HomeMy WebLinkAboutAGENDA REPORT 1989 0802 CC REG ITEM 09C •
` MOORPARK ITEM . C .
7/2-
ELOISE BROWN rx K �a STEVEN KUENY
Mayor oP ��9 City Manager
BERNARDO M. PEREZ 47ItS CHERYL'J. KANE
Mayor Pro Tem /44001LeX4 City Attorney
CLINT HARPER, Ph. D. �`v,� • PATRICK RICHARDS, A.I.C.P.
Councilmember o m Director of
PAUL LAWRASON 9°0� i Community Development
Councilmember gTEo �`'` R. DENNIS DELZEIT
SCOTT MONTGOMERY City Engineer
Councilmember JOHN V. GILLESPIE
RICHARD T. HARE Chief of Police
City Treasurer
MEMORANDUM •
TO: The Honorable City Council
FROM: Patrick J. Richards, Director of Community Development
DATE: July 14, 1989 (CC meeting of August 2,1989)
SUBJECT: AMENDMENT TO THE SIGN CODE RELATING TO "FOR RENT AND FOR LEASE"
SIGNS WITHIN TIME MULTI-FAMMILY RESIDENTIAL ZONES
Itack of nc1,
On March 28, 1989, Council directed the Planning Commission to: a) set a.
public hearing to review the sign requirements of the zoning Ordinance with
a view towards up-dating said requirements to meet current trends and
practices regarding multi-family apartment, condomir_i:ium, or townhouse
project "For Rent or Lease" signs and b) to make a recommendation to the
City Council of such changes the Commission. deems appropriate.
Staff prepared an Ordinance addressing this issue which was heard before
the Planning Commission on June 19, 1989. At the Planning Commission
hearing held on June. 1.9, 1989, no members from the public spoke to this
issue. The Commission passed a Resolution recommending to the City Council
adoption of the staff recommended actions with minor staff recommended
changes and an addition to the language allowed on the signs. The
recommended changes are as follows:
a) That the signs not be placed within. f.ifty(50) feet from , any off-site
residence.
b) Additional language allowing "For Rent" and/or"For Lease" to be
displayed on the sign face.
c) Page 6 of Exhibit 5 had redundant language relating to amortization and
abatement. The language in these two sections has been combined.
d) Minor language change to the first sentence in the "abatement" section.
e) Amortization of the signs was changed from two years to
one year.
799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark, California 93021 (805) 529-6864
These minor changes have been incorporated in your attached exhibits.
Recommendation
1. Find that Negative Declaration/Initial Study is complete, has been
prepared in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act(CEQA),
the State CEQA guidelines, and City policy.
2. Find the City Council determine that the Contents of the Negative
Declaration/Initial Study have been considered in the decisions on this
proposed amendment to the Sign Code.
3. Adopt the proposed amendments to Chapter 50(Signs-Standards and Permits)
of the City of Moorpark Zoning Ordinance.
4. Rescind Ordinance Nos. 82 and 90 and replace with the attached Ordinance
which incorporates all previous amendments to Chapter 50(Signs-Standards
and Permits) and the proposed amendments(9.50.040(f) and 9.50.096) .
Exhibits: 1) Resolution No. 194 dated June 19, 1989 From the
Planning Commission with recommended actions
to the City Council.
2) Memorandum to the Planning Commission dated
June 13, 1989 with attachments.
3) Revised Ordinance
Minutes of the City Council ---
Moorpark, California Page 7 August 2, 1989
AMENDMENT TO THE MOTION: Councilmember Montgomery moved
and Mayor Brown seconded a motion to amend (G) amortization
to be 2 years rather than 1 year. The voice vote was three
to one, Councilmember Perez dissenting and Councilmember
Harper absent.
VOTE ON THE MAIN MOTION: The voice vote was unanimous with
Councilmember Harper absent.
,.�...�.n....;CALIFORNIA
City Council Meeting
of 1�, 1 982._
ACT N:
at4