Given the present plans and information, the required fire flow is approximately 2000 gallons per minute. The applicant shall verify that the water purveyor can provide the required quantity at the project. PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY, THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED: 75. That all grass or brush exposing any structures shall be cleared for a distance of 100 feet prior to framing, according to the Ventura County Weed Abatement Ordinance. 76. That address numbers, a minimum of 6 inches high, shall be installed prior to occupancy, shall be of contrasting color to the background; and shall be readily visible at night. Where structures are setback more than 250 feet from the street, larger numbers will be required so that they are distinguishable from the street, the address number(s) shall be posted adjacent to the driveway entrance. 77. That a plan shall be submitted to the Ventura County Bureau of Fire Prevention for review indicating the method in which buildings are to be identified by address numbers. 78. That fire extinguishers shall be installed in accordance with National Fire Protection Association, Pamphlet # 10. The placement of extinguishers shall be reviewed by the Fire Prevention Bureau. 29 lo I DEVELOPMENT PLAN PERMIT NO.: APPLICANT: DATE: DP-393 -396 DP-393 -396 Siegel & Associates, Inc. February 1, 1988 VENTURA COUNTY AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT CONDITIONS PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A BUILDING PERMIT, THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED: 79. The District shall be notified at the time of original occupancy and each time there is a change in occupancy of tenants leasing space from the projects so the District may review activities and materials to be warehoused or manufactured. 30 DEVELOPMENT PLAN PERMIT NO.: APPLICANT: DATE: WATERWORKS DISTRICT CONDITIONS GENERAL REQUIREMENTS: DP-393 -396 DP-393 -396 Siegel & Associates, Inc. February l, 1988 80. All future tenants shall comply with the District's Rules and Regulations including existing or subsequently adopted waste discharge ordinances, policies or procedures. PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A BUILDING PERMIT, THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED: 81. That the District be allowed to review the adequacy and level of service for each project when tenant improvements are requested. Additional facilities, onsite treatment, or other modifications may be required as a condition of certain tenant improvements. 31 103 DEVELOPMENT PLAN PERMIT NO.: APPLICANT: DATE: CAL TRANS CONDITIONS DP-393 -396 DP-393 -396 Siegel & Associates, Inc. February l, 1988 PRIOR TO ZONING CLEARANCE, THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED: 82. Prior to zone clearance, Developer shall make a supplementary contribution to the Los Angeles A venue Area of Contribution in the amount of $65,000, representing half of the estimated project costs to construct a traffic signal at the intersection of Maureen Lane at Los Angeles Avenue. When the City Engineer and Caltrans determine that traffic signal warrants are satisfied the City will proceed with c0n<:trurtion of the si~nal, with funding to consist of 50% regular AOC funds and 50% Developer's supplementary AOC contribution. 32 DP-393 -396 DEVELOPMENT PLAN PERMIT NO.: DP-393 -396 Siegel & Associates, Inc. APPLICANT: DATE: February l, 1988 VENTURA COUNTY ENVIRONMENT AL HEAL TH DIVISION CONDITIONS PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A ZONING CLEARANCE, THE FOLLOWING CONDI- TIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED: 83. Prior to issuance of a zone clearance for the inauguration of any use in the proposed structures, such use shall be reviewed and approved by the Ventura County Environmental Health Division. PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY, THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED: 84. The applicant shall ensure that the volume of hazardous waste will be reduced or eliminated by undertaking the following: a. Alter processes to eliminate or reduce the amount of hazardous waste generated. b. Develop a waste exthange program. c. Recycle the waste. d. Construct or install on-site hazardous waste treatment facilities. 85. The applicant shall ensure that groundwater pollution and other environmental damage will be avoided by undertaking the following: a. Install and maintain proper containment. b. Comply with all hazardous waste generator laws for storage, handling, transportation and disposal. 33 DP-393 -396 l CJ 6 C. RESOLUTIONS 1. Mitigated Negative Declaration 2. Approval of DP-393 -396 34 DP-393 -396 lOl D. TRAFFIC REPORT 35 DP-393 -396 \ DB E. INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION 36 CITY OF l'X...Ul<PAJ<.K DEPAR'IMENT OF CCM-1UNITY DEVELOPHENf 799 1-'U)RPARK AVENUE r-,::DRPARK, CALIFORNIA 93021 f. PROJECT DESCHlPTlUN: NEGATIVE DECLARATION -X-MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION 1. Entitlerrent; Developmen~ Permit 393 396 2. A.~plicant; Siegel and Associates, Inc. J • Proposal; Four ( 4) separate industrial bqi 1 di ugs with a total floor area of l_Q_S_,_108 s. f. Buildings with have office, warehojlse, and manufacturin uses 4. Location_and Parcel Nunber(s): Sll-062-04/Sll-062-05/511-062-06 Buildings located on westside of Maureen lane north of Ins Ange]es Avenue. 5. Hes pons ible Agencies: City of Moorpark II. ::;T,'\TE-1E!'r!' O!=' ENVI~N'T'AT. F'TNDI!"-X":Sc An initial study was conducted by the Departnent of Comnunity Develoµrent to evaluate the potential effects of this project upon the enviroment. Based upon the findings contained in the attached _initial study it has been detennined that this project could, could not, have a significant effect upon the environrrent. MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION ONLY: These potentially significant inpacts can be satisfactorily mitigated through adoption of the following identified rreasures as conditions of approval. MITIGATION MEASURES IN:LUDED 1D AVOID POTENTIALLY SIGN!FICANI' EFFECTS: ( IF A.PPL I CABLE) See Attached III. PUBLIC REVIEW: 1. Legal Notice Method; Direct rrailing to property owners within 300 feet. 2. Docurrent Posting Period; -W'/tr,o/ilf} ~ ,/, Approved by, ~'5{\;(Date) 71/S!J -(Narre--)-------(Da-te_) ___ _ Duane A. Morita Contract Planner Sanchez Talarico Assoc. Patrick J. Richards Director of Community Development City of Moorpark NOTICE OF PREPARATION OF DRAFT NEGATIVE DECLARATION TO CONCERN PARTIES: The City of Moorpark is currently processing the following land \ l 0 use permit request. California State Law requires that an evaluation be conducted to determine if this project could significantly affect the environment. Based upon an initial review, it has been found that a significant affect would not occur; therefore, a Negative Declaration has been prepared. PROJECT DESCRIPTION Entitlement: Development Permit 393-396 Applicants Name: Siegel and Associates, Inc. Parcel Size: 224,770 s.f. (total) Assessors Parcel No. (s): 511-062-04/Sll-062-05/511-062-06 Zoning Designation: M-2 General Plan Designation: 1-1 Project Location: Buildings located on westside of Maureen Lane north of Los Angeles Avenue. Description of Land Use That Would Result If Permit Is Approved: Four(4) separate industrial buildings with a total floor area of 105,108 s.f. Buildings will have office, warehouse, and manufacturing uses. The public review period for the draft Negative Declaration is from January 20. 1988 to February 4, 1988 I you have any questions or comments regarding the project or adequacy of the draft Negative Declaration, please call or write, Patrick Richards Director .Community Development 799 Moorpark Avenue, Moorpark, CA. 93021, (805) 529-6864. Copies of this draft Negative Declaration may be reviewed or purchased at the above address. im~=~~ar:....+-.4by ~~_Date : (,// / i ?J Du~~ n-=- Contract Planner I . BACKGROUND 1. Name of Applicant CITY OF MOORPARK INITIAL STUDY CHECKLIST FORM Sie~el and Associates, Inc. 2. Project Description Four (4) separate industrial buildings with a total floor area of 105,108 s.f. Buildings will have office, warehouse, and 3. Date of Checklist submittal January 20, 1988 4. Project Location Buildings located on westside of Maureen Lane north of Los Angeles Averrue. II. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS l \ \ (Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required on attached sheets.) , ..L. "I.' A 'D'T'U .L..Cl..L\...t...1..1.. Will the proposal result in: a. Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic substructures? b. Disruptions, displacements, compaction or overcovering of the soil? c. Change in topography or ground surface relief features? d. The destruction, covering or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? e. Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils, either on or off the site? f. Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands, or changes in situation, deposition or erosion which may modify the channel of a'river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? g. Exposure of people or property to geologic hazards such as earthquakes, landslides, mud- slides, ground failure, or similar hazards? YES MAYBE NO X _x_ J.. ..x _x_ 2. AIR. Will the proposal result in: a. Substantial air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? b. The creation of objectionable odors? c. Alteration of air movement, moisture or temperature, or any change in climate, either locally or regionally? d. Is there a potential for cumulative adverse impacts on air quality in the project area? 3 .. WATER. Will the proposal result in: a. Changes in currents, or the course of direction of water movements, in either marine or fresh waters? b. Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface runoff? c. Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? d. rn~ng~ ;n the amount of surface water in. any water body? e. Discharge into surface waters, or in any alteration of surface water quality, including but not limited to temperature, di~solved oxygen or turbidity? f. Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground waters? g. Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? h. Degradation of ground water quality? i. Substantial reduction in the amount of water otherwise available for public water supplies? j. Exposure of people or property to water related hazards such as flooding or tidal waves? YES MAYBE X X x NO X X _x _x X _x_ X l \ z... 4. PLANT LIFE. Will the proposal result in: a. Changes in the diversity of species or number of any species of plants (including trees, shrubs, grass, crops, and aquatic plants? b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of plants? c. Introduction of new species of plants into an area, or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing species? J:\.eJuct.i.0,1 agricultural cror? 5. ANIMAL LIFE. Will the proposal result in: a. Change in the diversity of species or numbers of any species of animals (birds, land animals including reptiles, fish and shellfish, benthic organisms or insects)? b. Restrict the range of or otherwise affect any rare or endangered animal species? c. Introduction of new species of animals into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of animals? d. Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? 6. NOISE. Will the proposal result in: a. Increases in existing noise levels? b. Exposure of people to severe noise levels? 7 .• LIGHT AND GLARE. Will the proposal produce new light or glare? 8. LAND USE. Will the proposal result in a substantial alteration of the present or planned land use of an area? 9. NATURAL RESOURCES. Will the proposal result in: a. Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? b. Substantial depletion of any nonrenewable resource? \\3 YES MAYBE NO _x_ _x_ X _x_ _x_ 10. RISK OF UPSET. Will the proposal involve: a. A risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to, oil, pesticides, chemicals or radiation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions? 11. POPULATION. Will the proposal alter the location, distribution, density or growth rate of the human population of an area? 12. HOUSING. Will the proposal affect existing housing, or create a demand for additional housing? 13. TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION. Will the proposal result in: a. Generation of substantial additional vehicular movement? b. Effects on existing parking facilities or demand for new parking? c. Substantial impact upon existing transportation systems? d. Alterations to present patterns of rirr11l~rion or movement of people and/or goods? e. Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? f. Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? 14. PUBLIC SERVICES. Will the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered govenunental servies in any of the following areas: a. Fire protection? b. Police protecticin? c. Schools? d. Parks or other recreational facilities? e. Other governmental services? 15. ENERGY. Will the proposal result in: a. Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? YES MAYBE X X X _x_ X X NO _x_ _x _x_ X X _x_ __x_ ...x_ b. Substantial increase in demand upon existing sources of energy or require the development of new sources of energy? 16. UTILITIES. Will the proposal result in a need for new systems, or substantial alterations to the following utilities: 17. a. Power or natural gas? b. Communications system? c. Water? d. Sewer or septic tanks? e. Storm water drainage? f. Solid waste and disposal? g. Street lighting annexation and/or improvements? HUMAN HEALTH. Will the proposal result in: a. Creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding mental health)? b. Exposure of people to potential health hazards? 18. AESTHETICS. Will the proposal result in the obstruc- tion of any scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public view? 19. RECREATION. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities? 20. ARCHAEOLOGICAL/HISTORICAL. Will the proposal: a. Affect possible unknown archaeological or historic- al sites? b. Result in destruction or alteration of a known archaeological or historical site within the vicinity of the project? c. Result in destruction or alteration of a known archaeological or historical site near the vicinity of the project? \\5 YES MAYBE NO X X - X X A. X X X _x_ _x_ _x YES MAYBE 21. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE. a. Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal corrnnunity, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? b. Does the project have the potential to achieve short-term, to the disadvantage of long-term, environmental goals? (A short-term impact on the environment is one which occurs in a relatively brief, definitive period of time while long-term impacts will endure well into the future.) c. Does the project have impacts which are individu- ally limited, but cumulatively considerable? {A project may impact on two or more separate resources where impact on ea.h resource is relatively small, but where the effect of the total of those impacts on the environment is significant.) d. Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly. III. RECOMMENDATION On the basis of this initial evaluation: X In conformance with Section 15060 of the State EIR Guidelines, I find with certainity that the proposal would not have a significant impact on the environment. I find the proposed project is categorically exempt pursuant to class I find the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION. should be prepared. _x_ I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached NO _x_ sheet could be applied to the project. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION SHOULD BE PREPARED. \\6 I find proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. I find proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ADDENDUM to an existing certified Environmental Impact Report is required. I find the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and this effect is adequately addressed in a certified Environmental Impact Report, and thus SUBSEQUENT USE of the existing EIR is required. INITIAL STUDY RESPONSES DP 393-396 \\8 The following section di~cusses the yes, maybe, and no responses given in the Initial Study prepared for the proposed DP-393 -396 projects. l.a. A limited amount of grading would be required due to the flat topography of the sites. Construction of these structures would not result in unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic substructures. l.b. T!>en.• is the possihili_ty 0f cornpactinn; di~rurH0n, ~~,.., ,,, __ Tp,~(''Tc.,..._ ing of soils due to grading operations associated with the pro- posed projects. All grading is anticipated to be balanced onsite. All grading will be done in accordance with approved City stan- dards. Grading is not anticipated to adversely impact the pro- jects. l.c. l.d. l.e. 1. f. l.g. The project sites are flat, with no visible ground surface relief features. Minor modifications to the earth surface may occur related to landscaping and drainage. No major alterations to the topography are anticipated to occur. There are no known unique geologic or physical features onsite. The proposed projects would not result in the-destruction, cover- ing, or modification of unique features. During construction of the proposed structures, only a limited amount (1,200 cubic yards) of grading is anticipated to occur. There would not be a substantial increase in wind or water erosion of soils due to necessary earth movement. In that no beach sands, rivers, streams, oceans, or bays exist onsite, the proposed structures would not result in changes to any of these features. No geologic or seismic hazards are known to exist onsite or within the immediate vicinity. The proposed structures would not result in exposure of people or property to geologic or seismic hazards. 2.a. The proposed •,structures would not emit significant amounts of pollutants. Some emissions due to increased vehicular traffic will occur. Levels will be minimal, since increased vehicular traffic will not be extensive. The structures would not result in substantial air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality. 2.b. In that the proposed structures would not emit significant amounts of pollutants, objectionable odors would not be created. 2.c. 2. d. .) . a. 3.b. 3.c. 3.d. 3.e. 3. f. 3.g. \ \9 The proposed structures consist of construction of approximately 105,108 s.f. of office, warehouse, and manufacturing. It would not result in an alteration of air movement, moisture, or tempera- ture or any change in climate, either locally or regionally. The structures are part of an industrial park area. The proposed projects are not expected to create cumulative adverse impacts on air quality in the project area due to the relatively non- pollutant nature of the projects. However, the additional employ- ment base will result in additional traffic to the City of Moor- park. Mitigation measures have been incorporated into the project which will mitigate this cumulative impact to the extent feasible. 1'40 marine or rresn waLers are presenL uns1.Le. The; pi.upu::.,:,u .;,trcl(,- tures would not result in the change in currents or the course of direction of such water bodies. The proposed structures represents a change in land use from vacant land to approximately 45% lot co·.rerage. This may result in a change in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface runoff. Adequate flood control is provided by the drainage fa:cility which borders western edge of the sites. Concrete catch basins and an underground drain to Flood Control Channel will provide protection changes. The proposed projects would not alter the of flood water. Ventura County from adverse course or flow The proposed projects would not alter the course or flow of flood water. Concrete catch basins and an underground drain to Ventura County Flood Control will provide protection from adverse changes. All excess onsite water would be diverted to existing storm drains to the Flood Control Channel. The proposed projects would not result in discharge to surface waters, or in any alteration of surface water, quality, including but not limited to temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity. The construction and operation of the proposed projects would not alter the direction or rate of flow of any known groundwaters. Water is provided by the Ventura County Waterworks District No. l; no wells would be constructed. No aquifers are located onsite. The proposed projects would obtain water from the Ventura County Waterworks District No. 1. The projects would not change the quantity of groundwater either through direct additions or with- drawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excava- tions. \2o I 3.h. The proposed projects would obtain water from the Ventura County 3. i. Waterworks District No. 1. The projects would be served by exist- ing 10" water mains in Maureen Lane. The proposed projects would not result in in the amount of water otherwise available quate capacity and water pressure exist additional constraints for fire protection a substantial reduction for public use. Ade- to serve the sites. No are known to exist. 3.j. The proposed projects are served by the Ventura County Flood Con- trol District (VCFCD). The VCFCD provides adequate service to the sites. No flood hazards are anticipated as a result of the pro- posed projects. 4.a. No trees would be removed with implementation of the projects. 4.b. The projects would not change the diversity of species or number of any species of plants. There are no known unique, rare, or endangered species Therefore, the projects would not result in the reduction of these types of species. onsite. of any 4.c. The proposed structures include the introduction of new plant species to be utilized for landscaping. The proposed structures would not present a barrier to the normal replenishment of onsite vegetation. 4.d. No crops currently exist onsite. The proposed projects would not result in the reduction in acreage of any agricultural crops. 5.a. No species of animals are known to exist onsite other than, pos- sibly, rodents and reptiles. No rare or endangered species are known to exist onsite. Therefore, the proposed projects would not change the dive,rsity of species or numbers of any species of ani- mals. 5.b. No rare or endangered species are known to exist onsite. There- fore, the proposed projects would not restrict the range of, or otherwise affec~, these species. 5.c. Introduction of animal species is not proposed with these pro- jects. No animal species are known to exist onsite. The proposed projects would not introduce new animal species or result in a barrier to the migration of movement of animals. 5.d. There are no known existing fish or wildlife habitats onsite. Therefore, the ,proposed projects would not deteriorate these habi- tats. 6.a. 6.b. 7. 8. 9.b. 10. 11. 12. Warehousing and office activities are typically passive. No sig- nificant increase in existing noise levels is anticipated. Increase in existing noise levels due to manufacturing could be lessened through proper installation of facilities and through muffling of large machinery. Warehousing, manufacturing, and office activities within the pro- . posed facilities would not exceed surrounding noise levels. Therefore, the proposed projects would not result in exposure of people to severe noise levels. The sites are currently vacant and have no onsite lighting. The proposed projects would introduce lighting associated with parking areas and illumination of the new facilities. Mitigation has been proposed which reduces this impact to the extent feasible. The sites are currently planned as part of an industrial park area. The existing surrounding uses include, primarily, agricul- tural uses. Future uses·include other.office, manufacturing, and. warehousing facilities .. The projects would, therefore, result in .an alteration_o'f existing land use, but ·is consistent with the planned industrial land use of the area. 'l'he . proposed projects •. would . not • be. utilizing any • natural resources. Therefore, the· proposed projects would not result in an increase in ,the rate of use of any natural resources. The proposedp~~jects would not use substantial or· nonrenewable re.sources. Therefore, the proposed projects would not result in a substant:i,al depletion of these resources . • The new developments are not expected to create a. risk of upset in the project sites due to the relatively non-hazardous nature of· the projects. The proposed projects would employ ±270 employees. This could possibly alter the location, distribution, density, or growth rate of the human population in the area including relocation for employment of the employee and family. The proposed projects would employ ±270 employees. This could possibly affect existing housing, or create a demand for addi- tional housing. The demand is anticipated to be associated locally by the amount of residential construction presently in process. 13 ;~. ; The average ·dafly• trips asso.ciated with employ~e traffic and-truck traffic created by. the proposed facilities will generate addi- tional vehicular movement. The street system in the vicinity is presently operating at relatively high levels of service. Addi- tional traffic due to the projects will not significantly adversely impact the area's street system. Alternative means of transportation will-be encouraged to reduce vehicle trips. Increased traffic will warrant the installation of a traffic sig- nal control at the corner of Los Angeles Avenue and Maureen Lane. 13.b. The proposed projects would construct 272 parking spaces to pro- vide for employee and truck parking onsite. This parking would meet City requirements. The proposed projects would not result in 13.c. 13:d. 13.e. 13. f. 14.a. 14.b. 14.c. Any new development in the City of Moorpark will have some impact on the present transportation system. The street system is_ pres- ently operating at relatively· high levels. of service; consequently, additional traffic may substantially impact existing transportation systems. Mitigation to reduce this impact to a level of insignificance has been proposed and is .attached for review. tn that all roads to and-from· the projects have already· _been built, the proposed projects woul.d not result _ in alter.ations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and/or goods. Therewould be no waterborne, rail, or air traffic associated-with the proposed projects. Therefore, the proposed projects would not alter these_ typ'es of traffic. The proposed p'roj ects would minimally increase the amount of automobile and truck traffic in the area. It could present an increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists, or pedestrians. Effective use of setbacks and sight distance crite- ria will minimi~e potential hazards. The addition oJ new buildings with ±270 employees would not require the need for additional fire protection personnel in the area. The addition .of new buildings with ±270 employees would not require the need for· additional police protection personnel in the area. The probable influx of people (as employees) associated with the proposed projects would not require the need for new schools in the area. 14,d. 15.a. 15 .b. lU.a. J 6. b. 16.c. 16.d. 16.e. 16.f. 16.g. 17.a. \23 The· probabie infl~ of people (as' employees)· associated with the proposed projects would not necessitate the development of new parks or other. recreational facilities. The proposed projects, with 105,108 s.f. of office, manufacturing, and warehouse uses, would not result in the use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy. The proposed projects, with 105,108 s.f. of office, manufacturing, and warehouse uses, would not require a substantial increase in demand upon existing sources of energy or require the development of new sources of energy. TI1~ pLopu~~u pLoJ~cts with, 105,108 s.f. of office, manufacturing, and warehouse uses, would not create excessive demands on the existing power or natural gas system, but would require hookup to existing system lines. The proposed pr?jects with, 105,108·would of ing, arid "1arehouse uses, would not create the existing ·communication systems, but would existing system lines. office, manufactur- excessive demands on require hookup to The proposed.pr'ojects, with 105,108 s.f. of office, manufacturing, and warehouse uses, woula not create excessive· demands on the existing water system, but would require hookup to existing system lines. The proposed P.rojects with, 105,108 s.f. of office, manufacturing, and warehouse uses, would not create excessive demands on the existing sewer or septic tank system, but would require hookup to ·existing systein ·lines. The proposed projects, with 105,108 s.f. of office, manufacturing, and warehouse uses, would not create excessive demands on the existing storm water drainage system, but would require hookup to existing system lines. I The proposed prbjects, with 105,108 s.f. of office, manufacturing, and warehouse uses, would not require city solid waste collection and disposal. Disposal would be done by a private collection ser- vice. The proposed projects, with 105,108 s.f. of office, manufacturing, and warehouse uses, would require additional street lighting. The proposed projects would not be using any materials that would result in the creation of any health hazards or potential health hazards. : -• 17 .b. 18. 19. 20.a. 20.b. -20.c. 21.a. 21.b. 21.c. 21.d. The-n~~'developments are not -~xpected. to, ·expose people to health hazards due to the non-hazardous na.ture of the project. The proposed projects may disrupt the the area. The projects are part of an and extensive landscaping will· be located in the park, thus, creating environment. continuity of open space in industrial park area though provided by the structures an aesthetically pleasing The proposed projects would not result in an impact upon the quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities. No archaeological or historical artifacts are known to exist onsite. Therefore, the proposed projects will noc aiiecc arcnaeo- logical or historical resources. No archaeological or historical artifacts are known to exist onsite. Therefore, the proposed projects will not affect archaeo- logical or historic&! resources. There a+e no known archaeological or historical sites.near the vicinity of the projects, The proposed projects would not result iri destruction of these resources. The project .is not located in an area where it could impact bio- logical or culthral resources. The project wil,l have lorig~term benefits to the City of Moorpark. Shcirt~term visual impacts are likely to be prevalent until the stretch of industrial development is completed along Los ·Angeles Ayenue. A cumulative impact may.result with respect to traffic. The pro- ject alone is not expected to significantly impact the vicinity or the City as a whole. The project will have a cumulative impact when considered with other past, present, and reasonably foresee- able future projects. A cumulative impact may result with respect to air quality due to increased traffic. i This project will not have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects or pose a health hazard to human beings. • MITIGATED" SEGATIVE J)EC:LARAT.ION DP 393-396 MITIGATION MEASURES 1. The applicant shall be subject to requirements set forth by the Ventura County Air Pollution Control District as modified by the City of Moor- park. 2. The applicant shall provide exterior lighting with shields that face down, or are otherwise so directed, to reduce evening and nighttime light and glare from offsite locations. J. Tiu:: appl.i.l:aul shall locace poc:encially volacile or hazardous materials in a protected area away from areas occupied by employees, delivery persons or any other person known to be in the vicinity for a reason- able period of time. Materials, as-noted above, shall be stored and located in fully protected enclo.sures. 4. The applicant shall· encourage .alternative means of transportation to reduce automobile trips to the facility by providing common area bike racks. 5. To the-extent lines of the excess of City by the bulk of feasible, . the ap_plicant shall soften the architectural proposed project and provide·substariti.al landscaping in standards in order to reduce the visual impact created the new building. 6. The. applicant shall use reduced wattage light fixtures to avoidnight- time. glare on residential uses and on motorists along Los Angeles Ave- nue .. 7. Prior to zone clearance, Developer shall make a supplementary contribu- tion to the Los Angeles Avenue Area of Contribution iri the amount of $65,000, representing half of the estimated project costs to construct a traffic signal at the intersection of Maureen Lane at Los Angeles Avenue. When the City Engineer and Caltrans determine that traffic signal warrants are satisfied the City will proceed with construction of the ·signal, with funding to consist of 50% regular AOC funds and 50% Developer's supplementary AOC contribution. LDM-10 DP-397 -404 CITY OF MOORPARK PLANNING COMMISSION ·MEMORANDUM· ..