HomeMy WebLinkAboutAGENDA REPORT 1988 0907 CC REG ITEM 09AJOHN PATRICK LANE
Mayor
ELOISE BROWN
Mayor Pro Tern
JOHN GALLOWAY
Council member
CLINT HARPER, Ph.D.
Council member
BERNARDOM. PEREZ
Council member
MAUREEN W. WALL
City Clerk
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
MOORPARK
MEMORANDUM
ITEM 28,
STEVEN KUENY
City Manager
CHERYLJ. KANE
City Attorney
PATRICK RICHARDS, A.I.C.P.
Director of
Community Development
R. DENNIS DELZEIT
City Engineer
JOHN V. GILLESPIE
Chief of Police
The Honorable City Council
Patrick J. Richards, Director of C....unity Developmen~
September 1, 1988 (CC meeting of 9/7/88)
APPEAL NO. AP-88-1O -LE CLUB APARTKENTS -SIGN VIOLATION
Background
Two signs and three model sales flags are the subject of this
appeal. The signs include one off-site directional sign and one
on-site sign advertising apartment units available (for rent). The
property pertaining to these signs and flags is located at the
southeast corner of Los Angeles Avenue and Moorpark Avenue (LeClub
Apartments). No provisions exist in the municipal code (Ord. 82
and Ord. 90) for signs and flags for rental unit projects.
Therefore, any tolerance of signs by the City has been as a
courtesy to the LeClub apartments. Sizes of signs and flags and
permitted duration of these items have now exceeded even those that
are permitted for a model home tract complex in which units are for
sale. Provisions do exist for signs and flags in ordinances 82 and
90 for units for that are sale only. The on-site sign measures
12'x 8 1 (96 sq.ft.) and is double-sided (total of 192 sq.ft.) 60
sq.ft. is the maximum permitted for tract sales. The off-site sign
is also 12 'x 8' and has an additional 2 'x 12' sign ( total of 120
sq. ft.) 32 sq. ft. is the limit for tract sales and is also double
sided. The grand total of off-site signage is 240 sq.ft.
Ordinance No. 82 limits the time periods in which both on and off
site signs may be posted; the period is either two years or until
the last unit is first sold, whichever occurs first. The last unit
rented has long since occurred. Therefore, the Director of
Community Development has determined that the signs should have
been removed following the rental of the last unit.
882508/CHRONI PJR:MAR:JS:crl
799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark, California 93021 (805) 529-6864
September 1, 1988
Page 2
Pursuant to Ordinance No. 90 the flags were permitted for tract
sales to remain for one year or until the last unit is first sold;
both of these two events have now occurred. The flags can be
maintained for up to one additional year if a renewal had been
requested and granted. A renewal was not requested. (Again this
applies only to units for sale).
This item was previously scheduled for the Commission's meeting of
July 5, 1988 and at the request of the applicant the item was
continued to the Commission meeting of July 18, 1988.
At the time of continuance staff identified new information
received just prior to the meeting date relating to an off-site
LeClub sign. On the afternoon of July 5, 1988 it was brought to
our attention that a second off-site billboard advertising LeClub
apartments was seen. This sign is located on Tierra Rejada Road
just east of the 23 freeway in the unincorporated area. The sign
is 8 1 x 4 1 and is similar in appearance to the LeClub billboard on
Los Angeles Avenue and Spring Road.
This i tern did appear before the Planning Commission on July 18,
1988. Attorney Larry H. Miller representing the LeClub Apartment
Property Management in support referenced California Civil Code
Section 713 which relates to "Conditions of Ownership" -Local
regulations; signs advertising property for sale lease or exchange;
as is defined as follows:
"Notwithstanding any provision of any ordinance, an owner
of real property or his agent may display or have
displayed on the owner I s property a sign of reasonable
dimensions, as determined by the city or county,
advertising:
(a) That the property is for sale, lease, or
exchange by the owner or his agent;
(b) The owner's or agent's name; and
(c) The owner's or agent's address and telephone
number.11
The City Attorney's office has informed staff that this section is
applicable and that some reasonable allowance of sign space for
this purpose cited in Civil Code Section 713 must be made with
regard to the on-site sign. With respect to the off-site sign, if
it is intended to serve the same purpose as a subdivision
directional sign, it must be afforded the same opportunity as
such. It would be allowed for two (2) years or until the last unit
is first rented.
No permission currently exists to allow the flags to remain.
