Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAGENDA REPORT 1988 0907 CC REG ITEM 08C-2,,. MINUTES OF THE CITY COUNCIL Moorpark, California August 3, 1988 The Regular Meeting of the City Council of the City of Moorpark, California was held on August 3, 1988 in the Council Chambers of City Hall of said City, located at 799 Moorpark Avenue, Moorpark, California. 1. CALL TO ORDER The Meeting was called to order at 7:20 p.m. by Mayor John Lane. 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Councilmember Harper. 3. ROLL CALL Present: Councilmembers Eloise Brown, John Galloway, Clint Harper, Bernardo Perez and Mayor John Lane. Steven Kueny, City Manager; Cheryl Kane, City Attorney; Patrick Richards, Director of Community Development; Philip Newhouse, Director of Community Services; John Knipe, Assistant City Engineer; Lieutenant Mike Brown, Sheriff's Department; Maureen Wall, City Clerk; and Sally Coons, Executive Secretary. 4. PROCLAMATIONS, COMMENDATIONS, SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS No proclamations, commendations or special presentations were made. 5. REORDERING OF, AND ADDITIONS TO, THE AGENDA MOTION: seconded a Exemption" subsequent unanimous. Councilmember Brown moved and motion to add 11. K "Blue to the Agenda as an i tern of to the posting of the Agenda. Councilmember Harper Star Application for necessity which arose The voice vote was MOTION: Councilmember Brown moved and Councilmember Harper seconded a motion to add the following items for discussion in Closed Session, pursuant to the recommendation of the City Attorney: 14.H. -Kavian vs. Moorpark; 14.I. -Southern Pacific Transportation Company vs. the State Board of Equalization et. al; and 14. J. -A-C Construction vs. Moorpark. The voice vote was unanimous. 6. PUBLIC COMMENTS 6.A. Connie Lawrason (4291 Ambermeadow Street, Moorpark) introduced the Council to the Chairman of the Grand Jury, Leonard Harris, who was present in the audience. Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California 2 August 3, 1988 6.B. William Rice (5351 Oxbow, Las Vegas, Nevada) representing Circus D'Carlo, advised the Council they are attempting to meet all the requirements for issuance of their permit, and expect to open the circus in Moorpark this weekend. 6.C. Phil Vein (6685 Princeton Avenue, Moorpark) representing A & R Development Company, requested the Council consider redistributing the 53 residential allotments which were awarded to Urban West prior to their exemption by the courts. 6.D. Elaine Freeman (24005 Ventura Blvd., Calabasas) representing Griffin Homes, urged the Council to consider the redistribution of the 53 allotments this evening. 6.E. Joy Barrera (375 Millard Street, Moorpark) praised the Staff and Police Department for the excellent improvement in the downtown area. She urged the Council to consider an active park for the downtown area, and advised she was opposed to any light industrial use for the old high school site. 6. F. Angel Barrera (375 Millard Street, Moorpark) requested the Council consider making the future downtown park an "active" rather than "passive" park. 6.G. Marva Dreher (13290 Bodega Place, Moorpark) representing Blue Star Ready Mix urged the Council to consider supporting their permit exception to deliver concrete to the Highway 101 improvement project during off hours. She advised the Council that Blue Star has been an active participant in many City functions and the company and its employees patronize Moorpark businesses. 6.H. Tom Zanic (520 Broadway, Santa Maria, CA 90401) representing Urban West, requested the Council postpone action on Agenda Item 11.C. (Consider rev1s1on to the Tierra Rejada Road/Moorpark (Spring) Road Area of Contribution Report) to a future meeting. He advised the report was available only one day prior to the meeting which did not allow ample time for thorough review. 6. I. Linda Symchak (13647 Blacksmith, Moorpark) Secretary of the Marlborough Homeowner's Association, requested the Council allow the Marlborough tract identification sign at the southeast corner of Peach Hill and Spring Roads where it was located prior to its being moved for landscape installation. 6.J. Teresa Cortez (1015 Walnut Canyon Road, Moorpark) requested the Council consider requiring an alternate route for the Blue Star trucks to eliminate the noise on Walnut Canyon. She further requested that the Council consider the old high school site for a recreation facility. 