• SECTION I: GENERAL INFORMATION A. HEARING DATE: March 7, 1988 B. HEARING TIME: 7:00 p.m. C. HEARING LOCATION: City Council Chambers, City Hall 799 Moorpqrk A vP.nne Moorpark, California G. REQUESTED ACTION: 1. Approval of Resolution --~ D. CASE NO.: LDM-10; DP-397 -404 E. STAFF CONT ACT: Duane Morita Sanchez Talarico Associates, Inc. F. APPLICANT: c/o Moorpark West Siegel & Associates, Inc. 510 l Douglas Fir Road Calabasas, CA 91302 o Sustaining recommendation to the City Council approval of the Mitigated Negative Declarations for LDM-10 and DP-397 -404 and sustaining recommendation that the ·City ·Council certify the information was considered on decisions related to the projects; and, • 2. Approval of Resolution ---· o Sustaining recommendation to the City Council approval to re- • subdivide three (3) •• existing industrial zoned. lots into twenty-six (26) . industrial lots (LDM-10). 3. Approval of Resolution --- :'_-::.:;:ts=:~c;~g ~~ ~~e Cit~, t:::om1cit approval of Development Plan Permits (DP~397 -404) for eight (8) proposed separate industrial structures of 45,805 s.f. (total) located in area planned for industrial use. H. PROJECT SUMMARY /LOCATION: The proposed project contains twenty-six (26) lots (LDM-10) and the eight (8) separate industrial structures (DP-397 -404). They are located on the eastside of Maureen Lane north of Los Angeles Avenue. The location of the project area is shown on page I of the Planning· Commission Staff Report. l Z. 7 LDM-10 and DP-397 -404 are located on a rectangular-shaped vacant parcel of land. LDM-10 would .be comprised of 12;4 acres. DP-397 -404 would encompass 102,741 s.r: of total land area or 2.36 acres .. 'The• total. building area of 4$,805 .s.f. (1.05 acres) . . . . . . . will be used for office, warehouse, and manufacturing purposes. DP-397 -404 will provide a total of 91 parking space and 18,908 s.f. of landscaping. I. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTIONS FROM FEBRUARY 1, 1988 PUBLIC HEARING The Planning Commission at its February l, 1988 meeting did the following: - 1. Opened the public hearing. 2. Took testimony from all those wishing to give testimony. 3. Deferred action on Resolutions to: o Approve Mitigated Negative Declaration for LDM-10 o Approve Mitigated Negative Declaration for DP-397 -404 o Approve LDM-10 o Deny without prejudice DP-397 -404 4. Requested staff research on the following: a. Base map providing the adjacent developments and zoning. b. Traffic impact/cir~ulaticn 2nd it's surrounding users c. Transportation. Management Sy~tem d. The sch~dule ~f L~s Angele~ A,:,enue widening e. Expanded traffic study related to the intersection of New Los Angeles Avenue/Spring Road and High Street/Spring Ro3d. 5. Requested that applicant revise site plans for DP-397 -404 to conform with setback and loading zone requirements of the Moorpark Zoning Ordinance. Please ref er to page 6 of the Planning Commission Staff Report for discussion of setback and loading zone inconsistencies. In summary, DP-398, 399, 402, and 403 did not provide adequate side yard setback. Moorpark Zoning Ordinance requires 30-foot side setbacks. DP-398. and 399 provided 12-foot side setbacks, while DP-402 and 403 provided 15-feet 10-inch side setbacks. Further proposed loading zones should not block aisle ways between proposed structures. DP-397 -404 proposed loading zones which blocked aisle ways and prevented constant flow of two-way traffic. J. STAFF ANALYSIS Conformitnce With Zoning Ordinance The applicant has revised the site plans for DP-3-97 -404, so as to conform with setback and loading zone requirements of the Moorpark Zoning Ordinance. Please refer to revised site plans for DP-397 -404. Adequate side setback has been provided for DP-398, 399, 402. and 403; loading zones have been relocated to areas where primary aisle ways are not blocked. Planning Commission Requested Research Discussion of those issues requested by the Planning Commission during the February l, K. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Planning Commission: 1. Recommend that the City Council accept the Mitigated Negative Declaration for LDM-10 and DP-397 -404. 2. Certify that the information contained in the Negative Declaration was considered on decisions related to the project. 3. Recommend that the City Council approve or modify and approve resubdivision LDM-10 and DP-397 -404 subject to the conditions stated in Attachments B & C of the Planning Commission Staff Report and Attachment B. of this memoran- dum. Atta_chment B of this ,memorandum presents additional required conditions _ and changes to conditions made· at the. February 1 • .1988 Planning Commission meeting. Attachment A & C of this memorandum are the Recommended Findings for DP-397 -404 based on the accepted site plans and Resolution to Approve DP-397 -404, respectively. I I I I I- A TI ACHMENTS A. Recommended Findings for DP-397 -404 based on accepted site plans. B. Revised Conditions of Approval. C. Resolution for Approval of DP-397 -404. D. Planning Commission requested research. i I ! I ATTACHMENT A. LDM-10 DP-397 -404 \30 • RECOMMENDED FINDINGS FOR LDM-10 -AND DP-397 -404 FEBRUARY 1, 1988 LDM-10 DP-397 -404 1. MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATIONS FOR LDM-10 AND DP-397 -404 a. That the Initial Studies are complete and h_ave been prepared in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the State CEQA Guidelines and City Policy. b. That the contents of the Initial Studies have been considered in the various decisions of these projects. c. That in order to reduce adverse impacts of the proposed projects, all feasible mitigation measures discussed in the environmental documents have been incorpor- ated into the proposed projects. Specific economic, social or other considerations make feasible any other potential mitigation measures to the proposed projects. 2. LDM-10 a. The proposed uses would not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience or welfare. b. The proposed resubdivision, together with the prov1s1ons for its design and improvement, is consistent with the General Pian. The proposed resubdivision is compatible with the objectives, policies, general land uses and programs specified in the General Plan. c. . The Planning Commission has considered the.effect of its action upon the housing • needs of the region and has balanced these needs against the public service needs of its residents and available fiscal and environmental resources. 3. DP-397 -404 a. The proposed uses would be consistent with the purpose, intent, guidelines, standards, policies and provisions of the City's General Plan but would not be consistent with Chapters 1 and 2 of the Ordinance Code. b. The proposed uses would impair the integrity and character of the zone m which they are to be located. c. The . proposed uses would be compatible with land uses permitted within the General Plan land use designations but not the zones in the general area where the uses are to be located. 15 131 LDM-10 DP-397 -404 d. The proposed uses would not be obnoxious or harmful or impair the utility of the property . itself or neighboring property • or uses. e. The proposed uses would not be detrimental to the public interest. health, safety, convenience or welfare. f. The proposed projects. together with the provisions for its design and improvement, are consistent with the General Plan: The proposed projects are compatible with the objectives, policies, general land uses and programs specified in the General Plan. g. The Planning Commission has considered the effect of its action upon the housing needs of the region and has balanced these needs against the public service needs of its residents anci ~v~!lahle fi~c31 2nd env!rnnPmnt::ll resources" 16 \3J. ATTACHMENT B. LDM-10 DP-397 -404 \4S3 ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 1. The following condition was required for approval of LDM-10 and DP-397 -404. "Prior to zone clearance. Developer shall make a supplementary contribution to the Los Angeles A venue Area of Contribution in the amount of $65,000. representing half of the estimated project costs to construct a traffic signal at the intersection of maureen Lane at Los Angles A venue. • When the City Engineer and Cal trans determine that traffic signal warrants • are satisfied the City will proceed with construction of the signal, with funding to consist of 50% regular AOC funds for 50% Developer's supplementary AOC contribution." (Condition No. 45 for LDM-10 approval and Con- dition No. 87 for DP-397 -404 approval) The foiiowing wiii be incorporared into the conditions: "It is intended that the developers of DP-393 -396 and DP-397 -404 together make one supplementary contribution totalling $65,000 and that once this contribution is received the developers will have no further specific funding responsibility for the subject traffic signal construction.'' 2. Additional City Engineer Condition for LDM-lO Prior to recordation. Applicant shall reimburse the developer of LDM-8 (Annotti) for all direct _construction expenses incurred in conjunction with construction of storm drain facilities along 11D11 Avenue within LDM-10. If necessary. the City Engineer will make the final determination of the reimbursable amount. 3. Additional City Eneineer Condition. for DP-397 Through 404 If within 8 months. following zone clearance of the first DP within· LDM-10 the Applicant has not completed construction' of. "D" Avenue and the .developer· of LDM-8 then constructs the improvements, the applicant shall reimburse the developer of LDM-8 for all direct construction expenses. Reimbursement shall be made prior to the time that the Applicant would otherwise be required to complete the improvements pursuant to these conditions. If necessary. the City Engineer will make the final determination of the reimbursement amount. ATTACHMENT C. LDM-10 DP-397 -404 135 ATTACHMENT D. " rO - CASE_ DP-322 DP-328 DP-329 DP-330 DP-331 DP-332 DP-337 DP-338 I_'r'PE & SQ. FT. 20,720 8,960 9,404 20,800 17,204 39,424 22,233 10,400 CITY OF MOO.RPARK -INDUSTRIAL STATUS REPORT APPLICANT Franz Wolf/F. E. Financial 250 Easy Street, Suite 5 Simi Valley, CA. 93065 (805) 522-7~58 Poindexter Assodates 9010 Corbin, Suite 12 Northridge, CA. 91324 (818) 701-1300 Poindexter Associates 9010 Corbin, Suite 12 Northridge, CA. 91324 (818) 701-1300 Poindexter Associates 9010 Corbin, Suite 12 Northridge, CA. 91324 (818) 701-1300 Poindexter As sod ates 9010 Corbin, Suite 12 North ridge, CA, 91324 (818) 701-1300 Cabot, Cabot & Forbes 2801 Townsgate Road Westlake Village, CA. 91361 (805) 495-9992 Dennis Kraft 31166 Via Colinas Westlcike Village, CA. 91362 (818) 889-5314 Mark Annotti 5000 N. Parkway Calabasas Calab.isas, CA. 91302 STATUS AND LOC~TION Under construction -8 Under construction (grading) -9 ' Under construction (grading) -10 Under construction -11 Under construction -12 Approved, not begun -13 Approved, not begun -14 Under construction -15 ,.0 M - CASE DP-339 DP-340 DP-341 DP-342 DP-343 DP-344 DP-345 , . TYPE & SQ. FT. 12,240 12,240 10,614 10,614 12,240 10,800 4;sos CITY OF MOORPARK -INDUSTRIAL STATUS REPORT APPLICANT Mark Annotti 5000 N. Parkway Calabasas • Calabasas, CA. 91302 (818) 702-9894 Mark Annotti 5000 N. Parkway Calabasas Calabasas, CA. 91302 (818) 702-9894 Mark Annotti 5000 N. Parkway Calabasas Calabasas, CA. 91302 (818) 102..:9394 Mark Annotti 5000 N. Parkway Calabasas Calabasas, CA. 91302 (818) 702-9894 Mark Annotti 5000 N. Parkway Calabasas Calabasas, CA. 91302 (818) 702-9894 Mark Annotti 5000. N. Parkway Calabasas Calabasas,. CA. 91302 (818) 702-9894 Mark Annotti 5000 N. Parkwav Calabasas Calabasas, CA. ·91302 (818) 702-9894 STATUS AND LOCATION Under construction -16 Under construction -17 Under construction -18 Under construction -19 Under construction -20 Under construction -21 Under construction -22 ~ - CASE DP-346 DP-347 DP-348 DP-349 DP-350 DP-351 DP-352 TYPE & SQ.FT. 4,606 5,200 49,660 5,200 15,372 30,701 30,701 CITY OF MOORPARK -INDUSTRIAL STATUS REPORT APPLICANT Mark. Annotti 5000 N. Parkway _Calabasas Calabasas, CA. 91302 (818) 702-9894 Mark Annotti 5000 N. Parkway Calabasa_s Cal.abasas, CA. 91302 (818) 702-9894 Dato Property Mgmt. 8619 Reseda Blvd., 306 Van Nuys, CA. 91406 °'-818) 997-7701 Mark Annotti 5000 N; Parkway Calabasas Calabasas., CA. 91302 (818) 702-9894 Mark Annotti 5000 N. Parkway Calabasas Calabasas, CA. 91302 (818) 702-9894 Mark Annotti 5000 N. Parkway Calabasas Calabasas, CA. 91302 (818) 702-9894 Mark Annotti 5000 N. Parkway Ca!ab2sas Calabasas, CA. 91302 (813) 702-9894 STATUS AND LOCATIQ_N Under construction -23 Under construction -24 • Approved, not begun -25 Under construction -26 Under construction -27 Under construction -28 Urider constructi0n -29 0 .,.. - CASE DP-353 DP-355 DP-356 DP-357 DP-358 . DP-361 DP-362 DP-389 TYPE & SQ.FT. 14,635 19,992 15,852 19,074 44,352 24, 192 23,040 office only 112~300 CITY OF MOORPARK -INDUSTRIAL STATUS REPORT APPLICANT Mark Annotti 5000 N. Parkway Calabasas Calabasas, CA. 91302 (818) 702-9894 West America Development Co. 8929 Wilshire Blvd, Suite 400 • Beverly Hills, CA. 90211 • (213) 652-8288 June Elmore 30156 Passageway Place Agoura, CA. 91301 West America Development Cci. 8929 Wilshire Blvd, Suite 400 Beverly Hills, CA. 90211 (213) 652-8288 Cabot, Cabot & Forbes 2801 Townsgate Road, #101 Westlake Village, CA. 91341 (818) 495-9192 Cabot, Cabot & Forbes 2801 Townsgate Road Westlake Village, CA. 91341 (818) 495-9192 Cabot, Cabot & Forbes • 2801 Townsgate Road, #101 Westlake Village, CA. 91341 (818) 495-9192 Cabot, Cabot & Forbes 2801 Townsgate Road, #101 Westlake Village, CA. 91341 (818) 495-9192 STATUS AND LOCATION Under construction -30 Completed -31 Under construction -32 Completed -33 Approved -34 Approved -35 Approved -36 Approved -37 -::r - CASE DP-390 DP-392 DP-393 DP-394 DP-395 DP-396 DP-397 TYPE & SQ.FT. 9,572 (auto repair) 200,097 39,896 20,300 20,000 • 24,912 6,880 CITY OF MOORPARK -INDUSTRIAL STATUS REPORT APPLICANT Sig Friedman 6441 La Cumbra Road Somis, Ca. 93066 (805) 987-8455 Cabot, Cabot & Forbes 2801 Townsgate Road, #1'01 Westlake Village, CA. (818) 495-9192 Moorpark -Los Angeles 5101 Douglas Fir Road Calabasas, CA. 91302 (818) 884'-4321 Moorpark -Los Angeles 5101 Douglas Fir Road Calabasas, CA. 91302 (818) 884-4321 Moorpark -Los Angeles 5101 Douglas Fir Road Calabasas, CA. 91302 (818) 884-4321 Moorpark -Los Angeles 5101 Douglas Fir Road Calabasas, CA. 91302 (818) 884-4321 Moorpark -West 5101 Douglas Fir· Road Calabasas, CA. 91302 (818) 884-4321 STATUS AND LOCATION Approved -38 Under construction -39 In process -40 In process -41 In process -42 In process -43 In process -44 re :::, ,... CASE DP-398 DP-399 DP-400 DP-401 DP-402 DP-403 DP-404 IPD-88-1 TYPE & SQ. FT. 5,990 5,990 5,965 5,210 5,210 5,210 6,000 8,486 l CITY OF MOORPARK -INDUSTRIAL STATUS REPORT APPLICANT SITE AND LOCATION Moorpark -. West In process -45 5101 Douglas Fir Road Calabasas, CA. 91302 (818) 884-4321 Moorpark -West In process -46 5101 Douglas Fir Road Calabasas, CA. 91302 (818) 884-4321 Moorpark -West In process -47 5101 Douglas Fir Road Calabasas, CA. 91302 (818) 884~'4321 Moorpark -West In process -48 5101 Douglas Fir Road Calabasas, CA. 91302 (818) 884-4321 Moorpark. -West In process -49 5101 Douglas Fir Road Calabasas, CA. 91302 (818) 884-4321 Moorpark -West In process -50 5101 Douglas Fir Road Calabasas,. CA. 91302 (818) 884-4321 Moorpark -West In process -51 5101 Douglas Fir Road Calabasas, CA. 91302 (818) 884-4321 Mike & Robin Horwitz In process -52 996 E. Calle Ruiz Thousand Oaks, California 91360 -(805) 497-1316 ATTACHMENT D - 1 BASE MAP PROVIDING ADJACENT DEVELOPMENTS AND ZONING 143 The Siracusa Company REAL ESTATE MARKET RESEARCH February 9, 1988 Mr. Nicholas Brown West America Construction Corp 8929 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 400 Beverly Hills, CA 90211 Subject: Moorpark Industrial Employment and Employee per square foot ratios. Dear Nick: Attached are employment and employee per square foot figures for industrial buildings in Moorpark. The data is arranged by industrial area which also happens to reflect very different intensities of use. The Gabbert Road -Goldman Avenue area has the lowest number of employees and the lowest intensity of use. The typical building has 1154 square feet of space per employee. The range is 706 to 480 square feet per employee. -Note that manufacturers utilize about 700 to 850 square feet of area per employee, while the distributors/warehousers utilize 900 to 2500 square feet per employee, with one extreme case at 4805 square feet. GABBERT -GOLDMAN INDUSTRIAL AREA SQUARE FEET/EMPLOYEE RATIOS Range: 705-4805 square feet Manufacturers: (typ) 705-824 square feet/employee Distributors/Warehouse: feet/employee (typ) 900-2470 square In contrast, the high tech buildings in The Moorpark and Freeway Business Centers have a very high intensity of use with an average of over 318 square feet of space per employee. This is due to the high proportion of office space built into these facilities. RESIDENTIAL • INDUSTRIAL • COMMERCIAL 3617 Thousand Oaks Blvd., Suite 218, Westlake Village, CA 91362 (805)495-5872 Using these figures (eliminating the extremes) a ratio range of 700 to 1500 square feet per employee should approximate the highest and lowest amount of employment likely to be generated by your projects. For 150,000 square feet, this would yield an employment count of 100 to 215 employees total. The most likely event is that the users will include a mix of manufacturers and warehousers with employment ending up in the middle range of 150- 175 employees. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call. Very truly yours, THE SIRACUSA COMPANY Ernest V. Siracusa Jr. President EVS:mjb Enclosures )t/' INDUSTRIAL EKPLOYHOO SURVEY -MOORPARK Gabbert to Goldaan Avenue Bl.DG. PRINARY COt1PANY ADDRESS SIZE ACTIVITY E11PLOYl1EHT SQ. FT. /EHPL ".G. l. 5151 Co ■■erce 19,813 Machine Shop 25 792 Var if lex 5152 Co■■erce 104.000 Nfg. Bicycles/Scooters.etc. 78 1333 C.T. Water Prod. 5239 Co ■■erce 22,239 Ntg. Drain Devices 30 82• Lagor ■arsino Liquor 5360 Co ■■erce 42,000 Liquor Warehouse/Dist. 17 2470 Air less co 5397 Co11mce 31, 728 Nachine Shop 45 705 Prudential Overall Sply. 5300 Gabbert 2B,040 Industrial Laundry 28 1001 H Ii H Supply 5390 Gabbert 21.324 Ditribute Auto Cleaning Prod. 5 2144 Colorol 5155 Gold ■an Av. 54,052 Wallpaper Warehouse/Dist. 58 932 Cal-J Aircraft 879 Los Angeles Ave. 9,000 Export Aircraft Parts/Warehouse 10 900 World Wide Aero Air Drv Cor~oration 5297 Haureen Lane 60,000 l'lfg. Dhydrators and Hanifolds 85 706 Kenney PH g. Co. 11910 Poindexter 62,640 Drapery Hardware Warehouse/Dist. 13 4805 Total: 4511,836 394 1.15q FI inn Road Area BLDG. Plill'IARY COMPANY ADDRESS SIZE ACTIVIH EHPLOVKENT S~.FT./8lPL -- Korns Surgical 610 FI inn Road 7,264 Hfg .. Surgical lnstrunents 6 1211 Ke1tdeK Corporation 616 Fitch 11. 340 Dist. of !■ported Yarns 20 567 Tota I: 1B,604 26 716 ltoorpark ano Freeway business Center BLDG. PRIMARY COl1PAIH ADDRESS SIZE ACTIVITY EliPLOYtiHIT SQ.Fl. /EliPL Koorpark Business Center Terminal Data Corp. 5898 Condor Dr. 97.6B0 Info. Management Systems 300 1l 326 Hi con 6100 Condor Dr. 86,412 Hfg. Data Communications Equip. 150 576 Litton Aero Products 6101 Condor Dr. 140,844 Design and Hfg.Navig. Syste ■s 575 245 Kavl ico Corp. 14501 Los Angeles Av 120.000 Nfg. Transducers, Capacitors 510 235 for Aerospace/Auto■otive Freeway Business Center Hetal Bel lows 200 Science Or. 112.320 Kfg. Hetal Parts Aerospace 200 562 Tande11 405 Science Dr. 105,500 Design L Htg. Co ■puters 350 2) 301 Total: 662,756 2,085 318 1 l Esti ■ated e1ploy1ent. Will occupy April 1986. 21 Wi 11 increase •400 by ■id 198B. Source: THE SIRACUSA COtlPAHY C' ::T - .-i, -J j 7 ,-- ! I I 14 31 ~ 3:~ l __ /,------------"----r----,--~· J ' ' . ' I I 6 7 - 8 I ~I~~~>( .. ,, .. , ...... i 1NOUSTRlt L, 3 MAPS I 1 OF 3 5 ... > I< \{. -------== 11 i:12 LI 30 3 ,L-_ 1 1 ., 29 I 28 26 15 16 17 18 19 --_j~ 20 -~ ~~~~~ -. '~ 22 COMMERCE 714614514•11 OP->,7· ( I I --+-~+--~-T-. I I 11 I::; I _ .. , ~ II I I . 0\ I f- 0: w rl' l- ·25 I I i' 38-~-----.----- . ,,.,. • ,,-F:. LfS ,e,;✓£.n□-~ r I I. LO-:, I-Nu_ ~ r-\) w ~~~~ m~T. - Fl_i~H 6..V~ I I P: I I ~ • I I 'I INN --~~ ~---1 ~L 2,4 7 " ', . ....__ '- ', '- "'-.. '-.. " -......,\ \ \. 37 ---- .... , ' .... . . •, ' . .' .•. '. I I I , -·~-..,, I FE r N 3 OF 3 . ' ,· ... D & - CASE DP-302 • DP-309 DP-311 DP-313 DP-314 DP-"317 DP-320 DP-321 TYPE & SQ, FT. 104,840 . 11,251 76, 189 81,271 (2 phases) 68, 191 53, 182 20,720 24,516 CITY OF MOORPARK -INDUSTRIAL STATUS REl"ORT APPLICANT Woodcrest Carpet Mills • 14933 Calvert Street Van Nuys, California 91411 (818) 787-4937 • Moorpark Properties 4512 F,3lkirk Bay Oxnard, California 93030 (805) ~185-1568 Don Scanlin 540 Del Oro Road Ojai, California 93033 (805) 646-4654 Roy Coats Family Trust 3100 Damon Way Burbank, California 91505 (818) 841-3050 Don Scanlin 540 Del Oro Road Ojai, California 93033 (805) 646-4654 West America Construction 5101 Douglas Fir Road Calabasas, California 91302 (818) 884-4321 Franz Wolf/F. E. Financial 250 Easy Street, #5 SimiV<!lley, California 93065 (805) 522-7558 Franz Wolf/F. E. Financial 250 Easy Street, #5 Simi Valley, California 93065 (805) 522-7558 STATUS AND LOCATION Under construction -1 Vacant, permit expired -16 Approved, pe.rmit expired -2 Completed -3 • Approved,. permit expired -5 ·~ Approved, not begun -4 Under construction -6 Under construction -7 ATTACHMENT D -2 TRAFFIC IMPACT CIRCULATION AND ITS SURROUNDING USERS (THIS INFORMATION IS CONTAINED WITHIN ATTACHMENTS D-1 and 0-5) ISi ATTACHMENT D-3 TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS MANAGEMENT (TSM) A TSM program is premature at this point. The City (as is the case with all cities in the County) is expected to adopt a TSM resolution in the next three to four months. This will .enable the City to establish a Citywide program of transportation planning including impletnentation tactics such as standard conditions of approval for development projects. If . the Commission desires, as an interim measure, a fee may be imposed to contribute to the funding of rides haring programs. Based on recent ridesharing programs established by Commuter Computer, the average 'cost of funding these programs is $. 10 (t@h cents) per square foot of floor area. For DP-393-396 this would be a total of 105,108 sq. ft. or $10,510.80. DP-397-404 comprises 45,805 sq.ft. or a $4,580.50 contribution. The two contributions together would total $15,091.30. It is suggested that the Commission consider if it wishes to impose this as a condition. It has not been listed in any of the revised conditions anywhere in the staff repor·ts for DP-393-396 or DP-397-404. ATTACHMENT D - 4 STATUS OF LOS ANGELES AVENUE WIDENING PROJECT MOORPARK JOHN GALl.OWAY Mayor STEVEN KUENY City Manager ELOISE BROWN Mayor Pro Tem CHERYL J. KANE CUNT HARPER. Ph.D. City Attorney PATRICK RICHARDS, A.I.C.P. Councilmember JOHN PATRICK LANE Councilmember MAUREEN W. WALL City Clerk TI-iOMAS P. GENOVESE City Treasurer TO: FROM: DATE: MEMORANDUM The Honorable City Council John F. Knipe, Assistant City Engineer February 9, 1988 Director of Community Development R. DENNIS DEI.ZEIT City Engineer JOHN V. GILLESPIE Chief of Police SUBJECT: Status of Los Angeles Avenue Widening Project BACKGROUND INFORMATION The primary items of work necessary to accomplish this project are illustrated graphically on Exhibit "A" and are described below: Plan Approval. The first check of the improvement plan has been completed by Cal trans, -~nd -we -ha:ve discussed with Cal trans their concerns regarding power pole relocations, drainage, and construction of curb, gutter, sidewalk, and striping. Due to Caltrans overlay projects that have occurred in the past year, additional survey work is being conducted to determine the current roadway elevation .. Some plan rev:i'.-sions are necessary, -as well as the additicn of detour plans. The plan revisions and subsequent review by Caltrans is expected to take approximately three months. Right-Of-Way Acquisition:: Although the project encountered significant difficulties during the right-of-way acquisition phase, acquisition has been completed for four of the five necessary parcels along the north side of Los Angeles Avenue. Although negotiations continue for the fifth parcel., the property owner has indicated that he will not delay the project. It is therefore anticipated that the right-of-way acquisition will be complete before Southern California Edison Company can begin power pole relocation. Power Pole Relocation. SCE has agreed to relocate the . ___ --~=-=-:.=::p,ec.es~~:r;y -· power'7 poles ==~ t=its :::0wn:-.:expense .. ~-oue-:-_-to :::-~di son~ s _____ , ... ~--work crew scheduling commitments, the earliest the relocation work can begin is expected to be July 1, 1988. The actual relocation is expected to take approximately -two months to compl~te. 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark. California 93021 (805) 529-6864 Page -2- Utility Work. Southern Californi~ Gas Company and Waterworks District No. 1 are both -planning to extend existing utility lines in the vicinity of Shasta Avenue. Once the power poles are relocated, this work should take approximately one or two months to complete. Award of Contract. It is anticipated that the bid advertising can begin at approximately the same time the utility relocation work begins. Following the advertising period, however, the bids must be received and evaluated, the contract awarded, the contract executed, bonds posted, and the Notice to Proceed issued. This processing is expected to take approximately two months. Construction. Following the Notice to Proceed, cons~ruction is expected to take approximately two months. As Exhibit "A" illustrates~ • construction· is_ expected--.' to 'be completed in February or March of 1989. Due tb .the -nature of the·project and the many parties involved, however, this schedule can be considered no more than approximate. RECOMMENDED ACTION This material is provided for information only, and no action is necessary._ JFK:MSW:ls Encl. cc: The Planning Commission Steve Kueny, City Manager ,ss ===Pat=Richards, •=1>irector-of-=:Communit-y .;:::DeYel-opment_~_:;::::. _::;:::;;;_=~-=_::::_=:-:, ___ -===--====-=-~-- R. Dennis Delzeit, City Engineer Mark Wessel, Senior Engineer M~rk Wi ttgraf, Project Engineer._ JN. 3426 CMO685.COU (2) l l j Xt( 3426 DA.TE 2-9-88 ,1 YEAR 1988 '.I MONTH 3 4 5 sl1 :1 I 1 PLAN APPROVAL / Ii 2 R/W ACQUISITION / I/ <! I 3 POWER POLE RELOCATK>N -- H I 4 UTILITY WORK I I 5 AWARD OF CONTRACT -I >---.. Ii 6 CONSTRUCTION I I ... 11 I .. i . .. . I J ' •. l I l I i II j l I .. ·- ,f ' I ., . I . •■ MINIMUM COMPLETION 'TIME I , . • ,j . I ·l:Z]POTENTIAL COMPLETION TIME l 8 9 I / f'ROJECT LOS ANGELES A VENUE WIDENING 1989 1C 111 1~ 1 2 3 l I I I I I I . I I I I I I I I I I I / l/1 / / I I I / I/ I I I I I I I I I I I l I I I I I . I I I I I I I I I I I .. ~ I -"' °' ATTACHMENT D - 5 EXPANDED TRAFFIC STUDY RELATED TO THE INTERSECTION OF HIGH STREET AND SPRING ROAD. (See attached traffic study dated February 24, 1988 from thomas S. Montgomery Associates.) CITY OF MOORPARK PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SECTION I: GENERAL INFORMATION LDM-10 DP-397 404 A. HEARING DATE: February 1, 1988 D. CASE NO.: LDM-10; DP-397 -404 B. HEARING TIME: 7:00 p.m. C. HEARING LOCATION: City Council Chambers, City Hall 799 Moorpark A venue Moorpark, California G. REQUESTED ACTION: E. STAFF CONT ACT: Duane Morita Sanchez Talarico Associates, Inc. F. APPLICANT: c/o Moorpark West Siegel & Associates,• Inc. 5101 Douglas Fir Road Calabasas, CA 91302 1. Approval· of Resolutions ___ and --~ o Recommending to the City Council approval of the Mitigated Negative Declarations for LDM-10 and DP-397 -404 and recommending that'. the City Council certify the information • was considered on decisions related to the projects; and, 2. Approval of Resolution. --- o Recommending to the City Council approval to re-subdivide three (3) existing industrial zoned lots into twenty-six (26) industrial lots (LDM-10). 3. Approval of Resolution __ _ Rcccw.ucuding to the City Couucil denial without prejudice of Development Plan Permits (DP-397 -404) for eight (8) proposed separate industrial structures of 45,805 s.f. (total) located in area planned for industrial use. H. PROJECT LOCATION: Eastside of Maureen Lane north of Los Angeles A venue. DP-396-404 LDM-10 ~ L----~-°MAUl!ii?~~T;;JJA...,m:.:..:~~--, > < en i en 0 ...J N ➔ PROJECT LOCATION LDM-10 & DP-398-4O4 I. PROCESSING EXPIRATION DA TE: July I, 1988 SECTION II: SUMMARY A. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: LDM-10 DP-397 -404 I. Staff recommends that the Planning Commission open the public hearing, take testimony from all those wishing to give testimony, and approve Resolution Nos. and ___ , recommending that the City Council approve the Mitigated Negative Declaration certify that the information was considered on decisions related to the project; and approved the re-subdivision of three (3) existing industrial zoned lots into twenty-six (26) lots subject to the conditions as stated in Section IV; and deny without· prejudice Development Plan Permits DP-397 -404. B. ALTERNATIVE PJ,,ANNING COMMISSION ACTIONS: I. Open the Public Hearing; close the Public Hearing; approve Resolutions Nos. ___ and ___ ; recommending that the City Council accept the Miti- gated Negative Declaration; certify that the information was considered on decisions related to the project; • recommend that the City Council approve • or n!odify the re-subdivision into twenty-six lots; and deny without prejudice Development Plan Permits (DP-397 -404) as r~commended by staff. 2. Find that it has reviewed and considered the Project Findings attached. to this Staff Report. Find that based upon the staff report and testimony presented at this public hearing that the Commission recommend that the City Council deny without prejudice approval of the re-subdivision into twenty-six lots and Developrn.ent Plan Permits DP-397 -404. 3. If the applicant concurs, continue to a date specified with direction to staff and applicant, as related to project issues. C. PROJECT SUMMARY: The proposed project contains twenty-six (26) lots (LDM-IO) and the eight (8) separate industrial structures (DP-397 -404). They are located on the eastside of Maureen Lane north of Los Angeles Avenue. 2 LDM-10 DP-397 -404 Regional access is provided to the site primarily along State Highway 118 (Simi Valley -San Fernando Freeway) from the northeast, State Highway 23 (Moorpark Freeway) from the east and Los Angeles A venue from the south. Direc.: site access is provided off of Maureen Lane. LDM-10 and DP-397 -404 are located on a rectangular-shaped vacant parcel of -a+7.2Hland. LDM-10 would be comprised of 12.4 acres. DP-397 -404 would encompass· 102,741 s.f. of total land area or 2.36 acres. The total building area of 45,805 s.f. (I .05 acres) will be used for office, warehouse, and manufacturing purposes. The project will provide a total of 91 parking spaces provided onsite. LDM-10 and the eight industrial structures are located within an area designated for industrial uses located within the western portion of the City of Moorpark. The General Plan designation for the site is Medium Industrial; zoning is M-2. D. ISSUES: -Based upon a review of the ultimate· development" of LDM-10 ·and np.:..397 -· 404, the issues identified related to the project include: 0 Setbacks 0 Loading Zones 0 Traffic 0 Air Quality 0 Visual Resources 0 Light and Glare 0 Flood Hazard· 0 Noise 0 Lot Size It is the opinion _of the staff that conditions of approval • on the project and mitigation measures identified in the Mitigated Negative Declaration will alleviate the issues identified above except for setbacks and loading zones (Refer to Section III for further 3 A. PROPOSED PROJECT: SECTION III: ANALYSIS . LDM-1.0 DP-397 -404 The total building area of DP-397 -404 would be 45,805 s.f. and would be used for industrial uses in the following breakdown (in s.f.): TABLE 1 PROPOSED LAND USE DP OFFICE MANUFACTURE \IAREHOUSE TOTAL 397 898 s.f. 3,DOO s.f. 2,742 s.f. 6,640 s.f. 398 300 s.f. 4,640 s.f. 1,000 s.f. 5,940 s.f. 399 600 s.f. 5,390 s.f. 5,990 s.f. 400 600 s.f. 5,365 s.f. 5,965 s.f. 401 527 s.f. 2,683 s.f. 2,000 s.f. 5,210 s.f. 402 300 s.f. 4,910 s.f. 5,210 s.f. 403 300 s.f. 4,000 s.f. • 690 s.f. 4,990 s.f. • 404 898 s.f. 1,962 s.f. 3,000 s.f. . 