882508/CHRONI PJR:MAR:JS:crl
September 1, 1988
Page 3
The Commission's discussion concerned residentially zoned property
in relation to residential uses and determined that the off-site
signage was not permitted. With a 5:0 vote the Commission moved to
uphold the Director's decision that the permitted time periods for
the on and off-site signs and flags have been exceeded and directed
the property owner to remove such signs permanently.
Recommendation
1. Uphold the Planning Commission's decision based on residentially
zoned property in relation to residential uses;
2. Require removal of the existing on-site sign and or
modification to conform to Section 713 of the California Civil
Code, but not to include off-site signage. Size and location
to be determined and approved by the Director of Community
Development; or
3. Require removal of the off-site sign and flags since it is past
the time the last unit was first rented and since the sign
exceeds the 32 sq. ft. size limit for a subdivision off-site
direction sign.
Attachments: 1.
2.
882508/CHRONI PJR:MAR:JS:crl
California Civil Code Section 713
Planning Commission Staff Report dated July 15,
1988.
Div. 2
,f a loan pursuant
t schedule for the
he interest to the
to such lower rate
that provided any
assumption b~ing
oduced by increas-
s subdivision shall
;it in the specified
fund exists, or the
neral fund of such
LSSistance as speci-
1easures to assure
979.)
Corporations § 183."i et •. ~ .. -'.(-,:
·f~
ecting a grant of a
:rument upon, real Ji,
\ which purports tf1
agent to display or;::
ble dimensions ad~.-··
~asonable restrain{;.
,$:;~'t:
-~~~r.-;j
ivell as prospective:.=~¥,
operate retrospec{,
. ·•.>;
.)f
by Stats.1975, c. 147;.
4.$:.{ft
l general effect of
,v. of 1965 Code
of Bar, 1965) pag
Part 1 CONDITIONS OF OWNERSHIP § 714
§ 713. Local regulations; signs advertising property for sale,
lease or exchange
Notwithstanding any provision of any ordinance, an owner of
real property or his agent may display or have display€9-on the
owner's property a sign of reasonable dimensions, as determined by
the city or county, advertising:
(a) That the property is for sale, lease, or exchange by the own-
er or his agent;
(b) The owner's or agent's name; and
(c) The owner's or agent's address and telephone number.
, Added by Stats.1975, c. 147, p. 281, § 2.)
Library References
~I u11i<-i11al Corporations e::,,002. C .. I.~. l\lunicipal Corporations~ 2'.!1.
§ 714. Solar energy system; prohibition or restriction of installa-
tion or use; invalidity and unenforceability of instni-
ments affecting real property; exceptions
Any covenant, restriction, or condition contained in any deed,
contract, security instrument, or other instrument affecting the
transfer or sale of, or any interest in, real property which effectively
prohibits or restricts the installation or use of a solar energy system
is void and unenforceable.
This section shall not apply to provisions which impose reason-
able restrictions on solar energy systems. However, it is the policy
or the state to promote and encourage the use of solar energy sys-
tems and to remove obstacles thereto. Accordingly, reasonable re-
strictions on a solar energy system are those restrictions which do
not significantly increase the cost of the system or significantly de-
crease its efficiency, or which allow for an alternative system of com-
parable cost and efficiency .
For the purposes of this section, "solar energy system" shall be
defined as set forth in Section 801.5.
( Added by Stats.1978, c. 1154, p. 3542, § 3.)
Historical Note
-~I Ion" 1, 2 of Stats.1978, c. 1154, p.
,..,.. l>rovi<le:
··~-1. This act shall be known and
"'1 •, 1.., cited as the California Solar
ll1t,1,. Act of 1978. ··~·· ~J •• -· The Legislature hereby finds
•-dttlarea that•
"(a) Solar ene~gy is a renewable, non-
S,C,llutln1 energy source.
·•(b) •rhe m1e of solar energy system11
will reduce the 11tate's de11endence on non-
renewahle fossil fuels, supplement existing
energy sources, and decrease the air and
water pollution which results from the
use of conventional energy sources. It is,
therefore, the policy of the state to en-
courage the use of solar energy systems.
In order to insure uniform application of
129
JOHN PATRICK LANE
Mayor
ELOISE BROWN
Mayor Pro Tern
JOHN GALLOWAY
Council member
CLINT HARPER, Ph.D.
Councilmember
BERNARDO M. PEREZ
Council member
MAUREEN W. WALL
City Clerk
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
PJR:MAR:crl
799 Moorpark Avenue
88157A/CHRONI
MOORPARK
STEVEN KUENY
City Manager
CHERYLJ. KANE
City Attorney
PATRICK RICHARDS, A.1.C.P.