6.K. Kenneth D. Lavet (12320 Rye Street, Studio City, CA 91604) representing NBC Productions, requested the Council consider Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California 3 August 3, 1988 allowing his company to do filming on High Street on August 4th. He advised that they had received tentative approval from the police and fire departments; had obtained a certificate of insurance; and signatures from the businesses on High Street. 6.L. Dan Howell (28898 Canwood Street, Agoura Hills) representing Kiewit Pacific Company, advised that his company is working on the Highway 101 improvement project. The specifications for concrete, prescribed by Cal Trans, substantially limited their sources. Blue Star was one of very few companies acceptable to the State. Additionally, Cal Trans requires that this portion of the construction be done on Friday and Saturday during late night and early morning hours. 6.M. Patrick Sandoval (8333 Happy Camp Road, Moorpark) representing Blue Star Ready Mix, requested the Council not oppose their request to the County for a temporary permit exemption. He reviewed Blue Star's support of community activities and financial contributions to City functions and projects. Mr. Sandoval advised that the specifications require the cement to be poured within a certain time after leaving the plant. Therefore, the most direct route to the project site was being utilized, i.e. Walnut Canyon Road. 6. N. John Newton ( 165 High Street, Suite 204, Moorpark) representing Blue Star Ready Mix, advised that he handled the processing of permits and took responsibility for not notifying the City of Blue Star's intention to request a temporary permit exemption from the County prior to that request being made. The exception is being requested for a period of 13 weekends, and is qualified by the fact that a public agency (CalTrans) issued the contract which requires off-hour work. RESPONSES FROM COUNCIL Councilmember Perez responded to Mrs. Barrera's comments by advising that he has a personal commitment to develop a downtown park. Additionally, he questioned Mr. Lavet with respect to his request for a filming permit; and Mr. Sandoval with respect to his request to obtain a temporary permit exception. Councilmember Brown responded to Mrs. Barrera, advising that there is no reason there can't be two downtown parks, one passive and one active. She further commented that if the high school site is developed, part of that would become a park. Councilmember Harper questioned Staff as to the necessity of the filming company obtaining a permit. City Manager Kueny advised that a permit is required, along with thirty days to process it. He advised the filming company presented its Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California 4 August 3, 1988 request on August 2nd for filming on August 4th. City Staff did not have ample time to process it, and therefore denied the applicant's request. Councilmember Galloway expressed concern that CalTrans did not address the impacts of the Highway 101 construction on the City of Moorpark. Councilmember Lane questioned whether Staff could process the permit for the circus scheduled to begin Friday. City Manager Kueny advised that Staff cannot wait until 5 p. m. Friday to have its conditions met. He also expressed concern that the tickets are indicating the circus is sponsored by the City of Moorpark; and that there is no acknowledgment from the property owner that the circus can use the lot where it is setting up. 7. COMMIITEE REPORTS No Committee reports were made. 8. CONSENT CALENDAR On a motion by Councilmember Harper, seconded by Councilmember Galloway, the following items were approved by a unanimous roll call vote of the Council: 8.A. Approval of Warrant Register -Prepaid Warrants No. 7013, 7098-7111, 7153-7156, 7158-7159 7161-7178, 7180-7181 -Payable Warrants No. 7203-7242 $ 43,837.89 $ 13,085.49 8.B. Consider the reduction of the grading bond for LDM-5/DP-318 (Kavlico). Staff recommended that the grading bond for LDM-5/DP-318 be reduced by 50%. 8.C. Consider approving the City Clerk's attendance at a training institute for public officials. Staff recommended the City Clerk's attendance be authorized. 8.E. Consider a request by A & R Construction for re-distribution of fifty-three 1987 residential permit allotments. Staff recommended that this matter be referred to City Staff, with a report back to Council on August 17, 1988. 8. F. Consider a report concerning the opening of Tierra Re j ada Road, south side. Staff recommended that this report be received and filed. 8.G. Consider a request by the Facilities Coordinator to attend a maintenance management training session. Staff recommended staff be authorized to attend the training session. Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California 5 August 3, 1988 8.H. Consider a report concerning the pedestrian bridge at the end of Liberty Bell Road. Staff recommended that the report be received and filed. 8.I. Consider authorizing expenditure of joint legal services for preparation Landfill Contract. Staff recommended expenditure of $702.00 be authorized. additional funds for of the Simi Valley that the additional The following items were pulled for individual consideration by the Council: 8. D. Consider approval of a change in the maintenance agreement between the City and I.B.M. for the computer system. City Staff requested this item be deferred agreement is completed and the cost determined. concurred with this request. until the The Council 8.J. Resolution No. 88-498. A proposed resolution adopting a truck route from the intersection of Tierra Rejada and Moorpark Road South (county road), east to the east City limit line. Staff recommended that the resolution be approved. Councilmember Brown advised that she is in concurrence with the Resolution, however she has a general concern with traffic and particularly trucks that bother residents in this area. Councilmember Harper concurred with Councilmember Brown and suggested additional signage prohibiting trucks on Tierra Rejada Road be installed. Discussion followed regarding the placement, wording and number of signs required by the proposed resolution. Staff advised that adoption of the resolution was necessary to meet the requirements of the CalTrans permit process by erecting the signs prior to opening of the bridge. After discussion, Council consensus outlined the following changes to the proposed resolution: 1) Additional signs on Los Angeles Avenue; 2) Signs reading "Local Deliveries Excepted"; and 3) Continue truck prohibition to east City boundary. Staff was directed to amend the proposed resolution for Council consideration later in the meeting. 8.K. Resolution No. 88-496. A proposed resolution establishing parking and stopping restriction zones along Peach Hill Road between Spring Road and Rolling Knoll Road. Councilmember Brown suggested that the entire distance on the south side of Peach Hill Road also be included in the no-parking and stopping restriction zones. Councilmember Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California 6 August 3, 1988 Galloway advised that the City's policy of collector streets is to have no-parking and, therefore, that portion of Peach Hill Road which qualifies as a collector street should be posted as no-parking. City Manager Kueny cautioned the Council that consideration must be given to residents on the subject streets, as well as visitors to the park. He recommended that the Council adopt the resolution as presented to allow enforcement of the signs which have already been installed; and that Staff be directed to study the entire Peach Hill area for appropriate no-parking zones and signage, and to bring an amended resolution to the Council for consideration when the study is completed. The Council directed streets be noticed no-parking zones. that the residents on of the City's intent the to affected establish MOTION: Councilmember Brown moved and Councilmember Harper seconded a motion to adopt Resolution No. 88-496 as presented; and to direct Staff to study the balance of the Peach Hill area and to report back with a modified resolution if necessary. The voice vote was unanimous. 8.L. Resolution No. 88-497. A proposed resolution amending Resolution No. 88-488 and Resolution No. 88-489 for the purpose of clarifying and making technical corrections to certain conditions of approval for Development Plan Permit Nos. DP-393 to 404 (Siegel & Associates, Inc.) In response to questioning by Councilmember Galloway, Director of Community Development Richards advised that the applicant has been advised and agrees to the changes being made to the conditions of the Development Plan Permit. MOTION: Councilmember Brown moved and Councilmember Galloway seconded a motion to adopt Resolution No. 88-497. The voice vote was unanimous. 9. PUBLIC HEARINGS No public hearings were scheduled. 10. COMMENTS FROM COUNCILMEMBERS Councilmember Brown requested that Fillmore be added to the next consideration. the city bus agenda for proposal from the Council's Councilmember Perez questioned whether or not the City had authority to remove an abandoned vehicle parked off the road on Los Angeles Avenue. Lt. Brown will check into this. In response to another question from Councilmember Perez, City Manager Kueny Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California 7 August 3, 1988 advised that the report on the truck scales is overdue from CalTrans and will be transmitted to the Council upon receipt. 