5,860 s.f. • TOTAL 4,423 s.f. 31,950 s.f. 9,432 s.f. 45,805 s.f. The applicant will lease the office, warehouse, and manufacturing space in the future. Hours of operation are anticipated to be from 6:00 a,m. to 7:00 p.m. LDM-10 occurs east of Maureen Lane, north of Los Angeles Avenue. • DP-397 -404 occur in two rows near the center of the LDM~l0 area. DP-397 -400 are located in the southern row; DP-401 -404 are located in the northern row. DP-397 -404 are all one-story structures. They will all have tilt-up textured concrete walls painted "navajo white" and bronze tinted tempered glass with anodized bronze aluminum mullion. Dark grey beige will be provided for the top of parapet for all structures. All structures will also have stripings around buildings painted either beige The half ton~ is the darker color mixed with white. Refer to color palette for the various colors. DP-397 will have light and dark violet stnpmg painted from accent group #4; DP-398, light and dark burgundy striping quirks from accent group #l; DP-399, light and dark grey striping from accent group #5; DP-400, light aqua blue striping from accent group #2; DP-401, light and dark green· striping from accent group #3; DP-402, light and dark violet striping from accent group #4; DP,..403, light aqua blue striping from accent group #2 and,. DP-404, will have light and dark burgundy striping painted from accent group #1. • 4 B. EXISTING . CONDITIONS: LDM-10 DP-397 -404 LDM 10 and the eight industrial structures are located within an area designated for industrial uses located within the western portion of the City of Moorpark. The General Plan designation for the site is Medium Industrial; zoning· is M-2. The area for LDM 10 and the eight structures is currently vacant. The site has been cleared and is currently level and primarily devoid of onsite trees or topographic features. Existing surrounding land uses and structures include an industrial building, rolling hills, and trees on adjacent property to the north; residential and commercial buildings, flat land and trees to the south; and industrial buildings, flat land and landscaping to the east and west. The General Plan designation for the surrounding areas is Medium Industrial to the north, east, and west and Low Density Residential to the south. Zoning is M-2 to the north, east, and .west and Single-Family R~sidential zoning to the south. . . A IO-inch pipe along. Maureen Land provides water to areas existing near the site. C. PROJECT HISTORY: Zone Change No. 2612 On August l, 1972, the County of Ventura adopted M-2 zoning. On December 23, 1980 Zoning Consistency. Ordinance 3512 was adopted. D. CONFORMANCE WITH EXISTING CITY POLICIES AND GUIDELINES: LDM 10 and DP-397 -404 are in conformance with the existing Moorpark Community Plan Land Use Element of the City . of Moorpark General Plan. In particular, the industrially-oriented policies applicable to the proposed structures include the following: o "Policy_ 2: To encourage industrial development to adopt a harmonious architectural style with appropriate landscaping and buffer areas." LDM IO and the eight structures propose an architectural style and color palette consistent with other proposed industrial structures in the Los Angeles A venue/Maureen Lane area. The proposed landscaping exceeds the required city landscape standards for the area. The landscaping contributes to the aesthetically pleasing quality of the area. o "Policy 5: In order to discourage strip industrial development, future industrial facilities should be -in the form of industrial parks." 5 LDM-10 DP-397 -404 LDM 10 and the eight proposed structures are part of a proposed indus- trial _park~ The . eight • industrial structures . are part of twelve • total industrial structures proposed for the area. • Implementation of the structures· would not result in strip industrial development. o "Policy 6: To establish sites for appropriate industrial uses in locations which are harmonious with adjoining land uses, and which do not degrade the general physical environment of Moorpark." LDM 10 and the eight proposed structures are surrounded on the north, west, and east by planned industrial uses as designated by the City's General Plan. i..uivi iv auu u1e ta~nL pcupu:;eu :;Lrm.aurns w111 oe cieveioped such mat no detrimental effects will occur. DP-397 -404 are not in conformance with setback and loading zone requirements of the Moorpark Zoning Ordinance as shown in Table 2. DP-398, 399, 402, and 403. • do not provide adequate side yard setback. Zoning Ordinance requires 30.-foot side setb~cks. DP-J98 and 399 provide setbacks, .while DP-402 and 403 provide 15...:feet IO-inch side setbacks. Moorpark 12-foot side -· Further, proposed loading zones should not· block aisle ways between proposed struc- tures. DP-397 -404 propose loading zones which block aisle ways and prevent constant flow of two-way traffic. Since the· LDM-10 area is currently subdivided into three lots, it can be assumed that the original intent of the City Zoning Code was to have large-lot industrial uses at the -LDM-10 area and: not smaller ·1ots. Zoning standards (i.e. side yard setbacks and -loading_ zones) may not l>e appropriate to the • small lots associated with DP-397 _ ~ 404. E. AGENCY REVIEW: Departments which reviewed: LDM-10 and DP-397 -404 include the City Engineer, County Fire D.epartment, County Flood Control District, County Sheriff's Department, County Waterworks, Caltrans, County Environmental Health, Air Pollution Control District, and Moorpark Unified School District. The City Community Development Department, City Engineer, County Fire Department, Caltrans., County Sheriff's Department~ County Environmental Health, and Air Pollution Control District have submitted conditions for approval of DP-397 -404, as attached to this staff report. 6 Jt3 :,- '° - CITY REQUIREMENTS 1. Setbacks: Setbacks for inter- ior lots. Front: 20 feet Side: 30 feet Setbacks for corner lots. Front: 20 feet Side: 10 feet 2, Height: 30 feet 3. _Parking 4, Off-Street Loading Zone 5. Landscaping: parking 6. Minimum Lot Area: 10,000 s.f. 7. Site Coverage: No require- ment. DP-397 Front: 20-25 feet Side: 35 feet 6 inches 20 feet 12 spaces required. 12 spaces provided. 1 semi-truck space required. 1 semi-truck space provided. 698 s.f. required. 1,906 s.f. provided. 13,962 s.f. 48% TABLE 2 DP-397 -404 CONFORMANCE VITH MOORPAPJC ZONING ORDINANCE ll.:.ill. Front: 20 feet Side: 12 feet 19 feet 6 inches 11 spaces required. 11 spaces provided. 1 semi-truck space required. 1 semi-truck space provided. 633 s.f. required. 1,934 s.f. provided. 12,652 s.f. 471 .ll1..::..ill. Front: 20 feet Side: 12 feet 19 feet 6 inches 13 upaces required. 13 upaces provided. ~ Front: 20 feet Side: 10 feet (corner lot) 19 feet 4 inches 13 spaces required. 13 spaces provided. 1 semi-:ruck space required. 1 semi-truck space required. l semi-cruck space provided. 1 semi-truck space provided. 653 s.f. required, 2,178 s.f. provided. 13,152s.f. 45.5\ 721 s. ~. required. 3,002 ·s.f. provided. 14,409 s. f. 411 '° '° - CITY REQUIREMENTS 1. Setbacks: Setbacks for inter- ior lots. Front: 20 feet Side: 30 feet Setbacks for corner lots. Front: 20 feet Side: 10 feet 2. Height: 30 feet 3. Parking 4. Off-Street Loading Zone 5. Landscaping: parking 6. Min,imum Lot Area: 10,000 s.f. 7. Site Coverage: No require- ment. .ll1.=.iQl Front: 20 feet Side: 10 feet (corner lot) 19 feet 6 inches 10 spaces required. 11 spaces provided. 1 semi-truck space required. 1 semi-truck space provided·. 648 s.f. required. 3,818 s.f. provided. 12,952 s.f. 401 TABLE l DP-397 ·• 404 CONFORMANCE VITH MOORPARK ZONING ORDINANCE (Continued) .Ql.:.fil Front: 20 feet Side: 15 feet 10 inches 19 feet 3 inches 11 spaces required. 11 spaces provided. 1 semi-truck space required. 1 semi-truck space provided. 591 s.f. required. 2,134 s.f. provided. 11,808 s.f. 441 Qf.:lt.Ql Front: 20 feet Side: 5 feet 10 inches 19 feet 4 inches 10 spaces required. 10 spaces provided. none r"quired. 1 ·semi-truck space provided. 566 s.f. required. 1,878 s.f. provided. 11,3GB s.f. M,% l2l.:.fil Front: 20 feet Side: 35 feet 6 inches 20 ··feet • 10 spaces required. 10 spaces provided. l semi-truck space required. 1 semi-truck space provided. 625 s.f .. required. 2,058 s.f. provided. 12,498 s. f. 461 F. ENVIRONMENTAL SIGNIFICANCE: Traffic: LDM-10 DP-397 -404 A traffic report was completed on July IO. 1987 by Thomas S. ·Montgomery & Associ- ates to determine potential • traffic impacts associated with the ultimate development of LDM-10. The complete traffic report is attached to this staff report, and is summarized below: . -The -existing conditions section of the traffic report discussed • important arterials and intersections. Arterials include Los Angeles A venue and Maureen Lane. Los Angeles A venue, State Route 118 (SR 118), is the major east-west· route bisecting the City of Moorpark. This important arterial now carries between 16,000 and 22,000 vehicle trips per day (vpd) in the vicinity of the project area and has a roadway varying from a minimum of one lane in each direction to a cross section striped for seven lanes. Maureen Lane, a two lane collector street, is stop sign • co_ntrolled at Los Angeles A venue and has one approach lane in each direction. Los Angeles A venue at Maureen Lane has one approach lane for eastbound traffic and one approach lane plus a separate left-tum-only lane for westbound traffic. Study intersections included Los Angeles A venue and Tierra Rejada Road-Gabbert Road; .Los Angeles A venue and Moorpark A venue; Los • Angeles A venue and Moorpark Road, and Los Angeles A venue and Maureen Lane. The intersection of Los Angeles Avenue and Tierra Rejada Road-Gabbert Road is controlled by a traffic signal. The intersection of Los Angeles Avenue and Moorpark Avenue is. controlled with an actu- • ated traffic signal with separate left t~rn phasing for east and ~estbound traffic plus "split phasing" for north and southbound approach traffic. The intersection of Los Angeles A venue and Moorpark Road is c_ontrolled with an actuated traffic signal with separate left turn phasing_ for east and westbound approach traffic. Maureen Lane, a two. lane coHector street, is a stop sign contr~lled at Los· Angeles Avenue and_ has one approach lane _ in each direction. Los Angeles A venue at Maureen Lane has one approach lane for • eastbound traffic and one approach lane plus a separate left-turn o_nly lane for westbo.und· traffic. The street system in the vicinity of the project area is operating at relatively high levels· of service except at the intersection of Los Angeles A venue and Maureen Lane. This intersection is operating slightly in excess of design capacity in the afternoon peak travel period due primarily to the relatively heavy westbound through traffic demands that are now confined to one travel lane. The additional traffic that would be generated by the ultimate development of LDM-10 vehicles per day, about 1600, is relatively low and would not change the existing street system volume/capacity relationships to a significant • degree. Existing volume/capacity relationships and levels of service are presented for each study intersection in Table 3. It should be noted that completion of the connection of the Moorpark (SR 23) and Simi Valley-San Fernando (SR 118) Freeways, anticipated to occur in the mid-l 990's, will drastically alter traffic flow patterns in and through the City of Moorpark and may significantly · improve traffic flow along the concerned portion of Los Angeles A venue. The traffic study 7 1(6 LDM-10 DP-397 -404 indicated that additional mitigation measure~ would not. further reduce adverse impacts • to any significant degree. •. TABL.E 3 •• EXISTING VOLUME/CAPACITY ltELATIONSHIPS St',Xfv Intersection Los Angeles Avenue & Moorpark Road Los Angeles Avenue & Moorpark Avenue Los Angeles Avenue & Maureen Lane Los Angeles Avenue & Tierra Rejada Road/Gabbert Road ICU*/LOS VALUES. Morning Peak Hour Period 0.59/A 0.42/A 0.68/8 0.65/B Afternoon Peak Hour Period 0.64/8 0.58/A 0.81/D • 0.66/B *Intersection capacity utilization method estimates current operational efficiency. Source: Traffic Iq:>act Study; prepared by Thomas·s. Montgomery & Associates; refer to Section IV, Part E. ·-. It is estimated that ultimate development of LDM-10 would generate about 1600 vpd with maximum directional peak demands between 123 and 139 vehicle trips per hour (vph) inbound in the morning peak period and outbound in the afternoon peak period, respectively. Table 4 presents number. of additional vehicle trips . generated by DP-397 -404. Time Period AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Daily Total In out •. TABLE 4 . SITE TRAFFIC GENERATION Nunber of Additional Vehicle Trips 123 37 43 135 1600 Source: Traffic lq:>act Study; prepared by Thomas s. Montgomery & Associates; refer to Section IV, Part E. 8 1,7 LDM-10 DP-397 -404 It should be noted_ that a fifteen (15) lot industrial subdivision (LDM-8) abuts· LDM-10 . ·to the east.-_ . As a condition., to its approval; -LDM-8 connects Maureen-Lane with. • Goidman· Avenue~ which· parallets· Maureen Lane _to the east. LDM-10 and: LDM~8 _-are · similar in that the subdivisions are small lots. Maureen Lane will be subject to traffic flows from DP-393 -· 396; LDM-8; and LDM-_10, including _DP-397 -404. Total future cumulative • traffic demands would consist of ultimate development of LDM-10 traffic plus the additional traffic that would be· generated by other known planned developments in the study area plus future b~ckground traffic demands.· Three of the four applicable study area intersections would still be operating at relatively high ·1evels of service with a slight, but insignificant degradation in the LOS D condition at Los Angeles A venue and Maureen Lane during the afternoon commuter • peak travel period. The intersection of Los Angeles A venue and Moorpark Road would be operat- ing well in excess of design capacity during both commuter peak travel periods. Total future demands at the intersection of Los Angeles A venue and Maureen Lane may warrant the installation· of traffic signal control if the intersection is considered to be in a "rural" environment (i.e., with approach speeds on Los Angeles A venue at Maureen Lane still in excess of 40 miles per hour). Because in the future there will be a number of signalized intersections on this portion of Los. Angeles A venue, it is possible, if not probable, that average travel speeds will drop below 40 miles per hour. If this situation_ occurs, the jntersection of Los Angeles A venue and Maureen Lane would not meet. -the normal warrants -for installation· of traffic signal control as developed by C_ALTRANS. Air Quality: Traffic _trips associated with LDM-:-10 and operation of the eight industrial facilities will contribute to cumulative air quality impacts in the vicinity. Once operational, the facility would employ people in _ a single shift from 6:00 a.m. to · 7:00 p.m·.. Monday .. • through Friday. It. is estimated that. ultimate development of LDM-10 would generate · • about· 1600 vpd (Table 3). • The air quality in this region, is generally good. This project, in conjunction with other past, present and reasonably foreseeable future projects would incrementally contribute to a degradation of air quality. This impact is not considered a significant impact. All Ventura County Air Pollution Control District (APCD) regulations will be implemented into the project to help lessen, any cumulative air quality impacts from the project. Visual Resources: LDM-10 and the eight struc_tures comply with existing City standards on lot coverage and building height and will provide landscaping well in excess of City requirements. The color pallete for the. eight structures are generally warm and consistent with other industrial buildings occurring in the City. 9 LDM-10 op..;397 -404 The primary issue associated with visual resources relates to potential views of the ultimate development-of· LDM"".10 industrial structures from residents located south and motorists travelling on_ Los Angeles A venue. The sites a(e currently vacant~ : ,Adjacen~ to the sites ~re' o_ther e~isting -and proposed industrial buildings. - The ind~strial structures are located within an area designated for· industrial \lSe. Residents and motorists south -of the site would be subject to views of an industrial site rather than to views of a cleared and otherwise undeveloped portion of the City. Roof equipment of the four structures may also be visible. Equipment could include vents, air conditioners, aild possible heaters. The applicant is subject to a condition of approval to provide screening of this roof equipment. The screening would be composed of materials similar to the structure, and would be subject to the approval of the Director of Community Development. Compliance with applicable conditions would eliminate/redui::e nost visual concerns. It is the opinion of City Staff that, subject -to the conditions of approval, the applicant will have provided methods to reduce visual impacts to the extent feasible. Light and Glare: Similar to visual resources, LDM-10 and DP-397 -404 may result in increases in light and glare in the evening and nightti_me hours. The sites are currently vacant. The proposed stn1ctures would_ pr_ovide illumination to parking areas. These lights could be visible from neighborhoods-and Los Angeles A venue motorists to the south. Skylights wouid be provided in the ro~f of • the structure to enhance interior natural lighting, as required by Tide 24. These skylights may be visible during nighttime hours if the interior of the structure is illuminated. These skylights would incrementally add to overall nightti_me visibility of the structure. The overall potential light_ alid glare impact in not considered significant. The sites are located _within an area designated for·· industrial _ uses that • would be illuminated during • the ·nighttime· hours. The • proposed ·structures would incrementally add ·to this lighting. Extensive landscaping along the southern periphery of the sites fronting Los Angeles A venue would reduce the amount of light and glare from the sites. The structures would be required to provide lighting fixtures with shields that are directed downward and skylights that are as opaque as feasible. Flood Hazard: i The southern lots of LDM-10 abutting Los Angeles A venue area are located in Zone C, areas of minimal flooding according to the Federal Emergency Management Agency Flood Insurance Rate Map. The remainder of LDM-10 and DP-397 -404 encroach into Zone B, areas between limits of the 100-year flood and 500-year flood or certain areas subject to 100-year flooding. The applicant is required to conform with the provisions of Ordinance 42, relating to floodplain and the conditions of approval of the City Engineer to mitigate flooding impacts. ''" • Noise: LDM-1-0 DP-397 -404 . -.. The proPQsed indµstrial · uses will result in automobile and truck · traffic and the • operation of equipment. Auto . traffic will primarily occur from employees coming and going to work, lunch, and errands. Truck traffic will be the result of distribution of manufa~tured goods, and deliveries to and from the site. Mechanical equipment associated. with manufacturing may be in operation some, or all, of most days. The traffic and equipment will result in increased noise throughout each day. The noise generated at the site would be perceived primarily by adjacent users . within the. industrial area and is not considered a significant impact. Residents south of the sites may be impacted by noise. DP-397 -404 are located approximately 500 feet north of Los Angeles A venue. Operations occurring at DP-397 -404 will not generate noise levels which will significantly impact residents south of Los Angeles· A venue. The proposed structures are anticipated to result in incremental noise levels in the general vicinity. F. STAFF ANALYSIS Gt;neral Plan/Zoning Consistency DP-397 -404 are consistent with the Moorpark General Plan Land Use El.ement and for the goals and policies designated f9r industrial uses. The sites are designated for industrial use on the General Plan; The· proposed • industrial structures • would infill vacant parcels in an existing industrial area that is currently preplanned for such a use. DP-397 -404 are not in conformance· with setback and· loading zone requirements of the Moorpark Zoning Ordinance. DP-398, 399, 402, and 403 dQ not provide adequate side setback, while loading zones proposed for each industrial structure occur in areas ~hich block aisle ~ays~ thus, • preventing constant . flow • of two;..way traffic. • Staff -recoinme~ds ·that rea~ parking. areas currently designed for DP-398, ·399, 4o·i •. ·~nd· 403· be moved to side of buildings, so ~ to create adequate side setback which exceed City zoning requirements. Parking is permitted in setbacks. Staff also recommends that proposed loading zones be relocated to areas where aisleways are not blocked. Environmental Concerns The projects would not result in significant environmental concerns. Potential environmental issues related to traffic, air quality, visual resources, light and glare, and flood hazard are not considered significant, or can be reduced to a level of insignifi- cance. · All appropriate mitigation measures have been included as suggested Conditions of Approval (Section !V). 11 )70 LDM-10 DP-397 -404 Parking/Landscaping Requirements DP-:-397 .... 404· proyide _parking spaces and landscaping in excess of City re·quirements. 90 total ·spaces are required; the pro$ects ~ill provide a total· of. ~fr spaces. 5,140 s.f. of total landscaping is required; the ptojects will provide a total of 18,908 s.f. Shading of parking· areas are consistent with County of Ventura and City of Moorpark Guide-. lines. Existing municipal services can be provided to the site without causing the need for additional facilities. Public Opposition At the time . of preparation of this Staff Report, there· is no known oppos1t1on to DP-397 -404. Since the projects are proposed in an area preplanned for such development, and since the area is already developing in these uses, significant oppu:s1iiu11 i.O vr-3:,, -... 0 ... dlC 11Ul l,;Ullt:llliy dlllll,.,llJdlCU. Staff recommends that the Planning Commission: I. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Open the Public Hearing; Close the Public Hearing; I Recommend . that· the City Council accept the Mitigated Negative Declaration for LDM-10 and DP-397 -404; Certify that the information contained· in the • Negative Declaration was considered on decisions related to the project; ._ Recommend that· the City· Council· approve or modify and . approve resubdivision LDM-10; and Recommend that the City Council deny without prejudice DP-397 -404. Prepared by: Approved by: Duane A. Morita, Contract Planner Sanchez Talarico Associates, Inc. 12 Patrick J. Richards Director of Community Development City of Moorpark 17f • SECTION IV: A TI ACHM'.ENTS A; FINDINGS I. Mitigated Negative Declarations for LDM-10 and DP-397 -404 2 .. LDM-10 3. DP...:397 -404 B. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR LDM-10 1. Community Development 2. City Engineer 3. City Police 4. Ventura County Fire Protection 5. Waterworks District 6. Caltrans 7. Ventura County Environmental Health C. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR DP-397 -404 1. Community Development 2 .. City Engineer • 3. City Police · 4. Ventura County Fire Protection 5. Ventura County Air Pollution Control District 6. Waterworks District 7. Caltrans 8. Ventura County Environmental Health D .. RESOLUTIONS 1. Mitigated Negative Declaration for LDM-10 2. Mitigated Negative Declaration for DP-397 -404 3. Approval of LDM-10 4. Denial Wi!hout Prejudice of DP-397 -404 E. TRAFFIC REPORTS 1. LDM-10 2. DP-397 -404 F. INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION 1. LDM-10 2. DP-397 -404 13 LDM-10 DP-397 -404 A. FINDINGS I. Mitigated Negative Declarations for LDM-10 and DP-397 -404 2. LDM-10 3. DP-397 -404 14 LDM-10 DP-397 -404 173 RECOMMENDED FINDINGS . . • . FOR LDM-10 AND DP-397 -404 • FEBRUARY 1, 1!>88 LDM-10 DP-397 -404 .1. MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATIONS FOR LDM-10 AND DP-397 -404 a. That the Initial Studies are· complete and have been prepared in· compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the State CEQA Guidelines and City Policy. b. That the contents of the Initial Studies have been considered in the various decisions of these projects. c. That in order to reduce adverse impacts of the proposed projects, all feasible mitigation measures discussed in the environmental documents have been incorpor- ated into the proposed projects. Specific • economic, social or other considerations make feasible any other potential mitigation _measures to the proposed projects. 2. LDM-10 a. The pr(?posed uses would not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience or welfare. b. The proposed resubdivision, together 'with the prov1s1ons for its • design and improvement, is consistent -with the General Plan. The proposed resubdivision is compatible with the objectives, policies, general land uses and programs specified in the General Plan. c. . The J>lflnning _ Commission has considered the effect of its action upo~ the housing needs of-_the· region and has balanced these needs. against the public service needs • of its residents and a~aitable fiscai" and environmental res~urces. 3. DP-397 -404 a. The proposed uses would be consistent with the purpose, intent, guidelines, standards, policies and provisions of the City's General Plan but would not be consistent with Chapters I and 2 of the Ordinance Code. b. The proposed uses would impair the integrity and character of the zone m which they are to be located. c. The proposed uses would be compatible with land uses permitted within the General Plan land use designations but not the zones in the general area where the uses are to be located. 15 LDM-10 DP-397 -404 d. The proposed uses would not be obnoxious or harmful or impair the utility of the • property itself or neighbor.ing prop~rty or uses. e. The proposed uses would not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience or welfare. f. The proposed projects, together with the prov1s1ons for its design and improvement, are consistent with the General Plan. The proposed projects are compatible with the objectives, policies, general land uses and programs specified·. in the General Plan. g. The Planning Commission has considered the effect of its action upon the housing needs of the region and has balanced these needs against the public service needs of its residents and available fiscal and environemntal resources. 16 B. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR·LDM-10 1. Community Development 2. City Engineer 3. Ventura County Sheriff's Department 4. Ventura County Fire Protection 5. Waterworks District 6. Caltrans 7. Ventura: County Environmental Health 17 LDM-10 DP-397 -404 LDM-10 DP-397 -404 LAND DIVISION NO:.· LDM-10 Siegel & Associates, Inc. • February 1, 1988 • • APPLICANT: . DATE::. DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CONDITIONS GENERAL REQUIREMENTS: 1. That the conditions of approval· of this Land Division map supersedes all conflicting notation, specifications, dimensions, typical sections and the like which may be shown on siad map and that all of the provisions of the Subdivision Map Act, City of Moorpark Subdivision Ordinance, and adopted County Policies apply. 2 That al! reauirements of any h'.v er 2gency of the State, Ventura Connty, :mo City of Moorpark and any other governmental enmity shall be met, and all such requirements and enactment shall, by reference, become conditions of the entitlement. 3. That no condition of this entit!eme!lt shall be ir.terpreted as permitting er requiring any violation of law, or any lawful rules or regulations or orders of an authorized . gov~rn!Dental agency. ln in.stances where more than one set of rules apply, the . str.icter ones shall take. precedence. 4. That if any • of the ·conditions or. limitations of this entitlement • are held to be • invaiid, that holding shall not invalidate any of the remaining conditions or limitations set forth. 5. That applicant agrees as a condition of issuance (or renewal) and use of this permit, to-defend, at his sole expense, ~ny action brought against the City because of issuanc_e (or renewal) of this permit or, in the alternative, to relinquish this permit. Applicant .will reimburse the City for any court costs and/or attorney's • fees 'which ·the. City· may be required by a court to. pay as a' result • of any such action the City may, at, its sole discretion, participate in the defense of any such action, but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligation under this condition. - 6. That applicant's recordation of this map shall be deemed to be acceptance by applicant of all conditio'ns of this land division. PRIOR TO APPROVAL OF FINAL MAP, THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED: 7. As of the date of recordation of final (LDM) map, the lots depicted thereon shall meet the requirements of the zoning ordinance and General Plan then applicable to the property. Compliance with this condition shall be required even if the zoning and General Plan requirements in effect as. of the date the tentative mp is · 18 )77 LAND DIVISION NO.: LDM-10 • APPqCANT: -Siegel -& -Associates, Inc. • · February-. 1, 1988 DATE: DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CONDITIONS (Cont'd.) conditionally approved. Conditional approval of-the tentative map shall neither limit the power of the_ legislative body to amend the applicable_ zoning ordinances and/or general plan _ nor compel the • legislative body to make any such amend- ments. 8. Prior -to approval of the final map, the developer shall obtain a "District Release" from the Camrosa Municipal Water District indicating payment of District's Capital Construction charges, • 9. Prior to approval of the final map, an "Unconditional Will Serve" letter for water and sewer service shall be obtained from Ventura _County Waterworks District No. I or that the applicant shall have satisfied all requirement$ of the Ventura County Waterworks District No. 1 for annexation and will be provided with both water and sewer of provided tempo~ary water service from Camrosa _Water District to the satisfaction of the County Water Works District. DURING CONSTRUCTION, THE FOLLOWING-CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISIFIED: 10. That at the time water service connection is made, cross connection control devices shall be installed on the water system in accordance with the requirements of the Ventura County Division of Environmental Health. 19 178 LDM-10 DP-397 -404 LAND DIVISION NO.: . APPLICANT: LDM-10 Siegel & Associates; Inc: -·DATE: .• February 1~· 1988 : CITY ENGINEER'S CONDITIONS PRIOR TO APPROVAL OF FINAL MAP, THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED: 11. The applicant shall submit to the City of Moorpark for review and approval, a grading plan prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer; shall obtain a Grading Permit; and shall post sufficient surety guaranteeing completion. 12. The applicant shall submit to the City of Moorpark for review and approval, a detailed Soils Report rertified by ::i TP£;~tprpn ~,-r;f;:,<:';'.;,-,n,,;1 r: •• ,:1 ~,,:::;;""'"''"' ••• ~1",,:; State of California._ The grading plan shall incorporate the recommendation of the approved Soils Report. 13. The applicant shall submit to the City of Moorpark for review and approval, street improvement plans prepared by Registered Civil Engineer; shali enter into an agreement with the City of Moorpark to complete the improvements; · and shall post sufficient surety guaranteeing the construction of the improvements. The improvements shall include conqete curb· and gutt_er, sidewalk, stre~t lights, striping and signing, paving, and any necessary transitions in accordance with the Ventura County Road Standards. The applicable Road Standard Plates are as follows: a. "C" Street, "0" A venue, "A" Court, and "B~ Court to be constructed per Plate B-3D ip.odified to have 40 feet pavement .width and 50 feet right-of-way width .... b. Maureen Lane to be constructed per Plate B-3D. c. Los Angeles Avenue to be constructed per Plate B-2A along property fron- tage. A meandering sidewalk shall be constructed along Los Angeles A venue, with the plans approved by the Director of Community Develop- ment. d. All cul-de-'-saces to be constructed per Plate C-3. e. All streets shall have a minimum of 4 inches of asphalt. f. Driveways to be constructed per Plate E-2 and to be 30 feet wide. 20 LDM-10 DP-397 -404 LAND DryISION NO.: LDM-10 APPLICANT: · Siegel &-Associates,-Inc. DATE: Fe~ruary 1,· 1988 CITY ENGINEER'S CONDITIONS _(Cont'd.) I 4. The applicant shall demonstrate for each building pad to the satisfaction of the • City of Moorpark as follows: a. Adequate protection from 100-year frequency storm; and b. Feasible access during a IO-year frequency storm. IIydrulogy cakulations shall be per current Ventura County Standards. I 5. The applicant shall deposit with the City of Moorpark a contribution for the Los Angeles A venue Improvement Area of Contribution. The actual deposit shall be the then current Los Angeles A venue Improvement Area of Contribution applicable rate at the time the building permit is issued. 