HomeMy WebLinkAboutAGENDA REPORT 1996 0403 CC REG ITEM 10GL�vq,/D. .
AGENDA REPORT
TO: The Honorable City Council
FROM: Paul Porter, Senior Planne,
DATE: March 27, 1996 (CC Meeting of April 3,
„y COJncil Meef;n
f ll11 d 199,/--,�
ACiIOt�T� trn'
1996)
SUBJECT: CONSIDER REQUEST BY A. DEEWAYNE JONES, D.D.S FOR THE
CITY TO INITIATE A GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT FOR A FOUR
ACRE PARCEL LOCATED CONTIGUOUS WITH THE SOUTHWEST
QUADRANT OF MISSION BELL - PHASE 2 (ASSESSOR'S PARCEL
NO. 511-08-42)
Background
The applicant is requesting permission to concurrently process a
General Plan Amendment, Zone Change, Tentative Parcel Map and
Commercial Planned Development Permit. The property consists of
approximately 176,625 square feet with approximately 471 feet of
frontage along Los Angeles Avenue. The proposed project is bound
by residential properties on both the north and west and has a
Land Use Designation of M (Median Density Residential).
Staff does not accept an application for a General Plan Amendment
unless the City Council concurs with the initiation of the
requested amendment.
Discussion
The applicant's request is to authorize staff to process a
General Plan Amendment for a change in the existing M (Median
Density Residential) land use designation of the property in the
Land Use Element of the General Plan to C-2 (General Commercial).
The proposed change to the Land Use Designation of the General
Plan and zone change to CPD would make the applicant's proposed
project consistent with the allowed uses on the land.
The applicant's proposed development would consist of a General
Plan Amendment, Zone Change, three lot Tentative Parcel Map and a
Commercial Planned Development for three buildings. Parcel 1
would consist of a two story 12,000 square foot office building
and would be located west of the existing commercial development;
Parcel 2 would be located easterly of existing residential
properties and would contain a 5,500 square foot restaurant; and
Parcel 3 would be developed with a multistory 53,000 square foot
office building.
Staff Analysis
The request for a C-2 General Commercial Land Use Designation
would be consistent with the existing land use (Mission Bell
000267
Plaza) designation to the east of the proposed development but
could create compatibility problems with the adjacent residences
to the residential properties to the north and west. For
example, a restaurant may create sufficient noise in the parking
area to adversely affect the residents in the area and an office
building in excess of two stories may create an adverse visual
impact to the residences.
Consistency with City Council Guidelines for Screening of General
Plan Amendments
Resolution No. 94-1055 adopted by the City Council on August 17,
1994 established criteria to be used by the City Council as
justification to deny or approve the processing of a General Plan
Amendment (see attachment No. 3). The proposed General Plan
Amendment coupled with commercial development that would be
considered compatible with the residential properties to the west
and north could be considered consistent with the following
criteria for approving the processing of a General Plan
Amendment:
1. The proposed amendment request is consistent with or
has a potential for consistency with the City's General
Plan, including applicable goals and policies.
2. The proposed amendment request is compatible with or
has a potential for compatibility with either existing
or planned uses for the surrounding properties.
3. The proposed amendment request has the potential for
conformity with other City Council adopted policies.
4. The proposed amendment request has the potential to
provide, through the project approval process, public
improvements, public services, public amenities, and/or
financial contributions that the City Council
determines to be of substantial public benefit to the
community.
Review of Proposal by Community Development Committee
Staff will be discussing the applicant's proposal with the
Community Development Committee at it's meeting of April 1, 1996
and will report the Committee's comments to the City Council at
the April 3, 1996 meeting.
Concurrent Processing of General Plan Amendment with other
Discretionary Projects
Processing a General Plan Amendment and Zone Change together is a
legislative act which does not have time constraints for
completion. However, other discretionary projects such as a
F
Tentative Parcel Map and Commercial Planned Development must be
completed within specified time frames once the projects are
deemed complete. Processing a Zone Change and General Plan
Amendment without a Tentative Parcel Map and Commercial Planned
Development would alleviate the problem of exhausting the case
processing time constraints as required by the Streamlining Act.
Recommendations:
1. Direct staff to accept a General Plan Amendment to change of
Land Use Designation from M to C-2.
2. Authorize staff to accept an application for processing a
Tentative Parcel Map, Zone Change and Commercial Planned
Development Permit after the General Plan Amendment is heard
by the Planning Commission at a public hearing.
Attachments: 1. Letter from Applicant
2. Proposed Plot Plan
3. Resolution No. 94-1055
3
A. DEEWAYNE JOKES, D.D.S
FAMILY DENTAL CARE 722 E. MAIN STREET
SAWA PAUTA, CALIFORNIA 93W
February 27, 1996 (805) 525.7464 • 525.3001
The Honorable Paul W. Lawrason, Hayor
City of Moorpark
799 Moorpark Avenue
Moorpark, California 93021
Re: Pre Application n Medical Arts Plaza Project n 4 Acre
Gisler Property APN 511-08-42
Dear Mayor Lawrason and Members of the City Council:
I am asking the Council to approve my Pre Application for a
Medical Arts Complex and related Commercial on the 4 Acre
Gisler property. It is located and contigious with the S/W
Quadrant of the Albertson's Shopping Center to the East and
Los Angeles Avenue to the South.
It is bounded on the North and West by SFR. The property was
in escrow for over a year to a developer who wanted to build
SFR's. He could not make the numbers work so he cancelled
the escrow last fall.
It has been my dream to build a Medical Arts building where
Hedical/Dental and related Health Professions could come
together in one beautiful location to better serve the needs
of our Community.