10. A Consider the appointment of a Council ad hoc committee to meet with Supervisor Dougherty regarding concerns relative to the Waterworks District #1 Feasibility Study, and proposed planning projects within the County's jurisdiction. By Council consensus, Councilmembers Brown appointed to the ad hoc committee to meet Dougherty regarding concerns relative to District #1 Feasibility Study. and Harper were with Supervisor the Waterworks 10.B Consider the appointment of two members of the Council to an ad hoc committee to review the Downtown Plan with recommendations to be brought back to Council so a final plan can be adopted. By Council consensus, Councilmembers Galloway and Perez were appointed to the ad hoc committee to review the Downtown Plan and make recommendations to the Council. 10.C Consider the designation of a voting delegate for the League of California Cities' Annual Conference. By Council consensus, Mayor Pro Tern Brown was designated as the voting delegate for the City at the League of California Cities' Annual Conference. 11. DISCUSSION/ACTION ITEMS 11.A Consider the placement of a traffic device at the pedestrian crossing located at Moorpark Avenue and Second Street. Staff recommended that the Council give direction as deemed appropriate. Assistant City Engineer Knipe reviewed the Staff report presented to the Council in July, advising that it will take several weeks to get the permit from Cal Trans for installation of the flashing yellow light. Councilmember Brown questioned the location of the crosswalk, and suggested that other locations be considered. Lt. Brown advised that the flashing yellow light is the best device for this purpose. Signs and striping would be the next best alternative. He concurred that the location of the crosswalk and/or flashing yellow light could be re-evaluated. Discussion continued including where the crosswalk(s) and warning devices should be installed. Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California 8 August 3, 1988 MOTION: Councilmember Perez moved and Councilmember Galloway seconded a motion to direct Staff to proceed with obtaining the necessary permits for the installation of the flashing light. Assistant Engineer Knipe suggested that a study be made of the entire corridor, with a recommendation to Council for the ultimate placement of the crosswalks in this area. He estimated it would take approximately three weeks to coordinate with Lt. Brown and CalTrans, and produce the report. MOTION WITIIDRAWN: Councilmember Perez withdrew his motion, and Councilmember Galloway withdrew his second. The Council directed that the City Engineer prepare a report on all options for crosswalks and signalization on Moorpark Road in the vicinity of Second Street, to be presented to the Council on September 7, 1988. 11. B Consider a draft Request for Proposal (RFP) to update the City's Land Use and Circulation Elements for the General Plan. Staff recommended this item be continued until August 17, 1988. MOTION: Councilmember Harper moved and Councilmember Galloway seconded a motion to continue this item to the meeting of August 17, 1988, pursuant to Staff's recommendation. The voice vote was unanimous. 11.C Consider revision to the Tierra Rejada Road/Moorpark (Spring) Road Area of Contribution Report. Staff recommended that the report be revised to reflect current cost estimates. City Manager Kueny suggested that the Council adopt the Staff's recommendation for revisions to the Tierra Rejada Road/Moorpark Road Area of Contribution Report, and to re-calendar the item to allow public testimony to accommodate the request of Tom Zanic (Urban West) during the Public Comment portion of the Agenda. MOTION: Councilmember Harper moved and Councilmember Galloway seconded a motion to adopt the revised report, and re-schedule the item on August 17, 1988 to receive public comment. The voice vote was unanimous . 11.D Consider Appeal No. AP-88-9 (Dr. David Stepitus) concerning a decision of the Planning Commission to require a planned development permit for the use of a single family residence as a medical office in a C-P-D zone, when the residence would first be used for commercial purposes. Staff recommended that the decision of the Planning Commission be upheld. Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California 9 August 3, 1988 The Council determined to waive the rules of procedure and allow Dr. Stepitus an opportunity to speak on this matter. Director of Community Development Richards advised that the applicant is requesting to use a single family residence (located in a commercial zone) for a dental office. It was Staff's recommendation, and later a decision of the Planning Commission, to require a Planned Development Permit since this is the first time this property will be used for its proposed use in a commercial zone. This Permit process allows the City an opportunity to appropriately review the property, impose any conditions necessary to adequately accommodate the proposed use, as well as verify parking requirements and establish setbacks appropriate to the particular site. Paul Lawrason, Planning Commissioner, spoke to the Council advising that it was his personal opinion that this type of business should be encouraged and further stated he voted against requiring a Planned Development Permit for this reason. Dr. Stepitus advised that working out of the residence would allow him to have a lower overhead. AT THIS POINT IN THE MEETING, the Council recessed, the time being 8:55 p.m. At 9:15 p.m., the full Council reconvened. After continued discussion regarding the necessity of a Planned Development Permit, the Council determined to delay action on this item until consideration of Agenda Item 11.H. (Consider a requirement for Commercial Planned Development Permit for all commercial zoning districts). 11. E. Consider a report concerning the placing of a flashing yellow beacon at the intersection of Spring Road and Roberts Avenue. Staff recommended they be directed as deemed appropriate. Assistant City Engineer Knipe advised that CalTrans has approved the installation of a flashing yellow light at the intersection of Spring Road and Roberts Avenue. The City has three alternatives to consider: 1) Process a cooperative agreement with CalTrans so that CalTrans will fund 50% of the final design and construction costs -estimated 24 months to complete project; 2) Process a cooperative agreement with CalTrans parallel with beginning the final design work so that CalTrans will fund 50% of the construction costs - estimated 18 months to complete project; or 3) Proceed with design and construction 100% funded by the City -estimated 12 months to complete project. Total cost of the project is estimated at $35,000. Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California 10 August 3, 1988 MOTION: Councilmember Harper moved and Councilmember Perez seconded a motion to direct the City Engineer to begin cooperative agreement processing with CalTrans and begin final design work so that CalTrans will fund 50% of construction costs. The voice vote was unanimous. The Council directed that they be advised as soon as CalTrans makes a final determination as to the funding and timing of this project. 11.F. Consider a report regarding the proposed placement of a Marlborough tract identification sign at the southeast corner of Peach Hill and Spring Roads. Staff recommended that the placement of the sign be denied. City Manager Kueny advised that the requested location of the sign is within the landscaped area on the southwest corner of Peach Hill and Spring Roads. This is public right-of-way and any placement of a sign within this area is considered an encroachment. Additionally, this prominent location is the entrance to a number of developments. MOTION: Councilmember Brown moved and Councilmember Perez seconded a motion to authorize the sign to be placed in the same location as it was prior to its removal for the installation of landscaping on the southeast corner of Peach Hill and Spring Roads. The voice vote was unanimous. AT THIS POINT IN THE MEETING, the Council advised Mr. Lavit that it was supporting Staff's decision to deny a filming permit to NBC for August 4, 1988. 11.G. Consider a report on the status of Hoc Committee and possible further committee. Staff recommended they be appropriate by the Council. the Redevelopment Ad direction to the directed as deemed City Manager Kueny advised that in January, 1988, the Council assigned the Committee to review seven items, and to report back to the Council with recommendations in April, 1988. Since that date, the Committee has met five times and has not finalized a joint recommendation. Five items remain to be reviewed by the Committee, and Staff recommends that a joint meeting between the Redevelopment Agency and the Committee be held to receive a consensus or individual opinions from the Committee. MOTION: Councilmember Harper moved and Councilmember Perez seconded a motion to set a joint meeting between the Redevelopment Agency and the Redevelopment Ad Hoc Committee for August 23, 1988 at 7:00 p.m. for the purpose of receiving the Committee's joint or individual recommendations and allow the Committee to decide if they want to meet as a Committee prior to the joint meeting. The voice vote was unanimous. Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California 11 August 3, 1988 11.H. Consider a requirement for Commercial commercial Planned zoning Development (CPD) Permit for all districts. Staff recommended they be directed as deemed appropriate by the Council. Director of Community Development Richards advised the Council that not all new or modified commercial activities require the issuance of a Commercial Planned Development Permit, thus by-passing the City's opportunity to consider uses, review the property and impose appropriate conditions to alleviate any concerns, including sufficient parking. Staff was prepared to recommend the Council consider requiring a CPD Permit for all new commercial uses; however, a further analysis has indicated additional in-depth studying must be completed before a recommendation is made. Staff, therefore, requested additional time to complete the study. MOTION: Councilmember Harper moved and Councilmember Brown seconded a motion to refer this item back to Staff for further analysis; to be brought back to the Council for consideration when the study is completed. The voice vote was unanimous. 11.D. Consider App ea 1 No. AP-88-9 (Dr. David Stepitus) concerning a decision of the Planning Commission to require a planned development permit for the use of a single family residence as a medical office in a C-P-D zone, when the residence would first be used for commercial purposes. (Continued from earlier in the meeting). MOTION: Councilmember Harper moved and Councilmember Perez seconded a motion to sustain the decision of the Planning Commission; to direct Staff to process the CPD Permit and to expedite in every manner possible, with a public hearing scheduled within 90 days of the application being deemed complete. The motion carried, with Councilmembers Brown and Galloway dissenting. 11. I. Consider giving direction to the Commission concerning introduction to naming of the community park. Staff directed as deemed appropriate. Parks and Recreation the public of the recommended they be Councilmember Galloway recommended that the Park and Recreation Commission follow up on developing competition for naming the park; and that an activity be scheduled for the community park before it is developed. Director of Community Services Newhouse advised that the Commission is already working on both these items and will be discussing them further at their the next meeting. MOTION: Councilmember Harper moved and Councilmember Brown seconded a motion to refer this item back to the Park and Recreation Commission for their recommendation for an event to be held at the community park site and the announcing of the name. Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California 12 August 3, 1988 11.J. Consider direction to the Parks and Recreation Commission concerning potential improvements for downtown park(s). Staff recommended they be directed as deemed appropriate. Councilmember Harper suggested that the Park and Recreation Commission be directed to supply an inventory of desired improvements proposed for the downtown park so that the Council has some concept of what is desired. MOTION: Councilmember Brown moved and Councilmember Harper seconded a motion directing that a list of potential improvements for the downtown park(s) be developed, along with input from residents of the community; that responses from seniors be activity solicited and that the varying needs of the community be considered, not limiting input to those residents who attend the meetings. 11.K. Consideration of Blue Star Ready Mix Temporary Permit City Manager Kueny advised that the County issued a temporary permit to Blue Star Ready Mix for off-hour transporting of concrete to the Ventura Freeway project. The County is now considering extending that temporary permit for an additional 12 to 13 weeks. By concensus, the Council determined to waive the rules and allow the proponent(s) of Blue Star Ready Mix to address the Council. Director of Community Development Richards advised that the County made an analysis of the two routes, Walnut Canyon and Grimes Canyon, from the Blue Star plant to the project. The County concluded the Grimes Canyon route was not as safe for the large trucks. If it were used, however, the County would require Blue Star to post