16. The applicant shatr indicate in writing to the City of Moorpark, the uisposition of any water well(s) and any other w(l,ter that may exist within the site. If any· wells • are • proposed to be abandoned, or if they are • abandoned • and have not been properly sealed, they must be destroyed per Ventura County Ordinance No. 2372. 17. The applicant shall submit to the City of Moorpark for review and approval, drainage plans, hydrologic, and hydraulic calculations _ prepared by a Registered Civil Engi~eer; shall -enter • into an · agreement • with the City of -Moorpark to complete the.-·_ improvement' and shall post • sufficient surety guaranteeing the construction of the. improvements. The drainage plans and calculations shall • indicate the following conditions before and after development. Quantities of water, water flow rates, major water courses, drainage areas and patterns, diversions, collection systems, flood hazard areas, sumps and drainage courses. ·· Hydrology shall be per current Ventura County Standards except as follows: a. All sumps shall carry a 50-year frequency storm; b. All catch basins on continuous grade shall carry a IO-year storm; c. All catch basins in a sump condition shall be sized such that depth of water at intake shall equal depth of approach flows; d. All culverts shall carry a 100-year frequency storm; 21 J 8o LDM-10 DP-397 -404 LAND DIVISION NO:: . APPLICANT~ LDM-10 ~iegel .&. Associates, Inc. DATE: February I, 1988 - CITY ENGINEER'S CONDITIONS (Cont'd.) • e. Drainage facilities shall be provided such that surface flows are intercepted and contained prior to entering collector or secondary roadways; f. Under a IO-year frequency storm, all collector streets shall be provided with a minimum of one travel lane with a goal that local, residential streets shall have one travel lane available where possible. If a tr:1vP.l l:1nP. ~:1nnot be maintained as described in f. above,· the storm drain will be extended and/or additional catch basins provided to satisfy this condition. 18. For any Final Map, or a Parcel Map (containing five or more· parcels), or any Parcel Map whereupon dedications are required to be offered, the applicant shall transmit by certified mai! a copy of the cor.diticnally a::-prcved Tentative Map together with a copy· of Section 66436 of the State Subdivision Map Act to each public_ . entity or public utility · that is an easement holder of record. Written . complianc~ • shall. b_e submitted . to the City of Moorpark. 19. If any _of the improvements which-the applicant is required to construct or install is to be constructed • or installed upon land in which the applicant does not have title or interest sufficient for such purposes, the applicant shall do all of the following at least 60 days_ prior to the filing of the final or parcel map for _ approval pursuant to Government ·Code Section 66457. a. Notify the City of Moorpark (he~eafter "City") in wntmg that. the • applicant • • wishes the City to acquire-an interest in . the land .which is-sufficient for such purposes as provided in Government Code Section 66462.5; b. Supply the City with (i) a legal description of the interest to be acquired,· (ii) a map or diagram of the interest to be acquired sufficient to satisfy the requirements of s~bdivision (e) of Section 1250.310 of the Code of Civil Procedure, (iii) a current appraisal report prepared by an appraiser approved by the City which expresses an opm1on as to the current fair market value of the interest to be acquired, and (iv) a current Litigation Guarantee Report; c. Enter into an agreement with the City, guaranteed by such cash deposits or other security as the City may require, pursuant to .which the applicant will pay all of. the City's cost (including, without limitation, attorney's fees and overhead expenses) of acquiring such an interest in the land. 22 J 81 LDM-10 DP-397 -404 • LAND DIVISION NO.: LDM-10 Siege~.&· Associates, Inc. APPLICANT: DATE:• February 1, 1988 • CITY ENGINEER'S CONDITIONS (Cont'd.) 20. The applicant shall pay all energy costs associated with street lighting for a period of one year from the initial energizing of the street lights. The applicant shall execute a covenant running with the land on behalf of itself and its successors, heirs, and assigns agreeing to participate in the formation of an assessment district or other financing technique. including, but not limited to, the payment oi' traffic miligaliun fot:s, wnici1 lilt: \..,Hy may 1mpiemt:m or ariopr, IO fund public street and traffic. improvements directly or indirectly affected by the development. IN CONJUNCTION WITH APPROVAL OF FINAL MAP, THE FOLLOWING CONDI- TIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED: 21. The applicant shall offer to dedicate on the Map· to the City of Moorpark for public use, all the public· streets right of way. shown on the Map. 22. The applicant shall off er to dedicate on the Final (Parcel) Map to the City· of Moorpark access easements over all private streets shown on the Final (Parcel) Map • to provide access for all governmental agencies providing the public safety, health and welfare. 23, The applicant shall offer for dedication to the City of Moorpark a street easement of sufficient width along Los Angeles A venue to permit an ultimate • ight Qf wa.y of 59 feet~ according to the applicable' v~·riwr~ :CQutity Road Standard Plate B:..2A, north of the centerline , of Los Angeles A venue along the entire frontage of the parent parcel. 24. The applicant shall dedicate on the Final (Parcel) Map· to the City of Moorpark the access rights adjacent to Los Angeles A venue along the entire frontage of the parent parcel except for approved access road(s) as delineated on the approved Tentative Maps. 25. That lot to lot drainage easements and secondary drainage easements shall be delineated on the final map. Assurance shall be provided to the City that these easements will be adequately maintained by property owners to safely convey storm water flows. 23 LAND DIVISION NO.: APPLICANT:· • DATE: CITY ENGINEER'S CONDITIONS (Cont'd.) LDM-10 DP-397 -404 .LDM-10 Siegel & • Associates, Inc. February • 1, 1988 DURING CONSTRUCTION, THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL APPLY: 26. That prior to any work being conducted within the State c; City right of way, the applicant shall obtain an Encroachment Permit from the appropriate Agency. 27. If any hazardous waste is encountered during the construction of this project, all work shall be immediately stopped and the Ventura County Environmental Health Department, the Fire Department, the Sheriff's Department, and the City Inspector shall be notified immediately. Work shall not proceed until clearance has been issued by all of these agencies. 28. Where roads are to be built requring 4 or more inches of pavement, applicant shall construct the required street section minus I -inch of paving as an interim condition until all utility cuts or trenching is completed. The final I -inch cap of asphalt shall be placed after all necessary trenching is completed. 29. If g;ading is to take place during the rainy season, an· erosion control plan shall be submitted for review -and approval along with the grading plan. Along with the erosion control. measures, hydroseeding of all graded slopes shall be required within 60 days of completion of grading. 30. "C'' Street and "D" A venue are to be completely constructed priro • to zone clearance of 25% of the total developable land area within LDM-·10, or by July 1, 1989, whichever occurs first. Regardless of the above time limits, "C" Street and "D" A venue are • to • be completed prior to' zoning clearance of . any lot taking _ access to "D" A venue or "C" • Street, or prior to completion of the· Maureen Lane Signal. 31. To assist the City Engineer in determining when a traffic signal should be installed at the intersection of Los Angeles A venue with Maureen Lane, the developer shall conduct _manual turning counts from 6:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. prior to the issuance of zone clearance for Development Projects corresponding to 40%, 65%, and 90% of the developable portion of the parent parcel. If this information is provided by other sources (City, Caltrans, or other developments) to the City Engineer's satisfaction, part or all 9f this condition may be waived by the City Engineer. 24 183 -LAND PIVISION NO.: .• APPLICANT: DATE: VENTURA COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPARTMENT LDM-10 DP-397 -404 • LDM-10 . Siegel & . Associates, Inc. February 1~ 1988. DURING CONSTRUCTION, THE FOLLOWING CONDITION SHALL BE SATISFIED: 32. Construction equipment, tools, etc., shall be properly secured during non..:working hours. 33. That a six-foot chain link fence shall be erected around the construction site and locked during evening hours and on week-ends when no construction activity is present. 25 LAND DI.VISION NO.: APPLICANT:. ·bATE: VENTURA COUNTY FIRE PROTECTION LDM-10 DP-397 -404 LDM-10 , Sieg~l . &. As$oCiates. Inc. •• February 1. ·1988 PRIOR TO APPROVAL OF FINAL MAP, THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS -SHALL BE SATISFIED: 34. That prior to approval of the final map, the applicant shall provide to the Fire Department verification from the water purveyor that the purveyor can provide the required fire flow for the project. noTr-.o· T~ .,.-,..,-.._. ... ~-..T-~ __ ...,...., '""'-.,.. e ',-,_ ·-.;.,= :...., = •--........ ,.,_ .................... ..._ ___ "a.4"0_,.&..., ....., .... SHALL BE SATISFIED: .. _ = ~ ~ ' • ' ".' .... '. . ..&. '-J~,l,,,,,J'-J '' .L.l ~'-> rr.11...TT"'\TTTA'J..TC '--''\J.l ..,......,,.l. .I. .l.'--'J. ... .., 35. That if the subject parcel is within a Water Purveyor District, w.iter mains capable of providing a fireflow of 4500 GPM at 20 psi shall be installed from the public right of way or from the purveyor point of connection to the street in front of each parcel. The cost of engineering, installation and maintenance of these mains shall be that of the applicant of this division (Parcel Map). This improvement or provisions to . guarantee i'ts installation shall be. completed priro to recordation. Prior to combustible construction on any parcel, the water mains shall be extended to within 150 feet of the building site. A fire . hydrant shall be installed at this location on the access road to the site and it shall be capable of providing the required fire flow. The· owner of the combustible construction is responsible for the cost of this protection installation. DURIN.G CONSTRUCTION, THE FOLLOWING _CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED: 36. That prior to combustible construction, all weather access road/driveway, suitable for use by a 20 ton fire department vehicle shall be installed. This improvement, or provisions to guarantee its installation shall be completed prior to recordation. 37. That the access road shall be of sufficient width to allow for a 40-foot turning radius af all sharp turns in the road. 38. That approved turn-around areas or easements for fire apparatus shall be provided where the access road is 150 feet or farther from the main thoroughfare. 39. That all drives shall have a minimum vertical clearance of 13 feet 6 inches (13' 6"). 40. That street name signs shall be installed in conjunction with the road improvement. The type of sign shall be in accordance with Plate F-4 of Ventura County Road Standards. 26 LAND _DI-VISION NO.: APPLICANT: • DATE: . VENTURA COUNTY FIRE PROTECTION (Cont'd.) LDM-10 DP-397 -404 LDM-10 Siegel & _:Ass~iates, Jnc. • February 1, i 988 41. That hydrants, when installed, shall be 6" x 4" x 4" x 2 1 /2" level barrels. PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY, THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED: 42. That the road shall be named if serving more than five (5) five parcels. The street name(s) shall be submitted to the Fire Department Communication Dispatcher Supervisor for review prior to recordation. 27 LAND DIVISION NO.: Af PLICANT: . DATE: WATERWORKS DISTRICT CONDITIONS · GENERAL REQUIREMENTS: LDM-10 / 87 DP-397 -404 LDM-10 ··Siegel & Associates, Inc. February · l,. ·19·gg 43. All projects shall comply with the District's Rules anJ Regulations including existing or subsequently adopted waste discharge ordinances, policies or procedures. PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A BUILDING PERMIT, THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED: 44. That the District be allowed to review the adequacy and level of service for each project when tenant improvements are requested. Additional facilities, onsite treatment, or other modifications may be required as a condition of certain tenant improvements. 28 LAND DIVISION NO;: ·APP_LICANT; DATE: ••• CALTRANS CONDITIONS LDM-10 DP-397 -404 LDM-10 . Siegel & Associates, Inc. • February 1, 1988 . • PRIOR TO ZONING CLEARANCE, TffE · FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED: 45. Prior to zone clearance, Developer shall make a supplementary contribution to the Los Angeles A venue Area of Contribution in the amount of $65,000, representing half of the estimated project costs to construct a traffic signal at the intersection of Maureen Lane at Los Angeles A venue. When the City Engineer and Caltrans J;.;:~:-::::::.~ !!:.::.: t::-:.ffr-:-s;s~~1 Wftrr:mt~ are satisfied the City will proceed with construction of the signal, with funding to consist of 50% regular AOC funds and 50% Developer's supplementary AOC contribution. 29 180 LAND DIVISION NO.: APPLIC~NT: .·DATE: LDM-10 DP-397 -404 LDM-10 Siegel '& • Associates, Inc. February l~ 1988 VENTURA COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH. DIVISION CONDITIONS PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A ZONING CLEARANCE, THE FOLLOWING CONDI- TIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED: 46. Prior to • issuance of a zone clearance for the inauguration of any use in the proposed structures, such use shall be reviewed and approved by the Ventura County Environmental Health Division. PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY, THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED: 47. The applicant shall ensure that the volume of hazardous waste will be reduced or eliminated by undertaking the following: a. Alter processes to eliminate or reduce the amount of hazardous waste generated. b. Develop_ a waste -excha~ge program. c. Recycle the waste. • ' d. Construct or install on-site hazardous waste treatment facilities. 48. The applicant .· shall ensure • that groundwater poll_ution and other environmental damage will be avoided by undertaking the following: a. Install and maintain proper coiltain~ent. b. Comply with all hazardous • waste generator laws for storage, handling, transportation and disposal. 30 C. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR bP-397 -404 1. Community Development 2. City Engineer 3. City Police 4. Ventura County Fire Protection 5. Ventura County Air Pollution Control District 6. Waterworks District 7. Caltrans 8. Ventura County Environmental Health 31 LDM-10 DP-397 -404 • DEVELOPMENT PLAN PERMIT: l . APPLICANT: •• DATE: DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CONDITIONS GENERAL REQUIREMENTS: LDM-10 DP-397 -404 DP..:397 ·_ 404 · Siegel & ·Associates, Inc ... February I, 1988 1. That permits are granted for the land and projects on the submitted plot plans and elevations. That the location and design of all site improvements shall be as shown • on the approved plot plans and elevations. 2. That unless the projects are inaugurated (building foundation slab in place and substantial work in progress) not later than one (1) year after these permits are granted, these permits shall automatically expire on that date. The Director of Community Development may, at his discretion, grant up to one (I) additional year extension from project inauguration if there have been no changes in the adjacent areas and if permittee can document that he has diligently worked toward inauguration or projects during the initial one-year period. 3. That any minor changes may be .appro~ed by the Director of Community Develop".'" ment upon the filing of a Minor Modification. applic.ation, and the passing before the Planning Commission prior to the appeal period ending. Any Major Modifica- tion is to.•be approved by the. City -~CounciL • • 4. · That the design, maintenance and operation of the permit areas and facilities thereon shall_ comply with an. applicable requirements and enactments of Federal, State, and County and City authorities, and all such requirements. and enactments shall, by reference, become conditions of these permits. 5. That no conditions· of·· these entitlements shall· be interpreted as permitting or . . . • .·-. . . .. . . • . . requiring any violation of law or any . unlawful rules or regulations or orders of an . authorized governmental agency. In instances where more than one set of rules apply, the stricter ones shall take precedence. ' 6. That if any of the conditions or limitations of these development plans are held to be invalid, that holding shall not invalidate any of the remaining conditions or limitations set forth. 7. That the permittees agree as a condition of issuance and use of these permits to def end, at his sole expense, any action brought against the City because of issuance (or renewal) of these permits or in the alternative to • relinquish these permits. Permittees will reimburse the City for any court cost which the City may be required by court to pay as a result of any such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate in the defense of any such action, but such participation shall not relieve permittees of his obligation under this condition. 32 LDM-10 DP-397 -404 • DEVELOPMENT PLAN P_ERMJT: DP-397 -404 Siegel & Associate_s, _ Inc._ . APPLICANT: • DATE:· February· 1; 1-988 • DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CONDITIONS (Cont'd.) 8. That permittees' • acceptance of these permits and/or operation under t~ese permits shall be deemed to be acceptance by permittee of all conditions of these permits. 9. • That the developments are subject to all applicable regulations of the (Limited Industrial) zone and all agencies of the State of California, County of Ventura, City of Moorpark, and any other governmental entities. TIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED: 10. That prior to construction for each project, a zone clearance shall be obtained from the Department of Community Development and a building permit shall be obtained for each project from the Building and Safety Di·vision. 11. .That. prior ·to the' issuance of a -zone clearance, a landscaping and planting plan (3 • _sets)~ together with specifications a1s1ct· maintenance. prograin, prepared by a State· licensed landscape: architect in accordance with County Guidelines for. Landscape Plan . Check, shall be submitted to the Director of Community Development for: review and approval. the applicant shall bear the total ~ost of such review and of final installation inspection. The landscaping and planting plan shall be accompanied by a. fee specified, by the City of Moorpark. All landscaping and planting shall ·-be accomplished -and approved by· the -Director of Community • Development prior to the issuance of any occupancy permit for DP-,397 -404. 12. That, final landscape .plans for each ·project shall provide for ·a 50% shade coverage within all parking areas. Shade coverage is described as the maximum· mid-day shaded area defined by a selected specimen tree at 50% maturity. Landscaping and irrigation shall be provided to the curb adjacent. 13. That all. turf plantings associated with these projects shall be drought tolerant,. low-water using variety. Plantings in and adjacent to parking in vehicular area shall be contained within raised planters surrounded by 6" high concrete curbs. 14. Landscaping shall not obscure any exterior door or window from street view. 15. _ Landscaping at entrances/exits or at any intersection within the parking lot shall not block or screen the view of a seated driver from another moving vehicle or pedestrian. 33 LDM-10 DP-397 -404 D~VELOPMENT PLAN PERMIT: DP-397 -404 Siegel· & Associates, Inc. APPLICANT: . • DATE: February 1, 1988 • DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CONDITIONS (Cont'd.) . . 16. Landscaping (trees) shall not be placed directly under any overhead lighting which could cause a loss of· light at ground level. 17. That all • roof mounted equipment (vents, stacks, blowers, air conditioning equipment) that may extend above any parapet wall shall be enclosed on all four sides by view obscuring material. Prior to the issuance of a zone clearance, the final design of the roof screening and location of any roof mounted equipment of the projects must be approved by the Director of _Co_mm_unity Development. 18. That all trash disposal areas shall be provided in a • 1ocation which will not interfere with circulation, parking or access to the building and shall be screened with a six-(6) foot high, solid wall enclosure with metal gates, final design of said enclosure shall be subject to the approval of the Director of Community Develop- ment prior to the issuance of zone clearance. 19. ihat signs are subj~ct to .the Moorpark Code, Chapter 50, Title 9, Sign Ordin:,mce. A sign permit is required. No building signs. of any type sh~ll be allowed on any building ·wall or window. Only .a monunie!].t sigi:i. shall be permitted for these development • plans and shall not exceed 30 square feet, no higher than 5 feet above average ground level. A sign program shllll be submitted and approved by the Director of Community Development for all signage. 20. Roof design and construction for each project shall include· a minimum 18-inch extension of the parapet wall above the ~ighest point of the. roof . • 21. • Prior to issuance •• • of ·a zoning. clearance,· the final wo_rking drawings shall be submitted to the Director of Community Development for review and approval. 22. For all exterior lighting, a lighting plan shall be prepared • by an electrical engineer __ registered in· the State of California and submitted to the Department of Community Development for review and approval prior to the issuance of a zone clearance. The lighting plan shall achieve the following objectives: A void interference with reasonable use of adjoining properties; minimize to the greatest extent possible on-site glare; provide adequate on-site lighting; limit electroliers height to avoid excessive illumination; provide lighting structures which are compatible with the total design of the proposed facility. 34 LDM-10 DP-397 -404 DEVELOPMENT PLAN PERMIT: •. DJ:l-:397 -404 Siegel· _& Associates, Inc. ·· • February l; 1988 APPLICANT: • DATE: DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CONDITIONS (Cont'd.) These plans include the following: a. A photometric plan showing a point by point foot candle layout . to extend a minimum twenty-(20) feet outside the property lines. Layout plan to be based on a ten-(10) foot grid center. b. Maximum overall· height of pole fixtures shall be not more than twenty (20) feet. c. Fixtures must have sharp cut-off qualities at property lines. d. There shall be no more than a seven to one (7:1) ratio of level of illumination shown. (Maximum to minimum ratio between. Lighting Star.dards.) e. Low pressure energy efficient light fixtures shall be used. • . . , . C Average maximum of one foot .candle illumination. 23. Pullover ·parking (overhangs) shall be limited to 24 inches .maximum. 24. That the appHcant shall construct a utility room(s) with common access to house all meters. • No exterior ladders shall be permitted . . 25. The applicant . shall, prior. to ~e issuance . of. a zone clearance for· each . project, execute. a covenant running with . ~he land on behalf of· itself and-fts. successors·, ... heirs and assigri; agreeing to• participate· in the formation of and be subJect to any assessment district or other financing • technique including but not limited to the payment of traffic mitigation fees, which the City may implement or adopt, to fund public street and traffic improvements directly or indirectly affected by the development. Traffic mitigation fees shall be used for projects such as, but not limited to, the extension of New Los Angeles A venue. 26. That the final design of site improvements for each project, including materials and colors, is subject to the approval of the Planning Commission. 27. That no asbestos pipe ·or construction materials shall be used for the projects entitlement without prior approval of the City Council. 28. Prior to zone clearance, the • applicant.• shall have approval by the Director of Community Development to provide skylights that are as opaque as feasible to minimize potential evening illumination as viewed from the exterior. 35 LDM-10 DP-397 -404 DEVELOPMENT PLAN PERMrI;": DP-397 -404 Siegel & Associates, Inc. APPLICANT: DATE: February l, 1988 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CONDITIONS (Cont'd.) PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A BUILDING PERMIT, THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED: 29. That prior to the issuance of a building permit for each project the developer shall pay all school assessment fees levied by the Moorpark Unified School District. DURING CONSTRUCTION, THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED: 30. That all utilities shall be underground to the nearest off-site utility pole except through transmission lines. 3L -That all" parkjng ·shall :be surfaced with asphalt or concrete and shall.· include ,. adequate provisions. for drainage,-striping and appropriate· wheel blocks or. curbs in parking areas. 32. That at the time water service connection is made for each project, cross connection control • devices shail be instaiied on the water system in accordance with the requirements of the Ventura County Environmental Health Department • PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY, TIIE .FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SIIALL • BE SATISFIED: • 33. That prior to t_he occupancy .or change of-. occupancy or introduction ,of an . additional occupancy of these buildings by the tenants, either. the owner or . . I . prospective tenant shall apply for the use of ~hese buildings. The purpose of the zoning clearance ·shall determine if the proposed uses are compatible with the existing zoning and terms and conditions of these permits. 34. That no later than ten (10) days after any· change of property owner or of tessee(s) or operator(s) of the subject uses, there shall be filed with the Director of Community Development the names(s) and address(es) of the new owner(s) lessee(s) or operator(s), together with a letter from any such person(s), acknowledging and agreeing to comply with all conditions of these permits prior to zone clearance. 35. Prior to occupancy by' any. tenant or subsequent owner that would employ or dispose of hazardous waste or materials, a Major Modification shall be pro<;essed and filed. . l 36 DEVELOPMENT PLAN PERMIT: APPLJCAN.T: DATE: LDM-10 DP-397 -404 DP-397 -404 Siegel & A$sociates, ~~c. February 1; 1988 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNlTY DEVELOPMENT CONDITIONS (Cont'd.)_ 36. AH roof top mechanical equipment and other noise generation sources onsite be attenuated to 55 dBA at the property line. • That prior to the issuance of the certificate of ·occupancy the applicant shall· submit a report to demonstrate to the satisfaction of the Director of Community Development that all onsite noise generation sources have been mitigated to this level. The report shall be prepared by a licensed acoustical engineer in accordance with accepted engineering standards. AFTER ISSUANCE OF A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY, THE FOLLOWING CON- DITIONS -SHALL BE APPLICABLE: 37. That the continued maintenance of the permit area and facilities shall be subject to periodic inspection by the City. The permittee shall be required to remedy any defects in ground maintenance, as indicated by the Code Enforcement Officer within thirty (30) c:iays after notification; 38. No outside storage of any materials· or· overnig-ht • semi-trucks or truck trailers, beyond the loading bays,· of any kind sh~ll be permitted after occupancy. 39. No repair or maintenance of trucks or any vehicle shall occur on the subject sites. 40. Loading and unloading operations shall not be conducted between the hours of 10:00 p.m. and' 6:00 a.m. 37 LDM-10 DP-397 ._ 404 _ DEVELOPMENT . PLAN_·-PERMIT: •. APPLICANT:- i:>P-397 -404 S~egel ~ Associates, Inc. • -oATE: • Feb~ary 1, _1988 CITY ENGINEER'S CONDITIONS .PRIOR TO ZONING CLEARANCE, THE . FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED: 41. The applicant shall submit to the City of Moorpark for review and approval, a grading plan prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer; shall obtain a Grading Permit; and shall post sufficient surety guaranteeing completion. 42. The applicant shall submit to the City of Moorpark for review and approval,-a ·d_etailed Soils Report certified by a registered professional Civil Engineer in the State of California. The grading plan shall incorporate the recommendations of the approved Soils Report. 43. The applicant shall submit to the City of Moorpark for review and approval, street . improvement plans prepared by Registered Civil Engineer;_ shall enter into an agreement with the_ City of Moorpark to complete the improvements; and shall post sufficient surety guaranteeing the· construction of· the improvements. The_. improvements shall i include co_ricrete curb and gutter, sidewal:1<, street lights, striping and signing, paving, and any necessary transitions in accordance with the Ventura County Road Standards. The applicable Road Standard Plates are as follows: a. "C" Street, "D" A venue, "A" Court, and "B" Courf to be constructed per Plate B-3D modified to have 40 feet pavement width and· 50 feet right-of-way width. b. Maureen Lane to be constructed per Plate B-3D. c. All cul-de-saces to be constructed per Plate C-3. d. All ·streets shall have a minimum of 4 inches of asphalt. e. Driveways to be constructed per Plate E-2 and to be 30 feet wide. 44. The applicant shall demonstrate for each building pad to the satisfaction of the City of Moorpark as follows: . a. Adequate protection from 100-year frequency storm; and b. Feasible access during a IO-year frequency storm. 38 DEVELOPMENT PLAN PERMIT: APPLICANT: .· DATE: CITY ENGINEER'S CONDITIONS (Cont'd.)· LDM-10 DP-397 -404 PP-397 -404 · Siegel & Associates. Inc. • February 1, 1988 Hydrology calculations shall be per current· Ventura· County ~tandards. 45. The applicant shall deposit with the City of Moorpark a contribution for the Los Angeles. A venue Improvement Area of Contribution. The actual deposit shall be the then current Los Angeles A venue Improvement Area of Contribution applicable rate at the time the building permit is issued. 46. The applicant shall indicate in writing to the City of Moorpark, the disposition of any water well(s) and any other water that may exist within the site. If any wells are proposed to • be abandoned, or if they are abandoned and have not been properly sealed, they inust be destroyed per· Ventura County Ordinance No. 2372. 47. The applicant shall submit to the City of Moorpark for review and approval, drainage plans, hydro logic, and hydraulic calculations prepared by a • Registered Civil .Engineer; shall enter into • a~. agreement with the City of Moorpark to complete the improvement and shall post sufficient surety guaranteeing the construction of the improvements. The drainage plans and calculations shall indicate the following conditions before and after development. Quantities of water, water flow rates, major water courses, drainage areas and patterns, . diversions, collection systems,. flood hazard areas, sumps and drainage courses. Hydrology shall be per current Ventura County Standards except as follows: a. All. sumps shall carry a 50-year frequency storm; b. All catch basins on continuous grade shall carry a 10-year storm; c. All -catch basins in a sump condition shall be sized such that depth of water at intake shall equal depth of approach flows; d. All culverts shall carry a 100-year frequency storm; e. Drainage facilities shall be provided such that surface flows are intercepted _and contained prior to entering collector or secondary roadways; f. Under a IO-year frequency storm, all collector streets shall be provided with a minimum of one· travel lane with a goal that local, residential streets shall have one travel lane available where possible. 39 ·- C s LDM-10 DP-39_7 -404 DEVELOPMENT PLAN PERMIT: DP-397 -404 Siegel & Associates; Inc: APPLICANT: DATE: February 1, 1988 CITY -ENGINEER'S CONDITIONS (Conttd.) If a travel lane cannot be maintained as described in f. above, the storm drain will be extended and/or additional catch basins provide<;!