KE KO RAND UK
Director of
Community Development
A. DENNIS DELZEIT
City Engineer
JOHN V. GILLESPIE
Chief of Police
THOMAS P. GENOVESE
City Treasurer
The Planning Conmission ~
Patrick J. Richards, Director of Community Development f
July 15, 1988 (PC meeting of 7/18/88)
APPEAL NO. AP-88-7 LE CLUB APARTMENTS -SIGN VIOLATION
This item was previously scheduled for the Commission's meeting of
July 5, 1988. At the time of continuance staff identified new
information received just prior to the meeting date relating to an
off-site LeClub sign. On the afternoon of July 5, 1988 it was
brought to our attention that a third off-site billboard
advertising LeClub apartments was seen. This sign is located on
Tierra Rejada Road just east of the 23 freeway in the
unincorporated area. The sign is 8' x 4 1 and is similar in
appearance to the·LeClub billboard on Los Angeles Avenue and Spring
Road.
This sign has been reported to the County Planning Department and
have no information as to how the County will handle this matter,
or if the sign is in violation of their codes.
Moorpark, California 93021 (805) 529-6864
MOORPARK
JOHN PATRICK LANE
Mayor
STEVEN KUENY
City Manager
ELOISE BROWN
Mayor Pro Tern
JOHN GALLOWAY
Councilmember
CHERYLJ.KANE
City Attorney
PATRICK RICHARDS, A.I.C.P.
CLINT HARPER, Ph.D.
Director of
Community Development
Councilmember
BERNARDOM. PEREZ
Councilmember
R. DENNIS DELZEIT
City Engineer
JOHN V. GILLESPIE
Chief of Police MAUREEN W. WALL
City Clerk
TO:
FROK:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
PJR:JS:crl
THOMAS P. GENOVESE
MEMORANDUM • City Treasurer
The Planning C0111Dission ~
Patrick J. Richards, Director of Conmnmity Developmen~
June 30, 1988 (PC meeting of 7/5/88)
APPEAL NO. AP-88-7 -LE CLUB APARTMENTS
Background
Two signs and three model sales flags are the subject of this
appeal. The signs include one off-site directional sign and one
on-site sign advertising apartment units available (for rent). The
property pertaining to these signs and flags is located at the
southeast corner of Los Angeles Avenue and Moorpark Avenue
(LeClub Apartments). No provisions exist in the municipal code
(Ord. 82 and Ord. 90) for signs and flags for rental unit
projects. Therefore, any tolerance of signs by the City has been
as a courtesy to the LeClub apartments. Sizes of signs and flags
and permitted duration of these items have now exceeded even
those that are permitted for a model tract complex in which units
are for sale. Provisions do exist for signs and flags in
ordinances 82 and 90 for units for saleonly. The on-site sign
measures l2'xi8' (96 sq. ft.) and is double-sided (total of 192
sq.ft.) 60 sq.ft. is the maximum permitted . The off-site sign is
also l2'x8' and has an additional 2'x12' sign (total of 120 sq. ft.)
32 sq. ft. is the limit. and is also double sided that provides a
grand total of 240 sq. ft. of off-site signage.
Ordinance No. 82 limits the time periods in which both on and off
site signs may be posted; the period is either two years or until
the last unit is first sold, whichever occurs first. The last unit
rented has long since occurred. Therefore, the Director of
Community Development has determined that the signs should have
been removed following the rental of the last unit.
Pursuant to Ordinance No. 90 the flags were permitted to remain
for one year or until the last unit is first sold; both of these
two events have now occurred. The flags could have been
799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark, California 93021 (805) 529-6864
8929D/CH!:W!H
PJR:JS:crl
8829D/CHRONI
June 30, 1988 7
Page 2
maintained for up to one additional year if a renewal had been
requested and granted. A renewal was not requested. (Again this
applies only to units for sale.)
The applicant maintains that now the signs should be allowed to
remain. They now serve the purpose of a business sign because
an on-going business exists of maintaining an apartment complex
and the need to attract customers to promote the business. The
municipal code does not permit business signs in residential zones.
The following is a chronology of events leading to this appeal:
February 9, 1988 -Telephone contact was made with Louri
Wright, property manager for the LeClub apartments. Code
enforcement discussed the time permits for model pole flags and
construction signs with Mr. Wright and asked that the sign be
removed within two weeks.
March 17, 1988 - A notice of violation was issued to the LeClub
apartment property manager for maintaining pole flags and was
requested to remove flags by March 20, 1988.