a $50,000 bond for road repairs. The Grimes Canyon route is 5.4 miles longer, with an additional ten to fifteen minutes travel time. The Council expressed concern that the City was not notified of the permit exemption until it was issued, and the residents on Walnut Canyon are experiencing noise disturbance from the early morning and late evening hours of truck travel to and from the job site. John Newton, representing Blue Star Ready the exemption was for only one weekend, requesting that the exemption be extended 12 weekends to complete the job. Mix, advised that however they are for an additional AT THIS POINT IN THE MEETING, the Council recessed, the time being 10:55 p.m. At 11:10 p.m., the full Council reconvened. The Mayor called for a reordering of the Agenda. continue with the adopted Agenda. It was determined to Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California 13 August 3, 1988 MOTION: Councilmember Harper moved and Councilmember Brown seconded a motion to direct Staff to oppose the proposed permit exception and prepare an appeal if the County approves an extension of the permit exception for an additional 12 weekends; but to advise the County that during the potential appeal, the City would not object to the use of Grimes Canyon or other alternate route. The voice vote was unanimous. 12. ORDINANCES 12. A. Ordinance No. 99. A proposed ordinance amending the municipal code by adding Chapter 10. 02 relative to animal control ( curbing of animals). Staff recommended that the proposed ordinance be approved for first reading and introduction. City Attorney Kane advised the draft ordinance should be amended to reflect that a violation of the ordinance would be considered an infraction and not a misdemeanor. MOTION: Motion was made by Councilmember Harper, seconded by Councilmember Brown to waive further reading and declare Ordinance No. 99 read in title only. The voice vote was unanimous. MOTION: Councilmember Harper moved and Councilmember Brown seconded a motion to declare Ordinance No. 99 introduced and read, as amended, for the first time. The voice vote was unanimous. 12.B. Ordinance No. 100. A proposed ordinance rescinding the City's previous flood damage prevention ordinance and setting forth a new flood damage prevention ordinance. Staff recommended that the proposed ordinance be approved for first reading and introduction. MOTION: Councilmember Perez moved and Councilmember Brown seconded a motion to waive further reading and declare Ordinance No. 100 read in title only. The voice vote was unanimous. MOTION: Councilmember Galloway moved and Councilmember Perez seconded a motion to declare Ordinance No. 100 introduced and read for the first time. The voice vote was unanimous. 8.J. Resolution No. 88-498. A proposed resolution adopting a truck route from the intersection of Tierra Rejada and Moorpark Road South ( county road) 1 east to the east City limit line. Assistant City Engineer, John Knipe, presented the revisions to Resolution No. 88-498 as directed by Council. MOTION: Councilmember Harper moved and Councilmember Perez seconded a motion to adopt Resolution No. 88-498, as amended. The motion carried, with Councilmember Galloway dissenting. Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California 13. FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS 14 August 3, 1988 Councilmember Brown requested that the bus service be considered on a future agenda. 14. CLOSED SESSION MOTION: Councilmember Harper moved and Councilmember Perez seconded a motion to go into Closed Session under items: 14.C. - Litigation concerning BIA; 14.E. -Personnel discussion pursuant to Government Code Section 54957.6; 14.F. -Litigation concerning Boething vs. the City of Moorpark; 14.G. -Litigation concerning the City of Moorpark vs. Boething; 14.H. -Kavian vs. Moorpark; 14.I. Southern Pacific Transportation Company vs. Board of Equalization; and 14. J. -A-C Construction vs. Moorpark. The voice vote was unanimous. The time of adjournment to Closed Session was 11:40 p.m. All Councilmembers plus Steven Kueny, City Manager; Cheryl Kane, City Attorney; Lisa Kranitz, City Attorney's office; and Pat Richards, Director of Community Development were present for the Closed Session. The full Council reconvened in Open Session at the hour of 12:08 p. m. Cheryl Kane stated there was no action to report from the Closed Session. 15. ADJOURNMENT MOTION: Councilmember Harper moved and Councilmember Perez seconded a motion to adjourn the meeting until 6:00 p.m., August 17, 1988. ATTEST: Maureen W. Wall City Clerk min.3aug88 John Patrick Lane Mayor