-to satisfy this condition. 48. The applicant shall pay all energy costs associated with street lighting for a period of one year from the initial energizing of the street lights. 49. The applicant shall have prepared a geotechnical investigation with regard to liquifaction. Per the City's Safety Element, this report shall be prepared by a Registered Professional Civil Engineer or Geologist. 50. _ The applicant shall e_xecute a covenant running with_ the land on behalf_ of itself and its successors, h~irs, .and assigns agreeing to par.ticipate in the. tormatioii of ·an • assessment. :di~t~ict or othei: finapcing _ technique including, bur not limited· to~-, the payment•_ of traffic mitigation fees, which • the City -may implement o~ • adopt, to fund. public street and traffic -improvements directly or indirectly affected by the development. DURING CONSTRUCTION, THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL APPLY: SL That prior to any work being conducted within the State or City right of way, the _ applicant shall obtain an Encr9achnient Permit from the appropriate. Agency .• 52. If_ any hazardous waste is encountered during the construction of this project, all work shall be immediately ·stopped and the Ventura County Environmenta! Health -Department, the: Fire Department, the_ Sheriff's Department; aild the ·city. Inspector shall be notified immediately. Work shall not proceed until clearance has been issued by all of these agencies. 53. Where ro~ds are tc be bt:ilt requiring ~ or more inches of pave111e1H, appiicant shall con~truct the _ required street section minus 1-inch of paving as an interim condition until all utility cuts or trenching is completed. The final I-inch cap of asphalt shall be placed after all necessary trenching is completed. 54. If grading is to take place during the rainy season, an erosion control plan shall be submitted for review and -approval along with the grading plan. Along with _ the erosion control measures, hydroseeding of all graded slopes shall be _ required within 60 days of completion of grading. 40 DEVELOPMENT-PLAN P);:RMIT:_ APPLICANT: -DATE: CITY ENGINEER'S CONDITIONS (Cont'd.) • LDM-10 DP-397 -404 DP-397 -404 Siegel ~-Assoc~ates, Inc. •. February l, 1988 55. "C" Street and "D" A venue are . to be completely constructed priro to zone· clearance of 25% of the total developable land area within LDM-10, or by July 1, 1989, whichever occurs first. Regardless of the above time limits, "C" Street and "D" A venue are to be completed prior to zoning clearance of any lot taking access to "D" A venue or "C" Street, or prior to completion of the Maureen Lane Signal. 56. To assist the City Engineer in determining when a traffic signal should be installed at the intersection of Los Angeles A venue with Maureen Lane, the developer shall conduct manual turning counts from 6:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. prior to the issuance of zone clearance for Development Projects corresponding to 40%, 65%, and 90% of the developable portion of LDM-10. If this information is provided by other sources (City, Caltrans, or other developments) to the City Engineer's satisfaction, part or all of this condition may be waived by the City Engineer. 41 DEVELOPMENT PLAN PERMIT: APPLICANT: DAT'.£: .. CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS LDM-10 DP-397 -404 DP-397 -404 Siegel & • Associates, • Inc. February 1, 1988 DURING CONSTRUCTION, THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL APPLY: 57. A 6-foot high chain fence shall be erected around the construction site. 58. Construction equipment, tools, etc., shall be properly secured during non-working hours. 59. Lighting devices shall be high enough as to eliminate anyone on the ground from tampering with them. All parking areas shall be provided with a lighting system capable of illuminating the parking surface with a minim.um of 1-foot candle of light and shall be designed to minimize the spillage of light onto adjacent properties. All exterior lighting devices shall be protected by weather and breakage-resistant covers. 60. Landscaping at entrances/exits • or at any intersection with the parking lot shall not block or screen the • view of a seated driver from another moving vehicle or pedestrian . . 6L • Landscaping (trees) shall not be placed directly· under any ·overhead lighting which could cause a loss of light at ground level. 62. All exterior doors shall be constructed of solid wood core a minimum of l and 3/4-inches thick or of metal construction. Front glass door(s) commonly used for entry are ac¢eptabie but should be visible to the street. 63. Doors utilizing a cylinder • lock shall have a mm1mum five (5) pin tumbler operation with the locking bar or bolt extending into the receiving guide a minimum of 1 inch. PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED: 64. Address shall be clearly visible to approaching emergency vehicles and mounted against a contrasting color. 65. Address numbers shall be a minimum of 6 inches in height and illuminated during the hours of darkness. 66. There shall not be any easy exterior access to the roof area, i.e., ladders, trees, high walls, etc._ 42 J.OI LDM-10 DP-397 -404 DP-397. -404 DEVELOPMENT. PLAN PERMIT: ·APPLICANT; . . . . • Siegel• & Associate~. Inc. DATE: February 1, 1988 • VENTURA COUNTY FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT CON]>ITIONS • PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF ZONING CLEARANCE, THE • FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED: 67. That building plans of public assembly areas, which have an occupant load of 50. or more, shall be submitted to the Ventura County Bureau of Fire Prevention for review . ........ . •r- ••• --p shall be submitted, with payment for plan check, to the Ventura County Bureau of Fire Prevention for review. 69. That any structure greater· than 5,000 square feet in area and/or 5 miles from a fire station shall be provided with an automatic fire sprinkler system in • accordance with Ventura County Ordinance #14 . • • DURING CONSTRUCTION, THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: 70. That a width of 25 feet shall be provided for all streets and driveways. 71. That access roads shall be installed with an all weather surface, suitable for access by fire department apparatus. . . 72. • That .all drives shall have a minimum vertical clearance of 13 feet, 6 inches (13'. 6"). 73. That approved turri around areas for fire apparatus shall be provided where· the access road is 150 feet or farther from the main thoroughfare. A turn around is needed for the Community Drive. 74. That prior to construction, the applicant shall submit plans to the Ventura County Bureau of Fire Prevention for approval of the location of fire hydrants. Show existing hydrants on plan within 300 feet of the development. 75. That fire hydrants shall be installed and in service prior to combustible construction and shall conform to the minimum standards of the County Water Works Manual. a. Each hydrant shall be a 6-inch wet barrel design and shall have one 4-inch and two 2 1/2-inch outlet(s). 43 LDM-10 DP-397 -404 DEVELOPMENT PLAN PERMIT: DP-397 -404 Siegel -& Associates, Inc. APPLICANT: DATE: February l; 1988 VENTURA COUNTY FIRE ·PROTECTION DISTRICT CONDITIONS (Cont'd.) b. The required fire flow shall be achieved at no less than 20 psi • residual • pressure. c. Fire hydrants shall be spaced 300 feet on center, and so located that no structure will be farther than 150 feet from any one hydrant. d. Fire hydrants shall be recessed in from curb face 24-inches at center. 76. That plans for the installation of an automatic fire extinguishing system (such as, halon or dry chemical) shall be submitted to the Ventura County Bureau of Fire Prevention for review to insure. proper installation. PRIOR ·ro ISSUANCE '·OF A BUILDING·. PERMIT, THE -FOLLOWING. CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED: 77. That the minimum fire flow required is determined by the type of building construction, proximity to other structures, fire walls, and fire protection devices provided, as specified by the I.S,O, Guide for Determining • Required Fire Flow. Given the present plans and•. information, the required fire flow· ·is _approximately 2000 gallons per minute .. • The applicant shall· verify. that the water . purveyor can provide the· required quantity at the project. • • PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY, THE -FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE .SATISFIED: 78. That all .grass or brush exposing 'any structures shall· be cleared for a distance of 100 feet prior to framing, according to the Ventura County Weed Abatement Ordinance. 79. Th~!" ~[!~:-~.~~ ;-;~.~;-;;!-,~;-~, _ :u_HLHu'l.i.u.1 01 v .;.H.._11~~ ~11.f)~i, ;;i«:i,.u u;;;; inst:a.lieci prior {O occupancy, shall be of contrasting color to the background; and shall be readily visible at night. Where structures are setback more than 250 feet from the street, larger numbers will be required so that they are distinguishable from the street, the address number(s) stiall be posted adjacent to. the driveway entrance. 80. That a plan shall be submitted to the Ventura County Bureau of Fire Prevention for review indicating the method in which buildings are to • be identified by address numbers. 81. That fire extinguishers shall . be installed in accordance with National Fire. Protection Association, Pamphlet #f0~· The placement of..extinguishers shall be reviewed by th~ • Fi;e Prevention Bure~u. 44 . DEVELOPMENT PLAN PERMIT: . APPLICANT:·. DATE: •. LDM-10 DP-397 -404 DP--397 -404 Siegel_ & _As~ociates, Inc. February l; 1988 VENTURA COUNTY FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT CONDITIONS (Cont'd.) 82. That prior to recordation of street names~ names shall be submitted to the Bureau of Fire Prevention for review. 83. That street signs shall be installed prior to occupancy. 45 DEVELOPMENT PLAN PERMIT: .. APPLICANT::· DATE: LDM-10 DP-397 -404 DP-397 -404 • . Siegel & Associates, Inc . • February 1, 1988 VENTURA COUNTY AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT CONDITIONS PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A BUILDING PERMIT, THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED: 84. The District shall be notified at the time of original occupancy and each time there is a new tenant leasing space from the projects so the District may review activities and materials to be warehoused or manufactured. 46 • DEVELOPMENT PLAN PERMIT NO.: • . APPL.ICANT: .DATE: WATERWORKS DISTRICT CONDITIONS GENERAL REQUIREMENTS: LDM-10 DP-397 -404 DP-397 -404 Siegel • & Associates, Inc . February 1, 1988 85. All future tenants shall comply with the District's Rules and Regulations including existing or subsequently adopted waste discharge ordinances, policies or procedures. PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A BUILDING PERMIT, THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED: 86. That the District be allowed to review the adequacy and level of service for each project when tenant improvements are requested. Additional facilities, onsite treatment, or other modifications may be required as a condition of certain tenant improvements. 47 DEVELOPMENT PLAN PERMIT: APPLICANT: DATE: CAL TRANS CONDITIONS . LDM-10 DP-397 -404 DP-397 -404 . • Siegel· &, • Associates, Inc: · February 1. 1988 PRIOR TO ZONING CLEARANCE, THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED: 87. Prior to zone clearance. Developer shall make a supplementary contribution to the Los Angeles A venue Area of Contribution in the amount of $65,000, representing half of the estimated project costs to construct a traffic signal at the intersection of Maureen Lane at Los Angeles A venue. When the City Engineer and Cal trans uci.tuuim:: ihai i.raffi~ signai warranrs are sarisfieci the City win proceed with construction of the signal, with funding to consist of 50% regular AOC funds and 50% Developer's supplementary AOC contribution. 48 DEVELOPMENT PLAN PERMIT: APPLICANT: ·. DATE:· LDM-10 DP-397 -404 DP-397 -404 Siegel & Associates, Inc. • February I, 1988 · VENTURA COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL HEAL TH DIVISION CONDITIONS PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A ZONING CLEARANCE, THE FOLLOWING CONDI- TIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED: 88. Prior to issuance of a zone clearance for the inauguration of any use m the proposed structures, such use shall be reviewed and approved by the Ventura County Environmental Health Division. PKlUR TU OCCUPANCY, THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED: 89. The applicant shall eneure that the volume of hazardous waste will be reduced or eliminated by undertaking the following: a. Alter processes to eliminate or reduce the amount of hazardous waste generated. b. Develop a waste ~xchange program. c. Recycle the waste. d. Construct or install on-site hazardous waste treatment facilities. 90. The applicant shall ensure that groundwater pollution and other environmental damage will be avoided by undertaking the following: . . a. • Install • and maintain proper containment. b. Comply with all hazardous waste generator laws for storage, handling, transportation and disposal. 49 p, • RESOLUTIONS l_. Mitigated Negative Declaration for LDM-10 2. Mitigated Negative Declaration for DP-397 -404 3. Approval of LDM-10 4. Denial Without Prejudice of DP-397 -404 50 LDM-10 DP-397 -404 E.· TRAFFIC REPORTS L LDM-10 2. DP-397 . -404 F. INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION I. LDM-10 2. DP-397 -404 CITY Of MCORPARK DEPAR'IMENT OF cx:M1UNITY DEVELOPMENT 799 r-coRPARK AVENUE ~RPARK, CALIFORNIA 93021 NEGATIVE DECLARATION .-X-MITIGATED NF.GATIVE DECLARATION L PROJECT DESCHlP'l'lON: 1. • Entitlement; 1. Parcel Map (LUM) 2, Development PJao· Perron 391-404 2. A.")Olicant; . Sie2el and Associates, Inc, 3-Proposal; _l.Re-subdivisjon of three (3) existing industrial zoned lots info tl1..e.»ty-si x ( 26) lots. Parcel Map eotitJ eroeot request, 2. Development Plan Permit far eight (8) separate (see attachtl.-sh~ 4. Location and Parcel Nunber(s): • • .. 511-07-23-35-36 Buildings located on eastside of Ma.nreeri Lane, _ north of Los Angel es Avenue, 5. Responsible Agencies: City of Moorpark ~. ,.,._, ,, .-.r.,__ ~ j, .A.•-----~--. An initial study was conducted by the Department of Conmunity Oeveloprent to evaluate the potential effects of fhis project upon the environrrent. Based upon. the findings contained in the attached .initia:l study it has been determined that this project could, could not, have a significant effect upon the environrrent. • MITIGATED.NEGATIVE DECLARATION ONLY: These potentially significant irtpacts can be satisfac;:torjly mitigated through adoption of the following identified rreasures as conditions of approval. MITIGATION MEASURES IN'.:LUDED TO AVOID POTENl'IALLY SIGN!FICAN'I' EFFECTS: ( IF APPLICABLE) • See Attached III. . PUBLIC REVIEW: . ' 1. Legal· Notice Method; feet. Direct mailing to property owners w1thin 300 2. Docurent Posting Period; "IIJ]Jf¼DattL~s Duane A. Morita Contract Planner Sanchez Talarico Approved by: (Narre) ( Date) Patrick J. Richards Director of Community Development City of Moorpark NOTICE. OF PREPARATION OF DRAFT NEGATIVE DECLARATION TO CONCERN PARTIES: The City of Moorpark is currently processing the following land use permit request. California State Law requires that an evaluation be conducted to determine if this project could significantly affect the environment. Based ~pon an initial review, it has been found that a significant affect would not occur; therefore, a Negative Declaration has been prepared. PROJECT DESCRIPTION Entitlement: 1. Parcel Map (LDM 10) 2. Development Plan Permit 397-404 Applicants Name: Siegel and Associates, In~. Parcel Size: Assessors Parcel No. ( s) : 511-07-23-35-36 Zoning De~ignation: M-2 • General Plan Designation:I-1 Project. Location: Buildings located on eastside of Maureen Lane north 6f Los Angeles Avenue. ·oescriptioh of Land Use That Would Result If Permit Is Approved:· l.Re-subdivision of three (3) existing individual zoned lots into twenty-six (26)lots. Parcel Map entitlement request. 2. Development Plan permit for eight (8) separate industrial buildings with a total floor (see attached sheet) The public reyiew period for the draft Negative Declaration is from January 20, 1988. to February 4, 1988 I you have any questions or comments regarding the project or adequacy of the draft Negative ·oeclaration, please call or write, Patrick Richards. Director Dept. of Community Developmeot 799 Moorpark Avenue, Moorpark, CA. 93021, (805) 529-6864. • Copies of this draft Negative Declaration may be reviewed or purchased at the above address . . ·~Date., •/ 1/.tt);'f>b Duane A. orita ~ ,. Contract ·Planner _ Sanchez Talarico Assoc., Inc. Attached Sheet 1. Project Description 3; Proposal;· indus):rial buildings with a total floor. a·rea of 228, 270 s.f. Buildings will have office, .warehouse,· and manufacturing uses. Description of Land Use That Would Result If Permit Is Approved: 2. ·area of 228, 270 s.f. Buildings will have office, warehouse, and manufacturing uses. CITY OF MOORPABK .•• INITIAL STUDY CHECKLIST FORM I. BACKGRotrnp/ 1. Name of Applicant Si e&e} and Associates. I_nc. ·2. Project Description Re~subdivision of three (3) existing industri~l zuned lots into twenty-six (26) lots. Parcel hap entitlement: request-LDM 10 Development Plan Permit ( DP 397-404) for eight (8) separate industrial buildin2s with a total floor area of 228, 270 s~f. Buildings will have office, warehouse, and manufacturing uses. 3. Date of Checklist submittal J anuar_y 20 ,, , 1988 4. Project Location Buildings located on eastside of Maureen Lane, north of.· Los Angeles Avenue. II. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS (Exp·lanations of all "y~~" and "maybe" answers are reqaj.red on attached sheets.) I ••• YES MAYBE NO 1. EARTH. Will the proposal result in: ' a. b. c. Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic substructures? . . . Disruptions, d;spl~cements._ _compactit>n or· overcovering of the soil? X· ·- Change in topography or ground surface X relief features? - --,. - d. The destruction, covering or modification of ___ ..L e. £. any unique geologic or physical features? Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils, X either on or off the site? . f Changes in deposition. or erosion of beach sands, or changes in situation, deposition or erosion which may modify the channel of a.'river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay, ·inlet or lake? • ' g. Exposure of people or property to geologic hazards such as earthquakes, landslides, mud- slides, ground failure, or similar hazards? L 2. Am. Will the proposal result in:· a. Substantial air emissions .or deterioration of ambient air quality? b. The creation of objectionable odors? c. Alteration of air movement, moisture·or temperature, or any change in climate, either locally or regionally? d. Is there a potential ror cumulative adverse impacts on d.i. .. 'i~;::.l.'..:~0 .,,., the project area? 3 .. WATER. Will the proposal result in: a. Change.s in currents, or the ·course of direction of water movements, in either marine or fresh •• waters? b. Changes in absorption rates,. drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface runoff?· c. Alterations to the course or flow.of Uood waters? \ \ \ d. Change in the amount of surface water in. any water body? e. D~scharge into surface waters, or in any c1lteration of surfl;lce water qualitt, including· but not •limited· to temp·erature, .dissolved oxygen or turbidity? • f. Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of gro.und waters? g. Change in the quantity of groun4 waters, either throug~ direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? h. Degradation of ground water quality? i. Substantial reduction in the amount of water otherwise available for public water supplies? j .. Exposure of people or property to water related hazards such as flooding or tidal waves? YES MAYBE NO X • X ...x.. .x. X X ·x X X .L .L J. 4. PLANT LIFE. Will the proposal r·esult in: a. Charige.s in the diversity of species or number of any species of plants (including trees, shrubs, grass, crops, and aquatic plants? b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of plants? c. Introduction of new species of plants into an area, or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing species? d. Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? 5. ANIMAL LIFE. Will the proposal result in: a. Change in the diversity of species or numbers of any species of animals (birds, land animals including reptiles, fish andsh~llfish, benthic organisms or i~sects)? b. Restrict the range of or otherwise affect any ~ or endangered animal specfes? ·. c. Introduction of new species of animals into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration . or movement of animals? d. Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife l).abitat? 6. NOISE. Will the proposal result in: a. Increases in existing noise levels? b. Exposure of people to severe noise levels? 7.: LIGHT AND GLARE. Will the proposal produce new . light or glare? I . I 8. LAND USE. Will the proposal result in a substantial alteration of the present or planned land useof an area? 9. NATURAL RESOURCES. Will the proposal result in: a. Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? b. Substantial depletion of any nonrenewable resource? ·-•-·, ,-.. YES • MAYBE NO ·--· X X ..:..X. ....x X X X •• 10. RISK OF UPSET. Will the proposal involve: - -a. A risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances (includlng, but not lindted to, oil, pesticides, chemicals or radiation)·in the event of an accident or upset conditions? 11. POPULATION. Will the proposal alter the location, distribution, density or growth rate of the human population of an area? 12. HOUSING. Will the proposal affect existing housing, or create a <l~maud fo~ additional housing? 13. TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION. Will the proposal result in: .a. Cene~ation of substantial additional vehicular --movement? b. Effects on existing parking facilities or demand for new parking? c. Substantial impact upon existing transpo_rtation 1 systems? \ d. Alterations to present patterns of circulation or • movement of people and/ or goods? - e. Alterations to waterborne, rail or ai~ traffic? f. Increase in traffi~ hazards to moto_r -vehicles; bicyclists or pedestrians? 14. PUBLIC SERVICES. Will the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered governmental servies in any of the following areas: a. Fire pro~ection? b. Police protectidn? c. Schools? d. Parks or other recreational facilities? e. Other governmental services? 15. ENERGY. Will the proposal result in: a. Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? -YES -MAYBE NO X X X X X X X X X X X X b. Substan~ial·tncreas~. in .demand upon exi:sting sources of energy or require the.development of new sources of energy? 16. . UTll.ITIES. Will the proposal result in a need for new systeJllS, or substantial .alterations to the following utilities: a. Power or natural gas? b. Communications system? c. Water? d. Sewer or septic tanks? e. Storm water drainage·? f. Solid waste and disposal? g. Street lighting annexation and/or improvements? 17. HUMAN HEALTH. Will the proposal result in: a. Creation of ·any health hazard or potential healb):l hazard (excluding mental health)? ' . . . b. • Exposure of people to potential health hazards? 18. AESTHETICS. Will the proposal result in th_e obstruc- _tion o_f any -scenic vi_sta or view open to the public, . . or will the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive ·site.open to public view? 19. RECREATION. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunifies? 20. ARCHAEOLOGICAL/HISTORICAL. Will the proposal: a. Affect possible unknown archaeological or historic~ al sites? b. Result in destruction or alteration of a known archaeological or historical site within the vicinity of the project? c. Res'ult in destruction or alteration of. a_known -archaeological or histor_ical site near the vicinity of the project? YES MAYBE NO X X X X X X X :-- X _x X X X X ·- X -YES MAYBE NO 21. ·MANDATOR.Y·FINDINGSOF.SIGNUICANCE. a. Does the project have the potential to· degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustai11:lng levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal.conununity, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? b _· D-~P~ t-h~ ?rnje~t::-have the potential to achieve short-term, to.the disadvantage of long-term, environmental goals? (A short-term impact on the environment is one which occurs in a relatively brief, definitive period of time while long-term impacts will endure well into the future.) c. Does the project have impacts which are individu- .ally limited, but cumulatively considerable? {A project may impact on two or more separate resources where· impact ori. ea-.h resource is 1 , relatively small, but where the effect of the 1 -· total of those impacts on the environment is significant.) d. Does the project have environmental effects which will cause subst·antial adverse effects . ori ll~n beings, eith~r directly _or indirectly.· . . .· . III. RECOMMENDATION On the basis of this initial evaluation: X In confonnance with Section 15060 of the State EIR Guidelines, I find with certainity that the proposal would not have a significant impact on the environment. I find the proposed project is categorically exempt pursuant to class I find the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant eff~ct on the environment, and· a NEGATIVE DECLARATION. should be prepared . . _x_ I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on.the environment, there wi,11 not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached X X sheet could be applied to the project. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION SHOULD·BE PREPARED. I .. find proposed pr~ject MAY.have a significant effect on the environment. and. an EW[.lRONMENTAL iMPACT REPORT is requited. . ..: . . . ·.. . . . . .~ -. I find proposed project MAY.have a·si~ifi~ant· effect on the environment, and an ADDE!(DUM to an existing certified Environme~tal Impact Report is required . . I find the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment., and this effect is adequately addressed in a certified Environmental Impact Report, and thus _SUBSEQUENT USE of the existing EIR is required. • . I.·• i • INITIAL STUDY RESPONSES • LDH 10 DP 397-404 Land Division Moorpark (LDM) 10 resubdivides three existing industri_al lots into twenty-six lots. Eight separate industrial buildings will be constructed on eight of the twenty-six· lots. These,industrial buildings require Development Plan.Per- mits (DP 397-404). The ·Initial Study discusses both proposed actions LDM 10 and DP 397-404. The Initial Study also discusses the ultimate development of LDM.10. The following section discusses the yes, maybe, and no responses given in the Initial Study prepared for LDM 10 and DP 397-404. 1. a. A limited amount of grading would be required due to the flat topography of the site. LDM 10 and construction of DP 397-404 structures would not result in unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic substructures. Grading is not anticipated· to adversely impact the project. The Soils Engineering Report pre- pared-for· LDM 10 indicated that ·the soils found onsite is .suitable for development . . ! 1. b. There is the possibility of compaction, disrupti~n, and overcover- ing of soils due to grading operations associated with the ulti- mate development of LDM 10 and DP 397-404. Al_l grading is antici- pated-to be.balanced onsite. All grading will be done in accor"'. danc-e •• with approved City standards .. Grading is not: anticipated to adverse),.y impact the project. The Soils Engineering_ Report pre- pared .. £o_r • LDM. 10 indicated -that the ·soils found onsite are suit,-. able for. development.·. • 1.c .. 1.d. The LDM 10 features. related to topography area is flat, with no visible ground surface relief Minor modifications to the earth surface may occur landscaping and drainage. No major alterations to the are 'anticipated to occur. There are no k'nown The proposed ac;tions ing, or modification unique geologic or physical features onsite. would not result in the destruction, cover- of unique features. l.e. During construction of DP 397-404, 40,000 cubic yards of grading is anticipated to occur. The.re may be a substantial increase in wind or water erosion of soils due to necessary e·arth movement. Grading activi~y will comply with the "Standard Grading Specifica- tions" detailed in the Soils Engineering Report.to minimize the incidence of erosions. 1.f .•• 1.g. • In th~t no be~_ch sands, ·rivers, streams: oceans:, • or bays exi~t onsite, the proposed actions would not result in changes to any of these features. No geologic or seismic hazards are known to exist onsite or within the. immediate 'Vicinity. DP 397-404 and the ultimate development of LDM 10 wou14:not result in exposure of people or property to geologic or seismic hazards. 2.a. DP 397-404 and the ultimate development of LDM 10 would not emit significant amounts of pollutants. Some emissions due to increased vehicular traffic will occur. Levels will be minimal, since increased vehicular traffic will not be extensive. The structures wouia not result in substantial air emissions or dete- rioration of ambient air quality. 2.b. 2.c. 2.d. In that the proposed actions would not emit significant amounts of poliutants;_objectionable odors would not be created. DP 397-404 and the ultim~te development of LDM 10 would consist of construction of1 office, warehouse, and manufacturing uses. It ~~uld not r~sul.t in an alteration of air movement, moisture, or temperature or any change in cl;i.mate, either locally or region- ally. The structures are part of·an industrial park area. The proposed· projects are not expected to create cumulative adverse impacts on .air quality in the project area due to the relatively non-pollu- ·tant nature of the projects. ·However, the -additional employment base will result in additional traffic to the City of Moorpark . . Mit:i.gation m~asures have been incorporated into the project which . wn1 • mitigate: thi_s cwnul'ative impact to. the extent feasible. 3. a. No marine or fresh waters are present on·· the LDM 10 site. There would be no change in currents or the course of direction of such water bodies. 3.b. LDM 10 represe~ts a change in land use from vacant land to approx- imately 42.5% lot coverage. This may result in a change in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface runoff.' Adequate flood control is provided by an existing storm drain system. 3.c. Concrete catc~ basins and an underground drain to Ventura County Flood· Control_, Channel will provide protection from adverse changes. DP 397-404 and the ultimate development of LDM 10 would not alter the course or flow of flood water. •. 3.d. 3.e. 3.f. 3.g. 3.h. 3. i. 3.j. I • ,• • • • DP 397~4.04 and :;the 'ultimate •• '.develop~ent 'of LDM 10 would not alter the course or flow.of flood water. Concrete catch. basins and an underground drain to Ventura County Flood Control will provide protection from adverse changes. Ail excess onsite water would be diverted to existing storm drains to the Flood Control Channel. DP 397-404 and the ultimate devel- opment ·of LDM 10 would not result in discharge to surface waters, or in any alteration of surface water quality, including but not limited to temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity. The construction and operation DP 397-404 and the ultimate devel- opment of LDM 10 would not alter the direction or rate. of flow or any Known grounowacers. wacer is provicieci by the Ventura County Waterworks District No. l; no wells would be constructed. No aquifers are located onsite. DP 397-404 and the ultimate development of LDM 10 would obtain water from the Ventura County Wa~erworks Diatrict No. 1. The pro- .jects would.n<?t change the quantity. of groundwater either through direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of-an aquifer by cuts. or excavations.· . DP 397-404 and . the ultimate development of • LDM 10 would obtain ' water from the Ventura County Waterworks Dist:rict No. 1. The pr.o- ject would be served by existing 10" water mains in Maureen Lane. DP 397-404 and the ultimate development of LDM 10 would not result in a substantial reduction i~ the amount of water otherwise available for public use. Adequate capacity and water pressure exist to .serve ·.the site. No additional constraints fo:r fire pro- • tection are kno~ to exist. DP 397-404 and the ultimate development of LDM 10 is served by the Ventura County Flood Control District (VCFCD). The VCFCD provides adequate service to the .site. No flood hazards are anticipated as a result of the proposed project. 