Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAGENDA REPORT 1989 1004 CC REG ITEM 11D.. ELOISE BROWN Mayor 3ERNARDO M. PEREZ Mayor Pro Tern :;UNT HARPER, Ph. D. Council member PAUL LAWRASON Councilmember ;con MONTGOMERY Councilmember RICHARD T. HARE City Treasurer MOORPARK MEMORANDUM To: The Honorable City Council From: John F. Knipe, Assistant City Date: September 27, 1989 Subject: MCDONALD'S PROPERTY TRAFFIC STUDY SCOPE OF WORK DISCUSSION ,,~.3c~,) ITEM / I,[) . STEVEN KUENY City Manager CHERYLJ. KANE City Attorney PATRICK RICHARDS, A.I.C.P . Director of Community Development R. DENNIS DELZEIT City Engineer JOHN V. GILLESPIE Chief of Police At the September 6, 1989 meeting, Council directed staff to prepare a draft scope of work for a Traffic study of the McDonald's site. This draft scope is attached for Council review. Once this scope is approved by recommending the following procedure the McDonald's request: Council, staff is in the processing of 1. City and McDonald's Corporation execute contract regarding City's processing of their request. 2. Staff prepares Request for Proposals. 3. Council's Community Development Committee evaluates proposals. 4. Developer deposits necessary funds for Traffic Study with the City. Deposit to provide for city, consultant and City Attorney's time. 5. Council authorizes Award of Contract. 6. Consultant prepares traffic study. 7. Staff reviews first draft submittal. 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark, California 93021 (805) 529-6864 Page -2- 8. Staff reviews second draft submittal with Community Development Committee. 9. Staff submits final draft to City Council for approval. RECOMMENDED ACTION Direct staff as deemed appropriate. JFK: jg Attachment copy: Steve Kueny, City Manager Pat Richards, Director of Community Development Mark Wessel, City Traffic Engineer PN 30500/1001/021 30499/1002/021 BMO640.Con MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA City Council Meeting of ---,..,_::H~::;__- ELOISE BROWN Mayor BERNARDO M. PEREZ Mayor Pro Tern CLINT HARPER, Ph. D. Council member PAUL LAWRASON Council member SCOTT MONTGOMERY Councilmember RICHARD T. HARE City Treasurer MOORPARK PROFESSIONAL SERVICES REQUEST CITY OF MOORPARK STEVEN KUENY City Manager CHERYLJ. KANE City Attorney PATRICK RICHARDS, A.I.C.P. Director of Community Development R. DENNIS DELZEIT City Engineer JOHN V. GILLESPIE Chief of Police The City of Moorpark is requesting proposals from private consultants to provide traffic analysis services which will evaluate the traffic impacts of a proposed 5,000 square foot McDonalds restaurant (4,500 sq.ft. now with 500 sq.ft. future addition) with related retail/restaurant space uses on a 3. 86 acre site located at the northeast corner of Spring Road and Los Angeles Avenue. This intersection is c urrently the most heavily traffic impacted intersection in the City. Because the proposed development would entail a General Plan Amendment, the required traffic analysis will be comprehensive in nature, analyzing a number of variables for different scenarios. Due to the uncertainty of future conditions, a thorough analysis of many different combinations of variables is deemed necessary. The following are the major interests the City has regarding this proposal: 1. The central focus of this traffic ev a luation is to determine impacts of this proposed project to the adjacent intersection and surrounding area plus an identification of deta i led mitigation measures to reduce or eliminate the impacts. 2. To provide a comprehensive picture of existing, cumulative and ultimate traffic impacts to the City c aused by this project. 3. To graphically illustrate all analysis and proposals for resolution. 4. To recommend and develop specific objectives, programs or standards that this project must use to eliminate its impacts and cause the adjacent intersection to better it 's forecasted Level of Service. Scope of Work Will Include 1 . A complete traffic analysis that conforms to the City's Traffic Study Guidelines and as further detailed in the following. '99 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark, California 93021 (805) 529-6864 Page 2 2. An analysis of the entire 3. 86 acre site based upon a 5,000 sq. ft. McDonalds fast food restaurant with drive thru lane, with and without a 34,000 sq.ft . of retail/restaurant space (28,000 sq.ft. retail and 6,000 sq .ft. additional restaurant). Th e analysis of the 5,000 sq.ft. fast food restaurant shall be with use of the highest range of rates per 1,000 sq.ft. gross floor area; we e kday, Saturday and Sunday (a.m. and p.m. peaks). 3. Trip generation factors shall be obtained from the 1988 ITE publication entitled Transportation and Land Development or its latest edition. 4. Traffic generation factors for the fast food restaurant shall be based on both 10 and 25 percent by-pass fa c to r s for weekday, Saturday and Sunday. 5. Identify project impacts to the follow i ng intersection estimated level of service for each of the follow i ng scenarios: a.) existing, b.) cumulative and c.) ultimate. a. Spring Road and New Los Angeles Avenue b. Los Angeles Avenue and Moorpark Avenue c. Los Angeles Avenue and Liberty Bell Road d. Los Angeles Avenue and Maureen Lane e. Los Angeles Avenue and Gabbert/Tierra Rejada Roads f. New Los Angeles Avenue and Science Drive g. New Los Angeles Avenue and future freeway on/off ramps. h. Spring Road and Peach Hill Road i. Spring Road and Tierra Rejada Road j. Spring Road/High Street/Los Angeles Avenue 6. Identify the potential impacts of the 118/23 freeway connection, as quantified by street and intersection levels of service. It is anticipated that the primary scenar io wi ll be general plan build-out if the Carlsberg Specific Plan a nd general plan amendments are approved, with a second scenar i o based on a ll development preceding the freeway connection. 7. Recommended right-of-way and numb e r o f lanes required (including parking) and street section recomm endat i ons (with graphics) for Spring Road and Los Angeles Avenue which will b r ing the level of service to each of the following LOS; "c", "D" and "E" for a.m. and p.m. peaks. 8. Provide an analysis of the effects of the extension of New Los Angeles Avenue to Collins Drive as it would r el at e to the subject site. 9. Provide an analysis of project impacts on at least two other sites in the City, one of which must be a mid-block site. The City to select sites. 10. Provide an analysis of the subject site as if built with permitted multi-family apartments at 15 u . p .a. a nd with a 25% density bonus at 18 u.p.a. PROREQ.DOC 11. 12. Page 3 All evaluations shall include both the a .m. and p .m. peak periods. Provide an analysis regarding vehicle access points to the subject site. Analysis shall consider shared access with adjacent property. Several scenarios shall be included along with evaluation of advantages/disadvantages. Provide graph i cs for all scenarios. PROREO.DOC