This property caught my eye for several reasons.... It
seemed to be an extension of the Albertson's Shopping Center
....there is good visibility.... there would be good access
from the signal at Liberty Bell Road .... the project would be
a nice transition from R-1 to the Shopping Center.... storm
drain and Los Angeles Avenue improvements already completed
....the site is centrally located to all areas of the City
....and it became available again:
The project would consist of two (2) retail pads and a
multiple story Medical Office building of approximated 53,000
square feet.
I'm asking you to approve my Pre Application and allow me to
process the GPA, CPD, Zone Change and Tentative Parcel Map
concurrently.
Thank you for your consideration.
Res 'tfuily Su muted,
A. DeeWayne ones, D.D.S.
ADJ.sj¢'
ATTACHMENT 1
0
z
m
cf)
m
0 <
m
K
o 0
0 -U
r7i
m Z
. --j
0101 I>
z
1
h
f
AD.
�(Ii�, - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - -
- I--,-- . -f
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - -- -
L
PARCE
PHASE 2
n
. ;: i
i PARCEL 7
i
10
�
U
'ARCEL-2—
6
SUBrPIIASF A L
S OP"A!' THEATPE
� -
— ------------
SV—HASE A
SUG�PHAS
�ARCE L
Jo
U4
I-AkEt 3
rn
PARCEL 5
L
I
SUB -PHASE o
A
--2f
PHASE I
i. J LI
TFc" i,2
C=
C)
>
3- -..a- f
I ..�-! _..l __— _. ..__.._--_ __ I lip i I � I, I I 1 .
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
T
u' - ----- -
LI i III L&ILLI Uj i
SHOPS IB
--------------------------------------
PARK LANE
ATTACHMENT 2
1 nC(tuy 0t1Lit)', Wi(Jer penalty
of perjury, H-;%t the attached is
a true and co+.n:1:;t cod y of the
Origina; r oc urnent ,ivhicfi is on
file in this office.
RESOLUTION NO. 94- 1055
Executed on 9- 9
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE 11'Y rpa' k, ^ lifornia.
OF MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA, RESCINDING RESOLUTION NO. 85-209 AND ADOPTING NEW GUIDELINES
11'UR THE
SCREENING OF GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT REQUESTS Ci lerk
WHEREAS, Resolutioni`No, 85-209 established guidelines
screening of General Plan amendments; and for the
WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that Resolution No-,=-
85-209 should be revised; and
WHEREAS, Government Code Section 65300 directs the adoption of
a comprehensive, long-term General Plan for the
physical
development of the City and of any land outside its boundaries
which in the planning agency's judgment bears relation to its
planning; and
WHEREAS, Government Code Section 65358 provides for the
amendment of the General Plan; and
WHEREAS, the City Council deems it desirable to continue to
pre-screen all requests for General Plan amendments and determine,
based on adopted criteria, those re
ests for which
accept a formal General Plan amendment application. the City shall
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CALIFORNIA, RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: CITY OF MOORPARK,
SECTION 1. Resolution No. 85-209 is hereby rescinded in its
entirety.
SECTION 2. The following criteria will be used by the City
Council as justification to deny the processing of a General Plan
amendment request:
1• The proposed amendment re
similarities with other amendment requests for nificproperties
locatedlocated in the same general area of the City or its Area
Of Interest, and those other amendments have been
previously considered and denied by the City Council
within the preceding twelve- (12) month period.
2 • The proposed amendment request site is located in an area
or is the site for which the City Council has initiated
a General Plan amendment, zone change, or land use study
scheduled for a public hearing within the next twelve-
(12) month period.
3• The proposed amendment request would create a spot land
use designation inconsistent with the planned land use
for the surrounding properties and inconsistent with the
goals and policies of the General Plan.
'7
ATTACHMENT 3
Resolution No. 94_ 1n55
Page 2
SECTION 3. The following criteria will be used by the City
Council as justification to approve the processing of a General
Plan amendment requeet:
1• The proposed amendment request is consistent with or has
a potential for consistency with the City's General Plan,
including applicable goals and policies.-
2. The proposed amendment request is compatible with or has
a potential for compatibility with either existing or
planned uses for the surrounding properties.
3• The proposed amendment request has the potential for
conformity with other City Council adopted policies.
4. The proposed amendment request has the potential to
provide, through the project approval process, public
improvements, public services, public amenities, and/or
financial contributions that the City Council determines
to be of substantial public benefit to the community.
SECTION 4. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and
adoption of this resolution and shall forward a certified copy
of said resolution to the Planning Commission.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED THIS 17th DAY OF 1994. AUGUST
ATTEST:
Mayor of the ity of M park
obu�:73
MOORPARK
799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark, California 93021 (805) 529-6864
C
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF VENTURA
CITY OF MOORPARK )
ss.
I, Lillian E. Hare, City Clerk of the City of Moorpark,
California, do hereby certify under penalty of perjury that
the foregoing Resolution No. 94-10.55 was adopted by the
City Council of the City of Moorpark at a meeting held on
the 1Zth day of _ AUG11gTr , 1994, and that
the same was adopted by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS HUNTER, MONTGOMERY, PEREZ, AND MAYOR LAWRASON
NOES: NONE
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBER WOZNIAK
ABSTAIN: NONE
WITNESS my hand and the official seal of said City
this h day of AUGUST , 1994.
�iian E. Hare
City Clerk
(Seal) �..�
PAUL W. LAWRASON JR. PATRICK HUNTER
Mayor SCOTT MONTGOMERY BERNARDO M. PEREZ
Mayor Pro Tern Councilmember
Councilmember
JOHN E. WOZNIAK
Concilmember
Printed on Recyclec at-