4.a. No trees would.,be removed with implementation of DP 397-404 and the ultimate development of LDM 10. The project would not change the diversity of species or number of any species of plants. 4.b. There are no known unique, rare, or endangered species onsite. Therefore, the· DP 397-404 and the ultimate development of LDM 10 would not result in the reduction of any of these types of species. 4.c. DP 397-404 and the ultimate development of LDM 10 includes the introduction of new plant sp_ecies to be. utilized. for landscaping. The proposed structures would not present a barrier to the pormal replenishment of onsite vegetation. 5.a. No crops . ultimate in acreage currently exis.t on the LDM io site·.. DP 397-404 and .the development of LDM 10 would not result in the reduction of any agri~ultural crops· .. No species of animals are than, possibly, rodents species are known to exist • not change. the diversity animals. known to exist on the LDM 10 site .other and reptiles. • No • rare or endangered onsite .. Therefore, DP 397.-404 would of species or numbers of any species of 5.b. No rare or endangered species are known to exist on the LDM 10 site. Therefore, DP 397-404 and the ultimate development of LDM 10 would not restrict the range of, or otherwise affect, these species. 5.c. 5.d .. • 6.a. 6.b ..• 7. 8. Introduction of animal species is not proposed with DP 397-404 and the ultimate development of LDM 10. No animal species are known to exist on the LDM 10 site. The proposed project would not introduce new animal species er result in a b3rrier to the migra- tion of movement of animals. There -are no. known existing fish or wiidlife habitats on the. LDM 10:stte:· Therefore·,· I>P 397:;,404··and the ultimate developmertt of LDM 10 would no't deteriorate these habitats. Warehousing and office activities are-typically passive. No sig- nificant incre'ase in existing noise levels is anticipated. Increase in existing noise levels due to manufacturing could be lessened through.-proper installation· of facilities and through muffling of large·machinery. Warehousing,. -iitahufacturin.g, and office. activ-ities withiri .. the-pro- posed •facilities would not exceed surrounding noise levels. Therefore, DP 397-404 and the ultimate development of LDM 10 would not result in exposure of people to severe noise levels. The LDM 10 sit,e is currently vacant and has no onsite lighting. DP 397-404 and the ultimate development of LDM 10 would introduce lighting associated with parking areas and illumination of the new facilities. Mitigation has been proposed which reduces this impact to the extent feasible. The DP 397-404 is currently planned as part of an industrial park area. The LDM 19 site is currently vacant. The existing sur- rounding uses include, primarily, manufacturing uses. Future uses include other office, manufacturing, and warehousing facilities. The. projects would, therefore, result in an alteration of existing land use, but: is consistent with the planned industrial land use· of the area. ~ DP 397-404 and the· :ultimate development of LDM 10 would not be utilizing any natural resources. Therefore, the proposed project would not result in an increase in the rate of .use of any natural resources. 9.b. DP 397~404 and the ultimate development of LDM 10 would not use 10. 11. 12. 13.a. 13.b. 13.c. • substantial· or nonrenewable resources. Therefore, the proposed project would not result in a substantial depletion of these resources. DP 397-404 and the ultimate development of tDM iO is not expected to create a risk of upset in the LDM 10 site due to the relatively non-hazardous nature of the project. The proposed projects would create new employment opportunities. This could possibly alter the location, distribution, density, or growth rate of the human population in the area including reloca- tion for employment of the employee and family. The proposed projects would create new employment opportunities. This could poss{bly affect existing housing, or. create a demand for additional .housing. The demand is· anticipated to be associ-• a:ted locally by the amount .of residential construction presently in process; The average dai1ly trips associated with. employee traffic. and truck traffic created by DP 397-404 and the ultimate development of LDM 10 will generate additional vehicular movement. The street system in the vicinity is presently operating at relatively high· levels of service. Additional traffic due to the project will not sig- nifi~ntly adversely impac;:t _the area's street system. ·Alternative· . means··. of t:r;-ans·po:rtation • will . be encouraged • to· reduce vehicle • trips. Increased: traffic will ·warrant .the ins.tallation of a traf- fic signal control at the corner of Los Angeles Avenue and Maureen Lane. DP 397-404 would construct 98 parking spaces to provide for employee and truck parking onsite. This parking would meet City requirements. _The proposed project would not result in a demand for other new parking offsite. Any new development in the City of Moorpark will have some impact on the present transportation system. The street system is pres- ently operating at relatively high levels of service; conse- quently, additional traffic may substantially impact existing transportation systems. Mitigation to reduce this impact to a level of insignificance has been proposed and is attached for review. -:--13.d. 13.e. 13.f. 14.a. 14.b. 14.c. 14.d. 15.a. 15.b. 16.a. 16.b. 16.c. In that all ::roa;ds to and • from DP 397 -404 and the Ll)M 10 site haye • alr.eady been bullt, the propos-ed project would not result in. • alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of· people and/or goods. There would be no waterborne, rail, or air traffic associated with the DP 397-404 and the ultimate development of LDM 10. Therefore, the proposed project would not alter these types of traffic. DP 397-404 and the-ultimate development of LDM 10 would minimally increase the amount of automobile and truck traffic in the area. It could present an increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists, or pedestrians. Effective use of setbacks and sight ~ • • -,,. ~ , -~ ~ - -~ -.&... ---.,,._.~ -, ,_ -----...::, - U.Lt;l.cl.lll;t:: l;.L.Ll.t::.L.Lcl. W.L.L.L W.Lill.11.L;{.t:: J::-IUl.t::Ul..La..L Ud;£.cU.U.:>., The addition of new buildings and employees would not require the need for additional fire protection personnel in the area. The addition of, new buildings and employees _would not req1J_ire the need for addittpnal police protection personnel in the area . . The probable-influx of people (as employees) DP -397.:404 ·and ·the ultimate developillent re~uire the need for new schools in the area. -associated with the of· LDM 10 would not The probable in.fl~ of people (as employees) associated with the DP 397-404 and the ultimate development of LDM 10 would not neces- sitate the development of new parks or other recreational facili- ties. DP 397-404 with 228,270 s.f. of office, manufacturing; and ware- hc>Us~ uses and ·t_he ultimate_ development of. LDM 10,. would not result in the·use. of substantial amounts of fuel or ene:rgy. DP 397-404 with 228,270 s. f .. of office, manufacturing, and ware- house uses and the ultimate development of LDM 10, would not require· a substantial increase in demand upon existing sources of energy or require the development of new sources of energy. i I· DP 397-404 and the ultimate development of LDM 10 would not create excessive demands on the existing power or natural gas system, but would require hookup to existing system lines. DP 397-404 and the ultimate development of LDM 10 would not create excessive demands on the existing communication system, but would require hookup to existing system lines. DP 397-404 and the ultimate development of LDM 10 would not create excessive demands on the existing water system, but would require hookup to existing system lines. · 16. d> • DP 397:404 and the· ultimat~ ·developm~nt of LDM 10 would not creatE! excessive demands oh the existing sewer .or $eptic tank system, ·but would require hookup to existing system lines. • 16.e. 16.f. 16.g. 17.a. 17.b. 19. 20.a. 20.b. 20.c. 21.a. DP 397-404 and the ultimate development of LDM 10 would not create excessive demands on the existing storm water drainage system, but would require hookup to existing system lines. DP 397-404 and the ultimate development of LDM require city solid waste collection and disposal. be done by a private collection service. 10 would not Disposal would DP 397-404 and the ultimate development of LDM 10 would require additional street lighting. DP 397-404 and. the ultimate development of LDM 10 would not be using any materials that would result in the creation of any health hazards or potential health hazards. DP 397-404 and the ultimate development of LDM 10 is not expected to expose people to health hazards due to the non-hazardous nature of the project .. ·DP· 397-404 and the ultimate development of LDM 10 is not. expected to-disrupt the continuity of open space in the area. The project is part of an ,industrial park area and extensive landscaping will be proviaea oy the structures located in the park, thus, creating an aesthetically pleasing environment. DP 397~404 and the ultimate development of LDM 10 would no~ result in an impact upon the quality or quantity of existing recreational op_portunities .. No archaeological the LDM 10 site. ment of LDM 10 resources. . No archaeological the LDM 10 site. development of LDM resources. or historical artifacts are known to exist on Therefore, DP 397-404 and the. ultimate develop- will not affect archaeological or historical or historical artifacts are known to exist on Therefore, DP 397-404 project and the ultimate 10 will not affect archaeological or historical There are no known archaeological or historical sites near the vicinity of the LDM 10 site. The proposed project would not result in.destruction of these resources. The project is not located in an area where it could impact bio- logical, or cultural resources. 21.c. 21.d. ·The pt-oject wiil haye long:.term benefits ·to the City· of Mo.orpark-. Short-term visual impacts are· likely to be prevalent until the stretch of industrial development is completed along Los Angeles Avenue . . A cumulative impact may result with respect to traffic. The pro- ject alone is not expected to significantly impact the vicinity or the City as a whole. The project will have a cumulative impact when considered with other past, present, and reasonably foresee- able future projects._ A cumulative impact·may result with respect to air quality due to increased traffic. This project will not ha.ve envirorunent!'!_l effects which will cause substantial adverse effects or pose a health hazard to human beings. 1. • MITIGATED NEGATIVE. DECLARATION:- LDM·. 10 and DP '397-404 - MITIGATION.MEASURES The applicant shall be subject to requirements set forth by the Ventura County Air Pollution Control District as modified by the City of Moor·- park. 2. The applicant shall provide exterior lighting with shields that face down, or are otherwise so directed, to reduce evening and nighttime light and glare from offsite locations. 3. The applicant shall locate potentially volatile or hazardous materials in a protected area away :from areas occupied -by employees, • delivery persons or -any other person known to be in the vicinity for a reason- able period of time. Materials, as noted above, shall be stored and located in fully pro~ected enclosures. . .• . 4. The. applicant shall encourage _alcernative means of transportation to r_:educe automobile trips to the facility by providing common area bike racks. ·s.-To the extent feasible, the ·applicant: shall soften the architectural lines of the proposed project_ and provide__ substaritiai landscaping in excess of City st:anoards in order to reduce the vi·sual impact created by the bulk of the new building. 6. The applicant shall use reduced wattage light fixtures to avoid night- time glare on residential uses and on motorists along ·Los· Angeles Ave- nue. 7. Prior to zone clearance; Developer shall make' a· s..ipplementa_ry contribu:. • tion to • the Los·· Angeles Avenue Area of Contribution in· the amount of $65,000, representing half of the estimated project costs to construct a traffic signal at-the intersection of Maureen Lane at Los Angeles Avenue. When the C_ity Engineer and Cal trans determine that traffic signal warrants are satisfied the City will proceed with construction of the signal, with funding to consist of 50% regular AOC funds and 50% Develop.er' s supplementary AOC contribution. • B. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 1. Community Development 2. City Engineer 3. Ventura County Sheriff 4. Ventura County Fire Protection 5. Ventura County Division Pollution Control District 6. Waterworks District 7. Caltrans 8. Ventura County Environmental Health 9. Additional Planning Commission Condition 16 -1/-J..1 To C:,Jo DP-393 -396 / b DEVELOPMENT PLAN PERMIT NO.: APPLICANT: DATE: DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CONDITIONS GENERAL REQUIREMENTS: DP-393 -396 DP-393 -396 Siegel & Associates, Inc. February l, 1988 l. That permits are granted for the land and projects on the submitted plot plans and elevations. That the location and design of all site improvements shall be as shown on the approved plot plans and elevations. 2. That unless the projects are inaugurated (building foundation slab in place and substantial work in progress) not later than one ( l) year after these permits are granted, these permits shall automatically expire on that date. The Director of Community Development may, at his discretion, grant up to one (l) additional year extension from project inauguration if there have been no changes in the adjacent areas and if permittee can document that he has diligently worked toward inauguration or projects during the initial one-year period. 3. That any minor changes may be approved by the Director of Community Develop- ment upon the filing of a Minor Modification application, and the passing before the Planning Commission prior to the appeal period ending. Any Major Modifica- tion is to be approved by the City Council. 4. That the design, maintenance and operation of the permit areas and facilities thereon shall comply with all applicable requirements and enactments of Federal, State, and County and City authorities, and all such requirements and enactments shall, by reference, become conditions of these permits. 5. That no conditions of these entitlements shall be interpreted as perm1ttmg or requiring any violation of law or any unlawful rules or regulations or orders of an authorized governmental agency. In instances where more than one set of rules apply, the stricter ones shall take precedence. 6. That if any of the conditions or limitations of these development plans are held to be invalid, that holding shall not invalidate any of the remaining conditions or limitations set forth. 7. That the permittees agree as a condition of issuance and use of these permits to defend, at his sole expense, any action brought against the City because of issuance (or renewal) of these permits or in the alternative to relinquish these permits. Permittees will reimburse the City for any court cost which the City may be required by court to pay as a result of any such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate in the defense of any such action, but such participation shall not relieve permittees of his obligation under this condition. 17 DEVELOPMENT PLAN PERMIT NO.: APPLICANT: DATE: DP-393 -396 DP-393 -396 Siegel & Associates, Inc. February l, 1988 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CONDITIONS (Cont'd.) 8. That permittees' acceptance of these permits and/or operation under these permits shall be deemed to be acceptance by permittee of all conditions of these permits. 9. That the developments are subject to all applicable regulations of the (Limited Industrial) zone and all agencies of the State of California, County of Ventura, City of Moorpark, and any other governmental entities. PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A ZONING CLEARANCE, THE FOLLOWING CONDI- TIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED: 10. That the applicant will apply for a lot line adjustment prior to zone clearance to consolidate lots 24 and 25 into one lot. 11. That prior to construction for each project, a zone clearance shall be obtained from the Department of Community Development and a building permit shall be obtained for each project from the Building and Safety Division. 12. That prior to the issuance of a zone clearance, a landscaping and planting plan (3 sets), together with specifications and maintenance program, prepared by a State licensed landscape architect in accordance with County Guidelines for Landscape Plan Check, shall be submitted to the Director of Community Development for review aaE:i-a~~feva+. The applicant shall bear the total cost of such review and of final installation inspection. The landscaping and planting plan shall be accompanied by a fee specified by the City of Moorpark. All landscaping and planting shall be accomplished and approved by the Director of Community Development prior to the issuance of any occupancy permit for DP-393 -396. 13. That the final landscape plans for each project shall provide for a 50% shade coverage within all parking areas. Shade coverage is described as the maximum mid-day shaded area defined by a selected specimen tree at 50% maturity. Landscaping and irrigation shall be provided to the curb adjacent. 14. That all turf plantings associated with these projects shall be drought tolerant, low-water using variety. Plantings in and adjacent to parking in vehicular area shall be contained within raised planters surrounded by 6" high concrete curbs. 15. Landscaping shall not obscure any exterior door or window from street view. 16. Landscaping at entrances/exits or at any intersection within the parking lot shall not block or screen the view of a seated driver from another moving vehicle or pedestrian. 18 DEVELOPMENT PLAN PERMIT NO.: DP-393 -396 DP-393 -396 Siegel & Associates, Inc. APPLICANT: DATE: February l, 1988 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CONDITIONS (Cont'd.) 17. Landscaping (trees) shall not be placed directly under any overhead lighting which could cause a loss of light at ground level. 18. That all roof mounted equipment (vents, stacks, blowers, air conditioning equipment) that may extend above any parapet wall shall be enclosed on all four sides by view obscuring material. Prior to the issuance of a zone clearance, the final design of the roof screening and location of any roof mounted equipment of the projects must be approved by the Director of Community Development. 19. That all trash disposal areas shall be provided in a location which will not interfere with circulation, parking or access to the building and shall be screened with a six-(6) foot high, solid wall enclosure with metal gates, final design of said enclosure shall be subject to the approval of the Director of Community Develop- ment prior to the issuance of zone clearance. 20. That signs are subject to the Moorpark Code, Chapter 50, Title 9, Sign Ordinance. A sign permit is required. No building signs of any type shall be allowed on any building wall or window. Only a monument sign shall be permitted for these development plan and shall not exceed 30 square feet, no higher than 5 feet above average ground level. A sign program shall be submitted and approved by the Director of Community Development for all signage. 21. Roof design and construction for each project shall include a mm1mum 18" (inch) extension of the parapet wall above the highest point of the roof. 22. Prior to issuance of a zoning clearance, the final working drawings shall be submitted to the Director of Community Development for review aaEl.-appFevak 23. For all exterior lighting, a lighting plan shall be prepared by an electrical engineer registered in the State of California and submitted to the Department of Community Development for review aaEl.-appFeva! prior to the issuance of a zone clearance. The lighting plan shall achieve the following objectives: A void interference with reasonable use of adjoining properties; minimize to the greatest extent possible on-site glare; provide adequate on-site lighting; limit electroliers height to avoid excessive illumination; provide lighting structures which are compatible with the total design of the proposed facility. 19 DEVELOPMENT PLAN PERMIT NO.: DP-393 -396 DP-393 -396 Siegel & Associates, Inc. APPLICANT: DATE: February 1, 1988 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CONDITIONS (Cont'd.) These plans include the following: a. A photometric plan showing a point by point foot candle layout to extend a minimum twenty-(20) feet outside the property lines. Layout plan to be based on a ten-(10) foot grid center. .. b. Maximum overall height of pole fixtures shall be not more than fourteen (14) feet. Existing pole fixtures shall be reduced to fourteen (14) feet. c. Fixtures must have sharp cut-off qualities at property lines. d. There shall be no more than a seven to one (7:1) ratio of level of illumination shown. (Maximum to minimum ratio between Lighting Standards.) e. Low pressure energy efficient light fixtures shall be used. f. Average maximum of one-half candle illumination. 24. Pullover parking (overhangs) shall be limited to 24 inches maximum. 25. Prior to the issuance of a zone clearance for each project the developer shall show evidence of a recorded covenant to hold as a single parcel lots 24 and 25 of Ventura County Assessors Office Book 511, page 62. 26. That the applicant shall construct a utility room with common access to house all meters. No exterior ladders shall be permitted. 27. The applicant shall, prior to the issuance of a zone clearance for each project, execute a covenant running with the land on behalf of itself and its successors, heirs and assigns agreeing to participate in the formation of and be subject to any assessment district or other financing technique including but not limited to the payment of traffic mitigation fees, which the City may implement or adopt, to fund public street and traffic improvements directly or indirectly affected by the development. Traffic mitigation fees shall be used for projects such as, but not limited to, the extension of New Los Angeles A venue. 28. Tkat-tke -ftaal-aeStgR-ef-s-ite -im~f01/@meats-feF-eae.h-~Fe;teet,-iaelt1.Eliag -matettals aaa-eeleFs,-is-s li e:reet-te-tke-a~~Fe,.-al-ef-tke-Plaaaiag-t:emmissiea-:- 20 DEVELOPMENT PLAN PERMIT NO.: APPLICANT: DATE: DP-393 -396 DP-393 -396 Siegel & Associates, Inc. February 1, 1988 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CONDITIONS (Cont'd.) 29. That the applicant shall provide a five (5) foot wide meandering sidewalk along Los Angeles Area and shall provide landscaping and trees along Los Angeles A venue to the satisfaction of the Director of Community Development. 30. Prior to zone clearance the applicant shall have approval of the Director of Community Development to provide skylights that are as opaque as feasible to '' minimize potential evening illumination as viewed from the exterior. 31. That no asbestos pipe or construction materials shall be used for the projects entitlement without prior approval of the City Council. PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A BUILDING PERMIT, THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED: 32. That prior to the issuance of a building permit the developer shall pay all school assessment fees levied by the Moorpark Unified School District. 33. An "Unconditional Will Serve" letter for water and sewer service shall be obtained from Ventura County Waterworks District No. l or that the applicant shall have satisfied all requirements of the Ventura County Waterworks District No. l for annexation and will be provided with both water and sewer of provided temporary water service from Camrosa Water District to the satisfaction of the County Water Works District. 33A. Items required to be submitted in Condition Nos. 12, 22, and 23 shall be approved~ti_e__ uaf2V. DURING CONSTRUCTION, THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED: 34. That all utilities shall be underground to the nearest off-site utility pole except through transmission lines. 35. That all parking shall be surfaced with asphalt or concrete and shall include adequate provisions for drainage, striping and appropriate wheel blocks or curbs in parking areas. 36. That at the time water service connection is made for each project, cross connection control devices shall be installed on the water system in accordance with the requirements of the Ventura County Environmental Health Department. 21 DEVELOPMENT PLAN PERMIT NO.: APPLICANT: DATE: DP-393 -396 DP-393 -396 Siegel & Associates, Inc. February I, 1988 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CONDITIONS (Cont'd.) PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY, THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED: 37. That prior to the occupancy or change of occupancy or introduction of an additional occupancy of these buildings by the tenants, either the owner or prospective tenant shall apply for the use of these buildings. The purpose of the zoning clearance shall determine if the proposed u:,es are compatible with the existing zoning and terms and conditions of these permits. 38. That no later than ten (10) days after any change of property owner or of lessee(s) or operator(s) of the subject uses, there shall be filed with the Director of Community Development the name(s) and address(es) of the new owner(s) lessee(s) or operator(s), together with a letter from any such person(s), acknowledging and agreeing to comply with all conditions of these permits prior to zone clearance. 39. Prior to occupancy by any tenant or subsequent owner that would employ or dispose of hazardous waste or materials, a Major Modification shall be processed and filed. 40. All roof top mechanical equipment and other noise generation sources onsite be attenuated to 55 dBA at the property line. That prior to the issuance of the certificate of occupancy the applicant shall submit a report to demonstrate to the satisfaction of the Director of Community Development that all onsite noise generation sources have been mitigated to this level. The report shall be prepared by a licensed acoustical engineer in accordance with accepted engineering standards. AFTER ISSUANCE OF A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY, THE FOLLOWING CON- DITIONS SHALL BE APPLICABLE: 41. That the continued maintenance of the permit area and facilities shall be subject to periodic inspection by the City. The permittee shall be required to remedy any defects in ground maintenance, as indicated by Code Enforcement Officer within thirty (30) days after notification. 42. No outside storage of any materials or overnight simi-trucks or truck trailers, beyond the loading bays, of any kind shall be permitted after occupancy. 22 DEVELOPMENT PLAN PERMIT NO.: APPLICANT: DATE: DP-393 -396 DP-393 -396 Siegel & Associates, Inc. February l, 1988 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CONDITIONS (Cont'd.) 43. No repair or maintenance of trucks or any vehicle shall occur on the subject site. 44. Loading and unloading operations shall not be conducted between the hours of 10:00 p.m. and 6:00 a.m. 23 DEVELOPMENT PLAN PERMIT NO.: DP-393 -396 DP-393 -396 Siegel & Associates, Inc. APPLICANT: DATE: February I, I 988 CITY ENGINEER'S CONDITIONS PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A ZONING CLEARANCE, THE FOLLOWING CONDI- TIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED: 45. The applicant shall submit to the City of Moorpark for review aaa-af:'J9Feva+; a grading plan prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer; shall obtain a Grading Permit; and shall post sufficient surety guaranteeing completion. 46. The applicant shall submit to the City of Moorpark for review aaa-Bf:'J9Feva+; a detailed Soils Report certified by a registered professional Civil Engineer in the State of California. The grading plan shall incorporate the recommendation of the approved Soils Report. 4 7. The applicant shall submit to the City of Moorpark for review aBa-a1919Feva,I, street improvement plans prepared by Registered Civil Engineer; shall enter into an agreement with the City of Moorpark to complete the improvements; and shall post sufficient surety guaranteeing the construction of the improvements. The improvements shall include concrete curb and gutter, sidewalk, street lights, striping and signing, paving, and any necessary transitions in accordance with the Ventura County Road Standards. The applicable Road Standard Plates are as follows: a. A meandering sidewalk shall be constructed along Los Angeles A venue, with the plans approved by the Director of Community Development. b. Driveways to be constructed per Plate E-2 and to be 30 feet wide. 48. The applicant shall demonstrate for each building pad to the satisfaction of the City of Moorpark as follows: a. Adequate protection from 100-year frequency storm; and b. Feasible access during a 10-year frequency storm. Hydrology calculations shall be per current Ventura County Standards. 49. The applicant shall indicate in writing to the City of Moorpark, the disposition of any water well(s) and any other water that may exist within the site. If any wells are proposed to be abandoned, or if they are abandoned and have not been properly sealed, they must be destroyed per Ventura County Ordinance No. 2372. 24 DEVELOPMENT PLAN PERMIT NO.: DP-393 -396 DP-393 -396 Siegel & Associates, Inc. APPLICANT: DATE: February 1, 1988 CITY ENGINEER'S CONDITIONS (Cont'd.) 50. The applicant shall submit to the City of Moorpark for review aRa -a1:11:1feval, drainage plans, hydrologic, and hydraulic calculations prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer; shall enter into an agreement with the City of Moorpark to complete the improvement and shall post sufficient surety guaranteeing the construction of the improvements. The drainage plans and calculations shall indicate the following conditions before and after development. '' Quantities of water, water flow rates, major water courses, drainage areas and patterns, diversions, collection systems, flood hazard areas, sumps and drainage courses. Hydrology shall be per current Ventura County Standards except as follows: a. All sumps shall carry a 50-year frequency storm; b. All catch basins on continuous grade shall carry a IO-year storm; c. All catch basins in a sump condition shall be sized such that depth of water at intake shall equal depth of approach flows; d. All culverts shall carry a 1090-year frequency storm; e. Drainage facilities shall be provided such that surface flows are intercepted and contained prior to entering collector or secondary roadways; f. Under a IO-year frequency storm, all collector streets shall be provided with a minimum of one travel land with a goal that local, residential streets shall have one travel land available where possible. All stormwater flows shall be picked up at the existing catch basins located adjacent to the west property line. g. The applicant shall pay all energy costs associated with street lighting for a period of one year from the initial energizing of the street lights. h. The applicant shall have prepared a geotechnical investigation with regard to liquifaction. Per the City's safety element, this report shall be prepared by a Registered Professional Civil Engineer or Geologist. 25 DEVELOPMENT PLAN PERMIT NO.: DP-393 -396 DP-393 -396 Siegel & Associates, Inc. APPLICANT: DATE: February 1, 1988 CITY ENGINEER'S CONDITIONS (Cont'd.) 1. The applicant shall execute a covenant running with the land on behalf of itself and its successors, heirs, and assigns agreeing to participate in the formation of an assessment district or other financing technique including, but not limited to, the payment of traffic mitigation fees, which the City may implement or adopt, to fund public street and traffic improvements directly or indirectly affected by the development. J. The applicant shall offer to dedicate the City of Moorpark access easements over all private streets shown on the Tentative Map to provide access for all governmental agencies providing the public safety, health and welfare. k. That lot to lot drainage easements and secondary drainage easements shall be delineated on the grading plan. Assurance shall be provided to the City that these easements will be adequately maintained by property owners to safely convey storm water flows. PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A BUILDING PERMIT, THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED: 50A. Items required to be submitted in Condition Nos. 45, 46, 47, and 50 shall be approved. DURING CONSTRUCTION, THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL APPLY: 51. That prior to any work being conducted within the State or City right of way, the applicant shall obtain an Encroachment Permit from the appropriate Agency. 