March 22, 1988 -Property inspection showed signs had not
been removed. LeClub apartments was contacted by phone and
asked to remove signs.
April 7, 1988 -Notice of violation was issued to LeClub
apartments new property manager Jack Shelling for maintaining
billboards and pennants. He was asked to remove signs by
April 10, 1988.
April 14, 1988 -Property inspection revealed the signs and
pennants at LeClub had not been removed, Mr. Shelling was
contacted by phone and asked to remove signs.
April 18, 1988 -Second notice of violation was issued to
LeClub property manager Jack Shelling for illegal signs, and
pennants. It was asked that all signs and pennants be
r-en1oved no iate,-LI:d:': -~~ri: 20, 1988
April 21, 1988 -Larry Miller attorney for LeClub apartments
wrote to the City of Moorpark requesting extension of time to
remove the signs in violation.
May 26, 1988 -Code enforcement contacted Larry Miller
attorney for the LeClub apartments and asked that the billboard
signs on and off site as well as pennants be removed by May
30, 1988. Mr. Miller agreed.
June 1, 1988 -Attorney for the LeClub apartments met with
Patrick J. Richards, Director of Community Development in
regards to billboard signs. Mr. Miller explained the rental of
the LeClub apartments was a business and asked if the
billboard signs could remain under Section 9.50.040(a) of the
PJRrJS:crl
8829D/CHRONI
June 30, 1988
Page 3
Moorpark Municipal Code (a Business Class Sign). The
Director explained that this particular section of the code did
not apply to a residential zone, but to a commercial zone only.
Mr. Miller asked how he could have the code revised to allow
for the billboard advertising signs relating to LeClub. The
Director explained that LeClub could appeal his decision to the
Planning Commission and then the City Council.
Discussion
The appellant claims "it is impossible to distinguish LeClub
apartments from the many townhouses and single family planned
developments which are not available for rent. Yet the appellant
has a colorful sign which is built into the perimeter of the wall
which reads "LeClub Moorpark Apartments." This sign can clearly
be seen by traffic passing in both directions on Los Angeles and
Moorpark Avenues. the LeClub apartments maintains directional
signs which advertise leasing of the apartments (see Exhibit 1-5).
The appellants records show that approximately one half of those
who come to view the units do so as a result of seeing signs
indicating the availability of the apartments. LeClub's colorful
perimeter sign and leasing signs are located on the corner of Los
Angeles and Moorpark Avenues. This is near a signal and it may
very well be that one-half of the interested parties views and
response to the approved identification sign. They are not yet
aware of ground sign further east.
The appellant draws attention to the on-premises sign which they
say was erected in early 1987. The appellant states "the signs are
not billboards as they advertise apartment availability on site.
The municipal code does not address whether a billboard advertises
on site or not. The municipal code just states all billboat·d signs
are prohibited. Besides the on site billboard the appellant is
willing to discuss, there is also an off site billboard advertising
LeClub which is located on Spring Road, Sec. 9.50.030(b) MMC,
prohibits any off site advertising (see Exhibits 1 & 2).
The City of Moorpark is a fast developing community and will
someday have many apartment complexes, all of which will be
located in residential zones. The City of Moorpark has designed a
sign ordinance which provides enterprise a means to identify name,
location and property for sale or lease, while at the same time
protecting the general public from the proliferation of signs that
can cause a deterioration of the character, environment and
economic well being of the community.
Available Options
1. The Planning Commission can permit LeClub apartments to keep
existing construction signs;
PJR:JS:crl
8829D/CHRONI
June 30, 1988
Page 4
2. The Planning Commission can request the City Council to
approve revisions of the sign ordinance; or
3. The Planning Commission can uphold the Director's decision and
request that the applicant remove all construction signs.
Recommended Action
Uphold the Director of Community Development decision that the
permitted time periods for the on and off site signs and flags have
been exceeded and direct the property owner to remove· such signs
permanently.
Exhibits: 1 & 2 Photographs of signs
3 -Ordinance Nos. 82 & 90
q
Monuments· at Los A ign (on-site)
ngeles A Moorpark A venue and· venue.
Same as ab . ove
pictured travelin
south on M g
A
oorpark
venue.
Flags t a entry
driveway to
rental off· ice.
:JO l -
Spring Road & Flinn Avenue
(off-site)
Eastbound on Los Angeles
Avenue (on-site)
-~_·.>;·a;:~-~-:--~-
. . . .. ..
~ .. • . . .
, .
~ ... • 4
--.
CLUB
Al'~
!SJ3,01ll
BACK TO
JI