52. If any hazardous waste is encountered during the construction of this project, all work shall be immediately stopped and the Ventura County Environmental Health Department, the Fire Department, the Sheriff's Department, and the City Inspector shall be notified immediately. Work shall not proceed until clearance has been issued by all of these agencies. 53. If grading is to take place during the rainy season, an erosion control plan shall be submitted for review and approval along with the grading plan. Along with the erosion control measures hydroseeding of all graded slopes shall be required within 60 days of completion of grading. 26 DEVELOPMENT PLAN PERMIT NO.: APPLICANT: DATE: VENTURA COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS DP-393 -396 DP-393 -396 Siegel & Associates, Inc. February 1, 1988 DURING CONSTRUCTION, THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL APPLY: 54. A licensed security guard is required during the construction phase, or a 6-foot high chain fence shall be erected around the construction site. 55. Construction equipment, tools, etc., shall be properly. secured during non-working hours. 56. Lighting devices shall be high enough as to eliminate anyone on the ground from tampering with them. All parking areas shall be provided with a lighting system capable of illumination the parking surface with a minimum of 1-foot candle of light and shall be designed to minimize the spillage of light onto adjacent properties. All exterior lighting devices shall be protected by weather and breakage-resistant covers. 57. Landscaping at entrances/exits or at any intersection with the parking lot shall not block or screen the view of a seated driver from another moving vehicle or pedestrian. 58. Landscaping (trees) shall not be placed directly under any overhead lighting which could cause a loss of light at ground level. 59. All exterior doors shall be constructed of solid wood core a minimum of 1 and 3/4-inches thick or of metal construction. Front glass door(s) commonly used for entry are acceptable but should be visible to the street. 60. Doors utilizing a cylinder lock shall have a minimum five (5) pin tumbler operation with the locking bar or bolt extending into the receiving guide a minimum of I inch. PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED: 61. Address shall be clearly visible to approaching emergency vehicles and mounted against a contrasting color. 62. Address numbers shall be a minimum of 6 inches in height and illuminated during the hours of darkness. 63. There shall not be any easy exterior access to the roof area, i.e., ladders, trees, high walls, etc. 27 DEVELOPMENT PLAN PERMIT NO.: APPLICANT: DATE: DP-393 -396 DP-393 -396 Siegel & Associates, Inc. February 1, 1988 VENTURA COUNTY FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT CONDITIONS PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF ZONING CLEARANCE, THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED: 64. That building plans of public assembly areas, which have an occupant load of 50 or more, shall be submitted to the Ventura County Bureau of Fire Prevention for review. 65. That if any building(s) are to be protected by an automatic sprinkler system, plans shall be submitted, with payment for plan check, to the Ventura County Bureau of Fire Prevention for review. 66. That any structure greater than 5,000 square feet in area and/or 5 miles from a fire station shall be provided with an automatic fire sprinkler system in accordance with Ventura County Ordinance #14. DURING CONSTRUCTION, THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED: 67. That a width of 25 feet shall be provided for all streets and driveways. 68. That access roads shall be installed with an all weather surface, suitable for access by fire department apparatus. 69. That all drives shall have a minimum vertical clearance of 13 feet, 6 inches ( 13' 6"). 70. That the access roadway shall be extended to within l 50 feet of all portions of the exterior walls of the first story of any building. Where the access roadway cannot be provided, approved fire protection system or systems shall be installed as required and acceptable to the Bureau of Fire Prevention. 71. That prior to construction, the applicant shall submit plans to the Ventura County Bureau of Fire Prevention for approval of the location of fire hydrants. Show existing hydrants on plan within 300 feet of the development. 72. That fire hydrants shall be installed and in service prior to combustible construction and shall conform to the minimum standards of the County Water Works Manual. a. Each hydrant shall be a 6-inch wet barrel design and shall have one 4-inch and two 2 1/2-inch outlet(s). 28 DEVELOPMENT PLAN PERMIT NO.: DP-393 -396 Df-393 -396 Siegel & Associates, Inc. APPLICANT: DATE: February 1, 1988 VENTURA COUNTY FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT CONDITIONS (Cont'd.) b. The required fire flow shall be achieved at no less than 20 psi residual pressure. c. Fire hydrants shall be spaced 300 feet on center, and so located that no structure will be farther than 150 feet from any one hydrant. d. Fire hydrants shall be recessed in from curb face 24-inches at center. 73. That plans for the installation of an automatic fire extinguishing system (such as, halon or dry chemical) shall be submitted to the Ventura County Bureau of Fire Prevention for review to insure proper installation. PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A BUILDING PERMIT, THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED: 74. That the minimum fire flow required is determined by the type of building construction, proximity to other structures, fire walls, and fire protection devices provided, as specified by the I.S.O. Guide for Determining Required Fire Flow. Given the present plans and information, the required fire flow is approximately 2000 gallons per minute. The applicant shall verify that the water purveyor can provide the required quantity at the project. PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY, THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED: 75. That all grass or brush exposing any structures shall be cleared for a distance of 100 feet prior to framing, according to the Ventura County Weed Abatement Ordinance. 76. That address numbers, a minimum of 6 inches high, shall be installed prior to occupancy, shall be of contrasting color to the background; and shall be readily visible at night. Where structures are setback more than 250 feet from the street, larger numbers will be required so that they are distinguishable from the street, the address number(s) shall be posted adjacent to the driveway entrance. 77. That a plan shall be submitted to the Ventura County Bureau of Fire Prevention for review indicating the method in which buildings are to be identified by address numbers. 78. That fire extinguishers shall be installed in accordance with National Fire Protection Association, Pamphlet # I 0. The placement of extinguishers shall be reviewed by the Fire Prevention Bureau. 29 DEVELOPMENT PLAN PERMIT NO.: APPLICANT: DATE: DP-393 -396 DP-393 -396 Siegel & Associates, Inc. February I, 1988 VENTURA COUNTY AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT CONDITIONS PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A BUILDING PERMIT, THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED: 79. The District shall be notified at the time of original occupancy and each time there is a change in occupancy of tenants leasing space from the projects so the District may review activities and materials to be warehoused or manufactured. 30 DEVELOPMENT PLAN PERMIT NO.: APPLICANT: DATE: WATERWORKS DISTRICT CONDITIONS GENERAL REQUIREMENTS: DP-393 -396 DP-393 -396 Siegel & Associates, Inc. February 1, 1988 80. All future tenants shall comply with the District's Rules and Regulations including existing or subsequently adopted waste discharge ordinances, policies or procedures. PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A BUILDING PERMIT, THE· FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED: 81. That the District be allowed to review the adequacy and level of service for each project when tenant improvements are requested. Additional facilities, onsite treatment, or other modifications may be required as a condition of certain tenant improvements. 31 DEVELOPMENT PLAN PERMIT NO.: APPLICANT: DATE: CAL TRANS CONDITIONS DP-393 -396 DP-393 -396 Siegel & Associates, Inc. February 1, 1988 PRIOR TO ZONING CLEARANCE, THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED: 82. Prior to zone clearance, Developer shall make a supplementary contribution to the Los Angeles A venue Area of Contribution in the amount of $~~.QQQ $70,000, representing half of the estimated project costs to cqnstruct a traffic signal at the intersection of Maureen Lane at Los Angeles A venue. Whea-the-~½ty-Eag-iaeef aaa -~al-tFaRs -EieteFm-iae -that -tnff-ie -s-igaal-waFFaRts -aFe -sattSf-iea, -the -~-tty -wtH 1:3Feeeea-w½th-eeastf11et-iea -ef-the-s-igaa-1,-w½th-haEl-iag -ta-eeas-ist-ef-~Q%-Fegl:llaf AQ~-fl:laas-aaa-~Q%-E>evele1:3et=!s-Sl:l1:3~meataFy-AQ~-eeatF-ie11t-iea-:- Additional reasonable necessary traf fie studies as may be required by the City Engineer shall be provided by the applicant. 32 DEVELOPMENT PLAN PERMIT NO.: DP-393 -396 DP-393 -396 Siegel & Associates, Inc. APPLICANT: DATE: February 1, 1988 VENTURA COUNTY ENVIRONMENT AL HEAL TH DIVISION CONDITIONS PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A ZONING CLEARANCE, THE FOLLOWING CONDI- TIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED: 83. Prior to issuance of a zone clearance for the inauguration of any use in the proposed structures, such use shall be reviewed and approved by the Ventura County Environmental Health Division. PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY, THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED: 84. The applicant shall ensure that the volume of hazardous waste will be reduced or eliminated by undertaking the following: a. Alter processes to eliminate or reduce the amount of hazardous waste generated. b. Develop a waste exchange program. c. Recycle the waste. d. Construct or install on-site hazardous waste treatment facilities. 85. The applicant shall ensure that groundwater pollution and other environmental damage will be avoided by undertaking the following: a. Install and maintain proper containment. b. Comply with all hazardous waste generator laws for storage, handling, transportation and disposal. 33 DEVELOPMENT PLAN PERMIT NO.: APPLICANT: DATE: DP-393 -396 DP-393 -396 Siegel & Associates, Inc. February 1, 1988 ADDITIONAL PLANNING COMMISSION CONDITION (March 7, 1988) 86. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall pay a fee consistent with a schedule adopted by the City Council for Transportation Systems Management (TSM ). The Director of Community Development shall notify the City Council once a zoning clearance for DP-393 -396 has been approved (in the event a TSM schedule has not been adopted by that time). 34 B. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR LDM-10 1. Community Development 2. City Engineer 3. Ventura County Sheriff's Department 4. Ventura County Fire Protection 5. Waterworks District 6. Caltrans 7. Ventura County Environmental Health 17 LDM-10 DP-397 -404 LAND DIVISION NO: APPLICANT: DATE: DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CONDITIONS GENERAL REQUIREMENTS: LDM-10 DP-397 -404 LDM-10 Siegel & Associates, Inc. February l, 1988 l. That the conditions of approval of this Land Division map supersedes all conflicting notation, specifications, dimensions, typical sections and the like which may be shown on siad map and that all of the provisions of the Subdivision Map Act, City of Moorpark Subdivision Ordinance, and adopted County Policies apply . .. 2. That all requirements of any law or agency of the State, Ventura County, and City of Moorpark and any other governmental enmity shall be met, and all such requirements and enactment shall, by reference, become conditions of the entitlement. 3. That no condition of this entitlement shall be interpreted as perm1ttmg or requiring any violation of law, or any lawful rules or regulations or orders of an authorized governmental agency. In instances where more than one set of rules apply, the stricter ones shall take precedence. 4. That if any of the conditions or limitations of this entitlement are held to be invalid, that holding shall not invalidate any of the remaining conditions or limitations set forth. 5. That applicant agrees as a condition of issuance (or renewal) and use of this permit, to def end, at his sole expense, any action brought against the City because of issuance (or renewal) of this permit or, in the alternative, to relinquish this permit. Applicant will reimburse the City for any court costs and/or attorney's fees which the City may be required by a court to pay as a result of any such action the City may, at its sole discretion, participate in the defense of any such action, but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligation under this condition. 6. That applicant's recordation of this map shall be deemed to be acceptance by applicant of all conditions of this land division. PRIOR TO APPROVAL OF FINAL MAP, THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED: 7. As of the date of recordation of final (LDM) map, the lots depicted thereon shall meet the requirements of the zoning ordinance and General Plan then applicable to the property. Compliance with this condition shall be required even if the zoning and General Plan requirements in effect as of the date the tentative mp is 18 LDM-10 DP-397 -404 LAND DIVISION NO.: LDM-10 Siegel & Associates, Inc. APPLICANT: DATE: February I, 1988 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CONDITIONS (Cont'd.) 8. 9. conditionally approved. Conditional approval of the tentative map shall neither limit the power of the legislative body to amend the applicable zoning ordinances and/or general plan nor compel the legislative body to make any such amend- ments. Prior to approval of the final map, the developer shall obtain a "District Release" from the Camrosa Municipal Water District indicating' payment of District's Capital Construction charges. _1 ;.JJ ,rl/# )I ~~/ Prior to approval of the final map, an "U~ ~, e" letter for water and sewer service shall be obtained from Ventura County Waterworks District No. I or that the applicant shall have satisfied all requirements of the Ventura County Waterworks District No. 1. for annexatiee and will be pi:ovided with buth water and sewer of provided tempo1 at y water se1 vice from Camrosa Water District to the satisfaetien of the County Water Works DistcicL DURING CONSTRUCTION, THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SA TISIFIED: 10. That at the time water service connection is made, cross connection control devices shall be installed on the water system in accordance with the requirements of the Ventura County Division of Environmental Health. 19 LDM-10 DP-397 -404 LAND DIVISION NO.: LDM-10 Siegel & Associates, Inc. APPLICANT: DATE: February 1, 1988 CITY ENGINEER'S CONDITIONS PRIOR TO APPROVAL OF FINAL MAP, THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED: 11. The applicant shall submit to the City of Moorpark for review and approval, a grading plan prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer; shall obtain a Grading Permit; and shall post sufficient surety guaranteeing completion. 12. The applicant shall submit to the City of Moorpark for review and approval, a detailed Soils Report certified by a registered professional Civil Engineer in the State of California. The grading plan shall incorporate the recommendation of the approved Soils Report. 13. The applicant shall submit to the City of Moorpark for review and approval, street improvement plans prepared by Registered Civil Engineer; shall enter into an agreement with the City of Moorpark to complete the improvements; and shall post sufficient surety guaranteeing the construction of the improvements. The improvements shall include concrete curb and gutter. sidewalk. street lights. striping and signing, paving, and any necessary transitions in accordance with the Ventura County Road Standards. The applicable Road Standard Plates are as follows: a. "C" Street, "D" A venue, "A" Court, and "B" Court to be constructed per Plate B-3D modified to have 40 feet pavement width and 50 feet right-of-way width. b. Maureen Lane to be constructed per Plate B-3D. c. The north side of Los Angeles Avenue adjacent to the site to be constructed per Plate B-2A along property frontage. The applicant shall reimburse A.O.C. for A.O.C. -constructed improvements that would normally be required to be constructed. A meandering sidewalk shall be constructed along Los Angeles A venue, with the plans approved by the Director of Community Development. d. All cul-de-saces to be constructed per Plate C-3. e. All streets shall have a minimum of 4 inches of asphalt. f. Driveways to be constructed per Plate E-2 and to be 30 feet wide. 20 LDM-10 DP-397 -404 LAND DIVISION NO.: LDM-10 Siegel & Associates, Inc. APPLICANT: DATE: February I, 1988 CITY ENGINEER'S CONDITIONS (Cont'd.) 14. The applicant shall demonstrate for each building pad to the satisfaction of the City of Moorpark as follows: a. Adequate protection from 100-year frequency storm; and b. Feasible access during a IO-year frequency storm. Hydrology calculations shall be per current Ventura County Standards. l S. The applicant shall deposit with the City of Moorpark a contribution for the Los Angeles A venue Improvement Area of Contribution. The actual deposit shall be the then current Los Angeles A venue Improvement Area of Contribution applicable rate at the time the building permit is issued. 16. The applicant shall indicate in writing to the City of Moorpark, the disposition of any water well(s) and any other water that may exist within the site. If any wells are proposed to be abandoned, or if they are abandoned and have not been properly sealed, they must be destroyed per Ventura County Ordinance No. 2372. 17. The applicant shall submit to the City of Moorpark for review and approval, drainage plans, hydrologic, and hydraulic calculations prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer; shall enter into an agreement with the City of Moorpark to complete the improvement and shall post sufficient surety guaranteeing the construction of the improvements. The drainage plans and calculations shall indicate the following conditions before and after development. Quantities of water, water flow rates, major water courses, drainage areas and patterns, diversions, collection systems, flood hazard areas, sumps and drainage courses. Hydrology shall be per current Ventura County Standards except as follows: a. All sumps shall carry a SO-year frequency storm; b. All catch basins on continuous grade shall carry a IO-year storm; c. All catch basins in a sump condition shall be sized such that depth of water at intake shall equal depth of approach flows; d. All culverts shall carry a I 00-year frequency storm; 21 LDM-10 DP-397 -404 LAND DIVISION NO.: LDM-10 Siegel & Associates, Inc. APPLICANT: DATE: February 1, 1988 CITY ENGINEER'S CONDITIONS (Cont'd.) e. Drainage facilities shall be provided such that surface flows are intercepted and contained prior to entering collector or secondary roadways; f. Under a 10-year frequency storm, all collector streets shall be provided with a minimum of one travel lane with a goal that local, residential streets shall have one travel lane available where possible. If a travel lane cannot be maintained as described in f. above, the storm drain will be extended and/or additional catch basins provided to satisfy this condition. 18. For any Final Map, or a Parcel Map (containing five or more parcels), or any Parcel Map whereupon dedications are required to be offered, the applicant shall transmit by certified mail a copy of the conditionally approved Tentative Map together with a copy of Section 66436 of the State Subdivision Map Act to each public entity or public utility that is an easement holder of record. Written compliance shall be submitted to the City of Moorpark. 19. If any of the improvements which the applicant is required to construct or install is to be constructed or installed upon land in which the applicant does not have title or interest sufficient for such purposes, the applicant shall do all of the following at least 60 days prior to the filing of the final or parcel map for approval pursuant to Government Code Section 66457. a. Notify the City of Moorpark (hereafter "City") in writing that the applicant wishes the City to acquire an interest in the land which is sufficient for such purposes as provided in Government Code Section 66462.5; b. Supply the City with (i) a legal description of the interest to be acquired, (ii) a map or diagram of the interest to be acquired sufficient to satisfy the requirements of subdivision (e) of Section 1250.310 of the Code of Civil Procedure, (iii) a current appraisal report prepared by an appraiser approved by the City which expresses an op101on as to the current fair market value of the interest to be acquired, and (iv) a current Litigation Guarantee Report; c. Enter into an agreement with the City, guaranteed by such cash deposits or other security as the City may require, pursuant to which the applicant will pay all of the City's cost (including, without limitation, attorney's fees and overhead expenses) of acquiring such an interest in the land. 22 LDM-10 DP-397 -404 LAND DIVISION NO.: LDM-10 Siegel & Associates, Inc. APPLICANT: DATE: February I, 1988 CITY ENGINEER'S CONDITIONS (Cont'd.) 20. The applicant shall pay all energy costs associated with street lighting for a period of one year from the initial energizing of the street lights. The applicant shall execute a covenant running with the land on behalf of itself and its successors, heirs, and assigns agreeing to participate in the formation of an assessment district or other financing technique inchiciing, but not limited to, the payment of traffic mitigation fees, which the City may implement or adopt, to fund public street and traffic improvements directly or indirectly affected by the development. PRIOR TO RECORDATION, THE FOLLOWING CONDITION SHALL BE SATISFIED: 20A. Prior to recordation, Applicant shall reimburse the developer of LDM-8 (Annotti) for all direct construction expenses incurred in conjunction with construction of storm drain facilities along "D" Avenue within LDM-10. If necessary, the City Engineer will make the final determination of the reimbursable amount. IN CONJUNCTION WITH APPROVAL OF FINAL MAP, THE FOLLOWING CONDI- TIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED: 21. The applicant shall offer to dedicate on the Map to the City of Moorpark for public use, all the public streets right of way shown on the Map. 22. The applicant shall offer to dedicate on the Final (Parcel) Map to the City of Moorpark access easements over all private streets shown on the Final (Parcel) Map to provide access for all governmental agencies providing the public safety, health and welfare. 23. The applicant shall off er for dedication to the City of Moorpark a street easement of sufficient width along Los Angeles A venue to permit an ultimate ight of way of 59 feet, according to the applicable Ventura County Road Standard Plate B-2A, north of the centerline of Los Angeles Avenue along the entire frontage of the parent parcel. 24. The applicant shall dedicate on the Final (Parcel) Map to the City of Moorpark the access rights adjacent to Los Angeles A venue along the entire frontage of the parent parcel except for approved access road(s) as delineated on the approved Tentative Maps. 23 LAND DIVISION NO.: APPLICANT: DATE: CITY ENGINEER'S CONDITIONS (Cont'd.) LDM-10 DP-397 -404 LDM-10 Siegel & Associates, Inc. February I, 1988 25. That lot to lot drainage easements and secondary drainage easements shall be delineated on the final map. Assurance shall be provided to the City that these easements will be adequately maintained by property owners to safely convey storm water flows. DURING CONSTRUCTION, THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL APPLY: 26. That prior to any work being conducted within the State or City right of way, the applicant shall obtain an Encroachment Permit from the appropriate Agency. 27. If any hazardous waste is encountered during the construction of this project, all work shall be immediately stopped and the Ventura County Environmental Health Department, the Fire Department, the Sheriff's Department, and the City Inspector shall be notified immediately. Work shall not proceed until clearance has been issued by all of these agencies. 28. Where roads are to be built requring 4 or more inches of pavement, applicant shall construct the required street section minus I -inch of paving as an interim condition until all utility cuts or trenching is completed. The final I-inch cap of asphalt shall be placed after all necessary trenching is completed. 29. If grading is to take place during the rainy season, an erosion control plan shall be submitted for review and approval along with the grading plan. Along with the erosion control measures, hydroseeding of all graded slopes shall be required within 60 days of completion of grading. 30. Condition No. 30 has been renumbered to Condition No. 31.A.. 31. To assist the City Engineer in determining when a traffic signal should be installed at the intersection of Los Angeles A venue with Maureen Lane, the developer shall conduct manual turning counts from 6:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. prior to the issuance of zone clearance for Development Projects corresponding to 40%, 65%, and 90% of the developable portion of the parent parcel. If this information is provided by other sources (City, Caltrans, or other developments) to the City Engineer's satisfaction, part or all of this condition may be waived by the City Engineer. 24 LAND DIVISION NO.: APPLICANT: DATE: CITY ENGINEER'S CONDITIONS (Cont'd.) LDM-10 DP-397 -404 LDM-10 Siegel & Associates, Inc. February 1, 1988 PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY, THE FOLLOWING CONDITION SHALL APPLY: 31A. "C" Street and "D" Avenue are to be completely constructed prior to zone clearance of 25% of the total developable land area within LDM-10, or by July l, 1989, whichever occurs first. Regardless of the above time limits, "C" Street and "D" Avenue are to be completed prior to 2eRe-elea,aeee occupancy of any lot taking access to "D" A venue or "C" Street, or prior to completion of the Maureen Lane Signal. VENTURA COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPARTMENT DURING CONSTRUCTION, THE FOLLOWING CONDITION SHALL BE SATISFIED: 32. Construction equipment, tools, etc., shall be properly secured during non-working hours. 33. That a six-foot chain link fence shall be erected around the construction site and locked during evening hours and on week-ends when no construction activity is present. 25 LDM-10 DP-397 -404 LAND DIVISION NO.: LDM-10 Siegel & Associates, Inc. APPLICANT: DATE: February 1, 1988 VENTURA COUNTY FIRE PROTECTION PRIOR TO APPROVAL OF FINAL MAP, THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED: 34. That prior to approval of the final map, the applicant shall provide to the Fire Department verification from the water purveyor that the purveyor can provide the required fire flow for the project. PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A BUILDING PERMIT, THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED: 35. That if the subject parcel is within a Water Purveyor District, water mains capable of providing a fireflow of 4500 GPM at 20 psi shall be installed from the public right of way or from the purveyor point of connection to the street in front of each parcel. The cost of engineering, installation and maintenance of these mains shall be that of the applicant of this division (Parcel Map). This improvement or provisions to guarantee its installation shall be completed priro to recordation. Prior to combustible construction on any parcel, the water mains shall be extended to within 150 feet of the building site. A fire hydrant shall be installed at this location on the access road to the site and it shall be capable of providing the required fire flow. The owner of the combustible construction is responsible for the cost of this protection installation. DURING CONSTRUCTION, THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED: 36. That prior to combustible construction, all weather access road/driveway, suitable for use by a 20 ton fire department vehicle shall be installed. This improvement, or provisions to guarantee its installation shall be completed prior to recordation. 37. That the access road shall be of sufficient width to allow for a 40-foot turning radius at all sharp turns in the road. 38. That approved turn-around areas or easements for fire apparatus shall be provided where the access road is 150 feet or farther from the main thoroughfare. 39. That all drives shall have a minimum vertical clearance of 13 feet 6 inches (13' 6"). 40. That street name signs shall be installed in conjunction with the road improvement. The type of sign shall be in accordance with Plate F-4 of Ventura County Road Standards. 26 LAND DIVISION NO.: APPLICANT: DATE: VENTURA COUNTY FIRE PROTECTION (Cont'd.) LDM-10 DP-397 -404 LDM-10 Siegel & Associates, Inc. February I, 1988 41. That hydrants, when installed, shall be 6" x 4" x 4" x 2 1/2" level barrels. PRIOR TO OCC{JPANCY, THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED: 42. That the road shall be named if serving more than five (5) five parcels. The street name(s) shall be submitted to the Fire Department Communication Dispatcher Supervisor for review prior to recordation. 27 LAND DIVISION NO.: APPLICANT: DATE: WATERWORKS DISTRICT CONDITIONS GENERAL REQUIREMENTS: LDM-10 DP-397 -404 LDM-10 Siegel & Associates, Inc. February 1, 1988 43. All projects shall comply with the District's Rules and Regulations including existing or subsequently adopted waste discharge ordinances, policies or procedures. PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A BUILDING PERMIT, THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED: 44. That the District be allowed to review the adequacy and level of service for each project when tenant improvements are requested. Additional facilities, onsite treatment, or other modifications may be required as a condition of certain tenant improvements. 28 LAND DIVISION NO.: APPLICANT: DATE: CAL TRANS CONDITIONS LDM-10 DP-397 -404 LDM-10 Siegel & Associates, Inc. February 1, 1988 PRIOR TO ZONING CLEARANCE, THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED: 45. Prior to zone clearance, Developer shall make a supplementary contribution to the Los Angeles Avenue Area of Contribution in the amount of SeJ;GQQ $70,000, representing half of the estimated project costs to construct a traffic signal at the intersection of Maureen Lane at Los Angeles Avenue. Waea-tae-f;*y-Eagiaeef'-aaEi-f;aH,aas-Ele~•- 111tae-tkat-tfllffte-Stgaal-wa,,aats-a,e-sat-isf+ea;-tJ:te-f;*y-wtil-p,eeeea-w*k-eeast,aettea ef-tke-sigaal,-w*a-haa+ag-te-eeastst-ef-iQ%-,eg11la,-AQf;-f11aas-aaa-JQ%-Qevelepef!s 811p(Hell18Btafy-AQf;-eeRtfi81ltt8R-:- Additional reasonable necessary traf fie studies as. may be required by the City Engineer shall be provided by the applicant. 29 LDM-10 DP-397 -404 LAND DIVISION NO.: LDM-10 Siegel & Associates, Inc. APPLICANT: DATE: February 1, 1988 VENTURA COUNTY ENVIRONMENT AL HEAL TH DIVISION CONDITIONS PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A ZONING CLEARANCE, THE FOLLOWING CONDI- TIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED: 46. Prior to issuance of a zone clearance for the inauguration of any use in the proposed structures, such use shall be reviewed and approved by the Ventura County Environmental Health Division. PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY, THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED: 47. The applicant shall ensure that the volume of hazardous waste will be reduced or eliminated by undertaking the following: a. Alter processes to eliminate or reduce the amount of hazardous waste generated. b. Develop a waste exchange program. c. Recycle the waste. d. Construct or install on-site hazardous waste treatment facilities. 48. The applicant shall ensure that groundwater pollution and other environmental damage will be avoided by undertaking the following: a. Install and maintain proper containment. b. Comply with all hazardous waste generator laws for storage, handling, transportation and disposal. 30 C. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR DP-397 -404 1. Community Development 2. City Engineer 3. City Police 4. Ventura County Fire Protection 5. Ventura County Air Pollution Control District 6. Waterworks District 7. Caltrans 8. Ventura County Environmental Health 9. Additional Planning Commission Condition 31 LDM-10 DP-397 -404 DEVELOPMENT PLAN PERMIT: APPLICANT: DATE: DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CONDITIONS GENERAL REQUIREMENTS: LDM-10 DP-397 -404 DP-397 -404 Siegel & Associates, Inc. February l, 1988 I. That permits are granted for the land and projects on the submitted plot plans and elevations. That the location and design of all site improvements shall be as shown on the approved plot plans and elevations. 2. That unless the projects are inaugurated (building -foundation slab in place and substantial work in progress) not later than one (1) year after these permits are granted, these permits shall automatically expire on that date. The Director of Community Development may, at his discretion, grant up to one ( l) additional year extension from project inauguration if there have been no changes in the adjacent areas and if permittee can document that he has diligently worked toward inauguration or projects during the initial one-year period. 3. That any minor changes may be approved by the Director of Community Develop- ment upon the filing of a Minor Modification application, and the passing before the Planning Commission prior to the appeal period ending. Any Major Modifica- tion is to be approved by the City Council. 4. That the design, maintenance and operation of the permit areas and facilities thereon shall comply with all applicable requirements and enactments of Federal, State, and County and City authorities, and all such requirements and enactments shall, by reference, become conditions of these permits. 5. That no conditions of these entitlements shall be interpreted as permitting or requmng any violation of law or any unlawful rules or regulations or orders of an authorized governmental agency. In instances where more than one set of rules apply, the stricter ones shall take precedence. 6. That if any of the conditions or limitations of these development plans are held to be invalid, that holding shall not invalidate any of the remaining conditions or limitations set forth. 7. That the permittees agree as a condition of issuance and use of these permits to defend, at his sole expense, any action brought against the City because of issuance (or renewal) of these permits or in the alternative to relinquish these permits. Permittees will reimburse the City for any court cost which the City may be required by court to pay as a result of any such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate in the defense of any such action, but such participation shall not relieve permittees of his obligation under this condition. 32 DEVELOPMENT PLAN PERMIT: APPLICANT: DATE: LDM-10 DP-397 -404 DP-397 -404 Siegel & Associates, Inc. February 1, 1988 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CONDITIONS (Cont'd.) 8. That permittees' acceptance of these permits and/or operation under these permits shall be deemed to be acceptance by permittee of all conditions of these permits. 9. That the developments are subject to all applicable regulations of the (Limited Industrial) zone and all agencies of the State of California, County of Ventura, City of Moorpark, and any other governmental entitif?~· PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A ZONING CLEARANCE, THE FOLLOWING CONDI- TIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED: 10. That prior to construction for each project, a zone clearance shall be obtained from the Department of Community Development and a building permit shall be obtained for each project from the Building and Safety Division. 11. That prior to the issuance of a zone clearance, a landscaping and planting plan (3 sets), together with specifications and maintenance program, prepared by a State licensed landscape architect in accordance with County Guidelines for Landscape Plan Check, shall be submitted to the Director of Community Development for review aBEi-ap)='Pevak The applicant shall bear the total cost of such review and of final installation inspection. The landscaping and planting plan shall be accompanied by a fee specified by the City of Moorpark. All landscaping and planting shall be accomplished and approved by the Director of Community Development prior to the issuance of any occupancy permit for DP-397 -404. 12. That final landscape plans for each project shall provide for a 50% shade coverage within all parking areas. Shade coverage is described as the maximum mid-day shaded area defined by a selected specimen tree at 50% maturity. Landscaping and irrigation shall be provided to the curb adjacent. 13. That all turf plantings associated with these projects shall be drought tolerant, low-water using variety. Plantings in and adjacent to parking in vehicular area shall be contained within raised planters surrounded by 6" high concrete curbs. 14. Landscaping shall not obscure any exterior door or window from street view. I 5. Landscaping at entrances/exits or at any intersection within the parking lot shall not block or screen the view of a seated driver from another moving vehicle or pedestrian. 33 LDM-10 DP-397 -404 DEVELOPMENT PLAN PERMIT: DP-397 -404 Siegel & Associates, Inc. APPLICANT: DATE: February l, 1988 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CONDITIONS (Cont'd.) 16. Landscaping (trees) shall not be placed directly under any overhead lighting which could cause a loss of light at ground level. 17. That all roof mounted equipment (vents, stacks, blowers, air conditioning equipment) that may extend above any parapet wall shall be enclosed on all four sides by view obscuring material. Prior to the issu~nce of a zone clearance, the final design of the roof screening and location of any roof mounted equipment of the projects must be approved by the Director of Community Development. 18. That all trash disposal areas shall be provided in a location which will not interfere with circulation, parking or access to the building and shall be screened with a six-(6) foot high, solid wall enclosure with metal gates, final design of said enclosure shall be subject to the approval of the Director of Community Develop- ment prior to the issuance of zone clearance. 19. That signs are subject to the Moorpark Code, Chapter SO, Title 9, Sign Ordinance. A sign permit is required. No building signs of any type shall be allowed on any building wall or window. Only a monument sign shall be permitted for these development plans and shall not exceed 30 square feet, no higher than S feet above average ground level. A sign program shall be submitted and approved by the Director of Community Development for all signage. 20. Roof design and construction for each project shall include a m101mum 18-inch extension of the parapet wall above the highest point of the roof. 21. Prior to issuance of a zoning clearance, the final working drawings shall be submitted to the Director of Community Development for review anEl-&f:'f:'F8va-b- 22. For all exterior lighting, a lighting plan shall be prepared by an electrical engineer registered in the State of California and submitted to the Department of Community Development for review anEl-&f:'f:'F8VIH prior to the issuance of a zone clearance. The lighting plan shall achieve the following objectives: A void interference with reasonable use of adjoining properties; minimize to the greatest extent possible on-site glare; provide adequate on-site lighting; limit electroliers height to avoid excessive illumination; provide lighting structures which are compatible with the total design of the proposed facility. 34 LDM-10 DP-397 -404 DEVELOPMENT PLAN PERMIT: DP-397 -404 Siegel & Associates, Inc. APPLICANT: DATE: February I, 1988 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CONDITIONS (Cont'd.) These plans include the following: a. A photometric plan showing a point by point foot candle minimum twenty-(20) feet outside the property lines. based on a ten-(10) foot grid center. layout to extend a Layout plan to be b. Maximum overall height of pole fixtures shall be not more than twenty (20) feet. c. Fixtures must have sharp cut-off qualities at property lines. d. There shall be no more than a seven to one (7: 1) ratio of level of illumination shown. (Maximum to minimum ratio between Lighting Standards.) e. Low pressure energy efficient light fixtures shall be used. f. Average maximum of one foot candle illumination. 23. Pullover parking (overhangs) shall be limited to 24 inches maximum. 24. That the applicant shall construct a utility room(s) with common access to house all meters. No exterior ladders shall be permitted. 25. The applicant shall, prior to the issuance of a zone clearance for each project, execute a covenant running with the land on behalf of itself and its successors, heirs and assigns agreeing to participate in the formation of and be subject to any assessment district or other financing technique including but not limited to the payment of traffic mitigation fees, which the City may implement or adopt, to fund public street and traffic improvements directly or indirectly affected by the development. Traffic mitigation fees shall be used for projects such as, but not limited to, the extension of New Los Angeles A venue. 26. That-fhe -HBa+-EleStgB -ef -St-te -im1:1Fevemeae -fef -eaelt -1:1•e:ieef;-iBe·h1Eliag -mate Hals aaEl-eelef;-tS-sve:ieet-*8-flle-app,eva!-ef-the-PJaaaiag-f:emmt55½8B-:- 27. That no asbestos pipe or construction materials shall be used for the projects entitlement without prior approval of the City Council. 28. Prior to zone clearance, the applicant shall have approval by the Director of Community Development to provide skylights that are as opaque as feasible to minimize potential evening illumination as viewed from the exterior. 35 DEVELOPMENT PLAN PERMIT: APPLICANT: DATE: LDM-10 DP-397 -404 DP-397 -404 Siegel & Associates, Inc. February I, 1988 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CONDITIONS (Cont'd.) PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A BUILDING PERMIT, THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED: 29. That prior to the issuance of a building permit for each project the developer shall pay all school assessment fees levied by the Moorpark Unified School District. DURING CONSTRUCTION, THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED: 30. That all utilities shall be underground to the nearest off-site utility pole except through transmission lines. 31. That all parking shall be surfaced with asphalt or concrete and shall include adequate provisions for drainage, striping and appropriate wheel blocks or curbs in parking areas. 32. That at the time water service connection is made for each project, cross connection control devices shall be installed on the water system in accordance with the requirements of the Ventura County Environmental Health Department. PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY, THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED: 33. That prior to the occupancy or change of occupancy or introduction of an additional occupancy of these buildings by the tenants, either the owner or prospective tenant shall apply for the use of these buildings. The purpose of the zoning clearance shall determine if the proposed uses are compatible with the existing zoning and terms and conditions of these permits. 34. That no later than ten (10) days after any change of property owner or of lessee(s) or operator(s) of the subject uses, there shall be filed with the Director of Community Development the names(s) and address(es) of the new owner(s) lessee(s) or operator(s), together with a letter from any such person(s), acknowledging and agreeing to comply with all conditions of these permits prior to zone clearance. 35. Prior to occupancy by any tenant or subsequent owner that would employ or dispose of hazardous waste or materials, a Major Modification shall be processed and filed. 36 DEVELOPMENT PLAN PERMIT: APPLICANT: DATE: LDM-10 DP-397 -404 DP-397 -404 Siegel & Associates, Inc. February 1, 1988 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CONDITIONS (Cont'd.) 36. All roof top mechanical equipment and other noise generation sources onsite be attenuated to 55 dBA at the property line. That prior to the issuance of the certificate of occupancy the applicant shall submit a report to demonstrate to the satisfaction of the Director of Community Development that all onsite noise generation sources have been mitigated to this level. The report shall be prepared by a licensed acoustical engineer in accordance with accepted engineering standards. PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A BUILDING PERMIT, THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED: 36A. Items submitted for review in Condition Nos. I I, 21, and 22 shall be approved. AFTER ISSUANCE OF A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY, THE FOLLOWING CON- DITIONS SHALL BE APPLICABLE: 37. That the continued maintenance of the permit area and facilities shall be subject to periodic inspection by the City. The permittee shall be required to remedy any defects in ground maintenance, as indicated by the Code Enforcement Officer within thirty (30) days after notification. 38. No outside storage of any materials or overnight semi-trucks or truck trailers, beyond the loading bays, of any kind shall be permitted after occupancy. 39. No repair or maintenance of trucks or any vehicle shall occur on the subject sites. 40. Loading and unloading operations shall filU be conducted between the hours of 10:00 p.m. and 6:00 a.m. 37 LDM-10 DP-397 -404 DEVELOPMENT PLAN PERMIT: DP-397 -404 Siegel & Associates, Inc. APPLICANT: DATE: February 1, 1988 CITY ENGINEER'S CONDITIONS PRIOR TO ZONING CLEARANCE, THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED: 41. The applicant shall submit to the City of Moorpark for review aaa-app,eva-1, a grading plan prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer; shall obtain a Grading Permit; and shall post sufficient surety guaranteeing ~pmpletion. 42. The applicant shall submit to the City of Moorpark for review aaa-app,eva-1, a detailed Soils Report certified by a registered professional Civil Engineer in the State of California. The grading plan shall incorporate the recommendations of the approved Soils Report. 43. The applicant shall submit to the City of Moorpark for review aaa-app,eva-1, street improvement plans prepared by Registered Civil Engineer; shall enter into an agreement with the City of Moorpark to complete the improvements; and shall post sufficient surety guaranteeing the construction of the improvements. The improvements shall include concrete curb and gutter, sidewalk, street lights, striping and signing, paving, and any necessary transitions in accordance with the Ventura County Road Standards. The applicable Road Standard Plates are as follows: a. "C" Street, "D" A venue, "A" Court, and "B" Court to be constructed per Plate B-3D modified to have 40 feet pavement width and 50 feet right-of-way width. b. Maureen Lane to be constructed per Plate B-3D. c. All cul-de-saces to be constructed per Plate C-3. d. All streets shall have a minimum of 4 inches of asphalt. e. Driveways to be constructed per Plate E-2 and to be 30 feet wide. 44. The applicant shall demonstrate for each building pad to the satisfaction of the City of Moorpark as follows: a. Adequate protection from 100-year frequency storm; and b. Feasible access during a 10-year frequency storm. 38 LDM-10 DP-397 -404 DEVELOPMENT PLAN PERMIT: DP-397 -404 Siegel & Associates, Inc. APPLICANT: DATE: February 1, 1988 CITY ENGINEER'S CONDITIONS (Cont'd.) Hydrology calculations shall be per current Ventura County Standards. 45. The applicant shall deposit with the City of Moorpark a contribution for the Los Angeles A venue Improvement Area of Contribution. The actual deposit shall be the then current Los 1ngeles A venue Improvement Area of Contribution applicable rate at the time the building permit is issued. 46. The applicant shall indicate in writing to the City of Moorpark, the disposition of any water well(s) and any other water that may exist within the site. If any wells are proposed to be abandoned, or if they are abandoned and have not been properly sealed, they must be destroyed per Ventura County Ordinance No. 2372. 4 7. The applicant shall submit to the City of Moorpark for review aaEI-al:)pfeval, drainage plans, hydrologic, and hydraulic calculations prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer; shall enter into an agreement with the City of Moorpark to complete the improvement and shall post sufficient surety guaranteeing the construction of the improvements. The drainage plans and calculations shall indicate tr· following conditions before and after development. Quantities of water, water flow rates, major water courses, drainage areas and patterns, diversions, collection systems, flood hazard areas, sumps and drainage courses. Hydrology shall be per current Ventura County Standards except as follows: a. All sumps shall carry a 50-year frequency storm; b. All catch basins on continuous grade shall carry a IO-year storm; c. All catch basins in a sump condition shall be sized such that depth of water at intake shall equal depth of approach flows; d. All culverts shall carry a 100-year frequency storm; e. Drainage facilities shall be provided such that surface flows are intercepted and contained prior to entering collector or secondary roadways; f. Under a IO-year frequency storm, all collector streets shall be provided with a minimum of one travel lane with a goal that local, residential streets shall have one travel lane available where possible. 39 DEVELOPMENT PLAN PERMIT: APPLICANT: DATE: CITY ENGINEER'S CONDITIONS (Cont'd.) LDM-10 DP-397 -404 DP-397 -404 Siegel & Associates, Inc. February 1, 1988 If a travel lane cannot be maintained as described in f. above, the storm drain will be extended and/or additional catch basins provided to satisfy this condition. 48. The applicant shall pay all energy costs associated with street lighting for a period of one year from the initial energizing of the street lights. 49. The applicant shall have prepared a geotechnical investigation with regard to liquifaction. • Per the City's Safety Element, this report shall be prepared by a Registered Professional Civil Engineer or Geologist. 50. The applicant shall execute a covenant running with the land on behalf of itself and its successors, heirs, and assigns agreeing to participate in the formation of an assessment district or other financing technique including, but not limited to, the payment of traffic mitigation fees, which the City may implement or adopt, to fund public street and traffic improvements directly or indirectly affected by the development. AFTER ZONE CLEARANCE THE FOLLOWING CONDITION SHALL APPLY: 50A. If within 8 months following zone clearance of the first DP within LDM-10 the Applicant has not completed construction of "D" Avenue and the developer of LDM-8 then constructs the improvements, the applicant shall reimburse the developer of LDM-8 for all direct construction expenses. Reimbursement shall be made prior to the time that the applicant would otherwise be required to complete the improvements pursuant to these conditions. If necessary, the City Engineer will make the final determination of the reimbursement amount. PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A BUILDING PERMIT, THE FOLLOWING CONDITION SHALL BE SATISFIED: 50B. Items required for submittal in Condition Nos. 41, 42, 43, and 47 shall be approved. DURING CONSTRUCTION, THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL APPLY: 51. That prior to any work being conducted within the State or City right of way, the applicant shall obtain an Encroachment Permit from the appropriate Agency. 40 DEVELOPMENT PLAN PERMIT: APPLICANT: DATE: CITY ENGINEER'S CONDITIONS (Cont'd.) LDM-10 DP-397 -404 DP-397 -404 Siegel & Associates, Inc. February 1, 1988 52. If any hazardous waste is encountered during the construction of this project, all work shall be immediately stopped and the Ventura County Environmental Health Department, the Fire Department, the Sheriff's Department, and the City Inspector shall be notified immediately. Work shall not proceed until clearance has been issued by all of these agencies. 53. Where roads are to be built requiring 4 or more inches of pavement, applicant shall construct the required street section minus I-inch of paving as an interim condition until all utility cuts or trenching is completed. The final I-inch cap of asphalt shall be placed after all necessary trenching is completed. 54. If grading is to take place during the rainy season, an erosion control plan shall be submitted for review and approval along with the grading plan. Along with the erosion control measures, hydroseeding o( all graded slopes shall be required within 60 days of completion of grading. 55. Condition No. 55 has been renumbered to Condition No. 56A. 56. To assist the City Engineer in determining when a traffic signal should be installed at the intersection of Los Angeles A venue with Maureen Lane, the developer shall conduct manual turning counts from 6:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. prior to the issuance of zone clearance for Development Projects corresponding to 40%, 65%, and 90% of the developable portion of LDM-10. If this information is provided by other sources (City, Caltrans, or other developments) to the City Engineer's satisfaction, part or all of this condition may be waived by the City Engineer. PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY, THE FOLLOWING CONDITION SHALL BE SATISFIED: 56A. "C" Street and "D" A venue are to be completely constructed le) to zone clearance of 25% of the total developable land area within LDM-10, or by July 1, 1989, whichever occurs first. Regardless of the above time limits, "C" Street and "D" Avenue are to be completed prior to zeatag-e+eafa&ee occupancy of any lot taking access to "D" A venue or "C" Street, or prior to completion of the Maureen Lane Signal. 41 DEVELOPMENT PLAN PERMIT: APPLICANT: DATE: CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS LDM-10 DP-397 -404 DP-397 -404 Siegel & Associates, Inc. February l, 1988 DURING CONSTRUCTION, THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL APPLY: 57. A 6-foot high chain fence shall be erected around the construction site. 58. Construction equipment, tools, etc., shall be properly secured during non-working hours. 59. Lighting devices shall be high enough as to eliminate anyone on the ground from tampering with them. All parking areas shall be provided with a lighting system capable of illuminating the parking surface with a minimum of I-foot candle of light and shall be designed to minimize the spillage of light onto adjacent properties. All exterior lighting devices shall be protected by weather and breakage-resistant covers. 60. Landscaping at entrances/exits or at any intersection with the parking lot shall not block or screen the view of a seated driver from another moving vehicle or pedestrian. 61. Landscaping (trees) shall not be placed directly under any overhead lighting which could cause a loss of light at ground level. 62. All exterior doors shall be constructed of solid wood core a minimum of l and 3/4-inches thick or of metal construction. Front glass door(s) commonly used for entry are acceptable but should be visible to the street. 63. Doors utilizing a cylinder lock shall have a mm1mum five (5) pin tumbler operation with the locking bar or bolt extending into the receiving guide a minimum of 1 inch. PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED: 64. Address shall be clearly visible to approaching emergency vehicles and mounted against a contrasting color. 65. Address numbers shall be a minimum of 6 inches in height and illuminated during the hours of darkness. 66. There shall not be any easy exterior access to the roof area, i.e., ladders, trees, high walls, etc. 42 DEVELOPMENT PLAN PERMIT: APPLICANT: DATE: LDM-10 DP-397 -404 DP-397 -404 Siegel & Associates, Inc. February I, 1988 VENTURA COUNTY FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT CONDITIONS PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF ZONING CLEARANCE, THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED: 67. That building plans of public assembly areas, which have an occupant load of 50 or more, shall be submitted to the Ventura County Bureau of Fire Prevention for review. 68. That if any building(s) are to be protected by an automatic sprinkler system, plans shall be submitted, with payment for plan check, to the Ventura County Bureau of Fire Prevention for review. 69. That any structure greater than 5,000 square feet in area and/or 5 miles from a fire station shall be provided with an automatic fire sprinkler system in accordance with Ventura County Ordinance #14. DURING CONSTRUCTION, THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: 70. That a width of 25 feet shall be provided for all streets and driveways. 71. That access roads shall be installed with an all weather surface, suitable for access by fire department apparatus. 72. That all drives shall have a minimum vertical clearance of 13 feet, 6 inches ( 13' 6"). 73. That approved turn around areas for fire apparatus shall be provided where the access road is 150 feet or farther from the main thoroughfare. A turn around is needed for the Community Drive. 74. That prior to construction, the applicant shall submit plans to the Ventura County Bureau of Fire Prevention for approval of the location of fire hydrants. Show existing hydrants on plan within 300 feet of the development. 75. That fire hydrants shall be installed and in service prior to combustible construction and shall conform to the minimum standards of the County Water Works Manual. a. Each hydrant shall be a 6-inch wet barrel design and shall have one 4-inch and two 2 1/2-inch outlet(s). 43 LDM-10 DP-397 -404 DEVELOPMENT PLAN PERMIT: DP-397 -404 Siegel & Associates, Inc. APPLICANT: DATE: February 1, 1988 VENTURA COUNTY FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT CONDITIONS (Cont'd.) b. The required fire flow shall be achieved at no less than 20 psi residual pressure. c. Fire hydrants shall be spaced 300 feet on center, and so located that no structure will be farther than 150 feet from any one hydrant. d. Fire hydrants shall be recessed in from curb face 24-inches at center. 76. That plans for the installation of an automatic fire extinguishing system (such as, halon or dry chemical) shall be submitted to the Ventura County Bureau of Fire Prevention for review to insure proper installation. PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A BUILDING PERMIT, THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED: 77. That the minimum fire flow required is determined by the type of building construction, proximity to other structures, fire walls, and fire protection devices provided, as specified by the I.S.O. Guide for Determining Required Fire Flow. Given the present plans and information, the required fire flow is approximately 2000 gallons per minute. The applicant shall verify that the water purveyor can provide the required quantity at the project. PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY, THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED: 78. That all grass or brush exposing any structures shall be cleared for a distance of 100 feet prior to framing, according to the Ventura County Weed Abatement Ordinance. 79. That address numbers, a minimum of 6 inches high, shall be installed prior to occupancy, shall be of contrasting color to the background; and shall be readily visible at night. Where structures are setback more than 250 feet from the street, larger numbers will be required so that they are distinguishable from the street, the address number(s) shall be posted adjacent to the driveway entrance. 80. That a plan shall be submitted to the Ventura County Bureau of Fire Prevention for review indicating the method in which buildings are to be identified by address numbers. 81. That fire extinguishers shall be installed in accordance with National Fire Protection Association, Pamphlet # 10. The placement of extinguishers shall be reviewed by the Fire Prevention Bureau. 44 DEVELOPMENT PLAN PERMIT: APPLICANT: DATE: LDM-10 DP-397 -404 DP-397 -404 Siegel & Associates, Inc. February 1, 1988 VENTURA COUNTY FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT CONDITIONS (Cont'd.) 82. That prior to recordation of street names, names shall be submitted to the Bureau of Fire Prevention for review. 83. That street signs shall be installed prior to occupancy. 45 DEVELOPMENT PLAN PERMIT: APPLICANT: DATE: LDM-10 DP-397 -404 DP-397 -404 Siegel & Associates, Inc. February 1, I 988 VENTURA COUNTY AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT CONDITIONS PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A BUILDING PERMIT, THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED: 84. The District shall be notified at the time of original occupancy and each time there is a new tenant leasing space from the projects so the District may review activities and materials to be warehoused or manufactured . .. 46 DEVELOPMENT PLAN PERMIT NO.: APPLICANT: DATE: WATERWORKS DISTRICT CONDITIONS GENERAL REQUIREMENTS: LDM-10 DP-397 -404 DP-397 -404 Siegel & Associates, Inc. February I, 1988 85. All future tenants shall comply with the District's Rules and Regulations including existing or subsequently adopted waste discharge ordinances, policies or procedures. PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A BUILDING PERMIT, TH];:, FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED: 86. That the District be allowed to review the adequacy and level of service for each project when tenant improvements are requested. Additional facilities, onsite treatment, or other modifications may be required as a condition of certain tenant improvements. 47 DEVELOPMENT PLAN PERMIT: APPLICANT: DATE: CAL TRANS CONDITIONS LDM-10 DP-397 -404 DP-397 -404 Siegel & Associates, Inc. February 1, 1988 PRIOR TO ZONING CLEARANCE, THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED: 87. Prior to zone clearance, Developer shall make a supplementary contribution to the Los Angeles Avenue Area of Contribution in the amount of $6S,QQQ $70,000, representing half of the estimated project costs to construct a traffic signal at the intersection of Maureen Lane at Los Angeles Avenue. Whea-the-t¼¼y-Eag-iaeef aREl -taHfaRs -Eletefm-tRe -that -Haff-ie -S-tgaal -waffaRfS -ue -saf½Sf-teEI, -the -t-ify -wtH ~feeeeEI-w-ifh-eeRSff1:1et-teB-ef-the-S-tgaa+;-w-ifh-faaEl-iag-te-eeBS-tSt-ef-SQ%-f@glilaf AQ<;:-faaEls-aaEl-SQ%-:9eYele~ef!s-Sli~J:Memeatafy-AG>t-eeBtf-tBlitieB.,- Additional reasonable necessary traf fie studies as may be required by the City Engineer shall be provided by the applicant. 48 LDM-10 DP-397 -404 DEVELOPMENT PLAN PERMIT: DP-397 -404 Siegel & Associates, Inc. APPLICANT: DATE: February I, 1988 VENTURA COUNTY ENVIRONMENT AL HEAL TH DIVISION CONDITIONS PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A ZONING CLEARANCE, THE FOLLOWING CONDI- TIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED: 88. Prior to issuance of a zone clearance for the inauguration of any use in the proposed structures, such use shall be reviewed and approved by the Ventura County Environmental Health Division. PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY, THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED: 89. The applicant shall ensure that the volume of hazardous waste will be reduced or eliminated by undertaking the following: a. Alter processes to eliminate or reduce the amount of hazardous waste generated. b. Develop a waste exchange program. c. Recycle the waste. d. Construct or install on-site hazardous waste treatment facilities. 90. The applicant shall ensure that groundwater pollution and other environmental damage will be avoided by undertaking the following: a. Install and maintain proper containment. b. Comply with all hazardous waste generator laws for storage, handling, transportation and disposal. 49 DEVELOPMENT PLAN PERMIT: APPLICANT: DATE: LDM-10 DP-397 -404 DP-397 -404 Siegel & Associates, Inc. February I, 1988 ADDITIONAL PLANNING COMMISSION CONDITION (March 7, 1988) 91. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall pay a fee consistent with a schedule adopted by the City Council for Transportation Systems Management (TSM). The Director of Community Development shall notify the City Council once a zoning clearance for DP-397 -404 has been approved ( in the event a TSM schedule has not been adopted by that time). 50